alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2449 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2449

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To authorize the President to extend the term of the Agreement for 
Cooperation between the Government of the United States of America and 
   the Government of the Republic of Korea Concerning Civil Uses of 
       Nuclear Energy for a period not to exceed March 19, 2016.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO EXTEND THE UNITED STATES-REPUBLIC OF KOREA 
              NUCLEAR COOPERATION AGREEMENT.

    The President is authorized to extend the term of the Agreement for 
Cooperation between the Government of the United States of America and 
the Government of the Republic of Korea Concerning Civil Uses of 
Nuclear Energy for a period not to exceed March 19, 2016, 
notwithstanding any other provision of law.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 17, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2449

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To authorize the President to extend the term of the Agreement for 
Cooperation between the Government of the United States of America and 
   the Government of the Republic of Korea Concerning Civil Uses of 
       Nuclear Energy for a period not to exceed March 19, 2016.
```
| 1.   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      November 4, 2009 | By:    | /s/  Michael      C. Linn       |
|----------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|                             |   | Michael      C. Linn                      |
|                             |   | Chairman      and Chief Executive Officer |
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Frederick C. Herbst, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of Clayton Holdings, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) [Paragraphomitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained in SEC ReleaseNo. 34-47986];

 

(c) Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(d) Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| Date: May 15, 2006 |                      |
|-------------------------|---------------------------|
|                    | /s/ Frederick C. Herbst   |
|                    | Frederick C. Herbst       |
| * *                | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Leroy Thorpe, Appellant.

[813 NYS2d 912]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Ohlig, J.), dated September 8, 2004, which, upon his consent, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see *Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Florio, J.P., Santucci, Mastro, Rivera and Covello, JJ., concur.
149 So.2d 768

#### PLACID OIL COMPANY et al. v. A. M. DUPONT CORPORATION et al.

No. 46554.

Feb. 18, 1963.

. It is ordered that the writ of review issue ; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant he notified.
ZQ 1^ Scp 1 8PM 2: 1.^ 

Lawrence M. Ziemba 

Ececutive Vice President 

Refining, Projects & Procurement 

Phillips 66 

3010 Briarpark Drrive, PWC-09-9120 

Houston, TX 77042 

phone 832.765.6469 a fax 918.977.8041 

VIA CERTIFIED MAIL	

EX- ,tT,^T 

September 13, 2013 

The Honorable Gina McCarthy 

Administrator 

United States Environmental Protection Agency 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, D.C. 20460 

Re: Petition for Partial Waiver of 2014 Renewable Fuel Standard 

Dear Administrator McCarthy: 

Phillips 66 Company respectfully submits this petition to the U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) requesting a partial waiver of the applicable 2014 Renewable Fuel Standard 

volumes. Under the provisions of the Clean Air Act (subsection 211(o)(7)), the Administrator 

may waive the RFS requirements in whole or in part on petition by any person subject to the 

requirements. Phillips 66 Company is an obligated party under the provisions of the Renewable 

Fuel Standard regulations (40 CFR Part 80, Subpart M) and is therefore subject to the 

requirements of the program. 

Phillips 66 Company is also a member of both the American Petroleum Institute (API) and the 

American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers (AFPM). API and AFPM recently filed a joint 

petition requesting a partial waiver of the 2014 RFS volumes. Existing EPA administrative and 

judicial precedent makes clear that both API and AFPM have standing to file an RFS waiver 

petition. Notwithstanding, Phillips 66 Company's submittal incorporates by reference the RFS 

waiver petition filed jointly by API and AFPM on August 13, 2013. 

Absent waiver action from the EPA, the RFS will result in inadequate domestic supplies of 

gasoline and diesel fuel and severe economic harm to consumers and the economy. Phillips 66 

Company urges the EPA to grant the waiver as petitioned jointly by API and AFPM. 

Respectfully submitted, 

LMZ:sal
I	 F!]:f/I^I^111'//!11^ 

^

PHILLIPS 

• • 

Phillips66	

7001 0320 0003 1634 9625 

3010 Briarpark Drive 

9th Floor Pinnacle 

Houston, TX 77042

RECEIVED sEP 1 5 2011 

P A Mal1 

Route E 

M^GarthY,C''^na	

N°R.1 N 

Mailstop

1Ap1PA 

^^^^1^^1111^MM11111^^t^11^1^I1^1^1^
AITORNEY GENERAL 

OFTEXAS 

Mr. C. P. Lockhart, Chairman 

Board of Insurance Cotiissioners 

Austin, Texas 

Dear Sir: 

Opinion No. o-.4596 

Re: Merger of Teachers Annuity 

Life Insurance Company and 

Texas State Life Insurance 

CompanyYou have submitted to us for approval certain documents designed to effect 

a merger of the Teachers Annuity Life Insurance Company and the Texas 

State Life Insurance Company. We refuse to approve said documents for 

the following reason: 

Article 5040, Vernon's Revised Civil Statutes, authorizes, under certain 

conditions, the consolidation or merger of two or more insurance companies 

"previously organized under the laws of this State." In the opini~on of this 

Department, the privilege of consolidetin g or merging is extended only to 

insurance companies lawfully organized under the laws of Texas. 

In our opinion No. O-4237, we advised you that real estate, encumbered 

or not, could not under Article 4720 constitute the cap-ltal stock in 

whole or in part of a life insurance company upon orl.ginal incorporation; 

that the capital stock of the company at that time must consist of “cash 

or securities" of the class in which such corporations are authorized by 

Article 4723 to invest their funds. 

At the time of the chartering and the issuance of first certificate of 

authority to do business to the Teachers Annuity Life Insurance Company, 

its capital stock consisted of mortgaged real estate. A suit by the 

State against the Teachers Annuity Life Insurance Company is presently 

pending in the 53rd District Court of Travis County, wherein this fact 

is alleged and the court requested to declare the charter of such 

company to be void. 

Under these circumstances, we are of opinton that the law does not 

authorize the Teachers Annuity Life Insurance Company, not lawfully 

organized -under the laws of Texas, to consolidate or merge with 

another insurance company. 
Mr. 0. P. Lockhart, Page 2 O-4:96 

In view of this situation, we do not find it necessary to express an 

opinion upon other questions relatin, 0to the proposed merger or 

consolidation. 

The documents enclosed with your letter are returned herewith. 

Yours very truly 

ATTORNEY GENERALOF TEXAS 

s/ R. W. Fairchild 

BY 

R. W. Fairchild 

Assistant 

RWF:L&l/ldw 

ENCMSURE 

APPROVEzD JUN 2, 1942 

s/ Gerald. C. Mann 

ATTORNEX GENERAL OF TEXAS 

APPROVED 

OPINION COMMIYXE 

BY B. W. B. 

CHAIRMAN
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Southern Trust Securities Holding Corp., Inc. (the “Corporation”) certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and the information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.





Date: May 16, 2011
By:
/s/Robert EscobioName: Robert EscobioTitle:   Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer











This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document, and may not be disclosed, distributed or used by any person for any reason other than as specifically required by law.
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Annual  Report of  Transnational  Industries,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form  10-KSB/A-1  for the period ended  January 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Paul L. Dailey,  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.


/s/ Paul L. Dailey
------------------
Paul L. Dailey
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Dated: May 30, 2003

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Transnational Industries, Inc. and will be retained by Transnational
Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERS CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Brooke Credit Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ending September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Andrea F. Bielsker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 6, 2007



/S/ Andrea F. BielskerAndrea F. BielskerChief Financial Officer
98-1134.

#### Vickers v. Howe.

Morgan App. No. 96CA07. Qn appeal of Karen Vickers and cross-appeal of Steven D. Howe, D.O. Discretionary appeal and cross-appeal allowed.
#### Cafi Textiles, Inc., Respondent, v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company et al., Appellants.

Judgment in favor of plaintiff in this action to recover under two burglary insurance policies issued by defendants unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, and a new trial ordered, with $50 costs and disbursements to abide the event. The verdict is against the weight of the evidence on both the issues of liability and damages. Also, the record is silent as to who was the person or persons who first opened plaintiff’s premises on the morning following the alleged “ burglary ” and what they found. Concur—Stevens, J. P., Steuer, Capozzoli, McNally and Witmer, JJ.
#### § 28.917 Limitations of Services.

The Director, or an authorized representative, may suspend, terminate, or withhold cotton classing and market news services to any producer upon any failure of the producer to comply with the act or these regulations. Failure to remit fees for classification services shall result in loss of service.
#### § 29.6031 Packing.

A lot of tobacco consisting of a number of packages submitted as one definite unit for sampling or inspection. It is represented to contain the same kind of tobacco and has a common identification number or mark on each package.
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2014 - 0289 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 3 -NM - 1 46 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: 

### 13 - AD - 41 **Next Step:** F RAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, list latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comm ents received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Man ager**  **Date**
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

(Tallahassee Division)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 4:01cv238SPM

 )

COASTAL LUMBER COMPANY, )

)

Defendant. )

)

ORDER 

TERMINATING CONSENT DECREE

AND NOW, this 29th day of May, 2007, upon consideration of the Joint Motion

to Terminate Consent Decree (doc. 120) filed by the Parites, good cause existing

therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Consent Decree is TERMINATED and this

case is hereby CLOSED.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 4:01-cv-00238-SPM-AK Document 121 Filed 05/29/07 Page 1 of 1
J-S32029-17

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT

OF

PENNSYLVANIA

Appellant

v.

KRISTEN HORN

Appellee No. 2183 EDA 2016

Appeal from the Order Entered June 10, 2016

In the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County

Criminal Division at No: CP-51-CR-0012270-2015

BEFORE: GANTMAN, P.J., STABILE, and FITZGERALD,* JJ.

JUDGMENT ORDER BY STABILE, J.: FILED DECEMBER 21, 2017

Appellant, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, appeals from the June 

10, 2016 order dismissing charges against Appellee Kristen Horn. We vacate 

and remand. 

The trial court summarized the pertinent facts and procedural history: 

On November 17, 2015, [Appellee] was stopped due to 

having significant damage to her vehicle’s windows and using 

cloth to cover up said damage. When the vehicle was stopped, 

[Appellee] was sitting in the passenger seat while someone with 

a suspended license was in the driver’s seat. Due to this traffic 

violation, the police officer then began to effectuate a live stop. 

As a result of being ordered out of the car to effect this live stop, 

a silver revolver with a black grip became visible from under the 

passenger seat as [Appellee] exited the vehicle. [Appellee] was 

both issued a traffic violation report (TVR), for allowing her vehicle 

to be driven by an unlicensed driver, and arrested for the alleged 

Violation of the Uniform Firearms Act (VUFA). During the 

____________________________________________

* Former Justice specially assigned to the Superior Court.
J-S32029-17

- 2 -

pendency of the VUFA charges, an adjudication for the traffic 

violation was held on January 19, 2016, in which [Appellee] was 

found not guilty in absentia. 

Trial Court Opinion, 8/11/16, at 1-2. 

The trial court dismissed the remaining charges against Appellee under 

18 Pa.C.S.A. § 110 because they arose out of the same criminal episode and 

occurred within the same judicial district as the traffic violation for which 

Appellee was found guilty in absentia. Indeed, § 110 normally bars a 

subsequent prosecution where a former prosecution, arising out of the same 

facts or criminal episode, resulted in an acquittal or conviction in the same 

judicial district. 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 110(1)(ii). In Commonwealth v. Perfetto, 

169 A.3d 1114 (Pa. Super. 2017)(en banc), however, this Court delineated an 

exception to § 110’s compulsory joinder requirement unique to Philadelphia 

County. Under Perfetto, a former prosecution for a summary traffic offense 

within the jurisdiction of the traffic division of the Philadelphia Municipal Court 

does not bar a subsequent prosecution arising out of the same facts or criminal 

episode. In light of Perfetto, the trial court erred in dismissing the DUI 

charges under § 110. We therefore vacate and remand for further 

proceedings. 

Order vacated. Case remanded. Jurisdiction relinquished. 
J-S32029-17

- 3 -

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq.

Prothonotary

Date: 12/21/2017
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO.: 4:02cr34-SPM

MICHAEL WHITE,

Defendant.

______________________________/

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REDUCE UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 3582

This cause comes before the Court on Defendant Michael White’s motion

to reduce sentence under 18 U.S.C. §3582(c) and Amendment 750 to the

Sentencing Guidelines. Doc. 50. The Government filed a response in

opposition. Doc. 53.

Upon review, the Court finds that Defendant is not entitled to a sentence

reduction. Application of the amendment results in no change to Defendant’s

sentencing range, which was determined by the career offender enhancement. 

Since the sentencing range has not changed, the Court is not authorized to order

a reduction. United States v. Moore, 541 F.3d 1323, 1327-30 (11th Cir. 2008). 

 Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the motion for reduction of sentence

(doc. 34) is denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 17th day of January, 2011

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

Case 4:02-cr-00034-MCR Document 54 Filed 01/17/12 Page 1 of 1