alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE REGISTRANT'S
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD ENDED JANUARY 31, 1998,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                                 <C>       
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       7-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                            1,421,392
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     5,063,321
<ALLOWANCES>                                        384,100
<INVENTORY>                                      31,027,992
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 37,545,683
<PP&E>                                           33,654,322
<DEPRECIATION>                                   19,677,138
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   51,789,058
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            31,959,903
<BONDS>                                             858,596
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                             37,289
<OTHER-SE>                                       15,304,789
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     51,789,058
<SALES>                                          96,792,912
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 96,792,912
<CGS>                                            65,822,097
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    65,822,097
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 29,903,064
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  897,086
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     219,237
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1,175,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (955,763)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (955,763)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          (.26)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Donald R. Chappel, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Williams Partners L.P.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) [Intentionally omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 34-47986];  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: August 8, 2006       /s/ Donald R. Chappel     Donald R. Chappel    Chief Financial Officer of Williams Partners GP LLC,    general partner of Williams Partners L.P.    (Principal Financial Officer)  
55
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. Case No.: 3:96cr74/RV 

DARRELL GREEN

____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated December 19, 2012 (doc. 750). Defendant has been furnished a copy of the

Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to

Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all timely

filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely filed objections thereto

(doc. 752), I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.

2. Defendant is prohibited from filing any further initial pleadings, motions or appeals

that challenge the validity of, or otherwise relate to, his conviction and sentence in Case No.

3:96cr74/RV, regardless of the label Defendant may attach to his filing.

3. The clerk is directed to refer to chambers as deficient any pro se pleading that violates

or appears to violate the filing prohibition.

4. Defendant is expressly warned that submission of a prohibited or frivolous filing in

the future will subject him to additional sanctions.

DONE AND ORDERED this 3rd day of January, 2013.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DRAFT

Life Cycle Cost Analysis:

Clothes Washers

James E. McMahon

Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

JEMcMahon@lbl.gov

At DOE Workshop, Washington, D.C.

July 23, 1997

* ^ ' : * *. ; . ** ^. .' ' ; - * . '* ^~~
Ideas for eliminating

"black boxes" i

Make models as simple as possible

Make copies of models more accessible

- available from USDOE or contractor

- on World Wide Web

Make models easier to use

- Graphical user interface

- Develop detailed documentation

Conduct training workshops

- central location (e.g., public workshop)

- on-site at stakeholder location

- computer link or

- videoconference

Energy Analysis Program
Life Cycle Cost Spreadsheet :?1

Graphical user interface

* Menus of alternative assumptions

- Future energy prices

- Baseline efficiency

- Standard level

User control of inputs

- Start date

- Discount rate

- Override feature (e.g., appliance price)

Energy Analysis Program 5
Life Cycle Cost includes:

* Appliance price (+ installation cost)

* Operating expenses

- energy

- water and sewage

- maintenance

- service

* Lifetime

* Discount rate

Energy Analysis Program
Clothes washer LCC:

Energy expenses

* Clothes washer

- electricity

* Water heater (by fuel type)

- electricity

- natural gas

- fuel oil

-LPG

- other (kerosene, coal, coke, wood, solar)

- none

* Clothes dryer (by fueltype)

- electricity

- natural gas

- none

Energy Analysis Program
Uncertainty analysis -Zr

* Identify key uncertainties and variabilities

- uncertainty: incomplete information

- variability: range of values

* Estimate ranges rather than point values

- minimum, likeliest, maximum values

* Express output as ranges

- (e.g., percent of consumers having lower life cycle cost)

· Conduct scenario ("what-if') analysis

- (e.g., future energy prices)

Energy Analysis Program
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

MICHAEL J. KAHANE,

FDOC Inmate No. K59166, 

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:20cv5156/LAC/EMT

M. CARROLL,

Defendant.

__________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge’s

Report and Recommendation dated April 15, 2020 (ECF No. 4). Plaintiff has been

furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and afforded an opportunity

to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No

objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined it

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is DENIED.

Case 3:20-cv-05156-LC-EMT Document 5 Filed 05/15/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

3. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) as malicious and pursuant to the three strikes

provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

4. The clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 15th day of May, 2020.

 s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No. 3:20cv5156/LAC/EMT

Case 3:20-cv-05156-LC-EMT Document 5 Filed 05/15/20 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Lightwave Logic, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James S. Marcelli, Chief Executive Officer of our Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of our Company.



Date:  May 16, 2011

/s/ James S. Marcelli

James S. Marcelli

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2223 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2223

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  220 Elm Avenue in Munising, Michigan, as the ``Elizabeth L. Kinnunen 
                         Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. ELIZABETH L. KINNUNEN POST OFFICE BUILDING.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 220 Elm Avenue in Munising, Michigan, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Elizabeth L. Kinnunen Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Elizabeth 
L. Kinnunen Post Office Building''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>    5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Statement of Financial Condition at October 31, 1999 and the Statement of
Income for the Year Ended October 31, 1999.  It is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              Oct-31-1999
<CASH>                                    44,291
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                            108,527
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                              516,011
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         738,525
<PP&E>                                   178,566
<DEPRECIATION>                           147,490
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           936,393
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     60,496
<BONDS>                                        0
<COMMON>                                 283,036
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             936,393
<SALES>                                  835,452
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         835,452
<CGS>                                    288,565
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            640,214
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          47,476
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        52,866
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (140,803)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                            (140,803)
<EPS-BASIC>                               (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (.02)

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 94A22 Filed 20 October 2023 HOLLIS L. BATSON and CAROL D. BATSON; LAWRENCE F. BALDWIN and ELIZABETH C. BALDWIN; BALDWIN

- BATSON OWNERS’ ASSOCIATION, INC.

v. COASTAL RESOURCES COMMISSION and NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A

- 30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 282 N.C. App. 1 (202 2 ), vacating a n order entered on 23 September 2020 by Ju dge Charles H . H enry in Superior Court, Carteret County , and remanding the case

. Heard in the Supreme Court on 20 September 2023.
I. Clark Wright Jr. for petitioner

- appellees. Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General , by Mary L

. Lucasse , Special Deputy Attorney General, for respondent

- appellant Coastal Resources Commission

. No brief for respondent

- appellee North Carolina Department of Transportation.

PER CURIAM

. Justice D IETZ did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case. The remaining members of the Court are equally divided, with three members voting to affirm and three members voting to reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals. Accordingly, the decisi on of the Court of Appeals is left undisturbed and stands without precedential value. See City of Charlotte v. Univ. Fin. Props. , LLC , 373 N.C.
325 (20 20 ) (per curiam) (affirming by an equally divided vote a Court of AppealsB ATSON V
. C OASTAL R ES
. C OMM ’ N Opinion of the Court

- 2

- decision without precedential value). AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 10.10
 
   Position
 Departmental Responsibilities
 Salary Grade IBase Annual Salary
 Annual Incentive Plan Eligibility
 Lone-Term Incentive Eligibility
 American Commercial Lines LLC




---



##### 



Employee Benefits
 Vacation
 Pre-employment
Screening:
   
 
 By
signing below, I agree to accept employment with ACL under the terms
outlined herein. I
acknowledge and agree that my employment with ACL does not breach any agreements with any other
employer and I further agree to maintain the secrecy of, and not to use in any way, any
confidential or proprietary information or trade secrets belonging to any other employer in the
performance of my duties for ACL. I understand and agree that this letter is provided for
information purposes only and does not guarantee employment for any definite duration. I understand
that I shall have the right to terminate my employment with ACL at any time for any reason by
providing ACL with reasonable notice and the Company shall have the same right to discontinue my
employment at any time for any reason.
 -s- Dawn R. Landry
    
    25 Apr 08Dawn R. Landry
    
    Date
 American Commercial Lines LLC
§ 1950.102 General. ( a ) Rural Development will do everything possible to assist borrowers entering the armed forces to adjust their affairs in contemplation of military service. It is not the policy of Rural Development to renew, postpone, or modify annual installments due under a promissory note because of the borrower's entry into the armed services. However, under the Soldiers' and Sailors' Civil Relief Act of 1940, the property of a borrower in the armed forces cannot validly be seized or sold by foreclosure or otherwise during the borrower's tenure of service, or for three months thereafter, except ( 1 ) pursuant to an agreement entered into by the borrower after having been accepted for service, or
( 2 ) by order of the Court. Any person causing an invalid sale to be made is guilty of a misdemeanor. Regardless of the foregoing, the long-time interest of the borrower can best be served by prompt and satisfactory arrangements for the use and protection, or disposition, of the security property in accordance with the policies expressed herein. Upon request, OGC will inform the State Director with respect to relief which may be secured by a borrower under the Soldiers' and Sailors' Civil Relief Act of 1940.
( b ) In connection with Multiple Housing loans to individuals, references to County Supervisor and County Office in this subpart will be read as District Director and District Office.
[50 FR 45763, Nov. 1, 1985, as amended at 80 FR 9890, Feb. 24, 2015]
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2245 

To prohibit the Ambassador’s Fund for Cultural Preservation from making 

grants, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 4, 2013 

Mr. LANKFORD introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Ambassador’s Fund for Cultural Preservation 

from making grants, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION. 

4 No funds made available to the Department of State 

5 or any department or agency may be used to carry out 

6 the Ambassador’s Fund for Cultural Preservation or any 

7 other such program to provide grants for cultural preser8 vation outside the United States. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### The State ex rel. Graham, Appellant, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellee.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Graham v. Indus. Comm.*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 97.]

(No. 96-2079

Submitted July 8, 1998

Decided September 9, 1998.)

*Raymond J. Tisone & Associates Co., L.P.A.,*and *Raymond J. Tisone,*for appellant.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Doug S. Musick,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

*98The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Douglas, J., dissents and would order relief consistent with *State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm*(1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666.

F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents.

Cook, J., dissents and would deny the writ.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsStand Alone Pressure Measurement Device (SAPMD) for the space shuttle Orbiter, part 2The Stand Alone Pressure Measurement Device (SAPMD) specifications are examined. The HP.SAPMD GSE software is listed; the HP/SGA readme program is presented; and the SPMD acceptance test procedure is described.Document ID19900006887Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsTomlinson, Bill*(Southwest Research Inst. San Antonio, TX, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1989Subject CategoryInstrumentation And PhotographyReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:172119-PT-2NASA-CR-172119-PT-2Accession Number90N16203Funding Number(s)PROJECT: SWRI PROJ. 15-1062CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS9-17601Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900006887.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 28.416 Strict Good Ordinary Light Spotted Color.

Strict Good Ordinary Light Spotted Color is color which in spot or color, or both, is between Strict Good Ordinary Color and Strict Good Ordinary Spotted Color.