alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2372 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2372

 To amend the Controlled Substances Act and the Controlled Substances 
Import and Export Act regarding penalties for cocaine offenses, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 13, 2013

Mr. Scott of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was referred 
to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on 
Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Controlled Substances Act and the Controlled Substances 
Import and Export Act regarding penalties for cocaine offenses, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fairness in Cocaine Sentencing Act 
of 2013''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF INCREASED PENALTIES FOR COCAINE OFFENSES WHERE 
              THE COCAINE INVOLVED IS COCAINE BASE.

    (a) Controlled Substances Act.--The following provisions of the 
Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 801 et seq.) are repealed:
            (1) Clause (iii) of section 401(b)(1)(A).
            (2) Clause (iii) of section 401(b)(1)(B).
            (3) The sentence beginning ``Notwithstanding the preceding 
        sentence'' in section 404(a).
    (b) Controlled Substances Import and Export Act.--The following 
provisions of the Controlled Substances Import and Export Act (21 
U.S.C. 951 et seq.) are repealed:
            (1) Subparagraph (C) of section 1010(b)(1).
            (2) Subparagraph (C) of section 1010(b)(2).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32
                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection with the Quarterly Report of AEI Income  &  Growth
Fund  26 LLC (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended
March  31,  2007,  as  filed  with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission  on  the date hereof (the "Report"), the  undersigned,
Robert  P.  Johnson, President of AEI Fund Management XXI,  Inc.,
the  Managing Member of the Company, and Patrick W. Keene,  Chief
Financial Officer of AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc., each certify,
pursuant  to  18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section  906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The  Report  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The   information  contained  in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Company.


                          /s/ Robert P Johnson
                              Robert P. Johnson, President
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing Member
                              January 7, 2008



                          /s/ Patrick W Keene
                              Patrick W. Keene, Chief Financial Officer
                              AEI Fund Management XXI, Inc.
                              Managing Member
                              January 7, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2478 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2478

    To repeal a limitation on Federal procurement of certain fuels.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 25, 2013

Mr. Conaway (for himself, Mr. Cuellar, Mr. Flores, Mr. Hensarling, Mr. 
Gene Green of Texas, Mr. Gingrey of Georgia, Mrs. Lummis, Mr. Matheson, 
 and Mr. Rahall) introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
            the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To repeal a limitation on Federal procurement of certain fuels.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Section 526 Repeal Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL.

    Section 526 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (42 
U.S.C. 17142) is repealed.
                                 <all>
```
U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF-2398

 Map Showing Seacliff Response to Climatic and Seismic Events, Depot Hill, Santa Cruz County, California

*By* Cheryl J. Hapke, Bruce M. Richmond, *and* Mimi   M. D'Iorio 

2002

*Aerial photograph of the southern edge of Depot Hill, Santa Cruz, CA. Continued erosion along nearly vertical faults in the soft sedimentary rocks of the Purisima Formation has caused slow, but steady loss of developed home sites.*

----

Files available for downloading:

 - PDF version of this map (784 kb).
 - Encapsulated PostScript version of this map (65.3 MB)

For questions about the scientific content of this report, contact Cheryl   Hapke

Download  a free copy of Adobe Reader 

This report is available via print on demand.

| Help| PDF help || Publications main page| Miscellaneous Field Studies Maps || Department of the Interior| U.S. Geological Survey || Geologic Division| Coastal and Marine Geology|| Privacy Statement| Disclaimer| Accessibility |

URL of this page is: https://pubs.usgs.gov/mf/2002/2398/Please send comments and suggestions, or report problems, to:Michael DigglesUpdated: April 23, 2007 (bwr, mfd)
§ 3201.82 Foot care products. ( a ) *Definition.* Products formulated to be used in the soothing or cleaning of feet.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The Federal preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 83 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than April 4, 2013, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased foot care products. By that date, Federal agencies that have the responsibility for drafting or reviewing specifications for products to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased foot care products.
[77 FR 20289, Apr. 4, 2012]
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Puerto Rico, 2000. [Population and housing unit counts] : Cifras depoblaci�n y de unidades vivienda : censo 2000 de poblaci�n y vivienda. 2000census of population and housing = Puerto Rico, 2000.
 
SuDoc:C 3.223/5:2000PHC-3-53/ENG./SPAN.
ItemNumber:0159-B-53(online)
CGPsystem Number:000572501
 
English/Ingles
 
Spanish/Espanol**
#### § 330.109 Caution.

In applying treatments or taking other measures prescribed in administrative instructions or by the inspector, it should be understood that inexactness or carelessness may result in injury or damage.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO: 3:98cr49/RV 

3:02cv306/RV/MD

EARNEST SOLOMON HICKS

_____________________________________________________________________

ORDER

The defendant has filed a notice of appeal (doc. 123) and a motion for certificate of

appealability (doc. 124) with respect to the order entered on March 28, 2005 (doc. 121).

Unless a certificate of appealability is issued, the defendant may not take an appeal from

the final order denying section 2255 relief. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(1)(B). Such a certificate

may issue “only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).

Because the defendant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right, and for the reasons set forth in this court’s order of March 28, 2005, a

certificate of appealability is DENIED.

No motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis has been filed. The defendant has

not shown that the appeal is taken in good faith or that he is otherwise entitled to so 

proceed on appeal. Accordingly, the $255.00 filing fee shall be paid within 30 days from

the date of this order.

DONE AND ORDERED this 16th day of May, 2005.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:98-cr-00049-RV-EMT Document 129 Filed 05/16/05 Page 1 of 1
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

J.C.,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 4:20-cv-283-AW-MAF

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

et al.,

Defendants.

________________________________

J.P.,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 4:20-cv-317-AW-MAF

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER EXTENDING STAY AND DENYING MOTIONS TO DISMISS

This order confirms the rulings from today’s telephonic hearing. The case will 

be stayed for 60 days. No later than June 17, 2022, Plaintiffs must file status reports.

Based on the settlements, the government’s motions to dismiss (4:20-cv-283 

ECF No. 15; 4:20-cv-317 ECF No. 12) are DENIED as moot.

The clerk will file this order in Case No. 4:20-cv-283 only.

Case 4:20-cv-00283-AW-MAF Document 83 Filed 04/18/22 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED on April 18, 2022. 

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00283-AW-MAF Document 83 Filed 04/18/22 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. 3:97cr81/RV

3:97cr92/RV

3:97cr103/RV

CHRISTOPHER SUMMERS

ORDER

The defendant has filed a request for a certificate of appealability in each of the

above-styled cases. Defendant appeals the court’s denial of his Rule 60(b) motion, styled

“motion to void judgment, order or proceeding under Title 28 U.S.C. Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure, Rule 60(b)(4)(5)(6)” in each case. Unless a certificate of appealability is issued,

the defendant may not take an appeal from the final order denying a Rule 60(b) motion.

Gonzalez v. Secretary of Department of Corrections, 317 F.3d 1308, 1312 (11th Cir. 2003).

A certificate of appealability should not issue in the appeal from the denial of a Rule 60(b)

motion in a habeas case unless the petitioner/defendant shows, at a minimum, that it is

debatable among jurists of reason whether the district court abused its discretion, see

Mobley v. Head, 306 F.3d 1096, 1097 (11th Cir. 2002) (“This Court reviews a denial of a

60(b) motion for an abuse of discretion.”). Because the court finds the defendant has not

made the requisite showing, his requests for a certificate of appealability are DENIED. 

Defendant has not filed motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The court

finds that the appeals are not taken in good faith and he is not otherwise entitled to so

proceed. Fed.R.App.P. 24(a)(3). Therefore, defendant shall pay the $455.00 filing fee in

each case within thirty days.

Case 3:97-cr-00092-RV-CJK Document 36 Filed 05/18/07 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 3:96cr57/RV; 3:03cv2/RV/MD

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

The clerk is directed to place a copy of this order in each of the above-styled cases.

Defendant’s requests for certificates of appealability are DENIED in each case.

Defendant shall pay the $455.00 filing fee in each case within thirty days from the

date of this order.

DONE AND ORDERED this 18th day of May, 2007.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:97-cr-00092-RV-CJK Document 36 Filed 05/18/07 Page 2 of 2
```

[108th Congress Public Law 369]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ369.108]

[[Page 118 STAT. 1749]]

Public Law 108-369
108th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To extend for eighteen months the period for which chapter 12 of title 
   11, United States Code, is reenacted. <<NOTE: Oct. 25, 2004 -  [S. 
                                2864]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and <<NOTE: Family Farmer Bankruptcy 
Relief Act of 2004.>> House of Representatives of the United States of 
America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 11 USC 101 note.>> SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Family Farmer Bankruptcy Relief Act 
of 2004''.
SEC. 2. EIGHTEEN-MONTH EXTENSION OF PERIOD FOR WHICH CHAPTER 12 OF 
                    TITLE 11, UNITED STATES CODE, IS REENACTED.

    (a) Amendments.--Section 149 of title I of division C of Public Law 
105-277 (11 U.S.C. 1201 note) <<NOTE: 11 USC 1201-1208, 1221-1231.>> is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``January 1, 2004'' each place that term 
        appears and inserting ``July 1, 2005''; and
            (2) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``June 30, 2003'' and inserting 
                ``December 31, 2003''; and
                    (B) by striking ``July 1, 2003'' and inserting 
                ``January 1, 2004''.

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) are 
deemed to have taken effect on <<NOTE: 11 USC 1201 note.>> January 1, 
2004.

    Approved October 25, 2004.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 2864:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):
            Oct. 6, considered and passed Senate.
            Oct. 8, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
Title: Borehole velocity measurements and geological conditions at thirteen sites in the

Los Angeles, California region

Author(s): Gibbs, J.F., Tinsley, J.C., Boore, D.M., and Joyner, W.B.

Publishing Organization: U.S. Geological Survey

Publication Series and Number: Open-File Report OF-2000-470

Publication Date: 2000

Map Scale: 1:24,000

Cross Section: None

Northernmost Latitude: 34°25' 1"N (34.4170)

Southernmost Latitude: 33°46'59"N (33.7830)

Easternmost Longitude: 117°15' 0"W (-117.2500)

Westernmost Longitude: 118°45' 0"W (-118.7500)

Publication Format: Digital and Paper

Online:

 View the publication from the USGS Publications Warehouse

This Product Is Available, Please note the

publication series and number, and then

contact: U.S. Geological Survey

Postal Address:

USGS Information Services

Box 25286

Denver, CO 80225

Voice Telephone: (303) 202-4700 or 1-888-ASK-USGS

Facsimile Telephone: (303) 202-4693

If any fields in this record

contain errors, please send us

your

Has this record

been

U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA, USA

URL http://ngmdb.usgs.gov/ngmdb/ngm_catalog.ora.html

Database project personnel.

Last modified: 7-Nov-2011

Product Description Page http://ngmdb.usgs.gov/Prodesc/proddesc_34791.htm

1 of 1 11/7/2011 4:17 PM
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 4:02cr65-RH/WCS

4:08cv78-RH/WCS

TRENTON DENORM GREEN,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

ORDER DENYING § 2255 MOTION

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation (document 120). No objections have been filed. Upon

consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is ACCEPTED and adopted as the court’s

opinion. The clerk must enter judgment stating, “The defendant’s motion for relief

under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE.” The clerk must close

the file.

SO ORDERED on May 19, 2009.

s/Robert L. Hinkle 

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:02-cr-00065-RH-CAS Document 121 Filed 05/19/09 Page 1 of 1
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 23, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-40668

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE ALFREDO ALDANA-SANABRIA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:04-CR-846

--------------------

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Alfredo Aldana-Sanabria appeals his sentence under 

8 U.S.C. § 1326 for illegal re-entry into the United States after

having been deported. First, Aldana-Sanabria asserts that the

district court erred in concluding that his prior state felony

conviction for simple possession of a controlled substance was an

“aggravated felony” for purposes of § 1326(b). Our precedent

holds that a state felony conviction for simple drug possession

is properly considered an aggravated felony for purposes of 
No. 05-40668

-2-

§ 1326(b). See United States v. Rivera, 265 F.3d 310, 312-13

(5th Cir. 2001); United States v. Hinojosa-Lopez, 130 F.3d 691,

693-94 (5th Cir. 1997). Therefore, this issue is without merit,

and we affirm the judgment of the district court with respect to

it. 

Next, Aldana-Sanabria argues that the district court erred

in ordering, as a condition of supervised release, that he

cooperate with the probation officer in the collection of DNA.

His claim is not ripe for judicial review in light of our holding

in United States v. Riascos-Cuenu, 428 F.3d 1100, 1102 (5th Cir.

2005), petition for cert. filed (Jan. 9, 2006) (No. 05-8662). 

Accordingly, we dismiss this portion of the appeal for lack of

jurisdiction. 

 Last, Aldana-Sanabria argues that the “felony” and

“aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are

unconstitutional. His challenge is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). 

Although Aldana-Sanabria contends that Almendarez-Torres was

incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court

would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi v. New

Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such

arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. 

See United States v. Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.),

cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Aldana-Sanabria properly

concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of
No. 05-40668

-3-

Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to

preserve it for further review. Thus, we affirm the judgment of

the district court on this point. 

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED; APPEAL DISMISSED IN PART.
§ 3201.145 Surface guards, molding, and trim. ( a ) *Definition.* Surface guards, molding, and trim products are typically used during construction or manufacturing. These products are designed to protect surfaces, such as walls and floors, from damage or to cover the exposed edges of furniture or floors.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The Federal preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 26 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than July 6, 2020, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased surface guards, molding, and trim. By that date, Federal agencies responsible for drafting or reviewing specifications for products to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased surface guards, molding, and trim.
[84 FR 32021, July 5, 2019]
§ 2903.21 Applicable Federal statutes and regulations. Several Federal statutes and regulations apply to grant applications considered for review and to project grants awarded under this program. These include, but are not limited to: ( a ) 7 CFR part 1, subpart A—USDA implementation of the Freedom of Information Act.
( b ) 7 CFR part 3—USDA implementation of OMB Circular No. A-129 regarding debt collection.
( c ) 7 CFR part 15, subpart A—USDA implementation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended.
( d ) 2 CFR part 417, Nonprocurement Debarment and Suspension.
( e ) 2 CFR part 418, New Restrictions on Lobbying. Imposes prohibitions and requirements for disclosure and certification related to lobbying on recipients of Federal contracts, grants, cooperative agreements, and loans.
( f ) 2 CFR part 200, subparts B—General Provisions, C—Pre-Federal Award Requirements and Contents of Federal Awards, and D—Post-Federal Award Requirements, as adopted by USDA through 2 CFR part 400.
( g ) 2 CFR part 421, Requirements for Drug-Free Workplace (Financial Assistance).
( h ) 2 CFR part 200, subpart F—Audit Requirements, as adopted by USDA through 2 CFR part 400. Title 29 U.S.C. 794 (sec. 504, Rehabilitation Act of 1973) and 7 CFR part 15b (USDA implementation of statute)—prohibiting discrimination based upon physical or mental handicap in federally assisted programs. Title 35 U.S.C. 200 *et seq.*—Bayh-Dole Act, controlling allocation of rights to inventions made by employees of small business firms and domestic nonprofit organizations, including universities, in federally assisted programs (implementing regulations are contained in 37 CFR part 401).
[85 FR 31939, May 28, 2020]