alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS

EARPLUG PRODUCTS

LIABILITY LITIGATION

Case No. 3:19-md-2885

This document relates to:

Ferman C. Barnes

Judge M. Casey Rodgers

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones

Case No. 8:20-cv-05382

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

Comes now R. SCOTT VINCENT, with the law firm of WILLIAMS MCDANIEL, 

PLLC, and gives notice that he will appear as counsel of record for Ferman C. Barnes in the 

Master Docket pursuant to Pretrial Order No. 3 [ECF No. 4]. Mr. Vincent has completed the 

administrative requirements outlined in Pretrial Order No. 3, and has been granted admission 

pro hac vice pursuant to paragraph IV.A of Pretrial Order No. 3. Counsel respectfully requests 

that all notices, correspondence, filings and other papers in the Master Docket of MDL 2885 

be served upon him at the address listed below.

This the 23rd day of January, 2023.

Respectfully submitted, 

WILLIAMS McDANIEL, PLLC

By: /s/ R. Scott Vincent

R. Scott Vincent (#21055)

717 S. White Station Road, Suite 1

Memphis, Tennessee 38117

(901) 766-0887 (Phone)

(901) 766-0915 (Facsimile)

svincent@williamsmcdaniel.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3640 Filed 01/23/23 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 23rd day of January, 2023, a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing was electronically filed with the Clerk of Court and served using the CM/ECF 

system.

/s/ R. Scott Vincent

R. Scott Vincent

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3640 Filed 01/23/23 Page 2 of 2
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2099 

To provide for an accounting of total United States contributions to the 

United Nations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 22, 2013 

Mr. BROOKS of Alabama introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide for an accounting of total United States 

contributions to the United Nations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPORT ON UNITED STATES CONTRIBUTIONS 

4 TO THE UNITED NATIONS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the 

6 date of the enactment of this Act and annually thereafter, 

7 the Director of the Office of Management and Budget 

8 shall submit to Congress a report on all assessed and vol9 untary contributions, including in-kind, of the United 

10 States Government to the United Nations and its affiliVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:04 May 25, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2099.IH H2099

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2099 IH

1 ated agencies and related bodies during the previous fiscal 

2 year. 

3 (b) CONTENT.—The report required under subsection 

4 (a) shall include the following elements: 

5 (1) The total amount of all assessed and vol6 untary contributions, including in-kind, of the 

7 United States Government to the United Nations 

8 and its affiliated agencies and related bodies during 

9 the previous fiscal year. 

10 (2) The approximate percentage of United 

11 States Government contributions to each United Na12 tions affiliated agency or body in such fiscal year 

13 when compared with all contributions to each such 

14 agency or body from any source in such fiscal year. 

15 (3) For each such United States Government 

16 contribution— 

17 (A) the amount of each such contribution; 

18 (B) a description of each such contribution 

19 (including whether assessed or voluntary); 

20 (C) the department or agency of the 

21 United States Government responsible for each 

22 such contribution; 

23 (D) the purpose of each such contribution; 

24 and 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2099 IH

1 (E) the United Nations or its affiliated 

2 agency or related body receiving the contribu3 tion. 

4 (c) SCOPE OF INITIAL REPORT.—The first report re5 quired under subsection (a) shall include the information 

6 required under this section for the previous three fiscal 

7 years. 

8 (d) PUBLIC AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION.—Not 

9 later than 14 days after submitting a report required 

10 under subsection (a), the Director of the Office of Man11 agement and Budget shall post a public version of the re12 port on a text-based, searchable, and publicly available 

13 Internet Web site. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# RECEIVED MAY 1 7 

### 2010 Permits Office Air·3 U.S. EPA. Region 9 May 

### 13,2010 

# sierra research 1801 J Street 

### Mr. Gerardo Rios Sacramento, CA 95811 Chief, Permits Office USEPA Region 9 Tel: (916) 444-6666 Fax: (916) 444-8373 Ann Arbor, MI 75 Hawthorne Street Tel: (734) 761-6666 San Francisco, CA 94105 Fax: (734) 761-6755 Dear Mr. Rios: OnbehalfofAvenal Power Center, LLC: SierraResearch is submitting the enclosed digital modeling files which were produced 

### inthe analysis to demonstrate compliance with the I-hourN02 National Ambient Air Quality Standard. Please do not hesitate to call me ifyou have any questions. Very truly yours,

Eric Walther

cc:Jim Rexroad, Avenal Power Center, LLC JeffHol.mstead, Bracewell & Giuliani, LLP
#### WILSON v. UNITED STATES.

No. 13819.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Feb. 3, 1954.

Robert G. Closterman, Portland, Or., for appellant.

Henry L. Hess, U. S. Atty., Maurice V. Engelgau, Robert L. Dressier, Asst. U. S. Attys., Portland, Or., Richard Foster, Asst. U. S. Atty., E. Elmer Collett, Asst. U. S. Atty., Lynn J. Gillard, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and ORR and POPE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Wilson appeals from a judgment convicting him of possession of marihuana not having paid the transfer tax imposed by the Act of Congress of August 2, 1937, the same being the third offense in which he was convicted of violation of that Act.

He contends that there is no evidence to sustain the jury’s verdict. There is no merit in this contention, there being abundant evidence sustaining it.

Wilson further contends that the Act of Congress of November 2, 1951, I.R.C. § 2557(b), 26 U.S.C.A., is unconstitutional because ex post facto in character. This contention was decided by this court adversely to him upon Wilson’s petition for bail pending appeal, as appears in our opinion filed in Wilson v. United States, 9 Cir., 205 F.2d 567.

The judgment is affirmed.
Editorial Note on Part 226
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 226 appear at 70 FR 43261, July 27, 2005.

§ 226.5 Donation of commodities. ( a ) USDA foods available under section 6 of this Act, section 416 of the Agricultural Act of 1949 (7 U.S.C. 1431) or purchased under section 32 of the Act of August 24, 1935 (7 U.S.C. 1431), section 709 of the Food and Agriculture Act of 1965 (7 U.S.C. 1446a-1), or other authority, and donated by the Department shall be made available to each State.
( b ) The value of such commodities donated to each State for each school year shall be, at a minimum, the amount obtained by multiplying the number of reimbursable lunches and suppers served in participating institutions in that State during the preceding school year by the rate for commodities established under section 6(e) of the Act for the current school year. Adjustments shall be made at the end of each school year to reflect the difference between the number of reimbursable lunches and suppers served during the preceding year and the number served during the current year, and subsequent commodity entitlement shall be based on the adjusted meal counts. At the discretion of FNS, current-year adjustments may be made for significant variations in the number of reimbursable meals served. Such current-year adjustments will not be routine and will only be made for unusual problems encountered in a State, such as a disaster that necessitates institutional closures for a prolonged period of time. CACFP State agencies electing to receive cash-in-lieu of commodities will receive payments based on the number of reimbursable meals actually served during the current school year.
[47 FR 36527, Aug. 20, 1982, as amended at 62 FR 23618, May 1, 1997]
"VolunteersVital to Safe Haven "Submitted by: RosaSydneyGreenville, NC
(back)
July 18, 2000, marked a turning point for SAFE HAVEN when 18 youth participatedin our CIT (Counselor In Training) Orientation Workshop.
Volunteers were trained to provide good quality services to residentsand other agencies in the targeted area.  An instructor from the localuniversity gave instructions on leadership skills and trainees assistedwith target-area summer activities (swimming, arts and crafts, bowlingand skating).  Trainees also toured the city's Police Department spearheadedby Capt. C.J. Hardy - the Weed and Seed Site Coordinator.  The workshopconcluded with participants attending a movie having a pizza party.
Since the orientation workshop, volunteer contributions have increasedtremendously.  Volunteers have assisted with our Weed and Seed Day(9/26/2000), the Latin American Day Festival, and presently provide communityservice each Wednesday with the Food Bank of North Carolina.
Our volunteers are growing and we want them to know that they are becominga tower of strength and a strong force for progressive and efficient publicservice.
We salute Ms. Pamela Payton, our After School Counselor who providesguidance and mentoring to our youth.  She is a vital and effectiveforce in our staff.
The Counselor in Training workshop was sponsored by Alonza Price, Parksand Recreation Supervisor, Russell William, Manager of Office Depot, andthe Weed and Seed Safe Haven.
E-mail Greenville Weedand Seed for more information.Related Sites:
        SteeringCommitte Hosts Annual Meeting CommunityPolicing in Greenville, NCThis document was last update on November 24, 2000
Plant Name State

ORIS ID Boiler ID

SO2 Allocation 2016 (tons)

NOx AnAllocat2016 (to

Platte Nebraska 59 1 2,220 Gerald Whelan Energy Center Nebraska 60 1 1,722 Canaday Nebraska 2226 1 82 Lon D Wright Power Plant Nebraska 2240 50T 2 Lon D Wright Power Plant Nebraska 2240 8 1,350 C W Burdick Nebraska 2241 B-3 0 C W Burdick Nebraska 2241 GT-2 2 C W Burdick Nebraska 2241 GT-3 2 J Street Nebraska 2250 1 0 Hallam Nebraska 2265 1 4 Hebron Nebraska 2266 1 2 McCook Nebraska 2271 1 2 Sheldon Nebraska 2277 1 2,309 Sheldon Nebraska 2277 2 2,544 Jones Street Nebraska 2290 1 1 Jones Street Nebraska 2290 2 1 North Omaha Station Nebraska 2291 1 1,310 North Omaha Station Nebraska 2291 2 1,784 North Omaha Station Nebraska 2291 3 1,784 North Omaha Station Nebraska 2291 4 2,064 North Omaha Station Nebraska 2291 5 3,645 Sarpy County Nebraska 2292 1 5 Sarpy County Nebraska 2292 2 5 Sarpy County Station Nebraska 2292 CT3 1 Sarpy County Station Nebraska 2292 CT4A 0 Sarpy County Station Nebraska 2292 CT4B 0 Sarpy County Station Nebraska 2292 CT5A 0 Sarpy County Station Nebraska 2292 CT5B 0 Gerald Gentleman Station Nebraska 6077 1 13,780 Gerald Gentleman Station Nebraska 6077 2 15,116 Nebraska City Station Nebraska 6096 1 12,313 Nebraska City Station Nebraska 6096 2 3,377 Rokeby Nebraska 6373 1 2 Rokeby Nebraska 6373 2 0 Rokeby Nebraska 6373 3 0 Terry Bundy Generating Station Nebraska 7887 SVGS2 0 Terry Bundy Generating Station Nebraska 7887 SVGS3 1 

Complete Allocations 
Plant Name State

ORIS ID Boiler ID

SO2 Allocation 2016 (tons)

NOx AnAllocat2016 (to

Terry Bundy Generating Station Nebraska 7887 SVGS4 0 Beatrice Nebraska 8000 1 1 Beatrice Nebraska 8000 2 1 Cass County Station Nebraska 55972 CT1 0 Cass County Station Nebraska 55972 CT2 0 

Complete Allocations
Docket No. FAA-20i 1- D03:2..

Record of Ex Parte Contacts

pl.C/O -NJA-.236-/1dJ

Directorate Identifier: -AD

With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder,

manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, de)? (You might need to submit a separate

record to the Rules Docket. The AD Manual defines "Ex Parte (Jon/acts. 'j'-

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE RESPONSE

ATA Mark Lopez 9/8/2010 Concur.

OtherJAdditionallnfonnation:
#### § 2500.109 Program requirements.

Grants and cooperative agreements under this subpart shall address the priorities in the Department that involve providing outreach and technical assistance to socially disadvantaged farmers, ranchers, and forest landowners to own and operate farms and participate equitably in agricultural programs; and other priorities as determined by the Secretary.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-40295

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

ELEAZAR GARZA-PEREZ,

Defendant -Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:13-CR-475-1

Before JOLLY, BARKSDALE, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Eleazar Garza-Perez challenges the 60-month sentence imposed 

following his guilty-plea conviction for possession, with intent to distribute,

171 kilograms of marijuana, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 and 21 U.S.C. 

§§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1). Federal Border Patrol Agents arrested Garza and his 

brother for procuring and transporting the marijuana to a farm in McAllen, 

Texas. Garza asserts the court erred in denying his motion for a sentence 

* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. 

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 30, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 14-40295 Document: 00512921019 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/30/2015
No. 14-40295

reduction under the safety-valve provision in Sentencing Guidelines §§ 5C1.2

(permitting district court to impose sentence below statutory minimum) and 

2D1.1(b)(17) (decrease calculation by two levels for satisfaction of safety-valve 

provision). He contends he was truthful with the court in claiming he had not 

sought his brother’s assistance in transporting the drugs.

Although post-Booker, the Guidelines are advisory only, and a properly 

preserved objection to an ultimate sentence is reviewed for reasonableness 

under an abuse-of-discretion standard, the district court must still properly 

calculate the advisory Guidelines-sentencing range for use in deciding on the 

sentence to impose. Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). In that 

respect, for issues preserved in district court, its application of the Guidelines 

is reviewed de novo; its factual findings, only for clear error. E.g., United States 

v. Cisneros-Gutierrez, 517 F.3d 751, 764 (5th Cir. 2008). The decision whether 

to apply the safety-valve provision is reviewed for clear error. United States v. 

McCrimmon, 443 F.3d 454, 457 (5th Cir. 2006).

The safety-valve provision, in relevant part, requires defendant, at or 

before sentencing, to provide the Government with all the information and 

evidence he has concerning the offense. U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2(a)(5). After 

considering Garza’s assertions, the court found his statements were not 

credible. For obvious reasons, that finding is entitled to deference. E.g., United 

States v. Juarez-Duarte, 513 F.3d 204, 208 (5th Cir. 2008). And, because that 

finding is plausible in view of the record as a whole, it is not clearly erroneous. 

E.g., United States v. Ruiz, 621 F.3d 390, 396 (5th Cir. 2010) (citation omitted). 

AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 14-40295 Document: 00512921019 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/30/2015
#### § 28.65 Provisions for reviews.

Reviews of classifications or comparisons represented by Form A or D memoranda or Form C certificates shall be governed by § 28.66.
EXHIBIT 13.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of China Resources Development,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Tam Cheuk Ho, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Tam Cheuk Ho

Tam Cheuk Ho
Chief Financial Officer
June 9, 2006
###### Editorial Note on Part 1951

#### Editorial Notes:

1. Some of the exhibits referenced in this part 1951 are not published in the Code of Federal Regulations. Exhibits are available in any Rural Development office.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1951 appear at 80 FR 9890-9894, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1951.702 Definitions.

As used in this subpart, the following definitions apply:

*Active borrower.* A borrower who has an outstanding account in the records of the Office of the Deputy Chief Financial Officer (ODCFO), including collection-only or an unsatisfied account balance where a voluntary conveyance was accepted without release from liability of foreclosure did not satisfy the indebtedness.

*Assistance.* Finance assistance in the form of a loan, grant, or subsidy received.

*Debt instrument.* Used as a collective term to include promissory note, assumption agreement, grant agreement, or bond.

*False information.* Information, known to be incorrect, provided with the intent to obtain benefits which would not have been obtainable based on correct information.

*Inaccurate information.* Incorrect information provided inadvertently without intent to obtain benefits fraudulently.

*Inactive borrower.* A former borrower whose loan(s) has been paid in full or assumed by another party(ies) and who does not have an outstanding account in the records of the ODCFO.

*Recipient.* “Recipient” refers to an individual or entity that received a loan, or portion of a loan, an interest subsidy, a grant, or a portion of a grant which was unauthorized.

*Rural Development.* A mission area within the U.S. Department of Agriculture consisting of the Office of the Under Secretary for Rural Development, Office of Community Development, Rural Business-Cooperative Service, Rural Housing Service, and Rural Utilities Service and their successors.

*Unauthorized assistance.* Any loan, interest subsidy, grant, or portion thereof received by a recipient for which there was no regulatory authorization or for which the recipient was not eligible. Interest subsidy includes subsidy benefits received because a loan was closed at a lower interest rate than that to which the recipient was entitled, whether the incorrect interest rate was selected erroneously by the approval official or the documents were prepared in error.
#### Cowan *vs.*Montgomery.

chancer*. Case 96

Error to the Lincoln Circuit; l> ridges, Judge.

*Jurisdiction. Practice.*Waiver,

Cau3e of ttc tion transitory* . 0f the county 'rh.ich de¡.¡¿|es jj.(3 ju_ nsdicti- n; ^nles®epTM“®13s the county in which suit *300is commenced ; or unless defendant, by his appearance and answer or agreement waive objecti .ri« to jurisdicuon, no allegations of the com.-Iainanl’s bill can give jurisdiction. The. court cannot take the bill for confessed, nor make-any eider upon defendants until juiisr iction is obtained-

*299May 1.

Chief Justice Robfktson

delivered the opinion of the court.

A: ontgomerf brought a suit in chancery in the Lincoln circuit court, against Cowan fora settlement of partnership accounts. The subpoena was served on Cowan in Pulaski county. " He never appeared. The bill alleged that he had agreed, in writing, prior to the institution of the suit, that it might *be*brought in the Lincoln circuit court. The bilí was taken for confessed; and thereupon the circuit court decreed that Cowan should pay to Montgomery $183 50. , '

Waiving other obligations to the decree, the want of jurisdiction is fatal to it.

As the cause of complaint was transitory, the Lineoln circuit court had no jurisdiction, unless process had been served in Lincoln, or unless Cowan had, by an answer or otherwise, waived objection to'the want of jurisdiction. As he did not appear, we cannot perceive how the alleged agreement to *300allow the Lincoln circuit court to adjudicate could give it jurisdiction. .That agreement, if ever made, was prior to the institution of the suit, and could not, *per*se, confer jurisdiction.

Owsley, for plaintiff; Monroe, *Cunningham*and' Harlan, for defendant.

Moreover, before such an agreement would hav® any effect as an estoppel (even it it could so operate under any circumstances) it should be proved as admitted — and before the court could hear proof or take the bill for confessed, jurisdiction of the case was indispensable. Jurisdiction could not have been derived from thé alleged agreement, because the court had no right to take the bill for confessed, or to notice the agreement until jurisdiction to adjudicate in the case had been conferred.

Wherefore, the decree of the circuit court is reversed, and the cause is remanded, with instructions to dismiss the bill for want of jurisdiction.
#### § 1900.7 Effect on other regulations.

This subpart does not revoke or modify any other delegation or redelegation, instruction, procedure, or regulation issued by, or under authority of, the Under Secretary for Rural Development.

[44 FR 18162, Mar. 27, 1979. Redesignated at 55 FR 43325, Oct. 29, 1990, and further redesignated at 59 FR 43441, Aug. 24, 1994, as amended at 80 FR 9867, Feb. 24, 2015]
#### § 220.12 Competitive food services.

School food authorities must comply with the competitive food service and standards requirements specified in § 210.11 of this chapter.

[78 FR 39093, June 28, 2013]
MEM O RANDUM

TO: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutan ts Residual Risk and Technology

Review for Flexible Polyurethane Foam Production

- Docket No. EPA

- HQ

- O A R

- 0510
FROM: J. Kaye Whitfield, USEPA
DATE: August 1, 2014
SUBJECT: Late Docket Entries
On July 29, 2014 , EPA’s Administrator signed the final rule titled, “ National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants Residual Risk and Technology Review for Flexible Polyurethane Foam Production

. ” On that date , all materials comprising the administrative record for the NESHAP were complete and final . However, staff did not enter f ive documents and seven appendices into the rulemaking docket ( EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2012

- 0510 ) until July 30, 2014, the day following signature of the final

ru le

. The items in question are listed below : 1) FPUF Prod Final Rule Amendatory Text REDLINE 2) FPUF Prod Final Rule Flex Foam Production Comment Summary Response 3) FPUF Production Final Rule ICR Supporting Statement 4) FPUF Production Final Rule Environmental Justice Review 5) FPUF Production Final Rule Risk Assessment6) FPUF Production Final Rule Risk Assessment Appendices 1

- 7.

All of these items were complete at the time of signature and were not subsequently modified

. 

### The late entry of these items in no way affected any of the decisions in promulgating the final rule.
# [

Page 1 of 1 

# ] End of Safety Data Sheet
Editorial Note on Part 1948
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1948 appear at 80 FR 9888, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1948.70 Designation approval. Upon receipt of a request for approval of a designation made under this section, the Secretary of Energy shall: ( a ) Determine to the best of his ability the consistency of the supporting data submitted along with the designation by the Governor;
( b ) Confer with Rural Development on approval;
( c ) Notify the Governor and the Under Secretary for Rural Development of action taken on each designation within 30 calendar days of the receipt of a request for approval;
( d ) Consult with the Governor before the disapproval of any designation; and
( e ) Publish a description in the Federal Register of all designated areas approved within 30 days of their approval.