alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsIntegrating automated support for a software management cycle into the TAME systemSoftware managers are interested in the quantitative management of software quality, cost and progress. An integrated software management methodology, which can be applied throughout the software life cycle for any number purposes, is required. The TAME (Tailoring A Measurement Environment) methodology is based on the improvement paradigm and the goal/question/metric (GQM) paradigm. This methodology helps generate a software engineering process and measurement environment based on the project characteristics. The SQMAR (software quality measurement and assurance technology) is a software quality metric system and methodology applied to the development processes. It is based on the feed forward control principle. Quality target setting is carried out before the plan-do-check-action activities are performed. These methodologies are integrated to realize goal oriented measurement, process control and visual management. A metric setting procedure based on the GQM paradigm, a management system called the software management cycle (SMC), and its application to a case study based on NASA/SEL data are discussed. The expected effects of SMC are quality improvement, managerial cost reduction, accumulation and reuse of experience, and a highly visual management reporting system.Document ID19900012216Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsSunazuka, Toshihiko*(Nippon Electric Co. Ltd. Tokyo, Japan)*Basili, Victor R.*(Maryland Univ. College Park, MD, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1989Subject CategoryComputer Programming And SoftwareReport/Patent NumberUMIACS-TR-89-75NAS 1.26:186457CS-TR-2289NASA-CR-186457Accession Number90N21532Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NSG-5123Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900012216.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)

I, Randolph Gress, certify that:

1. the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Innophos, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided Innophos, Inc. and will be retained by Innophos, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.

Date: November 4, 2009



/s/ RANDOLPH GRESSRandolph Gress Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to the
requirements of 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as a part of the Report.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2151 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize individuals who are 

pursuing programs of rehabilitation, education, or training under laws 

administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to receive work-study 

allowances for certain outreach services provided through congressional 

offices, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 23, 2013 

Mr. DEFAZIO (for himself, Mr. MICHAUD, and Mr. TAKANO) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize individuals who are pursuing programs of rehabilitation, education, or training under laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to receive work-study allowances for certain outreach services provided through congressional offices, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2151 IH

1 SECTION 1. EXPANSION OF WORK-STUDY ALLOWANCE TO 

2 INCLUDE CERTAIN OUTREACH SERVICES 

3 CONDUCTED THROUGH CONGRESSIONAL OF4 FICES. 

5 Section 3485(a)(4) of title 38, United States Code, 

6 is amended by adding at the end the following new sub7 paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(K) The following activities carried out at the 

9 offices of Members of Congress for such Members: 

10 ‘‘(i) The distribution of information to 

11 members of the Armed Forces, veterans, and 

12 their dependents about the benefits and services 

13 under laws administered by the Secretary and 

14 other appropriate governmental and non-gov15 ernmental programs. 

16 ‘‘(ii) The preparation and processing of pa17 pers and other documents, including documents 

18 to assist in the preparation and presentation of 

19 claims for benefits under laws administered by 

20 the Secretary.’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                   5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Partnership's audited financial statements for the year ended March 31, 1998 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                       MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                  6,202
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                             247
<ALLOWANCES>                               11
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        6,867
<PP&E>                                 78,204
<DEPRECIATION>                         14,044
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         72,274
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     653
<BONDS>                                21,540
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                             49,750
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           72,274
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        6,215
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           4,517
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      1,961
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (263)
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (263)
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                            (263)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          (1.94)
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (1.94)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 29.3601 Rules.

The application of §§ 29.3501 to 29.3568, § 29.3591, §§ 29.3646 to 29.3648, §§ 29.3650 to 29.3652 and 29.3681 shall be in accordance with the following rules.

[51 FR 40408, Nov. 7, 1986]
#### New England Mutual Life Insurance Company, appellee, v. John W. Keogh et al., appellants.

Gen. No. 37,084.

Opinion filed October 24, 1934.

Rehearing denied November 15, 1934.

John W. Keogh, *pro se.*Judah, Reichmann, Trumbull & Cox, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Hall

delivered the opinion of the court.
**EXHIBIT 31.1****Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**I, David Shaw, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Standard Aero Holdings, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present inall material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by the reportbased on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.Dated:November 14, 2005   /s/ David Shaw     David Shaw  Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. Case No. 3:97cr51/LAC

SHERYL ANN LONERGAN
/

ORDER TERMINATING CONDITIONAL RELEASE

On December 23, 1997, Sheryl Ann Lonergan was sentenced to a period
of conditional release by this Court. On July 22, 2009, a motion to determine
whether Ms. Lonergan’s conditional release could be terminated or modified
was filed by defense counsel, Assistant Federal Public Defender Thomas
Keith. In consideration of this motion, the Court reviewed the
recommendation of the United States Probation Office with input from the
United States Attorney’s Office. Accordingly, it has been determined that
Shery! Ann Lonergan has complied with the rules and regulations of
conditional release and is no longer in need of supervision. Therefore, it is
ordered that she be discharged from conditional release.

DONE AND ORDERED this 18" day of August, 2006.

\Orle eer

LACEY A. COLLIER
SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

UG ALS 18 pau

WEL ee
Non-Employee Director Compensation Arrangement




 Exhibit 10.16 
  
 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENT 
  
 Upon appointment or election to the Board of Directors, each non-employee director who is not affiliated with Warburg, Pincus Ventures, L.P. (“Warburg”), our
largest stockholder, receives options to purchase 20,000 shares of our common stock under the terms of one of our equity incentive plans then in effect with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date of the
grant. Such options to purchase shares of our common stock vest 20% on the date of grant and 20% on each anniversary of the date of grant. 
  
 Each non-employee director who is not affiliated with Warburg selects to receive either (i) annual director fees of $24,000 payable in quarterly installments of $6,000 or
(ii) an option to purchase shares of our common stock, granted on or about the date of each annual meeting of stockholders, equivalent to a payment of $24,000 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model as of the date of the grant. Such options are
awarded under the terms of one of our equity incentive plans then in effect with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date of the grant. Such options to purchase shares of our common stock vest 100% on the date
of the grant. 
  
 Each non-employee director that is not affiliated with Warburg
receives a meeting fee of $500.00. In addition, each non-employee director who also serves as a committee chairman receives an additional $500.00 for each committee meeting held outside a regular meeting of the Board of Directors. No compensation is
paid for executing a unanimous consent of directors. 
  
 Warburg receives one
allocation of each of the aforementioned option grants and one allocation of meeting fees for the ultimate benefit of Warburg. 
  
 Non-employee directors are reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses incurred to attend Board of Directors and committee meetings.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2299 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2299

 To prevent the Secretary of the Treasury from expanding United States 
 bank reporting requirements with respect to interest on deposits paid 
                         to nonresident aliens.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 6, 2013

  Mr. Posey (for himself, Mr. Hinojosa, Mr. Marchant, and Mr. Garcia) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prevent the Secretary of the Treasury from expanding United States 
 bank reporting requirements with respect to interest on deposits paid 
                         to nonresident aliens.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON TREASURY REGULATIONS WITH RESPECT TO 
              INFORMATION REPORTING ON CERTAIN INTEREST PAID TO 
              NONRESIDENT ALIENS.

    Except to the extent provided in Treasury Regulations as in effect 
on February 21, 2011, the Secretary of the Treasury shall not require 
(by regulation or otherwise) that an information return be made by a 
payor of interest in the case of interest--
            (1) which is described in section 871(i)(2)(A) of the 
        Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and
            (2) which is paid--
                    (A) to a nonresident alien, and
                    (B) on a deposit maintained at an office within the 
                United States.
                                 <all>
```
CANTERBURY INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC. -- 10K 1997
                                      
                                  EXHIBIT
                                      
                            LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
                OF CANTERBURY INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC. 
                                      

Canterbury Career Schools, Inc. (inactive)
Canterbury Career Schools of Sacramento, Inc. (inactive)
Canterbury Career Schools of Pittsburgh, Inc. (inactive)
Canterbury Management Group, Inc. 
Scholastic Partners, Inc. (inactive)
Star Label Products, Inc. (shell)
Clark Training Corp. (inactive)
MSI/Canterbury Corp. 
Empire Career Center, Inc. (inactive)
Canterbury Career Schools of Lauderdale (inactive)
CALC/Canterbury Corp. 
Prosoft/Canterbury Corp. 
Nevada Training Corp. (inactive)
Vocational Education Corp. d/b/a American Trucking Academy (inactive)
ATM/Canterbury Corp.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.38

  Compensation of Directors of Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation

Effective as of January 28, 2005, the annual compensation payable to
non-employee directors of Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation (the
"Company") is as set forth below.

Directors will receive a grant of 7,500 options each year, with the chairman
receiving 10,000 options. Directors will also receive an annual retainer of
$40,000, payable in one of four ways, at their election: (1) in cash, (2) one
half in cash and one half in restricted stock, (3) in restricted stock, or (4)
in the form of options (the number of options determined by valuing the options
at 25% of the fair market value of the Company's common stock underlying the
option), with a maximum of 5,000 options.

Cash payments will be paid in arrears on a quarterly basis. Options and
restricted stock will be granted on the date of the annual meeting of
stockholders at which directors are elected.

Options and restricted stock will fully vest six months after the grant date.
The exercise price of options granted will be the fair market of the Company's
common stock on the grant date, and restricted stock will be valued based on the
fair market value of the Company's common stock on the date of the grant.

The Company will pay reasonable travel and out-of-pocket expenses incurred by
non-employee directors in connection with attendance at meetings to transact
business of the Company or attendance at meetings of the Board of Directors or
any committee thereof.

                                     Page 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:99cr46/RV

WILLIE JAMES GRIFFIN JR.

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Senior Judge Roger Vinson on October 12, 2006 

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION for modification of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2)

Filed by Defendant on 911/2006 Doc.# 303

RESPONSES:

 None on Doc.# 

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

 Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

 s/Jerry Marbut

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Jerry Marbut

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 17th day of

 October , 2006, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) 

 /s/ Roger Vinson

ROGER VINSON

Senior United States District Judge

Case 3:99-cr-00046-RV-EMT Document 304 Filed 10/17/06 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                           SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY


CIM Trucking, Inc., an Illinois corporation
Mac Leod Metals Co., a California corporation
Metal Management Aerospace, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Metal Management Alabama, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Metal Management Arizona, L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company
Metal Management Connecticut, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Metal Management Gulf Coast, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Metal Management Indiana, Inc., an Illinois corporation
Metal Management Memphis, L.L.C., a Tennessee limited liability company
Metal Management Midwest, Inc., an Illinois corporation
Metal Management Mississippi, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company
Metal Management New Haven, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Metal Management Northeast, Inc., a New Jersey corporation
Metal Management Ohio, Inc., a Ohio corporation
Metal Management Pittsburgh, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Metal Management S&A Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Metal Management Stainless & Alloy, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Metal Management West, Inc., a Colorado corporation
Metal Management West Coast Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation
MTLM Arizona, Inc., an Arizona corporation
Naporano Iron & Metal, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Proler Southwest Inc., a Texas corporation
Reserve Iron & Metal Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership


Metal Management Nashville, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (ownership
  of 50%)
Port Albany Ventures LLC., a Delaware limited liability company (ownership of
  50%)
Rondout Iron & Metal, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (ownership of
  50%)
Southern Recycling, LLC, a Louisiana limited liability company (ownership of
  28.5% interest)
**Exhibit 32**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

** **

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofStone Arcade Acquisition Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Roger Stone, Chief ExecutiveOfficer (Principal Executive and Financial Officer) of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periodcertified.

 

Pursuant to the rules and regulations ofthe Securities and Exchange Commission, this certification is being furnishedand is not deemed filed.

 

Signed on this 12th day of May,2006.

 
|   | /s/ Roger Stone |   |
|--------|-----------------|--------|
|   | Roger Stone     |

 

----