alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2006-0600.

#### Ohio Consumers’ Counsel v. Pub. Util. Comm.

Public Utilities Commission, No. 04-1932-EL-ATA. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Public Utilities Commission. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion to consolidate 2005- 1621, *Ohio Consumers’ Counsel v. Pub. Util. Comm.,*Public Utilities Commission, No. 04-1931-EL-AAM, 2005-1679, *Ohio Consumers’ Counsel v. Pub. Util. Comm.,*Public Utilities Commission, No. 04-1645-EL-AAM, 2006-0536, *Ohio Consumers’ Counsel v. Pub. Util. Comm.,*Public Utilities Commission, No. 05-844-EL-ATA, and 2006-0600, *Ohio Consumers’ Counsel v. Pub. Util. Comm.,*Public Utilities Commission, No. 04-1932-EL-ATA,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this cause be consolidated with 2006-0536, *Ohio Consumers’ Counsel v. Pub. Util. Comm.,*Public Utilities Commission, No. 05-844-EL-ATA, and briefing is stayed.
EXHIBIT “A”

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3654-1 Filed 01/31/23 Page 1 of 2
Exhibit A

List of Transferred Cases

 

 Berry v. 3M Company 3:19-cv-00680 

 Biggers, et al. v. 3M Company 3:19-cv-00672 

 Doyle v. 3M Company 3:19-cv-00683 

 Glover v. 3M Company 3:19-cv-00846 

 Hernandez, et al. v. 3M Company 3:19-cv-00679 

 Ivanisin, et al. v. 3M Company 3:19-cv-00671 

 Johnson, et al. v. 3M Company 3:19-cv-00674 

 Kennedy v 3M Company 3:19-cv-00550 

 Maxwell, et al. v. 3M Company 3:19-cv-00673 

 Mays v. 3M Company 3:19-cv-00744 

 Milstead v. 3M Company 3:19-cv-00682 

 Morgan, et al v. 3M Company 3:19-cv-00681 

 Nordlof v. 3M Company 3:19-cv-00741 

 Pennington v. 3M Company 3:19-cv-00742 

 Schroeter v. 3M Company 3:19-cv-00795 

 Schonfeld v. 3M Company 3:19-cv-00743 

 

 

 

 

 

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3654-1 Filed 01/31/23 Page 2 of 2
Case 3:20-cv-03678-MCR-ZCB Document 69-1 Filed 11/28/22 Page 1 of 9
Case 3:20-cv-03678-MCR-ZCB Document 69-1 Filed 11/28/22 Page 2 of 9
Case 3:20-cv-03678-MCR-ZCB Document 69-1 Filed 11/28/22 Page 3 of 9
&9)*#*5"

Case 3:20-cv-03678-MCR-ZCB Document 69-1 Filed 11/28/22 Page 4 of 9

		
		
	




	



 !
! 
*('*,d). + ,!'&d ##d

	


 


!! !!!

d&d'$!2d*'d


!! !!!

%!*%*dd#d 
d /+d

!	!! 
!	!!

d&	d'$!2d*'d

%!*%*dd#d 
d /+d


	
 R%PC48HRFF@<86R EHRR R R%PC48IR%EMRFFA=524A8RR R 8HM<;52M8RE:R+M2MPKR8K=H86RR R


!!!!!!! 
!!!!
!!!

%($#d+'-,d%d

d%*$d'+,d("12d

+. -dd

+- &d $d 
d /+d

-B;d36O_;dM3K;:d;M\C\bdY^6KC\Yd\BCYdY\3\;K;M[d=OTd\B;dQ^TQOY;dO>d8B3MADMAdC\YdU;ADY\;V;:dO?D8;dOTdT;ACY\;U;:d3A;M\dOUd6O\Bd

CMd\B<d+\4\<dP=dGPWE:4	d

+!&-0*d

G<9\WPMC9d+CAM4\^W<dP>d*<ACZ]<X<:dA<M\d

	

!		
	

!

->NB9R

&3D9R

77J9LLR

>NQ,O1?GR

$*$R

,.*"!&R /*,! R""R

)(,.R( R(0R

R

,- 'R #R 
	R

4\<d

 dB<X<7bd9<W\E>bd\B4\d\B<dEM>PWL4\EPMdEM:F94\<:dPNd\BEZdW<RPW\dFZd\W^<d4M:d499^W4\<d4M:d\B4\dLbd<H<9\XPMF9dZEAM4\^X<dZB4GHdB4_<d

\B<dZ4K<dI<A4Hd<@<9\d4ZdF=dK4:<d^M:<WdP4\Bd\B5\d d4Kd4dL4M4AFMAdL<L7<WdPWdL4M4A<XdP>d\B<dGFKE\<:dGC47EGF\bd9PKR4MbdPWd\B<d

U<9<C_<WdPWd\W^Z\<<d<LQP`<U<:d\Pd<a<9^\<d\BEZdU<QPX\d4ZdU<S^FU<:d7bdB4Q\<WddGPWF:4d+\4\^<Z	d

+!&,0*d , %',2d1*+d %*%d 



d

J<9\XPME9d+EAM4\^X<dP>d+FAMEMAd%4M4AFMAd%;L7<Xd %4M4A<Wd PWd^\BPWEc<:d*<RW<Z<M\4\F_< 
d4\;d

&9)*#*5#

Case 3:20-cv-03678-MCR-ZCB Document 69-1 Filed 11/28/22 Page 5 of 9
	







 4Xl4adSYat+H4	t

32Z4bct

33[4aat

=er!e+f4$=U<TL4t	t

" 

ma>M5aatNg=jst+I4
t

S.nJ4OetoK-4\
t

 

4_>8C43tSV?4at%&t't 4`>7D/,h4atS7t!i+epat()t*t

!W40>+EtPaj]q0j>SQatkSt @FAR;t97=14^
t

:B.4t#a6tLGst





	
  


 

 





 




 

  






	


























	

 

			

    















&9)*#*5$

Case 3:20-cv-03678-MCR-ZCB Document 69-1 Filed 11/28/22 Page 6 of 9
Case 3:20-cv-03678-MCR-ZCB Document 69-1 Filed 11/28/22 Page 7 of 9
Case 3:20-cv-03678-MCR-ZCB Document 69-1 Filed 11/28/22 Page 8 of 9
Case 3:20-cv-03678-MCR-ZCB Document 69-1 Filed 11/28/22 Page 9 of 9
#### The State ex rel. Duboise, Appellant, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellee.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Duboise v. Indus. Comm.*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 121.]

(No. 96-2750

Submitted July 15, 1998

Decided September 16, 1998.)

*Stewart Jajfy & Associates Co., L.P.A., Stewart R. Jajfy*and *Marc J. Jajfy; Pavick & Pavick*and *Dean G. Pavick,*for appellant.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Jonathan A. Good,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Douglas and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Resnick, J., dissents.

Alice Robie Resnick, J.,

dissenting. I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.
EXHIBIT 13.2

              SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                        THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*

In connection with the annual report of Widescope Resources Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  20-F  for the  period  ending  December  31,  2007 as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Edward
D. Ford,  Director and acting Chief Accounting Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  the  Report  containing  the  financial  statements  of the  Company  fully
     complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
     the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 23, 2008


/s/ Edward D. Ford
--------------------------------------------
Edward D. Ford
Director and acting Chief Accounting Officer

* A signed original of this written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 1280.209 Removal.

If the Secretary determines that any person appointed under this part fails or refuses to perform his or her duties properly or engages in acts of dishonesty or willful misconduct, the Secretary shall remove the person from office. A person appointed under this part or any employee of the Board may be removed by the Secretary if the Secretary determines that the person's continued service would be detrimental to the purposes of the Act.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

)

INDEPENDENT PARTY OF )

FLORIDA and PARTY FOR )

SOCIALISM AND LIBERATION, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) Case No. 4:20-cv-00110-MW-CAS

)

LAUREL M. LEE, Florida )

Secretary of State, in her official )

capacity, )

)

Defendant. )

)

DECLARATION OF ERNEST BACH

I, Ernest Bach, hereby declare that:

1. I make this declaration based on my own personal knowledge and 

am competent to testify to the matters stated herein.

2. The Independent Party of Florida has not yet chosen its 

candidates for President and Vice President. The Independent Party 

has been contacted by numerous individuals seeking the Independent 

Party’s nomination, and is narrowing their search of those potential 

candidates.

Case 4:20-cv-00110-MW-MAF Document 35-2 Filed 05/29/20 Page 1 of 3
2

3. The State of Florida revoked the Independent Party’s official 

minor party status in 2016. We immediately refiled paperwork to reregister the party. I do not believe revocation was appropriate, but the 

party documents were re-filed.

4. At the time of the revocation, the Independent Party had 262,599 

registered voters. When the revocation occurred, the State had those 

voter’s registration converted to “No Party Affiliation.”

5. Since re-filing the paperwork, the Independent Party now has

over 106,000 definitively registered voters again, more than twice the 

number of all other Florida minor parties combined.

6. The bylaws filed by The Independent Party in January 2017 were 

merely a re-draft of the bylaws the Department of State previously 

accepted. The language citing Fla. Stat. § 103.021(4)(b) in Article 8 of 

the bylaws, which is the section articulating how the party will choose 

its Presidential candidates and electors, was not The Independent 

Party’s intended language.

7. In 2011, when the bylaws were proposed, the original 

submission cited both § 103.021(4)(a) and (4)(b). The Department of 

State responded and told The Independent Party that because they 

Case 4:20-cv-00110-MW-MAF Document 35-2 Filed 05/29/20 Page 2 of 3
3

were not a “national party,” the bylaws could only cite to § 

103.021(4)(b), and the Department required an amended submission 

before the bylaws would be accepted.

8. The bylaws were submitted in 2011 pursuant to Fla. Stat. § 

103.095. That statute required minor political parties to file certain 

documents with the Department of State, including bylaws, and § 

103.095(6) required compliance with then existing minor political 

parties.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746, I declare under penalty of perjury the 

foregoing is true and correct to the best of my information, knowledge 

and belief.

Dated: May 28, 2020.

Ernest Bach

Ernest Bach

Case 4:20-cv-00110-MW-MAF Document 35-2 Filed 05/29/20 Page 3 of 3
Salary Information for Named Executive Officers



  
 EXHIBIT 10.39

  
 SALARY INFORMATION FOR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

  
 The table below provides information regarding the current annual salary
and 2005 target bonus amount for each “named executive officer” of Exelixis, Inc. (“Exelixis”) as of March 1, 2005. All other compensation arrangements between Exelixis and each of its named executive officers are referenced in
the Exhibit Index to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 
  

					
	Named Executive Officer

	 	Annual Salary

	 	 Target Bonus Amount
 (percentage of annual salary)


	George Scangos	 	$675,000	 	60%
	Jeffrey Latts	 	$365,729	 	35%
	Michael Morrissey	 	$359,856	 	35%
	Frank Karbe	 	$325,500	 	45%
	Pamela Simonton	 	$301,111	 	35%
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0151

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

RICHARD HAROLD VIERECK,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including February 21, 2023, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 11 2023

01/11/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0151
#### § 210.33 OMB control numbers.

The following control numbers have been assigned to the information collection requirements in [7 CFR part 210](/on/2024-09-16/title-7/part-210) by the Office of Management and Budget pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Public Law 96-511.

| 7 CFR section where requirements are described | Current OMB control No. |
| --- | --- |
| 210.3(b) | 0584-0067 |
| 210.4(b) | 0584-0002 |
| 210.5(d) | 0584-0006; 0584-0002; 0584-0067; 0584-0567 (to be merged with 0584-0006) |
| 210.7 | 0584-0567 (to be merged with 0584-0006) |
| 210.8 | 0584-0284; 0584-0006 |
| 210.9 | 0584-0006 |
| 210.10 | 0584-0006; 0584-0494 |
| 210.11 | 0584-0576 (to be merged with 0584-0006) |
| 210.13 | 0584-0006 |
| 210.14 | 0584-0006 |
| 210.15 | 0584-0006 |
| 210.17 | 0584-0075 |
| 210.18 | 0584-0006 |
| 210.19 | 0584-0006 |
| 210.20 | 0584-0006; 0584-0002; 0584-0067 |
| 210.23 | 0584-0006 |

[[80 FR 11092](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/80-FR-11092), Mar. 2, 2015. Redesignated at [81 FR 50169](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/81-FR-50169), July 29, 2016]
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 21.2


                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

The following is a list of each subsidiary of the Company, its jurisdiction of
organization, and the percentage ownership held by the Company.

COMPANIES ORGANIZED IN THE UNITED STATES:

EPE Holding Corporation - Delaware - 100%
Elvis Presley Enterprises, Inc. - Tennessee - 85%
Elvis Presley Enterprises LLC - Delaware 85%
Elvis Presley's Memphis LLC - Tennessee - 85%
Elvis Anthology, LLC - Tennessee - 85%
Meadow Oaks Apartments, Inc. - Tennessee -  85%
Elvis Presley's Heartbreak Hotel, LLC - Tennessee - 99%
Elvis Music, Inc. - New York - 63.75%
White Haven Music, Inc. - New York - 63.75%
Velvet Elvis, Inc. - Tennessee -  85%
19 Entertainment Inc. - New York - 100%
On The Road Productions Inc. - California 100%
All Girl Productions Inc. - California -100%
19 Touring LLC - Delaware - 100%
Dance Nation Productions Inc. - Delaware - 100%
Southside Productions Inc. - Delaware -  100%
19 Recording Services Inc. - Delaware - 100%
19 Recordings Inc.  - New York - 100%

COMPANIES REGISTERED IN ENGLAND AND WALES:

19 Entertainment Limited -  100%
19 Merchandising Limited -100%
S Club Limited - 100%
19 TV Limited  - 100%
19 Recordings Limited  - 100%
19 Management Limited - 100%
19 Productions Limited  - 100%
Brilliant 19 Limited  - 75%
Native Management Limited - 50%
19 Songs Limited - 50%
19 Touring Limited - 100%
TLS Management Limited - 25%
Double Vision Film Limited - 100%
19 Loves Music Limited - 100%
19 Artist Tours Limited - 100%
Beckham Brand Limited - 33%
Shy Records Limited - 75%

COMPANIES REGISTERED IN GERMANY:

19 Entertainment (Germany) GmbH - 100%
19 Touring GmbH - 100%
(115 App. Div. 571)

#### ETTINGHOFF et al. v. HOROWITZ.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

November 16, 1906.)

Brokers—Commissions—Sale Effected Without Their Aid.

Brokers were not entitled to a commission for procuring a customer for their principal’s real estate, where he sold the premises to another before they produced their customer.

[Ed. Note.—For cases in point, see vol. 8, Cent. Dig. Brokers, §§ 45, 47, 68.]

Hooker, J., dissenting.

Appeal from Municipal Court of New York.

Action by Louis Ettinghoff and another against Henry Horowitz. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

Argued before HIRSCHBERG, P. J., and WOODWARD, HOOKER, RICH, and MILLER, JJ.

Jerome H. Buck, for appellants.

Charles Bienenfeld, for respondent.

WOODWARD, J.

This is an action for broker’s commissions alleged to have been earned by the plaintiffs in procuring a customer ready, willing, and able to purchase upon the defendant’s terms. There does not seem to be any dispute that the plaintiffs produced a proper customer, but the defendant claims that at the time the customer was produced he had contracted to sell the premises to another, and the learned court below appears to have believed his testimony upon this point. There was no conflict of evidence upon this point, and there is no evidence to show that the defendant acted in bad faith in selling the premises before the plaintiffs had produced their customer, and we are of opinion that in the absence of such evidence a broker is not entitled to commissions. If he were, then every owner of premises who employed more than one broker might be held liable for commissions without number, if the several brokers should produce customers after the premises had been sold. We think that a broker must produce his customer while the premises are in the market; that the owner does not contract to hold them for the customer to be produced by the broker, but that, acting in good faith, he may sell the premises at any time and to any customer who is willing to buy upon his terms; and that commissions may not be collected for customers produced after the premises have been sold.

The judgment appealed from should be affirmed, with costs. All concur, except HOOKER, J., who dissents.
CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I, Robert
Genesi, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form
10-KSB of GTDATA Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2004 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of GTDATA Corporation.
 
 By:  /s/
Robert Genesi
 _____________________________
 Name:  Robert
Genesi
 Title:  Chief
Executive Officer,
 Chief
Financial Officer
 
 
 Date:  April 15,
2005
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATIONS OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PUSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PUSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Eugene J. Pian, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Restated
Annual Report of SETO Holdings Inc. on Form 10-KSB, for the year ended January
31, 2001 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that all information contained in such
Annual Report of SETO Holdings Inc., on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of SETO
Holdings Inc.

| |                                                                                                                    
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | By: /s/ Eugene J. PianName:  Eugene J. Pian
Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer
Date:  September 18, 2003

I, Craig A. Pian, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Restated
Annual Report of SETO Holdings Inc. on Form 10-KSB, for the year ended January
31, 2001 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that all information contained in such
Annual Report of SETO Holdings Inc., on Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of SETO
Holdings Inc.

| |                                                                                                                                 
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | By: /s/ Craig A. PianName:  Craig A. Pian
Title:  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Date:  September 18, 2003
#### § 29.2310 Type.

A division of a class of tobacco having certain common characteristics and closely related grades. Tobacco which has the same characteristics and corresponding qualities, colors, and lengths is classified as one type, regardless of any factors of historical or geographical nature which cannot be determined by an examination of the tobacco.

[37 FR 13521, July 11, 1972. Redesignated at 51 FR 40406, Nov. 7, 1986]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)

**Title:**  Final report of the Special Master forthe September 11th Victim Compensation Fund of 2001, Volume 1, Volume2

 
SuDoc:�� J 1.2:SE 5/3����������� 
�Item Number: 0717 (online)
CGP system Number: 000574262
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
RESTATED TO REFLECT THE 1997 ACQUISITIONS OF WISCONSIN BANCORP AND CITIZENS
NATIONAL BANCORPORATION, INC.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          49,406
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             196
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                23,286
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    154,746
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          95,030
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            96,824
<LOANS>                                        970,554
<ALLOWANCE>                                     12,319
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 958,235
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,140,371
<SHORT-TERM>                                    42,263
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             12,869
<LONG-TERM>                                     18,194
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,173    
<OTHER-SE>                                     114,032
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,335,902
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 82,330
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               15,145
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,434
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                98,909
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              42,637
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              45,374
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           53,535
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    2,904
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  59
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 34,820
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,398
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      22,398
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,406
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.73
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.73
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.78
<LOANS-NON>                                     12,353
<LOANS-PAST>                                       434
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   216
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                10,060
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,513
<RECOVERIES>                                       281
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               12,319
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            12,319
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

CYNTHIA HOOGERHEYDE,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO.:

STARBUCKS CORPORATION, 

Defendant.

_________________________________/

DEFENDANT’S CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

Defendant STARBUCKS CORPORATION hereby submits the following Corporate 

Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Starbucks has no 

parent corporation and no publicly held corporation owns 10% or more of its stock. 

Dated: February 24, 2020. Respectfully submitted, 

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.

BY: /s/ Kimberly J. Doud 

Kimberly J. Doud, Esquire

Fla. Bar No.: 523771

Email: kdoud@littler.com

111 North Orange Ave., Suite 1750

Orlando, FL 32810

Telephone: 407.393.2900

Facsimile: 407.393.2929

Counsel for Defendant

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY certify that on the 24th day of February, 2020, I electronically filed the foregoing with 

the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system, which will send a notice of electronic filing to the 

following: Marie A. Mattox, Esquire, Marie A. Mattox, PA, 203 North Gadsden Street, Tallahassee, FL 

32303 – email: marie@mattoxlaw.com; marlene@mattoxlaw.com and michelle@mattoxlaw.com.

/s/Kimberly J. Doud

Kimberly J. Doud, Esq.

4827-4293-2916.1 055187.1000

Case 4:20-cv-00108-RH-MAF Document 3 Filed 02/24/20 Page 1 of 1