alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-41325 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus EZEQUIEL ZAPATA-REYES, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-00-CR-315-1

-------------------- August 21, 2001 Before KING, Chief Judge, and POLITZ and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Ezequiel Zapata-Reyes (“Zapata”) appeals the 41-month sentence imposed following his plea of guilty to a charge of being found in the United States after deportation, a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. For the first time on appeal, he contends that the felony conviction that resulted in his increased sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) was an element of the offense that should have been charged in the indictment. Zapata acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States ,No. 00-41325 -2- 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres

. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001). Zapata has failed to demonstrate error, plain or otherwise. Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 983-84. The judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Molino E. Pastificio DiPonte San Giovanni S.P.A., Respondent, and Andre & Cie, S. A., Appellant.

— Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County, entered April 11, 1979, awarding petitioner $13,330.46, as damages for contempt, is unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, with costs to respondent-appellant Andre & Cie, S. A., and the motion of said petitioner to punish said respondent-appellant for contempt is denied. "As punishment for contempt involves, or may involve, not only loss of property but liberty, *562it is a reasonable requirement that the mandate alleged to be violated should be clearly expressed, and when applied to the act complained of it should appear, with reasonable certainty, that it had been violated.” *(Ketchum v Edwards,*153 NY 534, 539; accord *Matter of Benson Realty Corp. v Walsh,*54 AD2d 881.) "In"most cases the court will construe the judgment or order strictly and resolve any ambiguities in favor of the contemnor.” (5 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, par 5104.15, pp 51-56; see, also, *Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis v Pioneer Warehouse Corp.,*61 AD2d 756.) In the present case it does not clearly appear that the conduct of respondent-appellant complained of was a violation of the court’s mandate, fairly read. Concur — Bloom, J. P., Markewich, Silverman and Ross, JJ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENSACOLA DIVISION 

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCTS

 Case No. 3:19md2885 

LIABILITY LITIGATION 

This Document Relates to: 

Vilsmeyer, 7:20cv113 

 

Judge M. Casey Rodgers 

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones 

DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS ORDER NO. 3 

This Order addresses Defendants’ objections and counter-designations to 

Plaintiff’s affirmative deposition designations and Plaintiff’s objections to 

Defendants’ counter-designations thereto for the following witness depositions: 

1. Skarda Craft, Jami (11/23/2021) 

2. Vandersluis, Michele (11/17/2021) 

3. Vilsmeyer, Christina (11/19/2021) 

SO ORDERED this 6th day of March, 2022. 

 M. CASEY RODGERS 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 7:20-cv-00113-MCR-GRJ Document 105 Filed 03/06/22 Page 1 of 1
On November 18, 2011, the California Air Resources Board submitted revisions to the California State

Implementation Plan. We have reviewed materials submitted with the following rules and found that they fulfill the completeness criteria in 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 51, Appendix V.

APCD/AQMD Rule # Rule Title

Placer County APCD 502 New Source Review

San Joaquin Valley 4566 Organic Material Composting Operations APCD

San Joaquin Valley 4694 Wine Fermentation and Storage Tanks APCD

South Coast AQMD 1133.1 Chipping and Grinding Activities South Coast AQMD 1133.3 Emission Reductions from Greenwaste

Composting Operations

This addresses all revisions in this submittal. In the coming months we will review the complete revisions for action pursuant to Clean Air Act section 110(k).Questions regarding our completeness review should be directed to Cynthia G. Allen at (415) 947-4120.

cc: Mr. Tom Christofk, APCO

Placer County APCDMr. Seyed Sadredin, APCOSan Joaquin Valley Unified APCD

Sincerely,

Mr. Robert D. Fletcher

Deputy Executive Officer

California Air Resources Board

Post Office Box 2815

Sacramento, California 95812

Dear Mr. Fletcher:

Air Division

Pnnted ‘ii I?e(’,nled 1’ai’r
# L_2020434EN.01005001.xml

| 23.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 434/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 434/50

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2020/2197

of 21 December 2020

amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 concerning certain specific restrictions on economic and financial relations with Iraq

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 of 7 July 2003 concerning certain specific restrictions on economic and financial relations with Iraq and repealing Regulation (EC) No 2465/96 (1), and in particular Article 11(b) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 lists public bodies, corporations and agencies and natural and legal persons, bodies and entities of the previous government of Iraq covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources that were located outside Iraq on 22 May 2003 under that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 lists public bodies, corporations and agencies and natural and legal persons, bodies and entities of the previous government of Iraq covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources that were located outside Iraq on 22 May 2003 under that Regulation.

| (2) | On 16 December 2020, the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council decided to remove one entity from the list of persons and entities to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 16 December 2020, the Sanctions Committee of the United Nations Security Council decided to remove one entity from the list of persons and entities to whom the freezing of funds and economic resources should apply.

| (3) | Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 is amended as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 December 2020.

For the Commission,

On behalf of The President,

Director-General

Directorate-General for Financial Stability, Financial Services and Capital Markets Union

---

(1)  
  OJ L 169, 8.7.2003, p. 6.

1

---

ANNEX

In Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1210/2003 the following entity is deleted:

| ‘4. | Rafidain Bank (alias Al-Rafidain Bank), Rashid Street, Baghdad, Iraq. Other information: offices in Iraq, United Kingdom, Jordan, United Arab Emirates, Yemen, Sudan and Egypt.’ |
| --- | --- |

‘4.

Rafidain Bank (alias Al-Rafidain Bank), Rashid Street, Baghdad, Iraq. Other information: offices in Iraq, United Kingdom, Jordan, United Arab Emirates, Yemen, Sudan and Egypt.’

---
Page 1 of 2

Case No. 4:20cv178-RH-MAF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

LARRY ALONZO HILL BEY,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 4:20cv178-RH-MAF

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and 

recommendation, ECF No. 7, and the objections, ECF No. 8. I have reviewed de 

novo the issues raised by the objections.

The plaintiff’s rambling objections are difficult to understand. Most have 

nothing to do with this case or with the recommendation for dismissal. The 

plaintiff seems to challenge a child-custody award by a state court. But he alleges 

no facts that show or even suggest the award violated federal law in any respect. 

More fundamentally, under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, federal district courts

cannot hear “cases brought by state-court losers complaining of injuries caused by 

Case 4:20-cv-00178-RH-MAF Document 9 Filed 06/02/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 4:20cv178-RH-MAF

state-court judgments rendered before the district court proceedings commenced 

and inviting district court review and rejection of those judgments.” Exxon Mobil 

Corp. v. Saudi Basic Indus. Corp., 544 U.S. 280, 284 (2005). See also Rooker v. 

Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413 (1923); D.C. Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 

U.S. 462 (1983).

For these reasons and those set out in the report and recommendation,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as the court’s 

further opinion. The clerk must enter judgment stating, “This case is dismissed for 

failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted.” The clerk must close the 

file.

SO ORDERED on June 2, 2020.

s/Robert L. Hinkle

United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00178-RH-MAF Document 9 Filed 06/02/20 Page 2 of 2
Case 4:02-cv-00363-SPM Document 53 Filed 06/27/03 Page 1 of 3
Case 4:02-cv-00363-SPM Document 53 Filed 06/27/03 Page 2 of 3
Case 4:02-cv-00363-SPM Document 53 Filed 06/27/03 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C SECTION 350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Brooke Credit Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael S. Lowry, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 14, 2007



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Michael S. Lowry   
|Michael S. Lowry       
|Chief Executive Officer
#### § 29.3521 Grademark.

A grademark normally consists of three symbols which indicate group, quality, and color. A letter is used to indicate group, a number to indicate quality, and a letter or letters to indicate color. For example, B3D means Heavy Leaf, third quality, and dark-brown color.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2219 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2219

To reauthorize the Integrated Coastal and Ocean Observation System Act 
                                of 2009.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 3, 2013

 Mr. Young of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred 
to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee 
  on Science, Space, and Technology, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To reauthorize the Integrated Coastal and Ocean Observation System Act 
                                of 2009.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF INTEGRATED COASTAL AND OCEAN OBSERVATION 
              SYSTEM ACT OF 2009.

    The Integrated Coastal and Ocean Observation System Act of 2009 is 
amended by striking ``are authorized to be appropriated to the 
Secretary of Commerce for fiscal years 2009 through 2013 such sums as 
are necessary'' and inserting ``is authorized to be appropriated to the 
Secretary of Commerce for each of fiscal years 2014 through 2018 
$29,600,000''.
                                 <all>
```
Title: Water-quality data collected at Lake Anne, Reston, Virginia, 1997-1999

Author(s): Conko, K.M., Kennedy, M.M., and Rice, K.C.

Publishing Organization: U.S. Geological Survey

Publication Series and Number: Open-File Report OF-2000-481

Publication Date: 2000

Map Scale: 1:14,000

Cross Section: None

Northernmost Latitude: 39°58' 1"N (39.9670)

Southernmost Latitude: 39°57'47"N (39.9630)

Easternmost Longitude: 77°19'44"W (-77.3290)

Westernmost Longitude: 77°20'31"W (-77.3420)

Publication Format: Digital and Paper

Online:

 View the publication from the USGS Publications Warehouse

This Product Is Available, Please note the

publication series and number, and then

contact: U.S. Geological Survey

Postal Address:

USGS Information Services

Box 25286

Denver, CO 80225

Voice Telephone: (303) 202-4700 or 1-888-ASK-USGS

Facsimile Telephone: (303) 202-4693

If any fields in this record

contain errors, please send us

your

Has this record

been

U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA, USA

URL http://ngmdb.usgs.gov/ngmdb/ngm_catalog.ora.html

Database project personnel.

Last modified: 7-Nov-2011

Product Description Page http://ngmdb.usgs.gov/Prodesc/proddesc_34805.htm

1 of 1 11/8/2011 9:38 AM
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

TAJHON WILSON,

FDOC Inmate No. R21310,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:20cv5260/LAC/EMT

C. BEARDON,

Defendant.

__________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge’s

Report and Recommendation dated May 8, 2020 (ECF No. 6). Plaintiff has been

furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and afforded an opportunity

to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No

objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined it

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted

and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Plaintiff’s “Motion to Voluntary Dismiss Without Prejudice” (ECF No.

5) is DENIED.

Case 3:20-cv-05260-LC-EMT Document 7 Filed 06/11/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

3. This case is DISMISSED for the reasons set forth in the Report and

Recommendation (ECF No. 4).

4. The Clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 11th day of June, 2020.

 s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No. 3:20cv5260/LAC/EMT

Case 3:20-cv-05260-LC-EMT Document 7 Filed 06/11/20 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
Form S-3 (File No. 333-44743) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-30381, 33-30382, 33-
35363, 33-41312, 33-63346, 33-63512, 33-79458, 333-09885 and 333-14347) of our
reports dated December 6, 1995, on our audit of the consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows and the financial statement
schedule of Consilium, Inc. and subsidiaries as of October 31, 1995 and for the
year then ended, which reports are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


                                            COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.



San Jose, California
January 28, 1998
98-1852.

#### State v. Nivens.

Franklin App. No. 95APA09-1236. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
§ 2901.6 Exceptions and exemptions. ( a ) *Request for exception or exemption.* ( 1 ) Any person seeking an exception or exemption from the Essential Agricultural Uses and Requirements regulations in part 2900 shall file a formal written request with the Director. The request shall contain a full and complete statement of all relevant facts pertaining to the circumstance, act, or transaction that is the subject of the request and to the action sought. The request should state the special hardship, inequity or unfair distribution of burdens that will be prevented by making the exception or exemption. The Director shall publish a notice in the Federal Register advising the public that a request for an exception or exemption has been received and that written comments will be accepted with respect thereto if received within 20 days of the notice. The Federal Register notice will provide that copies of the request from which confidential information has been deleted in accordance with paragraph (a)(2) of this section may be obtained from the petitioner. The Petitioner shall be afforded an opportunity to respond to such submissions.
( 2 ) If the petitioner wishes to claim confidential treatment for any information contained in the request or other documents submitted under this part 2901, such person shall file together with the document a second copy of the document from which has been deleted the information for which such person wishes to claim confidential treatment. The petitioner shall indicate in the original document that it is confidential or contains confidential information and may file a statement specifying the justification for non-disclosure of the information for which non-disclosure is sought. The Director shall consider such requests, and subject to the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552 and other applicable laws and regulations, shall treat such information as confidential.
( b ) *Decision and order.* Upon consideration of the request for an exception or exemption and other relevant information received or obtained during the proceedings, the Director shall issue an order granting or denying the request. The Director shall publish a notice in the Federal Register of the issuance of a decision and order on the request. The granting of a request for an exception or exemption shall be considered final agency action for purposes of judicial review under § 2901.8.
( c ) *Denial of an exception or exemption.* A request for an exception or exemption shall be considered denied for purposes of review of such denial under § 2901.7 only if: ( 1 ) The Director has notified the petitioner in writing that the request is denied under paragraph (b) of this section; or
( 2 ) The Director does not respond to a request for an exception or exemption by ( i ) granting the request for an exception or exemption under paragraph (b) of this section or
( ii ) giving notice of when a decision will be made within 45 days of the receipt of the request, or with such extended time as the Director may prescribe by written notice within the 45-day period.
#### § 29.2393 Rule 2.

The determination of a grade shall be based upon a thorough examination of a lot of tobacco or of an official sample of the lot.
### Final Report

Testing of Three Steroids from the Drug Enforcement Administration for

Anabolic and Androgenic Activity In Vitro and In Vivo

June 2009C ontributors

The following persons participated in the conduct of the study

N ames of study personnel have been removed for privacy

- 3

-SIGNATURE PAGE for

Testing of Three Steroids from the Drug Enforcement Administration of Anabolic and

Androgenic Activity In Vitro and In Vivo

Conducted by

BIOQUAL, Inc.

9600 Medical Center Drive

Rockville, MD 20850

- 3336

Names and Signatures removed for privacy

- 4

-
#### § 322.11 Ports of entry.

Shipments of honeybees, honeybee germ plasm, and bees other than honeybees imported under this subpart may enter the United States only at a port of entry staffed by an APHIS inspector.[2]

###### Footnotes -
  322.11

[2] To find out if a specific port is staffed by an APHIS inspector, or for a list of ports staffed by APHIS inspectors, contact Permit Unit, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 133, Riverdale, MD 20737-1236; toll-free (877) 770-5990; fax (301) 734-8700.
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Arrow Resources Development,
Inc. (the Company ) for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report ), I, Peter J.
Frugone, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
subject to the disclosure of deficiencies in the Company ’ s disclosure controls
and procedures set forth in Item 8A  of the Report:





(1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





April 15,
2010




/s/ Peter
      J. FrugonePeter
      J. FrugoneChief
      Executive Officer
Exhibit 10(J)



 






Exhibit 10( j )




Regent Communications, Inc.

Schedule of Director Compensation




     Each non-management director of Regent Communications, Inc. currently receives an annual cash
retainer of $12,000, paid $1,000 per month for his service as director, as well as reimbursement
for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by him in connection with his duties as a director,
including attending meetings of the Board and any committees thereof. The chair of the Audit
Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receives an
additional annual cash retainer of $5,000, $2,500 and $2,500, respectively, for the additional
services required of the Committee chair. Directors that serve on a committee receive $1,000 for
each committee meeting that they attend, either in person or via telephone. Directors who are
employees of the Company receive no additional fees for serving as a director.



     In accordance with the Regent Communications, Inc. 2001 Directors’ Stock Option Plan, each
non-management director receives 5,000 stock options annually for his service as a director.
Newly elected directors receive a grant of 10,000 stock options at the first board meeting
following his election, per the provisions of the plan.