alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Alejandro Gonzalez, Respondent, v Ormont Machine Corp., Appellant. (And Third-, Fourth-, Fifth-, and Sixth-Party Actions.)

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 26, 1979, as, upon reargument, adhered to its original determination denying the defendant’s application to compel .plaintiff to submit to a further physical examination by a certain physician, Dr. Lawrence Kaplan. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements, order dated August 15, 1979 vacated, and motion to compel *634plaintiff to submit to a further physical examination by Dr. Kaplan granted. The examination s'jiall proceed at a time and place to be fixed in a written notice of not less than 10 days, to be given by defendant, or at such other time and place as the parties may agree. The defendant shall supply an interpreter and plaintiff may bring his own interpreter, if he be so advised. This case involves serious injuries with resulting permanent disability' The specialist who conducted the examination of the plaintiff recommended that the plaintiff be further examined by a neuropsychiatrist. The defendant located a physician with the necessary subspecialties but the plaintiff refused to submit to a further examination. We believe that sufficient reason has been shown to require a further examination of the plaintiff (see *Goldman v Linkoff,*45 AD2d 709). Any difficulty which may result from the proposed physician’s lack of fluency in Spanish will be minimized by the presence of an interpreter. Damiani, J. P., Lazer, Mangano and Cohalan, JJ., concur. ,
Title: Selected field and analytical methods and analytical results in the Dutch Flats area,

western Nebraska, 1995-99

Author(s): Verstraeten, I.M., Steele, G.V., Bohlke, J.K., Kraemer, T.E., Cannia, J.C.,

Hitch, D.E., Wilson, K.E., and Carnes, A.E.

Publishing Organization: U.S. Geological Survey

Publication Series and Number: Open-File Report OF-2000-413

Publication Date: 2001

Map Scale: 1:158,000

Cross Section: None

Northernmost Latitude: 42° 8'42"N (42.1450)

Southernmost Latitude: 41°54' 4"N (41.9010)

Easternmost Longitude: 103°46'37"W (-103.7770)

Westernmost Longitude: 104° 3' 4"W (-104.0510)

Publication Format: Digital and Paper

Online:

 View the publication from the USGS Publications Warehouse

This Product Is Available, Please note the

publication series and number, and then

contact: U.S. Geological Survey

Postal Address:

USGS Information Services

Box 25286

Denver, CO 80225

Voice Telephone: (303) 202-4700 or 1-888-ASK-USGS

Facsimile Telephone: (303) 202-4693

If any fields in this record

contain errors, please send us

your

Has this record

been

U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA, USA

URL https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/ngmdb/ngm_catalog.ora.html

Database project personnel.

Last modified: 31-Oct-2011

Product Description Page http://ngmdb.usgs.gov/Prodesc/proddesc_43096.htm

1 of 1 10/31/2011 2:35 PM
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2224 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2224

 To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of entries of certain 
                          mold press machines.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 30, 2006

  Mr. DeMint introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for the liquidation or reliquidation of entries of certain 
                          mold press machines.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN MOLD PRESS MACHINES ENTERED ON OR AFTER MAY 11, 
              1997, AND BEFORE OCTOBER 21, 1998.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding sections 514 and 520 of the Tariff 
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1514 and 1520) or any other provision of law, 
not later than 90 days after the receipt of the request described in 
subsection (b), any article--
            (1) that was entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
        consumption--
                    (A) on or after May 11, 1997; and
                    (B) before October 21, 1998; and
            (2) with respect to which heading 9902.84.89 of the 
        Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States would have 
        applied if such article had been entered, or withdrawn from 
        warehouse for consumption, on December 31, 2001,
shall be liquidated or reliquidated as if such heading 9902.84.89 
applied to such entry or withdrawal, and the Secretary of the Treasury 
shall refund any excess duty paid with respect to such entry.
    (b) Requests.--Liquidation or reliquidation may be made under 
subsection (a) with respect to any entry only if a request therefor is 
filed with the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection of the 
Department of Homeland Security, not later than 180 days after the date 
of the enactment of this Act, that contains sufficient information to 
enable the Bureau of Customs and Border Protection--
            (1) to locate the entry; or
            (2) to reconstruct the entry if it cannot be located.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Eugene Curran, Appellant.

Order unanimously reversed and matter remitted to Monroe County Court for a hearing. Memorandum: The petitioner alleges among other things that he was legally insane at the time of his plea of guilty on November 12, 1957. In support of this claim, he alleges that in 1956 he was a patient in the psychopathic ward of the Monroe County Hospital; that while serving his sentence in Attica he was transferred to Dannemora State Hospital, and when returned to Attica was placed under psychiatric supervision. These allegations are not denied or refuted, therefore he is entitled to a hearing and an opportunity to present his proof *(People*v. *Drake,*15 N Y 2d 626). (Appeal from order of Monroe County Court denying, without a hearing, motion to vacate a judgment of conviction for grand larceny, first degree, rendered November 12, 1957.) Present — Williams, P. J., Goldman, Henry, Del Veechio and Marsh, JJ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCTS

Case No. 3:19md2885

LIABILITY LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

Estes, 7:20cv137

Hacker, 7:20cv131

Keefer, 7:20cv104

Judge M. Casey Rodgers

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones

DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS ORDER NO. 2

This Order addresses the Defendants’ objections and counter-designations to 

Plaintiffs’ affirmative deposition designations and Plaintiffs’ objections to 

Defendants’ counter-designations thereto for the following witness depositions: 

1. Mike Cimino (2019-12-11)

2. Richard Knauer (2019-12-17)

3. Tim McNamara (2020-03-11)

4. Martin Salon (2020-01-29)

5. Robert Zielinski (2020-06-22)

The Court’s rulings with respect to the above depositions are set forth in the 

attached Exhibit 1. 

SO ORDERED, on this 18th day of March, 2021.

M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-30048 Summary Calendar

CARL J. BRIGGS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus STATE OF LOUISIANA, Through DOC, as Supervising Agency for Hunt Correctional Center, Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana USDC No. 94-CV-2575-B-1

- - - - - - - - - - July 1, 1996 Before REAVLEY, SMITH and PARKER, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM: * Carl J. Briggs appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment, dismissing his claim filed pursuant to the Americans with Disability Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 12101-117. Briggs contends that the ability to restrain inmates is not an essential function of a corrections officer and that appellee failed to make a reasonable accommodation. We have reviewed the record andNo. 96-30048 - 2 - find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. See Briggs v. State of Louisiana , No. 94-CV-2575-B-1 (M.D. La. Sept. 6, 1995).
AFFIRMED.
#### Michael Florence et al., Doing Business as National Record Plan, Respondents, v Merchants Central Alarm Co., Inc., Appellant.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered November 3, 1978, which denied defendant-appellant’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the motion for summary judgment is granted limiting defendant’s liability to $50, and judgment may be entered for that amount, with interest, and without costs and disbursements. Plaintiffs entered into an agreement with defendant Merchants whereby the latter installed a police alarm transmitter to be connected to a burglar alarm system furnished by another entity not a party to the action. The agreement *870provided that defendant’s liability was limited to $50 as liquidated damages, in the event the system failed to work properly. Thereafter, the system malfunctioned and a burglary occurred, as a result of which plaintiffs suffered substantial loss. This suit to recover the loss followed. Thereupon defendant moved to limit its liability to the sum of $50 and for entry of judgment in favor of plaintiffs for that amount. Special Term denied the motion. We have hitherto indicated that a clause such as that contained in the contract now before us which limited the liability of the installer was effective to bar greater liability on the part of the defendant than that specified in the agreement between the parties *(H. G. Metals v Wells Fargo Alarm Servs.,*45 AD2d 490). Accordingly, summary judgment should have been granted to the extent sought by defendant. Settle order. Concur— Bloom, J. P., Markewich, Silverman and Ross, JJ.
EXHIBIT 21.1
                                  ------------

                    PrimeSource Healthcare, Inc. Subsidiaries
                    -----------------------------------------


1.   Cathtec, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (not operational).

2.   Fiber  Imaging  Technologies,   Inc.,  a  Massachusetts   corporation  (not
     operational).

3.   CardioDyne, Incorporated, a Massachusetts corporation (not operational).

4.   PrimeSource Surgical, Inc., a Delaware corporation.

5.   Bimeco, Inc., a Florida corporation.

6.   Ruby Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

The State of Texas, Appellant

No. 06

- 13

- 00118

- CR v.

Jorge Louis Verde, Appellee Appeal from the 336th District Court of Fannin County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. CR

- 12

- 24362 ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, Justice Carter and Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We further order that the appellant, The State of Texas, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED APRIL 23 , 2014 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

TAVANI GLAZE,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 3:20cv5483-LC/MAF

M.V. JOSEPH, Warden,

Respondent.

 /

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of 

the U.S. Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 4) that the petition for writ of habeas 

corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, be dismissed without prejudice. 

The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation 

and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. 

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have 

determined it should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

Case 3:20-cv-05483-LC-MAF Document 5 Filed 08/12/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:20cv5483-LC/MAF

1. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 4) is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this order. 

2. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “The petition is dismissed 

without prejudice.” 

3. The Clerk shall close the file. 

DONE AND ORDERED on the 12th day of August, 2020.

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

s/L.A. Collier 

Case 3:20-cv-05483-LC-MAF Document 5 Filed 08/12/20 Page 2 of 2
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2215 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Sulfur Blue 7. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 30, 2006 

Mr. DEMINT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Sulfur Blue 7. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SULFUR BLUE 7. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.08.01 Sulfur Blue 7 (CAS No. 

1327–57–7) (provided for in 

subheading 3204.19.50) ...... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2008 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 
2 

•S 2215 IS

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Pettibone Corporation, Appellant, and International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, AFL/CIO Local Lodge No. 1512, Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated at Special Term, Murphy, J. (Appeal from order of Oneida Supreme Court—vacate arbitrator’s award.) Present—Simons, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Callahan, Doerr and Moule, JJ.
#### Nancy V., Respondent, v Raymond E. C., Appellant.

In a paternity proceeding, the appeals are from (1) an order of the Family Court, Nassau County, entered October 16, 1978, which, after a hearing, adjudged appellant to be the father of petitioner’s child and (2) an order of the same court, entered November 3, 1978, which directed appellant to pay $20 per week for the support of the child. Appeal from the order entered October 16, 1978, dismissed, without costs or disbursements. The order is not an "order of disposition” (see Family Ct Act, § 1112) and is reviewed on the appeal from the order entered November 3, 1978. Order entered November 3, 1978 affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Although appellant admitted having sexual relations with petitioner over a one-year period, he denied having such relations with her during the time critical to conception. Nevertheless the only evidence of access by other men during the critical period was uncorroborated, and therefore inadmissible (Family Ct Act, § 531). Where the determination rests basically on a resolution of credibility the finding of the Trial Judge, sitting without jury, is accorded great weight (see *Matter of Susan W. v Amhad Q.,*65 AD2d 594). The evidence was sufficient to prove paternity. Hopkins, J. P., Lazer, Gibbons and Rabin, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000795196
<NAME> JOHN HANCOCK REALTY INCOME FUND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       2,476,260
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,476,260
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,476,260
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          747,301
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,728,959
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,476,260
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,453,498
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,049,978
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,403,520
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,403,520
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,403,520
<EPS-BASIC>                                      13.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    13.19


</TABLE>
5 - 1

CHAPTER 5

STATIONS TRANSMITTING MEDICAL ADVICE

500A. General. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

500B. Station List. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
#### § 301.76 Restrictions on the interstate movement of regulated articles.

No person may move interstate from any quarantined area any articles regulated for citrus greening and Asian citrus psyllid, except in accordance with this subpart.[1]

###### Footnotes -
  301.76

[1] In order to enforce this section, any properly identified inspector is authorized to stop and inspect persons and means of conveyance and to seize, quarantine, treat, apply other remedial measures to, destroy, or otherwise dispose of host articles as provided in sections 414, 421, and 434 of the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7714, 7731, and 7754).
```

[Federal Register: July 27, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 143)]
[Notices]               
[Page 43944]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr27jy10-59]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Defense Logistics Agency

 
Membership of the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Senior Executive 
Service (SES) Performance Review Board (PRB)

AGENCY: DLA.

ACTION: Notice of membership--2010 DLA PRB.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the appointment of members to the DLA 
SES Performance Review Board (PRB). The publication of PRB composition 
is required by 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4). The PRB provides fair and impartial 
review of SES performance appraisals and makes recommendations to the 
Director, DLA, with respect to pay level adjustments and performance 
awards and other actions related to management of the SES cadre.

DATES: Effective Date: September 16, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Defense Logistics Agency, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Suite 
2533, Fort Belvoir, Virginia 22060-6221.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Ms. Lisa Novajosky, SES Program 
Manager, DLA Human Resources (J-14), Defense Logistics Agency, (703) 
767-6447.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4), the 
following are the names and titles of DLA career executives appointed 
to serve as members of the SES PRB. Members will serve a 12-month term, 
which begins on September 16, 2010.
    PRB Chair: Mr. J. Anthony Poleo, Director, DLA Finance.
    Members:

Mr. Brad Bunn, Director, DLA Human Resources (Non-Voting Member);
Ms. Mae DeVincenis, Acting Director, DLA Logistics Operations;
Ms. Nancy Heimbaugh, Director, DLA Acquisitions.

A.S. Thompson,
Vice Admiral, Director.
[FR Doc. 2010-18200 Filed 7-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE M
```
#### § 3701.1 General statement.

This part is issued in accordance with the regulations of the Secretary of Agriculture in part 1, subpart A of this title and appendix A thereto, implementing the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552). The Secretary's regulations, as implemented by the regulations in this part, govern the availability of records of the Economic Research Service (ERS) to the public.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:92cr4013-WS

MICHAEL MORGAN, 4:09cv408-WS

Defendant.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc.

1929) docketed December 23, 2009. The magistrate judge recommends that the

defendant's "Appeal Motion Pursuant [to] Section 3742" be summarily dismissed as an

attempt to file an unauthorized second or successive section 2255 motion. Although the

defendant was granted an extension of time—until February 5, 2010—to file objections

to the report and recommendation, no objections have been filed.

Upon review of the record, this court has determined that the magistrate judge’s

report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 1929) is hereby

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order.
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 4:92cr4079-WS

2. The defendant's "Appeal Motion Pursuant [to] Section 3742" (doc. 1918) is

hereby summarily DISMISSED.

3. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and shall close Case No.

4:09cv408-WS.

DONE AND ORDERED this 18th day of February , 2010.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE