alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-146790) of our report dated May 26, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial schedule of China Natural Resources, Inc. and subsidiaries (which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph describing that the Company has significant transactions and relationships with affiliated companies; an explanatory paragraph stating that in 2009, the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Newhold Investments Limited and Pineboom Investment Limited, and sold its remaining 60% interest in Mark Faith Technology Development Limited, and in 2010, the Company sold its 45% equity interest in Guangdong Longchuan Jinshi Mining Development Co., Ltd., and acquired all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Wealthy Year Limited; and an explanatory paragraph stating that the Company adopted the provisions of new accounting standards relating to business combinations and non-controlling interests), and the effectiveness of China Natural Resources, Inc.s internal control over financial reporting, which appears on page F-3 in the 2009 Annual Report on Form 20-F of China Natural Resources, Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2009, and to the reference to our Firm under the caption Experts in the Prospectus.





/s/ GHP Horwath, P.C.

Denver, Colorado

May 26, 2010
NON-RECOURSE SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE
          ------------------------------------

$277,805.07                                   June 11, 1999


        FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Bruce C. Galton (the "Maker")
hereby promises to pay to the order of Cistron Biotechnology,
Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Cistron"), at Cistron's principal
offices at 10 Bloomfield Avenue, Pine Brook, New Jersey 07058,
or such other address as Cistron shall have given to the maker,
the principal sum of Two hundred Seventy Seven Thousand Eight
Hundred and Five ($277,805.07) Dollars and Seven Cents on the
earliest of June 10, 2002, the merger or sale of Cistron, or the
liquidation or dissolution of Cistron,

        Payments shall be made in such currency of the United
States as at the time of payment shall be legal tender for the
payment of public and private debts.

        This Note evidences the Loan made by Cistron under the
Loan and Pledge Agreement dated the date hereof (the
"Agreement") between Cistron and the Maker providing, among
other things, for the securing of the Note by a pledge of the
Shares, for the prepayment of this Note and for the acceleration
of the maturity of this Note following an Event of Default, all
on the terms set forth in the Agreement.

        This Note may be prepaid, in whole or in part, at any
time and from time to time without premium.  This Note shall be
paid without deduction by reason of any set-off, defense or
counterclaim of the Maker.

        Upon any sale of the Shares, this Note shall become
due and payable as set forth in the Agreement.  In addition,
upon the occurrence of an Event of Default (as defined in the
Agreement), this Note shall become due and payable as set forth
in the Agreement.

        The Maker does not assume any personal liability or
responsibility for the failure to pay the principal amount of
this Note.  The sole remedy available upon such failure shall be to

<PAGE> 2

proceed against the Collateral in accordance with the terms
of the Agreement.

        The maker hereby forever waives presentment, demand,
presentment for payment, protest, notice of protest, notice of
dishonor of this Note and all other demands and notices in
connection with the delivery, acceptance, performance and
enforcement of this Note.

        This Note shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of New Jersey and shall be
binding upon the heirs or legal representatives of the Maker and
shall inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of
Cistron.

                                	/s/BRUCE C. GALTON
                                 ------------------
                             				   BRUCE C. GALTON
2005-2134.

#### Preferred Capital, Inc. v. Power Eng. Group, Inc.

Summit App. Nos. 22475, 22476, 22477, 22478, 22485, 22486, 22487, 22488, 22489, 22497, 22499, 22506 and 22513,163 Ohio App.3d 522, 2005-Ohio-5113. On motion for admission pro hac vice of Geoffrey G. Why by Victoria Barto for amicus curiae Attorney General of Massachusetts. Motion granted.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS  ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Robert M. Brown, Chief Financial Officer of BabyUniverse, Inc. (the “Company”) in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge: 

(1)     the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2)     the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 9th day of September 2004. 

|   |   | */s/ Robert M. Brown*     |
|--------|--------|---------------------------|
|   |   |                           |
|   |   | *Robert M. Brown*         |
|   |   | Chief   Financial Officer |

23

----
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Report of China Runji Cement Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Shouren Zhao, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:








1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.











/s/Shouren
Zhao


Shouren
Zhao


Chief
Executive Officer





July 15,
2009
#### § 29.2619 Rule 3.

In drawing an official sample from a hogshead or other package of tobacco, two or more breaks shall be made at such points and in such manner as the inspector or sampler may find necessary to determine the kinds of tobacco and the percentage of each kind contained in the lot. All breaks shall be made so that the tobacco contained in the center of the package is visible to the sampler. Tobacco shall be drawn from at least two breaks from which a representative sample shall be selected.
98-20.

#### State v. Nields.

Hamilton C.P. No. B9703305. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Hamilton County. On October 9, 1998, appellant filed his second stipulation to an extension of time to file his merit brief. Whereas S.CtPrac.R. XIV(3)(B)(2) permits each party to obtain only one extension of time,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that appellant’s second stipulation to an extension of time to file his merit brief be, and hereby is, stricken.
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 9, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 13568]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-04814]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIDDK Consortium Review.
    Date: March 24, 2021.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 
Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Elena Sanovich, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, 
6707 Democracy Boulevard, Room 7351, Bethesda, MD 20892-2542, 301-
594-8886, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#2457454a4b524d474c416449454d480a4a4d4c0a434b52"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5023313e3f2639333835103d31393c7e3e39387e373f26">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 3, 2021.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-04814 Filed 3-8-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 10.6
 CONSULTANT AGREEMENT
 st
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS,
 NOW, THEREFORE,
 Scope of Hire and Term.
  Compensation and Term.
 
 Page 1 of 4




---



##### 



Independent Contractor Status.
 Confidentiality.
 
 Page 2 of 4




---



##### 



Inventions.
 Release and Indemnity.
 Effect on Existing Agreements.
 Enforcement.
  
 Page 3 of 4




---



##### 



Assignment
 Termination, Damages and Remedies
 Entire Agreement as to Post-Separation Consulting.
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
 American Commercial Lines LLCWitness:By:
    
    /s/ Richard M. Bruns
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Richard W. SpriggleName:
    
    Rich  Bruns
    
    Name:
    
    Richard W. SpriggleIts:
    
    Director, Compensation & Benifits
    
    Its:
    
    SVP Human ResourcesDate:
    
    6/26/09
    
    Date:
    
    6/26/09W. Norbert WhitlockWitness:By:
    
    /s/ Richard M. Bruns
    
    By:
    
    /s/ W. Norbert WhitlockName:
    
    Rich Bruns
    
    Name:
    
    W. Norbert WhitlockDate:
    
    6/26/09
    
    Date:
    
    6/26/09
 
 Page 4 of 4
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5 the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-30861

Summary Calendar

 

MYRTLE M. ROBINSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 98-CV-1287

 

June 6, 2000

Before GARWOOD, BENAVIDES and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Myrtle M. Robinson appeals the district court’s affirmance

of the Social Security Commissioner’s denial of supplemental

security income. She contends that the Administrative Law

Judge’s (ALJ) finding that her nonexertional mental impairment

was non-severe violated the remand order of the Appeals Council,

contravenes governing case law, and is not supported by the
2

evidence. Robinson also avers that the ALJ failed to combine her

mental impairment with her other impairments found severe at Step

2 of the sequential process and erred by relying solely on the

Medical Vocational Guidelines to deny benefits at Step 5 of the

sequential process.

Based upon a careful review of the record, the briefs, and

applicable law, we conclude both that there was substantial

evidence in the record to support the Commissioner’s decision

that Robinson was not disabled at any point during the relevant

period and that the Commissioner used proper legal standards in

evaluating the evidence. See villa v. Sullivan, 895 F.2d 1019,

1021 (5th Cir. 1990). The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 02920**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 02920\02920_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

02920\02920_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 02920\02920_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 02920\02920_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 02920\02920_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 02920\02920_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 02920\02920_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 02920\02920_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

02920\Certification Statement Plant ID 02920.pdf Plant certification statement 02920\Supplemental Documents\02920_Part A A5-2 Map-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 02920\Supplemental Documents\02920_Part A A5-2 Map-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 02920\Supplemental Documents\02920_Part A A5-2 Map-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 02920\Supplemental Documents\02920_Part A A5-2 Map-4.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 02920\Supplemental Documents\02920_Part A A5-2 Map-5.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 02920\Supplemental Documents\02920_Part A A5-2 Map-6.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 02920\Supplemental Documents\02920_Part A A5-3 WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 02920\Supplemental Documents\02920_Part A A5-3 WB-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 02920\Supplemental Documents\02920_Part A A5-3 WB-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1389 

To provide the Secretary of Energy with the authority to enter into contracts 

and cooperative agreements to improve the resilience of defense critical 

electric infrastructure and reduce the vulnerability of critical defense 

facilities to the disruption of the supply of electric energy to those 

facilities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 7, 2023 

Mr. CROW (for himself, Mr. BACON, and Mr. PETERS) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To provide the Secretary of Energy with the authority to 

enter into contracts and cooperative agreements to improve the resilience of defense critical electric infrastructure and reduce the vulnerability of critical defense facilities to the disruption of the supply of electric energy 

to those facilities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Guaranteeing Resilient 

5 Installations for Defense Act’’ or the ‘‘GRID Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1389 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEFENSE CRITICAL ELECTRIC INFRASTRUCTURE 

2 SECURITY. 

3 Section 215A of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 

4 824o–1) is amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (a)— 

6 (A) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘of the 

7 48 contiguous States or the District of Colum8 bia’’ and inserting ‘‘State’’; 

9 (B) by redesignating paragraph (8) as 

10 paragraph (9); and 

11 (C) by inserting after paragraph (7) the 

12 following: 

13 ‘‘(8) RESILIENCE.—The term ‘resilience’ has 

14 the meaning given the term in section 1304A(j) of 

15 the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 

16 (42 U.S.C. 17384a(j)).’’; 

17 (2) in subsection (c), in the matter preceding 

18 paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘the 48 contiguous States 

19 and the District of Columbia’’ and inserting ‘‘any 

20 State’’; and 

21 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

22 ‘‘(g) AUTHORITY TO ADDRESS VULNERABILITIES.— 

23 The Secretary may, to the extent that funds are made 

24 available for such purposes in advance in appropriations 

25 Acts, enter into contracts or cooperative agreements with 

26 external providers of electric energy— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1389 IH

1 ‘‘(1) to improve the resilience of defense critical 

2 electric infrastructure; and 

3 ‘‘(2) to reduce the vulnerability of critical de4 fense facilities designated under subsection (c) to the 

5 disruption of the supply of electric energy to those 

6 facilities.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA,

Respondent,

v.

EDGAR JAVIER ENRIQUEZ, 

Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 19-0297 PRPC

Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2006-163491-001

The Honorable Warren J. Granville, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney's Office, Phoenix

By Andrea L. Kever

Counsel for Respondent

Edgar Javier Enriquez, Safford

Petitioner

FILED 5-26-2020
STATE v. ENRIQUEZ

Decision of the Court

2

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge David D. Weinzweig delivered the decision of the Court, 

in which Judge Jennifer M. Perkins and Judge Michael J. Brown joined.

W E I N Z W E I G, Judge:

¶1 Petitioner Edgar Javier Enriquez seeks review of the superior 

court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant 

to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is petitioner’s first

petition. 

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will 

not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. 

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19, 278 P.3d 1276, 1280 (2012). It is 

petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by 

denying the petition for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 

537, ¶ 1, 260 P.3d 1102, 1103 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of 

establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition 

for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of 

discretion. 

¶4 We grant review and deny relief.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Roy Johnson, Appellant.

Motion for reargument granted, and upon reargument this court’s order entered on March 13,1980 [74 AD2d 1005] is vacated, and determination of the appeal held in abeyance pending receipt of defendant’s supplemental brief. Argument of the appeal will not be heard until the records forwarded to defendant are returned to the clerk of this court. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Ross, Lupiano, Silverman and Carro, JJ.
Appendix B

PRIVACY POLICY

One area of notable concern requiring attention regarding public and civil use of UAS technologies is personal privacy. Celestial Imaging LLC believes that an individual’s privacy is guaranteed by our Constitution and the Fourth Amendment and is sacrosanct and the potential for UAS technology to usurp those rights is very real. As with all new technology, we must move slowly in its application as we seek to include it in our daily lives. There are many emotional issues to overcome in the use of UAS technologies and part of our job in the UAS community is to ensure we educate and gain the trust of all people and to ensure we are ever mindful of t heir privacy concerns. Through demonstrated and responsible use and

communication with the public , we can show that UAS can be used in a safe and effective manner in our National Airspace System.

Celestial Imaging LLC will comply with all federal, state, and/or local privacy policies or rules that may apply in particular areas where the DJI Inspire 1 is used. Further, because we will only fly over property with the permission of the appropriate land owner, the likelihood that we will collect private inform ation of an unknown person is minimal. Imagery will be reviewed in a secure location to ensure that only the requested imagery was obtained and any imagery that is

consi dered private will be destroyed within 72 hours.

1 of 1
EX-4.13:



 






Exhibit 4.13




CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION

TO

CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION

OF

SERIES C PREFERRED STOCK

OF

SPANISH BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC.

FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE OF DELAWARE ON DECEMBER 22, 2004




     The undersigned, an officer of Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc. (the “Corporation”),
a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the
State of Delaware (the “DGCL”), in order to correct Annex A of the Certificate of
Designation of Series C Preferred Stock of the Corporation pursuant to Section 151 of the DGCL,
hereby certifies as follows:



     FIRST: The name of the Corporation is Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc.



     SECOND: That a Certificate of Designation of Series C Preferred Stock of the Corporation was
filed by the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on December 22, 2004 and that said
Certificate requires correction as permitted by Section 103 of the General Corporation Law of the
State of Delaware.



     THIRD: The inaccuracy or defect of said Certificate to be corrected is as follows:



     this Certificate is being filed to correct certain typographical errors.



     FOURTH: The following definitions in Paragraph 2 of the Certificate of Designation of Series C
Preferred Stock of the Corporation are corrected to read as follows:



     ‘“Issue
Date” means December 23, 2004.





     ‘“Merger Agreement” means the merger agreement dated as of October 5, 2004,
by and among, Infinity Media Corporation, Infinity Broadcasting Corporation
of San Francisco, the Company and SBS Bay Area, LLC.




     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Spanish Broadcasting System, Inc. has caused this Certificate to be signed
by Joseph A. García, its Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary, this 6th
day of January, 2005.



	 	 	 	 	 
	

	 	SPANISH
	 	BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC.
	 
	 	 	 	 
	

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Joseph A. García
	

	 	 	 	 
	

	 	 	 	Name: Joseph A. García

Title:   Executive Vice President, Chief Financial

            Officer and Secretary