alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[108th Congress Public Law 306]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ306.108]

[[Page 118 STAT. 1131]]

Public Law 108-306
108th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To provide an additional temporary extension of programs under the Small 
   Business Act and the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 through 
     September 30, 2004, and for other purposes. <<NOTE: Sept. 24, 
                         2004 -  [H.R. 5008]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF PROGRAMS UNDER SMALL 
            BUSINESS ACT AND SMALL BUSINESS INVESTMENT ACT OF 1958.

    The authorization for any program, authority, or provision, 
including any pilot program, that was extended through June 4, 2004, by 
section 1 of Public Law 108-217 <<NOTE: Ante, p. 591.>>  is further 
extended through September 30, 2004, under the same terms and 
conditions.

SEC. 2. TECHNICAL AMENDMENT.

    Section 2 of Public Law 108-205 <<NOTE: Ante, p. 553.>>  is amended 
by striking ``October 1, 2003'' and inserting ``March 15, 2004''. The 
amendment made by the preceding sentence shall take effect as if 
included in the enactment of the section to which it relates.

SEC. 3. COMPENSATION OF AGENTS.

    Section 5 of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 634) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (g)(4), by adding at the end the 
        following:
                    ``(C) The Administration may contract with an agent 
                to carry out, on behalf of the Administration, the 
                assessment and collection of the annual fee established 
                under section 7(a)(23). The agent may receive, as 
                compensation for services, any interest earned on the 
                fee while in the control of the agent before the time at 
                which the agent is contractually required to remit the 
                fee to the Administration.''; and
            (2) in subsection (h)--
                    (A) by redesignating paragraph (2) as paragraph (3); 
                and
                    (B) by inserting after paragraph (1) the following:
            ``(2) The agent described in paragraph (1)(B) may be 
        compensated through any of the fees assessed under this section 
        and any interest earned on any funds collected by the agent 
        while such funds are in the control of the agent and before the 
        time at which the agent is contractually required to transfer

[[Page 118 STAT. 1132]]

        such funds to the Administration or to the holders of the trust 
        certificates, as appropriate.''.

    Approved September 24, 2004.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5008:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):
            Sept. 13, considered and passed House.
            Sept. 14, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 221 (Wednesday, November 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 70259]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29129]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION


Sunshine Act; Notice of Meeting

Agency Holding the Meeting: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. 
Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement: 75 FR 68788, 
Tuesday, November 9, 2010.

Previously Announced Time and Date of Meeting: Wednesday, November 17, 
2010, 10 a.m. Eastern Time.

Change in the Meeting: The meeting time has been changed to 9:30 a.m. 
Eastern Time.

Contact Person for More Information: Stephen Llewellyn, Executive 
Officer, on (202) 663-4070.

    Dated: November 15, 2010.
Stephen Llewellyn,
Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat.
    This Notice Issued November 15, 2010.
[FR Doc. 2010-29129 Filed 11-15-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6570-01-P
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 7412

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
JOHN HENRY JOHNSON , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence

. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. ( 4:17

- cr - 00108

- BHH

- 26 )

Submitted : April 29, 2021 Decided: May 12, 2021

Before KEENAN and DIAZ , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
John Henry Johnson , Appellant Pro Se. Justin William Holloway, Assistant U nited S tates Attorney , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY , Greenville, South Carolina, for Appel lee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: John Henry Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Johnson , No. 4:17

- cr - 00108

- BHH

- 26 (D.S.C. Sept. 9 , 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate ly presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.
AFFIRMED
Case 4:20-cv-00110-MW-MAF Document 9-8 Filed 04/06/20 Page 1 of 3
Case 4:20-cv-00110-MW-MAF Document 9-8 Filed 04/06/20 Page 2 of 3
Case 4:20-cv-00110-MW-MAF Document 9-8 Filed 04/06/20 Page 3 of 3
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2095 

To prohibit an increase in the lands administered by the Bureau of Land 

Management until a centralized database of all lands identified as suitable for disposal by Resource Management Plans for lands under the 

administrative jurisdiction of the Bureau is easily accessible to the public 

on a website of the Bureau. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 22, 2013 

Mr. BISHOP of Utah introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To prohibit an increase in the lands administered by the 

Bureau of Land Management until a centralized database of all lands identified as suitable for disposal by 

Resource Management Plans for lands under the administrative jurisdiction of the Bureau is easily accessible 

to the public on a website of the Bureau. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON ACQUISITION OF LAND. 

4 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This Act may be cited as the 

5 ‘‘Land Disposal Transparency and Efficiency Act’’. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2095 IH

1 (b) PROHIBITION ON ACQUISITION OF LAND.—No 

2 land or interests in land may be added by acquisition, do3 nation, transfer of administrative jurisdiction, or other4 wise to the inventory of land and interests in land adminis5 tered by the Bureau of Land Management until a central6 ized database of all lands identified as suitable for disposal 

7 by Resource Management Plans for lands under the ad8 ministrative jurisdiction of the Bureau is easily accessible 

9 to the public on a website of the Bureau. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Medina County Bar Association *v.*Muhlbach.

[Cite as *Medina Cty. Bar Assn. v. Muhlbach*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 224.]

(No. 98-721

Submitted May 27, 1998

Decided September 23, 1998.)

*225
      *Carol Conrad Reiter*and *Patricia A. Walker,*for relator.

*Per Curiam.*

We adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. As a member of the bar, respondent is expected to know the Rules for the Government of the Bar. Gov.Bar R. V(6)(E) provides that within twenty days after the mailing of the notice of a disciplinary complaint, the respondent shall file six copies of his *226or her answer and serve a copy of that answer on counsel of record named in the complaint. Although respondent mailed a “Response to Complaint” to relator on May 12, 1997, that document was not properly filed with the board after the mailing of the notice of the complaint on June 16, 1997. Respondent was therefore in default, and the board properly granted the motion for default judgment.

Respondent’s allegation that he had been advised by.relator that all charges against him had been dropped was not properly brought before the board and, even if it could be considered, does not excuse compliance with the procedural requirement of filing an answer to the complaint.

Recently, in *Lake Cty. Bar Assn. v. Vala*(1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 57, 693 N.E.2d 1083, where the board found no disciplinary violation, but found a failure to cooperate in the investigation of the grievances, we imposed a one-year suspension with the entire year stayed, during which time respondent was to be on probation. In this case, respondent’s failure to communicate promptly with the relator led to the filing of the complaint and, as in *Vala,*the needless expenditure of time and money. As we said in *Vala,*“[rjelator might not have filed this complaint had respondent been forthcoming when first advised of the grievances.” *Id.*at 59, 693 N.E.2d at 1084.

We adopt the recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law for six months with the six-month suspension stayed, during which time respondent shall be on probation, on condition that no further disciplinary complaints be certified against respondent during the probationary period. Costs taxed to respondent.

*Judgment accordingly.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# Agency Holding The Meetings:

Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

The following notice of scheduled meetings is published pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, 5 U.S.C. 552b.

# Times and Dates:

The Commission has scheduled three meetings for the following dates:

December 1 from 9:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.

December 9 from 9:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.

December 16 from 9:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.

# Place:

Three Lafayette Center, 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, Lobby Level Hearing Room (Room 1000).

# Status:

Open.

# Matters To Be Considered:

                        The Commission has scheduled these meetings to consider the issuance of various proposed rules. Agendas for each of the scheduled meetings will be made available to the public and posted on the Commission's Web site at                         *http://www.cftc.gov*                         at least seven (7) days prior to the meeting. In the event that the times or dates of the meetings change, an announcement of the change, along with the new time and place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's Web site.                    

# Additional Information:

Meeting Cancellation.

The Commission has canceled the meeting scheduled for November 30, 2010.

# Contact Person For More Information:

David A. Stawick, Secretary of the Commission, 202-418-5071.

Sauntia S. Warfield,

Assistant Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2010-29357 Filed 11-17-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
M AILING A DDRESS : U NITED A IR L INES

, I NC

., 1025 C ONNECTICUT A VENUE

, N.W., S UITE 1210, W ASHINGTON

, D.C. 20036 S TEVE M ORRISSEY M ANAGING D IRECTOR —I NTERNATIONAL & R EGULATORY A FFAIRS (202) 296-2733 (202) 296-2873 FAX

STEVE

. MORRISSEY @ UNITED

. COM

November 17, 2010

Esta Rosenberg, Chief U.S. Carrier Licensing Division U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Notice of United Air Lines, Inc. and Air China

Docket DOT-OST-2003-16213

Dear Ms. Rosenberg:

Pursuant to the blanket Statement of Author ization granted to United Air Lines, Inc. (“United”) and Air China by Notice of Acti on Taken dated October 24, 2003, United hereby notifies the Department of the expansion of its code share with Air Chin a involving the services

listed below.

 Air China’s “CA*” designator code will be placed on United-operated flights between the following city pairs:

San Francisco, CA—Orlando, FL —Pittsburgh, PA —San Diego, CA

 United’s “UA*” designator code will be placed on Air China-operated flights between the following city pairs:

Shanghai—Chongqing —Qingdao

—ShenzhenNovember 17, 2010 Page 2

United and Air China have each filed timel y applications seeking renewal of their respective exemption authorities supporting their code-share arra ngement. Both applications remain pending with the Department. Moreover, th e proposed code-share services are consistent with the U.S.-China Air Services Agreement, as amended. United and Air China plan to implement these services on or after December 20, 2010.

Respectfully submitted,

Steve Morrissey Managing Director, International & Regulatory Affairs

cc: Thuy Cooper

Service ListCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have this date se rved a copy of the foregoing document on all

persons named below by causing a copy to be sent via email:

carl.nelson@aa.com donna.kooperstein@usdoj.gov dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil howard_kass@usairways.com

dan.weiss@coair.com john.allen@faa.gov

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com urskr@state.gov

Annalei Avanceña Advisor—Regulatory Affairs

Dated: November 17, 2010
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:?  U.S. DOT/FAA - Regulatory Evaluation Form
?  Foreign Airworthiness Directive - Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information (MCAI)
?  U.S. DOT/FAA - Notice of proposed rulemaking
?  U.S. DOT/FAA - Notice of proposed rulemaking grid
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2388 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2388

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen

                                 An Act

 
 To take certain Federal lands located in El Dorado County, California, 
into trust for the benefit of the Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians, 
                         and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. LAND INTO TRUST FOR THE SHINGLE SPRINGS BAND OF MIWOK 
INDIANS.
    (a) In General.--The land described in subsection (b) is hereby 
taken into trust for the benefit of the Shingle Springs Band of Miwok 
Indians, subject to valid existing rights and management agreements 
related to easements and rights-of-way.
    (b) Land Description.--The land taken into trust pursuant to 
subsection (a) is the approximately 40.852 acres of Federal land under 
the administrative jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management 
identified as ``Conveyance boundary'' on the map titled ``Shingle 
Springs Land Conveyance/Draft'' and dated June 7, 2012, including 
improvements and appurtenances thereto.
    (c) Gaming.--Class II and class III gaming under the Indian Gaming 
Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.) shall not be permitted at any 
time on the land taken into trust pursuant to subsection (a).

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Editorial Note on Subchapter C of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter C appear by Amdt. 381, 65 FR 64586, Oct. 30, 2000.

§ 292.10 Coordinated Services Plan. ( a ) Each State Summer EBT agency must establish, and update annually as needed, a plan to coordinate the statewide availability of services offered through the Summer EBT Program described in this part and the Summer Food Service Program established in 7 CFR part 225. Each ITO Summer EBT agency is encouraged to develop a plan coordinating summer services available to the children and households they serve.
( b ) Only one plan must be established for each State in which both the Summer Food Service Program and the Summer EBT Program is administered. If more than one agency administers the Summer Food Service Program and Summer EBT within a respective State, they must work together to develop and implement the plan. States should also ensure that plans include the National School Lunch Program's Seamless Summer Program if appropriate.
( c ) The plan must include, at minimum, the following information: ( 1 ) A description of the roles and responsibilities of each Summer Food Service Program and Summer EBT agency, and, as applicable, any other agencies, ITOs, or public or private organizations which will be involved in administering the Programs;
( 2 ) A description of how the Summer EBT agency and any other organizations included in the plan will coordinate outreach and programmatic activities to maximize the reach of the Summer Food Service Program and Summer EBT Program; metrics to assess program reach and coverage; and
( 3 ) The Summer EBT agency's plans to partner with other Federal, State, Tribal, or local programs to aid participants in accessing all Federal, State, Tribal, or local programs for which they are eligible.
( d ) States must notify the public about their plan and make it available to the public through a website, and should, to the maximum extent practicable, solicit and consider input on plan development and implementation from other State agencies, ITOs, and local agencies; organizations involved in the administration of nutrition and human services programs; participants; and other stakeholders.
( e ) States must consult with FNS on the development of and any significant subsequent updates to their plan. Initial plans must be submitted to FNS no later than January 1, 2025. States must submit updates annually when significant changes are made to the plan, and otherwise no less than every 3 years.
#### KETTELTAS et al. v. INTERBOROUGH RAPID TRANSIT CO. et al.

(No. 6030.)

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July 10, 1914.)

Eminent Domain (§ 127*)—Compensation—Damage to Abutting Peopebty.

The owner of property abutting on .a street in which an elevated railroad structure is constructed is not entitled to recover for depreciation in value by reason of the construction of the structure in the street generally, especially with reference to the point below, where the structure left the street and turned into another street, where it did not substantially interfere with plaintiff’s easements.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Eminent Domain, Cent. Dig. § 348; Dec. Dig. § 127.*]

Appeal from Trial Term, New York County.

Action by Alice Ketteltas and others against the Interborough Rapid Transit Company and others. From a judgment awarding damages *518to plaintiffs with an alternative injunction if the damages are not paid, defendants appeal.

Modified and affirmed.

Argued before INGRAHAM, P. J., and McLAUGHRIN, SCOTT, DOWLING, and HOTCHKISS, JJ.

J. Osgood Nichols, of New York City, for appellants.

Isaac E. Bermant, of New York City, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Although it is stated in the decision that "the plaintiffs are not entitled to recover damages or to the award of injunctive relief in respect to such portions of defendants’ structure as are not in the portion of Pearl street directly in front of the premises in suit,” a comparison of the awards with the testimony upon which they are based indicates very clearly that this rule was not closely adhered to. In point of fact there is very little of the structure in Pearl street in front of plaintiff’s premises.

It is very probable that values in Pearl street above Coenties Slip have been seriously impaired by the erection and operation of defendants’ railroad, and that such impairment has affected values in the street generally, even below the point where the structure leaves Pearl street and turns into Coenties' Slip, and where it does not substantially interfere with plaintiffs’ easements; but for this latter impairment no damages can be recovered. The premises in suit have been allowed to fall into such a state of disrepair that some portion of the diminution of rental value must be attributed to neglect. On the whole, we are of opinion that substantial justice will be done if the fee damage is reduced to $3,025, and the rental damage to $181.50 per annum, or $1,875.50; both sums to carry interest from May 20, 1913, the date of the trial. The extra allowance must also be reduced to $245.

The judgment will, accordingly, be modified in these respects, and as modified affirmed, without costs in this court. The twenty-eighth and twenty-ninth findings of fact will be reversed, and in place thereof there will be found and inserted in the order findings of similar tenor, except as to the several amounts of damage, which shall be as above indicated. Settle order on notice.
###### Editorial Note on Subpart E of Part 301

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part appear at 87 FR 80005, Dec. 29, 2022.

#### § 301.45-9 Inspection and disposal of regulated articles and pests.

Any properly identified inspector is authorized to stop and inspect, and to seize, destroy, or otherwise dispose of, or require disposal of regulated articles, outdoor household articles, and gypsy moths as provided in sections 414, 421, and 434 of the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7714, 7731, and 7754).

[58 FR 39423, July 23, 1993, as amended at 66 FR 21050, Apr. 27, 2001]
Case 3:20-cv-04698-TKW-HTC Document 58 Filed 06/07/21 Page 1 of 1