Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #1 9/3/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD J 0.028520539

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #2 9/4/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD J 0.008737967

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #3 9/4/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD J 0.012525319

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #1 9/3/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF J 0.018083398

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #2 9/4/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF JK 0.001747593

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #3 9/4/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF JK 0.010128128

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #1 9/3/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD JK 0.012386937

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #2 9/4/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD J 0.004916958

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #3 9/4/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD J 0.00743129

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #1 9/3/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF J 0.010781223

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly ICR Phase II - ARPotlatchForestWar ng/dscm @ Dutch Oven/Pile 

E, N

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #2 9/4/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF J 0.001960859

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #3 9/4/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF J 0.014892544

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #1 9/3/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD J 0.00535238

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #2 9/4/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD JK 0.000826404

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #3 9/4/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND (U) 0.001294483

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #1 9/3/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF J 0.008449114

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #2 9/4/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF J 0.001495821

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #3 9/4/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.032062419

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #1 9/3/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF J 0.008602039

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #2 9/4/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND (U) 0.000663493

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #3 9/4/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF J 0.008869604

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #1 9/3/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD J 0.007111019

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #2 9/4/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD JK 0.001999365

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #3 9/4/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND (U) 0.001405353

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Page 1 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #1 9/3/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF J 0.007225713

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #2 9/4/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF JK 0.001033746

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #3 9/4/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.015252122

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #1 9/3/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD J 0.00535238

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #2 9/4/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD J 0.00150767

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #3 9/4/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND (U) 0.001015809

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #1 9/3/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF J 0.007340407

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #2 9/4/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF J 0.001436581

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #3 9/4/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF J 0.005573467

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #1 9/3/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD J 0.008143264

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly ICR Phase II - ARPotlatchForestWar ng/dscm @ Dutch Oven/Pile 

E, N

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #2 9/4/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD JK 0.001697239

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #3 9/4/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND (U) 0.001276504

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #1 9/3/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF J 0.00565823

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #2 9/4/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND (U) 0.000399873

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #3 9/4/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND (U) 0.000851003

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #1 9/3/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF J 0.007837414

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #2 9/4/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF J 0.001220353

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #3 9/4/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF J 0.004464767

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #1 9/3/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF J 0.009060815

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #2 9/4/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF J 0.00265101

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #3 9/4/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF JK 0.006772062

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #1 9/3/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD J 0.001972734

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #2 9/4/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD JK 0.00127367

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #3 9/4/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND (U) 0.000731143

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Page 2 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #1 9/3/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF C 0.002167714

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #2 9/4/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF C 0.001972707

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test 

report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly 

shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates Dioxins/Furans

ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #3 9/4/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF C 0.004824345

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #1 7/17/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD B 0.038638087

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #2 7/17/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD BJ 0.017067679

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #3 7/20/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD B 0.038955124

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #1 7/17/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF BJ 0.005902196

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #2 7/17/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF ND (U) 0.00156

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #3 7/20/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF BJ 0.004843069

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

E, N

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #1 7/17/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD BJ 0.015150998

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #2 7/17/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ND (U) 0.00132

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #3 7/20/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD B 0.029865595

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #1 7/17/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BJ 0.004624401

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #2 7/17/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF ND (U) 0.000996

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #3 7/20/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BJ 0.005053638

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #1 7/17/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD J 0.001712854

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #2 7/17/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND (U) 0.00116

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #3 7/20/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD J 0.010423128

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #1 7/17/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BJ 0.004654825

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #2 7/17/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF ND (U) 0.000719

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Page 3 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #3 7/20/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BJK 0.00698

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #1 7/17/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND (U) 0.000791

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #2 7/17/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND (U) 0.00129

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #3 7/20/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND (U) 0.00129

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #1 7/17/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD J 0.003650843

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #2 7/17/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND (U) 0.00123

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #3 7/20/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD J 0.011967295

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #1 7/17/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF JK 0.00255

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

E, N

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #2 7/17/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ND (U) 0.000685

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #3 7/20/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF J 0.005931005

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #1 7/17/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD JK 0.00196

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #2 7/17/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND (U) 0.00137

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #3 7/20/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD J 0.01372203

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #1 7/17/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF J 0.003894232

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #2 7/17/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF JK 0.002278493

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #3 7/20/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF J 0.017126217

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #1 7/17/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD JK 0.0042

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #2 7/17/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND (U) 0.00113

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #3 7/20/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD J 0.014599398

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Page 4 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #1 7/17/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND (U) 0.00035

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #2 7/17/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND (U) 0.000908

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #3 7/20/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF JK 0.00157

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #1 7/17/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF JK 0.00307

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #2 7/17/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND (U) 0.000778

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #3 7/20/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF J 0.009475571

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #1 7/17/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF JK 0.00517

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #2 7/17/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF ND (U) 0.0009

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

E, N

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #3 7/20/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.018705478

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #1 7/17/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD 0.012534561

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #2 7/17/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND (U) 0.00126

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #3 7/20/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD 0.007054036

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #1 7/17/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF C 0.018254214

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #2 7/17/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF ND (U) 0.00146

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, N

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that 

detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

ARWeyerhaeuserDier

ksMill SN-45 Sample #3 7/20/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF C 0.064223312

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 0.0024

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #2 8/20/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 0.002

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #3 8/20/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 0.0016

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF 0.0006

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #2 8/20/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF 0.0007

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #3 8/20/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF 0.0006

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ND 0.0007

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

Page 5 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #2 8/20/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.0007

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #3 8/20/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ND 0.0006

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF ND 0.0007

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #2 8/20/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF ND 0.0006

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #3 8/20/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF ND 0.0004

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.0002

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #2 8/20/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.0002

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #3 8/20/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.0002

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.0006

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #2 8/20/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.0004

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #3 8/20/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.0004

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.0003

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #2 8/20/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.0003

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #3 8/20/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.0003

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non- ICR Phase II - ng/dscm @ 

N detect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD 0.0003

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #2 8/20/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD 0.0002

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #3 8/20/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.0002

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.0004

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #2 8/20/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.0003

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #3 8/20/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.0004

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.0002

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #2 8/20/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD 0.0003

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #3 8/20/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.0002

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF 0.0003

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #2 8/20/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF 0.0004

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #3 8/20/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.0002

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.0002

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #2 8/20/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD 0.0003

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #3 8/20/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.0002

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF 0.0003

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #2 8/20/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.0003

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #3 8/20/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.0003

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

Page 6 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #1 8/19/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.0004

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #2 8/20/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.0003

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #3 8/20/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.0003

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #1 8/19/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.0006

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #2 8/20/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.0005

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #3 8/20/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.0007

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #1 8/19/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.0004

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #2 8/20/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.0003

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #3 8/20/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.0003

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #1 8/19/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.0013

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #2 8/20/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.001

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #3 8/20/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.001

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD ADL 0.00566

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD BDL 0.00465

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non- ICR Phase II - IAADMCornProcessin ng/dscm @ Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD BDL 0.00374

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF EMPC 0.021

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF BDL 0.00428

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF BDL 0.00366

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD BDL 0.00338

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD BDL 0.00293

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD BDL 0.00249

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF EMPC 0.0139

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.00307

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.0023

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00608

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00579

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00522

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00528

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.0181

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.00401

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.00425

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Page 7 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.00319

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00453

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00499

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00476

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00417

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00422

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00302

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.00409

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.0042

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.00356

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00342

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.0038

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00257

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.00557

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non- ICR Phase II - IAADMCornProcessin ng/dscm @ Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.00614

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.00585

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.00503

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.00509

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.00365

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #1 8/11/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00632

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #2 8/11/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00639

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #3 8/12/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00458

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #1 8/11/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00348

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #2 8/11/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00465

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #3 8/12/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00261

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #1 8/11/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.00349

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #2 8/11/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.00327

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #3 8/12/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.0027

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #1 8/11/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF EMPC 0.0116

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #2 8/11/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF BDL 0.00289

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAADMCornProcessin

gCR EU-501B Sample #3 8/12/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF EMPC 0.00342

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter

Coal: Bituminous/Coal: 

Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #1 8/24/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD ADL 0.306

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Page 8 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #2 8/24/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD ADL 0.138

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #3 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD ADL 0.174

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #1 8/24/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF EMPC 0.00701

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #2 8/24/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF BDL 0.00361

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #3 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF BDL 0.00247

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #1 8/24/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD EMPC 0.0154

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #2 8/24/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD EMPC 0.0123

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #3 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD BDL 0.00105

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #1 8/24/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF EMPC 0.00301

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #2 8/24/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.0013

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #3 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.000763

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #1 8/24/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00104

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #2 8/24/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00224

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #3 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00141

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non- ICR Phase II - IAArchersDanielsMidl ng/dscm @ 

N detect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #1 8/24/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00074

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #2 8/24/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00166

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #3 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00125

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #1 8/24/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.00094

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #2 8/24/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.0018

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #3 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.00106

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #1 8/24/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.000855

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #2 8/24/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00184

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #3 8/25/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00116

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #1 8/24/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.000592

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #2 8/24/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00133

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #3 8/25/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.000998

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #1 8/24/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.000701

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #2 8/24/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.00125

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #3 8/25/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.00112

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #1 8/24/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.000569

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #2 8/24/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.000884

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #3 8/25/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.000771

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Page 9 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #1 8/24/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.00105

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #2 8/24/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.00226

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #3 8/25/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.00142

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #1 8/24/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.000896

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #2 8/24/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.00202

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #3 8/25/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.00151

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #1 8/24/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.000714

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #2 8/24/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.0016

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #3 8/25/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.0012

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #1 8/24/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.000578

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #2 8/24/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.000899

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #3 8/25/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.000784

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #1 8/24/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000504

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #2 8/24/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000876

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non- ICR Phase II - IAArchersDanielsMidl ng/dscm @ 

N detect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #3 8/25/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000628

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #1 8/24/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF BDL 0.000387

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #2 8/24/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF BDL 0.000684

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

IAArchersDanielsMidl

andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #3 8/25/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF EMPC 0.00316

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #1 6/4/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 0.01359

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #2 6/5/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 0.00291

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #3 6/5/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 0.00194

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #1 6/4/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF 0.0068

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #2 6/5/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF ND 0.00044

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #3 6/5/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF ND 0.00045

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #1 6/4/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.00255

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #2 6/5/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ND 0.0003

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Page 10 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #3 6/5/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ND 0.00031

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #1 6/4/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 0.00156

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #2 6/5/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF ND 0.00018

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #3 6/5/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF ND 0.00018

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #1 6/4/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.00017

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #2 6/5/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.00017

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #3 6/5/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.00017

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #1 6/4/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.00048

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #2 6/5/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.0001

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #3 6/5/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.00011

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #1 6/4/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF 0.0015

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #2 6/5/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.00021

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #3 6/5/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.00022

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #1 6/4/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD 0.00016

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #2 6/5/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.00016

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #3 6/5/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.00017

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #1 6/4/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.00041

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #2 6/5/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.0001

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #3 6/5/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.0001

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Page 11 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #1 6/4/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD 0.00041

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #2 6/5/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.00022

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #3 6/5/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.00023

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #1 6/4/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF 0.00051

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #2 6/5/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.00021

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #3 6/5/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.00021

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #1 6/4/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD 0.00088

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #2 6/5/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.00015

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #3 6/5/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.00016

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #1 6/4/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF 0.00082

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #2 6/5/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.00011

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #3 6/5/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.00011

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #1 6/4/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.00116

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #2 6/5/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.00012

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #3 6/5/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.00012

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #1 6/4/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.0002

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #2 6/5/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.0002

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #3 6/5/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.00021

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #1 6/4/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.00044

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Page 12 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #2 6/5/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.00044

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #3 6/5/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.00045

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #1 6/4/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF ND 0.00025

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #2 6/5/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.00193

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z

8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of 

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica

Circulating Fluidized 

Bed Boiler (121) Sample #3 6/5/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF ND 0.00026

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 US EPA Method 23

Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric 

Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be 

treated as non-detects Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT IDPotlatch PB-1 CE M23-R1 7/29/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD EMPC 0.002025274

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Fuel Cell Wet Biomass

N

8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be 

treated as non-detects Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT IDPotlatch PB-1 CE M23-R3 7/30/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.001728677

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Fuel Cell Wet Biomass

E

8/10/11 - Review of test report shows run value was errantly 

high and did not match values listed in test report Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT IDPotlatch PB-1 CE M23-R2 7/30/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.0016

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Fuel Cell Wet Biomass

E

8/10/11 - Review of test report shows run value was errantly 

high and did not match values listed in test report Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT IDPotlatch PB-1 CE M23-R3 7/30/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.0015

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Fuel Cell Wet Biomass

N

8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be 

treated as non-detects Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT IDPotlatch PB-1 CE M23-R1 7/29/2009 Total OCDD EMPC 0.008690268

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Fuel Cell Wet Biomass

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #1 9/9/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD ADL 0.0864

ng/dscm @ 

N detect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #1 9/9/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD ADL 0.0864 7% O2 Method 23 Method 23 Fabric Filter Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Coal: Bituminous Downstream Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #2 9/9/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD ADL 0.349

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #3 9/9/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD ADL 0.0609

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #1 9/9/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF EMPC 0.0185

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #2 9/9/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF EMPC 0.0142

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #3 9/9/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF BDL 0.00688

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #1 9/9/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ADL 0.0664

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #2 9/9/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD EMPC 0.0395

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #3 9/9/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ADL 0.0299

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #1 9/9/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF EMPC 0.049

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #2 9/9/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF EMPC 0.0187

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #3 9/9/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF ADL 0.0267

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #1 9/9/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00416

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #2 9/9/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00332

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #3 9/9/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00399

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #1 9/9/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF ADL 0.0339

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #2 9/9/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF ADL 0.0165

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #3 9/9/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.0134

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #1 9/9/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.00378

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Page 13 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #2 9/9/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.00269

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #3 9/9/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.00391

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #1 9/9/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00341

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #2 9/9/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00273

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #3 9/9/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00327

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #1 9/9/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ADL 0.0165

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #2 9/9/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.00891

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #3 9/9/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00267

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #1 9/9/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ADL 0.00741

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #2 9/9/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.00226

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #3 9/9/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.00288

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #1 9/9/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00291

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #2 9/9/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00144

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #3 9/9/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00272

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non- ICR Phase II - ng/dscm @ 

N detect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #1 9/9/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ADL 0.0188

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #2 9/9/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.00336

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #3 9/9/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.00403

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #1 9/9/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.0217

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #2 9/9/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.00793

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #3 9/9/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.00323

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #1 9/9/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ADL 0.00494

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #2 9/9/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ADL 0.00317

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #3 9/9/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00405

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #1 9/9/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF ADL 0.0147

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #2 9/9/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00146

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #3 9/9/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00276

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #1 9/9/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.00216

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #2 9/9/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.00163

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #3 9/9/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.00198

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #1 9/9/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF ADL 0.0078

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #2 9/9/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF EMPC 0.000763

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #3 9/9/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF EMPC 0.0126

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N

8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not 

properly denoted as non-detect Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 1 9/10/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.001082655

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone 

Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

Page 14 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

N

8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not 

properly denoted as non-detect Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 2 9/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.00102339

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone 

Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N

8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not 

properly denoted as non-detect Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 3 9/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.000938367

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone 

Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N

8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not 

properly denoted as non-detect Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 1 9/10/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.000454016

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone 

Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N

8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not 

properly denoted as non-detect Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 2 9/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.000584794

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone 

Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N

8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not 

properly denoted as non-detect Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 3 9/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.000577456

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone 

Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N

8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not 

properly denoted as non-detect Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 3 9/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.000577456

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone 

Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N

8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not 

properly denoted as non-detect Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 1 9/10/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.000698487

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone 

Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N

8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not 

properly denoted as non-detect Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 2 9/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.00095029

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone 

Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N

8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not 

properly denoted as non-detect Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 3 9/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.000613547

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone 

Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N

8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not 

properly denoted as non-detect Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 1 9/10/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.000698487

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone 

Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N

8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not 

properly denoted as non-detect Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 2 9/11/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.000730993

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone 

Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N

8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not 

properly denoted as non-detect Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 3 9/11/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.000577456

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone 

Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N

8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not 

properly denoted as non-detect Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 2 9/11/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.000767542

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone 

Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N

8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not 

properly denoted as non-detect Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 3 9/11/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.000541365

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone 

Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N

8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not 

properly denoted as non-detect Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 2 9/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.000621344

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone 

Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N

8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not 

properly denoted as non-detect Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 3 9/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.000541365

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone 

Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N

8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not 

properly denoted as non-detect Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 2 9/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.000840642

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone 

Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N

8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not 

properly denoted as non-detect Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 3 9/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.000794003

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone 

Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N

8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not 

properly denoted as non-detect Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 2 9/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.001133039

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone 

Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N

8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not 

properly denoted as non-detect Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 3 9/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.000613547

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone 

Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N

8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not 

properly denoted as non-detect Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 1 9/10/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.000663563

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone 

Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N

8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not 

properly denoted as non-detect Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 2 9/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.000804092

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone 

N Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not 

properly denoted as non-detect Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 2 9/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.000804092

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone 

Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N

8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not 

properly denoted as non-detect Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 3 9/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.000866185

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone 

Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N

8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not 

properly denoted as non-detect Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 2 9/11/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.000584794

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone 

Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N

8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not 

properly denoted as non-detect Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 3 9/11/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.000649638

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone 

Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N

8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not 

properly denoted as non-detect Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 1 9/10/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000768336

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone 

Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N

8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not 

properly denoted as non-detect Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 2 9/11/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000730993

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone 

Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N

8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not 

properly denoted as non-detect Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 3 9/11/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000794003

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone 

Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 0.005722235

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #2 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 0.00928921

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD EMPC 0.002783915

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF ND 0.001173642

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #2 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF ND 0.000612857

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF ND 0.000639341

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD EMPC 0.001272905

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #2 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.001715228

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD EMPC 0.000758377

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF ND 0.000759072

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #2 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF EMPC 0.001489743

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF ND 0.000435827

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.001294315

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #2 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000828705

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

Page 15 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000524144

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000848604

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #2 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.001004083

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.000566383

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.001097735

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #2 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.001156333

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.000673899

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.001249549

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #2 8/25/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000813288

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000520304

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000797999

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #2 8/25/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.001002155

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.000497265

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.001012096

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non- ICR Phase II - ng/dscm @ Stoker/SlopedGrate/

N detect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #2 8/25/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.000713072

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.000616301

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.000640345

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #2 8/25/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.000996374

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.000892773

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.001376061

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #2 8/25/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.000892304

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.000597102

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.000854443

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #2 8/25/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.000788234

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.000719978

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #1 8/25/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.001272905

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #2 8/25/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.001586104

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #3 8/27/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000950371

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #1 8/25/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.000564438

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #2 8/25/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.001381818

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #3 8/27/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.000808295

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #1 8/25/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.000517726

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

Page 16 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #2 8/25/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.000477951

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #3 8/27/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.000802536

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #1 8/25/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF ND 0.000661755

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #2 8/25/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF EMPC 0.000370027

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #3 8/27/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF EMPC 0.000360949

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #1 11/17/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 0.0049

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #2 11/17/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 0.0043

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #3 11/18/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 0.0067

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #1 11/17/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF EMPC 0.0013

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #2 11/17/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF EMPC 0.0054

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #3 11/18/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF 0.003

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #1 11/17/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.0017

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #2 11/17/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD EMPC 0.0018

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #3 11/18/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD EMPC 0.0013

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non- ICR Phase II - ng/dscm @ 

Coal: Subbituminous/Process Stoker/SlopedGrate/

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #1 11/17/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 0.0017

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #2 11/17/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF EMPC 0.0011

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #3 11/18/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF EMPC 0.002

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #1 11/17/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.00092

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #2 11/17/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.00111

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #3 11/18/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.0011

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #1 11/17/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.00135

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #2 11/17/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.00086

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #3 11/18/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.00098

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #1 11/17/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.00071

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #2 11/17/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.00026

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #3 11/18/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.00063

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #1 11/17/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.00092

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #2 11/17/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.0012

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #3 11/18/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.00103

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #1 11/17/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.00098

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #2 11/17/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.00049

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #3 11/18/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.0006

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

Page 17 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #1 11/17/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.00134

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #2 11/17/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.00108

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #3 11/18/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.00065

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #1 11/17/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.00121

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #2 11/17/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF 0.0008

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #3 11/18/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF EMPC 0.00049

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #1 11/17/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.001

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #2 11/17/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.0014

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #3 11/18/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.0013

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #1 11/17/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.00076

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #2 11/17/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.00135

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #3 11/18/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.00067

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #1 11/17/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.00083

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #2 11/17/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.00038

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non- ICR Phase II - ng/dscm @ 

Coal: Subbituminous/Process Stoker/SlopedGrate/

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #3 11/18/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.00032

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #1 11/17/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF EMPC 0.0019

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #2 11/17/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF EMPC 0.00047

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #3 11/18/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF EMPC 0.0003

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #1 11/17/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.00056

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #2 11/17/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.00071

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #3 11/18/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.00083

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #1 11/17/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.0024

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #2 11/17/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.0006

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #3 11/18/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.0013

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter

Coal: Subbituminous/Process 

coproduct gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 1 7/23/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.003051898

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 2 7/24/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.001104031

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 3 7/24/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.000685876

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 1 7/23/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF EMPC/ND 0.004359854

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 2 7/24/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF EMPC/ND 0.00215286

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 3 7/24/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF EMPC/ND 0.002661199

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

Page 18 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 1 7/23/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD 0.00059948

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 2 7/24/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000276008

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 3 7/24/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000301786

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 1 7/23/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.001389703

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 2 7/24/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.000441612

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 3 7/24/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000301786

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 1 7/23/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.000735725

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 2 7/24/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.000331209

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 3 7/24/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.000356656

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 1 7/23/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD 0.001089963

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non- MITBSimonPowerPlan ng/dscm @ 

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 2 7/24/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000303609

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 3 7/24/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000329221

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 1 7/23/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.00239792

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 2 7/24/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000331209

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 3 7/24/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000301786

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 1 7/23/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD 0.000490484

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 2 7/24/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD EMPC/ND 0.000386411

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 3 7/24/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.00027435

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 1 7/23/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF EMPC/ND 0.001825689

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 2 7/24/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.000386411

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 3 7/24/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.000301786

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 1 7/23/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD EMPC/ND 0.408736283

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 2 7/24/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.000273248

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 3 7/24/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.00027435

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

Page 19 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 1 7/23/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.000354238

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 2 7/24/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.000414012

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 3 7/24/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.000356656

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 1 7/23/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.001008216

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 2 7/24/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000386411

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 3 7/24/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000329221

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 1 7/23/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.001553198

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 2 7/24/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.000607217

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 3 7/24/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.000301786

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 1 7/23/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.000354238

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non- MITBSimonPowerPlan ng/dscm @ 

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 2 7/24/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.000386411

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 3 7/24/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.000329221

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 1 7/23/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.003842121

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 2 7/24/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF EMPC/ND 0.002566872

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 3 7/24/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF EMPC/ND 0.000603571

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 1 7/23/2009 Total OCDD 0.004986583

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 2 7/24/2009 Total OCDD 0.002732477

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 3 7/24/2009 Total OCDD 0.002194804

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 1 7/23/2009 Total OCDF 0.002288923

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 2 7/24/2009 Total OCDF EMPC/ND 0.000800422

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTMITBSimonPowerPlan

t Unit 1 3 7/24/2009 Total OCDF 0.000768181

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective 

Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea 

Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

A

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #1 7/4/2007 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.006324982

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

A

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #2 7/4/2007 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ND 0.002914143

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

A

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #3 7/5/2007 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ND 0.005397716

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

A

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #1 7/4/2007 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 0.020582544

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

A

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #2 7/4/2007 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 0.03762923

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

A

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #3 7/5/2007 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 0.022799307

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

Page 20 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

A

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #1 7/4/2007 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.001734099

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

A

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #2 7/4/2007 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.001861657

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

A

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #3 7/5/2007 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.003088245

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

A

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #1 7/4/2007 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.005323526

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

A

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #2 7/4/2007 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.005347312

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

A, N

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory; 8/19/11 - Recent guidance 

shows EMPC values should not be treated as non-detects Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #3 7/5/2007 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.003383643

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

A

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #1 7/4/2007 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.002103056

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

A

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #2 7/4/2007 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.002393559

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

A

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #3 7/5/2007 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.003571623

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

A

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #1 7/4/2007 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.001581245

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

A

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #2 7/4/2007 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.001895608

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

A

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #3 7/5/2007 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.003141954

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

A, N

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory; 8/19/11 - Recent guidance 

shows EMPC values should not be treated as non-detects Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #1 7/4/2007 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.002055619

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

A

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #2 7/4/2007 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.002150242

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

A

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #3 7/5/2007 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.001737474

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

A

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #1 7/4/2007 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.001317705

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

A

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #2 7/4/2007 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.001414633

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

A

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #3 7/5/2007 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.002900265

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

A

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #1 7/4/2007 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF 0.001602329

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

A

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #2 7/4/2007 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.001414633

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

A Other

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #2 7/4/2007 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.001414633

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

A

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #3 7/5/2007 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.001823407

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

A

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #1 7/4/2007 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.001792078

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

A

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #2 7/4/2007 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.0019239

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

A

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #3 7/5/2007 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.003195663

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

A

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #1 7/4/2007 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.001344059

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

A

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #2 7/4/2007 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.001601364

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

A

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #3 7/5/2007 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.002132232

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

A, N

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory; 8/19/11 - Recent guidance 

shows EMPC values should not be treated as non-detects Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #1 7/4/2007 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.001591787

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

A

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #2 7/4/2007 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.001414633

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

A

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #3 7/5/2007 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.001831464

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

A, N

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory; 8/19/11 - Recent guidance 

shows EMPC values should not be treated as non-detects Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #1 7/4/2007 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF EMPC 0.002245368

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

A, N

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory; 8/19/11 - Recent guidance 

shows EMPC values should not be treated as non-detects Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #2 7/4/2007 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF EMPC 0.001380682

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

A

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #3 7/5/2007 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.001756272

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

A

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #1 7/4/2007 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.001183299

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

A

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #2 7/4/2007 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.001015706

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

A

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #3 7/5/2007 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.002371235

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

A

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #1 7/4/2007 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.002118869

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

A

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #2 7/4/2007 2,3,7,8-TCDF ND 0.001092096

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

A

1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be 

waste. Added back to inventory Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #3 7/5/2007 2,3,7,8-TCDF ND 0.001826093

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry Litter Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #1 9/22/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ADL 0.00638

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #2 9/23/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ADL 0.00369

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

Page 21 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #3 9/23/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ADL 0.00182

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #1 9/28/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD BDL 0.00187

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #2 9/29/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ADL 0.00135

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #3 9/30/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD BDL 0.00132

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #1 9/22/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF ADL 0.00246

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #2 9/23/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF ADL 0.00171

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #3 9/23/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.00114

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #1 9/28/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.00101

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #2 9/29/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF ADL 0.000767

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #3 9/30/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.000619

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test ICR Phase II - 

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - ng/dscm @ Stoker/SlopedGrate/

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #1 9/22/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00107

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #2 9/23/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.000443

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #3 9/23/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.000526

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #1 9/28/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.0014

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #2 9/29/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.000704

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #3 9/30/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.000869

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #1 9/22/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF ADL 0.000816

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #2 9/23/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF ADL 0.00077

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #3 9/23/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.000523

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #1 9/28/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.000923

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #2 9/29/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00117

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #3 9/30/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.000642

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #1 9/22/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.000726

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #2 9/23/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.000731

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

Page 22 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #3 9/23/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.000642

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #1 9/28/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.00141

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #2 9/29/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.0006

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #3 9/30/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.000916

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #1 9/22/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00223

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #2 9/23/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.000999

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #3 9/23/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.000553

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #1 9/28/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00141

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #2 9/29/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.000694

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #3 9/30/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00085

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test ICR Phase II - 

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - ng/dscm @ Stoker/SlopedGrate/

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #1 9/22/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ADL 0.000766

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #2 9/23/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ADL 0.000737

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #3 9/23/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ADL 0.000825

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #1 9/28/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.000892

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #2 9/29/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00042

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #3 9/30/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00615

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #1 9/22/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.00113

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #2 9/23/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.000794

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #3 9/23/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.000684

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #1 9/28/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.00148

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #2 9/29/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.000657

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #3 9/30/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.000987

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #1 9/22/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ADL 0.00124

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #2 9/23/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00105

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

Page 23 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #3 9/23/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ADL 0.00081

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #1 9/28/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.000963

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #2 9/29/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ADL 0.00239

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #3 9/30/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ADL 0.00109

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #1 9/22/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ADL 0.00176

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #2 9/23/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ADL 0.00101

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #3 9/23/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ADL 0.000744

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #1 9/28/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.00151

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #2 9/29/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.00075

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #3 9/30/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.000979

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test ICR Phase II - 

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - ng/dscm @ Stoker/SlopedGrate/

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #1 9/22/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.000433

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #2 9/23/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.000514

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #3 9/23/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.000517

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #1 9/28/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.00106

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #2 9/29/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.000604

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #3 9/30/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.000854

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #1 9/22/2010 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ADL 0.000766

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #2 9/23/2010 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ADL 0.000734

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #3 9/23/2010 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.000517

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #1 9/28/2010 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.000892

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #2 9/29/2010 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.000487

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #3 9/30/2010 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.000607

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #1 9/22/2010 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00107

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #2 9/23/2010 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00122

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

Page 24 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #3 9/23/2010 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF ADL 0.00105

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #1 9/28/2010 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.000878

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #2 9/29/2010 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF ADL 0.00261

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #3 9/30/2010 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.000697

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #1 9/22/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000901

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #2 9/23/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000737

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #3 9/23/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000523

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #1 9/28/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.00152

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #2 9/29/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDD ADL 0.00105

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #3 9/30/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000924

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test ICR Phase II - 

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - ng/dscm @ Stoker/SlopedGrate/

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #1 9/22/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDF ADL 0.00354

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #2 9/23/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDF ADL 0.0033

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #3 9/23/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDF ADL 0.00182

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #1 9/28/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDF BDL 0.000718

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #2 9/29/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDF ADL 0.0113

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #3 9/30/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDF ADL 0.00415

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #1 9/22/2010 Total OCDD ADL 0.0159

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #2 9/23/2010 Total OCDD ADL 0.0119

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #3 9/23/2010 Total OCDD ADL 0.00678

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #1 9/28/2010 Total OCDD BDL 0.0039

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #2 9/29/2010 Total OCDD BDL 0.00309

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #3 9/30/2010 Total OCDD BDL 0.00435

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #1 9/22/2010 Total OCDF BDL 0.00104

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #2 9/23/2010 Total OCDF BDL 0.000815

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

Page 25 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #3 9/23/2010 Total OCDF BDL 0.000816

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #1 9/28/2010 Total OCDF BDL 0.00228

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #2 9/29/2010 Total OCDF BDL 0.000987

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test 

conducted in 2010 Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F Data 

from Test Report - 

Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Sample #3 9/30/2010 Total OCDF BDL 0.00181

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Naptha/Natural 

A entered into database Major Source Boiler Voluntary Test Report s BF-5002A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.004932424 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Precipitator, General Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

Page 26 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #1 9/15/2010 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #2 9/16/2010 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #3 9/17/2010 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #1 9/15/2010 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #2 9/16/2010 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #3 9/17/2010 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #1 9/15/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000978763

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #2 9/16/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000968846

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been ICR Phase II - Additional D/F from NDGreatPlainsSynfuel ng/dscm @ 

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #3 9/17/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000990294

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #1 9/15/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDF BDL 0.000978763

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #2 9/16/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDF BDL 0.000968846

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #3 9/17/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDF BDL 0.000990294

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #1 9/15/2010 Total OCDD BDL 0.00978763

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #2 9/16/2010 Total OCDD BDL 0.00968846

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #3 9/17/2010 Total OCDD BDL 0.009902936

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #1 9/15/2010 Total OCDF BDL 0.00978763

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #2 9/16/2010 Total OCDF BDL 0.00968846

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #3 9/17/2010 Total OCDF BDL 0.009902936

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

Page 27 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been ICR Phase II - Additional D/F from NDGreatPlainsSynfuel ng/dscm @ 

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #1 9/15/2010 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #2 9/16/2010 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #3 9/17/2010 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #1 9/15/2010 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #2 9/16/2010 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #3 9/17/2010 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #1 9/15/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000978763

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

Page 28 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #2 9/16/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000968846

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #3 9/17/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000990294

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #1 9/15/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDF BDL 0.000978763

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #2 9/16/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDF BDL 0.000968846

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #3 9/17/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDF BDL 0.000990294

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #1 9/15/2010 Total OCDD BDL 0.00978763

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #2 9/16/2010 Total OCDD BDL 0.00968846

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #3 9/17/2010 Total OCDD BDL 0.009902936

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #1 9/15/2010 Total OCDF BDL 0.00978763

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #2 9/16/2010 Total OCDF BDL 0.00968846

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #3 9/17/2010 Total OCDF BDL 0.009902936

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been ICR Phase II - Additional D/F from NDGreatPlainsSynfuel ng/dscm @ 

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

Page 29 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #1 9/15/2010 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #2 9/16/2010 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been ICR Phase II - Additional D/F from NDGreatPlainsSynfuel ng/dscm @ 

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #3 9/17/2010 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #1 9/15/2010 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #2 9/16/2010 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #3 9/17/2010 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #1 9/15/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000978763

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #2 9/16/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000968846

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #3 9/17/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000990294

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #1 9/15/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDF BDL 0.000978763

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #2 9/16/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDF BDL 0.000968846

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #3 9/17/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDF BDL 0.000990294

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #1 9/15/2010 Total OCDD BDL 0.00978763

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #2 9/16/2010 Total OCDD BDL 0.00968846

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #3 9/17/2010 Total OCDD BDL 0.009902936

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #1 9/15/2010 Total OCDF BDL 0.00978763

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #2 9/16/2010 Total OCDF BDL 0.00968846

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #3 9/17/2010 Total OCDF BDL 0.009902936

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

Page 30 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been ICR Phase II - Additional D/F from NDGreatPlainsSynfuel ng/dscm @ 

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #1 9/15/2010 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

Page 31 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #2 9/16/2010 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #3 9/17/2010 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #1 9/15/2010 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #2 9/16/2010 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #3 9/17/2010 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #1 9/15/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000978763

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #2 9/16/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000968846

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #3 9/17/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000990294

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #1 9/15/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDF BDL 0.000978763

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #2 9/16/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDF BDL 0.000968846

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #3 9/17/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDF BDL 0.000990294

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #1 9/15/2010 Total OCDD BDL 0.00978763

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #2 9/16/2010 Total OCDD BDL 0.00968846

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #3 9/17/2010 Total OCDD BDL 0.009902936

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been ICR Phase II - Additional D/F from NDGreatPlainsSynfuel ng/dscm @ 

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #1 9/15/2010 Total OCDF BDL 0.00978763

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #2 9/16/2010 Total OCDF BDL 0.00968846

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #3 9/17/2010 Total OCDF BDL 0.009902936

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

Page 32 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been ICR Phase II - Additional D/F from NDGreatPlainsSynfuel ng/dscm @ 

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #1 9/15/2010 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #2 9/16/2010 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #3 9/17/2010 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #1 9/15/2010 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00487552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #2 9/16/2010 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00484423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #3 9/17/2010 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.004932424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #1 9/15/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000978763

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #2 9/16/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000968846

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #3 9/17/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000990294

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #1 9/15/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDF BDL 0.000978763

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #2 9/16/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDF BDL 0.000968846

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #3 9/17/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDF BDL 0.000990294

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #1 9/15/2010 Total OCDD BDL 0.00978763

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #2 9/16/2010 Total OCDD BDL 0.00968846

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

Page 33 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #3 9/17/2010 Total OCDD BDL 0.009902936

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #1 9/15/2010 Total OCDF BDL 0.00978763

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #2 9/16/2010 Total OCDF BDL 0.00968846

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to 

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been 

entered into database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report

NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #3 9/17/2010 Total OCDF BDL 0.009902936

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas 

Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic 

Precipitator, General

Naptha/Natural 

gas/Phenol/Process 

Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #1 11/19/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.000746

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #2 11/19/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ND 0.00142

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #3 11/22/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.000503

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #1 11/19/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF ND 0.00104

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #2 11/19/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF ND 0.00147

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #3 11/22/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF ND 0.00204

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #1 11/19/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000572

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #2 11/19/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000348

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #3 11/22/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000327

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #1 11/19/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000373

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #2 11/19/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000422

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #3 11/22/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000475

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #1 11/19/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.000323

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #2 11/19/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.000422

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #3 11/22/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.000302

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #1 11/19/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000597

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

A Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #1 11/19/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000597

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #2 11/19/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000348

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #3 11/22/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000327

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #1 11/19/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000348

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #2 11/19/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000397

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #3 11/22/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000452

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #1 11/19/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.000597

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #2 11/19/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.00112

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #3 11/22/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.000553

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #1 11/19/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.000696

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #2 11/19/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.000546

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #3 11/22/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.000452

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #1 11/19/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.000522

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #2 11/19/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.000323

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #3 11/22/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.000302

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #1 11/19/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.000423

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #2 11/19/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.000472

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #3 11/22/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.000528

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #1 11/19/2010 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000398

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #2 11/19/2010 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000447

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #3 11/22/2010 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000503

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #1 11/19/2010 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.00224

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #2 11/19/2010 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.00149

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #3 11/22/2010 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.00138

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #1 11/19/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.00097

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #2 11/19/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.000795

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #3 11/22/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.000754

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #1 11/19/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDF ND 0.000672

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

Page 34 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #2 11/19/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDF ND 0.00166

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #3 11/22/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDF ND 0.000503

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #1 11/19/2010 Total OCDD 0.00298

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #2 11/19/2010 Total OCDD 0.00323

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #3 11/22/2010 Total OCDD 0.00302

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #1 11/19/2010 Total OCDF 0.00149

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #2 11/19/2010 Total OCDF ND 0.00124

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #3 11/22/2010 Total OCDF 0.00201

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas 

Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #1 11/16/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.00546

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #2 11/17/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ND 0.000801

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #3 11/18/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.00373

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #1 11/16/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF ND 0.0039

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #2 11/17/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF ND 0.00358

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #3 11/18/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF ND 0.00373

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #1 11/16/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000585

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #2 11/17/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.00059

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #3 11/18/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000538

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

A to database Major Source Boiler Voluntary Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #3 11/18/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000538 7% O2 EPA Method 23 (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #1 11/16/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.00101

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #2 11/17/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000506

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #3 11/18/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.000828

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #1 11/16/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF 0.00117

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #2 11/17/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.000548

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #3 11/18/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.000662

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #1 11/16/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD 0.00117

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #2 11/17/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.00059

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #3 11/18/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000787

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #1 11/16/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.00117

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #2 11/17/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000506

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #3 11/18/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.000828

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #1 11/16/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.00137

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #2 11/17/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.0011

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #3 11/18/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.000994

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #1 11/16/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.00105

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #2 11/17/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.000843

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #3 11/18/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.00108

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

Page 35 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #1 11/16/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD 0.00078

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #2 11/17/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.000548

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #3 11/18/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD 0.000828

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #1 11/16/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.000975

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #2 11/17/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.00059

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #3 11/18/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.00058

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #1 11/16/2010 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.00187

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #2 11/17/2010 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000548

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #3 11/18/2010 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.0012

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #1 11/16/2010 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.00351

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #2 11/17/2010 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.00295

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #3 11/18/2010 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.0029

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #1 11/16/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.00187

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #2 11/17/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.000585

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added ICR Phase II - Additional D/F from ng/dscm @ 

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #3 11/18/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.00149

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #1 11/16/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.00585

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #2 11/17/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDF ND 0.000885

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #3 11/18/2010 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.00373

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #1 11/16/2010 Total OCDD 0.0101

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #2 11/17/2010 Total OCDD ND 0.00548

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #3 11/18/2010 Total OCDD 0.00621

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #1 11/16/2010 Total OCDF 0.00468

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #2 11/17/2010 Total OCDF 0.00253

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A

5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added 

to database Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary

Additional D/F from 

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #3 11/18/2010 Total OCDF ND 0.00265

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & 

VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction 

(SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD ND 0.00000132

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #2 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 0.00000483

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #3 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 0.00000429

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF ND 0.0000011

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #2 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF 0.000003

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #3 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF 0.000000963

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.0000157

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #2 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.0000239

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

Page 36 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #3 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.000013

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 0.00000789

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #2 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 0.0000121

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #3 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 0.000012

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.0000958

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #2 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.0000721

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #3 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000035

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.0000503

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #2 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.0000503

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #3 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.0000518

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.00000472

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #2 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.00000573

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #3 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.00000357

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.0000868

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, ICR Phase II - NYConEd59thStStatio ng/dscm @ 

C should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #2 8/19/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.0000718

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #3 8/19/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.0000357

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.0000762

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #2 8/19/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.0000438

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #3 8/19/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.0000289

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.0005

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #2 8/19/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.00043

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #3 8/19/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.000389

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.0000195

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #2 8/19/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF 0.0000272

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #3 8/19/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.0000264

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.000103

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #2 8/19/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.0000825

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #3 8/19/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.0000386

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.000116

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #2 8/19/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.0000723

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #3 8/19/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.0000453

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #1 8/19/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.0000738

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

Page 37 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #2 8/19/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.000044

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #3 8/19/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.0000296

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #1 8/19/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.00018

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #2 8/19/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.000259

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #3 8/19/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.000258

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #1 8/19/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.000659

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #2 8/19/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.000675

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #3 8/19/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.000289

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #1 8/19/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.0000595

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #2 8/19/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.0000499

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C

6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, 

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

NYConEd59thStStatio

nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #3 8/19/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.0000711

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 0.0388

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/26/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 0.0321

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 0.0201

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non- ICR Phase II - OHMortonSaltRittma B002 - Coal-Fired ng/dscm @ Stoker/SlopedGrate/

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF 0.0284

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/26/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF 0.0131

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF 0.0133

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.0269

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/26/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.0185

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.0111

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 0.0061

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/26/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 0.0046

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 0.0025

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD EMPC 0.00133

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/26/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD EMPC 0.00085

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD EMPC 0.00049

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.004

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/26/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.0026

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.0017

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF EMPC 0.0012

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/26/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF 0.001

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF EMPC 0.00044

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

Page 38 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD 0.0025

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/26/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD 0.0015

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD 0.0014

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.0044

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/26/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.0027

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.0013

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD 0.0017

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/26/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD EMPC 0.0009

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD EMPC 0.0008

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF 0.0062

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/26/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF 0.0036

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF 0.0025

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD 0.0021

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/26/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD EMPC 0.0008

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non- ICR Phase II - OHMortonSaltRittma B002 - Coal-Fired ng/dscm @ Stoker/SlopedGrate/

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD 0.001

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF EMPC 0.00098

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N, E

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener; 8/26/11 - 

2nd review of test report shows corrected values for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/26/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.0014

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N, E

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener; 8/26/11 - 

2nd review of test report shows corrected values for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.00062

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/25/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.0023

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/26/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.0013

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/27/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.0011

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/25/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF EMPC 0.0064

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/26/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF EMPC 0.0027

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/27/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.0021

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/25/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD EMPC 0.00085

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/26/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD 0.00067

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N, E

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener; 8/26/11 - 

2nd review of test report shows corrected values for this 

congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/27/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.0009

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/25/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF EMPC 0.0048

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/26/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.0031

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

OHMortonSaltRittma

n

B002 - Coal-Fired 

Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/27/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.0027

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Coal

N

8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be 

treated as non-detects Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ORRosboroSpringfield DV 01.1 M23-2 7/23/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD EMPC 0.014339746

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone) Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

N

8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be 

treated as non-detects Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ORRosboroSpringfield DV 01.1 M23-3 7/24/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD EMPC 0.00465567

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone) Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Page 39 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

N

8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be 

treated as non-detects Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ORRosboroSpringfield DV 01.1 M23-2 7/23/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF EMPC 0.001071453

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone) Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

N

8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be 

treated as non-detects Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ORRosboroSpringfield DV 01.1 M23-2 7/23/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.005816459

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone) Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

N

8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be 

treated as non-detects Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ORRosboroSpringfield DV 01.1 M23-2 7/23/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD EMPC 0.005010855

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone) Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

N

8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be 

treated as non-detects Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ORRosboroSpringfield DV 01.1 M23-3 7/24/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD EMPC 0.004703502

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone) Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

N

8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be 

treated as non-detects Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ORRosboroSpringfield DV 01.1 M23-1 7/23/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF EMPC 0.001987753

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone) Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

N

8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be 

treated as non-detects Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ORRosboroSpringfield DV 01.1 M23-2 7/23/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF EMPC 0.00213485

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone) Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

N

8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be 

treated as non-detects Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ORRosboroSpringfield DV 01.1 M23-3 7/24/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.008211199

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone) Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

N

8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be 

treated as non-detects Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ORRosboroSpringfield DV 01.1 M23-2 7/23/2009 Total OCDD EMPC 0.010956211

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone) Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

N

8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be 

treated as non-detects Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ORRosboroSpringfield DV 01.1 M23-3 7/24/2009 Total OCDD EMPC 0.016262956

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone) Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 1 10/8/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ADL 0.007054276

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 3 10/8/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ADL 0.006386825

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 4 10/9/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ADL 0.005316624

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 1 10/8/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF EMPC/ND 0.005791932

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 3 10/8/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF EMPC/ND 0.002903102

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 4 10/9/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF EMPC/ND 0.001852763

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

Natural gas/No. 6 

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 1 10/8/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ADL 0.001559366

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 3 10/8/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000798353

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 4 10/9/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.001047214

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 1 10/8/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF ADL 0.002301922

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 3 10/8/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF ADL 0.001161241

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 4 10/9/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF ADL 0.001047214

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 1 10/8/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.001039578

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 3 10/8/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.000798353

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 4 10/9/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.000886104

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 1 10/8/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ADL 0.002376177

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 3 10/8/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000798353

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 4 10/9/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.001047214

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 1 10/8/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ADL 0.0020049

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

Page 40 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 3 10/8/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ADL 0.001016086

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 4 10/9/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ADL 0.000966659

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 1 10/8/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ADL 0.001633622

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 3 10/8/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.000870931

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 4 10/9/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD EMPC/ND 0.000886104

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 1 10/8/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ADL 0.002524688

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 3 10/8/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ADL 0.001451551

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 4 10/9/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ADL 0.001127769

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 1 10/8/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ADL 0.0013366

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 3 10/8/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.000725776

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non- SCBowaterCoatedPap Combination Boiler ng/dscm @ Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived Stoker/SlopedGrate/

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 4 10/9/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.000966659

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 1 10/8/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.001039578

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 3 10/8/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.001016086

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 4 10/9/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.001047214

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 1 10/8/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ADL 0.001633622

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 3 10/8/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000943508

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 4 10/9/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.001047214

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 1 10/8/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF ADL 0.003787033

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 3 10/8/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF ADL 0.001451551

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 4 10/9/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF ADL 0.001933318

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 1 10/8/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD EMPC/ND 0.001039578

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 3 10/8/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD EMPC/ND 0.001016086

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 4 10/9/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD EMPC/ND 0.000966659

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 1 10/8/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF ADL 0.015445152

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

Page 41 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 3 10/8/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF ADL 0.006822291

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 4 10/9/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF ADL 0.005638843

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 1 10/8/2009 Total OCDD ADL 0.009801731

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 3 10/8/2009 Total OCDD ADL 0.039046727

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 4 10/9/2009 Total OCDD ADL 0.01691653

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 1 10/8/2009 Total OCDF ADL 0.002895966

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 3 10/8/2009 Total OCDF ADL 0.003991766

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERTSCBowaterCoatedPap

er

Combination Boiler 

No. 2 4 10/9/2009 Total OCDF ADL 0.003222196

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23

Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

Natural gas/No. 6 

Residual oil/Tire Derived 

Fuel (TDF)/Wood: Bark Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Wet Biomass

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #1 10/6/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD ADL 0.005665523

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #2 10/6/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD ADL 0.008443842

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #3 10/7/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD ADL 0.011726207

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #1 10/6/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF ADL 0.001155567

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #2 10/6/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF ADL 0.001754851

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #3 10/7/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF BDL 0.00153

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #1 10/6/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ADL 0.003394322

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #2 10/6/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ADL 0.004136259

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #3 10/7/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ADL 0.010942877

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #1 10/6/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF ADL 0.000579031

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #2 10/6/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.000568

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #3 10/7/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF ADL 0.000702623

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #1 10/6/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.000629

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

Page 42 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #2 10/6/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.000651

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #3 10/7/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ADL 0.000469998

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #1 10/6/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.000187

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #2 10/6/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.000213

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #3 10/7/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.000224

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #1 10/6/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.000484

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #2 10/6/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.00046

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #3 10/7/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.000263

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

A, F

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #1 10/6/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ADL 0.000686352

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #2 10/6/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.000605

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #3 10/7/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ADL 0.002587361

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #1 10/6/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00018

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #2 10/6/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.000194

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #3 10/7/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ADL 0.000268231

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #1 10/6/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.000432

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #2 10/6/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.000712

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #3 10/7/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ADL 0.000360806

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #1 10/6/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ADL 0.000193177

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #2 10/6/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.000426

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

Page 43 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #3 10/7/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ADL 0.00026111

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #1 10/6/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ADL 0.000673873

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #2 10/6/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ADL 0.000685297

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #3 10/7/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ADL 0.001493074

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #1 10/6/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.000248

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #2 10/6/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.000262

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #3 10/7/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.000172

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #1 10/6/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.000173

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

A, F

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #2 10/6/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.0002

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #3 10/7/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.000224

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #1 10/6/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.000382

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #2 10/6/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.000419

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #3 10/7/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.000266

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #1 10/6/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000208

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #2 10/6/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000428

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #3 10/7/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ADL 0.000213

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #1 10/6/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF BDL 0.000362

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #2 10/6/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF BDL 0.00022

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F

7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original 

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections 

to fuels burned during ICR testing Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #3 10/7/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF BDL 0.000311

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23

Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, 

General/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Biomass/Boiler 

ash/Coal: 

Bituminous/Paper and 

Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

Page 44 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #1 11/18/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD J 0.0095

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #2 11/18/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD J 0.0072

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #3 11/19/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD J 0.0066

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #1 11/18/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF J 0.003

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #2 11/18/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF J 0.0022

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #3 11/19/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF U 0.0015

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #1 11/18/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.0033

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #2 11/18/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD J 0.002

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #3 11/19/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD J 0.0018

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #1 11/18/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF U/EMPC 0.0072

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #2 11/18/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF U/EMPC 0.0048

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #3 11/19/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF U/EMPC 0.0015

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #1 11/18/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD J 0.0005

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #2 11/18/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD U 0.00037

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for ICR Phase II - TNMilanArmyAmmun D88L-1, Source #27- ng/dscm @ 

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #3 11/19/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD U 0.00033

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #1 11/18/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF J 0.0024

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #2 11/18/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF J 0.0013

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #3 11/19/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF J 0.00054

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #1 11/18/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF U/EMPC 0.00066

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #2 11/18/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF U 0.00034

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #3 11/19/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF U 0.00039

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #1 11/18/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD U/EMPC 0.00072

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #2 11/18/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD J 0.00051

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #3 11/19/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD U 0.00036

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #1 11/18/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF J 0.0021

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #2 11/18/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF J 0.0012

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #3 11/19/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF J 0.0011

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #1 11/18/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD U/EMPC 0.00044

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #2 11/18/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD U 0.00028

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #3 11/19/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD U 0.00033

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #1 11/18/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF J 0.0013

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #2 11/18/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF J 0.00074

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

Page 45 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #3 11/19/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF J 0.00081

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #1 11/18/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD J 0.0005

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #2 11/18/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD U 0.00034

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #3 11/19/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD U 0.00033

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #1 11/18/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF U 0.00044

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #2 11/18/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF U 0.00037

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #3 11/19/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF U 0.00039

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #1 11/18/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF J 0.0015

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #2 11/18/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF J 0.00068

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #3 11/19/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF J 0.00051

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #1 11/18/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF J 0.0025

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #2 11/18/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF J 0.0016

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #3 11/19/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF U/EMPC 0.0014

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #1 11/18/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD U 0.00038

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for ICR Phase II - TNMilanArmyAmmun D88L-1, Source #27- ng/dscm @ 

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #2 11/18/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD U 0.00028

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #3 11/19/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD U 0.00042

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #1 11/18/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF U 0.0063

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #2 11/18/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.0031

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N

New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report 

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for 

this congener Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

TNMilanArmyAmmun

itionPlant

D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #3 11/19/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF U 0.0039

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/4/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 0.0735

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/4/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 1.0077

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/5/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 0.0397

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/4/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF 0.0307

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/4/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF 0.4327

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/5/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF 0.0213

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/4/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.0374

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/4/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.449

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/5/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD EMPC 0.0147

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/4/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 0.0384

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/4/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 0.3621

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/5/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 0.0215

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/4/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD 0.0044

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

Page 46 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/4/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD EMPC 0.0187

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N, E

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener; 8/26/11 - 

2nd review of test report showed detection limits for this 

congener and ng/dscm values were calculated Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/5/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.002784298

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/4/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.0107

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/4/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.0771

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/5/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.0062

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/4/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF EMPC 0.0098

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/4/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF 0.1195

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/5/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF 0.0034

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/4/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD EMPC 0.0052

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/4/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD 0.0476

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N, E

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener; 8/26/11 - 

2nd review of test report showed detection limits for this 

congener and ng/dscm values were calculated Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/5/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.002702246

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/4/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.0133

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/4/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.0869

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

N detect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source Boiler Templates DioxinFurans o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/4/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.0869 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Bituminous/Natural gas Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream Downstream PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/5/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.0071

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/4/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD 0.003

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/4/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD EMPC 0.012

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N, E

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener; 8/26/11 - 

2nd review of test report showed detection limits for this 

congener and ng/dscm values were calculated Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/5/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.001312832

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/4/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF 0.0082

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/4/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF 0.0394

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/5/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF EMPC 0.0048

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/4/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD EMPC 0.0043

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/4/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD EMPC 0.0314

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N, E

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener; 8/26/11 - 

2nd review of test report showed detection limits for this 

congener and ng/dscm values were calculated Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/5/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.002981223

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/4/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF 0.0067

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/4/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF 0.0622

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/5/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF EMPC 0.0023

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/4/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.0181

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/4/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.1581

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/5/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.0076

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/4/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.0148

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

Page 47 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/4/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.0746

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/5/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF EMPC 0.0053

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/4/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD 0.0019

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/4/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD EMPC 0.0022

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N, E

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener; 8/26/11 - 

2nd review of test report showed detection limits for this 

congener and ng/dscm values were calculated Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/5/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.001318302

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/4/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF EMPC 0.0075

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/4/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.0204

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

N

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major Source BoilerICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/5/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.0042

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter

Coal: 

Bituminous/Natural gas Downstream PC Coal

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF 0.0289

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF ND 0.00928

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF ND 0.0158

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF 0.078

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF 0.00823

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF 0.0977

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Z Burner Wet Biomass

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF 0.0977

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.013

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.355

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.0171

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.484

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.0261

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.42

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 0.0844

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF ND 0.00551

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 0.187

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 0.0115

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 0.205

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 0.0188

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9 OCDD 0.178

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9 OCDD ND 0.0114

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9 OCDD 0.0211

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9 OCDD 0.333

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9 OCDD 0.305

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9 OCDD 0.0262

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Page 48 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD 0.0618

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD 0.00274

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD 0.0752

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD 0.00362

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD 0.00488

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD 0.0653

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.0809

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.00558

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.0106

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.151

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.0165

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.151

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF 0.0331

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.00197

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' ICR Phase II - ng/dscm @ Dutch Oven/Pile 

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.00285

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF 0.0827

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF 0.00597

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF 0.0918

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD 0.00462

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD 0.133

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD 0.122

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD 0.00591

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD 0.00769

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD 0.103

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.0922

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.0051

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.175

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.0126

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.177

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.0165

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD 0.0827

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.0036

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Page 49 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD 0.102

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD 0.00691

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD 0.0855

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.00687

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF 0.145

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF 0.00843

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF 0.25

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF 0.0188

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF 0.243

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF 0.0259

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.00344

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD 0.103

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD 0.102

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD 0.00537

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' ICR Phase II - ng/dscm @ Dutch Oven/Pile 

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD 0.0828

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD 0.0048

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF 0.00603

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF 0.102

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF 0.208

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF 0.0119

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF 0.0163

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF 0.204

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.0466

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.00131

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.094

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.00605

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.0945

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.0071

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.218

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.0108

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.361

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.0243

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Page 50 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.0331

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.353

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD 0.028

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.00118

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.00381

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD 0.0453

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD 0.0408

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.00523

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.0124

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.198

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.319

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.0268

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.0356

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Z

10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full 

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' 

values are the correct Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaper No. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.311

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be WAKimberlyClarkEver No. 14 Cogeneration ng/dscm @ Stoker/SlopedGrate/

N

8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be 

treated as non-detects Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT

WAKimberlyClarkEver

ett

No. 14 Cogeneration 

Boiler M23-R1 8/18/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD EMPC 0.00205631

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Natural gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

N

8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be 

treated as non-detects Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT

WAKimberlyClarkEver

ett

No. 14 Cogeneration 

Boiler M23-R3 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD EMPC 0.001077097

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Natural gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

N

8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be 

treated as non-detects Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT

WAKimberlyClarkEver

ett

No. 14 Cogeneration 

Boiler M23-R2 8/18/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.001379813

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Natural gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

N

8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be 

treated as non-detects Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT

WAKimberlyClarkEver

ett

No. 14 Cogeneration 

Boiler M23-R3 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.001921469

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Natural gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

N

8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be 

treated as non-detects Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT

WAKimberlyClarkEver

ett

No. 14 Cogeneration 

Boiler M23-R3 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF EMPC 0.001342641

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Natural gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

N

8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be 

treated as non-detects Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT

WAKimberlyClarkEver

ett

No. 14 Cogeneration 

Boiler M23-R3 8/19/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD EMPC 0.00209452

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Natural gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

N

8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be 

treated as non-detects Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT

WAKimberlyClarkEver

ett

No. 14 Cogeneration 

Boiler M23-R1 8/18/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.005686358

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Natural gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

N

8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be 

treated as non-detects Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT

WAKimberlyClarkEver

ett

No. 14 Cogeneration 

Boiler M23-R2 8/18/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.000960533

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Natural gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

N

8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be 

treated as non-detects Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT

WAKimberlyClarkEver

ett

No. 14 Cogeneration 

Boiler M23-R3 8/19/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.0020617

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Natural gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

N

8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be 

treated as non-detects Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT

WAKimberlyClarkEver

ett

No. 14 Cogeneration 

Boiler M23-R3 8/19/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD EMPC 0.000904045

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Natural gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

N

8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be 

treated as non-detects Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT

WAKimberlyClarkEver

ett

No. 14 Cogeneration 

Boiler M23-R2 8/18/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF EMPC 0.00074454

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Natural gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

N

8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be 

treated as non-detects Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT

WAKimberlyClarkEver

ett

No. 14 Cogeneration 

Boiler M23-R3 8/19/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF EMPC 0.001629071

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Natural gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

N

8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be 

treated as non-detects Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT

WAKimberlyClarkEver

ett

No. 14 Cogeneration 

Boiler M23-R3 8/19/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD EMPC 0.001614153

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Natural gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

N

8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be 

treated as non-detects Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT

WAKimberlyClarkEver

ett

No. 14 Cogeneration 

Boiler M23-R3 8/19/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF EMPC 0.000808568

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Natural gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

N

8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be 

treated as non-detects Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT

WAKimberlyClarkEver

ett

No. 14 Cogeneration 

Boiler M23-R2 8/18/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF EMPC 0.001517032

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Natural gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

N

8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be 

treated as non-detects Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT

WAKimberlyClarkEver

ett

No. 14 Cogeneration 

Boiler M23-R1 8/18/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD EMPC 0.000648552

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Natural gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

N

8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be 

treated as non-detects Major Source Boiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT

WAKimberlyClarkEver

ett

No. 14 Cogeneration 

Boiler M23-R2 8/18/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF EMPC 0.001079964

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Natural gas Downstream

Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #1 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 0.002465929

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Page 51 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #2 8/13/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 0.002162146

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #3 8/13/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD ND 0.00205

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #1 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF ND 0.00108

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #2 8/13/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF ND 0.000854

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #3 8/13/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF ND 0.000878

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #1 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ND 0.000587

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #2 8/13/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ND 0.000511

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #3 8/13/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ND 0.000655

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

E, Z

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #1 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 0.000580889

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #2 8/13/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 0.000673757

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #3 8/13/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF ND 0.000424

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #1 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000775

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #2 8/13/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000717

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #3 8/13/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.00048

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #1 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000672

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #2 8/13/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000383

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #3 8/13/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000321

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #1 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.000293

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #2 8/13/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.000518

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Page 52 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #3 8/13/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.000503

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #1 8/12/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000712

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #2 8/13/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000658

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #3 8/13/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000441

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #1 8/12/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000262

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #2 8/13/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000312

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #3 8/13/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000262

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #1 8/12/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.000569

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

E, Z

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #2 8/13/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.000646

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #3 8/13/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.000405

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #1 8/12/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.000738

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #2 8/13/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.000619

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #3 8/13/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.000556

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #1 8/12/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.000681

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #2 8/13/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.000631

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #3 8/13/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.000421

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #1 8/12/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.000364

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #2 8/13/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.000435

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #3 8/13/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.000365

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Page 53 of 54
Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions

Change 

Code Note For Changes Made Major Source? Classification Data Source SourceTab Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Congener Name

NonDetect?Congener 

Emissions

Congener 

Emission Unit Pollutant_Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

Upstream/

Downstream? Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #1 8/12/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000319

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #2 8/13/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.00038

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #3 8/13/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000319

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #1 8/12/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.00076

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #2 8/13/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.00064

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #3 8/13/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.000579

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #1 8/12/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.000524

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #2 8/13/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.000441

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

E, Z

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #3 8/13/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.000602

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #1 8/12/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.0023862

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #2 8/13/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.002649089

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z

8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially 

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as 

detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed 

improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or 

baseline analyses Major Source Boiler

ICR Phase II - 

Templates DioxinFurans

WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra

ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #3 8/13/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.002098978

ng/dscm @ 

7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream

Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner Wet Biomass

Page 54 of 54
Appendix B: New Facilities Identified from ICF Inventory

CARiversideCement RIVERSIDE CEMENT CO - Qwest

19409 NATIONAL TRAIL 

HIGHWAY

COAtmel ATMEL CORP 1150 E CHEYENNE MTN BLVD

COUSAirForce

U.S. AIR FORCE BUCKLEY AFB 

CO 8120 EDGERTON DR, SUITE 40

GAHerculesBrunswick

HERCULES INC - BRUNSW ICK 

GA 2801 COOK STREET

GAHerculesSavannah HERCULES INC 3000 LOUISVILLE RD

ILCornProductsInt

CORN PRODUCTS SPECIALTY 

INGREDIENTS 6400 SOUTH ARCHER AVE

ILCornProductsInt

CORN PRODUCTS SPECIALTY 

INGREDIENTS 6400 SOUTH ARCHER AVE

ILCornProductsInt

CORN PRODUCTS SPECIALTY 

INGREDIENTS 6400 SOUTH ARCHER AVE

ILCornProductsInt

CORN PRODUCTS SPECIALTY 

INGREDIENTS 6400 SOUTH ARCHER AVE

INArcelorMittalEastChicago ARCELORMITTAL USA INC 3210 WATLING STREET

INArcelorMittalEastChicago ARCELORMITTAL USA INC 3210 WATLING STREET

INArcelorMittalEastChicago ARCELORMITTAL USA INC 3210 WATLING STREET

INArcelorMittalEastChicago ARCELORMITTAL USA INC 3210 WATLING STREET

INArcelorMittalEastChicago ARCELORMITTAL USA INC 3210 WATLING STREET

KSInnovia INNOVIA FILMS INC 6000 S.E. 2ND ST.

KSInnovia INNOVIA FILMS INC 6000 S.E. 2ND ST.

KSInnovia INNOVIA FILMS INC 6000 S.E. 2ND ST.

KSInnovia INNOVIA FILMS INC 6000 S.E. 2ND ST.

KYAirProducts

AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS 

INC 412 N MAIN ST

KYAirProducts

AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS 

INC 412 N MAIN ST

KYAirProducts

AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS 

INC 412 N MAIN ST

KYAirProducts

AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS 

INC 412 N MAIN ST

KYAirProducts

AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS 

INC 412 N MAIN ST

Facility ID Facility Name Address
KYAirProducts

AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS 

INC 412 N MAIN ST

KYAirProducts

AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS 

INC 412 N MAIN ST

LAOccidentalChem OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORP 7377 HWY 3214

MOAshland MISSOURI CHEMICAL WORKS 11083 HIGHWAY D

MOAshland MISSOURI CHEMICAL WORKS 11083 HIGHWAY D

MOAshland MISSOURI CHEMICAL WORKS 11083 HIGHWAY D

NCBurlingtonIndustries

BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES 

RAEFORD FACILITY 1001 TURNPIKE RD

NCBurlingtonIndustries

BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES 

RAEFORD FACILITY 1001 TURNPIKE RD

NCBurlingtonIndustries

BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES 

RAEFORD FACILITY 1001 TURNPIKE RD

NCCoatsAmerican

COATS AMERICAN SEVIER 

PLANT 630 AMERICAN THREAD ROAD

NCDakAmericas

DAK AMERICAS LLC CAPE FEAR 

SITE 3500 DANIELS ROAD NE

NCDakAmericas

DAK AMERICAS LLC CAPE FEAR 

SITE 3500 DANIELS ROAD NE

NCDakAmericas

DAK AMERICAS LLC CAPE FEAR 

SITE 3500 DANIELS ROAD NE

NCDakAmericas

DAK AMERICAS LLC CAPE FEAR 

SITE 3500 DANIELS ROAD NE

NCDakAmericas

DAK AMERICAS LLC CAPE FEAR 

SITE 3500 DANIELS ROAD NE

NCDakAmericas

DAK AMERICAS LLC CAPE FEAR 

SITE 3500 DANIELS ROAD NE

NCDakAmericas

DAK AMERICAS LLC CAPE FEAR 

SITE 3500 DANIELS ROAD NE

NCDakAmericas

DAK AMERICAS LLC CAPE FEAR 

SITE 3500 DANIELS ROAD NE

NCIACAlbemarle

INTERNATIONAL AUTOMOTIVE 

COMPONENTS ALBEMARLE 

PLANT 313 BETHANY ROAD

NDTesoro

TESORO REFINING & 

MARKETING CO - MANDAN 

REFINERY 900 OLD RED TRAIL NE

NDTesoro

TESORO REFINING & 

MARKETING CO - MANDAN 

REFINERY 900 OLD RED TRAIL NE
NDTesoro

TESORO REFINING & 

MARKETING CO - MANDAN 

REFINERY 900 OLD RED TRAIL NE

NDTesoro

TESORO REFINING & 

MARKETING CO - MANDAN 

REFINERY 900 OLD RED TRAIL NE

NDTesoro

TESORO REFINING & 

MARKETING CO - MANDAN 

REFINERY 900 OLD RED TRAIL NE

NDTesoro

TESORO REFINING & 

MARKETING CO - MANDAN 

REFINERY 900 OLD RED TRAIL NE

NDTesoro

TESORO REFINING & 

MARKETING CO - MANDAN 

REFINERY 900 OLD RED TRAIL NE

NDTesoro

TESORO REFINING & 

MARKETING CO - MANDAN 

REFINERY 900 OLD RED TRAIL NE

NDTesoro

TESORO REFINING & 

MARKETING CO - MANDAN 

REFINERY 900 OLD RED TRAIL NE

NDTesoro

TESORO REFINING & 

MARKETING CO - MANDAN 

REFINERY 900 OLD RED TRAIL NE

NDTesoro

TESORO REFINING & 

MARKETING CO - MANDAN 

REFINERY 900 OLD RED TRAIL NE

NDTesoro

TESORO REFINING & 

MARKETING CO - MANDAN 

REFINERY 900 OLD RED TRAIL NE

NDTesoro

TESORO REFINING & 

MARKETING CO - MANDAN 

REFINERY 900 OLD RED TRAIL NE

NDTesoro

TESORO REFINING & 

MARKETING CO - MANDAN 

REFINERY 900 OLD RED TRAIL NE

NDTesoro

TESORO REFINING & 

MARKETING CO - MANDAN 

REFINERY 900 OLD RED TRAIL NE

NJChemtura CHEMTURA CORP 1000 CONVERY BLVD

NJHercules HERCULES INC (PARLIN PLANT) 50 S MINNISINK AVE

NJPolyOne POLYONE CORP RT 130 & PORCUPINE RD

NJPolyOne POLYONE CORP RT 130 & PORCUPINE RD

NYMortonSalt MORTON SALT 45 RIBAUD AVE E

NYMortonSalt MORTON SALT 45 RIBAUD AVE E

NYMortonSalt MORTON SALT 45 RIBAUD AVE E
NYWyeth WYETH 64 MAPLE ST

OHEmeraldPerformance

EMERALD POLYMER ADDITIVES 

LLC 240 WEST EMERLING AVENUE

OHEmeraldPerformance

EMERALD POLYMER ADDITIVES 

LLC 240 WEST EMERLING AVENUE

OHEmeraldPerformance

EMERALD POLYMER ADDITIVES 

LLC 240 WEST EMERLING AVENUE

OHEmeraldPerformance

EMERALD POLYMER ADDITIVES 

LLC 240 WEST EMERLING AVENUE

OHEmeraldPerformance

EMERALD POLYMER ADDITIVES 

LLC 240 WEST EMERLING AVENUE

OHFormica FORMICA CORP 10155 READING RD

OHFormica FORMICA CORP 10155 READING RD

OHFormica FORMICA CORP 10155 READING RD

OHFormica FORMICA CORP 10155 READING RD

OHGoodyear GOODYEAR AKRON PLANT 5 1144 E MARKET ST

PADuPontTowanda DUPONT TOWANDA PLANT PATTERSON BLVD RR 1 BOX 15

PADuPontTowanda DUPONT TOWANDA PLANT PATTERSON BLVD RR 1 BOX 15

PADuPontTowanda DUPONT TOWANDA PLANT PATTERSON BLVD RR 1 BOX 15

PADuPontTowanda DUPONT TOWANDA PLANT PATTERSON BLVD RR 1 BOX 15

PADuPontTowanda DUPONT TOWANDA PLANT PATTERSON BLVD RR 1 BOX 15

PAFortIndiantownGap

U.S. ARMY NATIONAL GUARD 

FORT INDIANTOWN GAP 

RANGES FT INDIANTOWN GAP

PANovaChem NOVA CHEMICALS INC 400 FRANKFORT RD

TXAlon

ALON USA - BIG SPRING 

REFINERY

INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon

ALON USA - BIG SPRING 

REFINERY

INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon

ALON USA - BIG SPRING 

REFINERY

INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon

ALON USA - BIG SPRING 

REFINERY

INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon

ALON USA - BIG SPRING 

REFINERY

INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon

ALON USA - BIG SPRING 

REFINERY

INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon

ALON USA - BIG SPRING 

REFINERY

INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon

ALON USA - BIG SPRING 

REFINERY

INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20
TXAlon

ALON USA - BIG SPRING 

REFINERY

INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon

ALON USA - BIG SPRING 

REFINERY

INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon

ALON USA - BIG SPRING 

REFINERY

INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon

ALON USA - BIG SPRING 

REFINERY

INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon

ALON USA - BIG SPRING 

REFINERY

INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon

ALON USA - BIG SPRING 

REFINERY

INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon

ALON USA - BIG SPRING 

REFINERY

INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon

ALON USA - BIG SPRING 

REFINERY

INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon

ALON USA - BIG SPRING 

REFINERY

INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon

ALON USA - BIG SPRING 

REFINERY

INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon

ALON USA - BIG SPRING 

REFINERY

INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon

ALON USA - BIG SPRING 

REFINERY

INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon

ALON USA - BIG SPRING 

REFINERY

INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon

ALON USA - BIG SPRING 

REFINERY

INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon

ALON USA - BIG SPRING 

REFINERY

INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon

ALON USA - BIG SPRING 

REFINERY

INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon

ALON USA - BIG SPRING 

REFINERY

INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon

ALON USA - BIG SPRING 

REFINERY

INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon

ALON USA - BIG SPRING 

REFINERY

INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon

ALON USA - BIG SPRING 

REFINERY

INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon

ALON USA - BIG SPRING 

REFINERY

INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon

ALON USA - BIG SPRING 

REFINERY

INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon

ALON USA - BIG SPRING 

REFINERY

INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20
TXAlon

ALON USA - BIG SPRING 

REFINERY

INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon

ALON USA - BIG SPRING 

REFINERY

INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

WABPCherryPoint

BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - 

Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD

WABPCherryPoint

BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - 

Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD

WABPCherryPoint

BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - 

Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD

WABPCherryPoint

BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - 

Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD

WABPCherryPoint

BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - 

Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD

WABPCherryPoint

BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - 

Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD

WABPCherryPoint

BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - 

Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD

WABPCherryPoint

BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - 

Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD

WABPCherryPoint

BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - 

Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD

WABPCherryPoint

BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - 

Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD

WABPCherryPoint

BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - 

Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD

WABPCherryPoint

BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - 

Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD

WABPCherryPoint

BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - 

Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD

WABPCherryPoint

BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - 

Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD

WABPCherryPoint

BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - 

Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD

WABPCherryPoint

BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - 

Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD

WABPCherryPoint

BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - 

Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD

WABPCherryPoint

BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - 

Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD

WABPCherryPoint

BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - 

Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD

WABPCherryPoint

BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - 

Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD

WABPCherryPoint

BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - 

Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD
WABPCherryPoint

BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - 

Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD

WABPCherryPoint

BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - 

Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD

WVAmericanWoodmark

AMERICAN WOODMARK 

HARDY COUNTY PLANT INDUSTRIAL PARK RD, RT 220 S

WVAmericanWoodmark

AMERICAN WOODMARK 

HARDY COUNTY PLANT INDUSTRIAL PARK RD, RT 220 S

WYNewcastleRefinery WYOMING REFINING CO 740 W MAIN STREET
ORO GRANDE CA 92368

COLORADO SPRINGS CO 80906

AIR FORCE ACADEMY CO 80840

BRUNSWICK GA 31521 EU01

SAVANNAH GA 31415

BEDFORD PARK IL 60501 B05

BEDFORD PARK IL 60501 B06

BEDFORD PARK IL 60501 B07

BEDFORD PARK IL 60501 B10

EAST CHICAGO IN 46312 12" Bar Mill ISBC Office Boiler

EAST CHICAGO IN 46312

No. 3 Continuous Annealing and 

Aging Furnace

EAST CHICAGO IN 46312 No. 5 Batch Annealing Furnaces

EAST CHICAGO IN 46312 No. 5 Galvanizing Furnace

EAST CHICAGO IN 46312 No. 6 Batch Annealing Furnaces

TECUMSEH KS 66542 EU01

TECUMSEH KS 66542 EU02

TECUMSEH KS 66542 EU03

TECUMSEH KS 66542 EU04

CALVERT CITY KY 42029 BA-2401

CALVERT CITY KY 42029 PA-2101A-1

CALVERT CITY KY 42029 PA-2101A-2

CALVERT CITY KY 42029 PA-2101B-1

CALVERT CITY KY 42029 PA-2101B-2

City State Zip Unit ID
CALVERT CITY KY 42029 PA-2101C-1

CALVERT CITY KY 42029 PA-2101C-2

CONVENT LA 70723

LOUISIANA MO 63353 EU01

LOUISIANA MO 63353 EU02

LOUISIANA MO 63353 EU03

RAEFORD NC 28376 EU01

RAEFORD NC 28376 EU02

RAEFORD NC 28376 EU03

WOODLAWN NC 28752

LELAND NC 28451 EU01

LELAND NC 28451 EU02

LELAND NC 28451 EU03

LELAND NC 28451 EU04

LELAND NC 28451 EU11

LELAND NC 28451 EU12

LELAND NC 28451 EU13

LELAND NC 28451 EU14

ALBEMARLE NC 28001

MANDAN ND 58554 EUI 11A Heater H-2001

MANDAN ND 58554 EUI 11B Heater H-2002
MANDAN ND 58554 EUI 2A-1 Heater B-1

MANDAN ND 58554 EUI 2A-2 Heater B-2

MANDAN ND 58554 EUI 3A Heater H-501

MANDAN ND 58554 EUI 3C Heater H-50

MANDAN ND 58554 EUI 4A-1 Heater F-1

MANDAN ND 58554 EUI 4A-2 Heater F-2

MANDAN ND 58554 EUI 4A-3 Heater F-3

MANDAN ND 58554 EUI 4B Heater F-100

MANDAN ND 58554 EUI 4C Heater F-200

MANDAN ND 58554 EUI 4D Heater F-5A

MANDAN ND 58554 EUI 5A Boiler #1

MANDAN ND 58554 EUI 5B Boiler #2

MANDAN ND 58554 EUI 5C Boiler #3

PERTH AMBOY NJ 08062

PARLIN NJ 08859-1045

OLDMANS TOWNSHIP NJ 08067 E200 Boiler #2

OLDMANS TOWNSHIP NJ 08067 E201 Boiler #1

SILVER SPRINGS NY 14550 EU01

SILVER SPRINGS NY 14550 EU02

SILVER SPRINGS NY 14550 EU03
ROUSES POINT NY 12979

AKRON OH 44301 EU01 (coal boiler)

AKRON OH 44301 EU02 (Gas Boiler #1)

AKRON OH 44301 EU03 (Gas Boiler #2)

AKRON OH 44301

EU04 (ARD Dowtherm Process 

Heater)

AKRON OH 44301

EU06 (DPA A/O Dowtherm Process 

Heater)

CINCINNATI OH 45241-3109 B001

CINCINNATI OH 45241-3109 B002

CINCINNATI OH 45241-3109 B003

CINCINNATI OH 45241-3109 B004

AKRON OH 44316

TOWANDA PA 18848 031

TOWANDA PA 18848 032

TOWANDA PA 18848 033

TOWANDA PA 18848 034

TOWANDA PA 18848 035

ANNVILLE PA 17003

MONACA PA 15061

BIG SPRING TX 79720 #23 Boiler

BIG SPRING TX 79720 #24 Boiler

BIG SPRING TX 79720 Alky Hot Oil Heater

BIG SPRING TX 79720 Big Vacuum Heater

BIG SPRING TX 79720 Clay Tower Heater

BIG SPRING TX 79720 CO Boiler

BIG SPRING TX 79720 Crude Heater A

BIG SPRING TX 79720 Crude Heater B
BIG SPRING TX 79720 Crude Heater D

BIG SPRING TX 79720 Diesel Charge Heater

BIG SPRING TX 79720 Diesel Stabilizer Reboiler

BIG SPRING TX 79720 East C8 Column Heater

BIG SPRING TX 79720 FCCU Air Heater

BIG SPRING TX 79720 FCCU Preheater

BIG SPRING TX 79720 Gas Oil HDS Charge Heater

BIG SPRING TX 79720 GTR Process Heater

BIG SPRING TX 79720 Horizontal Asphalt Box Heater

BIG SPRING TX 79720 LDH Charge Heater

BIG SPRING TX 79720 LSG Hydrogen Preheat Heater

BIG SPRING TX 79720 LSG Hydrogen Stripper Reboiler

BIG SPRING TX 79720 Naphtha HDS Charge Heater

BIG SPRING TX 79720 Naphtha HDS Depent Reboiler

BIG SPRING TX 79720 PDA Asphalt Heater

BIG SPRING TX 79720 PDA Gas Oil Heater

BIG SPRING TX 79720 PDA Tea Kettle Superheater

BIG SPRING TX 79720 PMA Hot Oil Heater

BIG SPRING TX 79720 Reformer #1 Reheat

BIG SPRING TX 79720 Reformer #2 Reheat 

BIG SPRING TX 79720 Reformer #3 Reheat

BIG SPRING TX 79720 Reformer Charge Heater

BIG SPRING TX 79720 Reformer Depent Reboiler
BIG SPRING TX 79720 Vertical Asphalt Box Heater

BIG SPRING TX 79720 West C8 Column Heater

BLAINE WA 98230 #1 Reformer Heater

BLAINE WA 98230 #2 DHDS Charge Heater

BLAINE WA 98230 #2 Reformer Heater

BLAINE WA 98230 #4 Boiler

BLAINE WA 98230 #5 Boiler

BLAINE WA 98230 #6 Boiler

BLAINE WA 98230 #7 Boiler

BLAINE WA 98230 1st Stage Fract Reboiler

BLAINE WA 98230 2nd Stage Fract Reboiler

BLAINE WA 98230 Coker #1 (North)

BLAINE WA 98230 Coker #2 (South)

BLAINE WA 98230 Crude Heater

BLAINE WA 98230 DHDS Charge Heater

BLAINE WA 98230 DHDS Stabilizer Reboiler

BLAINE WA 98230 H2 Plant #1 Furnace

BLAINE WA 98230 H2 Plant #2 Furnace

BLAINE WA 98230 IHT Heater

BLAINE WA 98230 Naphtha HDS Charge Heater

BLAINE WA 98230 Naphtha HDS Stripper Reboiler

BLAINE WA 98230 North Vacuum Heater

BLAINE WA 98230 R-1 Reaction Heater
BLAINE WA 98230 R-4 Reaction Heater

BLAINE WA 98230 South Vacuum Heater

MOOREFIELD WV 26836 B1

MOOREFIELD WV 26836 B2

NEWCASTLE WY 82701
Boiler 350 8500 Wet Biomass

Stoker/SlopedGrat

e/Other

Boiler 312.5 700 Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 600 1200 Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 480 1650 Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 1670 8400 Coal FB

Boiler 1.3 3000 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 108 8760 Gas 1 - Metal Furnace N/A

Process Heater 136 8760 Gas 1 - Metal Furnace N/A

Process Heater 112.6 8760 Gas 1 - Metal Furnace N/A

Process Heater 205 8760 Gas 1 - Metal Furnace N/A

Boiler 50.2 8736 Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 50.2 8736 Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 50.2 8736 Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 50.2 8736 Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 10 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 10 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 10 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 10 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 10 8760 Gas 1 N/A

N/A - area source of HAP emissions

Classification Design Capacity 

(MMBtu/hr)

Annual Hours 

of Operation Fuel Category Combustor Design

N/A - no applicable combustion units on site

N/A - area source of HAP emissions

N/A - area source of HAP emissions
Boiler 10 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 10 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 43.75 7344 Coal

Stoker/SlopedGrat

e/Other

Boiler 28.75 7344 Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 37.5 7344 Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 240 7321 Coal PC

Boiler 240 7321 Coal PC

Boiler 80 7321 Heavy Liquid N/A

Boiler 80 7321 Heavy Liquid N/A

Boiler 27 7321 Heavy Liquid N/A

Boiler 27 7321 Heavy Liquid N/A

Boiler 13 7321 Heavy Liquid N/A

Boiler 14 7321 Heavy Liquid N/A

Process Heater 22.5 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 18.2 8760 Gas 1 N/A

N/A - area source of HAP emissions

Boiler shut down on May 7, 2011

Boiler shut down on May 7, 2011

Boiler shut down on May 7, 2011

N/A - area source of HAP emissions

N/A - area source of HAP emissions
Process Heater 84.72 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 60.75 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 60 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 6.5 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 32 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 25.6 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 18.6 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 29.23 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 56.92 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 6.07 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 240 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 240 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 240 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 98 8760 Light Liquid N/A

Boiler 73.3 8736 Light Liquid N/A

Boiler 138 7321 Coal PC

Boiler 92.5 6198 Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 138 6198 Gas 1 N/A

N/A - area source of HAP emissions

N/A - area source of HAP emissions
Boiler 125 8568 Coal

Stoker/SlopedGrat

e/Other

Boiler 37.5 500 Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 125 500 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 125 8592 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 125 8592 Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 73.5 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 73.5 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 73.5 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 28.7 8760 Wet Biomass

Stoker/SlopedGrat

e/Other

Boiler 30.5 8568 Heavy Liquid N/A

Boiler 30.5 8568 Heavy Liquid N/A

Boiler 33.5 8568 Heavy Liquid N/A

Boiler 15 8568 Heavy Liquid N/A

Boiler 30.5 8568 Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 242.6 8377 Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 210.9 5383 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 11.64 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 47.31 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 14.84 8034 Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 163.35 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 101.23 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 101.23 6072 Gas 1 N/A

N/A - area source of HAP emissions

N/A - area source of HAP emissions

N/A - no applicable combustion units on site

N/A - area source of HAP emissions
Process Heater 100 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 59 8376 Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 21.11 8376 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 9.99 8046 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 2 147 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 63 8424 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 13.2 8136 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 9.9 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 19.2 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 18 8256 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 21 8424 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 15 8376 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 21.3 8448 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 38.25 8472 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 22.64 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 13.8 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 2.17 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 4.5 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 40.96 8496 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 62.9 8496 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 25.53 8496 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 46.58 8496 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 30.11 8376 Gas 1 N/A
Process Heater 10 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 9.99 8046 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 1075 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 35 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 330 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 216 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 363 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 363 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 363 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 198 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 183 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 190 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 190 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 720 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 48 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 56 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 325 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 325 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 13 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 110 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 86 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 77 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 121 8760 Gas 1 N/A
Process Heater 79 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 207 8760 Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 13.3 8760 Dry Biomass

Stoker/SlopedGrat

e/Other

Boiler 14.4 8760 Dry Biomass

Stoker/SlopedGrat

e/Other

N/A - area source of HAP emissions
Major or Area 

Source of HAP 

Emissions?

Unit 

Permanently 

Shut Down?

Test Report 

Submitted?

Major Source No No

Area Source No No

Area Source No No

No Major Source No No

Area Source No No

No Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

No Major Source No Yes

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

Low NOx 

Burners?

Facility Response
No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

Area Source No No

Major Source Yes No

Major Source Yes No

Major Source Yes No

No Area Source No Yes

No Area Source No No

No Area Source No No

Area Source No No

No Major Source No Yes

No Major Source No Yes

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

Area Source No No

Yes Major Source No Yes

Yes Major Source No Yes
Yes Major Source No Yes

Yes Major Source No Yes

Yes Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

Area Source No No

Area Source No No

No Major Source No Yes

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No Yes

No Major Source No Yes

No Major Source No No
Area Source No No

No Major Source No Yes

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

Area Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No Yes

Area Source No No

Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No Yes

No Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No Yes

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No Yes

Yes Major Source No Yes
Yes Major Source No Yes

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No Yes

No Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No Yes

No Major Source No Yes

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No Yes

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

No Major Source No Yes

No Major Source No Yes

No Major Source No Yes

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No Yes

Yes Major Source No No
No Major Source No No

No Major Source No Yes

No Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No
No Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

No Major Source No Yes

No Major Source No Yes

Area Source No No
Notes on Operation Status

Boilers no longer in operation and no longer permitted to 

operate; no applicable combustion units on site.

No applicable combustion units have ever been in operation 

at this site.

Facility Response
Facility no longer combusts coal; all units combust natural 

gas (with hydrogen and process gas as backup fuels).

Boiler shut down on May 7, 2011.

Boiler shut down on May 7, 2011.

Boiler shut down on May 7, 2011.

Facility submitted unit-level data and test report even though 

facility is an area source of HAP.
All boilers on site have been decomissioned.
Legal owner is Pfizer, Inc.

Boiler decomissioned in 2007.

Coal-fired boiler decomissioned in 2002.



Appendix C: Summary of Data Corrections and Additions from Reconsideration Petitions

Organization Comment Date Affected Facility ID Affected Unit ID Summary of Data Corrections or Additions

HIChevronKapolei F-5103 Attachments included test report for filterable particulate matter emissions testing conducted in December, 

2009. The emissions testing data in this report have been processed into the EPA ICR databases.

HIChevronKapolei F-5153 Attachments included test report for filterable particulate matter emissions testing conducted in December, 

2009. The emissions testing data in this report have been processed into the EPA ICR databases.

HITesoro SG1102

Attachments included test report for metallic HAP and filterable particulate matter emissions testing 

conducted in December, 2010. The emissions testing data in this report have been processed into the EPA ICR 

databases.

Boiler No. 2 Attachments included additional filterable particulate matter emissions testing data from November, 2010. 

These emissions testing data have been processed into the EPA ICR databases.

Boiler No. 3 Attachments included additional filterable particulate matter emissions testing data from November, 2010. 

These emissions testing data have been processed into the EPA ICR databases.

Boiler No. 6 Attachments included additional filterable particulate matter emissions testing data from November, 2010. 

These emissions testing data have been processed into the EPA ICR databases.

Boiler No. 1 Attachments included additional filterable particulate matter emissions testing data from December, 2010. 

These emissions testing data have been processed into the EPA ICR databases.

Boiler No. 2 Attachments included additional filterable particulate matter emissions testing data from December, 2010. 

These emissions testing data have been processed into the EPA ICR databases.

Boiler No. 3 Attachments included additional filterable particulate matter emissions testing data from December, 2010. 

These emissions testing data have been processed into the EPA ICR databases.

Boiler No. 4 Attachments included additional filterable particulate matter emissions testing data from December, 2010. 

These emissions testing data have been processed into the EPA ICR databases.

Boiler No. 5 Attachments included additional filterable particulate matter emissions testing data from December of 1994, 

1995, 1996, 1997, and 2010. These emissions testing data have been processed into the EPA ICR databases.

Boiler No. 8 Attachments included additional filterable particulate matter emissions testing data from December, 2010. 

These emissions testing data have been processed into the EPA ICR databases.

N/A Attachments included additional bagasse fuel analysis data for metallic HAP sampling done in January, 2011. 

These fuel sampling data have been processed into the EPA ICR databases.

Boiler No. 1 Attachments included additional filterable particulate matter emissions testing data from November, 2010. 

These emissions testing data have been processed into the EPA ICR databases.

Boiler No. 2 Attachments included additional filterable particulate matter emissions testing data from November, 2010. 

These emissions testing data have been processed into the EPA ICR databases.

Boiler No. 4 Attachments included additional filterable particulate matter emissions testing data from November, 2010. 

These emissions testing data have been processed into the EPA ICR databases.

Boiler No. 7 Attachments included additional filterable particulate matter emissions testing data from November, 2010. 

These emissions testing data have been processed into the EPA ICR databases.

Boiler No. 8 Attachments included additional filterable particulate matter emissions testing data from November, 2010. 

These emissions testing data have been processed into the EPA ICR databases.

Boiler 1 Attachments included additional filterable particulate matter emissions testing data from August, 2010. These 

emissions testing data have been processed into the EPA ICR databases.

Boiler 2 Attachments included additional filterable particulate matter emissions testing data from August, 2010. These 

emissions testing data have been processed into the EPA ICR databases.

Boiler 3 Attachments included additional filterable particulate matter emissions testing data from August, 2010. These 

emissions testing data have been processed into the EPA ICR databases.

N/A Attachments included additional bagasse fuel analysis data for metallic HAP sampling done in August, 2010. 

These fuel sampling data have been processed into the EPA ICR databases.

National Renderers Association (NRA) July 15, 2011 N/A N/A Comments included processed fats fuel sampling data for metallic HAP. However, the data could not be 

attributed to a facility. Thus, these additional data were not processed in the EPA ICR databases.

American Petroleum Institute (API) & National 

Petrochemical and Refiners Association (NPRA) July 15, 2011

Florida Sugar Industry July 15, 2011

FLOsceolaFarms

FLSugarCaneGrowersCoop

FLUSSugarCorp

HIPuuneneSugarMill

Page 1 of 2
Appendix C: Summary of Data Corrections and Additions from Reconsideration Petitions

Organization Comment Date Affected Facility ID Affected Unit ID Summary of Data Corrections or Additions

MNAndersonCorpBayport Boiler 11 EU620 Comments specified that this unit should be a suspension burner and not a stoker. This classification change 

was processed in the EPA ICR databases.

MNAndersonCorpBayport Boiler 12 EU621 Comments specified that this unit should be a suspension burner and not a stoker. This classification change 

was processed in the EPA ICR databases.

MNWeyerhaeuserIronton EU 001 - 4 Cell 

Furnace

Comments specified that this unit should be a fuel cell and not a stoker. This classification change was 

processed in the EPA ICR databases.

ORStimsonLumberForestGrove Boiler 1 Comments specified that this unit should be a pile burner and not a stoker. This classification change was 

processed in the EPA ICR databases.

ORStimsonLumberForestGrove Boiler 2 Comments specified that this unit should be a pile burner and not a stoker. This classification change was 

processed in the EPA ICR databases.

ORStimsonLumberForestGrove Boiler 3 Comments specified that this unit should be a pile burner and not a stoker. This classification change was 

processed in the EPA ICR databases.

MNGPDuluth EU33 Boiler #3

Comments specified that mercury emissions testing data from September, 2009 were reported erroneously. 

The test company did not include all of the non-detect fraction levels in the sum of mass from the analytical 

report. Updated mercury emission values for the three test runs were submitted. However, NCASI submitted 

emissions corrections for the same test in 2010, and the emission values were corrected then. The corrected 

values submitted by NCASI were different than those specified by RMA, but it was assumed that NCASI 

provided the more accurate emission values. Thus, this correction was not processed in the EPA ICR 

databases.

NYConEd59thStStationNewYork Boiler 118

Comments specified that mercury emissions testing data from August, 2009 were reported erroneously. The 

analytical laboratory failed to analyze all five fractions of the EPA Method 29 samples (only fractions 5b and 5c 

were sampled). This test was flagged in the EPA ICR databases and was not used in any analyses.

Comments also specified that dioxin/furan emissions testing data from August, 2009 were reported 

erroneously. Corrected total mass values were provided. These corrections were processed in the EPA ICR 

databases.

SCMilliken-Dewey D30

Comments specified that dioxin/furan emissions testing data from August, 2009 were reported erroneously. 

Corrected total mass values were provided. Combined with a review of dioxin/furan congener emissions done 

by EPA, the appropriate dioxin/furan emissions data were corrected in the EPA ICR databases. The corrected 

emissions match the values specified by RMA.

Temple-Inland, Inc. July 15, 2011 GATempleInlandRome WF

Facility submitted additional hourly CO continuous emissions monitoring (CEM) data spanning from July, 2009, 

to April, 2011. These additional data were processed into the EPA ICR databases.

WVWeyerhaeuserBuckhannon 001-01

Facility submitted emissions testing report from August, 2010 that contained additional data for CO, NOx, SO2, 

THC, and PM. These additional data were processed into the EPA ICR databases.

WVWeyerhaeuserBuckhannon 001-02

Facility submitted emissions testing report from August, 2010 that contained additional data for NOx, SO2, and 

THC. These additional data were processed into the EPA ICR databases.

National Council for Air and Stream Improvement 

(NCASI) July 15, 2011

Rubber Manufacturers Association (RMA) July 15, 2011

Weyerhaeuser Company July 14, 2011

Page 2 of 2
Appendix D: Combustion Units Reclassified as Major Source Boilers from CISWI

FacilityID UnitID Classification

Design 

Capacity 

(MMBtu/hr)

Annual 

Hours of 

Operation

Fuel 

Category Combustor Design Reason for Reclassification

CAChineseStation Unit 1 Boiler 370 8760 Biomass FB Urban wood processed prior to combustion.

CACovantaDelano Unit 1 Boiler 400 8760 Biomass FB Urban wood processed prior to combustion.

CACovantaDelano Unit 2 Boiler 315 8760 Biomass FB Urban wood processed prior to combustion.

CACovantaMendota Unit 1 Boiler 317 8760 Biomass FB Urban wood processed prior to combustion.

CAPacificOroville Boiler 1 Boiler 175 8760 Biomass Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other C&D biomass processed prior to combustion.

CAPacificOroville Boiler 2 Boiler 175 8760 Biomass Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other C&D biomass processed prior to combustion.

CAThermalEnergyDev BLR1 Boiler 70.52 8760 Biomass Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other Urban wood processed prior to combustion.

MEBoralex Boiler #1 Boiler 585.9 8256 Biomass Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other C&D biomass processed prior to combustion.

MIHillmanPower EUBoiler Boiler 300 8760 Biomass Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other Process-derived fuels generated on-site.

NYBlackRiverGen E00001 Boiler 201.25 8760 Coal FB Metal wiring removed from TDF prior to combustion.

NYBlackRiverGen E00002 Boiler 201.25 8760 Coal FB Metal wiring removed from TDF prior to combustion.

NYBlackRiverGen E00003 Boiler 201.25 8760 Coal FB Metal wiring removed from TDF prior to combustion.

PAKimberlyClarkChester Boiler #10 (ID 035) Boiler 975 800 Coal FB Anthracite culm no longer classified as solid waste.

WAPortTownsendPaper #10 Power Boiler Boiler 1355.797143 8640 Biomass Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other

C&D biomass processed prior to combustion; process-derived fuels 

generated on-site.

Page 1 of 1
Appendix E: Summary of Fuel Analysis Corrections Identified by ORCR

FacilityID

Potential Issue with Reported Fuel Analysis Data (Identified by 

ORCR) Did Facility Respond to Clarification Request? Actions Taken to Correct Data in EPA ICR Database

ALCargill-Decatur

Mercury (Hg) samples from bituminous coal were reported in 

units of mg/g. Compared to other mg/g data from other facilities, 

these data are orders of magnitude higher. Potentially should 

have been reported in units of mg/kg. No

Assumed that units of measure should have been 

reported as mg/kg; corrected units to mg/kg and restandardized to lb/MMBtu.

ALIPPineHill

Cadmium (Cd) samples from bituminous coal were reported in 

units of mg/g. Data for all other metallic HAP were reported in 

units of mg/kg, but all are on the same order of magnitude. 

Potentially should have reported Cd data in units of mg/kg.

Yes - specified that units of measure should be 

mg/kg instead of mg/g.

Corrected units to mg/kg and re-standardized to 

lb/MMBtu.

MOIP&LMissouriCity

Metallic HAP samples from bituminous coal were reported in 

units of mg/g. Compared to other mg/g data from other facilities, 

these data are orders of magnitude higher. Potentially should 

have been reported in units of mg/kg.

Yes - specified that units of measure should be 

μg/g (or equivalent mg/kg).

Corrected units to μg/g and re-standardized to 

lb/MMBtu.

MOIPLBlueValley

Metallic HAP samples from bituminous coal were reported in 

units of mg/g. Compared to other mg/g data from other facilities, 

these data are orders of magnitude higher. Potentially should 

have been reported in units of mg/kg.

Yes - specified that units of measure should be 

μg/g (or equivalent mg/kg).

Corrected units to μg/g and re-standardized to 

lb/MMBtu.

NCCampLejeuneMCB

Metallic HAP samples from bituminous coal were reported in 

units of mg/g. Compared to other mg/g data from other facilities, 

these data are orders of magnitude higher. Potentially should 

have been reported in units of mg/kg.

Yes - specified that units of measure should be 

mg/kg instead of mg/g.

Corrected units to mg/kg, however the values could 

not be re-standardized to lb/MMBtu due to a lack of 

HHV for the samples. Facility confirmed that no HHV 

data were available.

NCKapStone

Metallic HAP samples from bituminous coal were reported in 

units of mg/g. Compared to other mg/g data from other facilities, 

these data are orders of magnitude higher. Potentially should 

have been reported in units of mg/kg. No

Assumed that units of measure should have been 

reported as mg/kg; corrected units to mg/kg and restandardized to lb/MMBtu.

NCNC_DukeUniversity_Durham

Mercury (Hg) samples from bituminous coal were reported in 

units of mg/g. Compared to other mg/g data from other facilities, 

these data are orders of magnitude higher. Potentially should 

have been reported in units of mg/kg.

Yes - specified that units of measure should be 

mg/kg instead of mg/g.

Corrected units to mg/kg, however the values could 

not be re-standardized to lb/MMBtu due to a lack of 

HHV for the samples. Facility confirmed that no HHV 

data were available.

PAAppletonPapers

Lead (Pb) samples from bituminous coal were reported in units of 

mg/g. Data for all other metallic HAP were reported in units of 

mg/kg, but all are on the same order of magnitude. Potentially 

should have reported Pb data in units of mg/kg. No

Assumed that units of measure should have been 

reported as mg/kg; corrected units to mg/kg and restandardized to lb/MMBtu.

Page 1 of 2
Appendix E: Summary of Fuel Analysis Corrections Identified by ORCR

FacilityID

Potential Issue with Reported Fuel Analysis Data (Identified by 

ORCR) Did Facility Respond to Clarification Request? Actions Taken to Correct Data in EPA ICR Database

PAHorseheadCorpMonaco

Mercury (Hg) samples from sub-bituminous coal were reported in 

units of mg/g. Compared to other mg/g data from other facilities, 

these data are orders of magnitude higher. Potentially should 

have been reported in units of mg/kg.

Yes - specified that units of measure should be 

mg/kg.

Corrected units to mg/kg and re-standardized to 

lb/MMBtu.

Page 2 of 2
Appendix F-1: Summary of Top 20 Percent Test Reports Requested

Facility ID Unit ID

CO Test 

Date

HCl Test 

Date

Hg Test 

Date

PM Test 

Date

TSM8 Test 

Date

Test Report 

Submitted? Notes

ARGeorgiaPacificCrossett93 SN-WB2 Wood Boiler 8/8/2006 Yes

ARLeolaLumberMill SN-01A 6/14/2006 6/14/2006 Yes Facility is now owned by West Fraser, Inc.

ARLeolaLumberMill SN-01B 6/14/2006 6/14/2006 Yes Facility is now owned by West Fraser, Inc.

AZCatalystPaperSnowflake Power Boiler #2 Coal 5/30/2007 Yes

AZCatalystPaperSnowflake Power Boiler #2 Coal 8/8/2007 Yes

CACovantaDelano Unit 1 4/21/2009 Yes

CAPacificOroville Boiler 1 8/23/2005 Yes Determined to be an area source facility.

CAPacificOroville Boiler 2 8/23/2005 Yes Determined to be an area source facility.

CAThermalEnergyDev BLR1 5/31/2000 Yes

FLGPHawthorne EU 001 Wood Fired Boiler 5/22/2007 Yes

FLIPPensacola Power Boiler 4 / EU ID 37 3/7/2006 No

GAGPMadisonPly 800 Wood Waste Boiler 6/19/2003 Yes Test report had previously been submitted.

GAGPMadisonPly 800 Wood Waste Boiler 6/16/2006 Yes Test report had previously been submitted.

GAGPMonticelloPlywood EU700 - Wood Waste Boiler 2/7/2007 Yes

GAGPMonticelloPlywood EU700 - Wood Waste Boiler 2/7/2007 Yes

GAGPMonticelloPlywood EU700 - Wood Waste Boiler 11/20/2008 Yes

GAGPWarmSprings EU600 Wood Fuel Boiler 10/26/2004 No

GAInternationalPaperAugustaMills PB3A 10/4/2005 Yes

GAInternationalPaperAugustaMills PB3A 8/10/2007 Yes

GAIPSavannah No. 13 Power Boiler - PB13 3/26/2002 Yes

GAIPSavannah No. 13 Power Boiler - PB13 1/29/2003 Yes

GAIPSavannah No. 13 Power Boiler - PB13 6/17/2004 Yes

GAIPSavannah No. 13 Power Boiler - PB13 6/22/2006 Yes

GAIPSavannah No. 13 Power Boiler - PB13 5/10/2007 Yes

GATempleInlandRome PB4 2/27/2008 No E-mail failed to reach facility.

GATempleInlandRome PB4 2/27/2008 No E-mail failed to reach facility.

GATempleInlandRome WF 2/28/2008 No E-mail failed to reach facility.

GATempleInlandRome WF 7/22/2008 No E-mail failed to reach facility.

GATempleInlandRome WF 2/28/2008 No E-mail failed to reach facility.

IAADMCornProcessingCR EU-530 11/20/2002 No

IAMuscatinePowerandWater Unit 7 4/22/2004 4/22/2004 Yes

IAMuscatinePowerandWater Unit 7 10/10/2006 Yes

IDPotlatch PB-1 CE 7/20/2006 No

IDPotlatch PB-2 Riley 7/27/2006 No

IDTASCONampa Babcock and Wilcox (B&W) #1 12/4/2006 Yes

IDTASCONampa Babcock and Wilcox (B&W) #2 12/4/2006 Yes

ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler 7/20/2004 No

ILRockIslandArsenal NBN 12602 (Boiler #1) 3/13/2007 Yes Submitted hard copy version of test report.

LAGPPortHudson EQT0109 - No. 6 CFB Boiler 9/11/2007 Yes

LAGPPortHudson EQT0109 - No. 6 CFB Boiler 12/18/2008 Yes

LAGPPortHudson EQT0109 - No. 6 CFB Boiler 12/19/2008 Yes

MENewPage-Rumford PB#5 38699 Yes

MIHillmanPower EUBoiler 7/1/1998 Yes Determined to be an area source facility.

MIHillmanPower EUBoiler 1/1/2003 Yes Determined to be an area source facility.

MILPCSagola TOH-Wood 2/5/1997 Yes

Submitted hard copy version of test report in July, 

2011.

MILPCSagola TOH-Wood 4/4/2000 Yes

Submitted hard copy version of test report in July, 

2011.

Page 1 of 3
Appendix F-1: Summary of Top 20 Percent Test Reports Requested

Facility ID Unit ID

CO Test 

Date

HCl Test 

Date

Hg Test 

Date

PM Test 

Date

TSM8 Test 

Date

Test Report 

Submitted? Notes

MILPCSagola TOH-Wood 5/8/2002 Yes

Submitted hard copy version of test report in July, 

2011.

MILPCSagola TOH-Wood 3/2/2005 Yes

Submitted hard copy version of test report in July, 

2011.

MITBSimonPowerPlant Unit 1 6/13/2007 Yes

MITBSimonPowerPlant Unit 1 6/14/2007 Yes

MNHibbing Unit 1A 9/21/2004 Yes

Submitted hard copy version of test report in 

September, 2011.

MNHibbing Unit 2A 9/22/2004 Yes

Submitted hard copy version of test report in 

September, 2011.

MNMinnesotaSoybeanProcessors Boiler 1 EU026 11/21/2006 Yes

MNMinnesotaSoybeanProcessors Boiler 1 EU026 12/6/2006 Yes

MNMinnesotaSoybeanProcessors Boiler 2 EU027 11/21/2006 Yes

MNMinnesotaSoybeanProcessors Boiler 2 EU027 12/6/2006 Yes

MSHoodWiggins AA-002 (Wood-Fired Boiler No. 2) 4/8/2003 Yes

NCDomtar 66-25-2050 (No. 1 Package Boiler) Liquid Firing 6/4/2008 Yes Granted an excusal from test report request.

NCHanesDyeWinstonSalem ES B01 3/21/2007 No E-mail failed to reach facility.

NCHanesDyeWinstonSalem ES B02 3/21/2007 No E-mail failed to reach facility.

NCLPRoaringRiver Boiler #2 10/13/2004 Yes Test report had previously been submitted.

NCMCASCherryPoint CP-152-BOIL-03 2/28/2006 No

NCTysonHarmony TYS-ES-21 9/25/2006 No

NDCargillWestFargo Foster Wheeler Boiler (EU43) 8/3/2005 Yes

NYMortonSalt EU01 10/25/2007 No

OHAppletonIdeas Boiler 4 (B003) 1/31/2003 No E-mail failed to reach facility.

ORGeorgiaPacificWaunaMill EU35 - Fluidized Bed Boiler 4/27/2004 Yes

Submitted test report on thumb drive sent by U.S. 

mail.

ORGeorgiaPacificWaunaMill EU35 - Fluidized Bed Boiler 3/15/2005 Yes

Submitted test report on thumb drive sent by U.S. 

mail.

ORGeorgiaPacificWaunaMill EU35 - Fluidized Bed Boiler 3/27/2007 Yes

Submitted test report on thumb drive sent by U.S. 

mail.

ORGeorgiaPacificWaunaMill EU35 - Fluidized Bed Boiler 3/20/2008 Yes

Submitted test report on thumb drive sent by U.S. 

mail.

ORGeorgiaPacificWaunaMill EU35 - Fluidized Bed Boiler 3/17/2009 Yes

Submitted test report on thumb drive sent by U.S. 

mail.

ORRosboroSpringfield DV 01.2 7/31/2006 Yes

PADomtarJohnsonburg #81 Coal Boiler 7/18/2007 Yes

PADomtarJohnsonburg #82 Coal Boiler 7/18/2007 Yes

PAKimberlyClarkChester Boiler #10 (ID 035) 9/1/2003 Yes Submitted hard copy version of test report.

SCCogenSouth B001 - Main Boiler 11/25/2003 11/25/2003 11/25/2003 Yes

SCCogenSouth B001 - Main Boiler 11/3/2005 11/3/2005 11/3/2005 Yes

SCCogenSouth B001 - Main Boiler 11/7/2007 11/7/2007 11/7/2007 Yes

SCCogenSouth B002 - Auxiliary Boiler #1 11/14/2006 Yes

SCCogenSouth B002 - Auxiliary Boiler #1 11/30/2004 Yes

SCCogenSouth B003 - Auxiliary Boiler #2 11/14/2006 Yes

SCCogenSouth B003 - Auxiliary Boiler #2 11/30/2004 Yes

SCCogenSouth B004 - Auxiliary Boiler #3 11/14/2006 Yes

SCCogenSouth B004 - Auxiliary Boiler #3 11/30/2004 Yes

SCInternationalPaperEastover No. 2 Power Boiler 7/26/2006 Yes

Page 2 of 3
Appendix F-1: Summary of Top 20 Percent Test Reports Requested

Facility ID Unit ID

CO Test 

Date

HCl Test 

Date

Hg Test 

Date

PM Test 

Date

TSM8 Test 

Date

Test Report 

Submitted? Notes

VASmurfitStoneWestpt PB08 11/8/2004 No E-mail failed to reach facility.

VASmurfitStoneWestpt PB08 4/13/2005 No E-mail failed to reach facility.

VAVirginiaPolytechnic Boiler 11 2/27/2007 Yes

WANipponPaper #10 Package Boiler 37970 Yes

WAWeyerhaeuserLongview No. 11 Hog Fuel Boiler 10/7/2008 Yes Test report had previously been submitted.

WIAlgoma B03 8/6/1991 Yes Submitted hard copy version of test report.

WIMilwaukeePowerPlant Boiler B21 6/12/2007 Yes

WINewPage-WisconsinRapids Power Boiler 1 - B21 12/14/2005 Yes

WINewPage-WisconsinRapids Power Boiler 2 - B20 9/18/2003 Yes

Page 3 of 3
Appendix F-2: Summary of Findings from Late Test Report Review for Mercury Top Performers

Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Pollutant Test Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

90% Fuel 

Category Note For Changes Made

GAGPMonticelloPlywood EU700 - Wood Waste Boiler Sample #1 2/7/2007 Mercury (Hg) Method 5/29

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

/MDF Scraps/Plywood Sander 

Dust/Wood: Bark/Wood: Plywood, 

Particleboard (containing glues or 

resins)/ Solid

Late review of test report showed that not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Removed from floor 

analysis but still in baseline analysis given time constraints.

GAGPMonticelloPlywood EU700 - Wood Waste Boiler Sample #2 2/7/2007 Mercury (Hg) Method 5/29

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

/MDF Scraps/Plywood Sander 

Dust/Wood: Bark/Wood: Plywood, 

Particleboard (containing glues or 

resins)/ Solid

Late review of test report showed that not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Removed from floor 

analysis but still in baseline analysis given time constraints.

GAGPMonticelloPlywood EU700 - Wood Waste Boiler Sample #3 2/7/2007 Mercury (Hg) Method 5/29

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic 

Precipitator

/MDF Scraps/Plywood Sander 

Dust/Wood: Bark/Wood: Plywood, 

Particleboard (containing glues or 

resins)/ Solid

Late review of test report showed that not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Removed from floor 

analysis but still in baseline analysis given time constraints.

IAUofIowa EP7 Boiler 11 Sample #1 2/22/2006 Mercury (Hg) Method 29

Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric 

Filter /Biomass/Coal: Bituminous/ Solid

Late review of test report shows not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Data removed from floor 

analysis but not from baseline analysis given time constraints

IAUofIowa EP7 Boiler 11 Sample #2 2/23/2006 Mercury (Hg) Method 29

Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric 

Filter /Biomass/Coal: Bituminous/ Solid

Late review of test report shows not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Data removed from floor 

analysis but not from baseline analysis given time constraints

IAUofIowa EP7 Boiler 11 Sample #3 2/23/2006 Mercury (Hg) Method 29

Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric 

Filter /Biomass/Coal: Bituminous/ Solid

Late review of test report shows not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Data removed from floor 

analysis but not from baseline analysis given time constraints

ILPolyOne B1 Sample #1 11/14/2006 Mercury (Hg)

Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone 

Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid

Late test report review replaced reported average with the actual data for the 3 test runs. Test 

runs included in floor analysis but not baseline analysis given time constraints

ILPolyOne B1 Sample #2 11/14/2006 Mercury (Hg)

Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone 

Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid

Late test report review replaced reported average with the actual data for the 3 test runs. Test 

runs included in floor analysis but not baseline analysis given time constraints

ILPolyOne B1 Sample #3 11/14/2006 Mercury (Hg)

Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone 

Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid

Late test report review replaced reported average with the actual data for the 3 test runs. Test 

runs included in floor analysis but not baseline analysis given time constraints

MINeenahPaperMI Boiler 1 Sample #1 7/25/2006 Mercury (Hg) EPA Method 29 Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid

late review of test report shows that not all 5 fractions were analyzed; removed from floor 

analysis but is still in baseline analysis given time constraints

MINeenahPaperMI Boiler 1 Sample #2 7/25/2006 Mercury (Hg) EPA Method 29 Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid

late review of test report shows that not all 5 fractions were analyzed; removed from floor 

analysis but is still in baseline analysis given time constraints

MINeenahPaperMI Boiler 1 Sample #3 7/25/2006 Mercury (Hg) EPA Method 29 Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid

late review of test report shows that not all 5 fractions were analyzed; removed from floor 

analysis but is still in baseline analysis given time constraints

MINeenahPaperMI Boiler 1 Sample #1 8/1/2006 Mercury (Hg) EPA Method 29 Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid

late review of test report shows that not all 5 fractions were analyzed; removed from floor 

analysis but is still in baseline analysis given time constraints

MINeenahPaperMI Boiler 1 Sample #2 8/1/2006 Mercury (Hg) EPA Method 29 Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid

late review of test report shows that not all 5 fractions were analyzed; removed from floor 

analysis but is still in baseline analysis given time constraints

MINeenahPaperMI Boiler 1 Sample #3 8/1/2006 Mercury (Hg) EPA Method 29 Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid

late review of test report shows that not all 5 fractions were analyzed; removed from floor 

analysis but is still in baseline analysis given time constraints

MINeenahPaperMI Boiler 1 Sample #1 8/2/2006 Mercury (Hg) EPA Method 29 Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid

late review of test report shows that not all 5 fractions were analyzed; removed from floor 

analysis but is still in baseline analysis given time constraints

MINeenahPaperMI Boiler 1 Sample #2 8/2/2006 Mercury (Hg) EPA Method 29 Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid

late review of test report shows that not all 5 fractions were analyzed; removed from floor 

analysis but is still in baseline analysis given time constraints

MINeenahPaperMI Boiler 1 Sample #3 8/2/2006 Mercury (Hg) EPA Method 29 Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid

late review of test report shows that not all 5 fractions were analyzed; removed from floor 

analysis but is still in baseline analysis given time constraints

MITBSimonPowerPlant Unit 1 Sample #1 6/14/2007 Mercury (Hg) Method 29

Fabric Filter/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid

Late review of test report showed incorrect use of ND data, values have been updated. 

Updated values used in floor analysis but not in baseline analysis given time constraints

MITBSimonPowerPlant Unit 1 Sample #2 6/14/2007 Mercury (Hg) Method 29

Fabric Filter/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid

Late review of test report showed incorrect use of ND data, values have been updated. 

Updated values used in floor analysis but not in baseline analysis given time constraints

MITBSimonPowerPlant Unit 1 Sample #3 6/14/2007 Mercury (Hg) Method 29

Fabric Filter/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid

Late review of test report showed incorrect use of ND data, values have been updated. 

Updated values used in floor analysis but not in baseline analysis given time constraints

MITBSimonPowerPlant Unit 1 Sample #1 6/13/2007 Mercury (Hg) Method 29

Fabric Filter/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid

8/24/11 - Review of test report showed Hg fractions were treated improperly--recalculated 

values amended in database; late review of test report showed that previously-updated values 

were also incorrect; updated values added. Updated values used

MITBSimonPowerPlant Unit 1 Sample #2 6/13/2007 Mercury (Hg) Method 29

Fabric Filter/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid

8/24/11 - Review of test report showed Hg fractions were treated improperly--recalculated 

values amended in database; late review of test report showed that previously-updated values 

were also incorrect; updated values added. Updated values used

MITBSimonPowerPlant Unit 1 Sample #3 6/15/2007 Mercury (Hg) Method 29

Fabric Filter/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR) /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid

8/24/11 - Review of test report showed Hg fractions were treated improperly--recalculated 

values amended in database; late review of test report showed that previously-updated values 

were also incorrect; updated values added. Updated values used

Page 1 of 3
Appendix F-2: Summary of Findings from Late Test Report Review for Mercury Top Performers

Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Pollutant Test Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

90% Fuel 

Category Note For Changes Made

MNDESPHansONyman EU007 Sample #1 3/7/2007 Mercury (Hg) EPA Method 29

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic 

Precipitator/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Natural gas/Wood: Unadulterated 

Timber/ Solid

Late review of test report showed that not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Removed from floor 

analysis but still in baseline analysis given time constraints

MNDESPHansONyman EU007 Sample #2 3/7/2007 Mercury (Hg) EPA Method 29

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic 

Precipitator/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Natural gas/Wood: Unadulterated 

Timber/ Solid

Late review of test report showed that not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Removed from floor 

analysis but still in baseline analysis given time constraints

MNDESPHansONyman EU007 Sample #3 3/7/2007 Mercury (Hg) EPA Method 29

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic 

Precipitator/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Natural gas/Wood: Unadulterated 

Timber/ Solid

Late review of test report showed that not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Removed from floor 

analysis but still in baseline analysis given time constraints

MNDESPHansONyman EU007 Sample #1 3/6/2007 Mercury (Hg) EPA Method 29

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic 

Precipitator/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Natural gas/Wood: Unadulterated 

Timber/ Solid

Late review of test report showed that not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Removed from floor 

analysis but still in baseline analysis given time constraints

MNDESPHansONyman EU007 Sample #2 3/6/2007 Mercury (Hg) EPA Method 29

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic 

Precipitator/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Natural gas/Wood: Unadulterated 

Timber/ Solid

Late review of test report showed that not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Removed from floor 

analysis but still in baseline analysis given time constraints

MNDESPHansONyman EU007 Sample #3 3/6/2007 Mercury (Hg) EPA Method 29

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic 

Precipitator/Selective Non-Catalytic 

Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) 

(SNCR)

/Natural gas/Wood: Unadulterated 

Timber/ Solid

Late review of test report showed that not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Removed from floor 

analysis but still in baseline analysis given time constraints

NCGPRoxboro ES-1 Wood fired Boiler Sample #1 7/14/2004 Mercury (Hg) EPA method 29 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone) /Wood: Unadulterated Lumber/ Solid

Late review of test report showed that not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Removed from floor 

analysis but still in baseline analysis given time constraints.

NCGPRoxboro ES-1 Wood fired Boiler Sample #2 7/14/2004 Mercury (Hg) EPA method 29 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone) /Wood: Unadulterated Lumber/ Solid

Late review of test report showed that not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Removed from floor 

analysis but still in baseline analysis given time constraints.

NCGPRoxboro ES-1 Wood fired Boiler Sample #3 7/14/2004 Mercury (Hg) EPA method 29 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone) /Wood: Unadulterated Lumber/ Solid

Late review of test report showed that not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Removed from floor 

analysis but still in baseline analysis given time constraints.

OHAppletonIdeas Boiler 4 (B003) Sample #1 1/31/2003 Mercury (Hg)

USEPA Reference 

Method 29

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic 

Precipitator /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid

Late review of test report showed that not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Removed from floor 

analysis but still in baseline analysis given time constraints.

OHAppletonIdeas Boiler 4 (B003) Sample #2 1/31/2003 Mercury (Hg)

USEPA Reference 

Method 29

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic 

Precipitator /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid

Late review of test report showed that not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Removed from floor 

analysis but still in baseline analysis given time constraints.

OHAppletonIdeas Boiler 4 (B003) Sample #3 1/31/2003 Mercury (Hg)

USEPA Reference 

Method 29

Cyclone: Multiple 

(Multiclone)/Electrostatic 

Precipitator /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid

Late review of test report showed that not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Removed from floor 

analysis but still in baseline analysis given time constraints.

OKGPMuskogeeMill B-3 Sample #1 5/20/2003 Mercury (Hg)

Ontario Hydro Method 

13 Fabric Filter /Coal: Sub-bituminous/ Solid

Late review of test report showed that not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Removed from floor 

analysis but still in baseline analysis given time constraints.

OKGPMuskogeeMill B-3 Sample #2 5/20/2003 Mercury (Hg)

Ontario Hydro Method 

13 Fabric Filter /Coal: Sub-bituminous/ Solid

Late review of test report showed that not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Removed from floor 

analysis but still in baseline analysis given time constraints.

OKGPMuskogeeMill B-3 Sample #3 5/20/2003 Mercury (Hg)

Ontario Hydro Method 

13 Fabric Filter /Coal: Sub-bituminous/ Solid

Late review of test report showed that not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Removed from floor 

analysis but still in baseline analysis given time constraints.

VADukeEnergyNarrows Boiler #2 Sample #1 4/15/2004 Mercury (Hg) Method 29 Electrostatic Precipitator /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid

Late review of test report shows that non-detect portions were incorrectly treated as zero; 

corrected values entered. Updated values used in floor analysis but old values used in baseline 

analysis given time constraints. Test date also updated.

VADukeEnergyNarrows Boiler #2 Sample #2 4/15/2004 Mercury (Hg) Method 29 Electrostatic Precipitator /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid

Late review of test report shows that non-detect portions were incorrectly treated as zero; 

corrected values entered. Updated values used in floor analysis but old values used in baseline 

analysis given time constraints. Test date also updated.

VADukeEnergyNarrows Boiler #2 Sample #3 4/15/2004 Mercury (Hg) Method 29 Electrostatic Precipitator /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid

Late review of test report shows that non-detect portions were incorrectly treated as zero; 

corrected values entered. Updated values used in floor analysis but old values used in baseline 

analysis given time constraints. Test date also updated.

WIGPGreenBay2818 B29 - Fluidized Bed Boiler #9 Sample #1 10/27/1992 Mercury (Hg) EPA Method 29

Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric 

Filter /Petroleum Coke/ Solid

6/28/10 - Facility submitted fuel corrections for the unit, which burns pet coke and not coke 

oven gas; Late review of test report showed that not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Removed 

from floor analysis but still in baseline analysis given ti

WIGPGreenBay2818 B29 - Fluidized Bed Boiler #9 Sample #2 10/27/1992 Mercury (Hg) EPA Method 29

Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric 

Filter /Petroleum Coke/ Solid

6/28/10 - Facility submitted fuel corrections for the unit, which burns pet coke and not coke 

oven gas; Late review of test report showed that not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Removed 

from floor analysis but still in baseline analysis given ti

Page 2 of 3
Appendix F-2: Summary of Findings from Late Test Report Review for Mercury Top Performers

Facility ID Unit ID Sample ID Test Date Pollutant Test Method Cleaned Control Device Fuel

90% Fuel 

Category Note For Changes Made

WIGPGreenBay2818 B29 - Fluidized Bed Boiler #9 Sample #3 10/27/1992 Mercury (Hg) EPA Method 29

Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric 

Filter /Petroleum Coke/ Solid

6/28/10 - Facility submitted fuel corrections for the unit, which burns pet coke and not coke 

oven gas; Late review of test report showed that not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Removed 

from floor analysis but still in baseline analysis given ti

Page 3 of 3