alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

            In connection with the Quarterly Report of Amalgamated Pictures Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Avery Pack, President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: July 14, 2010

| /s/ Avery Pack                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
| Avery Pack, President and        Chief Executive Officer        (Principal Executive Officer) and        Acting Chief Financial Officer        (Principal Financial Officer and        Principal Accounting Officer) |
##  Estimated Water Use In Arkansas, 2000 

By Terrance W. Holland

This   document is available in Portable Document Format (PDF):     SIR2004-5230 (4.86 MB)To view this document, you need the Adobe Acrobat® Reader installed on your computer. (A freecopy of the Acrobat® Reader may be downloaded from Adobe Systems      Incorporated.)

----

## Abstract

  The water-use program in Arkansas is a cooperative effort between Arkansas Soil and Water Conservation Commission and the U.S. Geological Survey. During 2000, the amount of water withdrawn from ground- and surface-water sources in Arkansas was estimated to be 10,963 million gallons per day (Mgal/d). Of this amount, about 6,952 Mgal/d (63 percent) were from ground water and about 4,011 Mgal/d (37 percent) were from surface-water sources.
# CI2021380EN.01000201.xml

| 20.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 380/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 380/2

---

Statement by the European Parliament on Council Decision 2010/427/EU and strategic coordination

(2021/C 380 I/02)

The European Parliament notes that the references to the Union’s external action instruments in Article 9 of Council Decision 2010/427/EU are obsolete, and therefore considers that, for the sake of legal clarity, that Article should be updated, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 27(3) of the Treaty on European Union, in order to take into account the Union external assistance instruments applicable in the period of the 2021-2027 MFF, namely the Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument – Global Europe, the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance, the European Instrument for International Nuclear Safety Cooperation and the Decision on the Overseas Association, including Greenland.

The European Parliament calls on the Commission and on the European External Action Service (EEAS) to establish a strategic coordination structure composed of all relevant Commission services and of the EEAS in order to ensure coherence, synergy, transparency and accountability in accordance with Article 5 of Regulation (EU) 2021/947 establishing the Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument – Global Europe (1).

---

(1)  Regulation (EU) 2021/947 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 June 2021 establishing the Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument – Global Europe, amending and repealing Decision No 466/2014/EU and repealing Regulation (EU) 2017/1601 and Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 480/2009 (OJ L 209, 14.6.2021, p. 1).

---
# CI2021201EN.01000101.xml

| 28.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 201/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 201/1

---

Statement by the European Commission on the specific allocations for the platforms of Centres of vocational excellence

(2021/C 201 I/01)

Without prejudice to the powers of the legislative and budgetary authority, the Commission commits to allocating an indicative amount of EUR 400 million in current prices to support platforms of Centres for vocational excellence over the whole duration of the programme, provided that the interim evaluation of the programme confirms a positive assessment of the results of the action.

---
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Patricia G. Fritz, :

Petitioner :

:

v. : No. 1034 C.D. 2019

:

Unemployment Compensation :

Board of Review, :

Respondent :

PER CURIAM O R D E R

NOW, June 5, 2020

, upon consideration of P etitioner’s

application for re consideration , the application is denied.
#### In the Matter of Walter W. Pegalis (Admitted as William W. Pegalis), an Attorney.

Motion for reinstatement granted. Concur—- Stevens, P. J., Tüzer, MeGivern, McNally and Steuer, JJ.
#### In re RANDALL.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 12, 1906.)

In the matter of Samuel H. Randall.

No opinion. Reference ordered. Settle' order on notice.
#### § 3560.601 General.

This subpart contains the requirements for making loans for on-farm labor housing and for ongoing operation and management of on-farm labor housing. Unless otherwise specified in this subpart, the requirements of subparts A through K, N, O, and P of this part will apply in addition to requirements given in this subpart.
# L_2020394EN.01000401.xml

| 24.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 394/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 394/4

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) 2020/1751

of 17 November 2020

conferring protection under Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the name ‘Würzburger Stein-Berg’ (PDO)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1), and in particular Article 99 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | In accordance with Article 97(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the Commission has examined the application to register the name ‘Würzburger Stein-Berg’ sent by Germany and has published it in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In accordance with Article 97(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the Commission has examined the application to register the name ‘Würzburger Stein-Berg’ sent by Germany and has published it in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | No statement of objection has been received by the Commission under Article 98 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

No statement of objection has been received by the Commission under Article 98 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.

| (3) | In accordance with Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the name ‘Würzburger Stein-Berg’ should be protected and entered in the register referred to in Article 104 of that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In accordance with Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the name ‘Würzburger Stein-Berg’ should be protected and entered in the register referred to in Article 104 of that Regulation.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Würzburger Stein-Berg’ (PDO) is hereby protected.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 November 2020.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 124, 17.4.2020, p. 26.

2

---
§ 3430.406 Matching requirements. ( a ) *In general.* NIFA requires the recipient of a grant under this section to provide funds or in-kind support from non-Federal sources in an amount at least equal to the amount provided by the Federal Government.
( b ) *Indirect costs.* Use of indirect costs as in-kind matching contributions is subject to § 3430.52(b).
( c ) *Waiver authority.* NIFA may waive the matching requirement specified in paragraph (a) of this section with respect to a grant if NIFA determines that: ( 1 ) The results of the project, while of particular benefit to a specific agricultural commodity, are likely to be applicable to agricultural commodities generally; or
( 2 ) When all three of the following conditions are present: ( i ) The project involves a minor commodity,
( ii ) The project deals with scientifically important research, and
( iii ) The grant recipient is unable to satisfy the matching funds requirement.
EXHIBIT 31.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT 1934, AS AMENDED, ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Francis K. Ruotolo, certify that: I have reviewed this annual report of ANTs software inc.;Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:a.Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc. Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; andThe small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: March 30, 2004

/s/ Francis K. RuotoloFrancis K. Ruotolo, Chairman andChief Executive Officer
Editorial Note on Part 3403
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3403 appear at 76 FR 4807, Jan. 27, 2011.

§ 3403.15 Other Federal statutes and regulations that apply. ( a ) The Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) issued guidance on Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards at 2 CFR part 200 on December 26, 2013. In 2 CFR 400.1, the Department adopted OMB's guidance in subparts A through F of 2 CFR part 200, as supplemented by 2 CFR part 400, as the Department's policies and procedures for uniform administrative requirements, cost principles, and audit requirements for federal awards. As a result, this regulation contains references to 2 CFR part 200 as it has regulatory effect for the Department's programs and activities.”
( b ) Several other Federal statutes and/or regulations apply to grant proposals considered for review or to research project grants awarded under this part. These include but are not limited to:
2 CFR part 200—Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. 2 CFR part 180 and Part 417—OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Government-Wide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) and USDA Nonprocurement Debarment And Suspension 7 CFR part 1c—USDA Implementation of the Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects. 7 CFR 1.1—USDA Implementation of Freedom of Information Act. 7 CFR part 3—USDA Implementation of OMB Circular A-129 Regarding Debt Collection. 7 CFR part 15, subpart A—USDA Implementation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. 7 CFR part 3407—NIFA Procedures to Implement the National Environmental Policy Act; 29 U.S.C. 794 (section 504, Rehabilitation Act of 1973) and 7 CFR part 15B (USDA implementation of statute)—prohibiting discrimination based upon physical or mental handicap in Federally assisted programs; and 35 U.S.C. 200 *et seq.*—Bayh-Dole Act, controlling allocation of rights to inventions made by employees of small business firms and domestic nonprofit organizations, including universities, in Federally assisted programs (implementing regulations are contained in 37 CFR part 401).
[79 FR 75998, Dec. 19, 2014]
ex_10-9.htm


    
      

      

    

    Exhibit
10.9

     

    
      LETTER
OF INTENT

       

      02
February 2009

       

      Minera
Farellón Limitada

      Baldomero
Lillo

      Vallenar,
Chile

       

      
        	
                Re:

              	
                Pertenencia
      Irene Una al Dos

              


      

      
        	
                 
      

              	
                Comuna
      de Vallenar, Huasco, III Region,
Chile

              


      

       

      This
letter reflects the terms under which we intend to purchase these two mensura
pertenencias:

       

      
        	
                 
      

              	
                1.

              	
                The
      price is the equivalent of $21,000,000 Chilean pesos in US
      dollars.

              


      

       

      
        	
                 
      

              	
                2.

              	
                We
      will pay the notary costs incurred in documenting the purchase and
      transferring the titles.

              


      

       

      
        	
                 
      

              	
                3.

              	
                The
      closing will follow when we have completed our due diligence
      review.

              


      

       

      
        	
                 
      

              	
                4.

              	
                You
      will provide any data that you have and information that we request for
      our due diligence review.

              


      

       

      
        	
                 
      

              	
                5.

              	
                You
      hold the title to the mensuras free and clear of any claims and will keep
      them clear of claims.

              


      

       

      
        	
                 
      

              	
                6.

              	
                You
      will not offer the mensuras to any other party or accept any other
      offer

              


      

       

      Please
sign below acknowledging your consent to these terms.

       

      Yours
very truly,

       

      Minera
Polymet Ltda.

      
        
          	 	 	 	 	 
	
                  /s/
      Kevin Mitchell

                	 	 	
                   

                	 
	
                  Kevin
      Mitchell

                	 	 	
                   

                	 


        

      

       

      Minera Farellón Limitada
accepts the foregoing terms on 02th
February 2009.

      
        
          	 	 	 	 	 
	
                  /s/
      Kevin Mitchell

                	 	 	
                   

                	 
	
                  Kevin
      Mitchell
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-10-0000126

29-AUG-2014

08:19 AM
#### The State ex rel. Roy, Appellee, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellant.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Roy v. Indus. Comm.*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 137.]

(No. 96-2673

Submitted July 15, 1998

Decided September 16, 1998.)

*Sheerer & Pitts Co., L.P.A.,*and *Thomas R. Pitts,*for appellee.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Mary Ann O. Rini,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Cook, J., dissents.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-10554 & No. 95-10557 Conference Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus TODD ALAN ARNOLD, Defendant-Appellant. ******************** UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus STEPHEN GREGG ECHOLS, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:95-CR-001-A-(2) USDC No. 4:95-CR-001-A-(3)
- - - - - - - - - - April 19, 1996 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Todd Alan Arnold and Stephen Gregg Echols appeal their sentences following their guilty-plea convictions for conspiracy to commit mail fraud, wire fraud, bank fraud, and moneyNo. 95-10554 & 95-10557 -2- laundering; and for mail fraud, for their role in a telemarketing scheme. They argue that the district court erred in grouping the money-laundering and fraud counts under U.S.S.G. § 3D1.2 because the counts did not involve the same victims. Appellants did not raise the issue in the district court; we therefore review only for plain error. See United States v. Calverley , 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc), cert. denied , 115 S. Ct. 1266 (1995). We have reviewed the record, the arguments, and the district court's decision to group the counts, and find no error, plain or otherwise. See United States v. Leonard , 61 F.3d 1181, 1185-86 & n.5 (5th Cir. 1995). AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

I, Franklin D. Chu, Co-Chief Executive Officer and principal executive officer of Shanghai Century Acquisition Corporation (the
Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| |  |  | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarters ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 13, 2006



|                                           
|-------------------------------------------
|/s/ Franklin D. Chu                        
|Franklin D. Chu Principal executive
officer



22