alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 

v. Case No. 3:20cr40-MCR

SHELLEY JOHNSON

____________________________/

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11, Fed.

R. Crim. P., and has entered a plea of guilty to Counts One, Two, Three, Four, Five,

Six, Seven, Ten, Eleven, and Twelve of the Indictment. After cautioning and

examining the Defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in

Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was knowing and voluntary and that the

offenses charged are supported by independent bases in fact containing each of the

essential elements thereof. I therefore recommend that the plea of guilty be accepted

and that the Defendant be adjudicated guilty and have sentence imposed accordingly.

Dated: December 1, 2020.

/s/Charles J. Kahn, Jr. 

CHARLES J. KAHN, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:20-cr-00040-MCR Document 170 Filed 12/01/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Objections to these proposed findings and recommendations may be filed

within twenty-four (24) hours after being served a copy thereof. Any different

deadline that may appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use

only, and does not control. A copy of objections shall be served upon the

magistrate judge and all other parties. A party failing to object to a magistrate

judge’s findings or recommendations contained in a report and recommendation

in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) waives the right to

challenge on appealthe district court's order based on unobjected-to factual and

legal conclusions. See U.S. Ct. of App. 11th Cir. Rule 3-1; 28 U.S.C. § 636.

Case No. 3:20cr40-MCR

Case 3:20-cr-00040-MCR Document 170 Filed 12/01/20 Page 2 of 2
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

ALTERNATIVE PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGIES 

HOLDINGS CORP., ALTERNATIVE 

PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

PATRICK GRIMES, 

Defendant-Appellee

______________________

2022-2165

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

District of Nevada in No. 3:20-cv-00040-MMD-CLB, Judge 

Miranda M. Du.

______________________

O R D E R

The appellant having failed to file the brief required by 

Federal Circuit Rule 31(a) within the time permitted by the 

rules, it is 

Case: 22-2165 Document: 14 Page: 1 Filed: 12/14/2022
ALTERNATIVE PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS CORP. V.

GRIMES 

2

ORDERED that the notice of appeal be, and the same 

hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in 

accordance with the rules. 

FOR THE COURT

December 14, 2022

Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner 

Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: December 14, 2022

Case: 22-2165 Document: 14 Page: 2 Filed: 12/14/2022
§ 301.75-2 General prohibitions. ( a ) Regulated articles may not be moved interstate from a quarantined area except in accordance with a protocol in §§ 301.75-6, 301.75-7, or 301.75-8, or in accordance with § 301.75-4 if less than an entire State is designated as a quarantined area. Regulated articles may be moved in accordance with the regulations in § 301.75-9 for scientific or experimental purposes only.
( b ) Regulated articles moved from a quarantined area with a limited permit may not be moved interstate into any commercial citrus-producing area, except as follows: The regulated articles may be moved through a commercial citrus-producing area if they are covered, or enclosed in containers or in a compartment of a vehicle, while in the commercial citrus-producing area, and are not unloaded in the commercial citrus-producing area without the permission of an inspector.
( c ) Regulated articles moved interstate with a limited permit to an area of the United States that is not a commercial citrus-producing area may not subsequently be moved interstate into any commercial citrus-producing area.
[55 FR 37450, Sept. 11, 1990; 55 FR 48208, Nov. 19, 1990; 72 FR 13427, Mar. 22, 2007]
<PAGE>


                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.21.2

                            NEWS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                                  2 PARK AVENUE
                                   SUITE 1405
                               NEW YORK, NY 10016



February 3, 2004


Mr. J. Morton Davis
D.H. Blair Investment Banking Corp.
44 Wall Street
New York, NY  10005

Dear Morty:

As we discussed, I am writing to confirm our understanding that the maturity
date of a certain Promissory Note, dated March 7, 2001, in the principal amount
of $200,000 of News Communications, Inc. to the order of D.H. Blair Investment
Banking Corp., is extended until July 31, 2005; provided, however that the
principal balance and accrued interest on the note shall be prepaid upon the
sale by News Communications of the stock or assets of its Dan's Papers
subsidiaries to the extent that the cash proceeds from such transactions equal
or exceed $1,000,000.

Please acknowledge your acceptance of the foregoing by signing where indicated
below and returning the same to me. Thank you for your attention and continued
support.

                                          NEWS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.


                                          By:  /s/  James A. Finkelstein
                                               -------------------------
                                               James A. Finkelstein
                                               President


D.H. BLAIR INVESTMENT BANKING CORP.


By:  /s/  J. Morton Davis
     --------------------
     J. Morton Davis
     Chairman
#### § 29.1013 Dirty.

The state of tobacco containing moderate to excessive amounts of dirt or sand, or tobacco to which additional quantities of dirt or sand have been added. (See Rule 24.)
§ 3430.1106 Matching requirements. ( a ) *In general.* Recipients of a grant under this subpart must provide matching contributions on a dollar-for-dollar basis for all Federal funds awarded.
( b ) *Source and type.* The non-Federal share of the cost of a project funded by a grant under this subpart may be provided by a State or local government or a private source. The matching requirement in this section may be met through cash or in-kind contributions, including third-party in-kind contributions fairly evaluated, including facilities, equipment, or services.
( c ) *Limitation.* If an applicant partners with a for-profit entity, the non-Federal share that is required to be provided by the applicant may not include the services of an employee of that for-profit entity, including salaries paid or expenses covered by that employer.
( d ) *Indirect costs.* Use of indirect costs as in-kind matching contributions is subject to § 3430.52(b).
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-2160
GROVER DRUMMOND, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus STATE OF MARYLAND, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frank A. Kaufman, Senior District Judge. (CA-96-1292-K) Submitted: October 17, 1996 Decided: October 23, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Grover Drummond, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his civil complaint wherein he alleged discrimination by state employees who constantly spy on and otherwise hinder him. The district court dismissed the complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Drummond v. M aryland , No. CA-96-1292-K (D. Md. July 18, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsNonprincipal-plane scattering from flat plates: Second-order and corner diffraction and pattern control of horn antennasSeveral high-frequency models for nonprincipal-plane scattering from a rectangular, perfectly conducting plate are examined. Two methods, the Method of Equivalent Currents and corner diffraction coefficients, are considered. Formulations for second-order Physical Theory of Diffraction equivalent currents and for corner diffracted fields are presented. Comparisons are made among plate models. Results away from grazing  are accurate using only first-order terms. Near grazing, second-order and corner diffraction terms  improve the results for many cases. The pattern control of horn antennas using lossy materials to coat the inner walls of the horn is also investigated. Integral Equation and Moment Method techniques are used to formulate the problem. It is clearly demonstrated that side lobe level reduction can be achieved using impedance surfaces  on the inner walls of the horn.Document ID19900001889Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeOther - Collected WorksAuthorsBalanis, Constantine A.*(Arizona State Univ. Tempe, AZ, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 31, 1989Subject CategoryCommunications And RadarReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:185485NASA-CR-185485Accession Number90N11205Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG1-562Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900001889.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsIDRelationTitleN90-11206 through N90-11207Workvisibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
DISCIPLINARY DOCKET

97- 1276.

#### Columbus Bar Assn. v. Kostelac.

This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for stay of suspension and placement on probation by respondent, Gregory M. Kostelac, a.k.a. Gregory Michael Kostelac, Attorney Registration No. 0018124, last known address in Columbus, Ohio.

The court coming now to consider its order of December 31, 1997, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of two years with eighteen months to be stayed on condition, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order. Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the final eighteen months of the two-year’ suspension be, and are hereby, stayed and that respondent Gregory M. Kostelac, a.k.a. Gregory Michael Kostelac, be placed on monitored probation for a period of eighteen months under the supervision of relator, Columbus Bar Association.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(9), relator, Columbus Bar Association, shall appoint an attorney to monitor respondent’s compliance with the terms of his probation and, further, that relator shall file with the Clerk of this court on or before thirty days from the date of this order, the name of the monitoring attorney.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that at the end of the monitored probationary period, relator, Columbus Bar Association, shall file a report with the Clerk of this court indicating whether respondent has complied with the terms of the monitored probation.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent shall keep the Clerk, Disciplinary Counsel, relator, and the monitoring attorney advised of any change of address where respondent may receive communications.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that at the end of the probationary period, respondent may apply for termination of probation. It is further ordered that respondent’s probation shall not be terminated until (1) he applies for termination of probation in accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(9) and meets the requirements of having his probation terminated; (2) he complies with this and all other orders issued by this court; (3) he complies with the Supreme Court Rules for the Government of the Bar of Ohio; (4) relator files a report with the Clerk’s Office of this court indicating that respondent has complied with the terms and conditions of his monitored probation; and (5) this court enters an order terminating his probation.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

VS CASE NO. 4:01mj33-WCS

JOHNSON CUFFY,

REFERRAL AND ORDER

The motion/pleading was filed by plaintiff on 12/20/2005 (document #10), and referred to

Magistrate Judge William C. Sherrill on 12/20/2005.

Summary of motion/pleading: REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF UNSECURED

PERSONAL RECOGNIZANCE BOND

WILLIAM M. MCCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/ Angela Maxwell

DEPUTY CLERK

ORDER OF COURT

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 20th day of December, 2005,

the requested relief is GRANTED. 

S/ William C. Sherrill

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 4:01-mj-00033-WCS Document 11 Filed 12/20/05 Page 1 of 1
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hemis Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                 
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Dated: August 14, 2007 | /s/   Norman Meier                
|---------------------- | ----------------------------------
|                       | Norman Meier                      
|                       | President, Chief Executive Officer

---
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2600 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2600

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen

                                 An Act

 
 To amend the Interstate Land Sales Full Disclosure Act to clarify how 
                    the Act applies to condominiums.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FOR RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM UNITS.
    (a) Exemption.--Section 1403 of the Interstate Land Sales Full 
Disclosure Act (15 U.S.C. 1702) is amended--
        (1) in subsection (b)--
            (A) in paragraph (7)(C), by striking ``or'' at the end;
            (B) in paragraph (8)(G), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``; or''; and
            (C) by adding at the end the following:
        ``(9) the sale or lease of a condominium unit that is not 
    exempt under subsection (a).''; and
        (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(d) For purposes of subsection (b), the term `condominium unit' 
means a unit of residential or commercial property to be designated for 
separate ownership pursuant to a condominium plan or declaration 
provided that upon conveyance--
        ``(1) the owner of such unit will have sole ownership of the 
    unit and an undivided interest in the common elements appurtenant 
    to the unit; and
        ``(2) the unit will be an improved lot.''.
SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.
    The amendments made by this Act shall take effect 180 days after 
the date of the enactment of this Act.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Arrow Resources Development, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Peter J. Frugone, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | i. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | ii. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                            
|----------------------------
|                            
|/s/ Peter J. Frugone        
|Principal Accounting Officer
|March 16, 2006
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO.: 4:03cr53-SPM

BRIDGETT NICOLE MALONE,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR EARLY TERMINATION

This cause comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Early

Terminate Supervised Release (doc. 41) and the response in opposition (doc.

42) filed by the Government. Although Defendant’s compliance with her current

terms of supervised release shows promise for her future, it would not be in the

interests of justice to terminate Defendant’s supervised release given her prior

violation of release conditions and criminal history. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: Defendant’s Motion to Early Terminate

Supervised Release (doc. 41) is denied. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 16th day of March, 2011.

s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
###### Editorial Note on Part 3405

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3405 appear at 76 FR 4808, Jan. 27, 2011.

#### § 3405.9 Use of funds for facilities.

Under the Higher Education Challenge Grants Program, the use of grant funds to plan, acquire, or construct a building or facility is not allowed. With prior approval, in accordance with the cost principles set forth in 2 CFR part 200, some grant funds may be used for minor alterations, renovations, or repairs deemed necessary to retrofit existing teaching spaces in order to carry out a funded project. However, requests to use grant funds for such purposes must demonstrate that the alterations, renovations, or repairs are incidental to the major purpose for which a grant is made.

[62 FR 39317, July 22, 1997, as amended at 79 FR 75999, Dec. 19, 2014]
§ 3430.507 Program requirements. ( a ) *General.* Grants under this subpart shall address priorities in the United States agriculture that involve integrated research, extension, and education activities as determined by the Secretary through Agency stakeholder input processes and in consultation with the Advisory Board.
( b ) *Duration of awards.* The term of a grant under this subpart may not exceed 5 years.
§ 28.908 Samples. ( a ) *Only one sample to be submitted.* Only one sample from each bale of eligible cotton shall be submitted for classification under this subpart. This does not prohibit the submission of an additional sample from a bale for review classification if the producer so desires.
( b ) *Drawing of samples manual.* ( 1 ) Each cut sample shall be drawn from the bale after it is tied out following the ginning process, and shall be approximately 6 ounces in weight, not less than 3 ounces of which are to be drawn from each side of the bale: *Provided,* That each sample from a bale of American Pima cotton shall be approximately 10 ounces in weight, not less than 5 ounces of which are to be drawn from each side of the bale.
( 2 ) Where it is necessary to draw two sets of samples, a single cut should be made in each side of the bale, and the portion of cotton removed from each cut should be broken in half across the layers to provide two complete samples. In those cases where this method would result in samples of insufficient length, it will be acceptable to split the sample lengthwise along the layers, provided the outside portion from each side is submitted for the official classification.
( c ) *Mechanical sampling.* Samples may be drawn in gins equipped with mechanical samplers approved by the Division and operated according to sampling instructions furnished by the Director or an authorized representative. Such samples shall not be less than 6 ounces in weight.
( d ) *Samples must be representative.* Each sample must be representative of the bale from which drawn.
( e ) *Handling samples.* Samples shall not be dressed or trimmed and shall be carefully handled in such manner as not to cause loss of leaf, sand, or other material, or otherwise change their representative character. Samples shall be handled only by employees of the licensee prior to shipment or delivery to the cotton classing office of the Division.
( f ) *Identifying and shipping samples.* Each sample shall be identified with a tag, supplied or approved by the Division, bearing the gin or warehouse number of the bale from which the sample was drawn and the name and address of the producer of the bale. The tag shall be placed between the two halves of the sample, the sample tightly rolled and enclosed in a package or bag for shipment. Each package or bag shall be labeled or marked with the name and address of the licensed gin or warehouse. The packages shall be shipped or delivered direct to the cotton classing office serving the territory in which the cotton is ginned. Samples that were drawn by a mechanical sampler at the gin may be transported with the bales to the warehouse and then shipped or delivered direct to the classing office by the warehouse.
( g ) *Request for classification.* Samples received from a licensed gin or warehouse with the identification tag required in § 28.908(f) shall constitute a request for classification service by the producer.