alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1997
<CASH>                                           78,59
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     11,988
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                90,947
<PP&E>                                         112,145
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,409
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 264,367
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          632,114
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,935
<OTHER-SE>                                   (379,682)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   264,367
<SALES>                                      1,946,942
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,946,942
<CGS>                                          856,953
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,582,196
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (492,207)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (492,207)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (492,207)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)
        

</TABLE>
§ 249.23 Records and reports. ( a ) *Recordkeeping requirements.* Each State agency must maintain full and complete records concerning SFMNP operations. Such records must comply with 2 CFR part 200, subpart D and USDA implementing regulations 2 CFR part 400 and part 415 and the following requirements: ( 1 ) Records must include, but not be limited to, information pertaining to certification, financial operations, SFMNP coupon issuance and redemption, authorized outlet (farmers, farmers' markets, and CSA program) agreements, authorized outlet monitoring, CSA program agreements, invoices, delivery receipts, equipment purchases and inventory, nutrition education, fair hearings, and civil rights procedures.
( 2 ) All records must be retained for a minimum of 3 years following the date of submission of the final expenditure report for the period to which the report pertains. If any litigation, claim, negotiation, audit or other action involving the records has been started before the end of the 3-year period, the records must be kept until all issues are resolved, or until the end of the regular 3-year period, whichever is later. If FNS deems any of the SFMNP records to be of historical interest, it may require the State agency to forward such records to FNS whenever the State agency is disposing of them.
( 3 ) Records for nonexpendable property acquired in whole or in part with SFMNP funds must be retained for three years after its final disposition.
( 4 ) All records must be available during normal business hours for representatives of FNS of the Comptroller General of the United States to inspect, audit, and copy. Any reports resulting from such examinations shall not divulge names of individuals.
( b ) *Financial and participant reports.* State agencies must submit financial and SFMNP performance data on a yearly basis as specified by FNS. Such information must include, but shall not be limited to: ( 1 ) Number of participants served with Federal SFMNP funds;
( 2 ) Value of coupons issued and/or eligible foods ordered under CSA programs;
( 3 ) Value of coupons redeemed and/or eligible foods provided to participants under CSA programs; and
( 4 ) Number of authorized outlets by type; i.e., farmers, farmers' markets, roadside stands, and CSA programs.
( c ) *Source documentation.* To be acceptable for audit purposes, all financial and SFMNP performance reports must be traceable to source documentation.
( d ) *Certification of reports.* Financial and SFMNP reports must be certified as to their completeness and accuracy by the person given that responsibility by the State agency.
( e ) *Use of reports.* FNS will use State agency reports to measure progress in achieving objectives set forth in the State Plan, and this part, or other State agency performance plans. If it is determined, through review of State agency reports, SFMNP or financial analysis, or an audit, that a State agency is not meeting the objectives set forth in its State Plan, FNS may request additional information including, but not limited to, reasons for failure to achieve these objectives.
[71 FR 74630, Dec. 12, 2006, as amended at 81 FR 66497, Sept. 28, 2016]
Amendment to Employment Agreement--Alan F. Schultz



 EXHIBIT 10.11(H) 
  
 AMENDMENT 
 TO 
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
  
 THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is made December 21, 2004 by and between Valassis Communications, Inc. (the
“Corporation”) and Alan F. Schultz (the “Executive”). 
  
 WHEREAS, the Corporation and the Executive entered into that certain Employment Agreement effective as of March 18, 1992, as amended on December 22, 1994, January 3, 1995, December 19, 1995 and September 15,
1998, December 16, 1999 March 14, 2001, June 26, 2002 and January 9, 2004 (the “Employment Agreement”); and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Corporation and the Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement to reflect an increase in the Executive’s Annual Base
Salary. 
  
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the above
recitals, the parties hereto agree as set forth below. 
  
 1. The
first sentence of Section 3(a) of the Employment Agreement shall be amended to read as follows: 
  
 “The Executive’s Annual Base Salary (“Annual Base Salary”), payable on a biweekly basis, shall be at the annual rate
of not less than $780,000 effective January 1, 2005.” 
  
 2.
All other terms of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 
  
 3. This instrument, together with the Employment Agreement, contains the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive and the Corporation have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the day and
year first above written. 
  

			
	 VALASSIS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Barry P. Hoffman


	 Name:
	 	 Barry P. Hoffman

	 Title:
	 	 Executive Vice President and Legal Counsel

		
	 	 	 /s/ Alan F. Schultz


	 	 	 Alan F. Schultz
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. Case No. 3:96cr74/RV

DARRELL GREEN

 

GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE TO THE DEFENDANT=S MOTION FOR 

EXONERATION OF PERSONAL SURETY BONDS AND

FULL DISCHARGE OF ALL PERSONAL SECURITIES

COMES NOW the United States of America, and responds to the defendant’s motion as 

follows:

1. The defendant continues to file frivolous pleadings based on clearly baseless 

factual contentions with the apparent intention of advancing an indisputably meritless legal theory 

that he should be released from imprisonment.

2. The defendant’s instant motion falsely claims that a personal surety bond was 

issued following his arrest to secure bail set by this court. (Doc. 722 at page 2). The defendant 

was never granted any bail or any other condition of pre-trial release. (Doc. 45) Further, the 

defendant never secured any type of appeal bond following his conviction.

3. Defendant’s instant motion and many filed over the past six months (See Docs.

642, 643, 646, 648, 707, and 722) claim an “agreement” with the government wherein he has 

somehow satisfied his obligations with respect to a surety bond issued to secure a bail that was 

never set by the court in his case. The instant motion requests the court to order that his debt owed 

to the government as a result of his criminal conviction (one apparently based on an agreement that 

does not exist, regarding a bond that was never satisfied issued with respect to bail that was never 

Case 3:96-cr-00074-RV-EMT Document 723 Filed 10/31/12 Page 1 of 2
2

granted by the court) be deemed satisfied with the result that he be deemed to have satisfied the 

criminal judgment subjecting him to life imprisonment in his case.

4. The instant motion cites Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 46 as a basis for the 

relief requested. However, the standards for release and bail, as well as for forfeiture of 

money/property posted for such, set forth in Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 46, are 

irrelevant to the release of a federal prisoner who was never granted bail and whose conviction 

and sentence have been affirmed on direct appeal and collateral review.

5. The instant motion is simply another attempt by the defendant to attack his 

criminal conviction and void his judgment and sentence. It should be dismissed as frivolous and 

malicious.

Wherefore, the United States respectfully requests that the instant motion be denied .

Respectfully submitted,

PAMELA C. MARSH

United States Attorney

 /s/ Edwin Knight 

EDWIN KNIGHT

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Florida Bar No. 0380156

21 East Garden Street, Suite 400

Pensacola, Florida 32502-5675

(850) 444-4000 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a copy of this motion has been sent via U.S. Mail to Darrell 

Green, Pro Se, Prisoner No. 049957-004, U.S.P. Lee County, P.O. Box 305, Jonesville, Virginia 

24263, on this 31st day of October, 2012.

/s/ Edwin Knight 

EDWIN KNIGHT

Case 3:96-cr-00074-RV-EMT Document 723 Filed 10/31/12 Page 2 of 2
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

September 21, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 128040 & (50) Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman,

Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 128040 

 COA: 249891 
 Wayne CC: 03-001951-01 

DEMOND ANTHONY HARRIS, 03-001952-02 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 28, 2004 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to 

remand is DENIED. 

CAVANAGH and KELLY, JJ., would remand this case for a hearing pursuant to 

People v Ginther, 390 Mich 436 (1973). 

t0914 

I, CORBIN R. DAVIS, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 21, 2005 

Clerk
2006-0498.

#### State Farm Mut. Auto v. Reid.

Cuyahoga App. No. 87729. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. It appears from the records of the court that the appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due April 3, 2006, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause is dismissed sua sponte.
97- 1831.

#### Leber v. Buckeye Union Ins. Co.

Erie App. No. E-96-014. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Erie County. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion to withdraw prior motion for full court to select an acting justice in the event of a recusal.

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to withdraw be, and hereby is, granted.

Resnick, J., not participating.
Exhibit
31.1



Certification
of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I,
Christopher Furman, certify that:



1.
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2022 of Vitro Biopharma, Inc.;



2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;



3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;



4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)
[intentionally omitted];



(c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and



(d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s
fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control
over financial reporting; and



5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent functions):



(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and



(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s
internal control over financial reporting.



Date:
January 30, 2023



| | By:    | /s/
    Christopher Furman                               
| | ------ | ---------------------------------------------------------
| | Name:  | Christopher Furman                                       
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer
    (Principal Executive Officer)
#### Roberto B. COLON, Claimant-Appellee, v. R. James NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellant.

No. 2006-7379.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Nov. 8, 2006.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs’ unopposed motion to vol*984untarily dismiss his appeal in Colon v. Nicholson, 04-1075 (Vet.App.),

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion to dismiss is granted.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs
Nicor Inc.
                                                        Form 11-K
                                                        Exhibit 99.01


                Certification of Plan Administrator

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned plan administrator of the Birdsall,
Inc. Retirement Savings Plan (the "Plan") hereby certifies, to his knowledge,
that:

      (i) the accompanying Annual Report on Form 11-K of the Plan for the annual
   period ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
   requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
   Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly
   presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
   results of operations of the Plan.1


   Dated: June 27, 2003        /s/ ROBERT MARK CHAPMAN
          --------------       ----------------------------
                               Robert Mark Chapman
                               Plan Administrator and
                               Vice President Pricing and
                               Organization Support, Birdsall, Inc.


--------
1 The foregoing certification has been provided in accordance with the
requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Because it is an employee
benefit plan, the Birdsall, Inc. Retirement Savings Plan does not have results
of operations. The foregoing certification is being "furnished," not filed, and
thus is not incorporated by reference into any 1933 Act registration statement.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

MAURICE GRAY,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO.: 4:20cv96-MW/HTC

LT. JACOBS, et al.,

Defendants.

___________________________/ 

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report 

and Recommendation. ECF No. 5. Upon consideration, no objections having been 

filed by the parties,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as this Court’s 

opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “This case is DISMISSED without 

prejudice for failure to prosecute, failure to comply with Court orders, and failure 

to state a claim.” The Clerk shall also close the file.

SO ORDERED on May 26, 2020.

s/Mark E. Walker ____

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00096-MW-HTC Document 6 Filed 05/26/20 Page 1 of 1
#### § 29.3076 Variegated (K).

Any leaf of which 20 percent or more of its surface is yellow, grayish, mottled, or bleached, and does not blend with the normal colors of the type or group and is generally characterized by a lower degree of leaf structure and maturity than tobacco of the corresponding group and quality. (See Rule 15.)

[24 FR 8771, Oct. 29, 1959. Redesignated at 47 FR 51722, Nov. 17, 1982, 49 FR 16758, Apr. 20, 1984, and 51 FR 40407, Nov. 7, 1986]
Case 3:20-cv-04698-TKW-HTC Document 1-6 Filed 03/11/20 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:20-cv-04698-TKW-HTC Document 1-6 Filed 03/11/20 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:20-cv-04698-TKW-HTC Document 1-6 Filed 03/11/20 Page 3 of 3
#### § 27.73 Supervision of transfers of cotton.

Whenever the owner of any cotton inspected and sampled for classification pursuant to this subpart and for which the owner holds valid cotton class certificates desires to transfer such cotton to a different delivery point, or to a different warehouse at the same delivery point, for the purpose of having it made available for delivery upon a basis grade contract, such transfer shall be effected under the supervision of an exchange inspection agency or a supervisor of cotton inspection.

[48 FR 49213, Oct. 25, 1983]
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
      a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Alan Ginsberg

Alan Ginsberg
Chief Financial Officer
 36
#### § 210.27 Educational prohibitions.

In carrying out the provisions of the Act, the Department shall not impose any requirements with respect to teaching personnel, curriculum, instructions, methods of instruction, or materials of instruction in any school as a condition for participation in the Program.

[53 FR 29147, Aug. 2, 1988. Redesignated at 56 FR 32948, July 17, 1991, as amended at 64 FR 50741, Sept. 20, 1999]
#### § 28.904 Market news.

The Director shall cause to be distributed to producers of cotton and to others on request, timely information on prices for various qualities of cotton.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

ANTWAUN VONTRELL LEE,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:19-cv-320-AW-GRJ

DR. MICHAEL AMIEL,

Defendant.

________________________________/

ORDER

The magistrate judge has entered a report and recommendation (ECF No. 30), 

to which no objections have been filed. The report and recommendation was sent to 

the plaintiff but returned as undeliverable. The clerk then resubmitted it to the 

plaintiff’s last known address. The plaintiff was instructed to update the court with 

address changes. ECF No. 3 at 2.

Having carefully considered the report and recommendation, I now conclude 

it should be adopted. It is incorporated into this order. The motion to dismiss (ECF 

No. 26) is granted, and the complaint (ECF No. 8) is dismissed for failure to state a 

claim. 

The plaintiff will be given one final opportunity to try to state a claim. He has 

14 days to file a second amended complaint. If he timely files a second amended 

Case 1:19-cv-00320-AW-GRJ Document 32 Filed 01/26/21 Page 1 of 2
2

complaint, the matter will be returned to the magistrate judge for further 

proceedings. If he does not, final judgment will enter. 

SO ORDERED on January 26, 2021. 

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 1:19-cv-00320-AW-GRJ Document 32 Filed 01/26/21 Page 2 of 2