alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 222 (Thursday, November 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70738-70739]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29034]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

 [Docket No. ER11-2021-000]


Domtar A.W. LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based 
Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

November 8, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Domtar A.W. LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with an 
accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a 
request for blanket

[[Page 70739]]

authorization, under 18 CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities 
and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is November 29, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5e181b0c1d11303237303b0d2b2e2e312c2a1e383b2c3d70393128"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e1a7a4b3a2ae8f8d888f84b29491918e9395a187849382cf868e97">[email protected]</span></a> or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-29034 Filed 11-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 3560.603 Loan purposes.

On-farm labor housing loans may be made only for the purposes established in § 3560.553. Grants are not available for on-farm labor housing.
Order entered April 23, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00280-CR

EX PARTE CHRISTOPHER RION

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. WX18-90101-L

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s April 11, 2019 motion to abate the appeal to allow the 

trial court to file requested findings of fact and conclusions of law. We GRANT the motion and 

ORDER the trial court to file, within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order, findings of fact 

and conclusions of law regarding appellant’s pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus.

The appeal will be reinstated upon the filing of the trial court’s findings of fact and 

conclusions of law or at such other time as the Court deems appropriate. 

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Income  &  Growth
Fund  26 LLC (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended
September  30,  2006, as filed with the Securities  and  Exchange
Commission  on  the date hereof (the "Report"), the  undersigned,
Robert  P.  Johnson, President of AEI Fund Management XXI,  Inc.,
the  Managing Member of the Company, and Patrick W. Keene,  Chief
Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc., each certify,
pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section  906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Company.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing Member
                              November 10, 2006



                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing Member
                              November 10, 2006
#### § 3300.13 Determination of the efficiency of the thermal appliances as installed in the insulated body.

In determining the efficiency of a thermal appliance with respect to maintaining a prescribed temperature inside the body, the procedures in ATP, Annex 1, Appendix 2, paragraphs 31-40 and 43-47 shall be used. A report of each test shall be completed on a form corresponding to the pertinent test report model prescribed in ATP, Annex 1, Appendix 2. Report forms may be obtained by a request to the ATP manager.
###### Editorial Note on Part 3402

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3402 appear at 76 FR 4807, Jan. 27, 2011.

#### § 3402.4 Food and agricultural sciences areas targeted for National Needs Graduate and Postdoctoral Fellowship Grants Program support.

Areas of the food and agricultural sciences, including multidisciplinary studies, appropriate for Fellowship grant applications are those in which developing shortages of expertise have been determined and targeted by HEP for National Needs Graduate and Postdoctoral Fellowship Grants Program support. When funds are available and HEP determines that a new competition is warranted, the specific areas and funds per area will be identified in a funding opportunity announcement announcing the program and soliciting program applications.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         120,143
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  921,361
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,333,535
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,541,328
<PP&E>                                       2,969,279
<DEPRECIATION>                                 768,177
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,160,235
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,661,677
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           259
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,079,965
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,160,235
<SALES>                                     10,105,532
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,105,532
<CGS>                                        5,236,427
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,323,154
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (13,180)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             354,973
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                204,158
<INCOME-TAX>                                    38,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            166,158
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   166,158
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06
        

</TABLE>
Theodore D. Schade 

Air Pollution Control Officer 

GREAT BASIN UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 

157 Short Street, Bishop, California 93514-3537 

760-872-8211 Fax: 760-872-6109 

June lO,20 10 

Ms. Deborah Jordan, Director 

Air Division 

US Environmental Protection Agency, AIR- 1 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, California 94105 

RE: Coso Junction PMlO Contingency Measures 

Dear Ms. Jordan: 

I understand that your staff would like clarification on the District's commitment to implement 

contingency measures in the Coso Junction Planning Area (CJPA) in the event that a violation 

of the PM 10 standard occurs. As discussed in the 20 10 PM 10 Maintenance Plan and 

Redesignation Request for the Coso Junction Planning Area (adopted May 17,20 1 O), the 

district committed to investigate the cause of any exceedance of the PMlO standard within 60 

days following the end of the quarter during which the event occurred. It should be noted that 

the District has committed to investigate all exceedances of the PM10 standard, and not just 

those events that trigger a PMlO standard violation (e.g. 4th exceedance within 3 years). 

Implementation of contingency measures is likewise triggered by any exceedance of the 

standard and not necessarily a violation of the standard. 

There are three different types of PM10 sources that might cause exceedances of the PM10 

standard at Coso Junction; windblown dust from the Owens Valley Planning Area, dust from 

local sources (e.g. windblown dust), and natural sources (e.g. wildfires). We have monitored 

PM10 violations due to all of these sources at Coso Junction. Contingency measures for each 

of these categories of PMlO sources are as follows: 

Exceedances found to be caused by dust from Owens Lake will be investigated to 

determine if the required control measures were properly implemented in accordance 

with Board Order #080128-01, or if the source of PMlO is from an area not previously 

identified for control. This includes all exceedances measured in the Coso Junction and 

Owens Valley planning areas. The Board Order includes a contingency plan for 

additional dust controls at Owens Lake to control windblown dust generated from the 

lake bed. The contingency measures include deadlines for implementing dust controls 

depending on which Best Available Control Measure is selected to control the dust 

source area. 
Exceedances found to be caused by dust from local sources that are subject to current 

District regulations (See Table 5 of CJPA Maintenance Plan) will be addressed and 

corrected. The District will commit to ordering that corrective actions be taken within 18 

months of our identifying the cause of the exceedance. 

Exceedances found to be caused by Exceptional Events, such as wildfires or earthquakes 

will be flagged in accordance with US EPA policy. 

I hope this clarifies the District's commitment to implement contingency measures in the Coso 

Junction PMlO Planning Area. Please call me or Duane Ono at (760) 872-821 1 if you have any 

questions regarding this matter. 

Sincerely, 

Theodore D. Schade 

Air Pollution Control Officer
ex10-42.htm


    


      EXHIBIT
10.42

       

      FISCAL
2009 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

       

      


      
        
          
            
              
                
                  
                    	
                            Compensation
      Element

                          	
                            Amount

                          
	
                            General
      Board service – cash

                          	
                            Annual
      cash retainer - $60,0001

                          
	 
      	
                            Meeting
      fees: $2,000 in-person, $1,000 telephonic

                          
	
                            General
      Board service-Equity

                          	
                            Initial
      equity grant upon first becoming a Director and annually
      thereafter:

                                - Option
      to purchase 10,000 shares of Common Stock

                                - Restricted
      stock units to purchase 20,000 shares of Common Stock

                                - Both
      grants vest monthly over 12 months

                          
	
                            Lead
      Director

                          	
                            Additional
      cash retainer: $24,0001

                          
	
                            Committee
      Chair service

                          	
                            Additional
      cash retainer:
      1

                                - Audit
      Committee: $10,000

                                - Compensation
      Committee: $10,000

                                - Nominating
      and Governance Committee: $10,000

                          
	
                            Committee
      member service

                          	
                            Additional
      cash retainer:
      1

                                - Audit
      Committee: $10,000

                                - Compensation
      Committee: $10,000

                                - Nominating
      and Governance Committee: $10,000

                          
	 
      	
                            Meeting
      fees:
$1,500

                          


                  

                

              

            

          

        

      

      


      


      

        

      

        
        1
Directors may elect to receive cash retainers in restricted stock with value
equal to 133% of the forgone cash compensation and which vests in full on the
day immediately prior to the subsequent annual meeting of
stockholders.
#### § 360.303 Approval of an application for a permit to move a noxious weed; conditions specified in permit.

The Administrator will approve or deny an application for a permit to move a noxious weed. If the application is approved, the Administrator will issue the permit including any conditions that the Administrator has determined are necessary to prevent dissemination of noxious weeds into the United States or interstate. Such conditions may include requirements for inspection of the premises where the noxious weed is to be handled after its movement under the permit, to determine whether the facilities there are adequate to prevent noxious weed dissemination and whether the conditions of the permit are otherwise being observed. Before the permit is issued, the Administrator will require the responsible person to agree in writing to the conditions under which the noxious weed will be safeguarded.

[75 FR 68954, Nov. 10, 2010]
EXHIBIT 10.5
 
 KB HOME
 1988 EMPLOYEE STOCK PLAN
 (as amended and restated on October 2, 2008)
 Purpose.
 Definitions.
         - 1 -




---



##### 



Administration.
  - 2 -




---



##### 



Shares Subject to the Plan.
    - 3 -




---



##### 



Eligibility and Extent of Participation.
   Grants of Options and Limited Stock Appreciation Rights.
 Grant of Options
 Grant of Limited Stock Appreciation Rights in the Event of Change of Ownership.
 - 4 -




---



##### 



Exercise Price.
   Exercise.
 - 5 -




---



##### 



Transferability of Options.
 Modifications
 Awards.
 Grant of Restricted Stock Awards.
 Selection of Participants.
 Award of Shares.
 - 6 -




---



##### 



Form of Instrument.
 Lapsing Formula and Performance Objectives.
 Rights with Respect to Shares.
 Escrow.
 Restrictions Applicable to Awards.
   - 7 -




---



##### 



Lapse of Restrictions.
 Lapse of Restrictions Due to Achievement of Performance Objectives.
 Lapse of Restrictions Based on Lapsing Schedule.
 Restrictive Legends.
 Designation of Beneficiaries.
  - 8 -




---



##### 



Stock Unit Awards.
 Grant of Stock Unit Awards.
 ) Rules.
      Special Rules.
  - 9 -




---



##### 



Delivery of Shares.
 Financing and Withholding.
 Withholding of Taxes.
 - 10 -




---



##### 



Financing.
 Withholding of Shares.
   Amendments, Suspension or Discontinuance.
 Term of Plan.
 Effective Date.
 - 11 -




---



##### 



Expiration Date.
 Section 409A.
   - 12 -
2005-0785.

#### State v. Cloud.

Columbiana App. No. 01 CO 64, 2005-Ohio-1331. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Columbiana County.

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this case is no longer held for the decisions in 2004- 1171, *State v. Mathis,*Cuyahoga App. No. 83311, 2004-Ohio-2982, and 2004-1267, *State v. Fair,*Cuyahoga App. No. 82278, 2004-Ohio-2971.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case now be held for the decision in 2005-0338, *State v. Bezak,*Cuyahoga App. No. 84008, 2004-Ohio-6623. The briefing schedule remains stayed.
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:94cr3135LAC

 

KELVIN DAVENPORT

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on October 11, 2005

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION FOR POST TRIAL RELIEF PURSUANT TO TITLE 18 U.S.C.

3582 TO MODIFY SENTENCING ORDER AND TO PROVIDE AN UPDATED

PRESENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT

Filed byDEFENDANT PRO SE on 9/27/05 Doc.# 581

RESPONSES:

on Doc.#

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

/s/ / Mary Maloy-Wells

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy-Wells

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 19th day of

October, 2005, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) Booker and FanFan are not retroactive. 

 s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

United States District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 3:94-cr-03135-LC Document 582 Filed 10/19/05 Page 1 of 1
§ 3430.41 Administration. ( a ) *General.* Within the limit of funds available for such purpose, the NIFA ADO shall make Federal assistance awards to those responsible, eligible applicants whose applications are judged most meritorious under the procedures set forth in the RFA. The date specified by the NIFA ADO as the effective date of the award shall be no later than September 30th of the Federal fiscal year in which the project is approved for support and funds are appropriated for such purpose, unless otherwise permitted by law. It should be noted that the project need not be initiated on the award effective date, but as soon thereafter as practical so that project goals may be attained within the funded project period. All funds awarded by NIFA shall be expended solely for the purpose for which the funds are awarded in accordance with the approved application and budget, the regulations, the terms and conditions of the award, the applicable Federal cost principles, and the Department's assistance regulations (e.g., 2 CFR part 200).
( b ) *Notice of Award.* The notice of award document (*i.e.,* Form NIFA-2009, Award Face Sheet) will provide pertinent instructions and information noted in 2 CFR 200.211.
( c ) *Center of Excellence.* Applicant's Notice of Award will reflect that, for that particular grant program, the applicant meets all of the requirements of a center of excellence. Entities recognized as a center of excellence will maintain that distinction for the duration of their award or as identified in the terms and conditions of that award.
[74 FR 45740, Sept. 4, 2009, as amended at 79 FR 76001, Dec. 19, 2014; 82 FR 21110, May 5, 2017; 85 FR 72913, Nov. 16, 2020]
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Smith Barney Bristol Energy Fund L.P. (the ‘‘Partnership’’) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Jennifer Magro, Chief Financial Officer and Director of Citigroup Managed Futures LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|           |                                                                                                                       |
|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|           |                                                                                                                                                          |
|-----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2)  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership. |

/s/ Jennifer Magro            

Jennifer MagroCitigroup Managed Futures LLC Chief Financial Officer and Director     

Date: August 14, 2007

----
#### BUCKLEY et al., Respondents, v. NEW YORK & B. DYEWOOD CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 8, 1906.)

Action by Daniel Buckley and others against the New York & Boston Dyewood Company.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.