**GAO-06-611SP**                      Published: Apr 21, 2006. Publicly Released: Apr 21, 2006.                  

-   
-   
-   
-   

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Status of FY22 Projects 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

Skip to Highlights

## Highlights

As part of a study GAO conducted to determine the feasibility and usefulness of providing customized minimum payment disclosures to credit cardholders, we interviewed a total of 112 cardholders in three U.S. cities on their views of various minimum payment disclosures. This document represents a facsimile of the interview guide that we administered to cardholders and includes the results to the closed-ended interview questions. The cardholders recruited for the interviews generally resembled the demographic makeup of the U.S. population in terms of age, education level, and income. However, because our sample did not form a random, statistically representative sample of the U.S. population, the results of our interviews can not be generalized to the entire U.S. population of credit cardholders. Additionally, we selected proportionally more cardholders who typically carry card balances (revolvers) than those who typically pay their outstanding balance in full every month (convenience users). Our sample of 112 cardholders consisted of 74 revolvers (66 percent) and 38 convenience users (34 percent). In administering this guide, cardholders were shown three different sample credit card disclosure statements on the consequences of making minimum payments. We rotated the order in which we showed the disclosure statements to cardholders to control for the learning that could occur during the interview session that could influence their answers in the latter part of the interview. While these one-on-one interviews were administered in-person by an interviewer reading aloud from this guide, respondents were also simultaneously shown cards that listed available answer choices for the closed-ended questions that had several possible answer choices. The interviews were conducted in December 2005 in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards. A more detailed discussion of our scope and methodology is contained in our report, Credit Cards: Customized Minimum Payment Disclosures Would Provide More Information to Consumers, but Impact Could Vary GAO-06-434.

## Supplemental Material

                              - Background Information
                              - Instructions for Viewing This Survey
                              - The Interview Guide and Results

----

## Office of Public Affairs

### Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
kaczmareks@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

### Public Inquiries

Public Affairs
PublicAffairs@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

## Topics

Human Capital

Consumer protectionCreditCredit bureausFinancial institutionsFinancial recordsInformation disclosureLending institutionsCredit cardsLevel of educationEducational standards