alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:99cr113LAC

MARVIN ROSS

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on AUGUST 14, 2008 

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION FOR REDUCTION OF SENTENCE PURSUANT TO TITLE 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) 

Filed by DEFENDANT PRO SE on 8/13/08 Doc.# 99

RESPONSES:

BY GOVERNMENT on2/13/09 Doc.# 102

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Mary Maloy

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 9 day of

th

September, 2009, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) See Doc 98.

s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Document No.
Exhibit
32.2





Certification of Principal
Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of SRKP 2, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Anthony C. Pintsopoulos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Anthony C.
  PintsopoulosAnthony
      C. Pintsopoulos
                Principal
      Financial Officer
                October
      23, 2009
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 1st JUDICIAL CIRCUIT

IN AND FOR ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA

CASE NO.: 2020-CA-000077

MATHEW SELOVER,

Plaintiff,

v.

ESCAMBIA COUNTY BOARD OF 

COUNTY COMMISSIONERS: and 

RAYME EDLER,

Defendants.

_____________________________________/

JOINT STIPULATION FOR SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL

The undersigned counsel, pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.505(e) 

and (f), stipulate to the entry of an Order substituting THE HEALTH LAW FIRM, as counsel 

of record for the Defendant, RAYME EDLER, in place and stead of LYDECKER DIAZ, LLC

The undersigned respectfully request that this Court enter an Order approving the stipulation and 

relieving LYDECKER DIAZ, LLC, from any further responsibility with respect to the 

representation of Defendant, RAYME EDLER.

THE HEALTH LAW FIRM LYDECKER DIAZ, LLC

/s/ George F. Indest /s/ Stephanie Pidermann

George F. Indest, III Esq. Stephanie Pidermann, Esq.

Florida Bar No.: 382426 Florida Bar No.: 60414

1101 Douglas Avenue, Ste. 1000 495 Grand Blvd, Suite 206

Altamonte Springs, Florida 32714 Miramar Beach, FL 32550

Filing # 104721787 E-Filed 03/11/2020 03:05:42 PM Case 3:20-cv-04698-TKW-HTC Document 1-19 Filed 03/11/20 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT  TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of SkyWest, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended
December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Bradford R. Rich, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



/s/ BRADFORD R. RICH Bradford R. Rich Executive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerFebruary 25, 2011


This
certification accompanies the Report Amendment pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.33    
    


[Company
Letterhead] 


March 11,
2005 


Nicholas
J. Costanza

Sr. Vice President, General Counsel

& Secretary

The Titan Corporation 



	Re:
	Employment Agreement Extension




Dear
Nick, 


        This
will confirm that the Board of Directors has approved an extension of the term of that certain Employment Agreement between you and the Company dated April 2, 2003 (the
"Employment Agreement"). 


        Accordingly,
the Term of the Employment Agreement, as such term is defined in the Employment Agreement, is hereby extended for an additional two year period, until April 2, 2007,
unless terminated earlier in accordance with the Employment Agreement. 


        All
other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain unaffected by this extension and shall remain in full force and effect. 



Very
truly yours, 


/s/
Gene W. Ray 


Gene
W. Ray

Chairman, CEO and President

The Titan Corporation 











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.33
#### § 29.1032 Length.

The linear measurement of cured tobacco leaves from the butt of the midrib to the extreme tip. Length, as an element of quality, does not apply to tobacco in strip form.

[42 FR 21092, Apr. 25, 1977. Redesignated and amended at 49 FR 16755, Apr. 20, 1984, and further redesignated at 51 FR 25027, July 10, 1986]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsFiber-reinforced ceramic composites for Earth-to-orbit rocket engine turbinesFiber reinforced ceramic matrix composites (FRCMC) are emerging materials systems that offer potential for use in liquid rocket engines. Advantages of these materials in rocket engine turbomachinery include performance gain due to higher turbine inlet temperature, reduced launch costs, reduced maintenance with associated cost benefits, and reduced weight. This program was initiated to assess the state of FRCMC development and to propose a plan for their implementation into liquid rocket engine turbomachinery. A complete range of FRCMC materials was investigated relative to their development status and feasibility for use in the hot gas path of earth-to-orbit rocket engine turbomachinery. Of the candidate systems, carbon fiber-reinforced silicon carbide (C/SiC) offers the greatest near-term potential. Critical hot gas path components were identified, and the first stage inlet nozzle and turbine rotor of the fuel turbopump for the liquid oxygen/hydrogen Space Transportation Main Engine (STME) were selected for conceptual design and analysis. The critical issues associated with the use of FRCMC were identified. Turbine blades were designed, analyzed and fabricated. The Technology Development Plan, completed as Task 5 of this program, provides a course of action for resolution of these issues.Document ID19910006837Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsBrockmeyer, Jerry W.*(Rockwell International Corp. Canoga Park, CA, United States)*Schnittgrund, Gary D.*(Rockwell International Corp. Canoga Park, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1990Subject CategoryNonmetallic MaterialsReport/Patent NumberRI/RD-90-163NASA-CR-185264NAS 1.26:185264Accession Number91N16150Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS3-25468Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910006837.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit
10.7

June 11, 2004

AAA Capital
Management Inc.
 5051 Westheimer – Suite 2100
 Houston,
Texas 77056

Attention: Mr. Anthony Annunziato


Re: Management Agreement Renewals


Dear Mr. Annunziato:

We are writing
with respect to your management agreements concerning the commodity
pools to which reference is made below (the "Management
Agreements"). We are extending the term of the Management
Agreements through June 30, 2005 and all other provisions of the
Management Agreements will remain
unchanged.

		
	• 	Smith Barney AAA Energy Fund
L.P.


		
	• 	SB AAA Master Fund
LLC


		
	• 	Salomon Smith Barney Orion Futures
Fund L.P.


		
	• 	Aurora
2001


		
	• 	Salomon Smith Barney AAA Energy
Fund L.P. II


		
	• 	Aurora III


Please acknowledge receipt of this modification by signing
one copy of this letter and returning it to the attention of Mr. Daniel
McAuliffe at the address above or fax to 212-559-1986. If you have any
questions I can be reached at 212-559-5043.

Very
truly yours,


CITIGROUP MANAGED FUTURES
LLC


		
	By: 	/s/ Daniel R. McAuliffe,
Jr.
 Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.
 Chief Financial Officer and
Director


		
	By: 	/s/ Anthony
Annunziato


Print Name: Anthony Annunziato

DRMcA/sr
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2161 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to extend the reduced interest 

rates for Federal Direct Stafford Loans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 23, 2013 

Mr. GOHMERT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, and in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce and the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to extend 

the reduced interest rates for Federal Direct Stafford Loans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Assisting Students 

5 with Loans Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INTEREST RATE EXTENSION. 

7 Subparagraph (D) of section 455(b)(7) of the Higher 

8 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087e(b)(7)(D)) is 

9 amended— 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2161 IH

1 (1) in the matter preceding clause (i), by strik2 ing ‘‘2013’’ and inserting ‘‘2015’’; and 

3 (2) in clause (v), by striking ‘‘2013’’ and insert4 ing ‘‘2015’’. 

5 SEC. 3. REPEALING PREVENTION AND PUBLIC HEALTH 

6 FUND. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4002 of the Patient Pro8 tection and Affordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 300u–11) is 

9 repealed. 

10 (b) RESCISSION OF UNOBLIGATED FUNDS.—Of the 

11 funds made available by such section 4002, the unobli12 gated balance is rescinded. 

13 SEC. 4. COMPLIANCE WITH STATUTORY PAY-AS-YOU-GO 

14 ACT OF 2010. 

15 The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of 

16 complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, 

17 shall be determined by reference to the latest statement 

18 titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO Legislation’’ for this 

19 Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional Record 

20 by the Chairman of the House Budget Committee, pro21 vided that such statement has been submitted prior to the 

22 vote on passage. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Linnea Mattsson, Individually as Executrix of Johan Mattsson, Deceased, et al., Appellants, v Johns-Manville Products Corp. et al., Respondents.

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on December 11,1979, granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants and dismissing the complaint, unanimously dismissed, without costs and without disbursements. Appellants having been granted leave to replead and having done so, this appeal is moot. *(Halmar Distrs. Corp. v Approved Mfg. Corp.,*49 AD2d 841.) Had we reached the merits, we would have affirmed. *(Thornton v Roosevelt Hosp.,*47 NY2d 780; *Rosenberg v Johns-Manville Sales Corp.,*78 AD2d 784.) Concur — Birns, J. P., Sullivan, Markewich, Silverman and Yesawich, JJ.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTIONS

Appellate case name: Joel Keith Nichols v. The State of Texas

Appellate case numbers: 01-18-01000-CR

Trial court case numbers: 17CR0618

Trial court: 10th District Court of Galveston County

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel, Winifred Weber, filed a motion to withdraw 

and appellate brief in the above-styled case on June 28, 2019, concluding that the abovereferenced appeals are frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 

1396, 1400 (1967). On July 11, 2019, appellant, Joel Keith Nichols, incarcerated and 

acting pro se, filed a pro se motion for access to a copy of the appellate records to prepare 

responses and a motion requesting a 30-day extension of time to file his pro se Anders brief 

response. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 315, 318–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).

Accordingly, the Court grants appellant’s motion requesting access to the records

and orders the district clerk, no later than 10 days from the date of this order, to provide a 

copy of the clerk’s and reporter’s records to the pro se appellant. The trial court clerk shall 

further certify to this Court, within 15 days of the date of this order, the date upon which 

delivery of the records to the appellant is made.

Finally, the Court grants appellant’s motion for an extension of time to file pro se

Anders response. Appellant’s pro se response to his counsel’s Anders brief shall be filed

within 45 days of the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ___/s/ Laura C. Higley____

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __July 16, 2019__
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:98CR47-003LAC

ANDRE MOSES

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on January 31, 2008

Motion/Pleadings: LETTER / MOTION TO REDUCE SENTENCE (18 USC 3582) 

Filed by DEFENDANT PRO SE on 1/31/2008 Doc.# 195

RESPONSES:

BY GOVERNMENT on1/31/08 Doc.# 196

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Mary Maloy

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 1st day of

February, 2008, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) Without prejudice. The retroactive application does not become effective

until 3 March 2008. 

 s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 3:98-cr-00047-LC Document 197 Filed 02/01/08 Page 1 of 1
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

JESSICA J. LYUBLANOVITS

Case 3:20-cv-03678-MCR-ZCB Document 52 Filed 08/03/22 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 3:20-cv-03678-MCR-ZCB Document 52 Filed 08/03/22 Page 2 of 2
#### § 29.2696 Key to standard grademarks.

## Groups

A—Wrappers.

B—Heavy Leaf.

C—Thin Leaf.

X—Lugs.

N—Nondescript.

S—Scrap.

## Qualities

1—Choice.

2—Fine.

3—Good.

4—Fair.

5—Low.

## Colors

L—Light brown.

F—Medium brown.

D—Dark brown.

M—Mixed or variegates.

VF—Greenish medium brown.

G—Green.
#### § 28.304 Original representation of American Pima cotton staple lengths.

The following lengths of American Pima staple are represented by a quantity of cotton in the custody of the United States Department of Agriculture suitably contained and marked “Original Representation of Official Cotton Standards of the United States” followed in each instance by the name of growth, appropriate designation for staple length, and the effective date.

| Staple length (inches) | Effective date |
| --- | --- |
| 15/16 | Aug. 1, 1961. |
| 13/8 | Aug. 10, 1943. |
| 17/16 | Aug. 10, 1943. |
| 11/2 | Aug. 1, 1929. |

[49 FR 28391, July 12, 1984]
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 02920

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 02920\02920_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

02920\02920_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

02920\02920_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 02920\02920_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02920\02920_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02920\02920_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02920\02920_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 02920\02920_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

02920\Certification Statement Plant ID 02920.pdf Plant certification statement

02920\Supplemental Documents\02920_Part A A5-2 Map-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

02920\Supplemental Documents\02920_Part A A5-2 Map-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

02920\Supplemental Documents\02920_Part A A5-2 Map-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

02920\Supplemental Documents\02920_Part A A5-2 Map-4.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

02920\Supplemental Documents\02920_Part A A5-2 Map-5.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

02920\Supplemental Documents\02920_Part A A5-2 Map-6.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02920\Supplemental Documents\02920_Part A A5-3 WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02920\Supplemental Documents\02920_Part A A5-3 WB-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 02920\Supplemental Documents\02920_Part A A5-3 WB-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
_______________________________________ __ 

### Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



## September 9, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice



## 136684 Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n 

## PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, J ustices



## v SC: 136684 COA: 277619 Wayne CC: 05-006850-01 ULYSSES WYNN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 29, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

t0828 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 9, 2008

Clerk
#### Frieda Duboys, Respondent, v. Sidney Duboys, Appellant.

In an action for separation, the defendant husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau .County, dated August 9, 1968 which granted the plaintiff wife’s motion, *inter ajda,*for temporary alimony and for a counsel fee. Order reversed, on the law .and the facts, without costs, and motion denied, without prejudice to renewal should defendant, pending trial, cease to support and maintain plaintiff and their children as heretofore. Since it appears that defendant 'has continued to support and maintain plaintiff and their children in the same style and manner as he did before this action was instituted and that plaintiff has ample means of her own, there is no basis for a *pendente lite*award of alimony and counsel fees, for such allowances are based on a showing of necessity *(Swinson*v. *Swinson,*29 A D 2d 693; *Friedman*v. *Friedman,*5 A D 2d 864; cf. *Glazer*v. *Glazer,*12 A D 2d 936). Nor, in our opinion, does the record warrant exclusion of defendant from his own home (cf. *Epstein*v. *Epstein,*29 A D 2d 545). The parties’ 20-year-old son boards at college and their daughter is .a high school senior. In the circumstances, and in view of the foregoing, we deem an award of custody to be inappropriate (see, also, *Le Henaff*v. *Le Henaff,*20 A D 2d 569). The action should proceed to trial promptly. If warranted by .the proof, the trial court may make an appropriate allowance *nwna pro tune*as of the return day of the motion presently under review *(Light*v. *Light,*29 A D 2d 540). The decision on this appeal is without prejudice to any such determination. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.