[DO N OT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELE VENTH CIRCUIT

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ No. 1 2- 10 16 8 Non -Arg um en t Ca le nd ar

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Agen cy No. A0 96 -6 36 -2 16

MIC HAEL JARRETT, Pet it io ne r, ve rs us U.S. ATTO RNEY GENERAL, Res po nd en t.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Pet it io n fo r Rev ie w of aDeci si on of t he Bo ardof I m

m ig rat io n Ap pe al s

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ (Au gu st20 , 20 12 ) Befo re TJ OFLAT, PRYOR an d KRAVITC H, Circ ui t J ud ge s. PER CURI AM:

Case: 12-10168 Date Filed: 08/20/2012 Page: 1 of 4Mi ch ael Jarret t, a n at iv e an d c it iz enof J am ai ca, p et it io ns th is co urt fo r

rev ie w of the Bo ardof I m m ig rat io n Ap pe al s’s (B IA) d en ia l o f hi s m ot io n fo r reco ns id erat io n o f it s o rd er af firm in g t he Im

m ig rat io n J ud ge ’s (IJ ) pr et erm it ti ng hi s ap pl ic at io n fo r ad

jus tm en t o f st atus . After ath or ou gh rev ie w, we den y th e pe ti ti on . In20 01 , Jarret t en te redth e Uni te d S ta te s fr om Jamaica o n aC1 vi sato work on a sh ip as acrewm anforten m on th s, af te r whi chhe returne d t o J am ai ca. Usi ng th e sa m e v is a, he reen te redth e Uni te d S ta te s i n 2 00 2, b utco ul d n otfin d em pl oym en t h e li ke d a ndqu ic kl y returne d t o J am ai ca. WhenJarret t en te redth e Uni te d S tate s i n 2 00 3, h e ag ai n e nt eredon hi s cr ewm an ’s vi sa , bu t h e d idno t p lan to work , no r di d h e work, as a crewm an . Jarr et t re m ai ne d i n the U.S. with ou t au th or iz at io n a fte r th e ex pi rat io n o f hi s v is a. In20 05 , Jarret t m arri eda U.S. cit iz enan d m ov edto ad jus t h is st atus . Whi le hi s ap pl ic at io n was pe nd in g, the Depa rtment o f Hom el an d S ecu rit y is su eda no ti ce to ap pe ar, ch arg in g h im

as r em ov ab le un de r 8 U.S.C . § 1 22 7( a)(1 )(B) , andm ov ed to pre te rm itJarret t’s ap pl ic at io n fo r ad jus tm en t o f st atus be cau se Jarret t’s s ta tu s as a “ crewm an ” ren de redhi m eli gi bl e fo r ad

jus tm en t o f st atus . Jarr et t re sp on de d t ha t he was n otinfacta “ crewm an ” an d t hu s was eli gi bl e to ad jus t s tatu s. The IJ g ran te d t he go ve rn m en t’s m ot io n, fi nd in g t ha t J arre ttwas i ne li gi bl e 2 Case: 12-10168 Date Filed: 08/20/2012 Page: 2 of 4fo r ad

jus tm en t o f st atus be cau se he was a“ crewm an .” Se e 8 U.S.C. § 12 55 (c). Ja rret t ap pe al edto th e BIA, wh ic h a ffi rm edth e IJ ’s dec is io n a nddi sm is se d the ap pe al on Sep te m

be r 26 , 20 11 . Jarr et t d idno t p et it io n t hi s co urt fo r rev ie w of tha t de ci si on . Jarr et t fi le d ati m el y m ot io n fo r rec on si de rat io n wi th th e BIA, rei te rat in g hi s p rev io us arg um en ts th athe was n ota crewm an . On Dece m be r 20 , 20 11 , th e BIA d en ie d t he m ot io n fo r rec on si de rat io n. J arre ttfil eda ti m el y pe ti ti on for rev ie w inth is co urt o n J anua ry 11 , 20 12 , arg ui ng th atth e IJan d B IA erre d b y fin di ng hi m

st atut or il y

in el ig ib le foranad

jus tm en t o f st atus . An al ie n s eek in g re vi ew of a fi na l o rd er o f rem ov al m us t fi le a pe ti ti on for rev ie w inth is co urt wi th in 30 da y s o f th e is su an ce o f th e fi na l o rd er. 8 U.S.C. § 1 25 2( b) (1 ). The 3 0- day de ad li ne is “ m an da to ry

an d juris di ct io na l.” Daka ne v. U.S. Att ’y Gen ., 39 9 F .3d12 69 , 12 72 n.3 (11 th Cir . 20 05 ). The fi na li ty of a rem ov al ord er i s n otaffe ct edby the fil in g o f a m ot io n t o re co ns id er. Jagg erna uth v. U.S. Att ’y Gen ., 43 2 F .3d13 46 , 13 50 -5 1 (1 1t h C ir. 2 00 5) . Here, J arre ttfai le d t o fi le a ti m el y pe ti ti on for

rev ie w of the BIA’s Sep te m be r 26 ord er af

firm in g t he IJ’s d eci si on th athe was s ta tu to ril y in el ig ib le to ad jus t s ta tu s. Acco rd in gl y , we lac k juris di ct io n t o re vi ew th e Sep te m be r 26 ord er, an d we d is mis s J arre tt ’s pet it io n fo r rev ie w to th e ex te ntth atitch al le ng es th e de te rm in at io n t ha t h e was in el ig ib le to ad jus t s ta tu s. Se e Dak

an e , 39 9 F .3dat 3 Case: 12-10168 Date Filed: 08/20/2012 Page: 3 of 412 72 n.3 .

Add it io na ll y , inhi s p et it io n fo r rev ie w, Jarr et t fa il s t o o fferany arg um en t ch al le ng in g t he de ni al of h is m ot io n fo r rec on si de rat io n. Th eref or e, Ja rret t h as ab an do ne d t hi s i ss ue . Becau se th e d en ia l o f th e m ot io n fo r rec on si de rat io n was th e o nl y is su e p ro pe rly befo re u s, we d en y th e p et it io n fo r rev ie w onth is gro un d. Se e S ep ulved a v . U.S. Att ’y Gen . , 40 1 F .3d12 26 , 12 28 n.2 (11 th Cir . 20 05 ) (p ro vi di ng th atis su es no t ra is edon ap pe al are d eem edab an do ne d) . PETI TI ON DENI ED .

4 Case: 12-10168 Date Filed: 08/20/2012 Page: 4 of 4