alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.3

                                                                  EDWARD D. FORD
                                                            6505 St. Andrews Way
                                                            Whistler B.C. V0N1B6

                                 April 16, 2005

International Gemini Technology Inc.
#208 - 828 Harbourside Drive
North Vancouver, B.C. V7P 3R9

ATTENTION: MARTIN SCHULTZ, SECRETARY

Dear Sirs:

RE: OUTBACK CAPITAL INC. ("OCI")

Further to our recent  discussions  and in  consideration  of your  Subscription
Agreement  dated  April 15,  2005 with OCI,  this letter is meant to confirm the
following:

     1.   I own 3,000,000 unencumbered common shares of OCI (the "Shares");

     2.   I hereby grant to you the option to acquire the Shares in exchange for
          1,000,000 common shares of International  Gemini  Technology Inc. (the
          "Option");

     3.   The Option is  exercisable by you any time prior to 5:00 pm (Vancouver
          Time) March 31,  2006  provided  that you have first  fully  performed
          under the Subscription Agreement.

I trust this clearly  outlines our mutual  agreement,  and ask that you indicate
same by  executing  the enclosed  copy of this letter and  returning it to me at
your earliest convenience. Thank you.

Sincerely,

"signed"

EDWARD D. FORD



Acknowledged and agreed, this 16th day of April 2005

INTERNATIONAL GEMINI TECHNOLOGY INC.


Per "signed"

Martin Schultz, Secretary
#### § 29.3505 Brown colors.

A group of colors ranging from a light brown to a dark brown. These colors vary from medium to low saturation and from medium to very low brillance. As used in these standards, the colors are expressed as light brown (L), medium brown (F), reddish brown (R), and dark brown (D).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

MARLO WASHINGTON,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 4:20cv228-MW/MAF

CHRISTOPHER EDELEN,

et al.,

Defendants.

______________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge’s Report 

and Recommendation, ECF No. 17. Upon consideration, no objections1 having been 

filed by the parties,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted, as this Court’s 

opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “This action is DISMISSED for 

failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a court order.” The Clerk shall close 

1 Simultaneous with this Order, this Court is granting a fifth extension of time for a different 

pro se party to file objections in a different case. This Court is mindful of COVID-19 and the 

limitations the pandemic has placed on parties. Accordingly, parties may file one-page requests 

for extension for good cause—indeed, this Court receives and grants such requests daily. But 

Plaintiff did not request an extension to file objections here.

Case 4:20-cv-00228-MW-MAF Document 18 Filed 12/09/20 Page 1 of 2
2

the file. 

SO ORDERED on December 9, 2020.

s/Mark E. Walker 

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00228-MW-MAF Document 18 Filed 12/09/20 Page 2 of 2
N OTE : This o rder is non precedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals** 
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

R. WAYNE JOHNSON, Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant

- Appellee.

______________________

2014

- 5102

______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal

Claims in No. 1:14

- cv

- 00294

- NBF, Senior Judge Eric G. Bruggink.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R

R. Wayne Johnson moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The United States moves for a 21

- day extension of time, until August 21, 2014, the file its response brief.

Johnson is incarcerated. Pursuant to the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act of 1995, this court may not autho rize the prosecution of an appeal by a prisoner without the prepayment of fees. 28 U.S.C. § 1915. A prisoner is no Case: 14-5102 Document: 9 Page: 1 Filed: 08/26/2014JOHNSON v. US 2

longer afforded the alternative of proce eding without payment of filing fees, but must, in time, pay the $50 5 filing fee in its entirety. * When funds exist, an initial partial payment must be made consisting of 20% of the greater of (a) the average monthly deposits to the priso ner’s account or (b) the average monthly balance in the prisoner’s account for the six

- month period immediately preceding the filing of the notice of appeal. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Thereafter, the prisoner is required to make monthly payments of 20% of the preceding mon th’s i ncome credited to the prisoner’s account. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The agency with custody of the prisoner must forward payments from the prisoner’s account each time the amount in the account exceeds $10 until the $50 5 filing fee is paid in full. Id.

By separate letter, the custodian of Johnson’s prison account is being directed to make the necessary arrang ements to forward the filing fee to the court.

Accordingly,

It Is Ordered That:

(1) The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis

is de nied.

(2) The motion for an extension of time is granted.

* The court notes that Mr. Johnson signed an earlier
version of Federal Circuit Form 6A, authorizing payment of this court’s filing fee from his account. On December 1, 2013, the court increased its filing fee. Thus, Mr. Joh nson’s account will be charged t he current fee of $50 5. Case: 14-5102 Document: 9 Page: 2 Filed: 08/26/2014JOHNSON v. US 3

F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

Daniel E. O’Toole

Clerk of Court

s24 Case: 14-5102 Document: 9 Page: 3 Filed: 08/26/2014
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Mark Tripp, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Easton-Bell Sports,Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent function): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.     Date: August 15, 2006 /s/ Mark Tripp         Mark Tripp    Chief Financial Officer    (Principal Financial Officer)
98-1710.

#### State v. Childs.

Hamilton App. No. C-961134. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.
| **Back to Books**
**Go to Contents****The Gathering Biological Warfare Storm**Colonel (Dr.) Jim A. DavisDr. Barry R. SchneiderEditors
April 2002(2nd Edition)**USAF Counterproliferation Center**Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### § 2903.15 General.

Within the limit of funds available for such purpose, the Authorized Departmental Officer (ADO) shall make grants to those responsible, eligible applicants whose applications are judged most meritorious under the procedures set forth in this part. The date specified by the ADO as the effective date of the grant shall be no later than September 30 of the Federal fiscal year in which the project is approved for support and funds are appropriated for such purpose, unless otherwise permitted by law. It should be noted that the project need not be initiated on the grant effective date, but as soon thereafter as practical so that project goals may be attained within the funded project period. All funds granted by OEPNU under this program shall be expended solely for the purpose for which the funds are granted in accordance with the approved application and budget, the regulations of this part, the terms and conditions of the award, the applicable Federal cost principles, and the applicable Department assistance regulations (including part 3019 of this title).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

MATHEW SELOVER,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:20cv4698-TKW-HTC

ESCAMBIA COUNTY BOARD OF

COMMISSIONERS and RAYME

EDLER,

Defendants.

________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME

Upon due consideration of Defendant Escambia County Board of 

Commissioners’ unopposed motion for extension of time to respond to the amended 

complaint (Doc. 26), it is

ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED, and Defendant Escambia County 

Board of Commissioners shall have until May 15, 2020, to answer or otherwise 

respond to the amended complaint.

DONE and ORDERED this 6th day of May, 2020.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-04698-TKW-HTC Document 27 Filed 05/06/20 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 223 (Friday, November 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 70962]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29173]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Maritime Administration

[Docket Number 2010-0103]


California Green Trade Corridor Transportation Investment 
Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER)

AGENCY: Department of Transportation, Maritime Administration.

ACTION: Notice of availability of Finding of No Significant Impact.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Maritime Administration, of 
the Department of Transportation (DOT), has made available to 
interested parties the Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) for the 
California Green Trade Corridor Transportation Investment Generating 
Economic Recovery (TIGER) grant. An environmental assessment (EA) and 
FONSI have been prepared pursuant to the National Environmental Policy 
Act (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4231 et seq.) in accordance with the Council on 
Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations for implementing the procedural 
provisions of NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500-1508).
    The purpose of the EA is to evaluate the potential environmental 
impacts from two separate marine highway projects running from the 
Ports of West Sacramento and Stockton to the Port of Oakland. The 
marine highway services consist of a tug and barge configuration and 
are scheduled to operate once a week.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel E. Yuska Jr., 1200 New Jersey 
Ave., SE., Washington, DC 20590; phone: (202) 366-0714; or e-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2f6b4e41464a4301565a5c444e6f4b405b01484059"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="074366696e626b297e72746c664763687329606871">[email protected]</span></a>. Persons who use a telecommunications device for 
the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 
1-800-877-8339 to contact the above individual during business hours. 
The FIRS is available twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week, to 
leave a message or question with the above individual. You will receive 
a reply during normal business hours.
    A copy of the Final EA and Finding of No Significant Impact can be 
obtained or viewed online at http:[sol][sol]www.regulations.gov. The 
files are in a portable document format (pdf); in order to review or 
print the document, users need to obtain a free copy of Acrobat Reader. 
The Acrobat Reader can be obtained from http:[sol][sol]www.adobe.com/
prodindex/acrobat/readstep.html.

    By order of the Maritime Administrator.

    Dated: November 15, 2010.
Christine Gurland,
Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-29173 Filed 11-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-81-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

November 3, 2010

d1027

Order 

November 3, 2010

141257

MICHAEL SAMEL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 141257

COA: 296176

Court of Claims: 09-000772-AA

PAROLE BOARD,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 24, 2010 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

DAVIS, J., not participating. I recuse myself and am not participating because I 

was on the Court of Appeals panel in this case. See MCR 2.003(B).
§ 28.176 Designation of official certificates, memoranda, marks, other identifications, and devices for purpose of the Agricultural Marketing Act. Subsection 203(h) of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946, as amended by Public Law 272, 84th Congress, provides criminal penalties for various specified offenses relating to official certificates, memoranda, marks or other identifications, and devices for making such marks or identifications, issued or authorized under section 203 of said Act and certain misrepresentations concerning the inspection or grading of agricultural products under said section. For the purposes of said subsection and the provisions in this subpart, the terms listed below shall have the respective meanings specified: ( a ) *Official certificate* means any form of certification, either written, printed or electronic, used under this subpart to certify with respect to the fiber quality and conditions of samples submitted (including the compliance of submitted samples with applicable specifications).
( b ) *Official memorandum* means any initial record of findings made by an authorized person in the process of grading and classing, pursuant to this subpart, any processing or plant-operation report made by an authorized person in connection with grading and classing under this subpart, and any report made by an authorized person of services performed pursuant to this subpart.
( c ) *Official mark* , for the purposes of this subpart, means the grade mark, inspection mark, and any other mark associated only with the samples submitted to the Department for classification.
( d ) *Official identification* means any United States (U.S.) standard designation of class, grade, quality, or condition specified in this subpart or any symbol, stamp, label, or seal indicating that the submitted sample has been officially graded and/or indicating the class, grade, quality, or condition of the submitted sample.
( e ) *Official device* means a stamping appliance branding device, stencil, printed label or any other mechanically or manually operated tool that is approved by the Administrator for the purpose of applying any official mark or other identification to any product or the packaging material thereof.
[22 FR 10930, Dec. 28, 1957, as amended at 81 FR 7030, Feb. 10, 2016]
<PAGE>

                                                              EXHIBIT 23.1


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting part of Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration
Statement on Form S-3 (No. 33-59360) and in the Registration Statements on Form
S-8 (Nos. 33-37408, 33-53122 and 33-64678) of L.A. Gear, Inc. of our report
dated February 21, 1997 appearing in the Annual Report to Shareholders which is
incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  We also consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report on the Financial Statement Schedule,
which appears on page 16 of this Form 10-K.




Price Waterhouse LLP
Los Angeles, California
February 21, 1997
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 71456]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29434]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-74,549]


Algonac Cast Products, Inc., Algonac, MI; Notice of Affirmative 
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration

    By application dated October 25, 2010, a worker requested 
administrative reconsideration of the negative determination regarding 
workers' eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) 
applicable to workers and former workers of Algonac Cast Products, 
Inc., Algonac, Michigan (subject firm). The determination was issued on 
September 24, 2010. The Department's Notice of Determination was 
published in the Federal Register on October 8, 2010 (75 FR 62427). The 
workers are engaged in activities related to the production of marine 
hardware (i.e. rudders, struts, stuffing boxes, rudder arm, rudder 
support, rudder clevis, etc.) and are not separately identifiable by 
article produced.
    The negative determination was based on the Department's findings 
that the subject firm did not import or shift their production of 
marine hardware to a foreign country during the relevant period; that 
the customers did not increase their reliance on imported marine 
hardware while concurrently decreasing their purchases from the subject 
firm; that worker separations or threats of separation were not related 
to an increase in imports of marine hardware; and that the workers did 
not produce an article that was incorporated in the production of an 
article by a firm whose workers were certified eligible to apply for 
TAA.
    The request for reconsideration alleged that a lost bid with Sea 
Ray Boats Corporation contributed importantly to worker separations at 
the subject firm.
    The Department has carefully reviewed the request for 
reconsideration and the existing record, and has determined that the 
Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the 
petitioning workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act 
of 1974, as amended.

Conclusion

    After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim 
is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. 
Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, 
granted.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 10th day of November, 2010.
Del Min Amy Chen,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2010-29434 Filed 11-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### § 29.2286 Oil.

A soft, semifluid constituent of tobacco. (See chart, § 29.2351.)
Third District.

#### Clifford Henry, appellant, v. Frank Morris, appellee.

Gen. No. 8,817.

Opinion filed October 10, 1934.

Harvey Gross, for appellant. O’Hair & McClain, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Allaben

delivered the opinion of the court.
§ 3201.89 Animal cleaning products. ( a ) *Definition.* Products designed to clean, condition, or remove substances from animal hair or other parts of an animal.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The Federal preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 57 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than November 19, 2013, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased animal cleaning products. By that date, Federal agencies that have the responsibility for drafting or reviewing specifications for products to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased animal cleaning products.
[77 FR 69386, Nov. 19, 2012]