alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                        5,291,387
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 1,804,572
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              0
<PP&E>                        96,076,204
<DEPRECIATION>                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                103,896,271
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         0
<BONDS>                       154,676,324
<COMMON>                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<OTHER-SE>                    (50,864,616)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  103,896,271
<SALES>                       12,072,916
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              12,230,697
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              4,032,142
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            13,761,446
<INCOME-PRETAX>               0
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           0
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (5,562,891)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 (.77)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (.77)


</TABLE>
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 4:02cr49-RH/WCS

4:04cv412-RH/WCS

JOHNNY WINBUSH, JR.,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER DENYING §2255 MOTION

This matter is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation (document 37) and the objections thereto (document 38). I have

reviewed de novo the issues raised by the objections.

The report and recommendation notes that a mental health evaluation

submitted by defendant appears on its face to have been altered. By copy of this

order, this circumstance is called to the attention of the United States Attorney for

such further consideration, if any, as he deems appropriate. 

Regardless of whether the evaluation was altered, it is clear that the instant

motion under 28 U.S.C. §2255 was not filed within the one year limitations period. 

Accordingly, 

Case 4:02-cr-00049-RH-GRJ Document 40 Filed 09/20/05 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 4:02cr49-RH/WCS and 4:04cv412-RH/WCS

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the opinion

of the court. Defendant’s motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. §2255 (document 29)

is DENIED as untimely. The clerk shall enter judgment and close the file.

SO ORDERED this 20th day of September, 2005.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:02-cr-00049-RH-GRJ Document 40 Filed 09/20/05 Page 2 of 2
#### § 29.1021 Form.

The stage or preparation of tobacco such as stemmed or unstemmed.

[42 FR 21092, Apr. 25, 1977. Redesignated at 51 FR 25027, July 10, 1986]
#### § 29.2413 Rule 22.

Tobacco shall be designated No Grade, using the grademark “No-G,” when it is classified as dirty, nested, offtype, semicured, premature primings, damaged 20 percent or more, extremely wet or watered or when it needs to be reworked, contains foreign matter, or has an odor foreign to type.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2503 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2503

To prohibit the obligation or expenditure of funds to provide military 
               assistance to opposition forces in Syria.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 25, 2013

   Mr. Yoho introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed 
Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 
   each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the 
                jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the obligation or expenditure of funds to provide military 
               assistance to opposition forces in Syria.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds the following:
            (1) The opposition forces in Syria include the Al-Nusra 
        Front, the Muslim Brotherhood of Syria, and other jihadist 
        organizations.
            (2) The Al-Nusra Front has pledged allegiance to al-Qaeda 
        and has been designated a terrorist organization by the United 
        States.
            (3) United States law prohibits the transfer of funds or 
        material assistance to known terrorist organizations.
            (4) The Obama Administration has not outlined a clear and 
        definitive plan for United States involvement in Syria.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON MILITARY ASSISTANCE TO OPPOSITION FORCES IN 
              SYRIA.

    No funds made available to the Department of Defense or any other 
United States Government department or agency may be obligated or 
expended to provide military assistance to opposition forces in Syria.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Metal
Management, Inc. (the "Corporation") for the period ended March 31, 2006 (the
"Report"), I, Daniel W. Dienst, the Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive
Officer and President of the Corporation, and I, Robert C. Larry, Executive Vice
President, Finance, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of the
Corporation, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) to my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.



  /s/ Daniel W. Dienst
--------------------------------------------
Daniel W. Dienst
Chairman of the Board, Chief
Executive Officer and President
July 31, 2006

  /s/ Robert C. Larry
--------------------------------------------
Robert C. Larry
Executive Vice President, Finance, Chief
Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
July 31, 2006

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Corporation and will be retained by the Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

KATHERINE GRIFFIN,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:19cv497–WS/MAF

ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner

of Social Security,

Defendant.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF

No. 27) docketed April 14, 2020. The magistrate judge recommends that Plaintiff’s

motion to remand (ECF No. 21) the case to the Commissioner be GRANTED.

Defendant has filed no objections to the report and recommendation.

The court having reviewed the matter, it is ORDERED:

1. The court ADOPTS and incorporates by reference into this order the

magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF No. 27).

2. Plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 21) to remand is GRANTED.

Case 4:19-cv-00497-WS-MAF Document 28 Filed 05/14/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

3. This case shall be REMANDED to the Commissioner for further

consideration consistent with the magistrate judge's report and recommendation.

4. This case shall remain open. The court retains jurisdiction over the action

for further proceedings should they be necessary.

5. The parties shall file status reports every 120 days to inform the court of

the status of proceedings below. If this matter is resolved by final decision or

agreement of the parties, the parties shall advise the court immediately.

DONE AND ORDERED this 14th day of May , 2020.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:19-cv-00497-WS-MAF Document 28 Filed 05/14/20 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2353 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2353

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 23, 2013

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend title 23, United States Code, with respect to the operation of 
    vehicles on certain Wisconsin highways, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OPERATION OF VEHICLES ON CERTAIN WISCONSIN HIGHWAYS.

    Section 127 of title 23, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(j) Operation of Vehicles on Certain Wisconsin Highways.--If any 
segment of the United States Route 41 corridor, as described in section 
1105(c)(57) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 
1991, is designated as a route on the Interstate System, a vehicle that 
could operate legally on that segment before the date of such 
designation may continue to operate on that segment, without regard to 
any requirement under subsection (a).''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 22, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
amtx_ex102.htm


Exhibit 10.2



 



	 DATE: 	 	MARCH 29, 2013
	 	 	 
	 FROM:	 	THIRD EYE CAPITAL CORPORATION
	 	 	 
	 TO:	 	MR. ERIC McAFEE, CHAIRMAN & CEO
	 	 	AEMETIS ADVANCED FUELS KEYES, INC.
	 	 	 





 




Reference is made to the Amended and Restated Note Purchase Agreement made as of July 6,


 


2012 (as amended, restated, supplemented, revised, or replaced from time to time, the “NPA”) by and among Aemetis Advanced Fuels Keyes, Inc. (“AEAFK”), Aemetis, Inc. (the “Parent”), and Third Eye Capital Corporation, as agent for certain Noteholders (“Agent”). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning given to them in the Agreement.


 


You have requested, and we have agreed to arrange, a special bridge advance of Revolving Notes in the amount of $2,000,000 (the “Special Bridge Advance”) on the following terms:


 



	
1.  

	
The Special Bridge Advance shall be mandatorily redeemed by the Borrowers, together with all accrued and unpaid interest thereon, upon the earlier of (a) the completion by any Company Party of an equity offering of Capital Stock that results in gross proceeds of at least $7,000,000 in the aggregate from the date hereof; and (b) August 22, 2013.







 



	
2.  

	
The Special Bridge Advance shall comprise a Non-Revolving Portion of the Revolving Notes, and may not be re-issued once redeemed. Only the TEC Insight Fund Purchaser will make the Special Bridge Advance.







 



	
3.  

	
The closing of the Special Bridge Advance shall be conditional upon, inter alia, the following: (a) there being no breach or default occurring under the NPA; (b) the Chairman shall have delivered additional collateral, in the form of pledges and security interests in his personal assets, satisfactory to the Agent in its sole discretion; (c) the Agent shall have received reaffirmation of all guaranties pursuant to the NPA; (d) the Agent shall have received payment of the fees and other share consideration contemplated hereby.







 









	
4.  

	
The Borrowers agree to pay the Agent $300,000 as a placement fee, which shall be deemed to be fully earned and non-refundable on the date hereof, and payable upon the closing of the Special Bridge Advance.







 



	
5.  

	
In consideration of providing the Special Bridge Advance, the Parent shall issue one million common shares of its Capital Stock in favor of the TEC Insight Fund Purchaser upon the closing of the Special Bridge Advance.







 



	
6.  

	
The closing of the Special Bridge Advance is subject to satisfactory documentation made among the parties.







 


DATED this 29th day of March, 2013.


 


THIRD EYE CAPITAL CORPORATION


 


By:           /s/ Arif N. Bhalwani


Name:           Arif N. Bhalwani


Title:           Managing Director


 


 


AGREED AND ACCEPTED this 15th day of April, 2013.


 


 


AEMETIS ADVANCED FUELS KEYES, INC.


 


By: /s/ Eric A. McAfee


Name:           Eric A. McAfee


Title:           Chief Executive Officer


 


 


AEMETIS, INC.


 


By: /s/ Eric A. McAfee


Name:           Eric A. McAfee


Title:           Chief Executive Officer


 


/s/ Eric McAfee


ERIC McAFEE
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, Richard R. Woolcott, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Volcom, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: August 12, 2005 /s/ Richard R. Woolcott   Richard R. Woolcott   President, Chief Executive Officerand Director(Principal Executive Officer)
Page 1 of 2

1

 Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519 (1972).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 4:02-CR-033-SPM

ALBERT GAY,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the magistrate judge's report

and recommendation (doc. 67) dated June 27, 2006. The parties have been

furnished a copy and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections. After

being granted two extensions of time, Defendant filed his objections (doc. 72) on

August 14, 2006.

Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), I have made

a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made. 

Even in light of the “Haines rule”1

 cited by Defendant, which prescribes a liberal

construction of pro se inmate filings, Defendant’s claims lack merit. The

Case 4:02-cr-00033-MW-CAS Document 73 Filed 08/17/06 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

magistrate judge carefully considered the factual history available to him in

making his decision, and even considering all facts in the light most favorable to

Defendant, the motion fails to state a claim for relief. Defendant has not shown

any error in the magistrate’s findings. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 67) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Defendant’s §2255 post-conviction motion (doc. 51) is hereby

denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this seventeenth day of August, 2006.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 4:02-cr-00033-MW-CAS Document 73 Filed 08/17/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Steven J. MalcolmSteven J. MalcolmChief Executive Officer of Williams Partners GP LLC,
general partner of Williams Partners L.P.
(Principal Executive Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 71421]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29470]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army


Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation Board of 
Visitors; Meeting

AGENCY: Department of the Army, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice sets forth the schedule and summary agenda for the 
autumn meeting of the Board of Visitors (BoV) for the Western 
Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation (WHINSEC). Notice of this 
meeting is required under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 
92-463). The Board's charter was renewed on March 18, 2010 in 
compliance with the requirements set forth in Title 10 U.S.C. 2166.
    Date: Friday, December 3, 2010.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 3 p.m.
    Location: 7161 Richardson Circle, Fort Benning, Georgia.
    Proposed Agenda: The WHINSEC BoV will be briefed on activities at 
the Institute since the last Board meeting on June 17, 2010, as well as 
receive other information appropriate to its interests.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: WHINSEC Board of Visitors Secretariat 
at (703) 692-7421 or (913) 526-0377.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Pursuant 
to the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 and 41 CFR 102-3.140(c), 
members of the public or interested groups may submit written 
statements to the advisory committee for consideration by the committee 
members. Written statements should be no longer than two type-written 
pages and sent via fax to (703) 614-8920 by 5 p.m. EST on Tuesday, 
November 30, 2010, for consideration at this meeting. In addition, 
public comments by individuals and organizations may be made from 9:30 
to 9:45 a.m. during the meeting. Public comments will be limited to 
three minutes each. Anyone desiring to make an oral statement must 
register by sending a fax to (703) 614-8920 with his/her name, phone 
number, e-mail address, and the full text of his/her comments (no 
longer than two typewritten pages) by 5 p.m. EST on Tuesday, November 
30, 2010. The first five requestors will be notified by 5 p.m. EST on 
Wednesday, December 1, 2010, of their time to address the Board during 
the public comment forum. All other comments will be retained for the 
record. Public seating is limited and will be available on a first-
come, first-served basis.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-29470 Filed 11-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-08-P