alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 3400
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3400 appear at 76 FR 4806, Jan. 27, 2011.

§ 3400.2 Definitions. As used in this part: ( a ) *Director* means the Director of the National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) and any other officer or employee of the Department of Agriculture to whom the authority involved may be delegated.
( b ) *Department* means the Department of Agriculture.
( c ) *Principal investigator* means a single individual designated by the grantee in the grant application and approved by the Director who is responsible for the scientific and technical direction of the project.
( d ) *Grantee* means the entity designated in the grant award document as the responsible legal entity to whom a grant is awarded under this part.
( e ) *Research project grant* means the award by the Director of funds to a grantee to assist in meeting the costs of conducting, for the benefit of the public, an identified project which is intended and designed to establish, discover, elucidate, or confirm information or the underlying mechanisms relating to a research program area identified in the annual solicitation of applications.
( f ) *Project* means the particular activity within the scope of one or more of the research program areas identified in the annual solicitation of applications, which is supported by a grant award under this part.
( g ) *Project period* means the total length of time that is approved by the Director for conducting the research project as outlined in an approved grant application.
( h ) *Budget period* means the interval of time (usually 12 months) into which the project period is divided for budgetary and reporting purposes.
( i ) *Awarding official* means the Director and any other officer or employee of the Department to whom the authority to issue or modify research project grant instruments has been delegated.
( j ) *Peer review group* means an assembled group of experts or consultants qualified by training and experience in particular scientific or technical fields to give expert advice, in accordance with the provisions of this part, on the scientific and technical merit of grant applications in those fields.
( k ) *Ad hoc reviewers* means experts or consultants qualified by training and experience in particular scientific or technical fields to render special expert advice, whose written evaluations of grant applications are designed to complement the expertise of the peer review group, in accordance with the provisions of this part, on the scientific or technical merit of grant applications in those fields.
( l ) *Research* means any systematic study directed toward new or fuller knowledge and understanding of the subject studied.
( m ) *Methodology* means the project approach to be followed and the resources needed to carry out the project.
[56 FR 58147, Nov. 15, 1991, as amended at 76 FR 4806, Jan. 27, 2011]
EXHIBIT 32 

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to 

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 

as Adopted Pursuant to 

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BlackRock Capital Investment Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), James E. Keenan, as Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael Pungello, as Interim Chief Financial Officer and Interim Treasurer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of operations of the Company. 

 

|                              |                                                       |
|------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                         |                                                  |
| /s/ James E. Keenan

   |
| Name:                        | James E. Keenan                                       |
| Title:                       | Interim Chief Executive Officer                       |
| Date:                        | August 1, 2018                                        |
|                         |
| /s/ Michael Pungello

  |
| Name:                        | Michael Pungello                                      |
| Title:                       | Interim Chief Financial Officer and Interim Treasurer |
| Date:                        | August 1, 2018                                        |
#### § 301.85-2a [Reserved]
DENY; and Opinion Filed September 26, 2013. 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 13
- 01319
- CV IN RE ALLISON HOLLIN GSWORTH , Relator On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 429
- 00556
- 2011



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Francis, and Lewis Opinion by Justice Lewis Relator contends the trial judge erred in entering a judgment after the court’s plena ry jurisdiction had expired. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein. The agreed judgment in question was signed by the trial court on December 19, 2012, prior to the attempted dismissal of the case on May 20 , 2013. A judgment is effective when signed, not when it is entered into the court’s minutes. See Truelove v. Truelove , 266 S.W.2d 491, 493 (Tex. Civ. App.

— Amarillo 1953, writ ref’d); see also Newsom v. Ballinger Ind. School Dist. , 215 S.W.2d 375, 378 (T ex. App.

— Austin 2006, no pet.), T EX
. R. C IV
. P. 306a. Therefore, based on the record before us, the December 19 judgment was effective and the trial court has jurisdiction over the post

- judgment discovery filed by real party in interest. W e conclude rela tor has not shown she is entitled to the relief requested. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.8(a); Walker v. Packer , 827 S.W.2d 833, 839

- 40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding).– 2

– Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and motion for emergency relief

.

131319F.P05 /David Lewis/ DAVID LEWIS JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32

In connection with the quarterly report of Holloman Energy Corporation, (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) Mark Stevenson, the Principal Executive Officer of the Company and Robert Wesolek, the Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of their knowledge:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the company.



|                   |     |                                            
|------------------ | --- | -------------------------------------------
|                   |     |                                            
|September 16, 2009 | By: | /s/  MARK STEVENSON                        
|                   |     | Mark Stevenson, Principal Executive Officer
|                   |     |                                            
|                   |     |                                            
|                   |     |                                            
|                   |     |                                            
|September 16, 2009 | By: | /s/  ROBERT WESOLEK                        
|                   |     | Robert Wesolek, Principal Financial Officer
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-07-14T20:14:42-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-11-00103-CR

Belinda Orona, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF CALDWELL COUNTY

NO. 39195, HONORABLE EDWARD L. JARRETT, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Belinda Orona perfected an appeal from a conviction for resisting arrest. The clerk’s

fee has not been paid and the clerk’s record has not been filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a).

Because there was a question as to whether Orona is presently indigent, the Court

abated the appeal for a hearing. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 26.04 (West Supp. 2010). 

Following the hearing, the trial court found that appellant is not indigent. The Court subsequently

notified both appellant and her attorney of record that the appeal would be dismissed if the clerk’s

fee was not paid by July 5, 2011. The fee has not been paid.
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

__________________________________________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Rose and Goodwin

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: July 29, 2011

Do Not Publish

2
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. 4:92cr4013-WS

EMERSON DAVIS,

Defendant.

 

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION

FOR REHEARING

Before the court is the defendant's "Motion for Recalculation of Sentencing

and Rehearing." Doc. 2075. In essence, the defendant seeks reconsideration of the

court's order (doc. 2074) denying his motion for reduction in sentence pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3582. The government has responded (doc. 2076) in opposition to the

motion, and the defendant has replied (doc. 2077).

The court finding no basis for rehearing, it is ORDERED:

The defendant's "Motion for Recalculation of Sentencing and Rehearing"

(doc. 2075) is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 17th day of December , 2013.
Page 2 of 2

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
EXHIBIT 32 

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to 

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 

as Adopted Pursuant to 

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BlackRock Capital Investment Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2020 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), James E. Keenan, as Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael Pungello, as Interim Chief Financial Officer and Interim Treasurer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of operations of the Company. 

 

|                              |                                                       |
|------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                         |                                                  |
| /s/ James E. Keenan

   |
| Name:                        | James E. Keenan                                       |
| Title:                       | Interim Chief Executive Officer                       |
| Date:                        | May 6, 2020                                           |
|                         |
| /s/ Michael Pungello

  |
| Name:                        | Michael Pungello                                      |
| Title:                       | Interim Chief Financial Officer and Interim Treasurer |
| Date:                        | May 6, 2020                                           |
Final Report

Testing of Three Steroids from the Drug Enforcement Administration for 

Anabolic and Androgenic Activity In Vitro and In Vivo

June 2009

Contributors

The following persons participated in the conduct of the study

Names of study personnel have been removed for privacy

-3-
SIGNATURE PAGE for

Testing of Three Steroids from the Drug Enforcement Administration of Anabolic and 

Androgenic Activity In Vitro and In Vivo

Conducted by

BIOQUAL, Inc.

9600 Medical Center Drive

Rockville, MD 20850-3336

Names and Signatures removed for privacy

-4-
Continuing Abatement Order filed November 3, 2022 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-22-00078-CV

____________

MINAZ HASSANALI AND WESTMONT HOSPITALITY GROUP, 

Appellants

V.

MAHENDRA KAPADIA AND WESTCHASE INTERESTS, LLC, Appellees

On Appeal from the 334th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2021-51498

CONTINUING ABATEMENT ORDER

On August 30, 2022, we abated this appeal for sixty days. On October 28,

2022, appellants filed an unopposed motion requesting that we continue the 

abatement of this appeal. That motion is GRANTED.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s 

active docket until December 30, 2022. The appeal will be reinstated on this

court’s active docket at that time, or when the parties file a motion to dismiss the 

appeal or other dispositive motion. The court will also consider an appropriate 

motion to reinstate the appeal filed by any party, or the court may reinstate the 

appeal on its own motion.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Zimmerer, Spain, and Hassan.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 10, 2015.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of

the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, February 10, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A15D0241. ADRIAN BURDETTE v. CHANDLER TELECOM, LLC et al. .

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this

order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

2014DV237
#### Kantak Homes, Inc., Respondent, v. State of New York, Appellant.

(Claim No. 41775.)

—Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: In affirming we have not overlooked the fact that the Trial Judge admitted into evidence upon the offer of the claimant an *“*Agreement of Adjustment ” and a “ Notification by Superintendent of Offer to Settle .Claim ”. These had been submitted by the State to claimant pursuant to section 30 of the Highway Law, as amended. This was error. *(Brummer*v. *State of New York,*25 A D 2d 245.) However, there is ample other evidence in the record to sustain the award, and it appears that the court did not necessarily rely upon such exhibits. *(Hopkins*v. *State of New York,*276 App. Div. 945; *Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.*v. *Ritter,*24 A D 2d 1034.) If it were otherwise a reversal would be required. (Appeal from judgment of Court of Claims in favor of claimant on a claim for permanent appropriation of realty.) Present — Williams, P. J., Goldman, Henry, Del Vecchio and Marsh, JJ.
p. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1796 Prepped by Keeia Richards



### Document

Number: 

# 68 ) VI-B-1 9 Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 10/31/20084:20:38PM

Sheet 68of 107P. 2 A-90-3 7 VI-B-1 9 Thi s documen t

ha s bee n move dt o IV-E-3 0 a t th e reques t

o f th e projec t officer . I t

wa s incorrectl y categoriz e originally .
FLN (Rev. 4/2004) Deficiency Order Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs

DINO GENTILE

Case No. 3:99cr10/LAC

 

ORDER

Your document, Memorandum in Support of Defendant Dino Gentile’s Emergency

Motion to Reduce Sentence Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(I) (Compassionate

Release) received on August 10, 2020, was referred to the undersigned with the following

deficiencies:

Any party represented in a suit by counsel of record shall not thereafter take

any step or be heard in the case in proper person, absent prior leave of

court; nor shall any party having previously elected to proceed in proper

person be permitted to obtain special or intermittent appearances of counsel.

The document does not have an original signature as required by N.D. Fla. 

 Loc. R. 5.1(E).

For these reasons, IT IS ORDERED that:

The submitted hard copy of the document shall be returned by the Clerk without

electronic filing. It may be resubmitted after the above noted deficiencies are corrected.

DONE and ORDERED this 3rd day of September, 2020.

 s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:99-cr-00010-LC-MD Document 167 Filed 09/03/20 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 1, 2007, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert J. Krakauer, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/ Robert J. Krakauer               
|Robert J. Krakauer                   
|President and Chief Financial Officer
|August 9, 2007                       

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

KEVIN C. SULLIVAN,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:19-cv-188-AW-GRJ

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP., et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND 

GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

I have reviewed the magistrate judge’s June 23 report and recommendation. 

ECF No. 17. I have also considered de novo the issues raised in plaintiff’s motions 

to add new information (ECF Nos. 18 and 19), which I will treat as objections to the 

report and recommendation. No other objections have been filed. I now adopt the 

report and recommendation and incorporate it into this order. The motion to dismiss 

(ECF No. 11) is GRANTED, and the first amended complaint (ECF No. 5) is

DISMISSED. Plaintiff has 20 days to file a second amended complaint. The 

magistrate judge will conduct appropriate further proceedings. 

SO ORDERED on July 31, 2020. 

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 1:19-cv-00188-AW-GRJ Document 20 Filed 07/31/20 Page 1 of 1
PHANTOM Flying Flowchart V1.0 (Simplified Version) 

This flowchart is aiming at help you to get familiar with the flying procedures of PHANTOM, please read the 

Manual carefully to get the operation details. Its corresponding Firmware Version is V3.0. 

Switch on the transmitter, and 

then power on the PHANTOM. 

8®08®08®0®®®® 

IOC On & 

I 

_ 3~after p~r ~ LED : Mode +GPS Satellite 

Number+6Yellow 

I d. -.-==,......-,~ . ..,....,.Recor 1ngl 1 LED : Blink is ok. 

Green Quickly 

L ~ Record the - J _,...--....:..---, 

forward 

direction. 

___ F_a_il_s_a~_e __ ,..1 

LED: Blink Yellow 

Quickly 000000000 

Senser Error Too Big LED:Red+ 

Green+ Yellow 

Compass Error Too Big-------.. 

1------~c LED:Red+Yellow )IIIIIIIIIIIIC:=IIII!IIIII[:::::J 

If Red LED appears in the last four 

'---------<IH green flashes, the autopilot system 

cannot work. 

LED : Mode +GPS Satellite 

Number+6Green 

Important: If PHANTOM is 

moved after power on and 

before the motors start-up, 

that is normal. 

GPS Satellite Number:2:6 If it is stationary on the 

ground. please try the liv1U 

Basic Calibration. 

888888888 

ln1portant: At any tnornent after pov;er 

on. :f t11e GPS Satellite nurnl)er is less 

!han 6 and last for at least 1 Os; even 

though you select the GPS /\TTl. Mode 

and LED blinks in tile GPS A TTl. Mode, 

the PHJ\NTOM will work in P..TTI. Mode. 

I Home Point 

Recording is ok ----~ 

First Level 

Protection Alert -c: IOC Ending 

Second Level 

888888888 Protection Alert 

&Height Descent 

FailSafe Important: When you switch to A TTL Mode, the 

main controller will disengage enhanced FailSafe 

mode, you can re-gain control of aircraft. 

GPS Satellite-:-----. 

Number2.6 Return to the HomeP~~ 000000000 

1 GPS Satellite Nurnber:2:6, in GPS A TTl. Mode, 

1 Distance between the Horne Point and 

-..!..'t:....:...P:..:.HA;.;;,.;.NTOM> 1Om. 

__ (Home Lock) 

] 

Green Part means normal procedures: 

---• means regular situation. 

~ means selectable or possible situation. 

Pink Text tells the details. 

Red Part means possible abnormal situation. 

Part is possible in normal or abnormal situation, 

require you to confirm by the Text for details. 

Blue Part is the condition of the normal situation. 

Purple Part is the condition of the abnormal situation.
2006-0687.

#### State v. Hawkins.

Hardin App. No. 6-05-13. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex

rel. ROBERT V. SMITH

v. CASE NO. 3:20cv3678-MCR-EMT

JAY A. ODOM; OKALOOSA COUNTY

BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge M. Casey Rodgers on March 1, 2021

Motion/Pleadings: PLAINTIFF’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION 

 OF TIME TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT 

 [to March 12, 2021] 

Filed by Plaintiff on February 26, 2021 Doc. # 31 

Response on Doc. # 

Stipulated Joint Pleading

 X Unopposed Consented

JESSICA J. LYUBLANOVITS

CLERK OF COURT

/s/ Kathy Rock

Deputy Clerk: Kathy Rock

On consideration, the motion is GRANTED, as requested.

DONE and ORDERED this 1st day of March 2021.

 M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-03678-MCR-EMT Document 32 Filed 03/01/21 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO. 4:00cr64-RH

DWAYNE SOLOMON, DOCKET NO. 4:05mj141-WCS

Defendant.

 / 

O R D E R

The Defendant appeared before the undersigned on a first appearance today

to answer to the charges of violating her supervised release. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Defendant shall appear before Judge

Hinkle on November 29, 2005, beginning at 9:00 A.M., for a revocation hearing.

Until that appearance, Defendant will remain subject to the conditions of supervised

release. 

DONE AND ORDERED on November 3, 2005.

 S/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 4:00-cr-00064-RH-WCS Document 68 Filed 11/03/05 Page 1 of 1