alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 246 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 246

  To require the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System to 
    collect, publish, and keep current an objective index of dollar-
 denominated loan interest rates of various maturities, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 14, 2013

Mr. Schweikert introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System to 
    collect, publish, and keep current an objective index of dollar-
 denominated loan interest rates of various maturities, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rate of Average Time Execution Act 
of 2013'' or the ``RATE Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. PUBLICATION OF CERTAIN LOAN RATES.

    (a) In General.--The Federal Reserve Act is amended by inserting 
after section 11B the following:

``SEC. 11C. PUBLICATION OF CERTAIN LOAN RATES.

    ``(a) In General.--The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System shall collect, publish, and keep current a set of indices 
reporting the rate for dollar-denominated loans of various maturities.
    ``(b) Specific Requirements.--The indices described under 
subsection (a) shall--
            ``(1) be derived from a collation of objective, anonymized 
        data collected from a variety of financial institutions for a 
        variety of loan products, where such institutions are 
        representative of a broad range of participants in the 
        financial market;
            ``(2) contain information representing executed 
        transactions from a basket of credit products, determined by 
        the Board and derived from real market data based on actual 
        borrowing costs;
            ``(3) list the average of loan rates with maturities of 
        overnight, one month, three months, six months, nine months, 
        and one year;
            ``(4) not contain the Federal funds rate;
            ``(5) be published on the Board's website and updated 
        weekly; and
            ``(6) be clearly labeled in such a way that they cannot be 
        misinterpreted to be rate targets set by the Federal Open 
        Market Committee.''.
    (b) Rulemaking.--The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve 
System shall issue regulations to carry out section 11C of the Federal 
Reserve Act, as added by subsection (a), before the end of the 90-day 
period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
FILED

September 2, 1998

Cecil W. Crowson

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

WILLIAMSON COUNTY BROADCASTING )

COMPANY, INC., and WILLIAM B. ORMES, )

)

Plaintiffs/Appellants, )

) Appeal No.

VS. ) 01-A-01-9709-CH-00480

)

INTERMEDIA PARTNERS, a California ) Davidson Chancery

limited partnership; INTERMEDIA CAPITAL ) No. 92-2930-II

MANAGEMENT; a general partner of )

InterMedia Partners; LEO J. HINDERY, JR., )

Managing General Partner and Chief )

Executive Officer of InterMedia Capital )

Management; ROBIN CABLE SYSTEMS; )

ROBIN MEDIA GROUP, INC.; FIRST )

CABLEVISION, INC.; ROBIN CABLE )

SYSTEMS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; )

TENNESSEE VALLEY CABLEVISION, )

)

Defendants/Appellees. )

ORDER ON PETITION TO REHEAR

The appellants and appellees have both filed a Petition to Rehear,

which we have considered and found to be without merit. It is, therefore, ordered

that the petitions be denied.

_________________________________

HENRY F. TODD, PRESIDING JUDGE

MIDDLE SECTION

_________________________________

BEN H. CANTRELL, JUDGE

_________________________________

WILLIAM B. CAIN, JUDGE
USGS Publications Warehouse - Citation View Home

Publication Citation

Online Document Versions

View document

USGS Store

Currently unavailable through the USGS

Store.

Publication Type USGS Numbered Series

Title

Methods and computer programs to improve pathline resolution near weak

sinks representing wells in MODFLOW and MODPATH ground-water-flow

simulations

Author Spitz, Frederick. J.

Year 2001

Series Open-File Report

Series Number 2000-392

Edition -

Language ENGLISH

Description vi, 41 p. : ill., maps ; 28 cm.

USGS Library

Call Number -

USGS Home

Contact USGS

Search USGS

Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey

URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/

Page Contact Information: Contact the Pubs Warehouse Team

Page Last modified: 10/31/2011 14:30:28

USGS Publications Warehouse http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/ofr00392

1 of 1 10/31/2011 2:31 PM
Exhibit 10.6(b)


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This First Amendment to Employment Agreement
is dated as of March 1, 2004 by and between NetBank, Inc. (the “Company”) and Charles E. Mapson (the “Executive”).


 


The Employment Agreement between the Company
and the Executive dated as of April 1, 2002 (the “Original Employment
Agreement”) is hereby amended as follows:


 


1.  Amendment
to Term.  Section 1.10
of the Original Employment Agreement defining the term “Term” is hereby amended
and restated to read as follows:


 


“1.10                     “Term” means the period
commencing on the date hereof and ending on April 1, 2006.”


 


2.  Base Salary; Incentive Compensation.   The terms “Base Salary” and “Incentive
Compensation” as defined in Sections 1.4 and 4.2(a), respectively, are hereby
amended to reflect whatever Base Salary and Incentive Compensation that is
determined by the Chief Executive Officer and approved by the Compensation
Committee, from time to time; provided, however, that so long as the Executive
performs his or her duties and obligations satisfactorily, neither the Base
Salary nor the target percentage of Incentive Compensation shall be decreased,
without the written consent of the Executive.


 


3.  Amendment to Reflect Paid Time Off.   Section 4.3(c) of the Original
Employment Agreement setting forth benefits for vacation time is hereby amended
and restated to read as follows:


 


“(c)  
On a non-cumulative
basis, the Executive shall be entitled to such days of paid time off each year
as prescribed for similarly situated officers, during which his compensation
shall be paid in full, and which shall be taken as approved in advance by the
Company, taking into account the requirements of the Company.”


 


The amendments set forth above shall be
effective immediately.  All other terms
and provisions of the Original Employment Agreement shall remain unaffected by
this Amendment.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have
hereunto set their hands as of the date first above written.


 


	
  COMPANY:

  	
  EXECUTIVE:

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  NETBANK,
  INC.

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/ Charles E. Mapson

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Douglas K. Freeman

  	
   

  	
  Name: 
  Charles E. Mapson

  	
   

  
	
  Douglas K.
  Freeman

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Chairman and
  Chief Executive Officer
§ 301.92-6 Compliance agreements and cancellation. ( a ) Any person engaged in growing, processing, handling, or moving regulated articles, associated articles, or non-host nursery stock may enter into a compliance agreement when an inspector determines that the person understands this subpart, agrees to comply with its provisions, and agrees to comply with all the provisions contained in the compliance agreement.[1]
( b ) Any compliance agreement may be canceled, either orally or in writing, by an inspector whenever the inspector finds that the person who has entered into the compliance agreement has failed to comply with this subpart. If the cancellation is oral, the cancellation and the reasons for the cancellation will be confirmed in writing as promptly as circumstances allow. Any person whose compliance agreement has been canceled may appeal the decision, in writing, within 10 days after receiving written notification of the cancellation. The appeal must state all of the facts and reasons upon which the person relies to show that the compliance agreement was wrongfully canceled. As promptly as circumstances allow, the Administrator will grant or deny the appeal, in writing, stating the reasons for the decision. A hearing will be held to resolve any conflict as to any material fact. Rules of practice concerning a hearing will be adopted by the Administrator.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control numbers 0579-0088 and 0579-0310) [72 FR 8597, Feb. 27, 2007, as amended at 84 FR 16194, Apr. 18, 2019; 87 FR 80019, Dec. 29, 2022] Footnotes -
301.92-6
[1] Compliance agreement forms are available without charge from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Plant Protection and Quarantine, Invasive Species and Pest Management, 4700 River Road Unit 160, Riverdale, MD 20737-1236, and from local offices of the Plant Protection and Quarantine, which are listed in telephone directories. Forms are also available on the Internet at *http://www.aphis.usda.gov/ppq/ispm/pramorum/resources.html .*
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2364 

To amend the Equal Credit Opportunity Act to prohibit discrimination on 

account of sexual orientation or gender identity when extending credit. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 13, 2013 

Mr. ISRAEL (for himself, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Ms. BONAMICI, Mr. CAPUANO, 

Ms. CHU, Mr. CICILLINE, Ms. CLARKE, Mr. CLAY, Mr. CONNOLLY, Mrs. 

DAVIS of California, Mr. ELLISON, Mr. FARR, Mr. FATTAH, Mr. GRIJALVA, Ms. HAHN, Mr. HIMES, Mr. PETERS of Michigan, Ms. PINGREE

of Maine, Mr. POLIS, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. SHERMAN, Ms. TSONGAS, 

Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, and Mr. WAXMAN) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Equal Credit Opportunity Act to prohibit 

discrimination on account of sexual orientation or gender 

identity when extending credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Freedom from Dis5 crimination in Credit Act of 2013’’. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2364 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION AGAINST DISCRIMINATION ON AC2 COUNT OF SEXUAL ORIENTATION OR GEN3 DER IDENTITY. 

4 Subsection (a)(1) of section 701 of the Equal Credit 

5 Opportunity Act (15 U.S.C. 1691) is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘on the basis of race, color, reli7 gion, national origin, sex or marital status,’’; and 

8 (2) by inserting ‘‘on the basis of race, color, re9 ligion, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, gender 

10 identity, or marital status,’’. 

11 SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS. 

12 Section 702 of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (15 

13 U.S.C. 1691a) is amended— 

14 (1) by striking subsections (f) and (g); and 

15 (2) by inserting after subsection (e) the fol16 lowing new subsections: 

17 ‘‘(f) The term ‘gender identity’ means the gender-re18 lated identity, appearance, or mannerisms or other gen19 der-related characteristics of an individual, with or with20 out regard to the individual’s designated sex at birth. 

21 ‘‘(g) The term ‘person’ means a natural person, a 

22 corporation, government or governmental subdivision or 

23 agency, trust, estate, partnership, cooperative, or associa24 tion. 

25 ‘‘(h) The term ‘sexual orientation’ means homosex26 uality, heterosexuality, or bisexuality. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2364 IH

1 ‘‘(i) Any reference to any requirement imposed under 

2 this title or any provision of this title shall be deemed to 

3 include a reference to the regulations of the Bureau under 

4 this title or the provision of this title in question.’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:97cr114-01/LAC

TITO CASTILLO

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on April 5, 2010 

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION FOR REDUCTION OF SENTENCE PURSUANT TO TITLE 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) 

Filed by DEFENDANT PRO SE on 3/11/10 Doc.# 35

RESPONSES:

 NONE on Doc.#

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Jerry Marbut

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Jerry Marbut

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 20 day of

th

April, 2010, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) At sentencing, the defendant was held accountable by the Court for 83

kilograms of cocaine base which resulted in a base offense level of 38. Pursuant

to Amendment 706 to the Sentencing Guidelines, the Drug Quantity Table at §2D1.1

assigns a base offense level of 38 for 4.5 kilograms or more of cocaine base.

Since the defendant’s base offense level is unchanged, he is not eligible for any

reduction in his sentence of imprisonment pursuant to Amendment 706.

s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

vs. Case No: 3:98cr126/LAC 

MICHAEL BLANKENSHIP

ORDER

The defendant has filed a notice of appeal which this court construes as a request

for a certificate of appealability. (Doc. 272). He seeks to appeal this court’s order denying

his motion seeking relief under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6), and his motion for reconsideration

of that order. Appeal of denial of Rule 60(b) motion requires certificate of appealability.

Gonzalez v. Secretary of Department of Corrections, 317 F.3d 1308, 1312 (11th Cir. 2003).

A COA should not issue in the appeal from the denial of a Rule 60(b) motion in a habeas

case unless the petitioner shows, at a minimum, that it is debatable among jurists of

reason whether the district court abused its discretion. See Mobley v. Head, 306 F.3d

1096, 1097 (11th Cir. 2002) (“This Court reviews a denial of a 60(b) motion for an abuse

of discretion.”). Because the defendant has not made a substantial showing of the denial

of a constitutional right, his request for a certificate of appealability is DENIED. 

Defendant has not filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Because

the court finds that this appeal is not taken in good faith, and that defendant would not be

otherwise entitled to so proceed, Fed.R.App.P. 24(a)(3), he shall pay the $455.00 appellate

filing fee within thirty days.

Case 3:98-cr-00126-LC-MD Document 276 Filed 08/12/08 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 3:98cr126/LAC

His request for an extension of time to file his motion to proceed in forma pauperis

and for a certificate of appealability (doc. 275) are denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 12th day of August, 2008.

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:98-cr-00126-LC-MD Document 276 Filed 08/12/08 Page 2 of 2
#### § 29.76 Mandatory inspection ticket.

A mandatory inspection ticket shall consist of a Tobacco Inspection Certificate made and issued in combination with an auction warehouse ticket in a form approved by the Director.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2326 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2326

    To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special 
     resource study of the Medgar Evers House, located in Jackson, 
                  Mississippi, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 11, 2013

 Mr. Thompson of Mississippi introduced the following bill; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct a special 
     resource study of the Medgar Evers House, located in Jackson, 
                  Mississippi, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

     This Act may be cited as the ``Medgar Evers House Study Act''.

SEC. 2. SPECIAL RESOURCE STUDY.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary of the Interior shall conduct a special 
resource study of the home of the late civil rights activist Medgar 
Evers, located at 2332 Margaret Walker Alexander Drive in Jackson, 
Mississippi.
    (b) Contents.--In conducting the study under subsection (a), the 
Secretary shall--
            (1) evaluate the national significance of the site;
            (2) determine the suitability and feasibility of 
        designating the site as a unit of the National Park System;
            (3) consider other alternatives for preservation, 
        protection, and interpretation of the site by Federal, State, 
        or local governmental entities, or private and nonprofit 
        organizations;
            (4) consult with interested Federal, State, or local 
        governmental entities, private and nonprofit organizations or 
        any other interested individuals; and
            (5) identify cost estimates for any Federal acquisition, 
        development, interpretation, operation, and maintenance 
        associated with the alternatives.
    (c) Applicable Law.--The study required under subsection (a) shall 
be conducted in accordance with section 8 of National Park Service 
General Authorities Act (16 U.S.C. 1a-5).
    (d) Report.--Not later than 3 years after the date on which funds 
are first made available for the study under subsection (a), the 
Secretary shall submit to the Committee on Natural Resources of the 
House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural 
Resources of the Senate a report containing the results of the study 
and any conclusions and recommendations of the Secretary.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 31.1** **Certification    Pursuant to    Rule 13a-14(a)    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934**     I, Mark R. Holden, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on    Form 10-Q    of American Commercial Lines Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this annual report,    fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls    and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosures controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is    being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably    likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal    control over the financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     /s/  MARK R. HOLDEN    Mark R. Holden    President and Chief Executive Officer     Date: May 11, 2006
Summary of Directors Early Retirement Packages



 EXHIBIT 10.29 
  
 SUMMARY OF DIRECTOR EARLY RETIREMENT PACKAGES 
  
 In January 2005, the Board determined that the size of the Board should be reduced from 19 members to a target range
of 12 to 14 members in view of the charter consolidation of the Company’s subsidiary banks that occurred in 2004. At its regular meeting on January 25, 2005, the Board offered one-time early retirement benefits to directors in the amount of
fees they were paid during 2004 for Board and committee service. 
  
 During the first quarter of 2005, the following directors took advantage of this benefit and will receive the one-time payments as follows: 
  

				
	 Robert Archer
	  	$	44,000
	 Susan B. Ford Dorsey
	  	$	36,000
	 James Jackson
	  	$	44,000
	 Stanley Kangas
	  	$	48,000
	 Rex Lindsay
	  	$	84,000
	 Warrant Thoits
	  	$	72,000
	 T. John Whalen
	  	$	40,000
Exhibit
10.19
 
 **Additional
Compensation Information**
 
 On
February 8, 2005, the Compensation Committee of the Company recommended, and the
Board of Directors approved, the following 2005 annual base salaries payable to
M. Christine Jacobs, James A. MacLennan, Bruce W. Smith, R. Michael O’Bannon and
Tracy C. Caswell (the “Executive Officers”). With respect to Ms. Jacobs’ 2005
salary, the determination was made by the independent directors of the Company.
 
 ******
 Named
      Executive Officer
    Base
      Salary for
      2005Jacobs
    $431,000MacLennan
    $270,000Smith
    $237,000O’Bannon
    $186,000Caswell
    $180,000
 
 
 Information
regarding director compensation is set forth in the Company’s Form 8-K filed
February 14, 2005 and incorporated by reference herein.
#### § 29.2267 Fiber.

The term applied to the veins in a tobacco leaf. The large central vein is called the midrib or stem. The smaller lateral and cross veins are considered from the standpoint of size and color.