alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Articolor Graphic Co., Ltd., Appellant, v. After Hours Books, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Stanley Malkin, Respondent.

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated May 17,1968, which granted defendant Malkin’s motion to dismiss the complaint as to him. Order reversed, on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied. Said defendant is herewith granted leave to answer the complaint within 10 days after entry of the order hereon. In this action against an individual and eight corporations to recover a balance due for goods sold and delivered, and upon an account stated therefor, the individual defendant, Malkin, moved before answer, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd. [a]), to dismiss the complaint as against him for, *inter alia,*failure to state a cause of action. The complaint alleged, in part, that Malkin had represented that he owned and controlled the defendant corporations, that all orders were being made personally by him, and that he would personally pay therefor no matter which defendant corporation would be nominally billed for particular orders at his direction. Upon the verified complaint, answer by the corporate defendants, and numerous affidavits and exhibits submitted by each side, and after hearing counsel for the respective parties, the Special Term held, in part, that it had been conclusively shown that Malkin had been merely acting as an agent for the corporate defendants and that, since it was neither claimed nor shown that he had guaranteed payment by his principals, the complaint as to him should be dismissed for insufficiency. In so doing, the Special Term chose to exercise its power under the statute (CPLR 3211, subd. [e]) to treat the motion as a motion for summary judgment, for its determination was not directed to the sufficiency of the complaint *as a pleading,*on the assumption that all its allegations are true, but was made upon all of the proof adduced. However, in our opinion, the learned Special Term erred, for we find in the conflicting affidavits issues of fact, including the question whether Malkin acted as principal or as agent, resolution of which should be left to a trial *(Falk*v. *Goodman,*7 N Y 2d 87, 91; *Exchange Leasing Corp.*v. *Bundy,*29 A D 2d 828; *H & M Heating Utilities*v. *Teplitz,*24 *549A D 2d 468, app. dsmd. 16 N Y 2d 1043; *Crowley’s Milk Co.*v. *Klein,*24 A D 2d 920; *Di Donna*v. *Sachs,*9 A D 2d 576). Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Benjamin and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
#### § 3430.36 Procedures to minimize or eliminate duplication of effort.

NIFA may implement appropriate business processes to minimize or eliminate the awarding of NIFA Federal assistance that unnecessarily duplicates activities already being sponsored under other awards, including awards made by other Federal agencies. Business processes may include the review of the Current and Pending Support Form; documented CRIS searches prior to award; the conduct of PD workshops, conferences, meetings, and symposia; and agency participation in Federal Government-wide and other committees, taskforces, or groups that seek to solve problems related to agricultural research, education, and extension and other activities delegated to the NIFA Director.
Unassociated Document


    Termination
Agreement

     

    This
Termination Agreement by
and between Federal-Mogul Corporation, a Delaware company (the “Company”) and Jeff
Kaminski (“Executive”) is
entered into as of April 15, 2009.

     

    WHEREAS, the Executive and the
Company entered in to an Amended and Restated Change in Control Employment
Agreement dated as of December 15, 2008 (the “CIC Agreement”);
and

     

    WHEREAS, the Executive and the
Company have mutually agreed to terminate the CIC Agreement as of April 15, 2009
(the “Termination
Date”).

     

    NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, it is hereby agreed as follows:

     

    
      	
              1.

            	
              The
      Company and Executive agree to terminate the CIC Agreement as of the
      Termination Date.

            


    

     

    
      	
              2.

            	
              As
      of the Termination Date, the CIC Agreement shall be terminated and shall
      be deemed to have no further force and effect as of the Termination Date,
      and neither the Company nor Executive shall have any rights, obligations
      or duties under the CIC Agreement as of the Termination
    Date.

            


    

     

    
      	
              3.

            	
              The
      Severance Agreement dated as of December 15, 2008 by and between the
      Company and Executive shall continue in full force and effect in
      accordance with its terms and conditions and shall not be affected by the
      execution and delivery of this Termination
  Agreement.

            


    

     

    IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and Executive have executed this Termination
Agreement as of the date first above written.

     

    
      
        
          
            	
                    FEDERAL-MOGUL
      CORPORATION

                  
	 
      
	 
      
	
                          
                      /s/
      Robert L. Katz

                    

                  
	
                    Robert
      L. Katz

                  
	
                    Senior
      Vice President

                  
	 
      
	 
      
	
                          
                      /s/
      Jeff Kaminski

                    

                  
	
                    Executive
#### CAULFIELD, Appellant, v. CAULFIELD et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 8, 1906.)

Action by George M. Caulfield against Robert A. Caulfield and others.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs,
EXHIBIT 32 

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to 

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 

as Adopted Pursuant to 

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BlackRock Capital Investment Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2020 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), James E. Keenan, as Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael Pungello, as Interim Chief Financial Officer and Interim Treasurer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of operations of the Company. 

 

|                              |                                                       |
|------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                         |                                                  |
| /s/ James E. Keenan

   |
| Name:                        | James E. Keenan                                       |
| Title:                       | Interim Chief Executive Officer                       |
| Date:                        | July 29, 2020                                         |
|                         |
| /s/ Michael Pungello

  |
| Name:                        | Michael Pungello                                      |
| Title:                       | Interim Chief Financial Officer and Interim Treasurer |
| Date:                        | July 29, 2020                                         |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

ex rel. RAYME M. EDLER, M.D., 

 

VS CASE NO. 3:20-cv-5503-RV-HTC 

 

ESCAMBIA COUNTY, 

REFERRAL AND ORDER

 

Referred to Judge Vinson on 8/26/2021 

Type of Motion/Pleading Defendant’s Third Unopposed Motion for 

Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint

Filed by: Defendant on 8/26/2021 Doc. No. 27 

X Stipulated/Consented/Joint Pleading/Unopposed 

Response: on Doc. No. 

 

 

JESSICA J. LYUBLANOVITS 

CLERK OF COURT 

/s/ Jeremy Wright 

 Deputy Clerk 

 

ORDER

 

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 26th day of August, 2021, 

that: 

(a) The requested relief is GRANTED, through September 13, 2021. 

(b) 

 

 

 /s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON 

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-05503-RV-HTC Document 28 Filed 08/26/21 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1



November 3, 2008

Securities and Exchange
Commission

100 F Street, NE

Washington, DC 20549



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Lazard Group
LLC (the Registrant) hereby certifies that the Registrants quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|                                                      
|/s/    Bruce Wasserstein                              
|Bruce Wasserstein Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:92cr4013-WS

EGNATIUS JOHNSON,

Defendant.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc.

1709) docketed June 28, 2006. The magistrate judge recommends that the defendant's

"Request for Relief from the Judgment" be summarily denied. The defendant has filed

no objections to the report and recommendation.

Upon review of the record, this court has determined that the report and

recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 1709) is hereby

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order.

2. The defendant’s "Request for Relief from the Judgment" (doc. 1689) is hereby

summarily DENIED.

Case 4:92-cr-04013-WS-CAS Document 1716 Filed 08/03/06 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 4:92cv4013-WS

3. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and shall close Case No.

4:06cv31-WS.

DONE AND ORDERED this 3rd day of August , 2006.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:92-cr-04013-WS-CAS Document 1716 Filed 08/03/06 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than December 8, 2010.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (Michael E. Collins, Senior Vice President) 100 North 6th Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19105-1521:

1. Warburg Pincus Private Equity X, L.P.; Warburg Pincus X Partners, L.P.; Warburg Pincus X L.P.; Warburg Pincus & Co.; Warburg Pincus Partners, LLC Warburg Pincus X, LLC and Warburg Pincus LLC, all of New York, New York; to acquire voting shares of National Penn Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of National Penn Bank, both of Boyertown, Pennsylvania, and The Christiana Bank and Trust Company, Greenville, Delaware.

B. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Glenda Wilson, Community Affairs Officer) P.O. Box 442, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:

1. The House Family Control Group (which consists of Verlene H. House Revocable Trust, Verlene H. House as trustee; White River Bituminous, Inc.; Edward House; Howard House; Dianne Lamberth; Marcus Lamberth; Lauren Lamberth Patterson, all of Batesville, Arkansas; and Lance Lamberth, San Francisco, California), Batesville, Arkansas, to acquire voting shares of First Community Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of First Community Bank of Batesville, both of Batesville, Arkansas.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 18, 2010.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-29490 Filed 11-22-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
76


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CNE Group,  Inc. (the  "Registrant")  on
Form 10-KSB for the annual  period  ending  December 31,  20034as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, George
W.  Benoit,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss.906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

                                                  /s/ George W. Benoit
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  George W. Benoit
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
                                                  April 15, 2005
#### William H. Dickens, Appellant, v. Town of Livonia, Respondent.

Judgment insofar as appealed from uanimously modified by striking the first *984ordering paragraph (see *Matter of Mandis*v. *Gorski,*24 A D 2d 181, 184), and as modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. (Appeal from part of judgment of Livingston Trial Term in a declaratory judgment action.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Henry, Del Veechio and Marsh, JJ.
Case 3:98-cv-00434-RV-SMN Document 221 Filed 04/03/00 Page 1 of 8
Case 3:98-cv-00434-RV-SMN Document 221 Filed 04/03/00 Page 2 of 8
Case 3:98-cv-00434-RV-SMN Document 221 Filed 04/03/00 Page 3 of 8
Case 3:98-cv-00434-RV-SMN Document 221 Filed 04/03/00 Page 4 of 8
Case 3:98-cv-00434-RV-SMN Document 221 Filed 04/03/00 Page 5 of 8
Case 3:98-cv-00434-RV-SMN Document 221 Filed 04/03/00 Page 6 of 8
Case 3:98-cv-00434-RV-SMN Document 221 Filed 04/03/00 Page 7 of 8
Case 3:98-cv-00434-RV-SMN Document 221 Filed 04/03/00 Page 8 of 8
Second Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement
of Smith Barney Bristol Energy Fund L.P.
 th th
 W I T N E S S E T H




---



##### 



Formation and Name.
  Principal Office.
 th th
 Business.
       2




---



##### 



Term, Dissolution and Fiscal Year.
 Term.
 Dissolution.
 Fiscal Year.
 Net Worth of General Partner.
  Capital Contributions and Units of Partnership Interest.
   3




---



##### 



Allocation of Profits and Losses.
 Capital Accounts.
 Allocations.
    4




---



##### 



Allocations for Tax Purposes.
 Definitions.
 Net Assets.
 Net Asset Value per Unit.
 Expenses and Limitation Thereof.
 5




---



##### 



Limited Liability of Limited Partners.
   Return of Limited Partners Capital Contribution.
 Profit Share Allocation to the Special Limited Partner.
    6




---



##### 



Management of the Partnership.
     7




---



##### 



Audits and Reports to Limited Partners.
  8




---



##### 



Transfer and Redemption of Units.
 Initial Limited Partner.
 Transfer.
 9




---



##### 



Redemption.
   10




---



##### 



Private Placement of Units of Limited Partnership Interest.
  Admission of Additional Partners.
  Special Power of Attorney.
  11




---



##### 



Withdrawal of a Partner.
  No Personal Liability for Return of Capital.
  Indemnification.
    12




---



##### 



Amendments; Meetings.
 Amendments with Consent of the General Partner.
   13




---



##### 



Meetings.
 Amendments and Actions without Consent of the General Partner.
 Continuation.
 Governing Law.
  Miscellaneous.
 Priority among Limited Partners.
 Notices.
 14




---



##### 



Binding Effect.
 Captions.
    By:
    /s/ Jerry PascucciJerry PascucciPresident and Director   By:
    /s/ Andrew M. RoweAndrew M. RowePresident 
 By:
    /s/ Andrew M. RoweAndrew M. RowePresident 15




---



##### 



By: CITIGROUP MANAGED FUTURES LLC
ATTORNEY-IN-FACTBy:
    /s/ Jerry PascucciJerry PascucciPresident and Director 16
#### § 28.182 Denial of service.

The Deputy Administrator may for good cause, including the acts or practices set forth in § 28.32(a) or any knowing violation of the regulations in this subpart, deny any person, including the agents, officers, subsidiaries, or affiliates of such person, from any or all benefits of this subpart for a specified period, after notice and opportunity for hearing has been afforded. Procedures outlined, or referred, in part 50 of this chapter (7 CFR 50.1 through 50.12) shall govern proceedings under this section.

[81 FR 7031, Feb. 10, 2016]
*Tuesday, October 27, 1998*

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET

98-2266.

#### In re Judicial Campaign Complaint Against Burick.

In re Judicial Campaign Complaint No. 98-2266 Against Elizabeth Burick

ORDER

Pursuant to Rule II, Section 5(E)(1) of the Supreme Court Rules for the Government of the Judiciary of Ohio and section 2701.11 of the Ohio Revised Code, the Supreme Court appoints the following judges to serve on the five-judge commission to consider the report of the hearing panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline in *In re Judicial Campaign Complaint Against Elizabeth Burick,*Case No. 98-2266:

> Judge Charles E. Henry Geauga County Court of Common Pleas (Eleventh District)

> Judge Peggy Bryant Tenth District Court of Appeals

> Judge Ann Marie Tracey Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas (First District)

> Judge Richard K. Warren Allen County Court of Common Pleas (Third District)

> Judge Frederick C. Hany II Ottawa County Municipal Court (Sixth District)

Pursuant to Gov. Jud. R. Ill, Section 2(B)(1), the Supreme Court designates Judge Henry as chairman of the Commission.

Pursuant to R.C. 2701.11, Richard A. Dove, Associate Director of the Supreme Court of Ohio, for the purpose of this proceeding, is designated as Administrative Director to serve as Secretary to the Commission, with authority to sign entries and orders on behalf of and at the direction of the Commission or its chairman.

All pleadings and documents in this matter shall be filed with the Clerk of the Supreme Court, The original and seven copies of all documents shall be filed. Service on the Commission shall be made by serving the Secretary. The Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio shall apply to all proceedings before the Commission, except as otherwise ordered by the Court.

THOMAS J. MOYER

Chief Justice Dated: October 27,1998
#### Victor Liotta, Appellant, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Albert McQueen, Respondent.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff Victor Liotta appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered April 2, 1968 after a nonjury trial, as limited his recovery to $1,250 plus costs and disbursements. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs. In our opinion, the trier of the. facts was warranted in not adopting the opinion of appellant’s medical expert as controlling in the case. Considering all the proof elicited upon the trial, the court (sitting without a jury) was free to reject the testimony of appellant’s physician both as to the extent of appellant’s 1963 injury and the causal relationship between that injury and the March, 1965, accident as unsupported by a preponderance of the credible evidence. Although respondent offered no medical evidence to contradict appellant’s claims, the facts of the case raise great doubt as to the truthfulness and accuracy of appellant's own proof. Nor can we say, as a matter of law, that the verdict is inadequate. Brennan, Rabin, Benjamin and Martuscello, JJ., concur; Christ, Acting P. J., not voting.