alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. 3:99cr30/RV 

3:12cv294/RV/CJK

ELIJAH WILLIE DIAL

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before the court on referral from the clerk. Defendant filed an

amended motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence by a person in federal

custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (Doc. 403). On August 14, 2012 defendant

was ordered to submit one service copy of his motion, or payment in the amount of

$6.00 to cover the cost of copying his 12 page motion, within thirty (30) days. (Doc.

405). This order was returned as undeliverable and marked “RTS.” The clerk was

instructed to re-send a copy of the order to defendant’s correct address, which the

clerk ascertained through the Bureau of Prisons website. (Doc. 406). After receiving

no response from defendant, the court entered an order to show cause for his failure

to comply. (Doc. 407). To date, defendant has failed to respond or explain his

inability to do so.

Accordingly, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

That defendant’s amended motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence (doc.

403) be denied and that this case be dismissed without prejudice.
Page 2 of 2

At Pensacola, Florida, this 8th day of November, 2012.

/s/Charles J. Kahn, Jr.

CHARLES J. KAHN, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

Any objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed within

fourteen days after being served a copy hereof. Any different deadline that may

appear on the electronic docket is for the court’s internal use only, and does not

control. A copy of any objections shall be served upon any other parties. Failure to

object may limit the scope of appellate review of factual findings. See 28 U.S.C. §

636; United States v. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698, 701 (11 Cir. 1988). th

Case No: 3:99cr30/RV; 3:12cv294/RV/CJK
98-1533.

#### State v. Brown.

Franklin App. Nos. 97APA10-1368 and 97APA10-1369. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; *sua sponte,*cause consolidated with 98-1429, *infra,*and held for the decision in 97-1985, *State v. Coolc,*Allen App. No. 1-97-21; briefing schedule stayed.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)

**Title:**  Smithsonian Opportunities for Research andStudy

1999-2000;2001-2002;2003-2004;2005-2006;2007-2008;2009-2010;2011-2012

 
Issues from 2013-present: https://purl.fdlp.gov/GPO/LPS5592

 
 
SuDoc: SI 1.44:�������
�Item Number:0910-W (online)
CGP system Number:000552104
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:97cr76LAC

VERNAL MALCOLM

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on December 4, 2008 

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION FOR REDUCTION OF SENTENCE PURSUANT TO TITLE 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) 

Filed by DEFENDANT PRO SE on 11/24/08 Doc.# 149

RESPONSES:

on Doc.#

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Mary Maloy

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 22

nd day of

December, 2008, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) Motion previously denied. See Doc 123. 

 s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 3:97-cr-00076-LC-MD Document 150 Filed 12/22/08 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Davidson
Growth Plus L.P. 1996 Year-End 10-KSB and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such 10-KSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000795757
<NAME> DAVIDSON GROWTH PLUS L.P.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           1,108
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        2
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,283
<PP&E>                                          23,569
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,377
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,475
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              506
<BONDS>                                         12,162
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,441
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,475
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,256
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,849
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,076
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       329
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    11.25<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23-3




               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS








ASA International Ltd.
Framingham, Massachusetts



    We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
Statement No. 33-312933 of ASA International Ltd. on Form S-8 of our report
dated February 15, 2000, relating to the financial statements of ASA Italy
S.r.l. as of December 31, 1999, appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche, LLP


Deloitte & Touche, LLP


Treviso, Italy
March 25, 2002
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

FRANK EDWIN PATE,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 3:20cv5408-MCR/MJF

WARDEN JOSEPH,

Respondent.

/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation dated December 2, 2020. ECF No. 8. The parties have been 

furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an 

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 

636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections 

thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should 

be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this Order.

Case 3:20-cv-05408-MCR-MJF Document 11 Filed 01/14/21 Page 1 of 2
2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for Petitioner’s failure to

pay the filing fee and his failure to comply with three court orders. 

3. The clerk of the court shall close the case file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 4th day of January 2021.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-05408-MCR-MJF Document 11 Filed 01/14/21 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ROBERT SINCLAIR LEE,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:20cv5462-MCR-HTC

LIEUTENANT T. MCCRANIE, 

et al., 

Defendants.

____________________________/

ORDER

The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on November 19, 

2021. ECF No. 65. The parties were furnished a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, 

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). There have been no timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the record, I have 

determined the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF Doc. 65, is 

adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.

Case 3:20-cv-05462-MCR-HTC Document 67 Filed 01/10/22 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:20cv5462-MCR-HTC

2. The Defendants’ Amended Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 

(ECF Doc. 53) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s Claims 2, 7, 8, 10, 11, and 14 are 

DISMISSED from the case.1

3. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF Doc. 49) and Second 

Amended Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF Doc. 51) are DENIED in their 

entirety.

4. The clerk shall NOT enter judgment on any claims at this time but

should refer the matter back to the magistrate judge for remaining pretrial 

proceedings.

DONE AND ORDERED this 10th day of January 2022. 

M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1 The only claims remaining are Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claims.

Case 3:20-cv-05462-MCR-HTC Document 67 Filed 01/10/22 Page 2 of 2
#### § 29.3063 Subgrade.

Any grade modified by a special factor symbol.

[24 FR 8771, Oct. 29, 1959. Redesignated at 47 FR 51722, Nov. 17, 1982, and at 49 FR 16758, Apr. 20, 1984]
#### § 29.1028 Leaf.

Whole, unstemmed leaf. Leaf, when applied to tobacco in strip form, shall describe the divided unit of a whole leaf.

[49 FR 16755, Apr. 20, 1984. Redesignated at 51 FR 25027, July 10, 1986]
#### § 29.9210 Office of inspection.

A field office of the inspection service of the Tobacco Division.
2006-0107.

#### Hughes v. Ohio Dept. of Commerce.

Franklin App. No. 04AP-1386, 2005-Ohio-6368. Discretionary appeal accepted.

Lundberg Stratton, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I only.

Resnick, J., dissents.

On motion for admission pro hac vice of Scott Mendeloff and Gabriel Aizenberg by Fordham E. Huffman. Motion granted.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 23, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 71411]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29388]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[MB Docket No. 08-197, RM-11491; DA 10-2117]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Silverpeak, NV

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Proposed rule; dismissal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Audio Division dismisses the petition for rule making 
filed by Shamrock Communications, Inc., proposing the allotment of 
Channel 291C at Silverpeak, Nevada, as the community's first local 
transmission service. The reason for the dismissal is that, in light of 
the prior dismissal of a proposed channel substitution at Amargosa 
Valley, Nevada, the proposal to allot Channel 291C at Silverpeak, 
Nevada, does not meet the Commission's spacing requirements for FM 
services. For that reason, the Audio Division dismissed the petition 
for rule making and terminated the proceeding without adoption of a 
final rule.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deborah Dupont, Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a synopsis of the Commission's 
Report and Order, MB Docket No. 08-197, adopted November 3, 2010, and 
released November 5, 2010. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in 
the FCC's Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, 
SW., Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. The complete text of this 
decision also may be purchased from the Commission's duplicating 
contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW., Room 
CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554, (800) 378-3160, or via the company's Web 
site, http://www.bcpiweb.com. The Report and Order is not subject to 
the Congressional Review Act. (The Commission, is, therefore, not 
required to submit a copy of this Report and Order to GAO, pursuant to 
the Congressional Review Act, see U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A) because the 
proposed rule was dismissed.)

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2010-29388 Filed 11-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
### The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, United States Distric t 1 

### Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. No. 96-1258
Russell Perrymore, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Western v. * District of Arkansas. * Cooper Communities, Inc., * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. *

Submitted: September 10, 1996 Filed: October 1, 1996

Before MAGILL, FLOYD R. GIBSON, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circui t Judges.

PER CURIAM.
Russell Perrymore appeals the grant of summary judgment to Coope r Commun ities, Inc., in a case involving alleged wrongful discharge, ag e discrimination, and o utrage. We have read all of the materials submitted by the parties and have considered their arguments. We see no error by th e district court and therefore affirm the judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 1
A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
EXHIBIT 3.5: Certificate of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation

                           CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                      OF
                         CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                      OF
                                  NUTEK, INC.

(Pursuant to NRS 78.385 and 78.390 -- After Issuance of Stock)

         We the undersigned do hereby certify that:

          1.  Nutek, Inc. (the "Corporation") is a corporation formed under the
laws of the State  of  Nevada,  and its Articles of Incorporation were filed in
the office of the Secretary of State on August 23, 1991.

         2. The Articles of Incorporation  are  hereby  amended by deleting the
existing  ARTICLE  IV  and  replacing  it  in its entirety with  the  following
amendments:

          "ARTICLE 4: Authorized Shares: The aggregate number of
     shares which the corporation shall have authority to issue shall
     consist of two hundred million (200,000,000) shares of Common
     Stock having a $.001 par value, and twenty million (20,000,000)
     shares of Preferred Stock having a $.001 par value.  The Common and/or
     Preferred Stock of the Company may be issued from time to time
     without prior approval by the stockholders.  The Common and/or
     Preferred Stock may be issued for such consideration as may be
     fixed from time to time by the board of directors.  The Board of
     Directors may issue such share of Common and/or Preferred Stock in
     one or more series, with such voting powers, designations, preferences
     and rights or qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof as
     shall be stated in the resolution or resolutions."

          3.  This amendment to the Articles of  incorporation  has  been  duly
adopted in accordance General Corporation Law of the State of Nevada.

         4. The number of shares of the Corporation outstanding and entitled
to vote on an amendment  to the Articles of Incorporation is:  45,188,132; that
the said changes and amendment  have  been  consented  to  and  approved  by  a
majority  vote of the stockholders holding at least a majority of each class of
stock outstanding and entitled to vote thereon.

         5.  The  number of shares voted for such amendments was 11,842,754 and
the number voted against such amendment was 0.

                            NUTEK, INC.


                            By:  /s/ Murray N. Conradie
                               ---------------------------
                                    Murray N. Conradie, CEO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

DERRICK EUGENE CULLINS,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 4:20cv115-AW-HTC

WAKULLA CORRECTIONAL 

INSTITUTION,

Respondent.

_______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

I have considered the magistrate judge’s May 20, 2020 Report and 

Recommendation. ECF No. 7. No objections have been filed. The Report and

Recommendation is now adopted and incorporated into this order. The clerk will

enter a judgment that says, “This case is dismissed without prejudice for failure to 

comply with a court order and failure to prosecute.” The clerk will close the file.

SO ORDERED on June 19, 2020. 

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00115-AW-HTC Document 8 Filed 06/19/20 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

MICHAEL RIVERS,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO.: 1:20cv107-MW/GRJ

ZENO OFFICE SOLS.,

Defendant.

___________________________/ 

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report 

and Recommendation. ECF No. 13. Upon consideration, no objections having 

been filed by the parties,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as this Court’s 

opinion. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 6, which has been converted to 

a motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. The Clerk shall enter judgment 

stating, “Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant is dismissed.” 

Case 1:20-cv-00107-MW-GRJ Document 14 Filed 11/02/20 Page 1 of 2
2

The Clerk shall also close the file. 

SO ORDERED on November 2, 2020.

s/Mark E. Walker 

Chief United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-00107-MW-GRJ Document 14 Filed 11/02/20 Page 2 of 2
§ 205.3 Incorporation by reference. ( a ) Certain material is incorporated by reference into this part with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. To enforce any edition other than that specified in this section, we must publish notice of change in the Federal Register and the material must be available to the public. All approved material is available for inspection at the USDA Agricultural Marketing Service, National Organic Program, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20250; (202) 720-3252, and is available from the sources listed below. It is also available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call (202) 741-6030 or go to *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .*
( b ) ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428; phone 1-877-909-2786; *http://www.astm.org/ .* ( 1 ) ASTM D5988-12 (“ASTM D5988”), “Standard Test Method for Determining Aerobic Biodegradation of Plastic Materials in Soil,” approved May 1, 2012, IBR approved for § 205.2.
( 2 ) ASTM D6400-12 (“ASTM D6400”), “Standard Specification for Labeling of Plastics Designed to be Aerobically Composted in Municipal or Industrial Facilities,” approved May 15, 2012, IBR approved for § 205.2.
( 3 ) ASTM D6866-12 (“ASTM D6866”), “Standard Test Methods for Determining the Biobased Content of Solid, Liquid, and Gaseous Samples Using Radiocarbon Analysis,” approved April 1, 2012, IBR approved for § 205.2.
( 4 ) ASTM D6868-11 (“ASTM D6868”), “Standard Specification for Labeling of End Items that Incorporate Plastics and Polymers as Coatings or Additives with Paper and Other Substrates Designed to be Aerobically Composted in Municipal or Industrial Facilities,” approved February 1, 2011, IBR approved for § 205.2.
( c ) European Committee for Standardization; Avenue Marnix, 17-B-1000 Brussels; phone 32 2 550 08 11; *www.cen.eu .* ( 1 ) EN 13432:2000:E (“EN 13432”), September, 2000, “Requirements for packaging recoverable through composting and biodegradation—Test scheme and evaluation criteria for the final acceptance of packaging,” IBR approved for § 205.2.
( 2 ) EN 14995:2006:E (“EN 14995”), December, 2006, “Plastics—Evaluation of compostability—Test scheme and specifications,” IBR approved for § 205.2.
( d ) International Organization for Standardization, 1, ch. de la Voie-Creuse, CP 56, CH-1211 Geneva 20, Switzerland; phone 41 22 749 01 11; *www.iso.org .* ( 1 ) ISO 17088:2012(E), (“ISO 17088”), “Specifications for compostable plastics,” June 1, 2012, IBR approved for § 205.2.
( 2 ) ISO 17556:2012(E) (“ISO 17556”), “Plastics—Determination of the ultimate aerobic biodegradability of plastic materials in soil by measuring the oxygen demand in a respirometer or the amount of carbon dioxide evolved,” August 15, 2012, IBR approved for § 205.2.
[79 FR 58662, Sept. 30, 2014]
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

LOVETTA CLARK,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 4:03-CV-330-SPM/AK

JOSE VASQUEZ, Warden,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

AND DISMISSING CASE

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the magistrate judge's report

and recommendation (doc. 18) dated June 8, 2005. The parties have been

furnished a copy and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections. 

Plaintiff filed her objections (doc. 19) on June 27, 2005.

Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), I have made

a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made. 

Any failure by congress to enact a title into positive law “has only evidentiary

significance and does not render the underlying enactment invalid or

unenforceable.” Ryan v. Bilby, 764 F.2d 1325, 1328 (9th Cir.1985). A number of

courts have specifically examined Title 21, the title to which Plaintiff refers, and

Case 4:03-cv-00330-SPM-AK Document 20 Filed 07/13/05 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

4:03-CV-330-SPM/AK

come to the same conclusion. E.g., Turner v. Glickman, 207 F.3d 419 (7th Cir.

2000); Wilson v. United States, 946 F.2d 902 (10th Cir. 1991); United States v.

Almonte-Nunez, 1999 WL 1215922 (D.C. Cir. 1999); Anderson v. United States,

2004 WL 2326386 (N.D.N.Y. 2004); United States v. Packard, 2003 WL

22327174 (D. Kan. 2003); Henriquez v. United States, 2003 WL 21242722

(S.D.N.Y. 2003).

Plaintiff has not shown that she is entitled to relief. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 18) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus (doc. 1) is denied.

2. This case is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

DONE AND ORDERED this thirteenth day of July, 2005.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

/pao

Case 4:03-cv-00330-SPM-AK Document 20 Filed 07/13/05 Page 2 of 2