UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q (Mark One) þQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2012 or oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Commission File No. 000-52141 CASCADE TECHNOLOGIES CORP. (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter) Wyoming98-0440633(State or other jurisdiction of(I.R.S. Employerincorporation or organization)Identification Number)250 N. Robertson Blvd.
Suite 427Beverly Hills, California90211(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code) Registrants telephone number, including area code:(310) 858-1670 Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed from last report.   Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þNo o  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):  Large accelerated filer o                                                                Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer   o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)        Smaller reporting companyþ   Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o       No þ   The number of shares outstanding of Registrant’s common stock, par value $0.01, as of March 31, 2012, was 214,789,397.   CASCADE TECHNOLOGIES CORP.Index to Form 10-Q Quarterly Report
to the Securities and Exchange Commission PageNo.Part I  Financial InformationItem 1Condensed Consolidated Financial StatementsCondensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2012 (unaudited) and December 31, 2011.3Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 and for the period from February 25, 2004 (Inception) to March 31, 2012.4Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 and for the period from February 25, 2004 (Inception) to March 31, 2012.5Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Deficit (unaudited) for the period from February 25, 2004 (Inception) to March 31, 2012.6Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)7Item 2Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations16Item 3Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk18Item 4TControls and Procedures18Part II Other InformationItem 1Legal Proceedings21Item 1ARisk Factors21Item 2Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds21Item 3Defaults Upon Senior Securities21Item 4Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders21Item 5Other Information21Item 6Exhibits21      PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION  ITEM 1. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS   Cascade Technologies Corp. (A Development Stage Company) CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS March 31,
2012December 31, 2011ASSETS(unaudited)Current AssetsCash and cash equivalents$   108,975$   140,364Prepaid expenses12,60024,682Grant proceeds receivable6,47014,630Other assets3,6473,647Total current assets131,692183,323Property and equipment, net of depreciation58,04761,820Patents, net--Deferred debt issuance costs, net of amortization of $53,101 in 2012 and $39,066 in 2011187,338141,378Deposits3,3503,350Total Assets$   380,427$   389,871LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS DEFICITCurrent LiabilitiesAccounts payable and accrued expenses$    511,141$   492,532Due to officers32,35932,359Note Payable, less discount of $13,393 and $18,750  in 2012 and 201186,60781,250Total Current Liabilities630,107606,141Long-term LiabilitiesNotes payable, less discount of $636,285 in 2012 and $672,497 in 2011613,715377,503Derivative liability515,469515,502Total Long-term Liabilities1,129,184893,005Total Liabilities1,759,2911,499,146Commitments and ContingenciesStockholders deficitCommon stock  no par value, 750,000,000 shares authorized, 214,789,397 and 212,089,397 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively518,855518,585Additional paid-in capital1,799,5771,628,234Accumulated deficit during development stage(3,697,296)(3,256,094)Total Stockholders Deficit(1,378,864)(1,109,275)Total Liabilities and Stockholders Deficit$     380,427$     389,871  The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.    Cascade Technologies Corp. (A Development Stage Company) CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (unaudited) Three month period ended March 31,From February 25, 2004 (Inception) through March 31, 201220122011ExpensesProfessional expenses$    82,265$     39,176$    771,929Rent10,06010,05593,825Depreciation3,7743,77428,943Salary and other compensation expense171,315148,6982,155,292Impairment of intangible assets--19,450Patent royalties--1,901Consulting and outside services103,6903,313414,898Other general and administrative30,29622,981264,774Total operating loss(401,400)(227,997)(3,751,012)Other Income and ExpenseGrant income25,44033,120404,701Interest income--563Interest expense(65,275)(31,172)(5,038,422)Change in value of derivative liability33(2,330)4,686,874(39,802)(382)53,716Net loss$   (441,202)$  (228,379)$ (3,697,296)Net loss per share applicable to common shareholders:basic$ 0.00$ 0.00diluted$ 0.00$ 0.00Weighted average number of shares used in computing net loss per share of Common Stock:basic213,444,342192,789,397diluted213,444,342192,789,397  The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.   Cascade Technologies Corp. (A Development Stage Company) CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited) Three month period ended March 31,From February 25, 2004 (Inception) through March 31, 201220122011OPERATINGNet loss$  (441,202)$  (228,379)$ (3,697,296)Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash flows from operating activities:Depreciation3,7743,77428,943Patent amortization and impairment--19,629Amortization of deferred issuance costs14,0352,21760,238Proceeds advanced (repaid) from stockholder--22,709Excess value of derivative liability over related loan proceeds--4,493,960Amortization of note discount41,56927,325431,438Stock based compensation33,15832,0141,107,004Common shares issued for services98,460-500,220Change in valuation of derivative liability(33)2,330(4,686,874)Decrease (increase) in grant proceeds receivable8,160145,166(6,470)(Increase) decrease in other assets-2,702(3,647)(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses12,0824,689(12,600)Increase in deposits--(3,350)Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses18,608(9,102)524,264Cash used in operating activities(211,389)(17,264)(1,221,832)INVESTINGPurchase of property and equipment--(86,989)Patent costs--(19,629)Cash used in investing activities-(106,618)FINANCINGNet proceeds from issuance of convertible notes180,000-1,437,425Cash provided by financing activities180,000-1,437,425Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents(31,389)(17,264)108,975Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period140,36423,217-Cash and cash equivalents, end of period$  108,975$     5,953$  108,975SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:Cash paid during the year for:Interest$            -$            -$             -Income taxes$            -$            -$             -Common stock issued for services$  98,460$            -$ 500,220During October 2010, $100,000 of notes payable were converted to common shares.
During May and July 2011, $100,000 of notes payable were converted to common shares.  The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.  Cascade Technologies Corp. (A Development Stage Company) CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIT (unaudited) Common StockAdditional Paid-in CapitalAccumulated DeficitSubscription ReceivableTotalNo. SharesAmountBalance at February 25, 2004 (Inception)115,549,157$            1$               -$                   -$               (1)$                 -Net loss for the period from February 25, 2004 (inception) through December 31, 2007---(12,709)-(12,709)Balance at December 31, 2007115,549,1571-(12,709)-(12,709)Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2008---(8,137)-(8,137)Balance at December 31, 2008115,549,1571-(20,846)-(20,846)Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2009---(8,688)-(8,688)Balance at December 31, 2009115,549,1571-(29,534)-(29,534)Stock subscription received----11Shares issued to employees for services40,0265,200---5,200Stock based compensation--636,622--636,622Shares issued in SMI acquisition75,020,214(1,796)---(1,796)Shares issued for outside services180,0009,000---9,000Shares issued for convertible notes2,000,000100,00089,123--189,123Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2010---(1,097,831)-(1,097,831)Balance at December 31, 2010192,789,397112,405725,745(1,127,365)-(289,215)Stock based compensation--432,024--432,024Warrants issued for debt issuance costs--100,275--100,275Shares issued to employee for services6,000,000192,000---192,000Shares issued for outside services11,300,000114,18086,580--200,760Shares issued for convertible notes2,000,000100,00052,494--152,494Discount on long-term convertible debt--231,116--231,116Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2011---(2,128,729)-(2,128,729)Balance at December 31, 2011212,089,397518,5851,628,234(3,256,094)-(1,109,275)Stock based compensation--33,158--33,158Warrants issued for debt issuance costs--39,995--39,995Shares issued for outside services2,700,00027098,190--98,460Net loss for the three month period ended
March 31, 2012---(441,202)-(441,202)Balance at March 31, 2012 (unaudited)214,789,397$ 518,855$ 1,799,577$ (3,697,296)$                  -$(1,378,864)  The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.  Cascade Technologies Corp. (A Development Stage Company) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements (unaudited) 1. Principal Business Activities and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies: Interim Financial Statements The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Cascade Technologies Corp. (Cascade, or the Company), a development stage company, have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for annual financial statements. However, the information included in these interim condensed consolidated financial statements reflects all adjustments (consisting solely of normal recurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for the fair presentation of the financial position and the results of operations.  Results shown for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be obtained for a full year.  The balance sheet information as of December 31, 2011 was derived from the audited financial statements included in Form 10K filed March 27, 2012. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with that report. Organization and Business Cascade is a development-stage, medical imaging device company. All medical device operations are being conducted by Cascades wholly owned subsidiary, Spectral Molecular Imaging, Inc. (SMI). SMI was incorporated on February 25, 2004 in Nevada and to date has not generated any revenues. The Companys financial statements are prepared using generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America applicable to a going concern which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. At March 31, 2012, the Company has an accumulated deficit of $3,697,296 and anticipates that it will continue to incur net losses for the foreseeable future in the development and commercialization of its product line. From inception up through the merger, the Company financed operations solely through short-term loans from a stockholder. In conjunction with the merger between Cascade and SMI in March 2010, additional working capital was obtained through the placement of $850,000 in convertible notes ($787,425 net of expenses) received on March 17, 2010. During 2011 and 2012 the Company secured $700,000 in proceeds from the placement of additional convertible notes, $600,000 of which were issued pursuant to a Placement Agent Agreement with a financial institution that was deemed finalized as of February 15, 2012.  The proceeds from these notes and grant receipts are expected to permit the Company to fund its anticipated levels of operations through the second quarter of 2012. Absent securing additional working capital, the Company may be unable to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that could result from the outcome of this uncertainty. The Company also faces certain risks and uncertainties which are present in many emerging medical device companies regarding product development, future profitability, ability to obtain future capital, protection of patents and property rights, competition, rapid technological change, government regulations, changing health care marketplace, recruiting and retaining key personnel, and third party manufacturing organizations. Merger with Spectral Molecular Imaging, Inc. Pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement), entered into by and between Spectral Molecular Imaging, Inc. (SMI), Cascade Technologies Corp., a Wyoming corporation (Cascade), and SMI Merger Sub, a Nevada corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Cascade (Merger Sub), dated as of March 8, 2010, Merger Sub merged into SMI effective on March 16, 2010, with SMI being the surviving entity (the Merger). As a result of the Merger, SMI became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Cascade. The transaction has been accounted for as a reverse acquisition and the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are those of SMI. As required by accounting guidance, authorized shares, issued and outstanding shares and per share amounts have been retroactively restated throughout these consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes to reflect Cascades capital structure.  Business Segments The Companys operations are confined to one business segment: the design and development of medical devices utilizing SMIs patented technology. Cash and Cash Equivalents The Company considers all highly liquid investment with a maturity at the date of purchase of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Property and Equipment Depreciation of property and equipment is provided for by the straight-line method over the five year estimated useful lives of the related assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of the assets useful lives or the remaining term of the lease. Intangible Assets Our policy is to protect our intellectual property by licensing or obtaining U.S. and foreign patents to protect technology, inventions, and improvements important to the development of our business. Patents are carried at cost less accumulated amortization which is calculated on a straight-line basis over a period of 15 years. The Company evaluates intangible assets for impairment, at least on an annual basis and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable from its estimated future cash flows. Recoverability of intangible assets and other long-lived assets is measured by comparing their net book value to the related projected undiscounted cash flows from these assets, considering a number of factors including past operating results, budgets, economic projections, market trends, and product development cycles. If the net book value of the asset exceeds the related undiscounted cash flows, the asset is considered impaired, and a second test is performed to measure the amount of impairment loss. Basis of Consolidation Our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the company and our wholly-owned subsidiary SMI. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Revenue Recognition The Company has not yet commenced the FDA review process for its products. Government Research Grants Government research grants that provide for payments to the Company for work performed are recognized as income when the related expenses are incurred. Income Taxes The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method of accounting for deferred income taxes (see also Note 8). The provision for income taxes includes federal and state income taxes currently payable and deferred taxes resulting from temporary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities. Valuation allowances are recorded to reduce deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will not be realized. With respect to uncertain tax positions, the Company would recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits to be recognized in the financial statements from such a position would be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate resolution. The Companys reassessment of its tax positions did not have a material impact on its results of operations and financial position.  Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires the use of estimates and assumptions by management that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Long-lived Assets The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. An asset is considered to be impaired when the sum of the undiscounted future net cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition exceeds its carrying amount. The amount of impairment loss, if any, is measured as the difference between the net book value of the asset and its estimated fair value. Research and Development Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Total research and development costs for the three month periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 and the period from February 25, 2004 (inception) to March 31, 2012 were as follows. Three month period ended
March 31,From February 25, 2004 (Inception) through
March 31, 201220122011Research and development costs$ 319,135$ 188,821$ 2,979,083  Fair Value of Financial Instruments The Company measures its financial assets and liabilities at fair value. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (i.e., exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Additionally, the Company is required to provide disclosure and categorize assets and liabilities measured at fair value into one of three different levels depending on the assumptions (i.e., inputs) used in the valuation. Level 1 provides the most reliable measure of fair value while Level 3 generally requires significant management judgment. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input significant to the fair value measurement. The fair value hierarchy is defined as follows: · Level 1  quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities, · Level 2  other significant observable inputs for the assets or liabilities through corroboration with market data at the measurement date, · Level 3  significant unobservable inputs that reflect managements best estimate of what market participants would use to price the assets or liabilities at the measurement date. The following table summarizes fair value measurements by level at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis: March 31, 2012December 31, 2011Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 1Level 2Level 3Derivative liability$           -$           -$ 515,469$           -$           -$ 515,502    The carrying amount of certain financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents and accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximates fair value due to the relatively short maturity of such instruments. The fair value of borrowings is not considered to be significantly different than its carry amount because the stated rates for such debt reflect current market rates. The following table sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of the Companys level 3 assets (conversion feature of notes payable) for the three month periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011. Three month period ended
March 31,Level 3 Assets - Derivative Liability20122011Beginning Balance$    515,502$    295,026Conversion feature issued-Changes in derivative liability(33)2,330Reclassification of derivative liability-Ending balance$   515,469$   297,356 The Company used the Black-Scholes option pricing model for estimating the fair value of the note conversion feature with the following assumptions: Period endedMarch 31, 2012December 31, 2011Expected remaining life in years4.765.01risk-free interest rate0.19%0.83%Volatility244%237%Dividend yield0%0% Stock-based compensation The Company records stock-based compensation in accordance with the provisions of ASC 718 CompensationStock Compensation. Net Loss per Common Share Basic and diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. The number of shares has been retrospectively restated to consider the effect of the stock dividend in March2010. 2.  Property and Equipment Property and equipment, at cost, consists of the following: December 31,
2011December 31,
2011Furniture$   5,254$   5,254Computer equipment81,73581,73586,98986,989Accumulated depreciation(28,942)(25,169)$  58,047$  61,820   Depreciation expense was $3,774, $3,774 and $28,943 for the three month periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, and from February 25, 2004 (inception) through March 31, 2012, respectively. 3.  Other Assets Deposits consist of one months prepaid rent for the corporate office. 4.  Patents The Company has a license agreement with Carnegie Mellon University (Carnegie Mellon) under which SMI is the exclusive worldwide licensee of certain rights for two patents issued to Carnegie Mellon: U.S. Patent No. 5796512 covers an optical-imaging system with an acousto-optic-tunable filter, and U.S. Patent No. 5841577 covers a light microscope having an acousto-optic-tunable filter. The uses licensed to SMI include spectral imaging for all clinical medical applications, including endoscopy and dermoscopy. The terms of the license agreement require an initial royalty of $400 per unit decreasing $20 per unit each year to a minimum of $200 per unit. The license agreement also provided for the issuance of 2% of SMIs common stock upon signing in May 2005 and provides for up to a 50% reduction of royalty payments for any amounts payable to third parties in order to utilize the licensed technology. In addition, SMI owns the rights to U.S. Patent No. 7428048 covering a non-invasive technique for the potential early detection of cancer and other abnormal tissues in the field of imaging-elastic-scattering spectroscopy. The cost of these patents to date amounted to $19,629, and due to the high uncertainty of future cash flows from these patents and the lack of operating history, the Company recorded impairment charges for the unamortized balance of $19,450 during the period from February 25, 2004 (inception) through December 31, 2008. 5.   Notes Payable Series 2011-A Convertible Notes During May 2011, the Company issued a Series 2011-A convertible note totaling $100,000 which bears interest at the rate of 15% and is due on November 16, 2012. The note is convertible at the option of the holder into Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.05 per share. Interest is payable on maturity, or earlier upon conversion, acceleration, or redemption. The Series 2011-A convertible note was sold pursuant to a referral agreement that provided for a cash payment equal to 10% of each note and 2,000,000 common stock warrant exercisable for $0.05 per share for a period of five years for each $100,000 increment of Series 2011 convertible notes. A total of $100,000 in convertible notes were placed pursuant to this referral agreement. Series 2011-B Convertible Notes During March 2012 and August and November 2011, the company issued Series 2011-B convertible notes totaling $600,000 which bear interest at the rate of 8% and are due five years from the date of issuance. The notes are convertible at the option of the holder into Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.06 per share. Interest is payable semi-annually in arrears, on January 15 and July 15 of each calendar year, beginning January 15, 2013, or earlier upon conversion, acceleration or redemption. The Series 2011-B convertible notes were sold pursuant to a referral agreement that provided for a cash payment equal to 10% of each note and warrants to acquire 1,000,000 shares of common stock exercisable at $0.06 per share for a period of five years for each $200,000 increment of Series 2011-B convertible notes. A total of $600,000 in convertible notes were placed pursuant to this referral agreement and, accordingly, the Company paid $60,000 in referral fees and committed to issue warrants to acquire 3,000,000 shares of common stock exercisable at $0.06 per share. With respect to the $200,000 in 2011-B convertible notes placed in August 2011, the Companys President and Chief Operating and Financial Officer, received $20,000 in referral fees related to his assistance in placing the notes. See Note 9: Related Party Transactions. Series 2010 Convertible Notes The Series 2010 convertible notes bear interest at the rate of 0.08% and are due December 31, 2016. The notes are convertible at the option of each holder into Common Stock at an initial conversion price of $0.182 per share, subject to adjustments in the event of stock splits, dividends or the like, and new share issuance. Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement between Cascade and SMI, on April 1, 2010 Cascade effected a share dividend of  2.64 additional shares of Cascade Common Stock for each one outstanding share of Cascade Common Stock (the Stock Dividend). The Stock Dividend increased the shares of common stock issued and outstanding from 52,354,223 to approximately 190,569,371 (after giving effect to share roundups). After completing the Stock Dividend the conversion price on the convertible notes adjusted from approximately $0.182 per share to $0.05 per share. The Series 2010 convertible notes are automatically converted into Common Stock on the first trading day following the date on which all of the following shall have occurred (and, as applicable, be continuing): (i) six months shall have elapsed from the initial issuance of the convertible notes (the Restricted Period) and (ii) either: (a) the closing price of the Common Stock on the principal exchange or inter-dealer quotation system on which it is traded shall be $0.25 (after giving effect to the Stock Dividend) or greater for 22 consecutive trading days (with the earliest such testing period commencing after the end of the Restricted Period) during which period the arithmetic mean of the trading volume of shares of Common Stock shall be at least 100,000 per trading day, or (b) a transaction shall have been consummated in which not less than $15 million in aggregate amount of Common Stock shall be issued by Cascade for consideration, the fair market value of which is not less than $15 million; provided, in each case that the Common Stock so issued to the Holder may be transferred without limitation as to amount pursuant to Rule 144 or pursuant to an effective resale registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933. In October, 2010, $100,000 of Series 2010 convertible notes payable elected to convert their notes to common stock and were issued a total of 2,000,000 shares of common stock. In May and July, 2011, an additional $100,000 of Series 2010 convertible notes payable elected to convert their notes to common stock and were issued a total of 2,000,000 shares of common stock. 6. Commitments and Contingencies Facility lease - The Company had a one year lease commencing November 15, 2009 on its corporate offices with monthly rental of $3,350 for an aggregate annual rent expense of $40,210. The lease has expired and the Company is renting the offices on a month to month basis. Cash concentration - The Company maintains its cash in bank deposit accounts which, at times, may exceed federally insured limits. Accounts are guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) up to $250,000 through December 31, 2013. The company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and does not believe that it is exposed to any significant credit risk on cash. 7.   Share Capital a) Authorized, issued and outstanding The Company has authorized 750,000,000 common shares, no par value. As of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 there were 214,789,397 and 212,089,397 common shares were issued and outstanding, respectively. b) Loss per share For the three month periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, the weighted average number of basic and diluted common shares outstanding was 213,444,342 and 192,789,397, respectively. 8.   Income Taxes The Company provides deferred income taxes for differences between the tax reporting bases and the financial reporting bases of assets and liabilities. The Company follows the accounting procedures established by FASB ASC 740, Income Taxes (formerly SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. At March 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company had no increase or decrease in unrecognized income tax benefits for the preceding periods. There was no accrued interest or penalties relating to tax uncertainties at March 31, 2012 and 2011. Unrecognized tax benefits are not expected to increase or decrease within the next twelve months. Should the  Company incur interest and penalties relating to tax uncertainties, such amounts would be classified as a component of interest expense and operating expense, respectively. The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and California. There are currently no income tax examinations underway for these jurisdictions, although the tax years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006 are all still open for examination. The Company does not recognize the deferred income tax asset at this time because the realization of the asset is less likely than not. The components of the Companys deferred income tax asset are related to loss carryforwards and impairment of intangible assets. A valuation allowance has been recorded for 100% of the deferred tax assets. The Company is in the process of determining the amount of net operating loss that can be used to offset future taxable income. Such benefits may be limited due to change in ownership. 9.   Related Party Transactions Gene Scher, the Companys President and Chief Operating and Financial Officer, received $20,000 in referral fees related to his assistance in placing $200,000 in convertible notes on August 10, 2011. An officer of the Company advanced the Company funds during the year ended December 31, 2011. The balance of these advances as of March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 is $16,500 and is payable on demand with no interest. A principal stockholder has advanced funds to the Company on an as needed basis. The balance due on these advances at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 is $15,859 and is payable on demand with no interest. 10. Stock-Based Compensation The Company's Board of Directors adopted the 2012 Stock Option Plan (the 2012 Plan) in April 2012 and the 2010 Stock Option Plan (the 2010 Plan) in June 2010 (collectively the Plans). The Plans both provides long-term incentives to employees, members of the Board, and advisers and consultants of the Company who are able to contribute towards the creation of or have created stockholder value by providing them stock options and other stock and cash incentives. Provisions such as vesting repurchase and exercise conditions and limitations are determined by the Board of Directors on the grant date. No Further shares will be granted under the 2010 Plan. The total number of shares that may be issued pursuant to the 2012 Plan shall not exceed 15% of the outstanding shares of the Companys common stock, subject to adjustment in the event of certain recapitalizations, reorganizations, and similar transactions. Generally, shares that are forfeited or canceled from awards under the Plans also will be available for future awards. Shareholder approval of the 2010 Stock Option Plan was not received within 12 months of approval by the Board and, accordingly, the options issued under this plan are not eligible for incentive stock option treatment pursuant to Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. As of March 31, 2012, 16,200,000 shares of common stock are available for issuance under the Plans. Stock options During the three month period ended March 31, 2012, the Company granted no options under the Plans. During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company granted 10,000,000 stock options under the 2010 Plan to certain employees, directors, and consultants. All of the stock options granted were vested immediately. During the year ended December 31, 2010 the Company granted 3,800,000 stock options under the 2010 Plan to certain employees, directors, and consultants. A total of 2,400,000 of the stock options were vested immediately and the balance vest monthly over a 24 month period. The exercise price and vesting period of each stock option is specified by the Board of Directors at the time of grant. The stock options expire five years after the grant date. The fair value of each stock option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The expected life assumption is based on the expected life assumptions of similar entities. Expected volatility is based on actual share price volatility the preceding twelve months. The risk-free interest rate is the yield currently available on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with an expected term ranging from 2.5 to 5 years used as the input to the Black-Scholes model. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods as options vest, if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.  As of March 31, 2012 there was $22,273 of total unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 0.19 years. 11.  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities During the three month period ended March 31, 2012, the Company issued a total of 2,700,000 shares of common stock pursuant to an agreement with the Companys investor relations firm. The issuance of shares was in consideration of services performed during this period. The shares were valued at market price on the date of issuance and compensation expense of $101,700 was recorded for the three month period ended March 31, 2012. 12.  Placement Agent Agreement On February 15, 2012 entered into a Placement Agent Agreement with Weston Financial Services, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (Weston). Per the agreement, Weston agreed to act as the Companys exclusive agent in connection with a private placement of up to $4,000,000 of notes to be issued by the Company (the Notes) and to use Westons commercially reasonable efforts in placing such Notes. Weston will be compensated with a 10% cash fee and 1,000,000 warrants to purchase Cascade common stock at $0.06 per share for every $200,000 in Notes placed. Pursuant to the agreement, the Notes will only be offered to accredited investors and, upon issuance, will be sold and issued pursuant to a Note Purchase Agreement. A total of $400,000 in convertible notes were placed in 2011 prior to the completion of the Placement Agent Agreement but are deemed to be part of the total amount contemplated by the agreement. No assurance can be given that the Company will receive any additional proceeds. As required by Weston  and as specified in the Note Purchase Agreement, providing that the Company receive gross proceeds of not less than $4,000,000, the Company is required to enter into a Contribution Agreement with Dr. Daniel Farkas, the Companys Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to which Dr. Farkas will contribute certain intellectual property, equity and certain other assets owned by Dr. Farkas to the Company in exchange for a 50 million  additional shares of common stock in the Company. Additionally, in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Placement, the Company anticipates undertaking a 1:30 reverse split of its common stock (the Reverse Split), changing its governing state from the State of Wyoming to the State of Nevada (the Re-Domiciliation) and adopting a 2012 Stock Option Plan (the 2012 Stock Option Plan). The Companys Board of Directors has approved the Reverse Split and the Re-Domiciliation, but has not yet finalized or approved the terms of the 2012 Stock Option Plan. 13.  New Accounting Pronouncements In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-11, "Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities." The amendments in this update require enhanced disclosures around financial instruments and derivative instruments that are either (1) offset in accordance with either ASC 210-20-45 or ASC 815-10-45 or (2) subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement, irrespective of whether they are offset in accordance with either ASC 210-20-45 or ASC 815-10-45. An entity should provide the disclosures required by those amendments retrospectively for all comparative periods presented. The amendments are effective during interim and annual periods beginning after December 31, 2012. The Company does not expect this guidance to have any impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08, Testing Goodwill for Impairment (ASU 2011-08), which amends the guidance in ASC 350-20, IntangiblesGoodwill and Other  Goodwill. ASU 2011-08 provides entities with the option of performing a qualitative assessment before calculating the fair value of the reporting unit when testing goodwill for impairment. If the fair value of the reporting unit is determined, based on qualitative factors, to be more likely than not less than the carrying amount of the reporting unit, the entities are required to perform a two-step goodwill impairment test. ASU 2011-08 was effective for us beginning January 1, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2011-08 did not  have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements or disclosures. In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASU 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (ASU 2011-04), which amended ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements(ASC 820), providing a consistent definition and measurement of fair value, as well as similar disclosure requirements between U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. ASU 2011-04 changes certain fair value measurement principles, clarifies the application of existing fair value measurement and expands the disclosure requirements. ASU 2011-04 was effective for us beginning January 1, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2011-04 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements or disclosures.  13.  Subsequent Event On April 24, 2012 the Company received an additional $250,000 from the placement of Series 2011-B convertible notes.  ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The unaudited financial statements of Cascade Technologies Corp. (Cascade, or the Company), a development stage company, have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for annual financial statements. However, the information included in these interim financial statements reflects all adjustments (consisting solely of normal recurring adjustments) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for the fair presentation of the financial position and the results of operations.  Results shown for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be obtained for a full year.  The balance sheet information as of December 31, 2011 was derived from the audited financial statements included in our annual report on Form 10K filed March 27, 2012. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with that report. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This report includes forward-looking statements. All statements other than statements of historical facts contained herein, including statements regarding our future financial position, business strategy and plans and objectives of management for future operations, are forward-looking statements. The words believe, may, will, estimate, continue, anticipate, intend, should, plan, expect and similar expressions, as they relate to us, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our financial condition, results of operations, business strategy and financial needs. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions as described in Risk Factors in our 10K filed March 27, 2012. Other sections of this report may include additional factors that could adversely affect our business and financial performance. Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for our management to predict all risk factors, nor can we assess the impact of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned that the foregoing lists of factors are not exhaustive. The forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q are made as of the date hereof and the Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except in accordance with applicable securities laws. The forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q are expressly qualified by this cautionary statement. Overview Pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement), entered into by and between Spectral Molecular Imaging, Inc. (SMI), Cascade Technologies Corp., a Wyoming corporation (Cascade), and SMI Merger Sub, a Nevada corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Cascade (Merger Sub), dated as of March 8, 2010, Merger Sub merged into SMI effective on March 16, 2010, with SMI being the surviving entity (the Merger). As a result of the Merger, SMI became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Cascade. The transaction has been accounted for as a reverse acquisition and the accompanying financial statements are those of SMI. Prior to the closing of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, there were 163,950,000 shares of  Cascade Common Stock issued and outstanding. In connection with the closing of the Merger: · The Company completed a private placement of $850,000 in principal amount of convertible notes; · The Company caused to be canceled promptly after the closing of the Merger an aggregate of 143,340,051 shares of Common Stock held by their pre-closing principal stockholder, who was also an officer and director of Cascade, for no cash consideration for the purpose of making Cascades capitalization more attractive to future equity investors; and · The Company effected a share dividend of 2.64 additional shares of Cascade Common Stock for each one outstanding share of Cascade Common Stock (the Stock Dividend). The Stock Dividend resulted in the shares of common stock issued and outstanding to increase from 52,354,223 to approximately 190,569,371  (after giving effect to share roundups). After giving effect to the Stock Dividend, the conversion price on our convertible notes adjusted from approximately $0.18 per share to $0.05 per share. Cascade is a development-stage, medical imaging device company. All medical device operations are being conducted by Cascades wholly owned subsidiary, Spectral Molecular Imaging, Inc. (SMI). Application of SMIs proprietary spectral-optical-imaging technologyoriginally developed for satellite reconnaissanceis expected by management to advance early diagnoses of cancer and precancerous conditions, in vivo. SMI is developing non-invasive devices that use its patented technology for improved clinical diagnostics and that operate in conjunction with surgical and/or evaluation procedures in real time. SMIs technology, still in development, is expected to enable early detection and more reliable diagnosis of various diseases, such as Barretts esophagus (a condition caused by chronic acid reflux that can lead to esophageal cancer), lung cancer, and melanoma. SMI believes that development of its technology may significantly improve long-term patient outcomes while substantially reducing overall costs for the healthcare system. The Company was incorporated on February 25, 2004 in Nevada and to date has not generated any revenues. Results of Operations The loss from operations was $(441,202) and $(228,379) for the three month periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The increase in the loss in 2012 compared to 2011 is principally due to the high level of activity in 2012 compared to 2011. The increase was generally attributable to: a $43,089 increase in professional expenses principally attributable to legal costs associated with recent fund raising activity; a $22,617 increase in salary and other compensation expense principally attributable to not having a Chief Operating Officer in 2011; and a $100,377 increase in consulting and outside services principally related to increased activity in product development. Grant income of $25,440 and $33,120 for the three month periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 is pursuant to a phase II SBIR award from the National Cancer Institute shared jointly with Omega Optical, Inc. and is subject to normal fluctuation depending on the level of activity for the period. Interest expense was $65,275 and $31,172 for the three month periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, an increase of $34,103. The increase in interest expense in 2012 is principally due to the $500,000 in convertible notes payable that were placed subsequent to March 31, 2011. The change in value of derivative liability represents the reduction of the fair value of the derivative liability by $33 at March 31, 2012 as determined by the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: expected remaining life of 4.76 years; risk-free interest rate of 0.19%; dividend yield of 0%; and expected volatility of 244%. Liquidity and Capital Resources At March 31, 2012, the Company has an accumulated deficit of $3,697,296 and anticipates that it will continue to incur net losses for the foreseeable future in the development and commercialization of its product line. From inception up through the merger between Cascade and SMI in March 2010, the Company has financed operations solely through short-term loans from a stockholder. In conjunction with the merger between Cascade and SMI additional working capital was obtained through the sale of $850,000 in convertible notes ($787,425 net of expenses) received on March 17, 2010. The Company placed an additional $500,000 in convertible notes during 2011 and $200,000 during the three month period ended March 31, 2012. The proceeds from these notes and grant receipts are expected to permit the Company to fund its anticipated levels of operations through the second quarter of 2012. Absent securing additional working capital, the Company may be unable to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that could result from the outcome of this uncertainty. The Company also faces certain risks and uncertainties which are present in many emerging medical device companies regarding product development, future profitability, ability to obtain future capital, protection of patents and property rights, competition, rapid technological change, government regulations, changing health care marketplace, recruiting and retaining key personnel, and third party manufacturing organizations. Cash flow used in operationsCash utilized by operating activities was $211,389 for the three month period ended March 31, 2012. The use of cash was principally attributable to the net loss for the period of $441,202, reduced by depreciation of $3,774, deferred issuance cost amortization of $14,035, amortization of note discount of $41,569, stock based compensation of $33,158, common shares issued for services of $98,460, a $33 decrease in the valuation of derivative liability, a $8,160 decrease in grant proceeds receivable,  a $12,082 decrease in prepaid  expenses, and a decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $18,608 which did not utilize or generate cash. Cash utilized by operating activities was $17,264 for the three month period ended March 31, 2011. The use of cash was principally attributable to the net loss for the period of $228,379, reduced by depreciation of $3,774, deferred issuance cost amortization of $2,217, amortization of note discount of $27,325, stock based compensation of $32,014, a $2,330 decrease in the valuation of derivative liability, a decrease in grant proceeds receivable, and an decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $9,102 which did not utilize or generate cash. Cash flow used in investing activities Cash used in investing activities was $0 for the three month periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011. Cash flow provided by financing activitiesCash provided by financing activities was $180,000 and $0 for the for the three month periods ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The 2012 balance represents the net proceeds from the issuance of convertible notes. Off-balance Sheet Arrangements We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.  ITEM 3.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK Not applicable. ITEM 4T.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures As of March 31, 2012, the Company carried out an assessment under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive and Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(1) and I 5d-15(1)). Our Chief Financial Officer concluded that due to changes in personnel during the fourth quarter of 2011, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of March 31, 2012. Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The Company maintains internal controls over financial reporting to include those policies and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company's Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's ("SEC's") rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the internal controls over financial reporting, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. This evaluation included an assessment of the design of the Company's internal control over financial reporting and testing of the operational effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Financial Officer concluded as of December 31, 2011 that our internal controls over financial reporting were not effective at the reasonable assurance level due to the material weaknesses discussed below. In light of the material weaknesses described below, we performed additional analysis and other post-closing procedures to ensure that our consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Accordingly, we believe that the consolidated financial statements included in this report fairly present, in all material respects, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.  This Report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Managements report was not subject to attestation by our independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit us to provide only managements report in this Report. Our Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of March 31, 2012 the following material weaknesses existed: we did not maintain a sufficient level of resources within our accounting department. Inherent Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls Management does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control systems are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, no evaluation of internal control over financial reporting can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been or will be detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures. Material Weaknesses and Related Remediation Initiatives Set forth below is a summary of the various significant deficiencies which caused management to conclude that we had the material weaknesses identified above. Through the efforts of management, external consultants, and our Board of Directors, we have developed a specific action plan to remediate the material weaknesses. We expect to implement these various action plans during 2012. If we are able to complete these action plans in a timely manner, we anticipate that all control deficiencies and material weaknesses will be remediated by December 31, 2012. We did not effectively implement comprehensive entity-level internal controls and did not maintain a sufficient level of resources within our accounting department, as discussed below: · Financial Close Process. The Company only prepares financial statements on a quarterly basis which increases the potential that any unusual activities or transactions will not be detected on a timely basis. · Cash Disbursement Process. Our accounting personnel performed all bookkeeping activities including cash disbursements, cash receipts, and monthly bank reconciliations. The lack of segregation of duties in this area increased the potential that any fraud would not be detected on a timely basis. Remediation of Internal Control Deficiencies and Expenditures It is reasonably possible that, if not remediated, one or more of the material weaknesses described above could result in a material misstatement in our reported financial statements that might result in a material misstatement in a future annual or interim period. We are developing specific action plans for each of the above material weaknesses. We are uncertain at this time of the costs to remediate all of the above listed material weaknesses, however, we anticipate the cost to be insignificant. Through these steps, we believe that we are addressing the deficiencies that affected our internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2012. Because the remedial actions may require hiring of additional personnel, and relying extensively on manual review and approval, the successful operation of these controls for at least several quarters may be required before management may be able to conclude that the material weaknesses have been remediated. We intend to continue to evaluate and strengthen our internal control over financial reporting systems. These efforts require significant time and resources. If we are unable to establish adequate internal control over financial reporting systems, we may encounter difficulties in the audit or review of our financial statements by our  independent registered public accounting firm, which in turn may have a material adverse effect on our ability to prepare financial statements in accordance with GAAP and to comply with our Commission reporting obligations. Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting There were no significant changes (including corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies or material weaknesses) in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter March 31, 2012, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.  PART II  OTHER INFORMATION  ITEM 1.   LEGAL PROCEEDINGS  The Company is not a party to any legal proceedings and is not aware of any pending legal proceedings as of the date of this Form 10-Q.  ITEM 1A.   RISK FACTORS Not Applicable  ITEM 2.    UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS Not Applicable  ITEM 3.    DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES Not Applicable  ITEM 4.      SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS Not Applicable  ITEM 5.       OTHER INFORMATION Not Applicable  ITEM 6.         EXHIBITS  NumberExhibit3.1Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the registrant3.2By-laws of the registrant4.1Form of Securities Purchase Agreement (1)4.2Form of Convertible Note (2)10.1Memorandum of Agreement between Cascade Technologies Corp. and Spectral Molecular Imaging, Inc. (3)10.2Amendment No. 1 to the Memorandum of Agreement between Cascade Technologies Corp. and Spectral Molecular Imaging Inc. (4)31.1Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.31.2Certification of Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.32.1Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.32.2Certification of Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(1)Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits filed with the Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 24, 2010(2)Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits filed with the Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 24, 2010(3)Incorporated by reference to the Exhibits filed with our Form 10-K filed with the SEC on December 15, 2009(4)Incorporated by reference to Exhibits filed with our Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on January 8, 2010  SIGNATURES  Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.  CASCADE TECHNOLOGIES CORP.Date:May 10, 2012By:/s/ Gene ScherName:Gene ScherTitle:President/Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer