alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 28.183 Methods of cotton classification and comparison. ( a ) The classification of foreign-growth cotton samples shall be determined by the quality of a sample in accordance with the Universal Cotton Standards (the official cotton standards of the United States) for the color grade and the leaf grade of Upland Cotton, the length of staple, and fiber property measurements such as length uniformity, strength, and micronaire. High Volume Instruments will determine all fiber property measurements except the determination of the presence of extraneous matter, special conditions and remarks. High Volume Instrument colorimeter measurements will be used for determining the official color grade. Cotton classers certified by the Cotton and Tobacco Program will determine the presence of extraneous matter, special conditions and remarks and authorized employees of the Cotton and Tobacco Program will determine all fiber property measurements using High Volume Instruments. The classification record issued by the Quality Assurance Division with respect to any cotton sample shall be deemed to be the classification record of the Department.
( b ) Additional procedures and methods pertaining to the classification of foreign-growth cotton samples are outlined in §§ 28.36 through 28.40.
( c ) When a comparison of such cotton samples with other actual samples or with a type is requested, the procedure and methods shall be as outlined in §§ 28.45 through 28.47.
[81 FR 7031, Feb. 10, 2016]
MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

2005-2134.

#### Preferred Capital, Inc. v. Power Eng. Group, Inc.

Summit App. No. 22475, 163 Ohio App.3d 522, 2005-Ohio-5113. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Summit County. Upon consideration of the application for dismissal of appellant Richard Oscar and Associates,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal is granted.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the appeals of the other appellants remain pending.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVID JOYNER,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

BANK OF AMERICA HOME LOANS

SERVICING, LP and MORTGAGE

ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION

SYSTEMS, INC.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 10-16885

D.C. No. 2:09-cv-02406-GMNRJJ

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 15, 2012** 

Before: CANBY, GRABER, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

David Joyner appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his action arising out of foreclosure proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28

FILED

MAY 25 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-16885

U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. King v. California, 784 F.2d 910, 912 (9th

Cir. 1986). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Joyner’s claims for the reasons stated

in its order entered on July 26, 2010. 

Contrary to Joyner’s contention, the district court properly applied federal

pleading standards following the removal of the action from state court based on

diversity jurisdiction. See Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USA, 317 F.3d 1097, 1102

(9th Cir. 2003) (“The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure apply irrespective of the

source of subject matter jurisdiction, and irrespective of whether the substantive

law at issue is state or federal.”).

Joyner’s remaining contentions, including those concerning the funding and

securitization of the loan and standing to bring non-judicial foreclosure, are

unpersuasive.

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 The undersigned, John M. Fluke, Jr., the Interim Principal Executive Officer of CellCyte Genetics Corporation, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CellCyte Genetics Corporation, for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of CellCyte Genetics Corporation. Date: December 22, 2008. /s/ John M. Fluke, Jr.___John M. Fluke, Jr.Interim Principal Executive Officer __________     Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 The undersigned, Randy A. Lieber, the Principal Accounting Officer of CellCyte Genetics Corporation, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of CellCyte Genetics Corporation, for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of CellCyte Genetics Corporation. Date: December 22, 2008. /s/ Randy A. Lieber___Randy A. LieberPrincipal Accounting Officer __________
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Rothaar, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered October 25, 1977, convicting him of attempted murder, robbery in the third degree, and burglary in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial ordered. At trial, the complaining witness identified the defendant as the man who, on June 21, 1973, had burglarized her home, and robbed and assaulted her. However, defendant’s physical appearance at trial differed significantly from the description she had given of the perpetrator shortly after the incident. Moreover, at trial, the defendant presented a plausible alibi defense. In view of the substantial factual issues which were thus presented, we believe that the errors committed by the trial court require that the judgment of conviction be reversed, and a new trial ordered. The trial court erred in permitting the complaining witness to testify, over the defendant’s objection, that she had been shown approximately 30 photographs by a police officer and that she had not selected any from the group. Such testimony was hearsay, and improperly bolstered her in-court identification of the defendant by implying that she had not picked out a photograph of someone other than the defendant from the photographs. Furthermore, the testimony suggested to the jurors that she subsequently identified a photograph of the defendant, a fact which could not, of course, have been directly elicited from her (see *People v Sullivan,*5 AD2d 847; *People v Angora,*13 AD2d 72; Wall, Eye-Witness Identification in Criminal Cases, pp 167-168). Additionally, the court’s charge on the issue of identity was incomplete, since it failed to advise the jury that, in weighing the evidence on that issue, it could consider the accuracy of the complainant’s prior descriptions of her assailant *(People v Gardner,*59 AD2d 913; *People v Jackson,*39 AD2d 557). Finally, the court’s charge as to the alibi defense was improper in two respects. The Trial Judge’s instruction that "you must be satisfied as to the truth of the alibi” could be interpreted by the jury as shifting the burden of proof (see *People v Griswold,*72 AD2d 778). The court’s statement that alibi evidence "should be examined most closely” was also misleading, since no similar admonition was contained in the court’s charge on the issue of identity *(People v Fludd,*68 AD2d 409). Titone, J. P., Mangano, Martuscello and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
Order entered May 22, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00361-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF N.E., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 256th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-12-13599-Z

ORDER

Because this is an accelerated appeal from a decree terminating appellant’s parental 

rights, we GRANT appellant’s May 19, 2015 motion for additional time to file brief to the extent 

we ORDER the brief be filed no later than June 11, 2015. We caution appellant that no further 

extensions will be granted absent exigent circumstances. 

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
Case 3:96-cr-00042-RV Document 234 Filed 08/03/05 Page 1 of 1
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Securus Technologies, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this quarterly report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this quarterly report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant and
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this
quarterly report is being prepared;b.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this quarterly
report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures as of the period covered by this
quarterly report, based on such evaluation;
andc.
    
    disclosed in this quarterly report any change
in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee
of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting.
 /s/ KEITH KELSONKeith KelsonNovember 16, 2005
    Chief Financial Officer
#### § 29.2601 Elements of quality and degrees of each element.

Tobacco attributes or characteristics which constitute quality are designated as elements of quality. The range within each element is expressed by words or terms designated as degrees. These degrees are arranged to show their relative value and are used in determining the quality of tobacco. The actual value of each degree varies with group.

| Elements | | Degrees | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Body | Thin | Medium | Heavy. |
| Maturity | Immature | Mature | Ripe. |
| Leaf structure | Close | Firm | Open. |
| Oil | Lean | Oily | Rich. |
| Elasticity | Inelastic | Semielastic | Elastic. |
| Strength | Weak | Normal | Strong. |
| Finish | Dull | Clear | Bright. |
| Color intensity | Pale | Moderate | Deep. |
| Width | Narrow | Normal | Spready. |
| Uniformity......Expressed in percentages. | | | |
| Injury tolerance...Expressed in percentages. | | | |
#### § 29.2501 Definitions.

As used in these standards, the words and phrases hereinafter defined shall have the indicated meanings so assigned.
Case 3:20-cv-04698-TKW-HTC Document 1-4 Filed 03/11/20 Page 1 of 1
OAO 247 (02/08) Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

United States of America )

)

)

)

)

)

v.

NICO CURRINGTON Case No: 3:96CR61-02/RV

USM No: 04009-007

Date of Previous Judgment: February 20, 1997 Randolph P. Murrell, Federal Public Defender

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Applicable) Defendant’s Attorney

Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

Upon motion of x the defendant 9 the Director of the Bureau of Prisons 9 the court under 18 U.S.C.

§ 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has

subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 994(u), and having considered such motion,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is:

X GRANTED and the defendant’s previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in 

the last judgment issued) of 360 months is reduced to 324 months .

I. COURT DETERMINATION OF GUIDELINE RANGE (Prior to Any Departures)

Previous Offense Level: 40 Amended Offense Level: 38

Criminal History Category: IV Criminal History Category: IV

Previous Guideline Range: 360 to LIFE months Amended Guideline Range: 324 to 405 months

II. SENTENCE RELATIVE TO AMENDED GUIDELINE RANGE

X The reduced sentence is within the amended guideline range.

9 The previous term of imprisonment imposed was less than the guideline range applicable to the defendant at the time

of sentencing as a result of a departure or Rule 35 reduction, and the reduced sentence is comparably less than the

amended guideline range.

9 Other (explain):

III. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

Except as provided above, all provisions of the judgment dated February 20, 1997 shall remain in effect.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Order Date: September 12, 2008 /s/ Roger Vinson

Judge’s signature

Effective Date: Roger Vinson, Senior U.S. District Judge 

(if different from order date) Printed name and title

Case 3:96-cr-00061-RV-MD Document 332 Filed 09/12/08 Page 1 of 1
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2115 

To amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to require an individual who applies for a motor vehicle driver’s license in a new State 

to indicate whether the new State is to serve as the individual’s residence 

for purposes of registering to vote in elections for Federal office, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 22, 2013 

Mrs. MILLER of Michigan (for herself and Mr. ROKITA) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 to 

require an individual who applies for a motor vehicle 

driver’s license in a new State to indicate whether the 

new State is to serve as the individual’s residence for 

purposes of registering to vote in elections for Federal 

office, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Voter Registration Ef5 ficiency Act’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2115 IH

1 SEC. 2. REQUIRING APPLICANTS FOR MOTOR VEHICLE 

2 DRIVER’S LICENSES IN NEW STATE TO INDI3 CATE WHETHER STATE SERVES AS RESI4 DENCE FOR VOTER REGISTRATION PUR5 POSES. 

6 (a) REQUIREMENTS FOR APPLICANTS FOR LI7 CENSES.—Section 5(d) of the National Voter Registration 

8 Act of 1993 (42 U.S.C. 1973gg–3(d)) is amended— 

9 (1) by striking ‘‘Any change’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘(1) Any change’’; and 

11 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

12 paragraph: 

13 ‘‘(2)(A) A State motor vehicle authority shall require 

14 each individual applying for a motor vehicle driver’s li15 cense in the State— 

16 ‘‘(i) to indicate whether the individual resides in 

17 another State or resided in another State prior to 

18 applying for the license, and, if so, to identify the 

19 State involved; and 

20 ‘‘(ii) to indicate whether the individual intends 

21 for the State to serve as the individual’s residence 

22 for purposes of registering to vote in elections for 

23 Federal office. 

24 ‘‘(B) If pursuant to subparagraph (A)(ii) an indi25 vidual indicates to the State motor vehicle authority that 

26 the individual intends for the State to serve as the individVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:03 May 25, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2115.IH H2115

jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2115 IH

1 ual’s residence for purposes of registering to vote in elec2 tions for Federal office, the authority shall notify the 

3 motor vehicle authority of the State identified by the indi4 vidual pursuant to subparagraph (A)(i), who shall notify 

5 the chief State election official of such State that the indi6 vidual no longer intends for that State to serve as the indi7 vidual’s residence for purposes of registering to vote in 

8 elections for Federal office.’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

10 subsection (a) shall take effect with respect to elections 

11 occurring in 2014 or any succeeding year. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[108th Congress Public Law 313]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ313.108]

[[Page 118 STAT. 1196]]

Public Law 108-313
108th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To provide for additional lands to be included within the boundary of 
the Johnstown Flood National Memorial in the State of Pennsylvania, and 
       for other purposes. <<NOTE: Oct. 5, 2004 -  [H.R. 1521]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress <<NOTE: Johnstown Flood National 
Memorial Boundary Adjustment Act of 2004. 16 USC 431 note.>> assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Johnstown Flood National Memorial 
Boundary Adjustment Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. BOUNDARY OF JOHNSTOWN FLOOD NATIONAL MEMORIAL.

    The boundary of the Johnstown Flood National Memorial (``Memorial'') 
is modified to include the area as generally depicted on the map 
entitled ``Johnstown Flood National Memorial, Cambria County, 
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania'', numbered N.E.R.O. 427/80,008 and dated 
June, 2003. The map shall be on file and available for inspection in the 
appropriate offices of the National Park Service, Department of the 
Interior.

SEC. 3. ACQUISITION OF LANDS.

    The Secretary of the Interior (``Secretary'') is authorized to 
acquire from willing sellers the land or interests in land as described 
in section 2 by donation, purchase with donated or appropriated funds, 
or exchange.

SEC. 4. ADMINISTRATION OF LANDS.

    Lands added to the Memorial by section 2 shall be administered by 
the Secretary as part of the Memorial in accordance with applicable laws 
and regulations.

[[Page 118 STAT. 1197]]

SEC. 5. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    In addition to amounts otherwise made available for land 
acquisition, there are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be 
necessary to carry out the purposes of this Act.

    Approved October 5, 2004.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1521:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 108-301 (Comm. on Resources).
SENATE REPORTS: No. 108-276 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 149 (2003):
                                    Oct. 15, considered and passed 
                                        House.
                                                        Vol. 150 (2004):
                                    Sept. 15, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than December 6, 2010.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:

                    1.                     *The James Blin Family (James Lee Blin and Randy Alan Blin, both of Independence, Iowa; Timothy Lee Blin, Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida; Sandra Blin Burgard, Bozeman, Montana; and Tamara Blin Diamond, Mesa, Arizona);*                     to retain control of voting shares of Independence Bancshares, Inc., Independence, Iowa, and thereby indirectly retain control of voting shares of Security State Bank, Independence, Iowa and Northeast Security Bank, Sumner, Iowa.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 16, 2010.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-29269 Filed 11-19-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P