alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2223 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2223

  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain manufacturing 
               equipment used for working iron or steel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 30, 2006

  Mr. DeMint introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain manufacturing 
               equipment used for working iron or steel.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN MANUFACTURING EQUIPMENT USED FOR WORKING IRON OR 
              STEEL.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.84.83 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain manufacturing 
equipment) is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/
2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY – OREGON

The U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, 

Wildlife Services program (Wildlife Services) has issued a Decision and Finding of No 

Significant Impact (FONSI) for the Final Environmental Assessment (EA) entitled 

“Wildlife Services' Gray Wolf Damage Management In Oregon." A pre-decision EA was 

issued for public comment in July 2012. The proposed action in the EA is for Wildlife 

Services to assist the State of Oregon, Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) and 

Native American tribal governments with management of gray wolf conflicts throughout 

the state where wolves are not federally protected. The EA analyzes issues and potential 

environmental effects of the proposal and alternatives. Based on the analysis contained 

in the EA, Wildlife Services has decided to implement the proposed action as described 

in the EA, and has concluded that it will not have a significant impact on the quality of 

the human environment. The EA, including a summary of public comments, and the 

Decision and FONSI may be accessed at: 

http://www.aphis.usda.gov/wps/portal/aphis/ourfocus/wildlifedamage

The Final EA and Decision and FONSI may also be obtained by contacting: State 

Director, USDA APHIS Wildlife Services, 6135 NE 80th Ave., Ste. A-8, Portland, OR 

97218, Tel: (503) 326-2346.
Exhibit 21 SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT Alliance Bank, N.A. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Alliance Financial Corporation and is a national banking association organized
under the laws of the United States. Alliance Financial Capital
Trust I is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Alliance Financial Corporation and is
organized under the laws of the State of Delaware. Alliance Financial Capital
Trust II is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Alliance Financial Corporation and is
organized under the laws of the State of Delaware. Ladds Agency, Inc. is a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Alliance Financial Corporation and is organized
under the laws of the State of New York. Alliance Preferred Funding Corp. is a substantially
wholly-owned subsidiary of Alliance Bank, N.A. and is organized under the laws
of the State of Delaware. Alliance Leasing, Inc. is a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Alliance Bank, N.A. and is organized under the laws
of the State of New York.
#### § 3430.61 Debt collection.

The collection of debts owed to NIFA by awardees, including those resulting from cost disallowances, recovery of funds, unobligated balances, or other circumstances, are subject to the Department's debt collection procedures as set forth in 7 CFR part 3, and, with respect to cost disallowances, § 3430.59.
Editorial Note on Part 1940
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1940 appear at 80 FR 9876, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1940.963 Authority to transfer guaranteed loan amounts. ( a ) *Transfer of funds.* If the amounts allocated to a designated State for guaranteed Water and Waste Disposal, Community Facility, or Business and Industry loans for a FY are not sufficient to provide the full amount requested for a project in accordance with this subpart, the State Director may transfer part or all of the funds allocated to the State, from one program to another, subject to paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
( b ) *Limitation on amounts transferred.* The amount of guaranteed loan funds transferred from a program under this section shall not exceed the amount left unobligated after obligating the full amount of assistance requested for each project that ranked higher in priority on the panel's list.
( c ) *National Office concurrence.* The State Director may transfer guaranteed loan funds authorized in this section, after requesting and receiving concurrence from the National Office. If permitted by law, the National Office will concur in requests on a first-come-first-served basis.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NOS. 4:00cr46-RH/WCS

4:05cv445-RH/WCS

LEONARD CHARLES BROWN,

Defendant.

________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This matter is before the court on the report and recommendation (document

115), and the objections thereto (document 116). I have reviewed de novo the

issues raised by the objections. Upon consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the opinion

of the court. Defendant's motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b)

(document 114) is DISMISSED. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and

close the file.

SO ORDERED this 7th day of February, 2006.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:00-cr-00046-RH-CAS Document 117 Filed 02/07/06 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1

Case No. 4:20cv117-RH-MAF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

FREDDY WILSON,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:20cv117-RH-MAF

CONSUMER FINANCIAL 

PROTECTION BUREAU, 

and ALLY FINANCIAL,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and 

recommendation, ECF No. 8. No objections have been filed. Upon consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as the court’s 

opinion. The clerk must enter judgment stating, “This case is dismissed without 

prejudice.” The clerk must close the file.

SO ORDERED on June 2, 2020.

s/Robert L. Hinkle

United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00117-RH-MAF Document 9 Filed 06/02/20 Page 1 of 1
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2211 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on Fluorobenzene. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 30, 2006 

Mr. DEMINT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on 

Fluorobenzene. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FLUOROBENZENE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.03.05 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 Fluorobenzene) is amended in the effective period column 

7 by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ and inserting ‘‘12/31/2008’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•S 2211 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
Page 1 of 3

Cases No. 4:03cr19-RH/GRJ and 4:16cv469-RH/GRJ

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASES NO. 4:03cr19-RH/GRJ

 4:16cv469-RH/GRJ

JEREMY GRAHAM,

Defendant.

________________________________/

ORDER DENYING THE § 2255 MOTION AND

DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

The defendant has moved under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 for relief from his 

judgment of conviction. The motion is before the court on the magistrate judge’s 

report and recommendation, ECF No. 148. No objections have been filed. This 

order accepts the report and recommendation, adopts it as the court’s opinion, and 

denies the § 2255 motion.

A defendant may appeal the denial of a § 2255 motion only if the district 

court or court of appeals issues a certificate of appealability. Under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(2), a certificate of appealability may issue “only if the applicant has 

made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” Miller-El v. 

Case 4:03-cr-00019-RH-GRJ Document 149 Filed 10/07/16 Page 1 of 3
Page 2 of 3

Cases No. 4:03cr19-RH/GRJ and 4:16cv469-RH/GRJ

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 335-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 483-84 

(2000); Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880, 893 n.4 (1983); see also Williams v. 

Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 402-13 (2000) (setting out the standards applicable to a 

§ 2254 petition on the merits). As the Court said in Slack:

To obtain a COA under § 2253(c), a habeas prisoner must 

make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right, a demonstration that, under Barefoot, includes 

showing that reasonable jurists could debate whether (or, for 

that matter, agree that) the petition should have been 

resolved in a different manner or that the issues presented 

were “adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed 

further.” 

529 U.S. at 483-84 (quoting Barefoot, 463 U.S. at 893 n.4). Further, in order to 

obtain a certificate of appealability when dismissal is based on procedural grounds, 

a petitioner must show, “at least, that jurists of reason would find it debatable 

whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and 

that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct 

in its procedural ruling.” Id. at 484. 

The defendant has not made the required showing. This order thus denies a 

certificate of appealability. 

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The clerk must enter a judgment stating, “The defendant’s motion for 

relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is denied for lack of jurisdiction.”

Case 4:03-cr-00019-RH-GRJ Document 149 Filed 10/07/16 Page 2 of 3
Page 3 of 3

Cases No. 4:03cr19-RH/GRJ and 4:16cv469-RH/GRJ

2. A certificate of appealability is denied.

SO ORDERED on October 7, 2016.

s/Robert L. Hinkle

United States District Judge

Case 4:03-cr-00019-RH-GRJ Document 149 Filed 10/07/16 Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 224 (Monday, November 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 71130]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29269]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than December 6, 2010.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. The James Blin Family (James Lee Blin and Randy Alan Blin, both 
of Independence, Iowa; Timothy Lee Blin, Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida; 
Sandra Blin Burgard, Bozeman, Montana; and Tamara Blin Diamond, Mesa, 
Arizona); to retain control of voting shares of Independence 
Bancshares, Inc., Independence, Iowa, and thereby indirectly retain 
control of voting shares of Security State Bank, Independence, Iowa and 
Northeast Security Bank, Sumner, Iowa.


    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 16, 
2010.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-29269 Filed 11-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
EXHIBIT 1

ESTIMATED ANNUAL RESPONDENT BURDEN AND COST

Hours and Costs Per Respondent Per Activity Total Hours and Costs

Leg. Mgr. Tech. Cler. Respon. Labor Capital/ Number Total

$108.80 $98.01 $93.82 $46.51 Hours Cost Startup O & M of Total Cost/

INFORMATION COLLECTION ACTIVITY / Hour / Hour / Hour / Hour Cost Cost Respond. Hours/Year Year

Annual GHG Inventory Summary and Goal Tracking Form

Subsequent Year Inventory

Identify and record any changes made to baseline data or inventory methodologies 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 $188 $0 $0 46 92.0 $8,648

Update inventory data 0.00 0.00 15.00 0.00 15.00 $1,407 $0 $0 46 690.0 $64,722

Complete Spreadsheet Form, submit to EPA, and file copy 0.00 1.00 3.00 0.00 4.00 $379 $0 $0 46 184.0 $17,434

SUBTOTAL 0.00 1.00 20.00 0.00 21.00 1974.00 0.00 0.00 138.00 966.00 $90,804

TOTAL 0.00 1.00 20.00 0.00 21.00 $1,974 0.00 0.00 138.00 966.00 $90,804

* Labor rates listed here are the rates provided by partner consultations

** Unique respondents, some partners may submit more than one type of response

Page 17
EXHIBIT 2

ESTIMATED ANNUAL AGENCY BURDEN AND COST

Hours and Costs Per Respondent Per Activity Total Hours and Costs

Contractor Agency Agency Agency Agency Contractor &

Tech. Leg. Mgr. Tech. Cler. Agency Labor Capital/ Number Total

$147.00 $86.86 $86.86 $46.36 $21.10 Hours Cost Startup O & M of Total Cost/

INFORMATION COLLECTION ACTIVITY / Hour / Hour / Hour / Hour / Hour Cost Cost Respond. Hours/Year Year

Annual GHG Inventory Summary and Goal Tracking Form

Subsequent Year Inventory

Receive, review, and enter information into database 13.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 15.0 $2,004 $0 $0 46 690.0 $92,184

SUBTOTAL 13.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 15.0 $2,004 0.0 0.0 46.0 690.0 $92,184

TOTAL 13.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 15.00 $2,004 0.00 0.00 46.00 690.00 $92,184

* Labor rates for EPA personnel were used for all public-sector personnel, including employees of State/Local/Tribal agencies. Source for EPA labor rates: Office of Personnel Management: 2011 GS Salary Table of Annual Rates by 

Grade and Step http://opm.gov/oca/11tables/html/gs.asp. Legal and managerial rates assumed a GS level 15 step 5; technical rates assumed a GS level 12 step 1; clerical rates assumed a GS level 5 step 1. A loaded hourly wage to 

account for benefits and overhead was calculated from the annual rates given in the table according to the instructions in the ICR Handbook, p A-31. GS Hourly wage = [GS annual salary($)/2080 (hours/year)]*1.6

Page 27
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2541 

To allow certain off-duty law enforcement officers and retired law enforcement 

officers to carry a concealed firearm to protect children in a school zone. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 27, 2013 

Mrs. HARTZLER (for herself, Mr. BROUN of Georgia, Mr. CHABOT, Mr. COLE, 

Mr. LUETKEMEYER, Mr. MULVANEY, Mrs. NOEM, Mr. KING of Iowa, 

Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. DESJARLAIS, Mr. FINCHER, Mr. ROE of Tennessee, Mr. LONG, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. CARTER, Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio, 

Mr. RADEL, Mr. PALAZZO, Mr. SCHWEIKERT, Mr. BENISHEK, Mr. 

DESANTIS, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr. MEADOWS, and Mr. SMITH of 

Missouri) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To allow certain off-duty law enforcement officers and retired 

law enforcement officers to carry a concealed firearm 

to protect children in a school zone. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Police Officers Pro5 tecting Children Act’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2541 IH

1 SEC. 2. CERTAIN OFF-DUTY LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS 

2 AND RETIRED LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS 

3 ALLOWED TO CARRY A CONCEALED FIRE4 ARM, AND DISCHARGE A FIREARM, IN A 

5 SCHOOL ZONE. 

6 Section 922(q) of title 18, United States Code, is 

7 amended— 

8 (1) in paragraph (2)(B)— 

9 (A) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of clause 

10 (vi); and 

11 (B) by redesignating clause (vii) as clause 

12 (ix) and inserting after clause (vi) the following: 

13 ‘‘(vii) by an off-duty law enforcement offi14 cer who is a qualified law enforcement officer 

15 (as defined in section 926B) and is authorized 

16 under such section to carry a concealed firearm, 

17 if the firearm is concealed; 

18 ‘‘(viii) by a qualified retired law enforce19 ment officer (as defined in section 926C) who 

20 is authorized under such section to carry a con21 cealed firearm, if the firearm is concealed; or’’; 

22 and 

23 (2) in paragraph (3)(B)— 

24 (A) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of clause 

25 (iii); 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2541 IH

1 (B) by striking the period at the end of 

2 clause (iv) and inserting a semicolon; and 

3 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(v) by an off-duty law enforcement officer 

5 who is a qualified law enforcement officer (as 

6 defined in section 926B) and is authorized 

7 under such section to carry a concealed firearm; 

8 or 

9 ‘‘(vi) by a qualified retired law enforcement 

10 officer (as defined in section 926C) who is au11 thorized under such section to carry a concealed 

12 firearm.’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Charles Sorkin, an Attorney.

Determination of petition of the Departmental Disciplinary Committee held in abeyance, a reference ordered and pending receipt of Referee’s report, respondent is suspended from practice as an attorney and counselor at law effective as of the date of this court’s order, all as indicated therein. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Ross, Lupiano and Carro, JJ.
#### § 3555.207 Special requirements for Planned Unit Developments (PUDs).

Loans may be guaranteed for PUDs that meet all of the requirements of this part, as well as the criteria for PUDs established by HUD, VA, Fannie Mae, or Freddie Mac.
H. R. 258 

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and thirteen 

An Act 

To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to fraudulent representations 

about having received military decorations or medals. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stolen Valor Act of 2013’’. 

SEC. 2. FRAUDULENT REPRESENTATIONS ABOUT RECEIPT OF MILITARY DECORATIONS OR MEDALS. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 704 of title 18, United States Code, 

is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘wears,’’; and 

(2) so that subsection (b) reads as follows: 

‘‘(b) FRAUDULENT REPRESENTATIONS ABOUT RECEIPT OF MILITARY DECORATIONS OR MEDALS.—Whoever, with intent to obtain 

money, property, or other tangible benefit, fraudulently holds oneself out to be a recipient of a decoration or medal described in 

subsection (c)(2) or (d) shall be fined under this title, imprisoned 

not more than one year, or both.’’. 

(b) ADDITION OF CERTAIN OTHER MEDALS.—Section 704(d) of 

title 18, United States Code, is amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘If a decoration’’ and inserting the following: 

‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—If a decoration’’; 

(2) by inserting ‘‘a combat badge,’’ after ‘‘1129 of title 10,’’; 

and 

(3) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(2) COMBAT BADGE DEFINED.—In this subsection, the term 

‘combat badge’ means a Combat Infantryman’s Badge, Combat 

Action Badge, Combat Medical Badge, Combat Action Ribbon, 

or Combat Action Medal.’’. 

(c) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 704 of title 18, United 

States Code, is amended in each of subsections (c)(1) and (d) by 

striking ‘‘or (b)’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
§ 31.400 Samples for wool and wool top grades; method of obtaining. Samples certified as representative of the official standards of the United States for grades of wool and wool top will be furnished as follows, subject to other conditions of this section, upon filing of an approved application and prepayment of costs thereof as fixed in §§ 31.401 and 31.402. The certification will be issued by the United States Department of Agriculture and will be signed by the Director of the Livestock Division or other duly authorized official. ( a ) Samples representative of each of the standard grades of wool: ( 1 ) *Complete set:* Grades 80's through 36's. Fourteen samples, each of approximately 1 ⁄ 8 pound grease wool, or
( 2 ) *Individual sample:* Individual samples of approximately 1 ⁄ 8 pound of grease wool.
( b ) Samples representative of each of the standard grades of wool top: ( 1 ) *Complete set:* Grades 80's through 36's. Fourteen samples, each of approximately 3 ounces wool top, or
( 2 ) *Individual sample:* Individual samples of approximately 3 ounces of wool top, representing a standard grade.
( c ) Each application for standard samples of wool or wool top shall be upon an application form furnished or approved by the Agricultural Marketing Service, shall be signed by the applicant, and shall be accompanied by certified check, draft, post office money order, or express money order, payable to the “Agricultural Marketing Service,” in an amount to cover the cost of the samples requested, and shall incorporate the following agreement: ( 1 ) That no samples representative of the official wool or wool top standards shall be considered or used as representing such standards after cancellation in accordance with this section.
( 2 ) That the said standard samples shall be subject to inspection by the Secretary or by any duly authorized officer or agent of the Department of Agriculture during usual business hours of the person having custody of the samples.
( 3 ) That the certificate covering any of the samples representative of the standards may be revoked and canceled by the Director of the Livestock Division if it is found upon such inspection that the said samples are not representative of the official standards.
Note to § 31.400 :
A sample consists of wool randomly selected from a bulk sample. The measured average and standard deviation of fiber diameter of the bulk sample are within the limits corresponding to the grade of the standard sample as set forth in the voluntary U.S. grade standards. Copies of the voluntary U.S. grade standards can be obtained from Director, Livestock and Seed Division, Agricultural Marketing Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, P.O. Box 96456, Washington, DC 20090-6456.