alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2006-0798.

#### In re S.J.K.

Summit App. No. 22721, 2006-Ohio-653. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed April 3, 2006:

“Whether an assessment of points against a traffic offender’s record qualifies as a ‘collateral disability1 or a ‘loss of civil rights stemming from [the] conviction’ sufficient to demonstrate that the traffic offender continues to have a ‘substantial stake in the judgment of conviction’ even after paying the fines and costs also levied in the judgment of conviction.”

Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

O’Connor, J., not participating.

The conflict cases are *State v. Ingalls,*Stark App. No. 2003CA00311, 2004-Ohio-3441; *Cleveland v. Jennings*(Feb. 17, 2000), Cuyahoga App. No. 76810; *Westlake v. Connole*(Sept. 2, 1999), Cuyahoga App. Nos. 74727 and 74910; *State v. Brown*(Sept. 26,1991), Mahoning App. No. 90 CA 107; and *State v. Simmons*(Dec. 26,1989), Pickaway App. No. 88CA8.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2006-0673, *In re S.J.K.,*Summit App. No. 22721, 2006-Ohio-653.
11/11/2013 10:58 FAX 4356343505 

Todd C. Emerson, #8175 

444 South River Road 

St. George, Utah, 84790 

Telephone: (435) 634-3530 

Facsimile: (435) 634-3505 

PEOPLE 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

In the Matter of: FDMS No. FAA-2013-0292 

FDMS No. FAA-2013-0293 

FDMS No. FAA-2013-0612 

141002 

Sky West Airlines, Inc. RESPONDENT'S REPLY TO NOTICE 

AND REQUEST TO PARTIES 

Judge: Richard C. Goodwin 

To: The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

Respondent's Counsel will be available during the months of January, February and 

March 2014, with the exception of: .January 7, 2014, .January 16,2014, February 18-

February 21, 2014 and March 5, 2014. 

DATED this 11'h day ofNovember, 2013. 

... 

Todd C. Emerson 

Attorney for Sky West Airlines 
11/11/2013 10:58 FAX 4356343505 PEOPLE 141 003 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned hereby certifies that on this 11th day of November, 2013, a true and 

conect copy of the foregoing RESPONDENT'S REPLY TO NOTICE AND REQUEST TO 

PARTIES was served as follows: 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Rm El2-320 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Tel: (202) 366-2139 

Fax: (202) 366-7536 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk; AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building 

Federa+ Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Ave. S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Fax: (202) 493-5142 

Robert Spitzer 

FAA Office of Regional Counsel 

1601 Lind Avenue SW 

Renton, WA 98057 

Tel: (425) 227-2161 

Fax: (425) 227-1007 

2
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SELVIN VILLEDA MONROY, a.k.a.

Selvin Armando Villeda-Monroy,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-73356

Agency No. A099-529-282

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 15, 2012** 

Before: CANBY, GRABER, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Selvin Villeda Monroy, native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum and withholding

FILED

MAY 22 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-73356

of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for

substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Afriyie v. Holder, 613 F.3d 924,

931 (9th Cir. 2010). We grant the petition for review, and we remand.

The agency denied relief on the sole basis that Villeda Monroy failed to

show the government was unwilling or unable to protect him. Substantial evidence

does not support this finding in light of Villeda Monroy’s testimony regarding the

murder of his grandparents, the murder of his father and the subsequent attack on

Villeda Monroy by the same individuals. See id. at 931-32. Accordingly, we

remand for further proceedings consistent with this disposition. See INS v.

Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16-18 (2002) (per curiam).

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.
Unassociated Document









EXHIBIT
10.20

CCC
INFORMATION SERVICES GROUP INC.

MANAGEMENT
INCENTIVE PLAN




PLAN
SUMMARY







The
Management Incentive Plan (“MIP”) is an annual, cash incentive program that
applies to the Company’s non-sales, senior mangers who are in roles that have
clear “line of sight” impact on the financial results of CCC Information
Services Group Inc. (the “Company”). MIP participants who are not members of the
Executive Management Group (“EMG”) have fixed incentive targets ranging from 25%
to 35% of salary, based on salary grade. MIP participants who are members of the
EMG have a fixed incentive target of 50% of salary, except for the Chief
Executive Officer, whose target is 75% of salary. Incentives paid under the MIP
vary based on both Company results and an individual performance multiplier of
0% to 130% of target. Individual performance multipliers will be tied to
achievement versus objectives that are aligned with Company operating plan
goals.




The
Compensation and Nominating Committee of the Board of Directors (the
“Committee”) approves the specific Company performance measures and objectives
for each calendar year on an annual basis. After the end of each calendar year,
performance on each component during such year is evaluated separately and the
aggregate, weighted average performance on all components is calculated to
determine overall MIP funding for such calendar year. Final MIP funding is
subject to approval by the Committee, which typically occurs during the first
quarter of following year, and any incentives by MIP participants are paid
following such approval.
#### The State ex rel. Gibson, Appellant, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Gibson v. Indus. Comm.*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 128.]

(No. 97-469

Submitted July 15, 1998

Decided September 16, 1998.)

*129
      *Law Office of Thomas Tootle*and *Thomas Tootle,*for appellant.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Jonathan A Good,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission.

*Gibson & Robbins-Penniman*and *Kelly A Willis,*for appellee Act-I Temporaries.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Douglas and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Resnick, J., dissents.

Alice Robie Resnick, J.,

dissenting. I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2242 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2242

To establish the policy of the United States with respect to deployment 
 of missile defense systems capable of defending allies of the United 
                States against ballistic missile attack.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 2, 2006

  Mr. Vitter introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To establish the policy of the United States with respect to deployment 
 of missile defense systems capable of defending allies of the United 
                States against ballistic missile attack.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Defense Against Regional Threats Act 
of 2005''.

SEC. 2. ALLIED MISSILE DEFENSE POLICY.

    It is the policy of the United States to provide for deployment as 
soon as is technologically possible of effective missile defense 
systems capable of defending Israel, Japan, the Republic of Korea, 
Taiwan, and all member nations of the North Atlantic Treaty 
Organization against ballistic missile attack.

SEC. 3. ALLIED BURDENSHARING.

    It is the policy of the United States to seek continued negotiated 
burdensharing agreements with the nations specified in section 2 to 
share the costs of development and deployment of ballistic missile 
defense systems.
                                 <all>
```
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. 4:95cr4034-WS

ROBERT JUNIOR CLARK, 4:06cv18-WS

Defendant.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 181)

docketed February 7, 2006. The magistrate judge recommends that the defendant's 

motion, filed on January 5, 2006, be summarily dismissed because authorization for

filing a second or successive motion has not been granted. The defendant has filed

objections (doc. 182) to the report and recommendation.

Upon review of the record in light of the defendant’s objections, the court has

determined that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation must be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 181) is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order of the court.

Case 4:95-cr-04034-WS-CAS Document 183 Filed 02/22/06 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 4:95cr4034-WS

2. The defendant’s motion (doc. 180) is hereby summarily DISMISSED.

3. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and shall close Case No.

4:06cv18-WS.

DONE AND ORDERED this February 22, 2006.

 /s William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:95-cr-04034-WS-CAS Document 183 Filed 02/22/06 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.2



May 8, 2008

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, NE

Washington, DC 20549



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Lazard Group
LLC (the Registrant) hereby certifies that the Registrants quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                            
|----------------------------
|                            
|/s/    Michael J. Castellano
|Michael J. Castellano       
|Chief Financial Officer     



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
January 10, 1974
The Honorable Anna Beth Merten County Auditor Wailer County P. 0. Box 966 Hempstead, Texas 77445 Opinion No. H- 205 Re: Disposition offunds

raised by anon-profit corporation in connection with county centennial Dear Ms. Merten: celebration

Your request for our opinion involves funds derived from the sale of abook onthe history ofWalter County and aWailer County Centennial Cookbook. You advise that the Wailer County Historical Survey Committee, created inaccordance with Article 6145.1, V. T. C.S., has been inactive, in other than civic duties, until this year. Since 1973 was the Wailer County Centennial Year, the Committee decided that itwas an opportune time to write and have published the history ofWailer County and also aWalter County Centennial Cookbook.

Wailer County Historical Society, Inc., anon-profit corporation, was formed and itfinanced the history book and the cookbook for the Historical Survey Committee. After selling the books and paying expenses, a profit remained.

The question you have asked is: “Should the profit from the sale of the above mentioned books be deposited with the Wailer County Treasurer to be disbursed by her and audited by the County Auditor, as other county funds? ”

The Texas Non-Profit Corporation Act, Article 1396-1.01, et s.eq. , V. T.C.S., authorizes the organization ofsuch acorporation for any lawful purpose. (Art. 1396-Z. 01). Among its general powers, itis expressly authorized “To make donations for the public welfare or for charitable, scientific, or educational purposes. . . .” [Art. 1396-2.02, A(l3)]. Itis not prohibited from realizing aprofit but may not pay any dividend t.oits members, directors

p. 964The Honorable Anna Beth Merten, page 2 (H-205)

or officers. (Art. 1396-Z. 24).

Itis our opinion, therefore, that the funds ofthe Wailer County Historical Society, Inc., may be used or disposed of byitfor any purpose not forbidden by the Non-Profit Corporation Act. The corporation is not subject tothe supervision ofthe County Auditor’s office and may deposit its funds in any proper depository or none at all. SUMMARY Neither the county treasurer northe county auditor has any responsibility for funds ofalegally organized non-profit corporation. Very truly yours,

JOHN L. HILL Attorney General of Texas

DAVID M. KENDALL, Chairman Opinion Committee

p. 965
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 223 (Friday, November 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 70955]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29211]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Advisory Committee on the Medical Uses of Isotopes: Meeting 
Notice

AGENCY: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission will convene a 
teleconference meeting of the Advisory Committee on the Medical Uses of 
Isotopes (ACMUI) on December 13, 2010, to discuss: (1) Patient release 
following iodine-131 therapy; (2) rulemaking and implementation 
guidance for physical protection of byproduct material; and (3) the 
impacts of the draft safety culture policy statement for medical 
licensees. A copy of the agenda for the meeting will be available at 
http:[sol][sol]www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acmui/agenda or 
by contacting Ms. Ashley Cockerham using the information below.

DATES: The teleconference meeting will be held on Monday, December 13, 
2010, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.
    Public Participation: Any member of the public who wishes to 
participate in the teleconference discussion should contact Ms. 
Cockerham using the contact information below.
    Contact Information: Ashley M. Cockerham, e-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#600113080c05194e030f030b051208010d200e12034e070f16"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0564766d69607c2b666a666e60776d6468456b77662b626a73">[email protected]</span></a>, telephone: (240) 888-7129.

Conduct of the Meeting

    Leon S. Malmud, M.D., will chair the meeting. Dr. Malmud will 
conduct the meeting in a manner that will facilitate the orderly 
conduct of business. The following procedures apply to public 
participation in the meeting:
    1. Persons who wish to provide a written statement should submit an 
electronic copy to Ms. Cockerham at the contact information listed 
above. All submittals must be received by December 8, 2010, and must 
pertain to the topic on the agenda for the meeting.
    2. Questions and comments from members of the public will be 
permitted during the meeting, at the discretion of the Chairman.
    3. The transcript will be available on the ACMUI's Web site 
(http:[sol][sol] www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/acmui/tr/) on 
or about January 13, 2011. A meeting summary will be available on or 
about January 27, 2011.
    This meeting will be held in accordance with the Atomic Energy Act 
of 1954, as amended (primarily Section 161a); the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App); and the Commission's regulations in Title 
10, U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Part 7.

    Dated: November 15, 2010.
Andrew L. Bates,
Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-29211 Filed 11-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Agatino Zito, Appellant.

Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 16, 1965, reversed, on the law, and application granted to the extent that a hearing is directed to be held on the issues raised in appellant’s application; and matter remanded accordingly to the Supreme Court, Kings County. Findings of fact, if any, have not been considered. In our opinion, defendant has alleged facts which, if established, justify relief by way of *coram nobis.*He is entitled to a hearing *(People*v. *Picciotti,*4 N Y 2d 340; *People*v. *Gallo,*12 N Y 2d 12; *People*v. *Donovan,*13 N Y 2d 148). Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
#### Julie B. Morrison, Petitioner, v Martin Evans et al., Respondents.

— Application, pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously denied, the cross motion granted and the petition dismissed, without costs and without disbursements. The stays, contained in the orders to show cause dated November 10,1979 and November 11,1979, are vacated. No opinion. Concur —Sandler, J. P., Sullivan, Bloom and Silverman, JJ.
Case 3:20-cv-04698-TKW-HTC Document 59 Filed 06/07/21 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                         Advisory Committee for Cyberinfrastructure (25150).                    

*Date and Time:*                         December 8, 2010, 8:30 a.m.-5:15 p.m.; December 9, 2010, 8:30 a.m.-11:45 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Room 1235, Arlington, VA 22230.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Open.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Kristen Oberright, Office of the Director, Office of Cyberinfrastructure (OD/OCI), National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Suite 1145, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone: 703-292-8970.                    

*Minutes:*                         May be obtained from the contact person listed above.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To advise NSF on the impact of its policies, programs and activities on the CI community. To provide advice to the Director/NSF on issues related to long-range planning, and to form ad hoc subcommittees to carry out needed studies and tasks.                    

*Agenda:*                         Report from the Director. Discussion of CI research initiatives, education, diversity, workforce issues in CI and long-range funding outlook.                    

Dated: November 22, 2010.

Susanne Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2010-29747 Filed 11-24-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| Dated: May 15, 2007                                                                                        |   |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                                                                                       |   |   |   |
| /s/ Yuchuan              Liu                                                                          |   |   |   |
| Yuchuan              Liu                                                                                   |   |   |        |
| Chairman,                Director, andChief                Executive Officer (principal executive officer) |   |   |   |

|                                                                                                                      |   |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Fang              Chen                                                                                           |   |   |   |
| Fang              Chen                                                                                                    |   |   |        |
| Chief                Financial Officer (principal                financial officer and principal accounting officer) |   |   |   |
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jose Antonio Velez, Appellant.

Order of the County Court, Suffolk County, dated July 27, 1966, affirmed. No opinion. (An order was made by the same court on October 17, 1966, denying defendant’s motion for reargument.) Beldoek, P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur. •
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Albert Gottschall, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Reynolds, J.

Appeal by the claimant from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board holding claimant ineligible to receive benefits effective for the statutory week ending April 4, 1965 on the grounds that he was not totally unemployed (Labor Law, § 522); charging him with an overpayment of $30 ruled to be recoverable; and holding that he willfully misrepresented to obtain benefits for which a forfeiture of 24 effective days was imposed (Labor Law, § 594). There is no question that claimant for the week March 29 through April 4, 1965 certified that he was totally unemployed for four days when in fact he was employed. His only explanation was that due to personal difficulties he made a “mistake”. This explanation was, of course, only a factor for the board’s evaluation in determining its disposition of the ease and we cannot say, as a matter of law, that it, on the instant record, could not reach the decision rendered *(Matter of Clemente*[Catherwood], 27 A D 2d 676). Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur in a memorandum decision by Reynolds, J.