alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 319.37-20 Restrictions on the importation of specific types of plants for planting. ( a ) *Plant type-specific restrictions.* In addition to the general restrictions in this subpart, the Administrator may impose additional restrictions on the importation of specific types of plants for planting necessary to effectively mitigate the risk of introducing quarantine pests into the United States through the importation of specific plants for planting. Additional restrictions may be placed on the importation of the entire plant or on certain plant parts. A list of the types of plants for planting whose importation is subject to additional restrictions, and the specific restrictions that apply to the importation of each type of plants for planting, may be found in the Plants for Planting Manual.
( b ) *Basis for changing restrictions.* The Administrator may determine that it is necessary to add, change, or remove restrictions on the importation of a specific type of plants for planting, based on the risk of introducing a quarantine pest through the importation of that type of plants for planting. The Administrator will make this determination based on the findings of a pest risk analysis or on other scientific evidence.
( c ) *Process for adding, changing, or removing restrictions.* Restrictions on the importation of a specific type of plants for planting beyond the general restrictions in §§ 319.37-5 through 319.37-11 will be changed through the following process: ( 1 ) *Document describing restrictions.* APHIS will publish in the Federal Register a notice that announces our proposed determination that it is necessary to add, change, or remove restrictions on the importation of a specific type of plants for planting. This notice will make available for public comment a document describing the restrictions that the Administrator has determined are necessary and how these restrictions will mitigate the risk of introducing quarantine pests into the United States.
( 2 ) *Response to comments.* APHIS will issue a second notice after the close of the public comment period on the notice described in paragraph (c)(1) of this section. This notice will inform the public of the specific restrictions, if any, that the Administrator has determined to be necessary in order to mitigate the risk of introducing quarantine pests into the United States through the importation of the type of plants for planting. In response to the public comments submitted, the Administrator may implement the restrictions described in the document made available by the initial notice, amend the restrictions in response to public comment, or determine that changes to the restrictions on the importation of the type of plants for planting are unnecessary.
( d ) *Previously imposed restrictions on specific types of plants for planting.* Types of plants for planting whose importation was subject to specific restrictions by specific regulation as of April 18, 2018, will continue to be subject to those restrictions, except as changed in accordance with the process specified in paragraph (c) of this section. The restrictions are found in the Plants for Planting Manual.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2275 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.2275

                       One Hundred Ninth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
             the third day of January, two thousand and six

                                 An Act

 
 An Act to temporarily increase the borrowing authority of the Federal 
    Emergency Management Agency for carrying out the national flood 
                           insurance program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Flood Insurance Program 
Enhanced Borrowing Authority Act of 2006''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN BORROWING AUTHORITY.

    The first sentence of subsection (a) of section 1309 of the 
National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4016(a)), as amended by 
the National Flood Insurance Program Further Enhanced Borrowing 
Authority Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-106; 119 Stat. 2288), is amended 
by striking ``$18,500,000,000'' and inserting ``$20,775,000,000''.

SEC. 3. EMERGENCY SPENDING.

    Amendments made pursuant to this Act are designated as emergency 
spending, as provided under section 402 of H. Con. Res. 95 (109th 
Congress).

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Carmine Marrone, Appellant.

— Judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, rendered March 6, 1979, affirmed. No opinion. This case is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Mangano and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2576 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2576

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend title 49, United States Code, to modify requirements relating 
 to the availability of pipeline safety regulatory documents, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AVAILABILITY OF PIPELINE SAFETY REGULATORY DOCUMENTS.

    Section 60102(p) of title 49, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``1 year'' and inserting ``3 years'';
            (2) by striking ``guidance or''; and
            (3) by striking ``, on an Internet Web site''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 16, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2576

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend title 49, United States Code, to modify requirements relating 
 to the availability of pipeline safety regulatory documents, and for 
                            other purposes.
```
Exhibit 10.12(a)

FIRST AMENDMENT
TO THE RESTATED SKYWEST, INC.
2002 DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

This First Amendment to the Restated SkyWest, Inc. 2002 Deferred Compensation Plan (the
"Plan") is adopted effective as of December 31, 2008 by SkyWest, Inc., a Utah corporation (the
"Company") as sponsor of the Plan.

WHEREAS,
the Company maintains the Plan for the benefit of its eligible employees and the eligible employees of SkyWest Airlines, Inc.; and

WHEREAS,
the Plan was amended and restated in 2007 effective January 1, 2008; and

WHEREAS,
the Company desires to further amend the Plan to clarify the ability of the Company to make Company contributions in differing amounts and rates for individual Plan
participants; and

WHEREAS,
the Company desires to amend the Plan to expand the list of officers who are authorized to execute amendments to the Plan.

NOW,
THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

1.     The
text of Section 5.1 of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and is replaced with the following:



2.     The
text of Section 10.1 of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and is replaced with the following:



3.     The
text of Section 10.2 of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and is replaced with the following:



4.     The
text of Section 10.3 of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and is replaced with the following:



---





IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this First Amendment to be executed this    day of December, 2008.

SKYWEST, INC.By:

/s/ BRADFORD R. RICHBradford R. Rich Chief Financial Officer


---
#### § 351.5 Return or destruction.

Where the plant quarantine inspector requires the entire shipment to be returned to the country of origin as a prohibited importation (in which event he shall endorse his action thereon) and delivers the shipment to the collector of customs, the collector shall in turn deliver it to the postmaster for dispatch to the country of origin. If, upon examination, the plant material is deemed dangerous to plant life, the collector of customs shall permit the plant quarantine inspector to destroy immediately both the container and its contents. In either case the plant quarantine inspector shall notify the addressee of the action taken and the reason therefor. If the objectionable plant material forms only a portion of the contents of the mail package and in the judgment of the inspector the package can safely be delivered to the addressee, after removing and destroying the objectionable material, such procedure is authorized. In the latter case the inspector shall place in the package a memorandum (Form AQI-387) informing the addressee of the action taken by the inspector and describing the matter which has been seized and destroyed and the reasons therefor.

[24 FR 9923, Dec. 9, 1959, as amended at 36 FR 24917, Dec. 24, 1971]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2310 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2310

 To repeal the requirement for 12 operational aircraft carriers within 
                               the Navy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 16, 2006

  Mr. Warner introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To repeal the requirement for 12 operational aircraft carriers within 
                               the Navy.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT FOR 12 OPERATIONAL AIRCRAFT CARRIERS 
              WITHIN THE NAVY.

    Section 5062 of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (b); and
            (2) by redesignating subsections (c) and (d) as subsections 
        (b) and (c), respectively.
                                 <all>
```
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CARLOS GUSTAVO CLAROS

RODRIGUEZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-74858

Agency No. A072-528-564

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 10, 2011** 

Before: BEEZER, TALLMAN, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.

Carlos Gustavo Claros Rodriguez, a native and citizen of El Salvador,

petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order

dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his

applications for special rule cancellation of removal under the Nicaraguan

FILED

JAN 18 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-74858

Adjustment and Central American Relief Act (“NACARA”), and for non-lawful

permanent resident cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8

U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo due process claims. Vasquez-Zavala v.

Ashcroft, 324 F.3d 1105, 1107 (9th Cir. 2003). We dismiss in part and deny in part

the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s determination that Claros

Rodriguez did not establish eligibility for NACARA relief, as that finding is based

on disputed facts. See Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility

Act of 1996, § 309(c)(5)(C)(ii); cf. Barrios v. Holder, 581 F.3d 849, 857 (9th Cir.

2009).

We also lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s determination that Claros

Rodriguez failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a

qualifying relative. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir.

2005).

Claros Rodriguez’s contentions that the IJ disregarded his evidence of

hardship and did not consider the evidence in the aggregate are not supported by

the record and do not amount to colorable constitutional claims. See

Martinez-Rosas, 424 F.3d at 930.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.
1

The Honorable Harold D. Vietor, United States District Judge for the Southern

District of Iowa.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 01-3195

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Southern District of Iowa.

*

Jorge Mireles-Torres, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: April 4, 2002

 Filed: April 9, 2002

___________

Before LOKEN, BYE, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Jorge Mireles-Torres appeals the sentence imposed by the district court1

 upon

his guilty plea to illegal reentry following deportation for an aggravated felony, in

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

738 (1967), counsel has moved to withdraw, and has filed a brief raising the issue

whether Mireles-Torres’s sentence is too harsh.
-2-

At sentencing, Mireles-Torres raised no objection to the accuracy of the

presentence report’s facts and Guidelines calculations, and the sentence imposed--

also without objection--was at the bottom of the applicable Guidelines range. His

argument on appeal is unreviewable. See 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a); cf. United States v.

Woodrum, 959 F.2d 100, 101 (8th Cir. 1992) (per curiam) (sentence is not reviewable

merely because it is at top of properly calculated Guidelines range).

Having reviewed the record independently pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488

U.S. 75 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues.

Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
LAW OFFICES OF RAYMOND P. FITZPATRICK, JR. 1200 CORPORATE DRIVE, SUITE 105

BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA 35242

October 14, 2015 Electronically and by Overnight Delivery

U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Management System West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, D.C. 20590 Re: Petition for Amendment To Exemption No. 11545 Issued To Clean Energy Renewables, LLC Pursuant To Section 333 of The FAA Reform Act, DocketNo. FAA-2015-0399 Ladies and Gentlemen: On May 11,2015, FAA granted the referenced Section 333 exemptionto conduct aerial data collectionto Clean Energy Renewables, LLC ("CER"). CERrespectfully requests an amendment to authorize the use ofadditional UAS systems.. CER seeks approval to utilize the following UAS platforms manufactured by Sky Eye Innovations: Sky Eye T-Series UAV Sky Eye A-Series UAV Sky Eye OGI UA V Sky Eye Micro UA V These UAS platforms have notbeenpreviously reviewed by FAA. Technical specifications for each ofthe listed Sky Eye products are included inthe confidential operating manual that is being filed with FAA by overnight delivery under separate cover. Also confidentially submitted is additional technical information and safetyprocedures in the format ofFAA Order 8130.34C Appendix D. To the extent not addressed inthese documents, all operations will be conducted in accord with CER's current exemption and standard Section 333 operating procedures and conditions.October 14, 2014 Page2

The gross weight ofeach ofthese units is under 10 lbs., with a maximum gross weight, including payload, ofunder 20 lbs. CERrequests that the Secretary find, inconsideration ofthe size, weight, speed and limited operating area associated with these aircraft and their operation, that the aircraft meetthe conditions ofSection 3 3 3 and relieffrom 14 CFR part 21, to the extent needed, is appropriate. CERrequests authority to utilize the Sky Eye UAS platforms listed above inthe same manner for aerial data collection and subject to all other conditions as set forth in CER's ExemptionNo. 11545. CERbelieves the requested amendment will not set any precedent orraise any new issues. We request that FAA dispense with publication ofthe summary ofthis petition in the Federal Register and grant the requested amendment on a summary basis. An amendment to ExemptionNo. 11545 to authorize use ofeach ofthe Sky Eye UAS systems listed above is respectfully requested. Yours very truly, Is/RaymondP. Fitzpatrick, Jr. Raymond P. Fitzpatrick, Jr. Attorney for Clean Energy Renewables, LLC

RPFjr/deb
<TABLE> <S> <C>

     <ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet  at  December  31, 1997 and the Statements of Income for the
Year ended December 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          11,694
<SECURITIES>                                   255,979
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,439
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,551
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 270,663
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,881
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     236,782
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   270,663
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                19,130
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,488
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    16,642
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        2.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        2.18


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2611 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2611

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the headquarters building of the Coast Guard on the campus 
   located at 2701 Martin Luther King, Jr., Avenue Southeast in the 
District of Columbia as the ``Douglas A. Munro Coast Guard Headquarters 
                  Building'', and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The headquarters building of the Coast Guard on the campus located 
at 2701 Martin Luther King, Jr., Avenue Southeast in the District of 
Columbia shall be known and designated as the ``Douglas A. Munro Coast 
Guard Headquarters Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Douglas A. Munro Coast Guard 
Headquarters Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 16, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2611

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To designate the headquarters building of the Coast Guard on the campus 
   located at 2701 Martin Luther King, Jr., Avenue Southeast in the 
District of Columbia as the ``Douglas A. Munro Coast Guard Headquarters 
                  Building'', and for other purposes.
```
§ 3430.1201 Purpose. The purpose of VSGP is to administer a competitive grant program to develop, implement, and sustain veterinary services and relieve veterinarian shortage situations (see § 3430.1202 for definition) in the U.S., which includes insular areas (see § 3430.1202 for a definition of “insular area”). A qualified entity may use funds provided by a grant awarded under this section to relieve veterinarian shortage situations and support veterinary services for any of the following purposes: ( a ) To promote recruitment (including for programs in secondary schools), placement, and retention of veterinarians, veterinary technicians, students of veterinary medicine, and students of veterinary technology.
( b ) To allow veterinary students, veterinary interns, externs, fellows, and residents, and veterinary technician students to cover expenses (other than the types of expenses described in 7 U.S.C. 3151a(c)(5)) to attend training programs in food safety or food animal medicine.
( c ) To establish or expand accredited veterinary education programs (including faculty recruitment and retention), veterinary residency and fellowship programs, or veterinary internship and externship programs carried out in coordination with accredited colleges of veterinary medicine.
( d ) To provide continuing education and extension, including veterinary telemedicine and other distance-based education, for veterinarians, veterinary technicians, and other health professionals needed to strengthen veterinary programs and enhance food safety.
( e ) To provide technical assistance for the preparation of applications submitted to the Secretary for designation as a veterinarian shortage situation under 7 U.S.C. 3151a.