alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
                    OF CANTERBURY CORPORATE SERVICES, INC.

Canterbury Career Schools, Inc. (inactive)
Canterbury Career Schools of Sacramento, Inc. (inactive)
Canterbury Career Schools of Pittsburgh, Inc. (inactive)
Canterbury Management Group, Inc.
Scholastic Partners, Inc. (inactive)
Educational Advisors, Inc. (inactive)
Star Label Products, Inc. (shell)
Clark Training Corp. (inactive)
MSI/Canterbury Corp. 
Empire Career Center, Inc. (inactive)
Canterbury Career Schools of Lauderdale (inactive)
CALC/Canterbury Corp.
Prosoft/Canterbury Corp.
Nevada Training Corp.
Vocational Education Corp. d/b/a American Trucking Academy
#### DIETRICH v. HEIM.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 12, 1906.)

Action by Justus Dietrich against Sophie S. Heim.

No opinion. Motion granted, with $10 costs. Order filed.
|   |        |   |   |   |   | RIDGEWOOD ENERGY P FUND, LLC                    |
|--------|-------------|--------|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
| Dated: | May 6, 2010 | By:    | /s/    |   |   | ROBERT E. SWANSON                                    |
|   |        |   | Name:  |   |   | Robert E. Swanson                                    |
|   |        |   | Title: |   |   | Chief Executive Officer                              |
|   |        |   |   |   |   | (Principal Executive Officer)                        |
|   |        |   |   |   |   |                                                 |
|   |        |   |   |   |   |                                                 |
| Dated: | May 6, 2010 | By:    | /s/    |   |   | KATHLEEN P. MCSHERRY                                 |
|   |        |   | Name:  |   |   | Kathleen P. McSherry                                 |
|   |        |   | Title: |   |   | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |        |   |   |   |   | (Principal Financial Officer)                        |
|   |        |   |   |   |   |                                                 |
|   |        |   |   |   |   |                                                 |

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In  connection  with  the  IGENE Biotechnology,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB for  the  period  ended
December  31,  2004,  as filed with the Securities  and  Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen F.  Hiu,
President  of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as  adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies  with  the requirements of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The  information  contained   in  the   Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: October 06, 2005               By: /s/STEPHEN F. HIU
                                         ________________________
                                            STEPHEN F. HIU
                                            President


A  signed original of this written statement required by  Section
906  has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company  and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
or its staff upon request.
```

[108th Congress Public Law 303]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ303.108]

[[Page 118 STAT. 1124]]

Public Law 108-303
108th Congress

                                 An Act

 
Making emergency supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 2004, for additional disaster assistance. <<NOTE: Sept. 8, 
                         2004 -  [H.R. 5005]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Emergency 
Supplemental Appropriations for Disaster Relief Act, 2004.>> That the 
following sums are appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury not 
otherwise appropriated, for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2004, 
to provide emergency supplemental appropriations for additional disaster 
assistance, namely:

   DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE

                             Disaster Relief

    For an additional amount for ``Disaster Relief'', $2,000,000,000, to 
remain available until expended, of which up to $30,000,000 may be 
transferred to ``Small Business Administration--Salaries and Expenses'', 
for administrative expenses to carry out the disaster loans program 
authorized by section 7(b) of the Small Business Act: Provided, That the 
amounts provided herein are designated as an emergency requirement 
pursuant to section 402 of S. Con. Res. 95 (108th Congress), as made 
applicable to the House of Representatives by H.Res. 649 (108th 
Congress) and applicable to the Senate by section 14007 of Public Law 
108-287.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Emergency Supplemental Appropriations 
for Disaster Relief Act, 2004''.

    Approved September 8, 2004.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5005:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):
            Sept. 7, considered and passed House and Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### § 28.175 Administrative and general.

Insofar as applicable, and not inconsistent with this subpart, the provisions of subpart A of this part shall likewise apply to the classification and comparison of foreign-growth cotton. For the purposes of this subpart, foreign-growth cotton is defined as either cotton produced outside the continental United States or cotton produced in the continental United States but it is stored in and sample submitted for classification from location outside the continental United States.

[81 FR 7030, Feb. 10, 2016]
Page 1 of 2

1

Defendant’s notice of appeal was due ten days after entry of the order. 

Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A)(I). The ten-day period excludes weekends and

holidays. Fed. R. App. P. 26(a). Taking these two rules together, Defendant’s

notice of appeal was required to be filed on or before May 8, 2008. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO.: 4:02cr52-SPM

ERIC EUGENE BALCOM,

Defendant.

____________________________/

ORDER FINDING NO EXCUSABLE NEGLECT OR GOOD CAUSE

The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has remanded jurisdiction back to

this Court for a determination of whether Defendant’s untimely1 notice of appeal,

deemed filed on June 4, 2008, should nevertheless be accepted under Federal

Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(b)(4). Defendant was given an opportunity to

show good cause or excusable neglect for the late filing. His response (doc.

118) takes the position that his notice of appeal was timely filed in that it was sent

to the clerk of court before May 8, 2008. This position is refuted by the June 4,

2008 date that Defendant placed on the notice of appeal (doc. 108) and the June

6, 2008 stamped post-mark date on the envelope. Defendant provides no

Case 4:02-cr-00052-RH-CAS Document 119 Filed 09/17/08 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

CASE NO.: 4:02cr52-SPM

explanation for the inconsistent dates. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: No excusable neglect or good cause exists

to accept Defendant’s untimely notice of appeal under Federal Rule of Appellate

Procedure 4(b)(4).

DONE AND ORDERED this 17th day of September, 2008.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 4:02-cr-00052-RH-CAS Document 119 Filed 09/17/08 Page 2 of 2
98-1596.

#### State ex rel. Wilson v. Ghee.

In Mandamus. On answer of respondent. Answer treated as motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS

EARPLUG PRODUCTS

LIABILITY LITIGATION

Case No. 3:19-md-2885

This document relates to:

Aaron A. Neglia

Judge M. Casey Rodgers

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones

Case No. 8:20-cv-09830

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

Comes now STEVE N. SNYDER, with the law firm of WILLIAMS MCDANIEL, 

PLLC, and gives notice that he will appear as counsel of record for Aaron A. Neglia in the 

Master Docket pursuant to Pretrial Order No. 3 [ECF No. 4]. Mr. Snyder has completed the 

administrative requirements outlined in Pretrial Order No. 3, and has been granted admission 

pro hac vice pursuant to paragraph IV.A of Pretrial Order No. 3. Counsel respectfully requests 

that all notices, correspondence, filings and other papers in the Master Docket of MDL 2885 

be served upon him at the address listed below.

This the 23rd day of January, 2023.

Respectfully submitted, 

WILLIAMS McDANIEL, PLLC

By: /s/ Steve N. Snyder 

Steve N. Snyder (#025703)

717 S. White Station Road, Suite 1

Memphis, Tennessee 38117

(901) 766-0887 (Phone)

(901) 766-0915 (Facsimile)

ssnyder@williamsmcdaniel.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3639 Filed 01/23/23 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 23rd day of January, 2023, a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of Court and served using the CM/ECF 

system.

/s/ Steve N. Snyder

Steve N. Snyder

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3639 Filed 01/23/23 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 231 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 231

  To reauthorize the programs of the Department of Housing and Urban 
        Development for housing assistance for Native Hawaiians.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 14, 2013

 Ms. Hanabusa introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To reauthorize the programs of the Department of Housing and Urban 
        Development for housing assistance for Native Hawaiians.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Hawaiian Homeownership Opportunity 
Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR HOUSING ASSISTANCE.

    Section 824 of the Native American Housing Assistance and Self-
Determination Act of 1996 (25 U.S.C. 4243), as added by section 513 of 
Public Law 106-569 (114 Stat. 2969), is amended by striking ``fiscal 
years'' and all that follows and inserting the following: ``fiscal 
years 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017.''.

SEC. 3. LOAN GUARANTEES FOR NATIVE HAWAIIAN HOUSING.

    Section 184A of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992 
(12 U.S.C. 1715z-13b), as added by section 514 of Public Law 106-569 
(114 Stat. 2989), is amended as follows:
            (1) Authorization of appropriations.--In subsection (j)(7), 
        by striking ``fiscal years'' and all that follows and inserting 
        the following: ``fiscal years 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, and 
        2017.''.
            (2) Authority.--In subsection (b), by striking ``or as a 
        result of a lack of access to private financial markets''.
            (3) Eligible housing.--In subsection (c), by striking 
        paragraph (2) and inserting the following new paragraph:
            ``(2) Eligible housing.--The loan will be used to 
        construct, acquire, refinance, or rehabilitate 1- to 4-family 
        dwellings that are standard housing and are located on Hawaiian 
        Home Lands.''.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 1942
Editorial Notes: Nomenclature changes to part 1942 appear at 80 FR 9878, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1942.3 Preparation of appraisal reports. When the loan approval official requires an appraisal, Form RD 442-10, “Appraisal Report—Water and Waste Disposal Systems,” may be used with appropriate supplements. Form RD 442-10 may be modified as appropriate or other appropriate format may be used for facilities other than water and waste disposal. Appraisal reports prepared for use in connection with the purchase of existing essential community facilities or when required by § 1942.17 (g)(2)(iii)(B)( 2 ), (g)(3)(iii)(B)( 2 ), and (j)(4) of this subpart, may be prepared by the RD engineer/architect or, if desired by the State Director, some other qualified appraiser. The loan approval official may require an applicant to provide an appraisal prepared by an independent qualified appraiser; however, the loan approval official must determine that the appraised value shown in such reports reflects the present market value. [50 FR 7296, Feb. 22, 1985, as amended at 53 FR 6786, Mar. 3, 1988]
EXCEPTIONAL EVENT REQUESTS BY REGION, 20

Region 10- 276 -----------

Region 

)ource: US EPA's Air Qlllality Systems (AQS) database (March 27, 20 15). Numbers shown are a sum of days flagg

he region, from Januaty 1, 2011 to December 31, 2013. Numbers include concuned and non-concurred event flag

event requests during 2011-2013. AIR1500034.xlsx
*Friday, September 25, 1998*

MOTION DOCKET

98-1756.

#### Amada, Inc. v. Zaggario.

Cuyahoga App. No. 73089. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for stay,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for stay be, and hereby is, denied.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

MATHEW SELOVER,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:20cv4698-TKW-HTC

ESCAMBIA COUNTY BOARD

OF COMMISSIONERS and

RAYME EDLER,

Defendants.

_________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME

This case is before the Court on Defendants’ motions for extensions of time 

to respond to the complaint (Docs. 5, 6). Defendant Escambia County Board of 

County Commissioners seeks a 7-day extension, and Defendant Rayme Edler seeks 

a 30-day extension. Plaintiff does not oppose the 7-day extension, but he does 

oppose the 30-day extension. Because the Edler motion is opposed, the Court would 

normally hold it for 14 days so Plaintiff could file a response, see N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 

7.1(E); however, under the circumstances, the Court sees no prejudice to Plaintiff in 

ruling on the motion without awaiting a response. Indeed, by the time the Court held 

the motion for 14 days and ruled on it, Edler would have effectively received the 21-

day extension that the Court is granting in this Order. Moreover, under the 

circumstances detailed in the motion, the Court cannot imagine anything that 

Case 3:20-cv-04698-TKW-HTC Document 7 Filed 03/24/20 Page 1 of 2
2

Plaintiff could say in a response that would change the Court’s mind as to the 

appropriate disposition of the motion. Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED that:

1. Defendant Escambia County’s Board of County Commissioners’ motion 

(Doc. 5) is GRANTED, and it shall have until March 30, 2020, to respond to 

the complaint.

2. Defendant Rayme Edler’s motion (Doc. 6) is GRANTED in part, and she 

shall have until April 13, 2020, to respond to the complaint.

DONE and ORDERED this 24th day of March, 2020.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-04698-TKW-HTC Document 7 Filed 03/24/20 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Barry Hollingsworth, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BabyUniverse, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other
certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



Date: December 18, 2007/s/ Barry HollingsworthBarry HollingsworthChief Financial Officer
#### § 29.2503 Body.

The thickness and density of a leaf or the weight per unit of surface. (See chart, § 29.2601.)
Exhibit 32.1

Section 1350 Certification

                   The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the Form  10-K of RFMC Willowbridge Fund, L.P. pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350).

                  The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-K fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act  of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in the Form 10-K  fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results  of operations of RFMC Willowbridge Fund, L.P.

March 30, 2007

/s/ Robert L. Lerner                                   Robert L. Lerner  President  Ruvane Fund Management Corporation,  the general partner of   RFMC Willowbridge Fund, L.P.
#### Toni M. Cataldo, Appellant, v Lawrence C. Kolb et al., Defendants, and Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Respondent.

—Orders, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on April 10, 1979, and June 22, 1979, respectively, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements, and appeal from order of said court, entered on January 3,1980, unanimously dismissed as nonappealable, without costs and without disbursements. No opinion. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sandler, Markewich, Bloom and Yesawich, JJ.
Exhibit 10.2

                 Summary Sheet of Executive Officer Compensation
                 -----------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                      Bonus (aggregated
                                         basis)/Plan         Other Annual
   Executive Officer      Base Salary   Compensation         Compensation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Robert H. Bucher,       $340,000    *               $730 Group Term Life
CEO and Chairman                                       Insurance Excess Premiums
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Robert R. Strickland,   $230,050    *               $1,472 Group Term Life
CFO                                                    Insurance Excess Premiums
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Matthew Murphy, VP      $268,800    *               $672 Group Term Life
Operations                                             Insurance Excess Premiums

                                                       $7,869 Automobile
                                                       Allowance
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. John Dulchinos, VP      $169,060    *               $30,000 Housing Allowance
& Gen Mgr, Robotics
                                                       $287 Group Term Life
                                                       Insurance Excess Premiums

                                                       $7,869 Automobile
                                                       Allowance
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Lee Blake, VP & Gen     $192,600    *               $1,441 Group Term Life
Mgr, Service                                           Insurance Excess Premiums
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. Gordon Deans, VP        $149,877    *
Bus Dev & Gen Mgr,
Adept Canada
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7. Joachim Melis, VP       $128,842    *               $11,489 Automobile
Europe                                                 Allowance
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

*As determined pursuant to the Adept Technology, Inc. Executive Bonus Plan.
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Notes:

1. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 83 FR 22178, May 14, 2018.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 83 FR 61310, Nov. 29, 2018

3. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 85 FR 65504, Oct. 15, 2020.

4. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 87 FR 44266, July 26, 2022.

#### § 2.13 Status of prior delegations.

Nothing in this part shall affect the bylaws of the Commodity Credit Corporation, the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, or the Rural Telephone Bank. All delegations previously made which are inconsistent with delegations made in this part are superseded; however, any regulation, order, authorization, expenditure, or other instrument, heretofore issued or made pursuant to any delegation of authority shall continue in full force and effect unless and until withdrawn or superseded pursuant to authority granted in this part.
#### § 29.1132 Rule 26.

Tobacco that contains a moderate amount of dirt or sand, but which otherwise meets the specifications of any Primings grade, including the first quality Nondescript from the Primings group, shall be designated by placing the special factor, “dirt” or “sand” after the grademark.