alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 301.74-3 Quarantined areas. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the Administrator will list as a quarantined area each State, or each portion of a State, in which plum pox has been detected through inspection and laboratory testing, or in which the Administrator has reason to believe that plum pox is present, or that the Administrator considers necessary to quarantine because of its inseparability for quarantine enforcement purposes from localities in which plum pox has been detected. The Administrator will publish a list of all quarantined areas (the quarantine list) on the PPQ website at *www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/planthealth/plant-pest-and-disease-programs/pests-and-diseases/plum-pox/plumpox .* The list will include the date that the list was last updated. Lists of all quarantined areas may also be obtained by request from any local PPQ office; local offices are listed in telephone directories and on the internet at *www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/planthealth/ppq-program-overview/sphd .* After a change is made to the list of quarantined areas, APHIS will publish a notice in the Federal Register informing the public that the change has occurred and describing the change to the quarantined areas. Less than an entire State will be designated as a quarantined area only if the Administrator determines that: ( 1 ) The State has adopted and is enforcing restrictions on the intrastate movement of regulated articles that are equivalent to those imposed by this subpart on the interstate movement of regulated articles; and
( 2 ) The designation of less than an entire State as a quarantined area will be adequate to prevent the interstate spread of plum pox.
( b ) The Administrator or an inspector may temporarily designate any nonquarantined area in a State as a quarantined area in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section. The Administrator will give a copy of this subpart along with a written notice for the temporary designation to the owner or person in possession of the nonquarantined area. Thereafter, the interstate movement of any regulated article from an area temporarily designated as a quarantined area will be subject to this subpart. As soon as practicable, this area will be added to the quarantine list or the designation will be terminated by the Administrator or an inspector. The owner or person in possession of an area for which the quarantine designation is terminated will be given notice of the termination as soon as practicable.
[87 FR 80008, Dec. 29, 2022]
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

July 18, 2011

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with GM on May 9, 2011

FROM: Don Kopinski

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0162

This memorandum documents a meeting held on May 9, 2011 between GM and EPA staff. The 

following people attended:

GM: Barbara Kiss

EPA: Angela Cullen, Chuck Moulis, Byron Bunker, Cle Jackson, Don Kopinski

The discussion focused on gasoline engine feasibility for the HD GHG rule.
#### § 33.6 Package.

*Package* means any container of apples.
Brent Rouse 

Indiana Aerial Solutions LLC 

5112 East Range Road 

Shelbyville, IN 46176 

June 23, 2015 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

I am writing to you today to check on the status of a Section 333 Exemption request 

made by myself on behalf oflndiana Aerial Solutions LLC. According to regulations.gov 

it has been assigned a docket ID ofFAA-2015-0357. In reviewing the status of approved 

exemptions, it appears that applications submitted after mine are being approved. I am 

curious if you require additional information from me so that a decision can be made. I 

would greatly appreciate any update you can provide. I can be reached via the mailing 

address listed above or can be reached at 317-512-1225. 

Sincerely, 

~-"~~ 

Brent Rouse 

Owner
Exhibit 10.60





                                                     February 25, 2005

Marijn E. Dekkers
President and CEO
Thermo Electron Corporation
81 Wyman Street
Waltham, MA 02454

Dear Marijn:

         This letter confirms our agreement as to the following:

         1. That the second sentence of Section 6(c) of your Amended & Restated
Employment Agreement is modified to read as follows:

                  "The exercise price of the Subsequent Stock Options shall be
                  the average of the opening and closing prices of the Stock on
                  the New York Stock Exchange on the date of each grant."

         2. That the stock option to purchase 260,000 shares of the Company's
common stock granted in 2005 pursuant to Section 6(c) of your Amended & Restated
Employment Agreement shall be exercisable for a period of 7 years from the date
of grant rather than for a period of 10 years as provided in the last sentence
of Section 6(c).

                                                     Very truly yours,


                                                     /s/ Elaine S. Ullian
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Elaine S. Ullian
                                                     Chair
                                                     Thermo Electron Corporation
                                                     Compensation Committee


ACCEPTED AND AGREED:


By:   /s/ Marijn E. Dekkers
      ---------------------------
      Marijn E. Dekkers
exv10w26



 



Exhibit 10.26




AMENDMENT #6 TO SATELLITE SERVICE AGREEMENT




     THIS AMENDMENT #6 (“Amendment #6”) to the Satellite Service Agreement effective as of March
21, 2003, as amended by Amendment #1 effective as of July 10, 2003, Amendment #3 effective as of
February 19, 2004, Amendment #4 effective as of November 19, 2004, and Amendment #5 effective as of
November 19, 2004 (collectively the “Original Agreement”), between SES Americom, Inc., as agent for
SES Americom California, Inc. (for the period prior to the In-Service Date) and SES Americom
Colorado, Inc. (for the period on and after the In-Service Date), on the one hand, and EchoStar
Satellite L.L.C. (“Customer”) *** is made effective as of December 20, 2004 (the “Amendment #6
Effective Date”). All references to “SES Americom” herein shall include SES Americom California,
Inc., SES Americom Colorado, Inc., and SES Americom, Inc. as agent for each. Defined terms used in
this Amendment #6 have the meanings specified herein or in the Original Agreement. The Original
Agreement as amended by this Amendment #6 is referred to as the “Agreement”.



     SES Americom and Customer agree to amend the Original Agreement in accordance with the terms
and conditions set forth below. ***



(3)    General. Except as expressly modified herein, the Original Agreement shall remain in
full force and effect in accordance with its terms and conditions.



     This Amendment #6 contains the complete and exclusive understanding of the parties with
respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior negotiations and agreements between
the parties with respect thereto.






	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	ECHOSTAR SATELLITE L.L.C.
 

By: EchoStar DBS Corporation, its

sole member	 	SES AMERICOM, INC., as agent for 

SES AMERICOM CALIFORNIA, INC. and

SES AMERICOM COLORADO, INC.
	 

	By:

	 	 	 	By:	 	 	 
	

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	(Signature)	 	(Signature)
	 
	 
	Name:

	 	 	 	Name:	 	 	 
	

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	(Typed or Printed Name)	 	(Typed or Printed Name)
	 
	 
	Title:

	 	 	 	Title:	 	 	 
	

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 








***




-1-



***Certain confidential portions of this exhibit were omitted by means of redacting a portion of the text. Copies of the exhibit containing the redacted portions have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission subject to a request for confidential treatment pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.3

                       American International Group, Inc.
                                 70 Pine Street
                               New York, NY 10270


                                                March 16, 2005


Mr. Steven J. Bensinger
c/o American International Group, Inc.
70 Pine Street
New York, NY 10270

Dear Mr. Bensinger:

                  The Board of Directors of American International Group, Inc.
(the "Corporation" or "AIG"), hereby appoints you, and you hereby accept
appointment as, Chief Financial Officer of AIG, with all of the duties and
authorities of chief financial officer, reporting directly to the Chief
Executive Officer.

                  The Board of Directors will cooperate fully with you to
facilitate a smooth transition to your new position and we shall make available
to you the full resources of the Corporation to assist in that regard. In
consideration of your agreeing to serve in this capacity and without limiting
any pre-existing rights that you may otherwise have, we hereby confirm that you
shall continue to be indemnified to the fullest extent permitted by law for all
actions or omissions taken by you in your service to AIG, or any of its
affiliated entities for which you perform services at the request of AIG, both
prior to the date hereof and at any future time. These rights to indemnification
shall be a contractual right that cannot be terminated or amended in any respect
without your prior written consent. You shall also have the benefit of
continuing directors' and officers' insurance coverage at levels no less
favorable than those in effect from time to time for the members of the Board of
Directors and AIG's senior management.

                  In further consideration of your accepting this position, the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors hereby agrees to work with you
to develop a comprehensive three year employment agreement containing terms
appropriately suited to the chief financial officer of the Corporation,
including provisions with respect to base salary, bonus, severance in the event
of a termination by AIG without cause or by you with good reason, long-term
incentives, retirement and stock-based compensation features, as well as
customary intellectual property protections and post-employment restrictive
covenants and taking into account your total compensation from all sources in
connection with your services to AIG. The Compensation Committee shall endeavor
to finalize these employment terms within a 21 day period from today.


<PAGE>

Mr. Steven J. Bensinger
March 16, 2005
Page 2


                  In the event of your termination without cause, or by you
following a material breach of this letter by AIG, you will be entitled to a
severance payment of $5 million.

                  We look forward to a prosperous future for AIG under the new
management team and pledge our full cooperation and support to you in all future
endeavors.

                                                Sincerely,



                                                /s/ Marshall A. Cohen
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 22

- 00307

- CV

IN RE GEORGE BERGIN

Original Proceeding

From the 414th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2022

- 2156

- 5

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator George Bergin’s petition for writ of mandamus filed on September 21,

2022

, is denied.

STEVE SMITH

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Johnson,

and Justice Smith,

Petition denied

Opinion delivered and filed November 9, 2022

[OT06 ]
#### The State ex rel. Gencorp Polymer Products, Appellee, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio; Brandon, Appellant.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Gencorp Polymer Products v. Indus. Comm.*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 356.]

(No. 97-2366

Submitted August 19, 1998

Decided October 14, 1998.)

*Thompson, Hiñe & Flory, L.L.P.,*and *Robert W. Myers,*for appellee.

*Stewart Jajfy & Associates Co., L.P.A., Stewart R. Jajfy*and *Marc J. Jajfy,*for appellant.

*357The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the order of the Industrial Commission is reinstated.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
#### § 1786.26 Policy.

It is the policy of RUS to facilitate the prepayment of FFB loans in accordance with the provisions of section 306(A) of the RE Act and section 633 of the continuing resolution as modified by section 637 of the 1989 Appropriations Act. Furthermore, consistent with the RE Act, the continuing resolution and the 1989 Appropriations Act, it is the policy of RUS to implement the objectives of the prepayment program in a manner which does not result in an increase in loan guarantee risk or an inappropriate increase in the administrative burden on RUS.
December 5, 1996 

       Securities and Exchange Commission 
       450 Fifth Street, N.W. 
       Washington, D.C. 20549 

            Re:  Vitro Diagnostics, Inc. 
                    Form 10-KSB for the year ending October 31, 1994 
                    SEC file no.  0-17378 

       Dear Sir or Madam:

       Transmitted herewith through the EDGAR system is Form 10-KSB for 
he fiscal year ended October 31, 1995 for Vitro Diagnostics, Inc.  Should 
you have any questions or comments concerning this matter please contact 
the undersigned at the 303-794-2000.



       Sincerely, 



       Roger Hurst 
       President 


<PAGE>                                                                       32
#### § 319.15a Administrative instructions and interpretation relating to entry into Guam of bagasse and related sugarcane products.

Bagasse and related sugarcane products have been so processed that, in the judgment of the Department, their importation into Guam will involve no pest risk, and they may be imported into Guam without further permit, other than the authorization contained in this paragraph. Such importations may be made without the submission of a notice of arrival inasmuch as there is available to the inspector the essential information normally supplied by the importer at the time of importation. Inspection of such importations may be made under the general authority of § 330.105(a) of this chapter. If an importation is found infected, infested, or contaminated with any plant pest and is not subject to disposal under this part, disposition may be made in accordance with § 330.106 of this chapter.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2105 

To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 

to extend the pilot program for the temporary exchange of information 

technology personnel. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 22, 2013 

Mr. KILMER (for himself and Mr. BRIDENSTINE) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2010 to extend the pilot program for the temporary 

exchange of information technology personnel. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Information Tech5 nology Exchange Program Act of 2013’’ or the ‘‘ITEP 

6 Act of 2013’’. 

7 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF EXCHANGE PROGRAM. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1110(d) of the National 

9 Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (5 U.S.C. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2105 IH

1 3702 note) is amended by striking ‘‘2013’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘2023’’. 

3 (b) REPORTING REQUIREMENT.—Section 1110(i) of 

4 such Act is amended by striking ‘‘2015,’’ and inserting 

5 ‘‘2024,’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[106th Congress Public Law 209]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ209.106]

[[Page 114 STAT. 320]]

Public Law 106-209
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
9308 South Chicago Avenue, Chicago, Illinois, as the ``John J. Buchanan 
     Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: May 26, 2000 -  [H.R. 1377]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service, located at 9308 
South Chicago Avenue, Chicago, Illinois, 60617, is designated as the 
``John J. Buchanan Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, regulation, map, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be considered to be a reference to the ``John J. Buchanan Post 
Office Building''.

    Approved May 26, 2000.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1377:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 145 (1999):
                                    May 24, considered and passed House.
                                    Nov. 19, considered and passed 
                                        Senate, amended.
                                                        Vol. 146 (2000):
                                    May 15, House concurred in Senate 
                                        amendments.

                                  <all>
```
§ 301.75-7 Interstate movement of regulated fruit from a quarantined area. ( a ) Regulated fruit produced in a quarantined area or moved into a quarantined area for packing may be moved interstate with a certificate issued and attached in accordance with § 301.75-12 if all of the following conditions are met: ( 1 ) The regulated fruit was packed in a commercial packinghouse whose owner or operator has entered into a compliance agreement with APHIS in accordance with § 301.75-13.
( 2 ) The regulated fruit was treated in accordance with part 305 of this chapter.
( 3 ) The regulated fruit is free of leaves, twigs, and other plant parts, except for stems that are less than 1 inch long and attached to the fruit.
( 4 ) If the fruit is repackaged after being packed in a commercial packinghouse and before it is moved interstate from the quarantined area, the person that repackages the fruit must enter into a compliance agreement with APHIS in accordance with § 301.75-13 and issue and attach a certificate for the interstate movement of the fruit in accordance with § 301.75-12.
( b ) Regulated fruit that is not eligible for movement under paragraph (a) of this section may be moved interstate only for immediate export. The regulated fruit must be accompanied by a limited permit issued in accordance with § 301.75-12 and must be moved in a container sealed by APHIS directly to the port of export in accordance with the conditions of the limited permit.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0363) [74 FR 54444, Oct. 22, 2009, as amended at 75 FR 4240, Jan. 26, 2010; 88 FR 85470, Dec. 8, 2023]
#### Judith Czachorowski, an Infant, by Her Guardian ad Litem, Chester Czachorowski, Appellant, et al., Plaintiff, v. Murray Weintraub, Respondent.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal and property injuries, etc., plaintiff Judith Czaohorowski (changed to Griffiths) appeals from a judgment of the ¡Supreme -Court, Suffolk County, entered July 16, 1968, which dismissed the complaint upon the decision of the court at the close of plaintiff’s ease upon a jury trial. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted as to appellant, with costs to abide the event. No questions of fact were considered. In our opinion, whether' appellant was contributorily negligent raised an issue for the jury’s determination and, therefore, her complaint should not have been -dismissed at the close of her case. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hopkins, Benjamin and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
Summary of 2005 Executive Compensation Plan



 EXHIBIT 10.17 
  
 SUMMARY OF 2005 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN 
  
 The Company’s 2005 executive bonus plan, as approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, provides
for different target bonus amounts for each of the Company’s executive officers, using a percentage of base pay derived from third-party compensation survey data for comparable companies and executive positions. 
  
 The total bonus is comprised of three major components: 
  

			
	- Executive’s personal qualitative performance appraisal	  	20% of target
		
	- Company’s quantitative financial performance	  	40% of target
		
	- Executive’s achievement of strategic goals	  	40% of target

  

	 	•	 	The qualitative personal performance appraisal is paid annually based upon the executive officer’s accomplishment of qualitative goals that are established by the executive
officer’s manager. 

  

	 	•	 	The plan provides for a graduated scale of payment for the 40% of target that is based on quantitative performance, so that an executive officer may earn no quantitative bonus, a
fraction of his or her target, or up to 200% of the quantitative part of the target, depending upon the financial performance of the Company. Quantitative financial performance bonuses are based upon a combination of earnings and revenue achievement
against targets for the Company as a whole. Results are generally weighted more heavily on earnings than revenue. 

  

	 	•	 	For the achievement of strategic goals component of the bonus, the potential amount to be earned is entirely funded by the financial performance of the business, as described in the
preceding paragraph. The amount earned by the executive officer is based upon the executive officer’s performance against strategic goals that are approved by the Compensation Committee. 

  
 For the first three fiscal quarters of 2005, the plan will be administered by
the Company, and the applicable bonus payable for the quantitative financial performance with respect to each of these quarter’s results will be paid following the completion of the quarter. The applicable bonus payable with respect to the
fourth quarter and year end quantitative financial performance as well as the executive’s personal qualitative performance appraisal achievement of strategic goals will be approved by the Compensation Committee and paid following the end of the
Company’s fiscal year. 
  
 The salaries of our named
executive officers are effective as of January 1, 2005. 
  

						
	 Name of Executive Officer

	  	2005 Base
Salary

	  	2005 Bonus Target as
Percent of Salary


	 Paul Tobin
	  	$	216,000	  	50%
	 E. Y. Snowden
	  	$	366,000	  	70%
	 Karen A. Walker
	  	$	229,600	  	45%
	 William Wessman
	  	$	229,000	  	45%
	 Fritz von Mering
	  	$	198,400	  	45%
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO.: 4:02cr45-SPM

DARRON MARSHALL,

Defendant.

____________________________/

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO MODIFY UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 3582

This cause comes before the Court on Defendant’s motion (doc. 411) to

modify sentence under the retroactive crack cocaine amendment (Amendment

750) and 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). The Government filed a response in opposition

(doc. 412).

Upon review, the Court finds that Defendant is not entitled to a sentence

reduction because application of the guideline amendment results in no change

to his sentencing range. Defendant was subject to a statutory mandatory

minimum sentence, which also determined his sentencing range. Because

Defendant’s sentencing range remains the same under the amended guidelines,

he is not eligible for a reduction. Accordingly, it is 

Case 4:02-cr-00045-SPM Document 413 Filed 02/13/12 Page 1 of 2
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the motion to modify sentence (doc.

411) is denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 13th day of February, 2012.

S/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

Senior United States District Judge

2

Case 4:02-cr-00045-SPM Document 413 Filed 02/13/12 Page 2 of 2