alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-30644 Summary Calendar

LAWRENCE OZEL LITTLE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus CHARLES R. ROWE; JERRY A. WHITTINGTON; RUTH COX; VICTOR SIZEMORE, Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 99-CV-238 May 11, 2000 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Lawrence Ozel Little, federal prisoner # 53017-0800, argues that the district court abused its discretion in dismissing his complaint as frivolous based on its being prescribed under Louisiana law. Little’s complaint did not raise a federal question and, thus, the district court’s jurisdiction was based on diversity because the parties are domiciled in different states and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. See 28 U.S.C.2

§ 1332(a)(1). Therefore, the Louisiana law of prescription was properly applied in the case. Under Louisiana law, Little was required to file an action for legal malpractice or fraud within one year of the alleged act of malpractice or within one year of the date that the alleged act of malpractice or fraud is discovered or should have been discovered. La. Rev. Stat. Ann. 9:5605 (West 1999); Broussard v.
Toce , 746 So. 2d 659, 662 (La. Ct. App. 1999). Little was in possession of facts more than one year prior to the date that he filed his complaint which made him aware or should have made him aware of the fact that the defendants had engaged in legal malpractice and/or fraud. The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the complaint as frivolous based on the time-bar. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); See Gonzales v. Wyatt , 157 F.3d 1016, 1019 (5th Cir. 1998). Little has not argued on appeal that the district court erred in denying his motion to amend his complaint to raise constitutional claims. Therefore, this claim is deemed abandoned. See Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Little has failed to raise a nonfrivolous issue on appeal. Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. APPEAL DISMISSED.
Exhibit
32.2



Certification
of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Nathan Haas, the Chief Financial
Officer of Vitro Biopharma, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, that, to my knowledge:



1.
The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2022 (the “Report”) of the Company fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



Date:
January 30, 2023



| | By:    | /s/
    Nathan Haas                                                                               
| | ------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Name:  | Nathan Haas                                                                                       
| | Title: | Chief
    Financial Officer
    (Principal
    Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
98-1481.

#### Key v. Mohr.

In Habeas Corpus. *Sua sponte,*cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Section 906Certification**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), the undersigned officer of GuarantyBancorp (the “Company”) hereby certifies that the Company’s QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: April 30,  2009 |     |                |
|-----------------------------|----------|---------------------|
|                        |     |                |
|                        |     |                |
|                        |     | /s/ Daniel M. Quinn |
|                        |     | Name:               | Daniel  M. Quinn |
|                        | * * | Title:              | *Chief  Executive Officer* |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnishedsolely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C. Section 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as aseparate disclosure document.

 

1

----
*Monday, October 26, 1998*

MOTION DOCKET

96- 2311.

#### State v. Keenan.

Cuyahoga App. No. 67452. This court received notification from the Supreme Court of the United States that said court on October 5, 1998, entered an order in No. 97-9591, *Thomas Keenan v. Ohio,*which stated:

> “The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.”

Upon consideration that the stay of execution of sentence granted by this court on May 1,1998, was conditioned upon final disposition of appellant’s petition to the Supreme Court of the United States, and it appearing to this court that the Supreme Court of the United States has rendered a final disposition of the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the stay of execution is hereby terminated as of the date of this entry, October 23,1998.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED by this court that the sentence be carried into execution by the Warden of the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility or, in his absence, by the Deputy Warden on Thursday, the 21st day of January, 1999, in accordance with the statutes so provided.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certified copy of this entry and a warrant under the seal of this court be duly certified to the Warden of the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility and that the Warden shall make due return thereof to the Clerk of the Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that, upon written application of appellant, and pursuant to *State v. Glenn*(1987), 33 Ohio St.3d 601, 514 N.E.2d 869, this court will grant one additional stay for a period ending six months from the date of this entry to allow appellant an opportunity to file a petition for post-conviction relief.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2176 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2176

To require express prior statutory authorization from Congress to carry 
   out any activities under the United States-Afghanistan Strategic 
             Partnership Agreement, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2013

  Mr. Jones introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require express prior statutory authorization from Congress to carry 
   out any activities under the United States-Afghanistan Strategic 
             Partnership Agreement, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXPRESS PRIOR STATUTORY AUTHORIZATION TO CARRY OUT 
              ACTIVITIES UNDER THE UNITED STATES-AFGHANISTAN STRATEGIC 
              PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT.

    The United States Government may not carry out any activities under 
the United States-Afghanistan Strategic Partnership Agreement, signed 
on May 2, 2012, and went into effect on July 4, 2012, or any successor 
agreement, for any fiscal year that begins on or after the date of the 
enactment of this Act absent express prior statutory authorization from 
Congress to carry out such activities for such fiscal year.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of China Natural Resources, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I,Yue Ming Wai Bonaventure, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Yue Ming Wai Bonaventure

Yue Ming Wai Bonaventure

Chief Financial Officer

June 19, 2017

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2








SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION





CERTIFICATION OF W. RANDALL FOWLER, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


OF EPE HOLDINGS, LLC, THE GENERAL PARTNER OF


ENTERPRISE GP HOLDINGS L.P.





In connection with this quarterly report of Enterprise GP Holdings L.P. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, W. Randall Fowler, Chief Financial Officer of EPE Holdings, LLC, the general partner
of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.











/s/ W. Randall FowlerName:
W. Randall FowlerTitle:
Chief Financial Officer of EPE Holdings, LLCon behalf of Enterprise GP Holdings L.P.





Date:     August 10, 2009
Exhibit 10.8(a)

FIRST AMENDMENT
TO THE SKYWEST, INC.
2006 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

This First Amendment to the SkyWest, Inc. 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the
"Plan") is adopted effective as of January 1, 2009 by SkyWest, Inc., a Utah corporation (the
"Company") as sponsor of the Plan.

WHEREAS,
the Company maintains the Plan for the benefit of its eligible employees and the eligible employees of its designated subsidiaries; and

WHEREAS,
the Company desires to amend the Plan to change the definition of "Purchase Price."

NOW,
THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

1.     The
text of Section 2(v) of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and is replaced with the following:



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this First Amendment to be executed this    day of January, 2009.

SKYWEST, INC.By:

/s/ BRADFORD R. RICHName:

Bradford R. RichIts:

Chief Financial Officer


---
#### In the Matter of Board of Education of the Bellmore-Merrick Central High School District, Appellant, v Association of Building Administrators and Supervisors of Bellmore-Merrick Central High School District, Respondent.

— In a proceeding to stay arbitration, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered March 29, 1978, which denied the petition and directed the parties to proceed to arbitration. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements, on the opinion of Mr. Justice Gibbons at Special Term. Hopkins, J. P., Titone, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 31.2****Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**I, Bradley Bertouille, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Standard Aero Holdings, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by the report based on such evaluation;and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Dated:May 15, 2007   /s/ Bradley Bertouille   Bradley Bertouille  Chief Financial Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 1948

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1948 appear at 80 FR 9888, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1948.66 [Reserved]
Exhibit
10.24


 


2005
Annual Incentive Plan Summary


 


On December 30, 2004, the Board of
Directors approved the Company’s 2005 Annual Incentive Plan (AIP).  The AIP is established each year to provide a
bonus to participants based on the Company’s achievement of annual corporate
performance goals.  Participants in the
plan are recommended by management and approved by the Board of Directors and
generally include the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief
Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and other executive officers with
management authority over the corporate functions responsible for the
achievement of the goals.  The bonus
earned by each participant will be equal to a fixed percentage of the participant’s
salary multiplied by the percentage of achievement of the annual corporate
performance goals, as determined by the Board of Directors.  The goals are based upon the following four
metrics:  (i) revenue growth as compared
to industry growth, weighted 30%; (ii) profitability improvement over 2004;
weighted 20%; (iii) orders derived from the front end of the microelectronic
manufacturing process, weighted 35%; and (iv) free cash flow, weighted
15%.  The bonus earned is paid upon
public release of the Company’s annual results.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM JONES
MEDICAL INDUSTRIES, INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND INCOME STATEMENT FOR THE
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                       5,410,601
<SECURITIES>                                   120,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,261,170
<ALLOWANCES>                                   128,712
<INVENTORY>                                 10,746,630
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            25,012,149
<PP&E>                                      18,507,472
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,064,855
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              74,696,643
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,563,477
<BONDS>                                      9,124,986
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               10
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       567,126
<OTHER-SE>                                  49,322,998
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                74,696,643
<SALES>                                     56,397,095
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            56,397,095
<CGS>                                       27,165,896
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               27,165,896
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               121,229
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                63,918
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             452,097
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             14,925,304
<INCOME-TAX>                                 5,597,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          9,328,304
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 9,328,304
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .64
        

</TABLE>
98- 1535.

#### State v. Scott.

Franklin App. No. 97APA07-906. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines .that a conflict exists; *sua sponte,*cause held for the decision in 97-1985, *State v. Cook,*Allen App. No. 1-97- 21; briefing schedule stayed.
### DepartmentofFish and Wildlife 

# regan FishDivision 3406 CherryAvenue NE Theodore R. Kulongoski, Governor Salem, OR 97303 (503) 947-6200 Fax (503) 947-6202 May 18,2009 TTY (503) 947-6339 www.dfw.state.or.us
OREGON Mr. Kenneth Carver Washington County Health 

### &Human Services Environmental Health Division Fish &Wildlife 155 N. FirstAve. Hillsboro, OR 97124-3072 Mr. Toby Harris Washington County Health 

### &Human Services 155 N. First Ave Hillsboro, OR 97124-3072 RE: 2009 Washington CountyPesticide Use Plan DearMr. Carver and Mr. Harris: The Oregon Department ofFish and Wildlife has completed review ofthe Washington County (County) 2009 Pesticide Use Plan (plan) in accordance with ORS 452.140. Based on the informationyou supplied, yourplan is approved with the following requirements:

.• Label restrictions mustbe strictly adhered to and apply to sensitive areas including wetlands, ditches and irrigation canals connected to lakes and streams.
• Ifan adulticide is used near sensitive areas as a result ofdisease detection or outbreak, we are confidentthat all care will be taken to protect sensitive fish and wildlife areas and resources. Ifaerial adulticiding is needed, the 2009 plan indicates ODFW and DHS will be contacted priorto implementation. Adulticides should be prevented from drifting into sensitive areas.
• A 1OO-foot buffer along sensitive waterways should be maintained during adulticiding operations.

• The County distributes Gambusia affinis (western mosquitofish) and has received an ODFW Fish Transportation Permit. Please provide ODFW's Gambusia Backgrounder (attached) to the public receiving Gambusia. This is also located at: http://www.dfw.state.or.us/fish/diseaseslbackgrounder WNV gambusi a.pdf

• Priorto developing yourplan next year, please contactMischa Connine, ODFWDistrict Habitat Biologist (503-621-3488, ext. 228) to coordinate on any new sensitive areas and possible issues related to them.

51000-801000-06

### The 2009 plan shows considerablethought and concern about managing disease and mosquito vectors, as well as maintaining healthy fish and wildlife populations. Your 2008 Annual 

### Report is thorough andprovides excellent explanations and insight into the guiding principles, goals, objectives and actions ofthe county. Ifyou have any questions, please call Jill Zamowitz at 503-947-6092, orMischa Connine, at the number above. Thank you for your efforts protecting fish and wildlife resources while protecting human health through vector control efforts. Sincerely, /


### WaterPolicy Coordinator Fish Division Attachment (GambusiaBackgrounder) Cc: (Bye-copy) Emilio DeBess, DHS, Portland DonVandeBerghIMischaConnine, NorthWillamette Watershed District, Sauvie Island Tom Murtagh, North Willamette Watershed District, Clackamas JeffBoechler, NorthWillamette Watershed Manager, Clackamas Rick Kepler, Fish Division
#### § 29.1119 Rule 13.

Degrees of uniformity shall be expressed in terms of percentages. The percentages shall govern the portion of a lot which must meet the specifications of the grade. (These percentages shall not affect limitations established by other rules.) The minor portion must be closely related, but may be of a different group, quality, and color from the major portion.