Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 227 / Friday, November 26, 2010 / Notices 72787 

would be the case if BIS had to detect 

the violations without such disclosures. 

Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations; not-for-profit 

institutions. 

Frequency: On occasion. 

Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary. 

OMB Desk Officer: Jasmeet Seehra, 

(202) 395–3123. 

Copies of the above information 

collection proposal can be obtained by 

calling or writing Diana Hynek, 

Departmental Paperwork Clearance 

Officer, (202) 482–0266, Department of 

Commerce, Room 6616, 14th and 

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 

DC 20230 (or via the Internet at 

dHynek@doc.gov.) 

Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

information collection should be sent 

within 30 days of publication of this 

notice to Jasmeet Seehra, OMB Desk 

Officer, via by e-mail 

Jasmeet_K._Seehra@omb.eop.gov, or fax 

to (202) 395–5167. 

Dated: November 19, 2010. 

Gwellnar Banks, 

Management Analyst, Office of the Chief 

Information Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2010–29684 Filed 11–24–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–33–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request 

The Department of Commerce will 

submit to the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) for clearance the 

following proposal for collection of 

information under the provisions of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 

chapter 35). 

Agency: National Institute of 

Standards and Technology (NIST). 

Title: Manufacturing Extension 

Partnership (MEP) Expanded Services 

Center Information and Reporting 

System. 

OMB Control Number: None. 

Form Number(s): None. 

Type of Request: Regular submission. 

Number of Respondents: 60. 

Average Hours per Response: 80. 

Burden Hours: 4,800. 

Needs and Uses: Sponsored by the 

National institute of Standards and 

Technology (NIST), the Manufacturing 

Extension Partnership (MEP) is a 

national network of locally-based 

manufacturing extension Competitive 

Award Recipients working with small 

manufacturers to assist in improving 

their productivity, profitability, and 

enhance their economic 

competitiveness. This collection will 

provide information regarding MEP 

Competitive Award Recipient 

performance of the delivery of 

technology and business solutions to 

U.S.-based manufacturers. 

The information will also assist in 

determining the performance of the 

MEP Competitive Award Recipients at 

both local and national levels, will 

provide information critical to 

monitoring and reporting on MEP 

programmatic performance, and will 

assist management in policy decisions. 

Responses to the collection of 

information are mandatory per the 

regulations governing the operation of 

the MEP Program (15 CFR parts 290, 

291, 292, and H.R. 1274—section 2). 

The information will include the 

recipient inputs and activities including 

services delivered, clients served, 

Competitive Award Recipient staff, 

quarterly expenses and revenues, 

partners and affiliates, strategic plan, 

operating plans, and client success 

stories. 

Affected Public: NIST MEP 

Competitive Award Recipients. 

Frequency: Quarterly. 

Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory. 

OMB Desk Officer: Jasmeet Seehra, 

(202) 395–3123. 

Copies of the above information 

collection proposal can be obtained by 

calling or writing Diana Hynek, 

Departmental Paperwork Clearance 

Officer, (202) 482–0266, Department of 

Commerce, Room 6616, 14th and 

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 

DC 20230 (or via the Internet at 

dHynek@doc.gov). 

Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

information collection should be sent 

within 30 days of publication of this 

notice to OMB Desk Officer, Jasmeet 

Seehra, FAX Number (202) 395–5167, or 

via Jasmeet_K._Seehra@omb.eop.gov. 

Dated: November 22, 2010. 

Gwellnar Banks, 

Management Analyst, Office of the Chief 

Information Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2010–29723 Filed 11–24–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

Proposed Information Collection; 

Comment Request; Dam Owner Survey 

to Support Management of Gulf of 

Maine Distinct Population Segment 

(GOM DPS) of Atlantic Salmon 

AGENCY: National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration, 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of 

Commerce, as part of its continuing 

effort to reduce paperwork and 

respondent burden, invites the general 

public and other Federal agencies to 

take this opportunity to comment on 

proposed and/or continuing information 

collections, as required by the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

submitted on or before January 25, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments 

to Diana Hynek, Departmental 

Paperwork Clearance Officer, 

Department of Commerce, Room 6616, 

14th and Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20230 (or via the 

Internet at dHynek@doc.gov). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Requests for additional information or 

copies of the information collection 

instrument and instructions should be 

directed to Tara Trinko, 207–866–4238 

or Tara.Trinko@noaa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Abstract 

This is a request for a new 

information collection. 

In 2009, Atlantic salmon populations 

from the Androscoggin River in South 

Central Maine to the Dennys River in 

Eastern Maine were listed as 

Endangered under the Federal 

Endangered Species Act (ESA) (74 FR 

29344, June 19, 2009). Dams were 

identified in the listing as a significant 

threat to the species survival and 

recovery. In order for recovery to occur, 

Atlantic salmon must have access to 

sufficient adult spawning habitat and 

juvenile rearing habitat to support the 

continued existence of a recovered 

salmon population. In furtherance of 

recovery, the National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS) proposes to conduct a 

survey of dam owners. 

This survey will allow NMFS to 

identify owners of non-Federal Energy 

Regulatory Commission (FERC) 

regulated dams and present to them 

opportunities to participate in programs 

that will aid them in complying with 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
72788 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 227 / Friday, November 26, 2010 / Notices 

1See Dongguan Bon Ten Furniture Co., Ltd. v. 

United States, Court No. 09–00396: Final Results of 

Redetermination Pursuant To Remand, dated 

August 9, 2010 (‘‘Remand Results’’); see also 

Dongguan Bon Ten Furniture Co., Ltd. v. United 

States, Slip Op. 2010–106 (September 17, 2010) 

(‘‘Bon Ten v. United States’’). 

2See Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the 

People’s Republic of China: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and New 

Shipper Reviews, 74 FR 41374 (August 17, 2009) 

(‘‘Final Results’’), and accompanying Issues and 

Decision Memorandum, as amended by Wooden 

Bedroom Furniture From the People’s Republic of 

China: Amended Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review and New Shipper 

Reviews, 74 FR 55810 (October 29, 2009) 

(‘‘Amended Final Results’’). 

3See Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the 

People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Fourth 

New Shipper Reviews, 73 FR 64916 (October 31, 

2008) (‘‘NSR Final Results’’). 

4See Final Results at Comment 29. 

5See id. 

the ESA. Owners of non-FERC dams 

often do not have regulatory oversight 

by a Federal agency and therefore, may 

not be aware of the requirements of the 

ESA and what this means to them. This 

survey will identify opportunities for 

fish passage improvements or dam 

removal that may fit into existing 

funding programs directed towards 

improving fish passage for diadromous 

fish species. Information from this 

survey will also be collected to educate 

NOAA on the current use, anticipated 

use, and community interest in small 

dams. This type of information will aid 

NMFS in developing tools to 

communicate and work effectively with 

dam owners within the GOM DPS. 

Information will be collected on current 

uses of dams, anticipated uses of dams, 

important issues or concerns to dam 

owners, and owners’ interest in creating 

fish passage or removing dams. Known 

associations or organizations with an 

interest in the dams will also be 

identified. 

Respondents will represent members 

of state and local agencies, private 

individuals and corporations, and 

commercial businesses. Results will be 

used to assist NMFS in identifying dam 

owners who are interested in discussing 

potential enhancements to Atlantic 

salmon habitats. 

II. Method of Collection 

The geographic spread of potential 

respondents is extensive and includes 

residents of Maine as well as 

nonresidents. Most respondents will be 

contacted via an initial letter and a 

follow-up telephone call. Personal 

interviews will be scheduled with a few 

respondents owning multiple (in excess 

of 5) dams and the information collected 

will be recorded electronically. 

III. Data 

OMB Control Number: None. 

Form Number: None. 

Type of Review: Regular submission 

(new information collection). 

Affected Public: Individuals or 

households, non-profit institutions; 

State, local, or tribal government; 

Federal government, business or other 

for-profit organizations. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

309. 

Estimated Time Per Response: 7 

minutes. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden 

Hours: 36. 

Estimated Total Annual Cost to 

Public: $0 for record keeping/reporting. 

IV. Request for Comments 

Comments are invited on: (a) Whether 

the proposed collection of information 

is necessary for the proper performance 

of the functions of the agency, including 

whether the information shall have 

practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden 

(including hours and cost) of the 

proposed collection of information; 

(c) ways to enhance the quality, 

utility, and clarity of the information to 

be collected; and (d) ways to minimize 

the burden of the collection of 

information on respondents, including 

through the use of automated collection 

techniques or other forms of information 

technology. 

Comments submitted in response to 

this notice will be summarized and/or 

included in the request for OMB 

approval of this information collection; 

they also will become a matter of public 

record. 

Dated: November 22, 2010. 

Gwellnar Banks, 

Management Analyst, Office of the Chief 

Information Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2010–29722 Filed 11–24–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–22–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–890] 

Wooden Bedroom Furniture From the 

People’s Republic of China: Amended 

Final Results Pursuant to a Final Court 

Decision 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On September 17, 2010, the 

United States Court of International 

Trade (the ‘‘Court’’ or ‘‘CIT’’) sustained 

the U.S. Department of Commerce’s (the 

‘‘Department’s’’) final results of 

redetermination pursuant to remand, 

wherein the Department determined to 

rescind the administrative review (‘‘AR’’) 

with respect to Dongguan Bon Ten 

Furniture Co., Ltd. (‘‘Bon Ten’’) pursuant 

to 19 CFR 351.214(j) and 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(3).1 The period of review 

(‘‘POR’’) is January 1, 2007, through 

December 31, 2007. As the Court’s 

decision is now final and conclusive, 

the Department is amending the final 

results of the 2007 AR of wooden 

bedroom furniture (‘‘WBF’’) from the 

People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) to 

reflect the Department’s redetermination 

to rescind the AR with respect to Bon 

Ten.2

DATES: Effective Date: November 26, 

2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Frances Veith, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 8, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–4295. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

On August 17, 2009, the Department 

published its Final Results. In response 

to Bon Ten’s arguments in its 

administrative case brief, the 

Department determined not to rescind 

the AR with respect to Bon Ten because 

Bon Ten had not demonstrated that it 

had no shipments during the 2007 AR 

POR outside of the single shipment 

reviewed during a new shipper review 

(‘‘NSR’’) 3 that overlapped, in part, with 

the 2007 AR POR.4 Additionally, 

because Bon Ten had not demonstrated 

its eligibility for a separate rate in the 

2007 AR, the Department maintained its 

determination to treat Bon Ten as part 

of the PRC-wide entity.5

On August 14, 2009, Bon Ten 

submitted comments alleging that the 

Department made a ministerial error 

with respect to the Final Results. Bon 

Ten’s ministerial error allegation 

focused on the Department’s finding in 

the Final Results that Bon Ten had not 

provided any assertion prior to the 

submission of its case brief that it had 

no shipments during the 2007 AR POR 

outside of the shipment reviewed in the 

context of the NSR. Bon Ten argued that 

the Department did not consider its 

February 5, 2009, submission 

concerning its shipments during the 

2007 AR POR in that finding. 

In the Amended Final Results, the 

Department determined that, although it 

had inadvertently overlooked Bon Ten’s 

February 5, 2009, submission for 

purposes of the Final Results, Bon Ten’s 

allegation did not reflect a ministerial 

error. The Department reasoned that 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES