alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 301.75-8 Interstate movement of regulated seed from a quarantined area. Regulated seed may be moved interstate from a quarantined area into any area of the United States if all of the following conditions are met: ( a ) During the 2 years before the interstate movement, no plants or plant parts infected with or exposed to citrus canker were found in the grove or nursery producing the fruit from which the regulated seed was extracted.
( b ) The regulated seed was treated in accordance with part 305 of this chapter.
( c ) The regulated seed is accompanied by a certificate issued in accordance with § 301.75-12.
[55 FR 37452, Sept. 11, 1990, as amended at 75 FR 4240, Jan. 26, 2010; 87 FR 80010, Dec. 29, 2022]
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JOHN W. MUNSON,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:20cv179–WS/HTC

SUSAN TRUEBLOOD, et al.,

Defendants.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF

No. 11) docketed June 9, 2020. The magistrate judge recommends that the

plaintiff's case be dismissed for failure to state a claim on which relief may be

granted. The plaintiff has filed no objections to the report and recommendation.

Having reviewed the record, the court finds that the magistrate judge’s

report and recommendation is due to be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (ECF No. 11) is

Case 4:20-cv-00179-WS-HTC Document 12 Filed 07/14/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

hereby ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order. 

2. The plaintiff's complaint and this action are DISMISSED for failure to

state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and for failure to follow a court order.

3. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: "All claims are dismissed."

4. The clerk shall note on the docket that this case was dismissed pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1).

DONE AND ORDERED this 14th day of July , 2020.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:20-cv-00179-WS-HTC Document 12 Filed 07/14/20 Page 2 of 2
**Appendix E : Staff Interview Protocol**  **Protocol A**  **: 15 randomly selected staff members making sure that 5 are on the behavior team**  These questions are from the School

- wide Evaluation Tool (SET) 1 and Individual Students

Systems Evaluation Tool (ISSET) 2 and stay the same at each wave. Interviewer_ID: District_ID: School_I D: **Introduction** (introduction will be repeated for each randoml y selected staff member at each wave; no identifiable information will be collected from the respondent): Hi, my name is _________ and I work with the MTSS

- B Study about behavior support practices at y our school. Do y ou have time to answer a few questions. It should take no more than five minutes. 1) What are the __________________ (school rules, high 5's, 3 bee’s)? (Define what the acron ym means) 2) Have you taught the school rules/behavioral expectations this y ear? 3) Have you given out an y ___________________________ since _______________? (rewards for appropriate behavior) (2 months ago) 4) What ty

pes of student problems do y ou or would y ou refer to the office? 5) What is the procedure for dealing with a stranger with a gun? 6) Is there a school

- wide team that addresses behavioral support in y our building? 7) Are you on the team? **Team Member Interview Questions [asked if staff member is on the behavior team]**  1) Does your team use discipline data to make decisions? (E4) 2) Has your team taught/reviewed the school

- wide program with staff this y ear? (B3) 3) Who is the team leader/facilitator? (F4) **Now I’d like to ask you some questions about students who need extra support for**

1 Sugai et al., 2005 2 Anderson et al., 2014.**behavior.**

4) Is there a process for requesting assistance from the team for a student that may need extra behavior support? Yes No If yes, what is the process?

__ ________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. Case Nos. 3:97cr103/RV/CJK

 3:97cr92/RV/CJK

 3:97cr81/RV/EMT

3:14cv183/RV/CJK

CHRISTOPHER SUMMERS

_____________________________/

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated April 17, 2014 (doc. 124). Plaintiff has been furnished a copy of the Report

and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28,

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed

objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed,

I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.

2. Defendant’s motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence, as docketed in each of

the above-styled criminal cases, is summarily DENIED and DISMISSED.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 11th day of June, 2014.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:97-cr-00092-RV-CJK Document 130 Filed 06/11/14 Page 1 of 1
|  |  |  |  |  |
|--|--|--|--|--|
|  |  |  |  |

  California

> - Compton
- Contra Costa County
- Fresno
- Los Angeles - South Central
- Los Angeles - Pico Union/Koreatown
- Oakland
- Oxnard
- Oxnard #2
- Sacramento
- Salinas
- San Jose
- San Diego
- San Francisco
- Santa Ana
- Selma

----
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A21D0107. RASHIDA STROBER v. THOMAS HARRIS.

On October 27, 2020, Rashida Strober filed this pro se application for

discretionary appeal, seeking to appeal the trial court’s August 27, 2020 order

dismissing a temporary protective order. We, however, lack jurisdiction. 

Because this action does not appear to have been brought under the Family

Violence Act,

1

 Strober appears to have a right of direct appeal because a party may

file a direct appeal from a protective order that was entered in an action brought under

the general stalking statute. See, e.g., Sinclair v. Daly, 295 Ga. App. 613 (672 SE2d

672) (2009) (reversing on direct appeal a stalking protective order entered under

OCGA § 16-5-94); Pilcher v. Stribling, 282 Ga. 166 (647 SE2d 8) (2007) (same). 

This Court ordinarily will grant an application for discretionary review of a

directly appealable order under OCGA § 5-6-35 (j). To fall within this general rule,

however, the application must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order or

judgment sought to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (d), (j). The requirements of

OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept an application for

appeal not made in compliance therewith. See Boyle v. State, 190 Ga. App. 734, 734

(380 SE2d 57) (1989). Strober’s application is untimely, as it was filed 61 days after

1 A party must file an application for discretionary appeal to obtain review of

a protective order that was entered in an action brought under the Family Violence

Act, because such cases are domestic relations cases within the meaning of OCGA

§ 5-6-35 (a) (2). See Schmidt v. Schmidt, 270 Ga. 461, 461-462 (1) (510 SE2d 810)

(1999).

November 25, 2020
entry of the order she seeks to appeal. Accordingly, this application is hereby

DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

11/25/2020
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than December 12, 2010.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Glenda Wilson, Community Affairs Officer) P.O. Box 442, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:

*1. M&P Community Bancshares, Inc. 401(k) Employee Stock Ownership Plan,*                     Newport, Arkansas; to acquire additional voting shares, for a total of 32.07 percent, of M&P Community Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire additional voting shares of Merchants and Planters Bank, both of Newport, Arkansas.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 10, 2010.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-28758 Filed 11-15-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### § 29.6089 Rule 3.

The grade of unsorted tobacco shall be based upon a representative sample of the packing. A minimum of 10 percent of the bundles or bales shall be selected at random for sampling; a higher percentage may be sampled at the discretion of the inspector. To obtain the sample, a sufficient amount of tobacco shall be drawn to be representative of each selected bale. In determining the grade, the inspector shall consider the quality of all samples. The grade assigned shall represent the quality of the lot as a whole.
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 9 , 2019

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 19 -00332- CR

ANA MARIA MEDINA, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 230th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1533756

MEMORANDUM OPINION
The trial court convicted appellant, Ana Maria Medina, in July 2017 of the third-degree felony offense of injury to an elderly individual. This court affirmed her conviction on October 9, 2018. See Medina v. State , No. 14- 17 -00638-CR, 2018 WL 4869504 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Oct. 9, 2018, no pet.) (not designated for publication).
On December 18, 2018, appellant filed a second notice of appeal from her conviction. We dismissed that appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Medina v. State ,2

No. 14- 18 -01109-CR, 2019 WL 190900 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Jan. 15, 2019, no pet.) (mem. op.) (per curiam) (not designated for publication).
Appellant subsequently filed three more notices of appeal in the trial court , on January 16, 2019, February 5, 2019, and April 12, 2019, respectively. Each notice of appeal appears to challenge the evidence underlying appellant’s conviction. Also included in the clerk’s record are (1) a handwritten document entitled “Motion to Reduce State Jail Felony to Misdemeanor Conviction,” filed January 16, 2019, and (2) an order signed February 25, 2019, releasing appellant from an intermediate sanction facility.
No authority grants us jurisdiction over a subsequent direct appeal from a conviction after we have affirmed that conviction. It does not appear appellant is trying to appeal the order releasing her from an intermediate sanction facility. There is no other appealable order in the record.
Accordingly, we DISMISS this appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists Justices Wise , Jewell, and Hassan.
#### § 28.126 Loaning of forms and exhibits.

In the discretion of the Director, limited numbers of copies of the practical forms of any of the official standards, or specially prepared exhibits illustrating any of such standards or cotton samples, may be loaned to governmental agencies for official purposes or to educational and other institutions or organizations for demonstration purposes.
#### § 29.2262 Cured.

Tobacco dried of its sap by either natural or artificial processes.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 71420]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29452]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Meeting of the Defense Policy Board

AGENCY: Defense Policy Board, DoD

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Policy Board will meet in closed session on 
December 13, 2010, from 0800 hrs until 1800 hrs and on December 14, 
2010, from 0730 hrs until 1000 hrs at the Pentagon.
    The purpose of the meeting is to provide the Secretary of Defense, 
Deputy Secretary of Defense and Under Secretary of Defense for Policy 
with independent, informed advice on major matters of defense policy. 
The Board will hold classified discussions on national security 
matters.
    In accordance with Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Public Law 92-463, as amended [5 U.S.C. App II (1982)], it has 
been determined that this meeting concerns matters listed in 5 U.S.C. 
552B (c)(1)(1982), and that accordingly this meeting will be closed to 
the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Ann Hansen, 703-571-9232.

    Dated: November 17, 2010.
Morgan F. Park,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-29452 Filed 11-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
68056834.v1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION 

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS Case No. 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC

EARPLUG PRODUCTS LIABILITY

LITIGATION Judge M. Casey Rodgers

Magistrate Judge Hope T. Cannon

This Document Relates to All Cases

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL AND REMOVAL FROM SERVICE LIST

Please take notice that Sara Anne T. Quinn hereby withdraws as counsel of record for 

Defendant 3M Company. Butler Snow LLP will remain as attorney for Defendant 3M Company.

Accordingly, the undersigned requests that the clerk remove Sara Anne T. Quinn as counsel

of record for Defendant 3M Company.

Respectfully submitted this the 7th day of March 2023.

/s/ Sara Anne T. Quinn

Sara Anne T. Quinn (#29424)

BUTLER SNOW LLP

The Pinnacle at Symphony Place

150 Third Avenue South, Suite 1600

Nashville, TN 37201

(615) 651-6700 Telephone

(615) 651-6701 Facsimile

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3694 Filed 03/07/23 Page 1 of 2
2

68056834.v1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on March 7, 2023, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of 

Court using the electronic case filing system of the Court, which will send notification of filing to 

counsel of record.

/s/ Sara Anne T. Quinn

Sara Anne T. Quinn (#29424)

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3694 Filed 03/07/23 Page 2 of 2
#### Harold E. Huff, Respondent, v. State of New York, Appellant.

(Claim No. 45545.)

Staley, Jr., J.

Appeal by the State of New York from the order of the Court of Claims which denied the State’s motion for reargument, and granted the claimant 30 days in which to file a claim for false arrest and imprisonment. The claimant was arrested on January 16, 1965, and was released on bail the following day, and was acquitted on July 12, 1965. He moved for permission to file a late claim for assault and battery and for false arrest on June 8, 1965. The motion was denied by order dated August 3, 1965 with prejudice as to the cause of action for assault and battery, and without prejudice as to the cause of action for false arrest, on the ground that the claim for false arrest did not accrue until July 12, 1965. ‘ On September 7, 1965, the motion was reargued, and the Court of Claims adhered to its original decision by order, dated November 6, 1965, and granted 30 days from the date of the order to file the claim. The State contends that the claim accrued on January 17, 1965 and not on July 12, 1965 as determined by the Court of Claims. In this contention, the State is correct. *“A*claim for false arrest accrues at the time of arraignment and release on bail.” *(Bomboy*v. *State of New York,*26 A D 2d 974; *Molyneaux*v. *County of Nassau,*22 A D 2d 954, affd. 16 N Y 2d 663.) Order denying without prejudice claimant’s motion for leave to file a late claim for damages for false arrest modified, on the law and the facts, so as to provide that such denial be with prejudice, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order denying motion for reargument dismissed as academic, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by Staley, Jr., J. [47 Misc 2d 1053.]
Exhibit
      32.2




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      ss.1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Datascension Inc. (the "Company")on Form
      10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date therein specified (the "Report")"Report"),
      I,
      David Lieberman, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
      to 18
      U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
                David LiebermanDAVID
                LIEBERMAN
              Prin.
                Accounting OfficerDated:
                April 14, 2008
#### § 28.953 Requirements as to samples.

Each sample of ginned cotton lint submitted for fiber and processing tests shall weigh approximately as shown below unless otherwise specified in the particular test item as prescribed herein:

1 ounce or more for fiber tests.

6 pounds or more for carded yarn spinning tests.

8 pounds or more for combed yarn spinning tests.

10 pounds or more for carded and combed yarn spinning tests.

Each individual sample submitted for testing shall contain a tag or coupon bearing a number or other identification symbol. Individually labeled samples may be sent in one or more parcels, each of which shall bear on the outside thereof the name and address of the person submitting it. Persons who submit samples to laboratories for testing shall comply with any Federal or State quarantine requirements applicable to counties from which such samples are shipped.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Annual  Report of IR  BioSciences  Holdings,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form  10-KSB/A for the year ended  December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Eric Hopkins,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                /S/ John Fermanis
                                -----------------------
                                Chief Financial Officer
                                November 16, 2005


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, an other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section  906,  has been  provided to Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
#### § 15.136 Decisions and notices.

When the time for submission of posthearing briefs has expired the hearing officer shall either make an initial decision or final decision, if so authorized, or certify the entire record including his recommended findings and proposed decision to the Secretary for a final decision and a copy of such initial, or final decision or certification shall be mailed to the applicant or recipient and other parties by the hearing clerk.
Exhibit 23.3

                   CONSENT OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Gary V. Campbell, CPA, Ltd.
To Whom It May Concern:

We consent  to  the  reference  to  our  firm  under the  caption
Experts in the Annual Report (Form 10KSB/A) of Datascension Inc.,
and to the incorporation by reference therein of the consolidated
financial statements of the Company included in its Annual Report
and the quarterly reports filed with the Securities and  Exchange
Commission.

We consent to the use of Datascension, Inc. on Form  10-KSB/A  of
our Auditors Report,dated March 30,2004(except for Note 2 and 17,
November 28, 2005), on  the balance sheet  of Datascension,  Inc.
as  of  December 31, 2003  and  the  related statement of  income
and accumulated deficit from January 1, 2003 to December 31,2003,
changes in stockholders equity, and cash flows for the year ended
December 31, 2003.

/s/ Gary V. Campbell, CPA
-------------------------
Gary V. Campbell, CPA, Ltd.


February 7, 2006
#### § 29.92 Record of filing time.

When an appeal is filed, the date and time of filing shall be recorded by the officer receiving it.