# L_2020415EN.01000301.xml

| 10.12.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 415/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.12.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 415/3

---

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) 2020/2013

of 21 August 2020

amending Regulation (EU) 2019/1241 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards technical measures for certain demersal and pelagic fisheries in the North Sea and in the South Western Waters

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) 2019/1241 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on the conservation of fisheries resources and the protection of marine ecosystems through technical measures, amending Council Regulations (EC) No 1967/2006, (EC) No 1224/2009 and Regulations (EU) No 1380/2013, (EU) 2016/1139, (EU) 2018/973, (EU) 2019/472 and (EU) 2019/1022 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Council Regulations (EC) No 894/97, (EC) No 850/98, (EC) No 2549/2000, (EC) No 254/2002, (EC) No 812/2004 and (EC) No 2187/2005 (1), and in particular Articles 2(2), 10(4) and 15(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 14 August 2019 a new Regulation (EU) 2019/1241 on the conservation measures of fisheries resources and the protection of marine ecosystems through technical measures entered into force. It establishes in Annex I a list of prohibited species, in Annex V specific provisions regarding technical measures established at regional level for the North Sea and in Annex VII specific provisions regarding technical measures established at regional level for the South Western Waters. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 14 August 2019 a new Regulation (EU) 2019/1241 on the conservation measures of fisheries resources and the protection of marine ecosystems through technical measures entered into force. It establishes in Annex I a list of prohibited species, in Annex V specific provisions regarding technical measures established at regional level for the North Sea and in Annex VII specific provisions regarding technical measures established at regional level for the South Western Waters.

| (2) | Article 2(2) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1241 empowers the Commission to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 15 and Article 29 to amend this Regulation by providing that the relevant provisions of Article 13 or parts A or C of Annexes V to X also apply to recreational fishing. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 2(2) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1241 empowers the Commission to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 15 and Article 29 to amend this Regulation by providing that the relevant provisions of Article 13 or parts A or C of Annexes V to X also apply to recreational fishing.

| (3) | Article 10(4) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1241 empowers the Commission to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 29 to amend the list of prohibited species, set out in Annex I. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Article 10(4) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1241 empowers the Commission to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 29 to amend the list of prohibited species, set out in Annex I.

| (4) | Article 15(2) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1241 empowers the Commission to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 29 of this Regulation and Article 18 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (2) to amend, supplement, repeal or derogate from the technical measures set out in the Annexes to Regulation (EU) 2019/1241, including when implementing the landing obligation. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Article 15(2) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1241 empowers the Commission to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 29 of this Regulation and Article 18 of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (2) to amend, supplement, repeal or derogate from the technical measures set out in the Annexes to Regulation (EU) 2019/1241, including when implementing the landing obligation.

| (5) | Annex I sets out the list of prohibited species. Annex V and Annex VII of Regulation (EU) 2019/1241 set out specific technical measures for the North Sea and for the South Western Waters, respectively. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

Annex I sets out the list of prohibited species. Annex V and Annex VII of Regulation (EU) 2019/1241 set out specific technical measures for the North Sea and for the South Western Waters, respectively.

| (6) | Belgium, Denmark, Germany, France, the Netherlands and Sweden have a direct fisheries management interest in the North Sea. After consulting the North Sea Advisory Council and the Pelagic Advisory Council, those Member States submitted on 4 May 2020 a joint recommendation to the Commission for a delegated act. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

Belgium, Denmark, Germany, France, the Netherlands and Sweden have a direct fisheries management interest in the North Sea. After consulting the North Sea Advisory Council and the Pelagic Advisory Council, those Member States submitted on 4 May 2020 a joint recommendation to the Commission for a delegated act.

| (7) | Belgium, Spain, France, the Netherlands and Portugal have a direct fisheries management interest in the South Western Waters. After consulting the South Western Waters Advisory Council and the Pelagic Advisory Council, those Member States submitted on 4 May 2020 a joint recommendation to the Commission for a delegated act. |
| --- | --- |

(7)

Belgium, Spain, France, the Netherlands and Portugal have a direct fisheries management interest in the South Western Waters. After consulting the South Western Waters Advisory Council and the Pelagic Advisory Council, those Member States submitted on 4 May 2020 a joint recommendation to the Commission for a delegated act.

| (8) | This Regulation aims at incorporating into one single act existing provisions on technical measures that were in the past adopted as part of the discard plans for the North Sea and South-Western Waters, and newly proposed technical measures. |
| --- | --- |

(8)

This Regulation aims at incorporating into one single act existing provisions on technical measures that were in the past adopted as part of the discard plans for the North Sea and South-Western Waters, and newly proposed technical measures.

| (9) | Based on the information provided by the Member States, the Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF) positively assessed the evidence provided by the regional groups in support of the technical measures included in both joint recommendations (3). |
| --- | --- |

(9)

Based on the information provided by the Member States, the Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF) positively assessed the evidence provided by the regional groups in support of the technical measures included in both joint recommendations (3).

| (10) | The measures included in this Regulation have been evaluated in accordance with Article 2(2), 10, 15 and Article 18 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1241. Member States provided evidence to demonstrate that the proposals comply with Articles 15(4) and (5) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1241. |
| --- | --- |

(10)

The measures included in this Regulation have been evaluated in accordance with Article 2(2), 10, 15 and Article 18 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1241. Member States provided evidence to demonstrate that the proposals comply with Articles 15(4) and (5) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1241.

| (11) | The Fisheries Expert Group was consulted on the joint recommendation on 28 July 2020. The European Parliament attended the meeting as an observer. |
| --- | --- |

(11)

The Fisheries Expert Group was consulted on the joint recommendation on 28 July 2020. The European Parliament attended the meeting as an observer.

| (12) | The joint recommendation submitted by the Member States with an interest in the North Sea (NS joint recommendation) suggested to include berried lobster in the list of species in Annex I of Regulation (EU) 2019/1241 for which there is a prohibition to fish for, retain on board, tranship, land, store, sell, display or offer for sale. The STECF analysed the evidence presented by the Member States and concluded that there is compelling evidence to support the introduction of this measure. The STECF noted that similar measures have been taken in other areas and have produced long-term economic benefits from increased landings of lobster due to stock recovery. The proposed measure should therefore be included in this Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(12)

The joint recommendation submitted by the Member States with an interest in the North Sea (NS joint recommendation) suggested to include berried lobster in the list of species in Annex I of Regulation (EU) 2019/1241 for which there is a prohibition to fish for, retain on board, tranship, land, store, sell, display or offer for sale. The STECF analysed the evidence presented by the Member States and concluded that there is compelling evidence to support the introduction of this measure. The STECF noted that similar measures have been taken in other areas and have produced long-term economic benefits from increased landings of lobster due to stock recovery. The proposed measure should therefore be included in this Regulation.

| (13) | The NS joint recommendation suggested increasing the minimum conservation reference size for European lobster in the Swedish exclusive economic zone (EEZ) in ICES division 3a. The STECF pointed out that despite no specific evidence for this request, the measure represents an increase of the minimum conservation reference size. With such a measure, the stock will be exploited at a lower intensity, with obvious subsequent benefits for the conservation of the stock. The proposed measure should therefore be included in this Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(13)

The NS joint recommendation suggested increasing the minimum conservation reference size for European lobster in the Swedish exclusive economic zone (EEZ) in ICES division 3a. The STECF pointed out that despite no specific evidence for this request, the measure represents an increase of the minimum conservation reference size. With such a measure, the stock will be exploited at a lower intensity, with obvious subsequent benefits for the conservation of the stock. The proposed measure should therefore be included in this Regulation.

| (14) | The NS joint recommendation also suggested to harmonise the minimum conservation reference size for seabass caught in recreational fisheries in ICES division 3a and ICES subarea 4 with the minimum conservation reference size of seabass for commercial fisheries, as included in Article 10, paragraph 5 of Council Regulation (EU) 2020/123 (4). The STECF noted in its report 20-04 that given recreational fisheries contributes to the overall fishing mortality, applying the minimum conservation reference size for commercial fisheries also to recreational fisheries is a positive management measure. The proposed measure should therefore be included in this Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(14)

The NS joint recommendation also suggested to harmonise the minimum conservation reference size for seabass caught in recreational fisheries in ICES division 3a and ICES subarea 4 with the minimum conservation reference size of seabass for commercial fisheries, as included in Article 10, paragraph 5 of Council Regulation (EU) 2020/123 (4). The STECF noted in its report 20-04 that given recreational fisheries contributes to the overall fishing mortality, applying the minimum conservation reference size for commercial fisheries also to recreational fisheries is a positive management measure. The proposed measure should therefore be included in this Regulation.

| (15) | The NS joint recommendation further suggested the continuation of a number of additional technical measures agreed between the Union and Norway in 2011 (5) and 2012 (6). Certain of these specific technical measures were already included in Annex V of Regulation (EU) 2019/1241, others were included pursuant to Article 15(5)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 for the years 2019-2021 in Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/2238 (7). These measures aim at increasing selectivity and reduce unwanted catches for fisheries or species covered by the landing obligation and should be incorporated into Annex V of Regulation (EU) 2019/1241. These measures should therefore be included in this Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(15)

The NS joint recommendation further suggested the continuation of a number of additional technical measures agreed between the Union and Norway in 2011 (5) and 2012 (6). Certain of these specific technical measures were already included in Annex V of Regulation (EU) 2019/1241, others were included pursuant to Article 15(5)(a) of Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 for the years 2019-2021 in Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/2238 (7). These measures aim at increasing selectivity and reduce unwanted catches for fisheries or species covered by the landing obligation and should be incorporated into Annex V of Regulation (EU) 2019/1241. These measures should therefore be included in this Regulation.

| (16) | The NS joint recommendation suggested also continuation of the use of SepNep nets permitted by Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/2238. The STECF concluded that the information presented was detailed and credible and supporting evidence of the effectiveness of the SepNep was provided. The device was analysed by STECF in previous years and its conclusion remains valid (8). On the basis of the provided information STECF also concluded that the SepNep complies with Article 15(5) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1241 as an equivalent selectivity device in the context of the technical provisions set out for Nephrops directed fisheries and will not lead to deterioration of selectivity standards. The measure should therefore be included in this Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(16)

The NS joint recommendation suggested also continuation of the use of SepNep nets permitted by Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/2238. The STECF concluded that the information presented was detailed and credible and supporting evidence of the effectiveness of the SepNep was provided. The device was analysed by STECF in previous years and its conclusion remains valid (8). On the basis of the provided information STECF also concluded that the SepNep complies with Article 15(5) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1241 as an equivalent selectivity device in the context of the technical provisions set out for Nephrops directed fisheries and will not lead to deterioration of selectivity standards. The measure should therefore be included in this Regulation.

| (17) | The NS joint recommendation also suggested a seasonal closure for commercial and recreational fishery for European lobster in the Swedish exclusive economic zone (EEZ) in ICES division 3a. The STECF analysed the evidence provided by the Member States and noted that, although no specific supporting information was provided allowing to quantify its potential benefit, the measure will represent a reduction in fishing mortality that is likely to have positive benefits on lobster stocks in combination with the other measures proposed. The proposed measure should therefore be included in this Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(17)

The NS joint recommendation also suggested a seasonal closure for commercial and recreational fishery for European lobster in the Swedish exclusive economic zone (EEZ) in ICES division 3a. The STECF analysed the evidence provided by the Member States and noted that, although no specific supporting information was provided allowing to quantify its potential benefit, the measure will represent a reduction in fishing mortality that is likely to have positive benefits on lobster stocks in combination with the other measures proposed. The proposed measure should therefore be included in this Regulation.

| (18) | The NS joint recommendation suggested a prohibition to fish lobster with gears other than lobster pots in the Swedish exclusive economic zone (EEZ) in ICES division 3a. STECF concluded that, although no specific supporting information was provided allowing to quantify its potential benefit, banning the use of gillnets for targeting lobster and crawfish has had positive effects in other areas and that the measure is likely to have positive benefits on lobster stocks. This measure should therefore be included in this Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(18)

The NS joint recommendation suggested a prohibition to fish lobster with gears other than lobster pots in the Swedish exclusive economic zone (EEZ) in ICES division 3a. STECF concluded that, although no specific supporting information was provided allowing to quantify its potential benefit, banning the use of gillnets for targeting lobster and crawfish has had positive effects in other areas and that the measure is likely to have positive benefits on lobster stocks. This measure should therefore be included in this Regulation.

| (19) | The joint recommendation submitted by the Member States with an interest in the South Western Waters (SWW joint recommendation) suggested maintaining the minimum conservation reference size of the horse mackerel caught by a small artisanal fishery in Xávega region in ICES division 8c and subarea 9 that is currently included in Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1394/2014 (9). The STECF referred to its previous assessment where it assessed this measure positively and concluded (10) that, with the conditions laid down in the joint recommendation, the proposal was not likely to change the historical exploitation pattern of the stock. Given that the conditions of this request have not changed and that the STECF noted that the exploitation pattern has been stable for at least 20 years, this measure should therefore be included in this Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(19)

The joint recommendation submitted by the Member States with an interest in the South Western Waters (SWW joint recommendation) suggested maintaining the minimum conservation reference size of the horse mackerel caught by a small artisanal fishery in Xávega region in ICES division 8c and subarea 9 that is currently included in Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1394/2014 (9). The STECF referred to its previous assessment where it assessed this measure positively and concluded (10) that, with the conditions laid down in the joint recommendation, the proposal was not likely to change the historical exploitation pattern of the stock. Given that the conditions of this request have not changed and that the STECF noted that the exploitation pattern has been stable for at least 20 years, this measure should therefore be included in this Regulation.

| (20) | The SWW joint recommendation suggested to harmonise the minimum conservation reference size for the following species caught in recreational fisheries in the South Western Waters with the minimum conservation reference size applicable to commercial fisheries: haddock, saithe, pollack, hake, megrim, sole, plaice, whiting, ling, blue ling, mackerel, herring, horse mackerel, anchovy and sardine. The joint recommendation suggested higher minimum conservation reference sizes for cod, red seabream and seabass for recreational fisheries. The STECF analysed the evidence provided and concluded (11) that given recreational fisheries contributes to the overall fishing mortality, applying the minimum conservation reference size for commercial fisheries also to recreational fisheries is a positive management measure. This measure should therefore be included in this Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(20)

The SWW joint recommendation suggested to harmonise the minimum conservation reference size for the following species caught in recreational fisheries in the South Western Waters with the minimum conservation reference size applicable to commercial fisheries: haddock, saithe, pollack, hake, megrim, sole, plaice, whiting, ling, blue ling, mackerel, herring, horse mackerel, anchovy and sardine. The joint recommendation suggested higher minimum conservation reference sizes for cod, red seabream and seabass for recreational fisheries. The STECF analysed the evidence provided and concluded (11) that given recreational fisheries contributes to the overall fishing mortality, applying the minimum conservation reference size for commercial fisheries also to recreational fisheries is a positive management measure. This measure should therefore be included in this Regulation.

| (21) | In order to optimise exploitation patterns, increase gear selectivity and reduce unwanted catches it is therefore appropriate to adopt the technical measures submitted by the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

(21)

In order to optimise exploitation patterns, increase gear selectivity and reduce unwanted catches it is therefore appropriate to adopt the technical measures submitted by the Member States.

| (22) | As the measures provided for in this Regulation have a direct impact on the planning of the fishing season of Union vessels and on related economic activities, this Regulation should enter into force immediately after its publication. Given that certain technical measures adopted as part of discard plans expire at the end of 2020, this Regulation should apply from 1 January 2021, |
| --- | --- |

(22)

As the measures provided for in this Regulation have a direct impact on the planning of the fishing season of Union vessels and on related economic activities, this Regulation should enter into force immediately after its publication. Given that certain technical measures adopted as part of discard plans expire at the end of 2020, this Regulation should apply from 1 January 2021,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Regulation (EU) 2019/1241 is amended as follows:

| (1) | in Annex I, the following point is added:






  ‘(q) | berried female European lobster (Homarus gammarus) in ICES divisions 3a, 4a and 4b’; |
| --- | --- | --- |

(1)

in Annex I, the following point is added:

‘(q)

berried female European lobster (Homarus gammarus) in ICES divisions 3a, 4a and 4b’;

| (2) | Annex V is amended as follows:






  (a) | Part A is amended as follows:






  (i) | the following entry is added to the table:






  ‘European lobster (Homarus gammarus) | 90 mm (Carapace length) in the Swedish exclusive economic zone in ICES division 3a’ |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |

(2)

Annex V is amended as follows:

(a)

Part A is amended as follows:

(i)

the following entry is added to the table:

‘European lobster (Homarus gammarus)

90 mm (Carapace length) in the Swedish exclusive economic zone in ICES division 3a’

| (ii) | the following point is inserted below the table:






  — | ‘1. | The minimum conservation reference sizes specified in this Part for seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) in the North Sea and European lobster (Homarus gammarus) in Swedish exclusive economic zone in the Skagerrak and Kattegat (ICES division 3a) shall apply to recreational fisheries.’; |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

(ii)

the following point is inserted below the table:

—

‘1.

The minimum conservation reference sizes specified in this Part for seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) in the North Sea and European lobster (Homarus gammarus) in Swedish exclusive economic zone in the Skagerrak and Kattegat (ICES division 3a) shall apply to recreational fisheries.’;

| (b) | the following points are added in Part B:






  — | ‘1.3. | By way of derogation from the specifications in the table, a fish retention device may be used in Northern prawn fisheries in the Skagerrak (ICES division 3an) provided that there are adequate fishing opportunities to cover by-catch and that the retention device is:






  — | constructed with a top panel with a minimum mesh size of 120 mm square mesh; |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |

(b)

the following points are added in Part B:

—

‘1.3.

By way of derogation from the specifications in the table, a fish retention device may be used in Northern prawn fisheries in the Skagerrak (ICES division 3an) provided that there are adequate fishing opportunities to cover by-catch and that the retention device is:

—

constructed with a top panel with a minimum mesh size of 120 mm square mesh;

| — | at least 3 metres long; and |
| --- | --- |

—

at least 3 metres long; and

| — | at least as wide as the sorting grid. |
| --- | --- |

—

at least as wide as the sorting grid.

| — | 1.4. | The use of SepNep (**) as referred to in Annex I of this Regulation shall be permitted as an equivalent selectivity device in the directed fisheries for Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus). |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

1.4.

The use of SepNep (**) as referred to in Annex I of this Regulation shall be permitted as an equivalent selectivity device in the directed fisheries for Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus).

| — | is constructed within the mesh size range of 80 to 99 +≥ 100 mm, |
| --- | --- |

—

is constructed within the mesh size range of 80 to 99 +≥ 100 mm,

| — | is fitted with multiple cod-ends of mesh sizes ranging from at least 80 to 120 mm attached to a single extension piece, the uppermost cod-end being constructed with a mesh size of at least 120 mm and fitted with a separation panel with a maximum mesh size of 105 mm, and |
| --- | --- |

—

is fitted with multiple cod-ends of mesh sizes ranging from at least 80 to 120 mm attached to a single extension piece, the uppermost cod-end being constructed with a mesh size of at least 120 mm and fitted with a separation panel with a maximum mesh size of 105 mm, and

| — | may furthermore be fitted with an optional selection grid with a bar spacing of at least 17 mm provided it is constructed in such a way so as to allow the escape of small Norway lobster.’; |
| --- | --- |

—

may furthermore be fitted with an optional selection grid with a bar spacing of at least 17 mm provided it is constructed in such a way so as to allow the escape of small Norway lobster.’;

| (c) | the following point is added to Part C:






  ‘7. | Measures on European lobster in ICES division 3a |
| --- | --- | --- |

(c)

the following point is added to Part C:

‘7.

| 7.1. | In the Swedish exclusive economic zone of ICES division 3a, European lobster (Homarus gammarus) may only be fished with lobsterpots (FPO).
  The lobsterpot shall have at least two circular escape openings with a diameter of at least 60mm which are situated in the lower part of each compartment of the lobsterpot. Lobster accidentally caught with other fishing gear shall not be harmed and shall be promptly released back into the sea. |
| --- | --- |

7.1.

The lobsterpot shall have at least two circular escape openings with a diameter of at least 60mm which are situated in the lower part of each compartment of the lobsterpot. Lobster accidentally caught with other fishing gear shall not be harmed and shall be promptly released back into the sea.

| 7.2. | It shall be prohibited to fish for, retain on board, tranship and land European lobster (Homarus gammarus) in the Swedish exclusive economic zone of ICES division 3a:






  (a) | in commercial fisheries during the period 1 January to first Monday after 20 September; |
| --- | --- | --- |

7.2.

(a)

in commercial fisheries during the period 1 January to first Monday after 20 September;

| (b) | in recreational fisheries during the period 1 December to first Monday after 20 September. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

in recreational fisheries during the period 1 December to first Monday after 20 September.

When caught accidentally during these periods, specimens of European lobster shall not be harmed and shall be promptly released back into the sea.’;

| (3) | Part A of Annex VII is amended as follows:






  (a) | in footnote 7, the first sentence is replaced by the following:

  ‘The minimum conservation reference size for horse mackerel (Trachurus spp.) caught in ICES division 8c and ICES subarea 9 shall be 12 cm for 5 % of the respective quotas of Spain and Portugal in those areas. Within that limit of 5 %, in the xávega artisanal beach sein fishery in ICES division 9a, 1 % of the quota of Portugal may be caught with the size below 12 cm.’; |
| --- | --- | --- |

(3)

Part A of Annex VII is amended as follows:

(a)

in footnote 7, the first sentence is replaced by the following:

‘The minimum conservation reference size for horse mackerel (Trachurus spp.) caught in ICES division 8c and ICES subarea 9 shall be 12 cm for 5 % of the respective quotas of Spain and Portugal in those areas. Within that limit of 5 %, in the xávega artisanal beach sein fishery in ICES division 9a, 1 % of the quota of Portugal may be caught with the size below 12 cm.’;

| (b) | the following point is added below the table:






  ‘1. | The minimum conservation reference sizes specified in this Part for haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus), saithe (Pollachius virens), pollack (Pollachius pollachius), hake (Merluccius merluccius), megrim (Lepidorhombus spp.), sole (Solea spp.), plaice (Pleuronectes platessa), whiting (Merlangius merlangus), ling (Molva molva), blue ling (Molva dipterygia), mackerel (Scomber spp.), herring (Clupea harengus), horse mackerel (Trachurus spp.), anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) and sardine (Sardina pilchardus) shall apply to recreational fisheries in the South Western Waters. However, the following minimum conservation reference sizes shall apply in ICES subarea 8 to the following species caught in recreational fisheries:






  Cod (Gadus morhua) | 42 cm |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Red seabream (Pagellus bogaraveo) | 40 cm |
| European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) | 42 cm’ |

(b)

the following point is added below the table:

‘1.

The minimum conservation reference sizes specified in this Part for haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus), saithe (Pollachius virens), pollack (Pollachius pollachius), hake (Merluccius merluccius), megrim (Lepidorhombus spp.), sole (Solea spp.), plaice (Pleuronectes platessa), whiting (Merlangius merlangus), ling (Molva molva), blue ling (Molva dipterygia), mackerel (Scomber spp.), herring (Clupea harengus), horse mackerel (Trachurus spp.), anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) and sardine (Sardina pilchardus) shall apply to recreational fisheries in the South Western Waters. However, the following minimum conservation reference sizes shall apply in ICES subarea 8 to the following species caught in recreational fisheries:

Cod (Gadus morhua)

42 cm

Red seabream (Pagellus bogaraveo)

40 cm

European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax)

42 cm’

Article 2

Entry into force and application

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

It shall apply from 1 January 2021.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 August 2020.

For the Commission

The President

Ursula VON DER LEYEN

---

(1)  
  OJ L 198, 25.7.2019, p. 105.

1

(2)  Regulation (EU) No 1380/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 on the Common Fisheries Policy, amending Council Regulations (EC) No 1954/2003 and (EC) No 1224/2009 and repealing Council Regulations (EC) No 2371/2002 and (EC) No 639/2004 and Council Decision 2004/585/EC (OJ L 354, 28.12.2013, p. 22).

2

(3)  https://stecf.jrc.ec.europa.eu/documents/43805/2694823/STECF+20-04+-+Eval+JRs+LO+and+TM+Reg.pdf pages 165-169 (North Sea) and 219-220 (South Western Waters).

3

(4)  Regulation (EU) 2020/123 of 27 January 2020 fixing for 2020 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, for Union fishing vessels, in certain non-Union waters (OJ L 25, 30.1.2020, p. 1).

4

(5)  Agreed record of fisheries consultations between Norway and the European Union on the regulation of fisheries in the Skagerrak and the Kattegat for 2012.

5

(6)  Agreed record of fisheries consultations between the European Union and Norway on measures for the implementation of a discard ban and control measures in the Skagerrak area, 4 July 2012.

6

(7)  Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/2238 of 1 October 2019 specifying details of implementation of the landing obligation for certain demersal fisheries in the North Sea for the period 2020-2021 (OJ L 336, 30.12.2019, p. 34).

7

(8)  https://stecf.jrc.ec.europa.eu/documents/43805/1710831/STECF+17-08+-+Evaluation+of+LO+joint+recommendations.pdf

8

(9)  Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1394/2014 of 20 October 2014 establishing a discard plan for certain pelagic fisheries in south-western waters (OJ L 370, 30.12.2014, p. 31).

9

(10)  https://stecf.jrc.ec.europa.eu/documents/43805/1471816/STECF+16-10+-+Evaluation+of+LO+joint+recommendations.pdf pages 86-87.

10

(11)  https://stecf.jrc.ec.europa.eu/documents/43805/2660523/STECF+PLEN+20-01.pdf pages 154-155.

11

---

ANNEX

SepNep gear specifications

Image 1

Upper cod end (fish cod-end)

| • | Minimum mesh opening 120mm (between knots) |
| --- | --- |

•

Minimum mesh opening 120mm (between knots)

| • | Maximum 80 mesh round (including selvedges) |
| --- | --- |

•

Maximum 80 mesh round (including selvedges)

Lower cod end (Nephrops cod-end)

| • | Minimum mesh opening 80mm (between knots) |
| --- | --- |

•

Minimum mesh opening 80mm (between knots)

| • | Maximum 110 mesh round (including selvedges) |
| --- | --- |

•

Maximum 110 mesh round (including selvedges)

Separation panel

| • | The separation panel should be attached to all netting material of the trawl, so that the only way for a fish/Nephrops to enter the lower compartment of the trawl is by passing through the meshes of the panel. The panel should guide the large individuals towards the entrance of the upper cod-end. The start of the panel should be connected to the trawl belly. |
| --- | --- |

•

The separation panel should be attached to all netting material of the trawl, so that the only way for a fish/Nephrops to enter the lower compartment of the trawl is by passing through the meshes of the panel. The panel should guide the large individuals towards the entrance of the upper cod-end. The start of the panel should be connected to the trawl belly.

| • | Maximum mesh opening 105mm (between knots) |
| --- | --- |

•

Maximum mesh opening 105mm (between knots)

| • | Minimum length panel 100# meshes |
| --- | --- |

•

Minimum length panel 100# meshes

| • | Aft edge of the panel, maximum 16# mesh wide |
| --- | --- |

•

Aft edge of the panel, maximum 16# mesh wide

| • | The front edge the panel should have a maximum width of 88 % of the trawl width. This equals for instance 2 panel meshes (105mm) on 3 trawl meshes (80mm).






  o | Double knotted Dyneema advised for efficient functioning panel |
| --- | --- | --- |

•

The front edge the panel should have a maximum width of 88 % of the trawl width. This equals for instance 2 panel meshes (105mm) on 3 trawl meshes (80mm).

o

Double knotted Dyneema advised for efficient functioning panel

| o | Floats attached to under panel raise the fore section improving sieving efficiency for Nephrops |
| --- | --- |

o

Floats attached to under panel raise the fore section improving sieving efficiency for Nephrops

Grid (optional)

| • | The grid should be attached to all cod-end or extension netting material around the grid, preventing any form of free entrance to the lower cod-end other than upper openings of the grid. |
| --- | --- |

•

The grid should be attached to all cod-end or extension netting material around the grid, preventing any form of free entrance to the lower cod-end other than upper openings of the grid.

| • | Minimum bar spacing 17mm |
| --- | --- |

•

Minimum bar spacing 17mm

| • | Angle of the grid should be between 40 and 90 degree, but 45 is advised. |
| --- | --- |

•

Angle of the grid should be between 40 and 90 degree, but 45 is advised.

| • | Entrance to the lower cod-end should be on the upper section of the grid. |
| --- | --- |

•

Entrance to the lower cod-end should be on the upper section of the grid.

| • | The vertical grid entrance to the lower cod-end should be maximal 35 % of the combined length of the vertical bar openings and opening to the lower cod-end. |
| --- | --- |

•

The vertical grid entrance to the lower cod-end should be maximal 35 % of the combined length of the vertical bar openings and opening to the lower cod-end.

| • | Weighted curtain ropes (72gr/m, 6mm diameter) are connected to the upper section of the extension or cod-end, and should be at least 4 meshes before the bottom section of the grid. |
| --- | --- |

•

Weighted curtain ropes (72gr/m, 6mm diameter) are connected to the upper section of the extension or cod-end, and should be at least 4 meshes before the bottom section of the grid.

| • | Weighted curtain ropes should be extended until they reach through the lower bars of the grid. |
| --- | --- |

•

Weighted curtain ropes should be extended until they reach through the lower bars of the grid.

Image 2

---