alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 3403
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3403 appear at 76 FR 4807, Jan. 27, 2011.

§ 3403.13 Notice of grant awards. ( a ) The grant award document may include the following: ( 1 ) Legal name and address of performing organization or institution;
( 2 ) Title of project;
( 3 ) Name and institution of Project Director's chosen to direct and control approved activities;
( 4 ) Identifying grant number assigned by the Department;
( 5 ) Project period, specifying the amount of time the Department intends to support the project;
( 6 ) Total amount of Departmental financial assistance approved for the project period;
( 7 ) Legal authority(ies) under which the grant is awarded;
( 8 ) Appropriate Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number;
( 9 ) Applicable award terms and conditions;
( 10 ) Approved budget plan for categorizing allocable project funds to accomplish the stated purpose of the grant award; and
( 11 ) Other information or provisions deemed necessary by NIFA to carry out its respective granting activities or to accomplish the purpose of a particular grant.
( b ) [Reserved]
<PAGE>

                                                       Exhibit 21
                           Exhibit 21

               List of Subsidiaries of Registrant
      (Majority or Wholly Owned Unless Otherwise Indicated)

Name of Subsidiary                      State of Incorporation

NRG Generating (Newark) Cogeneration, Inc.   Delaware
NRG Generating (Parlin) Cogeneration, Inc.   Delaware
O'Brien (Philadelphia) Cogeneration, Inc.    Delaware
NRG Generating Ltd.                          United Kingdom
PoweRent*                                    United Kingdom
Puma Manufacturing Ltd.                      United Kingdom
Puma Export Finance Ltd.                     United Kingdom
Puma Freight Forwarding Ltd.                 United Kingdom
Puma Far East Ltd.                           United Kingdom
Enercol Energy Systems, Ltd.                 United Kingdom
O'Brien Energy Europe                        United Kingdom
Philadelphia Biogas Supply, Inc.             Delaware
NRGG Parlin Supply Corporation               Delaware
NRGG Newark Supply Corporation               Delaware
Grays Ferry Cogeneration Partnership*        Pennsylvania
NRGG (Schuylkill) Cogeneration Inc.          Delaware
Grays Ferry Services Partnership             Pennsylvania
NRGG Funding, Inc.                           Delaware
NRG Morris, Inc.                             Delaware
NRG (Morris) Cogen, LLC                      Delaware
O'Brien Energy Services Company              Delaware
O'Brien Power Equipment, Inc.                Texas
O'Brien Mobile Power Rental Company          Delaware
NRGG (Asia), Inc.                            Delaware
Power Service Company                        Delaware
O'Brien Fuels, Inc.                          Delaware
SDN Power, Inc.                              Delaware

* The Company owns 50% or less of the equity interest in these
subsidiaries.

                                   52
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 224 (Monday, November 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71154-71155]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29367]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 50-320; License No. DPR-73; NRC-2010-0358]


Receipt of Request for Action Under 10 CFR 2.206

    Notice is hereby given that by petition dated September 30, 2010, 
Mr. Eric J. Epstein has requested that pursuant to Title 10 of the Code 
of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), Section 2.206, ``Requests for Action 
under this Subpart,'' the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) take 
action with regard to the Three Mile Island Unit-2 (TMI-2) Nuclear 
Power Station. Mr. Epstein requests that the Commission take 
enforcement action in the form of a Demand for Information from 
FirstEnergy relating to inadequate financial assurance provided by the 
licensee for TMI-2's nuclear decommissioning fund prior to the 
consummation of FirstEnergy's proposed merger with Allegheny Energy. As 
the basis for this request, the petitioner states that the current 
radiological decommissioning cost estimate is $831.5 million and the 
current amount in the decommissioning trust fund is $484.5 million, as 
of December 31, 2008. Further, the petitioner states that FirstEnergy's 
decommissioning report is inadequate,

[[Page 71155]]

and fails to account for the special status of TMI-2, the current level 
of underfunding, or the fact that decommissioning rate recovery for 
Metropolitan Edison and Pennsylvania Electric cease per Pennsylvania 
Public Utility Commission Orders on December 31, 2010.
    The request is being treated pursuant to 10 CFR 2.206 of the 
Commission's regulations. The request has been referred to the Director 
of the Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental 
Management Programs (FSME). As provided by 10 CFR 2.206, appropriate 
action will be taken on this petition within a reasonable time. The 
petitioner met with FSME's Petition Review Board (PRB), via 
teleconference, on October 19, 2010, to discuss the petition. The 
results of that discussion have been considered in the PRB's 
determination regarding the petitioner's request for additional 
information from FirstEnergy and in establishing the schedule for the 
review of the petition.
    Copies of the petition are available to the public from the NRC's 
Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) in the public 
Electronic Reading Room on the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html under ADAMS Accession No. ML102770308, and are 
available for inspection at the Commission's Public Document Room, 
located at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), 
Rockville, Maryland.

    Dated at Rockville, Maryland, November 9, 2010.

    For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Charles L. Miller,
Director, Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental 
Management Programs.
[FR Doc. 2010-29367 Filed 11-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
#### §§ 3560.754-3560.799 [Reserved]
§ 3.19 Standards for the compromise of claims and debt settlement. ( a ) An agency will follow the standards specified in 31 CFR part 902 for the compromise of debts pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3711 arising out of the activities of, or referred or transferred for collection services to, that agency, except where otherwise authorized or required by law.
( b ) For FSA FLP debts, the first instance of debt cancellation is exempt from the monetary limits established in 31 CFR 902.1.
( c ) For CCC debts, CCC will, in exercising its authority pursuant to section 4 of the CCC Charter Act (15 U.S.C. 714b) to make final and conclusive settlement and adjustment of any CCC claims, follow the standards specified in 31 CFR 902.2, 902.3, 902.4, 902.6, and 902.7, for the compromise of debts owed to CCC, to the maximum extent practicable. In addition to the bases for the compromise of debts specified in 31 CFR 902.2, CCC may compromise a debt when the approving official with the authority to compromise the debt has determined that such action is in the interest of CCC.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2258 

To amend the Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933 to increase the membership of the Board of Directors and require that each State in the 

service area of the Tennessee Valley Authority be represented by at 

least 1 member. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2006 

Mr. ISAKSON (for himself and Mr. CHAMBLISS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933 to 

increase the membership of the Board of Directors and 

require that each State in the service area of the Tennessee Valley Authority be represented by at least 1 

member. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MEMBERSHIP OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS. 

4 Section 2(a)(1) of the Tennessee Valley Authority Act 

5 of 1933 (16 U.S.C. 831(a)(1)) is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘9’’ and inserting ‘‘13’’; and 
2 

•S 2258 IS

1 (2) by striking ‘‘at least’’ and all that follows 

2 and inserting ‘‘, of whom at least 1 member shall be 

3 a legal resident of each State in the service area of 

4 the Corporation.’’. 

Æ
Page 1 of 2

Case No. 4:02cr56-RH

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 4:02cr56-RH

STEVEN LAMAR WILLIS,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER TERMINATING SUPERVISED RELEASE

The defendant Steven Lamar Willis served a prison term of 126 months and 

is serving a six-year term of supervised release. He has completed more than five 

years of the six-year term. The term is scheduled to end on April 5, 2018. Mr. 

Willis has moved for early termination of supervised release. 

Mr. Willis asserts—and the government does not deny—that he has a stable 

residence and stable employment. He has had no encounters with law enforcement

while on supervised release.

The government opposes early termination, noting that Mr. Willis has an

extensive criminal history (consisting of offenses committed more than 15 years 

ago) and while on supervision had one positive drug test (now more than two years 
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 4:02cr56-RH

old). The government says Mr. Willis presents a risk of recidivism and so should 

be kept on supervision. 

One way or the other, Mr. Willis’s supervision will soon end. There is no 

reason to believe the risk of recidivism is greater now than it will be next April. 

There is no reason to believe nine more months of supervision will affect the 

likelihood that Mr. Willis will revert to criminal conduct. Instead, with his criminal 

history, it is likely Mr. Willis will face a severe penalty if he reverts to criminal 

conduct, with or without nine more months of supervision.

I have considered the factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and the criteria in 

Monograph 109 as approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States. I find 

that termination of supervised release at this time is warranted by the defendant’s 

conduct and the interest of justice. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(1). Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

Mr. Willis’s term of supervised release is terminated as of June 30, 2017, at 

11:48 a.m.

SO ORDERED on June 30, 2017.

s/Robert L. Hinkle

United States District Judge
# Title

# Data

# image1.png
149 So.2d 763

#### Clara Nola HINYUP v. L. A. FREY & SONS, INC., and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company.

No. 46523.

Feb. 8, 1963.

The application is denied. According to the facts of the case, as found to be by the Court of Appeal, the judgment complained of is correct.
§ 3430.1104 Project types and priorities. ( a ) *FINI Pilot Projects (FPP).* FPPs are aimed at new entrants seeking funding for a project in the early stages of incentive program development.
( b ) *FINI Projects (FP).* FPs are aimed at mid-sized groups developing incentive programs at the local or State level.
( c ) *FINI Large Scale Projects (FLSP).* FLSPs are aimed at groups developing multi-county, State, and regional incentive programs with the largest target audience of all FINI projects.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2219 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2219

To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain sector mold press 
                               machines.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 30, 2006

  Mr. DeMint introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain sector mold press 
                               machines.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN SECTOR MOLD PRESS MACHINES.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.84.89 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain manufacturing 
equipment) is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/
2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2448 

To end unemployment payments to jobless millionaires. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 20, 2013 

Mr. LANKFORD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To end unemployment payments to jobless millionaires. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ending Unemployment 

5 Payments to Jobless Millionaires Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ENDING UNEMPLOYMENT PAYMENTS TO JOBLESS 

7 MILLIONAIRES. 

8 (a) PROHIBITION.—Notwithstanding any other provi9 sion of law, no Federal funds may be used to make pay10 ments of unemployment compensation (including such 

11 compensation under the Federal-State Extended Com12 pensation Act of 1970 and the emergency unemployment 


ebenthall on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2448 IH

1 compensation program under title IV of the Supplemental 

2 Appropriations Act, 2008) in a year to an individual whose 

3 resources in the preceding year were equal to or greater 

4 than $1,000,000. For purposes of the preceding sentence, 

5 with respect to a year, an individual’s resources shall be 

6 determined in the same manner as a subsidy eligible indi7 vidual’s resources are determined for the year under sec8 tion 1860D–14(a)(3)(E) of the Social Security Act (42 

9 U.S.C. 1395w–114(a)(3)(E)). 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The prohibition under sub11 section (a) shall apply to weeks of unemployment begin12 ning on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ebenthall on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-8186

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff – Appellee, 

 v. 

OKANG KAREEM ROCHELLE, 

 Defendant – Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, Jr., 

District Judge. (1:05-cr-00112-UA-1) 

Submitted: April 8, 2009 Decided: April 15, 2009 

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Okang Kareem Rochelle, Appellant Pro Se. Anand P. Ramaswamy, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Okang Kareem Rochelle seeks to appeal the district 

court’s October 6, 2008 oral order disposing of various motions 

filed by Rochelle. This court may exercise jurisdiction only 

over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain 

interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 

337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Rochelle seeks to appeal is 

neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or 

collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack 

of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

# AGENCY:

Department of the Interior, Office of the Assistant Secretary—Water and Science.

# ACTION:

Notice of availability of the Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) and associated Final Environmental Assessment (EA)—Realignment of a Portion of the Utah Lake Drainage Basin Water Delivery System.

# SUMMARY:

On November 15, 2010, the Department of the Interior (Interior), signed a FONSI associated with the Final EA—Realignment of a Portion of the Utah Lake Drainage Basin Water Delivery System. Interior has determined that the proposed action as detailed in the FONSI will not have a significant impact on the quality of the human environment, and that an environmental impact statement is not required.

# ADDRESSES:

Copies of the EA and FONSI are available for inspection at:
      - Central Utah Water Conservancy District, 355 West University Parkway, Orem, Utah 84058-7303.
      - Department of the Interior, Central Utah Project Completion Act Office, 302 East 1860 South, Provo, Utah 84606.

                        The documents are also available at                         *http://www.cuwcd.com*                         and                         *http://www.cupcao.gov.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION:

                        Contact Mr. Lee Baxter, Central Utah Project Completion Act Office, 302 East 1860 South, Provo, Utah 84606; (801) 379-1174; e-mail at                         *lbaxter@uc.usbr.gov.*

Date: November 17, 2010.

Reed R. Murray,

Program Director, Central Utah Project Completion Act, Department of the Interior.

[FR Doc. 2010-29582 Filed 11-23-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-RK-P
#### § 3565.1 Purpose.

The purpose of the Guaranteed Rural Rental Housing Program (GRRHP) is to increase the supply of affordable rural rental housing, through the use of loan guarantees that encourage partnerships between the Rural Housing Service, private lenders and public agencies.
#### § 322.20 Ports of entry.

A restricted organism may be imported only at a port of entry staffed by an APHIS inspector.[5] After a restricted organism has been cleared for importation at the port of entry, the organism can only be transported by a bonded commercial carrier immediately and directly from the port of entry to the containment facility or apiary identified on the permit. You may open the package containing the restricted organism only within the containment facility or apiary identified on the permit.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0207)

###### Footnotes -
  322.20

[5] To find out if a specific port is staffed by an APHIS inspector, or for a list of ports staffed by APHIS inspectors, contact Permit Unit, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 133, Riverdale, MD 20737-1236; toll-free (877) 770-5990; fax (301) 734-8700.
#### § 29.3078 Width.

The relative breadth of a tobacco leaf expressed in relation to its length. Width as an element of quality, does not apply to tobacco in strip form. (See Elements of quality.)

[24 FR 8771, Oct. 29, 1959. Redesignated at 47 FR 51722, Nov. 17, 1982. Redesignated and amended at 49 FR 16758, Apr. 20, 1984, and further redesignated at 51 FR 40407, Nov. 7, 1986]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO. 3:95cr49-RV

BRADY SNELL, DOCKET NO. 4:06mj78-WCS

Defendant.

 / 

O R D E R

The Defendant appeared before the undersigned on a first appearance today

to answer to the charges of violating his supervised release. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Defendant will be notified by mail when

to appear before Judge Vinson for a revocation hearing. Until that appearance,

Defendant will remain subject to the conditions of supervised release. 

DONE AND ORDERED on May 9, 2006.

 S/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:95-cr-03049-RV Document 86 Filed 05/09/06 Page 1 of 1
#### § 3560.558 Site requirements.

The requirements established in § 3560.58 apply to all applications for off-farm labor housing loans and grants except that off-farm labor housing are not limited to rural areas.
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________ No. 22

- 11998
Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________
MARCUS BODIE, Plaintiff

- Appellant,

versus TOWNE PARK SERVICES, LLC,

Defendant

- Appellee.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 8:21

- cv

- 01097

- SDM

- CPT

____________________ USCA11 Case: 22-11998 Document: 39-1 Date Filed: 04/10/2023 Page: 1 of 22 Opinion of the Court 22

- 11998

Before W ILSON , J ILL P RYOR , and A NDERSON , Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: Marcus Bodie, an African American, filed a complaint

a gainst Towne Park Services, LLC (Towne), alleging Towne failed to hire him because of his race in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981

. The district court granted summary judgment to Town e , finding Bodie failed to prove intentional discrimination through circumstantial evidence under either the McDonnell Douglas 1 burden

- shifting framework or the “ convincing mosaic ” 2 avenue

. After careful review of the briefs and the rec ord, we agree with the district court that Bodie failed to show Towne’s proffered,

non

- discriminatory reason for not hiring him

— administrative oversight

— was pretextual. 3 And we agree that the record lacks a “convincing mosaic” of discrimination. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s well

- reasoned decision.
AFFIRMED.

1 McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green , 411 U.S. 792 (1973).
2 See Jenkins v. Nell , 26 F.4th 1243, 1250 (11th Cir. 2022).

3 Bodie also argue that h is race was the “but

- for” cause for Towne’s failure to hire him. But Bodie pointed to no evidence to suggest that his race was the reason. In fact, the evidence shows an administrative oversight by Towne’s talent acquisition team was the reason for the n on

- hire

. USCA11 Case: 22-11998 Document: 39-1 Date Filed: 04/10/2023 Page: 2 of 2