Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 224 / Monday, November 22, 2010 / Notices 71145 

Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6 and 1506.10. 

Robert V. Abbey, 

Director, Bureau of Land Management. 

[FR Doc. 2010–29370 Filed 11–19–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–HC–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Reclamation 

San Joaquin River Restoration 

Program: Reach 4B, Eastside Bypass, 

and Mariposa Bypass Channel and 

Structural Improvements Project, 

Merced County, CA 

AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Revised notice of intent to 

prepare an Environmental Impact 

Statement/Environmental Report (EIS/ 

EIR) and Notice of Scoping Meeting. 

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Reclamation 

and the California Department of Water 

Resources are revising our proposal to 

prepare a joint EIS/EIR on the effects of 

the proposed Reach 4B, Eastside Bypass, 

and Mariposa Bypass Channel and 

Structural Improvements Project under 

the San Joaquin River Restoration 

Program. The original notice of intent 

was published in the Federal Register 

on September 9, 2009 (74 FR 46453). 

This revised proposal would include 

measures for the conveyance of Interim 

and Restoration flows and incorporation 

of fish habitat through Reach 4B and/or 

the bypasses. When evaluating 

comments on this proposal, we will also 

consider comments that we received on 

the previous proposal. 

DATES: Submit written comments on the 

scope of the EIS/EIR by December 22, 

2010. We will hold a scoping meeting 

on Monday, December 6, 2010, from 

6:30 to 8 p.m. in Los Banos, California. 

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to 

Ms. Michelle Banonis, Natural 

Resources Specialist, Bureau of 

Reclamation, 2800 Cottage Way, MP– 

170, Sacramento, CA 95825 or via email at reach4b@restoresjr.net. We will 

hold a public scoping meeting at the 

Miller and Lux Building, 830 6th Street, 

Los Banos, California. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Margaret Gidding, Outreach 

Coordinator, 2800 Cottage Way, MP– 

170, Sacramento, CA 95825, or via email at mgidding@usbr.gov, by 

telephone at 916–978–5461, TDD 916– 

978–5608 or via fax at 916–978–5469. 

Additional information is available 

online at http://www.restoresjr.net. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Proposed Action includes improving 

conveyance capacity in the San Joaquin 

River from the Reach 4B headgates near 

Washington Road to the confluence of 

the Mariposa Bypass with the San 

Joaquin River (generally referred to as 

Reach 4B1). The improvements will 

incorporate modifications to Reach 4B 

and the Eastside and Mariposa bypass 

channels to allow for conveyance of 

Interim and Restoration flows. 

Improvements will also include the 

incorporation of fish habitat in Reach 4B 

and/or the bypasses and maintain the 

current flood operations and 

conveyance capacity of the system. 

Additionally, the Proposed Action may 

result in an opportunity for 

improvements to the existing flood 

system. These improvements are 

intended to support paragraph 11 

Settlement actions related to Reach 4B, 

the Eastside Bypass, and the Mariposa 

Bypass. The planning and 

environmental review for the Proposed 

Action is authorized under Section 

3406(c)(1) of the Central Valley Project 

Improvement Act and the San Joaquin 

River Restoration Settlement (SJRRS) 

Act. Construction of the Proposed 

Action is authorized under Section 

10004 of the SJRRS Act. The Proposed 

Action would be implemented 

consistent with the Settlement and the 

SJRRS Act. 

San Joaquin River Restoration Program 

In 1988, a coalition of environmental 

groups led by the Natural Resources 

Defense Council (NRDC) filed a lawsuit 

challenging the renewal of the long-term 

water service contracts between the 

United States and the Central Valley 

Project Friant Division Contractors. 

After more than 18 years of litigation 

known as NRDC, et al., v. Kirk Rodgers, 

et al., the NRDC, Friant Water Users 

Authority, and the Departments of the 

Interior and Commerce (Settling Parties) 

reached agreement on the terms and 

conditions of the San Joaquin River 

Stipulation of Settlement (Settlement) 

that was subsequently approved by the 

Court on October 23, 2006. The 

Settlement can be found online at 

http://www.restoresjr.net. 

The Settlement is based on two 

parallel Goals: 

• The Restoration Goal—To restore 

and maintain fish populations in ‘‘good 

condition’’ in the main stem of the San 

Joaquin River below Friant Dam to the 

confluence of the Merced River, 

including naturally reproducing and 

self-sustaining populations of salmon 

and other fish; and 

• The Water Management Goal—To 

reduce or avoid adverse water supply 

impacts to all of the Friant Division 

long-term Contractors that may result 

from the Interim Flows and Restoration 

Flows provided for in the Settlement. 

The Settling Parties acknowledge that 

accomplishing the Goals requires 

planning, implementation, and funding 

of certain activities, such as 

environmental review, design, and 

construction. With regard to the 

Restoration Goal, the Settlement calls 

for a combination of channel and 

structural improvements along the San 

Joaquin River below Friant Dam, 

releases of additional water from Friant 

Dam to the confluence of the Merced 

River, and the reintroduction of spring 

and/or fall-run Chinook salmon. 

The Settlement states that the 

Secretary of the Interior shall diligently 

pursue completion of the improvements 

listed in Paragraph 11 in coordination 

with the Restoration Administrator and 

with other federal, state, and local 

agencies. Additionally, the Settling 

Parties agreed that implementation of 

the Settlement shall also require 

participation of the State of California. 

Therefore, concurrent with the 

execution of the Settlement, the Settling 

Parties entered into a Memorandum of 

Understanding with the State of 

California, by and through the California 

Resources Agency, DWR, the 

Department of Fish and Game (DFG), 

and the California Environmental 

Protection Agency, regarding the State’s 

role in the implementation of the 

Settlement. The program established to 

implement the Settlement is the SJRRP, 

and the ‘‘Implementing Agencies’’ 

responsible for the management of the 

SJRRP include Reclamation, the U.S. 

Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the 

National Marine Fisheries Service 

(NMFS), DWR, and DFG. The Federal 

Implementing Agencies (Reclamation, 

USFWS, and NMFS) are authorized to 

implement the Settlement under the 

SJRRS Act included in Public Law 111– 

11. 

A Program Environmental Impact 

Statement/Environmental Impact Report 

(PEIS/EIR) is currently being developed 

for implementation of the SJRRP. If 

applicable, the EIS/EIR for the Proposed 

Action will supplement, tier from, 

incorporate by reference, or adopt 

relevant NEPA analyses from the PEIS/ 

EIR once a Record of Decision is signed. 

Special Assistance for Public Meetings 

If special assistance is required to 

participate in the scoping meeting, 

please contact Ms. Margaret Gidding at 

916–978–5461, by TDD 916–978–5608, 

or via e-mail at mgidding@usbr.gov. 

Please contact Ms. Gidding at least ten 

working days prior to the meeting. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
71146 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 224 / Monday, November 22, 2010 / Notices 

1The record is defined in Sec. 207.2(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 

CFR 207.2(f)). 

2Chairman Deanna Tanner Okun, Vice Chairman 

Irving A. Williamson, Commissioner Daniel R. 

Pearson, and Commissioner Shara L. Aranoff 

determine that they would not have found material 

injury but for the suspension of liquidation. 

3Commissioner Charlotte R. Lane determines that 

the domestic SRC pipe and tube industry is 

materially injured by reason of imports of the 

subject merchandise from China and Mexico. 

4Commissioner Dean A. Pinkert did not 

participate in these investigations. 

Public Disclosure 

Before including your name, address, 

phone number, e-mail address, or other 

personal identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—may 

be publicly available at any time. While 

you can ask us in your comment to 

withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

Dated: October 6, 2010. 

Anastasia T. Leigh, 

Acting Regional Environmental Officer, MidPacific Region. 

[FR Doc. 2010–29330 Filed 11–19–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–MN–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1174–1175 

(Final)] 

Seamless Refined Copper Pipe and 

Tube From China and Mexico 

Determinations 

On the basis of the record 1 developed 

in the subject investigations, the United 

States International Trade Commission 

(‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant to 

section 735(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 

(19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)) (the Act), that an 

industry in the United States is 

threatened with material injury 234 by 

reason of imports of seamless refined 

copper pipe and tube (‘‘SRC pipe and 

tube’’) from China and Mexico provided 

for in subheadings 7411.10.10 and 

8415.90.80 of the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States, that have 

been found by the Department of 

Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) to be sold in 

the United States at less than fair value 

(‘‘LTFV’’). 

Background 

The Commission instituted these 

investigations effective on September 

30, 2009, following receipt of a petition 

filed with the Commission and 

Commerce by Cerro Flow Products, Inc., 

St. Louis, MO; Kobe Wieland Copper 

Products, LLC, Pine Hall, NC; Mueller 

Copper Tube Products, Inc. and Mueller 

Copper Tube Company, Inc., Memphis, 

TN. The final phase of these 

investigations was scheduled by the 

Commission following notification of 

preliminary determinations by 

Commerce that imports of SRC pipe and 

tube from China and Mexico were being 

sold at LTFV within the meaning of 

section 733(b) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 

1673b(b)). Notice of the scheduling of 

the final phase of the Commission’s 

investigations and of a public hearing to 

be held in connection therewith was 

given by posting copies of the notice in 

the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 

Washington, DC, and by publishing the 

notice in the Federal Register of June 

11, 2010 (75 FR 33330). The hearing was 

held in Washington, DC, on September 

23, 2010, and all persons who requested 

the opportunity were permitted to 

appear in person or by counsel. 

The Commission transmitted its 

determinations in these investigation to 

the Secretary of Commerce on 

November 15, 2010. The views of the 

Commission are contained in USITC 

Publication 4193 (November 2010), 

entitled Seamless Refined Copper Pipe 

and Tube from China and Mexico: 

Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1174–1175 

(Final). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: November 15, 2010. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–29301 Filed 11–19–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–680] 

In the Matter of Certain Machine Vision 

Software, Machine Vision Systems, 

and Products Containing Same; Notice 

of Commission Decision To Modify a 

Final Initial Determination and To 

Terminate the Investigation With a 

Finding of No Violation of Section 337 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined to modify 

a final initial determination (‘‘ID’’) of the 

presiding administrative law judge 

(‘‘ALJ’’). The Commission has 

determined that there is no violation of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 

U.S.C. 1337) in the above-captioned 

investigation. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–2310. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// 

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on July 16, 2009 based on a complaint 

filed on May 28, 2009, by Cognex 

Corporation of Natick, Massachusetts 

and Cognex Technology & Investment 

Corporation of Mountain View, 

California (collectively ‘‘complainants’’). 

74 FR 34589–90 (July 16, 2009). The 

complaint alleged violations of section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, and the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain machine vision software, 

machine vision systems, or products 

containing same by reason of 

infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent Nos. 7,016,539 (‘‘the ’539 patent); 

7,065,262 (‘‘the ’262 patent’’); and 

6,959,112 (‘‘the ’112 patent’’). The 

complaint further alleged that an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by subsection (a)(2) of section 

337. 

The complaint named numerous 

respondents including the following: 

Multitest Elektronische Systems GmbH 

of Germany and Multitest Electronic 

Systems, Inc. of Santa Clara, California 

(collectively, ‘‘Multitest respondents’’); 

Yxlon International GmbH of Germany 

and Yxlon International, Inc. of 

Mogadore, Ohio (collectively, ‘‘Yxlon 

respondents’’); Amistar Automation, Inc. 

(‘‘Amistar’’) of San Marcos, California; 

Techno Soft Systemnics, Inc. (‘‘Techno 

Soft’’) of Japan; Fuji Machine 

Manufacturing Co., Ltd. of Japan and 

Fuji America Corporation of Vernon 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES