alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Subchapter C of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter C appear by Amdt. 381, 65 FR 64586, Oct. 30, 2000.

§ 283.16 Consolidation of issues. Similar issues involved in appeals by two or more State agencies may be consolidated upon motion by the State agencies, FNS, or at the discretion of the ALJ if it is decided that consolidation would help to promote administrative efficiency. ( a ) *Disposition of consolidated issues.* If the ALJ orders consolidation, the issues consolidated will be considered first. If a hearing has been requested by any of the parties that have had issues consolidated, arguments on the consolidated issues will be heard before arguments on dissimilar issues. The ALJ will take the information into consideration along with arguments on other issues in preparing initial decisions for QC appeals in which some issues have been consolidated.
( b ) *Initial decision.* ( 1 ) If the ALJ decides the evidence and arguments by the State agencies on the consolidated issues cannot be overcome by the evidence presented by FNS and are sufficient to grant the relief requested by a State agency or all State agencies in which the issue is involved, the ALJ shall prepare an initial decision as provided in § 283.17(c).
( 2 ) FNS may file a motion for reconsideration pursuant to § 283.17(d) or seek review by the Judicial Officer in accordance with § 283.20.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 107 (Tuesday, June 4, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 33394]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-13135]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Notice To Extend Submittal Date for Scoping Comments for United 
States Air Force Main Operating Base 2 for the Beddown of the KC-46A 
Tanker Aircraft Environmental Impact Statement

AGENCY: U.S. Air Force, DOD.

ACTION: Notification of Extension for Submittal of Scoping Comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Air Force is issuing this notice to advise the public 
of an extension to submit scoping comments. The initial Notice of 
Availability published in the Federal Register on May 17, 2013 (Vol. 
78, No. 96/Notices/29120), requested public scoping comments no later 
than June 10, 2013. The Air Force has extended the deadline for 
submitting public comments to July 5, 2013. All substantive scoping 
comments received during the public scoping period will be considered 
in the preparation of the Draft EIS.
    Point of Contact: Please direct any written comments or requests 
for information to KC-46A EIS Project Manager, National Guard Bureau, 
NGB/A7AM, 3501 Fetchet Avenue, Joint Base Andrews, Maryland, 20762-
5157.

Henry Williams Jr.,
Acting Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-13135 Filed 6-3-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-P
```
Exhibit 31.2





CERTIFICATIONS*





I, Sunit S. Patel, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Form 10-K of Level 3 Communications, Inc.; and





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.








Date: March 22, 2012


/s/ Sunit S. PatelSunit S. PatelChief Financial Officer


____________________________


* Provide a separate certification for each principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the registrant. See Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a).
#### State Division of Human Rights, on Complaint of Joseph Arnone, Petitioner, v County of Monroe et al., Respondents.

held, decision reserved and matter remitted to State Division of Human Rights for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: The principal issue in this proceeding under section 298 of the Executive Law is whether petitioners’ established policy requiring that all candidates for appointment to the position of Deputy Sheriff-Patrol be 29 years of age or under is an unlawful discriminatory practice under the Human Rights Law. Petitioners contend that, although section 58 of the Civil Service Law (prescribing age requirements for the appointment of police officers covered by civil service) is inapplicable, they were nevertheless justified in adopting the age requirements of section 58 of the Civil Service Law as criteria for the appointment of applicants for the position of Deputy Sheriff-Patrol inasmuch as a Deputy Sheriff-Patrolman performs the same functions as a police officer covered by civil service. Relying on decisions pertaining to the maximum age requirements for appointment of police officers under section 58 of the Civil Service Law (see *Whitehair v Civil Serv. Comm. of Monroe County,*56 AD2d 711; see, also, *Matter of Hawkins v Kohn,*64 AD2d 628; *Matter of Spina v County of Chautauqua,*50 AD2d 178) and of State correctional officers (see *Matter of Figueroa v Bronstein,*38 NY2d 533) petitioners argue that by analogy their requirements are lawful and constitutional. There is insufficient evidence in the record concerning the duties and responsibilities of a Deputy Sheriff-Patrol and the similarities and/or differences between that position and a police officer covered by civil service. The matter is remitted, therefore, to the State Division of Human Rights for further proof and appropriate findings on this issue. (Proceeding pursuant to *1059Executive Law, § 298.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Schnepp, Callahan, Doerr and Witmer, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Notes:

1. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 83 FR 22178, May 14, 2018.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 83 FR 61310, Nov. 29, 2018

3. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 85 FR 65504, Oct. 15, 2020.

4. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 87 FR 44266, July 26, 2022.

#### § 2.11 New principles and periodic reviews.

In the exercise of authority delegated by the Secretary, the application of new principles of major importance or a departure from principles established by the Secretary should be brought to the attention of the Secretary. General officers are responsible for assuring that periodic reviews are conducted of the activities of the agencies assigned to their direction and supervision, as required by 5 U.S.C. 305.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

ALONZO MOORE,

Petitioner,

v. CASE NO. 1:02-cv-00036-MP-AK

ROBERT BUTTERWORTH,

MICHAEL W MOORE,

Respondents.

___________________________/

O R D E R 

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 49, Petitioner's Motion for a Time Extension. 

This motion is being treated as a request before this Court. After reviewing Petitioner's motion, 

Petitioner is hereby GRANTED a thirty day extension of all filing deadlines. Therefore, any

filing Petitioner wishes to make is now due by Monday, September 19, 2005.

DONE AND ORDERED this 18th day of August, 2005

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:02-cv-00036-MP-AK Document 50 Filed 08/18/05 Page 1 of 1
LEMUEL COOPER

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 1009

__________ ___________________/

Opinion filed May 3, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bradford County

. Richard B. Davis, Jr. , Judge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Glen P. Gifford, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Quentin Humphrey, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROWE

, MAKAR

, and BILBREY

, J J

. , CONCUR.
Page 1 of 1

Case No. 1:20cv67-RH-GRJ

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

ACACIA WILLIAMS et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. CASE NO. 1:20cv67-RH-GRJ

RON DESANTIS et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________________________________/

ORDER DISMISSING THE WINTERS CLAIMS 

Based on their notices of voluntary dismissal, ECF Nos. 37 and 38, the 

claims of the plaintiffs Ray Winters and Kathleen Winters are dismissed without 

prejudice. I do not direct the entry of judgment under Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 54(b).

SO ORDERED on April 24, 2020.

s/Robert L. Hinkle

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-00067-RH-GRJ Document 40 Filed 04/24/20 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry

Part J (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry) of the Statement of Organization, Functions, and Delegations of Authority of the Department of Health and Human Services (50 FR 25129-25130, dated June 17, 1985, as amended most recently at 75 FR 62559-62560, dated October 12, 2010) is amended to reflect the reorganization of the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Section J-B, Organization and Functions, is hereby amended as follows:

Delete in its entirety item (10) of the functional statement for the Office of the Director (JAA), Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (J).

Dated: November 5, 2010.

William P. Nichols,

Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 

[FR Doc. 2010-28949 Filed 11-16-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-70-M
Order filed August 14, 2018. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-18-00642-CV

____________

DEBORAH MOHAMED, Appellant

V.

SHAFFIN ALI MOHAMED, Appellee

On Appeal from the 247th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2003-39225

O R D E R

The clerk’s record was filed August 7, 2018. Our review has determined that 

a relevant item may have been omitted from the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P.

34.5(c). The record does not contain an Order signed June 28, 2018.

The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s 

record on or before August 30, 2018, containing the Order signed June 28, 2018.
If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to 

file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted 

item is not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM
#### The State ex rel. Acevedo, Appellant, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellee.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Acevedo v. Indus. Comm.*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 327.]

(No. 97-1405

Submitted August 19, 1998

Decided October 7, 1998.)

*Shapiro, Kendis & Associates Co., L.P.A,*and *Rachel B. Jaffy,*for appellant.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Mary Ann O. Rini,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Douglas and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCTS

Case No. 3:19md2885

LIABILITY LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

Baker, 7:20cv39

Judge M. Casey Rodgers

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones

DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS ORDER NO. 2

This Order addresses Defendants’ objections and counter-designations to 

Plaintiff’s affirmative deposition designations and Plaintiff’s objections to 

Defendants’ counter-designations thereto for the following witness depositions:

1. Berger, Elliott 09-25-2020

2. Kieper, Ronald 12-19-2019

3. Moses, Doug [30(b)(6)] 10-17-2019

4. Salon, Martin 01-29-2020

5. Tuten, Vickie 12-23-2020

6. Warren, Garrad 01-23-2020

SO ORDERED, on this 3rd day of June, 2021.

M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 7:20-cv-00039-MCR-GRJ Document 145 Filed 06/03/21 Page 1 of 1
#### The State of Ohio, Appellant, *v.*Davis, Appellee.

[Cite as *State v. Davis*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 433.]

(No. 98-993

Submitted September 15, 1998

Decided October 28, 1998.)

*Robert P. DeSanto,*Ashland County Prosecuting Attorney, and *John L. Good,*Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.

*David H. Bodiker,*State Public Defender, and *Kevin Fahey,*Assistant Public Defender, for appellee.

The discretionary appeal is allowed.

The discretionary cross-appeal is denied.

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of *State v. Rush*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 53, 697 N.E.2d 634.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick,. F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Notes from Meeting with Bob Spurgin

Attended by:

Spurgin and Associates: Bob Spurgin

EPA Staff: Kristin Fitzgerald

Date: June 25, 2013

EPA had a call with Bob Spurgin. He discussed the variation in what sorts of pharmaceutical 

wastes that publicly owned treatment works (POTWs) will accept from healthcare facilities. He 

mentioned that one POTW in San Francisco is allowing aqueous pharmaceuticals to be 

discharged to it. He also discussed the typical management of “fully-dosed” (or empty) syringes.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1956

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1956 appear at 80 FR 9901, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1956.149 [Reserved]
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS  ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Robert M. Brown, Chief Financial Officer of BabyUniverse, Inc. (the “Company”) in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify that to the best of my knowledge: 

(1)     the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

(2)     the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 14th day of August 2006. 

|   | */s/ Robert M. Brown*     |
|--------|---------------------------|
|   |                           |
|   | *Robert M. Brown*         |
|   | Chief   Financial Officer |

----
#### § 28.959 Limitation of testing services.

If at any time funds available for services under the regulations in this subpart may be insufficient to provide for the testing of all samples that may be submitted for the purpose, the Director may place reasonable limitations upon the quantities of samples to be submitted by individuals during any one fiscal year or any one calendar month, and may direct that samples received from cotton breeders shall take precedence over those received from other persons.

[35 FR 8532, June 3, 1970. Redesignated at 46 FR 30075, June 5, 1981]
2006-0788.

#### Ohio Consumers’ Counsel v. Pub. Util. Comm.

Public Utilities Commission, No. 05-276-EL-AIR. This cause is pending before this court as an appeal from the Public Utilities Commission. Upon consideration of the motion of Dayton Power *&*Light Company for leave to intervene as an appellee,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion is granted.
#### § 29.1083 Wet (W).

Any sound tobacco containing excessive moisture to the extent that it is in unsafe or doubtful-keeping order. Wet applies to any tobacco which is not damaged but which is likely to damage if treated in the customary manner. (See Rule 22.)

[42 FR 21092, Apr. 25, 1977. Redesignated at 47 FR 51721, Nov. 17, 1982, 49 FR 16756, Apr. 20, 1984, and 51 FR 25027, July 10, 1986]
#### § 29.1063 Strips.

The sides of a tobacco leaf from which the stem has been removed from a lot of tobacco composed of strips.

[42 FR 21092, Apr. 25, 1977. Redesignated at 47 FR 51721, Nov. 17, 1982, 48 FR 29671, June 28, 1983, 49 FR 16756, Apr. 20, 1984, and 51 FR 25027, July 10, 1986]
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 1:02-cr-29-MMP-AK

RAYMOND REED, JR.,

Defendant.

___________________________/

O R D E R 

This cause is before the Court on Defendant Reed’s motion to vacate pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2255. Doc. 203. While the motion is on the proper form, it has not been completed in

full, and therefore, the motion must be amended. For example, Defendant claims that all

grounds for relief are predicated on ineffective assistance of counsel. He does not, however, set

forth even basic statements explaining how counsel acted ineffectively in representing him. 

When the Court examined the supporting memorandum, it likewise found no stated grounds of

ineffective assistance. Indeed, ineffective assistance of counsel is mentioned only in one place in

the memorandum: “Due to ineffective assistance of counsel, the court would never have seen

the truth of the matter, this is why the court stated that the warrantless entry into the home was

lawful.” This is plainly insufficient to state a claim for relief, and all other complaints center on

whether the search was lawful, a question which has been decided adversely to Defendant by the

Eleventh Circuit. Defendant will therefore be given an opportunity to amend his motion to

vacate. Towards that end, he should state specific facts as to how counsel’s actions or inactions

deprived him of his constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel. All grounds for relief
Page 2 of 2

should be stated on the form itself. Defendant is reminded that N.D. Loc. R. 15.1 provides that

matters not set forth in the amended pleading are deemed abandoned. In other words, the

amended motion replaces entirely the claims raised in the original § 2255 motion, and Defendant

cannot merely refer back to those other pleadings or the supporting memorandum but must

restate his claims in their entirety when he amends the motion on this occasion. Defendant may,

of course, include additional pages as needed to set forth the bases of his amended motion, and to

the extent that he believes that a supporting memorandum is necessary, he may submit it as well,

but it must not exceed 25 pages in length. The memorandum cannot, however, replace the

requirements of completing the form.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

That the Clerk of Court shall forward to Defendant three § 2255 forms;

That no later than August 31, 2009, Defendant shall file an “amended motion” and one

identical copy including any exhibits and memoranda. He shall keep an identical copy for his

records;

That the Amended Motion shall include all claims which Defendant wants to place before

the Court for consideration, and any claims not brought forth in the Amended Motion shall be

deemed abandoned;

That failure to respond to this order as directed or any future orders will result in a

recommendation of dismissal of this action.

DONE AND ORDERED this 27th day of July, 2009.

s/ A. KORNBLUM 

ALLAN KORNBLUM

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case No: 1:02-cr-29-MMP-AK
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Brampton Crest
      International Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the nine month period ending
      September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
      the
      date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brad Hacker, Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
      that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




By:
            /s/
                Brad HackerBrad
                HackerChief
                Financial OfficerNovember
                14, 2008






33
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter C of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter C appear by Amdt. 381, 65 FR 64586, Oct. 30, 2000.

#### § 283.24 Incorporation of procedures by reference.

Except as otherwise provided, the following procedures detailed in subpart B of this part shall apply to appeals of QC claims of less than $50,000: §§ 283.5 *Motion to Dismiss*; 283.6 *Answer*; 283.8 *Rebuttal or Amendment of Appeal or Answer*; 283.9 *Withdrawal of Appeal*; 283.10 *Consent Decision*; 283.18 *Motions and Requests*; 283.19 *ALJ's*; 283.20 *Review by the Judicial Officer*; 283.21 *Ex Parte Communications*; 283.22 *Filings; Service; Extensions of Time; and Computations of Time*; and 283.23 *Procedural Matters.*