alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 319.77-2 Regulated articles. In order to prevent the spread of gypsy moth from Canada into noninfested areas of the United States, the gypsy moth host materials listed in paragraphs (a) through (e) of this section are designated as regulated articles. Regulated articles may be imported into the United States from Canada only under the conditions described in § 319.77-4 of this subpart. ( a ) Trees without roots (e.g., Christmas trees), unless they were greenhouse-grown throughout the year;
( b ) Logs with bark attached;
( c ) Pulpwood with bark attached;
( d ) Bark and bark products;
( e ) Outdoor household articles;
( f ) Mobile homes and their associated equipment; and
( g ) Stone and quarry products.
[64 FR 45866, Aug. 23, 1999, as amended at 71 FR 40878, July 19, 2006; 83 FR 11866, Mar. 19, 2018; 84 FR 29958, June 25, 2019]
(4910-13-Pj

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14CFR Part 39 P.Oto- 0151

# z:> [Docket No. FAA-~-'~"''' 11 11; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-196-AD] RIN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model CL-600-2CIO (Regional Jet Series 700, 701 & 702), Model CL-600-2DI5 (Regional Jet Series 705), and Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice ofproposed rulemaking (NPRM). SUMMARY: Wepropose to adopt anew airworthiness directive (AD) for the product listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl) originated by an aviation authority ofanother country to identify and correct anunsafe condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsa~ condition as: Several cases have been reported ofcracks in thejoint extrusions securing the outer bondrnent tothe acoustic panel ofthe nacelle transcowl assemblies. Although there isno effect on flight safety (thrust reverser stowed), thrust reverser deployment under rejected take-off or emergency landing load conditions could potentially result inacoustic panel failure andpossible runway debris. '[)NC\) CES Dl)TING SYMBOL 

# 4JJ",-1

[NITTA •••

·''''', 

### ('~ m 

# '!./o'/1"

* * * 

### * 

## * * * The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the unsafe conditi described inthe MeAl.CONn RREIlCES 

### 14910-13-P) ROl,Il'm;~nnlOl.

ANE-171 DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14CFR Part 39 (Docket No. FAA-2009-*****; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-196-AD) RlN 2120-AA64 Ainvorthiness Directives; Bombardier ModeJCL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701 &702), Model CL-600-2Dl5 (Regional Jet Series 705), and Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). SUl\1MARY: Wepropose to adopt anew airworthiness directive (AD) fortheproducts listed above. This proposed ADresults frommandatory continuing airworthiness infomlation (MeAl) originated byanaviation authority ofanother country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as: Several cases have been reported of cracks in thejoint extrusions securing the outer bondment to the acoustic panel ofthe nacelle tmnscowl assemblies. Although there is no effect on flight safety (thrust reverser stowed), thrust reverser deployment under rejected take-off or emergency landing load conditions could potentially result in acoustic panel failure and possible runway debris. ANE-171

"Al~ 

# {,/"I,'

'NIT'A'.5IMO

~(IU'l"NC~V"'"J1.

DATf.



# • • • • • • 

# • ""T1I\l.5IS>C

DATE The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the unsafe condition described inthe MeAl.
§ 301.86-2 Regulated articles. The following are regulated articles: ( a ) Pale cyst nematodes.[1]
( b ) The following pale cyst nematode host crops: Eggplant (*Solanum melongena* L.) Pepper (*Capsicum* spp.) Potato (*Solanum tuberosum* L.) Tomatillo (*Physalis philadelphica*) Tomato (*Lycopersicon esculentum* L.)
( c ) Root crops.
( d ) Garden and dry beans (*Phaseolus* spp.) and peas (*Pisum* spp.).
( e ) All nursery stock.
( f ) Soil, compost, humus, muck, peat, and manure, and products on or in which soil is commonly found, including grass sod and plant litter.
( g ) Hay, straw, and fodder.
( h ) Any equipment or conveyance used in an infested or associated field that can carry soil if moved out of the field.
( i ) Any other product, article, or means of conveyance not listed in paragraphs (a) through (h) of this section that an inspector determines presents a risk of spreading the pale cyst nematode, after the inspector provides written notification to the person in possession of the product, article, or means of conveyance that it is subject to the restrictions of this subpart.
[72 FR 51984, Sept. 12, 2007, as amended at 74 FR 19381, Apr. 29, 2009; 87 FR 80015, Dec. 29, 2022] Footnotes -
301.86-2
[1] Permit and other requirements for the interstate movement of pale cyst nematodes are contained in part 330 of this chapter.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. 4:90cr4051–WS/GRJ

NATHANIEL JAMES,

Defendant.

 

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.§ 2255(f)(4) 

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc.

783) docketed February 15, 2018. The magistrate judge recommends that

Defendant's motion (docs. 780 & 782) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f)(4) be

summarily denied. Defendant has filed objections (doc. 784) to the report and

recommendation.

Having reviewed magistrate judge’s report and recommendation in light of

Defendant’s objections, the court has determined that the report and

recommendation is due to be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 783) is
Page 2 of 2

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order.

2. Defendant’s motion (docs. 780 & 782) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f)(4)

is DENIED.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 28th day of March , 2018.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
###### Editorial Note on Part 3402

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3402 appear at 76 FR 4807, Jan. 27, 2011.

#### § 3402.8 Fellowship activities.

A USDA Graduate Fellow shall be enrolled as a full-time graduate student, as defined by the institution, at all times during the tenure of the Fellowship in the national need area and at the degree level supported by the grant. This includes the time used for special international study or thesis/dissertation research, if the international travel is funded through a special international study or thesis/dissertation research travel allowance under this grant program. However, the normal requirement for formal registration during part of this tenure may be waived if permitted by the policy of the Fellowship institution, provided that the Graduate Fellow is making satisfactory progress toward degree completion and remains engaged in appropriate full-time Fellowship activities such as thesis/dissertation research. Postdoctoral Fellowship appointments may be held only by persons who pursue full-time traineeship in research, teaching, or extension in the national need area and are supervised by the mentor indicated in the grant application. Graduate and postdoctoral Fellows in academic institutions are not entitled to vacations as such. They are entitled to the short normal student holidays observed by the institution. The time between academic semesters or quarters is to be utilized as an active part of the grant period. During the period of support, USDA Graduate and Postdoctoral Fellows are permitted, at the discretion of their institutions, to accept additional supplemental employment that would positively contribute to their training or research and provide eligibility for tuition waivers (e.g., full or partial tuition waivers provided with research or teaching assignments). A Fellow may accept from any other entity a grant supporting the Fellow's research costs.
#### § 29.1065 Sweating.

The condition of tobacco in the process of fermentation.

[42 FR 21092, Apr. 25, 1977. Redesignated at 47 FR 51721, Nov. 17, 1982, 48 FR 29671, June 28, 1983, 49 FR 16756, Apr. 20, 1984, and 51 FR 25027, July 10, 1986]
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 

FIRST JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND

FOR ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA

MATHEW SELOVER,

Plaintiff,

Case No.: 2020-CA-000077

vs.

ESCAMBIA COUNTY BOARD OF

COUNTY COMMISSIONERS and

RAYME EDLER,

Defendants.

______________________________________/

NOTICE OF LIMITED APPEARANCE

FOR DEFENDANT RAYME EDLER, M.D.

YOU ARE NOTIFIED that the undersigned are appearing as attorneys for Defendant

Rayme Edler, M.D. ("Dr. Edler"), in the instant cause of action for the sole and limited purpose

of filing, arguing and any hearings relating to a Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response

to Plaintiff's Complaint, a Motion to Remove, and any other preliminary filings required to

reserve and protect the rights of Defendant Dr. Edler. Copies of pleadings, motions and other

papers should be served on the undersigned at:

GEORGE F. INDEST III, J.D., M.P.A., LL.M.

Primary e-mail: GIndest@TheHealthLawFirm.com

Secondary e-mail: CourtFilings@TheHealthLawFirm.com

CAROLE C. SCHRIEFER, R.N., J.D.

Primary e-mail: CSchriefer@TheHealthLawFirm.com

Secondary e-mail: CourtFilings@TheHealthLawFirm.com

LANCE O. LEIDER, J.D., LL.M.

Primary e-mail: LLeider@TheHealthLawFirm.com

Secondary e-mail: CourtFilings@TheHealthLawFirm.com

ACHAL A. AGGARWAL, M.B.A., J.D.

Primary e-mail: AAggarwal@TheHealthLawFirm.com

Filing # 104719316 E-Filed 03/11/2020 02:47:24 PM Case 3:20-cv-04698-TKW-HTC Document 1-18 Filed 03/11/20 Page 1 of 2
Secondary e-mail: CourtFilings@TheHealthLawFirm.com

THE HEALTH LAW FIRM

1101 Douglas Avenue, Suite 1000

Altamonte Springs, Florida 32714

Telephone: (407) 331-6620

Telefax: (407) 331-3030

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I have served a copy of the foregoing by filing it with the

Clerk of Court via the E-Portal System, which automatically serves a copy on parties who have

appeared in this matter, on this 11th day of March 2020.

/s/ George F. Indest III

____________________________________

GEORGE F. INDEST III, J.D., M.P.A., LL.M.

Florida Bar No.: 382426

Primary e-mail: GIndest@TheHealthLawFirm.com

Secondary e-mail: CourtFilings@TheHealthLawFirm.com

CAROLE C. SCHRIEFER, R.N., J.D.

Florida Bar No.: 835293

Primary e-mail: CSchriefer@TheHealthLawFirm.com

Secondary e-mail: CourtFilings@TheHealthLawFirm.com

LANCE O. LEIDER, J.D., LL.M.

Florida Bar No.: 96408

Primary e-mail: LLeider@TheHealthLawFirm.com

Secondary e-mail: CourtFilings@TheHealthLawFirm.com

ACHAL A. AGGARWAL, M.B.A., J.D.

Florida Bar No.: 1008038

Primary e-mail: AAggarwal@TheHealthLawFirm.com

Secondary e-mail: CourtFilings@TheHealthLawFirm.com

THE HEALTH LAW FIRM

1101 Douglas Avenue, Suite 1000

Altamonte Springs, Florida 32714

Telephone: (407) 331-6620

Telefax: (407) 331-3030

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT, 

RAYME EDLER, M.D.

GFI/pa

S:\2500-2599\2531\002\410-Pleadings-Drafts & Finals\Notice of Lim Appearance.wpd

- 2 -

Case 3:20-cv-04698-TKW-HTC Document 1-18 Filed 03/11/20 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C SECTION 350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Brooke Credit Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007, (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, Andrea F. Bielsker, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 14, 2007



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Andrea F. Bielsker 
|Andrea F. Bielsker     
|Chief Financial Officer
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| May 13, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Mark Stevenson                    |   |
|--------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|         |   | Mark Stevenson,Principal Executive Officer |   |
|         |   |                                       |   |
|         |   |                                       |   |
| May 13, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Robert Wesolek                         |   |
|         |   | Robert Wesolek,Principal Financial Officer |   |
2006-0989.

#### State ex rel. Brown v. Bernard.

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus and prohibition. Upon consideration of relator’s application for dismissal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal is granted. Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.
Order entered May 1 9 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 14
- 01329
- CV ALBERT LUTTERODT, Appellant
V. EMILY LANE OWNERS AS SOCIATION, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Te xas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 12
- 12648
- G 

### O RDER The reporter’s record in this appeal was filed November 24, 2015, but it did not include the trial exhibits. We have attempted , in three prior orders, to ensure the exhibits are filed. Our last order, enter ed April 16, 2015, directed court reporter Vielica Dobbins to file, no later than May 1, 2015, a supplemental record containing all trial exhibits even though she had not received full payment of her fees

. Our order was based on the delay the lack of a co mplete record is causing in the appeal, e - mail exchanges appellant provided us showing Ms. Dobbins had agreed to a payment plan, and what appeared to be a successful payment plan of the fees associated with the record that has been filed. By letter dated May 8, 2015, Ms. Dobbins informed us that she had not discussed, or approved, payment arrangements with appellant and she is unable to front the cost of preparing the supplemental record.Because this appeal cannot proceed with an incomplete record and app ellant and the court reporter disagree as to the payment of the reporter’s fee , we ORDER the Honorable Dale Tillery, Presiding Judge of the 134th Judicial District Court, to conduct a hearing no later than June 17, 2015 and make findings, based on live or affidavit testimony, as to •the amount of Ms. Dobbins’s fee; •whether Ms. Dobbins agreed to accept payment of her fee in installments; •if Ms. Dobbins agreed to a payment plan, whether specific terms were set; •if specific terms were set, what those terms were; •if no specific terms were set, what terms would be satisfactory to appellant and Ms. Dobbin s ; and, •the amount appellant has paid to date for the record of the exhibits. We further ORDER Dallas County District Clerk Felicia Pitre to file no later th an June 22, 2015 a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s findings of fact from the hearing. The reporter’s record from this hearing shall also be filed no later than June 22, 2015.
We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to Judge Tillery , Ms. Pitre, Ms. Dobbins, and counsel for all parties.
We ABATE this appeal to allow the trial court an opportunity to conduct the hearing. The appeal will be reinstated June 23, 2015 or when the Court receives the requested record s of the hearing, whichever occurs sooner.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO.: 4:03cr40-SPM

HONAY RODRIGUEZ HERNANDEZ

and FRANCISCO PEREZ,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

CORRECTED ORDER DEEMING RESTITUTION SATISFIED 1

This cause comes before the Court on the Government’s Petition

Requesting to Have Restitution Deemed Satisfied (doc. 80). The Government

explains that Defendants were ordered in their criminal judgments to make

restitution to Allied Insurance, a.k.a. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company. A

settlement has been accepted by Nationwide, which is closing its account as

paid in full. Nationwide requests that no further restitution payments be sent. 

Based on the foregoing, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Government’s petition (doc. 80) is granted. 

2. The restitution owed by Defendants to Allied Insurance, a.k.a.

 The original order was entered on July 2, 2009, but contained a 1

scrivener’s error showing the year as 2008. The correction goes to the date of

the order only. No changes to the body of the order have been made.

Case 4:03-cr-00040-SPM Document 82 Filed 07/07/09 Page 1 of 2
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, is deemed satisfied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 7th day of July, 2009, nunc pro tunc July 2,

2009. 

s/ Stephan P. Mickle

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:03-cr-00040-SPM Document 82 Filed 07/07/09 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ANTHONY BASSETT,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:19cv3636/RV/EMT

MARK T. ESPER and DEPARTMENT OF

DEFENSE EDUCATION ACTIVITY,

Defendants.

____________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge’s 

Report and Recommendation dated May 12, 2020 (ECF No. 18). The parties have

been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and afforded an 

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 

636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed 

objections thereto (doc. 19), I have determined the Report and Recommendation 

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, and/or in the Alternative, to Transfer 

Venue (ECF No. 13) is GRANTED.

Case 3:19-cv-03636-RV-EMT Document 20 Filed 05/21/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:19cv3636/RV/EMT

3. The clerk of court is directed to forthwith transfer this action to the United 

States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia where both 

defendants have their principal offices for all further proceedings.

DONE AND ORDERED this day of 21st day of May, 2020.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:19-cv-03636-RV-EMT Document 20 Filed 05/21/20 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2530 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2530

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 26, 2014

                                Received

                           February 27, 2014

          Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To improve transparency and efficiency with respect to audits and 
   communications between taxpayers and the Internal Revenue Service.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Taxpayer Transparency and Efficient 
Audit Act''.

SEC. 2. DEADLINE FOR RESPONSES TO TAXPAYER CORRESPONDENCE.

    Not later than 30 days after receiving any written correspondence 
from a taxpayer, the Internal Revenue Service shall provide a 
substantive written response. For purposes of the preceding sentence, 
an acknowledgment letter shall not be treated as a substantive 
response.

SEC. 3. TAXPAYER NOTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURES BY IRS OF TAXPAYER 
              INFORMATION.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 30 days after disclosing any 
taxpayer information to any agency or instrumentality of Federal, 
State, or local government, the Internal Revenue Service shall provide 
a written notification to the taxpayer describing--
            (1) the information disclosed,
            (2) to whom it was disclosed, and
            (3) the date of disclosure.
    (b) Exception.--Subsection (a) shall not apply if the Secretary of 
the Treasury, or the Secretary's designee, determines that such 
notification would be detrimental to an ongoing criminal investigation 
or pose a risk to national security.

SEC. 4. DEADLINE FOR CONCLUSION OF AUDITS OF INDIVIDUAL TAXPAYERS.

    If any audit of a tax return of an individual by the Internal 
Revenue Service is not concluded before the end of the 1-year period 
beginning on the date of the initiation of such audit, the Internal 
Revenue Service shall provide the taxpayer a written letter explaining 
why such audit has taken more than 1 year to complete.

SEC. 5. NO ADDITIONAL FUNDS AUTHORIZED.

    No additional funds are authorized to carry out the requirements of 
this Act. Such requirements shall be carried out using amounts 
otherwise authorized or appropriated.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 25, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### § 29.6094 Rule 8.

A lot of tobacco meets the specifications of a grade when it is not lower in any degree of any element of quality than the minimum specifications of such grade.
#### § 29.2265 Elasticity.

The flexible, springy nature of the tobacco leaf to recover approximately its original size and shape after it has been stretched. (See chart, § 29.2351.)