alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 222 (Thursday, November 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70711-70712]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29050]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

[OMB Control No. 3206-0218; Form RI 94-7]


Submission for OMB Review; Request for Comments on a Revised 
Information Collection

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. 
L. 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of 
Personnel Management (OPM) has submitted to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) a request for comments on a revised information 
collection. This information collection, ``Death Benefit Payment 
Rollover Election'' (OMB Control No. 3206-0218; Form RI 94-7), provides 
Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) surviving spouses and former 
spouses with the means to elect payment of FERS rollover-eligible 
benefits directly or to an Individual Retirement Arrangement.
    Approximately 3,444 RI 94-7 forms will be completed annually. The 
form takes approximately 60 minutes to complete. The annual burden is 
3,444 hours.
    For copies of this proposal, contact Cyrus S. Benson on (202) 606-
4808, FAX (202) 606-0910 or via E-mail to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#edae949f989ec3af88839e8283ad829d80c38a829b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="286b515a5d5b066a4d465b474668475845064f475e">[email protected]</span></a>. Please 
include a mailing address with your request.

DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received within 30 calendar 
days from the date of this publication.

ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to--

James K. Freiert (Acting), Deputy Associate Director, Retirement 
Operations, Retirement Services, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 
1900 E Street, NW., Room 3305, Washington, DC 20415-3500.
and
OPM Desk Officer, Office of Information & Regulatory Affairs, Office of 
Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, 725 17th Street, 
NW., Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503.


[[Page 70712]]


    For Information Regarding Administrative Coordination Contact: 
Cyrus S. Benson, Team Leader, Publications Team, RS/RM/Administrative 
Services, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW., Room 
4H28, Washington, DC 20415, (202) 606-4808.

John Berry,
Director, U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
[FR Doc. 2010-29050 Filed 11-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-38-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 28.431 Strict Middling Tinged Color.

Strict Middling Tinged Color is color which is better than Middling Tinged Color.
#### § 2500.001 Applicability of regulations.

The regulations in subparts A through E of this part apply to the programs authorized under section 14013 of the FCEA to be administered within the Office of Advocacy and Outreach (OAO). The purpose of this part is to set forth regulations for competitive and noncompetitive grants, cooperative agreements, and other assistance agreements awarded through OAO.
§ 3201.74 Thermal shipping containers. ( a ) *Definitions.* ( 1 ) Insulated containers designed for shipping temperature-sensitive materials.
( 2 ) Thermal shipping containers for which Federal preferred procurement applies are: ( i ) *Durable thermal shipping container.* These are thermal shipping containers that are designed to be reused over an extended period of time.
( ii ) *Non-durable thermal shipping containers.* These are thermal shipping containers that are designed to be used once.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The minimum biobased content for all thermal shipping container products shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product. The applicable minimum biobased contents for the Federal preferred procurement products are: ( 1 ) Durable thermal shipping containers—21 percent.
( 2 ) Non-durable thermal shipping containers—82 percent.
( c ) *Preference compliance date* — ( 1 ) *Durable thermal shipping containers.* Determination of the preference compliance date for durable thermal shipping containers is deferred until USDA identifies two or more manufacturers of biobased durable thermal shipping containers. At that time, USDA will publish a document in the Federal Register announcing that Federal agencies have one year from the date of publication to give procurement preference to biobased durable thermal shipping containers.
( 2 ) *Non-durable thermal shipping containers.* Determination of the preference compliance date for non-durable thermal shipping containers is deferred until USDA identifies two or more manufacturers of biobased non-durable thermal shipping containers. At that time, USDA will publish a document in the Federal Register announcing that Federal agencies have one year from the date of publication to give procurement preference to biobased non-durable thermal shipping containers.
[76 FR 43817, July 22, 2011]
#### § 29.3557 Type.

A division of a class of tobacco having certain common characteristics and closely related grades. Tobacco which has the same characteristics and corresponding qualities, colors, and lengths is classified as one type, regardless of any factors of historical or geographical nature which cannot be determined by an examination of the tobacco.

[30 FR 9207, July 23, 1965. Redesignated at 49 FR 16759, Apr. 20, 1984]
#### § 29.3047 Package.

A hogshead, tierce, case, bale, or other securely enclosed parcel or bundle.

[24 FR 8771, Oct. 29, 1959. Redesignated at 47 FR 51722, Nov. 17, 1982, and at 49 FR 16758, Apr. 20, 1984]
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.1

              SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                        THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

In connection  with the annual report of North  American  Nickel Inc.  (formerly
Widescope Resources Inc.) (the "Company") on Form 20-F/A Amendment No. 1 for the
period  ending  December  31,  2010 as filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Richard  J.  Mark,  Chief
Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  the  Report  containing  the  financial  statements  of the  Company  fully
     complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
     the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: October 28 2011

/s/ Richard J. Mark
-----------------------------------
Richard J. Mark
Chief Executive Officer

* A signed original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2303 

To define the term ‘‘covered waste’’ for purposes of the Department of 

Defense prohibition on the disposal of certain waste in open-air burn pits. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 6, 2013 

Ms. SHEA-PORTER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To define the term ‘‘covered waste’’ for purposes of the 

Department of Defense prohibition on the disposal of 

certain waste in open-air burn pits. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Save Our Soldiers’ 

5 Lungs Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF PROHIBITION ON DISPOSING OF 

7 WASTE IN OPEN-AIR BURN PITS. 

8 For the purposes of Department of Defense Instruc9 tion 4715.19, issued as required by section 317 of the Na10 tional Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2303 IH

1 (Public Law 111–84; 10 U.S.C. 2701 note) or any suc2 cessor instruction, the term ‘‘covered waste’’ specifically 

3 includes, in addition to the materials already specified in 

4 subparagraphs (A) and (B) of subsection (c)(2) of such 

5 section, the following: 

6 (1) Tires. 

7 (2) Treated wood. 

8 (3) Batteries. 

9 (4) Plastics, except insignificant amounts of 

10 plastic remaining after a good-faith effort to remove 

11 or recover plastic materials from the solid waste 

12 stream. 

13 (5) Munitions and explosives, the destruction of 

14 which is covered in Department of Defense Instruc15 tion 6055.09–M (Reference (i)). 

16 (6) Compressed gas cylinders, unless empty 

17 with valves removed. 

18 (7) Fuel containers, unless completely evacu19 ated of its contents. 

20 (8) Aerosol cans. 

21 (9) Polychlorinated biphenyls. 

22 (10) Petroleum, oils, and lubricants products 

23 (other than waste fuel for initial combustion). 

24 (11) Asbestos. 

25 (12) Mercury. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2303 IH

1 (13) Foam tent material. 

2 (14) Any item containing any of the materials 

3 referred to in a preceding paragraph. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Motion GRANTED and Order filed April 13 , 2022
.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 22

- 00246

- CV

____________ IN RE COMMUNITYBANK OF TEXAS, N.A. , Relator

O RIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS 270th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2021

- 25394



### ORDER
On April 5, 2022 , relator CommunityBank of Texas, N.A. , filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. Relator asks this court to order the Honorable Dedra Davis, Judge of the 270th District Court , in Harris County , Texas, to set aside her March 22, 2022 order granting real party in interest’s motion for new trial , entered in trial court number 2021

- 25394 , styled CommunityBank of Texas v. John Bradley Mitchell

.2 Relator has also filed a motion for temporary stay of proceedings below. See Tex. R. App. P

. 52.8(b), 52.10. On April 6, 2022, relator asks this court to stay proceedings in the trial court pending a decision on the petition for writ of mandamus. It appears from the facts stated in the petition and motion that relator’s request for relief require s further consideration and that relator will be prejudiced unless immediate temporary relief is granted. We therefore GRANT relator’s motion and issue the following order:
We ORDER all proceedings in trial court cause number 2021

- 25394 , CommunityBank of Texas v. John Bradley Mitchell , STAYED until a final decision by this court on relator’s petition for writ of mandamus, or until further order of this court. In addition, the court requests John Bradley Mitchell , the real party

- in

interest, to file a respo nse to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before May 4, 2022

. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.4.
PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Wise, Poissant, and Wilson.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

E-YAGE BOWENS,

DOC # M93599,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 4:20cv136-MW/MAF

WARDEN OF MADISON

CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,

Respondent.

___________________________/ 

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report 

and Recommendation. ECF No. 4. Upon consideration, no objections having been 

filed by the parties,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as this Court’s 

opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “The Petitioner’s petition, ECF No. 

1, is DISMISSED and the motion to waive the filing fee, ECF No. 2, is DENIED.”

The Clerk shall also close the file.

SO ORDERED on May 5, 2020.

s/Mark E. Walker 

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00136-MW-MAF Document 7 Filed 05/05/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 4:20-cv-00136-MW-MAF Document 7 Filed 05/05/20 Page 2 of 2
98-1805.

#### State v. Hawkins.

Franklin App. No. 97APA06-740. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
|  | **Bats and abandoned mine land reclamation** |
|--|----------------------------------------------|
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with thequarterly report on Form 10-Q of Advanced Life Sciences Holdings, Inc.(the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ending June 30, 2008 (the “Report”),I, Michael T. Flavin, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to the extent applicable; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|        |   | Date: August 14, 2008                 |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                       |
|   |   |                                       |
|   |   | /s/ Michael T. Flavin                      |
|   |   | Michael T. Flavin                          |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer                    |
|   |   | Advanced Life Sciences Holdings, Inc. |

 

----
Exhibit 10.24


Cypress Bioscience


2005 Bonus Plan


On February 8, 2005, the Compensation Committee
of the Board of Directors of the Company adopted a Bonus Plan for the officers
of the Company. The Bonus Plan was adopted to provide an outcome-based annual
cash incentive to the officers of the Company. Pursuant to the Bonus Plan, the
officers of the Company are eligible to receive cash bonuses up to between 25%
to 66 2/3% of base salary, depending on the applicable participant’s position
at the Company, for the year ended December 31, 2004 and the year ending December 31,
2005. The bonuses are contingent upon the Company’s achievement of certain
corporate goals related to clinical development of the Company’s current
product, milnacipran, new product opportunities and an increase in stockholder
value. The Compensation Committee established these corporate goals and the
timelines for their achievement at the February 8th meeting. Individual
awards will be pro rated for a partial year of service. Awards based on the
applicable participants’ base salaries for the year ended December 31,
2004, if any, will be paid upon achievement of the corporate goals established
by the Compensation Committee. Awards, if any, based on the applicable
participants’ base salaries for the year ending December 31, 2005 will be
paid upon the earlier of (1) achievement of all the corporate goals
established by the Compensation Committee or (2) January 31, 2006
with respect to the corporate goals established by the Compensation Committee
and achieved by that date. These awards are only payable if the participant
continues to be employed on the date of payment.
*

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-60208

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ONE BEIGE/WHITE 1996 FORD F250 PICKUP TRUCK, VIN

1FTHX26F6TEA73788; ET AL.,

 

Defendants,

CATHERINE Y. NEWELL, President of Cottage Gift and Garden,

Inc; C. D. NEWELL, JR., 

Claimants-Appellants.

THE COTTAGE GIFT AND GARDEN, INC.,

 Appellant.

 

---------------------------------------------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:99-CV-44-LN

-------------------------------------------------------

December 14, 2000

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges:

PER CURIAM:*

On February 28, 2000, the district court entered a final judgment of forfeiture with regard to

the defendant properties: one Beige/White 1996 Ford F250 Pickup Truck, VIN
2

1FTHX26F6TEA73788;oneKubota farm tractor, Model No. M858ODT, SN60148; and one Kubota

Farm Tractor, Model No. 3L4200DT, SN 50752. Summary judgment was entered because the

district court found that the defendant properties were involved in or traceable to a money laundering

offense in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956, thereby subjecting them to forfeiture pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

§ 981. The claimants, C.D. Newell, Jr., and Catherine Y. Newell, president of The Cottage Gift and

Garden, Inc., appeal the summary judgment on the basis that the Government failed to establish the

requisite probable cause.

 In a civil forfeiture case, the initial burden rests with the Government to demonstrate that

probable cause exists for the belief that a substantial connection exists between the property sought

to be forfeited and the illegal activity. United States v. 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme 2 Door,

Vin # 1G3WR14W5JD323281, 983 F.2d 670, 674 (5th Cir. 1993). The Government may prove the

requisite probable cause by both circumstantial and hearsay evidence. United States v.

$9,041,598.68, 163 F.3d 238, 246 (5th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 527 U.S. 1023 (1999). The proof

of probable cause issatisfied when there is “a reasonable ground for belief . . . supported by lessthan

prima facie proof but more than mere suspicion.” United States v. One 1986 NissanMaxima GL, 895

F.2d 1063, 1064 (5th Cir. 1990). If unrebutted, a showing of probable cause alone will support a

forfeiture. 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass, 983 F.2d at 675.

Our de novo review ofthe summary judgment evidence indicatesthat the Government carried

its burden of proving probable cause to support the forfeiture of the defendant properties. Because

the Government’s showing of probable cause was unrebutted by the claimants, the judgment of the

district court is AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, Stamatis V. Molaris, certify that:1) I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Quintana Maritime Limited. 2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions); a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.         By:                                                       /s/ Stamatis V. Molaris    Stamatis V. Molaris   Chief Executive Officer   Date: November 4, 2005
Exhibit
31.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, David
Lieberman, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of DATASCENSION INC.





2.Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. I am
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and have:





a)designed
such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this annual report is being prepared;





b)evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a
date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the
"Evaluation Date"); and





c)presented
in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation
Date;





5. I have
disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and
the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):





a)all
significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which
could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize,
and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and





b)any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and





6. I have
indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in
internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.





Dated:
      April 10, 2009/s/ David LiebermanDavid
      Lieberman
                Principal
      Accounting Officer