alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN

NO. 03-0 7 -00 718 -CV

Cl iff Bur ke , A ppe lla nt

v. Texas Depart m ent of Fam ily and P rote ctive Service s , Appellee

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF WI LLIAM SO N COUNTY , 395TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 03- 1101 -F 395 , HO NORAB LE MI CHAEL JERGINS , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant Cliff B urke, a

ppear ing pr o se, is curr ently incar ce ra t ed in the Arizona Depa rtment of Corre ctions. Bur ke has not ma de arr ang ements to pa y for the cler

k’s rec ord, which
wa s d u e on De ce mb er 2 7 , 2 0 0 7 , n o r ha s h e pa i d t h e $1 7 5
. 0 0 fe e fo r fi l i n g a no t i ce o f ap p e a l
. In addition, Burke has not y et fil ed a docketing statement as r equire d by Texas Rule of Appellate Proc edure 32.1.

On Marc h 10, 2008, Bur

ke filed an aff

idavit of indige nce in this Court. See Te x. R. App. P. 20.1. Be cause the docketing statement and cler k’s rec ord have not be en filed, it is unclear whether Bur ke filed in the tria l court a state ment of points on which he intends to appe al, a motion for ne w trial, or a

n aff idavit of indige nce. See Tex. F am. Code Ann. § 263.405(b) (West Supp. 2007) (g overning appea ls f

rom termination order s). I t is also unclear whether the trial cour

t appointed anWhil e the f amily code d o es not specif

ically require appointed appe llate counse l for an 1 ind ig e nt pa

re nt, Te xas c ourt s have he ld t hat “ the ri g ht t o e ff

e c tiv e c ouns e l e xten ds to t he a pp e llate level” in ter

mination cases. In re K.K

. , 180 S.W .3d 681, 684 (Tex. App.—Waco 2005, no pet.).

2 attorney to r epre sent Bur

ke on appea l or held a hearingto determine w hether Bur ke wa s indige nt 1 or whe ther the a

ppeal wa s frivolous. See id. § 263.405(d), ( e). We a bate thi s c a

us e to t he tr ial c ourt

fo r a he ari ngto d e te rm ine wh e the r B ur ke is indige nt, as well as ot her require d deter minations under the family code. See Tex. F am. Code Ann. §§ 107.013, 263.405 (West Supp. 2007).

T h e t ri al co u rt i s o rd er edt o fo rw ar d a re co rd o f th e he ar i n g, i n cl u d i n g an y fi n d i n gs of fa c t and c on c lus ion s o f l aw, to t

his Court wi thi n 3 0 d ay s o f th e dat e of this o rd e r. I f B ur ke is
e nti tle d to and

de sir e s a pp oin te d c ouns e l, the tr ia l c ourt sh a ll m a ke that a

pp oin tme nt a

nd inf or m hi s attorney that the brief

is due wi t h i n s u ch time as the trial cour t determines is appr opriate f or the ci rc u m s t an ce s , b u t

n o l at er t h an 2 5 d ay s af

t er t h e t ri al co u rt ’s h ea ri n g.

__________________________________________ Diane H enson, Jus tice Be fore J ustices Patterson, Pury ear and He nson Abated Filed: Mar ch 21, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000793935
<NAME> NASHVILLE LAND FUND, LTD
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         153,732
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       4,066,832
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,220,840
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,536
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,188,304
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,220,840
<SALES>                                        107,812
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                48,475
<CGS>                                           48,686
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   65,970
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               983,890
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (935,416)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (935,416)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (935,416)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (124.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (124.72)
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 21, 2012 

h0514 

Order 

 

May 21, 2012 

144473 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 144473 

 COA: 307011 

Iosco CC: 10-006091-FH 

MATTHEW LUKE COLEMAN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 4, 2012 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Trust Floating Rate Common Securities



 Exhibit 4.2 
  

COMMON SECURITIES CERTIFICATE 
  
 THIS COMMON SECURITY HAS NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE 
 SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, OR ANY STATE SECURITIES LAWS OR 
 ANY OTHER APPLICABLE
SECURITIES LAWS AND MAY NOT BE OFFERED, 
 SOLD, PLEDGED OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED EXCEPT PURSUANT TO AN 
 EXEMPTION FROM REGISTRATION. THIS CERTIFICATE IS NOT 
 TRANSFERABLE EXCEPT IN COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAW AND 
 SECTION 5.11 OF THE TRUST AGREEMENT

  

			
	Certificate Number	 	Number of Common Securities
		
	        C-	 	1,130

  
 Certificate
Evidencing Common Securities 
  
 of 
  
 ANWORTH CAPITAL TRUST 1

  
 Floating Rate Common Securities 
  
 (liquidation amount $1,000 per Common Security) 
  
 Anworth Capital Trust 1, a statutory trust created under the laws of the State of Delaware
(the “Trust”), hereby certifies that Anworth Mortgage Asset Corporation, a Maryland corporation (the “Holder”) is the registered owner of One Thousand One Hundred Thirty (1,130) common securities of the Trust
representing undivided common beneficial interests in the assets of the Trust and designated the Anworth Capital Trust 1 Floating Rate Common Securities (liquidation amount $1,000 per Common Security) (the “Common Securities”).
Except in accordance with Section 5.11 of the Trust Agreement (as defined below), the Common Securities are not transferable and, to the fullest extent permitted by law, any attempted transfer hereof other than in accordance therewith shall
be void. The designations, rights, privileges, restrictions, preferences and other terms and provisions of the Common Securities are set forth in, and this certificate and the Common Securities represented hereby are issued and shall in all respects
be subject to the terms and provisions of, the Amended and Restated Trust Agreement of the Trust, dated as of March 15, 2005 as the same may be amended from time to time (the “Trust Agreement”), among Anworth Mortgage Asset
Corporation, as Depositor, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as Property Trustee, Chase Bank USA, National Association, as Delaware Trustee, the Administrative Trustees named therein and the Holders, from time to time, of Trust
Securities. The Trust will furnish a copy of the Trust Agreement to the Holder without charge upon written request to the Trust at its principal place of business or registered office. 
  
 Upon receipt of this certificate, the Holder is bound by the Trust Agreement and is entitled to the benefits thereunder. 







 This Common Securities Certificate shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of
Delaware. 
  
 Terms used but not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the
Trust Agreement. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, one of the Administrative Trustees of
the Trust has executed on behalf of the Trust this certificate this      day of March, 2005. 
  

			
	ANWORTH CAPITAL TRUST 1
		
	By:	 	  


	Name:	 	Lloyd McAdams
	 	 	Administrative Trustee
CONSENT
                                   
    
    
    We have issued our reports dated September 19, 1997, accompanying the
    consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of Wealth
    International, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the year ended February 28, 1997. 
    We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the
    Registration Statement of Wealth International, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No.
    333-14709, effective October 24, 1996).
    
    
         /s/ Grant Thornton LLP
                                       GRANT THORNTON LLP
                                            
    
    Provo, Utah
    September 19, 1997
113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2251 

AN ACT 

To designate the United States courthouse and Federal 

building located at 118 South Mill Street, in Fergus 

Falls, Minnesota, as the ‘‘Edward J. Devitt United 

States Courthouse and Federal Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2251 EH

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

2 The United States courthouse and Federal building 

3 located at 118 South Mill Street, in Fergus Falls, Min4 nesota, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Edward 

5 J. Devitt United States Courthouse and Federal Build6 ing’’. 

7 SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

8 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

9 paper, or other record of the United States to the United 

10 States courthouse and Federal building referred to in sec11 tion 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Edward 

12 J. Devitt United States Courthouse and Federal Build13 ing’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 28, 

2013. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2251 

AN ACT 

To designate the United States courthouse and 

Federal Building’’. ward J. Devitt United States Courthouse and Street, in Fergus Falls, Minnesota, as the ‘‘EdFederal building located at 118 South Mill
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
Jerry C. Atkin, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of SkyWest, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of and for the periods presented in this report.

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
February 26, 2008

|/s/JERRY C. ATKINJerry C. Atkin
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks
Amendment No. 1 to Retirement Agreement


 Exhibit 10.9 
  
 AMENDMENT TO 
 RETIREMENT AGREEMENT 
  
 THIS AMENDMENT TO
RETIREMENT AGREEMENT (“Amendment”) is entered into by and between Trico Marine Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Joseph S. Compofelice (“Director”) as of March 15, 2005. 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company and Director have heretofore entered into that
certain Retirement Agreement dated as of March 15, 2005 (the “Retirement Agreement”); and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Company and Director desire to amend the Retirement Agreement in certain respects in recognition of Director’s services to the
Company; 
  
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
premises set forth above and the mutual agreements set forth herein, the Company and Director hereby agree, effective as of the date first set forth above, that the Retirement Agreement shall be amended as hereafter provided: 
  
 1. The following new Section 2.C. shall be added immediately following
Section 2.B. of the Retirement Agreement: 
  
 C. Voluntary Termination of Services After Two Years: In the event that Director has continuously served as Chairman of the Board for two years following the date of execution of this Agreement, Director voluntarily
resigns from service as Chairman of the Board for any reason. 
  
 2. The effectiveness and terms of this Amendment shall be subject to the approval of the board of directors of Reorganized TMS (as such term is defined in the Joint Prepackaged Plan of Reorganization of Trico Marine Services, Inc., Trico
Marine Assets, Inc., and Trico Marine Operators, Inc. Under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, dated November 12, 2004). 
  
 3. This Amendment (a) shall supersede any prior agreement between the Company and Director relating to the subject matter of this Amendment and (b) shall
be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and any successors to the Company and all persons lawfully claiming under Director. 
  
 4. Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, the terms of the Retirement Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and are hereby confirmed
and ratified. 






 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and delivered this Amendment as of the date
first set forth above. 
  

			
	 TRICO MARINE SERVICES, INC

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Thomas E. Fairley


	 Name:
	 	 Thomas E. Fairley

	 Title:
	 	 President and Chief Executive Officer

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Joseph S. Compofelice


	 Name:
	 	 JOSEPH S. COMPOFELICE



  

 -2-
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 7, 2020

Order 

Clerk

January 7, 2020

160034(41)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 160034

v COA: 345268

Saginaw CC: 84-000570-FC

ROBIN RICK MANNING, Defendant-Appellant. 

_______________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of defendant-appellant to extend the time 

for filing his supplemental brief is GRANTED. The supplemental brief will be accepted 

as timely filed if submitted on or before March 9, 2020.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2175 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2175

 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to install in the area of the 
World War II Memorial in the District of Columbia a suitable plaque or 
  an inscription with the words that President Franklin D. Roosevelt 
  prayed with the United States on June 6, 1944, the morning of D-Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2013

 Mr. Johnson of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to install in the area of the 
World War II Memorial in the District of Columbia a suitable plaque or 
  an inscription with the words that President Franklin D. Roosevelt 
  prayed with the United States on June 6, 1944, the morning of D-Day.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``World War II Memorial Prayer Act of 
2013''.

SEC. 2. PLACEMENT OF PLAQUE OR INSCRIPTION AT WORLD WAR II MEMORIAL.

    The Secretary of the Interior--
            (1) shall install in the area of the World War II Memorial 
        in the District of Columbia a suitable plaque or an inscription 
        with the words that President Franklin D. Roosevelt prayed with 
        the United States on June 6, 1944, the morning of D-Day;
            (2) shall design, procure, prepare, and install the plaque 
        or inscription referred to in paragraph (1); and
            (3) may not use Federal funds to prepare or install the 
        plaque or inscription referred to in paragraph (1), but may 
        accept and expend private contributions for this purpose.

SEC. 3. COMMEMORATIVE WORKS ACT.

    Chapter 89 of title 40, United States Code (commonly known as the 
``Commemorative Works Act''), shall apply to the design and placement 
of the plaque within the area of the World War II Memorial.
                                 <all>
```
M. P. No. 79-286.

#### Diana Maggs, p.p.a. *et al. v.*The Westerly Hospital *et al.*

*Higgins, Cavanagh & Cooney, Gerald C. DeMaria, Albert R. Romano,*for petitioners. *Robert W. Lovegreen, Joseph A. Kelly, Martin K. Donovan, James T. Murphy,*for respondents.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.
#### § 29.3007 Buff color (L).

A light yellow slightly shaded toward red.

[24 FR 8771, Oct. 29, 1959; 24 FR 9121, Nov. 10, 1959. Redesignated at 49 FR 16757, Apr. 20, 1984]
#### Victor A. Dorsey and Company and Victor A. Dorsey for use of Eli H. Brown, Jr., appellees, v. Central Republic Trust Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 37,342.

Opinion filed October 16, 1934.

Arthur J. Hughes, for appellant; R. A. Bullinger and Joseph A. Greaves, of counsel. Nat M. Kahn and Townley, Wild, Campbell & Clark, for certain appellees; Nat M. Kahn, Glenn G. Paxton and Richard C. Bleloch, of counsel.

Mr. Presiding Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### In the Matter of Frederick G. Ziehm, Attorney, Respondent. Committee on Professional Standards, Third Judicial Department, Petitioner.

— Motion by respondent to reopen proceeding denied, temporary stay vacated and respondent’s suspension, pursuant to order entered August 20, 1980 [77 AD2d 958], directed to commence November 1, 1980. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Kane and Casey, JJ., concur.
April 29, 2010 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: Changes to background document Preliminary Review of Environmental Justice 

Impacts Resulting from OMB Comments 

FROM: Marc Thomas 

Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery 

TO: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329 

The attached document is a copy of the Preliminary Review of Environmental Justice Impacts,

which illustrates the changes EPA made to the document as a result of the review by the Office 

of Management and Budget (OMB). Changes made pursuant to OMB comments are identified 

by comment highlighted changes. Additional changes throughout the document were made 

based on internal discussion. This redlined/strikeout copy resulted from a comparison of the 

final version sent to OMB with the version EPA originally sent to OMB for review (4-13-10). 

Conforming changes were made to other Environmental Justice-related materials. A final 

“clean” version of this document is also located in the docket for today’s rule. 

Attachment
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-14-00094-CR

Joshua Joel LALUZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of TexasAppellee

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR1397A

Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 9, 2014

DISMISSED

Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, appellant Joshua Joel Laluz pleaded guilty to the 

offense of human trafficking of a person under the age of eighteen for the purpose of prostitution. 

As part of his plea-bargain, appellant signed a separate “Waiver of Appeal.” The trial court 

imposed sentence and signed a certificate stating that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant 

has NO right of appeal” and “the defendant has waived the right of appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P.

25.2(a)(2). After appellant timely filed a notice of appeal, the clerk sent copies of the certification 

and notice of appeal to this court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(e). The clerk’s record, which includes 
04-14-00094-CR

the plea bargain agreement and the trial court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2) certification, has been filed. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). 

The clerk’s record establishes the punishment assessed by the trial court does not exceed 

the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 25.2(a)(2). After reviewing the clerk’s record, the trial court’s certification therefore appears to 

accurately reflect that this is a plea bargain case and Laluz does not have a right to appeal. See 

Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that court of appeals should 

review clerk’s record to determine whether trial court’s certification is accurate). This court must 

dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been 

made part of the record.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

On February 14, 2014, we gave appellant notice that the appeal would be dismissed unless 

written consent to appeal and an amended certification showing appellant has the right to appeal 

were signed by the trial judge and made part of the appellate record by March 17, 2014. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order), 

disp. on merits, No. 04-03-00176-CR, 2003 WL 21508347 (Tex. App.—San Antonio July 2, 2003, 

pet. ref’d) (not designated for publication). Neither written permission to appeal nor an amended 

certification showing appellant has the right to appeal has been filed. We therefore dismiss this 

appeal. 

PER CURIAM

Do Not Publish

- 2 -
Case 1:91-cr-01032-MW-GRJ   Document 846   Filed 11/07/11   Page 1 of 1