alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Searched for **http://www.ssa.gov/pubs/10107.html**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.ssa.gov/pubs/10107.html**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 3:19cr113/MCR

TERRELL BURDETTE

 /

ACCEPTANCE OF PLEA OF GUILTY

Pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate 

Judge, to which there have been no timely objections, and subject to this Court=s 

consideration of the Plea Agreement pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 11, the plea of 

guilty of the Defendant, TERRELL BURDETTE, to Counts I, II, III, IV and VI of 

the Indictment is hereby ACCEPTED. All parties shall appear before this Court 

for sentencing as directed.

DONE and ORDERED this 1st day of June 2020.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:19-cr-00113-MCR Document 149 Filed 06/01/20 Page 1 of 1
§ 301.89-9 Assembly and inspection of regulated articles. ( a ) Persons requiring certification or other services must request the services of an inspector[1] at least 24 hours before the services are needed.
( b ) The regulated articles must be assembled at the place and in the manner the inspector designates as necessary to comply with this subpart.
[61 FR 52207, Oct. 4, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 23628, May 1, 1997; 64 FR 29550, June 2, 1999; 75 FR 68945, Nov. 10, 2010; 87 FR 80017, Dec. 29, 2022] Footnotes -
301.89-9
[1] See footnote 1 in § 301.89-6.
Page 1 of 2

Case No: 4:08cv324

- RH/WCS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

FLORIDA WILDLIFE

FEDERATION, INC., et al.,

Plaintiffs,

CONSOLIDATED CASE

v. CASE NO. 4:08cv324

- RH/WCS

LISA P. JACKSON, etc., et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

ORDER EXTENDING THE DEADLINES

FOR PROPOSED AND FINAL RULES FOR

COASTAL AND ESTUARINE WATERS

The consented motion, ECF No. 357, to further extend specific deadline s

established under the consent decree entered December 30, 2009, ECF No. 153 , is

GRANTED . The deadline for the Administrator of the Environmental Protection

Agency to sign for publication a proposed regulation setting out numeric water

Case 4:08-cv-00324-RH-WCS Document 359 Filed 03/02/12 Page 1 of 2Page 2 of 2

Case No: 4:08cv324

- RH/WCS quality criteria for coastal and estuarine waters and Sou th Florida flowing waters is

extended to May 21, 2012. The deadline for the Administrator to sign for

publication a notice of final rulemaking for these waters is extended to January 7,

2013.

SO ORDERED on March 2 , 2012.

s/Robert L. Hinkle

United States District Judge Case 4:08-cv-00324-RH-WCS Document 359 Filed 03/02/12 Page 2 of 2
#### § 29.12 Terms defined.

As used in this subpart and in all instructions, forms, and documents in connection therewith, the words and phrases hereinafter defined shall have the indicated meanings so assigned unless the context or subject matter otherwise requires.
§ 3201.46 Forming lubricants. ( a ) *Definition.* Products designed to provide lubrication during metalworking applications that are performed under extreme pressure. Such metalworking applications include tube bending, stretch forming, press braking, and swaging.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 68 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than October 27, 2010, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased forming lubricants. By that date, Federal agencies that have the responsibility for drafting or reviewing specifications for items to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased forming lubricants.
[74 FR 55093, Oct. 27, 2009]
EXHIBIT 23.a.


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


     We  hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in  the
Registration  Statements Nos. 333-76616, 333-65013  and  333-6103
each on  Form  S-8 and to Registration Statement No. 333-45218 on
Form  S-3, and in  the  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-KSB of Igene
Biotechnology,  Inc. for the years ended December  31,  2006  and
2005  of  our   report  dated  March 8, 2007, relating   to   the
consolidated   financial   statements  of   Igene  Biotechnology,
Inc.

                                   /s/ BERENSON LLP
                                   ___________________________
                                       BERENSON LLP

New York, New York
March 29, 2007
EXHIBIT 32.1
  CERTIFICATION
    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
    PURSUANT
 TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  Form 10-K
  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of
    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
    1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and results of
    operations of the Company.  Dated January 27, 2009

/s/  JEFFREY
    T. MEZGERJeffrey
    T. Mezger
    President and Chief Executive Officer
    (Principal Executive Officer)
```

[108th Congress Public Law 356]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ356.108]

[[Page 118 STAT. 1416]]

Public Law 108-356
108th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To extend certain authority of the Supreme Court Police, modify the 
    venue of prosecutions relating to the Supreme Court building and 
  grounds, and authorize the acceptance of gifts to the United States 
          Supreme Court. <<NOTE: Oct. 21, 2004 -  [S. 2742]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR THE UNITED STATES SUPREME 
                              COURT POLICE TO PROTECT COURT 
                              OFFICIALS OFF THE SUPREME COURT 
                              GROUNDS.

    Section 6121(b)(2) of title 40, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``2004'' and inserting ``2008''.
SEC. 2. VENUE FOR PROSECUTIONS RELATING TO THE UNITED STATES 
                    SUPREME COURT BUILDING AND GROUNDS.

    Section 6137 of title 40, United States Code, is amended by striking 
subsection (b) and inserting the following:
    ``(b) Venue and Procedure.--Prosecution for a violation described in 
subsection (a) shall be in the United States District Court for the 
District of Columbia or in the Superior Court of the District of 
Columbia, on information by the United States Attorney or an Assistant 
United States Attorney.''.
SEC. 3. GIFTS TO THE UNITED STATES SUPREME <<NOTE: 28 USC 1 
                    note.>> COURT.

    The Chief Justice or his designee is authorized to accept, hold, 
administer, and utilize gifts and bequests of personal property 
pertaining to the history of the United States Supreme Court or

[[Page 118 STAT. 1417]]

its justices, but gifts or bequests of money shall be covered into the 
Treasury.

    Approved October 21, 2004.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 2742:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):
            Sept. 28, considered and passed Senate.
            Oct. 6, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

MATTHEW JAMES MCKINNEY,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 3:20cv5400-LC/MAF

MARK INCH,

Respondent.

 /

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation

of the U.S. Magistrate Judge dated November 18, 2020 (ECF No. 11), that

Respondent’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 10) be granted and the petition

for writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 1), filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254,

be dismissed as untimely. The parties have been furnished a copy of the

Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file

objections pursuant 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. 

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have

determined it should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 11) is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order. 

Case 3:20-cv-05400-LC-MAF Document 12 Filed 12/17/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

2. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “Respondent’s motion to

dismiss (ECF No. 10) is GRANTED and the petition for writ of habeas

corpus (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED. Any certificate of appealability is

DENIED and leave to appeal in forma pauperis is also DENIED.” 

3. The Clerk shall close the file. 

DONE AND ORDERED on this 17th day of December, 2020.

 s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No. 3:20cv5400-LC/MAF

Case 3:20-cv-05400-LC-MAF Document 12 Filed 12/17/20 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JOHN HENRY FREDERICK,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:20cv204–WS/MAF

WAKULLA CORRECTIONAL

INSTITUTION ADMINISTRATION

AND STAFF WORKERS, et al.,

Defendants.

 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF

No. 4) docketed April 28, 2020. The magistrate judge recommends that the

plaintiff's complaint and this case be dismissed under the three strikes provision of

28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The plaintiff has filed no objections to the magistrate judge’s

report and recommendation. 

Having reviewed the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, this

court has determined that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation should

Case 4:20-cv-00204-WS-MAF Document 5 Filed 06/03/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

be adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF No. 4) is hereby

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order.

2. Plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 2) for appointment of counsel is DENIED.

3. The plaintiff’s complaint and this action are DISMISSED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

4. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: “This action is dismissed without

prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).”

5. The Clerk of Court shall note on the docket that this case was dismissed

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

DONE AND ORDERED this 3rd day of June , 2020.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:20-cv-00204-WS-MAF Document 5 Filed 06/03/20 Page 2 of 2
#### § 29.2409 Rule 18.

Any lot of tobacco containing 20 percent or more of green leaves or any lot which is not crude but contains 20 percent or more of green and crude combined shall be designated by the color symbols “G”, “GL”, or “GD”.

[45 FR 47115, July 14, 1980]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

TAREYAN COOKS,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.: 4:02cv423-SPM/AK

G. R. BRANNEN, et. al.,

Defendants.

_________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

THIS CAUSE comes for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report

and Recommendation dated September 5, 2007 (doc. 143). Plaintiff has been

furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section

636(b)(1). To date, no objections have been filed. 

Having considered the report and recommendation, this Court finds that

report and recommendation should be adopted. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 143) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (doc. 81) is granted.

Case 4:02-cv-00423-SPM-AK Document 144 Filed 09/25/07 Page 1 of 2
3. The clerk shall enter judgment in favor of Defendant. 

DONE AND ORDERED this twenty-fifth day of September, 2007.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 4:02-cv-00423-SPM-AK Document 144 Filed 09/25/07 Page 2 of 2
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 6, 2015

No. 04-15-00040-CV

TEMPLETON MORTGAGE CORPORATION,

Appellant

v.

Michael MIDDLETON,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10-422

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, the appeal is 

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. Costs of appeal are taxed against Appellant 

Templeton Mortgage Corporation. 

It is so ORDERED on May 6, 2015.

_____________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 6th day of May, 2015.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
Office of Thrift Supervision Page 1 of 1

Attached are sample copies of Certificates of Corporate Existence for

federal and state savings associations. 

Procedure

1. Law firms or institutions requiring a Certificate of Corporate

Existence must submit a letter to

the following address:

Office of Thrift Supervision

Corporate Secretary

Corporate Activities Division

1700 G Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20552 

2. The letter must state the name,

city and state of the institution

for which the certificate is being

requested.

3. A $50.00 fee is required for all

documents bearing the agency

gold seal. Checks and money orders are to be made payable to

the Office of Thrift Supervision.

If the request is not accompanied by the fee, it will not be

processed. 

Summary: This Bulletin is published to inform the public of the change in title and format of the “Certificate of

Good Standing,” to the “Certificate of Corporate Existence,” and to provide guidance for requesting this document from the Office of Thrift Supervision.

Regulatory Bulletin

For Further Information Contact: Office

of Thrift Supervision, Corporate Activities Division, Washington, D.C.

Regulatory Bulletin 28

The Office of Thrift Supervision

(“OTS”) has revised its “Certificate

of Good Standing” for savings associations and has renamed it a “Certificate of Corporate Existence.” The

revised certificate serves the same

function as “good standing” certifications issued by the states for

corporations chartered in their respective jurisdictions, and certifications of corporate existence

issued by the Comptroller of the

Currency for national banks. The revised version certifies the current

corporate existence of a savings association and thus continues to provide the public with the necessary

information required for the consummation of securities offerings

and other corporate transactions.

Use of the new certificate will commence 30 days from the date of this

bulletin. 

November 9, 1992

Section: 1000

RB 28

4. Because of the volume of requests received, the OTS is unable to prepare certificates

within short deadlines. Requesters must submit their request at

least 5 working days before the

certificate is required. 

5. The Corporate Activities Division does not accept telephone

requests for certificates, nor will

the agency provide verbal certification of an institution’s existence. The certification process

involves a search of files maintained by OTS, and particular

attention must be given to each

request. 

6. All requests for return by express mail must include a prepaid, addressed express mail

envelope.

Attachments 

Office of Thrift Supervision

Handbook: Application Processing

Subject: Corporate Existence

Issuance of Certificates of Corporate Existence

—Jonathan L. Fiechter

 Deputy Director

for
Exhibit 21.1
                                                                    ------------



List of Subsidiaries of Blue Dolphin Energy Company:


o        Blue Dolphin Exploration Company, a Delaware corporation;

o        American Resources  Offshore,  Inc., a wholly-owned  subsidiary of Blue
         Dolphin Exploration, a Delaware corporation;

o        Blue Dolphin Pipe Line Company, a Delaware corporation;

o        Blue Dolphin Services Co., a Texas corporation;

o        Blue Dolphin Petroleum Company, a Delaware corporation;

o        New Avoca Gas Storage,  LLC, a Texas limited liability company in which
         the Company owns a 25% interest;

o        Petroport, Inc., a Delaware corporation; and

o        Drillmar,  Inc.,  a Delaware  corporation  in which the Company  owns a
         12.8% interest.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

BRYAN RICHARD LOVE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 71 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 26th day of July, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal, the

Motion to Compel Audio and Transcripts, and the Petition to Remove Detainer or to Set

Bail on Detainer are DENIED

.
<PAGE>
                                                            Exhibit 10.17.4




                              April 30, 1996
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
O'Brien (Newark) Cogeneration, Inc.
O'Brien (Parlin) Cogeneration, Inc.
1221 Nicollet Mall
Minneapolis, Minnesota  55403


Re:            Amended and Restated Agreement for Purchase and Sale of
               Electric Power (the "Parlin PPA") between O'Brien (Parlin)
               Cogeneration, Inc. ("Parlin") and Jersey Central Power &
               Light Company ("JCP&L") and the Third Amendment to Power
               Purchase Agreement ("Newark Third Amendment") between
               O'Brien (Newark) Cogeneration, Inc. ("Newark") and JCP&L.
               


Gentlemen:

      Please  refer  to  the above-referenced Parlin PPA and  Newark  Third
Amendment  and  to  the Order of Approval dated April 29,  1996  in  docket
numbers  EM6604396  and EM66121345, of the State of  New  Jersey  Board  of
Public Utilities (the "BPU Approval"), a copy of which is attached hereto.

     This letter is to confirm our mutual understanding and agreement that,
the BPU Approval having been received, executed signature pages to the
Third Amendment and the Parlin PPA having been exchanged, the bankruptcy
court order approving the NRG Plan (as defined in the Parlin PPA and the
Newark Third Amendment) having been entered on February 23, 1996 and the
gas supply agreement between JCP&L and Public Service Electric and Gas
Company having been entered into and approved by the New Jersey Board of
Public Utilities, all conditions precedent to the Newark Third Amendment
and the Parlin PPA have been satisfied and the Parlin PPA and the Newark
Third Amendment have become effective as of April 30, 1996.
     
<PAGE>
     
O'Brien (Newark) Cogeneration, Inc.
O'Brien (Parlin) Cogeneration, Inc.
April 30, 1996
Page 2

     If the foregoing accurately sets forth our agreement, please so
indicate by executing this letter in the space provided below and sending
it to us by facsimile transmitter.


Jersey Central Power & Light Company

By: /s/ M. P. Morrell
Name:   Michael P. Morrell
Title:  Vice President



Agreed:

O'Brien (Newark) Cogeneration, Inc.

By: /s/ Leonard Bluhm
        Leonard A. Bluhm
        President

O'Brien (Parlin) Cogeneration, Inc.

By: /s/ Leonard Bluhm
        Leonard A. Bluhm
        President
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: 7/31/2015 TO: C lean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket I d: OAR

–2013 - 0602 FROM: Mi ke Gordon , EPA Region 3 SUBJECT: 6 / 25 /15 Southeastern Electric Exchange Conference **SUMMARY** On June 25 , 2015 EPA presented at the annual Southeastern Electrical Exchange conference in Hershey , PA to discuss the proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants . The C lean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014. **ATTENDEES** Mike Gordon, EPA Region 3 Donna Mastro, EPA Region 3
###### Editorial Note on Part 1944

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1944 appear at 80 FR 9885, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### §§ 1944.691-1944.699 [Reserved]
Exhibit
      99.7




**CONSENT
          OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS**
 
 
 We
          consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
          Statements:
 
 ·
              Registration
                  Statement No. 333-126045 on Form S-8; ·
              Registration
                  Statement No. 333-100973 on Form S-8 
 and
          to
          the use of our reports dated February 12, 2007 relating to the consolidated
          financial statements of Petro-Canada and
          management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial
          reporting (which report on the consolidated financial statements expressed
          an unqualified opinion and includes a separate report titled Comments by
          Independent Registered Chartered Accountants on Canada - United States
          of
          America Reporting Difference referring to changes in accounting principles
          that
          have a material effect on the comparability of the financial statements), appearing
          in Annual Report on Form 40-F of Petro-Canada for the year ended December
          31,
          2006.
 
 dtsignature
 
 Independent
          Registered Chartered Accountants
 Calgary,
          Canada
 February
          12, 2007
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-51,218-09

IN RE LARRY F LORES , Relator

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF M ANDAM US CAUSE NO. 756276 IN THE 177th DISTRICT COURT

F ROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ o f m an damus pursuant to the orig inal jurisdiction of this Court. I n it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habea s corpus in the 177th District Court of Har ri s County in Dec ember of 2015, that more than 35 day s have elapse d, and that the a

pplication has not y et bee n forwa rded to this Court. I n these circ umstances, additional fac ts are neede d. Respondent, the District Clerk of Har ris County , is order ed to f

ile a response , which may be made by submitt ing the rec ord on such habea s corpus application, submitt ing a copy of a timely filed order which desig nates issues to be investiga ted ( see McCree v. Hampton , 824 S.W .2d 578, 579 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)), or stating that2

Relator has not filed an appl i ca t i o n for a writ of habea s corpus in Har ris County during the time period alleg ed. Should the response include an order desig nating issues, proof of the date the district attorney ’s office was serve d with the habea s application shall also be submitt ed with the response . This application for leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abey ance until Respondent has submitt ed the appropr iate response . Such response shall be submitt ed within 30 day s of the date of this order.

Filed: Aug ust 3, 2016 Do not publish