alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 3201.23 Sorbents. ( a ) *Definition.* Materials formulated for use in the cleanup and bioremediation of oil and chemical spills, the disposal of liquid materials, or the prevention of leakage or leaching in maintenance applications, shop floors, and fuel storage areas.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The preferred procurement product must have a biobased content of at least 89 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than May 14, 2009, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased sorbents. By that date, Federal agencies that have the responsibility for drafting or reviewing specifications for items to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased sorbents.
( d ) *Determining overlap with an EPA-designated recovered content product.* Qualifying biobased products that fall under this item may, in some cases, overlap with the EPA-designated recovered content product: Sorbents. USDA is requesting that manufacturers of these qualifying biobased products provide information on the BioPreferred Web site of qualifying biobased products about the intended uses of the product, information on whether or not the product contains any recovered material, in addition to biobased ingredients, and performance standards against which the product has been tested. This information will assist Federal agencies in determining whether or not a qualifying biobased product overlaps with EPA-designated sorbents and which product should be afforded the preference in purchasing.
Note to paragraph ( d
):
Sorbents within this designated item can be made with recycled materials. Under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, section 6002, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency designated sorbents containing recovered materials as items for which Federal agencies must give preference in their purchasing programs. The designation can be found in the Comprehensive Procurement Guideline, 40 CFR 247.17. EPA provides recovered materials content recommendations for sorbents in the Recovered Materials Advisory Notice (RMAN) published for these products. The RMAN recommendations can be found by accessing EPA's Web site *http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/non-hw/procure/products.htm* and then clicking on the appropriate product name.
[73 FR 27953, May 14, 2008]
#### The State ex rel. Temple, Appellee, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio et al.; AT&T Technologies, Inc., Appellant.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Temple v. Indus. Comm.*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 389.]

(No. 97-1252

Submitted August 19, 1998

Decided October 14, 1998.)

*Law Offices of James R. Nein*and *Matthew R. Copp,*for appellee Phyllis J. Temple.

*Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur*and *Karl J. Sutter,*for appellant.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting. I would reverse the court of appeals and reinstate the order of the Industrial Commission.

Cook, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.
```
SPEAKERSCONTENTSINSERTS
```

```
Page 1TOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 2PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 3PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 4PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 5PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 6PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 7PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 8PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 9PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 10PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 11PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 12PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 13PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 14PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 15PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 16PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 17PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 18PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 19PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 20PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 21PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 22PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 23PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 24PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 25PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 26PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 27PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 28PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 29PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 30PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 31PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 32PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 33PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 34PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 35PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 36PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 37PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 38PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 39PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 40PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 41PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 42PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 43PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 44PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 45PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 46PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 47PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 48PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 49PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```

```
Page 50PREV PAGETOP OF DOC
```
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Annual report to Congress**
 
1988 | 1989-90 | 1991 | 1992| 1993 | 1994 | 1996| 1997 | 1999
 
SuDoc Number:E 1.68/2-7:
Item Number:0474-B-10 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000570327
 
February 19, 2020
United States Court of A ppeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED May 9, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 04-11035

_____________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee

v. DAMACIO ANDRADE-CASTANEDA Defendant - Appellant

--------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas (03-CR-295)

--------------------- Before JONES, BARKSDALE, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
IT IS ORDERED that the Appellee’s unopposed motion to vacate the sentence is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Appellee’s unopposed motion
to remand the case to th e United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division for resentencing is granted.

__________________

* Pursuant to 5 th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set fort h in 5 t h Cir. R. 47.5.4.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Appellee’s unopposed motion

to correct the record to include page 10 of the indictment is granted.
#### § 29.3123 Rule 20.

All standard grades must be clean.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 The undersigned, John M. Fluke, Jr., the Interim Principal Executive Officer of CellCyte Genetics Corporation, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CellCyte Genetics Corporation, for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of CellCyte Genetics Corporation. Date: November 19, 2010. /s/ John M. Fluke, Jr.___John M. Fluke, Jr.Interim Principal Executive Officer __________   Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 The undersigned, Randy A. Lieber, the Principal Accounting Officer of CellCyte Genetics Corporation, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CellCyte Genetics Corporation, for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of CellCyte Genetics Corporation. Date: November 19, 2010. /s/ Randy A. Lieber___Randy A. LieberPrincipal Accounting Officer __________
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 14, 2017

Order 

Clerk

July 14, 2017

155428-9(74)

KATIE BARKER, Personal Representative 

of the Estate of PERRY PACE,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 155428

v COA: 328584

Genesee CC: 13-100524-NH

HURLEY MEDICAL CENTER, DR. JOHN DOE,

DENIKA LLOYD, NURSE 1 JANE DOE,

NURSE 2 JANE DOE, and NURSE 3 JANE DOE,

Defendants,

and

DR. PATRICK HAWLEY,

Defendant-Appellant.

___________________________________________

KATIE BARKER, Personal Representative 

of the Estate of PERRY PACE,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 155429

v COA: 328997

Ct of Claims: 13-000072-MH

THE BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, d/b/a

UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH

CENTER, d/b/a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN 

HOSPITAL,

Defendant-Appellant.

___________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellant to extend the time 

for filing its reply is GRANTED. The reply will be accepted as timely filed if submitted 

on or before August 8, 2017.
----

----

Fox Petroleum Inc. 10-Q/A

| (1)   | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 2011, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                     |   |                                                                   |   |
|--------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date: September 29, 2011 | By:    | /s/ William Lieberman                                                  |   |
|                     |   | William Lieberman                                                      |   |
|                     |   | Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Fox Petroleum Inc. |   |
|                     |   |                                                                   |   |
#### § 319.55a Administrative instructions relating to entry of rice straw and rice hulls into Guam.

Rice straw and rice hulls may be imported into Guam without further permit, other than the authorization contained in this paragraph. The port of entry shall be Agana or such other port as may be satisfactory to the inspector. Such importations may be made without the submission of a notice of arrival inasmuch as there is available to the inspector the essential information normally supplied by an importer at the time of importation. The requirements of §§ 319.55-6 and 319.55-7 shall not apply. Inspections of such importations may be made under the general authority of § 330.105(a) of this chapter. If an importation is found infected, infested, or contaminated by any plant pest and is not subject to disposal under this part, disposition may be made in accordance with § 330.106 of this chapter.
---





CERTIFICATION OFCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

I, Peter J. Hoyle, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of GA Computer Sciences Inc. (the Company), hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for
      the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2006, and to which this certification
      is attached as Exhibit 32 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                          

| | By:    | /s/
      Peter J. Hoyle         
| | ------ | ---------------------------------
| |        |                                  
| | Name:  | PETER J. HOYLE                   
| |        |                                  
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and Chief
| |        | Financial Officer                
| |        |                                  
| | Date:  | March 15, 2006                   

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
#### § 3011.3 Indexes.

5 U.S.C. 552(a)(2) also requires that each agency maintain and make available for public inspection and copying current indexes providing identifying information for the public with regard to any records which are made available for public inspection and copying. OFM does not maintain any materials within the scope of these requirements.
EXHIBIT 13.1

            SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                          SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

In connection with the annual report of Widescope Resources Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  20-F  for the  period  ending  December  31,  2006 as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Edward
Dolejsi,  President  and CEO of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

(1) the Report containing the financial statements of the Company fully complies
with  the  requirements  of  section  13(a)  or  15(d),  as  applicable,  of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 27, 2007


/s/ Edward Dolejsi
-------------------------------
Edward Dolejsi
President and CEO

* A signed original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO. 4:03cr64-SPM

JOSEPH L. THOMAS, JR.,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

ORDER CONTINUING VIOLATION HEARING

For good cause shown, Defendant’s Motion to Continue Violation of

Supervised Release Hearing (doc. 41) is granted. The violation hearing is reset

for 1:30 p.m. on October 16, 2006. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 16th day of August, 2006.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 4:03-cr-00064-MW-CAS Document 42 Filed 08/16/06 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          491115
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                491115
<PP&E>                                         4668436
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1402262
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3787428
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            40128
<BONDS>                                         546217
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     3201083
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3787428
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                763816
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                689948
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               47336
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     26532
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 1:91-cr-01032-MP-AK

PABLO EDMUNDO CRUZ,

Defendant.

___________________________/

O R D E R 

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 827, Mr. Cruz's Motion for Reconsideration of

the order at Doc. 811. On January 29, 2004, Mr. Cruz was found to have violated his supervised

release and was sentenced to 60 months imprisonment. At the close of the hearing, the

defendant asked the Court to address the issue of whether the time served in state prison could

count toward his federal sentence. The Court informed Mr. Cruz that such matters are typically

left to the Bureau of Prisons. 

Later, when the Federal Bureau of Prisons addressed the time served issue, it sent the

Court a letter. The letter asked if the Court objected to Mr. Cruz' state facility being designated,

nunc pro tunc, as the place for serving his federal sentence, thus making the two sentences

effectively concurrent. In the order at doc. 811, the Court responded by objecting to the

designation as inconsistent with the Court's concerns in sentencing Mr. Cruz. Mr. Cruz now

seeks to have the Court reconsider that order, arguing that the response to the Bureau of Prisons

was inconsistent with the statement during the January 29, 2004, revocation hearing that the

Court would leave the time-served issue to the Bureau of Prisons. The motion is denied. The

issues of designation and credit for time served are still being addressed by the Bureau of

Case 1:91-cr-01032-MW-GRJ Document 828 Filed 01/09/07 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 1:91-cr-01032-MP-AK

Prisons, and it is not inappropriate for the Bureau of Prisons to seek this Court's response

regarding designation. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

The motion for reconsideration, doc. 827, is denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of January, 2007

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:91-cr-01032-MW-GRJ Document 828 Filed 01/09/07 Page 2 of 2
# Daily Treasury Statement

            This data moved to FiscalData.Treasury.gov on November 1, 2023, where it is available for download in multiple machine-readable formats with complete metadata!  The formats include CSV, JSON and XML.  The CSV and JSON formats replace the Excel and text formats previously available on this site.

The Daily Treasury Statement summarizes the US Treasury’s cash and debt operations for the Federal Government on a modified cash basis.  Deposits are reported as received and withdrawals are reported as processed.

Current Daily Treasury Statement

The DTS presents a summary of:

- Operating Cash Balance
- Deposits and Withdrawals of Operating Cash
- Public Debt Transactions
- Federal Tax Deposits
- Short-Term Cash Investments
- Income Tax Refunds Issued

The information is provided by Federal Reserve Banks, Treasury Regional Financial Centers, Internal Revenue Service Centers, Bureau of the Fiscal Service and various electronic systems.  Treasury’s operating cash is maintained in an account at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

## Stay up to Date with the Daily Treasury Statement

Subscribe to e-mail notifications!

Join the Mailing List

(Selecting this button generates an e-mail message with everything filled in - just send the message.   You will receive a confirmation message from the list in 15 minutes.   If the e-mail does not appear, see our alternate instructions)

Last modified 11/01/23
#### § 3.61 Presiding employee.

An agency reviewing officer may be an agency employee, or the agency may provide for reviews to be done by another agency through an interagency agreement. No agency employee may act as a reviewing officer for the consideration of collection by administrative offset in a matter for which the employee was a contracting officer or a debt management officer.
(October 22, 1980)

#### In the Matter of Rafael Perez, Petitioners, and Agustin Alamo, Appellant, v Anthony Sadowski et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents, and Monserrate Flores et al., Respondents.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered on or about October 16, 1980, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. We are in agreement that the failure to segregate the candidates for the two different assembly districts was fatal. No opinion. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Lupiano, Silverman, Yesawich and Carro, JJ.