alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Amendment No. 1 Licensor Licensee party parties
  License Agreement
   Amendment to Section 7.08 of the License Agreement
 Guaranteed Minimum Royalties Guaranteed Minimum Royalties 2007 Guaranteed Minimum Royalty provided




---



##### 



Calendar Year
    
    AmountCalendar year ending December 31, 2007
    
    $9,000,000, plus interest
on any amount thereof paid
after December 1, 2007,
from December 1, 2007 until
the date of payment at the
following interest rates:From December 1, 2007
through December 31, 2007 -
the then current prime rate
as quoted in The Wall
Street Journal(the Prime
Rate) plus 3% per annum;From January 1, 2008
through January 31, 2008 
the then current Prime Rate
plus 3.5% per annum;From February 1, 2008
through February 29, 2008 -
the then current Prime Rate
plus 4.0% per annum; andFrom and after March 1,
2008  the then current
Prime Rate plus 4.5% per
annum.Calendar year ending December 31, 2008
    
    $9,000,000Calendar year ending December 31, 2009
    
    $9,000,000Calendar year ending December 31, 2010
    
    $18,000,000Calendar year ending December 31, 2011
    
    $18,000,000Calendar year ending December 31, 2012
    
    $18,000,000Calendar year ending December 31, 2013
    
    $22,000,000Calendar year ending December 31, 2014
    
    $22,000,000Calendar year ending December 31, 2015
    
    $22,000,000Calendar year ending December 31, 2016
    
    $22,000,000Every calendar year thereafter during the Term
    
    The Guaranteed Minimum
Royalty for the immediately
previous calendar year plus
five percent (5%)
 Amendment to Section 7.13 of the License Agreement
 Late Payments provided
 2




---



##### 



Effect of Amendment
 Governing Law
 Execution in Counterparts
  3




---



##### 



LICENSOR
ELVIS PRESLEY ENTERPRISES, INC.By:
    /s/ Thomas P. BensonName:
    Thomas P. BensonTitle:
    Authorized Officer LICENSEE
FX LUXURY REALTY, LLCBy:
    FX Real Estate and Entertainment Inc.,Managing MemberBy:
    /s/ Paul C. KanavosName:
    Paul C. KanavosTitle:
    President 4
#### In the Matter of United States Trucking Corporation, Appellant, v. Robert Frank, as President of Garage Employees Union Local 272, I. B. T., et al., Respondents.

Order entered December 4, 1968, denying a motion to stay arbitration, unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements, on condition that within 10 days after the entry of the order hereon the union files a duly acknowledged consent to the arbitration. Settle order on notice. Concur— Stevens, P. J., Eager, McGivern, Nunez and McNally, JJ.
#### § 29.1161 [Reserved]
- ABSTRACT
- TABLE OF CONTENTS
- ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
- INTRODUCTION
- DATA COLLECTION
- DATA PROCESSING
- ANALYSIS
Methods for Screening the Data
Follow-Up Studies
Applying the SHE(0) Method to Death Certificates

- SUMMARY
- REFERENCES
- TABLES AND FIGURES
- Appendix A
- Appendix B
- Appendix C
- Appendix D
- Appendix E
- Appendix F
- Appendix G
- Appendix H
- Appendix I
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 60 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

JESSICA J. LYUBLANOVITS

Case 3:20-cv-03678-MCR-EMT Document 12 Filed 12/10/20 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 3:20-cv-03678-MCR-EMT Document 12 Filed 12/10/20 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

JIMI P. MCDONALD,

Inmate No. 1269570,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 3:20cv3004-MCR-EMT

MICHAEL A. ADKINSON, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge’s 

Report and Recommendation dated February 13, 2020. ECF No. 4. Plaintiff has 

been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and afforded an 

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 

636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed 

objections thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be 

adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted 

and incorporated by reference in this Order.
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:20cv3004-MCR-EMT

2. Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2, is 

DENIED.

3. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

4. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 16th day of March 2020.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
§ 3.78 Written decision following a hearing. Written decisions provided after a hearing will include: ( a ) A statement of the facts presented at the hearing to support the nature and origin of the alleged debt and those presented to refute the debt;
( b ) The hearing officer's analysis, findings, and conclusions, considering all the evidence presented and the respective burdens of the parties, in light of the hearing;
( c ) The amount and validity of the alleged debt determined as a result of the hearing;
( d ) The payment schedule (including percentage of disposable pay), if applicable;
( e ) The determination that the amount of the debt at this hearing is the final agency action on this matter regarding the existence and amount of the debt for purposes of executing salary offset under 5 U.S.C. 5514. However, even if the hearing official determines that a debt may not be collected by salary offset, but the creditor agency finds that the debt is still valid, the creditor agency may still pursue collection of the debt by other means authorized by this part; and
( f ) Notice that the final determination by the hearing official regarding the existence and amount of a debt is subject to referral to Treasury under § 3.33 in the same manner as any other delinquent debt.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-41134

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE MONTOYA-RUBIO,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:15-CR-104-1

Before REAVLEY, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Montoya-Rubio

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Montoya-Rubio has filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well 

as Montoya-Rubio’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 20, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-41134 Document: 00513472308 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2016
No. 15-41134

2

appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, 

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from 

further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-41134 Document: 00513472308 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/20/2016
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Sterling Chemicals Holdings, Inc. (formerly Sterling Chemicals, Inc.) on Form
S-3 (File No. 333-30917) of our report dated October 25, 1995, on our audit of
the consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity and
cash flows of Sterling Chemicals Holdings, Inc. for the year ended September
30, 1995, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
Houston, Texas
December 15, 1997
Exhibit 31.2

I, James A. MacLennan, certify that:

|1. |  | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
                    December 31, 2003 of Theragenics Corporation®;
|-- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
                    material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
                    made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
                    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|3. |  | [Intentionally omitted]
|-- |  | -----------------------

|4. |  | [Intentionally omitted]
|-- |  | -----------------------

|5. |  | [Intentionally omitted]
|-- |  | -----------------------

|               | THERAGENICS CORPORATION®                                                                                                 
|-------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|August 2, 2004 | /s/ James A. MacLennanJames A. MacLennanChief Financial Officer and Treasurer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
§ 29.9401 Definitions. As used in this subpart, the following terms shall have the following meanings: ( a ) *Secretary* means the Secretary of Agriculture of the United States, or any officer or employee of the Department to whom authority has heretofore been delegated or may hereafter be delegated to act in his stead.
( b ) *Marketing area* means a geographical area within the flue-cured tobacco production area specified by the Secretary each year on the basis of his determination that significant quantities of tobacco produced in such area are ready for marketing.
( c ) *Resale tobacco* means any tobacco offered for sale, or sold, by someone other than its producer.
( d ) *Nonauction-purchased tobacco* means tobacco purchased at other than a bona fide auction sale, as defined in 7 CFR 29.1(d), on a designated market, as defined in 7 CFR 29.1(e).
( e ) *Nonauction-purchased resale tobacco* means tobacco being offered for sale, or sold, at auction by a person who purchased it at other than a bona fide auction sale, as defined in 7 CFR 29.1(d), on a designated market, as defined in 7 CFR 29.1(e).
[39 FR 17754, May 20, 1974, as amended at 40 FR 31592, July 28, 1975]
POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below
constitutes and appoints Kevin J. Tierney and John-Paul DeRosa his true and
lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, each acting alone, with full powers of
substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in
any and all capacities to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ending December 31, 1996 of UNUM Corporation pursuant to the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and any or all amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all
exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and
agent, each acting alone, full power and authority to do and perform each and
every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the
premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in
person, and hereby ratifies and confirms all his said attorneys-in-fact and
agents, each acting alone, or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or
cause to be done by virtue thereof.

Witness our signatures on the date set forth below:


     Signature                            Title               Date
     ---------                            -----               ----



/s/ Gayle O. Averyt                     Director          February 14, 1997
--------------------
     Gayle O. Averyt


/s/ Robert E. Dillon, Jr.               Director          February 14, 1997
--------------------------
     Robert E. Dillon, Jr.


/s/ Gwain H. Gillespie                  Director          February 14, 1997
-----------------------
     Gwain H. Gillespie


/s/ Ronald E. Goldsberry                Director          February 14, 1997
-------------------------
     Ronald E. Goldsberry


/s/ Donald W. Harward                   Director          February 14, 1997
----------------------
     Donald W. Harward


<PAGE>

     Signature                            Title               Date
     ---------                            -----               ----



/s/ George J. Mitchell                  Director          February 14, 1997
-----------------------
     George J. Mitchell


/s/ Cynthia A. Montgomery               Director          February 14, 1997
--------------------------
     Cynthia A. Montgomery


/s/ James L. Moody, Jr.                 Director          February 14, 1997
------------------------
     James L. Moody, Jr.


/s/ Lawrence R. Pugh                    Director          February 14, 1997
---------------------
     Lawrence R. Pugh


/s/ Lois Dickson Rice                   Director          February 14, 1997
----------------------
     Lois Dickson Rice


/s/ John W. Rowe                        Director          February 14, 1997
-----------------
     John W. Rowe
Editorial Note on Subpart E of Part 301
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part appear at 87 FR 80005, Dec. 29, 2022.

§ 301.45 Notice of quarantine; restriction on interstate movement of specified regulated articles. ( a ) *Notice of quarantine.* Pursuant to the provisions of sections 411, 412, 414, 431, and 434 of the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7711, 7712, 7714, 7751, and 7754), the Secretary of Agriculture hereby establishes a quarantine within the United States to prevent the spread of the gypsy moth, *Lymantria dispar* (Linnaeus), a dangerous insect injurious to forests and shade trees and not widely prevalent or distributed throughout the United States, and establishes regulations governing the interstate movement of regulated articles and outdoor household articles from quarantined areas of the United States.
( b ) *Restrictions on the interstate movement of regulated articles and outdoor household articles.* No common carrier or other person may move interstate from any quarantined area any regulated article or outdoor household article except in accordance with the conditions prescribed in this subpart.
[58 FR 39423, July 23, 1993, as amended at 62 FR 29287, May 30, 1997; 63 FR 38280, July 16, 1998; 66 FR 21050, Apr. 27, 2001; 66 FR 37114, July 17, 2001; 87 FR 80005, Dec. 29, 2022]
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T20:41:59-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
#### § 29.9238 When application may be rejected.

An application may be rejected (a) for noncompliance with the act or the regulations in this subpart, or (b) when it is not practicable to provide the service. All expenses incurred in connection with an application rejected for noncompliance with the act or the regulations in this subpart shall be paid by the applicant as provided in § 29.124 of subpart B of this part.
#### § 33.60 OMB control number assigned pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act.

The OMB control number assigned pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act for this part is OMB No. 0581-0143.
_______________________________________ __ Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 28, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh 128265 Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 128265 COA: 258541 Wayne CC: 03-001476-01 PATRICK LEE BATES, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 25, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0919 I, CORBIN R. DAVIS, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 28, 2005

Clerk
§ 3201.16 Adhesive and mastic removers. ( a ) *Definition.* Solvent products formulated for use in removing asbestos, carpet, and tile mastics as well as adhesive materials, including glue, tape, and gum, from various surface types.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The preferred procurement product must have a biobased content of at least 58 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than May 14, 2009, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased adhesive and mastic removers. By that date, Federal agencies that have the responsibility for drafting or reviewing specifications for items to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased adhesive and mastic removers.
[73 FR 27953, May 14, 2008]
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 00-2483

___________

Eirtis McKay, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Eastern District of Missouri.

*

James D. Purkett, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: May 31, 2001

 Filed: June 11, 2001

___________

Before BOWMAN, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Missouri inmate Eirtis McKay pleaded guilty to first degree assault and armed

criminal action, and the Missouri courts denied his motion for postconviction relief.

See McKay v. State, 963 S.W.2d 391 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998). McKay then timely sought

habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, asserting three claims of error by the state

postconviction trial court. More than a year later, after the one-year federal habeas

statute of limitations had run, see 28 U.S.C § 2244(d), McKay filed an amended

petition for habeas relief, asserting three claims of ineffective assistance of counsel

occurring prior to his guilty plea and at sentencing. Respondent moved to dismiss the

amended petition as untimely.
1The HONORABLE LAWRENCE O. DAVIS, United States Magistrate Judge

for the Eastern District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition

by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

-2-

The district court1 dismissed McKay’s original claims of state court error as

uncognizable and dismissed his amended claims as untimely. McKay appeals the

dismissal of his amended claims. Those claims are untimely unless they relate back to

the filing date of the original claims under Rule 15(c)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure. An amended pleading relates back if the claims asserted “arose out of the

same conduct, transaction, or occurrence” as the original claims. United States v.

Craycraft, 167 F.3d 451, 457 (8th Cir. 1999). Here, the original claims challenged the

conduct by the trial court in the state postconviction proceedings, whereas the amended

complaint challenged the conduct of McKay’s counsel prior to his conviction and

sentence. The district court did not abuse its discretion in ruling that McKay’s

amended claims do not relate back to his original claims of state court error. See Shea

v. Eienstein, 208 F.3d 712, 720 (8th Cir. 2000) (standard of review), cert. denied, 121

S. Ct. 172 (2000). 

Accordingly, we affirm. 

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Page 1 of 2

Case No. 4:20cv186-RH-MJF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

MONICA ACERRA et al.,

Plaintiffs,

CONSOLIDATED

v. CASE NO. 4:20cv186-RH-MJF

TRUELIEVE CANNABIS CORP. et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________________/

AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The defendants’ consented motion, ECF No. 17, to amend the initial 

scheduling order is granted. 

2. The plaintiffs may file an amended complaint by June 29, 2020.

3. The deadline for the defendants to respond to an amended complaint is 60 

days after the amended complaint is filed.

4. The deadline to respond to a motion to dismiss is 45 days after the motion 

is filed.

Case 4:20-cv-00186-RH-MJF Document 22 Filed 04/28/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 4:20cv186-RH-MJF

5. The defendants may file a reply memorandum in support of a motion to 

dismiss. The deadline for a reply memorandum is 30 days after the response to the 

motion to dismiss is filed.

6. The deadline for the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) conference is 

21 days after entry of an order on a motion to dismiss. The deadline for the 26(f) 

report is 14 days after the conference.

7. Discovery may begin after the 26(f) conference.

8. The deadlines for Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) disclosures are 

extended to (a) dates the parties agree to at the 26(f) conference or (b) dates set by 

order after the 26(f) report is filed.

9. The presumptive discovery deadline and trial date in the initial scheduling 

order are vacated.

10. Except as modified by this order, the initial scheduling order remains in 

effect.

SO ORDERED on April 28, 2020.

s/Robert L. Hinkle

United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00186-RH-MJF Document 22 Filed 04/28/20 Page 2 of 2