alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 318.13-9 Inspection and disinfection of means of conveyance. ( a ) *Inspection of aircraft prior to departure.* No person shall move any aircraft from Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, or the U.S. Virgin Islands to any other State unless the person moving the aircraft has contacted an inspector and offered the inspector the opportunity to inspect the aircraft prior to departure and the inspector has informed the person proposing to move the aircraft that the aircraft may depart.
( b ) *Inspection of aircraft moving to Guam.* Any person who has moved an aircraft from Hawaii, Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, or the U.S. Virgin Islands to Guam shall contact an inspector and offer the inspector the opportunity to inspect the aircraft upon the aircraft's arrival in Guam.
( c ) *Inspection of ships upon arrival.* Any person who has moved a ship or other oceangoing craft from Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, or the U.S. Virgin Islands to any other State shall contact an inspector and offer the inspector the opportunity to inspect the ship or other oceangoing craft upon its arrival.
( d ) *Disinfection of means of conveyance.* If an inspector finds that a means of conveyance is infested with or contains plant pests, and the inspector orders disinfection of the means of conveyance, then the person in charge or in possession of the means of conveyance shall disinfect the means of conveyance and its cargo in accordance with an approved method contained in part 305 of this chapter under the supervision of an inspector and in a manner prescribed by the inspector, prior to any movement of the means of conveyance or its cargo.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Wilfredo Colon, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Same memorandum as in *People v Bosque*(78 AD2d 986). (Appeal from judgment of Erie Supreme Court — murder, second degree, and another charge.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Schnepp, Callahan, Doerr and Witmer, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE ANNUAL
AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998             MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1997             JUN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998             MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                         600,525                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  201,950                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (9,825)                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    420,585                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,230,565                       0
<PP&E>                                         675,933                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                               (659,801)                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,269,996                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          152,577                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                     2,383,385                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,265,966)                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,269,996                       0
<SALES>                                      1,685,512               2,490,919
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,817,595               2,514,330
<CGS>                                        (965,928)             (1,569,654)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              (1,753,284)             (2,425,117)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 64,311                  89,213
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (800)                   (800)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             63,511                  88,413
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    63,511                  88,413
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04                    0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04                    0.06
        

</TABLE>
#### § 2810.2 Organization.

The Office of Operations (OO) was established January 12, 1982. Delegations of authority to the Director, OO, appear at 7 CFR 2.76. The organization is comprised of six divisions and one staff located at Department headquarters. Description of the functions of these organizational units are in the following section. The organization is headed by a Director.
§ 331.15 Training. ( a ) An individual or entity required to register under this part must provide information and training on biocontainment, biosafety, security (including security awareness), and incident response to: ( 1 ) Each individual with access approval from the Administrator or HHS Secretary. The training must address the particular needs of the individual, the work they will do, and the risks posed by the select agents or toxins. The training must be accomplished prior to the individual's entry into an area where a select agent is handled or stored, or within 12 months of the date the individual was approved by the Administrator or the HHS Secretary for access, whichever is earlier.
( 2 ) Each individual not approved for access to select agents and toxins by the Administrator or HHS Secretary before that individual enters areas under escort where select agents or toxins are handled or stored (*e.g.,* laboratories, growth chambers, animal rooms, greenhouses, storage areas, shipping/receiving areas, production facilities, etc.). Training for escorted personnel must be based on the risk associated with accessing areas where select agents and toxins are used and/or stored. The training must be accomplished prior to the individual's entry into where select agents or toxins are handled or stored (*e.g.,* laboratories, growth chambers, animal rooms, greenhouses, storage areas, shipping/receiving areas, production facilities, etc.).
( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) Refresher training must be provided annually for individuals with access approval from the HHS Secretary or Administrator or at such time as the registered individual or entity significantly amends its security, incident response, or biocontainment plans.
( d ) The responsible official must ensure a record of the training provided to each individual with access to select agents and toxins and each escorted individual (e.g., laboratory workers, visitors, etc.) is maintained. The record must include the name of the individual, the date of the training, a description of the training provided, and the means used to verify that the employee understood the training.
( e ) The responsible official must ensure and document that individuals are provided the contact information of the USDA Office of Inspector General Hotline and the HHS Office of Inspector General Hotline so that they may anonymously report any safety or security concerns related to select agents and toxins.
[77 FR 61076, Oct. 5, 2012, as amended at 82 FR 6206, Jan. 19, 2017]
§ 3431.21 Breach. ( a ) *General.* If a program participant fails to complete the period of obligated service incurred under the service agreement, including failing to comply with the applicable terms and conditions of a waiver granted by the Secretary, the program participant must pay to the United States an amount as determined in the service agreement. Payment of this amount shall be made within 90 days of the date that the program participant failed to complete the period of obligated service, as determined by the Secretary.
( b ) *Exceptions.* ( 1 ) A termination of service for reasons that are beyond the control of the program participant will not be considered a breach.
( 2 ) A transfer of service from one shortage situation to another, if approved by the Secretary, will not be considered a breach.
( 3 ) A call or order to active duty will not be considered a breach.
( c ) The Secretary may renegotiate the terms of a participant's service agreement in the event of a transfer, termination or call to active duty pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section.
( d ) *Amount of repayment.* The service agreement shall provide the method for the calculation of the amount owed by a program participant who has breached a service agreement.
( e ) *Debt Collection.* Individuals in breach of a service agreement entered into under this part are considered to owe a debt to the United States for the amount of repayment. Any such debt will be collected pursuant to the Department's Debt Management regulations at 7 CFR part 3.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on From 10-K of SkyWest, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jerry C. Atkin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|/s/JERRY C. ATKINJerry C. Atkin
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
February 26, 2008 |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Tyrone Abraham, Appellant.

[813 NYS2d 438]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John M. Perone, J.) rendered December 4, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree, and sentencing him to a term of 25 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

When viewed in context, there was nothing false about a pros*334ecution witness’s trial testimony that, when he testified before the grand jury, he was not aware he had received immunity, and that the prosecutor did not discuss the issue of immunity with him. Accordingly, there was no “false” testimony for the prosecutor to correct. The record establishes that the witness did not even learn that he had immunity until shortly before the trial. In any event, there is no evidence that this witness was “granted” immunity in “return” for his testimony; instead, although he may have had a possible connection to the crime, he simply received automatic immunity under CPL 190.40 (2) in the same manner as any ordinary nontargeted witness *(see People v Piazza,*48 NY2d 151, 162-163 [1979]). Moreover, defendant ultimately elicited from the witness that he had no fear of being prosecuted. Accordingly, there was no concealed promise of leniency, and defendant’s constitutional arguments in this regard *(see People v Cwikla,*46 NY2d 434, 441 [1979]; *Giglio v United States,*405 US 150, 153-154 [1972]) are without merit.

The prosecutor did not impeach his own witness with his prior statement to the police and his grand jury testimony. Instead, the prosecutor properly used these materials to refresh the witness’s recollection without disclosing their contents to the jury *(see*CPL 60.35; *People v Edwards,*232 AD2d 342 [1996], *lv denied*89 NY2d 984 [1997], *cert denied*522 US 1121 [1998]; *see also People v Marshall,*220 AD2d 692 [1995], *lv denied*87 NY2d 904 [1995]). The record fails to support defendant’s argument that the prosecutor effectively revealed the contents of these statements.

Defendant did not preserve his claim that the court should have submitted to the jury the factual issue of the possible accomplice status of a witness, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that while there was a factual basis for submitting this issue to the jury *(see*CPL 60.22), any error was harmless in light of the extensive nonaccomplice testimony *(see e.g. People v Brown,*209 AD2d 233 [1994], *lv denied*85 NY2d 860 [1995]).

On the existing record, to the extent it permits review, we find that defendant received effective assistance under the state and federal standards *(see People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708, 713-714 [1998]; *see also Strickland v Washington,*466 US 668 [1984]).

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Marlow, Nardelli and Malone, JJ.
EXHIBIT 31.1



CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION



I, Denise Smith, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Silver Pearl Enterprises, Inc.



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



---

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.





Date: May 16, 2007















/s/ Denise Smith





Denise Smith









President and Chief Executive Officer
#### §§ 3560.310-3560.349 [Reserved]
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13(a)-14(a)
(SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of India Globalization Capital, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of India Globalization Capital, Inc., as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    India Globalization Capital, Inc.s other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for India Globalization Capital, Inc., and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to India Globalization Capital, Inc., including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of India Globalization Capital, Inc.s disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any changes in India Globalization Capital, Inc.s
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during India Globalization
Capital, Inc.s most recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, India Globalization Capital, Inc.s internal control over
financial reporting.
 5
    
    India Globalization Capital, Inc.s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to India
Globalization Capital, Inc.s auditors and the audit committee of India Globalization Capital,
Inc.s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect India Globalization Capital, Inc.s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in India Globalization Capital, Inc.s internal controls
over financial reporting.
 Date: November 17, 2006
    /s/ Ram MukundaRam Mukunda, Chief Executive Officer / President
C eft p
Nor Is I IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA PR 22-0005
IN RE THE MOTION OF JOHN P. SCHWARTZ FOR ADMISSION TO THE BAR OF THE STATE OF MONTANA _ 

### CEC 2 0 2"22 E' C. 0 E urt

John P. Schwartzhas filed a motion for admission tothe Bar ofthe State ofMontana pursuant to RuleV ofthe Rules forAdmission, Admission on Motion. TheBarAdmissions Administrator ofthe State Bar ofMontana has informed the Court that the Commission on Character and Fitness has certified that Schwartz has provided the necessary documentation and has satisfied the requirements prerequisite to admission on motion under Rule V. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon payment of any application fees and completion of any other processing requirements as set forth by the Bar Admissions Administrator, John P. Schwartz may be sworn in to the practice of law in the State of Montana. Arrangements for swearing in may be made by contactingthe office ofthe Clerk ofthe Montana Supreme Court. The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to Petitioner and to the State Bar ofMontana. DATED this day ofDecember, 2022. ChiefJustice 12/20/2022

Case Number: PR 22-0005Justices

2
#### § 27.8 Director.

The Director shall perform for and under the supervision of the Administrator, such duties as the Administrator may require in enforcing the provisions of the Act and this subpart.