alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN RE: CASES ASSIGNED TO Misc. No. 4:95mc40111
MAGISTRATE JUDGE
ALLAN KORNBLUM
ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER
United States Magistrate Judge Allan Kornblum passed away on
February 12, 2010. To effect the efficient processing of cases pending
appointment of a new magistrate judge, the following procedures will be used.

1. Cases referred to Magistrate Judge Kornblum will be handled by
the assigned district judge.

2. For administrative and case management purposes, referral of
cases to the magistrate judges will continue in accordance with existing
administrative orders. The docketing system and CMECF will continue to show
cases being referred to Magistrate Judge Kornblum, although a district judge will
be issuing all orders. Thus, for dispositive matters, final orders will be issued
directly by the district judge without a Report and Recommendation and
objections. Motion orders will be entered directly by the district judge, and thus
the process of the magistrate judge entering an order which can be appealed to

the district judge will not apply.



Page 2 of 2

3. For scheduling and other routine matters, the parties and litigants
should continue to communicate with Magistrate Judge Kornbium’s staff and
courtroom deputy.

4, Nothing in this Administrative Order shall prohibit the district judge
from making a specific referral to another magistrate judge in this district for
purposes of conducting evidentiary hearings or other such proceedings, pursuant
to Northern District of Florida Local Rule 72.3.

SO ORDERED this 10" th day of March, 2010.

SA Sisphan P. Mickle

Stephan P. Mickle
United States District Judge
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T20:43:02-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

DIRECTV INC,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:03-cv-00085-MP-AK

THOMAS E CONNOR,

BRENT DIAMOND,

THOMAS FRANCELLA,

Defendants.

___________________________/

O R D E R 

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 23, Motion to Set Aside Default Judgement by

Brent Diamond. A hearing was held in this matter on April 20, 2005. During the hearing, the

plaintiff produced the return of service on Mr. Diamond, doc. 13, which tended to prove Mr.

Diamond was served in Amherst, Ohio on August 26, 2003. Mr. Diamond, however, produced

two sworn affidavits which tended to prove that he could not have been present at the address

listed in the return of service on the date listed in the return of service. 

The question of whether Mr. Diamond was validly served goes to the heart of this Court's

personal jurisdiction over Mr. Diamond, and "[c]onsideration of affidavits and, where necessary,

the taking of testimony are appropriate means for resolving jurisdictional disputes," Edwards v.

Associated Press, 512 F.2d 258, 262 n.8 (former 5th Cir. 1975), especially when affidavits

cannot be harmonized, Coca-Cola Foods v. Empresa Comercial Internacional De Frutas S.A.,

941 F.Supp. 1175, 1178 (M.D. Fla. 1996). Accordingly, the Clerk shall set an evidentiary

hearing at which the Court will hear testimony on the issue of service of process. Counsel for

the plaintiff shall be responsible for procuring the attendance of the process server, Mr. Larry

Case 1:03-cv-00085-MP-AK Document 29 Filed 04/29/05 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 1:03-cv-00085-MP-AK

Watkins. Defendant's counsel shall be responsible for procuring the attendance of Mr. Brent

Diamond. The hearing shall be confined to solely the issue of whether process was validly

served on Mr. Diamond.

DONE AND ORDERED this 29th day of April, 2005

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:03-cv-00085-MP-AK Document 29 Filed 04/29/05 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 15.2





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-146790) and the Registration Statement on Form F-3 (File No. 333-163702) of our report dated May 26, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements of China Natural Resources, Inc. and subsidiaries (which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph describing that the Company has significant transactions and relationships with affiliated companies; an explanatory paragraph stating that in 2009, the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Newhold Investments Limited and Pineboom Investment Limited, and sold its remaining 60% interest in Mark Faith Technology Development Limited and its wholly-owned subsidiary, and in 2010, the Company sold its 45% equity interest in Guangdong Longchuan Jinshi Mining Development Co., Ltd., and acquired all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Wealthy Year Limited, which appears on page F-5 in the 2010 Annual Report on Form 20-F of China Natural Resources, Inc. and subsidiaries.





/s/ GHP Horwath, P.C.

Denver, Colorado

June 30, 2011
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter C of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter C appear by Amdt. 381, 65 FR 64586, Oct. 30, 2000.

###### Editorial Note on Part 275

#### Editorial Note:

OMB control numbers relating to this part 275 are contained in § 271.8.

#### § 275.20 ME review schedules.

(a) Each State agency shall submit its review schedule to the appropriate FNS regional office at least 60 days prior to the beginning of the next year's review period (the Federal fiscal year). These schedules must ensure that all project areas/management units will be reviewed within the required time limits. Each schedule shall identify the project areas/management units in each classification and list each project area to be reviewed by month or by quarter. A State agency may submit a request to use an alternate review schedule at any time. The alternate schedule shall not be effective until approved by FNS in accordance with § 275.5(b)(2).

(b) State agencies shall notify the appropriate FNS regional office of all changes in review schedules.

[Amdt. 266, 52 FR 3410, Feb. 4, 1987]
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2391 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 388
113th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 2391

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 25, 2014

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                              May 21, 2014

               Reported by Mr. Carper, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 5323 Highway N in Cottleville, Missouri as the ``Lance Corporal 
                    Phillip Vinnedge Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LANCE CORPORAL PHILLIP D. VINNEDGE POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 5323 Highway N in Cottleville, Missouri, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Lance Corporal Phillip Vinnedge Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any references in a law, map, regulation, 
document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Lance Corporal Phillip Vinnedge Post Office''.
                                                       Calendar No. 388

113th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 2391

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 5323 Highway N in Cottleville, Missouri as the ``Lance Corporal 
                    Phillip Vinnedge Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 21, 2014

                       Reported without amendment
```
#### Al Langer, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Creditors of Joed Stores Corporation, Appellant, v. Hurley Custom Hatters, Ltd., et al., Defendants, and Joed Stores Corporation et al., Respondents.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered July 17, 1968, affirmed, with costs to respondent Joed Stores Corporation. *(Schwartz*v. *Public Administrator of County of Bronx,*24 N Y 2d 65.) Beldock, P. J., Christ, Rabin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 224 (Monday, November 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 71155]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29288]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Market Test of Experimental Product: ``Alternative Postage 
Payment Method for Greeting Cards''

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of a market test of an 
experimental product in accordance with statutory requirements.

DATES: November 22, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David H. Rubin, 202-268-2986.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[reg] hereby 
gives notice pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3641(c)(1) that it will begin a 
market test of its ``Alternative Postage Payment Method for Greeting 
Cards'' experimental product on January 2, 2011. The Postal Service has 
filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a notice setting out the 
basis for the Postal Service's determination that the market test is 
covered by 39 U.S.C. 3641 and describing the nature and scope of the 
market test. Documents are available at http://www.prc.gov, Docket No. 
MT2011-1.

Neva R. Watson,
Attorney, Legislative.
[FR Doc. 2010-29288 Filed 11-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

RONALD ADAMS,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:20cv3627/LAC/EMT

WARDEN C. MAIORANA,

Defendant.

__________________________/

O R D E R

The Chief Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation on March

19, 2020 (ECF No. 7). Plaintiff was furnished a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, 

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined it 

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The Chief Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 

7) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim 

upon which relief may be granted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and 

§ 1915A(b)(1); and

Case 3:20-cv-03627-LC-EMT Document 8 Filed 04/16/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:20cv3627/LAC/EMT

3. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close 

the case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 16th day of April, 2020.

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

s/L.A. Collier 

Case 3:20-cv-03627-LC-EMT Document 8 Filed 04/16/20 Page 2 of 2
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S

N O S . A P - 7 6 , 5 2 8 , A P - 7 6 , 5 2 9 & A P - 7 6 , 5 3 0

E X P A R T E J O H N D E W A Y N E W I L L I A M S , A p p l i c a n t

O N A P P L I C A T I O N S F O R A W R I T O F H A B E A S C O R P U S C A U S E N O S . 1 1 4 - 0 3 2 9 - 0 9 , 1 1 4 - 0 3 3 0 - 0 9 & 1 1 4 - 0 3 3 1 - 0 9

I N T H E 1 1 4 T H D I S T R I C T C O U R T F R O M S M I T H C O U N T Y

P e r c u r i a m . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Ar t i cl e 1 1 .07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to thi s C o u rt t h ese applications for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two counts of robber y and one count of ag g rava ted robber y . He was sentenc ed to imprisonment for thirty y ear s

on eac h robber

y count and life on the ag g rava ted robbe ry count. Applicant contends that he was denied his rig ht to appea l. The t ri al court deter mined that appellate counsel did not rec eive timely notice of his appointment and rec ommended that we g rant2

relief

. We find, there fore , that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file out-of-time appea ls of the judgme nts of conviction in Ca use Nos. 114-0329- 09, 114-0330-09, and 114-0331-09 from the 114th J udicial District Court of Smit h County . Applicant is order ed re turned to that time at which he may g ive written notices of appea l so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain meaning ful appea ls. All time limit s shall be calc ulated as if the sentenc es had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosec ute appea ls, he must take aff irmative steps to fil e writ ten notices of appea l in the trial court within 30 day s afte r the mandate of

this Court i ssues.

Deliver ed: April 6, 2011 Do Not Publish
2005-2382.

#### State ex rel. Black v. Holmes.

In Mandamus. Reported at 108 Ohio St.3d 1469, 2006-Ohio-665, 842 N.E.2d 1050. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
**Exhibit 23.3**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTINGFIRM**

Board of DirectorsCKX, Inc. (formerly Sports Entertainment Enterprises, Inc.)New York, New York

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theregistration statements of CKX, Inc. on Form S-3 (File No. 333-1130712)and on Form S-8 (File No. 333-127119) of our report datedMarch 25, 2005, included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, onthe consolidated financial statements of CKX, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31,2004, and for each of the two years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003.

PIERCY BOWLER TAYLOR &KERN

Certified Public Accountants & BusinessAdvisorsA Professional CorporationLas Vegas, NevadaMarch 13, 2006

----
### -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 38 40 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 05/25 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 25 May 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 77.38 WMeters AGL
Editorial Note on Subchapter C of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter C appear by Amdt. 381, 65 FR 64586, Oct. 30, 2000.

§ 283.23 Procedural matters. ( a ) *Communications from Hearing Clerk.* In order to expedite the appeal process, the Hearing Clerk may develop form letters and transmittal forms to be used for notices, service of papers, requests for information, and all other communications between the Hearing Clerk's Office and the parties.
( b ) *Representation.* All parties may be represented by attorneys or by designated representatives. Attorneys or designated representatives appearing for the parties shall file formal notices of appearances and withdrawals with the Hearing Clerk.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 9, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136684 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136684 

 COA: 277619 

Wayne CC: 05-006850-01

ULYSSES WYNN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 29, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0828 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 9, 2008 

 Clerk
§ 3.45 USDA payment authorizing agency offset of pro rata share of payments due entity in which debtor participates. ( a ) A USDA payment authorizing agency, to satisfy either a non-centralized or centralized administrative offset under §§ 3.43 and 3.44, may offset: ( 1 ) A debtor's pro rata share of USDA payments due any entity in which the debtor participates, either directly or indirectly, as determined by the creditor agency or the payment authorizing agency or:
( 2 ) USDA payments due any entity that the debtor has established, or reorganized, transferred ownership of, or changed in some other manner the operation of, for the purpose of avoiding payment on the claim or debt, as determined by the creditor agency or the payment authorizing agency.
( b ) Prior to exercising the authority of this section to offset any portion of a payment due an entity, the creditor agency must have provided notice to that entity in accordance with § 3.41 of its intent to offset payments to the entity in satisfaction of the debt of an individual debtor participating in that entity.
#### § 29.24 Official standards.

Standards for tobacco promulgated by the Secretary under the Act.
#### § 28.464 Leaf Grade 4.

Leaf Grade 4 is leaf which is within the range represented by a set of samples in the custody of the United States Department of Agriculture in a container marked “Original Official Cotton Standards of the United States, American Upland, Strict Low Middling, effective July 1, 1987.”
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AVEO Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ended March 31,2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, David Johnston, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to hisknowledge on the date hereof: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: May 13, 2010
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2272 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to establish an electronic means by which 

members of the Ready Reserves of the Armed Forces may track their 

active-duty service. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 6, 2013 

Mr. MCKINLEY (for himself and Mr. OWENS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to establish an electronic 

means by which members of the Ready Reserves of the 

Armed Forces may track their active-duty service. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELECTRONIC TRACKING OF CERTAIN RESERVE 

4 DUTY. 

5 The Secretary of Defense shall establish an electronic 

6 means by which members of the Ready Reserve of the 

7 Armed Forces can track their operational active-duty serv8 ice performed after January 28, 2008, under section 

9 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 12302, or 12304 of title 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 2272 IH

1 10, United States Code. The tour calculator shall specify 

2 early retirement credit authorized for each qualifying tour 

3 of active duty, as well as cumulative early reserve retire4 ment credit authorized to date under section 12731(f) of 

5 such title. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. CASE NO: 3:99cr90/RV 

3:02cv42/RV/MD

MANUEL ANGEL CORREA

_____________________________________________________________________

ORDER

The defendant has filed a notice of appeal (doc. 165) and a motion for certificate of

appealability (doc. 166) with respect to the order entered on October 28, 2003 (doc. 159).

Unless a certificate of appealability is issued, the defendant may not take an appeal from

the final order denying section 2255 relief. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(1)(B). Such a certificate

may issue “only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).

Because the defendant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right, and for the reasons set forth in this court’s order of October 28, 2003,

a certificate of appealability is DENIED.

No motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis has been filed. The defendant has

not shown that the appeal is taken in good faith or that he is otherwise entitled to so 

proceed on appeal. Accordingly, the $255.00 filing fee shall be paid within 30 days from

the date of this order.

DONE AND ORDERED this 28th day of April, 2005.

/s/Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:99-cr-00090-RV Document 168 Filed 04/28/05 Page 1 of 1
§ 1724.5 Submission of documents to RUS. ( a ) *Where to send documents.* Documents required to be submitted to RUS under this part are to be sent to the Office of Loan Origination & Approval.
( b ) *Contracts requiring RUS approval.* The borrower shall submit to RUS three copies of each contract that is subject to RUS approval under subparts B and C of this part. At least one copy of each contract must be an original signed in ink (*i.e.,* no facsimile signature).
( c ) *Contract amendments requiring RUS approval.* The borrower shall submit to RUS three copies of each contract amendment (at least one copy of which must be an original signed in ink) which is subject to RUS approval.
[84 FR 32617, July 9, 2019]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 12, 2016

jam

Order 

Clerk

July 12, 2016

153684

ROBERT HEXIMER, 

Plaintiff,

v SC: 153684

AGC: 3774-06

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION,

Defendant.

___________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, plaintiff-appellant having failed to pay the 

partial filing fee as required by the order of May 25, 2016, the Clerk of the Court is 

hereby directed to close this file.