alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Fairchild.Susan@epamail.epa.gov

Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 11:38 AM

To: Angus Crane

Thank you for the conversation this morning. Rick Marinshaw and Cindy Hancy at RTI have reviewed the 

status of the ICR data, and have found that certain information is missing. In summary of our 

conversation: 

MISSING TEST AND SURVEY DATA FROM WOOL FIBERGLASS: 

CertainTeed, Mountain Top, PA: we have no data for this facility-this facility is closed for at least 2-3 

years. FiberTEK, Nephi, UT: We have no data for this facility (Note: we do have some unlabeled CBI 

data from FiberTEK, but we believe that is for the Lakeland, FL, plant)-this facility has not yet started 

production. 

 

MISSING FINANCIAL DATA FROM WOOL FIBERGLASS: 

All plants for CertainTeed, FiberTEK, Johns Manville, Owens-Corning 

MISSING FINANCIAL DATA FROM MINERAL WOOL: 

Industrial Insulation Group, Rock Wool Manufacturing. 

In our conversation this morning, it was your understanding that the companies had sent forward to EPA 

the financial data requested in the ICR, and that you would follow up with these companies to find out 

what happened to the financial data, and would make certain that EPA receives the missing information. 

Thank you for tracking these down and ensuring that the information to support the RTR rule for these 

categories is sent forward to EPA. As always, if these data are being claimed as CBI, responders should 

clearly mark the disk and /or the materials with the words "Confidential Business Information" and send 

either via U.S. Postal Service Express Mail, registered mail, or private courier to: 

US Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

US EPA Mailroom (C-404-02) 

Attn: Mr Roberto Morales, DCO (Project 09-01) 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

Thank you for your attention to this matter, and please feel free to contact me at the following: 

Susan Fairchild 

Environmental Scientist 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

direct line: 919.541.5167 

fax: 919.541-3207 

email: fairchild.susan@epa.gov 

Overnight mail address: 

US EPA 

Mail Code D243-02 

109 TW Alexander Drive 

RTP, NC 27709
Docket Index for

EPA-R09-OAR-2015-0280

Section E:

Referenced Federal 

Register Notices

(Additional Documents)
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2459 

To reinstate overnight delivery standards for market-dominant products, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 20, 2013 

Ms. DELAURO (for herself, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. HIGGINS, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. 

MICHAUD, Mr. VARGAS, Ms. LEE of California, Ms. HAHN, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Ms. KAPTUR, Ms. TITUS, Ms. BROWN of Florida, Mr. KEATING, Mr. SIRES, Ms. 

ESTY, Mr. PASCRELL, Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania, Mr. ISRAEL, Mr. 

ELLISON, Mr. TONKO, Mr. BARBER, Mr. POCAN, Mr. WALZ, Mr. GRIMM, 

Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. BEN RAY LUJA ́N of New Mexico, Ms. SINEMA, 

Mr. ANDREWS, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. VELA, Mr. HUFFMAN, Mr. CONYERS, 

Ms. CLARKE, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. MCGOVERN, Ms. SHEA-PORTER, Mr. 

TAKANO, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mrs. DAVIS of California, Mr. RUSH, Ms. 

ESHOO, Mr. WELCH, Ms. SEWELL of Alabama, Ms. BASS, Ms. PINGREE

of Maine, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. NOLAN, Mr. 

CA ́RDENAS, Ms. CHU, Ms. SCHWARTZ, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. HASTINGS

of Florida, Mr. LEWIS, Mr. RUIZ, Mr. SERRANO, Mr. COURTNEY, Mr. 

ENGEL, Mr. LARSON of Connecticut, Mr. MEEKS, Mr. PETERSON, Ms. 

BONAMICI, and Mr. VEASEY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To reinstate overnight delivery standards for marketdominant products, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2459 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protect Overnight De3 livery Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. MARKET-DOMINANT PRODUCT SERVICE STAND5 ARDS. 

6 With respect to market-dominant products (as that 

7 term is described in subchapter I of chapter 36 of title 

8 39, United States Code)— 

9 (1) the service standards implemented by the 

10 United States Postal Service on July 1, 2012, are 

11 repealed and shall have no force or effect; and 

12 (2) the Postal Service shall reinstate the service 

13 standards that were in effect on December 31, 2011. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### LUCKEY v. MOCKRIDGE.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 8, 1906.)

Action by David B. Luckey against Grace A. Moekridge.

No opinion. Motion denied. Order filed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. Case No. 1:88cr1026-MW/GRJ-6

JOSE ELIAS SEPULVEDA,

Petitioner/Defendant.

_________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and 

Recommendation, ECF No. 3551, and has also reviewed de novo Petitioner’s

objections to the report and recommendation, ECF No. 3552. Accordingly

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted, over Petitioner’s 

objections, as this Court’s opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, 

“Petitioner’s Motion for Relief from Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 60(b)(6), ECF No. 3550, is SUMMARILY DISMISSED for lack of 

jurisdiction. In the alternative, the motion is DENIED as untimely. A Certificate of 

Appealability is DENIED.” The Clerk shall close the file. 

SO ORDERED on October 4, 2018.

s/ MARK E. WALKER

Chief United States District Judge
#### § 29.3651 Nondescript (N Group).

Extremely common tobacco which does not meet the minimum specifications or which exceeds the tolerance of the lower grade of any other group except Scrap.

| Grades | Grade names, minimum specifications, and tolerances |
| --- | --- |
| N1L | First Quality Light-colored Nondescript. |
| | Thin to medium body and 60 percent injury tolerance. |
| N2L | Second Quality Light-colored Nondescript. |
| | Thin to medium body and over 60 percent injury tolerance. |
| N1R | First Quality Dark-colored Nondescript. |
| | Thin to heavy body and 60 percent injury tolerance. |
| N2R | Second Quality Dark-colored Nondescript. |
| | Thin to heavy body and over 60 percent injury tolerance. |
| N1G | First Quality Crude Green Nondescript |
| | 60 percent crude leaves or injury tolerance. |
| N2G | Second Quality Crude Green Nondescript. |
| | Over 60 percent crude leaves or injury tolerance. |

[30 FR 9207, July 23, 1965, as amended at 49 FR 16759, Apr. 20, 1984]
§ 301.48 Notice of quarantine; quarantine restrictions on interstate movement of regulated articles. ( a ) Pursuant to the provisions of sections 411, 412, 414, 431, and 434 of the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7711, 7712, 7714, 7751, and 7754), the Secretary of Agriculture heretofore determined after public hearing to quarantine the States of Alabama, Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and the District of Columbia in order to prevent the spread of the Japanese beetle, a dangerous insect injurious to cultivated crops and not theretofore widely prevalent or distributed within or throughout the United States.
( b ) No person shall move any regulated article interstate from any regulated airport destined to any of the following States except in accordance with the conditions prescribed in this subpart: Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, and Washington.
[44 FR 24035, Apr. 24, 1979, as amended at 61 FR 32640, June 25, 1996; 66 FR 21050, Apr. 27, 2001; 68 FR 43614, July 24, 2003; 69 FR 40534, July 6, 2004; 71 FR 35493, June 21, 2006]
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2383 Received in Senate (RDS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2383

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 26, 2013

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the new Interstate Route 70 bridge over the Mississippi 
River connecting St. Louis, Missouri, and southwestern Illinois as the 
               ``Stan Musial Veterans Memorial Bridge''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STAN MUSIAL VETERANS MEMORIAL BRIDGE.

    (a) Designation.--The new Interstate Route 70 bridge over the 
Mississippi River that connects St. Louis, Missouri, to southwestern 
Illinois shall be known and designated as the ``Stan Musial Veterans 
Memorial Bridge''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the bridge referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Stan 
Musial Veterans Memorial Bridge''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 25, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### § 29.38 Public notice.

A proclamation by the Secretary under the Act (a) stating that an auction market is designated under the Act; (b) giving notice of such fact; (c) specifying a date when the requirement of inspection and certification under the act shall become effective; and (d) released to the press, mailed to the tobacco board of trade or warehouse association of such market, and mailed to the postmaster at such market for posting.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6173

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JEFFREY ROY CROSBY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District

Judge. (CR-96-361)

Submitted: March 24, 1998 Decided: April 24, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffrey Roy Crosby, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Chastain Wicker,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying Appellant's motion for release of exhibits. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no abuse of discretion.

See Shafer v. Preston Mem'l Hosp. Corp., 107 F.3d 274, 281-82 (4th

Cir. 1997). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order and

deny Appellant's motion to order the United States Attorney to permit forensic laboratory analysis. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Case 3:19-cv-03620-MCR-HTC Document 1-1 Filed 10/02/19 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 3:19-cv-03620-MCR-HTC Document 1-1 Filed 10/02/19 Page 2 of 2
§ 319.37-1 Notice of quarantine. ( a ) Under section 412(a) of the Plant Protection Act, the Secretary of Agriculture may prohibit or restrict the importation and entry of any plant or plant product if the Secretary determines that the prohibition or restriction is necessary to prevent the introduction into the United States or the dissemination within the United States of a plant pest or noxious weed.
( b ) The Secretary has determined that it is necessary to designate the importation of certain taxa of plants for planting as not authorized pending pest risk analysis, as provided in § 319.37-4. The Secretary has determined that it is necessary to restrict the importation into the United States of all other plants for planting and to impose additional restrictions on the importation of specific types of plants for planting, in accordance with this subpart and as described in the Plants for Planting Manual.
( c ) The importation of plants that are imported for processing or consumption, as determined by an inspector based on documentation accompanying the articles, is not subject to this subpart but may be subject to restrictions elsewhere in this part.
( d ) The importation of taxa of plants for planting that are listed in parts 360 and 361 of this chapter is subject to the restrictions in those parts.
( e ) The Plant Protection and Quarantine Programs also enforces regulations promulgated under the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544) which contain additional prohibitions and restrictions on importation into the United States of plants for planting subject to this subpart (see 50 CFR parts 17 and 23).
( f ) Within the Plants for Planting Manual, one or more common names of plants for planting may be given in parentheses after most scientific names (when common names are known) for the purpose of helping to identify the plants for planting represented by such scientific names; however, unless otherwise specified, a reference to a scientific name includes all plants for planting within the taxon represented by the scientific name regardless of whether the common name or names are as comprehensive in scope as the scientific name. When restrictions apply to the importation of a taxon of plants for planting for which there are taxonomic synonyms, those restrictions apply to the importation of all the synonyms of that taxon as well.
#### § 29.6001 Definitions.

As used in these standards, the words and phrases hereinafter defined shall have the indicated meanings so assigned.
MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSAL

98-1327.

#### In re Tolliver.

Union App. No. 14-98-21. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Union County. It appears from the records of this court that appellant has not filed a merit brief, due August 19, 1998, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed *sua sponte.*
#### § 29.2505 Class.

A major division of tobacco based on method of cure or principal usage.
#### § 29.2508 Color intensity.

The varying degree of saturation or chroma. Color intensity as applied to tobacco describes the strength or weakness of a specific color or hue. It is applicable to brown colors. (See chart, § 29.2601.)
#### § 3300.16 General.

Any public or private organization incorporated or chartered under the laws of, and with principal office in, the United States may apply to have one or more of its facilities in the United States designated as a U.S. ATP testing station.
# ADEQ

A R K A N S A S Department of Environmental Quality May 21,2012 Samuel Coleman, PE, Acting Regional Administrator (6RA) United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 

### 6 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 Dallas, TX 75202-2733 DearMr. Coleman: 

## 12 

## ttr,y 24 PM 5: 23

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed new source performance standards (NSPS) and emission guidelines (EG) for new and existing sewage sludge incineration (SSI) units. Arkansas hasrecently completed a thoroughreview ofemission sourceswithinthe State and has determined there are no new, modified or existing solid waste incinerators subject to the Sewage Sludge Incineratorsunit requirements under Section Ill, lll(d), or 129 ofthe CleanAir Act. A SSI unit is an incinerator or combustion device that is used to bum dewatered sewage sludge. SSI units are typically located at wastewater treatment facilities. The types ofincinerators subjectto the proposed standards are Multiple Hearth (MH) and Fluidized Bed (FB) Incinerators. Units incinerating sewage sludge at othertypes offacilities (e.g. commercial, industrial, and institutional) will be covered under different airpollution incineration standards. Based onnot finding any ofthese facilities, Arkansas is submitting the above negative declaration inplace ofa State plan. Sincerely,

# ~'- 

# MD---C_ Teresa Marks Director
cc: Mike Bates, AirDivision Chief- ADEQ Guy Donaldson, AirPlanning Section Chief- EPA

- Region 6

ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 5301 NORTHSHORE DRIVE I NORTH UTILE ROCK I ARKANSAS 72118-5317 /TELEPHONE 501-682-0744 I FAX 501-682-0880
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.9c


                                 THIRD AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                             STERLING CHEMICALS ESOP


                  WHEREAS, there is reserved to Sterling Chemicals, Inc.
("Chemicals") in Section 9.1 of the Sterling Chemicals ESOP (the "Plan") the
right to amend the Plan; and

                  WHEREAS, Sterling Fibers, Inc. ("Fibers"), a subsidiary of
Chemicals, has adopted the Plan for its eligible employees in conjunction with
the purchase of certain operations from Cytec Industries, Inc. and its
affiliates ("Cytec");

                  NOW, THEREFORE, Section 1.53 of the Plan is hereby amended
effective as of January 31, 1997 by adding thereto a new subparagraph (d) to
read as follows:

                  "(d) Each Cytec employee who became an employee of Fibers on
                  January 31, 1997 shall receive credit for his service that was
                  credited under the Cytec Savings and Profit Sharing Plan
                  ("Cytec Plan") on January 31, 1997 for vesting purposes under
                  the Plan."

                  All terms used herein that are defined in the Plan shall have
the same meanings given to such terms in the Plan, except as otherwise expressly
provided herein.

                  Except as amended and modified hereby, the Plan shall continue
in full force and effect and the Plan and this amendment shall be read, taken
and construed as one and the see instrument.

                  This amendment may be executed in several counterparts, each
of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which shall constitute but one
and the same instrument which may be evidenced by any one counterpart.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Chemicals has executed this instrument
effective for all purposes as of the date provided above.

                                       STERLING CHEMICALS, INC.


                                       By:
                                          ---------------------
#### § 29.3074 Unsound (U).

Damaged under 20 percent. (See Rule 21.)

[24 FR 8771, Oct. 29, 1959. Redesignated at 47 FR 51722, Nov. 17, 1982, 49 FR 16758, Apr. 20, 1984, and 51 FR 40407, Nov. 7, 1986]
#### § 30.20 Crude.

A subdegree of maturity, crude leaves usually have the general appearance of being raw and unfinished as a result of extreme immaturity. Crude tobacco ordinarily has a characteristic green color.
118 STAT. 1666 PUBLIC LAW 108–359—OCT. 25, 2004

Public Law 108–359

108th Congress

An Act

To amend the securities laws to permit church pension plans to be invested in

collective trusts.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONFORMING AMENDMENTS FOR CHURCH PLAN PARTICIPATION IN COLLECTIVE FUNDS.

(a) AMENDMENT TO THE INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940.—

Section 3(c)(11) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C.

80a-3(c)(11)) is amended by striking ‘‘such trusts or government

plans, or both’’ and inserting ‘‘one or more of such trusts, government plans, or church plans, companies or accounts that are

excluded from the definition of an investment company under paragraph (14) of this subsection’’.

(b) AMENDMENTS TO THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933.—Section

3(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77c(a)(2)) is

amended—

(1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of clause (B); and

(2) by striking ‘‘other than any plan described in clause

(A), (B), or (C)’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘or (D) a church

plan, company, or account that is excluded from the definition

of an investment company under section 3(c)(14) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, other than any plan described

in subparagraph (A), (B), (C), or (D)’’.

(c) AMENDMENTS TO THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.—

(1) Section 3(a)(12)(C) of the Securities Exchange Act of

1934 (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(12)(C)) is amended—

(A) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of clause (ii); and

(B) by inserting before ‘‘other than any plan described

in clause (i)’’ the following: ‘‘or (iv) a church plan, company,

or account that is excluded from the definition of an investment company under section 3(c)(14) of the Investment

Company Act of 1940,’’.

(2) Section 12(g)(2)(H) of the Securities Exchange Act of

1934 (15 U.S.C. 78l(g)(2)(H)) is amended—

(A) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of clause (i); and

(B) by inserting before the period at the end the following: ‘‘, or (iii) a church plan, company, or account that

is excluded from the definition of an investment company

Oct. 25, 2004

[H.R. 1533]

PUBLIC LAW 108–359—OCT. 25, 2004 118 STAT. 1667

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1533:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 108–248 (Comm. on Financial Services).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:

Vol. 149 (2003): Sept. 3, considered and passed House.

Vol. 150 (2004): Oct. 1, considered and passed Senate, amended.

Oct. 8, House concurred in Senate amendment.

Æ

under section 3(c)(14) of the Investment Company Act of

1940’’.

Approved October 25, 2004.