alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          15,703
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,326
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,683
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,482
<PP&E>                                         244,040
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 318,674
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,347
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               68
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,745
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   318,674
<SALES>                                         73,996
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                73,996
<CGS>                                           42,345
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   42,345
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,700
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,855
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,880
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,878
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,002
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,002
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.15
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with Genco Shipping & Trading Limited’s (the “Company”)quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),the undersigned President of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  May 10, 2010 | /s/ Robert Gerald  Buchanan   |
|--------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                     | Name:  Robert Gerald Buchanan |
|                     | Title:  President             |

 

Theforegoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosuredocument.  A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Companyand will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Nathan Spiegel, Appellant.

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered September 18, 1978, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, plea vacated and case remitted to Criminal Term for further proceedings consistent herewith. Under the circumstances of this case, the court should have granted defendant’s application to withdraw his guilty plea. Hopkins, J. P., Rabin, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 The undersigned, John M. Fluke, Jr., the Interim Principal Executive Officer of CellCyte Genetics Corporation, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CellCyte Genetics Corporation, for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of CellCyte Genetics Corporation. Date: May 16, 2011. /s/ John M. Fluke, Jr.___John M. Fluke, Jr.Interim Principal Executive Officer __________   Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 The undersigned, Randy A. Lieber, the Principal Accounting Officer of CellCyte Genetics Corporation, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CellCyte Genetics Corporation, for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of CellCyte Genetics Corporation. Date: May 16, 2011. /s/ Randy A. Lieber___Randy A. LieberPrincipal Accounting Officer __________
#### § 29.3114 Rule 11.

The use of any grade may be restricted by the Director during any marketing season, when it is found that the grade is not needed or appears in insufficient volume to justify its use.
#### In the Matter of Brenda Wise, Petitioner, v Barbara Blum, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, et al., Respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, dated May 1, 1978 and made after a statutory fair hearing, which affirmed a determination of the local agency to reduce petitioner’s public assistance grant for her failure to co-operate in a proceeding to establish the paternity of one of her children. Petition granted to the extent that the determination is annulled, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the respondent State commissioner for a new fair hearing in accordance herewith. The local agency reduced petitioner’s public assistance grant because she had failed to appear on three separate occasions in a proceeding brought on her behalf by the County of Suffolk to establish the paternity of her youngest child. These absences, unless satisfactorily explained, constituted a violation of Federal provisions (US Code, tit 42, § 602, subd [a], par [26]), which impose upon recipients of aid to dependent children the obligation to co-operate in efforts to establish the paternity of a child or children for whom such aid is claimed. At the fair hearing held on April 11, 1978, petitioner offered an explanation for her last failure to appear but the hearing officer failed to inquire concerning the first two absences, despite petitioner’s question as to whether she should explain her first absence. Under these circumstances, we cannot agree that the determination in issue is supported by substantial evidence and the matter must be remanded for a new hearing. Hopkins, J. P., Lazer, Gibbons and Rabin, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Form 10-Q of James River Group, Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2007, I, J. Adam Abram, President and Chief Executive Officer of James River Group, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

|   | (a) | such Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (b) | the information contained in such Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of James River Group, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of, and for, the periods presented in such Form 10-Q. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

| By:    | /s/ J. Adam Abram                     |   | Date:  April 30, 2007 |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------|
|   | J. Adam Abram                         |   |                  |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |   |                  |
#### § 29.3064 Sweated.

The condition of tobacco which has passed through one or more fermentations natural to tobacco packed with a normal percentage of moisture. This condition is sometimes described as aged.

[24 FR 8771, Oct. 29, 1959. Redesignated at 47 FR 51722, Nov. 17, 1982, and at 49 FR 16758, Apr. 20, 1984]
###### Editorial Note on Part 3404

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3404 appear at 76 FR 4808, Jan. 27, 2011.

#### § 3404.2 Public inspection, copying, and indexing.

5 U.S.C. 552(a)(2) requires that certain materials be made available for public inspection and copying and that a current index of these materials be published quarterly or otherwise be made available. Members of the public may request access to such materials maintained by NIFA at the following office: Information Staff, ARS, REE, USDA, Room 1-2248, Mail Stop 5128, 5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Beltsville, MD 20705-5128; Telephone (301) 504-1640 or (301) 504-1655; TTY-VOICE (301) 504-1743. Office hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Information maintained in our electronic reading room can be accessed at *http://www.ars.usda.gov/is/foia/#Electronic.*
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 99-51111 Summary Calendar

_____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus FAUSTO GUEVARRA-OSTIGUIN, also known as Fausto Guevarra, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-99-CR-710-ALL-DB

_________________________________________________________________ July 13, 2000 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The federal public defender appointed to represent Fausto Guevarra-Ostiguin has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Guevarra-Ostiguin has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief, but has not filed a response. Our independent review of the bri e f and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingl y, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,2

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
Editorial Note on Part 3401
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3401 appear at 76 FR 4806, Jan. 27, 2011.

§ 3401.1 Applicability of regulations of this part. ( a ) The regulations of this part apply to rangeland research grants awarded under the authority of section 1480 of the National Agricultural Research, Extension, and Teaching Policy Act of 1977, as amended (7 U.S.C. 3333) to land-grant colleges and universities, State agricultural experiment stations, and colleges, universities, and Federal laboratories having a demonstrable capacity in rangeland research, as determined by the Secretary, to carry out rangeland research. The Director of the National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) shall determine and announce, through publication each year of a Notice in the Federal Register, professional trade journals, agency or program handbooks, the catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance or any other appropriate means, research program areas for which proposals will be solicited, to the extent that funds are available.
( b ) The regulations of this part do not apply to research grants awarded by the Department of Agriculture under any other authority.
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Annual Report of AEI Real Estate Fund  XV
Limited  Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-KSB  for  the
period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on  the  date hereof  (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned, Robert P. Johnson, President of AEI Fund  Management
86-A, Inc., the Managing General Partner of the Partnership,  and
Patrick  W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management
86-A,  Inc., each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Partnership.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management 86-A, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              March 17, 2006



                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management 86-A, Inc.
                              Managing General Partner
                              March 17, 2006
#### In the Matter of Jeremy M. Jacobs et al., Respondents, v Board of Assessors of the Town of Elma et al., Appellants.

(Appeal No. 2.)

— Order unanimously modified and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: The first paragraph of the order properly denied the motion to delete from the judgment the award of an additional allowance. The next two ordering paragraphs of the order inconsistently granted an additional allowance in the same amount under CPLR 8303 (subd [a], par 2) but only in lieu of the allowance granted in the judgment. This being a tax assessment review case, the matter of an additional allowance is governed by section 722 of the Real Property Tax Law, and CPLR 8303 (subd [a], par 2) does not apply *(Matter of Rice v Srogi,*70 AD2d 764). The order is, therefore, modified by striking the last two ordering paragraphs. (Appeal from order of Erie Supreme Court — additional costs.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Cardamone, Simons, Doerr and Witmer, JJ.
# L_2020433EN.01003001.xml

| 22.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 433/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 433/30

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2020/2177

of 15 December 2020

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Haricot de Castelnaudary’ (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, France’s application to register the name ‘Haricot de Castelnaudary’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, France’s application to register the name ‘Haricot de Castelnaudary’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Haricot de Castelnaudary’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Haricot de Castelnaudary’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Haricot de Castelnaudary’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6 – Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the seventh day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 December 2020.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 281, 26.8.2020, p. 2.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
#### In the Matter of Sammy Thomas et al., Petitioners, v Ross Tisci, as Cayuga County District Attorney, et al., Respondents.

Petition unanimously denied without costs. *(Matter of State of New York v King,*36 NY2d 59, 62.) (Art 78.) Present— Dillon, P. J., Simons, Hancock, Jr., Callahan and Witmer, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 71418]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29597]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement: Vol. 75, No. 219, 
Monday, November 15, 2010, page 69640.

Announced Time and Date of Meeting:  9 a.m.-12 Noon, Wednesday November 
17, 2010.

Changes to Meeting:  Meeting Rescheduled to 9 a.m.-12 Noon, Wednesday 
November 24, 2010.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

Contact Person for Additional Information:  Todd A. Stevenson, Office 
of the Secretary, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814 (301) 504-
7923.

    Dated: November 17, 2010.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-29597 Filed 11-19-10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
§ 3.80 Written agreement to repay debts as alternative to salary offset. ( a ) ( 1 ) The employee may propose, in response to a Notice of Intent to Offset Salary, a written agreement to repay the debt as an alternative to salary offset. Any employee who wishes to do this must submit a proposed written agreement to repay the debt that is received by USDA within 30 days of the date of the Notice of Intent to Offset Salary or 15 days after the date of a hearing decision issued under § 3.78.
( 2 ) For FSA FLP debt, an alternative repayment agreement submitted after a hearing decision must include a payment schedule similar to the payment schedule in the hearing decision and include payment amounts that are at least equal to the payment amounts in the hearing decision.
( b ) USDA will notify the employee whether the employee's proposed written agreement for repayment is acceptable. USDA may accept a repayment agreement instead of proceeding by offset. In making this determination, USDA will balance the USDA interest in collecting the debt against hardship to the employee. If the debt is delinquent and the employee has not disputed its existence or amount, USDA will accept a repayment agreement, instead of offset, for good cause such as, if the employee is able to establish that offset would result in undue financial hardship or would be against equity and good conscience. For FSA FLP debt, a decision by USDA under this paragraph is not subject to review by NAD under part 11 of this title.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Metal Management, Inc.
(the "Corporation") for the period ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report"), I,
Daniel W. Dienst, the Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and
President of the Corporation, and I, Robert C. Larry, Executive Vice President,
Finance, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of the Corporation,
each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) to my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.


/s/ Daniel W. Dienst
-------------------------------------
Daniel W. Dienst
Chairman of the Board, Chief
Executive Officer and President
May 25, 2006


/s/ Robert C. Larry
-------------------------------------
Robert C. Larry
Executive Vice President, Finance,
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer
and Secretary
May 25, 2006

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Corporation and will be retained by the Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.