alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6840
SCOTT SOWELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CORRECTIONAL OFFICER II WHEELER, Prison Guard, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-1604-JFM) Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: January 13, 1998 Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Scott Sowell, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Scott Sowell appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint without prejudice for failure toexhaust administrative remedies. The district court properly required exhaustion of administrative remedies under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1997e(a) (West Supp. 1997). Because Sowell did not demonstrate to the district court that he had exhausted administrative remedies or that such remedies were not available, the court's dismissal of the action, without prejudice, was not an abuse of discretion. We therefore affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

EDDIE MARCELLE WHEELER,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:03-cv-00140-MP-AK

SIVETHA COLLINS,

DARBY D MARSHALL,

RAJ PURUSH TERKONDA,

UNITED STATES,

JOHN G WESTINE,

Defendants.

___________________________/

O R D E R 

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Disclosure. (Doc.

42). Even though the motion to compel failed to comply with the local rules regarding

discovery motions (see Loc. Rule 26.2(D) and could have been denied immediately, the

Court waited for Defendants’ response to see if they could provide sufficient clarification

for the Court to rule on the substance of Plaintiff’s motion. (See Doc. 43). However,

Defendants did not understand the nature of Plaintiff’s motion either. Consequently, the

Court herein DENIES Plaintiff’s motion (doc. 42) for failure to comply with Local Rule

26.2 (D), which requires that motions to compel set forth verbatim each discovery

response at issue followed by the argument in support of the motion to compel. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 10th day of January, 2006

s/ A. KORNBLUM 

ALLAN KORNBLUM

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-00140-MP-GRJ Document 51 Filed 01/10/06 Page 1 of 1
#### § 3430.301 Purpose.

The purpose of this program is to make competitive grants for fundamental and applied research, extension, and education to address food and agricultural sciences, as defined under section 1404 of the National Agricultural Research, Extension, and Teaching Policy Act of 1977 (7 U.S.C. 3103).
#### John Bizzaro et al., Plaintiffs, v Nicholas J. Meleo et al., Individually and Doing Business as Perinton Manor et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants, and Dollinger Corporation, Appellant. (And 16 Other Actions.)

(Appeal No. 16.)

Judgment unanimously reversed and motion denied. (See *Meleo v Rochester Gas & Elec. Corp.,*72 AD2d 83.) (Appeal from judgment of Monroe Supreme Court—dismiss complaints and cross claims.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp and Doerr, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C SECTION 350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Oakmont Acquisition Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Robert J. Skandalaris, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                  
|----------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2006             
|                                  
|/s/ Robert J. Skandalaris         
|Robert J. Skandalaris             
|Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

17
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

vs. Case No. 5:19cr68/TKW

JOAQUIN HERRERA

_________________________________________________________________

ACCEPTANCE OF PLEA OF GUILTY

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate

Judge, to which there have been no timely objections, and subject to this Court’s

consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11, the plea of

guilty of the Defendant, JOAQUIN HERRERA, to Counts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 of the

Indictment is hereby ACCEPTED. All parties shall appear before this Court for

sentencing as directed.

DONE and ORDERED this 8 day of September, 2020.

th

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:19-cr-00068-TKW-MJF Document 33 Filed 09/08/20 Page 1 of 1
No. 89-6602.

#### Kimberlin *v.*United States.

C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.
#### § 29.407 Disposition of import inspection certificate.

The inspector shall provide the importer with the original portion of the certificate and forward the first copy to the Director and the second copy to the appropriate Regional Office. The importer shall retain the original inspection certificate until the lot inspected has been sold, manufactured into products or exported from the United States.

[49 FR 27468, July 3, 1984]
|   | 1. |   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                         |
|--------|----|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 2. |   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

|                       | India      Globalization Capital, Inc. |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|----------------------------|----------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                       |                                   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |   |
| Date:      August 18, 2008 | By:                                    | /s/ Ram      Mukunda                                                                |   |
|                       |                                   | Ram      Mukunda                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |   |
|                       |                                   | Chief      Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |   |
State of California 

AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

EXECUTIVE ORDER R-07-013 

Public Hearing to Consider Amendments to the Statewide Portable Equipment 

Registration Program (Statewide PERP) Regulation and the Airborne Toxic Control 

Measure for diesel-fueled portable engines (Portable Engine ATCM) 

WHEREAS, on March 22, 2007, the Air Resources Board (the Board or ARB) 

conducted a public consider adoption of amendments to the Statewide Portable 

Equipment Registration Program (Statewide PERP) Regulation and the Airborne Toxic 

Control Measure for diesel-fueled portable engines (Portable Engine ATCM), as set 

forth in the Initial Statement of Reasons released to the public on February 2, 2007; 

WHEREAS, following the public hearing on March 22, 2007, the Board adopted 

Resolution 07-9 in which the Board approved amendments to sections 2451, 2452, 

2453, 2455, 2456, 2458, 2459, 2460, 2461 and 2462, title 13, California Code of 

Regulations (CCR), as set forth in Attachment A thereto, and amendments to sections 

93116, 93116.1, 93116.2 and 93116.3 and adoption of section 93116.3.1, title 17, CCR, 

as set forth in Appendix B, thereto, with the Staff’s Suggested Modifications set forth in 

Attachment C thereto; 

WHEREAS, Resolutions 07-9 directed the Executive Officer to take final action to adopt 

the regulatory amendments set forth in Attachments A, B and C to Resolution 07-9, with 

such other conforming modifications as may be appropriate, to make the modified 

regulatory language and any additional supporting documents and information available 

to the public for a period of at least 15 days, to consider such written comments as may 

be submitted during this period, and to make such modifications as may be appropriate 

in light of the comments received, or to present the regulatory amendments to the Board 

for further consideration if she determines that this is warranted; 

 

WHEREAS, on June 29, 2007, the modified regulations, reflecting the amendments 

approved by the Board and other changes made to best reflect the intent of the Board at 

the hearing, were made available for public comment for a period of 15-days, with the 

changes to the originally proposed text clearly indicated, in accordance with the 

provisions of title 1, California Code of Regulations, section 44; and 

WHEREAS, written comments were received during the 15-day comment period and 

those comments have been considered by the Executive Officer. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the recitals and findings contained in 

Resolution 07-9 are incorporated by reference herein. 
Executive Order R-07-013 -2- 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that amendments to sections 2451, 2452, 2453, 2455, 

2456, 2458, 2459, 2460, 2461 and 2462, title 13, CCR, and amendments to sections 

93116, 93116.1, 93116.2 and 93116.3 and adoption of section 93116.3.1, title 17, CCR, 

are adopted as set forth in Attachment 1 hereto. 

Executed this 31st day of July , 2007, at Sacramento, California. 

__________________________

Tom Cackette 

Acting Executive Officer 

Attachment
# PHANTOM Flying FlowchartV1.0 (Simplified Version) This flowchart is aiming at help you to get familiarwith the flying procedures of PHANTOM, please read the Manual carefully to get the operation details. Its corresponding Firmware Version is V3.0.
Switch on the transmitter, and then power on the PHANTOM.



### 8®08®08®0®®®®

IOC On 

### & 

# I _ **3~after p~r** **~** LED : Mode +GPS Satellite Number+6Yellow 

# I d.

**-.-==,......-,~** 

## ...,....,.Recor 1ngl 

### 1 LED : Blink is ok. Green Quickly 

### L



## ~ Record the - 

# J_,...--....:..---, forward direction. ___ **F_a_il_s_a~_e** __ ,..1LED: BlinkYellow Quickly 

### 000000000 Senser ErrorToo Big LED:Red+ Green+Yellow Compass ErrorToo Big-------..



# 1------~cLED:Red+Yellow )IIIIIIIIIIIIC:=IIII!IIIII[:::::J If Red LED appears in the lastfour 

## '---------<IHgreen flashes, the autopilot system cannot work.

LED : Mode +GPS Satellite Number+6Green Important: If PHANTOM is moved after power on and before 

### the motors start-up, that is normal. GPS Satellite Number:2:6 If it is stationary 

### on the ground. please 

### try the liv1U Basic Calibration.



### 888888888 ln1portant: At any 

### tnornent after pov;er on. :f t11e GPS Satellite nurnl)er is less !han 6 and last for at least 

### 1Os; even though you select the GPS /\TTl. Mode and LED blinks in tile GPSATTl. Mode, the PHJ\NTOM will work in P..TTI. Mode.



# I Home Point Recording is ok

**----~**

First Level Protection Alert 

# -c: IOC Ending

Second Level 

### 888888888 Protection Alert &Height Descent FailSafe Important: When 

### you switch to ATTL 

### Mode, the main controllerwill disengage enhanced FailSafe mode, you can re-gain control of aircraft. GPS Satellite-:-----.

Number2.6 Return to the



### HomeP~~ 

### 000000000 

## 1 GPS Satellite Nurnber:2:6, in GPS ATTl. Mode, 1 Distance between the Horne 

### Point and -..!..'t:....:...P:..:.HA;.;;,.;.NTOM>

### 1Om. (Home Lock) 

# __ ]

Green Part means normal procedures: ---•means regular situation.

**~** means selectable or possible situation. Pink Texttells the details. Red Part means possible abnormal situation. Part is possible in normal orabnormal situation, require you to confirm bythe Text for details. Blue Part is the condition ofthe normal situation. Purple Part is the condition ofthe abnormal situation.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 1:89-cr-01018-MP-GRJ-4

CLARENCE T FOX, 

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and

Recommendation dated December 11, 2012. (Doc. 1360). The parties have been furnished a

copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo

determination of any timely filed objections. 

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely

filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. 

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated

by reference in this order. 

2. The motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, Doc. 1359, is denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 18th day of April, 2013

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service

Rhinoceros and Tiger

Conservation Educational

Outreach Plan

Rhinoceroses and tigers are among the

most critically endangered large mammals

in the world, and are the focus of extensive

global conservation efforts aimed at halting

their decline. Consumer demand for the

parts and products of these species creates

illegal trade that supplies luxury markets

as well as markets for cultural and

medicinal needs. One of the most complex

and far-reaching aspects of this trade is for

use in traditional medicines.

In an effort to strengthen on-the-ground

conservation for rhinoceroses and tigers,

the United States Congress passed the

Rhinoceros and Tiger Conservation Act of

1994 (RTCA). The RTCA authorizes

establishment of the Rhinoceros and Tiger

Conservation Fund, a competitive grants

program that supports conservation

activities.

When the RTCA was amended in 1998, one

new provision called for creation of an

educational outreach plan in the United

States that would raise community

awareness of these species’ conservation

status. Specifically, the provisions identified

the need for information concerning the

laws protecting rhinoceros and tiger

species, including those that prohibit the

trade in products containing these animals,

the way in which use of traditional

medicines affects these species, the status

of wild rhinoceroses and tigers, and the

reasons for protecting them.

From these guidelines, the U.S. Fish and

Wildlife Service (Service) developed seven

goals to address this mandate:

1. National call to arms to help stop

poaching

2. Stop demand and illegal trade through

outreach

3. Inform the public about rhinoceros and

tiger conservation

4. Advise consumers of health risks of

packaged medicines

5. Work with the traditional medicine

community on alternatives to rhino and

tiger medicines

6. Stimulate and sustain stakeholder

cooperation in program

7. Assess or measure the effectiveness of

the outreach plan

Since 1998, cooperation between the

Service, non-governmental organizations

(NGOs), the traditional Chinese medicine

community, and other concerned groups

has resulted in positive steps to inform the

public about the plight of rhinoceroses and

tigers. The survival of these species is the

mutual concern of all people in the United

States, as demonstrated by the willingness

of NGOs and others to combine resources

for the conservation of these animals.

For more information about rhinoceros and

tiger species and how their populations can

be protected, contact the Division of

Management Authority at the address or

phone below, or e-mail

traditionalmedicines@fws.gov.

U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service

International Affairs

Division of Management Authority

4401 N. Fairfax Drive, Room 700

Arlington, VA 22203

703-358-2104

e-mail: traditionalmedicines@fws.gov

http://www.fws.gov

http://international.fws.gov

Fall 2002
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. LEONEL RIVER

A, a .k.a . Le ona l R ive ra , a .k.a . R u be n Soliz , De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 15-10373

D.C . No. 2:97-c r-00040-W B S M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Ea ste rn Distric t of C a lifornia W illia m B . Shubb, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

June 14, 2016 ** B e fore : B EA, WATFORD, a nd FRIEDLAND, C irc uit Judge s. Le one l R i ve ra

a ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s orde r de ny ing his mo tion for a se n te nc e re duc tion unde r 18 U.S.C . § 3582(c )(2). W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a

nd we a ffirm . 

# FIL ED JUN 22 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).R ive ra c onte nds tha t he is e ntitle d to a se nte nc e re d uc t ion unde r Am e ndm e nt 782 to theSe n te nc ing Guide line s. R e vie wing de novo, se e Unite d State s v . W e s son , 583 F.3d 728, 730 (9th C ir. 2009), we a gre e with thedistric t c o urt tha t be c a use R ive ra

wa s se nte n c e d a s a

c are e r offe nde r, it la c ke d a uthority to re duc e his se nte nc e . S

e e id. at 731-32. R ive ra c onte nds, howe ve r, tha t ha d the distric t c ourt prope rly a pplie d Appre ndi v . N

e w J e rse y , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), a t his original se nte n c ing he aring, it would ha ve be e n re q

uire d to usethe ba se offe nse le ve l sta te d in U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1, rathe r tha n U.S.S.G. § 4B 1.1, the re by e ntitling him

to the be ne fit of the c ha

nge s to se c t ion 2D1.1, de spite his c are e r offe nde r status. Eve n a c c e pting a ll of this a s true , R ive ra c annot pre va il. Am e ndm e nt 782 m a de no c ha n ge s to the ba se offe n se le ve l unde r se c tion 2D1.1 for the drug qua ntity involve d in Ri ve ra ’ s offe nse . Se e U.S.S.G. 2D1.1(c )(3) (2015). R ive ra ’ s c la im de pe nds e ntire ly

on the a lle ge d Appre ndi viola tion, whic h c annot be ra i se d in a 3582(c )(2) proc e e ding. Se eDillon v . Unite d State s , 560 U.S. 817, 831 (2010) (e rrors tha t oc c urre d at the origina l se nte nc ing a

re “ outsidethe sc ope of the proc e e ding a uthoriz e d by § 3582(c )(2)” ). AFFIRM E D.

1 5 - 1 0 3 7 3 2
#### § 352.15 Caution.

In applying safeguards or taking other measures prescribed under the provisions in this part, it should be understood that inexactness or carelessness may result in injury or damage. It should also be understood by the owners that emergency measures prescribed by the inspector to safeguard against plant pest, noxious weed, or biological control organism dissemination may have adverse effects on certain products and articles and that they will take the calculated risk of such adverse effects of authorized measures.

[25 FR 1929, Mar. 5, 1960, as amended at 75 FR 68952, Nov. 10, 2010; 84 FR 29967, June 25, 2019]
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:92cr4013-WS

MICHAEL MORGAN,

Defendant.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc.

2065) docketed May 24, 2013. The magistrate judge recommends that the defendant's

motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence (docs. 1991 & 2064) be summarily

dismissed. The defendant has filed no objections to the report and recommendation.

Upon review of the record, this court has determined that the magistrate judge’s

report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 2065) is hereby

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order.

2. The government's motion to dismiss (doc. 1997) is GRANTED.
Page 2 of 2

3. The defendant's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence (docs. 1991

& 2064) is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

4. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: "All claims are DISMISSED."

5. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 27th day of June , 2013.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No. 4:92cr4013-WS