alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

Advisory 

Circular

Subject: Change 6 to MEASUREMENT, 

CONSTRUCTION, AND MAINTENANCE OF SKIDRESISTANT AIRPORT PAVEMENT SURFACES 

Date: 05/25/2005

Initiated by: AAS-100 

AC No: 150/5320-12C

Change: 6 

1. PURPOSE. This change updates information regarding FAA qualified Continuous Friction 

Measuring Equipment. 

2. PRINCIPAL CHANGES. The following editorial changes have been made: 

 a. Appendix 4. Changes have been made to reflect updated information for manufacturers. 

PAGE CONTROL CHART

Remove Pages Dated Insert Pages Dated 

Appendix 4 

pg. 1 (and 2)

04/15/05 Appendix 4 

pg. 1 (and 2) 

05/25/05 

DAVID L. BENNETT 

Director of Airport Safety 

 and Standards 

05/25/05 AC 150/5320-12C 

Appendix 4 

Change 6 

1 (and 2)

APPENDIX 4. FAA-APPROVED CFME 

AIRPORT SURFACE FRICTION TESTER INDUSTRIES AB AIRPORT SURFACE FRICTION TESTER 

Metallgatan 7 +46 0 411 651 00 

271 39 Ystad, Sweden FAX +46 0 411 190 12 

SWEDEN sales@ asft.se 

AIRPORT TECHNOLOGY USA SAFEGATE FRICTION TESTER 

NO LONGER AVAILABLE 

DYNATEST CONSULTING, INC., RUNWAY FRICTION TESTER (6810, 6850 and 6875) 

(FORMERLY K.J. LAW ENGINEERS, INC.) (904) 964-3777

13952 US Highway 301 South FAX (904) 964-3749 

Starke, FL 32091 

FINDLAY, IRVINE, LTD. GRIPTESTER FRICTION TESTER

42-44 Bog Road, Penicuik +44 1968 672111 

Midlothian EH 26 9 BU FAX +44 1968 671237 

SCOTLAND www.findlayirvine.com 

INTERTECH ENGINEERING TATRA FRICTION TESTER

 NO LONGER AVAILABLE 

DOUGLAS EQUIPMENT LTD MU METER 

Douglas House, Village Road +44 1242 531219 

Arle, Cheltenham FAX +44 1242 571667 

Gloucestershire email: spd@douglas-equipment.com

GL51 0AB UK 

NORSEMETER RUNAR RUNWAY ANALYSER AND RECORDER 

P. O. Box 125 +47 23 20 1270 

Bogstadvien FAX + 47 23 20 1271 

0323 0310 

NORWAY 

PATRIA VAMMAS AEC BV-11 SKIDDOMETER 

P.O. Box 18 Vammaksentie + 358 20 4694041 

FIN-38201 Vammala FAX +358 20 4694250 

FINLAND www.patria.fi 

SCANDINAVIAN AIRPORT AND ROAD SYSTEMS AB SARSYS FRICTION TESTER (SFT) 

Box 31, Sjoviksvagen 4 SARSYS TRAILER FRICTION TESTER (STFT) 

23121 Trelleborg +46 410 46 110 

SWEDEN FAX +46 410 46 111 

US/Canada Tradewind Scientific Ltd. www.tradewindscientific.com
§ 3201.93 Leather, vinyl, and rubber care products. ( a ) *Definition.* Products that help clean, nourish, protect, and restore leather, vinyl, and rubber surfaces, including cleaners, conditioners, protectants, polishes, waxes, etc.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The Federal preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 55 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than November 19, 2013, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased leather, vinyl, and rubber care products. By that date, Federal agencies that have the responsibility for drafting or reviewing specifications for products to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased leather, vinyl, and rubber care products.
[77 FR 69386, Nov. 19, 2012]
#### § 29.3070 Tobacco products.

Manufactured tobacco, including cigarettes, cigars, smoking tobacco, chewing tobacco, and snuff, which is subject to Internal Revenue tax.

[24 FR 8771, Oct. 29, 1959. Redesignated at 47 FR 51722, Nov. 17, 1982, 49 FR 16758, Apr. 20, 1984, and 51 FR 40407, Nov. 7, 1986]
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.1

              SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                        THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

In connection  with the annual report of North  American  Nickel Inc.  (formerly
Widescope  Resources  Inc.) (the  "Company")  on Form 20-F for the period ending
December 31, 2011 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Richard J. Mark, Chief Executive  Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  the  Report  containing  the  financial  statements  of the  Company  fully
     complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
     the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 27, 2012

/s/ Richard J. Mark
-----------------------------------
Richard J. Mark
Chief Executive Officer

* A signed original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

----
2006-0585.

#### State ex rel. Cotton v. Carr.

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000793935
<NAME> NASHVILLE LAND FUND, LTD
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          47,881
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       3,004,747
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,088,632
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,838
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,054,794
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,088,632
<SALES>                                      1,585,746
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               473,706
<CGS>                                          965,501
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,119,325
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               110,562
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                363,144
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            363,144
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   363,144
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    48.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    48.42
        

</TABLE>
#### § 22.301 Selection and designation.

Procedures for implementing the Act are designed to give the fullest possible consideration to planning and development goals and strategies at the State and multicounty jurisdictional levels. The governing bodies of multicounty organizations should include representatives of local governments contained within the respective multicounty jurisdictions. State development strategies and priorities shall be fully considered in the Federal administration of Rural Development Act authorities.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCTS 

LIABILITY LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

Dylan Rogers v. 3M Company et al.

Case No. 3:22-cv-07204-MCR-GRJ

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 3:19-MD-2885

STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the undersigned Parties 

pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) that the claims of Plaintiff Dylan 

Rogers in the above captioned case be dismissed without prejudice against all Defendants based 

on Plaintiff’s dual-representation by multiple Plaintiff firms. Each party to bear its own costs. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

Dated: February 7, 2023 By: /s/ Michele M. Vercoski

Michele M. Vercoski, Esq. 

Tuan Q. Nguyen, Esq.

MCCUNE LAW GROUP, APC

18565 Jamboree Road, Suite 550

Irvine, California 92612

Telephone: (909) 557-1250

Facsimile: (909) 557-1275

mmv@mccunewright.com

tqn@mccunewright.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff Dylan Rogers

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3658 Filed 02/07/23 Page 1 of 3
2

Dated: February 7, 2023 /s/ Larry Hill

Larry Hill

Florida Bar No. 173908

lhill@mhw-law.com

ljohnson@mhw-law.com

Charles F. Beall, Jr.

Florida Bar No. 66494

cbeall@mhw-law.com

Haley J. VanFleteren

Florida Bar No. 1003674

hvanfleteren@mhw-law.com

MOORE, HILL & WESTMORELAND, P.A.

350 West Cedar Street

Maritime Place, Suite 100

Pensacola FL 32502

Telephone: (850) 434-3541

Attorneys for Defendants 3M Company, Aearo 

Technologies LLC, Aearo Holdings, LLC, 

Aearo Intermediate, LLC, and Aearo, LLC

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3658 Filed 02/07/23 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Michele M. Vercoski, hereby certify that on February 7, 2023 the foregoing 

document, filed through the CM/ECF System, will be sent electronically to the registered 

participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) and paper copies will 

be sent to those indicated as non-registered participants.

Dated: February 7, 2023

/s/ Michele M. Vercoski

Michele M. Vercoski

3

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3658 Filed 02/07/23 Page 3 of 3
98-1280.

#### State v. Ward.

Hamilton App. Nos. C-910878 and C-910881. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
#### The State ex rel. Allen, Appellee, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellants.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Allen v. Indus. Comm.*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 97.]

(No. 96-420

Submitted June 9, 1998

Decided September 9, 1998.)

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Steven P. Fixler,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellants.

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of *State ex rel. Tapp v. Parsec, Inc.*(1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 417, 696 N.E.2d 591, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Case 4:20-cv-00054-RH-CAS Document 1 Filed 01/31/20 Page 1 of 4
Case 4:20-cv-00054-RH-CAS Document 1 Filed 01/31/20 Page 2 of 4
Case 4:20-cv-00054-RH-CAS Document 1 Filed 01/31/20 Page 3 of 4
Case 4:20-cv-00054-RH-CAS Document 1 Filed 01/31/20 Page 4 of 4
#### § 3.87 Agency regulations.

USDA agencies may issue regulations or policies not inconsistent with OPM regulations (5 CFR part 550, subpart K) and regulations in this subpart governing the collection of a debt by salary offset.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Magda Kroo, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Staley, Jr., J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which disqualified claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits on the ground that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. Claimant was employed by the respondent for approximately three and one-half years and, in April, 1965, she requested her annual two-week vacation for the following July. Her supervisor denied the request because claimant’s seniority was not sufficient to entitle her to the July vacation. Claimant alleges that she was told that if she did not take the vacation allotted to her, she was fired. On May 26, 1965, claimant’s father died and she was granted a leave of absence until June 7, at which time she requested permission to take her vacation, which she took until June 20. She failed to return to work on June 21, 1965. Claimant alleged that she failed to return to work because she thought she was fired. The employer had no knowledge of the termination of her employment, expected her to return to work on June 21 and a position was available for her if she returned. There is substantial evidence in the record to establish that claimant was not discharged, but voluntarily separated herself from her employment, and that such separation was without good cause. What constitutes “good cause” is a factual question and thus within the exclusive province of the board, if its determination is supported by substan*783tial evidence. (Labor Law, §§ 593, 623; *Matter of Rink*[Catherwood], 25 A D 2d 790.) Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur in a memorandum decision by Staley, Jr., J.
### SERVE D JUL Y18 , 201 1 

### OERARTMENTO F U.S . DEPARTNIENT OFTRANSPORTATIO N ..]?; • ;NSP0RTATI0 N • OFFIC E OFHEARING S ' '-^ ^ '- ^ ' OrtriATlON S WASHINGTON , D C ^Oi i JU L !8 . P 2

- 3 0 I N TH EMATTE RO F K. S . AVIATION , INC . d/b/aSIERRA ACADEM Y O FAERONAUTIC S FA A DOCKE T NO . [T O B E ASSIGNED ]

(Civi l Penalty Action ) FDM S NO . FAA-20 1 1 -048 3 NOTIC EO FASSIGNMEN T O FPROCEEDIN G Thi s proceedin g (heretofor e designate da s Cas e No . 201IWP170009 ) ha s been assigne dt o Administrativ e La w Judg e RichardC . Goodwin . Al l future pleading s and othe r communication s regardin g thi s proceedin g shal l b e serve don th e Judge , th e FA A •Hearing Docket , andth e othe r person s o

n the attache dServic e List .

Ronni e A . Voder Chie f Administrativ e Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis t•'•}lfl '

FDM S No . FAA-2011-048 3 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON E COP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 ' ON ECOP Y C>Ti l L . Lawrence , Respondent' s Counse l Cyri l Lawrence , Inc . 211 1 K Stree t Merced , C A 9534 0 TEL : 209-383-685 4 FAX : 209-383-685 6 Lierr e Green , Complainant' s Counse l Attorney . Offic e o f

th e Regiona l Counse l Western-Pacifi c Region , AWP-7. 6 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n P.O . Bo x 9200 7 Lo s Angeles , C A 90009-200 7 TEL : 310-725-711 7 FAX : 310-725-681 6 . . Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Admimstraiiv e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Lega l Assistan t FAX : 202-366-753 6

Sen'ic e wa s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r service i n perso n o r b y cxpediledcourier, use lli

c Jbllowin g address : Federa l Aviatio n Admini.siration , 60

0 Independence Avenue . S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2 W1000 , Washington , D

C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk, AGC-430 . 

### - 2 -
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ALBERTO R. ALGABA

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 3780

[ March 7, 2019 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Ernest A. Kollra, Jr

. , Judge; L.T. Case No. 12

- 13378CF10A

.

Alberto R. Algaba, Milton, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER

, C.J., T AYLOR and D AMOORGIAN

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Description of the 2005 Exec. Incentive Program



 






Exhibit 10.25




Description of the 2005 Executive Incentive Program




     The 2005 Executive Incentive Program (EIP) is an annual executive bonus program designed to
incentivize management to achieve specified performance objectives. Each executive participating
in the plan has a targeted incentive award based on competitive practice that represents a stated
percentage of the executive’s base salary. There are four performance criteria for the 2005 EIP,
incorporating both internal and external performance measurements. For internal performance, the
EIP incorporates three financial criteria — revenue growth, earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) improvement, and cash improvement, as compared to fiscal
year 2004. For external performance, the Compensation Committee set one performance criterion that
measures the Company’s revenue growth over 2004 relative to a peer group of selected competitors.
Each of the four criteria is weighted as a percent of the total incentive as follows: revenue
growth (40%), EBITDA improvement (35%), cash flow improvement (10%) and revenue growth versus peers
(15%). Each of the performance criteria has a threshold, target and maximum payout level. No
incentive is paid for performance below threshold. Payment at target is 100% and payment at maximum
is 200%. In addition, there is a cap related to the maximum aggregate incentive payment under the
plan, equal to 10% of 2005 EBITDA.
§ 3201.33 Carpets. ( a ) *Definition.* Floor coverings composed of woven, tufted, or knitted fiber and a backing system.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The preferred procurement product must have a biobased content of at least 7 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than May 14, 2009, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased carpet. By that date, Federal agencies that have the responsibility for drafting or reviewing specifications for items to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased carpet.
( d ) *Determining overlap with an EPA-designated recovered content product.* Qualifying biobased products that fall under this item may, in some cases, overlap with the EPA-designated recovered content product: Carpets (polyester). USDA is requesting that manufacturers of these qualifying biobased products provide information for the BioPreferred Web site of qualifying biobased products about the intended uses of the product, information on whether or not the product contains any recovered material, in addition to biobased ingredients, and performance standards against which the product has been tested. This information will assist Federal agencies in determining whether or not a qualifying biobased product overlaps with EPA-designated carpets (polyester) and which product should be afforded the preference in purchasing.
Note to paragraph ( d
):
Biobased carpets within this designated item can compete with polyester carpet products with recycled content. Under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, section 6002, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency designated carpets (polyester) containing recovered materials as items for which Federal agencies must give preference in their purchasing programs. The designation can be found in the Comprehensive Procurement Guideline, 40 CFR 247.12. EPA provides recovered materials content recommendations for carpets (polyester) in the May 1, 1995, Recovered Materials Advisory Notice (RMAN I). The RMAN recommendations can be found on EPA's Web site *http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/non-hw/procure/products.htm* and then clicking on the appropriate product name.
[73 FR 27973, May 14, 2008]
**EXHIBIT 32**     The following certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350 and in accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8238. These certifications shall not bedeemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, norshall they be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of1933, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any generalincorporation language in such filing.**Certification of Principal Executive Officer**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Volcom, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, tohis knowledge, that:     (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period endedMarch 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Dated: May 10, 2006 /s/ Richard R. Woolcott     Richard R. Woolcott  President, Chief Executive Officer and Director  (Principal Executive Officer)**Certification of Principal Financial Officer**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Volcom, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, tohis knowledge, that:     (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period endedMarch 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Dated: May 10, 2006 /s/ Douglas P. Collier     Douglas P. Collier  Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer  (Principal Financial Officer)     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toVolcom, Inc. and will be retained by Volcom, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
UNITED	STATES	DISTRICT	COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT	OF	FLORIDA

MATT	WRIGHT

Plaintiff,

v.

BUSINESS	VIEW	PUBLISHING, INC.

Defendant.

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT	AND

DISMISSAL	OF	CIVIL	ACTION	

WITH	PREJUDICE	(FRCP	

41(a)(1)(A)(i))

Case	No.:	1:20-cv-102-MW-GRJ

IT	IS	HEREBY	NOTICED that	the	above	case has	settled	and should	be	dismissed	

with prejudice with	both	sides	bearing	their	own	costs	and	attorney’s	fees.

/s/Richard	Liebowitz

Richard	P.	Liebowitz

Liebowitz	Law	Firm,	PLLC

11	Sunrise	Plaza,	Suite	305

Valley	Stream,	NY	11580

Tel:	(516)	233-1660

RL@LiebowitzLawFirm.com

Dated:	June	11,	2020

Attorneys	for	Plaintiff	Matt	Wright

Case 1:20-cv-00102-MW-GRJ Document 7 Filed 06/11/20 Page 1 of 1