alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Data File Data Type Data Field Definition

Sulfates Fully neutralized ammonium sulfate

Nitrates Fully neutralized ammonium nitrate

Crustal Fine soil and representative metal 

oxide concentration 

OM Organic Mass

EC Elemental Carbon

Sulfates

Sulfate mass which includes sulfate 

and ammonum ion concentration plus 

particle bound water which is included 

in PM2.5 mass as measured by the 

FRM 

Nitrates

Nitrate mass which includes fully

neutralized ammonium nitrate mass 

plus particle bound water that is 

retained in measured PM2.5 mass as 

measured by the FRM

Crustal Fine soil and representative metal 

oxide concentration 

OM Organic Mass

EC Elemental Carbon

Sulfates Fully neutralized ammonium sulfate

Nitrates Fully neutralized ammonium nitrate

Crustal Fine soil concentration 

OM Organic Mass

EC

Sulfates

Sulfate mass which includes sulfate 

and ammonum ion concentration plus 

particle bound water which is included 

in PM2.5 mass as measured by the 

FRM 

SANDWICHed Nitrates

Nitrate mass which includes fully

neutralized ammonium nitrate mass 

plus particle bound water that is 

retained in measured PM2.5 mass as 

measured by the FRM

Crustal Fine soil concentration 

OM Organic Mass

CSN site

data

IMPROVE 

site data

Derived from 

measurements

SANDWICHed**

Derived from 

measurements
EC Elemental Carbon

* CSN sampling artifact for CSN is estimated as 0.4 ug/m3

**For all of the above SANDWICH values, includes a part of the SANDWICH 

passive component in proportion to the nominal SANDWICH estimates in order 
Derivation

Measured SO4 ion concentration x 1.375

Measured NO3 ion concentration x 1.29

Estimated using measured Si, Fe, Ca, Ti 

(modified formula without Al) = 3.73 × [Si] + 

1.63 × [Ca] + 2.42 × [Fe] + 1.94 × [Ti]

Measured OC adjusted for sampling 

artifact*, and the resulting value multiplied 

by 1.6 to represent OM in urban areas

Measured EC

Derived with SANDWICH

Derived with SANDWICH

same as Crustal above

Derived by material balance with FRM 

PM2.5 mass, using the other SANDWICH 

components

Derived from measured EC and nominal 

SANDWICH adjustments to achieve 

material balance with PM2.5 mass.

Measured SO4 x 1.375

Measured NO3 x 1.29

same as Crustal above

Measured OC adjusted for sampling 

artifact, and the resulting value multiplied 

by 1.8 to represent OM in rural areas

Measured EC

Derived with SANDWICH

Derived with SANDWICH

same as Crustal above

Derived by material balance with IMPROVE 

sampler PM2.5 mass, using the other 

SANDWICH components
Derived from measured EC and 

SANDWICH adjustments to achieve 

material balance with PM2.5 mass.

 CSN is estimated as 0.4 ug/m3

DWICH values, includes a part of the SANDWICH 

ortion to the nominal SANDWICH estimates in order
From: Robin Dunkins/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Cortney

_Higgins@omb.eop.gov Cc: Bill Schrock/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Kelley Spence/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, John Bradfield/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Scott Jordan/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Karen Thundiyil/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 12/14/2011 03:42 PM Subject: Fw: Review of Environmental Justice Impacts

________________________________________ Robin Dunkins Leader, Natural Resources Group Office of Air Quality

Planning and Standards US Environmental Protection Agency (C504 - 03) (phone) 919 - 541 - 5 335 (fax) 919 - 541 - 3470 dunkins.robin@epa.gov
**EXHIBIT32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc. (the “Company”)for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, James F. Cleary, Jr.and Mary Patricia B. Thompson, Chief Executive Officer and Chief FinancialOfficer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto our knowledge:

 
|        |   | (1) |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                    |
|--------|--------|-----|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | (2) |   | The information contained in the Report fairly  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of  operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in  the Report. |

 

 

February 4,2009

 

 
| /s  James  F. Cleary, Jr.  |     |
|--------------------------------------|----------|
| James F. Cleary, Jr.            |     |
| *Chief Executive Officer*            | * * |
|                                 |     |
|                                 |     |
| /s/  Mary  Patricia B. Thompson |     |
| Mary Patricia B. Thompson            |     |
| *Chief Financial Officer*            | * * |

 

----
#### § 35.15 Opportunity for hearing.

The person accused shall be entitled to a hearing, provided he makes written request therefor and files a written responsive answer to the charges made not later than 10 days after service of such notice upon him. The right to hearing shall be restricted to matters in issue. At such hearing, he shall have the right to be present in person or by counsel and to submit evidence and argument in his behalf. Failure to request a hearing within the specified time or failure to appear at the hearing when scheduled shall be deemed a waiver of the right to hearing. Such person may, in lieu of requesting an oral hearing, file a sworn written statement with the Secretary not later than 10 days after service of such notice upon him.
#### § 29.2300 Steam-dried.

The condition of unfermented tobacco as customarily prepared for storage by means of a redrying machine or other steam-conditioning equipment.

[37 FR 13521, July 11, 1972. Redesignated at 51 FR 40406, Nov. 7, 1986]
#### § 352.8 Marking requirements.

Prohibited and restricted products and articles subject to this part shall be adequately marked or otherwise identified by documentation to indicate their nature.
Case 4:20-cv-00148-RH-MAF Document 20-1 Filed 06/08/20 Page 1 of 13
Case 4:20-cv-00148-RH-MAF Document 20-1 Filed 06/08/20 Page 2 of 13
Case 4:20-cv-00148-RH-MAF Document 20-1 Filed 06/08/20 Page 3 of 13
Case 4:20-cv-00148-RH-MAF Document 20-1 Filed 06/08/20 Page 4 of 13
Case 4:20-cv-00148-RH-MAF Document 20-1 Filed 06/08/20 Page 5 of 13
Case 4:20-cv-00148-RH-MAF Document 20-1 Filed 06/08/20 Page 6 of 13
Case 4:20-cv-00148-RH-MAF Document 20-1 Filed 06/08/20 Page 7 of 13
Case 4:20-cv-00148-RH-MAF Document 20-1 Filed 06/08/20 Page 8 of 13
Case 4:20-cv-00148-RH-MAF Document 20-1 Filed 06/08/20 Page 9 of 13
Case 4:20-cv-00148-RH-MAF Document 20-1 Filed 06/08/20 Page 10 of 13
Case 4:20-cv-00148-RH-MAF Document 20-1 Filed 06/08/20 Page 11 of 13
Case 4:20-cv-00148-RH-MAF Document 20-1 Filed 06/08/20 Page 12 of 13
Case 4:20-cv-00148-RH-MAF Document 20-1 Filed 06/08/20 Page 13 of 13
TS- ASLT60

Attachment #7

Pt. 2, Sec. B, 1a

Processing Information on the New Chemical Substance s at Industrial Sites

Controlled by OthersAttachment #7

**Manufacturing and Processing Information on the New Chemical**

**Substances at Industrial Sites Controlled by Others**

**– Manufacture and Processing**  TS

- ASLT60
MEDIATION REFERRALS

2006-0559.

#### State ex rel. Basile v. Dublin Suites, Inc.

Franklin App. No. 05AP-464, 2006-Ohio-1029.

The following case has been referred to mediation pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(6):
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2214 

To extend the suspension of duty on reduced vat blue 43. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 30, 2006 

Mr. DEMINT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To extend the suspension of duty on reduced vat blue 43. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REDUCED VAT BLUE 43. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9902.03.04 of the Har5 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to 

6 reduced vat blue 43) is amended by striking ‘‘12/31/2006’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘12/31/2008’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

10 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ
2006-0027.

#### Karnofel v. Girard Police Dept.

Trumbull App. No. 2004-T-0145, 2005-Ohio-6154. Reported at 108 Ohio St.3d 1512, 2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 857. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
----

----

Fox Petroleum Inc. 10-Q

| (1)   | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2011, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                               |   |                                                                   |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date: October 19, 2011   | By:    | /s/ William Lieberman                                                  |   |
|                               |   | William Lieberman                                                      |   |
|                               |   | Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Fox Petroleum Inc. |   |
|                               |   |                                                                   |   |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

CORRY J. PRESTON,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 5:19cv378-TKW-MJF 

JAMES MARTIN, et al.,

Defendant.

/

OR D E R

This case is before the Court based upon the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 12). No objections were filed. Upon due consideration of 

the Report and Recommendation and the case file, the Court agrees that this case is 

due to be dismissed based on Plaintiff’s failure to comply with court orders and 

failure to prosecute. Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED that:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. This case is dismissed, and the Clerk shall close the file.

DONE and ORDERED this 4th day of September, 2020.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:19-cv-00378-TKW-MJF Document 13 Filed 09/04/20 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. Case Nos.: 3:94cr3136/RV/CJK

3:98cv59/RV/CJK

BENNIE CLEVELAND WILLIAMS

________________________________/

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated September 6, 2013 (doc.469). Defendant has been furnished a copy of the

Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to

Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely

filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed,

I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. Defendant’s “Motion to Re-open § 2255 with an Affirmative Order in light of Martinez

v. Ryan, which extended the Sixth Amendment Right to Effective Counsel” (doc. 462) is DENIED.

2. The Government’s “Motion to Dismiss Defendant’s Motion to Reopen Title 28 United

States Code, section 2255 Case” (doc. 466) is GRANTED.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 10th day of October, 2013.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 255 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 255

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To amend certain definitions contained in the Provo River Project 
Transfer Act for purposes of clarifying certain property descriptions, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFYING CERTAIN PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONS IN PROVO RIVER 
              PROJECT TRANSFER ACT.

    (a) Pleasant Grove Property.--Section 2(4)(A) of the Provo River 
Project Transfer Act (Public Law 108-382; 118 Stat. 2212) is amended by 
striking ``of enactment of this Act'' and inserting ``on which the 
parcel is conveyed under section 3(a)(2)''.
    (b) Provo Reservoir Canal.--Section 2(5) of the Provo River Project 
Transfer Act (Public Law 108-382; 118 Stat. 2212) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``canal, and any associated land, rights-
        of-way, and facilities'' and inserting ``water conveyance 
        facility historically known as the Provo Reservoir Canal and 
        all associated bridges, fixtures, structures, facilities, 
        lands, interests in land, and rights-of-way held,'';
            (2) by inserting ``and forebay'' after ``Diversion Dam'';
            (3) by inserting ``near the Jordan Narrows to the point 
        where water is discharged to the Welby-Jacob Canal and the Utah 
        Lake Distributing Canal'' after ``Penstock''; and
            (4) by striking ``of enactment of this Act'' and inserting 
        ``on which the Provo Reservoir Canal is conveyed under section 
        3(a)(1)''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 3, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 255

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To amend certain definitions contained in the Provo River Project 
Transfer Act for purposes of clarifying certain property descriptions, 
                        and for other purposes.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF EDISON CONTROL CORPORATION AS OF AND FOR
THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY 
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       2,304,996
<SECURITIES>                                 9,838,998
<RECEIVABLES>                                   55,398
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    230,318
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,477,449
<PP&E>                                         439,981
<DEPRECIATION>                                 374,294
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,553,486
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,177,574
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,360
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,354,552
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,553,486
<SALES>                                        791,502
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               791,502
<CGS>                                          660,857
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  660,857
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,498,023
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,415,441
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,082,582
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,082,582
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .98
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .94
        

</TABLE>
39–008 

108TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 108–753 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF MOTIONS TO 

SUSPEND THE RULES 

OCTOBER 7, (legislative day OCTOBER 6), 2004.—Referred to the House Calendar and 

ordered to be printed 

Mr. SESSIONS, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 829] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 829, by a non-record vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides that suspensions will be in order at any 

time on the legislative day of Thursday, October 7, 2004. The rule 

further provides that the Speaker or his designee will consult with 

the Minority Leader or her designee on any suspension considered 

under the rule. 

Æ
exv10w50



 






Exhibit 10.50




[LETTERHEAD OF STI]




July __, 2004




	 	 	 
	VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS

	 	PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
	 
	 	 
	«NAME»
	 	 
	«ADDRESS»
	 	 
	«CITYSTATEZIP»
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	Dear «SAL»:
	 	 






     This letter is to inform you that, subject to your agreement to the undertakings described
below, Superconductor Technologies Inc. (“STI”) intends, to the maximum extent permitted by the
Bylaws of STI (as restricted by applicable law), to advance your reasonable defense expenses
(including attorneys’ fees) incurred in connection with the following litigations (including any
related litigations which are subsequently filed) brought in the United States District Court for
the Central District of California (the “Actions”):




Backhaus v. Superconductor Technologies Inc.., et al., CV 04-2680

Goldfine v. Superconductor Technologies Inc.., et al., CV 04-2848

Alvarez v. Superconductor Technologies Inc.., et al., CV 04-2927




     This letter is also intended to confirm that you in good faith believe that you meet the
standard of conduct necessary for indemnification under Section 145 of the Delaware General
Corporation Law – that to the extent of your involvement in any matters that are the subject of any
of the Actions, you acted in good faith and in a manner you reasonably believed to be in or not
opposed to the best interests of STI. Section 145(e) and STI’s Bylaws require that, should it
ultimately be determined that you are not entitled to be indemnified by STI as authorized by those
provisions, any advance payments made by STI on your behalf in connection with any of the Actions
as to which such a determination is made must be repaid by you to STI.



     Accordingly, you undertake to repay all amounts paid or reimbursed by STI on your behalf in
connection with the Actions if it shall ultimately be determined that, with respect to the subject
matter of the Actions, you are not entitled to be indemnified. You further agree that, by
advancing defense expenses on your behalf, STI does not waive or limit any right to recoupment of
such expenses from any insurance policies which may be applicable. STI acknowledges that you are
not waiving any rights you may have to indemnification under applicable corporate, employment or
other laws.



     Please acknowledge your agreement with the foregoing by signing and returning the enclosed
copy of this letter.



 









 






	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Very truly yours,
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	SUPERCONDUCTOR TECHNOLOGIES, INC..,
	 	 	a Delaware corporation
	 
	 	 	 	 
	

	 	By:	 	 
	

	 	 	 	 
	Acknowledged and agreed:
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Date:	 	 
	[NAME]

	 	 	 	 









- 2 -
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:**Long-term patterns of vegetation and salinitychange in the Lake Pontchartrain Region, Louisiana [electronic resource]
 
SuDoc:I 19.76:00-0520
ItemNumber: 624-H (online)
CGPsystem Number: 000621912
#### § 201.30b Lot number or other lot identification of vegetable seed in containers of more than 1 pound.

The lot number or other lot identification of vegetable seed in containers of more than 1 pound shall be shown on the label and shall be the same as that used in the records pertaining to the same lot of seed.

[35 FR 6108, Apr. 15, 1970]
(Republished)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John C. Sands, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. No opinion. The order -of this court entered on April 2,1969 [32 A D 2d 613], is vacated. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Eager, Tüzer, Me'Givern and Markewich, JJ.
§ 318.13-16 Regulated articles from Guam. ( a ) ( 1 ) Regulated articles, other than soil, may be moved from Guam into or through any other State only if they meet the strictest plant quarantine requirements in accordance with part 319 of this chapter for similar articles offered for entry into such States from the countries of East and Southeast Asia, including Cambodia, India, Japan, Korea, Laos, the northeastern provinces of Manchuria, the Philippines, Taiwan, and Vietnam, or the islands of the Central and South Pacific, including Micronesia, Melanesia, and Polynesia, as well as Australia, New Zealand, and the Malay Archipelago, except requirements for permits, phytosanitary certificates, notices of arrival, and notices of consignment from port of arrival. Soil must meet the requirements of § 330.300 of this chapter.
( 2 ) Regulated articles that do not meet the requirements of paragraph (a)(1) of this section are prohibited movement from Guam into or through any other State.
( b ) ( 1 ) Regulated articles moved from Guam into or through any other State shall be subject to inspection at the port of first arrival in another part of the United States to determine whether they are free of plant pests and otherwise meet the requirements applicable to them under this subpart, and shall be subject to release, in accordance with § 330.105(a) of this chapter as if they were foreign arrivals. Such articles shall be released only if they meet all applicable requirements under this subpart.
( 2 ) A release shall be issued in writing unless the inspection involves small quantities of regulated articles, in which case a release may be issued orally by the inspector.
[74 FR 2775, Jan 16, 2009. Redeisgnated and amended at 83 FR 46638, Sept. 14, 2018]