alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

|CERTIFICATION OF                             
|---------------------------------------------
|CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER                      
|PURSUANT TO                                  
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                      
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John Boschert, Chief Financial Officer of Vitavea Inc. (the
Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for
      the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2007, and to which this certification
      is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                            

| | By:    | /s/
      John Boschert               
| | ------ | --------------------------------------
| | Name:  | JOHN BOSCHERT                         
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and
| |        | Secretary                             
| | Date:  | March 26, 2007                        

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the
Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
EXHIBIT 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. 3:96cr65/LAC

MARCUS TALLEY

 /

ORDER

Counsel for the defendant, in reply to the Government’s response to his motion to

dismiss the indictment, and with the assent of the Government, requests an order directing

a psychiatric or psychological examination of the defendant in accordance with Title 18,

United States Code, Section 4241, for the purpose of determining his mental condition and

competence to stand trial.

Accordingly, the Court hereby requires that defendant undergo said evaluation by the

appropriate personnel at FMC Rochester. In accordance with Title 18, United States Code,

Section 4247(c), a report of the examination shall be filed with the Court, with copies

provided to the counsel for the person examined and to the attorney for the Government, and

shall include:

(a) the person’s history and present symptoms;

(b) a description of the psychiatric, psychological, and medical tests that were

employed and the results;

(c) the examiner’s findings;

Case 3:96-cr-00065-LC-MD Document 632 Filed 01/30/06 Page 1 of 2
3:96cr65/ LAC Page 2 of 2

(d) the examiner’s opinion as to diagnosis and prognosis;

(e) the examiner’s opinion as to whether the defendant is suffering from a mental

disease or defect rendering him mentally incompetent to the extent that he is unable to

understand the nature and consequences of the proceedings against him, to assist properly

in his defense, or to knowingly enter a plea of guilty;

(f) the examiner’s opinion as to the exact nature and extent of any mental disease,

defect, or other mental condition that may bear upon the issues of guilt at the time of the

offense alleged in the Indictment;

(g) any recommendation the examiner may have as to how the mental condition of the

defendant should affect any sentence that may be imposed.

The examination shall be conducted and findings reported as soon as practicable.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. Defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment (doc. 629) is DENIED without

prejudice in light of the instant Order. 

ORDERED on this 30th day of January, 2006.

 s/L.A. Collier 

Lacey A. Collier

Senior United States District Judge

Case 3:96-cr-00065-LC-MD Document 632 Filed 01/30/06 Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

T.M. AND BRENDA TINKHAM

v.

JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS 

INC.;JOHNSON & JOHNSON; JANSSEN 

RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, LLC; AND 

EXCERPTA MEDICA, INC.;AND ELSEVIER 

INC.

PETITION OF: JANSSEN 

PHARMACEUTICALS INC., JOHNSON & 

JOHNSON; JANSSEN RESEARCH 

DEVELOPMENT, LLC

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 525 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 16th day of March, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2023-09-01T20:42:57-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
#### § 28.118 When no fee collected for new certificate or memorandum.

No fee shall be collected for a new cotton class certificate or memorandum issued in lieu of a prior certificate or memorandum solely for the purpose of correcting clerical errors therein, or for the purpose of substituting a new form applicable to outstanding certificates or memorandums, or without an application therefor.
**EXHIBIT 31.2****Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934**I, Christopher A. Black, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Commercial Lines Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosures controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over the financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.Date:November 10, 2005     /s/ Christopher A. Black  Christopher A. Black  Senior Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer
#### § 1221.18 Order.

*Order* means an order issued by the Secretary under section 514 of the Act that provides for a program of generic promotion, research, and information regarding agricultural commodities authorized under the Act.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 221 (Wednesday, November 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 70352]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28970]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

November 10, 2010.
    The Department of the Treasury will submit the following public 
information collection requirement to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 on or 
after the date of publication of this notice. A copy of the submission 
may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance Officer 
listed. Comments regarding these information collections should be 
addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the Treasury PRA Clearance 
Officer, Department of the Treasury, 1750 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 
Suite 11010, Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before December 17, 
2010 to be assured of consideration.

Financial Management Service (FMS)

    OMB Number: 1510-0059.
    Type of Review: Extension without change to a currently approved 
collection.
    Title: Authorization Agreement for Preauthorized Payment.
    Form: SF-5510.
    Abstract: Preauthorized payment is used by remitters (individuals 
and corporations) to authorize electronic funds transfers from the bank 
accounts maintained at financial institutions for government agencies 
to collect monies.
    Respondents: Individuals and households.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 25,000 hours.
    Bureau Clearance Officer: Wesley Powe, Financial Management 
Service, 3700 East West Highway, Room 144, Hyattsville, MD 20782; (202) 
874-8936.
    OMB Reviewer: Shagufta Ahmed, Office of Management and Budget, New 
Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503; (202) 395-
7873.

Dawn D. Wolfgang,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-28970 Filed 11-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-35-P
Exhibit 10.4

Compensation of Directors

      The Company provides cash compensation to non-employee directors for serving on the Company's Board of Directors or any of the Board's committees as follows:

		•	Annual Fee. Each non-employee director receives an annual fee for service on the Company's Board of Directors, payable in arrears in equal quarterly installments (on March 31st, June 30th, September 30th, and December 31st) and prorated as necessary to reflect service termination during the quarter. The annual fee for any given year is equal to 25,000 multiplied by one-third of the closing price of the Company's common stock on the Nasdaq Stock Market on December 31st of the previous year.
	 
		•	Meeting Fees. Each non-employee director is entitled to receive the following fees for participating in meetings of the Company's board and committees other than the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee:


	 
		•	$1,500 for attending each board meeting;
	 
		•	$500 for attending each committee meeting; and
	 
		•	$300 for participating in each board or committee conference call.


	 
		•	Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Fees. Due to the nature of their work, instead of receiving fees on a per-meeting or per-call basis, members of the Company's Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee receive a fee of $200 per hour for meetings, calls and interviews.
	 
		•	Audit Committee Chairman. In addition to the fees set forth above, the Chairman of the Audit Committee is paid a fee of $5,000 per quarter, to compensate him for the additional responsibilities and duties of that position.
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT




  The Board of Directors
  Research Frontiers Incorporated

  We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
  (No. 33-53030, 33-86910, 333-08623, 333-34163, 333-80575 and 333-63374)
  on Form S-8 and (No. 333-40369 and 333-65219 ) on Form S-3 of Research
  Frontiers Incorporated of our report dated February 21, 2003 relating to the
  consolidated balance sheets of Research Frontiers Incorporated and subsidiary
  as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 and the related consolidated statements of
  operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the
   three-year period ended December 31, 2002, which report appears in the
  December 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K of Research Frontiers
  Incorporated.


                              /s/ KPMG LLP
                                  KPMG LLP

  Melville, New York
  March 27, 2003
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. 3:96cr74/RV

3:03cv190RV/MD

DARRELL GREEN

ORDER

The defendant has filed a petition for certificate of appealability (doc. 566) and a

motion for extension of time to file motion for permission to appeal in forma pauperis. (Doc.

567). A certificate of appealability was previously denied because the defendant has not

made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. (Doc. 560). His renewed

request is denied. Likewise, the court previously determined that the defendant was not

entitled to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and he was directed to pay the $255.00

appellate filing fee, (doc. 570), so his motion for leave for extension of time to file motion

for leave to so proceed on appeal is also denied. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 26th day of May, 2005.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

Senior U.S. District Judge

Case 3:96-cr-00074-RV-EMT Document 568 Filed 05/26/05 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2059 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2059

   To amend title 10, United States Code, to ensure the issuance of 
regulations applicable to the Coast Guard regarding consideration of a 
request for a permanent change of station or unit transfer submitted by 
   a member of the Coast Guard who is the victim of a sexual assault.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 20, 2013

    Ms. Tsongas (for herself, Mr. Turner, Mr. Keating, Ms. Brown of 
   Florida, Ms. Kuster, Ms. Slaughter, Mr. Runyan, Ms. McCollum, Mr. 
McGovern, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Conyers, Ms. Pingree of Maine, Mr. Johnson 
of Ohio, and Ms. Jackson Lee) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 10, United States Code, to ensure the issuance of 
regulations applicable to the Coast Guard regarding consideration of a 
request for a permanent change of station or unit transfer submitted by 
   a member of the Coast Guard who is the victim of a sexual assault.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Coast Guard STRONG Act''.

SEC. 2. ISSUANCE OF REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO THE COAST GUARD REGARDING 
              CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR PERMANENT CHANGE OF STATION 
              OR UNIT TRANSFER BY VICTIM OF SEXUAL ASSAULT.

    Section 673(b) of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``The Secretaries of the military departments'' and inserting 
``The Secretary concerned''.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Notes: 1. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 83 FR 22178, May 14, 2018. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 83 FR 61310, Nov. 29, 2018 3. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 85 FR 65504, Oct. 15, 2020. 4. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 87 FR 44266, July 26, 2022.

Editorial Note on Subpart F of Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart F of part 2 appear at 60 FR 66713, Dec. 26, 1995.

§ 2.44 Administrator, Risk Management Agency and Manager, Federal Crop Insurance Corporation. ( a ) *Delegations.* Pursuant to § 2.16(a)(4), subject to reservations in § 2.16(b)(3), the following delegations of authority are made by the Under Secretary for Farm Production and Conservation to the Administrator, Risk Management Agency, and Manager Federal Crop Insurance Corporation: ( 1 ) Appoint such officers and employees as may be necessary for the transaction of the business of the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation and the Risk Management Agency.
( 2 ) Conduct pilot programs involving revenue insurance, risk management savings accounts, or the use of futures markets to manage risk and support farm income.
( 3 ) Provide education in management of the financial risks inherent in the production and marketing of agricultural commodities.
( 4 ) Conduct a study and issue a report on the efficacy and accuracy of the application of pack factors regarding the measurement of farm-stored production for purposes of providing policies or plans of insurance under the Federal Crop Insurance Act (7 U.S.C. 1501 *et seq.*).
( 5 ) Carry out functions relating to highly erodible land and wetland conservation under sections 1211-1213 and 1221-1223 of the Food Security Act of 1985, as amended (16 U.S.C. 3811-3813 and 3821-3823).
( 6 ) Prepare cropland reports as required by section 11014(c) of the Agricultural Act of 2013, Public Law 113-79.
( 7 ) Assist the Administrator, Economic Research Service with implementing section 10016 of the Agricultural Act of 2014 regarding locally or regionally produced agricultural food products (7 U.S.C. 2204h).
( 8 ) Administer the Federal Crop Insurance Act (7 U.S.C. 1501, *et seq.*), except for sections 524(a)(1)(B), (a)(3), and (b) (7 U.S.C. 1524(a)(1)(B), (a)(3), (b)) and 531 (7 U.S.C. 1531).
( 9 ) Coordinate with the Administrator, Farm Service Agency, on the type and format of data received under the noninsured crop assistance program authorized by Sec. 196 of the Federal Agriculture Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 (Pub. L 104-127, as amended) (7 U.S.C. 7333).
( b ) [Reserved]
[62 FR 19901, Apr. 24, 1997, as amended at 74 FR 3407, Jan. 21, 2009; 79 FR 44113, July 30, 2014; 83 FR 22188, May 14, 2018; 85 FR 65516, Oct. 15, 2020]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCTS

Case No. 3:19md2885

LIABILITY LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

McCombs, 7:20cv94

Judge M. Casey Rodgers

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones

DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS ORDER NO. 3

This Order also addresses Plaintiff’s objections and counter-designations to 

Defendants’ affirmative deposition designations and Defendants’ objections to 

Plaintiff’s counter-designations thereto for the following witness depositions:

1. Thompson, Zachary

SO ORDERED, on this 14th day of May, 2021.

M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 7:20-cv-00094-MCR-GRJ Document 117 Filed 05/14/21 Page 1 of 1
#### L. D. Bagel, Ltd., Respondent, v Home Insurance Co. et al., Appellants.

In an action to recover under two fire insurance policies, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 12, 1979, which denied their motion to vacate the summons and dismiss the complaint and deemed the complaint to have been properly served. Order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, and defendants’ motion granted, unless, within 30 days after service upon plaintiff of a copy of the order to be made hereon, together with notice of entry thereof, plaintiff shall complete and execute the transcript in question. In the event that plaintiff complies, then order affirmed, without costs or disbursements (see *Pogo Holding Corp. v New York Prop. Ins. Underwriting Assn.,*73 AD2d 605). Hopkins, J. P., Mangano, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
Presidential Documents

68673 

Federal Register 

Vol. 75, No. 215 

Monday, November 8, 2010 

Title 3— 

The President 

Notice of November 4, 2010 

Continuation of Emergency With Respect to Weapons of Mass 

Destruction 

On November 14, 1994, by Executive Order 12938, the President declared 

a national emergency with respect to the unusual and extraordinary threat 

to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States 

posed by the proliferation of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons 

(weapons of mass destruction) and the means of delivering such weapons. 

On July 28, 1998, the President issued Executive Order 13094 amending 

Executive Order 12938 to respond more effectively to the worldwide threat 

of weapons of mass destruction proliferation activities. On June 28, 2005, 

the President issued Executive Order 13382 which, inter alia, further amended Executive Order 12938 to improve our ability to combat proliferation. 

The proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering 

them continues to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national 

security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States; therefore, the 

national emergency first declared on November 14, 1994, and extended 

in each subsequent year, must continue. In accordance with section 202(d) 

of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 

1 year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 12938, as amended. 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to 

the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

November 4, 2010. 

[FR Doc. 2010–28335 

Filed 11–5–10; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 3195–W1–P 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with FR05OB#1.EPS</GPH>
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00764-CV

Frank and Guadalupe SEPULVEDA, 

Appellants

v.

John VELENTZAS,

Appellee

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2008-CI-11134

Honorable Peter Sakai, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM 

Sitting: Alma L. López, Chief Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 23, 2008

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

Appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed by November 12, 2008. No brief has been 

filed. On November 20, 2008, we ordered that appellant show cause in writing within fifteen 

days why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P.

38.8(a). We received no response. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM