EXHIBIT A

Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 1 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 2 of 178
5/28/2020

tpoilaluitt

Expand All

NO

I PartyName I Partya I Atiomey I BarlD

KEIM, DONNAMICHELLE JLIDGE

CJHESTERINC DEFENDANT

LEONCE,ROMANIISS I"LAINTIFF FINE,JACKJ 223700

LEIA,JOSa)HM [)EFENDANT HOWELL,JOHNMOFFITT 243027

POWERS,LARRYEJR DEFENDANT POVIERS,LARRYEDWARD 705934

ANGALL-LEONCE,MARCELLEA PLAINTIFF FINE,JACKJ 223700

NATIONALINDEMNITYINSuRllNCE DEFENDANT FERNANDEZ,ELLIST 371556

REDWOODFIREANDCASuALTYINSU DEFENDANT FERlilANDEZ.ELLIST 371556

ONPOINTTRANSPORTINC DEFENOANT HOWELL,JOHNMOFFITT 243027

BERKSHIREHATHAWAYHOMESTATEC DEFENDANT FERNANDEZ.ELLIST 371556

hftpS://WWW- ------- ----' -rr'

Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 3 of 178
Image Doc# : AelianDaleI Oescilpllon" Paies

q- ozntrzozo puixripp'srroriceopheosixa-ozizoizozo@:iispv.tiootiius 2

S o:imatzozo PLlllNTIFF'SMOTIONTOAMEN[)FIRSTAMENDEOCOMPIAINT i:i

(B O,,27,2020 NbeOhTallC, ojOMFARAcPPEEALLERAANNCNEAON GFACLOLuLNESOENLCAEN(OP DEISNTIGIFNFA)TION OFE-MAILDoREss PURsUANT TORIILE251BJAcKJFINESQ(Ailomey) on 2

S_ oitt<tzo;ro AFFIDAVITOFSERVICE-SERVEDO1l0912020JOSEPHMISATULILEIA(DEFENDANT). 3

[f) oiromo'o MOTIONFORSPECIALAPPEARANCETOQUASHSERVICEOFPROCESSAllIOTODISMISSFORINSUFFIClENTSERVlCEOFPROCE8S g

S i;ii:ioizoig SHERIFF'SRETURNON20-DAYSuMMONS-SERVEDj2120l190Nl"01NTTRANSPORT(DEFENDANT). 3

% rzt.iizoig suxvoxsissut_oaost_p+iuisoruuceyot:rexoiix'r). 2

l@1 izttmopi unepiv'iecoqosvoissutiosuxxoxsooreoiziatig 3

G ,,,6,2oi9 ALEDTTDREERSisU)NABLE TOISSUESUMMONS IAOTHOUT ALETTER STATINGTHATTHEREWAsNOSERuCE ONTHE8633EMANNINGAVESELMA 3

5 ,,06,20,9 qLEoTT,:Rs(sUiNABLETOISSUESuMMONSlMTHOUTALETTERSTATINGTHATTHEREWASNOSERVICEONTHE8633EMANNIN,

l_ ,,05,20,9 qLEoTTo:=:(:iNABLETOISSllESUMMONSWITHOuTALETTERSTATINGTHATTHEREWASNOSERVICEONTHE8633EMANNINGA,

% i'xiar:io*g zoooysuxxorisissueoaosephxistvuuceyoepexooxB 2

Q,_ izio<izoig xoriorrooppoiinphocesssesvt_q i

q ,,03,20,9 sELLlHM)MONS ISSuED-JOSEPH MISATULI LEIA(DEFENDAN T).(PERPLAINTIFFS LETTER-THIssuMMONS WANEVERSENTFORSERVICE- 2

% s uizsi;ioig SUMMONStlNISStlE[)-CLERKUNAJ3LETOISSUEfDUPLICATESUMMONSI.ARRYEPOWERSJR([)EFENDANT), 2

[[l 1 utzstmig oxeriot_ocoxpuiixrpopoqxochs :i

l. 2 itizaizoig NOTICEOFCONFIDENTIALINFORMATIONWITHINCOURTFILING 1

% s ttrzstzotg SuMMONSllNISSUED-CLERKUNABLETOISSll8NOSHERIFFRETuRNONuiSTSuMMONSCJHESTERINC(DEFENDANT), 1

q,) 4 mzeizoig SUMMONSUNISSUED-CLI_RKllNABLETOISSUEINOSHERIFFRETllRNONIJSTsuMMONSONPOINTTRANSPORT(DEFENDANT). i

l- 3 mzetzotg suurxoxsissueouiqq'rppoweqsap(oa:eritioxr), 2

[1 vmgtzotg NOTICEOFCONFIDENTIALINFORMATIONWITHINCOIIRTFILING 1

!) 1111912019 AMENOEDCOMPIAINTFORDAMAGES(APPEARSTOREMOVEDEFENDANTS) 3

Q,_ ,,h9,20,9 SUMMONS uNISuED-CLERKUNABLETOISSUEASNAMEINSTYLEDOESNOTMATCHNAMEINCOMPLAINT JOSEPHMISATIILI LEIA 2 (OEFEllj)ANT),

[5 tittgtzotg suxxoxsissuiocahesn=piixc(DEFENDANT), 1

q% uiighoig SuMMONSISSIJEDONPOINTTRANSPORT(DEFENDANT). 1

[[,, ,0,2,20, 9 0RDERGRANTINO [)EFENDANTs tieowootiFIREANDCASUALTY INSIIRANCE COMPANY. NATIONAL INDEMNITY IN:5URANCE, AND 2 BERKSHIREHATHAWAYHOMESTATECOMPANIES' MOTION TO DISMISS 1110THPREJIII)ICE (CLOSES)

% ionihoig iiwpuiiaoisposmosponu i

Q%_ ioiozizoig oxswppoxoappitixoviveoepeiseutii'tt_powa'isapi(oa'tirioaxr) 2

% ogtzmotg s+tepu-p'strerupriioryzo-ooysuxuoris-uxsenveogosep+ivisq'ruuieyoeperiooxr), :i

% ogizmoig SHERIFF'SRETuRNON20-DAYSUMMONS-SERVEDREDWOODFIREANDCASIIALTYINSURANCECOMPANY(DEFENDANT). 1

(i 0912712019 sheqipp'sqt:runxoxzooaysuvxows-uxsetivtooripouv'nmxspoqr(oeppxooxi). i

Q,) oghmoig siia;upp'spiprui:ixox;io-ooysuvvoxs-sepvioritmoxocixoevxi'i'nxsuwxce(oh:psiooxB, i

q,) ogizzizoig siiepiipp'sperupxox;io-ooysuuuoxs-seqveoea'iitssitis+uniowontoxesurecoxpoxies(oepexoox'r), i

IQ) 0912412019 DEFENDANT'SNOTICEOFHEARING-lafllll9@3PM 2

l 09,24,20,9 [)EFENDANT'SMOTIONT%lSMISSELLISTFERNANDEZlllESO(Att0mey)onbshaliOtREDWOODFIREANDCASuALTYINSURANCE 3

COMPANY, NATIONALINDEMNIT/INSURANCE.BERKSHIFIEHATHAWAYHOMESTATECOMPANIESiDEFENDANT)

% ognaizoig tu-pioovrropsptivice-sesveouqp'rppowpps.ip(oepaiiooxr), i

S, ostiiizoig suxxoxsissueomriovocixoeuxrmrisubxct:(oh:rextxriv), i

% osttaaotg suxrxoxsissueooxpoirnruvsposv(oeraiioox'r). i

Q_ 0811312019 suurxoxsissueoaospphxistvuuu_yoeperitiom). 2

% 0811312019 suvvoxsissuetippnwooorinhoxocosuumxsupmchcoxpoxy(otpexooxB. i

% osttarzotg SUMMONSISSIIEOLARRYEPOWERSJR(DEFENDANT). 2

Q,) osttaizoig !IIIMMONSissueoCJHESTERINC (DEFENDANT). l

% 0811312019 suvvoxsissueosepxssipeiiorhowby+ioxeswecoxporiies(oh:peiooxr), i

5 07,3,,20,9 sSThUMLMEO,NSRRuYNlESS:oE:RvusJTRH(FDEEEFERNeODeAipNln4i1934Dale 07131l2019CLERKUNABLETOISsuElSffLEONSUMMONSMuSTMATCHCAS2

5 07,3,,20,9 ssuuMMMMoONNsstJMxUissTsuMEAoTc-HwicrA:pE:eThReLiiEe:pt 44'l934Dale 07131l2o19CLERKuNABLETOISSuEfNOTAPARTYONTHECASEfST/LEON ,

Q_ 07,3,,2o,9 SsnllMtM_0::ollwNolSoSo:E:iWluToHc:EsEuR;icmeiptvs44uW934c%atceo0,71p3W2y(llto9_:L_:Ro:kl:rA:LETOISSII(jSTYLEONSllM,

[9 07,3,,20,9 sSnllMiM=0uNoSs=UpNhlS,SllsiDrviVl0nT=l:oFtEoE=R,eC:oipot,%41934Date 07131l20l9CLERKuNABLETOISSUE{STYLEONSUMMONSMIISTMATCH(.A2

q o7,3,,20, 9 SsThutxLuEo:AsTluoNNIASLSulN%DE-MlMNITThH FlNEsE4ecNeicpEt a(D4E1 gF.iE4NoDaWie ,0713112019 CLERKLINABLETOISSUEISTYLEONSIIMMONS MLISTMATCHCASE ,

q5 07,3,,20,9 SmUMLMEOBNESRuKsNHISIRSEUEHtiA,HvinAWTHAYFEHEOR;E%eTlpAiT4E4cl9o3M4PDAaNlelEOs7(lD31ElF2EO1N9DCAL,

% ozisitzoig SUMMONS-UNISSUEDCLERKuNABLETOISSllEISTYLEONSuMMONSOOESNOTMATCHCASESTYLEINOFE!_PAID 2

01 omsnoig civiccoveqsseev-gupiyrhiocqeoupmeo 2

[- ometzotg COMPU1lNTRei.eipt441779Date07f2612019 3

https://www.flccis.corn/ccis/app/caseinfomiation.xhtml?query=wUX4PTwwWYj8Qj-hwz-mrpxVCYcqswlFEAqjsudDGlw

5/28/2020 Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 4 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 5 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 6 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 7 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 8 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 9 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 10 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 11 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 12 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 13 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 14 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 15 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 16 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 17 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 18 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 19 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 20 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 21 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 22 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 23 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 24 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 25 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 26 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 27 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 28 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 29 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 30 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 31 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 32 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 33 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 34 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 35 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 36 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 37 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 38 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 39 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 40 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 41 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 42 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 43 of 178
Suit notification email sent: 9/3/2019 5:10 PM DATarmey

Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 44 of 178
Suit notification email sent: 9/3/2019 5:10 PM DATarmey

Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 45 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 46 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 47 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 48 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 49 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 50 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 51 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 52 of 178
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, EIGHTH 

JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR 

ALACHUA COUNTY, FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 2019-CA-2558

MARCELLE ANN ANGALL-LEONCE and

ROMANUS SYLVESTER LEONCE, 

husband and wife, 

Plaintiffs,

vs.

ON POINT TRANSPORT, 

REDWOOD FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,

NATIONAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE, 

BERKSHIRE HATHAWY HOMESTATE COMPANIES, 

JOSEPH MISATULI LEIA, CJ HESTER INC.

And LARRY E. POWERS, Jr 

Defendants.

____________________________________/

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

COME NOW, the Defendants, Redwood Fire and Casualty Insurance Company, 

National Indemnity Insurance, and Berkshire Hathaway Homestate Companies, by and 

through their undersigned counsel, and pursuant to Rule 1.140, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 

and F.S. § 627.4136, and herein files this Motion to Dismiss, and in support thereof would set 

forth the following:

SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT 

The Plaintiff is in violation of Fla. Stat. § 627.4136 and can not directly name an 

insurance company as a party to a lawsuit without first establishing a legal relationship as an 

Filing # 96160134 E-Filed 09/23/2019 05:42:27 PM Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 53 of 178
insured entitling the Plaintiffs to a “direct action” or the existence of a judgment for which they 

seek enforcement. No such allegations exist anywhere in the allegations.

ARGUMENT 

1. The Plaintiffs fail to allege any allegations, whatsoever, entitling them to a direct action 

against these Defendants, as these Defendants are insurance companies.

2. To the point, there are no contracts of insurance attached ... nor even referenced ... 

between the Plaintiffs and these Defendants, that would create any legal relationship 

between the Plaintiffs, and further, there is not even a single reference to a final judgment 

the Plaintiffs possess that would allow either theory to proceed against these Defendants 

by the Plaintiffs.

3. As such, the Plaintiffs are in violation of §627.4136, Florida Statutes, specifically 

prohibiting these Defendants to be made a part of a lawsuit in this State.

4. While there are countless ... literally, countless ... other pleading violations found in the 

Plaintiffs’ Complaint that violate many different pleading rules and regulations (which 

are not being waived by these Defendants), this very specific, and to the issue breach of a 

Statute, requires dismissal.

5. In addition, these Defendants have been required to obtain the services of the undersigned 

and are entitled to payment for all of their fees and costs in association with the 

presentation of this Motion and as such these Defendants demand entitlement to the 

recovery of the same from the Plaintiffs at a subsequent time when this Court can address 

those amounts.

6. Last, the entire Complaint is in violation of the Rules of Civil Procedure as to pleading 

requirements, their presentation, commingling of causes of actions, the pleading of 

irrelevant, immaterial and ultimately inadmissible allegations as set forth in Rules 1.110, 

Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 54 of 178
1.120, 1.130 and 1.150. As such it wholly without merit as to law or fact and should be 

dismissed.

WHEREFORE, these Defendants, Redwood Fire And Casualty Insurance Company, 

National Indemnity Insurance, and Berkshire Hathaway Homestate Companies, 

respectfully request from this Court an Order Dismissing the Plaintiffs’ Complaint, and any other 

relief this Court deems just and proper. 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing has been furnished to Marcelle 

Ann Angall-Leonce and Romanus Sylvester Leonce, Via U.S.Mail to: 2614 Grapevine CRST, 

Ocoee, FL 34761 in this 23rd day of September, 2019. 

FERNANDEZ TRIAL LAWYERS, P.A.

/s/ Ellis .T. Fernandez, III_______________

ELLIS T. FERNANDEZ, III, ESQ. 

Florida Bar No. 371556

JOHN M. HOWELL, ESQ.

Florida Bar No. 243027

8780-200 Perimeter Park Court

Jacksonville, Florida 32216

(904) 398-8008 (Phone)

(904) 398-0332 (Fax)

Attorneys for Defendants

Primary Email: Pleadings@FernandezTL.com

Secondary Email: Jhowell@FernandezTL.com

 rbaker@fernandeztl.com

Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 55 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 56 of 178
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, EIGHTH 

JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR 

ALACHUA COUNTY, FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 2019-CA-2558

MARCELLE ANN ANGALL-LEONCE and

ROMANUS SYLVESTER LEONCE, 

husband and wife, 

Plaintiffs,

vs.

ON POINT TRANSPORT, 

REDWOOD FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,

NATIONAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE, 

BERKSHIRE HATHAWY HOMESTATE COMPANIES, 

JOSEPH MISATULI LEIA, CJ HESTER INC.

And LARRY E. POWERS, Jr 

Defendants.

____________________________________/

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

COME NOW, the Defendants, Redwood Fire and Casualty Insurance Company, 

National Indemnity Insurance, and Berkshire Hathaway Homestate Companies, by and 

through their undersigned counsel, and pursuant to Rule 1.140, Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 

and F.S. § 627.4136, and herein files this Motion to Dismiss, and in support thereof would set 

forth the following:

SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT 

The Plaintiff is in violation of Fla. Stat. § 627.4136 and can not directly name an 

insurance company as a party to a lawsuit without first establishing a legal relationship as an 

Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 57 of 178
insured entitling the Plaintiffs to a “direct action” or the existence of a judgment for which they 

seek enforcement. No such allegations exist anywhere in the allegations.

ARGUMENT 

1. The Plaintiffs fail to allege any allegations, whatsoever, entitling them to a direct action 

against these Defendants, as these Defendants are insurance companies.

2. To the point, there are no contracts of insurance attached ... nor even referenced ... 

between the Plaintiffs and these Defendants, that would create any legal relationship 

between the Plaintiffs, and further, there is not even a single reference to a final judgment 

the Plaintiffs possess that would allow either theory to proceed against these Defendants 

by the Plaintiffs.

3. As such, the Plaintiffs are in violation of §627.4136, Florida Statutes, specifically 

prohibiting these Defendants to be made a part of a lawsuit in this State.

4. While there are countless ... literally, countless ... other pleading violations found in the 

Plaintiffs’ Complaint that violate many different pleading rules and regulations (which 

are not being waived by these Defendants), this very specific, and to the issue breach of a 

Statute, requires dismissal.

5. In addition, these Defendants have been required to obtain the services of the undersigned 

and are entitled to payment for all of their fees and costs in association with the 

presentation of this Motion and as such these Defendants demand entitlement to the 

recovery of the same from the Plaintiffs at a subsequent time when this Court can address 

those amounts.

6. Last, the entire Complaint is in violation of the Rules of Civil Procedure as to pleading 

requirements, their presentation, commingling of causes of actions, the pleading of 

irrelevant, immaterial and ultimately inadmissible allegations as set forth in Rules 1.110, 

Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 58 of 178
1.120, 1.130 and 1.150. As such it wholly without merit as to law or fact and should be 

dismissed.

WHEREFORE, these Defendants, Redwood Fire And Casualty Insurance Company, 

National Indemnity Insurance, and Berkshire Hathaway Homestate Companies, 

respectfully request from this Court an Order Dismissing the Plaintiffs’ Complaint, and any other 

relief this Court deems just and proper. 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing has been furnished to Marcelle 

Ann Angall-Leonce and Romanus Sylvester Leonce, Via U.S.Mail to: 2614 Grapevine CRST, 

Ocoee, FL 34761 in this 23rd day of September, 2019. 

FERNANDEZ TRIAL LAWYERS, P.A.

/s/ Ellis .T. Fernandez, III_______________

ELLIS T. FERNANDEZ, III, ESQ. 

Florida Bar No. 371556

JOHN M. HOWELL, ESQ.

Florida Bar No. 243027

8780-200 Perimeter Park Court

Jacksonville, Florida 32216

(904) 398-8008 (Phone)

(904) 398-0332 (Fax)

Attorneys for Defendants

Primary Email: Pleadings@FernandezTL.com

Secondary Email: Jhowell@FernandezTL.com

 rbaker@fernandeztl.com

Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 59 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 60 of 178
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, 

EIGHTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, 

IN AND FOR ALACHUA 

COUNTY, FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 2019-CA-2558

MARCELLE ANN ANGALL-LEONCE and

ROMANUS SYLVESTER LEONCE, 

husband and wife, 

Plaintiffs,

vs.

ON POINT TRANSPORT, 

REDWOOD FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,

NATIONAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE, 

BERKSHIRE HATHAWY HOMESTATE COMPANIES, 

JOSEPH MISATULI LEIA, CJ HESTER INC.

and LARRY E. POWERS, JR.,

Defendants.

____________________________________/

DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF HEARING

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on Friday, October 11, 2019, at 3:00 p.m. or as 

soon thereafter as counsel may be heard, the undersigned will call up for hearing and 

disposition by the Honorable Donna Keim, in chambers at Alachua County Courthouse, 

Room 416, 201 E University Avenue, Gainesville, Florida 32601, on the following:

Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 61 of 178
1. Defendant’s, Redwood fire and Casualty Insurance Company, National 

Indemnity Insurance and Berkshire Hathaway Homestate Companies

Motion to Dismiss.

(15 Minutes Have Been Reserved)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing has been furnished to 

Marcelle Ann Angall-Leonce and Romanus Sylvester Leonce, Via U.S.Mail to: 2614 

Grapevine CRST, Ocoee, FL 34761 in this 24th day of September, 2019. 

FERNANDEZ TRIAL LAWYERS, P.A.

/s/ Ellis .T. Fernandez, III_______________

ELLIS T. FERNANDEZ, III, ESQ. 

Florida Bar No. 371556

JOHN M. HOWELL, ESQ.

Florida Bar No. 243027

8780-200 Perimeter Park Court

Jacksonville, Florida 32216

(904) 398-8008 (Phone)

(904) 398-0332 (Fax)

Attorneys for Defendants

Primary Email: Pleadings@FernandezTL.com 

Secondary Email: Jhowell@FernandezTL.com

 rbaker@fernandeztl.com

Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 62 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 63 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 64 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 65 of 178
Filing # 96424633 E-Filed 09/27/2019 02:45:05 PM Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 66 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 67 of 178
Filing # 96424633 E-Filed 09/27/2019 02:45:05 PM Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 68 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 69 of 178
Filing # 96424633 E-Filed 09/27/2019 02:45:05 PM Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 70 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 71 of 178
Filing # 96424633 E-Filed 09/27/2019 02:45:05 PM Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 72 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 73 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 74 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 75 of 178
Filing # 96424633 E-Filed 09/27/2019 02:45:05 PM Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 76 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 77 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 78 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 79 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 80 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 81 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 82 of 178
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT

OF THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT

IN AND FOR ALACHUA COUNTY, FLORIDA

MARCELLE ANN ANGALL-LEONCE and CASE NO.: 01-2019-CA-2558

ROMANUS SYLVESTER LEONCE, DIVISION: J

husband and wife, 

Plaintiffs,

vs.

ON POINT TRANSPORT, 

REDWOOD FIRE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,

NATIONAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE, 

BERKSHIRE HATHAWY HOMESTATE COMPANIES, 

JOSEPH MISATULI LEIA, CJ HESTER INC.

and LARRY E. POWERS, JR.,

Defendants.

__________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ REDWOOD FIRE AND CASUALTY

INSURANCE COMPANY, NATIONAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE, 

AND BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESTATE COMPANIES’

MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

THIS MATTER came on to be heard before this Court on October 11, 2019, in

Chambers, on the Defendants’, Redwood Fire and Casualty Insurance Company, National

Indemnity Insurance, and Berkshire Hathaway Homestate Companies Motion to Dismiss, and

the Court, after hearing the argument of counsel, and otherwise being advised, it is,

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is hereby GRANTED WITH PREJUDICE.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at the Alachua County Courthouse, Gainesville,

Florida this Monday, October 21, 2019.

Filing # 97636953 E-Filed 10/22/2019 08:02:50 AM Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 83 of 178
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was

furnished to the below parties by E-Portal on this Tuesday, October 22, 2019: 

JOSEPH MISATULI LEIA

12937 ROAD 35 1-2

MADERA, CA 93636

Ellis T. Fernandez III

pleadings@fernandeztl.com

et@fernandeztl.com

TGurganus@fernandeztl.com

John Moffitt Howell

jhowell@fernandeztl.com

klang-thorbs@fernandeztl.com

pleadings@fernandeztl.com

Larry Edward Powers Jr

ppilawfirm@aol.com

Marcelle Ann Angall-Leonce

leoncesyl@aol.com

Romanus Sylvester Leonce

leoncesy101@yahoo.com

Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 84 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 85 of 178
Filing # 99146602 E-Filed 11/19/2019 07:55:49 PM Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 86 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 87 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 88 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 89 of 178
IN THE Circuit Civil COURT OF THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT

IN AND FOR ALACHUA COUNTY, FLORIDA

CASE NO.: _01-2019-CA-002558

_____Marcelle Ann Angall-Leonce, Romanus Sylvester Leonce______,

Plaintiff/Petitioner,

v.

__________________On Point Transport Inc., et al_____,

Defendant/Respondent.

NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION WITHIN COURT FILING

Pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420(d)(2),

( )(1) I am filing herewith a document containing confidential information as described in Rule 2.420(d)(1)(B) and that:

(a) The title/type of document is: ____________________________________________________________, and:

(b) (X ) the entire document is confidential, or

( ) the confidential information within the document is precisely located at: _____________________________.

OR

( )(2) A document was previously filed in this case that contains confidential information as described in Rule

2.420(d)(1)(B), but a Notice of Confidential Information within Court Filing was not filed with the document and the

confidential information was not maintained as confidential by the clerk of the court. I hereby notify the clerk that

this confidential information is located as follows:

(a) Title/type of document: _____________________________________________________________________;

(b) Date of filing (if known): ______________________________________________________________________;

(c) Date of document: ____________________;

(d) Docket entry number: ____________________;

(e) ( ) Entire document is confidential, or

( ) Precise location of confidential information in document: ________________________________________.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of the foregoing was furnished by (e-mail) (delivery) (mail) (fax) on _______________,

2019____, to (All Parties and Affected Non-Parties. Note: If the name or address of a Party or Affected Non-Party is

confidential DO NOT include such information in this Certificate of Service. Instead, serve the State Attorney or

request Court Service. See Rule 2.420(k)): _____________________________________________________________.

Attorney Name

Address

Phone

Florida Bar No.

Email address

Note: The clerk of court shall review filings identified as containing confidential information to determine whether the

information is facially subject to confidentiality under the identified provision. The clerk shall notify the filer in writing

within 5 days if the clerk determines that the information is NOT subject to confidentiality, and the records shall not be held

as confidential for more than 10 days, unless a motion is filed pursuant to subdivision (d)(3) of the Rule. Fla. R. Jud. Admin.

2.420(d)(2).

Filing # 99146602 E-Filed 11/19/2019 07:55:49 PM Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 90 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 91 of 178
Filing # 99146602 E-Filed 11/19/2019 07:55:49 PM Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 92 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 93 of 178
IN THE ___________ COURT OF THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT

IN AND FOR ALACHUA COUNTY, FLORIDA

, 

Plaintiff, Case No.:

-vs- Division: 

, 

Defendant.

SUMMONS / PERSONAL SERVICE OF AN INDIVIDUAL

THE STATE OF FLORIDA:

TO EACH SHERIFF OF THE STATE: You are hereby commanded to serve this Summons and a copy of the 

Complaint or Petition in this action on the Defendant:

Dated on . 

J. K. "Jess" Irby, Esq.

Clerk of the Circuit Court

by:

Deputy Clerk

Alachua County Courthouse

201 E. University Ave

Gainesville FL 32601

IMPORTANT

A lawsuit has been filed against you. You have 20 calendar days after this summons is served on you to file a 

written response to the attached complaint with the Clerk of this Court. A phone call will not protect you. Your 

written response, including the case number given above and the names of the parties, must be filed if you want 

the court to hear your side of the case. If you do not file your response on time, you may lose the case, and your 

wages, money, and property may thereafter be taken without further warning from the court. There are other 

legal requirements. You may want to call an attorney right away. If you do not know an attorney, you may call 

an attorney referral service or a legal aid office (listed in the phone book).

If you choose to file a written response yourself, at the same time you file your written response to the court 

you must also mail or take a copy of your written response to the "Plaintiff/Plaintiff's Attorney" named below.

Plaintiff/Plaintiff's Attorney

Address

Florida Bar Number

Filing # 99146602 E-Filed 11/19/2019 07:55:49 PM Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 94 of 178
IMPORTANTE

Usted ha sido demandado legalmente. Tiene 20 días, contados a partir del recibo de esta 

notificación, para contestar la demanda adjunta, por escrito, y presentarla ante este tribunal. 

Una llamada telefónica no lo protegerá. Si usted desea que el tribunal considere su defensa, 

debe presentar su respuesta por escrito, incluyendo el número del caso y los nombres de las 

partes interesadas. Si usted no contesta la demanda a tiempo, pudiese perder el caso y podría

ser despojado de sus ingresos y propiedades, o privado de sus derechos, sin previo aviso del 

tribunal. Existen otros requisitos legales. Si lo desea, puede usted consultar a un abogado 

inmediatamente. Si no conoce a un abogado, puede llamar a una de las oficinas de asistencia 

legal que aparecen en la guía telefónica. 

Si desea responder a la demanda por su cuenta, al mismo tiempo en que presenta su respuesta 

ante el tribunal, deberá usted enviar por correo o entregar una copia de su respuesta a la 

persona denominada abajo como “Plaintiff/Plaintiff ’s Attorney” (Demandante o Abogado del 

Demandante).

IMPORTANT

Des poursuites judiciaires ont été entreprises contre vous. Vous avez 20 jours consécutifs a 

partir de la date de l'assignation de cette citation pour déposer une réponse écrite a la plainte 

ci-jointe auprès de ce tribunal. Un simple coup de téléphone est insuffisant pour vous protéger. 

Vous êtes obliges de déposer votre réponse écrite, avec mention du numéro de dossier cidessus et du nom des parties nommées ici, si vous souhaitez que le tribunal entende votre 

cause. Si vous ne déposez pas votre réponse écrite dans le relai requis, vous risquez de perdre 

la cause ainsi que votre salaire, votre argent, et vos biens peuvent être saisis par la suite, sans 

aucun préavis ultérieur du tribunal. Il y a d'autres obligations juridiques et vous pouvez requérir 

les services immédiats d'un avocat. Si vous ne connaissez pas d'avocat, vous pourriez 

téléphoner a un service de référence d'avocats ou a un bureau d'assistance juridique (figurant à 

l'annuaire de téléphones).

Si vous choisissez de déposer vous-même une réponse écrite, il vous faudra également, en 

même temps que cette formalité, faire parvenir ou expédier une copie de votre réponse écrite

au "Plaintiff/ Plaintiff ’s Attorney" (Plaignant ou à son avocat) nomme ci-dessous. 

Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 95 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 96 of 178
Filing # 99146602 E-Filed 11/19/2019 07:55:49 PM Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 97 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 98 of 178
Filing # 99445501 E-Filed 11/25/2019 10:26:53 PM Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 99 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 100 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 101 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 102 of 178
Filing # 99445501 E-Filed 11/25/2019 10:26:53 PM Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 103 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 104 of 178
IN THE ___________ COURT OF THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT

IN AND FOR ALACHUA COUNTY, FLORIDA

, 

Plaintiff, Case No.:

-vs- Division: 

, 

Defendant.

SUMMONS / PERSONAL SERVICE OF AN INDIVIDUAL

THE STATE OF FLORIDA:

TO EACH SHERIFF OF THE STATE: You are hereby commanded to serve this Summons and a copy of the 

Complaint or Petition in this action on the Defendant:

Dated on . 

J. K. "Jess" Irby, Esq.

Clerk of the Circuit Court

by:

Deputy Clerk

Alachua County Courthouse

201 E. University Ave

Gainesville FL 32601

IMPORTANT

A lawsuit has been filed against you. You have 20 calendar days after this summons is served on you to file a 

written response to the attached complaint with the Clerk of this Court. A phone call will not protect you. Your 

written response, including the case number given above and the names of the parties, must be filed if you want 

the court to hear your side of the case. If you do not file your response on time, you may lose the case, and your 

wages, money, and property may thereafter be taken without further warning from the court. There are other 

legal requirements. You may want to call an attorney right away. If you do not know an attorney, you may call 

an attorney referral service or a legal aid office (listed in the phone book).

If you choose to file a written response yourself, at the same time you file your written response to the court 

you must also mail or take a copy of your written response to the "Plaintiff/Plaintiff's Attorney" named below.

Plaintiff/Plaintiff's Attorney

Address

Florida Bar Number

Marcelle A Angall-Leonce,Romanus SLeonce 

Circuit County

01-2019-CA-002558

On Point Transport Inc, et al

Longwood, FL 32779

505 Wekiva Springs Road, Suite 300

Powers Personal Injury Law Firm

Larry E. Powers, Jr.

Filing # 99445501 E-Filed 11/25/2019 10:26:53 PM Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 105 of 178
IMPORTANTE

Usted ha sido demandado legalmente. Tiene 20 días, contados a partir del recibo de esta 

notificación, para contestar la demanda adjunta, por escrito, y presentarla ante este tribunal. 

Una llamada telefónica no lo protegerá. Si usted desea que el tribunal considere su defensa, 

debe presentar su respuesta por escrito, incluyendo el número del caso y los nombres de las 

partes interesadas. Si usted no contesta la demanda a tiempo, pudiese perder el caso y podría

ser despojado de sus ingresos y propiedades, o privado de sus derechos, sin previo aviso del 

tribunal. Existen otros requisitos legales. Si lo desea, puede usted consultar a un abogado 

inmediatamente. Si no conoce a un abogado, puede llamar a una de las oficinas de asistencia 

legal que aparecen en la guía telefónica. 

Si desea responder a la demanda por su cuenta, al mismo tiempo en que presenta su respuesta 

ante el tribunal, deberá usted enviar por correo o entregar una copia de su respuesta a la 

persona denominada abajo como “Plaintiff/Plaintiff ’s Attorney” (Demandante o Abogado del 

Demandante).

IMPORTANT

Des poursuites judiciaires ont été entreprises contre vous. Vous avez 20 jours consécutifs a 

partir de la date de l'assignation de cette citation pour déposer une réponse écrite a la plainte 

ci-jointe auprès de ce tribunal. Un simple coup de téléphone est insuffisant pour vous protéger. 

Vous êtes obliges de déposer votre réponse écrite, avec mention du numéro de dossier cidessus et du nom des parties nommées ici, si vous souhaitez que le tribunal entende votre 

cause. Si vous ne déposez pas votre réponse écrite dans le relai requis, vous risquez de perdre 

la cause ainsi que votre salaire, votre argent, et vos biens peuvent être saisis par la suite, sans 

aucun préavis ultérieur du tribunal. Il y a d'autres obligations juridiques et vous pouvez requérir 

les services immédiats d'un avocat. Si vous ne connaissez pas d'avocat, vous pourriez 

téléphoner a un service de référence d'avocats ou a un bureau d'assistance juridique (figurant à 

l'annuaire de téléphones).

Si vous choisissez de déposer vous-même une réponse écrite, il vous faudra également, en 

même temps que cette formalité, faire parvenir ou expédier une copie de votre réponse écrite

au "Plaintiff/ Plaintiff ’s Attorney" (Plaignant ou à son avocat) nomme ci-dessous. 

Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 106 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 107 of 178
Filing # 99445501 E-Filed 11/25/2019 10:26:53 PM Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 108 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 109 of 178
Filing # 99445501 E-Filed 11/25/2019 10:26:53 PM Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 110 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 111 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 112 of 178
Filing # 99445501 E-Filed 11/25/2019 10:26:53 PM Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 113 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 114 of 178
Filing # 99713249 E-Filed 12/03/2019 02:07:18 PM Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 115 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 116 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 117 of 178
Filing # 99765417 E-Filed 12/04/2019 11:00:22 AM Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 118 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 119 of 178
December 5, 2019

Case #: 01-2019-CA-002558

Plaintifs : Marcelle A Angall-Leonce, et al,

Défendant: On Point Transportation Inc. et al.,

To Clerk of Court: Re: Corrected Summons for Joseph M. Leia

The summons issued on 12/4/19 for Joseph Misatuli Leia was not issued because the individual

has two possible addresses. The 2020 Young Street Apt 102 Selma, CA 93662 and the 8633 E

Manning Ave Selma, CA 93662. Therefore, the summons was corrected and resubmitted.

Corrected summons atttached

Filing # 99910028 E-Filed 12/06/2019 11:10:02 AM Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 120 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 121 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 122 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 123 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 124 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 125 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 126 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 127 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 128 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 129 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 130 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 131 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 132 of 178
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, EIGHTH 

JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR 

ALACHUA COUNTY, FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 2019-CA-2558

MARCELLE ANN ANGALL-LEONCE 

and ROMANUS SYLVESTER LEONCE, 

Plaintiffs,

vs.

ON POINT TRANSPORT, JOSEPH 

MISATULI LEIA, CJ HESTER, INC.

and LARRY E. POWERS, Jr.

Defendants.

____________________________________/

MOTION FOR SPECIAL APPEARANCE TO QUASH SERVICE OF PROCESS AND 

TO DISMISS FOR INSUFFICIENT SERVICE OF PROCESS

COME NOW the undersigned counsel, and hereby makes this special appearance, on 

behalf of ON POINT TRANSPORT, INC., without waiving any other possible or available 

defenses, rights, privileges, or any ability to further respond to the Amended Complaint pending 

resolution of these issues as the undersigned makes this special and exceptional appearance, and 

hereby moves to quash the service of process and to dismiss this action for insufficient service 

and in support thereof states:

RELEVANT FACTS

1. On July 26, 2019, Plaintiffs filed their initial Complaint alleging personal injuries 

reportedly sustained in a motor vehicle collision on July 26, 2015; and a Summons was issued to 

ON POINT TRANSPORT, INC, a foreign corporation.

Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 133 of 178
Leonce v. On Point Transport, et. Al.

Case No. 2019-CA-2558 

Page 2 of 5

2. On September 27, 2019, Plaintiffs filed the Return of Summons Unserved on ON 

POINT TRANSPORT, INC.

3. On November 19, 2019 and November 25, 2019, Plaintiffs filed an Amended 

Complaint alleging negligence against ON POINT TRANSPORT, INC. and others; and 

Summons were, again, issued to ON POINT TRANSPORT.

4. On December 30, 2019, Plaintiffs filed a Return of Service for ON POINT 

TRANSPORT, INC, a foreign corporation. See Exhibit A.

5. Plaintiff’s Return of Service includes a “Declaration of Diligence” that notes the 

Deputy’s attempt to serve ON POINT TRANSPORT, INC. on 12/16/2019 at 5:54 pm with the 

remark of “subject not home”. Yet, Plaintiffs’ Return of Service purports to reflect a 

“substituted service” for ON POINT TRANSPORT, INC. (one minute later) at 5:55pm by 

leaving the Summons and Complaint with “Sharon Dosanjh – Spouse”.

6. The Return of Service does not indicate who Sharon Dosanjh is the spouse of, or 

what this unknown person’s relationship to ON POINT TRANSPORT, INC.

7. Plaintiff’s Return of Service for ON POINT TRANSPORT, INC’s does not 

document service on the corporation’s Registered Agent or an appropriate officer or agent.

ARGUMENT

I. Return Of Service Is Invalid On Its Face And Should Be Quashed.

8. The burden is on the Plaintiffs to show that service of process was sufficient. A 

return of service serves as prima facie evidence that service was validly performed. Where a 

return of service is invalid on it face, the return of service cannot be relied on as evidence that 

service of process was valid. Re-employment Servs., Ltd. v. Nat'l Loan Acquisitions Co., 969 

So.2d 467, 471 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007).

Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 134 of 178
Leonce v. On Point Transport, et. Al.

Case No. 2019-CA-2558 

Page 3 of 5

9. Here, the return of service establishes that Plaintiffs effected service on a foreign 

corporation through “substituted service” by delivering the documents to “Sharon Dosanjh –

Spouse”. The Return of Service does not state who Sharon Dosanjh is the spouse of, or what 

relationship this unknown persons has with ON POINT TRANSPORT, INC.

10. Under Florida law, service of process on a corporation can only be made on a 

representative or agent of the corporation designated by law. Florida Statutes Sec. 48.081, and 

48.091 provide the exclusive means for service on an active corporation, and these provisions are 

to be strictly construed. Dade Erection Service v. Sims Crane Service, 379 So.2d 423, 426 (Fla. 

2d DCA 1980).

11. Strict compliance with Sec. 48.081 requires that "a return which shows service 

upon an inferior officer or agent must demonstrate that all members of a superior class could not 

first be served. This is a condition precedent to validity of service on a member of an inferior 

class." Dade Erection Service, 379 So.2d at 425. Service that does not strictly comply with the 

requirements of Sec. 48.081(1), showing a diligent search for superior officers or the necessity 

for substitute service, must be quashed. S.T.R. Industries, Inc. v. Hidalgo Corp., 832 So.2d 262, 

264 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002).

II. Plaintiff’s Failed to Comply with Rule 1.070(j)

12. The law is settled that plaintiffs have 120 days to serve process on the 

defendant(s). Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.070(j); and see generally, Morales v. Sperry Rand, 601 So.2d 538 

(Fla. 1992) (upholding trial court’s dismissal of action where no good cause shown for failure to 

obtain service within 120 days after filing complaint). 

Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 135 of 178
Leonce v. On Point Transport, et. Al.

Case No. 2019-CA-2558 

Page 4 of 5

13. In the instant matter, Plaintiffs filed their Complaint initiating this action on July 

26, 2019. Thus, Plaintiffs had until Monday, November 25, 2019 to perfect service on ON 

POINT TRANSPORT, INC. 

14. Plaintiffs cannot show good cause for their failure to meet the statutory timeframe 

for service of process on ON POINT TRANSPORT, INC. In the October 11, 2019 hearing on 

Defendants’ Redwood Fire and Casualty Insurance Company, National Indemnity Insurance, and 

Berkshire Hathaway Homestate Companies’ Motion to Dismiss, this Court brought to the 

Plaintiffs’ attention that ON POINT TRANSPORT had not yet been served, and warned the 

Plaintiffs of the looming 120-day deadline. Nevertheless, and despite the foregoing, the 

Plaintiffs failed to meet the procedural requirements for effecting service on ON POINT 

TRANSPORT, INC., and did not seek to obtain an extension of time to obtain service of process. 

15. The Return of Service that Plaintiff’s have provided is facially invalid; and 

Plaintiff’s are outside the timeframe permitted by 1.070(j) Florida Rules of Civil Procedure to 

effect service on ON POINT TRANSPORT, INC. 

16. Accordingly, and therefore, the Plaintiff’s Service of Process on ON POINT 

TRANSPORT, INC. should be quashed, and the action against ON POINT TRANSPORT, INC. 

dismissed with prejudice.

WHEREFORE, the undersigned, making a special appearance on behalf of ON POINT 

TRANSPORT, INC., respectfully requests from this Honorable Court the entry of an Order

quashing Plaintiffs’ service of process, dismissing Plaintiff’s claims against ON POINT 

TRANSPORT, INC. for insufficient service and any other relief this Court deems just and 

proper. 

Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 136 of 178
Leonce v. On Point Transport, et. Al.

Case No. 2019-CA-2558 

Page 5 of 5

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true copy of the foregoing has been furnished to 

MARCELLE ANN ANGALL-LEONCE and ROMANUS SYLVESTER LEONCE, via 

electronic service to leoncesyl@aol.com and leoncesy101@yahoo.com; and via U.S. mail to 560 

Bay Grove Road, Loganville, GA 30052 in this 6th day of January, 2020. 

FERNANDEZ TRIAL LAWYERS, P.A.

/s/ DeAnna M. Golphin

ELLIS T. FERNANDEZ, III, ESQ. 

Florida Bar No. 371556

JOHN M. HOWELL, ESQ.

Florida Bar No. 243027

DEANNA M. GOLPHIN, ESQ.

8780-200 Perimeter Park Court

Jacksonville, Florida 32216

(904) 398-8008 (Phone)

(904) 398-0332 (Fax)

Attorneys for Defendants

Primary Email: Pleadings@FernandezTL.com

Secondary Email: kLang-Thorbs@FernandezTL.com

Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 137 of 178
Exhibit	A

Plaintiff’s	Return	of	Service	for	

On	Point	Transport,	Inc.

(E-Filed	12/30/2019)

Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 138 of 178
Filing # 100924821 E-Filed 12/30/2019 01:26:18 PM Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 139 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 140 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 141 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 142 of 178
Filing # 101586531 E-Filed 01/13/2020 07:26:20 PM Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 143 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 144 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 145 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 146 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 147 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 148 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 149 of 178
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTH

JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR 

ALACHUA COUNTY, FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 01-2019-CA-002558

MARCELLE ANN ANGALL-LEONCE and

ROMANUS SYLVESTER LEONCE, 

Plaintiffs, 

vs.

ON POINT TRANSPORT, INC., JOSEPH

MISATULI LEIA, CJ HESTER, INC., and

LARRY E. POWERS, JR., 

Defendants.

___________________________________/

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

COMES NOW the Plaintiffs, MARCELLE ANN ANGALL-LEONCE and ROMANUS

SYLVESTER LEONCE , by and through undersigned counsel, pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil 

Procedure, 1.190 (b), hereby request permission to file a Second Amended Complaint (attached), 

and in support thereof the following would be shown: 

1. On July 26, 2019, Plaintiffs originally filed a pro se negligence Complaint against

Defendants, ON POINT TRANSPORT, INC., REDWOOD FIRE AND

CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, NATIONAL INDEMNITY

INSURANCE, BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESTATE COMPANIES,

JOSEPH MISATULI LEIA, CJ HESTER, INC., and LARRY E. POWERS, JR.

2. On September 23, 2019, Defendants, REDWOOD FIRE AND CASUALTY

INSURANCE COMPANY, NATIONAL INDEMNITY INSURANCE, and

BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESTATE COMPANIES, moved to dismiss

Filing # 102631065 E-Filed 02/03/2020 11:51:08 AM Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 150 of 178
Angall-Leonce and Leonce vs. On Point Transport, etal

CASE NO: 2019-CA-002558

2 | P a g e

Plaintiffs’ Complaint and a hearing was held on October 11, 2019 before the 

Honorable Judge Donna Keim. 

3. On October 21, 2019, the Court granted Defendants’, REDWOOD FIRE AND 

CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, NATIONAL INDEMNITY 

INSURANCE, and BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY HOMESTATE COMPANIES’ 

Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice.

4. On November 19, 2019 and November 25, 2019, Plaintiffs filed Amended 

Complaints for Damages, which are identical but for the removal of the insurance 

carriers from the caption of the pleadings pursuant to the Order Granting 

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. 

5. Based on review, Defendant corporation, ON POINT TRANSPORT, INC., is 

currently suspended and the corporation invalid. The listed address for the 

registered agent Gursharan Dosanjh, moved from 5588 W. Paul Avenue, Fresno, 

CA 93732 to 12937 Road 35 1⁄2, Madera, CA 93636, and is no longer valid. 

6. ON POINT TRANSPORT, INC. was served via substitute service on the registered 

agent’s spouse, Sharon Dosanjh, at their residence on December 16, 2019 via 

service of process by a California sheriff; however the Defendant has filed a Motion 

to Quash Service of Process alleging that the service return does not specifically 

state that Sharon Dosanjh is the spouse of the registered agent, Gursharan Dosanjh, 

and that the service was outside the time limit of Florida Rules of Civil Procedure,

1.070(j).

7. The Plaintiff did make diligent efforts to serve the complaint on various dates. 

Furthermore, where the statute of limitations has run subsequent to the complaint 

Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 151 of 178
Angall-Leonce and Leonce vs. On Point Transport, etal

CASE NO: 2019-CA-002558

3 | P a g e

being filed but before valid service, the trial court should extend time for service of 

process. Mitschke-Collande v. Skipworth, 201 So.3d 660 (Fla. 3rd DCA 2016). See 

also Sly v. McKeithen, 27 So. 3d 86 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009).

8. This case is not currently scheduled for Trial, and this case has not yet been 

mediated. 

9. The undersigned was retained by Plaintiffs on January 27, 2020 and undersigned 

counsel filed his Notice of Appearance on January 27, 2020. 

10. Based on review of the evidence and the positions of the parties, Plaintiffs’ counsel 

believes it is appropriate to amend the Amended Complaint, which is in-artfully 

drafted, a typical characteristic of Pro Se Complaints. 

11. Defense has been contacted and has not agreed to the proposed amendment at 

present. A copy of the Second Amended Complaint is attached as Exhibit “A”.

12. This Complaint has been previously been amended.

13. This case has not previously been continued.

WHEREFORE, the Plaintiffs, MARCELLE ANN ANGALL-LEONCE and ROMANUS

SYLVESTER LEONCE, respectfully request that this Honorable Court grant the aforesaid relief, 

and for such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper. 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that this pleading has been efiled through the Florida Courts efiling 

portal to: Deanna M. Golphine, Esq., Fernandez Trial Lawyers, P.A., 8780-200 Perimeter Park 

Court, Jacksonville, FL 32216 at Pleadings@FernandezTL.com, kLangThorbs@FernandezTL.com; CJ Hester, Inc., at Jtrehern@hesterinc.net; Joseph Misatuli Leia, 

Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 152 of 178
Angall-Leonce and Leonce vs. On Point Transport, etal

CASE NO: 2019-CA-002558

4 | P a g e

12937 Road 35 1-2, Madera, CA 93636; and Larry E. Powers, Jr., 505 Wekiva Springs Road, Suite 

300, Longwood, FL 32779 at PPIlawfirm@aol.com, on this 3

rd day of February, 2020. 

Respectfully submitted,

FINE, FARKASH & PARLAPIANO, P.A.

622 Northeast First Street

Gainesville, Florida 32601

Telephone: 352-372-7777

Facsimile: 877-272-9101

BY: /s/ JACK J. FINE ESQ.

 JACK J. FINE, ESQ.

 Attorney for Plaintiff

 Florida Bar Number: 223700

Primary Email: jfine@ffplaw.com

Secondary Email: jduchaj@ffplaw.com

Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 153 of 178
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE EIGHTH

JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR 

ALACHUA COUNTY, FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 01-2019-CA-002558 

MARCELLE ANN ANGALL-LEONCE and

ROMANUS SYLVESTER LEONCE, 

Plaintiffs, 

vs.

ON POINT TRANSPORT, INC., JOSEPH

MISATULI LEIA, CJ HESTER, INC., and

LARRY E. POWERS, JR., 

Defendants.

___________________________________/

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

COME NOW the Plaintiffs, MARCELLE ANN ANGALL-LEONCE AND ROMANUS 

SYLVESTER LEONCE, and sues Defendants, JOSEPH MISATULI LEIA, and ON POINT 

TRANSPORT, INC., and would allege the following:

1. This is an action for damages in excess of Thirty Thousand Dollars ($30,000.00),

exclusive of costs and interest.

2. At the time of the crash, Plaintiffs, MARCELLE ANN ANGALL-LEONCE AND

ROMANUS SYLVESTER LEONCE, were residents of Ocoee, Orange County, Florida. 

3. Plaintiffs, MARCELLE ANN ANGALL-LEONCE AND ROMANUS

SYLVESTER LEONCE, are currently residents of Loganville, Gwinnett County, Georgia.

4. At all times relevant Defendant, JOSEPH MISATULI LEIA, was a resident of

Selma, Fresno County, California. 

5. At all times relevant Defendant, ON POINT TRANSPORT, INC., was a California

profit corporation, operating and doing business in the State of California and the State of Florida, 

EXHIBIT "A"

Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 154 of 178
Marcelle Angall-Leonce v. On Point Transport, Inc., etal

Case No.: 19-CA-002558

2 | P a g e

with a mailing address at 5588 W. Paul Avenue, Fresno, CA 93722, and Registered Agent listed 

as Gursharan Dosanjh, located at 5588 W. Paul Avenue, Fresno, CA 93722. 

6. On or about July 26, 2015, Defendant, JOSEPH MISATULI LEIA, operated the

motor vehicle owned by Defendant, ON POINT TRANSPORT, INC., to wit: a 2010 White Freight 

Truck, bearing license plate number WP55069, and VIN#1FUJBBCK7ADAG5680 on State Road 

93 (I-75) northbound at MM372 at or near its intersection with County Road 318, in Micanopy, 

Alachua County, Florida. 

7. At that time and place, the Defendant, JOSEPH MISATULI LEIA, negligently and 

tortiously operated the motor vehicle owned by Defendant, ON POINT TRANSPORT, INC., so 

that it collided with the vehicle that Plaintiff, ROMANUS SYLVESTER LEONCE, was driving, 

and Plaintiff, MARCELLE ANN ANGALL-LEONCE, was the passenger. 

FACTS REGARDING DEFENDANT ON POINT TRANSPORT, INC.’S ROLE

IN INTERSTATE COMMERCE

8. The transportation of goods in interstate commerce constitutes an ultra-hazardous 

activity that presents substantial dangers to the driving public when not done safely, properly, and 

with due caution. Accordingly, there are a number of federal regulations, state statutes, industry 

standards and local ordinances that govern the qualification, training and retention of professional 

tractor trailer drivers, the proper maintenance and equipment for commercial motor vehicles, and 

the safe operation of motor carriers, commercial motor vehicles and professional truck drivers. 

9. At all times material hereto, Defendant ON POINT TRANSPORT, INC. was an 

interstate motor carrier authorized to transport goods in interstate commerce and in the State of 

Florida for profit pursuant to one or more permits issued by the Interstate Commerce Commission, 

or by the United States Department of Transportation (“USDOT”), or both. Accordingly, 

Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 155 of 178
Marcelle Angall-Leonce v. On Point Transport, Inc., etal

Case No.: 19-CA-002558

3 | P a g e

Defendant ON POINT TRANSPORT, INC. was subject to all state and federal laws, statutes, 

regulations, and industry standards governing the hiring of safe and qualified commercial drivers, 

the safe maintenance and operation of commercial motor vehicles, and the safe brokering of goods 

in interstate commerce, including without limitation the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations 

(“FMCSRs”).

10. In return for the privilege to operate commercial motor vehicles on the public 

highways transporting goods in interstate commerce, motor carriers like Defendant ON POINT 

TRANSPORT, INC. must take certain safety related certifications and verifications to the United 

States Department of Transportation. In order to obtain operating authority and get a USDOT 

Number, Defendant ON POINT TRANSPORT, INC. had to submit a Form OP-1 Application for 

Motor Property Carrier and Broker Authority or equivalent. Defendant ON POINT TRANSPORT, 

INC. had to submit a similar application with the same certifications to obtain authority to operate 

as a Broker of goods in interstate commerce. 

11. Each Form OP-1 submitted contained a “Safety Certification”, certifying to the 

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (“FMCSA”) that Defendant ON POINT 

TRANSPORT, INC. has access to and is familiar with all applicable US DOT regulations relating 

to the safe operation of commercial motor vehicles and that Defendant ON POINT TRANSPORT, 

INC. will comply with the FMCSRs at all times while operating a commercial motor vehicle in 

the United States. 

12. More specifically, each Form OP-1 submitted contained a “Safety Certification”, 

certifying to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration that, at a minimum, Defendant ON 

POINT TRANSPORT, INC.:

Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 156 of 178
Marcelle Angall-Leonce v. On Point Transport, Inc., etal

Case No.: 19-CA-002558

4 | P a g e

i. Had and will have in place a system and an individual responsible for ensuring 

overall compliance with the FMCSRs; 

ii. Had and will have in place a driver safety training/orientation program; 

iii. Had and will have prepared and maintained an accident register; 

iv. Is familiar with DOT regulations governing driver qualifications and had an will 

have in place a system for overseeing driver qualification requirements; 

v. Had and will have in place policies and procedures consistent with DOT regulations 

governing driving and operational safety of motor vehicles, including drivers’ 

hours of service and vehicle inspection, repair, and maintenance; and 

vi. Must comply with all pertinent Federal, State, local and tribal statutory and 

regulatory requirements when operating within the United States. 

13. Upon information and belief, representatives of Defendant ON POINT 

TRANSPORT, INC. swore under penalty of perjury to comply with the above “Safety 

Certifications.” 

FACTS REGARDING DEFENDANT JOSEPH MISATULI LEIA

AND ON POINT TRANSPORT, INC.

14. At all relevant times, Defendant JOSEPH MISATULI LEIA was a Class A licensed 

motor vehicle operator driving a 2010 White Freight Truck Tractor-Trailer bearing license plate 

number WP55069. Accordingly, Defendant JOSEPH MISATULI LEIA was subject to all state 

and federal laws, statutes, regulations and industry standards governing the safe maintenance and 

operation of commercial motor vehicles and tandem trailers including, without limitation, the 

FMCSRs set forth in 49 C.F.R. parts 350-398. 

Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 157 of 178
Marcelle Angall-Leonce v. On Point Transport, Inc., etal

Case No.: 19-CA-002558

5 | P a g e

15. At all relevant times, the Semi was owned by Defendant ON POINT 

TRANSPORT, INC. and was being operated by Defendant JOSEPH MISATULI LEIA with 

Defendant ON POINT TRANSPORT, INC.’s consent, for the benefit of and/or pursuant to a 

contract with Defendant. 

16. At all relevant times, Defendant JOSEPH MISATULI LEIA was operating a 

commercial motor vehicle for Defendant ON POINT TRANSPORT, INC. and was subject to ON 

POINT TRANSPORT, INC.’s control or right to control such that ON POINT TRANSPORT, 

INC. should be considered their employer and therefore vicariously liable for the negligence of 

Defendant JOSEPH MISATULI LEIA. 

17. Accordingly, Defendants ON POINT TRANSPORT, INC., and JOSEPH 

MISATULI LEIA are personally liable, jointly and severely, in partnership, joint venture, or sole 

proprietorship for the crash and resulting permanent injuries and damages suffered by Plaintiffs, 

MARCELLE ANN ANGALL-LEONCE AND ROMANUS SYLVESTER LEONCE, claimed 

herein. 

18. Each Defendant acted in a manner that either alone or combined and concurring 

with the actions of other Defendants’ acts of negligence, directly and proximately caused the 

incident and the resulting injuries to the Plaintiffs, MARCELLE ANN ANGALL-LEONCE AND 

ROMANUS SYLVESTER LEONCE. 

COUNT I: NEGLIGENCE

AGAINST DEFENDANT, JOSEPH MISATULI LEIA

Plaintiffs, MARCELLE ANN ANGALL-LEONCE AND ROMANUS SYLVESTER 

LEONCE, re-allege those allegations contained within 1 through 18 above and incorporate them 

herein by this reference. 

Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 158 of 178
Marcelle Angall-Leonce v. On Point Transport, Inc., etal

Case No.: 19-CA-002558

6 | P a g e

19. Defendant, JOSEPH MISATULI LEIA, improperly and negligently operated the 

vehicle owned and maintained by Defendant, ON POINT TRANSPORT, INC., breaching the duty 

owed to motorists like Plaintiffs, MARCELLE ANN ANGALL-LEONCE AND ROMANUS 

SYLVESTER LEONCE, violating the right of way of the Plaintiffs and negligently and tortiously 

operating the motor vehicle so that it collided with the vehicle that Plaintiff, MARCELLE ANN 

ANGALL-LEONCE, was driving, and Plaintiff, ROMANUS SYLVESTER LEONCE, was a 

passenger. 

20. As a direct and proximate cause of the negligence and/or recklessness of Defendant,

JOSEPH MISATULI LEIA, Plaintiff suffered permanent injuries. 

21. Plaintiffs, MARCELLE ANN ANGALL-LEONCE AND ROMANUS 

SYLVESTER LEONCE, were seriously and permanently injured in the crash caused by 

Defendant, JOSEPH MISATULI LEIA.

22. As a result of the negligence of the Defendant, JOSEPH MISATULI LEIA, the 

Plaintiffs, MARCELLE ANN ANGALL-LEONCE AND ROMANUS SYLVESTER LEONCE, 

suffered bodily injury and resulting pain and suffering, disability, disfigurement, mental anguish, 

loss of capacity for the enjoyment of life, expense of hospitalization, medical and nursing care and 

treatment, and loss of earnings, loss of ability to earn money and aggravation of a previously 

existing condition. Plaintiffs’ losses are either permanent or continuing in nature and Plaintiffs will 

suffer the losses in the future.

Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 159 of 178
Marcelle Angall-Leonce v. On Point Transport, Inc., etal

Case No.: 19-CA-002558

7 | P a g e

COUNT II: VICARIOUS LIABILITY AS OWNER AND FOR TORTS OF EMPLOYEE

AND/OR AGENT

AGAINST DEFENDANT ON POINT TRANSPORT, INC.

Plaintiffs MARCELLE ANN ANGALL-LEONCE AND ROMANUS SYLVESTER 

LEONCE re-allege those allegations contained within paragraphs 1 through 22 above and 

incorporate them herein by this reference. 

23. At all relevant times, Defendant, JOSEPH MISATULI LEIA, was Defendant, ON

POINT TRANSPORT, INC.’S, employee, statutory employee, and/or servant acting within the 

course and scope of his agency or employment, under the direct control and for the benefit of 

Defendant, ON POINT TRANSPORT, INC.

24. At all relevant times, Defendant, JOSEPH MISATULI LEIA, was Defendant, ON

POINT TRANSPORT, INC.’S, agent and/or independent contractor acting within the course and 

scope of his agency or employment, under the direct control and for the benefit of Defendant, ON 

POINT TRANSPORT, INC.

25. That at all times material to this Complaint, and in particular, at the time and place

of the subject automobile accident described herein, Defendant, JOSEPH MISATULI LEIA, was 

driving the motor vehicle with the implied and/or expressed consent and permission of Defendant, 

ON POINT TRANSPORT, INC., who owned, leased and/or controlled the subject motor vehicle.

26. Therefore, Defendant, ON POINT TRANSPORT, INC., is vicariously liable for the

acts of negligence of Defendant, JOSEPH MISATULI LEIA, which such negligence caused the 

aforementioned automobile accident and the resulting serious and permanent injuries as herein 

described. 

27. As a result of Defendant, ON POINT TRANSPORT, INC.’S, vicarious liability for

Defendant, JOSEPH MISATULI LEIA’s, active negligence, carelessness, and reckless actions, 

Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 160 of 178
Marcelle Angall-Leonce v. On Point Transport, Inc., etal

Case No.: 19-CA-002558

8 | P a g e

Plaintiffs, MARCELLE ANN ANGALL-LEONCE AND ROMANUS SYLVESTER LEONCE,

were seriously and permanently injured in the crash caused by Defendant, JOSEPH MISATULI 

LEIA, and Defendant ON POINT TRANSPORT, INC., suffering bodily injury and resulting pain 

and suffering, disability, disfigurement, mental anguish, loss of the capacity for the enjoyment of 

life, expense of hospitalization, medical and nursing care and treatment, loss of earnings in the 

past and loss of ability to earn money in the future, aggravation of a previous existing condition. 

These losses are either permanent or continuing in nature and Plaintiffs, MARCELLE ANN 

ANGALL-LEONCE AND ROMANUS SYLVESTER LEONCE, will suffer the losses in the 

future. 

COUNT III - LOSS OF CONSORTIUM

Plaintiffs, MARCELLE ANN ANGALL-LEONCE AND ROMANUS SYLVESTER 

LEONCE re-alleges those allegations contained within paragraphs 1 through 27 above and 

incorporate them herein by this reference. 

28. At all relevant times, and at all times material to this action, Plaintiffs, MARCELLE 

ANN ANGALL-LEONCE AND ROMANUS SYLVESTER LEONCE, were and still are living 

together as husband and wife. 

29. As a direct and proximate result of the injuries inflicted upon Plaintiff, ROMANUS 

SYLVESTER LEONCE, due to the vicarious and direct negligence of the Defendants, JOSEPH 

MISATULI LEIA and ON POINT TRANSPORT, INC., Plaintiff, ROMANUS SYLVESTER 

LEONCE, has suffered the loss of care, comfort, society, and consortium of his wife, MARCELLE 

ANN ANGALL-LEONCE. These losses are either permanent or continuing in nature and the 

Plaintiff, ROMANUS SYLVESTER LEONCE, will suffer these losses in the future.

Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 161 of 178
Marcelle Angall-Leonce v. On Point Transport, Inc., etal

Case No.: 19-CA-002558

9 | P a g e

30. As a direct and proximate result of the injuries inflicted upon Plaintiff,

MARCELLE ANN ANGALL-LEONCE, due to the vicarious and direct negligence of the

Defendants, JOSEPH MISATULI LEIA and ON POINT TRANSPORT, INC., Plaintiff, 

MARCELLE ANN ANGALL-LEONCE, has suffered the loss of care, comfort, society, and 

consortium of her husband, ROMANUS SYLVESTER LEONCE. 

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs, MARCELLE ANN ANGALL-LEONCE AND ROMANUS 

SYLVESTER LEONCE, demand judgment for damages against Defendants, JOSEPH 

MISATULI LEIA and ON POINT TRANSPORT, INC., for all damages permitted by Florida law 

together with costs, prejudgment interest on expenses incurred and post-judgment interest, together 

with such other and further relief this Court deems equitable and just, and demands trial by jury 

on all issues. 

TRIAL BY JURY

Plaintiffs MARCELLE ANN ANGALL-LEONCE AND ROMANUS SYLVESTER 

LEONCE demand a trial by jury of all issues and counts so triable herein.

DATED this 3

rd day of February, 2020. 

Respectfully submitted,

FINE, FARKASH & PARLAPIANO, P.A.

622 Northeast First Street

Gainesville, Florida 32601

Telephone: 352-376-6046

Facsimile: 877-272-9101

BY: ______________________________

JACK J. FINE, ESQ.

Attorney for Plaintiffs

Florida Bar Number: 223700

Primary Email: jfine@ffplaw.com

Secondary Email: jduchaj@ffplaw.com

Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 162 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 163 of 178
Filing # 103122711 E-Filed 02/11/2020 02:05:09 PM Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 164 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 165 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 166 of 178
Filing # 103732137 E-Filed 02/21/2020 04:49:11 PM Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 167 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 168 of 178
Filing # 103951055 E-Filed 02/26/2020 02:40:03 PM Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 169 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 170 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 171 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 172 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 173 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 174 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 175 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 176 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 177 of 178
Case 1:20-cv-00127-AW-GRJ Document 4-1 Filed 06/01/20 Page 178 of 178