alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS

EARPLUG PRODUCTS

LIABILITY LITIGATION

Case No. 3:19-md-2885

This document relates to:

Rashaan G. Canady

Judge M. Casey Rodgers

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones

Case No. 8:20-cv-05409

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

Comes now STEVE N. SNYDER, with the law firm of WILLIAMS MCDANIEL, 

PLLC, and gives notice that he will appear as counsel of record for Rashaan G. Canady in the 

Master Docket pursuant to Pretrial Order No. 3 [ECF No. 4]. Mr. Snyder has completed the 

administrative requirements outlined in Pretrial Order No. 3, and has been granted admission 

pro hac vice pursuant to paragraph IV.A of Pretrial Order No. 3. Counsel respectfully requests 

that all notices, correspondence, filings and other papers in the Master Docket of MDL 2885 

be served upon him at the address listed below.

This the 23rd day of January, 2023.

Respectfully submitted, 

WILLIAMS McDANIEL, PLLC

By: /s/ Steve N. Snyder 

Steve N. Snyder (#025703)

717 S. White Station Road, Suite 1

Memphis, Tennessee 38117

(901) 766-0887 (Phone)

(901) 766-0915 (Facsimile)

ssnyder@williamsmcdaniel.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3638 Filed 01/23/23 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 23rd day of January, 2023, a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of Court and served using the CM/ECF 

system.

/s/ Steve N. Snyder

Steve N. Snyder

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3638 Filed 01/23/23 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MagnaChip Semiconductor LLC (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 2, 2006, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sang Park, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/ Sang Park                        
|Sang Park                            
|Chief Executive Officer and President
|August 14, 2006                      

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 32.2** **CERTIFICATION    OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Commercial    Lines Inc. (the “Company”) on    Form 10-Q    for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the    Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the    “Report”), I, Christopher A. Black, Chief    Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to    18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to    § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    result of operations of the Company. /s/  Christopher    A. Black    Christopher A. Black    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer     August 7, 2007
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 4.5  


 
 

Schedule 1 to Exhibit 4.4
  Individual Deviations from Standard MTIP Invitation Letter to
  Members of the Management Board(1)    
    



	Name
 
	 	Maximum Incentive Amount (€)

for MTIP Tranche 2004
	 	 
	 
	Kai-Uwe Ricke	 	750,000	 	 	 
	Dr. Karl-Gerhard Eick	 	562,500	 	 	 
	Dr. Heinz Klinkhammer	 	450,000	 	 	 
	René Obermann	 	450,000	 	 	 
	Konrad F. Reiss	 	450,000	 	 	 
	Walter Raizner	 	406,250

  pro rata, starting

  Nov. 1, 2004	  (participating

)	 	 







	(1)
	Thomas Holtrop and Josef Brauner resigned in 2004. 



Maximum incentive amounts can only be reached if both 2004 plan targets are met. Amounts are payable in early 2007, according to the MTIP terms and
conditions. Actual amounts accrued for 2004 to be found in Item 6. See Exhibits 4.3 and 4.4 for further details.  











QuickLinks


Schedule 1 to Exhibit 4.4 Individual Deviations from Standard MTIP Invitation Letter to Members of the Management Board(1)
49–008 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 109–496 

WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 4939, EMERGENCY SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRATIONS ACT 

FOR DEFENSE, THE GLOBAL WAR ON TERROR, AND HURRICANE RECOVERY, 2006 

JUNE 9, 2006.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. COLE, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 857] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 857, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives all points of order against the conference 

report to accompany H.R. 4939, the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Hurricane Recovery, 2006, and against its consideration. The rule further provides that the conference report shall be considered as 

read. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The waiver of all points of order against consideration of the conference report includes a waiver of clause 8 of rule XXII (requiring 

a three-day layover of conference reports and the accompanying 

joint explanatory statement), which is necessary because the conference report (H. Rept. 109–494) was not filed until the legislative 

day of Thursday, June 8, 2006, and the conference report may be 

considered by the House as early as the legislative day of Monday, 

June 12, 2006. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMRPT
#### § 29.3608 Rule 7.

Any lot of tobacco which meets the specifications of two grades shall be placed in the higher grade. Any lot of tobacco on the marginal line between two grades shall be placed in the lower grade.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

144 

CA 10-00139 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

 

IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT SILLS AND AUDREY 

ELAINE SILLS, AS CO-EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE 

OF ANGELINE V. SILLS, DECEASED, 

PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS,

 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

FLEET NATIONAL BANK, JOAN ROYSTON AND 

KIRK RICHARDSON, RESPONDENTS-RESPONDENTS. 

------------------------------------------- 

AUDREY PATRONE PEARTREE, GUARDIAN AD LITEM, 

RESPONDENT. 

------------------------------------------- 

ROBERT SILLS AND AUDREY ELAINE SILLS, AS 

CO-EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF ANGELINE V. 

SILLS, DECEASED, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

V

 

FLEET BANK AND JOAN ROYSTON, 

DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. 

------------------------------------------- 

AUDREY PATRONE PEARTREE, GUARDIAN AD LITEM, 

RESPONDENT. 

------------------------------------------- 

ROBERT SILLS AND AUDREY ELAINE SILLS, AS 

CO-EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF ANGELINE V. 

SILLS, DECEASED, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

V

 

JOAN ROYSTON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. 

------------------------------------------- 

AUDREY PATRONE PEARTREE, GUARDIAN AD LITEM, 

RESPONDENT. 

(APPEAL NO. 5.) 

 

GATES & ADAMS, P.C., ROCHESTER (MICHAEL STEINBERG OF COUNSEL), FOR

PETITIONERS-APPELLANTS AND PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS. 

MCDONOUGH & ARTZ, P.C., BINGHAMTON (PHILIP J. ARTZ OF COUNSEL), FOR

RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT AND DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT JOAN ROYSTON. 

THE WOLFORD LAW FIRM LLP, ROCHESTER (ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD OF COUNSEL),

FOR RESPONDENT.
-2- 144 

CA 10-00139 

UNDERBERG & KESSLER LLP, ROCHESTER (PAUL V. NUNES OF COUNSEL), FOR

RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT FLEET NATIONAL BANK AND DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT

FLEET BANK.

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Steuben County (Peter

C. Bradstreet, A.J.), entered December 31, 2009. The order granted

the application of Audrey Patrone Peartree, as guardian ad litem for

decedent Angeline V. Sills, to retain Elizabeth A. Wolford as counsel

to represent her in an appeal of the court’s decision and order dated

September 10, 2009, and ordered that all reasonable fees and

disbursements incurred by the guardian ad litem in that appeal be paid

for by the Estate of Angeline V. Sills. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously vacated without costs and the matter is remitted to

Supreme Court, Steuben County, for further proceedings in accordance

with the same Memorandum as in Sills v Fleet Natl. Bank ([appeal No.

1] ___ AD3d ___ [Feb. 18, 2011]). 

Entered: February 18, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court
§ 1740.61 Evaluation for technical and financial feasibility. ( a ) A project is financially feasible when the applicant demonstrates to the satisfaction of RUS that it will be able to generate sufficient revenues to cover expenses; will have sufficient cash flow to service all debts and obligations as they come due; will have a positive ending cash balance as reflected on the cash flow statement for each year of the forecast period; and, by the end of the forecast period, will meet at least two of the following requirements: A minimum TIER requirement of 1.2, a minimum DSCR requirement of 1.2, and a minimum current ratio of 1.2. In addition, applicants must demonstrate positive cash flow from operations at the end of the forecast period.
( b ) For any funding option that includes grant funds, evaluation criteria for scoring the application will be included in the Federal Register notice that opens an application window. Grant applications submitted for a certain category will be ranked and awarded based only on those applications included in that category.
( c ) The Agency will determine technical feasibility by evaluating the Applicant's network design and other relevant information in the application.
Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO. 4:02cr45-SPM

THYRON CORNELL RICHARDSON, 

 

Defendant.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Defendant proposed to enter a guilty plea to Count One of this indictment. The

district judge referred this matter to me for purposes of hearing Defendant's proposed

change of plea pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11 and to enter a report and recommendation

as to whether to accept the change of plea. All parties consented to this procedure, and

the written consent has been entered. After hearing, it is found that:

1. Defendant understands the nature of the charge or charges as to which the

plea is offered.

2. Defendant understands the right to trial by jury, to persist in a plea of not

guilty, to assistance of counsel at trial, and to confront and cross examine adverse

witnesses, and understands the right against compelled self-incrimination.

3. Defendant understands the maximum possible sentence if the guilty plea is

accepted, including the effect of a supervised release term, understands that the
Page 2 of 3

Case No. 4:02cr45-SPM

sentencing guidelines are advisory, and understands that the court has discretion to

depart from those guidelines and sentence up to the statutory maximum sentence.

4. The plea of guilty by the Defendant has been knowingly and voluntarily made,

and is not the result of force or threats, or of promises except for promises contained in

the written plea agreement between the parties.

5. Defendant is competent to plead guilty.

6. Defendant understands that answers given by the Defendant during the plea

colloquy, which were under oath, may be later used against the Defendant in

prosecution for perjury or false statement.

7. There is a factual basis for Defendant's guilty plea.

8. There is a plea agreement which should be accepted by the court. Defendant

understands the terms of the plea agreement.

9. Defendant has voluntarily consented to go forward with this plea of guilty

before me. Defendant knowingly and voluntarily has waived the ten day period for filing

objections to this report and recommendation, and agrees that written objections, if any,

must be filed within twenty-four hours from receipt of a copy of this report and

recommendation. The United States also consents to this procedure, including the

shorter period for objections.
Page 3 of 3

Case No. 4:02cr45-SPM

Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that the court ACCEPT the plea agreement

and defendant's plea of guilty.

IN CHAMBERS at Tallahassee, Florida, on August 7, 2008. 

s/ William C. Sherrill, Jr. 

WILLIAM C. SHERRILL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 24 hours after receiving a copy of this report and

recommendation.
CERTIFICATION OF KEVIN J. MCANDREW AS CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
              SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13A-14


I, Kevin J. McAndrew, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this yearly report on Form 10-K of Canterbury
Consulting Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this yearly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this yearly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this yearly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this yearly
report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for
the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this yearly report is
being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
yearly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this yearly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of
the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

6. I have indicated in this yearly report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: March 7, 2003

               /s/Kevin J. McAndrew
               Kevin J. McAndrew
               Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Lightwave Logic, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James S. Marcelli, Chief Executive Officer of our Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of our Company.

|                         |  |                              
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------------
|Date:  November 15, 2010 |  | /s/James S. Marcelli         
|                         |  | James S. Marcelli            
|                         |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                         |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
§ 248.7 Nondiscrimination. ( a ) *Civil rights requirements.* The State agency shall comply with the requirements of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, Department of Agriculture regulations on nondiscrimination (7 CFR parts 15, 15a and 15b), and applicable FNS Instructions to ensure that no person shall, on the grounds of race, color, national origin, age, sex or handicap, be excluded from participation, be denied benefits, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination, under the FMNP. Because racial and ethnic participation data (as required by title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) are collected at the time women, infants, and children are certified for participation in the WIC Program, the Department has determined that the WIC data collection effort is sufficient to fulfill the racial/ethnic data collection requirement for the FMNP. Therefore, no additional data collection is required. Compliance with title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, and regulations and instructions issued thereunder shall include, but not be limited to: ( 1 ) Notification to the public of the nondiscrimination policy and complaint rights of recipients and potentially eligible persons, which may be satisfied through the Department's required nondiscrimination statement on brochures and publications;
( 2 ) Review and monitoring activity to ensure FMNP compliance with the nondiscrimination laws and regulations;
( 3 ) Establishment of grievance procedures for handling recipient complaints based on sex and handicap.
( b ) *Complaints.* Persons seeking to file discrimination complaints may file them either with the Secretary of Agriculture, or the Director, USDA, Office of Adjudication and Compliance, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-9410 (or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY)), or with the office established by the State agency to handle discrimination grievances or complaints. All complaints received by State agencies which allege discrimination based on race, color, national origin, or age shall be referred to the Secretary of Agriculture or the Director of the Office of Equal Opportunity, USDA. A State agency may process complaints which allege discrimination based on sex or handicap if grievance procedures are in place.
[59 FR 11517, Mar. 11, 1994, as amended at 73 FR 65249, Nov. 3, 2008]
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2340 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2340

 To amend title 23, United States Code, to protect States that have in 
effect laws or orders with respect to pay to play reform, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 12, 2013

Mr. Quigley (for himself, Mr. Foster, and Ms. Duckworth) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 
                           and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 23, United States Code, to protect States that have in 
effect laws or orders with respect to pay to play reform, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``State Ethics Law Protection Act of 
2013''.

SEC. 2. PAY TO PLAY REFORM.

    Section 112 of title 23, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(h) Pay To Play Reform.--A State transportation department shall 
not be considered to have violated a requirement of this section solely 
because the State in which that State transportation department is 
located, or a local government within that State, has in effect a law 
or an order that limits the amount of money an individual or entity 
that is doing business with a State or local agency with respect to a 
Federal-aid highway project may contribute to a political party, 
campaign, candidate, or elected official.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT
10.2
 EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO
AMENDED REVOLVING CREDIT AGREEMENT
 Agreement Parent Alon LP Borrower Borrowers Guarantor Company Guarantor Companies Agent Bank Leumi
 W I T N E S S E T H
 Lender Lenders Credit Agreement
   Definitions
 Amendments to Credit Agreement
 Financial Covenant  Funded Debt to EBITDA




---



##### 



Funded Debt to EBITDA provided
  Financial Covenant  Interest Coverage Ratio
 Interest Coverage Ratio Interest
Coverage Ratio provided
 Conditions to Effectiveness Eighth
Amendment Date
   Eighth Amendment Fee Letter
 - 2 -




---



##### 



Representations and Warranties
 Reservation of Rights
 Continued Effectiveness of Loan Documents
 Miscellaneous
 - 3 -




---



##### 



- 4 -




---



##### 



Borrower:ALON USA, LPBy:
    Alon USA GP, LLC, a Delaware limitedliability company, its general partnerBy:
    /s/ Shai EvenName:
    Shai EvenTitle:
    Senior Vice President and Chief

Financial Officer




---



##### 



Guarantor Companies:
ALON USA OPERATING, INC
ALON USA REFINING, INC.
ALON USA, INC.
ALON USA ENERGY, INC.
ALON PARAMOUNT HOLDINGS, INC.
ALON USA GP, LLC
ALON ASSETS, INC.By:
    /s/ Shai EvenName:
    Shai EvenTitle:
    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
OfficerALON USA CAPITAL, INC.By:
    /s/ Harlin DeanName:
    Harlin DeanTitle:
    Vice President and SecretaryALON CRUDE PIPELINE, LLCBy:
    /s/ Shai EvenName:
    Shai EvenTitle:
    Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




---



##### 



ALON BRANDS, INC.
ALON USA DELAWARE, LLC
ALON PIPELINE LOGISTICS, LLCBy:
    /s/ Shai EvenName:
    Shai EvenTitle:
    Vice President




---



##### 



Agent and Lender:
ISRAEL DISCOUNT BANK OF NEW YORKBy:
    /s/ Amir BarashName:
    Amir BarashTitle:
    SVPBy:
    /s/ Mali GolanName:
    Mali GolanTitle:
    Assistant VP




---



##### 



Lender and Co-arranger:
BANK LEUMI USABy:
    /s/ Gil HershmanName:
    Gil HershmanTitle:
    VPBy:
    /s/ Noam KatzName:
    Noam KatzTitle:
    BO