alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
        This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of News Communications, Inc. as of November 30, 1998 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      NOV-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                         DEC-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                           NOV-30-1998
<CASH>                                                     123,621
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            4,946,438
<ALLOWANCES>                                             1,690,502
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         3,682,906
<PP&E>                                                   1,048,180
<DEPRECIATION>                                             683,208
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           7,436,224
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    5,688,219
<BONDS>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                    27,919
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                220,340
<OTHER-SE>                                                (460,328)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             7,436,224
<SALES>                                                 17,822,070
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                        17,822,070
<CGS>                                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           19,815,599
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        (322,970)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         (2,316,499)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     (2,711,735)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                            (2,711,735)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                (1.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                (1.01)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 224 (Monday, November 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71141-71142]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29328]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLMTB07900 09 L10100000.PH0000 LXAMANMS0000]


Notice of Public Meeting; Western Montana Resource Advisory 
Council

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Public Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972, the U.S. Department of 
the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Western Montana Resource 
Advisory Council (RAC) will meet as indicated below.

DATES: The meeting will be held December 9, 2010, beginning at 9 a.m. 
with a 30-minute public comment period and will adjourn at 3 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be in the Bureau of Land Management Butte 
Field Office (106 North Parkmont) in Butte, Montana.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 15-member council advises the Secretary 
of the Interior on a variety of management issues associated with 
public land management in Montana. During these meetings the council 
will participate in/discuss/act upon several topics, including: new RAC 
member orientation; information on the Landscape Conservation 
Cooperative program; Field Office updates; discussion of oil and gas 
leasing reform; and administrative details.

[[Page 71142]]

    All RAC meetings are open to the public. The public may present 
written comments to the RAC. Each formal RAC meeting will also have 
time allocated for hearing public comments. Depending on the number of 
persons wishing to comment and time available, the time for individual 
oral comments may be limited.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Abrams, Western Montana Resource 
Advisory Council Coordinator, Butte Field Office, 106 North Parkmont, 
Butte, Montana 59701, telephone 406-533-7617.

Richard M. Hotaling,
District Manager, Western Montana District.
[FR Doc. 2010-29328 Filed 11-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-DN-P
#### § 29.1009 Condition.

The state of tobacco which results from the method of preparation or from the degree of fermentation. Words used to describe the condition of tobacco are: Undried, air-dried, steam-dried, sweating, sweated, and aged.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:98cr47-02/LAC

THOMAS JEFFERSON BRELAND III

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on March 3, 2010 

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND CLARIFICATION RE:

ORDER (DOCUMENT #200) DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR REDUCTION OF

SENTENCE PURSUANT TO TITLE 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (DOCUMENT #199) 

Filed by DEFENDANT PRO SE on 1/25/2010 Doc.# 206

RESPONSES:

 NONE on Doc.#

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Jerry Marbut

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Jerry Marbut

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 23 day of

rd

March, 2010, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED. MOOT.

(b) See Doc. 204.

s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:97CR128-02/RV

ERIC DARNEL TAYLOR

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Senior Judge Roger Vinson on June 17, 2009

Motion/Pleadings: Motion to Reconsider 3582(c)(2) Motion and Motion to Request a 

Sentencing Hearing 

Filed by Defendant on 06/03/2009 Doc.# 252

RESPONSES:

 on Doc.# 

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

 s/J. Marbut

Deputy Clerk

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 17th day of 

 June , 2009, that:

(a) The motion to reconsider is granted. See separate order.

(b) The motion to request a sentencing hearing is DENIED.

 /s/ Roger Vinson

ROGER VINSON

Senior United States District Judge

Case 3:97-cr-00128-RV Document 257 Filed 06/17/09 Page 1 of 1
2006-0866.

#### State v. Parks.

Montgomery App. No. 20905, 2005-Ohio-6395. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.
Editorial Note on Subchapter C of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter C appear by Amdt. 381, 65 FR 64586, Oct. 30, 2000.

Editorial Note on Part 272
Editorial Note: OMB control numbers relating to this part 272 are contained in § 271.8.

§ 272.13 Prisoner verification system (PVS). ( a ) *General.* Each State agency shall establish a system to monitor and prevent individuals who are being held in any Federal, State, and/or local detention or correctional institutions for more than 30 days from being included in a SNAP household.
( b ) *Use of match data.* State prisoner verification systems shall provide for: ( 1 ) The comparison of identifying information about each household member, excluding minors, as that term is defined by each State, and one-person households in States where a face-to-face interview is conducted, against identifying information about inmates of institutions at Federal, State and local levels;
( 2 ) The reporting of instances where there is a match;
( 3 ) The independent verification of match hits to determine their accuracy;
( 4 ) Notice to the household of match results. The State must use the procedures laid forth in § 273.12(c)(3)(iii) of this chapter;
( 5 ) An opportunity for the household to respond to the match prior to an adverse action to deny, reduce, or terminate benefits; and
( 6 ) The establishment and collections of claims as appropriate.
( c ) *Match frequency.* State agencies shall make a comparison of match data for adult household members at the time of application and at recertification. States that opt to obtain and use prisoner information collected under Section 1611(e)(1)(I)(i)(I) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1382(e)(1)(I)(i)(I)) shall be considered in compliance with this section. States shall enter into a computer matching agreement with the SSA under authority contained in 42 U.S.C. 405(r)(3).
[77 FR 48055, Aug. 13, 2012, as amended at 82 FR 2035, Jan. 6, 2017]
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:98CR49/RV

EARNEST HICKS

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Vinson on 04/06/2009 

Type of Motion/Pleading MOTION TO REDUCE SENTENCE PUSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 

3582(c)(2)

Filed by: Defendant on 4/02-03/09

03/31/2008

 Doc. No. 147,153,154

( ) Stipulated/Consented/Joint Pleading

RESPONSES:

Government on 4/16/08 Doc. No. 151

on Doc. No.

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

/s/ J. Marbut

Deputy Clerk

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 8th day of

 April , 2009, that:

(a) The requested relief is DENIED.

(b) The Defendant is not eligible for a sentence reduction under 

Amendments 706, 711, and 715. 

(c) The amendments do not affect the Defendant’s sentencing guideline

range. 

/s/ Roger Vinson

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 3:98-cr-00049-RV-EMT Document 155 Filed 04/08/09 Page 1 of 1
§ 3.41 Procedures for notification of intent to collect by administrative offset. ( a ) Prior to initiation of collection by administrative offset, a creditor agency must: ( 1 ) Send the debtor a written Notice of Intent to Collect by Administrative Offset, by mail or hand-delivery, of the type and amount of the debt, the intention of the agency to use non-centralized administrative offset (which includes a USDA administrative offset) to collect the debt 30 days after the date of the Notice, the name of the Federal agency or USDA agency from which the creditor agency wishes to collect in the case of a non-centralized administrative offset, the intent to refer the debt to Treasury for collection through centralized administrative offset (including possible offset of tax refunds) 60 days after the date of the Notice if the debt is not satisfied by offset within USDA or by agreement with another Federal agency, and an explanation of the debtor's rights under 31 U.S.C. 3716; and
( 2 ) Give the debtor the opportunity: ( i ) To inspect and copy agency records related to the debt;
( ii ) For a review within the agency of the determination of indebtedness in accordance with subpart F of this part; and
( iii ) To make a written agreement to repay the debt.
( b ) The procedures specified in paragraph (a) of this section are not required when: ( 1 ) The offset is in the nature of a recoupment;
( 2 ) The debt arises under a contract subject to the Contracts Disputes Act;
( 3 ) In the case of a non-centralized administrative offset, the agency first learns of the existence of the amount owed by the debtor when there is insufficient time before payment would be made to the debtor/payee to allow for prior notice and an opportunity for review. When prior notice and an opportunity for review are omitted, the agency will give the debtor such notice and an opportunity for review as soon as practicable and will promptly refund any money ultimately found not to have been owed to the government; or
( 4 ) The agency previously has given a debtor any of the notice and review opportunities required under this part, with respect to a particular debt (see, for example, § 3.11). With respect to loans paid on an installment basis, notice and opportunity to review under this part may only be provided once for the life of the loan upon the occurrence of the first delinquent installment. Subsequently, if an agency elects this option, credit reporting agencies may be furnished periodically with updates as to the current or delinquent status of the loan account and the borrower may receive notice of referral to TOP for delinquent installments without further opportunity for review. Any interest accrued or any installments coming due after the offset is initiated also would not require a new notice and opportunity to review.
( c ) The Notice of Intent to Collect by Administrative Offset will be included as part of a demand letter issued under § 3.11 to advise the debtor of all debt collection possibilities that the agency may employ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       5,718,000
<SECURITIES>                                    14,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,966,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  8,415,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            25,708,000
<PP&E>                                      21,906,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,698,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              70,125,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       39,263,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       102,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  23,046,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                70,125,000
<SALES>                                     65,196,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            65,196,000
<CGS>                                       58,324,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               58,324,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,456,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,449,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,852,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (842,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,010,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 847,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,163,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.13)
        

</TABLE>
ICRAS 1957 1845
- XXXX v 1

– A ffected Public

– For - Profit Institutions 3 /4 /2013

This is a request for a new collection to obtain consumer information from foreign graduate medical institutions that participate in the William D. Ford Federal Direct Loan Program (Direct Loan Program) as authorized under Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1963, as amended, (HEA). The request is to gain approval of a form for reporting specific graduation information to the Department of Education (Department) with a certification signed b y the institution’s President/CEO/Chancellor. The Department estimates an average of 16 hours is required to comp lete the reporting requirements. 3 institutions X 16 hours = 48 hours **Repeat as needed for all sections** TOTAL S Response 1 Respondents 3 Burden Hours 48
Order entered February 18, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No s . 05 - 14 - 00418 - CR & 05 - 14 - 00419 - CR DIANA FLORES PEINADO , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 5

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F - 1025782 - L



### O RDER The Court has before it appellee the State of Texas’s February 17, 2015 “First Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief.” We GRANT the motion and ORDER that appellee’s brief be filed on or before M arch 19, 2015

. /s/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE PRESIDING JUSTICE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

WANDA ADAMS OWENS,

Case No. 1:20-cv-62-AW-MAF

Plaintiff, 

v.

ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of 

the Social Security Administration, 

Defendant. 

_______________________________/ 

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

AND AFFIRMING COMMISSIONER’S DECISION

I have carefully considered the magistrate judge’s January 6, 2021 Report and 

Recommendation, ECF No. 22, to which no objections have been filed. I now 

conclude that the Report and Recommendation should be approved, and it is adopted 

and incorporated by reference into this order. The clerk will enter a judgment that 

states “The decision of the Commissioner is affirmed.” The clerk will then close the 

file.

SO ORDERED on February 15, 2021. 

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-00062-AW-MAF Document 23 Filed 02/15/21 Page 1 of 1
#### Ann Martino et al., Respondents, v Mid-Island Hospital et al., Defendants, and American Cystoscope Company, Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant American Cystoscope Company appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered February 22, 1979, as denied its motion for a protective order as to certain of plaintiffs’ interrogatories. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion for a protective order vacating all interrogatories granted, without prejudice to the service of further interrogatories, if plaintiffs be so advised. The interrogatories submitted are unduly broad and call for such things as medical opinions from the appellant. "The burden of serving a proper demand is upon counsel, and not for the courts to correct a palpably bad one” *(Itzkoff v Allstate Ins. Co.,*59 AD2d 854). Under the circumstances, rather than prune the numerous improper questions, we have vacated the entire demand (see *Sol Mor Novelty Co. v Northwestern Nat. Ins. Co.,*60 AD2d 543; *Woodmere Academy v Steinberg,*51 AD2d 514). This vacatur is without prejudice to plaintiffs’ propounding further interrogatories, if they be so advised (see *Blotcher v Upjohn Co.,*54 AD2d 851). Mollen, P. J., Titone, O’Connor, Cohalan and Margett, JJ., concur.
II 

Calendar No. 439 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2388 

[Report No. 113–197] 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

DECEMBER 9, 2013 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

JUNE 24, 2014 

Reported by Mr. TESTER, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To take certain Federal lands located in El Dorado County, 

California, into trust for the benefit of the Shingle 

Springs Band of Miwok Indians, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LAND INTO TRUST FOR THE SHINGLE SPRINGS 

4 BAND OF MIWOK INDIANS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The land described in subsection 

6 (b) is hereby taken into trust for the benefit of the Shingle 

7 Springs Band of Miwok Indians, subject to valid existing 


TKELLEY on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2388 RS 

1 rights and management agreements related to easements 

2 and rights-of-way. 

3 (b) LAND DESCRIPTION.—The land taken into trust 

4 pursuant to subsection (a) is the approximately 40.852 

5 acres of Federal land under the administrative jurisdiction 

6 of the Bureau of Land Management identified as ‘‘Con7 veyance boundary’’ on the map titled ‘‘Shingle Springs 

8 Land Conveyance/Draft’’ and dated June 7, 2012, includ9 ing improvements and appurtenances thereto. 

10 (c) GAMING.—Class II and class III gaming under 

11 the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et 

12 seq.) shall not be permitted at any time on the land taken 

13 into trust pursuant to subsection (a). 

Passed the House of Representatives December 3, 

2013. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


TKELLEY on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS

TKELLEY on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 439 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2388 

[Report No. 113–197] 

AN ACT 

To take certain Federal lands located in El Dorado 

for other purposes. the Shingle Springs Band of Miwok Indians, and County, California, into trust for the benefit of 

JUNE 24, 2014 

Reported without amendment 


TKELLEY on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1430.221 Estates, trusts, and minors. ( a ) Program documents executed by producers legally authorized to represent estates or trusts will be accepted only if such producers furnish evidence of the authority to execute such documents.
( b ) A minor who is otherwise eligible for assistance under this part must also: ( 1 ) Establish that the right of majority has been conferred on the minor by court proceedings or by statute;
( 2 ) Show that a guardian has been appointed to manage the minor's property and the applicable program documents are executed by the guardian; or
( 3 ) Furnish a bond under which the surety guarantees any loss incurred for which the minor would be liable had the minor been an adult.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       5

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    Dec-31-1997
<CASH>                          1,559,000
<SECURITIES>                    000
<RECEIVABLES>                   11,000
<ALLOWANCES>                    000
<INVENTORY>                     000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                2,141,000
<PP&E>                          000
<DEPRECIATION>                  000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  2,227,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           1,161,000
<BONDS>                         000
<COMMON>                        000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           000
<PREFERRED>                     000
<OTHER-SE>                      495,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,656,000
<SALES>                         000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                1,319,000
<CGS>                           000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   20,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                302,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 997,000
<INCOME-TAX>                    000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             997,000
<DISCONTINUED>                  000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 000
<CHANGES>                       000
<NET-INCOME>                    997,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   15.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                   15.47


</TABLE>