alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T FRA N CI SCO A N TO N I O V A RG A SRAM I RE Z, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 71197 A ge nc yN o. A 094- 456- 502 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r13, 2010 ** B efo re: S IL V E R M A N , C A L L A H A N , an dN . R . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. F ranci sc o A nt on i o V ar gas- R am i re z, a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f E l S al vado r, pet i t i on s f

or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order d is m is s in g h is ap p e a l f

r o m an im m ig r a tio n ju d g e ’s ( “I J ” ) d e c is io n d e n y in g h is appl i c a t i on f

ora s y l um , w i thhol di ng of r e m ova l , and pr ot e c t i on unde rthe 

# FI LED SEP 24 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 71197 2 Co n v e n t i o n A g a i n s tTo rtu r e ( “ CA T” ) . O u rj u r i s d i c t i o n i s g o v e rn e db y8 U . S. C. § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w f

o rs ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e f a c tu a l f in d in g s . See San tos-L em us v. Mukasey , 54 2 F . 3d 73 8, 74 2 (9th C i r. 20 08 ). W e di sm i ss i n p artand d eny i n p art th e p e t i t i o n f

o rr e v i e w. B ec au se V ar g as -R am irez fa il ed to ex h au st an y c h allen g e to th e I J’s de t e rm i na t i on tha the i s i ne l i gi bl e f ora s y l um due t o an a ggr ava t e d f e l ony c o n v ic tio n , s e e B a rr o n v . A s h c r o ft , 3 5 8 F . 3 d6 7 4 , 6 7 8 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 4 ), w e d i sm i ss th e p e t i t i o n a s t o V ar g a s - Rami r e z ’ s a s y l u m c l a i m. S ub st ant i alevi dence s up po rt s the agency’ s f i nd i ng thatV ar gas- R am i re z f a i l e d t o de m ons tr a t e pa s tpe r s e c ut i on ba s e d upon vi s i t s t o the f am i l yhom e by u n kn o w n p e r s o n s . Se e Li m v . I NS , 224 F . 3d 929, 936 ( 9th C i r . 2000) . I n the op eni ng bri ef

, V ar gas- R am i re z f

ai l s t o argue thathe can o therw i se dem on strat e a c le arp r o b ab ilityo f

f u tu r e p e r s e c u tio n . Se e M a r t i n ez - Se rra n o v . I

NS , 94 F . 3d 1256, 1259- 60 ( 9th C i r . 1996) ( i s s ue s notr a i s e d and ar gue d i n aparty ’ s ope ni ng b r ie f ar e w a iv e d ) . A c c o r d in g ly , V ar g a s - R am ir e z ’s w ith h o ld in g o f r e m o v a l c la im fai l s. V ar ga s - R a m i r e z f a i l s t o r a i s e anys ubs t ant i ve ar gum e nt s w i th r e s pe c tt o the a g e n c y ’s d e n ia l o f

C A T r e lie f

. Se e i d. P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D IS M IS S E D i n p art; D E N IE D i n p art .
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 1366** 

ANASTASIYA KRUSHEVSKAYA , Petitioner ,

v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General , Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted : September 3, 2015 Decided: November 4, 2015

Before SHEDD and DIAZ , Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Alexander J. Segal, THE LAW OFFICES OF GRINBERG & SEGAL, P.L.L.C., New York, New York , for Petitioner. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Senior Litigation Counsel, Melissa K. Lott , Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE , Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Anastasi y a Krushevskaya , a native and citizen of Belarus , petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board ) dismi ssing her appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of her requests for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript of Krushevskaya’s merits hearing and all supporting evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision. See INS v. Elias

– Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992). We have also considered the various bases for Krushevskaya ’s claim that the immigration judge’s conduct at the merits hearing violated her due process rights and find no error in the Board’s conclusion that Kru shevskaya failed to show that the immigration judge was biased or that she did not receive a full or fair hearing. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(b)(1) (2012) (giving immigration judges authority to “interrogate, examine, and

cross - examine the alien and any witness es”); Rusu v. INS , 296 F.3d 316, 321

- 22 (4th Cir. 2002) (providing that alien must be “accorded an opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in3 a meaningful manner, i.e., . . . [to] receive a full and fair hearing on [her] claims ”). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. In re: Krushevskaya (B.I.A. Mar. 18, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

PETITION DENIE D
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Mario Mesa, Appellant, v Robert J. Henderson, as Superintendent of the Auburn Correctional Facility, Respondent.

unanimously affirmed (see *People ex rel. Barnes v Smith,*70 AD2d 764). (Appeal from judgment of *1016Cayuga Supreme Court—habeas corpus.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Cardamone, Hancock, Jr., Callahan and Witmer, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2026 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2026

  To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to exempt certain 
silvicultural activities from national pollutant discharge elimination 
        system permitting requirements, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 16, 2013

  Ms. Herrera Beutler (for herself, Mr. Schrader, Mr. Benishek, Mrs. 
      McMorris Rodgers, Mr. Ribble, Mr. Simpson, Mr. Thompson of 
    Pennsylvania, Mr. Walden, Mr. Bishop of Georgia, Mr. Larsen of 
 Washington, Mr. Rahall, Ms. Sewell of Alabama, Mr. Cotton, Mr. Duncan 
of South Carolina, Mr. Kingston, Mr. Jones, Mr. Michaud, Mr. Barrow of 
 Georgia, Mr. Peterson, and Mr. Hastings of Washington) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
                           and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to exempt certain 
silvicultural activities from national pollutant discharge elimination 
        system permitting requirements, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Silviculture Regulatory Consistency 
Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. SILVICULTURAL ACTIVITIES.

    Section 402(l) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 
U.S.C. 1342(l)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Silvicultural activities.--
                    ``(A) NPDES permit requirements for silvicultural 
                activities.--The Administrator shall not require a 
                permit or otherwise promulgate regulations under this 
                section or directly or indirectly require any State to 
                require a permit under this section for a discharge of 
                stormwater runoff resulting from the conduct of the 
                following silviculture activities: nursery operations, 
                site preparation, reforestation and subsequent cultural 
                treatment, thinning, prescribed burning, pest and fire 
                control, harvesting operations, surface drainage, and 
                road use, construction, and maintenance.
                    ``(B) Permits for dredged or fill material.--
                Nothing in this paragraph exempts a silvicultural 
                activity resulting in the discharge of dredged or fill 
                material from any permitting requirement under section 
                404.''.
                                 <all>
```
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:98cr13 LAC

ERNESTO MENDEZ

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on APRIL 29, 2008 

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION AND MEMO TO TERMINATE SUPERVISED RELEASE 

Filed by DEFENDANT on3/20/08 Doc.# __200 ___________

RESPONSES:

on Doc.#

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Mary Maloy

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 19th day of

May, 2008, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) 

 s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 3:98-cr-00013-LC Document 201 Filed 05/19/08 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 31.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT


I, Kevin J. McAndrew, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Canterbury Consulting
Group, Inc.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.    I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:

a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
 controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b)    [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]

c)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d)    disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.    I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a)    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls
over financial reporting.

Date: February 27, 2004
                     /s/ Kevin J. McAndrew
                     ----------------------------------------
                       Kevin J. McAndrew
                       President and Chief Executive Officer
                       and Chief Financial Officer
exv10wdd



 






EXHIBIT 10dd




ROWAN COMPANIES, INC.

2004 PROFIT SHARING PLAN




	 	 	 
	Eligibility

	 	All previous corporate or drilling division option recipients, plus all other qualifying division office

employees (approximately 330 total employees)
	 
	 	 
	Measurement

	 	Drilling EBITDA, defined as GAAP-based EBITDA from Drilling segment operations
	Criteria
	 	 
	 
	 	 
	

	 	GAAP is Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
	

	 	EBITDA is Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization.
	 
	 	 
	Award

	 	Pool dollars allocated to participants in proportion to Base Pay, as defined below

(all participants receive same % of Base Pay)
	 
	 	 
	Cap

	 	2004 Pool capped at $5 million, subject to Committee/Board discretion
	 
	 	 
	Base Pay

	 	W-2 earnings, less any bonus and value attributable to stock options





[Information omitted regarding target levels with respect to specific
quantitative or qualitative performance related-factors, or factors or criteria
involving confidential commercial or business information, the disclosure of
which would have an adverse effect on the registrant.]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

MATHEW SELOVER,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:20cv4698-TKW-HTC

ESCAMBIA COUNTY BOARD OF

COMMISSIONERS and RAYME

EDLER,

Defendants.

________________________________/

ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND

Upon due consideration of Plaintiff’s unopposed motion for leave to amend 

complaint (Doc. 19), it is ORDERED that:

1. The motion is GRANTED, and the amended complaint (Doc. 20) is now 

the operative complaint.

2. The motions to dismiss the original complaint (Docs. 8, 16) are DENIED 

as moot.

3. Defendants shall have 14 days from the date of this Order to answer or 

otherwise respond to the amended complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(3).

Case 3:20-cv-04698-TKW-HTC Document 21 Filed 04/24/20 Page 1 of 2
2

4. Defendant Edler’s motion to stay discovery (Doc. 9) remains under 

advisement, and the Order tolling the deadline for her to respond to 

Plaintiff’s discovery requests (Doc. 14) remains in effect.

DONE and ORDERED this 24th day of April, 2020.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-04698-TKW-HTC Document 21 Filed 04/24/20 Page 2 of 2
#### § 319.69-2 Freedom from pests.

All packing materials allowed entry under restriction shall be free from injurious insects and plant diseases.
EXHIBIT 21.0

                              List of Subsidiaries


Matthews & Wright, Inc.                      (Delaware)
Snider, Williams & Co., Inc.                 (Delaware)
Randolph, Hudson & Co., Inc.                 (Delaware)
Shaw Realty Company, Inc.                    (New York)
Burrows, Hayes Company, Inc.                 (New York)
Dover, Sussex Company, Inc.                  (New York)
Housing Capital Corporation                  (New York)
Randel, Palmer & Co., Inc.                   (New York)
Parker, Reld & Co., Inc.                     (New York)
McAdam, Taylor & Co., Inc.                   (New York)
Helmstar Funding, Inc.                       (Pennsylvania)
Ryan, Jones & Co., Inc.                      (New York)
Movieplex Realty Leasing, L.L.C.             (New Jersey)
CareerEngine, Inc.                           (New York)
Advanced Digital Networks, Inc.              (New York)
Alexander Edwards International, Inc.        (New York)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS    
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           2,986,123
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,258,936
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                        229,298
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   133,625
<PP&E>                                          15,585,199
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,237,684
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,689,421
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,304,909
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           118,143
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,689,421
<SALES>                                         12,357,165
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,357,165
<CGS>                                            3,735,669
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,941,284
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    36,125
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  84,517
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,452,006
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,067,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,384,506
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,384,506
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .28
        


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION

I, **Gary A. Reys**, certify that:

(1)        I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 of CellCyte Genetics Corporation (the "Report");

(2)        Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;

(3)        Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this Report;

(4)        The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)        Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)        Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c)        Disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

(5)        The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the  small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)        All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)        Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:    May 18, 2007.

/s/ "*Gary A. Reys*"
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Bernard Chaus,
Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

o   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

o   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



September 27, 2002
                                            /s/ Josephine Chaus
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Josephine Chaus
                                            Chairwoman of the Board and
                                            Chief Executive Officer
#### § 29.2507 Color.

The third factor of a grade based on the relative hues, saturation or chroma, and color values common to the type.
#### § 29.2554 Stemmed.

A form of tobacco, including strips and strip scrap, from which the stems or midribs have been removed.

[37 FR 13626, July 12, 1972. Redesignated at 49 FR 16757, Apr. 20, 1984 and 51 FR 40406, Nov. 7, 1986]
Page 1 of 1

Case No. 5:20cv79-RH-MJF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

KAREN STRIPLING,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 5:20cv79-RH-MJF

FREDDIE MCKINNEY et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

This case is before the court on the magistrate judge’s report and 

recommendation, ECF No. 16. No objections have been filed. Upon consideration,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as the court’s 

opinion. The clerk must enter judgment stating, “This case is dismissed without 

prejudice.” The clerk must close the file.

SO ORDERED on October 23, 2020.

s/Robert L. Hinkle

United States District Judge

Case 5:20-cv-00079-RH-MJF Document 17 Filed 10/23/20 Page 1 of 1