alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY


CIM Trucking, Inc., an Illinois corporation
Firma, Inc., a California corporation
Firma Plastic Co., Inc., a California corporation
MacLeod Metals Co., a California corporation
Metal Management Aerospace, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Metal Management Alabama, Inc., a Delaware corporation
MTLM Arizona, Inc., an Arizona corporation
Metal Management Arizona, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company
Metal Management Connecticut, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Metal Management Gulf Coast, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Metal Management Indiana, Inc., a Illinois corporation
Metal Management Memphis, L.L.C., a Tennessee limited liability company
Metal Management Midwest, Inc., a Illinois corporation
Metal Management Mississippi, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company
Metal Management Northeast, Inc., a New Jersey corporation
Metal Management Ohio, Inc., a Ohio corporation
Metal Management S&A Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Metal Management Pittsburgh, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Metal Management Realty, Inc., an Arizona corporation
Metal Management Stainless & Alloy, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Metal Management Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Metal Management West, Inc., a Colorado corporation
Metal Management West Coast Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation
metals.com,Inc., a Delaware corporation
Proler Southwest Inc., a Texas corporation
Reserve Iron & Metal Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership
Trojan Trading Co., a California corporation

Southern Recycling, L.L.C., a Louisiana limited liability company (ownership of
a 28.5% interest)

Roundout Iron & Metal, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company (ownership
of 50%)
Conservation Stewardship Program

Contracts and Dollars Obligated On Active Contracts - Contract Fiscal 

State Number of

Contracts

Total Treated

Acres

Dollars

Obligated

Alabama 431 348,905 $4,087,316

Alaska 14 182,565 $1,329,565

Arizona 56 821,643 $4,003,337

Arkansas 620 569,519 $11,187,938

California 337 721,128 $5,975,203

Colorado 469 1,264,376 $11,746,128

Connecticut 13 8,467 $52,907

Delaware 25 14,448 $349,904

Florida 95 65,279 $1,216,126

Georgia 584 354,906 $10,245,599

Hawaii 16 7,098 $105,873

Idaho 202 351,087 $4,143,039

Illinois 542 402,697 $8,696,724

Indiana 308 211,565 $5,212,795

Iowa 1,480 797,605 $20,255,574

Kansas 872 1,216,415 $18,000,610

Kentucky 182 62,111 $928,525

Louisiana 321 264,940 $5,554,729

Maine 102 70,381 $528,394

Maryland 65 24,249 $741,914

Massachusetts 11 7,324 $58,135

Michigan 544 229,963 $4,678,331

Minnesota 1,575 915,761 $21,377,320

Mississippi 319 352,265 $8,980,074

Missouri 1,939 976,001 $16,557,469

Montana 486 1,810,055 $15,066,536

Nebraska 1,106 1,836,928 $20,152,534

Nevada 17 23,829 $300,124

New

Hampshire 17 3,430 $46,650

New Jersey 9 2,468 $71,225

New Mexico 172 1,478,740 $5,412,752

New York 321 159,602 $3,287,632

North Carolina 167 67,414 $1,054,090

Contracts and Dollars Obligated On Active Contracts - Contract Fiscal Year 2010 | NRCS Page 1 of 1

file://M:\Project\Nutrients - OST\4 - FL Estuary Criteria\15 - Economic Analysis\Econ Ref... 1/18/2012
#### KINSEY, Respondent, v. DONALDSON, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 10, 1906.)

Action by Russell L. Kinsey against George B. Donaldson, impleaded, etc.

No opinion. Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with costs, with leave to plead over upon payment of the costs of the demurrer and of this appeal.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2209 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2209

  To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-Chloro-3-[[3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-
                1,3-dioxopropyl]-amino]-do decyl ester.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 30, 2006

  Mr. DeMint introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on 4-Chloro-3-[[3-(4-methoxyphenyl)-
                1,3-dioxopropyl]-amino]-do decyl ester.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 4-CHLORO-3-[[3-(4-METHOXYPHENYL)-1,3-DIOXOPROPYL]-AMINO]-
              DODECYL ESTER.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.09.01      4-Chloro-3-[[3-(4-  Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         methoxyphenyl)-                                                    31/2008
                         1,3-dioxopropyl]-
                         amino]-dodecyl
                         ester (CAS No.
                         33942-96-0)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2924.29.71)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

October 17, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00134

- CV

IN INTEREST OF I.S.F .P., A CHILD

From the 451st Judicial District Court

, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13

- 028

Honorable Bill R. Palmer , Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellants’ motion for extension of time is DENIED, and this appeal is DISMISSED. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8.

It is so ORDERED on October 17, 2018

.

_____________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 17th day of October, 2018

.

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court
Exhibit
      23.1





Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We
      have
      issued our reports dated March 13, 2006, accompanying the financial statements
      and schedules and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal
      control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of Theragenics
      Corporation  on
      Form
      10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. We hereby consent to the
      incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of
      Theragenics Corporation ® on Form
      S-8, file numbers 333-48136, 333-15313, 333-40737, 333-40653, 333-64801 and
      on
      Form S-3 333-127551.







/s/
      GRANT
      THORNTON LLP





Atlanta,
      Georgia


March
      13,
      2006
#### § 28.47 Statement of finding for comparisons.

For requests to compare samples to a type, findings shall be stated in terms of the classification of each sample submitted, the classification of the type as measured by the official cotton standards of the United States, and other explanatory notations as needed.

[81 FR 7030, Feb. 10, 2016]
98-1824.

#### State v. Vidu.

Cuyahoga App. Nos. 71703 and 71704. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. Upon consideration of appellants’ emergency motion for stay of court of appeals’ decision and for bail pending appeal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for stay and for bond be, and hereby is, granted, and bond shall continue in the amount previously set by the trial court.

F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:94cr4046-WS

WASEEM MINHAS and 4:06cv227-WS

NAVEEN MINHAS,

Defendant.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 80)

docketed December 26, 2007. The magistrate judge recommends that the defendants'

petitions for writs of error coram nobis be denied. The defendants have filed no

objections to the report and recommendation.

Upon review of the record, this court has determined that the magistrate judge’s

report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 80) is hereby

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order.

Case 4:94-cr-04046-WS-WCS Document 81 Filed 01/28/08 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 4:94cr4046-WS

2. The defendants' petitions for writs of error coram nobis (docs. 55 & 65) are

DENIED.

3. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and shall close Case No.

4:06cv227-WS.

DONE AND ORDERED this 28th day of January , 2008.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:94-cr-04046-WS-WCS Document 81 Filed 01/28/08 Page 2 of 2
#### § 29.26 Office of inspection.

A field office of the tobacco inspection service of the Division.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T T HE R ON N. L YN C H, P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. A L A M E D A C O U N T Y ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 09- 15192 D . C . N o . 4 : 0 8 -cv -0 5 4 2 4 -P JH ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e N o rth e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia P hy l l i s J . H a m i l t on, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r13, 2010 ** B efo re: S IL V E R M A N , C A L L A H A N , an dN . R . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. T heron N . L ynch, a C al i forni a s t at e pri soner, appeal s pro se fr om the di stri ct court ’ s j ud gm entdi sm i ss i ng hi s 42 U . S . C . § 1 98 3 act i on al l egi ng thatthe abstra ct o f ju d g m e n t f

o rh is s e n te n c e is in c o rr e c t an dr e q u ir e s h im to s e rv e h is f u ll s e n te n c e . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o . 

# FI LED OC T 06 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 15192 2 R es ni ck v. H ayes , 2 1 3 F. 3 d4 4 3 , 4 4 7 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 0 ) . W e a f f i rm. T h e d i stri ctco u rtp ro p erl y d i sm i ssedth e act i o n as H ec k-barre d b ec ause a ju d g m e n t in L y n c h ’s f

a v o r“w o u ldn e c e s s ar ilyim p lyth e in v a lid ityo f h is . . . se nt ence , ” and L ynch has notdem on strat ed thathi s s ent ence has a l re ady bee n in v a lid a te d . H

ec k v . H um ph re y , 51 2 U . S . 47 7, 48 7 (19 94 ). AF F I RME D.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO.: 4:03cr20-SPM

MICHAEL OMEGA WALLACE

________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes before the court on defendant’s Motion Requesting Court Grant

Credit for Time Spent on Ankle Bracelet and/or Grant a Reduction in Sentence Pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). (Doc. 90). The government filed a response in opposition to

the motion. (Doc. 91).

Defendant was originally sentenced to 120 months in prison and eight years of

supervised release for possession with intent to distribute more than five grams of cocaine

based in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Sections 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(B)(iii) and

841(b)(1)(C). Defendant was released from prison on May 24, 2010. Defendant violated

his supervised release by failing to refrain from violating the law and by associating with

persons engaged in criminal activity. Consequently, defendant was sentenced to 24

months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release for violating his supervised

release. This sentence was in the middle of the recommended guideline range. Now,

defendant wishes to be credited for his time spent prior to his revocation hearing under a

curfew while wearing an electronic ankle bracelet.

In this context, “time spent” refers to official detention by the Bureau of Prison. 

Therefore, this kind of relief is only available to defendants who were detained in a penal

or correctional facility under the control of the Bureau of Prison. Steeples v. Augustine,

Case No. 4:07cv384-MCP-WCS, 2008 WL 660335, at *2 (N.D. Fla. March 7, 2008)(citing

Reno v. Koray, 515 U.S. 50, 58 (1995)). Here defendant was released on bail as he

awaited his revocation hearing. Defendant’s condition was distinctly different from an
Page 2 of 2

individual subject to the control and custody of the Bureau of Prison. Id. Therefore,

defendant is not entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, defendant’s motion (doc. 90)

is DENIED. 

DONE and ORDERED this 25th day of March, 2013. 

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No.: 4:03cr20-SPM
P. 1


# RCRA Box 321 Prepped by Ryan Dugan



## Document

Number: 

# 230 ) OGRC-S002 4 Docket Number: 

# F-93-OGRC-FFFF F

Printed 5/8/2007 3:36:32 PM

Sheet 230of 259P. 2

» * 

### OG-RC'5QOZXH

RAILROA D COMMISSIO NO FTEXA S

OI LAND GA S DIVISIO N KEN T HANCE , Chairma n JOH N SHARP , CommiMione r JAME S E . (JIM ) NUGENT , CommiMione r 

# 4^f$iA JI M MORROW , P.E . Directo r JAME S W . WALKER , JR .

Director, - Productio nAllocatio n (512 ) 463-683 8
170 1 N . CONGRES S CAPITO LSTATIO N—P . O . DRAWE R12967 AUSTIN . TEXA S 78711-296 7 January3 , 199 0 Odess a Reclamatio n No . 1 P.O . Bo x 223 0 Midland , TX 7970 2 RE : Annua l Renewa l o f Reclamatio n Plan t Permi t issue d pursuan t t o Oi l & Ga s Docke t No . 7B,7C,8,8A-92,61 5 effectiv e Januar y23 , 1989 . RECEIVE D R.R.C
. O F TEXA S Gentlemen : 

### JA N 0 5 199 0 Base d upo n you r writte n reques t an d b yapprova l o f the Commission' s fi=Sld Operation s personne l yo u ar e hereb ygrante d renewa l o f th e refereTTtrelr c pe r £m'£ § fo r a period o f on e (1 ) year , subjec t t o the provision s an d condition s se t ou t i n the prio r order . Pleas e attac h thi s renewa l t o your origina l reference d permi t i n orde r t o mak e availabl e t o Commissio n personne l a s require d o r requested . On e mont h prio r t o the expiratio n dat e o f thi s renewal , yo u ar e require d t o notif ythi s offic e b

ylette r whethe r yo u wis h t o renewagai n o r cance l the permit . I f yo u shoul d hav e an yquestion s regarding thi s matte r pleas e contac t Terry Harri s a t 512-463-6874 .

WJG/t h Your s truly ,



# Id. " ^ Willia m J . Gallagher* } Administrato r Audi t an

d Permit s

cc : RRC District
- 7B,7C^8 A Re x King , Fiel d Operation s fil e Southwes t Energ

yConsultants , Inc . PERMI T EXPIRATIO

NDATE : January23 , 199 1

AnEqual Opportunity Employer
Editorial Note on Part 3402
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3402 appear at 76 FR 4807, Jan. 27, 2011.

§ 3402.20 Other Federal statutes and regulations that apply. ( a ) The Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) issued guidance on Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards at 2 CFR part 200 on December 26, 2013. In 2 CFR 400.1, the Department adopted OMB's guidance in subparts A through F of 2 CFR part 200, as supplemented by 2 CFR part 400, as the Department's policies and procedures for uniform administrative requirements, cost principles, and audit requirements for federal awards. As a result, this regulation contains references to 2 CFR part 200 as it has regulatory effect for the Department's programs and activities.
( b ) Several other Federal statutes and/or regulations apply to grant proposals considered for review or to research project grants awarded under this part. These include but are not limited to:
2 CFR part 200—Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards. 2 CFR part 180 and Part 417—OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Government-Wide Debarment And Suspension (Nonprocurement) And USDA Nonprocurement Debarment And Suspension 7 CFR part 1c—USDA Implementation of the Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects. 7 CFR 1.1—USDA Implementation of Freedom of Information Act. 7 CFR part 3—USDA Implementation of OMB Circular A-129 Regarding Debt Collection. 7 CFR part 15, subpart A—USDA Implementation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. 7 CFR part 3407—NIFA procedures to implement the National Environmental Policy Act; 29 U.S.C. 794 (section 504, Rehabilitation Act of 1973) and 7 CFR part 15B (USDA implementation of statute)—prohibiting discrimination based upon physical or mental handicap in Federally assisted programs; and 35 U.S.C. 200 *et seq.*—Bayh-Dole Act, controlling allocation of rights to inventions made by employees of small business firms and domestic nonprofit organizations, including universities, in Federally assisted programs (implementing regulations are contained in 37 CFR part 401).
[79 FR 75998, Dec. 19, 2014]
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2294 

To remove from the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System 

certain properties in North Carolina. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 6, 2013 

Mr. MCINTYRE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To remove from the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier 

Resources System certain properties in North Carolina. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF PROPERTIES IN NORTH CARO4 LINA FROM JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL BAR5 RIER RESOURCES SYSTEM. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Interior shall 

7 revise one or more maps included in the set of maps enti8 tled ‘‘Coastal Barrier Resources System’’ referred to in 

9 section 4(a) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 

10 U.S.C. 3503(a)) and relating to John H. Chafee Coastal 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 2294 IH

1 Barrier Resources System units in North Carolina, as nec2 essary to remove from such system the properties located 

3 at the following postal addresses: 

4 (1) Lot Number 3, Waters Edge in Hampstead, 

5 NC 28443. 

6 (2) 182 S Beach Road, Wilmington, NC 28405. 

7 (3) 311 Windchase Lane, Wilmington, NC 

8 28409. 

9 (4) 225 Chimney Lane Wilmington, NC 28411. 

10 (b) AVAILABILITY.—The Secretary of the Interior 

11 shall keep each map revised under subsection (a) on file 

12 and available for inspection in accordance with section 

13 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 

14 3503(b)). 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION FOR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS



 Exhibit 10.17 
  
 Summary of Compensation for Named Executive Officers 
  
 Base Salary 
  
 As of March 15, 2005, the base salary of each of the “named executive officers”, as defined in Item 402 of Regulation S-K, of
MicroStrategy Incorporated (the “Company”), was as follows: 
  

				
	 Michael J. Saylor, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
	  	$	375,000
		
	 Sanju K. Bansal, Vice Chairman of the Board, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
	  	$	200,000
		
	 Jonathan F. Klein, Vice President, Law and General Counsel
	  	$	225,000
		
	 Arthur S. Locke, III, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
	  	$	225,000
		
	 Jeffrey A. Bedell, Vice President, Technology and Chief Technology Officer
	  	$	200,000
		
	 Eduardo S. Sanchez, Vice President, Worldwide Sales and Services
	  	$	250,000

  
 Cash Bonus Compensation

  
 The Compensation Committee is authorized to develop,
adopt and implement compensation arrangements, including cash bonus awards, for Mr. Saylor. The Compensation Committee has not yet determined the terms for any cash bonus plan or award for Mr. Saylor for 2005. 
  
 The Chief Executive Officer is authorized to develop, adopt and implement
compensation arrangements, including cash bonus awards, for Messrs. Bansal, Klein, Locke, Bedell and Sanchez. The Chief Executive Officer has not yet determined the terms for any such cash bonus plan or award for 2005. 
  
 Other Compensation 
  
 The Compensation Committee may also, from time to time, award each of the named executive officers compensation in the form
of stock options granted under the Company’s Second Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Option Plan. 
  
 On February 25, 2005, the Company entered into an agreement with Alcantara LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Alcantara”) of which Mr.
Saylor is the sole member. Under the agreement, the Company is (i) providing to Alcantara use of approximately 150 square feet of office space within the Company’s leased space at 1861 International Drive, McLean, Virginia, (ii) providing to
Alcantara various related services, and (iii) providing to Mr. Saylor gross-up payments in respect of taxes that he may incur as a result of the arrangement. The agreement does not require any rental or other payments from Alcantara or Mr. Saylor.
The Company has filed a copy of this agreement as Exhibit 10.19 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004. 
  
 The Company also pays Mr. Saylor’s monthly dues at a private club that offers dining services and hosts business, professional and social community
events.
```

[108th Congress Public Law 433]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ433.108]

[[Page 118 STAT. 1]]

Public Law 108-433
108th Congress

                            Joint Resolution

 
  Appointing <<NOTE: Dec. 3, 2004 -  [H.J. Res. 111]>> the day for the 
    convening of the first session of the One Hundred Ninth Congress.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That the first regular session 
of the One Hundred Ninth Congress shall begin at noon on Tuesday, 
January 4, 2005.

    Approved December 3, 2004.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.J. Res. 111:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):
            Nov. 17, considered and passed House.
            Nov. 19, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### In the Matter of Raquel Rosenthal, Petitioner, v Augustus Agate, as Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Respondent. Lorraine F. Orlando et al., Nonparty Respondents.

[813 NYS2d 916]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent, Augustus Agate, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Queens County, among other things, to sign an order to show cause to hold the nonparty respondents in contempt of court for failure to comply with a subpoena directing them to appear for postjudgment depositions in an action entitled *Rosenthal v Orlando,*pending in the Supreme Court, Queens County, under index No. 15126/96.

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Mandamus does not lie to compel a Justice of the Supreme Court to sign an order to show cause *(see Matter of Greenhaus v Milano,*242 AD2d 383 [1997]). Schmidt, J.P., Luciano, Spolzino and Fisher, JJ., concur.