alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31**

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANTTO RULE 13a-14(A)OF THE EXCHANGE ACT**

I, Roger Stone, Principal Executive Officer and Principal FinancialOfficer of Stone Arcade Acquisition Corporation, certify that:

1.                 Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Stone Arcade AcquisitionCorporation;

2.                 Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                 Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                 Iam responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

a.                  designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.                 evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c.                  disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                 Ihave disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors:

a.                  allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b.                 anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date: December 12, 2006 | /s/ Roger Stone                                                                                |
|-------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                    | Roger Stone  Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  (Principal Executive and Financial Officer) |

 

----
#### Mart Kirk, Respondent, et al., Plaintiff, v. Patricia Kiernan, Appellant.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from a fall down a stairway to a cellar, the door to which was identical with another door leading into a laundry room, defendant appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered April 12, 1966, as is in favor of plaintiff Mary Kirk, upon a jury verdict. Judgment reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and the facts, and complaint dismissed, without costs. In our opinion, respondent was contributorily negligent as a matter of law in stepping through the first doorway which came to hand in the darkened garage (cf. *Owen*v. *Westchester Country Club,*289 N. Y. 819; *Hudson*v. *Church of Holy Trinity,*250 N. Y. 513; *Piper*v. *New York Cent. & H. Riv. R. R. Co.,*156 N. Y. 224). Although she had been in the garage a number of times during the short period of her employment, she testified that she had never been there at night before and that she was unaware of the existence of the door leading to the cellar. There were other circumstances which should have given her warning that she was on unfamiliar ground. For one, the door which she sought was always open, but the door upon which she put her hand was closed. For another, she reached into what she believed to be the laundry room to find a table which stood just inside the door, but there was no table. Despite these warnings that she was on strange ground in the darkened garage, she made no attempt to illuminate the garage or the “room” or to retrace her steps. Instead, she reached in a little further, missed her step and fell down the steps to the basement. While we agree that the jury was entitled to find that maintenance of the identical doors in close proximity created a foreseeable hazard *(Christianson*v. *Breen,*288 N. Y. 435; *Cole*v. *Lamattina,*13 A D 2d 993), we think it clear that respondent failed to exercise due care for her own safety (cf. *Rohrbacher*v. *Gillig,*203 N. Y. 413, 417-418). Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 21

                        SUBSIDIARIES OF UNUM CORPORATION


Listed below are the subsidiaries of UNUM Corporation, as of December 31, 1998,
with their respective jurisdiction of incorporation.

UNUM Holding Company (Delaware)

                 First UNUM Life Insurance Company (New York)
                 Claims Service International, Inc. (Delaware)
                 UNUM International Underwriters Inc. (Delaware)

UNUM Life Insurance Company of America (Maine)

Colonial Companies, Inc. (Delaware)

                 Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Company (South Carolina)
                 BenefitAmerica, Inc. (South Carolina)

Options and Choices, Inc. (Wyoming)

UNUM European Holding Company Limited (United Kingdom)

                 UNUM Management Company Limited (United Kingdom)
                 UNUM Limited (United Kingdom)
                 Claims Services International Limited (United Kingdom)

Duncanson & Holt, Inc. (New York)

                 Duncanson & Holt Services, Inc. (Maine)
                 Duncanson & Holt Administrative Services, Inc. (Delaware)
                 Duncanson & Holt Canada Ltd. (Canada)
                 Duncanson & Holt Asia PTE Ltd. (Singapore)
                 Duncanson & Holt Europe Ltd. (United Kingdom)

                     Duncanson & Holt Underwriters Ltd. (United Kingdom)
                     Duncanson & Holt Agencies Ltd. (United Kingdom)
                     Duncanson & Holt Syndicate Management Ltd. (United Kingdom)
                     Trafalgar Underwriting Agencies Ltd. (United Kingdom)

UNUM Japan Accident Insurance Company Limited (Japan)

UNUM International Ltd. (Bermuda)

Boston Compania Argentina de Seguros (Argentina)
§ 32.401 Cost of samples for grease mohair grades. ( a ) *Complete set.* $22 each, delivered to any destination with the United States and $25 each, delivered to any destination outside the United States.
( b ) *Individual sample.* $2.50 each, delivered to any destination within the United States, and $3 each, delivered to any destination outside the United States.
<PAGE>
[PRG SCHULTZ LETTERHEAD]


December 2, 2003




Richard Bacon
4447 Northside Parkway, NW
Apt. 321
Atlanta, GA 30327

Dear Rick:

As we discussed, there is a potential conflict between your signed employment
letter (Sections 7 -- Termination and 8 -- Severance Payments) and the standard
PRG-Schultz Employee Agreement (Section 8 -- Employment at Will). In the event
of termination, Sections 7 and 8 of your employment letter will take precedence
over Section 8 of the standard PRG-Schultz Employee Agreement.

The remainder of the standard PRG-Schultz Employee Agreement terms and
conditions remain unchanged and unaffected by your signed employment letter.


Sincerely,

/s/ Marie Neff

Marie Neff
EVP, Human Resources
98-1262.

#### State ex rel. Harman v. Waite.

In Procedendo. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Cook, J., dissents.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

LARRY ALONZO HILL BEY,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO.: 4:20cv167-MW/MAF

FRED O’BRIAN, et al.,

Defendants.

_________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report 

and Recommendation. ECF No. 10. Upon consideration, no objections having 

been filed by the parties,1

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as this Court’s 

opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “Plaintiff’s amended complaint, 

ECF No. 6, is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be 

granted and his motion for default, ECF No. 8, is DENIED.” The Clerk shall also 

1 Plaintiff filed an “indemnity agreement,” ECF No. 11, which even liberally construed cannot be 

read as an objection to the report and recommendation. 

Case 4:20-cv-00167-MW-MAF Document 12 Filed 05/26/20 Page 1 of 2
2

close the file. 

SO ORDERED on May 26, 2020.

s/Mark E. Walker 

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00167-MW-MAF Document 12 Filed 05/26/20 Page 2 of 2
Searched for **http://www.ssa.gov/pubs/10064.html**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.ssa.gov/pubs/10064.html**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
#### § 201.66 [Reserved]
#### § 3430.402 [Reserved]
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1902 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1902

 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for timely 
            access to post-mastectomy items under Medicare.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 2013

 Mr. Fitzpatrick (for himself and Ms. Moore) introduced the following 
 bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and 
  in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for timely 
            access to post-mastectomy items under Medicare.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Breast Cancer Recovery Improvement 
Act''.

SEC. 2. TIMELY ACCESS TO POST-MASTECTOMY ITEMS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1834(h)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395m) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subparagraph (H) as subparagraph (I); 
        and
            (2) by inserting after subparagraph (G) the following new 
        subparagraph:
                    ``(H) Special payment rule for post-mastectomy 
                external breast prosthesis garments.--Payment for post-
                mastectomy external breast prosthesis garments shall be 
                made regardless of whether such items are supplied to 
                the beneficiary prior to or after the mastectomy 
                procedure or other breast cancer surgical procedure. 
                The Secretary shall develop policies to ensure 
                appropriate beneficiary access and utilization 
                safeguards for such items supplied to a beneficiary 
                prior to the mastectomy or other breast cancer surgical 
                procedure.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect as of the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



|                                               |  |                                                             
|---------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|Subsidiaries of Alliance Financial Corporation |  | State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization
|                                               | 
|Alliance Bank, N.A.                            |  | United States                                               
|                                               | 
|Alliance Financial Capital Trust I             |  | State of Delaware                                           
|                                               | 
|Alliance Financial Capital Trust II            |  | State of Delaware                                           
|                                               | 
|Ladds Agency, Inc.                            |  | State of New York                                           
|                                               | 
|Subsidiaries of Alliance Bank,
N.A.            |  | State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization
|                                               | 
|Alliance Preferred Funding Corp.               |  | State of Delaware                                           
|                                               | 
|Alliance Leasing, Inc.                         |  | State of New York
Case 5:20-cv-00070-MW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 02/27/20 Page 1 of 10
Case 5:20-cv-00070-MW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 02/27/20 Page 2 of 10
Case 5:20-cv-00070-MW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 02/27/20 Page 3 of 10
Case 5:20-cv-00070-MW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 02/27/20 Page 4 of 10
Case 5:20-cv-00070-MW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 02/27/20 Page 5 of 10
Case 5:20-cv-00070-MW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 02/27/20 Page 6 of 10
Case 5:20-cv-00070-MW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 02/27/20 Page 7 of 10
Case 5:20-cv-00070-MW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 02/27/20 Page 8 of 10
Case 5:20-cv-00070-MW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 02/27/20 Page 9 of 10
Case 5:20-cv-00070-MW-MJF Document 1-1 Filed 02/27/20 Page 10 of 10
§ 3201.22 Fertilizers. ( a ) *Definition.* Products formulated or processed to provide nutrients for plant growth and/or beneficial bacteria to convert nutrients into plant usable forms. Biobased fertilizers, which are likely to consist mostly of biobased components, may include both biobased and chemical components. Note to paragraph ( a
):
Biobased fertilizers, as well as other fertilizers, may be made with recycled hazardous waste. Such fertilizers need to meet applicable land disposal restriction standards for any hazardous constituents they contain, as required under 40 CFR 266.20(d).
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The preferred procurement product must have a biobased content of at least 71 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than May 14, 2009, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased fertilizers. By that date, Federal agencies that have the responsibility for drafting or reviewing specifications for items to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased fertilizers.
( d ) *Determining overlap with an EPA-designated recovered content product.* Qualifying biobased products that fall under this item may, in some cases, overlap with the EPA-designated recovered content product: Fertilizer. USDA is requesting that manufacturers of these qualifying biobased products provide information on the BioPreferred Web site of qualifying biobased products about the intended uses of the product, information on whether or not the product contains any recovered material, in addition to biobased ingredients, and performance standards against which the product has been tested. This information will assist Federal agencies in determining whether or not a qualifying biobased product overlaps with EPA-designated fertilizer product and which product should be afforded the preference in purchasing.
Note to paragraph ( d
):
Fertilizers within this designated item can be made with recycled materials. Under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, section 6002, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency designated fertilizers containing recovered materials as items for which Federal agencies must give preference in their purchasing programs. The designation can be found in the Comprehensive Procurement Guideline, 40 CFR 247.15. EPA provides recovered materials content recommendations for fertilizers in the Recovered Materials Advisory Notice (RMAN) published for these products. The RMAN recommendations can be found by accessing EPA's Web site *http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/non-hw/procure/products.htm* and then clicking on the appropriate product name.
[73 FR 27953, May 14, 2008]
#### Board of Education of Central High School District No. 2 of the Towns of Hempstead and North Hempstead, Appellant, v. James E. Allen, Jr., as Commissioner of Education of the State of New York, Respondent. (And Another *Proceeding.)*

*Per Curiam.*

Appeals by petitioners, a Board of Education of a Central High School District and a Board of Education of a Union Free School District, from a combined order and judgment of the Supreme Court which dismissed both petitions in actions brought for declaratory judgments but subsequently and now treated as proceedings under article 78 of the CPLR (see 25 A D 2d 659) to review determinations of the State Commissioner of Education which refused petitioners’ respective requests that the Commissioner make enumerations of the inhabitants of said respective districts pursuant to section 1711 of the Education Law, prerequisite to the appointment of superintendents of schools. (Opn.: 51 Misc 2d 181.) The thrust of appellants’ attack is clearly to the constitutional validity of the statute, and we are not persuaded to the contrary by the nicety of the distinctions or qualifications which appellants urge in stating that such is not the purpose or effect of their argument. In the purely corporate capacities in which they sue, petitioners are without standing to mount such an attack. *(Black Riv. Regulating Dist.*v. *Adirondack League Club,*307 N. Y. 475, app. dsmd. 351 U. S. 922; *County of Albany*v. *Hooker,*204 N. Y. 1; *Board of Educ.*v. *Allen,*27 A D 2d 69; *City of Buffalo*v. *State Bd. of Equalization & Assessment,*26 A D 2d 313; and, see, also, *Matter of Diocese of Rochester*v. *Planning Bd.,*1 N Y 2d 508, 519-520; *Shepherd*v. *Mount Vernon Trust Co.,*269 N. Y. 234, 244-247.) Were the merits open to our consideration, we would hold that the statute in dispute conferred upon the Commissioner a constitutionally valid discretionary authority which was properly exercised in the eases before us; as the Special Term found (51 Misc 2d 181, *supra).*Judgment and order in each ease affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur; Staley, Jr., J., only in the result.
. . . . 

.: 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ~TEXAS ’ 

--- --- 

muwiotul5-*4
#### § 33.14 Opportunity for hearing.

The person accused shall be entitled to a hearing, provided he or she makes written requests therefore and files a written responsive answer to the charges made not later than 10 days after service of such notice on him or her. The right to hearing shall be restricted to matters in issue. At such hearing, he or she shall have the right to be present in person or by counsel and to submit evidence and argument in his or her behalf. Failure to request a hearing within the specified time or failure to appear at the hearing when scheduled shall be deemed a waiver of the right to hearing. Such person may, in lieu of requesting an oral hearing, file a sworn written statement with the Secretary not later than 10 days after service of such notice upon him or her.
#### § 322.3 Costs and charges.

We will furnish, without cost, the services of an inspector during normal business hours and at the inspector's places of duty. You will be responsible for all costs and charges arising from inspection outside of normal business hours or away from the inspector's places of duty.[1] You are also responsible for all costs and charges related to any exportation or destruction of shipments, in accordance with § 322.2(c)(1). Further, if you import bees or germ plasm into a containment facility for research or processing, you will be responsible for all additional costs and charges associated with the importation.

###### Footnotes -
  322.3

[1] Information on costs for services of an inspector are contained in part 354 of this chapter.
Attachment I



### SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST .

. Circle YES orNO behind each number or letter to detennine ifa formal SIP revision submittal is complete.

Ifthe SIP submission is bein:g parallel processed, circle YES orNO behind only the·numbers with an *. l. Submittal letter (Governor or designee) @ NO 2. Evidence ofadoption which contains: 

# I a. Actual copy ofregulatory changes NO b. Date adopted NO c. Date effective NO d. Signatory requirements NO *e. Ifparallel processing, schedule for final adoption or issuance YES NO 

### 1'1/ (;( *f. Copy ofthe proposed/draft regulations 

# @ NO



## , *3. Legal authority (evidence that state has necessary legal authority to adopt and implement revision) 

# @ NO 4. Copy ofpublic notice 

# @; NO 5. Certification that public hearing was held 

# @ NO 6. Compilation ofpublic comments and**stat~** @

- NO _**€)(fl::t.~~iO,~i** "Icluk.\ responses**WI~\A e\rv\~** **~l'~ o..Md-a(''J**  Does TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT contain the following: ***Stcl\elMe",~,,>** 

# ()/ 0. l. Pollutants affected by the change YES NO 2. Sources affected YES NO 

### 3. Quantification ofthe changes in emissions YES NO (actual/allowable) 4. Demonstration ofprotection: NAAQS YES NO PSD increments YES NO RFP YES NO Visibility YES NO 5. Full modeling infonnation YES NO 6. Evidence, where necessary, that emission limitations are based on continuous emission reduction technology. YES NO 7. Evidence that a revision contains emission limitations, work practice standards, and recordkeeping/reporting requirements YES NO 8. Compliance/enforcement strategies including how compliance will be determined in practice, and at what frequency. YES NO 

### 9. As appropriate, special economic and technological YES NO
§ 3430.905 Funding restrictions. ( a ) *Prohibition against construction.* Grant funds awarded under this authority may not be used for the renovation or refurbishment of research, education, or extension space; the purchase or installation of fixed equipment in such space; or the planning, repair, rehabilitation, acquisition, or construction of buildings or facilities.
( b ) *Prohibition on tuition remission.* Tuition remission (e.g., scholarships, fellowships) is not allowed.
( c ) *Indirect costs.* Subject to § 3430.54, indirect costs are allowable with the exception of indirect costs for Conference/Planning grants, which are not allowed.