alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Report of ZIM Corporation, a Canadian corporation
(the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB/A-3 for the year ended March 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Jennifer North, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:


     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Jennifer North
-------------------

 Jennifer North
Chief Financial Officer
April 21, 2006
#### § 27.35 Lower class of two samples to prevail.

In case a sample drawn from one portion of a bale is lower in class than one drawn from another portion of such bale, except as otherwise provided in this subpart, the classification of the bale shall be that of the sample showing the lower class.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LEROY JOHN DISSINGER,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; et al.,

 Respondents - Appellees.

No. 12-55128

D.C. No. 2:11-cv-04631-JHN-SS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Jacqueline H. Nguyen, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 15, 2013** 

Before: FISHER, GOULD, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Leroy John Dissinger appeals pro se from the district court’s order

dismissing without prejudice his petition to quash an Internal Revenue Service

summons issued to a third party in connection with an investigation of his federal

tax liabilities. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 26 U.S.C.

FILED

OCT 23 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-55128

§ 7609(h)(1). We review for an abuse of discretion the district court’s decision

regarding the sufficiency of service of process, Rio Props., Inc. v. Rio Int’l

Interlink, 284 F.3d 1007, 1014 (9th Cir. 2002), and its dismissal for failure to

complete service in a timely manner, Oyama v. Sheehan (In re Sheehan), 253 F.3d

507, 511 (9th Cir. 2001). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing without

prejudice Dissinger’s petition because, as Dissinger now concedes, he did not

effectuate service as required under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4, and he

failed to provide sufficient reason for not doing so. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(i), (m)

(setting forth the requirements for service on the United States and the 120-day

deadline for completing service); Mollison v. United States, 568 F.3d 1073, 1077

(9th Cir. 2009) (Rule 4(m) applies to service of a petition under 26 U.S.C.

§ 7609(b)); In re Sheehan, 253 F.3d at 512 (explaining the requirements for

showing good cause under Rule 4(m)).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Dissinger’s motion

for relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(1) because Dissinger failed

to show excusable neglect. See Lemoge v. United States, 587 F.3d 1188, 1191-92

(9th Cir. 2009) (setting forth the standard of review and factors for determining

when neglect is excusable).
3 12-55128

Dissinger’s contention that the district court erred in rejecting his reply brief

as untimely is unsupported by the record.

AFFIRMED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0255 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CARL SANGREY,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including April 1, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 24 2022

02/24/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0255
Nicor Inc. Form 8-K
 Exhibit 10.04








AMENDMENT
TO


RESTRICTED
STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT


NICOR
INC. 2006 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN








THIS
AMENDMENT is entered into effective as of the ___ day of ______, 2010 by and
between _____________ (the “Employee”), and Nicor Inc., an Illinois corporation
(the “Company”).





WITNESSETH
THAT:





WHEREAS,
the Company and the Employee entered into a Restricted Stock Unit Agreement
dated as of _____________, as the same may previously have been amended from
time to time, (the “Restricted Stock Unit Agreement”) evidencing an award of
Restricted Stock Units by the Company to the Employee pursuant to Section 4.4 of
the Nicor Inc. 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”); and





WHEREAS,
the Company and the Employee are entering into this Amendment in order to amend
the provision of the Restricted Stock Unit Agreement concerning withholding
obligations.








NOW,
THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED, by and between the Company and the Employee as
follows:





I.           Paragraph
8 of the Restricted Stock Unit Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and
the following new Paragraph 8 is substituted in lieu thereof:





“8.        Withholding. 
The Company may require that the Employee pay to the Company, or the Company may
otherwise withhold, at the time of delivery of the shares of Stock pursuant to
the Restricted Stock Units, any such amount as is required by law or regulation
to be withheld for federal, state or local income tax or any other taxes
incurred by reason of such payment. At the election of the Employee, unless
otherwise prohibited by the Committee, such withholding obligations may be
satisfied pursuant to any of the methods authorized by Section 6.7 of the
Plan. ”





II.          Except
where the context clearly implies or indicates the contrary, a word, term, or
phrase used in the Plan is similarly used in this Amendment.





III.         Except
as otherwise expressly amended by this Amendment, the Restricted Stock Unit
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its
terms.








IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Employee has hereunto set his hand, and the Company has
caused these presents to be executed in its name and on its behalf, all
effective as of the date first above written.






EMPLOYEE
      NAMENICOR
      INC.By:Its:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA preliminary evaluation of an F100 engine parameter estimation process using flight dataThe parameter estimation algorithm developed for the F100 engine is described. The algorithm is a two-step process. The first step consists of a Kalman filter estimation of five deterioration parameters, which model the off-nominal behavior of the engine during flight. The second step is based on a simplified steady-state model of the compact engine model (CEM). In this step, the control vector in the CEM is augmented by the deterioration parameters estimated in the first step. The results of an evaluation made using flight data from the F-15 aircraft are presented, indicating that the algorithm can provide reasonable estimates of engine variables for an advanced propulsion control law development.Document ID19910012133Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsMaine, Trindel A.*(NASA Hugh L. Dryden Flight Research Facility Edwards, CA, United States)*Gilyard, Glenn B.*(NASA Hugh L. Dryden Flight Research Facility Edwards, CA, United States)*Lambert, Heather H.*(NASA Hugh L. Dryden Flight Research Facility Edwards, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 1990Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And Heat TransferReport/Patent NumberH-1602NASA-TM-4216NAS 1.15:4216Meeting InformationMeeting: AIAA Joint Propulsion ConferenceLocation: Orlando, FLCountry: United StatesStart Date: July 16, 1990End Date: July 18, 1990Accession Number91N21446Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-63-31Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19910012133.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 201.30a Date of test.

When the percentage of germination is required to be shown, the label shall show the month and year in which the germination test was completed. No more than 5 calendar months shall have elapsed between the last day of the month in which the germination test was completed and the date of transportation or delivery for transportation in interstate commerce, except for seed in hermetically sealed containers in which case no more than 24 calendar months shall have elapsed between the last day of the month in which the germination test was completed prior to packaging and the date of transportation or delivery for transportation in interstate commerce.

[32 FR 12779, Sept. 6, 1967]
###### Editorial Note on Part 1944

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1944 appear at 80 FR 9885, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1944.542 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          31,981
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,307
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      12,570,757
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,442,634
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,758,588
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          996,758
<BONDS>                                      8,970,613
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,316,518)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,758,588
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,251,911
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  627,719
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,162,024
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,297,537)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,297,537)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,297,537)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (91.88)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 22.304 Multiyear planning and programming.

State and multicounty jurisdictions are encouraged to adopt multiyear planning and development programs. As administrative procedures for implementing the Act support the feasibility of such a process, these programs should consider joint State, Federal, and local budget planning factors and be refined to conform to the actual fund availability as annual budgets are finalized and allocated. Such programs, once initiated, will be extended by the annual addition of a new planning year until programs are completed or terminated.
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS

*May 9, 2006*

[Cite as *05/09/2006 Case Announcements,*2006-Ohio-2256.]

*1452MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

2005-2320.

#### Cincinnati School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Revision.

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2004-A-767. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal is granted. Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.
#### General Instrument Corporation, Appellant, v Fairchild Camera and Instrument Corporation et al., Respondents.

Orders, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on November 30, 1979 and January 22, 1980, respectively, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Klein, J., at Special Term. Respondents shall recover of appellant one bill of $50 costs and disbursements of this appeal. No opinion. Concur—Fein, J. P., Sullivan, Lupiano, Bloom and Carro, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc. (the “Registrant”) onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)               The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)               The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Registrant.

 
|   | By:                                   | /s/ Arthur F. Helf |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------------------|
|   | Arthur F. Helf                        |
|   | Chairman and Chief  Executive Officer |
|   |                                  |
|   | Dated: May 11,  2009             |

 

----
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 2, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00010

- CV

Pedro MARQUEZ , Jr

., Appellant

v.

Lisa A. WATKINS

, Appellee

From the County Court at Law, Starr County, Texas

Trial Court No. CC

- 14

- 89

Honorable Romero Molina, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant ’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief has this date been received

and filed in the above styled and numbered cause. Extension of time to file the Appellant’s brief

is this date GRANTED. Time is extended to August 14, 2015.



### PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

____________________________

KEITH E. HOT TLE

CLERK OF COURT

cc: Hilda Gonzalez

Law Office of Hilda Gonzalez Garza, P.L.L.C.

205 E. 5th St.

Rio Grande City, TX 78582 Carmen Benavides Ramirez

4715 S. Jackson Rd

Edinburg, TX 78539

- 8300
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 181 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 181

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 3031 Veterans Road West in Staten Island, New York, as the ``Leonard 
                    Montalto Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2013

  Mr. Grimm introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 3031 Veterans Road West in Staten Island, New York, as the ``Leonard 
                    Montalto Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LEONARD MONTALTO POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 3031 Veterans Road West in Staten Island, New York, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Leonard Montalto Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Leonard 
Montalto Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 28.68 Withdrawal of application for review.

Any application for review may be withdrawn by the applicant at any time before the review classification of the cotton covered thereby has been completed, subject to the payment of such fees, if any, as may be prescribed in this subpart.
#### GIEBHARDT, Respondent, v. GIEBHARDT, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 27, 1906.)

Action by John W. Giebhardt against Lizzie Giebhardt.

No opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal granted, unless the appellant pay $10 costs and perfect her appeal within 10 days, in which case the motion is denied.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

LONNIE L WILSEY, SR,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:03-cv-00064-MP-AK

JOHNSTON,

LEVY COUNTY JAIL,

OFFICER MILLER,

SECKEL,

SHEFFIELD,

JOHNNY SMITH,

WATSON,

Defendants.

___________________________/

O R D E R 

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 22, Report and Recommendation of Magistrate

Judge Kornblum, recommending that this cause be dismissed without prejudice. The Magistrate

Judge filed the Report and Recommendation on Friday, June 17, 2005. The parties have been

furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to

file objections. Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), this Court must make

a de novo review of those portions to which an objection has been made. Neither party has filed

an objection. Having considered the Report and Recommendation and lack of objections thereto

timely filed, I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be ADOPTED.

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated

by reference in this order.

Case 1:03-cv-00064-MP-AK Document 23 Filed 07/29/05 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 1:03-cv-00064-MP-AK

2. This cause is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

DONE AND ORDERED this 29th day of July, 2005.

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge 

Case 1:03-cv-00064-MP-AK Document 23 Filed 07/29/05 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.22

                                   ALTEON INC.
           DESCRIPTION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS

      The following are Alteon's executive officers. The salaries for 2005 have
been set as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER          POSITION               2005 SALARY  2005 BONUS RANGE
-----------------------  -----------------------------  -----------  ----------------
<S>                      <C>                            <C>          <C>
Kenneth I. Moch          President and Chief Executive   $382,454      $0 to $150,000
                         Officer

Judith S. Hedstrom       Chief Operating Officer         $300,000      $0 to $75,000

Elizabeth A. O'Dell      Vice President, Finance         $191,227      $0 to $20,000
                         Secretary and Treasurer
</TABLE>

      In addition to the above, each of the executive officers, at the
discretion of Alteon's Compensation Committee, may receive an additional
year-end bonus.
#### The State ex rel. Grumman Ohio Corporation, Appellant, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Grumman Ohio Corp. v. ■ Indus. Comm.*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 358.]

(No. 96-1471

Submitted August 19, 1998

Decided October 14, 1998.)

*Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, Darrell R. Shepard*and *Christopher C. Russell,*for appellant.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Craigg E. Gould,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission.

*Word, Kaps, Bainbridge, Maurer & Melvin*and *William J. Melvin,*for appellee Minia Baughman.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.
|        |
|--------|
|        |
|   |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |

|                                          |
|------------------------------------------|
|                                          |  |  |
| Delaware                                 |   | 47-0210602 |
| (State of Incorporation)                 |   | (I.R.S. Employer |
|                                     |   | Identification No.) |
|                                     |   |   |
| 1025 Eldorado Blvd., Broomfield, CO      |   | 80021-8869 |
| (Address of principal executive offices) |   | (Zip Code) |

|                                         |
|-----------------------------------------|
|                                         |  |  |
| Common Stock, par value $.01 per share; |   | New York Stock Exchange |
| Preferred Stock Purchase Rights         |   |   |

----

|                                               |
|-----------------------------------------------|
|                                               |  |  |
| Large accelerated filer x                     |   | Accelerated filer o |
|                                          |   |   |
| Non-accelerated filer o                       |   | Smaller reporting company o |
| (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |   |   |

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        |  |  |
| Title                                  |   | Outstanding |
| Common Stock, par value $.01 per share |   |  208,258,103 as of February 23, 2012 |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |
|   |

----

----

|                      |
|----------------------|
|                      |  |
|                 |   |
| Dated March 22, 2012 | By: /s/ ERIC J. MORTENSEN |
|                 | Eric J. Mortensen |
|                 | Senior Vice President and Controller |
|                 | (Principal Accounting Officer) |