alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
3

Estimates of National Support for Health R&D by Source or Performer, FY 1986-1995

 (Millions of Dollars)

 

 

Sector 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995

Total of A or B 14,898 16,933 19,003 20,918 23,095 25,886 29,240 31,088 33,399 35,816

 

 A) SOURCE OF FUNDS

 Government 7,924 9,028 9,726 10,629 11,416 12,435 13,660 14,162 15,017 15,846

Federal 6,895 7,847 8,431 9,163 9,791 10,602 11,726 12,108 12,821 13,423

NIH 5,401 6,328 6,847 7,474 8,028 8,780 9,566 9,765 10,338 10,682

 State & Local 1,029 1,182 1,295 1,466 1,625 1,833 1,933 2,054 2,196 2,423

 Industry 6,192 7,105 8,438 9,407 10,719 12,361 14,397 15,711 17,106 18,645

 Private nonprofit 782 800 839 882 960 1,090 1,183 1,215 1,276 1,325

 B) PERFORMER

 

 Higher Education** 5,315 6,049 6,574 7,202 7,697 8,697 9,280 9,640 10, 031 10,757 

 

 Government 2,155 2,388 2,590 2,577 2,863 2,994 3,388 3,466 3,717 3,986

 Federal* 1,848 2,042 2,214 2,162 2,403 2,480 2,838 2,886 3,103 3,328

 State and Local 307 346 376 415 460 514 551 580 614 658

 Industry** 5,297 6,004 6,933 7,903 8,880 10,217 11,743 12,897 14,334 15,371

 Other Domestic** 1,157 1,352 1,462 1,777 1,877 2,048 2,506 2,606 2,705 2,901

 Foreign 975 1,140 1,443 1,459 1,779 1,930 2,323 2,479 2,612 2,801

 * In addition to in-house research, includes program management and direct operations attributable to health R&D.

 ** Federally funded R&D centers are included.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2576 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2576

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and thirteen

                                 An Act

 
 To amend title 49, United States Code, to modify requirements relating 
  to the availability of pipeline safety regulatory documents, and for 
                             other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. AVAILABILITY OF PIPELINE SAFETY REGULATORY DOCUMENTS.
    Section 60102(p) of title 49, United States Code, is amended--
        (1) by striking ``1 year'' and inserting ``3 years'';
        (2) by striking ``guidance or''; and
        (3) by striking ``, on an Internet Web site''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
§ 3560.559 Design and construction requirements. ( a ) *General.* The requirements established in § 3560.60 apply to all applications for off-farm labor housing loans and grants except that seasonal off-farm labor housing that will be occupied for eight months or less per year by migrant farmworkers while they are away from their residence, may be constructed in accordance with Exhibit I of 7 CFR part 1924, subpart A.
( b ) *Additional requirements.* In addition to the requirements established in § 3560.60, it is encouraged that the design of off-farm labor housing incorporate outdoor shower, boot washing station, and/or hose bibb facilities as necessary to protect the resident and the asset from excess dirt and chemical exposure.
( c ) *Davis-Bacon wage requirements.* Construction financed with the assistance of a Section 516 grant will be subject to the provisions of the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 276(a)-276(a)(7)), and the implementing regulations published by the Department of Labor at 29 CFR parts 1, 3, and 5.
#### § 29.3604 Rule 3.

In drawing an official sample from a hogshead or other package of tobacco, three or more breaks shall be made at such points and in such manner as the inspector or sampler may find necessary to determine the kinds of tobacco and the percentage of each kind contained in the lot. All breaks shall be made so that the tobacco contained in the center of the package is visible to the sampler. Tobacco shall be drawn from at least three breaks from which a representative sample shall be selected. The sample shall include tobacco of each different group, quality, color, length, and kind found in the lot in proportion to the quantities of each contained in the lot.

[30 FR 9207, July 23, 1965, as amended at 49 FR 16759, Apr. 20, 1984]
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter C of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter C appear by Amdt. 381, 65 FR 64586, Oct. 30, 2000.

#### § 283.27 Procedures upon failure to file an answer.

The failure by FNS to file an answer shall constitute a waiver of the opportunity to file a cross motion for summary judgment pursuant to § 283.30. Upon such failure to file, the State agency shall file a proposed decision, along with a motion for adoption thereof, both of which shall be served upon FNS by the State agency. Within 10 days after service of such motion and proposed decision, FNS may file with the Hearing Clerk objections thereto. If the ALJ finds that meritorious objections have been filed, the State agency's motion shall be denied with supporting reasons. If meritorious objections are not filed, the ALJ shall issue an initial decision without further procedures. Copies of the decision or denial of State agency's motion shall be served on each of the parties and shall be included as part of the official record. Where the decision as proposed by the State agency is adopted as the ALJ's initial decision, such decision of the ALJ shall become final and effective 30 days after service unless reconsideration or review by the Judicial Officer is sought as discussed in §§ 283.17(d) and 283.20.
Editorial Note on Subchapter C of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter C appear by Amdt. 381, 65 FR 64586, Oct. 30, 2000.

Editorial Note on Part 275
Editorial Note: OMB control numbers relating to this part 275 are contained in § 271.8.

§ 275.10 Scope and purpose. ( a ) As part of the Performance Reporting System, each State agency is responsible for conducting quality control reviews. For SNAP quality control reviews, a sample of households shall be selected from two different categories: Households which are participating in SNAP (called active cases) and households for which participation was denied, suspended or terminated (called negative cases). Reviews shall be conducted on active cases to determine if households are eligible and receiving the correct allotment of SNAP benefits. The determination of whether the household received the correct allotment will be made by comparing the eligibility data gathered during the review against the amount authorized on the master issuance file. Reviews of negative cases shall be conducted to determine whether the State agency's decision to deny, suspend or terminate the household, as of the review date, was correct. Quality control reviews measure the validity of SNAP cases at a given time (the review date) by reviewing against SNAP standards established in the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 and the Regulations, taking into account any FNS authorized waivers to deviate from specific regulatory provisions. FNS and the State agency shall analyze findings of the reviews to determine the incidence and dollar amounts of errors, which will determine the State agency's liability for payment errors in accordance with the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008, as amended, and to plan corrective action to reduce excessive levels of errors for any State agency.
( b ) The objectives of quality control reviews are to provide: ( 1 ) A systematic method of measuring the validity of the SNAP caseload;
( 2 ) A basis for determining error rates;
( 3 ) A timely continuous flow of information on which to base corrective action at all levels of administration; and
( 4 ) A basis for establishing State agency liability for errors that exceed the National performance measure.
( c ) The review process is the activity necessary to complete reviews and document findings of all cases selected in the sample for quality control reviews. The review process shall consist of: ( 1 ) Case assignment and completion monitoring;
( 2 ) Case reviews;
( 3 ) Supervisory review of completed worksheets and schedules; and
( 4 ) Transmission of completed worksheets and schedules to the State agency for centralized data compilation and analysis.
[Amdt. 149, 44 FR 45893, Aug. 3, 1979, as amended by Amdt. 260, 49 FR 6304, Feb. 17, 1984; 54 FR 7016, Feb. 15, 1989; Amdt. 328, 56 FR 60051, Nov. 27, 1991; Amdt. 373, 64 FR 38294, July 16, 1999; 75 FR 33436, June 11, 2010]
#### § 3550.2 Purpose.

The purpose of the direct RHS single family housing loan programs is to provide low- and very low-income people who will live in rural areas with an opportunity to own adequate but modest, decent, safe, and sanitary dwellings and related facilities. The section 502 program offers persons who do not currently own adequate housing, and who cannot obtain other credit, the opportunity to acquire, build, rehabilitate, improve, or relocate dwellings in rural areas. The section 504 program offers loans to very low-income homeowners who cannot obtain other credit to repair or rehabilitate their properties. The section 504 program also offers grants to homeowners age 62 or older who cannot obtain a loan to correct health and safety hazards or to make the unit accessible to household members with disabilities.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2595 

To help ensure that all items offered for sale in any gift shop of the 

National Park Service or of the National Archives and Records Administration are produced in the United States, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 28, 2013 

Mr. ISRAEL (for himself and Ms. KAPTUR) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to 

the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be 

subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 

of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To help ensure that all items offered for sale in any gift 

shop of the National Park Service or of the National 

Archives and Records Administration are produced in 

the United States, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Parks Amer5 ican Products Act’’. 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2595 IH

1 SEC. 2. REQUIRING THAT ITEMS SOLD IN CERTAIN FED2 ERAL GIFT SHOPS ARE PRODUCED IN THE 

3 UNITED STATES. 

4 (a) NATIONAL PARK SERVICE.—The Secretary of the 

5 Interior shall ensure that all items offered for sale in any 

6 gift shop or visitor’s center located within a unit of the 

7 National Park System are produced in the United States. 

8 (b) NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINIS9 TRATION.—The Archivist of the United States shall en10 sure that all items offered for sale in any gift shop of the 

11 National Archives and Records Administration are pro12 duced in the United States. 

Æ 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Page 1 of 2 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENSACOLA DIVISION 

DOUGLAS REED, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. Case No.: 3:20cv5451/LAC/EMT 

MIRANDA W. SANTIAGO, et al., 

 Defendants. 

__________________________/ 

O R D E R

 The Chief Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation on June 18, 

2020 (ECF No. 9). Plaintiff was provided a copy of the Report and Recommendation 

and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States 

Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. 

 Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined it 

should be adopted. 

 Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 

 1. The Chief Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 

9) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 

 

Case 3:20-cv-05451-LC-EMT Document 12 Filed 07/14/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2 

Case No. 3:20cv5451/LAC/EMT

 2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 8) is DENIED. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 14th day of July, 2020. 

 

 LACEY A. COLLIER 

 SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

s/L.A. Collier 

Case 3:20-cv-05451-LC-EMT Document 12 Filed 07/14/20 Page 2 of 2
#### § 3419.8 Redistribution of funds.

Unmatched research and extension funds will be reapportioned in accordance with the research and extension statutory distribution formulas applicable to the 1890 and 1862 land-grant institutions in insular areas, respectively. Any redistribution of funds must be subject to the same matching requirement under § 3419.2.

[Redesignated and revised at 83 FR 21850, May 11, 2018]
RO 11502 

9444.1990(03) 

OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE 

APR 5 1990 

Mr. Chuck Kreider 

BASF Corporation 

8 Campus Drive 

Parsippany, New Jersey 07054 

Dear Mr. Kreider: 

This is in response to your letter of February 22, 1990 to 

Mr. Jace Cuje of Geo-Resource Consultants, Inc. (the 

RCRA/Superfund Hotline) concerning the commercial chemical 

product listing (40 CFR 261.33) for xylene (EPA Hazardous Waste 

No. U239). Specifically, you wanted to know if the listing for 

dimethyl benzene ( a chemical synonym for xylene) was listed for 

ignitability and toxicity, or ignitability only. 

On April 22, 1988, the Agency promulgated technical 

corrections to the 261.33 listings. (See 53 FR 13382.) In the 

process of doing this, the Agency added Chemical Abstracts 

Service (CAS) numbers to the listed chemicals, as well as 

chemical synonyms, to make understanding these regulations easier 

on the regulated community. After these corrections appeared in 

the Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations, we 

realized that a few typographical errors had been made. The case 

of dimethyl benzene is one of them. The listing for "benzene, 

dimethyl" (U239, CAS No. 1330-20-7) should be only for 

ignitability. We apologize for any inconvenience this may have 

caused you. 

Thank you for your inquiry. If you have any additional 

questions, please contact Ron Josephson of my staff at 

(202) 475-6715 or the RCRA/Superfund Hotline at (800) 424-9346. 

Sincerely, 

Original Document signed 

Robert M. Scarberry, Chief 

Land Disposal Restrictions Branch
#### § 3430.1000 Applicability of regulations.

The regulations in this subpart apply to the Federal assistance awards made under the program authorized under section 7526 of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 (FCEA), Pub. L. 110-246 (7 U.S.C. 8114).
EXHIBIT 32.2



October 30, 2009

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, NE

Washington, DC 20549



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Lazard Group LLC (the Registrant) hereby certifies that the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                                                     
|-----------------------------------------------------
|                                                     
|/s/    Michael J. Castellano                         
|Michael J. Castellano                                
|Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)



The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-41134

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANTONYA RENEE COLE,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-00-CR-96-3

--------------------

May 2, 2001

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Antonya Renee Cole appeals her convictions for possession of

marijuana with intent to distribute, conspiracy to possess

marijuana with intent to distribute, and conspiracy to commit

money laundering. She asserts that the evidence was insufficient

to support her conviction because the testimony of the

cooperating codefendant, Angela Doby, was induced through a plea

agreement and was not corroborated. The uncorroborated testimony

of a coconspirator may be sufficient to support a conviction. 

United States v. Westbrook, 119 F.3d 1176, 1189 (5th Cir. 1997). 
No. 00-41134

-2-

The offer of a leniency agreement by the Government does not

violate the federal bribery statute. See United States v. Haese,

162 F.3d 359, 367-68 (5th Cir. 1998). We hold that the evidence

was sufficient to support Cole’s conviction on each ground.

Cole has raised various assertions of ineffective assistance

of her trial counsel. The record has not been adequately

developed for this court to consider these claims on direct

appeal. See United States v. Higdon, 832 F.2d 312, 314 (5th Cir.

1987).

Cole also asserts that her trial was rendered fundamentally

unfair because a government witness improperly commented on

Cole’s post-arrest, post-Miranda silence in violation of Doyle v.

Ohio, 426 U.S. 610 (1976). Because no objection was made to the

witness’s testimony, review is for plain error. United States v.

Calverley, 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994)(en banc)(citing

United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 731-37 (1993)). As Cole

testified that she had exercised her right to remain silent in

order to bolster her own credibility and to refute another

officer’s testimony regarding her post-arrest statements, she

cannot show that her substantial rights were affected by the case

agent’s testimony. Consequently, her conviction is AFFIRMED.
Editorial Note on Part 3406
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3406 appear at 76 FR 4809, Jan. 27, 2011.

§ 3406.26 Monitoring progress of funded projects. ( a ) During the tenure of a grant, principal investigators/project directors must attend at least one national principal investigators/project directors meeting, if offered, in Washington, DC or any other announced location. The purpose of the meeting will be to discuss project and grant management, opportunities for collaborative efforts, future directions for education reform, research project management, advancing a field of science, and opportunities to enhance dissemination of exemplary end products/results.
( b ) An Annual Performance Report must be submitted to the USDA program contact person within 90 days after the completion of the first year of the project and annually thereafter during the life of the grant. Generally, the Annual Performance Reports should include a summary of the overall progress toward project objectives, current problems or unusual developments, the next year's planned activities, and any other information that is pertinent to the ongoing project or which may be specified in the terms and conditions of the award. These reports are in addition to the annual Current Research Information System (CRIS) reports required for all research grants under the award's “Special Terms and Conditions.”
( c ) A Final Performance Report must be submitted to the USDA program contact person within 90 days after the expiration date of the project. The expiration date is specified in the award documents and modifications thereto, if any. Generally, the Final Performance Report should be a summary of the completed project, including: A review of project objectives and accomplishments; a description of any products and outcomes resulting from the project; activities undertaken to disseminate products and outcomes; partnerships and collaborative ventures that resulted from the project; future initiatives that are planned as a result of the project; the impact of the project on the principal investigator(s)/project director(s), the institution, and the food and agricultural sciences higher education system; and data on project personnel and beneficiaries. The Final Performance Report should be accompanied by samples or copies of any products or publications resulting from or developed by the project. The Final Performance Report must also contain any other information which may be specified in the terms and conditions of the award.
#### § 3.85 Non-waiver of rights.

So long as there are no statutory or contractual provisions to the contrary, no employee payment (or all or portion of a debt) collected under these regulations will be interpreted as a waiver of any rights that the employee may have under 5 U.S.C. 5514.
§ 322.31 Notice of arrival. ( a ) At least 10 business days prior to the arrival in the United States of any shipment of restricted articles, you must notify APHIS of the impending arrival. Your notification must include the following information: ( 1 ) Your name, address, and telephone number;
( 2 ) The name and address of the recipient of the restricted articles;
( 3 ) The name, address, and telephone number of the producer;
( 4 ) The date you expect to receive the shipment;
( 5 ) A description of the contents of the shipment (*i.e.*, dead bees, honey for bee feed, etc.); and
( 6 ) The total number of restricted articles you expect to receive.
( b ) You must provide the notification to APHIS through one of the following means: ( 1 ) By mail to the Permit Unit, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 133, Riverdale, MD 20737-1236; or
( 2 ) By facsimile at (301) 734-8700; or
( 3 ) By electronic mail to *Notification@usda.gov , or*
( 4 ) Using a U.S. Government electronic information exchange system or other authorized method.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0207) [69 FR 61747, Oct. 21, 2004, as amended at 81 FR 40150, June 21, 2016]
EXHIBIT 10K

                        AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

      AMENDMENT  as of May 7, 2004 to the  AGREEMENT  ("Agreement")  dated as of
December 6, 2000 by and between AutoInfo,  Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Auto")
and Harry M. Wachtel, an individual residing at 10324 El Caballo Court, Del Rey,
Florida 33446 ("Wachtel")

      The following  modifications to the Agreement are hereby effective January
1, 2004:

      Pursuant to  paragraph 4 -  Compensation  - Salary  shall be  increased to
$205,000 per year.

      Pursuant  to  paragraph  5 - Bonus  - the  Bonus  shall  be  based  on the
Operating Profit up to $1,250,000.

      All other terms and provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force
and effect.

      IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the parties  hereto have caused this AMENDMENT to be
duly executed and delivered as of the day and year first above written.

                                       AUTOINFO, INC.


                                       By: /s/ William I. Wunderlich
                                          --------------------------
                                       William I. Wunderlich
                                       Title: Chief Financial Officer


                                       /s/ Harry Wachtel
                                       ------------------
                                       Harry M. Wachtel
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-07-14T20:13:47-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office