alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE COURT OF CRIM INAL AP P EALS

OF TEXAS

N O

. W R

- 8 5

, 9 4 1

- 0 1

E X P A R T E F I D E N C I O V A L D E Z

, A p p l i c a n t

O N A P P L I C A T I O N F O R P O S T

- C O N V I C T I O N W R I T O F H A B E A S C O R P U S

I N C A U S E N O

. 2 0 1 2 0 D 0 0 7 4 9

- 3 8 4

- 0 1 I N T H E 3 8 4 J U D I C I A L D I S T R I C T T H

C O U R T

E L P A S O C O U N T Y

P e r c u r i a m

.

O R D E R

I n M a y 2 0 1 4

, a j u r y f

o u n d A p p l i c a n t g u i l t y o f t h e o f f e n s e o f c a p i t a l m u r d e r

. S e e

T E X

. P E N A L C O D E § 1 9

. 0 3 ( a )

. B a s e d o n t h e j u r y ’ s a n s w e r s t o t h e s t a t u t o r y p u n i s h m e n t

q u e s t i o n s s e t o u t i n T e x a s C o d e o f C r i m i n a l P r o c e d u r e A r t i c l e 3 7

. 0 7 1

, t h e t r i a l c o u r t

s e n t e n c e d A p p l i c a n t t o d e a t h

. O n J u n e 2 2

, 2 0 1 6

, t h e S t a t e f i l e d i n t h i s C o u r t i t s b r i e f o n 1

Unless otherw ise indicated, a ll refe renc es in this order to Ar ticles ref er to the Te x as 1

Code of Criminal Procedur e.Valdez - 2

A p p l i c a n t ’ s d i r e c t a p p e a l

. P u r s u a n t t o A r t i c l e 1 1

. 0 7 1 § § 4 ( a ) a n d ( b )

, a n d t w o m o t i o n s

f o r e x t e n s i o n f

i l e d p u r s u a n t t o A r t i c l e 1 1

. 0 7 1 § 4 A

, A p p l i c a n t ’ s i n i t i a l a p p l i c a t i o n f o r a

w r i t o f h a b e a s c o r p u s w a s d u e t o b e f i l e d i n t h e t r i a l c o u r t o n o r b e f o r e J u l y 2 8

, 2 0 1 7

. S e e

E x p a r t e V a l d e z

, N o

. W R

- 8 5

, 9 4 1

- 0 1 ( T e x

. C r i m

. A p p

. J u n e 2 8

, 2 0 1 7 ) ( n o t d e s i g n a t e d f o r

p u b l i c a t i o n )

.

I t h a s b e e n t h r e e a n d a h a l f y e a r s s i n c e t h e a p p l i c a t i o n w a s d u e i n t h e t r i a l c o u r t

.

A c c o r d i n g l y

, w e o r d e r t h e t r i a l c o u r t t o r e s o l v e a n y r e m a i n i n g i s s u e s i n t h e c a s e w i t h i n 6 0

d a y s f r o m t h e d a t e o f t h i s o r d e r

. T h e c l e r k s h a l l t h e n i m m e d i a t e l y t r a n s m i t t h e c o m p l e t e

w r i t r e c o r d t o t h i s C o u r t

. A n y e x t e n s i o n s o f t i m e s h a l l b e r e q u e s t e d b y t h e t r i a l j u d g e

, o r

o n h i s o r h e r b e h a l f

, a n d o b t a i n e d f

r o m t h i s C o u r t

.

I T I S S O O R D E R E D T H I S T H E 1 3 D A Y O F J A N U A R Y

, 2 0 2 1

. T H

D o N o t P u b l i s h
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification of CFO Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation for the quarter ended September30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),I, Andrea Tarbox, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of KapStone Paperand Packaging Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of KapStone Paper andPackaging Corporation.

 

Dated: November5, 2007

 

 
|   | By:                                        | /s/ Andrea Tarbox |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|-------------------|--------|
|   | Andrea Tarbox                              |
|   | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Editorial Note on Part 1942
Editorial Notes: Nomenclature changes to part 1942 appear at 80 FR 9878, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1942.128 Borrower accounting methods, management reports and audits. ( a ) Loans under this subpart are subject to the provisions of § 1942.17(q) of subpart A of this part 1942 except as provided in this section.
( b ) Borrowers with annual incomes not exceeding $100,000 may, with concurrence of the District Director, use Form RD 1942-53, “Cash Flow Report,” instead of page one of schedule one and schedule two of Form RD 442-2, “Statement of Budget, Income, and Equity.” When used for budgeting, the cash statement should be projected for the upcoming fiscal year. When used for quarterly or annual reports, the cash flow report should include current year projections and actual data for the prior year, the quarter just ended, and the current year to date.
Exhibit 10.15 
	 
	Summary of Director Compensation for Fiscal 2005
	 
	                Effective January 1, 2005, each member of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) who is not an employee of Tredegar or any of its subsidiaries will receive $1,500 for attendance at each Board meeting with respect to which such director participates. Each director who is a member of Tredegar’s Audit Committee, Executive Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee (the “Committees”), including the chairperson of each such Committee, will receive $1,250 for attendance at each meeting of the Committee with respect to which such director participates. 
	 
	                In addition to individual meeting fees, the chairpersons of such Committees will receive the following annual retainers, payable in equal quarterly installments commencing after their election to such position by the Board: 
	 


	 	Audit Committee Chairperson 	$	5,000	 
	 	Executive Compensation Committee Chairperson	$	2,000	 
	 	Nominating & Governance Committee Chairperson	$	2,000 	 


	 
	                John D. Gottwald, Chairman of the Board, does not receive the aforementioned retainer and meeting fees that are paid to members of Tredegar’s Board. As compensation for his advisory role and other significant contributions to Tredegar, as well as service as Chairman of the Board, Mr. Gottwald will receive a salary of $250,000 in 2005. In addition, in August 2004, the Executive Compensation Committee, as administrator of Tredegar’s 2004 Equity Incentive Plan, approved a stock award of 12,000 shares of Tredegar common stock that will be awarded to Mr. Gottwald on August 31, 2005, but will be granted and vest immediately if Mr. Gottwald dies or becomes disabled or if there is a
change of control of Tredegar before that date. The granting of this stock award, which
reflects the significant contributions that Mr. Gottwald has made and is expected to continue to make to Tredegar, is contingent upon Mr. Gottwald’s continued service as Chairman of the Board through August 2005. The award was reviewed by the Board.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2372 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act and the Controlled Substances 

Import and Export Act regarding penalties for cocaine offenses, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 13, 2013 

Mr. SCOTT of Virginia introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy 

and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act and the Controlled 

Substances Import and Export Act regarding penalties 

for cocaine offenses, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fairness in Cocaine 

5 Sentencing Act of 2013’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2372 IH

1 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF INCREASED PENALTIES FOR CO2 CAINE OFFENSES WHERE THE COCAINE IN3 VOLVED IS COCAINE BASE. 

4 (a) CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES ACT.—The following 

5 provisions of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 

6 801 et seq.) are repealed: 

7 (1) Clause (iii) of section 401(b)(1)(A). 

8 (2) Clause (iii) of section 401(b)(1)(B). 

9 (3) The sentence beginning ‘‘Notwithstanding 

10 the preceding sentence’’ in section 404(a). 

11 (b) CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES IMPORT AND EXPORT

12 ACT.—The following provisions of the Controlled Sub13 stances Import and Export Act (21 U.S.C. 951 et seq.) 

14 are repealed: 

15 (1) Subparagraph (C) of section 1010(b)(1). 

16 (2) Subparagraph (C) of section 1010(b)(2). 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### § 235.10 [Reserved]
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:98cr47LAC

THOMAS JEFFERSON BRELAND, III

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on March 28, 2006

Motion/Pleadings: TITLE 28 USCA § 2241 (A)(D) MOTION AND RULE 35(b) 

SUPPORTING BY TITLE 18 USCA § 3582 

Filed by DEFENDANT PRO SE on3/16/06 Doc.# 181

RESPONSES:

on Doc.#

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Mary Maloy

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 3rd day of

April, 2006, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) 

 s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 3:98-cr-00047-LC-MD Document 182 Filed 04/03/06 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Barry Hollingsworth, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The Parent Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other
certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                         |  |  |  |                        
|------------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: September 16, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Barry Hollingsworth
|                         |  |  |  | Barry Hollingsworth    
|                         |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="Corel WordPerfect 8">
<TITLE></TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY TEXT="#000000" LINK="#0000ff" VLINK="#551a8b" ALINK="#ff0000" BGCOLOR="#c0c0c0">

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><FONT SIZE="-1"></FONT><FONT SIZE="-1"><CENTER><STRONG>Consent Letter</STRONG></CENTER>
</FONT></P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><FONT SIZE="-1">We have issued our report dated June 25, 1999, accompanying the financial statements incorporated in the Annual
Report of Sepragen Corporation on Form 10-KSB for the years ended December 31, 1998 and 1997.  We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Sepragen Corporation on
Forms S-8 (File Nos. 33-95182 and 333-11903).</FONT></P>

<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<BR WP="BR1"><BR WP="BR2">
<P><FONT SIZE="-1">/s/ Grant Thornton LLP</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE="-1">San Jose, California</FONT></P>

<P><FONT SIZE="-1">June 25, 1999</FONT></P>

</BODY>
</HTML>
§ 25.301 Selection factors for designation of nominated rural areas. In choosing among nominated rural areas eligible for designation as Empowerment Zone, Enterprise Community or Champion Community, the Secretary shall consider: ( a ) The potential effectiveness of the strategic plan, in accordance with the key principles in § 25.202(a);
( b ) The strength of the assurances made pursuant to § 25.200(b) that the strategic plan will be implemented;
( c ) The extent to which an application proposes activities that are creative and innovative;
( d ) The extent to which areas consisting of noncontiguous parcels are not so widely separated as to compromise achievement by the nominated area of a cohesive community or regional identity; and
( e ) Such other factors as established by the Secretary, which include the degree of need demonstrated by the nominated area for assistance under this part and the diversity within and among the nominated areas. If other factors are established by USDA, a Federal Register Notice will be published identifying such factors, along with an extension of the application due date if necessary.
# Q Memorandu m

U.S . Departmen t o f Transportatio n Offic e o f th e Secretar

y o f Transportatio n Subject : Reques t

for Extensio n at

Jopli n (DOT-OST-2006

- Date : Jul y 30 , 201 0 23932 ) an dFor t

Leonar dWoo d(DOT-OST-1996-1167) , Missour i ^- ^ From : Denni s J . DeVany , Chie f Repl y t o Kevi n Schlemmer , EA S & Domesti c Analysi s Division , X-5 3 Attn , of : X-5 3 Ext . 6317 6 To : Docket s Operations , M-3 0

O n Jul y 26 , th e Departmen t requeste dcommunit y comment s i n respons e t o carrie r proposal s for

Essentia l Ai r

Servic e at

Jopli n an dFort

Leonar dWood , Missouri , b e submitte db y Augus t

9 . O n July-27 , w e receive dareques t for a n extensio n t o submi t

comment s fro mBruc e Harrill , City Administrato r for th e Cit y o f

Waynesville , Missouri , whic h ha s inpu t o n th e carrie r selectio n a

t Fort Leonar dWood . H e state s th e nex t airport boardmeetin g i s schedule dfor

Augus t 12 . H e request s a

n extensio n unti l Augus t

16 , s o th e Boar dha s th e opportunit y t o revie w th e proposal s an dsubmi t comments . W e ar e hereb y grantin g aone-wee k extensio n basedo n tha t

request . Comment s o n proposal s for

Jopli n an dFort

Leonar dWoo dar e no w du e n o late r tha n Augus t

16 , 2010 .
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

MCWENDELL WILSON,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 1:03-CV-0113SPM/AK

JOHNNY SMITH, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

AND DISMISSING CASE

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the magistrate judge's report

and recommendation (doc. 56) dated April 13, 2005. The parties have been

furnished a copy and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections. No

objections have been filed.

Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), I have

determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 56) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

Case 1:03-cv-00113-SPM-AK Document 57 Filed 05/23/05 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

 Case No.: 1:03-CV-113-SPM/AK

2. The motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies

(doc. 52) is granted.

3. This case is dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative

remedies pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997(e).

DONE AND ORDERED this twenty-third day of May, 2005.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

/pao

Case 1:03-cv-00113-SPM-AK Document 57 Filed 05/23/05 Page 2 of 2
#### § 28.425 Low Middling Spotted Color.

Low Middling Spotted Color is color which is within the range represented by a set of samples in the custody of the United States Department of Agriculture in a container marked “Original Official Cotton Standards of the United States, American Upland, Low Middling Spotted, effective July 1, 1987.”
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 2189** 

GENEVA B. LIVINGSTON , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro

. William L. Osteen, Jr. , Chief District Judge. ( 1:11

- cv - 00501

- WO

- JEP )

Submitted : August 28, 2015 Decided: September 9, 2015

Before NIEMEYER, KEENAN, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

William Lee Davis, III, Lumberton, North Carolina, for Appellant. Ripley Rand, United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina; Sarah Choi, Special Assistant United States Attorney, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION , Boston, Massachusetts, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Geneva B. Livingston appeals the district court’s order upholding the Commissioner’s denia l of Livingston’s application for disability benefits and supplemental security income. Our
review of the Commissioner’s determination is limited to evaluating whether the findings are supported by substantial evidence and whether the correct law was appl ied. See Mascio v.
Colvin , 780 F.3d 632, 634 (4th Cir. 2015). We have thoroughly reviewed the parties’ briefs, the administrative record, and the joint appendix, and we discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Livingston v. Colvin , No. 1:11

- cv - 00501 , 2014 WL 4850447 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 29, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisiona l process.

AFFIRMED
#### Mary Dremucha, as Committee of the Person and Property of John Dremucha, an Incompetent, et al., Respondents, et al., Plaintiff, v. City of New York, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered November 3, 1965, affirmed, with one bill of costs to respondents. No opinion. Christ, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ., concur; Beldock, P. J., and Ughetta, J., dissent and vote to reverse the judgment and to grant a new trial, unless the plaintiff committee stipulates to reduce the amount of the verdict for the incompetent from $221,000 to $100,000 and for entry of an amended judgment in accordance therewith, on the ground that such verdict was excessive to the extent indicated.
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Donald R. Chappel, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Williams Partners L.P.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) [Intentionally omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 34-47986];  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: November 2, 2006                                                       /s/ Donald R. Chappel   Donald R. Chappel   Chief Financial Officer of Williams Partners GP LLC,general partner of Williams Partners L.P.(Principal Financial Officer)  
51