alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exh 10.18-Form 10K-12/31/12



EXHIBIT 10.18

COMPENSATORY ARRANGEMENTS OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS

Each of our executive officers is employed on an at will basis. The current annual salaries of our executive officers are set forth in the chart below:

	
Executive Officers 
	
Title
	
Salary
	
Incentive Component

	
Robert E. Matthiessen
	
President, CEO and Director
	
$317,242
	
1.5% of consolidated pre-tax profits plus 1.5% of each product segment's pre-tax profits.

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Hugh T. Regan, Jr.
	
Secretary, Treasurer and CFO
	
$224,422
	
Discretionary (1)

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Daniel J. Graham
	
Sr. Vice President, General Manager - Mechanical Products Segment and General Manager-Electrical Products Segment
	
$220,000
	
2.5% of pre-tax profits of the Mechanical Products segment and 2.5% of pre-tax profits of the Electrical Products segment

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
James Pelrin
	
Vice President and General Manager-Thermal Products Segment
	
$220,000
	
2.5% of pre-tax profits of the Thermal Products segment.

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Alyn R. Holt
	
Executive Chairman
	
$180,180
	
None

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 





	
(1)
	
Subject to the company having consolidated pre-tax profits and subject to the recommendation of the Chief Executive Officer and the approval of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors.




Each of the foregoing officers receives our standard benefits package. Messrs. Matthiessen, Regan, Graham and Pelrin are parties to Change of Control Agreements with us that provide for the payment of certain benefits upon the executive's termination of employment following a change of control, as defined therein. 



Directors who are not also our officers (each a "non-employee director") currently receive an annual retainer of $25,000 (Steven J. Abrams, Esq., Stuart F. Daniels, Ph.D., William Kraut, and James W. Schwartz, Esq.). Non-employee members of the Executive Committee are paid an additional annual retainer of $15,000 (Dr. Daniels and Mr. Schwartz). The chairmen of the committees of the Board are paid an additional annual fee as follows: the Chairman of the Audit Committee is paid an additional annual fee of $15,000 (Mr. Kraut); the Chairman of the Compensation Committee is paid an additional annual fee of $10,000 (Dr. Daniels); the Chairman of the Intellectual Property Committee is paid an additional annual fee of $75,000 (Dr. Daniels); and the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is paid an additional annual fee of $10,000 (Mr. Schwartz).



On January 8, 2013, Messrs. Kraut and Abrams were elected as directors by the Board of Directors to fill vacancies following the deaths of two of our prior directors, and each of the new directors was granted 10,000 shares of restricted stock. These shares were issued pursuant to the Company's 2007 Stock Plan (incorporated by reference as Exhibit 10.6 to this Report) and will vest in increments of 25% annually over four years beginning January 8, 2014.
**Exhibit 11.1**

 

**MLMacadamia Orchards, L.P.**

**Computationof Net Income (Loss) per Class A Unit**

(inthousands, except per unit data)

 
| ** **                                              | ** ** | **2008** | ** ** | **2007** | ** ** | **2006** | ** ** |
|---------------------------------------------------------|------------|----------|------------|----------|------------|----------|------------|
|                                                    |       |     |       |     |       |     |       |
| Net income (loss)                                       |       | $        | 68         |     | $          | (3,965   | )          | $ | 804 |   |
|                                                    |       |     |       |     |       |     |       |
| Class A Unitholders (ownership percentage)         |       | x        | 100        | %        | x          | 100      | %          | x | 100 | % |
|                                                    |       |     |       |     |       |     |       |
| Net income (loss) allocable to Class A Unitholders |       | $        | 68         |     | $          | (3,965   | )          | $ | 804 |   |
|                                                    |       |     |       |     |       |     |       |
| Class A Units outstanding                          |       | 7,500    |       | 7,500    |       | 7,500    |       |
|                                                    |       |     |       |     |       |     |       |
| Net income (loss) per Class A Unit                 |       | $        | 0.01       |     | $          | (0.53    | )          | $ | 0.11 |   |

** **

----
#### § 15.83 Notice of opportunity to request a hearing and response thereto.

A notice of opportunity to request a hearing shall set a date not less than 20 days from service of said notice within which the applicant or recipient may file a request for a hearing, or may wiave a hearing and submit written information and argument for the record, in which case, the applicant or recipient shall have the right to further participate in the proceeding. When the applicant or recipient elects to file a request for a hearing, a time shall be set for the hearing at a date not less than 20 days from the date applicant or recipient is notified of the date set for the hearing. Failure of the applicant or recipient to request a hearing or to appear at the date set shall be deemed a waiver of the right to a hearing, under section 602 of the Act and the regulations in this part and consent to the making of a decision on such information as is available which may be presented for the record.
#### § 1910.51 Purpose.

This subpart prescribes the policies and procedures of Rural Development for individual and joint type credit reports. Credit reports will be ordered to determine the eligibility of applicants requesting Rural Development loans. A nonrefundable fee will be charged the applicant. This subpart is inapplicable to Farm Service Agency, Farm Loan Programs.

[80 FR 9870, Feb. 24, 2015]
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2076 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to conduct a review of the Integrated 

Disability Evaluation System of the Armed Forces and to submit to 

Congress a report on such system. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 21, 2013 

Mr. KLINE (for himself, Mr. WALZ, Mrs. BACHMANN, Mr. PETERSON, and 

Mr. ELLISON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to conduct a review of 

the Integrated Disability Evaluation System of the 

Armed Forces and to submit to Congress a report on 

such system. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Servicemember Med5 ical Evaluations Review Act’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2076 IH

1 SEC. 2. REVIEW OF INTEGRATED DISABILITY EVALUATION 

2 SYSTEM. 

3 (a) REVIEW.—The Secretary of Defense shall con4 duct a review of the backlog of pending cases in the Inte5 grated Disability Evaluation System. 

6 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

7 of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit 

8 to the Committees on Armed Services of the House of 

9 Representatives and the Senate a report on the review 

10 under subsection (a). Such report shall include the fol11 lowing: 

12 (1) The number of pending cases that exist as 

13 of the date of the report, listed by military depart14 ment, component, and, with respect to the National 

15 Guard, State. 

16 (2) As of the date of the report, the average 

17 time it takes to process a case in the Integrated Dis18 ability Evaluation System. 

19 (3) A description of the steps the Secretary will 

20 take to resolve the backlog of cases in the Integrated 

21 Disability Evaluation System. 

22 (4) With respect to each military department, 

23 the date by which the Secretary plans to resolve 

24 such backlog. 

25 (5) The progress and estimated cost of moving 

26 the Integrated Disability Evaluation System to an 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2076 IH

1 integrated and readily accessible electronic format 

2 that a member of the Armed Forces may access and 

3 see the status of the member during each phase of 

4 the system. 

5 (6) An assessment by the Secretary of the feasi6 bility of improving in-transit visibility of pending 

7 cases, including by establishing a method of tracking 

8 a pending case when a military treatment facility is 

9 assigned a packet and pending case for action of a 

10 member. 

11 (c) PENDING CASE DEFINED.—In this section, the 

12 term ‘‘pending case’’ means a case where a member of 

13 the Armed Forces who, as of the date of the review under 

14 subsection (a), is within the Integrated Disability Evalua15 tion System and has been referred to a medical evaluation 

16 board. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of operations
pages 17 and 18 of the Company's Form 10-K for the year end
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          17,349
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,730
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,371
<INVENTORY>                                        205
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,212
<PP&E>                                          45,829
<DEPRECIATION>                                  40,866
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  37,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,717
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        187
<COMMON>                                           175
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,057
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    37,900
<SALES>                                         18,820
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                64,823
<CGS>                                            7,502
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,104
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                54,624 <F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   304
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (29,550) <F1>
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (29,550) <F1>
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (29,550) <F1>
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.70)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.70)
<FN>
<F1>


</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**Certification**

 

I,Tony Aquila, Chief Executive Officer of Solera Holdings, Inc., certifythat:

 

1. Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Solera Holdings, Inc.;

 

2. Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant andhave:

 

(a) Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: February 13,2008

 
|       |       |                        |
|------------|------------|-----------------------------|
|       |       | /s/ Tony Aquila             |
| ** ** | ** ** | **Tony Aquila**             |
| ** ** | ** ** | **Chief Executive Officer** |

 

----
#### The People of the State of Illinois, defendant in error, v. Nicholas Pappas, plaintiff in error.

Gen. No. 33,180.

Opinion filed May 29, 1929.

Prank C. Hill, for plaintiff in error. John A. Swanson, State’s Attorney, for defendant in error; Edw. E. Wilson, Assistant State’s Attorney, of counsel.

Mr. Justice Wilson

delivered the opinion of the court.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Annual Report of Datawatch Corporation (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-K for
      the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert W. Hagger,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
      1350,
      as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








/s/
              Robert W. Hagger
              Robert
                W. Hagger
              Chief
                Executive Officer
              December
                31, 2007
Exhibit B

Case 4:20-cv-00110-MW-MAF Document 9-3 Filed 04/06/20 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
 
                                   EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Candela Corporation on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-18932,  33-29291,  33-35091,  33-
37696,  33-37697,  33-37698,  33-55596  and  33-73040) of our report dated
August 5, 1997, except as to the information presented in Note 6, for which the 
date is September 12, 1997, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements and financial statement schedule of Candela Corporation as of June
28, 1997 and June 29, 1996, and for each of the three years in the period ended
June 28, 1997, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



Boston, Massachusetts              COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
September 22, 1997
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2009 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 192
113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2009

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 9, 2013

                                Received

                           September 17, 2013

                          Read the first time

                           September 18, 2013

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To prohibit the Secretary of the Treasury from enforcing the Patient 
 Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education 
                      Reconciliation Act of 2010.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Keep the IRS Off Your Health Care 
Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds the following:
            (1) On May 10, 2013, the Internal Revenue Service admitted 
        that it singled out advocacy groups, based on ideology, seeking 
        tax-exempt status.
            (2) This action raises pertinent questions about the 
        agency's ability to implement and oversee Public Law 111-148 
        and Public Law 111-152.
            (3) This action could be an indication of future Internal 
        Revenue Service abuses in relation to Public Law 111-148 and 
        Public Law 111-152 given that it is their responsibility to 
        enforce a key provision, the individual mandate.
            (4) Americans accept the principle that patients, families, 
        and doctors should be making medical decisions, not the Federal 
        Government.

SEC. 3. PROHIBITING ENFORCEMENT OF PPACA AND HCERA.

    The Secretary of the Treasury, or any delegate of the Secretary, 
shall not implement or enforce any provisions of or amendments made by 
Public Law 111-148 or 111-152.

            Passed the House of Representatives August 2, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
                                                       Calendar No. 192

113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 2009

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To prohibit the Secretary of the Treasury from enforcing the Patient 
 Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education 
                      Reconciliation Act of 2010.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 18, 2013

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:96cr74-01/RV

DARRELL GREEN

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Roger Vinson on June 20, 2005

Motion/Pleadings: Motion pursuant to Rule 60(a) to amend clerical mistake in Judgment and

Commitment Order 

Filed by Defendant on 6/2/2005 Doc.# 576 

RESPONSES:

Government on6/17/05 Doc.# 578

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

 Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

 s/Jerry Marbut

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Jerry Marbut

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 16th day of

 August , 2005, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) See the Government’s Response (doc. 578). 

(c) The $1,000.00 fine was to be paid through the Bureau of Prisons’ Inmate

Financial Responsibility Program “if employed while in prison and able to make

such payments.”

 /s/ Roger Vinson

ROGER VINSON

United States District Judge

Case 3:96-cr-00074-RV-EMT Document 587 Filed 08/16/05 Page 1 of 1
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT KEE LEE, DB A C hin’ s M arke t a nd Kitc he n, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A, De fe nda

nt - Appe lle e . No. 13-15434 D.C . No. 1:11-c v-00881-AW ISAB M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Ea ste rn Distric t of C a lifornia Anthony W . Ishii, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d

Nove m b e r 18, 2015 ** B e fore : TASHIM A , OW ENS, a nd FRIEDLAND, C irc uit Judge s. Ke e Le e , DB A C hin’ s M arke t a nd Kitc he n, a

ppe a ls pro se from

the distric t c ourt’ s sum

m ary judgm e nt in his 7 U.S.C . § 2023 a c tion se e king judic ia l re vie w of the U nite d State s De pa

rtm e nt of Agric ulture Food a nd Nutrition Servic e ’ s (“ FNS” )



# FIL ED DEC 01 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).fina l de c i sion pe rm ane ntly disqua lify ing his store

from pa rtic ipating in the

fe de ra l food sta m p progra m . W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie w de novo the distric t c ourt’ s le ga l c onc lusions a nd for c le ar e rror its fa c tua l findings. W ong v . Unite d State

s , 859 F.2d 129, 131 (9th C i r. 1988). W e a ffirm . The distric t c ourt prope rly grante d sum

m a ry judgm e nt be c a

use Le e fa ile d to ra ise a ge nuine disputeof m at e ria l fa c t a s to whe t he r the hundre ds of suspic ious transa c tions ide ntifie d by FNS did not show tha

t Le e wa s tra ffic k ing in food sta m p s. S e e 7 U.S.C . § 2021(b)(3)(B ) (providing for pe rm ane nt disqua l ific ation from pa rtic ipation in the

fe de ra l food sta

m p progra m on the first oc c a sion of tra ffic king); 7 C . F.R . § 271.2 (de fining tra ffic king a s “ [t] he buy i ng, se lling, ste a ling, or otherwise e ffe c ting a n e xc ha nge of [food sta

m p] be ne fits issue d a

nd a c c e sse d . . . for c a sh or c o n side ra tion othe r tha n e ligiblefood . . . . ” ); s e e also K im v . Unite d State s , 121 F.3d 1269, 1272 (9th C ir. 1997) (“ The burde n is pla c e d upon the s tore owne r to prove by a pre ponde ranc e of the e vide nc e tha t the viola tions did not oc c ur.” ). AFFIRM E D.

1 3 - 1 5 4 3 4 2
Exhibit
10.4


 


On March 9, 2005, Cornell Companies, Inc.
(the “Company”) and Harry J. Phillips, Jr. entered into an oral agreement to
continue Mr. Phillips’ status as an employee of the Company.  Pursuant to the oral agreement, Mr. Phillips
will receive an annual salary of $70,000 and will assist with special projects
in order to facilitate the transition to the Company’s new Chief Executive
Officer.
#### §§ 1784.12-1784.15 [Reserved]