alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.12

                     THIRD AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT

THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO Consulting agreement ("THIRD AMENDMENT") is entered into
and made effective as of December 31, 2003 ("THIRD AMENDMENT EFFECTIVE DATE") by
and between Connetics Corporation ("CONNETICS") and Eugene A. Bauer, M.D. ("DR.
BAUER"). Unless otherwise indicated, a capitalized term within this Third
Amendment shall have the same meaning as the same capitalized term within the
Initial Agreement (defined below).

                                    AGREEMENT

Connetics and Dr. Bauer are Parties to a Consulting Agreement dated January 1,
2002 ("INITIAL AGREEMENT"), to an Amendment to Consulting Agreement dated
December 11, 2002 ("AMENDMENT") and to a Second Amendment to Consulting
Agreement dated January 1, 2003 ("SECOND AMENDMENT"). The Initial Agreement, the
Amendment and the Second Amendment are to be known collectively as the
"CONSULTING AGREEMENT." Connetics and Dr. Bauer desire to amend the terms of the
Consulting Agreement as set forth below.

1.   Section 2(a) of the Consulting Agreement is superceded and replaced, in its
     entirety, to read as follows:

          2(a) Connetics hereby retains Dr. Bauer and Dr. Bauer hereby accepts
               this retainer as a consultant to Connetics for the term
               commencing on January 1, 2002 and ending on December 31, 2004.

2.   This Third Amendment may be executed in a number of identical counterparts,
     each of which will be deemed an original, but all of which together will
     constitute one and the same instrument.

3.   All of the remaining provisions of the Consulting Agreement shall continue
     in full force and effect as though fully set forth in this Third Amendment.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have entered into this Third Amendment as of the
Third Amendment Effective Date.

     "CONNETICS"                                    "DR. BAUER"
  CONNETICS CORPORATION                           EUGENE A. BAUER



Signature: /s/ Thomas G. Wiggans          Signature: /s/ Eugene A. Bauer
           ------------------------                  -----------------------
Print: Thomas G. Wiggans                  Print: Eugene A. Bauer, M.D.
Title: President and Chief                Social Security No:  ____________
       Executive Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-40127

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

FAUSTINO MARGARITO TRINIDAD-SALINAS, 

also known as Santos Benavides Gonzalez,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. M-01-CR-603-1

--------------------

January 29, 2003

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Faustino Margarito Trinidad-Salinas appeals the 20-month

sentence imposed by the district court following his entry of a

plea of guilty to a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) & (b) for

being found illegally in the United States subsequent to

deportation and a conviction for an aggravated felony.

Trinidad-Salinas contends that his attorney provided

ineffective assistance because counsel did not challenge the
No. 02-40127

-2-

addition of one point to his criminal history score for each of

two state convictions for driving with excessive blood alcohol

levels. Trinidad-Salinas has not briefed this issue

sufficiently. See United States v. Valdiosera-Godinez, 932 F.2d

1093, 1099 (5th Cir. 1991). Trinidad-Salinas does not explain

why the criminal history was incorrect, he does not provide

citations to the record or to other information to show that the

criminal history is incorrect, and he does not indicate what

counsel should have done. Further, Trinidad-Salinas cannot

establish ineffective assistance because he cannot show

prejudice. See Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 697

(1984). Even if the district court had subtracted two points for

the challenged convictions, Trinidad-Salinas would have had a

criminal history score of four points, which would have resulted

in the same criminal history category III. 

Trinidad-Salinas contends that the Government breached the

plea agreement because it did not make a recommendation at

sentencing that he receive a sentence at the low end of the

applicable Sentencing Guideline range. Because Trinidad-Salinas

did not object at sentencing to the Government’s lack of such a

recommendation, our review of the issue is for plain error only. 

United States v. Reeves, 255 F.3d 208, 210 (5th Cir. 2001). We

will not exercise our discretion to correct a forfeited error

unless the error “seriously affects the fairness, integrity, or

public reputation of judicial proceedings.” Id. 
No. 02-40127

-3-

The district court was aware of the plea agreement’s terms

and imposed sentence in compliance with the agreement. The

sentencing recommendation was incorporated in the presentence

report. See Reeves, 255 F.3d at 210. Trinidad has not

demonstrated a breach or that any error that may have occurred

seriously affected the “fairness, integrity, or public reputation

of judicial proceedings.” Reeves, 255 F.3d at 210. The judgment

of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### § 29.3512 Crude.

A subdegree of maturity. Crude leaves are usually hard and slick as a result of extreme immaturity. A similar condition may result from firekill, sunburn, or sunscald. Any leaf which is crude to the extent of 20 percent or more of its leaf surface may be described as crude. (See Rule 20, § 29.3621.)
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2370 

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 

reauthorize the juvenile accountability block grants program through 

fiscal year 2016. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 13, 2013 

Mr. SCOTT of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets 

Act of 1968 to reauthorize the juvenile accountability 

block grants program through fiscal year 2016. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Juvenile Accountability 

5 Block Grants Program Reauthorization Act of 2013’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2370 IH

1 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF JUVENILE ACCOUNTABILITY 

2 BLOCK GRANTS PROGRAM THROUGH FISCAL 

3 YEAR 2016. 

4 Part R of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and 

5 Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796ee et seq.) is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) in section 1801A(a), by striking ‘‘section 

8 1810(b)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 1810(c)’’; 

9 (2) in section 1810(a), by inserting ‘‘and each 

10 of the fiscal years 2014 through 2016’’ after 

11 ‘‘2009’’; and 

12 (3) in section 1810(b), by inserting ‘‘and each 

13 of the fiscal years 2014 through 2016’’ after 

14 ‘‘2004’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2522 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2522

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve and make permanent 
 the Department of Veterans Affairs loan guarantee for the purchase of 
     residential cooperative housing units, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 26, 2013

   Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney of New York (for herself and Ms. Norton) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve and make permanent 
 the Department of Veterans Affairs loan guarantee for the purchase of 
     residential cooperative housing units, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fair Access to Co-ops for Veterans 
Act''.

SEC. 2. IMPROVEMENT OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS LOAN GUARANTEE 
              FOR PURCHASE OF RESIDENTIAL COOPERATIVE HOUSING UNITS.

    (a) In General.--Section 3710 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(12), by striking ``and before the 
        date that is five years after that date,''; and
            (2) in subsection (h)--
                    (A) by redesignating paragraphs (2) and (3) as 
                paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively; and
                    (B) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following 
                new paragraph (2):
    ``(2) In prescribing regulations to carry out subsection (a)(12) 
the Secretary shall ensure that a loan for the purchase of stock or 
membership in a cooperative housing corporation that has been reviewed 
and approved by a lender approved by the Federal National Mortgage 
Association is not denied.''.
    (b) Authority To Advertise.--The Secretary of Veterans Affairs 
shall use the authority of the Secretary under section 532 of title 38, 
United States Code, to advertise the availability of loan guarantees 
for housing cooperative share loans under section 3710(a)(12) of such 
title and shall take such other appropriate actions as may be necessary 
to notify eligible veterans, participating lenders, and interested 
realtors of the availability of such loan guarantees and the procedures 
and requirements that apply to the obtaining of such guarantees.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 3011.1 General statement.

This part is issued in accordance with 7 CFR 1.3 of the Department of Agriculture regulations governing the availability of records (7 CFR 1.1-1.23 and Appendix A) under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552, as amended). These regulations supplement the Department's regulations by providing guidance for any person wishing to request records from the Office of Finance and Management (OFM).
§ 3201.125 Durable cutlery. ( a ) *Definition.* Durable cutlery consists of dining utensils that are designed to be used multiple times.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The Federal preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 28 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than July 6, 2020, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased durable cutlery. By that date, Federal agencies responsible for drafting or reviewing specifications for products to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased durable cutlery.
[84 FR 32021, July 5, 2019]
#### § 30.19 Nested.

Any lot of tobacco which has been so handled or packed as to conceal damaged, injured, tangled, or inferior tobacco, or foreign matter.
# CI2021348EN.01000101.xml

| 30.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 348/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 348/1

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 19 July 2021

adopting the Council’s position on draft amending budget No 1 of the European Union for the financial year 2021

(2021/C 348 I/01)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 314 thereof, in conjunction with the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,

Having regard to Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 July 2018 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union, amending Regulations (EU) No 1296/2013, (EU) No 1301/2013, (EU) No 1303/2013, (EU) No 1304/2013, (EU) No 1309/2013, (EU) No 1316/2013, (EU) No 223/2014, (EU) No 283/2014, and Decision No 541/2014/EU and repealing Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 (1), and in particular Article 44 thereof,

Whereas:

| — | the Union’s budget for the financial year 2021 was definitively adopted on 18 December 2020 (2); |
| --- | --- |

—

the Union’s budget for the financial year 2021 was definitively adopted on 18 December 2020 (2);

| — | on 22 January 2021, the Commission submitted a proposal containing draft amending budget No 1 to the general budget for the financial year 2021; |
| --- | --- |

—

on 22 January 2021, the Commission submitted a proposal containing draft amending budget No 1 to the general budget for the financial year 2021;

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The Council’s position on draft amending budget No 1 of the European Union for the financial year 2021 was adopted on 19 July 2021.

The full text can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the Council’s website: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/.

Done at Brussels, on 19 July 2021.

For the Council

The President

J. PODGORŠEK

---

(1)  OJ L 193, 30.7.2018, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 93, 17.3.2021, p. 1.

2

---
39–008 

108TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 108–783 

WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(a) OF RULE XIII 

WITH RESPECT TO THE SAME DAY CONSIDERATION OF 

CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED BY THE RULES 

COMMITTEE 

NOVEMBER 18, 2004.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. LINDER, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 860] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 860, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives clause 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring a twothirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is reported from 

the Rules Committee) against certain resolutions reported from the 

Rules Committee. The rule applies the waiver to any resolution reported on or before the legislative day of November 20, 2004, providing for consideration or disposition of a conference report to accompany the bill (S. 2845) to reform the intelligence community 

and the intelligence and intelligence-related activities of the United 

States Government, and for other purposes. 

Æ
149 So.2d 766

#### David C. SMITH v. H. H. HENRY et al.

No. 46581.

Feb. 8, 1963.

Application not considered. The application has not been filed within thirty days after a rehearing was denied by the Court ■of Appeal, as required by Sec. 11 of Art. 7 »of the Constitution and R.S. 13:4450.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2565 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2565

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To provide for the termination of employment of employees of the 
    Internal Revenue Service who take certain official actions for 
                          political purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop Targeting Our Politics IRS 
Act'' or as the ``STOP IRS Act''.

SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE EMPLOYEES 
              FOR TAKING OFFICIAL ACTIONS FOR POLITICAL PURPOSES.

    Paragraph (10) of section 1203(b) of the Internal Revenue Service 
Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 is amended to read as follows:
            ``(10) performing, delaying, or failing to perform (or 
        threatening to perform, delay, or fail to perform) any official 
        action (including any audit) with respect to a taxpayer for 
        purpose of extracting personal gain or benefit or for a 
        political purpose.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 31, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2565

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To provide for the termination of employment of employees of the 
    Internal Revenue Service who take certain official actions for 
                          political purposes.
```
#### § 351.4 Records.

The customs officers at Washington, DC, Brownsville, Tex., Hoboken, N.J., Honolulu, Hawaii, Jamaica, L.I., N.Y., Laredo, Tex., Miami, Fla., New Orleans, La., San Francisco, Calif., San Juan, P.R., San Pedro, Calif., or Seattle, Wash., shall keep a record of such packages as may be delivered to representatives of the Department of Agriculture, and upon the return thereof shall prepare a mail entry to accompany the dutiable package and deliver it to the postmaster for delivery or onward dispatch or in appropriate cases subject the shipment to formal customs entry procedure.

[28 FR 5204, May 24, 1963]
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Mercedes Rodriguez, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[814 NYS2d 394]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Ap*1146peal Board, filed May 23, 2005, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant, a hotel housekeeper, took an approved two-week vacation to Puerto Rico in March 2004. While there, she learned of a dispute concerning taxes owed on her Puerto Rican property and notified the employer she would be a week late in returning. Subsequent delays in resolving the tax issue caused claimant to again notify the employer in April and May that she could not yet return. On July 8, 2004, two months after last contacting the employer, claimant reported to work and was informed that she was considered to have abandoned her job. Under such circumstances, substantial evidence supports the-decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that claimant voluntarily left her employment without good cause (see *Matter of Jimenez [A&L Pen Mfg. Corp.—Commissioner of Labor],*27 AD3d 941, 942 [2006]; *Matter of Imran [Sweeney],*212 AD2d 927, 928 [1995]; *Matter of Burton [Levine],*51 AD2d 840, 840 [1976]).

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Carpinello, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2613 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2613

To amend the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 
    to provide the President with the authority to exempt civilian 
      Department of Defense personnel accounts from sequestration.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 8, 2013

Mr. Barrow of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                     to the Committee on the Budget

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 
    to provide the President with the authority to exempt civilian 
      Department of Defense personnel accounts from sequestration.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OPTIONAL EXEMPTION OF CIVILIAN DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 
              PERSONNEL.

    Section 255(f) of the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control 
Act of 1985 is amended--
            (1) in the side heading by inserting before the period at 
        the end ``and Civilian Department of Defense Personnel''; and
            (2) in paragraph (1) by inserting ``and any civilian 
        Department of Defense personnel account'' after ``miltary 
        personnel account''.
                                 <all>
```
**NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY**

**– OREGON** 

The U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services program (Wildlife Services) has issued a Decision and Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI ) for the Final Environmental A ssessment (EA) entitled “Wildlife Services' Gray

Wolf Damage Management In Oregon
. " A pre
- decision EA was issued for public comment in July 2012. The proposed action in the EA is for Wildlife Services to assist the State of Oregon, Department of Fish and W ildlife (ODFW) and Native American tribal governments with management of gray wolf conflicts throughout the state where wolves are not federall y protected. The EA analyzes issues and potential environmental effects of the proposal and alternatives. Based on the analy sis contained in the EA, Wildlife Services has decided to implement the proposed action as described in the EA, and has concluded that it will not have a significant impact on the quality of the human environment. The EA , including a summary of public comments, and the Decision and FONSI may be accessed at: http://www.aphis.usda.gov/wps/portal/aphis/ourfocus/wildlifedamage T he Final EA and Decision and FONSI may also be obtained b y contacting: State Director, USDA APHI S Wildlife Services, 6135 NE 80th Ave., Ste. A

- 8, Portland, OR 97218, Tel: (503) 326

- 2346.
#### Roosevelt Coal Company et al., v. Edward Hadesman et al. Brentwood Hotel, Inc., appellee, v. Edward Hadesman et al., appellants, on appeal of Stella G. Hadesman and Edward I. Hadesman, appellants.

Gen. No. 37,793.

Opinion filed November 27, 1934.

Nathan Shefner and Aaron Soble, for appellants. George C. Rabens, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Sullivan

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### § 3011.6 Fee schedule.

Departmental regulations provide for a schedule of reasonable standard charges for document search and duplication. See 7 CFR 1.2(b). Fees to be charged are set forth in 7 CFR part 1, subpart A, Appendix A.