alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

INDEPENDENT PARTY

OF FLORIDA,

and

PARTY FOR SOCIALISM

AND LIBERATION,

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No. 4:20cv110-MW/MAF

LAUREL M. LEE, Florida

Secretary of State, in her

official capacity,

Defendant.

_________________________/

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

Plaintiffs challenge the application of section 103.021(4), Florida Statutes 

(“Ballot Access Statute”), to keep their candidates for President and Vice President 

from being listed on Florida’s November 2020 general election ballot. Plaintiffs 

claim the Ballot Access Statute violates their First and Fourteenth Amendment rights 

to association, free speech, political activity, and their respective members’ rights to 

vote for the candidates of their choice because neither the affiliation method nor the 

petitions signed by one percent of the state electors method is narrowly tailored to 

further a legitimate state interest. Plaintiffs also claim the Ballot Access Statute 

violates the Equal Protection Clause because it discriminates amongst minor parties 

Case 4:20-cv-00110-MW-MAF Document 37 Filed 06/08/20 Page 1 of 2
2

by treating minor parties that are not affiliated with a national party differently than 

minor parties that are affiliated with a national party, and affiliation with a national 

party is not rationally related to any legitimate state interest in regulating access to

the Presidential ballot.

Secretary Lee moves to dismiss arguing, among other things, that 1) the 

Eleventh Circuit has already upheld the one percent petition threshold as well as a 

more onerous three percent petition threshold, and 2) the affiliation alternative is 

rationally related to a legitimate state interest. 

The Eleventh Circuit has flatly rejected the use of a “litmus-paper test” 

approach in determining whether petition requirements pass constitutional muster. 

Stated otherwise, the determination of whether such a statutory scheme imposes a 

sever burden rendering it constitutionally impaired is a fact-intensive inquiry. 

Plaintiffs have plausibly alleged the Ballot Access Statute imposes a severe burden 

and the Eleventh Circuit has not previously upheld the precise statutory scheme at 

issue. Moreover, Plaintiffs have plausibly alleged the affiliation alternative is not 

rationally related to a legitimate state interest. For these reasons, Defendant’s 

Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 8, is DENIED.

SO ORDERED on June 8, 2020.

s/Mark E. Walker 

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00110-MW-MAF Document 37 Filed 06/08/20 Page 2 of 2
# L_2020291EN.01000101.xml

| 7.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 291/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 291/1

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) 2020/1252

of 2 September 2020

establishing a fisheries closure for cod in Norwegian waters of 1 and 2 for vessels flying the flag of Spain

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Council Regulation (EU) 2020/123 (2) lays down quotas for 2020. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Council Regulation (EU) 2020/123 (2) lays down quotas for 2020.

| (2) | According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock of cod in Norwegian waters of 1 and 2 by vessels flying the flag of or registered in Spain have exhausted the quota allocated for 2020. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock of cod in Norwegian waters of 1 and 2 by vessels flying the flag of or registered in Spain have exhausted the quota allocated for 2020.

| (3) | It is therefore necessary to prohibit certain fishing activities for that stock, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

It is therefore necessary to prohibit certain fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to Spain for the stock of cod in Norwegian waters of 1 and 2 for 2020 referred to in the Annex shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.

Article 2

Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in Article 1 by vessels flying the flag of or registered in Spain shall be prohibited from the date set out in the Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.

Article 3

Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 2 September 2020.

For the Commission,

On behalf of the President,

Virginijus SINKEVIČIUS

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

(2)  Council Regulation (EU) 2020/123 of 27 January 2020 fixing for 2020 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, for Union fishing vessels, in certain non-Union waters (OJ L 25, 30.1.2020, p. 1).

2

---

ANNEX

| No | 11/TQ123 |
| --- | --- |
| Member State | Spain |
| Stock | COD/1N2AB. |
| Species | Cod (Gadus morhua) |
| Zone | Norwegian waters of 1 and 2 |
| Closing date | 18.8.2020 |

No

11/TQ123

Member State

Spain

Stock

COD/1N2AB.

Species

Cod (Gadus morhua)

Zone

Norwegian waters of 1 and 2

Closing date

18.8.2020

---
#### Rock Island Plow Company, appellee, v. E. C. Smith and Louise B. Smith, appellants.

Gen. No. 8,832.

*631Opinion filed October 10, 1934.

Rehearing denied January 2, 1935.

Gunn, Penwell & Lindley, for appellants. Charles Troup, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Allaben

delivered the opinion of the court.
[X]   ANNUALREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF1934

 

 

or

 

[ ]   TRANSITIONREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF1934

 

 

 

 

Indicate by check mark ifthe registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of theSecurities Act. Yes [ ] No [X]

 

Indicate by check mark ifthe registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)of the Exchange Act. Yes [ ] No [X]

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file suchreports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90days. Yes [X] No [ ]

 

Indicate by check mark ifdisclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is notcontained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’sknowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated byreference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.[X]

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of“large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company”in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicate by check markwhether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of theExchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X]

 

State the aggregate marketvalue of the voting and non-voting partnership interests held by non-affiliatescomputed by reference to the price at which the partnership interests were lastsold, or the average bid and asked prices of such partnership interests as ofthe last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscalquarter.  No market exists for the limited partnership interests of theRegistrant, and, therefore, no aggregate market value can bedetermined.

 

**DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BYREFERENCE**

**None**
MOTION DOCKET

96-1421.

#### State ex rel. Ooten v. Siegel Interior Specialist Co.

Franklin App. No. 95APD05-607. On request for oral argument. Request denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2337 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2337

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen

                                 An Act

 
     To provide for the conveyance of the Forest Service Lake Hill 
             Administrative Site in Summit County, Colorado.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Lake Hill Administrative Site 
Affordable Housing Act''.
SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.
    In this Act:
        (1) County.--The term ``County'' means Summit County, Colorado.
        (2) Lake hill administrative site.--The term ``Lake Hill 
    Administrative Site'' means the parcel of approximately 40 acres of 
    National Forest System land in the County, as depicted on the map 
    entitled ``Lake Hill Administrative Site'' and dated June 2012.
        (3) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of 
    Agriculture.
SEC. 3. CONVEYANCE OF FOREST SERVICE LAKE HILL ADMINISTRATIVE SITE, 
SUMMIT COUNTY, COLORADO.
    (a) Conveyance Authority.--Upon receipt of an offer from the County 
in which the County agrees to the condition imposed by subsection (c), 
the Secretary shall use the authority provided by the Forest Service 
Facility Realignment and Enhancement Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-54; 16 
U.S.C. 580d note) to convey to the County all right, title, and 
interest of the United States in and to the Forest Service Lake Hill 
Administrative Site.
    (b) Application of Law.--
        (1) Treatment as administrative site.--The Lake Hill 
    Administrative Site is considered to be an administrative site 
    under section 502(1)(A) of the Forest Service Facility Realignment 
    and Enhancement Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-54; 16 U.S.C. 580d 
    note).
        (2) Exception.--Section 502(1)(C) of that Act does not apply to 
    the conveyance of the Lake Hill Administrative Site.
    (c) Costs.--The County shall be responsible for processing and 
transaction costs related to the direct sale under subsection (a).
    (d) Proceeds.--Proceeds received from the conveyance pursuant to 
subsection (a) shall be available, without further appropriation and 
until expended, for capital improvement and maintenance of Forest 
Service facilities in Region 2 of the United States Forest Service.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Exhibit 32.1





Certification
of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant
to


Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2009 (the “Report”) of ATS Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Edward H.
Bersoff, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.





Date:
      May 11, 2009
              By:
              /s/ Edward H. BersoffEdward
      H. BersoffChairman
      and Chief Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2345 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to prohibit the transfer or reprogramming of discretionary appropriations made available to the Internal Revenue Service, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 12, 2013 

Mr. TURNER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committees on Oversight and Government Reform and Appropriations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of 

such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to prohibit the transfer or reprogramming of discretionary appropriations 

made available to the Internal Revenue Service, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘The Stop Internal Re5 source Slush Fund Act’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 2345 IH

1 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO PROHIBIT THE TRANSFER OR RE2 PROGRAMMING OF FUNDS MADE AVAILABLE 

3 TO THE IRS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 95 of title 5, United 

5 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing: 

7 ‘‘§ 9511. Prohibition on transfer or reprogramming of 

8 funds 

9 ‘‘(a) PROHIBITION.—Notwithstanding any other pro10 vision of law, and in accordance with subsection (b), none 

11 of the funds made available to the Internal Revenue Serv12 ice shall be eligible for transfer or reprogramming if such 

13 funds are derived from— 

14 ‘‘(1) fees for services provided by the Internal 

15 Revenue Service; 

16 ‘‘(2) discretionary appropriations for salaries 

17 and expenses or other personnel and hiring pro18 grams; or 

19 ‘‘(3) reimbursable programs. 

20 ‘‘(b) DEFICIT REDUCTION.—On the date that is 90 

21 days after the last day of the fiscal year in which such 

22 funds were collected or made available, any unobligated 

23 amounts derived from subsection (a)(1), (a)(2), or (a)(3) 

24 are rescinded and shall be returned to the general fund 

25 of the Treasury for the sole purpose of deficit reduction.’’. 

26 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•HR 2345 IH

1 (1) The table of sections for chapter 95 of title 

2 5, United States Code, is amended by inserting after 

3 the item relating to section 9510 the following: 

‘‘9511. Internal Revenue Service personnel limitations.’’. 

4 (2) The heading for chapter 95 of title 5, 

5 United States Code, is amended by inserting ‘‘AND 

6 REQUIREMENTS’’ after ‘‘FLEXIBILITIES’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 224 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 224

   To terminate the authority of the Secretary of Housing and Urban 
  Development to provide assistance under the Tenant Resource Network 
                                Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 14, 2013

  Mrs. Black introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To terminate the authority of the Secretary of Housing and Urban 
  Development to provide assistance under the Tenant Resource Network 
                                Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop Tenant Organizing Promotion 
Act''.

SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF AUTHORITY TO PROVIDE ASSISTANCE UNDER THE TENANT 
              RESOURCE NETWORK PROGRAM.

    (a) Termination of Authority.--Notwithstanding any other provision 
of law, after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 
Housing and Urban Development may not carry out, support, or otherwise 
provide any assistance to the Tenant Resource Network Program 
authorized under section 514(f)(3) of the Department of Veterans 
Affairs and Housing and Urban Development, and Independent Agencies 
Appropriations Act, 1998 (Public Law 105-65; 111 Stat. 1392).
    (b) Repeal of Funding Provision for the Tenant Resource Network 
Program.--Section 514(f)(3) of the Department of Veterans Affairs and 
Housing and Urban Development, and Independent Agencies Appropriations 
Act, 1998 is repealed.
    (c) Deficit Reduction.--Any funds made available under section 
514(f)(3) of the Department of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban 
Development, and Independent Agencies Appropriations Act, 1998 that 
have been allocated for use, but not yet obligated as of the date of 
the enactment of this Act, for the Tenant Resource Network Program 
shall not be available for obligation or expenditure under such 
Program, but should be covered into the General Fund of the Treasury 
and should be used only for reducing the budget deficit of the Federal 
Government.
                                 <all>
```
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2243 

To authorize the Secretary of the Air Force to make competitive grants 

to support research and development, education, and training to produce 

a bio-based aviation fuel for use by the Air Force. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 4, 2013 

Mr. ENYART introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of the Air Force to make competitive grants to support research and development, education, and training to produce a bio-based aviation fuel 

for use by the Air Force. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. BIO-BASED AVIATION FUEL RESEARCH AND DE4 VELOPMENT, EDUCATION, AND TRAINING EF5 FORTS. 

6 (a) COMPETITIVE GRANTS AUTHORIZED.— 

7 (1) AUTHORIZATION AND PRIMARY PURPOSE.— 

8 The Secretary of the Air Force may make a grant, 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2243 IH

1 on a competitive basis, to an existing biofuels re2 search center in the United States to conduct pilot3 scale research, development, and testing of bio-based 

4 fuels that are suitable for use by the Air Force as 

5 an aviation fuel for jet aircraft. 

6 (2) ADDITIONAL PURPOSES.—Grant funds pro7 vided under paragraph (1) may also be used by the 

8 grant recipient to train military and civilian per9 sonnel in the new technologies and to conduct a 

10 study regarding the economic feasibility of a full11 scale bio-based aviation fuel production facility. 

12 (b) GRANT APPLICATIONS AND SELECTION.— 

13 (1) IN GENERAL.—Grant applicants shall sub14 mit an application to the Secretary of the Air Force 

15 at such time, in such manner, and accompanied by 

16 such information as the Secretary may reasonably 

17 require. 

18 (2) SELECTION PREFERENCE.—In conducting 

19 the competition for selection of the grant recipient, 

20 the Secretary shall give a preference to an existing 

21 biofuels research center in the United States that— 

22 (A) has the capacity and expertise nec23 essary to quickly and efficiently conduct the 

24 pilot-scale research, development, and testing 

25 described in subsection (a)(1); and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2243 IH

1 (B) is located in close proximity to— 

2 (i) the raw materials specified in sub3 paragraph (B) of subsection (a)(1); 

4 (ii) a military installation with respon5 sibility for military air transportation; and 

6 (iii) a private or commercial airport 

7 with capacity to host a research and pilot 

8 production facility. 

9 (c) GRANT AMOUNTS.—Grants under subsection (a) 

10 may not exceed a total $25,000,000. With the approval 

11 of the Secretary of the Air Force, grant funds may be 

12 used for infrastructure to facilitate the pilot-scale re13 search, development, and testing described in subsection 

14 (a)(1). 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2411 

To prohibit the Federal Government from contracting with an entity that 

has committed fraud or certain other crimes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 18, 2013 

Mr. GRAYSON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Federal Government from contracting with 

an entity that has committed fraud or certain other crimes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON CONTRACTING WITH CON4 TRACTORS THAT HAVE COMMITTED FRAUD 

5 OR CERTAIN OTHER CRIMES. 

6 The Federal Government may not enter into a con7 tract with an offeror or any of its principals if the offeror 

8 certifies that it, or any of its principals— 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2411 IH

1 (1) within a three-year period preceding this 

2 offer has been convicted of or had a civil judgment 

3 rendered against it for— 

4 (A) commission of fraud or a criminal of5 fense in connection with obtaining, attempting 

6 to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, 

7 State, or local) contract or subcontract; 

8 (B) violation of Federal or State antitrust 

9 statutes relating to the submission of offers; or 

10 commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, 

11 bribery, falsification or destruction of records, 

12 making false statements, tax evasion, violating 

13 Federal criminal tax laws; or 

14 (C) receiving stolen property; 

15 (2) are presently indicted for, or otherwise 

16 criminally or civilly charged by a governmental enti17 ty with, commission of any of the offenses described 

18 in paragraph (1); or 

19 (3) within a three-year period preceding this 

20 offer, have been notified of any delinquent Federal 

21 taxes in an amount that exceeds $3,000 for which 

22 the liability remains unsatisfied. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.18

                                January 20, 2005

Jon S. Saltzman
435 Dreshertown Road
Ft. Washington, PA 19034

Dear Jon:

This is to confirm that upon the Closing you will assume the position of
President of United America Indemnity, Ltd., and the terms of the executive
employment agreement between you and Penn-America Group, Inc, dated as of
October 14, 2004 (the "Agreement") shall continue. Please acknowledge these
plans by signing and returning this letter to me. Capitalized terms used herein
shall have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.

Sincerely,

/s/ David Bradley
-----------------------------------
David Bradley
CEO, United America Indemnity, Ltd.

ACCEPTED AND AGREED:

/s/ Jon S. Saltzman
-----------------------------------
Jon S. Saltzman
#### § 29.3030 Greenish (V).

A color term applied to greenish-tinged tobacco. Any leaf which has a greenish tinge or a pale green color affecting 20 percent or more of its surface may be described as greenish. (See Rule 17.)

[24 FR 8771, Oct. 29, 1959. Redesignated at 49 FR 16757, Apr. 20, 1984]