alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C SECTION 350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Oakmont Acquisition Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006, (the Report), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael C. Azar, President, Secretary, Principal Accounting Officer and a Director of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2006                                      
|                                                           
|/s/ Michael C. Azar                                        
|Michael C. Azar                                            
|President, Secretary, Chief Accounting Officer and Director



18
#### The State ex rel. Mayberry, Appellant, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellee.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Mayberry v. Indus. Comm.*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 375.]

(No. 97-979

Submitted August 19, 1998

Decided October 14, 1998.)

*Law Offices of James R. Nein*and *Brian W. Harter,*for appellant.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Michael A. Vanderhorst,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
#### § 29.428 Identification of sample for testing.

Samples of imported tobacco shall be identified by the inspector on a form approved by the Director. The original and first two copies shall accompany the sample to the designated testing facility. The remaining copy of the identification form will be sent to the Director. Upon the completion of testing the designated facility will complete the form and mail the original and one copy to the Director and retain one copy for their records.

[51 FR 30199, Aug. 22, 1986]
§ 249.1 General purpose and scope. ( a ) This part announces regulations under which the Secretary of Agriculture shall carry out the Senior Farmers' Market Nutrition Program (SFMNP). The purposes of the SFMNP are to: ( 1 ) Provide resources in the form of fresh, nutritious, unprepared, locally grown fruits, vegetables, honey, and herbs from farmers' markets, roadside stands, and community supported agriculture (CSA) programs to low-income seniors;
( 2 ) Increase the domestic consumption of agricultural commodities by expanding or aiding in the expansion of domestic farmers' markets, roadside stands, and CSAs; and
( 3 ) Develop or aid in the development of new and additional farmers' markets, roadside stands, and CSAs.
( b ) These goals will be accomplished through payment of cash grants to approved State agencies. The SFMNP shall be supplementary to the food stamp program carried out under the Food Stamp Act of 1977 (7 U.S.C. 2011, *et seq.*), and to any other Federal or State food or nutrition assistance program under which foods are distributed to needy families in lieu of food stamps.
[71 FR 74630, Dec. 12, 2006, as amended at 74 FR 48374, Sept. 23, 2009]
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. Case No: 3:97cr130/RV

3:05cv140/RV/MD

HAROLD DENSON

_____________________________________________________________________

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and

recommendation dated April 21, 2005. The defendant previously has been furnished

a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to

file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have

made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been

made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto

timely filed by the parties, I have determined that the report and recommendation

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 2255 (doc. 131) is summarily DISMISSED as successive.

DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of May, 2005.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:97-cr-00130-RV-MD Document 134 Filed 05/09/05 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-2314

WILLIAM KWAME DOH,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A70-675-651)

Submitted: July 28, 2006 Decided: August 3, 2006

Before WILKINSON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Randall L. Johnson, JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Arlington,

Virginia, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney

General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Assistant Director, Diane

Kelleher, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for

Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

William Kwame Doh, a native and citizen of Ghana,

petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”)

order adopting and affirming the immigration judge’s decision

denying the motion to reopen. We deny the petition for review. 

We do not have jurisdiction to review the Board’s

decision not to sua sponte reopen proceedings. Ali v. Gonzales,

448 F.3d 515, 518 (2d Cir. 2006). In addition, we find the

immigration judge did not abuse his discretion in denying the

motion to reopen as untimely. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.23(b)(4)(ii)

(2005).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
#### § 29.2274 Green (G).

A term applied to green-colored tobacco. Any leaf which has a green color affecting 20 percent or more of its surface may be described as green. (See Rule 18, § 29.2409.)
#### §§ 1786.1-1786.24 [Reserved]
#### § 29.3564 Unsound (U).

Damaged under 20 percent. (See Rule 21, § 29.3622.)

[30 FR 9207, July 23, 1965. Redesignated at 49 FR 16759, Apr. 20, 1984]
MOTION DOCKET

98-1464.

#### State v. Kelly.

Medina App. No. 2670-M. On motion for appointment of counsel. Motion denied.

Resnick and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.
§ 1728.10 General purpose and scope. ( a ) The requirements of this part are based on contractual provisions between RUS and the organizations which receive financial assistance from RUS.
( b ) RUS will establish certain specifications and standards for materials, equipment, and construction units that will be acceptable for RUS financial assistance for the electric program. Materials and equipment purchased by the electric borrowers or accepted as contractor-furnished material must conform to RUS standards and specifications where they have been established and, if included in RUS Bulletin 43-5, “List of Materials Acceptable for Use on Systems of RUS Electrification Borrowers” (List of Materials), must be selected from that list or must have received technical acceptance from RUS. RUS, through its Technical Standards Committees, will evaluate certain materials, equipment and construction units, and will determine acceptance.
[50 FR 47710, Nov. 20, 1985. Redesignated at 55 FR 39395, Sept. 27, 1990]
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2238 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2238

To amend the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 
          to exempt the Crime Victims Fund from sequestration.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 4, 2013

 Mr. Costa (for himself and Mr. Poe of Texas) introduced the following 
        bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Budget

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 
          to exempt the Crime Victims Fund from sequestration.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FROM SEQUESTRATION.

    Subsection (g)(1)(A) of section 255 of the Balanced Budget and 
Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 is amended by inserting after the 
item relating to Continuing Fund, Southwestern Power Administration 
(the second place it appears) the following new item:
                    ``Crime Victims Fund (15-5041-0-2-754).''.
                                 <all>
```
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 1:02-cr-00045-MP-AK

CRAIG CHARLES BOLLES,

Defendant.

________________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 162, Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge, which recommends that Defendant’s Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. §

2255, Doc. 138, be granted to the extent that he seeks to appeal his sentence. The Magistrate

Judge filed the Report and Recommendation on Wednesday, August 1, 2007. The parties have

been furnished a copy of the Report and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections. 

Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), this Court must make a de novo

review of those portions to which an objection has been made. In this instance, however, no

objections have been filed. 

Defendant pled guilty to conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute a

quantity of Methylene-dioxy-methamphetamine, and was sentenced to 170 months

imprisonment. Defendant appealed his sentence, which was dismissed for failure to prosecute. 

In his motion to vacate, Defendant alleges that counsel was ineffective by allowing his appeal to

be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The Court agrees with the Magistrate that Defendant has

made out a successful ineffective assistance of counsel claim. Counsel’s deficient performance

effectively deprived Defendant of an appeal that he otherwise would have taken. Therefore,

having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the lack of objections thereto, I have

Case 1:02-cr-00045-MP-GRJ Document 177 Filed 09/20/07 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 1:02-cr-00045-MP-AK

determined that it should be adopted. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted and

incorporated herein.

2. Defendant’s Motion to Vacate, Doc. 138, is GRANTED.

3. The Amended Judgment, Doc. 110, is VACATED, and the same sentence is REIMPOSED. 

4. Defendant is advised that he has ten days from the date of the re-imposed

sentence in which to file a notice of appeal.

DONE AND ORDERED this 20th day of September, 2007

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:02-cr-00045-MP-GRJ Document 177 Filed 09/20/07 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Commercial Lines Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark R. Holden, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations ofthe Company.     /s/ Mark R. HoldenNovember10, 2005 Mark R. Holden  President and Chief Executive Officer
2006-0819.

#### Funck v. Pierce.

Hamilton App. No. C-050487. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. It appears from the records of the court that the appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due May 22, 2006, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause is dismissed sua sponte.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Connie Ray Palmer, TDCJ #1583752

, Appellant

No. 06

- 20

- 00094

- CV v.

Shavonda D. Howard, et al. , Appellee Appeal from the 12th District Court of Walker County, Texas (Tr. Ct

. No. 20 29732 ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice Stevens

, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Burgess participating

.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court
below. We affirm the judgment of the trial c ourt. We note that the appellant, Connie Ray Palmer , has adequately indicated h is inability to
pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JULY 20, 2021 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Au trey , Clerk
#### § 29.3507 Clean.

Tobacco is described as clean when it contains only a normal amount of sand or soil particles. Leaves grown on the lower portion of the stalk normally contain more dirt or sand than those from higher stalk positions. (See Rule 4, § 29.3605.)
#### § 28.406 Strict Good Ordinary Color.

Strict Good Ordinary Color is color which is within the range represented by a set of samples in the custody of the United States Department of Agriculture in a container marked “Original Official Cotton Standards of the United States, American Upland, Strict Good Ordinary, effective July 1, 1987.”
<PAGE>

Exhibit 10.13

                  WRITTEN DESCRIPTION OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
              PURSUANT TO ITEM 601(b)(10)(iii)(A) OF REGULATION S-K

For 2005, the Board of Directors of Bank of Granite Corporation (the "Company")
approved changes in the Company's director fees, as recommended by the Board of
Director's Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Under the 2005 fee
arrangement, director fees will be paid only to nonemployee directors. Each
nonemployee director will be paid a retainer in the amount of $7,500 per year
and a fee for each Board or committee meeting attended in the amount of $250.
Committee chairpersons will receive $400 for each committee meeting they conduct
in lieu of the $250 meeting fee paid to the other directors in attendance.
Directors will continue to receive a reimbursement for miles traveled to
meetings at the Company's standard mileage reimbursement rates, which are
consistent with those set by the Internal Revenue Service.
#### The State of Ohio, Appellant, *v.*Johnson, Appellee.

[Cite as *State v. Johnson*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 565.]

(No. 97-2324

Submitted October 13, 1998

Decided November 18, 1998.)

*566
      *R. Larry Schneider,*Union County Prosecuting Attorney, and *Rick Rodger,*Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of *State v. Cook*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570.

The cause is remanded to the trial court to conduct a sexual predator classification hearing pursuant to R.C. 2950.09(C)(2).

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

           

DREAM DEFENDERS, 

NEW FLORIDA MAJORITY EDUCATION FUND, 

ORGANIZE FLORIDA EDUCATION FUND,  

ZEBRA COALITION, 

ACACIA WILLIAMS, 

BIANCA MARIA BAEZ, 

MURRAY HELLER, 

PAULINA HERNANDEZ MORALES, 

CELCIO EDUARDO ROMERO, 

SHEILA YOUNG, and 

TERRIAYNA SPILLMAN, 

    Plaintiffs,  

v.                Case No. 1:20cv67‐RH‐GRJ 

RON DESANTIS et al., 

    Defendants. 

______________________________________________/ 

JUDGMENT 

This judgment is entered under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 54(b). 

The judgment dismisses the claims of the original plaintiffs in this individual case 

but not the claims of the intervening plaintiffs. The dismissal follows (1) an order 

determining that claims against the defendant Florida Elections Canvassing 

Case 1:20-cv-00067-RH-GRJ Document 126 Filed 07/24/20 Page 1 of 3
Commission in its name are barred by the Eleventh Amendment, (2) an order 

determining the court lacks jurisdiction over the plaintiff Zebra Coalition’s claims, 

(3) separate orders voluntarily dismissing the claims of the plaintiffs Acacia 

Williams, Bianca Maria Baez, Terriayna Spillman, Ray Winters, and Kathleen 

Winters, and (4) a settlement agreement calling for dismissal of the all other 

claims.  

It is adjudged: 

1. All claims against the defendant Florida Elections Canvassing Commission 

in its name are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. 

2. All claims of the plaintiff Zebra Coalition are dismissed for lack of 

jurisdiction. 

3. All claims of the plaintiffs Acacia Williams, Bianca Maria Baez, Terriayna 

Spillman, Ray Winters, and Kathleen Winters are voluntarily dismissed without 

prejudice.  

4. The claim of the other original plaintiffs—Dream Defenders, New Florida 

Majority Education Fund, Organize Florida Education Fund, Murray Heller, Paulina 

Hernandez Morales, Celcio Eduardo Romero, and Sheila Young—challenging the 

failure to provide an accessible method for virtually or manually impaired voters 

Case 1:20-cv-00067-RH-GRJ Document 126 Filed 07/24/20 Page 2 of 3
to cast a private and independent mail ballot is dismissed with prejudice against 

the state‐level defendants and without prejudice against the county‐level 

defendants. 

5. All other claims of the plaintiffs Dream Defenders, New Florida Majority 

Education Fund, Organize Florida Education Fund, Murray Heller, Paulina 

Hernandez Morales, Celcio Eduardo Romero, and Sheila Young are dismissed with 

prejudice. 

          JESSICA J. LYUBLANOVITS 

                                         CLERK OF COURT 

July 24, 2020                    s/Adelita Tinaya‐Miller___        

DATE                        Deputy Clerk: Adelita Tinaya‐Miller 

Case 1:20-cv-00067-RH-GRJ Document 126 Filed 07/24/20 Page 3 of 3
MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

2006-0644.

#### State v. Strowder.

Cuyahoga App. No. 85792, 2006-Ohio-442. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal is granted. Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.
Description of Compensatory Aggrangement with Marcus G. Smith



 Exhibit 10.26 
  
 Description of Compensatory Arrangement 
 with Mr. Marcus
G. Smith 
  
 In connection with his appointment as Executive Vice
President of National Sales and Marketing of Speedway Motorsports, Inc. (the “Company”) in February 2004, Mr. Marcus G. Smith’s compensation was clarified to reflect the responsibilities and obligations of his new position. Consistent
with Company policy, Mr. Smith does not have an employment contract. His compensation for fiscal year 2004 includes an annual base salary of $120,000 and sales commissions based on gross sales, at the following rates: 
  

				
	 Performance Racing Network
	  	7.0	%
	 Gross Sales of:
	  	 	 
	 $0 to $10 million
	  	1.5	%
	 $10 million to $12 million
	  	2.5	%
	 $12 million to $14 million
	  	3.5	%

  
 The commissions outlined above
are consistent with Mr. Smith’s position and the sales commission and bonus program of the Company. It is anticipated that in future years, Mr. Smith’s annual compensation will continue to be determined by the Company’s Compensation
Committee in accordance with its policies regarding executive officers and any commission bonuses will continue to be consistent with the Company’s overall sales commission and bonus program.
#### § 29.3054 Semicured.

Tobacco in the process of being cured or which is partially but not thoroughly cured. Semicured includes tobacco which contains fat stems, wet butts, swell stems, frozen tobacco, and tobacco having frozen stems or stems that have not been thoroughly dried in the curing process. (See Rule 23.)

[24 FR 8771, Oct. 29, 1959. Redesignated at 47 FR 51722, Nov. 17, 1982, and at 49 FR 16758, Apr. 20, 1984]
#### § 29.1010 Crude.

A subdegree of maturity. Crude leaves are usually hard and slick as a result of extreme immaturity. A similar condition may result from fire-kill, sunburn, or sunscald. Any leaf which is crude to the extent of 20 percent or more of its surface may be described as crude. (See Rule 20.)
#### § 29.3122 Rule 19.

Crude leaves shall not be included in any grade of any color except green, green tan, and green red. Any lot containing 20 percent or more of crude leaves shall be designated as Nondescript.
#### § 29.1059 Special factor.

A symbol or term authorized to be used with specified grades. Tobacco to which a special factor is applied may meet the general specifications but which has a peculiar side or characteristic which tends to modify the grade. (See Rules 10, 21, 22, 26, 28, 29, and 30.)

[60 FR 36027, July 13, 1995, as amended at 65 FR 46086, July 27, 2000]