alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 3201.65 Concrete and asphalt cleaners. ( a ) *Definition.* Chemicals used in concrete etching as well as to remove petroleum-based soils, lubricants, paints, mastics, organic soils, rust, and dirt from concrete, asphalt, stone and other hard porous surfaces. Products within this item include only those marketed for use in commercial or residential construction or industrial applications.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The Federal preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 70 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than July 23, 2012, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased concrete and asphalt cleaners. By that date, Federal agencies that have the responsibility for drafting or reviewing specifications for items to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased concrete and asphalt cleaners.
[76 FR 43817, July 22, 2011]
PUBLIC LAW 108–328—OCT. 16, 2004 118 STAT. 1273

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2771 (S. 1425):

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 108–476 (Comm. on Energy and Commerce).

SENATE REPORTS: No. 108–205 accompanying S. 1425 (Comm. on Environment

and Public Works).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):

May 5, considered and passed House.

Sept. 30, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 108–328

108th Congress

An Act

To amend the Safe Drinking Water Act to reauthorize the New York City Watershed

Protection Program.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NEW YORK CITY WATERSHED PROTECTION PROGRAM.

Section 1443(d)(4) of the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C.

300j–2(d)(4)) is amended by striking ‘‘1997 through 2003’’ and

inserting ‘‘2003 through 2010’’.

Approved October 16, 2004.

Oct. 16, 2004

[H.R. 2771]
*Wednesday, August 26, 1998*

MERIT DOCKET

98-1171.

#### State ex rel. Kurk v. Turner.

In Mandamus. *Sua sponte,*cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Douglas and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.
149 So.2d 767

#### CHARLES H. HEBERT COMPANY, Inc. v. AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY et al.

No. 46557.

Feb. 18, 1963.

Writ refused. The judgment is correct.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 1:94-cr-01009-MP-AK

ROGER DARMON,

Defendant.

___________________________/

O R D E R 

This matter is before the Court on Doc.1022, Motion to Dismiss Indictment as to Roger

Darmon filed by the Government. In support of its motion, the government has provided

documentation indicating that the defendant is deceased. Doc. 1022-2. Accordingly, pursuant to

Fed. R. Crim. P. 48, the Indictment in this cause as to defendant Roger Darmon is dismissed.

DONE AND ORDERED this 27th day of April, 2006

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:94-cr-01009-MP-GRJ Document 1023 Filed 04/27/06 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 258 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 258

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to fraudulent 
 representations about having received military decorations or medals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stolen Valor Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. FRAUDULENT REPRESENTATIONS ABOUT RECEIPT OF MILITARY 
              DECORATIONS OR MEDALS.

    (a) In General.--Section 704 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``wears,''; and
            (2) so that subsection (b) reads as follows:
    ``(b) Fraudulent Representations About Receipt of Military 
Decorations or Medals.--Whoever, with intent to obtain money, property, 
or other tangible benefit, fraudulently holds oneself out to be a 
recipient of a decoration or medal described in subsection (c)(2) or 
(d) shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than one year, 
or both.''.
    (b) Addition of Certain Other Medals.--Section 704(d) of title 18, 
United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``If a decoration'' and inserting the 
        following:
            ``(1) In general.--If a decoration'';
            (2) by inserting ``a combat badge,'' after ``1129 of title 
        10,''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Combat badge defined.--In this subsection, the term 
        `combat badge' means a Combat Infantryman's Badge, Combat 
        Action Badge, Combat Medical Badge, Combat Action Ribbon, or 
        Combat Action Medal.''.
    (c) Conforming Amendment.--Section 704 of title 18, United States 
Code, is amended in each of subsections (c)(1) and (d) by striking ``or 
(b)''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 20, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 258

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to fraudulent 
 representations about having received military decorations or medals.
```
#### § 35.1 Act.

*Act* or *Export Grape and Plum Act* means “An Act to promote the foreign trade of the United States in grapes and plums, to protect the reputation of American-grown grapes and plums in foreign markets, to prevent deception or misrepresentation as to the quality of such products moving in foreign commerce, to provide for the commercial inspection of such products entering such commerce, and for other purposes” (74 Stat. 734; 75 Stat. 220; 7 U.S.C. 591-599).
MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

96-1052.

#### State ex rel. Kleer v. Winchester Terrace, Inc.

Franklin App. No. 95APD05-554. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court *1426of Appeals for Franklin County. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
EXHIBIT 13.2 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*  In connection with the annual report of North American Nickel Inc. (formerly Widescope Resources Inc.) (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Cheryl Messier, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. the Report containing the financial statements of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: April 20, 2015  /s/ Cheryl Messier Cheryl Messier Chief Financial Officer  * A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 330.108 Authority to issue administrative instructions.

The Deputy Administrator is authorized to issue the administrative instructions for which provision is made in the regulations in this part, for the purpose of preventing dissemination of plant pests into the United States or interstate. In addition, whenever the Deputy Administrator shall find that existing conditions as to pest risk involved in the movement of plant pests, means of conveyance, or other products or articles to which the regulations in this part apply, make it safe to modify by making less stringent the restrictions contained in any of such regulations, he shall publish such findings in administrative instructions, specifying the manner in which the regulations shall be made less stringent whereupon such modification shall become effective.
§ 3201.25 2-Cycle engine oils. ( a ) *Definition.* Lubricants designed for use in 2-cycle engines to provide lubrication, decreased spark plug fouling, reduced deposit formation, and/or reduced engine wear.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The preferred procurement product must have a biobased content of at least 34 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than May 14, 2009, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased 2-cycle engine oils. By that date, Federal agencies that have the responsibility for drafting or reviewing specifications for items to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased 2-cycle engine oils.
[73 FR 27973, May 14, 2008]
#### § 3550.101 Program objectives.

This subpart sets forth policies for administering loans and grants under section 504(a) of title V of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended. Section 504 loans and grants are intended to help very low-income owner-occupants in rural areas repair their properties. This subpart also covers Water and Waste Disposal (WWD) Grants to individuals authorized by Section 306C(b) of the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act, (7 U.S.C. 1926c).

[61 FR 59779, Nov. 22, 1996, as amended at 67 FR 78331, Dec. 24, 2002]
#### Raymond Dominquez, Appellant, v Dennis De Tiberus, Respondent.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated September 25,1979, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint as barred by the Statute of Limitations. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. On November 14, 1977, just four days prior to the expiration of the Statute of Limitations, plaintiff filed a copy of the summons and complaint with the Queens County Sheriff in an attempt to toll the Statute of Limitations pursuant to CPLR 203 (subd [b], par 5). Compliance with that section, pursuant to its amendment effective September 1, 1976, and thus applicable at the time of attempted service herein, required that delivery and filing should properly have been with the Clerk of Queens County, inasmuch as it appears from the summons that the action was designated to be tried in Queens County, located within the City of New York, which is also the county stated to be the location of defendant’s residence. To the extent that this decision may be inconsistent with *Bromley v Cosmatos*(75 AD2d 798), the latter is overruled. Titone, J. P., Gibbons and Gulotta, JJ., concur.

Weinstein, J.,

dissents and votes to reverse the order, deny the motion, and reinstate the complaint, with the following memorandum: I would hold that filing the summons and complaint with the Sheriff of Queens County successfully tolled the Statute of Limitations (cf. *Bromley v Cosmatos,*75 AD2d 798). Plaintiff substantially complied with the statutory requirements and defendant received the required notification of the action within the 60-day period provided by CPLR 203 (subd [b], par 5).
# CI2021226EN.01000101.xml

| 14.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 226/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 226/1

---

Statement by the European Parliament on the suspension of assistance granted under the external financing instruments

(2021/C 226 I/01)

The European Parliament notes that Regulation (EU) 2021/947 establishing the Neighbourhood, Development and International Cooperation Instrument - Global Europe contains a general reference on the possibility of suspending assistance without specifying the concrete basis for such a decision. Such a suspension of assistance should be implemented where a partner country persistently fails to observe the principles of democracy, the rule of law or good governance, or respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms or for internationally recognised nuclear safety standards.

Nevertheless, the European Parliament notes that, unlike in other geographic areas of cooperation, specific provisions for the Neighbourhood area, in particular Article 20(2), provide for increased support to civil society, conflict prevention and peacebuilding, people-to-people contacts, including cooperation between local authorities, support for the improvement of human rights or crisis-related support measures, in the event of serious or persistent degradation of democracy, human rights or the rule of law, or an increased risk of conflict. The European Parliament considers that such increased support to the above-mentioned areas should be provided if such degradation occurs in countries outside the Neighbourhood area as well, and recalls that in particular Article 4(5) foresees that actions implemented through thematic programmes may also be undertaken where the geographic programme has been suspended.

The European Parliament considers that any suspension of assistance under these instruments would modify the overall financial scheme agreed under the ordinary legislative procedure. As a co-legislator and co-branch of the budgetary authority, the European Parliament is therefore entitled to fully exercise its prerogatives in that regard, if such a decision is to be taken.

---
§ 3550.300 OMB control number. The information collection requirements contained in this regulation have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and have been assigned OMB control number 0575-0172. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to vary from 5 minutes to 3 hours per response, with an average of 11 ⁄ 2 hours per response, including time for review instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. [61 FR 59779, Nov. 22, 1996, as amended at 67 FR 78332, Dec. 24, 2002]
2005-1563.

#### Natl. City Bank v. Wilkins.

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2003-A-1327. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals. Upon consideration of appellant’s request for oral argument,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the request is granted.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)

I, Randolph Gress,
certify that:

1. the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Innophos, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided Innophos, Inc. and will be retained by Innophos, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to
update the foregoing certification except as required by law.

Date: August 6, 2009



/S/ RANDOLPH GRESSRandolph Gress Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to the requirements of 18
U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as a part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2462 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2462

   To amend subsection (a) of section 7 of the Small Business Act to 
  eliminate guarantee fees for loans guaranteed under that subsection 
         where the total loan amount is not more than $150,000.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 20, 2013

   Ms. Hahn introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend subsection (a) of section 7 of the Small Business Act to 
  eliminate guarantee fees for loans guaranteed under that subsection 
         where the total loan amount is not more than $150,000.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Opportunity 
Acceleration Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF GUARANTEE FEES FOR LOANS WITH TOTAL LOAN AMOUNTS 
              NOT MORE THAN $150,000.

    Section 7(a)(18)(A) of the Small Business Act is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A)--
                    (A) by striking ``With respect'' and inserting 
                ``Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph, with 
                respect''; and
                    (B) by striking clause (i);
            (2) by striking subparagraph (B); and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(C) No guarantee fees for certain loans.--No 
                guarantee fee shall be collected, payable, or charged 
                under this paragraph if the total loan amount is not 
                more than $150,000.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 29.3556 Tobacco products.

Manufactured tobacco, including cigarettes, cigars, smoking tobacco, chewing tobacco, and snuff, which is subject to Internal Revenue tax.

[30 FR 9207, July 23, 1965. Redesignated at 49 FR 16759, Apr. 20, 1984]
SHERRO D BROW N

OHI O

COMMITTEES : AGRICULTURE , NUTRITION , ;ULTURE , NUTRITION , (^l^»»;^-, J <S:<-/i»4.«,-« , CH^**^*- ^ 

### AN D FORESTR YimtZ i ^MZ B ^^^^ 1 BANKING , HOUSING , AN D URBAN AFFAIRS WASHINGTON , D C 2051 0 HEALTH , EDUCATION , LABOR , AN D PENSION S VETERANS'AFFAIR S AugUS t 10 , 201 1 SELEC T COMMITTE E O N ETHIC S Aloh aLe y Associat e Directo r Smal l Community Ai r

Servic e Developmen t

Progra m.__ , ,.- ^ ^ — Unite dState s Departmen t o f Transportatio n r i iiq,=^ ; Officeo f Aviatio n Analysi s D 5:;^— i ,. )

120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenu e S E Washington , D C 2059 0 • o oo o

~T- I o !""/• >

Dea r Directo r Ley :
It i s my pleasur e t o support th e Toled o Expres s Airport it s effor t t o secur e fundin g throug h th e U.S

. Departmen t

o f Transportation' s Smal l Communit y Ai r Servic e Developmen t

Program Grant

. If awarded , fimding woul db e use dt o attrac t ne w ai r servic e fromToled o Expres s t o bette r serv e thei r communities

. Th e Toled o Expres s Airport ha s see n asignifican t

declin e i n it s ai r

traffi c i n th e pas t decade , an dairlin e capacit y at Toled o Expres s i s dow n mor e tha n 7 0 percen t from2003

. Th e airport

ha s develope dacomprehensiv e ai r servic e incentiv e program , includin g groim d handlin g support

an dstartu p phas e fe e waivers

. It i s my hop e that

th e combinatio n o f

th e gran t fundin g t o support

marketin g an dpromotiona l activities , a s wel l a s th e airport' s incentiv e progra mwil l provid e Toledo with th e tool s i t need s t o revers e th e leakag e o f loca l ai r trave l deman dt o othe r

airports , an dre-establis h som e o f th e ai r servic e that

ha s bee n los t

i n recen t years
. Pleas e giv e seriou s consideratio n t o Toled o Expres s Airport' s applicatio n for funding

. I as k

that yo u kee p my offic e informe do f th e statu s o f

thi s application

.

Sincerely , 

# W » Sherro dBrow n Unite dState s Senato r SB:l m

PRINTE D O N RECYCLE D PAPE R
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2252 

To designate the National Museum of Wildlife Art, located at 2820 Rungius 

Road, Jackson, Wyoming, as the National Museum of Wildlife Art of 

the United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2006 

Mr. ENZI (for himself and Mr. THOMAS) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

A BILL 

To designate the National Museum of Wildlife Art, located 

at 2820 Rungius Road, Jackson, Wyoming, as the National Museum of Wildlife Art of the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. NATIONAL MUSEUM OF WILDLIFE ART OF THE 

4 UNITED STATES. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The National Museum of Wild6 life Art, located at 2820 Rungius Road, Jackson, Wyo7 ming, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘National Mu8 seum of Wildlife Art of the United States’’. 
2 

•S 2252 IS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the museum referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the National Museum of 

5 Wildlife Art of the United States. 

Æ
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eric Johnson, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Westchester County, imposed July 14, 1978. Sentence affirmed. Appellant’s assertion that his guilty plea was the involuntary product "of duress of circumstances” is beyond the scope of this appeal, which is limited to a review of "the legality, propriety or excessiveness of the sentence imposed” (see 22 NYCRR 670.17 [i]). Moreover, the allegations raised involve matters entirely dehors the record and therefore may not be addressed on direct appeal. (Cf. *People v Flowers,*30 NY2d 315; *People v White,*32 NY2d 393.) Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Damiani and Titone, JJ., concur.