alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 319.74-1 Definitions.

*Administrator.* The Administrator of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, United States Department of Agriculture, or any employee of the United States Department of Agriculture delegated to act in his or her stead.

*Controlled import permit.* A written or electronically transmitted authorization issued by APHIS for the importation into the United States of otherwise prohibited or restricted plant material for experimental, therapeutic, or developmental purposes, under controlled conditions as prescribed by the Administrator in accordance with § 319.6.

*Cut flower.* The highly perishable commodity known in the commercial flower-producing industry as a cut flower, which is the severed portion of a plant, including the inflorescence and any parts of the plant attached to it, in a fresh state and not for planting. This definition does not include dried, bleached, dyed, or chemically treated decorative plant materials; filler or greenery, such as fern fronds and asparagus plumes, frequently packed with fresh cut flowers; or Christmas greenery, such as holly, mistletoe, and Christmas trees.

*Inspector.* Any individual authorized by the Administrator to enforce this subpart.

*United States.* All of the States, the District of Columbia, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands of the United States, and all other territories or possessions of the United States.

[64 FR 38110, July 15, 1999, as amended at 78 FR 25571, May 2, 2013; 83 FR 11866, Mar. 19, 2018]
Page 1 of 2 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENSACOLA DIVISION 

RUTH ELLEN REEVES, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. Case No. 3:20cv3658-RV-HTC 

MARK T. ESPER, and 

MONGELL 

 Defendants. 

____________________________/ 

ORDER 

 This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge’s Report 

and Recommendation dated March 11, 2020. (Doc. 5). The parties have been 

furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an 

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 

636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of Plaintiff’s objections. (Docs. 6, 

7). 

 Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and Plaintiff’s 

objections, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be 

adopted. 
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:20cv3658-RV-HTC 

 Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows: 

 1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this order. 

 2. This case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). 

 3. The clerk is directed to close the file. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 30th day of March, 2020. 

 

 /s/ Roger Vinson / 

 ROGER VINSON 

 SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Nicholas Mauro, Appellant.

Appeal held, decision reserved and matter remitted to Erie County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the Memorandum in *People*v. *Fino*(27 A D 2d 689). (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court convicting defendant of violation of sections 986-b and 812 of the Penal Law.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Henry, Del Yecehio and Marsh, JJ.
EXHIBIT 10.1

ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT

By and Between Holloman Energy Corporation and

Holloman Corporation



WHEREAS, Holloman Corporation (Holloman), an affiliated company, has contributed management advice, industry expertise, engineering services, personnel, North American travel expenses, office support and other valuable assistance, at no charge to Holloman Energy Corporation (the Company); and

WHEREAS, the Company desires to maintain the benefit of such services from Holloman and to provide compensation for such services,

NOW THEREFORE, effective September 1, 2008, the Company and Holloman agree as follows:

1.

In consideration for the payment of $50,000 each month, Holloman will provide the following to the Company:

·

Executive consultation, industry expertise and management advice

·

Engineering and geological services support (to the extent available using Hollomans in-house resources and without acquiring 3rd party expertise)

·

Reasonable office space and central files support

·

Accounting, software and operations services on a limited basis

·

Secretarial service, word processing, answering service, office equipment, telephone, fax, email, office supplies, postage and courier charges on a limited basis

·

The expenses associated with US domestic and Canadian travel, lodging and other miscellaneous expenses incurred by Hollomans personnel in connection with the performance of the support services under this Agreement

2.

The monthly consideration earned by Holloman shall be payable in the restricted common stock of the Company. Monthly management and support services fees shall be converted to the Companys stock at the average closing price of the stock for the last 10 trading-days of the applicable monthly billing period. Delivery of the Companys share certificates in payment of the management and support services fees to be made once each fiscal quarter, within 30 days following the close of that fiscal quarter.

3.

Either party may terminate this Agreement on 30 days notice to the other party.

4.

This Agreement contains the entire agreement among the parties with respect to the matters contained herein. Any dispute relating to this Agreement will be settled through binding arbitration in Houston, Texas in accordance with the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association.



DATED: September 1, 2008



AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED:

|                            |                          
|--------------------------- | -------------------------
|HOLLOMAN ENERGY CORPORATION
|                            |                          
|By:                         | /s/ GRANT PETERSEN       
|                            | Grant Petersen, President
|                            |                          
|                            |                          
|HOLLOMAN ENERGY CORPORATION
|                            |                          
|By:                         | /s/ MARKSTEVENSON        
|                            | Mark Petersen, President
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 16, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 69916]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28809]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Research Service


Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive License

AGENCY: Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant to 
American Packaging Corporation of Rochester, New York, an exclusive 
license to U.S. Patent No. 7,387,205, ``Packaging System for Preserving 
Perishable Items'', issued on June 17, 2008.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 16, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 
5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Rm. 4-1174, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-5131.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: June Blalock of the Office of 
Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above; telephone: 
301-504-5989.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Government's patent rights in 
this invention are assigned to the United States of America, as 
represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public 
interest to so license this invention as American Packaging Corporation 
of Rochester, New York has submitted a complete and sufficient 
application for a license. The prospective exclusive license will be 
royalty-bearing and will comply with the terms and conditions of 35 
U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The prospective exclusive license may be 
granted unless, within thirty (30) days from the date of this published 
Notice, the Agricultural Research Service receives written evidence and 
argument which establishes that the grant of the license would not be 
consistent with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.

Richard J. Brenner,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2010-28809 Filed 11-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-03-P
§ 3201.113 Intermediates—Fibers and Fabrics. ( a ) *Definition.* Intermediates—Fibers and Fabrics encompasses plant and animal fibers, fibers made from plant-derived polymers that are not yet formed into more complex products such as carpet or fabrics, fabrics made from natural fibers, fabrics made from synthetic fibers, or fabrics made from a blend of the two. These materials are used to manufacture finished products such as clothing, upholstery, or drapes.
( b ) *Minimum biobased content.* The Federal preferred procurement product must have a minimum biobased content of at least 25 percent, which shall be based on the amount of qualifying biobased carbon in the product as a percent of the weight (mass) of the total organic carbon in the finished product.
( c ) *Preference compliance date.* No later than July 10, 2019, procuring agencies, in accordance with this part, will give a procurement preference for qualifying biobased Intermediates—Fibers and Fabrics. By that date, Federal agencies responsible for drafting or reviewing specifications for products to be procured shall ensure that the relevant specifications require the use of biobased Intermediates—Fibers and Fabrics.
[83 FR 31848, July 10, 2018]
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 10.9

         DESCRIPTION OF COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS FOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

      Set forth below is a description of the compensation arrangements for each
of our executive officers. The compensation arrangements consist of salary,
annual incentive compensation, equity awards and certain perquisites. Each of
our executive officers is an at-will employee of the company and we do not have
agreements with any of our executive officers except as set forth below.

      The cash salary and bonus payable to each executive officer for 2005 is
set forth below.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME AND POSITION     2005 BASE SALARY   2005 TARGET BONUS %
-----------------     ----------------   -------------------
<S>                   <C>                <C>
Gregg L. Engles       $      1,070,000                 120
Michelle P. Goolsby            470,000                  65
Barry A. Fromberg              435,000                  65
Ronald H. Klein                310,000                  50
Pete Schenkel                  676,832                  90
</TABLE>

      Annual cash bonus awards are determined in accordance with the Dean Foods
Company Executive Incentive Compensation Plan, which is filed as Exhibit 10.6 to
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. Awards of
equity compensation are made in accordance with our 1997 Seventh Amended and
Restated Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan and our 1989 Third Amended and
Restated Stock Award Plan (or any successor plans), filed as Exhibits 10.1 and
10.2, respectively, to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004.

      All executive officers are eligible to participate in our Post-2004
Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.3 to our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.

      Our executive officers are entitled to all benefits generally available to
all employees. In addition, our executive officers receive certain benefits
payable under our Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.8
to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, for the
benefit of employees who receive salary and cash bonus in excess of the amount
which IRS regulations allow to be taken into account under a 401K plan. Our
executives also receive an annual physical examination benefit. Certain
executive officers occasionally use our company planes for personal travel. Mr.
Schenkel receives an automobile allowance and certain club memberships. Also,
pursuant to certain agreements between Mr. Schenkel and our Southern Foods
subsidiary that pre-date our purchase of that business from Mr. Schenkel in
January 2000, Mr. Schenkel receives a lifetime supplemental health insurance
benefit for himself and his wife.

<PAGE>

      Finally, we have entered into certain Change in Control agreements with
our executive officers in the forms filed as Exhibits 10.18 and 10.19 to our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T20:47:23-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105-3901

Edie Chang, Deputy Executive Officer California Air Resources Board Post Office Box 2815

CA 

### 95812 

# JUL 18 2014

On May 13, 2014, CARB submitted revisions to the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). We have reviewed materials submitted with the following rules 

### and found that they fulfill the completeness criteria in 40 CFR 

### Part 51, AppendixV.

APCD/AQMD Rule # Rule Title Emissions from Stationary Internal Combustion Engines Antelope Valley 11 10 (Demonstration) Antelope Valley 1 113 Architectural Coatings Antelope Valley 1124 Aerospace Assembly and Component Manufacturing Operations Antelope Valley 1128 Paper, Fabric and Film Coating Operations Antelope Valley 1 130 Graphic Arts PlacerCounty 247 Natural Gas-FiredWaterHeaters, Small Boilers and Process Heaters PlacerCounty 249 Surface Coating ofPlastic Parts and Products PlacerCounty 502 New Source Review South Coast 219 Equipment Nor Requiring a Permit Pursuantto Regulation II Filing Requirements forspecific Emissions Sources Not Requiring a South Coast 222 Wntten Permit Pursuantto Regulation II San Joaquin Valley 4308 Boilers Steam Generators and Process Heaters

. Gasoline Transfer into Stationary Storage Containers Delivery San Joaquin Valley 4621 Vessels and BulkPlants San Joaquin Valley 4622 Gasoline Transferinto MotorVehicle Fuel Tanks San Joaquin Valley 4702 Internal Combustion Engines Ventura County 23 Exemptions from Permit Ventura County 54 SulfurCompounds Ventura County 74.31 Metalworking Fluids and Direct-Contact Lubricants
This addresses all ofthe rules from the May 13, 2014 submittal except forVentura Rule 42, which was withdrawn, and the other rules which we have addressed in recent correspondence. In the coming ~g~\1~O S~A~

~ ~

Printed on Recycled Paper

### months we will reviewthe complete revisions foraction pursuantto CleanAirAct section 110(k).

Mr. Michael Guzzetta, Manager, Rule Evaluation Section, CARB Mr. Tom Christofk, Air Pollution Control Officer, PlacerCountyAPCD Mr. Seyed Sadredin, Executive Director, San Joaquin ValleyAPCD Mr. Michael J. Villegas, Air Pollution Control Officer, Ventura CountyAPCD Dr. BarryWallerstein, Executive Director, South CoastAQMD Mr. Eldon Heaston, Executive Director, AntelopeValleyAQMD Questions regarding ourcompleteness review should be directed to Arnold Lazarus at (415) 972-3024.

Sent bye-mail Director, Air Division
Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

:\:.Iliun:!1 Bu~iness Ain'rnt'J A"SlICl;lIiQIl Eli ('olli 8/4/09 -

Rt'giulI.i1 Airlillt, Assuriatiun Dave Lotlerer 8/4/09 -

Airrr:lft Owner!. & !,Hols AssQrlaliul1 RQbC'rt l:Iackman 8/4/09 -

AT.-\ Craig F3biall 8/4109 -

J\TA ;\:1 LUPl';', 8/4/09 -
§ 249.19 Investigations. ( a ) *Authority.* FNS may make an investigation of any allegation of noncompliance with this part and FNS guidelines and instructions. The investigation may include, where appropriate, a review of pertinent practices and policies of any State and local agency, the circumstances under which the possible noncompliance with this part occurred, and other factors relevant to a determination as to whether the State and local agency has failed to comply with the requirements of this Part.
( b ) *Confidentiality.* No State or local agency, participant, or other person shall intimidate, threaten, coerce, or discriminate against any individual for the purpose of interfering with any right or privilege under this Part because that person has made a complaint or formal allegation, or has testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing under this Part. The identity of every complainant shall be kept confidential except to the extent necessary to carry out the purposes of this Part, including the conducting of any investigation, hearing, or judicial proceeding.
#### § 29.2545 Rework.

Any lot of Types 22 and 23 tobacco which needs to be resorted or otherwise reworked to prepare it properly for market, including: (a) Tobacco which is so mixed that it cannot be classified properly in any grade of the type, because the lot contains a substantial quantity of two or more distinctly different grades which should be separated by sorting; (b) tobacco which contains an abnormally large quantity of foreign matter or an unusual number of muddy or extremely dirty leaves which should be removed; and (c) tobacco not packed straight or otherwise not properly prepared for market. (See Rule 22, § 29.2638.)

[37 FR 13626, July 12, 1972. Redesignated and amended at 49 FR 16757, Apr. 20, 1984]
ctlI<nl Rf.l'lCES r4910-13-Pj 

### ~f~':':~~"'I0'· DEPARTMENT OFTR4.NSPORTAnON Federal Aviation Administration 

### 14CFR Part 39 

# file; [Docket No. 

### FAA-2009)****; Directorate Identifier 

### 2009-NM-116-AD) RtN 2120-AA64 ''''irIN(i ~\·M"O~ ANf'.-171 Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model CL-600-2CIO (Regional Jet Series 700, 701 & 702), CL-GOO-2DI5 (Regional Jet Series 705), and CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice ofproposed rulemaking (NPRM). SUMMARY: We propose to adopt anew airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above that would supersede an existing AD. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness infonnatioll (MeAl) originated by an aviation authority ofanother country to identify and correct anunsafe condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as: During testing, itwas discovered that when the outflow valve 

### (OFY) manual mode connector is not COlll1ccted,the manual mode motor and altitude limitation are not properly tested. Consequently, adisconnect of the OFV manual mode and/or arelated wiring failure could potentially result in adormant loss ofseveral CPC [cabin pressure control] backup/safety functions, including OFV manual control, altitude limitation, emergency depressurization and smoke clearance. *'*'*' Il<)UnNG SYMlIO,. ANE·171



### L'C/~ 

### """
- I

# ,ft-~;'1
"""nNG SYM"O~



### - 11'/ r~A"rnlr:'11

# ,j/ "'~/1~ 

# 0'1 -11>0 '~IllAl..SiS'~ 

## ~,l

* * * * 

## * * 

## * ".,," The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the unsafe condition described inthe MeAl.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JEFFREY S. WALLACE,

Plaintiff, CASE NO.: 4:03cv141-SPM

vs.

HENRY A. ALTMAN, et al.,

Defendants,

STANLEY AND MARGARET BOOSE, et al.,

Third-Party Plaintiffs,

vs.

CENDANT GLOBAL SERVICES, INC.,

successor-in-interest to CENDANT

GLOBAL SERVICES B.V. by assignment, et al.,

Third-Party Defendants.

_______________________________________/

ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO RESPOND TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT

For good cause shown, Cendant Global Services, Inc.’s motion for

enlargement of time (doc. 124) is granted. Cendant Global Services shall have

up to and including July 8, 2005 to respond to the pending motion for summary

judgment. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 5th day of July, 2005.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 4:03-cv-00141-SPM-AK Document 125 Filed 07/05/05 Page 1 of 1
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


TYPE:  EX-27
 SEQUENCE:  2
 DESCRIPTION:  FINANCIAL  DATA  SCHEDULE


 ARTICLE:                       5


 PERIOD  TYPE:                     YEAR
 FISCAL  YEAR  END:                 FEB-29-2000
 PERIOD  START:                    MAR-01-1999
 PERIOD  END:                      FEB-29-2000
 CASH:                                  1,408
 SECURITIES:                                0
 RECEIVABLES:                             565
 ALLOWANCES:                                0
 INVENTORY:                             8,673
 CURRENT  ASSETS:                       10,646
 PP&E:                                 20,304
 DEPRECIATION:                         18,542
 TOTAL  ASSETS:                         96,638
 CURRENT  LIABILITIES:                 474,634
 BONDS:                                     0
 PREFERRED  MANDATORY:                      0
 PREFERRED:                                 0
 COMMON:                               20,998
 OTHER  SE:                          (398,994)
 TOTAL  LIABILITY  AND  EQUITY:        96,638
 SALES:                                18,048
 TOTAL  REVENUES:                      18,408
 CGS:                                   4,420
 TOTAL  COSTS:                          4,420
 OTHER  EXPENSES:                     128,058
 LOSS  PROVISION:                           0
 INTEREST  EXPENSE:                    11,848
 INCOME  PRETAX:                     (125,918)
 INCOME  TAX:                               0
 INCOME  CONTINUING:                 (125,918)
 DISCONTINUED:                              0
 EXTRAORDINARY:                             0
 CHANGES:                                   0
 NET  INCOME:                         (125,918)
 EPS  BASIC:                              (.31)
 EPS  DILUTED:                            (.31)

<PAGE>

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification of CFO Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation for the quarter ended March 31,2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,Andrea K. Tarbox, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of KapStone Paperand Packaging Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation.

 
| Dated:  May 5, 2008 |   |                                       |   |
|--------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|                     |   |                                       |   |
|                     | By:    | /s/ Andrea K. Tarbox                       |
|                     |   | Andrea K. Tarbox                           |
|                     |   | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----