alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Arlene Sullivan, Appellant, v Fred G. Buscaglia, as Commissioner of the Erie County Department of Social Services, et al., Respondents.

Judgment unanimously reversed, without costs, determination annulled, and matter remitted to respondent Blum for a fair hearing, in accordance with the following memorandum: This proceeding is brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul a determination of the respondent commissioner after a fair hearing which affirmed a determinaron of the local agency to reduce petitioner’s monthly assistance allowance (ADC) by $51.33 per month to recover excess educational grants totaling $462 above her family’s public assistance needs (see 18 NYCRR 352.16). The issue to be resolved is whether the educational institution’s schedule of $460 for "personal” expenses is properly educationally related and whether these moneys may be used for additional child care costs because of petitioner’s alleged need to study in the library at night because she cannot visit it during the day. A further consideration is the availability of this "personal” fund for additional clothing allowance. The proceedings at the fair hearing were preserved by an electronic tape recorder from which was prepared a typed transcript of the testimony at the hearing. A review of the transcript reveals numerous instances where the label "unintelligible” is used, especially in questions asked of petitioner, along with her answers. The decision after fair hearing, for example, disallowed the additional child care costs because "the evidence does not show that it (the library) cannot be visited during the daytime.” Actually, the transcript does not show any evidence at all. Neither is there anything in the transcript pertaining to additional clothing costs, nor is any mention of additional clothing costs made in the decision after fair hearing. What was asked or said about these expenses is a blank. The decision of respondent commissioner was made without the benefit of a verbatim transcript of the testimony before the hearing officer and therefore was not based upon a full record and must be reversed (18 NYCRR 358.18 [a]; *Matter of Robinson v Blum,*73 AD2d 691; *Matter of Gutierrez v Blum,*73 AD2d 690; *Matter of Anderson v Toia,*59 AD2d 1024). (Appeal from judgment of Erie Supreme Court—CPLR art 78.) Present— Simons, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Doerr and Moule, JJ.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

ANTWAUN V. LEE,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:20-cv-113-AW-GRJ

ALACHUA COUNTY SHERIFF’S 

OFFICE,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

I have considered the magistrate judge’s July 22, 2020 Report and 

Recommendation. ECF No. 8. No objections have been filed. I agree with the 

magistrate judge that the case should be dismissed. The Report and 

Recommendation (ECF No. 8) is adopted and incorporated into this order. The clerk 

will enter a judgment that says, “This case is dismissed without prejudice for failure 

to comply with a court order and failure to prosecute.” The clerk will then close the 

file.

SO ORDERED on August 24, 2020.

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-00113-AW-GRJ Document 9 Filed 08/24/20 Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Hank Williams, Appellant.

— Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered on February 9, 1979, unanimously affirmed. The case is remitted to the Supreme Court, Bronx County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). No opinion. Concur — Fein, J. P., Bloom, Silverman, Ross Appellant. Yesawich, JJ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 

v. Case No. 3:20cr35-TKW

PHILIP H. LY

______________________________/

ACCEPTANCE OF PLEA OF GUILTY

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate 

Judge, to which there have been no timely objections, the plea of guilty of the 

Defendant, PHILIP H. LY, to Counts One and Two of the indictment is hereby 

ACCEPTED. All parties shall appear before this Court for sentencing as 

directed.

DONE and ORDERED this 5th day of August, 2020. 

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cr-00035-TKW Document 122 Filed 08/05/20 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Bernard Chaus,
Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

o   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

o   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

September 27, 2002
                                            /s/ Barton Heminover
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Barton Heminover
                                            Chief Financial Officer
#### § 29.2521 Form.

The stage of preparation of tobacco such as unstemmed or stemmed.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Israel Gutierrez, Appellant. Gutierrez,

Appeal by defendant from three judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County, each rendered June 7, 1978, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree (two counts) and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences. Three judgments affirmed. We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious grounds which could be raised on this appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see *Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; cf. *People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Damiani, J. P., Gulotta, Martuscello and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          19,067                 144,871
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,682                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,025,026               3,067,820
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,342                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,021,684               3,067,820
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,025,026               3,067,820
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,549                 349,807
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                50,685                  61,090
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (46,136)                 288,717
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (46,136)                 288,717
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
          

</TABLE>
P.O. Box 301463 

Montgomery, Alabama 36 130- 1463 Dear Mr.Gore: 

Enclosed is the final end-of-year report for your agency's FY 2009 Air Pollution 

Control grant authorized by $105 of the Clean Air Act. This report outlines your 

agency's various grant commitments and their status. Since there were no issues, your 

report is now finalized and the grant has been closed out. This letter documents the 

conclusion of the joint evaluation process required by 40 Code of Federal Regulations 

35.1 15 and identified as a commitment in your FY 2009 Air Planning Agreement under 

Cross Cutting Issues. 

We appreciate the progress you made in FY 2009 and look forward to working 

with you in FY 2010 and future years to continue our joint efforts to protect and improve 

air quality. If you have any questions or comments, please contact me at (404) 562-9097 

or Marie Persinger at (404) 562-9048. 

Sincerely, 

r 

R. Douglas Neeley Chief Air Toxics and Monitoring Branch Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division 

Enclosure 

Internet Address (URL) http://www.epa.gov 

Recycied/Recyclabie .Printed wilh Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recyded Paper (Minimum 30% Postconsumer)
#### In the Matter of Investigation No. G-1 of the September 1977 Grand Jury of the Extraordinary Special and Trial Term. Three Certain Former Public Servants, Petitioners; Richard G. Denzer, Respondent.

— Application, pursuant to CPLR article 78, unanimously denied and the petition dismissed, without costs and without disbursements. No opinion. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Bloom, Silverman and Respondents. JJ.
- Contents
- Part 1. Video Exposure Monitoring Techniques
- Part 2. Case Studies
- Appendices
A. Program Listings
B. Bar Program Operating Instructions 

    - x: 1.2
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.24    
    


[SOBRATO
LETTERHEAD] 


FIFTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE  


        This fifth amendment to lease ("Fifth Amendment") is made this 3rd day of July, 2002 by and between Sobrato Interests, a California limited partnership
("Landlord") and Affymetrix, Inc., a California Corporation ("Tenant"), as successor lessee from Affymax Research Institute. 


WITNESSETH


        WHEREAS
Landlord and Tenant entered into a lease dated March 5, 1992 and subsequent lease amendments dated December 23, 1992, February 7, 1994, April 5, 1995
and June 12, 1996 (collectively the "Lease") for the premises ("Premises") located at 3380 Central Expressway, Santa Clara, California; and 



        WHEREAS
effective the date of this Fifth Amendment, Landlord and Tenant wish to modify the Lease to (i) change the Lease Expiration Date; (ii) specify the Base Monthly Rent
due for the period from September 1, 2003 through August 31, 2013; and (iii) modify the provisions of Lease section 28.A. and 28.B; 


        NOW,
THEREFORE, in order to effect the intent of the parties as set forth above and for good and valuable consideration exchanged between the parties, the Lease is amended as follows: 


	1.
	The
Lease Expiration Date is changed from August 31, 2003 to August 31, 2013.



	2.
	Base
Monthly Rent from September 1, 2003 through August 31, 2013 shall be:

$65,587.20 per month from September 1, 2003 through August 31, 2006;

$72,614.40 per month from September 1, 2006 through August 31, 2008;

$79,173.12 per month from September 1, 2008 through August 31, 2013.



	3.
	Lease
section 28.A. is modified to eliminate Landlord's right to terminate the

Lease in the event Tenant desires to assign or sublet the Premises or any part thereof.

Landlord's only options in such event shall be to permit such assignment or sublease, or

to refuse consent pursuant to the Lease.



	4.
	Lease
section 28.B. is modified to make the allocation of sublease and assignment profits an equal 50/50 split rather than the current 67% to Landlord and 33% to Tenant.



	5.
	All
defined terms shall have the same meanings as in the Lease, except as otherwise stated in this Fifth Amendment.



	6.
	Except
as hereby amended, the Lease and all of the terms, covenants and conditions thereof shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect. In the event of any conflict or
inconsistency between the terms and provisions of this Fifth Amendment and the terms and provisions of the Lease, the terms and provisions of this Fifth Amendment shall prevail. 



        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands to this Fifth Amendment as of the day and date first above written. 



	
Landlord	
 	

Tenant
	Sobrato Interests,	 	Affymetrix, Inc.,
	a California limited partnership	 	a California corporation
	

By:	
 	

/s/  JOHN M. SOBRATO      
	
 	

By:	
 	

/s/  BARBARA A. CAULFIELD      
 Barbara A. Caulfield
	

Its:	
 	

General Partner	
 	

Its:	
 	

Exec. V.P. and General Counsel













QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.24
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 The undersigned, John M. Fluke, Jr., the Interim Principal Executive Officer of CellCyte Genetics Corporation, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CellCyte Genetics Corporation, for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of CellCyte Genetics Corporation. Date: August 20, 2010. /s/ John M. Fluke, Jr.___John M. Fluke, Jr.Interim Principal Executive Officer __________     Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 The undersigned, Randy A. Lieber, the Principal Accounting Officer of CellCyte Genetics Corporation, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CellCyte Genetics Corporation, for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of CellCyte Genetics Corporation. Date: August 20, 2010. /s/ Randy A. Lieber___Randy A. LieberPrincipal Accounting Officer __________
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

 PENSACOLA DIVISION 

PATHONI A. BARRETT, 

Inmate No. B08822, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. Case No.: 3:19cv3556/RV/EMT 

WARDEN PORDIDUZ, et al., 

Defendants. 

____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge s 

Report and Recommendation dated January 15, 2020 (ECF No. 6). Plaintiff has 

been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and afforded an 

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 

636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. 

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined the 

Report and Recommendation should be adopted. 

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 

1. The chief magistrate judge s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this order. 

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to 

comply with an order of the court and failure to exhaust administrative 

remedies. 
Page 2 of 2

Case No.: 3:19cv3556/RV/EMT

3. The clerk is directed to close the file. 

4. All pending motions are denied as moot. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 18th day of February, 2020.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON 

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1

Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 8:46 AM

To: 'brian.dyer@remotepilotsystems.com'

Cc: Cooper, Thuy (FAA); Pappas, Rob (FAA); Schandler, Andrea (FAA); Pearson, Lakisha 

(FAA)

Subject: Request for Additional Information

March 4, 2015 

Mr. Brian Dyer 

Remote Pilot Systems LLC 

200 Barr Harbor Drive 

West Conshohocken, PA 19428 

Dear Mr. Dyer: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2014-1086). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your 

petition. 

 Your petition references the materials listed below, however the materials were not submitted for the 

record. Please provide a copy of the following referenced materials: 

o Aibot X-6 User Manual 

o Boyd Flight Operations Manual 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit 

any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e-mail to 

333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information 

described above by March 18, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without 

notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

Nia Daniels 

Program Analyst 

Nia Daniels, ARM‐108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075

nia.daniels@faa.gov
2
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. Case Nos.: 3:99cr46/RV 

 3:12cv261/RV/EMT

WILLIE JAMES GRIFFIN, JR.,

____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated June 13, 2012 (doc. 462). The parties have been furnished a copy of the

Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to

Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and

Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.

2. Defendant’s motion to vacate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (doc. 457), is DENIED

and DISMISSED.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 13th day of July, 2012.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER B. SMITH, et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. CASE NO. 4:03cv76-RH/WCS

CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC.,

Defendant.

_____________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This action arises from securities transactions effected by the defendant

brokerage firm on plaintiffs’ behalf. By order of July 18, 2003 (document 30),

this action was stayed pending arbitration. Arbitration proceedings have now

concluded. Upon consideration of the status report filed March 15, 2005

(document 38), and this court’s show cause order of April 1, 2005 (document 39),

to which no response has been filed, 

IT IS ORDERED:

This action is dismissed with prejudice. The clerk shall enter judgment 

Case 4:03-cv-00076-RH-WCS Document 40 Filed 05/09/05 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 4:03cv76-RH/WCS

accordingly and close the file.

SO ORDERED this 9th day of May, 2005.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

Chief United States District Judge 

Case 4:03-cv-00076-RH-WCS Document 40 Filed 05/09/05 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2608 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2608

                For the relief of Flavia Maboloc Cahoon.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 28, 2013

   Mrs. Davis of California introduced the following bill; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                For the relief of Flavia Maboloc Cahoon.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR FLAVIA MABOLOC CAHOON.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201, and section 245(d), of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Flavia 
Maboloc Cahoon shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or 
for adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for 
permanent residence upon filing an application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of 
status to lawful permanent resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--Notwithstanding subsection (d) of 
section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, if Flavia Maboloc 
Cahoon enters the United States before the filing deadline specified in 
subsection (c) of this Act, she shall be considered to have entered and 
remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for 
adjustment of status under such section 245 as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Flavia Maboloc Cahoon, the 
Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, 
during the current or next following fiscal year, the total number of 
immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the country of 
the alien's birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas 
that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's birth 
under section 202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Flavia 
Maboloc Cahoon shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded 
any right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality 
Act.
                                 <all>
```