From: Graydon, Amy [ mailto:Amy.Graydon@HQ.DHS.GOV ]

Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 9:42 AM To: Jones, Danielle < Danielle_Y_Jones@omb.eop.gov >; Morrison, Stephanie

< Stephanie_A_Morrison@nsc.eop.gov >; Ekechi, Chinyere < Chinyere_O_Ekechi@ceq.eop.gov >; Joyce, Shannon < Shannon_M_Joyce@omb.eop.gov >; King, Heather < Heather_C_King@nsc.eop.gov >; MacMaster, Ryan J. < Ryan_J._MacMaster@omb.eop.gov >; McConville, Drew

< Andrew_J_McConville@ceq.eop.gov >; Monteiro, Claire < Claire_E_Monteiro@omb.eop.gov >; Olinsky, Ben < Benjamin_C_Olinsky@who.eop.gov >; Bruce_D_Rodan@ostp.eop.gov ; Barringer, Jody M.

< Jody_M._Barringer@omb.eop.gov >; Giljohann, Catherine < Catherine_M_Giljohann@ceq.eop.gov >; Jennings, Kim < Jennings.Kim@epa.g ov >; Brooks, Becky < Brooks.Becky@epa.gov >; Rollins, Marsha

< marsha.rollins@hq.dhs.gov >; Curylo, Amanda < amanda.cury lo@hq.dhs.gov >; Del Rosario, Britney (CTR) < britney.delrosario@associates.hq.dhs.gov >; Stanislaus, Mathy < Stanislaus.Mathy@epa.gov >; Natarajan, Nitin < Natarajan.Nitin@epa.gov >; Breen, Barry < Breen.Barry@epa.gov >; Cheatham, Reggie

< cheatham.reggie@epa.gov >; Coglia no, Gerain < Cogliano.Gerain@epa.gov >; Durkovich, Caitlin

< Caitlin.Durkovich@HQ.DHS.GOV >; Wulf, David < David.Wulf @hq.dhs.gov >; Matthiessen, Craig

< Matthiessen.Craig@epa.gov >; 'David.Centofante@ic.fbi.gov' < David.Centofante@ic.fbi.gov >; Franklin, Kathy < Franklin.Kathy@epa.gov >; Kolasky, Robert < robert.kolasky@hq.dhs.gov >; Silberman, Jon

< Silberman.Jon@epa.gov >; Long, Lisa

- OSHA < Long.Lisa@dol.gov >; Vassalo, Peter

- SOL

< vassalo.peter@dol.gov >; Hindin, David < Hindin.David@epa.gov >; Graydon, Amy

< Amy.Graydon@HQ.DHS.GOV > Subject: RE: Summary from the RMP Interagency Meeting

Attachment:



### Danielle,
Thank you very much for the summary. DHS would like to propose a clarification to the one bullet:

 EPA wi ll work with DHS and other interested interagency reviewers representatives to develop solutions or potential options regarding the public disclosure public comments, prior to the final rule review by the interagency . EPA will also provide a rough timelin e to the group. 

### Please let us know if the clarification is acceptable.
Amy Graydon Chief, Policy and Rulemaking Branch Infrastructure Security Compliance Division Office of Infrastructure Protection
Amy.Graydon@hq.dhs.gov Desk: 703

- 603

- 4662From: Jones, Danielle [ mailto:Danielle_Y_Jones@omb.eop.gov ]

Sent: Tuesday, February 9, 2016 5:20 PM To: Morrison, Stephanie < Stephanie_A_Morrison@nsc.eop.gov >; Ekechi, Chinyere

< Chinyere_O_Ekechi@ceq.eop.gov >; Joyce, Shannon < Shannon_M_Joyce@omb.eop.gov >; King, Heather < Heather_C_King@nsc.eop.gov >; MacMaster, Ryan J. < Ryan_J._MacMaster@omb.eop.gov >; McConville, Drew < Andrew_J_McConville@ceq.eop.gov >; Monteiro, Claire

< Claire_E_Monteiro@omb.eop.gov >; Olinsky, Ben < Benjamin_C_Olinsky@who.eop.gov >; Rodan, Bruce

< Bruce_D_Rodan@ostp.eop.gov >; Barringer, Jody M. < Jody_M._Barringer@omb.eop.gov >; Giljohann, Catherine < Catherine_M_Giljohann@ceq.eop.gov >; Jennings, Kim < Jennings.Kim@epa.gov >; Brooks, Becky < Brooks.Becky@epa.gov >; Gr aydon, Amy < Amy.Graydon@HQ.DHS.GOV >; Rollins, Marsha

< marsha.rollins@hq.dhs.gov >; Curylo, Amanda < amanda.curylo@h q.dhs.gov >; Del Rosario, Britney (CTR) < britney.delrosario@associates.hq.dhs.gov >; 'Stanislaus.mathy@epa.gov'

< Stanislaus.mathy@epa.gov >; Natarajan, Nitin < natarajan.nitin@epa.gov >; breen.barry@epa.gov ; 'Cheatham.reggie@epa.gov' < Cheatham.reggie@epa.gov >; C ogliano, Gerain ( Cogliano.Gerain@epa.gov )

< Cogliano.Gerain@epa.gov >; Durkovich, Caitlin < Caitlin.Durkovich@HQ. DHS.GOV >; Wulf, David

< David.Wulf@hq.dhs.gov >; Matthiessen, Craig < Matthiessen.Craig@epa.gov >; 'David.Centofante@ic.fbi.gov' < David.Centofante@ic.fbi.gov >; Franklin, Kathy

< Franklin.Kathy@epa.gov >; Kolasky, Robert < robert.kolasky@hq.dhs.gov >; Silberman, Jon

< Silberman.Jon@epa.gov >; Long, Lisa

- OSHA < Long.Lisa@dol.gov >; Vassalo, Peter

- SOL

< vassalo.peter@dol.gov >; Hindin, David < Hindin.David@epa.gov > Subject: Summary from the RMP Interagency Meeting

Colleagues,

Please find attached my brief summary from the RMP Interagency Meeting that took place on January 29. Please let me know if there is somethi ng that I missed including.

Best, Danielle

Danielle Y. Jones Policy Analyst Office of Management and Budget Phone: (202) 395

- 1741 | djones@omb.eop.govAttachment: RMP Interagency Meeting S u mmary v1.docx

RMP Interagency Meeting Summary January 29, 2016

 EPA will remove the chemical quantities req uirement from public disclosure, however, the EPA believes that the chemical name and SDS should be made available to the public.

 For after action reports, EPA will take public comment on the level of information provided in the reports.

 EPA will be seeking public comment on the three remaining items (chemical name, SDS, and LEPC contact information) under public disclosure.

 EPA will work with DHS and other inte rested interagency representatives to develop solutions or potential options regarding the public disclosure public comments, prior to the final rule review by the interagency

. EPA will also provide a rough timeline to the group.

 There is conc ern with the term feasibility, which is a unique concept under OHA and there is concern that there might be confusion. EPA agreed to seek comment on feasibility vs. practical.

 EPA stated that they would not be accepting SAA reports, in part due to lack of

resources.

 EPA’s rationale for excluding waste water treatment plants is that this sector has the lowest level of incidences. The wastewater treatment facilities has the highest rate of implementing IST out of the various NACIS codes.

 The third party audi ts is being resolved in the SBAR Panel process, with request for public comments.