alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2289 

To rename section 219(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as the 

Kay Bailey Hutchison Spousal IRA. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 6, 2013 

Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas (for himself, Mr. BRADY of Texas, Mr. MARCHANT, Ms. GRANGER, Mr. OLSON, Mr. CULBERSON, Mr. MCCAUL, and Mr. 

FLORES) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To rename section 219(c) of the Internal Revenue Code 

of 1986 as the Kay Bailey Hutchison Spousal IRA. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON SPOUSAL IRA. 

4 The heading of subsection (c) of section 219 of the 

5 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

6 ‘‘SPECIAL RULES FOR CERTAIN MARRIED INDIVIDUALS’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON SPOUSAL IRA’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
###### Editorial Note on Part 1924

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1924 appear at 80 FR 9870, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### §§ 1924.277-1924.299 [Reserved]
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y A lton Thomas Davis,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk November 22, 2010

d1115 

# Order

November 22, 2010

141431

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141431 COA: 296436 Wayne CC: 93-010170-01-FC EVERETT BURNETT, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the June 15, 2010 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### § 29.1035 Mixed color (KM).

Distinctly different colors of the type mingled together. (See Rule 16.)

[42 FR 21092, Apr. 25, 1977. Redesignated at 49 FR 16755, Apr. 20, 1984, and 51 FR 25027, July 10, 1986]
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Volcom, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Richard R. Woolcott, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Douglas P. Collier, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Volcom, Inc. and will be retained
by Volcom, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                      |  |                                                                                                                            
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 9, 2010 |  | /s/ Richard R. Woolcott                                                                                                    
|                      |  | Richard R. Woolcott Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)                                     
|                      | 
|Dated: August 9, 2010 |  | /s/ Douglas P. Collier                                                                                                     
|                      |  | Douglas P. Collier Executive
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)

The foregoing certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350. These certifications shall not be
deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall they be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, whether made before
or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
1

 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

DAVID PRIESTER,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 4:20cv176-MW/MAF

MARK INCH, Secretary,

Florida Department of Corrections,

et al.,

Respondents.

___________________________/ 

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report 

and Recommendation. ECF No. 4. Upon consideration, no objections having been 

filed by the parties,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as this Court’s 

opinion. The case file, including any service copies and pending motions, is 

TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Middle District of 

Case 4:20-cv-00176-MW-MAF Document 6 Filed 05/12/20 Page 1 of 2
2

Florida, Orlando Division, for all further proceedings. The Clerk shall also close the 

file.

SO ORDERED on May 12, 2020.

s/ MARK E. WALKER

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00176-MW-MAF Document 6 Filed 05/12/20 Page 2 of 2
Welcome and Opening Remarks

11th Conference on Air Quality Modeling

Research Triangle Park, NC

Chet Wayland

OAQPS-AQAD Director

8/12/2015 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1
SHERROD BROWN 

OHIO 

COMMITTEES: 

AGRICULTURE, NUTRITION, 

;ULTURE, NUTRITION, (^l^»»;^-, J <S:<-/i»4.«,-«, CH^**^*- ^ AND FORESTRY imtZi ^MZB ^^^^1 

BANKING, HOUSING, 

AND URBAN AFFAIRS WASHINGTON, DC 20510 

HEALTH, EDUCATION, 

LABOR, AND PENSIONS 

VETERANS'AFFAIRS AugUSt 10 , 201 1 

SELECT COMMITTEE ON ETHICS 

Aloha Ley 

Associate Director 

Small Community Air Service Development Program .__, ,.-^ ^— 

United States Department of Transportation ri iiq,=^; 

Officeof Aviation Analysis D 5:;^—i 

,.) 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

•o oo~T-o I 

o !""/• > 

Dear Director Ley: 

It is my pleasure to support the Toledo Express Airport its effort to secure funding through the 

U.S. Department of Transportation's Small Community Air Service Development Program 

Grant. 

If awarded, fimding would be used to attract new air service from Toledo Express to better serve 

their communities. The Toledo Express Airport has seen a significant decline in its air traffic in 

the past decade, and airline capacity at Toledo Express is down more than 70 percent from 2003. 

The airport has developed a comprehensive air service incentive program, including groimd 

handling support and startup phase fee waivers. It is my hope that the combination of the grant 

funding to support marketing and promotional activities, as well as the airport's incentive 

program will provide Toledo with the tools it needs to reverse the leakage of local air travel 

demand to other airports, and re-establish some of the air service that has been lost in recent 

years. 

Please give serious consideration to Toledo Express Airport's application for funding. I ask that 

you keep my office informed of the status of this application. 

Sincerely, 

W» 

Sherrod Brown 

United States Senator 

SB:lm 

PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
Exhibit 32.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Shepard Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

   1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Date:  August 9, 2006


/s/ Michael Eyre
-------------------------------------------
Michael Eyre, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 1:03-cr-00059-MP-AK

JEROME WAYNE JOHNSON,

Defendant.

________________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court Doc. 207, Motion for Writ of Mandamus, and Doc. 208

Motion for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis, filed by Defendant Jerome Johnson. In his

motion for a mandamus writ, Defendant states that he filed his motion to vacate under 18 U.S.C.

§ 2255 on July 19, 2006, and that to date no ruling been issued on his habeas petition. Because

of this, Defendant requests a writ of mandamus compelling the Court to rule on his motion to

vacate. Defendant’s motion to vacate is currently pending before the Magistrate Judge, who

explained to Defendant July 26, 2007, that “Defendant’s motion to vacate is in line for decision

behind many other older motions to vacate and will be considered in due time.” Doc. 199. 

Considering that Defendant’s motion to vacate, supporting memorandum, and exhibits comprise

one hundred forty-nine pages of documents, the Court finds that the length of review of the

habeas petition is not unreasonable. Furthermore, Rule 81(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure expressly abrogates the power of a District Court to issue mandamus writs. 

Therefore, Defendant’s Motion for Writ of Mandamus is denied. In addition, the Court is

unclear as to which order Defendant seeks appeal. Since there has been no final order in this

case, Defendant’s motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis is denied as moot. 

Case 1:03-cr-00059-MP-AK Document 209 Filed 11/08/07 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 1:03-cr-00059-MP-AK

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. Defendant’s Motion for Writ of Mandamus, Doc. 207, is denied.

2. Defendant’s Motion for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis, Doc. 208, is denied

as moot.

DONE AND ORDERED this 8th day of November, 2007

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:03-cr-00059-MP-AK Document 209 Filed 11/08/07 Page 2 of 2
98-1151.

#### State v. Jackson.

Hamilton App. No. C-960628. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. It appears from the records of this court that appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due August 14, 1998, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed *sua sponte.*
§ 2500.048 Review of disallowed costs. ( a ) *Notice.* If the OAO Project Officer (PO) determines that there is a basis for disallowing a cost, OAO shall provide the awardee written notice of its intent to disallow the cost. The written notice shall state the amount of the cost and the factual and legal basis for disallowing it.
( b ) *Awardee response.* Within 60 days of receiving written notice of the PO's intent to disallow the cost, the awardee may respond with written evidence and arguments to show the cost is allowable, or that, for equitable, practical, or other reasons, shall not recover all or part of the amount, or that the recovery should be made in installments. An extension of time will be granted only in extenuating circumstances.
( c ) *Decision.* Within 60 days of receiving the awardee's written response to the notice of intent to disallow the cost, the PO shall issue a management decision stating whether or not the cost has been disallowed, the reasons for the decision, and the method of appeal that has been provided under this section. If the awardee does not respond to the written notice under paragraph (a) of this section within the time frame specified in paragraph (b) of this section, the PO shall issue a management decision on the basis of the information available to it. The management decision shall constitute the final action with respect to whether the cost is allowed or disallowed. In the case of a questioned cost identified in the context of an audit subject to 7 CFR part 3052, the management decision will constitute the management decision under 7 CFR 3052.405(a).
( d ) *Demand for payment.* If the management decision under paragraph (c) of this section constitutes a finding that the cost is disallowed and, therefore, that a debt is owed to the Government, the PO shall provide the required demand and notice pursuant to 7 CFR 3.11.
( e ) *Review process.* Within 60 days of receiving the demand and notice referred to in paragraph (d) of this section, the awardee may submit a written request to the OAO Director for a review of the final management decision that the debt exists and the amount of the debt. Within 60 days of receiving the written request for a review, the OAO Director will issue a final decision regarding the debt. A review by the OAO Director or designee constitutes an administrative review for debts under 7 CFR part 3, subpart F.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000795662
<NAME> STERLING CHEMICALS HOLDINGS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          14,921
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  142,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,341)
<INVENTORY>                                     70,464
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               259,568
<PP&E>                                         779,498
<DEPRECIATION>                                 376,775
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 775,099
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          157,090
<BONDS>                                        964,555
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           20,932
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           123
<OTHER-SE>                                   (455,510)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   775,099
<SALES>                                        720,752
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               720,752
<CGS>                                          682,594
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  682,594
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                74,850
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             104,061
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (140,753)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (34,936)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (105,817)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (4,212)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (110,029)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (8.94)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (8.94)


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENSACOLA DISTRICT 

IN RE: 3m COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCTS 

LIABILITY LITIGATION 

This Document Relates to 

Edwidge Adhemar 

7:20-cv-46643

 Case No. 3:19-md-2885 

Hon. Judge M. Casey Rodgers 

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones 

NOTICE OF DESIGNATED FORUM 

Pursuant to this Court’s orders, Pretrial Orders 22, 29, and 30, Plaintiff designates his 

forum as the Southern District of Florida. 

Date: April 16, 2020 

Respectfully Submitted,

HARE, WYNN, NEWELL & NEWTON, LLP 

By: /s/ Jason W. Earley

Jason W. Earley (pro hac vice) 

ALBN 3427Q10M 

HARE, WYNN, NEWELL & NEWTON, LLP 

2025 Third Avenue North, 8th Floor 

Birmingham, AL 35203 

jason@hwnn.com

Phone: 205-328-5330 

Facsimile: 205-324-2165 

Attorney for Plaintiff Edwidge Adhemar

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned, an attorney, certifies that the foregoing Notice of Designation was filed 

electronically with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system on April 16, 2020 which will 

serve same electronically on all counsel of record. 

/s/ Jason W. Earley 

Case 7:20-cv-46643-MCR-GRJ Document 5 Filed 04/16/20 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2332 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2332

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to recognize Indian tribal 
   governments for purposes of determining under the adoption credit 
                   whether a child has special needs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 12, 2013

 Mr. Kilmer (for himself, Mr. Kind, Mr. Markey, Ms. Moore, Mr. Heck of 
 Washington, Mr. Larsen of Washington, Mr. Becerra, Mr. Cardenas, Ms. 
   McCollum, Mr. Blumenauer, Mr. Honda, Ms. Hanabusa, Mr. Pocan, Ms. 
 Slaughter, Mr. Cole, Mr. Keating, Mr. Hastings of Florida, Mr. Grimm, 
    Mr. Conyers, Mr. Moran, and Mr. Young of Alaska) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to recognize Indian tribal 
   governments for purposes of determining under the adoption credit 
                   whether a child has special needs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Adoption Tax Credit Tribal Parity 
Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. RECOGNIZING INDIAN TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF 
              DETERMINING UNDER THE ADOPTION CREDIT WHETHER A CHILD HAS 
              SPECIAL NEEDS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (3) of section 23(d) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (defining child with special needs) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ``or Indian tribe (as 
        defined in section 7871(c)(3)(E))'' after the words ``a 
        State''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ``or Indian tribe'' 
        after the words ``such State''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, M. Christine Jacobs, certify that:

|1. |  | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
                    December 31, 2003 of Theragenics Corporation®;
|-- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
                    material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
                    made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
                    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|3. |  | [Intentionally omitted]
|-- |  | -----------------------

|4. |  | [Intentionally omitted]
|-- |  | -----------------------

|5. |  | [Intentionally omitted]
|-- |  | -----------------------

|               | THERAGENICS CORPORATION®                                                                                             
|-------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|August 2, 2004 | /s/ M. Christine JacobsM. Christine JacobsChairman, President & Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CMC
SECURITIES CORPORATION I'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               1
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 647,408
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               30
<BONDS>                                        647,407
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                         (39)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   647,408
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                51,372
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,666
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              49,728
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (22)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (22)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (22)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>