alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations 

West Building Ground Floor, 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: David MollllC, Docket No. FAA-2015-5947 

Dear Sirs: 

r 

March 4, 2016 

In response to your denial of my application for a drone exemption because I did not 

appropriately address the reason(s) why granting the request would be in the public interest, 

please allow me to then take a different approach than my initial application did. 

In 1972, I earned my Commercial Pilot's license. This gave me the privilege of earning a living as 

a pilot in the field of aviation. While this is a personal benefit, it also directly benefits the public 

interest in the following manor. 

• In these 44 years I've held a Commercial Certificate, and subsequently an ATP 

Certificate, combined with over 11,000 flight hours I've never had one FAA violation. 

Plus as a CFI, CFII and MEl, I am fully aware on how to teach flight operations in a 

manner consistent with the FAR's. 

• Having Commercial pilots who have a long history of following the rules flying drones 

is a far better public benefit than non-pilots who constantly make the evening news 

demonstrating actions detrimental to aviation as a whole, and in many cases 

detrimental to common sense safety. The SUAS industry has a serious credibility at 

this time because of this. 

• I believe a long history of safety goes far above the spirit of public benefit. 

In a non-professional pilot level, additional public benefits are as follows: 

• By granting an exemption the FAA will fulfill Congress's intent of allowing SUAS to 

operate with significant safety precautions in low risk environments. 

• The use of SUAS can significantly reduce the risk to workers offalls while inspecting, 

surveying, or monitoring various projects. Falls are a leading source of workplace 

fatalities 
• SUAS can inspect, photograph, collect data and reveal hidden flaws on hard to get to 

areas relating to construction, real estate, agriculture and many other facets of today's 

economy. 

• SUAS reduce the environmental impact by dramatically decreasing the energy used for 

data collection. 

• SUAS use rechargeable lithium ion batteries, as opposed to fossil fuel 

I hope you reconsider my exemption application. 

Lastly, I need to correct one minor error. The name of the LLC is: David L. Moll LLC 

David Moll 

Member 

David L. Moll LLC 

P.O. Box 96 

Greenwood, NE 68366
Exhibit 10.13 (c)


 


[NBC Letterhead]


 


February 1, 2005


 


Young Broadcasting, Inc. (as Licensee)


Davenport, Iowa


 


Re:  KWQC-TV, Davenport, Iowa


 


Reference is made to the Affiliation Agreement, dated February 3,
1995, between Broad Street Television L.P. (as predecessor-in-interest to
Licensee) and NBC (the “Affiliation Agreement”) and the notice of cancellation,
dated September 17, 2003, of the KWQC-TV Affiliation Agreement.


 


NBC will agree to extend the term of the Affiliation Agreement through February
28, 2005, while a new agreement is negotiated; provided that NBC shall have no
obligation to pay Licensee or Station any amount of money in connection with
the Station’s affiliation (such as compensation or contractual promotion
reimbursement) as of the date hereof. 
The parties agree that in the event a new affiliation agreement is
signed on or prior to February 28, 2005, such new agreement will supercede the
Affiliation Agreement as of November 1, 2004.


 


If you are in agreement with the above, please indicate your acceptance
by signing in the space provided below, and return two original to us.


 


Very truly yours,


 


NBC Universal, Inc.


 


	
  By:

  	
  /s/    John Damiano

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  John Damiano

  
	
   

  	
  Executive Vice President, Affiliate Relations

  



 


ACCEPTED AND AGREED:


 


YOUNG BROADCASTING, INC.


 


	
  By:

  	
  /s/   Deborah A. McDermott

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Name: Deborah A. McDermott

  
	
   

  	
  Title: President

  



 





















 


 


[NBC Letterhead]


 


December 21, 2004


 


Young Broadcasting, Inc. (as Licensee)


Davenport, Iowa


 


Re:  KWQC-TV, Davenport, Iowa


 


Reference is made to the Affiliation Agreement, dated February 3,
1995, between Broad Street Television L.P. (as predecessor-in-interest to
Licensee) and NBC (the “Affiliation Agreement”) and the notice of cancellation,
dated September 17, 2003, of the KWQC-TV Affiliation Agreement.


 


NBC will agree to extend the term of the Affiliation Agreement through January
31, 2005, while a new agreement is negotiated; provided that NBC shall have no
obligation to pay Licensee or Station any amount of money in connection with
the Station’s affiliation (such as compensation or contractual promotion
reimbursement) as of the date hereof. 
The parties agree that in the event a new affiliation agreement is
signed on or prior to January 31, 2005, such new agreement will supercede the
Affiliation Agreement as of November 1, 2004.


 


If you are in agreement with the above, please indicate your acceptance
by signing in the space provided below, and return two original to us.


 


Very truly yours,


 


NBC Universal, Inc.


 


	
  By:

  	
  /s/    John Damiano

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  John Damiano

  
	
   

  	
  Executive Vice President, Affiliate Relations

  



 


ACCEPTED AND AGREED:


 


YOUNG BROADCASTING, INC.


 


	
  By:

  	
  /s/   Deborah A. McDermott

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Name: Deborah A. McDermott

  
	
   

  	
  Title: President
#### § 3560.560 Security.

The security requirements established in § 3560.61 will apply to all applications for off-farm labor housing loans.
#### Owens *vs.*Snodgrass and Wife.

Case.

[Mr. J. S. Henderson for plaintiff: no appearance for defendants.]

From the Circuit Court for Rockcastle County.

*April*14.

A joint action against husband and wife for a fraud in the sale “ofbCe^’^ta“ed; for, as to anTnt action lies fora fraud in a *void*sale. Even a plea of infancy may defeat such an action by avoiding the contract; and when the dec'n shows that a *feme covert*is sued, it may be demurred to, as showing a void sale, or a misjoinder, ¡f she is sued with her husband.

Chief Justice Robertson

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

Owens sued Snodgrass and his wife, in an action of tresnass on the case, for imputed fraud in a contract for an v ’ r . .... exchange *of “their”*horse for his — averring, m his declaration, that, to induce him to make the exchange, they, the husband and wife, though they both knew that “ *their*” horse was secretly and irremediably diseased, falsely and fraudulently represented to him, that it was *J*, , a sound horse.

*230The Circuit Court having sustained a demurrer to the declaration, Owens now seeks a reversal of that judgment.

As we cannot, from any thing averred, presume, either that Mrs. Snodgrass had any legal interest in the horse described as the joint property of herself and husband, or that she had any legal power to sell or exchange it, the only judicial deduction is, that, as to her, the contract of exchange was *void*in consequence of her coverture.

And, though *a feme covert*may be guilty of a tort, either separately or conjointly with her husband, yet she cannot, in our opinion, be precluded from relying on her coverture as a bar to legal liability for a fraud committed by her in a contract which her disability made void. It has been decided that, in an action against an infant, for fraud in the sale of a horse, the plea of infancy will be a good bar; “for the action depended on the contract, and, by pleading infancy, the defendant elected to avoid the contract.” And the contract being thus avoided, there could be no ground for recovering damages for fraud .in making it.

The only essential difference between infancy and coverture, in this respect, is, that the contract of an infant, being only voidable, must be avoided by plea, and that of a married woman being *void,*she may demur to a declaration showing that' fact. But if an infant cannot be made liable for fraud in a contract, when he shall have elected to avoid it, a *fortiori, a*feme covert should' not be made responsible for a fraud in a contract *ipso facto void.*

Then, as the declaration shows that Mrs. Snodgrass was riot subject to the plaintiff’s action, it seems to us that the joint demurrer was properly sustained for a misjoinder of defendants, apparent on the face of the declaration. 2 *Saunders,*117, *b,*and 1 *Chitty on Pleading,*99.

Wherefore, it is considered that the judgment .of the Circuit Court be affirmed.
#### Sal Jenkins, Appellant, v New York City Housing Authority, Respondent.

[813 NYS2d 301]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael D. Stallman, J.) entered October 27, 2005, which granted petitioner’s motion for renewal, but, upon renewal, adhered to the prior order, same court and Justice, entered March 30, 2005, denying petitioner’s application for leave to file a late notice of claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from the March 30, 2005 order unanimously dismissed, without costs, as superseded by the appeal from the subsequent order.

The purported error in ascertaining the correct party to sue *320did not constitute an adequate excuse for petitioner’s delay in filing a notice of claim *(see Seif v City of New York,*218 AD2d 595 [1995]). Petitioner’s application was also deficient due to its failure to make any showing that respondents had actual knowledge of the facts and circumstances constituting the claim within the statutorily prescribed 90-day filing period or within a reasonable time thereafter, and its failure to show that the lack of timely notice would not prejudice respondents’ investigation and defense of the claim *(see*General Municipal Law § 50-e [5]; *Pineda v City of New York,*305 AD2d 294 [2003]; *Chattergoon v New York City Hous. Auth.,*161 AD2d 141 [1990], *affd*78 NY2d 958 [1991]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Friedman, Marlow and Malone, JJ.
Exhibit 5  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the annual report of Petro-Canada (the Company) on
Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald
A. Brenneman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Ronald
  A. BrennemanRonald A.
  BrennemanPresident
  and Chief Executive OfficerMarch 25,
  2004
#### § 3560.500 OMB control number.

The information collection requirements contained in this regulation have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and have been assigned OMB control number 0575-0189. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to vary from 15 minutes to 18 hours per response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. A person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSummary of a study to determine low-velocity impact damage and residual tension strength for a thick graphite/epoxy motor caseImpacters of various shapes and masses were dropped from various heights onto 36 mm (1.4 in.) thick graphite/epoxy cylinders, which represented filament wound cases (FWC) for the booster motors of the Space Shuttle. Insert solid propellant was cast into some of the cylinders. The cylinders were impacted numerous times around the circumference and then cut into 51 mm (2.0 in.) wide tension specimens, each containing an impact site. Four indenters were used: a sharp corner, two hemispheres, and a bolt-like rod. The diameters of the hemispheres were 12.7 mm mm (0.5 in.) and 25.4 mm (1.0 in.), and the diameter of the rod was 6.3 mm (0.25 in.). Impacts with the rod were simulated by pressing the rod against the face of specimens. For the hemispheres, the damage initiated beneath the surface at a critical contact pressure and was not visible on the surface until an even larger pressure was exceeded. The damage consisted of matrix cracking and broken fiber. The rod an corner made visible surface damage in all tests. For the hemispheres, the tension strength was reduced considerably before the damage was visible on the surface, 30 percent for the 25.4 mm (1.0 in.) diameter hemisphere and 10 percent for the 12.7 mm (0.5 in.) diameter hemisphere. Analytical methods were used to predict the damage and residual tension strength. A factor of safety to account for nonvisible damage was determined.Document ID19900016058Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsPoe, C. C., Jr.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1990Subject CategoryStructural MechanicsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-102678NAS 1.15:102678Accession Number90N25374Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-63-01-05Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900016058.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 32.2





Certification of Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of SRKP 3, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony C. Pintsopoulos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Anthony C. PintsopoulosAnthony C. PintsopoulosPrincipal Financial OfficerMay 11, 2011
98- 1540.

#### State v. Allen.

Fayette App. No. CA97-02-004. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.
PROMISSORY NOTE


EXHIBIT 10.5




PROMISSORY NOTE




THIS PROMISSORY NOTE is made as of the 26th day of November 2012 at 7877 Emerald Winds Circle, Boynton Beach, Florida 33473.




FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned Mister Goody, Inc., a Florida corporation (“Maker”), promises to pay to the order of Joel Arberman (“Payee”) the principal sum of ten thousand dollars ($10,000) in lawful money of the United States of America. This Promissory Note has zero interest.




Repayment of the principal shall be made on March 31, 2013. Maker may prepay the principal hereof in whole or in part at any time and from time to time without penalty or premium.




Maker hereby irrevocably waives presentment, protest, notice of protest, and dishonor. If any principal or interest is not paid within fifteen (15) days of the date when due, the holder hereof, at his option, may declare all remaining installments of principal immediately due and payable and proceed to collect the same at once.




MAKER:







By: /s/ Joel Arberman                    

      Joel Arberman, president
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-K/A of Boundless Motor Sports Racing, Inc.
and subsidiaries (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned President and
Principal Accounting and Financial Officer of the Company each hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: March 2, 2005
    
    /s/ Paul A. KrugerPaul A Kruger, Chief Executive OfficerDate: March 2, 2005
    
    /s/ Glenn A. JacksonGlenn A. Jackson, Chief Accounting Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2251 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2251

 To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to repeal the ultra-deepwater 
and unconventional onshore natural gas and other petroleum research and 
                          development program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 7, 2006

   Mr. Wyden introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to repeal the ultra-deepwater 
and unconventional onshore natural gas and other petroleum research and 
                          development program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Withdraw Energy Addicting New 
Subsidies Act of 2006'' or the ``WEANS Act of 2006''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF ULTRA-DEEPWATER AND UNCONVENTIONAL ONSHORE NATURAL 
              GAS AND OTHER PETROLEUM RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM.

    Subtitle J of title IX of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 
16371 et seq.) is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
----

----

Fox Petroleum Inc.  10-Q/A

| (1)   | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                     |   |                                                                   |   |
|--------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date: September 29, 2011 | By:    | /s/ William Lieberman                                                  |   |
|                     |   | William Lieberman                                                      |   |
|                     |   | Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Fox Petroleum Inc. |   |
|                     |   |                                                                   |   |
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 17, 2017

p05 10 

# Order

Clerk May 17, 2017

154923

- 4

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 154923

COA: 330389

Oakland CC: 2014

- 250982

- FH

LYMANCE ENGLISH,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 154924

COA: 330390

Oakland CC: 2015

- 255117

- FH

BRANDON RENAR SMITH,

Defendant

- App ellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 27, 2016

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

W ILDER , J., did not participate because he was on the Court of Appeals panel.
#### Nassau Insurance Company, Appellant, v Susan Riley et al., Respondents.

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration under the terms of the uninsured motorist endorsement of a policy of insurance, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 6, 1979, which, upon an agreed statement of facts, (1) granted the cross motion for summary judgment of respondent Government Employees Insurance Company (GEICO), (2) dismissed the petition, and (3) directed the petitioner to proceed to arbitration. Judgment affirmed, with one bill of $50 costs and disbursements payable to respondent GEICO. In our view, the text of the statement of financial security contained in respondent GEICO’s notice of cancellation strictly complied with the statutory mandate set forth in subdivision 1 of section 313 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law (cf. Judiciary Law, § 756). As this was the only issue submitted to Special Term for determination, the judgment should be affirmed. Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Gulotta and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)

I, Richard Heyse,
certify that:

1. the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Innophos, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided Innophos, Inc. and will be retained by Innophos, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to
update the foregoing certification except as required by law.

Date: May 14, 2007



/s/ RICHARD HEYSERichard HeyseVice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to the requirements of 18
U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as a part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### § 29.63 When application may be withdrawn.

An application may be withdrawn at any time before the requested service is rendered upon payment of expenses incurred in connection therewith as provided in § 29.124.