alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
– Temporary Revision

PSM NO.: 1–2–2 AIRCRAFT: DHC-2 BEAVER SERIES: ALL

PUBLICATION: MAINTENANCE MANUAL TEMPORARY REVISION NO.: 2-38

______________________________________________________________________________

RECORDING INSTRUCTIONS:

Record this Temporary Revision No. and the relevant information in the appropriate columns of the

TEMPORARY REVISION INDEX provided at the front of the manual.

Appendix 2 Part 3 (TR 2-38)

Page 1 of 2

04 March, 2015

Insert in Appendix 2 Part 3, after page 10

PERIODIC INSPECTIONS

REASON FOR ISSUE:

To add Elevator Control Rod Assembly to Periodic Inspection.

ACTION:

In Appendix 2, Part 3, insert item 20A.

INSP. DUE ITEM NO.

4th 20A. Inspect the Elevator Control Rod, Elevator Actuating Lever, and the Column

Torque Tube for corrosion, cracks and/or other damage, in accordance with

paragraph 2.43A.
Temporary Revision No. 2-38 (Cont’d)

Appendix 2 Part 3 (TR 2-38)

Page 2 of 2

04 March, 2015

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I,Michael A. Schneider, President and Chief Executive Officer of Affinity GroupHolding, Inc., certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AffinityGroup Holding, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures, (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant, andwe have:

(a)     Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)     Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered bythis report based on such evaluation; and

(c)     Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a)     Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)     Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting.

 
| Date:  August 13,  2007 |   /s/ Michael A. Schneider               |   |
|-----------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                              |   Michael  A. Schneider                  |
|                              |   President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Editorial Note on Part 246
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 246 appear at 76 FR 35097, June 16, 2011.

§ 246.24 Procurement and property management. ( a ) *Requirements.* State and local agencies shall ensure that subgrantees comply with the requirements for the nonprocurement debarment/suspension requirements and, if applicable, the lobbying restrictions as required in 2 CFR part 180, OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Government-wide Debarment and Suspension, 2 CFR part 200, subpart E and USDA implementing regulations 2 CFR part 400, part 415, and part 417 concerning the procurement and allowability of food in bulk lots, supplies, equipment and other services with Program funds. These requirements are adopted to ensure that such materials and services are obtained for the Program in an effective manner and in compliance with the provisions of applicable law and executive orders.
( b ) *Contractual responsibilities.* The standards contained in A-130 and 2 CFR part 200, subpart D and Appendix II, Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards and USDA implementing regulations 2 CFR part 400 and part 415 do not relieve the State or local agency of the responsibilities arising under its contracts. The State agency is the responsible authority, without recourse to FNS, regarding the settlement and satisfaction of all contractual and administrative issues arising out of procurements entered into in connection with the Program. This includes, but is not limited to, disputes, claims, protests of award, source evaluation, or other matters of a contractual nature. Matters concerning violation of law are to be referred to such local, State or Federal authority as may have proper jurisdiction.
( c ) *State regulations.* The State or local agency may use its own procurement regulations which reflect applicable State and local regulations, provided that procurements made with Program funds adhere to the standards set forth in A-130 and 2 CFR part 200, subpart D and Appendix II, Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Entity Contracts Under Federal Awards and USDA implementing regulations 2 CFR part 400 and part 415.
( d ) *Property acquired with Program funds.* State and local agencies shall observe the standards prescribed in 2 CFR part 200, subpart D and USDA implementing regulations 2 CFR part 400 and part 415 in their utilization and disposition of real property and equipment, including automated data processing equipment, acquired in whole or in part with Program funds.
[50 FR 6121, Feb. 13, 1985, as amended at 59 FR 11508, Mar. 11, 1994; 81 FR 66494, 66495, Sept. 28, 2016]
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:03-cr-00059-MP-AK

JEROME WAYNE JOHNSON,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on a letter requesting clemency for the defendant, which

has been filed as a Motion for Clemency, Doc. 227. This Court is without authority to grant

requests for clemency. Therefore, the Motion for Clemency, Doc. 227, is DENIED. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 2nd day of March, 2010

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that the Special Medical Advisory Group will meet on December 1, 2010, in Room 830 at VA Central Office, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, from 8:30 a.m. to 3 p.m. The meeting is open to the public.

The purpose of the Group is to advise the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and the Under Secretary for Health on the care and treatment of disabled Veterans, and other matters pertinent to the Department's Veterans Health Administration (VHA).

The agenda for the meeting will include discussions on the direction of VHA; healthcare reforms impact on VHA; enhancing the role of the Group; VA compensation and effect; and an update on the Blue Ribbon Panel on VA-Medical School Affiliations Report.

                    Any member of the public wishing to attend should contact Juanita Leslie, Office of Administrative Operations (10B2), Veterans Health Administration, at (202) 461-7019 or e-mail at                     *j.t.leslie@va.gov.*                     No time will be set aside at this meeting for receiving oral presentations from the public. Statements, in written form, may be submitted to Ms. Leslie before the meeting or within 10 days after the meeting.                

Dated: November 15, 2010.

By Direction of the Secretary.

Vivian Drake,

Acting Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2010-29186 Filed 11-18-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
Exhibit
10.46


 


 


2005
Short-term Incentive Plan Description


 


Under the Company’s short-term incentive
plan, annual cash bonuses are awarded taking into account an individual’s “target
bonus percentage” (a percentage of such participant’s base salary), individual
performance and the Company’s performance against established business and/or
financial goals (corporate payout factor). 
Each of the named executive officers is a participant in the short-term
incentive program.  For 2005, the
Compensation Committee established (i) earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and amortization and (ii) cash from operations less capital
expenditures as the two financial performance measures under the program, each
of which is weighted equally.  Under the
plan, a bonus equal to a multiple of the named executive officer’s target bonus
percentage will be paid depending on the level of performance achieved by the
Company with respect to the financial performance measures described above in
accordance with the following matrix:


 


	
  Performance Measure

  	
   

  	
  Corporate Payout Factor

  	
   

  
	
  EBITDA

  	
   

  	
  Cash
  from Operations less CapEx

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Threshold 85% of Business
  Plan

  	
   

  	
  Threshold
  55% of Business Plan

  	
   

  	
  0%

  	
   

  
	
  Target 100% of Business
  Plan

  	
   

  	
  Target
  100% of Business Plan

  	
   

  	
  100%

  	
   

  
	
  Maximum 110% of Business
  Plan

  	
   

  	
  Maximum
  135% of Business Plan

  	
   

  	
  200%

  	
   

  



 


 


The bonus factor is interpolated between
threshold and target and target and maximum based on actual performance.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8081

ARGENTINE R. HAIRSTON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

RC MATHENE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior 

District Judge. (7:09-cv-00152-jlk-mfu)

Submitted: June 3, 2010 Decided: June 18, 2010

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Argentine R. Hairston, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Drummond 

Bagwell, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Argentine R. Hairston seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). 

When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Hairston has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 

13, 2019

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-19-00243-CV

DIANA GORDON OFFORD, WINTER GORDON, JR. AND JOYCE 

STEIN, Appellants 

V.

PURPLE MARTIN LAND COMPANY, LLC, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 268th District Court 

Fort Bend County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 15-DCV-225272 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

This is an appeal from a judgment signed February 21, 2019. On July 25, 

2019, appellants filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The 

motion is granted. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. 

PER CURIAM 

Panel Consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Zimmerer.
#### § 2620.3 Requests.

Requests for OIG records shall be submitted to OIG's Office of Counsel and will be processed in accordance with subpart A of part 1 of this title. Specific guidance on how to submit requests (including current contact methods) is available through OIG's Web site, *https://www.usda.gov/oig/foiareq.htm,* and USDA's public FOIA Web site.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter C of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter C appear by Amdt. 381, 65 FR 64586, Oct. 30, 2000.

#### § 283.7 Procedures upon failure to file an answer.

The failure by FNS to file an answer shall constitute a waiver of hearing. Upon such failure to file, the State agency shall file a proposed decision, along with a motion for adoption thereof, both of which shall be served upon FNS by the State agency. Within 10 days after service of such motion and proposed decision, FNS may file objections thereto. If the ALJ finds that meritorious objections have been filed, the State agency's motion shall be denied with supporting reasons. If meritorious objections are not filed, the ALJ shall issue an initial decision without further procedures or hearing. Copies of the initial decision or denial of the State agency's motion shall be served on each of the parties and shall be included as part of the official record. Where the decision as proposed by the State agency is adopted as the ALJ's initial decision, such decision of the ALJ shall become final and effective 30 days after service in accordance with § 283.17(c)(2) unless reconsideration or review by the Judicial Officer is sought as discussed in §§ 283.17(d) and 283.20.
EXHIBIT 31

CERTIFICATION

     Pursuant to the requirements of Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, James R. Musick provides the following certification.

     I, James R. Musick, President, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer of Vitro Diagnostics, Inc. ("Company"), certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

     4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
Company and have:

          a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
     material information relating to the Company is made known to me by others,
     particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
     prepared;

          b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls
     and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
     annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

          c. Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
     evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

     5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the Company's
auditors and the audit committee of our board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

          a. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
     controls which could adversely affect the Company's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
     Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls, and

          b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
     other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal
     controls; and

     6. I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: February 4, 2004                      /s/ James R. Musick
----------------------                      -------------------
                                            James R. Musick, President and
                                            Chief Executive Officer
§ 25.602 Eligible recipients. ( a ) *General.* The grants made under this subpart shall be made to the lead managing entities on behalf of the Round II rural empowerment zones and Round IIS rural enterprise communities, respectively, in accordance with an approved strategic plan. Such grants shall be available to successor entities approved in writing by USDA.
( b ) *Exception.* The funding official, with the approval of the Office of Community Development, may elect to award all or part of the available grant funds to an alternate grantee.
( c ) *Subrecipients.* The grantee shall relay funds to subrecipients, as provided in the approved strategic plan, as soon as practicable.
§ 1787.14 General waivers. ( a ) The Administrator may issue a general waiver for all RUS Borrowers for a determinate period, if the Administrator finds that such manufactured or unmanufactured goods are in shortage regionally or nationally, so as to avoid the administrative burden of issuing individual, specific waivers.
( b ) The Administrator has determined that it is in the best interest of RUS to issue a permanent general public interest waiver from the Buy America requirements for “small purchases,” which shall be published in the Federal Register for each program under the RE Act and amended as needed from time to time. In carrying out this exception, however, the Administrator shall ensure that contracts are not artificially fragmented.
2007 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit 3-6-2007 

# S i l va-Re ngi fo v

. Atty Ge n U SA P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : P r e c e de nt i al D ocke t N o . 04-4302

F o l low thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : http://d i git alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a nova . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2007

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou ght t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit or y

. It h as be e n a c c ept e d for inclusion in 2007 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit or y

. F or mor e inform at ion, p le as e c ont a ct Be n j amin . C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du . Re c omme nde d C it at ion " S i lva -Re n gi fo v

. Atty Ge n U SA" (2007). 2007 D e cisio n s . P ape r 1398. http://d i git alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a nova . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2007/1398P RE CE DE NT I AL UN I TED STATES CO UR T OF A PP EALS F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT

_____________________ N os : 04- 4302, 05- 3423

_____________________ CA RL OS S I L VA- RE NGI F O, Pet i t i oner v. ATTO RN EY G ENER AL O F TH E U N I TED STA TES; U N I TED STA TES DE P AR T M E NT OF HOMEL AND S E CU RI T Y,

R es pondent

____________________ C o n so lid a ted P e tit io n s f o r R e v iew O f

a F in a l O rd e r o f

R e m o v a l F ro m th e B o a rd o f

Im m ig ra tio n A p p e a ls

____________________ A r gued Sept ember27, 2006 B e f o re : M c K E E a n d A M B R O , C i r cui tJudges , and

R E ST A N I , * Judge

_____________________ ( O pi ni on fi l ed: J anuary8, 2007)

_____________________ * T he H onor abl e J ane A . R es t ani , C hi ef J udge of the U ni t ed St at es C our tof I nt ernat i onal T r ade, s i t t i ng bydes i gnat i on.2 OR DE R A M E ND I NG P UB L I S HE D O P I NI ON M C K E E , C i r cui tJudge I ti s now or der ed thatt he publ i s hed O pi ni on i n t he above cas e fi l ed J anuary8, 20 07 , be am end ed as fo l l ow s: In th e f ir st sen tenc e o f f

o o tno te si x , p ag e 6 5 , rep lace the w o rd “ an d ” w ith the w o rd “or ”, s o t hatt he phr as e r eads : “G overnm ent al acqui es cenc e undert he Tortur e C onvent i on h a s b e e n d e f

in e d to in c lu d e g o v e rn m e n ts w h o a re u n a b le o r u n w ill in g to p ro tec t th e ir c itiz e n s f ro m p e rs e c u tio n .”
B yth e C o u rt , / s /T heodor e A . M ckee C i r cui tJ udge
D at ed: M ar ch 6, 2007 C M D / cc: A l exande rE . E i s emann, E s q. M ar k D es N oy er , E s q. A l i s on R . D rucker , E s q. D ougl as E . G i ns bur g, E s q. D onal d E . K eene r , E s q. W i l l i am C . Peache y , E s q. J onathan Pot t er , E s q.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John J. Esposito, Appellant.

Judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered August 27, 1979, affirmed. No opinion. This case is remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). Gulotta, J. P., Cohalan, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.