alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

MARIA BREWSTER ARCHIE aka MARIA BREWSTER HUNT,

Plaintiff,
CASE NO.:4:03cv307-RHIWCS
vs.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.

REPORT OF PARTIES’ PLANNING MEETING

COMES NOW the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA by and
through the undersigned Assistant U.S. Attorney, and Plaintiff through her
counsel, and files this Report of Parties’ Planning Meeting in accordance with
the Initial Scheduling Order of this Court entered on January 12, 2004.
(i) The parties conferred regarding their willingness to consent to
magistrate judge jurisdiction.
(ii) The Plaintiff alleges that the Plaintiff was injured by the negligence
of the Defendant. The United States of America denies Plaintiffs

allegation against it and has raised numerous defenses.



(iii) | Mediation may be helpful after limited discovery.

(iv) | Any amendments to the pleading will be done within 60 days.

(v) Because of pending caseloads and schedules, the parties request
that discovery deadline be set for June 1 2004. The parties agree
that Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures will be due within 30 days.

(vi) The parties’ request that the case be set for trial after the Court acts
on dispositive motions.

(vil) N/A

(viii) N/A

JS AANK 213 fo (i
O

ROY BLONDEAU
Assistant U.S. Attorney

A West Jefferson Street 111 North Adams Street
Aliahassee, Florida 32301 Tallahassee, Florida 32301
Florida Bar No. 0966843 Florida Bar No. 0210013
850-222-8080 850-942-8430



| HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the forgoing was mailed
This kad day of February, 2004, to James V. Cook, Attorney for the

Defendant, 314 West Jefferson, Tallahassee, Florida32301.

ROY BLONDEAU
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Each of
the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Sino Gas
International Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1)
 The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal period
ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Date:
December 29, 2008





/s/
      Yuchuan LiuYuchuan
      LiuChief
      Executive Officer/s/
      Yugang ZhangYugang
      ZhangChief
      Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs CASE NO: 3:99CR81-001\LAC

GREGORY PAUL LAKE,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER REDUCING SENTENCE

Before the Court is the Government's Rule 35 Motion advising that a reduction in

defendant's sentence may be warranted by his cooperation and substantial assistance since

his sentencing. The Court finds that a reduction is proper to reward his substantial assistance

to the Government in the prosecution of others.

Defendant's sentence of confinement is, therefore, reduced on Count I from 310

months to 160 months and on Count 2 from 120 months to 60 months to run concurrent, one

with the other. In all other respects, the original sentence imposed in the Judgment and

Commitment Order filed 22 February 2000 shall remain unchanged.

ORDERED this 17th day of July 2006.

 s/L.A. Collier 

 LACEY A. COLLIER

 Senior United States District Judge

Case 3:99-cr-00081-LC Document 142 Filed 07/17/06 Page 1 of 1
Fw: Proposed Ozone regulations

Jackie Ashley to: Tricia Crabtree 01/08/2010 04:10 PM

Tricia -

Below is an email comment that we may want to add to the ozone docket once it opens. Thanks!

___________________________________

Jackie Ashley

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

US EPA

ashley.jackie@epa.gov

919-541-7664

----- Forwarded by Jackie Ashley/RTP/USEPA/US on 01/08/2010 04:09 PM -----

From: Cathy Milbourn/DC/USEPA/US

To: Andrea Drinkard/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Jackie Ashley/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 01/08/2010 04:02 PM

Subject: Fw: Proposed Ozone regulations

another fort the docket

----- Forwarded by Cathy Milbourn/DC/USEPA/US on 01/08/2010 03:48 PM -----

From: "dparnellm@gmail.com" <dparnellm@gmail.com>

To: Cathy Milbourn/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 01/08/2010 03:46 PM

Subject: Proposed Ozone regulations

Dear Ms. Milbourn,

I want to thank the EPA for its proposal to our nation's ozone regulations. As someone with 

asthma who believes in sanctity of human life, I hope that this proposal will be enacted. A future 

of cleaner air is something we can all look forward to.

Thank you for your consideration of my thoughts.

Sincerely,

Daniel McCarter
ECEIVED 

Before the U.S. Department of Transportation 

Federal Aviation Administration rt o Z 3 j.uii 

I [EARING DOCKET 

In the matter of 

M & R HELICOPTER 

Docket No. CPlOSOOOll ,_ 

FAA Case No. 2009SO9504ii 

Chief Judge Ronnie A. Yodep^ 

COMPLAINANT'S RESPONSE TO M & R HELICOPTERS' ^ -r 

MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT - TRAVEL LOG FOR 9^ ^ 

LATONYA WILLAIMS ^ , ^^ 

Complainant files this response to Respondent M & R Helicopters' 

(Respondent) Motion for More Definite Statement - Travel Log for Latonya Williams. 

This request is duplicitous. 

Complainant respectfully requests that the Chief Administrative Law Judge refer 

to Complainant's Response To M&R Helicopter's Motion For Specific Discovery -

Travel Log For Latonya Williams, filed on February 9, 2011, and deny Respondent's 

Motion for More Definite Statement - Travel Log for Latonya Williams. 

Respectfijlly submitted, 

Peter J. Lynch 

Assistant Chief Counsel 

By: /^aU^€i^ Vy<^:76i? 

ira Ponto 

Attorney 

Enforcement Division, AGC-300 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Phone: (202)267-9863 

Facsimile: (202)267-5106 

Date: February 18, 2011 
Certificate of Service 

I hereby certify that on this date I have placed in the U.S. mail, postage prepaid, 

certified return-receipt, a copy of Complainant's Response to Motion for More Definite 

Statement — Travel Log for Latonya Williams In the Matter ofM & R Helicopters, 

Docket No. CPlOSOOOllO, FAA Case no. 2009SO950434, addressed to: 

Dr. Michael B. Selig 

President 

M & R Helicopters, LLC 

2045 Westgate Dr., Suite 205 

Bethlehem, PA 18017 

In addition, I hereby certify that on this date I have sent by the U.S. mail, postage 

prepaid, certified return-receipt and facsimile one copy of the foregoing document to: 

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Facsimile: 202-366-7536 

In addition, I hereby certify that on this date I have sent by the U.S. mail, postage 

prepaid, certified return-receipt, the original and one copy of the foregoing document to: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Dated: February 18, 2011
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OFA MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 02-4782



# 
K EVIN L EE M ILLER ,

Defendant-Appellant. 

# 
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District Judge. (CR-02-89, CR-02-90, CR-02-91, CR-02-92, CR-02-93, CR-02-94, CR-02-95, CR-02-96, CR-02-97)

Submitted: April 24, 2003 Decided: May 2, 2003 Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL Louis C. Allen, III, Federal Public Defender, William S. Trivette, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Anna Mills Wagoner, United States Attorney, Paul A. Weinman, Assistant United States Attorney, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

OPINION
PER CURIAM:Kevin Miller appeals his 142-month sentence imposed by the district court following his guilty plea to eight counts of bank robbery and attempted bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) (2000). Counsel has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Additionally, Miller has filed a pro se supplemental brief. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.
In counsel’s Anders brief, Miller contends the district court erredin including three prior allegedly uncounseled convictions in determining his criminal history level. In assessing challenges to a sentencing court’s application of the Sentencing Guidelines, we review factual determinations for clear error and legal issues de novo. United States v. Singh , 54 F.3d 1182, 1190 (4th Cir. 1995). The district court, based on Miller’s own testimony at his sentencing hearing, foundMiller waived his right to counsel in each of the contested convictions. We find no error in this determination. We have reviewed the additional arguments and issues raised by Miller in his pro se supplemental brief and find them to be without merit. Pursuant to Anders , we have reviewed the record and find no error. Accordingly, we affirm Miller’s conviction and sentence. This court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oralargument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED 2 U NITED S TATES v. M ILLER
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 258 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.258

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and thirteen

                                 An Act

 
   To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to fraudulent 
  representations about having received military decorations or medals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Stolen Valor Act of 2013''.
SEC. 2. FRAUDULENT REPRESENTATIONS ABOUT RECEIPT OF MILITARY 
DECORATIONS OR MEDALS.
    (a) In General.--Section 704 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended--
        (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``wears,''; and
        (2) so that subsection (b) reads as follows:
    ``(b) Fraudulent Representations About Receipt of Military 
Decorations or Medals.--Whoever, with intent to obtain money, property, 
or other tangible benefit, fraudulently holds oneself out to be a 
recipient of a decoration or medal described in subsection (c)(2) or 
(d) shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than one year, 
or both.''.
    (b) Addition of Certain Other Medals.--Section 704(d) of title 18, 
United States Code, is amended--
        (1) by striking ``If a decoration'' and inserting the 
    following:
        ``(1) In general.--If a decoration'';
        (2) by inserting ``a combat badge,'' after ``1129 of title 
    10,''; and
        (3) by adding at the end the following:
        ``(2) Combat badge defined.--In this subsection, the term 
    `combat badge' means a Combat Infantryman's Badge, Combat Action 
    Badge, Combat Medical Badge, Combat Action Ribbon, or Combat Action 
    Medal.''.
    (c) Conforming Amendment.--Section 704 of title 18, United States 
Code, is amended in each of subsections (c)(1) and (d) by striking ``or 
(b)''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### § 3430.20 Acknowledgment of an application.

The receipt of all letters of intent and applications will be acknowledged by NIFA. Applicants who do not receive an acknowledgement within a certain number of days (as established in the RFA, e.g., 15 and 30 days) of the submission deadline should contact the program contact. Once the application has been assigned a proposal number by NIFA, that number should be cited on all future correspondence.
```

[106th Congress Public Law 219]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ219.106]

[[Page 114 STAT. 346]]

Public Law 106-219
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To designate the Washington Opera in Washington, D.C., as the National 
             Opera. <<NOTE: June 20, 2000 -  [H.R. 4542]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 20 USC 956a note.>> DESIGNATION.

    The Washington Opera, organized under the laws of the District of 
Columbia, is designated as the ``National Opera''.

SEC. 2. <<NOTE: 20 USC 956a and note.>> REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper or other 
record of the United States to the Washington Opera referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``National Opera''.

    Approved June 20, 2000.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4542:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):
            June 6, considered and passed House.
            June 7, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Board of Directors


Sino Gas International Holdings, Inc.




Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




We hereby consent to your reference of our reviewed report dated May 12, 2011 on the consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, and for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, of Sino Gas International Holdings, Inc., from the Company’s Quarter Report on Form 10-Q.




For the purpose of the aforesaid Form 10-Q, we also consent to the reference of our firm as “Experts” under the Experts’ caption, which, in so far as applicable to our firm means accounting experts.




San Mateo, California
Samuel H. Wong & Co., LLPMay 13, 2011
Certified Public Accountants
Exhibit 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                       SECTION 906 OF THE
                   SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Epolin, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended February 28, 2007,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of the undersigned's knowledge,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  May 24, 2007          By:  /s/ Greg Amato
                                   Greg Amato, Chief Executive
                                   Officer
                                   (Principal Executive Officer)


Dated:  May 24, 2007          By:  /s/ James Ivchenko
                                   James Ivchenko,
                                   President (Principal Financial
                                   Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5
<CIK>       0000796226
<NAME>      LESLIE FAY COMPANY, INC.
       
<S>                                   <C>    
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               Jan-02-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                  Jan-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                    Jan-02-1999
<CASH>                                                4,213
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        22,997
<ALLOWANCES>                                          6,825
<INVENTORY>                                          38,627
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     59,982
<PP&E>                                                3,190
<DEPRECIATION>                                          409
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       67,804
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                24,404
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                 69
<OTHER-SE>                                           36,368
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         67,804
<SALES>                                             152,867
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    115,547
<CGS>                                                24,300
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      950
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      12,070
<INCOME-TAX>                                          3,212
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   8,858
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                          8,858
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          1.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          1.31
        

</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 22-50540

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Johnathan Irvin Mckissick, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 7:21-CR-349-1

______________________________

Before Smith, Southwick, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Johnathan McKissick pleaded guilty of possessing five grams or more 

of actual methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 

(b)(1)(B). McKissick was not given a reduction under U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1 for 

acceptance of responsibility based on his post-plea conduct while in detention. As a result, his guideline range was 92 to 115 months of imprisonment. 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 6, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-50540 Document: 00516667245 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/06/2023
No. 22-50540

2

He was sentenced to 115 months plus five years of supervised release. He

maintains that the district court erred by denying him a reduction for acceptance of responsibility.

“A district court’s refusal to reduce a sentence for acceptance of 

responsibility is reviewed under a standard even more deferential than a pure 

clearly erroneous standard.” United States v. Najera, 915 F.3d 997, 1002 (5th 

Cir. 2019) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). We will not 

reverse the decision to deny such a reduction unless it is “without foundation.” United States v. Juarez-Duarte, 513 F.3d 204, 211 (5th Cir. 2008).

The record does not demonstrate that the decision to deny a § 3E1.1 

reduction—based on McKissick’s assaulting a fellow inmate while in 

detention—was “without foundation.” Id. “The defendant bears the burden of demonstrating that the information relied upon by the district court in 

sentencing is materially untrue.” United States v. Ramirez, 367 F.3d 274, 277 

(5th Cir. 2014). The court was entitled to rely on the information about the 

assault recorded in the PSR, given that it bore sufficient indicia of reliability 

because it was based on video recordings and statements of those present. 

See United States v. Harris, 702 F.3d 226, 230 (5th Cir. 2012). McKissick 

offered no evidence to rebut the disputed information; thus, he did not meet 

his burden to show that the district court relied on inaccurate or materially 

untrue information. See United States v. Alaniz, 726 F.3d 586, 619 (5th Cir. 

2013). Accordingly, the court did not reversibly err by denying McKissick a 

§ 3E1.1 reduction for acceptance of responsibility. See Najera, 915 F.3d 

at 1002.

AFFIRMED.

Case: 22-50540 Document: 00516667245 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/06/2023
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of Southern Trust Securities Holding Corp., Inc. (the Corporation) each certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the Corporations Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and the information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



|                |  |     |                        
|--------------- |  | --- | -----------------------
|                |  | By: | /s/ ROBERT ESCOBIO     
|                |  |     | Robert Escobio         
|                |  |     | Chief Executive Officer
|August 11, 2009 |  |     |                        
|                |  | By: | /s/ FERNANDO FUSSA     
|                |  |     | Fernando Fussa         
|                |  |     | Chief Financial Officer
|August 11, 2009 |  |     |                        
|                |  |     |                        



This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document, and may not be disclosed, distributed or used by any person for any reason other than as specifically required by law.
§ 3201.92 Fuel conditioners. ( a ) *Definition.* Products formulated to improve the performance and efficiency of engines by providing benefits such as removing accumulated deposits, increasing lubricity, removing moisture, increasing the cetane number, and/or preventing microbial growths within the fuel system.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The Federal preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 64 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than November 19, 2013, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased fuel conditioners. By that date, Federal agencies that have the responsibility for drafting or reviewing specifications for products to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased fuel conditioners.
[77 FR 69386, Nov. 19, 2012]