70686 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 222 / Thursday, November 18, 2010 / Notices 

directed by a resolution? The NIGC 

recognizes the many differences in 

Tribal government structures. However, 

would a universal standard for 

communication that can then be 

modified by each Tribe if they so choose 

promote more effective regulatory 

communication? 

The Commission is seeking comment 

on whether the Commission should 

consider a regulation on this issue, how 

the Commission should prioritize it in 

the regulatory review process, and 

whether the Commission should utilize 

standard notice and comment 

rulemaking, a Tribal Advisory 

Committee to assist in its regulatory 

review of this part, or another process. 

Further, the NIGC invites comment on 

whether to define the types of 

communication that occur between the 

NIGC and the Tribe and Tribal agencies. 

For example, a letter from the 

Chairperson regarding upcoming Tribal 

consultations, proposed broad policy 

changes or Notice of Violation could be 

considered a form of ‘‘formal 

communication.’’ Additionally, a letter 

from a Tribal chairperson requesting a 

meeting or a request from the Tribe for 

the NIGC to perform an audit could also 

be ‘‘formal communication.’’ However, 

the NIGC understands that 

communications between the NIGC and 

the Tribe, TGC, and TGRA may not be 

occurring in a uniform manner and 

wants to provide clarity for all the 

parties. The NIGC welcomes any 

comment or suggestions regarding 

whether the clarification is needed and 

if it should be formalized into a 

regulation or policy. 

D. Buy Indian Act Regulation 

The Commission is considering 

adopting a regulation which would 

require the NIGC to give preference to 

qualified Indian-owned businesses 

when purchasing goods or services as 

defined by the ‘‘Buy Indian Act,’’ 25 

U.S.C. 47. As an agency with regulatory 

responsibilities wholly related to Tribes, 

the Commission seeks comment on 

whether it is appropriate to promulgate 

such a regulation. The Commission is 

seeking advice and input from the 

Tribal gaming industry about this issue, 

and whether a Tribal Advisory 

Committee should be formed to make 

the change or if another process will be 

sufficient. 

VI. Other Regulations 

A. Part 501—Purpose and Scope 

The NIGC does not believe this 

regulation is currently in need of 

revision. However, we are interested in 

hearing any comments or suggestions 

related to possible revisions to this part. 

B. Part 503—Commission Information 

Collection Requirements Under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act: OMB Control 

Numbers and Expiration Dates 

The NIGC does not believe this 

regulation is currently in need of 

revision. However, we are interested in 

hearing any comments or suggestions 

related to possible revisions to this part. 

C. Part 513—Debt Collection 

The NIGC does not believe this 

regulation is currently in need of 

revision. However, we are interested in 

hearing any comments or suggestions 

related to possible revisions to this part. 

D. Part 515—Privacy Act Procedures 

The NIGC does not believe this 

regulation is currently in need of 

revision. However, we are interested in 

hearing any comments or suggestions 

related to possible revisions to this part. 

E. Part 517—Freedom of Information 

Act Procedures 

The NIGC does not believe this 

regulation is currently in need of 

revision. However, we are interested in 

hearing any comments or suggestions 

related to possible revisions to this part. 

F. Part 522—Submission of Gaming 

Ordinance or Resolution 

The NIGC does not believe these 

regulations are currently in need of 

revision. However, we are interested in 

hearing any comments or suggestions 

related to possible revisions to this part. 

G. Part 531—Content of Management 

Contacts 

The NIGC does not believe this 

regulation is currently in need of 

revision. However, we are interested in 

hearing any comments or suggestions 

related to possible revisions to this part. 

H. Part 535—Post Approval Procedures 

The NIGC does not believe this 

regulation is currently in need of 

revision. However, we are interested in 

hearing any comments or suggestions 

related to possible revisions to this part. 

I. Sections 571.8–571.11—Subpoenas 

and Depositions 

The NIGC does not believe these 

regulations are currently in need of 

revision. However, we are interested in 

hearing any comments or suggestions 

related to possible revisions to these 

sections. 

J. Sections 571.12–571.14—Annual 

Audits 

The NIGC does not believe these 

regulations are currently in need of 

revision. However, we are interested in 

hearing any comments or suggestions 

related to possible revisions to these 

sections. 

K. Part 575—Civil Fines 

The NIGC does not believe these 

regulations are currently in need of 

revision. While the Commission was 

interested in seeing Tribal dollars paid 

as a fine for a regulation violation 

returned to the Tribes by funding the 

Commission activities, Federal law 

prohibits an agency from keeping fines 

received from entities it regulates, and 

fines are deposited in the U.S. Treasury. 

The view is that regulatory agencies 

would then have an incentive to issue 

violations. However, we are interested 

in hearing any comments or suggestions 

related to possible revisions to this part. 

Dated: November 12, 2010. 

Tracie L. Stevens, 

Chairwoman. 

Steffani A. Cochran, 

Vice-Chairwoman. 

Daniel J. Little, 

Associate Commissioner. 

[FR Doc. 2010–29028 Filed 11–17–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7565–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Filing of Settlement 

Agreement Pursuant to 

Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation, and Liability 

Act (‘‘CERCLA’’) 

Notice is hereby given that on 

November 10, 2010, a proposed 

Settlement Agreement in In re Asarco, 

LLC, No. 05–21207 (Bankr. S.D. Tex.) 

was filed with the United States 

Bankruptcy Court for the Southern 

District of Texas. The Settlement 

Agreement resolves the Late 

Supplemental Proof of Claim by the 

United States on behalf of the United 

States Environmental Protection Agency 

and the United States Department of 

Agriculture, Forest Service, in the 

Asarco bankruptcy. The Late 

Supplemental Proof of Claim relates to 

the Blue Ledge Mine Site located in 

Siskiyou County, California, which lies 

three miles south of the Oregon border. 

The Settlement Agreement requires a 

payment of $2,400,000 to settle this 

matter. 

The Department of Justice will receive 

for a period of fifteen (15) days from the 

date of this publication comments 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 222 / Thursday, November 18, 2010 / Notices 70687 

relating to the Settlement Agreement. 

Comments should be addressed to the 

Assistant Attorney General, 

Environment and Natural Resources 

Division, and either e-mailed to 

pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov or 

mailed to P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611, and should refer to In re 

Asarco, LLC, No. 05–21207 (Bankr. S.D. 

Tex.), Department of Justice Case 

Number 90–11–3–08633. 

During the public comment period, 

the Settlement Agreement may be 

examined at the Office of the United 

States Attorney, Southern District of 

Texas, 800 North Shoreline Blvd, #500, 

Corpus Christi, TX 78476–2001. The 

Settlement Agreement may also be 

examined on the following Department 

of Justice Web site, http:// 

www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ 

Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the 

Settlement Agreement may also be 

obtained by mail from the Consent 

Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611 or by faxing or e-mailing a 

request to Tonia Fleetwood 

(tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), fax no. 

(202) 514–0097, phone confirmation 

number (202) 514–1547. In requesting a 

copy from the Consent Decree Library, 

please enclose a check in the amount of 

$2.75 (25 cents per page reproduction 

cost) payable to the U.S. Treasury. 

Maureen Katz, 

Assistant Section Chief. 

[FR Doc. 2010–29073 Filed 11–17–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Occupational Safety and Health 

Administration 

[Docket No. OSHA–2010–0050] 

Storage and Handling of Anhydrous 

Ammonia Standard; Extension of the 

Office of Management and Budget’s 

(OMB) Approval of Information 

Collection (Paperwork) Requirements 

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health 

Administration (OSHA), Labor. 

ACTION: Request for public comments. 

SUMMARY: OSHA solicits public 

comments concerning its proposal to 

extend OMB approval of the 

information collection requirements 

specified in the Storage and Handling of 

Anhydrous Ammonia Standard (29 CFR 

1910.111). Paragraphs (b)(3) and (b)(4) 

of the Standard have paperwork 

requirements that apply to 

nonrefrigerated containers and systems 

and to refrigerated containers, 

respectively; employers use these 

containers and systems to store and 

transfer anhydrous ammonia in the 

workplace. 

DATES: Comments must be submitted 

(postmarked, sent, or received) by 

January 18, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: Electronically: You may 

submit comments and attachments 

electronically at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, which is the 

Federal eRulemaking Portal. Follow the 

instructions online for submitting 

comments. 

Facsimile: If your comments, 

including attachments, are not longer 

than 10 pages, you may fax them to the 

OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693–1648. 

Mail, hand delivery, express mail, 

messenger, or courier service: When 

using this method, you must submit a 

copy of your comments and attachments 

to the OSHA Docket Office, Docket No. 

OSHA–2010–0050, U.S. Department of 

Labor, Room N–2625, 200 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210. 

Deliveries (hand, express mail, 

messenger, and courier service) are 

accepted during the Department of 

Labor’s and Docket Office’s normal 

business hours, 8:15 a.m. to 4:45 p.m., 

e.t. 

Instructions: All submissions must 

include the Agency name and OSHA 

docket number for the Information 

Collection Request (OSHA–2010–0050). 

All comments, including any personal 

information you provide, are placed in 

the public docket without change, and 

may be made available online at http:// 

www.regulations.gov. For further 

information on submitting comments 

see the ‘‘Public Participation’’ heading in 

the section of this notice titled 

‘‘SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.’’ 

Docket: To read or download 

comments or other material in the 

docket, go to http:// 

www.regulations.gov or the OSHA 

Docket Office at the address above. All 

documents in the docket (including this 

Federal Register notice) are listed in the 

http://www.regulations.gov index; 

however, some information (e.g., 

copyrighted material) is not publicly 

available to read or download through 

the Web site. All submissions, including 

copyrighted material, are available for 

inspection and copying at the OSHA 

Docket Office. You also may contact 

Theda Kenney at the address below to 

obtain a copy of the ICR. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Theda Kenney or Todd Owen, 

Directorate of Standards and Guidance, 

OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor, Room 

N–3609, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20210; telephone (202) 

693–2222. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

The Department of Labor, as part of its 

continuing effort to reduce paperwork 

and respondent (i.e., employer) burden, 

conducts a preclearance consultation 

program to provide the public with an 

opportunity to comment on proposed 

and continuing information collection 

requirements in accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This program 

ensures that information is in the 

desired format, reporting burden (time 

and costs) is minimal, collection 

instruments are clearly understood, and 

OSHA’s estimate of the information 

collection burden is accurate. The 

Occupational Safety and Health Act of 

1970 (the OSH Act) (29 U.S.C. 651 et 

seq.) authorizes information collection 

by employers as necessary or 

appropriate for enforcement of the Act 

or for developing information regarding 

the causes and prevention of 

occupational injuries, illnesses, and 

accidents (29 U.S.C. 657). The OSH Act 

also requires that OSHA obtain such 

information with minimum burden 

upon employers, especially those 

operating small businesses, and to 

reduce to the maximum extent feasible 

unnecessary duplication of efforts in 

obtaining information (29 U.S.C. 657). 

Paragraph (b)(3) of the Standard 

specifies that systems have nameplates 

if required, and that these nameplates 

‘‘be permanently attached to the system 

(as specified by paragraph (b)(3)(ii)(j)) so 

as to be readily accessible for inspection 

* * * ’’ In addition, this paragraph 

requires that markings on containers 

and systems covered by paragraphs (c) 

(‘‘Systems utilizing stationary, 

nonrefrigerated storage containers’’), (f) 

(‘‘Tank motor vehicles for the 

transportation of ammonia’’), (g) 

(‘‘Systems mounted on farm vehicles 

other than for the application of 

ammonia’’), and (h) (‘‘Systems mounted 

on farm vehicles for the application of 

ammonia’’) provide information 

regarding nine specific characteristics of 

the containers and systems. Similarly, 

paragraph (b)(4) of the Standard 

specifies that refrigerated containers be 

marked with a nameplate on the outer 

covering in an accessible place which 

provides information regarding eight 

specific characteristics of the container. 

The required markings ensure that 

employers use only properly designed 

and tested containers and systems to 

store anhydrous ammonia, thereby, 

preventing accidental release of, and 

exposure of workers to, this highly toxic 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES