alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of Southern Trust Securities Holding Corp., Inc. (the Corporation) each certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the Corporations Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and the information contained in that Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.





By: /s/ Kevin P. Fitzgerald

Kevin P. Fitzgerald

President

July 31, 2007





By: /s/ Fernando Fussa

Fernando Fussa

Chief Financial Officer



July 31, 2007



This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document, and may not be disclosed, distributed or used by any person for any reason other than as specifically required by law.
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:99cr18/RV

MICHAEL CRAIG PUGH

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Vinson on 12/15/2005 

Type of Motion/Pleading MOTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. 2241 TO MODIFY OR

CORRECT ILLEGAL SENTENCE

Filed by: Defendant Pugh on 9/19/05 Doc. No. 150

( ) Stipulated/Consented/Joint Pleading

RESPONSES:

on Doc. No.

on Doc. No.

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

Deputy Clerk

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 15th day of

 December , 2005, that:

(a) The requested relief is DENIED.

(b) The Booker/Blakely decisions are not retroactive.

/s/ Roger Vinson

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 3:99-cr-00018-RV-CJK Document 151 Filed 12/15/05 Page 1 of 1
#### § 29.3622 Rule 21.

Tobacco damaged under 20 percent but which otherwise meets the specifications of a grade shall be treated as a subgrade by placing the special factor “U” after the grademark. Tobacco damaged 20 percent or more shall be designated “No-G.”
#### § 1788.49 Contractors' bond requirements.

Construction contracts in amounts in excess of $250,000 for facilities shall require contractors to secure a contractors' bond, on a form approved by RUS, attached to the contract in a penal sum of not less than the contract price, which is the sum of all labor and materials including owner-furnished materials installed in the project. RUS Form 168b is for use when the contract exceeds $250,000. RUS Form 168c is for use when the contractor's surety has accepted a Small Business Administration guarantee and the contract is for $1,000,000 or less. For minor construction contracts under which work will be done in sections and no section will exceed a total cost of $250,000, the borrower may waive the requirement for a contractors' bond.
§ 1786.201 Definitions and rules of construction. ( a ) *Definitions.* As used in this subpart: *Administrator* means the Administrator of the Rural Utilities Service (RUS).
*Borrower* means any organization which has an outstanding note(s) evidencing electric or telephone loans guaranteed by RUS, from FFB.
*Business day* means any such day on which both the Federal Financing Bank and Federal Reserve Bank—New York are open for business.
*Electric loan* means a loan made by FFB and guaranteed by RUS under section 306 of the RE Act for electric service.
*FFB* means the Federal Financing Bank, an instrumentality and wholly owned corporation of the United States.
*Government* means the United States of America, acting through the Administrator of the Rural Utilities Service.
*Loan guarantee* means RUS's guarantee under section 306 of the RE Act of a loan from FFB.
*Payment date* means the date that payment is due and is the last day in a calendar quarter.
*Prepayment penalty* means the same as prepayment premium.
*Prepayment premium* shall have the meaning set forth at § 1786.207.
*RE Act* means the Rural Electrification Act of 1936, as amended (7 U.S.C. 901 *et seq.*).
*REA* means the Rural Electrification Administration formerly an agency of the United States Department of Agriculture and predecessor agency to RUS with respect to administering certain electric and telephone loan programs.
*Refinancing note* shall have the meaning set forth at § 1786.206.
*RUS* means the Rural Utilities Service, an agency of the United States Department of Agriculture established pursuant to Section 232 of the Federal Crop Insurance Reform and Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994 (Pub. L. 103-354, 108 Stat. 3178), successor to REA with respect to administering certain electric and telephone programs. See 7 CFR 1700.1.
*RUS loan contract* means the agreement, as amended, supplemented, or restated from time to time, between a borrower and RUS providing for loans or loan guarantees pursuant to the RE Act.
*RUS mortgage* means collectively those mortgages and security agreements made by and between the borrower and the Government, securing indebtedness evidencing electric and telephone loans or loan guarantees made pursuant to RE Act. The term includes such mortgages regardless whether third parties are mortgagees with RUS.
*Supplemental lender* means a private lender whose loan to the borrower is secured under an RUS mortgage.
*Telephone loan* means a loan made by FFB and guaranteed by RUS under section 306 of the RE Act for telephone service.
( b ) *Rules of construction.* Unless the context shall otherwise indicate, the terms defined in paragraph (a) of this section include the plural as well as the singular, and the singular as well as the plural. The words “herein,” “hereof” and “hereunder”, and words of similar import, refer to this subpart as a whole.
[58 FR 51008, Sept. 30, 1993, as amended at 59 FR 66440, Dec. 27, 1994]
#### Jewell Newman, appellee, v. Reinhold Nelson, appellant.

Gen. No. 37,516.

O’Connor, P. J., dissenting.

Opinion filed November 5, 1934.

John A. Bloomingston, for appellant. Wright & Kamin, for appellee; Alfred Kamin, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Matchett

delivered the opinion of the court.
|   | 1. |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                    |
|--------|----|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 2. |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|                                   | India Globalization Capital, Inc. |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                   |                              |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |   |
| Date: August 13,  2010  | By:                               | /s/ Ram Mukunda                                         |   |
|                                   |                              | Ram Mukunda                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |   |
|                                   |                              | Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal Executive Officer)                                                                                                                                                                                        |   |
#### § 29.75c Display of tobacco at receiving stations.

Each lot of tobacco delivered for sale at receiving stations and transferred to a conveyor system for unloading shall maintain a distance between adjacent lots of not less than 18 inches during the inspection process. The platform area used for examination with a conveyor system shall be a minimum of 4 × 4 feet. Any lots of tobacco displayed in a manner other than a conveyor system shall maintain a minimum clearance of 18 inches on all sides. If the tobacco is inspected or graded by the recipient, it shall be made available for mandatory inspection at the same time and location within the receiving station.

[67 FR 36081, May 23, 2002]
§ 3431.12 Selection of applicants. ( a ) *Review of applications.* Upon receipt, applications for the VMLRP will be reviewed for eligibility and completeness by the appropriate staff as determined by the Secretary. Incomplete or ineligible applications will not be processed or reviewed.
( b ) *Peer review.* ( 1 ) Applications for the VMLRP that are deemed eligible and complete will be referred to the VMLRP peer panel for peer review. In evaluating the application, reviewers are directed to consider the following components, as well as any other criteria identified in the RFA, and how they relate to the likelihood that the applicant will meet the terms and conditions of the VMLRP agreement, continue to serve in a veterinary shortage situation, or pursue a career in food supply veterinary medicine: ( i ) Major or emphasis area(s) during formal post-secondary training (e.g., bachelors degree major, minor);
( ii ) Major or emphasis area(s) during formal training for DVM/VMD degree;
( iii ) Specialty training area/discipline (e.g., board certification or graduate degree);
( iv ) Non-degree/non-board certification training or certifications (e.g., animal agrosecurity coursework and certifications);
( v ) Applicant's personal statement;
( vi ) Awards;
( vii ) Letters or recommendation, if applicable; and
( viii ) Other documentation or criteria, as specified in the RFA.
( 2 ) Applicants will then be ranked based on their qualifications relative to the attributes of the shortage situation applied for.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 USC, SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

          In connection with the quarterly report of Northern Ethanol, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Dated:  May 19, 2008 | s/Gordon Laschinger 

Gordon Laschinger, Chief Executive Officer |
|----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. Case No. 4:89cr4006-WS

Case No. 4:05cv186-WS/WCS

TYRONE SMITH, 

Defendant.

_____________________________/

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT

Defendant filed a "Motion to Void Illegal Part of Sentence" and a motion to

supplement. Docs. 754-755. It is separately recommended that the motion, as

supplemented, be denied.

It is therefore ORDERED that the motion to supplement, doc. 755, be

GRANTED. 

DONE AND ORDERED on July 7, 2005.

S/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR. 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 4:89-cr-04006-WS-WCS Document 756 Filed 07/07/05 Page 1 of 1
98-1478.

#### State ex rel. Grove v. Nadel.

Hamilton App. No. C-970324. On motion to supplement record. Motion denied.
<PAGE>
                                                  Exhibit 10.24.2

                         SIDE AGREEMENT

     This SIDE AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is entered into as of
March 1, 1996 by and among O'Brien (Schuylkill) Cogeneration,
Inc., a Delaware corporation ("O'Brien"), Adwin (Schuylkill)
Cogeneration, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation ("Adwin"), and
Trigen-Schuylkill Cogeneration, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation
("Trigen").  O'Brien, Adwin and Trigen will sometimes be referred
to collectively as the "Partners" and individually as a
"Partner."

                           BACKGROUND

     WHEREAS, the Partners have as of the date hereof entered
into that certain Acquisition Agreement (the "Acquisition
Agreement"), pursuant to which O'Brien and Adwin are together
selling to Trigen a one-third general partnership interest in
Grays Ferry Cogeneration Partnership (the "Partnership");

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Partners, intending to be legally bound
agree as follows:

     1.   Sections 7 and 8 of the Acquisition Agreement set forth
certain conditions to the obligations of the Partners and the
authority of the Escrow Agent (as defined in the Acquisition
Agreement) to break escrow.  The Partners agree that it shall be
an additional condition to the obligations of the Partners and to
the breaking of escrow that the partners shall have executed an
agreement with regard to the consents referenced in Sections 7.6
and 8.4 of the Acquisition Agreement and similar consents, in
form and substance satisfactory to the Partners, in which the
partners agree to use their best efforts to preserve the benefit
of such consents for the Partners unless partnership counsel
advises that it is legally imprudent to execute such an
agreement.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Partners have signed this Agreement
letter as of the date set forth above.

                         O'Brien (Schuylkill) Cogeneration, Inc.

                         By: /s/ Sanders Newman


                         Adwin (Schuylkill) Cogeneration, Inc.

                         By: /s/ William Brady


                         Trigen-Schuylkill Cogeneration, Inc.

                         By: /s/ S.B. Smith
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsTribological properties of ceramic/Ti3Al-Nb sliding couples for use as candidate seal materials to 700 deg CTribological properties of Ti3Al-Nb intermetallic disks sliding against alumina-boria-silicate fabric were ascertained in air at temperatures from 25 to 700 C. These materials are candidates for sliding seal applications for the National AeroSpace Plane. The tests were done using a pin on disk tribometer. Sliding was unidirectional at 0.27 m/sec under a nominal contact stress of 340 kPa. Gold sputter or ion plating deposited films were used to reduce friction and wear. Rhodium and palladium films were used beneath the gold lubricating films to prevent diffusion of the substrate into the gold at high temperature. The friction and wear of the unlubricated specimens was unacceptable. Friction coefficients were generally greater than 1.0. The ion plated gold films, when used with a rhodium diffusion barrier reduced friction by almost a factor of 2. Wear was also substantially reduced. The sputter deposited films were not adherent unless the substrate was sputter cleaned immediately prior to film deposition. Palladium did not function as a diffusion barrier.Document ID19900003342Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsDellacorte, Christopher*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Steinetz, Bruce M.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Brindley, Pamela K.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1989Subject CategoryChemistry And Materials (General)Report/Patent NumberNASA-TM-102401NAS 1.15:102401E-5048Meeting InformationMeeting: International Conference on Metallurgical CoatingsLocation: San Diego, CACountry: United StatesStart Date: April 2, 1990End Date: April 6, 1990Sponsors:American Vacuum SocietyAccession Number90N12658Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-63-1ADistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900003342.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d byN i nth C i r c ui tR ul e 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T GE OR GE T HO MAS WI L KE R S ON , P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. WOR L D S AV I NG S AN D L OA N AS S OC I AT I ON , D ef

endant- A pp el l ee . N o. 09- 17293 D. C . No . 2 : 0 8 - c v - 0 2 1 6 8 - L KK DA D ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia L aw r e nc e K . K ar l t on, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d N ove m be r16, 2010 ** B efo re: T A S H IM A , B E R Z O N , an dC L IF T O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. G e or ge T hom a s W i l ke r s on appe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e nt d is m is s in g h is a c tio n a lle g in g v ar io u s s ta te - law c la im s c o n c e rn in g , in te ra lia , h is hom e m ort ga ge l oan and the f or e c l os ur e of

hi s hom e i n 2001. W e ha ve 

# FI LED NO V 22 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 17293 2 ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o . Si lv as v . E *T rade Mo rt g a g e C o rp . , 51 4 F . 3d 10 01 , 10 03 (9th C i r. 20 08 ). W e a f f irm . T he di stri ctcourtprop er l y di sm i ss ed the com pl ai nt . T o the ext entthat W i l kers on ’ s c l ai m s f

al l w i thi n the ca t egori es l i st ed i n 1 2 C . F . R . § 5 60 . 2(b), they ar e p r e e m p te db yth e H o m e O w n e r s ’ L o an A c t. Se e Si lv as , 5 1 4 F .3 da t 1 0 0 4 - 0 6 . H is r e m a in in g c la im s ar e tim e - b arr e d . See G u a ra n t y T ru st C o m p a n y o f N ew Y o rk v. Y o rk , 32 6 U . S . 99 , 11 0-11 (194 5) (i n d i vers i ty c as es , forum st at e l aw det erm i nes w hi c h s t a t e ’ s s t a tut e of

l i m i t a t i ons gove rns ) ; C a l . C i v. P r oc . C ode §§ 318, 337- 39, 34 3 (se tt i ng forth rel evantC al i forni a s t atut es of l i m i t at i on s) . M oreover, the di stri ct c o u rt d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n b yd is m is s in g th e c o m p la in t w ith o u t le a v e to a m e n db e c au s e a m e n d m e n t w o u ldh a v e b e e n f u tile . Se e Chas e t

v . Fle e r / Sk y box Int ’l , 30 0 F . 3d 10 83 , 10 87 -88 (9th C i r. 20 02 ). W i l kers on ’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. W ilk e r s o n ’s u n o p p o s e dr e q u e s t f o rju d ic ia l n o tic e is g r an te d . AF F I RME D.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCT 

LIABILITY 

LITIGATION 

This Document Related to:

Leo Short 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

3M COMPANY, and AEARO 

TECHNOLOGIES LLC 

 Defendant 

Case No. 3:19-md-2885 (MCR/HTC)

Judge M. Casey Rodgers

Magistrate Judge Hope T. Cannon 

Civil Action No. 3:23-cv-04249

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

Please enter the appearance of Walter J. Nalducci, Esquire as attorney on behalf of Plaintiff, 

LEO SHORT, in regard to the above-captioned matter.

Respectfully submitted,

CUTRUZZULA & NALDUCCI

By /s/ Walter J. Nalducci

Walter J. Nalducci, Esquire

PA I.D. #69256

3300 Grant Building

310 Grant Street 

Pittsburgh, PA 15219

Phone: (412) 391-4040

Email: wnalducci@cnlawfirm.net

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3693 Filed 03/07/23 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing pleading was filed electronically. Notice of 

this filing will be sent by operation of the Court’s electronic filing system to all parties indicated 

on the electronic filing receipt. Parties may access this filing through the Court’s system. 

CUTRUZZULA & NALDUCCI

Date: __3/7/23_________ By: /s/ Walter J. Nalducci

Walter J. Nalducci, Esquire

PA I.D. #69256

3300 Grant Building

310 Grant Street 

Pittsburgh, PA 15219

Phone: (412) 391-4040

Email: wnalducci@cnlawfirm.net

Attorney for Plaintiff, LEO SHORT

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3693 Filed 03/07/23 Page 2 of 2