Scott Richard Madans Phone: 775-530-6800 Email: Scott@GeneralUAS.com Page 1 of 16

Scott Richard Madans

5500 Tannerwood Drive

Reno, Nevada 89511 USA

Phone: 775-530-6800

Email: Scott@GeneralUAS.com

January 17, 2016

U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Dear Sir or Madam:

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (herein referred 

to as FMRA) and 14 CFR Part 11, Scott Richard Madans, an individual and FAA licensed 

ASEL private pilot, (herein referred to as Scott) hereby applies for an exemption from the 

listed Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs) to allow commercial operation of UAS for the 

acquisition of aerial data, so long as such operations are conducted within and under the 

conditions outlined herein or as may be established by the FAA.

As detailed in this document and the attached Appendix of UAS, the requested exemption

would permit the operation of UAS platforms previously approved by the FAA for

commercial operations in the United States. Approval of this exemption would thereby

enhance safety and fulfill the Secretary of Transportation’s responsibilities to “...establish

requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft systems in the national airspace system.” 

Section 333(c) Reform Act.

The name and address of the applicant is:

Scott Richard Madans

Founder, General UAS

5500 Tannerwood Drive

Reno, Nevada 89511 USA

Tel: 775-530-6800

Email: Scott@GeneralUAS.com
Scott Richard Madans Phone: 775-530-6800 Email: Scott@GeneralUAS.com Page 2 of 16

Regulations from which the exemption is requested:

14 CFR Part 21

14 CFR 45.23(b)

14 CFR 61.113(a) & (b) 14 CFR 91.7(a)

14 CFR 91.9(b)(2)

14 CFR 91.103

14 CFR 91.109

14 CFR 91.119

14 CFR 91.121

14 CFR 91.151(a)

14 CFR 91.203(a) & (b) 14 CFR 91.405(a)

14 CFR 407(a)(1) 14 CFR 409(a)(2) 14 CFR 417(a) & (b)

AUTHORITY FOR EXEMPTIONS

The Federal Aviation Act expressly grants the FAA authority to issue exemptions. This

statutory authority includes exempting civil aircraft, as the term is defined under §40101 of 

the Act, including UAS, from the requirement that all civil aircraft must have a current

airworthiness certificate.

The Administrator may grant an exemption from a requirement of a regulation prescribed

under subsection (a) or (b) of this section or any sections §44702-44716 of this title if the

Administrator finds the exemption in the public interest. 49 USC §44701(f). See also 49

USC §44711(a); 49 USC §44704; 14 CFR 91.203(a)(1).

Section 333(b) of the Reform Act assists the Secretary in determining whether UAS may

operate in the national airspace system without creating a hazard to the user, the public, or a 

threat to national security. In making this determination, the Secretary must consider:

 The UAS’ size, weight, speed and operational capability;

 Whether the UAS operates within the visual line of sight of the operator;

 Whether the UAS operates outside of highly populated areas and away from close

proximity to airports.

Reform Act 333(a). If the Secretary determines that a UAS “may operate safely in the

national airspace system, the Secretary shall establish requirements for the safe operation of 

such aircraft in the national airspace system.” Id. 333(c).

BACKGROUND ON SCOTT RICHARD MADANS

Scott is an FAA-licensed pilot since 1990 whose primary concern is flight safety. Scott is 

also an avid rotor-wing and fixed-wing model aircraft pilot. Scott holds sUAS hobby

registration: FA3N4YRMCR.

Scott will provide turnkey solutions utilizing UAS to deliver specific, low risk, and cost 

effective actionable data to clients. These solutions will specifically help clients avoid the 
Scott Richard Madans Phone: 775-530-6800 Email: Scott@GeneralUAS.com Page 3 of 16

capital expense and operating risks of establishing their own drone programs and enable 

clients to purchase drone support in a way which better fits their operations and cost profiles.

Scott believes in a risk-based and technology agnostic approach to operations in the national 

airspace. Approval for any operation should be based on an analysis of the specific risks 

associated with the fully integrated solution, rather than the individual components.

Scott’s business model is predicated on identifying requirements, developing the business 

case, and demonstrating the Return on Investment (ROI) by utilizing UAS for clients in a 

number of industries. Scott’s services are a custom integrated solution made up of select

components designed for each individual client.

UAS AND OPERATIONAL DESCRIPTION

Scott seeks to commercially operate a variety of UAS weighing less than 55 pounds

including payload in the United States for the purpose of acquiring aerial data. The

Appendix attached to this exemption petition lists the aircraft that Scott contemplates

operating. In prior, similar exemptions the Secretary has approved every UAS platform

included in the Appendix.

As the operator of these aircraft, Scott is committed to the following conditions and

limitations on its operations. Scott understands that failure to comply will be grounds for 

the immediate suspension or rescission any exemption granted.

1. Operations are limited to the UAS listed in the Appendix when weighing less than 55 

pounds including payload.

2. Operations for the purpose of closed-set motion picture and television filming are not 

contemplated at this time.

3. The aircraft will not be operated at a speed exceeding 87 knots (100 miles per hour). In

no case will the aircraft be operated at airspeeds greater than the maximum aircraft 

operating airspeed recommended by the aircraft manufacturer.

4. The aircraft will be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet above ground level 

(AGL). Altitude must be reported in feet AGL.

5. The aircraft will be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the Pilot in

Command (PIC) at all times. This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision

unaided by any device other than corrective lenses, as specified on the PIC’s U.S.

driver’s license.

6. All operations will utilize a visual observer (VO). The aircraft will be operated within 

the visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC and VO at all times.
Scott Richard Madans Phone: 775-530-6800 Email: Scott@GeneralUAS.com Page 4 of 16

7. All operating documents needed to operate the UAS and will be accessible during UAS 

operations and made available to the Administrator upon request. The operator will 

also present updated and revised documents if it petitions for extension or amendment.

8. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS operation 

or flight characteristics, e.g. replacement of a flight critical component, will undergo a 

functional test flight prior to conducting further operations.

9. Scott is responsible for maintaining and inspecting the UAS to ensure that it is in a 

condition for safe operation.

10. Prior to each flight, the PIC will conduct a pre-flight inspection and determine the UAS 

is in a condition for safe flight.

11. Scott will follow the UAS manufacturer’s maintenance, overhaul, replacement,

inspection, and life limit requirements for the aircraft and aircraft components.

12. Each UAS operated under this exemption will comply with all manufacturer safety 

bulletins.

13. The PIC will hold a UAS flight training certificate, in some cases training directly from 

the aircraft manufacturer, and a valid U.S. driver’s license issued by a state, the District 

of Columbia, Puerto Rico, a territory, a possession, or the Federal government.

14. Scott will not permit any PIC to operate unless the PIC demonstrates the ability to 

safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be operated to 

acquire aerial data, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining 

appropriate distances from persons, vessels, vehicles and structures. PIC qualification 

flight hours and currency will be logged in a manner consistent with 14 CFR § 61.51(b). 

Scott will operate flights for the purposes of training PICs and VOs (training, 

proficiency, and experience building) and determining the PIC’s ability to safely 

operate the UAS.

15. UAS operations will not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 CFR § 1.1. All 

operations will be conducted under visual meteorological conditions (VMC).

16. The aircraft will not operate within 5 nautical miles of an airport reference point (ARP) 

as denoted in the current FAA Airport/Facility Directory (AFD) or for airports not 

denoted with an ARP, the center of the airport symbol as denoted on the current FAApublished aeronautical chart, unless a letter of agreement with that airport’s 

management is obtained or otherwise permitted by a COA.

17. The aircraft will not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet

horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the PIC.
Scott Richard Madans Phone: 775-530-6800 Email: Scott@GeneralUAS.com Page 5 of 16

18. If the UAS loses communications or loses its GPS signal, the aircraft will return to a 

pre-determined location.

19. The PIC will abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies.

20. The PIC will be prohibited from beginning a flight unless (considering wind and

forecast weather conditions) there is enough available power or fuel for the aircraft to 

conduct the intended operation and to operate after that for at least five minutes or with 

the reserve power or fuel recommended by the manufacturer if greater.

21. All operations shall be conducted in accordance with an ATO-issued COA if the

blanket COA does not cover the intended operation.

22. All aircraft operated will be identified by serial number, registered in accordance with 

14 CFR Part 47, and have identification (N−Number) markings in accordance with 14 

CFR Part 45, Subpart C. Markings will be as large as practicable.

23. Documents used by Scott to ensure the safe operation and flight of the UAS and any 

documents required under 14 CFR §§ 91.9 and 91.203 will be available to the PIC at 

the Ground Control Station of the UAS any time the aircraft is operating.

24. The aircraft will remain clear and give way to all manned aviation operations and

activities at all times.

25. The UAS may be operated by the PIC from a moving device or vehicle; however,

specific requests will be made via subsequent COA.

26. All flight operations will be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonparticipating

persons, vessels, vehicles, and structures unless:

a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect nonparticipating

persons from the aircraft or debris in the event of an accident; or

b. The owner/controller/operator of any vessels, vehicles or structures has granted

permission for operating closer to those objects and the PIC has made an

assessment of the risk of operating closer to those objects and determined that it

does not present an undue hazard.

27. The PIC, VO, operator trainees or essential persons will not be considered

nonparticipating persons under this exemption.

28. All operations conducted over private or controlled-access property will be conducted 

with the permission from the property owner/controller or authorized representative. 

Permission from property owner/controller or authorized representative will be 

obtained for each flight to be conducted.

29. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical

boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable COA will be reported to 

the FAA's UAS Integration Office (AFS−80) within 24 hours. Accidents must be 

reported to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) per instructions contained 

on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov.
Scott Richard Madans Phone: 775-530-6800 Email: Scott@GeneralUAS.com Page 6 of 16

DESCRIPTION OF SPECIFIC REGULATIONS

14 CFR Part 21, Subpart H: Airworthiness certificates

Subpart H, establishes the procedural requirements for the issuance of airworthiness

certificates as required by FAR §91.203(a)(1). Given the size and limited operating area

associated with the aircraft to be utilized by Scott, an exemption from Part 21 Subpart H 

meets the requirements of an equivalent level of safety under Part 11 and Section 333 of the 

Reform Act. The Federal Aviation Act (49 USC §44701(f)) and Section 333 of the Reform 

Act both authorize the FAA to exempt aircraft from the requirement for an airworthiness 

certificate, upon consideration of the size, weight, speed, operational capability and 

proximity to airports and populated areas of the particular UAS. In all cases, an analysis of 

these criteria demonstrates that the UAS operated without an airworthiness certificate, in the 

restricted environment and under the conditions proposed, will be at least as safe, or safer, 

than a conventional aircraft operating with an airworthiness certificate without the 

restrictions and conditions proposed.

14 CFR 45.23(b): Marking of the aircraft

This regulation requires that certain experimental, provisionally certified aircraft, or 

lightsport category aircraft to be marked with letters between 2 inches and 6 inches high

“limited”, “restricted,” “light-sport,” “experimental,” or “provisional,” near each entrance to 

a cabin, cockpit or pilot station. An exemption may be needed as the UAS will have no 

entrance to the cabin, cockpit or pilot station on which the word “Experimental” can be 

placed. Given the size of the UAS, 2 inch lettering may be impossible. All aircraft will be 

registered and marked per the requirements of applicable CFR (14 CFR Part 47).

14 CFR Part 47: sUA and UA registration (no exception required)

An original AC Form 8050-1 will be used to register each aircraft. All aircraft will be 

marked per the applicable rules.

14 CFR 61.113(a) & (b): Private pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in command

Sections 61.113(a) and (b) limit private pilots to non-commercial operations. Because the

UAS will not carry a pilot or passengers, the proposed operations can achieve the equivalent 

level of safety of current operations by requiring the pilot operating the aircraft to have 

completed a UAS flight-training course. Unlike a conventional aircraft that carries the pilot 

and passengers, the UAS is remotely controlled. The area of operation is controlled and 

restricted, and all flights are planned and coordinated in advance. The risks associated with 

the operation of the UAS are so diminished from the level of risk associated with 

commercial operations contemplated by Part 61 when drafted, that allowing operations of 

the UAS as requested exceeds the present level of safety achieved by 14 CFR 61.113(a) and 

(b).
Scott Richard Madans Phone: 775-530-6800 Email: Scott@GeneralUAS.com Page 7 of 16

14 CFR 91.7(a): Civil aircraft airworthiness

The regulation requires that no person may operate a civil aircraft unless it is in airworthy

condition. As there will be no airworthiness certificate issued for the aircraft Scott

contemplates operating, should this exemption be granted, no FAA regulatory standard

will exist for determining airworthiness. Given the size of the aircraft and the operational

restrictions put on the aircraft, an equivalent level of safety will be provided.

14 CFR 91.9(b)(2): Civil aircraft flight manual, marking and placard requirements

The UAS, given its size and configuration has no ability or place to carry such a flight

manual on the aircraft, not only because there is no pilot on board, but because there is no

room or capacity to carry such an item on the aircraft. The equivalent level of safety will

be maintained by keeping the Operating Manuals at the ground control point where the

pilot flying the UAS will have immediate access to it.

14 CFR 91.103: Preflight action

This regulation requires each pilot in command take certain actions before flight to

ensure the safety of flight. An exemption is needed from this requirement, as the pilot

will take separate preflight actions, including checking for weather conditions, checking

flight battery or fuel requirements, checking takeoff and landing distances, and all other

actions in the Operating Manual and safety checklists. These actions will provide an

equivalent level of safety.

14 CFR 91.109: Flight instruction

Section 91.103 provides that no person may operate a civil aircraft (except a manned free

balloon) that is being used for flight instruction unless that aircraft has fully functioning

dual controls. By design, UAS do not have fully functional dual controls. Flight control is

accomplished through the use of a control box that communicates with the aircraft via

radio communications. The equivalent level of safety is provided by the fact that neither a

pilot nor passengers will be carried in the aircraft, the ability to control the UAS via radio

signals from the controller and by the size and speed of the aircraft.

14 CFR 91.119: Minimum safe altitudes

Section 91.119 establishes safe altitudes for operation of civil aircraft. The UAS will never 

operate at altitude higher than 400 AGL, or higher than a manufacturer’s specified ceiling, 

and all operations will occur during daylight hours under Visual Meteorological Conditions 

(VMC) only. The equivalent level of safety will be achieved given the size, weight and 

speed of the UAS as well as the location where it is operated. No flight will be taken 

without the permission of the property owner. Because advance notice to the property 

owner and any onsite personnel, as well as the precautions outlined below, all affected 

individuals will be aware of the planned flight operations. 

Flight operations will be conducted at least 500 feet from all non-participating persons

(persons other than the pilot in command (PIC) or visual observer (VO)), vessels, vehicles 

and structures, unless operations do not present an undue hazard. 
Scott Richard Madans Phone: 775-530-6800 Email: Scott@GeneralUAS.com Page 8 of 16

The UAS will remain within visual line of sight of the PIC or VO. Flight operations will be 

conducted at least 5 miles from an airport. The PIC or VO will provide notification to the 

local Flight Standards District Office and airport controller of all operations within 5 miles 

of an airport. The FAA will have advance notice of all operations through the filing of 

notices-to-airmen.

Compared to flight operations with aircraft or rotorcraft weighing far more than the UAS

proposed herein, any risk associated with our operations is far less than those presently

presented with helicopters and other conventional aircraft operating at or below 500 feet

AGL. In addition, the low-altitude operations of the UAS will ensure separation between

these UAS operations and the operations of conventional aircraft that must comply with

Section 91.119.

14 CFR 91.121: Altimeter Settings

This regulation requires each person operating the aircraft to maintain cruising altitude by

reference to an altimeter that is set “...to the elevation of the departure airport or an

appropriate altimeter setting available before departure.” As the UAS may not have a

barometric altimeter, but instead a GPS altitude read out, an exemption may be needed. An 

equivalent level of safety will be achieved by the PIC confirming the altitude of the launch 

site shown on the GPS altitude indicator before flight.

14 CFR 91.151(a): Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions

Section 91.151(a) outlines fuel requirements for beginning a flight in VFR conditions. 

Relief from Section 91.151(a)(1) is requested to the extent required to allow flights of a

variety of UAS during daylight hours in visual flight rules (VFR) conditions to continue

until 90 percent of remaining battery power or fuel reserves remain. Scott seeks the

requested relief because without an exemption from Section 91.151(a)(1), the flight time

duration of the selected aircraft will be reduced and severely constrain the practicality of

any aerial acquisition of data that Scott proposes to conduct pursuant to this Petition.

The technical specifications of the proposed UAS, their Operations Manuals, and

Scott’s proposed operating limitations, ensure that Scott will safely operate the

selected aircraft during daylight hours in VFR conditions until 90 percent of remaining

battery power or fuel reserves remain.

14 CFR 91.203(a) & (b): Carrying civil aircraft certification and registration

The UAS has no cabin, cockpit or pilot station and is operated without an onboard pilot.

Therefore, there is no ability or place to carry certification and registration documents or

to display them on the UAS. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved by keeping

these documents at the ground control point where the pilot flying the UAS will have

immediate access to them, to the extent they are applicable to the UAS.
Scott Richard Madans Phone: 775-530-6800 Email: Scott@GeneralUAS.com Page 9 of 16

14 CFR 91.405(a); 407(a)(1); 409(a)(2); 417(a) & (b): Maintenance inspections

These regulations require that an aircraft operator or owner “shall have that aircraft

inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between required inspections,

except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, have discrepancies repaired as

prescribed in part 43 of this chapter...,” and others shall inspect or maintain the aircraft in

compliance with Part 43.

Given that these sections and Part 43 apply only to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate, 

these sections will not apply to Scott. Maintenance will be accomplished pursuant to the 

User Guide or Operating Manual. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved because 

these UASs are limited in size and will carry a small payload and operate only in restricted 

areas for limited periods of time. If mechanical issues arise, the UAS can land immediately 

and will be operating from no higher than 400 feet AGL. The PIC will ensure that the UAS 

is in working order prior to initiating flight, perform required maintenance and keep a log of 

any maintenance performed. Moreover, the PIC is the person most familiar with the aircraft 

and best suited to maintain the aircraft in an airworthy condition to provide the equivalent 

level of safety.

PUBLIC INTEREST

Approval of exemptions allowing commercial operations of UASs for aerial acquisition of 

data enhances safety while reducing risk. Manned aircraft in certain application such as 

pipeline monitoring create a greater risk because the aircraft are much larger and carry an 

onboard human pilot. In contrast, a UAS weighing 55 pounds or less will carry no

passengers or crew and, therefore, will not expose them to the risks associated with manned 

aircraft flights. In addition, additional streams of aerial data will allow large commercial 

entities to make decisions about how to best deploy ground resources and ensure the safety

and cost-effectiveness of their operations.

EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF SAFETY

Scott proposes that the exemption requested herein apply to civil aircraft that have the

characteristics and that operate within the limitations listed herein. These limitations

provide for at least an equivalent or even higher level of safety to operations under the

current and proposed regulatory structure.

PRIVACY

All flights will occur over private or controlled access property with the property owner’s

prior consent and knowledge. Images or video taken of individuals will have consented to

being filmed or otherwise they will be made anonymous.

NATIONAL SECURITY

Given the small size of the UAS involved and the restricted environment within which

they will operate, our petition presents no national security issue.
Scott Richard Madans Phone: 775-530-6800 Email: Scott@GeneralUAS.com Page 10 of 16

FEDERAL REGISTER SUMMARY

Docket No.: No. FAA-2016-____

Petitioner: Scott Richard Madans

Part 21 and §§ 45.23(b), 61.113(a) and (b), 91.7(a), 91.9(b)(2), 91.103, 91.109, 91.119,

91.121, 91.151(a), 91.203(a) and (b), 91.405(a), 407(a)(1), 409(a)(2), 417(a) and (b) of

Title 14, Code of the Federal Regulations (14 CFR).

Description of Relief Sought: Scott is seeking an exemption to conduct commercial

acquisition of aerial data using unmanned aircraft systems.

Based upon the foregoing, Scott requests that the FAA grant it the necessary

exemptions under Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act as requested herein to allow for

commercial operations of UAS within the United States.

Sincerely,

Scott Richard Madans

Founder, General UAS

5500 Tannerwood Dr

Reno, Nevada 89511 USA
Scott Richard Madans Phone: 775-530-6800 Email: Scott@GeneralUAS.com Page 11 of 16

Appendix - List of UAS aircraft Scott contemplates operating:

1. 2AgEagle

2. 3D Robotics Aero-M 

3. 3D Robotics Iris 

4. 3D Robotics Iris+ 

5. 3D Robotics X8 

6. 3DRobotics Fixed Wing

7. 3DRobotics Multirotor

8. 3DRobotics Quadrotor

9. 3DR Solo

10. 3DR Spektre

11. 3DRobotics Spektre Industrial Multi-Rotor Aerial Vehicle

12. 3D Robotics Solo

13. 3DRobotics X8+ 

14. 3D Robotics X8-M

15. 3D Robotics Y6

16. Aerial Mob Heavy Lifter

17. Aerial Mob Light Lifter 

18. Aerial Remote Mineral Detection System (ARMDS)

19. Aerialtronics Zenith with intergrated Airware system

20. Aerialtronics Altura Zenith ATX8

21. Aerigon

22. Aerobo

23. AeroCine Kopterworx Hammer X12

24. Aeromao AeroMapper 300

25. Aeromao Talon

26. Aeromao Aeromapper 300

27. Aeromao Aeromapper EV-2

28. AeroVironment Shrike 

29. AeroVironment Puma

30. Aeronavics X4 Titanium

31. Aeryon Sky Ranger

32. Aervonics Sky Jib frame with a DJI A2 flight system 

33. Aero-M

34. Aeryon Scout

35. Aeryon SkyRanger

36. AgEagle 

37. AgEagle Robotic

38. AgScout

39. AgScout Mini

40. Agribotix Hornet Drone

41. Agribotix Enduro Quad

42. AgriView VK Ranger EX

43. Aibot

44. Aibotix X-6

45. Air Rover AR-3000

46. AirCover QR-425s

47. AirRobot AR 180

48. AirRobot AR 100

49. AirRobot AR200

50. Air-X

51. Align M690

52. Altavian Nova

53. Altavian Nova F6500 

54. Altavian Nova R8400 

55. Altus X-4
Scott Richard Madans Phone: 775-530-6800 Email: Scott@GeneralUAS.com Page 12 of 16

56. Altus X-8

57. American Drones, LLC Eagle 

58. Apprentice

59. Arch Aerial OCTO multi-rotor UAS

60. Arris hexacoper

61. AR-960 Hex Rotor

62. AR-540 Quad Rotor

63. ARF-MikroKopter OktoXL

64. ARF-MikroKopter OktoXL + 

65. ArrowLite

66. AscTec Falcon

67. AscTec Falcon 8

68. Astraeus Aerial Cinema System V.3CS

69. Atlantic RC Aircraft LC04

70. Auburn Trimble UX5

71. Auburn War Eagle

72. Auburn EasyStar

73. Auburn

74. AV44

75. Bixler 3DR Plane

76. Blade 350QX

77. Bixler 2 

78. Boomerang Carbon Fiber Frame (The Identified System) 

79. Bormatec Maja UAV

80. BOSH Technologies Super Swiper

81. Bumblebee-S

82. C-Astral Bramor gEO

83. CarbonCore Octocopter 1000

84. Carbon Core Cortex Quadcopter

85. CCO w/Wkm M 

86. Chameleon Pro

87. CinesStar 

88. Cinestar 6

89. Cinestar X8

90. Cinestar 8

91. Cinestar 8 HL

92. Cinestar 8 Okto XL 

93. Coaxial Quad Multirotor VAO1-V1

94. Coaxial Quad Multirotor VAO2-V2

95. CopelandRED LLC Delta Wing Aircraft

96. CyberQuad Maxi

97. DJI Flame Wheel F450

98. DJI Flame Wheel F550

99. DAx8

100. DJI Inspire

101. DJI Inspire 1

102. DJI Inspire 2

103. DJI M P330z 

104. DJI Matrice 100

105. DJI Phantom

106. DJI Phantom 1

107. DJI Phantom 2 

108. DJI Phantom 2+

109. DJI Phantom 2 Vision

110. DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ 

111. DJI Phantom Vision + 

112. DJI Phantom 3 

113. DJI Phantom FC40 
Scott Richard Madans Phone: 775-530-6800 Email: Scott@GeneralUAS.com Page 13 of 16

114. DJI Spreading Wings S900 

115. DJI Spreading Wings S1000 

116. DJI Spreading Wings S1000+

117. DJI S800

118. DJI S800 EVO

119. DJI T600

120. Draganflyer Guardian

121. Draganflyer X4ES

122. Draganflyer X4P

123. Draganflyer X6

124. DT-18 

125. DYS D800-X8

126. Eagle VTOL

127. Eagle V2

128. E-Flite Apprentice

129. Event 38 E384

130. F-450

131. Falcon VTOL

132. Fire Fly 6

133. First Aerial Responder UAV

134. Flame Wheel G4 7.8 Skycrane 

135. Flying-Cam 3.0 SARAH

136. Foxtech Kraken 130 V2

137. FreeFly Systems ALTA RTF

138. FreeFly Systems Octocopter Airframe (Legacy)

139. G4

140. G4 models

141. GeoStar 

142. GerMAP G220

143. GerMAP G180

144. goFarm GF-1

145. Gryphon Dynamics X8 

146. GT80X 

147. Harris 18 HL

148. HEFF

149. Helicopters West DJI Inspire

150. Helicopters West SkyJib 8 

151. Helios 960

152. Hawkeye Mk-III 

153. HexaCrafter HC-1100 85

154. HexaCrafter HO-1250

155. HH Blade 350QX2 AP

156. Hobbyking “Bixler” Fixed Wing Trainer

157. HoneyComb AgDrone

158. Horizon Hobby Blade 350 Qx2 quadcopter

159. Hoverfly LiveSky, BigSky 60 and H-Frame

160. Hubsan X4 micro drone 

161. HVP 14301 Multi Rotor

162. Identified System

163. IMT Global xFold Cinema

164. Indago

165. InovalDrone:Inova One

166. InstantEye Mk-2

167. InstantEye Mk-2 Gen2

168. Intuitive Aerial Aeragon

169. K130 Octocopter

170. KongCopter X8

171. Kopterworx Hammer X12
Scott Richard Madans Phone: 775-530-6800 Email: Scott@GeneralUAS.com Page 14 of 16

172. Latitude HQ-4 Hybrid Multirotor

173. LB700 

174. Leading Edge Precision Vision 10

175. Leptron Avenger

176. Lewis Realty Associates Hexacopter 650

177. Liberty 1

178. Lockheed Martin Desert Hawk III

179. Lockheed Martin Indago 

180. Matrix quad copter

181. MaxFlight

182. MD4-200

183. MD4-1000

184. Mikrokopter 2.5

185. MLB Company Super Bat

186. MU-1H 

187. Multirotor G4 7.8 Skycrane

188. Nighthawk

189. Nighthawk VTOL

190. OktoXL 6S12

191. PAG X4

192. Parksone Radian RTF

193. Parrot Bebop drone

194. Parrot PF 725100 Bebop Drone 14MP

195. Parrot Skycontroller

196. Patriot X4

197. Patriot X8

198. Finwing Penguin V2

199. Birdseyeview FireFly 6

200. Phoenix

201. Phoenix VTOL

202. Phoenix 60

203. Phoenix 60LE

204. Pixhawk

205. Precision Drone Pacesetter

206. PrecisionHawk

207. PrecisionHawk Hawkeye Mk-III

208. PrecisionHawk Lancaster

209. Precision Lancaster MK3

210. Prioria Hex

211. Prioria’s Maveric

212. Pulse Aerospace, PA 01 Vapor

213. Pulse Aerospace Pulse Vapor 35 

214. Pulse Vapor

215. Puma AE DDL

216. PV 14817 Multi Rotor

217. PV HL1

218. PV HL2

219. Q1 

220. Quadcopter LLC MikroKopter 

221. Quiet UAV

222. Qube

223. R/C Rotors and Aerial Media: Matrix Prof. Multi Rotor Frame & Octo Heavy Lift Prof. Multi 

Rotor

224. Frame Ronin Edition Microdrones:MD4-1000

225. RCTimer Hexacopter

226. RDASS

227. REHawk 500

228. REHawk 680
Scott Richard Madans Phone: 775-530-6800 Email: Scott@GeneralUAS.com Page 15 of 16

229. RF-70

230. Riegl RiCopter

231. RITEWING Z3 Spade 47”

232. Ritewing Drake 60”

233. RITEWING Z3 Spade 70”

234. RITEWING Z4 Spade 52”

235. RMAX

236. Roboflight

237. Rotomotion SR-15 

238. RV Jet

239. Scout X4

240. SD02

241. Seahawk 1.2 

242. SelectTech Geospacial’s EH-4

243. SenseFly eBee 

244. SenseFly eBee RTK

245. SenseFly eXom

246. Sensurion Magpie MP-1

247. Service-Drone Recon One

248. Service-Drone Blackbird

249. SH 900

250. ShadowHawk 

251. Shrike 

252. Sirius 

253. SkyCatch

254. SkyJib 8 v.2 Heavy Lifter

255. SkyPhilly MI

256. Skywalker Aero

257. Skywalker Flying Wing X8

258. SnapRoll Media SUAS

259. Solutions Phoenix 30

260. SteadiDrone

261. Steadidrone Quad 

262. Steadydrone QU4D 

263. Steadidrone Mavik

264. SuperX/P2 Multirotor

265. Swift Radioplanes Lynx

266. Tali 500

267. Talon 120LE

268. Tarot FY690S Hexacopter

269. Tarot quadcopter

270. Tarot 680pro

271. Tarot 690 

272. Tarot 900

273. Tarot 960

274. Tarot T-15

275. Tarot T15 C/F Folding Octocopter

276. Tarot T18 UAV 

277. Tarot T690

278. Tarot T810 

279. Tarot T960

280. Tarsier Systems MoAC

281. Tayzu Robotics Titan X8

282. TBS Discovery Pro

283. Team Black Sheep Discovery Pro Tarot T15

284. T-Rex 700E F3C 

285. TREX 800E DFC PRO

286. Trimble UX5
Scott Richard Madans Phone: 775-530-6800 Email: Scott@GeneralUAS.com Page 16 of 16

287. Trimble UX5 hp

288. Trimble ZX5

289. Turningy Talon 500

290. TUP X8-800

291. Turbo Ace CINEWING 6

292. TurboAce Matrix-G quadcopter

293. Turbo Ace matrix-E

294. Turbo Ace MATRIX-1

295. UAV Solutions Phoenix 60

296. Universeye Penguin 

297. Unmanned Flying Rolling Orb “UFRO”

298. US2 GreenHawk 

299. UtiliCopter ITX8

300. VA03-v1 

301. VA04-v1 

302. VA07-v1

303. Viking UAS Multicopter (VTOL)

304. Viking UAS FF-X4/X8

305. VK-Patriot X4/X8

306. Viking UAS Patriot X4/X8 Multirotor

307. Viking UAS X6 Model 800

308. Viking UAS Viking ONE

309. VK-450

310. Viking Unmanned Aerial Systems, LLC AgriView VK Ranger EX 

311. Viking VK-FF-X4

312. VK-Ranger EX-SAR Fixed Wing UAS

313. Volantex Raptor Tarot T-18

314. Volt Aerial Robotics Octane

315. Vulcan frame controlled by a DJI A2 flight controller

316. Vulcan Mantis

317. Vulcan Octocopter

318. Vulcan Raven

319. Vulcan UAV 

320. Walkera TALI H500

321. Walkera Scout X4

322. Wookong DJI 5800 

323. xCel Drones XD550CDR

324. XFold Rig with four configurations: Quadcopter, Hexcopter, Octocopter and x12 Copter

325. X8-M