alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PUBLIC LAW 106–204—MAY 23, 2000 114 STAT. 311

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 2370:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):

May 4, considered and passed Senate.

May 15, considered and passed House.

Æ

Public Law 106–204

106th Congress

An Act

To designate the Federal building located at 500 Pearl Street in New York City,

New York, as the ‘‘Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF DANIEL PATRICK MOYNIHAN UNITED

STATES COURTHOUSE.

The Federal building located at 500 Pearl Street in New York

City, New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Daniel

Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the Federal building referred

to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the Daniel

Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse.

Approved May 23, 2000.

May 23, 2000

[S. 2370]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

MARTINEZ DIAZ MIGUEL,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 4:20cv276-TKW-MAF 

OFFICER C. JAVROE,

Respondent.

/

OR D E R

This case is before the Court based upon the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 10). No objections were filed. Having reviewed the Report 

and Recommendation and the case file, I agree with the magistrate judge’s 

determination that this case is due to be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. This case is DISMISSED, and the Clerk shall close the file.

DONE and ORDERED this 31st day of August, 2020.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:20-cv-00276-TKW-MAF Document 12 Filed 08/31/20 Page 1 of 1
3.103-2 Evaluating the certification.

(a) Evaluation guidelines.

(1) None of the following, in and of itself, constitutes "disclosure" as it is used in paragraph (a)(2) of

the Certificate of Independent Price Determination (hereafter, the certificate):

(i) The fact that a firm has published price lists, rates, or tariffs covering items being acquired by the

Government.

(ii) The fact that a firm has informed prospective customers of proposed or pending publication of

new or revised price lists for items being acquired by the Government.

(iii) The fact that a firm has sold the same items to commercial customers at the same prices being

offered to the Government.

(2) For the purpose of paragraph (b)(2) of the certificate, an individual may use a blanket

authorization to act as an agent for the person(s) responsible for determining the offered prices if-

(i) The proposed contract to which the certificate applies is clearly within the scope of the

authorization; and

(ii) The person giving the authorization is the person within the offeror’s organization who is

responsible for determining the prices being offered at the time the certification is made in the

particular offer.

(3) If an offer is submitted jointly by two or more concerns, the certification provided by the

representative of each concern applies only to the activities of that concern.

(b) Rejection of offers suspected of being collusive.

(1) If the offeror deleted or modified paragraph (a)(1) or (3) or paragraph (b) of the certificate, the

contracting officer shall reject the offeror’s bid or proposal.

(2) If the offeror deleted or modified paragraph (a)(2) of the certificate, the offeror must have

furnished with its offer a signed statement of the circumstances of the disclosure of prices contained

in the bid or proposal. The chief of the contracting office shall review the altered certificate and the

statement and shall determine, in writing, whether the disclosure was made for the purpose or had

the effect of restricting competition. If the determination is positive, the bid or proposal shall be

rejected; if it is negative, the bid or proposal shall be considered for award.

(3) Whenever an offer is rejected under paragraph (b)(1) or (2)of this section, or the certificate is

suspected of being false, the contracting officer shall report the situation to the Attorney General in

accordance with 3.303.

(4) The determination made under paragraph (2) of this section shall not prevent or inhibit the

prosecution of any criminal or civil actions involving the occurrences or transactions to which the

certificate relates.

Parent topic: 3.103 Independent pricing.
On-board	Circulation	and	Seating	Subcommittee (#7)

U.S.	Access	Board:	Rail	Vehicles Access	Advisory	Committee

Subcommittee	on	On-board	Circulation	and	Seating	

July10,	2014

1:00	– 3:00	Eastern

1.		Introductions

2.		Approval	of	the	Agenda

3.		Review	and	completion	of	the	attached	matrix.

In	an	effort	to	close	in	on	key	items	that	are	the	responsibility	of	this	Subcommittee	the	

attached	matrix	contains	dimensions	defined	in	existing	regulations	and	recommended	PRIAA	

guidelines.		The	goal	of	this	meeting	is	to	“fill	in	the	blanks”	for	each	feature	of	each	vehicle	type	

in	the	rows	labeled	“RVAAC”

4.		Next	Steps:

A.	With	the	information	from	the	table	the	chair	will	draft	proposed	language	including	the	

dimensional	information	with	the	functional	/	amenity	issues	established	early	in	the	RVAAC	

process	

B.	Proposed	Homework	for	representatives	of	rail	entities	and	/	or	carbuilders	to	apply	and	

report	the	impact	of	the	dimensional	information	from	the	Matrix.

C.		Draft	language	and	impact	reports	to	be	sent	to	subcommittee	members	for	review	two	

weeks	prior	to	the	next	Subcommittee	meeting	so	that	meeting	can	be	used	to	adjust	the	

recommendations	as	needed.

5.		Action	Items

6.		Assignments

7.		Deadlines

8.		Next	Meeting

Attachments
EXHIBIT 32.1



                                   QUIPP, INC.

                  CERTIFICATION BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
      REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(B) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
                           AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


         I, Michael S. Kady, Chief Executive Officer of Quipp, Inc., a Florida
corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify that, based on my knowledge:

         (1)      The Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
                  December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the
                  requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
                  of 1934, as amended; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                      *   *   *




/s/ MICHAEL S. KADY
------------------------
Michael S. Kady
Chief Executive Officer

Date:    March 29, 2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal Nos. 10-43]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601-3740.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittals 10-43 with attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

Dated: November 9, 2010.

Morgan F. Park,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 69961)          ( print page 69962)          ( print page 69963)          ( print page 69964)          ( print page 69965)          ( print page 69966)          ( print page 69967)          ( print page 69968)          ( print page 69969)          ( print page 69970)          ( print page 69971)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P

[FR Doc. 2010-28765 Filed 11-15-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
EXHIBIT 23.1








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
 We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-170860, 333-153370, 333-124295, 333-105507, 333-62206, and 333-46766) of our report dated March 31, 2011 relating to our audits of the consolidated financial statements of ANTs software inc. included in the 2010 annual report on Form 10-K.  Our report contains an emphasis of a matter paragraph regarding substantial doubt as to the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern.


/s/ WeiserMazars LLP



New York, NY

March 31, 2011
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-07-14T03:12:57-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
exv10w1






Exhibit 10.1




SIXTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




          SIXTH AMENDMENT dated as of February 18, 2009 (this “Amendment”) to EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT dated
as of August 16, 2004, as amended (the “Agreement”) by and between TRW Automotive Inc. (the
“Company”) and Neil E. Marchuk (“Executive”).




          WHEREAS, in order to adjust Executive’s bonus eligibility, Executive and Company desire to
amend the Agreement as set forth below.




          In consideration of the premises and mutual covenants herein, the parties agree as follows:




          1. Defined Terms. Capitalized terms used herein but not defined shall have the
meanings assigned to them in the Agreement.




          2. Amendment to Section 4 of the Agreement. The first sentence of Section 4 of the
Agreement shall be amended to read in its entirety as follows:





“Each fiscal year during the Employment Term beginning with the 2009 fiscal
year, Executive shall be eligible to earn an annual bonus award (an “Annual
Bonus”), the target of which will be ninety percent (90%) of Executive’s
Base Salary (the “Target Annual Bonus”) based upon the achievement of
objectives established by the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors of TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. annually for defined measures of
EBITDAP and cash flow.”



          3. No Other Amendments; Effectiveness. Except as set forth in this Amendment, the
Agreement is ratified and confirmed in all respects. This Amendment shall be effective as of the
date hereof.




          4. Governing Law. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance
with the laws of the State of New York, without regard to conflicts of laws principles thereof.




          5. Counterparts. This Amendment may be signed in two or more counterparts, each of
which shall be deemed to be an original but all of which together shall constitute one and the same
agreement.




     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment as of the day and
year first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 	 
	TRW Automotive Inc.

 	 	 	 
	By:  	/s/ John C. Plant
 	 	/s/ Neil E. Marchuk	 
	 	Name:  	John C. Plant         	 	Neil E. Marchuk	 
	 	Title:  	President and Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCTS

Case No. 3:19md2885

LIABILITY LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

Estes, 7:20cv137

Hacker, 7:20cv131

Keefer, 7:20cv104

Judge M. Casey Rodgers

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones

DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS ORDER NO. 4

This Order addresses Defendants’ objections and counter-designations to 

Plaintiffs’ affirmative deposition designations and Plaintiffs’ objections to 

Defendants’ counter-designations thereto for the following witness depositions: 

1. Jeff Hamer, 2015-10-07

2. Ronald Kieper, 2019-12-19

3. Doug Ohlin (Moldex), 2013-04-24

The Court’s rulings with respect to the above depositions are set forth in the 

attached Exhibit 1. 

SO ORDERED, on this 20th day of March, 2021.

M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
# L_2021327EN.01004101.xml

| 16.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 327/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 327/41

---

Corrigendum to Commission Decision (EU) 2021/1428 of 24 February 2020 ON THE STATE AID SA.31662 – C/2011 (ex NN/2011) implemented by Romania for Timișoara International Airport – Wizz Air (notified under document C(2021) 1065)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 308 of 1 September 2021
  )

On page 59, in recital 417:

for:

‘RON 2 326 million’,

read:

‘RON 2,326 million’.

---
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 17, 2013

N o. 04

- 12

- 00645

- CV

IN THE MATTER OF T.A.

,

From the 289th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2008

- JUV

- 02850 Honorable Carmen Kelsey, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The State’s brief in this precedential appeal was originally due April 12, 2013; however,

the cou rt granted the State an extension of time until May 13 to file the brief . The State has filed a motion requesting an additional thirty day extension of time.

We grant the motion and order the State’s brief is due June 12, 2013 . No further

extensions wi ll be granted absent a showing of extraordinary circumstances. I f the brief is not filed by the date ordered, the appeal may b e set for submission without a State’s brief.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 17th day of May, 2013

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
NO. 07-04-0444-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TE XAS

AT AMARILLO PANEL C MARCH 8, 2005

______________________________ JUAN ISRAEL RAMOS, APPELLANT

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLE E

_________________________________ FROM THE 251ST DISTRICT COURT OF POTTE R COUNTY; NO. 47346 -C; HONOR ABLE PA

TRICK A. PIRTLE, JUDGE

_______________________________ Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and REAVIS, JJ.
MEMORAND UM OPINION Appellant , Ju an Israel Ramos, appeals from a conviction and sentence for possessi on of a co ntrolled substance in a dr ug-free zo ne.
On November 4, 2004, this court directed the clerk of the trial court to file any and all documents in the cou rt’s filere ferencing or filed in connection with any a ffidavits of indigence filed by

appella nt. After receiving and reviewing this supplemental clerk’s record,-2-

this court concluded that no affid avit of indigency, which complied with Tex . R. App. P. 20.2, had been filed in this ca se. As a result, on January 14, 2005, this court directed appellant

to certif ythat he had paid for the record, had made arrangements to pa yfor the record, or that o ther caus e existe d to precl ude dism issal of this app eal for fa ilure tofile the appella te record. We directed appellant to file thiscertification or response by February 7, 2005. Having received no response from appellan t, we now dismiss this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P . 37.3(b), 43.2(f).

Phil Johnson Chief Justice Do not pu blish.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
The Cosmetic Center, Inc.'s financial statements and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-27-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1996
<CASH>                                             979
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,860
<ALLOWANCES>                                        10
<INVENTORY>                                     56,479
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                63,126
<PP&E>                                          17,663
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,256
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  72,522
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,311
<BONDS>                                            109
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            43
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,138
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    72,522
<SALES>                                        133,795
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               133,795
<CGS>                                          105,761
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  136,029
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,929
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,030
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,193)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,433)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,760)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,760)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.11)
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 10.04.4

AMENDMENT
No. 1 TO THE COMMERCIAL SERVICES AGREEMENT EXECUTED
BETWEEN ADELPHIA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, INC. (D/B/A TELCOVE) AND
ADELPHIA COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION

THIS
AMENDMENT No. 1 TO THE COMMERCIAL SERVICES AGREEMENT ("Amendment No. 1) is made this 17th day of August, 2004 ("Effective Date") by and between Adelphia
Business Solutions, Inc. (k/n/a TelCove, Inc.), on behalf of itself and its affiliates ("TelCove") and Adelphia Communications Corporation, on behalf of itself and its affiliates
("ACC").

RECITALS

WHEREAS, TelCove and ACC have executed a Commercial Services Agreement dated April 7, 2004 ("Agreement");

WHEREAS,
ACC has the right to order certain Services (as defined in the Agreement) subject to the terms and conditions of the Agreement;

WHEREAS,
TelCove and ACC desire to modify the Agreement in accordance with this Amendment No. 1 and the terms and conditions of the Agreement are hereby incorporated by reference,
except to the extent superseded by this Amendment No. 1.

NOW
THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties agree as follows:

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, each party has executed this Amendment No. 1 on the date written below.

|TelCove, Inc. |  | Adelphia Communications Corporation
|------------- |  | -----------------------------------
|By:           |  | /s/ James Means                    
|              |  |                                    
|Name:         |  | James Means                        
|              |  |                                    
|Title:        |  | Secretary                          
|              |  |                                    
|Date:         |  | 8-17-04                            
|              |  |                                    

---
oe..___ 6H 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 22-0423

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF:

JACINTA HARRIS,

 Petitioner and Appellee,

 and

CHRISTOPHER HARRIS,

 Respondent and Appellant.

ORDER OF MEDIATOR SUBSTITUTION

This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parties having failed to jointly 

and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c),

Jeff Connolly was appointed as mediator on 8/31/22. The Clerk has since learned 

that Mr. Connolly is not eligible to be a mediator for this court. Therefore, his 

appointment is rescinded, and his name has been removed from the Court’s mediator list.

IT IS ORDERED THAT Daniel B. Bidegaray, whose name appears next on the 

list of attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for Domestic Relations appeals which 

is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the 

mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 

7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment.

A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to 

the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof.

DATED this October 18, 2022.

Bowen Greenwood, Clerk of the Supreme Court

10/18/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0423
c: Adrienne R. Ellington, Emma S. Buescher, Sheryl L. Wambsgans, Margaret 

Sullivan Rose, Morgan Handy, Daniel B. Bidegaray
Case 7:20-cv-36595-MCR-GRJ Document 23 Filed 07/05/24 Page 1 of 2
Case 7:20-cv-36595-MCR-GRJ Document 23 Filed 07/05/24 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

MELVIN WOODARD,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:20cv313–WS/MAF

A. ROBINSON, ARPN, et al,

Defendants.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF

No. 4) docketed September 23, 2020. The magistrate judge recommends that this

action be transferred to the Middle District of Florida. Plaintiff has filed no

objections to the report and recommendation.

The court having reviewed the matter, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF No. 4) is adopted

and incorporated by reference in this order of the court.

Case 4:20-cv-00313-WS-MAF Document 5 Filed 10/26/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

2. The clerk shall TRANSFER this action to the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida, Jacksonville Division, for all further

proceedings.

DONE AND ORDERED this 26th day of October , 2020.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:20-cv-00313-WS-MAF Document 5 Filed 10/26/20 Page 2 of 2