alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31(a) CERTIFICATIONS CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER I, Michael J. Quillen, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q (this Report) of Alpha NR Holding, Inc.
(the Registrant);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this Report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
Report;4.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared; b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation;
and c. Disclosed in this Report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial
reporting;  5.
    
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting. /s/ Michael J. Quillen
Michael J. QuillenPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) Date: June 27, 2005
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 12

                        UNUM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

                              (DOLLARS IN MILLIONS)



                                                   Year Ended December 31,
                                                 --------------------------
                                                  1995      1994      1993
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EARNINGS:
  Income from continuing operations before
   income taxes                                  $381.9    $198.6    $460.3
Add:
  Fixed charges                                    48.0      29.6      24.2
                                                 ------    ------    ------
Earnings as adjusted                             $429.9    $228.2    $484.5
                                                 ------    ------    ------
                                                 ------    ------    ------


FIXED CHARGES:
  Interest expense                               $ 37.2    $ 18.7    $ 12.7
  Interest portion of rent expense                 10.8      10.9      11.5
                                                 ------    ------    ------
Total fixed charges                              $ 48.0    $ 29.6    $ 24.2
                                                 ------    ------    ------
                                                 ------    ------    ------

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES                  9.0       7.7      20.0
                                                 ------    ------    ------
                                                 ------    ------    ------



For purposes of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, earnings as
adjusted consist of income from continuing operations before income taxes plus
fixed charges.  Fixed charges consist of interest expense and the estimated
interest portion of rent expense.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter C of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter C appear by Amdt. 381, 65 FR 64586, Oct. 30, 2000.

###### Editorial Note on Part 275

#### Editorial Note:

OMB control numbers relating to this part 275 are contained in § 271.8.

#### § 275.8 Review coverage.

(a) During each review period, State agencies shall review the national target areas of program operation specified by FNS. FNS will notify State agencies of the minimum program areas to be reviewed at least 90 days before the beginning of each annual review period, which is the Federal fiscal year. FNS may add additional areas during the review period if deemed necessary. The FNS headquarters office will add national target areas during the review period only for deficiencies of national scope. State agencies have 60 days in which to establish a plan schedule for such reviews.

(b) State agencies shall be responsible for reviewing each national target area or other program requirement based upon the provisions of the regulations governing SNAP and the FNS-approved Plan of Operation. If FNS approves a State agency's request for a waiver from a program requirement, any different policy approved by FNS would also be reviewed. When, in the course of a review, a project area is found to be out of compliance with a given program requirement, the State agency shall identify the specifics of the problem including: the extent of the deficiency, the cause of the deficiency, and, as applicable, the specific procedural requirements the project area is misapplying.

[Amdt. 266, 52 FR 3408, Feb. 4, 1987, as amended by Amdt. 356, 59 FR 29713, June 9, 1994]
CERTIFICATION



I, Bruce Hollingshead, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officers, if any, and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I (we) have:



(a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (Evaluation Date); and

(c)

presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrants other certifying officers, if any, and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



(a)

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

(b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and



6.

The registrants other certifying officers, if any, and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were any significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.







/s/ Bruce Hollingshead

Date: January 18, 2008

Bruce Hollingshead, President/Director

Chief Executive Officer
STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

CHADWICK TATE

NO. 2024 KW 0266

MAY 20, 2024

In Re: Chadwick Tate, applying for supervisory writs, 19th

Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, 

No. 12- 92- 0660. 

BEFORE: McCLENDON, HESTER, AND MILLER, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. 

T OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

Y CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT

PMC

CHH

SMM
IB 

Union Calendar No. 117 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2353 

[Report No. 113–162] 

To amend title 23, United States Code, with respect to the operation of 

vehicles on certain Wisconsin highways, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 13, 2013 

Mr. PETRI (for himself and Mr. RIBBLE) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

JULY 22, 2013 

Additional sponsors: Mr. KIND, Mr. RYAN of Wisconsin, Ms. MOORE, Mr. 

DUFFY, and Mr. POCAN

JULY 22, 2013 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2353 RH

A BILL 

To amend title 23, United States Code, with respect to 

the operation of vehicles on certain Wisconsin highways, 

and for other purposes. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2353 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. OPERATION OF VEHICLES ON CERTAIN WIS4 CONSIN HIGHWAYS. 

5 Section 127 of title 23, United States Code, is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(j) OPERATION OF VEHICLES ON CERTAIN WIS8 CONSIN HIGHWAYS.—If any segment of the United States 

9 Route 41 corridor, as described in section 1105(c)(57) of 

10 the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 

11 1991, is designated as a route on the Interstate System, 

12 a vehicle that could operate legally on that segment before 

13 the date of such designation may continue to operate on 

14 that segment, without regard to any requirement under 

15 subsection (a).’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 117 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2353 

[Report No. 113–162] 

A BILL 

To amend title 23, United States Code, with reconsin highways, and for other purposes. spect to the operation of vehicles on certain WisJULY 22, 2013 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### § 29.3004 Body.

The thickness and density of a leaf or the weight per unit of surface. (See Elements of quality.)
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter C of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter C appear by Amdt. 381, 65 FR 64586, Oct. 30, 2000.

#### § 283.28 Discovery.

Upon motion and as ordered by the ALJ, written interrogatories, written requests for admissions and written requests for the production of documents, may be served by any party to the appeal upon any other party and used in accordance with § 283.12(b).
NO. 03-15-00208-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT AUSTIN, TEXAS
JOE ALTON GREER, 

### Appellant, VS. REBECCA RODRIGUEZ GREER, 

### Appellee. Appeal from the 425th Judicial District Court 

### ofWilliamson County, Texas
MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS: 

### Pursuantto Rule 42 ofthe Texas Rules ofAppellate Procedure, Appellant, Joe Alton Greer, moves to dismiss this appeal on the following grounds:

Greer v. Greer Motion to Dismiss Appeal Page 1 ACCEPTED

03-15-00208-CV 5145191 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 5/4/2015 4:38:55 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERKA. Introduction 

### 1. Appellant perfected hisappeal on7 April 2015, when hefiled aNotice of Appeal with the 425th Judicial District Court ofWilliamson County, Texas. The judgment from which 

### the appeal was taken was entered on 7 January 2015 in Cause No. 12-1050-F425, styledIn 

### the Matter of the Marriage ofJoe Alton Greer and Rebecca Rodriguez Greer, in the 425th Judicial District Court ofWilliamson County, Texas. B. Grounds 

### 2. On 22 April 2015, the trial court granted a new trial in this case and signed an Order on Petitioner's Motionfor New Trial setting aside thejudgment entered on 7 January 2015. C. Conclusion 

### 3. In light ofthe granting ofthe new trial in this case, this appeal is moot and should be dismissed. D. Prayer 

### 4. For these reasons, the Appellant ask the Court to grant this motion to dismiss.

Greer v. Greer Motion to Dismiss Appeal Page 2

### Respectfully Submitted, LAW OFFICE OF KARL E. HAYS, PLLC 2101 South lH-35, Suite 210 Austin, Texas 78741 512-476-1911 512-476-1904 facsimile service@havsfamilvlaw.com By: /s/ Karl E. Havs Karl E. Hays State Bar Number 09307050 ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT
CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE 

### Pursuant to Rule 10.1(a)(5) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the 

### undersigned attorney hereby certifies that he has conferred with Appellee's counsel regarding the substance of this motion and that Appellee's counsel has indicated that he does not oppose the granting ofthis motion.
/s/ Karl E. Havs 

### Karl E. Hays

Greer v. Greer Motion to Dismiss Appeal Page 3Certificate of Service 

### In compliance with Rule 9.5(a), 9.5(d), and 9.5(e) ofthe Texas Rules ofAppellate Procedure, the undersigned attorney certifies that a true and correct copy ofthe foregoing Motion to Dismiss Appeal has been served upon the below-named individual, in the manner noted below, as prescribed by Rule 9.5(b) ofthe Texas Rules ofAppellate Procedure on this 4th day ofMay 2015.

Via E-File Transmission 

### Bradley M. Coldwell Coldwell Bowes, L.L.P. 

### 919 Congress Ave., Suite 1200 Austin, Texas 78701 Efiling.coldwell@coldwellbowes.com Is! Karl E. Havs 

### Karl E. Hays

Greer v. Greer Motion to Dismiss Appeal Page 4
#### § 1700.56 Water and Environmental Programs.

The State Rural Development Offices have the responsibility for making and servicing water and waste loans and grants.
THAI • APRIL 2004
53

5'4"

5'5"

5'6"

5'7"

5'8"

5'9"

5'10"

5'11"

6'0"

6'1"

6'2"

6'3"

6'4"

141

145

150

155

159

164

169

174

179

184

189

194

200

205

53

5'4"

5'5"

5'6"

5'7"

5'8"

5'9"

5'10"

5'11"

6'0"

6'1"

6'2"

6'3"

6'4"

130

134

138

142

146

151

155

160

165

169

174

179

184

189

53

5'4"

5'5"

5'6"

5'7"

5'8"

5'9"

5'10"

5'11"

6'0"

6'1"

6'2"

6'3"

6'4"

146

151

156

161

166

171

176

181

186

191

197

202

208

213

NIH Publication No. 04-5524 THAI • APRIL 2004

NDEP-74TH
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cascade Technologies Corp.  (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Daniel L. Farkas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: August 16, 2010  /s/ Daniel L. FarkasName:Daniel L. FarkasTitle:Chief Executive Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cascade Technologies Corp.  and will be retained by Cascade Technologies Corp.  and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.   *This certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
#### § 29.9266 Changes or alterations.

No change or alteration shall be made in the weight or other identification of a lot on the Tobacco Classification Certificate after the certification of class or type, and any such change or alteration shall constitute and be construed as a change or alteration in the certificate issued or authorized under the act.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 21, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-10864 Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee
v. HILARIO AYALA-GANDARIA Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:06-CR-18-ALL Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to represent Hilario Ayala-Gandaria (Ayala) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Ayala has filed a response. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Ayala’s claim of ineffective assistance ofcounsel. See United States v. Cantwell , 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006). Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, andNo. 06-10864

2 Ayala’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
97-1316.

#### Disciplinary Counsel v. Jackson.

On June 26, 1997, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline filed its final report with this court recommending that respondent, Jonathan Michael Jackson, be permanently disbarred. On April 1, 1998, the court remanded this matter to the board for further evidentiary proceedings. On August 20, 1998, respondent filed a Notice of Interlocutory Appeal and Request for Stay of Proceedings, and on August 28, 1998, relator filed a motion to strike respondent’s Notice of Interlocutory Appeal and Request for Stay of Proceedings. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that relator’s motion to strike be, and hereby is, granted, and that respondent’s Notice of Interlocutory Appeal and Request for Stay of Proceedings be, and hereby is, stricken.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>     0000793322
<NAME>    PSS,Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS        
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                NOV-02-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                        239
<SECURITIES>                  3,700
<RECEIVABLES>                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              0
<PP&E>                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                3,984
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         3,549
<BONDS>                       39,891
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      0
<OTHER-SE>                    (39,456)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  3,549
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              270
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              (94)
<LOSS-PROVISION>              (2,265)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            (2,490)
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (2,265)
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (2,265)
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (2,265)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                 0
<EPS-DILUTED>                 0
        

</TABLE>
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. Case No: 3:97cr78/RV

3:05cv189/RV/MD

GHASSEN GEORGE MOUREY

_____________________________________________________________________

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and

recommendation dated January 3, 2006. The defendant previously has been

furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section

636(b)(1), and I have made a de novo determination of those portions to which an

objection has been made.

Having considered the report and recommendation and all objections thereto

timely filed by the parties, I have determined that the report and recommendation

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The defendant’s motion to vacate his sentence (doc. 96) is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 1st day of February, 2006.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:97-cr-00078-RV-MD Document 116 Filed 02/01/06 Page 1 of 1
George L.



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

January 15, 2014

N o. 04

- 12

- 00755

- CV

Roger L . GRAHAM , John B. Graham, John Regmund, Glenn Regmund, Wilma Regmund, Raellen Regmund Matt ingly, Rayanne Regmund Chesser, Albert O. Menn, and Irene C. Menn, Appellant s

v.

George L. PROCHASKA , Jr., Patricia Prochaska Holland, Jeanette Prochaska Mazza, Dawn Prochaska Snyder, Frederick James Prochaska, II and Rebecca Prochaska Willis, Appellee s

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Karnes County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12

- 02

- 00023

- CVK Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant’s Unopposed Motion to Extend Time to File Motion for Rehearing or

Reconsideration En Banc is GRAN TED. The motion is due on February 14, 2014.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto s et my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 15th day of January, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court