alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23

Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm

The Board of
Directors and Shareholders
Trans World Entertainment Corporation:

We consent to
incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 33-14572,
33-40399, 33-51094, 33-51516, 33-59319, 333-75231, 333-81685, 333-101532, and
333-128210) on Form S-8 pertaining to the Trans World Music
Corp. 1986 Incentive and Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, the Trans World Music
Corp. 1990 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors, the Trans World
Entertainment Corp. 1994 Stock Option Plan, the Camelot Music Holdings, Inc.
1998 Stock Option Plan, the Camelot Music Holdings, Inc. Outside Directors
Stock Option Plan, the Trans World Entertainment Corp. 1998 Stock Option Plan,
the Trans World Entertainment Corp. 1999 Stock Option Plan, the Trans World
Entertainment Corporation 2002 Stock Option Plan, and the Trans World
Entertainment Corporation 2005 Long Term Incentive and Share Award Plan of our
reports dated April 19, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of
Trans World Entertainment Corporation and subsidiaries as of February 3, 2007,
and January 28, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations,
shareholders equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each
of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended February 3, 2007,
managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting as of February 3, 2007 and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as of February 3, 2007 which reports appear in the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Trans World Entertainment Corporation and subsidiaries
for the fiscal year ended February 3, 2007.

Our report on
the consolidated financial statements refers to changes in the methods of
accounting for share-based compensation and pension and other postretirement
benefit obligations in 2006.

/s/ KPMG LLP
Albany, New
York
April 19, 2007

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6264

MICHAEL T. BRAXTON,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN OF KERSHAW CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,

 Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Anderson. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior District Judge. (8:20-cv-03168-HMH)

Submitted: August 30, 2021 Decided: October 21, 2021

Before QUATTLEBAUM and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael T. Braxton, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael T. Braxton seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Braxton’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of 

appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue 

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this 

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the district court’s assessment 

of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 

(2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition 

states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 

134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Braxton has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Exhibit 10.2

LOGO

75 Sidney Street, 4thFloor

Cambridge, MA 02139

Phone: 617.299.5000

Fax: 617.995.4995

March 30,
2011

Lynda Chin, MD

89 Hyslop Road

Brookline, MA 02445



|Re: | Consulting Agreement by and between Lynda Chin, MD and AVEO Pharmaceuticals, Inc effective as of January 1, 2010 (the Consulting Agreement)
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dear Dr. Chin,

It is hereby agreed that Section 2 of the Consulting Agreement shall be amended, effective as of January 1, 2011, to extend the Consultation
Period through and including December 31, 2011 unless sooner terminated in accordance with Section 11 of the Consultant Agreement. All other terms and obligations under the Consulting Agreement shall remain the same.

Sincerely,

/s/ Murray O. Robinson

Murray O. Robinson, PhD

Senior Vice President,
Translational Research

Co-chair of the Scientific Advisory Board

Agreed and Acknowledged:

|              
|--------------
|              
|/s/ Lynda Chin
|Lynda Chin, MD



LOGO
2005 Management Incentive Plan










EXHIBIT
10-ii




Analysts
International Corporation




Summary
of 2005 Management Incentive Compensation Plan







The
following is a summary of the Company’s incentive compensation plan for fiscal
year 2005. Employees set forth below are eligible to receive the indicated
percentages of Gross Base Salary upon achieving certain pre-tax profit targets
of the Company. Certain non-executive employees’ incentive compensation will be
based on pre-tax profit and revenue growth targets set by the
Company.







	 	
      At
      90%

      of
      Target
	
      At
      100%

      of
      Target
	
      At
      120%

      of
      Target
	
      At
      200%

      of
      Target

	 	 	 	 	 
	
      CEO
	
      20%
	
      30%
	
      70%
	
      140%

	
      President
	
      20%
	
      30%
	
      60%
	
      120%

	
      Other
      Executives1
	
      20%
	
      30%
	
      50%
	
      100%

	
      General
      Managers
	
      10%
	
      20%
	
      40%
	
      80%










	 	
      At
      90%

      of
      Target
	
      At
      100%

      of
      Target
	
      At
      110%

      of
      Target
	
      At
      150%

      of
      Target

	 	 	 	 	 
	
      Area
      Managers
	
      10%
	
      20%
	
      40%
	
      80%







At any
point between the performance percentages presented above, the covered employees
may be eligible to receive a pro-rata payout. For example, at 95% of plan the
CEO would receive a 25% payout.




Payments
are subject to other eligibility requirements.
















1 
The term “Other Executives” refers to the Chief Operating Officer, General
Counsel, Chief Financial Officer/Treasurer, Senior Vice President of Business
Development/Strategy, and the Chief Information Officer.
98-1183.

#### State ex rel. Harden v. Wilkinson.

In Mandamus. On answer of respondent. Answer treated as motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
39–008 

108TH CONGRESS REPORT " HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ! 2d Session 108–784 

WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(a) OF RULE XIII 

WITH RESPECT TO THE SAME DAY CONSIDERATION OF 

CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED BY THE RULES 

COMMITTEE 

NOVEMBER 18, 2004.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mrs. MYRICK, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 861] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 861, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives clause 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring a twothirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is reported from 

the Rules Committee) against certain resolutions reported from the 

Rules Committee. The rule applies the waiver to any resolution reported on or before the legislative day of November 20, 2004, providing for consideration or disposition of a conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 4548) to authorize appropriations for fiscal 

year 2005 for intelligence and intelligence-related activities of the 

United States Government, the Community Management Account, 

and the Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability System, and for other purposes.

Æ
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Uwe Eberle, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Man-AHL 130, LLC
("registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

By:  /s/ Uwe Eberle


----------------------------------
Uwe Eberle
President
February 14, 2008


                                      E-2
Searched for **http://www.ssa.gov/pubs/10133.html**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://www.ssa.gov/pubs/10133.html**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
# C_2021049EN.01000301.xml

| 12.2.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 49/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 49/3

---

Commission declaration on compliance with international law

(2021/C 49/03)

When the Union brings a dispute under the Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) against another Member of the World Trade Organization (WTO), the Commission will make every reasonable effort to obtain, as early as possible, the agreement of that Member to resort to arbitration under Article 25 of the DSU as an interim appeal procedure, which preserves the essential features of appeals before the Appellate Body (the ‘appeal arbitration procedure’), as long as the Appellate Body is unable to fully resume its functions in accordance with Article 17 of the DSU.

When adopting implementing acts pursuant to Article 3(aa) of the Regulation, the Commission will act in accordance with the requirements of the international law on countermeasures, as codified in the Articles on the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts adopted by the International Law Commission.

In particular, before adopting implementing acts pursuant to Article 3(aa), the Commission will call upon the WTO Member concerned to implement the panel’s findings and recommendations, notify that WTO Member of the Union’s intention to take countermeasures and reiterate its openness to negotiate a mutually agreed solution in accordance with the requirements of the DSU.

When implementing acts have already been adopted pursuant to Article 3(aa), the Commission will suspend their application if the Appellate Body resumes its functions in respect to the case concerned in accordance with Article 17 of the DSU, or if an interim appeal procedure is initiated, provided that such procedure is pursued in good faith.

---
#### ROCKLAND LIGHT & POWER CO., Respondent, v. BUHLER et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 22, 1906.)

Action by the Rockland Light & Power Company against Max Buhler and others.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
EXHIBIT 23.b.


CONSENT OF REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


     We  hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in  the
Registration  Statements Nos. 333-76616, 333-65013  and  333-6103
each on  Form  S-8 and to Registration Statement No. 333-45218 on
Form  S-3, and in  the  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-KSB of Igene
Biotechnology, Inc. for the year ended December 31,  2003 of  our
report   dated   August 18, 2005, relating to  the   consolidated
financial  statements  of  Igene Biotechnology, Inc.

                                   /s/ STEGMAN & COMPANY
                                   ___________________________
                                       STEGMAN & COMPANY

Baltimore, Maryland
October 03, 2005
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-07-14T13:08:39-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
2006-0201.

#### State ex rel. Brown v. Court of Appeals, Tenth Appellate Dist.

In Mandamus. On relator’s motion for stay or preliminary injunction of court of appeals proceedings and respondent’s motion to dismiss. Motion for stay denied. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2611 Received in Senate (RDS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2611

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 17, 2013

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the headquarters building of the Coast Guard on the campus 
   located at 2701 Martin Luther King, Jr., Avenue Southeast in the 
District of Columbia as the ``Douglas A. Munro Coast Guard Headquarters 
                  Building'', and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The headquarters building of the Coast Guard on the campus located 
at 2701 Martin Luther King, Jr., Avenue Southeast in the District of 
Columbia shall be known and designated as the ``Douglas A. Munro Coast 
Guard Headquarters Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the building referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Douglas A. Munro Coast Guard 
Headquarters Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 16, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### St. Theresa’s Society, Group No. 20, Free Polish Women in the Land of Washington, appellee, v. Franciszka Kasperski et al., appellants.

Gen. No. 37,476.

Opinion filed November 5, 1934.

Rehearing denied November 19, 1934.

Thaddeus C. Toudor, for appellants; Alee E. Weinrob and Joseph Barbera, of counsel. Thomas E. Kluczynski, for appellee.

Mr. Justice MeSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.
39–008 

108TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 108–752 

WAIVING REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(a) OF RULE XIII WITH RESPECT TO 

THE SAME DAY CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED 

BY THE RULES COMMITTEE 

OCTOBER 7, (legislative day, OCTOBER 6), 2004.—Referred to the House Calendar 

and ordered to be printed 

Mr. REYNOLDS, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 828] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 828, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives clause 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring a twothirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is reported from 

the Rules Committee) against certain resolutions reported from the 

Rules Committee. The Rule applies the waiver to any special rule 

reported on the legislative day of Thursday, October 7, 2004, providing for consideration or disposition of a conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 4520) to amend the Internal Revenue Code 

of 1986 to remove impediments in such Code and make our manufacturing, service, and high-technology businesses and workers 

more competitive and productive both at home and abroad. 

Æ
§ 330.206 Packaging requirements. Shipments in which plant pests, biological control organisms, and associated articles are imported into, moved in interstate commerce, or transited through the United States must meet the general packaging requirements of this section, as well as all specific packaging requirements on the permit itself. ( a ) *Packaging requiremspents.* All shipments must consist of an outer shipping container and at least two packages within the container. Both the container and inner packages must be securely sealed to prevent the dissemination of the enclosed plant pests, biological control organisms, or associated articles. ( 1 ) *Outer shipping container.* The outer shipping container must be rigid, impenetrable and durable enough to remain closed and structurally intact in the event of dropping, lateral impact with other objects, and other shocks incidental to handling.
( 2 ) *Inner packages.* The innermost package or packages within the shipping container must contain all of the organisms or articles that will be moved. As a safeguard, the innermost package must be placed within another, larger package. All packages within the shipping container must be constructed or safeguarded so that they will remain sealed and structurally intact throughout transit. The packages must be able to withstand changes in pressure, temperature, and other climatic conditions incidental to shipment.
( b ) *Packing material.* Packing materials may be placed in the inner packages or shipping container for such purposes as cushioning, stabilizing, water absorption or retention, nourishment or substrate for regulated articles, etc. Packing material for importation must be free of plant pests, noxious weeds, biological control organisms not listed on the permit or associated articles, and, as such, must be new, or must have been sterilized or disinfected prior to reuse. Packing material must be suited for the enclosed organism or article, as well as any medium in which the organism or article will be maintained.
( c ) *Requirements following receipt of the shipment at the point of destination.* ( 1 ) Packing material, including media and substrates, must be destroyed by incineration, be decontaminated using autoclaving or another approved method, or otherwise be disposed of in a manner specified in the permit itself.
( 2 ) Shipping containers may be reused, provided that the container has not been contaminated with plant pests, noxious weeds, biological control organisms, or associated articles. Shipping containers that have been in contact with or otherwise contaminated with any of these items must be sufficiently sterilized or disinfected prior to reuse, or otherwise disposed of.
( d ) *Costs.* Permittees who fail to meet the requirements of this section may be held responsible for all costs incident to inspection, rerouting, repackaging, subsequent movement, and any treatments.