alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the**

**Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ruth’sChris Steak House, Inc. for the quarter ended April 1, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and President of Ruth’s Chris SteakHouse, Inc., certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof Ruth’s Chris Steak House, Inc. 

Date: May 9, 2007 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Ruth’sChris Steak House, Inc. and will be retained by Ruth’s Chris Steak House, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


I, Alicia B. Derrah, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Man-AHL 130, LLC
("registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant 's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant 's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant 's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant 's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant 's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant 's internal control over
financial reporting.

By:  /s/ Alicia B. Derrah


----------------------------------
Alicia B. Derrah
Chief Financial Officer
February 14, 2008


                                      E-3
#### § 29.2461 Summary of standard grades.

| *4 Grades of wrappers* | | | | |
| A1F | A2F | A1D | A2D | |
| *20 Grades of thin leaf* | | | | |
| C1L | C1F | | | |
| C2L | C2F | C2D | | |
| C3L | C3F | C3D | C3M | C3G |
| C4L | C4F | C4D | C4M | C4G |
| C5L | C5F | C5D | C5M | C5G |
| *5 Grades of nondescript* | | | | |
| N1L | N1D | N1GL | N1GD | |
| N2 | | | | |
| *16 Grades of heavy leaf* | | | | |
| B1F | B1D | | | |
| B2F | B2D | | | |
| B3F | B3D | B3M | B3G | |
| B4F | B4D | B4M | B4G | |
| B5F | B5D | B5M | B5G | |
| *21 Grades of lugs* | | | | |
| X1L | X1F | X1D | | |
| X2L | X2F | X2D | | |
| X3L | X3F | X3D | X3M | X3G |
| X4L | X4F | X4D | X4M | X4G |
| X5L | X5F | X5D | X5M | X5G |
| *1 Grade of scrap* | | | | |
| S | | | | |

Special factors “U”, “W” and “SF” may be applied to all grades. Tobacco not covered by the standard grades is designated “No-G.”

Standard sizes applicable.

| A1, A2 | 2, 3 |
| B1 | 2, 3 |
| B2, B3, B4, B5 | 1, 2, 3 |
| C1 | 2, 3 |
| C2, C3, C4, C5 | 1, 2, 3 |
| X3, X4, X5, M and G1 | 2 |
| | |
| --- | --- |
| 1 No size is applied to these grades if tobacco is under size 2. | |

[[45 FR 44293](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/45-FR-44293), July 1, 1980, as amended at [51 FR 40406](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/51-FR-40406), Nov. 7, 1986]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENSACOLA DIVISION 

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCTS 

LIABILITY LITIGATION 

This Document Relates to All Cases 

Case No. 3:19md2885 

Judge M. Casey Rodgers 

Magistrate Judge Hope T. Cannon 

ORDER 

The Court has previously directed BrownGreer to limit access to MDL 

Centrality to plaintiffs’ firms that have signed a participation agreement and clarified 

the extent of this limitation.1 See ECF Nos. 3501 and 3605. Pending before the Court 

is a motion filed by Plaintiffs’ Leadership requesting permission to share additional 

data points, specifically data related to census forms, Touhy requests, and DOEHRS 

data produced by the DoD, with any MDL Party’s bankruptcy professionals 

including the Tort Claimants’ bankruptcy professionals. See ECF No. 3683. 

On consideration, Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED. Plaintiffs’ Leadership 

may share the requested information; however, Plaintiffs’ Leadership must do so by 

using an independent secure method of their choosing, not by granting access 

directly through their MDL Centrality account. 

1

 In its Order entered December 5, 2023, the Court emphasized the efforts by leadership 

for both sides, a special master, BrownGreer, the Department of Defense, the Department of 

Justice, and the Court to obtain DOEHRS data and reiterated that firms may only access DOEHRS 

data by signing a participation agreement. See ECF No. 3605 at 2. 

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3691 Filed 03/06/23 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

DONE AND ORDERED on this 6th day of March, 2023. 

_________________________________ 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3691 Filed 03/06/23 Page 2 of 2
p.1 

OAR Box 1384 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

jm ll-E-200 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:11 AM Sheet 240 of 264 
P.2 

FILE No. 187 11/25 '98 15=51 ID:WERNER CO 724 588 1621 

U/2S/98 13:18 FAX 019 541 5689 US EPA/BSD/CCPG 

PAGE 1 

CONTACT REPORT 

From: Madeleine Strum, US EPA, OAQPS, Coatings and Consumer Products Group 

Date of Contact; November 25, 1998 

Contact: Mr. Dennis DeSilvey 

Company/Agency: The Werner Co, 

Telephone Number: 724 588 2000 EXT 2251 / FAX 724 588 1621 

GO 002/002 

i v , 

ppA'AiR.oorurr 

.,-! 

CONTACT SUMMARY; 

Mr. DeSilvey was called to discuss the information in the letter sent to me on October 9, 1998. 

Li particular, we discussed the estimate that Mr. DeSilvey provided for the amount of time it 

would take for operators to track and monitor the amount of time the enclosure would be open 

during an 8 hour shift. The estimate provided in the letter was 30 minutes. This value was based 

on the data collected during Werner's study of the time duration for which the enclosure would be 

in the open position due to process or operational adjustments that are routinely made on any 

given shift. I asked why it took so long to track this information. Mr. DeSilvey replied that the 

operators tracking the infonnation tended to write essays with regard to the reason that the 

enclosure would be opened We discussed that all the operators had to do was to check the 

reason (which could be contained on the recordkeeping form) and would not have to write 

anything but the time durations. Because of this, I explained that I thought it would take perhaps 

only 5 minutes. Mr. DeSilvey stated that he thought that it might take 8-10 minutes, but on 

average, 8 minutes would be a good overall estimate since for some shifts it could take less. 

ACCURATE AS STATED fy—'o H - lf\m^Sj
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 24.2


                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

         KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby
constitutes and appoints each of Beverly L. Brown, Robert K. Kretzman, Lawrence
E. Kreider and Joram C. Salig or any of them, each acting alone, his true and
lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution, for him and
his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, in connection with the
THE COSMETIC CENTER, INC. (the "Corporation") Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 27, 1997 (the "Form 10-K") under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including, without limiting the generality of
the foregoing, to sign the Form 10-K in the name and on behalf of the
Corporation or on behalf of the undersigned as a director or officer of the
Corporation, and any amendments to the Form 10-K and any instrument, contract,
document or other writing, of or in connection with the Form 10-K or amendments
thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents
in connection therewith, including this power of attorney, with the Securities
and Exchange Commission and any applicable securities exchange or securities
self-regulatory body, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each
acting alone, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and
thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to
all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying
and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone,
or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue
hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed these presents this 13
day of February, 1998.

                             /s/ DAVID N. DINKINS
                             ----------------------------
                             DAVID N. DINKINS
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 223 (Friday, November 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 70934]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29197]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Center For Research Resources; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Center for Research Resources 
Special Emphasis Panel.
    Date: February 1, 2011.
    Time: 12 p.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, NCRR/OR, Democracy I, 6701 
Democracy Blvd., 1066, Bethesda, MD 20892. (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Bonnie Dunn, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Office of Review, National Center for Research Resources, National 
Institutes of Health, 6705 Democracy Blvd., Dem. 1, Room 1074, MSC 
4874, Bethesda, MD 20892-4874. 301-435-0824. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#67031209090508270a060e0b49090e0f49000811"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a5c1d0cbcbc7cae5c8c4ccc98bcbcccd8bc2cad3">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research; 93.371, Biomedical 
Technology; 93.389, Research Infrastructure, 93.306, 93.333; 93.702, 
ARRA Related Construction Awards., National Institutes of Health, 
HHS)

    Dated: November 15, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-29197 Filed 11-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:87-cr-01018-MP-2

PERCIVAL ALEXANDER HUSSEY,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 3, Motion to Dismiss Filed by the United States. 

The government moved to dismiss the charges against Mr. Hussey because of the age of the case

and the unlikelihood of a successful prosecution at this late date. Upon consideration, the

motion is granted.

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

Doc. 3, the indictment against Mr. Hussey is dismissed, and the Clerk is directed to close

this case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 12th day of October, 2011

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

JORGE F. PORTO-SIERRA,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:20cv5397/LAC/EMT

FRIENDLY MOTEL AND INN, et al.,

Defendants.

__________________________/

O R D E R

The Chief Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation on May 4,

2020 (ECF No. 6). The court furnished Plaintiff a copy of the Report and

Recommendation and afforded him an opportunity to file objections pursuant to

Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined it

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The Chief Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No.

6) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

Case 3:20-cv-05397-LC-EMT Document 7 Filed 06/02/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

2. The clerk of court is directed to transfer this case to the United States

DistrictCourtfortheMiddleDistrict ofFlorida andclose the case in theNorthernDistrict.

DONE AND ORDERED this 2ndday of June, 2020.

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No. 3:20cv5397/LAC/EMT

Case 3:20-cv-05397-LC-EMT Document 7 Filed 06/02/20 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7380

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ANTONIO SIVAL CAMPBELL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CR-90-30-A, CA-97-690-AM)

Submitted: January 22, 1998 Decided: February 4, 1998

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antonio Sival Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. Bernard James Apperson,

III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Campbell, Nos. CR-90-30-A; CA-97-690-AM

(E.D. Va. July 30, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO: 3:96cr74/RV 

3:03cv190/RV/MD

DARRELL GREEN

_____________________________________________________________________

ORDER

The defendant has filed a Request for C.O.A. (doc. 557) in which he presumably

wishes to appeal either the court’s denial of his motion to reconsider movant’s motion

pursuant to Rule 60(b)1 (doc. 555) or its denial of his motion to amend (doc. 554). In either

event, defendant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right,

and therefore, a certificate of appealability is DENIED.

No motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis has been filed. The defendant has

not shown that the appeal is taken in good faith or that he is otherwise entitled to so 

proceed on appeal. Accordingly, the $255.00 filing fee shall be paid within 30 days from

the date of this order.

DONE AND ORDERED this 28th day of April, 2005.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:96-cr-00074-RV-EMT Document 560 Filed 04/28/05 Page 1 of 1
#### John G. Madden, Appellant, v Natalie M. Madden, Respondent.

In an action for divorce, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered January 8, 1980, which granted defendant’s application for a change of venue from Bronx County to Westchester County. Order reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and motion denied. Special Term erred in holding that CPLR 507 and *Turner v Turner*(84 Misc 2d 229) supported a change of venue. The court in Bronx County may clearly determine any question as to title or possession of real property arising incident to the matrimonial action,-notwithstanding that such property is located in Westchester County. (See Domestic Relations Law, § 234; Siegel, 1964 Practice Commentary, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 14, Domestic Relations Law, § 234, 1979-1980 Pocket Part, p 8.) Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Titone and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
# Providing an Order of Succession Within the Department of Justice

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998, 5 U.S.C. 3345 
                    *et seq*., it is hereby ordered that:

**Section 1.**
                      
                    *Order of Succession.*
                    Subject to the provisions of section 2 of this order, the following officers, in the order listed, shall act as and perform the functions and duties of the office of Attorney General, during any period in which the Attorney General, the Deputy Attorney General, the Associate Attorney General, and any officers designated by the Attorney General pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 508 to act as Attorney General have died, resigned, or otherwise become unable to perform the functions and duties of the office of Attorney General, until such time as at least one of the officers mentioned above is able to perform the functions and duties of that office:

(a)  United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia;

(b)  United States Attorney for the District of Minnesota; and

(c)  United States Attorney for the District of Arizona.

**Sec. 2.**
                      
                    *Exceptions.*
                    (a)  No individual who is serving in an office listed in section 1 of this order in an acting capacity, by virtue of so serving, shall act as Attorney General pursuant to this order.

(b)  No individual listed in section 1 shall act as Attorney General unless that individual is otherwise eligible to so serve under the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998.

(c)  Notwithstanding the provisions of this order, the President retains discretion, to the extent permitted by law, to depart from this order in designating an acting Attorney General.

**Sec. 3.**
                     Executive Order 13481 of December 9, 2008, is revoked.

**Sec. 4.**
                     This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity, by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.



[FR Doc. 2010-28365 Billing code 3195-W1-P
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Ruths Hospitality Group, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended
March 29, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:
May 8, 2009



/s/ ROBERT M. VINCENTRobert M. VincentExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ofRuths Hospitality Group, Inc.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2167 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2167

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To authorize the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to 
  establish additional requirements to improve the fiscal safety and 
  soundness of the home equity conversion mortgage insurance program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reverse Mortgage Stabilization Act 
of 2013''.

SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL SAFETY AND SOUNDNESS REQUIREMENTS FOR HOME EQUITY 
              CONVERSION MORTGAGE INSURANCE PROGRAM.

    Subsection (h) of section 255 of the National Housing Act (12 
U.S.C. 1715z-20(h)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) establish, by notice or mortgagee letter, any 
        additional or alternative requirements that the Secretary, in 
        the Secretary's discretion, determines are necessary to improve 
        the fiscal safety and soundness of the program authorized by 
        this section, which requirements shall take effect upon 
        issuance.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 12, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2167

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To authorize the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to 
  establish additional requirements to improve the fiscal safety and 
  soundness of the home equity conversion mortgage insurance program.
```