alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
J a 

~ LEAGUE OF COfVSERV,4TlOfi1 !/OTE9i5 

My name is Mark Sheridan and I am here to express support for the Environmental Protection 

Agency's proposal to set limits on carbon pollution from power plants. 

I am here as an intern at League of Conservation Voters, a student at Dartmouth College, but 

most importantly as a representative of today's youth. 

We are already experiencing the effects of a warming climate caused by human activities, and if 

we don't take action, my generation will have to deal with even more extreme impacts. My 

generation understands the risks that are at stake: a 2013 poll showed that 80% of individuals 

under the age of 35 support the President's Climate Action Plan, which includes the EPA's limits 

on carbon pollution from power plants as a main pillar. It is critical that we take aggressive 

action on climate change today in order to avoid more devastating impacts in the future. 

Despite repeated warnings from a strong consensus of scientists over the past several decades, 

Congress has failed to take action. This failure to act is caused by members of Congress who 

are more concerned about protecting the profits of polluters than protecting the health of 

communities and the environment. Among members of Congress in office today who obstruct 

efforts to address climate change, many of them are over the age of 60 or 70. They will not 

have to (ive with the most extreme impacts of climate change. But my generation will. 

Thankfully the EPA has proposed to take action on climate change. The EPA's plan is a sensible 

step in reducing carbon pollution from our nation's largest source of carbon emissions. As it 

currently stands, power plants which account for 40% of U.S. carbon emissions are allowed to 

emit carbon pollution for free. The EPA's plan changes this and puts our country on a path to a 

more livable future. 

The opponents of this plan will try to say that now is not the right time for limits on carbon 

pollution. But the status quo is not an option. Continuing to dump carbon pollution into the 

atmosphere with no limits will lead to climate disaster. 

In the interest of my generation and future generations, we must act now to address climate 

change. The EPA's plan to reduce carbon pollution from power plants is a bold step in 

addressing climate change and I am proud to support it, along with overwhelming majority of 

people my age. 

Thank you. 

Mark Sheridan 

League of Conservatfon Voters 

mark_sheridan@Icv.org 

202-454-4583 

1920 L Street NW, Suite 800 • Washington, DC 20036 • 202-785-8683 • Fax: 202-835-0491 

Icv@Icv.org• www.lcv.org
###### Editorial Note on Part 1924

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1924 appear at 80 FR 9870, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1924.3 Authorities and responsibilities.

The County Supervisor and District Director are authorized to redelegate, in writing, any authority delegated to them in this subpart to the Assistant County Supervisor and Assistant District Director, respectively, when determined to be qualified. Agency Construction Inspectors, District Loan Assistants, and County Office Assistants are authorized to perform duties under this subpart as authorized in their job descriptions.
#### §§ 205.291-205.299 [Reserved]
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 10.20

            Summary of Compensation Arrangement for Named Executives

         None of the Company's CEO or it the four other most highly compensated
executive officers for its last completed fiscal year (collectively, the "named
executives") have employment agreements with the Company. The compensation for
the named executives is determined by the Compensation/Nominating/Governance
("C/N/G") Committee of the Board of Directors, generally annually. Effective
March 1, 2005, the base salary for the named executives is as follows:

         NAMED EXECUTIVE                             BASE SALARY

         Richard L. Wambold...........................$860,000
         Andrew A. Campbell...........................$380,365
         Peter J. Lazaredes...........................$414,000
         James D. Morris..............................$355,000
         John N. Schwab...............................$340,000

         In addition to base salaries, the named executives (i) are participants
under the Company's 2002 Incentive Compensation Plan (the "Plan"), can earn
Annual Incentive Awards and Performance Shares under the Plan, and may be
awarded other types of incentive compensation, including stock options, as
provided in the Plan; (ii) receive perquisite allowances, in the amount of
$40,000 for Mr. Wambold, and $30,000 for the other named executives, and up to
an additional $15,000 in 2005 and $10,000 in later years for re-imbursement for
financial planning advice; (iii) under the Company's Change in Control Severance
Benefit Plan for Key Executives, are eligible to receive certain benefits in the
event of a change-in-control (as defined in such plan), including severance
payments and three additional years of service benefits under the Company's
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan; (iv) earn benefits under the Company's
pension plan and its Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan; and (v) are
eligible to participate in the Company's other employee benefit plans, including
its 401(k) Plan (including amounts paid in lieu of matching contributions under
the 401(k) Plan), its medical, dental, and other health and welfare plans, and
its deferred compensation plan, on the same terms as other employees of the
Company. Under the Company's deferred compensation plan, participants who elect
to invest all or a portion of their Annul Incentive Awards in the Pactiv Stock
Index Account receive a premium of one additional Common Stock Equivalent for
each five Common Stock Equivalents purchased, provided such investment in the
Pactiv Stock Index Account is maintained for at least three years. Copies of the
various plans are filed as Exhibits to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K,
and are incorporated herein by reference.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 222 (Thursday, November 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 70740]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29038]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER11-2037-000]


Elk City II Wind, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

November 8, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Elk City II Wind, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes 
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR Part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is November 29, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e4a2a1b6a7ab8a888d8a81b79194948b9690a482819687ca838b92"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6e282b3c2d21000207000b3d1b1e1e011c1a2e080b1c0d40090118">[email protected]</span></a> or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-29038 Filed 11-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 8, 2020

No. 04

- 19

- 00716

- CV

THE STATE OF TEXAS ex. rel. Todd A. Durden, In His Official Capacity as County Attorney

, Appellant s

v.

James T. 'Tully' SHAHAN, In His Official Capacities as County Judge, Mark Frerich, In His Official Capacity as County Commissioner, Joe Montalvo, In His Offi cial Capacity as County Commissioner, Dennis Dodson, In His Official Capacity as County Commissioner, Tim Ward, In His Official Capacity as County Commissioner, Kinney County Commissioners Court and Kinney County, Appellee s

From the 63rd Judicial Distric t Court, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 4866 Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellees have filed a motion to dismiss. Appellant is ORDERED to file a response to the appell ees ’ motion on or before January 21, 2020

.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , J ustice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 8th day of January, 202 0

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRU Z

, Clerk of Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCTS

Case No. 3:19md2885

LIABILITY LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

Baker, 7:20cv39

Judge M. Casey Rodgers

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones

DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS ORDER NO. 1

This Order addresses Defendants’ objections and counter-designations to 

Plaintiff’s affirmative deposition designations and Plaintiff’s objections to 

Defendants’ counter-designations thereto for the following witness depositions:

1. Hamer, Jeffrey 10-7-2015 (Moldex)

2. McNamara, Timothy 3-11-2020

SO ORDERED, on this 2nd day of June, 2021.

M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 7:20-cv-00039-MCR-GRJ Document 142 Filed 06/02/21 Page 1 of 1
98-238.

#### Pesek v. Univ. Neurologists Assn., Inc.

Cuyahoga App. No. 71637. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. Upon consideration of appellees’ motion to withdraw as counsel by Donald H. Switzer and motion to substitute attorney Stephen D. Walters,

. IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motions to withdraw and substitute be, and hereby are, granted.

It appearing to the court from the motion to substitute that the automatic stay in the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas has expired,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that the stay previously granted by this court be, and hereby is, lifted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that appellees’ memorandum in response is due within thirty days of the date of this entry.
#### § 27.46 Cotton withdrawn from storage.

The exchange inspection agency under the supervision or control of which any cotton classified pursuant to this subpart shall be held or stored shall furnish to the Marketing Services Office which classified such cotton, on the first business day of each week, a written statement of all cotton withdrawn from storage, or the lot number or other identification of which has been changed, or which has otherwise been removed from the supervision or control of such exchange inspection agency during the next preceding week. Such statement shall show each lot number, and, if changed, the new lot number, and in case of the withdrawal or removal of a portion only of the lot, the tag numbers of the bales so withdrawn or removed. If such removal shall be to a different place of storage under the supervision or control of the exchange inspection agency, the statement shall show the new location.

[48 FR 49211, Oct. 25, 1983]
#### § 29.2543 Raw.

Freshly harvested tobacco or tobacco as it appears between the time of harvesting and the beginning of the curing process.

[37 FR 13626, July 12, 1972. Redesignated at 49 FR 16757, Apr. 20, 1984]
Editorial Note on Part 1944
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1944 appear at 80 FR 9885, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1944.259 Participatory agreement. ( a ) Before actual acceptance into CHSP, potential participants must work with the PAC and the service coordinator in developing supportive services case plans. A participant has the option of accepting any of the services under the case plan.
( b ) Once the plan is approved by the PAC and the program participant, the participant must sign a participatory agreement governing the utilization of the plan's supportive services and the payment of supportive services fees. The grantee annually must renegotiate the agreement with the participant.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          96,699
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     16,069
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               112,768
<PP&E>                                          65,795
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,178,315
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,244,510
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,649
<COMMON>                                       123,311
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,178,315
<SALES>                                        978,322
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               978,322
<CGS>                                          365,103
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  365,103
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,145,603
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (532,384)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)









</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
   
               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
    
 
   
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form
10-K/A) of Ventritex, Inc. of our report dated July 25, 1996 (except for Note 10
as to which the date is August 21, 1996), included in the 1996 Annual Report to
Shareholders of Ventritex, Inc. and included in Exhibit 13.1 to this Annual
Report.
    
 
   
     Our audit also included the financial statement schedule of Ventritex, Inc.
listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this schedule based
on our audit. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to
above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a
whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth
therein.
    
 
   
                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP
    
   
Palo Alto, California
    
   
February 19, 1997
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc. (the “Registrant”) onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Registrant.

 
| Date: November 06,  2009 | By:    | /s/ Frank Perez         |
|-------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                          |   | Name: Frank Perez       |
|                          |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION

I, **Gary A. Reys**, certify that:

(1)         I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 of CellCyte Genetics Corporation (the "Report");

(2)         Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;

(3)         Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;

(4)         The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)        Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)        Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)        Disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

(5)         The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the  small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)         All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)         Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:     August 14, 2007.

/s/ "*Gary A. Reys*"
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENSACOLA DIVISION 

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS §

EARPLUG PRODUCTS § MDL No. 3:19-md-2885

LIABILITY LITIGATION §

§

§ Judge M. Casey Rodgers

This Document Relates To: 

DUSTIN COURTNEY 

Docket No. 7:20-cv-03025 

§ Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones

NOTICE OF DESIGNATED FORUM 

Plaintiff, DUSTIN COURTNEY, by and through counsel of record, files this 

Notice of Designated Forum, and would show the Court that venue would be proper 

in the United States District Court, District of Minnesota, absent direct filing on the 

administrative docket. Plaintiff reserves the right to amend this designation of proper 

venue and forum, once case specific fact and expert discovery is complete. 

Plaintiff therefore requests that the Court take notice of this designation of 

forum. 

Dated: 5/2/2022 Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Katherine L. Cornell 

Katherine L. Cornell 

 (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) 

Texas State Bar No. 24082858 

Pulaski Law Firm, PLLC 

2925 Richmond Ave., Ste 1725 

Houston, TX 77098 

F: 713 664-4555 

E: kcornell@pulaskilawfirm.com
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on 5/2/2022, I caused the foregoing Notice of Designated 

Forum to be filed with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will 

send notification to all counsel of record. 

/s/ Katherine L. Cornell 

Katherine L. Cornell
Exhibit 4  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the annual report of
Petro-Canada (the Company) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December
31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the date
hereof (the Report), I, Ernest F. H. Roberts, Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
  
  the Report fully complies
  with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
  Act of 1934; and2.
  
  the information contained
  in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
  condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/ Ernest F. H. RobertsName:
  Ernest F. H. RobertsTitle:
  Senior Vice President and
  Chief Financial Officer    March 26, 2003  A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 had been provided to Petro-Canada and will be retained
by Petro-Canada and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Estimation of a Water Budget for 1972-2000 for the Grasslands Area, Central Part of the Western San Joaquin Valley, California 

***By*Charles F. Brush, Kenneth Belitz,  and Steven P. Phillips**

 

 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 

 Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5180 _Version 1.1
98-1207.

#### State ex rel. Williams v. Mengel.

In Mandamus and Procedendo. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.