alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Innova Pure Water, Inc. (the Company), on Form 10-KSB of the year ended June 30, 2003, we hereby certify solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



1. The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all
materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: October 8, 2003.



/s/ Rose SmithPrint Name:

Rose SmithTitle:

Chief Executive Officer/s/ John E. Nohren, Jr.Print Name:

John E. Nohren, Jr.Title:

Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 26 (Tuesday, February 9, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 6393]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2855]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION


Farm Credit Administration Board; Sunshine Act; Regular Meeting

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the 
Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(3)), of the regular meeting of the Farm 
Credit Administration Board (Board).

DATE AND TIME: The regular meeting of the Board will be held at the 
offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on 
February 11, 2010, from 9 a.m. until such time as the Board concludes 
its business.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roland E. Smith, Secretary to the Farm 
Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 883-4056.

ADDRESSES: Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, 
Virginia 22102-5090.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This meeting of the Board will be open to 
the public (limited space available). In order to increase the 
accessibility to Board meetings, persons requiring assistance should 
make arrangements in advance. The matters to be considered at the 
meeting are:

Open Session

A. Approval of Minutes

<bullet> January 14, 2010

B. New Business

<bullet> Spring 2010 Abstract of the Unified Agenda of Federal 
Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions and Spring 2010 Regulatory 
Performance Plan

C. Reports

<bullet> Office of Management Services Quarterly Report

    Dated: February 4, 2010.
Roland E. Smith,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-2855 Filed 2-5-10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6705-01-P
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-13-0001413 17-DEC-2013 10:09 AM
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No.'s 333-135239,
333-134379, 333-133470, 333-130848, 333-130846, 33-60173 and 333-70408) pertaining to the Atlantic Southeast
Airlines, Inc. Investment Savings Plan, SkyWest, Inc. 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan, 2004 Restatement of the SkyWest, Inc. Employees' Retirement Plan, SkyWest, Inc. 2006
Employee Stock Purchase Plan, SkyWest, Inc. 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, SkyWest, Inc. 2001 Allshare Incentive Stock Option Plan and SkyWest, Inc. Executive Stock Incentive
Plan, respectively, of SkyWest, Inc. and subsidiaries, of our reports dated February 20, 2009, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of SkyWest, Inc.
and subsidiaries, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of SkyWest, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2008.

/s/
Ernst & Young LLP

Salt
Lake City, Utah
February 20, 2009

---
#### § 29.3031 Group.

A division of a type covering closely related grades based on certain characteristics which are related to stalk position or the general quality of the tobacco. Groups in Burley, Types 31 and 93, are as follows: Flyings (X), Lugs or Cutters (C), Leaf (B), Tips (T), Mixed (M), Nondescript (N), and Scrap (S).

[24 FR 8771, Oct. 29, 1959. Redesignated and amended at 49 FR 16757, Apr. 20, 1984]
49–008 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 109–460 

WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(a) OF RULE XIII WITH RESPECT 

TO THE SAME DAY CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED BY THE RULES COMMITTEE 

MAY 10, 2006.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. PUTNAM, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 810] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 810, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives clause 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring a twothirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is reported from 

the Rules Committee) against certain resolutions reported from the 

Rules Committee. The rule applies the waiver to any special rule 

reported on the legislative day of May 11, 2006, providing for consideration of the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 376) establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government 

for fiscal year 2007 and setting forth appropriate budgetary levels 

for fiscal years 2008 through 2011. 

Æ 


bajohnson on PROD1PC77 with REPORTS
1 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40318 Summary Calendar

MARIA E. VILLARREAL,
Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER

SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. L-95-CV-100

- - - - - - - - - - February 26, 1998 Before DUHÉ, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 1

Maria E. Villarreal argues t hat the district court erred in

granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment and affirming

the decision of the Commissioner denying disability benefits and

supplemental socia l security income. She avers that the

Commissioner’s decision is not supported by substantial evid ence

and relevant legal standards. Villarreal also avers that the caseshould be remanded for the consideratio n of newly discovered

evidence. We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the

p arties and affirm for essentially the reasons adopted by the

d istrict court. V illarreal v. Apfel
, No. L-95-CV-100 (S.D. T ex.

Jan. 30, 1997). We also find that Villarreal has failed to show

good cause for her failure to present the subject evidence during

her administrative hearing. G eyen v. Secretary of Health and Human

Services , 850 F.2d 263, 264 (5th Cir. 1988).

AFFIRMED.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Edward McGrath, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered on October 31,1979, unanimously affirmed. The case is remitted to the Supreme Court, New York County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). No opinion. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Fein, Lupiano, Bloom and Carro, JJ.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Frederick C. Herbst, certify that:

1.    Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Clayton Holdings,Inc.;

2.    Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.    Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

(b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SECtransition instructions contained in SEC Release No. 34-47986];

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

5.    Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
| Date: August 8, 2007 |                      |     |
|---------------------------|---------------------------|----------|
|                      | /s/ Frederick C. Herbst   |     |
|                      | Frederick C. Herbst       |     |
|                      | *Chief Financial Officer* | * * |

 

----
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                               BERNARD CHAUS, INC.
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Bernard Chaus, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

o    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

o    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

September 28, 2006
                                                 /s/ Barton Heminover
                                                 --------------------
                                                 Barton Heminover
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
```
2005 form of Hilb Rogal & Hobbs Company Restricted Stock Agreement



 Exhibit 10.25 
  
 February 22, 2005 
  
 John H. Doe 
 111 Somewhere Street 
 Richmond, VA 22222 
  
 Dear John: 
  
 I am pleased to announce that pursuant to the terms and conditions of the company’s 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (the ‘Plan’), you have been granted
Restricted Stock Award for 10,000 shares (the ‘Option’) of stock as outlined below. 
  
 Subject to the terms and conditions in the Plan, as amended from time to time and Exhibit A, attached hereto and made a part hereof (together with this letter, the “Agreement”), your award is as follows:

  

					
	Grant Date:	    	 February 7, 2005
	    	 
	Restricted Shares Granted:	    	 1,000
	    	 
	Expiration Date:	    	 2/7/2012
	    	 
	Vesting Schedule:	    	 Executive Restricted
	    	 10% Earnings Growth Contingency

			
	 	    	 2,500 on 02/07/2007
	    	 2006 vs. 2005 or 2005 vs. 2004

			
	 	    	 2,500 on 02/07/2008
	    	 2007 vs. 2006 or 2006 vs. 2005

			
	 	    	 2,500 on 02/07/2009
	    	 2008 vs. 2007 or 2007 vs. 2006

			
	 	    	 2,500 on 02/07/2010
	    	 2009 vs. 2008 or 2008 vs. 2007


  
 Please indicate your acceptance by
executing two (2) original copies of this Agreement and returning one (1) copy by U.S. Mail to Gwynn Noble. 
  

	
	 Very truly yours,

	
	 Martin L. Vaughan, III

	 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



  
 By my signature below, I hereby
acknowledge my Consent to Electronic Delivery, receipt of this Option, pursuant to all terms and conditions of the Plan, and electronic receipt of the Plan and Prospectus. I agree to conform to all of the terms and conditions of the Option and the
Plan. 
  

							
	 Signature:
	 	  

	 	Date:	 	  


	 	 	 John H. Doe
	 	 	 	 

  
 Note: If there are any discrepancies
in the name or address shown above, please make the appropriate corrections on this form. 







 RESTRICTED STOCK AWARDS 
 FOR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS 
  

					
	 	 	 AWARD DATE

	 	 SHARES AWARDED


	 Martin L. Vaughan, III
	 	2/7/05	 	10,000
			
	 Robert B. Lockhart
	 	2/7/05	 	6,000
			
	 Timothy J. Korman
	 	2/7/05	 	4,500
			
	 John P. McGrath
	 	2/7/05	 	3,500
			
	 Thomas Stiles
	 	2/7/05	 	3,500
Searched for **https://www.ssa.gov/ssi/spotlights/spot-work-expenses.htm**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.ssa.gov/ssi/spotlights/spot-work-expenses.htm**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNTIED STATES CODE,


as adopted pursuant to


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the annual report of Theragenics Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Francis J. Tarallo, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods referred to in the Report.




Date: February 25, 2011




/s/ Francis J. TaralloFrancis J. TaralloChief Financial Officer
#### Karen Cacheiro et al., Appellants, v Middletown Enlarged City School District, Respondent.

[814 NYS2d 535]

an action, inter alia, to recover damages for fraud, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Slobod, J.), dated May 20, 2005, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320 [1986]). In opposition thereto, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact, and conceded that all of the causes of action properly raised in their complaint are academic. Accordingly, the Supreme Court correctly granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. As for the cause of action the plaintiffs contend is not academic, the defendant made a prima facie showing that it was not included in the notice of claim the plaintiffs served prior to commencing this action. The plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact in response. Since the plaintiffs failed to comply with a condition precedent to interposition of the cause of action based on that purportedly viable claim (see Education Law § 3813; *H. Verby Co. v Carle Place Union Free School Dist,*5 AD3d 730 [2004]), the defendant was entitled to summary judgment dismissing *847that cause of action as well. Miller, J.P., Ritter, Skelos and Lifson, JJ., concur.
#### § 29.3625 Rule 24.

Tobacco shall be designated as No Grade, using the grademark “No-G,” when it is dirty, nested, offtype, semicured, damaged 20 percent or more, extremely wet or watered, or when it needs to be reworked, contains foreign matter, or has an odor foreign to the type.
State of New York

Court of Appeals This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to 

revision before publication in the New York Reports.

No. 94 SSM 23

In the Matter of Roland Green,

 Respondent,

 v.

Darwin LaClair, &c.,

 Appellant.

Submitted by Brian D. Ginsberg, for appellant. 

Submitted by Michael E. Cassidy, for respondent. 

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, without 

costs (see People ex rel. Negron v Superintendent, Woodbourne Corr. Facility, __ NY3d 

__ [decided today]). Judges Rivera, Stein, Garcia, Wilson and Feinman concur. Chief 

Judge DiFiore and Judge Fahey dissent for reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in 

People ex rel. Negron v Superintendent, Woodbourne Corr. Facility (__ NY3d __ [Fahey, 

J. dissenting] [decided today]).

Decided November 23, 2020
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting.

*Name:*                         Stony Brook FY11 Site Visit (1208).                    

*Date and Time:*                         Tuesday, November 30, 2010, 1 p.m.-5:20 p.m. Wednesday, December 1, 2010, 8:30 a.m.-4:15 p.m.                    

*Place:*                         Stony Brook—Long Island Campus.                    

*Type of Meeting:*                         Partially Closed.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Marvin Goldberg, Program Director for Elementary Particle Physics, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-7392.                    

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To provide an evaluation concerning the proposal submitted to the National Science Foundation.                    

## Agenda

### Tuesday, Nov. 30

1 p.m. Executive session (Closed)

1:15 p.m. Group Overview (JH)

1:30 p.m. Atlas Overview (JH)

2 p.m. D0 Overview (PG)

2:30 p.m. Outreach (RM)

3:10 p.m. Break

3:20 p.m. Tour

4 p.m. Grannis research

4:40 p.m. Tsybychev research

5:20 p.m. Executive session (Closed)

### Wednesday, Dec. 1

8:30 a.m. Executive session (Closed)

9:15 a.m. Rijssenbeek research (video)

9:55 a.m. Schamberger research

10:35 a.m. Break

10:50 a.m. Engelmann research

11:30 a.m. Hobbs research

12:10 p.m. Lunch

1:15 p.m. McCarthy research

2 p.m. Budget and Panel-PI discussion

3 p.m. Break 

3:15 p.m. Executive session (Closed)

*Reason for Closing:*                         The proposal contains proprietary or confidential material including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                    

Dated: November 16, 2010.

Susanne Bolton,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2010-29213 Filed 11-18-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
registration statements of Sepragen Corporation on Form S-8 (File
Nos. 33-95182 and 333-11903) of our report, which includes an
explanatory paragraph regarding the Company's ability to continue
as a going concern, dated April 10, 1998, on our audit of the
financial statements of Sepragen Corporation as of December 31,
1997, and for the year then ended, which report is included in
the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.











GRANT THORNTON LLP
/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
San Jose, California
April 10, 1998
§ 205.290 Temporary variances. ( a ) Temporary variances from the requirements in §§ 205.203 through 205.207, 205.236 through 205.240 and 205.270 through 205.272 may be established by the Administrator for the following reasons: ( 1 ) Natural disasters declared by the Secretary;
( 2 ) Damage caused by drought, wind, flood, excessive moisture, hail, tornado, earthquake, fire, or other business interruption; and
( 3 ) Practices used for the purpose of conducting research or trials of techniques, varieties, or ingredients used in organic production or handling.
( b ) A State organic program's governing State official or certifying agent may recommend in writing to the Administrator that a temporary variance from a standard set forth in subpart C of this part for organic production or handling operations be established: *Provided,* That, such variance is based on one or more of the reasons listed in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) The Administrator will provide written notification to certifying agents upon establishment of a temporary variance applicable to the certifying agent's certified production or handling operations and specify the period of time it shall remain in effect, subject to extension as the Administrator deems necessary.
( d ) A certifying agent, upon notification from the Administrator of the establishment of a temporary variance, must notify each production or handling operation it certifies to which the temporary variance applies.
( e ) Temporary variances will not be granted for any practice, material, or procedure prohibited under § 205.105.
[65 FR 80637, Dec. 21, 2000, as amended at 75 FR 7194, Feb. 17, 2010]