alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> U.S.DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           226,834
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                       6,132
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 257,321
<CASH>                                           1,251
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             147,104
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           5,403
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 501,207
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                278,432
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                             48,659
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                 20,942
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           837
<OTHER-SE>                                     130,405
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   501,207
<PREMIUMS>                                      85,002
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             14,435
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               2,827
<OTHER-INCOME>                                   5,953
<BENEFITS>                                      52,620
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     14,938
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            22,231
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,184
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,638
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,546
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,546
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.50
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 132,558
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                             53,654
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              (1,034)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                            (12,921)
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                              (32,416)
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                139,841
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        (1,034)


</TABLE>
#### § 29.3008 Class.

A major division of tobacco based on method of cure or principal usage.

[24 FR 8771, Oct. 29, 1959. Redesignated at 49 FR 16757, Apr. 20, 1984]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Saverio Ciavarella and Frank Nappi, Appellants.

Judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered December 15, 1965, and January 5, 1966, reversed, on the law, and a new trial granted. The findings of fact implicit in the jury’s verdict are affirmed. Under the circumstances disclosed by this record, the admission of prejudicial testimony as to the previous identification of defendants requires a reversal of their convictions and a new trial *(People*v. *Caserta,*19 N Y 2d 18; *People*v. *Mantesta,*27 A D 2d 748; *People*v. *Trowbridge,*305 N. Y. 471; *People*v. *Hagedorny,*272 App. Div. 830). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
Intalco's reported Monthly Production and potline SO2 information 2009, 2010, and 2011

Limit means permitted limitation on production or emissions lb/ton limit is lb of pollutant per ton of 

2009

Operating 

or 

emission 

Limit UNITS Jan Feb Mar Apr

Average Aluminum Production307000 tpy 841 ton/day ton/day 532.6 521.9 514.65 506.8

Sulfur Dioxide 37,780 lbs./day 21151 20828 19921 20972

44.8 lbs./Ton 38 39.1 39.4 40.0

Potdays 720 pots/day 454.0 444.0 440.0 430.0

% of operating pots (operating pots/720 pots) 63 62 61 60

2010

Average Aluminum Production307000 tpy 841 ton/day ton/day 513.2 526.8 533.34 534.8

Sulfur Dioxide 37,780 lbs./day 23967 22229 21566 25548

44.8 lbs./Ton 43.4 43.1 43.1 43.4

Potdays 720 pots/day 443.0 451.0 451.0 465.0

% of operating pots (operating pots/720 pots) 62 63 63 65

2011

Average Aluminum Production307000 tpy 841 ton/day ton/day 536.3 581.3 639.89 649.5

37780 lbs./day 20203 24263 25263 24499

44.8 lbs./Ton 38.1 39.9 39.8 39.8

720 pots/day 461 551.0 556.0 566.0

% of operating pots (operating pots/720 pots) 64 77 77 79

The plant contains 720 pots, divided equally among 3 potlines. Part of a potline (potroom) can be energized w

Sulfur Dioxide

Potdays
s lb of pollutant per ton of Al produced, calculated monthly

May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Monthly 

Avg

495.3 481.4 485.3 485.8 485.2 487.7 497.6 499.3 499.5

20109 20374 20404 20351 20856 20902 21444 20240 20629

40.2 41.43 41.7 42.1 42.3 42.7 43.1 42.2 41.0

425.0 416.0 414.0 417.0 418 414.0 425 427 427.0

59 58 58 58 58 58 59 59 59.3

550.4 561.1 544.7 540.6 548.0 546.5 550.9 541.6 541.0

23698 25806 24634 23312 21217 20822 20058 21836 22891

43.6 45.5 44.8 44.8 42.4 40.0 37.7 38.3 42.5

467.0 467.0 464.0 467.0 470 468.0 467 464 462.0

65 65 64 65 65 65 65 64 64.2

668.3 661.5 661.9 661.5 671.1 655.2 649.9 636.6 639.4

22578 21994 24468 22220 25159 23764 20569 22660 23137

37.2 34.92 34.7 34.6 36 35.8 35.1 34.5 36.7

568.0 569.0 566.0 571.0 566 561.0 549.0 545.0 552.4

79 79 79 79 79 78 76 76 76.7

troom) can be energized without energizing or starting up the whole potline.
# Journal officiel C 70A/24 f

| | ISSN 1977-0936 |
| --- | --- |
| Journal officiel
  de l'Union européenne | C 70A |
| | |
| Édition de langue française | Communications et informations | 59e année24 février 2016 |

ISSN 1977-0936

Journal officiel

de l'Union européenne

C 70A

Édition de langue française

Communications et informations

59e année24 février 2016

---

| Numéro d'information | Sommaire | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Avis |
| | PROCÉDURES ADMINISTRATIVES |
| | Office européen de sélection du personnel (EPSO) |
| 2016/C 070A/01 | Liste de réserve — Concours général EPSO/AST/134/14 — Assistants (AST 3) dans le domaine des travaux parlementaires | 1 |

Numéro d'information

Sommaire

page

V   Avis

PROCÉDURES ADMINISTRATIVES

Office européen de sélection du personnel (EPSO)

2016/C 070A/01

Liste de réserve — Concours général EPSO/AST/134/14 — Assistants (AST 3) dans le domaine des travaux parlementaires

1

---

| FR | |
| --- | --- |

FR

---

V Avis

PROCÉDURES ADMINISTRATIVES

Office européen de sélection du personnel (EPSO)

| 24.2.2016 | FR | Journal officiel de l'Union européenne | CA 70/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2016

FR

Journal officiel de l'Union européenne

CA 70/1

---

LISTE DE RÉSERVE

CONCOURS GÉNÉRAL EPSO/AST/134/14

ASSISTANTS (AST 3) DANS LE DOMAINE DES TRAVAUX PARLEMENTAIRES

(2016/C 070 A/01)

| BUSTOS | Virginia |
| --- | --- |
| CRISAN | Nadina Andreea |
| D’ALMEIDA | Irina |
| DAMIANIDOU | Dorothea |
| DEBNÁROVÁ | Ľubica |
| DELACOUR | Catherine |
| DIGREGORIO | Chiara |
| DITU | Simona |
| EVANGELISTA | Gladys |
| GAIDARJI | Aura |
| GONTSAROVA | Darja |
| GRAZIOTTI | Piergiorgio |
| GUINA | Adela |
| HERTZ-FARAGÓ | Hajnalka |
| IORI | Andrea |
| KOTSIS | Réka |
| KRASTEVA | Viktoriya |
| MARCOCCHIO | Cathy |
| MINKOVA | Maria |
| MONTOYA LOZANO | Andrés Antonio |
| NODARI | Mirko |
| NONIS | Ester |
| PASKEVICIUTE | Lina |
| PEDEN | Hilary |
| PIPPIDOU | Dimitra |
| REIMERS | Alexander René |
| RODIADIS | Antonios |
| SCHERER | Daphne |
| SZABO | Razvan Nicolae |
| VILLEGAS TERÁN | Maria Eugenia |

BUSTOS

Virginia

CRISAN

Nadina Andreea

D’ALMEIDA

Irina

DAMIANIDOU

Dorothea

DEBNÁROVÁ

Ľubica

DELACOUR

Catherine

DIGREGORIO

Chiara

DITU

Simona

EVANGELISTA

Gladys

GAIDARJI

Aura

GONTSAROVA

Darja

GRAZIOTTI

Piergiorgio

GUINA

Adela

HERTZ-FARAGÓ

Hajnalka

IORI

Andrea

KOTSIS

Réka

KRASTEVA

Viktoriya

MARCOCCHIO

Cathy

MINKOVA

Maria

MONTOYA LOZANO

Andrés Antonio

NODARI

Mirko

NONIS

Ester

PASKEVICIUTE

Lina

PEDEN

Hilary

PIPPIDOU

Dimitra

REIMERS

Alexander René

RODIADIS

Antonios

SCHERER

Daphne

SZABO

Razvan Nicolae

VILLEGAS TERÁN

Maria Eugenia

La validité de la liste expirera le 30 juin 2019.

---
#### § 30.10 Cure.

To dry the sap from newly harvested tobacco by either natural or artificial process. Proper curing is done under such conditions as will permit of the chemical and physiological changes necessary to develop the desired quality of color in tobacco.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10(h)

                          FIDELITY SOUTHERN CORPORATION

                       EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS

         The base salary for each of named executive officers of Fidelity
Southern Corporation (the "Company") for fiscal 2005 are:


              James B. Miller, Jr.                    $300,000
              H. Palmer Proctor, Jr.                  $250,000
                David Buchanan                        $230,000
             M. Howard Griffith, Jr.                  $230,000

         In addition to the foregoing, the Company pays all or a portion of the
premiums for split dollar and/or corporate life insurance policies for each of
the executive officers and pays annual club fees for each executive officer
other than Mr. Buchanan. Under the split dollar policies, the Company will
receive upon termination of the policies proceeds equal to the insurance
premiums paid plus a market yield.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KEE LEE, DBA Chin’s Market and

Kitchen,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 13-15434

D.C. No. 1:11-cv-00881-AWISAB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Anthony W. Ishii, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 18, 2015** 

Before: TASHIMA, OWENS, and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges. 

Kee Lee, DBA Chin’s Market and Kitchen, appeals pro se from the district

court’s summary judgment in his 7 U.S.C. § 2023 action seeking judicial review of 

the United States Department of Agriculture Food and Nutrition Service’s (“FNS”)

FILED

DEC 01 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
final decision permanently disqualifying his store from participating in the federal

food stamp program. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de

novo the district court’s legal conclusions and for clear error its factual findings. 

Wong v. United States, 859 F.2d 129, 131 (9th Cir. 1988). We affirm. 

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Lee failed to

raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether the hundreds of suspicious

transactions identified by FNS did not show that Lee was trafficking in food

stamps. See 7 U.S.C. § 2021(b)(3)(B) (providing for permanent disqualification

from participation in the federal food stamp program on the first occasion of

trafficking); 7 C.F.R. § 271.2 (defining trafficking as “[t]he buying, selling,

stealing, or otherwise effecting an exchange of [food stamp] benefits issued and

accessed . . . for cash or consideration other than eligible food . . . . ”); see also Kim

v. United States, 121 F.3d 1269, 1272 (9th Cir. 1997) (“The burden is placed upon

the store owner to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the violations did

not occur.”). 

AFFIRMED.

2 13-15434
| 1. | I      have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of IR BioSciences      Holdings, Inc.; and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this      report. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      April 30, 2009                                                                                                |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                                                                                                     |   |   |
| /s/      John N.      Fermanis                |   |   |   |
| John      N. Fermanis                                                                                                    |   |   |
| Chief      Financial Officer                                                                                             |   |   |
| (Principal      Financial Officer)                                                                                       |   |   |
2006-0503.

#### In re Foster.

Cuyahoga App. No. 85716, 2006-Ohio-88. On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion granted.

Pfeifer, O’Connor and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.
EXHIBIT 32 

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to 

18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 

as Adopted Pursuant to 

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of BlackRock Capital Investment Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), James E. Keenan, as Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Michael Pungello, as Interim Chief Financial Officer and Interim Treasurer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and consolidated results of operations of the Company. 

 

|                              |                                                       |
|------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                         |                                                  |
| /s/ James E. Keenan

   |
| Name:                        | James E. Keenan                                       |
| Title:                       | Interim Chief Executive Officer                       |
| Date:                        | May 01, 2019                                          |
|                         |
| /s/ Michael Pungello

  |
| Name:                        | Michael Pungello                                      |
| Title:                       | Interim Chief Financial Officer and Interim Treasurer |
| Date:                        | May 01, 2019                                          |
## United States Court of App eals
F O R T H E E I G H T H C I R C U I T

__ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 1- 10 82

__ __ __ __ __ _ Leo na rd Bri gh t, *
* App el la nt , *
* App eal fro m

th e Uni te d S ta te s v. * Dis tri ctCo ur t fo r th e * W es te rn Dis tri ct of M is so ur i. Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca, *
* [UNPUBLISHED] App el le e. *

__ __ __ __ __ _ Su bm it te d: May 5, 2 01 1 Fi le d: Ju ne 13 , 20 11

__ __ __ __ __ _ Befo re LOKEN, MURPHY, and COLLOTON, Cir cu it Ju dg es

.

__ __ __ __ __ _ PER CURI AM.

Leo na rd Bri gh t ap pe al s th e di st ric t co ur t’s di sm is sa l of hi s ci vi l act io n 1 cl ai m in g th at th e IRS’s se iz ur e of hi s w a g e s was un co ns ti tu ti on al

. Rev ie win g de

no vo , se e Has ti ng s v. W il so n, 51 6 F.3 d 10 55 , 10 58 (8 th Ci r. 20 08 ), we co nc lu de th at to th e ex te nt Bri gh t at te m pt ed to pro ceed un de r 42 U.S.C. §§ 19 83 , 19 85 or B iv en s
v. Si x Unk no wn Nam ed Age nt s of Fed . B ur eau of Narco ti c s , 4 0 3 U

. S. 38 8 (1 97 1) , he fai le d t o st at e a cl ai m . He all eg ed no fact s s ho win g s ta te act io n o r a co ns pi racy,
se e Zut z v. Nels on , 60 1 F.3 d 84 2, 84 8 (8 th Ci r. 20 10 ); Kur tz v. Ci ty of Sh rews bu ry ,
The Hon or ab le Gary A. Fen ne r, Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e fo r th e W es te rn 1 Dis tri ct of M is so ur i.24 5 F.3 d 75 3, 7 5 8 (8 th Ci r. 20 01 ), he ga ve no in di cat io n as to th e in vo lv em en t or

id en t i t y o f an y in di vi du al s who al le ge dl y co m m it te d co ns ti tu ti on al vi ol at io ns , se e Ell is v. Nor ris , 1 79 F.3 d 10 78 , 1 07 9 (8 th Ci r. 19 99 ), an d a Biv en s ac ti on can no t b e pr os ecu te d ag ai ns t th e Uni te d St at es , se e Bu fo rd v. Ru nyon , 16 0 F.3 d 11 99 , 12 03 (8 th Ci r. 19 98 ).

Fu rth er, we ag ree wit h th e d i s t r i c t co ur t th at 28 U.S.C. § 13 46 (a)( 1) di d no t

co nf er su bjec t m at te r juri sd ic ti on ov er th is act io n, be cau se Bri gh t di d no t al le ge th at he fil ed a cl ai m fo r a refu nd wit h th e IRS or th at he pa id an y as se ss m en t in fu ll

. See 26 U.S.C. § 74 22 (a); Fl or a v. Uni te d St at es , 36 2 U.S. 14 5, 17 7 (1 96 0)

. Bas ed on th e
reco rd be lo w, we al so ag ree th at 26 U.S.C. § 74 21 (a) ap pl ie d to ba r th e act io n in so far

as it so u g h t rel ie f fro m ta x- co ll ect io n act iv it ie s. See Pag on is v. Uni te d St at es , 57 5 F

. 3d 80 9, 81 3, 81 5 (8 th Ci r. 20 09 ); St on e v. Harry, 36 4 F.3 d 91 2, 91 4- 15 (8 th Ci r. 20 04 ).

Acco rd in gl y , we affi rm . See 8 th Cir . R. 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
Date: November 10, 2015

Meeting: Oil and Gas

Agency Meeting with Gas Processors Association - List of Attendees

No. Name Organization Phone Number

1. Chris Stoneman EPA Stoneman.chris@epa.gov

2. Greg Nizich EPA Nizich.greg@epa.gov

3. Daivd Oldaker Enterprise 

Products

Dkoldaker@eprod.com

4. Jaron Hill Williams Jaron.hill@williams.com

5. Matt Hite GPA Mhite@gpaglobal.org

6. Claudio Galli Enbridge Claudio.galli@enbridge.com

7. Melanie Roberts Targa Mroberts@targaresources.com

8. Adrienne Sandoval Tesoro 

Logistics

Adrienne.sandoval@tsocorp.com

9. Jeff Stovall Crestwood Stovall.jeff@crestwoodlp.com

10. Bruce Moore EPA Moore.bruce@epa.gov

11. Lisa Thompson EPA Thompson.lisa@epa.gov

12. Amy Hambrick EPA Hambrick.amy@epa.gov

13. Charlene Spells EPA Spells.charlene@epa.gov

14. Jameel Alsalam EPA Alsalam.jameel@epa.gov

15. Matthew Witosky EPA Witosky.matthew@epa.gov

16. Ronnie Hanzel EC/R Inc. Hanzel.veronica@ecrweb.com

17. Jodi Howard EPA Howard.jodi@epa.gov
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:88-cr-01007-MP-AK-2

WILLIE BUD REED, JR,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 1409, Complaint in Actions Grounded on Federal

Question of Special Federal Statute and/or Motion to Revisit § 2255 by Willie Bud Reed, Jr. 

Defendant, having exhausted all means of post-conviction relief, has filed over twenty motions

for reconsideration. The instant motion fails to specify which of the Court’s orders should be

revisited and the authority for doing so. Moreover, defendant’s motion, filed more than eleven

years after the Court denied his motion to vacate and set aside the sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255, is untimely.

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. Defendant’s motion to revisit § 2255, Doc. 1409, is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 29th day of August, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:88-cr-01007-MW-GRJ Document 1412 Filed 08/29/11 Page 1 of 1
###### Editorial Note on Part 1980

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1980 appear at 80 FR 9905, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1980.403 Citizenship of borrowers.

Loans to individuals will be made or guaranteed only to those who are citizens of the United States or reside in the United States after being legally admitted for permanent residence. At least 51 percent of the outstanding interest in any corporation or organization-type applicant must be owned by those who are either citizens of the United States or reside in the United States after being legally admitted for permanent residence.
#### § 29.2281 Maturity.

The degree of ripeness. (See chart, § 29.2351.)
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 2, 2006, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert J. Krakauer, Executive Vice President, Corporate Operations, and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                           
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|/s/ Robert J. Krakauer                                                     
|Robert J. Krakauer                                                         
|Executive Vice President, Corporate Operations, and Chief Financial Officer
|August 14, 2006                                                            

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2212 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a 3-year recovery 

period for all race horses. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 24, 2013 

Mr. BARR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a 

3-year recovery period for all race horses. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Race Horse Cost Re5 covery Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. THREE-YEAR DEPRECIATION FOR RACE HORSES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Clause (i) of section 168(e)(3)(A) 

8 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read 

9 as follows: 

10 ‘‘(i) any race horse,’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2212 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to property placed in service after 

3 December 31, 2013. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### HOGUE, Respondent, v. SIMONSON et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

June 1, 1906.)

Action by Patrick J. Rogue against Morris W. Simonson and others.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.