alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Archives and Records Administration

# AGENCY:

National Archives and Records Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2), and the Presidential Historical Records Preservation Act of 2008 (Pub. L. 110-404), the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) announces the inaugural meeting of the Founding Fathers Advisory Committee. The Committee will advise the Archivist of the United States on the progress of the Founding Fathers editorial projects funded by the National Historical Publications and Records Commission (NHPRC), the grant making arm of the National Archives. The meeting will discuss the goals and purposes of the committee, how it will proceed with its work, and anticipated future accomplishments.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on Monday, December 13, 2010 from 2 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

National Archives and Records Administration, 700 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Archivist's Board Room, Room 119, Washington, DC 20408.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    This meeting will be open to the public. However, due to space limitations and access procedures, the name, email address, and telephone number of individuals planning to attend must be submitted to the National Archives no later than Tuesday, December 7. NARA staff will provide additional instructions for gaining access to the location of the meeting. Please RSVP to:                     *christine.dunham@nara.gov*                     or (202) 357-5094.                

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Kathleen Williams, Executive Director of the NHPRC, National Archives Building, 700 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Room 106, Washington, DC 20408,                         *telephone number:*                         (202) 357-5010, or at                         *kathleen.williams@nara.gov.*

Dated: November 17, 2010.

Mary Ann Hadyka,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2010-29661 Filed 11-23-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7515-01-P
#### In the Matter of Harry L. Brown, an Attorney, Respondent. Office of Grievance Committee, Petitioner.

Fourth Department,

July 10, 1980

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*David E. Brennan*for petitioner.

*Arthur F. Dobson, Jr.,*for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

*Per Curiam.*

Respondent was admitted to the Bar on March 9, 1949. On October 23, 1979 he was convicted in the District Court of the *399United States for the Western District of New York of two charges of willful and knowing attempt to evade a large part of the income tax due and owing by him and his wife to the United States in violation of section 7201 of title 26 of the United States Code for the years 1972 and 1973. He was sentenced to two years imprisonment on each count to be served concurrently and was fined the sum of $5,000 on each count. The sentences of imprisonment were suspended and respondent was placed on probation for one year on condition that he first pay the $10,000 fine.

Pursuant to section 90 (subd 4, par f) of the Judiciary Law on November 29, 1979 (73 AD2d 790) we ordered respondent’s suspension until our further order. On respondent’s motion dated December 4, 1979 for a stay of the suspension order, we denied the motion and adjourned the matter for further proceedings to determine what punishment should be accorded to him, pursuant to section 90 (subd 4, par g) of the Judiciary Law. The matter was referred to a Referee to take testimony in mitigation of punishment and the Referee has submitted his report.

In light of the serious nature of the crimes of which respondent was convicted, constituting violations of canon 1 of the New York Code of Professional Responsibility, EC 1-5 and DR 1-102 (A), and subdivision 2 of section 90 of the Judiciary Law, we conclude that respondent should be suspended for a period of one year commencing November 29, 1979 and until the further order of this court.

Cardamons, J. P., Simons, Hancock, Jr., Schnepp and Witmer, JJ., concur.

Final order of suspension entered pursuant to section 90 (subd 4, par g) of the Judiciary Law.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, March 13, 2017.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, March 13, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17D0291. BRANDON SHANDREA BATTS v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2012F12395
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ALBERT WINSTON WRIGHT,

Inmate No. 12986,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 3:19cv3540/MCR/EMT

WALTON COUNTY SHERIFFS

OFFICE, et al.,

Defendants.

__________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge’s 

Report and Recommendation dated December 9, 2019. ECF No. 8. Plaintiff has 

been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and afforded an 

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 

636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed 

objections thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be 

adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted 

and incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to 

comply with an order of the court and failure to keep the court apprised 

of his current address.

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of January 2020.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
118 STAT. 1750 PUBLIC LAW 108–370—OCT. 25, 2004

Public Law 108–370

108th Congress

An Act

To amend the International Child Abduction Remedies Act to limit the tort liability

of private entities or organizations that carry out responsibilities of the United

States Central Authority under that Act.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Prevention of Child Abduction

Partnership Act’’.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON LIABILITY.

Section 7 of the International Child Abduction Remedies Act

(42 U.S.C. 11606) is amended by adding at the end the following

new subsection:

‘‘(f) LIMITED LIABILITY OF PRIVATE ENTITIES ACTING UNDER

THE DIRECTION OF THE UNITED STATES CENTRAL AUTHORITY.—

‘‘(1) LIMITATION ON LIABILITY.—Except as provided in paragraphs (2) and (3), a private entity or organization that receives

a grant from or enters into a contract or agreement with

the United States Central Authority under subsection (e) of

this section for purposes of assisting the United States Central

Authority in carrying out its responsibilities and functions

under the Convention and this Act, including any director,

officer, employee, or agent of such entity or organization, shall

not be liable in any civil action sounding in tort for damages

directly related to the performance of such responsibilities and

functions as defined by the regulations issued under subsection

(c) of this section that are in effect on October 1, 2004.

‘‘(2) EXCEPTION FOR INTENTIONAL, RECKLESS, OR OTHER MISCONDUCT.—The limitation on liability under paragraph (1) shall

not apply in any action in which the plaintiff proves that

the private entity, organization, officer, employee, or agent

described in paragraph (1), as the case may be, engaged in

intentional misconduct or acted, or failed to act, with actual

malice, with reckless disregard to a substantial risk of causing

injury without legal justification, or for a purpose unrelated

to the performance of responsibilities or functions under this

Act.

‘‘(3) EXCEPTION FOR ORDINARY BUSINESS ACTIVITIES.—The

limitation on liability under paragraph (1) shall not apply to

any alleged act or omission related to an ordinary business

activity, such as an activity involving general administration

42 USC 11601

note.

Prevention of

Child Abduction

Partnership Act.

Oct. 25, 2004

[S. 2883]

PUBLIC LAW 108–370—OCT. 25, 2004 118 STAT. 1751

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 2883:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):

Oct. 1, considered and passed Senate.

Oct. 8, considered and passed House.

Æ

or operations, the use of motor vehicles, or personnel management.’’.

Approved October 25, 2004.
```

[108th Congress Public Law 353]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ353.108]

[[Page 118 STAT. 1399]]

Public Law 108-353
108th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
4141 Postmark Drive, Anchorage, Alaska, as the ``Robert J. Opinsky Post 
        Office Building''. <<NOTE: Oct. 21, 2004 -  [S. 2415]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. ROBERT J. OPINSKY POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 4141 Postmark Drive, in Anchorage, Alaska, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Robert J. Opinsky Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Robert J. 
Opinsky Post Office Building''.

    Approved October 21, 2004.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 2415:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):
            June 9, considered and passed Senate.
            Oct. 6, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                                           
<ARTICLE>     5                                                  
     <LEGEND>      THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
                   INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE REGISTRANT'S
                   FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR ITS FISCAL YEAR ENDED
                   JUNE 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
                   REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

<S>                              <C>                                   
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     Jun-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                          Jun-30-1996
<CASH>                                                     13,741
<SECURITIES>                                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              11,627
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                                 2,995
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           31,574
<PP&E>                                                    137,372
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            178,162
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      37,785
<BONDS>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                       64
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           0
<PREFERRED>                                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                                                (37,637)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              178,162
<SALES>                                                    96,547
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           96,547
<CGS>                                                      71,753
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              71,753
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           24,324
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         18,646
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           (18,176)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                 (463)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       (17,713)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 0
<CHANGES>                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                              (17,713)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                               (4.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               (4.24)
                                       

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 3401
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3401 appear at 76 FR 4806, Jan. 27, 2011.

§ 3401.7 Evaluation and disposition of applications. ( a ) *Evaluation.* All proposals received from eligible applicants in accordance with eligible research problem or program areas and deadlines established in the applicable request for proposals shall be evaluated by the Director through such officers, employees, and others as the Director determines are particularly qualified in the areas of research represented by particular projects. To assist in equitably and objectively evaluating proposals and to obtain the best possible balance of viewpoints, the Director may solicit the advice of peer scientists, *ad hoc* reviewers, or others who are recognized specialists in the research program areas covered by the applications received. Specific evaluations will be based upon the criteria established in subpart B of this part, § 3401.17, unless NIFA determines that different criteria are necessary for the proper evaluation of proposals in one or more specific program areas, and announces such criteria and their relative importance in the annual program solicitation. The overriding purpose of such evaluations is to provide information upon which the Director can make informed judgments in selecting proposals for ultimate support. Incomplete, unclear, or poorly organized applications will work to the detriment of applicants during the peer evaluation process. To ensure a comprehensive evaluation, all applications should be written with the care and thoroughness accorded papers for publication.
( b ) *Disposition.* On the basis of the Director's evaluation of an application in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section, the Director will approve using currently available funds, defer support due to lack of funds or a need for further evaluations, or disapprove support for the proposed project in whole or in part. With respect to approved projects, the Director will determine the project period (subject to extension as provided in § 3401.9(c)) during which the project may be supported. Any deferral or disapproval of an application will not preclude its reconsideration or a reapplication during subsequent fiscal years.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cascade Technologies Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Randall Gates, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: November 8, 2010  /s/ Randall GatesName:Randall GatesTitle:Chief Financial Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cascade Technologies Corp.  and will be retained by Cascade Technologies Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.   *This certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
# Inventory Expert Service A division of the American Chemical Society December 21, 2010 Phone: 800-631-1884 , 614-447-3870 Fax: 614-447-3747 E-mail: answers@cas.org Web: www.cas.org/products/client/

Thank you for your Inventory Expert Service (IES) order of December 20, 2010 . The processing results for your order are include d on the following page. To ensure eff i cient processing of your substance, it is important that you i nclude this page with your PMN report form when reporting your substance to the EPll. . 

### An invoice will be issued to cover the cost of the processing of ycur order . Thank you for the opportunity to provide this service. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contac t me at 614 - 447 - 3870 .

# Si~ Jennifer Moore Inventory Expert Service Enclosure(s) : Inventory Expert Servi ce Report

CAS 2540 Olentangy River Road P.O . Box 3343 Co lumbus. Ohio 43210-0334 USA

# Inventory Expert Service A di visio n of th e Americ an Ch e mic al Society Phone: 800-631 - 1884, 614-447- 3870 Fax:614-447-3747 E-mai l: answers@cas .org Web: www.cas . org/products/di e ntl

CAS 

### INVENTORY E XPE RT SE RVI C E R E

PORT IES-ORDER NUMB E R: REGISTRY NUMBER: CA INDEX NAME

Please print the above CA Index Name on the appropriate page of your PMN. 

# 0 If this box is checked, CAS has made correction(s) marked in red to your IES order. Please make the same correction(s) to your PMN before submitting it to the EPA.

2S40 Olentangy Ri ver Road P.O . Box 3343 Columbus. Ohio 432 10-0334 USA
98-1531.

#### State v. Gress.

Montgomery App. No. 16899. On motion for stay. Motion denied.
|   | 1. |   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                         |
|--------|----|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 2. |   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

|                         | India      Globalization Capital, Inc. |                                                                                                                                                                      |
|------------------------------|----------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                         |                                   |                                                                                                                                                                      |   |
| Date:      February 10, 2009 | By:                                    | /s/ Ram      Mukunda                         |   |
|                         |                                   | Ram      Mukunda                                                                                                                                                          |   |
|                         |                                   | Chief      Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer)                                                                                             |   |
###### Editorial Note on Part 3401

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3401 appear at 76 FR 4806, Jan. 27, 2011.

#### § 3401.14 Conflicts of interest.

Members of peer review groups covered by this part are subject to relevant provisions contained in Title 18 of the United States Code relating to criminal activity, Department regulations governing employee responsibilities and conduct (part 0 of this title), and Executive Order 11222 (3 CFR, 1964-1965 Comp., p. 306), as amended. Administration of the peer review group must be in accordance with the Department's conflict of interest policy, 2 CFR 400.2.

[61 FR 27753, May 31, 1996, as amended at 79 FR 75998, Dec. 19, 2014]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:99cr30-02/RV

ELIJAH WILLIE DIAL

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Senior Judge Roger Vinson on March 1, 2007

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION for clarification 

Filed by Defendant on 01/24/2007 Doc.# 302

RESPONSES:

 None on Doc.# 

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

 Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

 s/Jerry Marbut

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Jerry Marbut

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 1st day of

 March , 2007, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) See the Government’s previously-filed response (doc. 290).

 /s/ Roger Vinson

ROGER VINSON

Senior United States District Judge

Case 3:99-cr-00030-MCR-CJK Document 305 Filed 03/01/07 Page 1 of 1