alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2576 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Union Calendar No. 110
113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2576

                      [Report No. 113-152, Part I]

To amend title 49, United States Code, to modify requirements relating 
 to the availability of pipeline safety regulatory documents, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 28, 2013

  Mr. Denham (for himself, Ms. Brown of Florida, Mr. Shuster, and Mr. 
   Rahall) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the 
   Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

                             July 16, 2013

    Reported from the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

                             July 16, 2013

   The Committee on Energy and Commerce discharged; committed to the 
 Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to 
                               be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 49, United States Code, to modify requirements relating 
 to the availability of pipeline safety regulatory documents, and for 
                            other purposes.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AVAILABILITY OF PIPELINE SAFETY REGULATORY DOCUMENTS.

    Section 60102(p) of title 49, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``1 year'' and inserting ``3 years'';
            (2) by striking ``guidance or''; and
            (3) by striking ``, on an Internet Web site''.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 110

113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2576

                      [Report No. 113-152, Part I]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To amend title 49, United States Code, to modify requirements relating 
 to the availability of pipeline safety regulatory documents, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 16, 2013

    Reported from the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

                             July 16, 2013

   The Committee on Energy and Commerce discharged; committed to the 
 Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to 
                               be printed
```
# CI2021380EN.01000101.xml

| 20.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 380/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 380/1

---

Statement by the European Parliament on the suspension of assistance granted under the Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance (IPA III)

(2021/C 380 I/01)

The European Parliament notes that Regulation (EU) 2021/1529 establishing the Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance (IPA III) contains a general reference on the possibility of suspending assistance without specifying the concrete basis for such a decision. Such a suspension of assistance should be implemented in the event of degradation in democracy, human rights and rule of law by a beneficiary listed in Annex I.

The European Parliament considers that any suspension of assistance under this instrument would modify the overall financial scheme agreed under the ordinary legislative procedure. As a co-legislator and co-branch of the budgetary authority, the European Parliament is therefore entitled to fully exercise its prerogatives in that regard, if such a decision is to be taken.

---
<PAGE>
                                                            Exhibit 10.20.3




                                                              July 25, 1988
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
Mr. Robert A. Shinn
Vice President
O'Brien Energy Systems
225 S. Eighth Street
Philadelphia, PA 19106

Dear Bob:

     This letter hereby acknowledges the O'Brien Energy Systems and E. I.
du Pont de Nemours & Co. mutually agree to extend the required date by
which O'Brien must obtain all necessary permits to October 1, 1988, as is
defined in Paragraph 2 of the Amendment #1 to the Steam Purchase contract
for the proposed Parlin, NJ Cogeneration Project, dated January 12, 1988.

     If you have any questions or need additional information, please call.

     Sincerely,

     /s/ G. R. Carson

     G. R. Carson
     Senior Purchasing Agent



cc:  Chet George - Du Pont
§ 3430.609 Other considerations. ( a ) *Set aside.* ( 1 ) Not less than 5 percent of the funds used to carry out this subsection for a fiscal year shall be used to support programs and services that address the needs of— ( i ) Limited resource beginning farmers or ranchers (see 3430.602);
( ii ) Socially disadvantaged farmers or ranchers (as defined in section 355(e) of the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act (7 U.S.C. 2003(e)) who are beginning farmers or ranchers; and
( iii ) Farmworkers desiring to become farmers or ranchers.
( 2 ) Each fiscal year, NIFA shall set aside not less than 5 percent of the funds to support the standard BFRDP projects under this subpart to support programs and services that address the needs of veteran farmers and ranchers (as defined in section 2501(e) of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 (7 U.S.C. 2279(e)). Recipients of these funds may coordinate with a recipient of an award under section 1680 of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 (7 U.S.C. 5933) in addressing the needs of veteran farmers and ranchers with disabilities.
( b ) *Consecutive awards.* An eligible recipient may receive a consecutive grant for a standard BFRDP project under this subpart.
( c ) *Duration of awards.* The term of a grant for a standard BFRDP project under this subpart shall not exceed 3 years. Awards for all other projects under this subpart shall not exceed 5 years. No-cost extensions of time beyond the maximum award terms will not be considered or granted.
( d ) *Amount of grants.* A grant for a standard BFRDP project under this subpart shall not be in an amount that is more than $250,000 for each year.
[74 FR 45970, Sept. 4, 2009, as amended at 76 FR 35323, June 17, 2011; 81 FR 6416, Feb. 8, 2016]
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**     I, Jeff D. Morris, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Alon USA Energy, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statements of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:          a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;          b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and          c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):          a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: November 14, 2006 By:  /s/ Jeff D. Morris    Jeff D. Morris    Chief Executive Officer
§ 3430.201 Purpose. ( a ) *Focus areas.* The purpose of this program is to address the critical needs of the specialty crop industry by developing and disseminating science-based tools to address needs of specific crops and their regions, including the following five focus areas: ( 1 ) Research in plant breeding, genetics, genomics, and other methods to improve crop characteristics, such as— ( i ) Product, taste, quality, and appearance;
( ii ) Environmental responses and tolerances;
( iii ) Nutrient management, including plant nutrient uptake efficiency;
( iv ) Pest and disease management, including resistance to pests and diseases resulting in reduced application management strategies; and
( v ) Enhanced phytonutrient content.
( 2 ) Efforts to identify and address threats from pests and diseases, including threats to specialty crop pollinators.
( 3 ) Efforts to improve production efficiency, handling and processing, productivity, and profitability over the long term (including specialty crop policy and marketing).
( 4 ) New innovations and technology, including improved mechanization and technologies that delay or inhibit ripening.
( 5 ) Methods to prevent, detect, monitor, control, and respond to potential food safety hazards in the production and processing of specialty crops, including fresh produce.
( b ) *Other.* NIFA will award research and extension, including integrated, grants to eligible institutions listed in § 3430.203. In addition to the focus areas identified in this section, NIFA may include additional activities or focus areas that will further address the critical needs of the specialty crop industry. Some of these activities or focus areas may be identified by stakeholder groups or by NIFA in response to emerging critical needs of the specialty crop industry.
( c ) In addition to SCRI grants, NIFA will make competitive research and extension grants under the Emergency Citrus Disease Research and Extension program (see § 3430.209).
[74 FR 45740, Sept. 4, 2009, as amended at 81 FR 6414, Feb. 8, 2016]
Exhibit 10.2


 


Amendment No. 1


 


To


 


Lease Agreement


 


AMENDMENT dated this 8th
day of June, 2000 to the Lease Agreement, dated September 23, 1993 (the “Lease”)
between Gerstell Development Limited Partnership and WPGH, Inc., as changed to
Sinclair Media I, Inc.


 


WITNESSETH


 


WHEREAS,
the parties hereto wish to extend the term of the Lease for an additional term
of Seven (7) years, beginning September 1, 2000.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants herein contained, in
accordance with Section 1 of the lease, the parties hereto agree as
follows:


 


1.               The
parties acknowledge that the Lease is currently in full force and effect.


 


2.               The
definition of “Tenant” in the preamble of the Lease is hereby amended by
deleting the reference to “WPGH” and replacing it with a reference to “Sinclair
Media I, Inc.”.


 


3.               Section 1
of the Lease, is hereby amended by replacing it with the following:


 


“Term.  The Lease shall have an Extension Term
expiring on August 31, 2007, with three options for an additional seven
(7) year renewal term (the “Extension Term”). 
That said lease will have an annual rental of $251,167.20 payable in
advance in equal monthly installments of $20,930.60 for the period of 9/1/00 –
8/31/01.  And on each subsequent Anniversary
of the lease, the rent will increase 5%.


 


4.               Section 18
of the Lease is hereby amended by insertion of the following notice of address
for Landlord: “Gerstell Development Limited Partnership, 10706 Beaver Dam Road,
Cockeysville, MD 21030” and by insertion of the following notice for Tenant: “Sinclair
Media I, Inc., 10706 Beaver Dam Road, Cockeysville, MD
21030”.


 


5.               Each
of the other terms of the Lease shall remain in full force and effect be
unaffected by this Amendment No. 1.


 





















 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 1 as of the date first above
written.


 


	
   

  	
  Gerstell-Development
  Limited Partnership

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/ J. Duncan
  Smith

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  
	
   

  	
  Name: J. Duncan
  Smith

  
	
   

  	
  Title: Secretary

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Sinclair Media
  I, Inc.

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/ Robin Smith

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By: Robin Smith

  
	
   

  	
  Name:

  
	
   

  	
  Title: VP of
  Finance
H. R. 2600 

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen 

An Act 

To amend the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act to clarify how the Act 

applies to condominiums. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FOR RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM UNITS. 

(a) EXEMPTION.—Section 1403 of the Interstate Land Sales 

Full Disclosure Act (15 U.S.C. 1702) is amended— 

(1) in subsection (b)— 

(A) in paragraph (7)(C), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end; 

(B) in paragraph (8)(G), by striking the period at the 

end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

(C) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(9) the sale or lease of a condominium unit that is not 

exempt under subsection (a).’’; and 

(2) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(d) For purposes of subsection (b), the term ‘condominium 

unit’ means a unit of residential or commercial property to be 

designated for separate ownership pursuant to a condominium plan 

or declaration provided that upon conveyance— 

‘‘(1) the owner of such unit will have sole ownership of 

the unit and an undivided interest in the common elements 

appurtenant to the unit; and 

‘‘(2) the unit will be an improved lot.’’. 

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

The amendments made by this Act shall take effect 180 days 

after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
EXHIBIT 32.1



August 1, 2008

Securities and Exchange
Commission

100 F Street, NE

Washington, DC 20549



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Lazard Group
LLC (the Registrant) hereby certifies that the Registrants quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|                                                      
|/s/    Bruce Wasserstein                              
|Bruce Wasserstein Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 4:02-CR-045-SPM

THYRON RICHARDSON,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ACCEPTANCE OF GUILTY PLEA

PURSUANT TO the Report and Recommendation (doc. 331) of the United

States Magistrate Judge William C. Sherrill, to which there have been no timely

objections, and subject to the Court’s consideration of any Plea Agreement

pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(e)(2), the plea of guilty of the

Defendant, THYRON RICHARDSON, to Count One of the indictment is hereby

ACCEPTED. All parties shall appear before this Court for sentencing as

directed.

DONE AND ORDERED this eleventh day of August, 2008.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.27

                SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

                          OF AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

      Non-employee directors of Akamai Technologies, Inc. ("Akamai") are
entitled to annual compensation of $120,000, of which $20,000 is paid in cash
and $100,000 is paid in deferred stock units ("DSUs") representing the right to
acquire shares of Akamai common stock. The number of DSUs issued is based on the
fair market value of Akamai's common stock on the date of its annual
stockholders meeting. For so long as the person remains a director, DSUs will
vest over a two-year period. In addition, Akamai's Lead Director and the Chair
of its Audit Committee are entitled to $25,000 of additional compensation, of
which $15,000 is paid in cash and $10,000 is paid in DSUs. Chairs of the two
other board committees are entitled to $10,000 of compensation, of which $5,000
is paid in cash and $5,000 is paid in DSUs. Each non-employee director is
eligible to receive fair market value options to purchase 50,000 shares of its
common stock when he or she joins the Board of Directors. Akamai also reimburses
directors for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending meetings
of the Board of Directors.
###### Editorial Note on Subpart E of Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part appear at 87 FR 80005, Dec. 29, 2022.

#### § 301.45-11 Costs and charges.

The services of the inspector shall be furnished without cost. The U.S. Department of Agriculture will not be responsible for any costs or charges incident to inspections or compliance with the provisions of the quarantine and regulations in this subpart, other than for the services of the inspector.
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS

*June 5, 2006.*

[Cite as *06/05/2006 Case Announcements,*2006-Ohio-2763.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2006-0919.

#### Conley v. Smith.

Stark App. No. 2005CA00215, 2006-Ohio-1498. This cause is pending before this court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. Upon consideration of appellee’s motion to dismiss and/or suggestion of bankruptcy stay,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this case is stayed pending further order of this court.

*1490IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file a notice with this court upon the termination of the automatic stay under the Bankruptcy Code.
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2015-0242

 Directorate Identifier: 2014NM100AD

A300-53-6173 --- 8/1/13

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
#### In the Matter of Arthur W. Wlodarek, Appellant, v Barbara A. Wlodarek, Respondent.

(Appeal No. 1.)

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and matter remitted to Jefferson County Family Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: Appellant husband appeals from two orders of Family Court. The first held him in contempt for a willful failure to pay alimony and child support and the second denied his motion to vacate the order of commitment entered on the court’s finding of contempt. The proceedings were initiated by appellant’s petition to modify the support provisions contained in a prior divorce decree. Family Court apparently believed that it was powerless to modify the provisions of the decree and granted the cross motion of respondent wife seeking enforcement of the support and alimony provisions for payment of arrearages. The alimony and support provisions of the divorce decree were not the result of a prior general separation agreement but were composed upon the oral stipulation of opposing counsel at the time of the divorce trial. There was no stipulation against merger and they were not, as the court apparently believed, subject to the rule stated in *Matter of Boden v Boden*(42 NY2d 210). The alimony should have been modified if appellant produced sufficient evidence of a change in his circumstances warranting such relief. Appellant did so by establishing that since the divorce he had lost his job and was dependent entirely upon the income from a military pension and unemployment insurance. These circumstances overcame the finding of willful nonpayment and required the court to review the application to modify (see *Weaver v Weaver,*72 AD2d 221,223). We are unable to render that relief here because the needs of the parties cannot be determined on the present record, and the evidence indicates that there has probably been a change in the positions of the parties since the hearing. Accordingly, we reverse the orders and remit the matter to Family Court for further proceedings. (Appeal from order of Jefferson County Family Court — support.) Present — Simons, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Doerr and Witmer, JJ.