alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### George Marcus LOWE, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 14922.

United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit.

Feb. 19, 1954.

Hayden C. Covington, Brooklyn, N. Y., for appellant.

Joseph L. Flynn, Asst. U. S. Atty., St. Joseph, Mo. (Edward L. Scheufler, U. S. Atty., Kansas City, Mo., on the brief), for appellee.

Before GARDNER, Chief Judge, and THOMAS and COLLET, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This case was argued and submitted with the case of Weaver v. United States, 8 Cir., 210 F.2d 815. It was decided with the Weaver case and upon the same grounds. For the reasons stated in Weaver v. United States, decided this day, the cause is reversed.
AO 9 1 (Rev. 11 /1 1) Criminal Compl aint 

UNITED STATES DISTRlCT COURT 

for the 

Northern District of Florida 

United States of America 

v. 

CURTIS LEE WOODS JR. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. \:\9~ ~ 

Defendant(s) 

CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 

I, the complainant in this case, state that the following is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. 

On or about the date(s) of July 29, 2019 in the county of Alachua 

Northern District of ____ F_lo_ri_d_a ___ , the defendant(s) violated: 

Code Section 

18USC922(g)(1) 

Offense Description 

Possession of a Firearm by Convicted Felon 

This criminal complaint is based on these facts: 

See attached affidavit of ATF Special Agent Justin Mace , which is incorporated herein by reference. 

~ Continued on the attached sheet. 

in the 

ll7:lWd 61, E d3S 

no aN7.:f Jasn 0371.::l 

Special Agent Justin Mace , ATF 

Printed name and title 

Sworn to before me and signed in my presence. 

Date: 5c.pt: 

City and state: Gainesville, Florida Gary R. Jones, United States Magistrate Judge 

Printed name and title 

Case 1:19-cr-00036-AW-GRJ Document 1 Filed 09/03/19 Page 1 of 1
§ 2500.050 Suspension, termination, and withholding of support. ( a ) *General.* If an awardee has failed to materially comply with the terms and conditions of the award, OAO may take certain enforcement actions, including, but not limited to, suspending the award pending corrective action and terminating the award for cause.
( b ) *Suspension.* OAO generally will suspend (rather than immediately terminate) an award to allow the awardee an opportunity to take appropriate corrective action before OAO makes a termination decision. OAO may decide to terminate the award if the awardee does not take appropriate corrective action during the period of suspension. OAO may terminate, without first suspending, the award if the deficiency is so serious as to warrant immediate termination. Termination for cause may be appealed under the terms and conditions identified in the OAO award agreement.
( c ) *Termination.* An award also may be terminated, partially or wholly, by the awardee or by OAO with the consent of the awardee. If the awardee decides to terminate a portion of the award, OAO may determine that the remaining portion of the award will not accomplish the purposes for which the award was originally made. In any such case, OAO will advise the awardee of the possibility of termination of the entire award and allow the awardee to withdraw its termination request. If the awardee does not withdraw its request for partial termination, OAO may initiate procedures to terminate the entire award for cause.
##### 



EXHIBIT 12.2
 RULE 13A-14(A) CERTIFICATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of the Company;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the Company and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding
the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting;
and




---



##### 



5.
    
    The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of
the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Edward D. Ford
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS

ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael J. Wagner, Chief Executive Officer of The Parent Company in compliance with 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The
Parent Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 2, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The Parent Company.

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 16th day of September 2008.



/s/ Michael J. WagnerMichael J. WagnerChief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 32**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Each of the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to their knowledge:

(1)          this periodic report fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)          the information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Advanced BioEnergy, LLC.

Dated:  February 15, 2007
|        | * * | */s/Revis L. Stephenson III* |
|--------|----------|------------------------------|
|   |     | Revis L. Stephenson III      |
|   |     | Chief Executive Officer      |
|   |     |                         |
|   |     |                         |
|   |     | */s/ Richard Peterson*       |
|   |     | Richard Peterson             |
|   |     | Chief Financial Officer      |
|   |     |                         |

 

----
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2351 

To repeal the fossil fuel consumption percentage reduction requirements for 

Federal buildings under the Energy Conservation and Production Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 13, 2013 

Mr. WHITFIELD (for himself, Mr. MCKINLEY, Mr. ENYART, and Mr. RAHALL) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation 

and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To repeal the fossil fuel consumption percentage reduction 

requirements for Federal buildings under the Energy 

Conservation and Production Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF FOSSIL FUEL CONSUMPTION PER4 CENTAGE REDUCTION REQUIREMENTS FOR 

5 FEDERAL BUILDINGS. 

6 (a) REPEAL.—Subclauses (I) and (II) of section 

7 305(a)(3)(D)(i) of the Energy Conservation and Produc8 tion Act (42 U.S.C. 6834(a)(3)(D)(i)) are repealed. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2351 IH

1 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 

2 305(a)(3)(D)(vi) of the Energy Conservation and Produc3 tion Act is amended by striking ‘‘subclauses (I) and (III) 

4 of clause (i)’’ and inserting ‘‘clause (i)’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

HAROLD SEYMORE,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 4:20cv60-TKW-MAF 

CAPTAIN J. CHUN, et al.,

Defendants.

/

OR D E R

This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 9). No objections were filed. Having reviewed the Report 

and Recommendation and the case file, I agree with the magistrate judge’s 

determination that this case should be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure 

to comply with a court order. Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED that the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is 

adopted by the Court and incorporated into this Order, this case is DISMISSED, and 

the Clerk shall close the file.

DONE and ORDERED this 8th day of June, 2020.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:20-cv-00060-TKW-MAF Document 10 Filed 06/08/20 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2406 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2406

                   For the relief of Daniel Wachira.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 17, 2013

  Mr. Rangel introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                   For the relief of Daniel Wachira.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR DANIEL WACHIRA.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Daniel Wachira shall be 
eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 
to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon 
filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 
204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Daniel Wachira enters the United 
States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), he shall 
be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if 
otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 
245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status is filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Daniel Wachira, the Secretary 
of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 
current or next following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant 
visas that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's 
birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, 
if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that are made 
available to natives of the country of the alien's birth under section 
202(e) of such Act.
    (e) Denial of Preferential Immigration Treatment for Certain 
Relatives.--The natural parents, brothers, and sisters of Daniel 
Wachira shall not, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded any 
right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

PATRICK KORTLEVER,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:20cv5178/MCR/EMT

CORIZON HEALTH SERVICES, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________/

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Chief Magistrate Judge’s Report and 

Recommendation dated August 28, 2020. ECF No. 10. Plaintiff has been furnished 

a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to 

file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No 

objections have been filed. On de novo review, the Court has determined that the 

Chief Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations are supported by the record 

and by proper analysis. Therefore, the Court finds that the Report and 

Recommendation is due to be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The Chief Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 

10, is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

Case 3:20-cv-05178-MCR-EMT Document 11 Filed 10/01/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:20cv5178/MCR/EMT

2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for Plaintiff’s 

failure to comply with an order of the court.

3. The Clerk is directed to close the file. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 1st day of October 2020.

M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-05178-MCR-EMT Document 11 Filed 10/01/20 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.2**Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302**I, Keith R. Schroeder, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Orchids Paper Products Company (the“Registrant”);2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) [reserved](c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.           Date: November 5, 2007 /s/ Keith R. Schroeder     Keith R. Schroeder  Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2391 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2391

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 25, 2014

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 5323 Highway N in Cottleville, Missouri as the ``Lance Corporal 
                    Phillip Vinnedge Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LANCE CORPORAL PHILLIP D. VINNEDGE POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 5323 Highway N in Cottleville, Missouri, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Lance Corporal Phillip Vinnedge Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any references in a law, map, regulation, 
document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Lance Corporal Phillip Vinnedge Post Office''.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 24, 2014.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 224 (Monday, November 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71129-71130]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29382]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Update to Notice of Financial Institutions for Which the Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation Has Been Appointed Either Receiver, 
Liquidator, or Manager

AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

ACTION: Update listing of financial institutions in liquidation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation (Corporation) has been appointed the sole receiver for the 
following financial institutions effective as of the Date Closed as 
indicated in the listing. This list (as updated from time to time in 
the Federal Register) may be relied upon as ``of record'' notice that 
the Corporation has been appointed receiver for purposes of the 
statement of policy published in the July 2, 1992 issue of the Federal 
Register (57 FR 29491). For further information concerning the 
identification of any institutions which have been placed in 
liquidation, please visit the Corporation Web site at http://www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/banklist.html or contact the 
Manager of Receivership Oversight in the appropriate service center.

    Dated: November 15, 2010.

    Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Pamela Johnson,
Regulatory Editing Specialist.

                                           Institutions in Liquidation
                                             [In alphabetical order]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          FDIC Ref. No.                   Bank name                 City             State        Date closed
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10311...........................  Copper Star Bank........  Scottsdale.........  AZ            11/12/2010
10312...........................  Darby Bank & Trust Co...  Vidalia............  GA            11/12/2010
10313...........................  Tifton Banking Company..  Tifton.............  GA            11/12/2010
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[[Page 71130]]

[FR Doc. 2010-29382 Filed 11-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6741-01-P
#### In the Matter of Gerald Chiariello, Petitioner. Solomon A. Klein, Chief Counsel to the Judicial Inquiry on Professional Conduct, et al., Respondents.

This application by a former attorney for reinstatement as an attorney and counselor at law (he was disbarred by order of this court dated June 19, 1961) was on May 13, 1968 referred to the Committee on Character and Fitness for the Second Judicial District for investigation, hearing, report and recommendations. The committee’s report has been received by the court. Application granted; petitioner’s name directed to be restored to the roll of attorneys and counselors at law, effective forthwith. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.