alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SERVED JUNE 15, 2012 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

DANIEL QUINONEZ 

Respondent 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Proceeding) 

DMS NO. FAA-2012-0473 

ZOIZ JUi~ l 5 P 2: 3<1 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2012EA610020) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

persons on the attached Service List. 

Chief Administrativ 

Attachment - Service List 

. ·~; .. 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

ONE COPY 

Daniel Quinonez, Respondent 

c/o Frances Vargas- Respondent's daughter 

1012 Eastern A venue · 

Fall River, MA 02723 

TEL: 508-496-8710 

R. Bennett Sargent, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

New England Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

12 England Executive Park, ANE-7 

Burlington, MA 01803 

TEL: 781-238-7058 

FAX: 781-238-7055 

The Honorable J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department ofTransporta1ion 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012-0473 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 

600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DG20591; Attention: 

Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO: 3:97cr111/LAC 

3:03cv467/LAC/MD

CHARLES JUSTE

_____________________________________________________________________

ORDER

The defendant has filed a notice of appeal (doc. 328) and a motion for certificate of

appealability (doc. 329) with respect to the order entered on January 25, 2005 (doc. 322).

Unless a certificate of appealability is issued, the defendant may not take an appeal from

the final order denying section 2255 relief. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(1)(B). Such a certificate

may issue “only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).

Because the defendant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right, and for the reasons set forth in this court’s order of January 25, 2005,

a certificate of appealability is DENIED.

No motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis has been filed. The defendant

has not shown that the appeal is taken in good faith or that he is otherwise entitled to so

proceed on appeal. Accordingly, the $255.00 filing fee shall be paid within 30 days from

the date of this order.

DONE AND ORDERED this 7th day of June, 2005.

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:97-cr-00111-LC-MD Document 333 Filed 06/07/05 Page 1 of 1
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21
- 7020

ABDU

- SALIM GOULD, Petitioner

- Appellant,

v. TODD E. ISHEE, Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Dever III , District Judge. ( 5:20

- hc

- 02074

- D )

Submitted : December 21, 2021 Decided: December 27, 2021

Before KING and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Abdu

- Salim Gould , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 21-7020 Doc: 11 Filed: 12/27/2021 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Abdu

- Salim Gould seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealabilit y will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists c ould find t he district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedu ral ruling is debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the reco rd and conclude that Gould has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Gould’s motion s for a certificate of appealability and for leave to file an amicus curiae brief, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 21-7020 Doc: 11 Filed: 12/27/2021 Pg: 2 of 2
§ 301.51-3 Quarantined areas. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the Administrator will list as a quarantined area each State or portion of a State in which the Asian longhorned beetle is present, in which the Administrator has reason to believe that the Asian longhorned beetle is present, or that the Administrator considers necessary to regulate because of its inseparability for quarantine enforcement purposes from localities where the Asian longhorned beetle has been found. The Administrator will publish a list of all quarantined areas (the quarantine list) on the Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ) website at *www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/planthealth/plant-pest-and-disease-programs/pests-and-diseases/asian-longhorned-beetle/asian-longhorned-beetle .* The list will include the date that the list was last updated. Lists of all quarantined areas may also be obtained by request from any local PPQ office; local offices are listed in telephone directories and on the internet at *www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/planthealth/ppq-program-overview/sphd .* After a change is made to the list of quarantined areas, APHIS will publish a notice in the Federal Register informing the public that the change has occurred and describing the change to the quarantined areas. Less than an entire State will be designated as a quarantined area only if the Administrator determines that: ( 1 ) The State has adopted and is enforcing restrictions on the intrastate movement of regulated articles that are equivalent to those imposed by this subpart on the interstate movement of regulated articles; and
( 2 ) The designation of less than an entire State as a quarantined area will be adequate to prevent the artificial interstate spread of the Asian longhorned beetle.
( b ) The Administrator may temporarily designate any nonquarantined area as a quarantined area in accordance with the criteria specified in paragraph (a) of this section. The Administrator will give written notice of this designation to owner or person in possession of the nonquarantined area, or in the case of publicly owned land, to the person responsible for the management of nonquarantined area. Thereafter, the interstate movement of any regulated articles from an area temporarily designated as quarantined area is subject to this subpart. As soon as practicable, this area will either be added to the quarantine list or the Administrator will terminate the designation. The owner or, in the case of publicly owned land, the person responsible for the management of, an area for which the designation has terminated will be given written notice of the termination as soon as practicable.
[87 FR 80006, Dec. 29, 2022] [62 FR 10416, Mar. 7, 1997, as amended at 87 FR 80006, Dec. 29, 2022]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO. 4:02cr25-SPM

RENEE ROOKS CLARK,

Defendant.

____________________________/

ORDER REVOKING BOND

Defendant was sentenced to a term of 10 months imprisonment on April 

21, 2008. The Court allowed Defendant to remain on bond until 12:00 p.m. on

May 20, 2008, at which time she was to self-surrender to the United States

Marshal or to the facility designated by the United States Bureau of Prisons. 

Defendant has failed to keep in contact with her mental health counselor,

as required by her bond and the conditions of her release. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. Defendant’s bond is revoked and her self-surrender date is

rescinded.

2. The United States Marshal shall take Defendant into custody

immediately to begin service of her sentence.

DONE AND ORDERED this 6th day of May, 2008.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 4:02-cr-00025-MW Document 49 Filed 05/06/08 Page 1 of 1
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2353 

To amend title 23, United States Code, with respect to the operation of 

vehicles on certain Wisconsin highways, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 13, 2013 

Mr. PETRI (for himself and Mr. RIBBLE) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 23, United States Code, with respect to 

the operation of vehicles on certain Wisconsin highways, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. OPERATION OF VEHICLES ON CERTAIN WIS4 CONSIN HIGHWAYS. 

5 Section 127 of title 23, United States Code, is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(j) OPERATION OF VEHICLES ON CERTAIN WIS8 CONSIN HIGHWAYS.—If any segment of the United States 

9 Route 41 corridor, as described in section 1105(c)(57) of 

10 the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2353 IH

1 1991, is designated as a route on the Interstate System, 

2 a vehicle that could operate legally on that segment before 

3 the date of such designation may continue to operate on 

4 that segment, without regard to any requirement under 

5 subsection (a).’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2006-0395.

#### Akron Bar Assn. v. Holder.

This matter is pending before the court on the final report of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline recommending discipline of respondent. This court issued an order to show cause in this matter on March 16, 2006. On April 17, 2006, respondent filed objections. On April 27, 2006, relator filed a motion to strike evidence not in the record or in the alternative for leave to supplement the record to respond to such evidence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by this court that relator’s motion to strike evidence not in the record is granted.

Resnick, J., would grant leave to supplement the record to respond to such evidence.
§ 2500.023 Selection of reviewers. ( a ) *Requirement.* OAO is responsible for performing a review of proposals submitted to OAO competitive award programs. The RFP will identify the criteria that OAO will use for the selection of the proposal review panel.
( b ) *Confidentiality.* The identities of reviewers will remain confidential to the maximum extent possible. Therefore, the names of reviewers will not be released to applicants. Names of applicants, as well as proposal content and evaluation comments will be kept confidential to the extent permitted by law, except to those involved in the review process. Reviewers will comply with the above-mentioned confidentiality guidelines.
( c ) *Conflicts of interest.* During the evaluation process, extreme care will be taken to prevent any actual or perceived conflicts of interest that may impact review or evaluation. Reviewers are expected to be in compliance with the Conflict-of-Interest process made a part of the RFP.
§ 318.47-2 Articles the movement of which is prohibited or regulated. ( a ) *Articles prohibited movement.* The movement of seed cotton, cottonseed, and seedy waste, when unfumigated, is prohibited except as provided in § 318.47-3(b)(2).
( b ) *Articles the movement of which is regulated.* Lint; linters; waste; seed cotton; cottonseed; cottonseed hulls, cake, and meal; and bale covers may be moved upon compliance with the conditions prescribed in § 318.47-3.
#### § 28.115 Fees and costs; payment.

All charges for practical forms of cotton standards and all fees and expenses for services of inspection of bales and supervision of sampling, classification, comparison, or review by a Classing Office shall be paid at the time of filing the request for the service desired, except that in the discretion of the Director bills may be delivered to persons from whom payment or charges or fees may become due. Such bills shall be rendered as soon as practicable after the last day of each month for amounts due and unpaid on such dates. When necessary, in the discretion of the Area Director, any bill may be rendered at an earlier date for any charges or fees then due from the person to whom such bill may be rendered. Payment of any such bill shall be made as soon as possible after the rendition thereof, but in any event not later than the expiration of 2 weeks thereafter.

[52 FR 30883, Aug. 18, 1987]
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1




INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-30917 of Sterling Chemicals Holdings, Inc. on Form S-3 and Registration
Statement No. 333-52795 of Sterling Chemicals Holdings, Inc. on Form S-8 of our
report dated December 4, 1998 (December 17, 1998 as to Notes 4, 11, and 12),
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sterling Chemicals Holdings,
Inc. for the year ended September 30, 1998.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
December 17, 1998
Houston, Texas
#### KELLY, Respondent, v. BROOKLYN BOROUGH GAS CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 12, 1906.)

Action by Loretta Kelly, an infant, by Joseph Kelly, her guardian ad ~item, against the Brooklyn Borough Gas Company.

No opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal granted.
§ 301.1-1 Definitions. *Administrator.* The Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), or any person authorized to act for the Administrator.
*Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS).* The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service of the United States Department of Agriculture.
*Biological control organism.* Any enemy, antagonist, or competitor used to control a plant pest or noxious weed.
*Interstate commerce.* Trade, traffic, or other commerce ( 1 ) From one State into or through any other State or
( 2 ) Within the District of Columbia, Guam, the Virgin Islands of the United States, or any other territory or possession of the United States.
*Move (moved, movement).* Shipped, offered to a common carrier for shipment, received for transportation or transported by a common carrier, or carried, transported, moved or allowed to be moved.
*Noxious weed.* Any plant or plant product that can directly or indirectly injure or cause damage to crops (including nursery stock or plant products), livestock, poultry, or other interests of agriculture, irrigation, navigation, the natural resources of the United States, the public health or the environment.
*Plant pest.* Any living stage of any insects, mites, nematodes, slugs, snails, protozoa, or other invertebrate animals, bacteria, fungi, other parasitic plants or reproductive parts thereof, viruses, or any organisms similar to or allied with any of the foregoing, or any infectious substances which can directly or indirectly injure or cause disease or damage in any plants or parts thereof or any processed, manufactured, or other products of plants.
*State.* The District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands, or any State, territory, or possession of the United States.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                                CONSILIUM, INC.
                           SCHEDULE OF SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SUBSIDIARY                 JURISDICTION      NAME
--------------------   -------------------   -----------------------------------
<S>                    <C>                   <C>
Consilium Germany      Germany               Consilium GmbH
                     
Consilium France       France                Consilium France SARL
                     
Consilium FSC          Virgin Islands        Consilium Foreign Sales Corporation
                     
Consilium Asia, Inc.   California            Consilium Asia, Inc.

Consilium Japan        Japan                 Nihon Consilium, K.K.
</TABLE>
Order entered May 19, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01329-CV

ALBERT LUTTERODT, Appellant

V.

EMILY LANE OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-12648-G

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this appeal was filed November 24, 2015, but it did not include 

the trial exhibits. We have attempted, in three prior orders, to ensure the exhibits are filed. Our 

last order, entered April 16, 2015, directed court reporter Vielica Dobbins to file, no later than 

May 1, 2015, a supplemental record containing all trial exhibits even though she had not 

received full payment of her fees. Our order was based on the delay the lack of a complete 

record is causing in the appeal, e-mail exchanges appellant provided us showing Ms. Dobbins 

had agreed to a payment plan, and what appeared to be a successful payment plan of the fees 

associated with the record that has been filed. By letter dated May 8, 2015, Ms. Dobbins 

informed us that she had not discussed, or approved, payment arrangements with appellant and 

she is unable to front the cost of preparing the supplemental record.
Because this appeal cannot proceed with an incomplete record and appellant and the 

court reporter disagree as to the payment of the reporter’s fee, we ORDER the Honorable Dale 

Tillery, Presiding Judge of the 134th Judicial District Court, to conduct a hearing no later than 

June 17, 2015 and make findings, based on live or affidavit testimony, as to

•the amount of Ms. Dobbins’s fee;

•whether Ms. Dobbins agreed to accept payment of her fee in installments;

•if Ms. Dobbins agreed to a payment plan, whether specific terms were set;

•if specific terms were set, what those terms were;

•if no specific terms were set, what terms would be satisfactory to appellant and Ms. 

Dobbins; and,

•the amount appellant has paid to date for the record of the exhibits.

We further ORDER Dallas County District Clerk Felicia Pitre to file no later than June 

22, 2015 a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s findings of fact from the 

hearing. The reporter’s record from this hearing shall also be filed no later than June 22, 2015.

We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to Judge Tillery, Ms. 

Pitre, Ms. Dobbins, and counsel for all parties.

We ABATE this appeal to allow the trial court an opportunity to conduct the hearing. 

The appeal will be reinstated June 23, 2015 or when the Court receives the requested records of 

the hearing, whichever occurs sooner. 

 

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
§ 3201.107 Water turbine bearing oils. ( a ) *Definition.* Lubricants that are specifically formulated for use in the bearings found in water turbines for electric power generation. Previously designated turbine drip oils are used to lubricate bearings of shaft driven water well turbine pumps.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The Federal preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 46 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than June 11, 2014, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased water turbine bearing oils. By that date, Federal agencies that have the responsibility for drafting or reviewing specifications for products to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased water turbine bearing oils.
[78 FR 34872, June 11, 2013]
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2337 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 30, 2013 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT 

To provide for the conveyance of the Forest Service Lake 

Hill Administrative Site in Summit County, Colorado. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

HR 2337 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lake Hill Administra3 tive Site Affordable Housing Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

5 In this Act: 

6 (1) COUNTY.—The term ‘‘County’’ means Sum7 mit County, Colorado. 

8 (2) LAKE HILL ADMINISTRATIVE SITE.—The 

9 term ‘‘Lake Hill Administrative Site’’ means the 

10 parcel of approximately 40 acres of National Forest 

11 System land in the County, as depicted on the map 

12 entitled ‘‘Lake Hill Administrative Site’’ and dated 

13 June 2012. 

14 (3) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

15 the Secretary of Agriculture. 

16 SEC. 3. CONVEYANCE OF FOREST SERVICE LAKE HILL AD17 MINISTRATIVE SITE, SUMMIT COUNTY, COLO18 RADO. 

19 (a) CONVEYANCE AUTHORITY.—Upon receipt of an 

20 offer from the County in which the County agrees to the 

21 condition imposed by subsection (c), the Secretary shall 

22 use the authority provided by the Forest Service Facility 

23 Realignment and Enhancement Act of 2005 (Public Law 

24 109–54; 16 U.S.C. 580d note) to convey to the County 

25 all right, title, and interest of the United States in and 

26 to the Forest Service Lake Hill Administrative Site. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

HR 2337 RFS

1 (b) APPLICATION OF LAW.— 

2 (1) TREATMENT AS ADMINISTRATIVE SITE.— 

3 The Lake Hill Administrative Site is considered to 

4 be an administrative site under section 502(1)(A) of 

5 the Forest Service Facility Realignment and En6 hancement Act of 2005 (Public Law 109–54; 16 

7 U.S.C. 580d note). 

8 (2) EXCEPTION.—Section 502(1)(C) of that 

9 Act does not apply to the conveyance of the Lake 

10 Hill Administrative Site. 

11 (c) COSTS.—The County shall be responsible for 

12 processing and transaction costs related to the direct sale 

13 under subsection (a). 

14 (d) PROCEEDS.—Proceeds received from the convey15 ance pursuant to subsection (a) shall be available, without 

16 further appropriation and until expended, for capital im17 provement and maintenance of Forest Service facilities in 

18 Region 2 of the United States Forest Service. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 29, 

2013. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS