alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 2500.102 Purpose. ( a ) The purpose of the OASDFR Program is to make competitive awards to provide outreach and technical assistance to encourage and assist socially disadvantaged farmers and ranchers in: ( 1 ) Owning and operating farms, ranches and non-industrial forest lands; and
( 2 ) In participating equitably in the full range of agricultural programs offered by the Department.
( b ) The OASDFR Program awards shall be used exclusively to: ( 1 ) Enhance coordination of the outreach, technical assistance, and education efforts authorized under agriculture programs;
( 2 ) Assist in reaching current and prospective socially disadvantaged farmers, ranchers or forest landowners in a linguistically appropriate manner; and
( 3 ) Improve the participation of those farmers and ranchers in agricultural programs.
#### § 2903.16 Organizational management information.

Specific management information relating to an applicant shall be submitted on a one-time basis as part of the responsibility determination prior to the award of a grant identified under this program, if such information has not been provided previously. Copies of forms recommended for use in fulfilling these requirements will be provided as part of the preaward process.
§ 3201.34 Carpet and upholstery cleaners. ( a ) *Definition.* ( 1 ) Cleaning products formulated specifically for use in cleaning carpets and upholstery, through a dry or wet process, found in locations such as houses, cars, and workplaces.
( 2 ) Carpet and upholstery cleaners for which preferred procurement applies are: ( i ) *General purpose cleaners.* Carpet and upholstery cleaners formulated for use in cleaning large areas such as the carpet in an entire room or the upholstery on an entire piece of furniture.
( ii ) *Spot removers.* Carpet and upholstery cleaners formulated for use in removing spots or stains in a small confined area.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The minimum biobased content for all carpet and upholstery cleaners shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product. The applicable minimum biobased contents are: ( 1 ) General purpose cleaners—54 percent.
( 2 ) Spot removers—7 percent.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than May 14, 2009, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased carpet and upholstery cleaners. By that date, Federal agencies that have the responsibility for drafting or reviewing specifications for items to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased carpet and upholstery cleaners.
[73 FR 27973, May 14, 2008]
2006-0770.

#### Weatherspoon v. Eberlin.

In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Seth A. Weatherspoon. Sua sponte, cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.
Amendment Number 10 to Group Purchasing Agreement



 Exhibit 10.31 
 PREMIER PURCHASING PARTNERS, L.P. 
 AMENDMENT NUMBER 10 TO GROUP PURCHASING AGREEMENT

 CONTRACT #: PP-NS-347 
 Product Category: Pulse Oximeters 
 Extension of Term 
 This Amendment Number 10 (“Amendment”), is entered into effective March 1, 2009 (the “Amendment Effective Date”), and shall
amend and modify the Group Purchasing Agreement (Contract #: PP-NS-347) by and between Premier Purchasing Partners, L.P. (“Purchasing Partners”), and Masimo Americas, Inc. (“Seller”), dated effective March 1, 2006 (the
“Agreement”), as follows: 
 1. Extension of Term of Contract. Article 1.0 of the Agreement is hereby amended such that the
term of the Agreement shall be extended until May 31, 2009 (the “Expiration Date”). The Agreement shall remain in effect until the Expiration Date, unless earlier terminated pursuant to the terms of the Agreement. 
 2. Other Terms and Conditions. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 
 This Amendment is hereby executed as of the Effective Date by the parties’ authorized representatives set forth below. 
  

																	
	PREMIER PURCHASING PARTNERS, L.P.	 		 		 		 		 	
	(“Purchasing Partners”)	 		 	 Masimo Americas, Inc.

		 		 		 		 		 	(“Seller”)
				
	By:	 	PREMIER PLANS, L.L.C.,	 		 	
		 	Its General Partner	 		 	
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Durral Gilbert
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Jim Beyer

	Printed Name:	 	 Durral Gilbert
	 		 	Printed Name:	 	 Jim Beyer

	Title:	 	 Vice President, Operations
	 		 	Title:	 	 Vice President, National Accounts

							
	By:	 	 /s/ Amy Denny
	 		 		 		 		 	
	Printed Name:	 	 Amy Denny
	 		 		 		 		 	
	Title:	 	 Vice President, Contract Management
	 		 		 		 		 	
							
	By:	 	 /s/ John W. Hargette
	 		 		 		 		 	
	Printed Name:	 	 John W. Hargette
	 		 		 		 		 	
	Title:	 	 Vice President, Sourcing
	 		 		 		 		 	

  

			
	Rev 10/05 DOCS 2827v2
	 PP:
	 	 Seller:
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 USC, SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

          In connection with the amended quarterly report of Northern Ethanol, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB/A for the six month period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated        below, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Dated: August 15, 2008 | s/ Gordon Laschinger_________________   |
|------------------------|----------------------------------------------|

|   | Gordon Laschinger, Chief Executive Officer |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S
O F T E X A S

NO. WR-51, 197-03

EX P ART E JAM ES AARON DYSON, Appl icant

ON AP P LI CAT I ON F OR A WRIT OF HAB EA S CORP US

CAUSE NO. C-4- W011479-0657742- C

I N CRIM I NAL DI STRI CT COURT NO. 4 F ROM TA RRANT COUNT Y

P er cur iam

. R I C H A R D S O N , J.
, f il ed a concur r ing opin ion in which H E R V E Y and

N E W E L L , JJ.
, joi ned. Y E A R Y , J.
, f il ed a diss enti ng opin ion in which K E L L E R , P

. J. and

S L A U G H T E R , J.
, joi ned.

O P I N I O N

P u r s uan t t o t h e pro v i s i o n s o f A

rt i cl e 11. 07 o f t h e T ex as Co de o f Cri m i n al Pr o cedure, t he

cl erk o f t h e t ri al co urt t ran s m i t t ed t o t h i s Co urt t h i s appl i cat i o n f o r a wri t o f h ab eas co rpus. E x par te

Y oung , 418 S. W

. 2d 824, 826 (T ex

. Cri m

. A pp. 1967). A

ppl i ca nt was co n

v i ct ed o f en gagi

n g i n

o rgan i zed cri

m i n al act i v i t y wi t h a f i rearm an d s en

t en ced t o f

i f t y y ears ’ i m pri s o n m en t

. A ppl i can t ’ s

co n v i ct i o n was af

f i rm ed o n appea l

. Dys on v. State, No

. 02-98- 0096-CR (T ex

. A pp. –Fo r t W o rt h

,

S e p t

. 1 6

, 1 9 9 9 ) ( n o t d e s i g n a t e d f o r p u b l i c a t i o n )

. A

ppl i can t f i l ed t h i s appl i cat i o n f

o r wri t o f

h ab eas co rpus i

n t h e co un

t y o f co n v i ct i o n , an d t h e di s t ri ct cl erk f o rwarded i

t t o t h i s Co urt

. See T E X

.2

C O D E C R I M

. P R O C

. art

. 11. 07.

A ppl i can t al l eges , am

o n g o t h er t h i

n gs , t h at

, b ut f

o r a wi t n es s ’ s m i s l eadi n g t ri al t es t i

mo n y ,

A ppl i can t wo ul d n o t h av e b een co n v i ct ed o f e n gagi

n g i n o rgan i zed cri

m e. He co n cede s t h at h e i s

gui l t y o f t h e l es s er- i

n cl uded o f f en s e o f aggrav at ed as s aul t wi t h a deadl y wea po n

. T E X P E N A L C O D E

§ 71. 02(a) ; W

alker v. State, 594 S. W

. 3d 330, 338 (T ex

. Cri m

. A pp. 2020).

T h e t ri al co urt

, af

t er h o l di n g a l i v e ev i den t i ary h eari n g, reco m m en ds rel i ef b e gr an

t ed. W e

agree. A ppl i can t i s en t i t l ed t o rel i ef

. E x par te Chane

y, 563 S. W

. 3d 239, 263-64 (T ex

. Cri m

. A pp.

2018); E x parte Chabot, 300 S. W

. 3d 768, 771-72) (T ex

. Cri m

. A pp. 2009).

Re l i ef i s gran

t ed. T h e j udgm en

t i n caus e n um b er 0657742D i

n t h e Cri m i n al Di s t ri ct Co urt

F o ur o f T arr ant C o u nt y i s s et as i de, an d A ppl i can t i s rem an ded t o t h e cus t o dy o f t h e Sh eri f f o f

T arr an t Co un t y t o an s wer t h e ch arges as s et o ut i n t h e i n di ct m en t

. T h e t ri a l c o u r t s ha l l i s s ue an y

n ece s s ary b en ch warran

t wi t h i n 10 day s af

t er t h e m an dat e o f t h i s Co urt i s s ues

.

Co pi es o f t h i s o pi

n i o n s h al l b e s en

t t o t h e T ex as Depa

rt m en t o f Cri m i n al J us t i ce–C o rr ect i o n al

In s t i t ut i o n s Di v i s i o n an d Pardo n s an d Paro l es Di v i s i o n

.

Del i v ered: Sept em

b er 29, 2021

Do n o t pub l i s h
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statement of operations
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such consolidated financial
statements together with the related footnotes thereto.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          31,768
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,216
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     56,079
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               122,084
<PP&E>                                         178,362
<DEPRECIATION>                                  82,070
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 617,132
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           65,695
<BONDS>                                        565,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (22,125)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   617,132
<SALES>                                        261,377
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               261,377
<CGS>                                          147,372
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  147,372
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                39,440
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              53,613
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,468
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,879
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,589
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,589
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
November 17, 2015



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

THOMAS R. WRIGHT , Appellant

NO. 14

- 15

- 00320

- CV V.

PLAINSCAPITAL BANK , Appellee

________________________________ Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the order signed by the court below on April 6, 2015. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellant, Thomas R. Wright.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
UNI T ED STAT ES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 8

Ref: 8P-AR Brian Gustafson, Administrator 1595 Wynkoop Street DENVER, CO 80202-1129 Phone 800-227-8917 http://www.epa.gov/region08 

## FEB 0 4 2013 Air Quality Program, Department ofEnvironment and Natural Resources PMB 2020, Joe Foss Building 523 East Capitol Pierre, South Dakota 57501-3182 Dear Brian: R e: Completeness Determination for 2008 Lead (Pb) Infrastructure SIP Submission On October 16 , 20 12, the E PA received your Inf r astructure State Imp l ementation Plan (iS T P) submission for the 2008 Lead (Pb) NAAQS . We have determined that the submittal ofthe South Dakota iS lP is administratively and technically complete for the requirements of section 1 1 O(a)(2)(A), (B), and (C) to the extent it refers to enforcement, to permitting programs for minor so urc es, and to permitting program s requi r ed by CAA pa rt C title I , (D), (E)-(H), and (1)- (M). We are now reviewing your submission to prepare a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPR) which will evaluate whether the state's submission can be approved . 

### Ifmembers of your staff have any questi ons, they may d i rect them to Kathy Ayala at 303-312 - 6142 or ayala.kathy@epa.gov . 

# c::J ;{J. Carl Daly 

# "-"'" 0 Air Program Dir ector

Printed on Recycled Paper
§ 331.20 Administrative review. ( a ) An individual or entity may appeal a denial, revocation, or suspension of registration under this part. The appeal must be in writing, state the factual basis for the appeal, and be submitted to the Administrator within 30 calendar days of the decision.
( b ) An individual may appeal a denial, limitation, or revocation of access approval under this part. The appeal must be in writing, state the factual basis for the appeal, and be submitted to the Administrator within 180 calendar days of the decision.
( c ) The Administrator's decision constitutes final agency action.
[77 FR 61077, Oct. 5, 2012]
2006-0235.

#### Olynyk v. Andrish.

Cuyahoga App. No. 86009, 2005-Ohio-6632. Reported at 109 Ohio St3.d 1420, 2006-Ohio-1967, 846 N.E.2d 531. On motion for reconsideration. Motion for reconsideration granted to the following extent:

The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed January 9, 2006:

“Whether the double dismissal rule contained in Rule 41(A) of the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure applies to plaintiffs voluntary dismissal of claims pursuant to Rule 41(A)(2) of the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure.”

Pfeifer, J., dissents.

The conflict case is *Van Beusecum v. Continental Builders,*Delaware App. No. 04-CAE-01-008, 2004-Ohio-7261.

*1510Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2006-0310, *Olynyk v. Andrish,*Cuyahoga App. No. 86009, 2005-Ohio-6632.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         561,400
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       6,634,100
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,388,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,390,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           97,400
<BONDS>                                      1,775,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,518,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,390,800
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,359,500
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,148,300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             172,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    38,800
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20


</TABLE>
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2409 

To amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to permit a State 

to require an applicant for voter registration in the State who uses 

the Federal mail voter registration application form developed by the 

Election Assistance Commission under such Act to provide documentary 

evidence of citizenship as a condition of the State’s acceptance of the 

form. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 18, 2013 

Mr. SALMON (for himself, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. SCHWEIKERT, and Mr. 

GOSAR) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to 

permit a State to require an applicant for voter registration in the State who uses the Federal mail voter registration application form developed by the Election Assistance Commission under such Act to provide documentary evidence of citizenship as a condition of the State’s 

acceptance of the form. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 2409 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State Sovereignty in 

3 Voting Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PERMITTING STATES TO REQUIRE VOTER REG5 ISTRATION APPLICANTS USING FEDERAL 

6 MAIL FORM TO SUBMIT DOCUMENTARY EVI7 DENCE OF CITIZENSHIP AS CONDITION OF 

8 ACCEPTANCE OF APPLICATION. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 6(a)(1) of the National 

10 Voter Registration Act of 1993 (42 U.S.C. 1973gg– 

11 4(a)(1)) is amended by striking the period at the end and 

12 inserting the following: ‘‘, except that a State may require 

13 an applicant who submits such form to provide documen14 tary evidence of the applicant’s citizenship as a condition 

15 of the State’s acceptance of the form.’’. 

16 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

17 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to elections for 

18 Federal office held after the date of the enactment of this 

19 Act. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2611 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2611

To designate the headquarters building of the Coast Guard on the campus 
   located at 2701 Martin Luther King, Jr., Avenue Southeast in the 
District of Columbia as the ``Douglas A. Munro Coast Guard Headquarters 
                  Building'', and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 8, 2013

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the headquarters building of the Coast Guard on the campus 
   located at 2701 Martin Luther King, Jr., Avenue Southeast in the 
District of Columbia as the ``Douglas A. Munro Coast Guard Headquarters 
                  Building'', and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The headquarters building of the Coast Guard on the campus located 
at 2701 Martin Luther King, Jr., Avenue Southeast in the District of 
Columbia shall be known and designated as the ``Douglas A. Munro Coast 
Guard Headquarters Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Douglas A. Munro Coast Guard 
Headquarters Building''.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2020399EN.01003901.xml

| 30.11.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 399/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 399/39

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1769 of 25 November 2020 on the reimbursement, in accordance with Article 26(5) of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council, of the appropriations carried over from financial year 2020

(
  OJ L 398 of 27.11.2020
  )

The following Annex is added to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1769:

‘ANNEX

Amounts available for reimbursement of appropriations carried over

| (amounts in EUR) |
| --- |
| Belgium | 6 081 361 |
| Bulgaria | 9 865 664 |
| Czechia | 11 629 880 |
| Denmark | 10 729 338 |
| Germany | 60 566 679 |
| Estonia | 1 776 883 |
| Ireland | 13 853 297 |
| Greece | 16 876 498 |
| Spain | 59 526 083 |
| France | 89 125 550 |
| Italy | 37 625 545 |
| Cyprus | 360 506 |
| Latvia | 3 067 758 |
| Lithuania | 4 823 124 |
| Luxembourg | 425 264 |
| Hungary | 15 920 199 |
| Malta | 38 180 |
| Netherlands | 8 322 935 |
| Austria | 7 306 532 |
| Poland | 27 648 219 |
| Portugal | 7 256 992 |
| Romania | 19 079 200 |
| Slovenia | 946 235 |
| Slovakia | 6 114 353 |
| Finland | 6 241 899 |
| Sweden | 8 412 713 |

(amounts in EUR)

Belgium

6 081 361

Bulgaria

9 865 664

Czechia

11 629 880

Denmark

10 729 338

Germany

60 566 679

Estonia

1 776 883

Ireland

13 853 297

Greece

16 876 498

Spain

59 526 083

France

89 125 550

Italy

37 625 545

Cyprus

360 506

Latvia

3 067 758

Lithuania

4 823 124

Luxembourg

425 264

Hungary

15 920 199

Malta

38 180

Netherlands

8 322 935

Austria

7 306 532

Poland

27 648 219

Portugal

7 256 992

Romania

19 079 200

Slovenia

946 235

Slovakia

6 114 353

Finland

6 241 899

Sweden

8 412 713

---
§ 3201.114 Intermediates—Lubricant Components. ( a ) *Definition.* Intermediates—Lubricant Components are ingredients that used specifically to formulate finished lubricant products. Examples of Intermediates—Lubricant Components include base oils, base fluids, additives, or friction modifiers.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The Federal preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 44 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than July 10, 2019, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased Intermediates—Lubricant Components. By that date, Federal agencies responsible for drafting or reviewing specifications for products to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased Intermediates—Lubricant Components.
[83 FR 31848, July 10, 2018]