Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 24, 2010 / Notices 71783 

8 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 

1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 

2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 

3Exchange Rule 11.9(b)(1) provides that (prior to 

display of an order to a User), an incoming order 

shall first attempt to be matched for execution 

against orders in the EDGA Book. 

4Exchange Rule 1.5(cc) defines a User as ‘‘any 

Member or Sponsored Participant who is 

authorized to obtain access to the System pursuant 

to Rule 11.3.’’ 

printing in the Commission’s Public 

Reference Room, on official business 

days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 

3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be 

available for inspection and copying at 

the principal office of the Exchange. All 

comments received will be posted 

without change; the Commission does 

not edit personal identifying 

information from submissions. You 

should submit only information that 

you wish to make available publicly. All 

submissions should refer to File 

Number SR–EDGX–2010–17 and should 

be submitted on or before December 15, 

2010. 

For the Commission, by the Division of 

Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated 

authority.8

Florence E. Harmon, 

Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2010–29591 Filed 11–23–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[Release No. 34–63335; File No. SR–EDGA– 

2010–18] 

Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGA 

Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing of 

Proposed Rule Change To Amend 

EDGA Rules 11.9(b)(1)(C) and 

11.5(c)(7) Regarding Step-Up Orders 

November 18, 2010. 

Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the 

‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2

notice is hereby given that on November 

8, 2010, EDGA Exchange, Inc. (the 

‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGA’’) filed with the 

Securities and Exchange Commission 

(the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule 

change as described in Items I and II 

below, which Items have been prepared 

by the Exchange. The Commission is 

publishing this notice to solicit 

comments on the proposed rule change 

from interested persons. 

I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Terms of Substance of 

the Proposed Rule Change 

The Exchange proposes to amend 

EDGA Rule 11.9(b)(1)(C) regarding the 

description of the Step-up order type. 

The Exchange also proposes to 

introduce Rule 11.5(c)(7) to allow MidPoint Match orders entered in response 

to Step-up orders to be processed 

pursuant to Rule 11.9(b)(1)(C).). The text 

of the proposed rule change is available 

on the Exchange’s Internet Web site at 

http://www.directedge.com, at the 

principal office of the Exchange, and at 

the Commission’s Public Reference 

Room. 

II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Purpose of, and 

Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 

Change 

In its filing with the Commission, the 

Exchange included statements 

concerning the purpose of, and basis for, 

the proposed rule change and discussed 

any comments it received on the 

proposed rule change. The text of these 

statements may be examined at the 

places specified in Item IV below. The 

self-regulatory organization has 

prepared summaries, set forth in 

Sections A, B and C below, of the most 

significant aspects of such statements. 

A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Purpose of, and the 

Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 

Change 

1. Purpose 

Exchange Rule 11.5(c)(11) defines a 

Step-up order as a ‘‘market or limit order 

with the instruction that the System 

display the order to Users at or within 

the NBBO price pursuant to Rule 

11.9(b)(1)(C).’’ Exchange Rule 

11.9(b)(1)(C), in turn, states that orders 

shall be displayed to Users 3 (hereinafter 

referred to as ‘‘Members’’),4 in a manner 

that is separately identifiable from other 

Exchange orders, at or within the NBBO 

price for a period of time not to exceed 

five hundred milliseconds as 

determined by the Exchange (the ‘‘Stepup Display Period).’’ The Step-up 

Display Period is currently set at 25 

milliseconds. 

The Exchange proposes to amend 

Rule 11.9(b)(1)(C) to add language to the 

rule text which will provide that at the 

conclusion of the Step-up Display 

Period, the Step-up order shall execute 

against responsive User orders priced at 

or within the NBBO, prevailing at the 

end of the Step-up Display Period on a 

price/time priority basis consistent with 

Rule 11.8(a)(1) and (2). Rules 11.8(a)(1) 

and (2), in turn, provide that orders of 

Users shall be ranked and maintained in 

the EDGA Book based on the following 

priority: (i) The highest-priced order to 

buy (or lowest-priced order to sell) shall 

have priority over all other orders to buy 

(or orders to sell); (ii) where orders to 

buy (or sell) are made at the same price, 

the order clearly established as the first 

entered into the System at such 

particular price shall have precedence at 

that price, up to the number of shares 

of stock specified in the order. 

Commencing on the six month 

anniversary of {Insert Commission 

approval date of this rule filing}, the 

orders eligible for executing against 

Step-up orders shall be expanded to 

include User orders priced better but 

not outside the NBBO at the end of the 

Step-up Display Period (such orders, 

‘‘Eligible Book Orders’’). 

In effect, Step-up orders permit a 

Member to initiate a price auction of 

such orders by displaying order 

solicitation information to other 

Members simultaneously, provided 

such other Members have elected to 

receive such order information (each 

such Member, an ‘‘Electing Member.’’). 

After the passage of the Step-up Display 

Period, the Step-up orders are executed 

against responses and, commencing on 

the six month anniversary of {Insert 

Commission approval date of this rule 

filing}, Eligible Book Orders, on a price/ 

time priority basis in accordance with 

Rule 11.8(a)(1) and (2). Responses are 

accumulated for the Step-up Display 

Period by the Exchange, rather than 

processed at arrival time. Eligible Book 

Orders will continue to be eligible for 

execution against the EDGA Book 

during the Step-up Display Period. 

For example, assume the NBBO 

(national best bid/offer) is 10.10 x 10.12. 

If Member A enters a Step-up order to 

buy 500 shares of ABC security at the 

prevailing national best offer ($10.12) 

and such Step-up order cannot execute 

against the EDGA Book, then Electing 

Members will receive a solicitation to 

sell 500 shares of ABC security at $10.12 

or lower. If Electing Members X, Y, and 

Z transmit an order to sell 500 shares (or 

less) of ABC security at the prevailing 

national best offer or lower (i.e., $10.12 

or lower), within the Step-up Display 

Period, they would all participate in a 

price auction, which would be awarded 

at the end of the Step-up Display Period 

on a price/time priority basis based on 

the prevailing NBBO at the end of such 

time period. Therefore, if EDGA receives 

an order to sell 500 shares at $10.11 

from Electing Member X, then receives 

an order to sell 200 shares at $10.10 

from Electing Member Y and lastly 

receives an order to sell 200 shares at 

$10.11 from Electing Member Z, 

Electing Member Y would have priority 

over Electing Members X and Z based 

on price priority, assuming that such 

orders were received within the Step-up 

Display Period. As a result, Electing 

Member Y’s order would execute 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES

71784 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 24, 2010 / Notices 

5 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). 

6 15 U.S.C. 78k–1(a)(1). 

7The text of the proposed rule change is available 

on the Commission’s Web site at http:// 

www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml. 

against Member A’s Step-up order for 

200 shares at $10.10. The remaining 300 

shares would be awarded to Electing 

Member X at $10.11, since Electing 

Member X has time priority over 

Electing Member Z. Following the six 

month anniversary of {Insert 

Commission approval date of this rule 

filing}, if non-electing Member W had 

an order to sell 500 shares at $10.11 that 

was entered before Electing Member X’s 

order and it was not otherwise executed 

on the EDGX Book prior to the end of 

the Step-up Display Period, then the 

remaining 300 shares in the above 

example would be executed against 

Member W’s order, since Member W 

would have time priority over both 

Electing Members X and Z. 

The Exchange believes that this 

proposed amendment provides more 

transparency regarding the timing 

associated with the price auction. 

The Exchange also proposes to add a 

new order type as Rule 11.5(c)(7) to 

allow Mid-Point Match orders that are 

entered in response to Step-up orders to 

be eligible for execution pursuant to 

Rule 11.9(b)(1)(C), as described above. 

As proposed, the Mid-Point Match order 

would be ‘‘an order with an instruction 

to execute it at the midpoint of the 

NBBO.’’ This order type differs from the 

Mid-Point Peg order in that it can only 

be used in response to a Step-up order 

type, whereas the Mid-Point Peg order 

can be entered as a limit order but 

cannot be used in response to a Step-up 

order. Further, the Mid-Point Peg order 

can execute at a price better than the 

midpoint of the NBBO, while the MidPoint Match order will be time-stamped 

and priced at the end of the Step-up 

Display Period. 

In response to the price auction 

described above, the Exchange will not 

accept orders priced in subpennies. The 

respondent User could enter a MidPoint Match order, however, that would 

be eligible for execution at the midpoint 

of the prevailing NBBO at the end of the 

Step-up Display Period. 

The Exchange believes the midpoint 

response described above will provide 

an additional pricing mechanism for the 

respondent User that is willing to offer 

price improvement, but is unwilling to 

cross the spread between the national 

best bid and offer to do so. By providing 

this option, the Exchange believes that 

a greater proportion of Step-up orders 

will receive price improvement. In 

addition, because the midpoint response 

will execute all trades at the midpoint 

of the NBBO, it will never execute a 

trade outside of the NBBO. If the 

national best bid for a security 

underlying a Step-up order equals or 

‘‘locks’’ the national best offer for such 

security, a Mid-Point Match order 

response will execute all trades at the 

locked price. 

The Step-up order process will not 

generate an execution if the national 

best bid (offer) for the security 

underlying a Step-up order is priced 

better than or ‘‘crosses’’ the national best 

offer (bid) for such security. In the event 

of a ‘‘crossed’’ market or an absence of 

responsive User orders at or within the 

NBBO and, commencing on the six 

month anniversary of {Insert 

Commission approval date of this rule 

filing}, Eligible Book Orders at the end 

of the Step-up Display Period, the Stepup process shall terminate and the Stepup order shall be cancelled or routed in 

accordance with the User’s instructions. 

Other Technical Amendments 

The Exchange proposes to make 

conforming changes to the numbering of 

current rules 11.5(c)(7)–(14) to (c)(8)– 

(15) as a result of the insertion of the 

Mid-Point Match order type in Rule 

11.5(c)(7), as described above. Similarly, 

the references to the newly numbered 

rules are also proposed to be amended 

in Rule 11.5(c) and Rule 11.8(a)(2)(C). 

2. Statutory Basis 

The statutory basis for the proposed 

rule change is Section 6(b)(5) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the 

‘‘Act’’),5 which requires the rules of an 

exchange to promote just and equitable 

principles of trade, to remove 

impediments to and perfect the 

mechanism of a free and open market 

and a national market system and, in 

general, to protect investors and the 

public interest. The proposed rule 

change also is designed to support the 

principles of Section 11A(a)(1) 6 of the 

Act in that it seeks to assure fair 

competition among brokers and dealers 

and among exchange markets. The 

Exchange believes that the proposed 

rule meets these requirements in that it 

seeks to promote the efficient execution 

of investor transactions, and thus 

investor confidence, over the long term 

by providing additional transparency 

relating to the execution of Step-up 

orders. 

B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement on Burden on Competition 

The proposed rule change does not 

impose any burden on competition that 

is not necessary or appropriate in 

furtherance of the purposes of the Act. 

C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement on Comments on the 

Proposed Rule Change Received From 

Members, Participants, or Others 

The Exchange has not solicited, and 

does not intend to solicit, comments on 

this proposed rule change. The 

Exchange has not received any 

unsolicited written comments from 

members or other interested parties. 

III. Date of Effectiveness of the 

Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 

Commission Action 

Within 45 days of the date of 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register or within such longer period 

(i) as the Commission may designate up 

to 90 days of such date if it finds such 

longer period to be appropriate and 

publishes its reasons for so finding or 

(ii) as to which the self-regulatory 

organization consents, the Commission 

will: 

(A) By order approve or disapprove 

such proposed rule change, or 

(B) institute proceedings to determine 

whether the proposed rule change 

should be disapproved. 

IV. Solicitation of Comments 

Interested persons are invited to 

submit written data, views, and 

arguments concerning the foregoing, 

including whether the proposed rule 

change is consistent with the Act. 

Comments may be submitted by any of 

the following methods: 

Electronic Comments 

• Use the Commission’s Internet 

comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ 

rules/sro.shtml); or 

• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File 

Number SR–EDGA–2010–18 on the 

subject line. 

Paper Comments 

• Send paper comments in triplicate 

to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, 

Securities and Exchange Commission, 

100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 

20549–1090. 

All submissions should refer to File 

Number SR–EDGA–2010–18. This file 

number should be included on the 

subject line if e-mail is used. To help the 

Commission process and review your 

comments more efficiently, please use 

only one method. The Commission will 

post all comments on the Commission’s 

Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ 

rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the 

submission,7 all subsequent 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 226 / Wednesday, November 24, 2010 / Notices 71785 

8 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 

amendments, all written statements 

with respect to the proposed rule 

change that are filed with the 

Commission, and all written 

communications relating to the 

proposed rule change between the 

Commission and any person, other than 

those that may be withheld from the 

public in accordance with the 

provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be 

available for Web site viewing and 

printing in the Commission’s Public 

Reference Room, on official business 

days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 

3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be 

available for inspection and copying at 

the principal office of the Exchange. All 

comments received will be posted 

without change; the Commission does 

not edit personal identifying 

information from submissions. You 

should submit only information that 

you wish to make available publicly. All 

submissions should refer to File 

Number SR–EDGA–2010–18 and should 

be submitted on or before December 15, 

2010. 

For the Commission, by the Division of 

Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated 

authority.8

Florence E. Harmon, 

Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2010–29590 Filed 11–23–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 

Escalate Capital Partners SBIC I, L.P., 

License No. 06/06–0335; Notice 

Seeking Exemption Under Section 312 

of the Small Business Investment Act, 

Conflicts of Interest 

Notice is hereby given that Escalate 

Capital Partners, SBIC I, L.P., 300 W. 6th 

Street, Suite 2250, Austin, TX 78701, a 

Federal Licensee under the Small 

Business Investment Act of 1958, as 

amended (‘‘the Act’’), in connection with 

the financing of a small concern, has 

sought an exemption under Section 312 

of the Act and Section 107.730, 

Financings which Constitute Conflicts 

of Interest of the Small Business 

Administration (‘‘SBA’’) Rules and 

Regulations (13 CFR 107.730). Escalate 

Capital Partners, SBIC I, L.P. proposes to 

provide debt security financing to 

WhaleShark Media, Inc., 515 S. 

Congress Avenue, Suite 700, Austin, TX 

78704. The financing is contemplated to 

provide capital for operations and 

contingent payments to prior 

acquisitions. 

The financing is brought within the 

purview of § 107.730(a)(1) of the 

Regulations because AV–EC Partners I, 

L.P., an Associate of Escalate Capital 

Partners, SBIC I, L.P., owns more than 

ten percent of WhaleShark Media, Inc. 

Therefore, this transaction is considered 

a financing of an Associate requiring an 

exemption. 

Notice is hereby given that any 

interested person may submit written 

comments on the transaction within 

fifteen days of the date of this 

publication to the Associate 

Administrator for Investment, U.S. 

Small Business Administration, 409 

Third Street, SW., Washington, DC 

20416. 

Dated: November 17, 2010. 

Sean Greene, 

Associate Administrator for Investment. 

[FR Doc. 2010–29603 Filed 11–23–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025–01–P 

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 

Senior Executive Service: Performance 

Review Board Members 

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business 

Administration. 

ACTION: Notice of Members for the FY 

2010 Performance Review Board. 

SUMMARY: Title 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4) 

requires each agency to publish 

notification of the appointment of 

individuals who may serve as members 

of that Agency’s Performance Review 

Board (PRB). The following individuals 

have been designated to serve on the FY 

2010 Performance Review Board for the 

U.S. Small Business Administration. 

1. David B. Robbins, Chair, Associate 

Administrator for Management and 

Administration. 

2. Jonathan I. Carver, Chief Financial 

Officer and Associate Administrator for 

Performance Management. 

3. James E. Rivera, Deputy Associate 

Administrator for Disaster Assistance. 

4. Sara D. Lipscomb, General Counsel. 

5. Ana M. Ma, Chief of Staff. 

Karen G. Mills, 

Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 2010–29611 Filed 11–23–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025–01–P 

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Proposed Request and 

Comment Request 

The Social Security Administration 

(SSA) publishes a list of information 

collection packages requiring clearance 

by the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) in compliance with 

Public Law (Pub. L.) 104–13, the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 

effective October 1, 1995. This notice 

includes revisions to OMB-approved 

information collections. 

SSA is soliciting comments on the 

accuracy of the agency’s burden 

estimate; the need for the information; 

its practical utility; ways to enhance its 

quality, utility, and clarity; and ways to 

minimize burden on respondents, 

including the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology. Mail, email, or 

fax your comments and 

recommendations on the information 

collection(s) to the OMB Desk Officer 

and SSA Reports Clearance Officer at 

the following addresses or fax numbers. 

(OMB), Office of Management and 

Budget, Attn: Desk Officer for SSA. 

Fax: 202–395–6974. E-mail address: 

OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov 

(SSA), Social Security Administration, 

DCBFM, Attn: Reports Clearance 

Officer, 1333 Annex Building, 6401 

Security Blvd., Baltimore, MD 21235. 

Fax: 410–965–6400. E-mail address: 

OPLM.RCO@ssa.gov. 

I. The information collections below 

are pending at SSA. SSA will submit 

them to OMB within 60 days from the 

date of this notice. To be sure we 

consider your comments, we must 

receive them no later than January 24, 

2011. Individuals can obtain copies of 

the collection instruments by calling the 

SSA Reports Clearance Officer at 410– 

965–8783 or by writing to the above email address. 

1. Continuing Disability Review 

Report—20 CFR 404.1589, 416.989– 

0960–0072. SSA conducts periodic 

reviews to determine whether 

individuals receiving disability benefits 

continue their entitlement to or 

eligibility for those benefits. SSA 

collects the necessary information on 

Form SSA–454 to complete the review 

for continued disability for current 

Supplemental Security Income 

recipients. SSA conducts reviews on a 

periodic basis depending on the 

respondent’s disability. We obtain 

information on sources of medical 

treatment, participation in vocational 

rehabilitation programs (if any), 

attempts to work (if any), and the 

opinions of individuals regarding 

whether their conditions have 

improved. The respondents are Title II 

and/or Title XVI disability recipients or 

their representatives. 

WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with NOTICES