U.S

.Deportment of Transportation FederalAviation Administration March 14, 2016

Mrs. Carol Allen and Mr. Jim Allen Parents ofDevin Allen 44460 Highgate Drive Clinton Township, Ml 48038 Dear Mrs. and Mr. Allen: Exemption No. 15218 800 Independence Ave

.. SW Washington

. D

. C 2059 1

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2013-0133

This letter is to inform you that we have granted yourrequest for exemption. Ittransmits our decision, explains its basis, and lists the conditions and limitations ofthe exemption, including the date it ends. 

### The Basis for Our Decision By letter posted to the docket on January 13, 2016, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalfofyour son Devin Allen for an exemption from 

### § 121.311(b) ofTitle 14, Code ofFederal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, ifgranted, would allow Devin to exceed the specified weight and/or height limit for an FAA-approved child restraint system (CAReS, manufactured by AmSafe Corporation) during use ofthat child restraint system (CRS) aboard a United States (U.S.)-registered aircraft. 

### In Devin's case, although he is currently 14 years old, he will be over 18 years old before this exemption terminates, therefore, an exemption must also be granted from the requirement in 

### § 121.31l(b), that the individual be a "child"
. However, the reasons for requesting this exemption do not differ materially from those presented by other petitioners and the reasons stated by the FAA for granting other exemptions also apply to the situation you present. The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary ofthe petition in the Federal Register, because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Devin. The FAA has issued grants ofexemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. 

### In Grants ofExemption Nos
. 7831 and 8264 (copies enclosed), the FAA found that numerous people withphysical challenges had previously completed flights using restraint systems.

AFS-16-5394-E2 The use ofthese restraint systems addressed unique physical needs regarding safety, support, and security in the same manner ofoperations as described in this petition. The FAA further found that the petition would not set any new precedents regarding the use ofrestraint systems by persons with disabilities. Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that- • they are similar in all material respects to reliefpreviously requested in the enclosed Grant ofExemption Nos. 7831 and 8264; • the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant ofExemption Nos. 7831 and 8264 also apply to the situation you present; and • a grant ofexemption is in the public interest. Our Decision Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 

### §§ I06(f), 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant Devin Allen an exemption from 

### § 121.311(b). 

### In addition, any air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 while Devin is aboard its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR 

### § 121.311(b) to the extent necessary to allow him to exceed the specified weight and/or height limit for an FAAapproved CRS during use aboard a U.S.-registered aircraft. All operations under this exemption must be conducted with at least one ofDevin's parents or a caregiver accompanying him. Devin may only occupy a passenger seat with no passenger seated behind him. In addition, Devin' s parent or caregiver must carry a copy ofthis exemption and advise the air carrier about the contents ofthe exemption at least 48 hours before the date ofeach flight. This exemption terminates on February 28, 2021, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. Sincerely,

# ~~14f:ht Swndaros Sernce

Enclosures