alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:03-cr-00055-MP -AK

SANTANA MACEDO,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on a faxed motion by the Defendant requesting this Court

vacate his guilty plea and sentence. Defendant alleges that he was advised by his counsel at the

time that he would not be subject to deportation as a consequence of his guilty plea in this case. 

Counsel’s failure to advise Mr. Macedo of the deportation consequence to his felony conviction,

he argues, renders his plea constitutionally deficient and therefore voidable. See Padilla v.

Kentucky, U.S. Supreme Ct. Case No. 08-651, 2010 WL 1222274 (March 21, 2010). 

Defendant’s immigration attorney, Angela Wynn-Stewart, Esq., has also filed a motion

requesting a copy of Mr. Macedo’s Pre-Sentence Report to assist in her representation in the

immigration context. Upon consideration, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Clerk is directed to docket the Motion to Vacate Plea and Sentence With

Oral Hearing Requested, and to provide the United States with a copy of that

motion. 

2. The United States is DIRECTED to respond to the Motion to Vacate Plea and

Sentence within fifteen (15) days of its receipt. 

3. Ruling on the request for the Pre-Sentence Report is DEFERRED until a ruling
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 1:03-cr-00055-MP -AK

has been issued on the Motion to Vacate Plea and Sentence. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 1st day of December, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
§ 3550.206 Protective advances. RHS may pay for fees or services and charge the cost against the borrower's account to protect the Governments interest. ( a ) *Advances for taxes and insurance.* RHS may advance funds to pay real estate taxes, hazard and flood insurance premiums, and other related costs, as well as amounts needed to fund the current escrow cycle.
( b ) *Advances for costs other than taxes and insurance.* Protective advances for costs other than taxes and insurance, such as emergency repairs, will be made only if the borrower cannot obtain a subsequent loan.
( c ) *Repayment arrangements.* ( 1 ) Advances for borrowers with multiple loans will be charged against the largest loan.
( 2 ) Amounts advanced will be due with the next scheduled payment. RHS may schedule repayment consistent with the borrowers ability to repay or reamortize the loan.
( 3 ) Advances will bear interest at the promissory note rate of the loan to which the advance was charged.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Silver Pearl Enterprises, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Dated:  May 16, 2007



/s/ Denise Smith

Name: Denise Smith

Title:  Chief Executive Officer







Dated:  May 16, 2007



/s/ Denise Smith

Name: Denise Smith

Title:  Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

MATHEW SELOVER,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:20cv4698-TKW-HTC

ESCAMBIA COUNTY BOARD OF

COMMISSIONERS and RAYME

EDLER,

Defendants.

________________________________/

ORDER

Based on the mediator’s reports (Docs. 58, 59), it is ORDERED that Plaintiff 

and Defendant Escambia County shall file a status report 30 days from the date of 

this Order (and every 30 days thereafter) if a stipulation of dismissal as to the County 

is not filed by then.

DONE and ORDERED this 8th day of June, 2021.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-04698-TKW-HTC Document 60 Filed 06/08/21 Page 1 of 1
§ 29.9236 Form of application. Application for inspection and certification of class or type of nonquota tobacco shall include the following information; ( a ) The date of the application;
( b ) The producer's certification of the type of the tobacco, the crop year when produced, and where produced;
( c ) The name and post office address of the applicant;
( d ) The financial interest of the applicant in the tobacco;
( e ) The exact nature of the service desired;
( f ) A statement that the tobacco is ( 1 ) in commerce, as defined in the act, or
( 2 ) entering such commerce; and
( g ) Such other necessary information as the Director may require.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000793500
<NAME> NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPLY CO
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,425
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,303
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,071)
<INVENTORY>                                     27,614
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67,349
<PP&E>                                          45,382
<DEPRECIATION>                                (23,390)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 115,984
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,313
<BONDS>                                         14,000
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      6,644
<OTHER-SE>                                      58,880
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   115,984
<SALES>                                        310,125
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               310,125
<CGS>                                          207,119
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  207,119
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   791
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,578
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,642
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,633
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,009
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,009
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .82
        

</TABLE>
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-10-00034-CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF

STANLEY CRAIG HARRAL

AND

SHARON ANNE HARRAL

From the 66th District Court

Hill County, Texas

Trial Court No. 47,540

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Sharon Anne Harral, appealed a final decree of divorce signed on 

November 16, 2009. The Clerk of this Court warned Harral that the appeal was subject 

to dismissal because it appeared the notice of appeal was untimely. The Clerk also 

warned Harral that unless a response was filed showing grounds for continuing the 

appeal, the appeal would be dismissed. Harral has not responded to the Clerk’s letter.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3.

Further, absent a specific exemption, the Clerk of the Court must collect filing 

fees at the time a document is presented for filing. TEX. R. APP. P. 12.1(b); Appendix to 

TEX. R. APP. P., Order Regarding Fees (Amended Aug. 28, 2007, eff. Sept. 1, 2007). See 
In the Matter of the Marriage of Harral Page 2

also TEX. R. APP. P. 5; 10TH TEX. APP. (WACO) LOC. R. 5; TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 

51.207(b); § 51.941(a) (Vernon 2005); and § 51.208 (Vernon Supp. 2009). Under these 

circumstances, we suspend the rule and order the Clerk to write off all unpaid filing 

fees in this case. TEX. R. APP. P. 2. The write-off of the fees from the accounts receivable 

of the Court in no way eliminates or reduces the fees owed by Harral.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Reyna, and

Justice Davis

Appeal dismissed 

Opinion delivered and filed March 3, 2010

[CV06]
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

United States of America

ex rel. Rayme M. Edler, M.D.

Plaintiffs,

v. Case 3:20-cv-05503-RV-HTC

Escambia County

Defendant.

_____________________________/

CONSENT MOTION FOR HIPAA QUALIFIED PROTECTIVE ORDER 

Documents relevant to this case include protected health information 

covered by the Privacy Regulations issued under the Health Insurance Portability 

and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”). 

To facilitate discovery, and in accordance with 45 C.F.R. § 164.512(e)(v),

Relator Dr. Edler, with the consent of Defendant Escambia County, requests that 

the Court enter the attached proposed HIPAA Qualified Protective Order. 

Case 3:20-cv-05503-RV-HTC Document 23 Filed 08/04/21 Page 1 of 2
2

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Jonathan Kroner

FBN 328677

Jonathan Kroner Law Office

6001 N Ocean Dr., Ste. 806

Hollywood, FL 33019-4617

305.310.6046

jk@FloridaFalseClaim.com

Law Offices of Darth M. Newman LLC

Darth M. Newman

1140 Thorn Run Rd., #601

Coraopolis, PA 15108

412.436.3443

darth@dnewmanlaw.com

(admitted pro hac vice)

Attorneys for Qui Tam Plaintiff

LR 7.1 (F) Certificate of Word Count

I certify the LR 7.1 (F) word count of 59 words, and I relied on MS Word’s 

count for this certification.

/s/ Jonathan Kroner

Certificate of Service

I certify I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of

Court using CM/ECF on the date stamped above to be served on all counsel of

record.

/s/ Jonathan Kroner

Case 3:20-cv-05503-RV-HTC Document 23 Filed 08/04/21 Page 2 of 2
#### §§ 3555.153-3555.199 [Reserved]
ENCLOSURE 1

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

STATE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD

REGULATIONS FOR THE CONTROL AND ABATEMENT OF AIR POLLUTION

PROVISIONS AFFECTED

REVISION F 1 4

CONCERNING

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

(9VAC5 CHAPTER 8 0 )

Adoption Date: September 5, 2014

Effective Date: November 19, 2014

The following table lists the specific provisions of the attached regulations that will be

used to implement the State Implementation Plan (SIP). Highlighted provisions are

included for information purposes onl y and are not to be construed as part of the

Commonwealth's SIP, nor are any provisions directly related to the highlighted

provisions to be considered as part of the SIP. A copy of the actual regulation

submitted for approval and incorporation by referen ce into the Virginia SIP is included in

Enclosure 2; details concerning the specific provisions that are not to be included in the

Virginia SIP are noted in this copy.

CHAPTER 170 GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

PART I DEFINITIONS

9VAC5

- 170

- 20 Terms defined

Added

- disclosure form, potential conflict of interest

PART I X CONFLICT OF INTEREST (added)

9VAC5

- 170

- 210 General (added)

Subsection B

TEMPLATES \ SIP

- REG \ REG01

SIP \ ASSESSMENT \ F 1 4

- SIP

- 1.DOC
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

RICHARD W. MCCARTHY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D21-1430

September 3, 2021

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit 

Court for Pinellas County; Philip J. Federico, Judge.

Richard W. McCarthy, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Ratliff v. State, 914 So. 2d 938 (Fla. 2005); 

Grant v. State, 770 So. 2d 655 (Fla. 2000); State v. Cotton, 769 So. 

2d 345 (Fla. 2000); McDonald v. State, 133 So. 3d 530 (Fla. 2d DCA 

2013); Hughes v. State, 22 So. 3d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Brown v. 

State, 827 So. 2d 1054 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Joe v. Moore, 787 So. 2d 
2

55 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001); Clark v. State, 779 So. 2d 343 (Fla. 2d DCA 

2000); Nelson v. State, 761 So. 2d 452 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Holmes 

v. State, 245 So. 3d 857 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018); Williams v. State, 925 

So. 2d 427 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); Enriquez v. State, 885 So. 2d 892 

(Fla. 3d DCA 2004); Williams v. State, 715 So. 2d 336 (Fla. 1st DCA 

1998).

BLACK, SLEET, and LABRIT, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
98-1229.

#### Blackburn v. Petree.

In Procedendo. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Case 4:20-cv-00313-WS-MAF Document 1 Filed 06/11/20 Page 1 of 15
Case 4:20-cv-00313-WS-MAF Document 1 Filed 06/11/20 Page 2 of 15
Case 4:20-cv-00313-WS-MAF Document 1 Filed 06/11/20 Page 3 of 15
Case 4:20-cv-00313-WS-MAF Document 1 Filed 06/11/20 Page 4 of 15
Case 4:20-cv-00313-WS-MAF Document 1 Filed 06/11/20 Page 5 of 15
Case 4:20-cv-00313-WS-MAF Document 1 Filed 06/11/20 Page 6 of 15
Case 4:20-cv-00313-WS-MAF Document 1 Filed 06/11/20 Page 7 of 15
Case 4:20-cv-00313-WS-MAF Document 1 Filed 06/11/20 Page 8 of 15
Case 4:20-cv-00313-WS-MAF Document 1 Filed 06/11/20 Page 9 of 15
Case 4:20-cv-00313-WS-MAF Document 1 Filed 06/11/20 Page 10 of 15
Case 4:20-cv-00313-WS-MAF Document 1 Filed 06/11/20 Page 11 of 15
Case 4:20-cv-00313-WS-MAF Document 1 Filed 06/11/20 Page 12 of 15
Case 4:20-cv-00313-WS-MAF Document 1 Filed 06/11/20 Page 13 of 15
Case 4:20-cv-00313-WS-MAF Document 1 Filed 06/11/20 Page 14 of 15
Case 4:20-cv-00313-WS-MAF Document 1 Filed 06/11/20 Page 15 of 15
§ 352.4 Documentation. ( a ) *Manifest.* Immediately upon the arrival of a carrier in the United States the owner shall make available to the inspector for examination a complete manifest or other documentation from which the inspector may determine whether there are on board any prohibited or restricted products or articles subject to this part, other than accompanied baggage and mail.
( b ) *Other documentation.* Any notifications, reports, and similar documentation not specified in the regulations in this part, but necessary to carry out the purpose of the regulations, will be prescribed in administrative instructions.
( c ) *Procedure after examination of documents.* After examination of the carrier cargo manifest or other documentation the inspector may notify the owner and the Customs officer that certain products or articles on board the carrier are subject to this part and may not be unloaded or landed for any purpose pending plant quarantine inspection. In such case the owner shall not unload or land such products or articles without authorization by an inspector.
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS

*May 18, 2006*

[Cite as *05/18/2006 Case Announcements,*2006-Ohio-2433.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2003-1572.

#### State ex rel. Howard v. Indus. Comm.

Franklin App. No. 97AP-860. This cause came on for further consideration of appellant’s motion for leave to file a response instanter to the notice of failure of payment filed by appellee Seaway Food Town, Inc. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for leave is granted.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 4:96cr63-RH/WCS

LAVORN FORD,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER REDUCING SENTENCE

The term of imprisonment to which defendant Lavorn Ford is sentenced is

hereby reduced to a term of one hundred thirty-eight (138) months. In all other

respects the original sentence remains unchanged.

SO ORDERED this 16th day of June, 2005. 

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

Chief United States District Judge 

Case 4:96-cr-00063-RH-WCS Document 156 Filed 06/16/05 Page 1 of 1
168483/2


52

                                
                           EXHIBIT 21
                   PLAYERS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                   SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY
                                
                                
     Subsidiary                    State of Incorporation or
                                        Organization

Metropolis, IL 1292 Limited Partnership Illinois
PCI, Inc.                               Nevada
Players Bluegrass Downs, Inc.           Kentucky
Players Development, Inc.               Nevada
Players Entertainment, Inc.             Nevada
Players Holding, Inc.                   Nevada
Players International, Inc.             Nevada
Players Lake Charles, LLC               Louisiana
Players Lake Charles Riverboat, Inc.    Louisiana
Players LC, Inc.                        Nevada
Players Maryland Heights, Inc.          Missouri
Players MH, L.P.                        Missouri
Players Maryland Heights Nevada, Inc.   Nevada
Players Mesquite Golf Club, Inc.        Nevada
Players Mesquite Land, Inc.             Nevada
Players Nevada, Inc.                    Nevada
Players Resources, Inc.                 Nevada
Players Riverboat, LLC                  Louisiana
Players Riverboat, Inc.                 Nevada
Players Riverboat Management, Inc.      Nevada
Players Services, Inc.                  New Jersey
Riverfront Realty Corporation           Illinois
Riverside Joint Venture                 Missouri
Showboat Star Partnership               Louisiana
Southern Illinois Riverboat/Casino Cruises, Inc.  Illinois
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

SIDNEY MARTS,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 3:20cv5545-LC-HTC

SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

/

ORD ER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report

and Recommendation dated August 12, 2020 (ECF No. 7). The parties have been

furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section

636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation and the objections

thereto, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be

adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF Doc. 7) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

Case 3:20-cv-05545-LC-HTC Document 10 Filed 08/26/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

2. The petition, ECF Doc. 1 is DISMISSED under Habeas Rule 4. 

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. 

4. The Clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 26th

 day of August, 2020.

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No. 3:20cv5545-LC-HTC

Case 3:20-cv-05545-LC-HTC Document 10 Filed 08/26/20 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

DEBORAH LAUFER

VS CASE NO. 1:19-cv-00200-AW-GRJ

ARAPAN LLC

JUDGMENT

This case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

 September 25, 2020

JESSICA J. LYUBLANOVITS

CLERK OF COURT

s/ KELLI MALU

DATE Deputy Clerk: Kelli Malu

 

Case 1:19-cv-00200-AW-GRJ Document 46 Filed 09/25/20 Page 1 of 1
#### § 355.1 Purpose.

Pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 *et seq.*), the Secretary is responsible for the enforcement of the provisions of the Act and Convention that pertain to the importation, exportation, or reexportation of terrestrial plants.[1] The regulations in this part are for the purpose of implementing this authority. Regulations of the U.S. Department of the Interior that correlate with the regulations in this part are contained in 50 CFR chapter I.[2]

[66 FR 21060, Apr. 27, 2001]

###### Footnotes -
  355.1

[1] Under section 11 of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1540), it is unlawful for any person to knowingly violate any provision of the Act, any permit or certificate issued under the Act, or any regulation promulgated under the Act. Section 11 of the Act also provides for criminal, civil, and administrative penalties for any such violation.

[2] Plant Protection and Quarantine also administers programs under the Lacey Act Amendments of 1981, as amended (16 U.S.C. 3371 through 3378), 7 U.S.C. 2814, and the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7701-7772), which authorize additional prohibitions and restrictions on the importation of plants subject to this part (see other parts of 7 CFR chapter III for regulations containing prohibitions and restrictions under these authorities).
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Lightwave Logic, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Andrew J. Ashton, Treasurer of our Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of our Company.



Date:  May 17, 2010

/s/ Andrew J. Ashton

Andrew J. Ashton

Treasurer

(Principal Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT 32

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BlackRock Kelso Capital
Corporation (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), James R. Maher, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Frank D.
Gordon, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/    James R. Maher         
|Name: James R. Maher          
|Title: Chief Executive Officer
|Date: May 11, 2009            



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/    Frank D. Gordon        
|Name: Frank D. Gordon         
|Title: Chief Financial Officer
|Date: May 11, 2009
Exhibit 32.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Shepard Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

   1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Date:  May 10, 2006


/s/ Michael Eyre
-------------------------------------------
Michael Eyre, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)