alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2005-2372.

#### Brown v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.

Defiance App. No. 4-05-07, 164 Ohio App.3d 311, 2005-Ohio-5887. Reported at 108 Ohio St.3d 1512, 2006- Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 856. On motion for reconsideration and motion to strike motion for reconsideration. Motion to strike denied. Motion for reconsideration granted to the following extent:

The discretionary appeal is accepted; the cause is held for the decision in 2006-0405, *Geretz v. Ohio Dept. of Job & Family Servs.,*Erie App. No. E-05-042, 2006-Ohio-321; and the briefing schedule is stayed.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2021071EN.01002401.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 2.3.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 71/24 |

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) 2020/2131 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2020 on the elimination of customs duties on certain goods

(
[Official Journal of the European Union L 430 of 18 December 2020](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2020_430_R_TOC)
)

On page 3, Article 5(4):

for:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘4. | At the request of the economic operators concerned, the national customs authorities of the Member States concerned shall reimburse any duties paid in excess of those applicable in accordance with this Regulation for imports from the United States between 1 August 2020 and 18 December 2020.’, |

read:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘4. | At the request of the economic operators concerned, the national customs authorities of the Member States concerned shall reimburse any duties paid in excess of those applicable in accordance with this Regulation for imports between 1 August 2020 and 18 December 2020.’. |

---
#### § 29.402 Advance notice.

The importer shall notify, orally or in writing, the Raleigh Regional Office, USDA, AMS, Tobacco Division, P.O. Box 27846, Raleigh, North Carolina 27611, or the Lexington Regional Office, USDA, AMS, Tobacco Division, 333 Waller Avenue, Lexington, Kentucky 40504, of the date and location that tobacco subject to inspection under § 29.400 will be unloaded for warehousing, manipulation, or manufacturing. This notice shall be received at the Regional Office at least five working days prior to unloading the tobacco for warehousing, manipulation, or manufacturing.

[49 FR 27468, July 3, 1984]
AFS-12-124-E January 27, 2012

Exemption No. 10439 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-1370

Mr. Benjamin Watsky

41 James Street Montclair, New Jersey 07042

Dear Mr. Watsky:

This letter is to inform you that we have denied your petition for exemption. It transmits our decision and explains its basis.

The Basis for Our Decision

By undated letter received at the Federal docket on Decem ber 12, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for an exemption from § 61.153(a) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to apply for an airline transport pilot (ATP) certificate in order to complete training and eventually act as a required aircrew member with a part 121 carrier.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because this is not a precedent-setting petition, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to you.

The FAA issued a denial of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Denial of Exemption No. 6826 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that the petitioner failed to show how his situation was unique in comparison to the needs of other pilots and that a grant of exemption would not be in the public interest. The FAA noted that his personal interest to be able to apply for an ATP certificate before reaching his 23rd birthday is not the same as the interest of the public as a whole. Additionally, the FAA determined that compliance with this rule would ensure a high maturity level for those pilots who are permitted to operate as pilot in command in operations requiring an ATP2

certificate and that the minimum age requirement of 23 years would further the cause of safety.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed Denial of Exemption No. 6826;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for denying the enclosed Denial of Exemption No. 6826 also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption would not be in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Adm inistrator has delegated to me, I hereby deny your petition for an exemption from 14 CFR § 61.153(a).

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan Acting Director, Flight Standards

Service

Enclosure
**Therm oelectric Wine Chiller Table of Results**  **Cold Setting**

DOE ID Number Capacity

(Wine Bottles) Total

Refrigerated Volume (ft3) Ambient

Tem perature (°F) Annual Energy

Use (Using 1.2 Usage Factor-- kWh/year) Daily Energy

Linear Interpolation (kWh/day) Daily

Energy (kWh) 90 1.33 1.144 72 142 0.32

- 90 1.77

- 72 439 1.00 1.824 90 1.51 1.512 72 664 1.51 1.584 1 6 0.64

3 28 2.26 2 12 1.08**Cold Setting Mid Setting**  **Warm Setting** 

Compartment Tem perature (°F) Daily

Energy (kWh)Compartment

Tem perature (°F) Daily

Energy (kWh)Compartment

Tem perature (°F) 57.3 1.144 57.2 0.456 65.8

- 0.328 54.7 0.152 64.2

- 1.782 54.8 0.944 74.3 39.9 0.978 55.5

- - 71.3

- - 1.512 71.5 54.7 0.720 58.1

- -
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2575 

AN ACT 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

the 30-hour threshold for classification as a full-time 

employee for purposes of the employer mandate in the 

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and replace 

it with 40 hours. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2575 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Save American Work3 ers Act of 2014’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF 30-HOUR THRESHOLD FOR CLASSIFICA5 TION AS FULL-TIME EMPLOYEE FOR PUR6 POSES OF THE EMPLOYER MANDATE IN THE 

7 PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE 

8 CARE ACT AND REPLACEMENT WITH 40 

9 HOURS. 

10 (a) FULL-TIME EQUIVALENTS.—Paragraph (2) of 

11 section 4980H(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 

12 is amended— 

13 (1) by repealing subparagraph (E), and 

14 (2) by inserting after subparagraph (D) the fol15 lowing new subparagraph: 

16 ‘‘(E) FULL-TIME EQUIVALENTS TREATED

17 AS FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES.—Solely for pur18 poses of determining whether an employer is an 

19 applicable large employer under this paragraph, 

20 an employer shall, in addition to the number of 

21 full-time employees for any month otherwise de22 termined, include for such month a number of 

23 full-time employees determined by dividing the 

24 aggregate number of hours of service of employ25 ees who are not full-time employees for the 

26 month by 174.’’. 
3 

•HR 2575 EH

1 (b) FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES.—Paragraph (4) of sec2 tion 4980H(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 

3 amended— 

4 (1) by repealing subparagraph (A), and 

5 (2) by inserting before subparagraph (B) the 

6 following new subparagraph: 

7 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘full-time 

8 employee’ means, with respect to any month, an 

9 employee who is employed on average at least 

10 40 hours of service per week.’’. 

11 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 this section shall apply to months beginning after Decem13 ber 31, 2013. 

Passed the House of Representatives April 3, 2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2575 

AN ACT 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 

able Care Act and replace it with 40 hours. mandate in the Patient Protection and Afforda full-time employee for purposes of the employer repeal the 30-hour threshold for classification as
Letter Agreement, dated Dec. 30,2004, by and between Nektar and Nevan C. Elam



 Exhibit 10.56 
  
 December 30, 2004 
  

Nevan Elam 
  
 Dear Nevan: 
  
 I am pleased and excited to offer you the position of General Counsel and Secretary at Nektar Therapeutics, reporting to Ajit Gill, CEO and President. Your targeted
compensation will be $375,000.00 on an annual basis. Of this amount, your fixed compensation will be $281,250.00 and your target variable compensation at 25% will be $93,750.00 per year. Of this variable amount ($93,750.00), the first 6 months of
the first year of employment will be guaranteed at 100% regardless of company performance. 
  
 In addition, you will receive a sign-on bonus of $50,000.00. You will receive half of this amount ($25,000) at 3 months from date of hire and the remaining balance ($25,000) at 9 months from date of hire. This amount
will be subject to payroll withholding and deductions. If your employment terminates other than “without cause” by Nektar or if you resign before your first anniversary, you agree to reimburse Nektar for the full amount of this sign-on
bonus. 
  
 You are also eligible to participate in the Nektar Stock Option Plan.
Subject to the approval of the Compensation Committee, you will be granted an option to purchase 80,000 shares in accordance with this plan. The price of the shares from the Stock Option Plan will be set at the closing price of Nektar’s stock
on the day preceding your date of hire. You will also be eligible to participate in Nektar’s benefits program including Medical, Dental and Vision Insurance, Term Life Insurance, 401(k), Flexible Health Spending Account and Short & Long
Term Disability. 
  
 Nevan, we are delighted to offer you an opportunity to be
part of Nektar. As a key member of the Senior Management team, we expect you will play an important role in building our company. In a rapidly growing company like Nektar, quality and committed people like you are the major ingredients of success.

  
 Your employment is by continued mutual agreement and may be terminated without
cause by either you or the company at any time without any obligation or compensation by either party. 







 In compliance with the terms of the Federal Immigration Reform and Control Act, you will be required to provide us with
proof of authorization to work and proof of identity. 
  
 This offer is valid
through January 7, 2005 
  
 Sincerely, 
  

			
	 /s/ EG Frisby


	
	Elizabeth Frisby
	Vice President, Human Resources
	
	OFFER ACCEPTED:
		
	 /s/ Nevan Elam

	 	 1/3/05


	Nevan Elam	 	Date
		
	 1/17/05

	 	 
	Start Date
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6189

JIMMIE HUGENE WOODSON, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GOVERNOR JIM GILMORE; WARDEN ALTON BASKERVILLE, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-00-952-2) Submitted: March 9, 2001 Decided: March 20, 2001 Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jimmie H. Woodson, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Jimmie H. Woodson, Sr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Woodson v. Gilmore , No. CA-00-952-2 (E.D. Va. Jan. 23, 2001). Furthermore, we find this appeal frivolous for purposes of 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2), (g) (West Supp. 2000). We deny Woodson’s motions for release from incarceration, his motion for transfer, and his motion to dismiss counsel appointed by the State of Virginia. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
###### Editorial Note on Part 3406

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3406 appear at 76 FR 4809, Jan. 27, 2011.

#### § 3406.28 Confidential aspects of proposals and awards.

When a proposal results in a grant, it becomes a part of the record of the Agency's transactions, available to the public upon specific request. Information that the Secretary determines to be of a privileged nature will be held in confidence to the extent permitted by law. Therefore, any information that the applicant wishes to have considered as privileged should be clearly marked as such and sent in a separate statement, two copies of which should accompany the proposal. The original copy of a proposal that does not result in a grant will be retained by the Agency for a period of one year. Other copies will be destroyed. Such a proposal will be released only with the consent of the applicant or to the extent required by law. A proposal may be withdrawn at any time prior to the final action thereon.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 06939

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 06939\06939_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

06939\06939_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

06939\06939_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 06939\06939_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06939\06939_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06939\06939_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06939\06939_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06939\06939_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

06939\Certification Statement Plant ID 06939.pdf Plant certification statement

x 06939\Follow-up\Follow-up Questions - Steam Electric Questionnaire (Plant 0.docx Draft Questions for Follow Up

x 06939\Follow-up\Letter.docx Draft Questions for Follow Up

x 06939\Supplemental Documents\06939_Part A5-2 Map-1_Sundt.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 06939\Supplemental Documents\06939_Part A5-3_Sundt.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 06939\Supplemental Documents\06939_Part D3-1_Sundt.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
U.S. Department of StateBackground Notes: Iceland, June 1997
Released by the Bureau of European and Canadian Affairs, June30, 1997.
Official Name: Republic of Iceland
**PROFILE**
**Geography**
Area: 102,845 sq. km. (39, 709 sq. miles); about the size of Virginiaor twice the size of Ireland.
LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF CANTERBURY INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC.


Canterbury Career Schools, Inc. (inactive)
Canterbury Career Schools of Sacramento, Inc. (inactive)
Canterbury Career Schools of Pittsburgh, Inc. (inactive)
Canterbury Management Group, Inc.
Star Label Products, Inc. (shell)
Clark Training Corp. (inactive)
MSI/Canterbury Corp.
Empire Career Center, Inc. (inactive)
Canterbury Career Schools of Lauderdale (inactive)
CALC/Canterbury Corp.
Prosoft/Canterbury Corp. (inactive)
Nevada Training Corp. (inactive)
Vocational Education Corp. d/b/a American Trucking Academy(inactive)
ATM/Canterbury Corp.
USC/Canterbury Corp.
§ 3201.95 Shaving products. ( a ) *Definition.* Products designed for every step of the shaving process, including shaving creams, gels, soaps, lotions, and aftershave balms.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The Federal preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 92 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than November 19, 2013, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased shaving products. By that date, Federal agencies that have the responsibility for drafting or reviewing specifications for products to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased shaving products.
[77 FR 69386, Nov. 19, 2012]
Editorial Note on Part 3405
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3405 appear at 76 FR 4808, Jan. 27, 2011.

§ 3405.17 Grant awards. ( a ) *General.* Within the limit of funds available for such purpose, the authorized departmental officer shall make project grants to those responsible, eligible applicants whose proposals are judged most meritorious in the announced targeted need areas under the evaluation criteria and procedures set forth in this part. The beginning of the project period shall be no later than September 30 of the Federal fiscal year in which the project is approved for support. All funds granted under this part shall be expended solely for the purpose for which the funds are granted in accordance with the approved application and budget, the regulations of this part, the terms and conditions of the award, the applicable Federal cost principles, and 2 CFR part 200.
( b ) *Organizational management information.* Specific management information relating to a proposing institution shall be submitted on a one-time basis prior to the award of a project grant identified under this part if such information has not been provided previously under this or another program for which the sponsoring agency is responsible. Copies of the forms used to fulfill this requirement will be sent to the proposing institution by the sponsoring agency as part of the pre-award process.
( c ) *Notice of grant award.* The grant award document shall include at a minimum the following: ( 1 ) Legal name and address of performing organization.
( 2 ) Title of project.
( 3 ) Name(s) and address(es) of project director(s).
( 4 ) Identifying grant number assigned by the Department.
( 5 ) Project period, which specifies how long the Department intends to support the effort without requiring reapplication for funds.
( 6 ) Total amount of Federal financial assistance approved during the project period.
( 7 ) Legal authority(ies) under which the grant is awarded.
( 8 ) Approved budget plan for categorizing allocable project funds to accomplish the stated purpose of the grant award.
( 9 ) Other information or provisions deemed necessary by the Department to carry out its granting activities or to accomplish the purpose of this particular project grant.
( d ) *Obligation of the Federal Government.* Neither the approval of any application nor the award of any project grant shall legally commit or obligate NIFA or the United States to provide further support of a project or any portion thereof.
[62 FR 39317, July 22, 1997, as amended at 79 FR 75999, Dec. 19, 2014]
###### Editorial Note on Part 3401

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3401 appear at 76 FR 4806, Jan. 27, 2011.

#### § 3401.5 Indirect costs and tuition remission costs.

Pursuant to section 1473 of the National Agricultural Research, Extension, and Teaching Policy Act of 1977, as amended (7 U.S.C. 3319), funds made available under this program to recipients other than Federal laboratories shall not be subject to reduction for indirect costs or tuition remission costs. Since indirect costs and tuition remission costs, except in the case of Federal laboratories, are not allowable costs for purposes of this program, such costs may not be used to satisfy the matching requirement set forth in § 3401.4.
§ 2900.2 Definitions. ( a ) *Full food and fiber production* means the entire output of food and fiber produced for the domestic market, and for export, for building of reserves, and crops for soil building or conservation. This term also includes the processing of food and fiber into stable and storable products, and the maintenance of food quality after processing.
( b ) *Establishment* means an economic unit, generally at a single physical location where business is conducted or where service or industrial operations are performed (for example, a factory, mill, store, mine, farm, sales office, or warehouse). (Note: This is the same definition used in the Standard Industrial Classification Manual, 1972 edition).
( c ) *Essential Agricultural Use Establishment* means any Establishment, or the portion of an Establishment, which performs (or has the capability to perform) activities specified in § 2900.3.
( d ) *Current Natural Gas Requirements* means the amount of natural gas required by an Essential Agricultural Use Establishment to perform the activities devoted to full food and fiber production.
(Pub. L. 95-621, Nov. 8, 1979, 92 Stat. 3350, 15 U.S.C. 3301 *et seq.*)
[44 FR 28786, May 17, 1979, as amended at 46 FR 47216, Sept. 25, 1981]
#### SCHEINBERG, Respondent, v. SONKEN, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 15, 1906.)

In the matter of Abraham Scheinberg against Abraham Sonken, lienor. G. Lange, Jr., for appellant. B. F. Spellman, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed.
#### § 3300.70 Issuance of certificate.

The ATP manager will evaluate the documents received and, for equipment deemed qualified, will issue a U.S. ATP certificate to the applicant within 30 days of the receipt of an application and any relevant information required. The certificate will be in the format prescribed in ATP, Annex 1, Appendix 3. For equipment deemed not qualified, the applicant will be advised of the reasons for non-qualification within 30 days of the receipt of an application and any relevant information required.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 3 , 2017 

# Order

Clerk March 3 , 2017

153828 (64)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 153828

v COA: 324018

Wayne CC: 14

- 000152

- FC

THEODORE PAUL WAFER,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of plaintiff

- appellee to extend the time

for filing its supplemental brief is GRANTED IN PART. The supplemental brief will be

accepted as timely filed if submitted on or before March 28, 2017. The due date of

defendant

- appellant’s supplemental brief is also extended to March 28, 2017.
EXHIBIT 10.17


COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS WITH NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS


The following are the annual salaries of our named executive officers as of March 1, 2005.

	
  
Name
  	
   
 	
  
Position
  	
   
 	
  
    Salary
  	 
	
  



  	
   
 	
  



  	
   
 	
  



  	 
	
  
Kenneth G. Chahine, J.D., Ph.D.
  	
  
 
  	
  
President, Chief Executive   Officer and Director
  	
  
 
  	
  
$
  	376,550
	 
	
  Thomas J. Paulson
  	
  
 
  	
  
Vice President,   Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
  	
  
 
  	
  
$
  	260,441
	 
	
  
Glenn Pierce, Ph.D., M.D.
  	
  
 
  	
  
Vice President,   Research and Clinical Development
  	
  
 
  	
  
$
  	242,179
	 
	
  
Dawn McGuire, M.D.
  	
  
 
  	
  
Chief Medical Officer
  	
  
 
  	
  
$
  	243,950
	 
	
  
Kirk Johnson, Ph.D.
  	
  
 
  	
  
Vice President,   Preclinical Research
  	
  
 
  	
  
$
  	219,625
	 



In addition to these named executive officers, we have three other executive officers who receive base salaries in amount commensurate to their position and role with the Company.

Bonuses are paid to executive officers based on subjective determinations by the Compensation Committee of amounts warranted.  There are no target bonus amounts set.