alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2306 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to treat infant formula 

as adulterated if its use-by-date has passed. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 10, 2013 

Ms. MENG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to 

treat infant formula as adulterated if its use-by-date 

has passed. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Infant Formula Pro5 tection Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXPIRED INFANT FORMULA. 

7 (a) ADULTERATION.—Section 412 of the Federal 

8 Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 350a) is 

9 amended— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2306 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the 

2 end; 

3 (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at 

4 the end and inserting ‘‘, or’’; and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(4) such infant formula’s use-by date, as spec7 ified in the formula’s labeling in accordance with 

8 section 107.20 of title 21, Code of Federal Regula9 tions (or any successor regulations) has passed.’’. 

10 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by sub11 section (a) applies beginning on the date that is 6 months 

12 after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
~D

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION IX \ 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105

~ PRO~

October 15, 2014

Dennehotso Chapter, Navajo Nation Reservation

P.O. Box 2301

Dennehotso, AZ 86535

ATTN: ADMIN OFFICE

Subject: Request to retain public documents at the Dennehotso Chapter for public

inspection

To Whom It May Concern:

The purpose of this letter is to request that the Dennehotso Chapter of the Navajo Nation Reservation

retain the enclosed documents at the Dennehotso Chapter House for at least sixty (60) days for public

inspection. These documents are the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency’s preliminary decision

for the proposed Clean Air Act Prevention of Significant Deterioration amendment permit for the

McElmo Creek Unit Oil Production Facility on the Navajo Nation Indian Reservation near the city of

Aneth, San Juan County, Utah. These documents are currently available for public comment.

Please contact me at (415) 947-4156 or kelly.shaheerah(~epa.gov if you have any questions.

Sinc”l, ~j

4/4

Shaheerah Ke y, Environmental Engineer

Permits Office

Air Division

Enclosures
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

November 23, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00688

- CR

Frank Deon PHILLIPS

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR9117

Honorable Pat Priest , Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR

WANT OF JURISDICTION.

It is so ORDERED on November 23, 2016

.

_____________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on th is 23rd day of November, 2016

.

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
Page 1 of 2

Consolidated Case No. 4:20cv236-RH-MJF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

KIRK NIELSEN et al.,

Plaintiffs,

CONSOLIDATED

v. CASE NO. 4:20cv236-RH-MJF

RON DESANTIS et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________/

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL

Prior judgments dismissed all claims of the original plaintiffs in these two 

consolidated cases. The prior judgment in Case No. 1:20cv67 was entered under 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). The prior judgment in Case No. 4:20cv236 

resolved all claims among all parties in that individual case and thus was entered 

under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58.

The prior judgments left pending only claims of the intervening plaintiffs In 

Case No. 1:20cv67. Based on a settlement agreement, the intervening plaintiffs

have moved to dismiss their claims with prejudice and without retention of 

jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement. This order directs the clerk to 

enter judgment accordingly. Because the judgment will resolve all remaining 

Case 4:20-cv-00236-RH-MJF Document 620 Filed 08/05/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 5:10cv150-RH/EMT

claims among all parties, it will be a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58 final 

judgment.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The motion for voluntary dismissal, ECF No. 619, is granted.

2. The clerk must enter judgment in Case No. 1:20cv67 stating, “This 

judgment is entered under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58 and resolves all 

remaining claims among all parties. It is adjudged that the claims of the 

intervening plaintiffs Deborah C. Grubb, Douglas E. Hall, Carl F. McCoy, James 

K. Kracht, Dolor Ginchereau, and the Florida Council of the Blind are dismissed 

with prejudice.”

3. The clerk must close both of the consolidated cases—Cases No. 

4:20cv236 and 1:20cv67.

SO ORDERED on August 5, 2020.

s/Robert L. Hinkle

United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00236-RH-MJF Document 620 Filed 08/05/20 Page 2 of 2
2006-0261.

#### State ex rel. Martin v. Konteh.

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.
98-1303.

#### State v. Ross.

Clark App. Nos. 96CA53 and 96CA54. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
98-1460.

#### Headley v. Ohio Govt. Risk Mgt. Plan.

Muskingum App. No. CT970022.

Resnick, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.
#### § 29.80 Announcing grades.

The grade of each lot of tobacco as certified by an official inspector on a designated market shall be clearly announced by the warehouseman or his representative at the time the lot is offered in the auction: *Provided,* That the Director may waive the requirement of announcing grades in the auction if he finds it impractical for the warehouseman to render this service.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2176 

To require express prior statutory authorization from Congress to carry 

out any activities under the United States–Afghanistan Strategic Partnership Agreement, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 23, 2013 

Mr. JONES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To require express prior statutory authorization from Congress to carry out any activities under the United States– 

Afghanistan Strategic Partnership Agreement, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXPRESS PRIOR STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION 

4 TO CARRY OUT ACTIVITIES UNDER THE 

5 UNITED STATES–AFGHANISTAN STRATEGIC 

6 PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT. 

7 The United States Government may not carry out 

8 any activities under the United States–Afghanistan StraVerDate Mar 15 2010 23:34 May 30, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2176.IH H2176

pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2176 IH

1 tegic Partnership Agreement, signed on May 2, 2012, and 

2 went into effect on July 4, 2012, or any successor agree3 ment, for any fiscal year that begins on or after the date 

4 of the enactment of this Act absent express prior statutory 

5 authorization from Congress to carry out such activities 

6 for such fiscal year. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# NORTHEASTHEUCOPTER S

FLIGH T S E R V I C E S LL C

U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Docke dManagemen t

Syste m 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S E Wes t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mW12-14 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 Jul y 8,201 0 T o Who mI t

Ma y Concern : c£ , M y nam e i s Timoth y Dun n an dI amth e Chie f Pilo t a t Northeas t

Helicopter s locate di n Ellingto n Ct . Northeas t Helicopter s operate s unde r 1 4 CF RPar t

13 5 an d91.14 7 with pilot s commo n t o both . W e ar e require dt o hav e aseparat e Dru g an dAlcoho l Testin g Progra mfo r eac h operation . I woul dlik e t o reques t

an exemptiimfromth e regulatio n dia t require s u s t o hav e tw o separat e Dru g an d Alcoho l Testin g Programs . Northeas t Helicopter s i s asmal l operation . I t operate s with 4 helicopters , 5 pilot s an d1 mechanic . Th e money , tim e an dpers(Mme l cos t o f maintainin g tw o separat e Dru g an dAlcoho l Testin g Program s woul db e burdensom e t o th e compan y du e t o it s siz e an dstafBng . Grantin g th e exemptio n woul dbenefi t th e publi c a s awhol e b y allowin g th e compan y t o kee p it s cost s lowe r havin g t o maintai n onl y on e Dru g an dAlcoho l Testin g Program . Grantin g th e exemptio n woul dno t hav e an y impac t

o n th e leve l o f

safety . Al l person s (

mth e progra mwill b e hel dt o th e standar do f th e Dru g an dAlcoho l Testin g Progra man dundo * th e supervisio n o f th e Chie f Pilot . I n summary , durin g thes e difficul t times , smal l operator s v^ o operat e unde r 1 4 CF R13 5 an d9 1 shoul dno t hav e t o b e burdene dwid i maintainin g tw o separat e Dru g an dAlcoho l Testin g Program s whe n on e progra mi s sufficien t

du e t o th e siz e o f

th e operation . Than k yo u fo r you r tim e an dconsideraticHi o n thi s reques t I loo k forwar dt o hearin g fromyou . Cordially , Timoth y Dun n Chie f Fligh t Instructo r Northeas t Helicopter s Hanga rTwo • Ellingto n Airpor t • P.O . Box49 7 • Ellington , C T 0602 9 •'C 3

— I C D

Phon e (860 ) 871-205 4 • Fa x(860 ) 875-286 1 • www.northeasthelicopters.co m
#### § 2500.055 Audit.

Awardees must comply with the audit requirements of 7 CFR part 3052. The audit requirements apply to the years in which Federal financial assistance funds are received and years in which work is accomplished using these funds.
118 STAT. 2242 PUBLIC LAW 108–390—OCT. 30, 2004

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4306:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 108–731 (Comm. on the Judiciary).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):

Oct. 6, considered and passed House.

Oct. 11, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 108–390

108th Congress

An Act

To amend section 274A of the Immigration and Nationality Act to improve the

process for verifying an individual’s eligibility for employment.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. IMPROVEMENTS TO EMPLOYMENT VERIFICATION SYSTEM.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 274A(b) of the Immigration and

Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1324a(b)) is amended—

(1) in paragraph (1)(A), by inserting before ‘‘A person or

entity has complied’’ the following: ‘‘Such attestation may be

manifested by either a hand-written or an electronic signature.’’;

(2) in paragraph (2), by adding at the end the following:

‘‘Such attestation may be manifested by either a hand-written

or an electronic signature.’’; and

(3) in paragraph (3), by inserting ‘‘a paper, microfiche,

microfilm, or electronic version of’’ after ‘‘must retain’’.

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by subsection

(a) shall take effect on the earlier of—

(1) the date on which final regulations implementing such

amendments take effect; or

(2) 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Approved October 30, 2004.

8 USC 1324a

note.

Oct. 30, 2004

[H.R. 4306]
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 10(h)(A)


              SCHEDULE OF CHANGE IN CONTROL EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS

In accordance with the Instructions to Item 601 of Regulation S-K, the
Registrant has omitted filing Change in Control Employment Agreements by and
between P.H. Glatfelter Company and the following employees as exhibits to this
Form 10-K because, except as noted, they are identical to the Form of Change in
Control Employment Agreement (the "Form Agreement") by and between P.H.
Glatfelter Company and certain employees, which is incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 of our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
June 30, 2003.

1. Dante C. Parrini, dated as of December 31, 2000.
2. John C. van Roden, Jr., dated as of April 7, 2003.
3. Werner Ruckenbrod, dated as of December 31, 2000.
4. John P. Jacunski, dated as of December 15, 2004.
#### The State ex rel. Watkins, Appellant, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellee.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Watkins v. Indus. Comm.*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 392.]

(No. 97-1871

Submitted August 19, 1998

Decided October 14, 1998.)

*Philip J. Fulton & Associates*and *William A. Thorman III,*for appellant.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Cheryl J., Nester,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. .

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

*393Douglas, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Alice Robie Resnick, J.,

dissenting. I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and enter judgment pursuant to *State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm*(1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666.

Douglas and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.
§ 1773.9 Disclosure of fraud, and noncompliance with provisions of law, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements. ( a ) In accordance with GAGAS, the auditor is responsible for planning and performing the audit to provide reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement due to error or fraud. The auditor must also plan the audit to provide reasonable assurance of detecting material misstatements resulting from violations of provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, or grant agreements that could have a direct and material effect on the financial statements.
( b ) If specific information comes to the auditor's attention that provides evidence concerning the existence of possible violations of provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, or grant agreements that could have a material indirect effect on the financial statements, the auditor should apply audit procedures specifically directed to ascertaining whether a violation of provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, or grant agreements has occurred.
( c ) Pursuant to the terms of its audit engagement letter with the auditee, the auditor must immediately report, in writing via email, all instances of fraud, illegal acts, and all indications or instances of noncompliance with laws, whether material or not, to: ( 1 ) The president of the auditee's governance board;
( 2 ) RUS; and
( 3 ) OIG, as follows: ( i ) For all audits performed in accordance with § 1773.3(d) (audits conducted in accordance with 2 CFR part 200), report to the USDA-OIG-Audit, National Single Audit Coordinator for USDA, 1400 Independence Ave. SW, Ste. 419, Washington, DC 20250, email: *OIG-USDAsingleaudit@oig.usda.gov ,* or online at: *http://usdaoig.oversight.gov .*
( ii ) For all other audits conducted in accordance with § 1773.3 report to the USDA Office of Inspector General online at: *https://usdaoig.overight.gov .* If you need to provide any documents concerning your complaint, please fax to (202) 690-2474 or mail to USDA, OIG Hotline, P.O. Box 23399, Washington, DC 20026-3399, or alternately by telephone (800) 424-9121. Please note on your documents that you submitted your complaint online or by telephone.
[88 FR 7564, Feb. 6, 2023]
#### § 318.13-15 Parcel post inspection.

Inspectors are authorized to inspect, with the cooperation of the U.S. Postal Service, parcel post packages placed in the mails in Hawaii, Puerto Rico, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, or the U.S. Virgin Islands to determine whether such packages contain products whose movement is not authorized under this subpart, to examine any such products that are found for insect infestation, and to notify the postmaster in writing of any violations of this subpart that are found as a result of an inspection.
§ 319.56-10 Importation of fruits and vegetables from Canada. ( a ) *General permit for fruits and vegetables grown in Canada.* Fruits and vegetables grown in Canada and offered for entry into the United States will be subject to the inspection, treatment, and other requirements of § 319.56-3(d), but may otherwise be imported into the United States without restriction under this subpart; provided, that: ( 1 ) Consignments of *Allium* spp. consisting of the whole plant or above ground parts must be accompanied by a phytosanitary certificate issued by the national plant protection organization of Canada with an additional declaration stating that the articles are free from *Acrolepipsis assectella* (Zeller).
( 2 ) Potatoes from Newfoundland and that portion of the Municipality of Central Saanich in the Province of British Columbia east of the West Saanich Road are prohibited importation into the United States in accordance with § 319.37-20.
( b ) [Reserved]
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0316) [72 FR 39501, July 18, 2007, as amended at 83 FR 11865, Mar. 19, 2018]
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ISAAC BROOKS,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:03cv326-WS

JAMES V. CROSBY, et al.,

Defendants.

 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 26)

docketed May 20, 2005. The magistrate judge recommends that the case be dismissed

for failure to prosecute. 

Upon review of the record, this court has determined that the magistrate judge’s

report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order of the court.

2. This case is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute.

Case 4:03-cv-00326-WS-WCS Document 29 Filed 06/21/05 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 4:03cv326-WS

3. The clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

DONE AND ORDERED this June 21, 2005.

 /s William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:03-cv-00326-WS-WCS Document 29 Filed 06/21/05 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM * FORM 10-K 
FOR PERIOD ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE 
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. 

*IDENTIFY THE FINANCIAL STATEMENT(S) TO BE REFERENCED IN THE LEGEND: THIS IS FOR
A 6 MONTH TRANSITION PERIOD.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAY-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                               2,552
<SECURITIES>                                         4,101
<RECEIVABLES>                                       48,178
<ALLOWANCES>                                         1,740
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    75,470
<PP&E>                                               7,776
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     100,393
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               18,515
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 8
<OTHER-SE>                                          81,870
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       100,393
<SALES>                                             89,063
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    89,063
<CGS>                                               69,951
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    20,382
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        215
<INCOME-TAX>                                           124
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     91                  
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                            91
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         8141
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
Order entered May 13, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01313-CV

INSURANCE ALLIANCE, Appellant/Cross-Appellee

V.

LAKE TEXOMA HIGHPORT, LLC, ET AL., Appellees/Cross-Appellants

On Appeal from the 397th Judicial District Court

Grayson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 08-0604-397

ORDER

The Court has before it appellee and cross-appellant Lake Texoma Highport, LLC’s May 

9, 2013 unopposed motion for extension of time to file its brief. The Court GRANTS the 

motion and ORDERS Lake Texoma Highport, LLC to file its brief by June 19, 2013.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
#### § 29.9402 Policy statement.

The sets of inspectors available to serve the flue-cured marketing areas are currently adequate to provide inspection service as rapidly as tobacco can be purchased, handled and processed by the currently existing facilities of the buyers, and the lack of inspection personnel is not a limiting factor to accelerated marketings or the extension of price support to producers. The sets of buyers assigned to the flue-cured markets by the buying industry are adequate to purchase tobacco as rapidly as it can be handled and processed by the buyers' facilities. However, the tobacco ready for marketing during most weeks of the marketing season substantially exceeds the quantities which can be purchased, handled and processed by the currently existing facilities of the buyers. Moreover, the total number of flue-cured markets are substantially greater than the number of sets of buyers assigned by the buying companies or the number of sets of available inspectors. In this situation, about 6 months is required to market a year's crop of flue-cured tobacco and all warehouses cannot be served at the same time by the available sets of inspectors and the sets of buyers assigned by the buying companies. As additional sets of inspectors would not relieve the situation, inspection service will be provided by assigning the available inspectors to the various marketing areas and to warehouses within the marketing areas in a manner determined by the Secretary to provide the best and most equitable service to all growers.