alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[108th Congress Public Law 380]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ380.108]

[[Page 118 STAT. 2210]]

Public Law 108-380
108th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To clarify the boundaries of the John H. Chafee Coast Barrier Resources 
         System Cedar Keys Unit P25 on Otherwise Protected Area 
              P25P. <<NOTE: Oct. 30, 2004 -  [H.R. 3056]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 16 USC 3503 note.>> REPLACEMENT OF CERTAIN JOHN H. 
            CHAFEE COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM MAP.

    (a) In General.--Of the 2 maps subtitled ``P25/P25P'' that relate to 
the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System unit designated as 
Coastal Barrier Resources System Cedar Keys Unit P25/P25P and are 
included in the set of maps entitled ``Coastal Barrier Resources 
System'' referred to in section 4(a) of the Coastal Barrier Resources 
Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)), the map depicting the northernmost area of that 
unit is hereby replaced by another map relating to that unit entitled 
``John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System Cedar Keys Unit P25/
P25P'' and dated February 9, 2004.
    (b) Availability.--The Secretary of the Interior shall keep the 
replacement map referred to in subsection (a) on file and available for 
inspection in accordance with section 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier 
Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(b)).

    Approved October 30, 2004.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3056:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 108-641 (Comm. on Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):
            Sept. 13, considered and passed House.
            Oct. 11, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### David I. Koegel, Appellant, v. Emanuel Birnbaum et al., Respondents.

Order entered on September 14, 1966, denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, made pursuant to CPLR 3213, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements to appellant, and motion granted, with $10 costs. This is an action on a note given by defendants in payment for plaintiff’s stock in Douglas Restaurant Corp. Plaintiff fully complied with all the terms and conditions contained in the agreement of sale of his interests in Douglas Restaurant Corp., when he deposited his stock in said corporation, duly indorsed in blank, with the escrowee and executed a general release. No other facts constituting a defense are alleged. Concur—Steuer, J. P., Capozzoli, Tilzer and McNally, JJ.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 166 (Tuesday, August 27, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 52893]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-20752]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R07-OAR-2013-0446; FRL 9900-38-Region 7]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Iowa

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the State 
Implementation Plan (SIP) for the state of Iowa. The purpose of these 
revisions is to update the Polk County Board of Health Rules and 
Regulations. These proposed revisions reflect updates to the Iowa 
statewide rules previously approved by EPA and will ensure consistency 
between the applicable local agency rules and Federally-approved rules.

DATES: Comments on this proposed action must be received in writing by 
September 26, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-
OAR-2013-0446 by mail to: Michael Jay, Environmental Protection Agency, 
Air Planning and Development Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, 
Kansas 66219. Comments may also be submitted electronically or through 
hand delivery/courier by following the detailed instructions in the 
ADDRESSES section of the direct final rule located in the rules section 
of this Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Jay at (913) 551-7460, or by 
email at jay.michael@epa.gov

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the final rules section of the Federal 
Register, EPA is approving the state's SIP revision as a direct final 
rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a 
noncontroversial revision amendment and anticipates no relevant adverse 
comments to this action. A detailed rationale for the approval is set 
forth in the direct final rule. If no relevant adverse comments are 
received in response to this action, no further activity is 
contemplated in relation to this action. If EPA receives relevant 
adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all 
public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule 
based on this proposed action. EPA will not institute a second comment 
period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this 
action should do so at this time. Please note that if EPA receives 
adverse comment on part of this rule and if that part can be severed 
from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those parts of 
the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. For additional 
information, see the direct final rule which is located in the rules 
section of this Federal Register.

    Dated: August 1, 2013.
Mark Hague,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7.
[FR Doc. 2013-20752 Filed 8-26-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
*Wednesday, November 4,1998*

MERIT DOCKET

98-1700.

#### State v. Trent.

Allen App. No. 1-98-3. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that no conflict exists within the meaning of S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(2)(B). See *State v. Rush*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 53, 697 N.E.2d 634. This cause is therefore dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
# C_2021070EN.01001901.xml

| 26.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 70/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 70/19

---

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises for the financial year 2020 – amending budget No 3

(2021/C 70/05)

REVENUE

| Title
  Chapter | Heading | Budget 2020 | Amending budget No 3 | New amount |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2 | COMMISSION SUBSIDY |
| 2 0 | COMMISSION SUBSIDY | 51 527 150 | –2 286 346 | 49 240 804 |
| | Title 2 — Total | 51 527 150 | –2 286 346 | 49 240 804 |
| 9 | MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE |
| 9 0 | MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE | p.m. | | p.m. |
| | Title 9 — Total | p.m. | | p.m. |
| | GRAND TOTAL | 51 527 150 | –2 286 346 | 49 240 804 |

Title

Chapter

Heading

Budget 2020

Amending budget No 3

New amount

2

COMMISSION SUBSIDY

2 0

COMMISSION SUBSIDY

51 527 150

–2 286 346

49 240 804

Title 2 — Total

51 527 150

–2 286 346

49 240 804

9

MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE

9 0

MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE

p.m.

p.m.

Title 9 — Total

p.m.

p.m.

GRAND TOTAL

51 527 150

–2 286 346

49 240 804

EXPENDITURE

| Title
  Chapter | Heading | Appropriations 2020 | Amending budget No 3 | New amount |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | STAFF EXPENDITURE |
| 1 1 | REMUNERATIONS, ALLOWANCES AND CHARGES | 37 697 000 | – 340 000 | 37 357 000 |
| 1 2 | PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND SOCIAL EXPENDITURE | 2 391 900 | –23 500 | 2 368 400 |
| | Title 1 — Total | 40 088 900 | – 363 500 | 39 725 400 |
| 2 | INFRASTRUCTURE AND OPERATING EXPENDITURE |
| 2 1 | BUILDING EXPENDITURE | 5 465 500 | –17 346 | 5 448 154 |
| 2 2 | ICT EXPENDITURE | 2 155 000 | –15 000 | 2 140 000 |
| 2 3 | MOVABLE PROPERTY AND ASSOCIATED COSTS | 248 000 | –42 000 | 206 000 |
| | Title 2 — Total | 7 868 500 | –74 346 | 7 794 154 |
| 3 | PROGRAMME SUPPORT EXPENDITURE |
| 3 1 | PROGRAMME MANAGEMENT EXPENDITURE | 3 569 750 | –1 848 500 | 1 721 250 |
| | Title 3 — Total | 3 569 750 | –1 848 500 | 1 721 250 |
| | GRAND TOTAL | 51 527 150 | –2 286 346 | 49 240 804 |

Title

Chapter

Heading

Appropriations 2020

Amending budget No 3

New amount

1

STAFF EXPENDITURE

1 1

REMUNERATIONS, ALLOWANCES AND CHARGES

37 697 000

– 340 000

37 357 000

1 2

PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND SOCIAL EXPENDITURE

2 391 900

–23 500

2 368 400

Title 1 — Total

40 088 900

– 363 500

39 725 400

2

INFRASTRUCTURE AND OPERATING EXPENDITURE

2 1

BUILDING EXPENDITURE

5 465 500

–17 346

5 448 154

2 2

ICT EXPENDITURE

2 155 000

–15 000

2 140 000

2 3

MOVABLE PROPERTY AND ASSOCIATED COSTS

248 000

–42 000

206 000

Title 2 — Total

7 868 500

–74 346

7 794 154

3

PROGRAMME SUPPORT EXPENDITURE

3 1

PROGRAMME MANAGEMENT EXPENDITURE

3 569 750

–1 848 500

1 721 250

Title 3 — Total

3 569 750

–1 848 500

1 721 250

GRAND TOTAL

51 527 150

–2 286 346

49 240 804

---
H. R. 2611 

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and thirteen 

An Act 

To designate the headquarters building of the Coast Guard on the campus located 

at 2701 Martin Luther King, Jr., Avenue Southeast in the District of Columbia 

as the ‘‘Douglas A. Munro Coast Guard Headquarters Building’’, and for other 

purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

The headquarters building of the Coast Guard on the campus 

located at 2701 Martin Luther King, Jr., Avenue Southeast in 

the District of Columbia shall be known and designated as the 

‘‘Douglas A. Munro Coast Guard Headquarters Building’’. 

SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, 

or other record of the United States to the building referred to 

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Douglas 

A. Munro Coast Guard Headquarters Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Franklin Ashby, Respondent, v ARC Electric Corp. et al., Appellants. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

nt. Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed September 25,1978. On November 23,1976, at about 2:00 p.m., the claimant, a 56-year-old assistant foreman, with pre-existing coronary sclerosis, employed as a foreman by Arc Electric Corp. (an electric contracting firm), suffered a heart injury immediately after walking up 9 to 10 flights of stairs on his job site to distribute pay envelopes at the request of his superior. The condition was diagnosed as an acute interior wall myocardial infarction. An elevator was provided, but the claimant did not elect to use it. The claimant testified he walked up the stairs leisurely as there was no pressure requiring him to hurry. The board found that the claimant’s work activities were stressful for the claimant and constituted an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment and that the claimant’s disability is causally related to such accidental injury. The finding of the board is supported by substantial evidence *(Matter of Schuren v Wolfson,*30 NY2d 90; *Matter of McCormick v Green Bus Lines,*29 NY2d 246). The claimant was doing his job, walking up the stairs to deliver pay envelopes. That exertion coupled with his pre-existing deficiency and supported by medical evidence as *to*causal effect adequately supports the board’s determination. That the claimant chose to walk the stairs instead of taking the elevator is not significant. His instant job at the time was to deliver the pay envelopes by whatever reasonable means he selected. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workers’ Compensation Board against the employer and its insurance carrier. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Kane and Casey, JJ., concur.
OFFER LETTER TO MARTIN D MADAUS



 Exhibit 10.2 
  
 MILLIPORE 
  
 October 11, 2004 
  
 Dr. Martin Madaus 
 12481 Silver Bay Circle 
 Indianapolis, IN 46236 
  
 Dear Dr. Madaus:

  
 It is with great pleasure that I write to offer you formally the Chief
Executive Officer position at Millipore Corporation. We also plan to elect you to the Board of Directors at the first Board meeting following the announcement of your joining Millipore. It was the unanimous decision of the non-executive officer
members of the Board of Directors that you will make an excellent leader of the company. 
  
 In addition to the benefit programs which were sent to you by our general counsel, Jeffrey Rudin, the following summarizes the compensation package which we have discussed with you previously: 
  
 Salary—$600,000 per annum 
  
 Bonus—subject to Board discretion and achievement of corporate and personal
goals, generally on the order of 65% of salary per annum 
  
 Options—150,000 options to be awarded on joining the company with an exercise price equal to the closing price of the company’s stock on the preceding day; an annual ‘equity’ award will also be part of the
compensation package but the form of instrument (option/restricted stock etc) is under review. 
  
 Forfeited Roche compensation—It is our objective to make you whole for any Roche compensation forfeited by your decision to accept our offer. While this amount is not currently determinable, we will
pay you in cash for the forfeited value of any awards vesting in December, 2004 and February, 2005 and in options or restricted stock for the forfeited value of any awards vesting in February, 2006.  







 Severance Agreement and Change of Control Agreement—The company will execute its current CEO severance
agreement and change of control agreement (copies of which have been provided to you) on your first day of employment. 
  
 Relocation Benefits—We will pay any costs of relocation including the friction costs of selling your existing home in Indiana and buying a new one in
Massachusetts. We will not however purchase your home nor act as a lender in helping you finance the purchase of a new one. 
  
 Start Date—We obviously would prefer for you to start as soon as possible but understand that you are subject to a contractual 3 month notice period.
We understand that the ultimate start date will be determined by negotiation with Roche but in no event will be later than February 1, 2005. We ask only that you attempt to minimize our costs while accelerating your arrival at Millipore. 

 
 Drug Testing—It is the company’s policy that all new hires undergo
drug screening prior to commencing employment. We will provide the pertinent testing information to you after your appointment has been announced.  
  
 Please indicate your acceptance of this offer by signing, dating and returning one fully executed copy of this letter to Jeffrey Rudin at Millipore. 
  

			
	Sincerely,	 	 
		
	 /s/ Maureen Hendricks/J.R.

	 	 
	Maureen Hendricks	 	 
		
	 /s/ Martin Madaus

	 	 10-14-04


	Dr. Martin Madaus	 	Date
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      ss.1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Datascension Inc. (the "Company")on
      Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the
      "Report")"Report"), I, David Lieberman, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company,
      certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                David LiebermanDAVID
                LIEBERMAN
              Prin.
                Accounting OfficerDated:
                August 7, 2008
#### § 3550.115 WWD grant program objectives.

The objective of the WWD individual grant program is to facilitate the use of community water and waste disposal systems by the residents of colonias along the border between the U.S. and Mexico. WWD grants are processed the same as Section 504 grants, except as specified in this subpart.

[67 FR 78331, Dec. 24, 2002]
PRIVATE LAW 108–3—OCT. 30, 2004

★ (Star Print)

Private Law 108–3

108th Congress

An Act

For the relief of Richi James Lesley.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR RICHI JAMES LESLEY.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of

section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Richi James

Lesley shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for

adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for

permanent residence upon filing an application for issuance of

an immigrant visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment

of status to lawful permanent resident.

(b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Richi James Lesley enters the

United States before the filing deadline specified in subsection

(c), he shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully

and shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status

under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of

the date of the enactment of this Act.

(c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance

of an immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status

is filed with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of

the enactment of this Act.

(d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—Upon the

granting of an immigrant visa or permanent residence to Richi

James Lesley, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper

officer to reduce by 1, during the current or next following fiscal

year, the total number of immigrant visas that are made available

to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a)

of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total

number of immigrant visas that are made available to natives

of the country of the alien’s birth under section 202(e) of such

Act.

(e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION TREATMENT FOR

CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural parents, brothers, and sisters

of Richi James Lesley shall not, by virtue of such relationship,

Applicability.

Oct. 30, 2004

[H.R. 712]

PRIVATE LAW 108–3—OCT. 30, 2004

be accorded any right, privilege, or status under the Immigration

and Nationality Act.

Approved October 30, 2004.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Richard Moore, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Fox Petroleum Inc.
      for the period ended May 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Fox Petroleum Inc..                                                              

Dated: July 20, 2009

| | /s/ Richard Moore                                      
| | -------------------------------------------------------
| | Richard Moore                                          
| | President, Chief Executive Officer, Chairman,
      and
| | Director                                               
| | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Financial
| | Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer)             



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Fox Petroleum
Inc. and will be retained by Fox Petroleum Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
#### § 29.3513 Cured.

Tobacco dried of its sap by either natural or artificial processes.
Exhibit 11


                              THERMO TERRATECH INC.

                    Computation of Earnings (Loss) per Share

                                                   Year Ended
                                   -----------------------------------------
                                     March 29,      March 30,       April 1,
                                          1997           1996           1995
                                   -----------    -----------    -----------
   Computation of Primary
     Earnings (Loss) per Share:

   Net income (loss) (a)           $  (162,000)   $ 3,447,000    $ 4,476,000
                                   -----------    -----------    -----------

   Shares:
     Weighted average shares
       outstanding                  18,090,115     17,419,826     17,142,815

     Add: Shares issuable from
          assumed exercise of
          options and warrants
          (as determined by the
          application of the
          treasury stock
          method)                            -        817,544              -
                                   -----------    -----------    -----------
     Weighted average shares
       outstanding, as
       adjusted (b)                 18,090,115     18,237,370     17,142,815
                                   -----------    -----------    -----------
   Primary Earnings (Loss) per
     Share (a) / (b)               $      (.01)   $       .19    $       .26
                                   ===========    ===========    ===========