61268 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 197 / Friday, October 10, 2014 / Proposed Rules 

1 Federal Trade Commission: Telemarketing Sales 

Rule, Rule Review, 79 FR 46732 (Aug. 11, 2014). 

ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file a 

comment online or on paper, by 

following the instructions in the 

Request for Comment part of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

below. Write ‘‘Telemarketing Sales Rule 

Regulatory Review, 16 CFR Part 310, 

Project No. R411001’’ on your comment. 

File your comment online at https://

ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/

telemarketingsalesnprm by following 

the instructions on the Web-based form. 

If you prefer to file your comment on 

paper, mail your comment to the 

following address: Federal Trade 

Commission, Office of the Secretary, 

600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite 

CC–5610 (Annex B), Washington, DC 

20580, or deliver your comment to the 

following address: Federal Trade 

Commission, Office of the Secretary, 

Constitution Center, 400 7th Street SW., 

5th Floor, Suite 5610 (Annex B), 

Washington, DC 20024. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission is extending the comment 

period for its rule review of the TSR to 

November 13, 2014. The Commission’s 

Notice requesting public comment 

posed an extensive list of questions on 

the costs, benefits and efficacy of the 

TSR in the marketplace, and whether 

the Commission should retain, modify, 

or rescind it.1 The Commission also 

specifically requested comment on three 

issues: (1) Whether the preaquired 

account information provisions of the 

TSR should be modified in view of 

current credit card association rules and 

the Restore Online Shoppers Confidence 

Act, 15 U.S.C. 8401 (2010); (2) what 

impact, if any, the increasing use of 

general media to solicit inbound calls 

from consumers to purchase a variety of 

goods or services, including those 

involving a negative option or free trial, 

is having; and (3) the costs and burdens 

of modifying the recordkeeping 

requirements of the TSR to require 

telemarketers to retain their own call 

records. The regulatory review comment 

period was to end on October 14, 2014. 

In a letter dated September 25, 2014, 

which the Commission received on 

September 29, 2014, the Professional 

Association for Customer Engagement 

(‘‘PACE’’) requested that the 

Commission extend the comment period 

for an additional two months. The 

Commission recognizes that the 

extensive list of questions on which it 

has requested public comment raise 

significant issues and believes that 

extending the comment period for 30 

days will be sufficient to facilitate a 

more complete record. 

You can file a comment online or on 

paper. For the Commission to consider 

your comment, we must receive it on or 

before November 13, 2014. Write 

‘‘Telemarketing Sales Rule Regulatory 

Review, 16 CFR Part 310, Project No. 

R411001’’ on your comment. Your 

comment—including your name and 

your state—will be placed on the public 

record of this proceeding, including, to 

the extent practicable, on the public 

Commission Web site, at http://www.ftc.

gov/os/publiccomments.shtm. As a 

matter of discretion, the Commission 

tries to remove individuals’ home 

contact information from comments 

before placing them on the Commission 

Web site. 

Because your comment will be made 

public, you are solely responsible for 

making sure that your comment doesn’t 

include any sensitive personal 

information, such as anyone’s Social 

Security number, date of birth, driver’s 

license number or other state 

identification number or foreign country 

equivalent, passport number, financial 

account number, or credit or debit card 

number. You are also solely responsible 

for making sure that your comment does 

not include any sensitive health 

information, such as medical records or 

other individually identifiable health 

information. In addition, do not include 

any ‘‘[t]rade secret or any commercial or 

financial information . . . which is 

privileged or confidential,’’ as provided 

in Section 6(f) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 

46(f), and FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR 

4.10(a)(2). In particular, do not include 

competitively sensitive information 

such as costs, sales statistics, 

inventories, formulas, patterns, devices, 

manufacturing processes, or customer 

names. If you want the Commission to 

give your comment confidential 

treatment, you must file it in paper 

form, with a request for confidential 

treatment, and you have to follow the 

procedure explained in FTC Rule 4.9(c), 

16 CFR 4.9(c). Your comment will be 

kept confidential only if the FTC 

General Counsel grants your request in 

accordance with the law and the public 

interest. 

Postal mail addressed to the 

Commission is subject to delay due to 

heightened security screening. As a 

result, we encourage you to submit your 

comments online. To make sure that the 

Commission considers your online 

comment, you must file it at https://

ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/

telemarketingsalesnprm, by following 

the instructions on the Web-based form. 

If this Notice appears at http://

www.regulations.gov, you also may file 

a comment through that Web site. 

If you prefer to file your comment on 

paper, write ‘‘Telemarketing Sales Rule 

Regulatory Review, 16 CFR Part 310, 

Project No. R411001’’ on your comment 

and on the envelope and mail your 

comment to the following address: 

Federal Trade Commission, Office of the 

Secretary, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue 

NW., Suite CC–5610 (Annex B), 

Washington, DC 20580, or deliver your 

comment to the following address: 

Federal Trade Commission, Office of the 

Secretary, Constitution Center, 400 7th 

Street SW., 5th Floor, Suite 5610 

(Annex B), Washington, DC 20024. If 

possible, submit your paper comment to 

the Commission by courier or overnight 

service. 

Visit the Commission Web site at 

http://www.ftc.gov to read the August 

11, 2014 Notice and the news release 

describing it. The FTC Act and other 

laws that the Commission administers 

permit the collection of public 

comments to consider and use in this 

proceeding as appropriate. 

The Commission will consider all 

timely and responsive public comments 

that it receives on or before November 

13, 2014. You can find more 

information, including routine uses 

permitted by the Privacy Act, in the 

Commission’s privacy policy, at http:// 

www.ftc.gov/ftc/privacy.htm. 

By direction of the Commission. 

Janice Podoll Frankle, 

Acting Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2014–24247 Filed 10–9–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6750–01–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Parts 191 and 194 

[EPA–HQ–OAR–2014–0609; FRL–9917–73– 

OAR] 

Review Process To Determine Whether 

the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant 

Continues To Comply With the 

Disposal Regulations and Compliance 

Criteria 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

ACTION: Notice of availability; official 

opening of public comment period. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA, or the Agency) intends to 

evaluate whether or not the Waste 

Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) continues to 

comply with the Agency’s 

environmental radiation protection 

standards for the disposal of radioactive 

waste. Pursuant to the 1992 WIPP Land 

Withdrawal Act (LWA), as amended, the 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 197 / Friday, October 10, 2014 / Proposed Rules 61269 

U.S. Department of Energy (DOE, or the 

Department) must submit 

documentation of continued compliance 

with the EPA’s standards for disposal 

and other statutory requirements every 

five years after the initial receipt of 

transuranic waste at WIPP. 

The DOE’s 2014 Compliance 

Recertification Application (CRA) was 

received by the EPA on March 26, 2014, 

and a copy may be found on the EPA’s 

WIPP Web site (http://www.epa.gov/

radiation/wipp/2014application.html) 

and in the public dockets (see 

ADDRESSES Section). The EPA will 

determine when the DOE has provided 

a complete application; the Agency’s 

completeness determination will be 

conveyed to the DOE and published in 

the Federal Register. The EPA will 

evaluate the ‘‘complete’’ application in 

determining whether the WIPP facility 

continues to comply with the radiation 

protection standards for disposal. The 

Agency requests public comment on all 

aspects of the DOE’s application. 

DATES: Comments in response to DOE’s 

2014 recertification application must be 

received by the end of the comment 

period. The comment period will extend 

beyond the time when the EPA notifies 

the DOE that the recertification 

application is complete. The ending 

date of the public comment period will 

be specified in a subsequent Federal 

Register document. Announcements 

will be published in the Federal 

Register to provide information on the 

Agency’s completeness determination 

and final recertification decision. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– 

OAR–2014–0609, by one of the 

following methods: 

• www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• Email: to a-and-r-docket@epa.gov. 

• Fax: 202–566–1741. 

• Mail: Air and Radiation Docket and 

Information Center, Environmental 

Protection Agency, Mailcode: 6102T, 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., 

Washington, DC 20460. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Attn: Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR– 

2014–0609. The Agency’s policy is that 

all comments received will be included 

in the public docket without change and 

may be made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through www.regulations.gov 

or email. The www.regulations.gov Web 

site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, 

which means the EPA will not know 

your identity or contact information 

unless you provide it in the body of 

your comment. If you send an email 

comment directly to the EPA without 

going through www.regulations.gov your 

email address will be automatically 

captured and included as part of the 

comment that is placed in the public 

docket and made available on the 

Internet. If you submit an electronic 

comment, the EPA recommends that 

you include your name and other 

contact information in the body of your 

comment and with any disk or CD–ROM 

you submit. If the EPA cannot read your 

comment due to technical difficulties 

and cannot contact you for clarification, 

the EPA may not be able to consider 

your comment. Electronic files should 

avoid the use of special characters or 

any form of encryption and be free of 

any defects or viruses. For additional 

information about the EPA’s public 

docket visit the EPA Docket Center 

homepage at http://www.epa.gov/

epahome/dockets.htm. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the www.regulations.gov 

index. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, e.g., CBI or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, will be publicly 

available only in hard copy. Publicly 

available docket materials are available 

either electronically at 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Air and Radiation Docket, the EPA/ 

DC, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 

Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, 

DC. The Public Reading Room is open 

from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, excluding legal 

holidays. The telephone number for the 

Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, 

and the telephone number for the Air 

and Radiation Docket is (202) 566–1742. 

As provided in the EPA’s regulations at 

40 CFR part 2, and in accordance with 

normal the EPA docket procedures, if 

copies of any docket materials are 

requested, a reasonable fee may be 

charged for photocopying. 

These documents are also available 

for review in electronic (CD/DVD) 

format at the WIPP Information Center 

in DOE’s Carlsbad Field Office (SkeenWhitlock Building). The Carlsbad WIPP 

Information Center is open from 8:00 

a.m. to 3:00 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, excluding legal holidays. The 

telephone number for the WIPP 

Information Center is 1–800–336–WIPP. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ray 

Lee, Office of Radiation and Indoor Air, 

Radiation Protection Division, Center 

for Radiation Information and Outreach, 

Mail Code 6608T, U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania 

Avenue, Washington, DC 20460; 

telephone number: 202–343–9463; fax 

number: 202–343–2305; email address: 

lee.raymond@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. What should I consider as I prepare 

my comments for the EPA? 

1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this 

information to the EPA through 

www.regulations.gov or email. Clearly 

mark the information that you claim to 

be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or 

CD–ROM that you mail to the EPA, 

mark the outside of the disk or CD–ROM 

as CBI and then identify electronically 

within the disk or CD–ROM the specific 

information that is claimed as CBI. In 

addition to one complete version of the 

comment that includes information 

claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment 

that does not contain the information 

claimed as CBI must be submitted for 

inclusion in the public docket. 

Information so marked will not be 

disclosed except in accordance with 

procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. 

2. Tips for Preparing Your Comments. 

When submitting comments, remember 

to: 

• Identify the rulemaking by docket 

number and other identifying 

information (subject heading, Federal 

Register date and page number). 

• Follow directions—the agency may 

ask you to respond to specific questions 

or organize comments by referencing a 

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 

or section number. 

• Explain why you agree or disagree; 

suggest alternatives and substitute 

language for your requested changes. 

• Describe any assumptions and 

provide any technical information and/ 

or data that you used. 

• If you estimate potential costs or 

burdens, explain how you arrived at 

your estimate in sufficient detail to 

allow for it to be reproduced. 

• Provide specific examples to 

illustrate your concerns, and suggest 

alternatives. 

• Explain your views as clearly as 

possible, avoiding the use of profanity 

or personal threats. 

• Make sure to submit your 

comments by the comment period 

deadline identified. 

II. Background 

The WIPP was authorized in 1980, 

under section 213 of the DOE National 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

61270 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 197 / Friday, October 10, 2014 / Proposed Rules 

1The 1992 WIPP Land Withdrawal Act was 

amended by the ‘‘Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Land 

Withdrawal Act Amendments,’’ which were part of 

the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 1997. 

Security and Military Applications of 

Nuclear Energy Authorization Act of 

1980 (Pub. L. 96–164, 93 Stat. 1259, 

1265), ‘‘for the express purpose of 

providing a research and development 

facility to demonstrate the safe disposal 

of radioactive wastes resulting from the 

defense activities and programs of the 

United States.’’ The WIPP is a disposal 

system for transuranic (TRU) radioactive 

waste. Developed by the DOE, the 

facility is located near Carlsbad in 

southeastern New Mexico. TRU waste is 

emplaced 2,150 feet underground in an 

ancient layer of salt that will eventually 

‘‘creep’’ and encapsulate the waste 

containers. The WIPP has a total 

capacity of 6.2 million cubic feet of TRU 

waste. 

The 1992 WIPP LWA (Pub. L. 102– 

579) 1 limits radioactive waste disposal 

in the WIPP to TRU radioactive wastes 

generated by defense-related activities. 

TRU waste is defined as waste 

containing more than 100 nano-curies 

per gram of alpha-emitting radioactive 

isotopes, with half-lives greater than 

twenty years and atomic numbers 

greater than 92. The Act further 

stipulates that radioactive waste shall 

not be TRU waste if such waste also 

meets the definition of high-level 

radioactive waste, has been specifically 

exempted from regulation with the 

concurrence of the Administrator, or has 

been approved for an alternate method 

of disposal by the Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission. The TRU radioactive 

waste proposed for disposal in the WIPP 

consists of materials such as rags, 

equipment, tools, protective gear and 

sludges that have become contaminated 

during atomic energy defense activities. 

The radioactive component of TRU 

waste consists of man-made elements 

created during the process of nuclear 

fission, chiefly isotopes of plutonium. 

Some TRU waste is contaminated with 

hazardous wastes regulated under the 

Resource Conservation and Recovery 

Act (RCRA; 42 U.S.C. 6901–6992k). The 

waste proposed for disposal at the WIPP 

derives from Federal facilities across the 

United States, including locations in 

Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, Nevada, 

Ohio, South Carolina, Tennessee, and 

Washington. 

The WIPP must meet the EPA’s 

generic disposal standards at 40 CFR 

Part 191, Subparts B and C, for highlevel and TRU radioactive waste. These 

standards limit releases of radioactive 

materials from disposal systems for 

radioactive waste, and require 

implementation of measures to provide 

confidence for compliance with the 

radiation release limits. Additionally, 

the regulations limit radiation doses to 

members of the public, and protect 

ground water resources by establishing 

maximum concentrations for 

radionuclides in ground water. To 

determine whether the WIPP facility 

meets these disposal standards, the 

Agency issued the 1997 WIPP 

Compliance Criteria (40 CFR part 194), 

which interprets and implement the 

disposal standards specifically for the 

WIPP site. The Compliance Criteria— 

along with its accompanying preamble 

and supporting documents—describe 

what information the DOE must provide 

and how the EPA evaluates WIPP’s 

performance and provides ongoing 

independent oversight. Thus, the 

Agency implemented its environmental 

radiation protection standards, 40 CFR 

part 191, by applying the WIPP 

Compliance Criteria, 40 CFR part 194, to 

the disposal of TRU radioactive waste at 

the WIPP. For more information about 

40 CFR part 191, refer to Federal 

Register notices published in 1985 (50 

FR 38066–38089, September 19, 1985) 

and 1993 (58 FR 66398–66416, 

December 20, 1993). For more 

information about 40 CFR part 194, refer 

to Federal Register notices published in 

1996 (61 FR 5224–5245, February 9, 

1996) and 1995 (60 FR 5766–5791, 

January 30, 1995). 

Using the process outlined in the 

WIPP Compliance Criteria, the EPA 

determined on May 18, 1998 (63 FR 

27354), that DOE had demonstrated that 

the WIPP complied with Agency’s 

radioactive waste disposal regulations at 

subparts B and C of 40 CFR part 191. 

The EPA’s certification determination 

permitted the WIPP to begin accepting 

TRU waste for disposal, provided that 

other applicable conditions and 

environmental regulations were met. 

Since the 1998 certification decision, 

the EPA has conducted ongoing 

independent technical review and 

inspections of all WIPP activities related 

to compliance with the EPA’s disposal 

regulations. The initial certification 

decision identified the starting 

(baseline) conditions for the WIPP site 

and established the waste and facility 

characteristics necessary to ensure 

proper disposal in accordance with the 

regulations. At that time, the EPA and 

the DOE understood that future 

information and knowledge gained from 

the actual operations of the WIPP would 

result in changes to best practices and 

procedures for the facility. 

In recognition of this, section 8(f) of 

the amended WIPP LWA requires the 

EPA to evaluate all changes in 

conditions or activities at the WIPP 

every five years to determine if the 

facility continues to comply with the 

Agency’s disposal regulations. This 

determination is not subject to standard 

rulemaking procedures or judicial 

review, as stated in the aforementioned 

section of the WIPP LWA. 

The first recertification process began 

with the DOE’s submittal of the initial 

CRA, which was received by the Agency 

on March 26, 2004. The EPA deemed 

the CRA–2004 to be complete on 

September 29, 2005, and published its 

first WIPP recertification decision on 

March 29, 2006 (71 FR 18010). 

The EPA received the Department’s 

second CRA on March 24, 2009. The 

Agency deemed the CRA–2009 to be 

complete on June 29, 2010, and 

published the second WIPP 

recertification decision on November 

18, 2010 (75 FR 70584). 

The EPA received the Department’s 

third CRA on March 26, 2014. After EPA 

has determined that the application is 

complete, the Agency will review the 

CRA–2014 to ensure that all of the 

changes made at the WIPP since the 

second recertification process have been 

accurately reflected and that the facility 

will continue to safely contain TRU 

radioactive waste. If the EPA approves 

the CRA–2014, it will set the parameters 

for how the WIPP will be operated by 

the DOE over the next five years. This 

approved CRA–2014 (along with any 

supplemental completeness information 

submitted by the DOE) will then serve 

as the baseline for the next 

recertification that will occur starting in 

2019. 

An important consideration in the 

EPA’s review of the DOE’s CRA–2014 is 

the radiation release that took place in 

the WIPP’s underground disposal area 

in February 2014. Recovery activities 

are currently ongoing. EPA conducted 

oversight activities in response to the 

incident and these activities are 

discussed on EPA’s Web site (http://

www.epa.gov/radiation/news/wippnews.html#wippradevent). EPA’s review 

confirmed that DOE remains in 

compliance with EPA’s standards; 

however, EPA identified several areas 

where improvements would enhance 

DOE’s ability to provide the best 

possible information to the public and 

its partner agencies during a release. 

Although the incident took place after 

the preparation of the CRA–2014, the 

Department has indicated that changes 

will need to be made to the WIPP 

disposal system in order to reopen the 

facility and that the DOE will provide 

supplemental information to the Agency 

on the incident and potential 

ramifications on compliance. This 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 197 / Friday, October 10, 2014 / Proposed Rules 61271 

information will be made available in 

the Agency’s public dockets and posted 

on EPA’s WIPP Web site. The EPA is 

currently considering how anticipated 

changes in the facility design will 

impact the recertification process. 

With today’s notice, the Agency 

solicits public comment on the DOE’s 

documentation of whether the WIPP 

facility continues to comply with the 

disposal regulations. A copy of the 

application is available for inspection 

on the EPA’s WIPP Web site (http://

www.epa.gov/radiation/wipp/

2014application.html) and in the public 

dockets described in the ADDRESSES

section. Other background information 

related to the Agency’s recertification 

activities are also available in our public 

dockets and on our WIPP Web site. The 

EPA will evaluate the complete 

application in determining whether the 

WIPP continues to comply with the 

radiation protection standards for 

disposal. In addition, the EPA will 

consider public comment and other 

information relevant to the WIPP’s 

compliance. The Agency is most 

interested in public comment on issues 

where changes have occurred that may 

potentially impact the WIPP’s ability to 

remain in compliance with the 

requirements in the EPA’s disposal 

regulations, as well as any areas where 

the public believes that changes have 

occurred and have not been identified 

by the DOE. Additionally the Agency 

expects to provide public meetings in 

New Mexico during the review process 

to encourage and facilitate participation 

by interested stakeholders. 

The first step in the recertification 

process is a ‘‘completeness’’ 

determination. The EPA will make this 

completeness determination as a first 

step in its more extensive technical 

review of the application. This 

determination is based on a number of 

the Agency’s WIPP-specific guidances, 

most notably, the ‘‘Compliance 

Application Guidance’’ (CAG; EPA Pub. 

402–R–95–014) and ‘‘Guidance to the 

U.S. Department of Energy on 

Preparation for Recertification of the 

Waste Isolation Pilot Plant with 40 CFR 

Parts 191 and 194’’ (Docket A–98–49, 

Item II–B3–14; December 12, 2000). 

Both guidance documents include 

guidelines regarding: (1) Content of 

certification/recertification applications; 

(2) documentation and format 

requirements; (3) time frame and 

evaluation process; and (4) change 

reporting and modification. The Agency 

developed these guidance documents to 

assist the DOE with the preparation of 

any compliance application for the 

WIPP. It is the Agency’s intent that 

these guidance documents give the DOE 

and the public a general understanding 

of the information that is expected to be 

included in a complete application of 

compliance. However, the DOE does not 

have to resubmit information already 

supplied to the EPA in prior 

recertification applications. Thus, the 

focus of each recertification is on any 

changes to the disposal system since the 

previous recertification decision (in this 

case, 2009–2010). The EPA may request 

additional information as necessary 

from the Department to ensure the 

completeness of the CRA. 

Once the 2014 recertification 

application is deemed complete, the 

EPA will provide the DOE with written 

notification of its completeness 

determination and publish a Federal 

Register notice announcing this 

determination. All correspondence 

between the EPA and the DOE regarding 

the completeness of the CRA–2014, as 

well as any additional supplemental 

information submitted by the 

Department, will be posted on our Web 

site and placed in the public dockets. 

The EPA will make a final decision as 

to whether the WIPP continues to meet 

the disposal regulations after each of the 

aforementioned steps (technical analysis 

of the application, issuance of a notice 

on the CRA–2014’s completeness in the 

Federal Register, and analyses of public 

comment) have been completed. As 

required by the WIPP LWA, the Agency 

will make a final recertification decision 

within six months of issuing its 

completeness determination. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 191 and 

194 

Environmental protection, Radiation 

protection, Transuranic radioactive 

waste, Waste treatment and disposal, 

Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. 

Dated: October 1, 2014. 

Michael P. Flynn, 

Director, Office of Radiation and Indoor Air. 

[FR Doc. 2014–24260 Filed 10–9–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 73 

[MB Docket No. 13–51; RM–11692; DA 14– 

1362] 

Radio Broadcasting Services; 

Ehrenberg, Arizona 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Proposal rule; dismissal. 

SUMMARY: The Audio Division dismisses 

as moot the Petition for Rule Making 

filed by S and H Broadcasting, LLC, 

proposing the substitution for Channel 

228C2 for vacant Channel 286C2 at 

Ehrenberg, Arizona because the channel 

substitution was made in another 

proceeding, MB Docket No. 11–207. The 

Audio Division also grants the ‘‘hybrid’’ 

application for Station KQCM, North 

Shore, California, File No. BPH– 

20120316ABT. 

DATES: October 10, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Secretary, Federal 

Communications Commission, 445 

12fth Street SW., Washington, DC 

20554. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Rolanda F. Smith, Media Bureau, (202) 

418–2700. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

synopsis of the Report and Order, MB 

Docket No. 13–51, adopted September 

18, 2014, and released September 19, 

2014. The full text of this Commission 

decision is available for inspection and 

copying during normal business hours 

in the FCC’s Reference Information 

Center at Portals II, CY–A257, 445 12th 

Street SW., Washington, DC 20554. This 

document may also be purchased from 

the Commission’s duplicating 

contractors, Best Copy and Printing, 

Inc., 445 12th Street SW., Room CY– 

B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone 

1–800–378–3160 or via email 

www.BCPIWEB.com. This document 

does not contain information collection 

requirements subject to the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104– 

13. This document is not subject to the 

Congressional Review Act. (The 

Commission is not required to submit a 

copy of this Report and Order to 

Government Accountability Office, 

pursuant to the Congressional Review 

Act, see 5 U.S.C. Section 801(a)(1)(A) 

because no rule changes were made). 

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73 

Radio, Radio broadcasting. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Nazifa Sawez, 

Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media 

Bureau. 

[FR Doc. 2014–24113 Filed 10–9–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS