alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 300

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 300 appear at 69 FR 18803, Apr. 9, 2004.

#### § 300.1 [Reserved]
§ 301.75-12 Certificates and limited permits. ( a ) *Issuance and withdrawal.* ( 1 ) Certificates and limited permits may be issued for the interstate movement of regulated articles only by an inspector or by persons operating under a compliance agreement.
( 2 ) A certificate or limited permit may be withdrawn by an inspector if the inspector determines that any of the applicable requirements of this subpart have not been met. The decision of the inspector and the reason for the withdrawal must be confirmed in writing as promptly as circumstances allow. Any person whose certificate or limited permit is withdrawn may appeal the decision in writing to the Administrator within 10 days after receiving the written notification. The appeal must state all of the facts and reasons upon which the person relies to show that the certificate or limited permit was wrongfully withdrawn. The Administrator must grant or deny the appeal in writing, stating the reasons for the decision, as promptly as circumstances allow. If there is a conflict as to any material fact, a hearing will be held to resolve the conflict. Rules of practice concerning the hearing will be adopted by the Administrator.
( b ) *Attachment and disposition.* ( 1 ) Except as provided in § 301.75-6(b)(8) for kumquat plants, or in § 301.75-6(c)(4) through (c)(5) for any regulated nursery stock, certificates and limited permits accompanying regulated articles interstate must be attached during the interstate movement to one of the following: ( i ) The outside of the regulated article, if the regulated article is not packed in a container, or
( ii ) The outside of the container in which the regulated article is packed, or
( iii ) The consignee's copy of the accompanying waybill, but only if the regulated article is described on the certificate, limited permit, or waybill in a way that allows the regulated article to be identified.
( 2 ) Certificates and limited permits accompanying regulated articles interstate must be given to the consignee at the point of destination.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0363) [55 FR 37453, Sept. 11, 1990, as amended at 72 FR 13428, Mar. 22, 2007; 74 FR 16104, Apr. 9, 2009; 76 FR 23457, Apr. 27, 2011; 88 FR 85470, Dec. 8, 2023]
#### § 2901.1 Purpose and scope.

The purpose of this part 2901 is to provide procedures for the making of certain adjustments to the Secretary of Agriculture's Essential Agricultural Uses and Requirements regulations in accordance with section 502(c) of the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978, in order to prevent special hardship, inequity, or an unfair distribution of burdens. The procedures in this part 2901 apply to any person seeking an interpretation of, modification of, rescission of, exception of, or exemption from the Essential Agricultural Uses and Requirements regulations in part 2900 of this chapter.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DANIEL ELOY ROMERO,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

GAY; ARIZONA ATTORNEY

GENERAL,

 Respondents - Appellees.

No. 07-16353

D.C. No. CV-04-00825-FJM

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Frederick J. Martone, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 12, 2011** 

San Francisco, California

Before: HUG, SCHROEDER, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

Arizona state prisoner Daniel Eloy Romero appeals from the district court’s

judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition as untimely. We have

jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm. 

FILED

JAN 19 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

 The district court did not err by finding that Romero’s federal habeas

petition is barred by the one-year statute of limitations of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1).

Romero is not entitled to statutory tolling under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(2) because

his February 2003 letter requesting sentence clarification can not be construed as a

“properly filed application for State post-conviction relief or other collateral

review . . . .” 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(2). Furthermore, Romero is not entitled to

equitable tolling because he has failed to demonstrate the existence of

extraordinary circumstances beyond his control that made it impossible for him to

file a petition on time. Spitsyn v. Moore, 345 F.3d 796, 799 (9th Cir. 2003). 

In light of the foregoing disposition, we decline to consider the merits of

Romero’s argument regarding the denial of earned release credits.

AFFIRMED.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northern Ethanol, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gordon
Laschinger, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                             /s/ Gordon Laschinger
                             ------------------------------
                             Gordon Laschinger
                             Principal Executive Officer
                             May 23, 2006
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:96cr80LAC

STEVEN ANTHONY GRAHAM

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on August 16, 2005

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION TO VACATE DISTRICT COURT ORDER DENYING MOTION

TO REOPEN HABEAS JUDGMENT AS A RESULT OF FRAUD UPON THE COURT

Filed byDEFENDANT PRO SE on8/5/05 Doc.# 121

RESPONSES:

on Doc.#

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

/s/ / Mary Maloy-Wells

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy-Wells

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 18th day of

August, 2005, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) 

 s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

United States District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 3:96-cr-00080-LC-CJK Document 122 Filed 08/19/05 Page 1 of 1
§ 250.3 Administration at the Federal level. ( a ) *Food and Nutrition Service.* Within the Department, Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) must act on behalf of the Department to administer the distribution of donated foods to distributing agencies for further distribution and use at the State level, in accordance with the requirements of this part.
( b ) *Audits or inspections.* The Department, the Comptroller General of the United States, or any of their authorized representatives, may conduct audits or inspections of distributing, subdistributing, or recipient agencies, or the commercial enterprises with which they have contracts or agreements, in order to determine compliance with the requirements of this part, or with other applicable Federal regulations.
( c ) *Suspension or termination.* Whenever it is determined that a distributing agency has materially failed to comply with the provisions of this part, or with other applicable Federal regulations, FNS may suspend or terminate the distribution of donated foods, or the provision of administrative funds, to the distributing agency. FNS must provide written notification of such suspension or termination of assistance, including the reasons for the action and the effective date. The distributing agency may appeal a suspension or termination of assistance if such appeal is provided for in Federal regulations applicable to a specific food assistance program (*e.g.,* as provided for in § 253.5(l) of this chapter for FDPIR). FNS may also take other actions, as appropriate, including prosecution under applicable Federal statutes.
§ 319.37-7 Marking and identity. ( a ) Any consignment of plants for planting for importation, other than by mail at the time of importation, or offer for importation into the United States shall plainly and correctly bear on the outer container (if in a container) or the plants for planting (if not in a container) the following information: ( 1 ) General nature and quantity of the contents;
( 2 ) Country and locality where grown;
( 3 ) Name and address of shipper, owner, or person shipping or forwarding the plants for planting;
( 4 ) Name and address of consignee;
( 5 ) Identifying shipper's mark and number; and
( 6 ) Number of written permit authorizing the importation, if one was required under § 319.37-5.
( b ) Any consignment of plants for planting for importation by mail shall be plainly and correctly addressed and mailed to the Plant Protection and Quarantine Programs at a port of entry listed in the Plants for Planting Manual as approved to receive imported plants for planting, shall be accompanied by a separate sheet of paper within the package plainly and correctly bearing the name, address, and telephone number of the intended recipient, and shall plainly and correctly bear on the outer container the following information: ( 1 ) General nature and quantity of the contents;
( 2 ) Country and locality where grown;
( 3 ) Name and address of shipper, owner, or person shipping or forwarding the plants for planting; and
( 4 ) Number of written permit authorizing the importation, if one was required under § 319.37-5.
( c ) Any consignment of plants for planting for importation (by mail or otherwise), at the time of importation or offer for importation into the United States shall be accompanied by an invoice or packing list indicating the contents of the consignment.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control numbers 0579-0190 and 0579-0319)
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Section 906 Certification**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C. Section 1350), the undersigned officer of Centennial Bank Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: November 13, 2006 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### Laura H. Avant, administratrix of the estate of Earl Avant, deceased, plaintiff in error, v. Macon F. Sanders and Mary Sanders, defendants in error.

Gen. No. 37,311.

Opinion filed October 24, 1934.

Edward H. Morris, for plaintiff in error. Albert B. George, for defendants in error.

Mr. Justice Wilson

delivered the opinion of the court.
IB 

Union Calendar No. 142 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2388 

[Report No. 113–195] 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to take certain Federal lands 

located in El Dorado County, California, into trust for the benefit of 

the Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 14, 2013 

Mr. MCCLINTOCK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

SEPTEMBER 10, 2013 

Reported with amendments, committed to the Committee of the Whole House 

on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on June 14, 2013] 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2388 RH

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to take certain 

Federal lands located in El Dorado County, California, 

into trust for the benefit of the Shingle Springs Band 

of Miwok Indians, and for other purposes. 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2388 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LAND INTO TRUST FOR THE SHINGLE SPRINGS 

4 BAND OF MIWOK INDIANS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The land described in subsection 

6 (b) is hereby taken into trust for the benefit of the Shingle 

7 Springs Band of Miwok Indians, subject to valid existing 

8 rights and management agreements related to easements 

9 and rights-of-way. 

10 (b) LAND DESCRIPTION.—The land taken into trust 

11 pursuant to subsection (a) is the approximately 40.852 

12 acres of Federal land under the administrative jurisdiction 

13 of the Bureau of Land Management identified as ‘‘Convey14 ance boundary’’ on the map titled ‘‘Shingle Springs Land 

15 Conveyance/Draft’’ and dated June 7, 2012, including im16 provements and appurtenances thereto. 

17 (c) GAMING.—Class II and class III gaming under the 

18 Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.) 

19 shall not be permitted at any time on the land taken into 

20 trust pursuant to subsection (a). 

Amend the title so as to read: ‘‘A bill to take certain 

Federal lands located in El Dorado County, California, 

into trust for the benefit of the Shingle Springs Band of 

Miwok Indians, and for other purposes.’’. 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 142 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2388 

[Report No. 113–195] 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to take 

other purposes. Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians, and for ty, California, into trust for the benefit of the certain Federal lands located in El Dorado CounSEPTEMBER 10, 2013 

Reported with amendments, committed to the Committee 

dered to be printed of the Whole House on the State of the Union, and orVerDate Mar 15 2010 21:03 Sep 10, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 6651 Sfmt 6651 E:\BILLS\H2388.RH H2388

sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Editorial Note on Part 3415
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3415 appear at 76 FR 4811, Jan. 27, 2011.

§ 3415.5 Evaluation and disposition of applications. ( a ) *Evaluation.* All proposals received from eligible applicants and submitted in accordance with deadlines established in the annual program solicitation shall be evaluated by the Director or Administrator through such officers, employees, and others as the Director or Administrator determines are uniquely qualified in the areas of research represented by particular projects. To assist in equitably and objectively evaluating proposals and to obtain the best possible balance of viewpoints, the Director or Administrator shall solicit the advice of peer scientists, *ad hoc* reviewers, or others who are recognized specialists in the areas covered by the applications received and whose general roles are defined in § 3415.2. Specific evaluations will be based upon the criteria established in subpart B, § 3415.15, unless NIFA and/or ARS determine that different criteria are necessary for the proper evaluation of proposals in one or more specific program areas, or for specific types of projects to be supported, and announces such criteria and their relative importance in the annual program solicitation. The overriding purpose of these evaluations is to provide information upon which the Director or Administrator may make an informed judgment in selecting proposals for support. Incomplete, unclear, or poorly organized applications will work to the detriment of applicants during the peer evaluation process. To ensure a comprehensive evaluation, all applications should be written with the care and thoroughness accorded papers for publication.
( b ) *Disposition.* On the basis of the Director's or Administrator's evaluation of an application in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section, the Director or Administrator will ( 1 ) approve support using currently available funds,
( 2 ) defer support due to lack of funds or a need for further evaluation, or
( 3 ) disapprove support for the proposed project in whole or in part. With respect to approved projects, the Director or Administrator will determine the project period (subject to extension as provided in § 3415.7(c)) during which the project may be supported. Any deferral or disapproval of an application will not preclude its reconsideration or a reapplication during subsequent fiscal years.
[58 FR 65647, Dec. 15, 1993, as amended at 80 FR 81738, Dec. 31, 2015]
# L_2021017EN.01000101.xml

| 20.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 17/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 17/1

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2021/42

of 19 January 2021

appointing a member of the Court of Auditors

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 286(5) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal by the Republic of Poland,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (1),

Whereas:

| (1) | By means of Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2016/640 (2), Mr Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI was appointed member of the Court of Auditors for the period from 7 May 2016 to 6 May 2022. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By means of Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2016/640 (2), Mr Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI was appointed member of the Court of Auditors for the period from 7 May 2016 to 6 May 2022.

| (2) | By letter of 27 November 2019, Mr Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI presented his resignation as member of the Court of Auditors with effect from 30 November 2019. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

By letter of 27 November 2019, Mr Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI presented his resignation as member of the Court of Auditors with effect from 30 November 2019.

| (3) | Following the resignation of Mr Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI, it is necessary for a new member to be appointed for the remainder of his term of office. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Following the resignation of Mr Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI, it is necessary for a new member to be appointed for the remainder of his term of office.

| (4) | The Republic of Poland has proposed the appointment of Mr Marek OPIOŁA as a member of the Court of Auditors for the period from 1 February 2021 to 6 May 2022, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The Republic of Poland has proposed the appointment of Mr Marek OPIOŁA as a member of the Court of Auditors for the period from 1 February 2021 to 6 May 2022,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Marek OPIOŁA is hereby appointed member of the Court of Auditors for the period from 1 February 2021 to 6 May 2022.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 19 January 2021.

For the Council

The President

A.P. ZACARIAS

---

(1)  Opinion of 15 December 2020 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

1

(2)  Council Decision (EU, Euratom) 2016/640 of 21 April 2016 appointing five members of the Court of Auditors (OJ L 108, 23.4.2016, p. 32.).

2

---
§ 3202.3 Applicability. ( a ) *Manufacturers, vendors, and designated representatives.* The requirements in this part apply to all manufacturers and vendors, and their designated representatives, who wish to participate in the USDA voluntary labeling program for biobased products. Manufacturers and vendors wishing to participate in the voluntary labeling program are required to obtain and maintain product certification.
( b ) *Other entities.* The requirements in this part apply to other entities who wish to use the certification mark in promoting the sales or the public awareness of certified biobased products.
**BRIEFINGON CIVILRIGHTS ISSUESFACINGMUSLIMS ANDARAB AMERICANSINNORTHDAKOTAPOST-SEPTEMBER 11**

**BEFORETHE NORTHDAKOTAADVISORYCOMMITTEE TOTHE U.S. COMMISSIONON CIVIL RIGHTS**

**MAY23, 2002**

Members of the North Dakota Advisory Committee

Executive Summary

Transcript
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

LARRY LEE MORRIS, JR.,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 4:20-cv-232-AW-MAF

WALT MCNEIL, SHERIFF,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

I have considered the magistrate judge’s June 24, 2020 Report and 

Recommendation. ECF No. 12. I have also considered de novo Plaintiff’s objections 

(ECF No. 15) and the supplemental documents he submitted (ECF No. 14). I have 

determined the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. It is now

ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 12) is adopted and 

incorporated into this order.

2. The clerk will enter a judgment that says, “The claims are dismissed 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for failure to state a claim.”

3. The clerk will close the file.

SO ORDERED on July 9, 2020. 

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00232-AW-MAF Document 16 Filed 07/09/20 Page 1 of 1