alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
May 9, 2011 

MEMORANDUM 

From: William H. Maxwell 

EPA/SPPD/ESG (D243-01) 

To: Docket Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0234 

Subject: May 4, 2011, Meeting with Evangelical Environmental Network 

Attendees: 

EPA: 

Ellen Kurlansky, OAR/OPAR 

Evangelical Environmental Network: 

Rev. Mitchell Hescox, Evangelical Environmental Network 

Jennifer Haglof, National Association of Evangelicals 

Galen Carey, National Association of Evangelicals 

Discussion: 

The subject of the meeting was the mercury control in the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards 

rulemaking. They wanted to understand how we developed our cost and benefits numbers. 

On Monday, May 9, 2011, Ellen Kurlansky had a quick follow up meeting with Rev. Hescox and 

Rev Jim Ball, also of the Evangelical Environmental Network. They wanted to discuss the 

relationship between mercury deposition and health effects.
*Monday, September 14, 1998*

MOTION DOCKET

97- 1595.

#### Genaro v. Cent. Transport, Inc.

Certified State Law Question, Nos. 1:96CV2282, 1:97CV00598 and 1:97CV601. This cause came before the court on the certification of a state law question from the United States District Court, Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division. Upon consideration of the joint motion of petitioners and *amici curiae*Ohio Employment Lawyers Association, the Committee Against Sexual Harassment, the National Organization of Women’s Legal and Education Foundation, that counsel for *amici curiae*present oral argument on behalf of the petitioners,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion that counsel for *amici curiae*present oral argument on behalf of the petitioners be, and hereby is, granted.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:98cr86-02/RV

FELIX SALVADORE GONZALEZ

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Senior Judge Roger Vinson on November 28, 2005 

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION to eliminate enhancements and reduce sentence 

Filed by Defendant on 11/14/2005 Doc.# 244 

 

RESPONSES:

 United States on 11/21/2005 Doc.# 245

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

 Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

 s/Jerry Marbut

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Jerry Marbut

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 28th day of

 November , 2005, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) 

 /s/ Roger Vinson

ROGER VINSON

Senior United States District Judge

Case 3:98-cr-00086-RV Document 246 Filed 11/28/05 Page 1 of 1
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

RICHARD CLYDE ALTHOUSE

, Appellant,

v.

CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 22

- 21

[ October 13, 2022 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm

Beach County ; John S. Kastrenakes , Judge; L.T. Case No.

502021CA009746

.

Richard Clyde Althouse, Sebring , pro se.

Anthony M. Stella, Assistant City Attorney II, Office of the City Attorney

, City of West Palm Beach, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URI AM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER

, C IKLIN and A RTAU

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2259 

AN ACT 

To withdraw certain Federal land and interests in that land 

from location, entry, and patent under the mining laws 

and disposition under the mineral and geothermal leasing 

laws and to preserve existing uses. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2259 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘North Fork Watershed 

3 Protection Act of 2014’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

5 In this Act: 

6 (1) ELIGIBLE FEDERAL LAND.—The term ‘‘eli7 gible Federal land’’ means— 

8 (A) any federally owned land or interest in 

9 land depicted on the Map as within the North 

10 Fork Federal Lands Withdrawal Area; or 

11 (B) any land or interest in land located 

12 within the North Fork Federal Lands With13 drawal Area that is acquired by the Federal 

14 Government after the date of enactment of this 

15 Act. 

16 (2) MAP.—The term ‘‘Map’’ means the Bureau 

17 of Land Management map entitled ‘‘North Fork 

18 Federal Lands Withdrawal Area’’ and dated June 9, 

19 2010. 

20 SEC. 3. WITHDRAWAL. 

21 (a) WITHDRAWAL.—Subject to valid existing rights, 

22 the eligible Federal land is withdrawn from— 

23 (1) all forms of location, entry, and patent 

24 under the mining laws; and 

25 (2) disposition under all laws relating to min26 eral leasing and geothermal leasing. 
3 

•HR 2259 EH

1 (b) AVAILABILITY OF MAP.—Not later than 30 days 

2 after the date of enactment of this Act, the Map shall be 

3 made available to the public at each appropriate office of 

4 the Bureau of Land Management. 

5 (c) EFFECT OF SECTION.—Nothing in this section 

6 violates the rights of existing leaseholders or prohibits the 

7 Secretary of the Interior from taking any action necessary 

8 to complete any requirement under the National Environ9 mental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) or 

10 the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et 

11 seq.) required for permitting surface-disturbing activity to 

12 occur on any lease issued before the date of enactment 

13 of this Act. 

14 SEC. 4. EXISTING USES NOT AFFECTED. 

15 Except with respect to the withdrawal under section 

16 3, nothing in this Act restricts recreational uses, livestock 

17 management activities, or forest management activities al18 lowed on the date of the enactment of this Act on the eligi19 ble Federal land in accordance with applicable law. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 4, 

2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2259 

AN ACT 

To withdraw certain Federal land and interests in 

existing uses. eral and geothermal leasing laws and to preserve the mining laws and disposition under the minthat land from location, entry, and patent under
§ 248.8 Level of benefits and eligible foods. ( a ) *General.* State agencies shall identify in the State Plan the fresh, nutritious, unprepared, locally grown fruits, vegetables and herbs which are eligible for purchase under the FMNP. Ineligible foods for the purpose of the FMNP include, but are not limited to: honey, maple syrup, cider, nuts and seeds, eggs, cheese, meat and seafood. Locally grown shall mean produce grown only within a State's borders but may be defined to include border areas in adjacent States. Under no circumstances can produce grown outside of the United States and its territories be considered eligible foods.
( b ) *The value of the Federal benefits received.* The value of the Federal FMNP benefit received by each recipient, or by each family within a household in those States which elect to issue benefits on a household basis under § 248.6(c) may not be less than $10 per year nor more than $30 per year.
[59 FR 11517, Mar. 11, 1994, as amended at 60 FR 49746, Sept. 27, 1995; 73 FR 65250, Nov. 3, 2008]
** **

** **

**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**Section 906 Certification**

 

Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.Section 1350), the undersigned officer of Centennial Bank Holdings, Inc.(the “Company”) hereby certifies that the Company’s Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company. 

 

Dated: November 8, 2007

 
|   |                                               |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                               |
|   | /s/ Daniel  M. Quinn                               |
|   | Name: Daniel M. Quinn                              |
|   | Title:   *Chief Executive  Officer* |

 

Theforegoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) and is notbeing filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. 

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2289 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2289

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To rename section 219(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as the 
                   Kay Bailey Hutchison Spousal IRA.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON SPOUSAL IRA.

    The heading of subsection (c) of section 219 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``Special Rules for Certain 
Married Individuals'' and inserting ``Kay Bailey Hutchison Spousal 
IRA''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 25, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2289

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To rename section 219(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as the 
                   Kay Bailey Hutchison Spousal IRA.
```
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
      THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Chardan North China Acquisition
      Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007
      (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof, I Li Zhang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, that:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Dated:
                July 2, 2007
            CHARDAN
                NORTH CHINA ACQUISITION CORPORATIONBy:
            /s/
                Li ZhangLi
                Zhang
              Chief
                Executive Officer
              (Principal
                Executive Officer)
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 7358** 

FLINT FITZGERALD JOHNSON, JR. , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. ALVIN W. KELLER, JR. , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro
. Wallace W. Dixon , Magistrate Judge. ( 1:10

- cv - 00346

- TDS

- WWD )

Submitted : January 18, 2011 Decided: January 27, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published pe r curiam opinion
. Flint Fitzgerald Johnson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Flint Johnson, Jr. seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C.A
. § 2254 (West 2010) petition for failure to pay the requisite filing fee. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final j udgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell The district court’s order was entered on the docket on June 10, 2010. The notice of appeal was filed on September 13, 2010. Because Johnson failed to file a t imely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

DISMISSE D
================================================================================

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the three-month
period ending March 31, 2006 of Dujour Products, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
"Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, Adrian Crimeni, Chairman, President and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.


/s/ Adrian Crimeni
----------------------------------
Adrian Crimeni

President, Secretary Treasurer, Principal Executive Officer,
Principal Financial Officer and sole Director


Date:  August 8, 2006











--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C SECTION 350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Oakmont Acquisition Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007, (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof, I, Michael C. Azar, President, Secretary, Principal Accounting Officer and a Director of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: June 14, 2007



|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael C. Azar                                            
|Michael C. Azar                                                
|President, Secretary, Principal Accounting Officer and Director
IB 

Union Calendar No. 259 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2385 

[Report No. 113–349, Part I] 

To amend the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection 

Act to set the rate of pay for employees of the Bureau of Consumer 

Financial Protection in accordance with the General Schedule. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 14, 2013 

Mr. DUFFY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and 

Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

FEBRUARY 10, 2014 

Additional sponsors: Mrs. BACHMANN, Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mr. FINCHER, 

Mr. CRAMER, Mr. RENACCI, Mr. HUIZENGA of Michigan, Mr. COTTON, 

Mr. MULVANEY, Mrs. ROBY, Mr. SCHOCK, Mr. RADEL, Mr. ROTHFUS, 

and Mrs. WAGNER

FEBRUARY 10, 2014 

Reported by the Committee on Financial Services 

FEBRUARY 10, 2014 

The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform discharged; committed 

to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 2385 RH

A BILL 

To amend the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act to set the rate of pay for employees 

of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection in accordance with the General Schedule. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•HR 2385 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘CFPB Pay Fairness 

5 Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RATE OF PAY FOR EMPLOYEES OF THE BUREAU OF 

7 CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1013(a)(2) of the Dodd9 Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 

10 (12 U.S.C. 5493(a)(2)) is amended to read as follows: 

11 ‘‘(2) COMPENSATION.—The rates of basic pay 

12 for all employees of the Bureau shall be set and ad13 justed by the Director in accordance with the Gen14 eral Schedule set forth in section 5332 of title 5, 

15 United States Code.’’. 

16 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

17 subsection (a) shall apply to service by an employee of the 

18 Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection following the 

19 90-day period beginning on the date of enactment of this 

20 Act. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

Union Calendar No. 259 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2385 

[Report No. 113–349, Part I] 

A BILL 

To amend the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and 

Schedule. cial Protection in accordance with the General for employees of the Bureau of Consumer FinanConsumer Protection Act to set the rate of pay 

FEBRUARY 10, 2014 

Reported by the Committee on Financial Services 

FEBRUARY 10, 2014 

The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

printed House on the State of the Union and ordered to be discharged; committed to the Committee of the Whole 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:88-cr-01007-MP-AK

WILLIE BUD REED, JR,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Motion for Reconsideration, Doc. 1326, by Willie Bud

Reed, Jr. In that motion, Mr. Reed asks the Court to reconsider its order, Doc. 1325, regarding

his Motion for Relief from Judgment and his Motion for Reconsideration. Mr. Reed had

appealed his judgment and sentence to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh

Circuit, divesting this court of jurisdiction over matters in that appeal, except to the extent that

the Court must act in aid of the appeal. United States v. Hitchmon, 602 F.2d 689, 692 (5th Cir.

1979) (en banc). 

Mr. Reed now argues that the motions concern different matters than those on appeal

before the Eleventh Circuit. He claims that his motion for relief from judgment concerns the

return of property, which is different than the reduction in sentence he also desires, even though

those consequences flow from the same criminal acts and criminal judgment. He claims that the

motion to revisit concerns his motion for a new trial, unrelated to the motion seeking a reduction

in sentence, even though the new trial is desired for the same criminal conduct for which he was

sentenced. These are not matters collateral to the merits of the appeal- they concern the same
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 1:88-cr-01007-MP-AK

merits, and the validity of the same judgment and sentence on the same criminal conduct. 

Therefore, Defendant’s citation of Taylor v. Sterrett, 640 F.2d 663, 667-68 (5th Cir. 1981)

(explaining that a district court is divested of jurisdiction only as to the matters on appeal), does

not help his cause.

Mr. Reed claims that he asks for different relief in the motions at issue now than he did in

the motions at issue on appeal. Both of those forms of relief, however, concern the same merits

of the same judgment on the same criminal conduct. Therefore, the current matter is not

collateral to those on appeal, and this Court has no jurisdiction to review it. Accordingly, the

Motion to Reconsider this Court’s dismissal of those motions is DENIED. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 2nd day of March, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i) the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



|                         |  |  |  |                                                                
|------------------------ |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: September 3, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Sang Park                                                  
|                         |  |  |  | Sang Park Chief Executive
Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or incorporated by reference in any registration statement of the Company filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 29.3566 Variegated.

Any leaf of which 20 percent or more of its leaf surface is off brown, grayish, mottled, or bleached and does not blend with the normal colors of the type. (See Rules 17, § 29.3618; 18, § 29.3619.)

[30 FR 9207, July 23, 1965. Redesignated at 49 FR 16759, Apr. 20, 1984]