alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
May4, 2012 Mr. Dennis DeVany Chief, Essential Air Service Division Office ofAviation Analysis Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue SE Washington, D.C. 20590 

### PHILBRYANT GOVERNOR

Reference: DOT-OST-2008-0209, 2001-10685, 2009-0305, Greenville, MS, laurel/Hattiesburg, MS, and Tupelo, MS Dear Mr. DeVany, 

### 1wish to lend my support tothe proposal ofSilverAirways to provide essential airservice in the State of Mississippi as replacement forcurrent Delta Air linesservice. local air service that provides an effective connection to the national and international air transportation system is critical to the economic well being ofthe citizens ofMississippi. Many people in Greenville, laurel, Hattiesburg, Tupelo and the surrounding areas rely on local air service for both business and leisure travel. The Silver Airways proposals offer us a modern 34-seat turboprop aircraft and flights toAtlanta, which is not only the largest hub airport in the world but also a popular business and leisure travel destination for Mississippians in its own right. I believe the Silver airservice proposals represent the best option for retaining our local air service long term and building up traffic so that government subsidies can eventually be reduced oreliminated. I urge the Department ofTransportation to award SilverAirways the designationto provide Mississippi airports essential air service.

Governor



### STATE OF MISSISSIPPI • OFFICE OFTHE GOVERNOR POSTOFFICE BOX 139 • JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39205 • TELEPHONE: (601) 359-3150 • FAX: (601) 359-3741 • www.govemorbryant.com
|  |  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |
|--|--|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  |  |
|  |  |  |
|  |  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  | ****Illustration           by:© *Joseph R. Tomelleri*****

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Designates Critical Habitat for Bull        Trout in Columbia and Klamath River Basins  

Deadline               Extended for Comments          on 5-year Review of Bull Trout

  |  |  |  |
|  |  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |  | **USFWS              Links**  USFWS Home Page**Pacific Region Home**/**Mountain-Prairie  Region**Draft Recovery Plan Contact  / Proposed    Critical Habitat ContactDisclaimer & Copyrights / Section    508 Accessibility |  |  |
|  |  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |  |  |  |  |  |  |
#### § 28.958 Payment of fees.

As soon as practicable after the last day of each calendar month, bills shall be rendered by officers in charge of testing laboratories to all persons from whom payment of fees and costs under the regulations in this subpart shall become due, provided that when desirable any bill may be rendered at an earlier date. Payment shall be by check or by draft or post office or express money order, payable to the order of “Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.”

[35 FR 8532, June 3, 1970. Redesignated at 46 FR 30075, June 5, 1981]
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JOANNE JENKINS and

QUENTON WOODEN,

Plaintiffs,

vs. CASE NO.: 4:03cv208-SPM/AK

CITY OF TALLAHASSEE,

CHIEF WALTER MCNEIL,

OFFICER CHUCK PERRY,

Defendants.

_________________________/

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO BIFURCATE AS MOOT

In light to the Court’s ruling on summary judgment in favor of the City of

Tallahassee and Chief McNeil, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the motion to bifurcate (doc. 106) is

denied as moot.

DONE AND ORDERED this 1st day of August, 2006.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 4:03-cv-00208-SPM-AK Document 167 Filed 08/01/06 Page 1 of 1
§ 3430.403 Eligibility. Unless otherwise specified in the RFA, eligible applicants for the grant program implemented under this subpart include: ( a ) State agricultural experiment stations;
( b ) Colleges and universities (including junior colleges offering an associate's degree);
( c ) University research foundations;
( d ) Other research institutions and organizations;
( e ) Federal agencies;
( f ) National laboratories;
( g ) Private organizations or corporations;
( h ) Individuals; and
( i ) Any group consisting of 2 or more entities identified in paragraphs (a) through (i) of this section.
```

[108th Congress Public Law 338]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ338.108]

[[Page 118 STAT. 1359]]

Public Law 108-338
108th Congress

                                 An Act

 
    To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to convey to the New Hope 
Cemetery Association certain land in the State of Arkansas for use as a 
             cemetery. <<NOTE: Oct. 18, 2004 -  [S. 1537]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF PROPERTY IN POPE COUNTY, ARKANSAS.

    (a) <<NOTE: Deadline.>> Conveyance on Condition Subsequent.--Not 
later than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, subject to 
valid existing rights and the condition stated in subsection (c), the 
Secretary of Agriculture, acting through the Chief of the Forest Service 
(referred to in this section as the ``Secretary''), shall convey to the 
New Hope Cemetery Association (referred to in this section as the 
``association''), for no consideration, all right, title, and interest 
of the United States in and to the parcel of land described in 
subsection (b).

    (b) Description of Land.--The parcel of land referred to in 
subsection (a) is the parcel of National Forest System land (including 
any improvements on the land) that--
            (1) is known as ``New Hope Cemetery Tract 6686c'';
            (2) consists of approximately 1.1 acres; and
            (3) is more particularly described as a portion of the SE 
        \1/4\ of the NW \1/4\ of section 30, T. 11, R. 17W, Pope County, 
        Arkansas.

    (c) Condition on Use of Land.--
            (1) In general.--The association shall use the parcel 
        conveyed under subsection (a) as a cemetery.
            (2) Reversion.--If the Secretary, after notice to the 
        association and an opportunity for a hearing, makes a finding 
        that the association has used or permitted the use of the parcel 
        for any purpose other than the purpose specified in paragraph 
        (1), and the association fails to discontinue that use, title to

[[Page 118 STAT. 1360]]

        the parcel shall, at the option of the Secretary, revert to the 
        United States, to be administered by the Secretary.

    Approved October 18, 2004.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 1537:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 108-654 (Comm. on Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 149 (2003):
                                    Nov. 24, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.
                                                        Vol. 150 (2004):
                                    Sept. 28, considered and passed 
                                        House.

                                  <all>
```
```

[108th Congress Public Law 434]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ434.108]

[[Page 118 STAT. 2614]]

Public Law 108-434
108th Congress

                            Joint Resolution

 
 Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2005, and 
     for other purposes. <<NOTE: Dec. 3, 2004 -  [H.J. Res. 115]>> 

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law 108-309 is 
further amended by striking the date specified in section 
107(c) <<NOTE: Ante, p. 2338.>> and inserting the following: ``December 
8, 2004''.

    Approved December 3, 2004.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.J. Res. 115:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):
            Nov. 24, considered and passed House and Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:93-cr-01016-MP

ABRA J THOMAS,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 250, Mr. Thomas' Motion for Early Termination

of Supervised Release. Under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(1), a Court may terminate a term of

supervised release and discharge the defendant released at any time after the expiration of one

year of supervised release, if it is satisfied that such action is warranted by the conduct of the

defendant released and the interest of justice. The Court has consulted with probation and has

reviewed Defendant's motion and his record on supervision, and determines that early

termination is not warranted by defendant's conduct or the interest of justice. Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

Doc. 250, Mr. Thomas' Motion for Early Termination of Supervised Release, is denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 11th day of March, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
H. R. 255 

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen 

An Act 

To amend certain definitions contained in the Provo River Project Transfer Act 

for purposes of clarifying certain property descriptions, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. CLARIFYING CERTAIN PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONS IN 

PROVO RIVER PROJECT TRANSFER ACT. 

(a) PLEASANT GROVE PROPERTY.—Section 2(4)(A) of the Provo 

River Project Transfer Act (Public Law 108–382; 118 Stat. 2212) 

is amended by striking ‘‘of enactment of this Act’’ and inserting 

‘‘on which the parcel is conveyed under section 3(a)(2)’’. 

(b) PROVO RESERVOIR CANAL.—Section 2(5) of the Provo River 

Project Transfer Act (Public Law 108–382; 118 Stat. 2212) is 

amended— 

(1) by striking ‘‘canal, and any associated land, rightsof-way, and facilities’’ and inserting ‘‘water conveyance facility 

historically known as the Provo Reservoir Canal and all associated bridges, fixtures, structures, facilities, lands, interests in 

land, and rights-of-way held,’’; 

(2) by inserting ‘‘and forebay’’ after ‘‘Diversion Dam’’; 

(3) by inserting ‘‘near the Jordan Narrows to the point 

where water is discharged to the Welby-Jacob Canal and the 

Utah Lake Distributing Canal’’ after ‘‘Penstock’’; and 

(4) by striking ‘‘of enactment of this Act’’ and inserting 

‘‘on which the Provo Reservoir Canal is conveyed under section 

3(a)(1)’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)

I, Richard Heyse,
certify that:

1. the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Innophos, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided Innophos, Inc. and will be retained by Innophos, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to
update the foregoing certification except as required by law.

Date: August 10, 2007



/S/ RICHARD HEYSERichard HeyseVice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to the requirements of 18
U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as a part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### § 29.2566 Undried.

The condition of unfermented tobacco which has not been air-dried or steam-dried.

[37 FR 13626, July 12, 1972. Redesignated at 49 FR 16757, Apr. 20, 1984 and 51 FR 40406, Nov. 7, 1986]
EXHIBIT 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









In connection with the Annual Report of Datawatch Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Murray P. Fish, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/ Murray P. Fish

Murray P. Fish

Chief Financial Officer

December 17, 2010
§ 322.5 General requirements. ( a ) All shipments of bees and honeybee germ plasm imported into the United States under this subpart must be shipped directly to the United States from an approved region.
( b ) *Adult honeybees.* ( 1 ) You may import adult honeybees under this subpart only from regions listed in § 322.4(a).
( 2 ) The honeybees must be package bees or queens with attending adult bees.
( c ) *Honeybee germ plasm.* You may import honeybee germ plasm under this subpart only from regions listed in § 322.4(b).
( d ) *Bees other than honeybees.* ( 1 ) You may import live adult bees or live brood and essential nest substrate under this subpart only from regions listed in § 322.4(c).
( 2 ) The live bees or brood must belong to one of the following species: ( i ) Bumblebees of the species *Bombus impatiens*;
( ii ) Bumblebees of the species *Bombus occidentalis*;
( iii ) Alfalfa leafcutter bee (*Megachile rotundata*);
( iv ) Blue orchard bee (*Osmia lignaria*); or
( v ) Horn-faced bee (*Osmia cornifrons*).
( 3 ) If you want to import species of bees other than those listed in paragraph (d)(2) of this section, refer to subpart C of this part, “Importation of Restricted Organisms,” for requirements.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENSACOLA DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Case No. 3:19-cv-03620-MCR-HTC 

 ) 

ANITA S. PHILLIPS and ) 

WAYNE L. PHILLIPS, ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL 

Because this matter has settled and because Defendants Wayne and Anita 

Phillips have satisfied their financial obligations under the settlement, the United 

States dismisses this case with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

41(a)(1)(A).    

Dated: December 17, 2020 

 Respectfully submitted, 

RICHARD E. ZUCKERMAN 

Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General 

By: 

/s/ Robert S. Silverblatt 

ROBERT S. SILVERBLATT 

Virginia Bar Number 85506 

CHRISTOPHER J. COULSON 
New York Bar Number 5162383 

Trial Attorneys, Tax Division 

U.S. Department of Justice 

Post Office Box 14198 

Ben Franklin Station 

Washington, D.C. 20044 

Telephone: (202) 514-8682 (Silverblatt) 

 (202) 353-0061 (Coulson) 

Facsimile: (202) 514-9868 

Robert.S.Silverblatt@usdoj.gov 

Christopher.J.Coulson@usdoj.gov 

Of Counsel

LAWRENCE KEEFE 

United States Attorney 

Respectfully submitted, 

 

/s/Lawrence R. Kemm 

 LAWRENCE R. KEMM 

 Florida Bar No. 0064323 

BRANDON P. FAULKNER 

Florida Bar No. 58560 

CHAD M. VANDERHOEF 

 Florida Bar No. 109595 

 HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP 

 100 North Tampa Street, Suite 4100 

 Tampa, Florida 33602 

 Telephone: (813) 227-6311 

 Facsimile: (813) 229-0134 

 Larry.Kemm@hklaw.com 

Brandon.Faulkner@hklaw.com

Chad.Vanderhoef@hklaw.com 

Attorneys for Defendants Anita S. Phillips and 

Wayne L. Phillips
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on this 17th day of December 2020, I electronically filed 

the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system, 

which will provide notice to counsel of record. 

/s/ Robert S. Silverblatt 

ROBERT S. SILVERBLATT 

Trial Attorney 

United States Department of Justice, Tax Division
#### § 29.2544 Resweated.

The condition of tobacco which has passed through a second fermentation under abnormally high temperatures or refermented with a relatively high percentage of moisture. Resweated includes tobacco which has been dipped or reconditioned after its first fermentation and put through a forced or artificial sweat.

[37 FR 13626, July 12, 1972. Redesignated at 49 FR 16757, Apr. 20, 1984]
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 1:88-cr-01007-MP-AK

RICHARD KEITH WILLIAMS,

Defendant.

___________________________/

O R D E R 

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 1060, Report and Recommendation of Magistrate 

Judge Kornblum, recommending that Defendant's Petition to Vacate Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255,

Doc. 1058, and Defendant's Motion for Appropriate Relief Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, Doc.

1059, be denied. The Magistrate Judge filed the Report and Recommendation Friday, July 15,

2005. The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been

afforded an opportunity to file objections. Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section

636(b)(1), this Court must make a de novo review of those portions to which an objection has

been made. In this instance, however, no objections were made. Therefore, having considered

the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation

should be ADOPTED.

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated

by reference in this order.

2. Defendant's Petition to Petition to Vacate Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, Doc. 1058, is

DENIED.

3. Defendant's Motion for Appropriate Relief Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, Doc.

1059, is DENIED.

Case 1:88-cr-01007-MW-GRJ Document 1062 Filed 08/19/05 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 1:88-cr-01007-MP-AK

DONE AND ORDERED this 19th day of August, 2005

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:88-cr-01007-MW-GRJ Document 1062 Filed 08/19/05 Page 2 of 2
Case No.: 3:20-cv-5485-MCR-HTC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

DARLENE KITT,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:20-cv-5485-MCR-HTC

ANDREW SAUL,

Defendant.

/

ORDER

The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on November 12, 

2021 (ECF Doc. 18). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant 

to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). There have been no timely filed 

objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the record, I have 

determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF Doc. 18) is 

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED, and this action is 

DISMISSED. 

Case 3:20-cv-05485-MCR-HTC Document 19 Filed 01/10/22 Page 1 of 2
Case No.: 3:20-cv-5485-MCR-HTC

3. Judgement is entered in favor of the Commissioner pursuant to sentence 

four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).

4. The clerk is directed to close the case file. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 10th day of January 2022.

 M. Casey Rodgers

 M. CASEY RODGERS

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-05485-MCR-HTC Document 19 Filed 01/10/22 Page 2 of 2
# L_2020255EN.01000101.xml

| 5.8.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 255/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.8.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 255/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2020/1154

of 29 July 2020

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications ‘Miód spadziowy z Beskidu Wyspowego’ (PDO)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Poland’s application to register the name ‘Miód spadziowy z Beskidu Wyspowego’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Poland’s application to register the name ‘Miód spadziowy z Beskidu Wyspowego’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Miód spadziowy z Beskidu Wyspowego’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Miód spadziowy z Beskidu Wyspowego’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Miód spadziowy z Beskidu Wyspowego’ (PDO) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.4 – Other products of animal origin (eggs, honey, various dairy products except butter, etc.), as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 July 2020.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 336, 7.10.2019, p. 7.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---