alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter C of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter C appear by Amdt. 381, 65 FR 64586, Oct. 30, 2000.

###### Editorial Note on Part 281

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 281 appear at 78 FR 11972, Feb. 21, 2013.

#### § 281.7 Indian tribal organization failure.

When Performance Reporting System reviews indicate that continuing deficiencies exist and corrective action proposals (including training and technical assistance to overcome these deficiencies), and/or appropriate sanctions have not, in the opinion of FNS, resulted in a sufficient degree of improvement, FNS will conduct a review to determine if the ITO has failed to properly administer SNAP. FNS shall examine the relevant factors specified in § 281.3(b)(1) and shall follow the notification and determination procedures set forth in § 281.3 (c) and (d). If ITO failure is determined, FNS shall require the appropriate agency of the State government to resume administration of the Program on the reservation in accordance with an approved termination and transition arrangement.
Exhibit 99.1



                         Section 906 Certification
                         -------------------------

        The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany
the Form 10-Q for The Willowbridge Fund L.P. pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350).

        The undersigned certifies in his capacity as an officer of Ruvane
Investment Corporation, the general partner of The Willowbridge Fund. L.P.,
that the foregoing Report on Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and
that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
material respects, the fnancial condition and results of operations of The
Willowbridge Fund L.P. for the period in question.



/s/ Robert L. Lerner
----------------------
Robert L. Lerner
President
Ruvane Investment Corporation, the general
partner of The Willowbridge Fund, L.P.
II 

Calendar No. 388 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2391 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 25, 2014 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

MAY 21, 2014 

Reported by Mr. CARPER, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 5323 Highway N in Cottleville, Missouri as 

the ‘‘Lance Corporal Phillip Vinnedge Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LANCE CORPORAL PHILLIP D. VINNEDGE POST 

4 OFFICE. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 5323 Highway N in Cottleville, 

7 Missouri, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Lance 

8 Corporal Phillip Vinnedge Post Office’’. 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2391 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any references in a law, map, 

2 regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lance Corporal Phillip 

5 Vinnedge Post Office’’. 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS

TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 388 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2391 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postlip Vinnedge Post Office’’. Cottleville, Missouri as the ‘‘Lance Corporal Phil- al Service located at 5323 Highway N in 

MAY 21, 2014 

Reported without amendment 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### § 29.6019 Grademark.

In these types a grademark normally consists of a letter to indicate group and a number to indicate quality. For example, B2 means Binder, fair quality.
*Friday, October 30, 1998*

MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET

98-2266.

#### In re Judicial Campaign Complaint Against Burick.

BEFORE THE COMMISSION OF FIVE JUDGES APPOINTED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

In re Judicial Campaign Complaint 98-2266 Against Elizabeth Burick

ORDER

Pursuant to Rule II, Section 6(E)(1) of the Supreme Court Rules for the Government of the Judiciary of Ohio, the five-judge commission appointed to consider the above-cited matter met by telephone conference on October 30, 1998 to consider the report of the hearing panel of the. Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline filed with the Supreme Court of Ohio on October 27, 1998.

Having considered the report of the hearing panel and the record in this proceeding to date, the five-judge commission hereby issues an interim order that the respondent cease and desist from posting, publishing, broadcasting, transmitting, or distributing any campaign literature and advertisements containing statements that were found by the hearing panel to be in violation of Canon 7 of the Code of Judicial Conduct. This interim order is issued based *on the*recommendation of the hearing panel. The commission acknowledges the respondent’s efforts to comply with the report and recommendations of the hearing panel, as evidenced by the certifications filed with the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline on October 27, 1998 and the five-judge commission on October 28,1998 and October 30,1998.

*1471The five-judge commission further orders that the parties may file written briefs not to exceed fifteen pages with the Clerk of the Supreme Court no later than November 13,1998. The parties may file reply briefs not to exceed ten pages no later than November 23, 1998. In addition to any other matters raised by the parties, the briefs shall address the issue of the complainant’s entitlement to reasonable and necessary attorney’s fees incurred by him in prosecuting this grievance. If fees are determined by the commission to be appropriate, additional documentation will be requested from the parties. Briefs shall be filed in the manner set forth in the Supreme Court’s order of October 27, 1998 appointing the five-judge commission with a copy served on opposing counsel.

BY ORDER OF THE COMMISSION.

Richard A. Dove

Secretary of the Commission

Dated: October 30,1998
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCTS

Case No. 3:19md2885

LIABILITY LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

McCombs, 7:20cv94

Judge M. Casey Rodgers

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones

DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS ORDER NO. 1

This Order addresses Defendants’ objections and counter-designations to 

Plaintiff’s affirmative deposition designations and Plaintiff’s objections to 

Defendants’ counter-designations thereto for the following witness depositions: 

1. Putney, K. 10-07-2020

2. Thompson, Z. 10-07-2020

SO ORDERED, on this 5th day of May, 2021.

M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 7:20-cv-00094-MCR-GRJ Document 100 Filed 05/05/21 Page 1 of 1
§ 1786.100 Application procedure. Any borrower seeking to prepay its RUS Notes under this Subpart should apply to the appropriate RUS Area Director not less than 60 days prior to one year after the effective date of the merger or consolidation by submitting: ( a ) A board resolution that: ( 1 ) Requests approval of the prepayment of the borrower's outstanding RUS Notes;
( 2 ) States the intent of the borrower to comply with all eligibility criteria set forth in § 1786.99 of this subpart; and
( 3 ) Identifies the source of financing.
( b ) A list of all RUS Notes together with the outstanding amount on such notes.
( c ) An opinion of counsel as to the effective date of the merger or consolidation.
( d ) Such additional information as the Administrator will request.
#### § 253.1 General purpose and scope.

This part describes the terms and conditions under which: commodities (available under part 250 of this chapter) may be distributed to households on or near all or any part of any Indian reservation, the program may be administered by capable Indian tribal organizations, and funds may be obtained from the Department for the costs incurred in administering the program. This part also provides for the concurrent operation of the Food Distribution Program and the Food Stamp Program on Indian reservations when such concurrent operation is requested by an ITO.
#### § 201.38 [Reserved]
#### Luba Kukawka, Respondent, v. Israel Kukawka, Also Known as Sol Kafka, Appellant.

Order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated October 18, 1966, modified by (1) striking out of its second decretal paragraph that the weekly support payments directed to be made therein shall commence as of September 27, 1965 (the return date of the motion) and (2) substituting therefor a provision that the payments shall be made commencing as of October 18, 1966. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. On the record before us, it is our opinion that, in view of the conflicting affidavits submitted, the question of plaintiff’s expenses and outlays for the period between the return date of her motion and the date of the order now before us should be left to the trial court to determine in its judgment after trial. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Rabin and Munder, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**  **18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
      THE**  **SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Arrow Resources Development,
      Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter
      J. Frugone, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)
        the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
        the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




April
      2,
      2007


/s/ Peter
              J.
              FrugonePeter
                J. FrugoneChief
                Executive Officer
#### § 29.2661 Wrappers (A Group).

This group consists of leaves usually grown at or above the center portion of the stalk. Cured leaves of this group are elastic and show a low percentage of injury affecting wrapper yield.

| Grades | Grade names and specifications |
| --- | --- |
| A1F | Choice Medium-brown Wrappers. |
| | Thin to medium body, ripe, firm, rich in oil, elastic, strong, bright finish, deep color intensity, spready, 90 percent uniform, and 10 percent of leaves not lower than B1 or C1. |
| A2F | Fine Medium-brown Wrappers. |
| | Thin to medium body, ripe, firm, rich in oil, elastic, strong, bright finish, deep color intensity, spready, 75 percent uniform, and 25 percent of leaves not lower than B2 or C2. |
| A3F | Good Medium-brown Wrappers. |
| | Thin to medium body, ripe, firm oily, elastic, strong, clear finish, moderate color intensity, spready, 60 percent uniform, and 40 percent of leaves not lower than B3 or C3. |
| A1D | Choice Dark-brown Wrappers. |
| | Thin to heavy body, ripe, firm, rich in oil, elastic, strong, bright finish, deep color intensity, spready, 90 percent uniform, and 10 percent of leaves not lower than B1 or C1. |
| A2D | Fine Dark-brown Wrappers. |
| | Thin to heavy body, ripe, firm, rich in oil, elastic, strong, bright finish, deep color intensity, spready, 75 percent uniform, and 25 percent of leaves not lower than B2 or C2. |
| A3D | Good Dark-brown Wrappers. |
| | Thin to heavy body, ripe, firm, oily, elastic, strong, clear finish, moderate color intensity, spready, 60 percent uniform, and 40 percent of leaves not lower than B3 or C3. |

[37 FR 13626, July 12, 1972, as amended at 49 FR 16757, Apr. 20, 1984]
#### § 29.2301 Stem.

The midrib or large central vein of a tobacco leaf.

[37 FR 13521, July 11, 1972. Redesignated at 51 FR 40406, Nov. 7, 1986]
98-219.

#### Pretty v. Mueller.

Hamilton App. Nos. C-970011 and C-970332. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. Upon consideration of appellees’ notice of lifting of the automatic stay in the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that the stay previously granted by this court be, and hereby is, lifted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that appellees’ memorandum in response is due within thirty days of the date of this entry.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 3, 2017

Order 

Clerk

March 3, 2017

153828(64)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 153828

v COA: 324018 

Wayne CC: 14-000152-FC

THEODORE PAUL WAFER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff-appellee to extend the time 

for filing its supplemental brief is GRANTED IN PART. The supplemental brief will be

accepted as timely filed if submitted on or before March 28, 2017. The due date of 

defendant-appellant’s supplemental brief is also extended to March 28, 2017.
§ 319.69a Administrative instructions and interpretation relating to the entry into Guam of plant materials specified in § 319.69. ( a ) Plants and products designated in § 319.69(a)(1), (3), (4), and (5) and (b)(1) and (3) as prohibited or restricted entry into the United States from the countries and localities named may be imported into Guam as packing materials without prohibition or restriction under this subpart. Inspection of such importations may be made under the general authority of § 330.105(a) of this chapter. If an importation is found infected, infested, or contaminated with any plant pest and is not subject to disposal under this part, disposition may be made in accordance with § 330.106 of this chapter.
( b ) Corn and allied plants listed in § 319.69(a)(2) may be imported into Guam subject to the requirements of §§ 319.69-2, 319.69-3, and 319.69-4.
( c ) Under § 319.69(a) (6) and (7), coconut fronds and other parts of the coconut trees are prohibited entry into Guam as packing materials except as permitted in § 319.37-11.
[24 FR 10788, Dec. 29, 1959, as amended at 60 FR 27682, May 25, 1995; 62 FR 65009, Dec. 10, 1997; 83 FR 11866, Mar. 19, 2018]
Editorial Note on Subchapter C of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter C appear by Amdt. 381, 65 FR 64586, Oct. 30, 2000.

Editorial Note on Part 277
Editorial Note: OMB control numbers relating to this part 277 are contained in § 271.8.

§ 277.7 Cash depositories. ( a ) The term “cash depositories” refers to banks or other institutions which maintain accounts where SNAP funds are deposited and from which withdrawals are made to meet administrative costs of the State agency.
( b ) State agencies are encouraged to use minority owned banks to expand opportunities for minority enterprises.
( c ) FNS shall not: ( 1 ) Require physical segregation in a cash depository of program funds from other State agency funds.
( 2 ) Establish any eligibility requirements for cash depositories in which program funds are deposited by the State agency.
#### § 319.73-4 Costs.

All costs of inspection, packing materials, handling, cleaning, safeguarding, treating, or other disposal of products or articles under this subpart will be borne by the owner, importer, or agent of the owner or importer, including a broker. The services of an inspector during regularly assigned hours of duty and at the usual places of duty will be furnished without cost to the importer.
##### 



Exhibit 10.7
 WORKING CAPITAL LOAN AGREEMENT
  Loan.
 Term.
 Early Termination




---



##### 



Procedure for Borrowing. ,
 Revolving Nature and Availability
 Conditions of Loans.
   Interest.
 Prepayment.
 . Default.




---



##### 



Acceleration at Option of Lender.
 Binding Effect.
 Loan Expenses.
 Commitment Fee.
 Non-Waiver.
 Governing Law.
 Headings.




---



##### 



Counterparts.
 Time of Essence.
 Entire Agreement; Modification.
 Notices.
 No Third Party Beneficiaries
 Special Exculpation
 Waiver of Jury Trial
 Indemnification
 Severability




---



##### 



Further Assurances
 Interest Rate Limitation. Charges Maximum Rate




---



##### 



The Williams Companies, Inc.By:
    
    /s/ Donald R. ChappelName:
    
    Donald R. ChappelTitle:
    
    Senior Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer
 Williams Partners L.P.By:
    
    Williams Partners GP LLC,it general partnerby:
    
    /s/ Alan S. ArmstrongName:
    
    Alan S. ArmstrongTitle:
    
    Chief Operating Officer
Editorial Note on Subchapter C of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter C appear by Amdt. 381, 65 FR 64586, Oct. 30, 2000.

§ 282.1 Legislative authority and notice requirements. ( a ) *Legislative authority.* Section 17 of the Act authorizes the Secretary to conduct demonstration, research, and evaluation projects. In conducting such projects, the Secretary may waive all or part of the requirements of the Act and implementing regulations necessary to conduct such projects, except that no project, other than a project involving the payment of the average value of allotments by household size in the form of cash to eligible households or a project conducted to test improved consistency or coordination between the SNAP employment and training program and the Job Opportunities and Basic Skills program under Title IV of the Social Security Act, may be undertaken which would lower or further restrict the established income and resource standards or benefit levels.
( b ) *Notices.* At least 30 days prior to the initiation of a demonstration project, FNS shall publish a General Notice in the Federal Register if the demonstration project will likely have a significant impact on the public. The notice shall set forth the specific operational procedures and shall explain the basis and purpose of the demonstration project. If significant comments are received in response to this General Notice, the Department will take such action as may be appropriate prior to implementing the project. If the operational procedures contained in the General Notice described above are significantly changed because of comments, an amended General Notice will be published in the Federal Register at least 30 days prior to the initiation of the demonstration project, except where good cause exists supporting a shorter effective date. The explanation for the determination of good cause will be published with the amended General Notice. The amended General Notice will also explain the basis and purpose of the change.
[Amdt. 371, 61 FR 60012, Nov. 26, 1996]
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1978 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1978

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the phasedown of 
        the credit percentage for the dependent care tax credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 14, 2013

Ms. Schwartz (for herself and Mr. Kind) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the phasedown of 
        the credit percentage for the dependent care tax credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Support Working Parents Act of 
2013''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF PHASEDOWN OF CREDIT PERCENTAGE FOR DEPENDENT CARE 
              CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (a) of section 21 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to expenses for household and dependent 
care services necessary for gainful employment) is amended to read as 
follows:
    ``(a) Allowance of Credit.--In the case of an individual for which 
there are 1 or more qualifying individuals with respect to such 
individual, there shall be allowed as a credit against the tax imposed 
by this chapter for the taxable year an amount equal to 35 percent of 
the employment-related expenses paid by such individual during the 
taxable year.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 28.424 Strict Low Middling Spotted Color.

Strict Low Middling Spotted Color is color which is within the range represented by a set of samples in the custody of the United States Department of Agriculture in a container marked “Original Official Cotton Standards of the United States, American Upland, Strict Low Middling Spotted, effective July 1, 1987.”
#### § 29.2571 Width.

The relative breadth of a tobacco leaf expressed in relation to its length. Width, as an element of quality, does not apply to tobacco in strip form. (See chart, § 29.2601.)

[37 FR 13626, July 12, 1972. Redesignated and amended at 49 FR 16757, Apr. 20, 1984 and further redesignated at 51 FR 40406, Nov. 7, 1986]
#### § 29.6010 Cured.

Tobacco dried of its sap by either natural or artificial processes.
#### § 29.1040 No-G-Nested.

A designation applied to a lot of Types 11-14 tobacco which is classified as nested. (See Rule 27.)

[47 FR 51721, Nov. 17, 1982. Redesignated at 48 FR 29671, June 28, 1983. Redesignated and amended at 49 FR 16756, Apr. 20, 1984, and further redesignated at 51 FR 25027, July 10, 1986]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

ISAAC GREEN,

Petitioner,

vs. CASE NO.: 4:02cv323-SPM/AK

JAMES CROSBY,

Respondent.

_______________________/

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s report

and recommendation (doc. 39) dated October 5, 2005. Petitioner has been

furnished a copy and he has filed objections (doc. 42).

Pursuant to Tile 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), I have made a

de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been made. I

find that the report of the magistrate judge should be adopted. Petitioner’s

objections provide no new information that call into question the reasoning of the

report and recommendation. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (doc. 39) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is

Case 4:02-cv-00323-SPM-AK Document 43 Filed 11/28/05 Page 1 of 2
denied. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 28th day of November, 2005.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 4:02-cv-00323-SPM-AK Document 43 Filed 11/28/05 Page 2 of 2
2006-0495.

#### State v. Tomlinson.

Franklin App. No. 05AP-1291. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted.

Moyer, C. J., Resnicic and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.
#### State Division of Human Rights, on the Complaint of Mary L. McLary, Respondent, v Marine Midland Bank, Petitioner.

Petition unanimously granted to the extent that order of appeal board is annulled, on the law, with costs, and proceeding remitted to the board for a determination on the merits. (See *Matter of Navarro v State Human Rights Appeal Bd.,*72 AD2d 680.) (Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law, § 298.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Schnepp, Callahan and Witmer, JJ.