alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o

. 1 0

- 3 0 4 0 3 S u m m a r y C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A ,
P l a i n t i f f

– A p p e l l e e ,

v

.
M A R I A A I D E D E L G A D O ,
D e f e n d a n t

– A p p e l l a n t

.

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e W e s t e r n D i s t r i c t o f L o u i s i a n a U S D C N o

. 6 : 0 6

- C R

- 6 0 0 7 4

- 5

B e f o r e W I E N E R , P R A D O , a n d O W E N , C i r c u i t J u d g e s

. P E R C U R I A M : *

T h e a t t o r n e y a p p o i n t e d t o r e p r e s e n t M a r i e A i d e D e l g a d o h a s m o v e d f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w a n d h a s f i l e d a b r i e f i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h A n d e r s v

. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 ( 1 9 6 7 ) , a n d U n i t e d S t a t e s v

. F l o r e s , 6 3 2 F

. 3 d 2 2 9 ( 5 t h C i r

. 2 0 1 1 )

. D e l g a d o h a s f

i l e d a r e s p o n s e

. H e r m o t i o n s t o s u p p l e m e n t h e r r e s p o n s e a r e G R A N T E D

. T h e r e c o r d i s i n s u f

f i c i e n t l y d e v e l o p e d t o a l l o w c o n s i d e r a t i o n a t t h i s t i m e

o f D e l g a d o ’ s c l a i m s o f i n e f f e c t i v e a s s i s t a n c e o f c o u n s e l ; s u c h c l a i m s g e n e r a l l y U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D April 6, 201 1
Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-30403 Document: 00511436744 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/06/2011N o

. 1 0

- 3 0 4 0 3

“ c a n n o t b e r e s o l v e d o n d i r e c t a p p e a l w h e n t h e c l a i m h a s n o t b e e n r a i s e d b e f o r e
t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t s i n c e n o o p p o r t u n i t y e x i s t e d t o d e v e l o p t h e r e c o r d o n t h e m e r i t s

o f t h e a l l e g a t i o n s

. ” U n i t e d S t a t e s v

. C a n t w e l l , 4 7 0 F

. 3 d 1 0 8 7 , 1 0 9 1 ( 5 t h C i r

. 2 0 0 6 ) ( i n t e r n a l q u o t a t i o n m a r k s a n d c i t a t i o n o m i t t e d )

. W e h a v e r e v i e w e d

c o u n s e l ’ s b r i e f a n d t h e r e l e v a n t p o r t i o n s o f t h e r e c o r d r e f

l e c t e d t h e r e i n , a s w e l l

a s D e l g a d o ’ s r e s p o n s e

. W e c o n c u r w i t h c o u n s e l ’ s a s s e s s m e n t t h a t t h e a p p e a l

p r e s e n t s n o n o n f

r i v o l o u s i s s u e f

o r a p p e l l a t e r e v i e w

. A c c o r d i n g l y , t h e m o t i o n f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n , t h e A P P E A L I S D I S M I S S E D , a n d a l l o t h e r o u t s t a n d i n g m o t i o n s a r e D E N I E D

. S e e 5 T H C I R

. R

. 4 2

. 2

.

2 Case: 10-30403 Document: 00511436744 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/06/2011
#### § 3550.6 State law or State supplement.

State and local laws and regulations, and the laws of federally recognized Indian tribes, may affect RHS implementation of certain provisions of this regulation, for example, with respect to the treatment of liens, construction, or environmental policies. Supplemental guidance may be issued in the case of any conflict or significant differences.
H E A L T H Y L I V I N G O N L I N E

A

t

a

Gla

n

c

e

My HealtheVet - At a Glance

My HealtheVet is VA’s award-winning, online Personal Health Record available at:

www.myhealth.va.gov. Available anywhere there is Internet access, My HealtheVet is for Veterans,

active duty Servicemembers, their dependents, and caregivers. With My HealtheVet, you can

access trusted and secure VA health information to better manage your overall health and wellness,

and to put the power of prevention in your hands. For Veterans, there are enhanced features and

facts about VA benefits and services to which you may be entitled.

After you register, you can:

n Record and track your health information and your

family’s health history

n Enter past and present military service events

n Keep activity and food journals

n Record, track, and graph vital signs

n Maintain other health measures

If you are a Veteran enrolled at a VA health care

facility, you can also access advanced features of

My HealtheVet. To access the advanced features, you must complete a one-time process called

In-Person Authentication or “IPA”. This includes making a personal visit to your VA facility to

verify your identity. After completing the IPA process, you can use My HealtheVet to:

n Refill your VA prescriptions by name, not just by the prescription number

n Record your non-VA medications, over the counter medications, vitamins and supplements

n Receive your customized VA Wellness Reminders

n Access new features as they become available

Expected in 2010, and after completing the IPA process, you will be able to view your VA

appointments, VA lab test results, and VA list of allergies. You also may communicate with your

health care teams through a “Secure Messaging” feature within My HealtheVet.

My HealtheVet: 24/7 Access to VA Health Care - It’s quick, easy and it’s forYOU!

Improve Your Health with Online Access

Register for My HealtheVet todayat

www.myhealth.va.gov. Ifyouarea VA patient, takea

few minutesduringyour next clinicvisit tocomplete

theone-timeIPA process. Begin your health and

wellness journeytoday!

www.myhealth.va.gov

Veterans Health Administration

Office of Health Information

www.va.gov IB 10-300,P96353Created:04/10

Fact Sheets - Glance_Layout 1 4/26/10 9:10 AM Page 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Alden Briggs, Appellant.

Upon appeal to this court from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County convicting defendant, *inter alia,*of the crime of assault in the second degree in violation of subdivision 5 of section 242 of the Penal Law, such judgment was reversed on the law and that count of the indictment dismissed (25 A D 2d 50). Upon appeal to the Court of Appeals, this court’s order was modified (19 N Y 2d 37) and the case remitted to this court for disposition of the facts in accordance with section 543-b of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Motion to restore appeal to the calendar granted, and upon restoration, the judgment of the County Court of Chemung County, convicting defendant of the crime of assault in the second degree in violation of subdivision 5 of section 242 of the Penal Law, and sentencing him to an indefinite term in accordance with article 3-A of the Correction Law, is affirmed. The findings of fact implicit in the verdict of the jury and the exercise of discretion are affirmed. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur.
Case 3:20-cv-05503-RV-HTC Document 58 Filed 09/26/22 Page 1 of 7
Case 3:20-cv-05503-RV-HTC Document 58 Filed 09/26/22 Page 2 of 7
Case 3:20-cv-05503-RV-HTC Document 58 Filed 09/26/22 Page 3 of 7
Case 3:20-cv-05503-RV-HTC Document 58 Filed 09/26/22 Page 4 of 7
Case 3:20-cv-05503-RV-HTC Document 58 Filed 09/26/22 Page 5 of 7
Case 3:20-cv-05503-RV-HTC Document 58 Filed 09/26/22 Page 6 of 7
Case 3:20-cv-05503-RV-HTC Document 58 Filed 09/26/22 Page 7 of 7
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
consolidated balance sheet of Transnational  Industries,  Inc. as of January 31,
1998 and the related consolidated  statement of operations and statement of cash
flows for the year then ended and is  qualified  in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000796228
<NAME>                        SPITZ, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                         471
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  737
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    1412
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               2755
<PP&E>                                         2675
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1927
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5883
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1789
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    76
<COMMON>                                       100
<OTHER-SE>                                     2534
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5883
<SALES>                                        7076
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7076
<CGS>                                          5064
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5064
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               363
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             125
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                181
<INCOME-TAX>                                   14
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            167
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                345
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   512
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.22
        

</TABLE>
|   | 1. |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                    |
|--------|----|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 2. |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                       | India Globalization Capital, Inc. |                                                                                                     |
|----------------------------|-----------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |                              |                                                                                                     |   |
| Date: August 20, 2012 | By:                               | /s/ John B. Selvaraj               |   |
|                       |                              | John B. Selvaraj                                                                                         |   |
|                       |                              | Treasurer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer                                                    |   |
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 1:90-cr-01036-MP -GRJ

ROBERT REE SMITH,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 430, Plaintiff’s Motion Pursuant to Rule 60(b)(6)

of the Federal of Civil Procedure to Vacate its Judgment and Re-open His Motion for PostConviction Relief. In this motion, Mr. Smith argues that the district court did not consider three

issues that he raised: (1) that his conviction and sentence were "Violations of the Ex-Post-FactoLaw"; (2) that he was actually innocent of having violated any of the drug laws, anytime, after

April 8, 1987, and (3) that the question of whether he had withdrawn from or abandoned the

conspiracy before November, 1987, should have been submitted to a jury.

In the order at Doc. 303, pages 2-6, the Court thoroughly considered and rejected Mr.

Smith’s argument that he withdrew from the conspiracy prior to November 2, 1987. 

Accordingly, the Court has addressed and rejected arguments (1) and (2) above. Issue (3) above

essentially argues that a fact used by the sentencing court to increase his sentence beyond what

otherwise would be the statutory maximum should have been alleged in the indictment and

proved beyond a reasonable doubt to the jury as fact finder. This is essentially an Apprendi1

argument, but Apprendi does not apply on collateral review. McCoy v. United States, 266 F.3d

1

 Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000).

Case 1:90-cr-01036-MP-GRJ Document 437 Filed 05/04/11 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

1245, 1256-58 (11th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 906, 122 S.Ct. 2362, 153 L.Ed.2d 183

(2002) (Apprendi established a new procedural rule which did not apply retroactively on

collateral review). Accordingly, the latest motion to vacate, Doc. 430, is denied. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 4th day of May, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case No: 1:90-cr-01036-MP -GRJ

Case 1:90-cr-01036-MP-GRJ Document 437 Filed 05/04/11 Page 2 of 2
#### § 3555.205 Special requirements for condominiums.

Loans may be guaranteed for condominium units in condominium projects that meet all the requirements of this part, as well as the standards for condominium standards established by HUD, Fannie Mae, VA, or Freddie Mac, including those related to self-certification, warranty, underwriting, and ineligible condominium projects.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 
|   | By: /s/ Arthur F. Helf               |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                 |
|   | Arthur F. Helf                       |
|   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | Dated: November 10, 2005        |

 

1

----
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:89cr4006-WS

TYRONE SMITH, 4:05cv186-WS

Defendant.

 

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO VOID SENTENCE

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 757)

docketed July 7, 2005. The magistrate judge recommends that the defendant's motion

to void sentence be summarily denied. The defendant has filed no objections to the

report and recommendation.

Upon review of the record, this court has determined that the report and

recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 757) is hereby

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order.

Case 4:89-cr-04006-WS-WCS Document 758 Filed 08/10/05 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 4:89cr4006-WS

2. The defendant’s motion to void sentence (docs. 754) and motion to

supplement petition (doc. 755) are hereby summarily DENIED.

3. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and shall close Case No.

4:05cv186-WS.

DONE AND ORDERED this August 10, 2005.

 /s William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:89-cr-04006-WS-WCS Document 758 Filed 08/10/05 Page 2 of 2
#### Harry A. Frankel, appellee, v. Fred Albrecht et al., defendants, on appeal of George Moehlenhoff, appellant.

Gen. No. 8,814.

Opinion filed November 30, 1934.

Scholes, O’Connor & Dougherty, for appellant; E. T. O’Connor, of counsel. Ira J. Covey, Edwin L. Covey and Wayne H. Mathis, for appellee.

Mr. Presiding Justice Wolfe

delivered the opinion of the court.
Sargent & Lundy L L C 

Jill A. Liska 

Associate Counset 

Tel.: (312) 269-2578 

Fax: (312) 269-9731 

December 23,2010 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8 

Office of Partnerships and Regulatory Assistance (8P-AR) 

1595 Wynkoop Street 

Denver, Colorado 80202-1129 

Attn: Gail Fallon 

Re: 	 Additional Extension: Sargent & LW1dy LLC Response to Information Request 

Under Section 114 of the Clean Air Act 

Dear Ms. Fallon: 

Thank you for granting Sargent & Lundy, L.L.C.'s ("S&L") request for an extension to 

January 7, 2011 for responding to the December 6th letter addressed to William DePriest 

at S&L. Although that request was recently granted, we need to respectfully request an 

additional extension until February 15, 2011 for several reasons. 

S&L is now aware that a key employee will be out of the office for several weeks. We 

anticipate that this employee has a large amount of project documents related to the 

Section 114 Request that we will not be able to compile until he returns to the office. 

Further, it is anticipated that we may need more time than originally anticipated to review 

the documents from our employees and project files and to receive permission to transmit 

them to the EPA. Per our contract with Basin Electric, Sargent & Lundy does not own 

title to the documents in our possession. Additionally, our agreement and our work with 

Basin is subject to a confidentiality agreement that will require permission from them 

before we are authorized to disclose these documents to the EPA. 

Thank you for your consideration of our request for an extension until February 15,2011. 

Please contact me at if you have any questions. 

Sincerely, 

Q1~ Associate COW1sel 

Sargent & Lundy, L.L.c. 

cc: 	 Bill DePriest, S&L 

55 East Monroe Street· Chicago, IL 60603-5780 USA· 312-269-2000
§ 3550.105 Site requirements. ( a ) *Rural areas.* Loans may be made only in rural areas designated by RHS. If an area designation is changed to nonrural an existing RHS borrower may receive 504 assistance.
( b ) *Not subdividable.* The site must not be large enough to subdivide into more than one site under existing local zoning ordinances.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PATRICIA KENNEDY,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No: 1:19-cv-200-AW-GRJ

ARPAN, LLC.,

Defendant,

_______________________________/

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF APPEAL

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Patricia Kennedy, the Plaintiff,

hereby appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit from

the District Court’s Order Denying Motion for Summary Judgment and Dismissing

Case for Lack of Jurisdiction [D.E. 45] entered in this action on September 25,

2020, Clerk’s Final Judgment [D.E. 46], September 25, 2020, Order Denying

Motion for Reconsideration [D.E. 49], December 17, 2020.

s/ Philip Michael Cullen, III, Esq.

PHILIP MICHAEL CULLEN, III

Attorney at law – Chartered

Fla. Bar No: 167853

621 South Federal Highway, Suite Four

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301

Telephone: (954) 462-0600

Facsimile: (954) 462-1717

CULLENIII@aol.com.com

Case 1:19-cv-00200-AW-GRJ Document 50 Filed 12/22/20 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that, on December 22, 2020, I

electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF

system which will automatically send e-mail notification of such filing to the

attorneys of record.

/s/Philip Michael Cullen, III, Esq.

Case 1:19-cv-00200-AW-GRJ Document 50 Filed 12/22/20 Page 2 of 2
Cash Compensation for Non-Management Directors of the Company



 EXHIBIT 10.23 
  
 CASH COMPENSATION FOR 
 NON-MANAGEMENT DIRECTORS OF THE REGISTRANT 
  
 Iomega’s non-management Directors receive certain fees for their services on the Board of Directors and its committees. In addition, all non-management Directors are reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses incurred
in connection with Iomega’s business activities. The fees paid to non-management Directors are paid pursuant to the fee schedule in effect at March 15, 2005, as set forth below: 
  

				
	 	  	Current Fees


	 Annual Retainer:
	  	 	 
	 Chairman of the Board (receives no other committee or meeting fees)
	  	$	100,000
	 Other Non-Employee Directors
	  	$	20,000
		
	 Committee Fees:
	  	 	 
	 Chairman of the Audit Committee
	  	$	33,000
	 Chairman of the Ethics and Compliance Committee
	  	$	10,000
	 Chairman of the Compensation Committee
	  	$	16,667
	 Members of the Audit Committee
	  	$	6,667
	 Members of the Compensation Committee
	  	$	5,000
	 Other Members of a Standing Committee (other than the
 Nominating and Governance Committee)
	  	$	3,333
		
	 Meeting Fees:
	  	 	 
	 Board Meeting
	  	$	2,000
	 Committee Meeting (not paid if meeting fees exceed $3,667for same two-day period)
	  	$	1,667
	 Per Board or Committee Meeting by Teleconference
	  	$	500

  
 There are no committee
or meeting fees with respect to the Nominating and Governance Committee.
#### § 29.2294 Semicured.

Tobacco in the process of being cured or which is partially but not thoroughly cured. Semicured includes tobacco which contains fat stems, wet butts, swelled stems, or stems that have not been thoroughly dried in the curing process. (See Rule 22, § 29.2413.)
#### § 28.422 Strict Middling Spotted Color.

Strict Middling Spotted Color is color which is within the range represented by a set of samples in the custody of the United States Department of Agriculture in a container marked “Original Official Cotton Standards of the United States, American Upland, Strict Middling Spotted, effective July 1, 1987.”