alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1994
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1995
<CASH>                                       3,032,000
<SECURITIES>                                 3,361,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,599,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (414,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,718,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,957,000
<PP&E>                                          58,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              (2,955,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,130,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         (817,000)
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        51,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  (9,262,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               (10,130,000)
<SALES>                                      9,511,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,511,000
<CGS>                                        7,028,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,732,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               231,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             312,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,937,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (500,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,437,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.48)
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13(a)-14(a)
(SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION)
   2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of Advanced BioEnergy, LLC, as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;
 4.
    
    Advanced BioEnergy, LLCs other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for Advanced BioEnergy, LLC, and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to Advanced BioEnergy, LLC, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of Advanced BioEnergy, LLCs disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any changes in Advanced BioEnergy, LLCs internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during Advanced BioEnergy, LLCs most
recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, Advanced BioEnergy, LLCs internal control over financial reporting.
 5.
    
    Advanced BioEnergy, LLCs other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Advanced BioEnergy, LLCs
auditors and the audit committee of Advanced BioEnergy, LLCs board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect Advanced BioEnergy, LLCs ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in Advanced BioEnergy, LLCs internal controls over
financial reporting.
 Date: May 15, 2006
    /s/ Revis L. Stephenson, IIIRevis L. Stephenson, III, (Principal ExecutiveOfficer)
**Exhibit31**

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(A) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT**

I, Roger Stone, Principal Executive Officer and Principal FinancialOfficer of Stone Arcade Acquisition Corporation, certify that:

1.             I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q/A of Stone Arcade Acquisition Corporation;

2.             Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.             Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

4.             I am responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a.     designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b.     evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report myconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and

c.     disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

5.             I have disclosed, based on my mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors:

a.     all significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

b.     any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: December 12, 2006 | /s/ Roger Stone                              |
|------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|                         | Roger Stone                                  |
|                         | Chairman and Chief  Executive Officer        |
|                         | (Principal Executive  and Financial Officer) |

 

----
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In the Interest of D.J.C. and J.R.C., 

Children

No. 06-18-00042-CV

Appeal from the County Court at Law of 

Hopkins County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

CV36948). Opinion delivered by Justice 

Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant has adequately indicated her inability to pay costs of appeal. 

Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED OCTOBER 12, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
§ 205.306 Labeling of livestock feed. ( a ) Livestock feed products described in § 205.301(e)(1) and (e)(2) may display on any package panel the following terms: ( 1 ) The statement, “100 percent organic” or “organic,” as applicable, to modify the name of the feed product;
( 2 ) The USDA seal;
( 3 ) The seal, logo, or other identifying mark of the certifying agent which certified the production or handling operation producing the raw or processed organic ingredients used in the finished product, *Provided,* That, such seals or marks are not displayed more prominently than the USDA seal;
( 4 ) The word, “organic,” or an asterisk or other reference mark which is defined on the package to identify ingredients that are organically produced. Water or salt included as ingredients cannot be identified as organic.
( b ) Livestock feed products described in § 205.301(e)(1) and (e)(2) must: ( 1 ) On the information panel, below the information identifying the handler or distributor of the product and preceded by the statement, “Certified organic by * * *,” or similar phrase, display the name of the certifying agent that certified the handler of the finished product. The business address, Internet address, or telephone number of the certifying agent may be included in such label.
( 2 ) Comply with other Federal agency or State feed labeling requirements as applicable.
#### City of Rochester, Plaintiff v MacKnight, Kirmmse and French et al., Respondents, and York Division of Borg-Warner Corp., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Defendant York Division of Borg-Warner Corp., subcontractor for the construction of the ice rink at the Monroe County War Memorial, appeals from an order denying its motion to dismiss the cross claims against it alleged by the architects, defendants MacKnight, Kirmmse and French, and the engineers, defendants Smith and Smith Associates. Plaintiffs complaint asserted causes of action in negligence, breach of contract and breach of warranty against the architects and engineers and similar causes of action against the remaining defendants, including York. In essence, plaintiff alleges that the *991architects and engineers caused damage to its property by failing properly to design and supervise the construction of an ice rink and its cooling system, and that the contractor and its subcontractors, including York, caused the same damage to its property by failing to comply with specifications, failing to perform in a workmanlike manner and failing to provide equipment and materials of merchantable quality and fit for the purpose for which they were intended. Manifestly, under these pleadings it is possible that the proof may establish that both the cross-claiming defendants and the appellant York contributed to causing the property damage. Accordingly, and regardless of whether the recovery be upon similar or different theories, the architects and the engineers may be entitled to indemnity or apportionment from appellant and the motion was properly denied (CPLR 1401, 1403; *Taft v Shaffer*Trucking; 52 AD2d 255; and cf. *Carrols Equities Corp. v Villnave,*76 Misc 2d 205, affd 49 AD2d 672). (Appeal from order of Monroe Supreme Court—dismiss cross claims.) Present—Simons, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Doerr and Moule, JJ.
#### § 29.2626 Rule 10.

Any special factor approved by the Director of the Tobacco Division, Agricultural Marketing Service, may be used to show a peculiar side or characteristic of the tobacco which tends to modify the grade.

[37 FR 13626, July 12, 1972, as amended at 49 FR 16757, Apr. 20, 1984]
###### Editorial Note on Part 1962

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1962 appear at 80 FR 9902, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1962.2 Policy.

Chattel security, EO property and note only loans will be serviced to accomplish the loan objectives and protect Rural Development's financial interest. To accomplish these objectives, security will be serviced in accordance with the security instruments and related agreements, including any authorized modifications, provided the borrower has reasonable prospects of accomplishing the loan objectives, properly maintains and accounts for the security, and otherwise satisfactorily meets the loan obligations including repayment.
#### § 27.12 Classification request for each lot of cotton.

For each lot or mark of cotton of which the applicant desires separate classification and certification, the applicant shall make a separate written request in a form prescribed or supplied by the Cotton Division for that purpose.

[48 FR 49210, Oct. 25, 1983]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PENSACOLA DIVISION
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. 94-03033-01/RV

COURTNEY BOYD

JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL ON JURY VERDICT

The above entitled cause came on for trial by a jury, and the
jury having returned verdicts of not guilty as to Counts I and II,
it is thereupon

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the defendant is not quilty of
Counts I and II as charged in this cause.

DONE and ORDERED at Pensacola, Florida, this 30th day of
August, 1994.

—_——

ROGER VI. IN
United $ ates District Judge

yy, Be
sg hese
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATIONS
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




I,
      William J. Worthen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
      Quarterly Report of Alsius Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
      ended June 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
      in such quarterly report on Form 10-Q presents in all material respects the
      financial condition and results of operations of Alsius
      Corporation.




Date:
                August 14, 2007
            
            By:
            /s/
                  William J. WorthenName:
            William
                J. WorthenTitle:
            President
                and Chief Executive Officer






I,
      Brett
      L. Scott, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
      of Alsius Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30,
      2007
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such quarterly
      report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial
      condition and results of operations of Alsius Corporation




Date:
                August 14, 2007
            
            By:
            /s/
                  Brett L. ScottName:
            Brett
                L. ScottTitle:
            Chief
                Financial Officer





*A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to Alsius Corporation and will be retained by Alsius Corporation and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.*
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, Nathan A. McDonald, the Principal Accounting Officer of CellCyte Genetics Corporation, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CellCyte Genetics Corporation, for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of CellCyte Genetics Corporation.

Date:     August 19, 2008.

| | /s/ "Nathan A. McDonald"                       
| | -----------------------------------------------
| | Nathan A. McDonald
Principal Accounting Officer

__________
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:88-cr-01007-MP-GRJ-3

RUFUS C. ROCHELL,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's Report and

Recommendation dated January 22, 2014. (Doc. 1542). The parties have been furnished a copy

of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections

pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). The time for filing objections has

passed, and none have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report

and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 1542) is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Defendant’s motion to vacate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. 1541) is

DISMISSED as this Court lacks jurisdiction to consider a successive § 2255

motion absent authorization from the Eleventh Circuit.
Page 2 of 2

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED, pursuant to Rule 11(a) of the Rules

Governing Section 2255 Cases in the U.S. District Courts.

DONE AND ORDERED this 21st day of February, 2014

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case No: 1:88-cr-01007-MP-GRJ-3
EXHIBIT 11

                 Statement Re: Computation of Per Share Earnings


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    November 30,
                                                                    ------------
                                                             1998                  1997
                                                             ----                  ----
<S>                                                       <C>                  <C>
Diluted:

        Average Shares Outstanding Disregarding
        Dilutive Convertible Preferred Stock               2,721,670             2,710,918

Assuming Conversion at beginning of Year of:

        $10 Convertible Preferred Stock                      344,444               666,667
        10% Convertible Preferred Stock                       15,600                19,200
        8% Convertible Preferred Stock                        18,095                34,444
        12% Convertible Preferred Stock                       31,746                31,746
                                                          ----------           -----------

Shares Outstanding                                         3,131,555             3,462,975
                                                          ----------           -----------

Income [Loss] Available to Common
   Stockholders Fully Diluted
   Calculations                                          $(2,744,856)          $(2,954,215)

Per Share Amount:
   Net Income [Loss]                                           $(.87)                $(.85)
                                                         -----------           -----------
</TABLE>

This calculation is submitted in accordance with Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Release No. 9083 although it is contrary to paragraph 48 of APB No. 15 because
it produces an antidilutive result.
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS**


**ADOPTED
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




I,
      Michael R. Hull, Chief Financial Officer of BabyUniverse, Inc. (the “Company”)
      in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that to the best of my
      knowledge:




(1)     the
      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, as filed
      with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, 2007 fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)     the
      information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




In
      Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 15th day
      of
      May 2007.




/s/ *Michael
              R. Hull**Michael
                R. Hull*Chief
                Financial Officer
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. Case No: 3:97cr78/RV

3:05cv189/RV/MD

GHASSEN GEORGE MOUREY

_____________________________________________________________________

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and

recommendation dated July 18, 2005. The defendant previously has been furnished

a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to

file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), and I have

made a de novo determination of those portions to which an objection has been

made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto

timely filed by the parties, I have determined that the report and recommendation

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The government’s motion to dismiss the § 2255 motion to vacate is

denied and it is directed to respond to the merits of defendant’s motion within thirty

(30) days of this order.

DONE AND ORDERED this 16th day of August, 2005.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:97-cr-00078-RV-MD Document 102 Filed 08/16/05 Page 1 of 1