alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before HACKEL
, FLUHR , and BLOSSER Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES Appellee

v.
David G. HOTZ III Private First Class (E

- 2 ), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant

No. 20 2 3 00 081

_________________________
Decided: 21 September 2023
Appeal from the United States Nav y
- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judges : Benjamin Robles (arraignment) Ryan Lipton (trial)
Sentence adjudged 5 November 2022 by a general court

- martial convened at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune , North Carolina, consisting of a military judge sitting alone

. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment : reduction to E

- 1, confinement for 22 months , dishonorable discharge. 1

1 Appellant received 265 days of confinement credit, consisting of 205 days of pretrial confinement credit and 60 days of judicially ordered credit.United States v. Hotz , NMCCA No. 20 2 3 00 081 Opinion of the Court

2 For Appellant: Lieutenant Colonel Matthew Neely, US MC

_________________________
This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2 (a)

.

_________________________

PER CURIAM : After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assig nment of error, and Appellant having not challenged the factual sufficiency of this case, we have determined that the findings are correct in law, the sentence is correctin law and fact, and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. 2
T he findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT:

MARK K. JAMISON Clerk of Court

2 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Report of China Runji Cement Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Xiangfei Zeng, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:








1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Xiangfei Zeng


Xiangfei Zeng


Chief Financial Officer





January 14, 2010
CERTIFICATION



I, Bruce Hollingshead, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/Amendment #1 of the Company;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officers, if any, and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I (we) have:



(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (Evaluation Date); and

(c)

presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrants other certifying officers, if any, and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



(a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

(b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and



6.

The registrants other certifying officers, if any, and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were any significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.







/s/ Bruce Hollingshead

Date: August 27, 2007

Bruce Hollingshead, President/Director

Chief Executive Officer
#### § 29.9237 When application deemed filed.

An application shall be deemed filed when delivered to the office of inspection. When an application is filed, the date and time of filing shall be recorded by the official receiving it.
#### § 29.3509 Color intensity.

The varying degree of saturation or chroma. Color intensity as applied to tobacco describes the strength or weakness of a specific color or hue. It is applicable to all colors except green. (See Elements of Quality, § 29.3586.)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7599

ISIAH JAMES, JR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus P. DOUGLAS TAYLOR, Warden; MICHAEL MOORE, Director; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-98-742-0-13BD) Submitted: January 21, 1999 Decided: February 9, 1999 Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Isiah James, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Lauri J. Soles, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Isiah James, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders (1) denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition, which the district court properly construed as a petition under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998), and (2) denying his motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record, the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to deny relief on the underlying petition, and the court’s opinion denying James’ Rule 59(e) motion and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See James v. Taylor , No. CA-98-742-0-13BD (D.S.C. Aug. 18 & Sept. 29, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2319 

AN ACT 

To clarify certain provisions of the Native American 

Veterans’ Memorial Establishment Act of 1994. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2319 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Native American Vet3 erans’ Memorial Amendments Act of 2013’’. 

4 SEC. 2. NATIVE AMERICAN VETERANS’ MEMORIAL. 

5 (a) AUTHORITY TO ESTABLISH MEMORIAL.—Section 

6 3 of the Native American Veterans’ Memorial Establish7 ment Act of 1994 (20 U.S.C. 80q–5 note; 108 Stat. 4067) 

8 is amended— 

9 (1) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘within the in10 terior structure of the facility provided for by’’ and 

11 inserting ‘‘on property under the jurisdiction of the 

12 Museum on the site described in’’; and 

13 (2) in subsection (c)(1), by striking ‘‘, in con14 sultation with the Museum, is’’ and inserting ‘‘and 

15 the National Museum of the American Indian are’’. 

16 (b) PAYMENT OF EXPENSES.—Section 4(a) of the 

17 Native American Veterans’ Memorial Establishment Act 

18 of 1994 (20 U.S.C. 80q–5 note; 108 Stat. 4067) is amend19 ed— 

20 (1) in the heading, by inserting ‘‘AND NA21 TIONAL MUSEUM OF THE AMERICAN INDIAN’’ after 

22 ‘‘AMERICAN INDIANS’’; and 
3 

•HR 2319 EH

1 (2) in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘shall be 

2 solely’’ and inserting ‘‘and the National Museum of 

3 the American Indian shall be’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives December 11, 

2013. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2319 

AN ACT 

To clarify certain provisions of the Native American 

Veterans’ Memorial Establishment Act of 1994.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2225 

To restore the traditional day of observance of Memorial Day, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 3, 2013 

Ms. HANABUSA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the 

Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined 

by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 

within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To restore the traditional day of observance of Memorial 

Day, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. RESTORATION OF TRADITIONAL DAY OF OB4 SERVANCE OF MEMORIAL DAY. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION OF LEGAL PUBLIC HOLIDAY.— 

6 Section 6103(a) of title 5, United States Code, is amended 

7 by striking ‘‘Memorial Day, the last Monday in May.’’ and 

8 inserting the following: 

9 ‘‘Memorial Day, May 30.’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2225 IH

1 (b) OBSERVANCES AND CEREMONIES.—Section 116 

2 of title 36, United States Code, is amended— 

3 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘The last 

4 Monday in May’’ and inserting ‘‘May 30’’; and 

5 (2) in subsection (b)— 

6 (A) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of para7 graph (3); 

8 (B) by redesignating paragraph (4) as 

9 paragraph (5); and 

10 (C) by inserting after paragraph (3) the 

11 following: 

12 ‘‘(4) calling on the people of the United States 

13 to observe Memorial Day as a day of ceremonies to 

14 show respect for United States veterans of wars and 

15 other military conflicts; and’’. 

16 (c) DISPLAY OF FLAG.— 

17 (1) TIME AND OCCASIONS FOR FLAG DIS18 PLAY.—Section 6(d) of title 4, United States Code, 

19 is amended by striking ‘‘the last Monday in May;’’ 

20 and inserting ‘‘May 30;’’. 

21 (2) NATIONAL LEAGUE OF FAMILIES POW/MIA

22 FLAG.—Section 902(c)(1)(B) of title 36, United 

23 States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘the last Mon24 day in May’’ and inserting ‘‘May 30’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

SILFREDO R. MERIDO-RONDON,

A3 216-259-767,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 4:20cv170-MW/MAF

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney 

General of the United States,

et al.,

Respondents,

___________________________/ 

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report 

and Recommendation. ECF No. 12. Upon consideration, no objection having 

been filed by the parties,1

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as this Court’s 

opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss, 

ECF No. 10, is GRANTED. The § 2241 petition is DISMISSED as moot since 

1 Mail to Petitioner has been returned as “Vacant Unable to Forward.” ECF No. 13.

Case 4:20-cv-00170-MW-MAF Document 14 Filed 07/23/20 Page 1 of 2
2

Petitioner has been granted the relief sought in the petition.” The Clerk shall also 

close the file.

SO ORDERED on July 22, 2020.

s/ MARK E. WALKER

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00170-MW-MAF Document 14 Filed 07/23/20 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 222 (Thursday, November 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 70742]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29039]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER11-2039-000]


E-T Global Energy, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request For Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

November 8, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
E-T Global Energy, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes 
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR Part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is November 29, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#efa9aabdaca0818386818abc9a9f9f809d9baf898a9d8cc1888099"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e3a5a6b1a0ac8d8f8a8d86b09693938c9197a385869180cd848c95">[email protected]</span></a> or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-29039 Filed 11-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Case 3:20-cv-04698-TKW-HTC Document 20-2 Filed 04/23/20 Page 1 of 5
Case 3:20-cv-04698-TKW-HTC Document 20-2 Filed 04/23/20 Page 2 of 5
Case 3:20-cv-04698-TKW-HTC Document 20-2 Filed 04/23/20 Page 3 of 5
Case 3:20-cv-04698-TKW-HTC Document 20-2 Filed 04/23/20 Page 4 of 5
Case 3:20-cv-04698-TKW-HTC Document 20-2 Filed 04/23/20 Page 5 of 5
Exhibit 99.7

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:



and
to the use of our reports dated February 14, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Petro-Canada and the effectiveness of Petro-Canada's
internal control over financial reporting (which report on the consolidated financial statements expresses an unqualified opinion and includes a separate report titled Comments by Independent
Registered Chartered Accountants on CanadaUnited States of America Reporting Difference referring to changes in accounting principles that have a material effect on the
comparability of the financial statements), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Petro-Canada for the year ended December 31, 2007.

GRAPHIC

Independent
Registered Chartered Accountants
Calgary, Canada
February 14, 2008

---



QuickLinks
## In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 17

- 00034

- CR

DONALD COLEMAN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 5th District Court

Bowie County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16F0639

- 005

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Burgess2 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Donald Coleman has filed a motion to dismiss th is appeal. The motion was signed by both

Coleman and his appellate counsel in compliance with Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas Rules of

Appellate Procedure. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.2(a). As authorized by Rule 42.2(a), we grant the

motion. See id.

Accordingly , we dismiss this appeal.

Ralph K. Burgess

Justice

Date Submitted: April 27, 2017

Date Decided: April 28, 2017

Do Not Publish
**Exhibit 32.2****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Directed Electronics, Inc. (the“Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ronald F. Dutt, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                  /s/ Ronald F. Dutt   Ronald F. Dutt  Date: August 9, 2007 Chief Financial Officer
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-07-14T20:15:22-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2291 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 509
113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2291

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 15, 2014

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                             July 31, 2014

               Reported by Mr. Carper, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 450 Lexington Avenue in New York, New York, as the ``Vincent R. 
                        Sombrotto Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. VINCENT R. SOMBROTTO POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 450 Lexington Avenue in New York, New York, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Vincent R. Sombrotto Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Vincent R. 
Sombrotto Post Office''.
                                                       Calendar No. 509

113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 2291

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 450 Lexington Avenue in New York, New York, as the ``Vincent R. 
                        Sombrotto Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 31, 2014

                       Reported without amendment
```
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAirborne Wind Shear Detection and Warning Systems: Third Combined Manufacturers' and Technologists' Conference, part 2The Third Combined Manufacturers' and Technologists' Conference was held in Hampton, Va., on October 16-18, 1990. The purpose of the meeting was to transfer significant on-going results of the NASA/FAA joint Airborne Wind Shear Program to the technical industry and to pose problems of current concern to the combined group. It also provided a forum for manufacturers to review forward-look technology concepts and for technologists to gain an understanding of the problems encountered by the manufacturers during the development of airborne equipment and the FAA certification requirements.Document ID19910014827Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference ProceedingsAuthorsVicroy, Dan D.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA., United States)*Bowles, Roland L.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA., United States)*Schlickenmaier, Herbert*(Federal Aviation Administration Washington, DC., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1991Subject CategoryAir Transportation And SafetyReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.55:10060-PT-2DOT/FAA/RD-91/2-PT-2NASA-CP-10060-PT-2Accession Number91N24140Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-64-12Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910014827.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsIDRelationTitleN91-24141 through N91-24156Workvisibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 27.28 Disposition of samples.

Samples submitted to a Marketing Services Office shall become the property of the Department and shall be disposed of in accordance with the property regulations of Department when no longer needed for classification or Micronaire determinations.

[48 FR 49211, Oct. 25, 1983]