alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 3402

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3402 appear at 76 FR 4807, Jan. 27, 2011.

#### § 3402.18 Evaluation criteria.

Applications addressing a particular national need area at a particular Fellowship level (master's, doctoral or postdoctoral) will be evaluated in competition with other applications addressing the same national need area at the same level. Both USDA internal staff and the panelists will evaluate applications on the basis of the criteria published in the solicitation.
P.1 

OAR Box 1338 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

7) ll-E-18 

Docket Number: 

A-89-10 

Printed 6/17/2008 1:48:05 PM Sheet 7 of 105 
P.2 

A-89-10 

II-E-1 8 

CORPORATI O 

CONTACT REPORT ;' ' '' 

5

 ra [^9! ..• 

Date Wclf\ f /7ff i originator T^ W 

CONTACT BY: TELEPHONE W MEETING D Other 

NAME, TITLE & ORGANIZATION /^c b (£f/KCi^ Ar^ k %,/ ( cco U < ^ f„ , WWJADDRESS & TELEPHONE NUMBER 

^-^. n o t QW^bk^GA 

PURPOSE OR SUBJECT (Give project number if appropriate) 

C05-C 

SUMMARY 

V,**- ^ ***> ^ r**^>#- 4/^rrf pp-p, <^c 

^<UA ,^i^! ^ .^JL WJ^ ^ pit) -- f7Cf 17/ = #/ ^ 

r "4— ' J "/" / 

Distribution:
Exhibit 10.15



 Exhibit 10.15 
  
 MCI, Inc. 
 Board of Directors 
  
 Amendment to the MCI,
Inc. 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan 
  
 WHEREAS,
pursuant to Section 9.01 of the MCI, Inc. 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Plan”), the Board of Directors of MCI, Inc. has the power to amend the Plan; and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors desires to amend the Plan to clarify certain provisions of the Plan; 
  
 NOW THEREFORE BE IT, 
  
 RESOLVED, that the Plan is amended in accordance with the Exhibit A attached
hereto, effective as of September 10, 2004; and 
  
 FURTHER
RESOLVED, that the appropriate officers of the Company be, and each of them hereby is, authorized to execute any amendment, document, certificate or other instrument and to do all such acts and things as they or counsel for the Company may deem
necessary or advisable to carry out the purposes of the foregoing resolutions; and 
  
 FURTHER RESOLVED, that the appropriate officers of the Company be, and each of them hereby is, authorized to execute any amendments to (1) the Registration Statement on Form S-8 previously filed by the Company
registering shares on behalf the Plan; and (2) any Plan prospectus. 







 Exhibit A 
  
 THIRD AMENDMENT 
 TO THE 
 MCI, INC. 2003 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN 
  
 Pursuant to the power reserved to it in Section 9.01 of the MCI, Inc. 2003 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the
“Plan”), the Board of Directors of MCI, Inc. hereby amends the Plan as follows: 
  
 Section 4.06, “Source of Shares” is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 
  
 Shares offered under the Stock Purchase Plan may be authorized and newly issued Shares, authorized and previously issued Shares purchased in open market
transactions by a Broker pursuant to directions from the Committee and at the market price prevailing on the applicable exchange or treasury Shares. 
  
 * * * 
  
 This amendment is hereby adopted effective this      day of
                    , 2004. 
  

			
	MCI, INC.
		
	By:	 	  


	Title:	 	Executive Vice President –
	 	 	Human Resources
#### WHITAKER, Respondent, v. STAFFORD, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 8, 1906.)

Action by Harry P. Whitaker against Jenny K. Stafford. J. L. Romer, for appellant. F. Brundage, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Order filed.
#### Armanda Kammerer et al., appellees, v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 37,339.

Opinion filed November 27, 1934.

Rehearing denied December 10, 1934.

Hoyne, O’Connor & Rubinkam, for appellant. Smith & Haddad, for appellees; George J. Haddad, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Seanlaii

delivered the opinion of the court.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
 ACTION: Update listing of financial institutions in liquidation.
 SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (Corporation) has been appointed the sole receiver for the following financial institutions effective as of the Date Closed as indicated in the listing. This list (as updated from time to time in the 
                        **Federal Register**
                        ) may be relied upon as “of record” notice that the Corporation has been appointed receiver for purposes of the statement of policy published in the July 2, 1992 issue of the 
                        **Federal Register**
                         (57 FR 29491). For further information concerning the identification of any institutions which have been placed in liquidation, please visit the Corporation Web site at 
                        *http://www.fdic.gov/​bank/​individual/​failed/​banklist.html*
                         or contact the Manager of Receivership Oversight in the appropriate service center. Dated: November 15, 2010. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Pamela Johnson, Regulatory Editing Specialist.
 Institutions in Liquidation
[In alphabetical order]
FDIC Ref. No.
Bank name
City
State
Date closed10311
Copper Star Bank
Scottsdale
AZ
11/12/201010312
Darby Bank & Trust Co.
Vidalia
GA
11/12/201010313
Tifton Banking Company
Tifton
GA
11/12/2010


[FR Doc. 2010-29382 Filed 11-19-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6741-01-P
#### § 29.2686 Summary of standard grades.

| 6 Grades of Wrappers | | | |
| A1F | A3F | A2D | A3D |
| A2F | A1D | | |
| 19 Grades of Heavy Leaf | | | |
| B1F | B1D | B3M | B5VF |
| B2F | B2D | B4M | B3G |
| B3F | B3D | B5M | B4G |
| B4F | B4D | B3VF | B5G |
| B5F | B5D | B4VF | |
| 24 Grades of Thin Leaf | | | |
| C1L | C2F | C3D | C3VF |
| C2L | C3F | C4D | C4VF |
| C3L | C4F | C5D | C5VF |
| C4L | C5F | C3M | C3G |
| C5L | C1D | C4M | C4G |
| C1F | C2D | C5M | C5G |
| 24 Grades of Lugs | | | |
| X1L | X2F | X3D | X3VF |
| X2L | X3F | X4D | X4VF |
| X3L | X4F | X5D | X5VF |
| X4L | X5F | X3M | X3G |
| X5L | X1D | X4M | X4G |
| X1F | X2D | X5M | X5G |

| 5 Grades of Nondescript | | | | |
| N1L | N1D | N1GL | N1GX | N2 |
| 1 Grade of Scrap | | | | |
| | | S | | |

Special factors “U”, “W”, “S” and “SF” may be applied to all grades. Tobacco not covered by the standard grades is designated “No-G.”

Standard Sizes Applicable

| A1, A2, A3 | 2, 3 |
| B1, B2, B3, B4, B5 | 1, 2, 3 |
| C1, C2, C3, C4, C5 | 1, 2, 3 |

[[37 FR 13626](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/37-FR-13626), July 12, 1972, as amended at [49 FR 16757](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/49-FR-16757), Apr. 20, 1984; [51 FR 40407](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/51-FR-40407), Nov. 7, 1986]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**RAYMOND WILLIAMS,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY,** 

**Respondent :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 123 EM 2015** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 2nd day of December, 2015, the Application for Leave to File** 

**Original Process is** GRANTED **, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus or Extraordi nary** 

**Relief is** GRANTED **to the extent it seeks mandamus relief. The Court of Common** 

**Pleas of Philadelphia County is** DIRECTED **to dispose of Petitioner’s pending petition**

**within 90 days.**
#### § 319.55-7 Importations by mail.

Importations of rice straw and rice hulls may be made by mail or cargo, provided that a permit has been issued for the importation in accordance with §§ 319.7 through 319.7-5 and all conditions of the permit are met.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0049)

[83 FR 11865, Mar. 19, 2018]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THERMO INSTRUMENT SYSTEM INC.'S
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 1,2000
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  JAN-01-2000
<CASH>                                                185,492
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         519,101
<ALLOWANCES>                                           29,837
<INVENTORY>                                           327,901
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    1,372,086
<PP&E>                                                441,577
<DEPRECIATION>                                        154,170
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      2,885,358
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               1,003,286
<BONDS>                                               453,494
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                               12,359
<OTHER-SE>                                            972,207
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        2,885,358
<SALES>                                             2,093,537
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    2,093,537
<CGS>                                               1,136,675
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       1,136,675
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      158,466
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        7,301
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     50,988
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       179,683
<INCOME-TAX>                                           75,437
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    87,799
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             0
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                           87,799
<EPS-BASIC>                                            0.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0.67


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 3405
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3405 appear at 76 FR 4808, Jan. 27, 2011.

§ 3405.4 Purpose of the program. The Department of Agriculture is designated as the lead Federal agency for higher education in the food and agricultural sciences. In this context, NIFA has specific responsibility to initiate and support projects to strengthen college and university teaching programs in the food and agricultural sciences. One national initiative for carrying out this responsibility is the competitive Higher Education Challenge Grants Program. A primary goal of the program is to attract and ensure a continual flow of outstanding students into food and agricultural sciences higher education programs and to provide them with an education of the highest quality available anywhere in the world and which reflects the unique needs of the Nation. It is designed to stimulate and enable colleges and universities to provide the quality of education necessary to produce baccalaureate or higher degree level graduates capable of strengthening the Nation's food and agricultural scientific and professional work force. It is intended that projects supported by the program will: ( a ) Address a State, regional, national, or international educational need;
( b ) Involve a creative or nontraditional approach toward addressing that need which can serve as a model to others;
( c ) Encourage and facilitate better working relationships in the university science and education community, as well as between universities and the private sector, to enhance program quality and supplement available resources; and
( d ) Result in benefits which will likely transcend the project duration and USDA support.
J. 

Having considered the response, the reply, and the parties' 

competing motions to dismiss, it appears that respondent's counterclaims 

for assault and intentional infliction of emotional distress' remain pending 

and that no final judgment has been entered. NRAP 3A(b)(1); Lee v. 

GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 996 P.2d 416 (2000); KDI Sylvan Pools, Inc. v. 

Workman, 107 Nev. 340, 810 P.2d 1217 (1991). Accordingly, as the notice 

of appeal was premature, we lack jurisdiction over this appeal, NRAP 

4(a)(6), and we 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 2 

Seca eirt-t; 

Hardesty 

-4 ,049gel" 

Douglas 

'To the extent that the parties also note that respondent's 

counterclaim for attorney fees has not been resolved, a request for 

attorney fees is not a cause of action and would not preclude an order from 

being a final judgment. Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 426, 996 P.2d 

416, 417 (2000) ("[A] final judgment is one that disposes of all the issues 

presented in the case, and leaves nothing for the future consideration of 

the court, except for post-judgment issues such as attorney's fees and 

costs."). 

2To the extent that the parties' competing motions request relief 

other than dismissal for a premature notice of appeal, the parties' motions 

are denied. 

SUPREPAE COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A 
cc: Hon. Douglas W. Herndon, District Judge 

Carolyn Worrell, Settlement Judge 

Law Offices of Richard S. Small, Esq. 

Cary Colt Payne 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 3 

(0) 1947A 4110479
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________ N O . 09
- 19
- 00390
- CV

__________________ BARBARA M. FEIGIN AND MICHAEL E. FEIGIN , Appellant s V. MONTGOMERY CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT , Appellee

__________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 284th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 18
- 07
- 09046
- CV

__________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION
On November 6, 2019, we notified the parties that the notice of appeal did not appear to have been timely filed. The appellants did not file a response. The trial court signed the judgment on July 24, 2019, and the appellate timetables were not extended by th e timely filing of a motion for new trial

. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a). Notice of appeal was due to be filed on October 22, 2019. See id

.2 Appellants filed a notice of appeal on November 4, 2019, more than thirty days from the date of the judgment and outs ide th e period for which we may grant
an extension of time to perfect appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. This Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM Submitted on December 11, 2019 Opinion Delivered December 12, 2019 Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20 22

- 1172

_____________________________
A NDREW L AWYER , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Stephen S. Everett , Judge

. February 27, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
O STERHAUS , C.J., an d B.L. T HOMAS an d W INOKUR , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Michael Jerome Titus, Assistant Conflict Counsel, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Michael Schaub, Assistant Attorney General
, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

April 28, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
130096 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 130096 COA: 265708 Berrien CC: 2005-401388-FH LESLIE ALLEN FROEBER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 9, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

K ELLY , J., would hold this case in abeyance for People v Drohan , lv gtd 472 Mich 881 (2005).

s0424 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28, 2006

Clerk
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:92cr4013-WS

PATRICIA CLARKE,

Defendant.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc.

1763) docketed October 4, 2007. The magistrate judge recommends that the

defendant's motion for relief from judgment (doc. 1746) be denied. The defendant has

filed no objections to the report and recommendation.

Upon review of the record, this court has determined that the magistrate judge’s

report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 1763) is hereby

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order.

2. The defendant’s motion for relief from judgment (doc. 1746) is hereby

DENIED.

Case 4:92-cr-04013-WS-CAS Document 1775 Filed 11/13/07 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 4:92cr4013-WS

3. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.

DONE AND ORDERED this 13th day of November , 2007.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:92-cr-04013-WS-CAS Document 1775 Filed 11/13/07 Page 2 of 2
§ 322.8 Packaging of shipments. ( a ) *Adult honeybees.* All shipments of adult honeybees imported into the United States under this subpart: ( 1 ) Must be packaged to prevent the escape of any bees or bee pests;
( 2 ) Must not include any brood, comb, pollen, or honey; and
( 3 ) May include sugar water or crystallized sugar (*e.g.*, candy) for use as food during transit.
( b ) *Bees other than honeybees* — ( 1 ) *Adult bees.* All adult bees other than honeybees imported into the United States must be packaged to prevent the escape of any bees or bee pests.
( 2 ) *Live brood.* For live brood of bees other than honeybees, packages: ( i ) Must be securely closed;
( ii ) May not include any soil, except for that which is present in nest cells that include developing, immature bees;
( iii ) May include only packing materials that were grown or produced in the exporting region and that meet all other applicable requirements of this chapter, such as the regulations pertaining to unmanufactured wood in part 319 of this chapter and the plant pest regulations in part 330 of this chapter; and
( iv ) May consist of brood housed in new or used bee boards, provided the bee boards meet all applicable requirements of this part.
#### § 319.75-7 Costs and charges.

The services of the inspector during regularly assigned hours of duty and at the usual places of duty shall be furnished without cost to the importer.[3] The importer shall be responsible for arrangements for treatments required under § 319.75-4. Any treatment required under § 319.75-4 for a regulated article shall be performed at the port of entry by a nongovernmental fumigator at the importer's expense, and shall be performed under the supervision of an inspector. Plant Protection and Quarantine will not be responsible for any costs or charges, other than those indicated in this section.

[46 FR 38334, July 27, 1981, as amended at 79 FR 19811, Apr. 10, 2014; 84 FR 2429, Feb. 7, 2019]

###### Footnotes -
  319.75-7

[3] Provisions relating to costs for other services of an inspector are contained in 7 CFR part 354.
#### The State ex rel. Yarber, Appellee and Cross-Appellant, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio et al, Appellants and Cross-Appellees.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Yarber v. Indus. Comm.*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 335.]

(No. 97-1457

Submitted August 19, 1998

Decided October 7, 1998.)

*Harris & Burgin*and *Denise L. Devney,*for appellee and cross-appellant.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Steven P. Fixler,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellants and cross-appellees.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Douglas and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:95cr3093 LAC

CHARLES J. SPIGNER

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on June 25, 2009 

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 

3582(c)(2) 

Filed by DEFT PRO SE on 5/29/09 Doc.# 246

RESPONSES:

 on Doc.#

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Mary Maloy

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 26 day of

th

June, 2009, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) See Doc 189 and Doc 244.

s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Document No. 

Case 3:95-cr-03093-LC-CJK Document 256 Filed 06/26/09 Page 1 of 1