alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Transnational Industries, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended January 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jonathan A. Shaw, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.


/s/ Jonathan A. Shaw
--------------------
Jonathan A. Shaw
President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: April 28, 2003

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Transnational Industries, Inc. and will be retained by Transnational
Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SS.1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of IR BioSciences Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
Wilhelm, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and
 
 2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  IR
      BIOSCIENCES HOLDINGS, INC.Date: March
      31, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Michael K.
      WilhelmMichael
      K. WilhelmPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, an other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### § 201.37 Authorization.

When authorized by the Administrator of the Agriculture Marketing Service, or by such other person as may be designated for the purpose, Federal employees and qualified State officials, for the purposes of the Act, may draw samples of, secure information and inspect records pertaining to, and otherwise inspect seeds and screenings subject to the Act.

[15 FR 2394, Apr. 28, 1950, as amended at 59 FR 64492, Dec. 14, 1994; 85 FR 40580, July 7, 2020]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,
2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sang Park, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|                                    
|/s/ Sang Park                       
|Sang Park                           
|Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
|November 14, 2007                   

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 380.10 Stipulations. ( a ) At any time prior to the issuance of a complaint seeking a civil penalty under any of the Acts listed in § 380.1, the Administrator, in his discretion, may enter into a stipulation with any person in which: ( 1 ) The Administrator or the Administrator's delegate gives notice of an apparent violation of the applicable Act, or the regulations issued thereunder, by such person and affords such person an opportunity for a hearing regarding the matter as provided by such Act;
( 2 ) Such person expressly waives hearing and agrees to pay a specified penalty within a designated time; and
( 3 ) The Administrator agrees to accept the specified penalty in settlement of the particular matter involved if the penalty is paid within the designated time.
( b ) If the specified penalty is not paid within the time designated in such a stipulation, the amount of the stipulated penalty shall not be relevant in any respect to the penalty which may be assessed after issuance of a complaint.
[48 FR 33468, July 22, 1983]
EXHIBIT 32.2

August 8, 2006

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, NE

Washington, DC 20549

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Lazard Group LLC (the Registrant) hereby certifies that the Registrants quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                            
|----------------------------
|                            
|/s/    Michael J. Castellano
|Michael J. Castellano       
|Chief Financial Officer     

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Fox
Petroleum Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended November 30, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
the undersigned, Jonathan Wood, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                 
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

January 20, 2009

*/s/ Jonathan
Wood*Jonathan WoodChief Financial Officer and Director
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

---
#### § 3431.1 Applicability of regulations.

This part establishes the process and procedures for designating veterinarian shortage situations as well as the administrative provisions for the Veterinary Medicine Loan Repayment Program (VMLRP) authorized by the National Veterinary Medical Service Act (NVMSA), 7 U.S.C. 3151a.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certification
      of Principal Executive Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SRKP 3, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Rappaport,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Richard A. RappaportRichard
                A. Rappaport
              Principal
                Executive Officer
              July
                23, 2008
No. 89-1145.

#### McCracken *v.*City of College Park, Georgia, et al.

Sup. Ct. Ga. Certiorari denied.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-2379

JULIAN L. MITCHELL, Petitioner, versus NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING AND DRY DOCK COMPANY; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (00-0744) Submitted: June 25, 2002 Decided: July 12, 2002 Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Matthew H. Kraft, INMAN & STRICKLER, P.L.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Petitioner. Benjamin M. Mason, MASON, COWARDIN & MASON, P.C., Newport News, Virginia, for Respondents. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Julian Mitchell seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of long term disability benefits pursuant to the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C.A. §§ 901 to 950 (West 2001). Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See Mitchell v. Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Co. , No. 00-0744 (BRB April 6, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2223 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

220 Elm Avenue in Munising, Michigan, as the ‘‘Elizabeth L. Kinnunen 

Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 3, 2013 

Mr. BENISHEK (for himself, Mr. CONYERS, Mrs. MILLER of Michigan, Mr. 

CAMP, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. DINGELL, Mr. HUIZENGA of Michigan, Mr. 

AMASH, Mr. WALBERG, and Mr. KILDEE) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 220 Elm Avenue in Munising, Michigan, as 

the ‘‘Elizabeth L. Kinnunen Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELIZABETH L. KINNUNEN POST OFFICE BUILD4 ING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 220 Elm Avenue in Munising, 

7 Michigan, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Eliza8 beth L. Kinnunen Post Office Building’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2223 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Elizabeth L. 

5 Kinnunen Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### W. S. Holmes, Appellant, v. Alice Burk and W. A. Arnold, Appellee.

*47Opinion filed September 6, 1934.

M. C. McCallen and W. S. Holmes, for appellant.

Harold J. Taylor, for. appellee.

Mr. Justice Stone

delivered the opinion of the court.

At the June Term 1933 of the circuit court of Effing-ham county — July 26, 1933, a decree was rendered in favor of appellant W. S. Holmes against Alice Burk for foreclosure of a mortgage on real estate. By the same decree the court found that appellee W. A. Arnold had a prior lien to appellant on the premises. Appellant undertook to appeal from this decree. He was given time to file an appeal bond and time to file a certificate of evidence. These instruments were filed within the respective times prescribed. The certificate of evidence was approved by the trial court on October 21,1933. The term of this court to which this record should have been filed opened February 27, 1934. The record should have been filed by February 6th unless the time was extended. This gave appellant from October 21st until February 6th in which to file his appeal here in compliance with rules. Thus 108 days intervened but no record was filed. This court would have been fully warranted in dismissing *48the appeal in pursuance of appellee’s motion therefor filed on February 5th. Instead we extended the time for appellant to file until March 20th. On March 19th appellant filed a supposed record which in no sense complies with the statute and the rules of this court.

The courts have gone to great pains to simplify their rules under the statute for the use and benefit of litigants. It is imperative that they be followed. *Gibson v. Vail,*248 Ill. 432. Appellant has had more consideration from this court than the rules call for. The appeal is dismissed.

*Appeal dismissed.*
#### §§ 3555.356-3555.399 [Reserved]
C 

eft p 

Nor Is I 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

PR 22-0005 

IN RE THE MOTION OF JOHN P. SCHWARTZ 

FOR ADMISSION TO THE BAR OF THE STATE 

OF MONTANA 

_ 

CEC 2 0 2"22 

E' 

C. 

0 E 

urt 

John P. Schwartz has filed a motion for admission to the Bar of the State of Montana 

pursuant to Rule V of the Rules for Admission, Admission on Motion. The Bar Admissions 

Administrator of the State Bar of Montana has informed the Court that the Commission on 

Character and Fitness has certified that Schwartz has provided the necessary 

documentation and has satisfied the requirements prerequisite to admission on motion 

under Rule V. Therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon payment of any application fees and 

completion of any other processing requirements as set forth by the Bar Admissions 

Administrator, John P. Schwartz may be sworn in to the practice of law in the State of 

Montana. Arrangements for swearing in may be made by contacting the office of the Clerk 

of the Montana Supreme Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to Petitioner and to the State 

Bar of Montana. 

DATED this day of December, 2022. 

Chief Justice 

12/20/2022

Case Number: PR 22-0005
Justices 

2
PUBLIC LAW 108–457—DEC. 17, 2004 118 STAT. 3637

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4012 (S. 2347):

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 108–527 (Comm. on Government Reform).

SENATE REPORTS: No. 108–349 accompanying S. 2347 (Comm. on Governmental

Affairs).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):

July 14, considered and passed House.

Nov. 24, considered and passed Senate, amended.

Dec. 6, House concurred in Senate amendments.

Æ

Public Law 108–457

108th Congress

An Act

To amend the District of Columbia College Access Act of 1999 to reauthorize

for 2 additional years the public school and private school tuition assistance

programs established under the Act.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 5-YEAR REAUTHORIZATION OF TUITION ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS.

(a) PUBLIC SCHOOL PROGRAM.—Section 3(i) of the District of

Columbia College Access Act of 1999 (sec. 38—2702(i), D.C. Official

Code) is amended by striking ‘‘each of the five succeeding fiscal

years’’ and inserting ‘‘each of the 7 succeeding fiscal years’’.

(b) PRIVATE SCHOOL PROGRAM.—Section 5(f) of such Act (sec.

38—2704(f), D.C. Official Code) is amended by striking ‘‘each of

the five succeeding fiscal years’’ and inserting ‘‘each of the 7 succeeding fiscal years’’.

Approved December 17, 2004.

Dec. 17, 2004

[H.R. 4012]
#### Gihon, LLC, Respondent, v 501 Second Street, LLC, Appellant.

[815 NYS2d 656]

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring the parties’ rights and obligations under a commercial lease, the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Knipel, J.), dated October 22, 2003, as denied its motion, in effect, for leave to reargue the plaintiffs motion to hold it in contempt for failure to comply with an order of the same court dated June 14, 2002, which was determined in an order of the same court dated March 13, 2003, and (2) a money judgment of the same court dated November 13, 2003, which is in favor of the plaintiff and against it in the principal sum of $44,200.

Ordered that the order dated October 22, 2003 is affirmed insofar as appealed from; and it is further,

Ordered that the money judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the plaintiff.

It is well settled that a litigant may not raise any issue on a subsequent appeal which was raised, or could have been raised, in an earlier appeal which was dismissed for lack of prosecution *(see Bray v Cox,*38 NY2d 350 [1976]). Here, the defendant appealed from the order dated March 13, 2003. That appeal was dismissed for lack of prosecution. We decline to exercise our discretion to determine the issues raised in the present appeals, which could have been raised on the appeal from the order dated *629March 13, 2003 *(see Midlantic Commercial Leasing Corp. v Levin,*22 AD3d 727 [2005]).

Furthermore, despite the defendant’s contentions, the money judgment dated November 13, 2003 was properly entered through the signature of the court clerk *(see*CPLR 5016), and once that judgment was properly entered, “by operation of law, [it] created a lien on the defendant’s real property in [Kings] county,” including the subject premises *(Bank of N.Y. v Magri,*226 AD2d 412 [1996]; *see*CPLR 5018 [a]; 5203; *Matter of Leonard v Brescia Lbr. Corp.,*174 AD2d 621, 622 [1991]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Krausman, J.P., Luciano, Fisher and Dillon, JJ., concur.
§ 3201.120 Adhesives. ( a ) *Definition.* Adhesives are compounds that temporarily or permanently bind two item surfaces together. These products include glues and sticky tapes used in construction, household, flooring, and industrial settings. This category excludes epoxy systems.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The Federal preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 24 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than July 6, 2020, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased adhesives. By that date, Federal agencies responsible for drafting or reviewing specifications for products to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased adhesives.
[84 FR 32021, July 5, 2019]
#### § 33.7 Less than carload lot.

*Less than carload lot* means a quantity of apples in packages not exceeding 20,000 pounds gross weight or 400 standard boxes or equivalent.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCTS

Case No. 3:19md2885

LIABILITY LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

Baker, 7:20cv39

Judge M. Casey Rodgers

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones

DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS ORDER NO. 13

This Order addresses Plaintiff’s objections and counter-designations to 

Defendants’ affirmative deposition designations and Defendants’ objections to 

Plaintiff’s counter-designations thereto for the following witness depositions:

1. Gates, Kathy (2020-05-29)

2. Hamer, Jeffrey (2019-12-18)

3. Van Densen, Mark (2020-12-04)

SO ORDERED, on this 15th day of June, 2021.

M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 7:20-cv-00039-MCR-GRJ Document 172 Filed 06/15/21 Page 1 of 1
May 9, 2013

EPA meeting with members of the Chemical Users Coalition (CUC) (Attendees list attached).

CUC made a presentation on a number of issues. See attached presentation. Part of the presentation was on the article exemption (see slide 7 of the presentation) . This discussion on the article exemption was in part general and in part in reference to several proposed SNURs . Mark Greenwood of CUC and Paul Malichky of PPG stated that risk should be a consideration in whether or not to lift the artic le exemption for these SNURs and for SNURs in general.

Jeff Morris, EPA asked if there should be a specific risk consideration any time the article exemption was lifted for a SNUR. Mr. Mahlichky said yes.

Jason Leuck of Lockheed Martin said that they do n’t have the know ledge on what is in articles. They have over 30,000 products that they use.

Wendy Cleland

- Hamnett of EPA asked whether the companies go back to their suppliers and request that the a rticle not include a particular chemical

.

Charle s Inge bretson of Boeing stated that many at EPA had the impression based on what Walmart has done that every company can tell its supp l iers not to include a particular chemical in a product but that is not the case.

Summary prepared by Maria Doa, EPA.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 18, 2015. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, February 18, 2015 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A15D0240. ROBERT MIKELL, COMMISSIONER OF THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF DRIVER SERVICES v. JAYSEN HORTENSTINE.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 1418488