alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2
 Certification
      a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b.
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;c.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andd.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
  a.
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: August 6, 2009
    /s/ Richard N. BurgerChief Financial Officer, ExecutiveVice President, Secretary and Treasurer
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Section 906 Certification**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C. Section 1350), the undersigned officer of Centennial Bank Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Dated: November 13, 2006 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**          I, James E. Minarik, certify that:          1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Directed Electronics, Inc.;          2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;          3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;          4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and          5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.                                                       /s/ James E. Minarik   James E. Minarik  Date:  May 15, 2006 Chief Executive Officer
OAO 247 (02/08) Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

United States of America )

)

)

)

)

)

v.

Brice Bernard Wilson Case No: 3:98cr78-002/LAC

USM No: 04401-107

Date of Previous Judgment: 26 January 1999

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Applicable) Defendant’s Attorney

Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

Upon motion of : the defendant 9 the Director of the Bureau of Prisons 9 the court under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has

subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 994(u), and having considered such motion,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:

9 DENIED. : GRANTED and the defendant’s previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in 

the last judgment issued) of 228 months is reduced to 195* .

I. COURT DETERMINATION OF GUIDELINE RANGE (Prior to Any Departures)

Previous Offense Level: 32 Amended Offense Level: 30

Criminal History Category: IV Criminal History Category: IV

Previous Guideline Range: 168 to 210 months Amended Guideline Range: 135 to 168 months

II. SENTENCE RELATIVE TO AMENDED GUIDELINE RANGE

: The reduced sentence as to Counts 1 and 2 is within the amended guideline range.

9 The previous term of imprisonment imposed was less than the guideline range applicable to the defendant at the time

of sentencing as a result of a departure or Rule 35 reduction, and the reduced sentence is comparably less than the

amended guideline range.

9 Other (explain):

III. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

*135 months on each of Counts 1 and 2, 60 months as to Count 3 and 120 months as to Count 5. Counts 1, 2 and

5 are to run concurrently. The sentence in Count 3 is consecutive to Counts 1, 2 and 5, as required by statute, for a total

term of imprisonment of 195 months. 

Except as provided above, all provisions of the judgment dated 26 January 1999 shall remain in effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Order Date: s/L.A. Collier 3 July 2008

Judge’s signature

Effective Date: Lacey A. Collier, Senior U.S. District Judge

(if different from order date) Printed name and title

Case 3:98-cr-00078-LC-MD Document 296 Filed 07/03/08 Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHAD CRAIG RENFRO

- NARDUZZI,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 128 MM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 15th day of October , 2018, in consideration of the Request for

Appointment of Counsel, this matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of

Centre County for it to determine, within 60 days, whether an attorney should be

reappointed to represent Petitioner.

The Court of Common Pleas of Centre County is instructed to promptly notify this

Court of its determination.
§ 235.9 Procurement and property management standards. ( a ) *Requirements.* State agencies shall comply with the requirements of 2 CFR part 200, subpart D and USDA implementing regulations 2 CFR part 400 and part 415 concerning the procurement of supplies, equipment and other services with State Administrative Expense Funds.
( b ) *Contractual responsibilities.* The standards contained in 2 CFR part 200, subpart D and USDA implementing regulations 2 CFR part 400 and part 415 do not relieve the State agency of any contractual responsibilities under its contract. The State agency is the responsible authority, without recourse to FNS, regarding the settlement and satisfaction of all contractual and administrative issues arising out of procurements entered into in connection with the Program. This includes, but is not limited to source evaluation, protests, disputes, claims, or other matters of a contractual nature. Matters concerning violation of law are to be referred to the local, State or Federal authority that has proper jurisdiction.
( c ) *Procurement procedure.* The State agency may use its own procurement procedures which reflect applicable State laws and regulations, in accordance with 2 CFR part 200, subpart D and USDA implementing regulations 2 CFR part 400 and part 415.
( d ) *Property acquired with State administrative expense funds.* State Agencies shall comply with the requirements of 2 CFR part 200, subpart D and USDA implementing regulations 2 CFR part 400 and part 415 in their utilization and disposition of property acquired in whole or in part with State Administrative Expense Funds.
(Pub. L. 79-396, 60 Stat. 231 (42 U.S.C. 1751); Pub. L. 89-642, 80 Stat. 885-890 (42 U.S.C. 1773); Pub. L. 91-248, 84 Stat. 207 (42 U.S.C. 1759))
[Amdt. 9, 48 FR 19355, Apr. 29, 1983, as amended at 71 FR 39519, July 13, 200; 81 FR 66493, Sept. 28, 2016]
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 10.15  


 
 

REGAL ENTERTAINMENT GROUP
  SUMMARY OF
  ANNUAL EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE PROGRAM    
    


        Our board of directors and stockholders have approved the following material terms for payment of bonuses under our annual executive incentive programs. 


        Payment
of an annual incentive to a covered executive officer is contingent upon the attainment of one or more performance goals (which may be stated as alternative goals) established in
writing by the compensation committee of the board of directors (while the attainment of such goals is substantially uncertain) for a covered executive officer for each performance period, which is
generally our taxable year. Performance goals may be based on one or more business criteria that apply to an individual, a business unit or our company as a whole, but need not be based on an increase
or positive result under the business criteria selected. The compensation committee is prohibited from increasing the amount of compensation payable if a performance goal is met, but may reduce or
eliminate compensation even if such performance goal is attained. 


        Performance
goals are based on one or more of the following business criteria: (1) total stockholder return; (2) such total stockholder return as compared to total return
(on a comparable basis) of a publicly available index such as, but not limited to, the Standard & Poor's 500 Stock Index; (3) net income; (4) pretax earnings; (5) earnings
before interest expense, taxes, depreciation and amortization; (6) earnings before interest expense, taxes, depreciation, amortization and rent; (7) pretax operating earnings after
interest expense and before bonuses and extraordinary or special items; (8) operating margin; (9) earnings per share; (10) return on equity; (11) return on capital;
(12) return on investment; (13) operating earnings; (14) working capital; (15) ratio of debt to stockholders' equity; and (16) revenue. The maximum annual incentive
award that may be granted to any covered executive officer based on attainment of one or more of the foregoing performance goals is $1 million. 


        The
annual incentive compensation payable in any fiscal year based on such performance goals cannot be determined because the payment of such compensation is contingent upon attainment
of the pre-established performance goals, the maximum amount of such compensation depends on our company's performance for the applicable performance period, and the actual annual
incentive compensation to a covered executive officer may reflect exercise of the compensation committee's
discretion to reduce the annual incentive compensation otherwise payable upon attainment of the performance goal. 











QuickLinks


REGAL ENTERTAINMENT GROUP SUMMARY OF ANNUAL EXECUTIVE INCENTIVE PROGRAM
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Devane Diaz, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered December 9, 1977, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. In his summation, the prosecutor repeatedly told the jurors, over defense objection, that in order to acquit the defendant of possession of a gun, they would have to find that "[the arresting officer] took that stand and he lied. That [the officer] took that stand and he- framed the defendant for possessing that gun. That he would take the stand, that he would risk his job, his security, the security of his family”. We have repeatedly condemned such remarks as prejudicial and again do so here (see, e.g., *People v Webb,*68 AD2d 331; cf. *People v Goggins,*64 AD2d 717, 718). We nevertheless affirm the judgment because the evidence points so strongly to possession of the gun by defendant that there is no "significant probability” that the jury would have acquitted him had the prejudicial remarks not been made (see *People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230, 242). We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Damiani, J. P., O’Connor, Lazer and Rabin, JJ., concur.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

USA, 

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:02-cr-00045-MP-AK-3

CRAIG CHARLES BOLLES, 

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on doc. 193, Motion for Relief from Judgment or

Order Pursuant to Rule 60(b)(6) by Craig Charles Bolles. The defendant seeks relief

from the Court’s order vacating judgment and re-imposing sentence, doc. 177, and the

Court’s order denying de novo review of his § 2255 motion to vacate, doc. 189.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The government is directed to respond to the defendant’s motion for relief

on or before January 13, 2012.

DONE AND ORDERED this 21st day of December, 2011. 

áBZtÜç eA ]ÉÇxá 

GARY R. JONES

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 1:02-cr-00045-MP-GRJ Document 194 Filed 12/21/11 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

GABRIEL KENON,

Inmate No. 372356,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:20cv3660/LAC/EMT

S. MAY, WARDEN, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________/

ORDER

The chief magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on March

30, 2021 (ECF No. 10). The parties were furnished a copy of the Report and

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title

28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined it

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No.

10) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a

claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
Page 2 of 2

§§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), 1915A(b)(1).

3. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with

this order and close the case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 21st day of May, 2021.

 s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No.: 3:20cv3660/LAC/EMT
#### § 29.1038 No-G.

A designation applied to a lot of tobacco which is offtype, semicured, fire-killed, smoked, oxidized over 10 percent, or has an odor foreign to the type. (See Rule 23.)

[47 FR 51721, Nov. 17, 1982. Redesignated at 48 FR 29671, June 28, 1983, 49 FR 16756, Apr. 20, 1984, and 51 FR 25027, July 10, 1986]
2 

reunified with Phyllis A.B. and has terminated their wardship. Under 

these unique circumstances, we decline to reach the merits of this appeal. 

Accordingly, we grant respondents' motion, and we 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 

J. 

Hardesty 

"c24...X 

Parraguirre 

cc: Hon. Robert Teuton, District Judge, Family Court Division 

Clark County District Attorney/Juvenile Division 

Children's Attorney Project 

Marquis Aurbach Coffing 

Kim L.W. 

Melinda Simpkins, Special Public Defender 

Roger B.K. 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 222 (Thursday, November 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70674-70675]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29069]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION

Ocean Transportation Intermediary License; Revocation

    The Federal Maritime Commission hereby gives notice that the 
following Ocean Transportation Intermediary licenses have been revoked 
pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. Chapter 
409) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing 
of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515, effective on 
the corresponding date shown below:

    License Number: 004027F.
    Name: U.S. Airfreight, Inc.
    Address: 2624 NW. 112th Avenue, Doral, FL 33172.
    Date Revoked: October 28, 2010.

[[Page 70675]]

    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

    License Number: 010182N.
    Name: Cargo Specialists International, Inc.
    Address: 241 Forsgate Drive, Suite 108, Jamesburg, NJ 08831.
    Date Revoked: October 22, 2010.
    Reason: Surrendered license voluntarily.

    License Number: 017975N.
    Name: Johnny Air Cargo, Inc.
    Address: 69-04 Roosevelt Avenue, Woodside, NY 11377.
    Date Revoked: October 20, 2010.
    Reason: Surrendered license voluntarily.

    License Number: 18050F.
    Name: Trident Forwarding Service, Inc.
    Address: 6980 NW. 43rd Street, Miami, FL 33166.
    Date Revoked: October 29, 2010.
    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

    License Number: 019728NF.
    Name: MHX International LLC.
    Address: 300 David Lane, Roselle, IL 60172.
    Date Revoked: October 27, 2010.
    Reason: Failed to maintain valid bonds.

    License Number: 020760F.
    Name: AAA Cuban Transportation Cargo & Logistics, Inc.
    Address: 6025 West 12th Avenue, Hialeah, FL 33012.
    Date Revoked: October 27, 2010.
    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

    License Number: 021720N.
    Name: Logicargo ASL Int'l Corp.
    Address: 7707 NW. 46th Street, Doral, FL 33166.
    Date Revoked: October 27, 2010.
    Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

Sandra L. Kusumoto,
Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.
[FR Doc. 2010-29069 Filed 11-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
```
EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements and related Prospectuses of our report dated February 2, 1999, on our
audits of the consolidated financial statements and the financial statements
schedules of UNUM Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997,
and for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997, and 1996, which report is
included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A:

           Form S-8 No. 33-31270 pertaining to the UNUM Employees 401(k) Plan
           (formerly the UNUM Employees Retirement Savings Plan and Trust)

           Form S-8 No. 33-19090 pertaining to the 1987 Executive Stock Option
           Plan

           Form S-8 No. 33-38225 pertaining to the 1990 Long-Term Stock
           Incentive Plan

           Form S-8 No. 33-52741 pertaining to the 1990 Long-Term Stock
           Incentive Plan (additional shares)

           Form S-3 No. 33-36873 pertaining to the 1990 Debt Securities

           Form S-3 No. 33-69132 pertaining to the 1993 Debt Securities,
           Preferred Stock, Common Stock and Warrants

           Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 on Form S-8 to Registration Statement
           on Form S-4 No. 33-55870 pertaining to the issuance of UNUM
           Corporation shares upon the exercise of stock options granted under
           the Colonial Plans as defined therein

           Form S-3 No. 333-08187 pertaining to the 1996 Debt Securities,
           Preferred Stock, Common Stock and Warrants

           Form S-8 No. 333-41917 pertaining to the 1998 Goals Stock Option Plan

           Form S-8 No. 333-41897 pertaining to the 1996 Long-Term Stock
           Incentive Plan

/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Portland, Maine
June 1, 1999
Summary Term Sheet of Board Compensation



 







Exhibit 10.36




Kos Pharmaceuticals, Inc.




Non-Employee Director Compensation




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Per Meeting	 	Annual
	Board Meetings:
	 	 	 	 
	Annual Retainer
	 	 	 	$20,000
	Meetings*
	 	$2,500	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Committees:
	 	 	 	 
	Chairperson Retainer
	 	 	 	$5,000
	Meetings*
	 	$2,000	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Stock Option Awards:
	 	 	 	 
	Upon First Election
	 	 	 	15,000 shares
	Each Anniversary
	 	 	 	30,000 shares
	Each Annual Meeting
	 	 	 	10,000 shares












	 	 	*Telephone attendance fees are $500 per meeting.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ FREDERIC SCHEERFrederic ScheerChief Executive OfficerMay 9, 2008/s/ STEPHAN GARDENStephan GardenSVP Finance & Business DevelopmentMay 9, 2008
2005-2282.

#### Stemple v. Dunina.

Miami App. No. 04CA40, 2005-Ohio-5590. Reported at 108 Ohio St.3d 1510, 2006-Ohio-1329, 844 N.E.2d 855. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.