alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 28.60 Surrender of memoranda or certificates.

For good cause, any memorandum or certificate issued under this subpart shall be surrendered to the Area Director of the Classing Office which issued it, upon the Area Director's request or upon the request of the Director. A new memorandum or certificate complying with this subpart may be issued in substitution therefor. If such memorandum or certificate be not surrendered upon such request, it shall nevertheless be invalid for the purposes of the act and this subpart.

[52 FR 30882, Aug. 18, 1987]
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 181 (Wednesday, September 18, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 57293]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-22685]

[[Page 57293]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

42 CFR Part 7

[Docket No. CDC-2013-0013]
RIN 0920-AA52

Distribution of Reference Biological Standards and Biological 
Preparations

AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (HHS/CDC), 
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

ACTION: Confirmation of effective date of direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) within 
the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is publishing this 
document to confirm the effective date of the Direct Final Rule (DFR), 
published on July 22, 2013 (78 FR 43817).

DATES: The Direct Final Rule published at 78 FR 43817, July 22, 2013, 
will become effective on September 20, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions concerning this 
document: Dr. Carolyn M. Black, M.D., Division of Scientific Resources, 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE., 
Mailstop C-17, Atlanta, Georgia 30333; telephone 404-639-3466.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 22, 2013, HHS/CDC published a Direct 
Final Rule (DFR) amending 42 CFR part 7 to update the agency name, 
address, and contact information for that part (78 FR 43817. In that 
document, HHS/CDC indicated that if we did not receive any significant 
adverse comments on the direct final rule by August 21, 2013, we would 
publish a document in the Federal Register confirming the effective 
date of the direct final rule within 30 days after the end of the 
comment period. HHS/CDC did not receive significant adverse comment to 
the DFR. Therefore, consistent with the Direct Final Rule, the updated 
agency name and address and contact information for 42 CFR part 7 will 
become effective on September 20, 2013 (78 FR 43817).

    Dated: September 11, 2013.
Kathleen Sebelius,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-22685 Filed 9-17-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
```
**Exhibit31.2****CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, Paul J. Cornell, certify that:1) I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Quintana Maritime Limited. 2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions); a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.     By:          /s/ Paul J. Cornell     Paul J. Cornell  Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer   Date: May 15, 2006
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF THECHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OFGLOBAL PARTNERS LPPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-Qfor the period ended June 30, 2009 of Global Partners LP (the “Partnership”)and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Eric Slifka, President and Chief Executive Officer of Global GP LLC, thegeneral partner of the Partnership, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 
| Dated:  August 7, 2009 | By:    | /s/  Eric Slifka                                                |
|-----------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                        |   |       Eric Slifka                           |
|                        |   |       President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                        |   |       of Global GP LLC, general partner     |
|                        |   |       of Global Partners LP                 |

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. Case No. 1:90cr1006-MW/GRJ-2

JOHNNY SALAZAR STUART,

Defendant/Petitioner.

_________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and 

Recommendation, ECF No. 133, and has also reviewed de novo Petitioner’s

objections to the report and recommendation, ECF No. 133. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted, over Petitioner’s 

objections, as this Court’s opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “The 

Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a 

Person in Federal Custody, ECF No. 119, is DENIED and DISMISSED as 

untimely. A Certificate of Appealability is DENIED.” The Clerk shall close the 

file. 

SO ORDERED on April 2, 2019.

s/Mark E. Walker ____

Chief United States District Judge
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;
 c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and
 d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and
 b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Steven J. MalcolmSteven J. MalcolmChief Executive Officer of Williams Partners GP LLC,
general partner of Williams Partners L.P.(Principal Executive Officer)
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 1:88-cr-01007-MP-GRJ-3

RUFUS C. ROCHELL, 

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration. (Doc. 1463). 

Defendant Rochell requests that the Court reconsider its September 1, 2012 order denying

motion for sentence reduction, pursuant to Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

Rule 59(e) permits a motion to alter or amend a judgment within twenty-eight (28) days of entry

of the judgment. However, the judgment in this case was entered on October 21, 1988 and the

defendant requests reconsideration of an order of the Court. Thus, Rule 60(b) is the proper

vehicle for defendant’s motion.

 Pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, "the court may relieve a

party . . . from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for . . . (6) any [ ] reason that justifies

relief." Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). However, "relief under [Rule 60(b)(6)] is an extraordinary remedy

which may be invoked only upon a showing of exceptional circumstances," and "absent such

relief, an extreme and unexpected hardship will result." Griffin v. Swim-Tech Corp., 722 F.2d

677, 680 (11th Cir. 1984). Even when such circumstances exist, "whether to grant the requested

relief is a matter for the district court's sound discretion." Mock v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.,

373 Fed. Appx. 989, 991 (11th Cir. 2010).

Case 1:88-cr-01007-MW-GRJ Document 1465 Filed 10/02/12 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

The defendant has failed to show any exceptional circumstances that would justify relief

under Rule 60(b).

Accordingly, defendant's motion for reconsideration (doc. 1463) is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 2nd day of October, 2012

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case No: 1:88-cr-01007-MP-GRJ-3

Case 1:88-cr-01007-MW-GRJ Document 1465 Filed 10/02/12 Page 2 of 2
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

)

INDEPENDENT PARTY OF )

FLORIDA and PARTY FOR )

SOCIALISM AND LIBERATION, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) Case No. 4:20-cv-00110-MW-CAS

)

LAUREL M. LEE, Florida )

Secretary of State, in her official )

capacity, )

)

Defendant. )

)

CORRECTED DECLARATION OF ERNEST Wm. BACH

I, Ernest Bach, hereby declare that:

1. My name is Ernest Bach. I make this declaration based on my 

own personal knowledge. I am competent to testify to the matters 

stated herein.

2. I reside in Largo, Florida.

3. I am the Chairman of The Independent Party of Florida.

4. I received a letter dated September 7, 2016 from the Secretary of 

State’s office indicating that the new definition of “national party” 

Case 4:20-cv-00110-MW-MAF Document 20-2 Filed 04/23/20 Page 1 of 3
2

would be enforced, notwithstanding the fact that it had not been 

previously enforced, and the Independent Party of Florida was barred 

from the presidential and vice-presidential ballot.

5. The letter filed as Exhibit B to the Declaration of Richard Winger 

is a true and correct copy of the letter I received in 2016.

6. The Independent Party of Florida was unable to appeal the 

Secretary of State’s decision to preclude the party’s candidate for 

President and Vice President before the ballots were completed

7. The Independent Party of Florida has been active in Florida since 

1993 and in 2016, timely and properly nominated Eric McMullin for 

President, however, that nomination was rejected by the Secretary of 

State because the party hadn’t met the affiliation requirement. Prior to 

2016, the Independent Party of Florida did not nominate any 

candidates because it never affiliated with a national party and the 

signature requirements for ballot access are too difficult to satisfy.

8. The Independent Party of Florida is truly independent and 

prefers to maintain complete control over which candidate is nominated 

for president on behalf of the party.

Case 4:20-cv-00110-MW-MAF Document 20-2 Filed 04/23/20 Page 2 of 3
3

9. The Independent Party of Florida cannot afford to spend the 

money or time necessary to perform a signature gathering campaign 

that satisfies 137,000 signatures. If the signature requirement is 

enforced, there will be no candidate for the Independent Party of 

Florida on the 2020 presidential ballot.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, I declare under penalty of perjury the 

foregoing is true and correct to the best of my information, knowledge 

and belief.

Dated: April 23, 2020.

 /s/ Ernest Wm. Bach

Ernest Wm. Bach

Case 4:20-cv-00110-MW-MAF Document 20-2 Filed 04/23/20 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 10.8(b)


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This First Amendment to Employment Agreement
is dated as of March 1, 2004 by and between NetBank, Inc. (the “Company”) and R. Theodore Brauch (the “Executive”).


 


The Employment Agreement between the Company
and the Executive dated as of April 1, 2002 (the “Original Employment
Agreement”) is hereby amended as follows:


 


1.  Amendment
to Term.  Section 1.10
of the Original Employment Agreement defining the term “Term” is hereby amended
and restated to read as follows:


 


“1.10                     “Term” means the period
commencing on the date hereof and ending on April 1, 2006.”


 


2.  Base Salary; Incentive Compensation.   The terms “Base Salary” and “Incentive
Compensation” as defined in Sections 1.4 and 4.2(a), respectively, are hereby
amended to reflect whatever Base Salary and Incentive Compensation that is
determined by the Chief Executive Officer and approved by the Compensation
Committee, from time to time; provided, however, that so long as the Executive
performs his or her duties and obligations satisfactorily, neither the Base
Salary nor the target percentage of Incentive Compensation shall be decreased,
without the written consent of the Executive.


 


3.  Amendment to Reflect Paid Time Off.   Section 4.3(c) of the Original
Employment Agreement setting forth benefits for vacation time is hereby amended
and restated to read as follows:


 


“(c)  
On a non-cumulative
basis, the Executive shall be entitled to such days of paid time off each year
as prescribed for similarly situated officers, during which his compensation
shall be paid in full, and which shall be taken as approved in advance by the
Company, taking into account the requirements of the Company.”


 


The amendments set forth above shall be
effective immediately.  All other terms
and provisions of the Original Employment Agreement shall remain unaffected by
this Amendment.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have
hereunto set their hands as of the date first above written.


 


	
  COMPANY:

  	
  EXECUTIVE:

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  NETBANK,
  INC.

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/ R. Theodore Brauch

  	
   

  
	
  By:

  	
  /s/ Douglas K. Freeman

  	
   

  	
  Name: 
  R. Theodore Brauch

  	
   

  
	
  Douglas K.
  Freeman

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Chairman and
  Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 10.l

             OTHER COMPENSATORY ARRANGEMENTS FOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

     In order to assure that the Company's senior executives are fully aware of
the tax, legal and financial implications of the Company's benefit programs, the
Company has established a program to provide senior executives with assistance
in their estate, financial and tax planning matters. Under this program, the
Company will pay up to $10,000 for such professional services each year, with a
special "carry-forward" of the second year's $10,000 allowance during the first
year to cover additional costs associated with development of an initial estate
and financial plan. The Company will inform each participant during the course
of this process as to the amount of professional fees allocated to services
performed on such participant's behalf under the program. The value of any such
services received will be taxable as ordinary income to the participant.

     The Company's named executive officers are permitted to utilize certain
Company facilities and equipment for personal purposes, if available.
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Stone Arcade AcquisitionCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Roger Stone, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive and FinancialOfficer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, asadopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of my knowledge:

(1)    The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periodcertified.

Pursuant to the rulesand regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, this certificationis being furnished and is not deemed filed.

Signed on this 14th dayof August, 2006.
|        | /s/ Roger Stone                              |
|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|   | Roger Stone                                  |
|   | Chairman and Chief  Executive Officer        |
|   | (Principal Executive  and Financial Officer) |

 

----
From: Gormas, Michael (OST) 

Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 8:48 AM

To: john.cox@prescott-az.gov; gboyd@ci.show-low.az.us; lona@cityofpage.org; 

citymanager@cityofpage.org; 'Rick Olson'

Cc: Mike Matthews; chowell@flygreatlakes.com; dvoss@flygreatlakes.com; shawn@boutiqueair.com; 

Devany, Dennis (OST); Schlemmer, Kevin (OST)

Subject: Essential Air Service at Page, Prescott, and Show Low proposals

Hello everyone,

I would like to update you on the Essential Air Service (EAS) situation at Page, Prescott, and Show Low, 

Arizona, as well as give you an opportunity to offer any comments on the record before we submit a 

recommendation to the Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs. 

We issued Order 2014-11-15 (November 25, 2014), requesting proposals from airlines interested in 

providing EAS for a new term. In response to our request, two air carriers submitted proposals: Great 

Lakes Aviation and Boutique Air (Page/Show Low only).

I have attached each air carrier’s proposal for your review and I expect them to be uploaded on 

www.regulations.gov soon. I request that you review the proposals and submit any comments you may 

have as soon as possible, but no later than Friday, February 20, 2015. Please send your comments 

directly via e-mail to michael.gormas@dot.gov. Also, please forward this to all relevant parties that I 

have not included on the distribution list. 

Please direct all questions regarding these proposals to Michael Gormas at michael.gormas@dot.gov.

Michael D. Gormas

United States Department of Transportation Office of Aviation Analysis

1200 New Jersey Ave SE

Washington, DC 20590

202.366.1853