alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 3.4 Delegations of authority.

The head of an agency is authorized to exercise any or all of the functions provided by this part with respect to programs for which the head of the agency has delegated responsibility and may delegate and authorize the redelegation of any of the functions vested in the head of the agency by this part, except as otherwise provided by this part.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Davidson
Growth Plus L.P. 1995 Year-End 10-KSB and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such 10-KSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000795757
<NAME> DAVIDSON GROWTH PLUS L.P.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       1,160,550
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,473
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,449,909
<PP&E>                                      23,342,897
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,623,971
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              18,168,835
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          593,231
<BONDS>                                     12,321,816
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,872,154
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                18,168,835
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,968,138
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,558,308
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,089,689
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   343,669
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    11.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-2161

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

THOMAS G. ELLIS; THOMAS H. VETTER; CHAREL WINSTON, Relief 

Defendants,

Defendants - Appellants,

and

NORTH STAR FINANCE LLC; YASUO ODA; MICHAEL K. MARTIN; 

SHARON L. SALINAS; CAPITAL SOURCE FUNDING LLC; CAPITAL 

SOURCE LENDING LLC; GOODWILL FUNDING INC., Relief Defendants,

Defendants,

v.

ANDREW HUTCHISON; GRIFFITH THOMAS ELLIS,

Third Party Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. 

George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge. (8:15-cv-01339-GJH)

Submitted: September 30, 2020 Decided: October 23, 2020

Before MOTZ, FLOYD, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.
2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas G. Ellis, Thomas H. Vetter, Charel Winston, Appellants Pro Se. Sarah Ribstein

Prins, Office of the General Counsel, UNITED STATES SECURITIES & EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Thomas G. Ellis, Thomas H. Vetter, and Charel Winston appeal the district court’s 

order granting summary judgment to the Securities and Exchange Commission in its civil 

enforcement action and ordering disgorgement of all ill-gotten funds.

*

 We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by 

the district court. Sec. & Exch. Comm’n v. North Star Fin., LLC, No. 8:15-cv-01339-GJH 

(D. Md. Aug. 16, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* Although North Star Finance, LLC, and Goodwill Funding Inc. were listed on the 

notice of appeal, those entities are not permitted to proceed pro se on appeal. As neither 

entity is represented by counsel in this court, we have not considered any claim as to them.
EXHIBIT
      32.2





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**  **18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
      THE**  **SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Arrow Resources Development,
      Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter
      J. Frugone, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)
        the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




April
      15,
      2008


/s/ Peter
                J. FrugonePeter
                J. FrugoneChief
                Financial Officer
## I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 12-30935 Summary Calendar

IN RE: VIOXX PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

------------------------------------------------------------------------------ WALTER J. ROAC H , J R

. , A dministrator of the Estate of Joanne I

. Roach, Deceased, Plaintiff - Appellant

v. MERCK AND COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Defendant - Appellee

A ppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:05-MD-1657
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, OWEN, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * 

### This appeal concerns one of the remainin g personal injury claims in the Vioxx litiga t i o n. The district court granted Merck’s motion f or summary judgment, concluding that the Plaintiff’s a ction was barred by the applicable U n i t e d S t a te s C o u r t o f A p p e al s

F i f t h C i rc u i t 

## F I L E D June 18, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47. 5. 4. 

### Case: 12-30935 Document: 00512278460 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/18/2013

### No. 12-30935

statute o f limitations. W e AFFIRM the district c ourt’s order granting summary judgment in favor o f Merck for essentially the same reasons set forth in its Order & Reasons. 1

1 Plaintif

f

- A p p ellant argues , f

or the f irs t tim e on ap p eal, that M erck w aived its s tatute of lim itations d ef

ens e. We can f

ind no ind ication in the record that P laintif f

- Ap p ellant m ad e this argum ent in the d is trict court. Keep ing w ith our w ell- settled rule that “argum ents not rais ed bef

ore the d is trict court are w aived and cannot be rais ed f or the f irs t tim e on ap p eal, ” w e d o not ad d res s the argum ent. LeM a i re v . Loui si a na D ep t. of Tra nsp . & D ev . , 480 F. 3d 383, 387 ( 5th C ir. 2007)

. 

### 2 Case: 12-30935 Document: 00512278460 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/18/2013
§ 3430.11 Competition. ( a ) *Standards for competition.* Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, NIFA will enter into grants and cooperative agreements, unless restricted by statute, only after competition.
( b ) *Exception.* The NIFA ADO and the designated Agency approving official may make a determination in writing that competition is not deemed appropriate for a particular transaction. Such determination shall be limited to transactions where it can be adequately justified that a noncompetitive award is in the best interest of the Federal Government and necessary to the goals of the program.
Exhibit
10.13


 


Summary of
Relocation Arrangement

between NetBank, Inc. and Douglas K. Freeman


 


Date:                    November 2004


 


In connection with Mr.
Freeman’s relocation from Atlanta to Jacksonville, the Company agreed to
purchase from Mr. Freeman a condominium located in Atlanta used by him as his
residence.  The purchase price was
$1,759,430, representing the $1,7450,000 appraised
value of the condominium plus $9,430, which was the amount Mr. Freeman had
incurred in capital improvements on the condominium.
EXHIBIT 13.1  SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*  In connection with the annual report of North American Nickel Inc. (formerly Widescope Resources Inc.) (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard J. Mark, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) the Report containing the financial statements of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: May 2, 2014  /s/ Richard J. Mark Richard J. Mark Chief Executive Officer  * A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 24, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 71715]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29677]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection


Accreditation and Approval of Amspec Services LLC, as a 
Commercial Gauger and Laboratory

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of accreditation and approval of AmSpec Services LLC, as 
a commercial gauger and laboratory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 
CFR 151.13, AmSpec Services LLC, 1818 A Federal Road, Galena Park, TX 
77015, has been approved to gauge and accredited to test petroleum and 
petroleum products for customs purposes, in accordance with the 
provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ 
this entity to conduct laboratory analyses and gauger services should 
request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is 
accredited or approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to 
conduct the specific test or gauger service requested. Alternatively, 
inquires regarding the specific test or gauger service this entity is 
accredited or approved to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs 
and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also 
be sent to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d4b7b6a4fab8b5b6bca594b0bca7fab3bba2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9dfeffedb3f1fcfff5ecddf9f5eeb3faf2eb">[email protected]</span></a>. Please reference the Web site listed 
below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited 
laboratories.
    http://cbp.gov/xp/cgov/import/operations_support/labs_scientific_svcs/commercial_gaugers/.

DATES: The accreditation and approval of Amspec Services LLC, as 
commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on July 23, 2010. The 
next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for July 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony Malana, Laboratories and 
Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-
1060.

    Dated: November 16, 2010.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
[FR Doc. 2010-29677 Filed 11-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 3430.53 Program income. ( a ) *General.* NIFA shall apply the standards set forth in this subpart in requiring awardee organizations to account for program income related to projects financed in whole or in part with Federal funds.
( b ) *Addition method.* Unless otherwise provided in the authorizing statute, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the award, program income earned during the project period shall be retained by the awardee and shall be added to funds committed to the project by NIFA and the awardee and used to further eligible project or program objectives. Any specific program deviations will be identified in the individual subparts.
( c ) *Award terms and conditions.* Unless the program regulations identified in the individual subpart provide otherwise, awardees shall follow the terms and conditions of the award.
### [4910-13-P) DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION n"WRl'iNCES OVrrNG SYMlIOl.



# o DATE M 

# 11/ •."" tmNG S\"M80I. 

# ~NiJ,-1 INITIAlS',lG 

### (.~ 

## \IL,-D,

# R, 

# 7J.Z:C~ m 

## /;/2./01 

# -, II 

# -RB

infonnation 

### (MeAl) originated 

### byan aviation authority of another country to identify



### Tnthepast, some operators have reported difficulties topressurise the hydraulic reservoirs, due to leakage ofthe Crissair reservoir air pressurization check valves. 

## *** The leakage ofthe check valves was caused by an incorrect spring material. The affected Crissair check valves 

## *** were then replaced with improved check valves PIN 252794-1 "',

This situation, ifnot corrected, can cause hydraulic system 

### functional degradation, possibly resulting inreduced control o[the aeroplane when combined with anairduct leak, airconditioning system contamination or, ifinstalled, malfunction ofthe fire More recently, similar issues were again reported on aeroplanes with Crissair check valves 

### PIN 2S2794-1 installed. The investigations 

## *** have shown that a spring, mounted inside the valve, does not meet the Airbus type design specifications. listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness ACTION: Notice ofproposed rulemaking (NPRM). 

### AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A300, A300-600, and A31 0 Airplanes

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt anew airworthiness directive (AD) for the product 

### Federal Aviation Administration
illN 2120-AA64 14CFRPart39 

# ;;;.o10-D172 [Docket No. FAA-l6()9:*****; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-189-AD)



# , .lir o 'and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The 

### MeAl describes the unsafe ilTh'G) SYMOOL • 

# k"'D-1l condition as:
§ 3555.302 Protective advances. Lenders may pay the following pre-liquidation expenses necessary to protect the security property and charge the cost against the borrower's account. ( a ) *Advances for taxes and insurance.* Without prior Agency concurrence, lenders may advance funds to pay past due real estate taxes, hazard and flood insurance premiums, and other related costs.
( b ) *Advances for costs other than taxes and insurance.* Protective advances for costs other than taxes and insurance, such as emergency repairs, can be made only if the borrower cannot, or will not, obtain an additional loan or reimbursement from an insurer or the borrower has abandoned the property. The lender must determine that any repairs funded by protective advances are cost effective. Repairs funded by protective advances must be planned, performed and inspected in accordance with § 3555.202 and as further described by the Agency. The lender must obtain prior Agency concurrence before issuing protective advances under this paragraph of a significant amount as specified by the Agency.
[78 FR 73941, Dec. 9, 2013, as amended at 81 FR 6430, Feb. 8, 2016; 84 FR 70886, Dec. 26, 2019]
## F I FTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
Case No. 5D2024

- 0957 L.T. Case No. 2013

- CF

- 338

- A

_____________________________
R AYTAURUS A RMSTRONG , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County, London M. Kite , Judge

. Raytaurus Armstrong, Madison, pro se

. No Appearance for Appellee.

October 4 , 2024

P ER C URIAM

. Appellant sought relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.8 0 0 (a) . Appellant appealed the trial court’s summary dismissal of his 3.8 0 0 motion as successive . We reverse and remand with instructions for the postconviction court to either attach to its order Appellant’s three prior motions and their accompanying orders pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a)(2)

, or to review and address the merits of the motion . O ur reversal should not be construed or interpreted by the postconviction court as indicating that we have determined, on the2 merits, that Armstrong is entitled to relief on his motion

. See Jones v. State , 198 So. 3d 920, 921 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016)

.

REVERSED and REMANDED with instructions.

E DWARDS , C.J., and K ILBANE and M AC I VER , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2448 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2448

         To end unemployment payments to jobless millionaires.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 20, 2013

 Mr. Lankford introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To end unemployment payments to jobless millionaires.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ending Unemployment Payments to 
Jobless Millionaires Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. ENDING UNEMPLOYMENT PAYMENTS TO JOBLESS MILLIONAIRES.

    (a) Prohibition.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no 
Federal funds may be used to make payments of unemployment compensation 
(including such compensation under the Federal-State Extended 
Compensation Act of 1970 and the emergency unemployment compensation 
program under title IV of the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2008) in 
a year to an individual whose resources in the preceding year were 
equal to or greater than $1,000,000. For purposes of the preceding 
sentence, with respect to a year, an individual's resources shall be 
determined in the same manner as a subsidy eligible individual's 
resources are determined for the year under section 1860D-14(a)(3)(E) 
of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w-114(a)(3)(E)).
    (b) Effective Date.--The prohibition under subsection (a) shall 
apply to weeks of unemployment beginning on or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2434 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2434

To require the Director of National Intelligence to conduct a study on 
   the use of contractors for intelligence activities, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 19, 2013

 Ms. Jackson Lee (for herself, Mr. Stockman, Mr. Lewis, Mr. Johnson of 
  Georgia, Ms. Lee of California, Mr. Danny K. Davis of Illinois, Mr. 
 Cummings, Mr. McGovern, Mr. Castro of Texas, Ms. Bass, Mr. Jeffries, 
Ms. Fudge, and Mr. Cicilline) introduced the following bill; which was 
  referred to the Select Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select)

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Director of National Intelligence to conduct a study on 
   the use of contractors for intelligence activities, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Civilian Contractors Engaged in 
Intelligence Activities Reduction Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE STUDY ON THE USE OF 
              CONTRACTORS IN THE CONDUCT OF INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES.

    (a) Study.--The Director of National Intelligence shall conduct a 
study to ascertain the extent to which contractors are used in the 
conduct of intelligence activities and the type of information to which 
such contractors are exposed or have access.
    (b) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2013, the Director of 
Intelligence shall submit to Congress a report containing--
            (1) the results of the study conducted under subsection 
        (a); and
            (2) a plan for reducing by 25 percent the number of 
        contractors to the intelligence community with top secret 
        security clearances that are engaged in intelligence activities 
        (including intelligence analysis).
    (c) Reduction of Contractors.--Not later than December 31, 2014, 
the Director of National Intelligence shall reduce the number of 
contractors to the intelligence community with top secret security 
clearances that are engaged in intelligence activities (including 
intelligence analysis) as of the date of the enactment of this Act by 
25 percent.
    (d) Intelligence Community Defined.--In this section, the term 
``intelligence community'' has the meaning given the term in section 
3(4) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003(4)).
                                 <all>
```
§ 3431.8 Purpose and scope. ( a ) *Purpose.* The regulations of this subpart apply to the award of veterinary medicine loan repayments under the Veterinary Medicine Loan Repayment Program (VMLRP) authorized by the National Veterinary Medicine Service Act, 7 U.S.C. 3151a.
( b ) *Scope.* Under the VMLRP, the Secretary enters into service agreements with veterinarians to pay principal and interest on education loans of veterinarians who agree to work in veterinary shortage situations for a prescribed period of time. In addition, program participants may enter into an agreement to provide services to the Federal government in emergency situations in exchange for salary, travel, per diem expenses, and additional amounts of loan repayment assistance. The purpose of the program is to assure an adequate supply of trained food animal veterinarians in shortage situations and provide USDA with a pool of veterinary specialists to assist in the control and eradication of animal disease outbreaks.