alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 28.19 Withdrawal or rejection of classification request.

Any classification request may be withdrawn by the applicant at any time before the classification of the cotton covered thereby, subject to the payment of such fees, if any, as may be prescribed in these regulations. Any classification request may be rejected by the Area Director or the Head of the Quality Control Section for noncompliance with the act or this subpart.

[52 FR 30881, Aug. 18, 1987]
Editorial Note on Part 1956
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1956 appear at 80 FR 9901, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1956.111 Debtors in bankruptcy. Rural Development personnel will process reorganization plans of debtors filing under Chapter 9, Chapter 11, or Chapter 13 as follows: ( a ) Plans submitted by debtors under Chapters 9, 11, and 13 must be sent by the servicing official to the State Director who will recommend either acceptance or rejection of the plans and refer them to the United States Attorney through OGC. When the plan calls for the adjustment of a debt to Rural Development, the State Director will obtain the advice of the Administrator before providing OGC with a recommendation on acceptance or rejection of this plan.
( b ) The United States Attorney will advise the State Director, through OGC, as to approval or rejection of the debtor's reorganization plan. The State Director will then notify the Finance Office by memorandum of the terms and conditions of the bankruptcy reorganization plan, including any adjustment of the debt.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2251 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2251

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Thursday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and thirteen

                                 An Act

 
 To designate the United States courthouse and Federal building located 
at 118 South Mill Street, in Fergus Falls, Minnesota, as the ``Edward J. 
         Devitt United States Courthouse and Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.
    The United States courthouse and Federal building located at 118 
South Mill Street, in Fergus Falls, Minnesota, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Edward J. Devitt United States Courthouse and 
Federal Building''.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.
    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse and Federal 
building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to 
the ``Edward J. Devitt United States Courthouse and Federal Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### § 29.2528 Leaf.

Whole, unstemmed leaf. Leaf, when applied to tobacco in strip form, shall describe the divided unit of a whole leaf.

[49 FR 16757, Apr. 20, 1984]
**Exhibit32.1**

Certification ofPrincipal Executive OfficerPursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended  September 30, 2007(the “Report”) of ATS Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Edward H. Bersoff,Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Registrant.
| Date: November 8, 2007 |       | By:        | /s/ Edward H. Bersoff |
|------------------------|------------|------------|-----------------------|
| ** **             | ** ** | ** ** | ** **            | **Edward  H. Bersoff** |
| ** **             | ** ** | ** ** | ** **            | **Chairman  and Chief Executive Officer** |
| ** **             | ** ** | ** ** | ** **            | **(Principal  Executive Officer)** |

 

 

 

----
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.59

                               ELEVENTH AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                      FISHER SCIENTIFIC INTERNATIONAL INC.
                         SAVINGS AND PROFIT SHARING PLAN

      WHEREAS, Fisher Scientific International Inc. (the "Company") established
and maintains the Fisher Scientific International Inc. Savings and Profit
Sharing Plan (the "Plan"); and

      WHEREAS, the Fisher Scientific International Inc. Administrative and
Investment Committee (the "Committee") has the authority pursuant to Sections
11.1 and 11.5 of the Plan to amend the Plan; and

      WHEREAS, the Committee desires to impose a one-year eligibility
requirement for the purpose of Company matching contributions except for those
employees subject to a specific collective bargaining agreement;

      NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved as follows:

      RESOLVED, that effective as of January 1, 2005, Section 2.1 of the Plan is
hereby amended by the addition of a new subsection (c) to read in its entirety
as follows:

      "(c) Eligibility for Company Matching Contributions. Any Employee hired on
or after January 1, 2005 shall be eligible to receive Company Basic Matching
Contributions as of the first payroll period coinciding with or next following
the completion of one Year of Service. This requirement shall not apply to any
Employee covered by the collective bargaining agreement with the United
Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners, Arkansas Regional Counsel, Local Number
1225 who shall remain eligible for Company Basic Matching Contributions upon
becoming a Participant in the Plan."

      RESOLVED, FINALLY, that all other provisions of the Plan shall remain in
full force and effect.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Fisher Scientific International Inc. Savings and
Profit Sharing Plan is amended this 22 day of December, 2004.

                                        ADMINISTRATIVE AND INVESTMENT COMMITTEE

                                        /s/ Paul M. Meister
                                        ------------------------------------
                                        Paul M. Meister

                                        /s/ Todd M. DuChene
                                        ------------------------------------
                                        Todd M. DuChene
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF QUINTANA MARITIME LIMITED

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350

In connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended
September 30, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Stamatis V. Molaris, Chief Executive Officer of Quintana Maritime Limited (the Company), hereby certify, to my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Stamatis V. MolarisStamatis V. MolarisChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)


Date: November 9, 2007
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED BY 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Banner Resources Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period
ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Robert Krause, President and Treasurer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

| | (1) |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) |  | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
as of                and for the period covered by the Report.
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

Date:   February 21, 2007

| | By   /s/ Robert Krause
        ___________________________________
        Robert Krause, President and Treasurer
        (Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of CEO Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of KapStone Paper andPackaging Corporation for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Roger W. Stone, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of KapStone Paper andPackaging Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to my knowledge:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation.

 
| Dated: May 5, 2010 |                                  |                |
|-------------------------|---------------------------------------|---------------------|
|                    |                                  |                |
|                    | By:                                   | /s/  Roger W. Stone |
|                    |                                  | Roger  W. Stone     |
|                    | Chairman and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
#### HOYE, Respondent, v. PENNSYLVANIA R. CO., Appellant, et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October *112217, 1906.)

Action by Stephen M. Hoye against the Pennsylvania Railroad Company and the Westcott Express Company.

No opinion. Motion for reargument denied. See 100 N. Y. Supp. 190.
#### § 29.1067 Tobacco.

Tobacco as it appears between the time it is primed and cured, and the time it enters into the different manufacturing processes. The acts of stemming, threshing, sweating, and conditioning are not regarded as manufacturing processes. Tobacco, as used in these standards, does not include manufactured or semi-manufactured products, stems, cuttings, clippings, trimmings, siftings, or dust.

[42 FR 21092, Apr. 25, 1977. Redesignated at 47 FR 51721, Nov. 17, 1982, and at 48 FR 29671, June 28, 1983. Redesignated and amended at 49 FR 16756, Apr. 20, 1984, and further redesignated at 51 FR 25027, July 10, 1986]
#### § 29.6005 Case (order).

The state of tobacco with respect to its moisture content.
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of China Natural Resources, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Li Feilie, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Li Feilie

Li Feilie

Chief Executive Officer

April 27, 2012

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JONATHAN SCROGGINS,

Plaintiff, 

v. 4:20cv156–WS/MAF

SGT. J. SWINDLE,

et al.,

Defendants.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF

No. 30) docketed April 26, 2021. The magistrate judge recommends that 

Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 28) be granted. Plaintiff did not respond

to Defendants’ motion to dismiss and has filed no objections to the report and

recommendation.

The court having carefully reviewed the record, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation is ADOPTED and

incorporated by reference into this order.
Page 2 of 2

2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 28) is GRANTED.

2. Plaintiff’s first amended complaint (ECF No. 11) and this action are

DISMISSED for failure to exhaust administrative remedies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

1997(e).

3. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: “All claims are DISMISSED for

failure to exhaust administrative remedies.”

DONE AND ORDERED this 26th day of May , 2021.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0556

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

PITASKUMMAPI DAVID GREEN,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including November 17, 2023, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 12 2023

10/12/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0556
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7556

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DOUGLAS ALAN JARVIS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District

Judge. (2:91-cr-00070; 2:97-cv-00524-RAJ)

Submitted: November 21, 2006 Decided: December 4, 2006

Before TRAXLER and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Douglas Alan Jarvis, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart,

Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Douglas Alan Jarvis seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration

of the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 (2000) motion, and a subsequent margin order denying his

motion for reconsideration. The orders are not appealable unless

a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability.

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000); Reid v. Angelone, 369 F.3d 363, 369

(4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court

is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jarvis has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability, deny Jarvis’ motion for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
- 3 -

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### AGULNICK v. RAUCH.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

June 18, 1914.)

Courts (§ 189*)—Municipal Courts—Replevin—Judgment.

Under Municipal Court Act (Laws 1902, c. 580) § 123, providing relative to actions of replevin that, if defendant has demanded judgment for the return of a chattel which was replevied and delivered to plaintiff, final judgment in his favor must award possession thereof, and the sum fixed as its value to be paid by plaintiff if possession is not delivered, the court has no power to grant judgment in defendant’s favor for a return of the chattels, or in default thereof judgment for their value, in the absence of a demand in the answer for judgment for the return of the chattels.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Courts, Cent. Dig. §§ 409, 412, 413, 429, 458; Dec. Dig. § 189.*]

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of the Bronx, Second District.

Action by Sam Agulnick against Fred Rauch. From- a judgment for defendant, after a trial by the court without a jury, plaintiff appeals.

Modified.

Argued June term, 1914, before SEABURY, PAGE, and BIJUR, JJ.

Rosansky & Goldberg, of New York City (Julius H. Rosansky, of counsel), for appellant.

Isador Silver, of New York City, for respondent.

*

For other cases see same topic & § number in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep’r Indexes

PER CURIAM.

The defendant did not demand judgment for the return of the chattels in his answer. Mun. Ct. Act, § 123. Therefore the court was without power to grant judgment in his favor for a return of the chattels, or in default thereof judgment for the value of the chattels against the plaintiff. Beck v. Schneider, 84 Misc. Rep. 23, 145 N. Y. Supp. 1046.

The judgment will therefore be modified, by striking therefrom those provisions, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs to either party of this appeal.
#### § 29.27 Certificate.

A certificate issued under the Act and the regulations in this subpart.
#### § 29.2504 Brown colors.

A group of colors ranging from a reddish brown to yellowish brown. These colors vary from low to medium saturation and from very low to medium brilliance. As used in these standards, the range is expressed as light brown (L), medium brown (F), and dark brown (D).
#### § 29.3607 Rule 6.

A lot of tobacco on the marginal line between two colors shall be placed in the color with which it best corresponds with respect to body or other associated elements of quality.
#### § 27.81 Fees; certificates.

For each new certificate issued in substitution for a prior certificate at the request of the holder thereof, for the purpose of business convenience, or when made necessary by the transfer of cotton under the supervision of any exchange inspection agency as provided in § 27.73, the person making the request shall pay a fee determined as described in § 27.80.

[79 FR 67318, Nov. 13, 2014]
(October 14, 1980)

#### Board of Commissioners, Rockland County Sewer District No. 1, Respondent, v Trustees of St. Patrick’s Cathedral in City of New York, Appellant.

In a condemnation proceeding, defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated September 4, 1979, which awarded it the principal sum of only $10,051.61, plus $5,462.97 interest, for three temporary and permanent easements acquired by plaintiff for the installation of sewer pipes. Judgment modified, on the law and the facts, by increasing the principal amount awarded to $11,147.75. As so modified, judgment affirmed, with costs to defendant, and matter remitted to the Supreme Court, Rockland County, for entry of an appropriate amended judgment. There is ample evidence in the record to support the determination of the trial court as to the value of the property involved in this condemnation proceeding, except insofar as credence was given to the testimony of plaintiff’s expert appraiser that each grave site had a value of $135 rather than $150. There is no justification in the record for the conclusion that the value of each site should be diminished by 10% for purported sales and administrative expenses. These expenses were already included in the valuation of each site at $150. Hopkins, J. P., Mangano, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.