alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
3.909-1 Prohibition.       (a)                    						            The Government is prohibited from using fiscal year 2015 and subsequent fiscal year funds for a contract with an entity that requires employees or subcontractors of such entity seeking to report waste, fraud, or abuse to sign internal confidentiality agreements or statements prohibiting or otherwise restricting such employees or subcontractors from lawfully reporting such waste, fraud, or abuse to a designated investigative or law enforcement representative of a Federal department or agency authorized to receive such information. See section 743 of Division E, Title VII, of the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2015 (Pub. L. 113-235) and its successor provisions in subsequent appropriations acts (and as extended in continuing resolutions.)                                          (b)                    						            The prohibition in paragraph (a) of this section does not contravene requirements applicable to Standard Form 312 (Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement), Form 4414 (Sensitive Compartmented Information Nondisclosure Agreement), or any other form issued by a Federal department or agency governing the nondisclosure of classified information.    **Parent topic:** 3.909 Prohibition on providing funds to an entity that requires certain internal confidentiality agreements or statements.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2299 

To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance 

Act to restore Federal aid for the repair, restoration, and replacement 

of private nonprofit educational facilities that are damaged or destroyed 

by a major disaster. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2006 

Ms. LANDRIEU introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act to restore Federal aid for the repair, restoration, and replacement of private nonprofit 

educational facilities that are damaged or destroyed by 

a major disaster. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPAIR, RESTORATION, AND REPLACEMENT OF 

4 DAMAGED PRIVATE NONPROFIT EDU5 CATIONAL FACILITIES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 406(a)(3)(B) of the Rob7 ert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•S 2299 IS

1 Act (42 U.S.C. 5172(a)(3)(B)) is amended by inserting 

2 ‘‘education,’’ after ‘‘communications,’’. 

3 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by sub4 section (a) shall apply with respect to any major disaster 

5 declaration made on or after August 28, 2005. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
# 4.101 Contracting officer’s signature.

Only *contracting officers**shall* sign contracts on behalf of the *United States*. The *contracting officer*’s name and official title *shall* be typed, stamped, or printed on the contract. The *contracting officer* normally signs the contract after it has been signed by the contractor. The *contracting officer**shall* ensure that the signer(s) have authority to bind the contractor (see specific requirements in 4.102 of this subpart).

**Parent topic:**Subpart 4.1 - Contract Execution
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-92,937-01

EX PARTE AUGUSTIN PINEDA, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 3696-A IN THE 100 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM HALL COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant pleaded guilty to aggravated assault and was sentenced to eighteen years’

imprisonment. Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of

conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. SeeTEX.CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends that his original guilty plea was involuntary because trial counsel failed

to explain the consequences of pleading guilty to deferred adjudication. Applicant has alleged facts

that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52 (1985); Ex parte Argent, 393

S.W.3d 781 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court

is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial

court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. In developing the record, the trial
2

court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing,

it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented

by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX. CODE

CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately notify

this Court of counsel’s name.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whethertrial counsel’s

performance was deficient and Applicant would have insisted on a trial but for counsel’s alleged

deficient performance. The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems

appropriate in response to Applicant’s claim.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX.R.APP.P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.

Filed: August 25, 2021

Do not publish
```

[Federal Register: March 5, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 43)]
[Notices]               
[Page 10228-10229]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr05mr10-33]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION

 
Publication of State Plan Pursuant to the Help America Vote Act; 
Correction

AGENCY: U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC).

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Election Assistance Commission published a document 
in the Federal Register on February 10, 2010, concerning Puerto Rico's 
amended State plan. The document contained the wrong States.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bryan Whitener, 202-566-3100.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of February 10, 2010, in the FR Doc. 2010-
2919, on page 6643, in the second and third

[[Page 10229]]

column, correct the SUMMARY caption to read:
    SUMMARY: Pursuant to sections 254(a)(11)(A) and 255(b) of the Help 
America Vote Act (HAVA), Public Law 107-252, the U.S. Election 
Assistance Commission (EAC) hereby causes to be published in the 
Federal Register changes to the HAVA State plans previously submitted 
by Puerto Rico.

    Dated: March 2, 2010.
Thomas R. Wilkey,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2010-4707 Filed 3-4-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
#### § 3203.7 Title.

Title of ownership to excess computers or other technical equipment transferred under this part shall automatically pass to the recipient once the transferring agency and recipient or designated organization sign the transfer form indicating that the designated organization has received the property.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with this Quarterly Report of Analytica Bio-Energy Corp., on Form 10-Q for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Luiz Brasil, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2014, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and June 30, 2014 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Analytica Bio-Energy Corp.  October 20, 2014By:/s/ Luiz BrasilLuiz BrasilPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
#### § 28.57 Form C certificate.

When classification has been made of cotton inspected and sampled under supervision of a Division employee there shall be issued a cotton class certificate known as a Form C certificate. Each Form C certificate shall show the true classification of the cotton in the respects specified in the request. Such certificate, when it has been once reviewed in accordance with § 28.66, shall be deemed to be a final certificate as to the classification shown, within the meaning of section 4 of the Act (42 Stat. 1517; 7 U.S.C. 54), in all cases except when superseded by a certificate or award made as provided in § 28.161.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 24, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 71785]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29603]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Escalate Capital Partners SBIC I, L.P., License No. 06/06-0335; 
Notice Seeking Exemption Under Section 312 of the Small Business 
Investment Act, Conflicts of Interest

    Notice is hereby given that Escalate Capital Partners, SBIC I, 
L.P., 300 W. 6th Street, Suite 2250, Austin, TX 78701, a Federal 
Licensee under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended 
(``the Act''), in connection with the financing of a small concern, has 
sought an exemption under Section 312 of the Act and Section 107.730, 
Financings which Constitute Conflicts of Interest of the Small Business 
Administration (``SBA'') Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.730). 
Escalate Capital Partners, SBIC I, L.P. proposes to provide debt 
security financing to WhaleShark Media, Inc., 515 S. Congress Avenue, 
Suite 700, Austin, TX 78704. The financing is contemplated to provide 
capital for operations and contingent payments to prior acquisitions.
    The financing is brought within the purview of Sec.  107.730(a)(1) 
of the Regulations because AV-EC Partners I, L.P., an Associate of 
Escalate Capital Partners, SBIC I, L.P., owns more than ten percent of 
WhaleShark Media, Inc. Therefore, this transaction is considered a 
financing of an Associate requiring an exemption.
    Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit 
written comments on the transaction within fifteen days of the date of 
this publication to the Associate Administrator for Investment, U.S. 
Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20416.

    Dated: November 17, 2010.
Sean Greene,
Associate Administrator for Investment.
[FR Doc. 2010-29603 Filed 11-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
# 7.107-6 Solicitation provision.

The *contracting officer**shall* insert the provision at 52.207-6, *Solicitation* of *Offers* from Small Business Concerns and *Small Business Teaming Arrangements* or Joint Ventures (*Multiple-Award Contracts*), in *solicitations* for *multiple-award contracts* above the substantial *bundling* threshold of the agency (see 7.107-4(a)).

**Parent topic:**7.107 Additional requirements for acquisitions involving consolidation, bundling, or substantial bundling.
Board of
Directors


Sino Gas
International Holdings, Inc.






Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




We hereby
consent to your reference of our reviewed report dated April 30, 2010 on the
consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
and for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, of Sino Gas
International Holdings, Inc., from the Company’s Quarter Report on Form
10-Q.





For the
purpose of the aforesaid Form 10-Q, we also consent to the reference of our firm
as "Experts" under the Experts' caption, which, in so far as applicable to our
firm means accounting experts.












South
      San Francisco, California
            Samuel
      H. Wong & Co., LLPMay
      13, 2010
            Certified
      Public Accountants
Case 4:00-cv-00293-WS Document 2 Filed 08/15/00 Page 1 of 2
Case 4:00-cv-00293-WS Document 2 Filed 08/15/00 Page 2 of 2
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 18, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-60725

Summary Calendar

 

JEAN A. DORIVAL,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition transferred

from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of New York

USDC No. 1:02-cv-06162-DGT

A91 420 735

--------------------

Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Haitian citizen Jean Dorival filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2241

petition for writ of habeas corpus in district court for the

Eastern District of New York challenging the Immigration Judge’s

order of removal from the United States. In his petition he

asserted a claim that he was a national of the United States. 

The district court transferred Dorival’s habeas corpus petition

to this court. Dorival requests a stay of removal; that request
No. 03-60725

-2-

is DENIED. The Respondent, Attorney General Ashcroft, moves for

dismissal of the case for lack of jurisdiction and, in the

alternative, for summary affirmance. Ashcroft’s motion for

summary affirmance is DENIED. Dorival moves for leave to file an

out-of-time response to Ashcroft’s motion for summary affirmance;

Dorival’s motion is DENIED.

28 U.S.C. § 1631 permits a transfer if this court would have

been able to exercise jurisdiction on the date that the case was

filed in the district court, the district court lacked

jurisdiction over the case, and the transfer is in the interest

of justice. Dorival filed his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition in the

district court before he exhausted his administrative remedies

before the Board of Immigration Appeals. Therefore, this court

could not have exercised jurisdiction over the petition on the

date that Dorival filed the petition in district court. See

Goonsuwan v. Ashcroft, 252 F.3d 383, 387 (5th Cir. 2001); 8

U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1) (a court may review a final order of removal

only if the alien has exhausted all administrative remedies as of

right).

DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

BRADLEY E. KLINE,

Respondent

v.

TRAVELERS PERSONAL SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 71 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 20th day of July, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
EXHIBIT 13.1 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*  In connection with the annual report of North American Nickel Inc. (formerly Widescope Resources Inc.) (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Keith Morrison, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. the Report containing the financial statements of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: April 18, 2017  /s/ Keith Morrison Keith Morrison Chief Executive Officer  * A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS

*April 20, 2006*

[Cite as *04/20/2006 Case Announcements,*2006-Ohio-1911.]

*1414MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2005-1966.

#### In re A. B.

Summit App. No. 22659, 2005-Ohio-4936. This cause is pending before the court on the certification of a conflict involving parental rights or adoption from the Court of Appeals for Summit County. Upon consideration of the joint motion of amicus curiae Justice for Children Project and appellee Charles Brown for divided argument time,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion is granted, and the amicus curiae shall share the time allotted to appellee.
#### § 35.17 Service of notice or order.

Service of any notice or order required by the Act or prescribed by the regulations in this part shall be deemed sufficient if made personally upon the person served, by registered mail, or by leaving a copy of such notice or order with an employee or agent at such person's usual place of business or abode or with any member of his immediate family at his place of abode. If the person named is a partnership, association, or corporation, service may similarly be made by service on any member of the partnership or any officer, employee, or agent of the association or corporation.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Section 906 Certification**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C. Section 1350), the undersigned officer of Centennial Bank Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: May 8, 2007 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAdvances and directions of ion nitriding/carburizingIon nitriding and carburizing are plasma activated thermodynamic processes for the production of case hardened surface layers not only for ferrous materials, but also for an increasing number of nonferrous metals. When the treatment variables are properly controlled, the use of nitrogenous or carbonaceous glow discharge medium offers great flexibility in tailoring surface/near-surface properties independently of the bulk properties. The ion nitriding process has reached a high level of maturity and has gained wide industrial acceptance, while the more recently introduced ion carburizing process is rapidly gaining industrial acceptance. The current status of plasma mass transfer mechanisms into the surface regarding the formation of compound and diffusion layers in ion nitriding and carbon build-up ion carburizing is reviewed. In addition, the recent developments in design and construction of advanced equipment for obtaining optimized and controlled case/core properties is summarized. Also, new developments and trends such as duplex plasma treatments and alternatives to dc diode nitriding are highlighted.Document ID19900002586Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsSpalvins, Talivaldis*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 1989Subject CategoryEngineering (General)Report/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:102398E-5148NASA-TM-102398Meeting InformationMeeting: International Ion Nitriding/Carburizing ConferenceLocation: Cincinnati, OHCountry: United StatesStart Date: September 18, 1989End Date: September 20, 1989Sponsors:ASMAccession Number90N11902Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-43-1CDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900002586.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
RECONSIDERATION DOCKET

97-1516.

#### Balatgek v. State Farm Ins. Co.

Franklin App. No. 96APE12-1619. Reported at 82 Ohio St.3d 384, 696 N.E.2d 566. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., dissent.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Linking legacies[electronic resource] : connecting the Cold War nuclear weapons productionprocesses to their environmental consequences.
 
SuDoc:E 1.90/3:0319
ItemNumber 0474-B-06 (online):
CGPsystem Number: 000576745
 
Cover
Introduction and Cover
Chapter 1
Chapter 2
Chapter 3
Chapter 4
Chapter 5
Chapter 6
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Appendix D
Appendix E
Glossary
 
 **
4.904 Reporting payment information to the IRS.       26 U.S.C. 6041 and 6041 A, as implemented in 26 CFR, in part, require payors, including Government agencies, to report to the IRS, on Form 1099, payments made to certain contractors. 26 U.S.C. 6109 requires a contractor to provide its TIN if a Form 1099 is required. The payment office is responsible for submitting reports to the IRS.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 4.9 - Taxpayer Identification Number Information
#### § 2903.20 Reporting requirements.

The award document will give instructions regarding the submission of progress reports, including the frequency and required contents of the reports.