alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-07-14T20:16:27-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
#### David Myers III et al., Appellants-Respondents, v BMR Building Inspections, Inc., Defendant, and Bart Rodi, P.E., et al., Respondents-Appellants.

[814 NYS2d 686]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Bergerman, J.), dated October 4, 2004, as corrected by order of the same court, dated October 25, 2004, as, upon converting the motion of the defendants Bart Rodi EE. and Bart Rodi, pursuant to CFLR 3211 to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them, to one for summary judgment, granted those branches of their motion which were to dismiss the first, second, third, and sixth causes of action insofar as asserted against those defendants, and the defendants Bart Rodi EE. and Bart Rodi cross-appeal from so much of the same order as denied that branch of their motion which was to dismiss the fifth cause of action insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order, as corrected, is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, the Supreme Court properly converted the motion to dismiss the complaint to one for summary judgment because the parties made “it unequivocally clear that they [were] laying bare their proof and deliberately charting a summary judgment course” *(Jamison v Jamison,*18 AD3d 710, 711 [2005] [internal quotation marks omitted]; *see Four Seasons Hotels v Vinnik,*127 AD2d 310, 320 [1987]; *Dunn v B&H Assoc.,*295 AD2d 396, 397 [2002]).

Furthermore, the defendants Bart Rodi, EE., and Bart Rodi were entitled to summary judgment dismissing the first, second, and third causes of action insofar as asserted against them since those defendants acted as corporate representatives and not in their individual capacity *(see Solow v New N. Brokerage Facilities,*255 AD2d 198 [1998]).

The parties’ remaining contentions are without merit. Miller, J.P., Santucci, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.
#### §§ 3560.580-3560.599 [Reserved]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2207 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2207

  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain manufacturing 
                               equipment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 30, 2006

  Mr. DeMint introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain manufacturing 
                               equipment.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN MANUFACTURING EQUIPMENT.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.84.81 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain manufacturing 
equipment) is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/
2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 3300.25 Application for renewal of approval.

If an organization wishes to have an approval renewed at the end of a 5-year period, it shall submit a request for renewal to the Administrator 90 days before expiration of the existing approval. The request for renewal shall contain the same type of information as required in the original application, that is, the information called for in § 3300.19 of subpart C.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Chardan South China Acquisition
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006
(the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Dr. Richard D. Propper, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1....The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2....The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Richard D. Propper                                   Dated: May 19, 2006
----------------------------------------------
Dr. Richard D. Propper Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Council on Disability

# Dates and Times

December 2, 2010, 9 a.m.-5 p.m. Eastern.

# December 3, 2010, 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m. Eastern.

*Place:*                         Access Board, 1331 F Street, NW., Room 800, Washington, DC 20004.                    

# Status:

This meeting will be open to the public.

## Matters To Be Considered 

## December 2

9 a.m.-9:30 a.m. Welcome and Introductions

9:30 a.m.-1 p.m. Strategic Planning

1 p.m.-3 p.m. Forum Planning

3 p.m.-5 p.m. Report and Discussion on Health Care Reform Working Group

## December 3

8:30 a.m.-9:30 a.m. To Be Determined

9:30 a.m.-2 p.m. NCD Board Attends State Department Event (off-site—not open to the public)

2:30 p.m.-5 p.m. Open Business

# Accommodations: 

Those needing reasonable accommodations should notify NCD immediately.

# Contact Person For More Information: 

Mark Quigley, Director of Communications, NCD, 1331 F Street, NW., Suite 850, Washington, DC 20004; 202-272-2004, 202-272-2074 (TTY).

Dated: November 9, 2010.

Joan M. Durocher,

Executive Director (Interim).

[FR Doc. 2010-28647 Filed 11-19-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6820-MA-P
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JULIET COTTON,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 4:03-CV-353-SPM

WARDEN JOSE VASQUEZ, et al.,

Defendants.

________________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

AND DISMISSING CASE

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the magistrate judge's report

and recommendation (doc. 38) dated March 8, 2005. The parties have been

furnished a copy and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections. 

Plaintiff was awarded additional time in which to file both her objections to the

report and her response to Defendants’ motion to dismiss. Plaintiff has filed

nothing to date. 

Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), I have

determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is

Case 4:03-cv-00353-SPM-AK Document 43 Filed 04/26/05 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

4:03-CV-360-SPM/AK

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 38) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (doc. 35) is hereby granted.

3. Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction (doc. 19) is hereby

denied.

4. This case is dismissed.

DONE AND ORDERED this twenty-sixth day of April, 2005.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

/pao

Case 4:03-cv-00353-SPM-AK Document 43 Filed 04/26/05 Page 2 of 2
#### Margaret M. Shea et al., Respondents, v. Clesto Auto Service, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered January 19,1966, reversed on the facts, and new trial granted as between *574the plaintiffs Shea and appellant, with costs to abide the event, unless, within 30 days after entry of the order hereon, the female plaintiff shall serve and file a written stipulation consenting to reduce the amount of the verdict in her favor from $20,000 to $12,000 and to the entry of an amended judgment accordingly, in which event the judgment, as so reduced and amended, is affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the verdict as to the female plaintiff was excessive to the extent indicated. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta and Benjamin, JJ., concur; Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm the judgment.
EXHIBIT 32.2



November 10, 2005

Securities and Exchange
Commission

100 F Street, NE

Washington, DC 20549



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Lazard Group
LLC (the Registrant) hereby certifies that the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                    
|/s/  Michael J. Castellano                                          
|Michael J. Castellano                                               
|Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

98-1271.

#### State ex rel. McCracken v. Grand Manor, Inc.

Franklin App. No. 97APD06-828. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. On September 16, 1998, appellant filed a merit brief that does not contain a copy of the judgment or order from which the appeal is taken as required by S.Ct.Prac.R. VI(l)(B)(5)(b). Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that appellant’s merit brief be, and hereby is, stricken.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #12389 and #12390]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania dated 11/15/2010. *Incident:*
                         Severe Storms and Flooding. *Incident Period:*
                         09/30/2010. *Effective Date:*
                         11/15/2010. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         01/14/2011. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         08/15/2011.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Delaware. *Contiguous Counties:*
                     Pennsylvania: Chester, Montgomery, Philadelphia. Delaware: New Castle. New Jersey: Gloucester. *The Interest Rates are:* PercentFor Physical Damage:Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
5.000Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
6.000Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
3.625Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000For Economic Injury:Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 12389 6 and for economic injury is 12390 0. The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are Pennsylvania; Delaware; New Jersey. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Dated: November 15, 2010. Karen G. Mills, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2010-29484 Filed 11-22-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### § 2811.1 General statement.

This part is issued in accordance with 7 CFR 1.3 of the Department of Agriculture regulations governing the availability of records (7 CFR 1.1-1.23 and Appendix A) under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552. The Department's regulations, as supplemented by the regulations in this part, provide guidance for any person wishing to request records from Office of Operations.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

STEPHEN MALLET,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 4:20cv294-MW/HTC

MARK S. INCH,

Respondent.

_________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and 

Recommendation, ECF No. 5, and has also reviewed de novo Petitioner’s objections 

to the report and recommendation, ECF No. 6. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted, over Petitioner’s 

objections, as this Court’s opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “The 

petition, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED under Habeas Rule 4. A Certificate of 

Appealability is DENIED.” The Clerk shall also close the file. 

SO ORDERED on July 22, 2020.

s/ MARK E. WALKER

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00294-MW-HTC Document 7 Filed 07/23/20 Page 1 of 1
#### § 210.28 Pilot project exemptions.

Those State agencies or school food authorities selected for the pilot projects mandated under section 18(d) of the Act may be exempted by the Department from some or all of the counting and free and reduced price application requirements of this part and 7 CFR part 245, as necessary, to conduct an approved pilot project. Additionally, those schools selected for pilot projects that also operate the School Breakfast Program (7 CFR part 220) and/or the Special Milk Program for Children (7 CFR part 215), may be exempted from the counting and free and reduced price application requirements mandated under these Programs. The Department shall notify the appropriate State agencies and school food authorities of its determination of which requirements are exempted after the Department's selection of pilot projects.

[55 FR 41504, Oct. 12, 1990. Redesignated at 56 FR 32948, July 17, 1991, And further redesignated at 64 FR 50741, Sept. 20, 1999]
EXHIBIT 10.47

                               LEASE AMENDMENT # 2
                               -------------------

         Agreement, made as of the 21st day of June 2001, by and between Newtown
Street Road Associates, a Pennsylvania Limited Partnership, having its principal
place of business at Two Bala Plaza Office Building, Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania.
("Landlord") and Medstaff, Inc. doing business in the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania and having its executive offices at The Medstaff Building, 297
South Newtown Street Road. Newtown Square, Pennsylvania ("Tenant").

                                   WITNESSETH
                                   ----------

         WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant have entered into a lease for the entire
building known as The Medstaff Building, 297 South Newtown Street Road, Newtown
Square, Pennsylvania, which lease commenced August l, 1998, and expires July 30,
2004, and which lease was extended under an Amendment #1 dated December 22,
1999, for three months beginning August 1, 2004, to October 31, 2004.

         WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant desire to extend this lease and its
amendments in the respects hereinafter set forth.

         NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency whereof are hereby
acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties hereto agree
as follows:

1. Landlord and Tenant hereby agree to extend the term of this lease beginning
November 1, 2004, and extending until July 31, 2006.

2. Tenant agrees to pay monthly base rent on the first day of each month without
prior notice or demand pursuant to the following Rent Schedule during the
extension period.


                  Period                             Monthly Payment
                  -------                            ---------------
                  11/01/04-7/31/05                   $30,049.99
                  8/01/05-7/31/06                    $30,951.49

3. Tenant shall pay directly to Peco for Tenant's consumption of electric
utilities as separately metered by Peco in Tenant's name.

4. Tenant shall provide janitorial services including light bulb replacement,
walkway salt /snow shoveling, toilet plunging, and exterior trash pick-up during
the term of the Lease.

5. Except as expressly modified by this Agreement, the Lease is hereby ratified,
confirmed, and continued in full force and effect.

6. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties
hereto and their respective heirs, executors, legal representatives, successors,
and assigns.

<PAGE>

7. Landlord, at its own expense will improve common area bathrooms with new
fixtures, cabinets, paint, to bring to a new fresh appearance.


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this
Agreement as of the day and year first written above.

        Newtown Street Road Associates               Medstaff, Inc.


        By: /s/ Arthur Kania                         By: /s/ William Davis
            -----------------------                  ---------------------
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 

v. Case No. 3:20cr35-TKW

PHILIP H. LY

_____________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11,

Fed. R. Crim. P., and has entered a plea of guilty to Counts One and Two of the

Indictment. After cautioning and examining the Defendant under oath concerning

each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined the guilty plea was

knowing and voluntary and the offense charged is supported by an independent

basis in fact containing each of the essential elements thereof. I therefore

recommend the plea of guilty be accepted and the Defendant be adjudicated guilty

and have sentence imposed accordingly.

Dated: August 3, 2020.

/s/ Charles J. Kahn, Jr. 

CHARLES J. KAHN, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:20-cr-00035-TKW Document 117 Filed 08/03/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Objections to these proposed findings and recommendations may be

filed within twenty-four (24) hours after being served a copy thereof. Any

different deadline that may appear on the electronic docket is for the court=s

internal use only and does not control. A copy of objections shall be served

upon the magistrate judge and all other parties. A party failing to object to a

magistrate judge’s findings or recommendations contained in a report and

recommendation in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)

waives the right to challenge on appeal the district court’s order based on

unobjected-to factual and legal conclusions. See U.S. Ct. of App. 11th Cir.

Rule 3-1; 28 U.S.C. ' 636.

Case No.: 3:20cr35-TKW

Case 3:20-cr-00035-TKW Document 117 Filed 08/03/20 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit
32.2





Certification of Principal
Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of SRKP 3, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Anthony C. Pintsopoulos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Anthony C. PintsopoulosAnthony
      C. PintsopoulosPrincipal
      Financial OfficerApril
      21, 2010
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: DISCLOSURE OF PRESENTENCE

REPORTS IN CONNECTION WITH CASE NO.:__________________

SENTENCING GUIDELINES AMENDMENT 750

 /

GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER AUTHORIZING DISCLOSURE

OF PRESENTENCE REPORTS IN CONNECTION WITH

SENTENCING GUIDELINES AMENDMENT 750

For any defendant who is or may be eligible for a sentence reduction under United

States Sentencing Guidelines Amendment 750, the probation office is authorized to

provide a copy of the presentence report to the attorney for the government, for purposes

of a public safety analysis, subject to restrictions on use and copying analogous to those

that apply in original criminal proceedings. To the extent an attorney of record for the

defendant (including the federal defender’s office) requests a copy of the presentence

report from the probation office for use in connection with Amendment 750, such request

should be made to the presiding judge for authorization.

SO ORDERED this 4th day of October, 2011.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:95-mc-40111-DJ Document 143 Filed 10/04/11 Page 1 of 1
#### § 1260.103 Board.

*Board* means the Cattlemen's Beef Promotion and Research Board established pursuant to the Act and this subpart.