alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Bryan Henry et al., Respondents, v Roosevelt School District, Appellant.

[815 NYS2d 472]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Palmieri, J.), dated February 10, 2006, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The plaintiff Bryan Henry (hereinafter the plaintiff, an *955eighth-grade student, allegedly sustained personal injuries when he slipped and fell while playing touch football on a wet grass field during a physical education class. The plaintiff and his mother commenced the instant action alleging, inter alia, that the defendant was negligent in the maintenance of the subject field. The defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The Supreme Court denied the defendant’s motion. We reverse.

In support of its motion for summary judgment, the defendant made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see *Fintzi v New Jersey YMHA-YWHA Camps,*97 NY2d 669, 670 [2001]; *Sauer v Hebrew Inst. of Long Is.,*17 AD2d 245, 246 [1962], *affd without op*13 NY2d 913 [1963]). In opposition thereto, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see *generally Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]).

In light of the foregoing, we need not reach the defendant’s remaining contentions. Mastro, J.P., Rivera, Skelos and Covello, JJ., concur.
#### § 301.38-8 Costs and charges.

The services of an inspector[1] during normal business hours, Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., will be furnished without cost to persons requiring the services. The United States Department of Agriculture will not be responsible for any other costs or charges.

[54 FR 32791, Aug. 10, 1989; 54 FR 38494, Sept. 18, 1989; 87 FR 80005, Dec. 29, 2022]

###### Footnotes -
  301.38-8

[1] See footnote 1 in § 301.38-3.
#### In the Matter of Lawrence T. Kurlander, as District Attorney of Monroe County, Petitioner, v Donald J. Mark, as Judge of Monroe County Court, et al., Respondents.

Petition unanimously dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: At the request of Florida officials in June, 1980 one Giselle Billiski was arrested in New York State on a fugitive warrant and was brought before respondent, a Judge of Monroe County Court, for arraign-' ment. Billiski was released on bail fixed by the court. On several adjourned dates in July and August she duly appeared. On August 28 she was arraigned before the court on the New York Governor’s rendition warrant of extradition to Florida, on a charge of grand theft in the second degree. At that time by order to show cause Billiski instituted a habeas corpus proceeding returnable in Monroe County Court on September 8 (see CPL 570.24); and over objection of petitioner, the Monroe County District Attorney, she was continued on bail. Contending that the court was without jurisdiction to release Billiski on bail following her arraignment under the Governor’s rendition warrant (see CPL 570.38), the District Attorney instituted this article 78 proceeding for a writ of prohibition against such continuing release by respondent Mark. Although the rendition warrant is a part of a criminal proceeding, as to which thefe is no statutory provision for bail in this situation (see CPL 570.38), the statute expressly contemplates that the accused may apply for release through a habeas corpus proceeding (CPL 570.24; see *People ex rel. Corkran v Hyatt,*172 NY 176, affd 188 US 691). The latter proceeding is governed by CPLR 7009 (subd [e]) which expressly authorizes the court to admit such accused to bail, and respondent acted within his authority in admitting the accused to bail *(People ex rel. Pray v Allen,*63 AD2d 1056, mot for lv to app and for stay of extradition and for *continuance of*bail den 45 NY2d 774 [emphasis added]; *People ex rel. Hutchings v Mallon,*222 App Div 243; *People ex rel. Lewis v Commissioner of Correction of City of N. Y.,*100 Misc 2d 48, 56). Petitioner’s remedy, therefore, if any, is by appeal *(People ex rel. Weisenfeld [Cifone] v Warden, N. Y. Detention Facility at Riker’s Is.,*37 NY2d 760; *Matter of Roberts v County Ct. of Wyoming County,*34 NY2d 246, 248-249). (Art 78.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Cardamone, Schnepp, Doerr and Witmer, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

BRADLEY E. KLINE,

Respondent

v.

TRAVELERS PERSONAL SECURITY 

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 71 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 20th day of July, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Page 1 of 1

Case No. 5:20cv94-RH-MJF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

KAREN STRIPLING,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 5:20cv94-RH-MJF

JACKSON COUNTY

SHERIFF’S OFFICE et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and 

recommendation, ECF No. 15. No objections have been filed. Upon consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as the court’s 

opinion. The clerk must enter judgment stating, “This case is dismissed without 

prejudice.” The clerk must close the file.

SO ORDERED on November 21, 2020.

s/Robert L. Hinkle

United States District Judge

Case 5:20-cv-00094-RH-MJF Document 16 Filed 11/23/20 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Tuesday, November 23, 2010 at 2 p.m.

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.

Commissioner Paredes, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session, and determined that no earlier notice thereof was possible.

The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Tuesday, November 23, 2010 will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings; and

Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:

The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: November 18, 2010.

Elizabeth M. Murphy, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-29475 Filed 11-18-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
#### § 28.31 Denial of service.

The Administrator may for good cause, including the acts or practices set forth in § 28.32, debar any person, including the agents, officers, subsidiaries, or affiliates of such person, from any or all benefits of the Act for a specified period, after notice and opportunity for hearing has been afforded. Procedures outlined, or referred, in part 50 of this chapter (7 CFR 50.1 *et seq.*) shall govern proceedings under this section.

(Sec. 2, Pub. Res. 72-73, 47 Stat. 1621 (7 U.S.C. 51b); sec. 3c, Pub. L. 75-28, 50 Stat. 62 (7 U.S.C. 473c))

[42 FR 24712, May 16, 1977]
#### § 301.75-14 Costs and charges.

The services of the inspector shall be furnished without cost. The United States Department of Agriculture will not be responsible for any costs or charges incident to inspections or compliance with the provisions in this subpart, other than for the services of the inspector.

[50 FR 51231, Dec. 13, 1985. Redesignated at 55 FR 37450, Sept. 11, 1990]
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 223 (Friday, November 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 70952]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29214]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Proposal Review Panel for Physics; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: Columbia University FY11 Site Visit (1208).
    Date and Time: Thursday, December 2, 2010, 8:15 a.m.-6:45 p.m. 
Friday, December 3, 2010, 8:30 a.m.-2:30 p.m.
    Place: Columbia University, New York, NY.
    Type of Meeting: Partially Closed.
    Contact Person: Dr. Marvin Goldberg, Program Director for 
Elementary Particle Physics, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-7392.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide an evaluation concerning the 
proposal submitted to the National Science Foundation.

Agenda

Thursday-Dec. 2

8:15 a.m.-9 a.m. Executive session (closed)
9 a.m.-9:45 a.m. Lab overview (Shaevitz)
9:45 a.m.-10:30 a.m. Veritas, ACT (Humensky)
10:30 a.m.-10:45 a.m. Break
10:45 a.m.-11:30 a.m. MiniBoone/SciBoone (Shaevitz)
11:30 a.m.-12:15 p.m. Double Chooz (Camilleri)
12:15 p.m.-1:15 p.m. Lunch with grad students
1:15 p.m.-2:30 p.m. Tour
2:30 p.m.-3:15 p.m. Microboone (Willis)
3:15 p.m.-4 p.m. ATLAS/D0 (Parsons)
4 p.m.-4:15 p.m. Break
4:15 p.m.-5 p.m. ATLAS/D0 (Brooijmans)
5 p.m.-5:45 p.m. Budget Discussion
5:45 p.m.-6:45 p.m. Executive session (closed)

Friday-Dec. 3

8:30 a.m.-9:15 a.m. Executive session (closed)
9:15 a.m.-10 a.m. ATLAS (Hughes)
10 a.m.-10:15 a.m. Break
10:15 a.m.-11 a.m. ATLAS (Tuts)
11 a.m.-11:30 a.m. Outreach (Parsons)
11:30 a.m.-12:15 p.m. Panel-PI discussions
12:15 p.m.-1:15 p.m. Lunch with postdocs
1:15 p.m.-2:30 p.m. Executive session (closed)
    Reason for Closing: The proposal contains proprietary or 
confidential material including technical information; financial 
data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning 
individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt 
under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine 
Act.

    Dated: November 16, 2010.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-29214 Filed 11-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 4:03-CR-20-SPM

MICHAEL WALLACE,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

ORDER REDUCING SENTENCE PURSUANT TO RULE 35

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the “Motion Concerning

Substantial Assistance” (doc. 65) filed by the Government on August 25, 2006,

which advises that, after sentencing, Defendant provided assistance in the

investigation of a 1992 homicide in Boynton Beach and testified at the trial of his

co-defendant, Richard Hall. The Government notes that Defendant was the

“least credible of the eight cooperating defendants called as witnesses in the

trial” and is of the opinion that Defendant fabricated his alleged drug problem in

order to qualify for certain prison programs and incentive good time. See doc. 65

at 2.

Overall, the Government rates Defendant’s assistance as marginal at

best. Based upon this assessment, the Court finds that a limited reduction in

Defendant’s sentence is appropriate. Accordingly, it is

Case 4:03-cr-00020-SPM-AK Document 68 Filed 01/18/07 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. Defendant’s sentence of confinement is reduced in Count I from

120 months to 90 months imprisonment.

2. No reduction in the term of supervised release is awarded.

3. In all other respects, the original sentence imposed in the Judgment

and Commitment Order filed April 7, 2006 (doc. 56) shall remain

unchanged.

DONE AND ORDERED this eighteenth day of January, 2007.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 4:03-cr-00020-SPM-AK Document 68 Filed 01/18/07 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

CEDRIC CAMPBELL,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:19cv3555/LAC/EMT

WALTON COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, et al.,

Defendants.

__________________________/

ORDER

The Chief Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation on

December 13, 2019 (ECF No. 5). Efforts have been made to furnish Plaintiff a copy 

of the Report and Recommendation and to afford him an opportunity to file 

objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The copy of 

the Report and Recommendation mailed to Plaintiff at his address or record was 

returned to the court as undeliverable, with a notation that it could not be forwarded. 

No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined it 

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The Chief Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 

5) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:19cv3555/LAC/EMT

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to 

comply with an order of the court and failure to keep the court apprised of his current 

address.

3. The clerk of court is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 14th day of January 2020.

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

s/L.A. Collier
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification of CFO Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of KapStone Paper andPackaging Corporation for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Andrea K.Tarbox, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of KapStone Paper andPackaging Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation.

 

Dated:August 4, 2010

 
|   | By:                                         | /s/  Andrea K. Tarbox |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|-----------------------|
|   | Andrea  K. Tarbox                           |
|   | Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----
§ 2903.19 Use of funds; changes. ( a ) *Delegation of fiscal responsibility.* Unless the terms and conditions of the award state otherwise, the awardee may not in whole or in part delegate or transfer to another person, institution, or organization the responsibility for use or expenditure of award funds.
( b ) *Changes in project plans.* ( 1 ) The permissible changes by the awardee, PD(s), or other key project personnel in the approved project shall be limited to changes in methodology, techniques, or other similar aspects of the project to expedite achievement of the project's approved goals. If the awardee or the PD(s) is uncertain as to whether a change complies with this provision, the question must be referred to the Authorized Departmental Officer (ADO) for a final determination. The ADO is the signatory of the award document, not the program contact.
( 2 ) Changes in approved goals or objectives shall be requested by the awardee and approved in writing by the ADO prior to effecting such changes. In no event shall requests for such changes be approved which are outside the scope of the original approved project.
( 3 ) Changes in approved project leadership or the replacement or reassignment of other key project personnel shall be requested by the awardee and approved in writing by the ADO prior to effecting such changes.
( 4 ) Transfers of actual performance of the substantive programmatic work in whole or in part and provisions for payment of funds, whether or not Federal funds are involved, shall be requested by the awardee and approved in writing by the ADO prior to effecting such transfers, unless prescribed otherwise in the terms and conditions of the award.
( 5 ) *Changes in project period.* The project period may be extended by OEPNU without additional financial support, for such additional period(s) as the ADO determines may be necessary to complete or fulfill the purposes of an approved project, but in no case shall the total project period exceed five years. Any extension of time shall be conditioned upon prior request by the awardee and approval in writing by the ADO, unless prescribed otherwise in the terms and conditions of award.
( 6 ) *Changes in approved budget.* Changes in an approved budget must be requested by the awardee and approved in writing by the ADO prior to instituting such changes if the revision will involve transfers or expenditures of amounts requiring prior approval as set forth in the applicable Federal cost principles, Departmental regulations, or award.
#### § 29.107 Order of providing service.

When tobacco is to be inspected, sampled, or weighed upon request, such services shall be rendered as far as practicable in the order in which applications were received. In conducting mandatory inspection, the inspection shall start at the beginning of the “break” in the auction warehouse where the sale is scheduled to start and the inspection shall continue in the order of sale on each warehouse floor and from warehouse to warehouse.
[ J - 34 - 2024 ] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

IN RE: NOMINATION PETITION OF WILLIAM ANDERSON AS DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATE FOR THE 24TH LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT OBJECTION OF: L'OREAL SNELL, AMANDA GREEN

HAWKINS AND ERIN WISE

APPEAL OF: WILLIAM ANDERSON : : : : : : : : : No. 9 WAP 2 024 Appeal from Th e O rder o f the Commonwealth Court entered March 4, 2024 at No

. 95 MD 2024. S UBMITTED: Ma rch 19 , 2024

O RDER

PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 22 nd day of March , 2024 , the order of the Commonwealth Court is AFFIRMED

. Chief Justice Todd and Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
#### § 29.6053 Wet (high-case).

Any sound tobacco containing excessive moisture to the extent that it is in unsafe or doubtful-keeping order. Wet applies to any tobacco which is not damaged but which is likely to damage if treated in the customary manner. (See Rule 17.)
Case 7:20-cv-02945-MCR-HTC Document 20-22 Filed 08/09/22 Page 1 of 3
From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

You good with the attached? 

Regards, 

Norb 

Norbert J. Biderman 

Tuesday, August 28, 2012 2:32 PM 

Doug H. Moses 

Fw: Revised Proof 

3M_180003506.pdf 

Norbert J. Biderman 1 Director 

3M Defense 

3M Center, Building 225-45-25 1 St. Paul, MN 55144 

Office: 651 736 9733 1 Mobile: 651 216 9105 1 Fax: 651 732 8145 

njbiderman@mmm.com 1 www.3M.com/Defense 

-----Forwarded by Norbert J. Biderman/US-Corporate/3M/US on 08/28/2012 09:31AM-----

From: "Mike Calabrese" 

To: , 

Date: 08/28/2012 09:21 AM 

Subject: Revised Proof 

Please review the attached, revised proof for the West Point and Army vs. Navy Football Programs and reply with 

approval/changes. Thanks! 

Mike Calabrese 

Professional Sports Publications 

570 Elmont Road 

Elmont, NY 11 003 

(646)660-8903 

mcalabrese@pspsports.com(See attached file: 3M _1800035 06.pdj) 

Confidential - Subject to Protective Order 3M MDL000281765 

P0944.1

PLAINTIFFS'

TRIAL EXHIBIT

P-GEN-02001

P-GEN-02001.1 Case 7:20-cv-02945-MCR-HTC Document 20-22 Filed 08/09/22 Page 2 of 3
• 

1e Losing your hearing is not a requirement for serving your ear 

country. With proper fitting, training and the right hearing 

protector, you can maintain your survivability, lethality and 

mission effectiveness ... and enjoy the quiet sounds of life. 

3MTM Combat ArmsTM and 3MTM E-A-RTM Skull Screws'M Earplugs 

are designed to help meet the demanding hearing protection 

needs of the armed forces. 

later. 

Assembled and distribute<! by New Dynamics COrp. 

Ordering info: 1-800-925-3421 www.newdynamlcs.net 

New()rnlmlcl O!ltp.lsa ~ol NIW DyftlmlcsCorpcnocn 

3M'" E-A-R'" Skull Screws E-A-R'" Combat Arms'" Earplugs 

0 3M 2012-M r9Q reserved. 3M, E·A·R. CombG1 AnniWid 9dl Scnw1110 ntcmancs of 3M~. 1o1StG ""*" lc'.Qle in CINdiL U.S. PI~ 7,$,786; 6.068.079; 6.070,693Wid 6,141,821 

SfrretalknlgahawtblaiUiedc:a.t'i~Syetl'h~oiDtlense.. 

Confidential - Subject to Protective Order 

3NI www.3M.com/Defense 

3M MDL000281766 

P0944.2

P-GEN-02001.2 Case 7:20-cv-02945-MCR-HTC Document 20-22 Filed 08/09/22 Page 3 of 3
# CI2021015EN.01000201.xml

| 14.1.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CI 15/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CI 15/2

---

Corrigendum to Joint Conclusions of the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission on Policy Objectives and Priorities for 2020-2024

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 451I of 29 December 2020
  )

(2021/C 15 I/02)

Publication (2021/C 451 I/02) on page 4 is to be considered null and void.

---
§ 3201.126 Durable tableware. ( a ) *Definition.* Durable tableware consists of multiple-use drinkware and dishware including cups, plates, bowls, and serving platters.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The Federal preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 28 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than July 6, 2020, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased durable tableware. By that date, Federal agencies responsible for drafting or reviewing specifications for products to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased durable tableware.
[84 FR 32021, July 5, 2019]