Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 224 / Monday, November 22, 2010 / Notices 71101 

and (7) transmitting, or otherwise 

disclosing the information. 

The estimate of cost for respondents 

is based upon salaries for professional 

and clerical support, as well as direct 

and indirect overhead costs. Direct costs 

include all costs directly attributable to 

providing this information, such as 

administrative costs and the cost for 

information technology. Indirect or 

overhead costs are costs incurred by an 

organization in support of its mission. 

These costs apply to activities which 

benefit the whole organization rather 

than any one particular function or 

activity. 

Any additional comments are invited 

on: (1) Whether the proposed 

collections of information are necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the Commission, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; (2) the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimates of the burden of the 

proposed collections of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; (3) 

ways to enhance the quality, utility and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and (4) ways to minimize the 

burden of the collections of information 

on those who are to respond, including 

the use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g. permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2010–29304 Filed 11–19–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

[Docket No. CP11–28–000] 

Monroe Gas Storage Company, LLC; 

Notice of Application 

November 12, 2010. 

Take notice that on November 12, 

2010, Monroe Gas Storage Company, 

LLC (Monroe), 3773 Cherry Creek North 

Drive, Suite 1000, Denver, CO 80209, 

filed pursuant to Section 7(c) of the 

Natural Gas Act and the Commission’s 

regulations thereunder, an abbreviated 

application for an amendment to its 

certificate of public convenience and 

necessity authorizing Monroe to make 

changes to the certificated design of the 

Monroe Gas Storage Project. 

Specifically, Through this 

Application, Monroe seeks 

authorization to (1) change the location 

of the Well MGS–4 surface facilities to 

another existing Project well pad, (2) 

move the Well MGS–9 surface facilities 

to a different location on the currently 

authorized well pad, and (3) modify the 

Project’s water disposal facilities by 

adding a water disposal well—Monroe 

Water Disposal #1 (‘‘MWD–1’’). In 

conjunction with the relocation of Wells 

MGS–4–E–V and MGS–9–E–V, Monroe 

also proposes to relocate the bottom 

hole location of the wells and 

redesignate these wells as Wells MGS– 

4–E–D and MGS–9–ED. 

Monroe states that the proposed 

amendment will not change its 

currently certificated authority to 

provide about 12.0 billion cubic feet 

(Bcf) of high-deliverability working gas 

storage capacity, with about 4.46 Bcf of 

base gas. Nor is any change proposed in 

Monroe’s certificated capability for 

receiving and injecting gas at maximum 

rates of up to 445 million cubic feet per 

day (MMcf/d) and withdrawing and 

delivering gas at maximum rates of up 

to 465 MMcf/d. 

Any questions regarding the 

application should be directed to Fred 

Witsell, Monroe Gas Storage Company, 

LLC, 3773 Cherry Creek North Drive, 

Suite 1000, Denver, CO 80209, (303) 

815.1010, or Erik J.A. Swenson, 

Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P, 801 

Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20004–2623, (202) 622– 

4555. 

There are two ways to become 

involved in the Commission’s review of 

this project. First, any person wishing to 

obtain legal status by becoming a party 

to the proceedings for this project 

should, on or before the comment date 

stated below, file with the Federal 

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 

First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, 

a motion to intervene in accordance 

with the requirements of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211) 

and the Regulations under the NGA (18 

CFR 157.10). A person obtaining party 

status will be placed on the service list 

maintained by the Secretary of the 

Commission and will receive copies of 

all documents filed by the applicant and 

by all other parties. A party must submit 

7 copies of filings made with the 

Commission and must mail a copy to 

the applicant and to every other party in 

the proceeding. Only parties to the 

proceeding can ask for court review of 

Commission orders in the proceeding. 

However, a person does not have to 

intervene in order to have comments 

considered. The second way to 

participate is by filing with the 

Secretary of the Commission, as soon as 

possible, an original and two copies of 

comments in support of or in opposition 

to this project. The Commission will 

consider these comments in 

determining the appropriate action to be 

taken, but the filing of a comment alone 

will not serve to make the filer a party 

to the proceeding. The Commission’s 

rules require that persons filing 

comments in opposition to the project 

provide copies of their protests only to 

the party or parties directly involved in 

the protest. 

Persons who wish to comment only 

on the environmental review of this 

project should submit an original and 

two copies of their comments to the 

Secretary of the Commission. 

Environmental commentors will be 

placed on the Commission’s 

environmental mailing list, will receive 

copies of the environmental documents, 

and will be notified of meetings 

associated with the Commission’s 

environmental review process. 

Environmental commentors will not be 

required to serve copies of filed 

documents on all other parties. 

However, the non-party commentors 

will not receive copies of all documents 

filed by other parties or issued by the 

Commission (except for the mailing of 

environmental documents issued by the 

Commission) and will not have the right 

to seek court review of the 

Commission’s final order. 

The Commission strongly encourages 

electronic filings of comments, protests 

and interventions in lieu of paper using 

the ‘‘eFiling’’ link at http://www.ferc.gov. 

Persons unable to file electronically 

should submit an original and 14 copies 

of the protest or intervention to the 

Federal Energy regulatory Commission, 

888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 

20426. This filing is accessible on-line 

at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 

‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for 

review in the Commission’s Public 

Reference Room in Washington, DC. 

There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the 

Web site that enables subscribers to 

receive e-mail notification when a 

document is added to a subscribed 

docket(s). For assistance with any FERC 

Online service, please e-mail 

FERCOnline Support@ferc.gov, or call 

(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call 

(202) 502–8659. 

Comment Date: November 22, 2010. 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2010–29303 Filed 11–19–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES