alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2258 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2258

  To amend the Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933 to increase the 
membership of the Board of Directors and require that each State in the 
  service area of the Tennessee Valley Authority be represented by at 
                            least 1 member.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 8, 2006

 Mr. Isakson (for himself and Mr. Chambliss) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933 to increase the 
membership of the Board of Directors and require that each State in the 
  service area of the Tennessee Valley Authority be represented by at 
                            least 1 member.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MEMBERSHIP OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS.

    Section 2(a)(1) of the Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933 (16 
U.S.C. 831(a)(1)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``9'' and inserting ``13''; and
            (2) by striking ``at least'' and all that follows and 
        inserting ``, of whom at least 1 member shall be a legal 
        resident of each State in the service area of the 
        Corporation.''.
                                 <all>
```
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.31    
    


[Company
Letterhead] 


March 11,
2005 


Mark
Sopp

Sr. Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

The Titan Corporation 



	Re:
	Employment Agreement Extension




Dear
Mark, 


        This
will confirm that the Board of Directors has approved an extension of the term of that certain Employment Agreement between you and the Company dated April 2, 2003 (the
"Employment Agreement"). 


        Accordingly,
the Term of the Employment Agreement, as such term is defined in the Employment Agreement, is hereby extended for an additional two year period, until April 2, 2007,
unless terminated earlier in accordance with the Employment Agreement. 


        All
other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain unaffected by this extension and shall remain in full force and effect. 



Very
truly yours, 


/s/
Gene W. Ray 


Gene
W. Ray

Chairman, CEO and President

The Titan Corporation 











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.31
§ 319.55-1 Definitions. ( a ) *Seed or paddy rice.* Unhusked rice in the form commonly used for seed purposes; the regulations in this subpart do not apply to husked or polished rice imported for food purposes.
( b ) *Port of first arrival.* The first port within the United States where the shipment is ( 1 ) offered for consumption entry or
( 2 ) offered for entry for immediate transportation in bond.
( c ) *Inspector.* An Inspector of the Plant Protection and Quarantine Programs of the United States Department of Agriculture.
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________
No. 02

- 23

- 00301

- CR

___________________________

On Appeal from the 30th District Court Wichita County, Texas Trial Court No. DC30

- CR2023

- 0153

Before Wallach , J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Walker, J

. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### T IMOTHY 

### M ICHAEL 

### T EMELCOFF 

### , Appellant

V



### .
T HE 

### S TATE OF 

### T EXAS2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGM ENT
Appellant has moved to dismiss his appeal. Because we have not yet decided
this case, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a),
43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Do Not Publish Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2(b)

Delivered: November 22, 2023
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Flyersrights.org,  Department of Transportation Advisory Committee for Aviation Consumer Protection  This document has attachments
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 71134)    
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of General Medical Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; Conference Grants Review.                     

*Date:*                         December 13, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 6 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, 45 Center Drive, Room 3AN-12F, Bethesda, MD 20814.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Helen R. Sunshine, PhD, Chief, Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, Room 3AN-12F, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-2881,                         *sunshinh@nigms.nih.gov.*

Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 16, 2010.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-29359 Filed 11-19-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Dominic Cataldo, Appellant, v. Harold M. Follette, as Warden of Green Haven Prison, Respondent.

-In a habeas corpus proceeding, relator appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated June 21, 1966, dismissing the writ. Appeal dismissed, without costs. Relator received his unconditional release from State prison on January 8, 1967, rendering the present appeal moot. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ERIC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. ALFRE DO GOM EZ-M AR TINEZ, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 15-10288

D.C . No. 4:14-c r-00868-R C C M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ariz o na R ane r C . C ollins, C hie f Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d July 26, 2016 ** B e fore : SC HR O EDER , C ANB Y, a n d C ALLAHAN, C irc uit Judge s. Alfre do Gom e z -M a

rtine za ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt a nd c ha lle nge s his guilty -ple a c onvic tion a

nd 57-m onth se nte nc e for re e ntry of a re m ove d a l ie n, in viola

t ion of 8 U.S.C . § 1326. Pursua nt to Ande rs v . C

alifornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Gom e z -M artine z ’ s c ounse l ha s file d a brie f stating tha

t the re 

# FIL ED AUG 03 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).are n o grounds for re lie f, a long with a m otion to withdra

w a s c ounse l of re c ord. Gom e z -M artine z ha s file d a pro se supple m e nta l brie f. No a nswe ring brie f ha s be e n file d . Our indepe nde nt re v i e w of the re c ord pursua nt to Pe nson v . Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), disc lose s no a rgua ble grounds for re lie f on dire c t a ppe a l. C ounse l’ s m otion to withdra w is G RANT E D. All othe r pe nding m otions are d e nie d . AFFIRM E D.

1 5 - 1 0 2 8 8 2
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:99CR22LAC

DERRICK STEWART

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on February 17, 2009 

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT MOTION FOR REDUCTION OF 

SENTENCE PURSUANT TO TITLE 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) 

Filed by DEFENDANT PRO SE on 2/13/2009 Doc.# 107

RESPONSES:

BY GOVERNMENT on2/17/09 Doc.# 108

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Mary Maloy

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 17

th day of

February, 2009, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) See Government’s well reasoned response. 

 s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 3:99-cr-00022-LC-MD Document 109 Filed 02/17/09 Page 1 of 1
§ 3201.73 Slide way lubricants. ( a ) *Definition.* Products used to provide lubrication and eliminate stick-slip and table chatter by reducing friction between mating surfaces, or slides, found in machine tools.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The Federal preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 74 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than July 23, 2012, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased slide way lubricants. By that date, Federal agencies that have the responsibility for drafting or reviewing specifications for items to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased slide way lubricants.
[76 FR 43817, July 22, 2011]
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT

OF

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY

1110 West Washington Street• Phoenix, Arizona 85007

(602) 771-2300 • www.azdeq.gov Janice K. Brewer

Governor

SUBMITTED VIA EMAIL AND FEDEX

JUL 02 2Q14

Mr. Jared Blumenfeld

Regional Administrator

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX

Mail Code: ORA-1

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

Re: Submittal of the MAG 2014 Eight-Hour Ozone Plan — Submittal of Marginal Area

Requirements for the Maricopa Nonattainment Area

Dear M~~i~&nfeld:

Consistent with provisions of Arizona Revised Statutes § § 49-104, 49-404, 49-406 and the Code

of Federal Regulations, Title 40, § § 51.102 through 51.104 and Appendix V to Part 51, the

Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) hereby adopts and submits to the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the MAG 2014 Eight-Hour Ozone Plan - Submittal of

Marginal Area Requirements for the Maricopa Nonattainment Area as a revision to the Arizona

State Implementation Plan (SIP). Pursuant to A.R.S. § 49-406, the plan was developed by the

Maricopa Association of Governments (MAG).

The Maricopa area was designated as a marginal nonattainment area for the 2008 eight-hour

ozone standard on May 21, 2012. This plan addresses the Marginal Area requirements, such as

an Emissions Statement, Baseline Emissions Inventory, Periodic Emission Inventory,

Corrections to Pre-1990 Reasonable Available Control Technology, New Source Review,

Correction to Pre-1990 Previously Required Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Programs, and

Transportation Conformity.

The SIP revision consists of copies of the authorizing statutes cited above (Enclosure 1).

Enclosure 2 contains the SIP Completeness Checklist demonstrating that this submission

satisfies the requirements of 40 C.F.R. Part 51 Appendix V. Enclosure 3 contains one paper

Southern Regional Office

400 West Congress Street • Suite 433 • Tucson, AZ 85701

(520) 628—6733

Henry R. Darwin

Director

Printed on recycled paper
Page 2 of 2

copy and an electronic copy of the MAG 2014 Eight-Hour Ozone Plan-Submittal of Marginal

Area Requirements for the Maricopa Nonattainment Area SIP revision. If you have any

questions, please contact me at (602) 771-2288.

Sincerely,

Division

cc. Colleen McKaughan, EPA Region IX

Dennis Smith, w/o enclosures, MAG

Dennis Dickerson, w/o enclosures, Maricopa County Air Quality Department

Air

Director
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. 4:89cr4037-WS

LEONARD DARBY, 4:06cv9-WS

Defendant.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 353)

docketed April 17, 2006. The magistrate judge recommends that the defendant's

section 2255 motion (doc. 351), as clarified by a document addressing the timeliness of

the motion (doc. 352), be denied. The defendant has filed objections (doc. 358) to the

report and recommendation as well as a letter (doc. 356) that has been construed as

additional objections to the report and recommendation.

Upon review of the record in light of the defendant’s objections, the court has

determined that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation must be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 353) is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order of the court.

Case 4:89-cr-04037-WS Document 359 Filed 06/19/06 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 4:89cr4037-WS

2. The defendant’s section 2255 motion (doc. 351) is DENIED. 

3. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and shall close Case No. 

4:06cv9-WS.

DONE AND ORDERED this June 19, 2006.

 /s William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:89-cr-04037-WS Document 359 Filed 06/19/06 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Dolce Ventures Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the  Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  John  F.
Passalaqua,  Secretary/Treasurer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ John F. Passalaqua
John F. Passalaqua
Secretary/Treasurer, Dolce Ventures Inc.

June 24, 2005





                                  END OF FILING
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAdvanced materials for space nuclear power systemsThe overall philosophy of the research was to develop and characterize new high temperature power conversion and radiator materials and to provide spacecraft designers with material selection options and design information. Research on three candidate materials (carbide strengthened niobium alloy PWC-11 for fuel cladding, graphite fiber reinforced copper matrix composites for heat rejection fins, and tungsten fiber reinforced niobium matrix composites for fuel containment and structural supports considered for space power system applications is discussed. Each of these types of materials offers unique advantages for space power applications.Document ID19910019984Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsTitran, Robert H.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH., United States)*Grobstein, Toni L.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH., United States)*Ellis, David L.*(Case Western Reserve Univ. Cleveland, OH., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1991Subject CategoryMetallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:105171NASA-TM-105171DOE/NASA/16310-16AIAA PAPER 91-3530E-6464Meeting InformationMeeting: Conference on Advanced Space Exploration Initiative TechnologiesLocation: Cleveland, OHCountry: United StatesStart Date: September 4, 1991End Date: September 6, 1991Sponsors:AIAA,NASA,OAIAccession Number91N29298Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: DE-AI03-86SF-16310Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910019984.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. 4:96cr20-WS

KENNETH LAMAR ELLINGTON,

Defendant.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 57)

docketed January 4, 2006. The magistrate judge recommends that the defendant's

section 2255 motion be summarily dismissed as untimely. The defendant has filed

objections (doc. 59) to the report and recommendation.

Upon review of the record in light of the defendant’s objections, the court has

determined that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation must be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 57) is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order of the court.

2. The defendant’s section 2255 motion (doc. 55) is hereby summarily

DISMISSED as untimely.

Case 4:96-cr-00020-WS-CAS Document 60 Filed 01/30/06 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 4:96cr20-WS

3. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and shall close Case No.

4:05cv454-WS.

DONE AND ORDERED this January 30, 2006.

 /s William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:96-cr-00020-WS-CAS Document 60 Filed 01/30/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION
  In connection with the Quarterly Report of PDC 2005-A Limited Partnership (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certify pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 
 /s/ Richard W. McCullough

May 14, 2010Richard W. McCulloughChief Executive OfficerPetroleum Development CorporationManaging General Partner/s/ Gysle R. Shellum

May 14, 2010Gysle R. ShellumChief Financial OfficerPetroleum Development CorporationManaging General Partner
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided by the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
149 So.2d 769

#### STATE of Louisiana v. J. Bernard COCKE.

No. 46611.

Feb. 20, 1963.

Writs denied. The application does not disclose an abuse of discretion on the part of the trial judge.
Dear Mr. Salinas:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket 

No. FAA−2015−3679). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration

(FAA) to process your petition.

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) 

which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to 

proceed without this manual and remove closed-set filming from your proposed operation 

please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at 

www.regulations.gov. Once your information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the 

requested information (and any proprietary information), as well as your comment tracking 

number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process 

your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 11/12/15. If we do 

not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267–4549.

Sincerely,

/S/

Michael J. Cameron

Program Analyst
#### § 3.52 Definitions.

As used in this subpart the following definitions will apply:

*Disposable pay* means that part of the debtor's compensation (including, but not limited to, salary, bonuses, commissions, and vacation pay) from an employer remaining after the deduction of health insurance premiums and any amounts required by law to be withheld. For purposes of this section, “amounts required by law to be withheld” include amounts for deductions such as social security taxes and withholding taxes, but do not include any amount withheld pursuant to a court order.

*Employer* means a person or entity that employs the services of others and that pays their wages or salaries. The term employer includes, but is not limited to, State and local governments, but does not include an agency of the Federal government.

*Garnishment* means the process of withholding amounts from an employee's disposable pay and the paying of those amounts to a creditor in satisfaction of a withholding order.

*Withholding order* means any order for withholding or garnishment of pay issued by an agency, or judicial or administrative body. For purposes of this section, the terms “wage garnishment order” and “garnishment order” have the same meaning as “withholding order.”