### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o
. 0 9

- 6 0 8 3 2 S u m m a r y C a l e n d a r

M A R X A L L R

. C A M P O S , P e t i t i o n e r

v
. E R I C H

. H O L D E R , J R

. , U

. S

. A T T O R N E Y G E N E R A L , R e s p o n d e n t

P e t i t i o n f

o r R e v i e w o f a n O r d e r o f t h e B o a r d o f I m m i g r a t i o n A p p e a l s B I A N o
. A 0 4 1 7 4 3 2 9 0

B e f o r e K I N G , D E M O S S , a n d D E N N I S , C i r c u i t J u d g e s P E R C U R I A M : *
M a r x a l l R

. C a m p o s , a c i t i z e n a n d n a t i v e o f t h e D o m i n i c a n R e p u b l i c , p e t i t i o n s t h i s c o u r t f o r r e v i e w o f t h e o r d e r i s s u e d b y t h e B o a r d o f I m m i g r a t i o n A p p e a l s ’ ( B I A ) a f

f i r m i n g t h e I m m i g r a t i o n J u d g e ’ s ( I J ’ s ) d e t e r m i n a t i o n t h a t h e

w a s i n e l i g i b l e f

o r c a n c e l l a t i o n o f r e m o v a l

. R e l y i n g o n C a r a c h u r i

- R o s e n d o v
. H o l d e r , 5 7 0 F

. 3 d 2 6 3 ( 5 t h C i r
. 2 0 0 9 ) ,
r e v e r s e d ,

_ _ _ S

. C t

.

_ _ _ , 2 0 1 0 W L 2 3 4 6 5 5 2 ( U

. S

. J u n e 1 4 , 2 0 1 0 ) ; U n i t e d S t a t e s

v
. C e p e d a - R i o s , 5 3 0 F

. 3 d 3 3 3 ( 5 t h C i r
. 2 0 0 8 ) , a n d U n i t e d S t a t e s v
. S a n c h e z U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D July 16, 2 010 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 09-60832 Document: 00511176652 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/16/2010N o
. 0 9

- 6 0 8 3 2

V i l l a l o b o s , 4 1 2 F

. 3 d 5 7 2 ( 2 0 0 5 ) , a b r o g a t e d i n p a r t b y L o p e z v
. G o n z a l e s , 5 4 9 U

. S

. 4 7 , 5 8

- 6 0 ( 2 0 0 6 ) , t h e B I A h e l d t h a t C a m p o s ’ s s e c o n d m i s d e m e a n o r c r i m i n a l
p o s s e s s i o n o f

c o c a i n e c o n s t i t u t e d a n a g g r a v a t e d f e l o n y b e c a u s e i t c o r r e s p o n d e d
t o t h e r e c i d i v i s t p r o v i s i o n s o f 2 1 U

. S

. C

. § 8 4 4 ( a )

. T h e S u p r e m e C o u r t h a s s i n c e

r e v e r s e d C a r a c h u r i

- R o s e n d o , r e j e c t i n g t h i s c o u r t ’ s “ h y p o t h e t i c a l a p p r o a c h ” a n d h o l d i n g t h a t “ t h e d e f e n d a n t m u s t

. . . h a v e b e e n a c t u a l l y c o n v i c t e d o f a c r i m e t h a t i s i t s e l f p u n i s h a b l e a s a f e l o n y u n d e r f e d e r a l l a w
. ” C a r a c h u r i

- R o s e n d o , 2 0 1 0 W L 2 3 4 6 5 5 2 , * 1 1

. A s i n C a r a c h u r i

- R o s e n d o , C a m p o s w a s n o t a c t u a l l y

c o n v i c t e d u n d e r t h e s t a t e r e c i d i v i s t s t a t u t e
. I n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h t h e S u p r e m e C o u r t ’ s r u l i n g , C a m p o s ’ s p e t i t i o n f o r r e v i e w i s G R A N T E D a n d t h e o r d e r o f t h e B I A i s V A C A T E D a n d R E M A N D E D

.

2 Case: 09-60832 Document: 00511176652 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/16/2010