alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2259 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2259

   To withdraw certain Federal land and interests in that land from 
location, entry, and patent under the mining laws and disposition under 
 the mineral and geothermal leasing laws and to preserve existing uses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 5, 2013

  Mr. Daines introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To withdraw certain Federal land and interests in that land from 
location, entry, and patent under the mining laws and disposition under 
 the mineral and geothermal leasing laws and to preserve existing uses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``North Fork Watershed Protection Act 
of 2013''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Eligible federal land.--The term ``eligible Federal 
        land'' means--
                    (A) any federally owned land or interest in land 
                depicted on the Map as within the North Fork Federal 
                Lands Withdrawal Area; or
                    (B) any land or interest in land located within the 
                North Fork Federal Lands Withdrawal Area that is 
                acquired by the Federal Government after the date of 
                enactment of this Act.
            (2) Map.--The term ``Map'' means the Bureau of Land 
        Management map entitled ``North Fork Federal Lands Withdrawal 
        Area'' and dated June 9, 2010.

SEC. 3. WITHDRAWAL.

    (a) Withdrawal.--Subject to valid existing rights, the eligible 
Federal land is withdrawn from--
            (1) all forms of location, entry, and patent under the 
        mining laws; and
            (2) disposition under all laws relating to mineral leasing 
        and geothermal leasing.
    (b) Availability of Map.--Not later than 30 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Map shall be made available to the public at 
each appropriate office of the Bureau of Land Management.

SEC. 4. EXISTING USES NOT AFFECTED.

    Except with respect to the withdrawal under section 3, nothing in 
this Act restricts recreational uses, livestock management activities, 
or forest management activities allowed on the date of the enactment of 
this Act on the eligible Federal land in accordance with applicable 
law.
                                 <all>
```
#### Town House St., LLC, Respondent, v New Fellowship Full Gospel Baptist Church, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

[814 NYS2d 555]

In an action, inter alia, for the partition and sale of real property, the defendant New Fellowship Full Gospel Baptist Church appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Polizzi, J.), entered June 16, 2005, which denied its motion to renew and reargue a motion to vacate an interlocutory judgment of partition and sale of the same court, dated September 15, 2004, entered upon its default in answering or appearing, to vacate that default, and for leave to interpose an answer.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order entered June 16, 2005, as denied that branch of the appellant’s motion which was for reargument is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the order entered June 16, 2005, is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondent.

The appeal from so much of the order as denied that branch of the appellant’s motion which was for reargument is dismissed because no appeal lies from the denial of reargument *(see Bellantoni v Kelligrew,*26 AD3d 401 [2006]; *Frisenda v X Large*
      *895
      *Enters.,*280 AD2d 514 [2001]; *Sallusti v Jones,*273 AD2d 293, 294 [2000]).

The court properly denied that branch of the appellant’s motion which sought renewal because the appellant failed to present “new facts not offered on the prior motion that would change the prior determination” (CPLR 2221 [e] [2]; *see Matter of Rush v County of Nassau,*24 AD3d 560, 561 [2005]; *Matter of Orange & Rockland Util, v Assessor of Town of Haverstraw,*304 AD2d 668, 669 [2003]).

In light of the foregoing determination, we do not need to address the appellant’s remaining contentions. Miller, J.P., Ritter, Luciano, Spolzino and Dillon, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 99.2




				Exhibit 99(ii)

			    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
				 18 U.S.C. ss.1350
			     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
		    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report  of   Nutek,  Inc. (the "Company")
on   Form  10-KSB for the  year  ended  December 31,  2003  as   filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date  therein specified (the "Report")
"Report"),  I,  Jason F. Griffith, Chief  Financial   Officer  of  the  Company,
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted  pursuant to  Section  906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of  Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in  all
material respects,  the financial condition and  results  of  operations of  the
Company.


                                    /s/ Jason F. Griffith, CPA
                                    -------------------------------------------
                                    JASON F. GRIFFITH, Chief Financial Officer

Dated: March 30, 2004
Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. Case Nos. 3:99cr77/LAC/CJK

3:15cv371/LAC/CJK

TYRELL PLAIR

_____________________________/

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated August 24, 2015 (doc. 169). Defendant has been furnished a copy of the

Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to

Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the timely

filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the objections thereto timely filed,

I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence (doc. 167) is summarilyDENIED

and DISMISSED.

2. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 15 day of September, 2015. th

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:99-cr-00077-LC-CJK Document 171 Filed 09/15/15 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT**

**RULES 13A – 14 AND 15D -14 AS ADOPTED**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Belen Ramos, the Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annualreport on Form 10-KSB (the “Annual Report”) of Dynatem, Inc. (the “Company”); 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this Annual Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Annual Report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this Annual Report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this Annual Report; 

 

4. The Company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controlsand procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Annual Report was being prepared; 

 

(b) Omitted; 

 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Annual Reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(d) Disclosed in this Annual Report any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter, in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

 

5. The Company’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the Company’s board of directors: 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Dated: August 26, 2005
§ 3201.94 Lotions and moisturizers. ( a ) *Definition.* Creams and oils used to soften and treat damaged skin.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The Federal preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 59 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than November 19, 2013, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased lotions and moisturizers. By that date, Federal agencies that have the responsibility for drafting or reviewing specifications for products to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased lotions and moisturizers.
[77 FR 69386, Nov. 19, 2012]
§ 28.950 Terms defined. As used throughout this subpart, unless the context otherwise requires, the following terms shall be construed, respectively, to mean: ( a ) *Regulations.* Regulations mean the provisions in this subpart.
( b ) *Service.* The Agricultural Marketing Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
( c ) *Administrator.* The Administrator of the Agricultural Marketing Service, or any officer or employee of the Service, to whom authority has been delegated to act for the Administrator.
( d ) *Division.* The Cotton Division of the Agricultural Marketing Service.
( e ) *Director.* The Director of the Cotton Division, or any officer or employee of the Division to whom authority has been delegated to act for the Director.
( f ) *Laboratories.* Laboratories of the Cotton Division that perform the fiber and processing tests described in this subpart.
[35 FR 8532, June 3, 1970, as amended at 46 FR 30073, June 5, 1981; 46 FR 51593, Oct. 21, 1981]
§ 3201.38 Firearm cleaners, lubricants, and protectants. ( a ) *Definition.* Products that are designed to care for firearms by cleaning, lubricating, protecting, or any combination thereof. Examples include products that are designed for use in firearms to reduce the friction and wear between the moving parts of a firearm, to keep the weapon clean, and/or to prevent the formation of deposits that could cause the weapon to jam.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The Federal preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 32 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance dates.* No later than July 6, 2020, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased firearm cleaners, lubricants, and protectants. By that date, Federal agencies responsible for drafting or reviewing specifications for products to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased firearm cleaners, lubricants, and protectants.
[84 FR 32020, July 5, 2019]
EXHIBIT 32.1

        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with Igene Biotechnology, Inc. (the "Company")
Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended  December
31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the  date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen F. Hiu, President  of
the  Company,  certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934, as amended; and

          (2)  The  information  contained in the  Report  fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:     May 1, 2008      By: /S/  STEPHEN F. HIU
                               __________________________________
                                    STEPHEN F. HIU
                                    President
                                    (principal executive officer)


A  signed original of this written statement required by  Section
906  has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company  and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of Volcom, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Richard R. Woolcott, as Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, and Douglas P. Collier, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
knowledge:



| | (i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Volcom, Inc. and will be retained
by Volcom, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                                                                            
|----------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 9, 2009 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Richard R. Woolcott                                                                                                    
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | Richard R. Woolcott Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)                                     
|                        |  |  | 
|Dated: November 9, 2009 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Douglas P. Collier                                                                                                     
|                        |  |  |  |  |  | Douglas P. Collier Executive
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)

The foregoing certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350. These certifications shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall they be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
97- 971.

#### State ex rel. Santino v. Indus. Comm.

Franklin App. No. 96APD05-574. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. Upon consideration of appellants’ application for dismissal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
###### Editorial Note on Part 3405

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3405 appear at 76 FR 4808, Jan. 27, 2011.

#### § 3405.13 When and where to submit a proposal.

The program announcement will provide the deadline date for submitting a proposal, the number of copies of each proposal that must be submitted, and the address to which proposals must be submitted.
Case 4:19-cv-00512-MW-CAS   Document 1   Filed 10/15/19   Page 1 of 16

Case 4:19-cv-00512-MW-CAS   Document 1   Filed 10/15/19   Page 2 of 16

Case 4:19-cv-00512-MW-CAS   Document 1   Filed 10/15/19   Page 3 of 16

• 

• 

• 

• 

Case 4:19-cv-00512-MW-CAS   Document 1   Filed 10/15/19   Page 4 of 16

Case 4:19-cv-00512-MW-CAS   Document 1   Filed 10/15/19   Page 5 of 16

Case 4:19-cv-00512-MW-CAS   Document 1   Filed 10/15/19   Page 6 of 16

Case 4:19-cv-00512-MW-CAS   Document 1   Filed 10/15/19   Page 7 of 16

Case 4:19-cv-00512-MW-CAS   Document 1   Filed 10/15/19   Page 8 of 16

Case 4:19-cv-00512-MW-CAS   Document 1   Filed 10/15/19   Page 9 of 16

Case 4:19-cv-00512-MW-CAS   Document 1   Filed 10/15/19   Page 10 of 16

Case 4:19-cv-00512-MW-CAS   Document 1   Filed 10/15/19   Page 11 of 16

Case 4:19-cv-00512-MW-CAS   Document 1   Filed 10/15/19   Page 12 of 16

Case 4:19-cv-00512-MW-CAS   Document 1   Filed 10/15/19   Page 13 of 16

Case 4:19-cv-00512-MW-CAS   Document 1   Filed 10/15/19   Page 14 of 16

Case 4:19-cv-00512-MW-CAS   Document 1   Filed 10/15/19   Page 15 of 16

Carlos J. Burruezo, Esq. 

4828-0415-8889, v. 1

Case 4:19-cv-00512-MW-CAS   Document 1   Filed 10/15/19   Page 16 of 16
#### In the Matter of Jean-Francois de B. de Gautret, Respondent, v. Emily King de B. de Gautret, Appellant.

Order and judgment (one paper) *518entered on February 18, 1969, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements, on the opinion of Special Term. No opinion. Concur — Eager, J. F., MeGivern, Markewich, Nunez and Steuer, JJ.
# C_2022021EN.01000701.xml

| 14.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 21/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 21/7

---

Corrigendum to Joint statement by the European Parliament and by the Council and to Statement by the Commission

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 523 of 28 December 2021
  )

(2022/C 21/06)

| 1. | On the cover page, the header and the title: |
| --- | --- |

1.

for:

‘II (Information)

JOINT DECLARATIONS

Council

Joint statement by the European Parliament and by the Council

Statement by the Commission’,

read:

‘II (Information)

JOINT DECLARATIONS

European Parliament

Council

European Commission

Statements on Decision (EU) 2021/2316 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 December 2021 on a European Year of Youth (2022)’.

| 2. | On page 1, the text is replaced by the following: |
| --- | --- |

2.

On page 1, the text is replaced by the following:

II (Information)

JOINT DECLARATIONS

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

COUNCIL

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

Statements on Decision (EU) 2021/2316 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 December 2021 on a European Year of Youth (2022) (*1)

(2021/C 523/01)

Joint statement by the European Parliament and the Council

The European Parliament and the Council agree that the minimum operational budget for the implementation of the European Year of Youth (2022) shall be set at EUR 8 million. Of that amount, EUR 3 million will come from the annual budget for 2022 of the European Solidarity Corps and EUR 5 million will come from the annual budget for 2022 of the Erasmus+ programme.

Furthermore, the co-legislators are committed to leaving a lasting legacy of the European Year, beyond 2022. Without prejudice to the powers of the budgetary authority, in accordance with Article 314 TFEU, any additional funding beyond 2022 should be identified within the MFF 2021-2027.

Statement by the Commission

The Commission takes note of the agreement of the co-legislators to introduce a minimum operational budget of EUR 8 million for the implementation of the European Year of Youth (2022), without prejudice to the possibility of complementary contributions from other relevant Union programmes and instruments in addition to this amount of EUR 8 million.

In addition, the Commission will carry out a mapping exercise throughout the Year and will regularly update it outlining the possible and actual contributions by EU programmes and instruments to the implementation of the European Year of Youth and reporting on the activities. The progress in the deployment of contributions by the Union programmes will be regularly presented to the European Parliament and the Council. These contributions should be considered as complementary and above the minimum operational budget of EUR 8 million.

| 3. | The text on page 2 is deleted. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The text on page 2 is deleted.

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ERVIN J. HORTON,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:89cv40216–WS/CAS

RANDALL A. HAND, et al.,

Defendants.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc.

142) docketed October 13, 2017. The magistrate judge recommends that Plaintiff’s

Rule 60 motion for relief from judgment be denied. Plaintiff has filed no objections

to the report and recommendation.

The court has reviewed the record and has determined that the magistrate

judge's report and recommendation should be adopted. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 142) is
Page 2 of 2

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order.

2. Plaintiff’s motion (doc. 138) for relief from judgment is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 14th day of November , 2017.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE