alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Dorothy M. DiSanto, Respondent, v Frank J. DiSanto, Appellant.

[816 NYS2d 520]

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Ross, J.), dated December 21, 2004, which denied his motion, inter alia, to hold the plaintiff in contempt for allegedly misrepresenting her assets in her revised net worth statement, and to award him a $158,000 credit against support arrears owed to the plaintiff because of an alleged sale by her of marital property.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order as denied that branch of the defendant’s motion which was to award him a $158,000 credit against support arrears owed to the plaintiff because of an alleged sale by her of marital property is dismissed, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant did not submit clear and convincing evidence to substantiate his claim that the Supreme Court should have adjudged the plaintiff in contempt for misrepresenting her assets in her revised net worth statement *(see Rienzi v Rienzi,*23 AD3d 447, 448-449 [2005]; *Raphael v Raphael,*20 AD3d 463, 463-464 [2005]; *Vujovic v Vujovic,*16 AD3d 490, 491 [2005]).

The defendant’s arguments regarding a prior order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated June 10, 2003, are not properly before this Court, as he did not file a notice of appeal from that order *(see*CPLR 5513 [a]).

The defendant’s arguments regarding one of the Supreme Court’s factual findings at a contempt proceeding held on May 14, 2003, which resulted in the order dated June 10, 2003, are not properly before this Court since findings of fact are not separately appealable *(see*CPLR 5512; *Napolitano v Kaddoch,*275 AD2d 445 [2000]).

Without the transcript of the deposition at which the plaintiff allegedly admitted to improperly selling marital property, this Court cannot render an informed decision upon the propriety of the Supreme Court’s denial of that branch of the defendant’s motion which was to grant him a $158,000 credit against sup*936port arrears owed to the plaintiff because of the alleged sale *(see*CPLR 5526; *Gerhardt v New York City Tr. Auth.,*8 AD3d 427 [2004]; *Bernstein v Bernstein,*122 AD2d 96 [1986]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Crane, J.P., Goldstein, Rivera and Dillon, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2303 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2303

To define the term ``covered waste'' for purposes of the Department of 
 Defense prohibition on the disposal of certain waste in open-air burn 
                                 pits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 6, 2013

 Ms. Shea-Porter introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To define the term ``covered waste'' for purposes of the Department of 
 Defense prohibition on the disposal of certain waste in open-air burn 
                                 pits.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Save Our Soldiers' Lungs Act''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF PROHIBITION ON DISPOSING OF WASTE IN OPEN-AIR 
              BURN PITS.

    For the purposes of Department of Defense Instruction 4715.19, 
issued as required by section 317 of the National Defense Authorization 
Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Public Law 111-84; 10 U.S.C. 2701 note) or 
any successor instruction, the term ``covered waste'' specifically 
includes, in addition to the materials already specified in 
subparagraphs (A) and (B) of subsection (c)(2) of such section, the 
following:
            (1) Tires.
            (2) Treated wood.
            (3) Batteries.
            (4) Plastics, except insignificant amounts of plastic 
        remaining after a good-faith effort to remove or recover 
        plastic materials from the solid waste stream.
            (5) Munitions and explosives, the destruction of which is 
        covered in Department of Defense Instruction 6055.09-M 
        (Reference (i)).
            (6) Compressed gas cylinders, unless empty with valves 
        removed.
            (7) Fuel containers, unless completely evacuated of its 
        contents.
            (8) Aerosol cans.
            (9) Polychlorinated biphenyls.
            (10) Petroleum, oils, and lubricants products (other than 
        waste fuel for initial combustion).
            (11) Asbestos.
            (12) Mercury.
            (13) Foam tent material.
            (14) Any item containing any of the materials referred to 
        in a preceding paragraph.
                                 <all>
```
§ 205.607 Amending the National List. ( a ) Any person may petition the National Organic Standards Board for the purpose of having a substance evaluated by the Board for recommendation to the Secretary for inclusion on or deletion from the National List in accordance with the Act.
( b ) A person petitioning for amendment of the National List should request a copy of the petition procedures from the USDA at the address in § 205.607(c).
( c ) A petition to amend the National List must be submitted to: Program Manager, USDA-AMS-NOP, 1400 Independence Ave. SW., Room 2648 So. Bldg., Ag Stop 0268, Washington, DC 20250-0268.
[65 FR 80637, Dec. 21, 2000, as amended at 68 FR 61993, Oct. 31, 2003; 80 FR 6429, Feb. 5, 2015]
SCWC

- 22

- 0000456

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ‘ I

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR ADJUSTABLE

RATE MORTGAGE TRUST 2005

- 2, ADJUSTABLE RATE MORTGAGE

- BACKED

PASS

- THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005

- 2

, Respondent/Plaintiff

- Appellee

,

vs.

KELLY EDWARDS, aka KELLY ANNE EDWARDS,

individually and as Trustee of the Edwards Family

Trust U/D/T dated September 19, 1996,

Petitioner/Defendant

- Appellant,

and

THE ESTATE OF STUART D. EDWARDS, aka STUART DENZIL EDWARDS,

Respondent/Defendant

- Appell ee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP

- 22

- 0000456; CIVIL NO. 3CC15100031K)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ .)

The application for writ of certiorari, filed on

December 21, 2022, by petitioner/defendant/appellant Kelly

Edwards aka Kelly Anne Edwards is hereby rejected.

Dated: Honolulu, Hawai ʻ i , February 14 , 2023.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-22-0000456

14-FEB-2023

08:45 AM

Dkt. 11 ODAC
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Louise Jowdy v. Hermelinda Rossi, USAA, USAA County Mutual Insurance Company, USAA Casualty Insurance Company

Appellate case number: 01

- 19

- 00715

- CV

Trial court case number: 2017

- 43825

Trial court: 80th District Court of Harris County

Appellant filed a motion for extension on September 8, 2020, requesting a 21

- day extension of time to file appellant’s brief. The Court granted this extension on the same da y, noting that no further extensions would be granted. Later the same day, appellant filed another motion, this time requesting 30, rather than 21 days. Appellant requested this additional time in part because documents are missing from the clerk’s recor d and appellant is attempting to correct that.

Accordingly, the Court withdraws its ruling of September 8, 2020, granting the 21

- day extension and noting that no further extensions would be granted. Instead, the Court grants appellant’s latest motion and sets the new deadline for filing the brief as October 15, 2020 . No further extensions will be granted absent a showing of exceptional circumstances.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

____

/s/ Richard Hight ower

________  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __ September 15, 2020

___
# CI2021380EN.01000601.xml

| 20.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 380/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 380/6

---

Statement of the European Commission on the advisory nature of strategic boards as in in Article 12 of Regulation (EU) 2021/1529 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA III)

(2021/C 380 I/06)

The European Commission recalls that as laid down in Article 12 of the IPA III Regulation, the Western Balkans Investment Framework (WBIF) strategic board is an advisory body to the Commission. This is aligned with Article 33 of the NDICI – Global Europe Regulation (EU) 2021/947 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 June 2021, which refers to the WBIF and EFSD+ strategic boards. These strategic boards do not have decision-making powers in the context of the implementation of the EU budget. The Rules of Procedures for the WBIF strategic board will be established on this basis.

---
#### § 29.1006 Color intensity.

The varying degree of saturation or chroma. Color intensity as applied to tobacco describes the strength or weakness of a specific color or hue. (See Elements of Quality Chart.)
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10(v)


Myers Industries, Inc. Non-Employee Board of Directors Compensation Arrangement

         From January 2004 through June 2004, outside directors were paid a
$20,000 annual retainer plus $1,000 for each Board of Directors meeting
attended. Directors were also paid $1,000 for each Committee meeting attended.

         Effective June 24, 2004 and thereafter, the Board and Committee meeting
fees for outside directors were increased to $1,500, except for Committee
chairs, whose fees were increased to $2,000 for meetings of their Committees.

         Further, effective January 1, 2005, the annual retainer for Board
members was increased to $25,000, except for the Audit Committee chair, who
receives an annual retainer of $30,000.

         On February 17, 2005, the Compensation Committee awarded Keith E.
Brown, Chair of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, an additional
payment of $10,000 in recognition of the extensive time and effort expended by
him in 2004 as Chair of the Audit Committee.

         Under the Company's 1999 Stock Option Plan, each non-employee director
is awarded annually on the day of the Annual Meeting, a non-qualified stock
option to purchase 2,500 shares of Common Stock. The option price per share is
100 percent of the fair market value (being the closing price on the NYSE on the
day of grant) of a share of Common Stock.
Customer Service Hotline: 1

- 800

- 438

- 2474 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION III

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103

- 2029

December 15, 2014

The Honorable Dana Aunkst

Acting Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Pr otection

Rachel Carson State Office Building

P.O. Box 2063

Harrisburg, PA 17105

- 2063

Dear Acting Secretary Aunkst :

On September 9 , 2014

, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a

revision to the Pennsylvania State Implementation Plan (SI P) from the Pennsylvania Department

of Environmental Protection. Th e SIP revision request s redesignation from nonattainment to

a ttainment, and approval of the maintenance plan of the Allentown 2006 24

- hour PM 2.5 area

. EPA has determined that the submitta l is administratively and technical ly complete, and is

reviewing it to prepare Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.

If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Rose Quinto

, Office

of Air Program Planning

, at (215) 814

- 2 182 . She is th e principal contact for this rulemaking.

Sincerely,

/s/

David L. Arnold

, Acting Director

Air Protection Division

cc: Joyce E. Epps, Director, PADEP Bureau of Air Quality
#### § 301.52-9 Movement of live pink bollworms.

Regulations requiring a permit for, and otherwise governing the movement of live pink bollworms in interstate or foreign commerce are contained in the Federal Plant Pest regulations in part 330 of this chapter. Applications for permits for the movement of the pest may be made to the Deputy Administrator.
§ 3201.91 Dethatcher products. ( a ) *Definition.* Products used to remove non-decomposed plant material accumulated in grassy areas.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The Federal preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 87 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than November 19, 2013, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased dethatchers. By that date, Federal agencies that have the responsibility for drafting or reviewing specifications for products to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased dethatchers.
[77 FR 69386, Nov. 19, 2012]
#### § 301.52-2a [Reserved]
Department of Fish and Wildlife regan Fish Division 

3406 Cherry Avenue NE Theodore R. Kulongoski, Governor 

Salem, OR 97303 

(503) 947-6200 

Fax (503) 947-6202 

May 18,2009 

TTY (503) 947-6339 

www.dfw.state.or.us 

OREGON 

Mr. Kenneth Carver 

Washington County Health &Human Services 

Environmental Health Division Fish &Wildlife 

155 N. First Ave. 

Hillsboro, OR 97124-3072 

Mr. Toby Harris 

Washington County Health &Human Services 

155 N. First Ave 

Hillsboro, OR 97124-3072 

RE: 2009 Washington County Pesticide Use Plan 

Dear Mr. Carver and Mr. Harris: 

The Oregon Department ofFish and Wildlife has completed review ofthe Washington 

County (County) 2009 Pesticide Use Plan (plan) in accordance with ORS 452.140. 

Based on the information you supplied, your plan is approved with the following 

requirements: 

.•	 Label restrictions must be strictly adhered to and apply to sensitive areas including 

wetlands, ditches and irrigation canals connected to lakes and streams. 

•	 If an adulticide is used near sensitive areas as a result of disease detection or 

outbreak, we are confident that all care will be taken to protect sensitive fish and 

wildlife areas and resources. If aerial adulticiding is needed, the 2009 plan indicates 

ODFW and DHS will be contacted prior to implementation. Adulticides should be 

prevented from drifting into sensitive areas. 

•	 A 1OO-foot buffer along sensitive waterways should be maintained during 

adulticiding operations. 

•	 The County distributes Gambusia affinis (western mosquitofish) and has 

received an ODFW Fish Transportation Permit. Please provide ODFW's 

Gambusia Backgrounder (attached) to the public receiving Gambusia. 

This is also located at: 

http://www.dfw.state.or.us/fish/diseaseslbackgrounder WNV gambusi 

a.pdf 

•	 Prior to developing your plan next year, please contact Mischa Connine, 

ODFW District Habitat Biologist (503-621-3488, ext. 228) to coordinate 

on any new sensitive areas and possible issues related to them. 

51000-801000-06 
The 2009 plan shows considerable thought and concern about managing disease 

and mosquito vectors, as well as maintaining healthy fish and wildlife 

populations. Your 2008 Annual Report is thorough and provides excellent 

explanations and insight into the guiding principles, goals, objectives and actions 

ofthe county. 

If you have any questions, please call Jill Zamowitz at 503-947-6092, or Mischa 

Connine, at the number above. 

Thank you for your efforts protecting fish and wildlife resources while protecting human 

health through vector control efforts. 

Sincerely, 

/ 

Water Policy Coordinator 

Fish Division 

Attachment (Gambusia Backgrounder) 

Cc: (Bye-copy) 

Emilio DeBess, DHS, Portland 

Don VandeBerghIMischa Connine, North Willamette Watershed District, Sauvie 

Island 

Tom Murtagh, North Willamette Watershed District, Clackamas 

Jeff Boechler, North Willamette Watershed Manager, Clackamas 

Rick Kepler, Fish Division
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2013 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2013

To repeal the wage rate requirements commonly known as the Davis-Bacon 
                                  Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 16, 2013

    Mr. King of Iowa (for himself and Mr. Chaffetz) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 
                             the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal the wage rate requirements commonly known as the Davis-Bacon 
                                  Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Davis-Bacon Repeal Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF DAVIS-BACON WAGE REQUIREMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter IV of chapter 31 of title 40, United 
States Code, is repealed.
    (b) Reference.--Any reference in any law to a wage requirement of 
subchapter IV of chapter 31 of title 40, United States Code, shall 
after the date of the enactment of this Act be null and void.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE AND LIMITATION.

    The amendment made by section 2 shall take effect 30 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act but shall not affect any contract in 
existence on such date of enactment or made pursuant to invitation for 
bids outstanding on such date of enactment.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
10.51


 


Director Compensation


 


Non-employee
directors are entitled to receive the following compensation and stock options:


 


Base Compensation.  Sinclair directors who are also Sinclair
employees serve without additional compensation. Non-employee directors receive
$27,000 annually. The audit committee chairman receives an additional $4,500
annually and the compensation and stock option committee chairman receives an
additional $3,000 annually. Non-employee directors also receive $1,250 for each
meeting of the board of directors attended, $1,000 for each audit committee
meeting attended and $800 for each compensation and stock option committee
meeting attended.


 


Stock Options.  Each non-employee director receives a grant
of non-qualified stock options on the date of our annual meeting date to
purchase 5,000 shares of class A common stock pursuant to our non-qualified
stock option long-term incentive plan. Each stock option grant is immediately
vested with respect to 25% of the shares with the remaining shares vesting in
equal installments over a three year period. The exercise price of each option
grant is equal to the closing price of our class A common stock on the date of
our annual stockholders meeting.
§ 322.13 General requirements; restricted organisms. ( a ) For the purposes of this part, the following are restricted organisms: ( 1 ) Honeybee brood in the comb;
( 2 ) Adult honeybees from any region other than those listed in § 322.4(a);
( 3 ) Honeybee germ plasm from any region other than those listed in § 322.4(b); and
( 4 ) Bees other than honeybees, in any life stage, from any region other than those listed in § 322.4(c) or any species of bee other than those listed in § 322.5(d)(2).
( b ) Persons importing restricted organisms into the United States must be Federal, State, or university researchers; be at least 18 years of age; and be physically present during normal business hours at an address within the United States specified on the permit during any periods when articles are being imported or moved interstate under the permit. All such importations must be for research or experimental purposes and in accordance with this part.
[69 FR 61747, Oct. 21, 2004, as amended at 79 FR 19811, Apr. 10, 2014]
#### § 301.10 Definitions.

*Move (moved, movement).* Shipped, offered to a common carrier for shipment, received for transportation or transported by a common carrier, or carried, transported, moved, or allowed to be moved.

*State.* Any State, territory, district, or possession of the United States.
EXHIBIT 3.1(d)

                                                               STATE OF DELAWARE
                                                              SECRETARY OF STATE
                                                        DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS
                                                       FILED 09:00 AM 12/15/1994
                                                             944245972 - 2063399

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                        THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                                  INNOTEK, INC.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

            Adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242
            of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

          We,  Maryanne  Carroll,  President,  and  Luis  Mejia,  Secretary,  of
     INNOTEK,  INC., a corporation  organized and existing under the laws of the
     State of Delaware, do hereby certify as follows:


FIRST,  that the  Certificate  of  Incorporation  of said  corporation  has been
amended as follows:

          (a) By  striking  out the whole of  Article  FIRST  thereof  as it now
     exists and  inserting  in lieu and  instead  thereof a new  Article  FIRST,
     reading  as  follows:  "the  name  of  the  corporation   (hereinafter  the
     "corporation") is DermaRx Corporation."

         SECOND, that such amendment has been duly adopted in accordance with
the provisions of the General Corporation law of the State of Delaware by the
written consent of the holders of not less than a majority of the outstanding
stock entitled to vote thereon and that written notice of the corporate action
has been given to those stockholders who have not consented in writing, all in
accordance with the provision of Section 228 of the General Corporation Law of
the State of Delaware.



<PAGE>



         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have signed this certificate this 14th day of
December, 1994.


                                              /s/ Maryanne Carroll
                                              ---------------------------
                                              Maryanne Carroll, President


                                              /s/ Luis Mejia
                                              ---------------------------
                                              Luis Mejia, Secretary




                                       2