1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

WASHINGTON, DC

Regulatory Docket No. _______________

IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION FOR EXEMPTION OF:

Steven Roote

FOR AN EXEMPTION SEEKING RELIEF FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF

TITLE 14 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS

SECTIONS 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1),

91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), AND 91.417(a) & (b) CONCERNING COMMERCIAL

OPERATION OF DJI PHANTOM 2 Vision Plus UNMANNED AIRCRAFT

SYSTEM

PURSUANT TO SECTION 333 OF

THE FAA MODERNIZATION AND REFORM ACT OF 2012

(PUBLIC LAW 112-95)

Submitted on May 26th, 2015

Steven Roote

840 State Street

Boyne City, MI 49712

(231) 218-3953
2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS.........................................................................................................3

SUMMARY......................................................................................................................................................4

INTRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF PETITIONER................................................................4

BACKGROUND...........................................................................................................................................4

BASIS FOR PETITION...............................................................................................................................5

NAME AND ADDRESS OF PETITIONER..........................................................................................7

THE SPECIFIC SECTIONS OF 14 C.F.R. FROM WHICH STEVEN ROOTE

SEEKS EXEMPTION.................................................................................................................................8

THE EXTENT OF RELIEF STEVEN ROOTE SEEKS AND THE REASON

STEVEN ROOTE SEEKS THE RELIEF............................................................................................10

THE REASONS WHY GRANTING STEVEN ROOTE

REQUEST WOULD BE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST ...............................................................14

THE REASONS WHY GRANTING THE EXEMPTION WOULD NOT

ADVERSELY AFFECT SAFETY...........................................................................................................16

SUMMARY THAT CAN BE PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER.............................30

ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, VIEWS, OR ARGUMENTS

AVAILABLE TO SUPPORT STEVEN ROOTE REQUEST.........................................................30

CONCLUSION............................................................................................................................................31

APPENDICES..............................................................................................................................................32
3

GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS

AGL Above Ground Level

AOI Area of Interest

ATC Air Traffic Control

ATO Air Traffic Organization

AV Aerial Vehicle

CFR Code of Federal Regulations

COA Certificate of Authorization

FAA Federal Aviation Administration

FAR Federal Aviation Regulation

GCS Ground Control Station

GPS Global Positioning System

LOL Loss of Link

NAS National Airspace System

NOTAM Notice to Airman

PIC Pilot In Command

Section 333 FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) Section 333

SO Safety Observer

SOP Standard Operating Procedures

UA Unmanned Aircraft

UAS Unmanned Aircraft System

VFR Visual Flight Rules

VLOS Visual Line of Site

VMC Visual Meteorological Conditions

VTOL Vertical Takeoff and Landing
4

SUMMARY

Steven Roote seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 

91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a) (2), and 91.417(a) & (b), to 

operate an Unmanned Aircraft System pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and 

Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA). This exemption will permit Steven Roote to operate an Unmanned 

Aircraft System (UAS) for the commercial purpose of conducting aerial video and photography of 

construction sites, real estate, and landscape over certain areas of the United States.

INTRODUCTION AND INTERESTS OF THE PETITIONER

Steven Roote provides his clients with expertise and knowledge in advanced technologies 

and solutions to increase efficiency, productivity and effectiveness. Steven Roote has over 16 years 

of professional experience in Video Production and is recognized as an expert in Corporate Video 

Production and video project management. He has over 14 years recreational/hobby experience in 

all aspects of aerial video and photography. The objective of Steven Roote’s aerial video and 

photography operations is to provide high quality imaging for a variety of commercial, public, and

residential uses, specifically targeting:

 Construction sites before and after

 Appraisals

 Real-estate marketing

 Motion Picture Filming

 Aerial acquisitions used for inspections of public and private structures.

 Search and Rescue operations

BACKGROUND

Unmanned Aircraft Systems: DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs

Steven Roote seeks an exemption to operate DJI systems for compensation or hire within 

the NAS. The DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs are vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) 
5

Unmanned Aircraft (UA) with a Ground Control Station (GCS) utilizing electronic tablet or smart 

phone systems. The DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus has a maximum gross weight of approximately 2 

pounds 12 ounces, while having a length of 16 inches width of 16 inches, height of 8 inches, and a 

maximum speed of approximately 29 knots. The DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UAs are equipped 

with four main rotors; driven by Lithium Polymer battery powered electric motors.

The DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UAs that will be operated by Steven Roote will be 

registered in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 44103, Registration of Aircraft, as well as 14 C.F.R Part 47, 

Aircraft Registration, and marked in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 45, Identification and Registration 

Marking.

BASIS FOR PETITION

Petitioner, Steven Roote, pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 

C.F.R. § 11.61) and the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), Section 333, Special 

Rules for Certain Unmanned Aircraft Systems, hereby petitions the Administrator to commercially operate 

the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs in the National Airspace System (NAS), and for an exemption

from the requirements of 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a),

91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b).

In consideration of the speed, weight, size, and limited operating area associated with the 

unmanned aircraft and its operation, Steven Roote operation of DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs 

meets the conditions of FMRA Section 333 and therefore, will not require an airworthiness 

certificate in accordance with 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H.

Accordingly, Steven Roote requests relief from Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) 

& (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), as these sections set forth requirements for maintenance that only 
6

apply to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate. Steven Roote submits that the requested relief is 

proper since an equivalent level of safety will be ensured. Steven Roote will use experienced

personnel or technicians to perform maintenance, alterations, or preventive maintenance on the 

UASs using the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed in the operating documents (i.e., 

Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus Instruction Manual). Furthermore, 

Steven Roote will document and maintain all maintenance records for the DJI Phantom 2 Vision 

Plus UASs.

Relief from certain requirements of Section 61.113(a) and (b), entitled Private pilot privileges and 

limitations: Pilot in command, is requested by Steven Roote to the extent necessary to allow a Pilot in 

Command (PIC) not holding a certificate, or an airman medical certificate, and who has

demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight-hour and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to 

safely operate the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs in a manner consistent with this exemption, 

including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, 

vessels, vehicles and structures.

Steven Roote seeks relief from Section 91.7(a), entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness, because the 

DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs do not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 

C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. As such, Steven Roote submits that he will ensure that the DJI Phantom

2 Vision Plus UASs are

in an airworthy condition, prior to every flight, by determining that the UASs are in compliance with 

the operating documents (i.e., Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus

Instruction Manual), and that the aircraft are in a condition for safe flight.

Steven Roote also seeks an exemption from the requirements of Section 91.121, entitled 

Altimeter Settings, as the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UAs will not have a typical barometric altimeter 

onboard. However, altitude information of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UAs will be provided to 
7

the PIC via Global Positioning System (GPS) equipment and radio communications telemetry data 

link, which own links from the UA to the GCS for active monitoring of the flight path. This altitude 

information, combined with Steven Roote’s operation of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs 

within visual line of sight, at or below 400 feet AGL, will ensure a level of safety equivalent to

Section 91.121.

Additionally, Steven Roote seeks an exemption from the requirements of Section 91.151(b), 

entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions. Steven Roote submits that safety will not be

affected by operation of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UAs during daylight hours in visual 

meteorological conditions (VMC) under visual flight rules (VFR), with enough battery power to fly 

for a total duration of approximately 13.5 minutes to the first point of intended landing and, 

assuming normal

cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 4.5 minutes.

In accordance with 14 C.F.R. § 11.81, Steven Roote provides the following information in 

support of its petition for exemption:

A. Name And Address Of The Petitioner.

The name and address of the Petitioner and point of contact is:

Steven Roote

840 State Street

Boyne City, MI 49712

Email: ourgreenhorizons@gmail.com

B. The Specific Sections Of 14 C.F.R. From Which Steven Roote Seeks Exemption.

1. Steven Roote Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 61.113(a) And (b).

Section 61.113, entitled Private pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in command, subsections (a) and 

(b) prescribe the following, in relevant part:

(a) No person who holds a private pilot certificate may act as a pilot in command (PIC) 

of an aircraft that is carrying passengers or property for compensation or hire; nor 

may that person, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft.
8

(b) A private pilot may, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft in connection 

with any business or employment if—

(1) The flight is only incidental to that business or employment; and

(2) The aircraft does not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire.

2. Steven Roote Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.7(a).

Section 91.7, entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness, subsection (a), states the following:

(a) No person may operate a civil aircraft unless it is in an airworthy condition.

3. Steven Roote Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.121.

Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter settings, subsection (a), states the following, in part:

(a) Each person operating an aircraft shall maintain the cruising altitude or flight level of 

that aircraft, as the case may be, by reference to an altimeter that is set, when 

operating—

(1) Below 18,000 feet MSL, to--

(i) The current reported altimeter setting of a station along the route and within 

100 nautical miles of the aircraft;

(ii) If there is no station within the area prescribed in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this 

section, the current reported altimeter setting of an appropriate available 

station; or

(iii) In the case of an aircraft not equipped with a radio, the elevation of the

departure airport or an appropriate altimeter setting available before

departure.

4. Steven Roote Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.151(b).

Section 91.151, entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions, subsection (b), states the following:

(b) No person may begin a flight in a rotorcraft under VFR conditions unless (considering wind and 

forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the first point of intended landing and, 

assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 20 minutes.

5. Steven Roote Seeks Exemption From The Requirement Of Section 91.405(a).

Section 91.405, entitled Maintenance required, subsection (a), states the following:

Each owner or operator of an aircraft—
9

(a) Shall have that aircraft inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall 

between required inspections, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, have 

discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 of this chapter[.]

6. Steven Roote Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.407(a)(1)

Section 91.407, entitled Operation after maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration, 

subsection (a)(1), states the following:

(a) No person may operate any aircraft that has undergone maintenance, preventive

maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration unless--

(1) It has been approved for return to service by a person authorized under § 43.7 of 

this chapter[.]

7. Steven Roote Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections 91.409(a)(1) And 

91.409(a)(2).

Section 91.409, entitled Inspections, subsection (a), states the following:

(a) Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, no person may operate an aircraft 

unless, within the preceding 12 calendar months, it has had –

(1) An annual inspection in accordance with part 43 of this chapter and has been approved 

for return to service by a person authorized by § 43.7 of this chapter; or

(2) An inspection for the issuance of an airworthiness certificate in accordance with part 21 

of this chapter.

8. Steven Roote Seeks Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections 91.417(a) And

91.417(b).

Section 91.417, entitled Maintenance records, subsections (a) and (b), state the following:

(a) Except for work performed in accordance with §§ 91.411 and 91.413, each registered 

owner or operator shall keep the following records for the periods specified in paragraph 

(b) of this section:

(1) Records of the maintenance, preventive maintenance, and alteration and records of the 

100-hour, annual, progressive, and other required or approved inspections, as 

appropriate, for each aircraft (including the airframe) and each engine, propeller, rotor, 

and appliance of an aircraft. The records must include—

(i) A description (or reference to data acceptable to the Administrator) of the 

work performed; and
10

(ii) The date of completion of the work performed; and

(iii) The signature, and certificate number of the person approving the aircraft for 

return to service.

(2) Records containing the following information:

(i) The total time in service of the airframe, each engine, each propeller, and each rotor.

(ii) The current status of life-limited parts of each airframe, engine, propeller, rotor, and 

appliance.

(iii) The time since last overhaul of all items installed on the aircraft which are required 

to be overhauled on a specified time basis.

(iv) The current inspection status of the aircraft, including the time since the last

inspection required by the inspection program under which the aircraft and its 

appliances are maintained.

(v) The current status of applicable airworthiness directives (AD) and safety directives 

including, for each, the method of compliance, the AD or safety directive number 

and revision date. If the AD or safety directive involves recurring action, the time 

and date when the next action is required.

(vi) Copies of the forms prescribed by § 43.9(d) of this chapter for each major alteration 

to the airframe and currently installed engines, rotors, propellers, and appliances.

(b) The owner or operator shall retain the following records for the periods prescribed:

(1) The records specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall be retained

until the work is repeated or superseded by other work or for 1 year after the

work is performed.

(2) The records specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section shall be retained and 

transferred with the aircraft at the time the aircraft is sold.

(3) A list of defects furnished to a registered owner or operator under § 43.11 of this 

chapter shall be retained until the defects are repaired and the aircraft is approved for 

return to service.

C. The Extent Of Relief Steven Roote Seeks And The Reason Steven Roote Seeks The 

Relief.

1. Extent Of Relief Steven Roote Seeks And The Reason Steven Roote Seeks Relief From 

Section 61.113(a) And (b).

Relief from Section 61.113(a) and (b) entitled Private pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in 

command, is requested to the extent necessary to allow a PIC not holding any pilot certificate, or a 

current and valid airman medical certificate, but who has met certain flight-hour and currency 

requirements, to conduct the proposed UAS flight operations for compensation or hire.
11

This relief is requested since the limitations set forth in Section 61.113(a) and (b) state that a 

private pilot may, for compensation or hire, act as PIC of an aircraft in connection with any business 

or employment if: 

(1) The flight is only incidental to that business or employment; and 

(2) The aircraft does not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire.

As set forth more fully below, Steven Roote submits that an equivalent level of safety will be

maintained because no PIC will be allowed to operate the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UAS unless 

that PIC has met certain flight-hour and currency requirements, demonstrating that the PIC is able 

to safely operate the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus in a manner consistent with the operations 

specifications as described in this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers, as well as 

maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures.

Further, Steven Roote submits that all flights of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs, conducted 

by the PIC pursuant to the grant of this Petition: 

(1) will be incidental to Steven Roote's business; and 

(2) will not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire.

2. Extent Of Relief Steven Roote Seeks And The Reason Steven Roote Seeks Relief From 

Section 91.7(a).

Relief from Section 91.7(a) entitled Civil aircraft airworthiness, is requested to the extent required to 

allow Steven Roote to determine that the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs are in airworthy 

condition prior to every flight by ensuring that the UAS is in compliance with the operating 

documents (i.e., the Steven Roote Aerial Operations Manual, Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI 

Phantom 2 Vision Plus Instruction Manual). Steven Roote seeks the requested relief because the 

DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs do not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 

C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. Therefore, Steven Roote will ensure that the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus
12

UASs are in airworthy condition based upon its compliance with the operating documents (i.e., 

Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus Instruction Manual) prior to every 

flight, and further, determine that the aircraft are in condition for safe flight, as stated in the 

conditions and limitations below.

Extent Of Relief Steven Roote, Seeks From Section 91.121.

Relief from Section 91.121, entitled Altimeter settings, may be required to allow flight operations of 

the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs, which utilize a barometric pressure sensor, GPS equipment, 

and a radio communications telemetry data link to downlink altitude information from the UA to 

the PIC at the ground control station (GCS). Since the FAA requires that any altitude information 

concerning UAS operations be reported to air traffic control (ATC) in feet above ground level 

(AGL), Steven Roote seeks the requested relief because the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UA’s 

altimeter may be set on the ground to zero feet AGL, rather than the local barometric pressure or 

field altitude, before each flight.

Considering the limited altitude of the proposed operations, relief from 14 CFR 91.121 is sought to 

the extent necessary to comply with the applicable conditions and limitations stated below. As more 

fully set forth herein, an equivalent level of safety will be maintained since the DJI Phantom 2 

Vision Plus UAs are equipped with a barometric pressure sensor and GPS equipment, which 

automatically ensures that a ground level pressure setting will be established prior to each flight, and 

provides the PIC with altitude information of the UA on the heads-up display of the GCS.

4. Extent Of Relief Steven Roote Seeks And The Reason Steven Roote Seeks Relief From 

Section 91.151(b).

Relief from Section 91.151(b) entitled Fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions, is requested 

to the extent required to allow flights of the battery powered DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UAs 

during daylight hours in visual meteorological conditions (VMC), under visual flight rules (VFR), for 
13

a total duration of 13.5 minutes to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising 

speed, to fly after that for at least 4.5 minutes. Steven Roote seeks the requested relief because 

without an exemption from Section 91.151(b), the flight time duration of the battery powered DJI 

Phantom 2 Vision Plus UAs will severely constrain the practicality of any aerial video or still photo

flight operations that Steven Roote proposes to conduct pursuant to this Petition. Significantly, as 

set forth below, the technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs, the DJI 

Phantom 2 Vision Plus operating documents, and Steven Roote’s proposed operating limitations, 

ensure that Steven Roote will safely operate the battery powered DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAs 

during daylight hours in visual meteorological conditions (VMC), under visual flight rules (VFR), 

with enough battery power to fly for a total duration of 13.5 minutes to the first point of intended

landing and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 4.5 minutes.

5. Extent Of Relief Steven Roote Seeks And The Reason Steven Roote Seeks Relief From 

Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), And 91.417(a) & (b).

Since Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) only apply to 

aircraft with an airworthiness certificate, Steven Roote requests relief from these Sections because 

the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs do not require airworthiness certificates. As set forth more 

fully below, the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs meet the conditions of FMRA Section 333 for 

operation without an airworthiness certificate. Accordingly, Steven Roote will use trained technicians 

to perform maintenance, alterations, or preventive maintenance on the UASs using the methods, 

techniques, and practices prescribed in the UAS operating documents (i.e., the Steven Roote Aerial 

Operations Manual, Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus Professional 

Instruction Manual). Furthermore, Steven Roote will document and maintain all maintenance 

records for the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs.
14

D. The Reasons Why Granting Steven Roote Request Would Be In The Public Interest; 

That Is, How It Would Benefit The Public As A Whole.

Granting the present Petition will further the public interest by allowing Steven Roote to safely, 

efficiently, and economically perform aerial video and photography of construction sites, real estate, 

and landscape over certain areas of the United States.

Additionally, use of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs will decrease congestion of the NAS, 

reduce pollution, and provide significant benefits to the economy. Notably, the benefits of Steven 

Roote's proposed operation of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs will be realized without 

implicating any privacy issues.

1. The Public Will Benefit From Decreased Congestion Of The NAS.

The DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UAs are battery powered and serve as a safe, efficient, and 

economical alternative to the manned aircraft traditionally utilized to obtain aerial imagery. By 

reducing the amount of manned aircraft needed to perform aerial acquisitions, an exemption 

allowing the use of a DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UAS would reduce the amount of manned aircraft 

in the NAS, reduce noise and air pollution, as well as increase the safety of life and property in the 

air and on the ground.

Furthermore, by reducing the number of manned aircraft operating in the NAS, congestion around 

airports caused by arriving and departing aircraft will be reduced. The DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus

UAs do not require an airport to takeoff or land. Likewise, a reduction of manned aircraft 

conducting aerial video and photography missions would result in fewer aircraft that must be 

handled by air traffic control during the ground, takeoff, departure, arrival, and landing phases of 

flight operations.

2. The Public Will Benefit From The Safety And Efficiency Of The DJI Phantom 2 Vision 

Plus UASs.
15

Conducting aerial acquisitions with the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs, instead of manned 

aircraft, will greatly benefit the public by drastically reducing the levels of air and noise pollution 

generated during traditional aerial video and still photography flight operations. By using battery 

power and electric motors, the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs produce no air pollution, and is 

the most viable environmentally conscious alternative to the cabin class, six cylinder internal 

combustion engine aircraft that are typically utilized for aerial video and photography, while burning 

approximately 20-30 gallons per hour of leaded aviation fuel. The DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UAs, 

while reducing the carbon footprint of aerial acquisitions, also eliminates noise pollution, as the UAs 

are propelled by battery powered electric motors, rather than an internal combustion engine. By 

using the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs to perform aerial acquisitions, the substantial risk to life 

and property in the air and on the ground, which is usually associated with traditional manned 

aircraft flight operations, will be substantially reduced or completely eliminated. Aside from the lack 

of flight crew members located onboard the aircraft, the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UAs (weighing 

approximately 2 pounds 12 ounces, at their maximum gross weights with lengths and widths of 16 

inches, and with no fuel on board), has less physical potential for collateral damage to life and 

property on the ground, and in the air, compared to the manned aircraft that typically conduct 

similar operations (weighing approximately 6,000 pounds with a wingspan of approximately 42 feet, 

a length of 34 feet, and a fuel capacity of 180 gallons).

3. Performing Aerial Video and Photography Operations With The DJI Phantom 2 Vision 

Plus UASs Will Benefit The Economy.

In addition to being safe and efficient, the DJI Phantom 2 Vision PlusUASs are also an economical 

alternative to using manned aircraft to conduct similar aerial operations. As such, operation of the 

DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs will allow United States based companies, like Steven Roote, to 

remain competitive and contribute to growth of the U.S. economy. Specifically, with the rising cost 
16

of aviation fuel and the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) regulatory actions phasing out 

leaded aviation fuels, U.S. owned and operated companies must adopt new and alternative 

technology in order to remain competitive. Operating the battery powered DJI Phantom 2 Vision

Plus UASs is one such technology that not only allows companies greater operational flexibility

compared to manned aircraft, but provides such flexibility without the high operational cost of a 

traditional manned aircraft.

By operating the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs, companies such as Steven Roote, can remain 

competitive and profitable, and therefore, provide greater job stability to employees and contractors, 

which will ultimately contribute to growth of the U.S. economy. Improved financial performance of 

U.S. companies, through commercial use of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs, provides a stable 

workforce that increases consumer spending; improves local, state, and federal tax revenues; and 

allows companies to invest in research and development in order to remain competitive both in the 

United States and abroad.

4. There Are No Privacy Issues.

Similar to the manned aerial acquisition flight operations that have been conducted for decades, 

Steven Roote's proposed operation of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs will not implicate any 

privacy issues. Specifically, the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs will be operated only in 

compliance with operating documents (i.e., the Steven Roote Aerial Operations Manual, Monthly

Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus Instruction Manual) which requires property 

owner involvement as well as local law enforcement notification, and in accordance with the Federal 

Aviation Regulations, including the minimum altitude requirements of 14 C.F.R. § 91.119.

E. The Reasons Why Granting The Exemption Would Not Adversely Affect Safety, Or How 

The Exemption Would Provide A Level Of Safety At Least Equal To That Provided By The 

Rule From Which Steven Roote Seeks Exemption.
17

1. Reasons Why The DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAs Meet The Conditions Of

The FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) Section 333.

In consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the unmanned 

aircraft and its operation, Steven Roote operation of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs meet the 

conditions of FMRA Section 333, and will not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 

14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H. Section 333 provides authority for a UAS to operate without 

airworthiness certification and sets forth requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a

hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security. 

Specifically, FMRA Section 333 states the following, in part: 

(a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other requirement of this subtitle, and not later than 180 days 

after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall determine if certain 

unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national airspace system before completion of the 

plan and rulemaking required by section 332 of this Act or the guidance required by section 334 of 

this Act.

(b) Assessment of Unmanned Aircraft Systems.--In making the determination under subsection (a), the 

Secretary shall determine, at a minimum—

(1) which types of unmanned aircraft systems, if any, as a result of their size, weight, speed, 

operational capability, proximity to airports and populated areas, and operation within visual line of 

sight do not create a hazard to users of the national airspace system or the public or pose a

threat to national security; and

(2) whether a certificate of waiver, certificate of authorization, or airworthiness certification under 

section 44704 of title 49, United States Code, is required for the operation of unmanned aircraft 

systems identified under paragraph (1).

(c) Requirements for Safe Operation.--If the Secretary determines under this section that certain 

unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national airspace system, the Secretary shall 

establish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft systems in the national airspace system.

In seeking this exemption, Steven Roote submits that the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs can 

operate safely in the NAS pursuant to FMRA Section 333, as demonstrated by: (a) the characteristics 

of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs; (b) the pilot certification requirement; and (c) the specific 

operating limitations.
18

a. The Specifications Of The DJI Phantom 3 Professional UASs Demonstrate Its Safe 

Characteristics.

The DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs do not create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public, or 

otherwise pose a threat to national security considering its size, weight, speed, and operational 

capability.

i. Technical Specifications Of The DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs.

The technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs are set forth by the DJI 

Phantom 2 Vision Plus Specifications, attached hereto as Exhibit A.

ii. The DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs Autonomous Flight And Navigation Modes 

Enable The UASs To Remain Within A Defined Operational Area.

The DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs may be operated in both manual and fully autonomous flight 

modes. A complete description of the flight and navigational modes of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision 

Plus UASs is provided at pages 39-47 of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus User Manual, attached 

hereto as Exhibit B.

iii. The DJI Phantom 3 Professional UASs Are Designed For Automatic Return To Home 

Point Or Hover In The Event Of Loss Of The Control Link Or Navigation.

When the Control Link is lost, the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UAs will remain stationary, in flight, 

for 3 seconds or more. If, after 3 seconds, the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UAs do not reacquire

control link data from the GCS, the UAs will assume that the Control Link is lost and the UAs will 

return to the home position (i.e., failsafe mode) via GPS, and will descend to the takeoff position 

and shutdown.

A complete description of the Failsafe Functions of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UAS are set 

forth at page 27 of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus User Manual, attached hereto as Exhibit B.

iv. The DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus GCS And Its Operation.
19

A complete description of the operation and specifications of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus GCS 

and flight control software is provided at pages 32 through 39 of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus

User Manual.

DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus User Manual is attached hereto as Exhibit B.

b. Flight Operations Of DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs Are Limited To The Line Of Sight 

Of A Pilot in Command With A Safety Observer.

Steven Roote will only utilize pilots who have at least 20 hours flight time to act as a pilot in 

command (PIC) of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs. Additionally, a safety observer will assist 

all pilots during flight time.

c. Flights Of DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs Will Be Conducted Pursuant To Specific 

Operating Limitations.

In seeking this exemption, Steven Roote proposes to commercially operate DJI Phantom 2 Vision 

Plus UASs for the special purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of 

United States, pursuant to the following specific operating limitations:

1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption will be limited to the following

aircraft described in the operating documents, rotorcraft UASs weighing less

than 55 pounds maximum gross weight: DJI Phantom 3 Professional Unmanned

Aircraft Systems. Proposed operations of any other aircraft will require a new

petition or a petition to amend this grant.

2. UAS operations under this exemption will be limited to conducting operations

for the purpose of aerial video and photography.

3. The UAs may not be flown at an indicated airspeed exceeding 20 knots.

4. The UA must be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet above ground

level (AGL), as indicated by the procedures specified in the operating documents 

unless a special request is made and approved by ATC. All altitudes reported to ATC 

must be in feet AGL.

5. The UAs must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at all

times. This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any device 

other than corrective lenses, as specified on the PIC’s FAA-issued airman medical 

certificate.
20

6. The use of first person view (FPV) by the PIC or safety observer (SO) is not

permitted.

7. All operations must utilize a safety observer (SO). The SO may be used to satisfy the 

VLOS requirement as long as the PIC always maintains VLOS capability. The SO 

and PIC must be able to communicate verbally at all times. Electronic messaging or 

texting is not permitted during flight operations. The PIC must be designated before 

the flight and cannot transfer his or her designation for the duration of the flight. 

The PIC must ensure that the SO can perform the

functions prescribed in the operating documents.

8. The SO must not perform any other duties beyond assisting the PIC with seeing and 

avoiding other air traffic and other ground based obstacles/obstructions and is not 

permitted to operate the camera or other instruments.

9. The operating documents and the grant of exemption must be accessible during

UAS operations and made available to the Administrator upon request. If a

discrepancy exists between the conditions and limitations contained in the grant of 

exemption and the procedures outlined in the operating documents, the conditions 

and limitations contained in the grant of exemption take precedence and must be 

followed. Otherwise, the operator must follow the procedures as

outlined in its operating documents. The operator may update or revise its operating 

documents. It is the operator’s responsibility to track such revisions and present 

updated and revised documents to the Administrator upon request. The operator 

must also present updated and revised documents if it petitions for extension or 

amendment to the grant of exemption. If the operator determines that any update or 

revision would affect the basis upon which the FAA granted the exemption, then the 

operator must petition for amendment to its grant of exemption. The FAA’s UAS 

Integration Office (AFS-80) may be contacted if questions arise regarding updates or 

revisions to the operating documents.

10. Prior to each flight the PIC must inspect the UAS to ensure that it is in a condition 

for safe flight. If the inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of 

the UAS, the aircraft is prohibited from operating until the necessary maintenance 

has been performed and the UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight. The 

Ground Control Station must be included in the preflight inspection. All 

maintenance and alterations must be properly documented in the aircraft records.

11. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS

operation or flight characteristics, e.g. replacement of a flight critical component, 

must undergo a functional test flight. The PIC who conducts the functional test 

flight must make an entry in the aircraft records.

12. The pre-flight inspection must account for all potential discrepancies, e.g. inoperable 

components, items, or equipment, not already covered in the relevant sections of the 

operating documents.
21

13. The operator must follow the UAS manufacturer’s aircraft/component,

maintenance, overhaul, replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements.

14. The operator must carry out its maintenance, inspections, and record keeping

requirements, in accordance with the operating documents. Maintenance, inspection, 

alterations, and status of replacement/overhaul component parts must be noted in 

the aircraft records, including total time in service, description of work

accomplished, and the signature of the authorized person returning the UAS to 

service.

15. Each UASs operated under this exemption must comply with all manufacturer Safety 

Bulletins.

16. The authorized person must make an entry in the aircraft record of the corrective 

action taken against discrepancies discovered between inspections.

17. The PIC must have completed at least 25 hours of flight time.

18. The operator may not permit any PIC to operate unless the PIC meets the operator’s 

qualification criteria and demonstrates the ability to safely operate the UAS in a 

manner consistent with how the UAS will be operated under the exemption, 

including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances 

from persons, vessels, vehicles and structures. PIC qualification flight hours must be 

logged in a manner consistent with 14 C.F.R. § 61.51(b). Flights for the purposes of 

training the operator’s PICs are permitted under the terms of the exemption. 

However, training operations may only be conducted during dedicated training 

sessions. During training, proficiency, and experience-building flights, all persons not 

essential for flight operations are considered nonparticipants, and the PIC must 

operate the UA with appropriate distance from nonparticipants in accordance with 

14 C.F.R. § 91.119.

19. UAS operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 C.F.R. § 1.1. 

All operations must be conducted under visual meteorological conditions (VMC). If 

flight at night is required, a special request will be made at the FAA office closest to 

proposed area of operations. Flights under special visual flight rules (SVFR) are not 

authorized.

20. The UA may not operate within 2 nautical miles of an airport reference point as

denoted on a current FAA-published aeronautical chart unless a letter of agreement 

with that airport’s management is obtained, and the operation is conducted in 

accordance with a NOTAM as required by the operator’s COA. The letter of 

agreement with the airport management must be made available to the Administrator 

upon request.

21. The UA may not be operated less than 400 feet below or less than 2,000 feet

horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the PIC.
22

22. If the UA loses communications or loses its GPS signal, it must return to a 

predetermined location within the planned operating area and land or be recovered

in accordance with the operating documents.

23. The PIC must abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies 

in accordance with the operating documents.

24. The PIC is prohibited from beginning a flight unless (considering wind and forecast 

weather conditions) there is enough power to fly at normal cruising speed to the 

intended landing point and land the UA with 25% battery power remaining.

25. The operator must obtain an Air Traffic Organization (ATO) issued Certificate of 

Waiver or Authorization (COA) prior to conducting any operations under the grant 

of exemption. This COA will also require the operator to request a Notice to Airman 

(NOTAM) not more than 72 hours in advance, but not less than 48 hours prior to 

the operation. All operations shall be conducted in accordance with airspace 

requirements in the ATO issued COA including class of airspace, altitude level and 

potential transponder requirements.

26. All aircraft operated in accordance with the exemption must be identified by serial 

number, registered in accordance with 14 C.F.R. part 47, and have identification (NNumber) markings in accordance with 14 C.F.R. part 45, Subpart C. Markings must 

be as large as practicable.

27. Before conducting operations, the radio frequency spectrum used for operation and 

control of the UA must comply with the Federal Communications Commission 

(FCC) or other appropriate government oversight agency requirements.

28. The documents required fewer than 14 C.F.R. 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to 

the PIC at the Ground Control Station of the UAS any time the UAS is operating. 

These documents must be made available to the Administrator or any law 

enforcement official upon request.

29. The UA must remain clear and yield the right of way to all manned aviation

operations and activities at all times.

30. The UAS may not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle.

31. Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonparticipating

persons (persons other than the PIC, SO, operator trainees or essential persons),

vessels, vehicles, and structures unless:

a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect nonparticipating

persons from the UA and/or debris in the event of an accident. The operator 

must ensure that nonparticipating persons remain under such protection. If a 

situation arises where nonparticipating persons leave such protection and are 

within 500 feet of the UA, flight operations must cease immediately and/or;
23

b. The aircraft is operated near vessels, vehicles or structures where the

owner/controller of such vessels, vehicles or structures has granted

permission and the PIC has made a safety assessment of the risk of operating 

closer to those objects and determined that it does not present an undue 

hazard, and;

c. Operations nearer to the PIC, SO, operator trainees or essential persons do 

not present an undue hazard to those persons per § 91.119(a).

32. All operations shall be conducted over private or controlled-access property with 

permission from the land owner/controller or authorized representative. Permission 

from land owner/controller or authorized representative will be obtained for each 

flight to be conducted.

33. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical 

boundaries of the operational area as defined by the applicable COA must be 

reported to the FAA's UAS Integration Office (AFS-80) within 24 hours. Accidents 

must be reported to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) per 

instructions contained on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov.

2. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 61.113(a) And (b) Would 

Not Adversely Affect Safety.

Steven Roote submits that the equivalent level of safety established by Section 61.113(a) and (b) will 

be maintained because no PIC will be allowed to operate the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs 

unless that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight-hour and currency requirements, that 

the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UAS in a manner consistent with 

the exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances 

from people, vessels, vehicles and structures. Considering Steven Roote's proposed area of 

operations, and the operating limitations set forth-above; the parallel nature of aeronautical 

knowledge requirements to those of commercial pilot requirements (See Exemption No. 11062); 

and the airmanship skills necessary to safely operate the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus, Steven Roote 

submits that the additional manned airmanship experience of a commercially certificated pilot would 

not correlate to the airmanship skills necessary for Steven Roote's specific proposed flight 

operations.
24

The FAA has previously granted relief from Section 61.113(a) and (b) specific to UAS, in 

circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 

11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 

11156, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).

Steven Roote will not allow any PIC to operate the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UAS unless that PIC 

has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight-hour requirements or the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus

UAS training and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom 2 

Vision Plus UAS in a manner consistent with this exemption, including evasive and emergency 

maneuvers and maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures.

Specifically, the PIC must have accumulated and logged, in a manner consistent with 14 C.F.R. § 

61.51(b), 25 hours of total time as a UAS rotorcraft pilot (with a minimum of 5 hours of those hours 

as a UAS pilot operating the same make and model of UAS to be used for operations under the 

exemption). In addition to the hour requirements, the PIC must accomplish 3 takeoffs and landings 

in the preceding 90 days (for currency purposes).

As in Exemption Nos. 11062, 11138, and 11153, prior documented flight experience that was 

obtained in compliance with applicable regulations will ensure an equivalent level of safety during 

Steven Roote's proposed operations. The Administrator has held that prior documented flight 

experience that was obtained in compliance with applicable regulations would ensure safe 

operations, stating as follows:

In Exemption No. 11062, the FAA required that prior to conducting operations for the purpose of 

motion picture filming (or similar operations), the PIC must have accumulated and logged, in a 

manner consistent with 14 CFR 61.51(b), 25 hours of total time as a UAS rotorcraft pilot including 

at least 10 hours logged as a UAS pilot with a multi-rotor UAS. Prior to operations under 
25

Exemption No. 11062, the PIC must also have accumulated and logged a minimum of 5 hours as a 

UAS pilot operating the same make and model of UAS to be used for operations under the

exemption. For clarification, the FAA considers these minimum hour requirements to be inclusive 

rather than additive; i.e. 5 hours make and model time may be included in the 10 hours of multirotor time and the 10 hours may be included in the total 25 hours of UAS rotorcraft time. In 

addition to the hour requirements, the PIC must accomplish 3 takeoffs and landings in the 

preceding 90 days (for currency purposes). The FAA finds that at a minimum, the flight-hour 

requirements in Exemption No. 11062 are appropriate to practice and build proficiency in the

skills necessary to safely conduct the petitioner’s proposed operations. The FAA also finds that prior 

documented flight experience that was obtained in compliance with applicable regulations would 

satisfy this requirement. Training, proficiency, and experience-building flights can also be conducted 

under the grant of exemption to accomplish the required flight time. During training, proficiency, 

and experience-building flights the PIC is required to operate the UA with appropriate distances in 

accordance with 14 C.F.R 91.119. Exemption No. 11138 at page 15.

Accordingly, Steven Roote will ensure safe operations by not allowing any PIC to operate the DJI 

Phantom 2 Vision Plus UAS unless that PIC has demonstrated, by meeting minimum flight-hour 

and currency requirements, that the PIC is able to safely operate the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus

UAS in a manner consistent with the exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and

maintaining appropriate distances from people, vessels, vehicles and structures.

3. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.7(a) Would Not 

Adversely Affect Safety.

The equivalent level of safety established by Section 91.7(a) will be maintained because prior to 

every flight, Steven Roote will ensure that the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UAS is in an airworthy 

condition based upon the UAS’s compliance with its operating documents and as stated in the 
26

conditions and limitations herein. Additionally, the FAA has previously granted relief from Section 

91.7(a) specific to UAS, in circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein 

(e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 

11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).

4. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.121 Would Not 

Adversely Affect Safety.

The equivalent level of safety established by Section 91.121 will be maintained because the altitude 

information of the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UAs will be provided to the PIC via GPS 

equipment and a radio communications telemetry data link, which downlinks from the UA to the 

GCS for active monitoring of the flight path and altitude. This altitude information, combined with 

Steven Roote's operation of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UAs within visual line of sight, at or 

below 400 feet AGL, will ensure a level of safety equivalent to Section 91.121. The altitude 

information will be generated by GPS equipment installed onboard the aircraft. Prior to each flight, 

a zero altitude initiation point is automatically established by the UASs at ground level.

The FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.121 specific to UAS, in circumstances 

similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062, 11063, 11064, 

11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 

11159, 11160, 11161).

5. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Section 91.151(b) Would Not 

Adversely Affect Safety.

A grant of this exemption would ensure an equivalent level of safety established by 14 C.F.R. 

Section 91.151(b) as a result of (1) the technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision 

PlusUASs; (2) the limitations on the proposed flight operations; and (3) the location of the proposed 

flight operations. Accordingly, Steven Roote will ensure that it will safely operate the battery 
27

powered DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UAs during daylight hours in VFR conditions, with enough 

battery power to fly for a total duration of 13.5 minutes to the first point of intended landing and, 

assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 4.5 minutes.

Here, as in Exemption No. 11109, the technical specifications of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus

UASs; the limitations on the proposed flight operations; and the location of the proposed 

operations, will ensure an equivalent level of safety established by 14 C.F.R. Section 91.151(b). 

Furthermore, safety will be ensured as the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs provide audible and 

visual warnings to the PIC at the GCS when the UAs experiences low battery voltage, the first 

warning occurring at approximately 33% remaining battery power, and again at approximately 10% 

remaining battery power. At the critically low battery level, the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UASs 

will descend and land automatically.

Significantly, previous exemptions granted by the FAA concerning Section 91.151 establish that 

safety is not adversely affected when the technical characteristics and operating limitations of the 

UAS are considered. Relief has been granted for manned aircraft to operate at less than the 

minimums prescribed in Section 91.151, including Exemption Nos. 2689, 5745, and 10650. 

Moreover, the FAA has previously granted relief from Section 91.151 specific to UAS, in 

circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 8811, 

10808, 10673, 11042, 11062, 11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11136, 

11138, 11150, 11153, 11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).

6. Reasons Why An Exemption From The Requirements Of Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 

91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), And 91.417(a) & (b) Would Not Adversely Affect Safety.

In seeking this exemption, Steven Roote submits that the equivalent level of safety with regard to 

the regulatory maintenance and alteration requirements established by Sections 91.405(a), 

91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) will be met because Steven Roote will use 
28

trained technicians to perform maintenance, alterations, or preventive maintenance on the UASs 

using the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed in the operating documents (i.e., the Steven 

Roote Aerial Operations Manual, Monthly Maintenance Log, and DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus

Instruction Manual). Furthermore, Steven Roote will document and maintain all maintenance 

records for the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs.

Since the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs will be inspected as prescribed by the operating 

documents, Steven Roote will maintain the equivalent level of safety established by Sections 

91.405(a), 91.409(a)(1), and 91.409(a)(2). A copy of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus User Manual is 

attached hereto as Exhibit B; a copy of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UAS Maintenance LOG is 

attached hereto as Exhibit C.

Likewise, the exemption sought will not adversely affect safety because Steven Roote will use trained 

technicians to perform maintenance, alterations or preventive maintenance on the UAS using the 

methods, techniques, and practices prescribed by the operating documents.

Furthermore, the exemption sought would maintain an equivalent level of safety established by 

Sections 91.407, 91.417(a) and 91.417(b), because all maintenance of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus

UASs will be performed by trained technicians. Maintenance will be documented and maintained 

utilizing the monthly maintenance log.

Significantly, previous exemptions granted by the FAA concerning Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 

91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) establish that safety is not adversely affected when the 

technical characteristics and operating limitations of the UAS are considered.

In consideration of Steven Roote's proposed operating limitations, the operating documents, and the 

technical aspects of the DJI Phantom 3 Professional UASs, Steven Roote submits that safety will 

not be adversely affected by granting exemption from 14 C.F.R. Sections 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1) and 
29

(a)(2), 91.409(a)(2), and 91.417(a) and (b). The FAA has previously granted relief specific to UAS in 

circumstances similar, in all material respects, to those presented herein (e.g. Exemption Nos. 11062,

11063, 11064, 11065, 11066, 11067, 11080, 11109, 11110, 11112, 11136, 11138, 11150, 11153, 

11156, 11157, 11158, 11159, 11160, 11161).

7. The FAA May Prescribe Any Other Conditions For Safe Operation.

In accordance with Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) and 14 

C.F.R. § 21.16 entitled Special Conditions, Steven Roote requests that the FAA prescribe special 

conditions for the intended operation of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs, which contain such 

safety standards that the Administrator finds necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that 

established by 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H, and 14 C.F.R §§ 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7 (a), 91.121,

91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b). Such special conditions 

will permit safe operation of the UAs for the limited purpose of conducting aerial video and 

photography over certain areas of the United States for compensation or hire. FMRA Section 333 

sets forth the requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a hazard to users of the NAS 

or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security; and further, provides the authority for 

such UAS to operate without airworthiness certification in accordance with any requirements that 

must be established for the safe operation of the UAS in the NAS.

Likewise, the Administrator may prescribe special conditions pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 21.16, for 

operation of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs, since the airworthiness regulations of 14 C.F.R. 

Part 21 do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards, due to the novel or unusual design 

features of the aircraft. Section 21.16, entitled Special Conditions, states the following:

If the FAA finds that the airworthiness regulations of this subchapter do not contain adequate or 

appropriate safety standards for an aircraft, aircraft engine, or propeller because of a novel or 
30

unusual design feature of the aircraft, aircraft engine or propeller, he prescribes special conditions 

and amendments thereto for the product.

The special conditions are issued in accordance with Part 11 of this chapter and contain such safety 

standards for the aircraft, aircraft engine or propeller as the FAA finds necessary to establish a level 

of safety equivalent to that established in the regulations. See 14 C.F.R. § 21.16.

Therefore, in accordance with FMRA Section 333 and 14 C.F.R. § 21.16, the FAA may prescribe 

special conditions for Steven Roote’s intended operation of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs, 

which contain such safety standards that the Administrator finds necessary to establish a level of 

safety equivalent to that established by 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H, and 14 C.F.R Sections 

61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 

91.417(a) & (b).

F. A Summary That Can Be Published In The Federal Register, stating: The Rules From 

Which Steven Roote Seeks Exemption:

Steven Roote seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R Sections 61.113(a)&(b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 

91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b).

A Brief Description Of The Nature Of The Exemption Steven Roote Seeks:

This exemption will permit Steven Roote to commercially operate an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) for the 

purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of the United States.

G. Any Additional Information, Views, Or Arguments Available To Support Steven Roote's 

Request.

This Petition is made pursuant to the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA) Section 

333, which directs the Secretary of Transportation to determine if certain UAS may operate safely in 

the NAS. As such, Steven Roote's request for exemption may be granted pursuant to the authority 

of FMRA Section 333 and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, as set forth above.
31

FMRA Section 333 sets forth the requirements for considering whether a UAS will create a hazard 

to users of the NAS or the public, or otherwise pose a threat to national security; and further, 

provides the authority for such UAS to operate without airworthiness certification.

As discussed in detail above, Steven Roote will operate the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs safely 

in the NAS, without creating a hazard to users of the NAS, or the public, or otherwise pose a threat 

to national security.

CONCLUSION

As set forth herein, Steven Roote seeks an exemption pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 11.61 and Section 333 

of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), which will permit safe operation of 

the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs commercially, without an airworthiness certificate, for the 

limited purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of the United States. 

By granting this Petition, the FAA Administrator will be fulfilling the Congressional mandate of the 

FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, while also advancing the interests of the public, by 

allowing Steven Roote to safely, efficiently, and economically operate the DJI Phantom 2 Vision 

Plus UASs commercially within the NAS.

WHEREFORE, in accordance with the Federal Aviation Regulations and the FAA Modernization 

and Reform Act of 2012, Section 333, Steven Roote respectfully requests that the Administrator 

grant this Petition for an exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R Sections 61.113(a) & (b), 

91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b), and 

permit Steven Roote to operate the DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus UASs commercially for the purpose 

of conducting aerial video and photography over certain areas of the United States.

Dated: May 26, 2015 Respectfully submitted,

Steven Roote

840 State Street

Boyne City, MI 49712

Email: ourgreenhorizons@gmail.com
32

Appendices:

A – DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus Specifications Data Sheet

B – DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus Manufacturer’s User Manual Link

C – Monthly Maintenance Log
33

APPENDIX – A

DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS

Steven Roote only utilizes safe and reliable UASs. DJI is an industry leader in small UAS production. 

DJI UASs are loaded with ground breaking software enabling the user to set parameters which will 

not allow flight into controlled airspace. Parameters can also be set to limit flight to no higher than a 

predetermined and set altitude as well as limit flight to a predetermined and set distance. In addition, 

DJI software provides real-time altitude and location information to the PIC via the linked monitor 

(smart phone/tablet devices)

1.1 DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus

1.1.1 Aircraft

1.1.1.1 Supported Battery – DJI 4480mAH LiPo Battery

1.1.1.2 Weight (Battery & Propellers Included) – 2lbs 12oz 1280g

1.1.1.3 Hover Accuracy (Ready to Fly) – Vertical: 0.1m; Horizontal: 1m

1.1.1.4 Max Flight time - Approximately 23 minutes

1.1.1.5 Max Tilt Angel - 350

1.1.1.6 Max Ascent Speed – 5m/s

1.1.1.7 Max Descent Speed – 3m/s

1.1.1.8 Max Flight Speed – 16m/s (NOT RECOMMENDED)

1.1.1.9 Operating Temperature - 0oC - 40oC

1.1.1.10 Max Flight Altitude - 6000m

1.1.1.11 GPS Mode - GPS/GLONASS

1.1.2 Gimbal

1.1.2.1 Controllable Range – Pitch: -900 +300

1.1.3 Camera

1.1.3.1 Sensor - Sony EXMOR 1/2.3"

1.1.3.2 Lens - FOV 94o 20mm (35mm format equivalent) f/2.8

1.1.3.3 Effective Pixels – 12.4M

1.1.3.4 Resolution – 4384x3288

4.1.3.5 HD Video Recording – 4K, 1080p & 720p

4.1.3.6 Image Max Size - 4000 x 3000

1.1.4 Remote Controller

1.1.4.1 Operating Frequency – 2.400GHz – 2.483GHz

1.1.4.2 Communication Distance (unobstructed) - 2000m

1.1.4.3 Battery - 6000 mAh LiPo 2s

1.1.4.4 Transmitter Power – FCC: 20dbm CE: 16 dbm

1.1.4.5 Working Voltage – 1.2 A @7.4 V

APPENDIX – B

DJI Phantom 2 Vision Plus Manufacturer’s User Manual is too large to submit, however a link to 

this information is: 

http://download.djiinnovations.com/downloads/phantom_2/en/PHANTOM2_User_Manual_v1.4_en.pdf
34

APPENDIX – C

Maintenance Log: Date:___________________

UAS # Date Issue 

Discovered

Date Issue 

Addressed Issue Description Peron Competed