alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 330.101 Policy.

The purpose of the regulations in this part is to prevent the dissemination of plant pests into the United States, or interstate, by regulating the movement of plant pests into or through the United States, or interstate, and the movement of means of conveyance, earth, stone and quarry products, garbage, and certain other products and articles into or through the United States, or from any Territory or possession into or through any other Territory or possession or the continental United States. The Deputy Administrator shall employ procedures to carry out this purpose which will impose a minimum of impediment to foreign commerce and travel whenever practicable, consistent with proper precaution against plant pest dissemination. The same policy is to be applied in the case of interstate commerce and travel.
Exhibit
32




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Each
of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Sino Gas
International Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1)
 The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal  quarter  ended March 31, 2009 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and





(2)
 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Date: May
20, 2009





/s/
      Yuchuan LiuYuchuan
      LiuChief
      Executive Officer/s/
      Yugang ZhangYugang
      ZhangChief
      Financial Officer
#### § 3430.313 Inclusion of research topics proposed by national and state commodity boards in request for applications.

NIFA will solicit funding ideas under this subpart from statutorily defined national and state commodity boards for research topics that the commodity boards are willing to co-fund equally with NIFA under the AFRI competitive grant program. If the ideas are evaluated and found to be consistent with the AFRI statutory priorities and priorities noted in the President's budget request related to NIFA, the topics will be incorporated in existing program areas in the relevant AFRI Request for Applications (RFA(s)). Researchers wishing to submit a proposal on a topic suggested by a commodity board will be required to obtain a letter of support from the co-funding commodity board. The applications submitted in response to a commodity board co-funded topic will compete against all proposals submitted in the same RFA program area. Supported applications will receive no preference regarding the evaluation of their scientific merit. Letters of commodity board support will be used by NIFA solely to determine that the application fits within the commodity board co-funded topic and the commodity board is willing to co-fund that application, if it is evaluated by the review panel as being meritorious and recommended for award.

[81 FR 58810, Aug. 26, 2016]
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

DEMETRIUS LEE BATTLE,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 3:20cv5494/TKW/ZCB

JOSHUA A. SPEER, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER

This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 61). No objections were filed.

Upon due consideration of the Report and Recommendation and the entire 

case file, the Court agrees with the magistrate judge’s determination that the claims 

against Defendant “Sgt. Harris” should be dismissed for lack of service. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. The claims against Defendant Harris are DISMISSED without 

prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) for lack of service. 

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Sgt. Harris as a Defendant 

in CM/ECF.

Case 3:20-cv-05494-TKW-ZCB Document 63 Filed 07/03/23 Page 1 of 2
2

4. This case is referred back to the magistrate judge for further 

proceedings. 

DONE and ORDERED this 3rd day of July, 2023.

__________________________________

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-05494-TKW-ZCB Document 63 Filed 07/03/23 Page 2 of 2
§ 3550.5 Environmental requirements. ( a ) *Policy.* RHS will consider environmental quality as equal with economic, social, and other relevant factors in program development and decision-making processes. RHS will take into account potential environmental impacts of proposed projects by working with RHS applicants, other federal agencies, Indian tribes, State and local governments, and interested citizens and organizations in order to formulate actions that advance the program's goals in a manner that will protect, enhance, and restore environmental quality.
( b ) *Regulatory references.* Processing or servicing actions taken under this part must comply with the environmental review requirements in accordance with 7 CFR part 1970, and 7 CFR part 1924, which addresses lead-based paint.
[61 FR 59779, Nov. 22, 1996, as amended at 81 FR 11048, Mar. 2, 2016]
**EXHIBIT 31.2****Certification**I, Richard N. Burger, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Coleman Cable, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusion about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: August 15, 2005 **/s/ Richard N. Burger**     **Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President,**  **Secretary and Treasurer**
35
Exhibit 32.2


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Shepard Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

   1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.


Date:  November 14, 2006


/s/ Glen Macdonald
---------------------------------------
Glen Macdonald, Principal Financial Officer
#### David M. Dubin, appellant, v. John Fellows, appellee.

Gen. No. 8,845.

Opinion filed November 15, 1934.

Axelrod & Kaiser, for appellant; Solomon Axelrod, of .counsel. Clyde Smith, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Huffman

delivered the opinion of the court.
§ 3560.631 Agency monitoring. A compliance review and physical inspection will be conducted by the Agency at least once every 3 years. The purpose of this review will be to inspect: ( a ) Tenant eligibility documentation;
( b ) Financial information on the operation and management of the labor housing, including relevant borrower financial materials;
( c ) Payment of taxes, insurance and hazard insurance;
( d ) Compliance with the security deposit requirements;
( e ) Compliance with the operating plan;
( f ) Compliance with the loan agreement;
( g ) Compliance with Agency requirements for affordable, decent, safe, and sanitary housing; and
( h ) Compliance with civil rights requirements.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2011 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2011

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for a two-year 
      extension of the Veterans' Advisory Committee on Education.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans' Advisory Committee on 
Education Improvement Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. TWO-YEAR EXTENSION OF VETERANS' ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON 
              EDUCATION.

    Section 3692 of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by inserting ``31,'' after ``30,''; and
                    (B) by striking ``and the Persian Gulf War'' and 
                inserting ``the Persian Gulf War, and the post-9/11 
                operations in Iraq and Afghanistan''; and
            (2) in subsection (c), by striking ``December 31, 2013'' 
        and inserting ``December 31, 2015''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 28, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2011

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for a two-year 
      extension of the Veterans' Advisory Committee on Education.
```
98-1752.

#### State v. Castaneda-Diaz.

Cuyahoga App. No. 71160. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
#### § 3431.11 Application.

Individuals who meet the eligibility criteria of § 3431.9 may submit an online program application or any other application process provided by the Secretary.
EXHIBIT
      32.2





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO
      SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
      2002**





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in connection with the filing of the Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 (the “Report”) by
      Sino Gas International Holdings, Inc. (the “Registrant”), I, Fang Chen, hereby
      certify that:





1.
      To the
      best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      To the
      best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of
      the Registrant.




Dated:
                November 16, 2007
            By:
            /s/
                Fang ChenName:Fang
                ChenTitle: Principal
                Accounting Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Lightwave Logic, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James S. Marcelli, Chief Executive Officer of our Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of our Company.



Date:  May 17, 2010

/s/ James S. Marcelli

James S. Marcelli

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
#### § 3560.261 Improperly advanced rental assistance.

Improperly advanced RHS rental assistance resulting from tenant or borrower error or fraud constitutes unauthorized assistance and the provisions of subpart O of this part apply.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: L.F., A MINOR

PETITION OF: N.R., MOTHER :

:

:

:

: No. 312 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

IN THE INTEREST OF: L.A.F., A MINOR

PETITION OF: N.R., MOTHER :

:

:

:

: No. 313 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 9th day of January, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
RECONSIDERATION DOCKET

97-641.

#### Apel v. Katz.

Cuyahoga App. No. 68294. Reported at 83 Ohio St.3d 11, 697 N.E.2d 600. On motion for *1453reconsideration. Motion denied.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., dissent.
#### § 29.73 Designation of markets; termination of designation.

An auction market where tobacco bought or sold thereon at auction or the products customarily manufactured therefrom move in commerce may be designated under the Act by the Secretary after the Director has advised the Secretary that two-thirds of the growers voting in the referendum held in accordance with § 29.74 favored the designation of such market. When a market is designated by the Secretary, he shall give public notice of the fact and in such public notice he shall specify the date on which the requirement of inspection and certification of tobacco sold at auction on such market shall become effective. The Director may temporarily suspend the requirement of inspection and certification on a designated market when it is found impracticable to provide such services because competent inspectors are not obtainable or because the quantity of tobacco available for inspection is insufficient to justify the cost of such service. A designation shall terminate automatically at the end of any two consecutive marketing seasons during which a designated market does not conduct any sales of tobacco at auction. A market whose designation is terminated under this section shall be considered as a new market, as defined in § 29.1, and any future application for services shall be filed and determined in accordance with the provisions of §§ 29.3 and 29.2.

[38 FR 27599, Oct. 5, 1973]
98-1844.

#### State v. Hoover.

Franklin App. No. 97APA10-1399. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; *sua sponte,*cause consolidated with 98-1432, *infra,*and held for the decision in 97- 1985, *State v. Cook,*Allen App. No. 1-97-21; briefing schedule stayed.
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2531 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 26, 2014 

Received 

FEBRUARY 27, 2014 

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

AN ACT 

To prohibit the Internal Revenue Service from asking taxpayers questions regarding religious, political, or social 

beliefs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

HR 2531 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Taxpayers 

3 from Intrusive IRS Requests Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON QUESTIONS REGARDING RELI5 GIOUS, POLITICAL, OR SOCIAL BELIEFS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Internal Revenue Service 

7 shall not ask any taxpayer any question regarding reli8 gious, political, or social beliefs. 

9 (b) SENSE OF CONGRESS REGARDING EXCEP10 TIONS.—It is the sense of Congress that— 

11 (1) any exceptions to subsection (a) which are 

12 provided by later enacted provisions of law should 

13 identify the specific questions which are authorized, 

14 the class of taxpayers to which such questions are 

15 authorized to be asked, and the circumstances under 

16 which such questions are authorized to be asked, 

17 and 

18 (2) if the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue 

19 Service determines that asking any class of tax20 payers a question prohibited under subsection (a) 

21 would aid in the efficient administration of the tax 

22 laws, such Commissioner should submit a report to 

23 Congress which— 

24 (A) includes such question in the verbatim 

25 form in which it is to be asked, 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

HR 2531 RFS

1 (B) describes the class of taxpayers to 

2 whom the question is to be asked, and 

3 (C) describes the circumstances that would 

4 be required to exist before the question would 

5 be asked. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 25, 

2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

__________________________ LISA BROOKS CARLSON , Petitioner
,

v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT , Respondent

.

__________________________
201 3- 31 12

__________________________ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Prote ction Board in No. DC831E130148 -I-1.

_____________________________ ON MOTION

______________________________ O R D E R Upon consideration of the Office of Personnel Ma nagement ’s motion to electronically file its principal brief out of time,
I T I S O RDERED T HAT : The motion is granted. Case: 13-3112 Document: 24 Page: 1 Filed: 10/10/2013CARLSON V

. OPM 2
F OR T HE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk

s27 Case: 13-3112 Document: 24 Page: 2 Filed: 10/10/2013
<PAGE>
Exhibit 10q


                                  [LESCO LOGO]
                        RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT
================================================================================
[Date]

[Name of Grantee]
[Address]
[Address]

Dear [Grantee]:

You have been selected as one of a very limited number of management-level
associates to be granted a Restricted Stock Award (the "Award") by the Board of
Directors of LESCO, Inc. (the "Company") of [grant #] common shares (the
"Shares") of the Company, under The LESCO, Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (the
"Plan") effective [date]. As a key member of LESCO's management team, we want to
keep you focused on our strategic business objectives over the next three years
(i.e., the RESTRICTION PERIOD). The Restriction Period with respect to the
Shares will end on [date].

The certificate for the Shares will be legended pursuant to the provisions of
the Plan and will be held by the Company for your benefit until the expiration
of the Restriction Period. During the Restriction Period, you will be entitled
to full voting rights and all dividends, if and to the extent paid by the
Company, with respect to the Shares. Upon the expiration of the Restriction
Period, the Company will cause the removal of the legend from the certificate
representing the Shares and release the Shares to you.

The granting of the Award and your ownership of the Shares shall not interfere
with or limit in any way the right of the Company or any Subsidiary to terminate
your employment at any time, nor does the Plan confer upon you any right to
continued employment with the Company or any Subsidiary.

The Award and the Shares are subject to all terms, conditions and limitations of
the Plan, which are hereby incorporated by reference into this Restricted Stock
Award Agreement. This Restricted Stock Award Agreement shall be governed by and
construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Ohio. By accepting this
Award and the Shares and signing below, you acknowledge receipt of a copy of the
Plan and you agree to be bound by its terms and conditions.

You are receiving two originals of this Restricted Stock Award Agreement. Please
sign both. You must return a signed original to David Ratajczak in the Human
Resources Department to indicate your acceptance of the Award. You should retain
the other original for your records. You will not be deemed to have become a
Participant, or to have any rights with respect to the Award, until and unless
you have executed and returned this Restricted Stock Award Agreement and
otherwise complied with the applicable terms and conditions of the Plan.

                                          LESCO, INC.


-------------------------------           ------------------------------
[Grantee]                                 Michael P. DiMino
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer