U.S. flag
          An official website of the United States Government  Main navigation
  

        

              Data Initiatives
                              Regulations
                                                                        Row 1
                                              FAR FAR
                              Smart Matrix Smart Matrix
                              Chapter 99 (CAS) Chapter 99 (CAS)
                              Row 2
                                              DFARS DFARS
                              DFARSPGI DFARSPGI
                              AFARS AFARS
                              DAFFARS DAFFARS
                              DAFFARS MP DAFFARS MP
                              DARS DARS
                              DLAD DLAD
                              NMCARS NMCARS
                              Row 3
                                              SOFARS SOFARS
                              TRANSFARS TRANSFARS
                              AGAR AGAR
                              AIDAR AIDAR
                              CAR CAR
                              DEAR DEAR
                              DIAR DIAR
                              DOLAR DOLAR
                              Row 4
                                              DOSAR DOSAR
                              DTAR DTAR
                              EDAR EDAR
                              EPAAR EPAAR
                              FEHBAR FEHBAR
                              GSAM/R GSAM/R
                              HHSAR HHSAR
                              HSAR HSAR
                              Row 5
                                              HUDAR HUDAR
                              IAAR IAAR
                              JAR JAR
                              LIFAR LIFAR
                              NFS NFS
                              NRCAR NRCAR
                              TAR TAR
                              VAAR VAAR
                              Tools
                                                                        Archives
                              Smart Matrix
                              Regulations Search
                              Acquisition Regulation Comparator (ARC)
                              Policy Network
                                                                        CAOC
                              CAAC
                              FAR Council
                              ISDC
 Breadcrumb
        Home
                            Regulations
                            FAR
                            Subpart 15.1 - Source Selection Processes and Techniques
        
                  FAR
FAR
FAC Number: 2024-03 Effective Date: 02/23/2024
PartPart 1Part 2Part 3Part 4Part 5Part 6Part 7Part 8Part 9Part 10Part 11Part 12Part 13Part 14Part 15Part 16Part 17Part 18Part 19Part 20Part 21Part 22Part 23Part 24Part 25Part 26Part 27Part 28Part 29Part 30Part 31Part 32Part 33Part 34Part 35Part 36Part 37Part 38Part 39Part 40Part 41Part 42Part 43Part 44Part 45Part 46Part 47Part 48Part 49Part 50Part 51Part 52Part 53
Subpart15.015.115.215.315.415.515.6
Section15.10015.10115.102
Leave this field blank
        
                  

                                
                  
        « PreviousNext »
Subpart 15.1 - Source Selection Processes and TechniquesSubpart 15.1 - Source Selection Processes and Techniques    **Parent topic:**  Part 15 - Contracting by Negotiation15.100 Scope of subpart.       This subpart describes some of the acquisition processes and techniques that may be used to design competitive acquisition strategies suitable for the specific circumstances of the acquisition.15.101 Best value continuum.       An agency can obtain best value in negotiated acquisitions by using any one or a combination of source selection approaches. In different types of acquisitions, the relative importance of cost or price may vary. For example, in acquisitions where the requirement is clearly definable and the risk of unsuccessful contract performance is minimal, cost or price may play a dominant role in source selection. The less definitive the requirement, the more development work required, or the greater the performance risk, the more technical or past performance considerations may play a dominant role in source selection.    15.101-1 Tradeoff process.       (a)                    						            A tradeoff process is appropriate when it may be in the best interest of the Government to consider award to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror.                                          (b)                    						            When using a tradeoff process, the following apply:                                                         (1)                          								                All evaluation factors and significant subfactors that will affect contract award and their relative importance shall be clearly stated in the solicitation; and                                                            (2)                          								                The solicitation shall state whether all evaluation factors other than cost or price, when combined, are significantly more important than, approximately equal to, or significantly less important than cost or price.                                                                             (c)                    						            This process permits tradeoffs among cost or price and non-cost factors and allows the Government to accept other than the lowest priced proposal. The perceived benefits of the higher priced proposal shall merit the additional cost, and the rationale for tradeoffs must be documented in the file in accordance with  15.406.15.101-2 Lowest price technically acceptable source selection process.       (a) The lowest price technically acceptable source selection process is appropriate when best value is expected to result from selection of the technically acceptable proposal with the lowest evaluated price.                                          (b) When using the lowest price technically acceptable process, the following apply:                                                         (1) The evaluation factors and significant subfactors that establish the requirements of acceptability shall be set forth in the solicitation. Solicitations shall specify that award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated price of proposals meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-cost factors. If the contracting officer documents the file pursuant to  15.304(c)(3)(iii), past performance need not be an evaluation factor in lowest price technically acceptable source selections. If the contracting officer elects to consider past performance as an evaluation factor, it shall be evaluated in accordance with  15.305. However, the comparative assessment in  15.305(a)(2)(i) does not apply. If the contracting officer determines that a small business’ past performance is not acceptable, the matter shall be referred to the Small Business Administration for a Certificate of Competency determination, in accordance with the procedures contained in  subpart  19.6 and   15 U.S.C.637(b)(7)).                                                            (2) Tradeoffs are not permitted.                                                            (3) Proposals are evaluated for acceptability but not ranked using the non-cost/price factors.                                                            (4) Exchanges may occur (see  15.306).                                                                             (c)                   Except for DoD, in accordance with section 880 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Pub. L. 115-232, 41 U.S.C. 3701 Note), the lowest price technically acceptable source selection process shall only be used when—                                                         (1)                         The agency can comprehensively and clearly describe the minimum requirements in terms of performance objectives, measures, and standards that will be used to determine the acceptability of offers;                                                            (2)                         The agency would realize no, or minimal, value from a proposal that exceeds the minimum technical or performance requirements;                                                            (3)                         The agency believes the technical proposals will require no, or minimal, subjective judgment by the source selection authority as to the desirability of one offeror's proposal versus a competing proposal;                                                            (4)                         The agency has a high degree of confidence that reviewing the technical proposals of all offerors would not result in the identification of characteristics that could provide value or benefit to the agency;                                                            (5)                         The agency determined that the lowest price reflects the total cost, including operation and support, of the product(s) or service(s) being acquired; and                                                            (6)                         The contracting officer documents the contract file describing the circumstances that justify the use of the lowest price technically acceptable source selection process.                                                                             (d)                   Except for DoD, in accordance with section 880 of the John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Pub. L. 115-232, 41 U.S.C. 3701 Note), contracting officers shall avoid, to the maximum extent practicable, using the lowest price technically acceptable source selection process in the case of a procurement that is predominantly for the acquisition of—                                                         (1)                         Information technology services, cybersecurity services, systems engineering and technical assistance services, advanced electronic testing, audit or audit readiness services, health care services and records, telecommunications devices and services, or other knowledge-based professional services;                                                            (2)                         Personal protective equipment; or                                                            (3)                         Knowledge-based training or logistics services in contingency operations or other operations outside the United States, including in Afghanistan or Iraq.15.101-3 	Tiered evaluation of small business offers.       An agency shall not create a tiered (or "cascading") evaluation of offers, as described in   13 CFR 125.2, for multiple-award contracts unless an agency has statutory authority.15.102 Oral presentations.       (a)                    						            Oral presentations by offerors as requested by the Government may substitute for, or augment, written information. Use of oral presentations as a substitute for portions of a proposal can be effective in streamlining the source selection process. Oral presentations may occur at any time in the acquisition process, and are subject to the same restrictions as written information, regarding timing (see  15.208) and content (see  15.306). Oral presentations provide an opportunity for dialogue among the parties. Pre-recorded videotaped presentations that lack real-time interactive dialogue are not considered oral presentations for the purposes of this section, although they may be included in offeror submissions, when appropriate.                                          (b)                    						            The solicitation may require each offeror to submit part of its proposal through oral presentations. However, representations and certifications shall be submitted as required in the FAR provisions at  52.204-8(d) or  52.212-3(b), and a signed offer sheet (including any exceptions to the Government’s terms and conditions) shall be submitted in writing.                                          (c)                    						            Information pertaining to areas such as an offeror’s capability, past performance, work plans or approaches, staffing resources, transition plans, or sample tasks (or other types of tests) may be suitable for oral presentations. In deciding what information to obtain through an oral presentation, consider the following:                                                         (1)                          								                The Government’s ability to adequately evaluate the information;                                                            (2)                          								                The need to incorporate any information into the resultant contract;                                                            (3)                          								                The impact on the efficiency of the acquisition; and                                                            (4)                          								                The impact (including cost) on small businesses. In considering the costs of oral presentations, contracting officers should also consider alternatives to on-site oral presentations (*e.g.,* teleconferencing, video teleconferencing).                                                                             (d)                    						            When oral presentations are required, the solicitation shall provide offerors with sufficient information to prepare them. Accordingly, the solicitation may describe-                                                         (1)                          								                The types of information to be presented orally and the associated evaluation factors that will be used;                                                            (2)                          								                The qualifications for personnel that will be required to provide the oral presentation(s);                                                            (3)                          								                The requirements for, and any limitations and/or prohibitions on, the use of written material or other media to supplement the oral presentations;                                                            (4)                          								                The location, date, and time for the oral presentations;                                                            (5)                          								                The restrictions governing the time permitted for each oral presentation; and                                                            (6)                          								                The scope and content of exchanges that may occur between the Government’s participants and the offeror’s representatives as part of the oral presentations, including whether or not discussions (see  15.306(d)) will be permitted during oral presentations.                                                                             (e)                    						            The contracting officer shall maintain a record of oral presentations to document what the Government relied upon in making the source selection decision. The method and level of detail of the record (*e.g.,* videotaping, audio tape recording, written record, Government notes, copies of offeror briefing slides or presentation notes) shall be at the discretion of the source selection authority. A copy of the record placed in the file may be provided to the offeror.                                          (f)                    						            When an oral presentation includes information that the parties intend to include in the contract as material terms or conditions, the information shall be put in writing. Incorporation by reference of oral statements is not permitted.                                          (g)                    						            If, during an oral presentation, the Government conducts discussions (see  15.306(d)), the Government must comply with  15.306 and  15.307.
« PreviousNext »
FavoriteX

      Far Parts
            Regulations FAR Menu
  

        
      Index
                              List of Sections Affected
                              DOD Deviations
                              CAAC Deviations
                              1
                              2
                              3
                              4
                              5
                              6
                              7
                              8
                              9
                              10
                              11
                              12
                              13
                              14
                              15
                              16
                              17
                              18
                              19
                              20
                              21
                              22
                              23
                              24
                              25
                              26
                              27
                              28
                              29
                              30
                              31
                              32
                              33
                              34
                              35
                              36
                              37
                              38
                              39
                              40
                              41
                              42
                              43
                              44
                              45
                              46
                              47
                              48
                              49
                              50
                              51
                              52
                              53
                              Chapter 99 (CAS)Definitions
    Toggle
FAC Changes
    Toggle
Style Formatter
    Toggle

      ×
        Data Initiatives
                                                              Regulations
                                                              Tools
                                              Archives
                                                              Smart Matrix
                                                              Regulations Search
                                                              Acquisition Regulation Comparator (ARC)
                                                              Policy Network
                                              CAO.gov
                                                        CAO Home
                                                              Council Member
                                                                    Large Agencies
                                                              Small Agencies
                                                              Council Defining Documents
                                                                    CAOC History
                                                              CAOC Charter
                                                              Civilian Agency Acquisition Council (CAAC)
                                                              Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council
                                                              Interagency Suspension and Debarment Committee (ISDC)
                                                              Search
 ˄ Top Sign up for FAR News

                            Share the FAR
                        Upper Footer Menu
  

        
      Useful Links
                              FAR Resources
                              Training
                              Acquisition Systems
            
                            **Contact Us/FAQs**
                        **Privacy and Security Notice**
                        **Accessibility Aids**
                        **Last Updated 03/29/2024**
 ACQUISITION.GOV
                An official website of the General Services Administration About GSA
                Accessibility support
                FOIA requests
                No FEAR Act data
                Office of the Inspector General
                Performance reports
                Privacy policy Looking for U.S. government information and services?
            Visit USA.gov
 «
    
    Tt