alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<SEQUENCE>4
<FILENAME>j10kex3.txt

                                                                    Exhibit 99.3




				Exhibit 99(i)

		 	   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
			       18 U.S.C. ss.1350
			    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
		 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of  Nutek, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the  iscal  year  ended  December  31,  2002  as  filed  with  the
Securities  and   Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  therein  specified   (the
"Report"),  I,  Murray N. Conradie, Chief  Executive  Officer  of  the  Company,
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted  pursuant to  Section  906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of  Section  13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report  fairly  presents, in  all
material respects, the financial condition and  results of  operations  of  the
Company.

                                     /s/ Murray N. Conradie
                                     ------------------------------------------

                                    MURRAY N. CONRADIE, Chief Executive Officer

Dated: March 28, 2003
#### LICHTENBERG v. HODZ.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

June 18, 1914.)

New Trial (§ 81*)—Right to Allow New Trial—Conflicting Evidence-Exceptions.

Where the evidence was conflicting, and that of plaintiff did not preponderate over defendant’s the trial court could not set aside a verdict for defendant and grant a new trial, where plaintiff reserved no exceptions to the admission of evidence or the charge, and offered no requests.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see New Trial, Cent. Dig. § 131; Dec. Dig. § 81.*]

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Bronx, Second District.

Action by Joseph Lichtenberg against Samuel Hodz. From an order setting aside a verdict in his favor, defendant appeals.

Order reversed, and verdict reinstated.

Argued June term, 1914, before SEABURY, PAGE, and BIJUR, JJ.

I. & H. Silverman, of New York City, for appellant.

I. Cohen, of New York City, for respondent.

*

For other cases see same topic & § number in Dec. *&*Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep’r Indexes

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff sued for professional services rendered the defendant claiming the reasonable value thereof to be $200. The rendition of the services or their value was not disputed. The only issue tried was as to whether or not the services were to be rendered upon a contingent basis of 10 per cent, upon any amount, collected by the plaintiff. Upon this question there was a conflict of tes*155timony, and a reading of the record shows that the defendant submitted as convincing proof in support of his contention, as did the plaintiff. " The charge was fair, expressly declaring to the jury that but a simple question of fact was involved, and at its close the attorneys respectively stated that they had no requests or exceptions to make. The jury found for the defendant. Subsequently upon motion the court set aside the verdict and ordered a new trial. No exceptions to the introduction of testimony were taken at the trial. The verdict was not contrary to law, nor against the weight of evidence, nor for excessive or insufficient damages, and it is upon one or more of such grounds only that a verdict may be set aside by a trial justice. The record is barren of any reason for this exercise of the power of the court, and therefore the order must be reversed.

Order reversed, with costs, and verdict reinstated.
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXAS NO. WR-83,117-01

EX P ARTE F RANCISCO ARZATE, App licant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 1317247-A IN THE 232ND DISTRICT COURT

F ROM HARRIS COUNTY
Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Ar t i cl e 1 1
. 07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of ca pital murder and sentenc ed to imprisonment for life without par o l e . T h e First Court of Appea ls aff irmed his conviction. No. 01-12-01074- CR (Te x . App.—Houston [1 Dist.] Dec . 17, 2013) (not designated st for publication). Applicant contends that his a p p e ll a te c o u n s e l re n d er e d ineffe ctive assistance beca use counsel did not timely file a petition for discretionar y revie w. We rema

nded this application to the trial court2

for suppleme ntal finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law. Appellate counsel filed an aff idavit with the trial court. Ba sed on that aff idavit, the trial court has enter ed finding s of fa ct an d conclusions of law that appellate counsel failed to file a timely petition for discre tionary

revie w. We find, there fore , that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionar

y revie w of the judgme nt of the First Court of Appea ls in Cause No. 01-12-01074- CR that aff irmed his conviction in Cause No. 131724701010 from the 232 Di s trict Court of Har ris n d County
. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionar y revie w with this Court within 30 day s of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.

Deliver ed: Octobe r 14, 2015 Do not publish
Editorial Note on Subchapter C of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter C appear by Amdt. 381, 65 FR 64586, Oct. 30, 2000.

§ 285.5 Failure to comply. ( a ) Grant funds may be withheld in whole or in part, or denied if there is a substantial failure by the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico to comply with the requirements of § 285.4, or to bring into compliance a plan of operation disapproved by FNS, or to comply with program requirements detailed in the plan of operation approved for that fiscal year. (For example, funds shall be paid to the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico to cover only the costs of the part or parts of the plan of operation receiving FNS approval. Withheld payments shall be paid when the unapproved part(s) of the plan are modified and approved.) FNS shall notify the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico that further payments shall not be made until FNS is satisfied that there will no longer be any such failure to comply.
( b ) Upon a finding of a substantial failure to comply with the requirements of § 285.4 or the plan of operation, FNS may, in addition to or in lieu of actions taken in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section, refer the matter to the Attorney General with a request that injunctive relief be sought from the appropriate district court of the United States to require compliance with these regulations by the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
[Amdt. 209, 47 FR 32409, July 27, 1982. Redesignated by Amdt. 371, 61 FR 60013, Nov. 26, 1996]
OAO 247 (02/08) Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

United States of America )

)

)

)

)

)

v.

Joseph Michael Hardy Case No: 3:97cr18/LAC

USM No: 04089-017

Date of Previous Judgment: 15 July 1997

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Applicable) Defendant’s Attorney

Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

Upon motion of : the defendant 9 the Director of the Bureau of Prisons 9 the court under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has

subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 994(u), and having considered such motion,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:

9 DENIED. : GRANTED and the defendant’s previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in 

the last judgment issued) of 364 months is reduced to 294 months .

I. COURT DETERMINATION OF GUIDELINE RANGE (Prior to Any Departures)

Previous Offense Level: 38 Amended Offense Level: 36

Criminal History Category: IV Criminal History Category: IV

Previous Guideline Range: 324 to 405 months Amended Guideline Range: 262 to 327 months

II. SENTENCE RELATIVE TO AMENDED GUIDELINE RANGE

: The reduced sentence is within the amended guideline range.

9 The previous term of imprisonment imposed was less than the guideline range applicable to the defendant at the time

of sentencing as a result of a departure or Rule 35 reduction, and the reduced sentence is comparably less than the

amended guideline range.

9 Other (explain):

III. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

Except as provided above, all provisions of the judgment dated 15 July 1997 shall remain in effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Order Date: s/L.A. Collier 17 June 2008

Judge’s signature

Effective Date: Lacey A. Collier, Senior U.S. District Judge

(if different from order date) Printed name and title

Case 3:97-cr-00018-LC-MD Document 169 Filed 06/17/08 Page 1 of 1
# L_2021048DE.01001301.xml

| 11.2.2021 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 48/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2021

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 48/13

---

Berichtigung der Delegierten Verordnung (EU) 2020/2191 der Kommission vom 20. November 2020 zur Änderung der Delegierten Verordnung (EU) 2015/2446 der Kommission bezüglich der Fristen für die Abgabe der summarischen Eingangsanmeldung und der Vorabanmeldung bei Beförderung auf dem Seeweg von und nach dem Vereinigten Königreich Großbritannien und Nordirland, den Kanalinseln und der Insel Man

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 434 vom 23. Dezember 2020
  )

Seite 8, Erwägungsgrund 4 Satz 1:

Anstatt:

„Nach Ablauf des Übergangszeitraums muss für Waren, die aus dem Vereinigten Königreich in das Zollgebiet der Union verbracht werden, eine summarische Eingangsmeldung und für Waren, die das Zollgebiet der Union in Richtung des Vereinigten Königreichs (mit Ausnahme Irlands) verlassen, eine Vorabanmeldung vorliegen.“

muss es heißen:

„Nach Ablauf des Übergangszeitraums muss für Waren, die aus dem Vereinigten Königreich in das Zollgebiet der Union verbracht werden, eine summarische Eingangsmeldung und für Waren, die das Zollgebiet der Union in Richtung des Vereinigten Königreichs (mit Ausnahme Nordirlands) verlassen, eine Vorabanmeldung vorliegen.“

---
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

LATHIO JENKINS,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:20cv155–WS/HTC

RICHARD LAUBAUGH,

CHRISTOPHER EDELEN,

CENTURION OF FLORIDA LLC,

Defendants.

 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF

No. 7) docketed May 6, 2020. The magistrate judge recommends that the plaintiff's

complaint and this case be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A and

1915(e)(2) based on the plaintiff's failure to disclose his prior litigation history.

The plaintiff has filed no objections to the report and recommendation.

Having reviewed the record, this court has determined that the magistrate

judge’s report and recommendation is due to be adopted. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED:

Case 4:20-cv-00155-WS-HTC Document 8 Filed 06/10/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (ECF No. 7) is

ADOPTED and incorporated into this order by reference.

2. The plaintiff’s complaint and this action are DISMISSED without

prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A and 1915(e)(2).

3. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: “All claims are dismissed without

prejudice.”

DONE AND ORDERED this 10th day of June , 2020.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:20-cv-00155-WS-HTC Document 8 Filed 06/10/20 Page 2 of 2
#### § 29.2633 Rule 17.

Any lot of tobacco containing 20 percent or more of greenish leaves or any lot which contains 20 percent of greenish and green leaves combined shall be designated by the color symbol “VF.”
Exhibit 10.2



Director Fee Arrangements for 2005


 


         Each director of MutualFirst Financial, Inc.
(the "Company") also is a director of Mutual Federal Savings Bank (the "Bank").
For 2005, as for 2004, each non-employee director receives an annual fee of
$25,200 for serving on the Bank's Board of Directors. In addition to this annual
fee, Wilbur R. Davis receives a $5,000 annual fee for serving as Chairman of the
Board of Directors of the Bank. Directors are not compensated for their service
on the Company's Board of Directors.


         The Bank maintains deferred compensation arrangements with some directors
which allows them to defer all or a portion of their Board fees and receive
income when they are no longer active directors. Deferred amounts earn interest
at the rate of 10 percent per year.
# Amtsblatt C 91A/8. M

| | ISSN 1977-088X |
| --- | --- |
| Amtsblatt
  der Europäischen Union | C 91A |
| | |
| Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache | Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen | 59. Jahrgang8. März 2016 |

ISSN 1977-088X

Amtsblatt

der Europäischen Union

C 91A

Ausgabe in deutscher Sprache

Mitteilungen und Bekanntmachungen

59. Jahrgang8. März 2016

---

| Informationsnummer | Inhalt | Seite |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Bekanntmachungen |
| | VERWALTUNGSVERFAHREN |
| | Europäisches Amt für Personalauswahl (EPSO) |
| 2016/C 091A/01 | Reserveliste — Allgemeines Auswahlverfahren EPSO/AST-SC/04/15 — Amtsdiener (m/w) des Parlaments (AST SC 1) | 1 |

Informationsnummer

Inhalt

Seite

V   Bekanntmachungen

VERWALTUNGSVERFAHREN

Europäisches Amt für Personalauswahl (EPSO)

2016/C 091A/01

Reserveliste — Allgemeines Auswahlverfahren EPSO/AST-SC/04/15 — Amtsdiener (m/w) des Parlaments (AST SC 1)

1

---

| DE | |
| --- | --- |

DE

---

V Bekanntmachungen

VERWALTUNGSVERFAHREN

Europäisches Amt für Personalauswahl (EPSO)

| 8.3.2016 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | CA 91/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2016

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

CA 91/1

---

RESERVELISTE (1)

ALLGEMEINES AUSWAHLVERFAHREN EPSO/AST-SC/04/15

AMTSDIENER (M/W) DES PARLAMENTS (AST SC 1)

(2016/C 091 A/01)

| ANDREOU | Paraskevi |
| --- | --- |
| ASSUMMA | Stefania |
| CROSETTO | Marco |
| DEBOWSKI | Piotr |
| EVANGELISTA | Gladys |
| EZAN | Marianne |
| FACCIOLI LOPES | Tiago |
| FEDERICO | David |
| GAIDARJI | Aura |
| GARCIA GONZALEZ | Carlos |
| GIRGINOV | Kiril |
| GOMEZ MARTIN | Jorge |
| HERTZ-FARAGÓ | Hajnalka |
| KALITA-SUSKA | Sylwia |
| KUBINOVA ZIKOVA | Dagmar |
| MAZÁN | Ilona |
| ONISZK | Katarzyna |
| PACITTI | Florencia |
| PAUSESCU | Alexandru |
| POIRIER | Virginie |
| POLIUCHOVIC | Jaroslava |
| REIMERS | Alexander René |
| SAMUEL | Alexia |
| SAVICKAS | Domas |
| SOKOLOWSKA-LIKENG | Monika Iwona |
| STOYANOVA | Elmira |
| ŠVEHLOVÁ | Eva |
| TUTS | Sebastien |

ANDREOU

Paraskevi

ASSUMMA

Stefania

CROSETTO

Marco

DEBOWSKI

Piotr

EVANGELISTA

Gladys

EZAN

Marianne

FACCIOLI LOPES

Tiago

FEDERICO

David

GAIDARJI

Aura

GARCIA GONZALEZ

Carlos

GIRGINOV

Kiril

GOMEZ MARTIN

Jorge

HERTZ-FARAGÓ

Hajnalka

KALITA-SUSKA

Sylwia

KUBINOVA ZIKOVA

Dagmar

MAZÁN

Ilona

ONISZK

Katarzyna

PACITTI

Florencia

PAUSESCU

Alexandru

POIRIER

Virginie

POLIUCHOVIC

Jaroslava

REIMERS

Alexander René

SAMUEL

Alexia

SAVICKAS

Domas

SOKOLOWSKA-LIKENG

Monika Iwona

STOYANOVA

Elmira

ŠVEHLOVÁ

Eva

TUTS

Sebastien

Die Reserveliste gilt bis zum 30. Juni 2019.

---

(1)  Auf ausdrücklichen Wunsch einer erfolgreichen Prüfungsteilnehmerin oder eines erfolgreichen Prüfungsteilnehmers wird ihr bzw. sein Name nicht veröffentlicht.

---
#### § 2812.9 Disposal.

When the property is no longer needed by the donee, it may be used in support of other Federal projects or sold and the proceeds used for technical and scientific education and research activities.
#### § 29.3555 Tobacco.

Tobacco as it appears between the time it is cured and stripped from the stalk, or primed and cured, and the time it enters into the different manufacturing processes. The acts of stemming, threshing, sweating, and conditioning are not regarded as manufacturing processes. Tobacco, as used in these standards, does not include manufactured or semimanufactured products, stems, cuttings, clippings, trimmings, siftings, or dust.

[30 FR 9207, July 23, 1965. Redesignated and amended at 49 FR 16759, Apr. 20, 1984]
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-10487) and in the Prospectus constituting part of
the Registration Statements on Form S-3 No. 333-58635, No. 333-43423 and No.
333-45913) of Metal Management, Inc., of our report dated May 28, 1998, except
as to Notes 2 and 5, which are as of May 4, 1999, appearing in this Form 10-K/A.
 
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
 
Chicago, Illinois
May 4, 1999
#### HENDERSON, Appellant, v. GRIFFIN, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

July 24, 1906.)

In the matter of the judicial settlement of the account of Hanford M. Henderson, as executor, etc., of Mary B. Bulkley, deceased, etc., and *1121Sara K. Henderson, as executrix, etc., against Delos Griffin, as administrator, etc., of Jane A. Bulkley, deceased.

No opinion. Decree of the Surrogate's Court of •Westchester County affirmed, with costs.
#### § 29.79 Disposition of ticket.

One copy of the mandatory inspection ticket shall be attached to, or placed on, the tobacco certificated as a further identification of the lot and all copies of such ticket shall become null and void when such identifying copy is removed from the lot. When and as requested by the Director, one copy of such ticket, showing (a) the certification of type and grade; (b) the weight and other identification; and (c) the details of the sale at auction, shall be delivered by the warehouseman to the Division or the head inspector of the market.
Editorial Note on Subchapter C of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter C appear by Amdt. 381, 65 FR 64586, Oct. 30, 2000.

Editorial Note on Part 279
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 279 appear at 68 FR 41052, July 10, 2003.

§ 279.4 Action upon receipt of a request for review. ( a ) *Holding action.* Upon receipt of a request for review of administrative action, the administrative action shall be held in abeyance until the designated reviewer has made a determination. However, permanent disqualifications for trafficking shall not be held in abeyance and shall be effective immediately as specified in 278.6(b)(2) of this chapter. If the disqualification is reversed through administrative or judicial review, the Secretary shall not be held liable for the value of any sales lost during the disqualification period. If the administrative action in question involves the denial of a claim brought by a firm against FNS, or the forfeiture of a collateral bond or the draw down on an irrevocable letter of credit, the designated reviewer shall direct the firm not be approved for participation, not be paid any part of the disputed claim, or not be reimbursed for any bond forfeiture or irrevocable letter of credit withdrawal, as appropriate until the designated reviewer has made a determination.
( b ) *Filing supporting information.* If the request filed by the firm includes a request for an opportunity to file written information in support of its position at a later date, the designated reviewer shall promptly notify the firm of the date by which the information shall be filed. If the firm fails to file any information in support of its position by the designated date, the information submitted with the original request shall be considered to be the only information submitted by the firm. In that case, if no information in support of the firm's position was submitted with the original request, the action of the appropriate FNS office shall be final.
( c ) *Extensions of time.* Upon timely written request to FNS by the firm requesting the review, FNS may grant extensions of time if, in FNS' discretion, additional time is required for the firm to fully present information in support of its position. Additionally, FNS may not grant extensions of time or hold the administrative review process in abeyance solely on the basis of a pending FOIA request or appeal. No extension may be made in the time allowed for the filing of a request for review.
[Amdt. 136, 43 FR 43279, Sept. 22, 1978, as amended by Amdt. 236, 49 FR 22059, May 25, 1984; Amdt. 258, 49 FR 28393, July 12, 1984; 49 FR 29769, July 24, 1984; Amdt. 356, 59 FR 29714, June 9, 1994; 64 FR 23174, Apr. 30, 1999. Redesignated and amended at 68 FR 41053, July 10, 2003; 73 FR 79595, Dec. 30, 2008; 85 FR 52749, Aug. 26, 2020]
§ 22.205 Allocation of loan and grant funds. ( a ) Title I grant funds and approved loan funding levels will be allocated among States by a formula designed to ensure equitable treatment. This applies to amounts made available for business and industrial loans, water, sewer and other community facilities except electrical and telephone facilities provided by or through the Rural Electrification Administration.
( b ) During the second half of the fiscal year, the Secretary of Agriculture shall review State and multicounty jurisdictional rural development programs and projects so that unused allocations may be shifted from one State to another so as to enable the obligation of all available funds prior to the end of the fiscal year.
( c ) The formula used for fund allocation will ensure that a minimum loan and grant level is established so that no State receives an amount too small to serve the purposes of the Act. A percentage of total loan and grant authority will be withheld from initial allocation to allow subsequent appropriate technical adjustments in amounts allocated to individual States.
( d ) Title V funds shall be distributed by the Secretary under the formula specified in the Act. Title V activities will be consistent with the principle that States and multicounty jurisdictions have responsibility for the rural development planning and priority setting functions.
98-1359.

#### State v. Brown.

Hamilton App. No. C-980060. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted.

Douglas, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.