alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2059 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to ensure the issuance of regulations 

applicable to the Coast Guard regarding consideration of a request for 

a permanent change of station or unit transfer submitted by a member 

of the Coast Guard who is the victim of a sexual assault. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 20, 2013 

Ms. TSONGAS (for herself, Mr. TURNER, Mr. KEATING, Ms. BROWN of Florida, Ms. KUSTER, Ms. SLAUGHTER, Mr. RUNYAN, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. 

MCGOVERN, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. CONYERS, Ms. PINGREE of Maine, Mr. 

JOHNSON of Ohio, and Ms. JACKSON LEE) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to ensure the 

issuance of regulations applicable to the Coast Guard 

regarding consideration of a request for a permanent 

change of station or unit transfer submitted by a member 

of the Coast Guard who is the victim of a sexual assault. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Coast Guard STRONG 

5 Act’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2059 IH

1 SEC. 2. ISSUANCE OF REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO THE 

2 COAST GUARD REGARDING CONSIDERATION 

3 OF REQUEST FOR PERMANENT CHANGE OF 

4 STATION OR UNIT TRANSFER BY VICTIM OF 

5 SEXUAL ASSAULT. 

6 Section 673(b) of title 10, United States Code, is 

7 amended by striking ‘‘The Secretaries of the military de8 partments’’ and inserting ‘‘The Secretary concerned’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
§ 201.58d Fungal endophyte test. A fungal endophyte test may be used to determine the amount of fungal endophyte (*Acremonium* spp.) in certain grasses. ( a ) Method of preparation of aniline blue stain for use in testing grass seed and plant material for the presence of fungal endophyte: ( 1 ) Prepare a 1 percent aqueous aniline blue solution by dissolving 1 gram aniline blue in 100 ml distilled water.
( 2 ) Prepare the endophyte staining solution of one part of 1 percent aniline blue solution with 2 parts of 85 percent lactic acid (C3 H6 O3).
( 3 ) Use stain as-is or dilute with water if staining is too dark.
( b ) Procedure for determining levels of fungal endophyte in grass seed: ( 1 ) Take a sub-sample of seed (1 gram is sufficient) from the pure seed portion of the kind under consideration.
( 2 ) Digest seed at room temperature for 12-16 hours in a 5 percent sodium hydroxide (NaOH) solution or other temperature/time combination resulting in adequate seed softening.
( 3 ) Rinse thoroughly in running tap water.
( 4 ) De-glume seeds and place on a microscope slide in a drop of endophyte staining solution. Slightly crush the seeds. Use caution to prevent carryover hyphae of fungal endophyte from one seed to another.
( 5 ) Place coverglass on seed and apply gentle pressure.
( 6 ) Examine with compound microscope at 100-400x magnification, scoring a seed as positive if any identifiable hyphae are present.
( 7 ) Various sample sizes may be used for this test. Precision changes with sample size; therefore, the test results must include the sample size tested.
( c ) Procedure for determining levels of fungal endophyte in seedlings from seed samples suspected to contain fungal endophyte: ( 1 ) Select seeds at random and germinate.
( 2 ) Examine seedlings from the sample germinated after growing for a minimum of 48 days.
( 3 ) Remove the outermost sheath from the seedling. Tissue should have no obvious discoloration from saprophytes and should have as little chlorophyll as possible.
( 4 ) Isolate a longitudinal section of leaf sheath approximately 3-5 mm in width.
( 5 ) Place the section on a microscope slide with the epidermis side down.
( 6 ) Stain immediately with the endophyte staining solution as prepared in paragraph (a) (2) and (3) of this section. Allow dye to remain at least 15 seconds but no more than one minute.
( 7 ) Blot off the excess dye with tissue paper. Sections should remain on the slide, but may adhere to the tissue paper; if so, remove and place in proper position on the slide.
( 8 ) Place a coverglass on the sections and flood with water.
( 9 ) Proceed with evaluation as described in paragraph (b) (6) and (7) of this section.
[59 FR 64515, Dec. 14, 1994]
Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3705 Filed 03/23/23 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3705 Filed 03/23/23 Page 2 of 2
#### Paula Greenberg, Respondent, v. Martin Greenberg, Appellant.

Order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated November 17, 1966, modified, on the law and the facts, by (1) granting defendant’s motion to the extent of amending the judgment of divorce so that the direction for support payments shall be only for plaintiff’s support and (2) reducing the amount of the support payments from $75 a week to $50 a week. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. Findings of fact below which are inconsistent herewith are reversed and new findings are made as indicated herein. Defendant’s obligation to support his child, absent exceptional circumstances, terminated when the child attained his majority *(Sloan*v. *Sloan,*286 App. Div. 1102). The fact that the son is pursuing post-graduate work is not an unusual circumstance *(Halsted*v. *Halsted,*228 App. Div. 298). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Dockets DOT-OST-2010-0181 and DOT-OST-2010-0215]

# AGENCY:

Department of Transportation, Office of the Secretary.

# ACTION:

Notice of Order to Show Cause (Order 2010-11-05).

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Transportation is directing all interested persons to show cause why it should not issue an order finding National Air Cargo Group, Inc. d/b/a National Airlines fit, willing, and able, and awarding it certificates of public convenience and necessity to engage in interstate and foreign charter air transportation of persons, property, and mail.

# DATES:

Persons wishing to file objections should do so no later than November 19, 2010.

      ( print page 69734)    

# ADDRESSES:

Objections and answers to objections should be filed in Dockets DOT-OST-2010-0181 and DOT-OST-2010-0215 and addressed to U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, (M-30, Room W12-140), 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590, and should be served upon the parties listed in Attachment A to the order.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Damon D. Walker, Air Carrier Fitness Division (X-56, Room W86-465), U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, (202) 366-7785.

Dated: November 5, 2010.

Susan L. Kurland,

Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2010-28620 Filed 11-12-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the quarterly report of New Design Cabinets, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kenneth P. Laurent, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer and as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Kenneth P. Laurent

Kenneth P. Laurent

Chief Executive Officer

August 14, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements included in the Company's September 30, 1999 Form 10-K
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          12,926
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  426,780
<ALLOWANCES>                                   114,792
<INVENTORY>                                     32,038
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               425,472
<PP&E>                                       1,142,456
<DEPRECIATION>                                 229,967
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,517,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          175,221
<BONDS>                                        401,522
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,534
<OTHER-SE>                                     887,989
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,517,330
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,355,707
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  876,232
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                94,424
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               130,013
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,385
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                246,653
<INCOME-TAX>                                    96,808
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            149,845
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   149,845
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .59


</TABLE>
Exhibit
10.47


 


2005
Named Executive Officer Base Compensation


and
Short-Term Incentive Targets


 


2005 Base Salary.  The Compensation Committee approved base
salaries of the named executive officers for 2005 as follows:  M. Michele Burns, Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Chief Restructuring Officer—$600,000; Curtis A.
Morgan, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer—$500,000; Douglas
L. Miller, Senior Vice President and General Counsel—$380,000; Vance N. Booker,
Senior Vice President, Administration—$295,000; and L. Alderman Warnock, Senior
Vice President, Governmental and Regulatory Affairs—$250,000.  The Compensation Committee did not take any
action with respect to the salary of S. Marce Fuller, its Chief Executive
Officer.


 


2005 Short-term Incentive
Targets.  In addition, the Committee
approved the following short-term incentive target bonus percentages for the
named executive officers for 2005 under the short term incentive program,
expressed as a percentage of base salary: 
Ms. Burns—75%; Mr. Morgan—75%; Mr. Miller—55%; Mr. Booker—55%; Mr.
Warnock—55%.
#### § 205.691 Severability.

If any provision of any subpart is declared invalid or the applicability thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the validity of the remainder of any subpart or the applicability thereof to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby.

[88 FR 75446, Nov. 6, 2023; 88 FR 86259, Dec. 13, 2023; 88 FR 89539, Dec. 28, 2023]
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1435.601 Sugar surplus determination and public announcement. ( a ) CCC will estimate by September 1 the quantity of sugar that will be made available for purchase and sale under FFP for the following crop year.
( b ) Not later than January 1, April 1, and July 1 of the fiscal year, CCC will re-estimate the quantity of sugar that will be made available for purchase and sale under the FFP for the crop year.
( c ) CCC will announce by press release the estimates in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, which will reflect CCC's forecast of sugar likely to be forfeited to CCC and any uncertainty surrounding that forecast.
#### Nathaniel Warren, Respondent, v. Merchants Mutual Insurance Company, Appellant.

Order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated August 31, 1966, reversed, without costs, and plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment denied, without costs. Oral notice of the accident to the insurance broker who obtained the policy under the Assigned Risk Plan was not written notice -to the insurer or to its authorized agent within the meaning of the statute and the policy provisions *(Cortes*v. *Hartford Acc. & Ind. Co.,*14 Misc 2d 1062; *Allen*v. *German Amer. Ins. Co.,*123 N. Y. 6, 15; *Bazar*v. *Great Amer. Ind. Co.,*306 N. Y. 481; *Manufacturers Cas. Ins. Co.*v. *Hughes,*229 Ark. 503; *Iowa Nat. Mut. Ins. Co.*v. *Richards,*229 F. 2d 210). The record is inadequate to determine whether, as a matter of law, the notice given to the defendant was given as soon as it was reasonably possible to give the notice (cf. *Lauritano*v. *American Fid. Fire Ins. Co.,*3 A D 2d 564, affd. 4 N Y 2d 1028; *Appell*v. *Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.,*22 A D 2d 906, affd. 17 N Y 2d 519; *Cohen*v. *Atlantic Nat. Ins. Co.,*24 A D 2d 896; *Allstate Ins. Co.*v. *Manger,*30 Misc 2d 326). Moreover, the facts as to defendant’s possible waiver of the untimeliness of the notice should be explored on a trial. Ro issue has been raised as to whether the insured should have been joined as a party. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
2006-0370.

#### State v. Palmer.

Portage App. No. 2004-P-0106, 2005-Ohio-6710. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 3 of the court of appeals’ Judgment Entry filed February 13, 2006:

“Whether a defendant’s failure to timely respond to the State’s request for reciprocal discovery is a period of delay occasioned by the ’neglect’ or ’improper act’ of the defendant that tolls the speedy trial time pursuant to R.C. 2945.72(D), even in the absence of a Crim.R. 16 demand for discovery.”

*1404Resnick and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.

The conflict case is *State v. Larsen*(Mar. 22, 1995), Medina App. No. 2363-M, 1995 WL 125577.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2006-0022, *State v. Palmer,*Portage App. No. 2004-P-0106, 2005-Ohio-6710.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OFINDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

Wehereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statementson Form S-3 (No.’s 33-13793 and 33-34301) andForm S-8 (No.’s 33-18932, 33-29291, 33-35091, 33-37696,33-37697, 33-37698, 33-55596, 33-73040, 333-15113,333-88295, 333-55556, 33-103677, and 333-134977) ofCandela Corporation and subsidiaries of our reports dated September 12,2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements and schedule and theeffectiveness of Candela Corporation and subsidiaries  internal controls over financial reportingwhich appears in this Form 10-K.
|                         |   | /s/  BDO SEIDMAN, LLP |   |
|-------------------------|--------|-----------------------|--------|
| Boston, Massachusetts   |   |                  |
| September 12, 2007 |   |                  |

 

----
EXHIBIT
3.6




FIRST
AMENDMENT


TO
THE


THIRD
AMENDED AND RESTATED LIMITED


LIABILITY
COMPANY AGREEMENT


OF


EPE
HOLDINGS, LLC





This First Amendment dated November 6,
2008 to the Third Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement (this
“Amendment”) of EPE Holdings, LLC (“EPE GP”), dated November 7, 2007, is
executed by Dan Duncan LLC (“DDLLC”).  Capitalized terms used but not
defined in this Amendment shall have the meaning set forth in the Limited
Liability Company Agreement of EPE GP dated November 7, 2007 (the “LLC
Agreement”).





RECITALS





WHEREAS, DDLLC is the sole member of
EPE GP;





WHEREAS, EPE GP owns a 0.01% general
partnership interest in Enterprise GP Holdings L.P., a Delaware limited
partnership (“EPE LP”), and is the sole general partner of EPE LP;





WHEREAS, the Company has determined
that it is advisable to amend the LLC Agreement.





NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
agreements and obligations set forth herein and for other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged and
intending to be legally bound, DDLLC hereby agrees as follows:





AGREEMENT





1.  Section
6.06(i) of the LLC Agreement shall be deleted and restated in its entirety as
follows:





(i) No amendment,
modification or repeal of this Section 6.06 or any provision hereof shall
in any manner terminate, reduce or impair either the right of any past, present
or future Indemnitee to receive indemnification (including expense advancement
as provided by Section 6.06(b)) from the Company or the obligation of the
Company to indemnify, or advance the expenses of, any such Indemnitee under and
in accordance with the provisions of this Section 6.06 as in effect
immediately prior to such amendment, modification or repeal with respect to
claims arising from or relating to matters occurring, in whole or in part, prior
to such amendment, modification or repeal, regardless of when such claims may
arise or be asserted, and provided such Person became an Indemnitee hereunder
prior to such amendment, modification or repeal.










2. Except as
otherwise expressly provided by this Amendment, all of the terms, conditions and
provisions of the LLC Agreement shall remain the same. This Amendment shall be
governed by and construed under the laws of the State of Delaware as applied to
agreements entered into solely between residents of, and to be performed
entirely within, such state.








[Signature Page
Follows]













IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Amendment to Limited
Liability Company Agreement as of November 6, 2008.







DAN
      DUNCAN LLC (Sole
      Member of EPE Holdings, LLC)




By:     /s/ W. Randall
      Fowler Name:  W.
      Randall Fowler


Title:   
      Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
  Officer
#### § 2003.2 General.

The Rural Development mission area of the Department of Agriculture was established as a result of the Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994, Title II of Pub.L. 103-354. Rural Development's basic organization consists of Headquarters in Washington, D.C. and 47 State Offices. Headquarters maintains overall planning, coordination, and control of Rural Development agency programs. Administrators head RHS, RBS, and RUS under the direction of the Under Secretary for Rural Development. State Directors head the State Offices and are directly responsible to the Under Secretary for the execution of all Rural Development agency programs within the boundaries of their states.
§ 15f.18 May I depose potential witnesses? ( a ) A party may request an order from the ALJ to take the testimony of any person by deposition upon oral examination or written interrogatories before any officer authorized to administer oaths at the place of examination, for use as evidence. The application for the order must specify the reason and need for taking testimony by deposition.
( b ) The time, place, and manner of taking depositions will be as mutually agreed by the parties, or failing agreement, by order of the ALJ.
( c ) No testimony taken by depositions will be considered as part of the evidence in the hearing until such testimony is offered and received in evidence at the hearing, and ordinarily it will not be received into evidence if the deponent is present and can testify at the hearing. However, when the deponent is present and can testify, the deposition may be used to contradict or impeach the testimony of the deponent given at the hearing. Where you have requested a final determination by the ALJ based on the written record without a hearing, the ALJ, in his or her discretion, may receive depositions to supplement the record.
( d ) Each party will bear its own expenses associated with the taking of any deposition.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 218 (Friday, November 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 69467]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28522]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Manufacturer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration

    By Notice dated June 17, 2010, and published in the Federal 
Register on June 28, 2010, (75 FR 36683), Wildlife Laboratories, Inc., 
1401 Duff Drive, Suite 400, Fort Collins, Colorado 80524, made 
application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to 
be registered as a bulk manufacturer of Carfentanil (9743), a basic 
class of controlled substance listed in schedule II.
    The company will manufacture the above listed controlled substance 
for sale to veterinary pharmacies, zoos, and for other animal and 
wildlife applications.
    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered 
the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of 
Wildlife Laboratories, Inc. to manufacture the listed basic class of 
controlled substance is consistent with the public interest at this 
time. DEA has investigated Wildlife Laboratories, Inc. to ensure that 
the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The 
investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's 
physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance 
with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and 
history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and in accordance 
with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as 
a bulk manufacturer of the basic class of controlled substance listed.

    Dated: November 1, 2010.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
[FR Doc. 2010-28522 Filed 11-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P