alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JONATHAN LEWIS,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:20cv300–WS/HTC

FDOC,

Defendant.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF

No. 15) docketed August 10, 2020. The magistrate judge recommends that this

case be dismissed pursuant to the three-strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

The plaintiff, Jonathan Lewis, has filed objections (ECF No. 21) to the

magistrate judge’s report and recommendation. Among other things, Lewis

suggests that the magistrate judge erred in counting—as strikes—cases for which

he paid the filing fee. Courts have consistently determined, however, that the

“three strikes” provision set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) is not limited to prior in

forma pauperis actions. See, e.g., Belanus v. Clark, 796 F.3d 1021, 1028 (9th Cir.

Case 4:20-cv-00300-WS-HTC Document 22 Filed 09/11/20 Page 1 of 3
Page 2 of 3

2105) (concluding that dismissals may be designated as strikes under § 1915(g)

regardless of whether the filing fee is paid); Hyland v. Clinton, 3 F. App’x 478,

479 (6th Cir. 2001) (noting that “§ 1915(g) does not distinguish between prior in

forma pauperis actions and prior actions in which the fee was paid”). Thus, the fact

that Lewis paid the filing fee in some but not all of his prior cases is of no benefit

to him—all of Lewis’s dismissed cases cited by the magistrate judge count as

strikes. Because Lewis has not paid the filing fee in this case, has had three (3) or

more strikes under § 1915(g), and has not demonstrated that he is under imminent

danger of serious physical injury, his case must be dismissed without prejudice,

just as the magistrate judge has recommended.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF No. 15) is

hereby ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order.

2. Plaintiff’s Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and a Preliminary

Injunction (ECF No. 4) is DENIED. All other pending motions are DENIED. 

3. The plaintiff’s complaint and this action are DISMISSED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

4. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: “This action is dismissed without

prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).”

Case 4:20-cv-00300-WS-HTC Document 22 Filed 09/11/20 Page 2 of 3
Page 3 of 3

DONE AND ORDERED this 11th day of September , 2020.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:20-cv-00300-WS-HTC Document 22 Filed 09/11/20 Page 3 of 3
**Exhibit      32**

**CERTIFICATION**

**Pursuant      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections      (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United      States Code)**

***Form 10-Q/A***

|                                                  |                                          |                                  |
|-------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
| Dated:                January                12, 2007 |                                          | /s/                  Howard S. Balter |
|                                                  | Howard                  S. Balter             |
|                                                  | Chief                  Executive Officer      |
|                                                  | (Principal                Executive Officer ) |

|                                                  |                                                                            |                              |
|-------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
| Dated:                January                12, 2007 |                                                                            | /s/                Ilan M. Slasky |
|                                                  | Ilan                  M. Slasky                                                 |
|                                                  | President                                                                       |
|                                                  | (Principal                  Financial and Accounting Officer                  ) |

----
Page 1 of 2 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

FRANK J. ASHMUS, 

 Petitioner, 

v. Case No. 5:20-cv-153-RV-MJF 

WARDEN MALOY, 

 Respondent. 

 / 

ORDER

 This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report 

and Recommendation dated March 1, 2022. (Doc. 16). No objections have been 

filed. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I conclude that the 

Report and Recommendation should be adopted. 

 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 

 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 16), is 

adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. 

 2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus, Doc. 1, challenging the 

revocation of Petitioner’s probation in State of Florida v. Frank Jonathan Ashmus, 

Case 5:20-cv-00153-RV-MJF Document 18 Filed 03/28/22 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2 

Bay County Circuit Court Case No. 2014-CF-657, is DISMISSED for lack of 

jurisdiction as moot. 

 3. The clerk of court shall close this case file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 28th day of March, 2022. 

 /s/ Roger Vinson / 

_________________________ ROGER VINSON

 SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:20-cv-00153-RV-MJF Document 18 Filed 03/28/22 Page 2 of 2
###### Editorial Note on Part 1951

#### Editorial Notes:

1. Some of the exhibits referenced in this part 1951 are not published in the Code of Federal Regulations. Exhibits are available in any Rural Development office.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1951 appear at 80 FR 9890-9894, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### §§ 1951.208-1951.209 [Reserved]
§ 3430.705 Funding restrictions. ( a ) *Facility costs.* Funds made available under this subpart shall not be used for the construction of a new building or facility or the acquisition, expansion, remodeling, or alteration of an existing building or facility (including site grading and improvement, and architect fees).
( b ) *Indirect costs.* Subject to § 3430.54, indirect costs are allowable for Federal assistance awards made by NIFA.
( c ) *Minimum allocations.* After consultation with the Board, NIFA in cooperation with DOE, shall require that each of the three technical topic areas described in § 3430.704(a) receives not less than 15 percent of funds made available to carry out BRDI.
[76 FR 38549, July 1, 2011]
Case 3:20-cv-05503-RV-HTC Document 1 Filed 05/29/20 Page 1 of 26
Case 3:20-cv-05503-RV-HTC Document 1 Filed 05/29/20 Page 2 of 26
Case 3:20-cv-05503-RV-HTC Document 1 Filed 05/29/20 Page 3 of 26
Case 3:20-cv-05503-RV-HTC Document 1 Filed 05/29/20 Page 4 of 26
Case 3:20-cv-05503-RV-HTC Document 1 Filed 05/29/20 Page 5 of 26
Case 3:20-cv-05503-RV-HTC Document 1 Filed 05/29/20 Page 6 of 26
Case 3:20-cv-05503-RV-HTC Document 1 Filed 05/29/20 Page 7 of 26
Case 3:20-cv-05503-RV-HTC Document 1 Filed 05/29/20 Page 8 of 26
Case 3:20-cv-05503-RV-HTC Document 1 Filed 05/29/20 Page 9 of 26
Case 3:20-cv-05503-RV-HTC Document 1 Filed 05/29/20 Page 10 of 26
Case 3:20-cv-05503-RV-HTC Document 1 Filed 05/29/20 Page 11 of 26
Case 3:20-cv-05503-RV-HTC Document 1 Filed 05/29/20 Page 12 of 26
Case 3:20-cv-05503-RV-HTC Document 1 Filed 05/29/20 Page 13 of 26
Case 3:20-cv-05503-RV-HTC Document 1 Filed 05/29/20 Page 14 of 26
Case 3:20-cv-05503-RV-HTC Document 1 Filed 05/29/20 Page 15 of 26
Case 3:20-cv-05503-RV-HTC Document 1 Filed 05/29/20 Page 16 of 26
Case 3:20-cv-05503-RV-HTC Document 1 Filed 05/29/20 Page 17 of 26
Case 3:20-cv-05503-RV-HTC Document 1 Filed 05/29/20 Page 18 of 26
Case 3:20-cv-05503-RV-HTC Document 1 Filed 05/29/20 Page 19 of 26
Case 3:20-cv-05503-RV-HTC Document 1 Filed 05/29/20 Page 20 of 26
Case 3:20-cv-05503-RV-HTC Document 1 Filed 05/29/20 Page 21 of 26
Case 3:20-cv-05503-RV-HTC Document 1 Filed 05/29/20 Page 22 of 26
Case 3:20-cv-05503-RV-HTC Document 1 Filed 05/29/20 Page 23 of 26
Case 3:20-cv-05503-RV-HTC Document 1 Filed 05/29/20 Page 24 of 26
Case 3:20-cv-05503-RV-HTC Document 1 Filed 05/29/20 Page 25 of 26
Case 3:20-cv-05503-RV-HTC Document 1 Filed 05/29/20 Page 26 of 26
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

######  Customs and Border Protection

# AGENCY:

U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security.

# ACTION:

Notice of accreditation and approval of Saybolt LP, as a commercial gauger and laboratory.

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13, Saybolt LP, 3915 Saw Mill Run Blvd., Pittsburgh, PA 15227, has been approved to gauge and accredited to test petroleum and petroleum products for customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory analyses and gauger services should request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is accredited or approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific test or gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquires regarding the specific test or gauger service this entity is accredited or approved to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to                         *cbp.labhq@dhs.gov.*                         Please reference the Web site listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories.                    

*http://cbp.gov/​xp/​cgov/​import/​operations_​support/​labs_​scientific_​svcs/​commercial_​gaugers/​.*

# DATES:

The accreditation and approval of Saybolt LP, as commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on August 12, 2010. The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for August 2013.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Anthony Malana, Laboratories and Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-1060.

Dated: November 16, 2010.

Ira S. Reese,

Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.

[FR Doc. 2010-29679 Filed 11-23-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**Certification
      of Principal Financial Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SRKP 3, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony C.
      Pintsopoulos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Anthony C. PintsopoulosAnthony
                C. Pintsopoulos
              Principal
                Financial Officer
              July
                23, 2008
Editorial Note on Part 1948
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1948 appear at 80 FR 9888, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1948.80 Planning grant selection criteria. The following criteria will be used in the selection of planning grant recipients: ( a ) Planning assistance which could be used for the purpose of the proposed planning process is not available from other sources on a timely basis (Mandatory);
( b ) The increase in the number of new employees and the percentage of increase in employment in coal and/or uranium development activities in the year of designation within the approved designated area (years projected will be averaged and treated equally);
( c ) The need for planning in relation to the financial resources available for such planning;
( d ) The planning priorities and recommended funding level of the Governor(s) of the appropriate State(s);
( e ) The appropriateness of the proposed planning activity for meeting the planning needs of the area, including but not limited to the building of planning capacity and the local priority for the project;
( f ) The inadequacy of existing plans for mitigating the effects of coal and/or uranium development activities; and
( g ) The nature of comments and recommendation received in accordance with 7 CFR part 3015 subpart V, “Intergovernmental Review of Department of Agriculture Programs and Activities”. (See RD Instruction 1970-I, ‘Intergovernmental Review,’ available in any Agency office or on the Agency's Web site.)
[44 FR 35984, June 19, 1979, as amended at 48 FR 29121, June 24, 1983; 76 FR 80731, Dec. 27, 2011]
- 1 - 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION 

Case No. 4:20-cv-00234-WS-MAF 

DELROY A. CHAMBERS, JR., 

 

 Plaintiff, 

 

v. 

 

H2 PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LLC, 

doing business as HOLLAWAY 

PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 

 

Defendant. 

_____________________________________/ 

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

Plaintiff, Delroy A. Chambers, Jr., by and through his undersigned attorneys, 

pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i), Fed. R. Civ. P., hereby files this Notice of Voluntary 

Dismissal with Prejudice, and by agreement of the parties each side will bear their 

own respective attorneys’ fees and expenses. 

Respectfully submitted, 

 Joshua A. Glickman, Esq. 

 Florida Bar No. 43994 

 josh@sjlawcollective.com 

 Shawn A. Heller, Esq. 

 Florida Bar No. 46346 

 shawn@sjlawcollective.com 

Case 4:20-cv-00234-WS-MAF Document 12 Filed 08/04/20 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

 Social Justice Law Collective, PL 

 974 Howard Ave. 

 Dunedin, FL 34698 

 (202) 709-5744 

 (866) 893-0416 (Fax) 

 Attorneys for the Plaintiff 

 By: s/ Shawn A. Heller .

 Shawn A. Heller, Esq. 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing was electronically filed with the 

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, on this 4th day of August, 2020, which 

will send a notice of electronic filing to all attorneys of record. 

By: s/ Shawn A. Heller .

 Shawn A. Heller, Esq. 

 

Case 4:20-cv-00234-WS-MAF Document 12 Filed 08/04/20 Page 2 of 2
§ 301.87 Quarantine; restrictions on interstate movement of specified articles. ( a ) *Notice of quarantine.* Under the authority of sections 411, 412, 414, and 434 of the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7711, 7712, 7714, and 7754),1 2 the Secretary of Agriculture establishes quarantines within the United States to prevent the artificial spread of leaf scald disease and gummosis disease. The regulations in this subpart govern the interstate movement from regulated areas of regulated articles.
( b ) *Quarantine restrictions on interstate movement of regulated articles.* No common carrier or other person shall move interstate from any regulated area any regulated article except in accordance with the conditions prescribed in this subpart.
[48 FR 50059, Oct. 31, 1983, as amended at 66 FR 21052, Apr. 27, 2001; 87 FR 80015, Dec. 29, 2022]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2220 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2220

  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain manufacturing 
                         equipment for molding.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 30, 2006

  Mr. DeMint introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain manufacturing 
                         equipment for molding.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN MANUFACTURING EQUIPMENT FOR MOLDING.

    (a) In General.--Heading 9902.84.88 of the Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule of the United States (relating to certain manufacturing 
equipment) is amended by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/31/
2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO.1:88CR1026-MMP/AK

JOSE SEPULVEDA,

Defendant.

___________________________/

O R D E R 

This § 2255 matter is before the Court on Doc. 3475, Motion for status report update, by

Jose Sepulveda. The motion is GRANTED. Defendant’s motion to vacate is presently third in

line for decision and will be decided in due course. The Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to forward

Defendant a copy of the portion of the docket sheet covering the year 2007 forward, so that he

may update his records.

DONE AND ORDERED this 1st day of February, 2008.

s/ A. KORNBLUM 

ALLAN KORNBLUM

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:88-cr-01026-MP-AK Document 3476 Filed 02/01/08 Page 1 of 1
§ 3430.405 Funding restrictions. ( a ) *Construction.* Funds made available for grants under this subsection shall not be used for the construction of a new building or facility or the acquisition, expansion, remodeling, or alteration of an existing building or facility (including site grading and improvement, and architect fees).
( b ) *Indirect costs.* Subject to § 3430.54, indirect costs are allowable.
( c ) *Start-up businesses.* NIFA does not fund start-up businesses under this subpart.
#### § 2901.3 Oral presentation.

Any person seeking an adjustment under this part 2901 shall be given an opportunity to make an oral presentation of data, views and arguments in support of the request for an adjustment, provided that a request to make an oral presentation is submitted in writing with the request for the adjustment. An official of the Department of Agriculture shall preside at such oral presentation.
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS

*April 19, 2006*

[Cite as *04/19/2006 Case Announcements #2,*2006-Ohio-1910.]

MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS

2006-0357.

#### Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Woods.

This cause is pending before the court upon the filing by Brian J. Woods of objections to the orders of the Board on the Unauthorized Practice of Law. On April 13, 2006, Woods filed a motion for stay pending objections. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by this court that the motion for stay is granted.

Mover, C.J., Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.
|   | 1.     | I                have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A                of                ANTs software inc. (the “Company”);                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|   | 2.     | Based                on my knowledge, this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form                10-K/A                does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit                to state                a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of                the                circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading                with                respect to the period covered by this                report; |

| Date:                ** **June 27, 2007 |   |                                                                  |
|----------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                         | By:    | /s/                Kenneth Ruotolo                                    |
|                                         |   | Kenneth                Ruotolo, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary |
114 STAT. 346 PUBLIC LAW 106–219—JUNE 20, 2000

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4542:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):

June 6, considered and passed House.

June 7, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 106–219

106th Congress

An Act

To designate the Washington Opera in Washington, D.C., as the National Opera.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The Washington Opera, organized under the laws of the District

of Columbia, is designated as the ‘‘National Opera’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper or

other record of the United States to the Washington Opera referred

to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘National

Opera’’.

Approved June 20, 2000.

20 USC 956a and

note.

20 USC 956a

note.

June 20, 2000

[H.R. 4542]
#### § 30.3 Unstemmed.

A form of leaf tobacco consisting of a collection of leaves from which the stems or midribs have not been removed, including leaf-scrap.