alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>

                            NEWS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                                  2 PARK AVENUE
                            NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10016



                                                           As of January 1, 2003


D.H. Blair Investment Banking Corp.
44 Wall Street
New York, NY  10005

Attention: Mr. J. Morton Davis

Dear Morty:

         As we discussed, I am writing to confirm our understanding that the
maturity date of certain Promissory Note, dated March 7, 2001, in the principal
amount of $200,000 of News Communications, Inc. to the order of D.H. Blair
Investment Banking Corp. is extended until June 1, 2003; provided, however that
the principal balance and accrued interest on the note shall be prepaid upon the
sale by News Communications of the stock or assets of its Dan's Papers
subsidiaries to the extent that the cash proceeds from such transactions equal
or exceed $1,000,000.

         Please acknowledge your acceptance of the foregoing by signing where
indicated below and returning the same to me. Thank you for your attention and
continued support.

                                        NEWS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.


                                        By: /s/ James A. Finkelstein
                                            ------------------------------
                                            Name:    James A. Finkelstein
                                            Title:   President


D.H. Blair Investment Banking Corp.



By: /s/ J. Morton Davis
------------------------------------
Name:  J. Morton Davis
Title:  Chairman








                                      -1-
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM
BONNEVILLE PACIFIC  CORPORATION'S  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                             U.S. Dollar       
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.00
<CASH>                                         16,018
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  6,255
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    65
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               812
<PP&E>                                         42,510
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (26,991)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 46,614
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          72
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     28,263
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   46,614
<SALES>                                        26,459
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               26,459
<CGS>                                          31,705
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  31,705
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             6,541
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,865)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,865)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                23,681
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   20,316
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  5.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  5.60
        


</TABLE>
#### § 29.18 Person.

Individual, association, partnership, or corporation.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
128559 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 128559 COA: 258892 Oakland CC: 94-135060-FH MARK IVAN RICHARDSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the April 7, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

p1024 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2005

Clerk
**Exhibit 23**

 

# **Consent of Independent Registered Public AccountingFirm**

# ** **

The Board of Directorsand Shareholders

Trans World EntertainmentCorporation:

 

We consent toincorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 33-14572, 33-40399,33-51094, 33-51516, 33-59319, 333-75231, 333-81685, 333-101532, and 333-128210)on Form S-8 pertaining to the Trans World Music Corp. 1986 Incentive andNon-Qualified Stock Option Plan, the Trans World Music Corp. 1990 Stock OptionPlan for Non-Employee Directors, the Trans World Entertainment Corp. 1994 StockOption Plan, the Camelot Music Holdings, Inc. 1998 Stock Option Plan, theCamelot Music Holdings, Inc. Outside Directors Stock Option Plan, theTrans World Entertainment Corp. 1998 Stock Option Plan, the Trans WorldEntertainment Corp. 1999 Stock Option Plan, the Trans World EntertainmentCorporation 2002 Stock Option Plan, and the Trans World EntertainmentCorporation 2005 Long Term Incentive and Share Award Plan of our reports dated April 13,2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Trans WorldEntertainment Corporation and subsidiaries as of January 28, 2006, and January 29,2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the fiscalyears in the three-year period ended January 28, 2006, management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting asof January 28, 2006 and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting as of January 28, 2006 which reports appear in the Annual Reporton Form 10-K of Trans World Entertainment Corporation and subsidiaries forthe fiscal year ended January 28, 2006.

 

Our report dated April 13,2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Trans WorldEntertainment Corporation and subsidiaries as of January 28, 2006, and January 29,2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the fiscalyears in the three-year period ended January 28, 2006, contains anexplanatory paragraph that states that the Company changed its method ofaccounting for conditional asset retirement obligations associated withoperating leases effective January 28, 2006.

 

 

Albany, New York

April 13, 2006

 

----
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

vs. Case No: 3:98cr126/LAC 

MICHAEL BLANKENSHIP

ORDER

The defendant has filed a notice of appeal and request for a certificate of

appealability. (Doc. 247). He seeks to appeal this court’s order dated November 14, 2006

denying his omnibus motion for relief from operation of order/judgment denying petitioner’s

motion under title 28 U.S.C. § 2255, pursuant to Rule 60(b)(5) and Rule 60(b)(6), and its

December 16, 2006 denial of his motion for reconsideration. (Doc. 241, 242, 243, 244 &

245). Unless a certificate of appealability is issued, the defendant may not take an appeal

from the final order denying Section 2255 relief. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(1)(B). Appeal

of denial of Rule 60(b) motion requires certificate of appealability. Gonzalez v. Secretary

of Department of Corrections, 317 F.3d 1308, 1312 (11th Cir. 2003). A COA should not

issue in the appeal from the denial of a Rule 60(b) motion in a habeas case unless the

petitioner shows, at a minimum, that it is debatable among jurists of reason whether the

district court abused its discretion. See Mobley v. Head, 306 F.3d 1096, 1097 (11th Cir.

2002) (“This Court reviews a denial of a 60(b) motion for an abuse of discretion.”).

Because the defendant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right, his request for a certificate of appealability is DENIED. 

Case 3:98-cr-00126-LC-MD Document 252 Filed 03/08/07 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 3:98cr126/LAC

Defendant has also filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc.

451). Because the court finds that this appeal is not taken in good faith, and that

defendant is not otherwise entitled to so proceed, Fed.R.App.P. 24(a)(3), he shall pay the

$455.00 appellate filing fee within thirty days.

DONE AND ORDERED this 8th day of March, 2007.

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:98-cr-00126-LC-MD Document 252 Filed 03/08/07 Page 2 of 2
### REASON FOR ISSUE: To revise the task interval for discard task 52 − 11 − 41 − 101* (was 1500 L COMPONENT). 

### ACTION: Replace task 52 − 11 − 41 − 101* with the task that follows: Source Document Ref. No. Chapter 5 Task No. Task Title Task Interval RBR − C700 − 301

Rev. AK − 1 52 − 11 − 41 − 101 * (one star) Discard the Passenger Door Tensator Spring, Part No. GS321 − 0580 − 1 PHASE − IN: For aircraft with passenger door tensator springs with more than 550 Landings COMPONENT, as of the date of TL/MC Temporary Revision 5 − 2 − 44 (Jun 04/2014), this task must be accomplished within 6 Months from the date of TR 5 − 2 − 44 or 1500 Landings COMPONENT, whichever comes first. 650 L COMPONENTJun 04/20145−10−11Page 1 of 1PART 2TR 5−2−44BD−700 TIME LIMITS/MAINTENANCE CHECKS TEMPORARY REVISION NO. 5 − 2 − 44 INSERT IN SECTION 5 − 10 − 11 FACING PAGE 4

NOTE: Record the incorporation of this Temporary Revision on the yellow RECORD OF TEMPORARY REVISIONS sheet at the front of this manual and LIST OF EFFECTIVE TEMPORARY REVISIONS sheet at the front of Part 2.EFFECTIVITY: ALL
#### § 29.65 Accessibility of tobacco.

All tobacco to be inspected, sampled, or weighed upon application shall be made accessible by the applicant for proper examination, including any necessary display in proper light for determination of grade or other characteristics or for drawing of samples. In the case of tobacco in packages, the coverings shall be removed by the applicant in such manner as may be prescribed by the inspector, sampler, or weigher.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Housing and Urban Development

          - [Docket No. FR-5375-N-46]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and Development, HUD.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible use to assist the homeless.

# DATES:

*Effective Date: November 26, 2010.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 7262, Washington, DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 800-927-7588.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with the December 12, 1988 court order in                     *National Coalition for the Homeless*                     v.                    *Veterans Administration,*                     No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been determined suitable or unsuitable this week.                

Dated: November 18, 2010.

Mark R. Johnston,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.

[FR Doc. 2010-29535 Filed 11-23-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
§ 319.55 Notice of quarantine. ( a ) The fact has been determined by the Secretary of Agriculture, and notice is hereby given: ( 1 ) That injurious fungal diseases of rice, including downy mildew (*Sclerospora macrospora*), leaf smut (*Entyloma oryzae*), blight (*Oospora oryzetorum*), and glume blotch (*Melanomma glumarum*), as well as dangerous insect pests, new to and not heretofore widely prevalent or distributed within and throughout the United States, exist, as to one or more of such diseases and pests, in Europe, Asia, Africa, Central America, South America, and other foreign countries and localities, and may be introduced into this country through importations of rice straw and rice hulls; and
( 2 ) That the unrestricted importation of rice straw and rice hulls may result in the entry into the United States of the injurious plant diseases heretofore enumerated, as well as insect pests.
( b ) To prevent the introduction into the United States of the plant pests and diseases indicated above, the Secretary has determined that it is necessary to restrict the importation of rice straw and rice hulls from all foreign locations, except as otherwise provided in this subpart.
( c ) The Administrator may authorize the importation of articles otherwise prohibited by this subpart under conditions specified in a controlled import permit issued in accordance with § 319.6.
( d ) The importation of seed or paddy rice is restricted under Subpart H—Plants for Planting of this part.
( e ) As used in this subpart, unless the context otherwise requires, the term “United States” means the States, the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands of the United States.
[24 FR 10788, Dec. 29, 1959, as amended at 66 FR 21056, Apr. 27, 2001; 78 FR 25571, May 2, 2013; 83 FR 11865, Mar. 19, 2018; 84 FR 2429, Feb. 7, 2019]
#### In re EAST 178th ST.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July 12, *11141906.)

In the matter of the opening of East 178th street.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed.
# L_2020324EN.01000201.xml

| 6.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 324/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 324/2

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2020/1394

of 29 September 2020

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications

‘Varaždinski klipič’ (PGI)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Croatia’s application to register the name ‘Varaždinski klipič’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Croatia’s application to register the name ‘Varaždinski klipič’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Varaždinski klipič’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Varaždinski klipič’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Varaždinski klipič’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 2.3. – bread, pastry, cakes, confectionery, biscuits and other baker’s wares, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 September 2020.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 197, 12.6.2020, p. 26.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
#### In the Matter of Stanley R. Root, Petitioner, v Supreme Court of the State of New York et al., Respondents.

Applicationto enjoin retrial and grant a hearing denied, and petition dismissed, without costs and without disbursements. No opinion. Concur—Birns, J. P., Sandler, Ross, Markewich and Silverman, JJ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS

EARPLUG PRODUCTS

LIABILITY LITIGATION

Case No. 3:19-md-2885

This document relates to:

Rashaan G. Canady

Judge M. Casey Rodgers

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones

Case No. 8:20-cv-05409

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

Comes now EDWARD T. AUTRY, with the law firm of WILLIAMS MCDANIEL, 

PLLC, and gives notice that he will appear as counsel of record for Rashaan J. Canady in the 

Master Docket pursuant to Pretrial Order No. 3 [ECF No. 4]. Mr. Autry has completed the 

administrative requirements outlined in Pretrial Order No. 3, and has been granted admission 

pro hac vice pursuant to paragraph IV.A of Pretrial Order No. 3. Counsel respectfully requests 

that all notices, correspondence, filings and other papers in the Master Docket of MDL 2885 

be served upon him at the address listed below.

This the 23rd day of January, 2023.

Respectfully submitted, 

WILLIAMS McDANIEL, PLLC

By: /s/ Edward T. Autry

Edward T. Autry (#017865)

717 S. White Station Road, Suite 1

Memphis, Tennessee 38117

(901) 766-0887 (Phone)

(901) 766-0915 (Facsimile)

eautry@williamsmcdaniel.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3644 Filed 01/23/23 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 23rd day of January, 2023, a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of Court and served using the CM/ECF 

system.

/s/ Edward T. Autry

Edward T. Autry

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3644 Filed 01/23/23 Page 2 of 2
exv10wxd7y



 






Exhibit 10 (d7)




NINTH AMENDMENT TO THE

CAPITOL BANCORP LTD.

EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN




     The Capitol Bancorp Ltd. Employee Stock Ownership Plan is hereby amended effective July 1,
2004 by adding the following participating employer at the end of the list therein contained:



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Name of	 	Type of	 	State of	 	Date of
	Employer	 	Entity	 	Organization	 	Participation
	Sunrise Bank of San Diego

	 	Banking Corp.
	 	California
	 	July 1, 2004






	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	CAPITOL BANCORP LIMITED	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Dated: December 1, 2004

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Joseph D. Reid	 	 
	

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	

	 	 	 	Joseph D. Reid	 	 
	

	 	 	 	Chairman and CEO	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	SUNRISE BANK OF SAN DIEGO	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Dated: December 1, 2004

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Randy Cundiff	 	 
	

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	

	 	 	 	Randy Cundiff	 	 
	

	 	 	 	President
#### White Eagle Building and Loan Association, defendant in error, v. Estelle Kwiatkowski et al., plaintiffs in error.

Gen. No. 37,292.

Opinion filed November 27, 1934.

Rehearing denied December 10, 1934.

*627T. J. Szmergalski and Heile, Cavender, Milehrist & Kaiser, for plaintiffs in error. Charles J. Grablowski and Joseph C. Kanak, for defendant in error; Millard R. Powers, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Sullivan

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### § 29.1058 Sound.

Free of damage.

[42 FR 21092, Apr. 25, 1977. Redesignated at 47 FR 51721, Nov. 17, 1982, 48 FR 29671, June 28, 1983, 49 FR 16756, Apr. 20, 1984, and 51 FR 25027, July 10, 1986]
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2436 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2436

To prepare a feasibility study and implement demonstration projects to 
         restore the San Gabriel River Watershed in California.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 19, 2013

    Ms. Chu (for herself, Ms. Linda T. Sanchez of California, Mrs. 
Napolitano, Mr. Schiff, Mr. Cardenas, Mr. Lowenthal, Ms. Roybal-Allard, 
and Ms. Hahn) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prepare a feasibility study and implement demonstration projects to 
         restore the San Gabriel River Watershed in California.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``San Gabriel Watershed Restoration 
Act''.

SEC. 2. SAN GABRIEL RIVER WATERSHED RESTORATION, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Chief of the Army Corps of Engineers, in 
coordination with the County of Los Angeles, shall--
            (1) prepare a feasibility study for environmental ecosystem 
        restoration, flood control, water quality control, water supply 
        storage, outdoor recreation enhancements, and other aspects of 
        the San Gabriel River Watershed revitalization that is 
        consistent with the goals of the San Gabriel River master plan 
        published by the County of Los Angeles; and
            (2) identify demonstration projects for construction and 
        restoration of the San Gabriel River Watershed.
    (b) Demonstration Projects.--
            (1) In general.--The Chief of the Army Corps of Engineers 
        is authorized to construct demonstration projects in order to 
        provide information to develop the study under subsection 
        (a)(1).
            (2) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost of any 
        project under this subsection shall be not more than 65 
        percent.
            (3) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
        to be appropriated to carry out this subsection $50,000,000.
                                 <all>
```