alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2275 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2275

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To temporarily increase the borrowing authority of the Federal 
    Emergency Management Agency for carrying out the national flood 
                           insurance program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Flood Insurance Program 
Enhanced Borrowing Authority Act of 2006''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN BORROWING AUTHORITY.

    The first sentence of subsection (a) of section 1309 of the 
National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4016(a)), as amended by 
the National Flood Insurance Program Further Enhanced Borrowing 
Authority Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-106; 119 Stat. 2288), is amended 
by striking ``$18,500,000,000'' and inserting ``$21,200,000,000''.

SEC. 3. EMERGENCY SPENDING.

    Amendments made pursuant to this Act are designated as emergency 
spending, as provided under section 402 of H. Con. Res. 95 (109th 
Congress).

            Passed the Senate February 10 (legislative day, February 
      9), 2006.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2275

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To temporarily increase the borrowing authority of the Federal 
    Emergency Management Agency for carrying out the national flood 
                           insurance program.
```
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 223 (Friday, November 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 70908]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29267]



[[Page 70908]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-930]


Circular Welded Austenitic Stainless Pressure Pipe From the 
People's Republic of China: Extension of the Time Limit for the 
Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

DATES: November 19, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brandon Farlander and Patrick 
O'Connor, AD/CVD Operations, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482-
0182 and (202) 482-0989, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    On April 27, 2010, the Department of Commerce (``the Department'') 
published in the Federal Register a notice of initiation of an 
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on circular welded 
austenitic stainless pressure pipe from the People's Republic of China. 
See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative 
Reviews and Request for Revocation in Part, 75 FR 22107 (April 27, 
2010). The period of review (``POR'') is September 5, 2008, through 
February 28, 2010.

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended (the ``Act''), the Department shall make a preliminary 
determination in an administrative review of an antidumping duty order 
within 245 days after the last day of the anniversary month of the date 
of publication of the order. However, if it is not practicable to 
complete the review within this time period, section 751(a)(3)(A) of 
the Act allows the Department to extend the time period to a maximum of 
365 days.
    The Department is extending the preliminary results by 120 days 
because the Department needs additional time to analyze information 
pertaining to Zhejiang Jiuli Hi-Tech Metals Co., Ltd.'s (``Zhejiang 
Jiuli'') sales practices, factors of production, subject merchandise 
and corporate relationships. Therefore, in accordance with section 
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, the Department is extending the time period 
for completing the preliminary results of the instant administrative 
review by 120 days from December 1, 2010, until March 31, 2011. The 
final results continue to be due 120 days after the publication of the 
preliminary results.
    This notice is published pursuant to sections 751(a) and 777(i) of 
the Act.

    Dated: November 10, 2010.
Susan H. Kuhbach,
Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing 
Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2010-29267 Filed 11-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. Case No: 3:99cr3/RV

3:05cv164/RV/MD

JEFFERY SCOTT DURHAM

_____________________________________________________________________

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and

recommendation dated September 15, 2005. The defendant previously has been

furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section

636(b)(1), and I have made a de novo determination of those portions to which an

objection has been made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto

timely filed by the parties, I have determined that the report and recommendation

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The defendant’s § 2255 motion is dismissed without prejudice due to

his failure to prosecute or comply with an order of the court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 25th day of October, 2005.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:99-cr-00003-RV-CJK Document 145 Filed 10/25/05 Page 1 of 1
§ 3555.201 Site requirements. ( a ) *Rural areas.* Rural Development will only guarantee loans made in rural areas designated as rural by Rural Development. However, if a rural area designation is changed to nonrural: ( 1 ) Existing conditional commitments in the former rural area will be honored;
( 2 ) A supplemental loan may be made in accordance with § 3555.101 in conjunction with a transfer and assumption of a guaranteed loan;
( 3 ) Loan requests where the application and purchase contract was complete prior to the area designation change may be approved; and
( 4 ) REO property sales and transfers with assumption may be processed.
( b ) *Site standards.* Sites must be modest and developed in accordance with any standards imposed by a State or local government and must meet all of the following requirements. ( 1 ) The site size must be typical for the area.
( 2 ) The site must not include income-producing land or buildings to be used principally for income-producing purposes. Vacant land without eligible residential improvements, or property used primarily for agriculture, farming or commercial enterprise is ineligible for a loan guarantee.
( 3 ) The site must be contiguous to and have direct access from a street, road, or driveway. Streets and roads must be hard surfaced or all weather surfaced and legally enforceable arrangements must be in place to ensure that needed maintenance will be provided.
( 4 ) The site must be supported by adequate utilities and water and wastewater disposal systems. Certain water and wastewater systems that are privately-owned may be acceptable if the lender determines that the systems are adequate, safe, compliant with applicable codes and requirements, and the cost or feasibility to connect to a public or community system is not reasonable. Certain community-owned water and wastewater systems may be acceptable if the lender determines that the systems are adequate, safe, and compliance with applicable codes and requirements. The Agency may require inspections on individual, central, or privately-owned and operated water or waste systems.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2272 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2272

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the deduction 
 for host families of foreign exchange and other students from $50 per 
                        month to $200 per month.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            February 10 (legislative day, February 9), 2006

  Mr. Coleman (for himself and Mr. Johnson) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the deduction 
 for host families of foreign exchange and other students from $50 per 
                        month to $200 per month.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Youth Exchange Support Act of 
2006''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN CHARITABLE DEDUCTION FOR AMOUNTS PAID TO MAINTAIN 
              CERTAIN STUDENTS AS MEMBERS OF TAXPAYER'S HOUSEHOLD.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (A) of section 170(g)(2) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to amounts paid to maintain 
certain students as members of taxpayer's household) is amended by 
striking ``$50'' and inserting ``$200''.
    (b) Adjustment for Inflation.--Section 170(g) of such Code is 
amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(5) Adjustment for inflation.--
                    ``(A) In general.--In the case of any taxable year 
                beginning in a calendar year after 2006, the $200 
                amount contained in paragraph (2)(A) shall be increased 
                by an amount equal to--
                            ``(i) $200, multiplied by
                            ``(ii) the cost-of-living adjustment 
                        determined under section 1(f)(3) for the 
                        calendar year in which the taxable year begins 
                        by substituting `calendar year 2005' for 
                        `calendar year 1992' in subparagraph (B) 
                        thereof.
                    ``(B) Rounding.--If any increase determined under 
                paragraph (1) is not a multiple of $10, such increase 
                shall be rounded to the next highest multiple of 
                $10.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this Act shall apply to 
taxable years beginning after December 31, 2005.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7815

KENNETH E. WILLIAMS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus COLIE L. RUSHTON, Warden; HENRY D. MCMASTER, South Carolina Attorney General, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CA-03-2449-0-23) Submitted: April 29, 2005 Decided: May 12, 2005 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kenneth E. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Kenneth E. Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
exv10w20



 






Exhibit 10.20




Summary Cash Compensation Sheet




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Name	 	Title	 	2004 Bonus	 	2005 Salary
	E. Kevin Hrusovsky

	 	President and
Chief Executive Officer
	 	$	418,000	 	 	$	400,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Stephen E. Creager

	 	Vice President and
General Counsel
	 	$	69,300	 	 	$	221,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Peter McAree

	 	Vice President,

Finance
	 	$	76,877	 	 	$	173,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Will Kruka

	 	Vice President,

Business Development
	 	$	81,576	 	 	$	215,000	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Andrea Chow

	 	Vice President,

Microfluidics R&D
	 	$	57,475	 	 	$	200,000	 





As previously disclosed on a Report of Form 8-K filed on December 14, 2004, the annual salary for
Thomas T. Higgins, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Caliper, who commenced
employment with Caliper on January 10, 2005, was previously established by the Board at $260,000.
Because his employment commenced with Caliper after the beginning of the year, Mr. Higgins was not
paid a bonus for 2004.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

ROBERT DICK,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 5:20-cv-150-TKW/MJF

ROBIN SMITH, et al.,

Defendants.

/

O R D E R

This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 22). No objections were filed. Upon due consideration of 

the Report and Recommendation and the case file, the Court agrees with the 

magistrate judge’s determination that this case should be dismissed based on

Plaintiff’s failure to completely and honestly disclose his litigation history.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§§1915A(b)(1) and 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) for maliciousness and abuse of the judicial

process.

Case 5:20-cv-00150-TKW-MJF Document 23 Filed 09/07/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

3. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this Order and close 

the case file.

DONE and ORDERED this 7th day of September, 2021.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:20-cv-00150-TKW-MJF Document 23 Filed 09/07/21 Page 2 of 2
Editorial Note on Part 3405
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3405 appear at 76 FR 4808, Jan. 27, 2011.

§ 3405.19 Monitoring progress of funded projects. ( a ) During the tenure of a grant, project directors must attend at least one national project directors meeting, if offered, in Washington, DC or any other announced location. The purpose of the meeting will be to discuss project and grant management opportunities for collaborative efforts, future directions for education reform, and opportunities to enhance dissemination of exemplary end products/results.
( b ) An Annual Performance Report must be submitted to the USDA program contact person within 90 days after the completion of the first year of the project and annually thereafter during the life of the grant. Generally, the Annual Performance Reports should include a summary of the overall progress toward project objectives, current problems or unusual developments, the next year's activities, and any other information that is pertinent to the ongoing project or which may be specified in the terms and conditions of the award.
( c ) A Final Performance Report must be submitted to the USDA program contact person within 90 days after the expiration date of the project. The expiration date is specified in the award documents and modifications thereto, if any. Generally, the Final Performance Report should be a summary of the completed project, including: A review of project objectives and accomplishments; a description of any products and outcomes resulting from the project; activities undertaken to disseminate products and outcomes; partnerships and collaborative ventures that resulted from the project; future initiatives that are planned as a result of the project; the impact of the project on the project director(s), the institution, and the food and agricultural sciences higher education system; and data on project personnel and beneficiaries. The Final Performance Report should be accompanied by samples or copies of any products or publications resulting from or developed by the project. The Final Performance Report must also contain any other information which may be specified in the terms and conditions of the award.
#### § 29.3058 Steam-dried.

The condition of unfermented tobacco as customarily prepared for storage by means of a redrying machine or other steam-conditioning equipment.

[24 FR 8771, Oct. 29, 1959. Redesignated at 47 FR 51722, Nov. 17, 1982, and at 49 FR 16758, Apr. 20, 1984]
#### § 201.30 Hard seed.

The label shall show the percentage of hard seed, if any is present, for any seed required to be labeled as to the percentage of germination, and the percentage of hard seed shall not be included as part of the germination percentage.

[32 FR 12779, Sept. 6, 1967]
#### Jane Sweeney, Respondent, v Raymond Sweeney, Appellant.

— In a matrimonial action in which a judgment of separation was entered in favor of the plaintiff wife upon the default of the defendant husband, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 24, 1979, which, *inter alia,*denied his motion to vacate the default judgment. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, motion granted and judgment vacated, on condition that defendant pay plaintiff alimony of $25 per week, plus child support of $25 per week per child (for a total of $125 per week). Defendant is directed to serve his answer within 10 days after service upon him of a copy of the order to be made hereon, together with notice of entry thereof. Plaintiff is to file her note of issue and statement of readiness within 20 days after service of the answer and the trial is to proceed expeditiously. In the event the condition is not complied with, then order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The circumstances which gave rise to the default in this case justify our reversal and the granting of defendant’s motion to open his default under the condition here indicated (see *Levy v Levy,*67 AD2d 998; *Hewlett*v *Hewlett,*63 AD2d 977). Gibbons, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2





Certification
of Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant
to


Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2009 (the “Report”) of ATS Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Pamela A.
Little, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.





Date:
      August 7, 2009
              By:
              /s/
      Pamela A. LittlePamela
      A. LittleExecutive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2217 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2217

   To suspend temporarily the duty on Aniline 2.5 Di-sulphonic Acid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 30, 2006

  Mr. DeMint introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on Aniline 2.5 Di-sulphonic Acid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ANILINE 2.5 DI-SULPHONIC ACID.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.08.02      Aniline 2.5 Di-     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         sulphonic Acid                                                     31/2008
                         (CAS No. 98-44-2)
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         2921.42.65)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 96-40099

Summary Calendar

__________________

CLAUDIS DEAN CARRINGTON,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CHUCK E. MORRIS, Sheriff;

ANDRES, Dr.,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. G-91-CV-205

- - - - - - - - - -

May 15, 1996

Before GARWOOD, WIENER and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Claudis Dean Carrington, a Texas state prisoner, appeals

from the district court's grant of summary judgment to the

defendants in his civil rights suit. Carrington has filed with

this court a request to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on

appeal. Carrington argues that the defendants denied him

adequate medical care after he fell from a top bunk bed while

incarcerated at the Chambers County Jail. We have reviewed the
No. 96-40099

-2-

record and conclude that Carrington has not demonstrated that he

will present a nonfrivolous issue on appeal. Accordingly,

Carrington's motion to proceed IFP on appeal is DENIED and the

appeal is DISMISSED. See Carson v. Polley, 689 F.2d 562, 586

(5th Cir. 1982); 5th Cir. R. 42.2.