alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.35
                                                                   -------------


                     Summary Description of L.A. Gear, Inc.
                      Management Incentive Program ("MIP")



The Company provides cash and deferred bonus opportunities to its officers and
other selected management personnel through its Management Incentive Program
("MIP").  Bonus awards are based primarily on improvements in Economic Value
Added ("EVA"), although the plan provides that a portion of an individual's
target bonus may be excluded from the bonus calculation based on EVA improvement
and be allocated to bonus awards based on individual performance objectives.
EVA is a measure of economic profit and equity-related capital.  The bonus plan
is based on three key concepts:  a target bonus, a fixed share of EVA
improvement in excess of expected EVA improvement ("excess EVA improvement") and
a bonus bank.  The EVA bonus earned is equal to the sum of the target bonus plus
the fixed share of excess EVA improvement (which may be negative).  The bonus
earned is credited to the bonus bank, and the bonus paid is equal to the amount
of the bonus bank balance, up to the amount of the target bonus, plus 1/3 of the
bonus bank balance in excess of the target bonus.  No bonus is paid when the
bonus bank is negative (or when the Company has a net operating loss after tax),
and negative bonus bank balances are carried forward to offset future bonuses
earned.  There is no cap on the bonus awards that can be achieved for superior
levels of excess EVA improvement.  Target bonuses are based on a percentage of a
participant's annualized base salary as of the beginning of the fiscal year,
with percentages ranging from 30-50% in the case of senior officers and vice
presidents and 20-30% for other participants.  The Compensation Committee
administers the MIP.
§ 3201.53 Expanded polystyrene (EPS) foam recycling products. ( a ) *Definition.* Products formulated to dissolve EPS foam to reduce the volume of recycled or discarded EPS items.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 90 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than October 18, 2011, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased EPS foam recycling products. By that date, Federal agencies that have the responsibility for drafting or reviewing specifications for items to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased EPS foam recycling products.
[75 FR 63701, Oct. 18, 2010]
t/jCli&i^^ OFFIC E OF THE IVIAYOR 

Ummm $ CIT Y OF HOUSTO N -"pi OF I'- :SP0BTAI10' 

•i!^'.^' * TEXA S 

ANNISE D. PARKER ', ", ,: \j \ 

MAYOR 

February 18, 2010 

ACTIO N 

S 

CONTROL NO. 

The Honorable Ray LaHood S10-100308-053 

Secretary 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, D.C. 

20590 

Subject: Haneda Combination Services Allocation Proceeding DOT-OST-2010-0018 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

I support the Continental Airlines application to provide daily nonstop service between 

New York/Newark and Tokyo Haneda airport and connecting service between the 

Houston region that I represent and Tokyo Haneda via an easy connection through 

Continental's Newark Liberty hub. New air service to Haneda, which is scheduled to 

begin later this year, is made possible by the wide ranging open skies agreement with 

Japan achieved by your Department. I applaud your efforts on the historic open skies 

agreement and now urge you to select Continental to provide service that will connect 

other points across the central U.S. with Tokyo's downtown airport, Haneda. 

Continental's worldwide headquarters is located in Houston and the airline directly 

employs over 17,000 people in the state making the company a key component of the 

Texas economy. I support Continental's efforts to grow its network from all of its key hub 

locations as I understand that what is good for Continental is good for the Houston 

region. Additionally, given the amount of service between key Texas cities like Houston 

and Newark Liberty, making a connection to new Tokyo Haneda service is easy to do. 

Finally, Continental's proposal to serve Haneda opens the door for travelers and 

shippers in my community to choose between nonstop Tokyo Narita service from 

Houston and Newark and nonstop Tokyo Haneda service from Newark. 

Continental Airlines is committed to the Asian region and to nonstop Tokyo Haneda 

service. The economies of many U.S. communities, millions of Americans , the airline's 

thousands of employees and hundreds of thousands of U.S. consumers will benefit from 

Continental's proposed service and will work together to make new Tokyo Haneda 

service a real success. 

I urge you to award Tokyo Haneda rights to Continental Airlines and to my community. 

Sincerely, 

V>V->toHMi_J5auA^^e-, 

Annise D. Parker 

Mayor 

POS T OFFIC E BO X 1562 • HOUSTON , TEXA S 7725 1
V 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2406 

For the relief of Daniel Wachira. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 17, 2013 

Mr. RANGEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Daniel Wachira. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR DANIEL 

4 WACHIRA. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Daniel Wachira shall be eligible for issuance of an 

8 immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an 

9 alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon fil10 ing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 

11 section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to 

12 lawful permanent resident. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2406 IH 

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Daniel Wachira 

2 enters the United States before the filing deadline speci3 fied in subsection (c), he shall be considered to have en4 tered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, 

5 be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of 

6 the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 

7 enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Daniel Wachira, the Secretary of State shall in16 struct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the current 

17 or next following fiscal year, the total number of immi18 grant visas that are made available to natives of the coun19 try of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the Immi20 gration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total 

21 number of immigrant visas that are made available to na22 tives of the country of the alien’s birth under section 

23 202(e) of such Act. 

24 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

25 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 2406 IH 

1 parents, brothers, and sisters of Daniel Wachira shall not, 

2 by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, privi3 lege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Jerome Novick, Appellant, v. Gloria Novick, Respondent.

Order entered August 26, 1966, resettling judgment, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs and without disbursements, and motion denied. The purported resettlement effects a major change in the original judgment entered on consent. It was not shown that the change sought was necessitated by an inadvertence or mistake in the terms of the original judgment. Under these circumstances, the attempted change by way of resettlement is impermissible *(Ruland*v. *Tuthill,*187 App. Div. 314). Concur—Stevens, J. P., Steuer, Capozzoli and Rabin, JJ.
Case 3:98-cv-00434-RV-SMN Document 231 Filed 04/20/00 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:98-cv-00434-RV-SMN Document 231 Filed 04/20/00 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Each
      of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Sino
      Gas
      International Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1)
       The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the fiscal period
      ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
      August 14, 2008





/s/
                Yuchuan LiuYuchuan
                LiuChief
                Executive Officer/s/
                Yong ZhangYong
                ZhangChief
                Financial Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 35.7 Certificate.

*Certificate* or *Certificate of Inspection* means any of the official forms of inspection certificate, bearing the statement “meets Export Grape and Plum Act,” issued by the Federal or Federal-State Inspection Service in accordance with regulations governing the inspection of fresh fruits, vegetables, and other products (7 CFR part 51).

[26 FR 8934, Sept. 22, 1961, as amended at 85 FR 7444, Feb. 10, 2020]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk March 4, 2013

s0225 

# Order

March 4, 2013

145879

35160 JEFFERSON AVENUE, L.L.C.,

Plaintiff/Counter

Defendant

- Appellant,

v SC: 145879

COA: 303152

Macomb CC: 2010

- 000420

- CH

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF HARRISON and

BOARD OF MACOMB COUNTY ROAD

COMMISSIONERS,

Defendants,

and

IVAN DOVERSPIKE and KIMBERLY F.

DOVERSPIKE,

Defendants/Counter

Plaintiffs

- Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 7, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questi ons presented should be reviewed by this Court.

V IVIANO

, J., not participating.
§ 2500.041 Payment. ( a ) *General.* All payments will be made in advance unless a deviation is accepted or as specified in paragraph (b) of this section. All payments to the awardee shall be made via the approved electronic funds transfer (EFT) method. Awardees are expected to request funds via the federally-approved electronic payment system for reimbursement in a timely manner. Exact payment method will be described in the terms and conditions of the award agreement.
( b ) *Reimbursement method.* OAO shall use the reimbursement method if it determines that advance payment is not feasible or that the awardee does not maintain or demonstrate the willingness to maintain written procedures that minimize the elapse of time between the transfer of funds and disbursement by the awardee, and financial management systems that meet the standards for fund control and accountability.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2301 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to enhance the clinical trial registry 

data bank reporting requirements and enforcement measures. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 6, 2013 

Mr. REED (for himself, Ms. SLAUGHTER, and Mr. COLLINS of New York) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to enhance the 

clinical trial registry data bank reporting requirements 

and enforcement measures. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Clinical Trial Cancer 

5 Mission 2020 Act’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 2301 IH

1 SEC. 2. ENHANCING CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY DATA BANK 

2 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS AND ENFORCE3 MENT MEASURES. 

4 (a) CLARIFICATION THAT CLINICAL TRIAL REG5 ISTRY DATA BANK REQUIREMENTS APPLY REGARDLESS

6 OF TRIAL OUTCOMES.—Section 402(j)(1)(A)(i) of the 

7 Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 282(j)(1)(A)(i)) is 

8 amended by inserting before the period at the end the fol9 lowing ‘‘, whether or not such a clinical trial results in 

10 a positive or negative outcome’’. 

11 (b) APPLICATION TO GRANTS FROM DEPARTMENT

12 OF DEFENSE.—Section 402(j)(5)(A)(i) of such Act (42 

13 U.S.C. 282(j)(5)(A)(i)) is amended by inserting ‘‘the De14 partment of Defense or’’ after ‘‘agency of’’. 

15 (c) ENHANCED ENFORCEMENT.—Section 

16 402(j)(5)(A) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 282(j)(5)(A)) is 

17 amended by adding at the end the following new clause: 

18 ‘‘(v) ENHANCED ENFORCEMENT.— 

19 After the 30-day period described in clause 

20 (iii), if the head of an agency referred to 

21 in clause (i), as applicable, verifies that a 

22 grantee has not submitted clinical trial in23 formation as described in clause (ii), with 

24 respect to an applicable clinical trial that is 

25 funded in whole or in part by a grant from 

26 the agency, such grantee— 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•HR 2301 IH

1 ‘‘(I) shall not be eligible to re2 ceive any remaining funding for the 

3 grant or funding for a future Federal 

4 grant until such time as the grantee 

5 comes into compliance with all appli6 cable reporting requirements under 

7 this subsection; and 

8 ‘‘(II) shall be liable to the United 

9 States for repayment of any amount 

10 provided under the grant for the clin11 ical trial for which the grantee failed 

12 to comply with such reporting require13 ments.’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
###### Editorial Note on Part 3405

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3405 appear at 76 FR 4808, Jan. 27, 2011.

#### § 3405.5 Matching funds.

Each application must provide for matching support from a non-Federal source. NIFA will cite in the program announcement the required percentage of institutional cost sharing.
#### § 3555.109 Qualified mortgage.

A qualified mortgage is a guaranteed loan meeting the requirements of this part and applicable Agency guidance, as well as the requirements in 12 CFR 1026.43(e)(2)(i) through (iii) and 12 CFR 1026.43(e)(3). An extension of credit made pursuant to a program administered by a State Housing Finance Agency is exempt from this requirement as defined in 12 CFR 1026.43(a)(3)(iv). Lenders will be allowed to cure unintentional errors and retain the qualified mortgage status if the conditions set in 12 CFR 1026.31(h) are met.

[81 FR 26464, May 3, 2016]
§ 3550.157 Payment subsidy. ( a ) *Borrowers currently receiving payment subsidy.* ( 1 ) RHS will review annually each borrower's eligibility for continued payment subsidy and determine the appropriate level of assistance. To be eligible for payment subsidy renewal, the borrower must also occupy the property.
( 2 ) If the renewal is not completed before the expiration date of the existing agreement, the effective date of the renewal will be either the expiration date of the previous agreement if RHS error caused the delay, or the next due date after the renewal is approved in all other cases.
( 3 ) The borrower must notify RHS whenever an adult member of the household becomes employed or changes employment, there is a change in household composition, or if income increases by at least 10 percent. The household may also report decreases in income. If the change in the household's income will cause the payment for principal and interest to change by at least 10 percent, the household's payment subsidy may be adjusted for a new 12-month period. The new agreement will be effective the due date following the date the borrower's information is verified by RHS.
( b ) *Borrowers not currently receiving payment subsidy.* Payment assistance may be granted to borrowers not currently receiving payment subsidy whose loans were approved on or after August 1, 1968, whose income does not exceed the applicable low-income limit for the area, are personally occupying the RHS financed property, and who meet the requirements of § 3550.53(b), (e), and (f). In general, to receive payment assistance the term of the loan at closing must have been at least 25 years. If an account has been reamortized and the initial term of the loan was at least 25 years, payment assistance may be granted even though the term of the reamortized loan is less than 25 years. Payment assistance may be granted on a subsequent loan for repairs with a term of less than 25 years.
( c ) *Cancellation of payment subsidy.* RHS will cancel a payment subsidy if the borrower does not occupy the property, has sold or transferred title to the property, or is no longer eligible for payment subsidy.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lightwave Logic, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Andrew Ashton, Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: August 14, 2008





/s/ Andrew J. Ashton

Andrew Ashton, Treasurer

Lightwave Logic, Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>        5
<LEGEND>         THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
                 INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM  THE  REGISTRANT'S
                 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR ITS  YEAR  ENDED
                 DECEMBER  31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
                 BY  REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               Dec-31-1996
<CASH>                                          11,361
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,920
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,897
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,475
<PP&E>                                         134,831
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 173,624
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,984
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            64
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (30,577)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   173,624
<SALES>                                         39,916
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,916
<CGS>                                           21,987
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,987
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,736
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,681
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,512
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (268)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,780
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,643
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,423
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.99


</TABLE>
# L_2020303EN.01002301.xml

| 17.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 303/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 303/23

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1247 of 2 September 2020 operating deductions from fishing quotas available for certain stocks in 2020 on account of overfishing in the previous years

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 288 of 3 September 2020
  )

On page 23, in the table of the Annex:

for:

| ‘DK | POK | 1N2AB. | Saithe | Norwegian waters of 1 and 2 | / | 17 000 | 50 968 | 299,81 % | 50 968 | 1,00 | / | / | 50 968’ |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |

‘DK

POK

1N2AB.

Saithe

Norwegian waters of 1 and 2

/

17 000

50 968

299,81 %

50 968

1,00

/

/

50 968’

read:

| ‘DK | POK | 1N2AB. | Saithe | Norwegian waters of 1 and 2 | / | 17 000 | 50 968 | 299,81 % | 33 968 | 1,00 | / | / | 33 968’ |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |

‘DK

POK

1N2AB.

Saithe

Norwegian waters of 1 and 2

/

17 000

50 968

299,81 %

33 968

1,00

/

/

33 968’

Page 25, table of the Annex:

for:

| “PT | BUM | ATLANT | Blue marlin | Atlantic Ocean | 50 440 | 7 076 | 18 016 | 254,61 % | 10 940 | 1,00 | A | / | 10 940” |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |

“PT

BUM

ATLANT

Blue marlin

Atlantic Ocean

50 440

7 076

18 016

254,61 %

10 940

1,00

A

/

10 940”

read:

| “PT | BUM | ATLANT | Blue marlin | Atlantic Ocean | 50 440 | 7 076 | 18 016 | 254,61 % | 10 940 | 1,00 | A | / | 16 410” |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |

“PT

BUM

ATLANT

Blue marlin

Atlantic Ocean

50 440

7 076

18 016

254,61 %

10 940

1,00

A

/

16 410”

---