alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 10.21

February 3, 2005

Mr. J. Morton Davis
D.H. Blair Investment Banking Corporation
44 Wall Street
New York, NY 10005

Re:  D.H. Blair Investment Banking Corp / News Communications, Inc.
     $200,000 Note Conversion

Dear Morty:

          Reference is made to that certain 8% Convertible Note dated March 7,
2001, made by News Communications, Inc. ("NCI") in favor of D.H. Blair
Investment Banking Corp. ("Blair") in the original principal amount of $200,000,
as extended by letters dated December 19, 2001, January 1, 2003, May 8, 2003,
and February 3, 2004 (as extended, the "Note"). As of the date hereof, accrued
and unpaid interest on the Note is $62,597.26.

          This letter sets forth our understanding that, in full satisfaction of
NCI's obligations under the Note, including accrued and unpaid interest thereon,
NCI shall issue to Blair 375,139 shares of Common Stock of NCI. In this regard,
Blair shall surrender the Note to NCI in exchange for a certificate or
certificates representing the shares.

          If the foregoing accurately sets forth our understanding, please sign
where indicated below and return an executed copy to me.

Very truly yours,
NEWS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.


By: /s/ James A. Finkelstein
----------------------------------------
James A. Finkelstein
President and Chief Executive Officer


D.H. BLAIR INVESTMENT BANKING CORPORATION


By: /s/ J. Morton Davis
----------------------------------------
J. Morton Davis
Chairman
April 29, 2010

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Changes to background document Preliminary Review of Environmental Justice Impacts Resulting from OMB Comments

FROM: Marc Thomas Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery

TO: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329

The attached document is a copy of the Preliminary Review of Environmental Justice Impacts

, which illustrates the changes EPA made to the do cument as a result of the review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Changes made pursuant to OMB comments are identified by comment highlighted changes. Additional changes throughout the document were made

based on internal discussion. This redlined/str ikeout copy resulted from a comparison of the

final version sent to OMB with the version EPA originally sent to OMB for review (4-13-10). Conforming changes were made to other Enviro nmental Justice-related materials. A final

“clean” version of this document is also located in the docket for today’s rule.

Attachment
**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, each of the parties hereto has caused this Joinder Agreement to be dulyexecuted by the authorized person whose signature appears below.     MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC       By: /s/ Janice Fetsch Name: Janice Fetsch    Title: Authorized Signatory       CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC.       By: /s/ Laurie A. Hesslein Name: Laurie A. Hesslein    Title: Managing Director       CITIGROUP MANAGED FUTURES LLC       By: /s/ Jerry Pascucci Name: Jerry Pascucci    Title: President       EACH OF THE FUNDS LISTED ON EXHIBIT A HERETO  By: Citigroup Managed Futures LLC, the general    partner or trading manager of each Fund       By: /s/ Jerry Pascucci Name: Jerry Pascucci    Title: President
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Southern Trust Securities Holding Corp., Inc. (the “Corporation”) certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and the information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.






November 15, 2010
By:
/s/ Robert EscobioRobert Escobio

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer








This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document, and may not be disclosed, distributed or used by any person for any reason other than as specifically required by law.
----

----

Fox Petroleum Inc. 10-Q

|   | (1)    | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2011, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

| Date: January 13, 2012 | By:    | /s/ James Renfro                                                               |   |
|------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                   |   | James Renfro                                                                   |   |
|                   |   | Interim Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Fox Petroleum Inc. |   |

----
Editorial Note on Part 1944
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1944 appear at 80 FR 9885, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1944.256 Eligibility for services. ( a ) *Participants, other residents, and nonresidents.* Such individuals are eligible either to participate in CHSP or to receive CHSP services, if they qualify under section 802(e)(1), (4) and (5). Under this paragraph, temporarily disabled persons are also eligible.
( b ) *Economic need.* In providing services under CHSP, grantees shall give priority to very low income individuals, and shall consider their service needs in selecting program participants.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.42

                           CRITICAL THERAPEUTICS, INC.

                               2005 COMPANY GOALS


GOAL ONE: TO ENHANCE THE COMMERCIAL VALUE OF ZILEUTON

     -  Make regulatory filings

     -  Launch Zyflo(R)

     -  Achieve business development goals


GOAL TWO: TO PROGRESS THE COMPANY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT PIPELINE

     -  Achieve pre-clinical and clinical development milestones and business
        development goals for other product candidates


GOAL THREE: MAINTAIN THE COMPANY'S FINANCIAL POSITION

     -  Manage cash balance


GOAL FOUR: CREATE AN EFFECTIVE ORGANIZATION

     -  Recruit and retain employees

     -  Make important key appointments
98-944.

#### State ex rel. Overlow v. Indus. Comm.

Franklin App. No. 97APD03-414. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. Upon consideration of appellants’ application for dismissal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
#### § 29.3563 Uniformity.

An element of quality which describes the consistency of a lot of tobacco as it is prepared for market. Uniformity is expressed in grade specifications as a percentage. The percentage is applicable to group, quality, and color. (See Rule 14, § 29.3615.)

[30 FR 9207, July 23, 1965. Redesignated at 49 FR 16759, Apr. 20, 1984]
#### § 29.2406 Rule 15.

Uniformity shall be expressed in percentages. These percentages shall govern the portion of a lot which must meet each specification of the grade. The minor portion must be closely related but may be of a different group, quality, and color from the major portion. Specified percentages of uniformity shall not affect limitations established by other rules.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Leroy *905Williams, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered April 26, 1979, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment with a minimum of three years and a maximum of nine years. Judgment modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentence to an indeterminate term of imprisonment with a maximum of six years. As so modified, judgment affirmed. The sentence was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Mangano, J. P., Gulotta, Cohalan and Margett, JJ., concur.
§ 301.75-3 Regulated articles. ( a ) *List of regulated articles.* The Administrator has determined that certain articles present a risk of spread of citrus canker. A list of all such regulated articles is found on the internet at *www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/planthealth/plant-pest-and-disease-programs/pests-and-diseases/citrus/citrus-canker .* Lists of all regulated articles may also be obtained by request from any local Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ) office; local offices are listed in telephone directories and on the internet at *www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/planthealth/ppq-program-overview/sphd .*
( b ) *Normal process for designating additional regulated articles.* ( 1 ) If the Administrator determines that an article not already listed at *www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/planthealth/plant-pest-and-disease-programs/pests-and-diseases/citrus/citrus-canker* presents a risk of spread of citrus canker, APHIS will publish a notice in the Federal Register proposing to designate the article as a regulated article for citrus canker. The notice will provide the basis for this determination, and will request public comment.
( 2 ) If no comments are received on the notice, or if the comments do not change the Administrator's determination, APHIS will publish a second notice in the Federal Register designating the article as a regulated article for citrus canker and listing it.
( c ) *Immediate designation of regulated articles.* An inspector may designate any other product, article, or means of conveyance as a regulated article, if the inspector determines that it presents a risk of spread of citrus canker and the person in possession thereof has actual notice that the product, article, or means of conveyance is subject to the provisions of this subpart.
[87 FR 80009, Dec. 29, 2022]
###### Editorial Note on Part 3406

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3406 appear at 76 FR 4809, Jan. 27, 2011.

#### § 3406.12 Program application materials—teaching.

Program application materials in an application package will be made available to eligible institutions upon request. These materials include the program announcement, the administrative provisions for the program, and the forms needed to prepare and submit teaching grant applications under the program.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

May 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

135922 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,
Justices

v SC: 135922 COA: 274714 Wayne CC: 06-007908-01 TYRONE SELENA MOORE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 22, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

l0519 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 27, 2008

Clerk
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AVEO Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ended June 30,2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Tuan Ha-Ngoc, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to hisknowledge on the date hereof: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: August 6, 2010
Exhibit 32.2

                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

	In connection with the Quarterly Report of Third-Order
Nanotechnologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period
ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew Ashton,
Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date: September 13, 2007


                               /s/ Andrew J. Ashton
                               ---------------------------------------
                               Andrew Ashton, Treasurer
                               Third-Order Nanotechnologies, Inc.
#### § 319.41-4 Notice of arrival by permittee.

Immediately upon arrival of the importation at the port of arrival the permittee shall submit, in duplicate, notice to the Plant Protection and Quarantine Programs, through the U.S. Collector of Customs, or, in the case of Guam, through the Customs officer of the Government of Guam, on forms provided for that purpose, stating the number of the permit, the date of entry, the name of ship or vessel, railroad, or other carrier, the country and locality where the articles were grown, the name of the foreign shipper, the quantity or number of bales or containers, and the marks and numbers on the bales or containers, the port of arrival, and the name of the importer or broker at the port of arrival.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0049)

[24 FR 10788, Dec. 29, 1959, as amended at 48 FR 57466, Dec. 30, 1983]
#### In re COOPER.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 27, 1906.)

In the matter of the application of George L. Cooper for admission to the bar.

No opinion, Application for admission to the bar granted.
#### STANLEY, Respondent, v. STANLEY, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

September 18, 1906.)

Action by Sarah Taylor Stanley against James William Stanley.

No opinion. Motion denied. Defendant may, within 20 days, serve copies of appeal papers upon plaintiff's attorney, with written corrections as to the matters specified by plaintiff's attorney in his letter of July 13th, excepting as to specifications therein 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7.
#### Payne, Appellant, *v.*Jeffreys, Warden, Appellee.

[Cite as *Payne v. Jeffreys,*109 Ohio St.3d 239, 2006-Ohio-2288.]

(No. 2005-1915

Submitted April 11, 2006

Decided May 24, 2006.)

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing a petition for a writ.of habeas corpus.

{¶ 2} In July 2005, appellant, inmate Sir Lawrence E. Payne, filed a petition in the Court of Appeals for Marion County for a writ of habeas corpus to compel appellee, his warden, Rob Jeffreys, to release him from prison. Payne claimed that he was entitled to the writ because his indictment violated R.C. 2939.20 and thereby rendered the indictment “of no legal force.”

*240Sir Lawrence E. Payne, pro se.

Jim Petro, Attorney General, and Diane Mallory, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

{¶ 3} On September 8, 2005, the court of appeals dismissed the petition because “[h]abeas corpus is not available to challenge either the validity or the sufficiency of an indictment.”

{¶ 4} In his appeal as of right, Payne asserts that the court of appeals erred in dismissing his petition. He claims that habeas corpus is appropriate because his indictment violated R.C. 2939.20, which requires the foreman of the grand jury to “indorse on such indictment the words ‘A true bill’ and subscribe his name as foreman.” We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

{¶ 5} Notwithstanding Payne’s assertions to the contrary, his claim attacks the validity and sufficiency of his indictment and should have been raised on direct appeal of his criminal conviction and sentence rather than in habeas corpus. See *Thornton v. Russell*(1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 93, 94, 694 N.E.2d 464 (claim that indictment was void because the grand-jury foreman did not manually endorse that the indictment was a true bill); *Malone v. Lane,*96 Ohio St.3d 415, 2002-Ohio-4908, 775 N.E.2d 527, ¶ 1, 4 (claims that there was no endorsement that the indictment was a true bill and that the grand jury did not certify the indictment).

{¶ 6} Moreover, Payne’s indictment satisfied R.C. 2939.20, since the words “a true bill” were in a preprinted indictment form and the grand-jury foreman subscribed his name as foreman under that endorsement. See *Ruch v. State*(1924), 111 Ohio St. 580, 585, 146 N.E. 67; *Key v. State,*Franklin App. No. 04AP-113, 2004-Ohio-5341, 2004 WL 2898757, ¶ 7-10.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.
Additional SNAP Submittal Information

Kline, Kelley (GE Indust, ConsInd) to: Monica Shimamura 01/30/2009 11:15 AM

Cc:

"Harrington, Bonnie (GE Indust, ConsInd)"

GE’s answers to the additional questions from 12.22.08 are Confidential Business Information

(CBI). If you have questions regarding CBI material please contact Monica Shimamura, EPA at 

202.343.9337.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS58103 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
§ 30.40 Class 5; cigar-binder types and groups. ( a ) *Type 51.* That type of cigar-leaf tobacco commonly known as Connecticut Valley Broadleaf or Connecticut Broadleaf, produced principally in the Connecticut River Valley.
( b ) *Type 52.* That type of cigar-leaf tobacco commonly known as Connecticut Valley Havana Seed or Havana Seed of Connecticut and Massachusetts, produced principally in the Connecticut River Valley. Groups applicable to types 51 and 52: B—Binder. X—Nonbinder. N—Nondescript, as defined. S—Scrap, as defined.
( c ) *Type 53.* That type of cigar-leaf tobacco commonly known as York State or Havana Seed of New York, and Pennsylvania, produced principally in the Big Flats and Onondaga sections of New York State, and extending into Pennsylvania.
( d ) *Type 54.* That type of cigar-leaf tobacco commonly known as Southern Wisconsin Cigar-leaf or Southern Wisconsin Binder-type, produced principally south and east of the Wisconsin River.
( e ) *Type 55.* That type of cigar-leaf tobacco commonly known as Northern Wisconsin Cigar-leaf or Northern Wisconsin Binder-type, produced principally north and west of the Wisconsin River and extending into Minnesota.
Groups applicable to types 53, 54, and 55: B—Binder. C—Stripper. X—Straight Stripped. Y—Farm Filler. N—Nondescript, as defined. S—Scrap, as defined.
<B><FONT SIZE=2><P ALIGN="RIGHT">EXHIBIT 10.24</P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"></P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER">SUMMARY OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS</P>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"></P>
</B><P> </P>
<P>Non-employee directors of Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. (the
"Company") will receive the following compensation in 2005:</P>


<UL>
<LI>An annual retainer fee of $20,000;</LI></UL>



<UL>
<LI>The committee chairpersons will receive additional annual fees as
follows:</LI></UL>

</FONT>
<P ALIGN="CENTER"><CENTER><TABLE BORDER CELLSPACING=1 CELLPADDING=7 WIDTH=450>
<TR><TD WIDTH="76%" VALIGN="TOP">
<FONT SIZE=2><P>Board of Directors Chairperson</FONT></TD>
<TD WIDTH="24%" VALIGN="TOP">
<FONT SIZE=2><P>$10,000</FONT></TD>
</TR>
<TR><TD WIDTH="76%" VALIGN="TOP">
<FONT SIZE=2><P>Audit Committee Chairperson</FONT></TD>
<TD WIDTH="24%" VALIGN="TOP">
<FONT SIZE=2><P>$15,000</FONT></TD>
</TR>
<TR><TD WIDTH="76%" VALIGN="TOP">
<FONT SIZE=2><P>Compensation Committee Chairperson</FONT></TD>
<TD WIDTH="24%" VALIGN="TOP">
<FONT SIZE=2><P>$10,000</FONT></TD>
</TR>
<TR><TD WIDTH="76%" VALIGN="TOP">
<FONT SIZE=2><P>Nominating & Governance Committee Chairperson</FONT></TD>
<TD WIDTH="24%" VALIGN="TOP">
<FONT SIZE=2><P>$  5,000</FONT></TD>
</TR>
</TABLE>
</CENTER></P>

<FONT SIZE=2>

<UL>
<LI>A fee payable for each meeting attended of the Company's Board of Directors,
or committee thereof, equal to $1,000;</LI></UL>



<UL>
<LI>Reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses incurred to attend such
meetings;</LI></UL>



<UL>
<LI>A restricted stock grant of 1,200 shares of common stock on January 3, 2005
under the Company's Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Award and Incentive Plan,
such shares vesting in full on January 1, 2008; and</LI></UL>



<UL>
<LI>A tax "gross-up" fee of $105,091.20, equal to 40% of the value of the
restricted stock grant of 1,200 shares of common stock based on the closing
price of our common stock on January 1, 2005.</LI></UL>


<P>The Company's non-employee directors may elect to defer all or any portion of
the fees above in accordance with the Company's deferred compensation plan for
its directors.</P>

<P>Directors who are also employees of the Company will not receive any
compensation for their services as directors of the Company. </P></FONT>
#### § 30.21 Foreign matter.

Any substance or material extraneous to tobacco leaves, such as dirt, sand, stalks, suckers, straws, and strings.
§ 295.8 Requests. ( a ) Requests for FNS program records under 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(3) shall be made in accordance with USDA Administrative Regulations 7 CFR 1.6 and addressed to the appropriate FNS official listed below: ( 1 ) Food Stamp program records—Requests for Food Stamp information should be addressed to the Director of the appropriate Division (Program Development Division, Benefit Redemption Division, or Program Accountability Division) at the following address: Food and Nutrition Service, USDA, 3101 Park Center Drive, Alexandria, VA, 22302-1500.
( 2 ) Child Nutrition Program records—Director, Child Nutrition Division, Food and Nutrition Service, USDA, 3101 Park Center Drive, Alexandria, VA 22302-1500.
( 3 ) Food Distribution Program records—Director, Food Distribution Division, Food and Nutrition Service, USDA, 3101 Park Center Drive, Alexandria, VA 22302-1500.
( 4 ) Supplemental Food Program records—Director, Supplemental Food Programs Division, Food and Nutrition Service, USDA, 3101 Park Center Drive, Alexandria, VA 22302-1500.
( b ) If the requester is unable to determine the official to whom his request should be addressed, he should address it to: Freedom of Information Act Officer, Information Technology Division, 3101 Park Center Drive, Alexandria, VA 22302. The Freedom of Information Act Officer will refer such requests to the appropriate official.
( c ) The officials outlined in paragraph (a) are authorized to make determinations in accordance with USDA Administrative Regulations at 7 CFR 1.8.