alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Dolce Ventures Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Carl E. Worboys,
President  of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section  1350,  as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                         /s/ Carl E. Worboys
                         -------------------
                         Carl E. Worboys
                         President, Dolce Ventures Inc.
                          (Principal Executive Officer)

                         Date: August 16, 2006
Exhibit 23

                    Consent of Independent Public Accountants

      As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
by reference of our reports dated February 15, 2000 (except with respect to the
matters discussed in Note 18, as to which the date is March 8, 2000), included
in or incorporated by reference into Thermo Instrument Systems Inc.'s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 1, 2000, into the Company's
previously filed Registration Statements as follows: Registration Statement No.
33-14980 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 33-16461 on Form S-8,
Registration Statement No. 33-14974 on Form S-8, Post Effective Amendment to
Registration Statement on Form S-4 No. 33-32579-02 on Form S-8, Registration
Statement No. 33-33577 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 33-36221 on Form
S-8, Registration Statement No. 33-37866 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No.
33-65275 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 33-37559 on Form S-8,
Registration Statement No. 333-02163 on Form S-3, Registration Statement No.
333-17707 on Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 333-86357 on Form S-8,
Registration Statement No. 333-92821 on Form S-8, and Registration Statement No.
333-96495 on Form S-8.



                                             Arthur Andersen LLP



Boston, Massachusetts
March 21, 2000
Amended Employment Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.1 
 AMENDMENT TO THE SECOND 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment dated May 1, 2009 (the “Amendment”) to the Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of October 22,
2008 (the “Agreement”), by and between Nobel Learning Communities, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Employer”) and George Bernstein, an individual (“Executive”). 
 Background 
 Executive is employed as Chief Executive Officer of Employer and
is responsible for the functions and duties assigned to that position. 
 Executive and the Employer are amending the Agreement to properly
reflect certain terms of the Agreement which were authorized by the Board of Directors of the Employer in 2007 and agreed to by Executive and which were properly reflected in the Company’s Proxy Statements dated September 27, 2007 and
September 22, 2008, but which terms were not properly reflected in the Agreement by the scriveners. 
 All capitalized terms not
defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Agreement. 
 Terms 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants and obligations hereinafter set forth, intending to be legally bound
hereby, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
 1.         Section 7.4(b)(i)(1) of the
Agreement is hereby amended, in its entirety, to read as follows: 
 “(1)     Salary. Nobel Learning shall pay
Executive a single lump-sum cash payment equal to 299% of Executive’s “base amount” within the meaning of Code Section 280G. Such lump sum payment shall be paid to Executive within thirty (30) days following the date
Executive delivers an executed Waiver and Release to Nobel Learning (as described in Section 7.4(d)), but no later than March 15 following the calendar year in which the Termination Date occurs.” 
 2.        Other Terms. All of the other terms and conditions of the Agreement, not inconsistent with the
terms of this Amendment, shall remain in full force and effect. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment the date and year first written above.

  

			
	Nobel Learning Communities, Inc.
		
	By:	 	/s/ David Warnock
		 	 David Warnock
 Chairman of the Compensation

Committee of the Board of Directors

	
	Executive:
	
	/s/ George Bernstein
	George Bernstein


  

 2
2006-0876.

#### State v. Legg.

Hamilton App. No. C-050994. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.
§ 33.12 Apples not subject to regulation. Except as otherwise provided in this section, any person may, without regard to the provisions of this part, ship or offer for shipment, and any carrier may, without regard to the provisions of this part, transport or receive for transportation to any foreign destination: ( a ) A quantity of apples to any foreign country not exceeding a total of 5,000 pounds gross weight or 100 boxes of apples packed in standard boxes on a single conveyance:
( b ) Apples to Pacific ports west of the International Date Line which do not meet maturity standards of the grade specified in § 33.10, if the packages are conspicuously marked or printed with the words “Immature Fruit;” (in letters at least two inches high) if inspected and certified as meeting all other requirements of §§ 33.10 and 33.11.
( c ) Apples for processing which do not meet the grade standards specified in § 33.10, if such apples grade at least U.S. No. 1 as specified in U.S. Standards for Apples for Processing (§§ 51.340 to 51.344 of this chapter), and if the containers are conspicuously marked “Cannery” (in letters at least two inches high) if inspected and certified as meeting all other requirements of §§ 33.10 and 33.11.
( d ) Apples shipped to Canada in bulk containers.
[71 FR 70644, Dec. 6, 2006, as amended at 79 FR 18766, Apr. 4, 2014]
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: August 6, 2009 | By:    | /s/  Kolja Rockov                          |
|---------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |   | Kolja Rockov                                         |
|                      |   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 16, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 70014]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28842]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Member Conflict: HIV/AIDS Vaccines.
    Date: December 1-2, 2010.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Kenneth A. Roebuck, PhD Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 5106, MSC 7852, Bethesda, MD 
20892, (301) 435-1166, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#176578727562747c7c5774646539797e7f39707861"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2e5c414b4c5b4d45456e4d5d5c0040474600494158">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Neurophysiology.
    Date: December 6, 2010.
    Time: 2 p.m. to 4 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Toby Behar, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 4136, MSC 7850, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-
4433, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#482a2d20293a3c082b3b3a66262120662f273e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4e2c2b262f3c3a0e2d3d3c6020272660292138">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 9, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-28842 Filed 11-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
### Devany, 

### Dennis (OST) From: charles mitchell [cwmjvm@gmail.com]

, •"Saturday, February 13, 2010 1:58 PM To:·' ,',: /

# '.**.Sent:~·** 

### ,. , Devany, Dennis (OST) Subject: Colgan Air I**c.all.youratt~ti.o.1;}** to the excellent article inthis morning's Plattsburgh Press Republican regarding .the county's recommeridailon:iib award air service to Colgan Air. Icompletely agree with his remarks and inaddition Iwould like to add that Colgan Air's safety record is questionable at best. They have been held accountable for the deaths in the horrific plane crash outside Buffalo, ayear ago. Ourcounty legislatorsare greedy and listening to the greedier Chamber of Commerce and Idoubt if the voting public iswell informed about what is going to be "rammed down their throats." So please act responsibly and turn down their recommendation to save the pwople of Clinton County from a judgement based on faultY information. ' Thank you,

1
95-1907.

#### State v. Ballew.

Hamilton App. No. C-920576. On October 18,1996, this court stayed the execution of sentence in this cause pending disposition of a petition for writ of certiorari in the Supreme Court of the United States and exhaustion of state post-conviction remedies. Whereas the United States Supreme Court denied appellant’s petition for writ of certiorari on January 6, 1997, and this court declined jurisdiction and dismissed the appeal in case No. 98-738, appellant’s post-conviction appeal, on June 17, 1998,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that the stay of execution entered in this cause on October 18,1996, be and is hereby revoked, effective August 24,1998.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED by the court that said sentence be carried into execution by the Warden of the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility or, in his absence, by the Deputy Warden *on*Monday, the 23rd day of November 1998, in accordance with the statutes so provided.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certified copy of this entry and a warrant under the seal of this court be duly certified to the Warden of the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility and that said Warden shall made due return thereof to the Clerk of the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton County.
#### In the Matter of Richard Mullen, Petitioner, v Superintendent of Southport Correctional Facility, Respondent.

[815 NYS2d 778]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Based on an investigation into possible drug use, petitioner was asked to submit a urine sample. After the urine sample twice tested positive for the presence of cannabinoids, petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with violating the prison disciplinary rule which prohibits the unauthorized use of a controlled substance. Following a disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of the charge and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. Petitioner thereafter commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

The misbehavior report, positive test results and other supporting documentation provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt *(see Matter of Suggs v Miller,*22 AD3d 910, 910 [2005]; *Matter of Cooper v Selsky,*9 AD3d 763, 764 [2004]). We reject petitioner’s contention that he was denied relevant documentary evidence in the form of a report relating to the investigation prompting the request for urinalysis, because the record establishes that such report did not exist *(see Matter of Odome v Goord,*8 AD3d 921, 922 [2004]). In any *1245event, such information was irrelevant inasmuch as the misbehavior report and determination of guilt resulted from the two positive drug test results and not from any information obtained from the investigation leading to the request for petitioner’s urine sample *(see Matter of Hemphill v Selsky,*26 AJD3d 548, 549 [2006]; *Matter of Folk v Goord,*307 AD2d 500, 501 [2003]). Likewise, petitioner’s claim that he was denied effective employee assistance—premised as it is on the assistant’s failure to obtain the same irrelevant documentation—is without merit. Petitioner’s remaining challenge to the testing procedures is being raised now for the first time and, therefore, is not preserved for our review (see *Matter of Binns v Goord,*12 AD3d 1006, 1007 [2004]).

Mercure, J.P., Spain, Carpinello, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

MICHAEL CORKER,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 4:19cv484-AW-HTC

WALTER MCNEIL, FRANK ALLMAN, 

et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

I have considered the magistrate judge’s March 30, 2020 Report and 

Recommendation. ECF No. 15. I have also considered de novo the plaintiff’s

objections. ECF No. 16. I have determined the Report and Recommendation should 

be adopted. It is now ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 15) is adopted and 

incorporated into this order.

2. The clerk will enter a judgment that says, “This case is dismissed

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).”

3. The clerk will close the file.

SO ORDERED on April 29, 2020. 

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 4:19-cv-00484-AW-HTC Document 17 Filed 04/30/20 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Keyuan Petrochemicals, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report’), I, Aichun Li, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.
 
 
 Date:  August 16, 2010
 
 /s/ Aichun Li
 
 Aichun Li
 Chief Financial Officer
§ 3430.16 Eligibility requirements. ( a ) *General.* Program-specific eligibility requirements appear in the subpart applicable to each program and in the RFAs.
( b ) *Foreign entities* — ( 1 ) *Awards to institutions.* Unless specifically allowed, foreign commercial and non-profit institutions are not considered eligible to apply for and receive NIFA awards.
( 2 ) *Awards to individuals.* Unless otherwise specified, only United States citizens, non-citizen nationals of the United States, and lawful permanent residents of the United States are eligible to apply for and receive NIFA awards.
( c ) *Responsibility determination.* In addition to program-specific eligibility requirements, awards will be made only to responsible applicants. Specific management information relating to an applicant shall be submitted on a one-time basis, with updates on an as-needed basis, as part of the responsibility determination prior to an award being made under a specific NIFA program, if such information has not been provided previously under this or another NIFA program. NIFA will provide copies of forms recommended for use in fulfilling these requirements as part of the pre-award process. Although an applicant may be eligible based on its status as one of these entities, there are factors that may exclude an applicant from receiving Federal financial and nonfinancial assistance and benefits under a NIFA program (e.g., debarment or suspension of an individual involved or a determination that an applicant is not responsible based on submitted organizational management information).
( d ) *Certification of NLGCA status.* NIFA will make publically available (*e.g.,* Federal Register) the process through which institutions may apply for designation as a NLGCA. The public notice will, at a minimum, include NLGCA criteria, instructions on how to request designation, information about how NIFA will respond to requests, and termination of NLGCA status.
( e ) *Center of Excellence.* ( 1 ) To be considered as a center of excellence, a center of excellence must be one of the following entities that provides financial or in-kind support to the center being proposed: ( i ) State agricultural experiment stations;
( ii ) Colleges and universities;
( iii ) University research foundations;
( iv ) Other research institutions and organizations;
( v ) Federal agencies;
( vi ) National laboratories;
( vii ) Private organizations, foundations, or corporations;
( viii ) Individuals; or
( ix ) A group consisting of two or more of the entities described in paragraphs (e)(1)(i) through (viii) of this section.
( 2 ) Only standard grant and coordinated agricultural project (CAP) grant applicants may be considered for center of excellence designation.
[74 FR 45740, Sept. 4, 2009, as amended at 81 FR 6414, Feb. 8, 2016; 82 FR 21109, May 5, 2017]
§ 3201.69 Floor cleaners and protectors. ( a ) *Definition.* Cleaning solutions for either direct application or use in floor scrubbers for wood, vinyl, tile, or similar hard surface floors. Products within this item are marketed specifically for use on industrial, commercial, and/or residential flooring.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The Federal preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 77 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than July 23, 2012, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased floor cleaners and protectors. By that date, Federal agencies that have the responsibility for drafting or reviewing specifications for items to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased floor cleaners and protectors.
[76 FR 43817, July 22, 2011]
#### The State ex rel. O’Brien, Appellant, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellee.

[Cite as *State ex rel. O’Brien v. Indus. Comm.*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 385.]

(No. 97-616

Submitted August 19, 1998

Decided October 14, 1998.)

*Daniel D. Connor Co., L.P.A., Daniel D. Connor*and *Kenneth S. Hafenstein,*for appellant.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Miltina A. Gavia,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

*386Douglas, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Alice Robie Resnick, J.,

dissenting. I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and return the cause to the Industrial Commission pursuant to *State ex rel. Noll v. Indus. Comm.*(1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 203, 567 N.E.2d 245.

Douglas and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.
#### § 301.55 Restrictions on interstate movement of regulated articles.

No person may move interstate from any quarantined area any regulated article except in accordance with this subpart.[1]

###### Footnotes -
  301.55

[1] Any properly identified inspector is authorized, upon probable cause, to stop and inspect persons and means of conveyance moving in interstate commerce and to hold, seize, quarantine, treat, apply other remedial measures to, destroy, or otherwise dispose of regulated articles as provided in sections 414, 421, and 434 of the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7714, 7731, and 7754).
§ 3203.6 Restrictions. ( a ) Only an authorized USDA official may approve the transfer of excess computers or other technical equipment under this part.
( b ) Excess computers or other technical equipment may be transferred for the purpose of cannibalization, provided that the requestor submits a statement clearly indicating that cannibalization of the requested property will have greater benefit than utilization of the item in its existing form. Cannibalization is a secondary use of equipment and, therefore, these requests are considered subordinate to requests for primary use.
( c ) Designated organizations will only receive property for cannibalization when it has been specifically requested by the recipient and the cannibalized parts must only be used in computers or other technical equipment destined for eligible recipients.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lightwave Logic, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Fred Goetz, Jr., President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: August 14, 2008



/s/ Fred Goetz, Jr.

Fred Goetz, Jr., President

Lightwave Logic, Inc.