alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. 4:93cr4028-WS

KARIM SHAREEF MATEEN, 4:09cv105-WS

a/k/a REGINALD MARCEL DENNIS,

Defendant.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc.

1016) docketed March 25, 2009. The magistrate judge recommends that the

defendant's "Petition for Redress of Grievances" be summarily dismissed. The

defendant has filed objections (doc. 1017) to the report and recommendation.

Upon review of the record in light of the defendant’s objections, the court has

determined that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation must be adopted. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 1016) is adopted

and incorporated by reference in this order of the court.

Case 4:93-cr-04028-WS-WCS Document 1019 Filed 04/17/09 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No 4:88cr4045-WS

2. The defendant’s "Petition for Redress of Grievances" (doc. 1012) is summarily

DISMISSED as an unauthorized second or successive section 2255 motion.

3. The defendant's "Demand for Concurrence Form" (doc. 1013) is DENIED..

3. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and shall close Case No.

4:09cv105-WS.

DONE AND ORDERED this 17th day of April , 2009.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:93-cr-04028-WS-WCS Document 1019 Filed 04/17/09 Page 2 of 2
IB 

House Calendar No. 59 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2251 

[Report No. 113–234] 

To designate the United States courthouse located at 118 South Mill Street, 

in Fergus Falls, Minnesota, as the ‘‘Edward J. Devitt United States 

Courthouse’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 4, 2013 

Mr. PETERSON (for himself, Mr. WALZ, Mr. KLINE, Mr. PAULSEN, Ms. 

MCCOLLUM, Mr. ELLISON, Mrs. BACHMANN, and Mr. NOLAN) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 

and Infrastructure 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2013 

Reported with amendments, referred to the House Calendar, and ordered to 

be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2251 RH

A BILL 

To designate the United States courthouse located at 118 

South Mill Street, in Fergus Falls, Minnesota, as the 

‘‘Edward J. Devitt United States Courthouse’’. 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2251 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

4 The United States courthouse located at 118 South 

5 Mill Street, in Fergus Falls, Minnesota, shall be known 

6 and designated as the ‘‘Edward J. Devitt United States 

7 Courthouse’’. 

8 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

9 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

10 paper, or other record of the United States to the United 

11 States courthouse referred to in section 1 shall be deemed 

12 to be a reference to the ‘‘Edward J. Devitt United States 

13 Courthouse’’. 

14 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

15 The United States courthouse and Federal building lo16 cated at 118 South Mill Street, in Fergus Falls, Minnesota, 

17 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Edward J. Devitt 

18 United States Courthouse and Federal Building’’. 

19 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

20 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

21 paper, or other record of the United States to the United 

22 States courthouse and Federal building referred to in sec23 tion 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Edward 

24 J. Devitt United States Courthouse and Federal Building’’. 

Amend the title so as to read: ‘‘A bill to designate 

the United States courthouse and Federal building loVerDate Mar 15 2010 21:11 Sep 27, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2251.RH H2251

sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
4 

•HR 2251 RH

cated at 118 South Mill Street, in Fergus Falls, Minnesota, as the ‘Edward J. Devitt United States Courthouse and Federal Building’.’’. 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS

sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 59 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2251 

[Report No. 113–234] 

A BILL 

To designate the United States courthouse located 

Courthouse’’. nesota, as the ‘‘Edward J. Devitt United States at 118 South Mill Street, in Fergus Falls, MinSEPTEMBER 27, 2013 

Reported with amendments, referred to the House 

Calendar, and ordered to be printed 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
98-876.

#### Fioretti v. Lottery Channel, Inc.

Hamilton App. Nos. C-970320 and C-970321. Reported at 82 Ohio St.3d 1453, 695 N.E.2d 1150. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Douglas, J., dissents.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Joseph De Pasquale, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered on March 1, 1979, unanimously affirmed. The case is remitted to the Supreme Court, Bronx County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL *752460.50 (subd 5). No opinion. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Fein, Sandler, Bloom and Yesawich, JJ.
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNTIED STATES CODE,


as
adopted pursuant to


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of
Theragenics Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Francis J. Tarallo, Chief Financial Officer,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates
and for the periods referred to in the Report.






Date:
March 13, 2008







/s/ Francis J.
Tarallo


Francis
J. Tarallo


Chief
Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Arrow Resources Development, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Peter J. Frugone, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | i. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | ii. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|                                                       
|/s/ Peter J. Frugone                                   
|Peter J. Frugone Chief Executive Officer April 17th2006
#### PEOPLE, Appellants, v. SIMPSON, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 12, 1906.)

Proceedings by the people of the state of New York against James W. Simpson.

No opinion. Order affirmed.
#### Florence Black, appellee, v. Warren H. Gleasman, appellant.

Gen. No. 8,816.

*628Opinion filed November 15, 1934.

David D. Madden and Loretta Laden, for appellant. Miller & Thomas, for appellee; Chas. A. Thomas, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Huffman

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### Winifred Spadaro et al., Appellants, v Consolidated Edison Company of New York et al., Defendants, and Baker-Firestone, Inc., Respondent.

— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated April 6, 1979, which granted the motion of defendant Baker-Firestone, Inc. (Baker) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as to it. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. On September 27, 1977 the plaintiff wife allegedly fell in front of premises at 64 Sagamore Road, Bronxville, and sustained injuries. At the time, defendants Consolidated Edison Company of New York and New Rochelle Water Company were doing construction work in the immediate vicinity of the scene of the accident. In moving to dismiss the complaint as against it, Baker showed by documentary evidence, i.e., a "Declaration of 64 Sagamore Road Condominium” (pursuant to article 9-B of the Real Property Law), that it had conveyed the subject premises on September 1, 1977, 26 days prior to the accident date. The recording date of that document is also September 1, *6171977. As a consequence, Baker was out of both title and possession on September 1, 1977. In opposition to the motion, Benedict Spadaro, the coplaintiff husband with a derivative cause of action, but who was not present at the scene at the time of the accident, stated in an affidavit: "The premises commonly known as 64 Sagamore Road abut the sidewalk area with a stone wall. On top of the stone wall there was installed by, *I believe,*Baker-Firestone, small round stones of varying size which stones would commonly run off the wall either with rain or in time and fall upon the sidewalk in the street area. When my wife fell, *she was caused to fall not only by the roughen [sic] uneven area of the sidewalk but also because of the presence of stones which were in those rough and uneven areas”*(emphasis supplied). No affidavit of Winifred Spadaro appears in the record, nor does it appear that she was unavailable to execute and submit one. CPLR 3212 (subd [b]) directs that "The motion [for summary judgment] shall be granted if, upon all the papers and proof submitted, the cause of action * * * shall be established sufficiently to warrant the court as a matter of law in directing judgment in favor of any party.” (See *Andre v Pomeroy,*35 NY2d 361, 364.) At bar we have nothing but hearsay—and conclusory hearsay at that—submitted in an attempt to defeat the motion. Accordingly, we affirm. Mollen, P. J., Titone, O’Connor, Cohalan and Hargett, JJ., concur.
II 

Calendar No. 256 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 255 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 9, 2013 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 

AN ACT 

To amend certain definitions contained in the Provo River 

Project Transfer Act for purposes of clarifying certain 

property descriptions, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CLARIFYING CERTAIN PROPERTY DESCRIP4 TIONS IN PROVO RIVER PROJECT TRANSFER 

5 ACT. 

6 (a) PLEASANT GROVE PROPERTY.—Section 2(4)(A) 

7 of the Provo River Project Transfer Act (Public Law 108– 

8 382; 118 Stat. 2212) is amended by striking ‘‘of enact9 ment of this Act’’ and inserting ‘‘on which the parcel is 

10 conveyed under section 3(a)(2)’’. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 255 PCS

1 (b) PROVO RESERVOIR CANAL.—Section 2(5) of the 

2 Provo River Project Transfer Act (Public Law 108–382; 

3 118 Stat. 2212) is amended— 

4 (1) by striking ‘‘canal, and any associated land, 

5 rights-of-way, and facilities’’ and inserting ‘‘water 

6 conveyance facility historically known as the Provo 

7 Reservoir Canal and all associated bridges, fixtures, 

8 structures, facilities, lands, interests in land, and 

9 rights-of-way held,’’; 

10 (2) by inserting ‘‘and forebay’’ after ‘‘Diversion 

11 Dam’’; 

12 (3) by inserting ‘‘near the Jordan Narrows to 

13 the point where water is discharged to the Welby14 Jacob Canal and the Utah Lake Distributing Canal’’ 

15 after ‘‘Penstock’’; and 

16 (4) by striking ‘‘of enactment of this Act’’ and 

17 inserting ‘‘on which the Provo Reservoir Canal is 

18 conveyed under section 3(a)(1)’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 3, 

2013. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS

smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 256 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 255 

AN ACT 

To amend certain definitions contained in the 

other purposes. clarifying certain property descriptions, and for Provo River Project Transfer Act for purposes of 

DECEMBER 9, 2013 

Received; read twice and placed on the calendar 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Case 4:03-cv-00307-RH-WCS Document 2 Filed 09/24/03 Page 1 of 1
149 So.2d 765

#### STATE of Louisiana v. J. Bernard COCKE.

No. 40577.

Feb. 8, 1963.

’ Writ-of'mandamus denied, but alternative request granted. ' It is doubtful that Judge’ Shirley G. Wimberly has herein an interest such as' is contemplated by R.S. 15:303(1) and which would legally warrant -his recusation (see State v. Phillips, 159' La. 903, 106 So. 375 and State v. Laborde, 214 La. 644, 38 So.2d 371). Nevertheless, we are of the opinion that the unusual and peculiar circumstances surrounding this proceeding furnish sufficient cause for and require (in securing the prompt, efficient and proper administration of justice) our granting applicant’s alternative request tO' appoint a judge from another judicial dis-’ trict in this state to sit in Section G of the Criminal District Court of Orleans Parish,, and to dispose of the rule for contempt in question (Article 7, Section 12 of the Louisiana Constitution of 1921). Accord-' ingly, a special order will be executed for such appointment.
§ 3.79 Review of USDA records related to the debt. ( a ) *Notification by employee.* An employee who intends to inspect or copy USDA records related to the debt must send a letter to USDA stating his or her intention. The letter must be received by USDA within 30 days of the date of the Notice of Intent to Offset Salary.
( b ) *USDA response.* In response to the timely notice submitted by the debtor as described in paragraph (a) of this section, USDA will notify the employee of the location and time when the employee may inspect and copy USDA records related to the debt.
##### 



Exhibit 23.2 MILLER AND LENTS, LTD. Consent of Independent Petroleum Engineers Encore Acquisition
Company777 Main Street, Suite 1400Fort Worth, Texas 76102 The firm of Miller and Lents, Ltd. hereby consents to the use of its name
and to the reference to its report regarding the Encore Acquisition Company
Proved Reserves and Future Net Revenues as of December 31, 2003, in the annual
report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 filed by Encore
Acquisition Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Very truly yours,MILLER AND LENTS, LTD.By:    /s/ CARL D. RICHARDCarl D. RichardVice President
 Houston, Texas
March 9, 2004
Description of Compensatary Arrangements



 Exhibit 10.12 
  
 SimpleTech, Inc. 
  
 Description of Compensatory Arrangements for 2005 
 Applicable to Named Executive Officers 
  
 Set forth below are 2005 annual base pay arrangements applicable to SimpleTech, Inc.’s (the “Company”) current executive officers who will be named in the summary compensation table of the Company’s proxy statement for
the 2005 annual meeting of shareholders (“Named Executive Officers”). These arrangements are in addition to the various other compensatory plans, contracts and arrangements in which the Company’s Named Executive Officers participate
and which are filed or incorporated by reference as exhibits to this report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. 
  

						
	 Named Executive Officer

	  	 Title

	  	2005 Annual Base Salary


	 Manouch Moshayedi
	  	Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors	  	$	500,000
			
	 Mike Moshayedi
	  	President	  	$	375,000
			
	 Mark Moshayedi
	  	Chief Operating Officer, Chief Technical Officer and Secretary	  	$	440,000
			
	 Dan Moses
	  	Chief Financial Officer	  	$	300,000
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2326 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special resource 

study of the Medgar Evers House, located in Jackson, Mississippi, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 11, 2013 

Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a 

special resource study of the Medgar Evers House, located in Jackson, Mississippi, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medgar Evers House 

5 Study Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY. 

7 (a) STUDY.—The Secretary of the Interior shall con8 duct a special resource study of the home of the late civil 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 2326 IH

1 rights activist Medgar Evers, located at 2332 Margaret 

2 Walker Alexander Drive in Jackson, Mississippi. 

3 (b) CONTENTS.—In conducting the study under sub4 section (a), the Secretary shall— 

5 (1) evaluate the national significance of the 

6 site; 

7 (2) determine the suitability and feasibility of 

8 designating the site as a unit of the National Park 

9 System; 

10 (3) consider other alternatives for preservation, 

11 protection, and interpretation of the site by Federal, 

12 State, or local governmental entities, or private and 

13 nonprofit organizations; 

14 (4) consult with interested Federal, State, or 

15 local governmental entities, private and nonprofit or16 ganizations or any other interested individuals; and 

17 (5) identify cost estimates for any Federal ac18 quisition, development, interpretation, operation, and 

19 maintenance associated with the alternatives. 

20 (c) APPLICABLE LAW.—The study required under 

21 subsection (a) shall be conducted in accordance with sec22 tion 8 of National Park Service General Authorities Act 

23 (16 U.S.C. 1a–5). 

24 (d) REPORT.—Not later than 3 years after the date 

25 on which funds are first made available for the study 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•HR 2326 IH

1 under subsection (a), the Secretary shall submit to the 

2 Committee on Natural Resources of the House of Rep3 resentatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural 

4 Resources of the Senate a report containing the results 

5 of the study and any conclusions and recommendations of 

6 the Secretary. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### § 29.3104 Rule 1.

Each grade shall be treated as a subdivision of a particular type. When the grade is stated in an inspection certificate, the type also shall be stated.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

SAMUEL ROY ABRAM,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 3:20cv4291-MCR-HTC

SENIOR DISTRICT COURT 

JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER,

MAGISTRATE JUDGE MILES DAVIS,

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 

GREGORY R MILLER, and

ASSISTANT UNITED STATES 

ATTORNEY STEPHEN P PRIESSER,

Defendants.

/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation dated March 12, 2020. ECF No. 3. The parties have been 

furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an 

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 

636(b)(1). Plaintiff filed an objection, ECF No. 4, and the Court has conducted a de 

novo review of the objected-to portions of the Report and Recommendation.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that 

the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:20cv4291-MCR-HTC

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

(1)The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 3, is 

adopted, over the objection of Plaintiff, and incorporated by reference in 

this Order.

(2)Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), the Plaintiff’s complaint, ECF No. 1, is 

DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to Plaintiff initiating a new cause 

of action accompanied by payment of the $400.00 filing fee in its entirety

(3)The Clerk is directed to close this matter.

DONE AND ORDERED this 8th day of April 2020.

s/M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
#### § 29.3151 Flyings (X Group).

This group consists of leaves normally grown at the bottom of the stalk. These leaves are flat and open-faced and have a blunt or oblate tip. Compared with other groups on the stalk, Flyings consist of relatively thin to tissuey leaves which show the highest degree of maturity and the most open leaf structure. Flyings show a material amount of injury characteristic of leaves grown near the ground. (See Rule 14.)

| Grades | Grade names and specifications |
| --- | --- |
| X1L | Choice Buff Flyings. |
| | Tissuey, mellow, open to porous, even, clear finish, strong color intensity, 95 percent uniform, and 5 percent injury tolerance. |
| X2L | Fine Buff Flyings. |
| | Tissuey, mellow, open to porous, even, moderate finish and color intensity, 90 percent uniform, and 10 percent injury tolerance. |
| X3L | Good Buff Flyings. |
| | Tissuey, ripe to mellow, open to porous, wavy, dull finish, weak color intensity, 80 percent uniform, and 20 percent injury tolerance. |
| X4L | Fair Buff Flyings. |
| | Tissuey, mature to ripe, open to porous, wrinkly to wavy, dingy finish, pale color intensity, 70 percent uniform, and 30 percent injury tolerance. |
| X5L | Low Buff Flyings. |
| | Tissuey, mature to ripe, open to porous, wrinkly, dingy finish, pale color intensity, 60 percent uniform, and 40 percent injury tolerance. |
| X1F | Choice Tan Flyings. |
| | Thin, mellow, open to porous, even, clear finish, strong color intensity, 95 percent uniform, and 5 percent injury tolerance. |
| X2F | Fine Tan Flyings. |
| | Thin, mellow, open to porous, even, moderate finish and color intensity, 90 percent uniform, and 10 percent injury tolerance. |
| X3F | Good Tan Flyings. |
| | Thin, ripe to mellow, open to porous, wavy, dull finish, weak color intensity, 80 percent uniform, and 20 percent injury tolerance. |
| X4F | Fair Tan Flyings. |
| | Thin, mature to ripe, open to porous, wrinkly to wavy, dingy finish, pale color intensity, 70 percent uniform, and 30 percent injury tolerance. |
| X5F | Low Tan Flyings. |
| | Thin, mature to ripe, open to porous, wrinkly, dingy finish, pale color intensity, 60 percent uniform, and 40 percent injury tolerance. |
| X4M | Fair Mixed Color Flyings. |
| | Medium to tissuey body, mature to ripe, firm to porous, wrinkly to wavy, dingy finish, pale color intensity, 70 percent uniform, and 30 percent injury tolerance. |
| X5M | Low Mixed Color Flyings. |
| | Medium to tissuey body, mature to ripe, firm to porous, wrinkly, dingy finish, pale color intensity, 60 percent uniform, and 40 percent injury tolerance. |
| X4G | Fair Green Flyings. |
| | Medium to tissuey body, immature, firm, wrinkly to wavy, dingy finish, 70 percent uniform, and 30 percent injury tolerance. |
| X5G | Low Green Flyings. |
| | Medium to tissuey body, immature, firm, wrinkly, dingy finish, 60 percent uniform, and 40 percent injury tolerance. |

[24 FR 8771, Oct. 29, 1959, as amended at 35 FR 10490, June 27, 1970; 49 FR 16758, Apr. 20, 1984]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

STEVEN DOUGLAS GEBHART,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 771 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 1st day of April, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.