alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT31.2****CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, Paul J. Cornell, certify that:1) I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Quintana Maritime Limited. 2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions); a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.         By: /s/ Paul J. Cornell             Paul J. Cornell      Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer  Date:August 9, 2006
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT WILLIS J. FOSTER, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-2124 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed November 30, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Collier County; Fredrick R. Hardt, Judge. Willis J. Foster, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Johnson v. State, 60 So. 3d 1045 (Fla. 2011); Mendenhall v. State, 48 So. 3d 740 (Fla. 2010); Johnson v. State, 149 So. 3d 727 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014); Flowers v. State, 69 So. 3d 1042 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).

KHOUZAM, MORRIS, and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2197 

AN ACT 

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate 

segments of the York River and associated tributaries 

for study for potential inclusion in the National Wild 

and Scenic Rivers System. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2197 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘York River Wild and 

3 Scenic River Study Act of 2014’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION FOR STUDY. 

5 Section 5(a) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 

6 U.S.C. 1276(a)) is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing: 

8 ‘‘(l) YORK RIVER, MAINE.—(A) The York 

9 River that flows 11.25 miles from its headwaters at 

10 York Pond to the mouth of the river at York Har11 bor, and all associated tributaries. 

12 ‘‘(B) The study conducted under this paragraph 

13 shall— 

14 ‘‘(i) determine the effect of the designation 

15 on— 

16 ‘‘(I) existing commercial and rec17 reational activities, such as hunting, fish18 ing, trapping, recreational shooting, motor 

19 boat use, bridge construction; 

20 ‘‘(II) the authorization, construction, 

21 operation, maintenance, or improvement of 

22 energy production and transmission infra23 structure; and 

24 ‘‘(III) the authority of State and local 

25 governments to manage those activities; 

26 and 
3 

•HR 2197 EH

1 ‘‘(ii) identify— 

2 ‘‘(I) all authorities that will authorize 

3 or require the Secretary to influence local 

4 land use decisions (such as zoning) or 

5 place restrictions on non-Federal land if 

6 designated under this Act; 

7 ‘‘(II) all authorities that the Secretary 

8 may use to condemn property; and 

9 ‘‘(III) all private property located in 

10 the area studied under this paragraph.’’. 

11 SEC. 3. STUDY AND REPORT. 

12 Section 5(b) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 

13 U.S.C. 1276(b)) is amended by adding at the end the fol14 lowing: 

15 ‘‘(l) YORK RIVER, MAINE.—The study of the 

16 York River, Maine, named in paragraph (l) of sub17 section (a) shall be completed by the Secretary of 

18 the Interior and the report thereon submitted to 

19 Congress not later than 3 years after the date on 
4 

•HR 2197 EH

1 which funds are made available to carry out this 

2 paragraph.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 4, 

2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2197 

AN ACT 

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to desNational Wild and Scenic Rivers System. tributaries for study for potential inclusion in the ignate segments of the York River and associated
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO.: 4:03cr10-SPM

JAMES HENRY MOORE,

Defendant.

____________________________/

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REDUCE UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 3582

This cause comes before the Court on Defendant James Henry Moore’s 

Motion to Reduce Sentence (doc. 74) pursuant to the retroactive crack cocaine

amendment (Amendments 706 and 711) and 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c). The

Government filed a response in opposition (doc. 73).

An application of the amendment results in no change to Defendant’s

guideline range because of the career offender enhancement, which sets

Defendant’s offense level at 37. With a 3 point reduction for acceptance of

responsibility, Defendant’s total offense level remains at level 34, and his

guideline range remains 262-327 months as originally calculated. Accordingly, it

is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion to Reduce Sentence (doc.

74) is denied.

DONE AND ORDERED this 26th day of March, 2008.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 4:03-cr-00010-RH-CAS Document 76 Filed 03/26/08 Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Wilber Fields, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered August 11, 1965, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree and assault in the second degree (2 counts), upon a.jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law and in the interests of justice, and new trial ordered. The findings of fact below are affirmed. Though the evidence arrayed against defendant was conflicting and presented a very close question concerning his guilt, we would affirm the judgment were it not that we are constrained to reverse it because of prosecutorial misconduct. At the beginning of the People’s summation, the prosecutor stated that he had courteously remained silent during defendant’s summation and hoped that defendant’s counsel would maintain a similar silence during the People’s summation. Such an obviously improper attempt to silence defendant during the People’s summation is calculated to make defendant’s attorney appear disruptive, and thus to turn the jury, or even one juror, against defendant, when defendant’s counsel thereafter objects to the People’s summation. The case at bar is an example of the invidious nature of such an utterance, for the prosecutor, having urged defendant’s counsel to remain silent, thereafter made inflammatory statements to which defendant’s objections were sustained. Among these statements were two which require a new 'trial in the interests of justice. The prosecutor, though repeatedly warned by the trial court, told the jurors in effect that their deliberaions should be controlled by the moral law that *“*Thou shalt not kill.” Such an appeal, pursued against the court’s direct orders to refrain, might well have persuaded one or more jurors that, if the question of guilt were close, there was nevertheless an imperative, supervening law that demanded satisfaction. In addition, the prosecutor stated to the jury, in .substance, that the victim would have testified against defendant but for the victim’s death, and thus imported by suggestion evidence not present in the record. Though the court instructed the jury to disregard the prosecutor’s objectionable statements, we cannot say with any certitude that the damage was repaired, particularly in view of the close question of defendant’s guilt *(People*v. *Carborano,*301 N. Y. 39; *People*v. *Conigliaro,*20 A D 2d 930). Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO




18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,




AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906




OF
      THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Chardan North China Acquisition
      Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30,
      2007 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
      date hereof, I Li Zhang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Dated:
                  August 14, 2007
                CHARDAN
                    NORTH CHINA ACQUISITION CORPORATIONBy:
                /s/ Li
                  ZhangLi
                    Zhang
                  Chief
                    Executive Officer
                  (Principal
                    Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of
MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i) the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



|                         |  |  |  |                                                                                    
|------------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: September 3, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Margaret Sakai                                                                 
|                         |  |  |  | Margaret Sakai Chief
Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended or incorporated by reference in any registration statement of the Company filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Jaime Quevedo et al., Appellants, v Leslie Eichner, Defendant. Act II Glass & Mirror Corp., Nonparty Respondent.

[813 NYS2d 310]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Martin, J.), dated June 14, 2005, which denied their motion to compel the deposition of a nonparty witness and to produce any related materials.

*555Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law and as an exercise of discretion, with costs, and the motion is granted.

Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, the nonparty respondent, Act II Glass & Mirror Corp., had standing to challenge the subpoena directed to its employee, which sought information obtained by the employee through his employment *(see Dellwood Foods v Abrams,*109 Misc 2d 263, 266-267 [1981], *affd*84 AD2d 692 [1981]). However, the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiffs’ motion to compel the employee, inter alia, to comply with the subpoena and to appear for a deposition. The plaintiffs demonstrated that the disclosure sought was material and necessary *(see*CPLR 3101 [a] [4]), and that the information was otherwise unobtainable *(see Koramblyum v Medvedovsky,*19 AD3d 651 [2005]; *Thorson v New York City Tr. Auth.,*305 AD2d 666 [2003]; *Maxwell v Snapper, Inc.,*249 AD 2d 374 [1998]). Adams, J.P., Goldstein, Fisher and Lifson, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**Certification**

I, Jack Pearlstein, Chief Financial Officer of Solera Holdings, Inc., certifythat: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Solera Holdings, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to bedesigned under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accountingprinciples;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: November 6, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 224 (Monday, November 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 71134]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29363]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


National Institutes of Health

National Cancer Institute; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Cancer Institute Initial Review 
Group; Subcommittee A--Cancer Centers.
    Date: December 9-10, 2010.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 12 p.m.
    Agenda: To reveiw and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Residence Inn Bethesda, 735 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, 
MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Gail J. Bryant, MD, Medical Officer, Resources 
and Training Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, 
National Cancer Institute, 6116 Executive Blvd., Room 8107, MSC 
8328, Bethesda, MD 20892-8328, (301) 402-0801, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#583f3a6b682c18363130763f372e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6b0c09585b1f2b050203450c041d">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 16, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-29363 Filed 11-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 24.1

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

   KNOW ALL PEOPLE BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears
below constitutes and appoints Laurence R. Hootnick his or her attorneys in fact
with the power of substitution for him or her in any and all capacities, to sign
any amendments to this Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with exhibits
thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said
attorneys in fact, or his or her substitute or substitutes, may do or cause to
be done by virtue thereof.

   Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, this
Report has been signed below by the following persons in the capacities and on
the dates indicated.
<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
            Signature              Title                        Date
            ---------              -----                        ----
<S>                                <C>                          <C> 
By:  /s/ Jonathan J. Golovin       Chairman of the Board,       January 27, 1997
    ----------------------------   and Chief Technical Officer
        (Jonathan J. Golovin) 


By:  /s/ Laurence R. Hootnick      President, Chief Executive   January 27, 1997
   ------------------------------  Officer and Director
        (Laurence R. Hootnick)     (Principal Executive 
                                   Officer)


By:  /s/ Clifton Wong              Vice President of Finance,   January 27, 1997
   ------------------------------  and Chief Financial Officer
        (Clifton Wong)             (Principal Financial 
                                   Officer)


By:  /s/ Robert C. Fink            Director                     January 27, 1997
   -----------------------------                                
        (Robert C. Fink)


By:  /s/ Robert Horne              Director                     January 27, 1997
    ----------------------------                              
        (Robert Horne)


By:  /s/ Thomas A. Tomasetti       Director                     January 27, 1997
    ----------------------------                                  
        (Thomas A. Tomasetti)
</TABLE>
#### § 201.44 Forwarding samples.

Before being forwarded for analysis, test, or examination, the containers of samples shall be properly sealed and identified in such manner as may be prescribed by AMS. Samples of coated seed shall be forwarded in firmly packed crush-proof and moisture-proof containers.

[59 FR 64492, Dec. 14, 1994]
120 STAT. 318 PUBLIC LAW 109–209—MAR. 24, 2006

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4826:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):

Mar. 14, considered and passed House.

Mar. 16, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–209

109th Congress

An Act

To extend through December 31, 2006, the authority of the Secretary of the Army

to accept and expend funds contributed by non-Federal public entities to expedite

the processing of permits.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FUNDING TO PROCESS PERMITS.

Section 214(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 2000

(33 U.S.C. 2201 note; 114 Stat. 2594; 117 Stat. 1836; 119 Stat.

2169) is amended by striking ‘‘March 31, 2006’’ and inserting

‘‘December 31, 2006’’.

Approved March 24, 2006.

Mar. 24, 2006

[H.R. 4826]