alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2585 

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 

enhance the use of Juvenile Accountability Block Grants for programs 

to prevent and address occurrences of bullying and to reauthorize the 

Juvenile Accountability Block Grants program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 28, 2013 

Ms. JACKSON LEE (for herself, Mr. HONDA, Mr. HOLT, and Mr. HINOJOSA) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets 

Act of 1968 to enhance the use of Juvenile Accountability Block Grants for programs to prevent and address 

occurrences of bullying and to reauthorize the Juvenile 

Accountability Block Grants program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Juvenile Accountability 

5 Block Grant Reauthorization and the Bullying Prevention 

6 and Intervention Act of 2013’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2585 IH

1 SEC. 2. BULLYING PREVENTION AND INTERVENTION PRO2 GRAMS; REAUTHORIZATION OF JUVENILE AC3 COUNTABILITY BLOCK GRANTS. 

4 (a) BULLYING PREVENTION AND INTERVENTION.— 

5 (1) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (13) of section 

6 1801(b) of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 

7 Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796ee(b)) is 

8 amended to read as follows: 

9 ‘‘(13) establishing and maintaining account10 ability-based programs that are designed to enhance 

11 school safety, which programs may include research12 based bullying prevention, cyberbullying prevention, 

13 and gang prevention programs, as well as interven14 tion programs regarding bullying;’’. 

15 (2) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of 

16 the Congress that the use of best practices is en17 couraged for all activities for which grants under 

18 part R of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and 

19 Safe Streets Act of 1968 may be used. 

20 (b) REAUTHORIZATION OF JUVENILE ACCOUNT21 ABILITY BLOCK GRANTS.—Section 1810(a) of such Act 

22 (42 U.S.C. 3796ee–10(a)) is amended by inserting before 

23 the period at the end the following: ‘‘and such funds as 

24 may be necessary for each of fiscal years 2014 through 

25 2018’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: 7/31/2015

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: Mike Gordon, EPA Region 3

SUBJECT: 6/25/15 Southeastern Electric Exchange Conference

SUMMARY

On June 25, 2015 EPA presented at the annual Southeastern Electrical Exchange 

conference in Hershey, PA to discuss the proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants.

The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES

Mike Gordon, EPA Region 3

Donna Mastro, EPA Region 3
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 71450]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29524]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel Institutional National Research Service 
Awards.
    Date: December 15, 2010.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20817. (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Roy L White, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood 
Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7176, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924. 
301-435-0310. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#55223d3c21302739153b3d39373c7b3b3c3d7b323a23"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cbbca3a2bfaeb9a78ba5a3a7a9a2e5a5a2a3e5aca4bd">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute 
Special Emphasis Panel Conference Grants.
    Date: December 16-17, 2010.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892. (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: William J Johnson, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Office of Scientific Review/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and 
Blood Institute, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 7178, Bethesda, MD 
20892-7924. 301-435-0725. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a8c2c7c0c6dbc7c6dfc2e8c6c0c4cac186c6c1c086cfc7de"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="96fcf9fef8e5f9f8e1fcd6f8fefaf4ffb8f8fffeb8f1f9e0">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)


    Dated: November 17, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-29524 Filed 11-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1 

### Werner, Christopher

From: Szabo, Aaron <Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov> Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 9:39 AM To: Werner, Christopher Cc: Lorang, Phil; Jones, Rhea; Beaver, Melinda; Marks, Matthew; Anderson, Lea; VanLare, Paula; Greenglass, Nora; Smith, Kristi; Wood, Anna Subject: Summary of Additional Interagency Comments under EO 12866 and 13563: EPA NPRM -- Protection of Visibility: Amendments to Requirem ents for State Plans (RIN 2060- AS55) Attachments: Summary of Interagency Comments under EO12866_E0135 63_Regional Haze_ 2060....docx
Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed
Categories: Regional Haze



### Attached please find the summary of additional inte ragency comments under EO 12866 and 13563 for the d raft proposed rule entitled, Protection of Visibility: Amendments to Requirement s for State Plans (RIN 2060-AS55). These comments are in response to the most recent informa tion provided by EPA for interagency review.

Aaron L. Szabo Policy Analyst Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs Office of Management and Budget 202-395-3621 Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov
#### § 29.3541 Resweated.

The condition of tobacco which has passed through a second fermentation under abnormally high temperatures or refermented with a relatively high percentage of moisture. Resweated includes tobacco which has been dipped or reconditioned after its first fermentation and put through a forced or artificial sweat.

[30 FR 9207, July 23, 1965. Redesignated at 49 FR 16759, Apr. 20, 1984]
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Southern Trust Securities Holding Corp., Inc. (the “Corporation”) certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and the information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.




Date: August  20, 2012
By:
/s/ Robert EscobioName: Robert EscobioTitle: Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
 This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document, and may not be disclosed, distributed or used by any person for any reason other than as specifically required by law.
#### § 29.2529 Leaf scrap.

A byproduct of unstemmed tobacco. Leaf scrap results from handling unstemmed tobacco and consists of loose and tangled whole or broken leaves.

[37 FR 13626, July 12, 1972. Redesignated at 49 FR 16757, Apr. 20, 1984]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

vs. CASE NO. 4:02cr11-SPM/AK

JOSEPH WAYNE OLIVER, 

Defendant.

____________________________/

ORDER

THIS CAUSE comes for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s report

and recommendation dated June 27, 2006 (doc. 72). Defendant has been

furnished a copy and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant

to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been

filed. Having considered the report and recommendation, I have determined that

the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation is ADOPTED

and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Defendant’s motion to vacate (doc. 59) is denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 19th day of September, 2006.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 4:02-cr-00011-SPM-AK Document 74 Filed 09/19/06 Page 1 of 1
§ 355.23 Recordkeeping, access, and reports. ( a ) Any person engaged in business as an importer, exporter, or reexporter of terrestrial plants listed in 50 CFR part 17 or part 23 shall keep such records as will fully and correctly disclose each importation, exportation, or reexportation of terrestrial plants made by such person and the subsequent disposition made by such person of the plants. Such records shall include shipping documents for each shipment of plants imported, exported, or reexported; a description of the form of the plants (such as whole live plants, cuttings, seeds, or other specific parts or derivatives of plants); the scientific and common names of the plants; the country or place of origin of the plants; the date and place of importation, exportation, or reexportation of the plants; the number (weight if the plants cannot be quantified by number) and specific location of plants; the date and means of subsequent disposition of the plants, whether by sale, barter, consignment, loan, delivery, destruction, or other means; and names and addresses of persons to whom the plants were disposed, if applicable.
( b ) Every record required to be kept under this section shall be kept for a period of 5 years after the occurrence of the transactions to which the records relate, and for such further time as the Deputy Administrator may require by written notice to the person required to keep such records under this part for purposes of any investigation, litigation, or other proceeding under the Act or this part.
( c ) Any person engaged in business as an importer, exporter, or reexporter of terrestrial plants listed in 50 CFR part 17 or part 23 shall, upon presentation of credentials by an inspector or duly authorized representatives of the Secretary; during ordinary business hours of the person given notice, afford such inspector access to the person's place of business, the opportunity to examine the person's inventory of plants and the records required to be kept under paragraph (a) of this section, and the opportunity to copy such records. The use of a room, table, or other facilities (other than reproduction equipment) necessary for examination and copying of records and for such examination of inventory shall be afforded such inspector.
( d ) Any person engaged in business as an importer, exporter, or reexporter of terrestrial plants listed in 50 CFR part 17 or part 23, upon written request by the Deputy Administrator, shall submit within 60 days of such request, a report concerning any of the information required to be maintained under paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section.
(Information collection requirements were approved by the Office of Budget and Management under control number 0579-0076)
#### Edith Sileo *v.*Anne M. Curran et al.

House, C. J., Thim, Ryan, Shapiro and Loiselle, Js.

Argued October 6

decided October 7, 1971

*Leo Gold,*with whom was *Isadore M. Mackler,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

*Richard A. Jontos,*for the appellees (defendants).

Per Curiam.

A jury trial arising from a motor vehicle accident resulted in a verdict for the defendants. The plaintiff, claiming errors in the charge *573to the jury, appealed from the ensuing judgment. The plaintiff and her son were the occupants of one of the two cars involved in the accident. Apparently relying on the rule set out in *Secondino*v. *New Haven Gas Co.,*147 Conn. 672, 165 A.2d 598, and specifically referring to the son of the plaintiff, the court charged the jury that the failure of a party to produce a witness who is within her power to produce, and who would naturally be produced by her, permits the inference that the evidence of that witness, if given, would be unfavorable to her cause. In fact, although the son did not appear in person at the trial as a witness, there was evidence that he was in Illinois working on a new job and could not appear. More importantly, it appears that the plaintiff had taken his deposition concerning the circumstances of the accident and the deposition, over the defendants’ objection, was introduced in evidence by the plaintiff. Under these circumstances, it was clearly error to charge the jury, as the court did, that an inference unfavorable to the plaintiff might be drawn from her failure to produce as a witness her son, whose deposition was admitted in evidence over the defendants’ objection.

There is error, the judgment is set aside and a new trial is ordered.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2611 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 42
113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2611

                          [Report No. 113-153]

To designate the headquarters building of the Coast Guard on the campus 
   located at 2701 Martin Luther King, Jr., Avenue Southeast in the 
District of Columbia as the ``Douglas A. Munro Coast Guard Headquarters 
                  Building'', and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 8, 2013

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

                             July 16, 2013

     Additional sponsors: Mr. Hunter, Mr. Garamendi, and Mr. Coble

                             July 16, 2013

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the headquarters building of the Coast Guard on the campus 
   located at 2701 Martin Luther King, Jr., Avenue Southeast in the 
District of Columbia as the ``Douglas A. Munro Coast Guard Headquarters 
                  Building'', and for other purposes.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The headquarters building of the Coast Guard on the campus located 
at 2701 Martin Luther King, Jr., Avenue Southeast in the District of 
Columbia shall be known and designated as the ``Douglas A. Munro Coast 
Guard Headquarters Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Douglas A. Munro Coast Guard 
Headquarters Building''.
                                                  House Calendar No. 42

113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2611

                          [Report No. 113-153]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To designate the headquarters building of the Coast Guard on the campus 
   located at 2701 Martin Luther King, Jr., Avenue Southeast in the 
District of Columbia as the ``Douglas A. Munro Coast Guard Headquarters 
                  Building'', and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 16, 2013

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE

COMPANY (US) INC,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 3:20cv5479

BAY COUNTY HEALTH SYSTEM LLC

doing business as

BAY MEDICAL CENTER SACRED 

HEART HEALTH SYSTEM,

Defendant.

_________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The parties have filed a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice of all claims 

and counterclaims signed by counsel for all parties in the case, ECF No. 38, stating

also that the parties request that the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce the 

settlement. Because the stipulation is conditional in nature, see Anago Franchising, 

Inc. v. Shaz, LLC, 677 F.3d 1272, 1280 (11th Cir. 2012), the Court construes it as a 

request under Rule 41(a)(2) and grants the request. Therefore, the case is 

DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, and the Court 

retains jurisdiction for a period of sixty (60) days from the date of this Order for the 

sole purpose of enforcing the settlement. In the event the settlement is not 

Case 3:20-cv-05479-MCR-EMT Document 39 Filed 10/04/21 Page 1 of 2
consummated, the Court reserves the power to reopen the case for further 

proceedings on motion filed by any party within sixty (60) days of the date of this 

Order and a showing of good cause. At this time, the Clerk is directed to close the 

file in this case for administrative purposes. At the expiration of sixty (60) days 

without activity, the Clerk is directed to close the case in its entirety for all purposes. 

DONE and ORDERED on this 4th day of October 2021.

M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:20-cv-05479-MCR-EMT Document 39 Filed 10/04/21 Page 2 of 2
Waiver	of	Pilots	license	under	the	333	exemption	ruling

The	purpose	of	this	request	under	the	FAA	333	exemption	ruling	is	to	petition	for	a waiver	for	the	required	pilots	license.	Under	the	2015	333	exemption	ruling,	By	law, any	aircraft	operation	in	the national	airspace	requires	a	certificated	and	registered aircraft,	a	licensed	pilot,	and	operational	approval.

Brian	Morris,	owner	and	chief	pilot	of	Morning	Star	Photography	(DBA	Morning	Star Creative	Group,	or	MSCG)	is	requesting	a	waiver	of	a	licensed pilot, the	second section	of	the	333	as	one	of	the	requirements	of	the	lawful	operation	of	drone aircraft	flown	by	MSCG	.		To substantiate this	request,	Brian	Morris	and	MSCG	is offering	the	following	area	of	expertise	and	knowledge	that	will	allow	Brian Morris to	safety	and	legally	operate	a	drone,	as	requested	in	the	33 3 exemption	filed	by

MSCG:

• Brian	Morris	has	flown	various	drones	for	the	past	3	years	as	both	a	hobbyist and	also	within	the	legal boundaries	of	non

- commercial	use	of	a	drone.

• Brian	Morri s	has	logged	over	1800	hours	of	flight	time	as	a	drone	pilot.

• Brian	Morris	is	fully	knowledgeable	with	the	working	of	drones	currently being	used	by	MSCG,	including	but	not	limited	to	quad	copters	and	hex

copters.

• Brian	Morris	is	fully	aware	and	knowable of	all	current	FAA	rules,	guidelines and	laws	regarding	the	legal	operation	of	drones	within	US	airspace.

• Brian	Morris	is	current	licensed	student	pilot.	(certificate	#	zz	334548)

• Brian	Morris	has	previously	flown	over	30,000	miles	with	both	instructiona l and	commercial	pilots

• Brian	Morris	has	completed	pilots	Ground	School	Training	With	Jeppesen Flight	School.

As	per	current	rulings	and	considerations	by	the	FAA,	Brian	Morris	and	MSCG is requesting	a	waiver	for	the	need	of	a	licensed	pilot	and	in lie of	this	requirement, offering	both	experience	and	flight	time	as	a	drone	pilot.

Brian	Morris Morning	Star	Photography

4329	SE	3 rd Street, Renton,	WA	98059

206

- 914

- 8054

brian@mscgstudio.com
Editorial Note on Part 3402
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3402 appear at 76 FR 4807, Jan. 27, 2011.

§ 3402.6 Overview of the special international study and/or thesis/dissertation research travel allowance. ( a ) For each USDA Graduate Fellow who desires to be considered for a special international study or thesis/dissertation research travel allowance, the Project Director must apply to HEP for a supplemental grant in accordance with instructions published in the solicitation. Postdoctoral Fellows are not eligible to receive the special international study or thesis/dissertation research travel allowance. Each application must include a “Proposal Cover Page” (Form NIFA-2002), “Project Summary” (Form NIFA-2003), “Budget” (Form NIFA-2004) and National Environmental Policy Act Exclusions Form (Form NIFA—2006). ( 1 ) To provide HEP with sufficient information upon which to evaluate the merits of the requests for a special international study or thesis/dissertation research travel allowance, each application for a supplemental grant must contain a narrative which provides the following: ( i ) The specific destination(s) and duration of the travel;
( ii ) The specific study or thesis/dissertation research activities in which the Fellow will be engaged;
( iii ) How the international experience will contribute to the Fellow's program of study;
( iv ) A budget narrative specifying and justifying the dollar amount requested for the travel;
( v ) Summary credentials of the faculty or other professionals with whom the Fellow will be working during the international experience (summary credentials must not exceed three pages per person);
( vi ) A letter from the dean of the Fellow's college or equivalent administrative unit supporting the Fellow's travel request and certifying that the travel experience will not jeopardize the Fellow's satisfactory progress toward degree completion; and
( vii ) A letter from the fellowship grant Project Director certifying the Fellow's eligibility, the accuracy of the Fellow's travel request, and the relevance of the travel to the Fellow's advanced degree objectives.
( 2 ) The narrative portion of the application must not exceed the page limitation included in the program solicitation.
( b ) All complete requests will be evaluated by professional staff from USDA or other Federal agencies, as appropriate. Evaluation criteria will be published in the solicitation. HEP will award grants in accordance with evaluation criteria and to the extent possible based on availability of funds.
( c ) Any current Fellow with sufficient time to complete the international experience before the termination date of the grant under which he/she is supported is eligible for a special international study or thesis/dissertation research travel allowance. Before the international study or thesis/dissertation research travel may commence, a Fellow must have completed one academic year of full-time study, as defined by the institution, under the Fellowship appointment and arrangements must have been formalized for the Fellow to study and/or conduct research in the foreign location(s).