alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           7,280
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     25,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,780
<PP&E>                                          22,331
<DEPRECIATION>                                  19,287
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  62,824
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          924,724
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,500
<COMMON>                                       249,730
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,114,130)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    62,824
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               200,114
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             224,302
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (424,416)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (424,416)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 15,216
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (409,200)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.008)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.008)


</TABLE>
Amendment #1 to Investment Services Agreement


 Exhibit 10.08 
  
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 
  
 TO 
  
 INVESTMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT 
  
 WHEREAS, MBIA Insurance Corp. of Illinois and MBIA Capital Management Corp. (formerly MBIA Securities Corp.), have entered into an Investment Services Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated January 2, 1996, and

  
 WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to amend said Agreement;

  
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Agreement is hereby amended as follows,
effective January 1, 2003: 
  
 1. Section 8 has been replaced in
its entirety with the following: 
  
 “8. Compensation of
Advisor. The compensation of Advisor for its services under this Agreement shall be calculated and paid in accordance with the Schedule of Fees attached hereto as Exhibit C and incorporated herein by reference. It is intended by the parties
hereto that the compensation rate set forth in the Schedule of Fees, or any subsequent amendment thereto, shall reflect Advisor’s costs in providing services to Client, pursuant to this Agreement. The Schedule of Fees will be reviewed annually
and adjusted to reflect any changes in the Advisor’s costs.” 
  
 2. Section 10 has been amended to include the following sentence, as underlined below: 
  
 “10. Records. Advisor shall maintain accurate and detailed records of all transactions in connection with the Account, which shall be subject
to inspection by Client upon reasonable notice during Advisor’s regular business hours. Such records and documents of the Advisor as pertaining to this Agreement shall be made available to the Director of Insurance or any applicable
regulatory agency upon request. It is understood and acknowledged that such records are the property of the Company and shall be returned to the Company upon termination of this Agreement. On request, representatives of Advisor shall meet with
the Client’s officers and directors and the officers and directors of the Client’s parent company to discuss investment performance and other matters relating to Advisor’s obligations under this Agreement.” 
  
 3. Exhibit C attached hereto is to be added to the Agreement. 
  
 4. All other provisions of the Agreement shall remain the same. 






 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused the signatures of their duly authorized officers to be hereto
affixed this 2nd day of January, 2003. 
  

							
	 MBIA INSURANCE CORP. OF
 ILLINOIS
	    	MBIA CAPITAL MANAGEMENT CORP.
				
	By:	 	 /s/ Richard L. Weill

	    	By:	 	 /s/ Clifford D. Corso


	 	 	 Name: Richard L. Weill
 Title:  
President
	    	 	 	 Name: Clifford D. Corso
 Title:  
President








 EXHIBIT C 
 Schedule of Fees 
  

			
	 Assets Under Management
 at Market Value ($ millions)

	 	 Management Fees Per Annum
 in Basis Points Times Assets
 under Management


	 All Assets
	 	11.0 bp

  
 Management fees shall be paid monthly,
in arrears, based upon the average market value of the assets under management during such quarter. 
  
 “Market Value” shall be determined in accordance with Section 9 of this Agreement.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of Southern Trust Securities Holding Corp., Inc. (the Corporation) each certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that the Corporations Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and the information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



|                  |     |                        
|----------------- | --- | -----------------------
|                  | By: | /s/ ROBERT ESCOBIO     
|                  |     | Robert Escobio         
|                  |     | Chief Executive Officer
|November 18, 2008 |     |                        
|                  |     |                        
|                  | By: | /s/ FERNANDO FUSSA     
|                  |     | Fernando Fussa         
|                  |     | Chief Financial Officer
|November 18, 2008 |     |                        



This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document, and may not be disclosed, distributed or used by any person for any reason other than as specifically required by law.
39–008

108TH CONGRESS REPORT " HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ! 2d Session 108–781

WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE 

REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 1350, INDIVIDUALS WITH 

DISABILITIES EDUCATION IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 2004

NOVEMBER 18, 2004.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. SESSIONS, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 858] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 858, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives all points of order against the conference 

report to accompany H.R. 1350, Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, and against its consideration. Finally, the rule provides that the conference report shall be considered as read.

Æ
#### § 29.1121 Rule 15.

Any lot of tobacco containing 20 percent or more of variegated tobacco other than variegated red or scorched shall be described as variegated and designated by the color symbol “K,” “KL,” “KF,” “KD,” or “KV.”

[42 FR 21092, Apr. 25, 1977, as amended at 48 FR 29671, June 28, 1983]
§ 3300.19 Application for approval. An application by an officer of the organization shall be submitted to the Administrator for each facility for which approval is sought. Copies of the Form, Application for Approval as a U.S. ATP Testing Station, may be obtained by a request to the ATP manager. The following information must be supplied in the application: ( a ) A statement that the organization is incorporated or chartered under the laws of, and that it has its principal office in, the United States, including the name, address, and telephone number of the principal office.
( b ) The address and telephone number of the testing station, and name and title of person in charge of the station.
( c ) A summary of experience at the facility which would indicate the capability to conduct tests of equipment according to Subpart B of this rule.
( d ) A general description of the station, including drawings on letter size (81 ⁄ 2 × 11 inches) paper to show the floor plan and cross-sections of the test chamber, basic dimensions, location of heat exchangers and instruments, and any other pertinent information.
( e ) An indication of which of the following types of equipment, as defined in ATP, Annex 1, that the station is capable of testing: intermodal freight containers, semi-trailers, trailers, railcars, and trucks.
( f ) A statement that the ATP manager or other representative of the Administrator may, before a decision is made concerning the application, observe a test at the station of a Class “C” mechanically refrigerated container or semi-trailer, with Class “C” being defined as in ATP, Annex 1, paragraph 3.
( g ) A statement that the station will be open to public use, that is, to manufacturers and owners of equipment which may apply to have equipment tested.
( h ) A statement that the fees to be charged by the organization for testing will be reasonable with respect to costs involved, and that such fees will be payable directly to the organization by those who seek testing of their equipment.
( i ) A statement that the station will maintain records of basic data developed in each test conducted under this rule, such records to be available for review by the ATP manager or other representative of the Administrator upon request. The record for each test shall be maintained for a period of three years.
( j ) A statement that the organization will advise the ATP manager as soon as practicable of its intent to conduct a test under this rule and that it will, as soon as possible, advise when a firm test date has been set so that the ATP manager or other representative of the Administrator may observe the test.
( k ) A statement that the organization will send to the ATP manager a copy of each test report for equipment tested at the station according to this rule, within 30 days after completion of the test.
( l ) A statement that, should any significant change occur in the facility with respect to structure or test equipment as a result of redesign or other cause during the period of approval, the organization will so advise the ATP manager within 30 days after such change.
( m ) Any other pertinent information.
#### Childers, Appellant, *v.*Wingard, Warden, Appellee.

[Cite as *Childers v. Wingard*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 427.]

(No. 98-1405

Submitted September 29, 1998

Decided October 28, 1998.)

*428
      *Thomas J. Childers, pro se.*

*Per Curiam.*

Childers asserts that the court of appeals erred in dismissing his petition. For the following reasons, however, the court of appeals properly-dismissed the habeas corpus petition.

First, Childers has or had adequate remedies at law by appeal or postconviction relief to review the alleged sentencing error. *State ex rel. Massie v. Rogers*(1997), 77 Ohio St.3d 449, 450, 674 N.E.2d 1383, 1383. Sentencing errors are not jurisdictional and are not cognizable in habeas corpus. *Majoros v. Collins*(1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 442, 443, 596 N.E.2d 1038, 1039.

Second, Childers has already raised an analogous claim of sentencing error in his direct appeal. Where a plain and adequate remedy at law has been unsuccessfully invoked, extraordinary relief is not available to relitigate the same issue. See *State ex rel. Sampson v. Parrott*(1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 92, 93, 694 N.E.2d 463.

Finally, *res judicata*barred Childers from filing successive habeas corpus petitions. *State ex rel. Brantley v. Ghee*(1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 287, 288, 685 N.E.2d 1243, 1244. Childers’s previous habeas corpus petition had been dismissed by the court of appeals. See *VanBuskirk v. Wingard*(1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 659, 687 N.E.2d 776, where we affirmed the dismissal of Childers’s petition.

Based on the foregoing, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
#### § 201.65 Noxious-weed seeds in interstate commerce.

Tolerances for rates of occurrence of noxious-weed seeds shall be recognized and shall be applied to the number of noxious-weed seeds found by analysis in the quantity of seed specified for noxious-weed seed determinations in § 201.46, except as provided in § 201.16(b). Rates per pound or ounce must be converted to the equivalent number of seeds found in § 201.46, Table 1, Minimum weight for noxious-weed seed examination (grams). Some tolerances are listed in the following table. The number found as represented by the label or test (Column X) will be considered within tolerance if not more than the corresponding numbers in Column Y are found by analysis in the administration of the Act. For numbers of seed greater than those in the table, a tolerance based on a degree of certainty of 5 percent (P = 0.05) can be calculated by the formula, Y = X + 1.65√X + 0.03, where X is the number of seeds represented by the label or test and Y is the maximum number within tolerance.

| Number represented by label or test | Maximum number within tolerances | Number represented by label or test | Maximum number within tolerances | Number represented by label or test | Maximum number within tolerances |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| (X) | (Y) | (X) | (Y) | (X) | (Y) |
| 0 | 2 | 34 | 43 | 68 | 81 |
| 1 | 2 | 35 | 44 | 69 | 82 |
| 2 | 4 | 36 | 45 | 70 | 83 |
| 3 | 5 | 37 | 46 | 71 | 84 |
| 4 | 7 | 38 | 47 | 72 | 85 |
| 5 | 8 | 39 | 49 | 73 | 86 |
| 6 | 9 | 40 | 50 | 74 | 87 |
| 7 | 11 | 41 | 51 | 75 | 89 |
| 8 | 12 | 42 | 52 | 76 | 90 |
| 9 | 13 | 43 | 53 | 77 | 91 |
| 10 | 14 | 44 | 54 | 78 | 92 |
| 11 | 16 | 45 | 55 | 79 | 93 |
| 12 | 17 | 46 | 56 | 80 | 94 |
| 13 | 18 | 47 | 58 | 81 | 95 |
| 14 | 19 | 48 | 59 | 82 | 96 |
| 15 | 21 | 49 | 60 | 83 | 97 |
| 16 | 22 | 50 | 61 | 84 | 98 |
| 17 | 23 | 51 | 62 | 85 | 99 |
| 18 | 24 | 52 | 63 | 86 | 101 |
| 19 | 25 | 53 | 64 | 87 | 102 |
| 20 | 27 | 54 | 65 | 88 | 103 |
| 21 | 28 | 55 | 67 | 89 | 104 |
| 22 | 29 | 56 | 68 | 90 | 105 |
| 23 | 30 | 57 | 69 | 91 | 106 |
| 24 | 31 | 58 | 70 | 92 | 107 |
| 25 | 32 | 59 | 71 | 93 | 108 |
| 26 | 34 | 60 | 72 | 94 | 109 |
| 27 | 35 | 61 | 73 | 95 | 110 |
| 28 | 36 | 62 | 74 | 96 | 111 |
| 29 | 37 | 63 | 75 | 97 | 112 |
| 30 | 38 | 64 | 76 | 98 | 114 |
| 31 | 39 | 65 | 78 | 99 | 115 |
| 32 | 41 | 66 | 79 | 100 | 116 |
| 33 | 42 | 67 | 80 | | |

[76 FR 31794, June 2, 2011]
ARiZONA DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 1110 West Washington Street• Phoenix, Arizona 85007 (602) 771-2300 www.azdeq.gov

Henry R. Darwin Director October 1,2013 Deborah Jordan, Air Division Director U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region

9 Air-i 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Subject: ADEQ Request for Relocation
of the Payson Well Monitor on the Same Site Dear Ms. Jordan: The Arizona Department
of Environmental Quality (ADEQ)

is submitting the Arizona Air Monitoring Network Plan for the Year 2013. There
is one site that does not meet the requirement for unrestricted airflow as specified
in 40 CFR Part 58 Appendix
E. This letter is to request EPA approve for the relocation of the Payson Well monitor placement

to another location on the same property. Below
is information that ADEQ has considered

in the determination that the new monitoring site would better meet the required siting criteria. The Payson Well site was established

in 1991, and currently monitors PM 10 and meteorological wind, temperature, and relative humidity. There have been several structural changes
at the Payson Well site that are limiting airflow around the PM 10 monitor. These include construction of new buildings and growth of trees. ADEQ met with the site manager
to determine

a more suitable location. ADEQ
is requesting approval by EPA Region

9 for the relocation of the current PM 10 monitoring location (lat: 34.2294; long: -111.3297)

to a parcel 90 meters to the east at location (lat: 34.2296; long: -111.3295). The PM 10 monitoring will remain on the same property while better meeting the required siting criteria. The AQS Site ID and Site Name will remain the same. Please see Figure

1 and Figure

2 below for aerial photographs
of the site relocation schematic. We appreciate the effort by EPA in the review of this request for relocation of the Payson Well site monitor
to better meet siting requirements and provide unrestricted
air flow. If you have any questions, please contact Theresa Rigney at (602) 771-2274. Sincerely, nc C.)ey, Director Air 7 fality Division Janice K. Brewer Governorcc: Meredith Kurpius, USEPA, Region

9 Michael Flagg, USEPA, Region

9 Theresa Rigney, ADEQ

Page
2 of 2 r rc3—Ad

I 1 Aerial photograph
of current PM 10 monitor location
at Payson Well Site..-j-——

tS 

# : (i

L

:a -I* Figure 3.3-2 Google Earth Image of the proposed PM 10 monitor location at Payson Well Site- I F 

# IL—-.S. 

# F, L

: If!

I ea.4- IC’:‘.4.rrVa I Ia.
§ 301.75-9 Interstate movement of regulated articles from a quarantined area for experimental or scientific purposes. A regulated article may be moved interstate from a quarantined area if: ( a ) Moved by the United States Department of Agriculture for experimental or scientific purposes;
( b ) Moved pursuant to a Departmental permit issued for such article by the Administrator;
( c ) Moved in accordance with conditions specified on the Departmental permit and determined by the Administrator to be adequate to prevent the spread of citrus canker, i.e., conditions of treatment, processing, growing, shipment, disposal; and
( d ) Moved with a Departmental tag or label securely attached to the outside of the container containing the article or securely attached to the article itself if not in a container, with such tag or label bearing a Departmental permit number corresponding to the number of the Departmental permit issued for such article.
[50 FR 51231, Dec. 13, 1985. Redesignated and amended at 55 FR 37450, Sept. 11, 1990]
#### § 29.2273 Grademark.

A grademark normally consists of three symbols which indicate group, quality, and color. A letter is used to indicate group, a number to indicate quality, and a letter or letters to indicate color. For example, B3D means Heavy Leaf, good quality, and dark-brown color.
§ 3201.132 Folders and filing products. ( a ) *Definition.* Folders and filing products are products that are designed to hold together items such as loose sheets of paper, documents, and photographs with clasps, fasteners, rings, or folders. This category includes binders, folders, and document covers.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The Federal preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 56 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than July 6, 2020, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased folders and filing products. By that date, Federal agencies responsible for drafting or reviewing specifications for products to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased folders and filing products.
( d ) *Determining overlap with a designated product category in the EPA's CPG program.* Qualifying products within this product category may overlap with the EPA's CPG-designated recovered content product categories of Non-Paper Office Products: Binders, Clipboards, File Folders, Clip Portfolios, and Presentation Folders and Non-Paper Office Products: Plastic Envelopes. USDA is requesting that manufacturers of these qualifying biobased products provide information on the BioPreferred Program's website about the intended uses of the product, information on whether the product contains any recovered material, in addition to biobased ingredients, and performance standards against which the product has been tested. This information will assist Federal agencies in determining whether a qualifying biobased product overlaps with the EPA's CPG-designated product categories of Non-Paper Office Products: Binders, Clipboards, File Folders, Clip Portfolios, and Presentation Folders and Non-Paper Office Products: Plastic Envelopes and which product should be afforded the preference in purchasing.
Note 1 to Paragraph ( d
):
Biobased folders and filing products within this designated product category can compete with similar folders and filing products with recycled content. Under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, section 6002, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency CPG-designated Non-Paper Office Products: Binders, Clipboards, File Folders, Clip Portfolios, and Presentation Folders and Non-Paper Office Products: Plastic Envelopes containing recovered materials as products for which Federal agencies must give preference in their purchasing programs. The designation can be found in the Comprehensive Procurement Guideline, 40 CFR 247.16.
[84 FR 32021, July 5, 2019]
###### Editorial Note on Part 1944

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1944 appear at 80 FR 9885, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1944.522 Equal opportunity requirements.

The policies and regulations contained in subpart E of part 1901 of this chapter apply to grants made under this subpart.