alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCTS 

LIABILITY LITIGATION 

This Document Relates to: 

Niela Peters, 8:20-cv-18049 

Case No. 3:19md2885 

Judge M. Casey Rodgers 

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones 

NOTICE OF DESIGNATED FORUM 

Plaintiff, Niela Peters, by and through counsel of record, files this Notice of 

Designated Forum, and would show the Court that venue would be proper in the United 

States District Court, Northern District of Illinois absent direct filing on the 

administrative docket. Plaintiff reserves the right to amend this designation of proper 

venue and forum, once case specific fact and expert discovery is complete. 

Plaintiff therefore requests that the Court take notice of this designation of forum. 

Dated: March 23, 2022 

Respectfully submitted, 

 By: /s/ Joel L. DiLorenzo 

 Joel L. DiLorenzo 

 Alabama State Bar No. 7575-J64D 

 THE DILORENZO LAW FIRM, LLC 

 505 20th St. N, Ste. 1275 

 Birmingham, AL 35203 

 Phone: (205) 212-9988 

 Facsimile: (205) 212-9989 

 Email: joel@dilorenzo-law.com

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

Case 8:20-cv-18049-MCR-GRJ Document 3 Filed 03/23/22 Page 1 of 2
2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I do hereby certify that on this 23rd day of March, 2022, a true and correct copy of 

the foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of Court and served using the 

CM/ECF system. 

/s/ Joel L. DiLorenzo 

Case 8:20-cv-18049-MCR-GRJ Document 3 Filed 03/23/22 Page 2 of 2
§ 318.13-17 Cut flowers from Hawaii. ( a ) Except for cut blooms and leis of mauna loa and jade vine and except for cut blooms of gardenia not grown in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section, cut flowers may be moved interstate from Hawaii under limited permit, to a destination specified in the permit, directly from an establishment operated in accordance with the terms of a compliance agreement executed by the operator of the establishment, if the articles have not been exposed to infestation and they are not accompanied by any articles prohibited interstate movement under this subpart.
( b ) Cut blooms of gardenia may be moved interstate from Hawaii if grown and inspected in accordance with the provisions of this section.[4] ( 1 ) The grower's production area must be inspected annually by an inspector and found free of green scale. If green scale is found during an inspection, a 2-month ban will be placed on the interstate movement of cut blooms of gardenia from that production area. Near the end of the 2 months, an inspector will reinspect the grower's production area to determine whether green scale is present. If reinspection determines that the production area is free of green scale, shipping may resume. If reinspection determines that green scale is still present in the production area, another 2-month ban on shipping will be placed on the interstate movement of gardenia from that production area. Each ban will be followed by reinspection in the manner specified, and the production area must be found free of green scale prior to interstate movement.
( 2 ) The grower must establish a buffer area surrounding gardenia production areas. The buffer area must extend 20 feet from the edge of the production area. Within the buffer area, the growing of gardenias and the following green scale host plants is prohibited: Ixora, ginger (*Alpinia purpurata*), plumeria, coffee, rambutan, litchi, guava, citrus, anthurium, avocado, banana, cocoa, macadamia, celery, *Pluchea indica,* mango, orchids, and annona.
( 3 ) An inspector must visually inspect the cut blooms of gardenias in each consignment prior to interstate movement from Hawaii to the mainland United States. If the inspector does not detect green scale in the consignment, the inspector will certify the consignment in accordance with § 318.13-3(b). If the inspector finds green scale in a consignment, that consignment will be ineligible for interstate movement from Hawaii.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0198) [74 FR 2775, Jan 16, 2009. Redesignated at 83 FR 46638, Sept. 14, 2018] Footnotes -
318.13-17
[4] Cut blooms of gardenia are also eligible for interstate movement with treatment in accordance with part 305 of this chapter.
§ 301.76-10 Attachment and disposition of certificates and limited permits. ( a ) A certificate or limited permit required for the interstate movement of a regulated article, or a copy thereof, must, at all times during the interstate movement, be: ( 1 ) Attached to or legibly printed on the outside of the container containing the regulated article or attached to the regulated article itself, if the article is not packed in a container; and
( 2 ) Attached to or legibly printed on the sealed container in which the article is shipped; and
( 3 ) Attached to the consignee's copy of the accompanying waybill. The host article must be sufficiently described on the certificate or limited permit and on the waybill to identify the article.
( b ) The certificate or limited permit for the interstate movement of a host article must be furnished by the carrier or the carrier's representative to the consignee listed on the certificate or limited permit upon arrival at the location provided on the certificate or limited permit.
§ 2903.13 Evaluation criteria. ( a ) The following evaluation criteria will be used in reviewing applications submitted for the Biodiesel Fuel Education Program: ( 1 ) Relevance of proposed project to current and future issues related to the production, use, distribution, fuel quality, and fuel properties of biodiesel, including: ( i ) Demonstrated knowledge about markets, state initiatives, impacts on local economies, regulatory issues, standards, and technical issues;
( ii ) Demonstrated knowledge about issues associated with developing a biodiesel infrastructure; and
( iii ) Quality and extent of stakeholder involvement in planning and accomplishment of program objectives.
( 2 ) Reasonableness of project proposal, including: ( i ) Sufficiency of scope and strategies to provide a consistent message in keeping with existing standards and regulations;
( ii ) Adequacy of Project Description, suitability and feasibility of methodology to develop and implement program;
( iii ) Clarity of objectives, milestones, and indicators of progress;
( iv ) Adequacy of plans for reporting, assessing and monitoring results over project's duration; and
( v ) Demonstration of feasibility, and probability of success.
( 3 ) Technical quality of proposed project, including: ( i ) Suitability and qualifications of key project personnel;
( ii ) Institutional experience and competence in providing alternative fuel education, including: ( A ) Demonstrated knowledge about programs involved in alternative fuel research and education;
( B ) Demonstrated knowledge about other fuels, fuel additives, engine performance, fuel quality and fuel emissions;
( C ) Demonstrated knowledge about Federal, State and local programs aimed at encouraging alternative fuel use;
( D ) Demonstrated ability in providing educational programs and developing technical programs; and
( E ) Demonstrated ability to analyze technical information relevant to the biodiesel industry.
( iii ) Adequacy of available or obtainable resources; and
( iv ) Quality of plans to administer and maintain the project, including collaborative efforts, evaluation and monitoring efforts.
( b ) [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 31.1

I, Bruce Wasserstein, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2006 of Lazard Group LLC (the Registrant);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.
The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [Reserved]

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the
Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrants
other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 8, 2006



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|                                                      
|/s/    Bruce Wasserstein                              
|Bruce Wasserstein Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2



August 9, 2007

Securities and Exchange
Commission

100 F Street, NE

Washington, DC 20549



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Lazard Group
LLC (the Registrant) hereby certifies that the Registrants quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                            
|----------------------------
|                            
|/s/    Michael J. Castellano
|Michael J. Castellano       
|Chief Financial Officer     



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     AUDITED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF METAL RECOVERY  TECHNOLOGIES INC. FOR ITS
     FISCAL YEAR ENDED  DECEMBER  31, 1997 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
     REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000796117
<NAME>                                         Metal Recovery technologies, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         43
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    18
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               62
<PP&E>                                         3007
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 20188
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          7295
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    44
<COMMON>                                       38
<OTHER-SE>                                     65031
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   20188
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  622
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             37
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3909)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3909)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3909)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>ANTI-DILUTIVE
</FN>
        



</TABLE>
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Income  &  Growth
Fund  26  LLC  (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period  ended
September  30,  2008, as filed with the Securities  and  Exchange
Commission  on  the date hereof (the "Report"), the  undersigned,
Robert  P.  Johnson, President of AEI Fund Management XXI,  Inc.,
the  Managing Member of the Company, and Patrick W. Keene,  Chief
Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc., each certify,
pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section  906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Company.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing Member
                              November 7, 2008



                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing Member
                              November 7, 2008
97-231.

#### State ex rel. Mallory v. Pub. Emp. Retirement Bd.

Franklin App. No. 96APD05-674. Reported at 82 Ohio St.3d 235, 694 N.E.2d 1356. On motions for reconsideration. Motions denied.

Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2353 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2353

To amend title 23, United States Code, with respect to the operation of 
    vehicles on certain Wisconsin highways, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 13, 2013

 Mr. Petri (for himself and Mr. Ribble) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 23, United States Code, with respect to the operation of 
    vehicles on certain Wisconsin highways, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OPERATION OF VEHICLES ON CERTAIN WISCONSIN HIGHWAYS.

    Section 127 of title 23, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(j) Operation of Vehicles on Certain Wisconsin Highways.--If any 
segment of the United States Route 41 corridor, as described in section 
1105(c)(57) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 
1991, is designated as a route on the Interstate System, a vehicle that 
could operate legally on that segment before the date of such 
designation may continue to operate on that segment, without regard to 
any requirement under subsection (a).''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Marine Midland Bank, Respondent, v Shayne St. Louis et al., Appellants.

Appeal (1) from an order of the County Court of Franklin County, entered August 13, 1979, which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and (2) from the judgment entered thereon. The defendants sought to avoid liability on this unpaid obligation in the form of a retail installment contract by alleging that the plaintiff failed to carry out the repossession and sale of the collateral security (a motor vehicle) in a "commercially reasonable” manner as required by subdivision (3) of section 9-504 of the Uniform Commercial Code. The County Court granted summary judgment upon a finding that the mere fact of a resale of the security at a price much less than the original price does not by itself create a triable issue of fact. For the reasons set forth in the decision of the County Court, summary judgment was properly granted. (See *Bankers Trust Co. v Dohler & Co.,*47 NY2d 128, 134, 136.) Order and judgment affirmed, with costs. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Staley, Jr., Casey and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
§ 301.85-7 Attachment and disposition of certificates and permits. ( a ) If a certificate or permit is required for the interstate movement of regulated articles, the certificate or permit shall be securely attached to the outside of the container in which such articles are moved, except that, where the certificate or permit is attached to the waybill or other shipping document, and the regulated articles are adequately described on the certificate, permit, or shipping document, the attachment of the certificate or permit to each container of the articles is not required.
( b ) In all cases, certificates or permits shall be furnished by the carrier to the consignee at the destination of the shipment.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MARK
VII, INC. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 28, 1996
AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 28, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1996
<CASH>                                             959
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   75,008
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,693
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                82,988
<PP&E>                                           8,732
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,214
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  93,597
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           62,958
<BONDS>                                            601
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           495
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,543
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    93,597
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               563,913
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  489,292
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                64,403
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 266
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,952
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,180
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,772
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,772
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.20
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
10.12


 


Executive Officers 2005 Annual Incentive Program

under the Dade Behring 2004 Incentive Compensation Plan


 


 


2005 Annual Incentive Target Percent = 120%
for the CEO


 


75%
for each other executive officer


 


2005 Annual Incentive Target Amount = 120% of
December 31, 2005 Annual Base Salary for the CEO


 


75%
of December 31, 2005 Annual Base Salary for each other executive officer


 


The 2005 annual incentive program will be
funded (in the percentages indicated) with a maximum of $2,800,000 for the CEO,
1,000,000 Euros for one executive officer and $1,000,000 for each of the other
executive officers upon achievement of the financial measures established for
each of the following:


 


-                                            Net Income
(50%)


-                                            Cash Flow (20%)


-                                            EBITDA
(earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) (20%); and


-                                            Revenue Growth
(10%)


 


•                  Each financial measure funds
independently from the others and the Program will be fully funded only if all
four financial measures are achieved.


 


•                  The calculation with respect
to sixty percent of each potential bonus amount is based upon a comparison of
actual performance for such financial measures to target objectives established
for such financial measures.


 


•                  The award related to the
remaining forty percent of the potential bonus is based upon individual
performance as evaluated and determined by the Compensation Committee in the
case of the CEO and as evaluated by the CEO and finally determined by the
Compensation Committee in the case of each other executive officer.


 


•                  Bonus amounts may be
adjusted, but not increased, at the discretion of the Compensation Committee.