Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 227 / Friday, November 26, 2010 / Notices 72845 

1Notice of United States Postal Service of Filing 

Five Functionally Equivalent Global Expedited 

Package Services 3 Negotiated Service Agreements 

and Application For Non-Public Treatment of 

Materials Filed Under Seal, November 18, 2010 

(Notice). 

2 Docket No. CP2009–50, Order Granting 

Clarification and Adding Global Expedited Package 

Services 2 to the Competitive Product List, August 

28, 2009 (Order No. 290). 

Further information regarding this 

meeting can be obtained by contacting 

Ms. Ilka Berrios, Cognizant ACRS Staff 

(Telephone: 301–415–3179, E-mail: 

Ilka.Berrios@nrc.gov), between 7:30 a.m. 

and 5:15 p.m. (ET). 

Dated: November 22, 2010 

Andrew L. Bates, 

Advisory Committee Management Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2010–29915 Filed 11–24–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[NRC–2010–0362] 

Notice of Availability; NUREG–1307, 

Revision 14, ‘‘Report on Waste Burial 

Charges Changes in Decommissioning 

Waste Disposal Costs at Low-Level 

Waste Burial Facilities’’ 

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice of Availability. 

SUMMARY: The NRC is announcing the 

completion and availability of NUREG– 

1307, Revision 14, ‘‘Report on Waste 

Burial Charges,’’ dated November 2010, 

which updates the cost factor for 

disposal (Bx) that a licensee uses when 

calculating the minimum amount of 

decommissioning funding assurance 

required, based on changes in waste 

disposal charges since the previous 

revision. 

ADDRESSES: NUREG–1307 may be 

purchased from The Superintendent of 

Documents, U.S. Government Printing 

Office, P.O. Box 37082, Washington, DC 

20402–9328: http:// 

www.access.gop.gov/sudocs: 202–512– 

1800; or The National Technical 

Information Service, Springfield, 

Virginia 22161–0002; http:// 

www.ntis.gov; or locally, 703–605–6000. 

The publication may be viewed 

electronically on the public computers 

located at the NRC’s Public Document 

Room (PDR), One White Flint North, 

11555 Rockville Pike, Room O1–F21, 

Rockville, Maryland. The PDR 

reproduction contractor will copy 

documents for a fee. The public can gain 

entry into the NRC’s Agencywide 

Documents Access and Management 

System (ADAMS) through the agency’s 

public Web site at http://www.nrc.gov. 

This Web site provides text and image 

files of the NRC’s public documents. If 

you do not have access to ADAMS or if 

there are problems in accessing the 

documents located in ADAMS, contact 

the NRC PDR Reference Staff at 1–800– 

397–4209, 301–415–4737 or by e-mail to 

pdr@nrc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Clayton L. Pittiglio, Office of Nuclear 

Reactor Regulation, Division of Policy 

and Rulemaking, U.S. Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission, Washington, 

DC 20555, telephone (301) 415–1435, email Clayton.Pittiglio@nrc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A 

requirement placed upon nuclear power 

reactor licensees by the NRC is that 

licensees must annually adjust the 

estimate of the cost of decommissioning 

their plants, in dollars of the current 

year, as part of the process to provide 

reasonable assurance that adequate 

funds for decommissioning will be 

available when needed. This report, 

which is revised periodically, explains 

the formula that is acceptable to the 

NRC for determining the minimum 

decommissioning fund requirements for 

nuclear power plants. The sources of 

information used in the formula are 

identified, and the values developed for 

the estimation of radioactive waste 

burial/disposition costs, by site and by 

year, are given. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, November 

15, 2010. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission 

Theodore R. Quay, 

Deputy Director, Division of Policy and 

Rulemaking, Office of Nuclear Reactor 

Program. 

[FR Doc. 2010–29760 Filed 11–24–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION 

[Docket Nos. CP2011–34 through CP2011– 

38; Order No. 591] 

New Postal Product 

AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a 

recently-filed Postal Service request to 

add five Global Expedited Package 

Services 3 contracts to the competitive 

product list. This notice addresses 

procedural steps associated with the 

filing. 

DATES: Comments are due: November 

30, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments 

electronically via the Commission’s 

Filing Online system at http:// 

www.prc.gov. Commenters who cannot 

submit comments electronically should 

contact the person identified in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section 

for advice on filing alternatives. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel, 

at stephen.sharfman@prc.gov or 202– 

789–6824. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents 

I. Introduction 

II. Notice of Filing 

III. Ordering Paragraphs 

I. Introduction 

On November 18, 2010, the Postal 

Service filed a notice announcing that it 

has entered into five additional Global 

Expedited Package Services 3 (GEPS 3) 

contracts.1 The Postal Service believes 

the instant contracts are functionally 

equivalent to previously submitted 

GEPS contracts, and are supported by 

Governors’ Decision No. 08–7, attached 

to the Notice and originally filed in 

Docket No. CP2008–4. Id. at 1, 

Attachment 3. The Notice explains that 

Order No. 86, which established GEPS 

1 as a product, also authorized 

functionally equivalent agreements to be 

included within the product, provided 

that they meet the requirements of 39 

U.S.C. 3633. Id. at 2. In Order No. 290, 

the Commission approved the GEPS 2 

product.2 In Order No. 503, the 

Commission approved the GEPS 3 

product. Additionally, the Postal 

Service requested to have the contract in 

Docket No. CP2010–71 serve as the 

baseline contract for future functional 

equivalence analyses of the GEPS 3 

product. 

The instant contracts. The Postal 

Service filed the instant contracts 

pursuant to 39 CFR 3015.5. In addition, 

the Postal Service contends that each 

contract is in accordance with Order No. 

86. The term of each contract is one year 

from the date the Postal Service notifies 

the customer that all necessary 

regulatory approvals have been 

received. Notice at 3. 

In support of its Notice, the Postal 

Service filed four attachments as 

follows: 

• Attachments 1A through 1E— 

redacted copies of the five contracts and 

applicable annexes; 

• Attachments 2A through 2E— 

certified statements required by 39 CFR 

3015.5(c)(2) for each contract; 

• Attachment 3—a redacted copy of 

Governors’ Decision No. 08–7 which 

establishes prices and classifications for 

GEPS contracts, a description of 

applicable GEPS contracts, formulas for 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
72846 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 227 / Friday, November 26, 2010 / Notices 

1Request of the United States Postal Service to 

Add Parcel Return Service Contract 2 to the 

Competitive Product List and Notice of Filing 

(Under Seal) of Contract and Supporting Data, 

November 17, 2010 (Request). 

2The contract for Parcel Return Service Contract 

1 originally was set to expire on November 7, 2010. 

In Order No. 576, the Commission granted the 

Postal Service’s Motion for Temporary Relief 

allowing the contract to remain in effect until 

November 30, 2010, based on the expectation that 

the Postal Service would file the successor contract 

by November 5, 2010. See Docket Nos. MC2009–1 

and CP2009–1, Motion of the United States Postal 

Service for Temporary Relief, November 3, 2010, at 

2, n.1. By this Order, the Commission extends the 

effective date until December 31, 2010. 

prices, an analysis of the formulas, and 

certification of the Governors’ vote; and 

• Attachment 4—an application for 

non-public treatment of materials to 

maintain redacted portions of the 

contracts and supporting documents 

under seal. 

The Notice advances reasons why the 

instant GEPS 3 contracts fit within the 

Mail Classification Schedule language 

for the GEPS 3 product. The Postal 

Service identifies customer-specific 

information and general contract terms 

that distinguish the instant contracts 

from the baseline GEPS 3 agreement. Id. 

at 4–5. It states that the differences, 

which include price variations based on 

updated costing information and 

volume commitments, do not alter the 

contracts’ functional equivalency. Id. at 

3–4. The Postal Service asserts that 

‘‘[b]ecause the agreements incorporate 

the same cost attributes and 

methodology, the relevant 

characteristics of these five GEPS 

contracts are similar, if not the same, as 

the relevant characteristics of previously 

filed contracts.’’ Id. at 4. 

The Postal Service concludes that its 

filings demonstrate that each of the new 

GEPS 3 contracts complies with the 

requirements of 39 U.S.C. 3633 and is 

functionally equivalent to the baseline 

GEPS 3 contract. Therefore, it requests 

that the instant contracts be included 

within the GEPS 3 product. Id. at 5. 

II. Notice of Filing 

The Commission establishes Docket 

Nos. CP2011–34 through CP2011–38 for 

consideration of matters related to the 

contracts identified in the Postal 

Service’s Notice. 

These dockets are addressed on a 

consolidated basis for purposes of this 

Order. Filings with respect to a 

particular contract should be filed in 

that docket. 

Interested persons may submit 

comments on whether the Postal 

Service’s contracts are consistent with 

the policies of 39 U.S.C. 3632, 3633, or 

3642. Comments are due no later than 

November 30, 2010. The public portions 

of these filings can be accessed via the 

Commission’s Web site (http:// 

www.prc.gov). 

The Commission appoints Paul L. 

Harrington to serve as Public 

Representative in the captioned 

proceedings. 

III. Ordering Paragraphs 

It is ordered: 

1. The Commission establishes Docket 

Nos. CP2011–28 through CP2011–32 for 

consideration of matters raised by the 

Postal Service’s Notice. 

2. Comments by interested persons in 

these proceedings are due no later than 

November 30, 2010. 

3. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Paul L. 

Harrington is appointed to serve as the 

officer of the Commission (Public 

Representative) to represent the 

interests of the general public in these 

dockets. 

4. The Secretary shall arrange for 

publication of this order in the Federal 

Register. 

By the Commission. 

Ruth Ann Abrams, 

Acting Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2010–29734 Filed 11–24–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION 

[Docket Nos. MC2011–6 and CP2011–33; 

Order No. 592] 

New Postal Product 

AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a 

recently-filed Postal Service request to 

add Parcel Return Service Contract 2 to 

the competitive product list. This notice 

addresses procedural steps associated 

with this filing. 

DATES: Comments are due: November 

30, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments 

electronically via the Commission’s 

Filing Online system at http:// 

www.prc.gov. Commenters who cannot 

submit their views electronically should 

contact the person identified in FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by 

telephone for advice on alternatives to 

electronic filing. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel, 

stephen.sharfman@prc.gov or 202–789– 

6820. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents 

I. Introduction 

II. Notice of Filing 

III. Ordering Paragraphs 

I. Introduction 

Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 39 

CFR 3020.30 et seq., the Postal Service 

filed a formal request and associated 

supporting information to add Parcel 

Return Service Contract 2 to the 

competitive product list.1 The Postal 

Service asserts that Parcel Return 

Service Contract 2 is a competitive 

product ‘‘not of general applicability’’ 

within the meaning of 39 U.S.C. 

3632(b)(3). Id. at 1. The Postal Service 

states that prices and classifications 

underlying this contract are supported 

by Governors’ Decision No. 10–5. Id. 

The Request has been assigned Docket 

No. MC2011–6. 

The Postal Service 

contemporaneously filed a contract 

related to the proposed new product 

pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3632(b)(3) and 39 

CFR 3015.5. The Postal Service states 

that the instant contract is the successor 

contract for the Parcel Return Service 

Contract 1 product in Docket Nos. 

MC2009–1 and CP2009–2.2 The contract 

has been assigned Docket No. CP2011– 

33. 

Request. In support of its Request, the 

Postal Service filed six attachments as 

follows: 

• Attachment A—a redacted copy of 

Governors’ Decision No. 10–5, 

authorizing Parcel Return Service; 

• Attachment B—a redacted copy of 

the contract; 

• Attachment C—a proposed change 

in the Mail Classification Schedule 

competitive product list; 

• Attachment D—a Statement of 

Supporting Justification as required by 

39 CFR 3020.32; 

• Attachment E—a certification of 

compliance with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a); and 

• Attachment F—an application for 

non-public treatment of materials to 

maintain redacted portions of the 

contract and supporting documents 

under seal. 

In the Statement of Supporting 

Justification, Daniel J. Barrett, Manager, 

Return Solutions, Shipping Services, 

asserts that the service to be provided 

under the contract will cover its 

attributable costs, make a positive 

contribution to institutional costs, and 

increase contribution toward the 

requisite 5.5 percent of the Postal 

Service’s total institutional costs. 

Request, Attachment D. Thus, Mr. 

Barrett contends there will be no issue 

of subsidization of competitive products 

by market dominant products as a result 

of this contract. Id. 

A redacted version of the specific 

Parcel Return Service Contract 2 is 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES