alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2023663675 Line OSTW85 310 033436 p.m. 04 152010 1 11 

GLENN MGTn THOMPSON COMMIl'TEeS, 

6TH DISTRICT. fA'ENNSVl.VANlA ctCongrtt(t(of tbe llntttb ~tattt( AGRICULTURE

EDUCATION AND LABOR 124 CANNON HouSi OFfICE BUIlDiNG :I!}OU9't of l\£Prt9'tntatfbe~ 1202) Z26-5121 

(2021225-6798 (FAA) SMALL BUSINESS .asUington. J)(: 20515-3805 

April 15.2010 

The Honorable Ray LaHood. Secretary 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ayenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: DOT-OST-20J0-0074, Establishment ofthe Future ofAviation Advisory Committee 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

Jam pleased to learn of DOT's intent to establish the Future ofAviation AdvisoryCommittee, in 

order to make recommendations to address the continued competitiveness and needs ofthe U.S. 

aviation industry. 

With this announcement, I write to offer my strong support for the appointment of Maurice·A. 

Parker to the committee. Mr. Parker is currently President and Executive Director of Regional 

Aviation Partners (RAP), an advocacy group representing the interests ofsmall community air 

service stakeholders with the goal ofpreserving the Essential Air Service Program. 

Mr. Parker has an extensive government career spanning over 30 years. His previous 

employment history included work with the FAA, National Labor Relations Board, National 

Mediation Board - where he held the position of Head Mediator from 1918 until his retirement 

in 1991, and the Social Security Administration. Additionally, Mr. Parker has served as a 

Member ofthe Board of Directors of Mesa Air Group, Inc, since November 1998. 

During my tenure in Congress, Mr. Parker has served as a valuable resource. He has provided 

continued advocacy and a strong voice for the often over-looked small, rural, community airports 

and the carriers that provide them with a vital link to our national transportation system. Mr. 

Parker's knowledge an advocacy not only has served my rural district, but countless 

communities across the country. 

Because ofhis extensive background and expertise with a critical portion of the aviation 

industry, JrespectfuI1y request your sincere consideration of Mr. Maurice A. Parker as an 

appointee to the Future Aviation Advisory Committee. 

Sincerely, 

rll--.GT-~........ 
 G~hompson . 

Member ofCongress 

TITUSVILLE flEu.EFONTE 

127 West Sf'IIlNG Sl'I!EET. Sum; C . http://thompson.house.gov 3555 BENNEP 1'u<E. SUIT!! 101 

TITU!Mt.LE. PA 16364 BeU.EFOl<I1E. PA 16823 

18141821-3985 1814) 827-7307IFAX) PRINTED Dill RECYCLED PAPER (814Ill!i.14l'lfi (Rl.t)~'lR(FAX) 

S10-100415-022
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF MICHAEL A. CREEL, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**OF EPE HOLDINGS, LLC, THE GENERAL PARTNER OF**

**ENTERPRISE GP HOLDINGS L.P.**

 

In connection with this quarterly report of Enterprise GP Holdings L.P. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael A. Creel, Chief Executive Officer of EPE Holdings, LLC, the general partner of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

___/s/ Michael A. Creel_____________________________________
| Name: | Michael A. Creel |  
Title:  

Chief Executive Officer of EPE Holdings, LLC

 
on behalf of Enterprise GP Holdings L.P.

 
 

Date:  

November 8, 2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  |
|-------|------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 10.10

                        ADDENDUM TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

         This Addendum to Employment Agreement (hereinafter "AGREEMENT") is made
by and between W. Peter Ragan, Jr., 3100 Route 138 West, STE B, Wall, NJ 07719
(hereinafter "EMPLOYEE"), and Velocity Investments, LLC, on behalf of itself,
its subsidiaries, affiliates, predecessors, successors, assigns; and their
directors, officers, employees and agents (hereinafter collectively referred to
as "VELOCITY"), with its principal place of business, 3100 Route 138 West, STE
A, Wall, NJ 07719.

         WHEREAS, VELOCITY and EMPLOYEE have entered into an Employment
Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2004 (the "Employment Agreement") and

         WHEREAS, VELOCITY and the EMPLOYEE desire to amend certain provisions
of the Employment Agreement,

         NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual and respective
covenants and agreements contained herein, VELOCITY and EMPLOYEE agree as
follows:

         1.       The Employee hereby confirms that no salary has been paid to
him or accrued during the period between January 1, 2004 and August 31, 2004,
and EMPLOYEE hereby waives any right to the payment of such salary. Payment of
salary at the rate stated in the Employment Agreement shall begin on September
1, 2004 and shall be paid bi-monthly less mandatory and authorized deductions.

         2.       Except as provided above, the Employment Agreement shall
remain in full force and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this ADDENDUM as of the
date first above written.

VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC                 EMPLOYEE


By: /s/ JAMES J. MASTRIANI                /s/ W. PETER RAGAN, JR.
    ------------------------------        ------------------------------------
    James J. Mastriani, Esq.              W. Peter Ragan, Esq.
    CFO & CLO

Dated:   September 1, 2004                Dated:   September 1, 2004
**Exhibit 31.2**

I, Kolja Rockov,certify that:

1.                        I havereviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Linn Energy, LLC (the“registrant”);

2.                        Based onmy knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                        Based onmy knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                        Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)                   Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)                  Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)                   Disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterial affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.                        Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)                   All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b)                  Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  May 14,2007
| /s/ Kolja Rockov                                      |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Kolja Rockov                                          |
| Executive Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### October 23, 2012 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS TENTH CIRCUIT

DEMETRIUS TOMAZ ROGERS, Plaintiff–Appellant,

v. RAYMOND E. DENECKE, Defendant–Appellee. No. 12-6198 (D.C. No. 5:12-CV-00373-R) (W.D. Oklahoma)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before BRISCOE , Chief Judge, McKAY and HOLMES , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). This case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Plaintiff Demetrius Rogers, a pro se Oklahoma state prisoner, challenges the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 prisoner complaint. In his complaint, Plaintiff alleged that Defendant, the assistant public defender who represented him in his state criminal

* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.case, deprived him of his right to due process by advising him to accept a plea agreement rather than proceed to trial because of his race. Plaintiff’s complaint also included a state malpractice claim. The magistrate judge recommended that the district court dismiss Plaintiff’s § 1983 claim because, as set forth in Polk County. v. Dodson , 454 U.S. 312, 325 (1981), Defendant, as a public defender, was not acting under color of state law when he represented Plaintiff in the criminal proceeding. The magistrate judge further recommended that the district court decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law malpractice claim. After reviewing Plaintiff’s objections, the district court agreed. It adopted the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint. Nothing in Plaintiff’s brief or the appellate record persuades us there was any error in the magistrate judge’s analysis or the district court’s order. Therefore, for substantially the same reasons given by the magistrate judge and the district court, we AFFIRM the dismissal of Plaintiff’s complaint. Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is GRANTED . Plaintiff is reminded of his obligation to continue making partial payments until his entire filing fee has been paid in full. Entered for the Court

Monroe G. McKay Circuit Judge

-2-
```

[108th Congress Public Law 416]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ416.108]

[[Page 118 STAT. 2338]]

Public Law 108-416
108th Congress

                            Joint Resolution

 
 Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2005, and 
     for other purposes. <<NOTE: Nov. 21, 2004 -  [H.J. Res. 114]>> 

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law 108-309 is 
amended by striking the date specified in section <<NOTE: Ante, p. 
1138.>> 107(c) and inserting the following: ``December 3, 2004''.

    Approved November 21, 2004.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.J. Res. 114:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):
            Nov. 20, considered and passed House and Senate.

                                  <all>
```
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2012 - 018 9 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2011 -NM - 1 33 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: 

### 2011 - 0096 **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, list latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR - M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Man ager**  **Date**
<PAGE>




                                   EXHIBIT 21

                        SUBSIDIARIES OF UNUM CORPORATION


     Listed below are subsidiaries of UNUM Corporation, as of December 31, 1995,
with their respective jurisdiction of incorporation.

     UNUM Holding Company (Delaware)

          First UNUM Life Insurance Company (New York)
          UNUM Sales Corporation (Delaware)
          Claims Service International, Inc. (Delaware)

     UNUM Life Insurance Company of America (Maine)

     Colonial Companies, Inc. (Delaware)

          Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Company (South Carolina)
          BenefitAmerica, Inc. (South Carolina)

     Commercial Life Insurance Company (Wisconsin)

     UNUM European Holding Company Limited (United Kingdom)

          UNUM Limited (United Kingdom)

     Duncanson & Holt, Inc. (New York)

          Duncanson & Holt Services, Inc. (Maine)
          Group Management Services, Inc. (Washington)
          Duncanson & Holt Canada Ltd. (Canada)
          Duncanson & Holt Asia PTE Ltd. (Singapore)
          Duncanson & Holt Europe Ltd. (United Kingdom)

               Duncanson & Holt Underwriters Ltd. (United Kingdom)

     UNUM Japan Accident Insurance Company Limited (Japan)
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-MJF Document 13 Filed 09/24/20 Page 1 of 7
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-MJF Document 13 Filed 09/24/20 Page 2 of 7
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-MJF Document 13 Filed 09/24/20 Page 3 of 7
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-MJF Document 13 Filed 09/24/20 Page 4 of 7
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-MJF Document 13 Filed 09/24/20 Page 5 of 7
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-MJF Document 13 Filed 09/24/20 Page 6 of 7
Case 3:20-cv-05484-TKW-MJF Document 13 Filed 09/24/20 Page 7 of 7
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

In The Matter Of: 

JOSEPH MARIDON, SR. 

Respondent 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS [~ 

WASHINGTON, DC i li 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

0 2 2015 

Hr:llcOINr;; DOCKET c.:~ H d ~ "-" 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0116 

Case No. 2012WP190142 

Jndge J. E Sullivan 

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS OF RESPONDENT'S CO-COUNSEL 

Please take notice that Respondent's Co-Counsel's address and contact information has 

changed. 

From: 

Walter L. Ayers 

13435 N. Whitehouse Court 

Spokane, W A 99208 

To: 

Walter L. Ayers 

Attorney at Law 

Ayers Law Firm, P.L.L.C. 

1312 N. Monroe St., Snite 133 

Spokane, W A 99201 

TEL: 509-252-6005/509-863-1432 

E-MAIL: 't:!J:I,LU:JSli(kU'_t!i!:d_,t'L'rLJ:Ll{i\fLJ'iUi 

ALL NOTICES AND DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE SENT TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS 

Walter L. Ayer 

Attorney at Law 

Co-Counsel for Respondent 

Ayers Law Firm, P.L.L.C. 

1312 N. Monroe St., Suite 133 

Spokane, W A 9920 1 

DATED~M/L 
Docket No. F AA-2014-0116 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE- BY U.S. MAIL 

I hereby certify that the foregoing NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS OF RESPONDENT'S 

CO-COUNSEL has been served by placing the same in the U. S. Mail postage pre-paid to the 

following: 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence A v e n u e , S. W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk. AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building--Suite 2W1 000 

Mr. David F. Shayne 

Complainant's Counsel 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

1601 Lind Ave. SW 

Renton, W A 98057 

TEL: 425-227-2165 

FAX: 425-227-1007 

Mr. Joseph R. Maridon, Jr. 

Respondent's Co- Counsel 

Attorney at Law 

6130 Elton Ave 

Las Vegas, NV 89107 

Dated: July 28,2016 

ONE COPY 

Joseph Maridon, Sr 

Respondent 

9212 E. Frederick Ave 

Spokane, WA 99206-4303 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

US. Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-6941 

FAX: 202-366-7536 
rs .. 

aw' .· .. 

m, P.L.L.C. 

oe St, Suite 133 

99201 

...,.,. ___ _ 

·..-,.,_._, .J,· ..-:,--

<:r<"•"'" "' '= ,'tl ill: •. df-'/. -.:to:.'!:M•·" 

JJUL · :P,{t,;Jr:3 _L 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S. W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC·430 

Wilbur Wright Building .. Suite 2W1DDO 

/>'c•..-":/' 

jj '1'1'' 'II. I j •i+ jljl'.l'' 'I'Jli IJ• j lj i j' jl ';lu jl ;I• ,i] ii I•IJ•
Editorial Note on Part 3401
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 3401 appear at 76 FR 4806, Jan. 27, 2011.

§ 3401.13 Composition of peer review groups. Peer review group members will be selected based upon their training or experience in relevant scientific or technical fields, taking into account the following factors: ( a ) The level of formal scientific or technical education by the individual;
( b ) The extent to which the individual has engaged in relevant research, the capacities in which the individual has done so (e.g., principal investigator, assistant), and the quality of such research;
( c ) Professional recognition as reflected by awards and other honors received from scientific and professional organizations outside of the Department;
( d ) The need of the group to include within its membership experts from various areas of specialization within relevant scientific or technical fields;
( e ) The need of the group to include within its membership experts from a variety of organizational types (e.g., universities, industry, private consultant(s)) and geographic locations; and
( f ) The need of the group to maintain a balanced membership, e.g., minority and female representation and an equitable age distribution.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. 4:92cr4013-WS

MARLIN DAVIS, 4:09cv248-WS

Defendant.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc.

1897) docketed July 20, 2009. The magistrate judge recommends that the defendant's

"Writ of Error Audita Querela" (doc. 1895) be summarily denied. The defendant has

filed objections (doc. 1898) to the report and recommendation.

Upon review of the record in light of the defendant’s objections, the court has

determined that the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation must be adopted. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 1897) is adopted

and incorporated by reference in this order of the court.

2. The defendant’s "Writ of Error Audita Querela" (doc. 1895) is summarily

DENIED.
Page 2 of 2

Case No 4:92cr4013-WS

3. The clerk shall close Case No. 4:09cv248-WS.

DONE AND ORDERED this 10th day of August , 2009.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hemis Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1.
     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: May  20, 2008
     /s/ Norman MeierNorman MeierPresident, Chief Executive Officer,Chief Financial Officer


---
#### The State ex rel. Wilson, Appellant, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellee.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Wilson v. Indus. Comm.*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 438.]

(No. 98-100

Submitted September 15, 1998

Decided October 28, 1998.)

*Becker, Reed, Tilton & Hastings*and *Dennis A. Becker,*for appellant.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Cheryl J. Nester,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
#### § 29.9207 Nonquota tobacco.

Any kind or type of tobacco not subject to production and/or marketing limitations or restrictions under regulations issued by the Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service.
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of American CommercialLines Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for theperiod ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Christopher A. Black, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    result of operations of the Company.     /s/ Christopher A. Black       Christopher A. Black     Senior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerAugust 11, 2006