alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 3406

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3406 appear at 76 FR 4809, Jan. 27, 2011.

#### § 3406.23 Access to peer review information.

After final decisions have been announced, NIFA will, upon request, inform the principal investigator/project director of the reasons for its decision on a proposal. Verbatim copies of summary reviews, not including the identity of the peer reviewers, will be made available to the respective principal investigator/project directors upon specific request.
Page 1 of 2

Consolidated Case No. 4:20cv236-RH-MJF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

KIRK NIELSEN et al.,

Plaintiffs,

CONSOLIDATED

v. CASE NO. 4:20cv236-RH-MJF

RON DESANTIS et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________________________/

ORDER DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE

THE CLAIMS AGAINST THE GOVERNOR

The affected parties have entered into a stipulation for dismissal without 

prejudice of the claims against the Governor. ECF No. 198. This order dismisses 

those claims. This order does not change the case style, which will remain the 

same unless otherwise ordered. The case style will be changed if the Governor so 

moves. 

IT IS ORDERED:

1. All claims against the Governor are dismissed without prejudice. 

2. I do not direct the entry of judgment under Federal Rule of Civil 

Case 4:20-cv-00236-RH-MJF Document 215 Filed 06/10/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Consolidated Case No. 4:20cv236-RH-MJF

Procedure 54(b).

SO ORDERED on June 10, 2020.

s/Robert L. Hinkle

United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00236-RH-MJF Document 215 Filed 06/10/20 Page 2 of 2
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2530 

To improve transparency and efficiency with respect to audits and 

communications between taxpayers and the Internal Revenue Service. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 27, 2013 

Mr. ROSKAM introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To improve transparency and efficiency with respect to audits 

and communications between taxpayers and the Internal 

Revenue Service. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Taxpayer Trans5 parency and Efficient Audit Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEADLINE FOR RESPONSES TO TAXPAYER COR7 RESPONDENCE. 

8 Not later than 30 days after receiving any written 

9 correspondence from a taxpayer, the Internal Revenue 

10 Service shall provide a substantive written response. For 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2530 IH

1 purposes of the preceding sentence, an acknowledgment 

2 letter shall not be treated as a substantive response. 

3 SEC. 3. TAXPAYER NOTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURES BY IRS 

4 OF TAXPAYER INFORMATION. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after dis6 closing any taxpayer information to any agency or instru7 mentality of Federal, State, or local government, the In8 ternal Revenue Service shall provide a written notification 

9 to the taxpayer describing— 

10 (1) the information disclosed, 

11 (2) to whom it was disclosed, and 

12 (3) the date of disclosure. 

13 (b) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) shall not apply if 

14 the Secretary of the Treasury, or the Secretary’s designee, 

15 determines that such notification would be detrimental to 

16 an ongoing criminal investigation or pose a risk to na17 tional security. 

18 SEC. 4. DEADLINE FOR CONCLUSION OF AUDITS OF INDI19 VIDUAL TAXPAYERS. 

20 Any audit of a tax return of an individual by the In21 ternal Revenue Service shall be concluded not later than 

22 1 year after the date of the initiation of such audit and 

23 the Internal Revenue Service shall not assess any tax with 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2530 IH

1 respect to which such audit relates after the conclusion 

2 of such audit. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:99CR50/RV

ANTHONY DEXTER WILLIAMS

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Senior Judge Roger Vinson on October 1, 2008

Motion/Pleadings: Motion to Reduce Sentence and Supplemental Motion to Reduce Sentence

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (c)(2) 

Filed by Defendant on 3/31/2008 and

7/09/2008 

 Doc.# 185 and 189

RESPONSES:

 on Doc.# 

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

 Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

 s/Jerry Marbut

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Jerry Marbut

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 19th day of 

 June , 2009, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) See separate order (AO 247).

 /s/ Roger Vinson

ROGER VINSON

Senior United States District Judge

Case 3:99-cr-00050-RV-WCS Document 204 Filed 06/19/09 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change of the Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee (IACC) Subcommittee on Safety meeting on November 29, 2010, 9 a.m. to 12 p.m., at the Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Conference Room B1/B2, Rockville, MD 20852, which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on November 10, 2010, 75 FR 69091.                

The meeting will be a teleconference with no in-person meeting as originally advertised. The conference call will be open to the public and accessible through a conference call phone number. The call will be held from 10 a.m. to 12 p.m. The call is subject to change and could end earlier.

Dated: November 18, 2010.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-29616 Filed 11-23-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Jacob Mitagstein, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Greenblott, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed September 16, 1968, which found appellant ineligible for benefits on the ground that a valid original claim had not been filed because he did not have at least 20 weeks of covered employment in his base period (Labor Law, § 527, subd. 1, par. [d]). The sole issue on appeal is whether or not the record contains sub*585stantial evidence to support the finding that appellant had insufficient employment in his .base period to qualify for benefits. The board credited appellant with 17 weeks of employment during his base period. Appellant contends that he was employed for five additional weeks as an employee of one Robert Levy or a corporation in which Robert Levy was an officer. To support this contention, he produced two checks, made payable to his order and signed by Robert Levy. However, the evidence sustains the finding that these cheeks represented loans to appellant and did not constitute wages. This case presents no more than a question of fact solely within the province of the board, whose conclusion is supported by substantial evidence and must be affirmed *(Matter of Lieberman*[Catherwood], 28 A D 2d 1061; *Matter of Kelly*[Catherwood], 28 A D 2d 786). Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., Cooke and Greenblott, JJ., concur in memorandum by Greenblott, J.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2589 

To prohibit the Transportation Security Administration from performing security screening operations for surface transportation, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 28, 2013 

Mr. GARRETT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Transportation Security Administration from 

performing security screening operations for surface 

transportation, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Freedom of Travel Act 

5 of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON AUTHORITIES OF THE TRANSPOR7 TATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION. 

8 (a) PROHIBITION.—Notwithstanding any other provi9 sion of law, the Transportation Security Administration 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2589 IH

1 may not perform security screening operations other than 

2 pursuant to sections 44901 and 44935 of title 49, United 

3 States Code. 

4 (b) NULLIFICATION OF OTHER FEDERAL LAWS.— 

5 Any Act authorizing the Transportation Security Adminis6 tration to perform security screening operations not de7 scribed in subsection (a) shall have no force or effect. 

8 (c) VIPR TEAMS.—Section 1303 of Implementing 

9 Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007 (6 

10 U.S.C. 1112; Public Law 110–53), and the item relating 

11 to such section in the table of contents in section 1(b) of 

12 such Act, are repealed. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Selma Caston et al. v. Bilig Taxi, Inc. et al.

Motion granted to the extent of limiting the security to be posted by defendants-appellants to the *519Sum of $100,000, on condition that the appeal be perfected for the September 1969 Term of this court. Defendants may, in addition to compliance with CPLR 5519 (subd. [b]) by the St. Louis Fire & Marine Insurance Company with regard to the policy of insurance for coverage of $90,000, deposit the two medallions with the Hack Bureau of the Police Department, to constitute full compliance with the security requirement. Concur ■—■ Eager, J. P., McGivern, Markewieh, Nunez and Steuer, JJ.
98-1580.

#### Maple Hts. v. Spearman.

Cuyahoga App. No. 72988. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for stay,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for stay be, and hereby is, denied.
##### 



Exhibit 10.57 FIRST AMENDMENT TO
SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE (this Amendment), dated as of January 26,
2005, is entered into between Health Holdings & Botanicals, LLC (the Lender), and
NATURADE, INC., a Delaware corporation (the Borrower). RECITALS A. The Borrower and the Lender have entered into a SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE dated as of April 13,
2003 (the Loan Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein have the meanings given to them
in the Loan Agreement unless otherwise specified. B. The Borrower has requested that the Lender amend the payment provisions of the Loan Agreement. AMENDMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants herein contained, and
for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows: 1. Amendments to Loan Agreement.  a.
    Effective January 26, 2005 payments on the Loan Agreement will be
amended as follows:  i.
    On or before December 31, 2005 Borrower will
pay principal of $400,000 plus accrued interestii.
    No cash interest will be paid until principal
is paid in full.iii.
    Interest will be compounded on a quarterly
basis. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have entered into this Amendment as of the date first above
written.
 Naturade, Inc. /s/Stephen M. Kasprisin
Stephen M. Kasprisin
Chief Operating Officer Health Holdings & Botanicals, LLC /s/ Lionel Boissiere
By: Lionel Boissiere
Its: General Partner
§ 3430.1105 Funding restrictions. ( a ) *Construction.* Funds made available for grants under this subpart shall not be used for the construction of a new building or facility or the acquisition, expansion, remodeling, or alteration of an existing building or facility (including site grading and improvement, and architect fees).
( b ) *Indirect costs.* Subject to § 3430.54, indirect costs are allowable.
Editorial Note on Part 3400
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3400 appear at 76 FR 4806, Jan. 27, 2011.

§ 3400.1 Applicability of regulations. ( a ) The regulations of this part apply to special research grants awarded under the authority of subsection (c) of the Competitive, Special, and Facilities Research Grant Act, as amended (7 U.S.C. 450i (c)), to facilitate or expand promising breakthroughs in areas of the food and agricultural sciences of importance to the United States. Subparts A and B, excepting this section, apply only to special research grants awarded under subsection (c)(1)(A). Subpart C, Peer and Merit Review Arranged by Grantees, and Subpart D, Annual Reports, apply to all grants awarded under subsection (c).
( b ) Each year the Director of NIFA shall determine and announce through publication of a Notice in such publications as the Federal Register, professional trade journals, agency or program handbooks, the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance, or any other appropriate means, research program areas for which proposals will be solicited competitively, to the extent that funds are available.
( c ) The regulations of this part do not apply to research, extension or education grants awarded by the Department of Agriculture under any other authority.
[64 FR 34103, June 24, 1999]
§ 3011.2 Public inspection and copying. ( a ) *Background.* 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(2) requires each agency to maintain and make available for public inspection and copying certain kinds of records.
( b ) *Procedure.* To gain access to OFM records that are available for public inspection, contact the Freedom of Information Act Officer by writing to the address shown in § 3011.4(b) of this title.
##### 



Exhibit 10.62 FIRST AMENDMENT TO
SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE (this Amendment), dated as of January 26,
2005, is entered into between David A. Weil (the Lender), and NATURADE, INC., a Delaware
corporation (the Borrower). RECITALS A. The Borrower and the Lender have entered into a SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE dated as of May 3, 2004
(the Loan Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein have the meanings given to them in
the Loan Agreement unless otherwise specified. B. The Borrower has requested that the Lender amend the payment provisions of the Loan Agreement. AMENDMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants herein contained, and
for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows: 6. Amendments to Loan Agreement.  a.
    Effective January 26, 2005 payments on the Loan Agreement will be
amended as follows:  i.
    On or before December 31, 2005 Borrower will
pay principal of $25,000 plus accrued interestii.
    Cash interest of 6% will be paid quarterly with
the remaining interest is paid in full at termination of Note.iii.
    Accrued interest will be compounded on a
quarterly basis. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have entered into this Amendment as of the date first above
written.
 Naturade, Inc. /s/Stephen M. Kasprisin
Stephen M. Kasprisin
Chief Operating Officer David A. Weil /s/ David A. Weil
§ 3560.410 Consolidations. ( a ) *General.* With Agency approval, loans, loan agreements, or loan resolutions may be consolidated to reduce the administrative burden (*i.e.*, record keeping, budgeting), to improve the cost effectiveness and efficiencies of housing project operations, and to effectively utilize facilities common to housing projects.
( b ) *Loan consolidations.* Loan consolidations will only be considered when: ( 1 ) Multiple loans to the one borrower entity are being transferred to a different borrower entity in accordance with § 3560.406, or
( 2 ) One borrower entity has an initial loan and one or more subsequent loans for the same housing project and all the loans were closed on the same date and with the same rates and terms.
( c ) *Loan agreement or loan resolution consolidations.* Loan agreements or loan resolutions may be consolidated, even if the loans related to the agreement or resolution are not consolidated, to allow borrowers to comply with reporting, accounting, and other Agency requirements as a single housing project. ( 1 ) The loan agreements or loan resolutions may only be consolidated when they are related to loans made for the same purposes, to the same borrower, and operating under the same type of interest credit, if applicable.
( 2 ) All of a borrower's loan accounts must be current after the loan agreement or loan resolution consolidation is processed, unless otherwise approved by the Agency.
EXHIBIT 32

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of BlackRock Kelso Capital Corporation (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), James R. Maher, as Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and Frank D. Gordon, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                    |  |                        
|------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ James R. Maher 
|Name:               |  | James R. Maher         
|Title:              |  | Chief Executive Officer
|Date:               |  | August 4, 2011         
|                   
|/s/ Frank D. Gordon
|Name:               |  | Frank D. Gordon        
|Title:              |  | Chief Financial Officer
|Date:               |  | August 4, 2011
Editorial Note on Subchapter C of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter C appear by Amdt. 381, 65 FR 64586, Oct. 30, 2000.

§ 283.18 Motions and requests. ( a ) *Filing.* All motions and requests shall be filed with the Hearing Clerk, and served upon all the parties by the moving or requesting party, except motions and requests made on the record during the oral hearing. The ALJ assigned to the appeal or the Chief Judge shall rule upon all motions and requests filed or made prior to seeking review of the ALJ's initial decision pursuant to § 283.20, except motions directly relating to such review. Thereafter, the Judicial Officer shall rule on any motions and requests as well as the motions directly relating to the review of the ALJ's initial decision.
( b ) *Time for filing.* Any motion or request may be filed at any time, except that: ( 1 ) Motions to dismiss pursuant to § 283.5 must be filed within the time allowed for filing an answer; and
( 2 ) Motions for reconsideration must be filed within 30 days of service of the ALJ's initial decision pursuant to § 283.17(d).
( c ) *Contents.* All written motions and requests shall state the particular order, ruling, or action desired and the grounds therefor.
( d ) *Response to motions and requests.* Within 10 days after service of any written motion or request or within such shorter or longer period as may be fixed by the ALJ or Judicial Officer, an opposing party may file a response to the motion or request. The moving party shall have no right to reply to the response; however, the ALJ or Judicial Officer may order that a reply be filed.
( e ) *Certification to the Judicial Officer.* The submission or certification of any motion, request, objection, or other question to the Judicial Officer prior to the seeking of review pursuant to § 283.20 shall be made by and in the discretion of the ALJ. The ALJ may either rule upon or certify the motion, request, objection, or other question to the Judicial Officer, but not both.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Transnational Industries, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form  10-KSB/A-1  for the fiscal year ended ended January 31, 2004
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I, Jonathan A. Shaw,  President and Chief  Executive  Officer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.


/s/ Jonathan A. Shaw
--------------------
Jonathan A. Shaw
President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: May 21, 2004

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.