alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Subchapter C of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter C appear by Amdt. 381, 65 FR 64586, Oct. 30, 2000.

Editorial Note on Part 276
Editorial Note: OMB control numbers relating to this part 276 are contained in § 271.8.

§ 276.3 Negligence or fraud. ( a ) *General.* If FNS determines that there has been negligence or fraud on the part of the State agency in the certification of applicant households, the State agency shall, upon demand, pay to FNS a sum equal to the amount of coupons issued as a result of such negligence or fraud.
( b ) *Negligence provisions.* ( 1 ) FNS may determine that a State agency has been negligent in the certification of applicant households if a State agency disregards SNAP requirements contained in the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008, the regulations issued pursuant to the Act, the FNS-approved State Plan of Operation and a loss of Federal funds results or a State agency implements procedures which deviate from SNAP requirements contained in the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008, the SNAP regulations, the FNS-approved State Plan of Operation without first obtaining FNS approval, and the implementation of the procedures results in a loss of Federal funds.
( 2 ) In computing amounts of losses of Federal funds due to negligence, FNS may use actual, documented amounts or amounts which have been determined through the use of statistically valid projections. When a statistically valid projection is used, the methodology will include a 95 percent, one-sided confidence level.
( 3 ) FNS will base its determinations of negligence on information drawn from any of a number of sources. These information sources include, but are not limited to, State and Federal Performance Reporting reviews, State and Federal audits and investigations, State corrective action plans and any required reports.
( 4 ) Failure by the State agency to remit payment upon demand, within the specified time period, may result in FNS recovering the lost funds through offsets to the State agency's Letter of Credit, in accordance with § 277.16(c).
( c ) *Fraud provisions.* For purposes of this subsection, the term fraud shall mean the wrongful acquisition or issuance of food coupons by the State agency or its officers, employees or agents, including issuance agents, through false representation or concealment of material facts. State agencies shall be liable to FNS for the amount of loss of Federal funds as a result of fraud. Failure by the State agency to remit payment on demand by FNS, within the time period specified, may result in offsets to the Letter of Credit in accordance with § 277.16(c).
[Amdt. 168, 45 FR 77263, Nov. 21, 1980, as amended by Amdt. 262, 49 FR 50598, Dec. 31, 1984; Amdt. 356, 59 FR 29713, June 9, 1994]
EXHIBIT 32.2



SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ruths Chris Steak House, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 26, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas J. Pennison, Jr., Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



October 14, 2005



/s/ Thomas J. Pennison, Jr.Thomas J. Pennison, Jr.Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary




A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has
been provided to Ruths Chris Steak House, Inc. and will be retained by Ruths Chris Steak House, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1944

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1944 appear at 80 FR 9885, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1944.416 Grant closing.

The grant is closed on the date the Agreement is executed as defined in § 1944.403(a) by the applicant and the Government. Funds may not be advanced prior to the signing of the Agreement. The District Director or Assistant District Director are authorized to execute the Agreement for Rural Development. Person(s) authorized by resolution may sign for the applicant.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.76

Steven Gillis, Ph.D.
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer

Michelle Burris
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

David Fanning
Senior Vice President, Chief Operating Officer

Greg Cox
Treasurer

Cindy Jacobs, M.D., Ph.D.
Senior Vice President, Chief Medical Officer

Kathleen McKereghan Deeley
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

Martin A. Cheever, M.D.
Vice President, Medical Affairs

Gary Christianson
Vice President, Technical Operations

Bernie Paul
Vice President, Human Resources

Russell Hawkinson
Vice President, Corporate Finance

Monica Krieger
Vice President, Regulatory Affairs

Vaughn Himes, Ph.D.
Vice President, Worldwide Manufacturing

David Persing, M.D., Ph.D.
Senior Vice President, Chief Scientific Officer
Fact Sheet Fact Sheet

The President’s Fiscal 2001 Immigration Budget 

2/7/00 

Construction 

The FY 2001 INS budget includes $77.1 million for a portion of the infrastructure 

requirements resulting from INS’ rapid growth in personnel and enforcement capability 

over the past seven years. In FY 2001, needed infrastructure projects are focused on 

construction of Border Patrol stations and detention facilities. 

FY 2001 Initiatives 

($ in thousands) 

Border Patrol Construction Projects Amount 

Texas 

Construction Projects 

Rio Grande City BP Station 

Sanderson BP Station 

Hebbronville BP Station 

Laredo Sector Checkpoint System (5 sites) 

Del Rio Sector Checkpoint System (5 sites) 

Subtotal 

$ 3,837 

3,880 

1,955 

400 

400 

10,472 

Planning/Site Development/Design 

McAllen, BP Station 

Port Isabel, BP Station 

El Paso, BP Station 

Eagle Pass, BP Station 

McAllen, BP Sector Headquarters 

Subtotal 

813 

500 

865 

834 

685 

3,697 

TOTAL, Texas $14,169 

California 

Construction Projects 

Temecula, BP Station 

Campo, BP Station 

El Centro, BP Station 

Subtotal 

$ 

5,000 

4,000 

14,373 

Planning/Site Development/Design 

El Cajon, BP Station $ 

TOTAL, California $14,680 

5,373 

307 

Prepared by the Office of Public Affairs • Immigration & Naturalization Service • (202) 514-2648 
FY 2000 INS Budget – Construction 

Page 2 

Border Construction Amount 

Arizona 

Construction Project 

Tucson, BP Station 

Douglas, BP Station 

Yuma, BP Station 

Yuma Sector Headquarters 

Subtotal 

$ 500 

8,000 

5,133 

4,000 

17,633 

Planning/Site Development/Design 

Tucson Sector Headquarters $ 520 

TOTAL, Arizona $18,153 

Border Infrastructure $ 3,300 

TOTAL $50,302 

Detention Construction Projects Amount 

Texas 

Construction Projects 

Port Isabel SPC: 200-bed dorms (two) 

Port Isabel SPC Phase 2 

(process/infirmary/security command) 

Subtotal 

$ 6,400 

4,000 

10,400 

Planning/Site Development/Design 

Port Isabel SPC Phase One A 

El Paso SPC Secure & Isolation Dorms 

Subtotal 

$1,500 

1,149 

2,649 

TOTAL, Texas $13,049 

Florida 

Construction Projects 

Krome SPC admin/EOIR Bldg $ 9,500 

Planning/Site Development/Design 

Krome SPC Admin & Site Infrastructure $ 1,184 

TOTAL, Florida $10,684 
FY 2000 INS Budget – Construction 

Page 3 

California 

Construction Projects 

San Pedro SPC Maint/Electronic Shop 

Upgrade 

$ 800 

Planning/Site Development/Design 

El Centro SPC Expansion Projects Phase One $ 300 

TOTAL, California $1,100 

TOTAL Detention Construction $24,833 

Repairs and Alterations $2,000 

TOTAL $77,135
Third Department,

April, 1969

(April 18, 1969)

#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between William Frame, Respondent, and American Motorists Insurance Company, Appellant. Motor Vehicle Accident Idemnification Corporation, Intervenor-Respondent.

Motion for reargument granted, without costs, and upon reargument, we adhere to our original determination reversing the order appealed from and remitting the matter to 'Special Term to determine whether or not the infant Mark Frame falls within the scope of the uninsured motorist protection afforded by appellant’s policy. Our alternative holding is deleted since it now appears for the first time .that an order permitting submission of the infant’s claim to arbitration was obtained albeit not until after service of the demand for arbitration. We do not pass upon the question whether the service of the demand for arbitration under these circumstances was proper. Motion for permission to appeal .to the Court of Appeals denied, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Aulisi, Staley, Jr., Cooke and Greenblott, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Barge Line Company (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christopher A. Black, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations ofthe Company.     /s/ Christopher A. BlackNovember10, 2005 Christopher A. Black  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Page 1 of 2

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

DALE A. CASTRO,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:20cv2337/LAC/EMT

WARDEN C. MAIORANA,

Defendant.

__________________________/

O R D E R

The Chief Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation on May

19, 2020 (ECF No. 5). Plaintiff was furnished a copy of the Report and

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title

28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined it

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The Chief Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No.

5) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

Case 3:20-cv-02337-LC-EMT Document 6 Filed 06/17/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

2. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim

upon which relief may be granted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and

§ 1915A(b)(1); and

3. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close

the case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 17th

 day of June, 2020.

 s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No. 3:20cv2337/LAC/EMT

Case 3:20-cv-02337-LC-EMT Document 6 Filed 06/17/20 Page 2 of 2
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsRecent progress in research pertaining to estimates of gas-side heat transfer in an aircraft gas turbineA decade ago several important fundamental heat transfer phenomena were identified which were considered basic to the ability to predict heat transfer loads in aircraft gas turbines. The progress in addressing these fundamentals over the past ten years is assessed. Much reseach effort has been devoted to their study in university, industry and government labs and significant progress has been achieved. Advances in computer technology have enabled the modeling of complex 3-D fluid flow in gas turbines so necessary for heat transfer calculations. Advances in instrumentation plus improved data acquisition have brought about more reliable data sets. While much has advanced in the 1980's, much challenging research remains to be done. Several of these areas are suggested.Document ID19900004078Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsGraham, Robert W.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1989Subject CategoryAircraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-102460E-5247NAS 1.15:102460Meeting InformationMeeting: Turbo ExpoLocation: BrusselsCountry: BelgiumStart Date: June 11, 1990End Date: June 14, 1990Sponsors:ASMEAccession Number90N13394Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900004078.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 247.23 State provision of administrative funds to local agencies. ( a ) *How much of the administrative funds must State agencies provide to local agencies for their use?* The State agency must provide to local agencies for their use all administrative funds it receives, except that the State agency may retain for its own use the amount determined by the following formula: ( 1 ) 15 percent of the first $50,000 received;
( 2 ) 10 percent of the next $100,000 received;
( 3 ) 5 percent of the next $250,000 received; and
( 4 ) A maximum of $30,000, if the administrative grant exceeds $400,000.
( b ) *May a State agency request to retain more than the amount determined by the above formula in the event of special needs?* Yes, the State agency may request approval from FNS to retain a larger amount than is allowed under the formula prescribed in paragraph (a) of this section. However, in making its request, the State agency must provide justification of the need for the larger amount at the State level, and must ensure that local agencies will not suffer undue hardship as a result of a reduction in administrative funds.
( c ) *How must the State agency distribute funds among local agencies?* The State agency must distribute funds among local agencies on the basis of their respective needs, and in a manner that ensures the funds will be used to achieve program objectives.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0584-0293)
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, Richard R. Woolcott, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Volcom, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: November 11, 2005 /s/ Richard R. Woolcott   Richard R. Woolcott   President, Chief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2239 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2239

   To reduce the number of Federal judgeships for the U.S. Court of 
             Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 4, 2013

  Mr. Cotton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To reduce the number of Federal judgeships for the U.S. Court of 
             Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop Court-Packing Act''.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF FEDERAL JUDGESHIPS FOR U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR 
              THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT.

    The table contained in section 44(a) of title 28, United States 
Code, is amended in the item relating to the District of Columbia 
circuit court of appeals, by striking ``11'' and inserting ``8''.
                                 <all>
```
98-1672.

#### Bowersock v. Bowersock.

Allen App. No. 1-98-10. On motion for stay of common pleas court proceedings. Motion denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE ANNUAL
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF UNUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH CONTAINED IN UNUM CORPORATION'S
SEC FORM 10-K DATED DECEMBER 31, 1995.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         9,135,400
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      25,200
<MORTGAGE>                                   1,163,400
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  222,200
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              11,692,500
<CASH>                                          42,500
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                       1,142,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,787,800
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              6,575,100
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        3,840,300
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                583,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,292,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,787,800
<PREMIUMS>                                   3,018,200
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            806,300
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             225,100
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  73,300
<BENEFITS>                                   2,493,000
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                  (114,700)<F1>
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                381,900
<INCOME-TAX>                                   100,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            281,100
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   281,100
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
<FN>
<F1>THIS ITEM CONTAINS THE AMOUNTS OF DEFERRED AND AMORTIZED POLICY ACQUISITION
COSTS FOR THE PERIOD PRESENTED.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>