alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS






We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements and related Prospectuses of our report dated February 5, 1997, except
for Note 5, for which the date is March 1, 1997, and Note 18, for which the date
is March 14, 1997, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and
the financial statement schedules of UNUM Corporation and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1996 and 1995, and for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995, and
1994, which report is included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K:



           Form S-8 No. 33-31270 pertaining to the UNUM Employees Retirement
           Savings Plan and Trust

           Form S-8 No. 33-19090 pertaining to the 1987 Executive Stock Option
           Plan

           Form S-8 No. 33-38225 pertaining to the 1990 Long-Term Stock
           Incentive Plan

           Form S-8 No. 33-52741 pertaining to the 1990 Long-Term Stock
           Incentive Plan

           Form S-3 No. 33-36873

           Form S-3 No. 33-69132

           Form S-8 No. 33-60124 pertaining to the Colonial Companies, Inc.
           Security Saver Plan

           Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 on Form S-8 to Registration Statement
           on Form S-4 No. 33-55870

           Form S-3 No. 333-08187





/s/ COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
Portland, Maine
March 25, 1997
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Ruths Hospitality Group, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter
ended March 27, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 6,
2011



By

/s/ MICHAEL P. ODONNELLMichael P. ODonnellPresident and Chief Executive Officer of
Ruths Hospitality Group, Inc.
98-1612.

#### State v. Hughes.

Stark App. No. 97CA0356. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the following issue found at page 1 of the court of appeals’ Order Certifying a Conflict dated July 21,1998:

> “Does the longer 270-day statutory speedy trial provision, R.C. 2945.71(C)(2), apply to misdemean- or counts which are joined with a felony count in a single indictment?”

*1434The conflict cases include *State v. Doane*(1990), 69 Ohio App.3d 638, 591 N.E.2d 735, and *State v. Walton*(1991), 77 Ohio App.3d 706, 603 N.E.2d 294.
EXHIBIT 3.9

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                       TO THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF
                            WORLD INTERNETWORKS, INC.

         In accordance with the requirements of Section 78.385 and 78.390 of the
Nevada Revised Statutes,  the Articles of Incorporation of World  Internetworks,
Inc., a Nevada  corporation  (the  "Company") are hereby amended as set forth in
this Certificate of Amendment.

         1. Prior to the filing of this  Certificate  of Amendment,  the name of
the Company has been World Internetworks, Inc.

         2. Pursuant  to  this  Certificate  of  Amendment,   Article  I of  the
Company's Articles of Incorporation shall be amended as follows:

         "ARTICLE I NAME: The name of the Corporation is GTDATA Corporation."

         3. Except as set forth in paragraph 2 of this Certificate of Amendment,
the Articles of Incorporation shall remain the same as previously constituted.

         4. This  Certificate  of Amendment,  and the amendment to the Company's
Articles of Incorporation  contemplated  herein,  has been approved by unanimous
resolution of the Company's Board of Directors,  in a manner consistent with the
provisions of Section 78.390 of the Nevada Revised Statutes.

         5. This  Certificate  of Amendment,  and the amendment to the Company's
Articles of Incorporation  contemplated herein, has been approved by the holders
of a majority of the Company's  outstanding  shares,  as required  under Section
78.390  of  the  Nevada   Revised   Statutes  and  the  Company's   Articles  of
Incorporation,  pursuant to an action without a meeting,  in accordance with the
requirements of Section 78.320 of the Nevada Revised Statutes.

         6. The number of common shares entitled to vote on the amendment to the
Articles of Incorporation was 16,029,956.

         7. The  number of common  shares  voted in favor of the  amendment  was
8,632,519, with none opposing and none abstaining.

                                       By: /s/ Robert Genesi
                                       ---------------------
                                       Robert Genesi, President & Secretary
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Candela Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-K for the period ending July 2, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gerard E. Puorro, Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Gerard Puorro       |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Gerard E. Puorro        |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |
| September 29, 2005 |   |
|                         |        |  |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          62,755
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             610
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                24,861
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    268,934
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         165,378
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           170,428
<LOANS>                                      1,288,005
<ALLOWANCE>                                     16,863
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,867,542
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,577,282
<SHORT-TERM>                                    67,987
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             20,230
<LONG-TERM>                                     27,906
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,804
<OTHER-SE>                                     161,439
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,867,542
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                108,778
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               27,641
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,942
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               138,361
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              62,389
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              66,693
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           71,668
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    3,599
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 216
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 46,404
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 31,864
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      31,864
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,179
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.61
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.51
<LOANS-NON>                                     20,169
<LOANS-PAST>                                       899
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                14,726
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    2,486
<RECOVERIES>                                       437
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               16,863
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            16,863
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
<FN>
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

CASE NO: 1:20-54-RH-GRJ

JESSE HIEBLER, on behalf of himself and

all others similarly situated,

vs.

AK SECURITY SERVICES, LLC,

Defendant.

/

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

Plaintiffs, JESSE HIEBLER, and DAVID CARBONARO, by and through undersigned 

counsel hereby file their Notice of Settlement and advise this Court that the Parties have fully 

resolved this dispute and are in the process of preparing and finalizing the necessary documents to 

present to this Court for approval. 

Dated this 11th day of May 2020.

Respectfully Submitted,

USA EMPLOYMENT LAWYERS -

JORDAN RICHARDS, PLLC

805 E. Broward Blvd. Suite 301

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301

(954) 871-0050

Counsel for Plaintiffs

By: /s/ Jordan Richards

JORDAN RICHARDS, ESQUIRE

Florida Bar No. 108372

jordan@jordanrichardspllc.com

melissa@jordanrichardspllc.com

jake@jordanrichardspllc.com

Case 1:20-cv-00054-RH-GRJ Document 14 Filed 05/11/20 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing motion was filed through CM/ECF this 11th of 

May, 2020. 

By: /s/ Jordan Richards

JORDAN RICHARDS, ESQUIRE

Florida Bar No. 108372

SERVICE LIST

HEATHER MEGLINO, ESQUIRE

Florida Bar No. 91857

heather@spirelawfirm.com

SPIRE LAW, LLC

12249 Science Drive, Suite 155

Orlando, Florida 32826

Counsel for Defendant

Case 1:20-cv-00054-RH-GRJ Document 14 Filed 05/11/20 Page 2 of 2
#### § 29.19 Inspector.

Person employed, licensed, or authorized by the Secretary to determine and certify the type, grade, condition, or other characteristics of tobacco.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 218 (Friday, November 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 69461]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28526]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application

    Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 958(i), the Attorney General shall, prior to 
issuing a registration under this Section to a bulk manufacturer of a 
controlled substance in schedule I or II, and prior to issuing a 
regulation under 21 U.S.C. 952(a)(2) authorizing the importation of 
such a substance, provide manufacturers holding registrations for the 
bulk manufacture of the substance an opportunity for a hearing.
    Therefore, in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34(a), this is notice 
that on June 28, 2010, Wildlife Laboratories, 1401 Duff Drive, Suite 
400, Fort Collins, Colorado 80524, made application by renewal to the 
Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as an importer 
of Etorphine Hydrochloride (9059), a basic class of controlled 
substance listed in schedule II.
    The company plans to import the listed controlled substance for 
sale to its customer.
    Any bulk manufacturer who is presently, or is applying to be, 
registered with DEA to manufacture such basic class of controlled 
substance may file comments or objections to the issuance of the 
proposed registration, and may, at the same time, file a written 
request for a hearing on such application pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.43, 
and in such form as prescribed by 21 CFR 1316.47.
    Any such comments or objections should be addressed, in 
quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement Administration, Office of 
Diversion Control, Federal Register Representative (ODL), 8701 
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be filed no 
later than December 13, 2010.
    This procedure is to be conducted simultaneously with, and 
independent of, the procedures described in 21 CFR 1301.34(b), (c), 
(d), (e), and (f). As noted in a previous notice published in the 
Federal Register on September 23, 1975, (40 FR 43745-46), all 
applicants for registration to import a basic class of any controlled 
substance in schedule I or II are, and will continue to be, required to 
demonstrate to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion 
Control, Drug Enforcement Administration, that the requirements for 
such registration pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 958(a); 21 U.S.C. 823(a); and 
21 CFR 1301.34(b), (c), (d), (e), and (f) are satisfied.

    Dated: November 1, 2010.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-28526 Filed 11-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED 
FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
CASH FLOW AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENNTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-29-1996
<CASH>                                       1,199,384
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   51,604
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    225,414
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,567,480
<PP&E>                                       7,942,678
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,767,931
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,873,421
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,568,285
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,650
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,201,577
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,873,421
<SALES>                                     14,588,835
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,665,465
<CGS>                                        7,330,749
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,639,627
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               775,411
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                10,719
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              73,656
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,908,959
<INCOME-TAX>                               (3,662,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,570,959
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,570,959
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.48
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.48
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10(g)

                          FIDELITY SOUTHERN CORPORATION

                              DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

        Each non-employee director of Fidelity Southern Corporation (the
"Company") receives a $10,000 annual retainer, paid in four quarterly
installments. In addition, each non-employee director receives $2,000 for each
Board of Directors' meeting attended and $1,000 for each committee meeting
attended.

        Directors who are employees of the Company do not receive a fee for
attending Board of Directors or committee meetings.
** Exhibit 32.1**

Certification of Principal Executive OfficerPursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/Afor the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the “Report”) of Federal ServicesAcquisition Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Joel R. Jacks, Chairman and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Registrant.

Date: December 5,2006
|        | By:        | /s/    Joel  R. Jacks |
|--------|------------|-------------------------------------------|
|   | ** ** | **Joel R.  Jacks**                        |
|   | ** ** | **Chairman  and Chief Executive Officer** |
|   | ** ** | **(Principal  Executive Officer)**        |

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

 PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 3:97cr49/LAC

ENRIQUE CHAVEZ-GALVAN

___________________________________________/

ORDER

THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon an “affidavit” filed by Defendant,

Enrique Chavez-Galvan. The document (doc.158) has no title, but the first paragraph reads:

Affidavit of conditional acceptance of respondents’ that the United States

District Court is an Article I and Article IV court for DC only, and the

executive, legislative and judicial branch’s of government are guilty of

“treason” et al., and attached exhibits as “estoppelled by latches” and for

specific value” by a totally secured man or woman under U.C.C. et al.

This document makes no sense whatsoever in the context of this case. To the extent

Defendant intended the document to be a motion requesting some relief from the Court, the

motion is denied.

SO ORDERED this 18th day of July, 2006.

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

 Senior United States District Judge

Case 3:97-cr-00049-LC Document 159 Filed 07/18/06 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

     Certain of Phosphate Resource Partners Limited Partnership's subsidiaries are listed below.  These subsidiaries are all included in the Phosphate Resource Partners Limited Partnership'sconsolidated financial statements, and collectively, together with Phosphate Resource Partners Limited Partnership, account for more than 90 percent of the total assets of Phosphate Resource Partners Limited Partnership and earnings.

|  
 State of Organization

Name Under Which it Does Business

Agrico Chemical Company

Delaware

Same

IMC Phosphates Company

Delaware

Same

IMC Phosphates MP, Inc.

Delaware

Same

 

 

 

 

*Return to PLP Form10-K* |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

CRAIG WARREN JACKSON,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 3:20cv3628-MCR-MAF

MARK S. INCH, Secretary,

Department of Corrections,

Respondent.

 /

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the 

U.S. Magistrate Judge. ECF No. 11. The parties have been furnished a copy of 

the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file 

objections pursuant 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Petitioner’s objections have been 

reviewed de novo. ECF No. 12. The Court has determined the Report and 

Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 11, is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this Order. 

2. The § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 1, is DENIED.

Case 3:20-cv-03628-MCR-MAF Document 14 Filed 03/02/22 Page 1 of 2
3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED and leave to appeal in forma 

pauperis is also DENIED. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 2nd day of March 2022.

M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-03628-MCR-MAF Document 14 Filed 03/02/22 Page 2 of 2
113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2291 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 450 Lexington Avenue in New York, New 

York, as the ‘‘Vincent R. Sombrotto Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 2291 EH

1 SECTION 1. VINCENT R. SOMBROTTO POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 450 Lexington Avenue in New 

4 York, New York, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Vincent R. Sombrotto Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Vincent R. Sombrotto 

10 Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives July 14, 2014. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

113TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2291 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostSombrotto Post Office’’. New York, New York, as the ‘‘Vincent R. al Service located at 450 Lexington Avenue in
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCTS

Case No. 3:19md2885

LIABILITY LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

Baker, 7:20cv39

Judge M. Casey Rodgers

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones

DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS ORDER NO. 10

This Order addresses Plaintiff’s objections and counter-designations to 

Defendants’ affirmative deposition designations and Defendants’ objections to 

Plaintiff’s counter-designations thereto for the following witness depositions:

1. Murphy, William (2021-01-15)

2. Santoro, Marc (2019-12-03)

SO ORDERED, on this 11th day of June, 2021.

M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 7:20-cv-00039-MCR-GRJ Document 167 Filed 06/11/21 Page 1 of 1
#### § 27.41 Lost certificate; duplicate.

Upon the written request of the last holder of a valid cotton class certificate and a showing to the satisfaction of the Area Director of the Marketing Services Office which issued such certificate, that it has been lost or destroyed and, if lost, that diligent effort has been made to find it without success, a new certificate shall be issued without the reclassification of the cotton and without a new Micronaire determination for the cotton. Such new certificate shall bear the same number and date of issuance as the lost or destroyed certificate, and shall include a statement to the effect that it is a duplicate issued in lieu of the lost or destroyed original, as the case may be.

[48 FR 49211, Oct. 25, 1983]