alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.8
 
 KB HOME
 PERFORMANCE-BASED INCENTIVE PLAN FOR SENIOR MANAGEMENT
 (as amended and restated on October 2, 2008)
 Purpose.
 Definitions.
       1




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



3




---



##### 



Administration.
 Authority of Committee.
 Committee Discretion Binding.
 Award Limits.
 Plan Shares.
 4




---



##### 



Individual Stock-Based Awards.
 Adjustments.
 Substitute Awards.
 Sources of Shares Deliverable Under Awards.
 5




---



##### 



Cash Award Limits.
 Eligibility.
 Performance-Based Bonuses.
     Stock Options.
 Grant.
 6




---



##### 



Exercise Price.
 Exercise.
 Payment.
 Stock Appreciation Rights.
 Grant.
 Exercise and Payment.
 7




---



##### 



Other Terms and Conditions.
 Restricted Stock.
 Grant.
 Transfer Restrictions.
 Dividends and Distributions.
 Change of Ownership.
 8




---



##### 



Other Stock-Based Awards.
 Amendment and Termination.
 Amendments to the Plan.
 Amendments to Awards.
 Adjustment of Awards Upon the Occurrence of Certain Unusual or Nonrecurring Events.
 9




---



##### 



Cancellation.
 General Provisions.
 Dividend Equivalents.
 Nontransferability.
 No Rights to Awards.
 Share Certificates.
 Withholding.
 10




---



##### 



Award Agreements.
 No Limit on Other Compensation Arrangements.
 No Right to Employment.
 No Rights as Stockholder.
 Governing Law.
 Severability.
 11




---



##### 



Other Laws.
 No Trust or Fund Created.
 No Fractional Shares.
 Headings.
 Section 409A.
  12




---



##### 



Term of the Plan.
 Effective Date.
 Expiration Date.
 13
|   | 1. |   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                         |
|--------|----|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 2. |   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

|                         | India      Globalization Capital, Inc. |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|------------------------------|----------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                         |                                   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |   |
| Date:      February 17, 2009 | By:                                    | /s/ Ram      Mukunda                                                                |   |
|                         |                                   | Ram      Mukunda                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |   |
|                         |                                   | Chief      Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive    Officer)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |   |
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.38

Quinton Cardiology Systems, Inc.
Executive Officers - 2005 Base Salaries

Base salary amounts were approved by the Compensation Committee, to be effective
February 28, 2005, as set forth below. The compensation arrangement between the
Company and each executive officer listed below is governed by an employment
agreement between the Company and each executive officer.

<TABLE>
<S>                            <C>                                    <C>
John Hinson                    Chief Executive Officer                $ 272,500
Mike Matysik                   Chief Financial Officer                $ 202,195
Allan Criss                    Vice President, Acute Care             $ 175,950
David Hadley                   Vice President, Research               $ 170,040
Atul Jhalani                   Vice President, Marketing              $ 163,710
Darryl Lustig                  Vice President, Primary Care           $ 173,896
Feroze Motafram                Vice President, Operations             $ 166,920
</TABLE>
98-1442.

#### State v. Sova.

Cuyahoga App. Nos. 71923 and 71924. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted.

F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents.
# United States Court of Appealsfor Veterans Claims

      - Home
      - About the Court
      - Helpful Links
      - Employment
      - FAQs
      - Contact Us

		Chief Judge**Michael P. Allen**		Clerk of the Court**Tiffany M. Wagner**

### Welcome to the USCAVC Opinion and Decision Search Site

----

**Search Options:** Advanced SearchMenu AssistedNatural Language

----

ShowHide search tips

### Search Tips

          - AND searches     example:  medical and dental 
          - OR searches     example:  medical or dental 
          - Use quotation marks for exact phrase     example:  "medical malpractice" 
          - Use /10/ for matches within 10 words (note: this only works for the number 10)     example:  medical /10/ malpractice     The example above searches for medical within 10 words of malpractice.
          - Use // for matches within the same paragraph     example:  medical // malpractice     The example above searches for medical within the same paragraph as malpractice.
          - When setting up your search, be sure to select Panel Opinions where offered to see precedential opinions. Because of Rule 30(a), you cannot cite to single judge decisions.
          - From the results list, click on the primary link to see an HTML rendering of the document. Your search terms will be highlighted in yellow.
          - When viewing a document, click on the word [Download] in the upper left of the screen to see the original PDF or Word Perfect document.

----

**United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims**
**Case related matters only**
#### § 29.3528 Leaf surface.

The roughness or smoothness of the web or lamina of a tobacco leaf. Leaf surface is affected to some extent by the size and shrinkage of the veins or fibers (See Elements of Quality, § 29.3586.)

[30 FR 9207, July 23, 1965. Redesignated at 49 FR 16759, Apr. 20, 1984]
§ 3300.37 Testing of a mechanical refrigerating appliance. For separate testing of a mechanical refrigerating appliance, the following shall pertain: ( a ) The calibrated-box method shall be used, as set forth in ARI Standard 1110, Standard for Mechanical Refrigeration Units, of the Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration Institute.
( b ) The appliance shall be rated according to the class, or classes, of service for which the appliance is intended, with classes being defined as in ATP, Annex 1, paragraph 3.
( c ) A report of each test shall be completed on a form corresponding to the pertinent test report model prescribed in ATP, Annex 1, Appendix 2. Report forms may be obtained by a request to the ATP manager.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2383 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2383

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the new Interstate Route 70 bridge over the Mississippi 
River connecting St. Louis, Missouri, and southwestern Illinois as the 
               ``Stan Musial Veterans Memorial Bridge''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STAN MUSIAL VETERANS MEMORIAL BRIDGE.

    (a) Designation.--The new Interstate Route 70 bridge over the 
Mississippi River that connects St. Louis, Missouri, to southwestern 
Illinois shall be known and designated as the ``Stan Musial Veterans 
Memorial Bridge''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the bridge referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Stan 
Musial Veterans Memorial Bridge''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 25, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2383

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the new Interstate Route 70 bridge over the Mississippi 
River connecting St. Louis, Missouri, and southwestern Illinois as the 
               ``Stan Musial Veterans Memorial Bridge''.
```
Editorial Note on Part 3403
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3403 appear at 76 FR 4807, Jan. 27, 2011.

§ 3403.3 Eligibility requirements. ( a ) *Eligibility of organization.* ( 1 ) To receive SBIR funds, each awardee of a SBIR Phase I or Phase II must qualify as a small business concern.
( 2 ) For Phase I, a minimum of two-thirds of the research or analytical effort, as measured by the budget, must be performed by the awardee. Occasionally, deviations from this requirement may occur, and must be approved in writing by the ADO after consultation with the agency SBIR National Program Leader.
( 3 ) For Phase II, a minimum of one-half of the research or analytical effort, as measured by the budget, must be performed by the awardee. Occasionally, deviations from this requirement may occur, and must be approved in writing by the ADO after consultation with the agency SBIR National Program Leader.
( 4 ) For both Phase I and Phase II, the primary employment of the principal investigator must be with the SBC at the time of award and during the conduct of the proposed project. Primary employment means that more than one-half of the principal investigator's time is spent in the employ of the SBC. This precludes full-time employment with another organization. Occasionally, deviations from this requirement may occur, and must be approved in writing by the ADO after consultation with the agency SBIR National Program Leader. Further, an SBC may replace the principal investigator on an SBIR Phase I or Phase II award, subject to approval in writing by the ADO after consultation with the SBIR National Program Leader. For purposes of the SBIR Program, personnel obtained through a Professional Employer Organization or other similar personnel leasing company must be considered employees of the awardee. This is consistent with SBA's size regulations, 13 CFR 121.106—Small Business Size Regulations.
( 5 ) For both Phase I and Phase II, the R/R&D must be performed in the United States. However, based on a rare and unique circumstance, ADO approval may be granted to perform a particular portion of the research or research and development work outside of the United States, for example, if a supply of material or other item or project requirement is not available in the United States. The ADO, after consultation with the agency SBIR National Program Leader, must approve each such specific condition in writing.
( b ) [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 10.100

                                                                  CHAIRMAN & CEO


                                  July 26, 2004

Mr. Jim Hertzog
317 Spring Canyon Way
Oceanside, CA 92057

Dear Jim:

I am pleased to offer you the position of Controller at HiEnergy Technologies,
Inc. ("the Company"). Your role will be essentially the same with the Company as
it has been with you as a consultant to the Company. You will help the Company
with accounting and finance issues and SEC reporting.

Below are terms which I can offer to you:

     1.   Your employment will begin 07-26-04.

     2.   HiEnergy agrees to pay any legal costs you may incur in connection
          with your work for HiEnergy.

     3.   HiEnergy agrees to indemnify you against any judgments not covered by
          the Company's D & O policy.

     4.   HiEnergy agrees to keep D & O coverage in force at all times with the
          present policy limits and for the three years following termination of
          my services on a commercially reasonable effort.

     5.   HiEnergy agrees to pay you $60.00 per hour for work performed
          beginning 07-26-04.

     6.   Hi Energy agrees to issue you 100,000 warrants with a five year term
          at the closing price on 07-26-04 which vest immediately and will be
          part of the next registration statement.

     7.   HiEnergy agrees to reimburse your health and dental insurance on a
          monthly basis which is presently $311 per month.

     8.   HiEnergy agrees to reimburse you for reasonable out of pocket expenses
          for your home office.

     9.   HiEnergy agrees that you may continue to do most of your work from
          home. You agree to come to Irvine on an as needed basis.

     10.  You will agree to continue to in the same role with HiEnergy as you
          have in the past as a non-employee taking direction from me and Greg
          Henkel.

If these terms are agreeable to you, please sign below and I will arrange to
have an indemnification agreement drafted by the Company's counsel.

<PAGE>

Jim Hertzog
Employment Offer
Page 2


-------------------------------------
Bogdan C. Maglich
Chairman and CEO


Agreed and Accepted:



-------------------------------------
Jim Hertzog
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Serrato, Appellant.

[Cite as *State v. Serrato*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 113.]

(No. 97-2261

Submitted August 19, 1998

Decided September 16, 1998.)

*Alan R. Mayberry,*Wood County Prosecuting Attorney, and *Gwen HoweGebers,*Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

*Jeffrey M. Gamso,*for appellant.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of *State v. Rush*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 53, 697 N.E.2d 634.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Resnick, J., not participating.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 4:01cr9-RH/WCS

JORGE TURO,

Defendant.

__________________________________/

ORDER REDUCING SENTENCE

The term of imprisonment to which defendant Jorge Turo is sentenced is

hereby reduced to a term of ninety (90) months. In all other respects the original

sentence remains unchanged.

SO ORDERED this 9th day of May, 2005.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

Chief United States District Judge 

Case 4:01-cr-00009-RH Document 29 Filed 05/09/05 Page 1 of 1
2006-0650.

#### Strubing v. Jeffreys.

In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Jackson D. Strubing Jr. Sua sponte, cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  information   extracted  from  the  financial
statements of the December 31, 1996 Form 10-K of High Cash  Partners,  L.P. and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,774,565
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   78,929
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,020,397
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,485,903
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          509,344
<BONDS>                                     15,691,865
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,229,435
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,485,903
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,637,022
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,137,214
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               478,846
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,661,146
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (640,184)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (640,184)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
         

</TABLE>
Case 3:96-cr-00058-RV-MD   Document 312   Filed 08/04/06   Page 1 of 1
§ 250.68 Nutrition Services Incentive Program (NSIP). ( a ) *Distribution of donated foods in NSIP.* The Department provides donated foods in NSIP to State Units on Aging and their selected elderly nutrition projects for use in providing meals to elderly persons. NSIP is administered at the Federal level by DHHS' Administration for Community Living (ACL), which provides an NSIP grant each year to State Units on Aging. The State agencies may choose to receive all, or part, of the grant as donated foods, on behalf of its elderly nutrition projects. The Department is responsible for the purchase of the donated foods and their delivery to State Units on Aging. ACL is responsible for transferring funds to the Department for the cost of donated food purchases and for expenses related to such purchases.
( b ) *Types and quantities of donated foods distributed.* Each State Unit on Aging, and its elderly nutrition projects, may receive any types of donated foods available in food distribution or child nutrition programs, to the extent that such foods may be distributed cost-effectively. Each State Unit on Aging may receive donated foods with a value equal to its NSIP grant. Each State Unit on Aging and elderly nutrition project may also receive donated foods under Section 32, Section 416, and Section 709, as available, and under Section 14 (42 U.S.C. 1762(a)).
( c ) *Role of distributing agency.* The Department delivers NSIP donated foods to distributing agencies, which distribute them to elderly nutrition projects selected by each State Unit on Aging. The distributing agency may only distribute donated foods to elderly nutrition projects with which they have signed agreements. The agreements must contain provisions that describe the roles of each party in ensuring that the desired donated foods are ordered, stored, and distributed in an effective manner.
( d ) *Donated food values used in crediting a State Unit on Aging's NSIP grant.* FNS uses the average price (cost per pound) for USDA purchases of a donated food made in a contract period in crediting a State Unit on Aging's NSIP grant.
( e ) *Coordination between FNS and ACL.* FNS and ACL coordinate their respective roles in NSIP through the execution of annual agreements. The agreement ensures that ACL transfers funds to FNS sufficient to purchase the donated foods requested by State Units on Aging, and to meet expenses related to such purchases. The agreement also authorizes FNS to carry over any such funds that are not used in the current fiscal year to make purchases of donated foods for the appropriate State Units on Aging in the following fiscal year.
[81 FR 23113, Apr. 19, 2016]
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

RONNIE LEE CRAWFORD,

Petitioner,

vs. CASE NO. 1:03CV86-SPM/AK

JAMES V. CROSBY,

Respondent.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 4, Amended Petition for Writ of

Habeas Corpus, filed by Ronnie Lee Crawford. At the time this proceeding was

instituted, Petitioner was incarcerated at Cross City Correctional Institution, which

is located within the Northern District of Florida. He challenges his conviction out

of the Circuit Court of Duval County, Florida. Jurisdiction is therefore appropriate

in either this district or in the United States District Court for the Middle District of

Florida, as the districts of confinement and conviction, respectively. 28 U.S.C. §

2241(d). 

Case 1:03-cv-00086-SPM-AK Document 17 Filed 06/07/05 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

1:03cv86-SPM/AK

The district of conviction would appear to be the most convenient for

witnesses should an evidentiary hearing be necessary, and therefore, transfer of

this cause to the Middle District is appropriate. Mitchell v. Henderson, 432 F.2d

435, 436 (5th Cir. 1970) (division of conviction, where witnesses were located, was

appropriate venue over division of confinement in challenge to conviction); Parker

v. Singletary, 974 F.2d 1562, 1582, n. 118 (11th Cir. 1992) (courts should give

careful consideration to convenience of witnesses in transferring habeas corpus

petitions under § 2241(d)). 

It is therefore respectfully RECOMMENDED that this case be

TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

for all further proceedings.

IN CHAMBERS at Gainesville, Florida, this 7th day of June, 2005.

s/ A. KORNBLUM 

ALLAN KORNBLUM

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 15 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party's objections within 10 days after

being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the scope of

review of proposed factual findings and recommendations. 

Case 1:03-cv-00086-SPM-AK Document 17 Filed 06/07/05 Page 2 of 2
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF QUINTANA MARITIME LIMITED
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350
 § §
 1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Stamatis V. MolarisName:
    Stamatis V. MolarisDate:
    November 9, 2006