alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc. (the “Company”)for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, James F. Cleary, Jr.and Mary Patricia B. Thompson, Chief Executive Officer and Chief FinancialOfficer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto our knowledge:

 
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                    |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of  operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in  the Report. |

 

May 6, 2010

 

 
| /s/ James F.  Cleary, Jr. |     |
|--------------------------------|----------|
| James F. Cleary, Jr.      |     |
| *Chief  Executive Officer*     | * * |
|                           |     |
|                           |     |
| /s/ Mary  Patricia B. Thompson |     |
| Mary Patricia B.  Thompson     |     |
| *Chief  Financial Officer*     | * * |

* *

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of CEO Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation for the quarter ended September 30,2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,Roger W. Stone, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of KapStone Paper andPackaging Corporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to my knowledge:

 
| (1)    |   | The Report  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                    |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                 |
| (2)    |   | The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of KapStone Paper  and Packaging Corporation. |

 

Dated: November 10, 2008

 
|   | By:                                   |      /s/  Roger W. Stone |
|--------|---------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                  |      Roger  W. Stone     |
|   | Chairman and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
**Exhibit32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection withthe Annual Report of M.L. Macadamia Orchards, L.P. (the “Company”) on              Form 10-K/A for the period endedDecember 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), we, the undersigned management of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| /s/                                    | Dennis J.  Simonis |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------------------|--------|
|                                   |
| Dennis J.  Simonis                     |
| President and  Chief Executive Officer |
| April 12, 2007                         |

 

----
#### § 29.1036 Mixed Group (M).

This group consists of tobacco from three or more groups or two distinctly different groups which are mixed together in various combinations.

[49 FR 16755, Apr. 20, 1984. Redesignated at 51 FR 25027, July 10, 1986]
#### Office of Disciplinary Counsel *v.*Romaniw.

[Cite as *Disciplinary Counsel v. Romaniw*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 462.]

(No. 98-384

Submitted June 24, 1998

Decided October 28, 1998.)

*464
      *Jonathan E. Coughlan,*Disciplinary Counsel, and *Lori J. Brown,*Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.

*Michael Tuan Bustamante*and *Sonali Bustamante Wilson,*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

As we said in *Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Belock*(1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 98, 100, 694 N.E.2d 897, 899, “The continuing public confidence in the judicial system and the bar requires that the strictest discipline be imposed in misappropriation cases.” We find no mitigating circumstances here that would justify an exception to that principle. Respondent is hereby permanently disbarred from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs are taxed to respondent.

*Judgment accordingly.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
#### § 29.2568 Unsound (U).

Damaged under 20 percent. (See Rule 20, § 29.2636.)

[37 FR 13626, July 12, 1972. Redesignated at 49 FR 16757, Apr. 20, 1984 and 51 FR 40406, Nov. 7, 1986]
#### In the Matter of Otto Scheuble, Appellant, v Neal Doyle, as Assessor of the Town of Mamaroneck, Respondent. In the Matter of Kathryn Scheuble et al., Appellants, v Thomas J. McEvoy, as Assessor of the Town of Mamaroneck, Respondent.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated May 10, 1978, affirmed, with costs (see *Matter of Hartland Arms v Tax Comm, of City of N. Y.,*54 AD2d 700, 701). Mollen P. J., Titone, O’Connor and Mangano, JJ., concur.
#### The State ex rel. Young, Appellant, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio, Appellee.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Young v. Indus. Comm.*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 560.]

(No. 97-1583

Submitted August 19, 1998

Decided November 10, 1998.)

*Law Office of Thomas Tootle*and *Thomas Tootle,*for appellant.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Craigg E. Gould,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed, and the cause is returned to the Industrial Commission for relief pursuant to *State ex rel. Noll v. Indus. Comm.*(1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 203, 567 N.E.2d 245.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

*561Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting. I dissent and would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. Moyer, C.J., and Cook, J., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.
#### PEOPLE, Respondent, v. DONNELLY, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

June 1, 1906.)

Proceedings by the people of the state of New York against Johri J. Donnelly.

No opinion. Motion granted; stenographer’s minutes to be furnished and appellant’s papers on appeal to be printed at the expense of the county of Onondaga, upon audit and allowance by this court.
#### § 2018.255 Appeals.

If all or any part of an initial request is denied, it may be appealed in accordance with 7 CFR 1.7 to that particular Agency possessing the documents. Please select the appropriate Agency to forward your FOIA appeal from the following addresses: Administrator, Rural Housing Service, Room 5014, AG Box 0701, 14th & Independence Avenue, SW.—South Building, Washington, DC 20250-0701; Administrator, Rural Business-Cooperative Service, Room 5045, AG Box 3201, 14th & Independence Avenue, SW.—South Building, Washington, DC 20250-3201 and Administrator, Rural Utilities Service, Room 4501, AG Box 1510, 14th & Independence Avenue, SW.—South Building, Washington, DC 20250-1510. The phrase “FOIA APPEAL” should appear on the front of the envelope in capital letters.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ithaka Acquisition Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 (the
"Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I Paul A. Brooke, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


By:  /s/ PAUL A. BROOKE                                 Dated: November 14, 2005
  -------------------------------
         Paul A. Brooke
         Chairman of the Board and
         Chief Executive Officer
         (Principal Executive Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 224 (Monday, November 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 71122]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29315]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 7518-012--New York]


Erie Boulevard Hydropower L.P.; Notice of Scoping Meetings and 
Environmental Site Review

November 15, 2010.
    Commission staff will be conducting two public scoping meetings and 
an environmental site review in support of the relicensing proceeding 
for the Hogansburg Hydroelectric Project (No. 7518), at the times and 
places noted below. The daytime meeting will focus on resource agency, 
Indian tribes, and non-governmental organization concerns, while the 
evening meeting is primarily for receiving input from the public. We 
invite all interested individuals, organizations, and agencies to 
attend one or both of the meetings, and to assist staff in identifying 
particular study needs, as well as the scope of environmental issues to 
be addressed in the environmental document that Commission staff will 
prepare in this proceeding.
    The times of these meetings are as follows:

Daytime Scoping Meeting

    Date: Tuesday, December 14, 2010.
    Time: 1 p.m.

Evening Scoping Meeting

    Date: Tuesday, December 14, 2010.
    Time: 7 p.m.
    The location for both meetings is: Wolfclan 37 Hotel, 1450 State 
Route 37, Hogansburg, NY 13655, Phone: (770) 992-2055.
    Commission staff will conduct an environmental site review (site 
visit) of the project on Tuesday, December 14, 2010, starting at 3 
p.m., following the daytime scoping meeting. All participants should 
meet at the Wolfclan 37 Hotel, 1450 State Route 37, Hogansburg, NY. All 
participants are responsible for their own transportation. Anyone with 
questions about the site visit should contact Mr. Steven Murphy of 
Brookfield Power at (315) 598-6130 on or before December 10, 2010.
    Further details about the scoping process and the relicensing of 
the Hogansburg Project will be provided in a subsequent notice. For 
additional information, please contact John Mudre of the Commission 
staff at (202) 502-8902.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-29315 Filed 11-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### §§ 25.105-25.199 [Reserved]
#### § 15c.1 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to establish the nondiscrimination policy of the USDA on the basis of age in programs and activities funded in whole or in part by USDA, in compliance with the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended (Age Act), and the requirements set by the HHS in its Government-wide regulation at 45 CFR part 90.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 212 

To permit members of the House of Representatives to donate used computer 

equipment to public elementary and secondary schools designated by 

the members. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2013 

Mr. SERRANO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To permit members of the House of Representatives to donate used computer equipment to public elementary and 

secondary schools designated by the members. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMITTING MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF 

4 REPRESENTATIVES TO DONATE USED COM5 PUTER EQUIPMENT TO PUBLIC SCHOOLS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 104(a)(3) of the Legisla7 tive Branch Appropriations Act, 1987 (as incorporated by 

8 reference in section 101(j) of Public Law 99–500 and 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•HR 212 IH

1 Public Law 99–591) (2 U.S.C. 117e(3)) is amended to 

2 read as follows: 

3 ‘‘(3)(A) At the request of a member of the 

4 House of Representatives, in the case of equipment 

5 consisting of computers and related peripheral tools 

6 previously used by the member, the Clerk may do7 nate the equipment to a public elementary or sec8 ondary school (as defined in section 9101 of the Ele9 mentary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 

10 U.S.C. 7801)) without regard to whether the dona11 tion meets the requirements of the second sentence 

12 of paragraph (2). 

13 ‘‘(B) At the request of the member who pre14 viously used the equipment, if the Clerk donates 

15 equipment under this paragraph, the Clerk shall do16 nate the equipment to a school designated by the 

17 member.’’. 

18 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

19 subsection (a) shall take effect June 1, 2013. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 1:88-cr-01007-MP-AK

WILLIE BUD REED, JR.,

Defendant.

________________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 1123, Amended Motion for Rehearing and/or

Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment, filed by Willie Bud Reed, Jr. In a prior order, Doc. 1119,

Mr. Reed’s Motion to Correct Clerical Errors in Defendant’s Presentence Investigation Report

was denied. The Defendant now asks the Court to reconsider this order, in which the Court

found no error in Defendant’s Presentence Report. Because Defendant is not challenging his

sentence, but rather the computation of his criminal history points, there is no issue of an

unauthorized second or successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

Because Mr. Reed’s supervised release ended on June 17, 1987, and the trial evidence

did not mention the Defendant’s participation in the instant offense until October 1987, Mr. Reed

argues that it was error to assign two point under §4A1.1(d) for commission of the instant

offense while on supervised release. After reviewing the Presentence Report, the Court believes

that Mr. Reed has created an arguable question as to whether he should have been attributed the

two points assessed under paragraph 32 of the Criminal History Computation in the Presentence

Report. Therefore, in an abundance of caution, the Court will reconsider its prior order denying

Mr. Reed’s motion to correct clerical errors. To assist the Court in its reconsideration, the

Case 1:88-cr-01007-MW-GRJ Document 1126 Filed 11/08/06 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 1:88-cr-01007-MP-AK

Government is directed to file a response to the Defendant’s Motion to Correct Clerical Errors.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

The Government is hereby directed to file a response to Defendant Reed’s motion in Doc.

1118, and to explain why the assessment of two points, pursuant to §4A1.1(d) of the

Sentencing Guidelines, in the Criminal History Computation of the Presentence Report is

not in error. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 8th day of November, 2006

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:88-cr-01007-MW-GRJ Document 1126 Filed 11/08/06 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.1****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Directed Electronics, Inc. (the“Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James E. Minarik, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                         /s/ James E. Minarik   James E. Minarik  Date: November 8, 2007 Chief Executive Officer
§ 2810.3 Functions. ( a ) *Director.* Provides executive direction for OO. Develops and promulgates overall policies and provides general direction, leadership, oversight, and coordination of USDA management of procurement, real and personal property activities, mail and copier management. Provides executive services to the Office of the Secretary and operates activities providing consolidated USDA administrative functions and services.
( b ) *Deputy Director.* Assists the Director, and in the absence of the Director, serves as Acting Director.
( c ) *Administrative Unit.* Provides support for agency management regarding budget, accounting, personnel, and other administrative matters.
( d ) *Executive Services Division.* Provides executive services to the Office of the Secretary in travel arrangements, supplies, furnishings, communications, equipment, and records. Operates the central USDA DC imprest fund.
( e ) *Facilities Management Division.* Operates and maintains the USDA DC headquarters building complex, including headquarters parking. Oversees management and operation of USDA buildings nationwide, and provides DC area labor services.
( f ) *Mail and Reproduction Management Division.* Oversees USDA mail, copier, and duplicating programs. Operates DC area central activities in these areas.
( g ) *Personal Property Management Division.* Oversees USDA supply, motor vehicle, and personal property programs. Operates centralized warehouse and property rehabilitation facilities.
( h ) *Procurement Division.* Oversees USDA procurement programs. Operates centralized purchasing operations for ADP and Washington area activities.
( i ) *Real Property Management Division.* Oversees USDA real property management programs.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ronald Horton, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered on May 16, 1978, unanimously affirmed. Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. (See *Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious points which could be raised on this appeal. (See *People v Green,*74 AD2d 1005.) Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Birns, Markewich and Yesawich, JJ.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**CLAY D. WILLIAMS,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 582 EAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 8th day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allow ance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**

**Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.**
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**In connection with the Quarterly Report of AMERICAN BARGE LINE COMPANY (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, Christopher A. Black, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.     /s/ CHRISTOPHER A. BLACKMay 15, 2006 Christopher A. Black  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
43
EXHIBIT 3.1(e)

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                        THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                              DERMARx CORPORATION.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the
                General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


         I, Maryanne Carroll, President of DERMARx CORPORATION., a corporation
organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, do hereby
certify as follows:

         FIRST, that the Certificate of Incorporation of said corporation be
amended as follows:

1. By striking out the whole of ARTICLE FOURTH, subparagraph (a) as it now
exists and inserting in lieu and instead thereof a new ARTICLE FOURTH,
subparagraph (a) reading as follows:

                               "The maximum number of shares that the
              corporation shall have authority to issue is Eight Million Eight
              Hundred (8,000,800) of which eight millions (8,000,000) shares
              shall be common stock having a par value of $0.05 per share
              ("common stock") and eight hundred (800) shall be series preferred
              stock having a par value of $.10 per share (series preferred
              stock)."

         SECOND, that such amendment has been duly adopted in accordance with
the provisions of the General Corporation law of the State of Delaware by the
written consent of the holders of not less than a majority of the outstanding
stock entitled to vote thereon and that written notice of the corporate action
has been given to those stockholders who have not consented in writing, all in
accordance with the provision of Section 228 of the General Corporation Law of
the State of Delaware.



                                                               STATE OF DELAWARE
                                                              SECRETARY OF STATE
                                                        DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS
                                                       FILED 09:00 AM 11/07/1995
                                                             950257965 - 2063399



<PAGE>


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed this certificate this 6th day of
November, 1995.



                                             /s/ Maryanne Carroll
                                             ----------------------------
                                             Maryanne Carroll, President






                                        2