alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 221 (Wednesday, November 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 70363]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28952]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Thrift Supervision

[AC-54: OTS No. H-4752]


Alliance Bancorp, Inc. of Pennsylvania, Broomall, PA; Approval of 
Conversion Application

    Notice is hereby given that on November 10, 2010, the Office of 
Thrift Supervision approved the application of Alliance Mutual Holding 
Company and Greater Delaware Valley Savings Bank, dba Alliance Bank, 
Broomall, Pennsylvania, to convert to the stock form of organization. 
Copies of the application are available for inspection by appointment 
(phone number: 202-906-5922 or e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a4f4d1c6c8cdc78aedcac2cbe4ebf0f78af0d6c1c5d78ac3cbd2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="19496c7b75707a3750777f7659564d4a374d6b7c786a377e766f">[email protected]</span></a>) at the 
Public Reading Room, 1700 G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20552, and the 
OTS Northeast Regional Office, Harborside Financial Center Plaza Five, 
Suite 1600, Jersey City, New Jersey 07311.


    Dated: November 10, 2010.

    By the Office of Thrift Supervision.
Sandra E. Evans,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2010-28952 Filed 11-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6720-01-M


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE, ACCOUNTING AND

FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Western GamingCorporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2005, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I DeAnn Moore, Secretary/Treasurer of the Company, hereby certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   (1)  the Report fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

   (2)  the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/DeAnn MooreDeAnn MooreSecretary/TreasurerAugust 8, 2005
#### The State ex rel. Moore, Appellant, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Moore v. Indus. Comm.*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 378.]

(No. 97-1533

Submitted August 19, 1998

Decided October 14, 1998.)

*379
      *Harris & Burgin*and *Denise L. Devney,*for appellant.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Steven P. Fixler,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Douglas, J., dissents.
118 STAT. 1270 PUBLIC LAW 108–326—OCT. 16, 2004

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 982:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 108–102, Pt. 1 (Comm. on the Judiciary) and Pt. 2

(Comm. on Resources).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:

Vol. 149 (2003): Nov. 4, considered and passed House.

Vol. 150 (2004): Sept. 29, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 108–326

108th Congress

An Act

To clarify the tax treatment of bonds and other obligations issued by the Government

of American Samoa.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF TAX TREATMENT OF BONDS AND

OTHER OBLIGATIONS ISSUED BY GOVERNMENT OF

AMERICAN SAMOA.

(a) EXEMPTION OF ALL BONDS FROM INCOME TAXATION BY STATE

AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS.—Subsection (b) of section 202 of Public

Law 98–454 (48 U.S.C. 1670) is amended to read as follows:

‘‘(b) EXEMPTION OF ALL BONDS FROM INCOME TAXATION BY

STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS.—

‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The interest on any bond or other obligation issued by or on behalf of the Government of American

Samoa shall be exempt from taxation by the Government of

American Samoa and the governments of any of the several

States, the District of Columbia, any territory or possession

of the United States, and any subdivision thereof.

‘‘(2) EXEMPTION APPLICABLE ONLY TO INCOME TAXES.—The

exemption provided by paragraph (1) shall not apply to gift,

estate, inheritance, legacy, succession, or other wealth transfer

taxes.’’.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

This Act shall apply to obligations issued after the date of

the enactment of this Act.

Approved October 16, 2004.

48 USC 1670

note.

Oct. 16, 2004

[H.R. 982]
Exhibit 10.9


Current Director Fee Arrangements


       Directors of Great Southern Bancorp, Inc. ("Bancorp") receive a monthly fee of $750,
which is the only compensation paid to directors by Bancorp, except for stock options which may
be granted in the discretion of the Board of Directors under Bancorp's 2003 Stock Option and
Incentive Plan. Directors of Great Southern Bank receive a monthly fee of $1,750.  The directors
of Bancorp and the directors of the Bank are the same individuals.  As the sole director of Great
Southern Financial Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Bank, William V. Turner, the
Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company and the Bank, receives a monthly fee of
$600 for his service on that board.  The directors of Bancorp and its subsidiaries are not paid any
fees for committee service and are not reimbursed for their costs incurred in attending Board and
committee meetings.
• 

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 

520 Lafayette Road North I St. Paul, MN 55155-4194 I 651-296-6300 I 1-800-657-3864 I 651-282-5332 TTY I www.pca.state.mn.us 

August 29, 2008 

. To: Motor Vehicle Manufacturers 

RE: Reporting Leakage Rates of HFC-134a from Mobile Air Conditioners 

This letter is to infonn you of a new reporting requirement in the State of Minnesota. As you may know, 

the State of Minnesota has developed greenhouse gas reduction goals (Minn. Stat. 216H.02, subd. 1). One 

component ofthe reduction goals is to provide consumers with infonnation regarding emissions of gases 

that have a high global-wanning potential. 

Legislation passed in early 2008 (Minn. Stat. 216H.12) requires reporting of leakage rates from motor 

vehicle air conditioners using HFC-134a (CAS Number 811-97-2) as a refrigerant. Other names for this 

chemical are Genetron 134a, R-134a, Freon 134a, or Norflurane. 

This law applies to new vehicles that are to be sold in Minnesota on or after January 1, 2009.
 

Manufacturers must report the leakage rate of refrigerant to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
 

(MPCA) at least 90 days before the first date the vehicle is offered for sale.
 

This reporting requirement applfes to light duty vehicles (up to 8,500 Ibs. gross vehicle weight rating 

[GVWRD and medium duty passenger vehicles (up to 10,000 Ibs. GVWR) and includes model year 2009 

and later. The MPCA will accept aggregated data for groups of vehicles with similar air conditioner 

systems as described in the instructions for the reporting fonn. 

The Mobile Air Conditioner Leakage Rate report form, which is an Excel spreadsheet, will be available 

on the MPCA's Web site as of September 8, 2008, at www.pca.state.mn.us/climatechange/mobileair.html. 

Submit completed reports bye-mail tomac.hgwp@pca.state.mn.us or to Barbara Jean Conti, MPCA, 

520 Lafayette Road North, St. Paul, MN 55155. 

Please note that the leakage rate must be calculated using SAE International document J2727, HFC-134a 

Mobile Air Conditioning System Emission Chart. Manufacturers have the option of also submitting 

supplemental data using other test methods in addition to the mandatory SAE J2727 calculations. 

For further infonnation or if you have questions, please contact me at barbara.conti@state.mn.us or 

651-296-6703. This telephone number is valid until October 2008, when the MPCA will implement a new 

telephone system. You may also call the MPCA's switchboard as that telephone number will remain the 

same, at 651-296-6300 or 800-657-3864, or check the Web site for updated contact infonnation. 

Sincerely, 

~]~).Jv~~~~ C<mtBarbara Jean Conti
 

Project Manager
 

Air Assessment and Environmental Data Management Section
 

Environmental Analysis and Outcomes Division
 

BJC:jrh 

St. Paul I Brainerd I Detroit Lakes I Duluth I Mankato I Marshall I Rochester I Willmar I Printed on 100% post-consumer recycled paper
#### § 29.3034 Leaf scrap.

A by-product of unstemmed tobacco. Leaf scrap results from handling unstemmed tobacco and consists of loose and tangled whole or broken leaves.

[24 FR 8771, Oct. 29, 1959. Redesignated at 49 FR 16758, Apr. 20, 1984]
Page 1 of 2 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENSACOLA DIVISION 

CRAIG LAMONT RUCKER, 

Inmate No. X13105, 

 Plaintiff, 

vs. Case No.: 3:19cv3514/RV/EMT 

SERGEANT DAVIDSON, 

 Defendant. 

__________________________/ 

ORDER

 The chief magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on 

September 8, 2020 (ECF No. 26). The parties were furnished a copy of the Report 

and Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 

28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed. 

 Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined the 

Report and Recommendation should be adopted. 

 Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 

 1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 

26) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 

2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as malicious 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). 

Case 3:19-cv-03514-RV-EMT Document 30 Filed 11/06/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2 

Case No. 3:19cv3514/RV/EMT 

3. The defendant’s motion for extension of time to complete discovery 

(doc. 29) is DENIED, as moot. 

3. The clerk of court shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 6th day of November, 2020. 

 /s/ Roger Vinson 

 ROGER VINSON 

 SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:19-cv-03514-RV-EMT Document 30 Filed 11/06/20 Page 2 of 2
(April 9, 1980)

#### In the Matter of Elm Realty, Inc., et al., Appellants, v Office of Rent Control, Respondent.

On the court’s own motion, its decision and order, both dated May 8, 1978, are hereby amended to provide that the same shall be entered *nunc pro tunc*in this court as of April 24, 1978—the date of the submission of the appeal to this court, the petitioner, Peter D. Visco, having died on April 28, 1978 (see *Kaye v Associated Metals & Mins. Corp.,*18 AD2d 1014; *Russell v Butler Grocery Co.,*240 App Div 31). Hopkins, J. P., Cohalan, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
EX-10.43






PLATO LEARNING, INC.




BOARD OF DIRECTORS




DIRECTORS COMPENSATION PLAN




At the January 18, 2005 Board of Directors Meeting, the Board approved compensation for
outside Directors as follows.



Stock Option Grant and Cash Payment — New Directors Initiation:




	 	•	 	15,000 Stock Options Grant @ FMV as of close of business on the date of election to the
Board of Directors to vest immediately.






	 	•	 	Prorated Cash payment ($20,000/12 X number of months remaining until the next Annual
Meeting).





Restricted Stock Award, Stock Option Grant & Cash Payment — Continuing Directors Annual
Retainer & Meeting Preparations:




	 	•	 	1,000 shares Restricted Stock Award @ FMV as of close of business on the date of the Annual
Meeting to vest immediately with restrictions to lapse the earlier of five years, retirement
or resignation from the Board of Directors [relates to director year going forward].






	 	•	 	10,000 Stock Options Grant @ FMV as of close of business on the date of the Annual Meeting
to vest immediately [relates to director year going forward].






	 	•	 	$20,000 to be paid as soon as possible after the date of the Annual Meeting (except to
Non-Employee Chairman of the Board, see below) [relates to director year going forward].





Cash and Stock Option Grant — for Non-Employee Chairman of the Board:




	 	•	 	5,000 Stock Options Grant (in addition to the 10,000 grant as listed above) @ FMV as of
close of business on the date of the Annual Meeting to vest immediately [relates to director
year going forward].






	 	•	 	$30,000 to be paid as soon as possible after the date of the Annual Meeting (in place of
the $20,000 as listed above) [relates to director year going forward].





Stock Option Grant — for Committee Chairs:




	 	•	 	1,500 Stock Options Grant @ FMV as of close of business on the date of the Annual Meeting
to vest immediately [relates to director year going forward].





	 	 	 
	Cash Payment — for Board and Committee Meeting Attendance:

	 
	 	 
	 









	 	•	 	$1,500 fee for each Board Meeting attended [relates to director year going forward].






	 	•	 	$1,250 fee to the Committee Chairs (except Audit Committee Chair meeting fee is $2,000),
and $750 fee to Committee Members, for each Committee Meeting attended by each.
	 
	 	 	 	Other
—






	 	•	 	Chairman of the Board has the option to recommend an additional stock option grant based on
the Company’s performance and achievement of goals.






	 	•	 	Chairman of the Board has the option to request a prorated refund of stock options granted
or cash payments made to a Board Member who elects to resign at a time other than at the
Annual Meeting.






	 	•	 	All travel and business expenses relating to meeting attendance or to conduct business on
behalf of PLATO Learning are reimbursed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-60208

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ONE BEIGE/WHITE 1996 FORD F250 PICKUP TRUCK, VIN

1FTHX26F6TEA73788; ET AL.,

Defendants,

CATHERINE Y. NEWELL, President of Cottage Gift and Garden,

Inc; C. D. NEWELL, JR.,

Claimants-Appellants.

THE COTTAGE GIFT AND GARDEN, INC.,

Appellant.

--------------------------------------------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:99-CV-44-LN

-------------------------------------------------------

December 14, 2000

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges:

PER CURIAM: *

On February 28, 2000, the district court entered a final judgment of forfeiture with regard to

the defendant properties: one Beige/White 1996 Ford F250 Pickup Truck, VIN2

1FTHX26F6TEA73788; one Kubota farm tractor, Model No. M858ODT, SN60148; and one Kubota

Farm Tractor, Model No. 3L4200DT, SN 50752. Summary judgment was entered because the

district court found that the defendant properties were involved in or traceable to a money laundering

offense in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956, thereby subjecting them to forfeiture pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

§ 981. The claimants, C.D. Newell, Jr., and Catherine Y. Newell, president of The Cottage Gift and

Garden, Inc., appeal the summary judgment on the basis that the Government failed to establish the

requisite probable cause.

In a civil forfeiture case, the initial burden rests with the Government to demonstrate that

probable cause exists for the belief that a substantial connection exists between the property sought

to be forfeited and the illegal activity. United States v. 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme 2 Door,

Vin # 1G3WR14W5JD323281

, 983 F.2d 670, 674 (5th Cir. 1993). The Government may prove the

requisite probable cause by both circumstantial and hearsay evidence. U nited State s v.

$9,041,598.68 , 163 F.3d 238, 246 (5th Cir. 1998), cert. denied , 527 U.S. 1023 (1999). The proof

of probable cause is satisfied when there is “a reasonable ground for belief

. . . supported by less than

prima facie proof but more than mere suspicion.” U nited States v. One 1986 Nissan Maxima GL

, 895

F. 2 d 1063, 1064 (5th Cir. 1990). If unrebutted, a showing of probable cause alone will support a

forfeiture. 1988 Oldsmobile Cutlass , 983 F.2d at 675.

Our de novo review of the summary judgment evidence indicates that the Government carried

its burden of proving probable cause to support the forfeiture of the defendant properties. Because

the Government’s showing of probable cause was unrebutted by the claimants, the judgment of the

district court is AFFIRMED.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1980

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1980 appear at 80 FR 9905, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1980.404 [Reserved]
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2323 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2323

 To amend the Equal Credit Opportunity Act to repeal a small business 
                   loan data collection requirement.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 11, 2013

Mr. Pittenger introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Equal Credit Opportunity Act to repeal a small business 
                   loan data collection requirement.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Right to Lend Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. SMALL BUSINESS LOAN DATA COLLECTION REQUIREMENT.

    (a) Repeal.--Section 704B of the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (15 
U.S.C. 1691c-2) is repealed.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Section 701(b) of the Equal Credit 
Opportunity Act (15 U.S.C. 1691(b)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (3), by inserting ``or'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (4), by striking ``; or'' and inserting a 
        period; and
            (3) by striking paragraph (5).
    (c) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for title VII of the 
Consumer Credit Protection Act is amended by striking the item relating 
to section 704B.
                                 <all>
```
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 25, 2011

t0418 

# Order

April 25, 2011

142411

JAMES STEVENSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 142411 COA: 299087 WCAC: 09-000157 GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 1, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
Schedule of Director Compensation Arrangements


 Exhibit 10.10 
  
  
 TRICO MARINE SERVICES, INC. 

 
 Board and Committee Compensation 
  

											
	 	 	 All Directors Except
Chairman

	 	 Chairman of the Board

	 	 Chairman of Audit

	 	 Chairman of
Nominating &
Corporate Governance

	 	 Chairman of
Compensation


	 Fees:
	 	$25,000 per year payable quarterly in advance (4 installments of $6,250 each)	 	$20,000 per month payable monthly in advance	 	$20,000 per year payable quarterly in advance (4 installments of $5,000 each)	 	$5,000 per year payable quarterly in advance (4 installments of $1,250 each)	 	$5,000 per year payable quarterly in advance (4 installments of $1,250 each)

  
 Meeting fees: $1,500 per meeting,
including committee meetings and telephonic attendance 
  
 Initial Share Grant:
5,000 restricted shares for initial grant on Effective Date of bankruptcy exit 
  
 Annual Share/Option Grant: to be determined from time to time by the Board of Directors for award, concurrent with the annual shareholder’s meeting, for the Chairman of the Board and the other non-management directors 
  
 International Travel: international travel to and from board and committee meetings (for
committee members) occurring on or about the same dates will be compensated as a single additional meeting
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Sang Park, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 9, 2007



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|                                    
|/s/ Sang Park                       
|Sang Park                           
|Chief Executive Officer and Chairman