alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 1951

#### Editorial Notes:

1. Some of the exhibits referenced in this part 1951 are not published in the Code of Federal Regulations. Exhibits are available in any Rural Development office.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1951 appear at 80 FR 9890-9894, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1951.217 Public bodies.

Servicing actions involving public bodies will be carried out to the extent feasible according to the provisions of this subpart. With prior National Office approval, the State Director is authorized to vary from such provisions if necessary and approved by OGC, provided such variation will not violate other regulatory or statutory provisions. To request approval, the case file, including copies of applicable documents, recommendations, and OGC comments, will be forwarded to the Administrator, Attention: (appropriate program division).
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Solera Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended
March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned chief executive officer and chief financial officer of the Company, certifies, to the best knowledge and
belief of the signatory, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934;
and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|/s/ Tony Aquila         |  |  |  | /s/ Dudley Mendenhall                
|Tony Aquila             |  |  |  | Dudley Mendenhall                    
|Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|                        |  | 
|Date: May 7, 2010       |  |  |  | Date: May 7, 2010
**EXHIBIT 32.2** **CERTIFICATION    OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Commercial    Lines Inc. (the “Company”) on    Form 10-Q    for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the    Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the    “Report”), I, Christopher A. Black, Chief    Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to    18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to    § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    result of operations of the Company.     /s/  CHRISTOPHER A. BLACK    Christopher A. Black    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer     May 11, 2006
2006-0052.

#### State ex rel. Poneris v. Indus. Comm.

Franklin App. No. 05AP-111, 2005-Ohio-6208.

The following cases have been returned to the regular docket pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(6)(E):
#### § 29.13 The act.

The Tobacco Inspection Act, approved August 23, 1935. (7 U.S.C. 511 *et seq.*)
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 FARMERS & MERCHANTS BANCORP, INC
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and;2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 Date:   February 25, 2011
    /s/ Barbara J. BritenrikerBarbara J. BritenrikerChief Financial Officer  87
Case 7:20-cv-00131-MCR-GRJ Document 202 Filed 04/30/21 Page 1 of 5
Case 7:20-cv-00131-MCR-GRJ Document 202 Filed 04/30/21 Page 2 of 5
Case 7:20-cv-00131-MCR-GRJ Document 202 Filed 04/30/21 Page 3 of 5
Case 7:20-cv-00131-MCR-GRJ Document 202 Filed 04/30/21 Page 4 of 5
Case 7:20-cv-00131-MCR-GRJ Document 202 Filed 04/30/21 Page 5 of 5
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document
  



 
 

Exhibit 10.14    
    


 
 

TERM SHEET    
    


        This letter sets forth the terms of Vice President, CIO that APAC Customer Services, Inc. is prepared to offer Mark E. McDermott ("Employee"). 



	

 	
 	

 
	TITLE:	 	Senior Vice President, CIO
	

LOCATION:	
 	

Deerfield
	

REPORTS TO:	
 	

Robert J. Keller, CEO
	

BASE SALARY:	
 	

$225,000 annually ($8,653.85, bi-weekly). This is stated for convenience and is not intended as an annual contract of employment
	

BONUS:	
 	

Employee is eligible to participate in APAC's annual Management Incentive Plan ("MIP") as it exists from year to year. We envision an opportunity of 10% - 40% - 80% of Base Salary for threshold-target-maximum performance, respectively. The payout of
MIP will depend on APAC meeting its budgeted financial performance and Employee meeting individual and team performance goals that will be established each year between Employee and his/her manager.
	

STOCK OPTIONS:	
 	

You have been granted options to purchase 25,000 shares of APAC common stock priced at $2.955, as evidenced by your returning your copy of the signed stock option agreement relative to such award to the Compensation Department.
	

EFFECTIVE:	
 	

April 12, 2004
	

BENEFITS:	
 	

Employee shall be eligible to participate in benefit plans available to APAC employees as summarized on the Corporate Benefit Plan Summary dated January 1, 2004 which includes; medical and dental plans, holidays, vacation, sick days, short term
and long term disability plans, life insurance plans, accident insurance, 401(k) plan, vision discount program, education assistance program, and the flexible spending accounts.
	

AGREEMENT PROTECTING THE COMPANY'S INTERESTS:	
 	

As a condition of employment Employee shall sign an appropriate Agreement Protecting Company Interests, a copy of which is enclosed.
	

OTHER:	
 	

All other benefits, terms and conditions of employment previously reviewed with Employee will apply.
	

AGREED TO:	
 	

 





	
 	
 	

 
	/s/  GAY H. SILVERSTEIN              4/12/04
Gay H.
Silverstein                (Date)

Director, Compensation, Benefits and HRIS	 	/s/  MARK E. MCDERMOTT      
Mark E. McDermott

Employee




1











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.14


TERM SHEET
```

[108th Congress Public Law 348]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ348.108]

[[Page 118 STAT. 1388]]

Public Law 108-348
108th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To authorize the Gateway Arch in St. Louis, Missouri, to be illuminated 
 by pink lights in honor of breast cancer awareness month. <<NOTE: Oct. 
                        20, 2004 -  [S. 2895]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. ILLUMINATION OF GATEWAY ARCH IN HONOR OF BREAST CANCER 
                              AWARENESS MONTH.

    In honor of breast cancer awareness month, the Secretary of the 
Interior shall authorize the Gateway Arch in St. Louis, Missouri, to be 
illuminated by pink lights for a certain period of time in October, to 
be designated by the Secretary of the Interior.

    Approved October 20, 2004.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 2895:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):
            Oct. 5, considered and passed Senate.
            Oct. 8, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
exv10wg



 






EXHIBIT 10(g)




Summary of Chief Executive Officer Annual Incentive Plan




     The Chief Executive Officer Annual Incentive Plan provides for bonus amounts to be awarded to
the Chief Executive Officer, in such amounts as are determined each year by the Compensation
Committee (the “Committee”). The total bonus award, or a portion thereof, may be earned based on
the Company achieving certain net revenue, market revenue performance, operating margin, and free
cash flow performance targets. Each year, the Compensation Committee sets a minimum goal, target
goal and maximum goal for each of these four performance targets, and determines the maximum bonus
amount which may be earned for each goal for each of the performance targets. The total bonus to
be paid will be based on the goals actually achieved for each of the four performance targets. In
the event one or more potential goals for each performance target are not achieved, the Committee
may award bonus amounts in its discretion based on the Company’s performance relative to the
pre-established performance goals and the CEO’s personal performance.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

MATHEW SELOVER,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:20-cv-04698

ESCAMBIA COUNTY BOARD OF

COUNTY COMMISSIONERS and

RAYME EDLER,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

DEFENDANT DR. RAYME EDLER'S

NOTICE OF FILING OF DOCUMENTS FROM STATE COURT ACTION

COMES NOW Defendant Rayme Edler, M.D. ("Dr. Edler"), through her undersigned

counsel, and gives this notice of the filing of the lower court documents, stating:

1. On March 11, 2020, Stephanie Pidermann, Esquire, Counsel for Co-Defendant

Escambia County Board of County Commissioners, filed a Notice of Removal. [Doc. 1] That

filing contained a complete copy of all of the documents that had been previously filed in the state

court action being removed, Exhibits "A" through "R." [Doc. 1]

2. Exhibits "A" through "R" [Doc. 1] are complete copies of all of the documents and

filings from the Circuit Court of the First Judicial Circuit of Florida, Escambia County, Case No.: 

2020-CA-000077. [Doc. 1]

3. On March 11, 2020, Co-Defendant Dr. Edler also filed her Notice of Removal in

this Court. [Doc. 2]

Case 3:20-cv-04698-TKW-HTC Document 4 Filed 03/12/20 Page 1 of 2
4. In order to avoid cluttering this Court's file and docket with duplicate copies of

documents previously filed, pursuant to Rule 10(c), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant

Dr. Edler incorporates Exhibits "A" through "R" [Doc. 1] into her Notice of Removal [Doc. 2],

by reference.

5. If the Court desires, Dr. Edler will refile all previous lower court pleadings and

documents in support of her Removal.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that I have served a copy of the foregoing by filing it with the

Clerk of Court via the E-Portal System, which automatically serves a copy on parties who have

appeared in this matter; on this 11th day of March 2020.

/s/ George F. Indest III

____________________________________

GEORGE F. INDEST III, J.D., M.P.A., LL.M.

Florida Bar No.: 382426

Primary e-mail: GIndest@TheHealthLawFirm.com

Secondary e-mail: CourtFilings@TheHealthLawFirm.com

ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT,

RAYME EDLER, M.D.

GFI/sg

S:\2500-2599\2531\002\410-Pleadings-Drafts & Finals-Fed\Notice of Filing Documents.wpd

- 2 -

Case 3:20-cv-04698-TKW-HTC Document 4 Filed 03/12/20 Page 2 of 2
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION
 CERTIFICATION OF DR. RALPH S. CUNNINGHAM, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF EPE HOLDINGS, LLC, THE GENERAL PARTNER OF
ENTERPRISE GP HOLDINGS L.P.
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 /s/ Dr. Ralph S. CunninghamName:
    
    Dr. Ralph S. CunninghamTitle:
    
    Chief Executive Officer of EPE Holdings, LLC
on behalf of Enterprise GP Holdings L.P.Date: November 9, 2007
#### Cleveland Bar Association *v.*Allanson.

[Cite as *Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Allanson*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 304.]

(No. 98-753

Submitted June 10, 1998

Decided September 30, 1998.)

*305
      *Martin J. Murphy*and *Cathleen M. Bolek,*for relator.

*Per Curiam.*

We adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. Respondent’s failure to pursue his clients’ interests, his misrepresentation to U’Ren about the status of a claim, and his failure both in this instance and on previous occasions to cooperate in relator’s investigation warrant the suspension. We *306therefore adopt the recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law. Costs taxed to respondent.

*Judgment accordingly.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCTS

Case No. 3:19md2885

LIABILITY LITIGATION

This Document Relates to: 

Adkins, 7:20cv012

Judge M. Casey Rodgers

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones

DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS ORDER NO. 1

This Order addresses Defendants’ objections and counter-designations to 

Plaintiff’s affirmative deposition designations and Plaintiff’s objections to 

Defendants’ counter-designations thereto for the following witness depositions:

1. Hamer, Jeff (2015-10-07)

2. Kieper, Ron (2019-12-20)

3. Manuel, Jose (2020-11-03)

4. Salon, Martin (2020-1-29)

5. Van Densen, Mark (2020-12-04)

6. Warren, Gary (2020-01-23)

SO ORDERED this 7th day of September, 2021.

M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 7:20-cv-00012-MCR-GRJ Document 79 Filed 09/07/21 Page 1 of 1
Minutes from 9‐18‐2015 Meeting Between EPA and ADAMA, the Novaluron Technical

Registrant

Meeting Minutes

Office of Pesticide Programs

Pesticide Re‐Evaluation Division RMIB II/ADAMA

EPA Offices, Arlington, VA

Tuesday, August 18, 2015

Re: Novaluron (EPA PC Code 124002)

ADAMA Participants:

Ephi Gur ‐ADAMA Consultant

Rob Everich ‐ ADAMA Consultant  

Laura Phelps ‐ Regulatory Manager

EPA Participants:

Greg Orrick, Environmental Risk Branch I, Risk Assessment Process Leader

Kristina Garber, Environmental Risk Branch I Senior Advisor  

Ryan Mroz, Environmental Risk Branch I, Biologist

He Zhong, Environmental Fate and Effects Division

Tom Myers, Pesticide Re‐Evaluation Division, Team Lead

Margaret Hathaway, Chemical Review Manager, Pesticide Re‐Evaluation Division

Sujatha Sankula, Environmental Risk Branch I, Branch Chief

Novaluron Registrant Meeting.  On Tuesday, August 18, 2015, representatives from ADAMA, the

novaluron technical registrant, visited OPP’s office for a discussion of pending data requirements to be

included in the novaluron Final Work Plan and accompanying Data Call‐In.  Data requirements are being

proposed for the parent compound novaluron as well as degradates chlorophenyl urea and

chloroaniline.

Novaluron is an insect growth regulator used for the control of insects on field crops; on ornamentals

and food crops which are container or field‐grown in greenhouses, shadehouses, and nurseries; in post‐

harvest fruit treatments; in seed treatments; in anti‐mosquito larvacidal pellets; as a cricket control

inside and near buildings; on dog collars; and as a spot use on turf/lawns.  It affects the immature

growth stages of the target pests.  The Agency plans to conduct a full ecological risk assessment as well

as spray drift and volatilization assessments.

The meeting was called to order by Margaret Hathaway, who stated that the purpose of the meeting

was to discuss with ADAMA the studies and data associated with the upcoming Novaluron Data‐Call‐In.
ADAMA gave a presentation to EPA discussing the metabolites and pathway of novaluron degredation

as well as the toxicity profile of novaluron.  It was noted that ADAMA is a member of both the Federal

Endangered Species Task Force and the Generic Endangered Species Task Force.

ADAMA’s presentation was followed by a discussion reviewing the Agency’s proposed data needs for

novaluron, including pollinator data.  ADAMA indicated that they have already completed various

studies they can supply to EPA for review.

Next Steps: EPA plans to issue a Final Work Plan (FWP) in September 2015.  At that time, a draft Data‐

Call‐In will also be submitted for OMB approval.  Once finalized, the FWP and Data‐Call‐In will both be

publically available in the novlauron Registration Review docket (EPA‐HQ‐OPP‐2015‐0171) on

Regulations.gov.
OAO 247 (02/08) Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

United States of America )

)

)

)

)

)

v.

KENNETH B. NICKSON Case No: 3:97cr99-07/RV

USM No: 04493-017

Date of Previous Judgment: February 26, 1999 Thomas S. Keith, Assistant Federal Public Defender

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Applicable) Defendant’s Attorney

Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

Upon motion of X the defendant 9 the Director of the Bureau of Prisons 9 the court under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has

subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 994(u), and having considered such motion,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:

9 DENIED. X GRANTED and the defendant’s previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in 

the last judgment issued) of 200 months is reduced to 160 months .

I. COURT DETERMINATION OF GUIDELINE RANGE (Prior to Any Departures)

Previous Offense Level: 36 Amended Offense Level: 34

Criminal History Category: I Criminal History Category: I

Previous Guideline Range: 188 to 235 months Amended Guideline Range: 151 to 188 months

II. SENTENCE RELATIVE TO AMENDED GUIDELINE RANGE

X The reduced sentence is within the amended guideline range.

9 The previous term of imprisonment imposed was less than the guideline range applicable to the defendant at the time

of sentencing as a result of a departure or Rule 35 reduction, and the reduced sentence is comparably less than the

amended guideline range.

9 Other (explain):

III. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

Except as provided above, all provisions of the judgment dated February 26, 1999, shall remain in effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Order Date: April 8, 2009 /s/ Roger Vinson

Judge’s signature

Effective Date: Roger Vinson, Senior U.S. District Judge

(if different from order date) Printed name and title

Case 3:97-cr-00099-RV Document 353 Filed 04/08/09 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1








                          Consent of Ernst & Young LLP


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8, File No. 33-40184) pertaining to the 1982 Incentive Stock Option
Plan and the 1989 Incentive Stock Option Plan of JONES PHARMA INCORPORATED and
the Registration Statement (Form S-8, File No. 333-15879) pertaining to the
1994 Formula Stock Option Plan for Non-Management Directors and the 1994
Incentive Stock Plan of JONES PHARMA INCORPORATED of our report dated January
31, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
JONES PHARMA INCORPORATED included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended December 31, 1999.


St. Louis, Missouri
March 17, 2000
#### In the Matter of Babylon Union Free School District, Respondent, v Frank Arena, as President of the Babylon Teachers Association, et al., Appellants.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to stay arbitration, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated March 20, 1979, which, *inter alia,*granted the application. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements (see *Matter of Babylon Union Free School Dist. v Arena,*59 AD2d 760, 761). Mollen, P. J., Gibbons, Martuscello and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:96cr86-01/LAC

OWEN DUCKWORTH

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on March 9, 2010 

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION REQUESTING EARLY TERMINATION OF PROBATION 

Filed by DEFENDANT on 2/16/2010 Doc.# 59 

RESPONSES:

 NONE on Doc.# 

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

 Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Jerry Marbut

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Jerry Marbut

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 11 day of

th

March, 2010, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) The Court will not consider early termination unless it is brought forward

by the supervising probation officer.

s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 1:88-cr-01007-MP-AK

WILLIE BUD REED, JR,

Defendant.

___________________________/

O R D E R 

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 1047, Motion for Reconsideration of this Court's

Order, Doc. 1046, denying Defendant's Motion for Return of Property, Doc. 1014. Upon review

of Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration, the Court finds no legal reason to reconsider its prior

Order.

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration, Doc. 1047, is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of June, 2005.

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:88-cr-01007-MW-GRJ Document 1048 Filed 06/09/05 Page 1 of 1