IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. Case No. 3:94cr3136/RV

BENNIE CLEVELAND WILLIAMS

 /

ORDER

Bennie Cleveland Williams was found guilty of conspiracy to possess with intent

to distribute cocaine and cocaine base. His guideline range was determined to be life

imprisonment (total offense level of 44). Williams was sentenced on May 3, 1995,

to life imprisonment followed by 10 years supervised release. The defendant was

facing a minimum mandatory term of 20 years to life based upon an enhancement filed

in his case. Williams appealed his sentence and on January 28, 1997, the Eleventh

Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction and sentence. On February 19, 1998,

the defendant filed a motion to vacate under Title 28, United States Code, Section

2255. On February 1, 2000, the Court denied the motion. The defendant appealed

the Court’s ruling on this motion and subsequent motions. On July 5, 2007, the

defendant’s application for leave to file a second or successive motion to vacate, set

aside, or correct sentence was denied by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.

Williams has now filed a motion to modify his term of imprisonment pursuant

to Title 18, United States Code, Section 3582(c)(2) [Reduction of Term of

Imprisonment Based upon Sentencing Range which has been Subsequently Lowered

by the Sentencing Commission]. The basis of his motion is an amendment to

guidelines (#591) concerning the application of the sentencing guidelines to the

Case 3:94-cr-03136-RV-CJK Document 333 Filed 09/13/07 Page 1 of 3
2

“offense of conviction,” which is authorized to be applied retroactively pursuant to

section 1B1.10. Although an enhancement was filed in the defendant’s case, Williams

argues section 4B1.1 prohibits the use of the enhanced statutory maximum in the

determination of the offense level. Therefore, the defendant argues his applicable

guideline range should be 188 to 235 months imprisonment.

Amendment 591, which became effective in November 2000, requires that the

selection of the offense guideline be based only on the statute or the “offense of

conviction.” This amendment simply clarified that in order for the enhanced penalties

in section 2D1.2 [Drug Offenses Occurring Near Protected Locations] to apply, a

defendant must be convicted of an offense which references section 2D1.2, rather

than simply engaging in conduct described by that section. This amendment was also

made retroactive pursuant to section 1B1.10. Mr. Williams was convicted by a jury

of a violation of Title 21, United States Code, sections 841(b)(1)(A)(iii) and 846 which

carries a statutory penalty, after application of an enhancement, of 20 years to life.

A review of the presentence report reflects that no guideline calculations were made

in regard to section 2D1.2.

In U.S. v. Moreno, 421 F.3d 1217 (11th Cir. 2005), the Eleventh Circuit Court

of Appeals ruled that amendment 591 does not provide a basis for reduction of

sentence under Title 18, United States Code, section 3582(c)(2), because it applies

only to the selection of the relevant offense guideline, not the selection of the base

offense level. In Moreno, the Court stated this amendment does not constrain the use

of judicially found facts to select a base offense level within the relevant guideline.

Moreno further noted the Eleventh Circuit has held in Varela v. U.S., 400 F.3d 864,

868 (11th Cir. 2005), that U.S. v. Booker, 543 U.S. 200, 125 S.Ct. 738 (2005), does

not apply retroactively to cases on collateral review. Further, since Booker is a

Supreme Court decision, and not a retroactively applicable guideline amendment by the

Sentencing Commission, Booker is inapplicable to section 3582(c)(2) motions. See

also, U.S. v. Crawford, 2007 WL 1745876 (11th Cir. 2007) (unpublished) (a request

Case 3:94-cr-03136-RV-CJK Document 333 Filed 09/13/07 Page 2 of 3
3

for sentencing relief under amendment 591 is outside the “scope” of a Title 18, United

States Code, section 3582(c)(2) motion). 

Defendant Williams was not determined to be a career offender under the

provisions of section 4B1.1. Therefore, amendment 591 has no application to the

defendant’s case. The motion (doc. 329) must be, and is, DENIED. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 13th day of September, 2007.

 /s/Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

Senior United States District Judge

Case 3:94-cr-03136-RV-CJK Document 333 Filed 09/13/07 Page 3 of 3