alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Section 906Certification**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), the undersigned officer of GuarantyBancorp (the “Company”) hereby certifies that the Company’s QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated:October 30, 2009

 

 
|   | /s/ Daniel M. Quinn |
|--------|---------------------|
|   | Name:               | Daniel M. Quinn |
|   | Title:              | *Chief  Executive Officer* |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnishedsolely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C. Section 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as aseparate disclosure document.

 

----
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No

PMN: 10-0224

Focus Ready Draft 3/11/2010

ENGINEER: El-Zoobi \ CLM

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER:

USE: 

OTHER USES: 

MSDS: Label: No

Gen Eqpt:

Respirator: 

Health Effects:

TLV/PEL:

CRSS :

Chemical Name: 

S-H20: 1 g/L @

VP: 1.0E-6 torr @

MW: %<500 %<1000

Physical State and Misc CRSS Info:
Consumer Use: 

SAT (concerns) (03/02/2010):

 

Migration to groundwater: Anion rapid; Cation moderate

PBT rating: P3B1T2 Anion: P3B1T2 // Cation: P1B1T1

Health: 2 Drinking Water, Inhalation

Eco: 1 No releases to Water

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2B

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

P2 Claims: 
EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT CBI: No

PMN: 10-0224

Use: 

Number of Sites/ Location: 

Days/yr: 

Basis:

Process Description: 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below

may coincide with daily releases from the other sources

to the same medium.

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes:

Basis: 

Inhalation:

Dermal:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM JONES MEDICAL
INDUSTRIES, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND STATEMENT OF INCOME AS OF
DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND FOR THE TWELVE MONTH PERIOD THEN ENDED.  THIS SCHEDULE
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                           8,342
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,125
<ALLOWANCES>                                       187
<INVENTORY>                                     13,014
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                33,337
<PP&E>                                          22,508
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,849
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  86,238
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,405
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           969
<OTHER-SE>                                      54,970
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    86,238
<SALES>                                         39,937
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                39,937
<CGS>                                           14,639
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,639
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    64
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 655
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,388
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,074
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,314
<DISCONTINUED>                                   7,075
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,389
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .50


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2161 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2161

    To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to extend the reduced 
           interest rates for Federal Direct Stafford Loans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2013

 Mr. Gohmert introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
   Committee on Education and the Workforce, and in addition to the 
 Committees on Energy and Commerce and the Budget, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to extend the reduced 
           interest rates for Federal Direct Stafford Loans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Assisting Students with Loans Act''.

SEC. 2. INTEREST RATE EXTENSION.

    Subparagraph (D) of section 455(b)(7) of the Higher Education Act 
of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087e(b)(7)(D)) is amended--
            (1) in the matter preceding clause (i), by striking 
        ``2013'' and inserting ``2015''; and
            (2) in clause (v), by striking ``2013'' and inserting 
        ``2015''.

SEC. 3. REPEALING PREVENTION AND PUBLIC HEALTH FUND.

    (a) In General.--Section 4002 of the Patient Protection and 
Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 300u-11) is repealed.
    (b) Rescission of Unobligated Funds.--Of the funds made available 
by such section 4002, the unobligated balance is rescinded.

SEC. 4. COMPLIANCE WITH STATUTORY PAY-AS-YOU-GO ACT OF 2010.

    The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying 
with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by 
reference to the latest statement titled ``Budgetary Effects of PAYGO 
Legislation'' for this Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional 
Record by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, provided that 
such statement has been submitted prior to the vote on passage.
                                 <all>
```
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2032 

To prohibit certain transfers of radioactive metal by the Department of 

Energy, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 16, 2013 

Mr. MARKEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To prohibit certain transfers of radioactive metal by the 

Department of Energy, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ban All Radioactive 

5 Recycling Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RADIOACTIVE METAL. 

7 (a) AMENDMENT.—Subtitle D of title I of the Nu8 clear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (42 U.S.C. 10171) is 

9 amended by adding at the end the following new section: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2032 IH

1 ‘‘RADIOACTIVE METAL

2 ‘‘SEC. 152. (a) PROHIBITION.—The Department of 

3 Energy shall not plan or undertake sales, trades, barters, 

4 or transfers of any metal that has been used or stored 

5 in a radiological area other than for the purposes of stor6 age pursuant to subsection (b). 

7 ‘‘(b) STORAGE.—Such metal shall, when removed 

8 from the radiological area in which it was used or stored, 

9 be stored or disposed of at a site— 

10 ‘‘(1) specifically licensed by the Commission for 

11 the storage or disposal of radioactive waste; 

12 ‘‘(2) specifically licensed by a State pursuant to 

13 section 274 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 

14 U.S.C. 2021) for the storage or disposal of radio15 active waste; or 

16 ‘‘(3) at a site on property owned by the Depart17 ment of Energy that has been approved by the Sec18 retary for the storage or disposal of radioactive 

19 waste.’’. 

20 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of con21 tents of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 is amended 

22 by adding after the item relating to section 151 the fol23 lowing new item: 

‘‘Sec. 152. Radioactive metal.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENSACOLA DISTRICT 

IN RE: 3m COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCTS 

LIABILITY LITIGATION 

This Document Relates to 

Stephen Blackburn, 7:20-cv-46474

 Case No. 3:19-md-2885 

Hon. Judge M. Casey Rodgers 

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones 

TO: The Clerk of court and all parties of record 

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as 

counsel for Plaintiff, Stephen Blackburn. 

Date: April 16, 2020 

Respectfully Submitted,

HARE, WYNN, NEWELL & NEWTON, LLP 

By: /s/ Jason W. Earley

Jason W. Earley (pro hac vice) 

ALBN 3427Q10M 

HARE, WYNN, NEWELL & NEWTON, LLP 

2025 Third Avenue North, 8th Floor 

Birmingham, AL 35203 

jason@hwnn.com

Phone: 205-328-5330 

Facsimile: 205-324-2165 

Attorney for Plaintiff Stephen Blackburn

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned, an attorney, certifies that the foregoing Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice was 

filed electronically with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system on April 16, 2020 which 

will serve same electronically on all counsel of record. 

/s/ Jason W. Earley
###### Editorial Note on Part 1956

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1956 appear at 80 FR 9901, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1956.54 Definitions.

*Adjustment.* The reduction of a debt or claim conditioned upon completion of payment of the adjusted amount at a specific future time or times, with or without the payment of any consideration when the adjustment offer is approved. An adjustment is not a final settlement until all payments under the adjustment agreement(s) have been made.

*Amount of debt.* The outstanding balance of the amount loaned including principal and interest plus any outstanding advances, including interest, and subsidy to be recaptured made by the Government on behalf of the borrower.

*Cancellation.* The final discharge of a debt without any payment on it.

*Chargeoff.* The writing off of a debt and termination of collection activity without release of personal liability.

*Compromise.* The satisfaction of a debt or claim by the acceptance of a lump-sum payment of less than the total amount owed on the debt or claim.

*Debt forgiveness.* For the purposes of servicing Farm Loan Programs loans, debt forgiveness is defined as a reduction or termination of a direct FLP loan in a manner that results in a loss to the Government. Included, but not limited to, are losses from a writedown or writeoff under 7 CFR part 766, debt settlement, after discharge under the provisions of the bankruptcy code, and associated with release of liability. Debt cancellation through conservation easements or contracts is not considered debt forgiveness for loan servicing purposes.

*Debtor.* The borrower of funds under any of the FmHA or its successor agency under Public Law 103-354 programs. This includes co-signors, guarantors and persons or entities that initially obtained or assumed a loan. Debtor also includes grant recipients.

*Farm Loan Programs (FLP) loans.* Farm Ownership (FO), Operating (OL), Soil and Water (SW), Economic Emergency (EE), Emergency (EM), Recreation (RL), Special Livestock (SL), Softwood Timber (ST) loans, and/or Rural Housing Loans for farm services buildings (RHF).

*Housing programs.* All programs and claims arising under programs administered by FmHA or its successor agency under Public Law 103-354 under title V of the Housing Act of 1949.

*Servicing office.* The FmHA or its successor agency under Public Law 103-354 office that is responsible for the account.

*Settlement.* The compromise, adjustment, cancellation, or chargeoff of a debt owed to FmHA or its successor agency under Public Law 103-354. The term “Settlement” is used for convenience in referring to compromise, adjustment, cancellation, or chargeoff actions, individually or collectively.

*United States Attorney.* An attorney for the United States Department of Justice.

[56 FR 10147, Mar. 11, 1991, as amended at 58 FR 21344, Apr. 21, 1993; 62 FR 10157, Mar. 5, 1997; 72 FR 64123, Nov. 15, 2007]
Page 1 of 2 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PANAMA CITY DIVISION 

EDWARD TYRONE RIDLEY, 

Petitioner, 

v. Case No. 5:20cv126-RV-HTC 

BENJAMIN FORD, 

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, 

Respondents. 

 / 

ORDER 

 This case is before the Court based on the Magistrate Judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 3) that this case should be construed as a civil rights action 

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), as Ridley is 

subject to the three-strikes rule, or, alternatively, that if the case is construed as an 

action under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, it should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Ridley 

filed an “emergency” objection to the Report and Recommendation (ECF Doc. 4) 

and an “expedited emergency” motion (ECF Doc. 5), both of which move the Court 

to allow him to amend his petition to remove requests for monetary damages, 

including punitive damages. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, 

Case 5:20-cv-00126-RV-HTC Document 6 Filed 06/03/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2 

Case No. 5:20cv126-RV-HTC

the objection at ECF Doc. 4, and the motion at ECF Doc. 5, I have determined that 

the proposed amendment would be futile and that the Report and Recommendation 

should be adopted. Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED that: 

1. The Expedited Emergency Motion to Only Dismiss Any and All 

Monetary and Punitive Damages (ECF Doc. 5) is DENIED. 

2. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 3) is 

adopted, over Petitioner’s objections at ECF Doc. 4, and incorporated 

by reference in this Order. 

3. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under 28 U.S.C. § 

1915(g). 

4. The clerk is directed to close the file. 

 DONE AND ORDERED this 3rd day of June, 2020. 

s/ Roger Vinson / 

ROGER VINSON 

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:20-cv-00126-RV-HTC Document 6 Filed 06/03/20 Page 2 of 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David Benjamin Detling, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, rendered July 6, 1977, convicting him of burglary in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial ordered. The defendant was deprived of his right to effective assistance of counsel by the following glaring deficiencies in his representation by defense counsel: (1) The failure to move for a *Huntley*hearing despite claims by the 18-year-old defendant that his statements were coerced by the arresting officers and that he was not permitted access to his father until after he had confessed. (2) The failure to move for a hearing to determine whether there was probable cause for the arrest of the defendant, who was seized on the basis of a tip from an unidentified informant. (3) The failure to call the defendant’s father *938as an alibi witness at trial despite the fact that the father had testified before the Grand Jury that the defendant was at home with him at the time of the alleged burglary. As a result of the foregoing omissions, we cannot conclude that defendant’s representation "was adequate or effective in any meaningful sense of the words” (see *People v Droz,*39 NY2d 457, 463) and there must be a new trial. We do not agree that the weakness of the proof adduced requires dismissal. Lazer, J. P., Gibbons and Gulotta, JJ., concur.

Cohalan, J.,

concurs insofar as the majority has reversed the judgment, but otherwise dissents and votes to dismiss the indictment on the ground that defendant was not proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
Appeal No. 78-220.

#### Gustave D. Heon, Administrator of the Estate of Leontine A. Heon *v.*Paul A. Boucher *et ux.*

On December 15, 1975, at approximately 1 p.m., the defendant husband, Paul A. Boucher, was operating his wife’s automobile in a northerly direction along Lonsdale Avenue in Pawtucket. The vehicle struck and fatally injured Leontine A. Heon, a 71-year-old pedestrian who was attempting to cross the highway. She died within minutes, and this civil action ensued.

At a Superior Court jury-waived hearing, the trial justice found that Mr. Boucher was 75 per cent responsible and awarded damages accordingly. While Mr. Boucher maintained that he was proceeding along the highway at approximately 20 to 25 miles per hour, the trial justice rejected this testimony. In doing so, he relied upon a police report which indicated that skid marks at the scene revealed that the vehicle traveled at least 40 feet before it came to a halt. In this appeal, the Bouchers claim that the trial justice erred in relying on the skid-mark testimony “because there was no evidence that the vehicle stopped immediately upon impact.”

On December 4, 1979, the Bouchers, through counsel, appeared before us in response to our order to show cause why their appeal should not be summarily dismissed in light *907of the fact that Mr. Boucher’s testimony refutes the contention now made on appeal. The transcript indicates that when the trial justice asked Mr. Boucher if his vehicle continued on after impact, he replied, “No, it didn’t.” The trial justice then followed up this response by inquiring if the “vehicle stopped immediately”; Mr. Boucher answered in the affirmative. At the show cause hearing, the defendants were at a loss to explain the exchange that took place between the trial justice and the defendant operator.

*Albert Elliot Sarkisian,*for plaintiff, *John F. McBurney,*for defendants.

Consequently, no cause having been shown, the defendants’ appeal is denied and dismissed, the judgment appealed from is affirmed, and the case is remanded to the Superior Court.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

AARON C. PORTER,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 4:20cv230-MW/HTC

MARK S. INCH, et al,

Defendants.

_________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and 

Recommendation, ECF No. 7, and has also reviewed de novo Plaintiff’s Objections 

to Report and Recommendation and Combined Motion for Leave to Amend and File 

Supplemental Complaint. ECF No. 9. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted, over Plaintiff’s

objections, as this Court’s opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, 

“Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2, is DENIED. 

Plaintiff’s motion for leave to supplement his complaint, ECF No. 6, is 

DENIED as futile. Plaintiff’s combined motion for leave to amend and file 

supplemental complaint, ECF No. 9, is DENIED. This action is DISMISSED 

Case 4:20-cv-00230-MW-HTC Document 10 Filed 07/16/20 Page 1 of 2
2

without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).” The Clerk shall also close the file. 

SO ORDERED on July 15, 2020.

s/ MARK E. WALKER

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00230-MW-HTC Document 10 Filed 07/16/20 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2353 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 Union Calendar No. 117
113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2353

                          [Report No. 113-162]

To amend title 23, United States Code, with respect to the operation of 
    vehicles on certain Wisconsin highways, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 13, 2013

 Mr. Petri (for himself and Mr. Ribble) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

                             July 22, 2013

 Additional sponsors: Mr. Kind, Mr. Ryan of Wisconsin, Ms. Moore, Mr. 
                          Duffy, and Mr. Pocan

                             July 22, 2013

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 23, United States Code, with respect to the operation of 
    vehicles on certain Wisconsin highways, and for other purposes.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OPERATION OF VEHICLES ON CERTAIN WISCONSIN HIGHWAYS.

    Section 127 of title 23, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(j) Operation of Vehicles on Certain Wisconsin Highways.--If any 
segment of the United States Route 41 corridor, as described in section 
1105(c)(57) of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 
1991, is designated as a route on the Interstate System, a vehicle that 
could operate legally on that segment before the date of such 
designation may continue to operate on that segment, without regard to 
any requirement under subsection (a).''.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 117

113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2353

                          [Report No. 113-162]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To amend title 23, United States Code, with respect to the operation of 
    vehicles on certain Wisconsin highways, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 22, 2013

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
#### § 3200.10 Disposal.

Once the requirements in § 3200.9 are met for retention and use of property by the Institution and title is transferred, Federal excess personal property (FEPP) no longer needed by an Institution will be disposed of in accordance with the Institution's disposal practices. Regardless of ownership, FEPP must never be disposed of in any manner which is detrimental or dangerous to public health or safety. Also, any costs incurred during the disposal process are the responsibility of the Institution.

[68 FR 75108, Dec. 30, 2003]
#### § 29.2632 Rule 16.

Any lot of tobacco of the B, C, or X groups containing over 30 percent of mixed color or variegated leaves or over 30 percent of mixed color and variegated leaves combined shall be classified as “mixed” and designated by the color symbol “M.”