alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2307 

To require the Secretary of State to submit to Congress reports on water 

sharing with Mexico. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 10, 2013 

Mr. VELA (for himself and Mr. CONAWAY) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of State to submit to Congress 

reports on water sharing with Mexico. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Working to Address 

5 Treaty Enforcement Rapidly for Texas Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPORTS ON WATER SHARING WITH MEXICO. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of State shall sub8 mit to Congress a report— 

9 (1) not later than 45 days after the date of en10 actment of this Act, and quarterly thereafter, deVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:56 Jun 13, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2307.IH H2307

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2307 IH

1 scribing efforts by Mexico to meet the treaty obliga2 tions of Mexico to deliver water to the Rio Grande, 

3 in accordance with the treaty between the United 

4 States and Mexico entitled ‘‘Utilization of Waters of 

5 the Colorado and Tijuana Rivers and of the Rio 

6 Grande’’ (done at Washington, February 3, 1944); 

7 and 

8 (2) not later than 1 year after the date of en9 actment of this Act, and annually thereafter, de10 scribing the benefits to the United States of the doc11 ument entitled ‘‘Interim International Cooperative 

12 Measures in the Colorado River Basin through 2017 

13 and Extension of Minute 318 Cooperative Measures 

14 to Address the Continued Effects of the April 2010 

15 Earthquake in the Mexicali Valley, Baja California’’ 

16 (done at Coronado, California, November 20, 2012 

17 (commonly referred to as ‘‘Minute Number 319’’)). 

18 (b) ACTION BY SECRETARY OF STATE.—Notwith19 standing any other provision of law, the Secretary of State 

20 shall not extend Minute Number 319 if the Secretary fails 

21 to comply with the requirements of this Act. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN

Honorable Charlie Pigg, Chaim8n, Comalttee on Eleemosynsry InStitutions House OfRepIWSent8tiVeS Austin, Texas

Dear Mr. Pigg:

8s the Texas TeX8e 8IldS81d ed and empowered 811 females training who laay elves orwho may in the manner and er provided. ern%ng bO8rd of this inatltuoaed of the aqpeDl&etident of e Independent School districts in stltution Is situated and the city or county health officer of thedistrict In which this Institution is located, and those members ah811 select 8 thirdmember. These threemembers shall be the governing bbdy for this Institution end shell receive no pay for the performance of their duties.Honorable Charlie Plgg, page 2

"SECTION 2. Any judge of 8 County Court in the County where an 811Sged female between the ages of twelve 8nd twentyyears inclusive is brought by any peace officer or voluntarily come6 before 8ny County Judge and is guilty of:
"1. Being found tobe an infectious carrier of 8 veneral disease, may, if such committing County Judge adjudge that It is for thewelfare of such female that she be placed in thehospital and training center be committed to the Texas School fornot more than oneyear. The above mentioned institution Ishereby authorized to receive and detain females so committed.
"SECTJON 

### 3. Such commlttment shall be for 

### anyperiod of timenot exceeding oneyear. A commlttment made under this section which shell recite the fact upon which it isbased, shall not be invalid by 

### reasonof any lmperfqctlons or defects in form.

:.:.v. "SECTION 

### 4. Any person committed under the

provisions of this 18W to said FnstltutlOns m8y be released orparoled therefrom 8t8ny time after her cotumlttmentupon thewritten certlflcate of the responsible head of the institution, setting forth the reasonr-forsuch release or parole, towhich is attached an lndorsement of theheed of theMedic81 Staff of said lnstltutlon. Nhen 811lnm8te of said institution is dlsmissed, 8.copy of the records pertaining to such Individual shell be filed and reoorded in the Court of Commlttment."
It Is the opinion of thisdepartment th8t the Committee amendment, if enacted into law,would constitute such "pX+eXi8thg law"under Section 44 ofArticle III, requiring 8 pl'e-eXlsting18W 8swould authoriee~a legisl8tiVe approprlatlon ofmoney out of the treasury. Of course, theamendment if enacted would not itself constitute 8n appropriation, since It c8rrles no specific appropriation, neither would the State inany event be liable, unless and until theLegislature should make 8 specific appropriation inpursuance of theAct.

If theamendment were to contain 8 clause speclflcally stating th8t the State would inno event be liable pecunlar-Honorsble Charlie Plgg, page 

### 3

fly toany extent under the terms of suchAct, then no Legislature could thereaftermake an appropriation ln the face of theprovisions of 

### Se&Ion 44,Article XVI, above mentioned.

Very trulyyours
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

By (s) Ocie Speer

Assititsnt

0S:ff

APPROVED MAR. 

### 31, 1943 (s) Ger8ld C.Mann ATTORNEY GEXERU OF lpExA3

. APPROVED Opinion Committee By. B.W.B. Chalrm8n
### IN THE UNI TED STATES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCUIT

No. 12-40916 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. JOSE ANTONIO LARIUS Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:12-CR-500-1
Before KING, CLEMENT, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Jose Antonio Larius raises an argument that he concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Izaguirre-Flores , 405 F.3d 270, 277-78 (5th Cir. 2005), which held that the North Carolina offense of taking indecent liberties with a child constitutes “sexual abuse of a minor” and thus is a cri m e of violence for purposes of the 16-level enhancement under United States Sentencing Guidelines § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii). L a ri us’s motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and th e j u d g m e nt of the district court is AFFIRMED. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Februa ry 6, 201 3 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 , the court hasd ete rm inedthat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 12-40916 Document: 00512136694 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/06/2013
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

 Northern District of Florida

LEDAWN GIBSON FLORIDA A&M UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES

FLORIDA A&M UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES

c/o OFFICE OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL

1700 LEE HALL DRIVE

SUITE 304-SHAC

TALLAHASSES, FL 32307

 CARLOS J. BURRUEZO, ESQ. 

 BERTHA L. BURRUEZO, ESQ.

 BURRUEZO & BURRUEZO, PLLC

 911 OUTER LANE ROAD

 ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32814

10/15/2019

Case 4:19-cv-00512-MW-MAF Document 3 Filed 10/15/19 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

0.00

Case 4:19-cv-00512-MW-MAF Document 3 Filed 10/15/19 Page 2 of 2
# CI2021380EN.01000501.xml

| 20.9.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 380/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.9.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 380/5

---

Statement by the European Commission on the modulation/suspension of assistance in Article 8, paragraph 5 of Regulation (EU) 2021/1529 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA III)

(2021/C 380 I/05)

The European Commission considers that the provision in Article 8(5) respects the powers of the Commission in the implementation of Union programmes, and the Union budget in general as long as it is without prejudice to the powers entrusted to the Commission by the Treaties and the Financial Regulation to suspend Union assistance provided to third countries.

---
|   |           |   |   |   |   | RIDGEWOOD ENERGY P FUND, LLC                    |
|--------|----------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated: | August 3, 2010 | By:    | /s/    |   |   | ROBERT E. SWANSON                                    |
|   |           |   | Name:  |   |   | Robert E. Swanson                                    |
|   |           |   | Title: |   |   | Chief Executive Officer                              |
|   |           |   |   |   |   | (Principal Executive Officer)                        |
|   |           |   |   |   |   |                                                 |
|   |           |   |   |   |   |                                                 |
| Dated: | August 3, 2010 | By:    | /s/    |   |   | KATHLEEN P. MCSHERRY                                 |
|   |           |   | Name:  |   |   | Kathleen P. McSherry                                 |
|   |           |   | Title: |   |   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |           |   |   |   |   | (Principal Financial Officer)                        |
|   |           |   |   |   |   |                                                 |
|   |           |   |   |   |   |                                                 |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         212,500
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 212,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   212,500
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,120,900
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  122,300
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,521,600
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,521,600
<EPS-BASIC>                                      17.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    17.84


</TABLE>
AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE


TO THE


1993 NONEMPLOYEE DIRECTOR STOCK OPTION PLAN


OF


FOSSIL, INC.


 


The following
Amendment to the 1993 Nonemployee Director Stock Option Plan of Fossil, Inc.
(the “Plan”), as authorized by the Board of Directors of Fossil, Inc. (the
“Company”), is adopted as of the effective date specified herein:


 


Notwithstanding
the provisions of paragraph 13 of the Plan, grants of Options under the Plan
commencing on January 1, 1999, shall not be adjusted for the 3-for-2
split of the Common Stock of the Company effected as a stock dividend on April 8,
1998 to all stockholders of record on March 25, 1998.


 


All other
terms and conditions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.


 


This amendment
shall become effective as of December 31, 1998


	
   

  
	
  Fossil, Inc. 

  
	 
	 

	 
	 

	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Tom
  Kartsotis

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Tom
  Kartsotis

  
	
   

  	
  Chairman and
  Chief Executive Officer
§ 301.87-4 Conditions governing the interstate movement of regulated articles from regulated areas in quarantined States. Any regulated article may be moved interstate from any regulated area in a quarantined State if moved under the following conditions:1 ( a ) With a certificate or limited permit issued and attached in accordance with §§ 301.87-5 and 301.87-8; or
( b ) Without a certificate or limited permit, if ( 1 ) Moved directly through any regulated area, and
( 2 ) The article originated outside of any regulated area, and
( 3 ) The point of origin of the article is clearly indicated by shipping documents, its identity has been maintained, and it has not been used for the production of sugarcane while in the regulated area.
[48 FR 50059, Oct. 31, 1983, as amended at 87 FR 80016, Dec. 29, 2022]
EXHIBIT 23.a.

                CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


      We  hereby consent to the incorporation by refernce in  the
Registration  Statements Nos. 333-76616, 333-65013  and  333-6103
each on  Form  S-8 and to Registration Statement No. 333-45218 on
Form  S-3, and in  the  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-KSB of Igene
Biotechnology, Inc. for the year ended December 31,  2001, of our
report  dated  February  20,  2001 (March 27, 2001 for  Note 20),
relating  to  the  consolidated  financial  statements  of  Igene
Biotechnology, Inc.




                                 Berenson & Company LLP
                                 ______________________
                                 Berenson & Company LLP

New York, New York
March 28, 2002
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7587

ISAAC L. KINGSBY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

S. K. YOUNG,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

A. HARDING, Correctional Officer, WRSP; JOHN

DOE, Correctional Officer, WRSP,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District

Judge. (CA-01-592-7)

Submitted: April 16, 2003 Decided: May 6, 2003

Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Isaac L. Kingsby, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant

Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: 

Isaac L. Kingsby appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

substantially on the reasoning of the district court. See Kingsby

v. Young, No. CA-01-592-7 (W.D. Va. filed Sept. 30, 2002, entered

Oct. 1, 2002). We deny Kingsby’s motion for appointment of counsel.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
118 STAT. 1752 PUBLIC LAW 108–371—OCT. 25, 2004

Public Law 108–371

108th Congress

An Act

To modify and extend certain privatization requirements of the Communications

Satellite Act of 1962.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PRIVATIZATION REQUIREMENTS MODIFIED AND

EXTENDED.

Section 621(5) of the Communications Satellite Act of 1962

(47 U.S.C. 763) is amended—

(1) in subparagraph (A)(ii), by striking ‘‘June 30, 2004’’

and inserting ‘‘June 30, 2005’’; and

(2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:

‘‘(F) Notwithstanding subparagraphs (A) and (B), a

successor entity may be deemed a national corporation

and may forgo an initial public offering and public securities listing and still achieve the purposes of this section

if—

‘‘(i) the successor entity certifies to the Commission

that—

‘‘(I) the successor entity has achieved substantial dilution of the aggregate amount of signatory

or former signatory financial interest in such

entity;

‘‘(II) any signatories and former signatories

that retain a financial interest in such successor

entity do not possess, together or individually,

effective control of such successor entity; and

‘‘(III) no intergovernmental organization has

any ownership interest in a successor entity of

INTELSAT or more than a minimal ownership

interest in a successor entity of Inmarsat;

‘‘(ii) the successor entity provides such financial

and other information to the Commission as the

Commission may require to verify such certification;

and

‘‘(iii) the Commission determines, after notice and

comment, that the successor entity is in compliance

with such certification.

‘‘(G) For purposes of subparagraph (F), the term

‘substantial dilution’ means that a majority of the financial

Oct. 25, 2004

[S. 2896]

PUBLIC LAW 108–371—OCT. 25, 2004 118 STAT. 1753

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 2896:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):

Oct. 5, considered and passed Senate.

Oct. 8, considered and passed House.

Æ

interests in the successor entity is no longer held or controlled, directly or indirectly, by signatories or former signatories.’’.

Approved October 25, 2004.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

THOMAS EVERITT BROWN, IV,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 5:20-cv-117-MCR-MJF

RICKY D. DIXON,

Respondent.

_____________________________________/

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report 

and Recommendation dated January 21, 2022. ECF No. 14. The parties were

furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and were afforded an 

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 

636(b)(1). There have been no timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation and the record, the Court

concludes that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 14, is 

adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.

Case 5:20-cv-00117-MCR-MJF Document 17 Filed 04/22/22 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 5:20cv117-MCR/MJF

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus, Doc. 1, challenging the judgment 

of conviction and sentence in State of Florida v. Thomas Everitt Brown, IV, Bay 

County Circuit Court Case No. 2010-CF-2443, is DENIED.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of April 2022.

M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 5:20-cv-00117-MCR-MJF Document 17 Filed 04/22/22 Page 2 of 2
#### § 28.414 Strict Low Middling Light Spotted Color.

Strict Low Middling Light Spotted Color is color which in spot or color, or both, is between Strict Low Middling Color and Strict Low Middling Spotted Color.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CAREERENGINE
NETWORK,  INC. AND  SUBSIDIARIES'  CONSOLIDATED  BALANCE SHEET AND  CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         1,006,276
<SECURITIES>                                   4,888,610
<RECEIVABLES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       0
<PP&E>                                        71,601,252
<DEPRECIATION>                                   664,689
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                79,681,231
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  0
<BONDS>                                       72,750,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                         674,960
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,278,940
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  79,681,231
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,086,352
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               7,000,727
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  127,241
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (4,401,616)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               10,778
<DISCONTINUED>                                (4,052,394)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (4,052,394)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (.75)


</TABLE>