alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION

I, **Gary A. Reys**, certify that:

(1)          I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 of CellCyte Genetics Corporation (the "Report");

(2)          Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;

(3)          Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;

(4)          The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)          Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)          Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)          Disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

(5)          The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the  small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)          All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)          Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:     November 13, 2007.

/s/ "*Gary A. Reys*"
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FOR SEC FORM 10K AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-27-1998             JUN-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-29-1997             JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1998             JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                           1,615                   2,674
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,456                   9,045
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,037                     197
<INVENTORY>                                      8,419                   6,776
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,961                  20,104
<PP&E>                                           7,879                   7,831
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,759                   4,308
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,604                  24,837
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,322                  13,072
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            55                      54
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,340                  10,192
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,604                  24,837
<SALES>                                         37,025                  35,505
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,025                  35,505
<CGS>                                           20,707                  18,650
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,707                  18,650
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,279                  16,168
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 235                     107
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,277)                     638
<INCOME-TAX>                                       175                     400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,452)                     238
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,452)                     238
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.812)                    .042
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.812)                    .042
        

</TABLE>
#### § 28.415 Low Middling Light Spotted Color.

Low Middling Light Spotted Color is color which in spot or color, or both, is between Low Middling Color and Low Middling Spotted Color.
(115 App. Div. 174)

#### McKEAND v. LOCKE.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

October 19, 1906.

Discovery—Examination of Adversary Before Trial.

In the absence of bad faith or abuse of process, a party to an action is entitled to examine his adversary before trial as to facts which are material to the issue and of which he has knowledge, and take his deposition for use on the trial, even though such party might procure the evidence from other persons or could subpoena his opponent for the trial.

[Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see vol. 16, Cent. Dig. Discovery, §§' 49-54.]

Appeal from Special Term, New York County.

Action by William B. McKeand against Charles B. Locke. From an order vacating an order for examination of plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed, and order for examination reinstated.

*705Argued before O’BRIEN, P. J., and INGRAHAM, CLARKE, HOUGHTON, and SCOTT, JJ.

Louis F. Doyle, for appellant.

Edgar J. Nathan, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This order must be reversed and the order for the examination of the plaintiff reinstated on the authority of Goldmark v. U. S. Electric-Galvanizing Company, 111 App. Div. 526, 97 N. Y. Supp. 1078, recently decided by this court. That decision sweeps away many technical rules which were fast growing up in the practice of examining one’s adversary before trial, and establishes the rule for this department, that, in the absence of bad faith or abuse of process, a party to an action is entitled to examine his adversary before trial as to facts which are material to the issues and of which he has knowledge, and take his deposition for use on the trial, and that it is no answer to such application that the party making it can procure the evidence from other persons or could subpoena his opponent for the trial.

This decision was not called to the attention of the learned judge who presided at the Special Term, as it was not then published. An observance of it, however, in the future by attorneys, will save many needless motions and appeals.

The order is reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements,- and the order for examination of plaintiff reinstated.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

CHRISTINE K. BRYANT, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-4159 ) 2D17-328 S&J SPORTS, INC. d/b/a PLAY IT AGAIN ) SPORTS, a Florida Corporation, FORTIN ) CONSOLIDATED HOLDINGS, INC., a Florida Corporation, ) and STAMINA PRODUCTS, INC., a ) Foreign Corporation, ) ) Appellees. ) ) Opinion filed July 25, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Larry Helms, Judge. Christine K. Bryant, pro se. Robert Aranda of Valenti, Campbell, Trohn, Tamayo & Aranda, P.A., Lakeland, for Appellees S&J Sports, Inc. d/b/a Play It Again Sports and Fortin Holdings, Inc. No appearance for remaining Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, SALARIO, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1864 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1864

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend title 10, United States Code, to require an Inspector General 
investigation of allegations of retaliatory personnel actions taken in 
 response to making protected communications regarding sexual assault.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INSPECTOR GENERAL INVESTIGATION OF ALLEGATIONS OF 
              RETALIATORY PERSONNEL ACTIONS TAKEN IN RESPONSE TO MAKING 
              PROTECTED COMMUNICATIONS REGARDING SEXUAL ASSAULT.

    Section 1034(c)(2)(A) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 
by striking ``sexual harassment or'' and inserting ``rape, sexual 
assault, or other sexual misconduct in violation of sections 920 
through 920c of this title (articles 120 through 120c of the Uniform 
Code of Military Justice), sexual harassment, or''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 27, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1864

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To amend title 10, United States Code, to require an Inspector General 
investigation of allegations of retaliatory personnel actions taken in 
 response to making protected communications regarding sexual assault.
```
#### § 29.2516 Elements of quality.

Physical characteristics used to determine the quality of tobacco. Words selected to describe degrees within each element are shown in the chart in § 29.2601.
Exhibit 32.2





Certification
of Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant
to


Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2009 (the “Report”) of ATS Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Pamela A.
Little, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.





Date:
      May 11, 2009
              By:
              /s/ Pamela A. LittlePamela
      A. LittleChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)
#### The State ex rel. Kirk, Appellant, *v.*Owens-Illinois, Inc. et al., Appellees.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Kirk v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 435.]

(No. 98-41

Submitted September 15, 1998

Decided October 28, 1998.)

*Michael J. Muldoon,*for appellant.

*Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, L.L.P.,*and *Theodore P. Mattis,*for appellee Owens-Illinois, Inc.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Steven P. Fixler,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2289 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2289

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 26, 2013

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To rename section 219(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as the 
                   Kay Bailey Hutchison Spousal IRA.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON SPOUSAL IRA.

    The heading of subsection (c) of section 219 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``Special Rules for Certain 
Married Individuals'' and inserting ``Kay Bailey Hutchison Spousal 
IRA''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 25, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 224 (Monday, November 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 71134]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29359]



[[Page 71134]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of General Medical Sciences; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of General Medical 
Sciences Special Emphasis Panel; Conference Grants Review.
    Date: December 13, 2010.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, 45 
Center Drive, Room 3AN-12F, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Helen R. Sunshine, PhD, Chief, Office of 
Scientific Review, National Institute of General Medical Sciences, 
National Institutes of Health, Natcher Building, Room 3AN-12F, 
Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-594-2881, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3c4f49524f545552547c52555b514f12525554125b534a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d1a2a4bfa2b9b8bfb991bfb8b6bca2ffbfb8b9ffb6bea7">[email protected]</span></a>.

Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.375, 
Minority Biomedical Research Support; 93.821, Cell Biology and 
Biophysics Research; 93.859, Pharmacology, Physiology, and 
Biological Chemistry Research; 93.862, Genetics and Developmental 
Biology Research; 93.88, Minority Access to Research Careers; 93.96, 
Special Minority Initiatives, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 16, 2010.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-29359 Filed 11-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 29.3052 Red color (R).

A brownish red.

[24 FR 8771, Oct. 29, 1959. Redesignated at 47 FR 51722, Nov. 17, 1982, and at 49 FR 16758, Apr. 20, 1984]
§ 2500.105 Project types and priorities. For each RFP, OAO may develop and include the appropriate project types and focus areas based on the critical needs of the socially disadvantaged farmer and rancher community. For standard OASDFR projects, competitive grants or cooperative agreements will be awarded to support programs and services, as appropriate, to encourage and assist socially disadvantaged farmers and ranchers in the following focus areas: ( a ) Owning and operating farms and ranches;
( b ) Participating equitably in the full range of agricultural programs offered by the Department; and
( c ) Other areas as specified by the Secretary in the RFP.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

RONALD SATISH EMRIT,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:20cv31-MW/GRJ

FEDERAL BUREAU OF

INVESTIGATION,

Defendant.

_________________________/

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and 

Recommendation, ECF No. 7, and has also reviewed de novo Plaintiff’s objections 

to the report and recommendation, ECF No. 13, and Plaintiff’s Notice of Appeal, 

ECF No. 14, which this Court has construed as further objections to the Report. 

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted, over Plaintiff’s

objections, as this Court’s opinion. The proposed Second Amended Complaint does 

not cure the defects and venue is still improper. The Clerk shall enter judgment 

stating, “Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint, ECF No. 6, is DISMISSED as frivolous 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). Plaintiff’s pending motions, ECF Nos. 8, 
2

9, 10, 11, 12, 16, 17, 18, 19, and 20 are DENIED.” The Clerk shall also close the 

file. 

SO ORDERED on March 23, 2020.

s/ MARK E. WALKER

Chief United States District Judge
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 21.1


                                  EXHIBIT 21.1

                SUBSIDIARIES OF NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPLY COMPANY


         The following is a list of subsidiaries of the Company as of December
31, 1995.  Each of the companies is incorporated under the laws of the state
following its name.  The percentage given represents the voting securities of
each company owned by the Company or its subsidiary as of December 31, 1995.

         All of the companies listed below are included in the consolidated
financial statements as of December 31, 1995.


<TABLE>
                 <S>                                        <C>
                 Century Papers, Inc.                       (Texas, 100%)
                 Cardinal Paper Company                     (Oklahoma, 100% by Century Papers, Inc.)
                 National Sanitary Supply
                   Development, Inc.                        (Delaware, 100%)
</TABLE>
#### § 29.6051 Unstemmed.

A form of tobacco, including whole leaf and leaf scrap, from which the stems or midribs have not been removed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

MATHEW SELOVER

Plaintiff, 

vs. CASE NUMBER: 3:20-CV-4698-

TKW-HTC

 

ESCAMBIA COUNTY BOARD

OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS and

RAYME EDLER, 

Defendants.

 /

NOTICE OF SERVICE

Plaintiff, MATTHEW SELOVER, by and through the undersigned counsel, 

and gives notice to the Court and all parties that the Plaintiff served the Plaintiff’s 

Expert Witness Disclosure pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(B) 

upon the Defendants’ on the 22nd day of February, 2021.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 22nd day of February, 2021 a true and 

correct copy of the foregoing Notice was furnished to counsel for the Defendant as 

listed below via CMC/ECF, E-Mail and U.S. Mail.

 

 /s/ Jeremiah J. Talbott 

JEREMIAH J. TALBOTT, ESQ.

Florida Bar No. 0154784

Case 3:20-cv-04698-TKW-HTC Document 45 Filed 02/22/21 Page 1 of 2
900 East Moreno Street

Pensacola, FL 32503

Tel. (850) 437-9600

Fax (850) 437-9606

E-Mail:jj@talbottlawfirm.com; 

civilfilings@talbottlawfirm.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

SERVICE LIST

Stephanie Pidermann, Esquire

Katie Gudaitis, Esquire

Lydecker Diaz

1221 Brickell Avenue, 19th Floor

Miami, FL 33131

sp@lydeckerdiaz.com

kg@lydeckerdiaz.com

ksm@lydeckerdiaz.com

Attorneys for Defendant, Escambia County Board of County Commissioners

Cecily L. Kaffer, Esquire

Pro hac vice

The Kullman Firm

P.O. Box 1287

Mobile, AL 36633

clk@kullmanlaw.com

Attorney for Defendant, Rayme Edler

Case 3:20-cv-04698-TKW-HTC Document 45 Filed 02/22/21 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. Case Nos.: 3:99cr46/RV/EMT

 3:14cv639/RV/EMT

WILLIE JAMES GRIFFIN, JR.,

____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause com es on for cons ideration upon the chief m agistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated December 12, 2014 (doc. 496). Defendant has been furnished a copy of the

Report and Recommendation and has been aforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title

28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely filed

objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed objections thereto

(doc. 499), I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated

by reference in this order.

2. Defendant’s petition for a writ of audita querela is DENIED, as he is not entitled to

challenge his sentence by means of this writ. 

3. Construed as a motion to vacate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (doc. 493), the instant

motion is DENIED and DISMISSED.

4. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 7th day of January, 2015.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:99-cr-00046-RV-EMT Document 500 Filed 01/07/15 Page 1 of 1
98- 1308.

#### Wood Cty. Bar Assn. v. Wulczak.

On June 29, 1998, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline filed its Final Report in this court, recommending that pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), the respondent, Gregory W. Wulczak, be suspended from the practice of law for two years with eighteen months stayed on probation. While this matter was pending before the court, respondent’s counsel filed a Notice of Death and Motion for Dismissal or Other Appropriate Action. On consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the Motion for Dismissal be, and hereby is, granted and that this cause is hereby dismissed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent’s estate be taxed the costs of these proceedings in the amount of $638.95, which costs shall be payable to this court by certified check or money order on or before ninety days from the date of this order. It is further ordered that if these costs are not paid in full on or before ninety days from the date of this order, interest at the rate of ten percent per annum shall accrue on the balance of unpaid Board costs, effective ninety days from the date of this order.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent’s estate bear the costs of publication.