alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
THE NAVIGATORS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
   ($ and shares in thousands, except per share data)
 Year Ended December 31,2009
    
    
    2008
    
    
    2007Net income applicable to common stock
    
    $
    63,158
    
    
    $
    51,692
    
    
    $
    95,620Average number of common shares outstanding
    
    
    16,935
    
    
    
    16,802
    
    
    
    16,812Net income per share  Basic
    
    $
    3.73
    
    
    $
    3.08
    
    
    $
    5.69Average number of common shares outstanding
    
    
    16,935
    
    
    
    16,802
    
    
    
    16,812Add: Assumed exercise of stock options
and vesting
of stock grants
    
    
    387
    
    
    
    190
    
    
    
    193Common and common equivalent shares
outstanding
    
    
    17,322
    
    
    
    16,992
    
    
    
    17,005Net income per share  Diluted
    
    $
    3.65
    
    
    $
    3.04
    
    
    $
    5.62
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:95cr03093-01/LAC

CHARLES J. SPIGNER

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on May 19, 2009 

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.

§3582(c)(2) AND AMENDMENT 706 AND 711 THAT ARE RETROACTIVE OF CRACK

COCAINE UNDER U.S.S.G. 

Filed by DEFENDANT on 4/27/2009 Doc.# 243

RESPONSES:

 NONE on Doc.# 

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

 Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Jerry Marbut

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Jerry Marbut

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 19th day of

May, 2009, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) See Doc 189. 

 s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge

Case 3:95-cr-03093-LC-CJK Document 244 Filed 05/19/09 Page 1 of 1
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: November 2, 2005
    
    /s/ Thomas DeeryThomas Deery, Chief Executive OfficerDate: November 2, 2005
    
    /s/ Brian CarterBrian Carter, Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of China Natural Resources, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I,Yue Ming Wai Bonaventure, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Yue Ming Wai Bonaventure

Yue Ming Wai Bonaventure

Chief Financial Officer

April 28, 2016

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Felix Cosme, Appellant, v Town of Islip et al., Respondents. (Action No. 1.) Felix Cosme, Appellant, v Gregory Munson et al., Respondents. (Action No. 2.)

— In actions to be jointly tried to recover damages for libel, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated May 1, 1979, which denied his motion for a change of venue. Order *682reversed, without costs or disbursements, motion granted and the said actions are transferred from Suffolk County to New York County. The motion should have been granted to avoid even the least possible appearance of bias or favoritism. (See *Burstein v Greene,*61 AD2d 827.) Mollen, P. J., Titone, Rabin, Gulotta and Gibbons, JJ., concur.
§ 25.4 Secretarial review and designation. ( a ) *Designation.* The Secretary will review applications for the designation of nominated rural areas to determine the effectiveness of the strategic plans submitted by applicants; such designations of rural empowerment zones and enterprise communities as are made shall be from the applications submitted in response to the notice inviting applications or other applicable notice published in the Federal Register. The Secretary may elect to designate as champion communities those nominated areas which are not designated as either a rural empowerment zone or enterprise community and whose applications meet the criteria contained in § 25.301.
( b ) *Number of rural empowerment zones, enterprise communities and champion communities* — ( 1 ) *Round I.* The Secretary may designate up to three rural Empowerment Zones and up to thirty rural Enterprise Communities prior to December 31, 1996.
( 2 ) *Round II.* The Secretary may, prior to January 1, 1999, designate up to five rural empowerment zones in addition to those designated in Round I.
( 3 ) *Round IIS.* The Secretary may designate up to 20 rural enterprise communities in addition to those designated in Round I.
( 4 ) *Round III.* The Secretary may, prior to January 1, 2002, designate up to two rural empowerment zones in addition to those designated in Round I and Round II.
( 5 ) *Champion communities.* The number of champion communities is limited to the number of applicants which are not designated empowerment zones or enterprise communities.
( c ) *Period of designation.* The designation of a rural area as an Empowerment Zone or Enterprise Community shall remain in effect during the period beginning on the designation date and ending on the earliest of the: ( 1 ) End of the tenth calendar year beginning on or after the designation date;
( 2 ) Termination date designated by the state and local governments in their application for nomination;
( 3 ) Date the Secretary revokes the designation; or
( 4 ) Date the Empowerment Zone or Enterprise Community modifies its boundary without first obtaining the written approval of the Secretary.
[63 FR 19114, Apr. 16, 1998, as amended at 67 FR 13556, Apr. 24, 2002]
Exhibit 32.1

                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                          AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                  PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report of Cascade Technologies Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10QSB for the period  ended November 31, 2006, as filed with
the  Securities  and Exchange Commission on  the  date  hereof  (the  "Periodic
Report"), I, Bruce  Hollingshead,  Chief  Executive  Officer  and  I, Christine
Thomas, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to  18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of
2002, that:

                1.     the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements
                       of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                       of 1934; and

                2.     the  information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
                       presents,   in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
                       condition and results of operations of the Company.


December 15, 2006                      /s/ Bruce Hollingshead
				       --------------------------------------
		                       Bruce Hollingshead, President/Director
				       Chief Executive Officer


December 15, 2006                      /s/ Christine Thomas
				       ------------------------------------
		                       Christine Thomas, Secretary/Director
                                       Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1

                                                           EXHIBIT 21  1996 10-K

                            F&M BANCORPORATION, INC.

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

F&M Bank-Kaukauna*

F&M Merger Corporation

         F&M Bank-East Troy*

         F&M Bank-Fennimore*

         F&M Bank-Kiel*

         F&M Bank-Lakeland*

         F&M Bank-Northeast*

         F&M Bank-Portage County*

         F&M Bank-Potosi*

         F&M Bank-Superior*

         F&M Bank-Winnebago County*

BancUnion Corporation

         F&M Bank-Lancaster*

F&M Bank-Algoma*

F&M Bank-Appleton*

F&M Bank-Brodhead

F&M Bank-Hilbert*

F&M Bank-New London*

F&M Bank-Waushara County*

         Each of the above named subsidiaries is organized and existing under 
the laws of the State of Wisconsin.

---------------------

         *Each of these banks has a subsidiary organized and existing under the
laws of the State of Nevada which holds and manages that bank's investments.
Editorial Note on Part 1980
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1980 appear at 80 FR 9905, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1980.1025 Award process. ( a ) Unless RD indicates otherwise in a notice, the award process for the applicable program identified in § 1980.1002 will be used to determine which Projects receive funding under this subpart.
( b ) Projects not receiving funding under this subpart are eligible to compete for funding under the applicable program identified in § 1980.1002. The scores for such Projects when competing for program funding will not include the score assigned to the application under § 1980.1020(b).
[85 FR 59395, Sept. 22, 2020]
Case 3:20-cv-03678-MCR-ZCB Document 50 Filed 07/21/22 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:20-cv-03678-MCR-ZCB Document 50 Filed 07/21/22 Page 2 of 2
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MAY 24, 2024

NO. 03-23-00874-CV

Kenneth A. Burnett II, Appellant

v.

CIM Management Group, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES SMITH AND THEOFANIS

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION –

OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on November 8, 2023. Having 

reviewed the record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal. Therefore, the 

Court dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to 

pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 22, 2016

Order 

January 22, 2016

152994(64)(65)

EMPLOYERS MUTUAL CASUALTY

COMPANY,

Plaintiff-Counter DefendantAppellee,

v

HELICON ASSOCIATES, INC. and ESTATE OF

MICHAEL J. WITUCKI,

Defendant-Counter Plaintiffs,

and

DR. CHARLES DREW ACADEMY and JEREMY 

GILLIAM,

Defendants,

and

WELLS FARGO ADVANTAGE NATIONAL TAX 

FREE FUND, WELLS FARGO ADVANTAGE 

MUNICIPAL BOND FUND, LORD ABBETT 

MUNICIPAL INCOME FUND, INC. and PIONEER 

MUNICIPAL HIGH INCOME ADVANTAGE,

Defendants-Appellants.

SC: 152994

COA: 322215

Wayne CC: 12-002767-CK

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motions for the temporary admission of out-ofstate attorneys Scott W. Wilkinson and George R. Lyons to appear and practice under 

MCR 8.126(A) on behalf of defendants-appellants are GRANTED.
#### § 27.59 Postponed classification; interference.

Classification pursuant to such suspended request shall not be allowed to interfere with or delay the classification of other samples previously made ready for classification or which are otherwise entitled to priority.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

TYRECE FLEMING,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 5:20-cv-72-TKW/MJF

T. JOHNSON,

Defendant.

/

O R D E R

This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 21). No objections were filed. Upon due consideration of 

the Report and Recommendation and the case file, the Court agrees with the 

magistrate judge’s determination that this case should be dismissed based on

Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED, and the Clerk shall close the case file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 3rd day of May, 2021.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DJI Inspire 1 Remote

Control station consist of:

1 DJI Inspire Remote 

1 Apple iPad Air connected via Apple Lightning cable to USB

The maximum transmission distance of the Inspire 1 remote controller is 2km.

The remote controller also allows you to control the landing gear or activate 

Return to Home with a tap. Other buttons allow instant photo capture, video 

recording, picture review and gimbal control.

Operating Frequency

5.725 ~ 5.825 GHz

2.400 ~ 2.483 GHz

10dBm@900M

13dBm@5.8G

20dBm@2.4G

▪ Output Power:9W

▪ Battery: 6000 mAh LiPo 2S

▪ Max Mobile Device Width:170mm
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Victor Nieves, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his brief, from an amended sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County, imposed November 1, 1977, which revoked probation and resentenced him to an indeterminate term of imprisonment with a maximum of seven years. Amended sentence reversed, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, and matter remitted to Criminal Term for further proceedings consistent herewith. As the District Attorney candidly concedes the matter must be remitted to Criminal Term for resentencing due to the failure of the sentencing court to accord the defendant his rights pursuant to CPL 380.50. Hopkins, J. P., Titone, Mangano and Rabin, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2136 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2136

 To ensure small businesses in rural America have access to credit to 
   promote economic growth and job creation, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2013

Mrs. Hartzler introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                        Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To ensure small businesses in rural America have access to credit to 
   promote economic growth and job creation, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Credit Availability 
Act''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSIONS FROM FINANCIAL ENTITY DEFINITION.

    Section 2(h)(7)(C)(ii) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 
2(h)(7)(C)(ii)) is amended to read as follows:
                            ``(ii) Exclusion.--Such definition shall 
                        not include an entity that is a small bank, 
                        savings association, farm credit system 
                        institution, non-profit cooperative lender 
                        controlled by electric cooperatives, or credit 
                        union if the aggregate uncollateralized outward 
                        exposure plus aggregate potential outward 
                        exposure of the entity with respect to its 
                        swaps does not exceed $1,000,000,000.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendment made by this Act shall take effect as if it had been 
included in subtitle A of title VII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street 
Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

SEC. 4. IMPLEMENTATION.

    The amendment made by this Act shall be implemented--
            (1) without regard to--
                    (A) chapter 35 of title 44, United States Code; and
                    (B) the notice and comment provisions of section 
                553 of title 5, United States Code;
            (2) through the promulgation of an interim final rule, 
        pursuant to which public comment will be sought before a final 
        rule is issued, and
            (3) such that paragraph (1) shall apply solely to changes 
        to rules and regulations, or proposed rules and regulations, 
        that are limited to and directly a consequence of such 
        amendments.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2167 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2167

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 13, 2013

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, 
                           and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To authorize the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to 
  establish additional requirements to improve the fiscal safety and 
  soundness of the home equity conversion mortgage insurance program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reverse Mortgage Stabilization Act 
of 2013''.

SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL SAFETY AND SOUNDNESS REQUIREMENTS FOR HOME EQUITY 
              CONVERSION MORTGAGE INSURANCE PROGRAM.

    Subsection (h) of section 255 of the National Housing Act (12 
U.S.C. 1715z-20(h)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) establish, by notice or mortgagee letter, any 
        additional or alternative requirements that the Secretary, in 
        the Secretary's discretion, determines are necessary to improve 
        the fiscal safety and soundness of the program authorized by 
        this section, which requirements shall take effect upon 
        issuance.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 12, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

 v.

CHRISTOPHER ARMELLIO BARLESE, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-10084

D.C. No. 

3:14-cr-00017-LRH-WGC-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Larry R. Hicks, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted November 17, 2016

San Francisco, California

Before: SCHROEDER, WARDLAW, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Christopher Armellio Barlese appeals his sentence after pleading guilty to

assault with a dangerous weapon in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 113(a)(3), 1151 and

1153. Apparently under the influence of mind-altering drugs, he assaulted an

elderly man in his home, and stabbed him twenty-nine times. 

FILED

DEC 12 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
1. Barlese’s principal argument on appeal is that the district court

improperly considered his rehabilitation needs in imposing the sentence, in

violation of Tapia v. United States, 564 U.S. 319 (2011), and United States v.

Tapia, 665 F.3d 1059 (9th Cir. 2011). We review for plain error. 

The Supreme Court in Tapia recognized that a court is prohibited from

“imposing or lengthening a prison term to promote an offender’s rehabilitation.”

564 U.S. at 332; see also 18 U.S.C. § 3582(a) (providing that imprisonment is “not

an appropriate means of promoting correction and rehabilitation”). There was no

plain error in this case. In sentencing above the Guidelines range, the district court

expressly took into account the appropriate factors under § 3553(a)(2). Although it

recognized that the defendant has serious mental health issues, the court did not

suggest that the sentence itself was imposed out of concern for rehabilitation needs. 

2. The district court did not abuse its discretion by imposing a

substantively unreasonable sentence. See United States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984,

993 (9th Cir. 2008). The district court expressly noted that it “started at the

[G]uidelines” in calculating Barlese’s sentence and gave “great deference” to the

parties’ sentencing recommendation, but that the circumstances of the offense and

Barlese’s criminal history warranted its rejection of the plea agreement and upward

departure from the Guidelines range. Similarly, the district court explained that it

2
was “fully aware of the defendant’s mental health issues, his drug history, his

family history” and incorporated into its analysis the likelihood that those factors

contributed to Barlese’s criminal record. Finally, the record does not indicate that

the district court was influenced in its sentencing determination by the

government’s victim impact evidence, because all such evidence was available

elsewhere in the record.

AFFIRMED.

3