T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). M V D / Invent o ry NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T JO S E P E D R O G O N Z A L E Z , ak a Jo se P edro G on za l ez M enj i var, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 74909 A ge nc yN o. A 095- 140- 914 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r15, 2009 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E an dF IS H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. J os e P e dr o G onz a l e z , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of E l S a l va dor , pe t i t i ons f or re vi ew of a B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s orderdi sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l fr om an 

# FI LED DE C 28 2009 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS2

M V D / I n v en t or y 08- 74909 i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s de c i s i on de ny i ng hi s appl i c a t i on f ora s y l um , w i thhol di ng of r e m ova l and pr ot e c t i on unde rthe C onve nt i on A ga i ns tT ortur e ( C A T ) . W e ha ve j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew fa ctual fi nd i ng s f or subst ant i al e v id e n c e , Sa ntos-L em us v. Mukasey , 542 F . 3d 738, 742 ( 9th C i r . 2008) , a nd de ny th e p e t i t i o n f

o rr e v i e w. S ubs t ant i a l e vi de nc e s upport s the I J ’ s de t e rm i na t i on tha tno e xc e pt i ons ap p lie dto e x c u s e G o n z a le z ’s u n tim e lya s y lu m ap p lic a tio n . See 8 U . S. C. § 1 15 8(a) (2)( B ) ( re qu i ri ng pet i t i on ert o app l y f or as ylum w i thi n o ne ye arof arri val i n U ni t ed S t at es un l es s pre vent ed by extra ordi naryci rc um st ance s or c hang ed ci rc um st ance s m at er i al l y a ff ec t i ng el i gi bi l i ty f

or re l i ef ). S ubs t ant i a l e vi de nc e s upport s the B oar d’ s de ni a l of a s y l um a nd w i thhol di ng o f r e m o v a l b e c au s e G o n z a le z f a ile dto s h o w h is a lle g e dp e r s e c u to r s th r e a te n e dh im on ac coun tof a prot ec t ed grou nd . H i s f ear of f uture pers ec ut i on base d o n an actual or i m pu t ed ant i -gang o r ant i -c ri m e opi ni on i s noton ac coun tof the prot ec t ed g r o u n do f

e ith e rm e m b e r s h ip in ap artic u lars o c ia l g r o up o rp o litic a l o p in io n . See R am os B arri os v. H

older , 5 8 1 F .3 d8 4 9 , 8 5 4 - 5 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) ; Santos -L e m us at 7 4 5 - 4 6 ; s e e O c h a v e v . I NS , 2 5 4 F .3 d8 5 9 , 8 6 5 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 1 ) ( “A s y lu m g e n e r a lly i s notavai l abl e t o v i ct i m s of c i vi l stri fe , un l es s they are si ng l ed ou ton ac coun tof a prot ec t ed grou nd . ”)3

M V D / I n v en t or y 08- 74909 S ubs t ant i a l e vi de nc e a l s o s upport s the B oar d’ s de ni a l of C A T r e l i e f

ba s e d on the B oar d’ s f

i ndi ng tha tG onz a l e z di d note s t abl i s h al i ke l i hood of t ortur e by , a tthe i nst i gat i on of, or w i th the consentor ac qu i es ce nce of the E l S al vado ran g o v e rn m e n t. See A rteaga v. Mukasey , 51 1 F . 3d94 0, 94 8-49 (9th C i r. 20 07 ). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.