alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice of closed meetings.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the provisions of section 10 of Public Law 92-463, the Federal Advisory Committee Act, notice is hereby given of closed meetings of the Department of Defense Wage Committee.

# DATES:

Tuesday, December 14, 2010; at 10 a.m. and Tuesday, December 28, 2010; at 10 a.m.

# ADDRESSES:

1400 Key Boulevard, Level A, Room A101, Rosslyn, Virginia, 22209

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Additional information concerning the meetings may be obtained by writing to the Chairman, Department of Defense Wage Committee, 4000 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Under the provisions of section 10(d) of Public Law 92-463, the Department of Defense has determined that the meetings meet the criteria to close meetings to the public because the matters to be considered are related to internal rules and practices of the Department of Defense and the detailed wage data to be considered were obtained from officials of private establishments with a guarantee that the data will be held in confidence.

However, members of the public who may wish to do so are invited to submit material in writing to the chairman concerning matters believed to be deserving of the Committee's attention.

      ( print page 71081)    
Dated: November 16, 2010.

Morgan F. Park,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 2010-29336 Filed 11-19-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
§ 1493.60 Certifications required for program participation. ( a ) When making the statement required by §§ 1493.30(a)(7), 1493.40(a)(9), or 1493.50(a)(6), each Exporter, U.S. Financial Institution and Foreign Financial Institution applicant for program participation is certifying that, to the best of its knowledge and belief: ( 1 ) The applicant and any of its principals (as defined in 2 CFR 180.995) are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or excluded from covered transactions by any U.S. Federal department or agency;
( 2 ) The applicant and any of its principals (as defined in 2 CFR 180.995) have not within a three-year period preceding this application been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State, or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statues or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property;
( 3 ) The applicant and any of its principals (as defined in 2 CFR 180.995) are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (a)(2) of this section;
( 4 ) The applicant and any of its principals (as defined in 2 CFR 180.995) have not within a three-year period preceding this application had one or more public transactions (Federal, State or local) terminated for cause or default;
( 5 ) The applicant does not have any outstanding nontax debt to the United States that is in delinquent status as provided in 31 CFR 285.13;
( 6 ) The applicant is not controlled by a person owing an outstanding nontax debt to the United States that is in delinquent status as provided in 31 CFR 285.13 (e.g., a corporation is not controlled by an officer, director, or shareholder who owes a debt); and
( 7 ) The applicant does not control a person owing an outstanding nontax debt to the United States that is in delinquent status as provided in 31 CFR 285.13 (e.g., a corporation does not control a wholly-owned or partially-owned subsidiary which owes a debt).
( b ) *Additional certifications for U.S. and Foreign Financial Institution applicants.* When making the statement required by § 1493.40(a)(9) or § 1493.50(a)(6), each U.S. and Foreign Financial Institution applicant for program participation is certifying that, to the best of its knowledge and belief: ( 1 ) The applicant and its Principals are in compliance with all requirements, restrictions and guidelines as established by the applicant's regulators; and
( 2 ) All U.S. operations of the applicant and its U.S. Principals are in compliance with U.S. anti-money laundering and terrorist financing statutes including, but not limited to, the USA Patriot Act of 2001, and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977.
[79 FR 68596, Nov. 18, 2014, as amended at 84 FR 28186, June 18, 2019]
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-14-0618 SAT Date: 6/20/2014 Print Date: 7/23/2014

Related cases : Health related cases: Ecotox related cases : N o reasonable analogs were found.

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1-2 2 Health: SAT recommends that this material be forwarded to DHS ; Eco:

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 2 11

Exposure Based Review : Health: Ecotox: N o Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Drinking Water Inhalation Ecotox: All releases to water Fate: ; Keywords : Keywords: IRR; MUTA; SENS; N EURO (UNCERT); DEVEL (UNCERT); AQUATOX Summary of Assessment :
Fate : Fate Summary: P-14-0618 FATE:

VP = 1.5E-6 torr at 25 C (E)
log Koc = 1.00 (E) log Fish BCF = 0.50 (E) log Fish BAF = -0.05 (E)POTW removal (%) = 0-90 via sorption Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = U Sorption to soils/sediments = low PBT Potential: P2B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = rapid

Health : Health Summary: N ot absorbed through the skin as the neat material moderate absorption through the skin if in solution, good absorption from the lung and GI tract ( p che m ). Concern for irritation, mutagenicity and sensitization and uncertain concern for neurotoxicity based on the moiety. Uncertain concern for developmental toxicity based on the moiety.

Ecotox : Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 >100 daphnid 48-h LC50 >100 green algal 96-h EC50 0.957 fish

_ chronic value 9.9 daphnid

_ chronic value 1.9
algal

_ chronic value 0.234
Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for acrylamides; SAR chemical class = acrylamides, MW = 153; p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and nominal concentrations; hardness <180.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 23

SARs acrylamides SAR Class acrylamides Ecotox Category Acrylamides
Ecotox Factors Comments:
SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Brown, True Name Jerry Fields, Appellant.

Judgment Supreme Court, New York County, rendered on July 26, 1978, unanimously affirmed. Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. (See *Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur— Birns, J..P., Sullivan, Markewich, Lupiano and Silverman, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1955

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1955 appear at 80 FR 9895, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### §§ 1955.83-1955.99 [Reserved]
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 223 (Friday, November 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70961-70962]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29229]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7233]


Notice of Meeting of the Advisory Committee on International Law

    A meeting of the Advisory Committee on International Law will take 
place on Thursday, December 9, 2010, from 9:30 a.m. to approximately 
5:30 p.m., at the George Washington University Law School (Michael K. 
Young Faculty Conference Center, 5th Floor), 2000 H St., NW., 
Washington, DC. The meeting will be chaired by the Legal Adviser of the 
Department of State, Harold Hongju Koh, and will be open to the public 
up to the capacity of the meeting room. It is anticipated that the 
agenda of the meeting will cover a range of current international legal 
topics, including international piracy; sovereign immunity of foreign 
government officials; U.N. resolutions and fundamental rights under 
European Union law; contemporary issues in the law of armed conflict; 
transnational environmental issues; and corporate social 
responsibility. Members of the public will have an opportunity to 
participate in the discussion.
    Members of the public who wish to attend the session should, by 
Friday, December 3, 2010, notify the Office of the Legal Adviser 
(telephone: 202-776-8451) of their name, professional affiliation, 
address, and telephone number. A valid photo ID is required for 
admittance. A member of the public who needs reasonable accommodation 
should make his or her request by December 2, 2010; requests made after 
that time will be considered but might not be possible to accommodate.


[[Page 70962]]


    Dated: November 15, 2010.
Danielle Morris,
Office of Claims and Investment Disputes, Office of the Legal Adviser, 
Executive Director, Advisory Committee on International Law, Department 
of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-29229 Filed 11-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certifications of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ruths
Chris Steak House, Inc. for the quarter ended March 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Assistant
Secretary of Ruths Chris Steak House, Inc., certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Ruths Chris Steak House, Inc.

Date: May 9, 2008



By:

/s/ Robert M. VincentRobert M. VincentExecutiveVice President and Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Ruths
Chris Steak House, Inc. and will be retained by Ruths Chris Steak House, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 29.2618 Rule 2.

The determination of a grade shall be based upon a thorough examination of a lot of tobacco or of an official sample of the lot.
§ 1b.1 Purpose. ( a ) This part supplements the regulations for implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), for which regulations were published by the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) in 40 CFR parts 1500 through 1508. This part incorporates and adopts those regulations.
( b ) This part sets forth Departmental policy concerning NEPA, establishes categorical exclusions of actions carried out by the Department and its agencies, and sets forth those USDA agencies which are excluded from the requirement to prepare procedures implementing NEPA.
[48 FR 11403, Mar. 18, 1983, as amended at 60 FR 66481, Dec. 22, 1995]
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Volcom, Inc. (the Company) for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Richard R. Woolcott, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Douglas P. Collier, as Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (i) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Volcom, Inc. and will be retained by Volcom, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                    |  |  |  |                                                                                       
|------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 11, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Richard R. Woolcott                                                               
|                    |  |  |  | Richard R. Woolcott Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer (Principal Executive Officer)



|                    |  |  |  |                                                                                                                            
|------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: May 11, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Douglas P. Collier                                                                                                     
|                    |  |  |  | Douglas P. Collier Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer (Principal Financial
Officer)

The foregoing certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350.
These certifications shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall they be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 1791 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2014 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to codify 

authority under existing grant guidance authorizing use 

of Urban Area Security Initiative and State Homeland 

Security Grant Program funding for enhancing medical 

preparedness, medical surge capacity, and mass prophylaxis capabilities. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

HR 1791 RFS 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medical Preparedness 

5 Allowable Use Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. USE OF CERTAIN HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT 

7 FUNDS FOR ENHANCING MEDICAL PRE8 PAREDNESS, MEDICAL SURGE CAPACITY, 

9 AND MASS PROPHYLAXIS CAPABILITIES. 

10 Section 2008 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 

11 (6 U.S.C. 609) is amended— 

12 (1) in subsection (a), by redesignating para13 graphs (10) through (13) as paragraphs (11) 

14 through (14), respectively, and by inserting after 

15 paragraph (9) the following: 

16 ‘‘(10) enhancing medical preparedness, medical 

17 surge capacity, and mass prophylaxis capabilities, in18 cluding the development and maintenance of an ini19 tial pharmaceutical stockpile, including medical kits, 

20 and diagnostics sufficient to protect first responders, 

21 their families, immediate victims, and vulnerable 

22 populations from a chemical or biological event;’’; 

23 and 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

HR 1791 RFS 

1 (2) in subsection (b)(3)(B), by striking 

2 ‘‘(a)(10)’’ and inserting ‘‘(a)(11)’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 3, 

2014. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Cite as State v. Brooks, 2021-Ohio-2236.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO 

ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT 

TRUMBULL COUNTY

STATE OF OHIO, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 - v - 

FRANK J. BROOKS, JR., 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

CASE NO. 2021-T-0026 

 

Criminal Appeal from the 

Court of Common Pleas 

Trial Court No. 2019 CR 00840 

M E M O R A N D U M 

O P I N I O N 

Decided: June 30, 2021 

Judgment: Appeal dismissed 

Dennis Watkins, Trumbull County Prosecutor, Administration Building, Fourth Floor, 

160 High Street, N.W., Warren, OH 44481 (For Plaintiff-Appellee). 

David L. Engler, Engler Law Firm, 181 Elm Road, N.E., Warren, OH 44483 (For 

Defendant-Appellant). 

CYNTHIA WESTCOTT RICE, J. 

{¶1} On June 7, 2021, appellant, Frank J. Brooks, Jr., through counsel, filed a 

notice of appeal from the trial court’s May 5, 2021 entry sentencing appellant to serve six 

years in prison consecutive to his current prison sentence in Portage C.P. No. 19 CR 226 

and pay a mandatory fine of $10,000. 

{¶2} A timely notice of appeal was due no later than June 4, 2021, which was 

not a holiday or weekend. The appeal is untimely by three days. 
2 

Case No. 2021-T-0026 

{¶3} “* * * [A] party who wishes to appeal from an order that is final upon its entry 

shall file the notice of appeal required by App.R. 3 within 30 days of that entry.” App.R. 

4(A)(1). 

{¶4} “(1) After the expiration of the thirty day period provided by App.R. 4(A) for 

the filing of a notice of appeal as of right, an appeal may be taken by a defendant with 

leave of the court to which the appeal is taken in the following classes of cases: 

{¶5} “(a) Criminal proceedings; * * * 

{¶6} “(2) A motion for leave to appeal shall be filed with the court of appeals and 

shall set forth the reasons for the failure of the appellant to perfect an appeal as of right. 

* * *.” App.R. 5(A). 

{¶7} Appellant has neither complied with the thirty-day rule set forth in App.R. 

4(A)(1) nor sought leave to appeal under App.R. 5(A). Thus, this court is without 

jurisdiction to consider his appeal. Appellant has a remedy of filing an untimely criminal 

appeal under App.R. 5(A). 

{¶8} Appeal dismissed, sua sponte, as untimely. 

THOMAS R. WRIGHT, J., 

MATT LYNCH, J., 

concur.
Case 7:20-cv-00113-MCR-GRJ Document 139 Filed 03/25/22 Page 1 of 3
Case 7:20-cv-00113-MCR-GRJ Document 139 Filed 03/25/22 Page 2 of 3
REDACTED

Case 7:20-cv-00113-MCR-GRJ Document 139 Filed 03/25/22 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 11

                 Statement re Computation of Per Share Earnings
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>



                                                                                      November 30,

                                                                                  1996                     1995
                                                                                  ----                     ----
<S>                                                                               <C>                       <C>    

Fully Diluted:
  Average Shares Outstanding Disregarding Dilutive                                                  
    Convertible Preferred Stock                                                 7,991,997                 7,966,186                 

  Assuming Conversion at beginning of Year of:
     $10 Convertible Preferred Stock                                            1,000,000                     ---
     10% Convertible Preferred Stock                                               57,600                    57,600          
      8% Convertible Preferred Stock                                              103,333                   103,333
     12% Convertible Preferred Stock                                               95,238                    95,238
                                                                               -----------                -----------
  Shares Outstanding                                                            9,248,168                 8,222,357
                                                                               ===========                ===========
Income (Loss) Available to Common Stockholders for Fully Diluted
  Calculations                                                               $ (3,881,428)              $(1,754,013)
                                                                             ==============             ==============
Per Share Amount:
   Net Loss                                                                  $       (.42)              $      (.21)
                                                                             ==============             =============
</TABLE>

This calculation is submitted in accordance with Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Release  No.  9083  although  it is contrary to para 48 of APB No. 15 because it
produced an antidilutive result.

                                                                                
                                       38

<PAGE>
#### Agostino Damico, Appellant, v Hertz Corp. et al., Respondents.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff *861appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated October 26, 1979, which granted his motion to increase the *ad damnum*clause for the first cause of action to the extent of permitting an increase to $750,000 and (2) so much of a further order of the same court, dated January 4, 1980, as, upon reargument, adhered to its original determination. Appeal from order dated October 26, 1979, dismissed as academic. Said order was superseded by the order dated January 4, 1980. Order dated January 4, 1980 reversed insofar as appealed from, order dated October 26, 1979 vacated, and motion granted in its entirety by permitting an increase in the *ad damnum*clause to $2,000,000. The appellant is awarded one bill of $50 costs and disbursements. The affirmations submitted by plaintiff justify allowing him to increase the *ad damnum*clause as requested. Damiani, J. P., Lazer, Gibbons and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
#### § 28.160 Cotton examiners on foreign exchanges.

Whenever any association or exchange in any country other than the United States shall adopt the universal standards and establish them as the basis of all transactions and contracts for American upland cotton, made and executed according to its rules, the Director may appoint certain members or officials of such exchanges as cotton examiners. Insofar as the administration of the act applies to cotton involved in contracts made in accordance with the rules of such exchange, the administration shall be as prescribed in §§ 28.161 through 28.162.