alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

 PENSACOLA DIVISION 

RICHARD KEVIN KLINE, 

Petitioner, 

v. Case No. 3:20cv4491-LC/MAF 

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Respondent. 

 / 

ORDER

 

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of 

the U.S. Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 15) that the petition for writ of habeas 

corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, be denied. The parties have 

been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been 

afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 

No objections have been filed. 

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have 

determined it should be adopted. 

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 15) is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this order. 

Case 3:20-cv-04491-LC-MAF Document 16 Filed 08/20/21 Page 1 of 2
2. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “The petition for writ of 

habeas corpus filed by Richard Kevin Kline pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 is 

DENIED. Any certificate of appealability is DENIED and leave to appeal in 

forma pauperis is also DENIED.” 

3. The Clerk shall close the file. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 19th day of August, 2021. 

 s/L.A. Collier 

 LACEY A. COLLIER 

 SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 3:20-cv-04491-LC-MAF Document 16 Filed 08/20/21 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                             5
<LEGEND>
                  This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
                  from  Superior  Wireless,  Inc.  December  31, 1998  financial
                  statements  and is  qualified  in its entirety by reference to
                  such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                                 0000793986
<NAME>                                Superior Wireless Communications, Inc.



<S>                                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                               YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                                DEC-31-1999

<CASH>                                                      2,131
<SECURITIES>                                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                0
<INVENTORY>                                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                            2,131
<PP&E>                                                      83,666
<DEPRECIATION>                                              (64,044)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              351,806
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       2,540,909
<BONDS>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                       0
<PREFERRED>                                                 0
<COMMON>                                                    1,680
<OTHER-SE>                                                  (2,190,783)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                351,806
<SALES>                                                     7,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            7,000
<CGS>                                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               906,005
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          240,363
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             (899,005)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         (899,505)
<DISCONTINUED>                                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             369,366
<CHANGES>                                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                                (530,139)
<EPS-BASIC>                                               (.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                               (.33)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with Igene Biotechnology, Inc. (the "Company")
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I, Edward  J.  Weisberger,  Chief
Financial  Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18  U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934, as amended; and

          (2)   The  information contained in the  Report  fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  March 31, 2010      By:  /S/ EDWARD J. WEISBERGER
                                _________________________________
                                    EDWARD J. WEISBERGER
                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                    (principal financial officer)

A  signed original of this written statement required by  Section
906  has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company  and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
or its staff upon request.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1944

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1944 appear at 80 FR 9885, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1944.67 Ineligible activities.

The packager may not charge fees or accept compensation or gratuities directly or indirectly from the very low- and low-income families being assisted under this program. The packager may not represent or be associated with anyone else, other than the applicant, who may benefit in any way in the proposed transaction. If the packager is compensated for this service from other sources, then the packager is not eligible for compensation from this source except as permitted by Agency. Grantees who are funded to do Self-Help Housing, may not be reimbursed for packaging applications for participation in the Self-Help Housing effort.

[58 FR 58643, Nov. 3, 1993, as amended at 61 FR 39851, July 31, 1996]
#### §§ 27.61-27.72 [Reserved]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCTS

Case No. 3:19md2885

LIABILITY LITIGATION

This Document Relates to: 

Adkins, 7:20cv012

Judge M. Casey Rodgers

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones

DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS ORDER NO. 2

This Order addresses Defendants’ objections and counter-designations to 

Plaintiff’s affirmative deposition designations and Plaintiff’s objections to 

Defendants’ counter-designations thereto for the following witness depositions:

1. Yan, Xiaotian (2020-11-04)

2. Berger, Elliot (2015-10-08)

3. Kieper, Ron (2019-12-19) REVISED

4. Ohama, Dan (2020-11-17)

5. Berger, Elliot (2020-09-25) 30b6 REVISED

SO ORDERED this 8th day of September, 2021.

M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 7:20-cv-00012-MCR-GRJ Document 82 Filed 09/08/21 Page 1 of 1
INVENTORY EXPERT SERVICE REPORT 

IES-ORDER NUMBER: 189182 

REGISTRY NUMBER: 1337404-11-1 

CA INDEX NAME 

Siloxanes and Silicones, 

di-Me, hydrogen- terminated, polymers with hydroxy- and 

[(trimethylsilyl)oxy] - terminated bicyclo[2 . 2.l)hept-2-yl hexyl 

silsesquioxanes-di-Me, Me vinyl siloxanes polymers 

Please print the above CA Index Name on the appropriate page of your PMN. ~ ~ If this box is checked, CAS has made correction(s) marked in red to your IES order. Please make the same correction(s) to your PMN before 

submitting it to the EPA. 

CAS 2540 Olentangy River Road P.O. Box 3343 Columbus, Ohio 432 10-0334 USA
#### § 29.1002 Body.

The thickness and density of a leaf or the weight per unit of surface. (See Elements of Quality Chart.)
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

RICHARD BRYSON MOORE

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 3499

[ February 6, 2020 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Jeffrey Dana Gillen

, Judge; L.T. Case No s

. 50 2017CF006339AMB, 50 2017CF006340AMB,

50 2 017CF006341AMB, 50 2017CF006344AMB, 50 2017CF006348BMB,

50 2017CF006460AMB and 50 2017CF006462AMB

.

Richard Bryson Moore, Sneads, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS

, C IKLIN and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1962

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1962 appear at 80 FR 9902, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1962.45 Reporting sales.

Form RD 1955-3, “Advice of Property Acquired,” will be prepared and distributed according to the FMI when property is acquired by Rural Development.

[50 FR 45783, Nov. 1, 1985, as amended at 80 FR 9904, Feb. 24, 2015]
**Exhibit 32.1****Certification of Chief Executive Officer****Pursuant to****Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended **September 30, 2005**(the “Report”) of **Patriot Capital Funding, Inc.**(the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, **Richard P. Buckanavage,**the Chief Executive Officerand President of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Registrant.     /s/     Richard P. Buckanavage     Name: Richard P. Buckanavage  Date: November 14, 2005
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:03-cr-00055-MP-GRJ-1

RAYMOND LOZANO, JR, 

Defendant. 

_____________________________/ 

O R D E R

 This cause comes on for consideration upon the Magistrate Judge's 

Report and Recommendation dated September 6, 2016. ECF No. 92. The 

parties have been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and 

have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, 

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). Petitioner has filed objections on ECF 

No. 93. I have made a de novo review based on those objections. 

 Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the timely 

filed objections, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation 

should be adopted. 

 Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: 

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 

92, is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order. 

Case 1:03-cr-00055-WTH-GRJ Document 94 Filed 10/11/16 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 1:03‐cr‐00055‐MP‐GRJ‐1

2. Petitioner’s Motion to Amend or Correct Sentence pursuant to 

Amendment 794 and 28 U.S.C. § 2255, ECF No. 91, is 

SUMMARILY DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as the 

Court does not have jurisdiction to consider it. 

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. 

4. The clerk is directed to close the file. 

SO ORDERED on October 11, 2016. 

 s/Mark E. Walker 

 United States District Judge 

Case 1:03-cr-00055-WTH-GRJ Document 94 Filed 10/11/16 Page 2 of 2
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5 the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-30861 Summary Calendar

MYRTLE M. ROBINSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 98-CV-1287 June 6, 2000 Before GARWOOD, BENAVIDES and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Myrtle M. Robinson appeals the district court’s affirmance of the Social Security Commissioner’s denial of supplemental security income. She contends that the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) finding that her nonexertional mental impairment was non-severe violated the remand order of the Appeals Council, contravenes governing case law, and is not supported by the2

evidence. Robinson also avers that the ALJ failed to combine her mental impairment with her other impairments found severe at Step 2 of the sequential process and erred by relying solely on the Medical Vocational Guidelines to deny benefits at Step 5 of the sequential process. Based upon a careful review of the record, the briefs, and applicable law, we conclude both that there was substantial evidence in the record to support the Commissioner’s decision that Robinson was not disabled at any point during the relevant period and that the Commissioner used proper legal standards in evaluating the evidence. See villa v. Sullivan , 895 F.2d 1019, 1021 (5th Cir. 1990). The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1951

#### Editorial Notes:

1. Some of the exhibits referenced in this part 1951 are not published in the Code of Federal Regulations. Exhibits are available in any Rural Development office.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1951 appear at 80 FR 9890-9894, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1951.206 Forms.

Forms utilized for actions under this subpart are to be modified appropriately where necessary to adapt the forms for use by corporate recipients rather than individuals.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS

EARPLUG PRODUCTS LIABILITY

LITIGATION

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: 

CISEK et al v. 3M COMPANY et al

Case No.: 3:22-cv-21686-MCR-HTC

MDL NO. 2885

Hon. Judge M. Casey Rodgers

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE

TO FILE AMENDED SHORT FORM COMPLAINTS

 Upon Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to file an Amended Complaint and for good cause as

shown, it is hereby ordered that Plaintiffs may file Amended Complaints as attached to their

Motion.

DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Pensacola, Escambia County, Florida, this 

______ day of January 2023. 

__________________________________

CHIEF JUDGE M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3647-3 Filed 01/24/23 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 10.39
 MERIDIAN BIOSCIENCE, INC.
2004 EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN
 RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT
PERFORMANCE AWARD
 Summary of Restricted Stock Award Grant
  Name of Grantee:Number of Shares:Grant Date:
    
    11/12/2009
    
    
    
    :Vesting Dates:
    
    25%
    
    11/12/2010(Providing Earnings
    
    25%
    
    11/12/2011Target Achieved)
    
    25%
    
    11/12/201225%
    
    11/12/2013
 Terms of Agreement
 1. Grant of Restricted Stock Awards.
 2. Vesting of Restricted Shares.
    3. Forfeiture of Restricted Shares.




---



##### 



4. Payment.
   5. Restrictive Legend.
 6. Transferability.
 7. Dividend, Voting and Other Rights.
 8. Continuous Employment.
 9. No Employment Contract.
 10. Relation to Other Benefits.
 11. Taxes and Withholding.
 12. Adjustments.
 13. Compliance with Law. provided, however,




---



##### 



14. Amendments.
 15. Compliance with Section 409A of the Code.
 16. Severability.
 17. Relation to Plan.
 18. Successors and Assigns.
 19. Governing Law.
 20. Electronic Delivery.




---



##### 



MERIDIAN BIOSCIENCE, INC.By:Name:
    Melissa LuekeTitle:
    Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2
                   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
         SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Annual Report of Research
Frontiers Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Joseph M. Harary, President, Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer
and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange
     Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of
     operations of the Company.

/s/ Joseph M. Harary
Joseph M. Harary
President and Chief Executive Officer,
Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer
March 10, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance  Sheet  at  December  31, 1998 and the Statements of Income and
Comprehensive Income for the Year  ended  December  31,  1998  and   is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          18,011
<SECURITIES>                                   288,305
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,579
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,191
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 309,086
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           52,013
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     257,073
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   309,086
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,151
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,868
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,283
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.56
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2191 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2191

  To direct the Secretary of Transportation to issue regulations with 
 respect to ensuring families are able to sit together on flights, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2013

  Mr. Nadler (for himself, Ms. Hahn, Mr. Rangel, and Mrs. Carolyn B. 
Maloney of New York) introduced the following bill; which was referred 
         to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To direct the Secretary of Transportation to issue regulations with 
 respect to ensuring families are able to sit together on flights, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Families Flying Together Act of 
2013''.

SEC. 2. SEATING FAMILIES TOGETHER ON FLIGHTS.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall issue 
regulations directing each air carrier to--
            (1) establish a policy to ensure, to the extent 
        practicable, that a family that purchases tickets for a flight 
        with that air carrier is seated together during that flight; 
        and
            (2) make the policy described in paragraph (1) available to 
        the public on an appropriate Internet Web site of the air 
        carrier.
    (b) Definitions.--In this section, the following definitions apply:
            (1) Air carrier.--The term ``air carrier'' has the meaning 
        given that term in section 40102(a) of title 49, United States 
        Code.
            (2) Family.--The term ``family'' means a grouping of 
        individuals that includes, at a minimum--
                    (A) a child who is 12 years of age or younger; and
                    (B) an individual who is--
                            (i) 18 years of age or older; and
                            (ii) responsible for accompanying that 
                        child, including a parent or legal guardian of 
                        that child.
                                 <all>
```
98-666.

#### Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Fuqua.

On April 7, 1998, movant filed a motion to show cause why respondent should not be punished for contempt for failure or refusal, without just cause or just excuse, to obey the commands of the court to appear in response to the subpoena *duces tecum*issued by the Board of Commissioners on the Unauthorized Practice of Law and to produce the documents the production of which was ordered by the subpoena *duces tecum.*

IT IS ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that the Board of Commissioners on the Unauthorized Practice of Law be granted leave to intervene.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that the Board of Commissioners on the Unauthorized Practice of Law file an *amicus*brief, discussing the issues raised in the motion, within twenty days of the date of this entry.