alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 322.32 Mailed packages. ( a ) If you import a restricted article through the mail or through commercial express delivery, you must mark all sides of the outside of that package with the contents of the shipment and the name of the exporting region. The marking must be clearly visible using black letters at least 1 inch in height on a white background.
( b ) If you import a restricted article through commercial express delivery, you must provide an accurate description of the complete contents of the shipment for the shipment's delivery manifest entry.
( c ) In addition to the export certificate required in § 322.30 (if applicable), a restricted article that is imported by mail or commercial express delivery must be accompanied by an invoice or packing list accurately indicating the complete contents of the shipment.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0579-0207)
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS CHADWICK TATE NO. 

### 2024 KW 0266 

### MAY 20, 

### 2024 In Re: Chadwick Tate, 

### applying for 

### supervisory writs, 

### 19th Judicial District Court, Parish of 

### East Baton Rouge, No. 

### 12-92-0660. BEFORE: McCLENDON, HESTER, AND MILLER, JJ.

WRIT DENIED.



### T OFAPPEAL, 

### FIRST CIRCUIT



### YCLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT PMC CHH 

### SMM
# L_2020320EN.01000101.xml

| 2.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 320/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 320/1

---

COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2020/1380

of 1 October 2020

implementing Article 21(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/44 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) 2016/44 of 18 January 2016 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya and repealing Regulation (EU) No 204/2011 (1), and in particular Article 21(2) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 18 January 2016, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) 2016/44. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 18 January 2016, the Council adopted Regulation (EU) 2016/44.

| (2) | On the basis of a review by the Council, the entries for two persons should be deleted. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On the basis of a review by the Council, the entries for two persons should be deleted.

| (3) | Annex III to Regulation (EU) 2016/44 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex III to Regulation (EU) 2016/44 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Annex III to Regulation (EU) 2016/44 is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 1 October 2020.

For the Council

The President

M. ROTH

---

(1)  
  OJ L 12, 19.1.2016, p. 1.

1

---

ANNEX

In Annex III (List of natural and legal persons, entities or bodies referred to in Article 6(2)), entry 17 (concerning SALEH ISSA GWAIDER, Agila) and entry 19 (concerning ABU SAHMAIN, Nuri) are deleted from the list set out in Part A (Persons).

---
#### § 2903.18 Access to review information.

Copies of reviews, not including the identity of reviewers, and a summary of the comments will be sent to the applicant PD after the review process has been completed.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER SPURLOCK,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 3:19cv3592-MCR-HTC

JAMES D. BURNHAM, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report 

and Recommendation dated April 14, 2020. ECF No. 16. The parties have been 

furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an 

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 

636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections 

thereto timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should 

be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this Order.

Case 3:19-cv-03592-MCR-HTC Document 18 Filed 05/15/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:19cv3592-MCR-HTC

2. Defendant Burnham’s Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 11, is GRANTED.

3. Plaintiff’s claims against all Defendants are DISMISSED WITHOUT 

PREJUDICE.

4. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 15th day of May 2020.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:19-cv-03592-MCR-HTC Document 18 Filed 05/15/20 Page 2 of 2
#### § 319.24a Administrative instructions relating to entry of corn into Guam.

Corn may be imported into Guam without further permit, other than the authorization contained in this section but subject to compliance with § 319.24-3. Such imports need not comply with the notice of arrival requirements of § 319.24-4 inasmuch as information equivalent to that in a notice of arrival is available to the inspector from another source. Section 319.24-5 shall not be applicable to importations of corn into Guam. Such importations shall be subject to inspection at the port of entry. Corn found upon inspection to contain disease infection will be subject to sterilization in accordance with methods selected by the inspector from administratively authorized procedures known to be effective under the conditions in which applied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<PAGE>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<CURRENCY>                               U. S. DOLLARS
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             330
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,826
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,375
<INVENTORY>                                     23,746
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,095
<PP&E>                                          18,188
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,893
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  34,138
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           64,824
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           269
<OTHER-SE>                                    (57,060)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    34,138
<SALES>                                        160,100
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               160,100
<CGS>                                          125,422
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  168,596
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (113)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,030
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (16,413)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        50
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (16,463)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (16,463)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.63)
        



</TABLE>
# L_2020245EN.01000101.xml

| 30.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 245/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 245/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2020/1120

of 23 July 2020

conferring protection under Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the name ‘Adamclisi’ (PDO)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (1), and in particular Article 99 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | In accordance with Article 97(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the Commission has examined the application to register the name ‘Adamclisi’ forwarded by Romania and has published it in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In accordance with Article 97(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the Commission has examined the application to register the name ‘Adamclisi’ forwarded by Romania and has published it in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | No statement of objection has been received by the Commission under Article 98 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

No statement of objection has been received by the Commission under Article 98 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013.

| (3) | In accordance with Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the name ‘Adamclisi’ should be protected and entered in the register referred to in Article 104 of that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In accordance with Article 99 of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013, the name ‘Adamclisi’ should be protected and entered in the register referred to in Article 104 of that Regulation.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Adamclisi’ (PDO) is hereby protected.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 July 2020.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 51, 14.2.2020, p. 46.

2

---
DCACTIVE-25398905.2

Jurisdictions Restricting Masonry Heaters

A non-exclusive list jurisdictions that prohibit masonry heaters includes: 

California

1. Bay Area Air Quality Management District (“BAAQMD”) (San Francisco and environs): 

Allows only EPA certified appliances.

2. Kern County: Allows only pellet and EPA certified appliances.

3. City of Los Altos: Allows only pellet stoves and EPA certified appliances.

4. Marin County: Defers to the BAAQMD, and allows only pellet and EPA certified 

appliances.

5. San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District: Allows only pellet and EPA 

certified appliances.

6. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency (Lake Tahoe and environs): Exempts pellet stoves but 

otherwise allows only EPA certified appliances.

Other

1. Town of Jackson, Wyoming: Excludes masonry fireplaces from the definition of “solidfuel burning devices” and prohibits installation of devices not in compliance with EPA 

standards.

2. Numerous jurisdictions in, among other places, Colorado, Arizona, Utah, Idaho, and 

Montana.

A non-exclusive list of other jurisdictions that heavily and non-uniformly regulate masonry

heaters includes:

1. Maricopa County Air Pollution Control District: Allows masonry heaters and other 

devices only which meet “performance standards that are equivalent to the standards in 

40 CFR 60, Subpart AAA as amended through July 1, 1998, and that is approved by the 

Control Officer and the Administrator of EPA”.

2. Mendocino County Air Quality Management District: Allows masonry heaters, but 

requires a 10” veneer which essentially makes any masonry heater built in conformity to 

be unable to perform its function.

3. San Luis Obispo County Air Pollution Control District: Has approved four masonry

heater models (based on Washington and Colorado testing), but refuses to approve any 

more.

4. Northern Sonoma Air Pollution Control District (Napa and environs): Formally allows 

EPA certified or District-approved masonry heaters, but the district has refused to 

approve any masonry heater.

5. Missoula City/County Health Department in Montana: Allows only pellet stoves inside 

the city limits. Outside the city limits, only one masonry heater model by the largest 

manufacturer Tulikivi has been approved, after petitioning based on the model’s 

Washington testing.
#### ANSTEAD, Respondent, v. WOODWARD et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 8, 1906.)

Action by Belle H. Anstead against Willis Woodward and I. Waldman Teschner.

No opinion, Order affirmed on argument, with $10 costs and disbursements,
#### § 3430.208 Review of applications.

In addition to the scientific peer review (*see* § 3430.33), NIFA will regularly conduct a panel of specialty crop industry representatives to review and rank applications for merit, relevance and impact.

[81 FR 6415, Feb. 8, 2016]
**EXHIBIT 31.2****Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934**I, Christopher A. Black, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Barge Line Company;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:          (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurescontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;          (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and          (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over the financialreporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):          (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.                        /s/ Christopher A. Black   Christopher A. Black   Senior Vice President andChief Financial Officer   Date:August 14, 2006
66
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice of Members for the FY 2010 Performance Review Board.

# SUMMARY:

Title 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4) requires each agency to publish notification of the appointment of individuals who may serve as members of that Agency's Performance Review Board (PRB). The following individuals have been designated to serve on the FY 2010 Performance Review Board for the U.S. Small Business Administration.

1. David B. Robbins, Chair, Associate Administrator for Management and Administration.

2. Jonathan I. Carver, Chief Financial Officer and Associate Administrator for Performance Management.

3. James E. Rivera, Deputy Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.

4. Sara D. Lipscomb, General Counsel.

5. Ana M. Ma, Chief of Staff.

Karen G. Mills,

Administrator.

[FR Doc. 2010-29611 Filed 11-23-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
#### AMERICAN RADIATOR CO. v. SHIRLEY RADIATOR *&*FOUNDRY CO.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

May 3, 1912.)

No. 1,664.

Patents (§ 328*) — Validity and Infringement — Design for Radiator.

The AVoolley design patent, No. 36,607, for a design for a steam radiator, *held*valid, but not infringed.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Indiana.

*425Suit in equity by the American Radiator Company against the Shirley Radiator & Foundry Company. Decree for defendant, and complainant appeals.

Affirmed.

Bill for infringement of design patent No. 36,607, issued to Clarence M. Woolley, October 27, 1893, for an ornamental design for a steam radiator for use in dwelling houses. Defendant’s design is known as the" “Shirley,” and complainant’s as the “Premier.” The two are quite similar in appearance to the casual observer, but differences in detail are quite apparent on closer inspection. The decoration on each is from the pattern of the Acanthus leaf in the form of a foliated scroll, but in the defendant’s design the leaf is turned upside down as compared with the patented one. The form of the top and the logs are also distinct. In one there are three, and in the other four, cross-connections. Both designs are attractive in appearance, are simply but effectively adorned. They have three columns, the two outer ones convex, and the middle one concave, a series of short intermediate bridges between the columns having curved edges, graceful downward diverging legs, and shoulders at the top, also employing the curve or wavy line. The side columns in each are conically curved in cross section, being thicker near the inner edge, and diminishing outward by a compound curve. The accompanying cuts show these features clearly.

Complainant’s Forms.

*426Defendant’s Forms.

Charles K. Offield (Offield, Towle, Graves & Offield and Rolland J. Hamilton, of counsel), for appellant.

Charles Martindale, for appellee.

Before KOHLSAAT and MACK, Circuit Judges, and SAN-BORN, District Judge.

*

For other cases see same topic *&*§ number in Dec. *&*Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Kep’r Indexes

SANBORN, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above). It ¡is not claimed that the Acanthus leaf (found in all of the ancient art), or any of the single elements used by the patentee in his design, are at all new. What he asserts is that he has gathered together into a unitary and harmonious structure the various features of the old art, including the foliated scroll, in simple, chaste, and modest form, and has thus made use of the inventive faculty.

The St. Louis, Premier, and Shirley were exhibited side by side in the courtroom at the time of the argument. We thought then, and further examination convinces us, that defendant’s radiator does not infringe. There is nearly as much difference between the Shirley and Premier as the Premier and St.. Louis. Both patents may be treated as valid, within narrow limits.

Affirmed.