alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Subchapter C of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter C appear by Amdt. 381, 65 FR 64586, Oct. 30, 2000.

§ 283.29 Scheduling conference. ( a ) *Time and place.* The ALJ shall direct the parties or their counsel to attend a scheduling conference following the filing of a notice of appeal pursuant to § 283.25. The scheduling conference shall be held at the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC. Reasonable notice of the time and place of the scheduling conference shall be given. The ALJ may order each of the parties to furnish at the scheduling conference the following: ( 1 ) An outline of the appeal or defense;
( 2 ) The legal theories upon which the party will rely;
( 3 ) Copies of or a list of documents that the party anticipates relying upon;
( b ) *Procedures.* The ALJ shall not order any of the foregoing procedures that a party can show are inappropriate or unwarranted under the circumstances of the particular appeal.
( c ) *Scheduling conference.* At the scheduling conference, the following matters shall be considered: ( 1 ) The simplification of issues;
( 2 ) The necessity of amendments to pleadings;
( 3 ) Stipulations of facts and of the authenticity, accuracy, and admissibility of documents;
( 4 ) Negotiation, compromise, or settlement of issues;
( 5 ) The exchange of copies of proposed exhibits;
( 6 ) The nature of and the date by which discovery, as provided in § 283.28, must be completed;
( 7 ) The identification of documents or matters of which official notice may be requested;
( 8 ) A schedule to be followed by the parties for the filing of cross-motions for summary judgment and completion of other actions decided at the conference; and
( 9 ) Such other matters as may expedite and aid in the disposition of the appeal.
( d ) *Reporting.* A scheduling conference will not be stenographically reported unless so directed by the ALJ.
( e ) *Attendance at scheduling conference.* In the event the ALJ concludes that personal attendance by the ALJ and the parties or counsel at a scheduling conference is unwarranted or impractical, but decides that a conference would expedite the appeal, the ALJ may conduct such conference by telephone.
( f ) *Order.* Actions taken as a result of a conference shall be reduced to an appropriate written order, unless the ALJ concludes that a stenographic report shall suffice.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

DAVID P. CAULDER,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 4:02CV396-SPM/AK

DOUGLAS S. LYONS,

Defendant.

 /

O R D E R

This case has been remanded to the undersigned after consideration of

Defendants’ summary judgment motions and adoption of the report and

recommendation that all the claims, except those against Douglas Lyons, be dismissed.

(Doc. 52). The Court realizes that the parties may wish to conduct further discovery

prior to proceeding to an evidentiary hearing or trial. Thus, the parties will be given an

opportunity to file motions showing good cause to engage in additional discovery and

detailing the nature and scope of any discovery they deem necessary. In showing good

cause, such a motion must clearly demonstrate that there is a need for the materials

sought, that the materials are relevant to developing material issues not already

provided, that the information is not otherwise available to the party, and the discovery

is necessary to provide a full and fair hearing on the merits. Any proposed discovery

requests should be attached to the motion.

Accordingly, it is 

Case 4:02-cv-00396-SPM-AK Document 53 Filed 06/01/05 Page 1 of 2
2

ORDERED:

The parties shall have until June 24, 2005, to file motions detailing the scope and

nature of any further discovery necessary, and showing good cause for a need to

conduct such discovery. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 1st day of June, 2005.

s/ A. KORNBLUM 

ALLAN KORNBLUM 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 4:02-cv-00396-SPM-AK Document 53 Filed 06/01/05 Page 2 of 2
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2450 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to limit the number of local wage 

areas allowable within a General Schedule pay locality. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 20, 2013 

Mr. CARTWRIGHT (for himself, Mr. FATTAH, Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania, Ms. 

SCHWARTZ, and Mr. MARINO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to limit the number 

of local wage areas allowable within a General Schedule 

pay locality. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Locality Pay Equity 

5 Act’’. 


ebenthall on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2450 IH

1 SEC. 2. LIMITING THE NUMBER OF LOCAL WAGE AREAS DE2 FINED WITHIN A GENERAL SCHEDULE PAY 

3 LOCALITY. 

4 (a) LOCAL WAGE AREA LIMITATION.—Section 

5 5343(a) of title 5, United States Code, is amended— 

6 (1) in paragraph (1)(B)(i), by striking ‘‘(but 

7 such’’ and all that follows through ‘‘are employed)’’; 

8 (2) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘and’’ after 

9 the semicolon; 

10 (3) in paragraph (5), by striking the period 

11 after ‘‘Islands’’ and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

12 (4) by adding at the end the following: 

13 ‘‘(6) the Office of Personnel Management shall 

14 define not more than 1 local wage area within a pay 

15 locality, except that this paragraph shall not apply 

16 to the pay locality designated as ‘Rest of United 

17 States’.’’. 

18 (b) PAY LOCALITY DEFINED.—Section 5342(a) of 

19 title 5, United States Code, is amended— 

20 (1) in paragraph (2)(C), by striking ‘‘and’’ 

21 after the semicolon; 

22 (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period 

23 after ‘‘employee’’ and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

24 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

25 ‘‘(4) ‘pay locality’ has the same meaning as is 

26 given such term in section 5302(5).’’. 


ebenthall on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2450 IH

1 SEC. 3. REGULATIONS. 

2 The Director of the Office of Personnel Management 

3 shall prescribe any regulations necessary to carry out the 

4 purpose of this Act, including regulations to ensure that 

5 the enactment of this Act shall not have the effect of re6 ducing any rate of basic pay payable to any individual who 

7 is serving as a prevailing rate employee (as defined by sec8 tion 5342(a)(2) of title 5, United States Code). 

9 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

10 This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall 

11 take effect at the start of the first full pay period begin12 ning at least 180 days after the date of enactment of this 

13 Act. 

Æ 


ebenthall on DSK3TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
----

**EXHIBIT 13.1**

**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE****SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002***

 In connection with the annual report of International Gemini  Technology Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending  December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the  date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward Dolejsi, President and CEO of  the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant  to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 (1) the Report containing the financial statements of the  Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations  of the Company. 

Date: March 29, 2004

/s/ Edward Dolejsi   Edward Dolejsi   President and CEO 

*****A signed original of this written statement required  by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the  Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff  upon request. 

----
MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

98-449.

#### State ex rel. LTV Steel Co. v. Conrad.

In Mandamus and Procedendo. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for writs of mandamus and procedendo. Upon consideration of the joint application for dismissal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

Nos. 00-1461

00-1491

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v.

PEDRO LUIS TEJADA,

Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA

The opinion of the court published on June 27, 2001, is

amended as follows:

One page 7, on the second line following the block quote,

insert after "We acknowledge" the words "counsel’s argument."
Possible dates for lunch with
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification of CFO Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of KapStone Paper andPackaging Corporation for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Andrea K.Tarbox, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of KapStone Paper andPackaging Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation.

 
| Dated: November 4,  2009 |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
|                          |   |
|                          | By:    | /s/ Andrea K. Tarbox |
|                          |   | Andrea K. Tarbox |
|                          |   | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----
#### § 29.3626 Rule 25.

Tobacco in strip form which otherwise meets the specifications of a grade shall be treated as a subgrade by placing the special factor “S” preceding the grademark.

[49 FR 16759, Apr. 20, 1984]
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20004-2595  p202 624-2500  f202 628-5116

Crowell & Moring LLP  www.crowell.com  Washington, DC  New York  San Francisco  Los Angeles  Orange County  Anchorage  London  Brussels

Steven J. Seiden

(202) 624-2609

sseiden@crowell.com

February 5, 2015

VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL

Mr. Paul Gretch

Director

Office of International Aviation

U.S. Department of Transportation

Room W86-316

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Polling Results for Joint Application of United Airlines, Inc. and SkyWest 

Airlines Inc. for Exemption and Designations (Houston-Acapulco/Huatulco, Mexico), 

Dockets DOT-OST-2015-0016 and DOT-OST-2015-0017

Dear Mr. Gretch:

We have polled and received non-objections from each of the carriers on the attached 

service list for the above-referenced United1and SkyWest (d/b/a United Express) Joint 

Application. Prompt approval is requested so that United and SkyWest can secure foreign 

authority, make final operating plans and begin marketing the Houston-Acapulco/Huatulco

flights well in advance of operations, which they plan to commence on or about July 2, 2015, 

provided all necessary approvals have been secured.

Respectfully submitted,

Steven J. Seiden

Counsel for

United Airlines, Inc. and

SkyWest Airlines, Inc.

cc: Robert Finamore

Brian Hedberg

Brett Kruger

All Parties on the attached Service List

 

1

 Common names are used for airlines. 
Crowell & Moring LLP  www.crowell.com  Washington, DC  New York  San Francisco  Los Angeles  Orange County  Anchorage  London  Brussels

SERVICE LIST

robert.wirick@aa.com

howard.kass@aa.com

nssparks@fedex.com

gbleopard@fedex.com

dheffernan@cozen.com

jeremy.ross@alaskaair.com

robert.land@jetblue.com

jhill@cooley.com

perkmann@cooley.com

dkirstein@yklaw.com

jyoung@yklaw.com

bob.kneisley@wnco.com

leslie.abbott@wnco.com

matwood@cozen.com

anita.mosner@hklaw.com

jennifer.nowak@hklaw.com

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

chris.walker@delta.com

robert.cohn@hoganlovells.com

patrick.rizzi@hoganlovells.com

thomas.ting@suncountry.com

john.fredericksen@suncountry.com

john.varley@virginamerica.com

barbara.russell@virginamerica.com

dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil

john.s.duncan@faa.gov

englets@state.gov
120 STAT. 298 PUBLIC LAW 109–190—MAR. 20, 2006

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3256:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:

Vol. 151 (2005): Oct. 25, considered and passed House.

Vol. 152 (2006): Mar. 3, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–190

109th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3038 West

Liberty Avenue in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Congressman James Grove

Fulton Memorial Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

3038 West Liberty in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, shall be known

and designated as the ‘‘Congressman James Grove Fulton Memorial

Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Congressman

James Grove Fulton Memorial Post Office Building’’.

Approved March 20, 2006.

Mar. 20, 2006

[H.R. 3256]
Order entered September 26, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01497-CR

MICHAEL D'ANGELO MASON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 199-80929-10

ORDER

The Court GRANTS appellant’s September 24, 2013 motion for extension of time to file 

appellant’s brief.

We ORDER the Clerk of the Court to file the brief tendered as of the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

KEENAN RANDALL STACKS,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 3:19-cv-3541-LC-MJF

MARK S. INCH,

Respondent.

/

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report

and Recommendation dated April 14, 2021. (Doc. 15). The parties were furnished

a copy of the Report and Recommendation and were afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No

objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I conclude that it

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 15), is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.

Page 1 of 2
2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. 1), challenging the

judgment of conviction and sentence in State of Florida v. Keenan Randall

Stacks, Okaloosa County Circuit Court Case No. 2013-CF-1485, is

DENIED.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

4. The clerk of court shall close this case file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 21st day of May, 2021.

 s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

I, Bertrand F. Cambou, certify that:

1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Spansion Inc. (the Company);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Companys other
certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;

c)
disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter (the Companys fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The
Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over
financial reporting.



|                  |  |                                                         
|----------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 8, 2006 |  | /s/ Bertrand F. Cambou                                  
|                  |  | Bertrand F. Cambou President and Chief Executive Officer
H. R. 2383 

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and thirteen 

An Act 

To designate the new Interstate Route 70 bridge over the Mississippi River connecting St. Louis, Missouri, and southwestern Illinois as the ‘‘Stan Musial Veterans 

Memorial Bridge’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. STAN MUSIAL VETERANS MEMORIAL BRIDGE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The new Interstate Route 70 bridge over 

the Mississippi River that connects St. Louis, Missouri, to southwestern Illinois shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Stan Musial 

Veterans Memorial Bridge’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the bridge 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Stan Musial Veterans Memorial Bridge’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
#### The State ex rel. RMI Titanium Company, Appellee, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio; Williams, Appellant.

[Cite as *State ex rel. RMI Titanium Co. v. Indus. Comm.*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 546.]

(No. 98-96

Submitted September 15, 1998

Decided November 10, 1998.)

*Jane P. Wilson & Associates Co., L.P.A.,*and *Jane P. Wilson,*for appellee.

*Green, Haines, Sgambati, Murphy & Macota Co., L.P.A., Ronald E. Slipski*and *Steven L. Paulson,*for appellant.

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the order of the Industrial Commission is reinstated.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting. I would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., and Cook, J., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.
Searched for **https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/ES-05-11098.pdf**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/ES-05-11098.pdf**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
39–008 

108TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 108–764 

WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(a) OF RULE XIII 

WITH RESPECT TO THE SAME DAY CONSIDERATION OF 

CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED BY THE RULES 

COMMITTEE 

OCTOBER 8 (legislative day, OCTOBER 7), 2004.—Referred to the House Calendar and 

ordered to be printed 

Mrs. MYRICK, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 832] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 832, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives clause 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring a twothirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is reported from 

the Rules Committee) against certain resolutions reported from the 

Rules Committee. The rule applies the waiver to any special rule 

reported on the legislative day of Friday, October 8, 2004, providing 

for consideration or disposition of a conference report to accompany 

the bill (H.R. 4837) making appropriations for military construction, family housing, and base realignment and closure for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2005, 

and for other purposes. 

RESOLUTION

Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a 

two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules 

on the same day it is presented to the House is waived with respect 

to any resolution reported on the legislative day of October 8, 2004, 

providing for consideration or disposition of a conference report to 

accompany the bill (H.R. 4837) making appropriations for military 

construction, family housing, and base realignment and closure for 

2 

the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 

2005, and for other purposes. 

Æ