**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #1 9/3/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDDJ 0.028520539ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #2 9/4/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDDJ 0.008737967ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #3 9/4/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDDJ 0.012525319ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #1 9/3/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDFJ 0.018083398ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #2 9/4/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDFJK 0.001747593ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #3 9/4/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDFJK 0.010128128ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #1 9/3/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD JK 0.012386937ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #2 9/4/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD J 0.004916958ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #3 9/4/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD J 0.00743129ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #1 9/3/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF J 0.010781223ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly ICR Phase II - ARPotlatchForestWar ng/dscm @ Dutch Oven/Pile E, N report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly

shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #2 9/4/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF J 0.001960859ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #3 9/4/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF J 0.014892544ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #1 9/3/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD J 0.00535238ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #2 9/4/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD JK 0.000826404ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #3 9/4/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND (U) 0.001294483ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #1 9/3/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF J 0.008449114ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #2 9/4/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF J 0.001495821ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #3 9/4/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.032062419ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #1 9/3/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF J 0.008602039ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #2 9/4/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND (U) 0.000663493ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #3 9/4/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF J 0.008869604ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #1 9/3/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD J 0.007111019ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #2 9/4/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD JK 0.001999365ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #3 9/4/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND (U) 0.001405353ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Page 1 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #1 9/3/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF J 0.007225713ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #2 9/4/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF JK 0.001033746ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #3 9/4/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.015252122ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #1 9/3/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD J 0.00535238ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #2 9/4/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD J 0.00150767ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #3 9/4/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND (U) 0.001015809ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #1 9/3/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF J 0.007340407ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #2 9/4/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF J 0.001436581ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #3 9/4/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF J 0.005573467ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #1 9/3/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD J 0.008143264ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly ICR Phase II - ARPotlatchForestWar ng/dscm @ Dutch Oven/Pile E, N report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly

shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #2 9/4/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD JK 0.001697239ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #3 9/4/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND (U) 0.001276504ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #1 9/3/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF J 0.00565823ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #2 9/4/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND (U) 0.000399873ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #3 9/4/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND (U) 0.000851003ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #1 9/3/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF J 0.007837414ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #2 9/4/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF J 0.001220353ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #3 9/4/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF J 0.004464767ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #1 9/3/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF J 0.009060815ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #2 9/4/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF J 0.00265101ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #3 9/4/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF JK 0.006772062ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #1 9/3/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD J 0.001972734ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #2 9/4/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD JK 0.00127367ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #3 9/4/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND (U) 0.000731143ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Page 2 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #1 9/3/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF C 0.002167714ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #2 9/4/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF C 0.001972707ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 6/14/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

values were already TEQ values; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates Dioxins/Furans ARPotlatchForestWar

ren Wellons Boiler Sample #3 9/4/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF C 0.004824345ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #1 7/17/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDDB 0.038638087ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #2 7/17/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDDBJ 0.017067679ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #3 7/20/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDDB 0.038955124ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #1 7/17/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF BJ 0.005902196ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #2 7/17/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF ND (U) 0.00156ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #3 7/20/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF BJ 0.004843069ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

E, N treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as

detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #1 7/17/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD BJ 0.015150998ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #2 7/17/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ND (U) 0.00132ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #3 7/20/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD B 0.029865595ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #1 7/17/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BJ 0.004624401ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #2 7/17/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF ND (U) 0.000996ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #3 7/20/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BJ 0.005053638ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #1 7/17/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD J 0.001712854ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #2 7/17/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND (U) 0.00116ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #3 7/20/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD J 0.010423128ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #1 7/17/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BJ 0.004654825ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #2 7/17/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF ND (U) 0.000719ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Page 3 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #3 7/20/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BJK 0.00698ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #1 7/17/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND (U) 0.000791ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #2 7/17/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND (U) 0.00129ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #3 7/20/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND (U) 0.00129ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #1 7/17/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD J 0.003650843ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #2 7/17/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND (U) 0.00123ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #3 7/20/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD J 0.011967295ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #1 7/17/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF JK 0.00255ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that

E, N detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this

congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #2 7/17/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ND (U) 0.000685ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #3 7/20/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF J 0.005931005ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #1 7/17/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD JK 0.00196ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #2 7/17/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND (U) 0.00137ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #3 7/20/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD J 0.01372203ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #1 7/17/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF J 0.003894232ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #2 7/17/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF JK 0.002278493ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #3 7/20/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF J 0.017126217ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #1 7/17/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD JK 0.0042ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #2 7/17/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND (U) 0.00113ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #3 7/20/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD J 0.014599398ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Page 4 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #1 7/17/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND (U) 0.00035ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #2 7/17/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND (U) 0.000908ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #3 7/20/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF JK 0.00157ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #1 7/17/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF JK 0.00307ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #2 7/17/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND (U) 0.000778ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #3 7/20/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF J 0.009475571ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #1 7/17/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF JK 0.00517ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #2 7/17/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF ND (U) 0.0009ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that

E, N detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this

congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #3 7/20/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.018705478ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #1 7/17/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD 0.012534561ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #2 7/17/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND (U) 0.00126ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #3 7/20/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD 0.007054036ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #1 7/17/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF C 0.018254214ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #2 7/17/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF ND (U) 0.00146ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, N 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ARWeyerhaeuserDier ksMill SN-45 Sample #3 7/20/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF C 0.064223312ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 0.0024ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #2 8/20/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 0.002ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #3 8/20/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 0.0016ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF 0.0006ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #2 8/20/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF 0.0007ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #3 8/20/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF 0.0006ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ND 0.0007ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

Page 5 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #2 8/20/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.0007ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #3 8/20/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ND 0.0006ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF ND 0.0007ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #2 8/20/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF ND 0.0006ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #3 8/20/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF ND 0.0004ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.0002ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #2 8/20/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.0002ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #3 8/20/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.0002ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.0006ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #2 8/20/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.0004ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #3 8/20/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.0004ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.0003ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #2 8/20/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.0003ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #3 8/20/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.0003ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid
8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non- ICR Phase II - ng/dscm @ N detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD 0.0003ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #2 8/20/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD 0.0002ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #3 8/20/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.0002ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.0004ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #2 8/20/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.0003ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #3 8/20/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.0004ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.0002ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #2 8/20/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD 0.0003ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #3 8/20/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.0002ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF 0.0003ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #2 8/20/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF 0.0004ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #3 8/20/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.0002ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.0002ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #2 8/20/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD 0.0003ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #3 8/20/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.0002ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF 0.0003ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #2 8/20/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.0003ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #3 8/20/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.0003ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

Page 6 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #1 8/19/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.0004ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #2 8/20/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.0003ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #3 8/20/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.0003ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #1 8/19/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.0006ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #2 8/20/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.0005ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #3 8/20/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.0007ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #1 8/19/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.0004ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #2 8/20/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.0003ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #3 8/20/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.0003ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #1 8/19/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.0013ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #2 8/20/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.001ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans CTElectric Boat EMU 17 Sample #3 8/20/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.001ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 No Equipment No. 4 Fuel oil Downstream N/A Light Liquid

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDDADL 0.00566ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDDBDL 0.00465ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal
8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non- ICR Phase II - IAADMCornProcessin ng/dscm @ Coal: Bituminous/Coal: N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDDBDL 0.00374ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF EMPC 0.021ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF BDL 0.00428ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF BDL 0.00366ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD BDL 0.00338ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD BDL 0.00293ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD BDL 0.00249ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF EMPC 0.0139ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.00307ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.0023ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00608ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00579ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00522ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00528ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.0181ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.00401ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.00425ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Page 7 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.00319ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00453ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00499ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00476ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00417ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00422ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00302ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.00409ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.0042ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.00356ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00342ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.0038ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00257ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.00557ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal
8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non- ICR Phase II - IAADMCornProcessin ng/dscm @ Coal: Bituminous/Coal: N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.00614ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.00585ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.00503ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.00509ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.00365ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #1 8/11/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00632ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #2 8/11/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00639ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #3 8/12/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00458ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #1 8/11/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00348ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #2 8/11/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00465ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #3 8/12/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00261ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #1 8/11/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.00349ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #2 8/11/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.00327ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #3 8/12/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.0027ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #1 8/11/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF EMPC 0.0116ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #2 8/11/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF BDL 0.00289ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAADMCornProcessin gCR EU-501B Sample #3 8/12/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF EMPC 0.00342ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #1 8/24/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDDADL 0.306ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Page 8 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #2 8/24/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDDADL 0.138ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #3 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDDADL 0.174ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #1 8/24/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF EMPC 0.00701ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #2 8/24/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF BDL 0.00361ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #3 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF BDL 0.00247ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #1 8/24/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD EMPC 0.0154ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #2 8/24/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD EMPC 0.0123ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #3 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD BDL 0.00105ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #1 8/24/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF EMPC 0.00301ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #2 8/24/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.0013ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #3 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.000763ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #1 8/24/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00104ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #2 8/24/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00224ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #3 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00141ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal
8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non- ICR Phase II - IAArchersDanielsMidl ng/dscm @ N detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #1 8/24/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00074ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #2 8/24/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00166ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #3 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00125ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #1 8/24/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.00094ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #2 8/24/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.0018ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #3 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.00106ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #1 8/24/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.000855ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #2 8/24/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00184ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #3 8/25/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00116ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #1 8/24/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.000592ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #2 8/24/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00133ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #3 8/25/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.000998ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #1 8/24/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.000701ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #2 8/24/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.00125ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #3 8/25/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.00112ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #1 8/24/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.000569ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #2 8/24/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.000884ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #3 8/25/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.000771ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Page 9 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #1 8/24/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.00105ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #2 8/24/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.00226ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #3 8/25/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.00142ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #1 8/24/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.000896ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #2 8/24/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.00202ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #3 8/25/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.00151ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #1 8/24/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.000714ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #2 8/24/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.0016ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #3 8/25/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.0012ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #1 8/24/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.000578ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #2 8/24/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.000899ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #3 8/25/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.000784ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #1 8/24/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000504ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #2 8/24/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000876ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal
8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non- ICR Phase II - IAArchersDanielsMidl ng/dscm @ N detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #3 8/25/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000628ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #1 8/24/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF BDL 0.000387ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #2 8/24/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF BDL 0.000684ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IAArchersDanielsMidl andDesMoines Asea Boiler #1 Sample #3 8/25/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF EMPC 0.00316ng/dscm @ 7% O2 USEPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Sub-bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #1 6/4/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 0.01359ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #2 6/5/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 0.00291ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #3 6/5/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 0.00194ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #1 6/4/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF 0.0068ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #2 6/5/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF ND 0.00044ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #3 6/5/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF ND 0.00045ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #1 6/4/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.00255ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #2 6/5/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ND 0.0003ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Page 10 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #3 6/5/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ND 0.00031ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #1 6/4/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 0.00156ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #2 6/5/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF ND 0.00018ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #3 6/5/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF ND 0.00018ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #1 6/4/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.00017ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #2 6/5/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.00017ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #3 6/5/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.00017ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #1 6/4/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.00048ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #2 6/5/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.0001ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #3 6/5/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.00011ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #1 6/4/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF 0.0015ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #2 6/5/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.00021ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #3 6/5/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.00022ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #1 6/4/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD 0.00016ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #2 6/5/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.00016ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #3 6/5/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.00017ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #1 6/4/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.00041ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #2 6/5/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.0001ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #3 6/5/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.0001ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Page 11 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #1 6/4/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD 0.00041ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #2 6/5/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.00022ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #3 6/5/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.00023ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #1 6/4/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF 0.00051ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #2 6/5/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.00021ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #3 6/5/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.00021ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #1 6/4/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD 0.00088ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #2 6/5/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.00015ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #3 6/5/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.00016ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #1 6/4/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF 0.00082ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #2 6/5/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.00011ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #3 6/5/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.00011ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #1 6/4/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.00116ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #2 6/5/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.00012ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #3 6/5/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.00012ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #1 6/4/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.0002ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #2 6/5/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.0002ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #3 6/5/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.00021ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #1 6/4/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.00044ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Page 12 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #2 6/5/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.00044ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #3 6/5/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.00045ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #1 6/4/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF ND 0.00025ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #2 6/5/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.00193ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Z 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of

D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans IARoquetteAmerica Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler (121) Sample #3 6/5/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF ND 0.00026ng/dscm @ 7% O2 US EPA Method 23 Dry Scrubbing, General/Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be

treated as non-detects Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT IDPotlatch PB-1 CE M23-R1 7/29/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD EMPC 0.002025274ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Fuel Cell Wet Biomass

N 8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be

treated as non-detects Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT IDPotlatch PB-1 CE M23-R3 7/30/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.001728677ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Fuel Cell Wet Biomass

E 8/10/11 - Review of test report shows run value was errantly

high and did not match values listed in test report Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT IDPotlatch PB-1 CE M23-R2 7/30/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.0016ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Fuel Cell Wet Biomass

E 8/10/11 - Review of test report shows run value was errantly

high and did not match values listed in test report Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT IDPotlatch PB-1 CE M23-R3 7/30/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.0015ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Fuel Cell Wet Biomass

N 8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be

treated as non-detects Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT IDPotlatch PB-1 CE M23-R1 7/29/2009Total OCDD EMPC 0.008690268ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Fuel Cell Wet Biomass

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #1 9/9/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDDADL 0.0864ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal N detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #1 9/9/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDDADL 0.0864 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #2 9/9/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDDADL 0.349ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #3 9/9/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDDADL 0.0609ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #1 9/9/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF EMPC 0.0185ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #2 9/9/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF EMPC 0.0142ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #3 9/9/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF BDL 0.00688ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #1 9/9/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ADL 0.0664ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #2 9/9/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD EMPC 0.0395ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #3 9/9/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ADL 0.0299ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #1 9/9/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF EMPC 0.049ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #2 9/9/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF EMPC 0.0187ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #3 9/9/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF ADL 0.0267ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #1 9/9/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00416ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #2 9/9/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00332ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #3 9/9/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00399ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #1 9/9/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF ADL 0.0339ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #2 9/9/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF ADL 0.0165ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #3 9/9/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.0134ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #1 9/9/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.00378ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

Page 13 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #2 9/9/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.00269ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #3 9/9/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.00391ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #1 9/9/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00341ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #2 9/9/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00273ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #3 9/9/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00327ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #1 9/9/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ADL 0.0165ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #2 9/9/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.00891ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #3 9/9/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00267ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #1 9/9/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ADL 0.00741ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #2 9/9/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.00226ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #3 9/9/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.00288ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #1 9/9/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00291ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #2 9/9/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00144ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #3 9/9/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00272ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal
8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non- ICR Phase II - ng/dscm @ N detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #1 9/9/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ADL 0.0188ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #2 9/9/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.00336ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #3 9/9/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.00403ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #1 9/9/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.0217ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #2 9/9/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.00793ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #3 9/9/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.00323ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #1 9/9/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ADL 0.00494ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #2 9/9/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ADL 0.00317ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #3 9/9/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00405ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #1 9/9/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF ADL 0.0147ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #2 9/9/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00146ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #3 9/9/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00276ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #1 9/9/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.00216ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #2 9/9/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.00163ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #3 9/9/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.00198ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #1 9/9/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF ADL 0.0078ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #2 9/9/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF EMPC 0.000763ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/24/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler Sample #3 9/9/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF EMPC 0.0126ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream FB Coal

N 8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not

properly denoted as non-detect Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 1 9/10/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.001082655ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

Page 14 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

N 8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not

properly denoted as non-detect Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 2 9/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.00102339ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N 8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not

properly denoted as non-detect Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 3 9/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.000938367ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N 8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not

properly denoted as non-detect Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 1 9/10/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.000454016ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N 8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not

properly denoted as non-detect Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 2 9/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.000584794ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N 8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not

properly denoted as non-detect Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 3 9/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.000577456ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N 8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not

properly denoted as non-detect Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 3 9/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.000577456ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N 8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not

properly denoted as non-detect Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 1 9/10/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.000698487ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N 8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not

properly denoted as non-detect Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 2 9/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.00095029ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N 8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not

properly denoted as non-detect Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 3 9/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.000613547ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N 8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not

properly denoted as non-detect Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 1 9/10/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.000698487ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N 8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not

properly denoted as non-detect Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 2 9/11/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.000730993ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N 8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not

properly denoted as non-detect Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 3 9/11/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.000577456ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N 8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not

properly denoted as non-detect Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 2 9/11/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.000767542ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N 8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not

properly denoted as non-detect Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 3 9/11/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.000541365ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N 8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not

properly denoted as non-detect Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 2 9/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.000621344ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N 8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not

properly denoted as non-detect Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 3 9/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.000541365ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N 8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not

properly denoted as non-detect Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 2 9/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.000840642ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N 8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not

properly denoted as non-detect Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 3 9/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.000794003ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N 8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not

properly denoted as non-detect Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 2 9/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.001133039ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N 8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not

properly denoted as non-detect Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 3 9/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.000613547ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N 8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not

properly denoted as non-detect Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 1 9/10/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.000663563ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N 8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not

properly denoted as non-detect Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 2 9/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.000804092ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal N 8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not

properly denoted as non-detect Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 2 9/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.000804092ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N 8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not

properly denoted as non-detect Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 3 9/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.000866185ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N 8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not

properly denoted as non-detect Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 2 9/11/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.000584794ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N 8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not

properly denoted as non-detect Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 3 9/11/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.000649638ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N 8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not

properly denoted as non-detect Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 1 9/10/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000768336ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N 8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not

properly denoted as non-detect Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 2 9/11/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000730993ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N 8/16/11 - Review of test report shows congener was not

properly denoted as non-detect Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ILPolyOne B1 3 9/11/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000794003ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Downstream FB Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 0.005722235ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #2 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 0.00928921ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDDEMPC 0.002783915ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF ND 0.001173642ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #2 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF ND 0.000612857ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF ND 0.000639341ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD EMPC 0.001272905ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #2 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.001715228ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD EMPC 0.000758377ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF ND 0.000759072ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #2 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF EMPC 0.001489743ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF ND 0.000435827ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.001294315ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #2 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000828705ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

Page 15 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000524144ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000848604ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #2 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.001004083ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.000566383ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.001097735ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #2 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.001156333ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.000673899ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.001249549ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #2 8/25/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000813288ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000520304ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000797999ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #2 8/25/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.001002155ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.000497265ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.001012096ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal
8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non- ICR Phase II - ng/dscm @ Stoker/SlopedGrate/ N detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #2 8/25/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.000713072ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.000616301ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.000640345ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #2 8/25/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.000996374ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.000892773ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.001376061ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #2 8/25/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.000892304ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.000597102ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.000854443ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #2 8/25/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.000788234ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.000719978ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #1 8/25/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.001272905ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #2 8/25/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.001586104ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #3 8/27/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000950371ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #1 8/25/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.000564438ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #2 8/25/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.001381818ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #3 8/27/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.000808295ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #1 8/25/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.000517726ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

Page 16 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #2 8/25/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.000477951ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #3 8/27/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.000802536ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #1 8/25/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF ND 0.000661755ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #2 8/25/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF EMPC 0.000370027ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans INNotreDame B-4 Sample #3 8/27/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF EMPC 0.000360949ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Unknown Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #1 11/17/20091,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 0.0049ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #2 11/17/20091,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 0.0043ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #3 11/18/20091,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 0.0067ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #1 11/17/20091,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF EMPC 0.0013ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #2 11/17/20091,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF EMPC 0.0054ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #3 11/18/20091,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF 0.003ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #1 11/17/20091,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.0017ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #2 11/17/20091,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD EMPC 0.0018ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #3 11/18/20091,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD EMPC 0.0013ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal
8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non- ICR Phase II - ng/dscm @ Coal: Subbituminous/Process Stoker/SlopedGrate/ N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #1 11/17/20091,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 0.0017ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #2 11/17/20091,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF EMPC 0.0011ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #3 11/18/20091,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF EMPC 0.002ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #1 11/17/20091,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.00092ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #2 11/17/20091,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.00111ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #3 11/18/20091,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.0011ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #1 11/17/20091,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.00135ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #2 11/17/20091,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.00086ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #3 11/18/20091,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.00098ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #1 11/17/20091,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.00071ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #2 11/17/20091,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.00026ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #3 11/18/20091,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.00063ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #1 11/17/20091,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.00092ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #2 11/17/20091,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.0012ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #3 11/18/20091,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.00103ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #1 11/17/20091,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.00098ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #2 11/17/20091,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.00049ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #3 11/18/20091,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.0006ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

Page 17 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #1 11/17/20091,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.00134ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #2 11/17/20091,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.00108ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #3 11/18/20091,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.00065ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #1 11/17/20091,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.00121ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #2 11/17/20091,2,3,7,8 PeCDF 0.0008ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #3 11/18/20091,2,3,7,8 PeCDF EMPC 0.00049ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #1 11/17/20091,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.001ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #2 11/17/20091,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.0014ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #3 11/18/20091,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.0013ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #1 11/17/20091,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.00076ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #2 11/17/20091,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.00135ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #3 11/18/20091,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.00067ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #1 11/17/20092,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.00083ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #2 11/17/20092,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.00038ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal
8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non- ICR Phase II - ng/dscm @ Coal: Subbituminous/Process Stoker/SlopedGrate/ N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #3 11/18/20092,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.00032ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #1 11/17/20092,3,4,7,8 PeCDF EMPC 0.0019ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #2 11/17/20092,3,4,7,8 PeCDF EMPC 0.00047ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #3 11/18/20092,3,4,7,8 PeCDF EMPC 0.0003ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #1 11/17/20092,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.00056ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #2 11/17/20092,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.00071ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #3 11/18/20092,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.00083ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #1 11/17/20092,3,7,8-TCDF 0.0024ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #2 11/17/20092,3,7,8-TCDF 0.0006ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans KYISPChemicals 0AA (Riley) Sample #3 11/18/20092,3,7,8-TCDF 0.0013ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple/Fabric Filter Coal: Subbituminous/Process coproduct gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 1 7/23/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.003051898ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 2 7/24/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.001104031ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 3 7/24/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.000685876ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 1 7/23/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF EMPC/ND 0.004359854ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 2 7/24/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF EMPC/ND 0.00215286ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 3 7/24/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF EMPC/ND 0.002661199ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

Page 18 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 1 7/23/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD 0.00059948ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 2 7/24/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000276008ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 3 7/24/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000301786ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 1 7/23/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.001389703ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 2 7/24/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.000441612ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 3 7/24/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000301786ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 1 7/23/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.000735725ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 2 7/24/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.000331209ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 3 7/24/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.000356656ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 1 7/23/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD 0.001089963ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non- MITBSimonPowerPlan ng/dscm @ Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 2 7/24/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000303609ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 3 7/24/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000329221ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 1 7/23/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.00239792ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 2 7/24/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000331209ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 3 7/24/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000301786ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 1 7/23/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD 0.000490484ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 2 7/24/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD EMPC/ND 0.000386411ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 3 7/24/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.00027435ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 1 7/23/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF EMPC/ND 0.001825689ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 2 7/24/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.000386411ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 3 7/24/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.000301786ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 1 7/23/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD EMPC/ND 0.408736283ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 2 7/24/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.000273248ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 3 7/24/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.00027435ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

Page 19 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 1 7/23/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.000354238ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 2 7/24/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.000414012ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 3 7/24/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.000356656ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 1 7/23/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.001008216ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 2 7/24/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000386411ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 3 7/24/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000329221ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 1 7/23/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.001553198ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 2 7/24/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.000607217ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 3 7/24/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.000301786ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 1 7/23/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.000354238ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non- MITBSimonPowerPlan ng/dscm @ Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 2 7/24/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.000386411ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 3 7/24/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.000329221ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 1 7/23/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.003842121ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 2 7/24/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF EMPC/ND 0.002566872ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 3 7/24/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF EMPC/ND 0.000603571ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 1 7/23/2009Total OCDD 0.004986583ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 2 7/24/2009Total OCDD 0.002732477ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 3 7/24/2009Total OCDD 0.002194804ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 1 7/23/2009Total OCDF 0.002288923ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 2 7/24/2009Total OCDF EMPC/ND 0.000800422ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT MITBSimonPowerPlan t Unit 1 3 7/24/2009Total OCDF 0.000768181ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter/Low NOx Burners/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) Coal: Bituminous Unknown PC Coal

A 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #1 7/4/2007 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.006324982ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

A 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #2 7/4/2007 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ND 0.002914143ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

A 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #3 7/5/2007 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ND 0.005397716ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

A 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #1 7/4/2007 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 0.020582544ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

A 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #2 7/4/2007 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 0.03762923ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

A 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #3 7/5/2007 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 0.022799307ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

Page 20 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

A 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #1 7/4/2007 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.001734099ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

A 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #2 7/4/2007 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.001861657ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

A 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #3 7/5/2007 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.003088245ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

A 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #1 7/4/2007 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.005323526ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

A 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #2 7/4/2007 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.005347312ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

A, N 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory; 8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be treated as non-detects Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #3 7/5/2007 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.003383643ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

A 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #1 7/4/2007 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.002103056ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

A 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #2 7/4/2007 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.002393559ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

A 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #3 7/5/2007 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.003571623ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

A 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #1 7/4/2007 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.001581245ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

A 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #2 7/4/2007 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.001895608ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

A 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #3 7/5/2007 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.003141954ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

A, N 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory; 8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be treated as non-detects Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #1 7/4/2007 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.002055619ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

A 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #2 7/4/2007 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.002150242ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

A 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #3 7/5/2007 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.001737474ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

A 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #1 7/4/2007 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.001317705ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

A 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #2 7/4/2007 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.001414633ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

A 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #3 7/5/2007 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.002900265ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

A 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #1 7/4/2007 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF 0.001602329ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

A 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #2 7/4/2007 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.001414633ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other A 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #2 7/4/2007 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.001414633ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

A 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #3 7/5/2007 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.001823407ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

A 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #1 7/4/2007 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.001792078ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

A 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #2 7/4/2007 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.0019239ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

A 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #3 7/5/2007 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.003195663ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

A 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #1 7/4/2007 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.001344059ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

A 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #2 7/4/2007 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.001601364ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

A 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #3 7/5/2007 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.002132232ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

A, N 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory; 8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be treated as non-detects Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #1 7/4/2007 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.001591787ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

A 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #2 7/4/2007 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.001414633ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

A 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #3 7/5/2007 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.001831464ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

A, N 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory; 8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be treated as non-detects Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #1 7/4/2007 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF EMPC 0.002245368ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

A, N 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory; 8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be treated as non-detects Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #2 7/4/2007 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF EMPC 0.001380682ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

A 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #3 7/5/2007 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.001756272ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

A 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #1 7/4/2007 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.001183299ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

A 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #2 7/4/2007 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.001015706ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

A 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #3 7/5/2007 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.002371235ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

A 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #1 7/4/2007 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.002118869ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

A 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #2 7/4/2007 2,3,7,8-TCDF ND 0.001092096ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

A 1/25/11 - Poultry litter for this unit determined not to be

waste. Added back to inventory Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Dioxins/Furans MNFibrominn EU-001 Sample #3 7/5/2007 2,3,7,8-TCDF ND 0.001826093ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Spray Dryer/Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Poultry LitterDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #1 9/22/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ADL 0.00638ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #2 9/23/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ADL 0.00369ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

Page 21 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #3 9/23/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ADL 0.00182ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #1 9/28/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD BDL 0.00187ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #2 9/29/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ADL 0.00135ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #3 9/30/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD BDL 0.00132ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #1 9/22/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF ADL 0.00246ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #2 9/23/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF ADL 0.00171ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #3 9/23/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.00114ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #1 9/28/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.00101ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #2 9/29/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF ADL 0.000767ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #3 9/30/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.000619ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test ICR Phase II - Additional D/F Data from Test Report - ng/dscm @ Stoker/SlopedGrate/ A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary from Test Report -

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #1 9/22/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00107ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #2 9/23/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.000443ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #3 9/23/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.000526ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #1 9/28/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.0014ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #2 9/29/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.000704ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #3 9/30/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.000869ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #1 9/22/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF ADL 0.000816ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #2 9/23/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF ADL 0.00077ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #3 9/23/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.000523ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #1 9/28/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.000923ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #2 9/29/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00117ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #3 9/30/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.000642ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #1 9/22/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.000726ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #2 9/23/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.000731ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

Page 22 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #3 9/23/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.000642ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #1 9/28/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.00141ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #2 9/29/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.0006ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #3 9/30/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.000916ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #1 9/22/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00223ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #2 9/23/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.000999ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #3 9/23/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.000553ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #1 9/28/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00141ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #2 9/29/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.000694ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #3 9/30/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00085ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test ICR Phase II - Additional D/F Data from Test Report - ng/dscm @ Stoker/SlopedGrate/ A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary from Test Report -

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #1 9/22/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ADL 0.000766ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #2 9/23/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ADL 0.000737ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #3 9/23/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ADL 0.000825ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #1 9/28/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.000892ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #2 9/29/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00042ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #3 9/30/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00615ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #1 9/22/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.00113ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #2 9/23/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.000794ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #3 9/23/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.000684ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #1 9/28/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.00148ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #2 9/29/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.000657ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #3 9/30/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.000987ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #1 9/22/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ADL 0.00124ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #2 9/23/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00105ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

Page 23 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #3 9/23/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ADL 0.00081ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #1 9/28/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.000963ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #2 9/29/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ADL 0.00239ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #3 9/30/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ADL 0.00109ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #1 9/22/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ADL 0.00176ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #2 9/23/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ADL 0.00101ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #3 9/23/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ADL 0.000744ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #1 9/28/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.00151ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #2 9/29/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.00075ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #3 9/30/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.000979ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test ICR Phase II - Additional D/F Data from Test Report - ng/dscm @ Stoker/SlopedGrate/ A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary from Test Report -

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #1 9/22/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.000433ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #2 9/23/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.000514ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #3 9/23/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.000517ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #1 9/28/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.00106ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #2 9/29/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.000604ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #3 9/30/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.000854ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #1 9/22/20102,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ADL 0.000766ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #2 9/23/20102,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ADL 0.000734ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #3 9/23/20102,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.000517ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #1 9/28/20102,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.000892ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #2 9/29/20102,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.000487ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #3 9/30/20102,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.000607ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #1 9/22/20102,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00107ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #2 9/23/20102,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00122ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

Page 24 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #3 9/23/20102,3,4,7,8 PeCDF ADL 0.00105ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #1 9/28/20102,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.000878ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #2 9/29/20102,3,4,7,8 PeCDF ADL 0.00261ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #3 9/30/20102,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.000697ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #1 9/22/20102,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000901ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #2 9/23/20102,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000737ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #3 9/23/20102,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000523ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #1 9/28/20102,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.00152ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #2 9/29/20102,3,7,8-TCDD ADL 0.00105ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #3 9/30/20102,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000924ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test ICR Phase II - Additional D/F Data from Test Report - ng/dscm @ Stoker/SlopedGrate/ A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary from Test Report -

Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #1 9/22/20102,3,7,8-TCDF ADL 0.00354ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #2 9/23/20102,3,7,8-TCDF ADL 0.0033ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #3 9/23/20102,3,7,8-TCDF ADL 0.00182ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #1 9/28/20102,3,7,8-TCDF BDL 0.000718ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #2 9/29/20102,3,7,8-TCDF ADL 0.0113ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #3 9/30/20102,3,7,8-TCDF ADL 0.00415ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #1 9/22/2010Total OCDD ADL 0.0159ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #2 9/23/2010Total OCDD ADL 0.0119ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #3 9/23/2010Total OCDD ADL 0.00678ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #1 9/28/2010Total OCDD BDL 0.0039ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #2 9/29/2010Total OCDD BDL 0.00309ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #3 9/30/2010Total OCDD BDL 0.00435ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #1 9/22/2010Total OCDF BDL 0.00104ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #2 9/23/2010Total OCDF BDL 0.000815ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

Page 25 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 1 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #3 9/23/2010Total OCDF BDL 0.000816ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #1 9/28/2010Total OCDF BDL 0.00228ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #2 9/29/2010Total OCDF BDL 0.000987ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 8/5/11 - Facility voluntarily submitted test report for test

conducted in 2010 Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data

from Test Report - Condition 2 MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power BoilerSample #3 9/30/2010Total OCDF BDL 0.00181ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator /Wood: Bark/ Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Naptha/Natural A entered into database Major SourceBoiler Voluntary Test Report s BF-5002A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.0049324247% O2 EPA Method 23 Precipitator, General Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

Page 26 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #1 9/15/20102,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #2 9/16/20102,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #3 9/17/20102,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #1 9/15/20102,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #2 9/16/20102,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #3 9/17/20102,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #1 9/15/20102,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000978763ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #2 9/16/20102,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000968846ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been ICR Phase II - Additional D/F from NDGreatPlainsSynfuel ng/dscm @ Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet ElectrostaticNaptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #3 9/17/20102,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000990294ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #1 9/15/20102,3,7,8-TCDF BDL 0.000978763ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #2 9/16/20102,3,7,8-TCDF BDL 0.000968846ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #3 9/17/20102,3,7,8-TCDF BDL 0.000990294ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #1 9/15/2010Total OCDD BDL 0.00978763ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #2 9/16/2010Total OCDD BDL 0.00968846ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #3 9/17/2010Total OCDD BDL 0.009902936ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #1 9/15/2010Total OCDF BDL 0.00978763ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #2 9/16/2010Total OCDF BDL 0.00968846ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002A Sample #3 9/17/2010Total OCDF BDL 0.009902936ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

Page 27 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been ICR Phase II - Additional D/F from NDGreatPlainsSynfuel ng/dscm @ Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet ElectrostaticNaptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #1 9/15/20102,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #2 9/16/20102,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #3 9/17/20102,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #1 9/15/20102,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #2 9/16/20102,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #3 9/17/20102,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #1 9/15/20102,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000978763ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

Page 28 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #2 9/16/20102,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000968846ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #3 9/17/20102,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000990294ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #1 9/15/20102,3,7,8-TCDF BDL 0.000978763ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #2 9/16/20102,3,7,8-TCDF BDL 0.000968846ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #3 9/17/20102,3,7,8-TCDF BDL 0.000990294ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #1 9/15/2010Total OCDD BDL 0.00978763ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #2 9/16/2010Total OCDD BDL 0.00968846ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #3 9/17/2010Total OCDD BDL 0.009902936ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #1 9/15/2010Total OCDF BDL 0.00978763ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #2 9/16/2010Total OCDF BDL 0.00968846ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5002B Sample #3 9/17/2010Total OCDF BDL 0.009902936ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been ICR Phase II - Additional D/F from NDGreatPlainsSynfuel ng/dscm @ Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet ElectrostaticNaptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

Page 29 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #1 9/15/20102,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #2 9/16/20102,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been ICR Phase II - Additional D/F from NDGreatPlainsSynfuel ng/dscm @ Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet ElectrostaticNaptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #3 9/17/20102,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #1 9/15/20102,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #2 9/16/20102,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #3 9/17/20102,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #1 9/15/20102,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000978763ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #2 9/16/20102,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000968846ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #3 9/17/20102,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000990294ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #1 9/15/20102,3,7,8-TCDF BDL 0.000978763ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #2 9/16/20102,3,7,8-TCDF BDL 0.000968846ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #3 9/17/20102,3,7,8-TCDF BDL 0.000990294ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #1 9/15/2010Total OCDD BDL 0.00978763ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #2 9/16/2010Total OCDD BDL 0.00968846ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #3 9/17/2010Total OCDD BDL 0.009902936ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #1 9/15/2010Total OCDF BDL 0.00978763ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #2 9/16/2010Total OCDF BDL 0.00968846ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101A Sample #3 9/17/2010Total OCDF BDL 0.009902936ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

Page 30 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been ICR Phase II - Additional D/F from NDGreatPlainsSynfuel ng/dscm @ Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet ElectrostaticNaptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #1 9/15/20102,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

Page 31 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #2 9/16/20102,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #3 9/17/20102,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #1 9/15/20102,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #2 9/16/20102,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #3 9/17/20102,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #1 9/15/20102,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000978763ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #2 9/16/20102,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000968846ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #3 9/17/20102,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000990294ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #1 9/15/20102,3,7,8-TCDF BDL 0.000978763ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #2 9/16/20102,3,7,8-TCDF BDL 0.000968846ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #3 9/17/20102,3,7,8-TCDF BDL 0.000990294ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #1 9/15/2010Total OCDD BDL 0.00978763ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #2 9/16/2010Total OCDD BDL 0.00968846ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #3 9/17/2010Total OCDD BDL 0.009902936ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been ICR Phase II - Additional D/F from NDGreatPlainsSynfuel ng/dscm @ Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet ElectrostaticNaptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #1 9/15/2010Total OCDF BDL 0.00978763ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #2 9/16/2010Total OCDF BDL 0.00968846ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101B Sample #3 9/17/2010Total OCDF BDL 0.009902936ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

Page 32 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been ICR Phase II - Additional D/F from NDGreatPlainsSynfuel ng/dscm @ Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet ElectrostaticNaptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #1 9/15/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #2 9/16/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #3 9/17/2010 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #1 9/15/20102,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #2 9/16/20102,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #3 9/17/20102,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #1 9/15/20102,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00487552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #2 9/16/20102,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.00484423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #3 9/17/20102,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.004932424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #1 9/15/20102,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000978763ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #2 9/16/20102,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000968846ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #3 9/17/20102,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000990294ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #1 9/15/20102,3,7,8-TCDF BDL 0.000978763ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #2 9/16/20102,3,7,8-TCDF BDL 0.000968846ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #3 9/17/20102,3,7,8-TCDF BDL 0.000990294ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #1 9/15/2010Total OCDD BDL 0.00978763ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #2 9/16/2010Total OCDD BDL 0.00968846ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

Page 33 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #3 9/17/2010Total OCDD BDL 0.009902936ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #1 9/15/2010Total OCDF BDL 0.00978763ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #2 9/16/2010Total OCDF BDL 0.00968846ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/31/11 - Facility data could not be added prior to

promulgation due to time constraints; data has now been entered into database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NDGreatPlainsSynfuel

s BF-5101S Sample #3 9/17/2010Total OCDF BDL 0.009902936ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Ammonium Sulfate Flue Gas Desulfurization (FGD)/Wet Electrostatic Precipitator, General Naptha/Natural gas/Phenol/Process Gas/Tar oil Downstream N/A

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #1 11/19/20101,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.000746ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #2 11/19/20101,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ND 0.00142ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #3 11/22/20101,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.000503ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #1 11/19/20101,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF ND 0.00104ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #2 11/19/20101,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF ND 0.00147ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #3 11/22/20101,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF ND 0.00204ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #1 11/19/20101,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000572ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #2 11/19/20101,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000348ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #3 11/22/20101,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000327ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #1 11/19/20101,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000373ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #2 11/19/20101,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000422ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #3 11/22/20101,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000475ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #1 11/19/20101,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.000323ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #2 11/19/20101,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.000422ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #3 11/22/20101,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.000302ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #1 11/19/20101,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000597ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1 A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #1 11/19/20101,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000597ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #2 11/19/20101,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000348ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #3 11/22/20101,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000327ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #1 11/19/20101,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000348ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #2 11/19/20101,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000397ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #3 11/22/20101,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000452ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #1 11/19/20101,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.000597ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #2 11/19/20101,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.00112ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #3 11/22/20101,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.000553ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #1 11/19/20101,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.000696ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #2 11/19/20101,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.000546ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #3 11/22/20101,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.000452ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #1 11/19/20101,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.000522ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #2 11/19/20101,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.000323ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #3 11/22/20101,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.000302ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #1 11/19/20101,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.000423ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #2 11/19/20101,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.000472ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #3 11/22/20101,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.000528ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #1 11/19/20102,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000398ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #2 11/19/20102,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000447ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #3 11/22/20102,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000503ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #1 11/19/20102,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.00224ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #2 11/19/20102,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.00149ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #3 11/22/20102,3,4,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.00138ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #1 11/19/20102,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.00097ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #2 11/19/20102,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.000795ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #3 11/22/20102,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.000754ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #1 11/19/20102,3,7,8-TCDF ND 0.000672ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

Page 34 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #2 11/19/20102,3,7,8-TCDF ND 0.00166ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #3 11/22/20102,3,7,8-TCDF ND 0.000503ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #1 11/19/2010Total OCDD 0.00298ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #2 11/19/2010Total OCDD 0.00323ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #3 11/22/2010Total OCDD 0.00302ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #1 11/19/2010Total OCDF 0.00149ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #2 11/19/2010Total OCDF ND 0.00124ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29002 Sample #3 11/22/2010Total OCDF 0.00201ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Low NOx Burners and Flue Gas Recirculation /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #1 11/16/20101,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.00546ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #2 11/17/20101,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ND 0.000801ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #3 11/18/20101,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.00373ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #1 11/16/20101,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF ND 0.0039ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #2 11/17/20101,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF ND 0.00358ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #3 11/18/20101,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF ND 0.00373ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #1 11/16/20101,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000585ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #2 11/17/20101,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.00059ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #3 11/18/20101,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000538ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & A to database Major SourceBoiler Voluntary Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #3 11/18/20101,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.0005387% O2 EPA Method 23 (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #1 11/16/20101,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.00101ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #2 11/17/20101,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000506ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #3 11/18/20101,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.000828ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #1 11/16/20101,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF 0.00117ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #2 11/17/20101,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.000548ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #3 11/18/20101,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.000662ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #1 11/16/20101,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD 0.00117ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #2 11/17/20101,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.00059ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #3 11/18/20101,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000787ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #1 11/16/20101,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.00117ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #2 11/17/20101,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000506ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #3 11/18/20101,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.000828ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #1 11/16/20101,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.00137ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #2 11/17/20101,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.0011ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #3 11/18/20101,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.000994ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #1 11/16/20101,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.00105ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #2 11/17/20101,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.000843ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #3 11/18/20101,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.00108ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

Page 35 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #1 11/16/20101,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD 0.00078ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #2 11/17/20101,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.000548ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #3 11/18/20101,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD 0.000828ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #1 11/16/20101,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.000975ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #2 11/17/20101,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.00059ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #3 11/18/20101,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.00058ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #1 11/16/20102,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.00187ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #2 11/17/20102,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000548ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #3 11/18/20102,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.0012ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #1 11/16/20102,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.00351ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #2 11/17/20102,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.00295ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #3 11/18/20102,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.0029ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #1 11/16/20102,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.00187ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #2 11/17/20102,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.000585ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1
5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added ICR Phase II - Additional D/F from ng/dscm @ Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #3 11/18/20102,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.00149ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #1 11/16/20102,3,7,8-TCDF 0.00585ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #2 11/17/20102,3,7,8-TCDF ND 0.000885ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #3 11/18/20102,3,7,8-TCDF 0.00373ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #1 11/16/2010Total OCDD 0.0101ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #2 11/17/2010Total OCDD ND 0.00548ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #3 11/18/2010Total OCDD 0.00621ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #1 11/16/2010Total OCDF 0.00468ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #2 11/17/2010Total OCDF 0.00253ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

A 5/13/11 - Additional data submitted in February, now added

to database Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F from

Test Report NJJohnsonMatthey E29004 Sample #3 11/18/2010Total OCDF ND 0.00265ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Catalytic Oxidizer (For CO & VOC)/Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) /Natural gas/ Unknown N/A Gas 1

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDDND 0.00000132ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #2 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 0.00000483ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #3 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 0.00000429ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF ND 0.0000011ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #2 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF 0.000003ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #3 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF 0.000000963ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.0000157ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #2 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.0000239ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

Page 36 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #3 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.000013ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 0.00000789ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #2 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 0.0000121ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #3 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 0.000012ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.0000958ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #2 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.0000721ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #3 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000035ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.0000503ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #2 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.0000503ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #3 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.0000518ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.00000472ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #2 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.00000573ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #3 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.00000357ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.0000868ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid
6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous, ICR Phase II - NYConEd59thStStatio ng/dscm @ C should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #2 8/19/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.0000718ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #3 8/19/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.0000357ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.0000762ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #2 8/19/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.0000438ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #3 8/19/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.0000289ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.0005ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #2 8/19/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.00043ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #3 8/19/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.000389ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.0000195ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #2 8/19/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF 0.0000272ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #3 8/19/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.0000264ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.000103ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #2 8/19/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.0000825ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #3 8/19/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.0000386ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #1 8/19/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.000116ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #2 8/19/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.0000723ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #3 8/19/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.0000453ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #1 8/19/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.0000738ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

Page 37 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #2 8/19/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.000044ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #3 8/19/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.0000296ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #1 8/19/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.00018ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #2 8/19/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.000259ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #3 8/19/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.000258ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #1 8/19/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.000659ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #2 8/19/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.000675ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #3 8/19/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.000289ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #1 8/19/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.0000595ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #2 8/19/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.0000499ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

C 6/10/11 - Control device listed in templates was erroneous,

should have only been FGR as listed in unit's Title V permit Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans NYConEd59thStStatio nNewYork Boiler 118 Sample #3 8/19/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.0000711ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Flue Gas Recirculation No. 6 Residual oil Downstream N/A Heavy Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 0.0388ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/26/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 0.0321ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 0.0201ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal
8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non- ICR Phase II - OHMortonSaltRittmaB002 - Coal-Fired ng/dscm @ Stoker/SlopedGrate/ N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF 0.0284ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/26/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF 0.0131ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF 0.0133ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.0269ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/26/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.0185ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.0111ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 0.0061ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/26/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 0.0046ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 0.0025ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD EMPC 0.00133ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/26/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD EMPC 0.00085ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD EMPC 0.00049ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.004ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/26/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.0026ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.0017ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF EMPC 0.0012ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/26/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF 0.001ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF EMPC 0.00044ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

Page 38 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD 0.0025ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/26/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD 0.0015ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD 0.0014ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.0044ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/26/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.0027ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.0013ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD 0.0017ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/26/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD EMPC 0.0009ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD EMPC 0.0008ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF 0.0062ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/26/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF 0.0036ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF 0.0025ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD 0.0021ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/26/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD EMPC 0.0008ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal
8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non- ICR Phase II - OHMortonSaltRittmaB002 - Coal-Fired ng/dscm @ Stoker/SlopedGrate/ N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD 0.001ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/25/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF EMPC 0.00098ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N, E 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener; 8/26/11 - 2nd review of test report shows corrected values for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/26/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.0014ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N, E 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener; 8/26/11 - 2nd review of test report shows corrected values for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/27/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.00062ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/25/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.0023ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/26/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.0013ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/27/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.0011ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/25/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF EMPC 0.0064ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/26/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF EMPC 0.0027ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/27/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.0021ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/25/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD EMPC 0.00085ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/26/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD 0.00067ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N, E 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener; 8/26/11 - 2nd review of test report shows corrected values for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/27/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.0009ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #1 8/25/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF EMPC 0.0048ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #2 8/26/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.0031ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans OHMortonSaltRittma

n B002 - Coal-Fired

Boiler #2 Sample #3 8/27/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.0027ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Coal

N 8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be

treated as non-detects Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ORRosboroSpringfieldDV 01.1 M23-2 7/23/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD EMPC 0.014339746ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone) Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

N 8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be

treated as non-detects Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ORRosboroSpringfieldDV 01.1 M23-3 7/24/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD EMPC 0.00465567ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone) Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Page 39 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

N 8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be

treated as non-detects Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ORRosboroSpringfieldDV 01.1 M23-2 7/23/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF EMPC 0.001071453ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone) Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

N 8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be

treated as non-detects Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ORRosboroSpringfieldDV 01.1 M23-2 7/23/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.005816459ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone) Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

N 8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be

treated as non-detects Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ORRosboroSpringfieldDV 01.1 M23-2 7/23/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD EMPC 0.005010855ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone) Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

N 8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be

treated as non-detects Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ORRosboroSpringfieldDV 01.1 M23-3 7/24/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD EMPC 0.004703502ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone) Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

N 8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be

treated as non-detects Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ORRosboroSpringfieldDV 01.1 M23-1 7/23/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF EMPC 0.001987753ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone) Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

N 8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be

treated as non-detects Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ORRosboroSpringfieldDV 01.1 M23-2 7/23/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF EMPC 0.00213485ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone) Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

N 8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be

treated as non-detects Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ORRosboroSpringfieldDV 01.1 M23-3 7/24/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.008211199ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone) Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

N 8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be

treated as non-detects Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ORRosboroSpringfieldDV 01.1 M23-2 7/23/2009Total OCDD EMPC 0.010956211ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone) Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

N 8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be

treated as non-detects Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT ORRosboroSpringfieldDV 01.1 M23-3 7/24/2009Total OCDD EMPC 0.016262956ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone) Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 1 10/8/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ADL 0.007054276ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 3 10/8/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ADL 0.006386825ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 4 10/9/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ADL 0.005316624ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 1 10/8/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF EMPC/ND 0.005791932ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 3 10/8/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF EMPC/ND 0.002903102ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 4 10/9/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF EMPC/ND 0.001852763ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass
Natural gas/No. 6

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 1 10/8/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ADL 0.001559366ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 3 10/8/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000798353ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 4 10/9/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.001047214ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 1 10/8/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF ADL 0.002301922ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 3 10/8/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF ADL 0.001161241ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 4 10/9/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF ADL 0.001047214ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 1 10/8/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.001039578ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 3 10/8/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.000798353ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 4 10/9/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.000886104ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 1 10/8/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ADL 0.002376177ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 3 10/8/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000798353ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 4 10/9/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.001047214ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 1 10/8/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ADL 0.0020049ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

Page 40 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 3 10/8/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ADL 0.001016086ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 4 10/9/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ADL 0.000966659ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 1 10/8/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ADL 0.001633622ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 3 10/8/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.000870931ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 4 10/9/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD EMPC/ND 0.000886104ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 1 10/8/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ADL 0.002524688ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 3 10/8/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ADL 0.001451551ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 4 10/9/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ADL 0.001127769ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 1 10/8/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ADL 0.0013366ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 3 10/8/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.000725776ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non- SCBowaterCoatedPapCombination Boiler ng/dscm @ Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Stoker/SlopedGrate/ N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 4 10/9/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.000966659ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 1 10/8/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.001039578ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 3 10/8/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.001016086ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 4 10/9/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.001047214ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 1 10/8/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ADL 0.001633622ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 3 10/8/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000943508ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 4 10/9/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.001047214ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 1 10/8/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF ADL 0.003787033ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 3 10/8/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF ADL 0.001451551ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 4 10/9/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF ADL 0.001933318ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 1 10/8/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD EMPC/ND 0.001039578ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 3 10/8/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD EMPC/ND 0.001016086ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 4 10/9/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD EMPC/ND 0.000966659ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 1 10/8/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF ADL 0.015445152ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

Page 41 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 3 10/8/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF ADL 0.006822291ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 4 10/9/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF ADL 0.005638843ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 1 10/8/2009Total OCDD ADL 0.009801731ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 3 10/8/2009Total OCDD ADL 0.039046727ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 4 10/9/2009Total OCDD ADL 0.01691653ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 1 10/8/2009Total OCDF ADL 0.002895966ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 3 10/8/2009Total OCDF ADL 0.003991766ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT SCBowaterCoatedPap

er Combination Boiler

No. 2 4 10/9/2009Total OCDF ADL 0.003222196ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Centrifuge Collection/Electrostatic Precipitator Natural gas/No. 6 Residual oil/Tire Derived Fuel (TDF)/Wood: BarkDownstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other Wet Biomass

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #1 10/6/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDDADL 0.005665523ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #2 10/6/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDDADL 0.008443842ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #3 10/7/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDDADL 0.011726207ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #1 10/6/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDFADL 0.001155567ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #2 10/6/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDFADL 0.001754851ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #3 10/7/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF BDL 0.00153ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #1 10/6/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ADL 0.003394322ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #2 10/6/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ADL 0.004136259ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #3 10/7/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ADL 0.010942877ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #1 10/6/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF ADL 0.000579031ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #2 10/6/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF BDL 0.000568ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #3 10/7/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF ADL 0.000702623ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #1 10/6/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.000629ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

Page 42 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #2 10/6/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.000651ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #3 10/7/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ADL 0.000469998ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #1 10/6/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.000187ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #2 10/6/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.000213ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #3 10/7/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.000224ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #1 10/6/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.000484ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #2 10/6/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.00046ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #3 10/7/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF BDL 0.000263ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB
7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal:

A, F data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database;

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #1 10/6/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ADL 0.000686352ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #2 10/6/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD BDL 0.000605ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #3 10/7/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ADL 0.002587361ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #1 10/6/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.00018ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #2 10/6/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.000194ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #3 10/7/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ADL 0.000268231ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #1 10/6/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.000432ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #2 10/6/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD BDL 0.000712ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #3 10/7/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ADL 0.000360806ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #1 10/6/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ADL 0.000193177ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #2 10/6/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.000426ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

Page 43 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #3 10/7/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ADL 0.00026111ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #1 10/6/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ADL 0.000673873ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #2 10/6/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ADL 0.000685297ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #3 10/7/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ADL 0.001493074ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #1 10/6/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.000248ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #2 10/6/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.000262ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #3 10/7/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF BDL 0.000172ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #1 10/6/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.000173ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB
7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal:

A, F data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database;

8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #2 10/6/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.0002ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #3 10/7/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF BDL 0.000224ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #1 10/6/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.000382ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #2 10/6/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.000419ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #3 10/7/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF BDL 0.000266ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #1 10/6/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000208ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #2 10/6/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD BDL 0.000428ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #3 10/7/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ADL 0.000213ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #1 10/6/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF BDL 0.000362ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #2 10/6/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF BDL 0.00022ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

A, F 7/27/10 - Facility submitted corrections to D/F data. Original

data did not get moved properly from ERT to the database; 8/17/11 - Correspondence with facility resulted in corrections to fuels burned during ICR testing Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Voluntary Additional D/F Data SCSonocoHartsville Boiler Number 9 Sample #3 10/7/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF BDL 0.000311ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter/Limestone Injection, General/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Biomass/Boiler ash/Coal: Bituminous/Paper and Paper Residues/ Downstream FB

Page 44 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #1 11/18/20091,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDDJ 0.0095ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #2 11/18/20091,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDDJ 0.0072ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #3 11/19/20091,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDDJ 0.0066ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #1 11/18/20091,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDFJ 0.003ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #2 11/18/20091,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDFJ 0.0022ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #3 11/19/20091,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF U 0.0015ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #1 11/18/20091,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.0033ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #2 11/18/20091,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD J 0.002ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #3 11/19/20091,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD J 0.0018ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #1 11/18/20091,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF U/EMPC 0.0072ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #2 11/18/20091,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF U/EMPC 0.0048ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #3 11/19/20091,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF U/EMPC 0.0015ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #1 11/18/20091,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD J 0.0005ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #2 11/18/20091,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD U 0.00037ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for ICR Phase II - TNMilanArmyAmmunD88L-1, Source #27- ng/dscm @ A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #3 11/19/20091,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD U 0.00033ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #1 11/18/20091,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF J 0.0024ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #2 11/18/20091,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF J 0.0013ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #3 11/19/20091,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF J 0.00054ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #1 11/18/20091,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF U/EMPC 0.00066ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #2 11/18/20091,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF U 0.00034ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #3 11/19/20091,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF U 0.00039ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #1 11/18/20091,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD U/EMPC 0.00072ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #2 11/18/20091,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD J 0.00051ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #3 11/19/20091,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD U 0.00036ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #1 11/18/20091,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF J 0.0021ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #2 11/18/20091,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF J 0.0012ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #3 11/19/20091,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF J 0.0011ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #1 11/18/20091,2,3,7,8 PeCDD U/EMPC 0.00044ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #2 11/18/20091,2,3,7,8 PeCDD U 0.00028ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #3 11/19/20091,2,3,7,8 PeCDD U 0.00033ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #1 11/18/20091,2,3,7,8 PeCDF J 0.0013ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #2 11/18/20091,2,3,7,8 PeCDF J 0.00074ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

Page 45 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #3 11/19/20091,2,3,7,8 PeCDF J 0.00081ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #1 11/18/20091,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD J 0.0005ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #2 11/18/20091,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD U 0.00034ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #3 11/19/20091,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD U 0.00033ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #1 11/18/20091,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF U 0.00044ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #2 11/18/20091,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF U 0.00037ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #3 11/19/20091,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF U 0.00039ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #1 11/18/20092,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF J 0.0015ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #2 11/18/20092,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF J 0.00068ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #3 11/19/20092,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF J 0.00051ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #1 11/18/20092,3,4,7,8 PeCDF J 0.0025ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #2 11/18/20092,3,4,7,8 PeCDF J 0.0016ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #3 11/19/20092,3,4,7,8 PeCDF U/EMPC 0.0014ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #1 11/18/20092,3,7,8-TCDD U 0.00038ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for ICR Phase II - TNMilanArmyAmmunD88L-1, Source #27- ng/dscm @ A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #2 11/18/20092,3,7,8-TCDD U 0.00028ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #3 11/19/20092,3,7,8-TCDD U 0.00042ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #1 11/18/20092,3,7,8-TCDF U 0.0063ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #2 11/18/20092,3,7,8-TCDF 0.0031ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

A, N New data added on 3/30/10; 8/25/11 - Review of test report

shows that detect vs. non-detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans TNMilanArmyAmmun itionPlant D88L-1, Source #27-

0010-86 Sample #3 11/19/20092,3,7,8-TCDF U 0.0039ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 No Equipment No. 2 Distillate Unknown N/A Light Liquid

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #1 8/4/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 0.0735ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #2 8/4/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 1.0077ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #3 8/5/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 0.0397ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #1 8/4/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF 0.0307ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #2 8/4/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF 0.4327ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #3 8/5/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF 0.0213ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #1 8/4/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.0374ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #2 8/4/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.449ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #3 8/5/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD EMPC 0.0147ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #1 8/4/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 0.0384ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #2 8/4/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 0.3621ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #3 8/5/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 0.0215ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #1 8/4/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD 0.0044ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

Page 46 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #2 8/4/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD EMPC 0.0187ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N, E 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener; 8/26/11 - 2nd review of test report showed detection limits for this congener and ng/dscm values were calculated Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #3 8/5/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.002784298ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #1 8/4/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.0107ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #2 8/4/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.0771ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #3 8/5/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.0062ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #1 8/4/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF EMPC 0.0098ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #2 8/4/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF 0.1195ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #3 8/5/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF 0.0034ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #1 8/4/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD EMPC 0.0052ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #2 8/4/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD 0.0476ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N, E 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener; 8/26/11 - 2nd review of test report showed detection limits for this congener and ng/dscm values were calculated Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #3 8/5/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.002702246ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #1 8/4/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.0133ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #2 8/4/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.0869ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal N detect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler Templates DioxinFurans o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #2 8/4/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.08697% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #3 8/5/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.0071ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #1 8/4/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD 0.003ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #2 8/4/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD EMPC 0.012ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N, E 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener; 8/26/11 - 2nd review of test report showed detection limits for this congener and ng/dscm values were calculated Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #3 8/5/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.001312832ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #1 8/4/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF 0.0082ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #2 8/4/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF 0.0394ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #3 8/5/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF EMPC 0.0048ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #1 8/4/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD EMPC 0.0043ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #2 8/4/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD EMPC 0.0314ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N, E 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener; 8/26/11 - 2nd review of test report showed detection limits for this congener and ng/dscm values were calculated Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #3 8/5/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.002981223ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #1 8/4/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF 0.0067ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #2 8/4/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF 0.0622ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #3 8/5/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF EMPC 0.0023ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #1 8/4/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.0181ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #2 8/4/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.1581ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #3 8/5/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.0076ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #1 8/4/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.0148ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

Page 47 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #2 8/4/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.0746ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #3 8/5/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF EMPC 0.0053ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #1 8/4/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD 0.0019ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #2 8/4/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD EMPC 0.0022ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N, E 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener; 8/26/11 - 2nd review of test report showed detection limits for this congener and ng/dscm values were calculated Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #3 8/5/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.001318302ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #1 8/4/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF EMPC 0.0075ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #2 8/4/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.0204ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

N 8/25/11 - Review of test report shows that detect vs. nondetect was not properly shown for this congener Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans VAINVISTAWaynesbor

o 2-205 (B#2) Boiler #2Sample #3 8/5/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.0042ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Fabric Filter Coal: Bituminous/Natural gasDownstream PC Coal

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF 0.0289ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF ND 0.00928ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF ND 0.0158ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF 0.078ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF 0.00823ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF 0.0977ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass Z emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined'

values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF 0.0977ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.013ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.355ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.0171ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.484ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.0261ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD 0.42ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 0.0844ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF ND 0.00551ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 0.187ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 0.0115ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 0.205ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 0.0188ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9 OCDD 0.178ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9 OCDDND 0.0114ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9 OCDD 0.0211ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9 OCDD 0.333ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9 OCDD 0.305ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9 OCDD 0.0262ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Page 48 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD 0.0618ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD 0.00274ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD 0.0752ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD 0.00362ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD 0.00488ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD 0.0653ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.0809ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.00558ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.0106ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.151ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.0165ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF 0.151ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF 0.0331ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.00197ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' ICR Phase II - ng/dscm @ Dutch Oven/Pile Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.00285ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF 0.0827ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF 0.00597ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF 0.0918ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD 0.00462ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD 0.133ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD 0.122ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD 0.00591ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD 0.00769ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD 0.103ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.0922ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.0051ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.175ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.0126ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.177ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.0165ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD 0.0827ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.0036ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Page 49 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD 0.102ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD 0.00691ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD 0.0855ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.00687ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF 0.145ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF 0.00843ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF 0.25ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF 0.0188ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF 0.243ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF 0.0259ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.00344ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD 0.103ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD 0.102ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD 0.00537ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' ICR Phase II - ng/dscm @ Dutch Oven/Pile Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD 0.0828ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD 0.0048ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF 0.00603ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF 0.102ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF 0.208ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF 0.0119ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF 0.0163ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF 0.204ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.0466ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.00131ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.094ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.00605ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.0945ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF 0.0071ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.218ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.0108ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.361ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.0243ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Page 50 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.0331ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF 0.353ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD 0.028ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.00118ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.00381ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD 0.0453ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD 0.0408ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.00523ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.0124ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #1 8/11/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.198ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.319ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #2 8/11/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.0268ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Duct WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.0356ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Z 10/28/11 - This data is not representative of the boiler's full

emissions. For this 2009 data, the 'Stack & Duct Combined' values are the correct Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans - Stack WAGraysHarborPaperNo. 6 Boiler (EU2) Sample #3 8/12/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.311ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Mist Separator/Venturi Scrubber Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass
8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be WAKimberlyClarkEverNo. 14 Cogeneration ng/dscm @ Stoker/SlopedGrate/ N 8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be

treated as non-detects Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT WAKimberlyClarkEver ett No. 14 Cogeneration

Boiler M23-R1 8/18/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD EMPC 0.00205631ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Natural gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

N 8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be

treated as non-detects Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT WAKimberlyClarkEver ett No. 14 Cogeneration

Boiler M23-R3 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD EMPC 0.001077097ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Natural gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

N 8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be

treated as non-detects Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT WAKimberlyClarkEver ett No. 14 Cogeneration

Boiler M23-R2 8/18/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.001379813ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Natural gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

N 8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be

treated as non-detects Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT WAKimberlyClarkEver ett No. 14 Cogeneration

Boiler M23-R3 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.001921469ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Natural gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

N 8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be

treated as non-detects Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT WAKimberlyClarkEver ett No. 14 Cogeneration

Boiler M23-R3 8/19/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF EMPC 0.001342641ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Natural gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

N 8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be

treated as non-detects Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT WAKimberlyClarkEver ett No. 14 Cogeneration

Boiler M23-R3 8/19/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD EMPC 0.00209452ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Natural gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

N 8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be

treated as non-detects Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT WAKimberlyClarkEver ett No. 14 Cogeneration

Boiler M23-R1 8/18/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.005686358ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Natural gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

N 8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be

treated as non-detects Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT WAKimberlyClarkEver ett No. 14 Cogeneration

Boiler M23-R2 8/18/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.000960533ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Natural gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

N 8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be

treated as non-detects Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT WAKimberlyClarkEver ett No. 14 Cogeneration

Boiler M23-R3 8/19/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF EMPC 0.0020617ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Natural gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

N 8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be

treated as non-detects Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT WAKimberlyClarkEver ett No. 14 Cogeneration

Boiler M23-R3 8/19/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD EMPC 0.000904045ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Natural gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

N 8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be

treated as non-detects Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT WAKimberlyClarkEver ett No. 14 Cogeneration

Boiler M23-R2 8/18/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF EMPC 0.00074454ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Natural gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

N 8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be

treated as non-detects Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT WAKimberlyClarkEver ett No. 14 Cogeneration

Boiler M23-R3 8/19/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF EMPC 0.001629071ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Natural gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

N 8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be

treated as non-detects Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT WAKimberlyClarkEver ett No. 14 Cogeneration

Boiler M23-R3 8/19/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD EMPC 0.001614153ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Natural gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

N 8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be

treated as non-detects Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT WAKimberlyClarkEver ett No. 14 Cogeneration

Boiler M23-R3 8/19/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF EMPC 0.000808568ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Natural gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

N 8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be

treated as non-detects Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT WAKimberlyClarkEver ett No. 14 Cogeneration

Boiler M23-R2 8/18/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF EMPC 0.001517032ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Natural gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

N 8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be

treated as non-detects Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT WAKimberlyClarkEver ett No. 14 Cogeneration

Boiler M23-R1 8/18/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD EMPC 0.000648552ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Natural gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

N 8/19/11 - Recent guidance shows EMPC values should not be

treated as non-detects Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - ERT ERT WAKimberlyClarkEver ett No. 14 Cogeneration

Boiler M23-R2 8/18/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF EMPC 0.001079964ng/dscm @ 7% O2 Method 23 Fabric Filter Hog Fuel/Natural gas Downstream Stoker/SlopedGrate/ Other

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #1 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 0.002465929ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Page 51 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #2 8/13/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDD 0.002162146ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #3 8/13/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDDND 0.00205ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #1 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF ND 0.00108ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #2 8/13/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF ND 0.000854ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #3 8/13/2009 1,2,3,4,6,5,7,8 OCDF ND 0.000878ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #1 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ND 0.000587ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #2 8/13/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ND 0.000511ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #3 8/13/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDD ND 0.000655ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed

E, Z improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or

baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #1 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 0.000580889ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #2 8/13/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF 0.000673757ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #3 8/13/2009 1,2,3,4,6,7,8 HpCDF ND 0.000424ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #1 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000775ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #2 8/13/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000717ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #3 8/13/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.00048ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #1 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000672ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #2 8/13/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000383ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #3 8/13/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000321ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #1 8/12/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.000293ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #2 8/13/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.000518ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Page 52 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #3 8/13/2009 1,2,3,4,7,8,9 HpCDF ND 0.000503ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #1 8/12/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000712ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #2 8/13/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000658ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #3 8/13/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDD ND 0.000441ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #1 8/12/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000262ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #2 8/13/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000312ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #3 8/13/2009 1,2,3,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000262ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #1 8/12/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.000569ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed

E, Z improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or

baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #2 8/13/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.000646ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #3 8/13/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDD ND 0.000405ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #1 8/12/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.000738ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #2 8/13/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.000619ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #3 8/13/2009 1,2,3,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.000556ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #1 8/12/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.000681ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #2 8/13/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.000631ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #3 8/13/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDD ND 0.000421ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #1 8/12/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.000364ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #2 8/13/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.000435ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #3 8/13/2009 1,2,3,7,8,9 HxCDF ND 0.000365ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Page 53 of 54**Appendix A: Summary of Changes to Dioxin/Furan Congener Emissions**
**Change Code**  **Note For Changes Made Major Source?** **Classification Data Source**  **SourceTab Facility ID**  **Unit ID Sample ID**  **Test Date Congener Name**  **Non Detect?**  **Congener**

**Emissions Congener** 

**Emission Unit Pollutant_Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **Upstream/ Downstream?**  **Combustor Design 90% Fuel Category** 

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #1 8/12/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000319ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #2 8/13/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.00038ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #3 8/13/2009 2,3,4,6,7,8 HxCDF ND 0.000319ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #1 8/12/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.00076ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #2 8/13/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.00064ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #3 8/13/2009 2,3,4,7,8 PeCDF ND 0.000579ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #1 8/12/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.000524ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #2 8/13/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.000441ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed

E, Z improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or

baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #3 8/13/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDD ND 0.000602ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #1 8/12/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.0023862ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #2 8/13/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.002649089ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

E, Z 8/20/10 - NCASI review found that ND portions were initially

treated as zero. Updated values treat ND portions as detection limit; 8/10/11 - Test report review showed improper calculation of D/F emissions, do not use in floor or baseline analyses Major SourceBoiler ICR Phase II - Templates DioxinFurans WAWeyerhaeuser_Ra ymond Hog Fuel Boiler EU1 Sample #3 8/13/2009 2,3,7,8-TCDF 0.002098978ng/dscm @ 7% O2 EPA Method 23 Electrostatic Precipitator Hog Fuel Downstream Dutch Oven/Pile Burner Wet Biomass

Page 54 of 54

# Appendix B: New Facilities Identified from ICF Inventory

CARiversideCement RIVERSIDE CEMENT CO - Qwest19409 NATIONAL TRAIL HIGHWAY

COAtmel ATMEL CORP 1150 E CHEYENNE MTN BLVD

COUSAirForce U.S. AIR FORCE BUCKLEY AFB CO 8120 EDGERTON DR, SUITE 40

GAHerculesBrunswick HERCULES INC - BRUNSW ICK GA 2801 COOK STREET

GAHerculesSavannah HERCULES INC 3000 LOUISVILLE RD

ILCornProductsInt CORN PRODUCTS SPECIALTY INGREDIENTS 6400 SOUTH ARCHER AVE

ILCornProductsInt CORN PRODUCTS SPECIALTY INGREDIENTS 6400 SOUTH ARCHER AVE

ILCornProductsInt CORN PRODUCTS SPECIALTY INGREDIENTS 6400 SOUTH ARCHER AVE

ILCornProductsInt CORN PRODUCTS SPECIALTY INGREDIENTS 6400 SOUTH ARCHER AVE INArcelorMittalEastChicago ARCELORMITTAL USA INC 3210 WATLING STREET
INArcelorMittalEastChicago ARCELORMITTAL USA INC 3210 WATLING STREET
INArcelorMittalEastChicago ARCELORMITTAL USA INC 3210 WATLING STREET
INArcelorMittalEastChicago ARCELORMITTAL USA INC 3210 WATLING STREET
INArcelorMittalEastChicago ARCELORMITTAL USA INC 3210 WATLING STREET KSInnovia INNOVIA FILMS INC 6000 S.E. 2ND ST. KSInnovia INNOVIA FILMS INC 6000 S.E. 2ND ST. KSInnovia INNOVIA FILMS INC 6000 S.E. 2ND ST. KSInnovia INNOVIA FILMS INC 6000 S.E. 2ND ST.

KYAirProducts AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS INC 412 N MAIN ST

KYAirProducts AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS INC 412 N MAIN ST

KYAirProducts AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS INC 412 N MAIN ST

KYAirProducts AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS INC 412 N MAIN ST

KYAirProducts AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS INC 412 N MAIN ST **Facility ID Facility Name**  **Address**

# KYAirProducts AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS INC 412 N MAIN ST

KYAirProducts AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS INC 412 N MAIN ST

LAOccidentalChem OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORP7377 HWY 3214

MOAshland MISSOURI CHEMICAL WORKS 11083 HIGHWAY D

MOAshland MISSOURI CHEMICAL WORKS 11083 HIGHWAY D

MOAshland MISSOURI CHEMICAL WORKS 11083 HIGHWAY D
NCBurlingtonIndustries BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES RAEFORD FACILITY 1001 TURNPIKE RD
NCBurlingtonIndustries BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES RAEFORD FACILITY 1001 TURNPIKE RD
NCBurlingtonIndustries BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES RAEFORD FACILITY 1001 TURNPIKE RD

NCCoatsAmerican COATS AMERICAN SEVIER PLANT 630 AMERICAN THREAD ROAD

NCDakAmericas DAK AMERICAS LLC CAPE FEAR SITE 3500 DANIELS ROAD NE

NCDakAmericas DAK AMERICAS LLC CAPE FEAR SITE 3500 DANIELS ROAD NE

NCDakAmericas DAK AMERICAS LLC CAPE FEAR SITE 3500 DANIELS ROAD NE

NCDakAmericas DAK AMERICAS LLC CAPE FEAR SITE 3500 DANIELS ROAD NE

NCDakAmericas DAK AMERICAS LLC CAPE FEAR SITE 3500 DANIELS ROAD NE

NCDakAmericas DAK AMERICAS LLC CAPE FEAR SITE 3500 DANIELS ROAD NE

NCDakAmericas DAK AMERICAS LLC CAPE FEAR SITE 3500 DANIELS ROAD NE

NCDakAmericas DAK AMERICAS LLC CAPE FEAR SITE 3500 DANIELS ROAD NE

NCIACAlbemarle INTERNATIONAL AUTOMOTIVE COMPONENTS ALBEMARLE PLANT 313 BETHANY ROAD

NDTesoro TESORO REFINING & MARKETING CO - MANDAN REFINERY 900 OLD RED TRAIL NE

NDTesoro TESORO REFINING & MARKETING CO - MANDAN REFINERY 900 OLD RED TRAIL NE

# NDTesoro TESORO REFINING & MARKETING CO - MANDAN REFINERY 900 OLD RED TRAIL NE

NDTesoro TESORO REFINING & MARKETING CO - MANDAN REFINERY 900 OLD RED TRAIL NE

NDTesoro TESORO REFINING & MARKETING CO - MANDAN REFINERY 900 OLD RED TRAIL NE

NDTesoro TESORO REFINING & MARKETING CO - MANDAN REFINERY 900 OLD RED TRAIL NE

NDTesoro TESORO REFINING & MARKETING CO - MANDAN REFINERY 900 OLD RED TRAIL NE

NDTesoro TESORO REFINING & MARKETING CO - MANDAN REFINERY 900 OLD RED TRAIL NE

NDTesoro TESORO REFINING & MARKETING CO - MANDAN REFINERY 900 OLD RED TRAIL NE

NDTesoro TESORO REFINING & MARKETING CO - MANDAN REFINERY 900 OLD RED TRAIL NE

NDTesoro TESORO REFINING & MARKETING CO - MANDAN REFINERY 900 OLD RED TRAIL NE

NDTesoro TESORO REFINING & MARKETING CO - MANDAN REFINERY 900 OLD RED TRAIL NE

NDTesoro TESORO REFINING & MARKETING CO - MANDAN REFINERY 900 OLD RED TRAIL NE

NDTesoro TESORO REFINING & MARKETING CO - MANDAN REFINERY 900 OLD RED TRAIL NE

NDTesoro TESORO REFINING & MARKETING CO - MANDAN REFINERY 900 OLD RED TRAIL NE NJChemtura CHEMTURA CORP 1000 CONVERY BLVD

NJHercules HERCULES INC (PARLIN PLANT)50 S MINNISINK AVE NJPolyOne POLYONE CORP RT 130 & PORCUPINE RD NJPolyOne POLYONE CORP RT 130 & PORCUPINE RD NYMortonSalt MORTON SALT 45 RIBAUD AVE E NYMortonSalt MORTON SALT 45 RIBAUD AVE E NYMortonSalt MORTON SALT 45 RIBAUD AVE E

# NYWyeth WYETH 64 MAPLE ST

OHEmeraldPerformance EMERALD POLYMER ADDITIVES LLC 240 WEST EMERLING AVENUE

OHEmeraldPerformance EMERALD POLYMER ADDITIVES LLC 240 WEST EMERLING AVENUE

OHEmeraldPerformance EMERALD POLYMER ADDITIVES LLC 240 WEST EMERLING AVENUE

OHEmeraldPerformance EMERALD POLYMER ADDITIVES LLC 240 WEST EMERLING AVENUE

OHEmeraldPerformance EMERALD POLYMER ADDITIVES LLC 240 WEST EMERLING AVENUE OHFormica FORMICA CORP 10155 READING RD OHFormica FORMICA CORP 10155 READING RD OHFormica FORMICA CORP 10155 READING RD

OHFormica FORMICA CORP 10155 READING RD OHGoodyear GOODYEAR AKRON PLANT 5 1144 E MARKET ST

PADuPontTowanda DUPONT TOWANDA PLANT PATTERSON BLVD RR 1 BOX 15

PADuPontTowanda DUPONT TOWANDA PLANT PATTERSON BLVD RR 1 BOX 15

PADuPontTowanda DUPONT TOWANDA PLANT PATTERSON BLVD RR 1 BOX 15

PADuPontTowanda DUPONT TOWANDA PLANT PATTERSON BLVD RR 1 BOX 15

PADuPontTowanda DUPONT TOWANDA PLANT PATTERSON BLVD RR 1 BOX 15

PAFortIndiantownGap U.S. ARMY NATIONAL GUARD FORT INDIANTOWN GAP RANGES FT INDIANTOWN GAP PANovaChem NOVA CHEMICALS INC 400 FRANKFORT RD

TXAlon ALON USA - BIG SPRING REFINERY INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon ALON USA - BIG SPRING REFINERY INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon ALON USA - BIG SPRING REFINERY INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon ALON USA - BIG SPRING REFINERY INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon ALON USA - BIG SPRING REFINERY INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon ALON USA - BIG SPRING REFINERY INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon ALON USA - BIG SPRING REFINERY INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon ALON USA - BIG SPRING REFINERY INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

# TXAlon ALON USA - BIG SPRING REFINERY INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon ALON USA - BIG SPRING REFINERY INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon ALON USA - BIG SPRING REFINERY INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon ALON USA - BIG SPRING REFINERY INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon ALON USA - BIG SPRING REFINERY INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon ALON USA - BIG SPRING REFINERY INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon ALON USA - BIG SPRING REFINERY INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon ALON USA - BIG SPRING REFINERY INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon ALON USA - BIG SPRING REFINERY INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon ALON USA - BIG SPRING REFINERY INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon ALON USA - BIG SPRING REFINERY INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon ALON USA - BIG SPRING REFINERY INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon ALON USA - BIG SPRING REFINERY INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon ALON USA - BIG SPRING REFINERY INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon ALON USA - BIG SPRING REFINERY INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon ALON USA - BIG SPRING REFINERY INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon ALON USA - BIG SPRING REFINERY INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon ALON USA - BIG SPRING REFINERY INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon ALON USA - BIG SPRING REFINERY INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon ALON USA - BIG SPRING REFINERY INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon ALON USA - BIG SPRING REFINERY INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon ALON USA - BIG SPRING REFINERY INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon ALON USA - BIG SPRING REFINERY INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

# TXAlon ALON USA - BIG SPRING REFINERY INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20

TXAlon ALON USA - BIG SPRING REFINERY INTX OF REFINERY RD AND IH20
WABPCherryPoint BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD
WABPCherryPoint BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD
WABPCherryPoint BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD
WABPCherryPoint BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD
WABPCherryPoint BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD
WABPCherryPoint BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD
WABPCherryPoint BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD
WABPCherryPoint BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD
WABPCherryPoint BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD
WABPCherryPoint BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD
WABPCherryPoint BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD
WABPCherryPoint BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD
WABPCherryPoint BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD
WABPCherryPoint BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD
WABPCherryPoint BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD
WABPCherryPoint BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD
WABPCherryPoint BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD
WABPCherryPoint BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD
WABPCherryPoint BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD
WABPCherryPoint BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD
WABPCherryPoint BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD

# WABPCherryPoint BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD
WABPCherryPoint BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS CO - Cherry Point 4519 GRANDVIEW RD

WVAmericanWoodmark AMERICAN WOODMARK HARDY COUNTY PLANT INDUSTRIAL PARK RD, RT 220 S

WVAmericanWoodmark AMERICAN WOODMARK HARDY COUNTY PLANT INDUSTRIAL PARK RD, RT 220 S WYNewcastleRefinery WYOMING REFINING CO 740 W MAIN STREET

# ORO GRANDE CA 92368

COLORADO SPRINGS CO 80906

AIR FORCE ACADEMY CO 80840

BRUNSWICK GA 31521 EU01

SAVANNAH GA 31415

BEDFORD PARK IL 60501 B05

BEDFORD PARK IL 60501 B06

BEDFORD PARK IL 60501 B07

BEDFORD PARK IL 60501 B10 EAST CHICAGO IN 46312 12" Bar Mill ISBC Office Boiler

EAST CHICAGO IN 46312 No. 3 Continuous Annealing and Aging Furnace

EAST CHICAGO IN 46312 No. 5 Batch Annealing Furnaces

EAST CHICAGO IN 46312 No. 5 Galvanizing Furnace

EAST CHICAGO IN 46312 No. 6 Batch Annealing Furnaces TECUMSEH KS 66542 EU01 TECUMSEH KS 66542 EU02 TECUMSEH KS 66542 EU03 TECUMSEH KS 66542 EU04

CALVERT CITY KY 42029 BA-2401

CALVERT CITY KY 42029 PA-2101A-1

CALVERT CITY KY 42029 PA-2101A-2

CALVERT CITY KY 42029 PA-2101B-1

CALVERT CITY KY 42029 PA-2101B-2 **Zip City**  **State Unit ID** 

# CALVERT CITY KY 42029 PA-2101C-1

CALVERT CITY KY 42029 PA-2101C-2

CONVENT LA 70723

LOUISIANA MO 63353 EU01

LOUISIANA MO 63353 EU02

LOUISIANA MO 63353 EU03

RAEFORD NC 28376 EU01

RAEFORD NC 28376 EU02

RAEFORD NC 28376 EU03

WOODLAWN NC 28752

LELAND NC 28451 EU01

LELAND NC 28451 EU02

LELAND NC 28451 EU03

LELAND NC 28451 EU04

LELAND NC 28451 EU11

LELAND NC 28451 EU12

LELAND NC 28451 EU13

LELAND NC 28451 EU14

ALBEMARLE NC 28001

MANDAN ND 58554 EUI 11A Heater H-2001

MANDAN ND 58554 EUI 11B Heater H-2002

# MANDAN ND 58554 EUI 2A-1 Heater B-1

MANDAN ND 58554 EUI 2A-2 Heater B-2

MANDAN ND 58554 EUI 3A Heater H-501

MANDAN ND 58554 EUI 3C Heater H-50

MANDAN ND 58554 EUI 4A-1 Heater F-1

MANDAN ND 58554 EUI 4A-2 Heater F-2

MANDAN ND 58554 EUI 4A-3 Heater F-3

MANDAN ND 58554 EUI 4B Heater F-100

MANDAN ND 58554 EUI 4C Heater F-200

MANDAN ND 58554 EUI 4D Heater F-5A

MANDAN ND 58554 EUI 5A Boiler #1

MANDAN ND 58554 EUI 5B Boiler #2

MANDAN ND 58554 EUI 5C Boiler #3 PERTH AMBOY NJ 08062

PARLIN NJ 08859-1045 OLDMANS TOWNSHIP NJ 08067 E200 Boiler #2 OLDMANS TOWNSHIP NJ 08067 E201 Boiler #1 SILVER SPRINGS NY 14550 EU01 SILVER SPRINGS NY 14550 EU02 SILVER SPRINGS NY 14550 EU03

# ROUSES POINT NY 12979

AKRON OH 44301 EU01 (coal boiler)

AKRON OH 44301 EU02 (Gas Boiler #1)

AKRON OH 44301 EU03 (Gas Boiler #2)

AKRON OH 44301 EU04 (ARD Dowtherm Process Heater)

AKRON OH 44301 EU06 (DPA A/O Dowtherm Process Heater) CINCINNATI OH 45241-3109B001 CINCINNATI OH 45241-3109B002 CINCINNATI OH 45241-3109B003

CINCINNATI OH 45241-3109B004 AKRON OH 44316

TOWANDA PA 18848 031

TOWANDA PA 18848 032

TOWANDA PA 18848 033

TOWANDA PA 18848 034

TOWANDA PA 18848 035

ANNVILLE PA 17003 MONACA PA 15061

BIG SPRING TX 79720 #23 Boiler

BIG SPRING TX 79720 #24 Boiler

BIG SPRING TX 79720 Alky Hot Oil Heater

BIG SPRING TX 79720 Big Vacuum Heater

BIG SPRING TX 79720 Clay Tower Heater

BIG SPRING TX 79720 CO Boiler

BIG SPRING TX 79720 Crude Heater A

BIG SPRING TX 79720 Crude Heater B

# BIG SPRING TX 79720 Crude Heater D

BIG SPRING TX 79720 Diesel Charge Heater

BIG SPRING TX 79720 Diesel Stabilizer Reboiler

BIG SPRING TX 79720 East C8 Column Heater

BIG SPRING TX 79720 FCCU Air Heater

BIG SPRING TX 79720 FCCU Preheater

BIG SPRING TX 79720 Gas Oil HDS Charge Heater

BIG SPRING TX 79720 GTR Process Heater

BIG SPRING TX 79720 Horizontal Asphalt Box Heater

BIG SPRING TX 79720 LDH Charge Heater

BIG SPRING TX 79720 LSG Hydrogen Preheat Heater

BIG SPRING TX 79720 LSG Hydrogen Stripper Reboiler

BIG SPRING TX 79720 Naphtha HDS Charge Heater

BIG SPRING TX 79720 Naphtha HDS Depent Reboiler

BIG SPRING TX 79720 PDA Asphalt Heater

BIG SPRING TX 79720 PDA Gas Oil Heater

BIG SPRING TX 79720 PDA Tea Kettle Superheater

BIG SPRING TX 79720 PMA Hot Oil Heater

BIG SPRING TX 79720 Reformer #1 Reheat

BIG SPRING TX 79720 Reformer #2 Reheat

BIG SPRING TX 79720 Reformer #3 Reheat

BIG SPRING TX 79720 Reformer Charge Heater

BIG SPRING TX 79720 Reformer Depent Reboiler

# BIG SPRING TX 79720 Vertical Asphalt Box Heater

BIG SPRING TX 79720 West C8 Column Heater

BLAINE WA 98230 #1 Reformer Heater

BLAINE WA 98230 #2 DHDS Charge Heater

BLAINE WA 98230 #2 Reformer Heater

BLAINE WA 98230 #4 Boiler

BLAINE WA 98230 #5 Boiler

BLAINE WA 98230 #6 Boiler

BLAINE WA 98230 #7 Boiler

BLAINE WA 98230 1st Stage Fract Reboiler

BLAINE WA 98230 2nd Stage Fract Reboiler

BLAINE WA 98230 Coker #1 (North)

BLAINE WA 98230 Coker #2 (South)

BLAINE WA 98230 Crude Heater

BLAINE WA 98230 DHDS Charge Heater

BLAINE WA 98230 DHDS Stabilizer Reboiler

BLAINE WA 98230 H2 Plant #1 Furnace

BLAINE WA 98230 H2 Plant #2 Furnace

BLAINE WA 98230 IHT Heater

BLAINE WA 98230 Naphtha HDS Charge Heater

BLAINE WA 98230 Naphtha HDS Stripper Reboiler

BLAINE WA 98230 North Vacuum Heater

BLAINE WA 98230 R-1 Reaction Heater

# BLAINE WA 98230 R-4 Reaction Heater

BLAINE WA 98230 South Vacuum Heater

MOOREFIELD WV 26836 B1

MOOREFIELD WV 26836 B2 NEWCASTLE WY 82701

# Boiler 350 8500Wet Biomass Stoker/SlopedGrat e/Other

Boiler 312.5 700Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 600 1200Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 480 1650Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 1670 8400Coal FB Boiler 1.3 3000Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 108 8760Gas 1 - Metal Furnace N/A

Process Heater 136 8760Gas 1 - Metal Furnace N/A

Process Heater 112.6 8760Gas 1 - Metal Furnace N/A

Process Heater 205 8760Gas 1 - Metal Furnace N/A Boiler 50.2 8736Gas 1 N/A Boiler 50.2 8736Gas 1 N/A Boiler 50.2 8736Gas 1 N/A Boiler 50.2 8736Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 10 8760Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 10 8760Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 10 8760Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 10 8760Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 10 8760Gas 1 N/A

**N/A - area source of HAP emissions Classification**  **Design Capacity**

**(MMBtu/hr) Annual Hours** 

**of Operation Fuel Category**  **Combustor Design**

**N/A - no applicable combustion units on site**
**N/A - area source of HAP emissions**
**N/A - area source of HAP emissions**

# Boiler 10 8760Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 10 8760Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 43.75 7344Coal Stoker/SlopedGrat e/Other

Boiler 28.75 7344Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 37.5 7344Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 240 7321Coal PC

Boiler 240 7321Coal PC

Boiler 80 7321Heavy Liquid N/A

Boiler 80 7321Heavy Liquid N/A

Boiler 27 7321Heavy Liquid N/A

Boiler 27 7321Heavy Liquid N/A

Boiler 13 7321Heavy Liquid N/A

Boiler 14 7321Heavy Liquid N/A

Process Heater 22.5 8760Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 18.2 8760Gas 1 N/A

**N/A - area source of HAP emissions**

**Boiler shut down on May 7, 2011**
**Boiler shut down on May 7, 2011**
**Boiler shut down on May 7, 2011**

**N/A - area source of HAP emissions**

**N/A - area source of HAP emissions**

# Process Heater 84.72 8760Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 60.75 8760Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 60 8760Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 6.5 8760Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 32 8760Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 25.6 8760Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 18.6 8760Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 29.23 8760Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 56.92 8760Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 6.07 8760Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 240 8760Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 240 8760Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 240 8760Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 98 8760Light Liquid N/A Boiler 73.3 8736Light Liquid N/A Boiler 138 7321Coal PC Boiler 92.5 6198Gas 1 N/A Boiler 138 6198Gas 1 N/A

**N/A - area source of HAP emissions**
**N/A - area source of HAP emissions**

# Boiler 125 8568Coal Stoker/SlopedGrat e/Other

Boiler 37.5 500Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 125 500Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 125 8592Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 125 8592Gas 1 N/A Boiler 73.5 8760Gas 1 N/A Boiler 73.5 8760Gas 1 N/A Boiler 73.5 8760Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 28.7 8760Wet Biomass Stoker/SlopedGrat e/Other

Boiler 30.5 8568Heavy Liquid N/A

Boiler 30.5 8568Heavy Liquid N/A

Boiler 33.5 8568Heavy Liquid N/A

Boiler 15 8568Heavy Liquid N/A

Boiler 30.5 8568Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 242.6 8377Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 210.9 5383Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 11.64 8760Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 47.31 8760Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 14.84 8034Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 163.35 8760Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 101.23 8760Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 101.23 6072Gas 1 N/A

**N/A - area source of HAP emissions**

**N/A - area source of HAP emissions N/A - no applicable combustion units on site**  **N/A - area source of HAP emissions**

# Process Heater 100 8760Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 59 8376Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 21.11 8376Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 9.99 8046Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 2 147Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 63 8424Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 13.2 8136Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 9.9 8760Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 19.2 8760Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 18 8256Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 21 8424Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 15 8376Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 21.3 8448Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 38.25 8472Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 22.64 8760Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 13.8 8760Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 2.17 8760Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 4.5 8760Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 40.96 8496Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 62.9 8496Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 25.53 8496Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 46.58 8496Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 30.11 8376Gas 1 N/A

# Process Heater 10 8760Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 9.99 8046Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 1075 8760Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 35 8760Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 330 8760Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 216 8760Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 363 8760Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 363 8760Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 363 8760Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 198 8760Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 183 8760Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 190 8760Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 190 8760Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 720 8760Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 48 8760Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 56 8760Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 325 8760Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 325 8760Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 13 8760Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 110 8760Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 86 8760Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 77 8760Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 121 8760Gas 1 N/A

# Process Heater 79 8760Gas 1 N/A

Process Heater 207 8760Gas 1 N/A

Boiler 13.3 8760Dry Biomass Stoker/SlopedGrat e/Other

Boiler 14.4 8760Dry Biomass Stoker/SlopedGrat e/Other **N/A - area source of HAP emissions**

# Major or Area **Source of HAP Emissions?**  **Unit**

**Permanently Shut Down?**  **Test Report**

**Submitted?**

Major Source No No

Area Source No No

Area Source No No

No Major Source No No

Area Source No No

No Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

No Major Source No Yes No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No Yes Major Source No No Yes Major Source No No Yes Major Source No No Yes Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No **Low NOx Burners?**  **Facility Response**

# No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

Area Source No No

Major Source Yes No

Major Source Yes No

Major Source Yes No

No Area Source No Yes

No Area Source No No

No Area Source No No

Area Source No No

No Major Source No Yes

No Major Source No Yes

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

Area Source No No

Yes Major Source No Yes

Yes Major Source No Yes

# Yes Major Source No Yes

Yes Major Source No Yes

Yes Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

Area Source No No

Area Source No No No Major Source No Yes No Major Source No No No Major Source No Yes No Major Source No Yes No Major Source No No

# Area Source No No

No Major Source No Yes

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No No Major Source No No No Major Source No No No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

Area Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No Yes

Area Source No No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No Yes

No Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No Yes

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No Yes

Yes Major Source No Yes

# Yes Major Source No Yes

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No Yes

No Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No Yes

No Major Source No Yes

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No Yes

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

No Major Source No Yes

No Major Source No Yes

No Major Source No Yes

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No Yes

Yes Major Source No No

# No Major Source No No

No Major Source No Yes

No Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

No Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

# No Major Source No No

Yes Major Source No No

No Major Source No Yes

No Major Source No Yes

Area Source No No

# Notes on Operation Status

Boilers no longer in operation and no longer permitted to operate; no applicable combustion units on site.

No applicable combustion units have ever been in operation at this site. **Facility Response**

# Facility no longer combusts coal; all units combust natural

gas (with hydrogen and process gas as backup fuels).
Boiler shut down on May 7, 2011.
Boiler shut down on May 7, 2011.
Boiler shut down on May 7, 2011.

Facility submitted unit-level data and test report even though facility is an area source of HAP.

# All boilers on site have been decomissioned.

# Legal owner is Pfizer, Inc.

Boiler decomissioned in 2007. Coal-fired boiler decomissioned in 2002.

# Appendix C: Summary of Data Corrections and Additions from Reconsideration Petitions **Organization Comment Date**  **Affected Facility ID Affected Unit ID**  **Summary of Data Corrections or Additions**
HIChevronKapolei F-5103 Attachments included test report for filterable particulate matter emissions testing conducted in December, 2009. The emissions testing data in this report have been processed into the EPA ICR databases.
HIChevronKapolei F-5153 Attachments included test report for filterable particulate matter emissions testing conducted in December, 2009. The emissions testing data in this report have been processed into the EPA ICR databases.

HITesoro SG1102 Attachments included test report for metallic HAP and filterable particulate matter emissions testing conducted in December, 2010. The emissions testing data in this report have been processed into the EPA ICR databases.
Boiler No. 2 Attachments included additional filterable particulate matter emissions testing data from November, 2010.

These emissions testing data have been processed into the EPA ICR databases.
Boiler No. 3 Attachments included additional filterable particulate matter emissions testing data from November, 2010.

These emissions testing data have been processed into the EPA ICR databases.
Boiler No. 6 Attachments included additional filterable particulate matter emissions testing data from November, 2010.

These emissions testing data have been processed into the EPA ICR databases.
Boiler No. 1 Attachments included additional filterable particulate matter emissions testing data from December, 2010.

These emissions testing data have been processed into the EPA ICR databases.
Boiler No. 2 Attachments included additional filterable particulate matter emissions testing data from December, 2010.

These emissions testing data have been processed into the EPA ICR databases.
Boiler No. 3 Attachments included additional filterable particulate matter emissions testing data from December, 2010.

These emissions testing data have been processed into the EPA ICR databases.
Boiler No. 4 Attachments included additional filterable particulate matter emissions testing data from December, 2010.

These emissions testing data have been processed into the EPA ICR databases.

Boiler No. 5 Attachments included additional filterable particulate matter emissions testing data from December of 1994,

1995, 1996, 1997, and 2010. These emissions testing data have been processed into the EPA ICR databases.
Boiler No. 8 Attachments included additional filterable particulate matter emissions testing data from December, 2010.

These emissions testing data have been processed into the EPA ICR databases. N/A Attachments included additional bagasse fuel analysis data for metallic HAP sampling done in January, 2011.

These fuel sampling data have been processed into the EPA ICR databases.
Boiler No. 1 Attachments included additional filterable particulate matter emissions testing data from November, 2010.

These emissions testing data have been processed into the EPA ICR databases.
Boiler No. 2 Attachments included additional filterable particulate matter emissions testing data from November, 2010.

These emissions testing data have been processed into the EPA ICR databases.
Boiler No. 4 Attachments included additional filterable particulate matter emissions testing data from November, 2010.

These emissions testing data have been processed into the EPA ICR databases.
Boiler No. 7 Attachments included additional filterable particulate matter emissions testing data from November, 2010.

These emissions testing data have been processed into the EPA ICR databases.
Boiler No. 8 Attachments included additional filterable particulate matter emissions testing data from November, 2010.

These emissions testing data have been processed into the EPA ICR databases.
Boiler 1 Attachments included additional filterable particulate matter emissions testing data from August, 2010. These

emissions testing data have been processed into the EPA ICR databases.
Boiler 2 Attachments included additional filterable particulate matter emissions testing data from August, 2010. These

emissions testing data have been processed into the EPA ICR databases.
Boiler 3 Attachments included additional filterable particulate matter emissions testing data from August, 2010. These

emissions testing data have been processed into the EPA ICR databases. N/A Attachments included additional bagasse fuel analysis data for metallic HAP sampling done in August, 2010.

These fuel sampling data have been processed into the EPA ICR databases.
National Renderers Association (NRA) July 15, 2011 N/A N/A Comments included processed fats fuel sampling data for metallic HAP. However, the data could not be attributed to a facility. Thus, these additional data were not processed in the EPA ICR databases. American Petroleum Institute (API) & National Petrochemical and Refiners Association (NPRA) July 15, 2011

Florida Sugar Industry July 15, 2011 FLOsceolaFarms

FLSugarCaneGrowersCoop

FLUSSugarCorp

HIPuuneneSugarMill

Page 1 of 2

# Appendix C: Summary of Data Corrections and Additions from Reconsideration Petitions **Organization Comment Date**  **Affected Facility ID Affected Unit ID**  **Summary of Data Corrections or Additions** MNAndersonCorpBayport Boiler 11 EU620 Comments specified that this unit should be a suspension burner and not a stoker. This classification change was processed in the EPA ICR databases. MNAndersonCorpBayport Boiler 12 EU621 Comments specified that this unit should be a suspension burner and not a stoker. This classification change was processed in the EPA ICR databases. MNWeyerhaeuserIronton EU 001 - 4 Cell Furnace Comments specified that this unit should be a fuel cell and not a stoker. This classification change was

processed in the EPA ICR databases.
ORStimsonLumberForestGrove Boiler 1 Comments specified that this unit should be a pile burner and not a stoker. This classification change was processed in the EPA ICR databases.
ORStimsonLumberForestGrove Boiler 2 Comments specified that this unit should be a pile burner and not a stoker. This classification change was processed in the EPA ICR databases.
ORStimsonLumberForestGrove Boiler 3 Comments specified that this unit should be a pile burner and not a stoker. This classification change was processed in the EPA ICR databases.

MNGPDuluth EU33 Boiler #3 Comments specified that mercury emissions testing data from September, 2009 were reported erroneously. The test company did not include all of the non-detect fraction levels in the sum of mass from the analytical report. Updated mercury emission values for the three test runs were submitted. However, NCASI submitted emissions corrections for the same test in 2010, and the emission values were corrected then. The corrected values submitted by NCASI were different than those specified by RMA, but it was assumed that NCASI provided the more accurate emission values. Thus, this correction was not processed in the EPA ICR databases.

NYConEd59thStStationNewYork Boiler 118 Comments specified that mercury emissions testing data from August, 2009 were reported erroneously. The analytical laboratory failed to analyze all five fractions of the EPA Method 29 samples (only fractions 5b and 5c were sampled). This test was flagged in the EPA ICR databases and was not used in any analyses.
Comments also specified that dioxin/furan emissions testing data from August, 2009 were reported erroneously. Corrected total mass values were provided. These corrections were processed in the EPA ICR databases.

SCMilliken-Dewey D30 Comments specified that dioxin/furan emissions testing data from August, 2009 were reported erroneously. Corrected total mass values were provided. Combined with a review of dioxin/furan congener emissions done by EPA, the appropriate dioxin/furan emissions data were corrected in the EPA ICR databases. The corrected emissions match the values specified by RMA. Temple-Inland, Inc. July 15, 2011 GATempleInlandRome WF Facility submitted additional hourly CO continuous emissions monitoring (CEM) data spanning from July, 2009, to April, 2011. These additional data were processed into the EPA ICR databases. WVWeyerhaeuserBuckhannon 001-01 Facility submitted emissions testing report from August, 2010 that contained additional data for CO, NOx, SO2, THC, and PM. These additional data were processed into the EPA ICR databases. WVWeyerhaeuserBuckhannon 001-02 Facility submitted emissions testing report from August, 2010 that contained additional data for NOx, SO2, and THC. These additional data were processed into the EPA ICR databases. National Council for Air and Stream Improvement

(NCASI) July 15, 2011

Rubber Manufacturers Association (RMA) July 15, 2011

Weyerhaeuser Company July 14, 2011

Page 2 of 2

# Appendix D: Combustion Units Reclassified as Major Source Boilers from CISWI

**FacilityID UnitID**  **Classification Design**  **Capacity (MMBtu/hr)**  **Annual**

**Hours of Operation**  **Fuel**

**Category Combustor Design**  **Reason for Reclassification** CAChineseStation Unit 1 Boiler 370 8760Biomass FB Urban wood processed prior to combustion. CACovantaDelano Unit 1 Boiler 400 8760Biomass FB Urban wood processed prior to combustion. CACovantaDelano Unit 2 Boiler 315 8760Biomass FB Urban wood processed prior to combustion. CACovantaMendota Unit 1 Boiler 317 8760Biomass FB Urban wood processed prior to combustion. CAPacificOroville Boiler 1 Boiler 175 8760Biomass Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other C&D biomass processed prior to combustion. CAPacificOroville Boiler 2 Boiler 175 8760Biomass Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other C&D biomass processed prior to combustion. CAThermalEnergyDev BLR1 Boiler 70.52 8760Biomass Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other Urban wood processed prior to combustion. MEBoralex Boiler #1 Boiler 585.9 8256Biomass Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other C&D biomass processed prior to combustion. MIHillmanPower EUBoiler Boiler 300 8760Biomass Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other Process-derived fuels generated on-site. NYBlackRiverGen E00001 Boiler 201.25 8760Coal FB Metal wiring removed from TDF prior to combustion. NYBlackRiverGen E00002 Boiler 201.25 8760Coal FB Metal wiring removed from TDF prior to combustion. NYBlackRiverGen E00003 Boiler 201.25 8760Coal FB Metal wiring removed from TDF prior to combustion. PAKimberlyClarkChester Boiler #10 (ID 035) Boiler 975 800Coal FB Anthracite culm no longer classified as solid waste.

WAPortTownsendPaper #10 Power Boiler Boiler 1355.797143 8640Biomass Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other C&D biomass processed prior to combustion; process-derived fuels generated on-site.

Page 1 of 1

# Appendix E: Summary of Fuel Analysis Corrections Identified by ORCR
**FacilityID Potential Issue with Reported Fuel Analysis Data (Identified by**  **ORCR) Did Facility Respond to Clarification Request?**  **Actions Taken to Correct Data in EPA ICR Database**

ALCargill-Decatur Mercury (Hg) samples from bituminous coal were reported in units of mg/g. Compared to other mg/g data from other facilities, these data are orders of magnitude higher. Potentially should have been reported in units of mg/kg. No Assumed that units of measure should have beenreported as mg/kg; corrected units to mg/kg and restandardized to lb/MMBtu.

ALIPPineHill Cadmium (Cd) samples from bituminous coal were reported in units of mg/g. Data for all other metallic HAP were reported in units of mg/kg, but all are on the same order of magnitude. Potentially should have reported Cd data in units of mg/kg. Yes - specified that units of measure should be mg/kg instead of mg/g. Corrected units to mg/kg and re-standardized to lb/MMBtu.

MOIP&LMissouriCity Metallic HAP samples from bituminous coal were reported in units of mg/g. Compared to other mg/g data from other facilities, these data are orders of magnitude higher. Potentially should have been reported in units of mg/kg. Yes - specified that units of measure should be μg/g (or equivalent mg/kg)

. Corrected units toμg/g and re-standardized to lb/MMBtu.

MOIPLBlueValley Metallic HAP samples from bituminous coal were reported in units of mg/g. Compared to other mg/g data from other facilities, these data are orders of magnitude higher. Potentially should have been reported in units of mg/kg. Yes - specified that units of measure should be μg/g (or equivalent mg/kg)

. Corrected units toμg/g and re-standardized to lb/MMBtu.

NCCampLejeuneMCB Metallic HAP samples from bituminous coal were reported in units of mg/g. Compared to other mg/g data from other facilities, these data are orders of magnitude higher. Potentially should have been reported in units of mg/kg. Yes - specified that units of measure should be mg/kg instead of mg/g. Corrected units to mg/kg, however the values could not be re-standardized to lb/MMBtu due to a lack of HHV for the samples. Facility confirmed that no HHV data were available.

NCKapStone Metallic HAP samples from bituminous coal were reported in units of mg/g. Compared to other mg/g data from other facilities, these data are orders of magnitude higher. Potentially should have been reported in units of mg/kg. No Assumed that units of measure should have beenreported as mg/kg; corrected units to mg/kg and restandardized to lb/MMBtu.

NCNC_DukeUniversity_Durham Mercury (Hg) samples from bituminous coal were reported in units of mg/g. Compared to other mg/g data from other facilities, these data are orders of magnitude higher. Potentially should have been reported in units of mg/kg. Yes - specified that units of measure should be mg/kg instead of mg/g. Corrected units to mg/kg, however the values could not be re-standardized to lb/MMBtu due to a lack of HHV for the samples. Facility confirmed that no HHV data were available.

PAAppletonPapers Lead (Pb) samples from bituminous coal were reported in units of mg/g. Data for all other metallic HAP were reported in units of mg/kg, but all are on the same order of magnitude. Potentially should have reported Pb data in units of mg/kg. No Assumed that units of measure should have beenreported as mg/kg; corrected units to mg/kg and restandardized to lb/MMBtu.

Page 1 of 2

# Appendix E: Summary of Fuel Analysis Corrections Identified by ORCR
**FacilityID Potential Issue with Reported Fuel Analysis Data (Identified by**  **ORCR) Did Facility Respond to Clarification Request?**  **Actions Taken to Correct Data in EPA ICR Database**

PAHorseheadCorpMonaco Mercury (Hg) samples from sub-bituminous coal were reported in units of mg/g. Compared to other mg/g data from other facilities, these data are orders of magnitude higher. Potentially should have been reported in units of mg/kg. Yes - specified that units of measure should be mg/kg. Corrected units to mg/kg and re-standardized to lb/MMBtu.

Page 2 of 2

# Appendix F-1: Summary of Top 20 Percent Test Reports Requested
**Facility ID Unit ID**  **CO Test Date**  **HCl Test**

**Date Hg Test** 

**Date PM Test** 

**Date TSM8 Test** 

**Date Test Report** 

**Submitted? Notes**  ARGeorgiaPacificCrossett93 SN-WB2 Wood Boiler 8/8/2006 Yes ARLeolaLumberMill SN-01A 6/14/20066/14/2006 Yes Facility is now owned by West Fraser, Inc. ARLeolaLumberMill SN-01B 6/14/20066/14/2006 Yes Facility is now owned by West Fraser, Inc. AZCatalystPaperSnowflake Power Boiler #2 Coal 5/30/2007 Yes AZCatalystPaperSnowflake Power Boiler #2 Coal 8/8/2007 Yes CACovantaDelano Unit 1 4/21/2009 Yes CAPacificOroville Boiler 1 8/23/2005 Yes Determined to be an area source facility. CAPacificOroville Boiler 2 8/23/2005 Yes Determined to be an area source facility. CAThermalEnergyDev BLR1 5/31/2000 Yes FLGPHawthorne EU 001 Wood Fired Boiler 5/22/2007 Yes FLIPPensacola Power Boiler 4 / EU ID 37 3/7/2006 No GAGPMadisonPly 800 Wood Waste Boiler 6/19/2003 Yes Test report had previously been submitted. GAGPMadisonPly 800 Wood Waste Boiler 6/16/2006 Yes Test report had previously been submitted. GAGPMonticelloPlywood EU700 - Wood Waste Boiler 2/7/2007 Yes GAGPMonticelloPlywood EU700 - Wood Waste Boiler 2/7/2007 Yes GAGPMonticelloPlywood EU700 - Wood Waste Boiler 11/20/2008 Yes GAGPWarmSprings EU600 Wood Fuel Boiler 10/26/2004 No GAInternationalPaperAugustaMills PB3A 10/4/2005 Yes GAInternationalPaperAugustaMills PB3A 8/10/2007 Yes GAIPSavannah No. 13 Power Boiler - PB13 3/26/2002 Yes GAIPSavannah No. 13 Power Boiler - PB13 1/29/2003 Yes GAIPSavannah No. 13 Power Boiler - PB13 6/17/2004 Yes GAIPSavannah No. 13 Power Boiler - PB13 6/22/2006 Yes GAIPSavannah No. 13 Power Boiler - PB13 5/10/2007 Yes GATempleInlandRome PB4 2/27/2008 No E-mail failed to reach facility. GATempleInlandRome PB4 2/27/2008 No E-mail failed to reach facility. GATempleInlandRome WF 2/28/2008 No E-mail failed to reach facility. GATempleInlandRome WF 7/22/2008 No E-mail failed to reach facility. GATempleInlandRome WF 2/28/2008 No E-mail failed to reach facility. IAADMCornProcessingCR EU-530 11/20/2002 No IAMuscatinePowerandWater Unit 7 4/22/20044/22/2004 Yes IAMuscatinePowerandWater Unit 7 10/10/2006 Yes IDPotlatch PB-1 CE 7/20/2006 No IDPotlatch PB-2 Riley 7/27/2006 No IDTASCONampa Babcock and Wilcox (B&W) #1 12/4/2006 Yes IDTASCONampa Babcock and Wilcox (B&W) #2 12/4/2006 Yes ILBungeDanville CFB Boiler 7/20/2004 No ILRockIslandArsenal NBN 12602 (Boiler #1) 3/13/2007 Yes Submitted hard copy version of test report. LAGPPortHudson EQT0109 - No. 6 CFB Boiler 9/11/2007 Yes LAGPPortHudson EQT0109 - No. 6 CFB Boiler 12/18/2008 Yes LAGPPortHudson EQT0109 - No. 6 CFB Boiler 12/19/2008 Yes MENewPage-Rumford PB#5 38699 Yes MIHillmanPower EUBoiler 7/1/1998 Yes Determined to be an area source facility. MIHillmanPower EUBoiler 1/1/2003 Yes Determined to be an area source facility.

MILPCSagola TOH-Wood 2/5/1997 Yes Submitted hard copy version of test report in July, 2011.
MILPCSagola TOH-Wood 4/4/2000 Yes Submitted hard copy version of test report in July, 2011.

Page 1 of 3

# Appendix F-1: Summary of Top 20 Percent Test Reports Requested
**Facility ID Unit ID**  **CO Test Date**  **HCl Test**

**Date Hg Test** 

**Date PM Test** 

**Date TSM8 Test** 

**Date Test Report** 

**Submitted? Notes** 
MILPCSagola TOH-Wood 5/8/2002 Yes Submitted hard copy version of test report in July, 2011.
MILPCSagola TOH-Wood 3/2/2005 Yes Submitted hard copy version of test report in July, 2011. MITBSimonPowerPlant Unit 1 6/13/2007 Yes MITBSimonPowerPlant Unit 1 6/14/2007 Yes
MNHibbing Unit 1A 9/21/2004 Yes Submitted hard copy version of test report in September, 2011.

MNHibbing Unit 2A 9/22/2004 Yes Submitted hard copy version of test report in September, 2011. MNMinnesotaSoybeanProcessors Boiler 1 EU026 11/21/2006 Yes MNMinnesotaSoybeanProcessors Boiler 1 EU026 12/6/2006 Yes MNMinnesotaSoybeanProcessors Boiler 2 EU027 11/21/2006 Yes MNMinnesotaSoybeanProcessors Boiler 2 EU027 12/6/2006 Yes MSHoodWiggins AA-002 (Wood-Fired Boiler No. 2) 4/8/2003 Yes NCDomtar 66-25-2050 (No. 1 Package Boiler) Liquid Firing 6/4/2008 Yes Granted an excusal from test report request. NCHanesDyeWinstonSalem ES B01 3/21/2007 No E-mail failed to reach facility. NCHanesDyeWinstonSalem ES B02 3/21/2007 No E-mail failed to reach facility. NCLPRoaringRiver Boiler #2 10/13/2004 Yes Test report had previously been submitted. NCMCASCherryPoint CP-152-BOIL-03 2/28/2006 No NCTysonHarmony TYS-ES-21 9/25/2006 No NDCargillWestFargo Foster Wheeler Boiler (EU43) 8/3/2005 Yes NYMortonSalt EU01 10/25/2007 No OHAppletonIdeas Boiler 4 (B003) 1/31/2003 No E-mail failed to reach facility.

ORGeorgiaPacificWaunaMill EU35 - Fluidized Bed Boiler 4/27/2004 Yes Submitted test report on thumb drive sent by U.S. mail.

ORGeorgiaPacificWaunaMill EU35 - Fluidized Bed Boiler 3/15/2005 Yes Submitted test report on thumb drive sent by U.S. mail.

ORGeorgiaPacificWaunaMill EU35 - Fluidized Bed Boiler 3/27/2007 Yes Submitted test report on thumb drive sent by U.S. mail.

ORGeorgiaPacificWaunaMill EU35 - Fluidized Bed Boiler 3/20/2008 Yes Submitted test report on thumb drive sent by U.S. mail.

ORGeorgiaPacificWaunaMill EU35 - Fluidized Bed Boiler 3/17/2009 Yes Submitted test report on thumb drive sent by U.S. mail. ORRosboroSpringfield DV 01.2 7/31/2006 Yes PADomtarJohnsonburg #81 Coal Boiler 7/18/2007 Yes PADomtarJohnsonburg #82 Coal Boiler 7/18/2007 Yes PAKimberlyClarkChester Boiler #10 (ID 035) 9/1/2003 Yes Submitted hard copy version of test report. SCCogenSouth B001 - Main Boiler 11/25/200311/25/2003 11/25/2003 Yes SCCogenSouth B001 - Main Boiler 11/3/2005 11/3/2005 11/3/2005 Yes SCCogenSouth B001 - Main Boiler 11/7/2007 11/7/2007 11/7/2007 Yes SCCogenSouth B002 - Auxiliary Boiler #1 11/14/2006 Yes SCCogenSouth B002 - Auxiliary Boiler #1 11/30/2004 Yes SCCogenSouth B003 - Auxiliary Boiler #2 11/14/2006 Yes SCCogenSouth B003 - Auxiliary Boiler #2 11/30/2004 Yes SCCogenSouth B004 - Auxiliary Boiler #3 11/14/2006 Yes SCCogenSouth B004 - Auxiliary Boiler #3 11/30/2004 Yes SCInternationalPaperEastover No. 2 Power Boiler 7/26/2006 Yes

Page 2 of 3

# Appendix F-1: Summary of Top 20 Percent Test Reports Requested
**Facility ID Unit ID**  **CO Test Date**  **HCl Test**

**Date Hg Test** 

**Date PM Test** 

**Date TSM8 Test** 

**Date Test Report** 

**Submitted? Notes**  VASmurfitStoneWestpt PB08 11/8/2004 No E-mail failed to reach facility. VASmurfitStoneWestpt PB08 4/13/2005 No E-mail failed to reach facility. VAVirginiaPolytechnic Boiler 11 2/27/2007 Yes WANipponPaper #10 Package Boiler 37970 Yes WAWeyerhaeuserLongview No. 11 Hog Fuel Boiler 10/7/2008 Yes Test report had previously been submitted. WIAlgoma B03 8/6/1991 Yes Submitted hard copy version of test report. WIMilwaukeePowerPlant Boiler B21 6/12/2007 Yes WINewPage-WisconsinRapids Power Boiler 1 - B21 12/14/2005 Yes WINewPage-WisconsinRapids Power Boiler 2 - B20 9/18/2003 Yes

Page 3 of 3

## Appendix F-2: Summary of Findings from Late Test Report Review for Mercury Top Performers
**Facility ID Unit ID**  **Sample ID Test Date**  **Pollutant Test Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **90% Fuel Category**  **Note For Changes Made**

GAGPMonticelloPlywood EU700 - Wood Waste Boiler Sample #12/7/2007 Mercury (Hg)Method 5/29 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator /MDF Scraps/Plywood Sander Dust/Wood: Bark/Wood: Plywood, Particleboard (containing glues or resins)/ Solid Late review of test report showed that not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Removed from floor analysis but still in baseline analysis given time constraints.

GAGPMonticelloPlywood EU700 - Wood Waste Boiler Sample #22/7/2007 Mercury (Hg)Method 5/29 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator /MDF Scraps/Plywood Sander Dust/Wood: Bark/Wood: Plywood, Particleboard (containing glues or resins)/ Solid Late review of test report showed that not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Removed from floor analysis but still in baseline analysis given time constraints.

GAGPMonticelloPlywood EU700 - Wood Waste Boiler Sample #32/7/2007 Mercury (Hg)Method 5/29 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator /MDF Scraps/Plywood Sander Dust/Wood: Bark/Wood: Plywood, Particleboard (containing glues or resins)/ Solid Late review of test report showed that not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Removed from floor analysis but still in baseline analysis given time constraints.

IAUofIowa EP7 Boiler 11 Sample #12/22/2006 Mercury (Hg)Method 29 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter /Biomass/Coal: Bituminous/ Solid Late review of test report shows not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Data removed from floor analysis but not from baseline analysis given time constraints

IAUofIowa EP7 Boiler 11 Sample #22/23/2006 Mercury (Hg)Method 29 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter /Biomass/Coal: Bituminous/ Solid Late review of test report shows not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Data removed from floor analysis but not from baseline analysis given time constraints

IAUofIowa EP7 Boiler 11 Sample #32/23/2006 Mercury (Hg)Method 29 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter /Biomass/Coal: Bituminous/ Solid Late review of test report shows not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Data removed from floor analysis but not from baseline analysis given time constraints

ILPolyOne B1 Sample #111/14/2006Mercury (Hg) Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid Late test report review replaced reported average with the actual data for the 3 test runs. Test runs included in floor analysis but not baseline analysis given time constraints

ILPolyOne B1 Sample #211/14/2006Mercury (Hg) Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid Late test report review replaced reported average with the actual data for the 3 test runs. Test runs included in floor analysis but not baseline analysis given time constraints

ILPolyOne B1 Sample #311/14/2006Mercury (Hg) Cyclone: Single/Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid Late test report review replaced reported average with the actual data for the 3 test runs. Test runs included in floor analysis but not baseline analysis given time constraints

MINeenahPaperMI Boiler 1 Sample #17/25/2006 Mercury (Hg)EPA Method 29 Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid late review of test report shows that not all 5 fractions were analyzed; removed from floor analysis but is still in baseline analysis given time constraints

MINeenahPaperMI Boiler 1 Sample #27/25/2006 Mercury (Hg)EPA Method 29 Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid late review of test report shows that not all 5 fractions were analyzed; removed from floor analysis but is still in baseline analysis given time constraints

MINeenahPaperMI Boiler 1 Sample #37/25/2006 Mercury (Hg)EPA Method 29 Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid late review of test report shows that not all 5 fractions were analyzed; removed from floor analysis but is still in baseline analysis given time constraints

MINeenahPaperMI Boiler 1 Sample #18/1/2006 Mercury (Hg)EPA Method 29 Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid late review of test report shows that not all 5 fractions were analyzed; removed from floor analysis but is still in baseline analysis given time constraints

MINeenahPaperMI Boiler 1 Sample #28/1/2006 Mercury (Hg)EPA Method 29 Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid late review of test report shows that not all 5 fractions were analyzed; removed from floor analysis but is still in baseline analysis given time constraints

MINeenahPaperMI Boiler 1 Sample #38/1/2006 Mercury (Hg)EPA Method 29 Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid late review of test report shows that not all 5 fractions were analyzed; removed from floor analysis but is still in baseline analysis given time constraints

MINeenahPaperMI Boiler 1 Sample #18/2/2006 Mercury (Hg)EPA Method 29 Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid late review of test report shows that not all 5 fractions were analyzed; removed from floor analysis but is still in baseline analysis given time constraints

MINeenahPaperMI Boiler 1 Sample #28/2/2006 Mercury (Hg)EPA Method 29 Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid late review of test report shows that not all 5 fractions were analyzed; removed from floor analysis but is still in baseline analysis given time constraints

MINeenahPaperMI Boiler 1 Sample #38/2/2006 Mercury (Hg)EPA Method 29 Fabric Filter /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid late review of test report shows that not all 5 fractions were analyzed; removed from floor analysis but is still in baseline analysis given time constraints

MITBSimonPowerPlant Unit 1 Sample #16/14/2007 Mercury (Hg)Method 29 Fabric Filter/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid Late review of test report showed incorrect use of ND data, values have been updated. Updated values used in floor analysis but not in baseline analysis given time constraints

MITBSimonPowerPlant Unit 1 Sample #26/14/2007 Mercury (Hg)Method 29 Fabric Filter/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid Late review of test report showed incorrect use of ND data, values have been updated. Updated values used in floor analysis but not in baseline analysis given time constraints

MITBSimonPowerPlant Unit 1 Sample #36/14/2007 Mercury (Hg)Method 29 Fabric Filter/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid Late review of test report showed incorrect use of ND data, values have been updated. Updated values used in floor analysis but not in baseline analysis given time constraints

MITBSimonPowerPlant Unit 1 Sample #16/13/2007 Mercury (Hg)Method 29 Fabric Filter/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid 8/24/11 - Review of test report showed Hg fractions were treated improperly--recalculated values amended in database; late review of test report showed that previously-updated values were also incorrect; updated values added. Updated values used

MITBSimonPowerPlant Unit 1 Sample #26/13/2007 Mercury (Hg)Method 29 Fabric Filter/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid 8/24/11 - Review of test report showed Hg fractions were treated improperly--recalculated values amended in database; late review of test report showed that previously-updated values were also incorrect; updated values added. Updated values used

MITBSimonPowerPlant Unit 1 Sample #36/15/2007 Mercury (Hg)Method 29 Fabric Filter/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid 8/24/11 - Review of test report showed Hg fractions were treated improperly--recalculated values amended in database; late review of test report showed that previously-updated values were also incorrect; updated values added. Updated values used

Page 1 of 3

## Appendix F-2: Summary of Findings from Late Test Report Review for Mercury Top Performers
**Facility ID Unit ID**  **Sample ID Test Date**  **Pollutant Test Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **90% Fuel Category**  **Note For Changes Made**

MNDESPHansONyman EU007 Sample #13/7/2007 Mercury (Hg)EPA Method 29 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Natural gas/Wood: Unadulterated Timber/ Solid Late review of test report showed that not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Removed from floor analysis but still in baseline analysis given time constraints

MNDESPHansONyman EU007 Sample #23/7/2007 Mercury (Hg)EPA Method 29 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Natural gas/Wood: Unadulterated Timber/ Solid Late review of test report showed that not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Removed from floor analysis but still in baseline analysis given time constraints

MNDESPHansONyman EU007 Sample #33/7/2007 Mercury (Hg)EPA Method 29 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Natural gas/Wood: Unadulterated Timber/ Solid Late review of test report showed that not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Removed from floor analysis but still in baseline analysis given time constraints

MNDESPHansONyman EU007 Sample #13/6/2007 Mercury (Hg)EPA Method 29 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Natural gas/Wood: Unadulterated Timber/ Solid Late review of test report showed that not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Removed from floor analysis but still in baseline analysis given time constraints

MNDESPHansONyman EU007 Sample #23/6/2007 Mercury (Hg)EPA Method 29 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Natural gas/Wood: Unadulterated Timber/ Solid Late review of test report showed that not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Removed from floor analysis but still in baseline analysis given time constraints

MNDESPHansONyman EU007 Sample #33/6/2007 Mercury (Hg)EPA Method 29 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator/Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (NH3 Or Urea Injection) (SNCR) /Natural gas/Wood: Unadulterated Timber/ Solid Late review of test report showed that not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Removed from floor analysis but still in baseline analysis given time constraints

NCGPRoxboro ES-1 Wood fired Boiler Sample #17/14/2004 Mercury (Hg)EPA method 29 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone) /Wood: Unadulterated Lumber/ Solid Late review of test report showed that not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Removed from floor analysis but still in baseline analysis given time constraints.

NCGPRoxboro ES-1 Wood fired Boiler Sample #27/14/2004 Mercury (Hg)EPA method 29 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone) /Wood: Unadulterated Lumber/ Solid Late review of test report showed that not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Removed from floor analysis but still in baseline analysis given time constraints.

NCGPRoxboro ES-1 Wood fired Boiler Sample #37/14/2004 Mercury (Hg)EPA method 29 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone) /Wood: Unadulterated Lumber/ Solid Late review of test report showed that not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Removed from floor analysis but still in baseline analysis given time constraints.

OHAppletonIdeas Boiler 4 (B003) Sample #11/31/2003 Mercury (Hg)USEPA Reference Method 29 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid Late review of test report showed that not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Removed from floor analysis but still in baseline analysis given time constraints.

OHAppletonIdeas Boiler 4 (B003) Sample #21/31/2003 Mercury (Hg)USEPA Reference Method 29 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid Late review of test report showed that not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Removed from floor analysis but still in baseline analysis given time constraints.

OHAppletonIdeas Boiler 4 (B003) Sample #31/31/2003 Mercury (Hg)USEPA Reference Method 29 Cyclone: Multiple (Multiclone)/Electrostatic Precipitator /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid Late review of test report showed that not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Removed from floor analysis but still in baseline analysis given time constraints.

OKGPMuskogeeMill B-3 Sample #15/20/2003 Mercury (Hg)Ontario Hydro Method 13 Fabric Filter /Coal: Sub-bituminous/ Solid Late review of test report showed that not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Removed from floor analysis but still in baseline analysis given time constraints.

OKGPMuskogeeMill B-3 Sample #25/20/2003 Mercury (Hg)Ontario Hydro Method 13 Fabric Filter /Coal: Sub-bituminous/ Solid Late review of test report showed that not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Removed from floor analysis but still in baseline analysis given time constraints.

OKGPMuskogeeMill B-3 Sample #35/20/2003 Mercury (Hg)Ontario Hydro Method 13 Fabric Filter /Coal: Sub-bituminous/ Solid Late review of test report showed that not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Removed from floor analysis but still in baseline analysis given time constraints.

VADukeEnergyNarrows Boiler #2 Sample #14/15/2004 Mercury (Hg)Method 29 Electrostatic Precipitator /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid Late review of test report shows that non-detect portions were incorrectly treated as zero; corrected values entered. Updated values used in floor analysis but old values used in baseline analysis given time constraints. Test date also updated.

VADukeEnergyNarrows Boiler #2 Sample #24/15/2004 Mercury (Hg)Method 29 Electrostatic Precipitator /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid Late review of test report shows that non-detect portions were incorrectly treated as zero; corrected values entered. Updated values used in floor analysis but old values used in baseline analysis given time constraints. Test date also updated.

VADukeEnergyNarrows Boiler #2 Sample #34/15/2004 Mercury (Hg)Method 29 Electrostatic Precipitator /Coal: Bituminous/ Solid Late review of test report shows that non-detect portions were incorrectly treated as zero; corrected values entered. Updated values used in floor analysis but old values used in baseline analysis given time constraints. Test date also updated.

WIGPGreenBay2818 B29 - Fluidized Bed Boiler #9 Sample #110/27/1992Mercury (Hg)EPA Method 29 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter /Petroleum Coke/ Solid 6/28/10 - Facility submitted fuel corrections for the unit, which burns pet coke and not coke oven gas; Late review of test report showed that not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Removed from floor analysis but still in baseline analysis given ti

WIGPGreenBay2818 B29 - Fluidized Bed Boiler #9 Sample #210/27/1992Mercury (Hg)EPA Method 29 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter /Petroleum Coke/ Solid 6/28/10 - Facility submitted fuel corrections for the unit, which burns pet coke and not coke oven gas; Late review of test report showed that not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Removed from floor analysis but still in baseline analysis given ti

Page 2 of 3

## Appendix F-2: Summary of Findings from Late Test Report Review for Mercury Top Performers
**Facility ID Unit ID**  **Sample ID Test Date**  **Pollutant Test Method**  **Cleaned Control Device Fuel**  **90% Fuel Category**  **Note For Changes Made**

WIGPGreenBay2818 B29 - Fluidized Bed Boiler #9 Sample #310/27/1992Mercury (Hg)EPA Method 29 Dry Limestone Injection/Fabric Filter /Petroleum Coke/ Solid 6/28/10 - Facility submitted fuel corrections for the unit, which burns pet coke and not coke oven gas; Late review of test report showed that not all 5 fractions were analyzed. Removed from floor analysis but still in baseline analysis given ti

Page 3 of 3