alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 212 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 212

   To permit members of the House of Representatives to donate used 
     computer equipment to public elementary and secondary schools 
                       designated by the members.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2013

 Mr. Serrano introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To permit members of the House of Representatives to donate used 
     computer equipment to public elementary and secondary schools 
                       designated by the members.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMITTING MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES TO DONATE 
              USED COMPUTER EQUIPMENT TO PUBLIC SCHOOLS.

    (a) In General.--Section 104(a)(3) of the Legislative Branch 
Appropriations Act, 1987 (as incorporated by reference in section 
101(j) of Public Law 99-500 and Public Law 99-591) (2 U.S.C. 117e(3)) 
is amended to read as follows:
            ``(3)(A) At the request of a member of the House of 
        Representatives, in the case of equipment consisting of 
        computers and related peripheral tools previously used by the 
        member, the Clerk may donate the equipment to a public 
        elementary or secondary school (as defined in section 9101 of 
        the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
        7801)) without regard to whether the donation meets the 
        requirements of the second sentence of paragraph (2).
            ``(B) At the request of the member who previously used the 
        equipment, if the Clerk donates equipment under this paragraph, 
        the Clerk shall donate the equipment to a school designated by 
        the member.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect June 1, 2013.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 21
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                    Subsidiaries of the Registrant

NAME                                             JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION         PERCENTAGE OWNERSHIP
<S>                                              <C>                                   <C>

Billion Luck Company Ltd.                        British Virgin Islands                100%

Sunwide Capital Limited                          British Virgin Islands                100%(held by Billion Luck)

Silver Moon Technologies Limited                 British Virgin Islands                80%

Zhongwei Medi-China.com Limited                  Hong Kong Special Administrative      100% (held by Silver Moon)
                                                 Region

Hainan Cihui Industrial Company Ltd.             People's Republic of China            100% (5% held by the
                                                                                       Registrant and 95% held
                                                                                       by Billion Luck)

First Goods And Materials Supply                 People's Republic of China            100% (held by HARC)
   and Sales Corporation

Second Goods And Materials Supply                People's Republic of China            100% (held by HARC)
   and Sales Corporation

Hainan Zhongwei Trading Company Ltd.             People's Republic of China            100% (95% held by
                                                                                       HARC and 5% held by
                                                                                       Billion Luck)

Zhuhai Zhongwei Development Co. Ltd.             People's Republic of China            100% (held by HARC)

Shenzhen Xubu Investment Co. Ltd.                People's Republic of China            100% (held by HARC)
</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 23, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-10858 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MORRIS MARK WOMACK, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:93-CR-135-X-2-R

-------------------- Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Morris Mark Womack appeals the district court’s revocation of his supervised release. Womack argues that the protections afforded by Boykin v. Alabama , 395 U.S. 238 (1969), and F ED . R. C RIM . P. 11 should be extended to supervised-release revocation proceedings. He contends that his revocation, therefore, should be vacated because the district court did not inquire on the record whether his plea of true was knowing and voluntary.No. 02-10858 -2- Because Womack raises this argument for the first time on appeal, this court’s review is for plain error only. United States v. Calverley , 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994)(en banc), abrogated in part , Johnson v. United States , 520 U.S. 461 (1997). Contrary to Womack’s assertion, plain error review applies to issues of law raised for the first time on appeal. See United States v. Olano , 507 U.S. 725, 732-33 (1993).

In United States v. Johns , 625 F.2d 1175, 1176 (5th Cir. Unit B 1980), this court held that F ED . R. C RIM . P. 11 is inapplicable to probation-revocation hearings. As the procedures for supervised-release revocations and probation revocations are the same, see F ED . R. C RIM . P. 32.1, the issue whether the district court should have conducted a F ED . R. C RIM . P. 11 colloquy at Womack’s supervised-release revocation hearing is arguably foreclosed by Johns . Thus, Womack fails to demonstrate that the district court erred, plainly or otherwise, by not conducting a F ED . R. C RIM . P. 11 colloquy. This court has not yet addressed the issue whether Boykin is applicable to supervised-release or probation-revocation hearings. See Johns , 625 F.2d at 1176. Given the lack of controlling authority in this circuit on this issue, any error by the district court with regard to Boykin was not clear or obvious and, therefore, does not meet the plain-error standard. See Calverley , 37 F.3d at 162-64. Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
Case 7:20-cv-02945-MCR-HTC Document 20-21 Filed 08/09/22 Page 1 of 5
PLAINTIFFS'

TRIAL EXHIBIT

P-GEN-01381

P-GEN-01381.1 Case 7:20-cv-02945-MCR-HTC Document 20-21 Filed 08/09/22 Page 2 of 5
P-GEN-01381.2 Case 7:20-cv-02945-MCR-HTC Document 20-21 Filed 08/09/22 Page 3 of 5
P-GEN-01381.3 Case 7:20-cv-02945-MCR-HTC Document 20-21 Filed 08/09/22 Page 4 of 5
P-GEN-01381.4 Case 7:20-cv-02945-MCR-HTC Document 20-21 Filed 08/09/22 Page 5 of 5
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   dec-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         4,947
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  24,482
<ALLOWANCES>                                   2,757
<INVENTORY>                                    739
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               30,063
<PP&E>                                         36,332
<DEPRECIATION>                                 12,481
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 91,359
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          35,057
<BONDS>                                        33,321
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    10,061
<COMMON>                                       56,120
<OTHER-SE>                                     (32,861)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   91,359
<SALES>                                        117,142
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               117,142
<CGS>                                          93,863
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  93,863
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               26,243
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,730
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,694)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,445)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,694)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,248)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.23)
        



</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Section 906Certification**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), the undersigned officer of GuarantyBancorp (the “Company”) hereby certifies that the Company’s QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated:November 7, 2008
|   |                                              |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                              |
|   | /s/   Paul  W. Taylor              |
|   | Name: Paul W. Taylor                         |
|   | Title:   *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnishedsolely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C. Section 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as aseparate disclosure document.

 

----
Exhibit 10.13



 











Exhibit 10.13




Summary of Amendment to Richard M. Adams’ Employment Contract




     United Bankshares, Inc. (the “Company”) entered into an employment contract with Richard M.
Adams, the Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company effective
April 11, 1986. The original term of Mr. Adams’ employment contract was five years commencing
March 31, 1986, with the provision that the contract could be extended annually for one (1) year to
maintain a rolling five (5) year contract. This contract was amended in November 2002, to extend
the initial term of the contract through March 31, 2008, with the provision for additional one (1)
year term extensions by the Executive Committee with the approval of Mr. Adams. In November 2003,
the Board of Directors of the Company extended Mr. Adams’ employment contract for an additional
year until March 31, 2009.



     At its meeting on November 4, 2004, the Committee agreed to recommend to the Board of
Directors that Mr. Adams’ employment contract be extended for an additional year until March 31,
2010. The Board of Directors approved this recommendation at a meeting on November 22, 2004.



89
_________________________________________ 

 

Order Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

September 28, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 128265 Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman,

Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 128265 

 COA: 258541 
 Wayne CC: 03-001476-01 

PATRICK LEE BATES, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 25, 2005 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0919 

I, CORBIN R. DAVIS, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 28, 2005
 

Clerk
#### § 22.104 General policy.

Federal implementation of the Act will be consistent with the President's policy of decentralized decisionmaking and administrative responsibility which gives fullest possible consideration to State and local rural development goals and priorities. As a result of section 817(4) of the Agriculture and Consumer Protection Act of 1973 (Pub. L. 93-86) which prohibits prior approval by any State officials of any loan or grant under any program authorized by title I of the Rural Development Act of 1972 (Pub. L. 92-419), it has been necessary to substantially modify the planned administration of programs under section 603 of the Rural Development Act.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

ex rel. ROBERT V. SMITH,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 3:20cv3678-MCR-EMT

JAY A. ODOM and 

OKALOOSA COUNTY 

BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is the Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice,

ECF No. 22, seeking admission of attorney Peter J. Kirsch, of the law firm of Kaplan

Kirsch & Rockwell LLP, to appear before this Court on behalf of Defendant, Jay A.

Odom. The motion indicates Mr. Kirsch is a member in good standing of the

Colorado Bar Association, as stated on the certificate of good standing dated within

30 days of filing the motion, and he has successfully completed the computer-based

tutorials for the local rules of this Court and CM/ECF. He has also paid the required

Case 3:20-cv-03678-MCR-EMT Document 23 Filed 02/02/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

admission fee. Having fully reviewed the matter, the Court finds that the

requirements of the Court’slocalrules have been satisfied, see N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 11.1,

and the motion is due to be granted.

Accordingly:

1. The Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice, ECF No. 22, is

GRANTED.

2. Attorney Peter J. Kirsch, of the law firm of Kaplan Kirsch & Rockwell

LLP, is admitted pro hac vice to represent the Defendant, Jay A. Odom, pursuant to

Local Rule 11.1(C).

DONE and ORDERED this 2nd day of February 2021.

 M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No. 3:20cv3678-MCR-EMT

Case 3:20-cv-03678-MCR-EMT Document 23 Filed 02/02/21 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 32**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Each of the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to their knowledge:

(1)          this periodic report fully complies with the applicable requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)          the information contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Advanced BioEnergy, LLC.
| Dated: September 13, 2006 |   |                         |
|---------------------------|--------|------------------------------|
|                      |   | * *                     |
|                      |   | */s/Revis L. Stephenson III* |
|                      |   | Revis L. Stephenson          |
|                      |   | Chief Executive Officer      |
|                      |   |                         |
|                      |   |                         |
|                      |   | */s/ Robert W. Holmes*       |
|                      |   | Robert W. Holmes             |
|                      |   | Treasurer                    |

 

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 1980

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1980 appear at 80 FR 9905, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### §§ 1980.406-1980.410 [Reserved]
#### § 2812.10 Liabilities and losses.

USDA assumes no liability with respect to accidents, bodily injury, illness, or any other damages or loss related to excess personal property/equipment donated under this part. The donee is advised to insure or otherwise protect itself and others as appropriate.
Exhibit 32.2





Certification
of Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant
to


Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) of ATS Corporation (the “Registrant”), as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Pamela
A. Little, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.





Date:
      November 3, 2010
            By:
            /s/ Pamela A. LittlePamela
      A. LittleExecutive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)
II 

Calendar No. 399 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2337 

[Report No. 113–173] 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 30, 2013 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

MAY 22, 2014 

Reported by Ms. LANDRIEU, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To provide for the conveyance of the Forest Service Lake 

Hill Administrative Site in Summit County, Colorado. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lake Hill Administra5 tive Site Affordable Housing Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2337 RS

1 (1) COUNTY.—The term ‘‘County’’ means Sum2 mit County, Colorado. 

3 (2) LAKE HILL ADMINISTRATIVE SITE.—The 

4 term ‘‘Lake Hill Administrative Site’’ means the 

5 parcel of approximately 40 acres of National Forest 

6 System land in the County, as depicted on the map 

7 entitled ‘‘Lake Hill Administrative Site’’ and dated 

8 June 2012. 

9 (3) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

10 the Secretary of Agriculture. 

11 SEC. 3. CONVEYANCE OF FOREST SERVICE LAKE HILL AD12 MINISTRATIVE SITE, SUMMIT COUNTY, COLO13 RADO. 

14 (a) CONVEYANCE AUTHORITY.—Upon receipt of an 

15 offer from the County in which the County agrees to the 

16 condition imposed by subsection (c), the Secretary shall 

17 use the authority provided by the Forest Service Facility 

18 Realignment and Enhancement Act of 2005 (Public Law 

19 109–54; 16 U.S.C. 580d note) to convey to the County 

20 all right, title, and interest of the United States in and 

21 to the Forest Service Lake Hill Administrative Site. 

22 (b) APPLICATION OF LAW.— 

23 (1) TREATMENT AS ADMINISTRATIVE SITE.— 

24 The Lake Hill Administrative Site is considered to 

25 be an administrative site under section 502(1)(A) of 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2337 RS

1 the Forest Service Facility Realignment and En2 hancement Act of 2005 (Public Law 109–54; 16 

3 U.S.C. 580d note). 

4 (2) EXCEPTION.—Section 502(1)(C) of that 

5 Act does not apply to the conveyance of the Lake 

6 Hill Administrative Site. 

7 (c) COSTS.—The County shall be responsible for 

8 processing and transaction costs related to the direct sale 

9 under subsection (a). 

10 (d) PROCEEDS.—Proceeds received from the convey11 ance pursuant to subsection (a) shall be available, without 

12 further appropriation and until expended, for capital im13 provement and maintenance of Forest Service facilities in 

14 Region 2 of the United States Forest Service. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 399 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2337 

[Report No. 113–173] 

AN ACT 

To provide for the conveyance of the Forest Service 

Colorado. Lake Hill Administrative Site in Summit County, 

MAY 22, 2014 

Reported without amendment 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
From: Fairchild.Susan@epamail.epa.gov

Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 11:38 AM

To: Angus Crane

Thank you for the conversation this morning. Rick Marinshaw and Cindy Hancy at RTI have reviewed the

status of the ICR data, and have found that certain information is missing. In summary of our

c onversation:

MISSING TEST AND SURVEY DATA FROM WOOL FIBERGLASS: CertainTeed, Mountain Top, PA: we have no data for this facility

- this facility is closed for at lea st 2

- 3

years

. FiberTEK, Nephi, UT: We have no data for this facility (Note: we do have some unlabeled CBI
data from FiberTEK, but we believe that is for the Lakeland, FL, plant)

- this facility has not yet started production.

MISSING FINANCIAL DAT A FROM WOOL FIBERGLASS: All plants for CertainTeed, FiberTEK, Johns Manville, Owens

- Corning

MISSING FINANCIAL DATA FROM MINERAL WOOL: Industrial Insulation Group, Rock Wool Manufacturing.

In our conversation this morning, it was your understand ing that the companies had sent forward to EPA the financial data requested in the ICR, and that you would follow up with these companies to find out what happened to the financial data, and would make certain that EPA receives the missing information.

Thank you for tracking these down and ensuring that the information to support the RTR rule for these categories is sent forward to EPA. As always, if these data are being claimed as CBI, responders should clearly mark the disk and /or the materials with the words "Confidential Business Information" and send either via U.S. Postal Service Express Mail, registered mail, or private courier to:

US Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards US EPA Mailroom (C

- 404

- 02) Attn: Mr Roberto Morales, DCO (Project 09

- 01) Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Thank you for your attention to this matter, and please feel free to contact me at the following:

Susan Fairchild

Environmental Scientist U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

direct line: 919.541.5167

fax: 919.541

- 3207 email: fairchild.susan@epa.gov

Overnight mail address:

US EPA

Mail Code D243

- 02

109 TW Alexander Drive
RTP, NC 27709