alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
J
. Randolp h Babbitt ZOI O NO V 1 8 P 2

- 0 2 Administrato r Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , N W Washington , D C RE : Concern s wit

h FAA' s NPR M o n Fligh t Time/Duty Tim e Dea r Administrato r

Babbitt : A s amember

o f th e flyin g public , 1 hav e seriou s concern s abou t th e FAA' s propose d ne w Flight Time/Duty Tim e requirements
. Whil e I appreciat e th e FAA' s attempt s t o make publi c safet y a to p priority , I don' t

believ e tha

t th e Notic e o f

Propose d Rulemakin g (NPRM ) goe s fa r enoug h to effectivel y addres s pilo t

fatigue
. A s you know , th e curren t

NPR M include s asignifican t increas e in th e numbe r

o f pilots ' fligh

t hour s an ddoe s no t

ensur e adequat e res t

periods
. I strongl y disagre e wit h thes e provisions
. I

t i s imperativ e tha

t al l crewmember s receiv e aminimu mo f eigh t hour s o f slee p per nigh t - the y are n o different

tha n th e res t o f us . I n thei r douT i time , pilot s nee d t o ge t

abit e t o eat , exercise , cal l hom e to thei r

love dones , get

read y fo r bed , an d stil l hav e enoug h tim e t o ge t aful l night' s sleep
. Th e propose dnin e hour s o f res t doesn' t allo w sufficient

tim e fo r pilot s t o tak e car e o f

themselve s andstil l get

enoug h slee p to d o thei r

job s to th e bes t

o f thei r abilities
. Not e tha t a s aBoein g enginee r

involve d wit

h flight tes t ne w airplanes , I ca

n tel l yo u Boein g require s all engineers , pilots , an dtechnician s t o hav e n o les s than 1 2 hour s o f "cre w rest " before ates t flight
. On to p o f decreasin g th e amoun t

o f res t apilo t ca n get , th e NPR M i s als o proposin g to increas e fligh t tim e by 25%
. I kno w fromexperienc e tha t puttin g in alon g day a

t wor k i s exhaustin g - andi t i s commo n sens e tha

t increasin g th e numbe r

o f hour s apilo t

spend s i n th e cockpi t

wil l increas e fatigue
. Te n hour s o f in-fligh t tim e i s simpl y to o much
. A s afrequen t traveler , i

t i s critical t o me that

every pilo t

o n every fligh

t i s well-reste d an d well-prepare d fo r ou r trip
. Th e NPR M a s currentl y writte n decrease s m y leve l o f confidenc e that

thi s wil l b e th e case . Thi s propose drul e i s criticall y importan t no t onl y to airlin e employees , bu t als o t o th e flyin g publi c - peopl e lik e me . We nee dt o er r o n th e sid e o f

cautio n an d mak e sur e tha t th e rule s w e establis h encourag e ou r

pilot s t o get

th e res t the y nee d to mak e sur e every fligh t i s asaf e one . I encourag e you an dth e FAA t o revisi t thes e rule s t o add mor e res t tim e an d no t

increas e fligh

t time
. W e can' t affor dto mak e amistak e wit

h thes e rule s - to o man y live s depen d o n gettin g i t right
. Thank yo u fo r you r time
. Thoma s Erchu l20 1 Mountai n Par k Blv dS W C20 3 Issaquah , W

A 9802 7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:96cr57-03/RV

CHARLES RANDALL HARRISON

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Senior Judge Roger Vinson on July 10, 2007

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION for reconsideration and clarification 

Filed by Defendant (pro se) on 6/18/2007 Doc.# 436

RESPONSES:

 None on Doc.# 

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

 Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

 s/Jerry Marbut

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Jerry Marbut

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 10th day of

 July , 2007, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) Booker has no effect on the defendant’s sentence or this Court’s 

jurisdiction.

 /s/ Roger Vinson

ROGER VINSON

Senior United States District Judge

Case 3:96-cr-00057-RV-MD Document 437 Filed 07/10/07 Page 1 of 1
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAn atlas of ECMWF analyses (1980-1987). Part 2: Second moment quantitiesThis document is an atlas based on European Center for Medium Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) initialized analyses for 1980-1987. Transports and variance are presented globally at 200 and 850 mb as well as zonally averaged for seasonal and annual averages. Selected fields are filtered to isolate the synoptic (2.5 days is less than periods is less than 6 days) and low frequency (10 days is less than periods is less than 90 days) regions of the spectrum. In addition, time series of the zonally and monthly averaged transports and variances are presented over the entire 8 year period.Document ID19900016135Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsSchubert, S.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD., United States)*Higgins, W.*(National Academy of Sciences - National Research Council Washington, DC., United States)*Park, C.-K.*(Centel Federal Services Corp. Reston, VA., United States)*Moorthi, S.*(Universities Space Research Association Columbia, MD., United States)*Suarez, M.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1990Subject CategoryMeteorology And ClimatologyReport/Patent NumberREPT-90E02172NAS 1.15:100762-PT-2NASA-TM-100762-PT-2Accession Number90N25451Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900016135.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 3201.26 Lip care products. ( a ) *Definition.* Personal care products formulated to replenish the moisture and/or prevent drying of the lips.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The preferred procurement product must have a biobased content of at least 82 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than May 14, 2009, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased lip care products. By that date, Federal agencies that have the responsibility for drafting or reviewing specifications for items to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased lip care products.
[73 FR 27973, May 14, 2008]
```

[108th Congress Public Law 418]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ418.108]
Public Law 108-418
108th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To amend the Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act of 
1992 to increase the Federal share of the costs of the San Gabriel Basin 
     demonstration project. <<NOTE: Nov. 30, 2004 -  [H.R. 1284]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN FEDERAL SHARE OF SAN GABRIEL BASIN DEMONSTRATION 
            PROJECT.

    Section 1631(d)(2) of the Reclamation Projects Authorization and 
Adjustment Act of 1992 (43 U.S.C. 390h-13) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``In the case'' and inserting ``(A) Subject 
        to subparagraph (B), in the case''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:

    ``(B) In the case of the San Gabriel Basin demonstration project 
authorized by section 1614, the Federal share of the cost of such 
project may not exceed the sum determined by adding--
            ``(i) the amount that applies to that project under 
        subparagraph (A); and
            ``(ii) $6,500,000.''.

    Approved November 30, 2004.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1284:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 108-204 (Comm. on Resources).
SENATE REPORTS: No. 108-331 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 149 (2003):
                                    Sept. 16, considered and passed 
                                        House.
                                                        Vol. 150 (2004):
                                    Sept. 15, considered and passed 
                                        Senate, amended.
                                    Nov. 17, House concurred in Senate 
                                        amendment.

                                  <all>
```
§ 370.7 Agency response to requests. ( a ) The response to requests for information and to appeals shall be made in accordance with the Department regulations in § 1.5 of this title and the regulations in this part.
( b ) Requests for records and information which have customarily been directed to field stations and agency headquarters may continue to be directed to those locations, notwithstanding the provisions of these regulations. If the information is not available at the location at which the request is made, or the official receiving the request is in doubt as to whether the information should be released, the official shall ( 1 ) promptly forward the request to the FOIA Coordinator, or
( 2 ) inform the requester of the procedures established in these regulations by which the request may be sent directly to the FOIA Coordinator. The date of receipt of the request by the Coordinator shall be the determining date for purposes of the time limitations under the Freedom of Information Act and the regulations.
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS

*May 2, 2006*

[Cite as *05/02/2006 Case Announcements,*2006-Ohio-2158.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2005-1228.

#### O’Connor v. Cleveland Clinic Found.

Cuyahoga App. No. 84219,161 Ohio App.3d 43, 2005-Ohio-2328. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County. Upon consideration of appellee’s motion for a continuance of oral argument,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion is denied.
/*     FILE ARCHIVED ON 20:40:43 Jun 15, 2006 AND RETRIEVED FROM THE     INTERNET ARCHIVE ON 14:44:36 Mar 5, 2012.     JAVASCRIPT APPENDED BY WAYBACK MACHINE, COPYRIGHT INTERNET ARCHIVE.     ALL OTHER CONTENT MAY ALSO BE PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT (17 U.S.C.     SECTION 108(a)(3)).*/// $Id: buyusa.js 316 2006-04-09 20:55:50Z cmil $var idSearchField  = 'bu-search-field';var idContentDiv   = 'bu-content';var idArticleDiv   = 'article';function init () {    initSearch(idSearchField);    if(window.footnoteLinks) {        footnoteLinks(idArticleDiv, idContentDiv,                      'footnote-links', excludeFromFootnotes);    }}function initSearch (id) {    var field = document.getElementById(id);    if(!field) return;    var searchDefault = field.value;    field.onfocus = function () {        if(this.value == searchDefault) this.value = '';        else this.select();    }    field.onblur  = function () {        if(this.value == '') this.value = searchDefault;    }                                               }function excludeFromFootnotes (elem) {    if (!elem.tagName == 'A') return false;    var test = document.URL + '#';    if (elem.href.indexOf(test) === 0) return true;    if (elem.parentNode.className == 'toc'        || elem.parentNode.parentNode.parentNode.className == 'toc') return true;    return false;}window.onload = init;
#### Abe Steinbrecher, Respondent-Appellant, v. Public Service Mutual Insurance Company, Appellant-Respondent.

Order entered February 16, 1966 unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of granting defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and, as so modified, affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to defendant-appellant-respondent. Appeal from order entered April 22, 1966 unanimously dismissed as academic, without cost and without disbursements. In 1959 plaintiff commenced an action against one Wapnick for fraud and deceit. Simultaneously therewith an order of arrest was served (Civ. Prac. Act, § 826). Wapnick was released when the defendant herein, as surety, executed an undertaking *725in the sum of $33,925. That instrument, so far as here material, provided that Wapniek would *“*at all times render himself amenable to any mandate which may be issued to enforce final judgment against him in [the] action.” In 1961 plaintiff obtained judgment against Wapniek in a sum in excess of the amount specified in the undertaking and that judgment was affirmed by this court (20 A D 2d 969). Meanwhile and in February, 1962 Wapniek was convicted of criminal charges in a United States District Court and was confined in a Federal penitentiary from July, 1963 to February, 1966. Plaintiff having failed to collect the money judgment from Wapniek commenced this action against the surety seeking to recover the penal sum of the undertaking. The gravamen thereof was that the surety had breached its promise that Wapniek would at all times render himself amenable to process to enforce the final judgment. “ The general rule is that if the principal on a bail bond given in a civil action is in prison for a criminal or other charge at the time designated for his appearance, the bail cannot be held liable for a failure to produce him”. (8 Am. Jur., 2d Bail and Recognizance, § 195; *Yancey*v. *Lowe,*47 N. J. Super. 86.) See, also, *People*v. *Tubbs,*37 N. Y. 586; *People*v. *Peerless Ins. Co.,*21 A D 2d 609, 618. It follows that the condition of the bond was impossible of performance by defendant while Wapniek' was incarcerated. Moreover, it is not disputed that Wapniek has been at liberty and residing in this State for the past year. Thus, he has been available during that time so that plaintiff could pursue available procedures for satisfaction of the judgment. Concur—Steuer, J. P., Capozzoli, Tilzer, McNally and Bastow, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Keyuan Petrochemiclas, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report’), I, Chunfeng Tao, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)T he information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.








Date:  November 15, 2010





/s/ Chunfeng Tao


Chunfeng Tao


Chief Executive Officer & Chairman
#### HUDSON & M. RY. CO. v. WENDEL.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 25, 1906.)

Action by the Hudson & Manhattan Railway Company against Josephine J. S. Wendel.

No opinion. Motion for stay denied, on conditions stated in memorandum per curiam. Settle order on notice.
# United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________ No. 17-2757

___________________________ Michael Lavern Boyd, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant , v. Doe, Health Services Administrator, lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant , Greg Rechcigl, AHSA, East Arkansas Reg ional Unit; Amanda Sackett, Nurse, EARU (originally named as Sackett); Kenneth L. Holder, lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
.

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena

____________ Submitted: July 26, 2018 Filed: December 28, 2018 [Unpublished]

____________ Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

____________PER CURIAM. Arkansas inmate Michael Boyd brought a civil rights action against state corrections officials under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court granted summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, see 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), and Boyd appeals. We review the decision de novo
. King v. Iowa Dep’t of Corr. , 598 F.3d 1051, 1052 (2010). We conclude that a genuine dispute of ma terial fact remains as to whether Boyd exhausted administrative remedies that were available to him. A corrections official rejected Boyd’s grievance appeal on th e ground that he did not send all proper attachments—namely, the unit level grieva nce form and two other attachments that called for his name, his inmate number, and the date. But Boyd swore in his complaint and in his objections to the magi strate judge’s recommendation that he had submitted all necessary grievance attachments, and that corrections officials had not returned the attachments to him. Further, the form that Boyd used to appeal the grievance determination did not show that he was required to include his name, Arkansas Department of Correction numbe r, and date or include spaces for that information. There is a material disput e, therefore, about whether Boyd complied with the exhaustion requirement, either by submitting all of the required attachments at the appeal stage or by submitting whatever attachments were available to him after officials failed to return some forms to him with the decision on his grievance. A record keeper’s declaration that a prisoner did not exhaust a grievance is insufficient to establish non-exhaustion as a matter of law when the prisoner makes sworn assertions that he took the n ecessary steps to exhaust. See Conner v. Doe , 285 F. App’x 304, 304 (8th Cir. 2008). Accordingly, the judgment is reversed, and the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings. Boyd’s motion for an evidentiary hearing in the court of appeals is denied.

______________________________ -2-
MEDIATION REFERRALS

2006-0778.

#### State ex rel. Roddy v. Indus. Comm.

Franklin App. No. 04AP-930, 2006-Ohio-1185.

The following case has been referred to mediation pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(6):
Exhibit32.1

****

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,  **

**asadopted pursuant to**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**** 

**** 

****

In connection with the Annual Report of TheragenicsCorporation®, (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year endedDecember 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, M. Christine Jacobs, President and ChiefExecutive Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods referred to in theReport.

 

 

By: /s/ M.Christine Jacobs

M. ChristineJacobs

Chief ExecutiveOfficer

March 15,2005

 

A signed original ofthis written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to TheragenicsCorporation® and will be retained by TheragenicsCorporation® and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.
2005-1564.

#### Natl. City Bank v. Wilkins.

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2003-A-1329. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals. Upon consideration of appellant’s request for oral argument,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the request is granted.
98-597.

#### State ex rel. Soukup v. Celebrezze.

Cuyahoga App. No. 72008. On motion to stay or hold in abeyance lower court proceedings. Motion denied.

Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.
Exhibit 31.1
                         CERTIFICATION

I, Greg Amato, certify that:

     1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of
Epolin, Inc.;

     2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;

     4.   The small business issuer's other certifying officers
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-
15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

          (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,
or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;

          (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business
issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and

          (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the small
business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal
quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the
case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonable likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

     5.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s)
and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the small business
issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business
issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

          (a)  All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

          (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the
small business issuer's internal control over financial
reporting.



Dated:  May 24, 2007          By:  /s/ Greg Amato
                                   Greg Amato, Chief Executive
                                   Officer
                                   (Principal Executive Officer)