PERMIT TO OPERATE

Under the authority of RSMo 643 and the Federal Clean Air Act the applicant is authorized to

operate the air contaminant source(s) described below, in accordance with the laws, rules, and

conditions set forth here in.

Operating Permit Number:

Expiration Date:

Project Number: 2240-0030-014

Installation Name and Address

Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant

4201 North River Boulevard

Sugar Creek, MO 64050

Jackson County

Parent Company's Name and Address

Lafarge Corporation

4000 Town Center, Suite 2000

Southfield, MI 48075

Installation Description:

Lafarge Corporation operates a limestone quarry and Portland cement plant

in Sugar Creek, Missouri.

Effective Date Director or Designee

Department of Natural Resources
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 2

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Table of Contents

I. INSTALLATION DESCRIPTION AND EQUIPMENT LISTING...................................................8

INSTALLATION DESCRIPTION.....................................................................................................8

EMISSION UNITS WITH LIMITATIONS.........................................................................................8

EMISSION UNITS WITHOUT LIMITATIONS................................................................................10

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE ......................................................................10

II. PLANT WIDE EMISSION LIMITATIONS .......................................................................11

Permit Condition PW001......................................................................................................11

10 CSR 10-6.170........................................................................................................................................... 11

Permit Condition PW002......................................................................................................12

10 CSR 10-6.250........................................................................................................................................... 12

Permit Condition PW003......................................................................................................12

10 CSR 10-6.080........................................................................................................................................... 12

40 CFR Part 61 Subpart M............................................................................................................................ 12

Permit Condition PW004......................................................................................................13

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ........................................................................................................................ 13

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A............................................................................................................................ 13

Permit Condition PW005......................................................................................................15

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ........................................................................................................................ 15

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A............................................................................................................................ 15

Permit Condition PW006......................................................................................................16

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ........................................................................................................................ 16

Permit Condition PW007......................................................................................................18

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ........................................................................................................................ 18

Permit Condition PW008......................................................................................................19

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ........................................................................................................................ 19

III. EMISSION UNIT SPECIFIC EMISSION LIMITATIONS.......................................................21

EU0010 through EU0040 ....................................................................................................21

Permit Condition EU0010-001 through EU0040-001...........................................................21

10 CSR 10-2.060........................................................................................................................................... 21

10 CSR 10-6.220........................................................................................................................................... 21

EU0050 Through EU0070....................................................................................................22

Permit Condition EU0050-001 through EU0070-001...........................................................22

10 CSR 10-2.060........................................................................................................................................... 22

10 CSR 10-6.220........................................................................................................................................... 22

EU0080 ...............................................................................................................................24

Permit Condition EU0080-001 .............................................................................................24

10 CSR 10-2.060........................................................................................................................................... 24

10 CSR 10-6.220........................................................................................................................................... 24

Permit Condition EU0080-002 .............................................................................................25

10 CSR 10-2.030........................................................................................................................................... 25

EU0090 ...............................................................................................................................26

Permit Condition EU0090-001 .............................................................................................26

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ........................................................................................................................ 26

Permit Condition EU0090-002 .............................................................................................28

10 CSR 10-2.060........................................................................................................................................... 28

10 CSR 10-6.220........................................................................................................................................... 28

Permit Condition EU0090-003 .............................................................................................29

10 CSR 10-2.030........................................................................................................................................... 29

EU0100 ...............................................................................................................................29
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 3

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0100-001 .............................................................................................29

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ........................................................................................................................ 29

Permit Condition EU0100-002 .............................................................................................31

10 CSR 10-2.060........................................................................................................................................... 31

10 CSR 10-6.220........................................................................................................................................... 31

EU0110 ...............................................................................................................................32

Permit Condition EU0110-001 .............................................................................................32

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ........................................................................................................................ 32

Permit Condition EU0110-002 .............................................................................................34

10 CSR 10-2.060........................................................................................................................................... 34

10 CSR 10-6.220........................................................................................................................................... 34

Permit Condition EU0110-003 .............................................................................................35

10 CSR 10-2.030........................................................................................................................................... 35

EU0120 ...............................................................................................................................35

Permit Condition EU0120-001 .............................................................................................35

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ........................................................................................................................ 35

Permit Condition EU0120-002 .............................................................................................37

10 CSR 10-2.060........................................................................................................................................... 37

10 CSR 10-6.220........................................................................................................................................... 37

Permit Condition EU0120-003 .............................................................................................38

10 CSR 10-2.030........................................................................................................................................... 38

EU0130 ...............................................................................................................................39

Permit Condition EU0130-001 .............................................................................................39

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ........................................................................................................................ 39

Permit Condition EU0130-002 .............................................................................................41

10 CSR 10-2.060........................................................................................................................................... 41

10 CSR 10-6.220........................................................................................................................................... 41

Permit Condition EU0130-003 .............................................................................................42

10 CSR 10-2.030........................................................................................................................................... 42

EU0140 through EU0160 and EU0190................................................................................43

Permit Condition EU0140-001 through EU0160-001 and EU0190-001 ...............................43

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ........................................................................................................................ 43

Permit Condition EU0140-002 through EU0160-002 and EU0190-002 ...............................45

10 CSR 10-2.060........................................................................................................................................... 45

10 CSR 10-6.220........................................................................................................................................... 45

Permit Condition EU0140-003 through EU0160-003 and EU0190-003 ...............................46

10 CSR 10-2.030........................................................................................................................................... 46

EU0170 through EU0180 ....................................................................................................47

Permit Condition EU0170-001 through EU0180-001...........................................................47

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ........................................................................................................................ 47

Permit Condition EU0170-002 through EU0180-002...........................................................49

10 CSR 10-2.060........................................................................................................................................... 49

10 CSR 10-6.220........................................................................................................................................... 49

Permit Condition EU0170-003 through EU0180-003...........................................................50

10 CSR 10-2.030........................................................................................................................................... 50

EU0200 ...............................................................................................................................51

Permit Condition EU0200-001 .............................................................................................51

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ........................................................................................................................ 51

Permit Condition EU0200-002 .............................................................................................53

10 CSR 10-2.060........................................................................................................................................... 53

10 CSR 10-6.220........................................................................................................................................... 53

Permit Condition EU0200-003 .............................................................................................54

10 CSR 10-2.030........................................................................................................................................... 54

Permit Condition EU0200-004 .............................................................................................55

10 CSR 10-6.260........................................................................................................................................... 55
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 4

Project No. 2240-0030-014

EU0210 through EU0230 and EU0260................................................................................55

Permit Condition EU0210-001 through EU0230-001 and EU0260-001 ...............................55

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ........................................................................................................................ 55

Permit Condition EU0210-002 through EU0230-002 and EU0260-002 ...............................57

10 CSR 10-2.060........................................................................................................................................... 57

10 CSR 10-6.220........................................................................................................................................... 57

Permit Condition EU0210-003 through EU0230-003 and EU0260-003 ...............................58

10 CSR 10-2.030........................................................................................................................................... 58

EU0240 through EU0250 ....................................................................................................59

Permit Condition EU0240-001 through EU0250-001...........................................................59

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ........................................................................................................................ 59

Permit Condition EU0240-002 through EU0250-002...........................................................61

10 CSR 10-2.060........................................................................................................................................... 61

10 CSR 10-6.220........................................................................................................................................... 61

Permit Condition EU0240-003 through EU0250-003...........................................................62

10 CSR 10-2.030........................................................................................................................................... 62

EU0270 ...............................................................................................................................63

Permit Condition EU0270-001 .............................................................................................63

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ........................................................................................................................ 63

Permit Condition EU0270-002 .............................................................................................65

10 CSR 10-2.060........................................................................................................................................... 65

10 CSR 10-6.220........................................................................................................................................... 65

Permit Condition EU0270-003 .............................................................................................66

10 CSR 10-2.030........................................................................................................................................... 66

Permit Condition EU0270-004 .............................................................................................67

10 CSR 10-6.260........................................................................................................................................... 67

EU0280 through EU0300 ....................................................................................................67

Permit Condition EU0280-001 through EU0300-001...........................................................68

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ........................................................................................................................ 68

Permit Condition EU0280-002 through EU0300-002...........................................................70

10 CSR 10-2.060........................................................................................................................................... 70

10 CSR 10-6.220........................................................................................................................................... 70

Permit Condition EU0280-003 through EU0300-003...........................................................71

10 CSR 10-2.030........................................................................................................................................... 71

EU0310 through EU0340 ....................................................................................................71

Permit Condition EU0310-001 through EU0340-001...........................................................71

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ........................................................................................................................ 71

Permit Condition EU0310-002 through EU0340-002...........................................................74

10 CSR 10-2.060........................................................................................................................................... 74

10 CSR 10-6.220........................................................................................................................................... 74

EU0350 through EU0360 ....................................................................................................75

Permit Condition EU0350-001 through EU0360-001...........................................................75

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ........................................................................................................................ 75

Permit Condition EU0350-002 through EU0360-002...........................................................77

10 CSR 10-2.060........................................................................................................................................... 77

10 CSR 10-6.220........................................................................................................................................... 77

Permit Condition EU0350-003 through EU00360-003.........................................................78

10 CSR 10-2.030........................................................................................................................................... 78

EU0370 through EU0380 ....................................................................................................78

Permit Condition EU0370-001 through EU0380-001...........................................................78

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ........................................................................................................................ 78

Permit Condition EU0370-002 through EU0380-002...........................................................81

10 CSR 10-2.030........................................................................................................................................... 81

Permit Condition EU0370-003 through EU0380-003...........................................................82

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ........................................................................................................................ 82
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 5

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0370-004 through EU0380-004...........................................................84

10 CSR 10-2.060........................................................................................................................................... 84

10 CSR 10-6.220........................................................................................................................................... 84

Permit Condition EU0370-005 through EU0380-005...........................................................85

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ........................................................................................................................ 85

Permit Condition EU0370-006 through EU0380-006...........................................................88

10 CSR 10-6.060........................................................................................................................................... 88

Construction Permit No. 0891-005A.............................................................................................................. 88

Permit Condition EU0370-007 through EU0380-007...........................................................89

10 CSR 10-6.260........................................................................................................................................... 89

EU0390 through EU0400 ....................................................................................................90

Permit Condition EU0390-001 through EU0400-001...........................................................90

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ........................................................................................................................ 90

Permit Condition EU0390-002 through EU0400-002...........................................................92

10 CSR 10-2.030........................................................................................................................................... 92

Permit Condition EU0390-003 through EU0400-003...........................................................93

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ........................................................................................................................ 93

Permit Condition EU0390-004 through EU0400-004...........................................................95

10 CSR 10-2.060........................................................................................................................................... 95

10 CSR 10-6.220........................................................................................................................................... 95

EU0410 through EU0470 ....................................................................................................96

Permit Condition EU0410-001 through EU0470-001...........................................................96

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ........................................................................................................................ 96

Permit Condition EU0410-002 through EU0470-002...........................................................98

10 CSR 10-2.060........................................................................................................................................... 98

10 CSR 10-6.220........................................................................................................................................... 98

Permit Condition EU0410-003 through EU0470-003...........................................................99

10 CSR 10-2.030........................................................................................................................................... 99

EU0480 through EU0490 ....................................................................................................99

Permit Condition EU0480-001 through EU0490-001...........................................................99

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ........................................................................................................................ 99

Permit Condition EU0480-002 through EU0490-002.........................................................101

10 CSR 10-2.060......................................................................................................................................... 101

10 CSR 10-6.220......................................................................................................................................... 101

Permit Condition EU0480-003 through EU0490-003.........................................................102

10 CSR 10-2.030......................................................................................................................................... 102

EU0500 through EU0510 ..................................................................................................103

Permit Condition EU0500-001 through EU0510-001.........................................................103

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ...................................................................................................................... 103

Permit Condition EU0500-002 through EU0510-002.........................................................105

10 CSR 10-2.060......................................................................................................................................... 105

10 CSR 10-6.220......................................................................................................................................... 105

Permit Condition EU0500-003 through EU0510-003.........................................................106

10 CSR 10-2.030......................................................................................................................................... 106

EU0520 through EU0530 ..................................................................................................107

Permit Condition EU0520-001 through EU0540-001.........................................................107

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ...................................................................................................................... 107

Permit Condition EU0520-002 through EU0540-002.........................................................109

10 CSR 10-2.060......................................................................................................................................... 109

10 CSR 10-6.220......................................................................................................................................... 109

Permit Condition EU0520-003 through EU0540-003.........................................................110

10 CSR 10-2.030......................................................................................................................................... 110

EU0550 through EU0560 ..................................................................................................111

Permit Condition EU0550-001 through EU0560-001.........................................................111

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ...................................................................................................................... 111
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 6

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0550-002 through EU0560-002.........................................................113

10 CSR 10-2.060......................................................................................................................................... 113

10 CSR 10-6.220......................................................................................................................................... 113

Permit Condition EU0550-003 through EU0560-003.........................................................114

10 CSR 10-2.030......................................................................................................................................... 114

EU0570 through EU0580 ..................................................................................................115

Permit Condition EU0570-001 through EU0580-001.........................................................115

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ...................................................................................................................... 115

Permit Condition EU0570-002 through EU0580-002.........................................................117

10 CSR 10-2.060......................................................................................................................................... 117

10 CSR 10-6.220......................................................................................................................................... 117

Permit Condition EU0570-003 through EU0580-003.........................................................118

10 CSR 10-2.030......................................................................................................................................... 118

EU0590 through EU0600 ..................................................................................................119

Permit Condition EU0590-001 through EU0600-001.........................................................119

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ...................................................................................................................... 119

Permit Condition EU0590-002 through EU0600-002.........................................................121

10 CSR 10-2.060......................................................................................................................................... 121

10 CSR 10-6.220......................................................................................................................................... 121

Permit Condition EU0590-003 through EU0600-003.........................................................122

10 CSR 10-2.030......................................................................................................................................... 122

EU0610 through EU0690 ..................................................................................................123

Permit Condition EU0610-001 through EU0690-001.........................................................123

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL ...................................................................................................................... 123

Permit Condition EU0610-002 through EU0690-002.........................................................125

10 CSR 10-2.060......................................................................................................................................... 125

10 CSR 10-6.220......................................................................................................................................... 125

Permit Condition EU0610-003 through EU0690-003.........................................................126

10 CSR 10-2.030......................................................................................................................................... 126

EU0700 .............................................................................................................................126

Permit Condition EU0700-001 ...........................................................................................126

10 CSR 10-6.070......................................................................................................................................... 126

40 CFR Part 60 Subpart Kb......................................................................................................................... 126

EU0710 .............................................................................................................................127

Permit Condition EU0710-001 ...........................................................................................127

10 CSR 10-2.260......................................................................................................................................... 127

EU0720 .............................................................................................................................128

Permit Condition EU0720-001 ...........................................................................................128

10 CSR 10-6.070......................................................................................................................................... 128

40 CFR Part 60 Subpart Kb......................................................................................................................... 128

EU0730 .............................................................................................................................129

Permit Condition EU0730-001 ...........................................................................................129

10 CSR 10-2.210......................................................................................................................................... 129

IV. CORE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS .............................................................................130

V. GENERAL PERMIT REQUIREMENTS ........................................................................133

Permit Duration ......................................................................................................................133

General Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements .............................................................133

Risk Management Plans Under Section 112(r) .........................................................................134

Severability Clause..................................................................................................................134

General Requirements.............................................................................................................134

Incentive Programs Not Requiring Permit Revisions.................................................................135

Title VI.....................................................................................................................................135
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 7

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Compliance Requirements.......................................................................................................136

Permit Shield...........................................................................................................................137

Emergency Provisions..............................................................................................................137

Operational Flexibility .............................................................................................................138

Off-Permit Changes .................................................................................................................138

Responsible Official .................................................................................................................139

Statement of Basis ..................................................................................................................139

Attachment A.............................................................................................................................................. 140

Attachment B.............................................................................................................................................. 141
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 8

Project No. 2240-0030-014

I. Installation Description and Equipment Listing

INSTALLATION DESCRIPTION

Lafarge Corporation operates a limestone quarry and Portland cement plant in Sugar

Creek, Missouri. The plant produces portland cement. Quarrying and cement

manufacturing has occurred at this location since approximately 1905.

EMISSION UNITS WITH LIMITATIONS

The following list provides a description of the equipment at this installation which emit air

pollutants and which are identified as having unit-specific emission limitations.

Emission Unit # Description of Emission Unit

EU0010 Primary Crusher

EU0020 Primary Crusher to Secondary Crusher Conveyor (#1 Belt)

EU0030 Post Secondary Screen

EU0040 Silo Conveyor (#3 Belt)

EU0050 #1 Belt Unloading to Secondary Crusher

EU0060 Secondary Crusher

EU0070 Screen Conveyor (#2 Belt)

EU0080 Rock/Clay Silo (#3 Belt Unloading to Silo)

EU0090 Alternate Raw Material Silo

EU0100 Mill Scale & Gypsum Unloading Station

EU0110 Mill Scale Silo (Conveyor Transfer Point)

EU0120 Alternate Raw Material Transfer Station

EU0130 Mill Feed Silo Building

EU0140 Raw Mill #1 – Conveyor (to feed belt)

EU0150 Raw Mill #1 – Feed Belt

EU0160 Raw Mill #1 – Weigh Hopper

EU0170 Raw Mill #1 – Grinder

EU0180 Raw Mill #1 – Air Separator

EU0190 Raw Mill #1 – Unloading (Airslide to Raw Mix Pumps)

EU0200 Raw Mill #1 – 10 MMBtu/hr Natural Gas Fired Dryer

EU0210 Raw Mill #2 – Conveyor (to feed belt)

EU0220 Raw Mill #2 – Feed Belt

EU0230 Raw Mill #2 – Weigh Hopper

EU0240 Raw Mill #2 – Grinder

EU0250 Raw Mill #2 – Air Separator

EU0260 Raw Mill #2 – Unloading (Airslide to Raw Mix Pumps)

EU0270 Raw Mill #2 – 10 MMBtu/hr Natural Gas Fired Dryer

EU0280 Blend Silos (Raw Mix Unloading to Blend Silos)

EU0290 Blend Conveyor (Raw Mix Transfer to Kiln Feed Leveling Box)

EU0300 Kiln Feed Leveling Box (Raw Mix Unloading to Kiln Feed Leveling

Box)

EU0310 Coal/Coke Unloader/Transfer Conveyor

EU0320 Fuel Grinding Mills
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 9

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Emission Unit # Description of Emission Unit

EU0330 Transfer Conveyor Unloading to Fuel Hopper

EU0340 Fuel Silos (Fuel Hopper Unloading to Fuel Silo Conveyor)

EU0350 Coal Silo (Coal Unloading from Conveyor to Silos)

EU0360 Coke/Non Hazardous Waste Fuel Substitute Silo (Unloading from

Conveyor to Silos)

EU0370 Rotary Cement Kiln #1

EU0380 Rotary Cement Kiln #2

EU0390 Clinker Cooler #1

EU0400 Clinker Cooler #2

EU0410 Clinker Roll Crusher

EU0420 Clinker Reclaim & Transfer Station (Unloading Mine or Purchased

Clinker to Silo)

EU0430 Clinker Transfer from Roll Crusher to Silos (#7 Belt)

EU0440 Clinker Silos (Clinker Unloading to Silos)

EU0450 Clinker Loadout Station #1 (Clinker Unloading from Silos to Truck)

EU0460 Clinker Loadout Station #2 (Clinker Unloading from Silos to Truck)

EU0470 Gypsum Silos (Transfer Conveyor Unloading to Gypsum Silos)

EU0480 Finish Mill #1 Feed Belt

EU0490 Finish Mill #1 Weigh Hopper

EU0500 Finish Mill #1 Grinder

EU0510 Finish Mill #1 Cement Air Separator

EU0520 Finish Mill #2 Feed Belt

EU0530 Finish Mill #2 Weigh Hopper

EU0540 Finish Mill Fringe Tank

EU0550 Finish Mill #2 Grinder

EU0560 Finish Mill #2 Cement Air Separator

EU0570 Finish Mill #3 Feed Belt (Belt 12A)

EU0580 Finish Mill #3 Weigh Hopper

EU0590 Finish Mill #3 Grinder

EU0600 Finish Mill #3 Cement Air Separator

EU0610 Cement Storage Silos Transfer Point (Cement Transfer to Storage

Silos)

EU0620 Pneumatic Cement Conveyor #1

EU0630 Pneumatic Cement Conveyor #2

EU0640 Cement Unloading Silos - Truck #1

EU0650 Cement Unloading Silos – Truck #2

EU0660 Barge Loadout Station

EU0670 Railcar Loadout Station

EU0680 Truck Loadout Station #1

EU0690 Truck Loadout Station #2

EU0700 50,300 Gallon Ethanolamine Fixed Roof Storage Tank

EU0710 8,000 Gallon Gasoline RVP-13 Underground Storage Tank

EU0720 12,000 Gallon #2 Fuel (Diesel) Oil Underground Storage Tank

EU0730 Safety-Kleen Parts Washers (Degreasing Units)
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 10

Project No. 2240-0030-014

EMISSION UNITS WITHOUT LIMITATIONS

The following list provides a description of the equipment that does not have unit specific

limitations at the time of permit issuance.

Description of Emission Source 

Quarry (EP-1, 1998 EIQ) - Top Soil Removal, Hauling, Stockpile, Loading /Unloading;

Drilling & Blasting;

Shale Removal, Hauling, Stockpile, Loading /Unloading; and

Rock Removal, Hauling, Stockpile Loading/Unloading

Sewage Treatment Plant (EP-0, 1998 EIQ)

Clay Stockpile (EP-2, 1998 EIQ)

Primary Crusher (EP-3, 1998 EIQ) – Rock/Clay Unloading to Primary Crusher

Paved Roads (EP-49, 1998 EIQ)

Unpaved Roads (EP-50, 1998 EIQ)

Two (2) 1.33 MMBtu/hr Each Natural Gas Fired Boilers (EP54 & EP-55, 1998 EIQ)

Raw Material and Coal/Coke Stockpiles

Laboratory Fume Hoods (EP-56, 1998 EIQ)

20 Natural Gas Fired Space Heaters (0.5 MMBtu/hr each)

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

These documents have been incorporated by reference into this permit.

1) Permit to Construct, Permit No. 0991-005A
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 11

Project No. 2240-0030-014

II. Plant Wide Emission Limitations

The installation shall comply with each of the following emission limitations. Consult the

appropriate sections in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and Code of State

Regulations (CSR) for the full text of the applicable requirements.

Permit Condition PW001

10 CSR 10-6.170

Restriction of Particulate Matter to the Ambient Air Beyond the Premises of Origin

Emission Limitation:

No person may cause or allow to occur any handling, transporting or storing of any material;

construction, repair, cleaning or demolition of a building or its appurtenances; construction or

use of a road, driveway or open area; or operation of a commercial or industrial installation

without applying reasonable measures as may be required to prevent, or in a manner which

allows or may allow, fugitive particulate matter to go beyond the premises of origin in quantities

that the particulate matter:

• Remains visible in the ambient air beyond the property line of origin; or

• May be found on surfaces beyond the property line of origin.

The nature or origin of the particulate matter shall be determined by microscopy or other

technique proven to be equally accurate and approved by the Director.

Monitoring:

The permittee shall conduct inspections of its facilities sufficient to determine compliance with

this regulation. If a violation of this regulation is discovered, the source shall undertake

corrective action to eliminate the violation.

The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks after

permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period then-

• Observations must be made once every two weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a

violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be

observed during this period then-

• Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to

weekly.

If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in an

identical manner to the initial monitoring frequency.

Record Keeping:

A log must be maintained noting the following:

• Whether air emissions (except water vapor) remain visible in the ambient air beyond the

property line of origin.

• Whether the visible emissions were normal for the installation.

• Equipment malfunctions that could cause an exceedance of 10 CSR 10-6.170.

• Any violations of 10 CSR 10-6.170 and any corrective actions undertaken to correct the

violation.

Attachment A contains a log including these record keeping requirements. This log, or an

equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify compliance with this requirement.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than 10 days after any exceedance of any of the terms

imposed by this regulation, or any malfunction which could possibly cause an exceedance of

this regulation.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 12

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition PW002

10 CSR 10-6.250

Asbestos Abatement Projects – Certification, Accreditation, and Business Exemption

Requirements

Emission Limitation:

The permittee shall conduct all asbestos abatement projects within the procedures established

for certification and accreditation by 10 CSR 10-6.250.

• An individual must receive certification from the department before that individual

participates in an asbestos abatement project operating in Missouri according to Section (3).

This certification is annually renewable. Certification as an AHERA inspector, AHERA

management planner and AHERA project designer apply to AHERA-related projects.

• To be a training provider for the purpose of this rule a school shall apply for accreditation to

the department and comply with the United States Environmental Protection Agency AHERA

Model Accreditation plan 40 CFR part 763 Appendix C, subpart E. Details of the

requirements for accreditation are found in Section (4).

Monitoring:

Any appropriate monitoring to demonstrate compliance with Certification and Accreditation

standards.

Record Keeping:

Any appropriate record keeping to demonstrate compliance with Certification and Accreditation

standards.

Reporting:

Any appropriate reporting to demonstrate compliance with Certification and Accreditation

standards.

Permit Condition PW003

10 CSR 10-6.080

Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants

40 CFR Part 61 Subpart M

National Emission Standard for Asbestos

Emission Limitation:

The permittee shall follow the procedures and requirements of 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M for

any activities occurring at this installation which would be subject to provisions for 40 CFR Part

61, Subpart M, National Emission Standard for Asbestos.

Monitoring:

Any appropriate monitoring to demonstrate compliance with registration, certification,

notification, and Abatement Procedures and Practices standards as specified in 40 CFR Part 61,

Subpart M.

Record Keeping:

Any appropriate record keeping as specified in 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M.

Reporting:

Any appropriate reporting as specified in 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 13

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition PW004

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction Plan §63.1354(b)(4) and (b)(5)

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A

General Provisions – Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction Plan §63.6(e)(3)

Emission Limitation:

The owner or operator of an affected source shall develop and implement a written startup,

shutdown, and malfunction plan that describes, in detail, procedures for operating and

maintaining the source during periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction and a program

of corrective action for malfunctioning process and air pollution control equipment used to

comply with the relevant standard. As required under §63.8(c)(1)(i), the plan shall identify all

routine or otherwise predictable continuous monitoring system (CMS) malfunctions. This plan

shall be developed by the owner or operator by the source’s compliance date for that relevant

standard. The plan shall be incorporated by reference into the source’s title V permit. The

purpose of the startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan is to:

• Ensure that, at all times, owners or operators operate and maintain affected sources

including associated air pollution control equipment, in a manner consistent with good air

pollution control practices for minimizing emissions at least to the levels required by all

relevant standards;

• Ensure that owners or operators are prepared to correct malfunctions as soon as

practicable after their occurrence in order to minimize excess emissions of hazardous air

pollutants; and

• Reduce the reporting burden associated with periods of startup, shutdown, and

malfunction (including corrective action taken to restore malfunctioning process and air

pollution control equipment to its normal or usual manner of operation). (§63.6(e)(3)(i))

Monitoring:

During periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction, the owner or operator of an affected

source shall operate and maintain such source (including associated air pollution control

equipment) in accordance with the procedures specified in the startup, shutdown, and

malfunction plan developed under paragraph (e)(3)(i) of this section. (§63.6(e)(3)(ii))

Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall keep a copy of the startup, shutdown, malfunction plan on-site at all

times. The plan shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of

Natural Resources personnel upon request.

• When actions taken by the owner or operator during a startup, shutdown, or malfunction

(including actions taken to correct a malfunction) are consistent with the procedures

specified in the startup, shutdown and malfunction plan, the owner or operator shall keep

records for that event that demonstrate the procedures specified in the plan were followed.

These records may take the form of a “checklist,” or other effective form of record keeping,

that confirms conformance with the startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan for that

event. In addition the owner or operator shall keep records of these events as specified in

§63.10(b) (and elsewhere in this part), including records of the occurrence and duration of

each startup, shutdown, or malfunction operation and each malfunction of the air pollution

control equipment. (§63.6(e)(3)(iii))

• If an action taken by the owner or operator during a startup, shutdown, or malfunction

(including an action taken to correct a malfunction) is not consistent with the procedures
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 14

Project No. 2240-0030-014

specified in the startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan, the owner or operator shall

record the actions taken for that event. ((§63.6(e)(3)(iv))

Reporting:

• As required by §63.10(d)(5), if actions taken by an owner or operator during a startup,

shutdown, or malfunction of an affected source (including actions taken to correct a

malfunction) are consistent with the procedures specified in the source’s startup,

shutdown, and malfunction plan specified in §63.6(e)(3), the owner or operator shall state

such information in a semiannual report. Reports shall only be required if a startup,

shutdown, or malfunction occurred during the reporting period. The startup, shutdown,

and malfunction report may be submitted simultaneously with the excess emissions and

continuous monitoring system performance reports; and (§63.1354(b)(4))

• Any time an action taken by an owner or operator during a startup, shutdown, or

malfunction (including actions taken to correct a malfunction) is not consistent with the

procedures in the startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan, the owner or operator shall

make an immediate report of the actions taken for that event within 2 working days, by

telephone call or facsimile (FAX) transmission. The immediate report shall be followed by a

letter, certified by the owner or operator or other responsible official, explaining the

circumstances of the event, the reasons for not following the startup, shutdown, and

malfunction plan, and whether any excess emissions and/or parameter monitoring

exceedances are believed to have occurred. (§63.1354(b)(5))

The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to

the provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 15

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition PW005

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Operations and Maintenance Plan §63.1350(a) and (b)

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A

General Provisions – Operation and Maintenance Requirements §63.6(e)(1) and (2)

Emission Limitation:

• The owner or operator of each portland cement plant shall prepare for each affected source

subject to the provisions of this subpart, a written operations and maintenance plan. The

plan shall include the following information:

(1) Procedures for proper operation and maintenance of the affected source and air

pollution control devices in order to meet the emission limits and operating limits of

§§63.1343 through 63.1348;

(2) Corrective actions to be taken when required by paragraph (e) of this section;

(3) Procedures to be used during an inspection of the components of the combustion

system of each kiln and each in-line kiln raw mill located at the facility at least once per

year; and

(4) Procedures to be used to periodically monitor affected sources subject to opacity

standards under §§63.1346 and 63.1348. Such procedures must include the provisions

of paragraphs (a)(4)(i) through (a)(4)(iv) of this section.

(i) The owner or operator must conduct a monthly 1-minute visible emissions test of

each affected source in accordance with Method 22 of Appendix A to part 60 of

this chapter. The test must be conducted while the affected source is in

operation.

(ii) If no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests for any

affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from

monthly to semi-annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are

observed during any semi-annual test, the owner or operator must resume

testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule

until no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests.

(iii) If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected

source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semiannually to annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed

during any annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that

affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible

emission are observed in six consecutive monthly test.

(iv) If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or

operator must conduct a 6-minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of

appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The Method 9 test must begin within one

hour of any observation of visible emissions. (§63.1350(a))

• Failure to comply with any provision of the operations and maintenance plan developed in

accordance with paragraph (a) of this section shall be a violation of the standard.

(§63.1350(b))

• Operation and maintenance requirements established pursuant to section 112 of the Act

are enforceable independent of emissions limitations or other requirements in relevant

standards. (§63.6(e)(1)(iii))
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 16

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Monitoring:

• At all times, including periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction, owners or operators

shall operate and maintain any affected source, including associated air pollution control

equipment, in a manner consistent with good air pollution control practices for minimizing

emissions at least to the levels required by all relevant standards. (§63.6(e)(1)(i))

• Malfunctions shall be corrected as soon as practicable after their occurrence in accordance

with the startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan required in §63.6(e)(3) of this section.

(§63.6(e)(1)(ii))

Record Keeping:

As specified in the Operations and Maintenance Plan.

Reporting:

• The plan shall be submitted to the Administrator for review and approval as part of the

application for a part 70 permit. (§63.1350(a))

• All failures to comply with any provision of the operation and maintenance plan developed

in accordance with §63.1350(a) shall be included in the semiannual summary report.

(§63.1354(b)(9)(v))

The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the

provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]

Permit Condition PW006

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Notification Requirements §63.1353, Reporting Requirements

§63.1354(a) and Record keeping Requirements §63.1355(a) and (b)

Emission Limitation:

• The notification provisions of 40 CFR part 63, subpart A that apply and those that do not

apply to owners and operators of affected sources subject to this subpart are listed in Table 1

of this subpart. If any State requires a notice that contains all of the information required in

a notification listed in this section, the owner or operator may send the Administrator a copy

of the notice sent to the State to satisfy the requirements of this section for that notification.

• Each owner or operator subject to the requirements of this subpart shall comply with the

notification requirements in §63.9 as listed below.

Monitoring:

None

Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and

notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for

inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five

years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action,

report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be retained on site.

The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may be maintained on

microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche.

• The owner or operators shall maintain records for each affected source as required by

§63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3) of this part; and

(1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status

under §63.9;

(2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and

(3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information

demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record

keeping or reporting requirements
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 17

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Reporting:

• Initial notifications as required by §63.9(b) through (d). For the purposes of this subpart, a

Title V or 40 CFR part 70 permit application may be used in lieu of the initial notification

required under §63.9(b), provided the same information is contained in the permit

application as required by §63.9(b), and the State to which the permit application has been

submitted has an approved operating permit program under part 70 of this chapter and

has received delegation of authority from the EPA. Permit applications shall be submitted

by the same due dates as those specified for the initial notification.

• Notification of performance tests, as required by §§63.7 and 63.9(e).

• Notification of opacity and visible emission observations required by §63.1349 in

accordance with §§63.6(h)(5) and 63.9(f).

• Notification, as required by §63.9(g), of the date that the continuous emission monitor

performance evaluation required by §63.8(e) is scheduled to begin.

• Notification of compliance status, as required by §63.9(h).

• The reporting provisions of subpart A of this part that apply and those that do not apply to

owners or operators of affected sources subject to this subpart are listed in Table 1 of this

subpart. If any State requires a report that contains all of the information required in a

report listed in this section, the owner or operator may send the Administrator a copy of the

report sent to the State to satisfy the requirements of this section for that report.

(§63.1354(a))

• As required by §63.10(d)(4), the owner or operator of an affected source who is required to

submit progress reports as a condition of receiving an extension of compliance under

§63.6(i) shall submit such reports by the dates specified in the written extension of

compliance. (§63.1354(b)(3))

• The owner or operator shall submit a summary report semiannually which contains the

information specified in §63.10(e)(3)(vi). In addition, the summary report shall include

(§63.1354(b)(9):

(1) All exceedences of maximum control device inlet gas temperature limits specified in

§63.1344(a) and (b); (§63.1354(b)(9)(i)

(2) All failures to calibrate thermocouples and other temperature sensors as required under

§63.1350(f)(7); and (§63.1354(b)(9)(ii))

(3) All failures to maintain the activated carbon injection rate, and the activated carbon

injection carrier gas flow rate or pressure drop, as applicable, as required under

§63.1344(c). (§63.1354(b)(9)(iii)

(4) The results of any combustion system component inspections conducted within the

reporting period as required under §63.1350(i). (§63.1354(b)(9)(iv))

(5) All failures to comply with any provision of the operation and maintenance plan

developed in accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1354(b)(9)(v))
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 18

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition PW007

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Performance Testing Requirements §63.1349

Emission Limitation:

The owner or operator of any affected source subject to this subpart shall demonstrate initial

compliance with the emission limits of §63.1343 and §63.1345 through §63.1348 using the

test methods and procedures in §63.1349(b) and §63.7. (§63.1349(a))

Performance Testing:

Performance tests to demonstrate initial compliance with this subpart shall be conducted as

specified in §63.1349(b)(1) through §63.1349(b)(4). (§63.1349(b))

Monitoring:

As required by the test methods and procedures in §63.1349(b) and §63.7.

Record Keeping:

As required by the test methods and procedures in §63.1349(b) and §63.7

Reporting:

• Performance test results shall be documented in complete test reports that contain the

information required by §63.1349(a)(1) through (a)(10) of this section, as well as all other

relevant information. The plan to be followed during testing shall be made available to the

Administrator prior to testing, if requested. (§63.1349(a))

• A brief description of the process and the air pollution control system; (§63.1349(a)(1))

• Sampling location description(s); (§63.1349(a)(2))

• A description of sampling and analytical procedures and any modification to standard

procedures; (§63.1349(a)(3))

• Test results; (§63.1349(a)(4))

• Quality assurance procedures and results; (§63.1349(a)(5))

• Records of operating conditions during the test, preparation of standards, and calibration

procedures; (§63.1349(a)(6))

• Raw data sheets for field sampling and field and laboratory analyses; (§63.1349(a)(7))

• Documentation of calculation; (§63.1349(a)(8))

• All data recorded and used to establish parameters for compliance monitoring; and

(§63.1349(a)(9))

• Any other information required by the test method. (§63.1349(a)(10))

The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the

provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 19

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition PW008

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Alternate Monitoring Requirements §63.1350

Emission Limitation:

• An owner or operator may submit an application to the Administrator for approval of

alternate monitoring requirements to demonstrate compliance with the emission standards

of this subpart, except for emission standards for THC, subject to the provisions of

§63.1350(l)(1) through (l)(6). (§63.1350(l))

• The Administrator may decide at any time, on a case-by-case basis that additional or

alternative operating limits, or alternative approaches to establishing operating limits, are

necessary to demonstrate compliance with the emission standards of this subpart.

(§63.1350(l)(6))

Monitoring:

If the application to use an alternate monitoring requirement is approved, the owner or

operator must continue to use the original monitoring requirement until approval is received to

use another monitoring requirement. (§63.1350(l)(2))

Record Keeping:

If the application to use an alternate monitoring requirement is approved, the owner or

operator must continue to use the original record keeping requirements for the original

monitoring requirements until approval is received to use another monitoring requirement.

Reporting:

• The Administrator will not approve averaging periods other than those specified in this

section, unless the owner or operator documents, using data or information, that the longer

averaging period will ensure that emissions do not exceed levels achieved during the

performance test over any increment of time equivalent to the time required to conduct

three runs of the performance test. (§63.1350(l)(1))

• The owner or operator shall submit the application for approval of alternate monitoring

requirements no later than the notification of performance test. The application must

contain the information specified in §63.1350(l)(3)(i) through (l)(3)(iii): (§63.1350(l)(3)

(1) Data or information justifying the request, such as the technical or economic

infeasibility, or the impracticality of using the required approach. (§63.1350(l)(3)(i))

(2) A description of the proposed alternative monitoring requirement, including the

operating parameter to be monitored, the monitoring approach and technique, the

averaging period for the limit, and how the limit is to be calculated; and

(§63.1350(l)(3)(ii))

(3) Data or information documenting that the alternative monitoring requirement would

provide equivalent or better assurance of compliance with the relevant emission

standard. (§63.1350(l)(3)(iii)

• The Administrator will notify the owner or operator of the approval or denial of the

application within 90 calendar days after receipt of the original request, or within 60

calendar days of the receipt of any supplementary information, whichever is later. The

Administrator will not approve an alternate monitoring application unless it would provide

equivalent or better assurance of compliance with the relevant emission standard. Before

disapproving any alternate monitoring application, the Administrator will provide

(§63.1350(l)(4)):
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 20

Project No. 2240-0030-014

(1) Notice of the information and findings upon which the intended disapproval is based;

and (§63.1350(l)(4)(i))

(2) Notice of opportunity for the owner or operator to present additional supporting

information before final action is taken on the application. This notice will specify how

much additional time is allowed for the owner or operator to provide additional

supporting information. (§63.1350(l)(4)(ii))

• The owner or operator is responsible for submitting any supporting information in a timely

manner to enable the Administrator to consider the application prior to the performance

test. Neither submittal of an application, nor the Administrator’s failure to approve or

disapprove the application relieves the owner or operator of the responsibility to comply

with any provision of this subpart. (§63.1350(l)(5))

The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the

provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 21

Project No. 2240-0030-014

III. Emission Unit Specific Emission Limitations

The installation shall comply with each of the following emission limitations. Consult the

appropriate sections in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and Code of State

Regulations (CSR) for the full text of the applicable requirements.

EU0010 through EU0040

EU0010 – Primary Crusher

EU0020 – Primary Crusher to Secondary Crusher Conveyor (#1 Belt)

EU0030 – Post Secondary Screen

EU0040 – Silo Conveyor (#3 Belt)

General Description: Primary Crushing System (including crusher, conveyors and screen).

Installed: 1952.

Control Device: Enclosure

Manufacturer/Model #: Taylor

EIQ Reference # (Year): EP-4 (1998)

Permit Condition EU0010-001 through EU0040-001

10 CSR 10-2.060

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any

source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions

for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible

emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity.

Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures

contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is

operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions

are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For

emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity

standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks

after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this

period, then:

2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a

violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be

observed during this period, then:

3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to

weekly.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 22

Project No. 2240-0030-014

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in

an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA

Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer.

Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting:

1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units,

2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and

3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any

other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit

established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and

the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is

incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.

EU0050 Through EU0070

EU0050 – #1 Belt Unloading to Secondary Crusher

EU0060 – Secondary Crusher

EU0070 – Screen Conveyor (#2 Belt)

General Description: Secondary Crushing System (including unloader, crusher and

conveyor).

Installed: 1952.

Control Device: EU0050 & EU0070 -Enclosure; EU0060 – Fabric Filter

Baghouse

Manufacturer/Model #: Pennsylvania

EIQ Reference # (Year): EP-5 (1998)

General Description: Rock/Clay Silos, Conveyors and Loading/Unloading

Installed: 1952-1954.

Control Device: Enclosure

Manufacturer/Model #:

EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-6

Permit Condition EU0050-001 through EU0070-001

10 CSR 10-2.060

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 23

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Emission Limitation:

No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any

source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions

for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible

emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity.

Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures

contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is

operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions

are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For

emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity

standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks

after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this

period, then:

2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a

violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be

observed during this period, then:

3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to

weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in

an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA

Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer.

Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting:

1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units,

2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and

3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any

other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit

established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and

the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is

incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 24

Project No. 2240-0030-014

EU0080

Rock/Clay Silo (#3 Belt Unloading to Silo)

General Description: Rock/Clay Silo, Conveyors and Loading/Unloading

Installed: 1952-1954.

Control Device: Enclosure

Manufacturer/Model #:

EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-6

Permit Condition EU0080-001

10 CSR 10-2.060

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any

source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions

for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible

emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity.

Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures

contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is

operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions

are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For

emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity

standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks

after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this

period, then:

2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a

violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be

observed during this period, then:

3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to

weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in

an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA

Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer.

Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting:

1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units,

2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and

3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 25

Project No. 2240-0030-014

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any

other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit

established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and

the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is

incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.

Permit Condition EU0080-002

10 CSR 10-2.030

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation:

The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of 63 lbs/hr from this emission unit.

Monitoring:

None

Record Keeping:

None

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 26

Project No. 2240-0030-014

EU0090

Alternate Raw Material Silos

General Description: Alternate Raw Material Silos and Conveyors

Installed: 1952-1954

Control Device: Baghouse

Manufacturer/Model #:

EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-7

Permit Condition EU0090-001

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation:

The owner or operator shall not cause to be discharged any gases from the catalyst/nonhazardous waste silos, conveying system transfer point; and bulk loading or unloading system

which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent. (§63.1348)

Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the raw material storage

bin; conveying system transfer point; and bulk loading or unloading system opacity limit by

conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter.

The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when the raw

material storage bin; conveying system transfer point; and bulk loading or unloading

system is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The

maximum six-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to

determine whether the raw material storage bin; conveying system transfer point; and bulk

loading or unloading system is in initial compliance with the standard. The duration of the

Method 9 performance test shall be 3-hours (30 6-minute averages), except that the

duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to 1-hour if the conditions of

§63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)):

(1) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i));

(2) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent for the first 1-hour period.

(§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five years.

(§63.1349(c))

Monitoring:

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall

monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in

accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly 1-minute visible emissions test of each

affected source in accordance with Method 22 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The

test must be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests for any affected source,

the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semi-annually

for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual test, the
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 27

Project No. 2240-0030-014

owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and

maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the

owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for

that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or

operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that

schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests.

(§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must

conduct a 6-minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of

this chapter. The Method 9 test must begin within one hour of any observation of visible

emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv))

Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and

notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for

inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least

five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective

action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be

retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may

be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on

microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by

§63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b))

(1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status

under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1))

(2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and

(§63.1355(b)(2))

(3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information

demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record

keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

Reporting:

As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity

results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2))

The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the

provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 28

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0090-002

10 CSR 10-2.060

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any

source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions

for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible

emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity.

Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures

contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is

operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions

are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For

emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity

standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks

after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this

period, then:

2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a

violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be

observed during this period, then:

3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to

weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in

an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA

Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer.

Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting:

1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units,

2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and

3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any

other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit

established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement.

The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are

federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as

a final EPA action.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 29

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0090-003

10 CSR 10-2.030

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation:

The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of 30.5 lbs/hr from each Silo (catalyst

and non-hazardous waste silos) transfer point.

Monitoring:

None

Record Keeping:

None

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO

65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.

EU0100

Mill Scale & Gypsum Unloading Station

General Description: Mill Scale & Gypsum Unloading Station

Installed: 1952-1954

Control Device: None (Fugitive)

Manufacturer/Model #:

EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-8

Permit Condition EU0100-001

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation:

The owner or operator shall not cause to be discharged any gases from the mill scale and

gypsum unloading station which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent. (§63.1348)

Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the mill scale and gypsum

unloading station opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of

appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The performance test shall be conducted under the

conditions that exist when the mill scale and gypsum unloading station is operating at the

highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The maximum six-minute

average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to determine whether the mill

scale and gypsum unloading station is in initial compliance with the standard. The

duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be 3-hours (30 6-minute averages), except

that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to 1-hour if the

conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)):

(1) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i));
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 30

Project No. 2240-0030-014

(2) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent for the first 1-hour period.

(§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five years.

(§63.1349(c))

Monitoring:

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall

monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in

accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly 1-minute visible emissions test of each

affected source in accordance with Method 22 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The

test must be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests for any affected source,

the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semi-annually

for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual test, the

owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and

maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the

owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for

that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or

operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that

schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests.

(§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must

conduct a 6-minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of

this chapter. The Method 9 test must begin within one hour of any observation of visible

emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv))

Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and

notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for

inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least

five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective

action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be

retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may

be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on

microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by

§63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b))

(1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status

under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1))

(2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and

(§63.1355(b)(2))

(3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information

demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record

keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

Reporting:

As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity

results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2))

The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the

provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 31

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0100-002

10 CSR 10-2.060

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any

source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions

for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible

emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity.

Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures

contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is

operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions

are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For

emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity

standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks

after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this

period, then:

2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a

violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be

observed during this period, then:

3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to

weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in

an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA

Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer.

Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting:

1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units,

2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and

3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any

other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit

established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and

the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is

incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 32

Project No. 2240-0030-014

EU0110

Mill Scale Silo

General Description: Mill Scale Silo Conveyor Transfer Point

Installed: 1952-1954

Control Device: Enclosure

Manufacturer/Model #:

EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-9

Permit Condition EU0110-001

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation:

The owner or operator shall not cause to be discharged any gases from the mill scale silo

conveyor transfer point which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent. (§63.1348)

Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the mill scale silo conveyor

transfer point opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A

to part 60 of this chapter. The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions

that exist when the mill scale silo conveyor transfer point is operating at the highest load or

capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The maximum six-minute average opacity

exhibited during the test period shall be used to determine whether the mill scale silo

conveyor transfer point is in initial compliance with the standard. The duration of the

Method 9 performance test shall be 3-hours (30 6-minute averages), except that the

duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to 1-hour if the conditions of

§63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)):

(1) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i));

(2) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent for the first 1-hour period.

(§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five years.

(§63.1349(c))

Monitoring:

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall

monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in

accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly 1-minute visible emissions test of each

affected source in accordance with Method 22 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The

test must be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests for any affected source,

the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semi-annually

for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual test, the

owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and

maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 33

Project No. 2240-0030-014

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the

owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for

that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or

operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that

schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests.

(§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must

conduct a 6-minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of

this chapter. The Method 9 test must begin within one hour of any observation of visible

emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv))

Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and

notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for

inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least

five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective

action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be

retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may

be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on

microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by

§63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b))

(1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status

under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1))

(2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and

(§63.1355(b)(2))

(3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information

demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record

keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

Reporting:

As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity

results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2))

The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the

provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 34

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0110-002

10 CSR 10-2.060

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any

source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions

for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible

emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity.

Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures

contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is

operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions

are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For

emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity

standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks

after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this

period, then:

2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a

violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be

observed during this period, then:

3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to

weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in

an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA

Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer.

Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting:

1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units,

2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and

3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any

other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit

established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire

and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is

incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 35

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0110-003

10 CSR 10-2.030

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation:

The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of 30.5 lbs/hr from the mill scale silo

conveyor transfer point

Monitoring:

None

Record Keeping:

None

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO

65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.

EU0120

Alternate Raw Material Transfer Station

General Description: Alternate Raw Material Transfer Station

Installed: 1952-1954

Control Device: Baghouse

Manufacturer/Model #:

EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-10

Permit Condition EU0120-001

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation:

The owner or operator shall not cause to be discharged any gases from the catalyst/nonhazardous waste transfer station which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent. (§63.1348)

Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the catalyst/non-hazardous

waste transfer station opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of

appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The performance test shall be conducted under the

conditions that exist when the catalyst/non-hazardous waste transfer station is operating at

the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The maximum six-minute

average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to determine whether the

catalyst/non-hazardous waste transfer station is in initial compliance with the standard.

The duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be 3-hours (30 6-minute averages),

except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to 1-hour if the

conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)):

(1) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i));

(2) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent for the first 1-hour period.

(§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five years.

(§63.1349(c))
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 36

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Monitoring:

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall

monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in

accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly 1-minute visible emissions test of each

affected source in accordance with Method 22 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The

test must be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests for any affected source,

the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semi-annually

for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual test, the

owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and

maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the

owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for

that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or

operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that

schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests.

(§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must

conduct a 6-minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of

this chapter. The Method 9 test must begin within one hour of any observation of visible

emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv))

Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and

notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for

inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least

five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective

action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be

retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may

be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on

microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by

§63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b))

(1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status

under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1))

(2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and

(§63.1355(b)(2))

(3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information

demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record

keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

Reporting:

As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity

results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2))

The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the

provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 37

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0120-002

10 CSR 10-2.060

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any

source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions

for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible

emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity.

Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures

contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is

operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions

are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For

emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity

standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks

after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this

period, then:

2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a

violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be

observed during this period, then:

3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to

weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in

an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA

Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer.

Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting:

1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units,

2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and

3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any

other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit

established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and

the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is

incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 38

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0120-003

10 CSR 10-2.030

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation:

The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of 1.25 lbs/hr and 12.63 lbs/hr from

catalyst and non hazardous waste transfer point, respectively.

Monitoring:

None

Record Keeping:

None

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO

65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 39

Project No. 2240-0030-014

EU0130

Mill Feed Silo Building

General Description: Mill Feed Silo Building (Mill Scale Conveyor Unloading to Silo)

Installed: 1952-1954

Control Device: Enclosure

Manufacturer/Model #:

EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-11

Permit Condition EU0130-001

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation:

The owner or operator shall not cause to be discharged any gases from the mill scale conveyor

transfer point which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent. (§63.1348)

Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the mill scale conveyor

transfer point opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A

to part 60 of this chapter. The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions

that exist when the mill scale conveyor transfer point is operating at the highest load or

capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The maximum six-minute average opacity

exhibited during the test period shall be used to determine whether the mill scale silo

conveyor transfer point is in initial compliance with the standard. The duration of the

Method 9 performance test shall be 3-hours (30 6-minute averages), except that the

duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to 1-hour if the conditions of

§63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)):

(1) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i));

(2) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent for the first 1-hour period.

(§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five years.

(§63.1349(c))

Monitoring:

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall

monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in

accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly 1-minute visible emissions test of each

affected source in accordance with Method 22 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The

test must be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests for any affected source,

the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semi-annually

for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual test, the

owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and

maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 40

Project No. 2240-0030-014

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the

owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for

that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or

operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that

schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests.

(§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must

conduct a 6-minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of

this chapter. The Method 9 test must begin within one hour of any observation of visible

emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv))

Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and

notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for

inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least

five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective

action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be

retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may

be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on

microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by

§63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b))

(1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status

under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1))

(2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and

(§63.1355(b)(2))

(3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information

demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record

keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

Reporting:

As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity

results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2))

The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the

provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 41

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0130-002

10 CSR 10-2.060

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any

source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions

for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible

emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity.

Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures

contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is

operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions

are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For

emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity

standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks

after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this

period, then:

2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a

violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be

observed during this period, then:

3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to

weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in

an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA

Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer.

Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting:

1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units,

2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and

3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any

other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit

established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and

the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is

incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 42

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0130-003

10 CSR 10-2.030

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation:

The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of 54.72 lbs/hr from the mill scale

conveyor transfer point

Monitoring:

None

Record Keeping:

None

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO

65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 43

Project No. 2240-0030-014

EU0140 through EU0160 and EU0190

EU0140 - Raw Mill #1 Conveyor (to feed belt)

EU0150 – Raw Mill #1 Feed Belt

EU0160 – Raw Mill #1 Weigh Hopper

EU0190 – Raw Mill #1 - Unloading (Airslide to Raw Mix Pumps)

General Description: Raw Material Milling Process Associated Equipment

Installed: 1954

Control Device: Baghouse

Manufacturer/Model #: Nordberg

EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-12

Permit Condition EU0140-001 through EU0160-001 and EU0190-001

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation:

The owner or operator shall not cause to be discharged any gases from these affected sources

which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent. (§63.1348)

Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with these affected sources

opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of

this chapter. The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist

when these affected sources are operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably

expected to occur. The maximum six-minute average opacity exhibited during the test

period shall be used to determine whether these affected sources are in initial compliance

with the standard. The duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be 3-hours (30 6-

minute averages), except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be

reduced to 1-hour if the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply

(§63.1349(b)(2)):

(1) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i));

(2) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent for the first 1-hour period.

(§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five years.

(§63.1349(c))

Monitoring:

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall

monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in

accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly 1-minute visible emissions test of each

affected source in accordance with Method 22 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The

test must be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests for any affected source,

the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semi-annually

for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual test, the
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 44

Project No. 2240-0030-014

owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and

maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the

owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for

that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or

operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that

schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests.

(§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must

conduct a 6-minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of

this chapter. The Method 9 test must begin within one hour of any observation of visible

emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv))

Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and

notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for

inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least

five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective

action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be

retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may

be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on

microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by

§63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b))

(1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status

under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1))

(2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and

(§63.1355(b)(2))

(3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information

demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record

keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

Reporting:

As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity

results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2))

The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the

provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 45

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0140-002 through EU0160-002 and EU0190-002

10 CSR 10-2.060

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any

source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions

for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible

emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity.

Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures

contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is

operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions

are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For

emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity

standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks

after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this

period, then:

2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a

violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be

observed during this period, then:

3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to

weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in

an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA

Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer.

Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting:

1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units,

2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and

3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any

other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit

established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and

the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is

incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 46

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0140-003 through EU0160-003 and EU0190-003

10 CSR 10-2.030

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation:

The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of 47.77 lbs/hr from any of the raw

material milling process associated equipment.

Monitoring:

The permittee shall comply with the monitoring requirements listed below:

• Baghouse operation and maintenance:

1. Check and document the baghouse pressure drop weekly. If the pressure drop falls out of

the normal operating range, specified by the manufacturer, corrective action shall be

taken within eight (8) hours to return the pressure drop to normal.

2. Check the cleaning sequence of the baghouse monthly.

3. Thoroughly inspect bags for leaks and wear quarterly.

4. Inspect every six (6) months all components that are not subject to wear or plugging,

including structural components, housing, ducts and hoods.

If leaks or abnormal conditions are detected the appropriate measures for remediation shall be

implemented within eight (8) hours. Bag replacement should be documented. Maintain a

written record of the inspection and any action resulting from the inspection. All instruments

and control equipment shall be calibrated, maintained, and operated according to the

manufacturer’s specifications.

Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain a written or electronic record of all inspections and any action

resulting from the inspection.

• The permittee shall retain the calculations showing compliance with 10 CSR 10-2.030.

• These records shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of

Natural Resources’ personnel upon request.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO

65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 47

Project No. 2240-0030-014

EU0170 through EU0180

EU0170 - Raw Mill #1 Grinder

EU0180 - Raw Mill #1 Air Separator

General Description: Raw Mill # 1 Grinder and Air Separator

Installed: 1954

Control Device: Baghouse

Manufacturer/Model #: Nordberg

EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-12

Permit Condition EU0170-001 through EU0180-001

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation:

The owner or operator of each raw mill shall not cause to be discharged from the mill sweep or

air separator air pollution control devices any gases which exhibit opacity in excess of ten

percent. (§63.1347)

Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the raw mill opacity limit

by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter.

The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when the raw mill

is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The

maximum six-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to

determine whether the raw mill is in initial compliance with the standard. The duration of

the Method 9 performance test shall be 3-hours (30 6-minute averages), except that the

duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to 1-hour if the conditions of

§63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)):

(1) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i));

(2) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent for the first 1-hour period.

(§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five years.

(§63.1349(c))

Monitoring:

• The owner or operator of a raw mill shall monitor opacity by conducting daily visual

emissions observations of the mill sweep and air separator PMCDs of these affected

sources, in accordance with the procedures of Method 22 of appendix A of part 60 of this

chapter. The Method 22 test shall be conducted while the affected source is operating at

the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur within the day. The

duration of the Method 22 test shall be six minutes. If visible emissions are observed

during any Method 22 visible emissions test, the owner or operator must (§63.1350(e)):

(1) Initiate, within one-hour, the corrective actions specified in the site specific operating

and maintenance plan developed in accordance with §63.1350(a)(1) and (a)(2).

(§63.1350(e)(1))
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 48

Project No. 2240-0030-014

(2) Within 24 hours of the end of the Method 22 test in which visible emissions were

observed, conduct a visual opacity test of each stack from which visible emissions were

observed in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A of part 60 of this chapter. The

duration of the Method 9 test shall be thirty minutes. (§63.1350(e)(2))

Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and

notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for

inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least

five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective

action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be

retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may

be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on

microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by

§63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b))

(1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status

under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1))

(2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and

(§63.1355(b)(2))

(3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information

demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record

keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

Reporting:

As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity

results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2))

The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the

provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 49

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0170-002 through EU0180-002

10 CSR 10-2.060

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any

source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions

for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible

emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity.

Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures

contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is

operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions

are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For

emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity

standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks

after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this

period, then:

2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a

violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be

observed during this period, then:

3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to

weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in

an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA

Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer.

Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting:

1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units,

2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and

3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any

other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit

established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire

and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is

incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 50

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0170-003 through EU0180-003

10 CSR 10-2.030

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation:

The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of 47.77 lbs/hr either from the raw mill

or the aspirator.

Monitoring:

The permittee shall comply with the monitoring requirements listed below:

• Baghouse operation and maintenance:

1. Check and document the baghouse pressure drop weekly. If the pressure drop falls out of

the normal operating range, specified by the manufacturer, corrective action shall be

taken within eight (8) hours to return the pressure drop to normal.

2. Check the cleaning sequence of the baghouse monthly.

3. Thoroughly inspect bags for leaks and wear quarterly.

4. Inspect every six (6) months all components that are not subject to wear or plugging,

including structural components, housing, ducts and hoods.

If leaks or abnormal conditions are detected the appropriate measures for remediation shall be

implemented within eight (8) hours. Bag replacement should be documented. Maintain a

written record of the inspection and any action resulting from the inspection. All instruments

and control equipment shall be calibrated, maintained, and operated according to the

manufacturer’s specifications.

Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain a written or electronic record of all inspections and any action

resulting from the inspection.

• The permittee shall retain the calculations showing compliance with 10 CSR 10-2.030.

• These records shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of

Natural Resources’ personnel upon request.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO

65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 51

Project No. 2240-0030-014

EU0200

Raw Mill #1 - 10 MMBtu/hr Dryer

General Description: Natural Gas Fired 10 MMBtu/hr Dryer

Installed: 1970

Control Device: Baghouse

Manufacturer/Model #: Nordberg

EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-12

Permit Condition EU0200-001

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation:

The owner or operator shall not cause to be discharged any gases from the affected source

which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent. (§63.1348)

Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with these affected source

opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of

this chapter. The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist

when these affected sources are operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably

expected to occur. The maximum six-minute average opacity exhibited during the test

period shall be used to determine whether these affected sources are in initial compliance

with the standard. The duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be 3-hours (30 6-

minute averages), except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be

reduced to 1-hour if the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply

(§63.1349(b)(2)):

(1) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i));

(2) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent for the first 1-hour period.

(§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five years.

(§63.1349(c))

Monitoring:

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall

monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in

accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly 1-minute visible emissions test of each

affected source in accordance with Method 22 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The

test must be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests for any affected source,

the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semi-annually

for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual test, the

owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and

maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 52

Project No. 2240-0030-014

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the

owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for

that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or

operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that

schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests.

(§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must

conduct a 6-minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of

this chapter. The Method 9 test must begin within one hour of any observation of visible

emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv))

Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and

notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for

inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least

five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective

action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be

retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may

be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on

microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by

§63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b))

(1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status

under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1))

(2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and

(§63.1355(b)(2))

(3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information

demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record

keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

Reporting:

As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity

results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2))

The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the

provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 53

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0200-002

10 CSR 10-2.060

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any

source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions

for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible

emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity.

Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures

contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is

operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions

are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For

emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity

standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks after

permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period,

then:

2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a

violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be

observed during this period, then:

3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to

weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in an

identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA

Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer.

Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting:

1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units,

2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and

3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any

other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit

established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and

the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is

incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 54

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0200-003

10 CSR 10-2.030

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation:

The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of 47.77 lbs/hr from the raw mill dryer.

Monitoring:

The permittee shall comply with the monitoring requirements listed below:

• Baghouse operation and maintenance:

1. Check and document the baghouse pressure drop weekly. If the pressure drop falls out of

the normal operating range, specified by the manufacturer, corrective action shall be

taken within eight (8) hours to return the pressure drop to normal.

2. Check the cleaning sequence of the baghouse monthly.

3. Thoroughly inspect bags for leaks and wear quarterly.

4. Inspect every six (6) months all components that are not subject to wear or plugging,

including structural components, housing, ducts and hoods.

If leaks or abnormal conditions are detected the appropriate measures for remediation shall be

implemented within eight (8) hours. Bag replacement should be documented. Maintain a

written record of the inspection and any action resulting from the inspection. All instruments

and control equipment shall be calibrated, maintained, and operated according to the

manufacturer’s specifications.

Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain a written or electronic record of all inspections and any action

resulting from the inspection.

• The permittee shall retain the calculations showing compliance with 10 CSR 10-2.030.

• These records shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of

Natural Resources’ personnel upon request.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO

65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 55

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0200-004

10 CSR 10-6.260

Restriction of Emission of Sulfur Compounds

Emission Limitation:

• Emissions from any existing source operation shall not contain more than two thousand

parts per million by volume (2000 ppmv).

• Emissions from any existing source operation shall not contain more than seventy milligrams

(70 mg) per cubic meter of sulfuric acid or sulfur trioxide or any combination of those gases

averaged on any consecutive three hour time period.

• No person shall cause or permit the emission of sulfur compounds from any source which

causes or contributes to concentrations exceeding those specified in 10 CSR 10-6.010

Ambient Air Quality Standards.

• The emission unit shall be limited to burning pipeline grade natural gas.

Monitoring:

None

Record Keeping:

None

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than 10 days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-6.260

demonstrated by the appropriate record keeping forms.

10 CSR 10-6.260(4) is a state-only requirement

EU0210 through EU0230 and EU0260

EU0210 - Raw Mill #2 Conveyor (to feed belt)

EU0220 – Raw Mill #2 Feed Belt

EU0230 – Raw Mill #2 Weigh Hopper

EU0260 – Raw Mill #2 Unloading (Airslide to Raw Mix Pumps)

General Description: Raw Material Milling Process Associated Equipment

Installed: 1952

Control Device: Baghouse

Manufacturer/Model #: Nordberg

EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-13

Permit Condition EU0210-001 through EU0230-001 and EU0260-001

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation:

The owner or operator shall not cause to be discharged any gases from these affected sources

which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent. (§63.1348)
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 56

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with these affected sources

opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of

this chapter. The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist

when these affected sources are operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably

expected to occur. The maximum six-minute average opacity exhibited during the test

period shall be used to determine whether these affected sources are in initial compliance

with the standard. The duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be 3-hours (30 6-

minute averages), except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be

reduced to 1-hour if the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply

(§63.1349(b)(2)):

(1) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i));

(2) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent for the first 1-hour period.

(§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five years.

(§63.1349(c))

Monitoring:

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall

monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in

accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly 1-minute visible emissions test of each

affected source in accordance with Method 22 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The

test must be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests for any affected source,

the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semi-annually

for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual test, the

owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and

maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the

owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for

that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or

operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that

schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests.

(§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must

conduct a 6-minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of

this chapter. The Method 9 test must begin within one hour of any observation of visible

emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv))

Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and

notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for

inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least

five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective

action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be

retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may

be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on

microfiche. (§63.1355(a))
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 57

Project No. 2240-0030-014

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by

§63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b))

(1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status

under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1))

(2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and

(§63.1355(b)(2))

(3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information

demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record

keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

Reporting:

As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity

results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2))

The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the

provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]

Permit Condition EU0210-002 through EU0230-002 and EU0260-002

10 CSR 10-2.060

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any

source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions

for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible

emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity.

Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures

contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is

operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions

are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For

emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity

standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks

after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this

period, then:

2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a

violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be

observed during this period, then:

3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to

weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in

an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA

Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 58

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting:

1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units,

2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and

3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any

other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit

established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and

the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is

incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.

Permit Condition EU0210-003 through EU0230-003 and EU0260-003

10 CSR 10-2.030

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation:

The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of 47.77 lbs/hr from any of the raw

material milling process associated equipment.

Monitoring:

The permittee shall comply with the monitoring requirements listed below:

• Baghouse operation and maintenance:

1. Check and document the baghouse pressure drop weekly. If the pressure drop falls out of

the normal operating range, specified by the manufacturer, corrective action shall be

taken within eight (8) hours to return the pressure drop to normal.

2. Check the cleaning sequence of the baghouse monthly.

3. Thoroughly inspect bags for leaks and wear quarterly.

4. Inspect every six (6) months all components that are not subject to wear or plugging,

including structural components, housing, ducts and hoods.

If leaks or abnormal conditions are detected the appropriate measures for remediation shall be

implemented within eight (8) hours. Bag replacement should be documented. Maintain a

written record of the inspection and any action resulting from the inspection. All instruments

and control equipment shall be calibrated, maintained, and operated according to the

manufacturer’s specifications.

Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain a written or electronic record of all inspections and any action

resulting from the inspection.

• The permittee shall retain the calculations showing compliance with 10 CSR 10-2.030.

• These records shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of

Natural Resources’ personnel upon request.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO

65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 59

Project No. 2240-0030-014

EU0240 through EU0250

EU0240 - Raw Mill #2 Grinder

EU0250 - Raw Mill #2 Air Separator

General Description: Raw Mill # 2 Grinder and Air Separator

Installed: 1954

Control Device: Baghouse

Manufacturer/Model #: Nordberg

EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-13

Permit Condition EU0240-001 through EU0250-001

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation:

The owner or operator of each raw mill shall not cause to be discharged from the mill sweep or

air separator air pollution control devices any gases which exhibit opacity in excess of ten

percent. (§63.1347)

Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the raw mill opacity limit

by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter.

The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when the raw mill

is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The

maximum six-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to

determine whether the raw mill is in initial compliance with the standard. The duration of

the Method 9 performance test shall be 3-hours (30 6-minute averages), except that the

duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to 1-hour if the conditions of

§63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)):

(1) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i));

(2) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent for the first 1-hour period.

(§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five years.

(§63.1349(c))

Monitoring:

• The owner or operator of a raw mill shall monitor opacity by conducting daily visual

emissions observations of the mill sweep and air separator PMCDs of these affected

sources, in accordance with the procedures of Method 22 of appendix A of part 60 of this

chapter. The Method 22 test shall be conducted while the affected source is operating at

the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur within the day. The

duration of the Method 22 test shall be six minutes. If visible emissions are observed

during any Method 22 visible emissions test, the owner or operator must (§63.1350(e)):

(1) Initiate, within one-hour, the corrective actions specified in the site specific operating

and maintenance plan developed in accordance with §63.1350(a)(1) and (a)(2).

(§63.1350(e)(1))
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 60

Project No. 2240-0030-014

(2) Within 24 hours of the end of the Method 22 test in which visible emissions were

observed, conduct a visual opacity test of each stack from which visible emissions were

observed in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A of part 60 of this chapter. The

duration of the Method 9 test shall be thirty minutes. (§63.1350(e)(2))

Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and

notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for

inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least

five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective

action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be

retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may

be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on

microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by

§63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b))

(1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status

under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1))

(2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and

(§63.1355(b)(2))

(3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information

demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record

keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

Reporting:

As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity

results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2))

The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the

provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 61

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0240-002 through EU0250-002

10 CSR 10-2.060

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any

source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions

for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible

emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity.

Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures

contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is

operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions

are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For

emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity

standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks

after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this

period, then:

2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a

violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be

observed during this period, then:

3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to

weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in

an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA

Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer.

Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting:

1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units,

2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and

3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any

other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit

established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and

the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is

incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 62

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0240-003 through EU0250-003

10 CSR 10-2.030

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation:

The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of 47.77 lbs/hr either from the raw mill

or the aspirator.

Monitoring:

The permittee shall comply with the monitoring requirements listed below:

• Baghouse operation and maintenance:

1. Check and document the baghouse pressure drop weekly. If the pressure drop falls out of

the normal operating range, specified by the manufacturer, corrective action shall be

taken within eight (8) hours to return the pressure drop to normal.

2. Check the cleaning sequence of the baghouse monthly.

3. Thoroughly inspect bags for leaks and wear quarterly.

4. Inspect every six (6) months all components that are not subject to wear or plugging,

including structural components, housing, ducts and hoods.

If leaks or abnormal conditions are detected the appropriate measures for remediation shall be

implemented within eight (8) hours. Bag replacement should be documented. Maintain a

written record of the inspection and any action resulting from the inspection. All instruments

and control equipment shall be calibrated, maintained, and operated according to the

manufacturer’s specifications.

Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain a written or electronic record of all inspections and any action

resulting from the inspection.

• The permittee shall retain the calculations showing compliance with 10 CSR 10-2.030.

• These records shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of

Natural Resources’ personnel upon request.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO

65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 63

Project No. 2240-0030-014

EU0270

Raw Mill #2 - 10 MMBtu/hr Dryer

General Description: Natural Gas Fired 10 MMBtu/hr Dryer

Installed: 1970

Control Device: Baghouse

Manufacturer/Model #: Nordberg

EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-13

Permit Condition EU0270-001

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation:

The owner or operator shall not cause to be discharged any gases from the affected source

which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent. (§63.1348)

Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with these affected source

opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of

this chapter. The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist

when these affected sources are operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably

expected to occur. The maximum six-minute average opacity exhibited during the test

period shall be used to determine whether these affected sources are in initial compliance

with the standard. The duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be 3-hours (30 6-

minute averages), except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be

reduced to 1-hour if the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply

(§63.1349(b)(2)):

(1) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i));

(2) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent for the first 1-hour period.

(§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five years.

(§63.1349(c))

Monitoring:

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall

monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in

accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly 1-minute visible emissions test of each

affected source in accordance with Method 22 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The

test must be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests for any affected source,

the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semi-annually

for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual test, the

owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and

maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 64

Project No. 2240-0030-014

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the

owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for

that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or

operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that

schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests.

(§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must

conduct a 6-minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of

this chapter. The Method 9 test must begin within one hour of any observation of visible

emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv))

Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and

notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for

inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least

five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective

action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be

retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may

be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on

microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by

§63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b))

(1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status

under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1))

(2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and

(§63.1355(b)(2))

(3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information

demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record

keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

Reporting:

As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity

results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2))

The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the

provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 65

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0270-002

10 CSR 10-2.060

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any

source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions

for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible

emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity.

Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures

contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is

operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions

are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For

emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity

standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks

after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this

period, then:

2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a

violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be

observed during this period, then:

3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to

weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in

an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA

Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer.

Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting:

1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units,

2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and

3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any

other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit

established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and

the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is

incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 66

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0270-003

10 CSR 10-2.030

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation:

The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of 47.77 lbs/hr from the raw material

dryer.

Monitoring:

The permittee shall comply with the monitoring requirements listed below:

• Baghouse operation and maintenance:

1. Check and document the baghouse pressure drop weekly. If the pressure drop falls out of

the normal operating range, specified by the manufacturer, corrective action shall be

taken within eight (8) hours to return the pressure drop to normal.

2. Check the cleaning sequence of the baghouse monthly.

3. Thoroughly inspect bags for leaks and wear quarterly.

4. Inspect every six (6) months all components that are not subject to wear or plugging,

including structural components, housing, ducts and hoods.

If leaks or abnormal conditions are detected the appropriate measures for remediation shall be

implemented within eight (8) hours. Bag replacement should be documented. Maintain a

written record of the inspection and any action resulting from the inspection. All instruments

and control equipment shall be calibrated, maintained, and operated according to the

manufacturer’s specifications.

Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain a written or electronic record of all inspections and any action

resulting from the inspection.

• The permittee shall retain the calculations showing compliance with 10 CSR 10-2.030.

• These records shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of

Natural Resources’ personnel upon request.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO

65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 67

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0270-004

10 CSR 10-6.260

Restriction of Emission of Sulfur Compounds

Emission Limitation:

• Emissions from any existing source operation shall not contain more than two thousand

parts per million by volume (2000 ppmv).

• Emissions from any existing source operation shall not contain more than seventy milligrams

(70 mg) per cubic meter of sulfuric acid or sulfur trioxide or any combination of those gases

averaged on any consecutive three hour time period.

• No person shall cause or permit the emission of sulfur compounds from any source which

causes or contributes to concentrations exceeding those specified in 10 CSR 10-6.010

Ambient Air Quality Standards.

• The emission unit shall be limited to burning pipeline grade natural gas.

Monitoring:

None

Record Keeping:

The permittee shall maintain an accurate record of the sulfur content of fuel as fired. These

records shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of Natural

Resources' personnel upon request.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than 10 days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-6.260

demonstrated by the appropriate record keeping forms.

10 CSR 10-6.260(4) is a state-only requirement

EU0280 through EU0300

EU0280 – Blend Silos

EU0290 – Blend Conveyor

EU0300 – Kiln Feed Leveling Box

General Description: Blend Silos – Raw mix unloading to blend silos (pneumatic conveying)

Installed: 1952

Control Device: Baghouse

Blend Conveyor & Kiln Feed Leveling Box (kiln feed handling systems)

- Raw materials are transfered from the blend silos via a blend

conveyor to a kiln feed leveling box and are then fed to the rotary

cement kilns. These systems consist of mechanical screw conveyors

and elevators that are vented to two fabric filter baghouses. Installed:

1952

Manufacturer/Model #:

EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-14, EP-15 & EP-16
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 68

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0280-001 through EU0300-001

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation:

The owner or operator of each raw material storage bin; conveying system transfer point; and

bulk loading or unloading system shall not cause to be discharged any gases from raw

material storage bin; conveying system transfer point; bagging system; and bulk loading or

unloading system which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent. (§63.1348)

Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the raw material storage

bin; conveying system transfer point; and bulk loading or unloading system opacity limit by

conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter.

The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when the raw

material storage bin; conveying system transfer point; and bulk loading or unloading

system is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The

maximum six-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to

determine whether the raw material storage bin; conveying system transfer point; and bulk

loading or unloading system is in initial compliance with the standard. The duration of the

Method 9 performance test shall be 3-hours (30 6-minute averages), except that the

duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to 1-hour if the conditions of

§63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)):

(1) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i));

(2) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent for the first 1-hour period.

(§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five years.

(§63.1349(c))

Monitoring:

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall

monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in

accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly 1-minute visible emissions test of each

affected source in accordance with Method 22 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The

test must be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests for any affected source,

the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semi-annually

for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual test, the

owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and

maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the

owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for

that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or

operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that

schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests.

(§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 69

Project No. 2240-0030-014

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must

conduct a 6-minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of

this chapter. The Method 9 test must begin within one hour of any observation of visible

emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv))

Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and

notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for

inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least

five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective

action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be

retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may

be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on

microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by

§63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b))

(1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status

under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1))

(2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and

(§63.1355(b)(2))

(3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information

demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record

keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

Reporting:

As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity

results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2))

The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the

provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 70

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0280-002 through EU0300-002

10 CSR 10-2.060

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any

source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions

for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible

emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity.

Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures

contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is

operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions

are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For

emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity

standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks

after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this

period, then:

2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a

violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be

observed during this period, then:

3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to

weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in

an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA

Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer.

Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting:

1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units,

2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and

3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any

other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit

established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and

the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is

incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 71

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0280-003 through EU0300-003

10 CSR 10-2.030

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation:

The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of :

• 54.72 lbs/hr from EU0280;

• 52.84 lbs/hr from EU0290; and

• 52.84 lbs/hr from EU0300

Monitoring:

None

Record Keeping:

None

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO

65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.

EU0310 through EU0340

EU0310 – Coal/Coke Unloading to Transfer Conveyor

EU0320 – Fuel Grinding Mills

EU0330 – Transfer Conveyor Unloading to Fuel Hopper

EU0340 – Fuel Hopper Unloading to Fuel Silo Conveyor

General Description: Kiln Burner Building – Solid fuel is reclaimed from the stockpiles and

loaded to a transfer conveyor. The conveyor transports the fuel to the

fuel hopper. The fuel hopper transfers the fuel to another conveyor

that transports the fuel to the coal or coke silos. All

transfer/transport operations are contained within the kiln burner

building.

Installed: 1952 - 1954

Manufacturer/Model #:

EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-18

Permit Condition EU0310-001 through EU0340-001

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation:

The owner or operator of each raw material storage bin; conveying system transfer point; and

bulk loading or unloading system shall not cause to be discharged any gases from raw

material storage bin; conveying system transfer point; bagging system; and bulk loading or

unloading system which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent. (§63.1348)
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 72

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the raw material storage

bin; conveying system transfer point; and bulk loading or unloading system opacity limit by

conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter.

The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when the raw

material storage bin; conveying system transfer point; and bulk loading or unloading

system is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The

maximum six-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to

determine whether the raw material storage bin; conveying system transfer point; and bulk

loading or unloading system is in initial compliance with the standard. The duration of the

Method 9 performance test shall be 3-hours (30 6-minute averages), except that the

duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to 1-hour if the conditions of

§63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)):

(1) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i));

(2) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent for the first 1-hour period.

(§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five years.

(§63.1349(c))

Monitoring:

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall

monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in

accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly 1-minute visible emissions test of each

affected source in accordance with Method 22 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The

test must be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests for any affected source,

the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semi-annually

for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual test, the

owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and

maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the

owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for

that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or

operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that

schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests.

(§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must

conduct a 6-minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of

this chapter. The Method 9 test must begin within one hour of any observation of visible

emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv))

Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and

notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for

inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least

five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective

action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be

retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 73

Project No. 2240-0030-014

be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on

microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by

§63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b))

(1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status

under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1))

(2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and

(§63.1355(b)(2))

(3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information

demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record

keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

Reporting:

As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity

results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2))

The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the

provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 74

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0310-002 through EU0340-002

10 CSR 10-2.060

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any

source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions

for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible

emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity.

Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures

contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is

operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions

are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For

emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity

standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks

after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this

period, then:

2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a

violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be

observed during this period, then:

3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to

weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in

an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA

Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer.

Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting:

1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units,

2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and

3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any

other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit

established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and

the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is

incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 75

Project No. 2240-0030-014

EU0350 through EU0360

EU0350 – Coal Silos

EU0360 – Coke/NH Fuel Substitute Silo (Unloading from Conveyor to Silo)

General Description: Solid Fuel Handling – Solid Fuel Storage and Conveying.

Installed: 1952 - 1954

Manufacturer/Model #:

EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-19 & EP-20

Permit Condition EU0350-001 through EU0360-001

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation:

The owner or operator of each raw material storage bin shall not cause to be discharged any

gases from raw material storage bin which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent. (§63.1348)

Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the raw material storage

bin opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60

of this chapter. The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist

when the raw material storage bin is operating at the highest load or capacity level

reasonably expected to occur. The maximum six-minute average opacity exhibited during

the test period shall be used to determine whether the raw material storage bin is in initial

compliance with the standard. The duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be 3-

hours (30 6-minute averages), except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test

may be reduced to 1-hour if the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii)

apply (§63.1349(b)(2)):

(1) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i));

(2) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent for the first 1-hour period.

(§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five years.

(§63.1349(c))

Monitoring:

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall

monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in

accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly 1-minute visible emissions test of each

affected source in accordance with Method 22 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The

test must be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests for any affected source,

the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semi-annually

for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual test, the

owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and

maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 76

Project No. 2240-0030-014

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the

owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for

that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or

operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that

schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests.

(§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must

conduct a 6-minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of

this chapter. The Method 9 test must begin within one hour of any observation of visible

emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv))

Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and

notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for

inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least

five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective

action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be

retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may

be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on

microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by

§63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b))

(1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status

under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1))

(2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and

(§63.1355(b)(2))

(3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information

demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record

keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

Reporting:

As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity

results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2))

The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the

provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 77

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0350-002 through EU0360-002

10 CSR 10-2.060

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any

source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions

for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible

emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity.

Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures

contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is

operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions

are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For

emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity

standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks

after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this

period, then:

2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a

violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be

observed during this period, then:

3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to

weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in

an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA

Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer.

Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting:

1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units,

2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and

3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any

other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit

established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and

the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is

incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 78

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0350-003 through EU00360-003

10 CSR 10-2.030

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation:

• The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of 42.53 lbs/hr from any of the

emission units (EU0350 or EU0360).

Monitoring:

None

Record Keeping:

None

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.

EU0370 through EU0380

EU0370 – Rotary Cement Kiln #1

EU0380 – Rotary Cement Kiln #2

General Description: Two Rotary Cement Kilns - The two kilns are capable of processing

140 tons of raw material and 13.7 tons of solid fuel per hour and

producing approximately 75 tons of cement clinker per hour.

Installed: 1952 (Kiln #1); 1954 (Kiln #2)

Control Device: High Efficiency ESP

Manufacturer/Model #: F.L. Smith (Kiln #1); Allis Chalmers (Kiln #2)

EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-21

Permit Condition EU0370-001 through EU0380-001

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Particulate Matter (PM)

Emission Limitation:

No owner or operator of a kiln shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from these

affected sources, any gases which contain particulate matter in excess of 0.15 kg per MG (0.30

lb per ton) of feed (dry basis) to the kiln. (§63.1343(b)(1))

Performance Testing:

• The permittee shall demonstrate initial compliance with the kiln by conducting a

performance test as specified in §63.1349(b)(1)(i) through (b)(1)(iv). (§63.1349)(b)

• EPA Method 5 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter shall be used to determine PM

emissions. Each performance test shall consist of three separate runs under the conditions

that exist when the kiln is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably

expected to occur. Each run shall be conducted for at least one hour, and the minimum

sample volume shall be 0.85 dscm (30 dscf). The average of the three runs shall be used to

determine compliance. A determination of the particulate matter collected in the impingers
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 79

Project No. 2240-0030-014

(“back half”) of the Method 5 particulate sampling train is not required to demonstrate

initial compliance with the PM standards of this subpart. However, this shall not preclude

the permitting authority from requiring a determination of the “back half” for other

purposes. (§63.1349(b)(1)(i))

• Suitable methods shall be used to determine the kiln feed rate, except for fuels, for each

run. (§63.1349(b)(1)(ii))

• The emission rate, E of PM shall be computed for each run using the following equation

(§63.1349(b)(1)(iii)): E = ( ) CsQsd P

Where:

E = emission rate of PM, kg/Mg of kiln feed

Cs = concentration of PM, kg/dscm

Qsd = volumetric flow rate of effluent gas, dscm/hr

P = total kiln feed (dry basis), Mg/hr

• Except as provided in §63.1349(e), performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(1) shall

be repeated every five years. (§63.1349(c))

• The owner or operator is required to repeat the performance tests for kilns or in-line

kiln/raw mills as specified in §63.1349(b)(1) and (b)(3) within 90 days of initiating any

significant change in the feed or fuel form that used in the previous performance test.

(§63.1349(e))

Monitoring:

• The owner or operator shall install, calibrate, maintain and operate a particulate matter

continuous emission monitoring system (PM CEMS) to measure the particulate matter

discharged to the atmosphere. The compliance deadline for installing the PM CEMS and all

requirements relating to performance of the PM CEMS and implementation of the PM CEMS

requirement is deferred pending further rulemaking. (§63.1350(k))

• Pending further rulemaking, the permittee shall comply with the monitoring requirements listed

below:

Electrostatic Precipitators operation and maintenance:

(1) An audible or visual alarm that indicates precipitator trouble shall be monitored.

(2) The permittee shall monitor the primary and secondary voltage and current, and spark rate

once each week after the date on which the performance test is completed. The parameters to

be used as indicators of compliance shall be set at values (ranges) measured at the time

when the performance test demonstrates compliance with the emission limit.

If abnormal conditions are detected, the appropriate measures for remediation shall be

implemented within eight (8) hours. All instruments and control equipment shall be calibrated,

maintained, and operated according to the manufacture specifications.

Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and

notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for

inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least

five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective

action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be

retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may

be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on

microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by

§63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b))
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 80

Project No. 2240-0030-014

(1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status

under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1))

(2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and

(§63.1355(b)(2))

(3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information

demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record

keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

• The owner or operator of an affected source equipped with a continuous monitoring system

shall maintain all records required by §63.10(c). (§63.1355(c))

• The permittee shall maintain a written or electronic record of all inspections and any action

resulting from the inspection. These records shall be made available immediately for

inspection to the Department of Natural Resources’ personnel upon request

Reporting:

• The permittee shall comply with the reporting requirements for the performance test stated

in Permit Condition: PW007.

• As required by §63.10(d)(2), the owner or operator shall report the results of performance

tests as part of the notification of compliance status. (§63.1354(b)(1))

• As required by §63.10(e)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source equipped with a

continuous emission monitor shall submit an excess emissions and continuous monitoring

system performance report for any event when the continuous monitoring system data

indicates the source is not in compliance with the applicable emission limitation or

operating parameter limit. (§63.1354(b)(8))

• If the total continuous monitoring system downtime for any CEM or any continuous

monitoring system (CMS) for the reporting period is ten percent or greater of the total

operating time for the reporting period, the owner or operator shall submit an excess

emissions and continuous monitoring performance report along with the summary report

(mentioned in PW003). (§63.1354(b)(10))

The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the

provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 81

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0370-002 through EU0380-002

10 CSR 10-2.030

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation:

The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of 42.03 lbs/hr from each kiln.

Monitoring:

The permittee shall comply with the monitoring requirements listed below:

• Electrostatic Precipitators operation and maintenance:

(1) An audible or visual alarm that indicates precipitator trouble shall be monitored.

(2) The permittee shall monitor the primary and secondary voltage and current, and spark rate

once each week after the date on which the performance test is completed. The parameters

to be used as indicators of compliance shall be set at values (ranges) measured at the time

when the performance test demonstrates compliance with the emission limit.

If abnormal conditions are detected, the appropriate measures for remediation shall be

implemented within eight (8) hours. All instruments and control equipment shall be calibrated,

maintained, and operated according to the manufacture specifications.

Record Keeping:

Records shall be maintained on site for five (5) years and be made available immediately for

inspection to the Department of Natural Resources’ personnel upon request. The records shall

indicate the following:

• Record of the stack testing or test information required by this permit.

• Any monitoring or control equipment malfunctions.

• All corrective action records.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO

65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 82

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0370-003 through EU0380-003

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation:

No owner or operator of a kiln shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from these

affected sources, any gases which exhibit opacity greater than 20 percent. (§63.1343(b)(2))

Performance Testing:

• The opacity exhibited during the period of the Method 5 performance test for particulate

matter required by §63.1349(b)(1)(i) shall be determined as required in §63.1349(b)(1)(v)

through (vi). (§63.1349(b)(1))

• Except as provided in §63.1349(b)(1)(vi), the opacity exhibited ruing the period of the

Method 5 performance tests required by §63.1349(b)(1)(i) shall be determined through the

use of a continuous opacity monitor (COM). The maximum six-minute average opacity

during the three Method 5 test runs shall be determined during each Method 5 test run,

and used to demonstrate initial compliance with the applicable opacity limits of

§63.1343(b)(2). (§63.1349(b)(1)(v))

• Each owner or operator of a kiln using an electrostatic precipitator exhausting through a

monovent, or if the use of a COM in accordance with the installation specifications of

Performance Specification 1 (PS-1) of appendix B to part 60 of this chapter is not feasible, a

test shall be conducted in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this

chapter during each Method 5 performance test required by §63.1349(b)(1)(i). The

maximum six-minute average opacity shall be determined during the three Method 5 test

runs, and used to demonstrate initial compliance with the applicable opacity limits of

§63.1343(b)(2). (§63.1349(b)(1)(vi))

Monitoring:

• The owner or operator of a kiln shall monitor opacity at each point where emissions are

vented from these affected sources including alkali bypasses in accordance with

§63.1350(c)(1) through (c)(3). (§63.1350(c))

• Except as provided in §63.1350(c)(2), the owner or operator shall install, calibrate,

maintain, and continuously operate a continuous opacity monitor (COM) located at the

outlet of the PM control device to continuously monitor the opacity. The COM shall be

installed, maintained, calibrated, and operated as required by subpart A, general provisions

of this part, and according to PS-1 of appendix B to part 60 of this chapter. (§63.1350(c)(1))

• The owner or operator of a kiln with an electrostatic precipitator exhausting through a

monovent, or if the use of a COM in accordance with the installation specifications of PS-1

of appendix B to part 60 of this chapter is not feasible, the owner or operator must monitor

opacity in accordance with §63.1350(c)(2)(i) through (ii). (§63.1350(c)(2))

(1) Perform daily visual opacity observations of each stack in accordance with the

procedures of Method 9 of appendix A of part 60 of this chapter. The Method 9 test

shall be conducted while the affected source is operating at the highest load or capacity

level reasonably expected to occur within the day. The duration of the Method 9 test

shall be at least 30 minutes each day. (§63.1350(c)(2)(i))

(2) Use the Method 9 procedures to monitor and record the average opacity for each sixminute period during the test. (§63.1350(c)(2)(ii))
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 83

Project No. 2240-0030-014

• To remain in compliance, the opacity must be maintained such that the 6-minute average

opacity for any 6-minute block period does not exceed 20 percent. If the average opacity for

any 6-minute block period exceeds 20 percent, this shall constitute a violation of the

standard. (§63.1350(c)(3))

Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and

notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for

inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least

five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective

action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be

retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may

be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on

microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by

§63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b))

(1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status

under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1))

(2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and

(§63.1355(b)(2))

(3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information

demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record

keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

• The owner or operator of an affected source equipped with a continuous monitoring system

shall maintain all records required by §63.10(c). (§63.1355(c))

Reporting:

• As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the

opacity results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2))

• As required by §63.10(e)(2), the owner or operator of an affected source using a continuous

opacity monitoring system to determine opacity compliance during any performance test

required under §63.7 and described in §63.6(d)(6) shall report the results of the continuous

opacity monitoring system performance evaluation conducted under §63.8(e).

(§63.1354(b)(7))

• As required by §63.10(e)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source equipped with a

continuous emission monitor shall submit an excess emissions and continuous monitoring

system performance report for any event when the continuous monitoring system data

indicates the source is not in compliance with the applicable emission limitation or

operating parameter limit. (§63.1354(b)(8))

• If the total continuous monitoring system downtime for any CEM or any continuous

monitoring system (CMS) for the reporting period is ten percent or greater of the total

operating time for the reporting period, the owner or operator shall submit an excess

emissions and continuous monitoring performance report along with the summary report

(mentioned in PW003). (§63.1354(b)(10))

The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the

provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 84

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0370-004 through EU0380-004

10 CSR 10-2.060

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any

source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions

for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible

emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity.

Monitoring:

• A continuous opacity monitoring system shall be used to determine the opacity of the stack

gases generated by the boiler. Sampling frequency shall be in accordance with 40 CFR Part

60.13(e)(1). Results shall be recorded on a Data Acquisition System (DAHS).

• The permittee shall calibrate, maintain, and operate a continuous opacity monitoring system

for measuring opacity. The installation shall conduct a daily calibration check on the

monitoring system as outlined by 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix B – Performance Specification 1.

Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall record the daily monitoring system calibration check done on the

continuous opacity monitoring system.

• These records shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of

Natural Resource’s personnel upon request.

• All records must be maintained for five (5) years.

• This installation shall maintain records (the data these records are to contain are defined in

the regulations) to include:

(1) The charts generated by the continuous opacity, monitor.

(2) An opacity summary report.

(3) An excess opacity emission summary.

(4) An excess opacity emission summary list.

(5) An opacity monitoring downtime summary list.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

Reporting:

• The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than 10 days after any exceedance of the opacity limit

established by 10 CSR 10-2.060 or 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could

possible cause an opacity exceedance.

• The permittee shall report quarterly when the monitoring system showed exceedances of the

opacity limitations set forth in this rule. If any exceedances were recorded, the quarterly

report should give the day, the duration of how long the emission unit was out of the

limitations set forth in this rule, and a data summary of the exceedance (the data summary

shall consist of the magnitude in actual percent opacity of all six (6)-minute averages of

opacity greater than the opacity emission limitation). Additionally, the report shall give a

detailed explanation of why the plant was in exceedance (nature and cause) and corrective

action taken by Lafarge to bring the emission unit back into the limitations set forth in this
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 85

Project No. 2240-0030-014

rule. If no excess emissions occurred within the quarter and the continuous opacity

monitoring system has not been inoperative, repaired, or adjusted, that information shall be

included in the report. All quarterly reports shall be postmarked by the thirtieth (30) day

following the end of each calendar quarter.

• The permittee shall submit in the quarterly compliance report to the Air Pollution Control

Enforcement Section a summary that all daily continuous opacity monitoring calibration

checks were done within the semi-annual period. Additionally, if any of the daily calibration

checks of the monitoring system was not done, Lafarge shall also report the day and a

detailed explanation of why the calibration check was not done in the semi-annual report. If

the continuous opacity monitoring system was inoperative, the report shall include the date,

time, and the nature of system repairs or adjustments. The permittee shall also include in

the semi-annual report if the annual certification was done within the time period on the

continuous opacity monitoring system and include all revenant certification test results

within the report.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and

the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is

incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.

Permit Condition EU0370-005 through EU0380-005

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Dioxins and Furans (D/F)

Emission Limitation:

• No owner or operator of a kiln shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from these

affected sources, any gases which contain D/F in excess of:

(1) 0.20 ng per dscm (8.7x10-11 gr per dscf) (TEQ) corrected to seven percent oxygen; or

(2) 0.40 ng per dscm (1.7x10-10 gr per dscf) (TEQ) corrected to seven percent oxygen, when

the average of the performance test run average temperatures at the inlet to the

particulate matter control device is 204°C (400°F) or less. (§63.1343(b)(3))

• The owner or operator of a kiln subject to a D/F emission limitation under §63.1343 must

operate the kiln such that the temperature of the gas at the inlet to the kiln particulate

matter control device (PMCD) and alkali bypass PMCD, if applicable, does not exceed the

applicable temperature limit specified in §63.1344(b). (§63.1344(a))

• The temperature limit for a kiln meeting the limits of §63.1344(a) is determined in

accordance with §63.1349(b)(3)(iv). (§63.1344(b))

• The owner or operator of a kiln subject to a D/F emission limitation under §63.1343 that

employs carbon injection as an emission control technique must operate the carbon injection

system in accordance with §63.1344(c)(1) and §63.1344(c)(2). (§63.1344(c))

(1) The three-hour rolling average activated carbon injection rate shall be equal to or

greater than the activated carbon injection rate determine in accordance with

§63.1349(b)(3)(vi). (§63.1344(c)(1))

(2) The owner or operator shall either (§63.1344(c)(2)):

(i) Maintain the minimum activated carbon injection carrier gas flow rate, as a threehour rolling average, based on the manufacturer’s specification. These

specifications must be documented in the test plan developed in accordance with

§63.7(c), or (§63.1344(c)(2)(i))

(ii) Maintain the minimum activated carbon injection carrier gas pressure drop, as a

three-hour rolling average, based on the manufacturer’s specifications. These
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 86

Project No. 2240-0030-014

specifications must be documented in the test plan developed in accordance with

§63.7(c). (§63.1344(c)(2)(ii))

• Except as provided in §63.1344(e), the owner or operator of a kiln subject to a D/F emission

limitation under §63.1343 that employs carbon injection as an emission control techniques

must specify and use the brand and type of activated carbon used during the performance

test until a subsequent performance test is conducted, unless the site-specific performance

test plan contains documentation of key parameters that affect adsorption and the owner or

operator establishes limits based on those parameters, and the limits on these parameters

are maintained §63.1344(d).

• The owner or operator of a kiln subject to a D/F emission limitation under §63.1343 that

employs carbon injection as an emission control techniques may substitute, at any time, a

different brand or type of activated carbon provided that the replacement has equivalent or

improved properties compared to the activated carbon specified in the site-specific

performance test plan and used in the performance test. The owner or operator must

maintain documentation that the substitute activated carbon will provide the same or better

level of control as the original activated carbon §63.1344(e).

Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the D/F emission limit by

conducting a performance test using Method 23 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter.

(§63.1349(b)(3))

• Each performance test shall consist of three separate runs; each run shall be conducted

under the conditions that exist when the affected source is operating at the highest load or

capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The duration of each run shall be at least

three hours and the sample volume for each run shall be at least 2.5 dscm (90 dscf). The

concentration shall be determined for each run and the arithmetic average of the

concentrations measure for the three runs shall be calculated and used to determine

compliance. (§63.1349(b)(3)(i))

• The temperature at the inlet to the kiln or in-line kiln/raw mill PMCD, and where

applicable, the temperature at the inlet to the alkali bypass PMCD, must be continuously

recorded during the period of the Method 23 test, and the continuous temperature record(s)

must be included in the performance test report. (§63.1349(b)(3)(ii))

• One-minute average temperatures must be calculated for each minute of each run of the

test. (§63.1349(b)(3)(iii))

• The run average temperature must be calculated for each run, and the average of the run

average temperatures must be determined and included in the performance test report and

will determine the applicable temperature limit in accordance with §63.1344(b).

(§63.1349(b)(3)(iv))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(3) shall be repeated every 30 months.

(§63.1349(d))

• The owner or operator is required to repeat the performance tests for kilns or in-line

kiln/raw mills as specified in §63.1349(b)(1) and (b)(3) within 90 days of initiating any

significant change in the feed or fuel form that was used in the previous performance test.

(§63.1349(e))

Monitoring:

• The owner or operator of an affected source subject to a limitation on D/F emissions shall

monitor D/F emissions in accordance with §63.1350(f)(1) through (f)(6). (§63.1350(f))
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 87

Project No. 2240-0030-014

• The owner or operator shall install, calibrate, maintain and continuously operate a

continuous monitor to record the temperature of the exhaust gases from the kiln at the

inlet to, or upstream of, the kiln PM control devices. (§63.1350(f)(1))

(1) The recorder response range must include zero and 1.5 times either of the average

temperatures established according to the requirements in §63.1349(b)(3)(iv).

(§63.1350(f)(1)(i))

(2) The reference method must be a National Institute of Standards and Technology

calibrated reference thermocouple-potentiometer system or alternate reference, subject

to approval by the Administrator. (§63.1350(f)(1)(ii))

• The owner or operator shall monitor and continuously record the temperature of the

exhaust gases from the kiln, at the inlet to the kiln PMCD. (§63.1350(f)(2))

• The three-hour rolling average temperature shall be calculated as the average of 180

successive one-minute average temperatures. (§63.1350(f)(3))

• Periods of time when one-minute averages are not available shall be ignored when

calculating three-hour rolling averages. When one-minute averages become available, the

first one-minute average is added to the previous 179 values to calculate the three-hour

rolling average. (§63.1350(f)(4))

• The calibration of all thermocouples and other temperature sensors shall be verified at least

once every three months. (§63.1350(f)(6))

• The owner or operator of any kiln subject to a D/F emission limit shall conduct an

inspection of the components of the combustion system of each kiln at least once per year.

(§63.1350(i))

Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and

notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for

inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least

five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective

action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be

retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may

be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on

microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by

§63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b))

(1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status

under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1))

(2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and

(§63.1355(b)(2))

(3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information

demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record

keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

• The owner or operator of an affected source equipped with a continuous monitoring system

shall maintain all records required by §63.10(c). (§63.1355(c))

Reporting:

• The permittee shall comply with the reporting requirements for the performance test stated

in Permit Condition: PW007.

• As required by §63.10(d)(2), the owner or operator shall report the results of performance

tests as part of the notification of compliance status. (§63.1354(b)(1))
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 88

Project No. 2240-0030-014

• As required by §63.10(e)(2), the owner or operator shall submit a written report of the

results of the performance evaluation for the continuous monitoring system required by

§63.8(e). The owner or operator shall submit the report simultaneously with the results of

the performance test. (§63.1354(b)(6))

• If the total continuous monitoring system downtime for any CEM or any continuous

monitoring system (CMS) for the reporting period is ten percent or greater of the total

operating time for the reporting period, the owner or operator shall submit an excess

emissions and continuous monitoring performance report along with the summary report

(mentioned in PW003). (§63.1354(b)(10))

The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the

provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]

Permit Condition EU0370-006 through EU0380-006

10 CSR 10-6.060

Construction Permits Required

Construction Permit No. 0891-005A

Emission Limitation:

• Lafarge Corporation shall ensure that the sulfur content of the non-hazardous waste used for

raw material substitution, as fired, is less than one-half percent (0.5%) by weight, [Special

Condition 1]

• Lafarge Corporation shall ensure that the substitution rate of the non-hazardous waste will

be less than five percent (5%) of kiln feed, or 5.36 tons per hour, whichever is less. [Special

Condition 2]

• Lafarge Corporation shall ensure that the sulfur content of the non-hazardous organic waste

used as a substitute for coke, as fired, is less than four percent (4%) by weight and that the

sulfur content of the non-hazardous organic waste used as a substitute for coal, as fired, is

less than one percent (1%) by weight. [Special Condition 3]

• Lafarge Corporation shall ensure that the substitution rate of the non-hazardous organic

waste will be less than twenty-five percent (25%) of kiln feed, or 3.2 tons per hour, whichever

is less. [Special Condition 4]

• Lafarge Corporation shall ensure that the increase in emissions due to the utilization of the

proposed non-hazardous waste materials will not cause an increase in emissions over the

calculated baseline, in excess of the de minims emissions limits set forth in Missouri State

Rule 10 CSR 10-6.060, “Construction Permits Required,” (7)(A), Table 1 for any criteria

pollutant. [Special Condition 5]

• Lafarge Corporation shall abide by the following specifications for non-hazardous wastes to

be used for direct raw material substitution: [Special Condition 6]

Cement Constituents

Oxide of Silica + Alumina + Iron + Calcium > 80%

Total Sulfur < 0.5% Total Halogens < 3.0%

Organics

Total Hydrocarbon as Diesel < 10%

Volatile Organics < 1.0%

TCLP Test

Arsenic < 5 ppm Lead < 5 ppm

Barium < 100 ppm Mercury < 0.2 ppm

Cadmium < 1 ppm Selenium < 1 ppm

Total Chromium < 5 ppm Silver < 5 ppm
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 89

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Other

Corrosivity, pH 2 – 12.5 Flash Point > 140OF

PCBs < 40 ppm Cyanides < 100 ppm

• Lafarge Corporation shall abide by the following specifications for non-hazardous wastes to

be used for direct fuel substitution: [Special Condition 7]

Fuel Characteristics

Lower heating value, BTU per pound, as received : > 5000

Ash < 50%

Cement Constituents in Ash

Total Halogens < 3.0%

TCLP Test

Arsenic < 5 ppm Lead < 5 ppm

Barium < 100 ppm Mercury < 0.2 ppm

Cadmium < 1 ppm Selenium < 1 ppm

Total Chromium < 5 ppm Silver < 5 ppm

Other

Corrosivity, pH 2 – 12.5 Flash Point > 140OF

PCBs < 40 ppm Cyanides < 100 ppm

Monitoring:

Records of non-hazardous wastes and specifications.

Record Keeping:

Lafarge Corporation shall keep monthly records on site, covering a period including at least the

previous 24-months, which detail, for each month, the following items: [Special Condition 8}

• The amount, in tons, of non-hazardous wastes accepted for use for raw material substitution,

together with the specifications for that waste; and

• The amount, in tons, of non-hazardous organic wastes accepted for use as a substitute for

coal or coke, together with the specifications for that waste.

Reporting:

Lafarge Corporation shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of any of the terms

imposed by Construction Permit No. 0891-005A.

Permit Condition EU0370-007 through EU0380-007

10 CSR 10-6.260

Restriction of Emission of Sulfur Compounds

Emission Limitation:

• Emissions from any existing source operation shall not contain more than two thousand

parts per million by volume (2000 ppmv).

• Emissions from any existing source operation shall not contain more than seventy milligrams

(70 mg) per cubic meter of sulfuric acid or sulfur trioxide or any combination of those gases

averaged on any consecutive three hour time period.

Monitoring:

None.

Record Keeping:

None
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 90

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than 10 days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-6.260

demonstrated by the appropriate record keeping forms.

10 CSR 10-6.260(4) is a state-only requirement

EU0390 through EU0400

EU0390 – Clinker Cooler #1

EU0400 – Clinker Cooler #2

General Description: Clinker Coolers: Clinker exiting the rotary cement kilns pass through

clinker coolers prior to storage or use in the finish mills. The #1

clinker cooler services the #1 kiln, and the #2 clinker cooler services

the #2 kiln.

Installed: 1952 (Clinker Cooler #1); 1954 (Clinker Cooler #2)

Control Device: High Temperature Fabric Filter

Manufacturer/Model #: Fuller

EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-22 & 23; EP-24 & 25

Permit Condition EU0390-001 through EU0400-001

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Particulate Matter

Emission Limitation:

No owner or operator shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from the clinker cooler

any gases which contain particulate matter in excess of 0.050 kg per Mg (0.10 lb per ton) of

feed (dry basis) to the kiln. (§63.1345(a)(1))

Performance Testing:

• The permittee shall demonstrate initial compliance with the clinker cooler by conducting a

performance test as specified in §63.1349(b)(1)(i) through (b)(1)(iii). (§63.1349(b)(1)

• EPA Method 5 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter shall be used to determine PM

emissions. Each performance test shall consist of three separate runs under the conditions

that exist when the clinker cooler is operating at the highest load or capacity level

reasonably expected to occur. Each run shall be conducted for at least one hour, and the

minimum sample volume shall be 0.85 dscm (30 dscf). The average of the three runs shall

be used to determine compliance. A determination of the particulate matter collected in the

impingers (“back half”) of the Method 5 particulate sampling train is not required to

demonstrate initial compliance with the PM standards of this subpart. However, this shall

not preclude the permitting authority from requiring a determination of the “back half” for

other purposes. (§63.1349(b)(1)(i))

• Suitable methods shall be used to determine the kiln feed rate, except for fuels, for each

run. (§63.1349(b)(1)(ii))

• The emission rate, E of PM shall be computed for each run using the following equation

(§63.1349(b)(1)(iii)): E = ( ) CsQsd P

Where:

E = emission rate of PM, kg/Mg of kiln feed
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 91

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Cs = concentration of PM, kg/dscm

Qsd = volumetric flow rate of effluent gas, dscm/hr

P = total kiln feed (dry basis), Mg/hr

• Except as provided in §63.1349(e), performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(1) shall

be repeated every five years. (§63.1349(c))

Monitoring:

The permittee shall comply with the monitoring requirements listed below:

• Baghouse operation and maintenance:

1. Check and document the baghouse pressure drop weekly. If the pressure drop falls out of

the normal operating range, specified by the manufacturer, corrective action shall be

taken within eight (8) hours to return the pressure drop to normal.

2. Check the cleaning sequence of the baghouse monthly.

3. Thoroughly inspect bags for leaks and wear quarterly.

4. Inspect every six (6) months all components that are not subject to wear or plugging,

including structural components, housing, ducts and hoods.

If leaks or abnormal conditions are detected the appropriate measures for remediation shall

be implemented within eight (8) hours. Bag replacement should be documented. Maintain a

written record of the inspection and any action resulting from the inspection. All instruments

and control equipment shall be calibrated, maintained, and operated according to the

manufacture specifications..

Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and

notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for

inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five

years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action,

report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be retained on site.

The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may be maintained on

microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by

§63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b))

(1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status

under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1))

(2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and

(§63.1355(b)(2))

(3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information

demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record

keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

• The permittee shall maintain a written or electronic record of all inspections and any action

resulting from the inspection. These records shall be made available immediately for

inspection to the Department of Natural Resources’ personnel upon request.

Reporting:

• The permittee shall comply with the reporting requirements for the performance test stated in

Permit Condition: PW007.

• As required by §63.10(d)(2), the owner or operator shall report the results of performance

tests as part of the notification of compliance status. (§63.1354(b)(1))

The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the

provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 92

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0390-002 through EU0400-002

10 CSR 10-2.030

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation:

The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of 42.387 lbs/hr from each clinker

cooler.

Monitoring:

The permittee shall comply with the monitoring requirements listed below:

• Baghouse operation and maintenance:

1. Check and document the baghouse pressure drop weekly. If the pressure drop falls out of

the normal operating range, specified by the manufacturer, corrective action shall be

taken within eight (8) hours to return the pressure drop to normal.

2. Check the cleaning sequence of the baghouse monthly.

3. Thoroughly inspect bags for leaks and wear quarterly.

4. Inspect every six (6) months all components that are not subject to wear or plugging,

including structural components, housing, ducts and hoods.

If leaks or abnormal conditions are detected the appropriate measures for remediation shall be

implemented within eight (8) hours. Bag replacement should be documented. Maintain a

written record of the inspection and any action resulting from the inspection. All instruments

and control equipment shall be calibrated, maintained, and operated according to the

manufacturer’s specifications.

Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain a written or electronic record of all inspections and any action

resulting from the inspection.

• The permittee shall retain the calculations showing compliance with 10 CSR 10-2.030.

• These records shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of

Natural Resources’ personnel upon request.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO

65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 93

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0390-003 through EU0400-003

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation:

No owner or operator shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from the clinker cooler

any gases which exhibit opacity greater than ten percent. (§63.1345(a)(2))

Performance Testing:

• The opacity exhibited during the period of the Method 5 performance test for particulate

matter required by §63.1349(b)(1)(i) shall be determined as required in §63.1349(b)(1)(v)

through (vi). (§63.1349(b)(1))

• Except as provided in §63.1349(b)(1)(vi), the opacity exhibited during the period of the

Method 5 performance tests required by §63.1349(b)(1)(i) shall be determined through the

use of a continuous opacity monitor (COM). The maximum six-minute average opacity

during the three Method 5 test runs shall be determined during each Method 5 test run,

and used to demonstrate initial compliance with the applicable opacity limits of

§63.1343(b)(2). (§63.1349(b)(1)(v))

• Each owner or operator of a clinker cooler using a fabric filter and if the control device

exhausts through a monovent, or if the use of a COM in accordance with the installation

specifications of Performance Specification 1 (PS-1) of appendix B to part 60 of this chapter

is not feasible, a test shall be conducted in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part

60 of this chapter during each Method 5 performance test required by §63.1349(b)(1)(i).

The maximum six-minute average opacity shall be determined during the three Method 5

test runs, and used to demonstrate initial compliance with the applicable opacity limits of

§63.1343(b)(2). (§63.1349(b)(1)(vi))

Monitoring:

• The owner or operator of a clinker cooler shall monitor opacity at each point where

emissions are vented from the clinker cooler in accordance with §63.1350(d)(1) through

(d)(3). §63.1350(d)

• Except as provide in §63.1350(d)(2), the owner or operator shall install, calibrate, maintain,

and continuously operate a COM located at the outlet of the clinker cooler PM control

device to continuously monitor the opacity. The COM shall be installed, maintained,

calibrated, and operated as required by subpart A, general provisions of this part, and

according to PS-1 of appendix B to part 60 of this chapter. (§63.1350(d)(1))

• The owner or operator of a clinker cooler using a fabric filter and if the fabric filter exhausts

through a monovent, or if the use of a COM in accordance with the installation

specifications of PS-1 of appendix B to part 60 of this chapter is not feasible, the owner or

operator must monitor opacity in accordance with §63.1350(d)(2)(i) through (ii).

(§63.1350(d)(2))

(1) Perform daily visual opacity observations of each stack in accordance with the

procedures of Method 9 of appendix A of part 60 of this chapter. The Method 9 test

shall be conducted while the affected source is operating at the highest load or capacity

level reasonably expected to occur within the day. The duration of the Method 9 test

shall be at least 30 minutes each day. (§63.1350(d)(2)(i))

(2) Use the Method 9 procedures to monitor and record the average opacity for each sixminute period during the test. (§63.1350(d)(2)(ii))
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 94

Project No. 2240-0030-014

• To remain in compliance, the opacity must be maintained such that the 6-minute average

opacity for any 6-minute block period does not exceed 10 percent. If the average opacity for

any 6-minute block period exceeds 10 percent, this shall constitute a violation of the

standard. (§63.1350(d)(3))

Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and

notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for

inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least

five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective

action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be

retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may

be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on

microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by

§63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b))

(1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status

under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1))

(2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and

(§63.1355(b)(2))

(3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information

demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record

keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

• The owner or operator of an affected source equipped with a continuous monitoring system

shall maintain all records required by §63.10(c). (§63.1355(c))

Reporting:

• As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the

opacity results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2))

• As required by §63.10(e)(2), the owner or operator of an affected source using a continuous

opacity monitoring system to determine opacity compliance during any performance test

required under §63.7 and described in §63.6(d)(6) shall report the results of the continuous

opacity monitoring system performance evaluation conducted under §63.8(e).

(§63.1354(b)(7))

• As required by §63.10(e)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source equipped with a

continuous emission monitor shall submit an excess emissions and continuous monitoring

system performance report for any event when the continuous monitoring system data

indicates the source is not in compliance with the applicable emission limitation or

operating parameter limit. (§63.1354(b)(8))

• If the total continuous monitoring system downtime for any CEM or any continuous

monitoring system (CMS) for the reporting period is ten percent or greater of the total

operating time for the reporting period, the owner or operator shall submit an excess

emissions and continuous monitoring performance report along with the summary report

(mentioned in PW003). (§63.1354(b)(10))

The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the

provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 95

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0390-004 through EU0400-004

10 CSR 10-2.060

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any

source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions

for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible

emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity.

Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures

contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is

operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions

are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For

emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity

standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks

after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this

period, then:

2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a

violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be

observed during this period, then:

3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to

weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in

an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA

Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer.

Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting:

1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units,

2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and

3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any

other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit

established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and

the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is

incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 96

Project No. 2240-0030-014

EU0410 through EU0470

EU0410 – Clinker Roll Crusher

EU0420 – Clinker Reclaim and Transfer Station (Unloading Mine or

Purchased Clinker to Silos)

EU0430 - Clinker Transfer from Roll Crusher to Silos (#7 Belt)

EU0440 – Clinker Silos

EU0450 – Clinker Loadout Station #1

EU0460 – Clinker Loadout Station #2

EU0470 – Gypsum Silos/Gypsum Transfer Conveyors

General Description: Clinker and Gypsum Handling: Systems.

Installed: 1952 - 1954

Control Devices: Fabric Filters

Manufacturer/Model #:

EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-26 through EP-30 & EP-32

Permit Condition EU0410-001 through EU0470-001

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation:

The owner or operator of each new or existing raw material, clinker, or finished product storage

bin; conveying system transfer point; bagging system; and bulk loading or unloading system

shall not cause to be discharged any gases from raw material, clinker, or finished product

storage bin; conveying system transfer point; bagging system; and bulk loading or unloading

system which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent. (§63.1348)

Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the raw material, clinker, or

finished product storage bin; conveying system transfer point; bagging system; and bulk

loading or unloading system opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9

of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The performance test shall be conducted under the

conditions that exist when the raw material, clinker, or finished product storage bin;

conveying system transfer point; bagging system; and bulk loading or unloading system is

operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The maximum

six-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to determine

whether the raw material, clinker, or finished product storage bin; conveying system transfer

point; bagging system; and bulk loading or unloading system is in initial compliance with the

standard. The duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be 3-hours (30 6-minute

averages), except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to 1-

hour if the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)):

(1) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i));

(2) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent for the first 1-hour period.

(§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five years.

(§63.1349(c))
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 97

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Monitoring:

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall

monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in

accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly 1-minute visible emissions test of each

affected source in accordance with Method 22 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The

test must be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests for any affected source,

the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semi-annually

for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual test, the

owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and

maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the

owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for

that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or

operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that

schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests.

(§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must

conduct a 6-minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of

this chapter. The Method 9 test must begin within one hour of any observation of visible

emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv))

Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and

notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for

inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five

years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action,

report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be retained on site.

The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may be maintained on

microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by

§63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b))

(1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status

under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1))

(2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and

(§63.1355(b)(2))

(3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information

demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record

keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

Reporting:

As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity

results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2))

The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the

provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 98

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0410-002 through EU0470-002

10 CSR 10-2.060

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any

source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions

for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible

emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity.

Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures

contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is

operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions

are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For

emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity

standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks after

permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period,

then:

2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a

violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be

observed during this period, then:

3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to

weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in

an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA

Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer.

Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting:

1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units,

2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and

3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any

other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit

established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and

the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is

incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 99

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0410-003 through EU0470-003

10 CSR 10-2.030

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation:

The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of :

• 48.43 lbs/hr from any of EU0410, EU0430, ;

• 42.97 lbs/hr from any of EU0420, EU0440, and 0450;

• 30.51 lbs/hr from EU0460; and

• 40.04 lbs/hr from EU0470

Monitoring:

None

Record Keeping:

None

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO

65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.

EU0480 through EU0490

EU0480 – Finish Mill #1 Feed Belt

EU0490 – Finish Mill #1 Weigh Hopper

General Description: Finish Mill #1 Associated Equipment

Installed: 1952

Control Device: Baghouse

Manufacturer/Model #: Nordberg

EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-34

Permit Condition EU0480-001 through EU0490-001

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation:

The owner or operator shall not cause to be discharged any gases from these affected sources

which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent. (§63.1348)

Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with these affected sources opacity

limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this

chapter. The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when these

affected sources are operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to

occur. The maximum six-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be

used to determine whether these affected sources are in initial compliance with the standard.

The duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be 3-hours (30 6-minute averages), except

that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to 1-hour if the conditions

of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)):
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 100

Project No. 2240-0030-014

(1) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i));

(2) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent for the first 1-hour period.

(§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five years.

(§63.1349(c))

Monitoring:

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall

monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in

accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly 1-minute visible emissions test of each affected

source in accordance with Method 22 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The test must

be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests for any affected source,

the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semi-annually for

that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual test, the owner

or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that

schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the

owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for

that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or

operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that

schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests.

(§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must

conduct a 6-minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of

this chapter. The Method 9 test must begin within one hour of any observation of visible

emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv))

Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and

notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for

inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five

years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action,

report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be retained on site.

The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may be maintained on

microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by

§63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b))

(1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status

under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1))

(2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and

(§63.1355(b)(2))

(3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information

demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping

or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

Reporting:

As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity

results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2))

The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the

provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 101

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0480-002 through EU0490-002

10 CSR 10-2.060

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any

source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions

for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible

emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity.

Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures

contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is

operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions

are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For

emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity

standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks

after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this

period, then:

2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a

violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be

observed during this period, then:

3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to

weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in

an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA

Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer.

Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting:

1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units,

2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and

3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any

other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit

established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and

the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is

incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 102

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0480-003 through EU0490-003

10 CSR 10-2.030

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation:

The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of 40.52 lbs/hr from any of the finish

mill #1 associated equipment.

Monitoring:

The permittee shall comply with the monitoring requirements listed below:

• Baghouse operation and maintenance:

1. Check and document the baghouse pressure drop weekly. If the pressure drop falls out of

the normal operating range, specified by the manufacturer, corrective action shall be

taken within eight (8) hours to return the pressure drop to normal.

2. Check the cleaning sequence of the baghouse monthly.

3. Thoroughly inspect bags for leaks and wear quarterly.

4. Inspect every six (6) months all components that are not subject to wear or plugging,

including structural components, housing, ducts and hoods.

If leaks or abnormal conditions are detected the appropriate measures for remediation shall be

implemented within eight (8) hours. Bag replacement should be documented. Maintain a

written record of the inspection and any action resulting from the inspection. All instruments

and control equipment shall be calibrated, maintained, and operated according to the

manufacturer’s specifications.

Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain a written or electronic record of all inspections and any action

resulting from the inspection.

• The permittee shall retain the calculations showing compliance with 10 CSR 10-2.030.

• These records shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of

Natural Resources’ personnel upon request.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO

65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 103

Project No. 2240-0030-014

EU0500 through EU0510

EU0510 - Finish Mill #1 Grinder

EU0520 - Finish Mill #1 Air Separator

General Description: Finish Mill # 1 Grinder and Air Separator

Installed: 1952

Control Device: Baghouse

Manufacturer/Model #: Nordberg

EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-34

Permit Condition EU0500-001 through EU0510-001

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation:

The owner or operator of each finish mill shall not cause to be discharged from the mill sweep

or air separator air pollution control devices any gases which exhibit opacity in excess of ten

percent. (§63.1347)

Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the finish mill opacity limit

by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter.

The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when the finish

mill is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The

maximum six-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to

determine whether the finish mill is in initial compliance with the standard. The duration

of the Method 9 performance test shall be 3-hours (30 6-minute averages), except that the

duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to 1-hour if the conditions of

§63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)):

(1) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i));

(2) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent for the first 1-hour period.

(§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five years.

(§63.1349(c))

Monitoring:

• The owner or operator of a finish mill shall monitor opacity by conducting daily visual

emissions observations of the mill sweep and air separator PMCDs of these affected

sources, in accordance with the procedures of Method 22 of appendix A of part 60 of this

chapter. The Method 22 test shall be conducted while the affected source is operating at

the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur within the day. The

duration of the Method 22 test shall be six minutes. If visible emissions are observed

during any Method 22 visible emissions test, the owner or operator must (§63.1350(e)):

(1) Initiate, within one-hour, the corrective actions specified in the site specific operating

and maintenance plan developed in accordance with §63.1350(a)(1) and (a)(2).

(§63.1350(e)(1))
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 104

Project No. 2240-0030-014

(2) Within 24 hours of the end of the Method 22 test in which visible emissions were

observed, conduct a visual opacity test of each stack from which visible emissions were

observed in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A of part 60 of this chapter. The

duration of the Method 9 test shall be thirty minutes. (§63.1350(e)(2))

Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and

notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for

inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least

five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective

action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be

retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may

be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on

microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by

§63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b))

(1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status

under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1))

(2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and

(§63.1355(b)(2))

(3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information

demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record

keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

Reporting:

As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity

results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2))

The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the

provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 105

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0500-002 through EU0510-002

10 CSR 10-2.060

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any

source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions

for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible

emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity.

Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures

contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is

operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions

are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For

emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity

standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks

after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this

period, then:

2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a

violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be

observed during this period, then:

3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to

weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in

an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA

Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer.

Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting:

1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units,

2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and

3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any

other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit

established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and

the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is

incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 106

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0500-003 through EU0510-003

10 CSR 10-2.030

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation:

The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of 40.52 lbs/hr either from the finish

mill or the aspirator.

Monitoring:

The permittee shall comply with the monitoring requirements listed below:

• Baghouse operation and maintenance:

1. Check and document the baghouse pressure drop weekly. If the pressure drop falls out of

the normal operating range, specified by the manufacturer, corrective action shall be

taken within eight (8) hours to return the pressure drop to normal.

2. Check the cleaning sequence of the baghouse monthly.

3. Thoroughly inspect bags for leaks and wear quarterly.

4. Inspect every six (6) months all components that are not subject to wear or plugging,

including structural components, housing, ducts and hoods.

If leaks or abnormal conditions are detected the appropriate measures for remediation shall be

implemented within eight (8) hours. Bag replacement should be documented. Maintain a

written record of the inspection and any action resulting from the inspection. All instruments

and control equipment shall be calibrated, maintained, and operated according to the

manufacturer’s specifications.

Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain a written or electronic record of all inspections and any action

resulting from the inspection.

• The permittee shall retain the calculations showing compliance with 10 CSR 10-2.030.

• These records shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of

Natural Resources’ personnel upon request.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO

65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 107

Project No. 2240-0030-014

EU0520 through EU0530

EU0520 – Finish Mill #2 Feed Belt

EU0530 – Finish Mill #2 Weigh Hopper

EU0540 – Finish Mill Fringe Tank

General Description: Finish Mill #2 Associated Equipment

Installed: 1954

Finish Mill Fringe Tank installed 1998

Control Device: Baghouse

Manufacturer/Model #: Nordberg

EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-35 & 35A

Permit Condition EU0520-001 through EU0540-001

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation:

The owner or operator shall not cause to be discharged any gases from these affected sources

which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent. (§63.1348)

Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with these affected sources

opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of

this chapter. The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist

when these affected sources are operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably

expected to occur. The maximum six-minute average opacity exhibited during the test

period shall be used to determine whether these affected sources are in initial compliance

with the standard. The duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be 3-hours (30 6-

minute averages), except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be

reduced to 1-hour if the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply

(§63.1349(b)(2)):

(1) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i));

(2) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent for the first 1-hour period.

(§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five years.

(§63.1349(c))

Monitoring:

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall

monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in

accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly 1-minute visible emissions test of each

affected source in accordance with Method 22 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The

test must be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests for any affected source,

the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semi-annually
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 108

Project No. 2240-0030-014

for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual test, the

owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and

maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the

owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for

that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or

operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that

schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests.

(§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must

conduct a 6-minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of

this chapter. The Method 9 test must begin within one hour of any observation of visible

emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv))

Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and

notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for

inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least

five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective

action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be

retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may

be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on

microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by

§63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b))

(1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status

under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1))

(2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and

(§63.1355(b)(2))

(3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information

demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record

keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

Reporting:

As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity

results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2))

The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the

provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 109

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0520-002 through EU0540-002

10 CSR 10-2.060

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any

source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions

for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible

emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity.

Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures

contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is

operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions

are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For

emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity

standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks

after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this

period, then:

2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a

violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be

observed during this period, then:

3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to

weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in

an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA

Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer.

Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting:

1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units,

2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and

3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any

other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit

established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and

the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is

incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 110

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0520-003 through EU0540-003

10 CSR 10-2.030

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation:

The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of 41.57 lbs/hr from any of the finish

mill #2 associated equipment.

Monitoring:

The permittee shall comply with the monitoring requirements listed below:

• Baghouse operation and maintenance:

1. Check and document the baghouse pressure drop weekly. If the pressure drop falls out of

the normal operating range, specified by the manufacturer, corrective action shall be

taken within eight (8) hours to return the pressure drop to normal.

2. Check the cleaning sequence of the baghouse monthly.

3. Thoroughly inspect bags for leaks and wear quarterly.

4. Inspect every six (6) months all components that are not subject to wear or plugging,

including structural components, housing, ducts and hoods.

If leaks or abnormal conditions are detected the appropriate measures for remediation shall be

implemented within eight (8) hours. Bag replacement should be documented. Maintain a

written record of the inspection and any action resulting from the inspection. All instruments

and control equipment shall be calibrated, maintained, and operated according to the

manufacturer’s specifications.

Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain a written or electronic record of all inspections and any action

resulting from the inspection.

• The permittee shall retain the calculations showing compliance with 10 CSR 10-2.030.

• These records shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of

Natural Resources’ personnel upon request.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO

65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 111

Project No. 2240-0030-014

EU0550 through EU0560

EU0550 - Finish Mill #2 Grinder

EU0560 - Finish Mill #2 Air Separator

General Description: Finish Mill # 1 Grinder and Air Separator

Installed: 1954

Control Device: Baghouse

Manufacturer/Model #: Nordberg

EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-35

Permit Condition EU0550-001 through EU0560-001

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation:

The owner or operator of each finish mill shall not cause to be discharged from the mill sweep

or air separator air pollution control devices any gases which exhibit opacity in excess of ten

percent. (§63.1347)

Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the finish mill opacity limit

by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter.

The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when the finish

mill is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The

maximum six-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to

determine whether the finish mill is in initial compliance with the standard. The duration

of the Method 9 performance test shall be 3-hours (30 6-minute averages), except that the

duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to 1-hour if the conditions of

§63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)):

(1) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i));

(2) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent for the first 1-hour period.

(§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five years.

(§63.1349(c))

Monitoring:

• The owner or operator of a finish mill shall monitor opacity by conducting daily visual

emissions observations of the mill sweep and air separator PMCDs of these affected

sources, in accordance with the procedures of Method 22 of appendix A of part 60 of this

chapter. The Method 22 test shall be conducted while the affected source is operating at

the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur within the day. The

duration of the Method 22 test shall be six minutes. If visible emissions are observed

during any Method 22 visible emissions test, the owner or operator must (§63.1350(e)):

1) Initiate, within one-hour, the corrective actions specified in the site specific operating

and maintenance plan developed in accordance with §63.1350(a)(1) and (a)(2).

(§63.1350(e)(1))
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 112

Project No. 2240-0030-014

2) Within 24 hours of the end of the Method 22 test in which visible emissions were

observed, conduct a visual opacity test of each stack from which visible emissions were

observed in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A of part 60 of this chapter. The

duration of the Method 9 test shall be thirty minutes. (§63.1350(e)(2))

Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and

notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for

inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least

five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective

action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be

retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may

be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on

microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by

§63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b))

(1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status

under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1))

(2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and

(§63.1355(b)(2))

(3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information

demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record

keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

Reporting:

As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity

results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2))

The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the

provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 113

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0550-002 through EU0560-002

10 CSR 10-2.060

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any

source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions

for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible

emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity.

Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures

contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is

operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions

are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For

emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity

standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks

after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this

period, then:

2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a

violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be

observed during this period, then:

3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to

weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in

an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA

Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer.

Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting:

1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units,

2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and

3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any

other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit

established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and

the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is

incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 114

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0550-003 through EU0560-003

10 CSR 10-2.030

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation:

The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of 41.57 lbs/hr either from the finish

mill or the aspirator.

Monitoring:

The permittee shall comply with the monitoring requirements listed below:

• Baghouse operation and maintenance:

1. Check and document the baghouse pressure drop weekly. If the pressure drop falls out of

the normal operating range, specified by the manufacturer, corrective action shall be

taken within eight (8) hours to return the pressure drop to normal.

2. Check the cleaning sequence of the baghouse monthly.

3. Thoroughly inspect bags for leaks and wear quarterly.

4. Inspect every six (6) months all components that are not subject to wear or plugging,

including structural components, housing, ducts and hoods.

If leaks or abnormal conditions are detected the appropriate measures for remediation shall be

implemented within eight (8) hours. Bag replacement should be documented. Maintain a

written record of the inspection and any action resulting from the inspection. All instruments

and control equipment shall be calibrated, maintained, and operated according to the

manufacturer’s specifications.

Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain a written or electronic record of all inspections and any action

resulting from the inspection.

• The permittee shall retain the calculations showing compliance with 10 CSR 10-2.030.

• These records shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of

Natural Resources’ personnel upon request.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO

65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 115

Project No. 2240-0030-014

EU0570 through EU0580

EU0570 – Finish Mill #3 Feed Belt (Belt 12A)

EU0580 – Finish Mill #3 Weigh Hopper

General Description: Finish Mill #3 Associated Equipment

Installed: 1984

Control Device: Baghouse

Manufacturer/Model #: Nordberg

EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-33 & EP-37

Permit Condition EU0570-001 through EU0580-001

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation:

The owner or operator shall not cause to be discharged any gases from these affected sources

which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent. (§63.1348)

Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with these affected sources

opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of

this chapter. The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist

when these affected sources are operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably

expected to occur. The maximum six-minute average opacity exhibited during the test

period shall be used to determine whether these affected sources are in initial compliance

with the standard. The duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be 3-hours (30 6-

minute averages), except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be

reduced to 1-hour if the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply

(§63.1349(b)(2)):

(1) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i));

(2) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent for the first 1-hour period.

(§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five years.

(§63.1349(c))

Monitoring:

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall

monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in

accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly 1-minute visible emissions test of each

affected source in accordance with Method 22 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The

test must be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests for any affected source,

the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semi-annually

for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual test, the

owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and

maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 116

Project No. 2240-0030-014

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the

owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for

that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or

operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that

schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests.

(§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must

conduct a 6-minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of

this chapter. The Method 9 test must begin within one hour of any observation of visible

emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv))

Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and

notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for

inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least

five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective

action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be

retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may

be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on

microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by

§63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b))

(1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status

under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1))

(2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and

(§63.1355(b)(2))

(3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information

demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record

keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

Reporting:

As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity

results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2))

The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the

provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 117

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0570-002 through EU0580-002

10 CSR 10-2.060

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any

source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions

for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible

emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity.

Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures

contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is

operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions

are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For

emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity

standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks

after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this

period, then:

2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a

violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be

observed during this period, then:

3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to

weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in

an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA

Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer.

Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting:

1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units,

2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and

3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any

other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit

established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and

the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is

incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 118

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0570-003 through EU0580-003

10 CSR 10-2.030

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation:

The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of 39.96 lbs/hr from any of the finish

mill #3 associated equipment.

Monitoring:

The permittee shall comply with the monitoring requirements listed below:

• Baghouse operation and maintenance:

1. Check and document the baghouse pressure drop weekly. If the pressure drop falls out of

the normal operating range, specified by the manufacturer, corrective action shall be

taken within eight (8) hours to return the pressure drop to normal.

2. Check the cleaning sequence of the baghouse monthly.

3. Thoroughly inspect bags for leaks and wear quarterly.

4. Inspect every six (6) months all components that are not subject to wear or plugging,

including structural components, housing, ducts and hoods.

If leaks or abnormal conditions are detected the appropriate measures for remediation shall be

implemented within eight (8) hours. Bag replacement should be documented. Maintain a

written record of the inspection and any action resulting from the inspection. All instruments

and control equipment shall be calibrated, maintained, and operated according to the

manufacturer’s specifications.

Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain a written or electronic record of all inspections and any action

resulting from the inspection.

• The permittee shall retain the calculations showing compliance with 10 CSR 10-2.030.

• These records shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of

Natural Resources’ personnel upon request.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO

65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 119

Project No. 2240-0030-014

EU0590 through EU0600

EU0590 - Finish Mill #3 Grinder

EU0600 - Finish Mill #3 Air Separator

General Description: Finish Mill # 1 Grinder and Air Separator

Installed: 1984

Control Device: Baghouse

Manufacturer/Model #: Nordberg

EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-37

Permit Condition EU0590-001 through EU0600-001

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation:

The owner or operator of each finish mill shall not cause to be discharged from the mill sweep

or air separator air pollution control devices any gases which exhibit opacity in excess of ten

percent. (§63.1347)

Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the finish mill opacity limit

by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter.

The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when the finish

mill is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The

maximum six-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to

determine whether the finish mill is in initial compliance with the standard. The duration

of the Method 9 performance test shall be 3-hours (30 6-minute averages), except that the

duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to 1-hour if the conditions of

§63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)):

(1) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i));

(2) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent for the first 1-hour period.

(§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five years.

(§63.1349(c))

Monitoring:

• The owner or operator of a finish mill shall monitor opacity by conducting daily visual

emissions observations of the mill sweep and air separator PMCDs of these affected

sources, in accordance with the procedures of Method 22 of appendix A of part 60 of this

chapter. The Method 22 test shall be conducted while the affected source is operating at

the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur within the day. The

duration of the Method 22 test shall be six minutes. If visible emissions are observed

during any Method 22 visible emissions test, the owner or operator must (§63.1350(e)):

(1) Initiate, within one-hour, the corrective actions specified in the site specific operating

and maintenance plan developed in accordance with §63.1350(a)(1) and (a)(2).

(§63.1350(e)(1))
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 120

Project No. 2240-0030-014

(2) Within 24 hours of the end of the Method 22 test in which visible emissions were

observed, conduct a visual opacity test of each stack from which visible emissions were

observed in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A of part 60 of this chapter. The

duration of the Method 9 test shall be thirty minutes. (§63.1350(e)(2))

Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and

notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for

inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least

five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective

action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be

retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may

be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on

microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by

§63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b))

(1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status

under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1))

(2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and

(§63.1355(b)(2))

(3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information

demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record

keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

Reporting:

As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity

results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2))

The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the

provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 121

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0590-002 through EU0600-002

10 CSR 10-2.060

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any

source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions

for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible

emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity.

Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures

contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is

operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions

are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For

emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity

standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks

after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this

period, then:

2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a

violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be

observed during this period, then:

3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to

weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in

an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA

Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer.

Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting:

1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units,

2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and

3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any

other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit

established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and

the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is

incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 122

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0590-003 through EU0600-003

10 CSR 10-2.030

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation:

The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of 39.96 lbs/hr either from the finish

mill or the aspirator.

Monitoring:

The permittee shall comply with the monitoring requirements listed below:

• Baghouse operation and maintenance:

1. Check and document the baghouse pressure drop weekly. If the pressure drop falls out of

the normal operating range, specified by the manufacturer, corrective action shall be

taken within eight (8) hours to return the pressure drop to normal.

2. Check the cleaning sequence of the baghouse monthly.

3. Thoroughly inspect bags for leaks and wear quarterly.

4. Inspect every six (6) months all components that are not subject to wear or plugging,

including structural components, housing, ducts and hoods.

If leaks or abnormal conditions are detected the appropriate measures for remediation shall be

implemented within eight (8) hours. Bag replacement should be documented. Maintain a

written record of the inspection and any action resulting from the inspection. All instruments

and control equipment shall be calibrated, maintained, and operated according to the

manufacturer’s specifications.

Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain a written or electronic record of all inspections and any action

resulting from the inspection.

• The permittee shall retain the calculations showing compliance with 10 CSR 10-2.030.

• These records shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of

Natural Resources’ personnel upon request.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO

65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 123

Project No. 2240-0030-014

EU0610 through EU0690

EU0610 – Cement Storage Transfer Point (EP-38)

EU0620 – Pneumatic Cement Conveyor #1 (EP-39)

EU0630 - Pneumatic Cement Conveyor #2 (EP-40)

EU0640 – Cement Unloading Silos – Truck #1 (EP-41)

EU0650 – Cement Unloading Silos – Truck #2 (EP-42)

EU0660 – Barge Loadout Station (EP-43)

EU0670 – Railcar Loadout Station (EP-44)

EU0680 – Truck Loadout Station #1 (EP-45)

EU0690 – Truck Loadout Station #2 (EP-47)

General Description: Cement Handling and Loadout: Cement from the finish milling circuits

is pneumatically conveyed to cement storage silos. From the storage

silos, cement can be pneumatically conveyed to either barge, rail or

truck loadout facilities.

Installed: 1937 -1960

Control Device: Baghouse

Manufacturer/Model #:

EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-38 through EP-45, and EP-47

Permit Condition EU0610-001 through EU0690-001

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation:

The owner or operator of each finished product storage bin; conveying system transfer point;

bagging system; and bulk loading or unloading system shall not cause to be discharged any

gases from finished product storage bin; conveying system transfer point; bagging system; and

bulk loading or unloading system which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent. (§63.1348)

Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the finished product

storage bin; conveying system transfer point; bagging system; and bulk loading or

unloading system opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of

appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The performance test shall be conducted under the

conditions that exist when the finished product storage bin; conveying system transfer

point; bagging system; and bulk loading or unloading system is operating at the highest

load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The maximum six-minute average

opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to determine whether the finished

product storage bin; conveying system transfer point; bagging system; and bulk loading or

unloading system is in initial compliance with the standard. The duration of the Method 9

performance test shall be 3-hours (30 6-minute averages), except that the duration of the

Method 9 performance test may be reduced to 1-hour if the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i)

through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)):

(1) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i));
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 124

Project No. 2240-0030-014

(2) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent for the first 1-hour period.

(§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five years.

(§63.1349(c))

Monitoring:

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall

monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in

accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly 1-minute visible emissions test of each

affected source in accordance with Method 22 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The

test must be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests for any affected source,

the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semi-annually

for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual test, the

owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and

maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the

owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for

that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or

operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that

schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests.

(§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must

conduct a 6-minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of

this chapter. The Method 9 test must begin within one hour of any observation of visible

emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv))

Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and

notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for

inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least

five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective

action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be

retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may

be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on

microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by

§63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b))

(1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status

under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1))

(2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and

(§63.1355(b)(2))

(3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information

demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record

keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

Reporting:

As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity

results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2))

The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the

provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 125

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0610-002 through EU0690-002

10 CSR 10-2.060

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

10 CSR 10-6.220

Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation:

No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any

source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions

for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible

emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity.

Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures

contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is

operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions

are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For

emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity

standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained:

1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks

after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this

period, then:

2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a

violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be

observed during this period, then:

3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to

weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in

an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA

Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer.

Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting:

1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units,

2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and

3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any

other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit

established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance.

10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and

the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is

incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 126

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0610-003 through EU0690-003

10 CSR 10-2.030

Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation:

The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of :

• 51.07 lbs/hr from EU0610; and

• 44.39 lbs/hr from any of EU0620 through EU0690..

Monitoring:

None

Record Keeping:

None

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO

65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.

EU0700

Ethanolamine Storage Tank

General Description: 50,300 gallon ethanolamine fixed roof storage tank

Installed: 1988

Manufacturer/Model #:

EIQ Reference # (1988): EP-51

Permit Condition EU0700-001

10 CSR 10-6.070

New Source Performance Regulations

40 CFR Part 60 Subpart Kb

Standards of Performance for Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessels (Including Petroleum

Liquid Storage Vessels) for Which Construction, Reconstruction, or Modification

Commenced After July 23, 1984

Emission Limitation:

Except as specified in paragraphs (a) and (b) of §60.116b, vessels either with a capacity greater

than or equal to 151 m3 storing a liquid with a maximum true vapor pressure less than 3.5 kPa

or with a capacity greater than or equal to 75 m3 but less than 151 m3 storing a liquid with a

maximum true vapor pressure less than 15.0 kPa are exempt from the General Provisions (part

60, subpart A) and from the provisions of this subpart. [§60.110b(c)]

Monitoring:

The owner or operator of each storage vessel as specified in §60.110b(a) shall keep readily

accessible records showing the dimension of the storage vessel and an analysis showing the

capacity of the storage vessel. [§60.116b(b)]

Record Keeping:

The owner or operator shall keep copies of all records required by this section, except for the

record required by §60.116b(b) of this section, for at least 2 years. The record required by

§60.116b(b) of this section will be kept for the life of the source. [§60.116b(a)]

Reporting:

None
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 127

Project No. 2240-0030-014

EU0710

8,000 Gallon Gasoline RVP-13 Underground Storage Tank

General Description: 8,000-gallon gasoline RVP-13 underground storage tank equipped

with submerged fill pipe and vapor recovery system.

Installed: 1990

Manufacturer/Model #: Owens Corning

EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-52

Permit Condition EU0710-001

10 CSR 10-2.260

Control of Petroleum Liquid Storage, Loading and transfer

Emission Limitation:

The permittee shall not cause or permit the transfer of gasoline from any delivery vessel into any

stationary storage tank with a capacity greater than 2000 gallons unless the storage tank is

equipped with a submerged fill pipe and a vapor recovery system. The vapor recovery system

shall collect no less than 90 percent by volume of the volume of the vapors displaced from the

stationary storage tank.

Monitoring:

The permittee shall monitor the vapor recovery system and the gasoline loading equipment in a

manner that prevents:

• Gauge pressure from exceeding 4500 pascals (18 in. of water) in the delivery vessel

• A reading equal to or greater than 100% of the lower explosive limit (LEL, measured as

propane) at 2.5 centimeters from all points on the perimeter of a potential leak source during

loading or transfer operations

• Visible liquid leaks during loading or transfer operations

Record Keeping:

Keep records documenting the number of delivery vessels unloaded and their owners. Also keep

records of routine and unscheduled maintenance and repairs and of all results of tests

conducted. Records shall be kept for five (5) years and made available upon request.

Reporting:

None
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 128

Project No. 2240-0030-014

EU0720

12,000 Gallon #2 Fuel (Diesel) Oil Underground Storage Tank

General Description: 12,000-gallon diesel (#2)fuel underground storage tank .

Installed: 1990

Manufacturer/Model #: Owens Corning

EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-52

Permit Condition EU0720-001

10 CSR 10-6.070

New Source Performance Regulations

40 CFR Part 60 Subpart Kb

Standards of Performance for Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessels (Including Petroleum

Liquid Storage Vessels) for Which Construction, Reconstruction, or Modification

Commenced After July 23, 1984

Emission Limitation:

Except as specified in paragraphs (a) and (b) of §60.116b, storage vessels either with design

capacity less than 75 m3 are exempt from the General Provisions (part 60, subpart A) and from

the provisions of this subpart. [§60.110b(b)].

Monitoring:

The owner or operator of each storage vessel as specified in §60.110b(a) shall keep readily

accessible records showing the dimension of the storage vessel and an analysis showing the

capacity of the storage vessel. [§60.116b(b)]

Record Keeping:

The owner or operator shall keep copies of all records required by this section, except for the

record required by §60.116b(b) of this section, for at least 2 years. The record required by

§60.116b(b) of this section will be kept for the life of the source. [§60.116b(a)]

Reporting:

None
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 129

Project No. 2240-0030-014

EU0730

Safety-Kleen Parts Washers (Degreasing Units)

General Description: Three (3) Parts Washers: Cold cleaning units and use Stoddard

solvent.

Manufacturer/Model #: Safety-Kleen

EIQ Reference # (1998) EP-57

Permit Condition EU0730-001

10 CSR 10-2.210

Control of Emissions from Solvent Metal Cleaning

Emission Limitation:

The permittee shall comply with the operating procedures and operator training requirements as

specified in this rule unless the equipment conforms to the specifications of this rule.

Monitoring:

The permittee shall monitor the throughputs of the solvents monthly and maintain material

safety data sheets of the cleanup solvents used at the installation.

Record Keeping:

The permittee shall keep monthly inventory records of solvent types and amounts purchased

and solvent consumed for a period of five (5) years. The records shall include all types and

amounts of solvent containing waste material transferred to either a contract reclamation service

or to a disposal installation and all amounts distilled on the premises. The record also shall

include maintenance and repair logs.

Reporting:

The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedence of 10 CSR 10-2.210

demonstrated by the appropriate record keeping forms.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 130

Project No. 2240-0030-014

IV. Core Permit Requirements

The installation shall comply with each of the following emission limitations. Consult the

appropriate sections in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and Code of State

Regulations (CSR) for the full text of the applicable requirements.

10 CSR 10-6.050, Start-up, Shutdown and Malfunction Conditions

The permittee shall submit the following information to the director not later

than fifteen (15) days after receipt of the notice of excess emissions.

(a.) Name and location of installation;

(b.) Name and telephone number of person responsible for the installation;

(c.) The identity of the equipment causing the excess emissions;

(d.) The time and duration of the period of excess emissions.;

(e.) The cause of the excess emissions;

(f.) The type of air contaminant involved;

(g.) A best estimate of the magnitude of the excess emissions expressed in

the units of the applicable emission control regulation and the operating

data and calculations used in estimating the magnitude;

(h.) The measures taken to mitigate the extent and duration of the excess

emissions; and

(i.) The measures taken to remedy the situation which caused the excess

emissions and the measures taken or planned to prevent the recurrence

of these situations.

10 CSR 10-6.060, Construction Permits Required

The permittee shall not commence construction, modification, or major

modification of any installation subject to this rule, begin operation after that

construction, modification, or major modification, or begin operation of any

installation which has been shut down longer than five (5) years without first

obtaining a permit from the permitting authority.

10 CSR 10-6.065, Operating Permits

The permittee shall file for renewal of this operating permit no sooner than

eighteen months, nor later than six months, prior to the expiration date of

this operating permit. The permittee shall retain the most current operating

permit issued to this installation on-site and shall immediately make such

permit available to any Missouri Department of Natural Resources personnel

upon request.

10 CSR 10-6.110, Submission of Emission Data, Emission Fees and Process

Information

The permittee shall complete and submit an Emission Inventory

Questionnaire (EIQ) in accordance with the requirements outlined in this

rule.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 131

Project No. 2240-0030-014

10 CSR 10-6.130, Controlling Emissions During Episodes of High Air

Pollution Potential

This rule specifies the conditions that establish an air pollution alert

(yellow/red), watch or emergency and the associated procedures and

emissions reduction objectives for dealing with each. The permittee shall

submit an appropriate emergency plan if required by the Director.

10 CSR 10-6.150, Circumvention

The permittee shall not cause or permit the installation or use of any device

or any other means which, without resulting in reduction in the total amount

of air contaminant emitted, conceals or dilutes an emission or air

contaminant which violates a rule of the Missouri Air Conservation

Commission.

10 CSR 10-6.180, Measurement of Emissions of Air Contaminants

(a.) The director may require any person responsible for the source of

emission of air contaminants to make or have made tests to determine

the quantity or nature, or both, of emission of air contaminants from the

source. The director may specify testing methods to be used in

accordance with good professional practice. The director may observe

the testing. All tests shall be performed by qualified personnel.

(b.) The director may conduct tests of emissions of air contaminants from

any source. Upon request of the director, the person responsible for the

source to be tested shall provide necessary ports in stacks or ducts and

other safe and proper sampling and testing facilities, exclusive of

instruments and sensing devices as may be necessary for proper

determination of the emission of air contaminants.

(c.) The director shall be given a copy of the test results in writing and signed

by the person responsible for the tests.

10 CSR 10-2.070, Restriction of Emission of Odors

No person may cause, permit or allow the emission of odorous matter in

concentrations and frequencies or for durations that odor can be perceived

when one (1) volume of odorous air is diluted with seven (7) volumes of odorfree air for two (2) separate trials not less than fifteen (15) minutes apart

within the period of one (1) hour.

This requirement is not federally enforceable.

10 CSR 10-2.100, Open Burning Restrictions

(a.) The permittee shall not conduct, cause, permit or allow a salvage

operation, the disposal of trade wastes or burning of refuse by open

burning.

(b.) Exception - Open burning of trade waste or vegetation may be permitted

only when it can be shown that open burning is the only feasible method

of disposal or an emergency exists which requires open burning.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 132

Project No. 2240-0030-014

(c.) Any person intending to engage in open burning shall file a request to do

so with the director. The request shall include the following:

(1.) The name, address and telephone number of the person submitting

the application; The type of business or activity involved; A

description of the proposed equipment and operating practices, the

type, quantity and composition of trade wastes and expected

composition and amount of air contaminants to be released to the

atmosphere where known;

(2.) The schedule of burning operations;

(3.) The exact location where open burning will be used to dispose of the

trade wastes;

(4.) Reasons why no method other than open burning is feasible; and

(5.) Evidence that the proposed open burning has been approved by the

fire control authority which has jurisdiction.

(d.) Upon approval of the open burning permit application by the director,

the person may proceed with the operation under the terms of the open

burning permit. Be aware that such approval shall not exempt Lafarge

Corporation from the provisions of any other law, ordinance or

regulation.

(e.) The permittee shall maintain files with letters from the director approving

the open burning operation and previous DNR inspection reports.

.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 133

Project No. 2240-0030-014

V. General Permit Requirements

Permit Duration

10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)1.B.

This permit is issued for a term of five (5) years, commencing on the date of issuance. This

permit will expire at the end of this period unless renewed.

General Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements

10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)1.C

I) Record Keeping

A) All required monitoring data and support information shall be retained for a period of

at least five (5) years from the date of the monitoring sample, measurement, report or

application.

B) Copies of all current operating and construction permits issued to this installation

shall be kept on-site for as long as the permits are in effect. Copies of these permits

shall be made immediately available to any Missouri Department of Natural

Resources’ personnel upon request.

II) Reporting

A) The permittee shall submit a report of all required monitoring by:

1) October 1st for monitoring which covers the January through June time period,

and

2) April 1st for monitoring which covers the July through December time period.

3) Exception: Monitoring requirements which require reporting more frequently than

semi annually shall report no later than 30 days after the end of the calendar

quarter in which the measurements were taken.

B) Each report must identify any deviations from emission limitations, monitoring,

record keeping, reporting, or any other requirements of the permit.

C) All reports shall be submitted to the Air Pollution Control Program, Operating Permit

Unit, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

D) Submit supplemental reports as required or as needed. Supplemental reports are

required no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of any applicable rule,

regulation or other restriction. All reports of deviations shall identify the cause or

probable cause of the deviations and any corrective actions or preventative measures

taken.

1) Notice of any deviation resulting from an emergency (or upset) condition as

defined in paragraph (6)(C)7 of 10 CSR 10-6.065 (Emergency Provisions) shall be

submitted to the permitting authority either verbally or in writing within two (2)

working days after the date on which the emission limitation is exceeded due to

the emergency, if you wish to assert an affirmative defense. The affirmative

defense of emergency shall be demonstrated through properly signed,

contemporaneous operating logs, or other relevant evidence that indicate an

emergency occurred and that you can identify the cause(s) of the emergency. The

permitted installation must show that it was operated properly at the time and

that during the period of the emergency the permittee took all reasonable steps to

minimize levels of emissions that exceeded the emission standards or

requirements in the permit. The notice must contain a description of the
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 134

Project No. 2240-0030-014

emergency, the steps taken to mitigate emissions, and the corrective actions

taken.

2) Any deviation that poses an imminent and substantial danger to public health,

safety or the environment shall be reported as soon as practicable.

3) Any other deviations identified in the permit as requiring more frequent reporting

than the permittee's semiannual report shall be reported on the schedule specified

in the permit.

E) Every report submitted shall be certified by the responsible official, except that, if a

report of a deviation must be submitted within ten (10) days after the deviation, the

report may be submitted without a certification if the report is resubmitted with an

appropriate certification within ten (10) days after that, together with any corrected or

supplemental information required concerning the deviation.

F) The permittee may request confidential treatment of information submitted in any

report of deviation.

G) These supplemental reports shall be submitted to the Air Pollution Control Program,

Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102 no later than ten (10)

days after any exceedance of any applicable rule, regulation, or other restriction.

Risk Management Plans Under Section 112(r)

10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)1.D.

The permittee shall comply with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 68, Accidental Release

Prevention Requirements. If the permittee has more than a threshold quantity of a

regulated substance in process, as determined by 40 CFR Section 68.115, the permittee

shall submit a Risk Management Plan in accordance with 40 CFR Part 68 no later than the

latest of the following dates:

1) June 21, 1999;

2) Three (3) years after the date on which a regulated substance is first listed under 40

CFR Section 68.130; or

3) The date on which a regulated substance is first present above a threshold quantity in

a process.

Severability Clause

10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)1.F.

In the event of a successful challenge to any part of this permit, all uncontested permit

conditions shall continue to be in force.

General Requirements

10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)1.G

1) The permittee must comply with all of the terms and conditions of this permit. Any

noncompliance with a permit condition constitutes a violation and is grounds for

enforcement action, permit termination, permit revocation and re-issuance, permit

modification or denial of a permit renewal application.

2) The permittee may not use as a defense in an enforcement action that it would have

been necessary for the permittee to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to

maintain compliance with the conditions of the permit.

3) The permit may be modified, revoked, reopened, reissued or terminated for cause.

Except as provided for minor permit modifications, the filing of an application or request
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 135

Project No. 2240-0030-014

for a permit modification, revocation and re-issuance, or termination, or the filing of a

notification of planned changes or anticipated noncompliance, will not stay any permit

condition.

4) This permit does not convey any property rights of any sort, nor grant any exclusive

privilege.

5) The permittee shall furnish to the Air Pollution Control Program, upon receipt of a

written request and within a reasonable time, any information that the Air Pollution

Control Program reasonably may require to determine whether cause exists for

modifying, reopening, reissuing or revoking the permit or to determine compliance with

the permit. Upon request, the permittee also shall furnish to the Air Pollution Control

Program copies of records required to be kept by the permittee. The permittee may

make a claim of confidentiality for any information or records submitted pursuant to 10

CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)1.

Incentive Programs Not Requiring Permit Revisions

10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)1.H.

No permit revision will be required for any installation changes made under any approved

economic incentive, marketable permit, emissions trading, or other similar programs or

processes provided for in this permit.

Title VI

I) The permittee shall comply with the standards for labeling of products using ozonedepleting substances pursuant to 40 CFR Part 82, Subpart E:

A) All containers in which a class I or class II substance is stored or transported, all

products containing a class I substance, and all products directly manufactured with

a class I substance must bear the required warning statement if it is being

introduced into interstate commerce pursuant to §82.106.

B) The placement of the required warning statement must comply with the requirements

pursuant to §82.108.

C) The form of the label bearing the required warning statement must comply with the

requirements pursuant to §82.110.

D) No person may modify, remove, or interfere with the required warning statement

except as described in §82.112.

II) The permittee shall comply with the standards for recycling and emissions reduction

pursuant to 40 CFR part 82, Subpart F, except as provided for motor vehicle air

conditioners (MVACs) in Subpart B:

A) Persons opening appliances for maintenance, service, repair, or disposal must comply

with the required practices pursuant to §82.156.

B) Equipment used during the maintenance, service, repair, or disposal of appliances

must comply with the standards for recycling and recovery equipment pursuant to

§82.158.

C) Persons performing maintenance, service, repair, or disposal of appliances must be

certified by an approved technician certification program pursuant to §82.161.

D) Persons disposing of small appliances, MVACs, and MVAC-like appliances must

comply with record keeping requirements pursuant to §82.166. ("MVAC-like"

appliance as defined at §82.152).

E) Persons owning commercial or industrial process refrigeration equipment must

comply with the leak repair requirements pursuant to §82.156.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 136

Project No. 2240-0030-014

F) Owners/operators of appliances normally containing 50 or more pounds of

refrigerant must keep records of refrigerant purchased and added to such appliances

pursuant to §82.166.

III)If the permittee manufactures, transforms, imports, or exports a class I or class II

substance, the permittee is subject to all the requirements as specified in 40 CFR part

82, Subpart A, Production and Consumption Controls.

IV)If the permittee performs a service on motor (fleet) vehicles when this service involves

ozone-depleting substance refrigerant (or regulated substitute substance) in the motor

vehicle air conditioner (MVAC), the permittee is subject to all the applicable

requirements as specified in 40 CFR part 82, Subpart B, Servicing of Motor Vehicle Air

conditioners. The term "motor vehicle" as used in Subpart B does not include a vehicle

in which final assembly of the vehicle has not been completed. The term "MVAC" as

used in Subpart B does not include the air-tight sealed refrigeration system used as

refrigerated cargo, or system used on passenger buses using HCFC-22 refrigerant.

The permittee shall be allowed to switch from any ozone-depleting substance to any

alternative that is listed in the Significant New Alternatives Program (SNAP) promulgated

pursuant to 40 CFR part 82, Subpart G, Significant New Alternatives Policy Program.

Federal Only - 40 CFR part 82

Compliance Requirements

10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)3.

I) Any document (including reports) required to be submitted under this permit shall

contain a certification signed by the responsible official.

II) Upon presentation of credentials and other documents as may be required by law, the

permittee shall allow authorized officials of the Missouri Department of Natural

Resources, or their authorized agents, to perform the following (subject to the

installation’s right to seek confidential treatment of information submitted to, or

obtained by, the Air Pollution Control Program):

A) Enter upon the premises where a permitted installation is located or an emissionsrelated activity is conducted, or where records must be kept under the conditions of

this permit;

B) Have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under

the conditions of this permit;

C) Inspect, at reasonable times and using reasonable safety practices, any facilities,

equipment (including monitoring and air pollution control equipment), practices, or

operations regulated or required under this permit; and

D) As authorized by the Missouri Air Conservation Law, Chapter 643, RSMo or the Act,

sample or monitor, at reasonable times, substances or parameters for the purpose of

assuring compliance with the terms of this permit, and all applicable requirements as

outlined in this permit.

III) All progress reports required under an applicable schedule of compliance shall be

submitted semiannually (or more frequently if specified in the applicable requirement).

These progress reports shall contain the following:

A) Dates for achieving the activities, milestones or compliance required in the schedule

of compliance, and dates when these activities, milestones or compliance were

achieved, and

B) An explanation of why any dates in the schedule of compliance were not or will not be

met, and any preventative or corrective measures adopted.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 137

Project No. 2240-0030-014

IV) The permittee shall submit an annual certification that it is in compliance with all of the

federally enforceable terms and conditions contained in this permit, including emissions

limitations, standards, or work practices. These certifications shall be submitted

annually unless the applicable requirement specifies more frequent submission. The

compliance certification shall include the following:

A) The identification of each term or condition of the permit that is the basis of the

certification,

B) The current compliance status, as shown by monitoring data and other information

reasonably available to the installation,

C) Whether compliance was continuous or intermittent,

D) The method(s) used for determining the compliance status of the installation, both

currently and over the reporting period, and

E) Such other facts as the Air Pollution Control Program will require in order to

determine the compliance status of this installation.

Permit Shield

10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)6.

I) Compliance with the conditions of this permit shall be deemed compliance with all

applicable requirements as of the date that this permit is issued, provided that:

A) The applicable requirements are included and specifically identified in this permit; or

B) The permitting authority, in acting on the permit revision or permit application,

determines in writing that other requirements, as specifically identified in the permit,

are not applicable to the installation, and this permit expressly includes that

determination or a concise summary of it.

II) Be aware that there are exceptions to this permit protection. The permit shield does not

affect the following:

A) The provisions of section 303 of the Act or section 643.090, RSMo concerning

emergency orders,

B) Liability for any violation of an applicable requirement which occurred prior to, or

was existing at, the time of permit issuance,

C) The applicable requirements of the acid rain program,

D) The administrator's authority to obtain information, or

E) Any other permit or extra-permit provisions, terms or conditions expressly excluded

from the permit shield provisions.

Emergency Provisions

10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)7.

I) An emergency or upset as defined in 10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)7. shall constitute an

affirmative defense to an enforcement action brought for noncompliance with

technology-based emissions limitations. To establish an emergency- or upset-based

defense, you must demonstrate, through properly signed, contemporaneous operating

logs or other relevant evidence, the following:

A) That an emergency or upset occurred and that you can identify the source of the

emergency or upset,

B) That the installation was being operated properly,

C) That you took all reasonable steps to minimize emissions that exceeded technologybased emissions limitations or requirements in this permit, and
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 138

Project No. 2240-0030-014

D) That you submitted notice of the emergency to the Air Pollution Control Program

within two (2) working days of the time when emission limitations were exceeded due

to the emergency. This notice must contain a description of the emergency, any

steps taken to mitigate emissions, and any corrective actions taken.

II) Be aware that an emergency or upset shall not include noncompliance caused by

improperly designed equipment, lack of preventative maintenance, careless or improper

operation, or operator error.

Operational Flexibility

10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)8.

An installation that has been issued a Part 70 operating permit is not required to apply for

or obtain a permit revision in order to make any of the changes to the permitted installation

described below if the changes are not Title I modifications, the changes do not cause

emissions to exceed emissions allowable under the permit, and the changes do not result in

the emission of any air contaminant not previously emitted. The permittee shall notify the

Air Pollution Control Program and the Administrator at least seven (7) days in advance of

these changes, except as allowed for emergency or upset conditions. Emissions allowable

under the permit means a federally enforceable permit term or condition determined at

issuance to be required by an applicable requirement that established an emissions limit

(including a work practice standard) or a federally enforceable emissions cap that the

source has assumed to avoid an applicable requirement to which the source would

otherwise be subject.

I) Section 502(b)(10) changes. Changes that, under section 502(b)(10) of the Act,

contravene an express permit term may be made without a permit revision, except for

changes that would violate applicable requirements of the Act or contravene federally

enforceable monitoring (including test methods), record keeping, reporting or compliance

requirements of the permit.

A) Before making a change under this provision, The permittee shall provide advance

written notice to the Air Pollution Control Program and to the Administrator,

describing the changes to be made, the date on which the change will occur, and any

changes in emission and any permit terms and conditions that are affected. The

permittee shall maintain a copy of the notice with the permit, and this agency shall

place a copy with the permit in the public file. Written notice shall be provided to the

administrator and this agency at least seven (7) days before the change is to be made.

If less than seven (7) days notice is provided because of a need to respond more

quickly to these unanticipated conditions, The permittee shall provide notice to the

administrator and the permitting authority as soon as possible after learning of the

need to make the change.

B) The permit shield shall not apply to these changes.

Off-Permit Changes

10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)9.

I) Except as noted below, The permittee may make any change in its permitted operations,

activities or emissions that is not addressed in, constrained by or prohibited by this

permit without obtaining a permit revision. Insignificant activities listed in the

application, but not otherwise addressed in or prohibited by this permit, shall not be

considered to be constrained by this permit for purposes of the off-permit provisions of
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 139

Project No. 2240-0030-014

this section. Off-permit changes shall be subject to the following requirements and

restrictions:

A) The change must meet all applicable requirements of the Act and may not violate any

existing permit term or condition; The permittee may not change a permitted

installation without a permit revision, if this change is subject to any requirements

under Title IV of the Act or is a Title I modification;

B) The permittee must provide written notice of the change to the permitting authority

and to the administrator no later than the next annual emissions report. This notice

shall not be required for changes that are insignificant activities under paragraph

(6)(B)3. of this rule. This written notice shall describe each change, including the

date, any change in emissions, pollutants emitted and any applicable requirement

that would apply as a result of the change.

C) The permittee shall keep a record describing all changes made at the installation that

result in emissions of a regulated air pollutant subject to an applicable requirement

and the emissions resulting from these changes; and

D) The permit shield shall not apply to these changes.

Responsible Official

10 CSR 10-6.020(2)(R)12.

The application utilized in the preparation of this was signed by Robert L. Camereer, Plant

Manager. Lafarge Corporation has provided the MDNR with the appropriate supporting

documentation in a letter dated May 16, 2000 designating Mr. Ronald A. Thorson, Plant

Manager, to act as the “responsible official” in all matters pertaining to Lafarge Corporation

- Sugar Creek Plant. If this person terminates employment, or is reassigned different duties

such that a different person becomes the responsible person to represent and bind the

installation in environmental permitting affairs, the owner or operator of this air

contaminant source shall notify the Director of the Air Pollution Control Program of the

change. Said notification shall be in writing and shall be submitted within 30 days of the

change. The notification shall include the name and title of the new person assigned by the

source owner or operator to represent and bind the installation in environmental permitting

affairs. All representations, agreement to terms and conditions and covenants made by the

former responsible person that were used in the establishment of limiting permit conditions

on this permit will continue to be binding on the installation until such time that a revision

to this permit is obtained that would change said representations, agreements and

covenants.

Statement of Basis

10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(E)1.C.

This permit is accompanied by a statement setting forth the legal and factual basis for the

draft permit conditions (including references to applicable statutory or regulatory

provisions). This Statement of Basis, while referenced by the permit, is not an actual part

of the permit.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 140

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Attachment A

Fugitive Emission Observations

Visible Emissions Abnormal Emissions

Date Time Beyond Boundary

No Yes Cause Corrective Action Initial
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 141

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Attachment B

Opacity Emission Observations

Visible Emissions Abnormal Emissions

Date Time Emission

Source Normal Less

Than

Greater

Than Cause Corrective Action

Signature
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant SB - 1

Project No. 2240-0030-014

STATEMENT OF BASIS

Permit Reference Documents

These documents were relied upon in the preparation of the operating permit. Because they

are not incorporated by reference, they are not an official part of the operating permit.

1) Part 70 Operating Permit Application, received March 17, 1997; revised April 9, 1997;

2) 1998 Emissions Inventory Questionnaire, received April 1, 1999; and

3) U.S. EPA document AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors; Volume I,

Stationary Point and Area Sources, Fifth Edition

Applicable Requirements Included in the Operating Permit but Not in the Application

In the operating permit application, the installation indicated they were not subject to the

following regulation(s). However, in the review of the application, the agency has

determined that the installation is subject to the following regulation(s) for the reasons

stated.

10 CSR 10-6.180, Measurement of Emissions of Air Contaminants,

This rule has been included in the operating permit in order to provide citing for the

allowance of requests for emissions data results. On past forms issued by the Air

Pollution Control Program, including the application for this permit, it was

automatically marked as an administrative rule not required to be listed as an

applicable requirement. It is no longer judged to be solely administrative and is,

therefore, included in the operating permit.

10 CSR 10-6.260, Restriction of Emission of Sulfur Compounds

This rule had not been created at the time of application; however, it has been

determined to be applicable to the installation and, therefore, has been included in

the operating permit.

Other Air Regulations Determined Not to Apply to the Operating Permit

The Air Pollution Control Program (APCP) has determined the following requirements to not

be applicable to this installation at this time for the reasons stated.

10 CSR 10-2.060, Restriction of Emissions of Visible Air Contaminants

This rule was rescinded from the Missouri Air Rules and Regulations as of November

30, 1999, but is still in the State Implementation Plan (SIP). This regulation has

been replaced by 10 CSR 10-6.220, Restriction of Emissions of Visible Air

Contaminants. With the installation demonstrating compliance with 10 CSR 10-

6.220, they will also be demonstrating compliance with this rule. Therefore, this rule

was not cited in the applicable requirement section of the operating permit.

10 CSR 10-6.240, Asbestos Abatement Projects – Registration, Notification and Performance

Requirements.

This rule has not been included in the operating permit because the rule was struck

down in the Cole County Circuit court.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant SB - 2

Project No. 2240-0030-014

10 CSR 10-2.160 Restriction of Emissions of Sulfur Compounds

Sources

10 CSR 10-2.200 Restriction of Emissions of Sulfur Compounds From Indirect Heating

Sources. 

These rules have been rescinded from the SIP, and therefore have not been included

in the operating permit. The sulfur regulations are covered under state regulation 10

CSR 10-6.260.

10 CSR 10-2.030, Restriction of Emission Particulate Matter From Industrial Processes

In the operating permit application, the installation indicated that the grinding,

crushing, and classifying operations (EU0010 through EU0070) at their rock quarry

were subject to this regulation. According to 10 CSR 10-2.030(3)(D)1. this rule does

not apply to the grinding, crushing and classifying operations at a rock quarry,

therefore this rule is not included as an applicable requirement for EU0010 through

EU0070.

10 CSR 10-2.040, Maximum Allowable Emission of Particulate Matter From Fuel Burning

Equipment Used for Indirect Heating

The installation has reported two (2) 1.33 MMBTU/hr natural gas steam boilers and

several natural gas fired space heaters < 10 MMBTU/hr subject to this rule.

However, the APCP would not consider these sources to be capable of exceeding the

emission limitation (0.40 pounds of particulate matter per million BTU's of heat

input) of this rule.

Construction Permit Revisions

The following revisions were made to construction permits for this installation:

1) Construction Permit Number: 0891-005

This construction permit was superceded by Construction Permit Number: 0891-005A.

Therefore, the requirements for this construction permit were not included in the

operating permit.

2) Construction Permit Number 0897-019

This construction permit is for a new Portland cement manufacturing plant and an

aggregate operation at Sugar Creek. At the time of this review the equipment that was

authorized to be constructed has not been fully constructed nor operational, therefore,

the requirements for this construction permit were not included in the operating permit.

NSPS Applicability

10 CSR 10-6.070, New Source Performance Regulations

40 CFR Part 60, Subpart F, Standards of Performance for Portland Cement Plants

This standard is applicable to the following affected facilities in portland cement

plants that commences construction or modification after August 17, 1971: Kiln,

clinker cooler, raw mill system, finish mill system, raw mill dryer, raw material

storage, clinker storage, finished product storage, conveyor transfer points, bagging

and bulk loading and unloading systems.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant SB - 3

Project No. 2240-0030-014

According to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL, §63.1356 an exemption from new source

performance standards is given. Any affected source subject to the provisions of 40

CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL, is exempted from any otherwise applicable new source

performance standard contained in 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart F, except for:

• Kilns and in-line kiln/raw mills, as applicable under 40 CFR 60.60(b), located at

areas sources are subject to PM and opacity limits and associated reporting and

record keeping, under 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart F.

• Greenfield raw material dryers, as applicable under 40 CFR 60.60(b) located at

area sources are subject to opacity limits and associated reporting and record

keeping under 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart F.

Since the installation is a major source according to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL,

the installation is exempted from the new source performance standard contained in

40 CFR Part 60, Subpart F.

10 CSR 10-6.070, New Source Performance Regulations

40 CFR Part 60, Subpart O, Standards of Performance for Sewage Treatment Plants

This standard is applicable to the following affected facilities that commence

construction or modification after June 11, 1973: each incinerator that combusts

wastes containing more than 10 percent sewage sludge (dry basis) produced by

municipal sewage treatment plants, or each incinerator that charges more than 1000

kg (2205 lb) per day municipal sewage sludge (dry basis)

Lafarge operates 6,000 gallon per day sewage treatment plant (EP-0) at the Sugar

Creek Plant. The plant operates 24 hours per day, 365 days per year. The sewage

treatment plant was installed prior to 1973 and does not operate an incinerator to

combust wastes. At the time of installation, NSPS was not applicable to these types

of units. Therefore emissions from this source is not regulated by federal

requirements. Similarly, emissions from this source are not regulated by state

requirements.

10 CSR 10-6.070, New Source Performance Regulations

40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Y, Standards of Performance for Coal Preparation Plants

The coal unloading, conveying and crushing operations at this installation are not

subject to the New Source Performance Standards Subpart Y. This subpart applies

to coal preparation plants which were constructed at various times after October 24,

1974. The coal unloading, conveying and crushing equipment at this installation

were constructed prior to October 24, 1974, so are not subject to this subpart.

10 CSR 10-6.070, New Source Performance Regulations

40 CFR Part 60, Subpart OOO, Standards of Performance for Nonmetallic Mineral Processing

Plants

This standard is applicable to the following affected facilities in fixed or portable

notmetallic mineral processing plants that commences construction or modification

after August 31, 1983: each crusher, grinding mill, screening operation, bucket

elevator, belt conveyor, bagging operation, storage bin, enclosed truck or railcar

loading station.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant SB - 4

Project No. 2240-0030-014

According to §60.670(b), “An affected facility that is subject to the provisions of

subpart F or I or that follows in the plant process any facility subject to the

provisions of subparts F or I of this part is not subject to the provisions of this

subpart.”

The quarry operations at Lafarge Corporation – Sugar Creek Plant are prior to any

facility processes that are subject to the provisions of subparts F. However, the

quarry operations were installed prior to August 31, 1983 and are not subject to this

standard. Since the rest of installation is either subject to the provisions of subpart

F or follows in the plant process a facility subject to the provision of subpart F, this

requirement was not included in the operating permit.

MACT Applicability

10 CSR 10-6.075, Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart T, National Emission Standards for Halogenated Solvent Cleaning

The provisions of this subpart apply to each individual batch vapor, in-line vapor, inline cold, and batch cold solvent cleaning machine that uses any solvent containing

methylene chloride, perchloroethylene, trichloroethylene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane,

carbon tetrachloride or chloroform, or any combination of these halogenated HAP

solvents, in a total concentration greater than 5 percent by weight, as a cleaning

and/or drying agent. Wipe cleaning activities, such as using a rag containing

halogenated solvent are not covered under the provisions of this subpart.

Lafarge Corporation has 3 solvent degreasers that use 100% hydrotreated light

petroleum distillates (CAS No. 64742-47-8), therefore the installation is not subject to

this standard.

10 CSR 10-6.075, Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart DD, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants

from Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations

The provisions of this subpart do not apply to Lafarge Corporation – Sugar Creek

Plant. The Sugar Creek Plant is not operated as a waste management operation that

receives off-site material, regulated as a hazardous waste treatment, storage and

disposal facility (TSDF) under 40 CFR Part 264. The installation does not utilizes

hazardous waste fuels. Therefore, Lafarge Corporation is not subject to the

requirements of 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart DD.

10 CSR 10-6.075, Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants

from Hazardous Waste Combustors

The provisions of this subpart apply to all hazardous waste combustors: hazardous

waste incinerators, hazardous waste burning cement kilns and hazardous waste

burning lightweight kilns, except as provided in the subpart:

The installation does not utilize hazardous waste fuel: Therefore, Lafarge Corporation

is not subject to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant SB - 5

Project No. 2240-0030-014

10 CSR 10-6.075, Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants

From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry

The provisions of this subpart apply to each new and existing portland cement plant

that is a major or an area source. The affected sources subject to this regulation are:

• Each kiln and each in-line kiln/raw mill at any major or area source, including

alkali bypasses, except for kilns and in-line kiln/raw mills that burn hazardous

waste and are subject to and regulated under subpart EEE of this part;

• Each clinker cooler at any portland cement plant that is a major source;

• Each raw mill at any portland cement plant that is a major source;

• Each finish mill at any portland cement plant that is a major source;

• Each raw material dryer at any portland cement plant that is a major source and

each greenfield raw material dryer at any portland cement plant that is a major or

area source;

• Each conveying system transfer point at any portland cement plant that is a major

source;

• Each bagging system at any portland cement plant that is a major source; and

• Each bulk loading or unloading system at any portland cement plant that is a

major source;

The installation is a major source of HAPs, and therefore the kiln, clinker cooler, raw

mill, finish mill, raw material dryer, conveying system transfer points, bagging system

and bulk loading /unloading systems are covered by the MACT. The two rotary kilns

do not contain an in-line raw mill or an alkali bypass.

NESHAP Applicability

10 CSR 10-6.080, Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants

40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M, National Emission Standard for Asbestos

The installation is subject to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M. The

requirements of this rule have been summarized and listed in the operating permit.

Other Regulatory Determinations

(1) 10 CSR 10-2.030, Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter From Industrial

Processes,

EU0080 – Rock/Clay Silo (#3 belt unloading to silo)

The particulate matter emission limit is 63.0 lbs/hr. This process is enclosed. The

uncontrolled emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (300 Tons/Hr) and

the AP-42 emission factor is as follows:

SCC

PM-Uncontrolled Emission

Factor (lb/ton)

PM-Uncontrolled Emission Rate

(lb/hr)

3-05-006-07 0.00085 0.26

The uncontrolled emission rate is approximately two hundred forty (240) times less

than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant SB - 6

Project No. 2240-0030-014

rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring

requirements.

EU0090 – Alternate Raw Material Silos (Transfer Points)

The particulate matter emission limit is 30.51 lbs/hr. This process is equipped with

a fabric filter. The emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (20 Tons/Hr) is

as follows:

SCC

PM-Controlled Emission Factor

(lb/ton)

PM-Controlled Emission Rate

(lb/hr)

3-05-006-12 0.000029 0.001

The control efficiency of the fabric filter is 99.35%, according to the installation.

Based on a control efficiency of 99.35%, the uncontrolled emission rate is 0.001

lbs/hr. The uncontrolled emission rate is much lower than the allowable emission

rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore

there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0100 – Mill Scale & Gypsum Unloading Station

Iron mill scale and gypsum are unloaded t a hopper before being processed to their

storage silos. Fugitive PM emissions result from unloading the materials to the

hopper. Therefore EU0100 is not subject to 10 CSR 10-2.030.

EU0110 – Mill Scale Silo (conveyor transfer point)

The particulate matter emission limit is 30.51 lbs/hr. This process is enclosed. The

uncontrolled emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (20 Tons/Hr) and the

AP-42 emission factor is as follows:

SCC

PM-Uncontrolled Emission

Factor (lb/ton)

PM-Uncontrolled Emission Rate

(lb/hr)

3-05-006-07 0.00085 0.017

The uncontrolled emission rate is much lower than the allowable emission rate. It is

highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are

no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0120 – Alternate Raw Materuial Transfer Station

The particulate matter emission limit for catalyst transfer is 1.25 lbs/hr and nonhazardous waste is 12.63. This process is equipped with fabric filter. The controlled

emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (0.17 Tons/Hr for catalyst and

5.38 Tons/Hr for non-hazardous waste) and the FIRE emission factor is as follows:

SCC

PM-Controlled Emission Factor

(lb/ton)

PM-Controlled Emission Rate

(lb/hr)

3-05-006-07 2.900E-5 4.930E-6 (Catalyst)

1.554E-4 (Non-Hazardous Waste)
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant SB - 7

Project No. 2240-0030-014

The uncontrolled emission rates (4.96E-6 & 1.56E-4) are much lower than the

allowable emission rates. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rates will

be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0130 – Mill Feed Silo Building

The particulate matter emission limit is 54.72 lbs/hr. This process is enclosed. The

uncontrolled emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (140 Tons/Hr) and

the AP-42 emission factor is as follows:

SCC

PM-Uncontrolled Emission

Factor (lb/ton)

PM-Uncontrolled Emission Rate

(lb/hr)

3-05-006-07 0.00085 0.012

The uncontrolled emission rate is much lower than the allowable emission rate. It is

highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are

no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0140 - Raw Mill #1 Conveyor (to feed belt)

EU0150 - Raw Mill #1 Feed Belt

EU0160 – Raw Mill #1 Weigh Hopper

EU0170 – Raw Mill #1 Grinder

EU0180 – Raw Mill #1 Air Separator

EU0190 – Raw Mill #1 - Unloading (airslide to raw mix pumps)

EU0200 – Raw Mill #1 Dryer

The particulate matter emission limit is 47.77 lbs/hr. This process is equipped with

fabric filter. The emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (70 Tons/Hr) and

the AP-42/FIRE emission factor is as follows:

Emission PM-Emission Rate (lb/hr)

Unit SCC

PM-Controlled Emission

Factor (lb/ton) Controlled Uncontrolled

EU0140 3-05-006-07 8.50E-4 4.0E-4 0.08

EU0150 3-05-006-24 3.01E-3 0.22 33.38

EU0160 3-05-006-25 1.9E-2 1.33 204.62

EU0170 3-05-006-13 1.2E-2 0.84 129.23

EU0180 3-05-006-26 3.2E-2 2.24 344.62

EU0190 3-05-006-07 0.21 (Uncontrolled) 0.96 14.7

EU0200 3-05-006-13 1.2E-2 0.84 129.23

At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rate from EU0180

which is the highest is approximately seven (7) times greater than the allowable

emission rate. The controlled emission rate is approximately twenty-one (21) times

less than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable

emission rate will be exceeded with the control device operating. Control device

#CD12 is used to control emissions from EU0140 through EU0200. Monitoring and

record keeping will be required to ensure that the control device is operating properly.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant SB - 8

Project No. 2240-0030-014

The uncontrolled emission rate is much lower than the allowable emission rate. It is

highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are

no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0210 - Raw Mill #2 Conveyor (to feed belt)

EU0220 - Raw Mill #2 Feed Belt

EU0230 – Raw Mill #2 Weigh Hopper

EU0240 – Raw Mill #2 Grinder

EU0250 – Raw Mill #2 Air Separator

EU0260 – Raw Mill #2 – Unloading (airslide to raw mix pumps)

EU0270 – Raw Mill #2 Dryer

The particulate matter emission limit is 47.77 lbs/hr. This process is equipped with

fabric filter. The emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (70 Tons/Hr) and

the AP-42/FIRE emission factor is as follows:

Emission PM-Emission Rate (lb/hr)

Unit SCC

PM-Controlled Emission

Factor (lb/ton) Controlled Uncontrolled

EU0210 3-05-006-07 8.50E-4 4.0E-4 0.08

EU0220 3-05-006-24 3.01E-3 0.22 33.38

EU0230 3-05-006-25 1.9E-2 1.33 204.62

EU0240 3-05-006-13 1.2E-2 0.84 129.23

EU0250 3-05-006-26 3.2E-2 2.24 344.62

EU0260 3-05-006-07 0.21 (Uncontrolled) 0.96 14.7

EU0270 3-05-006-13 1.2E-2 0.84 129.23

At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rate from EU0250

which is the highest is approximately seven (7) times greater than the allowable

emission rate. The controlled emission rate is approximately twenty-one (21) times

less than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable

emission rate will be exceeded with the control device operating. Control device

#CD13 is used to control emissions from EU0210 through EU0270. Monitoring and

record keeping will be required to ensure that the control device is operating properly.

EU0280 – Blend Silos (Raw Mix Unloading to Blend Silos)

The particulate matter emission limit is 54.725 lbs/hr. This process is equipped with

fabric filter. The emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (140 Tons/Hr)

and the FIRE emission factor is as follows:

PM-Emission Rate (lb/hr)

SCC

PM-Controlled Emission

Factor (lb/ton) Controlled Uncontrolled

3-05-006-12 2.90E-5 0.004 0.62

The uncontrolled emission rate is much lower than the allowable emission rate. It is

highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are

no record keeping or monitoring requirements.
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant SB - 9

Project No. 2240-0030-014

EU0290 – Blend Conveyor (Raw Mix Transfer to Kiln Feed Leveling Box)

The particulate matter emission limit is 52.84 lbs/hr. This process is equipped with

fabric filter. The emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (116.67 Tons/Hr)

and the FIRE emission factor is as follows:

PM-Emission Rate (lb/hr)

SCC

PM-Controlled Emission

Factor (lb/ton) Controlled Uncontrolled

3-05-006-12 2.90E-5 0.003 0.52

The uncontrolled emission rate is much lower than the allowable emission rate. It is

highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are

no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0300 – Blend Conveyor (Raw Mix Unloading to Kiln Feed Leveling Box)

The particulate matter emission limit is 52.84 lbs/hr. This process is equipped with

fabric filter. The emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (116.67 Tons/Hr)

and the FIRE emission factor is as follows:

PM-Emission Rate (lb/hr)

SCC

PM-Controlled Emission

Factor (lb/ton) Controlled Uncontrolled

3-05-006-12 2.90E-5 0.003 0.52

The uncontrolled emission rate is much lower than the allowable emission rate. It is

highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are

no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0350 – Coal Silos (Coal Unloading from Conveyor to Silos)

EU0360 – Coke/NH Waster Fuel Substitute Silos (Unloading from Conveyor to Silos)

The particulate matter emission limit is 42.53 lbs/hr. This process is enclosed. The

uncontrolled emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (40 Tons/Hr) and the

FIRE emission factor is as follows:

SCC

PM-Uncontrolled Emission

Factor (lb/ton)

PM-Uncontrolled Emission Rate

(lb/hr)

3-05-006-07 0.21 8.4

The uncontrolled emission rate is much lower than the allowable emission rate. It is

highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are

no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0370 – Rotary Kiln #1

EU0380 – Rotary Kiln #2

The particulate matter emission limit is 42.03 lbs/hr. This process is enclosed. The

uncontrolled emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (37.88 Tons/Hr) and

the Test emission factor is as follows:
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant SB - 10

Project No. 2240-0030-014

PM-Emission Rate (lb/hr)

SCC

PM-Controlled Emission

Factor (lb/ton) Controlled Uncontrolled

3-05-006-06 108.01 28.51 4090.70

At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rate is approximately

ninety-seven (97) times greater than the allowable emission rate. The controlled

emission rate is approximately one and one half (11⁄2) times less than the allowable

emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded

with the control device operating. Monitoring and record keeping will be required to

ensure that the control device is operating properly.

EU0390 – Clinker Cooler #1

EU0400 – Clinker Cooler #2

The particulate matter emission limit is 42.38 lbs/hr. This process is enclosed. The

uncontrolled emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (39.375 Tons/Hr)

and the FIRE emission factor is as follows:

PM-Emission Rate (lb/hr)

SCC

PM-Controlled Emission

Factor (lb/ton) Controlled Uncontrolled

3-05-006-14 9.20 3.12 362.25

At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rate is approximately

eight (8) times greater than the allowable emission rate. The controlled emission rate

is approximately fourteen (14) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is

highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded with the control

device operating. Monitoring and record keeping will be required to ensure that the

control device is operating properly.

EU0410 – Clinker Roll Crusher

The particulate matter emission limit is 48.43 lbs/hr. This process is equipped with

fabric filter. The emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (75 Tons/Hr) and

the FIRE emission factor is as follows:

SCC

PM-Uncontrolled Emission

Factor (lb/ton)

PM-Uncontrolled Emission Rate

(lb/hr)

3-05-006-11 0.17 12.60

The uncontrolled emission rate is much lower than the allowable emission rate. It is

highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are

no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0420 – Clinker Reclaim & Transfer Station (Unloading mine or purchase clinker

to silos)

The particulate matter emission limit is 42.97 lbs/hr. This process is equipped with

fabric filter. The emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (42 Tons/Hr) and

the AP-42 emission factor is as follows:
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant SB - 11

Project No. 2240-0030-014

SCC

PM-Uncontrolled Emission

Factor (lb/ton)

PM-Uncontrolled Emission Rate

(lb/hr)

3-05-006-16 0.16 6.79

The uncontrolled emission rate is much lower than the allowable emission rate. It is

highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are

no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0430 – Clinker Transfer from Roll Crusher to Silos (#7 Belt)

The particulate matter emission limit is 48.43 lbs/hr. This process is equipped with

fabric filter. The emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (75 Tons/Hr) and

the AP-42 emission factor is as follows:

SCC

PM-Uncontrolled Emission

Factor (lb/ton)

PM-Uncontrolled Emission Rate

(lb/hr)

3-05-006-16 0.16 12.13

The uncontrolled emission rate is much lower than the allowable emission rate. It is

highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are

no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0440 – Clinker Silos – Unloading to Silos

The particulate matter emission limit is 48.43 lbs/hr. This process is equipped with

fabric filter. The emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (75 Tons/Hr) and

the AP-42 emission factor is as follows:

SCC

PM-Uncontrolled Emission

Factor (lb/ton)

PM-Uncontrolled Emission Rate

(lb/hr)

3-05-006-16 0.16 12.13

The uncontrolled emission rate is much lower than the allowable emission rate. It is

highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are

no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0450 – Clinker Loadout Station #1 (Clinker Unloading from Silos to Truck)

EU0460 – Clinker Loadout Station #2 (Clinker Unloading from Silos to Truck)

The particulate matter emission limit is 42.97 lbs/hr. This process is equipped with

fabric filter. The emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (42 Tons/Hr) and

the AP-42 emission factor is as follows:

SCC

PM-Uncontrolled Emission

Factor (lb/ton)

PM-Uncontrolled Emission Rate

(lb/hr)

3-05-006-16 0.16 6.79
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant SB - 12

Project No. 2240-0030-014

The uncontrolled emission rate is much lower than the allowable emission rate. It is

highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are

no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0470 – Gypsum Silos (Transfer Conveyor Unloading to Gypsum Silos)

The particulate matter emission limit is 30.51 lbs/hr. This process is enclosed. The

uncontrolled emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (20 Tons/Hr) and the

AP-42 emission factor is as follows:

SCC

PM-Uncontrolled Emission

Factor (lb/ton)

PM-Uncontrolled Emission Rate

(lb/hr)

3-05-006-07 0.01 0.12

The uncontrolled emission rate is much lower than the allowable emission rate. It is

highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are

no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0480 – Finish Mill #1 Feed Belt

EU0490 – Finish Mill #1 Weigh Hopper

EU0500 – Finish Mill #1 Grinder

EU0510 – Finish Mill #1 Air Separator

The particulate matter emission limit is 40.52 lbs/hr. This process is equipped with

fabric filter. The emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (32 Tons/Hr) and

the FIRE emission factor is as follows:

Emission PM-Emission Rate (lb/hr)

Unit SCC

PM-Controlled Emission

Factor (lb/ton) Controlled Uncontrolled

EU0480 3-05-006-27 2.4E-3 0.077 11.82

EU0490 3-05-006-28 9.4E-3 0.301 46.28

EU0500 3-05-006-17 96 (Uncontrolled) 19.97 3072

EU0510 3-05-006-29 0.028 0.90 137.85

At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rates from EU0500

through EU0520 are greater than the allowable emission rate. The controlled

emission rate of EU0510 which is the highest is approximately two (2) times less than

the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will

be exceeded with the control device operating. Control device #CD34 is used to

control emissions from EU0490 through EU0520. Monitoring and record keeping will

be required to ensure that the control device is operating properly.

EU0520 – Finish Mill #2 Feed Belt

EU0530 – Finish Mill #2 Weigh Hopper

EU0550 – Finish Mill #2 Grinder

EU0560 – Finish Mill #2 Air Separator

The particulate matter emission limit is 41.57 lbs/hr. This process is equipped with

fabric filter. The emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (36 Tons/Hr) and

the FIRE emission factor is as follows:
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant SB - 13

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Emission PM-Emission Rate (lb/hr)

Unit SCC

PM-Controlled Emission

Factor (lb/ton) Controlled Uncontrolled

EU0520 3-05-006-27 2.4E-3 0.086 13.29

EU0530 3-05-006-28 9.4E-3 0.338 52.06

EU0550 3-05-006-17 96 (Uncontrolled) 22.46 3456

EU0560 3-05-006-29 0.028 1.008 155.08

At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rates from EU0550

through EU0560 are greater than the allowable emission rate. The controlled

emission rate of EU0550 which is the highest is approximately two (2) times less than

the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will

be exceeded with the control device operating. Control device #CD35 is used to

control emissions from EU0530 through EU0560. Monitoring and record keeping will

be required to ensure that the control device is operating properly.

EU0540 – Finish Mill Fringe Tank

The particulate matter emission limit is 51.07 lbs/hr. This process is equipped with

fabric filter. The emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (98 Tons/Hr) and

the FIRE emission factor is as follows:

SCC

PM-Uncontrolled Emission

Factor (lb/ton)

PM-Uncontrolled Emission Rate

(lb/hr)

3-05-011-07 0.24 23.52

The uncontrolled emission rate is approximately two (2) times less than the allowable

emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded,

therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0570 – Finish Mill #3 Feed Belt (Belt 12A)

EU0580 – Finish Mill #3 Weigh Hopper

EU0590 – Finish Mill #3 Grinder

EU0600 – Finish Mill #3 Air Separator

The particulate matter emission limit is 40.04 lbs/hr. This process is equipped with

fabric filter. The emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (30 Tons/Hr) and

the FIRE emission factor is as follows:

Emission PM-Emission Rate (lb/hr)

Unit SCC

PM-Controlled Emission

Factor (lb/ton) Controlled Uncontrolled

EU0570 3-05-006-27 2.4E-3 0.072 11.08

EU0580 3-05-006-28 9.4E-3 0.282 43.38

EU0590 3-05-006-17 96 (Uncontrolled) 18.72 2880

EU0600 3-05-006-29 0.028 0.84 129.23

At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rates from EU0580

through EU0600 are greater than the allowable emission rate. The controlled

emission rate of EU0590 which is the highest is approximately two (2) times less than
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant SB - 14

Project No. 2240-0030-014

the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will

be exceeded with the control device operating. Control device #CD36 is used to

control emissions from EU0570 through EU0600. Monitoring and record keeping will

be required to ensure that the control device is operating properly.

EU00610 – Cement Storage Silos (Cement Transfer to Storage Silos)

The particulate matter emission limit is 51.07 lbs/hr. This process is equipped with

fabric filter. The emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (98 Tons/Hr) and

the FIRE emission factor is as follows:

SCC

PM-Uncontrolled Emission

Factor (lb/ton)

PM-Uncontrolled Emission Rate

(lb/hr)

3-05-011-07 0.24 23.52

The uncontrolled emission rate is approximately two (2) times less than the allowable

emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded,

therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0620 – Pneumatic Cement Conveyor #1

EU0630 - Pneumatic Cement Conveyor #2

The particulate matter emission limit is 44.39 lbs/hr. This process is equipped with

fabric filter. The emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (49 Tons/Hr) and

the FIRE emission factor is as follows:

PM-Emission Rate (lb/hr)

SCC

PM-Controlled Emission

Factor (lb/ton) Controlled Uncontrolled

3-05-006-12 2.90E-5 0.001 0.22

The uncontrolled emission rate is much lower than the allowable emission rate. It is

highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are

no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0640 – Cement Unloading Silos-Truck #1

EU0650 – Cement Unloading Silos-Truck #2

EU0660 – Barge Loadout Station

EU0670 – Railcar Loadout Station

EU0680 – Truck Loadout Station #1

EU0690 – Truck Loadout Station #2

The particulate matter emission limit is 44.39 lbs/hr. This process is equipped with

fabric filter. The emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (49 Tons/Hr) and

the FIRE emission factor is as follows:

Emission Unit SCC

PM-Uncontrolled

Emission Factor

(lb/ton)

PM-Uncontrolled

Emission Rate

(lb/hr)

EU0640 3-05-011-07 0.24 11.76

EU0650 3-05-011-07 0.24 11.76
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant SB - 15

Project No. 2240-0030-014

EU0660 3-05-006-19 0.42 20.58

EU0670 3-05-006-19 0.42 20.58

EU0680 3-05-006-19 0.42 20.58

EU0690 3-05-006-19 0.42 20.58

The uncontrolled emission rate is at least two (2) much less than the allowable

emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded,

therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

(2) 10 CSR 10-6.260, Restriction of Emission of Sulfur Compounds

EU0370 – Rotary Kiln #1 and EU0380 – Rotary Kiln #2

The installation has conducted emission monitoring on the ESP outlet of Kiln #2 from

September 12 through September 27, 1995. The purpose of the testing was to

determine the degree of variance in emission rates of NOx, SOx, CO, THC, CO2, and

O2 over an extended period of time. The kiln was operational for all days except on

September 22 through 26 when an expected delay in kiln operation occurred.

Monitoring results show that SOx average emissions were 209.11 lbs/hr and average

concentration of 296.58 ppm.

During the permit review ambient air quality modeling using Screen 3 model was

conducted to determine the ambient air impacts of SOX. The modeling (summarized

below) predicted that the units would remain in compliance with the SOX emission

standards.

Averaging Time Total Ambient Impact NAAQS Standard

Annual 8.38 μg/m3 80 μg/m3

24-Hour 44.86 μg/m3 365 μg/m3

3-Hour 94.23 μg/m3 1300 μg/m3

Therefore no monitoring or record keeping is required as the test and modelling

results show that the SOx concentration and ambient impact are well below the

standards and the units will always be in compliance

(3) Emission Units Without Limitation

The sources listed as units without limitation are fugitive sources which do not emit

regulated pollutants from a discrete stack or vent. These sources emit particulate

matter and volatile organic compounds directly into the ambient air. These sources

do not have any type of capture/control devices and are not covered or required to

control their emissions based on any past or current regulations. These sources are

not subject to any specific rule except the installation wide requirement of 10 CSR

10-6.170 and must comply with this requirement.

(4) The following is the list of equipment which are identified as insignificant activities at

the time of permit issuance.

(5)

Description of Activity Activity Ref. #

1.33 MMBtu/hr each Natural Gas Fired Boiler EP-54

1.33 MMBtu/hr each Natural Gas Fired Boiler EP-55

Laboratory Fume Hoods and Vents EP-56

Twenty (20) 0.5 MMBtu/hr each Natural Gas Fired Space Heaters Plant
Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant SB - 16

Project No. 2240-0030-014

Other Regulations Not Cited in the Operating Permit or the Above Statement of Basis

Any regulation which is not specifically listed in either the Operating Permit or in the above

Statement of Basis does not appear, based on this review, to be an applicable requirement

for this installation for one (1) or more of the following reasons:

1. The specific pollutant regulated by that rule is not emitted by the installation;

2. The installation is not in the source category regulated by that rule;

3. The installation is not in the county or specific area that is regulated under the

authority of that rule;

4. The installation does not contain the type of emission unit which is regulated by that

rule;

5. The rule is only for administrative purposes.

Should a later determination conclude that the installation is subject to one (1) or more of

the regulations cited in this Statement of Basis or other regulations which were not cited,

the installation shall determine and demonstrate, to the APCP's satisfaction, the

installation's compliance with that regulation(s). If the installation is not in compliance

with a regulation which was not previously cited, the installation shall submit to the APCP

a schedule for achieving compliance for that regulation(s).

Prepared by:

Berhanu A. Getahun

Environmental Engineer
September 13, 2000

Lafarge Corporation

4000 Town Center, Suite 2000

Southfield, MI 48075

Re: Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant

Sugar Creek, MO 64050, Jackson County

Permit Number:

Dear Sir/Madam:

Enclosed with this letter is your operating permit. Please review this document carefully.

Operation of your installation in accordance with the rules and regulations cited in this document

is necessary for continued compliance.

If you have any questions or need additional information regarding this permit, please contact the

Air Pollution Control Program (APCP) at (573) 751-4817, or you may write to the Department

of Natural Resources, Air Pollution Control Program, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102.

Sincerely,

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAM

Randy Raymond

Permit Section Chief

RR:bgb

Enclosures

c: US EPA Region VII

Kansas City Regional Office

PATs File: 2240-0030-014
Steven J. Kidwell CERTIFIED MAIL: Z 321 860 047

Lafarge Corporation RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED

4201 North River Boulevard

Sugar Creek, MO 64050

Re: Draft Title V Operating Permit – Project No.: 2240-0030-014

Dear Kidwell:

The Air Pollution Control Program (APCP) has completed the preliminary review of your Title

V permit application. A public notice will be placed in the Kansas City Star on April 16, 2000.

The conditions and monitoring requirements of the draft permit are open for comment by the

public and you until May 16, 2000. Standard permit wording (i.e. General Requirements) is not

open for comment, since these provisions are required by law and regulation.

The APCP will accept comments regarding the conditions and monitoring regulations that are

postmarked on or before the closing date. Please address comments or recommendations for

changes to my attention at:

Operating Permits Unit

Air Pollution Control Program

P.O. Box 176

Jefferson City, MO 65102

A copy of this draft has also been sent to the U.S. EPA’s Region VII office in Kansas City for

their review. The Region VII office is afforded, by law, oversight authority on any Title V

permit which Missouri (or any of the other states in the region) may propose to issue. A public

hearing may be held if sufficient interest is expressed by the public.

Should you have any questions, or wish clarification on any items in this draft permit, please feel

free to contact me at (573) 751-4817.

Sincerely,

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAM

Berhanu A. Getahun

Environmental Engineer

BAG/blw

Enclosures

c: PATS File
KANSAS

RE: Affected States Review – Notification of Proposed Final Part 70 Operating Permit

Dear Mr. {Director’s Name}:

In accordance with Missouri State Rule 10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(F)1. and the Clean Air Act this

letter is to notify you of public notice of the preliminary draft and request for comments for:

Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant, Sugar Creek, MO 64050

Project Number - 2240-0030-014

Public notice will be published in the newspaper published in, city, on date.

You are invited to submit any relevant information, materials, and views in support of or in

opposition to the draft operating permits in writing by no later than date + 30 to my attention at

Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Air Pollution Control Program, P.O. Box 176,

Jefferson City, MO 65102.

Should you require further information or documentation on this matter, please contact the

Operating Permits Unit at (573) 751-4817. Thank you for your time and attention.

Sincerely,

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAM

Randy Raymond

Permit Section Chief

RDR:BAG ct first initial