alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, David E. Wallace, certify that:     1) I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Superior Well Services, Inc.;     2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b. Intentionally omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 34-47986;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and     5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions); a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.         By:                                                /s/ David E. Wallace    David E. Wallace         Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
#### Alice Levenson, by Her Parent and Natural Guardian Abraham Levenson, et al., Respondents, v. Benjamin Miller, Appellant. (Action No. 1.) Kurt J. Osborne, as Parent and Natural Guardian of Caroll J. Osborne, an Infant, et al., Respondents, v. Benjamin Miller, Appellant, and General Motors Corporation, Respondent. (Action No. 2.)

—Motion by appellant for reargument of appeal from order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated August 3, 1966, granted; and, upon reargument, decision and order of this court, both dated January 9, 1967 [27 A D 2d 659], amended by striking from the decretal paragraph of each the words “ with $10 costs and disbursements payable by appellant to respondents Osborne ” and by substituting therefor the words “without costs”, and otherwise the determination in the decision and order is adhered to. Motion by appellant for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Beldoek, P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Stone Arcade AcquisitionCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31,2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Roger Stone, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executiveand Financial Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,to the best of my knowledge:

(1)           The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periodcertified.

Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities andExchange Commission, this certification is being furnished and is not deemedfiled.

Signed on this 12th day of December, 2006.
|        |                 |   |
|--------|----------------------|--------|
|        | /s/ Roger Stone |   |
|   | Roger Stone          |

 

----
Exhibit 99.1




				Exhibit 99(i)

		 	   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
			       18 U.S.C. ss.1350
			    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
		 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Datascension Inc. (the "Company")
on  Form  10-KSB  for  the  year  ended  December 31, 2004  as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date  therein specified (the "Report")
"Report"), I, D. Scott Kincer, Chief Executive  Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer  of  the  Company, certify  pursuant to  18  U.S.C. ss.1350, as  adopted
pursuant to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of
my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies  with the requirements of  Section  13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information contained in the Report  fairly  presents, in  all
material respects,  the financial condition and  results of  operations  of  the
Company.


                                     ------------------------------------------

                                    DAVID SCOTT KINCER, Chief Executive Officer
					and Principal Accounting Officer

Dated: April 13, 2005
Exhibit
32.2





Certification of Principal
Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of SRKP 2, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Anthony C. Pintsopoulos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Anthony C. PintsopoulosAnthony
      C. PintsopoulosPrincipal
      Financial OfficerNovember
      9, 2010
### -82 -80 -78 -76 38 40 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 06/18 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.77 N 77.11 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
##### 



Exhibit 10.7
 ADVANCED BIOENERGY, LLC
SERIES 2006
 PROMISSORY NOTE
 th
  th
 th




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



3




---



##### 



th
 ADVANCED BIOENERGY, LLCBy
    /s/ Revis L. Stephenson IIIIts:

    Chairman 4




---



##### 



COUNTY OF FILLMORE,
STATE OF NEBRASKABy
    /s/ Rober W. MuellerChairperson  /s/ Amy Nelson

Secretary
 5




---



##### 



WELLS FARGO BANK, NA.By:
    /s/ Chad W. ShirkName:   Its:
    Chad W. Shirk

       Vice President 6
#### § 295.6 Public inspection and copying.

5 U.S.C. 552(a)(2) requires that certain informational materials be made available for public inspection and copying. Such materials maintained by FNS may be inspected and copied during regular office hours (currently 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.). Interested parties may submit requests to the FNS Records Management Officer, Information Technology Division, 3101 Park Center Drive, Alexandria, VA 22302-1500.
#### § 29.9235 How to make application.

Application for certification by class or type of nonquota tobacco shall be made to the office of inspection, not less than 14 days before the date of requested certification. The application shall be in writing and signed by the applicant.
##### 



Exhibit 10.8
  Deed of Trust
 MADE BY
ADVANCED BIOENERGY, LLC
 
 
 Trustor
 TO
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., as trustee
1248 O Street
Lincoln, Nebraska 68508
 Trustee
 FOR THE BENEFIT OF
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
1248 O Street
Lincoln, Nebraska 68508
 Beneficiar Secured Party




---



##### 



Property
 Premises
 Equipment
 Property
 Rents and Profits
  1




---



##### 



Insurance Proceeds Condemnation Proceeds
 Permits, Licenses, Approvals and Agreements
  Issuer Agreement Bonds
 Pursuant to that certain Subordination Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2006 (the
Subordination Agreement), between the Trustee and Farm Credit Services of America, FLCS and
CoBank, ACB as its administrative agent (the Senior Lender), the liens and security interests
granted to the Trustee herein are expressly subordinate to the liens and security interests the
Company has granted or may grant to the Senior Lender. The Subordination Agreement restricts the
ability of the Trustee to enforce the Deed of Trust, to take other actions, and to accept payments
from the Company without the consent of the Senior Lender.
 The Agreement does not restrict the ability of the Company to incur additional indebtedness
and grant liens and security interests to secure such indebtedness. The Senior Credit Facility and
any additional debt of the Company from the Senior Lender will be secured on a senior basis to the
security granted by this Deed of Trust. In addition, the Company may secure certain additional
debt on a parity basis with the security for the Bonds granted herein.
 ARTICLE I
COVENANTS OF TRUSTOR
  Payment of Principal and Interest
 2




---



##### 



Warranty of Title
 Further Assurances
   Conversion and Security
 3




---



##### 



Security Agreement/Construction Security Agreement
 Assignment of Rents and Profits
  4




---



##### 



Limitation of Liability
 5




---



##### 



ARTICLE II
EVENTS OF DEFAULT
 Events of Default
 Obligations, Covenants, Agreements and Bonds
 Other Obligations
 
  Possession
 6




---



##### 



Receiver
   Foreclosure
 Power to Sell
   7




---



##### 



Governing Jurisdiction
  8




---



##### 



Rescission by Beneficiary
 9




---



##### 



Waiver by Trustor
 Application of Sales Proceeds
 No Remedy Exclusive and No Waiver
 Surrender of Premises
   10




---



##### 



Successor Trustor
 Beneficiarys and Trustees Right to Act
     ARTICLE IV
CONCERNING TRUSTEE
 Liability and Acceptance
 11




---



##### 



Resignation
 Successor Trustee
 ARTICLE V
MISCELLANEOUS
 Severability
 Unsecured Debt
 Notices
 12




---



##### 



Request for Notice
 Nonwaiver
 Headings
 Gender and Number
 Counterparts
 Governing Jurisdiction
 Definition of Terms
 Acceptance by Trustee
 13




---



##### 



TRUSTOR:
ADVANCED BIOENERGY, LLC/s/ Revis L. Stephenson IIIChairman STATE OF NEBRASKA
    
    )) ss.COUNTY OF LANCASTER
    
    )
 26th Revis Stephenson III
  /s/ Nancy S. PeekNotary Public 14




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
 Legal Description
  th
   A1
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MA RCH 5, 2020

NO. 03

- 19

- 00705

- CV

Y. S., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JU STIC ES GOODWIN, KELLY, A ND SMITH

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the modified fin al decree signed by the tr i a l court on September 11, 2019

.

Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the C ourt holds that there was no

reversible error in the trial court’s modified final decree

. Therefore, the C ourt affirms the trial

co urt’ s modified final decree

. Because appellant is indigent and u nable to pay costs, no

adjudica t i on of costs is made.
#### § 29.429 Disposition of imported tobacco exceeding pesticide residue standards.

Within 10 days of the receipt of test results from pesticide test samples, the Director shall notify the importer or entity responsible for the lot of tobacco of the test results. If the test results indicate that the lot or any portion of the lot contains prohibited pesticide residues, the Director will notify the importer or entity responsible for the affected tobacco and the appropriate U.S. Customs officials that the tobacco cannot enter the United States. The importer or other entity shall notify the Director in writing of the methods by which the tobacco will be disposed of and provide 5 days advance notice of time and place of final disposition. The Department will monitor the disposition procedures to verify that the tobacco has been accurately identified as to lot, kind, type, and grade.

[54 FR 24663, June 9, 1989]
Case 3:20-cv-05462-MCR-HTC Document 85 Filed 05/02/22 Page 1 of 18
Case 3:20-cv-05462-MCR-HTC Document 85 Filed 05/02/22 Page 2 of 18
Case 3:20-cv-05462-MCR-HTC Document 85 Filed 05/02/22 Page 3 of 18
Case 3:20-cv-05462-MCR-HTC Document 85 Filed 05/02/22 Page 4 of 18
Case 3:20-cv-05462-MCR-HTC Document 85 Filed 05/02/22 Page 5 of 18
Case 3:20-cv-05462-MCR-HTC Document 85 Filed 05/02/22 Page 6 of 18
Case 3:20-cv-05462-MCR-HTC Document 85 Filed 05/02/22 Page 7 of 18
Case 3:20-cv-05462-MCR-HTC Document 85 Filed 05/02/22 Page 8 of 18
Case 3:20-cv-05462-MCR-HTC Document 85 Filed 05/02/22 Page 9 of 18
Case 3:20-cv-05462-MCR-HTC Document 85 Filed 05/02/22 Page 10 of 18
Case 3:20-cv-05462-MCR-HTC Document 85 Filed 05/02/22 Page 11 of 18
Case 3:20-cv-05462-MCR-HTC Document 85 Filed 05/02/22 Page 12 of 18
Case 3:20-cv-05462-MCR-HTC Document 85 Filed 05/02/22 Page 13 of 18
Case 3:20-cv-05462-MCR-HTC Document 85 Filed 05/02/22 Page 14 of 18
Case 3:20-cv-05462-MCR-HTC Document 85 Filed 05/02/22 Page 15 of 18
Case 3:20-cv-05462-MCR-HTC Document 85 Filed 05/02/22 Page 16 of 18
Case 3:20-cv-05462-MCR-HTC Document 85 Filed 05/02/22 Page 17 of 18
Case 3:20-cv-05462-MCR-HTC Document 85 Filed 05/02/22 Page 18 of 18
A Federal Advisory Committee for th e U.S. Environmental Pro tection Agency ’sOffice of Research and Development 43 rd EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FACE-TO-FACE MEETING AGENDA February 4 - 5 , 20 10 Marriott at Metro Center 775 12th Street, NW Washington, DC 20005 Phone: (202) 737 -2200 Thursday, February 4, 2010 8 : 3 0 a.m. – 9 : 00 a.m. Registration 9 : 00 a.m. – 9 : 15 a.m. Welcome and Introductions Dr. Gary S. Sayler, Chair,

- Review of September Executive Committee Meeting Minutes

- Overview of Agenda 9 : 1 5 a .m. – 9 : 3 0 a .m. BOSC DFO Remarks Mr. Greg Susanke , Designated

- Administrative Issues Federal Officer (DFO), Office of Research and Development (ORD) 9 : 3 0 a.m.

– 10: 15 a.m. AA/ORD Remarks Dr. Paul Anastas, Assistant Administrator for ORD 10: 15 a.m. – 1 0 : 30 a.m. Break 1 0 : 30 a.m. – 1 0 : 45 a.m. Subcommittee Updates

- Drinking Water Program Review Dr. Chuck Haas, Subcommittee Chair

- Global Change Program Review Dr. Henry Falk, Subcommittee Vice Chair 1 0 : 45 a.m. – 1 2: 0 0 p.m. Computational Toxicology Dr. Dennis Paustenbach, Chair, Letter Report CompTox Subcommittee

- Presentation

- Discussion 12: 0 0 p.m.

– 1: 0 0 p.m. LunchAgenda for February 4 - 5, 2010 Executive Committee Meeting



### 2 1:00 p.m.

– 1:30 p.m. EPA Science Advisory Board Dr. Vanessa Vu, (SAB) Activities Director SAB 1 : 3 0 p .m. – 2 : 3 0 p .m. Decision Analysis Workgroup Report Dr. Katherine von Stackelberg, Workgroup Chair, Executive Committee 

### 2 : 3 0 p .m. – 2 : 4 5 p.m. Break 2 : 4 5 p.m. – 3 : 15 p.m. Program Review Process: Mr. Greg Susanke, DFO, ORD Recommendations and Changes 3 : 15 p.m. – 3 : 45 p.m. Subcommittee Charge Question Mr. Greg Susanke, DFO, ORD Revisions 3:45 p.m.

– 4: 15 p.m. BOSC Guidance for Development Mr. Greg Susanke, DFO, ORD of Program Review Reports and ORD Mid-Cycle Progress Reports 4: 15 p.m. – 5:00 p . m. Executive Committee Open Forum : Dr. Gary Sayler, Chair, Roles and Issues Executive Committee 5:00 p.m. Recess Friday, February 5, 2010 8 : 30 a .m. – 9:00 a .m. ORD Update Dr. Kevin Teichman, Deputy Assistant Administrator for Science for ORD 9 : 0 0 a .m. – 10 : 0 0 a .m. ORD Response to Clean Air Report Dr. Dan Costa, National Program Director, Clean Air Research Program 10:00 a.m.

– 10 : 15 a.m. Public Comment 10 : 15 a.m. – 1 0 : 30 a.m. Break 10 :30 a.m.

– 1 1 : 3 0 a.m. Executive Committee Open Forum: Dr. Gary Sayler, Chair, Roles and Issues (cont’d) Executive Committee 11: 3 0 a .m. – 12:00 p.m. Future Discussion/Future Business Dr. Gary Sayler, Chair,

- EC Meetings in 2010 Executive Committee

- Future Work 12 : 00 p.m. Adjourn
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2464 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2464

  To amend the Consumer Product Safety Act to remove the exclusion of 
     pistols, revolvers, and other firearms from the definition of 
    ``consumer product'' in order to permit the issuance of safety 
 standards for such articles by the Consumer Product Safety Commission.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 20, 2013

Ms. Kelly of Illinois introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Consumer Product Safety Act to remove the exclusion of 
     pistols, revolvers, and other firearms from the definition of 
    ``consumer product'' in order to permit the issuance of safety 
 standards for such articles by the Consumer Product Safety Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF EXCLUSION FROM THE DEFINITION OF CONSUMER 
              PRODUCT.

    Section 3(a)(5) of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 
2052(a)(5)) is amended by striking subparagraph (E) and redesignating 
subparagraphs (F) through (I) as subparagraphs (E) through (H), 
respectively.
                                 <all>
```
§ 301.32-6 Compliance agreements and cancellation. ( a ) Any person engaged in growing, handling, or moving regulated articles may enter into a compliance agreement when an inspector determines that the person is aware of this subpart, agrees to comply with its provisions, and agrees to comply with all the provisions contained in the compliance agreement.[1]
( b ) Any compliance agreement may be canceled, either orally or in writing, by an inspector whenever the inspector finds that the person who has entered into the compliance agreement has failed to comply with any of the conditions of this subpart or with any of the provisions of the compliance agreement. If the cancellation is oral, the cancellation and the reasons for the cancellation will be confirmed in writing as promptly as circumstances allow. Any person whose compliance agreement has been canceled may appeal the decision, in writing, within 10 days after receiving written notification of the cancellation. The appeal must state all of the facts and reasons upon which the person relies to show that the compliance agreement was wrongfully canceled. As promptly as circumstances allow, the Administrator will grant or deny the appeal, in writing, stating the reasons for the decision. A hearing will be held to resolve any conflict as to any material fact. Rules of practice concerning a hearing will be adopted by the Administrator.
[73 FR 32432, June 9, 2008, as amended at 87 FR 80004, Dec. 29, 2022] Footnotes -
301.32-6
[1] Compliance agreement forms are available without charge from the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Plant Protection and Quarantine, Emergency and Domestic Programs, 4700 River Road Unit 134, Riverdale, MD 20737-1236, and from local PPQ offices, which are listed in telephone directories.
§ 3.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) ( 1 ) The regulations in this part prescribe standards and procedures for use by USDA agencies in the collection, compromise, suspension, or termination of debts owed to the United States.
( 2 ) The regulations in this part apply to all debts of the United States subject to collection by USDA agencies, except as otherwise specified in this part or by statute.
( 3 ) The regulations in this part do not preclude the Secretary from collection, compromise, suspension, or termination of debts as otherwise authorized by law. In such cases the laws and implementing regulations that are specifically applicable to claims collection activities of a particular agency generally will take precedence over this part.
( b ) USDA agencies may issue regulations to supplement this part in order to meet the specific requirements of individual programs.
( c ) The regulations of this part will not apply to: ( 1 ) Collection of debts owed government travel card contractors by USDA employees;
( 2 ) Collection of debts owed by individual Food Stamp Program recipients for whom debt collection procedures are provided under § 273.18 of this title.
( 3 ) Collection of debts owed by foreign governments, sovereign institutions of foreign governments, or public international organizations.
( 4 ) Actions pursuant to the FSA FLP Debt Settlement regulations in part 761, subpart F, of this title are authorized under the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act (ConAct), which are independent of the DCIA are excepted from this part.
( 5 ) Actions pursuant to the following RD Debt Settlement regulations authorized under the ConAct and the Housing Act, which are independent of the DCIA are excepted from this part: ( i ) 7 CFR part 1717, subpart Y;
( ii ) 2 CFR part 175;
( iii ) 7 CFR 1782.20;
( iv ) 7 CFR 1951.213;
( v ) 7 CFR part 1956;
( vi ) 7 CFR part 3550, subpart F;
( vii ) 7 CFR 3560.457; and
( viii ) 7 CFR 3565.56.
[85 FR 36672, June 17, 2020, as amended at 88 FR 89276, Dec. 27, 2023]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cav anagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis,

Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk November 3, 2010

d1027 

# Order

November 3, 2010

141257

MICHAEL SAMEL,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 141257

COA: 296176

Court of Claims: 09

- 000772

- AA

PAROLE BOARD,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the applicatio n for leave to appeal the May 24, 2010 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

D AVIS , J., not participating. I recuse myself and am not par ticipating because I

was on the Court of Appeals panel in this case. See MCR 2.003(B).
#### Emery Air Freight Corporation, Petitioner, v Harry S. Tishelman, as Finance Commissioner of the City of New York, et al., Respondents.

Determination of respondent the City of New York Finance Administration dated August 18, 1978, unanimously confirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Respondents’ application to strike all allegations in paragraph 10 of the petition and Exhibits D through I is denied. No opinion. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Fein, Ross, Bloom and Carro, JJ.