alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 3201.148 Transmission fluids. ( a ) *Definition.* Transmission fluids are liquids that lubricate and cool the moving parts in a transmission to prevent wearing and to ensure smooth performance.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The Federal preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 60 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than July 6, 2020, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased transmission fluids. By that date, Federal agencies responsible for drafting or reviewing specifications for products to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased transmission fluids.
( d ) *Determining overlap with a designated product category in the EPA's CPG program.* Qualifying products within this product category may overlap with the EPA's CPG-designated recovered content product category of Vehicular Products: Re-refined Lubricating Oil. USDA is requesting that manufacturers of these qualifying biobased products provide information on the BioPreferred Program's website about the intended uses of the product, information on whether the product contains any recovered material, in addition to biobased ingredients, and performance standards against which the product has been tested. This information will assist Federal agencies in determining whether a qualifying biobased product overlaps with the EPA's CPG-designated Vehicular Products: Re-Refined Lubricating Oil and which product should be afforded the preference in purchasing.
Note 1 to Paragraph ( d
):
Transmission fluids within this designated product category can compete with similar transmission fluids with recycled content. Under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, section 6002, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency CPG-designated product categories Vehicular Products: Re-Refined Lubricating Oil containing recovered materials as products for which Federal agencies must give preference in their purchasing programs. The designation can be found in the Comprehensive Procurement Guideline, 40 CFR 247.11.
[84 FR 32021, July 5, 2019]
#### § 301.80-10 Nonliability of the Department.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture disclaims liability for any costs incident to inspections or compliance with the provisions of the quarantine and regulations in this subpart, other than for the services of the inspector.

[35 FR 10553, June 30, 1970, as amended at 36 FR 24917, Dec. 24, 1971]
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JOHN O. WILLIAMS, 

Petitioner,

v. 4:20cv268–WS/HTC

MARK S. INCH,

Respondent.

 

ORDER DISMISSING PETITIONER’S 

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF

No. 3) docketed June 9, 2020. The magistrate judge recommends that Petitioner’s

“Motion for Relief in Judgment” be DISMISSED. Petitioner has filed objections

(ECF No. 8) to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, and those

objections have been carefully reviewed by the undersigned. 

Upon review of the record in light of Petitioner’s objections, the undersigned

has determined that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation is due to be

adopted. 

Case 4:20-cv-00268-WS-HTC Document 9 Filed 11/12/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF No. 3) is hereby

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order.

2. Claims one (1) through seven (7) and claim ten of Petitioner’s “Motion

for Relief in Judgment” (ECF No. 1) are DISMISSED as unauthorized successive

claims.

3. Claims eight (8) and nine (9) are construed as a motion under Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) and are DISMISSED without prejudice to

Petitioner’s filing a motion raising those same grounds for relief in Case No.

4:14cv629–RH. 

4. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: "Petitioner's “Motion for Relief in

Judgment” is DISMISSED."

5. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 12th day of November , 2020.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE. 

Case 4:20-cv-00268-WS-HTC Document 9 Filed 11/12/20 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JAMI CLAIRE, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No. 4:20cv20-MW/MAF

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF

MANAGEMENT SERVICES,

et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________/

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT

The FDC Defendants have filed their Amended Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’

Amended Complaint. ECF No. 66. For this reason, the Motion to Dismiss of the 

FDC Defendants, ECF No. 59, is denied as moot.

SO ORDERED on June 23, 2020.

s/ MARK E. WALKER

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00020-MW-MAF Document 67 Filed 06/23/20 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 

v. Case No. 3:20cr35-TKW

PHI NGUYEN

a/k/a PHI NQUYEN

_____________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11, Fed.

R. Crim. P., and has entered a plea of guilty to Counts One and Two of the

Indictment. After cautioning and examining the Defendant under oath concerning

each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined the guilty plea was knowing

and voluntary and the offenses charged are supported by independent basis in fact

containing each of the essential elements thereof. I therefore recommend the plea of

guilty be accepted and the Defendant be adjudicated guilty and have sentence

imposed accordingly.

Dated: July 28, 2020.

/s/Charles J. Kahn, Jr. 

CHARLES J. KAHN, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:20-cr-00035-TKW Document 104 Filed 07/28/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Objections to these proposed findings and recommendations may be filed

within twenty-four (24) hours after being served a copy thereof. Any different

deadline that may appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use

only and does not control. A copy of objections shall be served upon the

magistrate judge and all other parties. A party failing to object to a magistrate

judge’s findings or recommendations contained in a report and recommendation

in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) waives the right to

challenge on appealthe district court’s order based on unobjected-to factual and

legal conclusions. See U.S. Ct. of App. 11th Cir. Rule 3-1; 28 U.S.C. § 636.

Case No. 3:20cr35-TKW

Case 3:20-cr-00035-TKW Document 104 Filed 07/28/20 Page 2 of 2
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk July 15, 2010

d0708 

# Order

July 15, 2010

140334

MAHENDRA DALMIA, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 140334 COA: 281706 Oakland CC: 2003-052350-NH CARL PALFFY, M.D. and EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS ASSOCIATES, P.C., Defendants-Appellees,

and

ST. JOSEPH MERCY HOSPITAL PONTIAC, a/k/a TRINITY HEALTH-MICHIGAN, Defendant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 1, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

H ATHAWAY , J., would grant leave to appeal.
#### § 28.506 Color Grade No. 6.

Color grade No. 6 shall be American Pima cotton which in color is within the range represented by a set of samples in the custody of the U.S. Department of Agriculture in a container marked “Original Official Cotton Standards of the United States, American Pima, Color Grade No. 6, effective July 1, 1986.”

[65 FR 36600, June 9, 2000]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Case No. DA 21 - 0533 STAND UP MONTANA, a Montana non

- profit Corporation; CLINTON DECKER; MORGEN HUNT; GABRIEL EARLE; ERICK PRATHER; BRADFORD CAMPBELL; MEAGAN CAMPBELL; and JARED ORR,

Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. MISSOULA COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, ELEMENTARY DISTRICT NO. 1, HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, MISSOULA COUNTY, STATE OF MONTANA; TARGET RANGE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 23; and HELLGATE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 4,

Defendants and Appellees. STAND UP MONTANA, a Montana non - profit corporation; JASMINE ALBERINO; TIMOTHY ALBERINO; VICTORIA BENTLEY; DAVID DICKEY; WESLEY GILBERT; KATIE GILBERT; KIERSTEN GLOVER; RICHARD JORGENSON; STEPHEN PRUIETT; LINDSEY PRUIETT; ANGELA MARSHALL; SEAN LITTLEJOHN; and KENTON SAWDY,

Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. 05/18/20222

BOZEMAN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 7, MONFORTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 27, and BIG SKY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 72,

Defendants and Appellees. ORDER GRANTINGMOTIONFOR DISMISSA L OF CLAIMS OF APPELLANT DAVID DICKEY On Appeal from the Montana Fourth Judicial District Court

Missoula County, Cause No. DV

- 21 - 1031 Before Hon. Jason Marks On Appeal from the Montana Eighteenth Judicial District Court

Gallatin County, Cause No. DV

- 21 - 975B Before Hon. Rienne H. McElyea Quentin M. Rhoades RHOADES & ERICKSON PLLC 430 Ryman Street Missoula, Montana 59802 Telephone: 406
- 721 - 9700 qmr@montanalawyer.com courtdocs@montanalawyer.com For A ppellants Elizabeth A. Kaleva Kevin A. Twidwell Elizabeth A. O’Halloran KALEVA LAW OFFICES 1911 S. Higgins Ave. P.O. Box 9312 Missoula, MT 59807 eakaleva@kalevalaw.com ktwidwell@kalevalaw.com bohalloran@kalevalaw.com For Appellees Pursuant to the Unopposed Motion for Dismissal filed by David Dickey, and with good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the claims of David Dickey in the above entitled action are voluntarily dismissed with prejudice.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 18 2022
§ 3565.9 Compliance with federal requirements. The Agency and the lender are responsible for ensuring that the application is in compliance with all applicable federal requirements, including the following specific statutory requirements: ( a ) *Intergovernmental review.* 7 CFR part 3015, subpart V, “Intergovernmental Review of Department of Agriculture Programs and Activities”, or successor regulation, including the Agency supplemental administrative instruction, RD Instruction 1970-I, ‘Intergovernmental Review,’ available in any Agency office or on the Agency's Web site.
( b ) *National flood insurance.* The National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended by the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973; the National Flood Insurance Reform Act of 1994; and 7 CFR part 1806, subpart B, or successor regulation.
( c ) *Clean Air Act and Water Pollution Control Act Requirements.* For any contract, all applicable standards, orders or requirements issued under section 306 of the Clean Air Act; section 508 of the Clean Water Act; Executive Order 11738; and EPA regulations at part 32, of title 40.
( d ) *Historic preservation requirements.* The provisions of 7 CFR part 1901, subpart F or successor regulation.
( e ) *Lead-based paint requirements.* The provisions of 7 CFR part 1924, subpart A, or successor regulation.
[63 FR 39458, July 22, 1998, as amended at 64 FR 32372, June 16, 1999; 76 FR 80731, Dec. 27, 2011]
**EXHIBIT 31.2** **Certification    Pursuant to    Rule 13a-14(a)    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934**     I, Christopher A. Black, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on    Form 10-Q    of American Commercial Lines Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this quarterly report,    fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls    and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosures controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is    being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably    likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal    control over the financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. /s/  Christopher    A. Black    Christopher A. Black    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer     Date: November 8, 2006
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2471 

To amend the Department of Energy Organization Act to transfer regulatory 

authority over exports of natural gas from the Secretary of Energy 

to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 20, 2013 

Mr. POE of Texas (for himself and Mr. HALL) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in 

addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Department of Energy Organization Act to 

transfer regulatory authority over exports of natural gas 

from the Secretary of Energy to the Federal Energy 

Regulatory Commission, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Expedite Our Economy 

5 Act of 2013’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2471 IH

1 SEC. 2. JURISDICTION OF THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGU2 LATORY COMMISSION. 

3 (a) TRANSFER OF FUNCTIONS.—Section 402(a)(1) of 

4 the Department of Energy Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 

5 7172(a)(1)) is amended— 

6 (1) in subparagraph (E), by striking ‘‘; and’’ 

7 and inserting a semicolon; 

8 (2) in subparagraph (F), by striking the period 

9 at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

10 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub11 paragraph: 

12 ‘‘(G) the regulation of the exportation of nat13 ural gas under section 3 of the Natural Gas Act.’’. 

14 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 402(f) of 

15 the Department of Energy Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 

16 7172(f)) is amended by striking ‘‘the exports or imports 

17 of natural gas or electricity’’ and inserting ‘‘the imports 

18 of natural gas, or the exports or imports of electricity,’’. 

19 SEC. 3. REPORT ON GLOBAL EXPORTS OF NATURAL GAS 

20 PRODUCTION. 

21 Not later than 180 days after the date of the enact22 ment of this Act, the Secretary of State shall submit to 

23 Congress a report on the following: 

24 (1) The economic policies of foreign countries 

25 with natural gas resources and reserves as such poli26 cies relate to the development and production of 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2471 IH

1 their natural gas resources and reserves and the ex2 tent and status of their natural gas resources and 

3 reserves. 

4 (2) The potential to export the natural gas pro5 duction of such foreign countries to the global mar6 ket and the impact of the export of such natural gas 

7 production on the global market. 

8 (3) A description of actions taken by the United 

9 States Government to foster natural gas exports to 

10 foreign countries that may have an interest in im11 porting natural gas from the United States. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-9112-9]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

Notice of Charter Renewal.

The Charter for the Environmental Protection Agency's Local Government's Advisory Committee (LGAC) will be renewed for an additional two-year period, as a necessary committee which is in the public interest, in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. App. 2. The purpose of LGAC is to provide advice and recommendations to EPA's Administrator on ways to improve its partnership with Local Governments and provide more efficient and effective environmental protection.

It is determined that LGAC is in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed on the Agency by law.

                    Inquiries may be directed to Frances Eargle, Designated Federal Officer, LGAC, U.S. EPA (mail code 1301A), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460, or                     *eargle.frances@epa.gov.*

Dated: January 29, 2010. 

David G. McIntosh,

Associate Administrator, Office of Congressional & Intergovernmental Relations.

[FR Doc. 2010-2978 Filed 2-9-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
98-1289.

#### State ex rel. Costakos v. Donchatz.

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss, motion to amend complaint, and motion to seal record of proceedings. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

ISSAC GADDY,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 1:20-cv-46-AW-GRJ

MARK INCH,

Respondent.

____________________________/

ORDER

I have considered the magistrate judge’s March 13, 2020, Report and 

Recommendation. ECF No. 5. No objections have been filed. I have determined that 

the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. It is ordered:

1. The Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 5, is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. The clerk will enter a judgment that says, “This case is dismissed for 

lack of jurisdiction.”

3. The clerk will close the file.

SO ORDERED on April 21, 2020.

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-00046-AW-GRJ Document 6 Filed 04/22/20 Page 1 of 1
#### § 2812.5 Restrictions.

(a) The authorized official (see § 2812.4(b)) will approve the donation of excess personal property/equipment in the following groups to educational institutions or nonprofit organizations for the conduct of technical and scientific educational and research activities.

| FSC group | Name |
| --- | --- |
| 19 | Ships, Small Craft, Pontoons, and Floating Docks. |
| 23 | Vehicles, Trailers and Cycles. |
| 24 | Tractors. |
| 37 | Agricultural Machinery and Equipment. |
| 43 | Pumps, Compressors. |
| 48 | Valves. |
| 58 | Communication, Detection, and Coherent Radiation Equipment. |
| 59 | Electrical and Electronic Equipment Components. |
| 65 | Medical, Dental, and Veterinary Equipment and Supplies. |
| 66 | Instruments and Laboratory Equipment. |
| 67 | Photographic Equipment. |
| 68 | Chemicals and Chemical Products. |
| 70 | General Purpose Automatic Data Processing Equipment, Software Supplies, and Support Equipment. |
| 74 | Office Machines and Visible Record Equipment. |

Eligible Groups

Note:

Requests for items in FSC Groups or Classes other than the above should be referred to the agency head for consideration and approval.

(b) Excess personal property/equipment may be donated for cannibalization purposes, provided the donee submits a supporting statement which clearly indicates that cannibalizing the requested property for secondary use has greater potential benefit than utilization of the item in its existing form.
Case 4:90-cr-04023-WS-WCS Document 592 Filed 02/02/06 Page 1 of 3Case 4:90-cr-04023-WS-WCS Document 592 Filed 02/02/06 Page 2 of 3Case 4:90-cr-04023-WS-WCS Document 592 Filed 02/02/06 Page 3 of 3
# CI2021305EN.01000101.xml

| 30.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 305/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 305/1

---

Joint Statement of the European Parliament and of the Commission

(2021/C 305 I/01)

In the event that the expected cumulative resources from assigned revenues would differ substantially from the amount referred to in Article 4(1)(b), the Parliament, based on a proposal of the Commission, will identify and support the allocation to the Facility, in accordance with Article 314 TFEU, of complementary resources needed to address the financing needs of the Facility and ensure its full implementation. The proposal of the Commission will be consistent with the multiannual financial framework and will not jeopardise the implementation of the programmes listed in Annex I of the Regulation (EU) 2021/1229 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 July 2021 on the public sector loan facility under the Just Transition Mechanism.

---