alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Robert E. Swanson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ridgewood Energy P
Fund, LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Dated:       November 30, 2006

        /s/  ROBERT E. SWANSON
      Name:  Robert E. Swanson

     Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer
             (Principal Executive Officer)
|  |
|--|

December 21, 2000

**Legal Immigration Family Equity Act**

Today, President Clinton signed a major immigration legislative package called the Legal Immigration Family Equity Act (LIFE) into law.  This is alternative legislation to the Latino Immigration Fairness Act (LIFA) that was previously proposed.  The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) is developing guidance for implementation of this new law, which will include instructions on how to apply under the new provisions.

Among the changes in the law are the following:
- Section 245(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act will be available temporarily to people physically present in the United States on the date of enactment, December 21, 2000.  The provision will allow a person who qualifies for permanent residency, but is ineligible to adjust status in the United States because of an immigration status violation, to pay a $1,000 penalty to continue processing in the United States.  In order to be eligible for 245(i) adjustment under the LIFE Act, a person must be the beneficiary of an immigrant petition or application for labor certification filed on or before April 30, 2001.    A new temporary "V" non-immigrant status will be available to the spouses and minor children of lawful permanent residents waiting more than three years for an immigrant visa based upon an immigrant petition filed on or before the enactment date of the LIFE Act.  Persons granted "V" status would receive employment authorization and are protected from removal. A new temporary "K" visa status will be available to spouses of U.S. citizens (and their children) living abroad.  The current K visa is only available to fiancées of U.S. citizens who are coming to the United States to get married within 90 days of arrival. 
- Persons who filed before October 1, 2000, for class membership in one of three "late amnesty" lawsuits (CSS v. Meese, LULAC v. INS, and Zambrano v. INS) and who are eligible under the LIFE Act's amended legalization provisions may apply to adjust status during a 12-month period that begins once regulations are issued.  Spouses and unmarried children of the class action claimants will be protected from certain categories of removal and will be eligible for work authorization if they entered the United States before December 1, 1988 and resided in the United States on that date.  — INS —          Last Modified 02/20/2003
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:98cr125/RV

WILLIAM EVERETT ROBINSON

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Senior Judge Roger Vinson on August 9, 2004 

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION for reconsideration of ORDER (doc. 90) Denying [89] Motion:

Request to Answer A Question As to A Defect In The Proceedings, Denial of Direct Appeal 

Filed by Defendant on 8/5/2005 Doc.# 91 

 

RESPONSES:

 United States on 12/15/2004 Doc.# 309

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

 Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

 s/Jerry Marbut

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Jerry Marbut

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 10th day of

 August , 2005, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) 

 /s/ Roger Vinson

ROGER VINSON

United States District Judge

Case 3:98-cr-00125-RV-MD Document 92 Filed 08/10/05 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Section 906Certification**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), the undersignedofficer of Guaranty Bancorp (the “Company”) hereby certifies that theCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

Dated: November 2,2010

 

 
|   | /s/   Paul  W. Taylor |
|--------|--------------------------------------|
|   | Name:                                | Paul W. Taylor |
|   | Title:                               | *Chief Financial  and Operating Officer and Secretary* |

 

The foregoing certification isbeing furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) and is not being filed as part of theReport or as a separate disclosure document.

 

1

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS  ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, John C. Textor, Chief Executive Officer of BabyUniverse, Inc. (the “Company”) in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)     the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)     the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 14th day of November 2005. 

|   |   | */s/ John C. Textor*      |
|--------|--------|---------------------------|
|   |   |                           |
|   |   | *John C. Textor*          |
|   |   | *Chief Executive Officer* |
# Recent Publications

-                  Institute for Telecommunication Sciences,                “ISART 2022: Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium on Advanced Radio Technologies: Evolving Spectrum-Sharing Regulation through Data-, Science-, and Technology-Driven Analysis and Decision-making,”Conference Proceedings NITA SP-24-573,                 August 2024              
                        The topic of the 2022 International Symposium on Advanced Radio TechnologiesTM (ISART 2022), which took place fully virtually June 13, 14, 15, and 16, 2022, was “Evolving Spectrum-Sharing Regulation through Data-, Science-, and Technology-Driven Analy...                    
 
-                  Jaden  Pieper and Stephen D. Voran,                “AlignNet: Learning Dataset Score Alignment Functions To Enable Better Training of Speech Quality Estimators,”Conference Paper,                 July 2024              
                        We develop two complementary advances for training no-reference (NR) speech quality estimators with independent datasets. Multi-dataset finetuning (MDF) pretrains an NR estimator on a single dataset and then finetunes it on multiple datasets at once,...                    
 
-                  Jaden  Pieper, Stephen D. Voran,  and  Kenneth R.  Tilley,                “Improving Speech Audio for Prerecorded and Live Online Conference Sessions,”Special Publication NTIA SP 24-572,                 July 2024              
                        Learn how to identify impaired speech and avoid its causes. Listen to audio clips that demonstrate six useful tips for online conference and meeting organizers, as well as contributors who plan to speak during a live online event or submit a pre-reco...                    
 
-                  Jaden  Pieper and Stephen D. Voran,                “Joint Analyses of No-Reference Speech Quality Estimation Tools and Conference Speech Recorded in Diverse Real-World Conditions,”Technical Memorandum NTIA TM-24-571,                 July 2024              
                        Recently, prerecorded audio and video presentations, as well as virtual meetings, have become a common component of professional life, due to health and environmental considerations. This places new responsibility on participants to generate audio th...
#### § 29.1039 No-G-F.

A designation applied to a lot of tobacco that contains stalks, suckers, or foreign matter. (See Rule 24.)

[42 FR 21092, Apr. 25, 1977. Redesignated at 48 FR 29671, June 28, 1983, 49 FR 16756, Apr. 20, 1984, and 51 FR 25027, July 10, 1986]
Sanitized – Attachment 008 

Page 1 of 5
Sanitized – Attachment 008 

Page 2 of 5
Sanitized – Attachment 008 

Page 3 of 5
Sanitized – Attachment 008 

Page 4 of 5
Sanitized – Attachment 008 

Page 5 of 5
Fact Sheet 

The President’s Fiscal 2002 Immigration Budget 

4/9/01 

Detention and Removals

The FY 2002 budget includes $88.8 million and 127 new positions to strengthen 

efforts to identify and remove criminal aliens by increasing and improving detention 

space and transportation. INS is also seeking 46 positions in its Legal Proceedings 

Program to assist the U.S. Attorneys’ Offices and the Office of Immigration Litigation in 

immigration-related matters arising in federal courts. 

Consolidated Detention Bed Space 

To continue to meet the mandatory detention requirements of the Illegal 

Immigration and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, the budget requests 127 

positions (68 Detention Enforcement Officers, 33 Deportation Officers and 26 support 

positions) and an additional 1,607 average daily state and local detention bed spaces. 

This initiative includes resources to detain, remove and transport aliens. ($68.4 million) 

National Transportation System 

The budget includes an increase of $8.8 million to fund the costs associated with 

the INS share of the Justice Prisoner and Alien Transportation System (JPATS). This 

increase, when combined with current funding, will fund an estimated 84,000 air 

movements to transfer or repatriate detainees. JPATS, created in 1995 by INS and the 

U.S. Marshals Service, is an air transportation system used to transfer or repatriate 

federal prisoners and detainees. ($8.8 million) 

Public Health 

The budget includes funding of $8.7 million to support the increased cost of 

providing detainees health care and to continue the expansion of the tuberculosis 

testing pilot program. INS is committed to ensuring that its facilities are safe and 

humane, and that adequate medical care is provided to aliens in its custody. Further, in 

expanding a tuberculosis testing program that provides results in a matter of hours 

rather than days, INS will be able to ensure that detainees, employees and the public are 

safeguarded from disease. ($8.7 million) 

Coordination with U.S. Attorneys 

The budget requests 46 positions (31 attorneys and 15 support personnel) to 

enable INS to assist the U.S. Attorneys Offices and the Office of Immigration Litigation 

in immigration-related matters arising in federal courts. The litigation efforts will 

facilitate the removal of detained aliens, a substantial number of which are criminal 

aliens. It will also ensure that aliens not eligible for immigration benefits are 

appropriately identified and denied any benefit. ($2.9 million) 

Prepared by the Office of Public Affairs • Immigration & Naturalization Service • (202) 514-2648
FY 2002 INS Budget – Detention and Removal 

Page 2 

FY 2002 Initiatives 

($ in millions) 

Initiative S&E User Fee BB/DF Total 

Consolidated Detention Bed Space $21.9 $6.5 $40.0 $68.4 

National Transportation System 8.8 – – 8.8 

Public Health 8.7 – – 8.7 

Coordination with U.S. Attorneys 2.9 – – 2.9 

TOTAL $42.3 $6.5 $40.0 $88.8
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996<F1>
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,832
<SECURITIES>                                     4,100
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,306
<ALLOWANCES>                                       245
<INVENTORY>                                      5,639
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,311
<PP&E>                                          10,405
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,836
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  27,584
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,762
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           178
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,173
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    27,584
<SALES>                                         31,477
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,477
<CGS>                                           13,096
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,096
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   110
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 147
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,519
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,611
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,908
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,908
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .78
<FN>
<F1>THE RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO REFLECT ANY 
CHANGES DUE TO FAS 128.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Barge Line Company (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christopher A. Black, Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.                        /s/       Christopher A. Black   Christopher A. Black   Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer   November 13, 2006
74
Case 3:98-cv-00179-LC   Document 216   Filed 10/11/06   Page 1 of 13

Case 3:98-cv-00179-LC   Document 216   Filed 10/11/06   Page 2 of 13

Case 3:98-cv-00179-LC   Document 216   Filed 10/11/06   Page 3 of 13

Case 3:98-cv-00179-LC   Document 216   Filed 10/11/06   Page 4 of 13

Case 3:98-cv-00179-LC   Document 216   Filed 10/11/06   Page 5 of 13

Case 3:98-cv-00179-LC   Document 216   Filed 10/11/06   Page 6 of 13

Case 3:98-cv-00179-LC   Document 216   Filed 10/11/06   Page 7 of 13

Case 3:98-cv-00179-LC   Document 216   Filed 10/11/06   Page 8 of 13

Case 3:98-cv-00179-LC   Document 216   Filed 10/11/06   Page 9 of 13

Case 3:98-cv-00179-LC   Document 216   Filed 10/11/06   Page 10 of 13

Case 3:98-cv-00179-LC   Document 216   Filed 10/11/06   Page 11 of 13

Case 3:98-cv-00179-LC   Document 216   Filed 10/11/06   Page 12 of 13

Case 3:98-cv-00179-LC   Document 216   Filed 10/11/06   Page 13 of 13
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Eldred, Appellant.

[Cite as *State v. Eldred*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 565.]

(No. 98-816

Submitted October 13, 1998

Decided November 18, 1998.)

*Joseph T. Deters,*Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and *Paula E. Adams,*Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

*Schuh & Goldberg*and *Raul E. Tellez,*for appellant.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of *State v. Cook*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570.

The cause is remanded to the trial court to properly direct processing of the defendant by the official in charge of the state correctional institution where the defendant is committed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
#### James Talcott, Inc., Appellant, v. Wilson Hosiery Co., Inc., et al., Respondents.

Orders entered 'September 6, 1968 and December 9, 1968 unanimously reversed on the law; plaintiff’s motion to strike the jury demand granted, and the case transferred to the nonjury calendar, with $30 costs and disbursements to the appellant. Plaintiff-appellant, a commercial factoring company, *525seeks recovery of the sum. of approximately $130,000 arising out of plaintiff’s factoring of accounts receivable assigned to it by its former factored client, the corporate defendant-respondent. In a written factoring agreement and guarantee, the parties mutually waived their right to a trial by jury in clear terms as follows: (The Factoring Agreement): “ You [Talcott] and the undersigned [Wilson Hosiery] do both hereby waive any and all right to a trial by jury in any action or proceeding arising herefrom or based hereon." (In the Guaranty): "We do hereby waive any and all right to a trial by jury in any action or proceeding based hereon.” Defendant-respondent Murray Wilson in his opposing affidavit admits reading the factoring agreement and guarantee. No question is raised about the execution and delivery of the agreement and guarantee. The only claim by respondents below was that they were unaware that each instrument contained a jury waiver provision. No claim of deceit is made. The provisions for jury waiver are set forth in the same size of the printed type as every other provision of the documents. No claim has been made that the provision is illegible nor is it printed in such small print as to be unnotieeable or unreadable. The court below denied the motion to strike the jury demand upon the sole claim of the respondents that they had been une mre that each instrument contained a jury waiver provision. In so doing the court erred. “ Ordinarily, the signer of a deed or other instrument, expressive of a jural act is conclusively bound thereby. That his mind never gave assent to the terms expressed is not material.” *(Pimpinello*v. *Swift & Co.,*253 N. Y. 159,162.) “Not to have read the contract or to have had it read to him before signing, if that be a fact as he testified, furnishes no basis for his repudiation of any of its terms *(Dambmann*v. *Schulting,*75 N. Y. 55, 61; *Pimpinello*v. *Swift & Co.,*253 N. Y. 159, 162, 163.)” *(Amend*v. *Hurley,*293 N. Y. 587, 595.) The jury waivers in the factoring agreement and guarantee are enforceable and must be given effect *(Franklin National Bank of Long Is.*v. *Capobianco, 25*A D 2d 445; *Security Nat. Bank of Long Is.*v. *Estatio,*29 A D 2d 887; *Bonnie-Lassie Sportswear*v. *Century Factors,*283 App. Div. 702; *Freeman v*. *Island Discount Corp.,*5 A D 2d 778; *Caplan*v. *Goldman,*197 Misc. 404, affd. 278 App. Div. 807). Concur—Eager, J. P., McGivem, Markewich, Nunez and Steuer, JU.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1403

LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

TRANSAMERICA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,

WESTERN RESERVE LIFE ASSURANCE CO. OF OHIO,

and TRANSAMERICA FINANCIAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendants-Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa

in 06-CV-110, Judge Mark W. Bennett.

ON MOTION

Before BRYSON Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Transamerica Life Insurance Company et al. (Transamerica) move "for a

temporary stay until this Court rules on Transamerica's forthcoming motion for a stay

pending appeal."

Transamerica requests that it be permitted to file a motion for stay of the district

court's injunction on June 19, 2009 in this court, and that the injunction be stayed

beyond that date and until this court rules on that motion, which has not yet been filed.

Transamerica has not shown that it should be permitted to obtain a temporary

stay of the injunction pending the filing of a motion for a stay pending appeal.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:
The motion for a temporary stay is denied without prejudice to Transamerica

requesting such relief when it files its motion for a stay pending appeal.

FOR THE COURT

JUN 17 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Date Jan Horbaly

Clerk Ultgreildhty011

cc:	Dale Randall Brown, Esq.

John Kenneth Felter, Esq.

s8

JUN 1 7 2009

ku., 'Ultra

CLERK

2009-1403	- 2 -