alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, T. Scott Conley, thechief executive officer of O2 Secure Wireless, Inc., certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this quarterlyreport on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 of O2 SecureWireless, Inc.;

(2) Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3) Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer asof, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4) The small businessissuer’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in thisreport any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

(5) The small businessissuer’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the smallbusiness issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significantdeficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small businessissuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

(b) Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Dated: May 15, 2007 | /s/ T. Scott Conley                                    |
|---------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                | T. Scott Conley,  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
4.201 Procedures.

Contracting officers shall distribute copies of contracts or modifications within 10 working days

after execution by all parties. As a minimum, the contracting officer shall-

(a) Distribute simultaneously one signed copy or reproduction of the signed contract to the

contractor and the paying office;

(b) When a contract is assigned to another office for contract administration (see subpart 42.2),

provide to that office-

(1) One copy or reproduction of the signed contract and of each modification; and

(2) A copy of the contract distribution list, showing those offices that should receive copies of

modifications, and any changes to the list as they occur;

(c) Distribute one copy to each accounting and finance office (funding office) whose funds are cited

in the contract;

(d) When the contract is not assigned for administration but contains a Cost Accounting Standards

clause, provide one copy of the contract to the cognizant administrative contracting officer and mark

the copy "For Cost Accounting Standards Administration Only" (see 30.601(b));

(e) Provide one copy of each contract or modification that requires audit service to the appropriate

field audit office listed in the "Directory of Federal Contract Audit Offices" (see 42.103); and

(f) Provide copies of contracts and modifications to those organizations required to perform contract

administration support functions (e.g., when manufacturing is performed at multiple sites, the

contract administration office cognizant of each location).

Parent topic: Subpart 4.2 - Contract Distribution
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.38

                       AMENDMENT TO DEMAND NOTE ADDENDUM

Southfield, Michigan
Date: February 17, 2005

This Amendment to Addendum is effective as of November 12, 2004 and incorporated
and made a part of the Demand Note (the "Note") by and among Robert S. Cubbin
and Kathleen D. Cubbin ("Borrowers") and Meadowbrook, Inc. ("Lender") dated
November 9, 1998 and modifies the Addendum to the Note dated March 1, 1999.

All references to "Revolving Credit Agreement with Comerica Bank, dated July 24,
1998" shall be replaced by "Credit Agreement with Standard Federal Bank,
National Association, dated November 12, 2004.


WITNESSED:

    /s/ Michael G. Costello                            /s/ Robert S. Cubbin
---------------------------                   ------------------------------
                                              ROBERT S. CUBBIN


                                                       /s/ Kathleen D. Cubbin
---------------------------                   -------------------------------
                                              KATHLEEN D. CUBBIN
§ 319.55-6 Inspection and disinfection at port of arrival. ( a ) [Reserved]
( b ) *Rice straw and rice hulls.* ( 1 ) As a condition of entry, rice straw and rice hulls shall be subject to inspection and to treatment in accordance with part 305 of this chapter at the port of arrival, under the supervision of the inspector, by methods and at plants approved by the Plant Protection and Quarantine Programs and, as a further condition of entry, in order to permit effective treatment in accordance with part 305 of this chapter, the contents of packages or bales shall not be compressed to a density of more than 30 pounds per cubic foot. Rice straw and rice hulls will be admitted only at ports where adequate facilities are available for such treatment. The required treatment must be given within 20 days after arrival, but if any shipment of rice straw or rice hulls shall be found upon arrival to be dangerously infested or infected the inspector may direct immediate treatment under adequate safeguards; and, if the treatment and safeguards are not put into effect as directed, the shipment shall be removed from the country immediately or destroyed.
( 2 ) Unless, within 20 days after the date of arrival of a shipment at the port at which the formal entry was filed, the importation has received the required treatment, due notice of which shall be given to the collector of customs by the inspector, demand will be made by the collector for redelivery of the shipment into customs custody under the terms of the entry bond, and, if such redelivery is not made, the shipment shall be removed from the country or destroyed.
( 3 ) All charges for storage, cartage, and labor incident to inspection and disinfection, other than the services of the inspector, shall be paid by the importer.
( 4 ) All shipments shall be so baled, bagged, or wrapped as to prevent scattering or wastage. If, in the judgment of the inspector, a shipment is not so bagged, baled, or wrapped, it shall be reconditioned at the expense of the permittee or entry may be refused.
[24 FR 10788, Dec. 29, 1959, as amended at 75 FR 4252, Jan. 26, 2010; 83 FR 11865, Mar. 19, 2018]
7.107-6 Solicitation provision.

The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 52.207-6, Solicitation of Offers from Small

Business Concerns and Small Business Teaming Arrangements or Joint Ventures (Multiple-Award

Contracts), in solicitations for multiple-award contracts above the substantial bundling threshold of

the agency (see 7.107-4(a)).

Parent topic: 7.107 Additional requirements for acquisitions involving consolidation, bundling, or

substantial bundling.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Dallas Taylor, Appellant.

In a *coram nobis*proceeding, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 21, 1966, which denied the application. Order reversed, on the law, and proceeding remitted to said court for a new hearing before a Justice other than the Justice who presided at defendant’s trial which resulted in the judgment of conviction in question. The findings of fact below have not been considered. In our opinion, appellant’s testimony at the hearing was improperly restricted on the question of his alleged intoxication at the time he made the statement (cf. *People*v. *Schompert,*19 N Y 2d 300, 305) and his attorney was improperly restricted in eliciting testimony regarding a possible stenographic record of questioning by an Assistant District Attorney shortly after the challenged statement was allegedly made (cf. *People*v. *Robles,*29 A D 2d 751). We do not pass on the other errors assigned since a new hearing is to be held, but we note in passing that, if any issue is to be raised as to appellant’s present mental condition, it should be determined before a hearing on the merits begins (cf. *People*v. *Harrison,*28 A D 2d 1097). Beldock, P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to
      Section**  **906**


**of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





The
      undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
      Report on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2007 of Naturade,
      Inc. (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the
      information contained in such periodic report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as
      of, and for, the periods presented in such report.





/s/
                Adam MichelinAdam
                Michelin*Chief
                Executive Officer*April
                15, 2008





**A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
      been**  **provided
      to the Company and it will be retained by the Company and furnished
      to**  **the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff on request** .
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 6, 2020

Order 

Clerk

March 6, 2020

160183(41)

ORAS TAYLOR, Personal Representative 

of the ESTATE OF EFFIE TAYLOR,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 160183

v COA: 338801

Oakland CC: 2015-147003-NH

UNIVERSITY PHYSICIAN GROUP, LEGACY

SHGD, VHS SINAI GRACE HOSPITAL, INC.,

TENET HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, VHS

OF MICHIGAN, INC., VHS PHYSICIANS OF

MICHIGAN, DMC LAHSER AMBULATORY,

and DMC LAHSER CAMPUS,

Defendants

and

FRANKLIN MEDICAL CONSULTANTS, PC,

and MANUEL SKLAR,

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the Michigan State Medical Society to 

file a brief amicus curiae is GRANTED. The revised amicus brief submitted on March 3, 

2020, is accepted for filing.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Morlex, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB
      for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Miller,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/
                Michael MillerMichael
                Miller
              Principal
                Executive Officer
              Principal
                Financial Officer
              February
                14, 2007
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dolce Ventures, Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the period ending  September  30, 2005, as filed with the  Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  John  F.
Passalaqua,  Treasurer/Secretary of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


By: /s/ John F. Passalaqua
--------------------------
John F. Passalaqua
Treasurer and Secretary
(Principal Financial Officer)

November 11, 2005


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 29.2541 Packing.

A lot of tobacco consisting of a number of packages submitted as one definite unit for sampling or inspection. It is represented to contain the same kind of tobacco and has a common identification number or mark on each package.

[37 FR 13626, July 12, 1972. Redesignated at 49 FR 16757, Apr. 20, 1984]
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-HTC Document 5 Filed 06/15/20 Page 1 of 17
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-HTC Document 5 Filed 06/15/20 Page 2 of 17
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-HTC Document 5 Filed 06/15/20 Page 3 of 17
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-HTC Document 5 Filed 06/15/20 Page 4 of 17
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-HTC Document 5 Filed 06/15/20 Page 5 of 17
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-HTC Document 5 Filed 06/15/20 Page 6 of 17
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-HTC Document 5 Filed 06/15/20 Page 7 of 17
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-HTC Document 5 Filed 06/15/20 Page 8 of 17
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-HTC Document 5 Filed 06/15/20 Page 9 of 17
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-HTC Document 5 Filed 06/15/20 Page 10 of 17
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-HTC Document 5 Filed 06/15/20 Page 11 of 17
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-HTC Document 5 Filed 06/15/20 Page 12 of 17
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-HTC Document 5 Filed 06/15/20 Page 13 of 17
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-HTC Document 5 Filed 06/15/20 Page 14 of 17
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-HTC Document 5 Filed 06/15/20 Page 15 of 17
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-HTC Document 5 Filed 06/15/20 Page 16 of 17
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-HTC Document 5 Filed 06/15/20 Page 17 of 17
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

DREAM DEFENDERS, et al.

Plaintiffs,

v. CASE No. 1:20-cv-67-RH-GRJ

LAUREL M. LEE, et al.,

Defendants.

________________________________/

KIRK NIELSEN, et al.,

Plaintiffs, CASE No. 4:20-cv-236-RH-MJF

v.

LAUREL M. LEE, et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________________/

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is ECF No. 123, Plaintiffs’ Motion for 

Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Jennifer Lai-Peterson.

Jennifer Lai-Peterson, a Senior Attorney at Advancement Project 

National Office in Washington, D.C., requests permission to appear pro hac 

vice as co-counsel for Plaintiffs Dream Defenders. The movant completed 

the computer-based tutorial for attorney admission and the tutorial on this 

Case 1:20-cv-00067-RH-GRJ Document 124 Filed 07/07/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Court’s CM/ECF system. Movant has also paid the necessary filing fee. 

She has attached a certificate of good standing from the State Bar of 

California.

Therefore, upon due consideration, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Admission 

Pro Hac Vice of Jennifer Lai-Peterson , ECF No. 123, is GRANTED. 

Jennifer Lai-Peterson is permitted to appear in this action as co-counsel for 

Plaintiffs Dream Defenders and receive electronic filings in this case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 7th day of July 2020.

s/Gary R. Jones 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:20-cv-00067-RH-GRJ Document 124 Filed 07/07/20 Page 2 of 2
§ 400.704 Covered by this subpart. ( a ) An applicant may submit to the Board, in accordance with § 400.705, a 508(h) submission that is: ( 1 ) A policy or plan of insurance not currently reinsured by FCIC;
( 2 ) One or more proposed revisions to a policy or plan of insurance authorized under the Act; or
( 3 ) Rates of premium for any policy or plan of insurance authorized under the Act.
( b ) An applicant must submit to the Board, any significant change to a previously approved 508(h) submission, including requests for expansion, prior to making the change in accordance with § 400.705.
( c ) An applicant may submit a concept proposal to the Board prior to developing a full 508(h) submission, in accordance with this subpart and the Procedures Handbook 17030—Approved Procedures for Submission of Concept Proposals Seeking Advance Payment of Research and Development Costs, which can be found on the RMA Web site at *www.rma.usda.gov .*
( d ) An applicant who is an approved insurance provider may submit an index-based weather plan of insurance for consideration as a pilot program in accordance with this subpart and the Procedures Handbook 17050—Approved Procedures for Submission of Index-based Weather Plans of Insurance, which can be found on the RMA Web site at *www.rma.usda.gov .*
( e ) An applicant must submit a non-reinsured supplemental policy or endorsement to RMA in accordance with § 400.713.
|  |  | [if !vml]>[endif]>

You have  reached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection  (FDLP/EC) Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the  FDLP/EC. Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's  suite of cataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S.  Government Publications (CGP).
Title: **Drugs of    abuse**
SuDocs Number: J    24.2:D 84/
Item Number: 0967    (online)
GPO System Number: 000948630
 
 
 
 
 
2005 | 2011    | 2017
 
 
 
 
A service of the Superintendent of Documents,  U.S. Government Printing Office..

 

 
Last updated:  August 29,  2017  Page Name:  http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/
 
  |
|--|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO. 4:02cr36-SPM/AK

JASEN ALLEN BADIA,

Defendant.

__________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s report

and recommendation dated February 19, 2008 (doc. 128). Defendant has been

furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and he has filed objections 

(130). Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), I find that the

report and recommendation is correct and should be adopted. Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 128) is

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Defendant’s motion to vacate (doc. 83) is denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 13th day of March, 2008.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 4:02-cr-00036-SPM-AK Document 132 Filed 03/13/08 Page 1 of 1
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION N o. 04

- 24

- 00248

- CR

Serena JOSEPH , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 379th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2023CR11216 Honorable Ron Rangel , Judge Presiding PER CURIAM Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios , Justice Delivered and Filed: June 5, 2024 DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION On March 19, 2024, the trial court filed an order for evaluation of competency, which is not an appealable judgment. See Sanchez v. State , No. 04

- 18

- 00281

- CR, 2018 WL 2418432, at *1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio May 30, 2018, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (citing Jackson v. State , No. 01

- 13

- 00561

- CR, 2014 WL 123838, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] Jan. 14, 2014, no pet.); Woods v. State , 108 S.W.3d 314, 316 n.6 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003); T EX . C ODE C RIM . P ROC . art. 46B.011)

. On April 1, 2024, Appellant filed a notice of appeal.04

- 24

- 00248

- CR

- 2

- On April 16, 2024, we ordered Appellant to show cause as to why this court should not dism iss for want of jurisdiction. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 43.2(f). Appellant did not respond. Because the order for evaluation of competency is not an appealable order, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See id. ; Sanchez , 2018 WL 2418432, at *1

. PER CURIAM DO NOT PUBLISH