alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Income  &  Growth
Fund  26 LLC (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended
June  30,  2006,  as  filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission  on  the date hereof (the "Report"), the  undersigned,
Robert  P.  Johnson, President of AEI Fund Management XXI,  Inc.,
the  Managing Member of the Company, and Patrick W. Keene,  Chief
Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc., each certify,
pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section  906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Company.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing Member
                              August 11, 2006



                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing Member
                              August 11, 2006
#### § 295.3 Informational and educational publications.

FNS publishes a wide variety of informational and educational periodicals, pamphlets, brochures, leaflets, guides, and educational aids explaining the operation of FNS food assistance programs. For more information concerning FNS publications and how to obtain them, write the Director, Public Information Staff, Food and Nutrition Service, USDA, 3101 Park Center Drive, Alexandria, VA 22302-1500.
###### Editorial Note on Part 3401

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 3401 appear at 76 FR 4806, Jan. 27, 2011.

#### § 3401.15 Availability of information.

Information regarding the peer review process will be made available to the extent permitted under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552), the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a.), and implementing Departmental regulations (part 1 of this title).
#### § 3300.94 Appeals.

Any organization aggrieved by an action in connection with this rule may obtain a review of such action by submitting pertinent information by letter to the Administrator. The decision of the Administrator is the final agency action.
§ 3100.43 Policy. ( a ) The nonrenewable cultural environment of our country constitutes a valuable and treasured portion of the national heritage of the American people. The Department of Agriculture is committed to the management—identification, protection, preservation, interpretation, evaluation and nomination—of our prehistoric and historic cultural resources for the benefit of all people of this and future generations.
( b ) The Department supports the cultural resource goals expressed in Federal legislation. Executive orders, and regulations.
( c ) The Department supports the preservation and protection of farms, rural landscapes, and rural communities.
( d ) The Department is committed to consideration of the needs of American Indians, Eskimo, Aleut, and Native Hawaiians in the practice of their traditional religions.
( e ) The Department will aggressively implement these policies to meet goals for the positive management of the cultural environment.
#### § 29.2254 Brown colors.

A group of colors ranging from a reddish brown to yellowish brown. These colors vary from low to medium saturation and from very low to medium brilliance. As used in these standards, the range is expressed as light brown (L), medium brown (F), and dark brown (D).
§ 3201.109 Intermediates—Chemicals. ( a ) *Definition.* Intermediates—Chemicals are those used as reactants for organic synthesis reactions rather than for their functional properties in a chemical mixture; those used as building block chemicals and secondary chemicals such as glycerol, succinic acid, propanediol, and monomers such as lactic acid and propylene; those used for specific functional properties during manufacturing of other products such as pH regulators, flocculants, precipitants, neutralizing agents, emulsifiers, viscosity reducers, rheology modifiers, adhesion agents, detergents, wetting agents, foaming agents, or dispersants; those that are added to end-use products for their specific functional properties including polyols, polymers, and solvents for thinning and drying applications but excluding solvents used for cleaning; and those used for dyes, pigments, and scents including flavorings for non-food products such as lip balm.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The Federal preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 22 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than July 10, 2019, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased Intermediates—Chemicals. By that date, Federal agencies responsible for drafting or reviewing specifications for products to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased Intermediates—Chemicals.
[83 FR 31848, July 10, 2018]
Directors' Fee Schedule.



 Exhibit 10.18 
  
 2005 Directors’ Fees Schedule 
  

				
	 Annual Retainer
	  	$	17,000
		
	 Board Meetings
	  	 	 
	 Attendance per meeting
	  	$	800
		
	 Committee Meetings
	  	 	 
	 Attendance per meeting (non-chairperson) (held on same day as a board meeting)
	  	$	300
	 Attendance per meeting (chairperson) (held on same day as board meeting)
	  	$	375
	 Attendance per meeting (non-chairperson)
	  	$	1,200
	 Attendance per meeting (chairperson)
	  	$	1,500
		
	 Telephonic Meetings
	  	 	 
	 Telephonic meetings (non-chairperson)
	  	$	250
		
	 Telephonic meetings (chairperson)
	  	$	250
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THERMO
TERRATECH INC.'S QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 28,
1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-04-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                          11,309
<SECURITIES>                                    34,664
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,851
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,613
<INVENTORY>                                      2,447
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               155,046
<PP&E>                                         135,422
<DEPRECIATION>                                  48,903
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 357,459
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           87,249
<BONDS>                                        152,994
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,830
<OTHER-SE>                                      79,445
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   357,459
<SALES>                                          7,409
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                72,519
<CGS>                                            6,131
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   57,951
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   222
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (49)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,133
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,399
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,332
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,332
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 2, 2006,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Youm Huh, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/ Youm Huh                         
|Youm Huh                             
|Chief Executive Officer and President
|May 15, 2006                         

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 301.76-9 Inspection of regulated nursery stock.

All nursery stock intended for interstate movement for immediate export from an area quarantined for citrus greening, must be inspected by an inspector[1] no more than 72 hours prior to movement. The person who desires to move the articles interstate must notify the inspector as far in advance of the desired interstate movement as possible. The articles must be inspected at the place and in the manner the inspector designates as necessary to comply with this subpart. If the inspector has reason to believe that the interstate movement of the articles may lead to the artificial spread of citrus greening or Asian citrus psyllid, he or she may deny issuance of a limited permit for interstate movement of the article or take other remedial measures to prohibit such spread.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0363)

[75 FR 34332, June 17, 2010, as amended at 76 FR 23457, 23459, Apr. 27, 2011; 77 FR 59712, Oct. 1, 2012; 87 FR 80011, Dec. 29, 2022]

###### Footnotes -
  301.76-9

[1] Inspectors are assigned to local offices of APHIS, which are listed in local telephone directories. Information concerning local offices may also be obtained from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Plant Protection and Quarantine, Domestic and Emergency Operations, 4700 River Road Unit 134, Riverdale, MD 20737-1236.
George L. 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 15, 2014

No. 04-12-00755-CV

Roger L. GRAHAM, John B. Graham, John Regmund, Glenn Regmund, Wilma Regmund, 

Raellen Regmund Mattingly, Rayanne Regmund Chesser, Albert O. Menn, and Irene C. Menn,

Appellants

v.

George L. PROCHASKA, Jr., Patricia Prochaska Holland, Jeanette Prochaska Mazza, Dawn 

Prochaska Snyder, Frederick James Prochaska, II and Rebecca Prochaska Willis,

Appellees

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Karnes County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12-02-00023-CVK

Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to File Motion for Rehearing or 

Reconsideration En Banc is GRANTED. The motion is due on February 14, 2014.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of January, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
PUBLIC LAW 106–218—JUNE 20, 2000 114 STAT. 345

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3639:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):

May 23, considered and passed House.

June 8, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 106–218

106th Congress

An Act

To designate the Federal building located at 2201 C Street, Northwest, in the

District of Columbia, currently headquarters for the Department of State, as

the ‘‘Harry S Truman Federal Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The Federal building located at 2201 C Street, Northwest,

in the District of Columbia, currently headquarters for the Department of State, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Harry S

Truman Federal Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the Federal building referred

to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Harry

S Truman Federal Building’’.

Approved June 20, 2000.

22 USC 2713 and

note.

22 USC 2713

note.

June 20, 2000

[H.R. 3639]
```

[Federal Register: March 17, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 51)]
[Notices]               
[Page 12807]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr17mr10-114]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

 
Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(Formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending March 6, 2010

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations. (See 14 CFR 301.201 et seq.).
    The due date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motions to 
Modify Scope are set forth below for each application. Following the 
Answer period DOT may process the application by expedited procedures. 
Such procedures may consist of the adoption of a show-cause order, a 
tentative order, or in appropriate cases a final order without further 
proceedings.

    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2000-6796.
    Date Filed: March 1, 2010.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: March 22, 2010.
    Description: Application of Aerolineas Santo Domingo, S.A. 
requesting renewal of its exemption and a foreign air carrier permit to 
conduct scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and 
mail between the Dominican Republic and the United States.

    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2010-0058.
    Date Filed: March 5, 2010.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: March 26, 2010.
    Description: Application of Dynamic Airways, LLC d/b/a Dynamic 
Aviation (``Airways'') requesting a certificate of public convenience 
and necessity authorizing Airways to engage in interstate charter air 
transportation of persons, property and mail.

Barbara J. Hairston,
Supervisory Dockets Officer, Docket Operations, Alternate Federal 
Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2010-5807 Filed 3-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
98- 1406.

#### State ex rel. Heyward v. Borchert.

In Procedendo. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
#### Barbara Marans, Respondent, v. Leonard Marans, Appellant.

Order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated April 29, 1966, modified by (1) striking out the provisions directing defendant to pay temporary alimony and counsel fees and (2) providing that plaintiff’s motion is denied as to temporary alimony and that her application for allowance and fixation of counsel fees is referred to the trial court for determination. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. It appears there exists a subsisting separation agreement, the validity of which cannot be determined on conflietnig affidavits *(Brock*v. *Brock,*1 A D 2d 973, and cases there cited). Until such agreement is set aside, temporary alimony and counsel fees for the wife may not be awarded *(Kulok*v. *Kulok,*20 A D 2d 568). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Rabin and Munder, JJ., concur.
#### § 3300.82 Issuance of certificate.

The ATP manager will evaluate documents received and, for equipment deemed qualified, will issue a U.S. ATP certificate to the applicant within 30 days of receipt of the application and any relevant information required. The certificate will be in the format prescribed in ATP, Annex 1, Appendix 3. For equipment deemed not qualified, the applicant will be advised of reasons for non-qualification within 30 days of receipt of an application and any relevant information required.
#### FLYNN, Appellant, v. SMITH et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

October 10, 1906.)

Action by Charles Flynn against Charles W. I Smith and Asa C. Sherman.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment of county and justice courts reversed, with costs in all courts.

WILLIAMS, J., dissents.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE>    5
       
<S>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>            12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                      DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                217,000
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                           9,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      226,000
<PP&E>                             23,674,000
<DEPRECIATION>                     (5,501,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     18,426,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 436,000
<BONDS>                                     0
<COMMON>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                         17,990,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       18,426,000
<SALES>                             2,783,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    2,828,000
<CGS>                                 956,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         956,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      995,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       877,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         0
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                          877,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           12.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0
        

</TABLE>
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2564 

To extend the additional duty on ethanol. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 27, 2013 

Mr. RANGEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To extend the additional duty on ethanol. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF ADDITIONAL DUTY ON ETH4 ANOL. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Heading 9901.00.50 of the Har6 monized Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended 

7 by striking ‘‘1/1/2012’’ in the effective period column and 

8 inserting ‘‘1/1/2016’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2564 IH

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. John T. Fryson, Appellant, v. Edward M. Fay, as Warden of Green Haven Prison, Respondent.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated January 19, 1965, reversed, on the law, without costs, and proceeding remitted to the court below for the purpose of: (1) holding a further hearing, (2) assigning counsel to represent relator on such hearing and (3) making a determination *de novo*on the basis of the proof adduced upon such hearing. No questions of fact were considered. It was error for the court below to have disregarded relator’s request that he be assigned counsel to represent him (see *People*v. *Hughes,*15 N Y 2d 172). Uglietta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hopkins and Munder, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.9e


                             FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE
                             STERLING CHEMICALS ESOP


                  WHEREAS, there is reserved to the Company the right to amend
the Sterling Chemicals ESOP (the "Plan"); and

                  WHEREAS, the Company deems it advisable to amend the Plan in
the manner hereafter set forth;

                  NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended effective as of
December 31, 1998 as follows:

                  "Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, with
                  respect to a participant who attains age 70 1/2 after 1998
                  (other than an owner, within the meaning of IRC Section 318),
                  benefits shall not be paid or begin prior to the participant's
                  termination of employment with the Company and all members of
                  its controlled group of employers. Except to the extent
                  required by IRC Section 401(a)(9), the Plan shall not preclude
                  such a participant from receiving benefits in any of the same
                  optional forms (except for the difference in the timing of the
                  commencement of payments) that would have been available had
                  the participant retired in the calendar year in which the
                  participant attained age 70 1/2."

                  All terms used herein that are defined in the Plan shall have
the same meanings given to such terms in the Plan, except as otherwise expressly
provided herein.

                  Except as amended and modified hereby, the Plan shall continue
in full force and effect and the Plan and this instrument shall be read, taken
and construed as one and the same instrument.

                  This instrument may be executed in several counterparts, each
of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which shall constitute but one
and the same instrument which may be evidenced by any one counterpart.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this instrument to
be executed effective for all purposes as provided above.


                                    STERLING CHEMICALS, INC.


                                    By:
                                       ---------------------
                                    Name:
                                         -------------------
                                    Title:
                                          ------------------