alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Michael Alan Hodges, Appellant

No. 06

- 16

- 00067

- CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 54th District Court of McLennan County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 2014

- 1486

- C2 ). Memorandum Opinion delive red by Justice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss

and Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court

below

. We affirm the judgment of the trial court

. We note that the appellant, Michael Alan Hodges, has adequately indicated his inability to

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED DECEMBER 21, 2016

BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
#### § 3560.569 Supplemental requirements for manufactured housing.

The requirements established in § 3560.70 apply to all applications for off-farm labor housing loans and grants.
EXHIBIT 32

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of BlackRock Kelso Capital Corporation (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), James R. Maher, as Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and Corinne Pankovcin, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition
and consolidated results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ James R. Maher   
|Name:                 |  | James R. Maher         
|Title:                |  | Chief Executive Officer
|Date:                 |  | May 3, 2012            
|                     
|/s/ Corinne Pankovcin
|Name:                 |  | Corinne Pankovcin      
|Title:                |  | Chief Financial Officer
|Date:                 |  | May 3, 2012
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 228 (Monday, November 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 73156]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29807]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 4728]


The Amended Designation of Lashkar-e-Tayyiba (LT, LeT), aka 
Lashkar-e-Toiba, aka Lashkar-i-Taiba, aka al Mansoorian, aka al 
Mansooreen, aka Army of the Pure, aka Army of the Righteous, aka Army 
of the Pure and Righteous as a Foreign Terrorist Organization pursuant 
to Section 219(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act

    Based upon a review of the administrative record assembled in this 
matter, and in consultation with the Attorney General and the Secretary 
of the Treasury, the Secretary of State has concluded that there is a 
sufficient factual basis to find that Lashkar-e-Tayyiba, also known 
under the aliases listed above, uses or has used additional aliases, 
namely, Falah-I-Insaniat Foundation, FiF, Falah-e-Insaniat Foundation, 
Falah-e-Insaniyat, Falah-i-Insaniyat, Falah Insania, Welfare of 
Humanity, Humaniatarian Welfare Foundation, Human Welfare Foundation.
    Therefore, effective upon the date of publication in the Federal 
Register, the Secretary of State hereby amends the 2003 redesignation 
of Lashkar-e-Tayyiba as a foreign terrorist organization, pursuant to 
Sec.  219(b) of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1189(b)), to include the following 
new aliases and other possible transliterations thereof: Falah-I-
Insaniat Foundation, FiF, Falah-e-Insaniat Foundation, Falah-e-
Insaniyat, Falah-i-Insaniyat, Falah Insania, Welfare of Humanity, 
Humaniatarian Welfare Foundation, Human Welfare Foundation.

    Dated: September 28, 2010.
Hillary Rodham Clinton,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-29807 Filed 11-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 226 (Wednesday, November 24, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 71712]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29649]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel Initial Scientific Peer Review and 
Merit Evaluation of Grant Applications for NIGMS MIDAS Initiative.
    Date: December 14, 2010.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda North Marriott Hotel and Conference Center, 5701 
Marinelli Road, Bethesda, MD 20852.
    Contact Person: C. Craig Hyde, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Office of Scientific Review, National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences, National Institutes of Health, 45 Center Drive, Room 
3AN18, Bethesda, MD 20892. 301-435-3825, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6e0d065c182e00070640090118"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3152590347715f58591f565e47">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, 
Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and 
Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and 
Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental 
Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, 
Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 18, 2010.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-29649 Filed 11-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
PUBLIC LAW 108–399—OCT. 30, 2004 118 STAT. 2253

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4731:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 108–678 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):

Sept. 29, considered and passed House.

Oct. 11, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 108–399

108th Congress

An Act

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize the National

Estuary Program.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF NATIONAL ESTUARY PROGRAM.

Section 320(i) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33

U.S.C. 1330(i)) is amended by striking ‘‘2005’’ and inserting ‘‘2010’’.

Approved October 30, 2004.

Oct. 30, 2004

[H.R. 4731]
#### § 3565.151 Eligible borrowers.

Guaranteed loans must be made to an eligible borrower whose intention is to provide and maintain rural rental housing. The ownership entity must be a valid entity in good standing under the laws of the jurisdiction in which it is organized. Eligible borrowers shall include individuals, corporations, state or local public agencies or an instrumentality thereof, partnerships, limited liability companies, trusts, Indian tribes, or any organization deemed eligible by the Agency. Eligible borrowers must be U.S. citizens or permanent legal residents; a U.S. owned corporation, or a limited liability company, or partnership in which the principals are U.S. citizens or permanent legal residents.
Exhibit
32




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Each
of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Sino Gas
International Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1)
 The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal  quarter  ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Date:
August 19, 2009





/s/ Yuchuan LiuYuchuan
      LiuChief
      Executive Officer/s/ Yugang ZhangYugang
      ZhangChief
      Financial Officer
Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. 4:90cr4051–WS/GRJ

NATHANIEL JAMES,

Defendant.

 

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S RULE 60(b) MOTION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc.

769) docketed August 22, 2017. The magistrate judge recommends that

Defendant's pending Rule 60(b) motion be denied for lack of jurisdiction.

Defendant has filed objections (doc. 771) to the report and recommendation.

On October 21, 2016, Defendant filed a § 2255 motion (doc. 744), seeking a

reduction in his life sentence based on new facts involving a prior conviction that

was used to enhance his 1991 sentence. This court denied (doc. 757) that motion

on April 12, 2017. Defendant thereafter appealed the court’s April 12th decision to

the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, where it remains pending.

On August 14, 2017, Defendant filed the Rule 60(b) motion that is now before this
Page 2 of 3

court. 

In his Rule 60(b) motion (doc. 765), Defendant seeks to reopen his original §

2255 proceedings—proceedings that ended on March 18, 1999, when this court 

denied Defendant’s original § 2255 motion (doc. 473) as recommended (doc. 517)

by the magistrate judge. Defendant contends that “this Court[‘s] adoption of the

Magistrate Judge Report and Recommendation, in January 8, 1999, was a defect in

the integrity of the federal habeas proceedings.” Doc. 765, p. 5. In particular,

Defendant complains that the magistrate judge relied on inaccurate information

when he denied an evidentiary hearing in Defendant’s 1999 § 2255 proceedings. 

Although he tries to distinguish his Rule 60(b) motion from his recent §

2255 motion, the two motions in fact seek the same relief: reduction in Defendant’s

life sentence based on the recent vacation of his prior convictions in the Southern

District of Florida. In essence, the claim that Defendant now makes is the same as

that which is currently before the Eleventh Circuit. Jurisdiction over that claim lies

not here but in the Eleventh Circuit.

To the extent, if any, that Defendant seeks relief different from what he

sought in his recent § 2255 motion, this court lacks jurisdiction because Defendant

has not requested or been granted leave by the Eleventh Circuit to file a successive

motion to vacate.
Page 3 of 3

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge’s recommendation (doc. 769) is ADOPTED.

2. Defendant’s Rule 60(b) motion (doc. 765) is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 7th day of September , 2017.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
#### § 301.75-15 Funds for the replacement of commercial citrus trees.

Subject to the availability of appropriated funds, the owner of a commercial citrus grove may be eligible to receive funds to replace commercial citrus trees in accordance with the provisions of this section.

(a) *Eligibility.* The owner of a commercial citrus grove may be eligible to receive funds to replace commercial citrus trees removed to control citrus canker if the trees were removed pursuant to a public order between 1986 and 1990 or on or after September 28, 1995.

(b) *Tree replacement payments.* The owner of a commercial citrus grove who is eligible under paragraph (a) of this section to receive funds to replace commercial citrus trees will, upon approval of an application submitted in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section, receive a payment of $26 per tree up to the following per-acre maximum payments:

| Variety | Maximum payment per acre |
| --- | --- |
| Grapefruit, red seedless | $2,704 |
| Orange, Valencia | 3,198 |
| Orange, early/midseason/navel | 3,068 |
| Tangelo | 2,964 |
| Lime | 4,004 |
| Other or mixed citrus | 2,704 |

(c) *How to apply for tree replacement funds.* The form necessary to apply for funds to replace commercial citrus trees may be obtained from any local citrus canker eradication program office in Florida, or from the USDA Citrus Canker Eradication Program, 6901 West Sunrise Boulevard, Plantation, FL 33313. The completed application should be accompanied by a copy of the public order directing the destruction of the trees and its accompanying inventory that describes the number and the variety of trees removed. Your completed application must be sent to the USDA Citrus Canker Eradication Program, Attn: Commercial Tree Replacement Program, c/o Division of Plant Industry, 3027 Lake Alfred Road, Winter Haven, FL 33881. Claims for trees destroyed on or before October 16, 2000, must have been received on or before December 15, 2000. Claims for trees destroyed after October 16, 2000, must be received within 60 days after the destruction of the trees. The Administrator may, on a case-by-case basis, approve the consideration of late claims when it appears that the claim was late through no fault of the owner of the trees, in the opinion of the Administrator. However, any request for consideration of a late claim must be submitted to the Administrator on or before August 19, 2002 for trees destroyed on or before August 17, 2001, and within 1 year after the destruction of the trees for trees destroyed after August 17, 2001.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0163)

[65 FR 61080, Oct. 16, 2000, as amended at 66 FR 43066, Aug. 17, 2001]
Exhibit 32.2





Certification
of Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant
to


Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2010 (the “Report”) of ATS Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed
with the SEC on the date hereof, I, Pamela A. Little, Chief Financial Officer of
the Registrant, hereby certify that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.





Date:
      April 28, 2010
              By:
              /s/ Pamela A. LittlePamela
      A. LittleChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)
Editorial Note on Part 1980
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1980 appear at 80 FR 9905, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1980.495 RD forms and guides. The following RD forms and guides, as applicable, are used in connection with processing B&I, D&D, and DARBE loan guarantees; they are incorporated in this subpart and made a part hereof: ( a ) Form RD 449-1. “Application for Loan and Guarantee” is referred to as “Appendix A,” or successor form,
( b ) The “Certificate of Incumbency and Signature” or successor form,
( c ) “Guidelines for Loan Guarantees for Alcohol Fuel Production Facilities” is referred to as “Appendix C. ”
( d ) “Alcohol Production Facilities Planning, Performing, Development and Project Control” is referred to as “Appendix D. ”
( e ) “Environmental Assessment Guidelines” is referred to as “Appendix E. ”
( f ) Form RD 449-14, “Conditional Commitment for Guarantee, ” or successor form.
( g ) “Liquidation and Property Management Guide” as found in RD Instruction 1980-E Appendix G.
( h ) “Suggested Format for the Opinion of the Lender's Legal Counsel” is referred to as “Appendix H. ”
( i ) “Instructions for Loan Guarantees for Drought and Disaster Relief” and Forms RD 1980-68, “Lender's Agreement—Drought and Disaster Guaranteed Loans, ” 1980-69, “Loan Note Guarantee—Drought and Disaster Guaranteed Loans, ” and 1980-70, “Assignment Guarantee Agreement—Drought and Disaster Guaranteed Loans, or their successor forms.
( j ) [Reserved]
( k ) “Regulations for Loan Guarantees for Disaster Assistance for Rural Business Enterprises” and Forms RD 1980-71, “Lender's Agreement—Disaster Assistance for Rural Business Enterprises Guaranteed Loans,” 1980-72 “Loan Note Guarantee—Disaster Assistance for Rural Business Enterprises Guaranteed Loans,” and 1980-73 “Assignment Guarantee Agreement—Disaster Assistance for Rural Business Enterprises Guaranteed Loans” or their successor forms.
[80 FR 9910, Feb. 24, 2015]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE

STATE OF MONTANA

Case No. DA 21-0533

STAND UP MONTANA, a Montana non-profit

Corporation; CLINTON DECKER; MORGEN HUNT;

GABRIEL EARLE; ERICK PRATHER; BRADFORD

CAMPBELL; MEAGAN CAMPBELL; and JARED ORR,

Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v.

MISSOULA COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS,

ELEMENTARY DISTRICT NO. 1, HIGH

SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, MISSOULA 

COUNTY, STATE OF MONTANA; TARGET

RANGE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 23; and 

HELLGATE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 

DISTRICT NO. 4,

Defendants and Appellees.

STAND UP MONTANA, a Montana 

non-profit corporation; JASMINE 

ALBERINO; TIMOTHY ALBERINO; 

VICTORIA BENTLEY; DAVID DICKEY; 

WESLEY GILBERT; KATIE GILBERT; 

KIERSTEN GLOVER; RICHARD 

JORGENSON; STEPHEN PRUIETT; 

LINDSEY PRUIETT; ANGELA 

MARSHALL; SEAN LITTLEJOHN; and 

KENTON SAWDY,

Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v.

05/18/2022
2

BOZEMAN SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 7, 

MONFORTON SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 27, 

and BIG SKY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 72,

Defendants and Appellees.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR DISMISSAL OF 

CLAIMS OF APPELLANT DAVID DICKEY

On Appeal from the Montana Fourth Judicial District Court

Missoula County, Cause No. DV-21-1031

Before Hon. Jason Marks

On Appeal from the Montana Eighteenth Judicial District Court

Gallatin County, Cause No. DV-21-975B

Before Hon. Rienne H. McElyea

Quentin M. Rhoades

RHOADES & ERICKSON 

PLLC

430 Ryman Street

Missoula, Montana 59802

Telephone: 406-721-9700

qmr@montanalawyer.com

courtdocs@montanalawyer.com

For Appellants

Elizabeth A. Kaleva

Kevin A. Twidwell

Elizabeth A. O’Halloran

KALEVA LAW OFFICES

1911 S. Higgins Ave.

P.O. Box 9312

Missoula, MT 59807

eakaleva@kalevalaw.com

ktwidwell@kalevalaw.com

bohalloran@kalevalaw.com

For Appellees

Pursuant to the Unopposed Motion for Dismissal filed by David 

Dickey, and with good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the claims of David Dickey in the 

above entitled action are voluntarily dismissed with prejudice. 

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 18 2022
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### U.S. Customs and Border Protection

# AGENCY:

U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security.

# ACTION:

Notice of approval of Camin Cargo Control, Inc., as a commercial gauger.

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.13, Camin Cargo Control, Inc., 73 Castle Coakely, Unit 3, Christiansted, St. Croix, VI 00821, has been approved to gauge petroleum and petroleum products for customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct gauger services should request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquires regarding the specific gauger service this entity is approved to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to                         *cbp.labhq@dhs.gov.*                         Please reference the Web site listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories.                    

*http://cbp.gov/​xp/​cgov/​import/​operations_​support/​labs_​scientific_​svcs/​commercial_​gaugers/​.*

# DATES:

The approval of Camin Cargo Control, Inc., as commercial gauger became effective on August 9, 2010. The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for August 2013.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Anthony Malana, Laboratories and Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-1060.

Dated: November 16, 2010.

Ira S. Reese,

Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.

[FR Doc. 2010-29676 Filed 11-23-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
----

Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

            In connection with the Quarterly Report of Amalgamated Pictures Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Avery Pack, President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: November 19, 2013

| /s/ Avery Pack                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
| Avery Pack, President and          Chief Executive Officer          (Principal Executive Officer) and          Acting Chief Financial Officer          (Principal Financial Officer and          Principal Accounting Officer) |