# PERMIT TO OPERATE

Under the authority of RSMo 643 and the Federal Clean Air Act the applicant is authorized to operate the air contaminant source(s) described below, in accordance with the laws, rules, and conditions set forth here in.



### Operating Permit Number: Expiration Date: Project Number: 2240-0030-014

Installation Name and Address Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 4201 North River Boulevard Sugar Creek, MO 64050 Jackson County

Parent Company's Name and Address Lafarge Corporation 4000 Town Center, Suite 2000 Southfield, MI 48075

Installation Description: Lafarge Corporation operates a limestone quarry and Portland cement plant in Sugar Creek, Missouri.

Effective Date Director or Designee Department of Natural Resources

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 2 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Table of Contents

I. I NSTALLATION 

### D ESCRIPTION AND 

### E QUIPMENT 

### L ISTING 

### ...................................................8

INSTALLATION DESCRIPTION.....................................................................................................8 EMISSION UNITS WITH LIMITATIONS.........................................................................................8 EMISSION UNITS WITHOUT LIMITATIONS................................................................................10 DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE ......................................................................10


### II. P LANT 

### W IDE 

### E MISSION 

### L IMITATIONS 

### .......................................................................11

Permit Condition PW001......................................................................................................11 10 CSR 10-6.170................................................................................................................ ........................... 11 Permit Condition PW002......................................................................................................12 10 CSR 10-6.250................................................................................................................ ........................... 12 Permit Condition PW003......................................................................................................12 10 CSR 10-6.080................................................................................................................ ........................... 12 40 CFR Part 61 Subpart M....................................................................................................... ..................... 12 Permit Condition PW004......................................................................................................13 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................... 13 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A...................................................................................................... ...................... 13 Permit Condition PW005......................................................................................................15 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................... 15 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A...................................................................................................... ...................... 15 Permit Condition PW006......................................................................................................16 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................... 16 Permit Condition PW007......................................................................................................18 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................... 18 Permit Condition PW008......................................................................................................19 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................... 19 

### III. E MISSION 

### U NIT 

### S PECIFIC 

### E MISSION 

### L IMITATIONS 

### .......................................................21 EU0010 through EU0040 ....................................................................................................21 Permit Condition EU0010-001 through EU0040-001...........................................................21 10 CSR 10-2.060................................................................................................................ ........................... 21 10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ........................... 21 EU0050 Through EU0070....................................................................................................22 Permit Condition EU0050-001 through EU0070-001...........................................................22 10 CSR 10-2.060................................................................................................................ ........................... 22 10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ........................... 22 EU0080 ......................................................................................................................... ......24 Permit Condition EU0080-001 .............................................................................................24 10 CSR 10-2.060................................................................................................................ ........................... 24 10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ........................... 24 Permit Condition EU0080-002 .............................................................................................25 10 CSR 10-2.030................................................................................................................ ........................... 25 EU0090 ......................................................................................................................... ......26 Permit Condition EU0090-001 .............................................................................................26 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................... 26 Permit Condition EU0090-002 .............................................................................................28 10 CSR 10-2.060................................................................................................................ ........................... 28 10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ........................... 28 Permit Condition EU0090-003 .............................................................................................29 10 CSR 10-2.030................................................................................................................ ........................... 29 EU0100 ......................................................................................................................... ......29

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 3 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0100-001 .............................................................................................29 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................... 29 Permit Condition EU0100-002 .............................................................................................31 10 CSR 10-2.060................................................................................................................ ........................... 31 10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ........................... 31 EU0110 ......................................................................................................................... ......32 Permit Condition EU0110-001 .............................................................................................32 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................... 32 Permit Condition EU0110-002 .............................................................................................34 10 CSR 10-2.060................................................................................................................ ........................... 34 10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ........................... 34 Permit Condition EU0110-003 .............................................................................................35 10 CSR 10-2.030................................................................................................................ ........................... 35 EU0120 ......................................................................................................................... ......35 Permit Condition EU0120-001 .............................................................................................35 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................... 35 Permit Condition EU0120-002 .............................................................................................37 10 CSR 10-2.060................................................................................................................ ........................... 37 10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ........................... 37 Permit Condition EU0120-003 .............................................................................................38 10 CSR 10-2.030................................................................................................................ ........................... 38 EU0130 ......................................................................................................................... ......39 Permit Condition EU0130-001 .............................................................................................39 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................... 39 Permit Condition EU0130-002 .............................................................................................41 10 CSR 10-2.060................................................................................................................ ........................... 41 10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ........................... 41 Permit Condition EU0130-003 .............................................................................................42 10 CSR 10-2.030................................................................................................................ ........................... 42 EU0140 through EU0160 and EU0190................................................................................43 Permit Condition EU0140-001 through EU0160-001 and EU0190-001 ...............................43 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................... 43 Permit Condition EU0140-002 through EU0160-002 and EU0190-002 ...............................45 10 CSR 10-2.060................................................................................................................ ........................... 45 10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ........................... 45 Permit Condition EU0140-003 through EU0160-003 and EU0190-003 ...............................46 10 CSR 10-2.030................................................................................................................ ........................... 46 EU0170 through EU0180 ....................................................................................................47 Permit Condition EU0170-001 through EU0180-001...........................................................47 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................... 47 Permit Condition EU0170-002 through EU0180-002...........................................................49 10 CSR 10-2.060................................................................................................................ ........................... 49 10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ........................... 49 Permit Condition EU0170-003 through EU0180-003...........................................................50 10 CSR 10-2.030................................................................................................................ ........................... 50 EU0200 ......................................................................................................................... ......51 Permit Condition EU0200-001 .............................................................................................51 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................... 51 Permit Condition EU0200-002 .............................................................................................53 10 CSR 10-2.060................................................................................................................ ........................... 53 10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ........................... 53 Permit Condition EU0200-003 .............................................................................................54 10 CSR 10-2.030................................................................................................................ ........................... 54 Permit Condition EU0200-004 .............................................................................................55 10 CSR 10-6.260................................................................................................................ ........................... 55

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 4 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

EU0210 through EU0230 and EU0260................................................................................55 Permit Condition EU0210-001 through EU0230-001 and EU0260-001 ...............................55 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................... 55 Permit Condition EU0210-002 through EU0230-002 and EU0260-002 ...............................57 10 CSR 10-2.060................................................................................................................ ........................... 57 10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ........................... 57 Permit Condition EU0210-003 through EU0230-003 and EU0260-003 ...............................58 10 CSR 10-2.030................................................................................................................ ........................... 58 EU0240 through EU0250 ....................................................................................................59 Permit Condition EU0240-001 through EU0250-001...........................................................59 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................... 59 Permit Condition EU0240-002 through EU0250-002...........................................................61 10 CSR 10-2.060................................................................................................................ ........................... 61 10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ........................... 61 Permit Condition EU0240-003 through EU0250-003...........................................................62 10 CSR 10-2.030................................................................................................................ ........................... 62 EU0270 ......................................................................................................................... ......63 Permit Condition EU0270-001 .............................................................................................63 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................... 63 Permit Condition EU0270-002 .............................................................................................65 10 CSR 10-2.060................................................................................................................ ........................... 65 10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ........................... 65 Permit Condition EU0270-003 .............................................................................................66 10 CSR 10-2.030................................................................................................................ ........................... 66 Permit Condition EU0270-004 .............................................................................................67 10 CSR 10-6.260................................................................................................................ ........................... 67 EU0280 through EU0300 ....................................................................................................67 Permit Condition EU0280-001 through EU0300-001...........................................................68 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................... 68 Permit Condition EU0280-002 through EU0300-002...........................................................70 10 CSR 10-2.060................................................................................................................ ........................... 70 10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ........................... 70 Permit Condition EU0280-003 through EU0300-003...........................................................71 10 CSR 10-2.030................................................................................................................ ........................... 71 EU0310 through EU0340 ....................................................................................................71 Permit Condition EU0310-001 through EU0340-001...........................................................71 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................... 71 Permit Condition EU0310-002 through EU0340-002...........................................................74 10 CSR 10-2.060................................................................................................................ ........................... 74 10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ........................... 74 EU0350 through EU0360 ....................................................................................................75 Permit Condition EU0350-001 through EU0360-001...........................................................75 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................... 75 Permit Condition EU0350-002 through EU0360-002...........................................................77 10 CSR 10-2.060................................................................................................................ ........................... 77 10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ........................... 77 Permit Condition EU0350-003 through EU00360-003.........................................................78 10 CSR 10-2.030................................................................................................................ ........................... 78 EU0370 through EU0380 ....................................................................................................78 Permit Condition EU0370-001 through EU0380-001...........................................................78 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................... 78 Permit Condition EU0370-002 through EU0380-002...........................................................81 10 CSR 10-2.030................................................................................................................ ........................... 81 Permit Condition EU0370-003 through EU0380-003...........................................................82 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................... 82

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 5 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0370-004 through EU0380-004...........................................................84 10 CSR 10-2.060................................................................................................................ ........................... 84 10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ........................... 84 Permit Condition EU0370-005 through EU0380-005...........................................................85 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................... 85 Permit Condition EU0370-006 through EU0380-006...........................................................88 10 CSR 10-6.060................................................................................................................ ........................... 88 Construction Permit No. 0891-005A.............................................................................................. ................ 88 Permit Condition EU0370-007 through EU0380-007...........................................................89 10 CSR 10-6.260................................................................................................................ ........................... 89 EU0390 through EU0400 ....................................................................................................90 Permit Condition EU0390-001 through EU0400-001...........................................................90 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................... 90 Permit Condition EU0390-002 through EU0400-002...........................................................92 10 CSR 10-2.030................................................................................................................ ........................... 92 Permit Condition EU0390-003 through EU0400-003...........................................................93 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................... 93 Permit Condition EU0390-004 through EU0400-004...........................................................95 10 CSR 10-2.060................................................................................................................ ........................... 95 10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ........................... 95 EU0410 through EU0470 ....................................................................................................96 Permit Condition EU0410-001 through EU0470-001...........................................................96 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................... 96 Permit Condition EU0410-002 through EU0470-002...........................................................98 10 CSR 10-2.060................................................................................................................ ........................... 98 10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ........................... 98 Permit Condition EU0410-003 through EU0470-003...........................................................99 10 CSR 10-2.030................................................................................................................ ........................... 99 EU0480 through EU0490 ....................................................................................................99 Permit Condition EU0480-001 through EU0490-001...........................................................99 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................... 99 Permit Condition EU0480-002 through EU0490-002.........................................................101 10 CSR 10-2.060................................................................................................................ ......................... 101 10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ......................... 101 Permit Condition EU0480-003 through EU0490-003.........................................................102 10 CSR 10-2.030................................................................................................................ ......................... 102 EU0500 through EU0510 ..................................................................................................103 Permit Condition EU0500-001 through EU0510-001.........................................................103 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................. 103 Permit Condition EU0500-002 through EU0510-002.........................................................105 10 CSR 10-2.060................................................................................................................ ......................... 105 10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ......................... 105 Permit Condition EU0500-003 through EU0510-003.........................................................106 10 CSR 10-2.030................................................................................................................ ......................... 106 EU0520 through EU0530 ..................................................................................................107 Permit Condition EU0520-001 through EU0540-001.........................................................107 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................. 107 Permit Condition EU0520-002 through EU0540-002.........................................................109 10 CSR 10-2.060................................................................................................................ ......................... 109 10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ......................... 109 Permit Condition EU0520-003 through EU0540-003.........................................................110 10 CSR 10-2.030................................................................................................................ ......................... 110 EU0550 through EU0560 ..................................................................................................111 Permit Condition EU0550-001 through EU0560-001.........................................................111 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................. 111

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 6 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

Permit Condition EU0550-002 through EU0560-002.........................................................113 10 CSR 10-2.060................................................................................................................ ......................... 113 10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ......................... 113 Permit Condition EU0550-003 through EU0560-003.........................................................114 10 CSR 10-2.030................................................................................................................ ......................... 114 EU0570 through EU0580 ..................................................................................................115 Permit Condition EU0570-001 through EU0580-001.........................................................115 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................. 115 Permit Condition EU0570-002 through EU0580-002.........................................................117 10 CSR 10-2.060................................................................................................................ ......................... 117 10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ......................... 117 Permit Condition EU0570-003 through EU0580-003.........................................................118 10 CSR 10-2.030................................................................................................................ ......................... 118 EU0590 through EU0600 ..................................................................................................119 Permit Condition EU0590-001 through EU0600-001.........................................................119 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................. 119 Permit Condition EU0590-002 through EU0600-002.........................................................121 10 CSR 10-2.060................................................................................................................ ......................... 121 10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ......................... 121 Permit Condition EU0590-003 through EU0600-003.........................................................122 10 CSR 10-2.030................................................................................................................ ......................... 122 EU0610 through EU0690 ..................................................................................................123 Permit Condition EU0610-001 through EU0690-001.........................................................123 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL .................................................................................................... .................. 123 Permit Condition EU0610-002 through EU0690-002.........................................................125 10 CSR 10-2.060................................................................................................................ ......................... 125 10 CSR 10-6.220................................................................................................................ ......................... 125 Permit Condition EU0610-003 through EU0690-003.........................................................126 10 CSR 10-2.030................................................................................................................ ......................... 126 EU0700 ......................................................................................................................... ....126 Permit Condition EU0700-001 ...........................................................................................126 10 CSR 10-6.070................................................................................................................ ......................... 126 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart Kb...................................................................................................... ................... 126 EU0710 ......................................................................................................................... ....127 Permit Condition EU0710-001 ...........................................................................................127 10 CSR 10-2.260................................................................................................................ ......................... 127 EU0720 ......................................................................................................................... ....128 Permit Condition EU0720-001 ...........................................................................................128 10 CSR 10-6.070................................................................................................................ ......................... 128 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart Kb...................................................................................................... ................... 128 EU0730 ......................................................................................................................... ....129 Permit Condition EU0730-001 ...........................................................................................129 10 CSR 10-2.210................................................................................................................ ......................... 129 

### IV. C ORE 

### P ERMIT 

### R EQUIREMENTS 

### .............................................................................130

V. G ENERAL 

### P ERMIT 

### R EQUIREMENTS 

### ........................................................................133

Permit Duration ................................................................................................................ ......133 General Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements .............................................................133 Risk Management Plans Under Section 112(r) .........................................................................134 Severability Clause............................................................................................................ ......134 General Requirements........................................................................................................... ..134 Incentive Programs Not Requiring Permit Revisions.................................................................135 Title VI....................................................................................................................... ..............135

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 7 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

Compliance Requirements.......................................................................................................1 36 Permit Shield.................................................................................................................. .........137 Emergency Provisions........................................................................................................... ...137 Operational Flexibility ........................................................................................................ .....138 Off-Permit Changes ............................................................................................................. ....138 Responsible Official ........................................................................................................... ......139 Statement of Basis ............................................................................................................. .....139 Attachment A................................................................................................................... ........................... 140 Attachment B................................................................................................................... ........................... 141

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 8 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## I. Installation Description and Equipment Listing

INSTALLATION DESCRIPTION Lafarge Corporation operates a limestone quarry and Portland cement plant in Sugar Creek, Missouri. The plant produces portland cement. Quarrying and cement manufacturing has occurred at this location since approximately 1905.

EMISSION UNITS WITH LIMITATIONS The following list provides a description of the equipment at this installation which emit air pollutants and which are identified as having unit-specific emission limitations.

Emission Unit # Description of Emission Unit EU0010 Primary Crusher EU0020 Primary Crusher to Secondary Crusher Conveyor (#1 Belt) EU0030 Post Secondary Screen EU0040 Silo Conveyor (#3 Belt) EU0050 #1 Belt Unloading to Secondary Crusher EU0060 Secondary Crusher EU0070 Screen Conveyor (#2 Belt) EU0080 Rock/Clay Silo (#3 Belt Unloading to Silo) EU0090 Alternate Raw Material Silo EU0100 Mill Scale & Gypsum Unloading Station EU0110 Mill Scale Silo (Conveyor Transfer Point) EU0120 Alternate Raw Material Transfer Station EU0130 Mill Feed Silo Building EU0140 Raw Mill #1 – Conveyor (to feed belt) EU0150 Raw Mill #1 – Feed Belt EU0160 Raw Mill #1 – Weigh Hopper EU0170 Raw Mill #1 – Grinder EU0180 Raw Mill #1 – Air Separator EU0190 Raw Mill #1 – Unloading (Airslide to Raw Mix Pumps) EU0200 Raw Mill #1 – 10 MMBtu/hr Natural Gas Fired Dryer EU0210 Raw Mill #2 – Conveyor (to feed belt) EU0220 Raw Mill #2 – Feed Belt EU0230 Raw Mill #2 – Weigh Hopper EU0240 Raw Mill #2 – Grinder EU0250 Raw Mill #2 – Air Separator EU0260 Raw Mill #2 – Unloading (Airslide to Raw Mix Pumps) EU0270 Raw Mill #2 – 10 MMBtu/hr Natural Gas Fired Dryer EU0280 Blend Silos (Raw Mix Unloading to Blend Silos) EU0290 Blend Conveyor (Raw Mix Transfer to Kiln Feed Leveling Box) EU0300 Kiln Feed Leveling Box (Raw Mix Unloading to Kiln Feed Leveling Box) EU0310 Coal/Coke Unloader/Transfer Conveyor EU0320 Fuel Grinding Mills

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 9 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

Emission Unit # Description of Emission Unit EU0330 Transfer Conveyor Unloading to Fuel Hopper EU0340 Fuel Silos (Fuel Hopper Unloading to Fuel Silo Conveyor) EU0350 Coal Silo (Coal Unloading from Conveyor to Silos) EU0360 Coke/Non Hazardous Waste Fuel Substitute Silo (Unloading from Conveyor to Silos) EU0370 Rotary Cement Kiln #1 EU0380 Rotary Cement Kiln #2 EU0390 Clinker Cooler #1 EU0400 Clinker Cooler #2 EU0410 Clinker Roll Crusher EU0420 Clinker Reclaim & Transfer Station (Unloading Mine or Purchased Clinker to Silo) EU0430 Clinker Transfer from Roll Crusher to Silos (#7 Belt) EU0440 Clinker Silos (Clinker Unloading to Silos) EU0450 Clinker Loadout Station #1 (Clinker Unloading from Silos to Truck) EU0460 Clinker Loadout Station #2 (Clinker Unloading from Silos to Truck) EU0470 Gypsum Silos (Transfer Conveyor Unloading to Gypsum Silos) EU0480 Finish Mill #1 Feed Belt EU0490 Finish Mill #1 Weigh Hopper EU0500 Finish Mill #1 Grinder EU0510 Finish Mill #1 Cement Air Separator EU0520 Finish Mill #2 Feed Belt EU0530 Finish Mill #2 Weigh Hopper EU0540 Finish Mill Fringe Tank EU0550 Finish Mill #2 Grinder EU0560 Finish Mill #2 Cement Air Separator EU0570 Finish Mill #3 Feed Belt (Belt 12A) EU0580 Finish Mill #3 Weigh Hopper EU0590 Finish Mill #3 Grinder EU0600 Finish Mill #3 Cement Air Separator EU0610 Cement Storage Silos Transfer Point (Cement Transfer to Storage Silos) EU0620 Pneumatic Cement Conveyor #1 EU0630 Pneumatic Cement Conveyor #2 EU0640 Cement Unloading Silos - Truck #1 EU0650 Cement Unloading Silos – Truck #2 EU0660 Barge Loadout Station EU0670 Railcar Loadout Station EU0680 Truck Loadout Station #1 EU0690 Truck Loadout Station #2 EU0700 50,300 Gallon Ethanolamine Fixed Roof Storage Tank EU0710 8,000 Gallon Gasoline RVP-13 Underground Storage Tank EU0720 12,000 Gallon #2 Fuel (Diesel) Oil Underground Storage Tank EU0730 Safety-Kleen Parts Washers (Degreasing Units)

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 10 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

EMISSION UNITS WITHOUT LIMITATIONS The following list provides a description of the equipment that does not have unit specific limitations at the time of permit issuance.

Description of Emission Source Quarry (EP-1, 1998 EIQ) - Top Soil Removal, Hauling, Stockpile, Loading /Unloading; Drilling & Blasting; Shale Removal, Hauling, Stockpile, Loading /Unloading; and Rock Removal, Hauling, Stockpile Loading/Unloading Sewage Treatment Plant (EP-0, 1998 EIQ) Clay Stockpile (EP-2, 1998 EIQ) Primary Crusher (EP-3, 1998 EIQ) – Rock/Clay Unloading to Primary Crusher Paved Roads (EP-49, 1998 EIQ) Unpaved Roads (EP-50, 1998 EIQ) Two (2) 1.33 MMBtu/hr Each Natural Gas Fired Boilers (EP54 & EP-55, 1998 EIQ) Raw Material and Coal/Coke Stockpiles Laboratory Fume Hoods (EP-56, 1998 EIQ) 20 Natural Gas Fired Space Heaters (0.5 MMBtu/hr each)

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE These documents have been incorporated by reference into this permit.

1) Permit to Construct, Permit No. 0991-005A

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 11 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## II. Plant Wide Emission Limitations
The installation shall comply with each of the following emission limitations. Consult the appropriate sections in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and Code of State Regulations (CSR) for the full text of the applicable requirements.


## Permit Condition PW001 10 CSR 10-6.170 Restriction of Particulate Matter to the Ambient Air Beyond the Premises of Origin

Emission Limitation: No person may cause or allow to occur any handling, transporting or storing of any material; construction, repair, cleaning or demolition of a building or its appurtenances; construction or use of a road, driveway or open area; or operation of a commercial or industrial installation without applying reasonable measures as may be required to prevent, or in a manner which allows or may allow, fugitive particulate matter to go beyond the premises of origin in quantities that the particulate matter:

• Remains visible in the ambient air beyond the property line of origin; or

• May be found on surfaces beyond the property line of origin. The nature or origin of the particulate matter shall be determined by microscopy or other technique proven to be equally accurate and approved by the Director. Monitoring: The permittee shall conduct inspections of its facilities sufficient to determine compliance with this regulation. If a violation of this regulation is discovered, the source shall undertake corrective action to eliminate the violation. The following monitoring schedule must be maintained: Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period then-

• Observations must be made once every two weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period then-

• Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in an identical manner to the initial monitoring frequency. Record Keeping: A log must be maintained noting the following:

• Whether air emissions (except water vapor) remain visible in the ambient air beyond the property line of origin.

• Whether the visible emissions were normal for the installation.

• Equipment malfunctions that could cause an exceedance of 10 CSR 10-6.170.

• Any violations of 10 CSR 10-6.170 and any corrective actions undertaken to correct the violation. Attachment A contains a log including these record keeping requirements. This log, or an equivalent created by the permittee, must be used to certify compliance with this requirement. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than 10 days after any exceedance of any of the terms imposed by this regulation, or any malfunction which could possibly cause an exceedance of this regulation.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 12 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition PW002

10 CSR 10-6.250 Asbestos Abatement Projects – Certification, Accreditation, and Business Exemption Requirements

Emission Limitation: The permittee shall conduct all asbestos abatement projects within the procedures established for certification and accreditation by 10 CSR 10-6.250.

• An individual must receive certification from the department before that individual participates in an asbestos abatement project operating in Missouri according to Section (3). This certification is annually renewable. Certification as an AHERA inspector, AHERA management planner and AHERA project designer apply to AHERA-related projects.

• To be a training provider for the purpose of this rule a school shall apply for accreditation to the department and comply with the United States Environmental Protection Agency AHERA Model Accreditation plan 40 CFR part 763 Appendix C, subpart E. Details of the requirements for accreditation are found in Section (4). Monitoring: Any appropriate monitoring to demonstrate compliance with Certification and Accreditation standards. Record Keeping: Any appropriate record keeping to demonstrate compliance with Certification and Accreditation standards. Reporting: Any appropriate reporting to demonstrate compliance with Certification and Accreditation standards.



## Permit Condition PW003 10 CSR 10-6.080 Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants 

### 40 CFR Part 61 Subpart M National Emission Standard for Asbestos

Emission Limitation: The permittee shall follow the procedures and requirements of 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M for any activities occurring at this installation which would be subject to provisions for 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M, National Emission Standard for Asbestos

. Monitoring: Any appropriate monitoring to demonstrate compliance with registration, certification, notification, and Abatement Procedures and Practices standards as specified in 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M. Record Keeping: Any appropriate record keeping as specified in 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M. Reporting: Any appropriate reporting as specified in 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 13 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition PW004

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction Plan §63.1354(b)(4) and (b)(5) 

### 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A General Provisions – Startup, Shutdown and Malfunction Plan §63.6(e)(3)

Emission Limitation: The owner or operator of an affected source shall develop and implement a written startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan that describes, in detail, procedures for operating and maintaining the source during periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction and a program of corrective action for malfunctioning process and air pollution control equipment used to comply with the relevant standard. As required under §63.8(c)(1)(i), the plan shall identify all routine or otherwise predictable continuous monitoring system (CMS) malfunctions. This plan shall be developed by the owner or operator by the source’s compliance date for that relevant standard. The plan shall be incorporated by reference into the source’s title V permit. The purpose of the startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan is to:

• Ensure that, at all times, owners or operators operate and maintain affected sources including associated air pollution control equipment, in a manner consistent with good air pollution control practices for minimizing emissions at least to the levels required by all relevant standards;

• Ensure that owners or operators are prepared to correct malfunctions as soon as practicable after their occurrence in order to minimize excess emissions of hazardous air pollutants; and

• Reduce the reporting burden associated with periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction (including corrective action taken to restore malfunctioning process and air pollution control equipment to its normal or usual manner of operation). (§63.6(e)(3)(i)) Monitoring: During periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction, the owner or operator of an affected source shall operate and maintain such source (including associated air pollution control equipment) in accordance with the procedures specified in the startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan developed under paragraph (e)(3)(i) of this section. (§63.6(e)(3)(ii)) Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall keep a copy of the startup, shutdown, malfunction plan on-site at all times. The plan shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of Natural Resources personnel upon request.

• When actions taken by the owner or operator during a startup, shutdown, or malfunction (including actions taken to correct a malfunction) are consistent with the procedures specified in the startup, shutdown and malfunction plan, the owner or operator shall keep records for that event that demonstrate the procedures specified in the plan were followed. These records may take the form of a “checklist,” or other effective form of record keeping, that confirms conformance with the startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan for that event. In addition the owner or operator shall keep records of these events as specified in §63.10(b) (and elsewhere in this part), including records of the occurrence and duration of each startup, shutdown, or malfunction operation and each malfunction of the air pollution control equipment. (§63.6(e)(3)(iii))

• If an action taken by the owner or operator during a startup, shutdown, or malfunction (including an action taken to correct a malfunction) is not consistent with the procedures

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 14 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

specified in the startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan, the owner or operator shall record the actions taken for that event. ((§63.6(e)(3)(iv)) Reporting:

• As required by §63.10(d)(5), if actions taken by an owner or operator during a startup, shutdown, or malfunction of an affected source (including actions taken to correct a malfunction) are consistent with the procedures specified in the source’s startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan specified in §63.6(e)(3), the owner or operator shall state such information in a semiannual report. Reports shall only be required if a startup, shutdown, or malfunction occurred during the reporting period. The startup, shutdown, and malfunction report may be submitted simultaneously with the excess emissions and continuous monitoring system performance reports; and (§63.1354(b)(4))

• Any time an action taken by an owner or operator during a startup, shutdown, or malfunction (including actions taken to correct a malfunction) is not consistent with the procedures in the startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan, the owner or operator shall make an immediate report of the actions taken for that event within 2 working days, by telephone call or facsimile (FAX) transmission. The immediate report shall be followed by a letter, certified by the owner or operator or other responsible official, explaining the circumstances of the event, the reasons for not following the startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan, and whether any excess emissions and/or parameter monitoring exceedances are believed to have occurred. (§63.1354(b)(5))

The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 15 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition PW005

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Operations and Maintenance Plan §63.1350(a) and (b) 

### 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A General Provisions – Operation and Maintenance Requirements §63.6(e)(1) and (2)

Emission Limitation:

• The owner or operator of each portland cement plant shall prepare for each affected source subject to the provisions of this subpart, a written operations and maintenance plan. The plan shall include the following information: (1) Procedures for proper operation and maintenance of the affected source and air pollution control devices in order to meet the emission limits and operating limits of §§63.1343 through 63.1348; (2) Corrective actions to be taken when required by paragraph (e) of this section; (3) Procedures to be used during an inspection of the components of the combustion system of each kiln and each in-line kiln raw mill located at the facility at least once per year; and (4) Procedures to be used to periodically monitor affected sources subject to opacity standards under §§63.1346 and 63.1348. Such procedures must include the provisions of paragraphs (a)(4)(i) through (a)(4)(iv) of this section. (i) The owner or operator must conduct a monthly 1-minute visible emissions test of each affected source in accordance with Method 22 of Appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The test must be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (ii) If no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests for any affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semi-annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests. (iii) If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affectedsource, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semiannually to annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible emission are observed in six consecutive monthly test. (iv) If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must conduct a 6-minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The Method 9 test must begin within one hour of any observation of visible emissions. (§63.1350(a))

• Failure to comply with any provision of the operations and maintenance plan developed in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section shall be a violation of the standard. (§63.1350(b))

• Operation and maintenance requirements established pursuant to section 112 of the Act are enforceable independent of emissions limitations or other requirements in relevant standards. (§63.6(e)(1)(iii))

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 16 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

Monitoring:

• At all times, including periods of startup, shutdown, and malfunction, owners or operators shall operate and maintain any affected source, including associated air pollution control equipment, in a manner consistent with good air pollution control practices for minimizing emissions at least to the levels required by all relevant standards. (§63.6(e)(1)(i))

• Malfunctions shall be corrected as soon as practicable after their occurrence in accordance with the startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan required in §63.6(e)(3) of this section. (§63.6(e)(1)(ii)) Record Keeping: As specified in the Operations and Maintenance Plan. Reporting:

• The plan shall be submitted to the Administrator for review and approval as part of the application for a part 70 permit. (§63.1350(a))

• All failures to comply with any provision of the operation and maintenance plan developed in accordance with §63.1350(a) shall be included in the semiannual summary report. (§63.1354(b)(9)(v)) The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]



## Permit Condition PW006 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Notification Requirements §63.1353, Reporting Requirements §63.1354(a) and Record keeping Requirements §63.1355(a) and (b)

Emission Limitation:

• The notification provisions of 40 CFR part 63, subpart A that apply and those that do not apply to owners and operators of affected sources subject to this subpart are listed in Table 1 of this subpart. If any State requires a notice that contains all of the information required in a notification listed in this section, the owner or operator may send the Administrator a copy of the notice sent to the State to satisfy the requirements of this section for that notification.

• Each owner or operator subject to the requirements of this subpart shall comply with the notification requirements in §63.9 as listed below. Monitoring: None Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche.

• The owner or operators shall maintain records for each affected source as required by §63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3) of this part; and

(1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status under §63.9; (2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and (3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping or reporting requirements

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 17 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

Reporting:

• Initial notifications as required by §63.9(b) through (d). For the purposes of this subpart, a Title V or 40 CFR part 70 permit application may be used in lieu of the initial notification required under §63.9(b), provided the same information is contained in the permit application as required by §63.9(b), and the State to which the permit application has been submitted has an approved operating permit program under part 70 of this chapter and has received delegation of authority from the EPA. Permit applications shall be submitted by the same due dates as those specified for the initial notification.

• Notification of performance tests, as required by §§63.7 and 63.9(e).

• Notification of opacity and visible emission observations required by §63.1349 in accordance with §§63.6(h)(5) and 63.9(f).

• Notification, as required by §63.9(g), of the date that the continuous emission monitor performance evaluation required by §63.8(e) is scheduled to begin.

• Notification of compliance status, as required by §63.9(h).

• The reporting provisions of subpart A of this part that apply and those that do not apply to owners or operators of affected sources subject to this subpart are listed in Table 1 of this subpart. If any State requires a report that contains all of the information required in a report listed in this section, the owner or operator may send the Administrator a copy of the report sent to the State to satisfy the requirements of this section for that report. (§63.1354(a))

• As required by §63.10(d)(4), the owner or operator of an affected source who is required to submit progress reports as a condition of receiving an extension of compliance under §63.6(i) shall submit such reports by the dates specified in the written extension of compliance. (§63.1354(b)(3))

• The owner or operator shall submit a summary report semiannually which contains the information specified in §63.10(e)(3)(vi). In addition, the summary report shall include (§63.1354(b)(9): (1) All exceedences of maximum control device inlet gas temperature limits specified in §63.1344(a) and (b); (§63.1354(b)(9)(i) (2) All failures to calibrate thermocouples and other temperature sensors as required under §63.1350(f)(7); and (§63.1354(b)(9)(ii)) (3) All failures to maintain the activated carbon injection rate, and the activated carbon injection carrier gas flow rate or pressure drop, as applicable, as required under §63.1344(c). (§63.1354(b)(9)(iii) (4) The results of any combustion system component inspections conducted within the reporting period as required under §63.1350(i). (§63.1354(b)(9)(iv)) (5) All failures to comply with any provision of the operation and maintenance plan developed in accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1354(b)(9)(v))

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 18 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition PW007

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Performance Testing Requirements §63.1349

Emission Limitation: The owner or operator of any affected source subject to this subpart shall demonstrate initial compliance with the emission limits of §63.1343 and §63.1345 through §63.1348 using the test methods and procedures in §63.1349(b) and §63.7. (§63.1349(a)) Performance Testing: Performance tests to demonstrate initial compliance with this subpart shall be conducted as specified in §63.1349(b)(1) through §63.1349(b)(4). (§63.1349(b)) Monitoring: As required by the test methods and procedures in §63.1349(b) and §63.7. Record Keeping: As required by the test methods and procedures in §63.1349(b) and §63.7 Reporting:

• Performance test results shall be documented in complete test reports that contain the information required by §63.1349(a)(1) through (a)(10) of this section, as well as all other relevant information. The plan to be followed during testing shall be made available to the Administrator prior to testing, if requested. (§63.1349(a))

• A brief description of the process and the air pollution control system; (§63.1349(a)(1))

• Sampling location description(s); (§63.1349(a)(2))

• A description of sampling and analytical procedures and any modification to standard procedures; (§63.1349(a)(3))

• Test results; (§63.1349(a)(4))

• Quality assurance procedures and results; (§63.1349(a)(5))

• Records of operating conditions during the test, preparation of standards, and calibration procedures; (§63.1349(a)(6))

• Raw data sheets for field sampling and field and laboratory analyses; (§63.1349(a)(7))

• Documentation of calculation; (§63.1349(a)(8))

• All data recorded and used to establish parameters for compliance monitoring; and (§63.1349(a)(9))

• Any other information required by the test method. (§63.1349(a)(10)) The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 19 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition PW008

40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Alternate Monitoring Requirements §63.1350

Emission Limitation:

• An owner or operator may submit an application to the Administrator for approval of alternate monitoring requirements to demonstrate compliance with the emission standards of this subpart, except for emission standards for THC, subject to the provisions of §63.1350(l)(1) through (l)(6). (§63.1350(l))

• The Administrator may decide at any time, on a case-by-case basis that additional or alternative operating limits, or alternative approaches to establishing operating limits, are necessary to demonstrate compliance with the emission standards of this subpart. (§63.1350(l)(6)) Monitoring: If the application to use an alternate monitoring requirement is approved, the owner or operator must continue to use the original monitoring requirement until approval is received to use another monitoring requirement. (§63.1350(l)(2)) Record Keeping: If the application to use an alternate monitoring requirement is approved, the owner or operator must continue to use the original record keeping requirements for the original monitoring requirements until approval is received to use another monitoring requirement. Reporting:

• The Administrator will not approve averaging periods other than those specified in this section, unless the owner or operator documents, using data or information, that the longer averaging period will ensure that emissions do not exceed levels achieved during the performance test over any increment of time equivalent to the time required to conduct three runs of the performance test. (§63.1350(l)(1))

• The owner or operator shall submit the application for approval of alternate monitoring requirements no later than the notification of performance test. The application must contain the information specified in §63.1350(l)(3)(i) through (l)(3)(iii): (§63.1350(l)(3) (1) Data or information justifying the request, such as the technical or economic infeasibility, or the impracticality of using the required approach. (§63.1350(l)(3)(i)) (2) A description of the proposed alternative monitoring requirement, including the operating parameter to be monitored, the monitoring approach and technique, the averaging period for the limit, and how the limit is to be calculated; and (§63.1350(l)(3)(ii)) (3) Data or information documenting that the alternative monitoring requirement would provide equivalent or better assurance of compliance with the relevant emission standard. (§63.1350(l)(3)(iii)

• The Administrator will notify the owner or operator of the approval or denial of the application within 90 calendar days after receipt of the original request, or within 60 calendar days of the receipt of any supplementary information, whichever is later. The Administrator will not approve an alternate monitoring application unless it would provide equivalent or better assurance of compliance with the relevant emission standard. Before disapproving any alternate monitoring application, the Administrator will provide (§63.1350(l)(4)):

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 20 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

(1) Notice of the information and findings upon which the intended disapproval is based; and (§63.1350(l)(4)(i)) (2) Notice of opportunity for the owner or operator to present additional supporting information before final action is taken on the application. This notice will specify how much additional time is allowed for the owner or operator to provide additional supporting information. (§63.1350(l)(4)(ii))

• The owner or operator is responsible for submitting any supporting information in a timely manner to enable the Administrator to consider the application prior to the performance test. Neither submittal of an application, nor the Administrator’s failure to approve or disapprove the application relieves the owner or operator of the responsibility to comply with any provision of this subpart. (§63.1350(l)(5)) The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 21 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## III. Emission Unit Specific Emission Limitations

The installation shall comply with each of the following emission limitations. Consult the appropriate sections in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and Code of State Regulations (CSR) for the full text of the applicable requirements.


## EU0010 through EU0040 EU0010 – Primary Crusher EU0020 – Primary Crusher to Secondary Crusher Conveyor (#1 Belt) EU0030 – Post Secondary Screen EU0040 – Silo Conveyor (#3 Belt)

General Description: Primary Crushing System (including crusher, conveyors and screen). Installed: 1952. Control Device: Enclosure Manufacturer/Model #: Taylor EIQ Reference # (Year): EP-4 (1998)


## Permit Condition EU0010-001 through EU0040-001
10 CSR 10-2.060 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants 

### 10 CSR 10-6.220 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation: No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity. Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained: 1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 22 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer. Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting: 1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units, 2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and 3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition. Reporting : The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.


## EU0050 Through EU0070 EU0050 – #1 Belt Unloading to Secondary Crusher EU0060 – Secondary Crusher EU0070 – Screen Conveyor (#2 Belt)

General Description: Secondary Crushing System (including unloader, crusher and conveyor). Installed: 1952. Control Device: EU0050 & EU0070 -Enclosure; EU0060 – Fabric Filter Baghouse Manufacturer/Model #: Pennsylvania EIQ Reference # (Year): EP-5 (1998)

General Description: Rock/Clay Silos, Conveyors and Loading/Unloading Installed: 1952-1954. Control Device: Enclosure Manufacturer/Model #: EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-6


## Permit Condition EU0050-001 through EU0070-001
10 CSR 10-2.060 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants 

### 10 CSR 10-6.220 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 23 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

Emission Limitation: No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity. Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained: 1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer. Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting: 1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units, 2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and 3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 24 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## EU0080 Rock/Clay Silo (#3 Belt Unloading to Silo)

General Description: Rock/Clay Silo, Conveyors and Loading/Unloading Installed: 1952-1954. Control Device: Enclosure Manufacturer/Model #: EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-6



## Permit Condition EU0080-001
10 CSR 10-2.060 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants 

### 10 CSR 10-6.220 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation: No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity. Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained: 1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer. Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting: 1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units, 2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and 3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 25 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.



## Permit Condition EU0080-002
10 CSR 10-2.030 Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation: The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of 63 lbs/hr from this emission unit. Monitoring: None Record Keeping: None Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 26 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## EU0090 Alternate Raw Material Silos

General Description: Alternate Raw Material Silos and Conveyors Installed: 1952-1954 Control Device: Baghouse Manufacturer/Model #: EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-7



## Permit Condition EU0090-001 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation:The owner or operator shall not cause to be discharged any gases from the catalyst/nonhazardous waste silos, conveying system transfer point; and bulk loading or unloading system which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent. (§63.1348) Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the raw material storage bin; conveying system transfer point; and bulk loading or unloading system opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when the raw material storage bin; conveying system transfer point; and bulk loading or unloading system is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The maximum six-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to determine whether the raw material storage bin; conveying system transfer point; and bulk loading or unloading system is in initial compliance with the standard. The duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be 3-hours (30 6-minute averages), except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to 1-hour if the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)): (1) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i)); (2) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent for the first 1-hour period. (§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five years. (§63.1349(c)) Monitoring:

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly 1-minute visible emissions test of each affected source in accordance with Method 22 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The test must be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests for any affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semi-annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual test, the

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 27 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must conduct a 6-minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The Method 9 test must begin within one hour of any observation of visible emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv)) Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by §63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b)) (1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1)) (2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and (§63.1355(b)(2)) (3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3)) Reporting: As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2)) The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 28 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0090-002

10 CSR 10-2.060 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants 

### 10 CSR 10-6.220 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation: No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity. Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained: 1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer. Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting: 1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units, 2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and 3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 29 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0090-003

10 CSR 10-2.030 Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation: The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of 30.5 lbs/hr from each Silo (catalyst and non-hazardous waste silos) transfer point. Monitoring: None Record Keeping: None Reporting: The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.



## EU0100 Mill Scale & Gypsum Unloading Station

General Description: Mill Scale & Gypsum Unloading Station Installed: 1952-1954 Control Device: None (Fugitive) Manufacturer/Model #: EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-8



## Permit Condition EU0100-001 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation: The owner or operator shall not cause to be discharged any gases from the mill scale and gypsum unloading station which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent. (§63.1348) Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the mill scale and gypsum unloading station opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when the mill scale and gypsum unloading station is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The maximum six-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to determine whether the mill scale and gypsum unloading station is in initial compliance with the standard. The duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be 3-hours (30 6-minute averages), except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to 1-hour if the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)): (1) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i));

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 30 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

(2) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent for the first 1-hour period. (§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five years. (§63.1349(c)) Monitoring:

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly 1-minute visible emissions test of each affected source in accordance with Method 22 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The test must be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests for any affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semi-annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must conduct a 6-minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The Method 9 test must begin within one hour of any observation of visible emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv)) Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by §63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b)) (1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1)) (2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and (§63.1355(b)(2)) (3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3)) Reporting: As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2)) The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 31 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0100-002

10 CSR 10-2.060 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants 

### 10 CSR 10-6.220 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation: No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity. Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained: 1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer. Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting: 1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units, 2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and 3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 32 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## EU0110 Mill Scale Silo

General Description: Mill Scale Silo Conveyor Transfer Point Installed: 1952-1954 Control Device: Enclosure Manufacturer/Model #: EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-9



## Permit Condition EU0110-001 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation: The owner or operator shall not cause to be discharged any gases from the mill scale silo conveyor transfer point which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent. (§63.1348) Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the mill scale silo conveyor transfer point opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when the mill scale silo conveyor transfer point is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The maximum six-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to determine whether the mill scale silo conveyor transfer point is in initial compliance with the standard. The duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be 3-hours (30 6-minute averages), except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to 1-hour if the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)): (1) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i)); (2) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent for the first 1-hour period. (§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five years. (§63.1349(c)) Monitoring:

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly 1-minute visible emissions test of each affected source in accordance with Method 22 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The test must be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests for any affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semi-annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 33 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must conduct a 6-minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The Method 9 test must begin within one hour of any observation of visible emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv)) Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by §63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b)) (1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1)) (2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and (§63.1355(b)(2)) (3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3)) Reporting: As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2)) The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 34 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0110-002

10 CSR 10-2.060 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants 

### 10 CSR 10-6.220 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants Emission Limitation: No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity. Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained: 1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer. Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting: 1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units, 2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and 3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 35 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0110-003

10 CSR 10-2.030 Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation: The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of 30.5 lbs/hr from the mill scale silo conveyor transfer point Monitoring: None Record Keeping: None Reporting: The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.



## EU0120 Alternate Raw Material Transfer Station

General Description: Alternate Raw Material Transfer Station Installed: 1952-1954 Control Device: Baghouse Manufacturer/Model #: EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-10



## Permit Condition EU0120-001 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation:The owner or operator shall not cause to be discharged any gases from the catalyst/nonhazardous waste transfer station which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent. (§63.1348) Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the catalyst/non-hazardous waste transfer station opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when the catalyst/non-hazardous waste transfer station is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The maximum six-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to determine whether the catalyst/non-hazardous waste transfer station is in initial compliance with the standard. The duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be 3-hours (30 6-minute averages), except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to 1-hour if the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)):

(1) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i)); (2) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent for the first 1-hour period. (§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five years. (§63.1349(c))

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 36 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

Monitoring:

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly 1-minute visible emissions test of each affected source in accordance with Method 22 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The test must be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests for any affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semi-annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must conduct a 6-minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The Method 9 test must begin within one hour of any observation of visible emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv)) Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by §63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b)) (1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1)) (2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and (§63.1355(b)(2)) (3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3)) Reporting: As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2)) The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 37 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0120-002

10 CSR 10-2.060 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants 

### 10 CSR 10-6.220 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation: No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity. Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained: 1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer. Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting: 1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units, 2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and 3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 38 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0120-003

10 CSR 10-2.030 Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation: The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of 1.25 lbs/hr and 12.63 lbs/hr from catalyst and non hazardous waste transfer point, respectively. Monitoring: None Record Keeping: None Reporting: The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 39 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## EU0130 Mill Feed Silo Building

General Description: Mill Feed Silo Building (Mill Scale Conveyor Unloading to Silo) Installed: 1952-1954 Control Device: Enclosure Manufacturer/Model #: EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-11



## Permit Condition EU0130-001 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation: The owner or operator shall not cause to be discharged any gases from the mill scale conveyor transfer point which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent. (§63.1348) Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the mill scale conveyor transfer point opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when the mill scale conveyor transfer point is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The maximum six-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to determine whether the mill scale silo conveyor transfer point is in initial compliance with the standard. The duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be 3-hours (30 6-minute averages), except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to 1-hour if the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)): (1) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i)); (2) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent for the first 1-hour period. (§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five years. (§63.1349(c)) Monitoring:

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly 1-minute visible emissions test of each affected source in accordance with Method 22 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The test must be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests for any affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semi-annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 40 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must conduct a 6-minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The Method 9 test must begin within one hour of any observation of visible emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv)) Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by §63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b)) (1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1)) (2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and (§63.1355(b)(2)) (3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3)) Reporting: As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2)) The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 41 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0130-002

10 CSR 10-2.060 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants 

### 10 CSR 10-6.220 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation: No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity. Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained: 1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer. Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting: 1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units, 2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and 3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 42 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0130-003

10 CSR 10-2.030 Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation: The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of 54.72 lbs/hr from the mill scale conveyor transfer point Monitoring: None Record Keeping: None Reporting: The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 43 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## EU0140 through EU0160 and EU0190 EU0140 - Raw Mill #1 Conveyor (to feed belt) EU0150 – Raw Mill #1 Feed Belt EU0160 – Raw Mill #1 Weigh Hopper EU0190 – Raw Mill #1 - Unloading (Airslide to Raw Mix Pumps)

General Description: Raw Material Milling Process Associated Equipment Installed: 1954 Control Device: Baghouse Manufacturer/Model #: Nordberg EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-12


## Permit Condition EU0140-001 through EU0160-001 and EU0190-001 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation: The owner or operator shall not cause to be discharged any gases from these affected sources which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent. (§63.1348) Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with these affected sources opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when these affected sources are operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The maximum six-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to determine whether these affected sources are in initial compliance with the standard. The duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be 3-hours (30 6- minute averages), except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to 1-hour if the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)): (1) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i)); (2) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent for the first 1-hour period. (§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five years. (§63.1349(c)) Monitoring:

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly 1-minute visible emissions test of each affected source in accordance with Method 22 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The test must be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests for any affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semi-annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual test, the

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 44 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must conduct a 6-minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The Method 9 test must begin within one hour of any observation of visible emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv)) Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by §63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b)) (1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1)) (2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and (§63.1355(b)(2)) (3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3)) Reporting: As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2)) The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 45 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0140-002 through EU0160-002 and EU0190-002
10 CSR 10-2.060 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants 

### 10 CSR 10-6.220 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation: No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity. Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained: 1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer. Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting: 1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units, 2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and 3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 46 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0140-003 through EU0160-003 and EU0190-003
10 CSR 10-2.030 Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation: The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of 47.77 lbs/hr from any of the raw material milling process associated equipment. Monitoring: The permittee shall comply with the monitoring requirements listed below:

• Baghouse operation and maintenance: 1. Check and document the baghouse pressure drop weekly. If the pressure drop falls out of the normal operating range, specified by the manufacturer, corrective action shall be taken within eight (8) hours to return the pressure drop to normal. 2. Check the cleaning sequence of the baghouse monthly. 3. Thoroughly inspect bags for leaks and wear quarterly. 4. Inspect every six (6) months all components that are not subject to wear or plugging, including structural components, housing, ducts and hoods. If leaks or abnormal conditions are detected the appropriate measures for remediation shall be implemented within eight (8) hours. Bag replacement should be documented. Maintain a written record of the inspection and any action resulting from the inspection. All instruments and control equipment shall be calibrated, maintained, and operated according to the manufacturer’s specifications. Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain a written or electronic record of all inspections and any action resulting from the inspection.

• The permittee shall retain the calculations showing compliance with 10 CSR 10-2.030.

• These records shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of Natural Resources’ personnel upon request. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 47 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## EU0170 through EU0180 EU0170 - Raw Mill #1 Grinder EU0180 - Raw Mill #1 Air Separator

General Description: Raw Mill # 1 Grinder and Air Separator Installed: 1954 Control Device: Baghouse Manufacturer/Model #: Nordberg EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-12


## Permit Condition EU0170-001 through EU0180-001 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation: The owner or operator of each raw mill shall not cause to be discharged from the mill sweep or air separator air pollution control devices any gases which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent. (§63.1347) Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the raw mill opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when the raw mill is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The maximum six-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to determine whether the raw mill is in initial compliance with the standard. The duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be 3-hours (30 6-minute averages), except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to 1-hour if the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)): (1) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i)); (2) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent for the first 1-hour period. (§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five years. (§63.1349(c)) Monitoring:

• The owner or operator of a raw mill shall monitor opacity by conducting daily visual emissions observations of the mill sweep and air separator PMCDs of these affected sources, in accordance with the procedures of Method 22 of appendix A of part 60 of this chapter. The Method 22 test shall be conducted while the affected source is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur within the day. The duration of the Method 22 test shall be six minutes. If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 visible emissions test, the owner or operator must (§63.1350(e)): (1) Initiate, within one-hour, the corrective actions specified in the site specific operating and maintenance plan developed in accordance with §63.1350(a)(1) and (a)(2). (§63.1350(e)(1))

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 48 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

(2) Within 24 hours of the end of the Method 22 test in which visible emissions were observed, conduct a visual opacity test of each stack from which visible emissions were observed in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A of part 60 of this chapter. The duration of the Method 9 test shall be thirty minutes. (§63.1350(e)(2)) Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by §63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b)) (1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1)) (2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and (§63.1355(b)(2)) (3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3)) Reporting: As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2)) The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 49 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0170-002 through EU0180-002
10 CSR 10-2.060 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants 

### 10 CSR 10-6.220 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation: No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity. Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained: 1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer. Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting: 1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units, 2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and 3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 50 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0170-003 through EU0180-003
10 CSR 10-2.030 Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation: The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of 47.77 lbs/hr either from the raw mill or the aspirator. Monitoring: The permittee shall comply with the monitoring requirements listed below:

• Baghouse operation and maintenance: 1. Check and document the baghouse pressure drop weekly. If the pressure drop falls out of the normal operating range, specified by the manufacturer, corrective action shall be taken within eight (8) hours to return the pressure drop to normal. 2. Check the cleaning sequence of the baghouse monthly. 3. Thoroughly inspect bags for leaks and wear quarterly. 4. Inspect every six (6) months all components that are not subject to wear or plugging, including structural components, housing, ducts and hoods. If leaks or abnormal conditions are detected the appropriate measures for remediation shall be implemented within eight (8) hours. Bag replacement should be documented. Maintain a written record of the inspection and any action resulting from the inspection. All instruments and control equipment shall be calibrated, maintained, and operated according to the manufacturer’s specifications. Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain a written or electronic record of all inspections and any action resulting from the inspection.

• The permittee shall retain the calculations showing compliance with 10 CSR 10-2.030.

• These records shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of Natural Resources’ personnel upon request. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 51 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## EU0200 Raw Mill #1 - 10 MMBtu/hr Dryer

General Description: Natural Gas Fired 10 MMBtu/hr Dryer Installed: 1970 Control Device: Baghouse Manufacturer/Model #: Nordberg EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-12



## Permit Condition EU0200-001 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation: The owner or operator shall not cause to be discharged any gases from the affected source which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent. (§63.1348) Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with these affected source opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when these affected sources are operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The maximum six-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to determine whether these affected sources are in initial compliance with the standard. The duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be 3-hours (30 6- minute averages), except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to 1-hour if the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)): (1) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i)); (2) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent for the first 1-hour period. (§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five years. (§63.1349(c)) Monitoring:

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly 1-minute visible emissions test of each affected source in accordance with Method 22 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The test must be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests for any affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semi-annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 52 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must conduct a 6-minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The Method 9 test must begin within one hour of any observation of visible emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv)) Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by §63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b)) (1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1)) (2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and (§63.1355(b)(2)) (3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3)) Reporting: As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2)) The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 53 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0200-002

10 CSR 10-2.060 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants 

### 10 CSR 10-6.220 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants
Emission Limitation: No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity. Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained: 1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer. Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting: 1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units, 2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and 3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 54 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0200-003

10 CSR 10-2.030 Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation: The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of 47.77 lbs/hr from the raw mill dryer. Monitoring: The permittee shall comply with the monitoring requirements listed below:

• Baghouse operation and maintenance: 1. Check and document the baghouse pressure drop weekly. If the pressure drop falls out of the normal operating range, specified by the manufacturer, corrective action shall be taken within eight (8) hours to return the pressure drop to normal. 2. Check the cleaning sequence of the baghouse monthly. 3. Thoroughly inspect bags for leaks and wear quarterly. 4. Inspect every six (6) months all components that are not subject to wear or plugging, including structural components, housing, ducts and hoods. If leaks or abnormal conditions are detected the appropriate measures for remediation shall be implemented within eight (8) hours. Bag replacement should be documented. Maintain a written record of the inspection and any action resulting from the inspection. All instruments and control equipment shall be calibrated, maintained, and operated according to the manufacturer’s specifications. Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain a written or electronic record of all inspections and any action resulting from the inspection.

• The permittee shall retain the calculations showing compliance with 10 CSR 10-2.030.

• These records shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of Natural Resources’ personnel upon request. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 55 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0200-004

10 CSR 10-6.260 Restriction of Emission of Sulfur Compounds

Emission Limitation:

• Emissions from any existing source operation shall not contain more than two thousand parts per million by volume (2000 ppmv).

• Emissions from any existing source operation shall not contain more than seventy milligrams (70 mg) per cubic meter of sulfuric acid or sulfur trioxide or any combination of those gases averaged on any consecutive three hour time period.

• No person shall cause or permit the emission of sulfur compounds from any source which causes or contributes to concentrations exceeding those specified in 10 CSR 10-6.010 Ambient Air Quality Standards.

• The emission unit shall be limited to burning pipeline grade natural gas. Monitoring: None Record Keeping: None Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than 10 days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-6.260 demonstrated by the appropriate record keeping forms. 10 CSR 10-6.260(4) is a state-only requirement


## EU0210 through EU0230 and EU0260 EU0210 - Raw Mill #2 Conveyor (to feed belt) EU0220 – Raw Mill #2 Feed Belt EU0230 – Raw Mill #2 Weigh Hopper EU0260 – Raw Mill #2 Unloading (Airslide to Raw Mix Pumps 

## )

General Description: Raw Material Milling Process Associated Equipment Installed: 1952 Control Device: Baghouse Manufacturer/Model #: Nordberg EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-13


## Permit Condition EU0210-001 through EU0230-001 and EU0260-001 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation: The owner or operator shall not cause to be discharged any gases from these affected sources which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent. (§63.1348)

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 56 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with these affected sources opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when these affected sources are operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The maximum six-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to determine whether these affected sources are in initial compliance with the standard. The duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be 3-hours (30 6- minute averages), except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to 1-hour if the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)): (1) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i)); (2) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent for the first 1-hour period. (§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five years. (§63.1349(c)) Monitoring:

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly 1-minute visible emissions test of each affected source in accordance with Method 22 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The test must be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests for any affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semi-annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must conduct a 6-minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The Method 9 test must begin within one hour of any observation of visible emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv)) Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 57 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by §63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b)) (1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1)) (2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and (§63.1355(b)(2)) (3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3)) Reporting: As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2)) The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]


## Permit Condition EU0210-002 through EU0230-002 and EU0260-002
10 CSR 10-2.060 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants 

### 10 CSR 10-6.220 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants
Emission Limitation: No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity. Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained: 1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 58 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting: 1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units, 2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and 3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.


## Permit Condition EU0210-003 through EU0230-003 and EU0260-003
10 CSR 10-2.030 Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation: The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of 47.77 lbs/hr from any of the raw material milling process associated equipment. Monitoring: The permittee shall comply with the monitoring requirements listed below:

• Baghouse operation and maintenance: 1. Check and document the baghouse pressure drop weekly. If the pressure drop falls out of the normal operating range, specified by the manufacturer, corrective action shall be taken within eight (8) hours to return the pressure drop to normal. 2. Check the cleaning sequence of the baghouse monthly. 3. Thoroughly inspect bags for leaks and wear quarterly. 4. Inspect every six (6) months all components that are not subject to wear or plugging, including structural components, housing, ducts and hoods. If leaks or abnormal conditions are detected the appropriate measures for remediation shall be implemented within eight (8) hours. Bag replacement should be documented. Maintain a written record of the inspection and any action resulting from the inspection. All instruments and control equipment shall be calibrated, maintained, and operated according to the manufacturer’s specifications. Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain a written or electronic record of all inspections and any action resulting from the inspection.

• The permittee shall retain the calculations showing compliance with 10 CSR 10-2.030.

• These records shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of Natural Resources’ personnel upon request. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 59 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## EU0240 through EU0250 EU0240 - Raw Mill #2 Grinder EU0250 - Raw Mill #2 Air Separator

General Description: Raw Mill # 2 Grinder and Air Separator Installed: 1954 Control Device: Baghouse Manufacturer/Model #: Nordberg EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-13


## Permit Condition EU0240-001 through EU0250-001 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation: The owner or operator of each raw mill shall not cause to be discharged from the mill sweep or air separator air pollution control devices any gases which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent. (§63.1347) Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the raw mill opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when the raw mill is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The maximum six-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to determine whether the raw mill is in initial compliance with the standard. The duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be 3-hours (30 6-minute averages), except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to 1-hour if the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)): (1) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i)); (2) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent for the first 1-hour period. (§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five years. (§63.1349(c)) Monitoring:

• The owner or operator of a raw mill shall monitor opacity by conducting daily visual emissions observations of the mill sweep and air separator PMCDs of these affected sources, in accordance with the procedures of Method 22 of appendix A of part 60 of this chapter. The Method 22 test shall be conducted while the affected source is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur within the day. The duration of the Method 22 test shall be six minutes. If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 visible emissions test, the owner or operator must (§63.1350(e)): (1) Initiate, within one-hour, the corrective actions specified in the site specific operating and maintenance plan developed in accordance with §63.1350(a)(1) and (a)(2). (§63.1350(e)(1))

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 60 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

(2) Within 24 hours of the end of the Method 22 test in which visible emissions were observed, conduct a visual opacity test of each stack from which visible emissions were observed in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A of part 60 of this chapter. The duration of the Method 9 test shall be thirty minutes. (§63.1350(e)(2)) Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by §63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b)) (1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1)) (2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and (§63.1355(b)(2)) (3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3)) Reporting: As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2)) The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 61 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0240-002 through EU0250-002
10 CSR 10-2.060 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants 

### 10 CSR 10-6.220 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation: No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity. Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained: 1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer. Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting: 1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units, 2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and 3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 62 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0240-003 through EU0250-003
10 CSR 10-2.030 Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation: The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of 47.77 lbs/hr either from the raw mill or the aspirator. Monitoring: The permittee shall comply with the monitoring requirements listed below:

• Baghouse operation and maintenance: 1. Check and document the baghouse pressure drop weekly. If the pressure drop falls out of the normal operating range, specified by the manufacturer, corrective action shall be taken within eight (8) hours to return the pressure drop to normal. 2. Check the cleaning sequence of the baghouse monthly. 3. Thoroughly inspect bags for leaks and wear quarterly. 4. Inspect every six (6) months all components that are not subject to wear or plugging, including structural components, housing, ducts and hoods. If leaks or abnormal conditions are detected the appropriate measures for remediation shall be implemented within eight (8) hours. Bag replacement should be documented. Maintain a written record of the inspection and any action resulting from the inspection. All instruments and control equipment shall be calibrated, maintained, and operated according to the manufacturer’s specifications. Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain a written or electronic record of all inspections and any action resulting from the inspection.

• The permittee shall retain the calculations showing compliance with 10 CSR 10-2.030.

• These records shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of Natural Resources’ personnel upon request. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 63 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## EU0270 Raw Mill #2 - 10 MMBtu/hr Dryer

General Description: Natural Gas Fired 10 MMBtu/hr Dryer Installed: 1970 Control Device: Baghouse Manufacturer/Model #: Nordberg EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-13



## Permit Condition EU0270-001 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation: The owner or operator shall not cause to be discharged any gases from the affected source which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent. (§63.1348) Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with these affected source opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when these affected sources are operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The maximum six-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to determine whether these affected sources are in initial compliance with the standard. The duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be 3-hours (30 6- minute averages), except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to 1-hour if the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)): (1) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i)); (2) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent for the first 1-hour period. (§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five years. (§63.1349(c)) Monitoring:

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly 1-minute visible emissions test of each affected source in accordance with Method 22 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The test must be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests for any affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semi-annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 64 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must conduct a 6-minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The Method 9 test must begin within one hour of any observation of visible emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv)) Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by §63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b)) (1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1)) (2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and (§63.1355(b)(2)) (3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3)) Reporting: As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2)) The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 65 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0270-002

10 CSR 10-2.060 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants 

### 10 CSR 10-6.220 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation: No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity. Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained: 1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer. Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting: 1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units, 2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and 3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 66 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0270-003

10 CSR 10-2.030 Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation: The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of 47.77 lbs/hr from the raw material dryer. Monitoring: The permittee shall comply with the monitoring requirements listed below:

• Baghouse operation and maintenance: 1. Check and document the baghouse pressure drop weekly. If the pressure drop falls out of the normal operating range, specified by the manufacturer, corrective action shall be taken within eight (8) hours to return the pressure drop to normal. 2. Check the cleaning sequence of the baghouse monthly. 3. Thoroughly inspect bags for leaks and wear quarterly. 4. Inspect every six (6) months all components that are not subject to wear or plugging, including structural components, housing, ducts and hoods. If leaks or abnormal conditions are detected the appropriate measures for remediation shall be implemented within eight (8) hours. Bag replacement should be documented. Maintain a written record of the inspection and any action resulting from the inspection. All instruments and control equipment shall be calibrated, maintained, and operated according to the manufacturer’s specifications. Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain a written or electronic record of all inspections and any action resulting from the inspection.

• The permittee shall retain the calculations showing compliance with 10 CSR 10-2.030.

• These records shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of Natural Resources’ personnel upon request. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 67 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0270-004

10 CSR 10-6.260 Restriction of Emission of Sulfur Compounds

Emission Limitation:

• Emissions from any existing source operation shall not contain more than two thousand parts per million by volume (2000 ppmv).

• Emissions from any existing source operation shall not contain more than seventy milligrams (70 mg) per cubic meter of sulfuric acid or sulfur trioxide or any combination of those gases averaged on any consecutive three hour time period.

• No person shall cause or permit the emission of sulfur compounds from any source which causes or contributes to concentrations exceeding those specified in 10 CSR 10-6.010 Ambient Air Quality Standards.

• The emission unit shall be limited to burning pipeline grade natural gas. Monitoring: None Record Keeping: The permittee shall maintain an accurate record of the sulfur content of fuel as fired. These records shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of Natural Resources' personnel upon request. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than 10 days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-6.260 demonstrated by the appropriate record keeping forms. 10 CSR 10-6.260(4) is a state-only requirement



## EU0280 through EU0300 EU0280 – Blend Silos EU0290 – Blend Conveyor EU0300 – Kiln Feed Leveling Box

General Description: Blend Silos – Raw mix unloading to blend silos (pneumatic conveying) Installed: 1952 Control Device: Baghouse Blend Conveyor & Kiln Feed Leveling Box (kiln feed handling systems) - Raw materials are transfered from the blend silos via a blend conveyor to a kiln feed leveling box and are then fed to the rotary cement kilns. These systems consist of mechanical screw conveyors and elevators that are vented to two fabric filter baghouses. Installed: 1952 Manufacturer/Model #: EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-14, EP-15 & EP-16

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 68 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0280-001 through EU0300-001 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation: The owner or operator of each raw material storage bin; conveying system transfer point; and bulk loading or unloading system shall not cause to be discharged any gases from raw material storage bin; conveying system transfer point; bagging system; and bulk loading or unloading system which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent. (§63.1348) Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the raw material storage bin; conveying system transfer point; and bulk loading or unloading system opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when the raw material storage bin; conveying system transfer point; and bulk loading or unloading system is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The maximum six-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to determine whether the raw material storage bin; conveying system transfer point; and bulk loading or unloading system is in initial compliance with the standard. The duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be 3-hours (30 6-minute averages), except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to 1-hour if the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)): (1) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i)); (2) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent for the first 1-hour period. (§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five years. (§63.1349(c)) Monitoring:

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly 1-minute visible emissions test of each affected source in accordance with Method 22 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The test must be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests for any affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semi-annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 69 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must conduct a 6-minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The Method 9 test must begin within one hour of any observation of visible emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv)) Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by §63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b)) (1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1)) (2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and (§63.1355(b)(2)) (3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3)) Reporting: As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2)) The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 70 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0280-002 through EU0300-002
10 CSR 10-2.060 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants 

### 10 CSR 10-6.220 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation: No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity. Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained: 1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer. Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting: 1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units, 2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and 3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 71 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0280-003 through EU0300-003
10 CSR 10-2.030 Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation: The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of :

• 54.72 lbs/hr from EU0280;

• 52.84 lbs/hr from EU0290; and

• 52.84 lbs/hr from EU0300 Monitoring: None Record Keeping: None Reporting: The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.



## EU0310 through EU0340 EU0310 – Coal/Coke Unloading to Transfer Conveyor EU0320 – Fuel Grinding Mills EU0330 – Transfer Conveyor Unloading to Fuel Hopper EU0340 – Fuel Hopper Unloading to Fuel Silo Conveyor

General Description: Kiln Burner Building – Solid fuel is reclaimed from the stockpiles and loaded to a transfer conveyor. The conveyor transports the fuel to the fuel hopper. The fuel hopper transfers the fuel to another conveyor that transports the fuel to the coal or coke silos. All transfer/transport operations are contained within the kiln burner building. Installed: 1952 - 1954 Manufacturer/Model #: EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-18


## Permit Condition EU0310-001 through EU0340-001 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation: The owner or operator of each raw material storage bin; conveying system transfer point; and bulk loading or unloading system shall not cause to be discharged any gases from raw material storage bin; conveying system transfer point; bagging system; and bulk loading or unloading system which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent. (§63.1348)

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 72 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the raw material storage bin; conveying system transfer point; and bulk loading or unloading system opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when the raw material storage bin; conveying system transfer point; and bulk loading or unloading system is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The maximum six-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to determine whether the raw material storage bin; conveying system transfer point; and bulk loading or unloading system is in initial compliance with the standard. The duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be 3-hours (30 6-minute averages), except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to 1-hour if the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)): (1) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i)); (2) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent for the first 1-hour period. (§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five years. (§63.1349(c)) Monitoring:

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly 1-minute visible emissions test of each affected source in accordance with Method 22 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The test must be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests for any affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semi-annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must conduct a 6-minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The Method 9 test must begin within one hour of any observation of visible emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv)) Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 73 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by §63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b)) (1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1)) (2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and (§63.1355(b)(2)) (3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3)) Reporting: As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2)) The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 74 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0310-002 through EU0340-002
10 CSR 10-2.060 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants 

### 10 CSR 10-6.220 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation: No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity. Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained: 1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer. Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting: 1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units, 2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and 3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 75 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## EU0350 through EU0360

EU0350 – Coal Silos EU0360 – Coke/NH Fuel Substitute Silo (Unloading from Conveyor to Silo)

General Description: Solid Fuel Handling – Solid Fuel Storage and Conveying. Installed: 1952 - 1954 Manufacturer/Model #: EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-19 & EP-20


## Permit Condition EU0350-001 through EU0360-001 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation: The owner or operator of each raw material storage bin shall not cause to be discharged any gases from raw material storage bin which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent. (§63.1348) Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the raw material storage bin opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when the raw material storage bin is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The maximum six-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to determine whether the raw material storage bin is in initial compliance with the standard. The duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be 3- hours (30 6-minute averages), except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to 1-hour if the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)): (1) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i)); (2) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent for the first 1-hour period. (§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five years. (§63.1349(c)) Monitoring:

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly 1-minute visible emissions test of each affected source in accordance with Method 22 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The test must be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests for any affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semi-annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 76 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must conduct a 6-minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The Method 9 test must begin within one hour of any observation of visible emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv)) Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by §63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b)) (1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1)) (2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and (§63.1355(b)(2)) (3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3)) Reporting: As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2)) The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 77 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0350-002 through EU0360-002
10 CSR 10-2.060 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants 

### 10 CSR 10-6.220 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation: No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity. Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained: 1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer. Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting: 1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units, 2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and 3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 78 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0350-003 through EU00360-003
10 CSR 10-2.030 Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation:

• The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of 42.53 lbs/hr from any of the emission units (EU0350 or EU0360). Monitoring: None Record Keeping: None Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.


## EU0370 through EU0380 EU0370 – Rotary Cement Kiln #1 EU0380 – Rotary Cement Kiln #2

General Description: Two Rotary Cement Kilns - The two kilns are capable of processing 140 tons of raw material and 13.7 tons of solid fuel per hour and producing approximately 75 tons of cement clinker per hour. Installed: 1952 (Kiln #1); 1954 (Kiln #2) Control Device: High Efficiency ESP Manufacturer/Model #: F.L. Smith (Kiln #1); Allis Chalmers (Kiln #2) EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-21


## Permit Condition EU0370-001 through EU0380-001 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Particulate Matter (PM)

Emission Limitation: No owner or operator of a kiln shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from these affected sources, any gases which contain particulate matter in excess of 0.15 kg per MG (0.30 lb per ton) of feed (dry basis) to the kiln. (§63.1343(b)(1)) Performance Testing:

• The permittee shall demonstrate initial compliance with the kiln by conducting a performance test as specified in §63.1349(b)(1)(i) through (b)(1)(iv). (§63.1349)(b)

• EPA Method 5 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter shall be used to determine PM emissions. Each performance test shall consist of three separate runs under the conditions that exist when the kiln is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. Each run shall be conducted for at least one hour, and the minimum sample volume shall be 0.85 dscm (30 dscf). The average of the three runs shall be used to determine compliance. A determination of the particulate matter collected in the impingers

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 79 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

(“back half”) of the Method 5 particulate sampling train is not required to demonstrate initial compliance with the PM standards of this subpart. However, this shall not preclude the permitting authority from requiring a determination of the “back half” for other purposes. (§63.1349(b)(1)(i))

• Suitable methods shall be used to determine the kiln feed rate, except for fuels, for each run. (§63.1349(b)(1)(ii))

• The emission rate, E of PM shall be computed for each run using the following equation (§63.1349(b)(1)(iii)): 

## ( ) P Q C E sd s 

### = Where: E = emission rate of PM, kg/Mg of kiln feed C s = concentration of PM, kg/dscm Q sd = volumetric flow rate of effluent gas, dscm/hr P = total kiln feed (dry basis), Mg/hr

• Except as provided in §63.1349(e), performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(1) shall be repeated every five years. (§63.1349(c))

• The owner or operator is required to repeat the performance tests for kilns or in-line kiln/raw mills as specified in §63.1349(b)(1) and (b)(3) within 90 days of initiating any significant change in the feed or fuel form that used in the previous performance test. (§63.1349(e)) Monitoring:

• The owner or operator shall install, calibrate, maintain and operate a particulate matter continuous emission monitoring system (PM CEMS) to measure the particulate matter discharged to the atmosphere. The compliance deadline for installing the PM CEMS and all requirements relating to performance of the PM CEMS and implementation of the PM CEMS requirement is deferred pending further rulemaking. (§63.1350(k))

• Pending further rulemaking, the permittee shall comply with the monitoring requirements listed below: Electrostatic Precipitators operation and maintenance: (1) An audible or visual alarm that indicates precipitator trouble shall be monitored. (2) The permittee shall monitor the primary and secondary voltage and current, and spark rate once each week after the date on which the performance test is completed. The parameters to be used as indicators of compliance shall be set at values (ranges) measured at the time when the performance test demonstrates compliance with the emission limit. If abnormal conditions are detected, the appropriate measures for remediation shall be implemented within eight (8) hours. All instruments and control equipment shall be calibrated, maintained, and operated according to the manufacture specifications. Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by §63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b))

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 80 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

(1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1)) (2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and (§63.1355(b)(2)) (3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

• The owner or operator of an affected source equipped with a continuous monitoring system shall maintain all records required by §63.10(c). (§63.1355(c))

• The permittee shall maintain a written or electronic record of all inspections and any action resulting from the inspection. These records shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of Natural Resources’ personnel upon request Reporting:

• The permittee shall comply with the reporting requirements for the performance test stated in Permit Condition: PW007.

• As required by §63.10(d)(2), the owner or operator shall report the results of performance tests as part of the notification of compliance status. (§63.1354(b)(1))

• As required by §63.10(e)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source equipped with a continuous emission monitor shall submit an excess emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report for any event when the continuous monitoring system data indicates the source is not in compliance with the applicable emission limitation or operating parameter limit. (§63.1354(b)(8))

• If the total continuous monitoring system downtime for any CEM or any continuous monitoring system (CMS) for the reporting period is ten percent or greater of the total operating time for the reporting period, the owner or operator shall submit an excess emissions and continuous monitoring performance report along with the summary report (mentioned in PW003). (§63.1354(b)(10)) The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 81 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0370-002 through EU0380-002
10 CSR 10-2.030 Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation: The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of 42.03 lbs/hr from each kiln. Monitoring: The permittee shall comply with the monitoring requirements listed below:

• Electrostatic Precipitators operation and maintenance:

(1) An audible or visual alarm that indicates precipitator trouble shall be monitored. (2) The permittee shall monitor the primary and secondary voltage and current, and spark rate once each week after the date on which the performance test is completed. The parameters to be used as indicators of compliance shall be set at values (ranges) measured at the time when the performance test demonstrates compliance with the emission limit. If abnormal conditions are detected, the appropriate measures for remediation shall be implemented within eight (8) hours. All instruments and control equipment shall be calibrated, maintained, and operated according to the manufacture specifications. Record Keeping: Records shall be maintained on site for five (5) years and be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of Natural Resources’ personnel upon request. The records shall indicate the following:

• Record of the stack testing or test information required by this permit.

• Any monitoring or control equipment malfunctions.

• All corrective action records. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 82 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0370-003 through EU0380-003 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation: No owner or operator of a kiln shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from these affected sources, any gases which exhibit opacity greater than 20 percent. (§63.1343(b)(2)) Performance Testing:

• The opacity exhibited during the period of the Method 5 performance test for particulate matter required by §63.1349(b)(1)(i) shall be determined as required in §63.1349(b)(1)(v) through (vi). (§63.1349(b)(1))

• Except as provided in §63.1349(b)(1)(vi), the opacity exhibited ruing the period of the Method 5 performance tests required by §63.1349(b)(1)(i) shall be determined through the use of a continuous opacity monitor (COM). The maximum six-minute average opacity during the three Method 5 test runs shall be determined during each Method 5 test run, and used to demonstrate initial compliance with the applicable opacity limits of §63.1343(b)(2). (§63.1349(b)(1)(v))

• Each owner or operator of a kiln using an electrostatic precipitator exhausting through a monovent, or if the use of a COM in accordance with the installation specifications of Performance Specification 1 (PS-1) of appendix B to part 60 of this chapter is not feasible, a test shall be conducted in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter during each Method 5 performance test required by §63.1349(b)(1)(i). The maximum six-minute average opacity shall be determined during the three Method 5 test runs, and used to demonstrate initial compliance with the applicable opacity limits of §63.1343(b)(2). (§63.1349(b)(1)(vi)) Monitoring:

• The owner or operator of a kiln shall monitor opacity at each point where emissions are vented from these affected sources including alkali bypasses in accordance with §63.1350(c)(1) through (c)(3). (§63.1350(c))

• Except as provided in §63.1350(c)(2), the owner or operator shall install, calibrate, maintain, and continuously operate a continuous opacity monitor (COM) located at the outlet of the PM control device to continuously monitor the opacity. The COM shall be installed, maintained, calibrated, and operated as required by subpart A, general provisions of this part, and according to PS-1 of appendix B to part 60 of this chapter. (§63.1350(c)(1))

• The owner or operator of a kiln with an electrostatic precipitator exhausting through a monovent, or if the use of a COM in accordance with the installation specifications of PS-1 of appendix B to part 60 of this chapter is not feasible, the owner or operator must monitor opacity in accordance with §63.1350(c)(2)(i) through (ii). (§63.1350(c)(2)) (1) Perform daily visual opacity observations of each stack in accordance with the procedures of Method 9 of appendix A of part 60 of this chapter. The Method 9 test shall be conducted while the affected source is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur within the day. The duration of the Method 9 test shall be at least 30 minutes each day. (§63.1350(c)(2)(i)) (2) Use the Method 9 procedures to monitor and record the average opacity for each sixminute period during the test. (§63.1350(c)(2)(ii))

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 83 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

• To remain in compliance, the opacity must be maintained such that the 6-minute average opacity for any 6-minute block period does not exceed 20 percent. If the average opacity for any 6-minute block period exceeds 20 percent, this shall constitute a violation of the standard. (§63.1350(c)(3)) Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by §63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b)) (1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1)) (2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and (§63.1355(b)(2)) (3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

• The owner or operator of an affected source equipped with a continuous monitoring system shall maintain all records required by §63.10(c). (§63.1355(c)) Reporting:

• As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2))

• As required by §63.10(e)(2), the owner or operator of an affected source using a continuous opacity monitoring system to determine opacity compliance during any performance test required under §63.7 and described in §63.6(d)(6) shall report the results of the continuous opacity monitoring system performance evaluation conducted under §63.8(e). (§63.1354(b)(7))

• As required by §63.10(e)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source equipped with a continuous emission monitor shall submit an excess emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report for any event when the continuous monitoring system data indicates the source is not in compliance with the applicable emission limitation or operating parameter limit. (§63.1354(b)(8))

• If the total continuous monitoring system downtime for any CEM or any continuous monitoring system (CMS) for the reporting period is ten percent or greater of the total operating time for the reporting period, the owner or operator shall submit an excess emissions and continuous monitoring performance report along with the summary report (mentioned in PW003). (§63.1354(b)(10)) The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 84 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0370-004 through EU0380-004
10 CSR 10-2.060 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants 

### 10 CSR 10-6.220 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation: No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity. Monitoring:

• A continuous opacity monitoring system shall be used to determine the opacity of the stack gases generated by the boiler. Sampling frequency shall be in accordance with 40 CFR Part 60.13(e)(1). Results shall be recorded on a Data Acquisition System (DAHS).

• The permittee shall calibrate, maintain, and operate a continuous opacity monitoring system for measuring opacity. The installation shall conduct a daily calibration check on the monitoring system as outlined by 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix B – Performance Specification 1. Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall record the daily monitoring system calibration check done on the continuous opacity monitoring system.

• These records shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of Natural Resource’s personnel upon request.

• All records must be maintained for five (5) years.

• This installation shall maintain records (the data these records are to contain are defined in the regulations) to include: (1) The charts generated by the continuous opacity, monitor. (2) An opacity summary report. (3) An excess opacity emission summary. (4) An excess opacity emission summary list. (5) An opacity monitoring downtime summary list.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions. Reporting:

• The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than 10 days after any exceedance of the opacity limit established by 10 CSR 10-2.060 or 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could possible cause an opacity exceedance.

• The permittee shall report quarterly when the monitoring system showed exceedances of the opacity limitations set forth in this rule. If any exceedances were recorded, the quarterly report should give the day, the duration of how long the emission unit was out of the limitations set forth in this rule, and a data summary of the exceedance (the data summary shall consist of the magnitude in actual percent opacity of all six (6)-minute averages of opacity greater than the opacity emission limitation). Additionally, the report shall give a detailed explanation of why the plant was in exceedance (nature and cause) and corrective action taken by Lafarge to bring the emission unit back into the limitations set forth in this

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 85 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

rule. If no excess emissions occurred within the quarter and the continuous opacity monitoring system has not been inoperative, repaired, or adjusted, that information shall be included in the report. All quarterly reports shall be postmarked by the thirtieth (30) day following the end of each calendar quarter.

• The permittee shall submit in the quarterly compliance report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section a summary that all daily continuous opacity monitoring calibration checks were done within the semi-annual period. Additionally, if any of the daily calibration checks of the monitoring system was not done, Lafarge shall also report the day and a detailed explanation of why the calibration check was not done in the semi-annual report. If the continuous opacity monitoring system was inoperative, the report shall include the date, time, and the nature of system repairs or adjustments. The permittee shall also include in the semi-annual report if the annual certification was done within the time period on the continuous opacity monitoring system and include all revenant certification test results within the report. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.


## Permit Condition EU0370-005 through EU0380-005 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Dioxins and Furans (D/F)

Emission Limitation:

• No owner or operator of a kiln shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from these affected sources, any gases which contain D/F in excess of:

(1) 0.20 ng per dscm (8.7x10-11 gr per dscf) (TEQ) corrected to seven percent oxygen; or (2) 0.40 ng per dscm (1.7x10-10 gr per dscf) (TEQ) corrected to seven percent oxygen, when the average of the performance test run average temperatures at the inlet to the particulate matter control device is 204°C (400°F) or less. (§63.1343(b)(3))

• The owner or operator of a kiln subject to a D/F emission limitation under §63.1343 must operate the kiln such that the temperature of the gas at the inlet to the kiln particulate matter control device (PMCD) and alkali bypass PMCD, if applicable, does not exceed the applicable temperature limit specified in §63.1344(b). (§63.1344(a))

• The temperature limit for a kiln meeting the limits of §63.1344(a) is determined in accordance with §63.1349(b)(3)(iv). (§63.1344(b))

• The owner or operator of a kiln subject to a D/F emission limitation under §63.1343 that employs carbon injection as an emission control technique must operate the carbon injection system in accordance with §63.1344(c)(1) and §63.1344(c)(2). (§63.1344(c))

(1) The three-hour rolling average activated carbon injection rate shall be equal to or greater than the activated carbon injection rate determine in accordance with §63.1349(b)(3)(vi). (§63.1344(c)(1)) (2) The owner or operator shall either (§63.1344(c)(2)): (i) Maintain the minimum activated carbon injection carrier gas flow rate, as a threehour rolling average, based on the manufacturer’s specification. These specifications must be documented in the test plan developed in accordance with §63.7(c), or (§63.1344(c)(2)(i)) (ii) Maintain the minimum activated carbon injection carrier gas pressure drop, as a three-hour rolling average, based on the manufacturer’s specifications. These

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 86 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

specifications must be documented in the test plan developed in accordance with §63.7(c). (§63.1344(c)(2)(ii))

• Except as provided in §63.1344(e), the owner or operator of a kiln subject to a D/F emission limitation under §63.1343 that employs carbon injection as an emission control techniques must specify and use the brand and type of activated carbon used during the performance test until a subsequent performance test is conducted, unless the site-specific performance test plan contains documentation of key parameters that affect adsorption and the owner or operator establishes limits based on those parameters, and the limits on these parameters are maintained §63.1344(d).

• The owner or operator of a kiln subject to a D/F emission limitation under §63.1343 that employs carbon injection as an emission control techniques may substitute, at any time, a different brand or type of activated carbon provided that the replacement has equivalent or improved properties compared to the activated carbon specified in the site-specific performance test plan and used in the performance test. The owner or operator must maintain documentation that the substitute activated carbon will provide the same or better level of control as the original activated carbon §63.1344(e). Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the D/F emission limit by conducting a performance test using Method 23 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. (§63.1349(b)(3))

• Each performance test shall consist of three separate runs; each run shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when the affected source is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The duration of each run shall be at least three hours and the sample volume for each run shall be at least 2.5 dscm (90 dscf). The concentration shall be determined for each run and the arithmetic average of the concentrations measure for the three runs shall be calculated and used to determine compliance. (§63.1349(b)(3)(i))

• The temperature at the inlet to the kiln or in-line kiln/raw mill PMCD, and where applicable, the temperature at the inlet to the alkali bypass PMCD, must be continuously recorded during the period of the Method 23 test, and the continuous temperature record(s) must be included in the performance test report. (§63.1349(b)(3)(ii))

• One-minute average temperatures must be calculated for each minute of each run of the test. (§63.1349(b)(3)(iii))

• The run average temperature must be calculated for each run, and the average of the run average temperatures must be determined and included in the performance test report and will determine the applicable temperature limit in accordance with §63.1344(b). (§63.1349(b)(3)(iv))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(3) shall be repeated every 30 months. (§63.1349(d))

• The owner or operator is required to repeat the performance tests for kilns or in-line kiln/raw mills as specified in §63.1349(b)(1) and (b)(3) within 90 days of initiating any significant change in the feed or fuel form that was used in the previous performance test. (§63.1349(e)) Monitoring:

• The owner or operator of an affected source subject to a limitation on D/F emissions shall monitor D/F emissions in accordance with §63.1350(f)(1) through (f)(6). (§63.1350(f))

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 87 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

• The owner or operator shall install, calibrate, maintain and continuously operate a continuous monitor to record the temperature of the exhaust gases from the kiln at the inlet to, or upstream of, the kiln PM control devices. (§63.1350(f)(1)) (1) The recorder response range must include zero and 1.5 times either of the average temperatures established according to the requirements in §63.1349(b)(3)(iv). (§63.1350(f)(1)(i)) (2) The reference method must be a National Institute of Standards and Technology calibrated reference thermocouple-potentiometer system or alternate reference, subject to approval by the Administrator. (§63.1350(f)(1)(ii))

• The owner or operator shall monitor and continuously record the temperature of the exhaust gases from the kiln, at the inlet to the kiln PMCD. (§63.1350(f)(2))

• The three-hour rolling average temperature shall be calculated as the average of 180 successive one-minute average temperatures. (§63.1350(f)(3))

• Periods of time when one-minute averages are not available shall be ignored when calculating three-hour rolling averages. When one-minute averages become available, the first one-minute average is added to the previous 179 values to calculate the three-hour rolling average. (§63.1350(f)(4))

• The calibration of all thermocouples and other temperature sensors shall be verified at least once every three months. (§63.1350(f)(6))

• The owner or operator of any kiln subject to a D/F emission limit shall conduct an inspection of the components of the combustion system of each kiln at least once per year. (§63.1350(i)) Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by §63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b)) (1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1)) (2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and (§63.1355(b)(2)) (3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

• The owner or operator of an affected source equipped with a continuous monitoring system shall maintain all records required by §63.10(c). (§63.1355(c)) Reporting:

• The permittee shall comply with the reporting requirements for the performance test stated in Permit Condition: PW007.

• As required by §63.10(d)(2), the owner or operator shall report the results of performance tests as part of the notification of compliance status. (§63.1354(b)(1))

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 88 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

• As required by §63.10(e)(2), the owner or operator shall submit a written report of the results of the performance evaluation for the continuous monitoring system required by §63.8(e). The owner or operator shall submit the report simultaneously with the results of the performance test. (§63.1354(b)(6))

• If the total continuous monitoring system downtime for any CEM or any continuous monitoring system (CMS) for the reporting period is ten percent or greater of the total operating time for the reporting period, the owner or operator shall submit an excess emissions and continuous monitoring performance report along with the summary report (mentioned in PW003). (§63.1354(b)(10)) The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]


## Permit Condition EU0370-006 through EU0380-006 10 CSR 10-6.060 Construction Permits Required 

### Construction Permit No. 0891-005A

Emission Limitation:

• Lafarge Corporation shall ensure that the sulfur content of the non-hazardous waste used for raw material substitution, as fired, is less than one-half percent (0.5%) by weight, [Special Condition 1]

• Lafarge Corporation shall ensure that the substitution rate of the non-hazardous waste will be less than five percent (5%) of kiln feed, or 5.36 tons per hour, whichever is less. [Special Condition 2]

• Lafarge Corporation shall ensure that the sulfur content of the non-hazardous organic waste used as a substitute for coke, as fired, is less than four percent (4%) by weight and that the sulfur content of the non-hazardous organic waste used as a substitute for coal, as fired, is less than one percent (1%) by weight. [Special Condition 3]

• Lafarge Corporation shall ensure that the substitution rate of the non-hazardous organic waste will be less than twenty-five percent (25%) of kiln feed, or 3.2 tons per hour, whichever is less. [Special Condition 4]

• Lafarge Corporation shall ensure that the increase in emissions due to the utilization of the proposed non-hazardous waste materials will not cause an increase in emissions over the calculated baseline, in excess of the de minims emissions limits set forth in Missouri State Rule 10 CSR 10-6.060, “Construction Permits Required,” (7)(A), Table 1 for any criteria pollutant. [Special Condition 5]

• Lafarge Corporation shall abide by the following specifications for non-hazardous wastes to be used for direct raw material substitution: [Special Condition 6] Cement Constituents Oxide of Silica + Alumina + Iron + Calcium > 80% Total Sulfur < 0.5% Total Halogens < 3.0% Organics Total Hydrocarbon as Diesel < 10% Volatile Organics < 1.0% TCLP Test Arsenic < 5 ppm Lead < 5 ppm Barium < 100 ppm Mercury < 0.2 ppm Cadmium < 1 ppm Selenium < 1 ppm Total Chromium < 5 ppm Silver < 5 ppm

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 89 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

Other Corrosivity, pH 2 – 12.5 Flash Point > 140 O F PCBs < 40 ppm Cyanides < 100 ppm

• Lafarge Corporation shall abide by the following specifications for non-hazardous wastes to be used for direct fuel substitution: [Special Condition 7] Fuel Characteristics Lower heating value, BTU per pound, as received : > 5000 Ash < 50% Cement Constituents in Ash Total Halogens < 3.0% TCLP Test Arsenic < 5 ppm Lead < 5 ppm Barium < 100 ppm Mercury < 0.2 ppm Cadmium < 1 ppm Selenium < 1 ppm Total Chromium < 5 ppm Silver < 5 ppm Other Corrosivity, pH 2 – 12.5 Flash Point > 140 O F PCBs < 40 ppm Cyanides < 100 ppm Monitoring: Records of non-hazardous wastes and specifications. Record Keeping: Lafarge Corporation shall keep monthly records on site, covering a period including at least the previous 24-months, which detail, for each month, the following items: [Special Condition 8}

• The amount, in tons, of non-hazardous wastes accepted for use for raw material substitution, together with the specifications for that waste; and

• The amount, in tons, of non-hazardous organic wastes accepted for use as a substitute for coal or coke, together with the specifications for that waste. Reporting: Lafarge Corporation shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of any of the terms imposed by Construction Permit No. 0891-005A.


## Permit Condition EU0370-007 through EU0380-007
10 CSR 10-6.260 Restriction of Emission of Sulfur Compounds

Emission Limitation:

• Emissions from any existing source operation shall not contain more than two thousand parts per million by volume (2000 ppmv).

• Emissions from any existing source operation shall not contain more than seventy milligrams (70 mg) per cubic meter of sulfuric acid or sulfur trioxide or any combination of those gases averaged on any consecutive three hour time period. Monitoring: None. Record Keeping: None

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 90 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than 10 days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-6.260 demonstrated by the appropriate record keeping forms. 10 CSR 10-6.260(4) is a state-only requirement


## EU0390 through EU0400 EU0390 – Clinker Cooler #1 EU0400 – Clinker Cooler #2

General Description: Clinker Coolers: Clinker exiting the rotary cement kilns pass through clinker coolers prior to storage or use in the finish mills. The #1 clinker cooler services the #1 kiln, and the #2 clinker cooler services the #2 kiln. Installed: 1952 (Clinker Cooler #1); 1954 (Clinker Cooler #2) Control Device: High Temperature Fabric Filter Manufacturer/Model #: Fuller EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-22 & 23; EP-24 & 25


## Permit Condition EU0390-001 through EU0400-001 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Particulate Matter

Emission Limitation: No owner or operator shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from the clinker cooler any gases which contain particulate matter in excess of 0.050 kg per Mg (0.10 lb per ton) of feed (dry basis) to the kiln. (§63.1345(a)(1)) Performance Testing:

• The permittee shall demonstrate initial compliance with the clinker cooler by conducting a performance test as specified in §63.1349(b)(1)(i) through (b)(1)(iii). (§63.1349(b)(1)

• EPA Method 5 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter shall be used to determine PM emissions. Each performance test shall consist of three separate runs under the conditions that exist when the clinker cooler is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. Each run shall be conducted for at least one hour, and the minimum sample volume shall be 0.85 dscm (30 dscf). The average of the three runs shall be used to determine compliance. A determination of the particulate matter collected in the impingers (“back half”) of the Method 5 particulate sampling train is not required to demonstrate initial compliance with the PM standards of this subpart. However, this shall not preclude the permitting authority from requiring a determination of the “back half” for other purposes. (§63.1349(b)(1)(i))

• Suitable methods shall be used to determine the kiln feed rate, except for fuels, for each run. (§63.1349(b)(1)(ii))

• The emission rate, E of PM shall be computed for each run using the following equation (§63.1349(b)(1)(iii)): 

## ( ) P Q C E sd s 

### = Where: E = emission rate of PM, kg/Mg of kiln feed

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 91 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

C s = concentration of PM, kg/dscm Q sd = volumetric flow rate of effluent gas, dscm/hr P = total kiln feed (dry basis), Mg/hr

• Except as provided in §63.1349(e), performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(1) shall be repeated every five years. (§63.1349(c)) Monitoring: The permittee shall comply with the monitoring requirements listed below:

• Baghouse operation and maintenance: 1. Check and document the baghouse pressure drop weekly. If the pressure drop falls out of the normal operating range, specified by the manufacturer, corrective action shall be taken within eight (8) hours to return the pressure drop to normal. 2. Check the cleaning sequence of the baghouse monthly. 3. Thoroughly inspect bags for leaks and wear quarterly. 4. Inspect every six (6) months all components that are not subject to wear or plugging, including structural components, housing, ducts and hoods. If leaks or abnormal conditions are detected the appropriate measures for remediation shall be implemented within eight (8) hours. Bag replacement should be documented. Maintain a written record of the inspection and any action resulting from the inspection. All instruments and control equipment shall be calibrated, maintained, and operated according to the manufacture specifications.. Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by §63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b)) (1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1)) (2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and (§63.1355(b)(2)) (3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

• The permittee shall maintain a written or electronic record of all inspections and any action resulting from the inspection. These records shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of Natural Resources’ personnel upon request. Reporting:

• The permittee shall comply with the reporting requirements for the performance test stated in Permit Condition: PW007.

• As required by §63.10(d)(2), the owner or operator shall report the results of performance tests as part of the notification of compliance status. (§63.1354(b)(1)) The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 92 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0390-002 through EU0400-002
10 CSR 10-2.030 Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation: The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of 42.387 lbs/hr from each clinker cooler. Monitoring: The permittee shall comply with the monitoring requirements listed below:

• Baghouse operation and maintenance: 1. Check and document the baghouse pressure drop weekly. If the pressure drop falls out of the normal operating range, specified by the manufacturer, corrective action shall be taken within eight (8) hours to return the pressure drop to normal. 2. Check the cleaning sequence of the baghouse monthly. 3. Thoroughly inspect bags for leaks and wear quarterly. 4. Inspect every six (6) months all components that are not subject to wear or plugging, including structural components, housing, ducts and hoods. If leaks or abnormal conditions are detected the appropriate measures for remediation shall be implemented within eight (8) hours. Bag replacement should be documented. Maintain a written record of the inspection and any action resulting from the inspection. All instruments and control equipment shall be calibrated, maintained, and operated according to the manufacturer’s specifications. Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain a written or electronic record of all inspections and any action resulting from the inspection.

• The permittee shall retain the calculations showing compliance with 10 CSR 10-2.030.

• These records shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of Natural Resources’ personnel upon request. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 93 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0390-003 through EU0400-003 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation: No owner or operator shall cause to be discharged into the atmosphere from the clinker cooler any gases which exhibit opacity greater than ten percent. (§63.1345(a)(2)) Performance Testing:

• The opacity exhibited during the period of the Method 5 performance test for particulate matter required by §63.1349(b)(1)(i) shall be determined as required in §63.1349(b)(1)(v) through (vi). (§63.1349(b)(1))

• Except as provided in §63.1349(b)(1)(vi), the opacity exhibited during the period of the Method 5 performance tests required by §63.1349(b)(1)(i) shall be determined through the use of a continuous opacity monitor (COM). The maximum six-minute average opacity during the three Method 5 test runs shall be determined during each Method 5 test run, and used to demonstrate initial compliance with the applicable opacity limits of §63.1343(b)(2). (§63.1349(b)(1)(v))

• Each owner or operator of a clinker cooler using a fabric filter and if the control device exhausts through a monovent, or if the use of a COM in accordance with the installation specifications of Performance Specification 1 (PS-1) of appendix B to part 60 of this chapter is not feasible, a test shall be conducted in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter during each Method 5 performance test required by §63.1349(b)(1)(i). The maximum six-minute average opacity shall be determined during the three Method 5 test runs, and used to demonstrate initial compliance with the applicable opacity limits of §63.1343(b)(2). (§63.1349(b)(1)(vi)) Monitoring:

• The owner or operator of a clinker cooler shall monitor opacity at each point where emissions are vented from the clinker cooler in accordance with §63.1350(d)(1) through (d)(3). §63.1350(d)

• Except as provide in §63.1350(d)(2), the owner or operator shall install, calibrate, maintain, and continuously operate a COM located at the outlet of the clinker cooler PM control device to continuously monitor the opacity. The COM shall be installed, maintained, calibrated, and operated as required by subpart A, general provisions of this part, and according to PS-1 of appendix B to part 60 of this chapter. (§63.1350(d)(1))

• The owner or operator of a clinker cooler using a fabric filter and if the fabric filter exhausts through a monovent, or if the use of a COM in accordance with the installation specifications of PS-1 of appendix B to part 60 of this chapter is not feasible, the owner or operator must monitor opacity in accordance with §63.1350(d)(2)(i) through (ii). (§63.1350(d)(2)) (1) Perform daily visual opacity observations of each stack in accordance with the procedures of Method 9 of appendix A of part 60 of this chapter. The Method 9 test shall be conducted while the affected source is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur within the day. The duration of the Method 9 test shall be at least 30 minutes each day. (§63.1350(d)(2)(i)) (2) Use the Method 9 procedures to monitor and record the average opacity for each sixminute period during the test. (§63.1350(d)(2)(ii))

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 94 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

• To remain in compliance, the opacity must be maintained such that the 6-minute average opacity for any 6-minute block period does not exceed 10 percent. If the average opacity for any 6-minute block period exceeds 10 percent, this shall constitute a violation of the standard. (§63.1350(d)(3)) Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by §63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b)) (1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1)) (2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and (§63.1355(b)(2)) (3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3))

• The owner or operator of an affected source equipped with a continuous monitoring system shall maintain all records required by §63.10(c). (§63.1355(c)) Reporting:

• As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2))

• As required by §63.10(e)(2), the owner or operator of an affected source using a continuous opacity monitoring system to determine opacity compliance during any performance test required under §63.7 and described in §63.6(d)(6) shall report the results of the continuous opacity monitoring system performance evaluation conducted under §63.8(e). (§63.1354(b)(7))

• As required by §63.10(e)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source equipped with a continuous emission monitor shall submit an excess emissions and continuous monitoring system performance report for any event when the continuous monitoring system data indicates the source is not in compliance with the applicable emission limitation or operating parameter limit. (§63.1354(b)(8))

• If the total continuous monitoring system downtime for any CEM or any continuous monitoring system (CMS) for the reporting period is ten percent or greater of the total operating time for the reporting period, the owner or operator shall submit an excess emissions and continuous monitoring performance report along with the summary report (mentioned in PW003). (§63.1354(b)(10)) The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 95 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0390-004 through EU0400-004
10 CSR 10-2.060 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants 

### 10 CSR 10-6.220 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation: No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity. Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained: 1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer. Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting: 1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units, 2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and 3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 96 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## EU0410 through EU0470 EU0410 – Clinker Roll Crusher EU0420 – Clinker Reclaim and Transfer Station (Unloading Mine or Purchased Clinker to Silos) EU0430 - Clinker Transfer from Roll Crusher to Silos (#7 Belt) EU0440 – Clinker Silos EU0450 – Clinker Loadout Station #1 EU0460 – Clinker Loadout Station #2 EU0470 – Gypsum Silos/Gypsum Transfer Conveyors

General Description: Clinker and Gypsum Handling: Systems. Installed: 1952 - 1954 Control Devices: Fabric Filters Manufacturer/Model #: EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-26 through EP-30 & EP-32


## Permit Condition EU0410-001 through EU0470-001 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Opacity
Emission Limitation: The owner or operator of each new or existing raw material, clinker, or finished product storage bin; conveying system transfer point; bagging system; and bulk loading or unloading system shall not cause to be discharged any gases from raw material, clinker, or finished product storage bin; conveying system transfer point; bagging system; and bulk loading or unloading system which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent. (§63.1348) Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the raw material, clinker, or finished product storage bin; conveying system transfer point; bagging system; and bulk loading or unloading system opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when the raw material, clinker, or finished product storage bin; conveying system transfer point; bagging system; and bulk loading or unloading system is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The maximum six-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to determine whether the raw material, clinker, or finished product storage bin; conveying system transfer point; bagging system; and bulk loading or unloading system is in initial compliance with the standard. The duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be 3-hours (30 6-minute averages), except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to 1- hour if the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)):

(1) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i)); (2) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent for the first 1-hour period. (§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five years. (§63.1349(c))

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 97 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

Monitoring:

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly 1-minute visible emissions test of each affected source in accordance with Method 22 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The test must be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests for any affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semi-annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must conduct a 6-minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The Method 9 test must begin within one hour of any observation of visible emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv)) Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by §63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b))

(1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1)) (2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and (§63.1355(b)(2)) (3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3)) Reporting: As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2)) The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 98 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0410-002 through EU0470-002
10 CSR 10-2.060 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants 

### 10 CSR 10-6.220 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation: No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity. Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained: 1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer. Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting: 1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units, 2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and 3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 99 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0410-003 through EU0470-003
10 CSR 10-2.030 Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation: The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of :

• 48.43 lbs/hr from any of EU0410, EU0430, ;

• 42.97 lbs/hr from any of EU0420, EU0440, and 0450;

• 30.51 lbs/hr from EU0460; and

• 40.04 lbs/hr from EU0470 Monitoring: None Record Keeping: None Reporting: The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.


## EU0480 through EU0490 EU0480 – Finish Mill #1 Feed Belt EU0490 – Finish Mill #1 Weigh Hopper

General Description: Finish Mill #1 Associated Equipment Installed: 1952 Control Device: Baghouse Manufacturer/Model #: Nordberg EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-34


## Permit Condition EU0480-001 through EU0490-001 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Opacity
Emission Limitation: The owner or operator shall not cause to be discharged any gases from these affected sources which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent. (§63.1348) Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with these affected sources opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when these affected sources are operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The maximum six-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to determine whether these affected sources are in initial compliance with the standard. The duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be 3-hours (30 6-minute averages), except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to 1-hour if the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)):

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 100 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

(1) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i)); (2) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent for the first 1-hour period. (§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five years. (§63.1349(c)) Monitoring:

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly 1-minute visible emissions test of each affected source in accordance with Method 22 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The test must be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests for any affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semi-annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must conduct a 6-minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The Method 9 test must begin within one hour of any observation of visible emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv)) Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by §63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b)) (1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1)) (2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and (§63.1355(b)(2)) (3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3)) Reporting: As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2)) The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 101 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0480-002 through EU0490-002
10 CSR 10-2.060 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants 

### 10 CSR 10-6.220 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation: No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity. Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained: 1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer. Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting: 1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units, 2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and 3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 102 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0480-003 through EU0490-003
10 CSR 10-2.030 Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation: The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of 40.52 lbs/hr from any of the finish mill #1 associated equipment. Monitoring: The permittee shall comply with the monitoring requirements listed below:

• Baghouse operation and maintenance: 1. Check and document the baghouse pressure drop weekly. If the pressure drop falls out of the normal operating range, specified by the manufacturer, corrective action shall be taken within eight (8) hours to return the pressure drop to normal. 2. Check the cleaning sequence of the baghouse monthly. 3. Thoroughly inspect bags for leaks and wear quarterly. 4. Inspect every six (6) months all components that are not subject to wear or plugging, including structural components, housing, ducts and hoods. If leaks or abnormal conditions are detected the appropriate measures for remediation shall be implemented within eight (8) hours. Bag replacement should be documented. Maintain a written record of the inspection and any action resulting from the inspection. All instruments and control equipment shall be calibrated, maintained, and operated according to the manufacturer’s specifications. Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain a written or electronic record of all inspections and any action resulting from the inspection.

• The permittee shall retain the calculations showing compliance with 10 CSR 10-2.030.

• These records shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of Natural Resources’ personnel upon request. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 103 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## EU0500 through EU0510 EU0510 - Finish Mill #1 Grinder EU0520 - Finish Mill #1 Air Separator

General Description: Finish Mill # 1 Grinder and Air Separator Installed: 1952 Control Device: Baghouse Manufacturer/Model #: Nordberg EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-34


## Permit Condition EU0500-001 through EU0510-001 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation: The owner or operator of each finish mill shall not cause to be discharged from the mill sweep or air separator air pollution control devices any gases which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent. (§63.1347) Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the finish mill opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when the finish mill is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The maximum six-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to determine whether the finish mill is in initial compliance with the standard. The duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be 3-hours (30 6-minute averages), except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to 1-hour if the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)): (1) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i)); (2) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent for the first 1-hour period. (§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five years. (§63.1349(c)) Monitoring:

• The owner or operator of a finish mill shall monitor opacity by conducting daily visual emissions observations of the mill sweep and air separator PMCDs of these affected sources, in accordance with the procedures of Method 22 of appendix A of part 60 of this chapter. The Method 22 test shall be conducted while the affected source is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur within the day. The duration of the Method 22 test shall be six minutes. If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 visible emissions test, the owner or operator must (§63.1350(e)): (1) Initiate, within one-hour, the corrective actions specified in the site specific operating and maintenance plan developed in accordance with §63.1350(a)(1) and (a)(2). (§63.1350(e)(1))

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 104 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

(2) Within 24 hours of the end of the Method 22 test in which visible emissions were observed, conduct a visual opacity test of each stack from which visible emissions were observed in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A of part 60 of this chapter. The duration of the Method 9 test shall be thirty minutes. (§63.1350(e)(2)) Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by §63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b)) (1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1)) (2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and (§63.1355(b)(2)) (3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3)) Reporting: As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2)) The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 105 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0500-002 through EU0510-002
10 CSR 10-2.060 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants 

### 10 CSR 10-6.220 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation: No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity. Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained: 1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer. Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting: 1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units, 2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and 3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 106 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0500-003 through EU0510-003
10 CSR 10-2.030 Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation: The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of 40.52 lbs/hr either from the finish mill or the aspirator. Monitoring: The permittee shall comply with the monitoring requirements listed below:

• Baghouse operation and maintenance: 1. Check and document the baghouse pressure drop weekly. If the pressure drop falls out of the normal operating range, specified by the manufacturer, corrective action shall be taken within eight (8) hours to return the pressure drop to normal. 2. Check the cleaning sequence of the baghouse monthly. 3. Thoroughly inspect bags for leaks and wear quarterly. 4. Inspect every six (6) months all components that are not subject to wear or plugging, including structural components, housing, ducts and hoods. If leaks or abnormal conditions are detected the appropriate measures for remediation shall be implemented within eight (8) hours. Bag replacement should be documented. Maintain a written record of the inspection and any action resulting from the inspection. All instruments and control equipment shall be calibrated, maintained, and operated according to the manufacturer’s specifications. Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain a written or electronic record of all inspections and any action resulting from the inspection.

• The permittee shall retain the calculations showing compliance with 10 CSR 10-2.030.

• These records shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of Natural Resources’ personnel upon request. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 107 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## EU0520 through EU0530 EU0520 – Finish Mill #2 Feed Belt EU0530 – Finish Mill #2 Weigh Hopper EU0540 – Finish Mill Fringe Tank

General Description: Finish Mill #2 Associated Equipment Installed: 1954 Finish Mill Fringe Tank installed 1998 Control Device: Baghouse Manufacturer/Model #: Nordberg EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-35 & 35A


## Permit Condition EU0520-001 through EU0540-001 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation: The owner or operator shall not cause to be discharged any gases from these affected sources which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent. (§63.1348) Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with these affected sources opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when these affected sources are operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The maximum six-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to determine whether these affected sources are in initial compliance with the standard. The duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be 3-hours (30 6- minute averages), except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to 1-hour if the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)): (1) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i)); (2) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent for the first 1-hour period. (§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five years. (§63.1349(c)) Monitoring:

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly 1-minute visible emissions test of each affected source in accordance with Method 22 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The test must be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests for any affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semi-annually

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 108 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must conduct a 6-minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The Method 9 test must begin within one hour of any observation of visible emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv)) Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by §63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b)) (1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1)) (2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and (§63.1355(b)(2)) (3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3)) Reporting: As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2)) The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 109 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0520-002 through EU0540-002
10 CSR 10-2.060 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants 

### 10 CSR 10-6.220 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation: No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity. Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained: 1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer. Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting: 1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units, 2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and 3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 110 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0520-003 through EU0540-003
10 CSR 10-2.030 Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation: The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of 41.57 lbs/hr from any of the finish mill #2 associated equipment. Monitoring: The permittee shall comply with the monitoring requirements listed below:

• Baghouse operation and maintenance: 1. Check and document the baghouse pressure drop weekly. If the pressure drop falls out of the normal operating range, specified by the manufacturer, corrective action shall be taken within eight (8) hours to return the pressure drop to normal. 2. Check the cleaning sequence of the baghouse monthly. 3. Thoroughly inspect bags for leaks and wear quarterly. 4. Inspect every six (6) months all components that are not subject to wear or plugging, including structural components, housing, ducts and hoods. If leaks or abnormal conditions are detected the appropriate measures for remediation shall be implemented within eight (8) hours. Bag replacement should be documented. Maintain a written record of the inspection and any action resulting from the inspection. All instruments and control equipment shall be calibrated, maintained, and operated according to the manufacturer’s specifications. Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain a written or electronic record of all inspections and any action resulting from the inspection.

• The permittee shall retain the calculations showing compliance with 10 CSR 10-2.030.

• These records shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of Natural Resources’ personnel upon request. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 111 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## EU0550 through EU0560 EU0550 - Finish Mill #2 Grinder EU0560 - Finish Mill #2 Air Separator

General Description: Finish Mill # 1 Grinder and Air Separator Installed: 1954 Control Device: Baghouse Manufacturer/Model #: Nordberg EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-35


## Permit Condition EU0550-001 through EU0560-001 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation: The owner or operator of each finish mill shall not cause to be discharged from the mill sweep or air separator air pollution control devices any gases which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent. (§63.1347) Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the finish mill opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when the finish mill is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The maximum six-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to determine whether the finish mill is in initial compliance with the standard. The duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be 3-hours (30 6-minute averages), except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to 1-hour if the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)): (1) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i)); (2) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent for the first 1-hour period. (§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five years. (§63.1349(c)) Monitoring:

• The owner or operator of a finish mill shall monitor opacity by conducting daily visual emissions observations of the mill sweep and air separator PMCDs of these affected sources, in accordance with the procedures of Method 22 of appendix A of part 60 of this chapter. The Method 22 test shall be conducted while the affected source is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur within the day. The duration of the Method 22 test shall be six minutes. If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 visible emissions test, the owner or operator must (§63.1350(e)): 1) Initiate, within one-hour, the corrective actions specified in the site specific operating and maintenance plan developed in accordance with §63.1350(a)(1) and (a)(2). (§63.1350(e)(1))

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 112 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

2) Within 24 hours of the end of the Method 22 test in which visible emissions were observed, conduct a visual opacity test of each stack from which visible emissions were observed in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A of part 60 of this chapter. The duration of the Method 9 test shall be thirty minutes. (§63.1350(e)(2)) Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by §63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b)) (1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1)) (2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and (§63.1355(b)(2)) (3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3)) Reporting: As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2)) The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 113 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0550-002 through EU0560-002
10 CSR 10-2.060 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants 

### 10 CSR 10-6.220 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation: No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity. Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained: 1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer. Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting: 1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units, 2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and 3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 114 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0550-003 through EU0560-003
10 CSR 10-2.030 Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation: The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of 41.57 lbs/hr either from the finish mill or the aspirator. Monitoring: The permittee shall comply with the monitoring requirements listed below:

• Baghouse operation and maintenance: 1. Check and document the baghouse pressure drop weekly. If the pressure drop falls out of the normal operating range, specified by the manufacturer, corrective action shall be taken within eight (8) hours to return the pressure drop to normal. 2. Check the cleaning sequence of the baghouse monthly. 3. Thoroughly inspect bags for leaks and wear quarterly. 4. Inspect every six (6) months all components that are not subject to wear or plugging, including structural components, housing, ducts and hoods. If leaks or abnormal conditions are detected the appropriate measures for remediation shall be implemented within eight (8) hours. Bag replacement should be documented. Maintain a written record of the inspection and any action resulting from the inspection. All instruments and control equipment shall be calibrated, maintained, and operated according to the manufacturer’s specifications. Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain a written or electronic record of all inspections and any action resulting from the inspection.

• The permittee shall retain the calculations showing compliance with 10 CSR 10-2.030.

• These records shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of Natural Resources’ personnel upon request. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 115 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## EU0570 through EU0580 EU0570 – Finish Mill #3 Feed Belt (Belt 12A) EU0580 – Finish Mill #3 Weigh Hopper

General Description: Finish Mill #3 Associated Equipment Installed: 1984 Control Device: Baghouse Manufacturer/Model #: Nordberg EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-33 & EP-37


## Permit Condition EU0570-001 through EU0580-001 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation: The owner or operator shall not cause to be discharged any gases from these affected sources which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent. (§63.1348) Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with these affected sources opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when these affected sources are operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The maximum six-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to determine whether these affected sources are in initial compliance with the standard. The duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be 3-hours (30 6- minute averages), except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to 1-hour if the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)): (1) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i)); (2) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent for the first 1-hour period. (§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five years. (§63.1349(c)) Monitoring:

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly 1-minute visible emissions test of each affected source in accordance with Method 22 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The test must be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests for any affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semi-annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 116 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must conduct a 6-minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The Method 9 test must begin within one hour of any observation of visible emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv)) Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by §63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b)) (1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1)) (2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and (§63.1355(b)(2)) (3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3)) Reporting: As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2)) The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 117 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0570-002 through EU0580-002
10 CSR 10-2.060 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants 

### 10 CSR 10-6.220 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation: No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity. Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained: 1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer. Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting: 1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units, 2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and 3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 118 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0570-003 through EU0580-003
10 CSR 10-2.030 Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation: The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of 39.96 lbs/hr from any of the finish mill #3 associated equipment. Monitoring: The permittee shall comply with the monitoring requirements listed below:

• Baghouse operation and maintenance: 1. Check and document the baghouse pressure drop weekly. If the pressure drop falls out of the normal operating range, specified by the manufacturer, corrective action shall be taken within eight (8) hours to return the pressure drop to normal. 2. Check the cleaning sequence of the baghouse monthly. 3. Thoroughly inspect bags for leaks and wear quarterly. 4. Inspect every six (6) months all components that are not subject to wear or plugging, including structural components, housing, ducts and hoods. If leaks or abnormal conditions are detected the appropriate measures for remediation shall be implemented within eight (8) hours. Bag replacement should be documented. Maintain a written record of the inspection and any action resulting from the inspection. All instruments and control equipment shall be calibrated, maintained, and operated according to the manufacturer’s specifications. Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain a written or electronic record of all inspections and any action resulting from the inspection.

• The permittee shall retain the calculations showing compliance with 10 CSR 10-2.030.

• These records shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of Natural Resources’ personnel upon request. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 119 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## EU0590 through EU0600 EU0590 - Finish Mill #3 Grinder EU0600 - Finish Mill #3 Air Separator

General Description: Finish Mill # 1 Grinder and Air Separator Installed: 1984 Control Device: Baghouse Manufacturer/Model #: Nordberg EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-37


## Permit Condition EU0590-001 through EU0600-001 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation: The owner or operator of each finish mill shall not cause to be discharged from the mill sweep or air separator air pollution control devices any gases which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent. (§63.1347) Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the finish mill opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when the finish mill is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The maximum six-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to determine whether the finish mill is in initial compliance with the standard. The duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be 3-hours (30 6-minute averages), except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to 1-hour if the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)): (1) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i)); (2) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent for the first 1-hour period. (§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five years. (§63.1349(c)) Monitoring:

• The owner or operator of a finish mill shall monitor opacity by conducting daily visual emissions observations of the mill sweep and air separator PMCDs of these affected sources, in accordance with the procedures of Method 22 of appendix A of part 60 of this chapter. The Method 22 test shall be conducted while the affected source is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur within the day. The duration of the Method 22 test shall be six minutes. If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 visible emissions test, the owner or operator must (§63.1350(e)): (1) Initiate, within one-hour, the corrective actions specified in the site specific operating and maintenance plan developed in accordance with §63.1350(a)(1) and (a)(2). (§63.1350(e)(1))

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 120 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

(2) Within 24 hours of the end of the Method 22 test in which visible emissions were observed, conduct a visual opacity test of each stack from which visible emissions were observed in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A of part 60 of this chapter. The duration of the Method 9 test shall be thirty minutes. (§63.1350(e)(2)) Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by §63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b)) (1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1)) (2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and (§63.1355(b)(2)) (3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3)) Reporting: As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2)) The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 121 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0590-002 through EU0600-002
10 CSR 10-2.060 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants 

### 10 CSR 10-6.220 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation: No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity. Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained: 1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer. Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting: 1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units, 2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and 3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 122 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0590-003 through EU0600-003
10 CSR 10-2.030 Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation: The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of 39.96 lbs/hr either from the finish mill or the aspirator. Monitoring: The permittee shall comply with the monitoring requirements listed below:

• Baghouse operation and maintenance: 1. Check and document the baghouse pressure drop weekly. If the pressure drop falls out of the normal operating range, specified by the manufacturer, corrective action shall be taken within eight (8) hours to return the pressure drop to normal. 2. Check the cleaning sequence of the baghouse monthly. 3. Thoroughly inspect bags for leaks and wear quarterly. 4. Inspect every six (6) months all components that are not subject to wear or plugging, including structural components, housing, ducts and hoods. If leaks or abnormal conditions are detected the appropriate measures for remediation shall be implemented within eight (8) hours. Bag replacement should be documented. Maintain a written record of the inspection and any action resulting from the inspection. All instruments and control equipment shall be calibrated, maintained, and operated according to the manufacturer’s specifications. Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain a written or electronic record of all inspections and any action resulting from the inspection.

• The permittee shall retain the calculations showing compliance with 10 CSR 10-2.030.

• These records shall be made available immediately for inspection to the Department of Natural Resources’ personnel upon request. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 123 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## EU0610 through EU0690 EU0610 – Cement Storage Transfer Point (EP-38) EU0620 – Pneumatic Cement Conveyor #1 (EP-39) EU0630 - Pneumatic Cement Conveyor #2 (EP-40) EU0640 – Cement Unloading Silos – Truck #1 (EP-41) EU0650 – Cement Unloading Silos – Truck #2 (EP-42) EU0660 – Barge Loadout Station (EP-43) EU0670 – Railcar Loadout Station (EP-44) EU0680 – Truck Loadout Station #1 (EP-45) EU0690 – Truck Loadout Station #2 (EP-47)

General Description: Cement Handling and Loadout: Cement from the finish milling circuits is pneumatically conveyed to cement storage silos. From the storage silos, cement can be pneumatically conveyed to either barge, rail or truck loadout facilities. Installed: 1937 -1960 Control Device: Baghouse Manufacturer/Model #: EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-38 through EP-45, and EP-47


## Permit Condition EU0610-001 through EU0690-001 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry – Opacity

Emission Limitation: The owner or operator of each finished product storage bin; conveying system transfer point; bagging system; and bulk loading or unloading system shall not cause to be discharged any gases from finished product storage bin; conveying system transfer point; bagging system; and bulk loading or unloading system which exhibit opacity in excess of ten percent. (§63.1348) Performance Testing:

• The owner or operator shall demonstrate initial compliance with the finished product storage bin; conveying system transfer point; bagging system; and bulk loading or unloading system opacity limit by conducting a test in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The performance test shall be conducted under the conditions that exist when the finished product storage bin; conveying system transfer point; bagging system; and bulk loading or unloading system is operating at the highest load or capacity level reasonably expected to occur. The maximum six-minute average opacity exhibited during the test period shall be used to determine whether the finished product storage bin; conveying system transfer point; bagging system; and bulk loading or unloading system is in initial compliance with the standard. The duration of the Method 9 performance test shall be 3-hours (30 6-minute averages), except that the duration of the Method 9 performance test may be reduced to 1-hour if the conditions of §63.1349(b)(2)(i) through §63.1349(b)(2)(ii) apply (§63.1349(b)(2)): (1) There are no individual readings greater than 10 percent opacity (§63.1349(b)(2)(i));

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 124 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

(2) There are no more than three readings of 10 percent for the first 1-hour period. (§63.1349(b)(2)(ii))

• Performance tests required under §63.1349(b)(2) shall be repeated every five years. (§63.1349(c)) Monitoring:

• The owner or operator subject to a limitation on opacity under §63.1346 or §63.1348 shall monitor opacity in accordance with the operation and maintenance plan developed in accordance with §63.1350(a). (§63.1350(j))

• The owner or operator must conduct a monthly 1-minute visible emissions test of each affected source in accordance with Method 22 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The test must be conducted while the affected source is in operation. (§63.1350(a)(4)(i))

• If no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests for any affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from monthly to semi-annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any semi-annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(ii))

• If no visible emissions are observed during the semi-annual test for any affected source, the owner or operator may decrease the frequency of testing from semi-annually to annually for that affected source. If visible emissions are observed during any annual test, the owner or operator must resume testing of that affected source on a monthly basis and maintain that schedule until no visible emissions are observed in six consecutive monthly tests. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iii))

• If visible emissions are observed during any Method 22 test, the owner or operator must conduct a 6-minute test of opacity in accordance with Method 9 of appendix A to part 60 of this chapter. The Method 9 test must begin within one hour of any observation of visible emissions. (§63.1350(a)(4)(iv)) Record Keeping:

• The owner or operator shall maintain files of all information (including all reports and notifications) required by this section recorded in a form suitable and readily available for inspection and review as required by §63.10(b)(1). The files shall be retained for at least five years following the date of each occurrence, measurement, maintenance, corrective action, report, or record. At a minimum, the most recent two years of data shall be retained on site. The remaining three years of data may be retained off site. The files may be maintained on microfilm, on a computer, on floppy disks, on magnetic tape, or on microfiche. (§63.1355(a))

• The owner or operator shall maintain records for each affected source as required by §63.10(b)(2) and (b)(3); and (§63.1355(b)) (1) All documentation supporting initial notifications and notifications of compliance status under §63.9; (§63.1355(b)(1)) (2) All records of applicability determination, including supporting analyses; and (§63.1355(b)(2)) (3) If the owner or operator has been granted a waiver under §63.8(f)(6), any information demonstrating whether a source is meeting the requirements for a waiver of record keeping or reporting requirements. (§63.1355(b)(3)) Reporting: As required by §63.10(d)(3), the owner or operator of an affected source shall report the opacity results from tests required by §63.1349. (§63.1354(b)(2)) The compliance date for an owner or operator of an existing affected source subject to the provisions of this subpart is June 10, 2002. [§ 63.1351(a)]

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 125 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0610-002 through EU0690-002
10 CSR 10-2.060 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants 

### 10 CSR 10-6.220 Restriction of Emission of Visible Air Contaminants

Emission Limitation: No owner or other person shall cause or permit to be discharged into the atmosphere from any source any visible emission greater than twenty percent (20%) opacity.

• Exception: A person may discharge into the atmosphere from any single source of emissions for a period(s) aggregating not more than six (6) minutes in any sixty (60) minutes visible emissions not equal to nor greater than sixty percent (60%) opacity. Monitoring:

• The permittee shall conduct opacity readings on this emission unit using the procedures contained in USEPA Test Method 22. Readings are only required when the emission unit is operating and when the weather conditions allow. If no visible or other significant emissions are observed using these procedures, then no further observations would be required. For emission units with visible emissions perceived or believed to exceed the applicable opacity standard, the source representative would then conduct a Method 9 observation.

• The following monitoring schedule must be maintained: 1. Weekly observations shall be conducted for a minimum of eight (8) consecutive weeks after permit issuance. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 2. Observations must be made once every two (2) weeks for a period of eight (8) weeks. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly. Should no violation of this regulation be observed during this period, then: 3. Observations must be made once per month. If a violation is noted, monitoring reverts to weekly.

• If the source reverts to weekly monitoring at any time, monitoring frequency will progress in an identical manner from the initial monitoring frequency.

• The permittee shall conduct an annual opacity measurement on the emission unit by USEPA Test Method 9 with a certified Method 9 observer. Record Keeping:

• The permittee shall maintain records of all observation results (see Attachment B), noting: 1. Whether any air emissions (except for water vapor) were visible from the emission units, 2. All emission units from which visible emissions occurred, and 3. Whether the visible emissions were normal for the process.

• The permittee shall maintain records of any equipment malfunctions.

• The permittee shall maintain records of the annual USEPA Method 9 opacity test and any other Method 9 test performed in accordance with this permit condition. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of the opacity limit established by 10 CSR 10-6.220, or any malfunction which could cause an opacity exceedance. 10 CSR 10-6.220 is a state-only requirement. The provisions of 10 CSR 10-2.060 expire and the provisions of 10 CSR 10-6.220 are federally enforceable once 10 CSR 10-6.220 is incorporated into the federally-approved SIP as a final EPA action.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 126 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## Permit Condition EU0610-003 through EU0690-003 10 CSR 10-2.030 Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter from Industrial Processes

Emission Limitation: The permittee shall not emit particulate matter in excess of :

• 51.07 lbs/hr from EU0610; and

• 44.39 lbs/hr from any of EU0620 through EU0690.. Monitoring: None Record Keeping: None Reporting: The permittee shall report to the APCP Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of 10 CSR 10-2.030.



## EU0700 Ethanolamine Storage Tank

General Description: 50,300 gallon ethanolamine fixed roof storage tank Installed: 1988 Manufacturer/Model #: EIQ Reference # (1988): EP-51



## Permit Condition EU0700-001 10 CSR 10-6.070 New Source Performance Regulations 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart Kb Standards of Performance for Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessels (Including Petroleum Liquid Storage Vessels) for Which Construction, Reconstruction, or Modification Commenced After July 23, 1984

Emission Limitation: Except as specified in paragraphs (a) and (b) of §60.116b, vessels either with a capacity greater than or equal to 151 m 3 storing a liquid with a maximum true vapor pressure less than 3.5 kPa or with a capacity greater than or equal to 75 m 3 but less than 151 m 3 storing a liquid with a maximum true vapor pressure less than 15.0 kPa are exempt from the General Provisions (part 60, subpart A) and from the provisions of this subpart. [§60.110b(c)] Monitoring: The owner or operator of each storage vessel as specified in §60.110b(a) shall keep readily accessible records showing the dimension of the storage vessel and an analysis showing the capacity of the storage vessel. [§60.116b(b)] Record Keeping: The owner or operator shall keep copies of all records required by this section, except for the record required by §60.116b(b) of this section, for at least 2 years. The record required by §60.116b(b) of this section will be kept for the life of the source. [§60.116b(a)] Reporting: None

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 127 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## EU0710 8,000 Gallon Gasoline RVP-13 Underground Storage Tank

General Description: 8,000-gallon gasoline RVP-13 underground storage tank equipped with submerged fill pipe and vapor recovery system. Installed: 1990 Manufacturer/Model #: Owens Corning EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-52



## Permit Condition EU0710-001 10 CSR 10-2.260 Control of Petroleum Liquid Storage, Loading and transfer

Emission Limitation: The permittee shall not cause or permit the transfer of gasoline from any delivery vessel into any stationary storage tank with a capacity greater than 2000 gallons unless the storage tank is equipped with a submerged fill pipe and a vapor recovery system. The vapor recovery system shall collect no less than 90 percent by volume of the volume of the vapors displaced from the stationary storage tank. Monitoring: The permittee shall monitor the vapor recovery system and the gasoline loading equipment in a manner that prevents:

• Gauge pressure from exceeding 4500 pascals (18 in. of water) in the delivery vessel

• A reading equal to or greater than 100% of the lower explosive limit (LEL, measured as propane) at 2.5 centimeters from all points on the perimeter of a potential leak source during loading or transfer operations

• Visible liquid leaks during loading or transfer operations Record Keeping: Keep records documenting the number of delivery vessels unloaded and their owners. Also keep records of routine and unscheduled maintenance and repairs and of all results of tests conducted. Records shall be kept for five (5) years and made available upon request. Reporting: None

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 128 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## EU0720 12,000 Gallon #2 Fuel (Diesel) Oil Underground Storage Tank

General Description: 12,000-gallon diesel (#2)fuel underground storage tank . Installed: 1990 Manufacturer/Model #: Owens Corning EIQ Reference # (1998): EP-52



## Permit Condition EU0720-001
10 CSR 10-6.070 New Source Performance Regulations 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart Kb Standards of Performance for Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessels (Including Petroleum Liquid Storage Vessels) for Which Construction, Reconstruction, or Modification Commenced After July 23, 1984

Emission Limitation: Except as specified in paragraphs (a) and (b) of §60.116b, storage vessels either with design capacity less than 75 m 3 are exempt from the General Provisions (part 60, subpart A) and from the provisions of this subpart. [§60.110b(b)]



### . Monitoring: The owner or operator of each storage vessel as specified in §60.110b(a) shall keep readily accessible records showing the dimension of the storage vessel and an analysis showing the capacity of the storage vessel. [§60.116b(b)] Record Keeping: The owner or operator shall keep copies of all records required by this section, except for the record required by §60.116b(b) of this section, for at least 2 years. The record required by §60.116b(b) of this section will be kept for the life of the source. [§60.116b(a)] Reporting: None

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 129 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## EU0730 Safety-Kleen Parts Washers (Degreasing Units)

General Description: Three (3) Parts Washers: Cold cleaning units and use Stoddard solvent. Manufacturer/Model #: Safety-Kleen EIQ Reference # (1998) EP-57



## Permit Condition EU0730-001
10 CSR 10-2.210 Control of Emissions from Solvent Metal Cleaning

Emission Limitation: The permittee shall comply with the operating procedures and operator training requirements as specified in this rule unless the equipment conforms to the specifications of this rule. Monitoring: The permittee shall monitor the throughputs of the solvents monthly and maintain material safety data sheets of the cleanup solvents used at the installation. Record Keeping: The permittee shall keep monthly inventory records of solvent types and amounts purchased and solvent consumed for a period of five (5) years. The records shall include all types and amounts of solvent containing waste material transferred to either a contract reclamation service or to a disposal installation and all amounts distilled on the premises. The record also shall include maintenance and repair logs. Reporting: The permittee shall report to the Air Pollution Control Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102, no later than ten (10) days after any exceedence of 10 CSR 10-2.210 demonstrated by the appropriate record keeping forms.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 130 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## IV. Core Permit Requirements

The installation shall comply with each of the following emission limitations. Consult the appropriate sections in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) and Code of State Regulations (CSR) for the full text of the applicable requirements.

10 CSR 10-6.050, Start-up, Shutdown and Malfunction Conditions The permittee shall submit the following information to the director not later than fifteen (15) days after receipt of the notice of excess emissions. (a.) Name and location of installation; (b.) Name and telephone number of person responsible for the installation; (c.) The identity of the equipment causing the excess emissions; (d.) The time and duration of the period of excess emissions.; (e.) The cause of the excess emissions; (f.) The type of air contaminant involved; (g.) A best estimate of the magnitude of the excess emissions expressed in the units of the applicable emission control regulation and the operating data and calculations used in estimating the magnitude; (h.) The measures taken to mitigate the extent and duration of the excess emissions; and (i.) The measures taken to remedy the situation which caused the excess emissions and the measures taken or planned to prevent the recurrence of these situations.

10 CSR 10-6.060, Construction Permits Required The permittee shall not commence construction, modification, or major modification of any installation subject to this rule, begin operation after that construction, modification, or major modification, or begin operation of any installation which has been shut down longer than five (5) years without first obtaining a permit from the permitting authority.

10 CSR 10-6.065, Operating Permits The permittee shall file for renewal of this operating permit no sooner than eighteen months, nor later than six months, prior to the expiration date of this operating permit. The permittee shall retain the most current operating permit issued to this installation on-site and shall immediately make such permit available to any Missouri Department of Natural Resources personnel upon request.

10 CSR 10-6.110, Submission of Emission Data, Emission Fees and Process Information The permittee shall complete and submit an Emission Inventory Questionnaire (EIQ) in accordance with the requirements outlined in this rule.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 131 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

10 CSR 10-6.130, Controlling Emissions During Episodes of High Air Pollution Potential This rule specifies the conditions that establish an air pollution alert (yellow/red), watch or emergency and the associated procedures and emissions reduction objectives for dealing with each. The permittee shall submit an appropriate emergency plan if required by the Director.

10 CSR 10-6.150, Circumvention The permittee shall not cause or permit the installation or use of any device or any other means which, without resulting in reduction in the total amount of air contaminant emitted, conceals or dilutes an emission or air contaminant which violates a rule of the Missouri Air Conservation Commission.

10 CSR 10-6.180, Measurement of Emissions of Air Contaminants (a.) The director may require any person responsible for the source of emission of air contaminants to make or have made tests to determine the quantity or nature, or both, of emission of air contaminants from the source. The director may specify testing methods to be used in accordance with good professional practice. The director may observe the testing. All tests shall be performed by qualified personnel. (b.) The director may conduct tests of emissions of air contaminants from any source. Upon request of the director, the person responsible for the source to be tested shall provide necessary ports in stacks or ducts and other safe and proper sampling and testing facilities, exclusive of instruments and sensing devices as may be necessary for proper determination of the emission of air contaminants. (c.) The director shall be given a copy of the test results in writing and signed by the person responsible for the tests.

10 CSR 10-2.070, Restriction of Emission of Odors No person may cause, permit or allow the emission of odorous matter in concentrations and frequencies or for durations that odor can be perceivedwhen one (1) volume of odorous air is diluted with seven (7) volumes of odorfree air for two (2) separate trials not less than fifteen (15) minutes apart within the period of one (1) hour. This requirement is not federally enforceable.

10 CSR 10-2.100, Open Burning Restrictions (a.) The permittee shall not conduct, cause, permit or allow a salvage operation, the disposal of trade wastes or burning of refuse by open burning. (b.) Exception - Open burning of trade waste or vegetation may be permitted only when it can be shown that open burning is the only feasible method of disposal or an emergency exists which requires open burning.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 132 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

(c.) Any person intending to engage in open burning shall file a request to do so with the director. The request shall include the following: (1.) The name, address and telephone number of the person submitting the application; The type of business or activity involved; A description of the proposed equipment and operating practices, the type, quantity and composition of trade wastes and expected composition and amount of air contaminants to be released to the atmosphere where known; (2.) The schedule of burning operations; (3.) The exact location where open burning will be used to dispose of the trade wastes; (4.) Reasons why no method other than open burning is feasible; and (5.) Evidence that the proposed open burning has been approved by the fire control authority which has jurisdiction. (d.) Upon approval of the open burning permit application by the director, the person may proceed with the operation under the terms of the open burning permit. Be aware that such approval shall not exempt Lafarge Corporation from the provisions of any other law, ordinance or regulation. (e.) The permittee shall maintain files with letters from the director approving the open burning operation and previous DNR inspection reports.

.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 133 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014



## V. General Permit Requirements

Permit Duration 10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)1.B. This permit is issued for a term of five (5) years, commencing on the date of issuance. This permit will expire at the end of this period unless renewed.

General Record Keeping and Reporting Requirements 10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)1.C I) Record Keeping A) All required monitoring data and support information shall be retained for a period of at least five (5) years from the date of the monitoring sample, measurement, report or application. B) Copies of all current operating and construction permits issued to this installation shall be kept on-site for as long as the permits are in effect. Copies of these permits shall be made immediately available to any Missouri Department of Natural Resources’ personnel upon request. II) Reporting A) The permittee shall submit a report of all required monitoring by: 1) October 1st for monitoring which covers the January through June time period, and 2) April 1st for monitoring which covers the July through December time period. 3) Exception: Monitoring requirements which require reporting more frequently than semi annually shall report no later than 30 days after the end of the calendar quarter in which the measurements were taken. B) Each report must identify any deviations from emission limitations, monitoring, record keeping, reporting, or any other requirements of the permit. C) All reports shall be submitted to the Air Pollution Control Program, Operating Permit Unit, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102. D) Submit supplemental reports as required or as needed. Supplemental reports are required no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of any applicable rule, regulation or other restriction. All reports of deviations shall identify the cause or probable cause of the deviations and any corrective actions or preventative measures taken. 1) Notice of any deviation resulting from an emergency (or upset) condition as defined in paragraph (6)(C)7 of 10 CSR 10-6.065 (Emergency Provisions) shall be submitted to the permitting authority either verbally or in writing within two (2) working days after the date on which the emission limitation is exceeded due to the emergency, if you wish to assert an affirmative defense. The affirmative defense of emergency shall be demonstrated through properly signed, contemporaneous operating logs, or other relevant evidence that indicate an emergency occurred and that you can identify the cause(s) of the emergency. The permitted installation must show that it was operated properly at the time and that during the period of the emergency the permittee took all reasonable steps to minimize levels of emissions that exceeded the emission standards or requirements in the permit. The notice must contain a description of the

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 134 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

emergency, the steps taken to mitigate emissions, and the corrective actions taken. 2) Any deviation that poses an imminent and substantial danger to public health, safety or the environment shall be reported as soon as practicable. 3) Any other deviations identified in the permit as requiring more frequent reporting than the permittee's semiannual report shall be reported on the schedule specified in the permit. E) Every report submitted shall be certified by the responsible official, except that, if a report of a deviation must be submitted within ten (10) days after the deviation, the report may be submitted without a certification if the report is resubmitted with an appropriate certification within ten (10) days after that, together with any corrected or supplemental information required concerning the deviation. F) The permittee may request confidential treatment of information submitted in any report of deviation. G) These supplemental reports shall be submitted to the Air Pollution Control Program, Enforcement Section, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102 no later than ten (10) days after any exceedance of any applicable rule, regulation, or other restriction.

Risk Management Plans Under Section 112(r) 10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)1.D. The permittee shall comply with the requirements of 40 CFR Part 68, Accidental Release Prevention Requirements. If the permittee has more than a threshold quantity of a regulated substance in process, as determined by 40 CFR Section 68.115, the permittee shall submit a Risk Management Plan in accordance with 40 CFR Part 68 no later than the latest of the following dates: 1) June 21, 1999; 2) Three (3) years after the date on which a regulated substance is first listed under 40 CFR Section 68.130; or 3) The date on which a regulated substance is first present above a threshold quantity in a process.
Severability Clause 10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)1.F. In the event of a successful challenge to any part of this permit, all uncontested permit conditions shall continue to be in force.

General Requirements 10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)1.G 1) The permittee must comply with all of the terms and conditions of this permit. Any noncompliance with a permit condition constitutes a violation and is grounds for enforcement action, permit termination, permit revocation and re-issuance, permit modification or denial of a permit renewal application. 2) The permittee may not use as a defense in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary for the permittee to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the conditions of the permit. 3) The permit may be modified, revoked, reopened, reissued or terminated for cause. Except as provided for minor permit modifications, the filing of an application or request

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 135 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

for a permit modification, revocation and re-issuance, or termination, or the filing of a notification of planned changes or anticipated noncompliance, will not stay any permit condition. 4) This permit does not convey any property rights of any sort, nor grant any exclusive privilege. 5) The permittee shall furnish to the Air Pollution Control Program, upon receipt of a written request and within a reasonable time, any information that the Air Pollution Control Program reasonably may require to determine whether cause exists for modifying, reopening, reissuing or revoking the permit or to determine compliance with the permit. Upon request, the permittee also shall furnish to the Air Pollution Control Program copies of records required to be kept by the permittee. The permittee may make a claim of confidentiality for any information or records submitted pursuant to 10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)1.

Incentive Programs Not Requiring Permit Revisions 10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)1.H. No permit revision will be required for any installation changes made under any approved economic incentive, marketable permit, emissions trading, or other similar programs or processes provided for in this permit.

Title VI I) The permittee shall comply with the standards for labeling of products using ozonedepleting substances pursuant to 40 CFR Part 82, Subpart E: A) All containers in which a class I or class II substance is stored or transported, all products containing a class I substance, and all products directly manufactured with a class I substance must bear the required warning statement if it is being introduced into interstate commerce pursuant to §82.106. B) The placement of the required warning statement must comply with the requirements pursuant to §82.108. C) The form of the label bearing the required warning statement must comply with the requirements pursuant to §82.110. D) No person may modify, remove, or interfere with the required warning statement except as described in §82.112. II) The permittee shall comply with the standards for recycling and emissions reduction pursuant to 40 CFR part 82, Subpart F, except as provided for motor vehicle air conditioners (MVACs) in Subpart B: A) Persons opening appliances for maintenance, service, repair, or disposal must comply with the required practices pursuant to §82.156. B) Equipment used during the maintenance, service, repair, or disposal of appliances must comply with the standards for recycling and recovery equipment pursuant to §82.158. C) Persons performing maintenance, service, repair, or disposal of appliances must be certified by an approved technician certification program pursuant to §82.161. D) Persons disposing of small appliances, MVACs, and MVAC-like appliances must comply with record keeping requirements pursuant to §82.166. ("MVAC-like" appliance as defined at §82.152). E) Persons owning commercial or industrial process refrigeration equipment must comply with the leak repair requirements pursuant to §82.156.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 136 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

F) Owners/operators of appliances normally containing 50 or more pounds of refrigerant must keep records of refrigerant purchased and added to such appliances pursuant to §82.166. III) If the permittee manufactures, transforms, imports, or exports a class I or class II substance, the permittee is subject to all the requirements as specified in 40 CFR part 82, Subpart A, Production and Consumption Controls. IV) If the permittee performs a service on motor (fleet) vehicles when this service involves ozone-depleting substance refrigerant (or regulated substitute substance) in the motor vehicle air conditioner (MVAC), the permittee is subject to all the applicable requirements as specified in 40 CFR part 82, Subpart B, Servicing of Motor Vehicle Air conditioners. The term "motor vehicle" as used in Subpart B does not include a vehicle in which final assembly of the vehicle has not been completed. The term "MVAC" as used in Subpart B does not include the air-tight sealed refrigeration system used as refrigerated cargo, or system used on passenger buses using HCFC-22 refrigerant. The permittee shall be allowed to switch from any ozone-depleting substance to any alternative that is listed in the Significant New Alternatives Program (SNAP) promulgated pursuant to 40 CFR part 82, Subpart G, Significant New Alternatives Policy Program. Federal Only - 40 CFR part 82

Compliance Requirements 10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)3. I) Any document (including reports) required to be submitted under this permit shall contain a certification signed by the responsible official. II) Upon presentation of credentials and other documents as may be required by law, the permittee shall allow authorized officials of the Missouri Department of Natural Resources, or their authorized agents, to perform the following (subject to the installation’s right to seek confidential treatment of information submitted to, or obtained by, the Air Pollution Control Program): A) Enter upon the premises where a permitted installation is located or an emissionsrelated activity is conducted, or where records must be kept under the conditions of this permit; B) Have access to and copy, at reasonable times, any records that must be kept under the conditions of this permit; C) Inspect, at reasonable times and using reasonable safety practices, any facilities, equipment (including monitoring and air pollution control equipment), practices, or operations regulated or required under this permit; and D) As authorized by the Missouri Air Conservation Law, Chapter 643, RSMo or the Act, sample or monitor, at reasonable times, substances or parameters for the purpose of assuring compliance with the terms of this permit, and all applicable requirements as outlined in this permit. III) All progress reports required under an applicable schedule of compliance shall be submitted semiannually (or more frequently if specified in the applicable requirement). These progress reports shall contain the following: A) Dates for achieving the activities, milestones or compliance required in the schedule of compliance, and dates when these activities, milestones or compliance were achieved, and B) An explanation of why any dates in the schedule of compliance were not or will not be met, and any preventative or corrective measures adopted.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 137 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

IV) The permittee shall submit an annual certification that it is in compliance with all of the federally enforceable terms and conditions contained in this permit, including emissions limitations, standards, or work practices. These certifications shall be submitted annually unless the applicable requirement specifies more frequent submission. The compliance certification shall include the following: A) The identification of each term or condition of the permit that is the basis of the certification, B) The current compliance status, as shown by monitoring data and other information reasonably available to the installation, C) Whether compliance was continuous or intermittent, D) The method(s) used for determining the compliance status of the installation, both currently and over the reporting period, and E) Such other facts as the Air Pollution Control Program will require in order to determine the compliance status of this installation.

Permit Shield 10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)6. I) Compliance with the conditions of this permit shall be deemed compliance with all applicable requirements as of the date that this permit is issued, provided that: A) The applicable requirements are included and specifically identified in this permit; or B) The permitting authority, in acting on the permit revision or permit application, determines in writing that other requirements, as specifically identified in the permit, are not applicable to the installation, and this permit expressly includes that determination or a concise summary of it. II) Be aware that there are exceptions to this permit protection. The permit shield does not affect the following: A) The provisions of section 303 of the Act or section 643.090, RSMo concerning emergency orders, B) Liability for any violation of an applicable requirement which occurred prior to, or was existing at, the time of permit issuance, C) The applicable requirements of the acid rain program, D) The administrator's authority to obtain information, or E) Any other permit or extra-permit provisions, terms or conditions expressly excluded from the permit shield provisions.

Emergency Provisions 10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)7. I) An emergency or upset as defined in 10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)7. shall constitute an affirmative defense to an enforcement action brought for noncompliance with technology-based emissions limitations. To establish an emergency- or upset-based defense, you must demonstrate, through properly signed, contemporaneous operating logs or other relevant evidence, the following: A) That an emergency or upset occurred and that you can identify the source of the emergency or upset, B) That the installation was being operated properly, C) That you took all reasonable steps to minimize emissions that exceeded technologybased emissions limitations or requirements in this permit, and

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 138 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

D) That you submitted notice of the emergency to the Air Pollution Control Program within two (2) working days of the time when emission limitations were exceeded due to the emergency. This notice must contain a description of the emergency, any steps taken to mitigate emissions, and any corrective actions taken. II) Be aware that an emergency or upset shall not include noncompliance caused by improperly designed equipment, lack of preventative maintenance, careless or improper operation, or operator error.

Operational Flexibility 10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)8. An installation that has been issued a Part 70 operating permit is not required to apply for or obtain a permit revision in order to make any of the changes to the permitted installation described below if the changes are not Title I modifications, the changes do not cause emissions to exceed emissions allowable under the permit, and the changes do not result in the emission of any air contaminant not previously emitted. The permittee shall notify the Air Pollution Control Program and the Administrator at least seven (7) days in advance of these changes, except as allowed for emergency or upset conditions. Emissions allowable under the permit means a federally enforceable permit term or condition determined at issuance to be required by an applicable requirement that established an emissions limit (including a work practice standard) or a federally enforceable emissions cap that the source has assumed to avoid an applicable requirement to which the source would otherwise be subject. I) Section 502(b)(10) changes. Changes that, under section 502(b)(10) of the Act, contravene an express permit term may be made without a permit revision, except for changes that would violate applicable requirements of the Act or contravene federally enforceable monitoring (including test methods), record keeping, reporting or compliance requirements of the permit. A) Before making a change under this provision, The permittee shall provide advance written notice to the Air Pollution Control Program and to the Administrator, describing the changes to be made, the date on which the change will occur, and any changes in emission and any permit terms and conditions that are affected. The permittee shall maintain a copy of the notice with the permit, and this agency shall place a copy with the permit in the public file. Written notice shall be provided to the administrator and this agency at least seven (7) days before the change is to be made. If less than seven (7) days notice is provided because of a need to respond more quickly to these unanticipated conditions, The permittee shall provide notice to the administrator and the permitting authority as soon as possible after learning of the need to make the change. B) The permit shield shall not apply to these changes.

Off-Permit Changes 10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(C)9. I) Except as noted below, The permittee may make any change in its permitted operations, activities or emissions that is not addressed in, constrained by or prohibited by this permit without obtaining a permit revision. Insignificant activities listed in the application, but not otherwise addressed in or prohibited by this permit, shall not be considered to be constrained by this permit for purposes of the off-permit provisions of

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 139 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

this section. Off-permit changes shall be subject to the following requirements and restrictions: A) The change must meet all applicable requirements of the Act and may not violate any existing permit term or condition; The permittee may not change a permitted installation without a permit revision, if this change is subject to any requirements under Title IV of the Act or is a Title I modification; B) The permittee must provide written notice of the change to the permitting authority and to the administrator no later than the next annual emissions report. This notice shall not be required for changes that are insignificant activities under paragraph (6)(B)3. of this rule. This written notice shall describe each change, including the date, any change in emissions, pollutants emitted and any applicable requirement that would apply as a result of the change. C) The permittee shall keep a record describing all changes made at the installation that result in emissions of a regulated air pollutant subject to an applicable requirement and the emissions resulting from these changes; and D) The permit shield shall not apply to these changes.

Responsible Official 10 CSR 10-6.020(2)(R)12. The application utilized in the preparation of this was signed by Robert L. Camereer, Plant Manager. Lafarge Corporation has provided the MDNR with the appropriate supporting documentation in a letter dated May 16, 2000 designating Mr. Ronald A. Thorson, Plant Manager, to act as the “responsible official” in all matters pertaining to Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant. If this person terminates employment, or is reassigned different duties such that a different person becomes the responsible person to represent and bind the installation in environmental permitting affairs, the owner or operator of this air contaminant source shall notify the Director of the Air Pollution Control Program of the change. Said notification shall be in writing and shall be submitted within 30 days of the change. The notification shall include the name and title of the new person assigned by the source owner or operator to represent and bind the installation in environmental permitting affairs. All representations, agreement to terms and conditions and covenants made by the former responsible person that were used in the establishment of limiting permit conditions on this permit will continue to be binding on the installation until such time that a revision to this permit is obtained that would change said representations, agreements and covenants.

Statement of Basis 10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(E)1.C. This permit is accompanied by a statement setting forth the legal and factual basis for the draft permit conditions (including references to applicable statutory or regulatory provisions). This Statement of Basis, while referenced by the permit, is not an actual part of the permit.

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 140 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

Attachment A

Fugitive Emission Observations
Visible Emissions Abnormal Emissions Beyond Boundary Date Time No Yes Cause Corrective Action Initial

## Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant 141 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

Attachment B

Opacity Emission Observations
Visible Emissions Abnormal Emissions Date Time Emission Source Normal Less Than Greater Than Cause Corrective Action Signature

### Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant SB - 1 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014


# STATEMENT OF BASIS

Permit Reference Documents These documents were relied upon in the preparation of the operating permit. Because they are not incorporated by reference, they are not an official part of the operating permit.

1) Part 70 Operating Permit Application, received March 17, 1997; revised April 9, 1997; 2) 1998 Emissions Inventory Questionnaire, received April 1, 1999; and 3) U.S. EPA document AP-42, Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors ; Volume I, Stationary Point and Area Sources, Fifth Edition

Applicable Requirements Included in the Operating Permit but Not in the Application In the operating permit application, the installation indicated they were not subject to the following regulation(s). However, in the review of the application, the agency has determined that the installation is subject to the following regulation(s) for the reasons stated.

10 CSR 10-6.180, Measurement of Emissions of Air Contaminants
, This rule has been included in the operating permit in order to provide citing for the allowance of requests for emissions data results. On past forms issued by the Air Pollution Control Program, including the application for this permit, it was automatically marked as an administrative rule not required to be listed as an applicable requirement. It is no longer judged to be solely administrative and is, therefore, included in the operating permit.

10 CSR 10-6.260, Restriction of Emission of Sulfur Compounds This rule had not been created at the time of application; however, it has been determined to be applicable to the installation and, therefore, has been included in the operating permit.

Other Air Regulations Determined Not to Apply to the Operating Permit The Air Pollution Control Program (APCP) has determined the following requirements to not be applicable to this installation at this time for the reasons stated.

10 CSR 10-2.060, Restriction of Emissions of Visible Air Contaminants This rule was rescinded from the Missouri Air Rules and Regulations as of November 30, 1999, but is still in the State Implementation Plan (SIP). This regulation has been replaced by 10 CSR 10-6.220, Restriction of Emissions of Visible Air Contaminants. With the installation demonstrating compliance with 10 CSR 10- 6.220, they will also be demonstrating compliance with this rule. Therefore, this rule was not cited in the applicable requirement section of the operating permit.

10 CSR 10-6.240, Asbestos Abatement Projects – Registration, Notification and Performance Requirements. This rule has not been included in the operating permit because the rule was struck down in the Cole County Circuit court.

### Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant SB - 2 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

10 CSR 10-2.160 Restriction of Emissions of Sulfur Compounds Sources 10 CSR 10-2.200 Restriction of Emissions of Sulfur Compounds From Indirect Heating Sources. These rules have been rescinded from the SIP, and therefore have not been included in the operating permit. The sulfur regulations are covered under state regulation 10 CSR 10-6.260.

10 CSR 10-2.030, Restriction of Emission Particulate Matter From Industrial Processes In the operating permit application, the installation indicated that the grinding, crushing, and classifying operations (EU0010 through EU0070) at their rock quarry were subject to this regulation. According to 10 CSR 10-2.030(3)(D)1. this rule does not apply to the grinding, crushing and classifying operations at a rock quarry, therefore this rule is not included as an applicable requirement for EU0010 through EU0070.

10 CSR 10-2.040, Maximum Allowable Emission of Particulate Matter From Fuel Burning Equipment Used for Indirect Heating The installation has reported two (2) 1.33 MMBTU/hr natural gas steam boilers and several natural gas fired space heaters < 10 MMBTU/hr subject to this rule. However, the APCP would not consider these sources to be capable of exceeding the emission limitation (0.40 pounds of particulate matter per million BTU's of heat input) of this rule.

Construction Permit Revisions The following revisions were made to construction permits for this installation:

1) Construction Permit Number: 0891-005 This construction permit was superceded by Construction Permit Number: 0891-005A. Therefore, the requirements for this construction permit were not included in the operating permit.

2) Construction Permit Number 0897-019 This construction permit is for a new Portland cement manufacturing plant and an aggregate operation at Sugar Creek. At the time of this review the equipment that was authorized to be constructed has not been fully constructed nor operational, therefore, the requirements for this construction permit were not included in the operating permit.

NSPS Applicability 10 CSR 10-6.070, New Source Performance Regulations 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart F, Standards of Performance for Portland Cement Plants This standard is applicable to the following affected facilities in portland cement plants that commences construction or modification after August 17, 1971: Kiln, clinker cooler, raw mill system, finish mill system, raw mill dryer, raw material storage, clinker storage, finished product storage, conveyor transfer points, bagging and bulk loading and unloading systems.

### Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant SB - 3 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

According to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL, §63.1356 an exemption from new source performance standards is given. Any affected source subject to the provisions of 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL, is exempted from any otherwise applicable new source performance standard contained in 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart F, except for:

• Kilns and in-line kiln/raw mills, as applicable under 40 CFR 60.60(b), located at areas sources are subject to PM and opacity limits and associated reporting and record keeping, under 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart F.

• Greenfield raw material dryers, as applicable under 40 CFR 60.60(b) located at area sources are subject to opacity limits and associated reporting and record keeping under 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart F.

Since the installation is a major source according to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL, the installation is exempted from the new source performance standard contained in 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart F.

10 CSR 10-6.070, New Source Performance Regulations 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart O, Standards of Performance for Sewage Treatment Plants This standard is applicable to the following affected facilities that commence construction or modification after June 11, 1973: each incinerator that combusts wastes containing more than 10 percent sewage sludge (dry basis) produced by municipal sewage treatment plants, or each incinerator that charges more than 1000 kg (2205 lb) per day municipal sewage sludge (dry basis)

Lafarge operates 6,000 gallon per day sewage treatment plant (EP-0) at the Sugar Creek Plant. The plant operates 24 hours per day, 365 days per year. The sewage treatment plant was installed prior to 1973 and does not operate an incinerator to combust wastes. At the time of installation, NSPS was not applicable to these types of units. Therefore emissions from this source is not regulated by federal requirements. Similarly, emissions from this source are not regulated by state requirements.

10 CSR 10-6.070, New Source Performance Regulations 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Y, Standards of Performance for Coal Preparation Plants The coal unloading, conveying and crushing operations at this installation are not subject to the New Source Performance Standards Subpart Y. This subpart applies to coal preparation plants which were constructed at various times after October 24, 1974. The coal unloading, conveying and crushing equipment at this installation were constructed prior to October 24, 1974, so are not subject to this subpart.

10 CSR 10-6.070, New Source Performance Regulations 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart OOO, Standards of Performance for Nonmetallic Mineral Processing Plants This standard is applicable to the following affected facilities in fixed or portable notmetallic mineral processing plants that commences construction or modification after August 31, 1983: each crusher, grinding mill, screening operation, bucket elevator, belt conveyor, bagging operation, storage bin, enclosed truck or railcar loading station.

### Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant SB - 4 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

According to §60.670(b), “An affected facility that is subject to the provisions of subpart F or I or that follows in the plant process any facility subject to the provisions of subparts F or I of this part is not subject to the provisions of this subpart.” The quarry operations at Lafarge Corporation – Sugar Creek Plant are prior to any facility processes that are subject to the provisions of subparts F. However, the quarry operations were installed prior to August 31, 1983 and are not subject to this standard. Since the rest of installation is either subject to the provisions of subpart F or follows in the plant process a facility subject to the provision of subpart F, this requirement was not included in the operating permit.

MACT Applicability 10 CSR 10-6.075, Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart T, National Emission Standards for Halogenated Solvent CleaningThe provisions of this subpart apply to each individual batch vapor, in-line vapor, inline cold, and batch cold solvent cleaning machine that uses any solvent containing methylene chloride, perchloroethylene, trichloroethylene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, carbon tetrachloride or chloroform, or any combination of these halogenated HAP solvents, in a total concentration greater than 5 percent by weight, as a cleaning and/or drying agent. Wipe cleaning activities, such as using a rag containing halogenated solvent are not covered under the provisions of this subpart. Lafarge Corporation has 3 solvent degreasers that use 100% hydrotreated light petroleum distillates (CAS No. 64742-47-8), therefore the installation is not subject to this standard.

10 CSR 10-6.075, Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart DD, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations The provisions of this subpart do not apply to Lafarge Corporation – Sugar Creek Plant. The Sugar Creek Plant is not operated as a waste management operation that receives off-site material, regulated as a hazardous waste treatment, storage and disposal facility (TSDF) under 40 CFR Part 264. The installation does not utilizes hazardous waste fuels. Therefore, Lafarge Corporation is not subject to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart DD.

10 CSR 10-6.075, Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Hazardous Waste Combustors The provisions of this subpart apply to all hazardous waste combustors: hazardous waste incinerators, hazardous waste burning cement kilns and hazardous waste burning lightweight kilns, except as provided in the subpart: The installation does not utilize hazardous waste fuel: Therefore, Lafarge Corporation is not subject to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart EEE.

### Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant SB - 5 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

10 CSR 10-6.075, Maximum Achievable Control Technology Regulations 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart LLL, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants From the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry The provisions of this subpart apply to each new and existing portland cement plant that is a major or an area source. The affected sources subject to this regulation are:

• Each kiln and each in-line kiln/raw mill at any major or area source, including alkali bypasses, except for kilns and in-line kiln/raw mills that burn hazardous waste and are subject to and regulated under subpart EEE of this part;

• Each clinker cooler at any portland cement plant that is a major source;

• Each raw mill at any portland cement plant that is a major source;

• Each finish mill at any portland cement plant that is a major source;

• Each raw material dryer at any portland cement plant that is a major source and each greenfield raw material dryer at any portland cement plant that is a major or
area source;

• Each conveying system transfer point at any portland cement plant that is a major
source;

• Each bagging system at any portland cement plant that is a major source; and

• Each bulk loading or unloading system at any portland cement plant that is a major source; The installation is a major source of HAPs, and therefore the kiln, clinker cooler, raw mill, finish mill, raw material dryer, conveying system transfer points, bagging system and bulk loading /unloading systems are covered by the MACT. The two rotary kilns do not contain an in-line raw mill or an alkali bypass.

NESHAP Applicability 10 CSR 10-6.080, Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M, National Emission Standard for Asbestos The installation is subject to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M. The requirements of this rule have been summarized and listed in the operating permit.

Other Regulatory Determinations (1) 10 CSR 10-2.030, Restriction of Emission of Particulate Matter From Industrial Processes ,

EU0080 – Rock/Clay Silo (#3 belt unloading to silo) The particulate matter emission limit is 63.0 lbs/hr. This process is enclosed. The uncontrolled emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (300 Tons/Hr) and the AP-42 emission factor is as follows:

SCC PM-Uncontrolled Emission Factor (lb/ton) PM-Uncontrolled Emission Rate (lb/hr) 3-05-006-07 0.00085 0.26

The uncontrolled emission rate is approximately two hundred forty (240) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission

### Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant SB - 6 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0090 – Alternate Raw Material Silos (Transfer Points) The particulate matter emission limit is 30.51 lbs/hr. This process is equipped with a fabric filter. The emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (20 Tons/Hr) is as follows:

SCC PM-Controlled Emission Factor (lb/ton) PM-Controlled Emission Rate (lb/hr) 3-05-006-12 0.000029 0.001

The control efficiency of the fabric filter is 99.35%, according to the installation. Based on a control efficiency of 99.35%, the uncontrolled emission rate is 0.001 lbs/hr. The uncontrolled emission rate is much lower than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0100 – Mill Scale & Gypsum Unloading Station Iron mill scale and gypsum are unloaded t a hopper before being processed to their storage silos. Fugitive PM emissions result from unloading the materials to the hopper. Therefore EU0100 is not subject to 10 CSR 10-2.030.

EU0110 – Mill Scale Silo (conveyor transfer point) The particulate matter emission limit is 30.51 lbs/hr. This process is enclosed. The uncontrolled emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (20 Tons/Hr) and the AP-42 emission factor is as follows:

SCC PM-Uncontrolled Emission Factor (lb/ton) PM-Uncontrolled Emission Rate (lb/hr) 3-05-006-07 0.00085 0.017

The uncontrolled emission rate is much lower than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0120 – Alternate Raw Materuial Transfer StationThe particulate matter emission limit for catalyst transfer is 1.25 lbs/hr and nonhazardous waste is 12.63. This process is equipped with fabric filter. The controlled emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (0.17 Tons/Hr for catalyst and 5.38 Tons/Hr for non-hazardous waste) and the FIRE emission factor is as follows:

SCC PM-Controlled Emission Factor (lb/ton) PM-Controlled Emission Rate (lb/hr) 3-05-006-07 2.900E-5 4.930E-6 (Catalyst) 1.554E-4 (Non-Hazardous Waste)

### Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant SB - 7 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

The uncontrolled emission rates (4.96E-6 & 1.56E-4) are much lower than the allowable emission rates. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rates will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0130 – Mill Feed Silo Building The particulate matter emission limit is 54.72 lbs/hr. This process is enclosed. The uncontrolled emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (140 Tons/Hr) and the AP-42 emission factor is as follows:

SCC PM-Uncontrolled Emission Factor (lb/ton) PM-Uncontrolled Emission Rate (lb/hr) 3-05-006-07 0.00085 0.012

The uncontrolled emission rate is much lower than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0140 - Raw Mill #1 Conveyor (to feed belt) EU0150 - Raw Mill #1 Feed Belt EU0160 – Raw Mill #1 Weigh Hopper EU0170 – Raw Mill #1 Grinder EU0180 – Raw Mill #1 Air Separator EU0190 – Raw Mill #1 - Unloading (airslide to raw mix pumps) EU0200 – Raw Mill #1 Dryer The particulate matter emission limit is 47.77 lbs/hr. This process is equipped with fabric filter. The emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (70 Tons/Hr) and the AP-42/FIRE emission factor is as follows:

PM-Emission Rate (lb/hr)

Emission Unit SCC PM-Controlled Emission Factor (lb/ton) Controlled Uncontrolled EU0140 3-05-006-07 8.50E-4 4.0E-4 0.08 EU0150 3-05-006-24 3.01E-3 0.22 33.38 EU0160 3-05-006-25 1.9E-2 1.33 204.62 EU0170 3-05-006-13 1.2E-2 0.84 129.23 EU0180 3-05-006-26 3.2E-2 2.24 344.62 EU0190 3-05-006-07 0.21 (Uncontrolled) 0.96 14.7 EU0200 3-05-006-13 1.2E-2 0.84 129.23

At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rate from EU0180 which is the highest is approximately seven (7) times greater than the allowable emission rate. The controlled emission rate is approximately twenty-one (21) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded with the control device operating. Control device #CD12 is used to control emissions from EU0140 through EU0200. Monitoring and record keeping will be required to ensure that the control device is operating properly.

### Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant SB - 8 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

The uncontrolled emission rate is much lower than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0210 - Raw Mill #2 Conveyor (to feed belt) EU0220 - Raw Mill #2 Feed Belt EU0230 – Raw Mill #2 Weigh Hopper EU0240 – Raw Mill #2 Grinder EU0250 – Raw Mill #2 Air Separator EU0260 – Raw Mill #2 – Unloading (airslide to raw mix pumps) EU0270 – Raw Mill #2 Dryer The particulate matter emission limit is 47.77 lbs/hr. This process is equipped with fabric filter. The emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (70 Tons/Hr) and the AP-42/FIRE emission factor is as follows:

PM-Emission Rate (lb/hr)

Emission Unit SCC PM-Controlled Emission Factor (lb/ton) Controlled Uncontrolled EU0210 3-05-006-07 8.50E-4 4.0E-4 0.08 EU0220 3-05-006-24 3.01E-3 0.22 33.38 EU0230 3-05-006-25 1.9E-2 1.33 204.62 EU0240 3-05-006-13 1.2E-2 0.84 129.23 EU0250 3-05-006-26 3.2E-2 2.24 344.62 EU0260 3-05-006-07 0.21 (Uncontrolled) 0.96 14.7 EU0270 3-05-006-13 1.2E-2 0.84 129.23

At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rate from EU0250 which is the highest is approximately seven (7) times greater than the allowable emission rate. The controlled emission rate is approximately twenty-one (21) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded with the control device operating. Control device #CD13 is used to control emissions from EU0210 through EU0270. Monitoring and record keeping will be required to ensure that the control device is operating properly.

EU0280 – Blend Silos (Raw Mix Unloading to Blend Silos) The particulate matter emission limit is 54.725 lbs/hr. This process is equipped with fabric filter. The emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (140 Tons/Hr) and the FIRE emission factor is as follows:

PM-Emission Rate (lb/hr)

SCC PM-Controlled Emission Factor (lb/ton) Controlled Uncontrolled 3-05-006-12 2.90E-5 0.004 0.62

The uncontrolled emission rate is much lower than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

### Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant SB - 9 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

EU0290 – Blend Conveyor (Raw Mix Transfer to Kiln Feed Leveling Box) The particulate matter emission limit is 52.84 lbs/hr. This process is equipped with fabric filter. The emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (116.67 Tons/Hr) and the FIRE emission factor is as follows:

PM-Emission Rate (lb/hr)

SCC PM-Controlled Emission Factor (lb/ton) Controlled Uncontrolled 3-05-006-12 2.90E-5 0.003 0.52

The uncontrolled emission rate is much lower than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0300 – Blend Conveyor (Raw Mix Unloading to Kiln Feed Leveling Box) The particulate matter emission limit is 52.84 lbs/hr. This process is equipped with fabric filter. The emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (116.67 Tons/Hr) and the FIRE emission factor is as follows:

PM-Emission Rate (lb/hr)

SCC PM-Controlled Emission Factor (lb/ton) Controlled Uncontrolled 3-05-006-12 2.90E-5 0.003 0.52

The uncontrolled emission rate is much lower than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0350 – Coal Silos (Coal Unloading from Conveyor to Silos) EU0360 – Coke/NH Waster Fuel Substitute Silos (Unloading from Conveyor to Silos) The particulate matter emission limit is 42.53 lbs/hr. This process is enclosed. The uncontrolled emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (40 Tons/Hr) and the FIRE emission factor is as follows:

SCC PM-Uncontrolled Emission Factor (lb/ton) PM-Uncontrolled Emission Rate (lb/hr) 3-05-006-07 0.21 8.4

The uncontrolled emission rate is much lower than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0370 – Rotary Kiln #1 EU0380 – Rotary Kiln #2 The particulate matter emission limit is 42.03 lbs/hr. This process is enclosed. The uncontrolled emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (37.88 Tons/Hr) and the Test emission factor is as follows:

### Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant SB - 10 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

PM-Emission Rate (lb/hr) SCC PM-Controlled Emission Factor (lb/ton) Controlled Uncontrolled 3-05-006-06 108.01 28.51 4090.70

At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rate is approximately ninety-seven (97) times greater than the allowable emission rate. The controlled emission rate is approximately one and one half (11⁄2) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded with the control device operating. Monitoring and record keeping will be required to ensure that the control device is operating properly.

EU0390 – Clinker Cooler #1 EU0400 – Clinker Cooler #2 The particulate matter emission limit is 42.38 lbs/hr. This process is enclosed. The uncontrolled emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (39.375 Tons/Hr) and the FIRE emission factor is as follows:

PM-Emission Rate (lb/hr)

SCC PM-Controlled Emission Factor (lb/ton) Controlled Uncontrolled 3-05-006-14 9.20 3.12 362.25

At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rate is approximately eight (8) times greater than the allowable emission rate. The controlled emission rate is approximately fourteen (14) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded with the control device operating. Monitoring and record keeping will be required to ensure that the control device is operating properly.

EU0410 – Clinker Roll Crusher The particulate matter emission limit is 48.43 lbs/hr. This process is equipped with fabric filter. The emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (75 Tons/Hr) and the FIRE emission factor is as follows:

SCC PM-Uncontrolled Emission Factor (lb/ton) PM-Uncontrolled Emission Rate (lb/hr) 3-05-006-11 0.17 12.60

The uncontrolled emission rate is much lower than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0420 – Clinker Reclaim & Transfer Station (Unloading mine or purchase clinker to silos) The particulate matter emission limit is 42.97 lbs/hr. This process is equipped with fabric filter. The emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (42 Tons/Hr) and the AP-42 emission factor is as follows:

### Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant SB - 11 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

SCC PM-Uncontrolled Emission Factor (lb/ton) PM-Uncontrolled Emission Rate (lb/hr) 3-05-006-16 0.16 6.79

The uncontrolled emission rate is much lower than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0430 – Clinker Transfer from Roll Crusher to Silos (#7 Belt) The particulate matter emission limit is 48.43 lbs/hr. This process is equipped with fabric filter. The emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (75 Tons/Hr) and the AP-42 emission factor is as follows:

SCC PM-Uncontrolled Emission Factor (lb/ton) PM-Uncontrolled Emission Rate (lb/hr) 3-05-006-16 0.16 12.13

The uncontrolled emission rate is much lower than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0440 – Clinker Silos – Unloading to Silos The particulate matter emission limit is 48.43 lbs/hr. This process is equipped with fabric filter. The emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (75 Tons/Hr) and the AP-42 emission factor is as follows:

SCC PM-Uncontrolled Emission Factor (lb/ton) PM-Uncontrolled Emission Rate (lb/hr) 3-05-006-16 0.16 12.13

The uncontrolled emission rate is much lower than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0450 – Clinker Loadout Station #1 (Clinker Unloading from Silos to Truck) EU0460 – Clinker Loadout Station #2 (Clinker Unloading from Silos to Truck) The particulate matter emission limit is 42.97 lbs/hr. This process is equipped with fabric filter. The emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (42 Tons/Hr) and the AP-42 emission factor is as follows:

SCC PM-Uncontrolled Emission Factor (lb/ton) PM-Uncontrolled Emission Rate (lb/hr) 3-05-006-16 0.16 6.79

### Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant SB - 12 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

The uncontrolled emission rate is much lower than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0470 – Gypsum Silos (Transfer Conveyor Unloading to Gypsum Silos) The particulate matter emission limit is 30.51 lbs/hr. This process is enclosed. The uncontrolled emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (20 Tons/Hr) and the AP-42 emission factor is as follows:

SCC PM-Uncontrolled Emission Factor (lb/ton) PM-Uncontrolled Emission Rate (lb/hr) 3-05-006-07 0.01 0.12

The uncontrolled emission rate is much lower than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0480 – Finish Mill #1 Feed Belt EU0490 – Finish Mill #1 Weigh Hopper EU0500 – Finish Mill #1 Grinder EU0510 – Finish Mill #1 Air Separator The particulate matter emission limit is 40.52 lbs/hr. This process is equipped with fabric filter. The emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (32 Tons/Hr) and the FIRE emission factor is as follows:

PM-Emission Rate (lb/hr)

Emission Unit SCC PM-Controlled Emission Factor (lb/ton) Controlled Uncontrolled EU0480 3-05-006-27 2.4E-3 0.077 11.82 EU0490 3-05-006-28 9.4E-3 0.301 46.28 EU0500 3-05-006-17 96 (Uncontrolled) 19.97 3072 EU0510 3-05-006-29 0.028 0.90 137.85

At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rates from EU0500 through EU0520 are greater than the allowable emission rate. The controlled emission rate of EU0510 which is the highest is approximately two (2) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded with the control device operating. Control device #CD34 is used to control emissions from EU0490 through EU0520. Monitoring and record keeping will be required to ensure that the control device is operating properly.

EU0520 – Finish Mill #2 Feed Belt EU0530 – Finish Mill #2 Weigh Hopper EU0550 – Finish Mill #2 Grinder EU0560 – Finish Mill #2 Air Separator The particulate matter emission limit is 41.57 lbs/hr. This process is equipped with fabric filter. The emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (36 Tons/Hr) and the FIRE emission factor is as follows:

### Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant SB - 13 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

PM-Emission Rate (lb/hr) Emission Unit SCC PM-Controlled Emission Factor (lb/ton) Controlled Uncontrolled EU0520 3-05-006-27 2.4E-3 0.086 13.29 EU0530 3-05-006-28 9.4E-3 0.338 52.06 EU0550 3-05-006-17 96 (Uncontrolled) 22.46 3456 EU0560 3-05-006-29 0.028 1.008 155.08

At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rates from EU0550 through EU0560 are greater than the allowable emission rate. The controlled emission rate of EU0550 which is the highest is approximately two (2) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded with the control device operating. Control device #CD35 is used to control emissions from EU0530 through EU0560. Monitoring and record keeping will be required to ensure that the control device is operating properly.

EU0540 – Finish Mill Fringe Tank The particulate matter emission limit is 51.07 lbs/hr. This process is equipped with fabric filter. The emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (98 Tons/Hr) and the FIRE emission factor is as follows:

SCC PM-Uncontrolled Emission Factor (lb/ton) PM-Uncontrolled Emission Rate (lb/hr) 3-05-011-07 0.24 23.52

The uncontrolled emission rate is approximately two (2) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0570 – Finish Mill #3 Feed Belt (Belt 12A) EU0580 – Finish Mill #3 Weigh Hopper EU0590 – Finish Mill #3 Grinder EU0600 – Finish Mill #3 Air Separator The particulate matter emission limit is 40.04 lbs/hr. This process is equipped with fabric filter. The emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (30 Tons/Hr) and the FIRE emission factor is as follows:

PM-Emission Rate (lb/hr)

Emission Unit SCC PM-Controlled Emission Factor (lb/ton) Controlled Uncontrolled EU0570 3-05-006-27 2.4E-3 0.072 11.08 EU0580 3-05-006-28 9.4E-3 0.282 43.38 EU0590 3-05-006-17 96 (Uncontrolled) 18.72 2880 EU0600 3-05-006-29 0.028 0.84 129.23

At the maximum hourly design rate, the uncontrolled emission rates from EU0580 through EU0600 are greater than the allowable emission rate. The controlled emission rate of EU0590 which is the highest is approximately two (2) times less than

### Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant SB - 14 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded with the control device operating. Control device #CD36 is used to control emissions from EU0570 through EU0600. Monitoring and record keeping will be required to ensure that the control device is operating properly.

EU00610 – Cement Storage Silos (Cement Transfer to Storage Silos) The particulate matter emission limit is 51.07 lbs/hr. This process is equipped with fabric filter. The emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (98 Tons/Hr) and the FIRE emission factor is as follows:

SCC PM-Uncontrolled Emission Factor (lb/ton) PM-Uncontrolled Emission Rate (lb/hr) 3-05-011-07 0.24 23.52

The uncontrolled emission rate is approximately two (2) times less than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0620 – Pneumatic Cement Conveyor #1 EU0630 - Pneumatic Cement Conveyor #2 The particulate matter emission limit is 44.39 lbs/hr. This process is equipped with fabric filter. The emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (49 Tons/Hr) and the FIRE emission factor is as follows:

PM-Emission Rate (lb/hr)

SCC PM-Controlled Emission Factor (lb/ton) Controlled Uncontrolled 3-05-006-12 2.90E-5 0.001 0.22

The uncontrolled emission rate is much lower than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements.

EU0640 – Cement Unloading Silos-Truck #1 EU0650 – Cement Unloading Silos-Truck #2 EU0660 – Barge Loadout Station EU0670 – Railcar Loadout Station EU0680 – Truck Loadout Station #1 EU0690 – Truck Loadout Station #2 The particulate matter emission limit is 44.39 lbs/hr. This process is equipped with fabric filter. The emission rate for this process based on the MHDR (49 Tons/Hr) and the FIRE emission factor is as follows:

Emission Unit SCC PM-Uncontrolled Emission Factor (lb/ton) PM-Uncontrolled Emission Rate (lb/hr) EU0640 3-05-011-07 0.24 11.76 EU0650 3-05-011-07 0.24 11.76

### Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant SB - 15 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

EU0660 3-05-006-19 0.42 20.58 EU0670 3-05-006-19 0.42 20.58 EU0680 3-05-006-19 0.42 20.58 EU0690 3-05-006-19 0.42 20.58

The uncontrolled emission rate is at least two (2) much less than the allowable emission rate. It is highly unlikely that the allowable emission rate will be exceeded, therefore there are no record keeping or monitoring requirements. (2) 10 CSR 10-6.260, Restriction of Emission of Sulfur Compounds EU0370 – Rotary Kiln #1 and EU0380 – Rotary Kiln #2 The installation has conducted emission monitoring on the ESP outlet of Kiln #2 from September 12 through September 27, 1995. The purpose of the testing was to determine the degree of variance in emission rates of NO x 

### , SO x 

### , CO, THC, CO 2 

### , and O 2 

### over an extended period of time. The kiln was operational for all days except on September 22 through 26 when an expected delay in kiln operation occurred. Monitoring results show that SO x 

### average emissions were 209.11 lbs/hr and average concentration of 296.58 ppm.

During the permit review ambient air quality modeling using Screen 3 model was conducted to determine the ambient air impacts of SO X 

### . The modeling (summarized below) predicted that the units would remain in compliance with the SO X 

### emission standards.

Averaging Time Total Ambient Impact NAAQS Standard Annual 8.38 μg/m 3 

### 80 μg/m 3 

### 24-Hour 44.86 μg/m 3 

### 365 μg/m 3 

### 3-Hour 94.23 μg/m 3 

### 1300 μg/m 3



### Therefore no monitoring or record keeping is required as the test and modelling results show that the SO x 

### concentration and ambient impact are well below the standards and the units will always be in compliance (3) Emission Units Without Limitation The sources listed as units without limitation are fugitive sources which do not emit regulated pollutants from a discrete stack or vent. These sources emit particulate matter and volatile organic compounds directly into the ambient air. These sources do not have any type of capture/control devices and are not covered or required to control their emissions based on any past or current regulations. These sources are not subject to any specific rule except the installation wide requirement of 10 CSR 10-6.170 and must comply with this requirement. (4) The following is the list of equipment which are identified as insignificant activities at the time of permit issuance. (5)
Description of Activity Activity Ref. #
1.33 MMBtu/hr each Natural Gas Fired Boiler EP-54 1.33 MMBtu/hr each Natural Gas Fired Boiler EP-55 Laboratory Fume Hoods and Vents EP-56 Twenty (20) 0.5 MMBtu/hr each Natural Gas Fired Space Heaters Plant

### Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant SB - 16 Project No. 

### 2240-0030-014

Other Regulations Not Cited in the Operating Permit or the Above Statement of Basis Any regulation which is not specifically listed in either the Operating Permit or in the above Statement of Basis does not appear, based on this review, to be an applicable requirement for this installation for one (1) or more of the following reasons: 1. The specific pollutant regulated by that rule is not emitted by the installation; 2. The installation is not in the source category regulated by that rule; 3. The installation is not in the county or specific area that is regulated under the authority of that rule; 4. The installation does not contain the type of emission unit which is regulated by that rule; 5. The rule is only for administrative purposes.

Should a later determination conclude that the installation is subject to one (1) or more of the regulations cited in this Statement of Basis or other regulations which were not cited, the installation shall determine and demonstrate, to the APCP's satisfaction, the installation's compliance with that regulation(s). If the installation is not in compliance with a regulation which was not previously cited, the installation shall submit to the APCP a schedule for achieving compliance for that regulation(s).

Prepared by:

Berhanu A. Getahun Environmental Engineer

### September 13, 2000
Lafarge Corporation 4000 Town Center, Suite 2000 Southfield, MI 48075
Re: Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant Sugar Creek, MO 64050, Jackson County Permit Number:

Dear Sir/Madam:
Enclosed with this letter is your operating permit. Please review this document carefully. Operation of your installation in accordance with the rules and regulations cited in this document is necessary for continued compliance.
If you have any questions or need additional information regarding this permit, please contact the Air Pollution Control Program (APCP) at (573) 751-4817, or you may write to the Department of Natural Resources, Air Pollution Control Program, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102.
Sincerely,

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAM

Randy Raymond Permit Section Chief

RR:bgb

Enclosures
c: US EPA Region VII Kansas City Regional Office PATs File: 2240-0030-014

### Steven J. Kidwell CERTIFIED MAIL: Z 321 860 047 Lafarge Corporation RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED 4201 North River Boulevard Sugar Creek, MO 64050

Re: Draft Title V Operating Permit – Project No.: 2240-0030-014
Dear Kidwell: The Air Pollution Control Program (APCP) has completed the preliminary review of your Title V permit application. A public notice will be placed in the Kansas City Star on April 16, 2000. The conditions and monitoring requirements of the draft permit are open for comment by the public and you until May 16, 2000. Standard permit wording (i.e. General Requirements) is not open for comment, since these provisions are required by law and regulation. The APCP will accept comments regarding the conditions and monitoring regulations that are postmarked on or before the closing date. Please address comments or recommendations for changes to my attention at: Operating Permits Unit Air Pollution Control Program P.O. Box 176 Jefferson City, MO 65102 A copy of this draft has also been sent to the U.S. EPA’s Region VII office in Kansas City for their review. The Region VII office is afforded, by law, oversight authority on any Title V permit which Missouri (or any of the other states in the region) may propose to issue. A public hearing may be held if sufficient interest is expressed by the public. Should you have any questions, or wish clarification on any items in this draft permit, please feel free to contact me at (573) 751-4817. Sincerely,
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAM

Berhanu A. Getahun Environmental Engineer
BAG/blw
Enclosures c: PATS File

## KANSAS

RE: Affected States Review – Notification of Proposed Final Part 70 Operating Permit Dear Mr. {Director’s Name}: In accordance with Missouri State Rule 10 CSR 10-6.065(6)(F)1. and the Clean Air Act this letter is to notify you of public notice of the preliminary draft and request for comments for: Lafarge Corporation - Sugar Creek Plant , Sugar Creek, MO 64050 Project Number - 2240-0030-014 Public notice will be published in the newspaper published in, city, on date. You are invited to submit any relevant information, materials, and views in support of or in opposition to the draft operating permits in writing by no later than date + 30 to my attention at Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Air Pollution Control Program, P.O. Box 176, Jefferson City, MO 65102. Should you require further information or documentation on this matter, please contact the Operating Permits Unit at (573) 751-4817. Thank you for your time and attention. Sincerely,

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAM

Randy Raymond Permit Section Chief

RDR:BAG ct first initial