alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:02-cr-00045-MP -AK

CRAIG CHARLES BOLLES,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 188, Objection to Report and Recommendation

filed by Craig Charles Bolles. Defendant has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's report

and recommendation, which the Court adopted on September 20, 2007. Pursuant to the report

and recommendation, the Court granted Defendant's motion to vacate and reimposed the same

sentence to allow Defendant the opportunity to file an appeal. The Court did not address the

other grounds raised since the result was dispositive of the motion. Defendant never filed an

appeal and now asks the Court to conduct a de novo review of the other grounds of Defendant's

motion to vacate. Since Defendant’s motion to vacate was granted, addressing any other

grounds for vacatur would be only surplusage. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. Defendant’s request for de novo review of his Motion to Vacate is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 17th day of May, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:02-cr-00045-MP-GRJ Document 189 Filed 05/17/11 Page 1 of 1
Lunar-Mars Life Support Test Project:Phase III Final Report

 

CTSD-ADV-341

Engineering Directorate

Crew and Thermal Systems Division

 

 

February 23, 2000

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center

Houston, Texas   77058

| Next Page |
|-----------|
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 222 (Thursday, November 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 70732]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29066]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PR10-92-001]


Enterprise Texas Pipeline LLC; Notice of Baseline Filing

November 10, 2010.
    Take notice that on November 9, 2010, Enterprise Texas Pipeline LLC 
submitted a revised baseline filing of its Statement of Operating 
Conditions for services provided under section 311 of the Natural Gas 
Policy Act of 1978 (NGPA).
    Any person desiring to participate in this rate proceeding must 
file a motion to intervene or to protest this filing must file in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered 
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, 
but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or 
motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests 
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing 
an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on the 
Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before the 
intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or 
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 7 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c0868592838faeaca9aea593b5b0b0afb2b480a6a5b2a3eea7afb6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f9bfbcabbab6979590979caa8c8989968b8db99f9c8b9ad79e968f">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, November 19, 2010.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-29066 Filed 11-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Editorial Note on Part 1944
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1944 appear at 80 FR 9885, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1944.53 Grantee eligibility. An eligible grantee is an organization as defined in § 1944.52 of this subpart and has received a current “Certificate of Training” pertaining to the type of application being packaged. In addition, the grantee must: ( a ) Have the financial, legal, and administrative capacity to carry out the responsibilities of packaging housing applications for very low- and low-income applicants. To meet this requirement it must have the necessary background and experience with proven ability to perform responsibly in the field of housing application packaging, low-income housing development, or other business or administrative ventures which indicate an ability to perform responsibly in this field of housing application packaging.
( b ) Legally obligate itself to administer grant funds, provide adequate accounting of the expenditure of such funds, and comply with Rural Development regulations.
( c ) If the organization is a private nonprofit corporation, be a corporation that: ( 1 ) Is organized under State and local laws.
( 2 ) Is qualified under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
( 3 ) Has as one of its purposes assisting very low- and low-income families to obtain affordable housing.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 

vs. Case No. 3:19cr113/ MCR

TERRELL BURDETTE,

_________________________________________________________________

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me pursuant to Rule 11, Fed. 

R. Crim. P., and has entered a plea of guilty to Counts I, II, III, IV, and VI of the 

Indictment. After cautioning and examining the Defendant under oath concerning 

each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, I determined that the guilty plea was 

knowing and voluntary, and that the offenses charged are supported by an 

independent basis in fact containing each of the essential elements of such offenses. 

I therefore recommend that the plea of guilty be accepted and that the Defendant be 

adjudicated guilty and have sentence imposed accordingly.

Dated: May 29, 2020

/s/ Charles J. Kahn, Jr. 

CHARLES J. KAHN, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:19-cr-00113-MCR Document 148 Filed 05/29/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No.: 3:19cr113/MCR

NOTICE

Objections to these proposed findings and recommendations must be filed 

within twenty four (24) hours after being served a copy thereof. Any different 

deadline that may appear on the electronic docket is for the court=s internal use only, 

and does not control. A copy of objections shall be served upon all other parties. If 

a party fails to object to the magistrate judge's findings or recommendations as to any 

particular claim or issue contained in a report and recommendation, that party 

waives the right to challenge on appeal the district court's order based on the 

unobjected-to factual and legal conclusions. See 11th Cir. Rule 3-1; 28 U.S.C. ' 636.

Case 3:19-cr-00113-MCR Document 148 Filed 05/29/20 Page 2 of 2
0.0

1.02.03.04.05.06.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 

Weighted Emissions ‐ g/ho

Ranking

Pellet Heater Weighted Average Emissions Distribution:

Includes additional Data Points from ICR

Washington State Limit (4.5 g/hr) for Non‐Catalytic Heaters
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 4:02-CR-062-SPM

CARLOS LIMON-JUAREZ,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

AND DENYING MOTION TO VACATE SENTENCE

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the magistrate judge's report

and recommendation (doc. 163) filed August 23, 2006. The parties have been

furnished a copy and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections. No

objections were filed.

Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), I have

determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 163) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

Case 4:02-cr-00062-MW-AK Document 164 Filed 09/26/06 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

2. The motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence (doc. 153), as

supplemented by doc. 160, is hereby denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this twenty-fifth day of September, 2006.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 4:02-cr-00062-MW-AK Document 164 Filed 09/26/06 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2294 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2294

  To remove from the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System 
                 certain properties in North Carolina.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 6, 2013

 Mr. McIntyre introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To remove from the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System 
                 certain properties in North Carolina.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF PROPERTIES IN NORTH CAROLINA FROM JOHN H. CHAFEE 
              COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of the Interior shall revise one or 
more maps included in the set of maps entitled ``Coastal Barrier 
Resources System'' referred to in section 4(a) of the Coastal Barrier 
Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)) and relating to John H. Chafee 
Coastal Barrier Resources System units in North Carolina, as necessary 
to remove from such system the properties located at the following 
postal addresses:
            (1) Lot Number 3, Waters Edge in Hampstead, NC 28443.
            (2) 182 S Beach Road, Wilmington, NC 28405.
            (3) 311 Windchase Lane, Wilmington, NC 28409.
            (4) 225 Chimney Lane Wilmington, NC 28411.
    (b) Availability.--The Secretary of the Interior shall keep each 
map revised under subsection (a) on file and available for inspection 
in accordance with section 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act 
(16 U.S.C. 3503(b)).
                                 <all>
```
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. Case No: 3:98cr24/RV

3:08cv312/RV/MD

STERLING K. WESTBERRY

_____________________________________________________________________

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and

recommendation dated July 23, 2008. The defendant previously has been furnished

a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to

file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have

made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been

made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto

timely filed by the parties, I have determined that the report and recommendation

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2255 (doc. 116) is summarily DISMISSED as successive, and defendant’s

alternative request for relief pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 5th day of August, 2008.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:98-cr-00024-RV-MD Document 93 Filed 08/05/08 Page 1 of 1
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2112 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

787 State Route 17M in Monroe, New York, as the ‘‘National Clandestine Service of the Central Intelligence Agency NCS Officer Gregg David 

Wenzel Memorial Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 22, 2013 

Mr. SEAN PATRICK MALONEY of New York (for himself, Mr. HIGGINS, Mr. 

KING of New York, Mr. MAFFEI, Mr. OWENS, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. GRIMM, 

Mr. HANNA, Ms. CLARKE, Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. COLLINS of New York, 

Ms. MENG, Mr. ENGEL, Mrs. MCCARTHY of New York, Mr. TONKO, Mrs. 

CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York, Mr. GIBSON, Ms. SLAUGHTER, and 

Mr. ISRAEL) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 787 State Route 17M in Monroe, New York, 

as the ‘‘National Clandestine Service of the Central Intelligence Agency NCS Officer Gregg David Wenzel Memorial Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2112 IH

1 SECTION 1. NATIONAL CLANDESTINE SERVICE OF THE 

2 CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY NCS OFFI3 CER GREGG DAVID WENZEL MEMORIAL POST 

4 OFFICE. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 787 State Route 17M in Monroe, 

7 New York, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Na8 tional Clandestine Service of the Central Intelligence 

9 Agency NCS Officer Gregg David Wenzel Memorial Post 

10 Office’’. 

11 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg12 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

13 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

14 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘National Clandestine 

15 Service of the Central Intelligence Agency NCS Officer 

16 Gregg David Wenzel Memorial Post Office’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED **

**PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1. | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of section                13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                March 23, 2006 | /s/                Ronald A. Brenneman                              |
|-------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                | Ronald                A. Brenneman                                  |
|                                | President                and Chief Executive                Officer |
###### Editorial Note on Part 1955

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1955 appear at 80 FR 9895, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1955.13 Acquisition of property by exercise of Government redemption rights.

When the Government did not protect its interest in security property in a foreclosure by another lienholder, and if the Government has redemption rights, the State Director will determine whether to redeem the property. This determination will be based on all pertinent factors including the value of the property after the sale, and costs which may be incurred in acquiring and reselling the property. For Farmer Program loans, the County Supervisor will document the determination on exhibit G of this subpart. The decision must be made far enough in advance of expiration of the redemption period to permit exercise of the Government's rights. If the property is to be redeemed, complete information documenting the basis for not acquiring the property at the sale and factors which justify redemption of the property will be included in the case file. The assistance of OGC will be obtained in effecting the redemption. If the State Director decides not to redeem the property, the Government's right of redemption under Federal law (28 U.S.C. 2410) may be waived without consideration. If a State law right of redemption exists and may be sold, it will not be disposed of for less than its value.

[53 FR 35762, Sept. 14, 1988]
§ 1728.40 Procedure for submission of a proposal. ( a ) *Written Request.* Consideration of an item of material or equipment will be obtained by the sponsor through the submission of a written request in an original and five copies addressed to the Chairman, Technical Standards Committee “A” (Electric). The letter must include the catalog number or other identifying number or code as well as a description of the item. In the event that an item being submitted is also intended for consideration by Technical Standards Committee “A” (Telephone), a separate request must be made to the telephone committee. (See part 1755 of this chapter).
( b ) *Technical and Performance Data.* Six copies of the specification of manufacture, drawings and test data must be submitted to the committee. Six copies of the performance history shall also be submitted unless RUS determines that such performance history is not reasonably available.
( c ) *Sample.* One sample of the item must be submitted to the Chairman, Technical Standards Committee “A,” unless RUS waives the requirements of the sample. In case of large, bulky or extremely heavy samples, the sponsor should contact the Chairman, Technical Standards Committee “A” (Electric), at the above address, before any sample is shipped.
( d ) *Action on Proposal.* RUS will inform a sponsor of the action taken on the sponsor's proposal.
[50 FR 47711, Nov. 20, 1985. Redesignated at 55 FR 39395, Sept. 27, 1990]
Exhibit 10.2
 
  
   BASE PAY COMPENSATION.
 SIGN-ON BONUS.
 INCENTIVE PAY COMPENSATION.
 PARTICIPATION PLAN.
 VACATION.
 BENEFITS.
 BUSINESS EXPENSES.
 American Commercial Lines




---



##### 



RELOCATON EXPENSES.
 CONDITIONS.
 SEVERANCE.
  American Commercial Lines




---



##### 



AT WILL EMPLOYMENT.
 ARBITRATION.
 KEY PERSON INSURANCE.
 GENERAL.
 SECTION 409A.
 American Commercial Lines




---



##### 



Very truly yours,/s/ Eva M. Kalawski

Eva M. KalawskiVice President and Secretary
 
 /s/ Mark Klee Knoy

Mark Klee Knoy
 American Commercial Lines
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**AFFINITY GROUP HOLDING, INC.**

 

**STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

 

I, Thomas F. Wolfe, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officerof Affinity Group Holding, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),hereby certify as follows:

 

1.                                       This statementis provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 in connection with theCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31,2008 (the “Periodic Report”);

 

2.                                       The PeriodicReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

3.                                       The informationcontained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company as of dates andfor the periods indicated therein.

 

 

Date:  May 9, 2008

 
|   | /s/ Thomas F. Wolfe       |   |
|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|   | Thomas F. Wolfe           |
|   | Senior Vice President and |
|   | Chief Financial Officer   |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,or such other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thewritten statement as required by Section 906, has been provided toAffinity Group Holding, Inc. and will be retained by Affinity GroupHolding, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

 

----
EX-4.81



 Exhibit 4.81 
 [Translation of Chinese Original] 
 Second Supplementary Agreement to the Loan
Agreement 
 This Second Supplementary Agreement to the Loan Agreement (“this Agreement”) is entered into in Beijing as of
April 12, 2013 by and between: 
  

	(1)	Beijing Super TV Co., Ltd., with its registered address at 4-406 Jingmeng High-Tech Building B, No. 5-2 Shangdi East Road, Haidian District, Beijing (the
“Lender”); and 

  

	(2)	Tianxing Wang, with his address at 5-401, Building No. 4, Quarter No. 2, No. 8 Yuhui North Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing (the “Borrower”).


 The Lender and the Borrower are hereinafter referred to as a “Party” respectively and together as the
“Parties”. 
 WHEREAS: 
 1.
The Parties entered into the Loan Agreement (the “Original Agreement”) on July 11, 2011, and entered into the Supplementary Agreement to the Loan Agreement on January 16, 2012 together with Shizhou Shen, Lei Zhang
and Wenjun Wang. 
 2. Pursuant to Section 1.1 of the Original Agreement, the Lender agreed to provide to the Borrower a loan in an amount
of RMB46,855,328, while the actual amount of loan provided by the Lender to the Borrower was RMB38,590,728. 
 NOW, THEREFOR, through
consultation, the Parties agree to amend the Original Agreement as follows: 
  

	1.	Section 1.1 of the Original Agreement 

 “The Lender agrees to provide to the Borrower a loan of RMB46,855,328 (of which RMB38,590,728 is to be used for subscribing the increase of registered capital of Beijing Novel-Super Digital TV
Technology Co., Ltd. in 2011, and RMB8,264,600 is to be used by the Borrower to substitute Junming Wu, a former shareholder of Beijing Novel-Super Digital TV Technology Co., Ltd., for the loan therebetween.). The term of the loan is 10 years, and
may be extended upon agreement by the Parties.” 







 shall be amended and replaced with the following: 

“The Lender agrees to provide to the Borrower a loan of RMB38,590,728. The term of the loan is 10 years and shall be extended
automatically for another 10 years upon its termination date, unless the Lender has provided a written notice for the termination of the loan one month prior to such termination date. The Lender may terminate this Agreement by written notice at any
time during the term of the loan.” 
  

	2.	Other unmodified matters shall be based on the Original Agreement. 

  

	3.	This Agreement shall take effect on the date when the Parties sign or seal this Agreement. This Agreement is executed in four counterparts, which shall have the same
force and effect. 


  
 -2-









 [This page is intentionally left blank and is the signature page to this second supplemental agreement.]

 The Lender: Beijing Super TV Co., Ltd. 
 (Seal) 
 Authorized Representative: /s/ Jianhua Zhu 

The Borrower: Tianxing Wang 
 Signature: /s/
Tianxing Wang 

  
 -3-