alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsNational Combustion Code Parallel Performance EnhancementsThe National Combustion Code (NCC) is being developed by an industry-government team for the design and analysis of combustion systems. The unstructured grid, reacting flow code uses a distributed memory, message passing model for its parallel implementation. The focus of the present effort has been to improve the performance of the NCC code to meet combustor designer requirements for model accuracy and analysis turnaround time. Improving the performance of this code contributes significantly to the overall reduction in time and cost of the combustor design cycle. This report describes recent parallel processing modifications to NCC that have improved the parallel scalability of the code, enabling a two hour turnaround for a 1.3 million element fully reacting combustion simulation on an SGI Origin 2000.Document ID20020085102Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsQuealy, Angela*(QSS Group, Inc. Cleveland, OH United States)*Benyo, TheresaDate AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 2002Subject CategoryComputer Programming And SoftwareReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:211340E-13151AIAA Paper 2002-3706NASA/CR-2002-211340Meeting InformationMeeting: 38th Joint Propulsion Conference and ExhibitLocation: Indianapolis, INCountry: United StatesStart Date: July 7, 2002End Date: July 10, 2002Sponsors:American Inst. of Aeronautics and Astronautics,American Society of Mechanical Engineers,American Society for Electrical Engineers,Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc.Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 704-20-13CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS3-00145Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20020085102.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2259 

To withdraw certain Federal land and interests in that land from location, 

entry, and patent under the mining laws and disposition under the 

mineral and geothermal leasing laws and to preserve existing uses. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 5, 2013 

Mr. DAINES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To withdraw certain Federal land and interests in that land 

from location, entry, and patent under the mining laws 

and disposition under the mineral and geothermal leasing 

laws and to preserve existing uses. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘North Fork Watershed 

5 Protection Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2259 IH

1 (1) ELIGIBLE FEDERAL LAND.—The term ‘‘eli2 gible Federal land’’ means— 

3 (A) any federally owned land or interest in 

4 land depicted on the Map as within the North 

5 Fork Federal Lands Withdrawal Area; or 

6 (B) any land or interest in land located 

7 within the North Fork Federal Lands With8 drawal Area that is acquired by the Federal 

9 Government after the date of enactment of this 

10 Act. 

11 (2) MAP.—The term ‘‘Map’’ means the Bureau 

12 of Land Management map entitled ‘‘North Fork 

13 Federal Lands Withdrawal Area’’ and dated June 9, 

14 2010. 

15 SEC. 3. WITHDRAWAL. 

16 (a) WITHDRAWAL.—Subject to valid existing rights, 

17 the eligible Federal land is withdrawn from— 

18 (1) all forms of location, entry, and patent 

19 under the mining laws; and 

20 (2) disposition under all laws relating to min21 eral leasing and geothermal leasing. 

22 (b) AVAILABILITY OF MAP.—Not later than 30 days 

23 after the date of enactment of this Act, the Map shall be 

24 made available to the public at each appropriate office of 

25 the Bureau of Land Management. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2259 IH

1 SEC. 4. EXISTING USES NOT AFFECTED. 

2 Except with respect to the withdrawal under section 

3 3, nothing in this Act restricts recreational uses, livestock 

4 management activities, or forest management activities al5 lowed on the date of the enactment of this Act on the eligi6 ble Federal land in accordance with applicable law. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

RONALD EUGENE REYNOLDS,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-15-00376-CR

Appeal from

County Court at Law No. 4

of Montgomery County, Texas

(TC # 15-307892)

O R D E R

The Court has determined that it is necessary to review the original of State’s Exhibits 149 

(Client file for Kalisha Keller), 150 (Client file for George Sanchez), 151 (client file for Carolina 

Castelan), and 152 (client file for Jose and Destiny Trevino). It is therefore Ordered that Cassandra 

McCoy, Official Court Reporter of the County Court at Law Number Four for Montgomery 

County, Texas, prepare a supplemental Reporter’s Record to include the original of State’s 

Exhibits 149, 150, 151, and 152 and forward the same to this Court on or before June 26, 2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 12TH DAY OF JUNE, 2017.

PER CURIAM 

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
#### § 29.3013 Combination color symbols.

As applied to Burley, combination color symbols are as follows: FL—tannish buff, FR—tannish red, VF—greenish tan, VR—greenish red, GF—green tan, and GR—green red. (See rules 17 and 18.)

[51 FR 40407, Nov. 7, 1986]
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
Case No. 6D2 3

- 259 Lower Tribunal No. 19

- CF

- 303

_____________________________
S TANLEY J AMES G RIFFIN , Appellant
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee

.

_____________________________ Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County

.

Bruce Kyle , Judge.
April 23, 2024

PER CURIAM

.
AFFIRMED

. NARDELLA, WHITE and MIZE , JJ., c oncur.

Howard L. “Rex” Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Christopher Desrochers, Special Assistant Public Defender
, Bartow , for A ppellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Natalia Reyna

- Pimiento, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa , for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsOxide-dispersion-strengthened turbine blades. Volume 2The overall objective of Project 4 was to develop and test a high-temperature, uncooled gas turbine blade using MA6000 alloy. Production scale up of the MA6000 alloy was achieved with a fair degree of tolerance to non-optimum processing. The blade manufacturing process was also optimized. The mechanical, environmental, and physical property evaluations of MA6000 were conducted. The ultimate tensile strength, to about 704 C (1300 F), is higher than DS MAR-M 247 but with a corresponding lower tensile elongation. Also, above 982 C (1800 F) MA6000 tensile strength does not decrease as rapidly as MAR-M 247 because the ODS mechanism still remains active. Based on oxidation resistance and diffusional stability considerations, NiCrAlY coatings are recommended. CoCrAlY coating should be applied on top of a thin NiCrAlY coating if hot corrosion is expected. Vibration, whirlpit, and high-rotor-rig tests were conducted to ensure successful completion of the engine test of the MA6000 TFE731 high pressure turbine blades. Test results were acceptable. In production quantities, the cost of the Project 4 MA6000 blade is estimated to be twice that of a cast DS MAR-M 247 blade.Document ID19890009116Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsMillan, P. P., Jr.*(Garrett Turbine Engine Co. Phoenix, AZ, United States)*Mays, J. C.*(Garrett Turbine Engine Co. Phoenix, AZ, United States)*Humbert, D. R.*(Garrett Turbine Engine Co. Phoenix, AZ, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1987Subject CategoryAircraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:179561-VOL-2NASA-CR-179561-VOL-2GARRETT-21-5278-2-VOL-2Accession Number89N18487Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS3-20073PROJECT: RTOP 505-63-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19890009116.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
**Exhibit32.1**

Certification ofPrincipal Executive OfficerPursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended  March 31, 2007(the “Report”) of ATS Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Edward H. Bersoff,Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Registrant.
| Date: May 15, 2007 |       | By:        |   | /s/ Edward H.  Bersoff                    |
|--------------------|------------|------------|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|               | ** ** | ** ** |   | **Edward  H. Bersoff**                    |
|               | ** ** | ** ** |   | **Chairman  and Chief Executive Officer** |
|               | ** ** | ** ** |   | **(Principal  Executive Officer)**        |

 

 

----
#### O’Connor et al., Appellees, *v.*Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Appellant.

[Cite as *O’Connor v. Cleveland Clinic Found.,*109 Ohio St.3d 1227, 2006-Ohio-2993.]

(No. 2005-1228

Submitted May 10, 2006

Decided June 28, 2006.)

{¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.

*1228Paul W. Flowers Co., L.P.A., and Paul W. Flowers; and Becker & Mishkind Co., L.P.A., and Michael F. Becker, for appellees.

Tucker Ellis & West, L.L.P., and Irene C. Keyse-Walker; and Roetzel *&*Andress, Anna Moore Carulas, Ingrid Kinkopf-Zajac, and Douglas G. Leak, for appellant.
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1427.1 Applicability. ( a ) The regulations in this subpart are applicable to crops of upland cotton and extra long staple cotton. This part specifies the general provisions under which the Marketing Assistance Loans (MAL) and Loan Deficiency Payment (LDP) Programs will be administered by the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC). Eligibility to receive MALs and LDPs is subject to additional terms and conditions that are in the MAL note and security agreement and the LDP application. The provisions in this part apply to the 2014 and subsequent crops.
( b ) The basic loan rate, the schedule of premiums and discounts, and forms applicable to the cotton MAL and LDP Programs are available from FSA offices. The forms for use in connection with the programs in this subpart will be prescribed by CCC.
( c ) MALs and LDPs will not be available for any cotton produced on land owned or otherwise in the possession of the United States if such land is occupied without the consent of the United States.
( d ) Average adjusted income (AGI) and payment limitation provisions specified in part 1400 of this chapter are applicable to MALs and LDPs.
[67 FR 64459, Oct. 18, 2002, as amended at 73 FR 65719, Nov. 5, 2008; 80 FR 132, Jan. 2, 2015; 86 FR 70706, Dec. 13, 2021]
#### § 29.1084 Whitish-lemon (LL).

A whitish-yellow color which usually results during wet growing seasons when rain leaches or washes out the yellow color from the leaf. Any leaf of which 20 percent or more of its leaf surface has whitish-yellow color may be described as whitish-lemon.

[48 FR 29671, June 28, 1983. Redesignated at 49 FR 16756, Apr. 20, 1984 and 51 FR 25027, July 10, 1986]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:97cr80/RV

STEPHEN EMMANUEL LANGLEY

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Senior Judge Roger Vinson on February 13, 2006 

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION to correct sentence Pursuant to Rule 60(b)(1)(6) 

Filed by Defendant on 12/29/2005 Doc.# 193

RESPONSES:

 United States on 2/10/2006 Doc.# 199 

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

 Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

 s/Jerry Marbut

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Jerry Marbut

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 14th day of

 February , 2006, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) 

/s/ Roger Vinson

ROGER VINSON

Senior United States District Judge

Case 3:97-cr-00080-RV Document 200 Filed 02/14/06 Page 1 of 1
#### § 29.61 When application deemed filed.

An application shall be deemed filed when delivered to the Division, the office of inspection, or according to the nature of the service requested, to an official inspector, sampler, or weigher. When an application is filed, the date and time of filing shall be recorded by the official receiving it.
AAM-12-235-E March 15, 2012

Exemption No. 10094A Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2010-0462

Jonathan B. Hill, Esq. Counsel for Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. Dow Lohnes, PLLC 1200 New Hampshire Avenue, NW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20036

Dear Mr. Hill:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 10094. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions

and limitations.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated February 21, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Adm inistration (FAA) on behalf of Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. (Hawaiia n), for an extension of Exemption No. 10094. That exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows Hawaiian, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Hawaiian.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determ ined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10094 remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the following conditions and limitations.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Em ployees of Hawaiian are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 121 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the Hawaiian part 121 operation, not under part 91.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the term ination date of Exemption No. 10094 to July 31, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/
James R. Fraser, M.D. Deputy Federal Air Surgeon
September 4, 2015

Mr. Junior Welsch

Crop Production Operations Director

Greatbend Coop Association

323 So 281 Hwy

Great Bend, KS 67530

Dear Mr. Welsch :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

§ Part 21, 61.133(a)(b), 91.7(b), 91.119, 91.151(a), Subpart E (91.401

- 91.417) of Title 14,

Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot proc ess your request and

what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We received your May 18, 2015 exemption request on behalf of Greatbend Coop Association

filed in D ocket No

. FAA− 20 15

− 2514 , but we are unable to process your request any further.

Your petition does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to

consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemptio n.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure3
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2289 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2289

 To rename section 219(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as the 
                   Kay Bailey Hutchison Spousal IRA.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 6, 2013

    Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas (for himself, Mr. Brady of Texas, Mr. 
 Marchant, Ms. Granger, Mr. Olson, Mr. Culberson, Mr. McCaul, and Mr. 
   Flores) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To rename section 219(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as the 
                   Kay Bailey Hutchison Spousal IRA.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON SPOUSAL IRA.

    The heading of subsection (c) of section 219 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``Special Rules for Certain 
Married Individuals'' and inserting ``Kay Bailey Hutchison Spousal 
IRA''.
                                 <all>
```
Placeholder for Copyrighted Documents

Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0837

March 2, 2010

The following two copyrighted documents are available at the Docket Center:

“Manual of Petroleum Measurement Standards Chapter 4 – Proving Systems, Section 3 – Small 

Volume Provers”, First Edition, July 1988, Reaffirmed, October 1993, by the American 

Petroleum Institute; and 

“Standard Practice for Competence of Air Emission Testing Bodies”, ASTM D 7036-04.

Accessing dockets:

Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or 

in hard copy at the Air and Radiation Docket, EPA West Building, Room 3334, 1301 

Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20460. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 

a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for 

the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the Air and Radiation 

Docket is (202) 566-1742.
Date: October 22, 2014

From: David Cole, EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards

To: Docket # EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0734

Subject: Meeting with Hearth and Home Technologies - Proposed Standards of 

Performance for New Residential Wood Heaters, New Residential Hydronic 

Heaters and Forced Air Furnaces, and New Residential Masonry Heaters

On October 22, 2014, Hearth and Home Technologies (HHT), at their request, met with 

representatives of EPA. The purpose of the meeting was for HHT to discuss opportunities for 

improving the process of delivering test reports to EPA’s Office of Enforcement and Compliance 

Assurance (OECA) with the outcome of minimizing delays in certification of wood heaters.

Attending the meeting were—

Hearth and Home

Technologies: V.P. Berger, Vice-President, Operations

EPA/OECA: Ed Messina, Julius Banks, Rafael Sanchez, Rick Duffy

EPA/OAQPS

(by telephone): Gil Wood, Mike Toney, Amanda Aldridge, David Cole
Exhibit
      99.7





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS**




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
      Statements:





·
            Registration
                Statement No. 333-126045 on Form
                S-8;




·
            Registration
                Statement No. 333-100973 on Form
                S-8





and
      to
      the use of our reports dated February 9, 2006, relating
      to changes in accounting principles that have been implemented in the financial
      statements), relating
      to the consolidated financial statements of Petro-Canada appearing in Annual
      Report on Form 40-F of Petro-Canada for the year ended December 31,
      2005.





(signed)
      “Deloitte & Touche LLP”





Independent
      Registered Chartered Accountants


Calgary,
      Alberta, Canada


February
      9, 2006
EX-23
          CONSENT OF CHILD, VAN WAGONER & BRADSHAW, PLLC

        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


Board of Directors
City Capital Corporation

We consent to the incorporation by reference of the Company's
independent registered public accounting firm reports dated March 26,
2009 and April 18, 2008 on the consolidated balance sheets as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, changes in stockholders' (deficit) and cash flows for the
years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, included in City Capital
Corporation's Form 10-K, into the Company's previously filed
registration statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-141650).

/s/ Spector, Wong & Dividian, LLP
Spector, Wong & Dividian, LLP
May 14, 2009
Pasadena, California