alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2298 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2298

To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services, in consultation 
   with the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, to 
 conduct a study on the public health and environmental impacts of the 
production, transportation, storage, and use of petroleum coke, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 6, 2013

   Mr. Peters of Michigan (for himself, Mr. Conyers, Mr. Levin, Mr. 
   Dingell, and Mr. Kildee) introduced the following bill; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services, in consultation 
   with the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, to 
 conduct a study on the public health and environmental impacts of the 
production, transportation, storage, and use of petroleum coke, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Petroleum Coke Transparency and 
Public Health Study Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds the following:
            (1) In Detroit, piles of petroleum coke have been stored in 
        the open air on the banks of the Detroit River.
            (2) Domestic production of petroleum coke is expected to 
        increase if the Keystone XL pipeline is constructed.
            (3) State regulators, communities, and industry 
        stakeholders would benefit from a complete understanding of 
        petroleum coke and the potential impact on public health 
        related to the production, transportation, storage, and use of 
        petroleum coke.

SEC. 3. STUDY OF PETROLEUM COKE PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL 
              IMPACTS.

    Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Secretary of Health and Human Services, in consultation with the 
Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, shall transmit to 
Congress the results of a study regarding the public health and 
environmental impacts of the production, transportation, storage, and 
use of petroleum coke.

SEC. 4. CONSOLIDATION OF PETROLEUM COKE RESEARCH.

    Not later than 120 days after the date of enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall compile and publish on 
a publicly available website the results of all federally conducted 
research related to the public health and environmental impacts of the 
production, transportation, storage, and use of petroleum coke.
                                 <all>
```
#### The State ex rel. Vallestero, Appellant, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellee.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Vallestero v. Indus. Comm.*(1998), 88 Ohio St.3d 390.]

(No. 97-631

Submitted August 19, 1998

Decided October 14, 1998.)

*Fell, Marcus & Koder Co., L.PA,*and *George N. Fell II,*for appellant.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Constance A Snyder,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Douglas, J., dissents.
EXHIBIT 32.1



August 9, 2007

Securities and Exchange
Commission

100 F Street, NE

Washington, DC 20549



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Lazard Group
LLC (the Registrant) hereby certifies that the Registrants quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|                                                      
|/s/    Bruce Wasserstein                              
|Bruce Wasserstein Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
[ARTICLE] 5
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   YEAR
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-2000
[PERIOD-END]                               DEC-31-2000
[CASH]                                         238,748
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                        0
[ALLOWANCES]                                         0
[INVENTORY]                                          0
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                                63,801
[PP&E]                                       4,682,887
[DEPRECIATION]                               1,804,893
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                               3,180,543
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                          630,328
[BONDS]                                              0
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[COMMON]                                     2,550,215
[OTHER-SE]                                           0
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                 3,180,543
[SALES]                                              0
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                               785,272
[CGS]                                                0
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                  656,568
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                                     0
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                              45,761
[INCOME-PRETAX]                                 82,943
[INCOME-TAX]                                         0
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                             82,943
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                    82,943
[EPS-BASIC]                                       3.82
[EPS-DILUTED]                                        0
</TABLE>
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

KATHERINE GRIFFIN,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:19cv497–WS/MAF

ANDREW W. SAUL, COMMISSIONER

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant.

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF

No. 34) docketed June 4, 2021. The magistrate judge recommends that the

Commissioner's decision to grant Plaintiff’s application for social security

disability benefits be affirmed. 

Having reviewed the matter, it is ORDERED:

1. The court ADOPTS and incorporates by reference into this order the

magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF No. 34).
Page 2 of 2

2. The Commissioner’s motion (ECF No. 33) to reopen and affirm the

Commissioner’s decision and for entry of judgment is GRANTED.

3. The Commissioner's decision to grant Plaintiff's application for benefits is

AFFIRMED.

4. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: "The decision of the

Commissioner is AFFIRMED."

DONE AND ORDERED this 1st day of July , 2021.

s/ William Stafford

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

ANTWAUN VONTRELL LEE,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:20-cv-59-AW-GRJ

U.S. DISTRICT COURT, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

I have considered the magistrate judge’s March 30, 2020 Report and 

Recommendation. ECF No. 5. I have also considered de novo the Plaintiff’s

objections. ECF No. 6. I have determined the Report and Recommendation should 

be adopted. It is now ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 5) is adopted and 

incorporated into this order.

2. The clerk will enter a judgment that says, “This case is dismissed.” 

3. The clerk will close the file.

SO ORDERED on April 13, 2020.

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge
#### Abraham Bookstein et al., Appellants, v Barbara A. Halvas, Respondent.

— In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated September 20, 1978, which denied their motion to set aside the jury verdict in favor of defendant and (2) a judgment of the same court, entered October 19, 1978, which is in favor of defendant and against them, upon the jury verdict. Appeal from the order dismissed (see *Matter of Aho,*39 NY2d 241, 248). Judgment affirmed. Defendant is awarded one bill of costs to cover both appeals. Plaintiffs’ witness was not permitted to testify as to his personal knowledge of the timing and sequence of the traffic lights at the intersection where the collision occurred. He had, however, testified that the light was red for him and must have been red for the defendant. Therefore, the excluded testimony did not affect a substantial right of the plaintiffs and does not require a reversal. There was a conflict in the testimony and the jury determined the questions of credibility. Lazer, J. P., Gibbons, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of American Tire Distributors Holdings, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his best knowledge:



| | (a) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 1, 2006 (the Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  |                                                         
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 15, 2006 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ RICHARD P. JOHNSON
|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  | Name: Richard P. Johnson                                
|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  | Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer             
|                       |  |  | 
|                       |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ DAVID L. DYCKMAN  
|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  | Name: David L. Dyckman                                  
|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                        |  | Title: Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
FLN (Rev. 3/2007) Deficiency Order Page 1 of 1

3:99cr29LAC - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs. JEAN CLAUDE JONASSAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs

JEAN CLAUDE JONASSAINT

Case No.3:99cr29LAC

ORDER

Your document, MOTION TO PRODUCE, was referred to the undersigned with the

following deficiencies:

The document does not have a Certificate of Service as required by Rule

5(b) and (d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, showing proper

service.

For these reasons, IT IS ORDERED that the document shall remain in the electronic

file, but the court will not consider it until you have corrected the above deficiencies. 

DONE and ORDERED this 23rd day of July, 2007.

s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:99-cr-00029-LC-MD Document 202 Filed 07/24/07 Page 1 of 1
# L_2021084DE.01002801.xml

| 11.3.2021 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 84/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2021

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 84/28

---

Berichtigung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) 2020/2193 der Kommission vom 16. Dezember 2020 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1178/2011 in Bezug auf die für Flugbesatzungen geforderten Kompetenzen und Ausbildungsmethoden und die Meldung, Analyse und Weiterverfolgung von Ereignissen in der Zivilluftfahrt

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 434 vom 23. Dezember 2020
  )

Seite 16, Anhang I Nummer 1 Buchstabe c zur Anfügung von Punkt FCL.035 Buchstabe a Absatz 4 Ziffer i in Anhang I Teil-FCL Abschnitt A der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1178/2011:

Anstatt:

| „i) | das betreffende Flugzeug oder der betreffende TMG gehört derselben Kategorie und Klasse an wie das Luftfahrzeug nach Teil-FCL, auf dem die anzurechnenden Flugstunden absolviert wurden;“ |
| --- | --- |

„i)

das betreffende Flugzeug oder der betreffende TMG gehört derselben Kategorie und Klasse an wie das Luftfahrzeug nach Teil-FCL, auf dem die anzurechnenden Flugstunden absolviert wurden;“

muss es heißen:

| „i) | das betreffende Flugzeug oder der betreffende TMG gehört derselben Kategorie und Klasse an wie das Luftfahrzeug nach Teil-FCL, für das die geflogenen Flugstunden angerechnet werden sollen;“. |
| --- | --- |

„i)

das betreffende Flugzeug oder der betreffende TMG gehört derselben Kategorie und Klasse an wie das Luftfahrzeug nach Teil-FCL, für das die geflogenen Flugstunden angerechnet werden sollen;“.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1990 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1990

 To prohibit the Secretary of the Treasury from enforcing the Patient 
 Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education 
                      Reconciliation Act of 2010.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 15, 2013

Mr. Price of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the Secretary of the Treasury from enforcing the Patient 
 Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education 
                      Reconciliation Act of 2010.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Keep the IRS Off Your Health Care 
Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds the following:
            (1) On May 10, 2013, the Internal Revenue Service admitted 
        that it singled out advocacy groups, based on ideology, seeking 
        tax-exempt status.
            (2) This action raises pertinent questions about the 
        agency's ability to implement and oversee Public Law 111-48 and 
        Public Law 111-52.
            (3) This action could be an indication of future Internal 
        Revenue Service abuses in relation to Public Law 111-48 and 
        Public Law 111-52 given that it is their responsibility to 
        enforce a key provision, the individual mandate.
            (4) Americans accept the principle that patients, families, 
        and doctors should be making medical decisions, not the Federal 
        Government.

SEC. 3. PROHIBITING ENFORCEMENT OF PPACA AND HCERA.

    The Secretary of the Treasury, or any delegate of the Secretary, 
shall not implement or enforce any provisions of or amendments made by 
Public Law 111-148 or 111-152.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [LLMTB07900 09 L10100000.PH0000 LXAMANMS0000]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of Public Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act and the Federal  Advisory Committee Act of 1972, the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management  (BLM) Western Montana Resource Advisory Council (RAC) will meet as indicated below.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held December 9, 2010, beginning at 9 a.m. with a 30-minute public comment period and will adjourn at 3 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be in the Bureau of Land Management Butte Field Office (106 North Parkmont) in Butte, Montana.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    This 15-member council advises the Secretary of the  Interior on a variety of management issues associated with public land management in Montana.  During these meetings the council will participate in/discuss/act upon several topics, including: new RAC member orientation; information on the Landscape Conservation Cooperative program; Field Office updates; discussion of oil and gas leasing reform; and administrative details.                          ( print page 71142)    

All RAC meetings are open to the public. The public may present written comments to the RAC.  Each formal RAC meeting will also have time allocated for hearing public comments. Depending on  the number of persons wishing to comment and time available, the time for individual oral comments may be limited.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

David Abrams, Western Montana Resource Advisory Council Coordinator, Butte Field Office, 106 North Parkmont, Butte, Montana 59701, telephone 406-533-7617.

Richard M. Hotaling,

District Manager, Western Montana District.

[FR Doc. 2010-29328 Filed 11-19-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-DN-P
Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

FTN FINANCIAL CAPITAL MARKETS,

a division of First Tennessee Bank,

National Association,

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant,

vs. 4:03-CV-249-SPM

MAGNOLIA CAPITAL ADVISORS,

INC., et al.,

Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff,

_____________________________/

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT RECORD

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the “Plaintiff’s Motion to

Supplement Record and Supporting Memorandum” (doc. 227) filed July 8, 2005. 

This Court entered an order enforcing the settlement agreement between the

parties (doc. 218) on May 4, 2005. Plaintiff simultaneously appealed that

decision (doc. 211) and submitted a motion for reconsideration (doc. 206). After

Defendants filed their response (doc. 220), the Court entered an order denying

the motion for reconsideration, noting that because the motion was filed more

than ten days after the order was entered, it was to be treated as a motion under

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). 

Case 4:03-cv-00249-SPM-AK Document 233 Filed 07/14/05 Page 1 of 3
Page 2 of 3

1

 As to Plaintiff’s statement that “the Court . . . entered an order . . . without allowing

[Plaintiff] the opportunity to submit a reply memorandum,” the Court directs Plaintiff’s attention to

Local Rule 7.1(C), which states that “[n]o reply memoranda shall be filed absent a showing of

good cause and upon leave of the court.” Plaintiff did not file a motion requesting such leave.

Plaintiff now files this motion to supplement the record, claiming that the

order enforcing the settlement agreement was not a final order, and thus the

Court should have evaluated its motion under the more lenient standard of Rule

54(b). Plaintiff attached “newly-discovered evidence” to the motion in an attempt

to sway the Court’s decision.1

A final judgment under Rule 60(b) is “any judgment that is an appealable

order.” Solaroll Shade and Shutter Corp., Inc. v. Bio-Energy Sys., Inc., 803 F.2d

1130, 1131 (11th Cir. 1986)(citing Mullins v. Nickel Plate Mining Co., 691 F.2d

971, 974 (11th Cir. 1982)). In Solaroll, the court stated that “[t]here is no

question that the order . . . enforcing the settlement agreement satisfies that

definition.” Id. The motion for reconsideration was properly denied under Rule

60(b), and it is now the province of the appellate court to review the denial.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the motion to supplement the record

(doc. 227) is hereby denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this fourteenth day of July, 2005.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

/pao

Case 4:03-cv-00249-SPM-AK Document 233 Filed 07/14/05 Page 2 of 3
Page 3 of 3

Case 4:03-cv-00249-SPM-AK Document 233 Filed 07/14/05 Page 3 of 3
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ANTONIO R. RICHARDSON,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:19cv494–WS/MAF

SGT. E. PERRY and

SGT. K. WASHINGTON,

Defendants.

 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF

No. 37) docketed December 8, 2020. The magistrate judge recommends that the

plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed for failure to state a claim. 

On December 23, 2020, the plaintiff’s copy of the report and

recommendation was returned to the clerk's office by the post office. The envelope

was stamped: “RTS Released.” See ECF No. 38. Indeed, the Florida Department of

Corrections’s website indicates that the plaintiff was released on December 1,

2020. Although it is his responsibility to do so, the plaintiff has not provided the

court with a current address. 

Case 4:19-cv-00494-WS-MAF Document 39 Filed 01/13/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Upon review of the record, this court has determined that the

recommendation of dismissal should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order of the court. 

2. The defendants’ motion (ECF No. 34) for summary judgment is

GRANTED.

3. The plaintiff’s complaint and this action are DISMISSED for failure to

state a claim. 

4. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: “All claims against Sgt. E. Perry

and Sgt. K. Washington are dismissed for failure to state a claim.”

DONE AND ORDERED this 13th day of January , 2021.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

Case 4:19-cv-00494-WS-MAF Document 39 Filed 01/13/21 Page 2 of 2