alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w15w1



 





Exhibit 10.15.1



AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




     THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is made the 15th
day of November, 2003, by and between ENCORE MEDICAL CORPORATION, a Delaware
corporation, with its principal office located at 9800 Metric Boulevard,
Austin, Texas 78758 (the “Company”) and SCOTT KLOSTERMAN, an individual
residing at 800 Market Street, Suite 312, Chattanooga, TN 37402 (the
“Employee”).



     WHEREAS, the Employee and the Company entered into an Employment Agreement
dated June 2, 2003 (the “Agreement”);



     WHEREAS, the Employee and the Company desire that there be certain changes
made with respect to the Agreement; and



     WHEREAS, the Employee and the Company want to memorialize in this
Amendment their agreements regarding such changes to the Agreement.



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and other mutual promises
and covenants contained in this Amendment and for other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the
parties, intending legally to be bound, agree as follows:




	1.	 	The term of the Agreement is hereby extended to December 31,
2006.
	 
	2.	 	Except as specifically changed by this Amendment, all other
terms and provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect.





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed
by its duly authorized officer and the Employee has hereto set his/her hand as
of the date and year first above written.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	COMPANY:
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	ENCORE MEDICAL CORPORATION
	 
	 	 	 	 
	

	 	By:
	 	/s/ Kenneth W. Davidson
	

	 	 	 	

	

	 	 	 	Kenneth W. Davidson, Chief Executive Officer
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	EMPLOYEE:
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/ Scott Klosterman
	 	 	

	 	 	SCOTT KLOSTERMAN








- 7 -
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           11605
<DEPRECIATION>                                    8545
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    3060
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2627271
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1750
<OTHER-SE>                                    (2614356)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      3060
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (2450128)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                (2450128)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (2450128)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.74)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.74)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 4.1**

**AMENDMENT TO COMMON STOCK PURCHASE WARRANT**TO PURCHASE 84,500 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OF BABYUNIVERSE, INC.

This Amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Common Stock Purchase Warrant (the “Warrant Agreement”) dated August 8, 2005 issued by BabyUniverse, Inc. to GunnAllen Financial, Inc. is made by BabyUniverse, Inc. and GunnAllen Financial, Inc. (the “Parties”).

Pursuant to Section 13 of the Warrant Agreement, the Parties agree that the Exercise Price of the Warrant shall be changed to $11.50 per share.

Pursuant to Section 18(i) of the Warrant Agreement, the Parties agree that the Warrant Agreement shall hereby be modified as follows:

          The final sentence of Section 17(a) shall be deleted.

          Section 17(b) shall be deleted in its entirety.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed or caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of May 11, 2006:

|   | BABYUNIVERSE,   INC         |
|--------|-----------------------------|
|   |                        |   |
|   |                        |   |
|   | By:                         | /s/ John C.   Textor |
|   |                        |  |
|   |                        | John C.   Textor |
|   |                        | CEO |
|   |                        |   |
|   |                        |   |
|   | GUNNALLEN   FINANCIAL, INC. |
|   |                        |   |
|   |                        |   |
|   | By:                         | /s/ Glenn N.   Huber |
|   |                        |  |
|   | Name:                       | Glenn N.   Huber |
|   | Title:                      | Senior   Managing Director, Investment Banking |
EXHIBIT
32





CASCADE
TECHNOLOGIES CORP.





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cascade Technologies Corp.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending November 30, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Jacqueline Danforth, as Principal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      January 8, 2010
            By:
            /s/Jacqueline
      DanforthName:
      Jacqueline DanforthTitle:
      Principal Financial Officer


A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the
United States Code has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant
to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United
States Code and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the
Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such
filing.)
Order.

#### Case *et al. vs.*Myers.

[Mr. Apperson for plaintiff: no appearance for defendant.]

From Montgomery County Court.

*May*1.

Notice to owners of land through whicharoadisto pass, is indispensable to give validity to the order of court for opening it.

*Road cases*may still be taken (by appeal or *w. e.)*upon matters of *law only,*direct ly to the Court of Appeals,, from the county court to the act of ’30, allowing appeals to the circuit courts, to re try *the facts fy law,*being merely cujnulative.

Chief Justice Robertson

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

As the County Court obviously erred in this case, in ordering the opening of a road through the lands of the plaintiffs in error, without any notice to, or appearance by them, or any of them — the only question we shall consider, is, whether the writ of error, as now brought, *upon a matter of law,*will lie to this Court, without any appeal first to the Circuit Court.

The general jurisdiction of this Court certainly embraced this case prior to the enactment of the statute of 1796, which authorized the assignment of *“errors upon matters of fact, as well as upon matters of law;”*and therefore, the subsequent statute of 1830, repealing so much of the act of 1796 as gave this Court jurisdiction over *both*errors in fact and in law in road cases, and authorizing appeals and writs of error to the Circuit Court to revise both kinds o(f errors, and also restricting appeals and writs of error, from the Circuit Courts to this Court, to the revision of errors in law only — should, in our opinion, be understood as not abolishing the pre-established and general jurisdiction of this Court, over mat*331ters of law alone, upon appeals or writs of error immediately to revise the orders of the County Courts; but as being, *in that respect,*merely cumulative.

Wherefore, the order in this case is set aside, and the case remanded.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:87-cr-01018-MP-2

PERCIVAL ALEXANDER HUSSEY,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 3, Motion to Dismiss Filed by the United States. 

The government moved to dismiss the charges against Mr. Hussey because of the age of the case

and the unlikelihood of a successful prosecution at this late date. Upon consideration, the

motion is granted.

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

Doc. 3, the indictment against Mr. Hussey is dismissed, and the Clerk is directed to close

this case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 12th day of October, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:87-cr-01018-MP Document 4 Filed 10/12/11 Page 1 of 1
#### § 29.2558 Sweated.

The condition of tobacco, which has passed through one or more fermentations natural to tobacco packed with a normal percentage of moisture. This condition is sometimes described as aged.

[37 FR 13626, July 12, 1972. Redesignated at 49 FR 16757, Apr. 20, 1984 and 51 FR 40406, Nov. 7, 1986]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

-- -- -- --

NO. 15-0812

FRANCIS W.S. CHAN

v.

J. SHELBY SHARPE, HENRY

CHANG, KAREN CHANG & THE

LAW OFFICES OF J. SHELBY

SHARPE, A PROFESSIONAL

CORPORATION

§

§

§

§

§

§

Tarrant County,

2nd District.

January 8, 2016

Petitioner's petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case,

having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.



I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify

that the above and attached is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of

Texas in the case numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of

said Court under the date shown.

It is further ordered that petitioner, FRANCIS W.S. CHAN, pay all costs incurred on this

petition.

WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this

the 18th day of February, 2016.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk

FILE COPY
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ERIC LEE YOUNGS,

Inmate No. 000704396,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 3:20cv5102-MCR-EMT

VOLUSIA COUNTY DEPARTMENT

OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge’s 

Report and Recommendation dated March 25, 2020. ECF No. 4. Plaintiff has been 

furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to 

file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have 

made a de novo determination of all timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed 

objections thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be 

adopted.

Case 3:20-cv-05102-MCR-EMT Document 5 Filed 06/12/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:20cv5102-MCR-EMT

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted 

and incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. The clerk of court is directed to transfer this case to the United States 

District Court for the Middle District of Florida and close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 12th day of June 2020.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-05102-MCR-EMT Document 5 Filed 06/12/20 Page 2 of 2
Case No. 3:20cv3676-MAF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

SHANE BLISS, 

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No. 3:20cv3676-MCR/MAF

ANDREW SAUL, 

Commissioner of Social 

Security,

Defendant.

________________________/

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

This action was initiated under the Social Security Act to obtain judicial 

review of Defendant=s final decision denying Plaintiff=s claim for disability 

benefits. ECF No. 1. Defendant filed a motion to remand pursuant to 

sentence four of 42 U.S.C. ' 405(g). ECF No. 21. Defendant has certified 

that Plaintiff has no objection to this motion. Id. at 1.

Sentence four of section 405(g) states that A[t]he court shall have 

power to enter, upon the pleadings and transcript of the record, a judgment 

affirming, modifying, or reversing the decision of the Commissioner of Social 

Security, with or without remanding the cause for a rehearing.@ 42 U.S.C. '

405(g). The Deputy Commissioner states that remand is appropriate to 

enable an Administrative Law Judge to “further evaluate whether medical 

Case 3:20-cv-03676-MAF Document 22 Filed 12/01/20 Page 1 of 2
Case No. 3:20cv3676-MAF

improvement occurred in accordance with 20 C.F.R. § 404.1594.” ECF No. 

21 at 1. Based upon the foregoing, this court concludes that good cause 

has been shown for remand.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. Defendant=s motion to remand, ECF No. 21, is GRANTED, and the 

Commissioner=s decision denying benefits be REVERSED.

2. This case is REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to 

sentence four of 42 U.S.C. ' 405(g).

3. Defendant shall conduct proceedings in accordance with this 

Memorandum Opinion and Order.

4. The clerk shall enter final judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

5. The clerk shall administratively close this file. 

DONE AND ORDERED on December 1, 2020.

S/ MARTIN A. FITZPATRICK 

MARTIN A. FITZPATRICK

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-03676-MAF Document 22 Filed 12/01/20 Page 2 of 2
#### § 29.2291 Quality.

A division of a group or the second factor of a grade based on the relative degree of one or more elements of quality.
§ 1206.60 Reports. ( a ) Each first handler will be required to provide to the Board periodically such information as may be required by the Board, with the approval of the Department, which may include but not be limited to the following: ( 1 ) Number of pounds of domestic mangos handled;
( 2 ) Number of pounds of domestic mangos on which an assessment was paid;
( 3 ) Name and address of the producers from whom the first handler has received mangos;
( 4 ) Date that assessment payments were made on each pound of domestic mangos handled;
( 5 ) Number of pounds of domestic mangos exported;
( 6 ) The first handler's tax identification number;
( b ) Each importer may be required to provide to the Board periodically such information as may be required by the Board, with the approval of the Department, which may include but not be limited to the following: ( 1 ) Number of pounds of mangos imported;
( 2 ) Number of pounds of mangos on which an assessment was paid;
( 3 ) Name, address, and tax identification number of the importer; and
( 4 ) Date that assessment payments were made on each pound imported.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDING
DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,446,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,550,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,996,000
<PP&E>                                      12,441,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,469,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,968,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,100,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,000,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,868,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,968,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               804,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              216,219,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (215,415,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (215,415,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (215,415,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.09)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of China Natural Resources, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I,Yue Ming Wai Bonaventure, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Yue Ming Wai Bonaventure

Yue Ming Wai Bonaventure

Chief Financial Officer

April 30, 2018

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 29.2666 Scrap (S Group).

A byproduct of unstemmed and stemmed tobacco. Scrap accumulates from handling tobacco in farm buildings, warehouses, packing and conditioning plants, and stemmeries.

| Grades | Grade names and specifications |
| --- | --- |
| S | Scrap. |
| | Tangled, whole, or broken unstemmed leaves, or the web portions of tobacco leaves reduced to scrap by any process. |

[37 FR 13626, July 12, 1972, as amended at 49 FR 16757, Apr. 20, 1984]
CITY OF HOUSTQN _ _______ An_n_is_e_D_. P_a_rk_e_r _ 

Office of the Mayor 

May 6, 2015 

The Honorable Anthony R. Foxx 

Secretary of Transportation 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

The Honorable John F. Kerry 

Secretary of State 

US Department of State 

2201 C Street NW 

Washington, DC 20520 

Dear Secretaries Foxx and Kerry: 

Mayor 

P.O. Box 1562 

Houston, Texas 77251-1562 

Telephone - Dial 311 

www.houstontx.gov 

As the home to one of the country's ten busiest airports, the City of Houston holds significant 

interest in ensuring that U.S. airlines- indeed, all air carriers- are provided a fair and level 

playing field to compete for routes. It creates healthy competition in the marketplace, producing 

more choices and lower fares for passengers. 

However, it has been brought to my attention that a small group of state-owned airlines in the 

Arabian Gulf are alleged to be receiving substantial subsidies from their governments and are 

therefore violating the longtime Open Skies policy designed to foster healthy competition. 

I respectfully request the federal government investigate these allegations, and, if proven to be 

true, take appropriate action by opening a dialogue with the governments of Qatar and the United 

Arab Emirates to address such subsidies. 

Regards, 

Annise D. Parker 

Mayor 

s 10-150511-013 
CITY OF HOUSTON OHiceoftheMoyor 

P.O. Box 1562 

510-150511-013 

Houslon. Texas 7725 1-1562 

The Honorable Anthony R. Foxx 

Secretary of Transportation 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

U.S. POSTAGE» PITNEY BOWES 

ZIP 

~-' 

77002 

~---$000 48° 

02 1n • 0001398585MAY 07 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                  
<ARTICLE>                                     5
<CIK>                                0000794927
<NAME>       CANTERBURY CORPORATE SERVICES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1
       
<S>                                 <C>
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   NOV-30-1996   
<PERIOD-START>                      DEC-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                        NOV-30-1996
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            12-MOS
<CASH>                                  440,178
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                         4,827,463
<ALLOWANCES>                          1,685,439
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      6,430,429
<PP&E>                                6,057,416
<DEPRECIATION>                        3,304,986
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       27,465,019
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 4,459,410
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                           16,258,816
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         27,465,019
<SALES>                              14,082,608
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     14,082,608
<CGS>                                 6,441,662
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         6,586,537
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       (701,060)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      1,062,735
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      682,251
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          10,483
<INCOME-TAX>                              4,255
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       6,228
<DISCONTINUED>                        1,660,340
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                          1,666,568
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0.12
        

</TABLE>