alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 29.129 National Advisory Committee for Inspection Services. ( a ) To assist the Secretary in determining the level of inspection and related services and the fees and charges therefore, a National Advisory Committee of tobacco producers shall be appointed in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. appendix I).
( b ) The committee shall consist of 14 members and 14 alternates. There will be a flue-cured subcommittee, a burley subcommittee, and a fire and dark air-cured subcommittee.
( c ) Recommendations to the Secretary for membership on the committee will be received from the following organizations: One from the Georgia Farm Bureau, one from the South Carolina Farm Bureau, one from the Virginia Farm Bureau, three from the North Carolina Farm Bureau, two from the North Carolina Grange, one from the Tennessee Farm Bureau, three from the Kentucky Farm Bureau, one from the Florida, Indiana, Missouri, West Virginia, or Maryland Farm Bureau, and one from the Wisconsin or Ohio Farm Bureau.
( d ) The committee and/or subcommittees shall meet at the call of the Secretary.
[46 FR 62394, Dec. 24, 1981]
#### § 3100.42 Definitions.

All definitions are those which appear in 36 CFR part 800. In addition, the following apply in this rule:

*Cultural resources (heritage resources)* are the remains or records of districts, sites, structures, buildings, networks, neighborhoods, objects, and events from the past. They may be historic, prehistoric, archeological, or architectural in nature. Cultural resources are an irreplaceable and nonrenewable aspect of our national heritage.

*Cultural environment* is that portion of the environment which includes reminders of the rich historic and prehistoric past of our nation.
Devany, Dennis (OST) 

From: charles mitchell [cwmjvm@gmail.com] , •"Saturday, February 13, 2010 1:58 PM 

To:·' ,',: / 

'. .Sent:~· ,. , Devany, Dennis (OST) 


Subject: Colgan Air 


I c.all.youratt~ti.o.1;} to the excellent article in this morning's Plattsburgh Press Republican regarding .the county's 


recommeridailon:iib award air service to Colgan Air. 


I completely agree with his remarks and in addition I would like to add that Colgan Air's safety record is questionable 


at best. They have been held accountable for the deaths in the horrific plane crash outside Buffalo, a year ago. 


Our county legislators are greedy and listening to the greedier Chamber of Commerce and I doubt if the voting 


public is well informed about what is going to be "rammed down their throats." 


So please act responsibly and turn down their recommendation to save the pwople of Clinton County from a 


judgement based on faultY information. ' 


Thank you, 


1
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2443 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2443

     To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt certain 
  educational institutions from the employer health insurance mandate.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 19, 2013

   Mr. Messer (for himself, Mr. Rokita, and Mrs. Brooks of Indiana) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt certain 
  educational institutions from the employer health insurance mandate.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safeguarding Children Harmed by 
Obamacare's Onerous Levies Act''.

SEC. 2. CERTAIN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS EXEMPT FROM EMPLOYER HEALTH 
              INSURANCE MANDATE.

    (a) In General.--Section 4980H(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(F) Exception for certain educational 
                institutions.--The term `applicable large employer' 
                shall not include--
                            ``(i) any elementary school or secondary 
                        school (as such terms are defined in section 
                        9101 of the Elementary and Secondary Education 
                        Act of 1965),
                            ``(ii) any for-profit school which would be 
                        such an elementary school or secondary school 
                        if such school were a nonprofit school,
                            ``(iii) any local educational agency or 
                        State educational agency (as such terms are 
                        defined in section 9101 of such Act), and
                            ``(iv) any institution of higher education 
                        (as such term is defined in section 102 of the 
                        Higher Education Act of 1965, except that such 
                        term does not include institutions described in 
                        subsection (a)(1)(C) of such section 102).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to months beginning after December 31, 2013.
                                 <all>
```
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

38 40 42



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 1000 1500 2000 1000 18 12 06 00 07/17 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 17 Jul 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL
Directors Compensation



 Exhibit 10.20 
  
 Director Compensation 
  
 U.S. Concrete, Inc. (the “Company”) pays to each nonemployee member of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) the following in consideration for their
services as members of the Board and its committees: 
  

	 	•	 	an annual retainer of $10,000; 

  

	 	•	 	$5,000 for each Board meeting attended in person and $2,500 for each Board meeting attended telephonically; 

  

	 	•	 	$5,000 for each audit committee meeting attended by the chairperson of the audit committee, whether attended in person or telephonically and whether or not the meeting is held on
the same day as a Board meeting; 

  

	 	•	 	$4,000 for each audit committee meeting attended by each other member of the audit committee, whether attended in person or telephonically and whether or not the meeting is held on
the same day as a Board meeting; and 

  

	 	•	 	$1,000 for each other Board committee meeting attended in person and $500 for each such other Board committee meeting attended telephonically, unless the committee meeting is held
on the same day as a Board meeting, in which case the committee member receives no fee for attending that committee meeting. 

  
 The Company also annually grants each of its nonemployee directors an option to purchase 10,000 shares of common stock under its 1999 Incentive Plan. The Company does not
pay any additional compensation to its employees for serving as directors, but reimburses all directors for out-of-pocket expenses they incur in connection with attending Board and Board committee meetings or otherwise in their capacity as
directors.
#### The State ex rel. Wilcox, Appellant, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Wilcox v. Indus. Comm.*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 146.]

(No. 96-2809

Submitted July 8, 1998

Decided September 16, 1998.)

*Law Offices of Larry Hotchkiss*and *Scott A. Bravi,*for appellant.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *C. Bradley Howenstein,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission.

*Janet E. Jackson,*City Attorney, and *Stephanie Mitchell Hughes,*Assistant City Attorney, for appellee City of Columbus.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BlackRock Capital Investment Corporation (the
Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Michael J. Zugay, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael Pungello,
as Interim Chief Financial Officer and Interim Treasurer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and consolidated
results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                                                      
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael J. Zugay
|Name:                |  | Michael J. Zugay                                     
|Title:               |  | Chief Executive Officer                              
|Date:                |  | November 8, 2017                                     
|                    
|/s/ Michael Pungello
|Name:                |  | Michael Pungello                                     
|Title:               |  | Interim Chief Financial Officer and Interim Treasurer
|Date:                |  | November 8, 2017
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:99cr22 LAC

DERRICK STEWART

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on March 4, 2009 

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR

REDUCTION OF HIS SENTENCE, PURSUANT TO §3582(c)(2) (Doc. #102) 

Filed by DEFENDANT PRO SE on2/23/09 Doc.# 110

RESPONSES:

IN OPPOSITION BY GOVERNMENT on3/4/09 Doc.# 111

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Mary Maloy

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 5th day of

March, 2009, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) 

 s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 3:99-cr-00022-LC-MD Document 112 Filed 03/05/09 Page 1 of 1
Second Department,

June, 1980

(June 19, 1980) 

#### In the Matter of James J. Hammarth, Petitioner. Frederick Hunziker et al., Respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to section 36 of the Public Officers Law to remove various named officials of the City of Rye from office. Respondents cross-move to dismiss the petition. Cross motions granted, and petition dismissed, with prejudice, and with one bill of $50 costs and disbursements payable to respondents appearing separately and filing separate papers. This court has no jurisdiction over the instant proceeding. Section 36 of the Public Officers Law only applies to officers of any "town, village, improvement district or fire district”. By its terms, it does not apply to city officials (see *Blaikie v Lindsay,*66 Misc 2d 668, 670). Even if we were not dismissing on that ground, the petition must be dismissed for failure to state a cause of action. For the most part, the voluminous petition makes vague, generalized and unfounded claims. We note that two of the bases for petitioner’s claims, viz., the re-appraisal of his property and his conviction for violation of the Rye Sanitary Code, were in all respects proper. Petitioner fully renovated his home, thereby affording a basis for the large increase in its assessment. Petitioner twice filed grievances with the board of assessment review and was denied relief, but each time did not appeal any further. Concerning the conviction for violation of the sanitary code, said determination was upheld on appeal by the Appellate Term for the Ninth and Tenth Judicial Districts *(People v Hammarth,*NYU, April 24, 1979, p 11, col 3, mot for lv to app den 47 NY2d 1017). The foregoing would seem to indicate that the petitioner has been guilty of some wrongdoing himself, rather than the Rye officials upon whom he seeks to cast blame. Accordingly, the petition should be dismissed with prejudice to the bringing of any future actions by the petitioner against the respondents based upon the grounds alleged in the petition. Gibbons, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
#### § 28.471 Below Leaf Grade Cotton.

Below leaf grade cotton is American Upland cotton which is lower in leaf grade than Leaf Grade 7. In cotton classification, the official designation for such cotton is Below Leaf Grade. Other additional explanatory terms considered necessary to describe adequately the condition of the cotton may be entered on classification memorandums or certificates.

[57 FR 34499, Aug. 5, 1992]
PUBLIC LAW 108–381—OCT. 30, 2004 118 STAT. 2211

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3217:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:

Vol. 149 (2003): Nov. 17, considered and passed House.

Vol. 150 (2004): Oct. 11, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 108–381

108th Congress

An Act

To provide for the conveyance of several small parcels of National Forest System

land in the Apalachicola National Forest, Florida, to resolve boundary discrepancies involving the Mt. Trial Primitive Baptist Church of Wakulla County,

Florida, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAND CONVEYANCE, APALACHICOLA NATIONAL FOREST,

FLORIDA.

(a) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of Agriculture

may convey, without consideration, to the Mt. Trial Primitive Baptist Church of Wakulla County, Florida, all right, title, and interest

of the United States in and to four parcels of real property in

the Apalachicola National Forest, Florida, located in section 5 of

township 5 south, range 2 west, Tallahassee meridian, and consisting of approximately 9.95 acres, 0.09 acres, 0.09 acres, and

0.096 acres, respectively, as depicted on a map, plat number 5–

118, prepared as part of a 1983 Forest Service survey.

(b) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.—The exact acreage and legal

description of the real property to be conveyed under subsection

(a) shall be determined by the Secretary.

SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

The Secretary may require such additional terms and conditions

in connection with the conveyance under section 1 as the Secretary

considers appropriate to protect the interests of the United States.

Approved October 30, 2004.

Oct. 30, 2004

[H.R. 3217]
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 222 (Thursday, November 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70704-70705]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29139]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LIBRARY OF CONGRESS

Copyright Office

[Docket No. 2010-4]


Federal Copyright Protection of Sound Recordings Fixed Before 
February 15, 1972

AGENCY: Copyright Office, Library of Congress.

ACTION: Notice of inquiry; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    This document corrects the reply comment date contained in the 
notice of inquiry published Wednesday, November 3, 2010 (75 FR 67777). 
The correct reply comment date is January 19, 2011.


[[Page 70705]]


    Dated: November 15, 2010.
David O. Carson,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010-29139 Filed 11-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
CERTIFICATION

I, Timothy E. Vance, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Data Call Technologies,Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

4. The  issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as 4efined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or causedsuch internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer's internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the  issuer's most recent fiscalquarter (the  issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer'sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5. The  issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the  issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the  issuer's board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the  issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether r not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the  issuer's internal control overfinancial reporting.

Date: May 12, 2011

/s/ Timothy E. VanceCEO
#### § 301.55-1 Definitions.

*Administrator.* The Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, or any person authorized to act for the Administrator.

*Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS).* The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service of the United States Department of Agriculture.

*Cactus plants.* Any of various fleshy-stemmed plants of the botanical family Cactaceae.

*Certificate.* A document in which an inspector or person operating under a compliance agreement affirms that a specified regulated article is free of South American cactus moth and may be moved interstate to any destination.

*Compliance agreement.* A written agreement between APHIS and a person engaged in growing, handling, or moving regulated articles, wherein the person agrees to comply with this subpart.

*Departmental permit.* A document issued by the Administrator in which he or she affirms that interstate movement of the regulated article identified on the document is for scientific or experimental purposes and that the regulated article is eligible for interstate movement in accordance with § 301.55-4(c).

*Infestation.* The presence of the South American cactus moth or the existence of circumstances that makes it reasonable to believe that the South American cactus moth may be present.

*Inspector.* Any employee of APHIS or other person authorized by the Administrator to perform the duties required under this subpart.

*Interstate.* From any State into or through any other State.

*Limited permit.* A document in which an inspector or person operating under a compliance agreement affirms that the regulated article identified on the document is eligible for interstate movement in accordance with § 301.55-5(b) only to a specified destination and only in accordance with specified conditions.

*Moved (move, movement).* Shipped, offered for shipment, received for transportation, transported, carried, or allowed to be moved, shipped, transported, or carried.

*Person.* Any association, company, corporation, firm, individual, joint stock company, partnership, society, or other entity.

*Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ).* The Plant Protection and Quarantine program of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, United States Department of Agriculture.

*Quarantined area.* Any State, or any portion of a State, listed in accordance with § 301.55-3(a) or otherwise designated as a quarantined area in accordance with § 301.55-3(b).

*Regulated article.* Any article identified as a regulated article under § 301.55-2 as follows: listed as of January 30, 2023, added in accordance with § 301.55-2(b), or otherwise designated in accordance with § 301.55-2(c).

*South American cactus moth.* The live insect known as the South American cactus moth, *Cactoblastis cactorum,* in any life stage (egg, larva, pupa, adult).

*State.* The District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Northern Mariana Islands, or any State, territory, or possession of the United States.

[74 FR 27073, June 8, 2009, as amended at 87 FR 80007, Dec. 29, 2022]
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 227 (Friday, November 26, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 72835]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29535]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5375-N-46]


Federal Property Suitable as Facilities To Assist the Homeless

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible 
use to assist the homeless.

DATES: Effective Date: November 26, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy Ezzell, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 7262, Washington, 
DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and 
speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-
free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 800-927-7588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the December 12, 1988 
court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans 
Administration, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a 
weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus 
Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for 
suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the 
purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been 
determined suitable or unsuitable this week.

    Dated: November 18, 2010.
Mark R. Johnston,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.
[FR Doc. 2010-29535 Filed 11-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P