Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 224 / Monday, November 22, 2010 / Notices 71125 

IV. Are there changes in the estimates 

from the last approval? 

There is a decrease of 3,610 hours 

(from 3,750 hours to 140 hours) in the 

total estimated annual respondent 

burden compared with that identified in 

the information collection most recently 

approved by OMB. This decrease 

reflects improved estimates of the 

number of applications EPA expects to 

receive, based on actual experience in 

administering the SDSI program. The 

decrease is an adjustment. 

V. What is the next step in the process 

for this ICR? 

EPA will consider the comments 

received and amend the ICR as 

appropriate. The final ICR package will 

then be submitted to OMB for review 

and approval pursuant to 5 CFR 

1320.12. EPA will issue another Federal 

Register notice pursuant to 5 CFR 

1320.5(a)(1)(iv) to announce the 

submission of the ICR to OMB and the 

opportunity to submit additional 

comments to OMB. If you have any 

questions about this ICR or the approval 

process, please contact the technical 

person listed under FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT. 

List of Subjects 

Environmental protection, Reporting 

and recordkeeping requirements. 

Dated: November 16, 2010. 

Stephen A. Owens, 

Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical 

Safety and Pollution Prevention. 

[FR Doc. 2010–29393 Filed 11–19–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[FRL–9229–7] 

Proposed Consent Decree, Clean Air 

Act Citizen Suit 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of proposed consent 

decree; request for public comment. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 

113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended 

(‘‘CAA’’ or the ‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), 

notice is hereby given of a proposed 

consent decree to address a lawsuit filed 

by Association of Irritated Residents in 

the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of California: 

Association of Irritated Residents v. 

Jackson, No. 3:10–CV–03051–WHA 

(N.D. CA.). On July 12, 2010, Plaintiff 

filed a complaint alleging that EPA 

failed to perform a mandatory duty 

under section 110(k)(2) of the CAA, 42 

U.S.C. 7410(k)(2), to take timely final 

action on a submission entitled the 2008 

PM2.5 San Joaquin Valley Unified Air 

Pollution Control District Plan (the SJV 

PM2.5 Nonattainment SIP), which was 

submitted to EPA on or about June 30, 

2008. The SJV PM2.5 nonattainment SIP 

includes measures intended to control 

emissions of fine particulate matter and 

its precursors within the San Joaquin 

Valley for purposes of attaining the 1997 

annual and 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. The 

proposed consent decree establishes a 

deadline for EPA to take action on the 

SJV PM2.5 nonattainment SIP. 

DATES: Written comments on the 

proposed consent decree must be 

received by December 22, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID number EPA– 

HQ–OGC–2010–0886, online at http:// 

www.regulations.gov (EPA’s preferred 

method); by e-mail to 

oei.docket@epa.gov; by mail to EPA 

Docket Center, Environmental 

Protection Agency, Mailcode: 2822T, 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., 

Washington, DC 20460–0001; or by 

hand delivery or courier to EPA Docket 

Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 

Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, 

DC, between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. 

Monday through Friday, excluding legal 

holidays. Comments on a disk or CD– 

ROM should be formatted in Word or 

ASCII file, avoiding the use of special 

characters and any form of encryption, 

and may be mailed to the mailing 

address above. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Geoffrey L. Wilcox, Air and Radiation 

Law Office (2344A), Office of General 

Counsel, U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., 

Washington, DC 20460; telephone: (202) 

564–5601; fax number (202) 564–5603; 

email address: wilcox.geoffrey@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Additional Information About the 

Proposed Consent Decree 

The proposed consent decree would 

resolve a lawsuit seeking to compel the 

Agency to take timely final action under 

section 110(k) of the CAA to approve, 

disapprove, or partially approve/ 

disapprove the submission entitled the 

2008 PM2.5 San Joaquin Valley Unified 

Air Pollution Control District Plan (the 

SJV PM2.5 nonattainment SIP), which 

was submitted to EPA on or about June 

30, 2008. The SJV PM2.5 nonattainment 

SIP includes measures intended to 

control emissions of fine particulate 

matter and its precursors from sources 

located within the designated 

nonattainment area in the San Joaquin 

Valley of California, for purposes of 

attaining the 1997 annual and 24-hour 

PM2.5 NAAQS. The proposed consent 

decree requires that no later than 

September 30, 2011, EPA shall sign a 

notice taking the Agency’s final action 

on the SJV PM2.5 nonattainment SIP, 

pursuant to section 110(k) of the CAA, 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k). In addition, the 

proposed consent decree requires that 

no later than 15 business days following 

signature, EPA shall send the notice to 

the Office of the Federal Register for 

review and publication in the Federal 

Register. After EPA fulfills its 

obligations under the proposed consent 

decree, it provides that the parties shall 

file a joint request to the Court to 

dismiss this matter with prejudice. 

For a period of thirty (30) days 

following the date of publication of this 

notice, the Agency will accept written 

comments relating to the proposed 

consent decree from persons who were 

not named as parties or intervenors to 

the litigation in question. EPA or the 

Department of Justice may withdraw or 

withhold consent to the proposed 

consent decree if the comments disclose 

facts or considerations that indicate that 

such consent is inappropriate, 

improper, inadequate, or inconsistent 

with the requirements of the Act. Unless 

EPA or the Department of Justice 

determines that consent to this consent 

decree should be withdrawn, the terms 

of the proposed consent decree will be 

affirmed. 

II. Additional Information About 

Commenting on the Proposed Consent 

Decree 

A. How can I get a copy of the consent 

decree? 

The official public docket for this 

action (identified by Docket ID No. 

EPA–HQ–OGC–2010–0886) contains a 

copy of the proposed consent decree. 

The official public docket is available 

for public viewing at the Office of 

Environmental Information (OEI) Docket 

in the EPA Docket Center, EPA West, 

Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., 

NW., Washington, DC. The EPA Docket 

Center Public Reading Room is open 

from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, excluding legal 

holidays. The telephone number for the 

Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, 

and the telephone number for the OEI 

Docket is (202) 566–1752. 

An electronic version of the public 

docket is available through http:// 

www.regulations.gov. You may use 

http://www.regulations.gov to submit or 

view public comments, access the index 

listing of the contents of the official 

public docket, and to access those 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
71126 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 224 / Monday, November 22, 2010 / Notices 

documents in the public docket that are 

available electronically. Once in the 

system, key in the appropriate docket 

identification number then select 

‘‘search’’. 

It is important to note that EPA’s 

policy is that public comments, whether 

submitted electronically or in paper, 

will be made available for public 

viewing online at http:// 

www.regulations.gov without change, 

unless the comment contains 

copyrighted material, CBI, or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Information 

claimed as CBI and other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute 

is not included in the official public 

docket or in the electronic public 

docket. EPA’s policy is that copyrighted 

material, including copyrighted material 

contained in a public comment, will not 

be placed in EPA’s electronic public 

docket but will be available only in 

printed, paper form in the official public 

docket. Although not all docket 

materials may be available 

electronically, you may still access any 

of the publicly available docket 

materials through the EPA Docket 

Center. 

B. How and to whom do I submit 

comments? 

You may submit comments as 

provided in the ADDRESSES section. 

Please ensure that your comments are 

submitted within the specified comment 

period. Comments received after the 

close of the comment period will be 

marked ‘‘late.’’ EPA is not required to 

consider these late comments. 

If you submit an electronic comment, 

EPA recommends that you include your 

name, mailing address, and an e-mail 

address or other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. This 

ensures that you can be identified as the 

submitter of the comment and allows 

EPA to contact you in case EPA cannot 

read your comment due to technical 

difficulties or needs further information 

on the substance of your comment. Any 

identifying or contact information 

provided in the body of a comment will 

be included as part of the comment that 

is placed in the official public docket, 

and made available in EPA’s electronic 

public docket. If EPA cannot read your 

comment due to technical difficulties 

and cannot contact you for clarification, 

EPA may not be able to consider your 

comment. 

Use of the http://www.regulations.gov 

Web site to submit comments to EPA 

electronically is EPA’s preferred method 

for receiving comments. The electronic 

public docket system is an ‘‘anonymous 

access’’ system, which means EPA will 

not know your identity, e-mail address, 

or other contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

In contrast to EPA’s electronic public 

docket, EPA’s electronic mail (e-mail) 

system is not an ‘‘anonymous access’’ 

system. If you send an e-mail comment 

directly to the Docket without going 

through http://www.regulations.gov, 

your e-mail address is automatically 

captured and included as part of the 

comment that is placed in the official 

public docket, and made available in 

EPA’s electronic public docket. 

Dated: November 12, 2010. 

Richard B. Ossias, 

Associate General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 2010–29404 Filed 11–19–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[FRL–9229–8] 

Proposed Consent Decree, Clean Air 

Act Citizen Suit 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of Proposed Consent 

Decree; Request for Public Comment. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 

113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended 

(‘‘CAA’’ or the ‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), 

notice is hereby given of a proposed 

consent decree to address a lawsuit filed 

by Sierra Club and Medical Advocates 

for Healthy Air (collectively ‘‘Plaintiffs’’) 

in the United States District Court for 

the Northern District of California: 

Sierra Club, et al. v. Jackson, No. 10–cv– 

01954 VRW (N.D. CAO.). On May 6, 

2010, Plaintiffs filed a complaint 

alleging that EPA failed to perform a 

mandatory duty under section 110(k)(2) 

of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7410(k)(2) to take 

timely final action to approve, 

disapprove, or partially approve/ 

disapprove the San Joaquin Valley Air 

Pollution Control District’s 8-Hour 

Ozone Plan, which was submitted to 

EPA on November 16, 2007. The 

proposed consent decree establishes a 

deadline for EPA to take action. 

DATES: Written comments on the 

proposed consent decree must be 

received by December 22, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID number EPA– 

HQ–OGC–2010–0942, online at http:// 

www.regulations.gov (EPA’s preferred 

method); by e-mail to 

oei.docket@epa.gov; by mail to EPA 

Docket Center, Environmental 

Protection Agency, Mailcode: 2822T, 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., 

Washington, DC 20460–0001; or by 

hand delivery or courier to EPA Docket 

Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 

Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, 

DC, between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. 

Monday through Friday, excluding legal 

holidays. Comments on a disk or CD– 

ROM should be formatted in Word or 

ASCII file, avoiding the use of special 

characters and any form of encryption, 

and may be mailed to the mailing 

address above. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jan 

Tierney, Air and Radiation Law Office 

(2344A), Office of General Counsel, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 

Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, 

DC 20460; telephone: (202) 564–5598; 

fax number (202) 564–5603; email 

address: tierney.jan@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Additional Information About the 

Proposed Consent Decree 

The proposed consent decree would 

resolve a lawsuit seeking to compel the 

Administrator to take timely final action 

under section 110(k) of the CAA to 

approve, disapprove, or partially 

approve/disapprove the San Joaquin 

Valley Air Pollution Control District’s 8- 

Hour Ozone Plan, which was submitted 

to EPA on November 16, 2007 (8-Hour 

Ozone Plan). The proposed consent 

decree requires that no later than 

December 15, 2011, EPA shall sign a 

notice of the Agency’s final action on 

the 8-Hour Ozone Plan pursuant to 

section 110(k) of the CAA, and 

thereafter send the notice to the Office 

of the Federal Register for publication. 

After EPA fulfills its obligations under 

the decree, the parties shall file a joint 

request to the Court to dismiss this 

matter with prejudice. 

For a period of thirty (30) days 

following the date of publication of this 

notice, the Agency will accept written 

comments relating to the proposed 

consent decree from persons who were 

not named as parties or intervenors to 

the litigation in question. EPA or the 

Department of Justice may withdraw or 

withhold consent to the proposed 

consent decree if the comments disclose 

facts or considerations that indicate that 

such consent is inappropriate, 

improper, inadequate, or inconsistent 

with the requirements of the Act. Unless 

EPA or the Department of Justice 

determines that consent to this consent 

decree should be withdrawn, the terms 

of the decree will be affirmed. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES