alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 319.37-10 Growing media. ( a ) Any plants for planting at the time of importation or offer for importation into the United States shall be free of sand, soil, earth, and other growing media, except as provided in paragraph (b), (c), or (d) of this section.
( b ) ( 1 ) Plants for planting from Canada may be imported in any growing medium, except as restricted in the Plants for Planting Manual. Restrictions on growing media for specific types of plants for planting imported from Canada will be added, changed, or removed in accordance with § 319.37-20.
( 2 ) Plants for planting from an area of Canada regulated by the national plant protection organization of Canada for a soil-borne plant pest may only be imported in an approved growing medium if the phytosanitary certificate accompanying it contains an additional declaration that the plant was grown in a manner to prevent infestation by that soil-borne plant pest.
( c ) Certain types of plants for planting growing solely in certain growing media listed in the Plants for Planting Manual may be imported established in such growing media. The Administrator has determined that the importation of the specified types of plants for planting in these growing media does not pose a risk of introducing quarantine pests into the United States. If the Administrator determines that a new growing medium may be added to the list of growing media in which imported plants for planting may be established, or that a growing medium currently listed for such purposes is no longer suitable for establishment of imported plants for planting, APHIS will publish in the Federal Register a notice that announces our proposed determination and requests comment on the change. After the close of the comment period, APHIS will publish another notice informing the public of the Administrator's decision on the change to the list of growing media in which imported types of plants for planting may be established.
( d ) Certain types of plants for planting, as listed in the Plants for Planting Manual, may be imported when they are established in a growing medium approved by the Administrator and they are produced in accordance with additional requirements specified in the Plants for Planting Manual. Changes to the list of plants for planting that may be imported in growing media, and to the requirements for the importation of those types of plants for planting, will be made in accordance with § 319.37-20.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control numbers 0579-0190, 0579-0439, 0579-0454, 0579-0458, and 0579-0463) [83 FR 11856, Mar. 19, 2018, as amended at 84 FR 29958, June 25, 2019]
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Each of
the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Sino Gas
International Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1)
 The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q Amendment No. 2 for the
fiscal period ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Date:
December 29, 2008





/s/
      Yuchuan LiuYuchuan
      LiuChief
      Executive Officer/s/
      Yugang ZhangYugang
      ZhangChief
      Financial Officer
§ 3555.104 Loan terms. ( a ) *Interest rate.* The loan must be written at an interest rate that: ( 1 ) Is fixed over the term of the loan;
( 2 ) Shall be negotiated between the lender and the borrower to allow the borrower to obtain the best available rate in compliance with all applicable laws.
( 3 ) If the interest rate increases between the time of the issuance of the conditional commitment and the loan closing, the lender will submit appropriate documentation and underwriting analysis to confirm that the applicant is still eligible.
( 4 ) The warehouse lender may charge an interest rate for interim construction financing that exceeds the underlying promissory note rate. After construction ends, the interest rate must revert to a rate that is no higher than the underlying promissory note rate. The Agency reserves the right to establish a maximum amount for the interim construction financing interest rate in the handbook, as necessary to further program goals and protect the best interests of the government.
( b ) *Repayment period.* The term of the loan may not exceed 30 years. Adjustable rate mortgages, balloon term mortgages or mortgages requiring prepayment penalties are ineligible terms.
( c ) *Repayment schedule.* Amortized payments will be due and payable monthly.
( d ) *Negative amortization.* The loan note must not provide for interest on interest.
[78 FR 73941, Dec. 9, 2013, as amended at 81 FR 6428, Feb. 8, 2016; 84 FR 35006, July 22, 2019]
#### § 319.8-14 Mexican cotton and covers not otherwise enterable.

Mexican cotton and covers not enterable under § 319.8-11, § 319.8-12, or § 319.8-13 may be entered in accordance with §§ 319.8-6 through 319.8-10 and §§ 319.8-16 through 319.8-20 insofar as said sections are applicable.
ACTIO N 

lO-llOl 13-007 

CONTROL NO 

ICICLE 

January 12,2011 

•S-.rj^ . 

-f-' 

The Honorable Ray LaHood — '-~d3~p 

Secretary n 55^-*^;? 

U.S. Dept. of Transportation zzi^ ^ 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. ~^ 5:2r~n 

Washington. D.C. 20590 ^ CO 

Re: Continuation of Alaska Airlines' Essential Air Service to Cordova, Gustavus, Petersburg, Wrangell, 

and Yalcutat, Docket OST-1998-4899 

Dear Secretary LaHood, 

I am writing in support of the continuation of Alaska Airlines' essential air service to Petersburg, Alaska. 

As the lai^est employer and air freight customer in Petersburg, we are critically aware of the continued 

need for the jet service Alaska Airlines has provided to our community for well over thirty years. 

Seafood is the economic engine of our community. Moving products to markets, transporting employees 

and connecting fishermen with needed parts is crucial to die economic well being of our company and 

community as it allows us to be competitive with other ports. Alaska Airlines provides service that 

allows us to easily cotmect with other flights throughout Alaska and to the other 49 states. Their 

investment in navigation technology has resulted in improved reliability during inclement weather. 

Reducing flight diversions and cancellations helps Petersburg's businesses and passengers. The 737-400 

"combi** aircraft used by Alaska Airlines allows for passenger, mail, freight and cargo service that is very 

dependable, A non-jet carrier would simply be unable to provide tliis same level of service. 

We respectfully encourage you to continue Alaska Airline's essential air service in Southeast Alaska. 

Thank you for your consideration. 

Sincerely, 

Kris Norosz 

Government Affairs 

cc: Ms. Susan Kurland, Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs 

Mr. Dennis DeVany. Chief, EAS and Domestic Analysis 

The Honorable Sean Parnell, Governor, State of Alaska 

Marc A. Luiken, Commissioner, Alaska State Department of Transportation and Public Facilities 

PETERSBURG FISHERIES 

A DIVISION OF ICICLE SEAFOODS, INC. 

P.O. Box 1147 • Petersburg, AK 99833 • Tel: 907-7724294 • Fax: 907-7724472
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

KAWANA BROWN,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 4:19-cv-504-AW-MJF

WARDEN, F.C.I. TALLAHASSEE, and 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF 

JUSTICE,

Respondents.

_______________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The Court has considered the magistrate judge’s January 29, 2020 Report and 

Recommendation. ECF No. 5. No objections have been filed. I have determined the 

Report and Recommendation should be adopted. It is now ORDERED: 

1. The Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted as the Court’s 

order. 

2. The Clerk shall enter a judgment saying: “This case is dismissed without 

prejudice for failure to comply with two court orders and for failure to pay the filing 

fee.” 

3. The Clerk shall close the file. 

SO ORDERED on March 5, 2020. 

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge
-

Docket No. F/\1\ - Dircc10rah.: ldcntilicr: -A D 

{I \'Oiflllakl! cllllll.(!.c!S ICJ 1/w \'tJ!Iw ,, in lhl! lahll! IJ,•!oll·. \'fl /1 11111.'1 emlln' !he It II liis llflllalt' t/C'<'ording/1'. If 

they .!ono/. t li<"k ror ·1 a/IJ inw ontllltl'lltJIII '!I 1/w cftall.!!.t'd cell. 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g .. aircnil1. engine. 

(e.g .. Inspection. propeller. appliance) 

Work-hours Lahor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost O (labor + u.s. for U.S. Fleet u 1111/ inc:lutle oncmuluion co.\/,, hen• access. testing. C@S8S1l1 parts) Registered 

and cllb c-up) \lUI') -· Prudncts 

DciCJ'lll i m: i r 

nctuator SfN on 

airplane is 1.0 so 26 

applicable to SB 

Rl'movc and 

replace actuator per I 0.0 $ 17,334 26 

Sl3 

Rcmo\·c and 

rc..:placc..: jackscrew 

and /\cmc nut I 0.0 s 17.334 735 

~.·very I 800 Oight 

homs 

I 

' 

l 

I 

The known number of products in compliance: 0 

Total Cost!:> of compliance for U.S. tkct: S I 3.840,::!34 

Cost:. covered under warranty (i(kumm) s 

On-Comlitiun Custs: ~ 
(~.g .• lnspL:ction. (

(@1$85/hour) 

rL:placement) testing. and closeup) 

Special conside rations fot· Eccmomic Analysis fUse tllis.fidt! to cxpla111 anythinK in tile Estimated C(Jsts tabl<' 

that u•os as.wmcd ur mt~llf nut he uhl'illll.\. Tllis.field nm alsu he used fO explain lrarNmf.v cost.1): 

For the lir~t proposed action. ''arranty cvv..:ragc ..:xpired six months from the last day of the month 

the SB '' :1~ issued. ;\ licr this datl·. the owner/operator assumed rcsponsibil ity for compliance cost. 

h is assumed that the m<~ority or these actuat~)rs lul\·e aln:ady been overhauled. We don't know 

that all 26 actuators arc in the US lkct. 

For the second proposed action (remove and replace Acme mtt and jackscrew at every 1800 llight 

hours/overhaul). owners/operators should not incur any additional cost. GE claims they are 

already n.·placing the /\cmc nuts and jackscrews at every overhaul. so the cost or parts and labor 

should already be included in the overhaul price. 

F. xecutivc O nl c r 128Mi: 

Could the AD be considered a ·'signilicant rcgu lntory action'"?. 

YES* 0 NO (8} 

,.. Explan;ll io n: 

DOT H.c~ulator y Policies a nd Pm ccdun•s: 

Is the AD significant? ~ 

YES* 0 NO~ 

*E:-;planation: 

c~ ul y Flc:\ih ility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant CCOil~>lllic impact 0 11 a substantial lllllllUCf or small entities? Explain for 

either a Y cs or No answer. @ 

YES 0 N0(8} 

Expla natiun: 

Inlr:tslate Avi:ttion in Alaslw: 

Thi ~ AD C()ll ld a !Ti.:ct intra al~ :wiatinn in Alaska. Is it appropriate In include sp~c ifi c requirements ror 

aircrafl op~.:ra cd in Alaska where aviat ion might b~.: the only mode of transportation? e 

YEs•O NO~ 

*Explanation:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2583 

To reauthorize the matching grant program for school security in the 

Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 28, 2013 

Mr. BARROW of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the matching grant program for school security in the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets 

Act of 1968. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MATCHING GRANT PROGRAM FOR SCHOOL SE4 CURITY. 

5 Part AA of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and 

6 Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3797a et seq.) is 

7 amended— 

8 (1) in section 2701— 

9 (A) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘and 

10 other deterrent measures’’ and inserting ‘‘, 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2583 IH

1 other deterrent measures, and emergency notifi2 cation and response technologies’’; and 

3 (B) in subsection (b)— 

4 (i) by redesignating paragraph (5) as 

5 paragraph (6); and 

6 (ii) by inserting after paragraph (4) 

7 the following: 

8 ‘‘(5) Acquisition and installation of technology 

9 for expedited notification of local law enforcement 

10 during an emergency.’’; and 

11 (2) in section 2705, by striking ‘‘2001 through 

12 2009’’ and inserting ‘‘2014 through 2018’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### § 356.8 Return procedure.

If, at the conclusion of proceedings, seized property is to be returned to the person determined to be the owner or agent thereof, the Deputy Administrator shall issue a letter or other document to the person determined to be owner or agent thereof authorizing its return. This letter shall be delivered personally or sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, and shall identify the person determined to be the owner or agent, the seized property, and if appropriate, the bailee of the seized property. It shall also provide that upon presentation of the letter or other document and proper identification, and the signing of a receipt provided by Plant Protection and Quarantine, the seized property is authorized to be released.
EXHIBIT 32 

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to 

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 

as Adopted Pursuant to 

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BlackRock Capital Investment Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2022 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), James E. Keenan, as Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Chip Holladay, as Interim Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of operations of the Company. 

 

|                             |                                               |
|-----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                        |                                          |
| /s/ James E. Keenan

  |
| Name:                       | James E. Keenan                               |
| Title:                      | Interim Chief Executive Officer               |
| Date:                       | August 3, 2022                                |
|                        |
| /s/ Chip Holladay

    |
| Name:                       | Chip Holladay                                 |
| Title:                      | Interim Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
| Date:                       | August 3, 2022                                |
#### § 29.2621 Rule 5.

The grade assigned to any lot of tobacco shall be a true representation of the tobacco at the time of inspection and certification. If, at any time, it is found that a lot of tobacco does not comply with the specifications of the grade previously assigned it shall not thereafter be represented as such grade.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-07-14T20:14:28-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
# L_2021087EN.01004601.xml

| 15.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 87/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 87/46

---

COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2021/449

of 12 March 2021

repealing Decision 2011/172/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 21 March 2011, the Council adopted Decision 2011/172/CFSP (1) concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 21 March 2011, the Council adopted Decision 2011/172/CFSP (1) concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt.

| (2) | Decision 2011/172/CFSP provides for the freezing of funds and economic resources of certain persons having been identified as responsible for the misappropriation of Egyptian State funds, and of natural or legal persons, entities or bodies associated with them. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Decision 2011/172/CFSP provides for the freezing of funds and economic resources of certain persons having been identified as responsible for the misappropriation of Egyptian State funds, and of natural or legal persons, entities or bodies associated with them.

| (3) | Following a review of Decision 2011/172/CFSP carried out pursuant to Article 5 thereof, the restrictive measures in place should be lifted. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Following a review of Decision 2011/172/CFSP carried out pursuant to Article 5 thereof, the restrictive measures in place should be lifted.

| (4) | Decision 2011/172/CFSP should therefore be repealed, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Decision 2011/172/CFSP should therefore be repealed,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Decision 2011/172/CFSP is hereby repealed.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 12 March 2021.

For the Council

The President

A. P. ZACARIAS

---

(1)  Council Decision 2011/172/CFSP of 21 March 2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt (OJ L 76, 22.3.2011, p. 63).

1

---
*Friday, October 16, 1998*

MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

98-1980.

#### State v. Arnold.

Greene App. No. 91-CA-43. Appellant has filed a notice of appeal of the judgment entered September 10, 1998, by the Greene County Court of Appeals in case No. 91-CA-43. According to appellant’s notice of appeal, he has filed a discretionary appeal and a claimed appeal of right. Under S.CtPrac.R. II(2)(A)(1), if an appeal is a claimed appeal of right or a discretionary appeal, the appellant shall also file a memorandum in support of jurisdiction at the time the notice of appeal is filed. Whereas appellant has failed to file a memorandum in support of jurisdiction as required by S.CtPrac.R. II(2)(A)(1).

IT IS ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that this case be, and hereby is, dismissed.
#### The People of the State of Illinois, defendant in error, v. Harry A. Johnson et al., plaintiffs in error.

Gen. No. 37,193.

Opinion filed November 19, 1934.

Kirkland, Fleming, Green & Martin, for plaintiffs in error Harry A. Johnson et al. Dwight McKay, for plaintiff in error Eugene G. Quinn. Joseph Lustfield, for plaintiff in error Frank Wargoslce; Weymouth Kirkland, Howard Ellis, Jay Fred Reeve and J. B. Martineau, Jr., of counsel. Thomas J. Courtney, 'State’s Attorney, for defendant in error; Edward E. Wilson, J. Albert Woll and Henry E. Seyfarth, Assistant State’s Attorneys, of counsel.

Mr. Justice MeSurely

delivered the opinion of the court. .
Exhibit 3.1 (b)

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                     OF THE
                AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                          THE LESLIE FAY COMPANY, INC.


It is hereby certified that:

                  1.  The  name  of  the  corporation  (hereinafter  called  the
"Corporation") is THE LESLIE FAY COMPANY, INC.

                  2. The Amended and Restated  Certificate of  Incorporation  of
the Corporation is hereby amended as follows:

                  (a)  Section  (A)  of  Article  IV is  hereby  deleted  in its
entirety and the following new Section (A) is hereby substituted in its place:

                           " (A) Authorized Stock. The total number of shares of
         stock which the  Corporation  shall have  authority  to issue is twenty
         million  five  hundred  thousand  (20,500,000),  consisting  of  twenty
         million  (20,000,000)  shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share
         ("Common  Stock"),  and  five  hundred  thousand  (500,000)  shares  of
         preferred stock, par value $.01 per share ("Preferred Stock")."

                  (b) Article VI is hereby deleted in its entirety.

                  3. The  amendments to the Amended and Restated  Certificate of
Incorporation  herein  certified  have been duly adopted in accordance  with the
provisions of Section 242 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.

Signed on July 17, 1998.

                                               /s/ John J. Pomerantz  
                                               ---------------------------------
                                                   John J. Pomerantz
                                                   Chief Executive Officer

Attest:



 /s/ Warren T. Wishart 
----------------------------               
     Warren T. Wishart
     Secretary
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-10-0000126 29-AUG-2014 08:19 AM
#### § 301.48-3 Notification of designation, and termination of designation, of regulated airports.

Upon designating, or terminating the designation of, an airport as regulated, the inspector shall give written notice to the official in charge of the airport that the airport has been designated as a regulated airport or that the designation has been terminated. The inspector shall also give the same information in writing to the official at the airport in charge of each airline or the operator of any other aircraft, which will move a regulated article to any State designated in § 301.48(b). The Administrator shall also give the same information to the State Plant Regulatory Official of each State designated in § 301.48(b) to which any regulated article will move.

[44 FR 24035, Apr. 24, 1979, as amended at 61 FR 32640, June 25, 1996]
#### § 29.6039 Stem rot.

The deterioration of an uncured or frozen stem resulting from bacterial action. Although stem rot results from bacterial action, it is inactive in cured tobacco and is treated as a kind of injury in these types. (See Rule 14.)
§ 3200.3 Definitions. ( a ) *1890 Land grant institutions* —any college or university eligible to receive funds under the Act of August 30, 1890 (7 U.S.C. 321 et. seq.), including Tuskegee University.
( b ) *1994 Land grant institutions* —any of the tribal colleges or universities as defined in section 532 of the Equity in Educational Land-Grant Status Act of 1994 (7 U.S.C. 301 note).
( c ) *Hispanic-serving institutions* —institutions of higher education as defined in section 316(b) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1059c (b)).
( d ) *Property management officer* —is an authorized USDA or institution official responsible for property management.
( e ) *Screener* —is an individual designated by an eligible institution and authorized by the General Services Administration (GSA) to visit property sites for the purpose of inspecting personal property intended for use by the institution.
( f ) *Excess personal property* —is any personal property under the control of a Federal agency that is no longer needed.
( g ) *Cannibalization* —is the dismantling of equipment for parts to repair or enhance other equipment.