alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Yardiablo Adams, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered January 25,1977, convicting the defendant after a jury trial of the crimes of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth and seventh degrees, unanimously reversed, in the interest of justice, and the matter remanded for a new trial. On September 17, 1974, two police officers responded to a radio call. Upon their arrival at the intersection of 123rd Street and Lenox Avenue, they were told by one Singleton that he had been assaulted by the defendant. Defendant had allegedly hit Singleton with a gun barrel. The officers were directed to the apartment on Lenox Avenue in which the defendant could be found. They were told by people in the apartment house that the defendant was on the roof. The defendant was arrested on a charge of assault, and in the course of a search conducted on the scene he was found in possession of 29 glassine envelopes containing a substance later determined to be heroin and a manila envelope later determined to contain marihuana. The items were found in defendant’s coat pocket. The defendant testified that he was the superintendent of the building in which he lived, and that when the officers found him on the roof he was sweeping the roof clean of narcotics after having chased junkies out of the building. He claimed the narcotics were not in his pocket but in a dustpan in open view. We must reverse the judgment of conviction in view of the error made during trial which rises to constitutional dimensions and may well have affected the result. During the course of cross-examination by the Assistant District Attorney, the following colloquy took place. "Q Mr. Adams, when the officer got on the roof with Mr. Singleton, did you tell him anything about the dope that you found? A I could not tell nobody that. I did not answer no questions, I told him until I have an attorney. I know this by me being there before. I know my little rights. I can protect myself. I did not tell no one. Everything he has. He will tell you about it. He is supposed to have it there too, sir. Q Well, didn’t you say anything to him about you just picked this thing off the roof? A He seen it in the dustpan, so why should I tell him that, sir. He has eyes. They don’t have no blind men on the police force, sir.” The cross-examination of the defendant as to his silence was improperly used against him to impeach his credibility, since it acted to penalize him for exercising his right to remain silent *(Doyle v Ohio,*426 US 610; *People v Conyers,*65 AD2d 437; *People vNolasco,*70 Ad2d 549). Concur—Birns, J. P., Fein, Lane, Markewich and Silverman, JJ.
EX-21
                          SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


                          SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

International Surfacing of Colorado, Inc., a Colorado corporation

                                        EX-99
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Synthetic Turf Corporation of
America ("Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
("Report"), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated
below, hereby certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to his knowledge:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.


Dated: June 10, 2003                   /s/  Gary Borglund
                                       Gary Borglund,
                                       President/Secretary/Treasurer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

STACEY LYNN SHANAHAN,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 4:20-cv-267-AW/MJF

WARDEN K. STRONG,

Respondent.

/

O R D E R

I have considered the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation dated 

September 10, 2020. (ECF No. 11). No objections have been filed. The Report and 

Recommendation is now adopted and incorporated by reference here. The clerk will 

enter a judgment that says “This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for 

Petitioner’s failure to pay the filing fee and failure to comply with three court 

orders.” The clerk will then close the file. 

SO ORDERED on October 13, 2020. 

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00267-AW-MJF Document 12 Filed 10/13/20 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION



<PAGE>


                                  Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of  Cereplast,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ending  September  30,  2005  (the
"Report") I, Frederic Scheer, Chief Executive Officer,  President, and Principal
Financial/Accounting  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18USC Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge and belief:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of the Company.


\s\ Frederic Scheer                                     Date:  November 15, 2005
-----------------------------------------------------
Frederic Scheer, Chief Executive Officer, President, and
Principal Financial/Accounting Officer

         This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ALEX MELENDEZ,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:20cv356-LC-HTC

OFFICER PRESLEY,

Defendant.

______________________/

ORDER

The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on November 5,

2020 (ECF No. 25). The parties were furnished a copy of the Report and

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title

28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined it

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 25) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

Case No. 3:20cv356-LC-HTC

Case 3:20-cv-00356-LC-HTC Document 26 Filed 12/07/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

2. Plaintiff’s claims for injunctive relief are dismissed.

DONE AND ORDERED this 7th day of December, 2020.

 s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No. 3:20cv356-LC-HTC

Case 3:20-cv-00356-LC-HTC Document 26 Filed 12/07/20 Page 2 of 2
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 4477** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. SHAWN OWEN GILLESPIE, II , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia , at Bluefield

. David A. Faber , Senior District Judge. ( 1:14

- cr - 00187

- 1 )

Submitted : December 15, 2016 Decided: December 19, 2016

Before SHEDD , DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Christian M. Capece, Federal Public Defender, Jonathan D. Byrne, Research & Writing Specialist, David R. Bungard, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. Carol A. Casto, United States Attorney, John L. File, Assistant United States Attorney, Beckley, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Shawn Owen Gillespie, II, appeals the district court’s judgment revoking his supervised release and sentencing hi m to 24 months’ imprisonment, the statutory maximum sentence. Gillespie argues that his sentence is plainly unreasonable because it is longer than necessary and does not adequately reflect his need for drug addiction treatment. Finding no reversible erro r, we affirm.

“ A district court has broad discretion when imposing a sentence upon revocation of supervised release. We will affirm a revocation sentence if it is within the statutory maximum and is not p lainly unreasonable.” United States v. Webb , 738 F .3d 638, 640 (4th Cir. 2013) (internal quotation marks omitted). “When reviewing whether a revocation sentence is plainly unreasonable, we must first determine whether it is unreasonable at all.” United States v. Thompson , 595 F.3d 544, 546 (4th Cir. 201 0). A sentence is substantively reasonable if the district court states a proper basis for concluding the defendant should receive the sentence imposed, up to the statutory maximum. United States v. Crudup , 461 F.3d 433, 440 (4th Cir. 2006)

. Applying the above standards to the facts of this case , we conclude that the district court’s stated reasons for imposing a statutory maximum sentence are not unreasonable , much less plainly so

. We therefore affirm the district court’s judgment

.3 We dispense with ora l argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), I, Tim Wan, hereby certify that, to my knowledge:



| | (i) | the Companys Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30, 2015 to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Apigee Corporation.
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: June 22, 2015



By:/s/ Tim WanTim WanChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


This certification accompanies the Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Apigee Corporation under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act (whether made before or after
the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ZOLTAN TAMAS,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 4:20cv188-MW/MAF

FIELD OFFICE DIRECTOR

for Miami Field Office,

U.S. Immigration and 

Customs Enforcement, 

and

WILLIAM P. BARR, in his

official capacity as United

States Attorney General,

Respondents.

_________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and 

Recommendation, ECF No. 20, and has also reviewed de novo Respondents’ 

Objections to Basis for Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 21, Petitioner’s 

Objections to Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 22, and Petitioner’s Response 

in Opposition to Respondents’ Objection. ECF No. 23.

Case 4:20-cv-00188-MW-MAF Document 24 Filed 08/17/20 Page 1 of 2
2

Accordingly

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted, over the objections

of both parties, as this Court’s opinion. Akinwale and Fahim are distinguishable. 

Petitioner “blocked” nothing. He merely availed himself of legal process. The Clerk 

shall enter judgment stating, “The petition is DENIED and the case dismissed.” 

The Clerk shall also close the file.

SO ORDERED on August 17, 2020.

s/Mark E. Walker 

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00188-MW-MAF Document 24 Filed 08/17/20 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ruths Chris Steak House, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 26, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Craig S. Miller, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



October 14, 2005



/s/ Craig S. MillerCraig S. MillerPresident and Chief Executive Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has
been provided to Ruths Chris Steak House, Inc. and will be retained by Ruths Chris Steak House, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

DARRELL A. JENKINS,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 5:20cv140-TKW-HTC 

SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

/

OR D E R

This case is before the Court based upon the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 5). No objections to the Report and Recommendation were 

filed. Upon due consideration of the Report and Recommendation and the case file, 

I agree with the magistrate judge’s determination that this case is due to be dismissed 

for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a Court order.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. This case is DISMISSED and the Clerk shall close the case file. 

Case 5:20-cv-00140-TKW-HTC Document 6 Filed 08/07/20 Page 1 of 2
2

DONE and ORDERED this 7th day of August, 2020.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:20-cv-00140-TKW-HTC Document 6 Filed 08/07/20 Page 2 of 2
§ 201.56-12 Miscellaneous plant families. Kinds of seed by family: Carrot family, Apiaceae (Umbelliferae)—carrot, celery, celeriac, dill, parsley, parsnip; Hemp family, Cannabaceae—hemp; Dichondra family, Dichondraceae—dichondra; Geranium family, Geraniaceae—alfilaria; Mint family, Lamiaceae (Labiatae)—sage, summer savory; benne family, Pedaliaceae—sesame; Rose family, Rosaceae—little burnet; Nightshade family, Solanaceae—eggplant, tomato, husk tomato, pepper, tobacco; and Valerian family, Valerianaceae—cornsalad. ( a ) General description. ( 1 ) Germination habit: Epigeal dicot.
( 2 ) Food reserves: Cotyledons; endosperm may or may not be present, depending on the kind.
( 3 ) Shoot system: The hypocotyl elongates, carrying the cotyledons above the soil surface. The epicotyl usually does not show any development within the test period.
( 4 ) Root system: A primary root; secondary roots may or may not develop within the test period, depending on the kind.
( b ) Abnormal seedling description. ( 1 ) Cotyledons: ( i ) Less than half of the original cotyledon tissue remaining attached.
( ii ) Less than half of the original cotyledon tissue free of necrosis or decay.
( 2 ) Epicotyl: ( i ) Missing. (May be assumed to be present if the cotyledons are intact.)
( ii ) [Reserved]
( 3 ) Hypocotyl: ( i ) Malformed, such as markedly shortened, curled, or thickened.
( ii ) Deep open cracks extending into the conducting tissue.
( iii ) Watery.
( 4 ) Root: ( i ) None.
( ii ) Missing or stubby primary root with weak secondary or adventitious roots.
( 5 ) Seedling: ( i ) One or more essential structures impaired as a result of decay from primary infection.
( ii ) Albino.
[59 FR 64506, Dec. 14, 1994]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### U.S. Customs and Border Protection

# AGENCY:

U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security.

# ACTION:

Notice of accreditation and approval of Intertek USA, Inc., as a commercial gauger and laboratory.

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13, Intertek USA, Inc., 481 A East Shore Parkway, New Haven, CT 06512, has been approved to gauge and accredited to test petroleum and petroleum products for customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory analyses and gauger services should request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is accredited or approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific test or gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquires regarding the specific test or gauger service this entity is accredited or approved to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to                         *cbp.labhq@dhs.gov.*                         Please reference the Web site listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories.                         *http://cbp.gov/​xp/​cgov/​import/​operations_​support/​labs_​scientific_​svcs/​commercial_​gaugers/​.*

# DATES:

The accreditation and approval of Intertek USA, Inc., as commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on May 04, 2010. The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for May 2013.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Anthony Malana, Laboratories and Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-1060.

Dated: November 8, 2010.

Ira S. Reese,

Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.

[FR Doc. 2010-29185 Filed 11-18-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
ALASKA SEAFOOD C B I R E P L AC E M E NT P A G E

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 2013

- 0652

DCN: 00 312 CBI

T H E FO LL OW ING H AS BEE N R E M O V E D BE CAUSE IT

C O N T AINS C O N F ID E N T IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA T I O N

(C B I) P E R 4 0 C F R P ART 2

, SU B P ART B

.
#### § 29.64 Authority of agent.

Proof of authority of any person making an application as agent may be required in the discretion of the official receiving the application.