In The Matter Of: 

SERVED: JUNE 21,2013 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

Docket No. OST-2013-0065 

LOCAIR, INC., BRIAN L. HALL, 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

RORY C. CREWS, and PEDRO E. BAEZ (Enforcement Proceeding) 

Respondents 

ORDER SETTING RULE 22 PREHEARING CONFERENCE, 

AND DIRECTING LITIGATION PLANNING MEETING AND 

SUBMISSION OF PROPOSED LITIGATION PLAN 

1) Rule 22 Pre hearing Conference: 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 302.22, the parties shall appear by telephone on Wednesday, 

August 7, 2013, at 1:30 p.m. Eastern time for a Rule 22 Prehearing Conference. During the 

Prehearing Conference the parties will discuss the issues in dispute, their proposed joint litigation 

plan (see paragraph 2 infra), and respond to any questions regarding disagreements not resolved 

in the proposed plan. Prior to the Rule 22 Prehearing Conference, the Office of Hearings will 

contact each party to provide a conference call-in number and passcode. 

2) Parties' Litigation Planning Meeting and Submission of Proposed Litigation Plan: 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §§ 302.22 and 302.17,prior to convening with the Judge for the 

Rule 22 Prehearing Conference, the pmiies shall privately conduct a litigation planning meeting 

and prepare a proposed joint litigation plan, which must be completed and filed with the 

undersigned Judge on or before Wednesday, July 31, 2013 (i.e. seven (7) calendar days before 

the Conference). 
ORDER SETTING A RULE 22 PREHEARING CONFERENCE 

Page 2 of 3 

The attorneys of record and all unrepresented parties are jointly responsible for arranging 

the litigation planning meeting and attempting in good faith to agree on the proposed joint 

litigation plan. 

The parties' litigation planning meeting should include discussion of matters identified in 

14 C.P.R.§ 302.22(a)(l)-(8), as well as any other matters that would aid in the conduct and 

disposition of the proceeding. For exan1ple, there should be a good faith discussion about the 

issues, the nature and basis of each party's claims, whether pleadings need to be amended, the 

possibility of resolving all or part of the case, the scope and type of discovery (e.g., production of 

documents, requests for admission, stipulations regarding evidence or documentary exhibits 

(including rebuttal exhibits), electronic exchange of materials, etc.), the schedule for exchanging 

discovery, as well as the date and place of venue for hearing. The parties should also discuss the 

estimated length of the hearing and the preferred hearing procedures. 

The deadlines in the parties' proposed litigation plan should be mutually agreeable, with 

a view to achieving case resolution with a minimum of expense and delay. Any unresolved 

litigation disputes should be clearly identified in the proposed plan, so that these disputes may be 

addressed by the Judge during the Rule 22 Litigation Conference. 

3) Filing with the Judge: 

In addition to filing the proposed joint litigation plan with the U.S. Depmiment of 

Transportation Dockets under 14 C.F .R. § 302.3, the parties shall file a copy of the joint 

litigation plan, and all future documents filed in this proceeding, with the undersigned 

Judge at the Office of Hearings by fax (202-366-7536), express mail, or personal delivery. 

The certificate of service should reflect the manner of service. 
ORDER SETTING A RULE 22 PREHEARING CONFERENCE 

Page 3 of 3 

4) Conflicts with the Rule 22 Prehearing Conference Date: 

If a pmiy has an unavoidable conflict with the date/time of the Rule 22 Pre hearing 

Conference set in (paragraph 1 supra), and wishes to modify the date/time, the requesting party 

shall confer with the opposing party to determine at least three (3) mutually agreeable, 

alternative dates/times. The requesting party shall then contact the Office of Hearings at 

202-366-6941 with the agreed, proposed dates/times for the Judge's consideration. 

Attachment: Service List 
Docket No. OST-2013-0065 

(Enforcement Proceeding) 

SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

U.S. Depmiment of Transportation 

Dockets Operations, M-30 

West Building, Ground Floor 

Room W12-10 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

ONE COPY 

Clereece Kroha, Complainant's Counsel 

Senior Trial Attorney, Office of Aviation 

Enforcement and Proceedings, C-70 

U.S. Department ofTranspmiation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (W96-472) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-9041 

Samuel Podberesky, Esq. 

Assistant General Counselfor 

Aviation and Enforcement Proceedings 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Judge J. E. Sullivan 

US. Administrative Lmv Judge 

U.S. Department ofTranspmiation 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

1200New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Locair, Inc., Respondent 

c/o Roger E. Baez 

27700 SW 164 Ave. 

Homestead, FL 33031 

Brian L. Hall, Respondent 

ChiefExecutive Officer, Locair, Inc. 

c/o Roger E. Baez 

27700 SW 164 Ave. 

Homestead, FL 33031 

Rory C. Crews, Respondent 

President, Locair, Inc. 

c/o Roger E. Baez 

27700 SW 164 Ave. 

Homestead, FL 33031 

Pedro E. Baez, Respondent & Agent for 

Service 

Vice President, Locair, Inc. 

27700 SW 164 Ave. 

Homestead, FL 33031 

TEL: 305-283-5468