alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

MATHEW SELOVER

Plaintiff, 

vs. CASE NUMBER: 3:20-CV-4698-

TKW-HTC

 

ESCAMBIA COUNTY BOARD

OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS and

RAYME EDLER, 

Defendants.

 /

NOTICE OF SERVICE

Plaintiff, MATTHEW SELOVER, by and through the undersigned counsel, 

and gives notice to the Court and all parties that the Plaintiff served the Plaintiff’s 

Amended Expert Report upon the Defendants’ on the 12th day of May, 2021.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 12th day of May, 2021 a true and correct 

copy of the foregoing Notice was furnished to counsel for the Defendant as listed 

below via CMC/ECF, E-Mail and U.S. Mail.

 

 /s/ Travis P. Lampert

TRAVIS P. LAMPERT, ESQ. 

Florida Bar No. 0099843

Talbott, Lampert & Stoner, PA

900 East Moreno Street

Case 3:20-cv-04698-TKW-HTC Document 56 Filed 05/12/21 Page 1 of 2
Pensacola, FL 32503

(850) 437-9600 / (850) 437-0906 (facsimile)

Attorneys for Plaintiff

travis@talbottlawfirm.com

civilfilings@talbottlawfirm.com

SERVICE LIST

Stephanie Pidermann, Esquire

Katie Gudaitis, Esquire

Lydecker Diaz

1221 Brickell Avenue, 19th Floor

Miami, FL 33131

sp@lydeckerdiaz.com

kg@lydeckerdiaz.com

ksm@lydeckerdiaz.com

Attorneys for Defendant, Escambia County Board of County Commissioners

Cecily L. Kaffer, Esquire

Pro hac vice

The Kullman Firm

P.O. Box 1287

Mobile, AL 36633

clk@kullmanlaw.com

Attorney for Defendant, Rayme Edler

Case 3:20-cv-04698-TKW-HTC Document 56 Filed 05/12/21 Page 2 of 2
#### § 29.3105 Rule 2.

The determination of a grade shall be based upon a thorough examination of a lot of tobacco or of an official sample of the lot.
#### § 25.600 Purpose.

This subpart outlines USDA policies and authorizations and contains procedures for the USDA EZ/EC grant program.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>       5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM (A) CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT
DECEMBER 31, 1995 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                   <C>        
<PERIOD-TYPE>         YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                Dec-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                   Jan-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                     Dec-31-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1
<CASH>                               404,026
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                      5,145,418
<ALLOWANCES>                          60,246
<INVENTORY>                          238,624
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   6,476,043
<PP&E>                             9,317,480
<DEPRECIATION>                     4,612,375
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    19,515,201
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              6,081,150
<BONDS>                            2,707,459
<COMMON>                              39,173
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                        10,070,419
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      19,515,201
<SALES>                           31,032,357
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                  31,032,357
<CGS>                              6,920,796
<TOTAL-COSTS>                     21,655,747
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   7,874,991
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   452,306
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    1,049,314
<INCOME-TAX>                         592,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  457,314
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                         457,314
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0.11
        


</TABLE>
#### § 29.2569 Unstemmed.

A form of tobacco, including whole leaf and leaf scrap, from which the stems or midribs have not been removed.

[37 FR 13626, July 12, 1972. Redesignated at 49 FR 16757, Apr. 20, 1984 and 51 FR 40406, Nov. 7, 1986]
EXHIBIT 10(m)



 Exhibit 10(m) 
  
 Description of Washington Real Estate Investment Trust 
 Revised Trustee Compensation Plan 
  
 In November 2004, the Board of Trustees approved revisions to the Trustee Compensation Plan, which specifies the compensation of trustees who are not employees of the Trust. The first cash and share grant benefits
under the amended plan will be paid in 2005. 
  
 The plan, as revised, provides
for trustee compensation as follows: 
  

	 	•	 	The annual retainer will be increased from $20,004 to $25,000. 

  

	 	•	 	Board meeting fees will be eliminated. 

  

	 	•	 	Committee meeting fees will be $1,000 per meeting. 

  

	 	•	 	The Committee Chair annual retainers are as follows: 

  

			
	 1.      Audit Committee
	  	$7,500
	 2.      Corporate Governance Committee
	  	$3,000
	 3.      Compensation Committee
	  	$3,000

  

	 	•	 	Audit Committee members will be paid an additional annual retainer of $3,750. 

  


	 	•	 	Trustee annual long-tem incentive compensation will be changed from options for 2,000 shares plus 400 restricted shares to $30,000 in restricted shares. Restricted shares will vest
immediately and will be restricted from sale for the period of the Trustees’ service.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF KLLM TRANSPORT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             511
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   27,120
<ALLOWANCES>                                       416
<INVENTORY>                                        686
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,101
<PP&E>                                         145,589
<DEPRECIATION>                                  46,543
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 139,147
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,897
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,559
<OTHER-SE>                                      46,408
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   139,147
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               234,595
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  232,125
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (58)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,403
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (875)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (330)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (545)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (247)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (792)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.19)


</TABLE>
#### § 29.6033 Raw.

Tobacco as it appears between the time of harvesting and the beginning of the curing process.
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v John Porter and Nehemiah Ruffin, Respondents.

Appeal by the People from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered October 2, 1979, as dismissed the fourth count of the indictment against defendant Porter, and (2) an order of the same court entered November 21, 1979, which dismissed said count of the indictment against defendant Ruffin. Orders reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, and the fourth count of the indictment is reinstated as against defendants Porter and Ruffin. We deem the notice of appeal amended so as to reflect the correct dates of the orders appealed from. The proof before the Grand Jury was sufficient to sustain the fourth count of the indictment (see CPL 190.65, subd 1). At the accusatory stage, legally sufficient evidence is prima facie evidence, not proof beyond a reasonable doubt *(People v Mayo,*36 NY2d 1002, 1004). Mangano, J. P., Cohalan, Martuscello and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
Case 4:00-cr-00002-RH Document 139 Filed 06/27/05 Page 1 of 4
Case 4:00-cr-00002-RH Document 139 Filed 06/27/05 Page 2 of 4
Case 4:00-cr-00002-RH Document 139 Filed 06/27/05 Page 3 of 4
Case 4:00-cr-00002-RH Document 139 Filed 06/27/05 Page 4 of 4
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification of CFO Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of KapStone Paper andPackaging Corporation for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Andrea K. Tarbox,Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of KapStone Paper and PackagingCorporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                 The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2)                                 The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation.

 

Dated: July 30, 2009

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Andrea K. Tarbox                       |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Andrea K. Tarbox                           |
|   |   | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
#### Leslie Schupak, Appellant, v Donald C. Schupak et al., Respondents.

— Order (on the motion to quash a subpoena) of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 13, 1979, affirmed, without costs or disbursements, and cross appeal by plaintiff from a further order of the same court, also dated June 13, 1979, dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements. No opinion. Damiani, J. P., Titone, Cohalan and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
Editorial Note on Part 1955
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1955 appear at 80 FR 9895, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1955.109 Processing and closing (CONACT). ( a ) *Determining repayment ability and creditworthiness.* If a credit sale is involved, the applicant must furnish necessary financial information to assist in determining repayment ability and creditworthiness. Information regarding eligibility, planned development and total operations will be provided the same as for the respective type of FSA loan. Purchasers requesting credit on ineligible terms, except for C&BP, will be handled in accordance with subpart J of part 1951 of this chapter. For C&BP, information will be provided which is similar to an application including financial information required for the respective loan program to establish financial stability, creditworthiness and repayment ability.
( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) *Form of payment.* Payments at closing will be in the form of cash, cashier's check, certified check, postal or bank money order, or bank draft made payable to the Agency.
( d ) - ( e ) [Reserved]
( f ) *Earnest money.* Earnest money, if any, will be used to pay purchaser's closing costs with any balance of the costs being paid by the purchaser. Any excess earnest money will be credited to the purchase price or recognized as a part of the purchaser's downpayment.
( g ) *Closing and reporting sales.* Title clearance, loan closing and property insurance requirements for a credit sale will be the same as for a program loan, except the property will be conveyed by Form RD 1955-49, in accordance with § 1955.141(a) of this subpart.
( h ) *Classification.* Credit sales on ineligible terms for C&BP will be classified as NP loans and serviced accordingly.
( i ) [Reserved]
( j ) *Form RD 1910-11, “Applicant Certification, Federal Collection Policies for Consumer or Commercial Debts.”* The County Supervisor or District Director must review Form RD 1910-11 “Applicant Certification, Federal Collection Policies for Consumer or Commercial Debts,” with the applicant, and the form must be signed by the applicant.
[53 FR 35780, Sept. 14, 1988, as amended at 54 FR 29333, July 12, 1989; 58 FR 52652, Oct. 12, 1993; 60 FR 34455, July 3, 1995; 62 FR 44401, Aug. 21, 1997; 68 FR 61332, Oct. 28, 2003]
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATIONS
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Donald R. ChappelDonald R. ChappelChief Financial Officer of Williams Partners
GP LLC, general partner of Williams Partners L.P.
(Principal Financial Officer)
#### § 29.2398 Rule 7.

Any lot of tobacco which meets the specifications of two grades shall be placed in the higher grade. Any lot of tobacco on the marginal line between two grades shall be placed in the lower grade.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. Case No: 3:96cr19/RV

3:05cv283/RV/MD

MICHAEL LEE STRICKLIN

_____________________________________________________________________

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and

recommendation dated August 8, 2005. The defendant previously has been

furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section

636(b)(1), and I have made a de novo determination of those portions to which an

objection has been made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto

timely filed by the parties, I have determined that the report and recommendation

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2255 (doc. 153) is summarily DISMISSED as untimely.

DONE AND ORDERED this 8th day of September, 2005.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:96-cr-00019-RV Document 192 Filed 09/08/05 Page 1 of 1
Editorial Note on Part 1942
Editorial Notes: Nomenclature changes to part 1942 appear at 80 FR 9878, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1942.116 Economic feasibility requirements. All projects financed under this section must be based on taxes, assessments, revenues, fees, or other satisfactory sources of revenues in an amount sufficient to provide for facility operation and maintenance, a reasonable reserve, and debt payment. An overall review of the applicant's financial status, including a review of all assets and liabilities, will be a part of the docket review process by the Agency staff and approval official. All applicants will be expected to provide a financial feasibility report. These financial feasibility reports will normally be: ( a ) Included as part of the preliminary engineer/architectural report using guide 6 to subpart A of this part 1942 (available in any RD Office), or
( b ) Prepared by the applicant using Form RD 1942-54, “Applicant's Feasibility Report.”
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 223 (Friday, November 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70934-70935]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29164]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY


U.S. Customs and Border Protection Accreditation and Approval of 
Intertek USA, Inc., as a Commercial Gauger and Laboratory

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of accreditation and approval of Intertek USA, Inc., as 
a commercial gauger and laboratory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 
CFR 151.13, Intertek USA, Inc., 327 Erickson Ave., Essington, PA 19029, 
has been approved to gauge and accredited to test petroleum and 
petroleum products for customs purposes, in accordance with the 
provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ 
this entity to conduct laboratory analyses and gauger services should 
request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is 
accredited or approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to 
conduct the specific test or gauger service requested. Alternatively, 
inquires regarding the specific test or gauger service this entity is 
accredited or approved to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs 
and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also 
be sent to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#caa9a8bae4a6aba8a2bb8aaea2b9e4ada5bc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bbd8d9cb95d7dad9d3cafbdfd3c895dcd4cd">[email protected]</span></a>. Please reference the Web site listed 
below for a complete

[[Page 70935]]

listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories. 
http:[sol][sol]cbp.gov[sol]xp[sol]cgov[sol]import[sol]operations--
support[sol]labs--scientific--svcs[sol]commercial--gaugers[sol].

DATES: The accreditation and approval of Intertek USA, Inc., as 
commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on June 16, 2010. The 
next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for June 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony Malana, Laboratories and 
Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-
1060.

    Dated: November 8, 2010.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
[FR Doc. 2010-29164 Filed 11-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:98cr126LAC

MICHAEL BLANKENSHIP

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on MAY 2, 2008 

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION FOR REDUCTION OF SENTENCE PURSUANT TO TITLE 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) 

Filed by DEFENDANT PRO SE on5/2/08 Doc.# 260

RESPONSES:

GOVERNMENT on5/5/08 Doc.# 261

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Mary Maloy

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 13

th day of

June, 2008, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) Although the defendant’s base offense level may be reduced by 2 points

pursuant to Amendments 706, 711, and 715 to the Sentencing Guidelines, his

guideline imprisonment range would still remain 360 to life imprisonment. And,

as a designated career criminal, the defendant’s guideline imprisonment range for

Count I remains the statutory mandatory minimum term of Life imprisonment.

 s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 3:98-cr-00126-LC-MD Document 262 Filed 06/13/08 Page 1 of 1
###### Editorial Note on Part 1980

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1980 appear at 80 FR 9905, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1980.1003 Applicability of Program Regulations.

Except as supplemented by this subpart, the provisions of the programs identified in § 1980.1002 are incorporated into this subpart.