alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Form 10-Q of James River Group, Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2007, I, Michael T. Oakes, Chief Financial Officer of James River Group, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

|   | (a) | such Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (b) | the information contained in such Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of James River Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of, and for, the periods presented in such Form 10-Q. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

| By:    | /s/ Michael T. Oakes    |   | Date:  April 30, 2007 |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|-----------------------|
|   | Michael T. Oakes        |   |                  |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |   |                  |
|   |                    |   |                  |
Opinion filed March 26, 2020

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals 

__________

No. 11-19-00086-CV

__________

RUSTY’S OILFIELD SERVICE CO., INC., Appellant

V.

RUGER PROPERTIES, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law

Midland County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC20894

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The parties have filed in this court a joint motion to dismiss this appeal. In 

the motion, the parties state that they “have reached an agreement to compromise 

and settle their differences in the underlying lawsuit.” The parties request that we 

dismiss this appeal and tax costs against the party incurring same. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1. 
2

The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM

March 26, 2020

Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., 

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.1

Willson, J., not participating. 

1

Jim R. Wright, Senior Chief Justice (Retired), Court of Appeals, 11th District of Texas at Eastland, 

sitting by assignment.
#     LAST LIBERTY SHIP LAUNCHED [ETC.]  

##     Video Item Preview  

# Share or Embed This Item

Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to RedditShare to TumblrShare to PinterestShare to Popcorn MakerShare via email

Advanced embedding details, examples, and help

Favorite

# Flag this item for

                  -                    Graphic Violence                 
                  -                    Explicit Sexual Content                 
                  -                    Hate Speech                 
                  -                    Misinformation/Disinformation                 
                  -                    Marketing/Phishing/Advertising                 
                  -                    Misleading/Inaccurate/Missing Metadata                 

movies

# LAST LIBERTY SHIP LAUNCHED [ETC.]

          - by
          -  National Archives and Records Administration 

            - Publication date
            -  1944 
            - Usage
            - CC0 1.0 Universal
            - Topics
            - archives.gov ,  public.resource.org
            - Language
            -  English 
            - Item Size
            -             524.2M                

## Credits

Uploaded by Public.Resource.Org

            - Addeddate
            -  2011-03-25 06:03:26 
            - Identifier
            -  gov.archives.arc.39018 

## plus-circle              Add Reviewcomment        Reviews      

write a review

1,182        Views      

7Favorites

#         DOWNLOAD OPTIONS      

download                  1 file                
                512KB MPEG4                download

download                  1 file                
                ITEM TILE                download

download                  1 file                
                MPEG2                download

download                  1 file                
                OGG VIDEO                download

download                  1 file                
                TORRENT                download

download 30 Files            download                6 Original
SHOW ALL

# IN COLLECTIONS

          FedFlix                      
          United States Government Films                      
          News & Public Affairs                      

        Uploaded by                              Public Resource                                    on March 25, 2011

# SIMILAR ITEMS (based on metadata)

Terms of Service (last updated 12/31/2014)
*Wednesday, August 19, 1998*

MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

97-1227.

#### State ex rel. McFarland v. Indus. Comm.

Franklin App. No. 96APD07-880. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS

HANDDOWN LIST OF JULY 21, 2015

WESTERN DISTRICT

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b)

AND ISSUED PER CURIAM

------------------------------------------------------------------

WD77532 Orlando Omar Cruz vs. State of Missouri

WD77849 Joshua M. Edmond vs. State of Missouri

WD77878 Ronald E. Brown vs. State of Missouri

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b)

AND ISSUED PER CURIAM

------------------------------------------------------------------

WD77338 State of Missouri vs. Jeffery Clinton Ford
#### § 3801.5 Appeals.

Any person whose request is denied shall have the right to appeal such denial. Appeals shall be in accordance with § 1.6(e) of this title and addressed to the Chairperson, World Agricultural Outlook Board, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC 20250.
#### In re WILCOX, Justice of the Peace.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

September 26, 1906.)

In the matter of the application to remove William P. WIl- *1150cox, a justice of the peace of the town of Sal-i, Onondaga county.

No opinion. Application denied, without costs to either party.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2053

MICHELLE L. STEFANICK,

Petitioner,

v.

U.S. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Merit Systems

Protection Board. (DC-1221-14-0959-W-1)

Submitted: February 29, 2016 Decided: March 17, 2016

Before KING, AGEE, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michelle L. Stefanick, Petitioner Pro Se. Bryan G. Polisuk,

General Counsel, Jeffrey Gauger, Office of the General Counsel, 

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Washington, D.C., for 

Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM: 

Michelle L. Stefanick seeks review of the Merit Systems 

Protection Board’s order dismissing as untimely her 

whistleblower retaliation appeal. Our review of the record 

reveals that the MSPB did not err in concluding that Stefanick’s 

appeal was untimely filed and that equitable tolling was not 

warranted. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the 

reasons stated by the MSPB. Stefanick v. Dep’t of State, No. 

DC-1221-14-0959-W-1 (M.S.P.B. July 31, 2015). 

We grant the Department of State’s motion to amend the 

caption, leaving the MSPB as the sole respondent. See 5 U.S.C. 

§ 7703(a)(2) (2012). We deny Stefanick’s pending motions. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ALAN GOLDFARB, P.A.

, Appellant,

v.

FLOYD BROWN, as Personal Representative of the Estate of CAROLE N.

BROWN

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 3741

[ September 19, 2019 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County ; Susan R. Lubitz , Judge; L.T. Case No. 502016CA008514

.

Joel S. Perwin of Joel S. Perwin, P.A., Miami, for appellant.

Joseph P. Discepola of Freedland Harwin Valori, PLLC, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

C ONNER

, K LINGENSMITH and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### Dean Tarry Corp., Respondent, v Stanley L. Friedlander et al., Constituting the Planning Board of the Village of Tarrytown, Appellants.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Planning Board of the Village of Tarrytown disapproving petitioner’s application for site plan approval, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated March 31, 1980, which granted the petition, vacated and set aside the determination of the planning board and deemed the site plan to have been approved. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, proceeding dismissed, and matter remitted to the Planning Board of the Village of Tarrytown to make findings of fact in support of its determination. Petitioner initiated this article 78 proceeding to review and annul the decision of the planning board that, by a 3 to 2 vote, disapproved its site development plan for the construction of a six-story apartment building. Unfortunately the board failed to render findings, a prerequisite to a review of its determination. Therefore, the instant matter is remitted to the planning board to make the findings of fact which underlie its determination. Mollen, P. J., Lazer, Cohalan and Margett, JJ., concur. [103 Misc 2d 435.]
Case 3:20-cv-04698-TKW-HTC Document 1-2 Filed 03/11/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:20-cv-04698-TKW-HTC Document 1-2 Filed 03/11/20 Page 2 of 2
#### Dorothy Telaro, Respondent-Appellant, v. Rudolph Telaro, Appellant-Respondent.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated February 23, 1966, modified, on the law and the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, by reducing the sum awarded to plaintiff for the support of herself and the infant issue of the marriage to $200 per week, to be allocated $150 for plaintiff and $25 for each child. As so modified, judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. Appeal from decision of said court dated February 15, 1966 dismissed, without costs. In our opinion, the support and maintenance awarded to plaintiff was excessive to the extent indicated. No separate appeal lies from a decision. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2346 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2346

   To amend the Ojito Wilderness Act to make a technical correction.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 1, 2006

 Mr. Bingaman (for himself and Mr. Domenici) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Ojito Wilderness Act to make a technical correction.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OJITO WILDERNESS MAP.

    Section 2(1) of the Ojito Wilderness Act (16 U.S.C. 1132 note; 
Public Law 109-94) is amended by striking ``October 1, 2004'' and 
inserting ``January 24, 2006''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6605
CHARLES H. TRAMMELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DONALD R. GUILLORY, Former Warden; L. W. COLLINS, Hearing Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-98-199-AM) Submitted: July 30, 1998 Decided: August 26, 1998 Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles H. Trammell, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Charles H. Trammell appeals from the district court’s orderdenying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Trammell v. Guillory , No. CA-98- 199-AM (E.D. Va. Mar. 20, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Child Passenger Safety

A PARENT’S PRIMER

GROWING

UP SAFE: 

It’s a four-step

process.

As children grow,

how they sit in

your car, truck or

SUV should

change. Save your

child from injury

or death by

observing all 

four steps:

1

2

3

4

REAR-FACING

INFANT SEATS 

FORWARDFACING

TODDLER SEATS 

BOOSTER

SEATS

SAFETY BELTS

in the back seat from age one

and 20 pounds to about age four

and 40 pounds 

TODDLER

INFANT

BOOSTER

SAFETY BELT

in the back seat from birth to at

least one year old and at least

20 pounds

in the back seat from about 

age four to at least age eight,

unless 4’9” 

in the back seat at age eight or

older or taller than 4’9”.

REMEMBER: All children age 12 and under should ride in the back seat. 
Get Help!

ON THE WEB

Go to www.nhtsa.dot.gov and choose

Child Passenger Safety from the menu

or click on the child safety seat logo.

The site includes child safety seat

installation tips, product ratings, recalls,

and other useful information.

NEAR YOU

A certified child passenger safety

technician can check your installation

and answer questions. To find a

technician or an inspection station near

you, go to www.nhtsa.dot.gov, click 

on the child safety seat logo, and 

then click on Child Safety Seat

Inspections or go to

www.seatcheck.org. 

BY PHONE

For more information about child

safety seats, booster seats,

inspection/fitting stations in

your area, safety belts, air bags,

and other highway safety issues,

call the DOT Auto Safety Hotline

at 1-888-DASH-2-DOT 

(1-888-327-4236).
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsEffects of Wing Sweep on In-flight Boundary-layer Transition for a Laminar Flow Wing at Mach Numbers from 0.60 to 0.79The variable sweep transition flight experiment (VSTFE) was conducted on an F-14A variable sweep wing fighter to examine the effect of wing sweep on natural boundary layer transition. Nearly full span upper surface gloves, extending to 60 percent chord, were attached to the F-14 aircraft's wings. The results are presented of the glove 2 flight tests. Glove 2 had an airfoil shape designed for natural laminar flow at a wing sweep of 20 deg. Sample pressure distributions and transition locations are presented with the complete results tabulated in a database. Data were obtained at wing sweeps of 15, 20, 25, 30, and 35 deg, at Mach numbers ranging from 0.60 to 0.79, and at altitudes ranging from 10,000 to 35,000 ft. Results show that a substantial amount of laminar flow was maintained at all the wing sweeps evaluated. The maximum transition Reynolds number obtained was 18.6 x 10(exp 6) at 15 deg of wing sweep, Mach 0.75, and at an altitude of 10,000 ft.Document ID19910015242Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsAnderson, Bianca Trujillo*(NASA Hugh L. Dryden Flight Research Facility Edwards, CA, United States)*Meyer, Robert R., Jr.*(NASA Hugh L. Dryden Flight Research Facility Edwards, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1990Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberH-1565NAS 1.15:101701NASA-TM-101701Accession Number91N24555Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-60-4XDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910015242.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 28.3 Director.

The Director shall perform for and under the supervision of the Secretary and the Administrator, such duties as the Secretary or the Administrator may require in enforcing the provisions of the Act and the regulations issued thereunder.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of TWC Holding LLC (the “Company”) for the quarterly periodended July 1, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael M. Thompson, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.     The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.     The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:   August 15, 2006 |   |                                   |
|------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|                         |   |                                   |
|                         |   |                                   |
|                         | By:    | /s/ Michael M. Thompson                |   |
|                         |   | Michael  M. Thompson                   |
|                         |   | President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

 

----
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 50361 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
PROCOPIO RAMIREZ

- ISQUIERDO , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:14

- CR

- 690

- 1

Before REAVLEY , ELROD , and HAYNES , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent P rocopio Ramirez

- Isquierdo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ramirez

- Isquierdo h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 20 , 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-50361 Document: 00513472912 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2016No. 15

- 50361

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for lea ve to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 15-50361 Document: 00513472912 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/20/2016
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21-1


                           THE NAVIGATORS GROUP, INC.
                                AND SUBSIDIARIES



SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT AT DECEMBER 31, 1997:


                                                           JURISDICTION IN
NAME                                                       WHICH ORGANIZED
----                                                       ---------------

Navigators Insurance Company                                   New York
NIC Insurance Company                                          New York
Somerset Marine, Inc.                                          New York
Somerset of Georgia, Inc.                                      Georgia
Somerset Insurance Services of Texas, Inc.                     Texas
Somerset Insurance Services of California, Inc.                California
Somerset Insurance Services of Washington, Inc.                Washington
Somerset Marine Aviation Property Managers, Inc.               New Jersey
Somerset Asia Pacific Pty Limited                              Sydney, Australia
Somerset Marine (UK) Limited                                   London, UK
Navigators Corporate Underwriters, Ltd.                        London, UK
Navigators Holdings (UK) Limited                               London, UK
Somerset Services Pte. Ltd.                                    Singapore
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Alliance Financial Corporation (the
Company) for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, J. Daniel Mohr, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 13, 2009



| |  |                    |  |                                       |  | 
| |  | ------------------ |  | ------------------------------------- |  | 
| |  | /s/ J. Daniel Mohr |  |                                      
| |  | Name:              |  | J. Daniel Mohr                        |  | 
| |  | Title:             |  | Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |  | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.