alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>52


                FORM OF PRESS RELEASE DATED AS OF AUGUST 8, 1997


    Walnut Equipment Leasing Co., Inc. and Equipment Leasing Corporation of 
America filed a Petition for Reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy 
Code, in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of 
Pennsylvania.

    Application has been made to jointly administer the two matters.  Walnut 
Equipment Leasing Co., Inc. and Equipment Leasing Corporation of America are 
engaged in the leasing of equipment and have been in business since 1969.

    Management indicated that the filing of the Chapter 11 is an attempt to 
protect the interests of the debenture holders and other creditors.  It is 
anticipated that a successful plan of reorganization will be completed with the 
cooperation of debenture holders.

    Management indicated that with the protection that the Bankruptcy Code 
offers the companies will remain viable business entities and will be seeking a 
"fresh start" after a successful reorganization.

    Management has indicated that business will be conducted in the usual 
manner and, of course, subject to the Bankruptcy Court Supervision.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2622 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2622

To provide for the application of sections 552, 552a, and 552b of title 
     5, United States Code (commonly referred to as the Freedom of 
    Information Act and the Privacy Act), and the Federal Advisory 
 Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) to the Smithsonian Institution, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 8, 2013

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for the application of sections 552, 552a, and 552b of title 
     5, United States Code (commonly referred to as the Freedom of 
    Information Act and the Privacy Act), and the Federal Advisory 
 Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) to the Smithsonian Institution, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Open and Transparent Smithsonian Act 
of 2013''.

SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF OPEN GOVERNMENT STATUTES TO THE SMITHSONIAN 
              INSTITUTION.

    (a) In General.--The following provisions shall apply to the 
Smithsonian Institution:
            (1) Section 552 of title 5, United States Code (commonly 
        referred to as the Freedom of Information Act).
            (2) Sections 552a of title 5, United States Code (commonly 
        referred to as the Privacy Act).
            (3) Sections 552b of title 5, United States Code (relating 
        to open meetings).
            (4) The Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.).
    (b) Agency.--For purposes of each provision of law under subsection 
(b)--
            (1) the Smithsonian Institution shall be an agency; and
            (2) the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institution shall be 
        the head of the agency.
    (c) Effective Date and Application.--
            (1) Effective date.--This section shall take effect on the 
        date of enactment of this Act.
            (2) Application.--This section shall apply to--
                    (A) all actions taken by the Board of Regents of 
                the Smithsonian Institution or any officer or employee 
                of the Smithsonian Institution before, on, or after the 
                date of enactment of this Act;
                    (B) any record created before, on, or after that 
                date; and
                    (C) any meeting held before, on, or after that 
                date.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Keyuan Petrochemiclas, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report’), I, Chunfeng Tao, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)T he information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.
 
 
 Date:  November 1, 2011
 
 /s/ Chunfeng Tao
 Chunfeng Tao
 Chief Executive Officer & Chairman
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

KEVIN VALENTIN,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D15-3804

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed June 2, 2017

Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Orange County,

Jenifer M. Davis, Judge.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and 

Susan A. Fagan, Assistant Public Defender, 

Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Rebecca Rock 

McGuigan, Assistant Attorney General, 

Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Kevin Valentin’s sentence. See Young v. State, 42 Fla. L. Weekly D1103 

(Fla. 5th DCA May 12, 2017); St. Val v. State, 174 So. 3d 447 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015). 

However, on remand, as the State properly concedes, Valentin shall be awarded twenty 

days of additional jail credit.
2

AFFIRMED and REMANDED FOR CORRECTION OF SENTENCE.

COHEN, C.J., ORFINGER and BERGER, JJ., concur.
#### § 3560.750 OMB control number.

The information collection requirements contained in this regulation have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and have been assigned OMB control number 0575-0189. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to vary from 15 minutes to 18 hours per response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. A person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
----

----

Fox Petroleum Inc. 10-Q

|   | (1)    | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2011, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

| Date: January 13, 2012 | By:    | /s/ James Renfro                                                       |   |
|------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                   |   | James Renfro                                                           |   |
|                   |   | Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Fox Petroleum Inc. |   |
|                   |   |                                                                   |   |

----
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

ex rel. RAYME M. EDLER M.D.,

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No: 3:20cv5503-RV/HTC

ESCAMBIA COUNTY,

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

ORDER

The plaintiff/relator, Dr. Rayme M. Edler, brought this Qui Tam action against

the defendant, Escambia County, alleging violations of the federal False Claim Act

(FCA). According to the allegations in the complaint—which at this stage of the case

I must accept as true—the plaintiff was employed as Medical Director for Escambia

County, and she was subjected to “retaliation, intimidation, and harassment” after she

complained to Florida’s Department of Health that Escambia County was knowingly

filing claims for reimbursement under Medicare and other governmental programs for

medical services performed by unlicensed and unqualified personnel.1

The defendant has filed a motion to dismiss the complaint (doc. 20). It argues

that the complaint is an improper “shotgun pleading;” certain of the claims should be

dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; the claims fail to satisfy the requisite

particularity standard of Rule 9(b); and the plaintiff has failed to properly state a claim

1

The complaint alleges (and it has been reported in the media) that the plaintiff’s complaints

directly led to the arrest of several individuals, at least one of whom has already pleaded no contest.

Case 3:20-cv-05503-RV-HTC Document 26 Filed 08/12/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

for retaliation. For all the reasons stated in plaintiff’s comprehensive and compelling

response in opposition (doc. 22), the defendant’s arguments are unpersuasive and will

be rejected. The plaintiff has, in short, plausibly stated a claim for relief.

Accordingly, the defendant’s motion to dismiss (doc. 20) is DENIED. 

DONE and ORDERED this 12th day of August, 2021

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

Senior United States District Judge

Case 3:20-cv-05503-RV-HTC Document 26 Filed 08/12/21 Page 2 of 2
```

[108th Congress Public Law 372]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ372.108]

[[Page 118 STAT. 1754]]

Public Law 108-372
108th Congress

                                 An Act

 
      To reauthorize the State Justice Institute. <<NOTE: Oct. 25, 
                         2004 -  [H.R. 2714]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: State Justice 
Institute Reauthorization Act of 2004. 42 USC 10701 note.>> 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``State Justice Institute 
Reauthorization Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 215 of the State Justice Institute Act of 1984 (42 U.S.C. 
                  10713) is amended to read as follows:

    ``Sec. 215. There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out the 
purposes of this title, $7,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2005, 2006, 
2007, and 2008. Amounts appropriated for each such year are to remain 
available until expended.''.

SEC. 3. TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.

    (a) Status of Institute.--Section 205(c) of the State Justice 
Institute Act of 1984 (42 U.S.C. 10704(c)) is amended by adding at the 
end the following new paragraph:
    ``(3) The Institute may purchase goods and services from the General 
Services Administration in order to carry out its functions.''.
    (b) Status as Officers and Employees of the United States.--Section 
205(d)(2) of the State Justice Institute Act of 1984 (42 U.S.C. 
10704(d)(2)) is amended by inserting ``, notwithstanding section 8914 of 
such title'' after ``(relating to health insurance)''.
    (c) Meetings.--Section 204(j) of the State Justice Institute Act of 
1984 (42 U.S.C. 10703(j)) is amended by inserting ``(on any occasion on 
which that committee has been delegated the authority to act on behalf 
of the Board)'' after ``executive committee of the Board''.

[[Page 118 STAT. 1755]]

SEC. 4. LAW ENFORCEMENT ARMOR VESTS.

    Section 1001(a)(23) of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 
Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3793(a)(23)) is amended by striking 
``2004'' and inserting ``2007''.

    Approved October 25, 2004.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2714:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 108-285 (Comm. on the Judiciary).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):
            Mar. 10, considered and passed House.
            Sept. 30, considered and passed Senate, amended.
            Oct. 8, House concurred in Senate amendment.

                                  <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 10.59 FIRST AMENDMENT TO
SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE (this Amendment), dated as of January 26,
2005, is entered into between Health Holdings & Botanicals, LLC (the Lender), and
NATURADE, INC., a Delaware corporation (the Borrower). RECITALS A. The Borrower and the Lender have entered into a SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE dated as of May 3, 2004,
(the Loan Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein have the meanings given to them in
the Loan Agreement unless otherwise specified. B. The Borrower has requested that the Lender amend the payment provisions of the Loan Agreement. AMENDMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants herein contained, and
for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows: 3. Amendments to Loan Agreement.  a.
    Effective January 26, 2005 payments on the Loan Agreement will be
amended as follows:  i.
    On or before December 31, 2005 Borrower will
pay principal of $75,000 plus accrued interestii.
    No cash interest will be paid until principal
is paid in full.iii.
    Interest will be compounded on a quarterly
basis. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have entered into this Amendment as of the date first above
written.
 Naturade, Inc. /s/Stephen M. Kasprisin
Stephen M. Kasprisin
Chief Operating Officer Health Holdings & Botanicals, LLC /s/ Lionel Boissiere
By: Lionel Boissiere
Its: General Partner
#### §§ 3565.258-3565.299 [Reserved]
# OAR Box 1878

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



# Document

Number: 

# 80 ) 11-1- 9 Docket Number: 

# A-90-1 9

Printed 11/28/20081:21:24 PM Sheet 80of 145 p. 1

# A-90-1 9 I I I 1 0 

# Hawley 's Condensed

Chemical Dictionary

ELEVENTH

EDITION Revised by 

## N . Irvin g Sa

x and Richard J

. Lewis , Sr

. 

# ®tfg7 .i n

WBf b o protecte d by Popyri ^ La

w(TTtJ e 1 7 U.S . Code

) 

## VA N NOSTRAN D REINHOL D COMPAN Y N«wYor k I M s materia ! ma

y be r 

# ^ftwrtgwu,(na.i/u. ita 

# * RADIA N LIBRAR Y

RESEARC H TRIANGL E PARK . M CCopyrigh t© 1987 by V u Nostran d Reinhol d Company Inc . Librar y o f Congres s Catalo g Card Number : 86-2333 3 ISBN : 0-442-28097- 1 Al l right s reserved . Certai n portion s o f thi s workcopyrigh t© 1930 , 1920 , 191 9 b y Th e Chemical Catalo g Co. , Inc . tn d 1981 , 1977 , 1971 , 1966 , 1956 , 195 0 by Van Nottran d Reinhol d Company Inc . N o pu to f thi s workcovere d b

y th e copyrigh thereo n may b e reproduce d o ruse d i n in y for m o rb y any means—graphic , electronic , o r m«-h.mr. i includin g photocopying , recording , taping , o rinformatio n storag e an d retrieval systems

—withou tpermissio n o f th e publisher . Printe d i n th e Unite d State s o f Americ a Van Nostran d Reinbol d Company Inc . U S Fifth Avenu e Ne w York . Ne w Yor k1000 3 Va n Nostran d Reinhol d Compan y Limite d Moll y Millar s Lan e Wokingham . Berkshire RGl l 2PY , Englan d Va n Nostran d Reinhol d 48 0 Latrob e Stree t Melbourne , Victori a3000 , Australi a Macmilla n o f

Canad a Divisio n o f

Canad aPublishin g Corporatio n 164 Commande rBoulevar d Agincourt , Ontari o MI S 3C7 , Canad a 1 5 1 4 1 3 1 2 1 1 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2

Uhnryo f Ctatoajlat-t>P*Mkat1e « Dat a ^"nifntiTr J rhfUK^ I dictionary . Hawley' s condense d chemica l dictionary . Rev . ed . of

: Th e Condense d chemica l dictionary . 10t h edVrev . by Ocssne rG . Hawley , 1981 . 1. Chemistry—Dictionaries . I . Hawley , Geune r Goodrich , 1905 - II . Sax , N . Irvin g (Newto n Irving ) II L Lewis . Richar d J. . Sr . IV . Title . QD5.C 5 1987 540\3'2 1 86-2333 3 ISB N 0-442-28097. 1
#### The State ex rel. Sovel, Appellant, *v.*Price Inland Terminal Company; Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellee.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Sovel v. Price Inland Terminal Co.*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 138.]

(No. 96-2638

Submitted July 15, 1998

Decided September 16, 1998.)

*Barkan & Neff, L.P.A.,*and *Robert E. DeRose,*for appellant.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Craigg E. Gould,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
#### § 331.4 [Reserved]
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Dynatem, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ending
May 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Annual Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



|                       |  |                                       
|---------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|Dated: August 25, 2006 |  |                                       
|                       | 
|                       |  | /s/ Michael Horan                     
|                       |  | Michael Horan, Chief Executive Officer
|                       | 
|                       |  | /s/ Belen Ramos                       
|                       |  | Belen Ramos, Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 10.10


        SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS WITH NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS
                             AS OF FEBRUARY 28, 2005


     The following summarizes the current compensation and benefits received by
the Company's non-employee directors as of February 28, 2005. This document is
intended to be a summary of existing oral, at will arrangements, and in no way
is intended to provide any additional rights to any non-employee director.

Retainer

     Non-employee directors each receive an annual retainer fee of $16,000.  The
Chairman of the Audit Committee receives an annual retainer of $12,000 and the
chairman of each of the Compensation Committee, Corporate Governance/Nominating
Committee and Diversity Committee receives an annual retainer of $4,000.  A
director that chairs more than one committee receives a retainer with respect to
each Committee he chairs.  All of the retainers are paid on a quarterly basis.


Meeting Fees

      Per meeting fees for non-employee directors are as follows:

-     For meetings of the Board of Directors, Compensation Committee, Corporate
      Governance/Nominating Committee and Diversity Committee, $1,000.

-     For meetings of the Audit Committee, $2,000.  In addition, the Chairman
      gets an additional $1,000 for preparing to conduct each quarterly meeting.

Equity Compensation

     Under the terms of the Company's 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, directors are
eligible to receive stock options, stock awards, and other types of equity-based
compensation awards.  However, the Company does not make any such awards to
non-employee directors under its current compensation practices.

     All non-employee directors are entitled to reimbursement of expenses for
all services as a director, including committee participation or special
assignments.
98-1949.

#### State ex rel. Mortemore v. Tretter.

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relator’s application for dismissal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Antonio Bultron, Also Known as Knowledge Born, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered May 13, 1977, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial ordered. Defendant was charged with the crime of murder in the second degree (felony murder). Although defendant testified at trial that he was guilty of the crime charged, his pretrial confession, which was introduced into evidence, potentially set forth the affirmative defense to felony murder contained in subdivision 3 of section 125.25 of the Penal Law. A factual question was presented for the jury’s determination. Under these circumstances, the erroneous charge to the jury that the application of the affirmative defense was discretionary constituted reversible error (see *People v Santanella,*63 AD2d 744; *People v Vinniane,*70 AD2d 956). We have considered defendant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. O’Connor, J. P., Mangano, Rabin and Gibbons, JJ., concur.