alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

Exhibit 99.2

                             **CERTIFICATION OF 10KSB**

I,  Cathleen  Shoenfeld of Eldorado  Artesian  Springs,  Inc.  (the  "Company"),
certify,  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 that:

     (1)  The Annual  Report on Form  10-KSB of the  Company  for the year ended
          March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements of
          Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 (15
          U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

                                        /s/ Cathleen Shoenfeld

Dated:  June 30, 2003
```
PUBLIC LAW 108–401—OCT. 30, 2004 118 STAT. 2255

Public Law 108–401

108th Congress

An Act

To amend title 5, United States Code, to authorize appropriations for the Administrative Conference of the United States for fiscal years 2005, 2006, and 2007, and

for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Regulatory Improvement

Act of 2004’’.

SEC. 2. PURPOSES.

(a) PURPOSES.—Section 591 of title 5, United States Code, is

amended to read as follows:

‘‘§ 591. Purposes

‘‘The purposes of this subchapter are—

‘‘(1) to provide suitable arrangements through which Federal agencies, assisted by outside experts, may cooperatively

study mutual problems, exchange information, and develop recommendations for action by proper authorities to the end that

private rights may be fully protected and regulatory activities

and other Federal responsibilities may be carried out expeditiously in the public interest;

‘‘(2) to promote more effective public participation and efficiency in the rulemaking process;

‘‘(3) to reduce unnecessary litigation in the regulatory

process;

‘‘(4) to improve the use of science in the regulatory process;

and

‘‘(5) to improve the effectiveness of laws applicable to the

regulatory process.’’.

(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Title 5 of the United States

Code is amended—

(1) in section 594 by striking ‘‘purpose’’ and inserting ‘‘purposes’’; and

(2) in the table of sections of chapter 5 of part I by

amending the item relating to section 591 to read as follows:

‘‘591. Purposes’’.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

Section 596 of title 5, United States Code, is amended to

read as follows:

Federal

Regulatory

Improvement Act

of 2004.

5 USC 101 note.

Oct. 30, 2004

[H.R. 4917]

118 STAT. 2256 PUBLIC LAW 108–401—OCT. 30, 2004

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4917 (S. 2979):

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):

Oct. 8, considered and passed House.

Oct. 11, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

‘‘§ 596. Authorization of appropriations

‘‘There are authorized to be appropriated to carry out this

subchapter not more than $3,000,000 for fiscal year 2005,

$3,100,000 for fiscal year 2006, and $3,200,000 for fiscal year 2007.

Of any amounts appropriated under this section, not more than

$2,500 may be made available in each fiscal year for official representation and entertainment expenses for foreign dignitaries.’’.

Approved October 30, 2004.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

Certification of Treasurer



I, Andrew Ashton, Treasurer, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Lightwave Logic, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: August 14, 2008





/s/ Andrew J. Ashton

Andrew Ashton, Treasurer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 26, 2016

s0718 

# Order

Clerk July 26, 2016

152007 & (16)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 152007

COA: 326670

Wayne CC: 92

- 010859

- FC

JESSE LEE AGNEW,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 18, 2015 order

of the Court of Appeals and the defendant’s motion to remand are considered. We

DIRECT the Wayne County Prosecuting Attorney to answer the application for leave to

appeal and the motion within 28 days after the date of this order.

The application for leave to appeal and the motion to remand remain pending.

M C C ORMAC K

, J., did not participate because of her prior involvement in this case.
United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 9, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 04-11035

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 Plaintiff - Appellee

 v.

DAMACIO ANDRADE-CASTANEDA

 Defendant - Appellant

---------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

 for the Northern District of Texas

(03-CR-295)

---------------------

Before JONES, BARKSDALE, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

IT IS ORDERED that the Appellee’s unopposed motion to vacate

the sentence is granted.

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Appellee’s unopposed motion

to remand the case to the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division for resentencing is

granted.

__________________

* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R.

47.5.4.
 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Appellee’s unopposed motion

to correct the record to include page 10 of the indictment is

granted.
Case 3:97-cr-00116-RV   Document 134   Filed 03/28/06   Page 1 of 1
149 So.2d 768

#### John H. MICHELL, v. LOUISIANA STATE BOARD OF OPTOMETRY EXAMINERS.

No. 46549.

Feb. 18, 1963.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
EXHIBIT 10.46

                               LEASE AMENDMENT # 1
                               -------------------

         Agreement, made as of the 22nd day of December, 1999, by and between
Newtown Street Road Associates, a Pennsylvania Limited Partnership having its
principal place of business at Fifth Floor, Two Bala Plaza Office Building, Bala
Cynwyd, Pennsylvania, C/O Arthur J. Kania ( "Landlord") and Medstaff, Inc., a
Pennsylvania Corporation doing business in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and
having its executive offices at Benson Building # 2 (The Medstaff Building), 297
South Newtown Street Road, Newtown Square, Pennsylvania ("Tenant").

                                   WITNESSETH
                                   ----------

WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant have entered into a lease of 17,500 square feet in
the building known as Benson Building # 2 (The Medstaff Building), 297 South
Newtown Street Road, Newtown Square, Pennsylvania, which lease commenced January
1, 1999, and expires July 31, 2004.

WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant desire to extend this lease in the respects
hereinafter set forth.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency whereof are hereby acknowledged, and
intending to be legally bound hereby the parties hereto agree as follows:

         1.       Landlord and Tenant hereby agree to extend the term of the
                  lease by three months beginning August 1, 2004, and extending
                  until October 30, 2004.

         2.       Without prior notice or demand, Tenant agrees to pay monthly
                  base rent of $27,171.92 on the first day of each month of the
                  extended term, August 1, 2004, through October 30, 2004.

Tenant shall continue to provide its electric, utility, and janitorial service
during the extended term pursuant to the Lease.

Except as expressly modified by this Agreement, the Lease is hereby ratified,
confirmed, and continued in full force and effect, this Agreement shall be
binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective
heirs, executors, legal representatives, successors, and assigns.

IN WITNESS WHEROF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Agreement as of
the day and year first above written.

By: /s/ Arthur Kania
    -----------------------------------
        Newtown Street Road Associates

By: /s/ William Davis
        -------------------------------
        Medstaff, Inc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION 

JAMI CLAIRE et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. Case No. 4:20-cv-00020-MW/MAF 

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 

MANAGEMENT SERVICES et al., 

Defendants. 

_______________________________/ 

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO WITHDRAW AS ATTORNEY 

Pursuant to Local Rule 11.1(H)(1)(b), Pamela Flores, attorney for Plaintiff Ahmir Murphy, 

moves for leave to withdraw from this matter. 

1. Beginning September 21, 2023, Ms. Flores will no longer be employed at Legal Services 

of Greater Miami, Inc., which represents Sgt. Murphy. 

2. On September 12, 2023, Ms. Flores provided notice to Sgt. Murphy of her intent to 

withdraw from representation. Sgt. Murphy had no objection. 

3. Sgt. Murphy continues to be represented by Legal Services of Greater Miami, Inc., as 

well as the other plaintiff attorneys of record. 

4. On September 15, 2023, Ms. Flores provided notice to Defendants’ counsel of her intent 

to withdraw and they voiced no objection to the relief requested in this motion. 

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request that this Court grant Pamela Flores leave to 

withdraw. 

September 21, 2023 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Pamela Flores 

Case 4:20-cv-00020-MW-MAF Document 162 Filed 09/21/23 Page 1 of 3
PAMELA FLORES, Fla. Bar No. 0124363 

pflores@legalservicesmiami.org

JEFFREY HEARNE, Fla. Bar No. 512060 

jhearne@legalservicesmiami.org 

JOCELYN ARMAND, Fla. Bar No.44264 

jarmand@legalservicesmiami.org 

Legal Services of Greater Miami, Inc. 

4343 W Flagler Street, Suite 100 

Miami, FL 33134 

(305) 438-2403 

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF MURPHY 

SIMONE CHRISS, Fla. Bar No. 124062 

simone.chriss@southernlegal.org 

KIRSTEN ANDERSON, Fla. Bar No. 17179 

kirsten.anderson@southernlegal.org 

JODI SIEGEL, Fla. Bar No. 511617 

jodi.siegel@southernlegal.org 

Southern Legal Counsel, Inc. 

1229 NW 12th Avenue 

Gainesville, FL 32601 

(352) 271-8890 

DANIEL TILLEY, Fla. Bar No. 102882 

dtilley@aclufl.org

Caroline A. McNamara 

ACLU Foundation of Florida 

4343 West Flagler St., Suite 400, 

Miami, FL 33134 

(786) 363-2714 

ATTORNEYS FOR ALL PLAINTIFFS 

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERRAL 

On September 15, 2023, Ms. Flores provided notice to Defendants’ counsel of her intent to 

withdraw and they voiced no objection to the relief requested in this motion. 

Case 4:20-cv-00020-MW-MAF Document 162 Filed 09/21/23 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF WORD COUNT 

Pursuant to N.D. Loc. R. 7.1(F), the above motion contains 410 words, which includes the 

headings, footnotes, and quotations, but does not include the case style, signature block or 

Certificates of Word Count and Service. 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on this 21st day of September, 2023, a true copy of the foregoing has been

filed with the Court utilizing its CM/ECF system, which will transmit a notice of electronic filing 

to all Plaintiffs’ and Defendants’ counsel of record registered with the Court for that purpose. 

 

 /s/ Pamela Flores 

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF MURPHY 

Case 4:20-cv-00020-MW-MAF Document 162 Filed 09/21/23 Page 3 of 3
§ 319.8-23 Treatment. ( a ) ( 1 ) Vacuum fumigation as required in this subpart must be conducted in accordance with part 305 of this chapter.
( 2 ) After cotton and covers have been vacuum fumigated they shall be so marked under the supervision of an inspector. Such material may thereafter be distributed, forwarded, or shipped without further plant quarantine entry restriction.
( 3 ) Cotton and covers held by an importer for vacuum fumigation must be stored under conditions satisfactory to the inspector.
( 4 ) Prompt vacuum fumigation of cotton and covers (other than high density cotton free of surface contamination) will be required at non-northern ports. Similar prompt vacuum fumigation will be required at Norfolk, Virginia, during the period June 15 to October 15 of each year, except for covers which have been used to contain only lint, linters, or waste, and the bales of which are compressed to a density of 28 or more pounds per cubic foot and are free of surface contamination.
( b ) An inspector may authorize the substitution of processing, utilization, or other form of treatment for vacuum fumigation when in his opinion such other treatment, selected by him from administratively authorized procedures, will be effective in eliminating infestation of the pink bollworm.
[24 FR 10788, Dec. 29, 1959, as amended at 75 FR 4251, Jan. 26, 2010]
§ 301.48-2 Authorization to designate, and terminate designation of, regulated airports. ( a ) An inspector may declare any airport within a quarantined State to be a regulated airport when he or she determines that adult populations of Japanese beetle exist during daylight hours at the airport to the degree that aircraft constitute a threat to spread the Japanese beetle and aircraft destined for the States listed in § 301.48(b) may be leaving the airport.
( b ) An inspector shall terminate the designation provided for under paragraph (a) of this section when he or she determines that adult populations of Japanese beetle no longer exist at the airport to the degree that the aircraft pose a threat to spread the Japanese beetle.
[44 FR 24035, Apr. 24, 1979, as amended at 61 FR 32640, June 25, 1996]
NUMBER 13-10-00521-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

CYNTHIA VARELA, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. 

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 103rd District Court 

of Cameron County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Cynthia Varela, attempted to perfect an appeal from a conviction for

injury to an elderly individual. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Sentence in this matter was imposed on April 8, 2010, no motion for new trial was 

filed, and notice of appeal was filed on September 22, 2010. On September 30, 2010, 

the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that it appeared that the appeal was not timely 
2

perfected. Appellant was advised that the appeal would be dismissed if the defect was 

not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of the Court=s directive. On 

October 12, 2010, counsel filed a motion to extend time to file notice of appeal stating that 

he e-filed a notice of appeal and motion to withdraw to Cameron County, but was 

unaware that Cameron County did not accept e-filings for criminal cases and they were 

rejected. 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.2 provides that an appeal is perfected when 

notice of appeal is filed within thirty days after the day sentence is imposed or suspended 

in open court unless a motion for new trial is timely filed. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). The 

time within which to file the notice may be enlarged if, within fifteen days after the deadline 

for filing the notice, the party files the notice of appeal and a motion complying with Rule 

10.5(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See id. 26.3. Neither appellant’s 

notice of appeal, nor her motion for extension of time was filed within the 15-day time 

period. 

This Court's appellate jurisdiction in a criminal case is invoked by a timely filed 

notice of appeal. Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). Absent a 

timely filed notice of appeal, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the 

merits of the appeal in a criminal case and can take no action other than to dismiss the 

appeal for want of jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 

1998). Appellant may be entitled to an out-of-time appeal by filing a post-conviction writ 

of habeas corpus returnable to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals; however, the 

availability of that remedy is beyond the jurisdiction of this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM.
3

PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, ' 3(a) (Vernon 2005); see also Ex parte Garcia, 988 S.W.2d 240 

(Tex. Crim. App. 1999).

The appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. All pending motions 

are likewise DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 

18th day of November, 2010.
Ms. Cheryl Newton Acting Director 

Air and Radiation Division USEPA, Region 5 77 West Jackson Blvd. Chicago, Illinois 60604 

Re: Infrastructure State Implementation Plan - Emergency Episode Requirement 

Dear Ms. Newton: Section 110(a)(2) of the Clean Air Act ("CAY) requires states to submit State Implementation 

Plans ("SIPs") that address general requirements for attaining and maintaining the National Ambient Air Quality Standards ("NAAQS") for criteria pollutants (hereinafter "infrastructure SIP"). Further, states are required to submit SIP revisions after the United States Environmental 

Protection Agency ("USEPA") revises or amends a NAAQS to affirm that the state meets the 

requirements of Section 110(a) (2) for the new pollutant. The Illinois Environmental Protection Agency ("Illinois EPA") submitted a letter to USEPA, dated December 27,2007, confirming the 

State of Illinois' continued commitment to meet the requirements of Section 110(a)(2). This 

letter supplements that submittal that identified how the State of Illinois has satisfied the 

"infrastructure" elements for SIPs required under Section 110(a)(2). 

Subsection (G) of Section 110(a)(2) requires states to address emergency episodes. Pursuant to 

Section 34 of the Illinois Environmental Protection Act ("Act") [415 ILCS51341, the Illinois 

Pollution Control Board ("Board") has adopted regulations to address emergency episodes at 35 Ill. Adm. Code Part 244, including regulations for PMlo episodes. The Illinois EPA believes that 

these levels are protective of the public's health with respect to PM2.s levels and satisfy the 

requirements of Section 110(a)(2)(G). However, Illinois has the legal authority needed to amend emergency episode rules set forth in Part 244 to include PM2.s pursuant to Sections 4,9, 10 and 27 of the Act. [415 ILCS 5/4,9, 10, 

and 271. The Illinois EPA commits to submitting such amendments to the Board once USEPA 

promulgates significant harm levels, i.e., the levels needed to establish concentration levels used to protect against emergency episode levels of PM2.s. The Illinois EPA believes that in all cases 

the current levels in Illinois' rules, which are based on PMlo concentration levels, will also, serve to protect against emergency episode levels of PM2.s. 

ROCKFORD - 4302 North Main Street, RocMord, IL 61 103 - (81 5) 987-7760 . DES PLAINES - 951 1 W. Harrison St., Des Plaines, IL 6001 6 - (847) 294-4000 

ELGIN - 595 South State, Elgin, IL 60123 - (847) 608-3131 . PEORIA - 541 5 N. University St., Peoria, 1L 61614 - (309) 693-5463 

BUREAU OF LAND - PEORIA - 7620 N. University St., Peoria, IL 61614 - (309) 693-5462 . CHAMPAIGN - 2125 South First Street, Champaign, IL 61820 - (21 7) 278-5800 

COLLINSVILLE - 2009 Mall Street, Collinsville, IL 62234 - (61 8) 346-5120 . MARION - 2309 W. Main St., Suite 11 6, Marion, IL 62959 - (618) 993-7200 
Bureau Chief, Bureau of Air 

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency 

1021 North Grand Avenue East, P.O. Box 19276 

Springfield, Illinois 62794-9276