alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

ALBERT T. OWENS, JR, 

Plaintiff, 

v. Case No. 5:20-cv-148-RV/MJF 

C. HARRELL, et al., 

Defendants. 

 / 

ORDER 

 This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report 

and Recommendation dated September 23, 2020 (ECF No. 21). The parties have 

been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded 

an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 

636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. 

 Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that 

the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. 

 Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this order. 

Case 5:20-cv-00148-RV-MJF Document 23 Filed 10/22/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

5:20-cv-148-RV/MJF 

2. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§§ 1915(A)(b)(1) and 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), for maliciousness and abuse of the judicial 

process. 

3. The clerk of the court shall close the case file. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of October 2020. 

 s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON 

 SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 5:20-cv-00148-RV-MJF Document 23 Filed 10/22/20 Page 2 of 2
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

144 CA 10-00139 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT SILLS AND AUDREY ELAINE SILLS, AS CO-EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF ANGELINE V. SILLS, DECEASED, PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
FLEET NATIONAL BANK, JOAN ROYSTON AND KIRK RICHARDSON, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS.

------------------------------------------- AUDREY PATRONE PEARTREE, GUARDIAN AD LITEM, RESPONDENT.

------------------------------------------- ROBERT SILLS AND AUDREY ELAINE SILLS, AS CO-EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF ANGELINE V. SILLS, DECEASED, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

V
FLEET BANK AND JOAN ROYSTON, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

------------------------------------------- AUDREY PATRONE PEARTREE, GUARDIAN AD LITEM, RESPONDENT.

------------------------------------------- ROBERT SILLS AND AUDREY ELAINE SILLS, AS CO-EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF ANGELINE V. SILLS, DECEASED, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

V
JOAN ROYSTON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

------------------------------------------- AUDREY PATRONE PEARTREE, GUARDIAN AD LITEM, RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 5.)

GATES & ADAMS, P.C., ROCHESTER (MICHAEL STEINBERG OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS AND PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.
MCDONOUGH & ARTZ, P.C., BINGHAMTON (PHILIP J. ARTZ OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT AND DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT JOAN ROYSTON.
THE WOLFORD LAW FIRM LLP, ROCHESTER (ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.-2- 144 CA 10-00139
UNDERBERG & KESSLER LLP, ROCHESTER (PAUL V. NUNES OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT FLEET NATIONAL BANK AND DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT FLEET BANK.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Steuben County (Peter C. Bradstreet, A.J.), entered December 31, 2009. The order granted the application of Audrey Patrone Peartree, as guardian ad litem for decedent Angeline V. Sills, to retain Elizabeth A. Wolford as counsel to represent her in an appeal of the court’s decision and order dated September 10, 2009, and ordered that all reasonable fees and disbursements incurred by the guardian ad litem in that appeal be paid for by the Estate of Angeline V. Sills.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously vacated without costs and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Steuben County, for further proceedings in accordance with the same Memorandum as in Sills v Fleet Natl. Bank ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Feb. 18, 2011]).

Entered: February 18, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
#### § 301.86-9 Costs and charges.

The services of the inspector during normal business hours (8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except holidays) will be furnished without cost. APHIS will not be responsible for any costs or charges incident to inspections or compliance with the provisions of the quarantine and regulations in this subpart, other than for the services of the inspector.
#### § 295.2 Organizational description.

The description of the central and field organization of FNS is published as a notice in the Federal Register and may be revised from time to time in like manner. Such description contains a listing of FNS headquarters and field organizational units and their functions.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 24, 2024

NO. 03

- 23

- 00874

- CV

Kenneth A. Burnett II , Appellant

v.

C IM Management Group , Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE B YRNE, JUSTICES SMITH AND THEOFANIS

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

– OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on November 8, 202 3

. Having

reviewed the record

, it appears that the C ourt lacks jurisdiction over the appeal

. Therefore, the

C ourt dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction

. Because appellant is indigent and u nable to

pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I,Frank P. Filipps, certify that:

1.   I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Clayton Holdings, Inc.;

2.   Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

(b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SECtransition instructions contained in SEC Release No. 34-47986];

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

5.   The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
| Date: November 10, 2006 |                      |
|-------------------------|---------------------------|
|                    |                      |
|                    | /s/ Frank P. Filipps      |   |
|                    | Frank P. Filipps          |
|                    | *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
EXHIBIT 4
#### § 29.1072 Type 13.

That type of flue-cured tobacco commonly known as Southeastern Flue-cured or South Carolina Flue-cured, produced principally in the coastal plains section of South Carolina and the southeastern counties of North Carolina, south of the South River.

[42 FR 21092, Apr. 25, 1977. Redesignated at 47 FR 51721, Nov. 17, 1982, 48 FR 29671, June 28, 1983, 49 FR 16756, Apr. 20, 1984, and 51 FR 25027, July 10, 1986]
(162 App. Div. 794)

#### COHN v. ANSONIA REALTY CO.

(No 5750.)

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 5, 1914.)

Appeal from Trial Term, New York County.

Action by Joan Cohn against the Ansonia Realty Company. From a judgment for plaintiff and denial of new trial, defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

Argued before INGRAHAM, P. J., and McLAUGHLIN, CLARKE, SCOTT, and HOTCHKISS, JJ.

George J. McDonnell, of New York City, for appellant.

Wales F. Severance, of New York City, for respondent.

SCOTT, J.

This action was tried with that of Aida Cohn, who was plaintiff’s wife.

*42For the reason stated in the case of said Aida Cohn against the same defendant, 148 N. Y. Supp. 39, this judgment and order should be affirmed, with costs.

INGRAHAM, P. J., and CLARKE and HOTCHKISS, JJ., concur.

McLAUGHLIN, J.

(dissenting). This action was brought to recover damages for loss of services of plaintiff’s wife. It was tried with her action to recover damages for her injuries. Plaintiff had a recovery of $1,000.

For the reasons stated by me in the opinion in Aida Cohn v. Ansonia Realty Company (decided herewith), I think this judgment and order should be reversed, and a new trial granted.
#### § 29.6091 Rule 5.

Tobacco leaves shall be placed straight in bundles or bales of normal weight, size, and shape with the butts out and tips overlapping from 6 to 8 inches or sufficiently to make a level, solid, and uniform pack. The sides of the bundles shall be completely covered with paper, or other suitable protective material, and tightly bound with not less than three large twines spaced so that the tobacco will be held securely together. Improperly packed tobacco shall be designated as “No—G.”
#### § 3430.200 Applicability of regulations.

The regulations in this subpart apply to the program authorized under section 412 of the Agricultural Research, Extension, and Education Reform Act of 1998 (7 U.S.C. 7632).
§ 319.41 Notice of quarantine. ( a ) The fact has been determined by the Secretary of Agriculture, and notice given, that dangerous plant pests, including the so-called European corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis Hubn.), and also other dangerous insects, as well as plant diseases not heretofore widely prevalent or distributed within and throughout the United States, exist, as to one or more of such pests, in Europe, Asia, Africa, Dominion of Canada, Mexico, Central and South America, and other foreign countries and localities, and may be introduced into this country through importations of the stalks or other parts of Indian corn or maize, broomcorn, and related plants.
( b ) To prevent the introduction of these plant pests, the following articles may not be imported into the United States except in accordance with this subpart: The raw or unmanufactured stalk and all other parts of Indian corn or maize (*Zea mays* L.), broomcorn (*Andropogon sorghum* var. *technicus*), sweet sorghums (*Andropogon sorghum*), grain sorghums (*Andropogon sorghum*), Sudan grass (*Andropogon sorghum* sudanensis), Johnson grass (*Andropogon halepensis*), sugarcane (*Saccharum officinarum*), including Japanese varieties, pearl millet (*Pennisetum glaucum*), napier grass (*Pennisetum purpureum*), teosinte (*Euchlaena luxurians*), and jobs-tears (*Coix lachryma-Jobi*).
( c ) The Administrator may authorize the importation of articles otherwise prohibited under paragraph (b) of this section under conditions specified in a controlled import permit issued in accordance with § 319.6.
( d ) The importation of plants (including any plant parts) of any of the taxa listed in paragraph (b) of this section that are for planting or capable of being planted is restricted under Subpart H—Plants for Planting of this part.
( e ) As used in this subpart, unless the context otherwise requires, the term “United States” means the States, the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands of the United States.
[24 FR 10788, Dec. 29, 1959, as amended at 66 FR 21056, Apr. 27, 2001; 78 FR 25571, May 2, 2013; 83 FR 11865, Mar. 19, 2018; 84 FR 2429, Feb. 7, 2019]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 VS CASE NO. 1:92-CR-01025-01 MMP 

 TURNER BAKER

FINANCIAL REFERRAL AND ORDER

Regarding release of funds for: Fine, X Restitution, Filing Fee, Attorney Admission Fee,

 Copy Fee, Bond, Other (Specify) 

By: Turner Baker #09661-017 (Payee)

Address: Coleman, USP

PO Box 1033

Coleman, FL 33521

Receipt Number B031207 Date of Receipt 4/2/07 

Motion: N/A

Explanation: A review of the payment records for Mr. Turner indicates an overpayment of $50.00. 

According to the court dockets and financial records, Mr. Turner does not owe any additional money

and should be reimbursed $50.00.

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, Clerk of Court

Prepared by: ___s/Philip Detweiler___________

 Philip Detweiler, Financial Specialist Date: April 23, 2007

Referred by: ,Deputy Clerk

ORDER OF COURT

It is ORDERED this 24th day of April , 2007, that the Clerk refund the

identified funds to the payee.

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 MAURICE M. PAUL, SENIOR 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Adopted: 12/03/99

Case 1:92-cr-01025-MP Document 203 Filed 04/24/07 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2581 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2581

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act with respect to permit 
               requirements for dredged or fill material.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 28, 2013

   Mr. Hurt (for himself, Mr. Costa, and Mr. Michaud) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
                           and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act with respect to permit 
               requirements for dredged or fill material.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Preserving Rural Resources Act of 
2013''.

SEC. 2. PERMITS FOR DREDGED OR FILL MATERIAL.

    Section 404(f) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 
U.S.C. 1344(f)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``Except as provided in 
        paragraph (2) of this subsection, the discharge'' and inserting 
        ``The discharge''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking ``having as its purpose 
        bringing an area of the navigable waters into a use to which it 
        was not previously subject, where the flow or circulation of 
        navigable waters may be impaired or the reach of such waters be 
        reduced,'' and inserting ``having as its purpose bringing an 
        area into a use not described in paragraph (1)''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 3201.55 Ink removers and cleaners. ( a ) *Definition.* Chemical products designed to remove ink, haze, glaze, and other residual ink contaminants from the surfaces of equipment, such as rollers, used in the textile and printing industries.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 79 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than October 18, 2011, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased ink removers and cleaners. By that date, Federal agencies that have the responsibility for drafting or reviewing specifications for items to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased ink removers and cleaners.
[75 FR 63701, Oct. 18, 2010]
Specimen Common Stock Certificate



 Exhibit 4.1 
  



 
  
 

 
  

					
	NEW COMMON	 	 	 	 
	 THIS CERTIFICATE IS TRANSFERABLE IN
 RIDGEFIELD PARK, NJ AND
 NEW YORK, NY
	 	INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE
STATE OF DELAWARE	 	 SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS
 CUSIP 896106 20 0


  
 THIS
CERTIFIES THAT 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 IS THE OWNER OF 
  
 FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK, $.01 PAR VALUE PER
SHARE, OF 
  
 TRICO MARINE SERVICES, INC. 
 transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof, in person or by duly authorized attorney, upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed or
accompanied by a proper assignment. This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be endorsed by the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers and to be sealed with the facsimile seal of the Corporation. 
  
 Dated: 
  

					
			
	/s/ Thomas E. Fairley	 	 	 	 COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED:
 MELLON INVESTOR SERVICES LLC
 TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR

	 PRESIDENT
 AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
			
	/s/ Trevor Turbidy	 	 	 	BY
	VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER	 	 	 	AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE

  
 AMERICAN BANK NOTE
COMPANY 
 711 ARMSTRONG LANE 
 COLUMBIA, TENNESSEE 38401 
 (931) 388-3003 
  
 / ETHER 19 / LIVE JOBS / T/ TRICO 18569 FC 
  
 PRODUCTION COORDINATOR:VERONICA GLIATTI 931-490-1706 
 PROOF OF FEBRUARY 1, 2005 
 TRICO MARINE SERVICES, INC. 
 TSB 18569 FC 
 Operator:                Ron 
 New 
 PLEASE INITIAL THE APPROPRIATE SELECTION FOR THIS PROOF:              OK AS IS
             OK WITH CHANGES              MAKE CHANGES AND SEND ANOTHER PROOF 
 Colors Selected for Printing: Logo is in All-Outline EPS format; Prints in 100% Black. Intaglio prints in SC-7 Dark Blue. 
  
 COLOR: This proof was printed from a digital file or artwork on a graphics quality, color
laser printer. It is a good representation of the color as it will appear on the final product. However, it is not an exact color rendition, and the final printed product may appear slightly different from the proof due to the difference between the
dyes and printing ink.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

JOSHUA DIGGINS,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:20cv5253/LAC/EMT

WILLIAM HALLFORD,

Defendant.

__________________________/

ORDER

The chief magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on July 27,

2020 (ECF No. 7). Plaintiff was furnished a copy of the Report and

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title

28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined it

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No.

7) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

Case 3:20-cv-05253-LC-EMT Document 9 Filed 09/11/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to

comply with an order of the court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 11th

 day of September, 2020.

 s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No.: 3:20cv5253/LAC/EMT

Case 3:20-cv-05253-LC-EMT Document 9 Filed 09/11/20 Page 2 of 2
Order entered September 26, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 12
- 01497
- CR
MICHAEL D'ANGELO MAS ON, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas T rial Court Cause No. 199
- 80929
- 10



### O RDER
The Court GRANTS appellant’s September 24, 2013 motion for extension of time to file appellant’s brief

. We ORDER the Clerk of the Court to file the brief tendered as of the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUST ICE
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ramon Reyes, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered on June 14, 1978, unanimously affirmed. Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. (See *Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur—Fein, J. P., Sullivan, Markewich, Silverman and Ross, JJ.
PUBLIC LAW 108–338—OCT. 18, 2004 118 STAT. 1359

Public Law 108–338

108th Congress

An Act

To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to convey to the New Hope Cemetery Association certain land in the State of Arkansas for use as a cemetery.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF PROPERTY IN POPE COUNTY,

ARKANSAS.

(a) CONVEYANCE ON CONDITION SUBSEQUENT.—Not later than

90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, subject to valid

existing rights and the condition stated in subsection (c), the Secretary of Agriculture, acting through the Chief of the Forest Service

(referred to in this section as the ‘‘Secretary’’), shall convey to

the New Hope Cemetery Association (referred to in this section

as the ‘‘association’’), for no consideration, all right, title, and

interest of the United States in and to the parcel of land described

in subsection (b).

(b) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The parcel of land referred to in

subsection (a) is the parcel of National Forest System land

(including any improvements on the land) that—

(1) is known as ‘‘New Hope Cemetery Tract 6686c’’;

(2) consists of approximately 1.1 acres; and

(3) is more particularly described as a portion of the SE 1⁄4 of the NW 1⁄4 of section 30, T. 11, R. 17W, Pope County,

Arkansas.

(c) CONDITION ON USE OF LAND.—

(1) IN GENERAL.—The association shall use the parcel conveyed under subsection (a) as a cemetery.

(2) REVERSION.—If the Secretary, after notice to the association and an opportunity for a hearing, makes a finding that

the association has used or permitted the use of the parcel

for any purpose other than the purpose specified in paragraph

(1), and the association fails to discontinue that use, title to

Deadline.

Oct. 18, 2004

[S. 1537]

118 STAT. 1360 PUBLIC LAW 108–338—OCT. 18, 2004

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1537:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 108–654 (Comm. on Resources).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:

Vol. 149 (2003): Nov. 24, considered and passed Senate.

Vol. 150 (2004): Sept. 28, considered and passed House.

Æ

the parcel shall, at the option of the Secretary, revert to the

United States, to be administered by the Secretary.

Approved October 18, 2004.
Searched for **https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/ES-05-11052.pdf**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/ES-05-11052.pdf**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.