alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JOANNE JENKINS and

QUENTON WOODEN,

Plaintiffs,

vs. CASE NO.: 4:03cv208-SPM/AK

OFFICER CHUCK PERRY,

Defendant.

_________________________/

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE

AND MOTION TO ACCEPT TRIAL BRIEF OUT OF TIME

Pending before the Court are Defendants’ request for judicial notice (doc.

84) and Plaintiffs’ consented motion to accept trial brief out of time (doc. 121). 

Upon consideration, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that both motions (docs. 84 and 121) are

granted.

DONE AND ORDERED this 2nd day of August, 2006.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 4:03-cv-00208-SPM-AK Document 170 Filed 08/02/06 Page 1 of 1
#### State Bank of West Pullman, defendant in error, v. John J. Piech, plaintiff in error.

Gen. No. 37,019.

Opinion filed October 24, 1934.

Novak, Turek & Vogel, for plaintiff in error. Mayer, Meyer, Austrian & Platt, for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice Hall

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### § 35.2 Person.

*Person* means an individual, partnership, association, corporation, or any other business unit.
# L_2020353EN.01000101.xml

| 23.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 353/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 353/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2020/1538

of 16 October 2020

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Pampepato di Terni’/‘Panpepato di Terni’ (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Pampepato di Terni’/‘Panpepato di Terni’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Pampepato di Terni’/‘Panpepato di Terni’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Pampepato di Terni’/‘Panpepato di Terni’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Pampepato di Terni’/‘Panpepato di Terni’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Pampepato di Terni’/‘Panpepato di Terni’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 2.3. – bread, pastry, cakes, confectionery, biscuits and other baker’s wares, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 October 2020.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 217, 1.7.2020, p. 33.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Last Updated: Monday, October 18, 2004Quick Draw Publication 
 	The Quick Draw Publication is produced quarterly to inform the Division of Payment Management's (DPM's) 	user community, both grant recipients and federal agencies, of all things DPM related.

 	July 2003 		 		 		+ NEW DIRECTOR 		+ NEW MEMBERS 		+ M-YEAR RUNNING OUT OF TIME  		+ PASSWORD RESETS 		+ PSC DOWNLOAD FEATURE 		+ TRAINING CD

 	July 2002 		 		+ NANCY WEIGER 		 		+ SF 1199A FAQs 		 		+ ELCTRONIC PSC 272 DOWNLOAD/UPLOAD 		 		+ HELP WANTED 		 		+ TRAINING CD 		 		+ QUERYING THE PAYMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 		 		+ AUDIT FINDINGS 		 		+ SHARPSHOOT'N! JULY 2002
  PSC Home |HHS Home | Questions? | Contact Us | Site Map | Accessibility | Privacy PolicyFreedom of Information Act | Disclaimers |       The White House | FirstGovU.S. Department of Health & Human Services  200 Independence Avenue, S.W. • Washington, D.C. 20201   |
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-24-00245-CR

JOHN CREE A/K/A JOHN MICHAEL CREE

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

462nd District Court of Denton County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F21-2451-462

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

June 27, 2024
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

SAMANTHA MAY MURPHY,

1 § 

§ No. 8, 2023

Respondent Below, Appellant, §

§ Court Below - Family Court

v. § of the State of Delaware

§

DYLAN MURPHY, § File No. CS22-04421

§ Petition No. 22-05889

Petitioner Below, Appellee, § 

§

and §

§

DONALD W. KRAVITZ and DAWN J. § File No. CS22-04760

KRAVITZ, § Petition No. 22-11838

§

Petitioners Below, Appellees. §

 Submitted: July 21, 2023

 Decided: August 29, 2023

Before TRAYNOR, LeGROW, and GRIFFITHS, Justices.

ORDER

After careful consideration of the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal, we 

conclude that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of the Family 

Court’s order dated January 4, 2023. The Family Court appropriately considered the 

best-interest factors set forth in 13 Del. C. § 722 in light of the evidence presented

and acted within its broad discretion when deciding the custody and residential 

1 The Court previously assigned pseudonyms to the parties under Supreme Court Rule 7(d).
2

arrangements for the children.

2

 “Factual findings will not be disturbed on appeal 

unless they are clearly erroneous,” and [w]hen the determination of facts turns on a 

question of the credibility and the acceptance or rejection of the testimony of 

witnesses appearing before the trier of fact, we will not substitute our opinion for 

that of the trier of fact.”

3

 As to the appellant’s contention that the Family Court 

erroneously prevented her from presenting evidence, the record reflects that the 

Family Court gave the appellant significant latitude in presenting her case,4 and we 

discern no abuse of discretion in the Family Court’s evidentiary rulings.5

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Family 

Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Abigail M. LeGrow

Justice 

2

See Russell v. Stevens, 2007 WL 3215667, at *2 (Del. Nov. 1, 2007) (affirming Family Court’s 

award of primary residential placement and stating that when the Family Court appropriately 

considers and weighs each of the best interest factors, the “law vests wide discretion in the trial 

court to determine where custody shall be placed”).

3

Shimel v. Shimel, 2019 WL 2142066, at *2 (Del. May 14, 2019).

4

See generally Damiani v. Gill, 2015 WL 4351507, at *1 (Del. July 14, 2015) (observing that selfrepresented litigants “are afforded some leniency in presenting their cases”).

5

See Swanson v. Davis, 2013 WL 3155827, at *4 (Del. June 20, 2013) (stating that the standard 

of review for a trial court’s evidentiary rulings is abuse of discretion).
§ 247.27 Financial management. ( a ) *What are the Federal requirements for State and local agencies with regard to financial management?* State and local public agencies, as well as nonprofit organizations, must maintain a financial management system that complies with the Federal regulations contained in 2 CFR part 200, subparts D and E, and USDA implementing regulations 2 CFR parts 400 and 415. The State agency's financial management system must provide accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial status of the program, including an accounting of all program funds received and expended each fiscal year. The State agency must ensure that local agencies develop and implement a financial management system that allows them to meet Federal requirements.
( b ) *What are some of the major components of the State agency's financial management system?* In addition to other requirements, the State agency's financial management system must provide for: ( 1 ) Prompt and accurate payment of allowable costs;
( 2 ) Timely disbursement of funds to local agencies;
( 3 ) Timely and appropriate resolution of claims and audit findings; and
( 4 ) Maintenance of records identifying the receipt and use of administrative funds, funds recovered as a result of claims actions, program income (as defined under § 247.25(e)), and property and other assets procured with program funds.
[70 FR 47063, Aug. 11, 2005, as amended at 83 FR 14174, Apr. 3, 2018]
EXHIBIT 31.2


CERTIFICATION


I, John F. Passalaqua, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Dolce Ventures Inc.;


2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;


3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;


4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and  I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:


a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;


b) evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures  as of a date  within  90  days  prior  to the  filing  date  of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and


c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on our  evaluation  as of the
Evaluation Date;


5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's   board  of  directors  (or  persons   performing   the  equivalent
functions):


a) all significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which  could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability  to record,  process,
summarize and report  financial data and have  identified  for the  registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and


b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and


6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and I have  indicated  in this
quarterly  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: June 24, 2005

                                         /s/ John F. Passalaqua______________
                                         John F. Passalaqua, Secretary/Treasurer
98-1551.

#### State ex rel. Wilmington v. Powell.

In Prohibition. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
MOTION DOCKET

97- 1013.

#### State ex rel. Toledo Blade Co. v. Hancock Cty. Bd. of Commrs.

In Mandamus. On bill and documentation in support of request for attorney fees. Attorney fees granted in the amount of $5,628 plus costs of $140.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                            MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                      3,643,266
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  22,265
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            3,974,546
<PP&E>                                        116,724
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,546)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              4,297,522
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         739,441
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       12,541
<OTHER-SE>                                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                4,297,522
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    0
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            1,832,156
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                173
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,742,192)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,742,992)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0



</TABLE>
2005-1357.

#### Campbell v. TES Franchising, LLC.

Butler App. No. CA200A-06-151, 2005-Ohio-2271. This cause is pending before the court on the certification of a conflict by the Court of Appeals for Butler County. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal is granted. Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO.: 4:03cr69-SPM

MARCUS NEAL MANNING,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

NOTICE OF INTENT TO REDUCE SENTENCE

Review of the record in this case reveals that the defendant, Marcus Neal

Manning, is entitled to a sentence reduction based on a 2007 guideline

amendment that lowers the guideline sentencing range for certain categories of

offenses involving crack cocaine. U.S.S.G. Amend. 706. Amendment 706 was

made retroactive, effective March 3, 2008.

Manning was sentenced in 2004 to a term of 151 months. Manning’s

guideline range at the time of sentencing was 151 to 188 months, based on a

total offense level of 34. Under the recent retroactive amendment, Manning’s

guideline range is 121 to 151 months, based on a total offense level of 32.

As authorized under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), the court intends to enter an

order reducing Manning’s sentence to 121 months. Should there be objections

to this proposed action by the court, those objections must be filed by March 10,

2008. Copies of any such objections shall be served on all other interested

Case 4:03-cr-00069-MW-CAS Document 181 Filed 02/25/08 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

CASE NO.: 4:03cr69-SPM

parties, i.e., the defendant, retained defense counsel if any, the United States

Public Defender, the United States Attorney, and the Bureau of Prisons, as

appropriate.

The clerk shall send a copy of this notice to the defendant, retained

defense counsel if any, the United States Public Defender, the United States

Attorney, and the Bureau of Prisons.

SO ORDERED this 25th day of February, 2008.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 4:03-cr-00069-MW-CAS Document 181 Filed 02/25/08 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 27 (Wednesday, February 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 6729]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2935]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION


Senior Executive Service (SES) Performance Review Board; Members

AGENCY: National Archives and Records Administration.

ACTION: Notice; SES Performance Review Board.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the appointment of members of the 
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) Performance Review 
Board.

DATES: Effective Date: This appointment is effective on February 10, 
2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pamela S. Pope, Human Resources 
Services Division (NAH), National Archives and Records Administration, 
9700 Page Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63132, (314) 801-0882.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 4314(c) of Title 5, U.S.C., requires 
each agency to establish, in accordance with regulations prescribed by 
the Office of Personnel Management, one or more SES Performance Review 
Boards. The Board shall review the initial appraisal of a senior 
executive's performance by the supervisor and recommend final action to 
the appointing authority regarding matters related to senior executive 
performance.
    The members of the Performance Review Board for the National 
Archives and Records Administration are: Adrienne C. Thomas, Deputy 
Archivist of the United States, Michael J. Kurtz, Assistant Archivist 
for Records Services--Washington, DC, and Martha A. Morphy, Assistant 
Archivist for Information Services. These appointments supersede all 
previous appointments.

    Dated: February 4, 2010.
David S. Ferriero,
Archivist of the United States.
[FR Doc. 2010-2935 Filed 2-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515-01-P
77


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of CNE Group,  Inc. (the  "Registrant")  on
Form 10-KSB for the annual  period  ending  December  31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony
S. Conigliaro,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss. 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to ss.906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

                                                      /s/ Anthony S. Conigliaro
                                                      -------------------------
                                                      Anthony S. Conigliaro
                                                      Chief Financial Officer
                                                      April 15, 2005
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with Genco Shipping & Trading Limited’s (the “Company”) quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned President of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date: August 10, 2009

/s/  Robert Gerald BuchananName:  Robert Gerald BuchananTitle: President





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



Exhibit 21

The following is a list of subsidiaries of SETO Holdings, Inc.:

|                               |  |                       |  | 
|------------------------------ |  | --------------------- |  | 
|                               |  | State/Jurisdiction of
|Name of Subsidiary             |  | Incorporation        
|                               |  |                      
|Semicon Tools, Inc.            |  | New York             
|East Coast Sales Company, Inc. |  | Connecticut          
|DTI Technology Sdn. Bhd        |  | Malaysia             
|SETO Technology Sdn. Bhd       |  | Malaysia