alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SERVED JANUARY 12,2012 

JEFARTMENT OF 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIOr^ANSPORl/^TjON 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS ^^'^^^ OPERAllONS 

WASHINGTON, DC .^,^,.^.,3 ^ ^_ , ^ 

In The Matter Of: ) 

) DOCKET NO. FAA-2010-0192 

CLOUD DANCER AVIATION ) 

AND FLYING CLUB, INC., ) (Civil Penalty Proceeding) 

) 

Respondent ) (CP lOSOOOOl) 

ORDER DISMISSING PROCEEDING 

On January 11, 2012 the Complainant, the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) filed a Withdrawal of Complaint with the Office of Mcarings. This Withdrawal ol 

Complaint stated that the parties had reached a settlement and that the FAA was 

withdrawing its February 12, 2010 Notice of Complaint, which was amended on April 

16,2010. 

It Is Hereby Ordered: 

1) The Hearing set to begin on January 31, 2012 at 9:00am EST in Orlando, 

Florida, is cancelled. 

2) Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §13.215, this proceeding is dismissed with prejudice. 

^an 

frative Law Judge 

Attachment: Service List 
FAA DOCKET NO. CPlOSOOOOl 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Indeptjndence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Dennis R. Haber, Respondent's Counsel 

Dennis R. Haber, P.A. 

8925 S.W. 148 Street, Suite 200 

Miami, FL 33176 

"TEL: 305-256-3002 

FAX: 305-256-3004 

Andrea Michelle Harper, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, ASO-7 

Southern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 20636 

Atlanta, Georgia 30320 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

The Honorable J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.'" " 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Avialion Adrninistration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Anention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
98-666.

#### Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Fuqua.

On April 7, 1998, movant, Cincinnati Bar Association, filed with this court a motion for an order to show cause why respondent should not be punished for contempt for failure or refusal, without just cause or just excuse, to obey the commands of the court to appear in response to the subpoena *duces tecum*issued by the Board of Commissioners on the Unauthorized Practice of Law and to produce the documents the production of which was ordered by the subpoena *duces tecum.*On April 17, 1998, respondent filed a response to the motion. On May 27, 1998, this court granted the motion to the extent that respondent was ordered to show cause in writing within twenty days of the date of the order why he should not be punished for contempt. On June 16,1998, respondent filed a response to the show cause order, a motion to quash subpoena *duces tecum,*and a request for oral argument. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by this court, *sua sponte,*that movant, Cincinnati Bar Association, be and, is hereby, ordered to show cause by filing a written response with the Clerk of this court on or before twenty days from the date of this order why this case should not be dismissed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, *sua sponte,*that all documents filed with this court in this case shall meet the filing requirements set forth in the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio, including requirements as to form, number, and timeliness of filings.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Southern National Bancorp of Virginia, Inc. (SNBV) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial officer of SNBV hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that based on their knowledge and
belief: 1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of SNBV as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



|                                           
|-------------------------------------------
|/s/ Georgia S. Derrico                     
|Georgia S. Derrico, Chief Executive Officer
|                                           
|/s/ William H. Lagos                       
|William H. Lagos, Chief Financial Officer  
|                                           
|May 14, 2009
| **Golden Spike****Cultural Landscape Report**
**Cultural Landscape Report:Golden Spike National Historic SiteBox Elder County, Utah**

**ByCarla Homstad, Janene Caywood, and Peggy Nelson**

No. 162000

**CULTURAL RESOURCES SELECTIONS**Intermountain RegionNational Park Service

**TABLE OF CONTENTS**
gosp/clr/clr.htmLast Updated: 27-Jul-2003 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 10.5(c)


 


SITEL
Corporation


FREEZING
OF EXECUTIVE WEALTH ACCUMULATION PLAN


 


SITEL Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, hereby
terminates all contributions to the SITEL Corporation Executive Wealth
Accumulation Plan (the “Plan”), on and after December 31, 2004.
Notwithstanding the termination of contributions to the Plan, the current
Deferred Benefit Accounts of all Participants shall continue to be held and
administered in accordance with the Plan. Capitalized terms used in this
document shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Plan.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this document is executed on
behalf of SITEL Corporation this 10th day of December, 2004.


 


 


	
   

  	
  SITEL
  CORPORATION

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/ James F.
  Lynch

  	
   

  	 

	
   

  	
   

  	
  James F. Lynch,
  CEO
#### § 30.4 Stemmed.

A form of leaf tobacco consisting of a collection of leaves from which the stems or midribs have been removed, including strip scrap.
EXHIBIT 32

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BlackRock Kelso Capital
Corporation (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), James R. Maher, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Frank D.
Gordon, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                              
|------------------------------
|                              
|/s/ James R. Maher            
|Name: James R. Maher          
|Title: Chief Executive Officer
|Date: August 8, 2008          
|                              
|/s/ Frank D. Gordon           
|Name: Frank D. Gordon         
|Title: Chief Financial Officer
|Date: August 8, 2008
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Rose R. Bohmann, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[815 NYS2d 344]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 22, 2005, which ruled that claimant was *1251disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

From October 2003 until May 2004, claimant was employed as the head teacher of a class of four-year-olds at a day-care center. She was discharged from her employment following an incident in which a parent complained of an unreported injury to her child while in claimant’s care. Claimant’s application for unemployment insurance benefits was subsequently denied on the ground that she was terminated due to misconduct. She now appeals.

We affirm. An employee’s actions which have a detrimental effect upon an employer’s interests and are contrary to established policies have been found to constitute disqualifying misconduct *(see Matter of Knight [Commissioner of Labor],*300 AD2d 727, 727 [2002]). Here, the employer’s representative testified that she received a complaint from the mother of a child who had suffered a cut lip and who related that he had slipped off a table while in a room supervised by claimant. The representative stated that claimant, who had been previously warned about safety issues concerning her supervision, acknowledged that the child may have fallen off a snack table, but did not offer an explanation for not checking him over. She stated that the procedure that claimant should have followed was to examine the child and then fill out an accident report. Although claimant testified that she did not observe any injuries on the child after he fell and denied that he was injured while he was under her supervision, this presented a credibility issue for the Board to resolve *(see Matter of Wright [Commissioner of Labor],*249 AD2d 668, 669 [1998]). Under the circumstances presented, we find that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision *(see Matter of Johnson [Wayandanch Day Care Ctr.—Commissioner of Labor],*257 AD2d 823 [1999]).

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Peters, Spain and Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
Hogan Lovells US LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in the District of Columbia. “Hogan Lovells” is an international legal practice that includes Hogan Lovells US

LLP and Hogan Lovells International LLP, with offices in: Alicante Amsterdam Baltimore Beijing Brussels Caracas Colorado Springs Denver Dubai Dusseldorf

Frankfurt Hamburg Hanoi Ho Chi Minh City Hong Kong Houston Johannesburg London Los Angeles Luxembourg Madrid Miami Milan Moscow Munich New

York Northern Virginia Paris Philadelphia Prague Rio de Janeiro Rome San Francisco São Paulo Shanghai Silicon Valley Singapore Tokyo Ulaanbaatar

Warsaw Washington DC Associated offices: Budapest Jakarta Jeddah Riyadh Zagreb. For more information see www.hoganlovells.com

\\DC - 040601/000003 - 5560910 v1

Hogan Lovells US LLP

Columbia Square

555 Thirteenth Street, NW

Washington, DC 20004

T +1 202 637 5600

F +1 202 637 5910

www.hoganlovells.com

April 4, 2014

By Electronic Mail and Electronic Submission

Paul L. Gretch

Director

Office of International Aviation

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Statement of Authorization for Republic Airline Inc. to Display the "LH" Designator

Code of Deutsche Lufthansa AG on Flights it Operates as US Airways Express

(Dockets DOT-OST-2003-15946 and DOT-OST-2011-0004)

Dear Mr. Gretch:

By letter dated March 18, 2014, filed in Docket DOT-OST-2003-15946, US Airways, Inc.

(“US Airways”) notified the Department that code-sharing with Deutsche Lufthansa AG (“Lufthansa”)

would be terminated effective March 30, 2014. Pursuant to condition (c) of Department Action on

Application in Docket DOT-OST-2011-0004, dated February 8, 2011, Republic Airline Inc.

(“Republic”) hereby confirms that Lufthansa’s “LH” designator code will likewise no longer be

displayed on flights operated by Republic as US Airways Express.

Respectfully submitted,

Robert E. Cohn

Patrick R. Rizzi

Counsel for Republic Airline Inc.

robert.cohn@hoganlovells.com

patrick.rizzi@hoganlovells.com

D +1.202.637.4999/5659

cc: Docket DOT-OST-2003-15946

Docket DOT-OST-2011-0004

Ethan J. Blank, Vice President, General Counsel, Republic Airways Holdings Inc.

Esta Rosenberg, Chief, U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division

Arthur J. Molins, Counsel for Lufthansa

Howard Kass, Vice President-Regulatory Affairs, US Airways
#### § 322.27 Eligible ports for transit shipments.

You may transit restricted organisms only through a port of entry staffed by an APHIS inspector.[7]

###### Footnotes -
  322.27

[7] To find out if a specific port is staffed by an APHIS inspector, or for a list of ports staffed by APHIS inspectors, contact Permit Unit, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 133, Riverdale, MD 20737-1236; toll-free (877) 770-5990; fax (301) 734-8700.
§ 3201.78 Blast media. ( a ) *Definition.* Abrasive particles sprayed forcefully to clean, remove contaminants, or condition surfaces, often preceding coating.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The Federal preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 94 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than April 4, 2013, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased blast media. By that date, Federal agencies that have the responsibility for drafting or reviewing specifications for products to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased blast media.
( d ) *Determining overlap with an EPA-designated recovered content product.* Qualifying products within this item may overlap with the EPA-designated recovered content product: Miscellaneous products—blasting grit. USDA is requesting that manufacturers of these qualifying biobased products provide information on the USDA Web site of qualifying biobased products about the intended uses of the product, information on whether or not the product contains any recovered material, in addition to biobased ingredients, and performance standards against which the product has been tested. This information will assist Federal agencies in determining whether or not a qualifying biobased product overlaps with EPA-designated blasting grit products and which product should be afforded the preference in purchasing.
Note to paragraph ( d
):
Biobased blast media within this designated product category can compete with similar blasting grit products with recycled content. Under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, section 6002, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency designated blasting grit products containing recovered materials as products for which Federal agencies must give preference in their purchasing programs. The designation can be found in the Comprehensive Procurement Guideline, 40 CFR 247.17.
[77 FR 20289, Apr. 4, 2012]
§ 1900.155 Designating the processing/servicing official. ( a ) *Designating an official with equivalent authority.* The State Director (or Administrator, under § 1900.253(e) of this subpart or this paragraph) designates a nonrelated or nonassociated Rural Development official authorized to conduct the activity under program regulations, established delegation of authority and approval authority under subpart A of part 1901 of this chapter, and whose duty station is most convenient to the recipient and to the security property. A type and/or amount of assistance processed or serviced by a County Supervisor or at a County Office should be assigned only to another County Supervisor or County Office. A type and/or amount of assistance processed or serviced by a District Director or at a District Office should be assigned only to another District Director or District Office.
( b ) *County Committee.* For processing or servicing decisions to be made by a County Committee, if the recipient is a member, a different County Committee is designated. If the recipient is related to or associated with the member, notwithstanding the provisions of § 1900.151(a)(3) of this subpart, the State Director *may* permit the decision to be made by the local committee, if the related/associated member abstains.
( c ) [Reserved]
[58 FR 224, Jan. 5, 1993, as amended at 80 FR 9868, Feb. 24, 2015]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael J. Wagner, Chief Executive Officer of BabyUniverse in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) BabyUniverses Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 3, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of BabyUniverse.

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of
the 18th day of December 2007.



/s/ Michael J. WagnerMichael J. WagnerChief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Robert E. Swanson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ridgewood Energy P
Fund, LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Dated:  November 21, 2006

   /s/  ROBERT E. SWANSON
 Name:  Robert E. Swanson

Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer
        (Principal Executive Officer)
2006-0503.

#### In re Foster.

Cuyahoga App. No. 85716, 2006-Ohio-88. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issues stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed February 10, 2006:

1. “Whether a reasonable efforts determination is required in motions for permanent custody filed pursuant to R.C. 2151.413?”

2. ‘Whether a trial court abuses its discretion by denying a request for an in camera interview in a permanent custody determination when there is nothing in the record to indicate that having the children testify would have been detrimental to them or that they did not desire to testify?”

Moyer, C.J., would certify a conflict as to the first issue only.

O’Donnell, J., dissents.

As to the first issue, the conflict cases are: *In re Stevens*(July 16, 1993), Montgomery App. No. 13523; *In re Lawson/Reid Children*(Apr. 18, 1997), Clark App. No. 96-CA-0010; *In re Cook,*Seneca App. No. 13-02-29, 2003-Ohio-868; *In re Efaw*(Apr. 21, 1998), Athens App. No. 97CA49; *In re Leitwein,*Hocking App. No. 03CA18, 2004-Ohio-1296; *In re Guisinger*(May 31, 1994), Stark App. No. CA-9478; *In re Elliot,*Jefferson App. Nos. 03JE30 and 03JE33, 2004-Ohio-388; *In re C.W.,*Summit App. No. 22820, 2005-Ohio-6739; *In re Moore*(Dec. 15, 1999), Summit App. No. 19217; *In re S.S.,*Franklin App. No. 05AP-204, 2005-Ohio-4282; *In re S.P.,*Butler App. No. CA2004-10-255, 2005-Ohio-1079; *In re A.C.,*Clermont App. No. CA2004-05-041, 2004-Ohio-5531; and *In re T.T.,*Butler App. Nos. CA2004-07-175 and CA2004-08-198, 2005-Ohio-240.

As to the second issue, the conflict cases are: *In re Beresh Children,*Stark App. No. 2003CA00089, 2003-Ohio-4898; *In re Sunderman/Daniels Minor Children,*Stark App. No. 2004CA00093, 2004-Ohio-*14544608; *In re D.M.,*Summit App. Nos. 22732 and 22749, 2005-Ohio-6740; and *In re Funk,*Portage App. Nos. 2002-P-0035 and 2002-P-0036, 2002-Ohio-4958.
2005-2162.

#### Bellman v. Am. Internatl. Group.

Lucas App. No. L-03-1301. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Lucas County. Upon consideration of the motions to withdraw of appellees Universal Underwriters Insurance Company and American Family Insurance Company,

*1412IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motions are granted.

Resnick, J., dissents.