alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT  I, E. F. H.
Roberts, certify that:  1.I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Petro-Canada;  2.Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report;  4.The
issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:  a)designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;  b)evaluated
the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and  c)disclosed
in this report any change in the issuers internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report  that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuers internal control over
financial reporting; and  5.The
issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuers
auditors and the audit committee of the issuers board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):  a)all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to  adversely affect the issuers ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the issuers control over financial reporting.  Date:  March 25, 2004/s/ E. F. H.
  RobertsE. F. H.
  RobertsSenior
  Vice-President and
  Chief Financial Officer
H. R. 1707 

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 302 East 

Green Street in Champaign, Illinois, as the ‘‘James R. Burgess Jr. Post Office 

Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. JAMES R. BURGESS JR. POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 302 East Green Street in Champaign, Illinois, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘James R. Burgess Jr. Post 

Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘James R. Burgess Jr. Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit 10.3



ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN 



        The
Company maintains an annual incentive plan whereby certain employees are eligible to
receive cash bonuses equal to a percentage of their base salaries if certain corporate
financial objectives are achieved. The employees selected each year to participate in the
annual incentive plan, as well as the performance targets on which the cash bonuses are
based and the amount of the cash bonuses are determined each year in the discretion of the
Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company. 



        Employees
in the following categories are eligible to participate in the plan: members of the senior
management team and other employees who can have a significant impact on the financial
results of the Company. Each year, the Chief Executive Officer recommends to the
Compensation Committee the employees whom he believes should participate in the plan, and
the final determination is made by the Compensation Committee. The participation of such
employees in the plan is evidenced by written notice from the Company. 



        If
the Company achieves the performance targets set by the Compensation Committee, the
designated management employees receive specified percentages of their annual salaries in
the form of cash bonuses. Company performance below the target levels will result in lower
or no bonus payments, and Company performance above the target levels will result in
higher bonus payments.
MEDIATION REFERRALS

2006-0492.

#### Dayton-Montgomery Cty. Port Auth. v. Montgomery Cty. Bd. of Revision.

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2004-A-1227.

The following case has been returned to the regular docket pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(6)(E):
#### § 29.125 Charge for appeals.

A charge of $5 shall be made for each appeal filed under § 29.90 and the fee for an appeal inspection, sampling, or weighing shall equal the fee for the original inspection, sampling, or weighing from which the appeal is taken, plus any charges for travel or other expenses incurred in hearing the appeal: *Provided,* That when a material error in the certificate or sample from which the appeal is taken is found by the appeal inspector the charge and fee shall be waived.

[13 FR 9474, Dec. 31, 1948; 19 FR 57, Jan. 6, 1954, as amended at 46 FR 62394, Dec. 24, 1981]
#### Aaron Frosch, as Executor of Marilyn Monroe, Deceased, Appellant, v Grosset & Dunlap, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered March 23, 1979, granting motions of defendants for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, is unanimously affirmed, with costs. Plaintiff, executor of the estate of the famous film actress Marilyn Monroe, sues to recover damages for invasion of the "right of publicity” alleged to adhere in the decedent’s name, personality, photographs, etc. Plaintiff claims that this right of publicity is infringed by the publication of a book entitled "Marilyn,” written by defendant Norman Mailer and published by defendant publishers. The book was written and published some years after the death of Marilyn Monroe. The statutory right of privacy applies to the name, portrait or picture of "any living person” (Civil Rights Law, § 50); and it is thus on its face not applicable to the present book. Plaintiff, however, claims that there is an additional property right, a right of publicity which survives the death of Miss Monroe and belongs to the estate. No such nonstatutory right has yet been recognized by the New York State courts (cf. *Wojtowicz v Delacorte Press,*43 NY2d 858). The cases on the point in other courts have taken varying positions (cf. *Factors Etc., Inc. v Pro Arts,*579 F2d 215; *Lugosi v Universal Pictures,*25 Cal 3d 813; *Guglielmi v Spelling-Goldberg Prods., 25*Cal 3d 860). Special Term held that the book here involved is what it purports to *769be, a biography, and as such did not give rise to a cause of action in favor of the estate for violation of a right of publicity. Plaintiff disputes the characterization of the book as a biography. We think it does not matter whether the book is properly described as a biography, a fictional biography, or any other kind of literary work. It is not for a court to pass on literary categories, or literary judgment. It is enough that the book is a literary work and not simply a disguised commercial advertisement for the sale of goods or services. The protection of the right of free expression is so important that we should not extend any right of publicity, if such exists, to give rise to a cause of action against the publication of a literary work about a deceased person. Concur—Birns, J. P., Sandler, Sullivan, Ross and Silver-man, JJ.
#### Leopold J. Dryszczak, Appellant, v Wincentyna M. Dryszczak, Respondent.

Supreme Court, New York County, entered November 1, 1979, awarding defendant wife temporary alimony in the amount of $100 per week, is unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, to reduce the temporary alimony to $75 per week. In the light of the brevity of the marriage and the relative income and circumstances of the parties, we think that based on the limited information available on affidavits, the $75 per week is a more appropriate *temporary alimony*than the $100 per week awarded by Special Term. We emphasize that our present determination is in no sense to be deemed a guideline as to the amount to be awarded after trial and an opportunity for cross-examination and fuller examination of the facts. We repeat what we have often said, that the best remedy for a party dissatisfied with a temporary alimony award is to move the case to an early trial. Concur— Fein, J. P., Sullivan, Lupiano, Silverman and Bloom, JJ.
** **

**Exhibit31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I,Frank P. Filipps, certify that:

1. Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Clayton Holdings,Inc.;

2.      Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3.      Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

4.      The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [Paragraph omitted inaccordance with SEC transition instructions contained in SEC Release No.34-47986];

(c) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.      The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

(b) Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: August 14, 2006 |     |                      |
|-----------------------|----------|---------------------------|
|                  |     | /s/ Frank P. Filipps      |
|                  |     | Frank P. Filipps          |
|                  | * * | *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (i)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Dated: May 12, 2008
    /s/ Richard R. WoolcottRichard R. WoolcottPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)Dated: May 12, 2008
    /s/ Douglas P. CollierDouglas P. CollierChief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
**EXHIBIT      32(a)**

| 1) |   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2) |   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Registrant. |
|----|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                 |   |   |
|------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|  /s/              Michael J. Quillen            |   |
|                  Michael J. Quillen             |   |   |
| President                and Chief Executive Officer |   |   |
| (Principal                Executive Officer)         |   |   |
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 8, 2015

No. 04-14-00814-CR

Jacob Randall SONGER,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13-272-CR

Honorable Bill R. Palmer, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. The 

Appellant’s brief is due August 10, 2015.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 8th day of July, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 224 (Monday, November 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 71141]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29279]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Geological Survey


Announcement of National Geospatial Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: U.S. Geological Survey, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Geospatial Advisory Committee (NGAC) will meet on 
December 7-8, 2010 at the American Institute of Architects Building, 
1735 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20006. The meeting will be 
held in the Gallery Room. The NGAC, which is composed of 
representatives from governmental, private sector, non-profit, and 
academic organizations, was established to advise the Federal 
Geographic Data Committee on management of Federal geospatial programs, 
the development of the National Spatial Data Infrastructure, and the 
implementation of Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-16. 
Topics to be addressed at the meeting include:

    --Geospatial Platform
    --Geospatial Workforce
    --The National Map
    --FGDC Update
    --Geospatial Program Updates
    --NGAC Subcommittee Reports

The meeting will include an opportunity for public comment on December 
8. Comments may also be submitted to the NGAC in writing. Members of 
the public who wish to attend the meeting must register in advance. 
Please register by contacting Arista Maher at the U.S. Geological 
Survey (703-648-6283, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#50313d3138352210252337237e373f26"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="79181418111c0b390c0a1e0a571e160f">[email protected]</span></a>). Registrations are due by 
December 3, 2010. While the meeting will be open to the public, seating 
may be limited due to room capacity.

DATES: The meeting will be held from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. on December 7 
and from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m. on December 8.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Mahoney, U.S. Geological Survey 
(206-220-4621).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Meetings of the National Geospatial Advisory 
Committee are open to the public. Additional information about the NGAC 
and the meeting is available at http://www.fgdc.gov/ngac.

    Dated: November 16, 2010.
Ken Shaffer,
Deputy Executive Director, Federal Geographic Data Committee.
[FR Doc. 2010-29279 Filed 11-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4311-AM-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

Certification of Principal Financial OfficerPursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the “Report”) of ATS Corporation(the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof, I, Pamela A. Little, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,hereby certify that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Registrant.

 
| Date: May 12, 2008 |       | By:        |   | /s/ Pamela A. Little               |
|-------------------------|------------|------------|--------|------------------------------------|
|                    | ** ** | ** ** |   | **Pamela  A. Little**              |
|                    | ** ** | ** ** |   | **Chief  Financial Officer**       |
|                    | ** ** | ** ** |   | **(Principal  Financial Officer)** |

 

----
EXHIBIT 12

                        UNUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES




                                                  Year Ended December 31,
                                                ----------------------------
(Dollars in millions)                           1998       1997         1996
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Earnings:
Income before income taxes                    $517.4      $536.4       $341.6
Add:  Fixed charges                             59.8        53.4         52.2
                                              ------      ------      -------
Earnings as adjusted                          $577.2      $589.8       $393.8
=============================================================================


Fixed charges:
   Interest expense                          $  49.9     $  42.4      $  40.7
    Interest portion of rent expense             9.9        11.0         11.5
                                              ------      -------        ----
Total fixed charges                          $  59.8     $  53.4      $  52.2
=============================================================================

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges               9.7        11.0         7.5
============================================================================


For purposes of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, earnings as
adjusted consist of income before income taxes plus fixed charges. Fixed charges
consist of interest expense and the estimated interest portion of rent expense.
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS

*June 15, 2006*

[Cite as *06/15/2006 Case Announcements,*2006-Ohio-2997.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2005-0150.

#### Lewis v. J. E. Wiggins & Co.

Franklin App. No. 04AP-469, 04AP-544, and 04AP-668, 2004-Ohio-6724. This cause came on for further consideration of appellant’s motion for leave to file a motion to vacate judgment for attorney-fees and the motion to vacate judgment for attorney fees. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that that the motions are denied.
### Atrazine in Surface Water and Relation to Hydrologic Conditions Within the Delaware River Basin Pesticide Management Area, Northeast Kansas, July 1992 Through December 1994

By: Larry M. Pope

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/fs19695

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (26.8 kB pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Figures:                               - **Figure 1**                            (67.3 kB pdf)                        
  - **Figure 2**                            (43.4 kB pdf)                        
  - **Figure 3**                            (44.0 kB pdf)                        
  - **Figure 4**                            (30.3 kB pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

**For additional information, contact:**
Director, Kansas Water Science CenterU.S. Geological Survey1217 Biltmore DriveLawrence, KS 66049

#### Suggested Citation

Pope, L.M., 1995, Atrazine in surface water and relation to hydrologic conditions within the Delaware River Basin Pesticide Management Area, Northeast Kansas, July 1992 through December 1994: U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 196–95, 2 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/fs19695.

ISSN: 2327-6932 (online)

#### Table of Contents

- Formation of Pesticide Management Area
- Water-Quality Monitoring and Analysis
- Monitoring Results
- Conclusions And Implications
- References

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.