alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 29.1056 Slick.

A term used to denote tobacco having a close or tight leaf structure. Any leaf of lemon or orange color of which 20 percent or more of its surface is close or tight may be described as slick. (See Rule 17.)

[42 FR 21092, Apr. 25, 1977. Redesignated at 47 FR 51721, Nov. 17, 1982, 48 FR 29671, June 28, 1983, 49 FR 16756, Apr. 20, 1984, and 51 FR 25027, July 10, 1986]
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 224 (Monday, November 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 71134]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29362]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Initial Review 
Group, Subcommittee J--Population and Patient-Oriented Training.
    Date: February 24, 2011.
    Time: 7:45 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Westin Alexandria, 400 Courthouse Square, Alexandria, VA 
22314.
    Contact Person: ILDA M. Mckenna, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Research Training Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, 
National Cancer Institute, 6116 Executive Boulevard, Room 8111, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-7481, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#39545a525c57575850795458505517575051175e564f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="523f3139373c3c333b123f333b3e7c3c3b3a7c353d24">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 16, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-29362 Filed 11-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

May 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135922 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 135922 

 COA: 274714 

Wayne CC: 06-007908-01

TYRONE SELENA MOORE, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 22, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l0519 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 27, 2008 

 Clerk
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Section 906 Certification**

 

Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.Section 1350), the undersigned officer of Centennial Bank Holdings, Inc.(the “Company”) hereby certifies that the Company’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated: November 8, 2007

 
|   |                                                           |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                           |
|   | /s/   Paul  W. Taylor                           |
|   | Name:   Paul W. Taylor                          |
|   | Title:     *Chief Financial  Officer* |

 

Theforegoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) and is notbeing filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. 

 

----
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JONATHAN DANIELS,

Plaintiff, 

v. 4:20cv180–WS/MAF

MARK INCH and 

AARON DOUGHERTY,

Defendants.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF

No. 33) docketed June 29, 2021. The magistrate judge recommends that the

plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (ECF No. 32) be denied. Plaintiff has filed

no objections to the report and recommendation.

Upon review of the record, this court has determined that the report and

recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF No. 33) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order of the court.

Case 4:20-cv-00180-WS-MAF Document 36 Filed 08/16/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

2. The plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief (ECF No. 32) is DENIED.

3. The clerk shall refer the case to the magistrate judge for further

proceedings.

DONE AND ORDERED this 16th day of August , 2021.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:20-cv-00180-WS-MAF Document 36 Filed 08/16/21 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.2**Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302**I, Keith R. Schroeder, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Orchids Paper Products Company (the“Registrant”);2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) [reserved](c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: May 11, 2006 /s/ Keith R. Schroeder     Keith R. Schroeder  Chief Financial Officer
23
#### § 215.16 Suspension, termination and grant closeout procedures.

Whenever it is determined that a State agency has materially failed to comply with the provisions of this part, or with FNS guidelines and instructions, FNS may suspend or terminate the Program in whole, or in part, or take any other action as may be available and appropriate. A State agency may also terminate the Program by mutual agreement with FNS. FNS and the State agency shall comply with the provisions of 2 CFR part 200, subpart D and USDA implementing regulations 2 CFR subparts B and D and USDA implementing regulations 2 CFR part 400 and part 415, concerning grant suspension, termination and closeout procedures. Furthermore, the State agency, or FNSRO where applicable, shall apply these provisions to suspension or termination of the Program in School Food Authorities.

[Amdt. 30, 49 FR 18987, May 4, 1984, as amended at 71 FR 39517, July 13, 2006. Redesignated at 72 FR 61493, Oct. 31, 2007, as amended at 81 FR 66490, Sept. 28, 2016]
98-1403.

#### D & A Rofael Ent., Inc. v. Tracy.

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 96-J-1000. On motion to consolidate case with case No. 98-1404, *infra.*Motion granted.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 9, 2012 

# Order

April 9, 2012

143386(102)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, SC: 143386 v COA: 290336 Oakland CC: 2005-203484-FH JACOB TRAKHTENBERG, Defendant-Appellant.

___________________ _________________

On order of the Chief Jus tice, the motion by plaintiff-a ppellee for leave to file a brief 63 pages in length is c onsidered and it is granted.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2492 

To restrict funds related to escalating United States military involvement 

in Syria. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 25, 2013 

Mr. DESJARLAIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committees on Armed 

Services and Select Intelligence (Permanent Select), for a period to be 

subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 

of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To restrict funds related to escalating United States military 

involvement in Syria. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Americans 

5 from the Proliferation of Weapons to Terrorists Act of 

6 2013’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2492 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON FUNDS TO ESCALATE UNITED 

2 STATES MILITARY INVOLVEMENT IN SYRIA. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided under sub4 section (b), no funds made available to the Central Intel5 ligence Agency, the Department of Defense, or any other 

6 agency or entity of the United States involved in intel7 ligence activities may be obligated or expended for the pur8 pose of, or in a manner which would have the effect of, 

9 supporting, directly or indirectly, military or paramilitary 

10 operations in Syria by any nation, group, organization, 

11 movement, or individual. 

12 (b) EXCEPTION.—The prohibition under subsection 

13 (a) does not apply to funds obligated for non-lethal hu14 manitarian assistance for the Syrian people provided di15 rectly by the United States Government, through non16 governmental organizations and contractors, or through 

17 foreign governments. 

18 (c) DURATION OF PROHIBITION.—The prohibition 

19 under subsection (a) shall cease to apply only if a joint 

20 resolution approving assistance for military or para21 military operations in Syria is enacted. 

22 (d) QUARTERLY REPORTS.—Not later than 90 days 

23 after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 90 

24 days thereafter, the Secretary of State shall submit to 

25 Congress a report on assistance provided to groups, orga26 nizations, movements, and individuals in Syria. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2492 IH

1 (e) NON-LETHAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE DE2 FINED.—In this Act, the term ‘‘non-lethal humanitarian 

3 assistance’’ means humanitarian assistance that is not 

4 weapons, ammunition, or other equipment or material that 

5 is designed to inflict serious bodily harm or death. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Sharon Williamson, Respondent, v Carmen Shang, as Acting Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, Respondent, and Gabriel T. Russo, as Director of the Monroe County Department of Social Services, Appellant.

Appeal unanimously dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: We dismiss this appeal without prejudice to appellant Russo’s right to renew the application for reargument. Denial of a motion for leave to reargue is not appealable *(Matter of Hooker v Town Bd. of Town of Guilderland,*60 AD2d 684; *American Bank & Trust Co. v Lichtenstein,*48 AD2d 790, affd 39 NY2d 857; *Roberts v Connelly,*35 AD2d 813; *Matter of Bauer [MVAIC],*31 AD2d 239, 244). Although CPLR 2221 which deals with motions for leave to reargue contains no time limitations, it is well settled that a motion to reargue may not be used by a party to extend its time to appeal and such motion must be made before the expiration of the time in which to appeal from the determination of the original motion *(Matter of Huie [Furman],*20 NY2d 568; *Liberty Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v Bero Constr. Corp.,*29 AD2d 627). However, on this record there was a timely application made by a party. Since the parties before the court on the original proceeding had inseparable interests, it would not be contrary to CPLR 2221 for the court to entertain a motion to reargue. (Appeal from order of Monroe Supreme Court—art 78.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Callahan and Moule, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-1009
KAREN M. KINGSBURY MILLER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BREIT, DRESCHER & BREIT, P.C., Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Richard B. Kellam, Senior District Judge. (CA-93-1052) Submitted: November 21, 1995 Decided: March 26, 1996 Before HALL, WILKINS, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Karen M. Kingsbury Miller, Appellant Pro Se. Gregory Albert Giordano, SHUTTLEWORTH, RULOFF, GIORDANO & KAHLE, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying her action seeking monetary penalties under 29 U.S.C.A. § 1132(c)(1) (West Supp. 1995) for failure to timely notify her of her rights to continue her health insurance benefits, and denying her motion forcosts and attorney's fees. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Kingsbury Miller v. Breit, Dresher & Breit, P.C. , No. CA-93-1052 (E.D. Va. Nov. 25, 1994 & Jan. 30, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Anna L. Leff et al., Appellants, v Robert L. Soley, Respondent.

In a medical malpractice action, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered April 24, 1979, which denied their motion, *inter alia,*to set aside the jury verdict, which was against them and in favor of the defendant. We deem the notice of appeal to be a premature notice of appeal from the judgment which was entered on the verdict on July 18, 1979 (see CPLR 5520, subd [c]). Judgment affirmed, with costs. Under the circumstances of the instant case, the trial court properly refused to instruct the jury on the doctrine of *res ipsa loquitur*(see *Pipers v Rosenow,*39 AD2d 240, 243-245 [opn by Hopkins, J.]; see, also, *De Falco v Long Is. Coll. Hosp.,*90 Misc 2d 164, 168, affd 62 AD2d 1180). We have considered appellants’ remaining contentions and find them to be lacking in merit. Damiani, J. P., Gibbons, Gulotta and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
§ 28.480 General. ( a ) American Upland cotton which in color is within the range of the color standards established in this part shall be designated according to the color standard irrespective of the leaf content. American Upland cotton which in leaf is within the leaf standards established in this part shall be designated according to the leaf standard irrespective of the color.
( b ) The term preparation is used to describe the degree of smoothness or roughness with which cotton is ginned and the relative neppiness or nappiness of the ginned lint. Normal preparation for any color grade of American Upland cotton for which there is a physical color standard shall be that found in the physical color standard. Normal preparation for any color grade of American Upland cotton for which there is a descriptive color standard shall be that found in the physical standards for color used to define the descriptive color grade. Explanatory terms considered necessary to adequately describe the preparation of cotton may be entered on classification memorandums or certificates.
[57 FR 34499, Aug. 5, 1992]
§ 301.91 Quarantine and regulations; restrictions on interstate movement of regulated articles. ( a ) *Notice of quarantine.* Under the authority of sections 411, 412, 414, and 434 of the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7711, 7712, 7714, and 7754),1 the Secretary of Agriculture establishes a quarantine within the United States to prevent the artificial spread of European larch canker (*Lachnellula willkommi* (Dasycypha)). The regulations in this subpart govern the interstate movement from regulated areas of regulated articles.
( b ) *Restrictions on interstate movement of regulated articles.* No common carrier or other person shall move interstate from any regulated area any regulated article except in accordance with the conditions prescribed in this subpart.
[49 FR 18992, May 4, 1984, as amended at 66 FR 21053, Apr. 27, 2001; 87 FR 80017, Dec. 29, 2022]
§ 301.55-2 Regulated articles. ( a ) *List of regulated articles.* The Administrator has determined that certain articles present a risk of spreading the South American cactus moth. A list of all such regulated articles is found on the internet at *www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/planthealth/plant-pest-and-disease-programs/pests-and-diseases/sa_insects/south-american-cactus-moth .* Lists of all regulated articles may also be obtained by request from any local office of PPQ; local offices are listed in telephone directories and on the internet at *www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/planthealth/ppq-program-overview/sphd .*
( b ) *Normal process for designating additional regulated articles.* ( 1 ) If the Administrator determines that an article not already listed at *www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/planthealth/plant-pest-and-disease-programs/pests-and-diseases/sa_insects/south-american-cactus-moth* presents a risk of spreading South American cactus moth, APHIS will publish a notice in the Federal Register proposing to designate the article as a regulated article for South American cactus moth. The notice will provide the basis for this determination, and will request public comment.
( 2 ) If no comments are received on the notice, or if the comments do not change the Administrator's determination, APHIS will publish a second notice in the Federal Register designating the article as a regulated article for South American cactus moth and listing it.
( c ) *Immediate designation of regulated articles.* An inspector may designate any other product, article, or means of conveyance not listed at *www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/planthealth/plant-pest-and-disease-programs/pests-and-diseases/sa_insects/south-american-cactus-moth* as a regulated article if the inspector determines it presents a risk of spreading the South American cactus moth, after the inspector provides written notification to the person in possession of the product, article, or means of conveyance that it is subject to the restrictions of this subpart.
[87 FR 80007, Dec. 29, 2022]
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

In connection with the quarterly report of Holloman Energy Corporation, (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Grant Petersen, the Principal Executive and Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of            the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Date: | August 13, 2008 | /s/ Grant Petersen   |
|-------|-----------------|---------------------------|

|   | Grant Petersen, Principal Executive |
|--------|-------------------------------------|

|   | and Financial Officer |
|--------|-----------------------|