alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
J. Randolph Babbitt ZOIO NOV 18 P 2- 02 

Administrator 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 

RE: Concerns with FAA's NPRM on Flight Time/Duty Time 

Dear Administrator Babbitt: 

As a member of the flying public, 1 have serious concerns about the FAA's proposed new Flight 

Time/Duty Time requirements. While I appreciate the FAA's attempts to make public safety a 

top priority, I don't believe that the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) goes far enough to 

effectively address pilot fatigue. 

As you know, the current NPRM includes a significant increase in the number of pilots' flight 

hours and does not ensure adequate rest periods. I strongly disagree with these provisions. It is 

imperative that all crewmembers receive a minimum of eight hours of sleep per night - they are 

no different than the rest of us. In their douTi time, pilots need to get a bite to eat, exercise, call 

home to their loved ones, get ready for bed, and still have enough time to get a full night's sleep. 

The proposed nine hours of rest doesn't allow sufficient time for pilots to take care of themselves 

and still get enough sleep to do their jobs to the best of their abilities. 

Note that as a Boeing engineer involved with flight test new airplanes, I can tell you Boeing 

requires all engineers, pilots, and technicians to have no less than 12 hours of "crew rest" before 

a test flight. 

On top of decreasing the amount of rest a pilot can get, the NPRM is also proposing to increase 

flight time by 25%. I know from experience that putting in a long day at work is exhausting -

and it is common sense that increasing the number of hours a pilot spends in the cockpit will 

increase fatigue. Ten hours of in-flight time is simply too much. As a frequent traveler, it is 

critical to me that every pilot on every flight is well-rested and well-prepared for our trip. The 

NPRM as currently written decreases my level of confidence that this will be the case. 

This proposed rule is critically important not only to airline employees, but also to the flying 

public - people like me. We need to err on the side of caution and make sure that the rules we 

establish encourage our pilots to get the rest they need to make sure every flight is a safe one. I 

encourage you and the FAA to revisit these rules to add more rest time and not increase flight 

time. We can't afford to make a mistake with these rules - too many lives depend on getting it 

right. 

Thank you for your time. 

Thomas Erchul 
201 Mountain Park Blvd SW C203 

Issaquah, WA 98027
#### The First Sterling National Bank of Sterling, by Fred Salm, receiver, appellant, v. Gerhard Behrens et al., appellees.

Gen. No. 8,864.

Opinion filed November 15, 1934.

Rehearing denied February 5, 1935.

John M. Stager, for appellant. Chas. H. Woodburn and H. J. Folkers, for appellees.

Mr. Justice Huffman

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### § 3560.206 Conversion to Plan II (Interest Credit).

The Agency encourages any borrower not on Plan II to convert to Plan II to provide more favorable rent costs to very-low, low, and moderate-income households.
#### § 29.2530 Leaf structure.

The cell development of a leaf as indicated by its porosity. (See chart, § 29.2601.)

[37 FR 13626, July 12, 1972. Redesignated at 49 FR 16757, Apr. 20, 1984]
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report onForm 10-QSB in accordance with Rule 15(d)-2 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 of Advanced BioEnergy, LLC (the “Company”) for theperiod ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Revis L. Stephenson, III,President and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   |  /s/  Revis L. Stephenson, III                                  |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Revis L. Stephenson, III, Chairman and  Principal Executive  Officer |
|   |                                                                      |
|   | Dated:                                                                    |   | 2/14/06 |   |
|        |                                                                           |        |  |  |  |

 

----
j4910-13-P)

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTA nON

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR ParI 39

IDocket No. FAA-2009-0637; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-183-AD; Amendme

,,.;6:> 1... rt\

39-*****; AD 2009-**-**}

RIN 2120-AA64

Airwor"thiness Directives; Construcciones Aeronauricas, 5.A. (CASA), Model CN~23

CN-235~ 100. CN-235-200. and CN-235-300 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Dcpanment ofTransportatioll

(DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY: We are superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD) for the

products listed above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness

infomlation (MeAl) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify

and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product.

condition as:

* * '"[C]racks [were originally] detected on some CN-235 aircraft in flap

fittings PIN 35-15501-0101, -0 I02, -0201 and -0202, attaching the

structure of the outer flaps to their rear SUppOitsand, in the adjacent

structure. DGAC Spain issued AD Nr. 0 I197[.J * * *

Since AD l!97 Rev.I was published, similar cracks have been detected in

naps longerons. * * *

"'''"' .."-" .•."

~(;S"'BOI

II[r D·i21st

'TYR:;d ,A" tv

S

IlMI'

/0 z;jOq

,-""" "MlI(>l

11(" -i'. 8

rr •

1(. ~

"~oI23/D~

"All

* * * *

,

*

Fatigue cracking of the rear internal support fittings and longerons of the outer Oap
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.4f


                                 SIXTH AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                            STERLING CHEMICALS, INC.
              AMENDED AND RESTATED SALARIED EMPLOYEES' PENSION PLAN


                  WHEREAS, there is reserved to Sterling Chemicals, Inc. (the
"Company") in Section 15.1 of the Sterling Chemicals, Inc. Amended and Restated
Salaried Employees' Pension Plan (the "Plan") the right to amend the Plan;

                  NOW, THEREFORE, Section 2.1 of the Plan is hereby amended by
adding thereto the following:

                  For all purposes of this Plan, an employee of an Employer who
                  is a member of a collective bargaining unit shall not be an
                  eligible employee unless the bargaining agreement with the
                  Employer provides for his coverage.

                  All terms used herein that are defined in the Plan shall have
the same meanings given to such terms in the Plan, except as otherwise expressly
provided herein.

                  Except as amended and modified hereby, the Plan shall continue
in full force and effect and the Plan and this amendment shall be read, taken
and construed as one and the same instrument.

                  This amendment may be executed in several counterparts, each
of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which shall constitute but one
and the same instrument which may be evidenced by any one counterpart.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed this instrument
this _______________, 1999.




                                    STERLING CHEMICALS, INC.


                                    By:
                                       ---------------------
                                    Name:
                                         -------------------
                                    Title:
                                          ------------------
98-1901.

#### Jordan v. Mohr.

In Habeas Corpus. *Sua sponte,*cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:89-cr-01007-MP

JACQUE EMOND,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 749, First Motion to Dismiss Filed by Plaintiff

USA as to Jacque Emond. The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has been unable to

locate this defendant in the past twenty years and he is believed to be outside the United States.

The DEA has further advised that if defendant Jacque Emond were to be apprehended, there is

insufficient evidence, due to the age of the case and unavailability of witnesses, to proceed to

trial. Based upon the DEA’s representations, Government counsel has concluded that there is no

reasonable likelihood of a successful prosecution on the merits, and requests that the charges

against this defendant be dismissed. The Court agrees, and it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED.

2. The Indictment is DISMISSED against the above named defendant.

DONE AND ORDERED this 5th day of January, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
**Exhibit32**

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Stone Arcade Acquisition Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Roger Stone,Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive and Financial Officer) of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant tosection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of myknowledge:

(1)           The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and result of operations of the Company for the period certified.

Pursuant to the rulesand regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, this certificationis being furnished and is not deemed filed.

Signed on this 13th dayof November, 2006.
|        | /s/ Roger Stone |   |
|--------|-----------------|--------|
|   | Roger Stone     |

 

----
- 440 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 305 Nebraska Reports

REVEIZ v . EL-KASABY Cite as 305 Neb. 440

Elena Reveiz, appellant, v. Bassel El-Kasaby, appellee. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed April 3, 2020. No. S-19-278. Appeal from the District Court for Douglas County: J Russell Derr , Judge. Affirmed. Denise E. Frost, of Johnson & Mock, P.C., L.L.O., for appellant. Cathy S. Trent-Vilim, and, on brief, Stacy L. Morris and Kate Geyer Johnson, of Lamson, Dugan & Murray, L.L.P., for appellee.
Heavican , C.J., Miller

- Lerman , Cassel , Stacy, Funke , and Freudenberg , JJ. Per Curiam

. The February 19, 2019, order of the Douglas County District Court is affirmed by an equally divided court. Affirmed. Papik , J., not participating. Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 06/12/2020 08:08 AM CDT
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Linn Energy, LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark E. Ellis, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










Date: April 29, 2010

/s/  Mark E. EllisMark E. EllisPresident and Chief Executive Officer
#### Marilyn Bryant, Respondent, v New York City Transit Authority et al., Appellants, and City of New York et al., Respondents.

[816 NYS2d 513]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants New York City Transit Authority and “John Doe” appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Partnow, J.), dated July 14, 2004, as denied their cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

On October 24, 2000, the plaintiff allegedly fell into a pothole and was injured as she stepped off a bus owned and operated by the defendant New York City Transit Authority and driven by the defendant “John Doe” (hereinafter collectively referred to as the TA). The duty of a common carrier “to an alighting passenger [is] to stop at a place where the passenger may safely disembark and leave the area” *(Miller v Fernan,*73 NY2d 844, 846 [1988]; *see Diedrick v City of New York,*162 AD2d 496, 496-497 [1990]). The plaintiff contends that the TA breached its duty because, upon exiting the bus, she was caused to step down into a pothole.

The Supreme Court properly denied the TA’s motion for summary judgment because it failed to tender evidence sufficient to entitle it to judgment as a matter of law *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). Questions of fact exist as to whether the TA breached its duty to the plaintiff under the circumstances of this case *(see Conetta v New York City Tr. Auth.,*307 AD2d 333 [2003]). Schmidt, J.P., Crane, Spolzino and Covello, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
32.2



CERTIFICATION
FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



This
certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and accompanies the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Form 10-Q”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2020 of NanoVibronix, Inc. (the “Company”).
I, James Cardwell, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that, based on my knowledge:



(1)
The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)
The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company as of and for the periods covered in this report.



|Date:
    August 19, 2020 | By: | /s/
    James Cardwell                          
|------------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------------
|                          |     | James
    Cardwell                              
|                          |     | Chief
    Financial Officer                     
|                          |     | (Principal
    Financial and Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT 23.1 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT


We consent to the use of our report dated February 20, 2004, except for Note 15 as to which the date is March 22, 2004 ("Report"), in the 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of ANTS software inc. (the "Company") and we further consent to the incorporation by reference of our Report in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-46766, No. 333-62206 and No. 333-105507) of the Company.


Date: March 30, 2004

/s/ Burr, Pilger & Mayer, LLP_________________________Burr, Pilger & Mayer, LLP
#### The People of the State of Illinois ex rel. John S. Rusch, defendant in error, v. Alex Rivlin et al., respondents. Lina Singer, plaintiff in error.

Gen. No. 37,271.

Opinion filed October 16, 1934.

Rehearing denied October 29, 1934.

Simon Herr and Martin 0. Weisbrod, for plaintiff in error; Michael A. Romano, of counsel. Thomas J. Courtney, State’s Attorney, for defendant in error; John F. Cashen, Jr., of counsel.

Mr. Justice Scanlan

delivered the opinion of the court.
1.707 Signatory authority.

When a D&F is required, it shall be signed by the appropriate official in accordance with agency

regulations. Authority to sign or delegate signature authority for the various D&F’s is as shown in

the applicable FAR part.

Parent topic: Subpart 1.7 - Determinations and Findings
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2584 

To require institutions of higher education to provide students with information from the Occupational Employment Statistics program and the 

Occupational Outlook Handbook of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 28, 2013 

Mr. CARSON of Indiana introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To require institutions of higher education to provide students with information from the Occupational Employment Statistics program and the Occupational Outlook 

Handbook of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Higher Education and 

5 Employment Transparency Act’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2584 IH

1 SEC. 2. OCCUPATIONAL EMPLOYMENT STATISTICS. 

2 (a) REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SECRETARY OF EDU3 CATION.—Section 132(i)(1) of the Higher Education Act 

4 of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1015a(i)(1)) is amended— 

5 (1) in subparagraph (V), by adding at the end 

6 the following new clause: 

7 ‘‘(iv) Placement information required 

8 to be provided by the institution under sec9 tion 485(a)(R), as amended by the Higher 

10 Education and Employment Transparency 

11 Act, with respect to graduates of the insti12 tution’s degree or certificate programs.’’; 

13 and 

14 (2) in subparagraph (W), by inserting before 

15 the period at the end the following: ‘‘and a link to 

16 the appropriate section of such website that provides 

17 information from the Occupational Employment Sta18 tistics program and the Occupational Outlook Hand19 book of the Bureau of Labor Statistics’’. 

20 (b) REQUIREMENTS FOR INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER

21 EDUCATION.— 

22 (1) INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL ASSIST23 ANCE INFORMATION FOR STUDENTS.—Section 

24 485(a)(R) of such Act (20 U.S.C. 1092(a)(R)) is 

25 amended by inserting after ‘‘, certificate programs,’’ 

26 the following: ‘‘including whether such employment 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2584 IH

1 is paid or unpaid and whether such employment re2 quires any postsecondary education’’. 

3 (2) PROGRAM PARTICIPATION AGREEMENTS.— 

4 Section 487(a) of such Act (20 U.S.C. 1094(a)) is 

5 amended by adding at the end the following new 

6 paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(30) The institution will provide a link promi8 nently, and near any institutional statistics (such as 

9 job placement rates), on the institution’s website to 

10 the appropriate section of the Bureau of Labor Sta11 tistics website that provides information from the 

12 Occupational Employment Statistics program and 

13 the Occupational Outlook Handbook of the Bureau 

14 of Labor Statistics.’’. 

15 (3) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made 

16 by paragraphs (1) and (2) shall be effective for aca17 demic year 2013–2014 and succeeding academic 

18 years. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Case 3:99-cr-00004-LC   Document 51   Filed 11/16/07   Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Alliance Financial Corporation (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, J. Daniel Mohr, Treasurer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: March 13, 2008



/s/ J. Daniel MohrName: J. Daniel MohrTitle: Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer




A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.