alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit32.1**

Certification ofPrincipal Executive OfficerPursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the “Report”) of Federal ServicesAcquisition Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Joel R. Jacks, Chairman and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Registrant.
| Date: October 24, 2006 |       | By:        |   | /s/ Joel R.  Jacks                        |
|------------------------|------------|------------|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|                   | ** ** | ** ** |   | **Joel R.  Jacks**                        |
|                   | ** ** | ** ** |   | **Chairman  and Chief Executive Officer** |
|                   | ** ** | ** ** |   | **(Principal  Executive Officer)**        |

 

----
**Exhibit32.1**

Certification ofPrincipal Executive OfficerPursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended  June 30, 2007 (the“Report”) of ATS Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Edward H. Bersoff, Chairman andChief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Registrant.
| Date: August 8, 2007 |       | By:        |       | /s/ Edward H.  Bersoff                    |
|----------------------|------------|------------|------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                 | ** ** | ** ** | ** ** | **Edward  H. Bersoff**                    |
|                 | ** ** | ** ** | ** ** | **Chairman  and Chief Executive Officer** |
|                 | ** ** | ** ** | ** ** | **(Principal  Executive Officer)**        |

 

 

----
Filed 10/21/2020 by Clerk of Supreme Court



### IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOT A

2020 ND 219

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v. Ginny Rose Lubitz, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20200118

Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable John C

. Irby , Judge.

AFFIRMED

.
Per Curiam

. Tracy E. Hines, Assistant State’s Attorney, Fargo, N

. D
., for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.

Russell J. Myhr e, Enderlin, N

. D
., for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.1 State v. Lubitz

No. 20200118

Per Curiam

. [¶1] Ginny Rose Lubitz appeals after a criminal judgment was entered on a jury verdict finding her guilty of murder. Lubitz argues that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the guilty verdict and that the dis trict court erred in denying her request for a continuance because the State failed to turn over discovery in a timely manner. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4).

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Jerod E. Tufte
Lisa Fair McEvers Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers
#### In the Matter of Durrell G., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[814 NYS2d 525]

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Sidney Gribetz, J.), entered on or about December 21, 2004, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of assault in the second degree, and placed him on probation until March 30, 2006, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Even if we were to find error in the court’s determination not to extend the time for service of an alibi notice, or in its curtailment of the redirect examination of appellant’s witness, we would find either or both of these errors to be harmless in view of the overwhelming evidence of appellant’s guilt *(see People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230 [1975]. Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Marlow and Malone, *JJ.*
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

STATE OF WASHINGTON,

Respondent,

v.

TAD JARED VANKIRK,

Appellant.

No. 68347-1-1

DIVISION ONE

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

FILED: DEC 8 - 2014

PER CURIAM — This case was stayed pending the Washington State

Supreme Court's decision in State v. Medina. 180 Wn.2d 282, 324 P.3d 682

(2014). The decision in Medina rejects and controls Vankirk's arguments

regarding credit for pretrial participation in the CCAP-enhanced program

(Community Center for Alternative Programs). Accordingly, we lift the stay and

affirm.

Affirmed.

FOR THE COURT:

]V>Vkc>/ JQ

M

tmh.

C3

V\

i

CO

rsj
# STATEOFLOUISIANA

COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT

ROBERT NEILLAGUILUZ
VERSUS
SUSAN CRUMHOLT AGUILUZ NO. 2023 CW 0704



### SEPTEMBER 25, 2023

In Re: Robert Neill Aguiluz,

Family Court in and Rouge, No. 221919. applying for supervisory writs, for the Parish of East Baton

BEFORE: GUIDRY, C.J., CHUTZAND LANIER, JJ.

WRIT GRANTED IN PART WITH ORDER AND DENIED IN PART. The portion of the trial court's April 10, 2023 judgment which denied the " Motion for Ex Parte Order Requiring the Preparation And Submission of a Final Judgment" filed by the plaintiff, Robert Neill Aguiluz (" Robert"), is reversed. Ajudgment that determines the merits in whole or in part is a final judgment, La. Code Civ. P. art. 1841, and a final judgment is appealable in all causes in which appeals are given by law. La. Code Civ. P. art. 2083(A). A valid judgment must be " precise, definite, and certain." See Laird

v. St. Tammany Parish Safe Harbor, 2002-0045 ( La. App. 1st Cir. 12/20/02), 836 So.2d 364, 365. Moreover, a final appealable judgment must contain decretal language. Advanced Leveling & Concrete Solutions v. Lathan Co., Inc., 2017-1250 ( La. App. 1st Cir. 12/20/18), 268 So.3d 1044, 1046. In this regard, a final judgment in accordance with Article 1841 shall be identified as such byappropriate language; shall be signed and dated; and shall, in its decree, identify the name of the party in whose favor the relief is awarded, the name ofthe partyagainstwhom the relief is awarded, and the relief that is awarded. La. Code Civ. P. art. 1918(A). Although the parties do not dispute that all issues have been resolved, the trial court's March 30, 2022 judgment, which ordered Robert and defendant, Susan Crumholt Aguiluz (" Susan"), to divide the LASERS and deferred compensation accounts by domestic relations order and further ordered Susan to prepare said domestic relations order among other relief, is not a valid final and appealable judgment. See Ennis v. McManus, 2019-0167 ( La. App. 1st Cir. 9/27/19), 2019 WL 4729645, * 2 ( unpublished) ( citing La. R.S. 9:2801 (B)); see also Advanced Leveling & Concrete Solutions, 268 So.3d at 1046 ( the specific nature and amount of damages should be determinable from a judgment so that a third person is able to determine from a judgment the amount owed without reference to other documents) . Accordingly, the " Motion for Ex Parte Order Requiring the Preparation And Submission of a Final Judgment" is granted. This matter is remanded to the trial court with instructions to sign a final judgment that is precise, definite, and certain and contains proper decretal language. In all other respects, thewrit is denied asmoot.

COURT OFAPPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT 

# IA.s.J)
DEPUTY CLERKOF COURT FORTHE COURT JMG WRC WIL
§ 301.52-7 Attachment and disposition of certificates or permits. ( a ) If a certificate or permit is required for the interstate movement of regulated articles, the certificate or permit shall be securely attached to the outside of the container in which such articles are moved, except that, where the certificate or permit is attached to the waybill or other shipping document, and the regulated articles are adequately described on the certificate, permit, or shipping document, the attachment of the certificate or permit to each container of the articles is not required.
( b ) In all cases, certificates or permits shall be furnished by the carrier to the consignee at the destination of the shipment.
```

[Federal Register: February 1, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 20)]
[Notices]               
[Page 5059]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr01fe10-33]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

 
Sunshine Act Meetings

Agency Holding the Meeting: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Time and Date: 2 p.m., Monday February 8, 2010.

Place: 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

Status: Closed.

Matters to be Considered: Rule Enforcement Review Meeting.

Contact Person for More Information: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-2189 Filed 1-28-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

WENDY KERNECHEL,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and 

OFFICER JIMMY HIGHSMITH,

Defendants.

Case No. 4:20-cv-00078-WS-MJF

UNITED STATES’ NOTICE REGARDING SERVICE

Pursuant to this Court’s September 6, 2022, Order [Doc. 45] (the “Order”), 

the undersigned certifies to the Court that Defendant Jimmy Highsmith was 

provided with a copy of Plaintiff’s Stipulation for Dismissal [Doc. 44] and the 

Order [Doc. 45] on September 7, 2022, by Unit Manager Wesley C. Fannin at 

Federal Correctional Institute – Loretto, Loretto, Pennsylvania.

Case 4:20-cv-00078-WS-MJF Document 46 Filed 09/12/22 Page 1 of 2
2

Respectfully submitted,

SEAN P. COSTELLO

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

 By:/s/ Keith A. Jones 

Keith A. Jones

Special Attorney to the United States 

Attorney General

Assistant United States Attorney

Southern District of Alabama

63 South Royal Street, Suite 600

Mobile, Alabama 36602

Telephone: 251-441-5845

Email: keith.jones2@usdoj.gov 

Attorney for United States of America 

Acting Under Authority Conferred 

by 28 U.S.C. § 515

By: /s/ Justin D. Kopf

Justin D. Kopf

Special Attorney to the United States 

 Attorney General

Assistant United States Attorney

Southern District of Alabama

63 South Royal Street, Suite 600

Mobile, Alabama 36602

Telephone: 251-441-5845

Email: justin.kopf@usdoj.gov 

Attorney for United States of America 

Acting Under Authority Conferred 

by 28 U.S.C. § 515

Case 4:20-cv-00078-WS-MJF Document 46 Filed 09/12/22 Page 2 of 2
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2258 

To amend the indemnification responsibilities applicable to the Secretary 

of Defense when Department of Defense property at military installations 

closed pursuant to a base closure law is conveyed to expand such indemnification responsibilities to include all military installations closed since 

October 24, 1988. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 5, 2013 

Mr. YOUNG of Indiana (for himself, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. YODER, Mr. POCAN, 

and Mr. SMITH of Nebraska) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend the indemnification responsibilities applicable to 

the Secretary of Defense when Department of Defense 

property at military installations closed pursuant to a 

base closure law is conveyed to expand such indemnification responsibilities to include all military installations 

closed since October 24, 1988. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Base Redevelopment 

5 and Indemnification Correction Act’’. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2258 IH

1 SEC. 2. INDEMNIFICATION OF TRANSFEREES OF PROPERTY 

2 AT ANY CLOSED MILITARY INSTALLATION. 

3 Section 330 of the National Defense Authorization 

4 Act for Fiscal Year 1993 (Public Law 102–484; 10 U.S.C. 

5 2687 note) is amended— 

6 (1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ‘‘pursuant 

7 to a base closure law’’ and inserting ‘‘after October 

8 24, 1988, the date of the enactment of the Defense 

9 Authorization Amendments and Base Closure and 

10 Realignment Act (Public Law 100–526; 10 U.S.C. 

11 2687 note)’’; and 

12 (2) in subsection (f), by striking paragraph (3). 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS  ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Robert M. Brown, Chief Financial Officer of BabyUniverse, Inc. (the “Company”) in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)     the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)     the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 14th day of November 2005. 

|   |   | */s/ Robert M. Brown*     |
|--------|--------|---------------------------|
|   |   |                           |
|   |   | *Robert M. Brown*         |
|   |   | Chief   Financial Officer |
EXHIBIT 32.1

        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with  the  IGENE Biotechnology,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A for the  period  ended
December  31,  2003,  as filed with the Securities  and  Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen F.  Hiu,
President  of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934, as amended; and

          (2)   The  information contained in the  Report  fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: August 25, 2005           By: /S/ STEPHEN F. HIU
                                    _____________________________
                                        STEPHEN F. HIU
                                        President


A  signed original of this written statement required by  Section
906  has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company  and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**     I, Shai Even, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Alon USA Energy, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.     Date: November 10, 2005         /s/  Shai Even  Shai Even   Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.2

              SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                        THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

In connection  with the annual report of North  American  Nickel Inc.  (formerly
Widescope Resources Inc.) (the "Company") on Form 20-F/A Amendment No. 1 for the
period  ending  December  31,  2011 as filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward D. Ford, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  the  Report  containing  the  financial  statements  of the  Company  fully
     complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
     the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 8, 2012

/s/ Edward D. Ford
--------------------------------------------
Edward D. Ford
Chief Financial Officer

* A signed original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```
§ 29.3542 Rework. Any lot of Types 35, 36, and 37 tobacco which needs to be resorted or otherwise reworked to prepare it properly for market in the manner which is customary in the type area, including: ( a ) Tobacco which is so mixed that it cannot be classified properly in any grade of the type, because the lot contains a substantial quantity of two or more distinctly different grades which should be separated by sorting;
( b ) Tobacco which contains an abnormally large quantity of foreign matter or an unusual number of muddy or extremely dirty leaves which should be removed; and
( c ) Tobacco not tied in hands, not packed straight, not properly tied, or otherwise not properly prepared for market. (See Rule 24, § 29.3625.)
[30 FR 9207, July 23, 1965. Redesignated and amended at 49 FR 16759, Apr. 20, 1984]
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2223 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2223

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 220 Elm Avenue in Munising, Michigan, as the ``Elizabeth L. Kinnunen 
                        Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 3, 2013

 Mr. Benishek (for himself, Mr. Conyers, Mrs. Miller of Michigan, Mr. 
Camp, Mr. Levin, Mr. Dingell, Mr. Huizenga of Michigan, Mr. Amash, Mr. 
   Walberg, and Mr. Kildee) introduced the following bill; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 220 Elm Avenue in Munising, Michigan, as the ``Elizabeth L. Kinnunen 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIZABETH L. KINNUNEN POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 220 Elm Avenue in Munising, Michigan, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Elizabeth L. Kinnunen Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Elizabeth 
L. Kinnunen Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
================================================================================

Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Shepard Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned,  in the
capacities and on the dates indicated  below,  hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
           15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.    The  information  contained  in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
           material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
           of the Company.


Date:  November 15, 2005


/s/ Glen Macdonald
-------------------------------------------
Glen Macdonald, Principal Financial Officer