# REfLACE

s, Drr)

3&Z

DAN MORALES ATTORNEY GENERAL 

## @fficeoftlJeBttornep @eneral i%tate of IICexae:

February 23, 1996

Mr.Mike Moses Commissioner ofEducation Texas Education Agency 1701North Congress Avenue Austin, Texas 78701-1494 Opinion No. DM-378

Re: Construction of the term “school bus” for purposes of Senate Bill 1, Act of May 27,, 1995, 74th Leg., R.S., ch. 260, 1995 Tex. Sess. Law Serv. 2207 and related questions (RQ-846)

Dear Commissioner Moses:

You have asked this office to’examine certain questions concerning standards for transporting school children in the light of Senate Bill 1, and in particular in light of section 34.003 of the Education Code enacted therein.’ See Act ofMay 27, 1995, 74th Leg., RS., ch. 260, $ 1, 1995 Tex. Sess. Law Serv. 2207, 2351. You are especially interested in whether, for the purposes of section 34.003, a motor vehicle being used to transport fewer than ten students may be considered a “passenger car” even if such a vehicle has a seating capacity greater than that of a “passenger ca? as defined by section 541.201 ofthe Transportation Code. You further wish to know whether avehicle owned by aprivate person, such as ateacher or parent, is subject to the same safety requirements and driver qualification requirements as a school bus when such avehicle isbeing used to transport fewer than ten students to andfrom school or school activities.

The general definition ofa school bus is now provided by section 541.201(15) of the Transportation @de, which provides:

“School.~bus” means a motor vehicle, other than a bus used in an urban area by acommon carrier to transport schoolchildren, that: (A) isbeing used to transport children to or from a school
or school-related activity; and (B) complies with the color and identification requirements provided inthe most recent edition of standards produced and sponsored by the National Education Association’s National Commission on SafetyEducation.

‘On August 31, 1995, you withdrew your predecessor’s prior opinion requeston related questions,

which was styled bythis office RQ-781.Mr. Mike Moses - Page 2 (DM-378)

Section 34.003 ofthe Education Code, enacted as part of Senate Bill 1,provides that “school buses” will be used to transport students on bus routes with ten or more students, while “passenger cars” may be used on routes with fewer than ten students. Educ. Code 534.003(a). It further provides that, with respect to transporting students in connection with extracurricular activities, ten or more students mayonly be transported in school buses, buses chartered from motor bus companies, or district-owned buses which meet the safety standards for vehicles owned by motor bus companies, while fewer than ten students may betransported inpassenger cars. Id. When students are transported in passenger cars, the section provides that the operator must ensure that the number of passengers does not exceed the vehicle’s design capacity and that ah passengers are wearing safety belts. Id. 534.003(c).
Section 34.003 was offered as a tloor amendment to Senate Bill 1 on March 27, 1995,by Senator Bivins, who said inintroducing it, “This amendment makes it clear that school districts can charter buses and that they also may use passenger vehicles to transport ten or fewer students on regular school bus routes, if those passenger. [vehicles] are equipped with seat belts and are capable of carrying the proper number ofpeople-number ofchildren in that vehicle.” Debate on S.B. I on the Floor of the Senate, 74th Leg., R.S. (Mar. 27, 1995) (transcript available from Senate StaffServices).

As you know, this office has previously held that the.portion of the statutory definition of“school busy’inthe predecessor to section 541.201(15) ofthe Transportation Code was unconstitutional to the extent it referred to standards set by the National Education Association.2 That decision was based on our interpretation of Dudding v. Automatic Gus Co., 193 S.W.2d 517 (Tex. 1946). This office has consistently read Dudding to stand for the proposition that a statute that prospectively adopts the mture rules of an unofficial agency thereby delegates legislative authority in a manner that violates article IIJ,+ction 1 of the Texas Constitution. Most recently, in Attorney General Opinion DM-159, this office concluded that aprovision ofthe Health and Safety Code that required-~outdoorshooting ranges to adhere to standards “at least as stringent as the standards printed inthe National Rifle Association range manual” without reference to aparticular edition ofthe manual violated article III, section 1. Attorney General Opinion DM-159 (1992) at 1. The definition here is not legally distinguishable from the standard at issue in Attorney General Opinion DM-159, and therefore also improperly delegates legislative authority. Id.
This decision would excise from the statutory definition what is now section 541.201(15)(B), leaving as the definition section 541,201(15)(A). As a general matter, weremain persuaded that that isaproper interpretation, and that for ah purposes savethe

2Former Attorney General

Opinion DM-362 (1995) waswithdrawn September

8, 1995.

p. 2056Mr.Mike Moses - Page 3 (DM-378)

concerns of section 34.003 of the Education Code, the definition of “school bus” is that contained in section 541,201(15)(A) of the Transportation Code. However, oweare persuaded by the remarks of its sponsor in introducing section 34.003 of the Education Code that the intent of that legislation was to exempt passenger cars from the safety standards and driver qualifications goveming school buses to the limited extent that such vehicles were being used to transport fewer than ten students to or from school or extracurricular activities, and to permit the use of buses (whether chartered from motor buscompanies or owned by school districts) which meet the standards for motor buses set down in sections 5.201 through 5.249 of title 16 of the Texas Administrative Code to transport children to and from extracurricular activities3 We further conclude that passenger cars owned by private persons such as parents or teachers are not subject to school bus safety standards, nor do webelieve that such persons are “school bus drivers” subjectto 1icensure.4

You tinther ask “whether amotor vehicle with a seating capacity greater than that of a passenger car as defined by Section 541.201, Transportation Code, may be used under Section 34.003, Education Code, to transport lessthan ten students.” We think the question as framed may suggest some confusion as to the state of the law. Section 541.201(15)(A), which defines “school bus,” says that a vehicle “being used to transport children to or from a school or school-related activity” is a school bus. Tramp. Code §541.201. That isto say, any suchvehicle must comply with the requirements of sections 547.607 and 547.701(a) of the Transportation Code, which respectively require school busesto be equipped with afire extinguisher and aconvex mirror and signal lamps, unless itisexempted Tom suchrequirements by section 34.003 ofthe Education Code. Further, any person driving such a vehicle, unless the vehicle is exempt, must have a school bus

‘The standards for motor buses were originally promulgated by the Transportation Division of the Texas Railroad Commission pursuant to article 911a, V.T.C.S. Article 911a was repealed by Act of May 24, 1995, 74th Leg., P.S., ch. 705, $ 31(a)(3), 1995 Tex. Sess. Law Serv. 3719, 3740. However, chapter 705, section.32@) provides that “[a] role adopted by the Railroad Commission ofTexas under a lawre&xaledby S&i&31 ofthis Actbefore the effective date ofthis Ad that is not inconsistent with this Ad remains in effect as a role of the Texas Department of Transportation or the Department of public Safety until supersede%! by a rule adopted by the appropriate department” Id. $32(b), at 3740. Section 3 of chapter 705 adds ‘utile 66756 V.T.C.S., which provides that the public safety director has rolemakingauthority

over“thesafeoperationofeommerciat motorvehicles” Id. 53,at3729. Accordingly, unless and until superseded by roles adopted by the Department ofPublic Safety sections 5.201 through 5.249 oftitle 16ofthe Texas Administrative Code remain in full force and effect,

‘Yom query assumes that a school district isauthorized to hanspmt students in privately owned vehicles operated by parents orteachers. We find nothing in the Education Code that permits or prohibits
a school district from doing so,but webelieve such authority may be implied. We caution that nothing in thisopinion,orinsection34.003 ofthe Education Code, speaks to the standard ofcare to be exercised by drivers of privately owned vehicles. Hence, nothing suggests that such drivers are held to any lower standard ofcare than ordinary drivers ofpassenger vehicles. Further, we do not consider whether courts would consider such drivers agents of an independent school district for pmposcs of liability. On such issues, school boards should consult their legal counsel.

p. 2057Mr.Mike Moses - Page 4 (DM-378)

driver’s license, the requirements for which--that the holder be at least eighteen years of age, be enrolled in or have completed~a driver training course in school bus safety, have undergone an annual physical examination and apre-employment driver’s license check by the Department ofPublic Safety--are mandated by section 521.022 ofthe Transportation Code. A vehicle of the sort you describe may be used to transport school children. However, unless it is a passenger car or a bus transporting students to -or from extracurricular activities which meets the motor bus standards of sections 5.201 through 5.249 oftitle 16ofthe Texas Administrative Code and therefore subject to the exceptions of section 34.003 of the Education Code, such a vehicle must be considered a “school bus”; it must therefore have the requisite mirror, fire extinguisher, and signal lamp, and mustbedriven by alicensed school busdriver.
We do not intend to suggest that the only vehicles which maybeused to transport school children to school or extra-curricular activities are “school buses” as popularly understood--that is,the familiar bigyellow school buses. However, ifavehicle being used for this purpose is not a “passenger car” or “motor bus” within the terms of the exceptions, we reiterate that it must meet the safety standards and operator licensing requirements outlined above.
The school bus standards we have discussed are statutory. We note in addition that certain agencies also have regulatory authority in this area. Thus, section 34.002(a) ofthe Education Code provides that “[tlhe General Services Commission, with the advice of the Department of Public Safety, shall establish safety standards for school motor vehicles.” Further, the Department of Public Safety pursuant to Transportation Code section 547.101 has power to adopt standards for vehicle equipment to protect the public and enforce United States safety standards, and pursuant to section 547.102 has power to adopt supplementary standards for school buslighting andwarning device equipment.

“‘Passengercar” is defined by section 541.201(12) of the Transportation Code as

“a motor vehicle,. other than a motorcycle, used to transport persons and designed to accommodate 10ot%ewer passengers.” Tramp. Code 5541.201(12). The definition, we note, stresses the number of passengers the vehicle is designed to carry, rather than the number it may act@y carry. Accordingly, we read Education Code section 34.003’s

“passenger car” exception aslimited to vehicles designed to carry ten or fewer passengers, which may however under the Education Code be used only to transport fewer than ten passengers. This reading includes such vehicles as Suburbarts, for example, which transport nine passengers, within the exception, Fit&n passenger vans, on the other hand, are not excepted by the “passenger cat” language of section 34.003. While, as we have said, such vehicles may be used to transport students to school, they must for that purpose meet the safety standards and licensure requirements for school buses. Ifthey are transporting ten or more students to or from extracurricular activities, they must meet the motor bus standards of sections 5.201 through 5.249 of title 16 of the Texas Administrative Code.

p. 2058Mr. Mike Moses - Page 8 (DM-378)

SUMMARY
Under section 34.003 of the Education Code, school districts may permit the transportation offewerthan ten students to and from school and extracurricular activities in passenger vehicles which are not subject to the same safety standards and driver qualifications as

“schools buses” as defined by section 541,201(15)(A) of the Transportation Code, solong assuchpassenger vehicles donot carry more passengers than their design capacity permits and the operator ensures that all passengers arewearing safety belts. This “passenger car” exception does not apply to vehicles with a larger design capacity than that of “passenger cars” as defined by section 541.201(12) of the Transportation Code. In addition, schools may transport ten or more students to and from extracurricular activities in school buses or buses either chartered from motor bus companies
or owned by the school district which meet the motor bus standards of sections 5.201 through 5.249 of title 16 of the Texas Administrative Code. Operators ofprivate passenger vehicles such
asparents or teachers are not subject to school bus safety standards
or licensure requirements when transporting fewer than ten students to or from school or extracurricular activities in such a passenger vehicle.

JORGE VEGA First Assistant Att&ey General

SARAH J. SHIRLEY Chair, Opinion Committee Prepared byJames E.Tourtelott Assistant Attorney General DAN MORALES Attorney Genera1ofTexas

p. 2059