T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d byN i nth C i r c ui tR ul e 36- 3.

T he H on orabl e D on al d W . M ol l oy, U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctJudg e, ** D i s tr i c tof

M ont a na , s i tt i ng byde s i gna t i on.

NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T RU D Y H A RRI S, P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. F R AN K P . AL VA R AD O, D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 08- 16860 D . C. N o . 1 : 0 3 - c v - 5 6 9 0 - O W W - D LB P ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia O l i ve rW . W a gne r , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d O c t obe r5, 2010 S a n F r a n c is c o , C a lif

o rn ia B e f o r e : KL E I NF E L D an dGR AB E R , C i r c u i tJu d g e s , a n dMOL L OY , ** D i stri ctJudg e. P l ai nt i ff R ud y H arri s app ea l s f

rom the di stri ctcourt ’ s grantof sum m ary j udgm e ntf

orD e f e nda ntF r a nk A l va r a do, the onl yr e m a i ni ng de f e nda nti n thi s 42 U . S . C . § 1983 c a s e . W e r e vi e w de novo, S e rr a no v. F r a nc i s , 345 F . 3d 1071, 1082 

# FI LED OC T 28 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

( 9 th C i r . 2 0 0 3 ) , a n da f

f i rm f o rad i f f e r e n tr e a s o n , s e e i d . a t1 0 7 6 - 7 7 ( n o t i n g th a twe m ayaf fi rm on any groun d sup po rt ed by the re cord). E v e n if w e a s s u m e th a t P la in tif f c a n e s tab lis h th a t D e f

e n d a n t f ir e dh im to a c c o m p lis h " e th n ic b a lan c in g " a n dth a t d o in g s o w a s u n c o n s titu tio n a l, D e f e n d a n t is s t i l l e nt i t l e d t o qua l i f

i e d i m m uni ty . C a l i f

orni aC ode of

R e gul a t i ons t i t l e 15, s e c t i on 3 0 4 1 .1 ( a ) , in s tru c ts in m a te w o rks up e rv is o r s to ta k e in to a c c o u n t " e th n ic b a lan c e ," in a d d itio n to s e v e r a l o th e rc r ite r ia , w h e n a s s ig n in g in m a te s to p a idp o s itio n s . T hus , D e f

e nda ntw a s f

ol l ow i ng a n of

f i c i a l r e gul a t i on dul ypr om ul ga t e d by C a lif o rn ia ’s C o rr e c tio n s S tan d a r d s A u th o r ity . A tthe t i m e of

P l a i nt i f f’ s t e rm i na t i on, w e r e vi e w e d r a c e - ba s e d pr i s on re gu l at i on s onl y t o see thatthey w er e " re as on abl y r el at ed t o l egi t i m at e penol og i ca l i nt er es t s, " A rm strong v. D avi s, 27 5 F . 3d 84 9, 87 3 (9th C i r. 20 01 ) ( i nt ernal qu ot at i on m arks om i tt ed), rather than u si ng stri ctsc rut i ny as the S up re m e C ou rt l a t e ri ns truc t e d i n J ohns on v. C a l i f orni a , 543 U . S . 499, 504- 05 ( 2005) . T o da t e , no courthas quest i on ed the l egal i ty of C al i forni a’ s i nm at e hi ri ng re gu l at i on or another lik e it. I n th e s e c ir c u m s tan c e s , a n yr ig h t th a t P la in tif f h a dw a s n o t " c le a r ly e s tab lis h e d ," P e a r s o n v . C a llah a n , 1 2 9 S . C t. 8 0 8 , 8 1 5 ( 2 0 0 9 ) , s o D e f e n d a n t is e nt i t l e d t o qua l i f

i e d i m m uni ty . C f

. G r os s m a n v. C i tyof

P ort l a nd, 33 F . 3d 1200, 1 2 0 9 - 1 0 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 4 ) ( h o ld in g th a t adu lye n a c te dc ityo r d in a n c e th a t e x p lic itly3

s a n c tio n s th e c o n du c t in q u e s tio n ab s o lv e s a n o f f ic e rf r o m k n o w in g th a t h is c onduc tw a s unl a w f

ul , e xc e ptw he n the or di na nc e s o pa t e nt l yvi ol a t e s the C o n s titu tio n th a t ar e a s o n ab le o f f ic e rc o u ldn o t b e lie v e th a t it w a s p e rm is s ib le to enforce i t ). AF F I R ME D.