alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6629

ANTHONY MCCULLOUGH,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

LLOYD L. WATERS; STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.

(CA-97-3527-JFM)

Submitted: January 29, 1999 Decided: March 4, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony McCullough, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony McCullough seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See McCullough v. Waters, No. CA-97-

3527-JFM (D. Md. Apr. 22, 1998). We deny McCullough’s motion for

appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
§ 18.9 Sanctions. ( a ) When the Secretary finds that any noncompliance with this part has occurred, he may initiate action to refuse to authorize payment of funds for the Cooperative Extension Service, or take other appropriate action provided by law.
( b ) The remedies available to the Secretary under this part, and remedies made available to any person under a program adopted pursuant to this part do not exclude any others which may be available under law.
#### Frank Engelhaupt, appellant, v. John R. Cox, Sr., and Laura Cox, appellees.

Gen. No. 8,861.

Opinion filed November 15, 1934.

Barnes & Magoon, for appellant. C. B. Chapman, for appellees.

Mr. Justice Huffman

delivered the opinion of the court.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 1:02cr45-MP-GRJ-3

CRAIG CHARLES BOLLES

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's Report and

Recommendation dated May 2, 2012. (Doc. 203). The parties have been furnished a copy

of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de

novo determination of any timely filed objections. 

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. 

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order. 

2. Defendant’s Motion for Relief from Judgment or Order (doc. 193) is

GRANTED.

3. The Second Amended Judgment (doc. 178) is VACATED, and a Third

Amended Judgment will be entered separately, reimposing the same sentence.

4. Defendant is advised that he has fourteen days from the date of the

reimposed sentence in which to file a notice of appeal.

DONE and ORDERED this 5th day of June, 2012.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:02-cr-00045-MP-GRJ Document 204 Filed 06/05/12 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAY-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1
<CASH>                                              23,759
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       55,123
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                        392,540
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                               3,656
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     508,256
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                            286,425
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                71
<OTHER-SE>                                         154,828
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       508,256
<SALES>                                            681,838
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   725,970
<CGS>                                              561,003
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   3,862
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     49,751
<INCOME-TAX>                                        20,306
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 29,445
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        29,445
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         4.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         3.10
                                                   

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of William F. Mendenhall, Petitioner, v Appeals Board of the Administrative Adjudication Bureau et al., Respondents.

Determination unanimously confirmed, without costs. Memorandum: There is substantial evidence in the record to support the determination, and so we may not disturb it *(Matter of Pell v Board of Educ.,*34 NY2d 222). (Article 78 proceeding transferred by order of Monroe Supreme Court.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Doerr and Witmer, JJ.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 1:94-cr-01036-MP

JAMES R YOUNG,

Defendant.

___________________________/

O R D E R 

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 121, Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence and

Modify PSR, filed by James R Young. Having reviewed the motion, the Court finds that it is

merely an attack on his conviction or sentence, which must be brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

2255. However, Mr. Young has previously had a § 2255 petition denied by this Court and did

not obtain a certification from the Eleventh Circuit to file a successive petition. Accordingly, the

Motion at doc. 121 is denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 16th day of April, 2008

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:94-cr-01036-MW-GRJ Document 123 Filed 04/16/08 Page 1 of 1
§ 3430.310 Allocation of AFRI funds. ( a ) *General.* The Secretary shall decide the allocation of funds among research, education, extension, and integrated multifunctional projects in an appropriate manner and in accordance with the allocation restrictions found in this section.
( b ) *Integrated programs.* Not less than 30 percent of funds allocated to AFRI each fiscal year shall be used to fund integrated programs.
( c ) *FASE awards.* ( 1 ) Each fiscal year, a percentage of AFRI funding (no less than 10 percent of the available funding) will be awarded as FASE awards. This percentage requirement may be adjusted by the Secretary based upon priorities and stakeholder input.
( 2 ) The Secretary shall use not less than 25 percent of the funds made available for FASE grants to provide fellowships to outstanding pre- and postdoctoral students for research in the agricultural sciences.
( d ) *Rapid Response Food and Agricultural Science for Emergency Issues Awards.* The Secretary may allocate some funding to address emergency issues in the food and agricultural sciences as determined by the Secretary. Letters of intent and applications may be requested, as appropriate. Although the solicitation and award processes may be expedited for these awards, NIFA will adhere to AFRI peer review and competitive requirements of this subpart.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to
      Section**  **906**


**of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





The
      undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
      Report on Form 10-K/A for the annual period ended December 31, 2007 of Naturade,
      Inc. (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the
      information contained in such periodic report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as
      of, and for, the periods presented in such report.





//s/
                Adam MichelinAdam
                Michelin*Chief
                Financial Officer*April
                30, 2008




**A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
      been**  **provided
      to the Company and it will be retained by the Company and furnished
      to**  **the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff on request** .
#### § 35.4 Carrier.

*Carrier* means any common or private carrier, including, but not being limited to, trucks, rail, airplanes, vessels, tramp or chartered steamers, whether carrying for hire or otherwise.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. Case No. 1:20-cr-14-AW-MAL 

1:22-cv-50-AW-MAL 

MARK DAVID LAFRENIER,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The court earlier adopted the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, 

denied the § 2255 motion, and entered final judgment. ECF Nos. 57, 58. No 

objections had been filed. Then, Defendant moved for an extension on his deadline

to object to the report and recommendation. ECF No. 59. Recognizing that this 

motion and the final judgment may have crossed in the mail, the court granted the 

motion, vacated the earlier order and judgment, and extended to November 20, 2023, 

Defendant’s deadline to submit objections. ECF No. 60. 

The new, extended deadline has now come and gone, and Defendant has again 

filed no objection. As before, I conclude the report and recommendation should be 

adopted and that the § 2255 motion should be denied. 

The court now orders the following:

1. The report and recommendation (ECF No. 56) is adopted and

incorporated into this order.

Case 1:20-cr-00014-AW-MAL Document 61 Filed 12/04/23 Page 1 of 2
2

2. The clerk will enter a new judgment that says, “The motion for § 2255 

relief is denied.”

3. A certificate of appealability is denied.

4. The clerk will again close the file.

SO ORDERED on December 4, 2023.

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cr-00014-AW-MAL Document 61 Filed 12/04/23 Page 2 of 2
## t/jCli&i^ ^ OFFIC EO FTH EIVIAYO R 

## Umm m$ CIT Y O FHOUSTO N

## -"p i O FI' - :SP0BTAI10

' 

## •i!^'.^' * TEXA S ANNIS ED . PARKE R' , " , , : \j \ MAYO R February18 , 201 0 ACTIO N 

# S

CONTRO L NO . Th e Honorabl e RayLaHoo d S10-100308-05 3 Secretary Unite d State s Departmen t o fTransportatio n 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenue , S E Washington , D.C . 

### 2059 0 Subject : Haned a Combinatio n Service s Allocatio n Proceedin g DOT-OST-2010-001 8 Dea rSecretaryLaHood : I support th e Continenta l Airline s applicatio n t o provid e dail ynonsto p servic e betwee n Ne wYork/Newar k

an d Toky o Haned a airport an d connectin g servic e betwee n th e Housto n regio n tha t I represen t an d Toky o Haned a vi a a n eas yconnectio n throug h Continental' s Newar k

Libert yhub . Ne wai rservic e t o Haneda , whic h i s schedule d t o begi n late rthi s year , i s mad e possibl e byth e wid e rangin g ope n skie s agreemen t wit h Japa n achieve d b yyou rDepartment . I applau d you reffort s o n th e histori cope n skie s agreemen t an d no wurg e yo u t o selec t Continenta l t o provid e servic e tha t wil l connec t othe rpoint s acros s th e centra l U.S . wit h Tokyo' s downtow n airport , Haneda . Continental' s worldwid e headquarter s i s locate d i n Housto n an d th e airlin e directl y employ s ove r17,00 0 peopl e i n th e stat e makin g th e compan ya ke ycomponen t o fth e Texa s economy . I suppor t Continental' s effort s t o growit s networ k fro m al l o fit s ke yhu b location s a s I understan d tha t wha t i s goo d fo rContinenta l i s goo d fo rth e Housto n region . Additionally , give n th e amoun t o fservic e betwee n ke yTexa s citie s lik e Housto n an d Newar k

Liberty , makin g a connectio n t o ne wToky o Haned a servic e i s eas yt o do . Finally , Continental' s proposa l t o serv e Haned a open s th e doo rfo rtraveler s an d shipper s i n m ycommunit yt o choos e betwee n nonsto p Toky o Narit a servic e fro m Housto n an d Newar k

an d nonsto p Toky o Haned a servic e fro m Newark . Continenta l Airline s i s committe d t o th e Asia n regio n an d t o nonsto p Toky o Haned a service . Th e economie s o fman yU.S . communities , million s o fAmerican s , th e airline' s thousand s o femployee s an d hundred s o fthousand s o fU.S . consumer s wil l benefi t fro m Continental' s propose d servic e an d wil l wor k togethe rt o mak e ne wToky o Haned a servic e a rea l success . I urg e yo u t o awar d Toky o Haned a right s t o Continenta l Airline s an d t o m ycommunity . Sincerely , V>V->toHMi_J5auA^^e- , Annis e D . Parke r Mayo r

POS TOFFIC EBO X156 2 • HOUSTON , TEXA S 7725 1
EXHIBIT 32.1



October 29, 2010

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F
Street, NE

Washington, DC 20549



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Lazard Group LLC (the Registrant) hereby certifies that the
Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|                                                      
|/s/    Kenneth M. Jacobs                              
|Kenneth M. Jacobs Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer



The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2626 

To extend funding for the Corporation for Travel Promotion under the Travel 

Promotion Act of 2009. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 8, 2013 

Ms. TITUS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To extend funding for the Corporation for Travel Promotion 

under the Travel Promotion Act of 2009. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CORPORATION FOR TRAVEL PROMOTION. 

4 Section 9(d)(2)(B) of the Travel Promotion Act of 

5 2009 (22 U.S.C. 2131(d)(2)(B)) is amended by striking 

6 ‘‘For each of fiscal years 2012 through 2015,’’ and insert7 ing ‘‘For fiscal year 2012 and each subsequent fiscal 

8 year,’’. 

Æ 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BlackRock Kelso Capital
Corporation (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), James R. Maher, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Frank D.
Gordon, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                    |  |                        
|------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ James R. Maher 
|Name:               |  | James R. Maher         
|Title:              |  | Chief Executive Officer
|Date:               |  | May 10, 2007           
|                   
|/s/ Frank D. Gordon
|Name:               |  | Frank D. Gordon        
|Title:              |  | Chief Financial Officer
|Date:               |  | May 10, 2007
H. R. 2337 

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen 

An Act 

To provide for the conveyance of the Forest Service Lake Hill Administrative Site 

in Summit County, Colorado. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lake Hill Administrative Site 

Affordable Housing Act’’. 

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

In this Act: 

(1) COUNTY.—The term ‘‘County’’ means Summit County, 

Colorado. 

(2) LAKE HILL ADMINISTRATIVE SITE.—The term ‘‘Lake Hill 

Administrative Site’’ means the parcel of approximately 40 

acres of National Forest System land in the County, as depicted 

on the map entitled ‘‘Lake Hill Administrative Site’’ and dated 

June 2012. 

(3) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means the Secretary 

of Agriculture. 

SEC. 3. CONVEYANCE OF FOREST SERVICE LAKE HILL ADMINISTRATIVE SITE, SUMMIT COUNTY, COLORADO. 

(a) CONVEYANCE AUTHORITY.—Upon receipt of an offer from 

the County in which the County agrees to the condition imposed 

by subsection (c), the Secretary shall use the authority provided 

by the Forest Service Facility Realignment and Enhancement Act 

of 2005 (Public Law 109–54; 16 U.S.C. 580d note) to convey to 

the County all right, title, and interest of the United States in 

and to the Forest Service Lake Hill Administrative Site. 

(b) APPLICATION OF LAW.— 

(1) TREATMENT AS ADMINISTRATIVE SITE.—The Lake Hill 

Administrative Site is considered to be an administrative site 

under section 502(1)(A) of the Forest Service Facility Realignment and Enhancement Act of 2005 (Public Law 109–54; 16 

U.S.C. 580d note). 

(2) EXCEPTION.—Section 502(1)(C) of that Act does not 

apply to the conveyance of the Lake Hill Administrative Site. 

(c) COSTS.—The County shall be responsible for processing and 

transaction costs related to the direct sale under subsection (a). 

(d) PROCEEDS.—Proceeds received from the conveyance pursuant to subsection (a) shall be available, without further appropriation and until expended, for capital improvement and maintenance 
H. R. 2337—2 

of Forest Service facilities in Region 2 of the United States Forest 

Service. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
2006-0279.

#### Baughman v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.

Summit App. No. 22204, 2005-Ohio-6980.

Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2533 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2533

  To impose a moratorium on conferences held by the Internal Revenue 
                                Service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 27, 2013

  Mr. Roskam introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To impose a moratorium on conferences held by the Internal Revenue 
                                Service.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop Playing on Citizen's Cash 
Act''.

SEC. 2. MORATORIUM ON IRS CONFERENCES.

    The Internal Revenue Service shall not hold any conference until--
            (1) the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration 
        submits a report to Congress--
                    (A) certifying that the Internal Revenue Service 
                has implemented all of the recommendations set out in 
                such Inspector General's report titled ``Review of the 
                August 2010 Small Business/Self-Employed Division's 
                Conference in Anaheim, California'', and
                    (B) describing such implementation, and
            (2) the Internal Revenue Service is authorized by law 
        (enacted after the date of the enactment of this Act) to resume 
        holding conferences.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 210.24 Withholding payments.

In accordance with Departmental regulations at 2 CFR 200.338 through 200.342, the State agency shall withhold Program payments, in whole or in part, to any school food authority which has failed to comply with the provisions of this part. Program payments shall be withheld until the school food authority takes corrective action satisfactory to the State agency, or gives evidence that such corrective action will be taken, or until the State agency terminates the grant in accordance with § 210.25 of this part. Subsequent to the State agency's acceptance of the corrective actions, payments will be released for any lunches served in accordance with the provisions of this part during the period the payments were withheld.

[56 FR 32948, July 17, 1991, as amended at 71 FR 39516, July 13, 2006; 72 FR 61492, Oct. 31, 2007; 81 FR 66488, Sept. 28, 2016]
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

CROUCHING TIGER HIDDEN DRAGON INVESTMENT GROUP LLC
, Appellant,

v.

SHORE WINDOW CLEANING LLC, and ALEX SHORE
, Appellee s

.

No. 4D 22

- 2353

[ March 2, 2023 ]

A ppeal of a non

- final order from the C ounty C ourt for the Fif teenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Melanie Dale Surber, Judge; L.T.

Case No. 502020CC004995XXXXSB

.

Barry S. Mittelberg of Barry S. Mittelberg, P.A., Coral Springs

, for appellant.

David Rosenb erg of Robertson, Anschutz, Schneid, Crane & Partners, PLLC, Boca Raton, for appellees

.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER
, F ORST and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.