alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT32

 

CERTIFICATIONSPURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18U.S.C. SECTION 1350) 

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of Cala Corporation. on Form 10-Kfor the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission (the "Report") Joseph Cala, ChiefExecutive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, doeshereby certify, pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), that to his knowledge:

 

1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operationof the Company.

 

Date: March 31, 2011                     By: /s/ Joseph Cala                             

JosephCala 

PrincipalExecutive Officer and Principal Financial Officer     

Thiscertification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extentrequired by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by theCompany for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended.
#### § 29.2392 Rule 1.

Each grade shall be treated as a subdivision of a particular type. When the grade is stated in an inspection certificate, the type also shall be stated.
§ 27.94 Spot markets for contract settlement purposes. The following are designated as spot markets for the purpose of determining as provided in paragraph 15b(f)(3) of the act, the differences above or below the contract price which the receiver shall pay for grades tendered or deliverable in settlement of a basis grade contract: ( a ) For cotton delivered in settlement of any No. 2 contract on the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE); Southeastern, North and South Delta, East Texas and South Texas, West Texas, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Desert Southwest.
( b ) [Reserved]
[53 FR 29327, Aug. 4, 1988, as amended at 88 FR 49994, Aug. 1, 2023]
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 25, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-51136

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CRISPIN BUENROSTRO-IBARRA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. DR-02-CR-213-1-WWJ

--------------------

Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 Crispin Buenrostro-Ibarra appeals the sentence imposed

following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United

States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Buenrostro contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior

conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element

of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have

been alleged in his indictment. Buenrostro maintains that he
No. 02-51136

-2-

pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry

under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds

the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed

for that offense.

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Buenrostro acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
Case 3:20-cv-04698-TKW-HTC   Document 10-1   Filed 04/09/20   Page 1 of 1

    - Text1: 1
U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration

Advisory 

Circular

Subject: Change 7 to MEASUREMENT, 

CONSTRUCTION, AND MAINTENANCE OF SKIDRESISTANT AIRPORT PAVEMENT SURFACES 

Date: 12/05/2005

Initiated by: AAS-100 

AC No: 150/5320-12C

Change: 7 

1. PURPOSE. This change updates information regarding FAA qualified Continuous Friction 

Measuring Equipment.

2. PRINCIPAL CHANGES. The following editorial changes have been made:

 a. Appendix 4. Changes have been made to reflect updated information for manufacturers. 

PAGE CONTROL CHART 

Remove Pages Dated Insert Pages Dated 

Appendix 4 

pg. 1 (and 2) 

05/25/05 Appendix 4 

pg. 1 (and 2) 

12/05/05 

DAVID L. BENNETT 

Director of Airport Safety 

 and Standards 
12/05/05 AC 150/5320-12C Change 7 

Appendix 4 

APPENDIX 4. FAA APPROVED CFME 

AIRPORT SURFACE FRICTION TESTER INDUSTRIES AB AIRPORT SURFACE FRICTION TESTER 

Metallgatan 7 +46 0 411 651 00 

271 39 Ystad, Sweden FAX +46 0 411 190 12 

SWEDEN email: sales@asft.se 

AIRPORT TECHNOLOGY USA SAFEGATE FRICTION TESTER 

NO LONGER AVAILABLE 

DOUGLAS EQUIPMENT LTD MU METER 

Douglas House, Village Road +44 1242 531219 

Arle, Cheltenham FAX +44 1242 571667 

Gloucestershire email: spd@douglas-equipment.com

GL51 0AB UK

DYNATEST CONSULTING, INC., RUNWAY FRICTION TESTER (6810, 6850 and 6875) 

(FORMERLY K.J. LAW ENGINEERS, INC.) +(904) 964-3777

13952 US Highway 301 South FAX +(904) 964-3749 

Starke, FL 32091 

FINDLAY, IRVINE, LTD. GRIPTESTER FRICTION 

TESTER

42-44 Bog Road, Penicuik +44 1968 672111 

Midlothian EH 26 9 BU FAX +44 1968 671237 

SCOTLAND 

www.findlayirvine.com

INTERTECH ENGINEERING TATRA FRICTION TESTER

 NO LONGER AVAILABLE 

NEUBERT AERO CORP. NAC DYNAMIC FRICTION

TESTER 

4105 West De Leon Street +(727) 538-8744 

Tampa, FL 33609 FAX +(727) 538-8765 

 email: info@airportnac.com

 www.airportnac.com 

NORSEMETER RUNAR RUNWAY ANALYSER AND RECORDER 

P. O. Box 125 +47 23 20 1270 

Bogstadvien FAX +47 23 20 1271 

0323 0310 

NORWAY 

PATRIA VAMMAS AEC BV-11 

SKIDDOMETER 

P.O. Box 18 Vammaksentie +358 20 4694041 

FIN-38201 Vammala FAX +358 20 

4694250 

FINLAND www.patria.fi 

SCANDINAVIAN AIRPORT AND ROAD SYSTEMS AB SARSYS FRICTION TESTER 

(SFT) 

Box 31, Sjoviksvagen 4 SARSYS TRAILER FRICTION TESTER (STFT) 

23121 Trelleborg +46 410 46 110 

SWEDEN FAX +46 410 46 111 

US/Canada Tradewind Scientific Ltd. www.tradewindscientific.com 

1 (and 2)
§ 220.6 Use of funds. ( a ) Federal funds made available under the School Breakfast Program shall be used by State agencies, or FNSROs where applicable, to reimburse or make advance payments to School Food Authorities in connection with breakfasts served in accordance with the provisions of this part. However, with the approval of FNS, any State agency, or FNSRO where applicable, may reserve for use in carrying out special developmental projects an amount up to 1 per centum of the funds earned in any fiscal year under the School Breakfast Program. Advance payments to School Food Authorities may be made at such times and in such amounts as are necessary to meet current obligations.
( b ) Whoever embezzles, willfully misapplies, steals, or obtains by fraud any funds, assets, or property provided under this part, whether received directly or indirectly from the Department, shall— ( 1 ) If such funds, assets, or property are of a value of $100 or more, be fined not more than $25,000 or imprisoned not more than 5 years or both; or
( 2 ) If such funds, assets, or property are of a value of less than $100, be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisoned not more than one year or both.
( c ) Whoever receives, conceals, or retains to his use or gain funds, assets, or property provided under this part, whether received directly or indirectly from the Department, knowing such funds, assets, or property have been embezzled, willfully misapplied, stolen, or obtained by fraud, shall be subject to the same penalties provided in paragraph (b) of this section.
(Sec. 10(a), Pub. L. 95-627, 92 Stat. 3623 (42 U.S.C. 1760); sec. 10(d)(3), Pub. L. 95-627, 92 Stat. 3624 (42 U.S.C. 1757); sec. 14, Pub. L. 95-627, 92 Stat. 3625-3626)
[40 FR 30923, July 24, 1975, as amended by Amdt. 25, 41 FR 34759, Aug. 17, 1976; Amdt. 28, 44 FR 37899, June 29, 1979; 64 FR 50742, Sept. 20, 1999]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997<F1>
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           5,833
<SECURITIES>                                     3,100
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,255
<ALLOWANCES>                                       265
<INVENTORY>                                      5,139
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,804
<PP&E>                                          10,278
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,982
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,214
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,395
<BONDS>                                          1,229
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           174
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,306
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,214
<SALES>                                         30,075
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,075
<CGS>                                           13,481
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,481
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,216
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,702
<INCOME-TAX>                                       865
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,837
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,837
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .52
<FN>
<F1>THE RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO REFLECT ANY 
CHANGES DUE TO FAS 128.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### §§ 2003.7-2003.9 [Reserved]
§ 215.13 Management evaluations and audits. ( a ) Unless otherwise exempt, audits at the State and school food authority/child care institution levels shall be conducted in accordance with 2 CFR part 200, subpart F, and Appendix XI, Compliance Supplement and USDA's implementing regulations 2 CFR part 400 and part 415.
( b ) Each State agency shall provide FNS with full opportunity to conduct management evaluations (including visits to schools and child-care institutions) of any operations of the State agency under the Program and shall provide OIG with full opportunity to conduct audits (including visits to schools and child-care institutions) of all operations of the State agency under the Program. Each State agency shall make available its records, including records of the receipt and expenditure of funds under the Program, upon a reasonable request by FNS or OIG. OIG shall also have the right to make audits of the records and operations of any school or child-care institution.
( c ) In conducting management evaluations, reviews or audits for any fiscal year, the State agency, FNS, or OIG may disregard any overpayment if the total overpayment does not exceed $600 or, in the case of State agency claims in State administered Programs, it does not exceed the amount established under State law, regulations or procedure as a minimum amount for which claim will be made for State losses but not to exceed $600. However, no overpayment is to be disregarded where there is substantial evidence of violations of criminal law or civil fraud statutes.
(Secs. 805 and 819, Pub. L. 97-35, 95 Stat. 521-535 (42 U.S.C. 1773); sec. 812, Pub. L. 97-35, 95 Stat. 521-535 (42 U.S.C. 1759a))
[Amdt. 14, 41 FR 31175, July 27, 1976, as amended at 43 FR 58925, Dec. 22, 1978; Amdt. 23, 47 FR 14135, Apr. 2, 1982; Amdt. 25, 47 FR 18564, Apr. 30, 1982; Amdt. 36, 54 FR 2990, Jan. 23, 1989; 57 FR 38586, Aug. 26, 1992; 59 FR 1894, Jan. 13, 1994; 64 FR 50742, Sept. 20, 1999; 71 FR 39516, July 13, 2006; 81 FR 66490, Sept. 28, 2016]
#### § 28.177 Request for classification and comparison of cotton.

The applicant shall make a separate request, using an application supplied by the Program, for each lot or mark of cotton that the applicant desires classified or compared separately. All requests for classification or comparison shall be filed with the Quality Assurance Division or the Classing Office designated by the Deputy Administrator of the Cotton and Tobacco Program.

[81 FR 7030, Feb. 10, 2016]
#### § 29.1181 Summary of standard grades.

| B1L | B1F | B1FR | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| B2L | B2F | B2FR | | |
| B3L | B3F | B3FR | | B3K |
| B4L | B4F | B4FR | | B4K |
| B5L | B5F | B5FR | B5R | B5K |
| B6L | B6F | B6FR | | B6K |

23 Grades of Leaf

| | H3F | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | H4F | H4FR | H4K |
| | H5F | H5FR | H5K |
| | H6F | H6FR | H6K |

10 Grades of Smoking Leaf

| C1L | C1F |
| --- | --- |
| C2L | C2F |
| C3L | C3F |
| C4L | C4F |
| C5L | C5F |

10 Grades of Cutters

| X1L | X1F |
| --- | --- |
| X2L | X2F |
| X3L | X3F |
| X4L | X4F |
| X5L | X5F |

10 Grades of Lugs

| P2L | P2F |
| --- | --- |
| P3L | P3F |
| P4L | P4F |
| P5L | P5F |

8 Grades of Primings

| B3V | | X3V |
| --- | --- | --- |
| B4V | C4V | X4V |
| B5V | | |

6 Grades of Greenish

| B3KL | B3KF | B3KD | | | | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| B4KL | B4KF | B4KD | B4KV | C4KL | C4KF | X4KL | X4KF | X4KV |
| B5KL | B5KF | B5KD | B5KV | | | | | |
| B6KL | B6KF | B6KD | B6KV | | | | | |

20 Grades of Variegated

| M4F | M4KR | M4KM | M4GK |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| M5F | | M5KM | M5GK |

7 Mixed Grades

| B4G | | B4GK | | C4G | C4GK | X4G | X4GK | P4G |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| B5G | B5GR | B5GK | B5GG | | | X5G | | P5G |
| B6G | | B6GK | | | | | | |

15 Grades of Green

| B3KM | | X3KM |
| --- | --- | --- |
| B4KM | C4KM | X4KM |
| B5KM | | |
| B6KM | | |

7 Grades of Variegated Mixed

| B3KR | | X3KR |
| --- | --- | --- |
| B4KR | C4KR | X4KR |
| B5KR | | |

6 Grades of Variegated Red or Scorched

| | B3KK |
| --- | --- |
| | B4KK |
| | B5KK |
| | B6KK |
| | C4KK |

5 Grades of Excessively Scorched

| B3S | | X3S |
| --- | --- | --- |
| B4S | C4S | X4S |
| B5S | | |

6 Grades of Slick

| X3LL | C4LL |
| --- | --- |
| X4LL | C5LL |

4 Grades of Whitish-Lemon

| C5LP | C5FP |
| --- | --- |

2 Grades of Cutters (Primings Side)

| N1L | N1KV | N1GG |
| --- | --- | --- |
| N1XL | N1GL | N1PO |
| N1K | N1GF | N1XO |
| N1R | N1GR | N1BO |
| | | N2 |

13 Grades of Nondescript

| | S | |
| --- | --- | --- |

1 Grade of Scrap

Special factors “U” (unsound), “W” (doubtful-keeping order), “S” (strip), and “M” (mixed) may be applied to all grades. The special factors “dirt” or “sand” may be applied to any grade in the Primings group, including first quality Nondescript from the Primings group. Tobacco not covered by the standard grades is designated “No-G,” “No-G-F,” or “No-G-Nested.”

[48 FR 29671, June 28, 1983, as amended at 49 FR 16756, Apr. 20, 1984; 51 FR 25028, July 10, 1986; 52 FR 28534, July 31, 1987; 60 FR 36028, July 13, 1995]
§ 29.1082 Waste. The portion or portions of the web of tobacco leaves which have been lost or rendered less serviceable for use in tobacco products, including: ( a ) Portions which have decomposed or largely decomposed by field diseases and field-firing, pole-burning, bulk-burning;
( b ) portions which are dead, lifeless, and do not have sufficient strength or stability to hold together in the normal manufacturing process due to excessive injury of any kind.
[42 FR 21092, Apr. 25, 1977. Redesignated at 47 FR 51721, Nov. 17, 1982, 49 FR 16756, Apr. 20, 1984, and 51 FR 25027, July 10, 1986]
#### Felisa Reagan, Petitioner, v Brooklyn Union Gas Company, et al., Respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated March 9, 1979, which affirmed an order of the State Division of Human Rights, dated July 6, 1978, dismissing petitioner’s complaint upon a finding that there was no probable cause to believe that the Brooklyn Union Gas Company had engaged in an unlawful or discriminating practice. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed, without costs or disbursements. On the record considered as a whole, there exists sufficient evidence to support the State Division of Human Rights finding that there was no probable cause to believe that the Brooklyn Union Gas Company had engaged in the unlawful discriminatory practice complained of. Gibbons, J. P., Gulotta, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1876 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to extend the reduced interest 

rate for Federal Direct Stafford Loans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2013 

Ms. SINEMA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to extend 

the reduced interest rate for Federal Direct Stafford Loans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stability to Ensure 

5 the American Dream for Youth Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INTEREST RATE EXTENSION. 

7 Subparagraph (D) of section 455(b)(7) of the Higher 

8 Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087e(b)(7)) is amend9 ed— 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1876 IH

1 (1) in the matter preceding clause (i), by strik2 ing ‘‘2013’’ and inserting ‘‘2017’’; and 

3 (2) in clause (v), by striking ‘‘2013’’ and insert4 ing ‘‘2017’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
|  |  |  |  |  |
|--|--|--|--|--|
|  |  |  |  |

  Ohio

> - Arkon
- Cincinnati
- Columbus
- Euclid
- Hamilton
- Lima
- Toledo
- Toledo-Lagrange
- Youngstown

----
§ 249.24 Data safeguarding procedures. FNS and SFMNP State agencies will take reasonable steps to keep applicant and participant information/records private to the extent provided by law. Such steps include a requirement for each State agency to restrict the use or disclosure of information obtained from SFMNP applicants and participants to: ( a ) Persons directly connected with the administration or enforcement of the SFMNP, including persons investigating or prosecuting violations in the SFMNP under Federal, State or local authority;
( b ) Representatives of public organizations designated by the chief State agency officer (or, in the case of Indian Tribal governments acting as SFMNP State agencies, the governing authority) that administer food, nutrition, or other assistance programs that serve persons categorically eligible for the SFMNP. The State agency must execute a written agreement with each such designated organization: ( 1 ) Specifying that the receiving organization may employ SFMNP information only for the purpose of establishing the eligibility of SFMNP applicants and participants for food, nutrition, or other assistance programs that it administers and conducts outreach to SFMNP applicants and participants for such programs; and
( 2 ) Containing the receiving organization's assurance that it will not, in turn, disclose the information to a third party.
( c ) The Comptroller General of the United States for audit and examination authorized by law.
#### § 29.2391 Rules.

The application of these official standard grades shall be in accordance with the following rules.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements of CEM Corporation on Form S-8 (File Numbers 33-11952, 33-25739,
33-53694, 33-75366, 33-75368, 33-80136 and 33-87676) of our report dated July
21, 1999, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedule of CEM Corporation as of June 30, 1999 and 1998, and for the
years ended June 30, 1999, 1998 and 1997, which report is included in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Charlotte, North Carolina
September 23, 1999
---

EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of DigitalPost Interactive, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven
Dong, Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act  of
2001, that:





The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
May 15, 2008





/s/
Steven Dong


---------------------


Steven
Dong


Chief
Accounting Officer








---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                        574,700
<SECURITIES>                               18,628,700
<RECEIVABLES>                                  90,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           19,294,100
<PP&E>                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             19,308,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      15,168,800
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                  4,139,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               19,308,200
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            3,442,000
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 652,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              158,400
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             2,237,400
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         2,237,400
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                2,237,400
<EPS-BASIC>                                      3.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    3.53



</TABLE>