alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 ... S eeTe x. R. App . P. 47. 4. 

## COURT OFAPPEALS SECOND DISTRICTOF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2 - 09 - 31 0- CV F E L I CI A L I NDA F I T Z GE R AL D AP P E L L ANT V . ERN EST JO H N SPI D ELL A PPELL EE

----- ----- FR O M THE 3 25TH DI STRI CT CO URT O F TARRA NT CO UN TY

----- ----- -- 

### MEMORANDU M OPI NI ON 1 

### AND J UDGME NT

----- ----- -- O n S e p tem b e r 1 5 , 2 0 0 9 a n d S e p tem b e r 2 9 , 2 0 0 9 , w e n o ti fi e d ap p e l l a n t, i n accor dance w i t h r ul e of appel l at e pr ocedu r e 42 . 3( c) , t hat w e w oul d di sm i ss th i s a p p e a l u n l e s s th e $ 1 7 5 fi l i n g fe e w a s p a i d . S eeT e x . R . A p p . P . 4 2 .3 (c ). A p p e l l a n t h a s n o t p a i d th e $ 1 7 5 fi l i n g fe e . S eeT e x . R . A p p . P . 5 , 1 2 .1 (b ).2 ... S eeS u p re m e C o u rt o f T e x ., O rde r R eg a rd in gFe e s Ch a r

g e d in Civil Cases i n the S uprem e C our tan d the C our ts of A ppeal s and B ef ore the Judi

ci al Panel on M ulti

di str i ct Liti gati on , M i s c . Doc k e t No. 07- 9138 ( Aug. 2 8, 2007 ) (l i s ti n g fe e s i n c o u rts o f a p p e a l s ). 2 Beca us e appe l l anthas f ai l ed t o com pl y w i t h a r equ i r em entof t he r ul es of a pp e l l a t e p r oc e du r e a nd t he Te xa s Su pr e m e Cou r t ’ s or de ro f Aug us t 28, 2007 , 2 w e d i s m i s s th e a p p e a l . S eeT e x . R . A p p . P . 4 2 .3 (c ), 4 3 .2 (f). A ppel l ant shal l pay al l cost s of t hi s appeal , f orw hi ch l et execut i on i ssue. S eeTe x. R. App . P. 43. 4.

P E R CU R I AM PA N EL: W A LKER, M C C O Y, an d M EI ER, JJ. DEL I VERE D: Oct ob e r22, 2009
#### § 29.3010 Color.

The third factor of a grade, based on the relative hues, saturations or chroma, and color values common to the type.

[24 FR 8771, Oct. 29, 1959. Redesignated at 49 FR 16757, Apr. 20, 1984]
COMMITTEE S 

BANKIN G a INSURANCE, CHAIRMA N 

TRANSPORTATION, VICE CHAIRMA N 

COMMUNITY a ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 

ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES a ENERGY 

LABOR a INDUSTRY 

VETERANS' AFFAIRS a EMERGENCY 

PREPAREDNESS 

State Senator 

Don White 

41st Senatorial District 

PA INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT 

AUTHORITY (PENNVEST) 

SOUTHWESTERN PA VETERANS' CENTER 

ADVISORY COUNCI L 

SENATE BOX 2O3041 

THE STATE CAPITOL 

HARRISBURG. PA 17120-3041 

717-787-8724 

FAX: 717-772-1B89 

6 1 8 PHILADELPHIA STREET 

INDIANA, PA 1S701 

724-3S7-OI51 

FAX: 724-3S7-0148 

(TOLL FREE) 866-3S7-01S1 

Senate at Penttayluanm 

July 21, 2011 

Aloha Ley 

Associate Director 

Small Community Air Service Development Program, X-55 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: Westmoreland County Airport Authority's Funding Request 

t O I MARKET STREET 

SUITE 100 

KITTANNING, PA 16201 

724-543-3026 

FAX: 724-548-4856 

395 0 WILLIA M PENN HIGHWAY 

MURRYSVILLE, PA 15668 

724-327-2422 

FAX: 724-327-2436 

NJ 

i-ri-'-;i-n 

Dear Ms. Ley: 

I am writing to lend my support to the Westmoreland County Airport Authority's request 

for funding through the U.S. Department of Transportation's Small Community Air Service 

Development program to expand the scheduled air service that has shown phenomenal promise 

at Arnold Palmer Regional Airport. 

The Authority has seen dramatic success with the launch of Spirit Airlines service to Fort 

Lauderdale, FL and Myrtle Beach, SC, which has moved more than 30,000 passengers through 

Arnold Palmer Airport in less than 5 months. The airline is now considering additional 

destinations to augment this thriving operation, and asks only for assistance in marketing the new 

routes. 

These efforts are heavily dependent upon marketing efforts that the airline has proven 

successful. Grant funding through the SCASD program is critical to supporting these efforts to 

expand service and bolster a priceless economic asset to the communities the airport serves. 

Your favorable review of this application would be greatly appreciated. Should you have 

any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me or my Westmoreland County office at your 

convenience. 

Sincerely, 

Don White 

Senator, 41" District
#### § 301.38 Notice of quarantine; restrictions on interstate movement of regulated articles.

The conterminous 48 States and the District of Columbia are quarantined in order to prevent the spread of black stem rust. No person shall move interstate any regulated article except in accordance with this subpart.[1]

[54 FR 32791, Aug. 10, 1989, as amended at 66 FR 21050, Apr. 27, 2001]

###### Footnotes -
  301.38

[1] Any properly identified employee of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service is authorized to stop and inspect persons and means of conveyance, and to seize, quarantine, treat, apply other remedial measures to destroy, or otherwise dispose of regulated articles as provided in sections 414 and 421 of the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7714 and 7731).
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-30193 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. JAMES GODWIN Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:06-CR-64-1
Before REAVLEY, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * JamesGodwin appealshissentencefollowing hisguilty plea conviction for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. Godwin argues that the district court erred by applying an enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(6) for using or possessing a firearm in connection with another felony offense. He assertsthat therewas insufficient evidence that hewas involved in the burglary that resulted in the theft of the firearm he possessed. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D September 23, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 08-30193

2 A “district court may adopt facts contained in a PSR without inquiry, so long as the facts have an adequate evidentiary basis and the defendant does not present rebuttal evidence.” U nited States v. Caldwell , 448 F.3d 287, 290 (5th Cir. 2006). The presentence report (PSR) relied on investigations by the Jefferson Parish Sheriff’s Office and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, which included a statement from another participant in the burglary describing Godwin’s role in that offense. This court has held that even uncorroborated hearsay evidence issuf ficiently reliable for sentencing purposes. See United States v. West, 58 F.3d 133, 138 (5th Cir. 1995). Godwin did not present sufficient evidence to rebut the facts stated in the PSR. It is the defendant’s burden to show that the information in the PSR is materially untrue, United States v. Betancourt, 422 F.3d 240, 248 (5th Cir. 20 05), and absent rebuttal evidence, the district court is entitled to rely on the facts stated in the PSR. U nited Statesv. DeJesus-Batres, 410 F.3d 154, 164 (5th Cir. 2005). As the district court’s factual determination was not implausible in light ofthe record as a whole, Godwin has not shown that the district court clearly erred by applying the enhancement. See Caldwell , 448 F.3d at 290. AFFIRMED.
#### § 29.3515 Dirty.

The state of tobacco containing an abnormal amount of dirt or sand, or tobacco to which additional quantities of dirt or sand have been added. (See Rule 24, § 29.3625.)
Case 3:20-cv-04698-TKW-HTC Document 11 Filed 04/09/20 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:20-cv-04698-TKW-HTC Document 11 Filed 04/09/20 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:20-cv-04698-TKW-HTC Document 11 Filed 04/09/20 Page 3 of 3
# C_2022036EN.01006001.xml

| 24.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/60

---

Corrigendum to Statement of revenue and expenditure of the Fusion for Energy Joint Undertaking (F4E) for the financial year 2021

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 485 of 2 December 2021
  )

(2022/C 36/10)

On page 4, Expenditure, Chapter 1 9, Title 1:

for:

| ‘Title
  Chapter | Heading | Appropriations 2021 | Appropriations 2020 | Outturn 2019 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Commitments | Payments | Commitments | Payments | Commitments | Payments |
| [...] | [...] | | | | | | |
| 1 9 | OTHER STAFF EXPENDITURE | 2 828 000 ,— | 2 828 000 ,— | 2 694 411,41 | 3 017 657,31 | 2 521 038,32 | 2 452 872,87 ’ |

‘Title

Chapter

Heading

Appropriations 2021

Appropriations 2020

Outturn 2019

Commitments

Payments

Commitments

Payments

Commitments

Payments

[...]

[...]

1 9

OTHER STAFF EXPENDITURE

2 828 000 ,—

2 828 000 ,—

2 694 411,41

3 017 657,31

2 521 038,32

2 452 872,87 ’

read:

| ‘Title
  Chapter | Heading | Appropriations 2021 | Appropriations 2020 | Outturn 2019 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Commitments | Payments | Commitments | Payments | Commitments | Payments |
| [...] | [...] | | | | | | |
| 1 9 | OTHER STAFF EXPENDITURE | 2 828 000 ,— | 2 828 000 ,— | 2 694 441,41 | 3 017 657,31 | 2 521 038,32 | 2 452 872,87 ’ |

‘Title

Chapter

Heading

Appropriations 2021

Appropriations 2020

Outturn 2019

Commitments

Payments

Commitments

Payments

Commitments

Payments

[...]

[...]

1 9

OTHER STAFF EXPENDITURE

2 828 000 ,—

2 828 000 ,—

2 694 441,41

3 017 657,31

2 521 038,32

2 452 872,87 ’

---
1 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 9/26/96 FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
M.M., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,

Plaintiff-Appellant,
v. ARISTEDES W. ZAVARAS, Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections, in his official capacity,

Defendant-Appellee. No. 96-1416 (D.C. No. 96-WM-2010) (D. Colo.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT 1 Before PORFILIO and HENRY, Circuit Judges.

After examining the documents filed in connection w ith this appeal, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argumentwould not materially assist2 -2- the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without ora l argument. Appellant has filed with this court an emergency ap plication for stay pending appeal of the denial of her motion to proce ed in pseudonym. Because this is not a final, appealable order, we decline t o rule on the application, Desktop Direct , Inc. v. Digital Equipment Corp . 993 F.2d 755, 760 (10th Cir. 1993), and the appeal is dismissed for lack of juri sdiction. Id. DISMISSED.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT PER CURIAM
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2284 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2284

To amend title 4, United States Code, to authorize members of the Armed 
 Forces not in uniform and veterans to render a military salute during 
              the recitation of the pledge of allegiance.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 6, 2013

  Mr. Terry introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 4, United States Code, to authorize members of the Armed 
 Forces not in uniform and veterans to render a military salute during 
              the recitation of the pledge of allegiance.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MILITARY SALUTE DURING RECITATION OF PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE BY 
              MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES NOT IN UNIFORM AND BY 
              VETERANS.

    Section 4 of title 4, United States Code, is amended by adding at 
the end the following new sentence: ``Members of the Armed Forces not 
in uniform and veterans may render the military salute in the manner 
provided for persons in uniform.''.
                                 <all>
```
CONSENTS OF EXPERTS AND COUNSEL


Chavez & Koch
2920 North Green Valley Parkway
Building 8, Suite 821
Henderson, NV 89014

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
Board of Directors

Nutek, Inc. (The Company)
1110 Mary Crest Road
Henderson, Nevada 89074

April 15, 2002

To Whom It May Concern:

Chavez & Koch, CPA's, Ltd.,  consents to the inclusion of our report of April
15, 2002 on the Financial Statements of Nutek Inc., as of December 31, 2001,
in any filings that are necessary now or in the near future with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission.

Very Truly yours,

/s/  Chavez & Koch, CPA's, Ltd.
--------------------------------
Chavez & Koch, CPA's, Ltd.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                                 Subsidiaries of
                        STERLING CHEMICALS HOLDINGS, INC.
                            As of September 30, 2001

Owns 100% of:

     Sterling Chemicals, Inc., a Delaware corporation

          Owns 100% of:

          Sterling Fibers, Inc., a Delaware corporation

          Sterling Chemicals Acquisitions, Inc., a Delaware corporation

               Owns 100% of:

               Sterling Pulp Chemicals Fuzhou, Ltd., an Ontario corporation

               Sterling Australian Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation

               Sterling (Sask) Holdings Ltd., an Ontario corporation

                    Owns 100% of:

                    Sterling Pulp Chemicals (Sask) Ltd., an Ontario corporation

                            Owns 100% of

                            619220 Saskatchewan Ltd., a Saskatchewan corporation

          Sterling Chemicals International, Inc., a Delaware corporation

          Sterling Chemicals Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation

          Sterling Chemicals Marketing, Inc., a Barbados corporation

          Sterling Canada, Inc., a Delaware corporation

                    Owns 100% of:

                    Sterling Pulp Chemicals US, Inc., a Delaware corporation

                            Owns 100% of:

                            Sterling Pulp Chemicals, Inc., a Georgia corporation

                    Sterling NRO, Ltd., an Ontario corporation

                    Sterling Pulp Chemicals, Ltd., an Ontario corporation
Page 1 of 2

Case No.: 3:20cv2335/MCR/EMT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

KIMBERLY KAYE SELBY,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:20cv2335/MCR/EMT

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, 

Acting Commissioner of Social Security,1

 Defendant.

 /

ORDER

The Chief Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation on

September 23, 2021 (ECF No. 18). The parties were furnished a copy of the Report 

and Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 

28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). There are no timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the record, I have 

determined the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The Chief Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 

1 Kilolo Kijakazi became the Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration on July 

9, 2021. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d), she is automatically substituted for Andrew Saul as 

the Defendant in the case. 

Case 3:20-cv-02335-MCR-EMT Document 19 Filed 10/29/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No.: 3:20cv2335/MCR/EMT

18) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the decision of the 

Commissioner is REVERSED, and the Commissioner is ordered to remand this case 

to the Administrative Law Judge for further proceedings consistent with this Report 

and Recommendation.

3. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this 

order and close the case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 29th day of October 2021.

M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-02335-MCR-EMT Document 19 Filed 10/29/21 Page 2 of 2
STATE UF MAINE. 

+^1 Crr,^ OFFICE oF T'HL GUVERNOR 

I S'TATE HOUSE STATIC)N 

. 

^^..^yqct^^ ^

AUGUSTA, MAINF. 

04 3 3 3-000 1 

Paul R. LePage 

GOVLIINOR 

July 23, 2013 

Mr. Robert Perciasepe 

Acting Administrator 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

401 M Street, SW 

Washington, DC 20460 

Dear Mr. Perciasepe: 

On June 11, 2013, Maine enacted legislation calling for the use of reformulated gasoline (RFG) 

in York, Cumberland, Sagadahoc, Androscoggin, Kennebec, Knox and Lincoln counties beginning May 

1, 2014. Pursuant to section 211(k)(6)(B) of the Clean Air Act, I hereby formally request that the 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency extend the requirement for the sale of RFG to these counties 

beginning on this date. 

Implementation of the RFG program in Maine's southern counties will provide additional 

nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds emission reductions that will facilitate Maine's 

efforts to maintain the federal ground level ozone standards while also reducing emissions of 

toxic compounds such as benzene. In addition to providing air quality benefits, RFG will 

remove the need for a"boutique" fuel, thereby improving stability in the marketplace by 

reducing costs to consumers and simplifying gasoline supply and distribution efforts in Maine. 

I am also asking that the existing 7.8 Reid Vapor Pressure fuel requirements for these counties be 

removed from the Maine State Implementation Plan (SIP), and be replaced with the new RFG 

requirement. Maine plans to subsequently amend its Chapter 119 Motor Vehicle Fuel Volatility 

Limit rule and submit it as a SIP revision upon the granting of this request 

Thank you for your attention to this matter, and I look forward to the successful implementation 

of the RFG program in southern Maine. If you have any questions regarding this requdst, please 

contact Ms. Patricia W. Aho, Commissioner of the Maine Department of Environmental 

Protection at 207 287-2812. 

Sincerely, 

Paul R, LePage 

Governor

^•«^ 

PRiN I)T ON RI?<, Cl YJ, (',, P1:1t 

PHONE: (207) 287-3531 (Voice) TTY USERS CALL 711 FAX: (207) 287•1034

www.mainr.gov
#### § 27.40 New certificates; conditions of issuance.

For the business convenience of a holder of a cotton class certificate issued under this subpart a new certificate may be issued at the request of the holder, to take the place of the former certificate without the reclassification of the cotton and without a new Micronaire determination for the cotton. In any case where a new certificate is issued in accordance with this section, the former certificate shall be surrendered for cancellation, and such new certificate shall bear a new number, the date of its issuance, and the date of original certification, and shall otherwise comply with this subpart.
exv10w13w1



 





Exhibit 10.13.1




AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




     THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made the 15th
day of November, 2003, by and between ENCORE MEDICAL CORPORATION, a Delaware
corporation, with its principal office located at 9800 Metric Boulevard,
Austin, Texas 78758 (the “Company”) and HARRY L. ZIMMERMAN, an individual
residing at 2628 Barton Hills Drive, Austin, Texas 78704 (the “Employee”).



     WHEREAS, the Employee and the Company entered into an Employment Agreement
dated June 12, 2001 (the “Agreement”);



     WHEREAS, the Employee and the Company desire that there be certain changes
made with respect to the Agreement; and



     WHEREAS, the Employee and the Company want to memorialize in this
Amendment their agreements regarding such changes to the Agreement.



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and other mutual promises
and covenants contained in this Amendment and for other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the
parties, intending legally to be bound, agree as follows:




	1.	 	The term of the Agreement is hereby extended to December 31,
2006.
	 
	2.	 	Except as specifically changed by this Amendment, all other
terms and provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed by
its duly authorized officer and the Employee has hereto set his/her hand as
of the date and year first above written.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	COMPANY:
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	ENCORE MEDICAL CORPORATION
	 
	 	 	 	 
	

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Kenneth W. Davidson
	

	 	 	 	

	

	 	 	 	Kenneth W. Davidson, Chief Executive Officer
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	EMPLOYEE:
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/ Harry L. Zimmerman
	 	 	

	 	 	HARRY L. ZIMMERMAN
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

######  Office of the Secretary

          - [Docket No. DOT-OST-2010-0025]

# ACTION:

Notice; Correction

# SUMMARY:

                        In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501*et seq.*), the Department published a 60-Day notice on February 2, 2010 (75 FR 5369) and a subsequent notice (“30-Day notice”) on June 25, 2010 (75 FR 36463). As noted in both notices, the Department incorrectly estimated a total of 1,057 respondents and annual burden of 1,311,000 hours. The Department also provided the incorrect address for which the public should request further information related to the relevant Information Collection Request. The Department is correcting the documents as set forth below.                    

## Correction

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Robert C. Ashby, Office of the Secretary, Office of Assistant General Counsel for Regulation and Enforcement, Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-9310 (voice) (202) 366-9313 (fax) or at                         *bob.ashby@dot.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

*Number of Respondents:*                     1,250.                

*Frequency of Response:*                     Once/twice a year.                

*Estimated Total Burden on Respondents:*                     9,000 hours.                

Authority:The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended; and 49 CFR 1:48.

Issued in Washington, DC, on November 10, 2010.

Patricia Lawton,

Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief Information Officer.

[FR Doc. 2010-28776 Filed 11-15-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P