alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2578 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2578

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend for one year 
    the hold harmless provision for small rural hospitals and sole 
 community hospitals under the Medicare prospective payment system for 
    hospital outpatient department services, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 28, 2013

Mr. Braley of Iowa introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee 
 on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend for one year 
    the hold harmless provision for small rural hospitals and sole 
 community hospitals under the Medicare prospective payment system for 
    hospital outpatient department services, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rural Hospital Fairness Act of 
2013''.

SEC. 2. ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF OUTPATIENT HOLD HARMLESS PROVISION.

    (a) In General.--Section 1833(t)(7)(D)(i) of the Social Security 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1395l(t)(7)(D)(i)), as amended by section 3002(a) of the 
Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 (Public Law 112-
96), is amended--
            (1) in subclause (II)--
                    (A) in the first sentence, by striking ``January 1, 
                2013'' and inserting ``January 1, 2014''; and
                    (B) in the second sentence, by striking ``or 2012'' 
                and inserting ``, 2012, or 2013''; and
            (2) in subclause (III)--
                    (A) in the first sentence, by striking ``January 1, 
                2013'' and inserting ``January 1, 2014''; and
                    (B) in the second sentence, by striking ``March 1, 
                2012'' and inserting ``January 1, 2014''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect as if included in the enactment of section 3002 of the 
Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 (Public Law 112-
96).
                                 <all>
```
Creating A Government thatWorks Better and Costs Less
Status ReportSeptember 1994

1994 Status Report Directory
Filed by Automated Filing Services Inc. (604) 609-0244 - Sungold International Holdings Corp. - Exhibit 4.25




LETTER OF INTENT – EXTENSION

            This
  Extension Agreement, dated July, 30, 2004 by and between TAC International Investments
  LLC (“TAC”) and Sungold International Holdings Corp. formerly Sungold
  Entertainment Corp.. (“Sungold”) sets forth the intentions of the
  parties relative to the Richmond Thoroughbred Training Centre (the “Project”).


             TAC
  and Sungold entered into a Letter of Intent, dated December 8, 1997, extended
  by Letter of Intent – Extension, dated March 3, 1998, Letter of Intent
  – Extension, dated June 12, 1998, Letter of Intent – Extension,
  dated October 14, 1998, Letter of Intent – Extension dated February 19,
  1999, Letter of Intent – Extension, dated September 27, 1999, Letter of
  Intent – Extension, dated September 29, 2000 and Letter of Intent –
  Extension, dated October, 1, 2003 (collectively hereafter referred to as the
  “Letter of Intent”) which sets out their intentions relative to
  the Project. The Letter of Intent, along with all rights and obligations of
  the parties thereto shall expire on October 1, 2005, unless extended, in writing,
  by both parties thereto.

             The
  extended Letter of Intent dated July 30, 2004 set out the intention of both
  parties that upon Sungold receiving the appropriate permissions from the Cities
  of Richmond, BC, Vancouver, B.C. and from the province of British Columbia to
  develop the Project, TAC would purchase 6 million common treasury shares of
  Sungold, at US $4.00 per share, by way of a private placement. The parties hereto
  hereby agree that upon Sungold receiving the appropriate permission from the
  City of Richmond, BC and from the province of British Columbia to develop the
  Project, TAC will purchase 6 million common treasury shares of Sungold at US
  $4.00 per share, by way of private placement.

             This
  Extension Agreement is intended to be a binding agreement and supersedes all
  other agreements by and between the parties hereto. This Extension Agreement
  along with all rights and obligations hereto shall expire on October 1, 2005,
  unless extended, in writing, by both parties hereto.

	 	SUNGOLD INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS CORP.
	 	 	 
	 	Per:	/s/ Art Cowie
	 	 	
 
	 	 	Art Cowie President and CEO
	 	 	 




	 	TAC INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENTS LLC.
	 	 	 
	 	Per:	/s/ Donald R. Harris
	 	 	
 
	 	 	Donald R. Harris, President and CEO
#### § 1786.38 Judicial review.

This subpart is intended to set forth RUS policies and procedures for the orderly administration of the provisions of section 306(A) of the RE Act, section 633 of the continuing resolution, and section 637 of the 1989 Appropriations Act and is not intended to create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law by a party against the United States, its agencies, its officers or any person.
§ 3201.129 Facial care products. ( a ) *Definition.* Facial care products are cleansers, moisturizers, and treatments specifically designed for the face. These products are used to care for the condition of the face by supporting skin integrity, enhancing its appearance, and relieving skin conditions. This category does not include tools and applicators, such as those used to apply facial care products.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The Federal preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 88 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than July 6, 2020, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased facial care products. By that date, Federal agencies responsible for drafting or reviewing specifications for products to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased facial care products.
[84 FR 32021, July 5, 2019]
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in
connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Metal Management, Inc. (the
"Corporation") for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the
Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the
Corporation, certifies that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.

/s/ Robert C. Larry
-------------------------------
Robert C. Larry
Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
June 11, 2004

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Corporation and will be retained by the Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 3201.139 Playground and athletic surface materials. ( a ) *Definition.* Playground and athletic surface materials are products that are designed for use on playgrounds and athletic surfaces. Examples include materials that are applied to the surfaces of playgrounds, athletic fields, and other sports surfaces to enhance or change the color or general appearance of the surface and to provide safety and/or performance benefits. Such materials include, but are not limited to, top coatings, primers, line marking paints, and rubberized pellets that are used on athletic courts, tracks, natural or artificial turf, and other playing surfaces. This category does not include the artificial turf or surface itself, as that is included in the carpets product category.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The Federal preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 22 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than July 6, 2020, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased playground and athletic surface materials. By that date, Federal agencies responsible for drafting or reviewing specifications for products to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased playground and athletic surface materials.
( d ) *Determining overlap with a designated product category in the EPA's CPG program.* Qualifying products within this product category may overlap with the EPA's CPG-designated recovered content product categories of Parks and Recreation Products: Playground Surfaces and Running Tracks. USDA is requesting that manufacturers of these qualifying biobased products provide information on the BioPreferred Program's website about the intended uses of the product, information on whether the product contains any recovered material, in addition to biobased ingredients, and performance standards against which the product has been tested. This information will assist Federal agencies in determining whether a qualifying biobased product overlaps with the EPA's CPG-designated product categories of Parks and Recreation Products: Playground Surfaces and Running Tracks and which product should be afforded the preference in purchasing.
Note 1 to Paragraph ( d
):
Playground and athletic surface materials within this designated product category can compete with similar playground and athletic surface materials with recycled content. According to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, section 6002, Federal agencies must give preference in their purchasing programs for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's CPG-designated product categories of Parks and Recreation Products: Playground Surfaces and Running Tracks containing recovered materials as products. The designation can be found in the Comprehensive Procurement Guideline, 40 CFR 247.10.
[84 FR 32021, July 5, 2019]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v David McMath, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, rendered February 22,1979, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. The points raised by appellate counsel at the specific request of defendant concern matters not apparent upon the face of the record and consequently are not cognizable on appeal (see *People v Nagler,*21 AD2d 490, 492). We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious grounds which could be raised on this appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631; cf. *People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606). Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Titone and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
#### Joseph Malinka, Respondent, v. Lawrence Mugavero, Appellant.

Order unanimously reversed, defendant’s motion granted and judgment granted in favor of defendant dismissing plaintiff’s complaint, all without costs. Memorandum: Appellant and respondent are coemployees of an employer who maintains a lot adjacent to its plant for the parking of employees’ automobiles. The action is to recover damages from defendant for injuries sustained by plaintiff as a result of a collision of their automobiles in the parking lot while they were on their way to work. The parties were acting in the course of their employment at the time of the accident. *(Kunze*v. *Jones,*6 A D 2d 888, affd. 8 N Y 2d 1152; *Roberts*v. *Gagnon,*1 A D 2d 297; *Chadwick*v. *Clerk,*19 A D 2d 679; *Smithline*v. *Ghessi,*25 A D 2d 841.) Plaintiff is, therefore, limited to the workman’s compensation benefits and cannot maintain this action against his fellow employee. (Workman’s Compensation Law, § 29, subd. 6.) (Appeal from order of Monroe County Court, denying motion to dismiss complaint.) Present—• Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Marsh, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2

PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERS CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Aleritas Capital Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert D. Orr, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 14, 2008



/s/ Robert D. OrrRobert D. OrrChief Financial Officer
§ 3.22 CCC withholding of payment. ( a ) CCC may temporarily withhold issuance of payment of some or all amounts to a debtor under one or more contracts or programs. Withholding of a payment prior to the completion of an applicable offset procedure may be made from amounts payable to a debtor by CCC to ensure that the interests of CCC and the United States will be protected as provided in this section.
( b ) A payment may be withheld to protect the interests of CCC or the United States if CCC determines that: ( 1 ) There has been a serious breach of contract or violation of program requirements and the withholding action is considered necessary to protect the financial interests of CCC;
( 2 ) There is substantial evidence of violations of criminal or civil fraud laws and criminal prosecution or civil fraud action is of primary importance to program operations of CCC;
( 3 ) Prior experience with the debtor indicates that collection will be difficult if amounts payable to the debtor are not withheld;
( 4 ) There is doubt that the debtor will be financially able to pay a judgment on the claim of CCC;
( 5 ) The facts available to CCC are insufficient to determine the amount to be offset or the proper payee;
( 6 ) A judgement on a claim of CCC has been obtained; or
( 7 ) Such action has been requested by Justice.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

JAMES DERBY, Individually,

Plaintiff,

v.

DISPOSAL SERVICES, LLC, a Florida 

Limited Liability Company,

Defendant.

CASE NO. 5:20-cv-00104-TKW-MJF

JOINT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, pursuant to Rule 16.2(A)(1), Local Rules, U.S. District 

Court, Northern District of Florida, the parties hereby notify the Court that this matter has been 

settled, subject to the parties finalizing an agreement as to the remaining non-monetary terms. 

Respectfully submitted this 24th day of September, 2021.

/s/ Paul M. Botros_______

Paul M. Botros, Esq.

Florida Bar No. 088758 

MORGAN & MORGAN, P.A.

600 N. Pine Island Road, Ste. 400

Plantation, Florida 33324

Tel: (954) 318-0268 

Fax: (954) 327-3016

E-mail: pbotros@forthepeople.com

Trial Counsel for Plaintiff 

/s/ John W. Roberts 

John W. Roberts, Esq.

Florida Bar No. 0108570

john@johnwrobertslaw.com

DAVID S. REHR, ESQ.

Florida Bar No. 117909

david@johnwrobertslaw.com

DANIEL ROSENHEIM

Florida Bar No. 124829

daniel@johnwrobertslaw.com

12273 US Highway 98, West, Ste. 204

Miramar Beach, Florida 32550

Tel: (850) 250-0887 

Fax: (850) 250-2612

Trial Counsel for Defendants

Case 5:20-cv-00104-TKW-MJF Document 20 Filed 09/24/21 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 24th day of September 2021, I electronically filed the 

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system which I understand will send 

a notice of electronic filing to all counsel of record.

/s/ Paul M. Botros

Paul M. Botros, Esq. 

Case 5:20-cv-00104-TKW-MJF Document 20 Filed 09/24/21 Page 2 of 2
#### The State ex rel. Thompson, Appellant, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellee, et al.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Thompson v. Indus. Comm.*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 437.]

(No. 98-75

Submitted September 15, 1998

Decided October 28, 1998.)

*Law Office of Thomas Tootle*and *Thomas Tootle,*for appellant.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Craigg E. Gould,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)

I, Randolph Gress, certify that:

1. the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 (the Report), fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Innophos, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided Innophos, Inc. and will be retained by
Innophos, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The undersigned expressly
disclaims any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.

Date: May 7, 2010



/s/ RANDOLPH GRESSRandolph Gress
Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to the requirements of 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed
as a part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
#### Pioneer Trust and Savings Bank, defendant in error, v. H. H. Herbst, trading as H. H. Herbst and Company, plaintiff in error.

Gen. No. 37,207.

Opinion filed October 24, 1934.

William C. Napier, for plaintiff in error; Sidney Schneider, of counsel. Henry H. ICoven, for defendant in error; Henry W. Kenoe, of counsel.

Mr. Presiding Justice Hebei

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### § 29.3062 Strips.

The sides of a tobacco leaf from which the stem has been removed; or a lot of tobacco composed of strips.

[24 FR 8771, Oct. 29, 1959. Redesignated at 47 FR 51722, Nov. 17, 1982, and at 49 FR 16758, Apr. 20, 1984]
**Exhibit 10.1**Execution Copy**FIRST AMENDMENT TO STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT**     Pursuant to this First Amendment to Stock Purchase Agreement, dated June 30, 2006 (this“***Amendment***”), the parties hereto hereby amend that certain Stock Purchase Agreement dated as ofApril 28, 2006 by and among Alon USA Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and the stockholders ofParamount Petroleum Corporation named on the signature page thereto (the “***Purchase Agreement***”) asexpressly set forth below. Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have themeanings given such terms in the Purchase Agreement. 1. Addition of Schedule 1(b) of the Purchase Agreement. Schedule 1(b)attached hereto as Annex A is hereby added to the Purchase Agreement asSchedule 1(b) thereto.  2. Amendment to Schedule 2.3(a) of the Purchase Agreement. The section ofSchedule 2.3(a) to the Purchase Agreement titled “Phoenix Terminal — Comparison ofTotal Ending Inventory Value and Market Price as of December 31, 2005” is herebydeleted in its entirety and replaced with “Phoenix Terminal — Comparison of TotalEnding Inventory Value and Market Price as of December 31, 2005” attached hereto asAnnex B.  3. Amendment to Schedule 2.3(c) of the Purchase Agreement. Schedule2.3(c)to the Purchase Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced withSchedule 2.3(c) attached hereto as Annex C.  4. Amendment to Schedule 2.3(d) of the Purchase Agreement. Schedule2.3(d) to the Purchase Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced withSchedule 2.3(d) attached hereto as Annex D.  5. Amendment to Schedule 2.4 (b)(i) of the Purchase Agreement. Schedule2.4(b) to the Purchase Agreement is hereby amended to be Schedule 2.4(b)(i).  6. Addition of Schedule 2.4(b)(ii) of the Purchase Agreement. Schedule2.4(b)(ii) attached hereto as Annex E is hereby added to the Purchase Agreementas Schedule 2.4(b)(ii) thereto.  7. Amendment to Sellers’ Disclosure Schedule Section 4.3(a) of the PurchaseAgreement. Sellers’ Disclosure Schedule Section 4.3(a) is hereby deleted in itsentirety and replaced with Sellers’ Disclosure Schedule Section 4.3(a) attached heretoas Annex F.  8. Deletion of Schedule 2.4(b)(iii) of the Purchase Agreement. Thereference in the Schedules to Schedule 2.4(b)(iii)to the Purchase Agreement is herebydeleted in its entirety.
 

 
 9. Amendment to Sellers’ Disclosure Schedule Section 4.15(i) of the PurchaseAgreement. Sellers’ Disclosure Schedule Section 4.15(i) is hereby deleted inits entirety and replaced with Sellers’ Disclosure Schedule Section 4.15(i) attachedhereto as Annex G.  10. Except as expressly amended above, the Purchase Agreement shall continue infull force and effect in accordance with its terms.  11. This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shallbe deemed to be an original and all of which together shall be considered to be onedocument.**[Signature page follows]**
 

 
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this First Amendment to Stock PurchaseAgreement as of the day and year first above written.      ALON USA ENERGY, INC
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

DWANE LASALLE WALKER,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 4:20cv227-MW/MAF

UNITED STATES, et al.,

Defendants. 

_________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report 

and Recommendation, ECF No. 5, and has also reviewed de novo Plaintiff’s 

objections to the report and recommendation, ECF No. 7. Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED: 

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted, over Plaintiff’s

objections, as this Court’s opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating,

“Plaintiff’s complaint, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED as frivolous pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The Clerk shall note on the docket that this cause is dismissed

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).” The Clerk shall also close the file.

SO ORDERED on May13, 2020.

s/ MARK E. WALKER

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00227-MW-MAF Document 8 Filed 05/13/20 Page 1 of 1