alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

WILLIAM BRANDON BARBER,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 5:19cv382-TKW-MJF 

FRANK SULLIVAN,

Defendant.

/

OR D E R

This case is before the Court based upon the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 12). No objections were filed. Having reviewed the Report 

and Recommendation and the case file, I agree with the magistrate judge’s 

determination that this is due to be dismissed because of Plaintiff’s failure to pay the 

filing fee and failure to comply with court orders. Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED that:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. This case is DISMISSED, and the Clerk shall close the file.

Case 5:19-cv-00382-TKW-MJF Document 13 Filed 09/25/20 Page 1 of 2
2

DONE and ORDERED this 25th day of September, 2020.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:19-cv-00382-TKW-MJF Document 13 Filed 09/25/20 Page 2 of 2
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2063 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the health care provided 

to veterans of World War II at facilities of the Department of Veterans 

Affairs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 21, 2013 

Mr. BILIRAKIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the 

health care provided to veterans of World War II at 

facilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROVISION OF HEALTH CARE TO VETERANS OF 

4 WORLD WAR II. 

5 Section 1705(a)(6) of title 38, United States Code, 

6 is amended by striking the period at the end and inserting 

7 the following: ‘‘and veterans not covered by paragraphs 

8 (1) through (5) who served during World War II.’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 1:82-cr-01005-MP-AK

MARK WELDON CANTRELL,

Defendant.

___________________________/

O R D E R 

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 29, Report and Recommendation of Magistrate

Judge Kornblum, recommending that Defendant’s motion to vacate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

2255, Doc. 28, be denied. The Magistrate Judge filed the Report and Recommendation on

Wednesday, March 23, 2005. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and

Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections. Pursuant to Title 28,

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), this Court must make a de novo review of those portions

to which an objection has been made. Neither party has filed an objection. Having considered

the Report and Recommendation and all objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that

the Report and Recommendation should be ADOPTED.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated

by reference in this order.

Case 1:82-cr-01005-MP-AK Document 30 Filed 05/04/05 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 1:82-cr-01005-MP-AK

2. Defendant’s motion to vacate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, Doc. 28, is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 4th day of May, 2005.

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:82-cr-01005-MP-AK Document 30 Filed 05/04/05 Page 2 of 2
#### § 29.132 Division investigations.

An inspector, sampler, or weigher, when authorized by the Division, may of his own initiative, or upon the request of an interested party, review for the purpose of verification or confirmation any tobacco which he has certificated, and any supervising official may review the work of any inspector, sampler, or weigher: *Provided,* That such review shall not be made if the ownership of the tobacco involved has changed since the date of certification, unless there is intimation or evidence of deterioration or of irregularities or fraud in connection with the certification or sampling. When such review discloses an error in the certification, the inspector, sampler, or weigher concerned, or supervising official shall immediately correct the error by making an appropriate change in the certificate or by canceling the certificate and issuing a new certificate in lieu thereof. Any correction made on a certificate shall be initialed by the issuing official or by the supervising official. When a new certificate is issued for a lot of tobacco, the old certificate and copies thereof shall become null and void and shall not thereafter be used to represent the tobacco described therein.
#### § 29.3609 Rule 8.

A lot of tobacco meets the specifications of a grade when it is not lower in any degree of any element of quality than the minimum specifications of such grade.
#### § 29.3529 Length.

The linear measurement of cured tobacco leaves from the butt of the midrib to the extreme tip. (See Standard Tobacco Sizes, § 29.3591.)

[51 FR 40408, Nov. 7, 1986]
**Exhibit32.1**

Certification ofPrincipal Executive OfficerPursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/Afor the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the “Report”) of Federal ServicesAcquisition Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Joel R. Jacks, Chairman and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Registrant.
| Date: December 5, 2006 |       | By:        |   | /s/ Joel R.  Jacks                        |
|------------------------|------------|------------|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|                   | ** ** | ** ** |   | **Joel R.  Jacks**                        |
|                   | ** ** | ** ** |   | **Chairman  and Chief Executive Officer** |
|                   | ** ** | ** ** |   | **(Principal  Executive Officer)**        |

 

----
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2255 

To amend the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Development Act to extend to 

the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical Park Commission. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 4, 2013 

Mr. VAN HOLLEN (for himself, Mr. WOLF, and Mr. DELANEY) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Development Act 

to extend to the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National 

Historical Park Commission. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CHESAPEAKE AND OHIO CANAL NATIONAL HIS4 TORICAL PARK COMMISSION. 

5 The Chesapeake and Ohio Canal National Historical 

6 Park Commission (referred to in this Act as the ‘‘Commis7 sion’’) is authorized in accordance with the provisions of 

8 section 6 of the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Development 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2255 IH

1 Act (16 U.S.C. 410y–4), except that the Commission shall 

2 terminate 10 years after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO. 4:03cr64-SPM

JOSEPH L. THOMAS, JR.,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

ORDER CONTINUING VIOLATION HEARING

For good cause shown, Defendant’s Motion to Continue (doc. 35) is

granted. The violation hearing is reset for 1:30 p.m. on July 17, 2006 pending

assignment and scheduling of a change of plea on the new offense (4:06mj71-

WCS). 

DONE AND ORDERED this 17th day of May, 2006.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 4:03-cr-00064-MW-CAS Document 36 Filed 05/17/06 Page 1 of 1
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 5, 2013

s0529 

# Order

Clerk June 5, 2013

146537

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146537

COA: 309926

Genesee CC: 11

- 028308

- FC

RENEE LEA GARCIA,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 21, 2012

o rder of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Case No.: 3:20cv3986-TKW-HTC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ISRAEL DIAZ and MICHELLE 

LITTLE, 

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No. 3:20cv3986-TKW-HTC

GOAT EXPRESS, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

/

ORDER

This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 60). No objections were filed. Upon due consideration of 

the Report and Recommendation and the case file, the Court agrees with the 

magistrate judge’s determination that the parties settled Plaintiff Diaz’s bodily injury 

claim. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 60) is 

adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. 

2. Defendants’ motion to enforce settlement agreement (Doc. 43) is 

GRANTED and Plaintiff Diaz is precluded from recovering on his bodily injury 

claims. 
Case No.: 3:20cv3986-TKW-HTC

DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of July, 2021. 

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. Case Nos. 3:97cr103/RV/CJK

 3:97cr92/RV/CJK

 3:97cr81/RV/EMT

3:14cv183/RV/CJK

CHRISTOPHER SUMMERS

_____________________________/

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated April 17, 2014 (doc. 124). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the Report

and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28,

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed

objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed,

I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.

2. Defendant’s motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence, as docketed in each of

the above-styled criminal cases, is summarily DENIED and DISMISSED.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 11th day of June, 2014.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:97-cr-00081-RV-CJK Document 136 Filed 06/11/14 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. Case No. 3:99cr98/RV

 

KEVIN LASHAWN GROOMS

__________________________________/

ORDER REDUCING SENTENCE

Currently pending is the Government’s motion for a reduction of the defendant's

sentence under Rule 35(b), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. (Doc.66/51 ) The

Government has certified defendant Grooms’ subsequent substantial assistance in the

investigation of prosecution of other individuals, so that a reduction of sentence under

Rule 35(b) is warranted.

Upon consideration, I find that the grounds set out in the Government's motion

do constitute substantial assistance within the meaning of Rule 35(b), and that the

Government's motion should be, and is hereby, GRANTED. Accordingly, defendant

Grooms’ sentence and judgment entered herein on April 18, 2000, is hereby amended

and his sentence of imprisonment is reduced from a term of Life to a term of two

hundred four months (204) months followed by five (5) years of supervised release.

In all other respects, the defendant's judgment of April 18, 2000 (doc. 42), remains

in full force and effect.

DONE AND ORDERED this 26th day of June, 2006.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

Senior U.S. District Judge

Case 3:99-cr-00098-RV Document 52 Filed 06/26/06 Page 1 of 1
#### § 29.3060 Stemmed.

A form of tobacco, including strips and strip scrap, from which the stems or midribs have been removed.

[24 FR 8771, Oct. 29, 1959. Redesignated at 47 FR 51722, Nov. 17, 1982, and at 49 FR 16758, Apr. 20, 1984]
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.13


                                                         INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM

[AGCO  AGCO Corporation
LOGO]  -------------------------------------------------------------------------


     TO:     Stephen Lupton

   FROM:     Martin Richenhagen

   DATE:     January 26, 2005

SUBJECT:     Employment Agreement

This memorandum will confirm the terms and understandings regarding your
continued employment in the United States as Senior Vice President, Corporate
Development and General Counsel.

Effective 1 February 2005, your foreign assignment status and associated
allowances will terminate and you will continue your employment with AGCO
Corporation with a permanent base at AGCO's Corporate Offices in Duluth,
Georgia, on the terms and conditions applicable to any other Duluth-based
Officer of AGCO Corporation, and as set out in your Employment Agreement of 1
September 1999.

Also, effective 1 February 2005, your annual base salary will be Three hundred
and fifty thousand Dollars ($350,000) and you will continue to participate in
the Company's Incentive Compensation Plan at a potential award rate of 50%.

On cessation of your employment, the Company will repatriate you and your
spouse to the UK. The Company will also reimburse your and/or pay for
reasonable relocation expenses. This includes packing, insuring and transporting
reasonable personal household effects and furniture to the UK, including any
necessary in-transit charges, storage and insurance, but excluding automobiles.

It is understood that if additional issues need to be addressed as a result of
this change in your status, they will be resolved with the good faith of both
parties.

/s/ Martin Richenhagen
Martin Richenhagen
President and CEO
NUMBER 13-12-00493-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

TIDEPORT DISTRIBUTING, INC., Appellant,

v.

RAMON CERDA, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS

PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE 

ESTATE OF BRITTANY CERDA, DECEASED, Appellee.

On appeal from the 148th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

ORDER ABATING APPEAL

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on appellant’s unopposed motion to abate the 

appeal pending settlement. Appellant requests that the Court abate this appeal pending 

finalization of settlement of the underlying cause. Appellant states that, once the 

settlement is complete, appellant will move to dismiss this appeal.
2

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and the 

unopposed motion to abate, is of the opinion that the unopposed motion to abate the 

appeal pending settlement should be granted. The motion to abate the appeal pending 

settlement is GRANTED and this appeal is ordered ABATED until further order of this 

Court. 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 

29th day of January, 2014.
EXHIBIT
      10.15E




**FIFTH
      AMENDMENT TO EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT**




**THIS
      AMENDMENT** (this
“Amendment”) is dated as of January 3, 2006, between Theragenics Corporation, a
      Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and Bruce W. Smith (the
“Employee”).




**INTRODUCTION**




The
      Company and the Employee entered into that certain executive employment
      agreement dated January 1, 1999, amendment to executive employment agreement
      dated June 29, 1999, second amendment to executive employment agreement dated
      June 15, 2001, third amendment to executive employment agreement dated September
      3, 2002 and fourth amendment to executive employment agreement dated May 28,
      2003 (herein collectively referred to as the “Executive Employment Agreement”).
      The parties hereto now desire to clarify that the severance provisions in
      Section 4(e) and Section 4(f) are mutually exclusive provisions, and desire
      to
      amend the Executive Employment Agreement to require a six-month delay in the
      severance payments, but only to the extent required to avoid the Employee having
      a tax problem under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.




**NOW,
      THEREFORE** ,
      the
      parties agree and acknowledge that Section 4(e) of the Executive Employment
      Agreement does not apply under circumstances in which Section 4(f) applies
      and
      agree that Section 4(e) and Section 4(f) are each amended by adding the
      following to the end thereof:




“Notwithstanding
      the foregoing, if the payment of severance hereunder would fail to meet the
      requirements of Section 409A(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code, no payment
      hereunder shall be made until six months after the Employee’s termination of
      employment, at which time the Employee shall be paid a lump sum equal to what
      would otherwise have been the first six months’ of such payments, and thereafter
      payment of the unpaid balance shall continue on what would otherwise have been
      the original payment schedule for such unpaid balance.”




Except
      as
      specifically amended hereby, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full
      force
      and effect as prior to this Amendment.




**IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF** ,
      the
      Company and the Employee have each executed and delivered this Amendment as
      of
      the date first shown above.




**THE
                COMPANY:**
              
              THERAGENICS
                CORPORATION
              
              
              By:
                /s/Francis
                J. Tarallo
              Title:Chief
                Financial Officer
            **THE
                EMPLOYEE:**
              
              Bruce
                W. Smith
              
              By:/s/
                Bruce W. Smith
              Title:Executive
                V/P
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2391 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 25, 2014 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 5323 Highway N in Cottleville, Missouri as 

the ‘‘Lance Corporal Phillip Vinnedge Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2391 RFS

1 SECTION 1. LANCE CORPORAL PHILLIP D. VINNEDGE POST 

2 OFFICE. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 5323 Highway N in Cottleville, 

5 Missouri, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Lance 

6 Corporal Phillip Vinnedge Post Office’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any references in a law, map, 

8 regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lance Corporal Phillip 

11 Vinnedge Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 24, 

2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2223 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 15, 2014 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 220 Elm Avenue in Munising, Michigan, as 

the ‘‘Elizabeth L. Kinnunen Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2223 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. ELIZABETH L. KINNUNEN POST OFFICE BUILD2 ING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 220 Elm Avenue in Munising, 

5 Michigan, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Eliza6 beth L. Kinnunen Post Office Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Elizabeth L. 

11 Kinnunen Post Office Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 14, 2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


tjames on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-01-1998
<CASH>                                         $19,541,662
<SECURITIES>                                     6,830,266
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,054,219
<ALLOWANCES>                                        53,773
<INVENTORY>                                        780,825
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,942,331
<PP&E>                                          53,258,463
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,031,902
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  88,272,576
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,967,224
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           294,056
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    88,272,576
<SALES>                                         37,858,252
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,958,252
<CGS>                                           10,869,520
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   17,317,733
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  56,480
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,902,542
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,880,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,022,542
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,022,542
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .46
        


</TABLE>