alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2005-1182.

#### Disciplinary Counsel v. Wise.

Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline, No. 04-043. Reported at 108 Ohio St.3d 381, 2006- Ohio-1194, 843 N.E.2d 1198. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Pfeifer, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.
2005-2162.

#### Bellman v. Am. Internatl. Group.

Lucas App. No. L-03-1301, 163 Ohio App.3d 540, 2005-Ohio-5250. On motion to withdraw of appellee Auto Owners Insurance. Motion granted.

Resnick, J., dissents.
§ 3550.253 Settlement of a debt by compromise or adjustment. Compromise or adjustment offers may be initiated by the debtor or by RHS. RHS will approve only those compromises and adjustments that are in the best interest of the Government. ( a ) *Compromise.* A compromise is an agreement by RHS to release a debtor from liability upon receipt of a specified lump sum that is less than the total amount due.
( b ) *Adjustments.* An adjustment is an agreement by RHS to release a debtor from liability generally upon receipt of an initial lump sum representing the maximum amount the debtor can afford to pay and periodic additional payments over a period of up to 5 years.
( c ) *Timing of offers.* ( 1 ) For a settlement offer to be considered, secured debts must be fully matured under the terms of the debt instrument or must have been accelerated by RHS.
( 2 ) Unsecured debts owed after the sale of the security property may be proposed for compromise or adjustment at any time. Debts that were never secured may be proposed for compromise or adjustment when they are due and payable.
( d ) *Retention of security property.* The debtor may retain the security property if the compromise payment is at least equal to the net recovery value, and it is in the best interest of the Government to allow the debtor to retain the security property.
# C_2021049EN.01000501.xml

| 12.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 49/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 49/5

---

Declaration of the Commission

(2021/C 49/05)

Upon the adoption of the Regulation in 2014, the Commission committed to an effective communication and exchange of views with the European Parliament and the Council on trade disputes that may lead to the adoption of measures under the Regulation, and on enforcement actions in general. Mindful of the overarching objective of effective and efficient enforcement of Union’s rights under the Union’s international trade agreements, the Commission will continue to promote and streamline its interactions with the European Parliament and the Council to the mutual benefit.

In particular, the Commission undertakes to examine, as part of its enhanced enforcement system, alleged violations of the Union’s international trade agreements when raised by the Parliament, its Members, or its Committees, or by the Council on the understanding that such requests be accompanied by supporting evidence. The Commission will keep the Parliament and the Council informed of the output of its enhanced enforcement work.

In deploying the enhanced enforcement system, the Commission will pay equal attention to alleged breaches of the trade and sustainable development provisions of EU trade agreements as to alleged breaches of market access systems. The processing of alleged breaches of trade and sustainable provisions will be fully integrated into the system. The Commission will prioritise those cases which are particularly serious in terms of their effect on workers or the environment in a trade context, which have systemic importance and which are legally sound.

The Commission will continue to fully engage in dedicated sessions with the responsible Parliamentary committee to exchange views on trade disputes and enforcement actions, including with regard to impacts on Union industries. In this context, the Commission will continue its reporting practice by providing periodically a state of play on all pending disputes and instant information for major developments in relation to disputes at the same time such information is shared with Member States. This reporting and information sharing will take place through the responsible committees in the Council and in the Parliament.

At the same time, the Commission will continue keeping the Parliament and the Council regularly informed of international developments that may lead to situations requiring the adoption of measures under the Regulation.

Finally, the Commission reaffirms its commitments under Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council to promptly transmit to the Parliament and to the Council draft implementing acts that it submits to the committee of Member States as well as final draft implementing acts following the delivery of opinions in the committee. This is managed via the comitology register.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

MATTHEW J. THOMPSON,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 4:20cv285-MW/MAF

WARDEN R. POLK,

HAMILTON C.I. ANNEX,

Defendant.

_________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING SECOND REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge’s Second 

Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 18, and has also reviewed de novo Plaintiff’s 

objections to the second report and recommendation, ECF Nos. 20 & 21. 

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted, over Plaintiff’s 

objections, as this Court’s opinion. Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, 

ECF No. 15, is DENIED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Clerk shall enter 

judgment stating, “Plaintiff’s amended complaint, ECF No. 14, is DISMISSED as 

an abuse of judicial process. All other pending motions are DENIED.” The Clerk 

Case 4:20-cv-00285-MW-MAF Document 22 Filed 12/16/20 Page 1 of 2
2

is directed to note on the docket that this case is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 

1915(g). The Clerk shall close the file. 

SO ORDERED on December 16, 2020.

s/Mark E. Walker 

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00285-MW-MAF Document 22 Filed 12/16/20 Page 2 of 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Peter Laricos, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court,. Kings County, rendered September 22, 1978, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial of a motion to suppress certain evidence. Judgment reversed, on the law, motion to suppress granted, and case remitted to Criminal Term for further proceedings. Although defendant, expressed his desire to consult with an attorney and to remain silent, the authorities failed to act on these requests. In fact, they tried to dissuade defendant from exercising these rights. This conduct is clearly inconsistent with the authorities’ obligation to "scrupulously honor” a defendant’s right to "cut off the questioning” (sée *People v*
      *653
      *Grant,*45 NY2d 366, 374). Thus, the statements made by defendant to an Assistant District Attorney should have been suppressed. Titone, J. P., Mangano, Rabin and Gibbons, JJ., concur.
Editorial Note on Part 3400
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3400 appear at 76 FR 4806, Jan. 27, 2011.

§ 3400.5 Evaluation and disposition of applications. ( a ) *Evaluation.* All proposals received from eligible applicants in accordance with eligible research problem or program areas and deadlines established in the applicable request for proposals shall be evaluated by the Director through such officers, employees, and others as the Director determines are uniquely qualified in the areas of research represented by particular projects. To assist in equitably and objectively evaluating proposals and to obtain the best possible balance of viewpoints, the Director shall solicit the advice of peer scientists, *ad hoc* reviewers, or others who are recognized specialists in the research program areas covered by the applications received and whose general roles are defined in §§ 3400.2(j) and 3400.2(k). Specific evaluations will be based upon the criteria established in subpart B § 3400.15, unless NIFA determines that different criteria are necessary for the proper evaluation of proposals in one or more specific program areas, and announces such criteria and their relative importance in the annual program solicitation. The overriding purpose of such evaluations is to provide information upon which the Director can make informed judgments in selecting proposals for ultimate support. Incomplete, unclear, or poorly organized applications will work to the detriment of applicants during the peer evaluation process. To ensure a comprehensive evaluation, all applications should be written with the care and thoroughness accorded papers for publication.
( b ) *Disposition.* On the basis of the Director's evaluation of an application in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section, the Director will ( 1 ) Approve support using currently available funds,
( 2 ) Defer support due to lack of funds or a need for further evaluations, or
( 3 ) Disapprove support for the proposed project in whole or in part.
With respect to approved projects, the Director will determine the project period (subject to extension as provided in § 3400.7(c)) during which the project may be supported. Any deferral or disapproval of an application will not preclude its reconsideration or a reapplication during subsequent fiscal years.
|                                                                                            |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Home | 	En Español | Contact Us | 	A to Z **HUD Best Practices 2000 Awards** |
#### § 301.74 Restrictions on interstate movement of regulated articles.

No person may move interstate from any quarantined area any regulated article except in accordance with this subpart.[1]

[65 FR 35264, June 2, 2000, as amended at 66 FR 21051, Apr. 27, 2001]

###### Footnotes -
  301.74

[1] Any properly identified inspector is authorized to stop and inspect persons and means of conveyance and to seize, qurantine, treat, apply other remedial measures to, destroy, or otherwise dispose of regulated articles a provided in sections 414, 421, and 434 of the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7714, 7731, and 7754).
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe accompanying Quarterly Report of Linn Energy, LLC (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the three and nine months ended September 30,2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Michael C. Linn, Chairman, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.               The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and

2.               The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: November 9,  2007 | By:    | /s/ Michael C. Linn                              |   |
|------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                         |   | Michael C. Linn                                  |
|                         |   | Chairman, President and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
§ 3.33 Required certification. Agencies referring delinquent debts to Treasury for collection via cross-servicing must certify, in writing, that: ( a ) The debts being transferred are valid and legally enforceable;
( b ) There are no legal bars to collection; and
( c ) The agency has complied with all prerequisites to a particular collection action under the laws, regulations or policies applicable to the agency, unless the agency and Treasury agree that Treasury will do so on behalf of the agency.
#### § 295.5 Program statistical reports.

Current and historical information on FNS food assistance program size, monetary outlays, geographic distribution, racial and ethnic participation rates, and other data is published throughout the year. Limited supplies are available for public distribution upon request. Write the Director, Program Information Division, Food and Nutrition Service, USDA, 3101 Park Center Drive, Alexandria, VA 22302-1500.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

JEFFREY E. STARK,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 1:19-cv-193-AW-GRJ

MARK W. MOSELEY, et al.,

Respondents.

_______________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The Court has considered the Magistrate Judge’s October 24, 2019 Report and 

Recommendation. ECF No. 7. The Court has also considered de novo the issues 

presented in Petitioner’s objection. ECF No. 9. The Court has determined that the 

report and recommendation should be accepted, and it is adopted as the order of the 

Court. The clerk shall enter a judgment stating, “This case is dismissed for lack of 

jurisdiction.” The clerk shall close the file. 

SO ORDERED on November 12, 2019. 

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

EXHIBIT 4.06    
    


SEE ADDITIONAL LEGEND ON REVERSE SIDE OF CERTIFICATE  



	NUMBER

PA-            	 	Incorporated Under the Laws

of the State of Delaware

July 17, 1996	 	SHARES

*            *




ALLOS THERAPEUTICS, INC.

SERIES A EXCHANGEABLE PREFERRED STOCK  


THIS CERTIFIES THAT                         is the record holder
of                        (            ) shares of the Series A
Exchangeable Preferred Stock of Allos Therapeutics, Inc. (the "Corporation") transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof, in person or by duly authorized attorney, upon
surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed or assigned.  


A statement of the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions granted to or imposed upon the respective classes or series of shares of stock of
the Corporation, and upon the holders thereof as established by the
Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, and the number of shares constituting each series and the designations thereof, may be obtained by any stockholder upon request and without charge at
the principal office of the Corporation.  


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers this
     day of                         , 200  .  



	

 Secretary	
 	

 President




SHARES



EACH








 

        For value Received,                        hereby sell, assign and transfer
unto                                         
                               Shares of the Preferred Stock of the within named
Corporation, represented by the within Certificate and do hereby irrevocably constitute and
appoint                                        
        Attorney to transfer the said shares of said Preferred Stock on the books of the
said Corporation, pursuant to the provisions of the By-Laws thereof, with full powers of substitution in the premises.  


        Dated                               
                 A.D. 

In Presence of:  


NOTICE: The signature to this assignment must strictly correspond with the name as written upon the face of the Certificate in every particular and
without alteration or enlargement or any change whatever.  


THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE ARE HELD BY A PERSON WHO MAY BE DEEMED TO BE AN AFFILIATE OF THE ISSUER FOR PURPOSES OF RULE 144 PROMULGATED UNDER THE
SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED. 


2











QuickLinks



EXHIBIT 4.06
Amendment to Management Services Agreement



 Exhibit 10.9.1 
  
 AMENDMENT TO 
 MANAGEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT 
  
 THIS AMENDMENT
TO MANAGEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT, dated as of March 5, 2005 (this “Amendment”), is entered into by and between FREIGHTCAR AMERICA, INC. (formerly known as Rabbit Hill Holdings, Inc.), a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”), and JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY (formerly known as John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company), a Massachusetts life insurance company (“John Hancock”). 
  
 RECITALS: 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company and John Hancock are parties to that certain Management Services Agreement, dated as of June 3, 1999
(the “Agreement”); and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company
and John Hancock desire to amend certain provisions in the Agreement relating to the termination of the Agreement, subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein. 
  
 NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
  
 1. Definitions. All capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.

  
 2. Amendment. The Agreement is hereby amended by
replacing Section 6 of the Agreement in its entirety to read as follows: 
  
 “Section 4. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by John Hancock at any time by written notice to the Company. In addition, this Agreement will terminate automatically upon the termination of John
Hancock’s right to appoint a member of the Company’s board of directors (the “Termination of Designation Right”); provided, however, that if an initial public offering of the Company’s common stock (the
“IPO”) shall have occurred prior to the Termination of Designation Right, this Agreement shall terminate automatically upon the payment of a termination fee of $50,000 to John Hancock, which amount shall be payable promptly following the
completion of the IPO. The provisions of Sections 3 and 4 shall survive any termination of this Agreement.” 
  
 3. No Further Amendments. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. Each party agrees to be bound
by all of the terms of the Agreement, as amended hereby. 
  
 4.
Miscellaneous. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.

  

			
	 FREIGHTCAR AMERICA, INC.

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Kevin P. Bagby


	 Name:
	 	Kevin P. Bagby
	 Title:
	 	Chief Financial Officer
	
	 JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Scott A. McFetridge


	 Name:
	 	Scott A. McFetridge
	 Title:
	 	Managing Director
USGS Publications Warehouse - Citation View Home

Publication Citation

Online Document Versions

View index page

View document

USGS Store

Currently unavailable through the USGS

Store.

Publication Type USGS Numbered Series

Title Selected field and analytical methods and analytical results in the Dutch

Flats area, western Nebraska, 1995-99

Author Verstraeten, I. M.; Steele, G. V.; Bohlke, J. F.; Kraemer, T. E.; Cannia, J.

C.; Hitch, D. E.; Wilson, K. E.; Carnes, A. E.

Year 2001

Series Open-File Report

Series Number 2000-413

Edition -

Language ENGLISH

Description iv, 53 p. : ill., maps ; 28 cm.

USGS Library Call

Number -

USGS Home

Contact USGS

Search USGS

Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey

URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/

Page Contact Information: Contact the Pubs Warehouse Team

Page Last modified: 10/31/2011 14:33:45

USGS Publications Warehouse http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/ofr00413

1 of 1 10/31/2011 2:34 PM
PUBLIC LAW 108–331—OCT. 16, 2004 118 STAT. 1281

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5105:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):

Sept. 29, considered and passed House.

Oct. 1, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 108–331

108th Congress

An Act

To authorize the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution to carry out

construction and related activities in support of the collaborative Very Energetic

Radiation Imaging Telescope Array System (VERITAS) project on Kitt Peak near

Tucson, Arizona.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORIZING BOARD OF REGENTS OF SMITHSONIAN

INSTITUTION TO CARRY OUT CONSTRUCTION AND

RELATED ACTIVITIES IN SUPPORT OF VERITAS ASTROPHYSICAL OBSERVATORY PROJECT.

The Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution is authorized to carry out construction and related activities in support

of the collaborative Very Energetic Radiation Imaging Telescope

Array System (VERITAS) project on Kitt Peak near Tucson,

Arizona.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

There is authorized to be appropriated $1,000,000 for fiscal

year 2005 to carry out section 1.

Approved October 16, 2004.

20 USC 50 note.

20 USC 50 note.

Oct. 16, 2004

[H.R. 5105]
#### FOWLER, Appellant, v. DURHAM, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 27, 1906.)

Action by Louise R. Fowler, executrix of George R; Fowler, against Northrup Durham.

No opinion. Motion for reargument denied.
DON YOUNG CONGRESSMAN FOR ALL ALASKA 

WASHINGTON OFFICE: 

2314 RAYBURN BUILDING 

WASHINGTON, DC 20515 

202-225-5765 

ffiongress of t~e 2£lnite~ (~Hates 

~=louse of J.i{epresentati&es 

~1asl!iugtou, gU!I. 20515 

February 18, 2015 

Mr. Kevin Schlemmer, Chief, EAS Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Mr. Schlemmer: 

COMMIITEEON 

NATURAL RESOURCES 

CHAIRMAN, SUBCOMMIITEE ON 

INDIAN AND ALASKA NATIVE AFFAIRS 

COMMIITEEON 

TRANSPORTATION & INFRASTRUCTURE 

REPUBLICAN 

POLICY COMMIITEE 

·-· ' ' 

-----·. --- ~ . -------------·--- ---- -- _- -...:::- ---- -- ~- ~-

h..l. 

._, -~ -- --===-

I am pleased to write today in support of Alaska Airlines' application to provide Essential Air 

Service to Adak, Alaska: DOCKET DOT-OST-2000-8556. 

Essential Air Service to Adak is particularly important given the community's remote location, 

midway down the Aleutian Chain. Alaska Airlines' B-737-400 "combi" jet aircraft are ideal for 

the more than three-hour, almost 1,200-mile nonstop trip from Anchorage to Adak. 

Alaska Airlines is also one of the few airlines using the state-of-the-art Required Navigation 

Procedure (RNP). ·This RNP technology, as well as the special training Alaska's Adak flight 

crews receive, should materially enhance Alaska's ability to land at Adak. These special 

measures have become quite important in light of the planned closure of Adak's crosswind 

runway. 

For the reasons stated above, Alaska Airlines is well suited to continue serving Adak through 

the Essential Air Service program. 

VISIT OUR WEBSITE 

HTTP"J/DONYOUNG.HOUSE.GOV 

4241 B STREET 

SUITE 203 

ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99503 

907-271-5978 

100 CUSHMAN STREET, SUITE 307 

P.O. Box 73110 

fAIRBANKS, ALASKA 99707 

907-456-<121 0 

612 W. WILLOUGHBY AVENUE, SUITE B 

P.O. Box 21247 

JUNEAU, ALASKA 99802 

907-586-7400 

CALL T OLL·fREE 

1-866-99(}...5979