alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32 

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to 

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 

as Adopted Pursuant to 

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BlackRock Capital Investment Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), James E. Keenan, as Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael Pungello, as Interim Chief Financial Officer and Interim Treasurer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of operations of the Company. 

 

|                              |                                                       |
|------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                         |                                                  |
| /s/ James E. Keenan

   |
| Name:                        | James E. Keenan                                       |
| Title:                       | Interim Chief Executive Officer                       |
| Date:                        | October 30, 2019                                      |
|                         |
| /s/ Michael Pungello

  |
| Name:                        | Michael Pungello                                      |
| Title:                       | Interim Chief Financial Officer and Interim Treasurer |
| Date:                        | October 30, 2019                                      |
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2562 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2562

   To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to implement a certain 
  interim final or final rule regarding nutrition programs under the 
 Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act and the Child Nutrition 
                              Act of 1966.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 27, 2013

  Mr. Polis (for himself, Ms. DeLauro, Mr. McGovern, and Mr. Rangel) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                      Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize the Secretary of Agriculture to implement a certain 
  interim final or final rule regarding nutrition programs under the 
 Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act and the Child Nutrition 
                              Act of 1966.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``School Lunch Improvements for 
Children's Education Act'' or the ``SLICE Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION FOR THE SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE TO IMPLEMENT A 
              CERTAIN INTERIM FINAL OR FINAL RULE.

    The Secretary of Agriculture may implement an interim final or 
final rule regarding nutrition programs under the Richard B. Russell 
National School Lunch Act (42 U.S.C. 1751 et seq.) and the Child 
Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1771 et seq.) that--
            (1) requires crediting of tomato paste and puree based on 
        volume;
            (2) implements science-based sodium reduction targets; and
            (3) establishes a whole grain requirement.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - 40 CFR Part 261
          - [EPA-R06-RCRA-2010-0066; SW FRL-9231-4]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

Withdrawal of direct final exclusion.

# SUMMARY:

Because EPA received adverse comments, we are withdrawing the direct final exclusion for ExxonMobil Refining and Supply Company—Beaumont Refinery, published on October 1, 2010.

# DATES:

Effective November 24, 2010, EPA withdraws the direct final exclusion published at 75 FR 60632, on October 1, 2010.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Michelle Peace, Environmental Protection Agency, Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division, RCRA Branch, Mail Code: 6PD-C, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, TX 75202, by                               ( print page 71560)                            calling (214) 665-7430 or by e-mail at                         *peace.michelle@epa.gov*.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Because EPA received adverse comments, we are withdrawing the direct final exclusion for ExxonMobil Refining and Supply Company—Beaumont Refinery, published on October 1, 2010, 75 FR 60632. We stated that in the direct final rule that if we received adverse comment by November 1, 2010, the direct final rule would not take effect and we would publish a timely withdrawal in the                     **Federal Register**                    . We subsequently received adverse comment on that direct final rule. We will address the comments submitted in a subsequent final action which will be based on the parallel proposed rule also published on October 1, 2010, 75 FR 60689. As stated in the direct final rule and the parallel proposed rule, we will not institute a second comment period on this action.                

Dated: November 16, 2010.

Bill Luthans,

Acting Director, Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division.

Accordingly, the amendments to the rule published on October 1, 2010, 75 FR 60632 are withdrawn as of November 24, 2010 until an action making the exclusion final is published.

[FR Doc. 2010-29630 Filed 11-23-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 224 (Monday, November 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 71122]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29313]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. NJ11-4-000]


City of Vernon, CA; Notice of Filing

November 15, 2010.
    Take notice that on November 2, 2010, the City of Vernon, 
California submitted, with supporting documentation, the annual 
revision to its Transmission Revenue Balancing Account Adjustment and 
the Transmission Revenue Requirement, to be effective in calendar year 
2011.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8acccfd8c9c5e4e6e3e4efd9fffafae5f8fecaeceff8e9a4ede5fc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2a6c6f786965444643444f795f5a5a45585e6a4c4f5849044d455c">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on November 23, 2010.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-29313 Filed 11-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Amendment to Management Services Agreement



 Exhibit 10.8.1 
  
 AMENDMENT TO 
 MANAGEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT 
  
 THIS AMENDMENT
TO MANAGEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT, dated as of March 7, 2005 (this “Amendment”), is entered into by and between FREIGHTCAR AMERICA, INC. (formerly known as Rabbit Hill Holdings, Inc.), a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”), and HANCOCK MEZZANINE PARTNERS L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“Hancock”). 
  
 RECITALS: 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company and Hancock are parties to that certain Management Services Agreement, dated as of June 3, 1999 (the “Agreement”);
and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company and Hancock desire to amend certain
provisions in the Agreement relating to the termination of the Agreement, subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein. 
  
 NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
  
 1. Definitions. All capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Agreement. 
  
 2. Amendment. The Agreement is hereby amended by replacing Section 6
of the Agreement in its entirety to read as follows: 
  
 “Section 4. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by Hancock at any time by written notice to the Company. In addition, this Agreement will terminate automatically upon the termination of Hancock’s right to appoint
a member of the Company’s board of directors (the “Termination of Designation Right”); provided, however, that if an initial public offering of the Company’s common stock (the “IPO”) shall have occurred
prior to the Termination of Designation Right, this Agreement shall terminate automatically upon the payment of a termination fee of $50,000 to Hancock, which amount shall be payable promptly following the completion of the IPO. The provisions of
Sections 3 and 4 shall survive any termination of this Agreement.” 
  
 3. No Further Amendments. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. Each party agrees to be bound by all of the terms of the Agreement, as amended hereby. 
  
 4. Miscellaneous. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each
of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.

  

			
	 FREIGHTCAR AMERICA, INC.

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Kevin P. Bagby


	 Name:
	 	Kevin P. Bagby
	 Title:
	 	Chief Financial Officer
	
	 HANCOCK MEZZANINE PARTNERS L.P.

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Scott A. McFetridge


	 Name:
	 	Scott A. McFetridge
	 Title:
	 	Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET, THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS, AND THE STATMENT OF CASH FLOWS AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                          48,071
<SECURITIES>                                    72,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   62,396
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    170,095
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               364,653
<PP&E>                                       2,915,937
<DEPRECIATION>                               (141,901)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,783,194
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          754,074
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        794
<COMMON>                                        45,186
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,641,192
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,783,194
<SALES>                                      1,250,627
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,250,627
<CGS>                                           88,787
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,025,460
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,817
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                225,167
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            225,167
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   225,167
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01


</TABLE>
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 1:94-cr-01036-MP

JAMES R YOUNG,

Defendant.

___________________________/

O R D E R 

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 112, Motion for Designation of Federal Sentence

by James R Young. After being sentenced to 262 months in federal prison, the defendant was

sentenced to 15 years in the state prison system. In the motion, the defendant seeks to have the

Court designate the state facility as the location for serving his federal sentence, effectively

making the sentences concurrent. The government responded, doc. 115, and the defendant,

through counsel, replied, doc. 116.

The Court agrees with the government that the defendant moves the Court to enter a

province reserved for the Bureau of Prisons. “A request for credit for prior custody under 18

U.S.C. 3585(b)(2) must be made, in the first instance, to the Attorney General through the

Bureau of Prisons upon imprisonment after sentencing.” Rogers v. United States, 180 F.3d 349,

358 (1st Cir.1999). See United States v. Wilson, 503 U.S. 329, 334 (1992). It is only after a

prisoner has exhausted potential remedies under the Bureau of Prisons Administrative Remedies

Program that he may seek judicial review. Id., at 357.

Moreover, even if the defendant had exhausted administrative remedies, the Court would

deny this motion. The Court is aware that Bureau of Prisons officials dealing with a request such

Case 1:94-cr-01036-MW-GRJ Document 117 Filed 09/22/05 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 1:94-cr-01036-MP

as the one in this case typically send a letter to the Court asking if running the sentences

concurrently would go against the sentencing considerations of the Court. Or as the defendant

put it, "Had this court known that in a matter of two months the State of Florida would impose a

15 year State sentence on the defendant, would the court have announced the federal sentence

concurrent?" The undersigned finds that consecutively served sentences are consistent with the

sentencing considerations at 18 U.S.C. § 3553, et seq. Accordingly, the motion at doc. 112 is

denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of September, 2005

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:94-cr-01036-MW-GRJ Document 117 Filed 09/22/05 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                          CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectuses 
constituting part of the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 33-63350, 
33-52517, 33-57049, 33-64449, 333-11395, 333-11397 and 333-50725) and in the 
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-10621, 33-21756, 33-34288, 
33-48858, 33-54233 and 33-28981) of United Asset Management Corporation of 
our report dated February 3, 1998 appearing on page 59 of the Annual Report 
to Stockholders which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.  





/s/ Price Waterhouse LLP
------------------------
Price Waterhouse LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
April 30, 1998


                                          F-2
#### § 3570.71 Strategic economic and community development.

Applicants with projects that support the implementation of Strategic Community Investment Plans are encouraged to review and consider 7 CFR part 1980, subpart K, which contains provisions for providing priority to projects that support the implementation of Strategic Community Investment Plans on a multi-jurisdictional and multi-sectoral basis.

[85 FR 59395, Sept. 22, 2020]
Exhibit
                32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant
      to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned
      officer of O2 Secure Wireless, Inc., a Georgia corporation (the “Company”), does
      hereby certify, to the best of his knowledge, that:




1. 
      This Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008 (the
      “Report”) of the Company complies in all material respects with the requirements
      of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
      and




2. 
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




/s/
      Craig
      Sellars                                                             
..


Craig
      Sellars, President and Chief Executive Officer





Date:
      Feburary 17, 2009
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 221 

For the relief of Luay Lufti Hadad. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 31, 2005 

Mr. LEVIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL

For the relief of Luay Lufti Hadad.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR LUAY 

4 LUFTI HADAD. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Luay Lufti Hadad shall be eligible for issuance of 

8 an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of 

9 an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon 

10 filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa 

11 under section 204 of that Act or for adjustment of status 

12 to lawful permanent resident. 
2

•S 221 IS

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Luay Lufti Hadad 

2 enters the United States before the filing deadline speci3 fied in subsection (c), Luay Lufti Hadad shall be consid4 ered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall be 

5 eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of the 

6 Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of enact7 ment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.—

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Luay Lufti Hadad, the Secretary of State shall 

16 instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the cur17 rent or next following fiscal year, the total number of im18 migrant visas that are made available to natives of the 

19 country of birth of Luay Lufti Hadad under section 

20 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if appli21 cable, the total number of immigrant visas that are made 

22 available to natives of the country of birth of Luay Lufti 

23 Hadad under section 202(e) of that Act.

Æ
98-1546.

#### State ex rel. LeMaster v. Pepple.

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
###### Editorial Note on Part 3402

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3402 appear at 76 FR 4807, Jan. 27, 2011.

#### § 3402.22 Access to peer review information.

After final decisions have been announced, HEP will, upon request, inform the PD of the reasons for its decision on an application. Verbatim copies of summary reviews, not including the identity of the reviewers, will be made available to respective PDs upon specific request.