alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      99.4




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT**







I,
      E. F.
      H. Roberts, certify that:





1.  I
      have
      reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Petro-Canada;





2.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
      in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
      results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods
      presented in this report;





4.  The
      issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules
      13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:





a)  designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
      and
      procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
      information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
      is
      made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
      in which this report is being prepared;





b)  evaluated
      the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and
      presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
      this
      report based on such evaluation; and





c)  disclosed
      in this report any change in the issuer's internal control over financial
      reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that
      has
      materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer's
      internal control over financial reporting; and





5.  The
      issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
      evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer's
      auditors and the audit committee of the issuer's board of directors (or persons
      performing the equivalent functions):





a)  all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report
      financial information; and





b)  any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the issuer's control over financial reporting.





Date:
                March 23, 2006
            /s/
                E. F. H. Roberts
              E.
                F. H. RobertsExecutive
                Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Jose M. Arzuaga, an Infant, by His Mother and Natural Guardian, Geneviva Rivera, et al., Respondents, v New York City Transit Authority, Appellant.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered February 28, 1979, granting the petition and directing that the respondent reveal its records in this matter, excepting materials prepared for litigation, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the petition dismissed, with costs. Petitioner, after having been injured in a subway, filed a notice of claim *519with the New York City Transit Authority. Petitioner’s counsel, by letter dated November 10, 1978, requested all police and other records in the possession of the transit authority. The claimed statutory authority for granting this request was article 6 of the Public Officers Law, known popularly as the Freedom of Information Law. This request was denied by the transit authority with the advice that police reports could be obtained by writing to the transit authority police and enclosing the appropriate fee. Petitioner instituted this article 78 proceeding to compel the production of these records. Special Term granted relief to the petitioner, and we would reverse. We note in the first instance that the police reports were not refused him, but, rather, he was required to pay the appropriate fee to obtain them. The balance of the records which were sought were properly denied to petitioner. The gravamen of article 6 of the Public Officers Law is to give the public access to documents explaining the bases of governmental decision making (Public Officers Law, § 84), subject to reasonable limitations (see, e.g., Public Officers Law, § 87, subd 2). We have noted in the past that the law was not intended to afford a new research tool to private litigants in matters not affected by a public interest *(Matter of D’Alessandro v Unemployment Ins. Appeal Bd.,*56 AD2d 762, 763).* Petitioner has not shown that his request is anything other than an ill-advised shortcut to the Civil Practice Law and Rules discovery procedures. We note, parenthetically, that were this to be deemed a notice for discovery pursuant to CPLR 3120, it would have to be stricken as overly broad in scope *(City of New York v Friedberg & Assoc.,*62 AD2d 407), and were it to be deemed a notice of discovery in aid of framing a complaint it, too, would fail (see, e.g., CPLR 3102, subd [c]; 3A Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, par 3102.14). Concur —Murphy, P. J., Lane, Lupiano, Silverman and Ross, JJ.

*

 The 1977 amendments, which became effective January 1, 1978, do not affect that ruling (see, e.g., *Matter of New York Teachers Pension Assn. v Teachers’ Retirement System of City of N. Y.,*71 AD2d 250).
#### § 160.77 Reporting on use of standards.

Each person to whom any duplicates of the United States Standards for rosin have been loaned under any provision in this part shall, from time to time, submit such reports on the use and condition thereof as may be required by the Administrator.
#### The State ex rel. Davie, Appellant, *v.*Callahan, Judge, Appellee.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Davie v. Callahan*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 279.]

(No. 98-558

Submitted July 8, 1998

Decided September 30, 1998.)

*Michael D. Davie, pro se.*

*Maureen O’Connor,*Summit County Prosecuting Attorney, and *Paul Michael Marie,*Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed; the cause is now moot.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

*280Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Cook, J.,

dissenting. Mootness warrants dismissal of the appeal rather than affirmance of the judgment of the court of appeals. See, *e.g., State ex rel. Santora v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections*(1962), 174 Ohio St. 11, 21 O.O.2d 35, 185 N.E.2d 438.

Lundberg Stratton, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.
Exhibit32.2

******** 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,  **

**asadopted pursuant to**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**** 

****

           In connection with the Annual Report ofTheragenics Corporation®, (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James A. MacLennan,Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and 

 

(2)   The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periodsreferred to in the Report.

 

 

By: /s/ James A.MacLennan                

James A.MacLennan

Treasurer and ChiefFinancial Officer

March 15,2005

 

 

A signed original ofthis written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to TheragenicsCorporation® and will be retained by TheragenicsCorporation® and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.
#### § 29.3532 Mixed (M).

Variegated or distinctly different colors of the type mingled together. (See Rules 17, § 29.3618; 18, § 29.3619.)

[30 FR 9207, July 23, 1965. Redesignated at 49 FR 16759, Apr. 20, 1984]
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 21.1

                SUBSIDIARIES OF NATIONAL SANITARY SUPPLY COMPANY

            The following is a list of subsidiaries of the Company as of
December 31, 1996. Each of the companies is incorporated under the laws of the
state following its name. The percentage given represents the voting securities
of each company owned by the Company or its subsidiary as of December 31, 1996.

            All of the companies listed below are included in the consolidated
financial statements as of December 31, 1996.

                  Century Papers, Inc.               (Texas, 100%)
                  National Sanitary Supply
                   Development, Inc.                 (Delaware, 100%)
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.42    
    


EXECUTIVE OFFICER SEVERANCE PAY POLICY

(As Updated Through January 1, 2005) 


The
company recognizes that it is usually difficult for an executive officer whose employment is terminated involuntarily to obtain a position comparable to the one he or she has with the company. In
view of this, any officer (holding the title of vice president or above) who is terminated involuntarily will be entitled to receive severance pay equal to one year's base salary, unless the officer
is terminated for disciplinary reasons (as determined by the company) in which case he or she will not be eligible for severance pay. Mandatory retirement pursuant to the company's Executive Officer
Mandatory Retirement Policy will not be deemed involuntary termination of employment for purposes of severance pay or any other benefits. 


The
company, at its sole discretion, may elect to make the severance payment in equal payments over a 12-month period or in a lump sum. The company may also, at its sole discretion,
continue certain group insurance coverage on behalf of the terminated executive officer for up to 12 months following the date of termination to the extent consistent with the company's
Separation of Employment Policy. 


The
company's Executive Officer Mandatory Retirement Policy and Separation of Employment Policy will govern all other aspects of the termination of employment of executive officers. 











QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.42
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

CHARITO MELVIN,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No.: 5:20cv51-MW/ZCB

WALMART, INC.,

Defendant.

___________________________/ 

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report 

and Recommendation. ECF No. 124. Upon consideration, no objections having 

been filed by the parties,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation, ECF No. 124, is accepted and adopted as 

this Court’s opinion. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, ECF 

No. 120, is DENIED. Defendant’s motion to strike or for summary denial of 

Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, ECF No. 121, is GRANTED to the extent 

the motion for summary judgment is denied. This matter is referred to the Magistrate 

Case 5:20-cv-00051-MW-ZCB Document 138 Filed 01/17/23 Page 1 of 2
2

Judge for further proceedings.

SO ORDERED on January 17, 2023.

s/Mark E. Walker ____

Chief United States District Judge

Case 5:20-cv-00051-MW-ZCB Document 138 Filed 01/17/23 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)

I, Randolph Gress,
certify that:

1. the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 (the Report),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Innophos, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided Innophos, Inc. and will be retained by Innophos, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The undersigned expressly disclaims any obligation to
update the foregoing certification except as required by law.

Date: November 14, 2007



/s/ RANDOLPH GRESSRandolph GressChief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer)


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to the requirements of 18
U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as a part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Destin Airport Works To Resolve Possible FBO Anti-Trust Violation

by Curt Epstein

May 8, 2014, 2:30 AM

Officials at Florida’s Destin Fort Walton Beach Airport and the owners of Destin Jet, one of two FBOs on the field, are working to

resolve a dispute involving county anti-trust safeguards and FAA grant assurance violations that resulted when the owners of

Destin Jet allegedly purchased rival provider Regal Air Destin at the end of last year and continued to operate both facilities

without notifying the airport authority. The allegations were first reported in the Northwest Florida Daily News, and according to

Okaloosa County airports director Sunil Harman, airport users raised a flag after noticing a lack of competition between the two

facilities over the past several months.

Sterling Diversified, which lists Destin Jet primary owner Jay Odom as its registered agent and manager, bought Regal Air Destin

LLC on Dec. 31, 2013, according to the county. Sterling countered stating it had purchased only managing control of Regal

Capital LLC, a separate legal entity that happens to be the owner of single-member LLC Regal Air Destin.

Odom told AIN that under the structure of the lease, his legal council believed there was no reason to notify the county and that

there was no attempt on his part to conceal the purchase. The ownership of Sterling Diversified has apologized “for any issues”

and is retroactively seeking county approval for its purchase. The airport authority agrees that fuel sales data suggest the airport

cannot support two FBOs, and the two sides are engaged in amicable discussions, Harman told AIN. An FAA review of the

matter is expected before a decision to merge the two locations is made.

https://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/aviation-international-news/2014-05-08/destin-airport-works-resolve-possible-fbo-antitrust-violation

(;+,%,7

-

Case 3:20-cv-03678-MCR-ZCB Document 57-10 Filed 09/28/22 Page 1 of 1
2006-0525.

#### Berman v. Sheward.

In Prohibition. On relator’s emergency complaint in prohibition and respondent’s answer and motion for judgment on the pleadings. On S.Ct.Prae.R. X(5) determination, cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (i)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Dated: August 9, 2007
    /s/ Richard R. WoolcottRichard R. WoolcottPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)Dated: August 9, 2007
    /s/ Douglas P. CollierDouglas P. CollierChief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
FLN (Rev. 4/2004) Deficiency Order Page 1 of 1

3:97cr129LAC - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs. CALVIN JOEL TROUTMAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs

CALVIN JOEL TROUTMAN

Case No.3:97cr129LAC

ORDER

Your document, MOTION TO PRESERVE NEW “RECOGNIZED RIGHT PURSUANT

TO U.S. V BOOKER, 543 U.S. 220 (2005) OR ALTERNATIVELY A MOTION TO

VACATE OR SET ASIDE CONVICTION OR SENTENCE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §

2255 was referred to the undersigned with the following deficiencies:

The document does not have a complete Certificate of Service as

required by Rule 5(b) and (d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,

showing proper service. The Certificate of Service does not list the name

and address of the party served. 

For these reasons, IT IS ORDERED that the document shall remain in the electronic

file, but the court will not consider it until you have corrected the above deficiencies

through the filing of a corrected document.

DONE and ORDERED this 30th day of January, 2006.

s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:97-cr-00129-LC Document 144 Filed 01/30/06 Page 1 of 1
In the Matter of: 

INTRA ALASKA CLASS 

SERVICE MAIL RATES 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

_______________________ ) 

WITHDRAWAL OF EQUALIZATION 

NOTICES OF CORVUS AIRLINES, INC. 

Docket OST-03-14694 

Docket OST-03-14695 

On June 20, 2013, Corvus Airlines, Inc., hereby "Corvus Airlines' (previously Era Aviation), carrier code 

7H, filed an equalization notice in these Dockets (collectively "Notice of Equalization") in accordance 

with the provisions of Order 90-10-34 in connection with mail service provided by Corvus Airlines in the 

Anchorage-Aniak market. 

In the Notice of Equalization and pursuant to the provisions in Order 90-10-34, Corvus Airlines indicated 

the Notice of Equalization would be effective on immediately (June 20th, 2013) and would remain so 

"until written notice filed at least ten (10) days in advance of such termination", Notice of Equalization, 

page 1. 

Corvus Airlines hereby gives notice of termination of the effectiveness of the Notice of Equalization for 

the Anchorage-Aniak market only effective February 215\ 2015. 

WHEREFORE, Corvus Airlines, Inc. gives this notice of its withdrawal of the previously files Notice of 

Equalization with respect to the Anchorage-Aniak market effective February 215\ 2015. 

Respectfully Submitted, Robert Hajdukovich 

CEO 

Corvus Airlines, Inc., DBA Ravn Alaska 
Anchorage, Alaska 99502 

907-266-8424 

Certificate of Service: 

Anchorage, Alaska 99502 

907-266-8300 

I hereby certify that a copy of the forgoing Notice by Corvus Airlines, Inc. has been served this February 

4th, 2015 upon each of the following addresses: 

Dennis.devany@dot.gov Robert.e.lochmann@usps.gov 

Joefjr.mcdonald@usps.gov 

dsquier@nac.aero 

shoshaw@evertsair.com 

scottb@penair.com 

alo@penair.com 

greg@aceaircargo.com 

deaton.steven@gmail.com
EXHIBIT
32
  Certification
 Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 (Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code)
  Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of
the undersigned officers of Response Genetics, Inc., (the “Company”), does
hereby certify, to the best of such officer’s knowledge, that:
  The
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Form
10-K/A”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the
information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
  Date:
      April 30, 2010
              /s/
      Kathleen DanenbergKathleen
      Danenberg
                President
      and Chief Executive Officer
                (Principal
      Executive Officer)Date:
      April 30, 2010
              /s/
      Eric AlcornEric
      Alcorn
                Vice
      President Finance and Administration
                (Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) or its staff upon request. This
certification “accompanies” the Form 10-K/A to which it relates, is not deemed
filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of
the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the
Form 10-K/A), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in
such filing.
#### § 28.952 Testing of samples.

The Director or an authorized representative, upon written requests, shall make fiber and processing tests of the properties of cotton samples and report the results thereof to the persons from whom such requests are received, subject to compliance by such persons with the regulations in this subpart and to the payment by them of fees as prescribed herein.

[46 FR 30073, June 5, 1981; 46 FR 51593, Oct. 21, 1981]
#### § 2500.047 Project meetings.

In addition to reviewing and monitoring the status of progress and final technical reports and financial reports, OAO Project Officers may use regular and periodic conference calls to monitor the awardee's performance as well as conferences, workshops, meetings, and symposia to not only monitor the awards, but to facilitate communication and the sharing of project results. These opportunities also serve to eliminate or minimize OAO funding of unneeded duplicative project activities. Required attendance at these conference calls, conferences, workshops, meetings, and symposia will be identified in the RFP or award document.
#### § 27.15 Withdrawal or rejection of classification or Micronaire determination requests.

Any request for classification or for Micronaire determination may be withdrawn by the applicant at any time before the classification or Micronaire determination of the cotton covered thereby, subject to the payment of such fees, if any, as may be prescribed under §§ 27.80 to 27.92. Any request for classification or for Micronaire determination may be rejected for noncompliance with the act or this subpart.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

KEITH WROMAS JR.,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:20cv2698/MCR/ZCB

LIEUTENANT MURSCH,

Defendant.

_____________________/

ORDER

The magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on October 24,

2022. (Doc. 83). The Court furnished the parties a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, 

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all 

timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed 

objections thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be 

adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED: the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 83) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

Case 3:20-cv-02698-MCR-ZCB Document 135 Filed 01/04/23 Page 1 of 2
2

DONE AND ORDERED this 4th day of January 2023.

M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-02698-MCR-ZCB Document 135 Filed 01/04/23 Page 2 of 2
#### § 29.3518 Foreign matter.

Any extraneous substance or material such as stalks, suckers, straw, strings, and rubber bands. Abnormal amounts of dirt or sand are also included. (See Rule 24, § 29.3625.)