alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                  Exhibit 10.11.4


                         April 30, 1996



O'Brien (Newark) Cogeneration, Inc.
O'Brien (Parlin) Cogeneration, Inc.
1221 Nicollet Mall
Suite 700
Minneapolis, Minnesota  55403

          Re:  Amended and Restated Agreement for Purchase and
               Sale of Electric Power (the "Parlin PPA") between
               O'Brien (Parlin) Cogeneration, Inc. ("Parlin") and
               Jersey Central Power & Light Company ("JCP&L") and
               the Third Amendment to Power Purchase Agreement
               ("Newark Third Amendment") between O'Brien
               (Newark) Cogeneration, Inc. ("Newark") and JCP&L

Gentlemen:

     Please refer to the above-referenced Parlin PPA and Newark
Third Amendment and to the Other of Approval dated April 29, 1996
in docket numbers EM8804-396 and EM88121345, of the State of New
Jersey Board of Public Utilities (the "BPU Approval"), a copy of
which is attached hereto.

     This letter is to confirm our mutual understanding and
agreement that, the BPU Approval having been received, executed
signature pages to the Third Amendment and the Parlin PPA having
been exchanged, the bankruptcy court order approving the NRG Plan
(as defined in the Parlin PPA and the Newark Third Amendment)
having been entered on February 23, 1996 and the gas supply
agreement between JCP&L and Public Service Electric and Gas
Company having been entered into and approved by the New Jersey
Board of Public Utilities, air conditions precedent to the Newark
Third Amendment and the Parlin PPA have been satisfied and the
Parlin PPA and the Newark Third Amendment have become effective
as of April 30, 1996.

<PAGE>

     If the foregoing accurately sets forth our agreement, please
so indicate by executing this letter in the space provided below
and sending it to us by facsimile transmitter.


                              JERSEY CENTRAL POWER & LIGHT
                              COMPANY

                              By:         /s/ M.P. Morrell
                                   Name:  Michael P. Morrell
                                   Title: Vice President

AGREED:

O'BRIEN (NEWARK) COGENERATION,
INC.


By:  /s/ Leonard Bluhm
     Leonard A. Bluhm
     President


O'BRIEN (PARLIN) COGNERATION,
INC.


By:  /s/ Leonard Bluhm
     Leonard A. Bluhm
     President
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2530 

AN ACT 

To improve transparency and efficiency with respect to audits 

and communications between taxpayers and the Internal 

Revenue Service. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2530 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Taxpayer Trans3 parency and Efficient Audit Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DEADLINE FOR RESPONSES TO TAXPAYER COR5 RESPONDENCE. 

6 Not later than 30 days after receiving any written 

7 correspondence from a taxpayer, the Internal Revenue 

8 Service shall provide a substantive written response. For 

9 purposes of the preceding sentence, an acknowledgment 

10 letter shall not be treated as a substantive response. 

11 SEC. 3. TAXPAYER NOTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURES BY IRS 

12 OF TAXPAYER INFORMATION. 

13 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after dis14 closing any taxpayer information to any agency or instru15 mentality of Federal, State, or local government, the In16 ternal Revenue Service shall provide a written notification 

17 to the taxpayer describing— 

18 (1) the information disclosed, 

19 (2) to whom it was disclosed, and 

20 (3) the date of disclosure. 

21 (b) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) shall not apply if 

22 the Secretary of the Treasury, or the Secretary’s designee, 

23 determines that such notification would be detrimental to 

24 an ongoing criminal investigation or pose a risk to na25 tional security. 
3 

•HR 2530 EH

1 SEC. 4. DEADLINE FOR CONCLUSION OF AUDITS OF INDI2 VIDUAL TAXPAYERS. 

3 If any audit of a tax return of an individual by the 

4 Internal Revenue Service is not concluded before the end 

5 of the 1-year period beginning on the date of the initiation 

6 of such audit, the Internal Revenue Service shall provide 

7 the taxpayer a written letter explaining why such audit 

8 has taken more than 1 year to complete. 

9 SEC. 5. NO ADDITIONAL FUNDS AUTHORIZED. 

10 No additional funds are authorized to carry out the 

11 requirements of this Act. Such requirements shall be car12 ried out using amounts otherwise authorized or appro13 priated. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 25, 

2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2530 

AN ACT 

To improve transparency and efficiency with repayers and the Internal Revenue Service. spect to audits and communications between tax-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,056,240
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,230,822
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  2,225,289
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,677,455
<PP&E>                                         666,963
<DEPRECIATION>                                 340,646
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,102,950
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,327,384
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        125
<COMMON>                                           535
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,002,302
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,102,950
<SALES>                                     11,946,702
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,946,702
<CGS>                                        7,376,904
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,768,176
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               145,643
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,351,992
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (9,696,013)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (9,696,813)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (9,696,813)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.81)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.81)


</TABLE>
STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT



 Exhibit 10.32 
  
 <Date> 
 <Employee Name> 

<Employee Address> 
  
 Dear <Employee Name>: 
  
 Pursuant to the
terms and conditions of the Plug Power Inc., 1999 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), you have 
  

			
	Granted To:	 	 
		
	Grant Date:	 	 
		
	 Granted:
 Grant Price:
	 	Total Cost to Exercise:
		
	Expiration Date:	 	 
		
	Vesting Schedule:	 	 

  
 The Grant on the date shown above, has
been issued to me under the terms and conditions of the Plan. If you need a copy of the plan, please contact your Employee Benefits Department. 
  
  
 Note: If there are any discrepancies in the name or address shown above,
please 
 make the appropriate corrections on this form and return to your Employee Benefits Department
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Louise S. Riggle, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Memorandum by the Court. Appeal by claimant from a decision denying unemployment insurance benefits. The board found that the claimant had refused employment to which she was suitably fitted by training and experience and that the wages offered were not substantially less favorable than those received in her previous employment and such act on her part constituted a refusal of employment without good cause. There is substantial evidence to sustain the finding of the board. Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds. Aulisi and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur.
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: August 6, 2009 | By:    | /s/  Michael C. Linn       |
|---------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|
|                      |   | Michael C. Linn                      |
|                      |   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
§ 319.8-24 Collection and disposal of waste. ( a ) Importers shall handle imported, unfumigated cotton and covers in a manner to avoid waste. If waste does occur, the importer or his or her agent shall collect and dispose of such waste in a manner satisfactory to the inspector.
( b ) If, in the judgment of an inspector, it is necessary as a safeguard against risk of pest dispersal to clean railway cars, lighters, trucks, and other vehicles and vessels used for transporting such cotton or covers, or to clean piers, warehouses, fumigation plants, mills, or other premises used in connection with importation of such cotton or covers, the importer or his or her agent shall perform such cleaning, in a manner satisfactory to the inspector.
( c ) All costs incident to such collection, disposal, and cleaning other than the services of the inspector during his or her regular tour of duty and at the usual place of duty, shall be borne by the importer or his or her agent.
[24 FR 10788, Dec. 29, 1959, as amended at 70 FR 33324, June 7, 2005]
Exhibit
32




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Each
of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Sino Gas
International Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of his knowledge:





(1)
 The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the
fiscal  quarter  ended September 30, 2009 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and





(2)
 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Date:
November 13, 2009





/s/
      Yuchuan LiuYuchuan
      LiuChief
      Executive Officer/s/
      Yugang ZhangYugang
      ZhangChief
      Financial Officer
Nora Wright 

8 Chestnut St Boston, Mass. 02108 Beacon Hill Meeting (Religious Society of Friends) 

The United States — all of us and the government that acts on behalf of the public good - 

we all need to support the biggest and most promising climate proposal to date — these 

new EPA regulations. The magnitude of the climate change threat requires bold 

national action. 

As a Cornell trained city and regional planner, I understand the importance of analyzing 

trends and preparing for the future. We know that to avoid the worst impact of 

warming, in 2009 at the Copenhagen Summit, the world agreed that the temperature 

should not exceed 2 degrees Celsius. That can be translated into gigatons of carbon —

how much more carbon can be emitted before we exceed 2 degrees. That number is 

something more than 50o for all of us. That is our CARBON BUDGET - global emissions 

need to remain within this carbon budget. If current emissions levels stay the same, the 

planet's carbon budget will be exhausted by 2024-10 years from now—or even earlier if 

their upward trend continues. 

This is a climate crisis. 

If unchecked, fossil fuel companies will simply carry out their stated mission of selling 

and burning their reserves. What will be the climate impact? All models suggest we will 

far exceed the 2 degree limit and we may expect global temperature to rise over 5° 

Celsius. What is the effect of 5 degrees increase? 

• 2 degrees puts Amsterdam under water, 3-4 degrees puts NY under water, 

• oceans die as habitats 

• 75% of the sea ice will be gone 

• Italy, Spain and Greece will have become deserts 

• 40% of species are at risk for extinction at 3-4 degrees 

• it is unclear what species can survive a 5 degree increase 

I support the EPA's regulation of carbon and hope the state plans will 

center on renewable energy. Future generations, if we manage to pull this out of the 

fire, will find it incomprehensible that we Americans continued until well into the 21st 

century to engage in behavior that seriously compromised the habitability of our own 

country and the planet. May it be said of us that we did everything in our power to 

reverse the climate crisis while there is still some time left.
EXHIBIT 32

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BlackRock Capital Investment Corporation (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31,
2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Steven Sterling, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Corinne Pankovcin, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|/s/ Steven Sterling  
|Name:                 |  | Steven Sterling                      
|Title:                |  | Chief Executive Officer              
|Date:                 |  | April 30, 2015                       
|                     
|/s/ Corinne Pankovcin
|Name:                 |  | Corinne Pankovcin                    
|Title:                |  | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|Date:                 |  | April 30, 2015
§ 301.51-7 Assembly and inspection of regulated articles. ( a ) Persons requiring certification or other services must request the services from an inspector[1] at least 48 hours before the services are needed.
( b ) The regulated articles must be assembled at the place and in the manner that the inspector designates as necessary to comply with this subpart.
[62 FR 10416, Mar. 7, 1997, as amended at 87 FR 80006, Dec. 29, 2022] Footnotes -
301.51-7
[1] See footnote 1 to § 301.51-5.
Q ^\mj -

U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Office of the Secretary 

of Transportation 

.[-Or^TAiiui'-: 

'•J' A •••• " 

Assistant Secretary 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washinglon. DC 20590 

MAR 2 1 2011 

Nydia Padilla Claudio 

President Board of Director 

South Puerto Rico Towing & Boat Service, Inc. 

P.O. Box 560578 

Guayanilla, Puerto Rico 00656-0578 

Dear Ms. Padilla: 

Thank you for your February 28 letter regarding assistance to the Mercedita Airport under the 

Essential Air Service (EAS) program. As you probably know, Ponce has formally appealed the 

U.S. Department of Transportation's decision to rely on JetBlue's subsidy-free service to the 

mainland and not to renew Cape Air's EAS contract. We are currently evaluating the merits of 

the community's appeal. As is normal practice, we are placing a copy of your letter and this 

response in the Docket, which is available for public viewing at www.regulations.gov by 

entering DOT-OST-1999-6592 in the search field. 

If I can provide further information or assistance, please feel free to call me. 

Sincerely yours, 

Jusan L. Kurlan 

Assistant Secretary for 

Aviation and International Affairs 

^ ^ 
SI 0-1 U)3U)-(K(6 

Fcbnufy, 28 2011 

Honorable Ray IdHoo d 

Secretary of Transpoitatioo 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave. SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Tenninadon cf EAS Ptogtam 

in Mercedita Airport Ponce, 

Puerto Rico 

Dear Mister LaHood: 

I am writing these few words to let you know my concern about the termination of the subsidy 

given to the Mercedita Airport in the Oty of Ponce through the Essential Air Service Program 

(EAS). As a trader in the south area of the island this wiU affect directly to the economy of the 

endre zone. 

Hie Airport helps us as an ad hoc airport, but also helps the tounsm in the south, cast, and 

central area of the Islatid. Mercedita is the fastest way to cotmect with Puerto Rico's capital, San 

Juan. It is also essential that schedule air service, including both passenger and cargo, between 

Ponce and San Juan continue. 

Puerto Rico has a unique geographic characteristics and cultural ties to the Caribbean and Latin 

America. The continuity of intemadonal air services from all the serviceable points in the island 

is essential to the cultural and economic growth of the region. The termination of the subsidy 

would imply the dismissal of the airpon employees increasing unemployment percentage in 

Puerto Rico. 

As an employer and dtizcn of the south region of Puerto Rico, I urge that Mercedita Airport 

continue in the EAS platform. 

^^dia Padilla C&udio 

President Board of Director 

South Puerto Rico Towing & 

Boat Service, Inc. 

sprtowingfglcoq ui.net 

X^ 

SOUTH PUERTO RICO TOWING & BOAT SERVICE, INC. 

P.O. BOX 560578. GUAYANILU. PUERTO RICO 00656-0578 

TELEPHONES; (787) 835-2795 • 844-6415/ FAX: (787) 844-6838
113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2611 

AN ACT 

To designate the headquarters building of the Coast Guard 

on the campus located at 2701 Martin Luther King, 

Jr., Avenue Southeast in the District of Columbia as 

the ‘‘Douglas A. Munro Coast Guard Headquarters 

Building’’, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2611 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The headquarters building of the Coast Guard on the 

3 campus located at 2701 Martin Luther King, Jr., Avenue 

4 Southeast in the District of Columbia shall be known and 

5 designated as the ‘‘Douglas A. Munro Coast Guard Head6 quarters Building’’. 

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

8 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the building 

10 referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference 

11 to the ‘‘Douglas A. Munro Coast Guard Headquarters 

12 Building’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 16, 2013. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2611 

AN ACT 

To designate the headquarters building of the 

and for other purposes. Munro Coast Guard Headquarters Building’’, the District of Columbia as the ‘‘Douglas A. Martin Luther King, Jr., Avenue Southeast in Coast Guard on the campus located at 2701
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATIONS
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I,
William J. Worthen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Alsius Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in such quarterly report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
Alsius Corporation.




Date:
      May 15, 2008
            
            By:
            /s/
      William J. WorthenName:
            William
      J. WorthenTitle:
            President
      and Chief Executive Officer






I, Brett
L. Scott, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
of Alsius Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such quarterly
report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Alsius Corporation




Date:
      May 15, 2008
            
            By:
            /s/
      Brett L. ScottName:
            Brett
      L. ScottTitle:
            Chief
      Financial Officer





A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Alsius Corporation and will be retained by Alsius Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
§ 3201.44 Corrosion preventatives. ( a ) *Definition.* Products designed to prevent the deterioration (corrosion) of metals.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 53 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than October 27, 2010, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased corrosion preventatives. By that date, Federal agencies that have the responsibility for drafting or reviewing specifications for items to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased corrosion preventatives.
[74 FR 55093, Oct. 27, 2009]
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Datascension, Inc.,(the “Company”) on Form 10K for the year ending December 31, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Lou
Persico, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge and belief:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.








/s/Lou Persico





Lou
Persico


Chief
Executive Officer, President


And
Director


April 15,
2010
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHAD CRAIG RENFRO-NARDUZZI,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 128 MM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of October, 2018, in consideration of the Request for 

Appointment of Counsel, this matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of 

Centre County for it to determine, within 60 days, whether an attorney should be 

reappointed to represent Petitioner. 

The Court of Common Pleas of Centre County is instructed to promptly notify this 

Court of its determination.