ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; South Carolina; Approval of Section 

1 lO(a)(l) Maintenance Plan for the 1997 8-Hour Ozone Standard for Cherokee County; 

Correcting Amendment 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule; Correcting Amendment. 

SUMMARY: On June 1,2009, EPA published a direct final rule approving the Clean Air Act 

(CAA) Section 110(a)(l) Maintenance Plan for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard for Cherokee 

County as a revision to the South Carolina State Implementation Plan (SIP). In EPA's direct 

final rule, there was an inadvertent error in the format of the Cherokee County entry in table (e) 

which contains South Carolina's Non-Regulatory Provision in the Code of Federal Regulations. 

This action corrects that formatting error. 

DATES: This action is effective [Insert date of publication in the Federal Registerl. 

ADDRESSES: Copies of the documentation used in the action being corrected are available for 

inspection during normal business hours at the following location: U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region 4,61 Forsyth Street, SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The 
Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding 

federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Zuri Farngalo, Regulatory Development 

Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4,61 Forsyth Street, SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303- 

8960. Mr. Farngalo's telephone number is 404-562-9 152. He can also be reached via electronic 

mail at farng;alo.zuri@epa.~ov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

EPA is making a correction to the Cherokee County CAA 110(a)(l) Maintenance Plan 

entry that appears in table (e), of the South Carolina Non-Regulatory provisions section at 40 

CFR 52.2120(e). This revision to South Carolina's SIP was published in the Federal Register on 

June 1,2009 (74 FR 26099), effective August 1,2009. However, when the direct final rule 

approving this SIP revision was published, table (e) did not include the correct table format. 

EPA is correcting this inadvertent error by inserting the correctly formatted table (e) into South 

Carolina's Identification of Plan section of the Code of Federal Regulations at 40 CFR 

EPA has determined that today's action falls under the "good cause" exemption in 

section 553(b)(3)(B) of the Administrative Procedure Act (MA) which, upon finding "good 

cause," authorizes agencies to dispense with public participation where public notice and 

comment procedures are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest. Public 

notice and comment for this action are unnecessary because today's action to correct a 

2 
formatting error in the Code of Federal Regulations has no substantive impact on EPA's June 1, 

2009, approval of this regulation. The incorrectly formatted text in table (e) in EPA's final rule 

published on June 1,2009, makes no substantive difference to EPA's analysis as set out in that 

rule. In addition, EPA can identify no particular reason why the public would be interested in 

being notified of the correction of this revision, or in having the opportunity to comment on the 

formatting correction prior to this action being finalized, since this formatting correction action 

does not change the meaning of the regulation at issue or otherwise change EPA's analysis of 

South Carolina's submittal (74 FR 26099). EPA also finds that there is good cause under APA 

section 553(d)(3) for this formatting correction to become effective on the date of publication of 

this action. Section 553(d)(3) of the APA allows an effective date less than 30 days after 

publication "as otherwise provided by the agency for good cause found and published with the 

rule." 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3). The purpose of the 30-day waiting period prescribed in APA section 

553(d)(3) is to give affected parties a reasonable time to adjust their behavior and prepare before 

the final rule takes effect. Today's rule, however, does not create any new regulatory 

requirements such that affected parties would need time to prepare before the rule takes effect. 

Rather, today's rule merely corrects an inadvertent error of omission in the regulatory text of a 

prior rule by adding a correctly formatted table (e) for the South Carolina regulation which EPA 

approved on June 1,2009. For these reasons, EPA finds good cause under APA section 

553(d)(3) for this correction to become effective on the date of publication of this action. 

Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies 

with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 

3 
U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve 

state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely 

approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements 

beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action: 

is not a "significant regulatory action" subject to review by the Office of Management 

and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993); 

does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork 

Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 

entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small 

governments, as described in the Unfuncted Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 

104-4); 

does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 

43255, August 10,1999); 

is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject 

to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 1321 1 (66 FR 28355, 

May 22,2001); 

is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and 

Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those 

requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and 
does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, 

disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally 

permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13 175 (65 

FR 67249, November 9,2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law. 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business 

Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take 

effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the 

rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA 

will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the 

U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to 

publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after 

it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a "major rule" as defined by 5 U.S.C. 

804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(l) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be 

filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by [FEDERAL REGISTER 

OFFICE: insert date 60 davs from date of ~ublication of this document in the Federal Register]. 

Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the 

finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which 
a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule 

or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements 

(See section 307(b)(2)). 
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Intergovernmental relations, 

Incorporated by reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, 

Volatile organic compounds. 

Dated: 121 1'1 ) 09 

12/14/09 

& 

J. Scott Gordon 

Acting Regional Administrator, 

Region 4. 
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52--[AMENDED] 

1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart PP - South Carolina 

2. Section 52.2120(e) is amended by adding a new entry for the "Cherokee County 8-Hour 

Ozone Section 110(a)(l) Maintenance Plan for the 1997 8-hour ozone standard" to read as 

follows: 

g 52.2120 Identification of plan. 

* * * * 

(e) * * * 

EPA approved South Carolina Non-Regulatory Provisions 

I Provision 

* * 

Cherokee County 1 10(a)(l) 

Maintenance Plan for the 1997 8-Hour 

Ozone Standard 

State 

Effective 

date 

EPA approval date 

* * 

June 1,2009 ( FR 

12546) 

[Insert citation of 

publication] 

Explanation