alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

DERIAN DOUGLAS HICKMAN, ) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Plaintiff, 

v. Civil Action No. U 9 2251 

UNITED STATES MINT, et al., 

Defendants. 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

This matter comes before the court on plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis 

and pro se civil complaint. The court will grant the application, and dismiss the complaint. 

Rule 8( a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint contain a short 

and plain statement ofthe grounds upon which the court's jurisdiction depends, a short and plain 

statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand for judgment 

for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). The purpose of the minimum standard of 

Rule 8 is to give fair notice to the defendants of the claim being asserted, sufficient to prepare a 

responsive answer, to prepare an adequate defense and to detennine whether the doctrine of res 

judicata applies. Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). 

Plaintiff appears to demand compensation from the United States Mint, the Internal 

Revenue Service, the United States Tax Court and the Department of Justice for business losses 

he has suffered. As drafted, the Complaint fails to comply with Rule 8(a) as it includes no 

statement showing that the plaintiff is entitled to the relief he seeks. Accordingly, the Court will 

dismiss the complaint without prejudice. An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion 
will be issued on this same date. 

6d:~.~ United States District Judge
-79 -78 -77 -76 -75

 39

 40

 41

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲

▲

▲

▲

 1000

 1500

 2000

 1000

18 12 06 00

08/07

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 07 Aug 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter C of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter C appear by Amdt. 381, 65 FR 64586, Oct. 30, 2000.

###### Editorial Note on Part 273

#### Editorial Notes:

1. OMB control numbers relating to this part 273 are contained in § 271.8.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 273 appear at 84 FR 15093, Apr. 15, 2019.

#### § 273.30 Transitional benefit alternative change reporting requirements.

If the household does report changes in its circumstances during the transitional period, the State agency may make the change effective the month following the last month of the transitional period or invite the household to reapply and be certified to receive benefits. However, in order to prevent duplicate participation, the State agency must act to change the household's transitional benefit when a household member moves out of the household and either reapplies as a new household or is reported as a new member of another household. Moreover, the State agency must remove any income, resources and deductible expenses clearly attributable to the departing member.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 7233]

A meeting of the Advisory Committee on International Law will take place on Thursday, December 9, 2010, from 9:30 a.m. to approximately 5:30 p.m., at the George Washington University Law School (Michael K. Young Faculty Conference Center, 5th Floor), 2000 H St., NW., Washington, DC. The meeting will be chaired by the Legal Adviser of the Department of State, Harold Hongju Koh, and will be open to the public up to the capacity of the meeting room. It is anticipated that the agenda of the meeting will cover a range of current international legal topics, including international piracy; sovereign immunity of foreign government officials; U.N. resolutions and fundamental rights under European Union law; contemporary issues in the law of armed conflict; transnational environmental issues; and corporate social responsibility. Members of the public will have an opportunity to participate in the discussion.

Members of the public who wish to attend the session should, by Friday, December 3, 2010, notify the Office of the Legal Adviser (telephone: 202-776-8451) of their name, professional affiliation, address, and telephone number. A valid photo ID is required for admittance. A member of the public who needs reasonable accommodation should make his or her request by December 2, 2010; requests made after that time will be considered but might not be possible to accommodate.

      ( print page 70962)    
Dated: November 15, 2010.

Danielle Morris,

Office of Claims and Investment Disputes, Office of the Legal Adviser, Executive Director, Advisory Committee on International Law, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2010-29229 Filed 11-18-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
#### §§ 1738.256-1738.300 [Reserved]
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Working Virtually With Families of LGBTQ+ Youth.      

# Resource: Working Virtually With Families of LGBTQ+ Youth.

This tip sheet (PDF, 1 page) provides information about working virtually with families of youth who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, questioning, or other diverse identity, including ideas for initial engagement and rapport building. **Learn more.**
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENSACOLA DIVISION 

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCTS

 Case No. 3:19md2885 

LIABILITY LITIGATION 

This Document Relates to: 

Wilkerson, 7:20cv35 

 

Judge M. Casey Rodgers 

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones 

DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS ORDER NO. 2 

This Order addresses Defendants’ objections and counter-designations to 

Plaintiff’s affirmative deposition designations and Plaintiff’s objections to 

Defendants’ counter-designations thereto for the following witness deposition: 

1. Wilkerson, Brandy (11/1/2021) 

SO ORDERED this 3rd day of March, 2022. 

 M. CASEY RODGERS 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 7:20-cv-00035-MCR-GRJ Document 121 Filed 03/03/22 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 10.38
 MERIDIAN BIOSCIENCE, INC.
2004 EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN
 RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD AGREEMENT
TIME-BASED
 Summary of Restricted Stock Award Grant
  Name of Grantee:Number of Shares:Grant Date:
    
    11/12/2009
    
    
    
    :Vesting Date:
    
    11/12/2013
 Terms of Agreement
 1. Grant of Restricted Stock Awards.
 2. Vesting of Restricted Shares.




---



##### 



3. Forfeiture of Restricted Shares.
 4. Payment.
   5. Restrictive Legend.
 6. Transferability.
 7. Dividend, Voting and Other Rights.
 8. Continuous Employment.
 9. No Employment Contract.




---



##### 



10. Relation to Other Benefits.
 11. Taxes and Withholding.
 12. Adjustments.
 13. Compliance with Law. provided, however,
 14. Amendments.
 15. Compliance with Section 409A of the Code.
 16. Severability.
 17. Relation to Plan.




---



##### 



18. Successors and Assigns.
 19. Governing Law.
 20. Electronic Delivery.
  MERIDIAN BIOSCIENCE, INC.By:Name:
    Melissa LuekeTitle:
    Vice President, Chief Financial Officer www.meridianbioscience.com
Exhibit B

Plaintiff 

ID

Plaintiff Name Law Firm Name Active Docket 

Case Number

1 382741 Anderson, Robert Bernard Abraham, Watkins, Nichols, Sorrels, Agosto & Aziz 3:23‐cv‐00556

2 364267 Atkinson, Eric Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC 3:22‐cv‐16898

3 364614 Broadnax, David Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC 3:22‐cv‐17127

4 364759 Gray, Treston Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC 3:22‐cv‐17509

5 364643 Harrison, Elra Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC 3:22‐cv‐17252

6 371950 Holmes, Kenneth R Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC 3:22‐cv‐21227

7 364419 Horvath, David Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC 3:22‐cv‐16873

8 364735 Muhammad, Zavious Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC 3:22‐cv‐17344

9 364715 Sherman, Geoffrey Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC 3:22‐cv‐17244

10 364744 Tedford, Kenneth Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC 3:22‐cv‐17405

11 381773 Eaton, Christopher Michael Law Offices Of Donald G. Norris, A Law Corporation 3:23‐cv‐00039

12 279911 Jackson, Alisa T Milberg Coleman Bryson Phillips Grossman, Pllc 7:21‐cv‐18452

13 243667 Basham, Jason Nabers Law Firm, PLLC 8:20‐cv‐90770

14 369155 Currington, Andrew James Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP 3:22‐cv‐13850

15 369324 Ordonez, Justo Jay Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP 3:22‐cv‐13065

16 361404 Garner, Cedric Lamont Rappaport, Glass, Levine & Zullo LLP 3:22‐cv‐06382

17 365115 Cameron, Ryan Slater Slater Schulman LLP 3:22‐cv‐17954

18 379735 Gethers, Sam Slocumb Law 3:23‐cv‐00296

19 366623 Harrell, Jonathan David The Webster Law Firm 3:22‐cv‐10087

20 359747 Wooten, Stephen Tracey & Fox Law Firm 3:22‐cv‐03858

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3695-2 Filed 03/08/23 Page 1 of 1
Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3660 Filed 02/08/23 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3660 Filed 02/08/23 Page 2 of 2
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:96cr5LAC

WILLIE BRAZILE

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on August 29, 2006

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION TO RECONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR

WRIT OF AUDITA QUERELA PURSUANT TO THE ALL WRITS ACT, 28 USCA 1651 

Filed by DEFENDANT PRO SE on 8/17/2006 Doc.# 67

RESPONSES:

on Doc.# _________________

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Mary Maloy

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 30th day of

August, 2006, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) 

 s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 3:96-cr-00005-LC-CJK Document 68 Filed 08/30/06 Page 1 of 1
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Yurchiak, Appellant.

[Cite as *State v. Yurchiak*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 113.]

(Nos. 98-205 and 98-346

Submitted August 19, 1998

Decided September 16, 1998.)

*Dean Holman,*Medina County Prosecuting Attorney, and *Joseph F. Salzgeber,*Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

*Anthony J. Vegh,*for appellant. .

*114The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of *State v. Rush*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 53, 697 N.E.2d 634.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick; F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BOBBY DARRELL COLBERT, 

Applicant, 

 v. 

RON HAYNES, 

Respondent.

No. 20-73839 

MEMORANDUM*

Application to File Second or Successive

Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Submitted August 10, 2021**

Seattle, Washington

Before: BEA, BRESS, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Bobby Colbert applies for leave to file a second or successive federal habeas 

petition challenging his 2005 state conviction and sentence for rape. See Colbert v. 

Haynes, 954 F.3d 1232, 1234–35 (9th Cir. 2020). Colbert acknowledges that he 

cannot meet the standard for a second or successive petition, but argues that his 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

AUG 11 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 

petition is not actually a second or successive petition because a 2017 order that

changed his community custody (the “2017 Order”) effected a new judgment. The 

2017 Order changed his community custody on one count from a variable term to a 

fixed term, in compliance with a 2009 statutory amendment that prohibited 

variable terms. This reduced Colbert’s community custody on that count to a fixed 

term of 36 months instead of the prior variable range of 36 to 48 months. We deny 

the application.

A petition is not second or successive if it is the first petition to challenge a 

“new judgment.” Id. at 1235 (citation omitted). “Critical to this analysis is 

whether the [change in sentence] ‘replaces an invalid sentence with a valid one.’” 

Id. at 1236 (citation omitted). “In Washington, only sentencing errors stemming 

from a trial court exceeding its statutory authority render a sentencing judgment 

invalid.” Id. Because a variable custody term was lawful when the state court 

imposed it in 2005—four years before Washington’s statutory amendment 

requiring fixed terms—the 2005 judgment remains valid, and the 2017 Order did 

not create a new judgment.

Further, even if there were an error, “sentencing errors correctible through 

ministerial action . . . are not errors that render the original sentence invalid.” Id. 

“[R]eset[ting] the end date for community custody [is] a purely ministerial 

function,” as evidenced by the Washington legislature’s delegation to the 
3 

Department of Corrections of the power to modify community custody terms in 

accordance with the 2009 statutory amendment. State v. Franklin, 172 Wash. 2d 

831, 843 (2011) (en banc). 

For these reasons, the 2017 Order did not create a new judgment, and 

Colbert’s petition is therefore second or successive. Accordingly, Colbert must 

satisfy the requirements for filing a second or successive petition under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2244(b)(2), which he concedes that he does not do. Thus, Colbert’s application 

to file his petition is DENIED.
Order entered May 22, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 15 - 00361 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF N .E., A CHILD On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF - 12 - 13599 - Z



### O RDER Because this is an accelerated appeal from a decree terminating appellant’s parental rights, we GRANT appellant’s May 19, 2015 motion for additional time to file brief to the extent
we ORDER the brief be filed no later than June 11, 2015
. We caution app ellant that no further extensions will be granted absent exigent circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS PRESIDING JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

        <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information taken from the
balance sheet as of June 30, 2000 and the statement of operations for
the twelve-month period ended June 30, 2000, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       9,095,618
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,211,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                   230,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,076,918
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,076,918
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          561,782
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       303,668
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,211,468
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,076,918
<SALES>                                         52,690
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               851,814
<CGS>                                          142,417
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  142,417
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,557,472
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             399,128
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (848,076)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    19,950
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (828,126)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (828,126)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         185,681
<SECURITIES>                                    12,724
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,692
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    188,345
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               455,882
<PP&E>                                       2,049,272
<DEPRECIATION>                                 747,320
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,081,074
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          224,094
<BONDS>                                        585,009
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       424,538
<OTHER-SE>                                     707,517
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,081,074
<SALES>                                        768,455
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               794,926
<CGS>                                          476,090
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  600,931
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               120,657
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              43,987
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 74,572
<INCOME-TAX>                                    19,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             93,972
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    93,972
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.86


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

AND THE STATE OF FLORIDA, ex 

rel ROBERT V. SMITH,

 Qui Tam Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 3:20-cv-3678-MCR-ZCB

JAY A. ODOM, et al,

 Defendants.

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge M. Casey Rodgers on October 11, 2022

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE 

OPPOSITION

Filed by Plaintiff on October 10, 2022 Doc. # 60

 Stipulated Joint Pleading

 Unopposed Consented

JESSICA J. LYUBLANOVITS

CLERK OF COURT

/s/ Patricia G. Romero

Deputy Clerk: Patricia G. Romero

On consideration, the motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff’s deadline to file its 

opposition to Defendants’ motions (ECF Nos. 55, 57 and 58) is extended to October 

28, 2022.

DONE and ORDERED this 12th day of October 2022.

M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-03678-MCR-ZCB Document 61 Filed 10/12/22 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

vs. CASE NO. 3:96cr65/LAC

VIRGIL TALLEY

________________________________________________/

ORDER OF RECUSAL

The undersigned hereby recuses himself from this case.

ORDERED this 2nd day of November, 2007.

 s/L.A. Collier 

 LACEY A. COLLIER

 United States District Judge

Case 3:96-cr-00065-MCR-MD Document 664 Filed 11/02/07 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 21-1

THE NAVIGATORS GROUP, INC.  AND SUBSIDIARIES

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT AT DECEMBER 31, 2002

|Name                                              |  | Jurisdiction in
which organized
|------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------
|Navigators Insurance Company                      |  | New York                       
|NIC Insurance Company                             |  | New York                       
|Navigators Management Company, Inc.               |  | New York                       
|Navigators Insurance Services of Texas, Inc.      |  | Texas                          
|Navigators Special Risk, Inc.                     |  | Texas                          
|Navigators California Insurance Services, Inc.    |  | California                     
|Navigators Insurance Services of Washington, Inc. |  | Washington                     
|Navigators Management (UK) Ltd.                   |  | United Kingdom                 
|Navigators Corporate Underwriters Ltd.            |  | United Kingdom                 
|Navigators Holdings (UK) Ltd.                     |  | United Kingdom                 
|Navigators Underwriting Agency Ltd.               |  | United Kingdom                 
|Millennium Underwriting Ltd.                      |  | United Kingdom                 
|Pennine Underwriting Limited                      |  | United Kingdom                 

---

QuickLinks