alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 232 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to permit direct payment 

to pharmacies for certain compounded drugs that are prepared by the 

pharmacies for a specific beneficiary for use through an implanted infusion pump. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 14, 2013 

Mr. HARPER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on 

Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to permit 

direct payment to pharmacies for certain compounded 

drugs that are prepared by the pharmacies for a specific 

beneficiary for use through an implanted infusion pump. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•HR 232 IH

1 SECTION 1. MEDICARE DIRECT PAYMENT TO PHARMACIES 

2 FOR CERTAIN COMPOUNDED DRUGS THAT 

3 ARE PREPARED BY THE PHARMACIES FOR A 

4 SPECIFIC BENEFICIARY FOR USE THROUGH 

5 AN IMPLANTED INFUSION PUMP. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The first sentence of section 

7 1842(b)(6) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

8 1395u(b)(6)) is amended— 

9 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ before ‘‘(H)’’; and 

10 (2) by inserting before the period at the end the 

11 following: ‘‘, and (I) in the case of covered com12 pounded drugs that are prepared by a pharmacy for 

13 a specific individual, are dispensed, directly or indi14 rectly, to the individual, are necessary for the effec15 tive use of, or therapeutic benefit from, an im16 planted infusion pump (regardless of who refills the 

17 pump), and are billed directly by the pharmacy, pay18 ment shall be made to the pharmacy’’. 

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

20 subsection (a) shall apply to drugs dispensed on or after 

21 January 1, 2013. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Anthony Baggos, Sr., Appellant.

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. (See *People v Esteves,*41 NY2d 826.) (Appeal from judgment of Niagara County Court— robbery, first degree, and grand larceny, third degree.) Present — Cardamone, ondents. P., Simons, Callahan, Doerr and Moule, JJ.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant

Name                                                Jurisdiction of Incorporation         Percentage Ownership
----                                                -----------------------------         --------------------
<S>                                                 <C>                                    <C> 
Billion Luck Company Ltd.                           British Virgin Islands                100%

Hainan Zhongwei Agricultural Resources              People's Republic of China            61% (5% held by the
   Co. Ltd.                                                                               Registrant and 56% held
                                                                                          by Billion Luck)

First Goods and Materials Supply and                People's Republic of China            100% (held by HARC)
   Sales Corporation

Second Goods and Materials Supply and               People's Republic of China            100% (held by HARC)
   Sales Corporation

Hainan Zhongwei Trading Company Ltd.                People's Republic of China            99% (held by HARC)

</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.8

                        ADDENDUM TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

         This Addendum to Employment Agreement (hereinafter "AGREEMENT") is made
by and between John C. Kleinert, 48 South Franklin Turnpike, Ramsey, NJ 07446
(hereinafter "EMPLOYEE"), and J. Holder, Inc. on behalf of itself, its
subsidiaries, affiliates, predecessors, successors, assigns; and their
directors, officers, employees and agents (hereinafter collectively referred to
as "J. HOLDER"), with its principal place of business, 3100 Route 138 West, STE
A, Wall, NJ 07719.

         WHEREAS, HOLDER and EMPLOYEE have entered into an Employment Agreement,
dated as of January 1, 2004 (the "Employment Agreement") and

         WHEREAS, HOLDER and the EMPLOYEE desire to amend certain provisions of
the Employment Agreement,

         NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual and respective
covenants and agreements contained herein, HOLDER and EMPLOYEE agree as follows:

         1.       The Employee hereby confirms that no salary has been paid to
him or accrued during the period between January 1, 2004 and August 31, 2004,
and EMPLOYEE hereby waives any right to the payment of such salary. Payment of
salary at the rate stated in the Employment Agreement shall begin on September
1, 2004 and shall be paid bi-monthly less mandatory and authorized deductions.

         2.       Except as provided above, the Employment Agreement shall
remain in full force and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this ADDENDUM as of the
date first above written.

J. HOLDER, INC.                              EMPLOYEE;

By: /s/ JAMES J. MASTRIANI                   /s/ JOHN C. KLEINERT
    -------------------------------          ----------------------------------
    James J. Mastriani, Esq.                 John C. Kleinert
    CFO & CLO

Dated:   September 1, 2004                   Dated:   September 1, 2004
**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, David E. Wallace, certify that:     1) I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Superior Well Services, Inc.;     2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b. Intentionally omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 34-47986;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and     5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions); a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.         By:  /s/ David E. Wallace   David E. Wallace           Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

3M COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 4:20-cv-225-AW-MAF

1 IGNITE CAPITAL, LLC a/k/a 1 

IGNITE CAPITAL PARTNERS;

INSTITUTIONAL FINANCIAL SALES,

LLC; and AUTA LOPES, an individual, 

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER DENYING TRO AND SETTING PROCEDURES

This order follows today’s telephonic hearing on Plaintiff 3M Company’s

motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction. ECF No. 7. The 

request for a TRO is denied for the reasons stated on the record. I will defer ruling 

on the request for a preliminary injunction.

The parties must confer regarding the schedule for resolving the preliminary 

injunction motion. They must file a report by May 15 indicating whether they have 

reached agreement, and there will be a telephonic status conference on May 18 at 10 

a.m. But if the parties’ report indicates a status conference is no longer necessary—

and if I agree—I will cancel the hearing.

Counsel for plaintiff must promptly email a copy of this order to Ms. Lopes.

Case 4:20-cv-00225-AW-MAF Document 14 Filed 05/07/20 Page 1 of 2
2

SO ORDERED on May 7, 2020. 

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00225-AW-MAF Document 14 Filed 05/07/20 Page 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of Leona Herendeen et al., Appellants, v Board of Education of the Fairport Central School District, Respondent.

Judg-ment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Petitioners, three tenured, certified nurse teachers of the respondent Fairport Central School District, appeal the dismissal of their article 78 proceeding. This proceeding arose as the result of the abolition by respondent of these positions for the 1977-1978 school year. Petitioners Tripp and Herendeen accepted other positions with respondent at a substantially reduced salary. The dismissed petition sought reinstatement and back pay. Special Term incorrectly concluded that petitioners’ failure to comply with section 3813 of the Education Law was fatal to the valid maintenance of their proceeding. Where, as here, the time requirements of section 3813 are not raised before the trial court, they are waived *(Flanagan*v *Board of Educ.,*47 NY2d 613, 617; *Matter of Schlosser v Board of Educ.,*47 NY2d 811). However, we agree with Special Term’s finding that the evidence in the record before it conclusively establishes that respondent school district has properly created a separate and distinct tenure area for school nurse teachers *(Steele v Board of Educ.,*40 NY2d 456) which is of long standing and predates the employment of all three petitioners. The documentary evidence attached to their amended petition also demonstrates that petitioners, when hired, were alerted to the fact that they were entering an independent tenure area *(Waiters v Board of Educ.,*46 NY2d 885). Thus, there is no issue of fact requiring a hearing on the claimed violation of petitioners’ tenure rights under subdivision 2 of section 2510 of the Education Law. Petitioners’ other argument that the change of title was simply that and not a change of duties is similarly without merit. We recently considered the issue of whether the position of school nurse teacher and school nurse are similar and have held that they are not *(Matter of Bork v City School Dist. of City of North Tonawanda,*60 AD2d 13, 17, mot for lv to app den 44 NY2d 647; *Matter of Abdallah v Board of Educ.,*61 AD2d 1096, mot for lv to app den 45 NY2d 710). (Appeal from judgment of Monroe Supreme Court—art 78.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Callahan and Moule, JJ.
MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

97- 1226.

#### State ex rel. McRae v. Indus. Comm.

Franklin App. No. 96APD07-881. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

ELBERT PARR TUTTLE COURT OF APPEALS BUILDING

56 Forsyth Street, N.W.

Atlanta, Georgia 30303

David J. Smith

Clerk of Court 

March 07, 2023

For rules and forms visit

www.ca11.uscourts.gov

Clerk - Northern District of Florida

U.S. District Court 

30 W GOVERNMENT ST

PANAMA CITY, FL 32601

Appeal Number: 22-11772-DD

Case Style: USA v. Vincent Walker

District Court Docket No: 5:20-cr-00012-MW-MJF-1

A copy of this letter, and the judgment form if noted above, but not a copy of the court's 

decision, is also being forwarded to counsel and pro se parties. A copy of the court's decision 

was previously forwarded to counsel and pro se parties on the date it was issued.

The enclosed copy of the judgment is hereby issued as mandate of the court. The court's opinion 

was previously provided on the date of issuance.

Clerk's Office Phone Numbers

General Information 404-335-6100

New / Before Briefing Cases 404-335-6135

Cases in Briefing / After Opinion 404-335-6130

Cases Set for Oral Argument 404-335-6141

Capital Cases 404-335-6200

Attorney Admissions 404-335-6122

CM/ECF Help Desk 404-335-6125

Enclosure(s) 

MDT-1 Letter Issuing Mandate

USCA11 Case: 22-11772 Document: 32-1 Date Filed: 03/07/2023 Page: 1 of 1

Case 5:20-cr-00012-MW-MJF Document 102 Filed 03/07/23 Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

VINCENT WALKER, 

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida

D.C. Docket No. 5:20-cr-00012-MW-MJF-1

____________________

JUDGMENT

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit 

____________________

No. 22-11772

____________________

ISSUED AS MANDATE: 03/07/2023

USCA11 Case: 22-11772 Document: 32-2 Date Filed: 03/07/2023 Page: 1 of 2

Case 5:20-cr-00012-MW-MJF Document 102 Filed 03/07/23 Page 2 of 3
2 22-11772

It is hereby ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the opinion issued on this date in this appeal is entered as the judgment of this 

Court.

Entered: February 6, 2023

For the Court: DAVID J. SMITH, Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS MANDATE: 03/07/2023

USCA11 Case: 22-11772 Document: 32-2 Date Filed: 03/07/2023 Page: 2 of 2

Case 5:20-cr-00012-MW-MJF Document 102 Filed 03/07/23 Page 3 of 3
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

SHASHID SHEMAYNE STROMAN,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 3:20cv2696-LC-HTC

MARK S. INCH,

Respondent.

/

ORD ER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report

and Recommendation dated March 26, 2020 (ECF No. 6), to which Petitioner has

objected (ECF Doc 13). The parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and

Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections

pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo

determination of the timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation and the objections

thereto, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be

adopted.

Case 3:20-cv-02696-LC-HTC Document 14 Filed 07/17/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF Doc. 6) is

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The Petition (ECF Doc. 1) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as

untimely.

3. The Clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 17th day of July, 2020.

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No. 3:20cv2696-LC-HTC

Case 3:20-cv-02696-LC-HTC Document 14 Filed 07/17/20 Page 2 of 2
#### § 29.2629 Rule 13.

Length shall be stated in connection with each grade of the A, B, and C groups, except strip grades, and may be stated in connection with the grades of other groups. The standard tobacco sizes shall be used.

[37 FR 13626, July 12, 1972, as amended at 49 FR 16757, Apr. 20, 1984; 51 FR 40406, Nov. 7, 1986]
#### § 29.6020 Group.

A type division consisting of one or more grades based on the general quality of tobacco. Groups in these types are: Binder (B), Stripper (C), Straight Stripped (X), Farm Filler (Y), Nondescript (N), and Scrap (S).
#### § 29.1029 Leaf scrap.

A byproduct of stemmed and unstemmed tobacco.

[42 FR 21092, Apr. 25, 1977. Redesignated at 49 FR 16755, Apr. 20, 1984, and 51 FR 25027, July 10, 1986]
Exhibit 10.36




Exhibit
10.36







[FM
Services Company Letterhead]




January
3, 2005










B. M.
Rankin, Jr.

300
Crescent Court, Suite 875

Dallas,
Texas 75201




Dear Mr.
Rankin:




The
purpose of this letter is to confirm the automatic renewal of your Consulting
Agreement dated January 1, 1991, as amended (the “Agreement”).




Your
contract will automatically renew for an additional one-year period beginning
January 1, 2005, and ending December 31, 2005. All other terms and conditions of
the Agreement shall remain the same.




Please
confirm that the foregoing correctly sets forth your understanding with respect
to this matter by signing both originals of this letter and returning one to
me.







Very
truly yours,




/s/
Richard C. Adkerson 




Richard
C. Adkerson

Chairman
of the Board

President

FM
Services Company










AGREED
TO AND ACCEPTED







BY:
  /s/ B.
M. Rankin, Jr.  1/19/05 

                          
B. M. Rankin, Jr.  Date
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 2407** 

CERES MARINE TERMINALS, INC. , Petitioner ,

v.
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ; ANTHONY K. WALLACE; TARTAN TERMINALS, INCORPORATED; AMERICAN LONGSHORE MUTUAL ASSOCIATION, LTD. , Respondents

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board

. ( 14

- 0124; 14

- 0124A )

Submitted : July 31, 2015 Decided: August 13, 2015

Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Lawrence P. Postol , SEYFARTH SHAW, L.L.P., Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Heather H. Kraus, SEMMES, BOWEN, and SEMMES, Baltimore, Maryland ; Patrick Marlin Wysong , BER MAN, SOBIN, GROSS, FELDMAN & DARBY, LLP , Lutherville, Maryland; Kathleen Kim , Mark A. Reinhalter , UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D

. C

. , for Respondents

.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Ceres Mar ine Terminals, Inc., seeks review of the Benefits
Review Board ’ s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge ’ s (“ALJ”) order finding that Ceres is the employer responsible for payment of temporary total disability benefits to Anthony K. Wallace, pursuant to 33 U.S.C. §§ 901

- 950 (2012)

. Our review of the record discloses that the ALJ and the Board applied the proper legal standard, and the ALJ’s decision is based upon substantial evidence

. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review

. W e dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
#### In re MEAGHER.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 8, 1906.)

In the matter of William J. Meagher.

No opinion. Application denied. Settle order on notice.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of CEO Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation for the quarter ended March 31,2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,Roger W. Stone, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of KapStone Paper andPackaging Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation.

 
| Dated:  May 5, 2008 |   |                                 |
|--------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------|
|                     |   |                                 |
|                     | By:    | /s/ Roger W. Stone                   |
|                     |   | Roger W. Stone                       |
|                     |   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 32.1

Section 1350 Certification

                  The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the Form 10-K of RFMC Willowbridge Fund, L.P. pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350).

                 The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of RFMC Willowbridge Fund, L.P.

March 31, 2009

/s/ Robert L. Lerner                                   Robert L. Lerner            President, Principal Executive Officer and               Principal Financial Officer            Ruvane Fund Management Corporation,            the general partner of             RFMC Willowbridge Fund, L.P.
OMB Control No. 2060-0347

The public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to range up to 40 minutes per response. Send 

comments on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested 

methods for minimizing respondent burden, including through the use of automated collection techniques to the Director, 

Collection Strategies Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2822T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, 

D.C. 20460. Include the OMB control number in any correspondence. Do not send the completed form to this address.

EPA Form 5900-89

STATEMENT OF ENERGY PERFORMANCE

Add Facility Name Here

For 12 month period ending: Month/Day/Year

Facility Address Owner's Address Corporate Energy Manager Contact

Facility Name Owner's Name Contact Name

Street Address Street Address Email Address

Address 2 Address 2 Phone Number

City, State City, State

60565 ZIP

Cement Plant EPI Result

Energy Performance 

Score: 99

Professional Verification

Professional Engineer Name

Address

Address 2

City, State ZIP

Phone Number:

Licensed Number:

Licensing State:

EPI Verification

NOTE:

For US EPA Use Only:

3. An energy performance score of 75 is the minimum required rating to be considered eligible for the 

ENERGY STAR.

Professional Engineer Stamp

Based on the conditions observed at the time of 

my visit to this facility, I certify that the information 

used in this tool to generate the energy 

performance score represented on this statement 

is accurate.

1. Applications for recognition of plant energy performance to the US EPA must be made within 4 months of 

Period Ending date. Award of the ENERGY STAR is not final until approved by the US EPA.

2. All EPI scores and supporting data must first be verified by the US EPA or a US EPA-designated EPI 

reviewer if supporting data is considered to be confidential business information (CBI) before submitting 

applications for the ENERGY STAR.

EPI attached for EPA review.

EPI contains confidential business 

information and has been sent to the 

designated reviewer.