alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS EARPLUG ) Case No: 3:19-md-02885 

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION ) 

 ) Judge M. Casey Rodgers 

 ) Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones 

This Document Relates to All Cases ) 

_____________________________________________________________________________ 

MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE 

 Pursuant to Pretrial Order No. 3 and the Northern District of Florida Local Rule 11.1, I, 

Paul J. Pennock, hereby moves this Court for an Order for admission to practice pro hac vice in 

the above-styled matter, and, in support thereof, state as follows: 

 1. Movant resides in New Jersey and is not a resident of the State of Florida. 

 2. Movant is admitted to practice and is a member in good standing of the bar of the 

States of New York. A copy of a Certificate of Good Standing from the State of New York 

dated within 30 days of this motion is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and made a part hereof. 

 3. Pursuant to Pretrial Order No. 3 and Local Rule 11.1, Movant has successfully 

completed both the online Local Rules tutorial exam, confirmation number 

FLND15580430232217, and the CM/ECF online tutorials. 

 4. Movant has submitted to the Clerk the required $201.00 pro hac vice admission 

fee. 

 5. Movant has upgraded his PACER account to “NextGen.” 

 6. Movant represents the Plaintiffs in the following actions that were filed 

independent of the JPML transfer process: 

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 366 Filed 05/20/19 Page 1 of 3
 • Formoso v. 3M Company, 3:19-cv-01497-MCR-GRJ; and 

• McNaughton v. 3M Company, 1:19-cv-00541-LMB-JFA (pending transfer from 

Eastern District of Virginia) 

 WHEREFORE, Paul J. Pennock, respectfully requests that this Court enter an order 

granting this motion to appear pro hac vice. 

Dated: May 20, 2019 

 By: /s/ Paul J. Pennock 

 Paul J. Pennock 

 Weitz & Luxenberg, P.C. 

 700 Broadway 

 New York, NY 10003 

 Tel: (212) 558-5549 

 Fax: (212) 344-5461 

 Email: ppennock@weitxlux.com 

 

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 366 Filed 05/20/19 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 The undersigned, an attorney, certifies that the foregoing Motion for Admission Pro Hac 

Vice was filed electronically with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system on May 20, 

2019 and served electronically on all counsel of record. 

 /s/ Paul J. Pennock 

 Paul J. Pennock 

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 366 Filed 05/20/19 Page 3 of 3
§ 301.32-3 Quarantined areas. ( a ) *Designation of quarantined areas.* In accordance with the criteria listed in paragraph (c) of this section, the Administrator will designate as a quarantined area each State, or each portion of a State, in which a fruit fly population subject to the regulations in this subpart has been found by an inspector, or in which the Administrator has reason to believe that a fruit fly population is present, or that the Administrator considers necessary to quarantine because of its inseparability for quarantine enforcement purposes from localities in which a fruit fly population has been found. The Administrator will publish the description of the quarantined area on the Plant Protection and Quarantine Web site, *http://www.aphis.usda.gov/plant_health/plant_pest_info/fruit_flies/index.shtml .* The description of the quarantined area will include the date the description was last updated and a description of the changes that have been made to the quarantined area. The description of the quarantined area may also be obtained by request from any local office of PPQ; local offices are listed in telephone directories. After a change is made to the quarantined area, we will publish a notice in the Federal Register informing the public that the change has occurred and describing the change to the quarantined area.
( b ) *Designation of an area less than an entire State as a quarantined area.* Less than an entire State will be designated as a quarantined area only if the Administrator determines that: ( 1 ) The State has adopted and is enforcing restrictions on the intrastate movement of the regulated articles that are equivalent to those imposed by this subpart on the interstate movement of regulated articles; and
( 2 ) The designation of less than the entire State as a quarantined area will prevent the interstate spread of the fruit fly.
( c ) *Criteria for designation of a State, or a portion of a State, as a quarantined area.* A State, or a portion of a State, will be designated as a quarantined area when a fruit fly population has been found in that area by an inspector, when the Administrator has reason to believe that the fruit fly is present in that area, or when the Administrator considers it necessary to quarantine that area because of its inseparability for quarantine enforcement purposes from localities in which the fruit fly has been found.
( d ) *Removal of a State, or a portion of a State, from quarantine.* A State, or a portion of a State, will be removed from quarantine when the Administrator determines that sufficient time has passed without finding additional flies or other evidence of infestation in the area to conclude that the fruit fly no longer exists in that area.
#### § 210.6 Use of Federal funds.

*General.* State agencies shall use Federal funds made available under the Program to reimburse or make advance payments to school food authorities in connection with lunches and meal supplements served in accordance with the provisions of this part; *except that,* with the approval of FNS, any State agency may reserve an amount up to one percent of the funds earned in any fiscal year under this part for use in carrying out special developmental projects. Advance payments to school food authorities may be made at such times and in such amounts as are necessary to meet the current fiscal obligations. All Federal funds paid to any State in place of donated foods shall be used as provided in part 240 of this chapter.

[53 FR 29147, Aug. 2, 1988, as amended at 58 FR 42487, Aug. 10, 1993]
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2141 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2141

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow Head Start teachers 
    the same above-the-line deduction for supplies as is allowed to 
               elementary and secondary school teachers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2013

   Mrs. Beatty (for herself, Mr. Vargas, Ms. Norton, and Mr. Polis) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow Head Start teachers 
    the same above-the-line deduction for supplies as is allowed to 
               elementary and secondary school teachers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HEAD START TEACHERS ALLOWED ABOVE-THE-LINE DEDUCTION FOR 
              SUPPLIES.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 62(d) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (defining eligible educator) is amended by adding 
at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(C) Head start teachers.--The term `eligible 
                educator' includes, with respect to any taxable year, 
                an individual who is a teacher or aide under a Head 
                Start program operating under the Head Start Act (42 
                U.S.C. 9831 et seq.) for at least 700 hours during a 
                school year.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years ending after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
» j r< j f; K . 

### PORiAiiO N 

# •HI S February24 , 201 0 _^ Th e Honorabl e Ra

yLaHoo d Secretary Unite d State s Departmen to fTransportatio n 120 0 Ne wJerseyAvenue , S E Washington , D.C . 2059 0 Subject : Haned a Combinatio n Service s Allocatio n Proceedin g DOT-OST-2010-001 8 Dea rSecretaryLaHood : A s a dedicate d trave l partne ro fAmerica n Airlines , I a m writin g i n suppor to fAmerican' s applicatio n t o provid e ne wservic e fro m Ne wYork' s Joh n F . Kenned yInternationa l Airpor tan d Lo s Angele s Internationa l Airpor tt o Toky o Internationa l Airpor ta tHaneda . I recogniz e an d applau d yo u an d th e Obam a administratio n fo ryou rsucces s las tDecembe ri n reachin g a landmar k

Ope n Skie s agreemen twit h Japan , whic h open s u p Haned a t o servic e b yU.S . airlines . I encourag e you rselectio n o fAmerica n Airline s t o provid e nonsto p servic e fro m Ne wYor k an d Lo s Angele s t o Haned a i n orde rt o provid e a n essentia l connectio n betwee n thre e o fth e world' s financia l an d commerc e centers . Recen tevents , includin g th e successfu l preservatio n o fJapa n Airlines ' oneworl d Allianc e membership , hav e underscore d American' s stron g commitmen t t o th e trans-Pacifi cmarket . America n i s likewis e committe d t o Ne wYor k

an d Los Angle s - bot h vita l foca l point s o fbusiness , trade , entertainment , technolog yan d educatio n

- providin g unsurpasse d ai rservic e sinc e th e mid-1900 s Bot h th e Ne wYor k

an d Lo s Angele s metr o area s wil l gai n significan teconomi cbenefit s fro m thes e propose d ne wflights , a

s wil l American' s customer s an d employees . However , w e nee d you rhel p t o mak e th e JFK/Haned a connectio n a reality . Therefore , I strongl yurg e yo u t o sa yye s t o America n Airline s an d it s reques tfo rslot s t o fl yfro m Kenned yt o Haneda ! Sincerely , /S"KAA7 K 

### 'C^/^^^r^ C <^« ^

0^^^ ^

/HlA, ^

) H.I.S . Internationa l Tour

s (NY) , Inc .
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:97cr85 LAC

DWIGHT M. SPENCER

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on MARCH 11, 2008 

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION FOR REDUCTION OF SENTENCE PURSUANT TO TITLE 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) 

Filed by DEFENDANT PRO SE on March 10, 2008 Doc.# 132

RESPONSES:

on Doc.#

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Mary Maloy

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 28

th day of

May, 2008, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) The Court sentenced the defendant to life imprisonment as required by

statute. Although the defendant’s guideline range is reduced by this guideline

amendment, his sentence still remains the same, life imprisonment, under 21

U.S.C.§841(b)(1)(A)(iii). 

 s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 3:97-cr-00085-LC-MD Document 134 Filed 05/28/08 Page 1 of 1
Date: October 22 , 2014

From: David Cole, EPA , Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards

To: Docket # EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2009

- 0734

Subject: Meeting with Hearth and Home Technologies

- Proposed Standards of

Performance for New Residential Wood Heater s, New Residential Hydronic Heaters and Forced Air Furnaces, and New Residential Masonry Heaters

On October 22 , 2014, Hearth and Home Technologies (HHT) , at their request, met with representatives of EPA. The purpose of the meeting was for HHT to discuss opportunities for improving the process of delivering test reports to EPA’s Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance (OECA) with the outcome of minimizing delays in certification of wood heaters

. Attending the meeting were

—

Hearth and Home Technolo gies : V.P. Berger, Vice

- President , Operations

EPA/OECA : Ed Messina, Julius Banks, Rafael Sanchez , Rick Duffy

EPA/OAQPS (b y telephone ) : Gil Wood, Mike Toney, Amanda Aldridge, David Cole
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:95cr03089-29/RV

CHRISTOPHER GULLEY

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Senior Judge Roger Vinson on November 20, 2008

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION to Reduce Sentence (re Retroactive Application of Sentencing

Guidelines to Crack Cocaine Offense 18 USC 3582) 

Filed by Defendant on 10/14/2007 Doc.# 1227

RESPONSES:

 None on Doc.# 

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

 Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

 s/Jerry Marbut

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Jerry Marbut

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 24th day of

 November , 2008, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) The defendant’s sentencing guideline range is not affected by 

Amendment 706.

 /s/ Roger Vinson

ROGER VINSON

Senior United States District Judge

Case 3:95-cr-03089-RV Document 1231 Filed 11/24/08 Page 1 of 1
§ 3.76 Result if employee fails to meet deadlines. An employee will not be granted a hearing and will have his or her disposable pay offset as specified in USDA's offset schedule if the employee: ( a ) Fails to file a petition for a hearing as prescribed in § 3.75; or
( b ) Is scheduled to appear and fails to appear at the hearing.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Southern National Bancorp of Virginia, Inc. (SNBV) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial officer of SNBV hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that based on their knowledge and belief: 1) the Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and 2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of SNBV as of and for the periods covered in the Report.

|                                           
|-------------------------------------------
|                                           
|/s/ Georgia S. Derrico                     
|Georgia S. Derrico, Chief Executive Officer
|                                           
|/s/ William H. Lagos                       
|William H. Lagos, Chief Financial Officer  

November 8, 2010
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2353 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 23, 2013 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

AN ACT 

To amend title 23, United States Code, with respect to 

the operation of vehicles on certain Wisconsin highways, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2353 RFS

1 SECTION 1. OPERATION OF VEHICLES ON CERTAIN WIS2 CONSIN HIGHWAYS. 

3 Section 127 of title 23, United States Code, is 

4 amended by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(j) OPERATION OF VEHICLES ON CERTAIN WIS6 CONSIN HIGHWAYS.—If any segment of the United States 

7 Route 41 corridor, as described in section 1105(c)(57) of 

8 the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 

9 1991, is designated as a route on the Interstate System, 

10 a vehicle that could operate legally on that segment before 

11 the date of such designation may continue to operate on 

12 that segment, without regard to any requirement under 

13 subsection (a).’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 22, 2013. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2403 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2403

To amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to permit a State 
 to require an applicant for voter registration in the State who uses 
 the Federal mail voter registration application form developed by the 
  Election Assistance Commission under such Act to provide additional 
   information as a condition of the State's acceptance of the form.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 17, 2013

    Mr. Gingrey of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was 
           referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to permit a State 
 to require an applicant for voter registration in the State who uses 
 the Federal mail voter registration application form developed by the 
  Election Assistance Commission under such Act to provide additional 
   information as a condition of the State's acceptance of the form.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Securing America's Fair Elections 
Act'' or the ``SAFE Act''.

SEC. 2. PERMITTING STATES TO REQUIRE VOTER REGISTRATION APPLICANTS 
              USING FEDERAL MAIL FORM TO SUBMIT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 
              AS CONDITION OF ACCEPTANCE OF APPLICATION.

    (a) In General.--Section 6(a)(1) of the National Voter Registration 
Act of 1993 (42 U.S.C. 1973gg-4(a)(1)) is amended by striking the 
period at the end and inserting the following: ``, except that a State 
may require an applicant who submits such form to provide additional 
information relating to the applicant's eligibility to register to vote 
in elections for Federal office in the State (including information 
relating to the applicant's citizenship status) as a condition of the 
State's acceptance of the form.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to elections for Federal office held after the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### The State of Ohio, Appellant, *v.*Snell, Appellee.

[Cite as *State v. Snell*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 567.]

(No. 97-2492

Submitted October 13, 1998

Decided November 18, 1998.)

*Paul F. Kutscher, Jr.,*Seneca County Prosecuting Attorney, and *Kenneth H. Egbert, Jr.,*Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of *State v. Cook*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570.

The cause is remanded to the trial court to conduct a sexual predator classification hearing pursuant to R.C. 2950.09(C)(2).

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 223 (Friday, November 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 70936]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29182]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection

Accreditation and Approval of Intertek USA, Inc., as a Commercial 
Gauger and Laboratory

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of accreditation and approval of Intertek USA, Inc., as 
a commercial gauger and laboratory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 
CFR 151.13, Intertek USA, Inc., 1881 W. State Road 84, Bay 105, Fort 
Lauderdale, FL 33315, has been approved to gauge and accredited to test 
petroleum and petroleum products for customs purposes, in accordance 
with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing 
to employ this entity to conduct laboratory analyses and gauger 
services should request and receive written assurances from the entity 
that it is accredited or approved by the U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection to conduct the specific test or gauger service requested. 
Alternatively, inquiries regarding the specific test or gauger service 
this entity is accredited or approved to perform may be directed to the 
U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The 
inquiry may also be sent to [email protected]. Please reference the Web 
site listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and 
accredited laboratories. 
http:[sol][sol]cbp.gov[sol]xp[sol]cgov[sol]import[sol]operations--
support[sol]labs--scientific--svcs[sol]commercial--gaugers[sol]

DATES: The accreditation and approval of Intertek USA, Inc., as 
commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on August 26, 2010. 
The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for August 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony Malana, Laboratories and 
Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-
1060.

    Dated: November 8, 2010.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
[FR Doc. 2010-29182 Filed 11-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
```
#### § 29.6129 Farm Filler (Y Group).

This group consists of tobacco from the lower portion of the stalk and may include throw out leaves from the Binder and Stripper groups.

| U.S. grades | Grade names, minimum specifications, and tolerances |
| --- | --- |
| Y1 | Fine Quality Farm Filler. Thin, ripe, open, semielastic, normal strength and width, and 12 inches or over in length. Uniformity, 85 percent; injury tolerance, 15 percent. |
| Y2 | Fair Quality Farm Filler. Thin, ripe, firm, inelastic, normal strength, and narrow. Uniformity, 75 percent. Tolerances: 5 percent crude, 5 percent frozen, and 25 percent injury. |
| Y3 | Low Quality Farm Filler. Thin, mature, close, inelastic, weak, and narrow. Uniformity, 60 percent. Tolerances: 10 percent crude, 10 percent frozen, and 40 percent injury. |
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 10.17

                         THE YANKEE CANDLE COMPANY, INC.
                         2005 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION PLAN
                          (NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS ONLY)

Equity

Initial

Upon initial election to the Board, a Director is awarded an option to purchase
20,000 shares of Yankee common stock.

      Option price per share - New York Stock Exchange closing price on date
      preceding date of grant

      Vesting - 25% per year on anniversary date of grant

Annual

On the date immediately following the expiration of the Company's year-end
"black-out" period (i.e., the third business day following the Company's fourth
quarter / year-end earnings release), a Director is awarded an option to
purchase 1,250 shares of Yankee common stock for each regularly scheduled Board
meeting that such Director attended during the previous calendar year, up to a
maximum of 5,000 shares.

Cash

Base:       $15,000 payable in four equal installments of $3,750 on 3/31, 6/30,
            9/30 and 12/31

Additional: $3,000 for Board meeting attended in person or
            $1,500 for each Board meeting attended by phone

Committee members are paid $1,250 for each day in which the committee member
participates in committee meetings, if attending in person, or $625 if attending
by phone.

The Audit Committee chair is paid an additional $4,000/year in four equal
installments of $1,000 on 3/31, 6/30, 9/30 and 12/31.

The Compensation Committee chair and the Nominating & Governance Committee chair
are paid an additional $2,000/year in four equal installments of $500 on 3/31,
6/30, 9/30 and 12/31.