alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

**Certification**

I, Tony Aquila, Chief Executive Officer of Solera Holdings, Inc., certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Solera Holdings, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) Designed such internal control over financialreporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: November 6, 2008
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Richard Moore, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
| (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Fox Petroleum Inc. for the quarterly period ended May 31, 2007 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Fox Petroleum Inc.                                                                      |

Dated:  July 23, 2007

 

/s/ Richard Moore

 

Richard Moore

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

Principal Executive Officer 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Fox Petroleum Inc. and will be retained by Fox Petroleum Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 3430.807 Duration of grant.

The term of a Federal assistance award made for a NLGCA project shall not exceed 5 years. No-cost extensions of time beyond the maximum award terms will not be considered or granted.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

PHILLIP KESSLER,

Petitioner,

v. Case No.: 4:19cv468-MW/HTC

SECRETARY OF THE FLORIDA

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

___________________________/ 

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report 

and Recommendation. ECF No. 33. Upon consideration, no objections having been 

filed by the parties,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation, ECF No. 33, is accepted and adopted as 

this Court’s opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “Petitioner’s amended 

petition under 28 U.S.C.§ 2254, ECF No. 1, is DENIED without an evidentiary 

hearing.” A certificate of appealability is DENIED. The Clerk shall close the file.

SO ORDERED on March 29, 2022.

s/Mark E. Walker ____

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:19-cv-00468-MW-HTC Document 34 Filed 03/29/22 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of a market test of an experimental product in accordance with statutory requirements.

# DATES:

November 22, 2010.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

David H. Rubin, 202-268-2986.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3641(c)(1) that it will begin a market test of its “Alternative Postage Payment Method for Greeting Cards” experimental product on January 2, 2011. The Postal Service has filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a notice setting out the basis for the Postal Service's determination that the market test is covered by 39 U.S.C. 3641 and describing the nature and scope of the market test. Documents are available at                     *http://www.prc.gov,*                     Docket No. MT2011-1.                

Neva R. Watson,

Attorney, Legislative.

[FR Doc. 2010-29288 Filed 11-19-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3: 95cr3093 LAC

CHARLES SPIGNER

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on MARCH 14, 2008 

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION FOR REDUCTION OF SENTENCE PURSUANT TO TITLE 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) 

Filed by DEFENDANT PRO SE on3/14/08 Doc.# 187

RESPONSES:

on Doc.#

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Mary Maloy

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 14

th day of

April, 2008, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) At sentencing, the defendant was held accountable for a minimum of 10

kilograms of cocaine base which resulted in a base offense level of 38. Pursuant

to Amendment 706 to the Sentencing Guidelines, the Drug Quantity Table at §2D1.1

assigns a base offense level of 38 for 4.5 kilograms or more of cocaine base.

Since the defendant’s base offense level is unchanged, he is not eligible for any

reduction in his sentence of imprisonment pursuant to Amendment 706. 

 s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

Entered On Docket: By: Senior United States District Judge

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 3:95-cr-03093-LC-CJK Document 189 Filed 04/14/08 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 71449]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29526]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center on Minority and Health Disparities; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center on Minority Health and Health 
Disparities Special Emphasis Panel (R01).
    Date: December 15-16, 2010.
    Time: 7:45 a.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Bethesda Marriott, 5151 Pooks Hill Road, Bethesda, MD 
20892.
    Contact Person: Maryline Laude-Sharp, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, National Institute on Minority Health and Health 
Disparities, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Suite 800, Bethesda, MD 
20892. (301) 451-9536. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8ae7e6ebffeeeff9e2ebf8facae7ebe3e6a4e4e3e2a4ede5fc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="05686964706160766d6477754568646c692b6b6c6d2b626a73">[email protected]</span></a>.


    Dated: November 17, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-29526 Filed 11-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6717

OLIVER JESSE SHAW,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS R. CORCORAN, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL

FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA98-3384-DKC)

Submitted: August 31, 1999 Decided: September 14, 1999

Before WILKINS and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Oliver Jesse Shaw, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s memorandum and order are

marked as “filed” April 13, 1999, the district court’s records show

that they were entered on the docket sheet on April 21, 1999.

Pursuant to rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure, it is the date that the memorandum and order were

entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of

the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d

1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Oliver Jesse Shaw seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. See Shaw v. Corcoran, No. CA-98-

3384-DKC (D. Md. Apr. 21, 1999).* We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
## SERVED JULY26, 2012 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OFHEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC INTHE MATTER OF MONROE AIR CENTERLLC · FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BEASSIGNED) (Civil PenaltyAction) FDMS NO. FAA-2012-0775 NOTICE OFASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING This.proceeding(heretofore designated as CaseNo. 2011SW030084) has been assigned to AdministrativeLawJudgeJ.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications regarding thisproceeding shall be served ontheJudge, the FAAHearing Docket, andthe other persons onthe attached Service List.

Attachment - Service ListSERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence A venue, S. W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC--430 Wilbur WrightBuilding-Sl)ite 2W1000 1 Alan Armstrong, Respondent :s Counsel 2900 Chamblee Tucker Road Building 5, Suite 350

Atlanta, GA 30341 TEL: 770-451-0313 FAX: 770-451-0317

Tim Duff, Complainant's Counsel Office of the Regional Counsel Southwest Region Federal Aviation Administration 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 Ft. Worth, TX 76137 TEL: 817-222,.5099 FAX: 817-222-5092

ONE COPY

The Honorable J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge Office of Hearings, M-20 · U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2132 FAX: 202-366-7536

FDMS No. FAA-2012-0775 (Civil Penalty Action) 'o 1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person ()r by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S. W., Wilbur Wright Building-;--Suite 2Wl 000, Washington, · DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. -2-
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with this Quarterly  Report of Morgan Creek Energy Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Peter
Wilson,  President/Chief  Executive  Officer  and I,  William D.  Thomas,  Chief
Financial  Officer,  of the  Company,  certify  to the  best  of our  knowledge,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  Sec.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to Sec.  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Dated: May 4, 2009

                                       /s/ PETER WILSON
                                       _________________________________________
                                           Peter Wilson
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer



Dated: May 4, 2009

                                      /s/ WILLIAM D. THOMAS
                                       _________________________________________
                                           William D. Thomas
                                           Chief Financial Officer
§ 249.9 Nutrition education. ( a ) *Goal.* Nutrition education shall emphasize the relationship of proper nutrition to good health, including the importance of consuming fruits and vegetables.
( b ) *Requirement.* The State agency shall integrate nutrition education into SFMNP operations and may satisfy nutrition education requirements through coordination with other agencies within the State. State agencies wishing to coordinate nutrition education with another State agency or organization must enter into a written cooperative agreement with such agencies to offer nutrition education relevant to the use and nutritional value of foods available to SFMNP participants. In cases where SFMNP participants are receiving relevant nutrition education from an agency other than the administering State agency, the provision of nutrition education is an allowable administrative cost under the SFMNP.
[J-34-2024]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

IN RE: NOMINATION PETITION OF 

WILLIAM ANDERSON AS DEMOCRATIC 

CANDIDATE FOR THE 24TH 

LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT OBJECTION OF: 

L'OREAL SNELL, AMANDA GREENHAWKINS AND ERIN WISE

APPEAL OF: WILLIAM ANDERSON

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 9 WAP 2024 

Appeal from The Order of the 

Commonwealth Court entered March 

4, 2024 at No. 95 MD 2024. 

SUBMITTED: March 19, 2024 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of March, 2024, the order of the Commonwealth Court is 

AFFIRMED.

Chief Justice Todd and Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or 

decision of this matter.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThe use of Lanczos's method to solve the large generalized symmetric definite eigenvalue problemThe generalized eigenvalue problem, Kx = Lambda Mx, is of significant practical importance, especially in structural enginering where it arises as the vibration and buckling problem. A new algorithm, LANZ, based on Lanczos's method is developed. LANZ uses a technique called dynamic shifting to improve the efficiency and reliability of the Lanczos algorithm. A new algorithm for solving the tridiagonal matrices that arise when using Lanczos's method is described. A modification of Parlett and Scott's selective orthogonalization algorithm is proposed. Results from an implementation of LANZ on a Convex C-220 show it to be superior to a subspace iteration code.Document ID19900002877Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsJones, Mark T.*(Duke Univ. Durham, NC., United States)*Patrick, Merrell L.*(Duke Univ. Durham, NC., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateSeptember 1, 1989Subject CategoryComputer Programming And SoftwareReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:181914NASA-CR-181914ICASE-89-69AD-A214443Accession Number90N12193Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG1-466CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-18605CONTRACT_GRANT: AF-AFOSR-0117-88Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900002877.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
NORTHEASTHEUCOPTERS 

FLIGH T S E R V I C E S LLC 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docked Management System 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 

Washington, DC 20590 

July 8,2010 

To Whom It May Concern: c£, 

My name is Timothy Dunn and I am the Chief Pilot at Northeast Helicopters located in Ellington Ct. 

Northeast Helicopters operates under 14 CFR Part 135 and 91.147 with pilots common to both. We are 

required to have a separate Drug and Alcohol Testing Program for each operation. 

I would like to request an exemptiim from the regulation diat requires us to have two separate Drug and 

Alcohol Testing Programs. 

Northeast Helicopters is a small operation. It operates with 4 helicopters, 5 pilots and 1 mechanic. 

The money, time and pers(Mmel cost of maintaining two separate Drug and Alcohol Testing Programs 

would be burdensome to the company due to its size and stafBng. 

Granting the exemption would benefit the public as a whole by allowing the company to keep its costs 

lower having to maintain only one Drug and Alcohol Testing Program. 

Granting the exemption would not have any impact on the level of safety. All persons (m the program will 

be held to the standard of the Drug and Alcohol Testing Program and undo* the supervision of the Chief 

Pilot. 

In summary, during these difficult times, small operators v^o operate under 14 CFR 135 and 91 should not 

have to be burdened widi maintaining two separate Drug and Alcohol Testing Programs when one 

program is sufficient due to the size of the operation. 

Thank you for your time and consideraticHi on this request I look forward to hearing from you. 

Cordially, 

Timothy Dunn 

Chief Flight Instructor 

Northeast Helicopters 

Hangar Two • Ellington Airport • P.O. Box 497 • Ellington, CT 06029 

•'C3 

— I 

CD 

Phone (860) 871-2054 • Fax (860) 875-2861 • www.northeasthelicopters.com