alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Max Ryant Jewelers No. 2, Inc., Respondent-Appellant, v New York Telephone Company, Defendant, and Holmes Protection Inc., Appellant-Respondent.

Order of the Supreme Court, New York County, entered January 15,1980, unanimously modified, on the law, without costs and without disbursements, the second cause of action in the complaint reinstated against defendant Holmes, with liability for damages, if any, limited to the sum of $1,116, and otherwise affirmed. There is a triable issue of fact as to whether defendant Holmes was negligent in the installation and maintenance of the electric security system in plaintiffs premises (see *Rediscount Corp. of Amer. v Duke,*34 AD2d 898; see, also, *Glick & Dolleck v Tri-Pak Export Corp.,*22 NY2d 439, 441). Until that issue is resolved, it is premature to determine whether Holmes should pay damages to plaintiff for the burglary which occurred. Contrary to the contention of Holmes, clause 10 of the parties’ contract does not exculpate Holmes from liability for negligence. The clause does not express a clear, unmistakable intention of the parties to exempt Holmes from such liability (see *Gross v Sweet,*49 NY2d 102,107-110). It does, however, effectively limit Holmes’ liability for damages, if any, to the sum of $1,116, the amount of one year’s service charge under the contract *'(Florence v Merchants Cent. Alarm Co.,*51 NY2d 793). Concur—Birns, J. P., Fein, Markewich, Lupiano and Bloom, JJ.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.1


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

Aerospace Metals, Inc., a Delaware corporation
American Scrap Processing, Inc., an Illinois corporation
Briquetting Corporation of America, an Ohio corporation
California Metals Recycling, Inc., a California corporation
Charles Bluestone Company, a Pennsylvania corporation
CIM Trucking, Inc., an Illinois corporation
Cometco Corp., an Illinois corporation
Cozzi Building Corporation, an Illinois corporation
Cozzi Iron & Metal, Inc., an Illinois corporation
C Shredding Corp., an Illinois corporation
EMCO Trading, Inc., an Arizona corporation
Ferrex Trading Corporation, a Delaware corporation
Firma, Inc., a California corporation
Firma Plastic Co., Inc., a California corporation
Houston Compressed Steel Corp., a Texas corporation
HouTex Metals Company, Inc., a Texas corporation
The Isaac Corporation, an Ohio corporation
Kankakee Scrap Corporation, an Illinois corporation
Mac Leod Metals Co., a California corporation
Metal Management Arizona, Inc., an Arizona corporation
Metal Management Gulf Coast, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Metal Management Realty, Inc., an Arizona corporation
138 Scrap, Inc., an Illinois corporation
Paulding Recycling, Inc., an Ohio corporation
P. Joseph Iron & Metal, Inc., an Ohio corporation
Proler Southwest Inc., a Texas corporation
Proler Steelworks L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company
R&P Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation
R&P Real Estate, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation
Reserve Iron & Metal Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership
Salt River Recycling, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company
Scrap Processing, Inc., an Illinois corporation
Superior Forge, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Trojan Trading Co., a California corporation
USA Southwestern Carrier, Inc., an Arizona corporation
#### § 29.2665 Nondescript (N Group).

Extremely common tobacco which does not meet the minimum specifications or which exceeds the tolerance of the lowest grade of any other group except Scrap.

| Grades | Grade names and specifications |
| --- | --- |
| N1L | First Quality Light Colored Nondescript. |
| | Thin to medium body and 60 percent injury tolerance. |
| N1D | First Quality Dark Colored Nondescript. |
| | Medium to heavy body and 60 percent injury tolerance. |
| N1GL | First Quality Crude Green Nondescript from the C or B Groups 60 percent crude leaves or injury tolerance. |
| N1GX | First Quality Crude Green Nondescript from the X Group 60 percent crude leaves or injury tolerance. |
| N2 | Substandard Nondescript. |
| | Nondescript of any group or color; over 60 percent crude leaves or injury tolerance. |

[37 FR 13626, July 12, 1972, as amended at 49 FR 16757, Apr. 20, 1984; 51 FR 40407, Nov. 7, 1986]
Filed 10/21/2020 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2020 ND 219 

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Ginny Rose Lubitz, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20200118

Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, 

the Honorable John C. Irby, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Tracy E. Hines, Assistant State’s Attorney, Fargo, N.D., for plaintiff and 

appellee; submitted on brief.

Russell J. Myhre, Enderlin, N.D., for defendant and appellant; submitted on 

brief.
1

State v. Lubitz

No. 20200118

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Ginny Rose Lubitz appeals after a criminal judgment was entered on a 

jury verdict finding her guilty of murder. Lubitz argues that the evidence was 

insufficient to sustain the guilty verdict and that the district court erred in 

denying her request for a continuance because the State failed to turn over 

discovery in a timely manner. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 

35.1(a)(3) and (4).

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.

Jerod E. Tufte 

Lisa Fair McEvers 

Gerald W. VandeWalle

Daniel J. Crothers
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 16, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 70014]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28841]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel; Stroke.
    Date: December 14, 2010.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Richard D. Crosland, PhD, Scientific Review 
Administrator, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Research, NINDS/NIH/DHHS, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Blvd., 
Room 3204, MSC 9529, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-0635, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f7a594c5c6cf82b7999e9fd9909881"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cf9dacfdfef7ba8fa1a6a7e1a8a0b9">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 9, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-28841 Filed 11-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
United States District Court

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Case No.: 4:20cv236-RH-MJF Date: July 20, 2020 

KIRK NIELSEN et al. v. RON DESANTIS et al. 

DOCKET ENTRY: Motion Hearing Held (by video) 10:00 - 10:36 a.m.

Court hears statements from parties regarding settlement, and argument of counsel on Motion 

for Settlement Conference and Motion for Leave. Ruling by Court: Nielsen and Williams 

Plaintiffs’ claims are dismissed. Grubb Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Supplement is 

granted. Magistrate Judge will conduct settlement conference. Trial is continued to July 27 at 

10:00 a.m. An order will follow. 

PRESENT: ROBERT L. HINKLE, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

Cindy Markley Judy Gagnon 

Deputy Clerk Court Reporter 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs: Attorneys for Defendants: 

Matthew Dietz (Grubb plaintiffs) – Speaker Mohammad Jazil – Speaker

John Devaney (Nielsen plaintiffs) – Speaker John Lavia 

Frederick Wermuth (Nielsen plaintiffs) Robert Shearman

Stuart Naifeh (Williams plaintiffs) – Speaker Andy Bardos 

John Ulin (Williams plaintiffs) Susan Erdelyi 

(others may have been present but were Jason Torchinsky – Speaker

not identified) Jonathan Lienhard 

Jeffrey DeSousa – Speaker

Jon Jouben 

Benjamin Gibson 

Frank Mari – Speaker

Michael Valdes

Dale Scott

Ronald Labasky – Speaker

Francis Carroll – Speaker 

(others may have been present but were not 

identified)

______________________________________________________________________________

PROCEEDINGS: Status Conference/Motion Hearing Held 

10:00 Court in session 

Court addresses parties regarding settlement
10:05 Ruling by Court: Dismissal will be with prejudice as to the Nielsen and Williams 

Plaintiffs with the exception of Claim 14 in the More Definite Statement, and that claim 

will be dismissed without prejudice as to County and with prejudice as to State.

10:07 Acknowledgment by Nielsen Plaintiffs (Devaney)

10:08 Acknowledgment by Williams Plaintiffs (Naifeh)

10:11 Statement to Court by Defendants re: settlement (Jazil)

10:15 Statement to Court by Nielsen Plaintiffs re: settlement (Devaney)

10:18 Statement to Court by Williams Plaintiffs re: settlement (Naifeh)

10:21 Statement by Grubb Plaintiffs re: motion for settlement conference and continuance of 

trial (Dietz)

10:23 Response by Defendants (Labasky)

10:24 Response by Defendants (Bardos)

10:25 Response by Defendants (Carroll)

10:26 Response by Defendants (Shearman)

Court addresses parties re: attendance of parties at settlement conference

10:29 Ruling by Court: Magistrate Judge will hold settlement conference. An order will 

follow. Trial will be continued to July 27 at 10:00 a.m. 

10:30 Statement by Grubb Plaintiffs re: trial witnesses and motion for leave to file (Dietz)

10:32 Ruling by Court: Motion for Leave is granted.

10:32 Statement by Nielsen Plaintiffs re: dismissal with regard to fees and costs (Devaney)

10:33 Statement by Defendants re: Grubb claims (Jazil)

10:35 Defendants withdraw opposition to supplement (Mari)

10:36 Court adjourned

Initials of Clerk: ckm
#### Aaron J. Goldman and J. R. Rosefield, defendants in error, v. A. M. Friede and S. Kirschenbaum, plaintiffs in error.

Gen. No. 37,304.

Opinion filed November 27, 1934.

Harry D. Koenig and Samuel W. Banovitz, for plaintiffs in error; Clyde C. Fisher, of counsel. No appearance for defendants in error.

Mr. Presiding Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.
§ 3201.119 Intermediates—Rubber Materials. ( a ) *Definition.* Intermediates—Rubber Materials are used in finished products such as rubber gloves, vehicle tires, footwear, sports apparel and equipment, bedding and pillow foams, tubing, catheters, gasketing, or cosmetic adhesives and bases.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The Federal preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 96 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than July 10, 2019, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased Intermediates—Rubber Materials. By that date, Federal agencies responsible for drafting or reviewing specifications for products to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased Intermediates—Rubber Materials.
[83 FR 31848, July 10, 2018]
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

NYDEED B.K. NASHAD’DAI,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:03cv297-WS

GEORGE B. SAPP, 

LIEUTENANT J.A. PICKLES,

SERGEANT R. W. LONG,

SERGEANT PADGET,

SERGEANT PHILMAN,

SERGEANT BRYAN,

OFFICER D.H. BEVIS,

UNKNOWN MAJOR OF SECURITY,

UNKNOWN OFFICER #2,

UNKNOWN OFFICER #3,

Defendants.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 61)

docketed September 19, 2005. The magistrate judge recommends that the defendants’

motion for summary judgment be granted in part and denied in part. No objections to

the report and recommendation have been filed.

Upon review of the record, the court has determined that the report and

recommendation should be adopted. 

Case 4:03-cv-00297-WS-CAS Document 62 Filed 12/01/05 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 4:03cv303-WS

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation is ADOPTED and 

incorporated by reference into this order.

2. The defendants’ motion for summary judgment (doc. 42) is GRANTED as to

the plaintiff’s First Amendment claim but is otherwise DENIED.

3. The case shall be remanded to the magistrate judge for further proceedings.

DONE AND ORDERED this December 1, 2005.

 /s William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:03-cv-00297-WS-CAS Document 62 Filed 12/01/05 Page 2 of 2
#### § 29.3551 Strips.

The sides of a tobacco leaf from which the stem has been removed or a lot of tobacco composed of strips.

[30 FR 9207, July 23, 1965. Redesignated at 49 FR 16759, Apr. 20, 1984]
§ 3.75 Request for a hearing. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, an employee must file a petition to request a hearing that is received by USDA not later than 30 days from the date of the USDA notice described in § 3.74, if an employee wants a hearing concerning: ( 1 ) The existence or amount of the debt; or
( 2 ) USDA's proposed salary offset schedule (including percentage).
( b ) The petition must be signed by the employee and must identify and explain with reasonable specificity and brevity the facts, evidence and witnesses which the employee believes support his or her position. If the employee objects to the percentage of disposable pay to be deducted from each check, the petition must state the objection and the reasons for it.
( c ) If the employee files a petition for a hearing later than the 30 days as described in paragraph (a) of this section, the hearing officer may accept the request if the employee can show that the delay was because of circumstances beyond his or her control or because of failure to receive notice of the filing deadline (unless the employee has actual notice of the filing deadline).
2005-1121.

#### State ex rel. Moorehead v. Indus. Comm.

Franklin App. No. 04AP-404, 2005-Ohio-2667. On request for oral argument. Request granted.
#### § 29.108 Certificate issuance.

A certificate shall be issued as soon as practicable after any tobacco has been inspected or weighed for the purpose of the Act. A separate certificate shall be issued for each lot of tobacco inspected or weighed, except when a certificate covering two or more lots is specifically authorized by the Director. In case of a lost or destroyed certificate, a duplicate thereof may be issued under the same number, date, and name by an authorized supervising official. Any such duplicate certificate shall be plainly marked “Duplicate” above the signature of the supervising official who issued it.
§ 1775.66 Purpose. Grants may be made to organizations as defined in § 1775.65 to enable such organizations to assist associations to: ( a ) Provide technical assistance and/or training to reduce the solid waste stream through reduction, recycling, and reuse.
( b ) Provide training to enhance operator skills in maintaining and operating active landfills.
( c ) Provide technical assistance and/or training for operators of landfills which are closed or will be closed in the near future with the development/implementation of closure plans, future land use plans, safety and maintenance planning, and closure scheduling within permit requirements.
( d ) Evaluate current landfill conditions to determine the threats to water resources.
( e ) Pay the expenses associated with providing the technical assistance and/or training authorized in paragraphs (a) through (d) of this section.
§ 3430.19 Resubmission of an application. ( a ) *Previously unfunded applications.* ( 1 ) Applications that are resubmitted to a program, after being previously submitted but not funded by that program, must include the following information: ( i ) The NIFA-assigned proposal number of the previously submitted application.
( ii ) Summary of the previous reviewers' comments.
( iii ) Explanation of how the previous reviewers' comments or previous panel summary have been addressed in the current application.
( 2 ) Resubmitting an application that has been revised based on previous reviewers' critiques does not guarantee the application will be recommended for funding.
( b ) *Previously funded applications.* ( 1 ) NIFA competitive programs are generally not designed to support multiple Federal assistance awards activities that are essentially repetitive in nature. PDs who have had their projects funded previously are discouraged from resubmitting relatively identical applications for further funding. Applications that are sequential continuations or new stages of previously funded projects must compete with first-time applications, and should thoroughly demonstrate how the proposed project expands substantially on previously funded efforts and promotes innovation and creativity beyond the scope of the previously funded project.
( 2 ) An application may be submitted only once to NIFA. The submission of duplicative or substantially similar applications concurrently for review by more than one program will result in the exclusion of the redundant applications from NIFA consideration.
Exhibit 21

                            Subsidiary of Registrant

                        Avesis of Washington, D.C., Inc.

                  State of Incorporation: District of Columbia
       Name under which business is done: Avesis of Washington, D.C., Inc.


                         Avesis Reinsurance Incorporated

                         State of Incorporation: Arizona
       Name under which business is done: Avesis Reinsurance Incorporated


                     Avesis Third Party Administrators, Inc.

                         State of Incorporation: Arizona
   Name under which business is done: Avesis Third Party Administrators, Inc.


                            Avesis of New York, Inc.

                        State of Incorporation: New York
           Name under which business is done: Avesis of New York, Inc.


                               AbsoluteCare, Inc.

                        State of Incorporation: Delaware
              Name under which business is done: AbsoluteCare, Inc.
#### § 29.2440 (N Group).

Extremely common tobacco which does not meet the minimum specifications or which exceeds the tolerance of the lowest grade of any other group except scrap.

| U.S. grades | Grade names and specifications |
| --- | --- |
| N1L | First quality light colored nondescript, thin to medium body and 50 percent injury tolerance. |
| N1D | First quality dark colored nondescript, medium to heavy body and 50 percent injury tolerance. |
| N1GL | First quality light colored crude green nondescript, thin to medium body and 50 percent crude leaves or injury tolerance. |
| N1GD | First quality dark colored crude green nondescript, medium to heavy body and 50 percent crude leaves or injury tolerance. |
| N2 | Substandard Nondescript—Nondescript of any group or color, over 50 percent crude leaves or injury tolerance. |

[45 FR 47115, July 14, 1980]
#### § 29.2270 Foreign matter.

Any extraneous substance or material such as stalks, suckers, straw, strings, rubber bands, and abnormal amounts of dirt or sand. (See Rule 22, § 29.2413.)
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-07-14T20:15:21-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2337 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2337

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To provide for the conveyance of the Forest Service Lake Hill 
            Administrative Site in Summit County, Colorado.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Lake Hill Administrative Site 
Affordable Housing Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) County.--The term ``County'' means Summit County, 
        Colorado.
            (2) Lake hill administrative site.--The term ``Lake Hill 
        Administrative Site'' means the parcel of approximately 40 
        acres of National Forest System land in the County, as depicted 
        on the map entitled ``Lake Hill Administrative Site'' and dated 
        June 2012.
            (3) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of Agriculture.

SEC. 3. CONVEYANCE OF FOREST SERVICE LAKE HILL ADMINISTRATIVE SITE, 
              SUMMIT COUNTY, COLORADO.

    (a) Conveyance Authority.--Upon receipt of an offer from the County 
in which the County agrees to the condition imposed by subsection (c), 
the Secretary shall use the authority provided by the Forest Service 
Facility Realignment and Enhancement Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-54; 16 
U.S.C. 580d note) to convey to the County all right, title, and 
interest of the United States in and to the Forest Service Lake Hill 
Administrative Site.
    (b) Application of Law.--
            (1) Treatment as administrative site.--The Lake Hill 
        Administrative Site is considered to be an administrative site 
        under section 502(1)(A) of the Forest Service Facility 
        Realignment and Enhancement Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-54; 16 
        U.S.C. 580d note).
            (2) Exception.--Section 502(1)(C) of that Act does not 
        apply to the conveyance of the Lake Hill Administrative Site.
    (c) Costs.--The County shall be responsible for processing and 
transaction costs related to the direct sale under subsection (a).
    (d) Proceeds.--Proceeds received from the conveyance pursuant to 
subsection (a) shall be available, without further appropriation and 
until expended, for capital improvement and maintenance of Forest 
Service facilities in Region 2 of the United States Forest Service.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 29, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2337

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

     To provide for the conveyance of the Forest Service Lake Hill 
            Administrative Site in Summit County, Colorado.
```