alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CI2021161EN.01000101.xml

| 3.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 161/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 161/1

---

Statement by the Commission relating to Regulation (EU) 2021/691 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers (EGF) and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1309/2013

(2021/C 161 I/01)

In the Inter-institutional Agreement between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline, on cooperation in budgetary matters and on sound financial management, as well as on new own resources, including a roadmap for the introduction of new own resources, Points 30 to 33 require the Commission to make available an integrated and interoperable information and monitoring system including a single data-mining and risk-scoring tool to access and analyse the required data with a view to a generalised application by Member States. In addition, the three institutions agreed to sincerely cooperate, in the course of the legislative procedure relating to the relevant basic acts, to ensure the follow up to the European Council conclusions of July 2020 regarding this element.

The Commission considers that the agreement reached by the co-legislators under Article 23(2) on the obligatory use of a single data-mining tool and the collection and analysis of data on the beneficial owners of the recipients of funding is not sufficient to enhance the protection of the Union budget and NextGenerationEU against fraud and irregularities and to ensure efficient checks on conflicts of interests, irregularities, issues of double funding, and criminal misuse of the funds. Therefore, the approach agreed by the co-legislators in the Regulation European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers does not appropriately reflect the desired ambition and spirit of the Inter-institutional Agreement.

---
§ 3430.1204 Project types and priorities. ( a ) *Education, Extension, and Training.* The purpose of the proposed activities must be to substantially relieve rural veterinarian shortage situations, or facilitate or support veterinary practices engaged in public health activities, in the U.S.
( b ) *Rural practice enhancement.* The purpose will be to support the development and provision of veterinary services to substantially relieve designated rural veterinarian shortage situations in the U.S. Funds may be used to establish or expand veterinary practices, including: ( 1 ) Equipping veterinary offices;
( 2 ) Sharing in the reasonable overhead costs of such veterinary practices, as determined by the Secretary; or
( 3 ) Establishing mobile veterinary facilities in which a portion of the facilities will address education or extension needs.
§ 3560.304 Initial operating capital. ( a ) *Purpose.* To provide a source of capital for start-up costs, such as the purchase of equipment, and paying operating, maintenance, and debt service expenses. Borrowers are required to make an initial operating capital contribution to the general operating account as described in § 3560.64.
( b ) *Authorized uses of initial operating capital.* Initial operating capital may be used only to pay for approved budgeted expenses.
( c ) *Withdrawal of initial operating capital.* Initial operating capital funds may be withdrawn by a borrower if: ( 1 ) The initial operating capital was provided from the borrower's own funds;
( 2 ) The borrower requests the withdrawal after the second year of housing project operations and prior to the 7th year of operations;
( 3 ) The housing project has had a 90 percent occupancy rate for a period of 12 months prior to the withdrawal request;
( 4 ) The withdrawal will not affect the financial viability of the housing project;
( 5 ) Contributions to the reserve account are at authorized levels;
( 6 ) The withdrawal request will not result in rent increases; and
( 7 ) There are no outstanding deficiencies in management's physical maintenance of the housing project.
Case 3:20-cr-00036-MCR Document 35 Filed 10/22/20 Page 1 of 7
Case 3:20-cr-00036-MCR Document 35 Filed 10/22/20 Page 2 of 7
Case 3:20-cr-00036-MCR Document 35 Filed 10/22/20 Page 3 of 7
Case 3:20-cr-00036-MCR Document 35 Filed 10/22/20 Page 4 of 7
Case 3:20-cr-00036-MCR Document 35 Filed 10/22/20 Page 5 of 7
Case 3:20-cr-00036-MCR Document 35 Filed 10/22/20 Page 6 of 7
Case 3:20-cr-00036-MCR Document 35 Filed 10/22/20 Page 7 of 7
###### Editorial Note on Part 3406

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3406 appear at 76 FR 4809, Jan. 27, 2011.

#### § 3406.10 Use of funds for facilities.

Under the 1890 Institution Capacity Building Grants Program, the use of grant funds to plan, acquire, or construct a building or facility is not allowed. With prior approval, in accordance with the cost principles set forth in 2 CFR part 200, some grant funds may be used for minor alterations, renovations, or repairs deemed necessary to retrofit existing teaching or research spaces in order to carry out a funded project. However, requests to use grant funds for such purposes must demonstrate that the alterations, renovations, or repairs are incidental to the major purpose for which a grant is made.

[62 FR 39331, July 22, 1997, as amended at 79 FR 75999, Dec. 19, 2014]
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS

*June 8, 2006*

[Cite as *06/08/2006 Case Announcements,*2006-Ohio-2868.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2005- 2436.

#### State v. Trimble.

Portage C.P. No. 2005CR0022. This cause is pending before the court as a death penalty appeal from the Portage County Court of Common Pleas. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for an extension of time to transmit the record,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the record shall be transmitted to the Clerk of this court forthwith.
Sr. 4 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX k Pno 0 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105-3901 

## JUN 182014
Edie Chang. Deputy Executive Officer CaliforniaAirResources Board Post Office Box 2815 Sacrament

, CA 95812 DearM

. lang: On May 13, 2014, CARB submittedrevisions to the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). We have reviewed materials submittedwiththe following rules and foundthatthey fulfill the completeness criteriain 40 CFR Part 51, Appendix V. APCD/AQMD Rule # Rule Title Emissions ofOxides ofNitrogen from Industrial, South Coast 1 146 Institutional, and Commercial Boilers, Steam Generators. and Process Heaters Emissions ofOxides ofNitrogen from Small Industrial. South Coast 1146.1 Institutional, and Commercial Boilers, Steam Generators. and Process Heaters We intend to address the otherproposed SIP revisions in CARB’s May 13, 2014 submittal separately. In tile coming months we will review the complete revisions for actionpursuant to Clean AirAct section 110(k). Questions regarding our completeness review should be directed to Arnold Lazarus at (415) 972-3024. Sincerely,
DebahJorda1l Director. AirDivi ion

cc: Sentby e-mail Dr. Barry Wallerstein, Executive Officer, South Coast AQMD I’vlr. rvlichael Giizetta. Ivianager, Rule Evaluation Section. CARB

P,i,iied vii Reci’Ied Pvpe,
Editorial Note on Subchapter C of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter C appear by Amdt. 381, 65 FR 64586, Oct. 30, 2000.

§ 292.7 Period to establish eligibility. ( a ) Eligibility for Summer EBT, as determined through an application or by streamlined certification, may be established from the first day of the instructional year immediately preceding the summer operational period through the last day of the summer operational period, as defined by the Summer EBT agency in the Plan for Operations and Management (POM).
( b ) Households are not required to report changes in circumstances during the instructional year or summer operational period, but a household may voluntarily contact the State or LEA to report any changes in income, household composition, or program participation.
( c ) The carryover period in the school meal programs, as required at § 245.6(c)(1) of this chapter, may not be used to confer eligibility for Summer EBT benefits during the summer operational period following the instructional year in which the carryover benefit was provided as it is outside of the period to establish eligibility, as described in paragraph (a) of this section.
#### § 210.34 Seamless Summer Option non-congregate meal service.

A school food authority operating the Seamless Summer Option in a rural area may be approved to offer a non-congregate meal service consistent with that established in part 225 of this chapter. Such school food authorities must comply with the non-congregate meal service provisions set forth at § 225.16(b)(5)(i) and (iv) of this chapter and may use the non-congregate meal service options contained in § 225.16(i) of this chapter.

[88 FR 90347, Dec. 29, 2023]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 23, 2013

h1216

Order 

Clerk

December 23, 2013

147919

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147919

COA: 314162

Emmett CC: 12-003615-FH

ANTHONY DEAN LANE, 12-003617-FH

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 26, 2013 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jerry Pitts, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant has pleaded guilty to attempted rape, first degree, in full satisfaction of *720three indictments containing multiple counts. At the time of the plea, counsel stated on the record that the plea was based on representations of the court and the prosecutor that the sentence would be 0 to 5 years and would run concurrently with an undischarged term defendant was serving in the Erie County Penitentiary. The court accepted counsel’s statement and asked the defendant if that was his understanding of the plea bargain. At the time of sentencing the court imposed a 0- to 5-year term, but in an ambiguous comment refused counsel’s request to specify that the term was concurrent. It did not direct, however, that the sentence was to be consecutive with the existing undischarged term. Accordingly, the sentences are to run concurrently by operation of law (Penal Law, § 70.25, subd 1). (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court—attempted rape, first degree.) Present —Simons, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Doerr and Moule, JJ.
#### Michele Varley, an Infant, by Her Father and Natural Guardian, Michael Varley, et al., Appellants, v Michael Clarke et al., Respondents.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered January 4, 1980, which was in favor of defendants upon the trial court’s dismissal of the complaint at the close of the evidence, at a jury trial. Judgment reversed, on the law, and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. This record presented an issue of fact which should have been determined by the jury. Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Martuscello and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit3.2**

AMENDMENT  NO. 5TO THELIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY OPERATING AGREEMENTOFTWC HOLDING LLC

This Amendment No.5 (this “Amendment”) to the Limited Liability Company OperatingAgreement of TWC Holding LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Company”),is entered into and shall be effective as of May 1, 2006, by and between TheVeritas Capital Fund II, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“Veritas”),and the Person listed as Relinquishing Class B Member on the signature pagehereof (the “Relinquishing Class B Member”).

WHEREAS, theCompany was formed pursuant to that certain Limited Liability Company OperatingAgreement dated as of June 30, 2004 among Veritas and certain named employeesof the Wornick Group, as amended by (i) Amendment No. 1 to the LimitedLiability Company Operating Agreement, dated as of August 18, 2004, amongVeritas and the Members named therein, (ii) Amendment No. 2 to the LimitedLiability Company Operating Agreement, dated as of April 11, 2005, amongVeritas and the Members named therein, (iii) Amendment No. 3 to the LimitedLiability Company Operating Agreement, dated as of November 11, 2005, amongVeritas and the Members named therein, and (iv) Amendment No. 4 to the LimitedLiability Company Operating Agreement, dated as of March 31, 2006, betweenVeritas and the Member named therein (collectively, the “Operating Agreement”);and

WHEREAS, Veritasand the Relinquishing Class B Member desire to amend the Operating Agreement toreflect the elimination of the Class B Membership Interest of the RelinquishingClass B Member;

NOW, THEREFORE, inconsideration of the mutual agreements made herein, Veritas and theRelinquishing Class B Member hereby agree to amend the Operating Agreement asfollows:

1.  Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalizedterms shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Operating Agreement.

2.  Effective as of the date of this Amendment,the Relinquishing Class B Member hereby voluntary relinquishes his entire ClassB Membership Interest for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of whichis hereby acknowledged by the Relinquishing Member.

3.  This Amendment may be executed in severalcounterparts, and all counterparts so executed shall constitute one agreement,binding on all of the parties hereto, notwithstanding that all of the partiesare not signatory to the original or same counterpart.

----

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of Veritas and theRelinquishing Member has executed this Amendment as of the date first abovewritten.
|        | THE VERITAS CAPITAL FUND II, L.P. |
|--------|-----------------------------------|
|   |                              |
|   |                              |
|   | By:                               | /s/ Robert McKeon |
|   |                              | Authorized Signatory |
|   |                              |
|   |                              |
|   | RELINQUISHING CLASS B MEMBER:     |
|   |                              |
|   |                              |
|   | By:                               | /s/ Jon Greisler |
|   |                              | Jon Geisler |

 

2

----
EXHIBIT  32


                    Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
                            18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BlackRock Kelso Capital
Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ending June 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), James
R. Maher, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Frank D. Gordon, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to
ss.18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
         or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.



/s/ James R. Maher
-------------------
Name:  James R. Maher
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:  August 11, 2006


/s/ Frank D. Gordon
--------------------
Name:  Frank D. Gordon
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date:  August 11, 2006


This certification accompanies the report pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
ss.18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this certification required by ss.906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
32.1 
  CERTIFICATION
 PURSUANT
TO
 SECTION
1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE
  I, Uwe Eberle, the President, Chief
Executive Officer and principal executive officer of Man Investments (USA)
Corp., the Managing Member of Man-AHL 130, LLC (“Man-AHL 130”), certify that (i)
the Quarterly Report of Man-AHL 130 on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30,
2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Man-AHL 130.
  Date 
      August 14,
      2008
                
                /s/ Uwe
      EberleUwe
      EberlePresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
§ 301.87-3 Regulated areas. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the Deputy Administrator will list as a regulated area each State or portion of a State in which a sugarcane disease has been found by an inspector, or in which the Deputy Administrator has reason to believe a sugarcane disease is present, or that the Deputy Administrator deems necessary to regulate based on its proximity to a sugarcane disease or its inseparability for enforcement purposes from localities where a sugarcane disease occurs. The Deputy Administrator will publish a list of all regulated areas (the regulated areas list) on the PPQ website at *www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/planthealth/plant-pest-and-disease-programs/pests-and-diseases/plant-disease/sugarcane*. The list will include the date that the list was last updated. Lists of all quarantined areas may also be obtained by request from any local PPQ office; local offices are listed in telephone directors and on the internet at *www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/planthealth/ppq-program-overview/sphd*. After a change is made to the list of regulated areas, APHIS will publish a notice in the Federal Register informing the public that the change has occurred and describing the change to regulated areas. Less than an entire State will be designated as a regulated area only if the Administrator determines that: ( 1 ) The State has adopted and is enforcing restrictions on the intrastate movement of regulated articles that are substantially the same as those that are imposed by this subpart on the interstate movement of regulated articles; and
( 2 ) The designation of less than the entire State as a regulated area will be adequate to prevent the artificial interstate spread of a sugarcane disease.
( b ) The Deputy Administrator or an inspector may temporarily designate any nonregulated area as a regulated area in accordance with the criteria specified in paragraph (a) of this section for listing such an area. Written notice of the designation will be given to the owner or person in possession of the nonregulated area. Thereafter, the interstate movement of any regulated article from the area will be subject to this subpart. As soon as practicable, the area will either be added to the regulated areas list, or the Deputy Administrator or an inspector will terminate the designation. Notice thereof will be given the owner or person in possession of the area.
[87 FR 80015, Dec. 29, 2022]
|Exhibit 32.1
|------------



|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|---------------------------------------------------------------------



|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|---------------------------------------------



|In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hemis Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSBfor the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission 
(the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley 
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|  

|Dated: November 14, 2007 | /s/ Norman Meier                  
|------------------------ | ----------------------------------
|                         | Norman Meier                      
|                         | President, Chief Executive Officer

---
#### § 29.9239 When application may be withdrawn.

An application may be withdrawn at any time before the requested service is rendered. Payment of expenses incurred in connection therewith shall be paid by the applicant as provided in § 29.124 and subpart B of this part.
#### § 3560.502 Tenant notifications and assistance.

Each tenant in an REO property designated to be sold as a non-program property will be notified by the Agency, in writing, of the housing projects' non-program designation and will be given an opportunity to obtain a Letter Of Priority Entitlement (LOPE) as specified in § 3560.159(c).