alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. §1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kodiak Oil & Gas Corp. (the "Registrant") for the
period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Keith Doss, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Date:

August 5, 2008By:

/s/KEITH DOSSKeith Doss Chief Financial Officer
(principal financial officer)


---



QuickLinks
#### 89 Jamaica, Inc., Respondent, v. American Mutual Services Corp., Appellant.

Order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated January 14, 3966, affirmed insofar as appealed from, and judgment of said court, dated February 1, 1966, affirmed, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Appeal from order of said court, dated January 7, 1966, dismissed, without costs. That order was superseded by the order of January 14, 1966, granting reargument and adhering to the court’s original decision. Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur; Hopkins, J., concurs in the dismissal of the appeal from the original order of January 7, 1966, but votes to reverse the order of January 14, 1966, insofar as appealed from and to reverse the judgment, on the ground that a triable issue exists as to whether the plaintiff landlord is estopped to enforce the provisions of the lease with respect to the defendant tenant’s giving notice to cancel the lease.
#### In the Matter of Brunilda Espinosa, Petitioner, v Barbara B. Blum, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, et al., Respondents.

— Determination of the respondent State commissioner dated March 16, 1979, unanimously modified, on the consent of the State commissioner, to remand for recalculation of the reduction and the determination is otherwise confirmed, without costs and without disbursements. No opinion. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sandler, Sullivan, Bloom and Silverman, JJ.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:96cr57-03/RV

CHARLES RANDALL HARRISON

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Senior Judge Roger Vinson on October 27, 2005

Motion/Pleadings: Motion for reconsideration of Court Order (doc. 359) denying defendant’s

Motion to dismiss due to lack of jurisdiction 

Filed by Defendant on 10/27/2005 Doc.# 362 

RESPONSES:

on Doc.#

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

 Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

 s/Jerry Marbut

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Jerry Marbut

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 28th day of

 October , 2005, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) Jurisdiction is not in question in this case.

 /s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

Senior United States District Judge

Case 3:96-cr-00057-RV-MD Document 363 Filed 10/28/05 Page 1 of 1
Order entered January 8, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00868-CR

JUAN GABRIEL SOSA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-1612055-L

ORDER

We DENY appellant’s request to remove the case from the submission 

docket. We GRANT appellant’s request to file a supplemental brief addressing two 

issues. Appellant is ordered to file the supplemental brief, if any, on or before 

JANUARY 23, 2021. The State’s responsive brief, if it deems one is necessary,

shall be filed within TEN DAYS of the filing of appellant’s supplemental brief. 

/s/ DAVID J. SCHENCK 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
§ 252.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) *Purpose.* This part provides a program whereby the Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) and private processors of food may enter into agreements under which the processor will process and distribute designated donated food to eligible recipient agencies. The intent of the program is to encourage private industry, acting in cooperation with the States and FNS, to develop new markets in which donated food may be utilized. It is expected that the processors will use their marketing abilities to encourage eligible recipient agencies to participate in the program. Additionally, recipient agencies will benefit by being able to purchase processed end products at a substantially reduced price.
( b ) *Scope.* The terms and conditions set forth in this part are those under which processors may enter into agreements with FNS for the processing of commodities designated by the Secretary of Agriculture and the minimum requirements which NCP processors must meet. Also prescribed are distributing agency and recipient agency responsibilities.
( c ) *Eligible recipient agencies.* Recipient agencies shall be eligible to participate in the NCP Program to the extent of their eligibility to receive the food involved in the NCP Program, pursuant to § 250.8 and part 251.
#### § 2811.5 Appeals.

*Procedure.* Any person whose initial request is denied in whole or in part may appeal that denial, in accordance with 7 CFR 1.6(e) and 1.8, to the Director, Office of Operations, USDA, Room 113-W Administration Building, 14th & Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20250.
#### § 29.2255 Class.

A major division of tobacco based on method of cure or principal usage.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350 The undersigned, John M. Fluke, Jr., the Interim Principal
Executive Officer of CellCyte Genetics Corporation, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q of CellCyte Genetics Corporation, for the quarterly period ended September
30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of CellCyte Genetics
Corporation. Date: November
13, 2009. /s/
John M. Fluke, Jr.__
___John M.
Fluke, Jr.Interim Principal Executive
Officer __________   Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350 The undersigned, Randy A. Lieber, the Principal Accounting Officer
of CellCyte Genetics Corporation, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
 Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CellCyte
Genetics Corporation, for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition
and results of operations of CellCyte Genetics Corporation. Date: November
13, 2009. /s/
Randy A. Lieber___Randy A.
LieberPrincipal Accounting Officer __________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE REGISTRANT'S
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31, 1999, AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,384,051
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,584,470
<ALLOWANCES>                                   440,900
<INVENTORY>                                 30,987,826
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            38,987,569
<PP&E>                                      38,687,162
<DEPRECIATION>                              22,680,458
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              55,217,042
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       34,225,150
<BONDS>                                        797,180
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,339
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,020,597
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                55,217,042
<SALES>                                    154,590,933
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           154,590,933
<CGS>                                      101,360,424
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              101,360,424
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            49,892,795
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,417,017
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,017,008
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,310,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            707,008
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   707,008
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 1956

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1956 appear at 80 FR 9901, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1956.71 Settling uncollectible recapture receivables.

The settlement of uncollectible recapture receivables will be fully documented on a debt settlement form and retained in the case file.

[58 FR 21345, Apr. 21, 1993]
TTM Waste Water Treatment Systems

Each TTM printed circuit board manufacturing facility has an on

- site waste water treatment (WWT) system for metals removal from both rinse waters and spent baths. These treatment systems are the traditional pH adjustment using sodium hydroxide to a
nominal p H 8

- 9 range, acceptable for discharge under permit pursuant to the local pretreatment program to the municipal POTW (Publicly Owned Treatment Works). In addition to pH adjustment, a chelate breaking reagent such as DTC (sodium dimethyl dithiocarbamate) o r polysulfide is used to precipitate the chelated copper in the tetraamine copper dichloride (TACD) and other chelated copper sources

. Precipitated copper and other precipitated metals are classified as a F006 listed waste, and are then removed via tradit ional filter press for beneficial recycling of the metals contained in the WWT sludge. Treated waste water is monitored in strict accordance with the POTW and monitoring results are reported on a monthly or quarterly basis as required by each permit.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2244 

To designate the attack that occurred at a recruiting station in Little Rock, 

Arkansas, on June 1, 2009, in which Private William Long of the 

United States Army was killed and Private Quinton Ezeagwula of the 

United States Army was wounded, as an international terrorist attack 

for which the two soldiers are to be awarded the Purple Heart. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 4, 2013 

Mr. GRIFFIN of Arkansas (for himself, Mr. CRAWFORD, Mr. COTTON, and Mr. 

WOMACK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To designate the attack that occurred at a recruiting station 

in Little Rock, Arkansas, on June 1, 2009, in which 

Private William Long of the United States Army was 

killed and Private Quinton Ezeagwula of the United 

States Army was wounded, as an international terrorist 

attack for which the two soldiers are to be awarded 

the Purple Heart. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2244 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Honoring Ezeagwula 

3 and Long Act’’ or the ‘‘HEAL Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF LITTLE ROCK RECRUITING STA5 TION ATTACK AS AN INTERNATIONAL TER6 RORIST ATTACK FOR PURPOSES OF AWARD7 ING THE PURPLE HEART. 

8 The attack that occurred at a recruiting station in 

9 Little Rock, Arkansas, on June 1, 2009, in which Private 

10 William Long of the United States Army was killed and 

11 Private Quinton Ezeagwula of the United States Army 

12 was wounded, was an international terrorist attack carried 

13 out by an enemy of the United States, and pursuant to 

14 Army Regulations regarding the award of the Purple 

15 Heart (AR 600–8–22, chapter 2, section II, 2–8b), Pri16 vates Long and Ezeagwula are entitled to be awarded the 

17 Purple Heart. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6575

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

TYREE MAURICE BLANKS,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. 

(4:03-cr-00388-TLW-1; 4:07-cv-70017-TL)

Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: September 2, 2010

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tyree Maurice Blanks, Appellant Pro Se. Carrie Ann Fisher, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Tyree Maurice Blanks seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 

Supp. 2010) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record 

and conclude that Blanks has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
§ 247.29 Reports and recordkeeping. ( a ) *What recordkeeping requirements must State and local agencies meet?* State and local agencies must maintain accurate and complete records relating to the receipt, disposal, and inventory of commodities, the receipt and disbursement of administrative funds and other funds, eligibility determinations, fair hearings, and other program activities. State and local agencies must also maintain records pertaining to liability for any improper distribution of, use of, loss of, or damage to commodities, and the results obtained from the pursuit of claims arising in favor of the State or local agency. All records must be retained for a period of three years from the end of the fiscal year to which they pertain, or, if they are related to unresolved claims actions, audits, or investigations, until those activities have been resolved. All records must be available during normal business hours for use in management reviews, audits, investigations, or reports of the General Accounting Office.
( b ) *What reports must State and local agencies submit to FNS?* State agencies must submit the following reports to FNS: ( 1 ) *SF-425, Federal Financial Report.* The State agency must submit the SF-425, Federal Financial Report, to report the financial status of the program at the close of the fiscal year. This report must be submitted within 90 days after the end of the fiscal year. Obligations must be reported for the fiscal year in which they occur. Revised reports may be submitted at a later date, but FNS will not be responsible for reimbursing unpaid obligations later than one year after the end of the fiscal year in which they were incurred.
( 2 ) *FNS-153, Monthly Report of the Commodity Supplemental Food Program and Quarterly Administrative Financial Status Report.* The State agency must submit the FNS-153 on a monthly basis. FNS may permit the data contained in the report to be submitted less frequently, or in another format. The report must be submitted within 30 days after the end of the reporting period. On the FNS-153, the State agency reports: ( i ) The number of program participants;
( ii ) The receipt and distribution of commodities, and beginning and ending inventories, as well as other commodity data; and
( iii ) On a quarterly basis, the cumulative amount of administrative funds expended and obligated, and the amount remaining unobligated.
( 3 ) *FNS-191, Racial/Ethnic Group Participation.* Local agencies must submit a report of racial/ethnic participation each year, using the FNS-191.
( c ) *Is there any other information that State and local agencies must provide to FNS?* FNS may require State and local agencies to provide data collected in the program to aid in the evaluation of the effect of program benefits on the low-income populations served. Any such requests for data will not include identification of particular individuals.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control numbers 0584-0025, 0584-0293) [70 FR 47063, Aug. 11, 2005, as amended at 72 FR 24184, May 2, 2007; 79 FR 38751, July 9, 2014; 85 FR 68722, Oct. 30, 2020]
. :.: : .:~ . . 

: 

1 

: . . . 

: i 

_ ' O~FiCEOF~RArCoRNEYGENERALOFrEXAS 

. ! . AUST'IN ., \ * *..; . ..~ :. - 

..; 

-o.- 

, '... i: .' 

.I'. '-'. : 

-- 

'. 

. . 

. . . 

. . . 

,-J:-j: 

6, f 2 

_’ 

. 

._ .~ . 

.._ 

. ...._ 

, 
: 

_. 

. 

. . ~. . . . 

i Aa we~understati your letter, roti no8 d*si& to 

_* &we those 'o&ployees, copoc&ally thoss who have ceased,to 

'. work for $ht3 Pod83rnl Gorornmnt, on your pay roll ,for a 

fmfYiolont lcq$I~Of tint for sn3.d crrployees to draw their 

ealary,for tho r.acat&on pf?rtcrd, to W.%ch they ~?ouXd ham 

boon entitled if they .had contimod In your ezplognent. i. " 

In 1041 the Lo&slaturo in&&d fn the General 

. . . . . _: . . 

.:. - %al&rlos to bo @d ooooting.to the 

&ssifiO~tions of tm GoOm sOcwitg n&d 

*_ . . 

. ‘. 

_.__ 

._: 

;,/.:. 

^. ;i... 

to eaployoes solco~cd and rated under' the 

pfnwnnol plan %n e2foot betgeomthe Sock13~'. 

'. Security Baard.axxl the.State ,?genriy. * Q 9. 

,\. * Salaries of the employees of-the Unen;ploy- 

. .. ncnt Coqxssstion Ooiadsd~n 4Ml ~mmhors of 

.t3l8 cols?d.osfon shall b0 p55Lic In:accord~co'.' 

--.ti,th the a~;reement~md.e between the Cats- ._ 

.- ~si.onaaxI the Social Security 1soard,.bnt 3.31 I I 

._ ~' IIG case shall such.sala$-Lesba less thau . . 

. _' th0se ,$.hqhxl by tho aCt Groatingltho Un63li@~t CW~ZiSdZiOI3 cGn!&SSiOll." : 

i .~ . - ./ 

Said provkxLons of-the A~oprlutlon Eill above 

'~&oted do dolegate to fho'Soclu1 Secuz=Tty Board aud the x&mbars of the~comdssiqn th0 authority to clsasLfy and rata .. 

the pfwsonnel of CNs CozwLosion. Uoweve~,uo call your at- 1. 

.tentLGn to tho fact that the authorization prGuidon that saxzir3.c~ shall be p&d accordi~ to thha n~reements tieby the 

-named parties. 

'In your letter you stat3 the So&al Security Board . . 

. no* desires you to rcplaoo ocrttin persons on your pyroll 

for a n-pciflod number of dqo, not for tha purpose of I;or- :' 

f@M~ lsly actu31 se~ce, but for tjao sole puqose 09 purr 

dotting those parsons who formrlg were mploycd by gou.to 

clraa conpmsation or pay for their vncatictn period. In our 

opinion, the provisicns of ths A~~rG~~~ationJill~~bove 

quotcii, do uot relar the &$.slatLve control wer s&d States 

&~cnncy cxocpt In tho mnucr rcoited. __ 

There is attached to the donaral Ap~~o~rj.ation'E3.11 

of 1941 a nutior of n@nuaral ~x-octs~o~s~~ arsong those is subsection 9, dOJl reads a5 f0110Csr 

: 
“ . 

.i : 

_. 

._ 

.x’ 

..- : : 

. . 

‘.<;t . . . .? 

. ‘. ; :.’ 

: tm tk?a ~li&3aGed to be %.A your Gzploy. - ‘. : - 

. . ; : 

: 

. 

i 

.
#### *Garrison vs. Haydon.*

Ejectment».

Case 56.

Appeal from the Jessamine Circuit; W. L. Kelly, Judge.

*Deed. Record. Statute.*

April 16.

A deed must be recorded in the county in which tbe land may be at tbe time of recording. The certificate of the clerk of the pounty, in which the land lay, at the date of the deed, but not when admitted to record, is not such authentication as will authorize the deed, to be used as evidence of title in an ejectment.

Judge Robertson

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Garrison, in deducing title to a tract of land in Jessamine county,, in an action of ejectment vs. Haydon, offered a deed, certified by the clerk of the county court of Fayette, for the land, acknowledged and recorded in Fayette. The land lay in Fayette at the date of the deed, but at the date of the acknowledgment, it was in Jessamine; the latter county having, in the mean time, been established. And the only question tobe decided, in this case is, whether the court erred in rejecting the d.eed.

A proper construction of either, the letter or object, of ’the act of Assembly, which requires deeds for land to be recorded in the county in which the land lies., must sustain the opinion of the circuit court.

The deed must be recorded in the county in which-the land lies at the time the deed is deposited for registration. When a party is about to deposit his deed to be recorded, the act of Assembly addresses him in this language: “Have it recorded in the county in which the land liesthat is, the. county in which it lies now, when you make the deposit.

The object of this requisition, is to give notice in the county, of the transferrence of the title to the land.

As, therefore, the clerk of Fayette had no legal right t'o receive the acknowledgment, his certificate of the. *223'¡¡act of the acknowledgment, is no authentication 'of the deed.

Crittenden, for appellant.

The recording a deed not being necessary to pass *the*title, as between the parties to it, proof of the original by the subscribing witnesses, would have been sufficient for the plaintiff in this case. But as he chose not to offer such proof, and relied on the certificate of the Fayette clerk, he must abide the consequence of his error. See Astors vs. Wells and al., 4 Wheaton, 466.

The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.