alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 322.16 Packaging of shipments. ( a ) Restricted organisms must be packed in a container or combination of containers that will prevent the escape of the organisms and the leakage of any contained materials. The container must be sufficiently strong to prevent it from rupturing or breaking during shipment.
( b ) The outer container must be clearly marked with the contents of the shipment, *i.e.,* either “Live Bees,” “Bee Germ Plasm,” or “Live Bee Brood,” and the name of the region of origin.
( c ) Only approved packing materials may be used in a shipment of restricted organisms. ( 1 ) The following materials are approved as packing materials: Absorbent cotton or processed cotton padding free of cottonseed; cages made of processed wood; cellulose materials; excelsior; felt; ground peat (peat moss); paper or paper products; phenolic resin foam; sawdust; sponge rubber; thread waste, twine, or cord; and vermiculite.
( 2 ) Other materials, such as host material for the organism, soil, or other types of packing material, may be included in a container only if identified in the permit application and approved by APHIS on the permit.
#### § 3430.57 Project meetings.

In addition to reviewing (and monitoring the status of) progress and final technical reports and financial reports, NIFA Program Officers may use regular and periodic conference calls to monitor the awardee's performance as well as PD conferences, workshops, meetings, and symposia to not only monitor the awards, but to facilitate communication and the sharing of project results. These opportunities also serve to eliminate or minimize NIFA funding unneeded duplicative project activities. Required attendance at these conference calls, conferences, workshops, meetings, and symposia will be identified in the RFA and the awardee should develop a proposal accordingly.
jill

- 1**~** ·, . ; 

## l**~** t 1, , • : • , 

## ! 1 , , : .. •• ; 

## l L 1·. 

### i
. \ · 

## l : .1. :**~** P rosram L(•\ 

### Pl-**U.ldH~lo;-·~; d~**  

### grt"<a Progra.m Length- -l 

### ve.lrs

o How n 1uch will t hi s progmm cos t mo?- · A Tuiti o n an d frHts : $ 36. 000 Books and s uppli e s: S4 , 800 On - camp u ,. room 

### & b oDrd: $24 , 000 W h at othor cost s aro t hnre tOt t hts nmgram? For rut1h«H pr<>Qram cos t sn'formation**~** "'The amounts s hO\tm obOvo tnd ud o costs Cor too cn two program . a ss umlng norma l time t o completion. Note lhat nu

s 1nform o: rhon es s ubiect to change



### 0 What financing o ptJons a r o availob l o to h e fJl



### e n e p .ny for t, hi s pro g ns n1? A ,: in 8ncing f or th i s pro g r tu n m ay b e n vall ab l e 

### thr o u gh gran t s . sc h o l a r ships, l oans (fcd o r o l e nd p..-ivato) and i n s t itut i ona l financing p l an s. Tho n1 e-dhsn o m o unt of debt f or prognu n gr .oduo t cs i s s h o wn b el ow : F<>derc l l o ans : 

### SG.OOO Priv a t e e du ca t ion l oo n s: $ 3.500 

### In stit uti o n a l fi n a n ci ng pion: S 3.500 Tt1o sChool has o teet o d to prov i d e the following a dd fbonal tn fo n n:.tlon SO% of prog ram g ra d uates used loans to help rmancc thctr costs 

### tor th is program o Ito w l ong wi ll i t t u.ko 

### rn c t o co rnpl o r: e Lhl 5: p ro guu u? 

### A T ho proun un is des ign ed t o t ake 4 y ca r" S 

### to complete. 0 1t ho&-e that c ornp l e t od th o 

### program . 

## aor:a @813 . 58 % finishe d in 4 ye ers. 0 Wh n t n rc my c h anco5 o f gottJng a j o b w he n I gra du a t e? 

### A Bo th t he institut ion ' s 

### s tato and**t~cc odi** **or** 

### r"e qui ro t ho c . al c ul a t jon o r ft j o b pl.oce rn c nt 

### re te for t his 

### pro gnun. S t a t e Ra t o: T h e j o b prae. e rn ont n n o 

### for s t ude nt s wh o completed t he pr· og r c rn i s 8 0 4f •• FOJ tuthc• m formatlon abOut tn.ls job J)lacomont rato
.**~** A ccre ditor R o to: Tho job p leccm o nt ra t o for n tudont:s wh o com p l ated t ho prog r'a f'n i s 00%. F'or ruther 1 ntormation about thlc: job placement rata
.**~**



### CliLk h&ril 

### for**,....lr\.,~tlo­** 

### _J
..... 

## w .. to 

### t iVs 1""'!.1 ....""-



## 0 For addltJOn:Uinf ormauon rela t ed t o this program and/or the Blformauon provkJod**abOve ~**  

### Oct o C roatod: 11 /512013
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThermoelastic vibration test techniquesThe structural integrity of proposed high speed aircraft can be seriously affected by the extremely high surface temperatures and large temperature gradients throughout the vehicle's structure. Variations in the structure's elastic characteristics as a result of thermal effects can be observed by changes in vibration frequency, damping, and mode shape. Analysis codes that predict these changes must be correlated and verified with experimental data. The experimental modal test techniques and procedures used to conduct uniform, nonuniform, and transient thermoelastic vibration tests are presented. Experimental setup and elevated temperature instrumentation considerations are also discussed. Modal data for a 12 by 50 inch aluminum plate heated to a temperature of 475 F are presented. These data show the effect of heat on the plate's modal characteristics. The results indicated that frequency decreased, damping increased, and mode shape remained unchanged as the temperature of the plate was increased.Document ID19910009770Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsKehoe, Michael W.*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA., United States)*Snyder, H. Todd*(PRC Kentron, Inc., Edwards CA., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1991Subject CategoryAircraft Design, Testing And PerformanceReport/Patent NumberH-1707NASA-TM-101742NAS 1.15:101742Meeting InformationMeeting: International Modal Analysis ConferenceLocation: FlorenceCountry: ItalyStart Date: April 14, 1991End Date: April 18, 1991Accession Number91N19083Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-66-31Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910009770.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### Terry P. Rabideau et al., Respondents, v George C. Oswald, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered February 13, 1980 in Clinton County, which granted respondents’ motion pursuant to CPLR 5226 by directing appellant to make specified installment payments on account of a judgment. In a civil action, respondents recovered a judgment in the amount of $15,225.70 against appellant and that judgment was filed in the Clinton County Clerk’s office on January 6, 1978. Shortly thereafter, appellant filed a petition in bankruptcy. Respondents’ judgment, however, was held to be nondischargeable in bankruptcy. In attempt^ ing to collect on their judgment, respondents made a motion pursuant to CPLR 5226 for an order directing appellant to pay respondents $50 per week in installment payments. An information subpoena was answered by appellant and an examination held revealing that appellant lived with his son and paid no rent; that he did not pay for food or furniture; and that he had no car, boat, plane, bank accounts, or insurance. It was also revealed, however, that appellant received money from his wife and from the son with whom he was living. Special Term granted respondents’ motion and this appeal ensued. Appellant contends *945that respondents failed to prove that he is receiving or will receive money from any source as required by CPLR 5226 in that any money he received from his son or wife was on an irregular basis. We disagree. The wording of the statute is broad and should be read expansively to promote the obvious intent of the Legislature (see 6 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, par 5226.07). Contributions or gratuities received or to be received from relatives should be considered to constitute money from any source as used in CPLR 5226 (see *Binder v Schenk,*30 AD2d 596; *Bergman v Buechler,*249 App Div 553). It is also argued that the reasonable requirements of the appellant were not adequately considered. The burden of proof was on appellant to show his reasonable requirements *(Binder v Schenk, supra)*and on the present record we cannot say that Special Term failed to sufficiently take into account the proof offered by appellant on this issue. Considering the record in its entirety, it is the opinion of this court that Special Term did not improvidently exercise its discretion in directing installment payments of $50 per week and, therefore, the order must be affirmed. Order affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Kane and Main, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Andre J. and Two Others. Angel Guardian Home, Appellant; Yvonne D., Respondent.

In proceedings pursuant to *601section 384-b (subd 4, par [b]) of the Social Services Law for orders committing the guardianship of three children to the Angel Guardian Home, the home appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County, dated October 4, 1979, which denied its motion to vacate the court’s order dated June 13, 1979, which dismissed the petitions. Order reversed, motion granted and petitions reinstated, without costs or disbursements. We note that the standards and goals of the Family Court, upon the time limitations of which the petitions herein were dismissed for failure to perfect service within the applicable period, are precatory guidelines designed to aid in the relieving of calendar congestion by the establishment of rules and sanctions relative to the time limitations for fact findings. Notwithstanding the fact that dismissal of a petition is a specified sanction authorized by the standards and goals, we find dismissal of the petitions herein to have been an abuse of discretion. Petitioner’s failure to perfect service appears to have occurred solely through error on the part of the newspaper in which publication of service was to be made. In these proceedings to terminate parental custody, dismissal would deprive petitioner of the jurisdiction over the natural mother which it had obtained after much time and difficulty, and it is our opinion that injustice would result were petitioner to be required to commence new proceedings. Hence, we believe petitioner is entitled to reinstatement of the petitions and to a new "order of publication” to effect service over the putative father. We note in this regard the availability of the Family Court Reserve Calendar should it be deemed advisable not to place these proceedings upon the Ready Calendar until such time as service is perfected. Rabin, J. P., Margett, Martuscello and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

LANA MARIE STAINROD,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 3:20cv5456-MCR-HTC

SCARLET PEARL CASINO RESORT,

Defendant.

/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation dated December 7, 2020, recommending that Defendant’s Motion 

to Dismiss Amended Complaint be granted, and the case dismissed, for lack of 

personal jurisdiction. ECF No. 21. The parties have been furnished a copy of the 

Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file 

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b). I have made a 

de novo determination of all timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections 

thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should 

be adopted.

Case 3:20-cv-05456-MCR-HTC Document 22 Filed 01/20/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:20cv5456-MCR-HTC

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

(1) The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 21, is 

adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.

(2) The Defendants’ motion to dismiss, ECF No. 14, is GRANTED, and 

this case is DISMISSED for lack of personal jurisdiction. Defendant’s motion to 

dismiss, ECF No. 7, is MOOT.

(3) The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 19th day of January 2021.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-05456-MCR-HTC Document 22 Filed 01/20/21 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 31.2**I, Kolja Rockov, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Linn Energy, LLC (the“registrant”);  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materialaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:June 30, 2006/s/ KoljaRockov
§ 3201.27 Films. ( a ) *Definition.* ( 1 ) Products that are used in packaging, wrappings, linings, and other similar applications.
( 2 ) Films for which preferred procurement applies are: ( i ) *Semi-durable films.* Films that are designed to resist water, ammonia, and other compounds, to be re-used, and to not readily biodegrade. Products in this item are typically used in the production of bags and packaging materials.
( ii ) *Non-durable films.* Films that are intended for single use for short-term storage or protection before being discarded. Non-durable films that are designed to have longer lives when used are included in this item.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The minimum biobased content for all films shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product. The applicable minimum biobased contents are: ( 1 ) Semi-durable films—45 percent.
( 2 ) Non-durable films—85 percent.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than May 14, 2009, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased semi-durable and non-durable films. By that date, Federal agencies that have the responsibility for drafting or reviewing specifications for items to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased semi-durable and non-durable films.
( d ) *Determining overlap with an EPA-designated recovered content product.* Qualifying products within the semi-durable films subcategory may overlap with the EPA-designated recovered content product: Plastic trash bags. USDA is requesting that manufacturers of these qualifying biobased products provide information for the BioPreferred Web site of qualifying biobased products about the intended uses of the product, information on whether or not the product contains any recovered material, in addition to biobased ingredients, and performance standards against which the product has been tested. This information will assist Federal agencies in determining whether or not a qualifying biobased product overlaps with EPA-designated plastic trash bags and which product should be afforded the preference in purchasing.
Note to paragraph ( d
):
Biobased semi-durable film products within this designated item can compete with plastic trash bag products with recycled content. Under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, section 6002, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency designated plastic trash bags containing recovered materials as items for which Federal agencies must give preference in their purchasing programs. The designation can be found in the Comprehensive Procurement Guideline, 40 CFR 247.16. EPA provides recovered materials content recommendations for plastic trash bags in the May 1, 1995, Recovered Materials Advisory Notice (RMAN I). The RMAN recommendations can be found on EPA's Web site *http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/non-hw/procure/products.htm* and then clicking on the appropriate product name.
[73 FR 27973, May 14, 2008]
##### 



Exhibit 31(a)
 CERTIFICATIONS
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q (this Report) of Alpha NR Holding, Inc. (the Registrant);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this Report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
Report;4.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this Report is being prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this Report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    Disclosed in this Report any change in the Registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal
control over financial reporting;
 5.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant
role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 /s/ Michael J. QuillenMichael J. QuillenPresident and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)  38
§ 227.31 Audits, management reviews, and evaluations. ( a ) *Audits.* ( 1 ) Examinations by the State agencies in the form of audits or internal audits shall be performed in accord with 2 CFR part 200, subpart F and Appendix XI, Compliance Supplement.
( b ) *Management reviews.* The State agency is responsible for meeting the following requirements: ( 1 ) The State agency shall establish management evaluation and review procedures to monitor compliance with the State plan for local educational agencies and land grant colleges, other institutions of higher education and public or private nonprofit educational or research agencies, institutions, or organizations.
( 2 ) The State agency shall require participating agencies to establish program review procedures to be used in reviewing the Agencies operations and those of subsidiaries or contractors.
( c ) *Evaluations.* The State agency shall conduct formal evaluations of program activities at least annually. These evaluations shall be aimed at assessing the effectiveness of the various activities undertaken by the State and local agencies. State officials shall analyze why some activities have proved effective while others have not and shall initiate appropriate improvements. The results of the evaluations shall be used to make adjustments in ongoing activities and to plan activities and programs for the next year's State plan. The State agency shall submit a plan for evaluation of Program activities as part of the State plan in accordance with § 227.37(b)(14).
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0584-0062) (44 U.S.C. 3506; E.O. 12372 (July 14, 1982, 47 FR 30959); sec. 401(b) Intergovernmental Cooperation Act of 1968 (31 U.S.C. 6506(c))
[44 FR 28282, May 15, 1979, as amended at 47 FR 746, Jan. 7, 1982; 48 FR 29123, June 24, 1983; 81 FR 66493, Sept. 28, 2016]
#### § 29.2307 Sweating.

The condition of tobacco in the process of fermentation.

[37 FR 13521, July 11, 1972. Redesignated at 51 FR 40406, Nov. 7, 1986]