alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 7231]

The U.S. National Commission for UNESCO will hold a meeting on Wednesday, December 1, 2010, from 10 a.m. until 12:45 p.m. Eastern Time at the U.S. Department of State, with the option of participation by telephone conference. The open session will have a series of subject-specific reports, during which the Commission will accept brief oral comments or questions from the public or media. The open session is expected to be two hours and forty-five minutes in duration. The public comment period will be limited to approximately 15 minutes in total, with two minutes allowed per speaker.

The second portion of the meeting will be closed to the public to allow the Commission to discuss applications for the UNESCO Associated Schools Network Program and the UNESCO Club Network. The closed session will begin at 12:45 p.m. This portion of the call will be closed to the public pursuant to Section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6) because it is likely to involve discussion of information of a personal and financial nature regarding the relative merits of individual applicants where disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.

For more information or to arrange to participate in the open portion of the the meeting, individuals must make arrangements with the Executive Secretariat of the National Commission by November 29, 2010.

                    The National Commission may be contacted via e-mail at                     *DCUNESCO@state.gov,*                     or via phone at (202) 663-0026. Its Web site can be accessed at:                     *http://www.state.gov/​p/​io/​unesco/​.*

Dated: November 9, 2010.

Elizabeth Kanick,

Executive Director, U.S. National Commission for UNESCO, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2010-29128 Filed 11-17-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-19-P
#### The State ex rel. Ronan, Appellee and Cross-Appellant, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellants and Cross-Appellees.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Ronan v. Indus. Comm.*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 386.]

(No. 97-2245

Submitted August 19, 1998

Decided October 14, 1998.)

*Law Offices of Larry Hotchkiss*and *Scott*A *Bravi; Law Office of Thomas Tootle*and *Thomas Tootle,*for appellee and cross-appellant.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Craigg E. Gould,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellant and cross-appellee Industrial Commission.

*Gibson & Robbins-Penniman*and *Corrine S. Carman,*for appellant and crossappellee city of Newark.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Moyer, C.J., and Cook, J., dissent.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION
 CERTIFICATION OF MICHAEL A. CREEL, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF EPE HOLDINGS, LLC, THE GENERAL PARTNER OF
ENTERPRISE GP HOLDINGS L.P.
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 /s/ Michael A. CreelName:
    Michael A. CreelTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer of EPE Holdings, LLC
on behalf of Enterprise GP Holdings L.P.
#### *Ward vs. Prather’s Adm'r.*

Swre Facias.

Case 2.

Error to the Clarke Circuit; George Shannon, Judge.

*Variance. Nul tiel record.*Judgments.

January 16.

It is sufficient for a *scire fa~*ciastooontain such recitals as will point *5to the judgment intended to be revived, with such certainty, that the defendant must know what judgment is meant. Clause subjoined to the judgment, that each party pay their own costs, need not be recited in the *scire*facias.

*4Judge Underwood

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Ward sued out a writof *scire facias*to revive a judgment of the Clarke circuit court rendered against the intestate of the defendants. The plea of nul tiel record was filed and issue made up thereon. The court decided that the record offered in evidence was not the same set out in the *scire*facias, and there*5upon gave judgment for the defendants. Exceptions were taken, and althbughthe amount of the judgment sought to be revived, is only *seventy-five,*cents, the case has been brought up for revision. The judgment in the court below, was rendered upon and in pursuance to an award which directed a division of the costs between the litigants ; and in entering the judgment for the seventy-five cents, these words are added, “ and that the costs herein expended be equally borne by the parties.” The *scire facias*is silent in respect to the costs disposed of as above, and on that account the variance was adjudged fatal by the court below. We do not consider it necessary in a *jscire facias*to copy literally and fully the judgment, and every order immediately connected therewith. We are of opinion, that if the *scire facias*contains such recitals as will point to the judgment intended to be revived, with such certainty that the defendants in the *scire facias**must know what judgment is meant, it is sufficient. Now in this case, there is an exact coincidence between the record offered in evidence and the recitals in the *scire facias as*it regards the parties, the court, the *date of the*judgment, *its*having been entered upon an award, and its amount. Such an agreement could leave no doubt on the mind as to the judgment intended to be revived; and we cannot perceive what good could have resulted from copying in the *scire*facias, the above sentence in respect to the costs, or how the omission to copy it, could have mislead or prejudiced the defendants. We are therefore constrained to say, that there was such a substantial correspondencc-and agreement between the *scire facias*and record offered in evidence, that judgment should have been rendered for the plaintiff.

The judgment *of*the *court*below, is therefore reversed, and the cause remanded, with directions to enter judgment for the plaintiff, upon the issue found.

The plaintiff in error is entitled to his costs in this court.
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.39


                       AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


         This Amendment to the Employment Agreement by and among Meadowbrook,
Inc., and Meadowbrook Insurance Group, Inc., (hereinafter referred to as the
"Company"), and Merton J. Segal (hereinafter referred to as the "Executive")
(hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement") is made effective this 1st day of
April, 2005.

         WHEREAS, the Company, Meadowbrook and Executive executed the Agreement
effective January 1, 2004; and

         WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the Agreement.

         NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION of the premises and the mutual
covenants contained herein, the parties agree to amend the Agreement as set
forth below and except as provided below, the provisions of the Agreement, as
previously amended, shall remain in effect:

Section 2 -- Responsibilities and Duties is amended as follows:

         2.    RESPONSIBILITIES AND DUTIES. The Executive shall be employed as
         the Company's Chairman or in such other position(s) and with such
         responsibilities and duties as the Board of Directors of the Company
         may from time to time determine. The Executive shall devote the time
         required of him by the Board of Directors to perform his duties and
         responsibilities hereunder.


Section 3 -- Compensation, subsection A is amended as follows:

         (A)      BASE SALARY. A base salary of $31,250 per month. Such Base
                  Salary shall be payable in accordance with the normal payroll
                  practices of the Company then in effect. Any increases in the
                  Base Salary shall be determined by the Board of Directors of
                  the Company after review and recommendation of the
                  Compensation Committee.



<PAGE>


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the
date first written above.


                                        MEADOWBROOK INSURANCE GROUP, INC.

                                        By:            /s/ Robert S. Cubbin
                                           -------------------------------------

                                        Its: President & Chief Executive Officer


                                        MEADOWBROOK, INC.

                                        By:            /s/ Robert S. Cubbin
                                           -------------------------------------

                                        Its: President & Chief Executive Officer

                                        EXECUTIVE

                                                       /s/ Merton J. Segal
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Merton J. Segal
1

Tanis M. Holm

EDMISTON & COLTON LAW FIRM

310 Grand Avenue

Billings, MT 59101

Telephone: (406) 259-9986

Facsimile: (406) 259-1094

E-Mail: tholm@yellowstonelaw.com

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

In re: 3M Combat Arms Earplug

Products Liability Litigation

This Document Relates to:

West, 3:20-cv-05182

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 3:19-md-2885-MCR-GRJ

MOTION TO APPEAR PRO 

HAC VICE

Pursuant to Pretrial Order No. 3, Case Management Order 1, and the Northern 

District of Florida Local Rule 11.1, Tanis M. Holm hereby moves this Court for an 

Order for admission to practice pro hac vice in the above-styled case, and in support 

thereof state as follows:

1. Movant resides in Montana and is not a resident of the State of Florida.

2. Movant is admitted to practice and is a member in good standing of the 

State Bar of Montana. A copy of the Certificate of Good Standing from the State Bar 

of Montana (the jurisdiction where I reside and regularly practice law) dated within 

30 days of this motion is attached hereto as Exhibit A and made a part hereof.

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3704 Filed 03/20/23 Page 1 of 3
2

3. Pursuant to Pretrial Order No. 3 and Local Rule 11.1, Movant has 

successfully completed both the online Local Rules tutorial exam, confirmation 

number FLND1679089983270, and the CM/ECF online tutorial.

4. Movant has submitted to the Clerk the required $208.00 pro hac vice

admission fee.

5. Movant has upgraded her PACER account to “NextGen” and verified 

it is not a firm account but an individual account.

6. Upon approval of Movant’s Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Movant 

will be filing a Notice of Appearance to become attorney of record in the related 

case West v. 3M, et al., Civil Action No. 3:20-cv-05182.

WHEREFORE, Tanis M. Holm respectfully requests that this Court enter an 

Order granting this motion to appear pro hac vice, and directing the clerk to provide 

notice of Electronic Case Filings to the undersigned.

Dated this 20th day of March, 2023.

By: /s/ Tanis M. Holm

Tanis M. Holm

EDMISTON & COLTON LAW FIRM

310 Grand Avenue

Billings, MT 59101

Telephone: (406) 259-9986

Facsimile: (406) 259-1094

E-Mail: tholm@yellowstonelaw.com

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3704 Filed 03/20/23 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that the foregoing Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice was 

filed electronically with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system on March 20, 

2023, and served electronically on all counsel of record.

Dated this 20th day of March, 2023.

By: /s/ Tanis M. Holm

Tanis M. Holm

EDMISTON & COLTON LAW FIRM

310 Grand Avenue

Billings, MT 59101

Telephone: (406) 259-9986

Facsimile: (406) 259-1094

E-Mail: tholm@yellowstonelaw.com

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3704 Filed 03/20/23 Page 3 of 3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

######  Customs and Border Protection

# AGENCY:

U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security.

# ACTION:

Notice of accreditation of SEA, Ltd., as a commercial laboratory.

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12, SEA, Ltd., 7349 Worthington-Galena Road, Columbus, OH 43085, has been accredited to test petroleum and petroleum products for customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory analyses should request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is accredited by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific test requested. Alternatively, inquires regarding the specific test this entity is accredited to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to                         *cbp.labhq@dhs.gov.*                         Please reference the Web site listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories.                         *http://cbp.gov/​xp/​cgov/​import/​operations_​support/​labs_​scientific_​svcs/​commercial_​gaugers/​.*

# DATES:

The accreditation of SEA, Ltd., as commercial laboratory became effective on June 22, 2010. The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for June 2013.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Anthony Malana, Laboratories and Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-1060.

Dated: November 8, 2010.

 Ira S. Reese,

Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.

[FR Doc. 2010-29177 Filed 11-18-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
EXHIBIT 23.1



    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

      We  consent  to  the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the
registration  statements (File Nos. 333-117896,  333-103467,  33-
15894, and No. 33-15895) on Form S-8 of Werner Enterprises,  Inc.
of  our  reports  dated February 26, 2010, with  respect  to  the
consolidated  balance  sheets  of Werner  Enterprises,  Inc.  and
subsidiaries  as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and  the  related
consolidated  statements  of  income,  stockholders'  equity  and
comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2009, and related  financial
statement  schedule,  and the effectiveness of  internal  control
over  financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, which  reports
appear  in  the December 31, 2009 annual report on Form  10-K  of
Werner Enterprises, Inc.

                                             KPMG LLP

Omaha, Nebraska
February 26, 2010
Appeal No. 79-248.

#### John Altieri *et al. v.*John Dolan *et al.*

*Temkin, Merolla*6- *Zurier, Barry J. Kusinitz,*for plaintiffs, *Thomas L. Marcaccio, Jr.,*for defendants.

The litigants were before us on December 7, 1979, as we considered a motion by the defendants for a summary dismissal of the plaintiffs’ appeal from the Superior Court decision that denied their request for injunctive relief. The dispute concerns the erection of a fence by the defendants in an area that once served as a common driveway between the respective properties of the parties. The dismissal motion was filed pursuant to the pertinent provisions of Supreme Court Rule 16(g).

After consideration of the issue presented by the plaintiffs and the various contentions espoused at oral argument, the defendants’ motion is denied and dismissed.
98-1763.

#### Foster v. Huffman.

In Habeas Corpus. *Sua sponte,*cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
F a c t Sh e e t 

FY 2000 Resource Enhancements

6/00

Prepared by the Office of Public Affairs • Immigration & Naturalization Service • (202) 514-2648

Northern Border and Coastal

Border Patrol Staffing for Northern Border and Coastal Sectors –

Location Current

*Staff

Increase Total Percent

Increase

 Spokane Sector Agents 34 3 37 9%

Support 11 – 11 –

 Detroit Sector Agents 34 4 38 11%

Support 12 – 12 –

 Buffalo Sector Agents 33 3 36 9%

Support 10 – 10 –

 Grand Forks Sector Agents 27 2 29 7%

Support 10 – 10 –

 Swanton Sector Agents 76 4 80 5%

Support 19 – 19 –

 Havre Sector Agents 28 2 30 3%

Support 12 – 12 –

 Blaine Sector Agents 45 2 47 5%

Support 15 – 15 –

 Miami Sector Agents 55 5 60

Support 16 – 16 –

Total Agents 332 25 357 9%

Support 105 – 105 –

* On-board staffing as of 6/3/00.
Second Amendment to Trust Agreement



 Exhibit 10.12b 
  
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO TRUST AGREEMENT BETWEEN 
 FIDELITY MANAGEMENT TRUST COMPANY AND 
 FMC CORPORATION 
  
 THIS SECOND AMENDMENT, effective as of the first day of January, 2004, except
as otherwise stated herein, by and between Fidelity Management Trust Company (the “Trustee”) and FMC Corporation (the “Sponsor”); 
  
 WITNESSETH: 
  
 WHEREAS, the Trustee and the Sponsor heretofore entered into a Trust Agreement dated and restated September 28, 2001, with regard to the FMC Corporation
Nonqualified Savings and Investment Plan (the “Plan”); and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Trustee and the Sponsor now desire to amend said Trust Agreement as provided for in Section 16 thereof: 
  
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the above premises, the Trustee and the Sponsor hereby amend the Trust Agreement by: 
  

	 	(1)	Amending the “investment options” section of Schedule “A” to add the following: 

  

	 	•	 	PIMCO Emerging Companies Fund – Institutional Class 

  

	 	•	 	Royce Special Equity Fund 

  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Trustee and the Sponsor have caused this Second Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized officers effective as of the day
and year first above written. 
  

											
	FMC CORPORATION	  	        FIDELITY MANAGEMENT TRUST COMPANY
						
	By:	 	[/s/ John Thompson	 	12/3/2003	  	        By:	 	[/s/ Rebecca Hays-Ethier	 	17/30/03
	 	 	
	  	 	 	

	 	 	 	 	Date	  	 	 	FMTC Authorized Signatory	 	Date
#### § 28.117 Fee for new memorandum or certificate.

For each new memorandum or certificate issued in substitution for a prior memorandum or certificate at the request of the holder, thereof, on account of the breaking or splitting of the lot of cotton covered thereby or otherwise for his business convenience, the person requesting such substitution shall pay a fee determined as described in § 28.116. If the memorandum is provided by electronic means, the fee shall be determined using the same provisions.

[79 FR 67319, Nov. 13, 2014]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCTS

Case No. 3:19md2885

LIABILITY LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

Baker, 7:20cv39

Judge M. Casey Rodgers

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones

DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS ORDER NO. 14

This Order addresses Plaintiff’s objections and counter-designations to 

Defendants’ affirmative deposition designations and Defendants’ objections to 

Plaintiff’s counter-designations thereto for the following witness depositions:

1. Hobbs, Brian (2020-07-16)

SO ORDERED, on this 15th day of June, 2021.

M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 7:20-cv-00039-MCR-GRJ Document 173 Filed 06/15/21 Page 1 of 1
§ 28.306 Over
13 ⁄ 16 inch staple. Cotton which is more than thirteen-sixteenths of an inch in length of staple but is not exactly one of the measurements specified in § 28.302, shall be designated by that one of such measurements which comes nearest under its true measurement. [22 FR 10930, Dec. 28, 1957. Redesignated at 49 FR 28391, July 12, 1984]
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 21


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF INTERLEAF, INC.


1.  Avalanche Development Company

2.  Interleaf Australia Pty. Ltd.

3.  Interleaf Benelux, N.V./S.A.

4.  Interleaf Canada, Inc.

5.  Interleaf Foreign Sales Corp.

6.  Interleaf France, S.A.

7.  Interleaf GmbH

8.  Interleaf Japan, Inc.

9.  Interleaf Securities Corp.

10. Interleaf Switzerland, S.A.

11. Interleaf U.K. Ltd.

12. Interleaf World Trade, Inc.

13. PDR Automated Systems and Publications, Inc.

14. Interleaf Italia S.r.l.
#### Harry F. Matheson, Appellant, v. Joy-Kar Taxi, Inc., et al., Respondents.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated June 6, 1968, which denied his motion for reconsideration of a prior denial of a trial preference. Order reversed, on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and trial preference granted. In our opinion, the fact that plaintiff received public assistance from the Nassau County Department of Public Welfare prior to his accident, and the fact that there is no causal relationship between his welfare status and his accident, should not, in and of themselves, deprive him of a trial preference based on indigency. To require .that there be a causal connection between plaintiff’s indigency and the incident resulting in the cause of action would be to establish an inflexible rule somewhat at odds with the “ interests of justice ” basis for granting a trial preference (see CPLR 3403, subd. [a], par. 3). The “interests of justice ” warrant a .trial preference at bar. Christ, Acting F. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.