alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
*Thursday, September 10, 1998*

MOTION DOCKET

97-1831.

#### Leber v. Buckeye Union Ins. Co.

Erie App. No. E-96-014. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Erie County. Upon consideration of appellee’s motion for continuance of oral argument, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for continuance of oral argument currently scheduled for September 15,1998, be, and hereby is, granted.

Resnick, J., not participating.
# North Korea:  The Foundations for Military Strength -- Update 1995

PREVIOUS

##### December 1995

----

# North Korea:  The Foundations for Military StrengthUpdate 1995

----

# Contents

Cover
Preface
**Chapter 1** -- A Post-Kim-Il-song North Korea
National Policy Goals
Regime Survival/SecurityLeadership SuccessionEconomic Development
National StructureGovernment Organization
Party Organization
Military Organization
**President Kim Il-song's Foreign Policy Legacy**Chapter 2** -- Increasing Internal PressuresEconomy
Foreign Trade
**Chapter 3** -- Strategic IssuesProliferation/Nuclear Weapons Program
Ballistic Missiles
Chemical Weapons
Biological Weapons
Transfer Technology and Acquisition
**Chapter 4** -- Military ForcesGround Forces
Organization and DispositionWeapons and Equipment
NavyOrganization and Disposition
Weapons and Equipment
**Air ForceOrganization and Disposition
Weapons and Equipment
**Air DefenseBallistic Missile ForcesSpecial Operations ForcesReserve ForcesSecurity ForcesWartime EmploymentWeapon ProductionCommand, Control, and CommunicationsTransportationLogisticsGlossary of AcronymsFigures**1. Five Largest Militaries in the World2. North Korean Government - Creation of the Korean Workers' Party3. Korean Workers' Party - The Most Important Institution in North Korea4. Military Forces Designed To Fulfill Both Defensive and Offensive Missions5. Orientation Map of Asia6.  North Korean 1994 Economic Sectors7. Producing and Exporting Arms8. Main Trading Partners9. North Korean Trade With Japan10. Orientation Map of North Korea11.  North Korea's Heavy Artillery Is Capable of Targeting Areas as Far South as Seoul12.  North Korea Army Personnel and Equipment13. The Largest of the Three Services14. Limited Navy Coastal Defense15. North Korea's Three Combat Air Commands16. SCUD Surface-to-Surface Missile17. North Korea Ballistic Missile Threat Ranges18. SCUD Missile Attack on Airfield19. Rail Support for Most Long-Distance Traffic20.Terrain Limitations to East-West Movements**PREVIOUS******
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Oakmont
Acquisition Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2005 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael C. Azar, President of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: August 26, 2005/s/ Michael C. AzarMichael C. AzarPresident (Principal Executive Officer)






14
#### In the Matter of Century Operating Corp., Respondent, v Jerome Prince, as Chairman of the New York City Conciliation and Appeals Board, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered January 11, 1979, in this article 78 proceeding granting petitioner’s application to amend an order of the respondent-appellant New York City Conciliation and Appeals Board which determined the initial legal regulated rent for an apartment, and directing the respondent-appellant to reconsider its determination on the basis of the owner’s assertion that certain apartments were comparable to the apartment in question, unanimously reversed, on the law, the petition dismissed, and the determination of the respondent-appellant reinstated, with costs and disbursements. Despite repeated notices the petitioner failed to provide the evidence of the comparability of the other apartments that is required by the respondent-appellant’s procedures. It claims that the board has no warrant to require a petitioner to submit such evidence. In applications such as this the board is required to conduct a comparability study *(Matter of Bradcord Assoc, v Conciliation & Appeals Bd. of City of N. Y.,*52 AD2d 569, affg NYU, Aug. 14, 1975, p 6, col 2), and to this end formulated the procedures it applied to the petitioner. These requirements have heretofore been reviewed and approved by this court *(Matter of Fresh Meadows Assoc, v New York City Conciliation & Appeals Bd.,*92 Mise 2d 519, affd 63 AD2d 943; *Matter of Columbia Props, v Conciliation & Appeals Bd. of City of N. Y.,*NYU, Nov. 21, 1977, p 7, col 3, affd 63 AD2d 943). Concur—Ross, J. P., Markewich, Bloom, Lynch and Carro, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Ruths Hospitality Group, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 28,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 5, 2009



By

/s/ MICHAEL P. ODONNELLMichael P. ODonnellPresident and Chief Executive Officer of Ruths Hospitality Group, Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial 
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for Prutech Research and 
                    Development Partnership III and is qualified 
                    in its entirety by reference to such 
                    financial statements
</LEGEND>

<RESTATED>          
<CIK>               0000794357
<NAME>              Prutech Research and Development Partnership III
<MULTIPLIER>        1

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1998

<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-1-1998

<PERIOD-END>                    Dec-31-1998

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-Mos

<CASH>                          1,157,931

<SECURITIES>                    73,760

<RECEIVABLES>                   0

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,231,691

<PP&E>                          0

<DEPRECIATION>                  0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,231,691

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           120,198

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      1,111,493

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,231,691

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                359,797

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                319,826

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    39,971

<EPS-PRIMARY>                   .88

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0

</TABLE>
#### PEOPLE ex rel. LAWSON, Appellant, v. LAWSON, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 27, 1906.)

Proceedings by the people of the state-*1137of New York, on the relation of William M. Lawson, against Lena L. Lawson.

No opinion. Motion denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Form
10-K report of China Resources Development, Inc. for the year ended December 31,
1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such report.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                           1,000  
<CURRENCY>                                     RENMINBI YUAN  
                                               
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1998    
<PERIOD-START>                                   JAN-01-1998    
<PERIOD-END>                                     DEC-31-1998    
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                         8.28    
<CASH>                                               129,238    
<SECURITIES>                                               0    
<RECEIVABLES>                                          8,992    
<ALLOWANCES>                                             529    
<INVENTORY>                                           10,569    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     243,188    
<PP&E>                                                12,956    
<DEPRECIATION>                                         5,713    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       370,726    
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 75,337    
<BONDS>                                                    0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0    
<PREFERRED>                                               27    
<COMMON>                                                  50    
<OTHER-SE>                                           187,368    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         370,726    
<SALES>                                              527,692    
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     538,352    
<CGS>                                                510,631    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        510,631    
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      91,471    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         0    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (63,750)    
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (63,750)    
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0    
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0    
<CHANGES>                                                  0    
<NET-INCOME>                                        (52,671)    
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (8.79)    
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (8.79)    
                                                                

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Shai Even, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Alon USA Energy, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statements of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.Date: August 11, 2006                                                       /s/ Shai Even   Shai Even   Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
#### In the Matter of Salvatore A. Bottaro, an Attorney.

A certified *987copy of judgments of conviction of Salvatore A. Bottaro, an attorney, in the County Court, Erie County, of the crimes of grand larceny, second degree, and criminal solicitation, second degree, having been presented to this court, he is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys. Present —Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Hancock, Jr., Schnepp and Witmer, JJ. (Order entered April 29, 1980.)
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Morlex, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB
      for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Miller,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/
                Michael MillerMichael
                Miller
              Principal
                Executive Officer
              Principal
                Financial Officer
              January
                30, 2008







15
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-13-0139

SAT Date: 12/11/2012

Print Date: 8/4/2014

Related cases:

 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1 2

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

2 11

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: Yes

Routes of exposure: Health: No exposures needed 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: AQUATOX-A,C

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-13-0139

FATE: 

Liquid with MP < 25 C (E)

S = Disp.

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

POTW removal (%) = 50-90 via sorption and possible partial biodeg

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk-mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = strong
PBT Potential: P2B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl - slow

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption of the low molecular weight fraction 

 is poor all routes based on physical/chemical properties. No significant health 

concerns. Low concern. 

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 68

daphnid 48-h LC50 43

green algal 96-h EC50 5.5

fish _ chronic value 13.6

daphnid _ chronic 

value

8.6

algal _ chronic 

value

1.9

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for Nonionic ; 

 pH7; liquid with unknown mp (P); effective 

concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and nominal concentrations; hardness <150.0 

mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

190

SARs Nonionic 

SAR Class Nonionic 

Ecotox Category Nonionic

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: Becky Jones
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**The undersigned officer of **Standard Aero Holdings, Inc.**hereby certifies pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to such officer’s knowledge that: 1. the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Standard Aero Holdings, Inc. for the quarterended March 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Standard Aero Holdings, Inc.Date: May15, 2007         By: /s/ Bradley Bertouille           Name: Bradley Bertouille    Title: Chief Financial Officer  The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether madebefore or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2320 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2320

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an increasingly 
  larger earned income credit for families with more than 3 children.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 11, 2013

  Mr. Nadler introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an increasingly 
  larger earned income credit for families with more than 3 children.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Tax Fairness for All Families Act of 
2013''.

SEC. 2. INCREASED EARNED INCOME CREDIT FOR FAMILIES WITH MORE THAN 3 
              CHILDREN.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 32(b) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows:
            ``(1) Percentages.--For purposes of subsection (a)--

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 The
                                                 The credit    phaseout
 ``In the case of an eligible individual with:   percentage   percentage
                                                    is:          is:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 qualifying child............................           34        15.98
2 qualifying children.........................           40        21.06
3 qualifying children.........................           45        21.06
4 qualifying children.........................           50        21.06
5 qualifying children.........................           55        21.06
6 qualifying children.........................           60        21.06
7 or more qualifying children.................           65        21.06
No qualifying children........................         7.65      7.65''.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Paragraph (3) of section 32(b) of such 
Code is amended by striking subparagraph (A).
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2012.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of George Palazzo et al., Respondents, v. Frederic S. Berman, as City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator, Appellant, and Liane Richards, Intervenor.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated July 7, 1966, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta and Rabin, JJ., concur; Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the judgment, with the following memorandum: In our opinion the facts and circumstances warranted the finding of the Administrator that the subject housing *671accommodation constitutes a part of a multiple dwelling; he therefore properly denied the issuance of a certificate of eviction (see *Matter of Amorelli*v. *Berman,*27 A D 2d 670).
§ 29.500 Fees and charges for inspection and acceptance of imported tobacco. ( a ) The fee for inspection of imported tobacco will be determined as described in § 29.123 and shall be paid by the importer. This inspection fee applies to all tobacco imported into the United States except as provided in § 29.400. Fees for services rendered shall be remitted by check or draft in accordance with a statement issued by the Director, and shall be made payable to “Agricultural Marketing Service.”
( b ) The fee for sampling, accepting, and certification of imported flue-cured and burley tobacco for prohibited pesticide residues will be determined as described in § 29.123 and shall be paid by the importer.
( c ) The fee for accepting imported flue-cured and burley tobacco not accompanied by a certification that it is free of prohibited pesticide residues will be determined as described in § 29.123. Fees for services rendered shall be remitted by check or draft in accordance with a statement issued by the Director, and shall be made payable to “Agricultural Marketing Service.”
[56 FR 34003, July 25, 1991, as amended at 58 FR 42413, Aug. 9, 1993; 79 FR 67320, Nov. 13, 2014]
##### 



Exhibit 10.6
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 to
 THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED
LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT
 for
 DISCOVERY PRODUCER SERVICES LLC
           51




---



##### 



52




---



##### 



DUKE ENERGY FIELD SERVICES, LLCBy:
    
    /s/ W. H. Easter, IIIName:
    
    W. H. Easter, IIITitle:
    
    CEO & PresidentWILLIAMS ENERGY, L.L.C.By:
    
    /s/ R. T. CronkName:
    
    R. T. CronkTitle:
    
    Vice PresidentWILLIAMS PARTNERS OPERATING LLCBy:
    
    /s/ Donald R. ChappelName:
    
    Donald R. ChappelTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer
 53