alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1780.83 Bond transcript documents. Any questions relating to Agency requirements should be discussed with Agency representatives. Bond counsel or local counsel, as appropriate, must furnish at least two complete sets of the following to the applicant, who will furnish one complete set to the Agency: ( a ) Copies of all organizational documents;
( b ) Copies of general incumbency certificate;
( c ) Certified copies of minutes or excerpts from all meetings of the governing body at which action was taken in connection with the authorizing and issuing of the bonds;
( d ) Certified copies of documents evidencing that the applicant has complied fully with all statutory requirements incident to calling and holding a favorable bond election, if one is necessary;
( e ) Certified copies of the resolutions, ordinances, or other documents such as the bond authorizing resolutions or ordinances and any resolution establishing rates and regulating use of facility, if such documents are not included in the minutes furnished;
( f ) Copies of the official Notice of Sale and the affidavit of publication of the Notice of Sale when State statute requires a public sale;
( g ) Specimen bond, with any attached coupons;
( h ) Attorney's no-litigation certificate;
( i ) Certified copies of resolutions or other documents pertaining to the bond award;
( j ) Any additional or supporting documents required by bond counsel;
( k ) For loans involving multiple advances of Agency loan funds, a preliminary approving opinion of bond counsel (or local counsel if no bond counsel is involved) if a final unqualified opinion cannot be obtained until all funds are advanced. The preliminary opinion for the entire issue shall be delivered at or before the time of the first advance of funds. It will state that the applicant has the legal authority to issue the bonds, construct, operate and maintain the facility, and repay the loan, subject only to changes occurring during the advance of funds, such as litigation resulting from the failure to advance loan funds, and receipt of closing certificates;
( l ) Final unqualified approving opinion of bond counsel, (and preliminary approving opinion, if required) or local counsel if no bond counsel is involved, including an opinion as to whether interest on bonds will be exempt from Federal and State income taxes. With approval of the State program official, a final opinion may be qualified to the extent that litigation is pending relating to Indian claims that may affect title to land or validity of the obligation. It is permissible for such opinion to contain language referring to the last sentence of section 306 (a)(1) or to section 309A (h) of the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act (7 U.S.C. 1926 (a)(1) or 1929a (h)).
#### Augusta Anderson, appellee, v. Reliance Elevator Company and Victor R. Anderson, defendants. Reliance Elevator Company, appellant.

Gen. No. 37,310.

Opinion filed October 16, 1934.

Rehearing denied and opinion slightly modified October 29, 1934.

John A. Bloomingston, for appellant. John E. Owens, for appellee; Thomas L. Owens and Clyde C. Fisher, of counsel.

Mr. Presiding Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

CHRISTINE K. BRYANT, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D16-4159

) 2D17-328

S&J SPORTS, INC. d/b/a PLAY IT AGAIN )

SPORTS, a Florida Corporation, FORTIN ) CONSOLIDATED

HOLDINGS, INC., a Florida Corporation, )

and STAMINA PRODUCTS, INC., a )

Foreign Corporation, )

)

Appellees. )

)

Opinion filed July 25, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk

County; Larry Helms, Judge.

Christine K. Bryant, pro se.

Robert Aranda of Valenti, Campbell, Trohn, 

Tamayo & Aranda, P.A., Lakeland, for 

Appellees S&J Sports, Inc. d/b/a Play It 

Again Sports and Fortin Holdings, Inc. 

No appearance for remaining Appellee. 

 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, SALARIO, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT 12.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-15(e) OR 15d-15(e) OF THE
      SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Tam Cheuk Ho, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of China Natural Resources,
     Inc. (the "Registrant");

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the year covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the Registrant as of, and for, the years presented in this report;

4.   The Registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the year in which this report is being
     prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures and presented in this report our conclusion about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the year covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's fourth
     fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
     materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial
     reporting; and;

5.   The Registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's board
     of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
     likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process,
     summarize and report financial information; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting.

Date:  April 30, 2007

/s/ Tam Cheuk Ho
Chief Financial Officer
§ 1222.82 Suspension or termination. ( a ) The Secretary shall suspend or terminate this part or subpart or a provision thereof, if the Secretary finds that this part or subpart or a provision thereof obstructs or does not tend to effectuate the purposes of the Act, or if the Secretary determines that this subpart or a provision thereof is not favored by persons voting in a referendum conducted pursuant to the Act.
( b ) The Secretary shall suspend or terminate this subpart at the end of the fiscal year whenever the Secretary determines that its suspension or termination is favored by a majority of manufacturers and importers voting in the referendum who also represent a majority of the volume represented in the referendum who, during a representative period determined by the Secretary, have been engaged in the manufacturing or importation of paper and paper-based packaging.
( c ) If, as a result of a referendum the Secretary determines that this subpart is not approved, the Secretary shall: ( 1 ) Not later than one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days after making the determination, suspend or terminate, as the case may be, the collection of assessments under this subpart.
( 2 ) As soon as practical, suspend or terminate, as the case may be, activities under this subpart in an orderly manner.
EXHIBIT 32.2

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ruths Chris Steak
House, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 24, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas J. Pennison, Jr., Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

November 2, 2006



/s/ Thomas J. Pennison, Jr.Thomas J. Pennison, Jr.Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Ruths Chris Steak House, Inc. and will be retained by
Ruths Chris Steak House, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter C of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter C appear by Amdt. 381, 65 FR 64586, Oct. 30, 2000.

###### Editorial Note on Part 273

#### Editorial Notes:

1. OMB control numbers relating to this part 273 are contained in § 271.8.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 273 appear at 84 FR 15093, Apr. 15, 2019.

#### § 273.19 [Reserved]
#### §§ 205.274-205.289 [Reserved]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:95CR3093/LAC/MD

CHARLES J. SPIGNER

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on January 2, 2008

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (Docs 156 and 167) 

Filed byDefendant Pro Se on Doc.# 173

RESPONSES:

on Doc.#

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

 Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/ Katherine V. Goodman

Deputy Clerk: Katherine V. Goodman

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 7th day of

January, 2008, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) See docs. 166 & 167. 

 s/L.A. Collier

Lacey A. Collier

Senior United States District Judge

Case 3:95-cr-03093-LC-CJK Document 177 Filed 01/07/08 Page 1 of 1
#### § 29.1118 Rule 12.

In determining the grade of a lot of tobacco, the lot as a whole shall be considered. Minor irregularities which do not affect over one percent of the tobacco shall be overlooked.
<PAGE>



                                                                      Exhibit 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Andover Togs, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 33-
33963) on Form S-8 of Andover Togs, Inc. of our report dated January 30, 1998,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Andover Togs, Inc. and
Subsidiaries as of November 30, 1997 and 1996, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows and the related
Schedule II for the years then ended, which report appears in the November 30,
1997 annual report on Form 10-K of Andover Togs, Inc.

                                          /s/ MAHONEY COHEN & COMPANY, CPA, P.C.

New York, New York
January 30, 1998




<PAGE>
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-51074

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Jesus Guadalupe Amparano-Torres, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 4:21-CR-548-1

Before Jolly, Willett, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Jesus Guadalupe Amparano-Torres appeals the 30-month sentence 

imposed after his guilty plea conviction for illegal reentry after having 

previously been deported, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(1). He 

contends, for the first time on appeal, that it violates the Constitution to treat 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 21, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-51074 Document: 00516365031 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2022
No. 21-51074

2

a prior conviction that increases the statutory maximum under § 1326(b) as a 

sentencing factor, rather than as an element of the offense. 

Amparano-Torres concedes that this issue is foreclosed by 

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to 

preserve the issue for future review. In addition, Amparano-Torres has filed 

an unopposed motion for summary disposition. 

As Amparano-Torres concedes, the sole issue raised on appeal is 

foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres. See United States v. Pervis, 937 F.3d 546, 

553-54 (5th Cir. 2019); United States v. Wallace, 759 F.3d 486, 497 (5th Cir. 

2014). Because his position “is clearly right as a matter of law so that there

can be no substantial question as to the outcome of the case,” Groendyke 

Transp., Inc. v. Davis, 406 F.2d 1158, 1162 (5th Cir. 1969), summary 

disposition is proper. Accordingly, Amparano-Torres’s motion for summary 

disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is 

AFFIRMED.

Case: 21-51074 Document: 00516365031 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/21/2022
§ 28.105 Practical forms of cotton standards. ( a ) Practical forms of the cotton standards of the United States prepared in physical form, each certified under the seal of the U.S. Department of Agriculture and under the signature of the Administrator, thereto affixed by the Administrator or by some other official or employee of the Department duly authorized by the Administrator, and in the case of the standards for grade accompanied by photographs representing the cotton in such practical forms on the date of certification, are available for sale to any person requesting the same, subject to the other conditions of this section.
( b ) Each application for practical forms of the cotton standards shall be upon an application form furnished by the Division, shall be signed by the applicant, and shall incorporate the following conditions: ( 1 ) That no practical form of any of the cotton standards for the grade of American Upland cotton shall be considered or used as representing such standards after the date of its cancellation in accordance with this section or in any event after the expiration of 12 months following the date of its certification: Provided, That sets of practical forms stored, protected, and preserved in accordance with certain agreements for the adoption of universal standards may be used for such periods as may be prescribed in such agreements.
( 2 ) That said practical forms and the photographs accompanying them shall be subject to inspection on any business day, between the hours of 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., by the Administrator or by an officer or agent of the Department authorized by the Administrator for that purpose.
( 3 ) That the signature of the Administrator certifying to any practical form, or any photograph of said practical form accompanying the same, or both, may be cancelled if it be found, upon such inspection, either that copy of said forms for any reason misrepresents the cotton standards or that any such photographs have been altered or mutilated.
[22 FR 10930, Dec. 28, 1975, as amended at 48 FR 37003, Aug. 16, 1983; 52 FR 30883, Aug. 18, 1987]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. Case No. 3:97cr51/LAC

SHERYL ANN LONERGAN

____________________________/

AMENDED ORDER TERMINATING CONDITIONAL RELEASE

On December 23, 1997, Sheryl Ann Lonergan was sentenced to a period

of conditional release by this Court. On July 22, 2009, a motion to determine

whether Ms. Lonergan’s conditional release could be terminated or modified

was filed by defense counsel, Assistant Federal Public Defender Thomas

Keith. In consideration of this motion, the Court reviewed the

recommendation of the United States Probation Office with input from the

United States Attorney’s Office. Accordingly, it has been determined that

Sheryl Ann Lonergan has complied with the rules and regulations of

conditional release and is no longer in need of supervision. Therefore, it is

ordered that she be discharged from conditional release.

DONE AND ORDERED this 20 day of August, 2009.

th

s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
PUBLIC LAW 109–206—MAR. 23, 2006 120 STAT. 315

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1691:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:

Vol. 151 (2005): Nov. 2, considered and passed House.

Vol. 152 (2006): Mar. 13, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–206

109th Congress

An Act

To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic in Appleton,

Wisconsin, as the ‘‘John H. Bradley Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient

Clinic’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic in

Appleton, Wisconsin, shall after the date of the enactment of this

Act be known and designated as the ‘‘John H. Bradley Department

of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in any law, regulation, map, document, record,

or other paper of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘John H.

Bradley Department of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic’’.

Approved March 23, 2006.

Mar. 23, 2006

[H.R. 1691]
§ 28.522 Explanatory terms. ( a ) The term preparation is used to describe the degree of smoothness or roughness of the ginned lint. Normal preparation for any color grade of American Pima cotton for which there is a physical color standard shall be that found in the physical color standard. If the preparation is other than normal, it shall be entered on the classification record.
( b ) Explanatory terms considered necessary to adequately describe the presence of preparation, spindle twist, and extraneous matter such as bark, grass, seed coat fragments, oil, etc. in the sample, shall be part of the classification record.
[65 FR 36601, June 9, 2000]
**EXHIBIT 99.906CERTIFICATION**

**Pursuant to Section 906**

**of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**Registrant: Nicholas Fund, Inc.**

**Form: N-CSR Semiannual Report dated March31, 2019**

** **

I, David O. Nicholas, hereby certify thatto the best of my knowledge: 

1. The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and 

2. The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company. 

| Date:  | 05/30/2019                                             |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | /s/ David O. Nicholas                                  |   |
|   | David O. Nicholas, President (Chief Executive Officer) |   |

 

I, Jennifer R. Kloehn, hereby certify thatto the best of my knowledge: 

1. The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and 

2. The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company. 

| Date:  | 05/30/2019                                              |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | /s/ Jennifer R. Kloehn                                  |   |
|   | Jennifer R. Kloehn, Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer) |   |
#### § 28.307 Bale of different staple lengths.

Whenever the length of staple of cotton taken from one part of a bale is different from that taken from another part of the same bale, the length of staple of the cotton in such bale shall be that of the part which is the shorter.

[22 FR 10930, Dec. 28, 1957. Redesignated at 49 FR 28391, July 12, 1984]
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

WILLIAM HERNANDEZ,

FDOC Inmate No. M27195,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:20cv3650/MCR/EMT

MARK S. INCH,

Defendant.

_______________________/

ORDER

The Chief Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation on October 

8, 2021 (ECF No. 57). The parties were furnished a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, 

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). There are no timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the record, I have 

determined the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The Chief Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 

57) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

Case 3:20-cv-03650-MCR-EMT Document 60 Filed 11/17/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No.: 3:20cv3650/MCR/EMT

2. Plaintiff’s “Protective Order Civil Right Complaint” (ECF No. 55), 

which the undersigned construes as a motion for a temporary restraining order, is 

DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 17th day of November 2021.

M. Casey Rodgers 

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-03650-MCR-EMT Document 60 Filed 11/17/21 Page 2 of 2