alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# p 0 cf- ^ a ^ 2^.-% - (f71^ , Virgima, EvehA , M L Iroa , Gilber t aa dsunoundSa g busines s communitie s 40 3 Firs t Stree t North Virginia , M N 5579 2 (218)741-271 7 (218)749-491 3 Fa x

Promotin g busines s throug h educatio n an dadvocac y t o advanc e th e prosperit y o f th e regio n October 28,201 1 Mr
. Denni s DeVaney , Chie f Essential Air

Servic e Divisio n Offic e o f Aviatio n Analysi s X-5 3 Roo mW86-30 8 Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 1200 Ne w Jerse y Avenu e Southeas t Washington , D C 2059 0 Dea r Mr
. DeVaney , O n behal f o f th e Boar dof

Director s o f

th e Laurentian Chamber

o f Commerce , I a m strongl y advcKsatin

g your consideratio n t o accep t

th e first optio n for

servic e firomDelt a Airlines , Inc. , whic h provide s fo r 1 4 round-tri p flight s weekl y wit h CRJ-20 0 aircraft
. Our chambe r represent s th e busines s interest s o f nearl y 30 0 member s an dconservativel y some 800 0 employee s fromHibbin g t o th e wes t an dEl y t o th e east . ^ 3 r*j ' P ' T T c n C D ' ^

r > r; V ? fr^ i --^-r' n :^.~H—- f 

## i50 0 C/ J

Investor s an dother

personne l wit

h importan t

role s i n our

developin g industrie s utiliz e th e local airpor

t fo r th e convenienc e o f

thes e dail y flight s Regional sale s representative s an d other s executive s ar e utilizin g th e servic e fo r on e da y busines s trip s t o th e area . Th e number s o f

seat s bein g booke dthroug h th e airpor t clearl y confir

mth e viabilit

y o f maintainin g weekl y flights. Th e hub' s proximit

y o f les s than thirty minute s t o mos t area s o f th e Iro n Rang e an dth e Quadcitie s als o afford s traveler s th e opportunit y t o sightse e an dexperienc e th e are a whil e o n busines s here
. Rang e Regional Airpor t provide s apositiv e economi c impac t t o th e entir e region ; th e potential fo r significant

los s o f revenue s t o th e areadia t

woul d accompany areduce dflight schedul e mus t

b e recognized
. Thank yo u fo r you r tim e an dyou r

thoughtfu l consideration
. JimCurri e

Presiden t Laurentian Chamber

o f Commerc e
§ 3550.58 Ownership requirements. After the loan is closed, the borrower must have an acceptable interest in the property as evidenced by one of the following. ( a ) *Fee-simple ownership.* Acceptable fee-simple ownership is evidenced by a fully marketable title with a deed vesting a fee-simple interest in the property to the borrower.
( b ) *Secure leasehold interest.* A written lease is required. To be acceptable, a leasehold interest must have an unexpired term that is at least 150 percent of the term of the mortgage, unless the loan is guaranteed, in which case the unexpired term of the lease must be at least 2 years longer than the loan term. In no case may the unexpired term be less than 25 years.
( c ) *Life estate interest.* To be acceptable a life estate interest must provide the borrower with rights of present possession, control, and beneficial use of the property. Generally, persons with any remainder interests must be signatories to the mortgage. All of the remainder interests need not be included in the mortgage to the extent that one or more of the persons holding remainder interests are not legally competent (and there is no representative who can legally consent to the mortgage), cannot be located, or if the remainder interests are divided among such a large number of people that it is not practical to obtain the signatures of all of the remainder interests. In such cases, the loan may not exceed the value of the property interests owned by the persons executing the mortgage.
( d ) *Undivided interest.* All legally competent co-owners will be required to sign the mortgage. When one or more of the co-owners are not legally competent (and there is no representative who can legally consent to the mortgage), cannot be located, or the ownership interests are divided among so large a number of co- owners that it is not practical for all of their interests to be mortgaged, their interests not exceeding 50 percent may be excluded from the security requirements. In such cases, the loan may not exceed the value of the property interests owned by the persons executing the mortgage.
( e ) *Possessory rights.* Acceptable forms of ownership include possessory rights on an American Indian reservation or State-owned land and the interest of an American Indian in land held in severalty under trust patents or deeds containing restrictions against alienation, provided that land in trust or restricted status will remain in trust or restricted status.
###### Editorial Note on Part 3406

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3406 appear at 76 FR 4809, Jan. 27, 2011.

#### § 3406.3 Institutional eligibility.

Proposals may be submitted by any of the 16 historically black 1890 land-grant institutions and Tuskegee University. The 1890 land-grant institutions are: Alabama A&M University; University of Arkansas—Pine Bluff; Delaware State University; Florida A&M University; Fort Valley State College; Kentucky State University; Southern University and A&M College; University of Maryland—Eastern Shore; Alcorn State University; Lincoln University; North Carolina A&T State University; Langston University; South Carolina State University; Tennessee State University; Prairie View A&M University; and Virginia State University. An institution eligible to receive an award under this program includes a research foundation maintained by an 1890 land-grant institution or Tuskegee University.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T22:24:58-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
###### Editorial Note on Part 3405

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3405 appear at 76 FR 4808, Jan. 27, 2011.

#### § 3405.14 Proposal review.

The proposal evaluation process includes both internal staff review and merit evaluation by peer review panels comprised of scientists, educators, business representatives, and Government officials. Peer review panels will be selected and structured to provide optimum expertise and objective judgment in the evaluation of proposals.
#### § 3430.54 Indirect costs.

Indirect cost rates for grants and cooperative agreements shall be determined in accordance with 2 CFR part 200, unless superseded by another authority. Any restriction on indirect costs is to be identified in the request for applications as appropriate. Use of indirect costs as in-kind matching contributions is subject to § 3430.52(b).

[81 FR 6414, Feb. 8, 2016]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2305 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2305

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to repeal the amendments 
   made by the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 requiring documentation 
  evidencing citizenship or nationality as a condition for receipt of 
             medical assistance under the Medicaid program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 16, 2006

   Mr. Akaka (for himself, Mr. Obama, Mr. Bingaman, Mr. Inouye, Mr. 
Lautenberg, Mr. Jeffords, Mr. Kerry, and Mr. Lieberman) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to repeal the amendments 
   made by the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 requiring documentation 
  evidencing citizenship or nationality as a condition for receipt of 
             medical assistance under the Medicaid program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT FOR DOCUMENTATION EVIDENCING 
              CITIZENSHIP OR NATIONALITY AS A CONDITION FOR RECEIPT OF 
              MEDICAL ASSISTANCE UNDER THE MEDICAID PROGRAM.

    (a) Repeal.--Subsections (i)(22) and (x) of section 1903 of the 
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396b), as added by section 6036 of the 
Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, are each repealed.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Section 1903 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
        1396b) is amended--
                    (A) in subsection (i)--
                            (i) in paragraph (20), by adding ``or'' 
                        after the semicolon at the end; and
                            (ii) in paragraph (21), by striking ``; 
                        or'' and inserting a period;
                    (B) by redesignating subsection (y), as added by 
                section 6043(b) of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, 
                as subsection (x); and
                    (C) by redesignating subsection (z), as added by 
                section 6081(a) of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, 
                as subsection (y).
            (2) Subsection (c) of section 6036 of the Deficit Reduction 
        Act of 2005 is repealed.
    (c) Effective Date.--The repeals and amendments made by this 
section shall take effect as if included in the enactment of the 
Deficit Reduction Act of 2005.
                                 <all>
```
----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  /s/ Richard W. McCullough                    |   | November 5, 2010 |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------|
| Richard W. McCullough                              |   |
| Chief Executive Officer                            |   |
| Petroleum Development Corporation (dba PDC Energy) |   |
| Managing General Partner                           |   |
|                                               |   |
|  /s/ Gysle R. Shellum                         |   | November 5, 2010 |
| Gysle R. Shellum                                   |   |
| Chief Financial Officer                            |   |
| Petroleum Development Corporation (dba PDC Energy) |   |
| Managing General Partner                           |   |
|                                               |   |

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) hereby gives notice that members of the Commission and/or Commission staff may attend the following meeting: FERC/NARUC Collaborative on Smart Response: Omni Hotel at CNN Center, 100 CNN Center, Atlanta, GA 30303. November 14, 2010 (8:15 a.m.-12:30 p.m.).

                    Further information may be found at                     *http://annual.narucmeetings.org/​Program.cfm.*

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-29305 Filed 11-19-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED May 4, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-40154 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaint iffAppellee,

versus SAMUEL D. BENCOSME, also known as Samuel De Jesus Bencosme De La Cruz,
DefendantAppellant.

---------------------------------------------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:02-CR-157-1

--------------------------------------------------------- Before SMITH, DeMOSS and STEWART, Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM: *
Samuel D. Bencosme entered a conditional guilty plea to possession of cocaine with intent

to distribute the same. He appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress all physical, documentary, and other evidence that was seized after he consented t o have his car searched
fo llo wing a traffic stop. Bencosme fails to show that the district court’s finding that Bencosme-2-

voluntarily consented to the search of his automobile was clearly erroneous. S ee United States v.
Mendoza-Gonzalez , 318 F.3d 663, 666 (5th Cir. 2003); United States v. Zucco , 71 F.3d 188, 191 (5th Cir. 1995). The district court’s denial of Bencosme’s motion to suppress evidence is AFFIRMED.
§ 3434.5 Agriculture-related fields. ( a ) The Secretary shall use the Classification of Instructional Programs (CIP) coding system developed by the U.S. Department of Education's National Center for Education Statistics as the source of information for all existing instructional programs. This source is located at *http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/cipcode .*
( b ) A complete list of instructional programs deemed to be agriculture-related fields by the Secretary is provided in Appendix A to this part. This list will include the full six-digit CIP code and program title (or major) for each agriculture-related instructional program.
( c ) The list of agriculture-related fields will be updated every five years starting in 2015. However, the Secretary reserves the right to make changes at any time, if deemed appropriate and necessary.
( d ) Any changes made in the CIP coding system by the U.S. Department of Education may result in a review or reevaluation of the list of agriculture-related fields by the Secretary.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

VINODH RAGHUBIR,

Petitioner,

v. 4:20cv203–WS/MJF

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.,

Respondents.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (ECF

No. 3) dated April 29, 2020. The magistrate judge recommends that this case be

dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Petitioner has filed objections (ECF No. 4) to the

report and recommendation. 

 Having reviewed the record in this case in light of Petitioner’s objections,

the undersigned has determined that the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation is due to be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF No. 3) is hereby

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order.

Case 4:20-cv-00203-WS-MJF Document 6 Filed 05/14/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

2. Petitioner’s petition (ECF No. 1) for writ of habeas corpus and this action

are hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

3. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: “All claims are DISMISSED for

lack of jurisdiction.”

4. The clerk shall separately docket Petitioner’s Notice of Appeal (currently

attached to his objections) and forward that notice to the Eleventh Circuit..

DONE AND ORDERED this 14th day of May , 2020.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:20-cv-00203-WS-MJF Document 6 Filed 05/14/20 Page 2 of 2
###### Editorial Note on Part 3405

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3405 appear at 76 FR 4808, Jan. 27, 2011.

#### § 3405.7 Joint project proposals.

Applicants are encouraged to submit joint project proposals as defined in § 3405.2(m), which address regional or national problems and which will result overall in strengthening higher education in the food and agricultural sciences. The goals of such joint initiatives should include maximizing the use of limited resources by generating a critical mass of expertise and activity focused on a targeted need area(s), increasing cost-effectiveness through achieving economies of scale, strengthening the scope and quality of a project's impact, and promoting coalition building likely to transcend the project's lifetime and lead to future ventures.
§ 3560.701 General. ( a ) This subpart contains the policies for recapturing unauthorized assistance when the Agency determines that a borrower or tenant was ineligible for, or improperly used, assistance received from the Agency.
( b ) The Agency may seek repayment of any unauthorized assistance provided to a borrower or tenant, plus the cost of collection, regardless of whether the unauthorized assistance was due to errors by the Agency, the borrower, or the tenant.
Editorial Note on Part 3415
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3415 appear at 76 FR 4811, Jan. 27, 2011.

§ 3415.7 Use of funds; changes. ( a ) *Delegation of fiscal responsibility.* The grantee may not in whole or in part delegate or transfer to another person, institution, or organization the responsibility for use or expenditure of grant funds.
( b ) *Change in project plans.* ( 1 ) The permissible changes by the grantee, principal investigator(s), or other key project personnel in the approved grant shall be limited to changes in methodology, techniques, or other aspects of the project to expedite achievement of the project's approved goals. If the grantee or the principal investigator(s) is uncertain whether a particular change complies with this provision, the question must be referred to the awarding official of NIFA or ARS, as appropriate, for a final determination.
( 2 ) Changes in approved goals, or objectives, shall be requested by the grantee and approved in writing by the awarding official of NIFA or ARS, as appropriate, prior to effecting such changes. Normally, no requests for such changes that are outside the scope of the original approved project will be approved.
( 3 ) Changes in approved project leadership or the replacement or reassignment of other key project personnel shall be requested by the grantee and approved in writing by the awarding official of NIFA or ARS, as appropriate, prior to effecting such changes.
( 4 ) Transfers of actual performance of the substantive programmatic work in whole or in part and provisions for payment of funds, whether or not Federal funds are involved, shall be requested by the grantee and approved in writing by the awarding official of NIFA or ARS, as appropriate, prior to effecting such changes, unless prescribed otherwise in the terms and conditions of a grant.
( c ) *Changes in project period.* The project period determined pursuant to § 3415.5(b) may be extended by the awarding official of NIFA or ARS, as appropriate, without additional financial support, for such additional period(s) as the appropriate awarding official determines may be necessary to complete, or fulfill the purposes of, an approved project. Any extension of time shall be conditioned upon prior request by the grantee and approval in writing by the appropriate awarding official, unless prescribed otherwise in the terms and conditions of a grant.
( d ) *Changes in approved budget.* The terms and conditions of a grant will prescribe the circumstances under which written approval must be requested and obtained from the awarding official of NIFA or ARS, as appropriate, prior to instituting changes in an approved budget.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TWC Holding LLC (the “Company”) for thethirteen weeks and thirty-nine weeks ended September 30, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, BrianA. Lutes, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of TheSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 14, 2006

 
|        |   | By:    | /s/ Brian A. Lutes      |
|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   |   | Brian A. Lutes          |
|   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

Asigned original of this written statement, or other document authenticating,acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement, has been provided tothe Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
§ 353.5 Application for certification. ( a ) To request the services of an inspector, a written application (PPQ Form 572) shall be made as far in advance as possible, and shall be filed in the office of inspection at the port of certification. Forms will be submitted using a U.S. Government electronic information exchange system or other authorized method.
( b ) Each application shall be deemed filed when delivered to the proper office of inspection. When an application is filed, a record showing the date and time of filing shall be made in such office.
( c ) Only one application for any consignment shall be accepted, and only one certificate for any consignment shall be issued.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0052) [61 FR 15368, Apr. 8, 1996, as amended at 64 FR 72264, Dec. 27, 1999; 72 FR 35917, July 2, 2007; 81 FR 40151, June 21, 2016]
§ 3560.571 Loan and grant closing. The requirements established in § 3560.72 apply to all applications for off-farm labor housing loans and grants. In addition, the following requirements apply. ( a ) A nonprofit organization will have its Board of Directors adopt an Agency-approved loan and/or grant resolution, which is required as part of the loan docket before loan and/or grant approval. All other loan applicants will execute an Agency-approved loan agreement.
( b ) For grants, an Agency approved grant agreement, must be executed by the applicant on the date of grant closing.
( c ) The obligations incurred by the applicant, as a condition of accepting the grant, will be in accordance with the off-farm labor housing grant agreement.
( d ) Off-farm labor housing loans used to build or acquire new units made pursuant to a contract entered into on or after the effective date of this regulation, will be subject to the restrictive-use provision stated in § 3560.72(a)(2)(ii). All other off-farm labor housing loans are subject to the restrictive-use provisions contained in their loan documents and as outlined in subpart N of this regulation. Such restrictions must be included in the mortgage and deed of trust.