alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Bonus Compensation Arrangement between US Concrete and Cesar Monroy



 Exhibit 10.24 
  
 Bonus Compensation Arrangement between U.S. Concrete, Inc. and Cesar Monroy 
  
 U.S. Concrete, Inc. (the “Company”) agreed with Cesar Monroy, the Company’s
Vice President – Finance, in 2003 to pay him a $25,000 bonus upon completion of refinancing of the Company’s debt. The Company completed the refinancing of its debt in March 2004, and paid Mr. Monroy the pre-arranged $25,000 bonus in
May 2004.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2292 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2292

    To provide relief for the Federal judiciary from excessive rent 
                                charges.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 15, 2006

  Mr. Specter (for himself, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Chambliss, and 
Mrs. Feinstein) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To provide relief for the Federal judiciary from excessive rent 
                                charges.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RELIEF FROM EXCESSIVE RENT CHARGES.

    Section 462 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(g) Effective October 1, 2006, rent charges established by the 
Administrator of General Services for accommodations provided to the 
judicial branch shall not exceed the actual costs of operating and 
maintaining such accommodations by the General Services Administration, 
and no amounts for shell rent, capital costs, real estate taxes (except 
for taxes actually paid by the Administrator of General Services to 
lessors), or administrative fees shall be included in such rent 
charges. The judicial branch's repayment to the Administrator of 
General Services of the cost of repair and alteration projects 
performed by the General Services Administration on judicial branch 
accommodations after October 1, 2006, shall be recovered over time in a 
manner agreed upon by the Director of the Administrative Office of the 
United States Courts and the Administrator.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Manhattan Cable TV Services, Division of Sterling Information Services, Inc., Appellant, v Michael Freyberg et al., Constituting the Tax Commission of the City of New York, Respondents.

for modification of the order of this court entered on March 29, 1979 (68 AD2d 873) which granted leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals, granted as indicated *906in the order of this court. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Fein, Sullivan and Markewich, JJ.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

LEONEL RIVERA, a.k.a. Leonal Rivera,

a.k.a. Ruben Soliz,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 15-10373

D.C. No. 2:97-cr-00040-WBS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

William B. Shubb, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 14, 2016** 

Before: BEA, WATFORD, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges.

Leonel Rivera appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for

a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

JUN 22 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Rivera contends that he is entitled to a sentence reduction under Amendment

782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. Reviewing de novo, see United States v.

Wesson, 583 F.3d 728, 730 (9th Cir. 2009), we agree with the district court that

because Rivera was sentenced as a career offender, it lacked authority to reduce his

sentence. See id. at 731-32. 

Rivera contends, however, that had the district court properly applied

Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), at his original sentencing hearing, it

would have been required to use the base offense level stated in U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1,

rather than U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1, thereby entitling him to the benefit of the changes to

section 2D1.1, despite his career offender status. Even accepting all of this as true,

Rivera cannot prevail. Amendment 782 made no changes to the base offense level

under section 2D1.1 for the drug quantity involved in Rivera’s offense. See

U.S.S.G. 2D1.1(c)(3) (2015). Rivera’s claim depends entirely on the alleged

Apprendi violation, which cannot be raised in a 3582(c)(2) proceeding. See Dillon

v. United States, 560 U.S. 817, 831 (2010) (errors that occurred at the original

sentencing are “outside the scope of the proceeding authorized by § 3582(c)(2)”). 

AFFIRMED.

2 15-10373
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 215 

To waive certain prohibitions with respect to nationals of Cuba coming to 

the United States to play organized professional baseball. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2013 

Mr. SERRANO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each 

case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 

the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To waive certain prohibitions with respect to nationals of 

Cuba coming to the United States to play organized 

professional baseball. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Baseball Diplomacy 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF CERTAIN RESTRICTIONS. 

7 (a) RESTRICTION ON EMBARGO AUTHORITY.—The 

8 authorities of section 620(a) of the Foreign Assistance Act 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•HR 215 IH

1 of 1961, those authorities under section 5(b) of the Trad2 ing with the Enemy Act that were being exercised with 

3 respect to Cuba on July 1, 1977, as a result of a national 

4 emergency declared before that date, and are being exer5 cised on the date of the enactment of this Act, and section 

6 203 of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act 

7 may not be exercised to regulate or prohibit— 

8 (1) those transactions permitted under section 

9 515.571 of title 31, Code of Federal Regulations, by 

10 or on behalf of a Cuban national who enters the 

11 United States from Cuba on a visa issued under sec12 tion 101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(b) of the Immigration and 

13 Nationality Act for the purpose of playing organized 

14 professional baseball; and 

15 (2) a Cuban national described in paragraph 

16 (1) from returning to Cuba with the earnings made 

17 in playing organized professional baseball. 

18 (b) RESTRICTION ON IMMIGRATION AUTHORITY.— 

19 The authority contained in section 212(f) of the Immigra20 tion and Nationality Act may not be used to deny a visa 

21 described in subsection (a)(1) to a Cuban national for the 

22 purpose of playing organized professional baseball. 

23 (c) INAPPLICABILITY OF OTHER RESTRICTIONS.— 

24 This section applies notwithstanding section 102(h) of the 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with 
3 

•HR 215 IH

1 Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD) 

2 Act of 1996. 

3 SEC. 3. DURATION OF VISA. 

4 A visa described in section 2(a)(1)— 

5 (1) shall permit the alien to whom the visa is 

6 issued to remain in the United States only for the 

7 duration of the baseball season; and 

8 (2) need not be renewed for subsequent entries 

9 into the United States for the duration of a valid 

10 contract entered into between the alien and the pro11 fessional baseball team with which the alien played 

12 in the preceding baseball season. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connectionwith the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TWC Holding LLC (the “Company”)for the thirteen week period ended October 1, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Michael M. Thompson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date:  November 15, 2005

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Michael M. Thompson               |   |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Michael M. Thompson                   |
|   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement, or other document authenticating,acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement, has been provided tothe Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THERMO
TERRATECH INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 28,
1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1996
<CASH>                                          60,350
<SECURITIES>                                    23,308
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,622
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,079
<INVENTORY>                                      2,937
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               180,156
<PP&E>                                         136,679
<DEPRECIATION>                                  48,830
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 405,160
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           82,821
<BONDS>                                        192,678
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,830
<OTHER-SE>                                      89,149
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   405,160
<SALES>                                         19,181
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               210,585
<CGS>                                           15,837
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  171,277
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   813
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   490
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,660
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,271
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,042
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,810
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,810
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20
        

</TABLE>
§ 3550.50 OMB control number. The information collection requirements contained in this regulation have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and have been assigned OMB control number 0575-0172. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to vary from 5 minutes to 3 hours per response, with an average of 11 ⁄ 2 hours per response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. You are not required to respond to this collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. [61 FR 59779, Nov. 22, 1996, as amended at 67 FR 78329, Dec. 24, 2002]
The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge 1

for the District of Minnesota. 

___________

No. 95-3981

___________

Dean Alexander, *

 *

Appellant, *

 * Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

 * District of Minnesota.

Steve Hokanson; Wesley * [UNPUBLISHED]

Neidermeier, *

 *

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: June 6, 1996

 Filed: June 12, 1996

___________

Before McMILLIAN, WOLLMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Dean Alexander appeals the district court's order denying his motion 1

to reconsider the court's order granting defendants summary judgment in

this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We affirm.

While incarcerated at the Minnesota Correctional Facility at

Stillwater (Stillwater), Alexander filed this action alleging Chaplains

Steve Hokonson and Wesley Neidermeier violated his First Amendment rights

when they failed to accede to his demand for a vegetarian diet, which he

maintained was mandated by his Christian faith. The district court granted

defendants summary judgment, concluding Neidermeier was not a state actor

and had not acted under color of state law, and Hokonson had acted

reasonably in denying Alexander's dietary request and had not violated his

First
-2-

Amendment rights. Alexander did not appeal this judgment. More than

thirty days later, he sent the district court a letter, which the court

construed as a "motion for reconsideration," and denied. Alexander timely

appealed the denial.

Construing Alexander's letter as a motion for relief from the

judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b), we note it did not

toll the time for filing a notice of appeal from the underlying judgment,

because it was not filed within ten days of the judgment. See Fed. R. App.

P. 4(a)(4)(F) (time for filing notice of appeal is tolled by Rule 60 motion

filed no more than ten days after judgment entered). Thus, in reviewing

the district court's denial of the Rule 60(b) motion, we determine only

whether the district court abused its discretion in denying the motion; we

do not pass on the propriety of the court's underlying grant of summary

judgment. See Sanders v. Clemco Indus., 862 F.2d 161, 169 (8th Cir. 1988).

We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in

denying reconsideration, because none of the matters set forth in

Alexander's letter qualified him for Rule 60(b) relief. See Fed. R. Civ.

P. 60(b); Sanders, 862 F.2d at 169 (Rule 60(b) provides for extraordinary

relief which may be granted only upon adequate showing of exceptional

circumstances).

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2611 

To designate the headquarters building of the Coast Guard on the campus 

located at 2701 Martin Luther King, Jr., Avenue Southeast in the 

District of Columbia as the ‘‘Douglas A. Munro Coast Guard Headquarters Building’’, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 8, 2013 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To designate the headquarters building of the Coast Guard 

on the campus located at 2701 Martin Luther King, 

Jr., Avenue Southeast in the District of Columbia as 

the ‘‘Douglas A. Munro Coast Guard Headquarters 

Building’’, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The headquarters building of the Coast Guard on the 

5 campus located at 2701 Martin Luther King, Jr., Avenue 

6 Southeast in the District of Columbia shall be known and 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2611 IH

1 designated as the ‘‘Douglas A. Munro Coast Guard Head2 quarters Building’’. 

3 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

4 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

5 paper, or other record of the United States to the building 

6 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

7 to the ‘‘Douglas A. Munro Coast Guard Headquarters 

8 Building’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1

Whalen, Marilyn

From: Poentis, Aaron Y CIV NAVFAC HI, EV <aaron.poentis@navy.mil>

Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2014 6:26 PM

To: Richard Takaba (richard.takaba@doh.hawaii.gov); roxanne.kwan@doh.hawaii.gov

Cc: stuart.yamada@doh.hawaii.gov; Christiansen, Steven H CIV NAVFAC HI, PRP41; 

Shimabuku, June T. CIV NAVFAC HI, EV4; Kishaba, Raelynn I CIV NAVFAC HI, EV4; 

Tsutsui, Bruce O CIV NAVFAC HI, OPHE3; Nakamura, Peter M CIV NAVFAC HI, EV1; 

Mizuno, Arleen M CIV NAVFAC HI, PRJ412; Lovgren, Andrew C LT NAVSUP, 700; Linder, 

Steven; Pallarino, Bob

Subject: RED HILL STATUS REPORT - JULY 29, 2014

Importance: High

Hi Richard/Roxanne:

Attached are the updated information for the weekly progress report from Navy Region Hawaii, and the Fleet Logistic

Center Pearl Harbor for the week of July 29, 2014.  In a process to ease reading, only sections with changes will be

annotated.

1. Preliminary Work Plan  

a. Item 1‐ Models to estimate downward vertical migration of free product.

b. Item 2 ‐ Methods or options for non‐invasive scanning of basalt to determine area and volume of contaminant

mass prior to any drilling investigation.

c. Item 3 ‐ Methods and locations for borings to most efficiently characterize the extent of contamination.

2. Release Response Action Items (initiate immediately, complete as soon as practicable)

a. Action 1 ‐ Provide a schedule for the ventilation of Tank 5 and an estimated date to commence the investigation

of release point(s) within Tank 5.

The contractor's repair Work Plan has been received and is being reviewed.

b. Action 2 ‐ The rate of vertical migration for the released JP‐8 free product is unknown.  Information from the

previously collected basalt cores could be used for initial modeling of vertical migration.  This information is necessary to

protect drinking water resources from petroleum contamination.  Prepare models for petroleum JP‐8 releases of 10,000,

20,000 and 30,000 gallons from points at 25% intervals from the bottom to the top of Tank 5.  Progress in developing

these models should be included in the preliminary work plan.

c. Action 3 ‐ Removal of petroleum free product from the area outside the tank will reduce downward migration of

the released JP‐8 free product.  Characterization of the free product plume and recovery of free product with increased

monitoring are required to address this plume.

d. Action 4 ‐ Additional studies and procedures are required to address the potential and impact of any future

releases from the USTs within the Complex.  This will require new financial and personnel resources to complete.  

Funding for the preliminary work plan and all necessary following work is critical.

The Navy received DOH and EPA comments on the Draft Work Plan for Installation of Two Sentinel Wells.
2

The Draft Site Characterization Work Plan/ Sampling and Analysis Plan will be submitted to the DOH the week of 28 July

2014.

Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.

Vr,

Aaron
#### The State ex rel. Brown, Appellant, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Brown v. Indus. Comm.*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 327.]

(No. 96-2030

Submitted August 19, 1998

Decided October 7, 1998.)

*Law Offices of Larry Hotchkiss*and *Scott A. Bravi,*for appellant.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Janet Y. Castaneda,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission.

*328
      *Ronald J. O’Brien,*City Attorney, and *Stephanie Mitchell Hughes,*Assistant City Attorney, for appellee city of Columbus.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Douglas, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.
#### § 29.3623 Rule 22.

Sound tobacco that is wet or in doubtful-keeping order but which otherwise meets the specifications of a grade shall be treated as a subgrade by placing the special factor “W” after the grademark. This special factor does not apply to tobacco designated “No-G.”
§ 3555.355 Reducing or denying the claim. ( a ) *Determination of loss payment.* Subject to the requirements of § 3555.108, if Rural Development determines that the amount of the loss was increased due to the lender's failure to comply with the conditions of the Loan Note Guarantee, the Agency may reduce or deny any loss claim by the portion of the loss determined was caused by the lender's action or failure to act. The circumstances under which loss claims may be denied or reduced include, but are not limited to, the following lender actions: ( 1 ) Failure to adhere to required servicing and liquidation procedures as set forth in Agency regulations and guidance, including the payment of real estate taxes or hazard insurance when due;
( 2 ) Failure to report defaulted loans to Rural Development within required timeframes;
( 3 ) Failure to ensure that the security property is adequately maintained during liquidation;
( 4 ) Delay in filing a loss claim;
( 5 ) Claiming unauthorized expenses;
( 6 ) Providing unauthorized assistance;
( 7 ) Failure to obtain the required security or maintain the security position;
( 8 ) Violating usury laws;
( 9 ) Negligence, gross negligence or misrepresentation; or
( 10 ) Committing fraud, or failing to report knowledge of fraud or false information.
( b ) *Disputes.* If the lender disputes the loss claim amount determined by Rural Development, Rural Development will pay the undisputed portion of the loss claim, and the lender may appeal the decision in accordance with § 3555.4.
§ 3.18 Use and disclosure of mailing addresses. ( a ) When attempting to locate a debtor in order to collect or compromise a debt under this part or 31 CFR parts 902 through 904 or other authority, agencies may send a request to Treasury to obtain a debtor's mailing address from the records of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).
( b ) Agencies are authorized to use mailing addresses obtained under paragraph (a) of this section to enforce collection of a delinquent debt and may disclose such mailing addresses to other agencies and to collection agencies for collection purposes.