Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 84 / Friday, May 1, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 24821 

Federal Register for publication 

electronically as an official document of 

the Department of Veterans Affairs. Jose 

D. Riojas, Chief of Staff, Department of 

Veterans Affairs, approved this 

document on April 24, 2015, for 

publication. 

List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 63 

Administrative practice and 

procedure, Day care, Disability benefits, 

Government contracts, Health care, 

Homeless, Housing, Individuals with 

disabilities, Low and moderate income 

housing, Public assistance programs, 

Public housing, Relocation assistance, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Veterans. 

Dated: April 27, 2015. 

William F. Russo, 

Acting Director, Office of Regulation Policy 

& Management, Office of the General Counsel, 

Department of Veterans Affairs. 

For the reasons set forth in the 

preamble, VA amends 38 CFR part 63 as 

follows: 

PART 63—HEALTH CARE FOR 

HOMELESS VETERANS (HCHV) 

PROGRAM 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 63 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 2031, and as 

noted in specific sections. 

■ 2. Revise § 63.1 to read as follows: 

§ 63.1 Purpose and scope. 

This part implements the Health Care 

for Homeless Veterans (HCHV) program. 

This program provides per diem 

payments to non-VA community-based 

facilities that provide housing, outreach 

services, case management services, and 

rehabilitative services, and may provide 

care and/or treatment to all eligible 

homeless veterans. 

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 2031(a)(2)) 

■ 3. Amend § 63.2 by: 

■ a. Adding the definition ‘‘Case 

management’’ in alphabetical order. 

■ b. Revising the definitions of 

‘‘Homeless’’ and ‘‘Non-VA communitybased provider’’. 

■ c. Removing the definitions of 

‘‘Serious mental illness’’ and 

‘‘Substance use disorder’’. 

■ d. Revising the authority citation at 

the end of the section. 

The addition and revisions read as 

follows: 

§ 63.2 Definitions. 

* * * * * 

Case management means arranging, 

coordinating, or providing direct 

clinical services and support; referring 

and providing linkage to VA and nonVA resources, providing crisis 

management services and monitoring; 

and intervening and advocating on 

behalf of veterans to support 

transportation, credit, legal, and other 

needs. 

* * * * * 

Homeless has the meaning given that 

term in paragraphs (1) through (3) of the 

definition of homeless in 24 CFR 576.2. 

Non-VA community-based provider 

means a facility in a community that 

provides temporary, short-term housing 

(generally up to 6 months) for the 

homeless, as well as community 

outreach, case management, and 

rehabilitative services, and, as needed, 

basic mental health services. 

* * * * * 

(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 2002, 2031) 

■ 4. Amend § 63.3 by revising paragraph 

(a) to read as follows: 

§ 63.3 Eligible Veterans. 

(a) Eligibility. In order to serve as the 

basis for a per diem payment through 

the HCHV program, a veteran served by 

the non-VA community-based provider 

must be: 

(1) Enrolled in the VA health care 

system, or eligible for VA health care 

under 38 CFR 17.36 or 17.37; and 

(2) Homeless. 

* * * * * 

§ 63.10 [Amended] 

■ 5. Amend § 63.10 by revising 

paragraph (a) to read as follows: 

(a) Who can apply. VA may award per 

diem contracts to non-VA communitybased providers who provide temporary 

residential assistance homeless persons, 

including but not limited to persons 

with serious mental illness, and who 

can provide the specific services and 

meet the standards identified in § 63.15 

and elsewhere in this part. 

* * * * * 

■ 6. Amend § 63.15 by revising 

paragraph (b) to read as follows: 

§ 63.15 Duties of, and standards 

applicable to, non-VA community-based 

providers. 

* * * * * 

(b) Treatment plans, therapeutic/

rehabilitative services, and case 

management. Individualized treatment 

plans are to be developed through a 

joint effort of the veteran, non-VA 

community-based provider staff, and 

VA clinical staff. Therapeutic and 

rehabilitative services, as well as case 

management and outreach services, 

must be provided by the non-VA 

community-based provider as described 

in the treatment plan. In some cases, VA 

may complement the non-VA 

community-based provider’s program 

with added treatment or other services, 

such as participation in VA outpatient 

programs or counseling. In addition to 

case management services, for example, 

to coordinate or address relevant issues 

related to a veteran’s homelessness and 

health as identified in the individual 

treatment plan, services provided by the 

non-VA community-based provider 

should generally include, as 

appropriate: 

(1) Structured group activities such as 

group therapy, social skills training, 

self-help group meetings, or peer 

counseling. 

(2) Professional counseling, including 

counseling on self-care skills, adaptive 

coping skills, and, as appropriate, 

vocational rehabilitation counseling, in 

collaboration with VA programs and 

community resources. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2015–10150 Filed 4–30–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8320–01–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2015–0087; FRL–9926–77– 

Region 9] 

Approval of Air Quality Implementation 

Plans; California; South Coast Air 

Quality Management District; 

Stationary Source Permits 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is taking final action to 

approve Rule 1325, Federal PM2.5 New 

Source Review Program, into the South 

Coast Air Quality Management District 

(SCAQMD) portion of the California 

State Implementation Plan (SIP). This 

action was proposed in the Federal 

Register on February 17, 2015. Rule 

1325 governs the issuance of permits for 

major stationary sources and major 

modifications located in areas 

designated as nonattainment for the 

PM2.5 NAAQS to meet Clean Air Act 

Part D requirements for emissions of 

PM2.5 and PM2.5 precursors. EPA is 

taking this action under the Clean Air 

Act obligation to take action on State 

submittals for inclusion in state 

implementation plans. The intended 

effect is to update the SIP with 

nonattainment new source review 

(NNSR) rules for major stationary 

sources and major modifications 

emitting PM2.5 and certain PM2.5

precursors. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

24822 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 84 / Friday, May 1, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

1Health Advocates consists of Communities for a 

Better Environment, Physicians for Social 

Responsibility-Los Angeles, and Sierra Club My 

Generation Campaign. 

2 Draft Supplement to the 24-Hour PM2.5 State 

Implementation Plan for the South Coast Air Basin 

dated January 2015 at E–1. 

DATES: This rule is effective on June 1, 

2015. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket 

number [EPA–R09–OAR–2015–0087] 

for this action. Generally, documents in 

the docket for this action are available 

electronically at http://

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, 

San Francisco, California 94105–3901. 

While all documents in the docket are 

listed at http://www.regulations.gov, 

some information may be publicly 

available only at the hard copy location 

(e.g., copyrighted material, large maps, 

multi-volume reports), and some may 

not be available in either location (e.g., 

confidential business information 

(CBI)). To inspect the hard copy 

materials, please schedule an 

appointment during normal business 

hours with the contact listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Laura Yannayon, EPA Region IX, by 

phone: (415) 972–3534 or by email at 

yannayon.laura@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document, the terms 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. 

Table of Contents 

I. Proposed Action 

II. Public Comment 

III. EPA Action and Response to Health 

Advocates Comment 

IV. Incorporation by Reference 

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. Proposed Action 

On February 17, 2015 (80 FR 8250), 

EPA proposed approval of South Coast 

Air Quality Management District 

(SCAQMD) Rule 1325, Federal PM2.5

New Source Review Program, for 

inclusion in the California SIP. Rule 

1325 was adopted by SCAQMD on 

December 5, 2014, and submitted by the 

California Air Resources Board on 

December 29, 2014. 

II. Public Comment 

EPA’s proposed action provided a 30- 

day public comment period. During this 

time we received two comments. Only 

one of the comments, submitted by 

Earthjustice on behalf of Health 

Advocates 1, objected to our proposed 

approval of SCAQMD Rule 1325. 

III. EPA Action and Response to Health 

Advocates Comment 

The letter submitted on behalf of 

Health Advocates objected to EPA’s 

proposed approval of Rule 1325 on 

three grounds. Below we provide a 

summary of our response to each of 

Health Advocates’ comments. Please see 

the Response to Comments document in 

the docket for this final action for our 

complete response. 

1. Approval of exclusion of ammonia 

as a precursor. 

CAA subpart 4 includes section 

189(e), which requires NNSR controls 

for major stationary sources of PM10

precursors, and hence PM2.5 precursors, 

‘‘except where the Administrator 

determines that such sources do not 

contribute significantly to PM10 levels 

which exceed the standard in the area.’’ 

CAA section 189(e) (Emphasis added). 

EPA has identified ammonia as a 

precursor to the formation of PM2.5. See 

generally 80 FR 15340, 15352 (Mar, 23, 

2015) (Proposed PM2.5 Implementation 

Rule). EPA proposed to approve Rule 

1325 even though it does not contain 

NNSR requirements for ammonia 

emissions because SCAQMD provided 

information that demonstrates major 

stationary sources of ammonia 

emissions do not contribute 

significantly to PM2.5 levels exceeding 

the PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality 

Standard (NAAQS) in the South Coast 

Air Basin nonattainment area. 80 FR at 

8251. 

Health Advocates disagreed with our 

proposal on three grounds, asserting 

that (1) EPA’s determination that a 

contribution of 1.7 tons per day (tpd) of 

ammonia emissions to the ammonia 

inventory is small is ‘‘unjustified’’; (2) 

EPA has not demonstrated that 

ammonia emissions do not contribute 

significantly to PM2.5 NAAQS violations 

in the South Coast Air Basin; and (3) it 

was arbitrary and capricious for EPA to 

consider the trends and actual air 

quality of PM2.5 in the area. Earthjustice 

Letter at p.3. 

EPA disagrees with these comments. 

EPA applied a weight of the evidence 

approach taking into account several 

factors to determine if SCAQMD 

appropriately determined that major 

stationary sources of ammonia 

emissions do not contribute 

significantly to PM2.5 nonattainment in 

the area. 

One factor we considered is that there 

are only four existing major stationary 

sources of ammonia and these four 

sources’ emissions are only a small 

percentage (1.7%) of the total ammonia 

inventory for the South Coast PM2.5

nonattainment area. Health Advocates 

did not submit any information or 

provide an explanation to show that 

1.7% is not a small percentage. Health 

Advocates did not indicate what 

percentage would be justified as being 

small. For reasons explained fully in our 

Response to Comments, EPA continues 

to consider the 1.7% contribution of 

ammonia emissions from the four 

existing stationary sources to be 

relatively small compared to the rest of 

the ammonia inventory. 

A second factor we considered is 

whether major stationary sources of 

ammonia contribute significantly to 

levels exceeding the PM2.5 NAAQS in 

the area, and whether potential new 

major stationary sources would be 

expected to contribute significantly to 

levels exceeding the PM2.5 NAAQS in 

the area. The SCAQMD provided 

information showing that a regional 

increase of 10 tpd of ammonia (more 

than five times the amount currently 

emitted by all major stationary sources) 

would result in a 0.22 microgram per 

cubic meter (mg/m3) increase in annual 

PM2.5 concentrations. This estimated 

increase in annual PM2.5 concentration 

would be 1.5% of the 15 mg/m3 1997 

PM2.5 annual standard. SCAQMD 

submitted additional information 

showing that decreasing ammonia 

emissions by 2.9 tpd near the Mira 

Loma monitor would result in a 

reduction of 0.16 mg/m3 at that 

monitor.2 This estimated increase in 24- 

hr PM2.5 concentration would be 0.46% 

of the 35 mg/m3 1997 PM2.5 24-hr 

standard. Based on these data, one can 

reasonably conclude that the current 

ambient contribution (in mg/m3) of the 

four existing major stationary sources 

(with emissions of 1.7 tpd) and the 

ambient contributions from a new major 

source, to PM2.5 levels that exceed the 

standard are likely to be less than the 

estimated changes in PM2.5

concentrations indicated in the analyses 

cited above (which evaluated emission 

changes of 10 tpd and 2.9 tpd, 

respectively). Thus, EPA determined 

that existing and new major stationary 

sources of ammonia would make a 

relatively minor contribution to levels 

exceeding the 1997 or 2006 PM2.5

NAAQS in the area. 

A third factor we considered was the 

progress the SCAQMD has made and the 

overall severity of the PM2.5

nonattainment problem in the South 

Coast Air Basin. Health Advocates 

contends it was arbitrary and capricious 

to consider the past progress and 

current air quality and asserts that our 

evaluation of the air quality is flawed. 

We disagree with both points. EPA’s 

General Preamble in 1992 noted that 

determinations under CAA section 

189(e) are case-by-case and depend on 

a variety of information that is specific 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 84 / Friday, May 1, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 24823 

3SCAQMD Regulation XIII establishes the NNSR 

program requirements for VOC emissions from 

stationary sources. Rule 1303 references other 

SCAQMD rules in Regulation XIII. Our citation to 

Rule 1303 also includes any other provisions in 

Regulation XIII as applicable. 

4Section 189(e) of the CAA states that ‘‘[t]he 

control requirements applicable under plans in 

effect under this part for major stationary sources 

of PM10 shall also apply to major stationary sources 

of PM10 precursors,’’ except where the 

Administrator makes specific findings. 

5As noted above, major stationary sources of VOC 

emissions are regulated pursuant to a different, 

more stringent NNSR rule (Rule 1303) rather than 

Rule 1325. 

to the area. See 57 FR 13498, 13538–42 

(April 16, 1992). EPA’s proposed PM2.5

Implementation Rule recently reiterated 

that application of section 189(e) should 

be case-specific and focused on 

location, including a weight of the 

evidence approach considering, among 

other factors, the severity of the 

nonattainment problem in the area. 80 

FR at 15359. Therefore, it is appropriate 

to consider this factor. 

Health Advocates also asserted that 

EPA’s discussion of the air quality in 

the South Coast Air Basin was 

misleading, contending that there were 

violations of both the 1997 and 2006 

PM2.5 NAAQS. Earthjustice Letter at p. 

3–4. EPA acknowledges one monitor 

(Mira Loma) has recorded PM2.5

emissions exceeding the level of the 

2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS based on 

2011–2013 air quality data. However, 

Health Advocates failed to provide any 

information to support its claims that 

there are any current violations of the 

1997 PM2.5 NAAQS. The information 

Health Advocates cited to support its 

allegations of additional violations of 

the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS at the Mira 

Loma monitor is from a combination of 

both federal and non-federal reference 

method monitors. In in addition the 

data is preliminary, uncertified and has 

not been quality assured. 

Based on the weight of the evidence, 

EPA concludes that it was appropriate 

for SCAQMD to exclude ammonia as a 

precursor pursuant to CAA section 

189(e). 

2. Regulation of VOCs by SCAQMD 

NNSR Rule 1303 rather than Rule 1325. 

Health Advocates also disagreed with 

EPA’s proposal to approve Rule 1325 

without requiring VOC emissions to be 

included in the Rule’s requirements. Id 

at p. 4. Health Advocates contends our 

proposal is inconsistent with CAA 

section 189(e). 

EPA did not propose to determine 

that VOCs do not contribute 

significantly to PM2.5 levels that exceed 

the PM2.5 standards and is making no 

such finding in this final rule. Instead, 

consistent with the proposed rule, EPA 

is determining that the NNSR control 

requirements applicable under the 

SCAQMD SIP for major stationary 

sources of PM2.5 also apply to major 

stationary sources of VOCs (which are 

PM2.5 precursors), because major VOC 

sources are currently subject to stringent 

NNSR control requirements under Rule 

1303. The requirements in Rule 1303 3

are more stringent than those that would 

apply under Rule 1325 and fully satisfy 

the control requirements of CAA section 

189(e) with respect to VOCs.4 Moreover, 

it is long-standing EPA policy to allow 

NNSR regulation of PM precursors via 

their regulation through other NNSR 

programs. 57 FR at 13542 (‘‘The VOC 

reductions may also be realized from 

new or modified major stationary 

sources due to the implementation of 

NSR programs in ozone nonattainment 

or attainment areas’’). 

We continue to find that the NNSR 

regulation of VOC emissions pursuant to 

Rule 1303 rather than Rule 1325 

satisfies the requirements of section 

189(e). 

3. Consideration of attainment of the 

PM2.5 NAAQS. 

Finally, Health Advocates contends 

that EPA cannot approve Rule 1325 

because the South Coast Air Basin has 

not demonstrated the area is in 

attainment with the 1997 and 2006 

PM2.5 NAAQS. Earthjustice Letter at p. 

5. 

There is no requirement for the area 

to have attained the PM2.5 NAAQS as a 

predicate for EPA to approve a new 

NNSR rule for PM2.5. Approval of a new 

NNSR rule to control emissions of 

PM2.5, including NOX, SO2 and VOCs 5

emissions as precursors, in no way 

interferes with the SCAQMD’s progress 

towards attaining the 1997 and 2006 

PM2.5 NAAQS. 

No comments were submitted to 

change our assessment of Rule 1325 as 

described in our proposed action. 

Pursuant to section 110(k) of the CAA 

and for the reasons provided in our 

proposed action, associated TSD and 

detailed Response to Comments 

document included in the docket, EPA 

is finalizing approval of SCAQMD Rule 

1325. 

IV. Incorporation by Reference 

In this rule, the EPA is finalizing 

regulatory text that includes 

incorporation by reference. In 

accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 

51.5, the EPA is finalizing the 

incorporation by reference of the 

SCAQMD rules described in the 

amendments to 40 CFR 52.220 set forth 

below. The EPA has made, and will 

continue to make, these documents 

available electronically through 

www.regulations.gov and in hard copy 

at the appropriate EPA office (see the 

ADDRESSES section of this preamble for 

more information). 

V. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the Clean Air Act, the 

Administrator is required to approve a 

SIP submission that complies with the 

provisions of the Act and applicable 

Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 

40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP 

submissions, EPA’s role is to approve 

State choices, provided that they meet 

the criteria of the Clean Air Act. 

Accordingly, this action merely 

approves State law as meeting Federal 

requirements and does not impose 

additional requirements beyond those 

imposed by state law. For that reason, 

this action: 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to review by the Office of 

Management and Budget under 

Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011); 

• does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; 

and 

• does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, the SIP is not approved to 

apply on any Indian reservation land or 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

24824 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 84 / Friday, May 1, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

in any other area where EPA or an 

Indian tribe has demonstrated that a 

tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 

Indian country, the rule does not have 

tribal implications and will not impose 

substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law as 

specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 

FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean 

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of 

this action must be filed in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit by June 30, 2015. 

Filing a petition for reconsideration by 

the Administrator of this final rule does 

not affect the finality of this action for 

the purposes of judicial review nor does 

it extend the time within which a 

petition for judicial review may be filed, 

and shall not postpone the effectiveness 

of such rule or action. This action may 

not be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate 

matter, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Volatile organic 

compounds. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: April 14, 2015. 

Jared Blumenfeld, 

Regional Administrator, Region IX. 

Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code 

of Federal Regulations is amended as 

follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart F—California 

■ 2. Section 52.220 is amended by 

adding paragraph (c)(458) to read as 

follows: 

§ 52.220 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

(458) New and amended regulations 

for the following APCDs were submitted 

on December 29, 2014 by the Governor’s 

designee. 

(i) Incorporation by Reference. 

(A) South Coast Air Quality 

Management District. 

(1) Rule 1325, Rule 1325, ‘‘Federal 

PM2.5 New Source Review Program’’ 

adopted on December 5, 2014. 

[FR Doc. 2015–10239 Filed 4–30–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 180 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0248; FRL–9926–24] 

Azoxystrobin; Pesticide Tolerances 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes 

tolerances for residues of azoxystrobin 

in or on coffee, green bean; pear, Asian; 

and tea, dried. Syngenta Crop 

Protection, LLC requested these 

tolerances under the Federal Food, 

Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) to 

cover residues of azoxystrobin in coffee, 

Asian pear, and tea imported into the 

United States; there are currently no 

U.S. registrations for pesticides 

containing azoxystrobin that are used on 

coffee, Asian pear, or tea. 

DATES: This regulation is effective May 

1, 2015. Objections and requests for 

hearings must be received on or before 

June 30, 2015, and must be filed in 

accordance with the instructions 

provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also 

Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION). 

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, 

identified by docket identification (ID) 

number EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0248, is 

available at http://www.regulations.gov 

or at the Office of Pesticide Programs 

Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket) 

in the Environmental Protection Agency 

Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William 

Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 

Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 

20460–0001. The Public Reading Room 

is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, excluding legal 

holidays. The telephone number for the 

Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, 

and the telephone number for the OPP 

Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review 

the visitor instructions and additional 

information about the docket available 

at http://www.epa.gov/dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Susan Lewis, Registration Division 

(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, 

DC 20460–0001; main telephone 

number: (703) 305–7090; email address: 

RDFRNotices@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this action apply to me? 

You may be potentially affected by 

this action if you are an agricultural 

producer, food manufacturer, or 

pesticide manufacturer. The following 

list of North American Industrial 

Classification System (NAICS) codes is 

not intended to be exhaustive, but rather 

provides a guide to help readers 

determine whether this document 

applies to them. Potentially affected 

entities may include: 

• Crop production (NAICS code 111). 

• Animal production (NAICS code 

112). 

• Food manufacturing (NAICS code 

311). 

• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS 

code 32532). 

B. How can I get electronic access to 

other related information? 

You may access a frequently updated 

electronic version of EPA’s tolerance 

regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through 

the Government Publishing Office’s eCFR site at http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/ 

text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/

Title40/40tab_02.tpl 

C. How can I file an objection or hearing 

request? 

Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 

U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an 

objection to any aspect of this regulation 

and may also request a hearing on those 

objections. You must file your objection 

or request a hearing on this regulation 

in accordance with the instructions 

provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure 

proper receipt by EPA, you must 

identify docket ID number EPA–HQ– 

OPP–2014–0248 in the subject line on 

the first page of your submission. All 

objections and requests for a hearing 

must be in writing, and must be 

received by the Hearing Clerk on or 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES