alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10.12


 


SUMMARY OF
COMPENSATION OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS


 


Prior to June 1, 2004, the annual compensation of each director who was
not an employee of the Company or a subsidiary (a “Non-employee Director”)
consisted of (1) an annual retainer of $10,000, up to half of which could be
paid in unrestricted shares of Common Stock and (2) a grant of non-qualified
stock options to purchase 3,000 shares of Common Stock.  The shares of Common Stock and options for
Common Stock were issued pursuant to the Edge Petroleum Corporation Incentive
Plan.


 


Effective beginning June 1, 2004, the annual compensation for
Non-employee Directors was revised to eliminate the stock option grant
component and increase the annual retainer, all or a portion of which may be
paid in shares of Common Stock.  If the
Board elects to pay all or some of the retainer in shares of Common Stock, all
or a portion of those shares may be subject to restriction, in the discretion
of the Board.  The Edge Petroleum
Corporation Incentive Plan was amended and restated effective June 1, 2004
accordingly (as amended and restated, the “Incentive Plan”).  Under the Incentive Plan, the Board has the
discretion to reinstate the annual option grant.  In accordance with the new annual
compensation arrangement, in 2004 Non-Employee Directors were paid an annual
retainer equal to the sum of (1) $10,000 (paid in cash) and (2) the value of
2,400 shares of Common Stock (paid in kind). 
The shares vest ratably over three years beginning on the first
anniversary of the grant date.  The fair
market value of the shares on the June 1, 2004 award date was $32,640 per
director.  No option awards were made to
Non-Employee Directors in 2004.


 


In addition, each Non-employee Director is to receive a $1,000 cash
payment for in-person attendance at a meeting of the Board of Directors ($400
if such attendance is telephonic) and $750 ($1,200 in the case of a chairman of
a Committee even if such attendance is telephonic) for each meeting of a
Committee of the Board of Directors attended ($400 if telephonic).  All directors are reimbursed for out-of-pocket
expenses incurred in attending meetings of the Board or Board committees and
for other expenses incurred in their capacity as directors.


 


At its February 2005 meeting, the Corporate Governance/Nominating
Committee reviewed the director’s compensation and determined that such
compensation should be increased in light of the increased duties,
responsibilities and complexities of Board service.  The committee deferred taking any action to
increase director compensation, however, until after reviewing certain
competitive information and surveys of director compensation of the Company’s
peers and competitors.  Increases, if
any, in director compensation will be finally reviewed and approved by the
Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee at a meeting later in 2005 submitted
to the full Board for approval and reported in the proxy statement for the 2006
annual meeting.
98-1373.

#### State v. Bowman.

Hamilton App. No. C-970520. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; *sua sponte,*cause held for the decision in 97-1985, *State v. Cook,*Allen App. No. 1-97-21; briefing schedule stayed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit32**

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Stone Arcade Acquisition Corporation (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Roger Stone, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive and FinancialOfficer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, asadopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of my knowledge:

(1)           The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and result of operations of the Company for the period certified.

Pursuant to the rulesand regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, this certificationis being furnished and is not deemed filed.

Signed on this 12th dayof December, 2006.
|        | /s/ Roger Stone |   |
|--------|-----------------|--------|
|   | Roger Stone     |

 

----
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

CALVIN ROOT,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO. 1:03cv32-MMP/AK

JERRY B. MILLER,

Defendants.

 /

SECOND ORDER REQUESTING ASSISTANCE

FROM DEPUTY GENERAL COUNSEL SUSAN MAHER 

By previous Order the Court requested that Deputy General Counsel for the

Florida Department of Corrections assist an inmate in certain discovery from other

inmates. (Doc. 62). That Order dated September 9, 2005, provided a time frame of

thirty days to return the discovery responses to the Plaintiff, who has advised the Court

that no such responses have been made to him. (Doc. 63). The Court is appreciative

of any assistance the DOC can provide in this matter, especially since they are not a

party to this lawsuit. 

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED:

Case 1:03-cv-00032-AK Document 64 Filed 12/12/05 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

No. 1:03cv32-mmp/ak

The Clerk is herein directed to copy document numbers 61, 62, and 63 to attach

to this order and mail all to Susan Maher, Deputy General Counsel, 2601 Blair Stone

Road, Tallahassee, FL 32399-2500. If Ms. Maher Is unable to assist the Court in this

matter, she should respond to this Order on or before December 30, 2005.

DONE AND ORDERED at Gainesville, Florida, this 12th day of December,

2005.

s/A. Kornblum 

ALLAN KORNBLUM

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:03-cv-00032-AK Document 64 Filed 12/12/05 Page 2 of 2
§ 301.38-6 Compliance agreements and cancellation. ( a ) Any State may enter into a written compliance agreement with any person who grows or handles regulated articles in a protected area, or moves interstate regulated articles from a protected area, under which that person agrees to comply with this subpart, to provide inspectors with information concerning the source of any regulated articles acquired each year, and to prevent the unauthorized use of certificates issued for future use under the compliance agreement.[1]
( b ) A compliance agreement may be cancelled by an inspector, orally or in writing, whenever he or she determines that the person who has entered into the compliance agreement has failed to comply with the agreement or this subpart. If the cancellation is oral, the cancellation and the reasons for the cancellation will be confirmed, in writing, within 20 days of oral notification of the cancellation. Any person whose compliance agreement has been cancelled may appeal the decision, in writing, within 10 days after receiving written notification of the cancellation. The appeal must state all of the facts and reasons upon which the person relies to show that the compliance agreement was wrongfully cancelled. A hearing will be held to resolve any conflict as to any material fact. An appeal shall be granted or denied, in writing, as promptly as circumstances allow, and the reasons for the decision shall be stated. In a non-protected area, appeal shall be made to the Administrator. The Administrator shall adopt rules of practice for the hearing. The compliance agreement will remain cancelled pending decision of the appeal.
[54 FR 32791, Aug. 10, 1989; 54 FR 38494, Sept. 18, 1989, as amended at 57 FR 3118, Jan. 28, 1992; 59 FR 67608, Dec. 30, 1994; 87 FR 80005, Dec. 29, 2022] Footnotes -
301.38-6
[1] In non-protected areas, compliance agreements may be arranged by contacting a local office of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), Plant Protection and Quarantine, or by writing to the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Plant Protection and Quarantine, Domestic and Emergency Operations, 4700 River Road Unit 134, Riverdale, Maryland 20737-1236.
##### 



Exhibit 31(b)
 CERTIFICATIONS
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q (this Report) of Alpha NR Holding, Inc. (the Registrant);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this Report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;4.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the Registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being
prepared;b.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this Report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; andc.
    
    Disclosed in this Report any change in the Registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the Registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial
reporting;
 5.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role
in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 /s/ David C. StuebeDavid C. StuebeVice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)  39
State of California 

Environmental Protection Agency 

AIR RESOURCES BOARD

Notice of Decision and 

Response to Significant Environmental Issues 

Item: California Consumer Products Regulations and 

Test Method 310

Approved By: Resolution 09-51 

Adopted by: Executive Order R-10-013 

Agenda Item: 09-8-4 

Public Hearing Date: September 24, 2009 

Issuing Authority: Air Resources Board 

Comment: The Air Resources Board received a few comments 

asserting that adverse environmental impacts may result 

from this item. These comments are summarized and 

responded to in the Final Statement of Reasons for this 

regulatory item, which is incorporated by reference herein. 

Response: N/A 

Certified: ___________/s/__________

 Amy J. Whiting, Regulations Coordinator 

Date: August 6, 2010
#### § 29.3109 Rule 6.

Any lot of tobacco which meets the specifications of two grades shall be placed in the higher grade. Any lot of tobacco on the marginal line between two grades shall be placed in the lower grade.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-07-14T20:16:02-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2566 

To modify the definition of armor piercing ammunition to better capture 

its capabilities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 27, 2013 

Ms. SPEIER (for herself, Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York, Ms. 

CLARKE, Ms. BROWN of Florida, Mr. CARTWRIGHT, Mr. TIERNEY, Ms. 

SHEA-PORTER, Mr. HOLT, Mr. GRIJALVA, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. 

MORAN, Ms. BASS, Ms. FRANKEL of Florida, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. HONDA, Mr. MCGOVERN, and Mr. FARR) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To modify the definition of armor piercing ammunition to 

better capture its capabilities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ARMOR PIERCING AMMUNITION. 

4 (a) EXPANSION OF DEFINITION.—Section 

5 921(a)(17)(B) of title 18, United States Code, is amend6 ed— 

7 (1) in clause (I), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end; 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2566 IH

1 (2) in clause (ii), by striking the period and in2 serting ‘‘; and’’; and 

3 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(iii) a projectile that— 

5 ‘‘(I) may be used in a handgun; 

6 and 

7 ‘‘(II) the Attorney General deter8 mines, under section 926(d), to be ca9 pable of penetrating body armor.’’. 

10 (b) DETERMINATION OF CAPABILITY OF PROJEC11 TILES TO PENETRATE BODY ARMOR.— 

12 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 926 of such title is 

13 amended by adding at the end the following: 

14 ‘‘(d)(1) The Attorney General, in consultation with 

15 Director of Operational Test and Evaluation of the De16 partment of Defense, shall promulgate standards for the 

17 uniform testing of projectiles against the Body Armor Ex18 emplar. 

19 ‘‘(2) The standards promulgated under paragraph 

20 (1) shall take into account, among other factors, vari21 ations in performance that are related to the type of hand22 gun used, the length of the barrel of the handgun, the 

23 amount and kind of powder used to propel the projectile, 

24 and the design of the projectile. 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2566 IH

1 ‘‘(3) In paragraph (1), the term ‘Body Armor Exem2 plar’ means body armor that the Attorney General deter3 mines meets minimum standards for the protection of law 

4 enforcement officers.’’. 

5 (2) TIMING OF PROMULGATION OF STAND6 ARDS.—The Attorney General shall promulgate the 

7 standards required by section 926(d) of title 18, 

8 United States Code, within 1 year after the date of 

9 the enactment of this section. 

10 (3) ASSESSMENT AND MODIFICATION OF

11 STANDARDS.—The Attorney General shall assess the 

12 standards every 3 years, or more frequently if the 

13 Attorney General finds that technological advances 

14 warrant doing so, and shall modify the standards as 

15 appropriate. 

Æ 


PWALKER on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
##### 



Exhibit 10.61 FIRST AMENDMENT TO
SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE (this Amendment), dated as of January 26,
2005, is entered into between David A. Weil (the Lender), and NATURADE, INC., a Delaware
corporation (the Borrower). RECITALS A. The Borrower and the Lender have entered into a SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE dated as of April 13,
2003 (the Loan Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein have the meanings given to them
in the Loan Agreement unless otherwise specified. B. The Borrower has requested that the Lender amend the payment provisions of the Loan Agreement. AMENDMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants herein contained, and
for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows: 5. Amendments to Loan Agreement.  a.
    Effective January 26, 2005 payments on the Loan Agreement will be
amended as follows:  i.
    On or before December 31, 2005 Borrower will
pay principal of $50,000 plus accrued interestii.
    Cash interest of 6% will be paid quarterly with
the remaining interest is paid in full at termination of Note.iii.
    Accrued interest will be compounded on a
quarterly basis. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have entered into this Amendment as of the date first above
written.
 Naturade, Inc. /s/Stephen M. Kasprisin
Stephen M. Kasprisin
Chief Operating Officer David A. Weil /s/ David A. Weil
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,
2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert J. Krakauer, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/ Robert J. Krakauer               
|Robert J. Krakauer                   
|President and Chief Financial Officer
|November 14, 2007                    

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-30456 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOHN LACOUR, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 97-CR-10012-3

-------------------- October 25, 2001 Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * John Lacour, federal prisoner # 09668-035, appeals the district court’s denial of his postconviction motion to rescind the imposition of a $40,000 fine. Lacour challenged the fine on direct appeal, and we affirmed the district court. See United States v. Lacour , No. 98-30803 (5th Cir. Apr. 11, 2000) (unpublished). Lacour, however, again argues that imposition of a fine was a violation of his Eighth Amendment rights because of his inability to pay.No. 01-30456 -2- The district court was without jurisdiction to entertain this unauthorized motion. See United States v. Hatten , 167 F.3d 884, 886 (5th Cir. 1999) (district court has no jurisdiction to entertain a challenge to the legality of a fine imposed as a term of supervised release); see also United States v. Early, 27 F.3d 140, 141-42 (5th Cir. 1994) (district court has no jurisdiction to entertain unauthorized motions) . This appeal is without arguable merit and therefore frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). It is dismissed. 5th Cir. R. 42.2. DISMISSED.
EXHIBIT 32-1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax
Credit Fund VI, L.P., Series 14 (the "Partnership") for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Wilfred N. Cooper,
Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general
partner of the Partnership, hereby certify that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Partnership.


/s/WILFRED N. COOPER, JR.
-------------------------
Wilfred N. Cooper, Jr.
President and Chief Executive Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.

April 1, 2010
#### § 29.3543 Semicured.

Tobacco in the process of being cured or which is partially but not thoroughly cured. Semicured includes tobacco which contains fat stems, wet butts, swelled stems, frozen tobacco, and tobacco having frozen stems or stems that have not been thoroughly dried in the curing process. (See Rule 24, § 29.3625.)

[30 FR 9207, July 23, 1965. Redesignated at 49 FR 16759, Apr. 20, 1984]
Exhibit 32.1



              SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



In connection with the Annual Report of ASA International Ltd. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned,
Alfred C. Angelone, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:    October 1, 2004                             /s/ Alfred C. Angelone
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     Alfred C. Angelone
                                                     Chief Executive Officer




<PAGE>