alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of

opinions that merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-20327 Conference Calendar

__________________ STEVEN WAYNE BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus C. GILLILAND ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. CA-H-93-2301

- - - - - - - - - - December 21, 1995 Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Steven Wayne Brown appeals the dismissal of his civil rights action as frivolous, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). Brown lists several issues for appeal regarding his claims of mailroom misconduct and use of excessive force against him; recites a number of factual allegations regarding his mailroom misconduct claims; and contends in conclusional fashion that the district court did not review the record sufficiently before dismissingNo. 95-20327 -2- his case, condoned the defendants' misconduct, and was not aware of the jurisdiction of the U.S. Postal Service to redress complaints regarding institutional mail. Brown has failed to provide legal arguments sufficient to brief the issues he indicates he wishes to raise for appeal. His conclusional allegations of error by the district court are insufficient to provide this court a basis for review of the judgment. See Grant v. Cuellar , 59 F.3d 523, 525 (5th Cir. 1995), Andrews v. Collins , 21 F.3d 612, 632 (5th Cir. 1994), cert. denied , 115 S. Ct. 908 (1995). Because Brown has failed to brief any issues, his appeal is frivolous. We caution Brown that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Brown is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous because they previously have been decided by this court. DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
|   | 1. |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                    |
|--------|----|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 2. |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                                     | India Globalization Capital, Inc. |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                     |                              |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |   |
| Date: November 19,  2010  | By:                               | /s/ John B. Selvaraj                                      |   |
|                                     |                              | John B. Selvaraj                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |   |
|                                     |                              | Treasurer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer                                                                                                                                                                                              |   |
IN THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

 TALLAHASSEE DIVISION 

BOBBIE BOLTON 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. 

 CASE NO. 4:03CV307-RH/WCS 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and 

CORRECTIONS OFFICER JEFFREY LINTON, 

 Defendants. 

STIPULATED MOTION OF THE PARTIES 

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

COME NOW the Parties, BOBBI BOLTON, THE UNITED STATES, 

and JEFFREY LINTON, by and through the undersigned attorneys, and 

move this Honorable Court for a 60-day extension of Discovery and 

continuance of Pretrial and Trial dates and as grounds would show: 

1. On service of the Defendant JEFFREY LINTON on June 17, 

2004, the Court extended discovery to August 2, 2004, deferring 

any further consideration of extension until after the attorney 

conference and requiring any subsequent motion for extension to 

state the position of all the Parties. 
2. The attorneys met on July 14, 2004, as required by the Court’s 

Order of May 18, 2004, and agreed that each of the parties 

needed additional time for discovery, including written discovery 

and depositions, and that the schedules of the attorneys included 

some trips out of town that would limit choices of deposition dates. 

3. The attorneys agree that an additional 90 days is needed to 

complete discovery and that a trial should be set at the conclusion 

of dispositive motions. 

4. This request is not made for the purpose of unnecessary delay, is 

made in good faith, and will not unduly prejudice a party. 

WHEREFORE, the undersigned attorneys move the Court to grant an 

extension of time of 60 days to complete discovery as well as additional 

time for completion of pretrial pleadings and papers and that the pretrial 

conference and trial now set for September 7, 2004, be continued 

accordingly. 
 Respectfully submitted, 

 s/James Cook____________________ 

 JAMES V. COOK 

 For the Plaintiff 

 Florida Bar Number 0966843 

 314 West Jefferson Street 

 Tallahassee, Florida 32301 

 (850) 222-8080; 561-0836 fax 

 s/Robert Stinson___________________ 

 ROBERT STINSON 

 For the United States of America 

 s/Gary Printy______________________ 

 GARY PRINTY 

 For Jeffrey Linton 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I CERTIFY that the foregoing was filed electronically on 7/20/04 and that 

the person(s) noted below is/are registered to be notified by the CM/ECF 

electronic mail system: 

Robert Stinson, Esq. 

U.S. Attorney's Office 

111 North Adams Street, Ste. 400 

Tallahassee, Florida 32301-7717 

Gary Printy, Esq. 

Law Office of Gary Printy 

1804 Miccosukee Commons Dr., Ste. 200 

Tallahassee, Florida 32308-5471 

 s/James Cook____________________ 

 JAMES V. COOK
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2461 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2461

   To amend the Small Business Act to make permanent the Small Loan 
               Advantage program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 20, 2013

   Ms. Hahn introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Small Business Act to make permanent the Small Loan 
               Advantage program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``SBA Loan Paperwork Reduction Act of 
2013''.

SEC. 2. SMALL LOAN ADVANTAGE PROGRAM.

    Section 7(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(a)) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(36) Small loan advantage.--
                    ``(A) Permanent establishment.--The Administrator 
                shall carry out a Small Loan Advantage program in 
                accordance with this paragraph.
                    ``(B) Administration of program.--Except as 
                otherwise provided under this paragraph, the 
                Administrator shall carry out the Small Loan Advantage 
                program in the same manner as the Small Loan Advantage 
                loan initiative of the Administration--
                            ``(i) under which lenders were eligible to 
                        begin submitting loans on February 15, 2011; 
                        and
                            ``(ii) as in effect on June 1, 2013.
                    ``(C) Nonapplicability of pilot program 
                limitations.--No limitation under paragraph (25)(A) 
                applies to the Small Loan Advantage program under this 
                paragraph.
                    ``(D) Increased flexibility.--The Administrator is 
                authorized to increase the program's maximum loan 
                amount, to reduce the program's fees, and to further 
                streamline the program's loan approval process if the 
                Administrator determines that such adjustments would be 
                fair and appropriate.''.
                                 <all>
```
Commercial HVAC, WH, and Refrigeration Certification Working Group

Tuesday, April 30, 2013 Meeting

Agenda

9:00

– 9: 1 5 Welcome

DOE Building Amenities, S ecurity, etc.

9:15

– 9:30 Ethics Discussion

9:30

– 10: 15 Introductions by the Working Group Members

10:15

– 10:30 Introduction of Facilitator

Description of Negotiated Rulemaking

10:30

– 10:45 Break

10:45

– 12:15 Establishment of Ground Rules for the Negotiations

12:15

– 1: 15 Lunch

1:15

– 4:3 0 Discussion of Rulema king Objective and Scope of Negotiations

4:30

– 5:00 Development of Schedule for Negotiation Meetings

N.B.: June 26

– Progress Report to ASRAC

August 30

– Final Recommendation to ASRA C
Industry Sectors, Definitions & Number of Small Entities Potentially 

Affected by the Reconsideration of Exemptions for Insect Repellents: 

Skin-Applied Insect Repellents Exempted under 40 CFR 152.25(f) 

Small Firms 

2008 NAICS Name for 

Industry/Sector 

2008 

NAICS 

Code 

2008 

SBA Limit for 

Small Business Number Employees 

All Other Business Support 

Services 561499 

 Revenue < 

$7,000,000 2 8 

All Other Personal Services 812990 

 Revenue < 

$7,000,000 1 14 

Child Day Care Services 624410 

 Revenue < 

$7,000,000 1 1 

Drugs and Druggists' Sundries 

Merchant Wholesalers 424210 <100 Employees 3 50 

Farm Supplies Merchant 

Wholesalers 424910 <100 Employees 1 4 

Medicinal and Botanical 

Manufacturing 325411 <750 Employees 1 2 

Motor Vehicle Supplies and New 

Parts Merchant Wholesalers 423120 <100 Employees 1 1 

Other Chemical and Allied 

Products Merchant Wholesalers 424690 <100 Employees 1 2 

Other Management Consulting 

Services 541618 

 Revenue < 

$7,000,000 1 6 

Pesticide and Other Agricultural 

Chemical Manufacturing 325320 <500 Employees 8 231 

Polish and Other Sanitation Good 

Manufacturing 325612 <500 Employees 1 11 

Soap and Other Detergent 

Manufacturing 325611 <750 Employees 2 11 

Supermarkets and Other Grocery 

(except Convenience) Stores 445110 

 Revenue < 

$27,000,000 1 1 

Toilet Preparation Manufacturing 325620 <500 Employees 1 31 

Unclassified Establishments / 

could not be classified 999990 5 ???
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Consumer Product Safety Commission

# TIME AND DATE:

 Wednesday, November 24, 2010, 9 a.m.-12 Noon.

# PLACE:

 Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, Maryland.

# STATUS:

 Commission Meeting—Open to the Public.

## Matter To Be Considered

*Decisional Matter:*                     Publically Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database—Final Rule.                

                    A live webcast of the Meeting can be viewed at                     *http://www.cpsc.gov/​webcast.*

For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, call (301) 504-7948.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

 Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

Dated: November 17, 2010.

Todd A. Stevenson,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-29598 Filed 11-19-10; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
#### § 29.3537 Package.

A hogshead, tierce, case, bale, or other securely enclosed parcel or bundle.

[30 FR 9207, July 23, 1965. Redesignated at 49 FR 16759, Apr. 20, 1984]
#### Gene Clark, Respondent-Appellant, v Oswego County Mutual *776Insurance Company, Appellant-Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs, on the opinion at Special Term, Aloi, J. (Appeals from judgment of Onondaga Supreme Court — declaratory judgment.) Present— Hancock, Jr., J. P., Schnepp, Callahan, Doerr and Witmer, JJ.
# L_2022002EN.01001001.xml

| 6.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 2/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 2/10

---

Corrigendum to Council Implementing Decision (CFSP) 2021/2125 of 2 December 2021 implementing Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 430 I of 2 December 2021
  )

| 1. | On page 22, in entry 178 (Valiantsina Genadzeuna KULIK), under ‘Identifying Information’: |
| --- | --- |

1.

On page 22, in entry 178 (Valiantsina Genadzeuna KULIK), under ‘Identifying Information’:

for:

‘Gender: male’,

read:

‘Gender: female’.

| 2. | On page 24, in entry 181 (Hanna Mikhailauna SAKALOUSKAYA), under ‘Identifying Information’: |
| --- | --- |

2.

On page 24, in entry 181 (Hanna Mikhailauna SAKALOUSKAYA), under ‘Identifying Information’:

for:

‘Gender: male’,

read:

‘Gender: female’.

---
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)

I, Richard Heyse,
certify that:

1. the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the Report),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Innophos, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided Innophos Investments Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by
Innophos Investments Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The undersigned
expressly disclaims any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.



|                      |  |                                                                                       
|--------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 11, 2006 |  | /s/    RICHARD HEYSE                                                                  
|                      |  | Richard Heyse Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to the requirements of 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350 and is not being filed as a part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)

I, Richard Heyse,
certify that:

1. the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Innophos, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided Innophos, Inc. and will be retained by Innophos, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to
update the foregoing certification except as required by law.

Date: May 9, 2008



/S/ RICHARD HEYSERichard Heyse Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to the requirements of 18
U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as a part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

vs. CASE NO.: 4:02cr46-SPM

DARREN THOMAS,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR SELF-SURRENDER

Upon consideration, Defendant Darren Thomas’s unopposed Motion to

Postpone Surrender Date (doc. 51) is granted. Defendant shall have up to and

including 12 o’clock Noon on Friday, May 11, 2007 to self-surrender to the United

States Marshal’s office in Tallahassee, Florida or to the institution designated by

the Bureau of Prisons.

SO ORDERED this 13th day of April, 2007.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 4:02-cr-00046-SPM-WCS Document 52 Filed 04/13/07 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2565 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2565

   To provide for the termination of employment of employees of the 
    Internal Revenue Service who take certain official actions for 
                          political purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 27, 2013

  Mr. Renacci (for himself, Mr. Meehan, Mr. Stivers, Mr. Chabot, Mr. 
Gibbs, Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania, Mr. Johnson of Ohio, Mr. Huizenga of 
  Michigan, Mr. Joyce, Mr. Massie, Mr. Boustany, Mr. Tiberi, Mr. Sam 
Johnson of Texas, Mr. Wilson of South Carolina, Mr. Webster of Florida, 
Mr. Young of Indiana, Mr. Miller of Florida, Mr. Wenstrup, Mr. Delaney, 
  Mr. Carney, Mr. Marchant, Mr. Roskam, Mrs. Black, Mr. Labrador, Mr. 
 Jordan, Mr. Nugent, Mr. Rothfus, Mr. Gerlach, Mr. Amodei, Mr. Marino, 
 and Mr. Griffin of Arkansas) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To provide for the termination of employment of employees of the 
    Internal Revenue Service who take certain official actions for 
                          political purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop Targeting Our Politics IRS 
Act'' or as the ``STOP IRS Act''.

SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE EMPLOYEES 
              FOR TAKING OFFICIAL ACTIONS FOR POLITICAL PURPOSES.

    Paragraph (10) of section 1203(b) of the Internal Revenue Service 
Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 is amended to read as follows:
            ``(10) performing, delaying, or failing to perform (or 
        threatening to perform, delay, or fail to perform) any official 
        action (including any audit) with respect to a taxpayer for 
        purpose of extracting personal gain or benefit or for a 
        political purpose.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 29.3613 Rule 12.

The use of any grade may be restricted by the Director during any marketing season, when it is found that the grade is not needed or appears in insufficient volume to justify its use.
# L_2020302EN.01002701.xml

| 16.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 302/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 302/27

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1276 of 11 September 2020 concerning the non-renewal of the approval of the active substance bromoxynil, in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market, and amending the Annex to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 540/2011

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 300, 14 September 2020
  )

| 1. | On page 34, in Article 3, the date is changed as follows: |
| --- | --- |

1.

On page 34, in Article 3, the date is changed as follows:

for

‘
  14 March 2021
  ’,

read

‘
  17 March 2021
  ’.

| 2. | On page 34, in Article 4, the date is changed as follows: |
| --- | --- |

2.

On page 34, in Article 4, the date is changed as follows:

for

‘
  14 September 2021
  ’,

Read

‘
  17 September 2021
  ’.

---
Case 5:19-cr-00068-TKW-MAL Document 42-9 Filed 12/14/20 Page 1 of 6
Case 5:19-cr-00068-TKW-MAL Document 42-9 Filed 12/14/20 Page 2 of 6
Case 5:19-cr-00068-TKW-MAL Document 42-9 Filed 12/14/20 Page 3 of 6
Case 5:19-cr-00068-TKW-MAL Document 42-9 Filed 12/14/20 Page 4 of 6
Case 5:19-cr-00068-TKW-MAL Document 42-9 Filed 12/14/20 Page 5 of 6
Case 5:19-cr-00068-TKW-MAL Document 42-9 Filed 12/14/20 Page 6 of 6
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2533 

To impose a moratorium on conferences held by the Internal Revenue Service. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 27, 2013 

Mr. ROSKAM introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To impose a moratorium on conferences held by the Internal 

Revenue Service. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Playing on Citi5 zen’s Cash Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MORATORIUM ON IRS CONFERENCES. 

7 The Internal Revenue Service shall not hold any con8 ference until— 

9 (1) the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Ad10 ministration submits a report to Congress— 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2533 IH

1 (A) certifying that the Internal Revenue 

2 Service has implemented all of the recommenda3 tions set out in such Inspector General’s report 

4 titled ‘‘Review of the August 2010 Small Busi5 ness/Self-Employed Division’s Conference in 

6 Anaheim, California’’, and 

7 (B) describing such implementation, and 

8 (2) the Internal Revenue Service is authorized 

9 by law (enacted after the date of the enactment of 

10 this Act) to resume holding conferences. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS