alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 6 , 2020 

# Order

Clerk March 6 , 2020

1 60 183 ( 41 )

ORAS TAYLOR, Personal Representative

of the ESTATE OF EFFIE TAYLOR,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

SC: 160183

v COA: 338801

Oakland CC: 2015

- 147003

- NH

UNIVERSITY PHYSICIAN GROUP, LEGACY

SHGD, VHS SINAI GRACE HOSPITAL, INC.,

TENET HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, VHS

OF MICHIGAN, IN C., VHS PHYSICIANS OF

MICHIGAN, DMC LAHSER AMBULATORY,

and DMC LAHSER CAMPUS,

Defendants

and

FRANKLIN MEDICAL CONSULTANTS, PC,

and MANUEL SKLAR,

Defendants

- Appellants

.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the Michigan State Medical Society to

file a brief amicus curiae is GRANTED. The revised amicus brief submitted on March 3,

2020, is accepted for filing.
#### Virginia M. Kerr, administratrix of the estate of Joseph R. Kerr, deceased, plaintiff in error, v. Frank J. McKee and National Shippers and Movers, Inc., defendants in error.

Gen. No. 37,206.

Opinion filed October 16, 1934.

William R. Peacock, for plaintiff in error. Sitron & Schwartz, for defendants in error; Benjamin Robert Cohen, of counsel.

Mr. Presiding Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-2963
In Re: CHRIS J. EUBANKS, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-95-117) Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: January 31, 1996 Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Chris J. Eubanks, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Chris J. Eubanks petitions this court for a writ of mandamuspursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 21, requesting that we direct a district court judge to enter a default judgment against the Defendants in Eubanks's pending civil rights action. Mandamus is an extraordinary writ that should be granted only in unusual circumstances not present here. Kerr v. United States District Court , 426 U.S. 394 (1976). Further, it cannot be used as a substitute for appeal. In re United Steelworkers , 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir. 1979). Accordingly, we deny Eubanks's petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
#### § 28.601 Official cotton standards for fiber fineness and maturity.

The official cotton standards of the United States for fiber fineness and maturity shall be the measure of such qualities, in combination, provided by air flow instrument tests in terms of micronaire readings in accordance with the procedure specified in § 28.603.
#### Joe A. BROWDER, Jr., Claimant-Appellant, v. R. James NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 2007-7197.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

May 22, 2007.

*ORDER*

Joe A. Browder, Jr. submits correspondence stating that the submission that was *1000treated as a notice of appeal by the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in *Browder v. Nicholson,*No. 07-0338, 2007 WL 956934 (Vet.App.) did not seek appellate review of that court’s decision. We treat Browder’s submission as a motion to voluntarily dismiss his appeal.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion to dismiss is granted.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-78,004-01

EX PARTE ADAM RAY CAICEDO, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 0802114-A IN THE 371ST DISTRICT COURT

FROM TARRANT COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated

robbery and sentenced to twenty-five years’ imprisonment. The Second Court of Appeals affirmed

his conviction. Caicedo v. State, No. 02-02-00017-CR (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Mar. 20, 2003) (not

designated for publication). 

Applicant contends that trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance at his punishment

hearing. After holding evidentiary hearings, the trial court determined that trial counsel’s conduct
2

was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. It recommended that we grant Applicant a new

punishment hearing. Relief is granted. The sentence in cause number 0802114D in the 371st

District Court of Tarrant County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff

of Tarrant County for a new punishment hearing. The trial court shall issue any necessary bench

warrant within 10 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: September 16, 2015

Do not publish
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2167 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2167

    To authorize the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to 
  establish additional requirements to improve the fiscal safety and 
  soundness of the home equity conversion mortgage insurance program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2013

Mr. Heck of Washington (for himself and Mr. Fitzpatrick) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To authorize the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to 
  establish additional requirements to improve the fiscal safety and 
  soundness of the home equity conversion mortgage insurance program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reverse Mortgage Stabilization Act 
of 2013''.

SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL SAFETY AND SOUNDNESS REQUIREMENTS FOR HOME EQUITY 
              CONVERSION MORTGAGE INSURANCE PROGRAM.

    Subsection (h) of section 255 of the National Housing Act (12 
U.S.C. 1715z-20(h)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) establish, by notice or mortgagee letter, any 
        additional or alternative requirements that the Secretary, in 
        the Secretary's discretion, determines are necessary to improve 
        the fiscal safety and soundness of the program authorized by 
        this section, which requirements shall take effect upon 
        issuance.''.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Frank P. Filipps, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of Clayton Holdings, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) [Paragraphomitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained in SEC ReleaseNo. 34-47986];

 

(c) Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

 

(d) Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| Date: May 15, 2006 |                      |
|-------------------------|---------------------------|
|                    | /s/ Frank P. Filipps      |
|                    | Frank P. Filipps          |
| * *                | *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
§ 28.161 Disputes involving contracts for shipment of cotton from United States. When an association or exchange located in a country other than the United States shall adopt any of the official cotton standards of the United States and when the members of the committee of such association or exchange having final jurisdiction in the matter of appeals have been designated as cotton examiners by the Director, such committee may be constituted for the purposes of this act a Board of the Department and authorized to act as follows: ( a ) Insofar as the exchange has adopted the universal standards the committee may pass upon the classification of cotton involved in a dispute between a party in the United States and a party without the United States to a contract made under the rules of the association or exchange.
( b ) The submission of samples of cotton involved in such a dispute to such association or exchange or such committee in accordance with the rules of the association or exchange shall be deemed to be a submission to the Department.
( c ) Determinations of classification made by the boards so constituted shall be final. When so provided in the articles, rules, or bylaws of the association or exchange, such determinations may be evidenced by awards. If an award is made which does not state the classification, such board will, upon request of the owner or custodian of the cotton and the payment of a reasonable additional fee, issue a certificate showing in detail the true classification for grade and color of such cotton, based upon a comparison of the samples with the universal standards or with a type or other samples on which the cotton has been sold, as the case may be.
July 29, 2013

Mr. Dennis DeVany Montana Department ofTransportation Aeronautics Division

2630 Airport Road

PO Box 200507 Helena MT59620-0507

Chief, Essential Air Service Division, X-53 Office ofAviation Analysis United States DepartmentofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590 Subject: EAS Carrier Selection, DOT-OST-1997-2605 Dear Mr. DeVany, Michael T. Tooley, Director Steve Bullock, Governor

The Montana.Department of Transportation (MDT) is pleased to offer the following comments relative to the selection of an Essential Air Service (EAS) air carrier at Glasgow, Glendive, Havre, Sidney and.WolfPoint, Montanafor atwo-yearperiod. Montana is encouraged to see competition in this market, thus fostering healthy promotion of services from all interested air carriers and ultimately resulting in better service to the communities. MDT supports the proposal from Cape Air Option A and the recommendation of the MontanaEssential Air Service Task Force to select Cape Air for atwo-year period. MDT is proud ofour partnership with these north central Montana communities and the U.S Department of Transportation and appreciate the opportunity to comment on this important selectionprocess. 

# fi1etdu

Mike Tooley 

# r{!jDirector
cc: John Rabenberg, Chairman, Essential Air Servicy TaskForce ·DebbieAlke, Administrator, MDT Aeronautjcs Division

An Equal OpportunityEmployer
§ 248.11 Financial management system. ( a ) *Disclosure of expenditures.* The State agency shall maintain a financial management system which provides accurate, current and complete disclosure of the financial status of the FMNP. This shall include an accounting for all property and other assets and all FMNP funds received and expended each fiscal year.
( b ) *Internal controls.* The State agency shall maintain effective controls over and accountability for all FMNP funds. The State agency must have effective internal controls to ensure that expenditures financed with FMNP funds are authorized and properly chargeable to the FMNP.
( c ) *Record of expenditures.* The State agency shall maintain records which adequately identify the source and use of funds expended for FMNP activities. These records shall contain, but are not limited to, information pertaining to authorization, receipt of funds, obligations, unobligated balances, assets, liabilities, outlays, and income.
( d ) *Payment of costs.* The State agency shall implement procedures which ensure prompt and accurate payment of allowable costs, and ensure the allowability and allocability of costs in accordance with the cost principles and standard provisions of this part, 2 CFR part 200, subparts D and E and USDA implementing regulations 2 CFR part 400 and part 415, and FNS guidelines and Instructions.
( e ) *Identification of obligated funds.* The State agency shall implement procedures which accurately identify obligated FMNP funds at the time the obligations are made.
( f ) *Resolution of audit findings.* The State agency shall implement procedures which ensure timely and appropriate resolution of claims and other matters resulting from audit findings and recommendations.
( g ) *Reconciliation of food instruments.* The State agency shall reconcile FMNP coupons in accordance with § 248.10(h).
( h ) *Transfer of cash.* The State agency shall establish the timing and amounts of its cash draws against its Letter of Credit in accordance with 31 CFR part 205.
[59 FR 11517, Mar. 11, 1994, as amended at 60 FR 49747, Sept. 27, 1995; 81 FR 66496, Sept. 28, 2016]
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2238 

To amend the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 

to exempt the Crime Victims Fund from sequestration. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 4, 2013 

Mr. COSTA (for himself and Mr. POE of Texas) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Budget 

A BILL 

To amend the Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 to exempt the Crime Victims Fund 

from sequestration. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXEMPTION FROM SEQUESTRATION. 

4 Subsection (g)(1)(A) of section 255 of the Balanced 

5 Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 is 

6 amended by inserting after the item relating to Continuing 

7 Fund, Southwestern Power Administration (the second 

8 place it appears) the following new item: 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2238 IH

1 ‘‘Crime Victims Fund (15–5041–0–2– 

2 754).’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### § 29.6017 General quality.

The quality of tobacco considered in relation to the type as a whole. General quality is distinguished from the restricted use of the term “quality” within a group.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**AFFINITY GROUP HOLDING, INC.**

 

**STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

I, Michael A. Schneider, President and Chief Executive Officer ofAffinity Group Holding, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),hereby certify as follows:

 

1.                                       This statement is provided pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350 in connection with the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 (the “Periodic Report”);

 

2.                                       The Periodic Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

3.                                       The information contained in the PeriodicReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company as of dates and for the periods indicatedtherein.

 

 
| Date: May 4, 2005 |                                  |
|------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                   |                                  |
|                   | /s/ Michael A. Schneider              |   |
|                   | Michael A. Schneider                  |
|                   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, or suchother document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thewritten statement as required by Section 906, has been provided toAffinity Group Holding, Inc. and will be retained by Affinity GroupHolding, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.

 

----
Editorial Note on Subchapter C of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter C appear by Amdt. 381, 65 FR 64586, Oct. 30, 2000.

Editorial Note on Part 278
Editorial Note: OMB control numbers relating to this part 278 are contained in § 271.8.

§ 278.3 Participation of wholesale food concerns. ( a ) *Accepting coupons.* An authorized wholesale food concern may accept endorsed coupons from one or more specified authorized retail food stores, from one or more specified authorized nonprofit cooperative food-purchasing ventures, from one or more specified authorized group living arrangements, from one or more specified authorized drug addict or alcoholic treatment programs, from one or more specified authorized shelters for battered women and children, or, from one or more specified public or private nonprofit homeless meal providers if the coupons are accompanied by a properly filled-out and signed redemption certificate, and are not marked “paid,” “canceled,” or “specimen.” A wholesaler authorized to accept coupons from an authorized drug addict or alcoholic treatment program, or from an authorized group living arrangement, or from an authorized shelter for battered women and children, or from one or more public or private nonprofit homeless meal providers may accept coupons from that treatment program, or group living arrangement, or shelter for battered women and children, or from one or more public or private nonprofit homeless meal providers, only in exchange for food.
( b ) *Accepting legally obtained coupons.* No authorized wholesale food concern may accept coupons if the wholesaler knows or has reasonable cause to believe that the coupons were not legally obtained for eligible food.
( c ) *Redeeming coupons.* An authorized wholesale food concern may redeem coupons, properly accepted from retailers, through the banking system, upon presentation of the coupons with: ( 1 ) The authorized retail food store's properly filled-out and signed redemption certificate for the coupons; and
( 2 ) The authorized wholesale food concern's properly filled-out and signed redemption certificate.
( d ) *Handling retailer redemption certificates.* No authorized wholesale food concern may alter, prepare, or complete an authorized retail food store's redemption certificate.
[Amdt. 136, 43 FR 43274, Sept. 22, 1978, as amended by Amdt. 173, 46 FR 62810, Dec. 29, 1981; Amdt. 286, 52 FR 7558, Mar. 11, 1987; Amdt. 344, 56 FR 54778, Oct. 23, 1991; Amdt. 343, 61 FR 53601, Oct. 15, 1996]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Rene Rodriguez, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered on July 10, 1979, unanimously affirmed. Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. (See *Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Birns, Markewich and Silverman, JJ.
#### § 201.71 Establishing the source of all classes of certified seed.

The certifying agency shall have evidence of the class and source of seed used to plant each crop being considered for certification.

[38 FR 25662, Sept. 14, 1973]
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2049 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2049

To ensure that all of Brevard County, Florida, is treated as a HUBZone, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 17, 2013

  Mr. Posey introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Small Business

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To ensure that all of Brevard County, Florida, is treated as a HUBZone, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Shuttle Workforce Revitalization Act 
of 2013''.

SEC. 2. BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA.

    (a) In General.--During the covered period, any portion of Brevard 
County, Florida, that is not otherwise a HUBZone, as such term is 
defined under section 3(p) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 
632(p)), shall be treated as a HUBZone for purposes of that Act.
    (b) Covered Period Defined.--In this section, the term ``covered 
period'' means the period beginning on the date of enactment of this 
Act and ending on January 1, 2020.
                                 <all>
```