alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 3201.128 Exterior paints and coatings. ( a ) *Definition.* Exterior paints and coatings are pigmented liquid products that typically contain pigments to add color and are formulated for use on outdoor surfaces. When these products dry, they typically form a protective layer and provide a coat of color to the applied surface. This category includes paint and primers but excludes wood and concrete sealers and stains and specialty coatings such as roof coatings, wastewater system coatings, and water tank coatings.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The Federal preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 83 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than July 6, 2020, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased exterior paints and coatings. By that date, Federal agencies responsible for drafting or reviewing specifications for products to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased exterior paints and coatings.
( d ) *Determining overlap with a designated product category in the EPA's CPG program.* Qualifying products within this product category may overlap with the EPA's CPG-designated recovered content product category of Construction Products: Consolidated and Reprocessed Latex Paint for Specified Uses. USDA is requesting that manufacturers of these qualifying biobased products provide information on the BioPreferred Program's website about the intended uses of the product, information on whether the product contains any recovered material, in addition to biobased ingredients, and performance standards against which the product has been tested. This information will assist Federal agencies in determining whether a qualifying biobased product overlaps with the EPA's CPG-designated product category of Construction Products: Consolidated and Reprocessed Latex Paint for Specified Uses and which product should be afforded the preference in purchasing.
Note 1 to Paragraph ( d
):
Exterior paints and coatings within this designated product category can compete with similar exterior paints and coatings with recycled content. Under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, section 6002, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency CPG-designated Construction Products: Consolidated and Reprocessed Latex Paint for Specified Uses containing recovered materials as products for which Federal agencies must give preference in their purchasing programs. The designation can be found in the Comprehensive Procurement Guideline, 40 CFR 247.12.
[84 FR 32021, July 5, 2019]
#### Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, Appellant, v Robert L. Bowles, Individually and as Executor of Esther Bowles, Deceased, et al., Respondents.

Order unanimously reversed, with costs, and motion for stay of arbitration granted. Memorandum: This case raises issues concerning the application of New York or Arizona insurance limits; whether the uninsured motorist endorsements of the policies permit double coverage; which insurer is primary and which is liable as an excess insurer; whether subdivision 8 of section 167 of the Insurance Law is only applicable to accidents within the State and, if not, whether the delay involved precludes the denial of coverage; and whether payments made properly have exhausted coverage. These are issues of law for the court to decide. The arbitration clause in the standard uninsured motorist endorsement, which the policies contained, does not cover all controversies between the insured and the insurer. Only the issues of fault and damages, if fault is established, are the subjects of arbitration *(Matter of Rosenbaum [American Sur. Co. of N. Y.],*11 NY2d 310). Consequently, Special Term erred in denying petitioner’s application to stay arbitration. (Appeal from order of Monroe Supreme Court — arbitration.) Present — Cardamone, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Callahan and Moule, JJ.
#### DERBY, Respondent, v. DEGNON-McLEAN CONTRACTING CO., Appellant (two cases).

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 15, 1906.)

Actions by Minnie L. Derby and Orville P. Derby against the Degnon-McLean Contracting Company.

No opinion. Motion to resettle orders granted.
#### A. G. A. Realty Corp. v. Beatrice Adler, as Administratrix.

Motion to dismiss appeal denied, with $10 costs. Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Steuer, Tilzer and McGivern, JJ.
#### LEVEY v. LEVEY.

(Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.

June, 1914.)

Divorce (§ 101*) — Separation — Counterclaim — Annulment — Grounds —Physical Incapacity—Statutes.

Code Civ. Proc. § 1770, authorizing counterclaims in matrimonial actions, confines the right of counterclaim to a counterclaim for a divorce or a separation; and hence, in an action by a wife for separation, a defendant may not interpose a counterclaim to annul the marriage on the ground of his own physical incapacity.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Divorce, Cent Dig. §§ 322-327; Dec. Dig. § 101.*]

Action by Warrena Dodge Levey against Clarence D. Levey. On demurrer to counterclaim.

Sustained.

*418Francis P. Burns, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Abraham C. Cohen, of New York City, for defendant.

GIEGERICH, J.

The defendant in an action for a separation has interposed a counterclaim to annul his marriage to the plaintiff on the ground of his own physical incapacity. Such a counterclaim cannot be asserted. Section 1770 of the Code of Civil Procedure, relative to counterclaims in matrimonial actions, confines the right of counterclaim to counterclaims for a divorce or a separation, and by implication excludes a counterclaim- to annul a marriage. Durham v. Durham, 99 App. Div. 450, 91 N. Y. Supp. 295; Taylor v. Taylor, 25 Misc. Rep. 568, 55 N. Y. Supp. 1052.

Demurrer sustained, with costs.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 227 (Friday, November 26, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 72825]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29711]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Reissuance

    Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation 
Intermediary licenses have been reissued by the Federal Maritime 
Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 
U.S.C. Chapter 409) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to 
the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             License No.                             Name/Address                         Date reissued
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4481F................................   JFJ Freight Forwarders Inc., 13100 NW.  September 9, 2010.
                                        113th Avenue Road, Medley, FL 33178.
019779N..............................  Francisca Envios Inc., 1749 NW. 21st     October 16, 2010.
                                        Terrance, Miami, FL 33142.
020178N..............................  LCL Shipping USA, Inc., dba Cargo        October 15, 2010.
                                        Planet Logistics, 625 West Victoria
                                        Street, Compton, CA 90220.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Sandra L. Kusumoto,
Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.
[FR Doc. 2010-29711 Filed 11-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

PAUL DONOVAN WALDE,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:20-cv-12-AW-GRJ

OFFICER JOSHUA MEURER,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

I have considered the magistrate judge’s January 7, 2021 Report and 

Recommendation, ECF No. 28, to which there have been no objections. I agree with 

the magistrate judge that the case should be dismissed. It appears Plaintiff has 

abandoned his claims. 

The Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated into this order. 

The clerk will enter a judgment that says “This case is dismissed without prejudice 

for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the court’s order.” The clerk will 

then close the file. 

SO ORDERED on February 6, 2021. 

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-00012-AW-GRJ Document 29 Filed 02/06/21 Page 1 of 1
§ 201.75 Interagency certification. Interagency certification may be accomplished by participation of more than one official certifying agency in performing the services required to certify a lot of seed. ( a ) The certifying agency issuing labels for all classes of certified seed shall require the seed on which the labels are used to meet standards at least equal to the minimum genetic standards for the seed in question as specified in Table 5 of this part.
( b ) Seed to be recognized for interagency certification must be received in containers carrying official certification labels, or if shipped for processing, evidence of its eligibility from another official certifying agency, together with the following information: ( 1 ) Variety and kind;
( 2 ) Quantity of seed (pounds or bushels);
( 3 ) Class of certified seed;
( 4 ) Inspection or lot number traceable to the previous certifying agency's records.
( c ) Each label used in interagency certification shall be serially numbered or carry the certification identity number and clearly identify the certifying agencies involved, the variety, and the kind and class of seed. The seed lot number or other identification number, the kind, and variety name shall appear on the official label and/or directly on the container in a position to be viewed in conjunction with the official certification label.
[38 FR 25662, Sept. 14, 1973; 38 FR 26800, Sept. 26, 1973, as amended at 65 FR 1710, Jan. 11, 2000; 76 FR 31795, June 2, 2011; 85 FR 40583, July 7, 2020]
#### § 29.9261 Procedure to be followed.

In certifications based on permissive inspection of nonquota tobacco produced in a state where any quota tobacco is produced, the inspector shall use the Official Standard Grades for all types of quota tobacco. The inspector shall determine by inspecting each lot in the crop-lot whether the crop-lot can be certified as the nonquota tobacco requested by the applicant. If the inspector determines upon inspection that any individual *lot* in the crop-lot meets the specifications of any grade of any quota tobacco, no certificate will be issued on any tobacco in the crop-lot.
<PAGE>

                                                                February 7, 2000

Condev Land Growth Fund '86, Ltd.
1999 Annual Report

Dear Limited Partner:

Enclosed is your Schedule K-1 (Form 1065) relating to the Partnership's
operations for the year ended December 31, 1999. If your investment is held by a
custodian, the K-1 is for information purposes only. A copy of this form has
been sent to your custodian.

The financial statements of the Partnership for the year ending December 31,
1999 are on the reverse side hereof. There was one property sale during the
year. On December 29, 1999, West 50 Joint Venture, in which the Partnership
holds a 59% interest, sold its property on West SR 50 in Lake County. On January
6, 2000 a total of $1,665,000, or $222 per unit, was distributed to limited
partners. Details of the sale were included in the January 6 Distribution
Report. As of December 31, 1999, the net asset value (book value) per unit of
limited partner interest was $269.24, which included the $222 per unit
distributed on January 6, 2000. As of that date, the Partnership owned one
remaining property:

NASA Causeway, Titusville. This property continues to be under contract with an
-------------------------
investor who is developing the site for retail users. The buyer has made a
$30,000 non-refundable deposit on the contract, and is paying the Partnership a
non-refundable monthly extension fee. The buyer has obtained most of the permits
required to develop the property, and we anticipate closing on this property
near the end of February, 2000.

If the property does close as expected, all liabilities of the Partnership will
be paid and a final distribution to limited partners will be made shortly
thereafter. The Partnership will then be terminated.

Please feel free to contact the Investor Relations office if you have any
questions or would like additional information concerning your investment.

Sincerely yours,

CONDEV ASSOCIATES

                                      29
# CI2021380EN.01000401.xml

| 20.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 380/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 380/4

---

Statement by the European Commission on a geopolitical dialogue with the European Parliament on the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA III)

(2021/C 380 I/04)

The European Commission, mindful of the European Parliament’s functions of political control laid down in Article 14 of the Treaty on the European Union, commits to conduct a high-level geopolitical dialogue between the two institutions on the implementation of Regulation (EU) 2021/1529 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance (IPA III). This dialogue should allow exchanges with the European Parliament, whose positions on the implementation of the IPA III will be fully taken into consideration, in full respect of the Commission’s ability to implement the instrument, in line with its institutional responsibilities.

The geopolitical dialogue will discuss general orientations on the implementation of the IPA III, including on programming before the adoption of the IPA III programming framework and programming documents, and concerning specific subjects such as the suspension of assistance to a beneficiary when it persistently fails to observe the principles of democracy, the rule of law, good governance, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms.

The geopolitical dialogue will be structured as follows:

| i) | A high-level dialogue between the Commissioner in charge of Neighbourhood and Enlargement, on behalf of the Commission, and the European Parliament. |
| --- | --- |

i)

A high-level dialogue between the Commissioner in charge of Neighbourhood and Enlargement, on behalf of the Commission, and the European Parliament.

| ii) | A permanent dialogue at senior officials’ level with AFET working groups to ensure an adequate preparation and follow-up to the high-level dialogue. |
| --- | --- |

ii)

A permanent dialogue at senior officials’ level with AFET working groups to ensure an adequate preparation and follow-up to the high-level dialogue.

The high-level dialogue will take place at least twice a year. One of the meetings may coincide with the presentation by the Commission of the draft annual budget.

---
#### In the Matter of Avon Morris, Petitioner, v John A. Dillon, as a Judge of the County Court of Erie County, et al., Respondents.

Petition unanimously denied, without costs. (CPLR art 78.) Present—Simons, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Doerr and Moule, JJ.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. 4:94cr4044-WS

KIRK DOUGLAS HARRIS, 4:06cv7-WS

Defendant.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 257)

docketed February 27, 2006. The magistrate judge recommends that the defendant's 

motion pursuant to Rule 60(b) be summarily denied. The defendant has filed objections

(doc. 261) to the report and recommendation.

Upon review of the record in light of the defendant’s objections, the court has

determined that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation must be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 257) is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order of the court.

Case 4:94-cr-04044-WS-WCS Document 265 Filed 03/31/06 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 4:94cr4044-WS

2. The defendant’s Rule 60(b) motion (doc. 248) is hereby summarily DENIED. 

3. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and shall close Case No. 4:06cv7-

WS.

DONE AND ORDERED this March 31, 2006.

 /s William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:94-cr-04044-WS-WCS Document 265 Filed 03/31/06 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENSACOLA DIVISION 

CONNIE LEVASSUER, 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. Case No. 3:20cv5552/RV/HTC 

SHADES INLET INC., 

 Defendant. 

 / 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

 UPON consideration of the parties’ joint motion to approve settlement 

and joint stipulation of dismissal (doc. 15), it is ORDERED: 

 (1) The Settlement Agreement is hereby APPROVED. I find the 

terms to be fair and adequate under the facts of this case. This cause is 

DISMISSED, with prejudice and without taxation of costs. 

 (2) In the event settlement is not consummated for any reason, the 

Court reserves the power, upon motion filed by any party within 60 days 

after date, to amend, alter or vacate and set aside this order of dismissal. 

 DONE AND ORDERED this 4th day of May, 2020. 

 /s/ Roger Vinson 

 ROGER VINSON 

 Senior United States District Judge

Case 3:20-cv-05552-RV-HTC Document 16 Filed 05/04/21 Page 1 of 1
#### § 3555.254 Final payments.

Lenders may release security instruments only after payment for the satisfaction of the full debt, including any recapture, has been received and verified.

[81 FR 6429, Feb. 8, 2016]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Froilan Rodriguez, Also Known as Froilan Rodriquez, Also Known as Frank Rodriguez, Also Known as Frank Rodriquez, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered September 20, 1977 convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of manslaughter in the first degree and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment with a maximum of six years, unanimously modified, on the law, to reduce the maximum to five years and, except, as thus modified, affirmed. During the plea taking colloquy, defendant was promised a sentence with a maximum of five years. Thereafter, and before accepting the plea, however, the court stated that the promised sentence was not permitted by law and that, accordingly, the maximum would have to be six years. Defendant accepted this modification of the court’s promise. In fact, the range of maximum sentences for manslaughter in the first degree in effect at the time of the commission of the crime was 3 to 25 years. (Penal Law, § 70.00.) Since the increased sentence was predicated solely upon a misinterpretation of the law, the People, with commendable fairness, have consented to a reduction of the maximum from 6 to 5 years. We modify accordingly. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Bims, Fein, Sandler and Sullivan, JJ.
##### 



Exhibit 10.60 FIRST AMENDMENT TO
SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE (this Amendment), dated as of January 26,
2005, is entered into between Health Holdings & Botanicals, LLC (the Lender), and
NATURADE, INC., a Delaware corporation (the Borrower). RECITALS A. The Borrower and the Lender have entered into a SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE dated as of August 16,
2004, (the Loan Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein have the meanings given to
them in the Loan Agreement unless otherwise specified. B. The Borrower has requested that the Lender amend the payment provisions of the Loan Agreement. AMENDMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants herein contained, and
for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows: 4. Amendments to Loan Agreement.  a.
    Effective January 26, 2005 payments on the Loan Agreement will be
amended as follows:  i.
    On or before December 31, 2005 Borrower will
pay principal of $200,000 plus accrued interestii.
    No cash interest will be paid until principal
is paid in full.iii.
    Interest will be compounded on a quarterly
basis. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have entered into this Amendment as of the date first above
written.
 Naturade, Inc. /s/Stephen M. Kasprisin
Stephen M. Kasprisin
Chief Operating Officer Health Holdings & Botanicals, LLC /s/ Lionel Boissiere
By: Lionel Boissiere
Its: General Partner
§ 31.401 Cost of samples for wool grades. ( a ) *Complete set:* $22 each, delivered to any destination within the United States and $24 each, delivered to any destination outside the United States.
( b ) *Individual sample:* $2 each, delivered to any destination within the United States and $2.50 each, delivered to any destination outside the United States.
*Monday, October 12, 1998*

MOTION DOCKET

94-1538.

#### State v. Bies.

Hamilton App. No. C-920841. Upon consideration of the motion filed by counsel for appellant to continue stay of execution in the above-styled cause pending the exhaustion of state post-conviction remedies, and it appearing from the exhibits to the motion that a petition for post-conviction relief has been filed by appellant with the Hamilton County Common Pleas Court,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that said motion be, and the same is hereby, granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that execution of sentence be, and the same is hereby, stayed, pending the exhaustion of all proceedings for post-conviction relief before courts of this state, including any appeals.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for the appellant and for the appellee shall notify this court when all proceedings for post-conviction relief before courts of this state have been exhausted.