alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Frank P. Filipps, certify that:

1.    Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Clayton Holdings,Inc.;

2.    Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.    Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

(b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SECtransition instructions contained in SEC Release No. 34-47986];

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

5.    Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
| Date: August 8, 2007 |                      |   |
|---------------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|                      | /s/ Frank P. Filipps      |   |
|                      | Frank P. Filipps          |   |
|                      | *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
#### § 28.481 Alternate title for standards.

Since these standards have been agreed upon and accepted by the leading European cotton associations and exchanges, they may also be termed and referred to as the “Universal Standards for American Cotton.”

[24 FR 5171, June 25, 1959]
#### The State of Ohio, Appellant, *v.*Delgado, Appellee.

[Cite as *State v. Delgado*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 434.]

(No. 98-982

Submitted August 19, 1998

Decided October 28, 1998.)

*Stephanie Tubbs Jones,*Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and *L. Christopher Frey,*Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.

The discretionary appeal is allowed.

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of *State v. Rush*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 53, 697 N.E.2d 634. .

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

KIMBERLY MARGARET CONEY,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:20-cv-72-AW-GRJ

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting 

Commissioner of the Social Security 

Administration,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

I have carefully considered the magistrate judge’s August 18, 2021 Report 

and Recommendation, ECF No. 18, to which no objections have been filed. I now 

conclude that the Report and Recommendation should be approved, and it is adopted 

and incorporated by reference into this order. The clerk will enter a judgment that 

states “The decision of the Commissioner is reversed, and the case is remanded 

under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for a determination of Plaintiff’s disability 

eligibility based on the total record, including the new evidence.” The clerk will then 

close the file.

SO ORDERED on September 28, 2021.

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-00072-AW-GRJ Document 19 Filed 09/28/21 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Barge Line Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Christopher A. Black, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations ofthe Company.     /s/ Christopher A. Black   August 11, 2005 Christopher A. Black  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2337 

AN ACT 

To provide for the conveyance of the Forest Service Lake 

Hill Administrative Site in Summit County, Colorado. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2337 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lake Hill Administra3 tive Site Affordable Housing Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

5 In this Act: 

6 (1) COUNTY.—The term ‘‘County’’ means Sum7 mit County, Colorado. 

8 (2) LAKE HILL ADMINISTRATIVE SITE.—The 

9 term ‘‘Lake Hill Administrative Site’’ means the 

10 parcel of approximately 40 acres of National Forest 

11 System land in the County, as depicted on the map 

12 entitled ‘‘Lake Hill Administrative Site’’ and dated 

13 June 2012. 

14 (3) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

15 the Secretary of Agriculture. 

16 SEC. 3. CONVEYANCE OF FOREST SERVICE LAKE HILL AD17 MINISTRATIVE SITE, SUMMIT COUNTY, COLO18 RADO. 

19 (a) CONVEYANCE AUTHORITY.—Upon receipt of an 

20 offer from the County in which the County agrees to the 

21 condition imposed by subsection (c), the Secretary shall 

22 use the authority provided by the Forest Service Facility 

23 Realignment and Enhancement Act of 2005 (Public Law 

24 109–54; 16 U.S.C. 580d note) to convey to the County 

25 all right, title, and interest of the United States in and 

26 to the Forest Service Lake Hill Administrative Site. 
3 

•HR 2337 EH

1 (b) APPLICATION OF LAW.— 

2 (1) TREATMENT AS ADMINISTRATIVE SITE.— 

3 The Lake Hill Administrative Site is considered to 

4 be an administrative site under section 502(1)(A) of 

5 the Forest Service Facility Realignment and En6 hancement Act of 2005 (Public Law 109–54; 16 

7 U.S.C. 580d note). 

8 (2) EXCEPTION.—Section 502(1)(C) of that 

9 Act does not apply to the conveyance of the Lake 

10 Hill Administrative Site. 

11 (c) COSTS.—The County shall be responsible for 

12 processing and transaction costs related to the direct sale 

13 under subsection (a). 

14 (d) PROCEEDS.—Proceeds received from the convey15 ance pursuant to subsection (a) shall be available, without 

16 further appropriation and until expended, for capital im17 provement and maintenance of Forest Service facilities in 

18 Region 2 of the United States Forest Service. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 29, 

2013. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2337 

AN ACT 

To provide for the conveyance of the Forest Service 

Colorado. Lake Hill Administrative Site in Summit County,
§ 205.404 Granting certification. ( a ) Within a reasonable time after completion of the initial on-site inspection, a certifying agent must review the on-site inspection report, the results of any analyses for substances conducted, and any additional information requested from or supplied by the applicant. If the certifying agent determines that the organic system plan and all procedures and activities of the applicant's operation are in compliance with the requirements of this part and that the applicant is able to conduct operations in accordance with the plan, the agent shall grant certification. The certification may include requirements for the correction of minor noncompliances within a specified time period as a condition of continued certification.
( b ) The certifying agent must issue a certificate of organic operation. The certificate of organic operation must be generated from the Organic Integrity Database and may be provided to certified operations electronically.
( c ) In addition to the certificate of organic operation provided for in paragraph (b) of this section, a certifying agent may issue its own addenda to the certificate of organic operation. If issued, any addenda must include: ( 1 ) Name, address, and contact information for the certified operation;
( 2 ) The certified operation's unique ID number/code that corresponds to the certified operation's ID number/code in the Organic Integrity Database;
( 3 ) A link to the Organic Integrity Database or a link to the certified operation's profile in the Organic Integrity Database, along with a statement, “You may verify the certification of this operation at the Organic Integrity Database,” or a similar statement;
( 4 ) Name, address, and contact information of the certifying agent; and
( 5 ) “Addendum issue date.”
( d ) Once certified, a production or handling operation's organic certification continues in effect until surrendered by the organic operation or suspended or revoked by the certifying agent, the State organic program's governing State official, or the Administrator.
[65 FR 80637, Dec. 21, 2000, as amended of 88 FR 3623, Jan. 19, 2023]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:97CR17/RV

SHAWN LAKIEA GETTIS

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Senior Judge Roger Vinson on March 9, 2009 

Motion/Pleadings: Motion to Reduce Sentence and Supplemental Motion to Reduce Sentence

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (c)(2) 

Filed by Defendant on 3/12/2008 and

3/02/2009 

 Doc.# 35 and 41

RESPONSES:

 United States on 3/19/2008 Doc.# 37

 United States on 3/06/2009 Doc.# 42/43

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

 Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

 s/Jerry Marbut

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Jerry Marbut

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 18th day of 

 June , 2009, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) See separate order. (AO247) 

 /s/ Roger Vinson

ROGER VINSON

Senior United States District Judge

Case 3:97-cr-00017-RV Document 45 Filed 06/18/09 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Metal Management, Inc. (the
"Corporation") for the year ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the
Vice-Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation,
certifies that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.



  /s/ Albert A. Cozzi
--------------------------------------------
Albert A. Cozzi
Vice-Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
June 2, 2003

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Corporation and will be retained by the Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2351 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2351

To repeal the fossil fuel consumption percentage reduction requirements 
for Federal buildings under the Energy Conservation and Production Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 13, 2013

 Mr. Whitfield (for himself, Mr. McKinley, Mr. Enyart, and Mr. Rahall) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation 
 and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal the fossil fuel consumption percentage reduction requirements 
for Federal buildings under the Energy Conservation and Production Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF FOSSIL FUEL CONSUMPTION PERCENTAGE REDUCTION 
              REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL BUILDINGS.

    (a) Repeal.--Subclauses (I) and (II) of section 305(a)(3)(D)(i) of 
the Energy Conservation and Production Act (42 U.S.C. 6834(a)(3)(D)(i)) 
are repealed.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 305(a)(3)(D)(vi) of the Energy 
Conservation and Production Act is amended by striking ``subclauses (I) 
and (III) of clause (i)'' and inserting ``clause (i)''.
                                 <all>
```
## Draft Proposal CB-29

This concept has been developed by the DOE Building Energy Codes Program (BECP) as a possible code

change proposal to the Commercial provisions of the 2012 International Energy Conservation Code

(IECC). Interested parties are asked to submit any and all comments on DOE's initial concepts and draft

code change proposals. For instructions on submitting comments, visit:

www.energycodes.gov/development/ commercial/codes/iecc/concepts/



## Shutoff Damper Controls (CB-29)

Objective: Cover only the types of controls that are required for automatic dampers because other

damper requirements are covered elsewhere in the code.

Suggested Code Change Proposal

Revise Section C403.2.4.4 as follows:

C403.2.4.4 Shutoff damper controls. Both outdoor air supply and exhaust openings in HVAC

equipment and ducts shall be equipped with motorized damp ers that will automatically shut when the

systems or spaces served are not in use. Dampers shall meet the leakage requirements of Section

C402.4.5.

Exceptions : 1. Gravity dampers shall be permitted where permitted in Section C402.4.5. in buildings less

than three stories in height.

2. Gravity dampers shall be permitted for buildi ngs of any height located in Climate Zones 1, 2

and 3.

3. Gravity dampers shall be permitted for outside air intake or exhaust airflows of 300 cfm (0.14

m3/s) or less.

Reason: The provisions in Section C402.4.5 provide the necessary foundation for damper requirements

on openings in the building thermal envelope. Currently the exceptions in sections C402.4.5 and

Sections C403.2.4.4 do not match, even though they apply to the same damper conditions. All that

needs to be covered in the HVAC provisions of the code are requirements for automatic controls to shut

the dampers and a requirement of similar dampers in equipment and ducts. Referring to section

C402.4.5 ensures that requirements for shutoff dampers will be consistent.

Cost Impact: There is no cost impact associated with this proposed change.
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:96cr89 LAC

ALFRED JAMES HAYES

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on MARCH 28, 2008 

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION FOR REDUCTION OF SENTENCE PURSUANT TO TITLE 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) 

Filed by DEFENDANT PRO SE on3/26/08 Doc.# 46

RESPONSES:

on Doc.#

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Mary Maloy

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 5th day of

May, 2008, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) Defendant was released from his original sentence on 22 August 2003 to a

period of supervised release. He violated his supervised release with a Grade

A violation and coupled with a criminal history category VI, he was sentenced to

60 months incarceration which he is now serving. At his violation hearing, the

Court did not take into account his base offense level or drug weight as

determined at his original sentencing. Defendant, therefore, is not eligible for

a sentence reduction under Amendment 706. 

 s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 3:96-cr-00089-LC Document 47 Filed 05/05/08 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. CASE NO. 1:88-cr-01017-MP

UMBERTO MARUJA GUTIERREZ,

Defendant.

___________________________/

O R D E R 

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 205, Motion to Dismiss Indictment by United

States as to Umberto Maruja Gutierrez. In the motion, the government states that the interests of

justice would be served by dismissing the indictment because the Drug Enforcement

Administration has advised the government that even "if defendant were to be apprehended,

there is insufficient evidence, due to the age of the case and unavailability of witnesses, to

proceed to trial." Doc. 205. Accordingly, the indictment is hereby dismissed against Umberto

Maruja Gutierrez.

DONE AND ORDERED this 23rd day of December, 2005

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:88-cr-01017-MP Document 206 Filed 12/23/05 Page 1 of 1
exv10w24



 






Exhibit 10.24




AMENDMENT #3 TO SATELLITE SERVICE AGREEMENT




     THIS AMENDMENT #3 (“Amendment #3”) to the Satellite Service Agreement for AMC-16 effective as
of February 19, 2004, as amended by Amendment #1 effective as of March 10, 2004, and Amendment #2
effective as of April 30, 2004 (collectively the “Original Agreement”), between SES Americom, Inc.,
as agent for SES Americom California, Inc. (for the period prior to the In-Service Date) and SES
Americom Colorado, Inc. (for the period on and after the In-Service Date), on the one hand, and
EchoStar Satellite L.L.C., formerly known as EchoStar Satellite Corporation (“Customer”) *** is
made effective as of November 19, 2004 (the “Amendment #3 Effective Date”). All references to “SES
Americom” herein shall include SES Americom California, Inc., SES Americom Colorado, Inc., and SES
Americom, Inc. as agent for each. Defined terms used in this Amendment #3 have the meanings
specified herein or in the Original Agreement. The Original Agreement as amended by this Amendment
#3 is referred to as the “Agreement”.



     SES Americom and Customer agree to amend the Original Agreement in accordance with the terms
and conditions set forth below. ***


(4)    General. Except as expressly modified herein, the Original Agreement shall remain in
full force and effect in accordance with its terms and conditions.




     This Amendment #3 contains the complete and exclusive understanding of the parties with
respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior negotiations and agreements between
the parties with respect thereto.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	ECHOSTAR SATELLITE L.L.C.
 

By: EchoStar DBS Corporation, its

sole member	 	SES AMERICOM, INC., as agent for 

SES AMERICOM CALIFORNIA, INC. and

SES AMERICOM COLORADO, INC.
	 

	By:

	 	 	 	By:	 	 	 
	

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	(Signature)	 	(Signature)
	 
	 
	Name:

	 	 	 	Name:	 	 	 
	

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	(Typed or Printed Name)	 	(Typed or Printed Name)
	 
	 
	Title:

	 	 	 	Title:	 	 	 
	

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 








***




-1-



***Certain confidential portions of this exhibit were omitted by means of redacting a portion of the text. Copies of the exhibit containing the redacted portions have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission subject to a request for confidential treatment pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act.
Exhibit A

PID Plaintiff Name Active Docket Case

Number Motion ECF No. Order ECF No.

1. 293044 Atkinson, John 7:21‐cv‐13866‐MCR‐HTC 5 6

2. 220942 Blurton, Anthony 8:20‐cv‐64588‐MCR‐HTC 5 6

3. 305569 Cledoe, Kwami 7:21‐cv‐24638‐MCR‐HTC 8 9

4. 260683 Criss, Robert 9:20‐cv‐06610‐MCR‐HTC 5 6

5. 174226 Holder, Robert 7:20‐cv‐39541‐MCR‐HTC 5 6

6. 227116 Lemarr, David 8:20‐cv‐77754‐MCR‐HTC 5 6

7. 271100 Wojtowich, Josh 9:20‐cv‐14123‐MCR‐HTC 6 7

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3706-1 Filed 03/27/23 Page 1 of 1
§ 247.24 Recovery and redistribution of caseload and administrative funds. ( a ) *May FNS recover and redistribute caseload and administrative funds assigned to a State agency?* Yes. FNS may recover and redistribute caseload and administrative funds assigned to a State agency during the fiscal year. FNS will redistribute these resources to other State agencies in accordance with the provisions of §§ 247.21(a) and 247.22(b). In reassigning caseload, FNS will use the most up-to-date data on participation and the extent to which caseload is being utilized, as well as other information provided by State agencies. In accordance with § 247.21(a)(2), in instances in which FNS recovers caseload slots, the State agency must use 95 percent of its original caseload allocation to be eligible for additional caseload. However, the State agency must not exceed its reduced caseload allocation on an average monthly basis.
( b ) *Is there a limit on the amount of caseload slots or administrative funds that FNS may recover?* Yes. FNS will not unilaterally recover caseload that would result in the recovery of more than 50 percent of the State's administrative funds. However, in instances in which the State agency requests that FNS recover any portion of its assigned caseload, the 50-percent limitation will not apply.
#### James Robert Cotton, by Alva Cotton, his next friend, appellee, v. Esther Balsley, appellant.

Gen. No. 8,794.

Opinion filed October 10, 1934.

Meeks & Lowenstein and Rearick & Reariek, for appellant. J. R. Dean, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Fulton

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### § 29.2525 Greenish.

A term applied to greenish-tinged tobacco. Any leaf which has a greenish tinge or a pale green color affecting 20 percent or more of its surface may be described as greenish. (See Rule 17, § 29.2633.)