alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          38,887
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             551
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                20,118
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    109,879
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          65,949
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            67,545
<LOANS>                                        680,023
<ALLOWANCE>                                      8,603
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 943,126
<DEPOSITS>                                     822,189
<SHORT-TERM>                                    12,194
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             11,828
<LONG-TERM>                                     10,833
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            5,836
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      80,055
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  85,892
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 61,654
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               10,322
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   620
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                72,596
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              30,307
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              32,209
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           40,387
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,599
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  37
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 26,512
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,784
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      16,784
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,357
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.96
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.96
<LOANS-NON>                                      5,698
<LOANS-PAST>                                       210
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   481
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 7,752
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      925
<RECOVERIES>                                       177
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                8,603
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             8,603
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS

*June*7, *2006*

[Cite as *06/07/2006 Case Announcements,*2006-Ohio-2762.]

MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS

2006-0710.

#### McDaniel v. Lynch.

In Prohibition. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-92,584-01

EX P ARTE WILL IE BRADY, Appli cant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. D-1-D C-15-206960- A IN THE 450 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM TRAVIS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Applicant pleade d g uilty to ag g rava ted assault/family violence and was sentenc ed to twenty

five y ear s’ imprisonment. He did not appea l his conviction. Applicant filed this application for a writ of habea s corpus in the county of convic tion, and the district c lerk forwa rded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. Applicant conte nds that plea wa s involuntary beca use trial counse l failed to inform him of

a plea offe r of 15 y ear s, failed to proper ly inform him of the law reg arding enhanc ements, failed to challeng e the discrepa

ncy between the name of the complainant on the indictment and the name pres en t ed b y prosec utors at trial, failed to discuss the law on self-de fense , failed to proper ly investiga te, and failed to inform him that by pleading g uilty he was waiving h i s ri gh t t o appea l.2

Applicant has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle h i m to relief

. Hill v. Lockhart , 474 U.S. 52 (1985); Ex parte Argent , 393 S.W .3d 781 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). Acc ording ly , the rec ord should be develope d. The trial court is the appropr iate forum for finding s of fac t. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall o rd er t ri al co unsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. I n developing the rec ord, the trial court may use any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). I f the trial court elec ts to hold a hear ing, it shall deter m i n e wh et h er Appl icant is indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wants to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to repr esent him at the hear ing. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. I f counsel is appointed or reta ined, the trial court shall immediately

notify this Court of counsel’s name

. The trial court shall make finding s of fac t and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel’s perf ormanc e was defic ient and Appl i ca n t would have insisted on a trial but for counsel’s alleg ed defic ient perf

ormanc e. The trial court may make a ny other finding s and conc lusions that it deems appropr iate in re sponse to Applicant’s c laims. The trial court shall make findings of fac t and conclusions of l aw within ninety d ay s from the date of this order

. The district cler k shall then immediately forwa rd to this Court the trial court’s finding s and conclusions and the rec ord develope d on rema nd, including, among other things, aff idavit s , motions, objections, proposed finding s and conclusions, order s, and transcr ipts from hear ings and depositions. See T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 4). Any extensions of time must be reque sted by the trial cour

t and obtained f

rom this Court.

Filed: May 12, 2021 Do not publish
NASRA M. ARAFAT,

Appellant,

v.

RECEIVER OF SEMINOLE 

CASUALTY INS. CO., 

FLORIDA CORPORATION,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-5823

_____________________________/

Opinion filed April 6, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

George S. Reynolds, Judge.

Nasra M. Arafat, pro se, Appellant.

Yamile Benitez-Torviso, Florida Department of Financial Services, Doral, for 

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, BILBREY, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, Douglas P. Collier, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Volcom, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: May 10, 2006 /s/ Douglas P. Collier     Douglas P. Collier  Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer  (Principal Financial Officer)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-7105
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JOSEPH RICKY DODD, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:96-cr-00153-HCM-2) Submitted: August 14, 2008 Decided: August 22, 2008 Before MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph Ricky Dodd, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Pellatiro Tayman, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Joseph Ricky Dodd appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Dodd , No. 2:96-cr-00153-HCM-2 (E.D. Va. filed May 21, 2008; entered May 23, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of BlackRock Kelso Capital Corporation (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), James R. Maher, as Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and Corinne Pankovcin, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition
and consolidated results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ James R. Maher   
|Name:                 |  | James R. Maher         
|Title:                |  | Chief Executive Officer
|Date:                 |  | November 7, 2013       
|                     
|/s/ Corinne Pankovcin
|Name:                 |  | Corinne Pankovcin      
|Title:                |  | Chief Financial Officer
|Date:                 |  | November 7, 2013
#### § 2710.1 General statement.

This part is issued in accordance with 7 CFR 1.4 of the U.S. Department of Agriculture regulations governing the availability of records (7 CFR 1.1-1.16 and Appendix A) under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552). The Department's regulations, as supplemented by the regulations in this part, provide guidance for any person wishing to request records from the Office of Information Resources Management (OIRM).
#### Eagle Insurance Company, Respondent, v Edgar Sabbeth Plywood & Flooring Corp., Appellant. (And a Third-Party Action.)

In an action by an insurance company for restitution of a claim paid to an insured, the defendant appeals (by permission) from an order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court for the Ninth and Tenth Judicial Districts, dated November 16, 1978, which, *inter alia,*(1) reversed an order of the First District Court, Mineóla, Nassau County, entered May 23, 1978, denying summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff, and (2) granted the motion for summary judgment in favor of plaintiff. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Defendant, Edgar Sabbeth Plywood & Flooring Corp., a supplier of specialized wood and lumber, filed a claim with plaintiff, its insurer, with respect to what was believed to be a lost shipment of oak flooring intended for the third-party defendant, Hall Flooring Corp. Plaintiff, upon investigation, paid the full claim less a $250 deductible. It is now conceded by all parties, however, that subsequent to plaintiffs payment of the claim, the shipment of oak flooring believed lost (and which “loss” *608plaintiff had reimbursed against), was ascertained to have been actually delivered to the third-party defendant, albeit very late. Under these circumstances, we agree with the Appellate Term that summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff for restitution of the insurance proceeds paid was proper (see 18 Couch, Insurance [2d ed], § 74.189, pp 363-364; cf. *Schleider v Maryland Cas. Co.,*226 App Div 50, 52, affd without opn 252 NY 598). Mangano, J. P., Gulotta, Cohalan and Gibbons, JJ., concur.
#### § 1957.5 [Reserved]
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T20:42:13-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
#### UNITED STATES TRUST CO. v. DANIEL et al.

(No. 5790.)

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July 10, 1914.)

Appeal from Special Term, New York County.

Action by the United States Trust Company of New York against Anna K. Daniel, impleaded with others. From an order denying a motion to set aside a sale of property on the judgment of foreclosure, defendant named appeals.

Order affirmed.

See, also, 142 App. Div. 935, 127 N. Y. Supp. 1148.

Argued before INGRAHAM, P. J., and CLARKE, SCOTT, DOWLING, and HOTCHKISS, JJ.

Anna K. Daniel, of New York City, pro se.

Stewart & Shearer, of New York City, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant has appealed from a number of orders entered at Special Term denying various motions to set aside the sale of the premises sold under the judgment in this action and for other relief. As the defendant has appeared in person and seems to be impressed with the fact that she has been unjustly treated by the court below, the whole records have been carefully examined to see if there was any injustice or if the courts could give to the defendant any relief. In consequence of the lack of any professional advice as to the rights of the defendant, the records have come to us in such a condition that it is hardly possible to discuss any of the questions involved in an opinion; but, after the most careful attention that we can give to these records, it is apparent that the plaintiff has proceeded according to law, that the sales were regular, that the purchasers of the property at the sale were entitled to the possession of the property, and that no injustice has been done to the defendant.

The order appealed from denying the defendant’s motion to set aside the sale is therefore affirmed, without costs.
#### § 29.2253 Body.

The thickness and density of a leaf or the weight per unit of surface. (See chart, § 29.2351.)
##### 



EXHIBIT 12.1
 RULE 13A-14(A) CERTIFICATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of the Company;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the Company and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding
the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting;
and




---



##### 



5.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of
the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Edward Dolejsi
#### § 301.85-2b [Reserved]
Case 3:95-cr-03089-RV   Document 1174   Filed 08/04/06   Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     The schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted from the
December  31, 1999  financial  statements  and is  qualified  in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                           0000795445
<NAME>                 ADVANCED MACHINE VISION CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                          1000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               5,889
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        1,806
<ALLOWANCES>                                           205
<INVENTORY>                                          8,399
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    16,965
<PP&E>                                               8,174
<DEPRECIATION>                                       3,314
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      28,020
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                6,024
<BONDS>                                              6,294
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                2,579
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            26,103
<OTHER-SE>                                         (12,980)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        28,020
<SALES>                                             24,312
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    24,312
<CGS>                                               12,212
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       26,638
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     569
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (2,895)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (2,895)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (2,895)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.24)


</TABLE>
#### § 2018.253 Indexes.

Since Rural Development does not maintain any materials to which 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(2) applies, it maintains no indexes.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Southern National Bancorp of Virginia, Inc. (SNBV) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial officer of SNBV hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that based on their knowledge and
belief: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of SNBV as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



|                                           
|-------------------------------------------
|/s/ Georgia S. Derrico                     
|Georgia S. Derrico, Chief Executive Officer
|                                           
|/s/ William H. Lagos                       
|William H. Lagos, Chief Financial Officer  



August 14, 2009