alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Second Department,

April, 1969

(April 7, 1969)

#### Louise Elliott, as Administratrix of the Estate of Tucker Hamlin, Deceased, Respondent, v. Meyer Tempkin et al., Doing Business as Park Nursing Home, Appellants.

In an action to recover damages for conscious pain and suffering and wrongful death, defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered May 31,1968, in favor of plaintiff upon a jury verdict. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, and new trial granted in the interests of justice, with costs to abide the event. In our opinion, a new trial is warranted to develop further the question of how much time elapsed .between the time when defendants’ nurse’s aid .placed plaintiff’s intestate in restraint on the commode and the time the fire began. On that subject the present proof included merely the deposition of the nurse’s aid who stated only that he did not' know how much time had elapsed between the two events. The proof also included evidence .that the nurse’s aid knew that the decedent was an occasional smoker, could use only one hand, and was otherwise immobile. The proof further showed that the decedent was an incontinent cardiovascular patient and that proper practice indicated that such patient could .be put on a commode and be given a few minutes privacy providing he is restrained. The Trial Judge properly charged the jury, without exception, that it was the duty of defendants to use reasonable care in looking after the safety of their patients. Under the circumstances, if the interval of time were adequately defined, the jury might well consider the knowledge of the nurse’s aid and find that it was imprudent of him to leave the decedent unattended and restrained on the commode, while he (the aid) was busy preparing and serving lunch for other patients. It seems to us, in a death ease where the plaintiff is not held *532to as high a degree of proof as where an injured plaintiff is available to testify *(Noseworthy*v. *City of New York,*298 N. Y. 76), that -the foregoing evidence spells out a prima facie ease and a jury question. 'Christ, Acting P. J., Rabin and Martuseello, JJ., concur; Brennan, J., dissents in part and votes to reverse the judgment and dismiss the complaint, with the following memorandum, in which Munder, J., concurs: The decedent’s death resulted from bums received when his clothing caught fire while he was seated on a commode in his room in defendants’ nursing home. Viewing the facts most favorably to plaintiff *(Commissio*v. *Meeker,*8 N Y 2d 109,117) and in the light of the rule of *Noseworthy*v. *City of New York*(298 N. Y. 76, 80), I am unable to find any proof in the record from which it may he inferred that this unfortunate accident was due to defendants’ negligence (cf. *Wank*v. *Ambrosino,*307 N. Y. 321).
Exhibit 10.23
 
 st
 RECITALS
 WHEREAS,
 
   1. Purchase and Sale.
 2. Purchase Price.
   3. Farmers Reservoir and Irrigation Company Marshall Lake Division Assessments,
Transfer Fees, Closing Costs and Other Related Fees. Purchaser




---



##### 



4. Date and Time of Closing.
 5. Additional Documents and Dry-up Covenant.
 6. Water Court Proceedings.
 7. Sellers Representations and Warranties.
 8. Binding Effect.
 9. Attorneys Fees and Costs.
 10. Counterparts and Facsimile Signatures.
 11. Due Diligence.
 Valid Decrees:
 Abandonment.
 Adverse Claims.




---



##### 



No Agreements.
 Ownership in Fee; Encumbrances.
 No Prior Sales.
 Historical Use.
 Notice of Defect: Cure; Termination.
  SELLER:
    
    
    
    PURCHASER:RON OPATRIL
    
    
    
    ELDORADO SPRINGSBy:
    
    /s/ Ron Opatril
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Douglas A. LarsonDecember 14, 2007
    
    
    
    January 11, 2008




---



##### 



th
     /s/ Ronald OpatrilRonald Opatril STATE OF ARIZONA) SS.COUNTY OF MARICOPA)
 th Ronald Opatril.
   /s/ Terri L. Norton

Terri L. Norton
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO. 4:93cr4018-WS

MARTALIUS WILLIAMS, DOCKET NO. 4:05mj154-WCS

Defendant.

 / 

O R D E R

The Defendant appeared before the undersigned on a first appearance today

to answer to the charges of violating his supervised release. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Defendant shall appear before Senior

Judge Stafford on January 26, 2006, beginning at 2:00 P.M., for a revocation

hearing. Until that appearance, Defendant will remain subject to the conditions of

supervised release. 

DONE AND ORDERED on December 13, 2005.

 S/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 4:93-cr-04018-WS Document 58 Filed 12/13/05 Page 1 of 1
Order entered August 18, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01588-CR

EDWARD DERELL HARMON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F13-54014-I

ORDER

The Court DENIES appellant’s August 14, 2014 motion for bench warrant.

We ORDER the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Edward Derell 

Harmon, TDCJ No. 1891908, Polunsky Unit, 3872 FM 350 South, Livingston, Texas, 77351.

/s/ MOLLY FRANCIS 

JUSTICE
§ 2502.7 Responsibilities of grantees. Each grantee is responsible for providing services and/or benefits authorized by this program in accord with a service delivery strategy described in its approved grant plan. The services must reflect the needs of the relevant farmworker population in the area to be served and be consistent with the goals of assisting farmworkers in securing, retaining, upgrading, or returning from agricultural jobs. The necessary components of a service delivery strategy and grant plan will be fully set forth in an RFP but the plan shall include, at a minimum, the following: ( a ) The employment and education needs of the farmworker population to be served;
( b ) The manner in which the proposed services to be delivered will assist agricultural employers and farmworkers in securing, retaining, upgrading or returning from agricultural jobs;
( c ) The manner in which the proposed services will be coordinated with other available services;
( d ) The number of participants the grantee expects to serve for each service provided, the results expected and the anticipated expenditures for each category of service.
Case 5:19-cr-00068-TKW-MAL Document 31 Filed 09/03/20 Page 1 of 5
Case 5:19-cr-00068-TKW-MAL Document 31 Filed 09/03/20 Page 2 of 5
Case 5:19-cr-00068-TKW-MAL Document 31 Filed 09/03/20 Page 3 of 5
Case 5:19-cr-00068-TKW-MAL Document 31 Filed 09/03/20 Page 4 of 5
Case 5:19-cr-00068-TKW-MAL Document 31 Filed 09/03/20 Page 5 of 5
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Millennium Challenge Corporation

          - [MCC FR 10-15]

# AGENCY:

Millennium Challenge Corporation.

# TIME AND DATE: 

10 a.m. to 12 p.m., Wednesday, December 15, 2010.

# PLACE: 

Department of State, 2201 C Street, NW., Washington, DC 20520.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Information on the meeting may be obtained from Melvin Williams, Jr., Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary via e-mail at                         *Corporatesecretary@mcc.gov*                         or by telephone at (202) 521-3600.                    

# STATUS: 

Meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

The Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the Millennium Challenge Corporation (“MCC”) will hold a meeting to consider the selection of countries that will be eligible for FY 2011 Millennium Challenge Account (“MCA”) assistance under Section 607 of the Millennium Challenge Act of 2003 (the “Act”), codified at 22 U.S.C. 7706; discussion of the Malawi Compact; and certain administrative matters. The agenda items are expected to involve the consideration of classified information and the meeting will be closed to the public.

Dated: November 19, 2010.

Melvin F. Williams, Jr.,

VP/General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, Millennium Challenge Corporation.

[FR Doc. 2010-29648 Filed 11-19-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 9211-03-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6605

CHARLES H. TRAMMELL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DONALD R. GUILLORY, Former Warden; L. W.

COLLINS, Hearing Officer,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-98-199-AM)

Submitted: July 30, 1998 Decided: August 26, 1998

Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles H. Trammell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles H. Trammell appeals from the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. Trammell v. Guillory, No. CA-98-

199-AM (E.D. Va. Mar. 20, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 29.3565 Unstemmed.

A form of tobacco, including whole leaf and leaf scrap, from which the stems or midribs have not been removed.

[30 FR 9207, July 23, 1965. Redesignated at 49 FR 16759, Apr. 20, 1984]
Case 3:98-cr-00105-RV Document 81 Filed 06/14/05 Page 1 of 1
# L_2020434EN.01002901.xml

| 23.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 434/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 434/29

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2020/2194

of 16 December 2020

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Milas Zeytinyağı’ (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Turkey’s application to register the name ‘Milas Zeytinyağı’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Turkey’s application to register the name ‘Milas Zeytinyağı’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Milas Zeytinyağı’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Milas Zeytinyağı’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Milas Zeytinyağı’ (PDO) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.5. Oils and fats (butter, margarine, oil, etc.), as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 December 2020.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 270, 17.8.2020, p. 7.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc. (the “Registrant”) onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)     The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)     The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Registrant.

 
| Date: August 10,  2009 | By:                                   | /s/ Arthur F. Helf |
|-----------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------------------|
|                        | Arthur F. Helf                        |
|                        | Chairman and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Robert J. Krakauer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2006



|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Krakauer                                                     
|Robert J. Krakauer                                                         
|Executive Vice President, Corporate Operations, and
Chief Financial Officer
#### § 29.6003 Body.

The thickness and density of a leaf or the weight per unit of surface. (See chart.)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Alliance Financial Corporation (the
Company) for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jack H. Webb, Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: April 30, 2009



/s/    Jack H. WebbName: Jack H. WebbTitle: Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 10.35**

 

 

March 25, 2002

 

**(Sentvia Fax (714-573-3494)**

 

Larry Batina

Chief Financial Officer andChief Operating Officer

Naturade, Inc.

14370 Myford Rd.

Irvine, CA 92606

 

Re: Waiver

 

Dear Larry,

 

*Agreement: The Credit and Security Agreement signed and datedJanuary 27, 2000 and amended.*

 

Wells FargoBusiness Credit, Inc. has decided to waive our default rights throughDecember 31, 2001 under the Agreement with respect to the breach ofSection 6.12 and 6.13, Minimum Book Net Worth Plus Subordinated ConvertibleDebt and Minimum Net Income.

 

For waivingthe above covenants Wells Fargo Business Credit, Inc. will charge Naturade$1,000.

 

Please note,that the above waiver applies only to the specific instance described above. Itis not a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same provision of theAgreement, nor is it a waiver of any breach of any other provision of theAgreement.

 

Except asexpressly stated in this letter, we reserve all of the rights, powers andremedies available to us under the Agreement and any other contracts orinstruments signed by you, including the right to cease making advances to youand the right to accelerate any of your indebtedness, if any subsequent breachof the same provision or any other provision of the Agreement should occur.

 

Sincerely,

 
| /s/ Tom  Makowski                  |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|
|                               |
| Tom Makowski                       |
| Portfolio  Manager                 |
| Wells Fargo  Business Credit, Inc. |

 

----
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsSEAPAK user's guide, version 2.0. Volume 1: System descriptionThe SEAPAK is a user interactive satellite data analysis package that was developed for the processing and interpretation of Nimbus-7/Coastal Zone Color Scanner (CZCS) and the NOAA Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) data. Significant revisions were made to version 1.0 of the guide, and the ancillary environmental data analysis module was expanded. The package continues to emphasize user friendliness and user interactive data analyses. Additionally, because the scientific goals of the ocean color research being conducted have shifted to large space and time scales, batch processing capabilities for both satellite and ancillary environmental data analyses were enhanced, thus allowing large quantities of data to be ingested and analyzed in background.Document ID19910016369Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsMcclain, Charles R.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD., United States)*Darzi, Michael*(General Sciences Corp. Laurel, MD., United States)*Firestone, James K.*(General Sciences Corp. Laurel, MD., United States)*Fu, Gary*(General Sciences Corp. Laurel, MD., United States)*Yeh, Eueng-Nan*(General Sciences Corp. Laurel, MD., United States)*Endres, Daniel L.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1991Subject CategoryComputer Programming And SoftwareReport/Patent NumberREPT-91B00090-VOL-1NAS 1.15:100728-VOL-1NASA-TM-100728-VOL-1Accession Number91N25683Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910016369.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024