alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with Igene Biotechnology, Inc. (the "Company")
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I, Edward  J.  Weisberger,  Chief
Financial  Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18  U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
          Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934, as amended; and

          (2)   The  information contained in the  Report  fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:   March 31, 2009     By: /s/ EDWARD J. WEISBERGER
                               __________________________________
                                   EDWARD J. WEISBERGER
                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                   (principal financial officer)

A  signed original of this written statement required by  Section
906  has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company  and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission
or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            5
<LEGEND>

This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
financial statements of News Communications, Inc. as of November 30, 1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
                                                     
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                       DEC-01-1996  
<PERIOD-END>                                         NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                               424,620
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        4,328,799
<ALLOWANCES>                                         849,530
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     4,108,240
<PP&E>                                               953,845
<DEPRECIATION>                                       399,364
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       8,142,879
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                4,059,372
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             82,122
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          200,340
<OTHER-SE>                                           2,050,325
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         8,142,879
<SALES>                                              17,523,952
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     17,523,952
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        19,123,415
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   (200,948)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (1,800,411)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (1,967,657)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (2,954,215)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.36)
        


</TABLE>
### Are agricultural pesticides in surface waters of the central Columbia plateau?

By: R. J. WagnerJ. C. EbbertL.M. Roberts

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/fs24195

#### Links

- More information:  **Publisher Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS  ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Robert M. Brown, Chief Financial Officer of BabyUniverse, Inc. (the “Company”) in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)     theCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)     the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 15th day of May 2006.

|   | */s/ Robert M. Brown*     |
|--------|---------------------------|
|   |                           |
|   | *Robert M. Brown*         |
|   | Chief   Financial Officer |
Editorial Note on Subchapter C of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter C appear by Amdt. 381, 65 FR 64586, Oct. 30, 2000.

Editorial Note on Part 281
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 281 appear at 78 FR 11972, Feb. 21, 2013.

§ 281.1 General purpose and scope. ( a ) These regulations govern the operation of SNAP on Indian reservations either separately or concurrently with the Food distribution program. In order to assure that SNAP is responsive to the needs of Indians on reservations, State agencies are required to consult with Indian tribal organizations about the implementation and operation of SNAP on reservations. Also, under certain specified conditions Indian tribal organizations on reservations can administer SNAP. The Act authorizes the Secretary to pay such amounts for administrative costs as are determined to be necessary for the effective operation of SNAP on Indian reservations.
( b ) The operation of SNAP on Indian reservations is governed by all of the terms and conditions set forth in the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 as amended and the regulations of this chapter.
( c ) Additionally, under no circumstances shall any household participate simultaneously in SNAP and the Food Distribution Program. Policy governing this prohibition is found in § 253.7(e).
[44 FR 35925, June 19, 1979, as amended at 78 FR 11972, Feb. 21, 2013]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

for the Northern District of Florida, Pensacola 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. 

ROBERT V. SMITH, 

 Plaintiffs, 

Vs. Civil Action No.: 3:20CV3678/MCR/EMT 

JAY A. ODOM and OKALOOSA COUNTY, 

BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, 

 Defendants. 

____________________________________________________________/ 

APPEARANCE OF ADDITIONAL COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF, ROBERT V. SMITH

To: Clerk of the Court and All Parties of Record 

 I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as 

additional counsel for Plaintiff, Robert V. Smith. 

 Dated this 10th day of December, 2020. 

 /s/ Elizabeth C. Billhimer 

 ELIZABETH C. BILLHIMER 

 Florida Bar No. 121986 

 CLARK PARTINGTON

 4100 Legendary Drive, Suite 200 

 Destin, Florida 32541 

 Telephone: (850) 650-3304 

 Facsimile: (850) 650-3305 

 ebillhimer@clarkpartington.com 

 wlemon@clarkpartington.com 

Case 3:20-cv-03678-MCR-EMT Document 11 Filed 12/10/20 Page 1 of 1
#### Ruth Howard, Respondent, v Robert Howard, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs, on the memorandum at Erie County Court, Dworakowski, J. (Appeal from order of Erie County Court—vacate subpoenas.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Cardamone, Schnepp, Doerr and Witmer, JJ.
#### § 29.3023 Foreign matter.

Any extraneous substance or material such as stalks, suckers, straw, strings, rubber bands, et cetera. Abnormal amounts of dirt or sand also are included. (See Rule 23.)

[24 FR 8771, Oct. 29, 1959. Redesignated at 49 FR 16757, Apr. 20, 1984]
2006-0499.

#### Klein v. Leis.

In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Thomas Klein. Sua sponte, cause dismissed.

*1421Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32
                                                       ----------

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

  In  connection  with the Annual Report of Diversified  Historic
Investors III on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003
as  filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Spencer Wertheimer,  President  and
Treasurer of the Company's managing partner, EPK, Inc.,  certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  Section 1350, as  adopted  pursuant  to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all  material  respects, the financial condition and  results  of
operations of the Company.



Date: June 19, 2007               By:   /s/ Spencer Wertheimer
      -------------                     ----------------------
                                Name:   Spencer Wertheimer
                               Title:   President
                                        (principal executive
                                         officer) of the
                                         registrant's
                                         managing partner,
                                         EPK, Inc.


<PAGE>
#### National Equipment Rental, Ltd., Respondent, v Trans-Continental Leasing Corporation et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

In an action to recover money due and payable under an installment contract, promissory note and guarantees, the corporate defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated June 30, 1977, which struck their answer and counterclaim and granted judgment in plaintiff’s favor against them. Appeal dismissed, with $50 costs and disbursements. No appeal lies from an ex parte order (see *Matter of City of New York v Every,*231 App Div 576, 580). Appellants may, if they be so advised, move at Special Term, upon notice to plaintiff, to vacate the order and the judgment entered thereon *(Matter of City of New York v Every, supra).*Damiani, J. P., Gulotta, Cohalan and Margett, JJ., concur.
#### Scarburgh Company, Inc., Appellant, v. Employers’ Surplus Lines Insurance Company et al., Respondents. American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. American Express Company, Third-Party Defendant. Employers’ Surplus Lines Insurance Company, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, v. American Express Company, Third-Party Defendant.

Order entered November 2, 1966 precluding plaintiff with respect to the bill of particulars and granting other relief with respect to the demand, unanimously affirmed, with $75 costs and disbursements to defendants-respondents. (See *Baumgarten*v. *Lear,*27 A D 2d 932.) Concur — Stevens, J. P., Steuer, Capozzoli and Rabin, JJ.
#### § 29.1016 Excessively scorched.

As applied to flue-cured tobacco, the combination symbol “KK” when used as the third factor of a grademark denotes that a lot contains over 50 percent of unripe tobacco.

[51 FR 25027, July 10, 1986]
#### § 160.63 When a certificate may not be issued.

No certificate shall be issued for naval stores unless the naval stores have been packed, sampled, marked, and identified as required by the provisions in this part, and otherwise conform with the act and such provisions. The results of the examination of such naval stores or anything offered as such may be covered by a written report, which in no case shall be construed as a certificate.
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-13-0139 SAT Date: 12/11/2012

Print Date: 8/4/2014

Related cases :

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1 2

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 2 11

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: Yes
Routes of exposure : Health: N o exposures needed Ecotox: All releases to water Fate: ; Keywords : Keywords: AQUATOX-A,C Summary of Assessment :
Fate : Fate Summary: P-13-0139 FATE: Liquid with MP < 25 C (E) S = Disp. VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E) BP > 400 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) POTW removal (%) = 50-90 via sorption and possible partial biodeg Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk-mo Sorption to soils/sediments = strongPBT Potential: P2B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl - slow

Health : Health Summary: Absorption of the low molecular weight fraction is poor all routes based on physical/chemical properties. N o significant health concerns. Low concern.

Ecotox : Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 68 daphnid 48-h LC50 43 green algal 96-h EC50 5.5 fish

_ chronic value 13.6 daphnid

_ chronic value 8.6
algal

_ chronic value 1.9
Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for Nonionic ; p H7; liquid with unknown mp (P); effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and nominal concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 190

SARs N onionic SAR Class N onionic Ecotox Category N onionic
Ecotox Factors Comments:
SAT Chair: Becky Jones
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

TERRELL L. POWELL,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:03-cv-00059-MP

ROBERT K. MATHIS,

Defendant.

___________________________/

O R D E R 

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 25, Plaintiff’s “Motion to State a Claim.” On

December 18, 2003, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s case without prejudice for failure to state a

claim. Now, more than five years later, Plaintiff has filed the instant motion requesting that the

Court reinstate his claim or, in the alternative, permit him to file an untimely appeal of the

Court’s 2003 order. The Court does not have the authority to grant either request. Therefore, the

motion is DENIED. To the extent Plaintiff’s motion can be construed as a motion for

reconsideration of the Court’s 2003 order, the motion is also DENIED. If Plaintiff wishes to

proceed with a claim against Defendant, then Plaintiff must file a new complaint. Plaintiff’s

complaint has been dismissed, the time for filing appeals has long passed, and this case is closed.

DONE AND ORDERED this 2nd day of April, 2009

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:03-cv-00059-MP Document 26 Filed 04/02/09 Page 1 of 1
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

1 The district court had jurisdiction over the case, as do

we, pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The defendants removed

this case to federal court alleging that Holbrook, a Mississippi

resident, was fraudulently joined to defeat diversity

jurisdiction. Touchberry did not contest removal or the federal

court’s jurisdiction.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-60779

Summary Calendar

 

DOROTHY L. TOUCHBERRY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

COYOTE MISSISSIPPI MALL, LLC, Etc., ET AL.

Defendants,

COYOTE MISSISSIPPI MALL, LLC, ET AL. d/b/a Metrocenter Mall; NINA

HOLBROOK,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

(Jackson Division)

(3:00-cv-109)

--------------------

May 13, 2002

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiff-Appellant Dorothy L. Touchberry appeals the grant of

summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees Coyote

Mississippi Mall, LLC d/b/a Metrocenter Mall (“Coyote”) and Nina

Holbrook, the general manager of Metrocenter Mall.1 Our de novo
2 We have also considered and rejected Touchberry’s argument

on appeal, casting the destruction of the surveillance camera

tape as spoliation of evidence, and insisting that she was

entitled to a presumption that the evidence would have been

unfavorable to Coyote’s case. We have previously stated that the

adverse inference to be drawn from destruction of evidence is

predicated on bad conduct of the defendant, Vick v. Texas

Employment Commission, 514 F.2d 734, 737 (5th Cir. 1975), and

have declined to employ the adverse presumption when “[t]here was

indication ... that the records were destroyed under routine

procedures without bad faith.” Id. Touchberry offers no

evidence to support her assertion that the surveillance tape was

destroyed with fraudulent intent, rather than pursuant to the

security company’s standard procedure of erasing and recycling

tapes that showed nothing noteworthy after they had been held for

seven days. We therefore refuse to apply the presumption in the

instant case. Accord Washington v. State, 478 So.2d 1028, 1032

(Miss. 1985) (explaining that the negative presumption does not

arise “where the destruction was a matter of routine with no

fraudulent intent”).

2

review of the district court’s thorough opinion satisfies us that

the court correctly concluded that Touchberry failed to create a

genuine issue of material fact as to two essential elements of her

negligence claim against Coyote and Holbrook, to wit: breach of a

duty and proximate causation.2 For the reasons given by the

district court, whose opinion we incorporate by reference, we

affirm that court’s grant of Appellees’ motion for summary judgment

dismissing Touchberry’s action.

AFFIRMED.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsFlow structure generated by perpendicular blade vortex interaction and implications for helicopter noise predictionsActivities carried out in support of research on flow structure generated by perpendicular blade vortex interaction and implications for helicopter noise prediction are summarized. Progress in the following areas is described: (1) construction of 8 inch-chord NACA 0012 full-span blade; (2) Acquisition of two full-span blades; (3) preparation for hot wire measurements; (4) related work on a modified Betz's theory; and (5) work related to helicopter noise prediction. In addition, a list of publications based on the results of prior experimentation is presented.Document ID19940029701Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsDevenport, William J.*(Virginia Polytechnic Inst. Blacksburg, VA, United States)*Glegg, Stewart A. L.*(Virginia Polytechnic Inst. Blacksburg, VA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1994Subject CategoryAerodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:195824NASA-CR-195824Accession Number94N34207Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG1-1539Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19940029701.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: English Learners with Disabilities      

# Resource: English Learners with Disabilities

This infographic (PDF, 4 pages) presents data on the percentage of public school students ages 5–21 who are English learners with disabilities (ELSWD) in need of special education and related services. Recommendations for serving and supporting ELSWDs are provided. **Learn more** (PDF, 4 pages).