alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO.: 4:03cr28-SPM

CLARENCE F. HOOKS,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

This cause comes before the Court upon the Motion for Issuance of a Writ

of Mandamus Pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 1361 filed by Clarence F. Hooks. 

Doc. 42. Hooks asks that the Court compel the Government to evaluate his

assistance to the Government for purposes of filing a substantial assistance

motion.

Hooks believes that he has provided substantial assistance and contends

that the Government’s failure to file a substantial assistance motion on his behalf

shows that Government failed to evaluate his assistance. The Government,

however, retained discretion not to file a substantial assistance motion, so the

lack of a motion does not necessarily mean that the Government failed to

evaluate Hooks’ assistance. As explained in a previous order (doc. 41), a

defendant’s claim that he provided substantial assistance is not sufficient to

Case 4:03-cr-00028-MW-CAS Document 43 Filed 10/07/08 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

CASE NO.: 4:03cr28-SPM

trigger review of a prosecutor’s refusal to file a substantial assistance motion. 

Wade v. United States, 504 U.S. 181, 186 (1992). 

“The party seeking mandamus has the burden of demonstrating that its 

right to issuance of the writ is clear and indisputable.” In re BellSouth Corp., 334

F.3d 941, 953 (11th Cir. 2003). The action sought to be compelled must be a

clear, nondiscretionary duty and the party must exhaust all other avenues of

relief. Cash v. Barnhart, 327 F.2d 1252, 1258 (11th Cir. 2003). In this case,

there is no basis to conclude that the Government failed to properly evaluate

Hooks’ assistance to the Government. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: the motion for issuance of writ of

mandamus (doc. 42) is denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 7th day of October, 2008.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 4:03-cr-00028-MW-CAS Document 43 Filed 10/07/08 Page 2 of 2
###### Editorial Note on Part 3404

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3404 appear at 76 FR 4808, Jan. 27, 2011.

#### § 3404.1 General statement.

This part is issued in accordance with the regulations of the Secretary of Agriculture in part 1, subpart A of this title and appendix A thereto, implementing the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552). The Secretary's regulations, as implemented by the regulations in this part, govern the availability of records of the National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) to the public.
#### § 29.6042 Sweated.

The condition of tobacco which has passed through one or more fermentations natural to tobacco packed with a normal percentage of moisture. This condition sometimes is described as aged.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

NYDEED B.K. NASHAD’DAI,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:03cv297-WS

LIEUTENANT J.A. PICKLES,

SERGEANT R.W. LONG,

SERGEANT PADGET,

SERGEANT PHILMAN,

SERGEANT BRYAN,

OFFICER D.H. BEVIS,

UNKNOWN MAJOR OF SECURITY,

UNKNOWN OFFICER #2,

UNKNOWN OFFICER #3,

Defendants.

 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 74)

docketed May 12, 2006. The magistrate judge recommends that the case be dismissed

for failure to prosecute.

Upon review of the record, this court has determined that the magistrate judge’s

report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order of the court.

Case 4:03-cv-00297-WS-CAS Document 75 Filed 06/20/06 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 4:03cv297-WS

2. This case is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute.

3. The clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

DONE AND ORDERED this June 20, 2006.

 /s William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:03-cv-00297-WS-CAS Document 75 Filed 06/20/06 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

LEWIS KEEFER,

Plaintiff,

vs.

3M COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.

 Case No. 7:20cv104-MCR-GRJ

FINAL JUDGMENT

This action came before the Court for a jury trial with the Honorable M. Casey 

Rodgers presiding. The issues have been tried, resulting in a jury verdict in 

Plaintiff’s favor on April 30, 2021. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that final judgment is 

entered in favor of the Plaintiff, LEWIS KEEFER, and against Defendants, 3M 

COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC, 

AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO LLC, and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES 

LLC, in the amount of $2,420,000, together with costs taxed against Defendants. 

JESSICA J. LYUBLANOVITS,

CLERK OF COURT

 May 2, 2021 /s/ 

DATE Deputy Clerk: Susan Simms

Case 7:20-cv-00104-MCR-GRJ Document 188 Filed 05/02/21 Page 1 of 1
2:15-cv-012751
USGS Publications Warehouse - Citation View Home

Publication Citation

Online Document Versions

View document

USGS Store

Currently unavailable through the USGS

Store.

Publication Type USGS Numbered Series

Title Description of piezometers installed in the middle Rio Grande basin

area, 1997-99, central New Mexico

Author Bartolino, J. R.; Rankin, D. R.

Year 2000

Series Open-File Report

Series Number 2000-477

Edition -

Language ENGLISH

Description 29 p.

USGS Library Call

Number -

Abstract:

Since 1993, the Santa Fe Group aquifer system in the Middle Rio Grande Basin, and particularly in

the Albuquerque area, has been the focus of studies to further define the extent of the most

productive parts of the aquifer and to gain a better understanding of how ground- water levels are

changing over time. The U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the New Mexico Office of the

State Engineer, installed nine piezometers during 1998-99 at five sites in and near the margin of the

Middle Rio Grande Basin in central New Mexico. In addition, the New Mexico Office of the State

Engineer installed another nine piezometers at three sites during 1997. These piezometers allow for

collection of ground-water-level data in areas for which little information is available. Most of the

piezometers were constructed of 2.5-inch-diameter flush-joint polyvinyl chloride (PVC) schedule 80

casing with 10-foot stainless steel screens; the shallow piezometer at the Tome site has a 40-foot

screen, and the single piezometers at the Dome Road and Phoenix Road sites have steel casing with

welded joints and a 10- and a 20-foot screen, respectively. Steel casing with a locking lid covers the

uppermost 2 feet of the piezometer casing. Drillers' logs and petrophysical logs were collected from

the deepest borehole at each site.

USGS Home

Contact USGS

Search USGS

Accessibility FOIA Privacy Policies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey

URL: http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/

USGS Publications Warehouse http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/ofr00477

1 of 2 11/8/2011 8:27 AM
Page Contact Information: Contact the Pubs Warehouse Team

Page Last modified: 11/08/2011 08:26:47

USGS Publications Warehouse http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/ofr00477

2 of 2 11/8/2011 8:27 AM
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to SEC Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)

I, William Enright, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Altimmune, Inc.; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                                                                           
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | 
|Dated: October 18, 2017 |  |  |  | /s/ William Enright                                                       
|                        |  |  |  | Name: William Enright                                                     
|                        |  |  |  | Title: President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)
Exhibit 31.1



Certification of Principal Executive
Officer

Pursuant to SEC Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)



I, John M. Gill, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of PharmAthene, Inc.; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated:  November 22, 2016 | /s/ John M. Gill                            
|------------------------- | --------------------------------------------
|                          | Name: John M. Gill                          
|                          | Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
#### § 25.502 Nominations by State-chartered economic development corporations.

Any rural area nominated by an economic development corporation chartered by a State and qualified to do business in the State in which it is located shall be treated as nominated by a State and local government.
149 So.2d 763

#### The ALLIANCE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Inc. v. Charles C. FOTI, d/b/a National Sales Agency.

No. 46522.

Feb. 8, 1963.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, we find no error in the judgment complained of.
**Exhibit
      31.1**


CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER




I,
      John
      M. Kelly, certify that:




1.  I
      have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Man-AHL 130, LLC (the
“Man-AHL 130”);




2.  Based
      on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of
      a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
      made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
      not
      misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
      report;




3.  Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Man-AHL 130 as
      of,
      and for, the periods presented in this annual report;




4.
      Man-AHL 130's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
      and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
      Act
      Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for Man-AHL 130 and have:




(a)  designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
      and
      procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
      information relating to Man-AHL 130, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
      is
      made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
      in which this annual report is being prepared;




(b)  evaluated
      the effectiveness of Man-AHL 130's disclosure controls and procedures and
      presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
      the
      disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
      this
      report based on such evaluation; and




(c)  disclosed
      in this report any change in Man-AHL 130’s internal control over financial
      reporting that occurred during Man-AHL 130’s fourth fiscal quarter that has
      materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Man-AHL
      130’s
      internal control over financial reporting.




5.  Man-AHL
      130’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
      evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Man-AHL 130's
      auditors and the audit committee of Man-AHL 130's board of directors (or persons
      performing the equivalent functions):




(a)  all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect Man-AHL 130's ability to record, process, summarize and report
      financial information; and




(b)  any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in Man-AHL 130's internal control over financial
      reporting.




By:  /s/
      John M. Kelly




__________________________________


John
      M.
      Kelly


President


August
      14, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2149 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2149

  To provide for the issuance and sale of a semipostal by the United 
    States Postal Service to support effective programs targeted at 
        improving permanency outcomes for youth in foster care.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2013

  Mr. Conyers (for himself and Mr. Buchanan) introduced the following 
 bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government 
    Reform, and in addition to the Committees on Education and the 
     Workforce and Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for the issuance and sale of a semipostal by the United 
    States Postal Service to support effective programs targeted at 
        improving permanency outcomes for youth in foster care.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Families for Foster Youth Stamp Act 
of 2013''.

SEC. 2. FAMILIES FOR FOSTER YOUTH SEMIPOSTAL.

    (a) In General.--In order to increase funding for effective 
programs targeted at improving permanency outcomes for youth in foster 
care, the United States Postal Service shall, for a period of not less 
than 4 years, provide for the issuance and sale of a semipostal, in 
accordance with section 416 of title 39, United States Code.
    (b) Disposition of Amounts.--
            (1) Adoption opportunities program.--Fifty percent of any 
        amounts becoming available from the sale of the semipostal 
        under this Act shall be transferred to the Secretary of Health 
        and Human Services for programs and activities authorized under 
        section 203 of the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment and 
        Adoption Reform Act of 1978 (42 U.S.C. 5113) that specifically 
        target improvement in permanency outcomes for youth in foster 
        care through adoption, guardianship, or kinship care.
            (2) State court improvement program.--Fifty percent of any 
        amounts becoming available from the sale of the semipostal 
        under this Act shall be transferred to the Secretary of Health 
        and Human Services for programs and activities authorized under 
        section 438 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 629h).
    (c) Definition.--In this Act, the term ``semipostal'' has the 
meaning given that term in section 416 of title 39, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Anna Kirik, Respondent, v. Ford Motor Company, Respondent, and Special Disability Fund, Appellant. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Staley, Jr., J.

Appeal by the Special Disability Fund from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, which excused the late filing of the self-insured employer’s claim for reimbursement under subdivision 8 of section 15 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The decedent died at the employer’s plant on February 1, 1961 at the age of 64. The death certificate indicated that death was due to a coronary .thrombosis. A claim for death benefits was filed by the widow on January 30, 1963, approximately two years thereafter. The self-insured employer filed a notice of controversy on March 8, 1963 and, on July 10, 1963, it filed a claim for reimbursement from the Special Disability Fund under subdivision 8 of section 15 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law on the basis of a pre-existing coronary disease and angina pectoris dating from July 1959. The claim for reimbursement was filed beyond .the time limitation provided by statute, and the appellant contends that the Workmen’s Compensation Board has no authority to permit a late filing of a claim for reimbursement. Similar situations have been presented in several cases, and an extension of time has been uniformly denied by this court and the Court of Appeals. *(Matter of Lambright*v. *St. Luke’s Hosp.,*3 A D 2d 613, affd. 3 N Y 2d 832; *Matter of Domash*v. *Standard Coat, Apron & Linen Serv.,*11 A D 2d 575, affd. 9 N Y 2d 889; *Matter of Hengel*v. *Federici & Sons,*3 A D 2d 885, affd. 4 N Y 2d 176.) Decision reversed, with costs to the Special Disability Fund against respondent employer. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds and Aulisi, JJ., concur with Staley, Jr., J.
#### § 29.6009 Crude.

A subdegree of maturity. (See Rule 15.)
# L_2021057DE.01009701.xml

| 18.2.2021 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 57/97 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2021

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 57/97

---

Berichtigung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) 2020/1770 der Kommission vom 26. November 2020 über Typen und Arten von zum Anpflanzen bestimmten Pflanzen, für die die Anforderung der Angabe des Rückverfolgbarkeitscodes in Pflanzenpässen gemäß der Verordnung (EU) 2016/2031 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates und zur Aufhebung der Richtlinie 92/105/EWG der Kommission nicht gilt

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 398 vom 27. November 2020
  )

Seite 6, Titel der Verordnung:

Anstatt:

„DURCHFÜHRUNGSVERORDNUNG (EU) 2020/1770 DER KOMMISSION vom 26. November 2020 über Typen und Arten von zum Anpflanzen bestimmten Pflanzen, für die die Anforderung der Angabe des Rückverfolgbarkeitscodes in Pflanzenpässen gemäß der Verordnung (EU) 2016/2031 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates und zur Aufhebung der Richtlinie 92/105/EWG der Kommission nicht gilt“

muss es heißen:

„DURCHFÜHRUNGSVERORDNUNG (EU) 2020/1770 DER KOMMISSION vom 26. November 2020 über Typen und Arten von zum Anpflanzen bestimmten Pflanzen, die nicht von der Anforderung der Angabe des Rückverfolgbarkeitscodes in Pflanzenpässen gemäß der Verordnung (EU) 2016/2031 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates ausgenommen sind, und zur Aufhebung der Richtlinie 92/105/EWG der Kommission“.

Seite 8, Anhang Titel:

Anstatt:

„
  Typen und Arten von zum Anpflanzen bestimmten Pflanzen, für die die Anforderung der Angabe des Rückverfolgbarkeitscodes in Pflanzenpässen nicht gilt
  “

muss es heißen:

„
  Typen und Arten von zum Anpflanzen bestimmten Pflanzen, die nicht von der Anforderung der Angabe des Rückverfolgbarkeitscodes in Pflanzenpässen ausgenommen sind
  “.

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 20, 2015

s0317

Order 

Clerk

March 20, 2015

151054

SC: 151054

In re KELLER, Minors. COA: 321603

Kalamazoo CC Family Division:

2006-000213-NA

_______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 20, 2015 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Jeff D. Morris, certify that:  1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Alon USA Energy, Inc.;  2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;  4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and  5.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: May 12, 2006                                                       /s/ Jeff D. Morris   Jeff D. Morris   President and Chief Executive Officer