alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

Aerospace Metals, Inc., a Delaware corporation
American Scrap Processing, Inc., an Illinois corporation
California Metals Recycling, Inc., a California corporation
CIM Trucking, Inc., an Illinois corporation
Cometco Corp., an Illinois corporation
Cozzi Building Corporation, an Illinois corporation
Cozzi Iron & Metal, Inc., an Illinois corporation
C Shredding Corp., an Illinois corporation
EMCO Trading, Inc., an Arizona corporation
Ferrex Trading Corporation, a Delaware corporation
Firma, Inc., a California corporation
Firma Plastic Co., Inc., a California corporation
FPX, Inc., a Tennessee corporation
Houston Compressed Steel Corp., a Texas corporation
HouTex Metals Company, Inc., a Texas corporation
The Isaac Corporation, an Ohio corporation
Kankakee Scrap Corporation, an Illinois corporation
Kimerling Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation
Mac Leod Metals Co., a California corporation
Metal Management Arizona, Inc., an Arizona corporation
Metal Management Gulf Coast, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Metal Management Pittsburgh, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Metal Management Realty, Inc., an Arizona corporation
Michael Schiavone & Sons, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Naporano Iron & Metal Co., a New Jersey corporation
Newell Recycling West, Inc., a Colorado corporation
NIMCO Shredding Co., a New Jersey corporation
138 Scrap, Inc., an Illinois corporation
PerlCo, L.L.C., a Tennessee limited liability company
P. Joseph Iron & Metal, Inc., an Ohio corporation
Proler Southwest Inc., a Texas corporation
Proler Steelworks L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company
R&P Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Reserve Iron & Metal Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership
Salt River Recycling, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company
Scrap Processing, Inc., an Illinois corporation
Torrington Scrap Company, a Delaware corporation
Trojan Trading Co., a California corporation
USA Southwestern Carrier, Inc., an Arizona corporation
[491O-I3_P]

DEPARTMENT OF TRAJ'ISPORTATION Federal AviationAdministration ONCURRENCES OUTING SYMBOL 

## -1 INITIALS'S'G

o

# q ;)3 

# IV
ROUTI '0 SYM L 

# ~ro 'NInALgJ\lG 

### A-~1Wv'1 Series Airplanes 14CFR Part 39 

## C-r,..&.- DATF. [Docket 

### N9L FAA-201 0-0639; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-232-AD; Amendmen qo

# jJ If

# I{'J \' n

# U" 7 "'0"" "" C 39- 

### If.

# AD 2010-**-**1 . 

# Ji,/I'f-IN , .1.--\- 

# o? INITIALSISIG RiN 2I20-AA64 J 

## NJu,-- Airworthiness Directives; McDonnell Douglas Corporation Model DC-8-31, DC-8-32 

# 1

DC-8-61 Series Airplanes; Model DC-8-70 Series Airplanes; and Model DC-8-70F AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department ofTransportation DC-8-33, DC-8-41, DC-8-42, and DC-8-43 Airplanes; Model DC-8-50 Series Airplal1~;- Model DC-SF-54 and DC-SF-55 Airplanes; Model DC-8-60 Series Airplanes; Model

(DOT). ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding an existing ainvorthiness directive (AD) that 'NITlAL5IS'G applies to all oftbe McDonnell Douglas Corporation airplanes identified above. The existing AD cunently requires revising the maintenance program to incorporate new ROUTINGiin,OOL auwortbiness limitations for fuel tank systems to satisfy Special Federal Aviation INITIAlS'SlG Regulation No. 88 requirements. This new AD adds requirements to revise the maintenance program to incorporate specific Critical DesIgn Configuration Control ROUTING WMROL Limitations (CDCCL) infonnation and install fueltank float switch in-line fuses. This new AD also adds two Airworthiness Limitations inspections (ALIs). This AD results DATE from adesign review ofthe fueltank systems. We are issuing this AD to prevent the potential for ignition sources inside fuel tanks caused by latent failures, alterations, I~ITIALS"'O repairs, ormaintenance actions, which, incombination with flammable fuel vapors, co result in afuel tank explosion and consequent loss ofthe airplane.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2388 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2388

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            December 9, 2013

  Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To take certain Federal lands located in El Dorado County, California, 
    into trust for the benefit of the Shingle Springs Band of Miwok 
                    Indians, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAND INTO TRUST FOR THE SHINGLE SPRINGS BAND OF MIWOK 
              INDIANS.

    (a) In General.--The land described in subsection (b) is hereby 
taken into trust for the benefit of the Shingle Springs Band of Miwok 
Indians, subject to valid existing rights and management agreements 
related to easements and rights-of-way.
    (b) Land Description.--The land taken into trust pursuant to 
subsection (a) is the approximately 40.852 acres of Federal land under 
the administrative jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management 
identified as ``Conveyance boundary'' on the map titled ``Shingle 
Springs Land Conveyance/Draft'' and dated June 7, 2012, including 
improvements and appurtenances thereto.
    (c) Gaming.--Class II and class III gaming under the Indian Gaming 
Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.) shall not be permitted at any 
time on the land taken into trust pursuant to subsection (a).

            Passed the House of Representatives December 3, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION IX

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

October 15, 2014

Teec Nos Pos Chapter, Navajo Nation Reservation

P.O. Box 106

Teecnospos, AZ 86514

ATTN: ADMIN OFFICE

Subject: Request to retain public documents at the Teec Nos Pos Chapter for public

inspection

To Whom It May Concern:

The purpose of this letter is to request that the Teec Nos Pos Chapter of the Navajo Nation Reservation

retain the enclosed documents at the Teec Nos Pos Chapter House for at least sixty (60) days for public

inspection. These documents are the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency’s preliminary decision

for the proposed Clean Air Act Prevention of Significant Deterioration amendment permit for the

McElmo Creek Unit Oil Production Facility on the Navajo Nation Indian Reservation near the city of

Aneth, San Juan County, Utah. These documents are currently available for public comment.

Please contact me at (415) 947-4156 or kelly.shtheerah~~,epa.gov if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Shaheerah Kelly, Environmental Engineer

Permits Office

Air Division

Enclosures
## Addendum: A n Assessment of

Environmental Problems Associated with Recycling of

Hazardous Secondary Materials

Appendix 2: Additional Sites Considered B ut N ot Included i n the Dam age Case AnalysisJune 2011 

## Appendix 2 Additional Sites Considered But Not I ncluded in the Damage Case Analysis

Site Nam e State EPA/ RCRA ID Reason Rejected

Ba ye r Cropscience, LP West Virginia WVD005005509 Damage Unrelated to Recycling Environmental Quality Company North Carolina NCD982170292 Damage Unrelated to Recycling Agri um Hartsville Rainbow Operations South Carolina SCD003350675 Damage Unrelated to Recycling
#### § 28.66 Review procedure.

A review of any Form A, C, or D determination may be requested by the owner or custodian of the cotton from which the sample was drawn within 30 days after the issuance of the original memorandum. Such review shall cover all of the quality factors for which the original determination was made. Requests for reviews of Form A or D determinations may be filed with, and the review made by, the Classing Office which issued such memorandum or the Quality Control System. Requests for reviews of Form C determinations shall be filed with, and the reviews made by, the Quality Control System. Redrawn samples shall be required for reviews of Form A and Form C determinations except in cases where the original samples have remained, identity preserved, in the custody of the Division. When redrawn samples are necessary, they shall be drawn and submitted as prescribed in this subpart. As evidence of a review determination, a Form A or D memorandum or Form C certificate appropriately marked to indicate that it represents a review determination shall be issued to the applicant requesting the review. The applicant may be required by the Classing Office or the Quality Control Section issuing such review determination to surrender the original classification memorandum or certificate. In any event the review determination shall supersede and invalidate the original determination.

[52 FR 30882, Aug. 18, 1987]
February 28, 2005




Exhibit 10.43




March 11, 2005

 

 

United Air Lines, Inc.

Attention: General Counsel

I hereby agree to an additional 11% reduction in my Base
Salary plus I elect to take an additional 4% temporary reduction in my
Base Salary as defined in my Employment Agreement with United dated September
5, 2002 and as amended on December 8, 2002 and February 17, 2003 ("Agreement")
from $712,500 to $605,625 effective January 1, 2005. The temporary reduction
will be cancelled upon my election. I understand and agree that this is
not an amendment to the Agreement and, for this purpose only, I agree to
waive Board approval of the reduction as required by the following provision
in Section 3.b. of the Agreement.

Base salary shall not thereafter during the term of
this Agreement be decreased unless such reduction (i) is approved by the
Board in accordance with the standards set forth in the UAL Restated Certificate
of Incorporation, and (ii) is applied on a proportionally similar and no
less favorable basis to Executive than to substantially all other management
employees of United.

In all other respects, the provisions of the Agreement remain
unchanged and in full force and effect.

 
	 	Sincerely,
	 	 
	 	/s/ Glenn F. Tilton
	 	Glenn F. Tilton
	 	President, Chairman and CEO
	 	 
	 	 
	Agreed and Confirmed this 11th
day	 
	Of March, 2005	 
	 	 
	 	 
	UAL CORPORATION 	UNITED AIR LINES, INC.
	 	 
	By:     

/s/ Paul R. Lovejoy	By:     

/s/ Paul R. Lovejoy
	Title:    Senior
Vice President,	Title:    Senior
Vice President, 
	          
General Counsel and Secretary	          
General Counsel and Secretary
§ 301.81-2 Regulated articles. ( a ) *List of regulated articles.* The Administrator has determined that certain articles present a risk of spread of the imported fire ant. A list of all such articles is found on the internet at *www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/planthealth/plant-pest-and-disease-programs/pests-and-diseases/imported-fire-ants/ct_imported_fire_ants*. Lists of all regulated articles may also be obtained by request from any local Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ) office; local offices are listed in telephone directories and on the internet at *www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/planthealth/ppq-program-overview/sphd*.
( b ) *Normal process for designating additional regulated articles.* ( 1 ) If the Administrator determines that an article not already listed at *www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/planthealth/plant-pest-and-disease-programs/pests-and-diseases/imported-fire-ants/ct_imported_fire_ants* presents a risk of spread of the imported fire ant, APHIS will publish a notice in the Federal Register proposing to designate the article as a regulated article for imported fire ant. The notice will provide the basis for this determination, and will request public comment.
( 2 ) If no comments are received on the notice, or if the comments do not change the Administrator's determination, APHIS will publish a second notice in the Federal Register designating the article as a regulated article for the imported fire ant and listing it.
( c ) *Immediate designation of regulated articles.* An inspector may designate any other article or means of conveyance as a regulated article if the inspector determines that it presents a risk of spread of the imported fire ant due to its proximity to an infestation of the imported fire ant, and after the inspector provides notification to the person in possession of the article or means of conveyance that it is now regulated under this subpart.
[87 FR 80012, Dec. 29, 2022]
Editorial Note on Part 1955
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1955 appear at 80 FR 9895, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1955.51 Purpose. This subpart delegates authority and prescribes policies and procedures for the Rural Housing Service (RHS), Rural Business-Cooperative Service (RBS) andherein referred to as “Agency.” This subpart does not apply to Farm Service Agency, Farm Loan Programs, or to RHS single family housing loans or community program loans sold without insurance to the private sector. These community program loans will be serviced by the private sector, and future revisions to this subpart no longer apply to such loans. This subpart does not apply to the Rural Rental Housing, Rural Cooperative Housing, or Farm Labor Housing Program of RHS. In addition, this subpart does not apply to Water and Waste Programs of the Rural Utilities Service, Watershed loans, and Resource Conservation and Development loans, which are serviced under part 1782 of this title. This subpart covers: ( a ) Management of real property which has been taken into custody by the respective Agency after abandonment by the borrower;
( b ) Management of real and chattel property which is in Agency inventory; and
( c ) Management of real and chattel property which is security for a guaranteed loan liquidated by an Agency (or which the Agency is in the process of liquidating).
[61 FR 59778, Nov. 22, 1996, as amended at 69 FR 69106, Nov. 26, 2004; 72 FR 55019, Sept. 28, 2007; 72 FR 64123, Nov. 15, 2007]
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 11

                              EASTERN BANCORP, INC.
           Computation of Primary and Fully diluted Earnings Per Share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   For the Years Ended September 30,
                                                   ---------------------------------
                                                  1996           1995           1994
                                                  ----           ----           ----
<S>                                             <C>            <C>            <C>
NET INCOME                                       $3,304         $4,195         $3,659
                                                 ------         ------         ------
                                                 ------         ------         ------

PRIMARY
  Shares:
    Weighted-average number
      of common shares outstanding            3,634,577      3,588,481      3,534,208
    Dilutive effect of outstanding
      stock options                             173,147        133,092        124,302
                                              ---------      ---------      ---------

    Weighted-average number of
      common shares and common
      stock equivalents                       3,807,724      3,721,573      3,658,510
                                              ---------      ---------      ---------
                                              ---------      ---------      ---------


Earnings per share                                $0.87          $1.13          $1.00
                                                  -----          -----          -----
                                                  -----          -----          -----

ASSUMING FULL DILUTION:
  Shares:
    Weighted-average number
      of common shares outstanding            3,634,577      3,588,481      3,534,208

    Fully diluted effect of outstanding
      stock options                             220,391        141,576        133,884
                                              ---------      ---------      ---------

    Weighted-average number of
      common shares and common
      stock equivalents                       3,854,968      3,730,057      3,668,092
                                              ---------      ---------      ---------
                                              ---------      ---------      ---------

Earnings per share                                $0.86          $1.12          $1.00
                                                  -----          -----          -----
                                                  -----          -----          -----
</TABLE>
#### § 29.2523 Grademark.

A grademark normally consists of three symbols which indicate group, quality, and color. A letter is used to indicate group, a number to indicate quality, and a letter or letters to indicate color. For example, B3D means Heavy Leaf, good quality, and dark-brown color.
#### The State ex rel. Minzler, Appellant, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellee.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Minzler v. Indus. Comm.*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 377.]

(No. 97-1440

Submitted August 19, 1998

Decided October 14, 1998.)

*Law Office of Thomas Tootle*and *Thomas Tootle,*for appellant.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Craigg E. Gould,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. 3:97cr81/RV

3:97cr92/RV

3:97cr103/RV

CHRISTOPHER SUMMERS

ORDER

The defendant has filed a request for a certificate of appealability in each of the

above-styled cases. Defendant appeals the court’s denial of his Rule 60(b) motion, styled

“motion to void judgment, order or proceeding under Title 28 U.S.C. Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure, Rule 60(b)(4)(5)(6)” in each case. Unless a certificate of appealability is issued,

the defendant may not take an appeal from the final order denying a Rule 60(b) motion.

Gonzalez v. Secretary of Department of Corrections, 317 F.3d 1308, 1312 (11th Cir. 2003).

A certificate of appealability should not issue in the appeal from the denial of a Rule 60(b)

motion in a habeas case unless the petitioner/defendant shows, at a minimum, that it is

debatable among jurists of reason whether the district court abused its discretion, see

Mobley v. Head, 306 F.3d 1096, 1097 (11th Cir. 2002) (“This Court reviews a denial of a

60(b) motion for an abuse of discretion.”). Because the court finds the defendant has not

made the requisite showing, his requests for a certificate of appealability are DENIED. 

Defendant has not filed motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The court

finds that the appeals are not taken in good faith and he is not otherwise entitled to so

proceed. Fed.R.App.P. 24(a)(3). Therefore, defendant shall pay the $455.00 filing fee in

each case within thirty days.

Case 3:97-cr-00103-RV-CJK Document 35 Filed 05/18/07 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 3:96cr57/RV; 3:03cv2/RV/MD

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

The clerk is directed to place a copy of this order in each of the above-styled cases.

Defendant’s requests for certificates of appealability are DENIED in each case.

Defendant shall pay the $455.00 filing fee in each case within thirty days from the

date of this order.

DONE AND ORDERED this 18th day of May, 2007.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:97-cr-00103-RV-CJK Document 35 Filed 05/18/07 Page 2 of 2
# L_2020351EN.01000101.xml

| 22.10.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 351/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 351/1

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2020/1533

of 15 October 2020

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Limone dell’Etna’ (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 52(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Limone dell’Etna’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 50(2)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Limone dell’Etna’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Limone dell’Etna’ should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of opposition under Article 51 of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 has been received by the Commission, the name ‘Limone dell’Etna’ should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name ‘Limone dell’Etna’ (PGI) is hereby entered in the register.

The name specified in the first paragraph denotes a product in Class 1.6. – Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed, as listed in Annex XI to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 (3).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 October 2020.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Janusz WOJCIECHOWSKI

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 14.12.2012, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 204, 18.6.2020, p. 24.

2

(3)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 668/2014 of 13 June 2014 laying down rules for the application of Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ L 179, 19.6.2014, p. 36).

3

---
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2408 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2408

To prohibit the Department of Justice from tracking and cataloguing the 
               purchases of multiple rifles and shotguns.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 18, 2013

  Mr. Schweikert (for himself and Mr. Amash) introduced the following 
       bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the Department of Justice from tracking and cataloguing the 
               purchases of multiple rifles and shotguns.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF TRACKING OR CATALOGUING FIREARMS PURCHASES.

    For fiscal year 2013 and each fiscal year thereafter, no Federal 
funds may be used to require or continue to require a person licensed 
under section 923 of title 18, United States Code, to report 
information to the Department of Justice regarding the sale of multiple 
rifles or shotguns to the same person.
                                 <all>
```