alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

CHASE ANDERSON ROMAGNANO,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:19cv3559/RV/EMT

CSL PLASMA,

Defendant.

_________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge’s 

Report and Recommendation dated December 26, 2019 (ECF No. 5). Plaintiff has

been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and afforded an 

opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 

636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined the 

Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for Plaintiff’s failure to 

state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 
Case No.: 3:19cv3559/RV/EMT

3. The Clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 23rd day of January, 2019.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
§ 250.52 Storage and inventory management of donated foods. ( a ) *General requirements.* The food service management company must meet the requirements for the safe storage and control of donated foods in § 250.14(a).
( b ) *Storage and inventory with commercially purchased foods.* The food service management company may store and inventory donated foods together with foods it has purchased commercially for the school food authority's use (unless specifically prohibited in the contract). It may store and inventory such foods together with other commercially purchased foods only to the extent that such a system ensures compliance with the requirements for the use of donated foods in § 250.51(d)—*i.e.,* use all donated beef and pork, and all end products in the food service, and use all other donated foods or commercially purchased foods of the same generic identity, of U.S. origin, and of equal or better quality than the donated foods, in the food service. Additionally, under cost-reimbursable contracts, the food service management company must ensure that its system of inventory management does not result in the recipient agency being charged for donated foods.
( c ) *Disposition of donated foods and credit reconciliation upon termination of the contract.* When a contract terminates, and is not extended or renewed, the food service management company must return all unused donated beef, pork, and processed end products, and must, at the recipient agency's discretion, return other unused donated foods. The recipient agency must ensure that the food service management company has credited it for the value of all donated foods received for use in the recipient agency's meal service in a school year or fiscal year, as applicable.
[81 FR 23111, Apr. 19, 2016]
Case 5:20-mj-00044-MJF Document 7 Filed 05/05/21 Page 1 of 2
Case 5:20-mj-00044-MJF Document 7 Filed 05/05/21 Page 2 of 2
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:99CR50/RV

PAUL EVERETTE CLAYTON

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Vinson on 04/07/2009 

Type of Motion/Pleading MOTION TO REDUCE SENTENCE PUSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 

3582(c)(2)

Filed by: Defendant on 2/19/09 Doc. No. 190

( ) Stipulated/Consented/Joint Pleading

RESPONSES:

on Doc. No.

on Doc. No.

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

/s/ J. Marbut

Deputy Clerk

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 8th day of

 April , 2009, that:

(a) The requested relief is DENIED.

(b) The Defendant is not eligible for a sentence reduction under 

Amendments 706, 711, and 715. 

(c) The amendments do not affect the Defendant’s sentencing guideline

range. 

/s/ Roger Vinson

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 3:99-cr-00050-RV-CJK Document 191 Filed 04/08/09 Page 1 of 1
United States

Environmental Protection

Agency

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Health and Environmental Impacts Division

Research Triangle Park, NC

Publication No. EPA-452/R-11-011

[December 2011]
#### In the Matter of Donald T. Kiley, an Attorney.

Motion for reinstatement to the Bar granted. Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Eager, McNally and MeGtivern, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C SECTION 350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Oakmont Acquisition Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof, I, Robert J. Skandalaris, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: June 14, 2007



|                                  
|----------------------------------
|/s/ Robert J. Skandalaris         
|Robert J. Skandalaris             
|Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. Case Nos.: 3:99cr46/RV 

 3:12cv261/RV/EMT

WILLIE JAMES GRIFFIN, JR.,

____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated June 13, 2012 (doc. 462). The parties have been furnished a copy of the

Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to

Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the Report and

Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.

2. Defendant’s motion to vacate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (doc. 457), is DENIED

and DISMISSED.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 13th day of July, 2012.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:99-cr-00046-RV-EMT Document 466 Filed 07/13/12 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 224 (Monday, November 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 71147]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29354]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

United States Parole Commission


Record of Vote of Meeting Closure

(Pub. L. 94-409) (5 U.S.C. Sec. 552b)

    I, Isaac Fulwood, of the United States Parole Commission, was 
present at a meeting of said Commission, which started at approximately 
10:30 a.m., on Tuesday, November 9, 2010, at the U.S. Parole 
Commission, 5550 Friendship Boulevard, 4th Floor, Chevy Chase, Maryland 
20615. The purpose of the meeting was to decide eleven petitions for 
reconsideration pursuant to 28 CFR 2.27. Four Commissioners were 
present, constituting a quorum when the vote to close the meeting was 
submitted.
    Public announcement further describing the subject matter of the 
meeting and certifications of General Counsel that this meeting may be 
closed by vote of the Commissioners present were submitted to the 
Commissioners prior to the conduct of any other business. Upon motion 
duly made, seconded, and carried, the following Commissioners voted 
that the meeting be closed: Isaac Fulwood, Cranston J. Mitchell and 
Patricia K. Cushwa, J. Patricia Wilson Smoot.
    In witness whereof, I make this official record of the vote taken 
to close this meeting and authorize this record to be made available to 
the public.

    Dated: November 10, 2010.
Isaac Fuiwood,
Chairman, U.S. Parole Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-29354 Filed 11-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D16-3684

_____________________________

MARCUS O’NEAL JENKINS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Jack Schemer, Judge.

June 27, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, MAKAR, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Paul E. Bross, Merritt Island, for Appellant.
2

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Heather Flanagan Ross,

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
June 5, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JJJJ WALKER, LLC; DYNAFAB USA, LLC; RENAISSANCE PROPERTIES 

OF TEXAS, LLC; PRIYA PROPERTIES, LLC; BD TEXAS, LLC; AND KW 

HOSPITAL ACQUISITION, LLC, Appellants

NO. 14-13-00161-CV V.

ERIC YOLLICK, Appellee

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment signed November 26, 2012 in favor 

of appellee Eric Yollick, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have 

inspected the record and find error in the judgment. We therefore order the 

judgment of the court below REVERSED and REMAND the cause for 

proceedings in accordance with the jury’s verdict and this court’s opinion.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellee Eric Yollick.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
#### Perry Hawkins, appellee, v. Edward Baker, appellant.

Gen. No. 8,832.

Opinion filed November 15, 1934.

C. B. Chapman, for appellant. Butters & Butters, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Huffman

delivered the opinion of the court.
#### Marie Ann Jellema, appellant, v. Alfred Roy Hulbert, appellee.

Gen. No. 37,394.

Opinion filed October 16, 1934.

Oscar E. Carlstrom and Paul T. Klenk, for appellant; Franklin W. Klein and Frederick W. Turner, Jr., of counsel. M. V. Minaban, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Sullivan

delivered the opinion of the court.
**EXHIBIT 31.1****Certification**I, G. Gary Yetman, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Coleman Cable, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.     Date: November 13, 2007 **/s/ G. Gary Yetman** **Chief Executive Officer and President**
§ 2500.049 Prior approvals. ( a ) *Subcontracts.* No more than 50 percent of the award may be subcontracted to other parties without prior written approval of the ADO. Any subcontract awarded to a Federal agency under an award must have prior written approval of the ADO. To request approval, a justification for the proposed subcontractual arrangements, a performance statement, and a detailed budget for the subcontract must be submitted to the ADO.
( b ) *No-cost extensions of time* — ( 1 ) *General.* Awardees may initiate a one-time no-cost extension of the expiration date of the award of up to 12 months unless one or more of the following conditions apply: the terms and conditions of the award prohibit the extension; the extension requires additional Federal funds; and the extension involves any change in the approved objectives or scope of the project. For the first no-cost extension, the awardee must notify OAO in writing with the supporting reasons and revised expiration date at least 10 days before the expiration date specified in the award.
( 2 ) *Additional requests for no-cost extensions of time before expiration date.* When more than one no-cost extension of time or an extension of more than 12 months is required, the extension(s) must be approved in writing by the PO. The awardee must submit a written request, which must be received no later than 10 days prior to the expiration date of the award, to the PO. The request must contain, at a minimum, the following information: The length of the additional time required to complete the project objectives and a justification for the extension; a summary of the progress to date; an estimate of the funds expected to remain unobligated on the scheduled expiration date; a projected timetable to complete the portion(s) of the project for which the extension is being requested; and signature of the AOR and the PD.
( 3 ) *Requests for no-cost extensions of time after expiration date.* OAO may consider and approve requests for no-cost extensions of time up to 120 days following the expiration of the award. These will be approved only for extenuating circumstances, as determined by OAO. The awardee's AOR must submit the requirements identified under paragraph (b)(2) of this section as well as an “extenuating circumstance” justification and a description of the actions taken by the awardee to minimize these requests in the future.
( 4 ) *Other requirements.* No-cost extensions of time may not be exercised merely for the purpose of using unobligated balances.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000795196
<NAME> JOHN HANCOCK REALTY INCOME FUND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,118,896
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   77,433
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,196,329
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,026,013
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          625,930
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,400,083
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,026,013
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,644,079
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,157,719
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               436,208
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,050,152
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,050,152
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,050,152
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    11.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    11.53
        

</TABLE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:Olympic National Park general management plan: draft.**** 
SuDocNumber:I29.79/3:OL 9/3/DRAFT
ItemNumber:0651-B-05(online)
CGPsystem Number:000589593
 
 
Draft GMP/EIS -Table of Contents
Draft GMP/EIS - Abstractthrough Summary
Draft GMP/EIS - Chapter 1:Introduction
Draft GMP/EIS -Chapter 2: Alternatives, Including the Preferred Alternative
Draft GMP/EIS - Chapter 3:Affected Environment
Draft GMP/EIS - Chapter 4:Environmental Consequences
Draft GMP/EIS -Chapter 5: Consultation and Coordination thru Appendixes
 **
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (a) | such                Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 fully complies with                the                requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,                as                amended; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (b) | the                information contained in such Form 10-Q for the period ended June                30, 2007                fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial                condition and results of operations of James River Group, Inc. and                its                subsidiaries as of, and for, the periods presented in such Form                10-Q. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:  | /s/                Michael T. Oakes    |   | Date:                August 6, 2007 |
|-----------|----------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------|
|      | Michael                T. Oakes        |   |                                |
|      | Chief                Financial Officer |   |                                |
|      |                                   |   |                                |

----
#### In the Matter of Myron Marshall, Appellant, v Robert P. Whalen, as Commissioner of Health of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.

(Appeal No. 2.)

Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Same memorandum as in *Matter of Marshall v State Bd. For Professional Med. Conduct*(73 AD2d 798). (Appeal from judgment of Erie Supreme Court— Public Officers Law, § 89.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Cardamone, Simons, Callahan and Moule, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                         AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                      SPORTS ENTERTAINMENT ENTERPRISES, INC.
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


     I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB of Sports Entertainment Enterprises, Inc. for the year ending
December 31, 2003:

     (1) complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of Sports
Entertainment Enterprises, Inc.


Dated:  March 26, 2004




/s/ Vaso Boreta
Vaso Boreta
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) and
Principal Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Sports Entertainment
Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Sports Entertainment Enterprises,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:99cr30-04RV

MYRON CUNNINGHAM

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Senior Judge Roger Vinson on March 10, 2010

Motion/Pleadings: Motion to Amend Presentence Report 

Filed by Defendant on 2/18/2010 Doc.# 374

RESPONSES:

 None on Doc.# 

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

 Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

 s/Jerry Marbut

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Jerry Marbut

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 24th day of 

 March , 2010, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) 

 /s/ Roger Vinson

ROGER VINSON

Senior United States District Judge
Case 3:99-cr-00042-RV Document 77 Filed 10/27/05 Page 1 of 1