alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 27.31 Classification of cotton.

For purposes of subsection 15b (f) of The Act, classification of cotton is the determination of the quality of a sample in accordance with the Universal Cotton Standards (the official cotton standards of the United States) for the color grade and leaf grade of American upland cotton, and fiber property measurements such as micronaire. High Volume Instruments will determine all fiber property measurements except extraneous matter. High Volume Instrument colormeter measurements will be used for determining the official color grade. Cotton classers authorized by the Cotton and Tobacco Programs will determine the presence of extraneous matter and authorized employees of the Cotton and Tobacco Programs will determine all fiber property measurements using High Volume Instruments.

[77 FR 20504, Apr. 5, 2012]
#### MARINE MFG. & SUPPLY CO., Respondent, v. PERRY, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 12, 1906.)

In the matter of supplementary proceedings in Marine Manufacturing & Supply Company against Robert Perry.

No opinion. Order of the County Court of Queens County affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
Exhibit 10.1(bs)


 


AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO


TO


FACTORY PENSION PLAN


OF


SAUER-DANFOSS (LASALLE)


AND


INTERNATIONAL UNION,


UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND


AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS


OF
AMERICA, AND ITS LOCAL UNION NO. 285


 


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the attached Appendix D is hereby
added to the Factory Pension Plan of Sauer-Danfoss (LaSalle) and International
Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of
America and its Local Union No. 285, executed this 8th day of
February, 2002, to be effective as of January 1, 2002.


 


	
  SAUER DANFOSS COMPANY

  	
   

  	
  UAW, Local Union No. 285

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ MATTHEW K. BENDLER

  	
   

  	
  /s/ WILLIAM C. FALASSI

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ SUZANNE R. SOBKOWIAK

  	
   

  	
  /s/  PATRICIO
  ESCATEL

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  



 


 


 





















 


APPENDIX D


 


FACTORY PENSION PLAN


OF


SAUER-DANFOSS (LASALLE)


AND


INTERNATIONAL UNION,


UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND


AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS


OF
AMERICA, AND ITS LOCAL UNION NO. 285


 


 


Application of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief 


Reconciliation Act of 2001


 


 


This Appendix D is intended to demonstrate good faith compliance with
the requirements of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of
2001 (“EGTRRA”) and is to be construed in accordance with EGTRRA and the
guidance issued thereunder.  The provisions
of this Appendix D shall supersede the applicable provisions of the Plan to the
extent those provisions are inconsistent with the provisions of this
Supplement.


 


1.             Effective
Date.  Except as
otherwise provided, this amendment shall be effective as of the first day of
the first Plan Year beginning after December 31, 2001.


 


2.             Limits
on Annual Benefits.  Effective for
“limitation years” ending after December 31, 2001 and consistent with the
provisions of Article XI of the Plan, Plan shall be subject to the applicable
provisions of Code Section 415 (b) as amended by EGTRRA.


 


3.             Rollover
Rules - Direct Rollovers of Plan Distributions.  Effective for Plan distributions made after
December 31, 2001, the provisions of Code Section 402(c) that are incorporated
under Section 9.7 of the Plan are modified to provide that an “eligible
retirement plan” shall also mean an annuity contract described in Code Section
403(b) or an eligible plan under Code Section 457(b) that is maintained by a
state, political subdivision of a state, or any agency or instrumentality of a
state or political subdivision of a state and that agrees to separately account
for amounts transferred into such plan from this Plan.  Notwithstanding subsection 9.7(b) of the
Plan, the definition of “eligible retirement plan” shall also apply in the case
of a distribution to a Spouse or a former spouse who is the alternate payee
under a qualified domestic relation order, as defined in Code Section 414(p).
2006-0891.

#### Brown v. State.

Lucas App. No. L-05-1050, 2006-Ohio-1393. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. Upon consideration of appellee’s motion to strike appellant’s notice of appeal and memorandum in support of jurisdiction,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, sua sponte, that appellee may file a memorandum in response to appellant’s memorandum in support of jurisdiction within 30 days of the date of this entry.
Editorial Note on Part 1956
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1956 appear at 80 FR 9901, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1956.110 Joint debtors. Settlements may not be approved for one joint debtor unless approved for all debtors. Joint debtors includes all parties, individuals, and organizations, who are legally liable for payment of the debt. ( a ) Individual settlement offers from joint debtors can be accepted and processed only as a joint offer. A separate Form RD 1956-1 will be completed by each debtor unless the debtors are members of the same family and all necessary financial information on each debtor can be shown clearly on a single application.
( b ) If one of the joint debtors is deceased or has received a discharge of the debt in bankruptcy, or if the whereabouts of one of the debtors is unknown, or it is otherwise impossible or impractical to obtain the signature of the debtor, the application for settlement may be accepted without that debtor's signature if it contains adequate information on each of the debtors to justify settlement of the debt as to each of the debtors. The name of the debtor requesting settlement will be shown at the top of Form RD 1956-1 followed by name and status of the other debtor. For example, “John Doe, joint debtor with Jane Doe, deceased.”
( c ) Joint debtors must be advised in writing that all debtors will remain liable for the balance of the debt until any payment(s) due under the joint offer have been made.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1942-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2010-0002]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of North Carolina (FEMA-1942-DR), dated October 14, 2010, and related determinations.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         November 1, 2010.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peggy Miller, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of North Carolina is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of October 14, 2010.

Camden, Martin, New Hanover and Washington Counties for Individual Assistance.

                        The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used                               ( print page 70019)                            for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.                    

W. Craig Fugate,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2010-28837 Filed 11-15-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2112 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.2112

                     One Hundred Thirteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 787 State Route 17M in Monroe, New York, as the ``National Clandestine 
   Service of the Central Intelligence Agency NCS Officer Gregg David 
                     Wenzel Memorial Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. NATIONAL CLANDESTINE SERVICE OF THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE 
AGENCY NCS OFFICER GREGG DAVID WENZEL MEMORIAL POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 787 State Route 17M in Monroe, New York, shall be known and 
designated as the ``National Clandestine Service of the Central 
Intelligence Agency NCS Officer Gregg David Wenzel Memorial Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``National 
Clandestine Service of the Central Intelligence Agency NCS Officer 
Gregg David Wenzel Memorial Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### §§ 25.504-25.999 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 32.2

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ruths Chris Steak
House, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 26, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas J. Pennison, Jr., Senior Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
indicated.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

May 3, 2006



/s/ Thomas J. Pennison, Jr.Thomas J. Pennison, Jr.Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Ruths Chris Steak House, Inc. and will be retained by
Ruths Chris Steak House, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Leonard Giordano, Appellant.

Case held, decision reserved and matter remitted to Erie County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: Defendant was convicted of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the sixth degree (Penal Law, former § 220.06) and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the sixth degree (Penal Law, former § 220.31), both class D felonies. Defendant contends that he was denied his right to a speedy trial, in violation of CPL 30.30 and that the sentence imposed upon him was improper. Defendant was indicted for these crimes on January 20, 1978. At the arraignment, on March 17, 1978, the People called the case ready for trial, and the defense was granted a 45-day adjournment for motions. A motion to dismiss the indictment for lack of a speedy trial was denied by the court on April 9, 1979, and the case proceeded to trial on the same day. Where the defendant has made a prima facie showing of undue delay, the.People have the burden of demonstrating why they are not chargeable for delay in excess of the six-month period provided by CPL 30.30 (subd 1, par [a]) *(People v Sturgis,*38 NY2d 625; *People v Rivera,*72 AD2d 922; *People v Cook,*63 AD2d 842). Here, over 14 months passed between defendant’s indictment and trial. The court denied defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of a speedy trial without making findings concerning the People’s readiness to proceed or the availability of statutory periods of exclusion (CPL 30.30, subd 4). Though the People assert on appeal that they were ready for trial within the six-month period, there *825are insufficient facts before us to determine whether this is so. The matter should be remitted to the trial court to conduct a hearing and make appropriate findings as to whether the People were, in fact, ready for trial within the period (CPL 30.30, subd 1, par [a]), and as to the applicability of statutory periods of exclusion (CPL 30.30, subd 4) (see *People v Rivera,*64 AD2d 815; *People v Del Valle,*63 AD2d 830). In sentencing for a class D felony, the trial court may impose either an indeterminate sentence with a maximum of not more than seven years, and a minimum of at least one year (Penal Law, § 70.00, subd 2, par [d], subd 3) or a definite sentence with a fixed term of one year or less (Penal Law, § 70.00, subd 4). The trial court sentenced defendant to "a term of up to one year”. Since this sentence does not comport with either of the sentencing alternatives set forth in section 70.00 of the Penal Law, we must also remit for resentencing in accordance with the requirements of that section. (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court—criminal sale of a controlled substance, sixth degree.) Present—Simons, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Doerr, Witmer and Moule, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1951

#### Editorial Notes:

1. Some of the exhibits referenced in this part 1951 are not published in the Code of Federal Regulations. Exhibits are available in any Rural Development office.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1951 appear at 80 FR 9890-9894, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### §§ 1951.898-1951.899 [Reserved]
§ 201.36b Name of kind and variety; designation as hybrid. ( a ) The representation of the name of a kind or kind and variety of seed in any advertisement subject to the Act shall be confined to the name of the kind or kind and variety determined in accordance with § 201.34. The name shall not have associated therewith words or terms that create a misleading impression as to the history or characteristics of the kind or kind and variety. Descriptive terms and firm names may be used in kind or variety names provided the descriptive terms or firm names are a part of the name or variety of seed; for example, Stringless Green Pod, Detroit Dark Red, Black Seeded Simpson and Henderson Bush Lima. Seed shall not be designated as hybrid seed in any advertisement subject to the Act unless it comes within the definition of “hybrid” in § 201.2(y).
( b ) Terms descriptive as to color, shape, size, habit of growth, disease-resistance, or other characteristics of the kind or variety may be associated with the name of the kind or variety provided it is done in a manner which clearly indicates the descriptive term is not a part of the name of the kind or variety; for example, Oshkosh pepper (yellow), Copenhagen Market (round head) cabbage, and Kentucky Wonder (pole) garden bean.
( c ) Terms descriptive of quality or origin and terms descriptive of the basis for representations made may be associated with the name of the kind or variety: *Provided,* That the terms are clearly identified as being other than part of the name of the kind or variety; for example, Fancy quality redtop, Idaho origin alfalfa, and Grower's affidavit of variety Atlas sorghum.
( d ) Terms descriptive of the manner or method of production or processing the seed (for example, certified, registered, delinted, scarified, treated, and hulled), may be associated with the name of the kind or variety of seed, providing such terms are not misleading.
( e ) Brand names and terms taken from trademarks may be associated with the name of the kind or variety of seed as an indication of source: *Provided,* That the terms are clearly identified as being other than a part of the name of the kind or variety; for example, Ox Brand Golden Cross sweet corn. Seed shall not be advertised under a trademark or brand name in any manner that may create the impression that the trademark or brand name is a variety name. If seed advertised under a trademark or brand name is a mixture of varieties and if the variety names are not stated in the advertising, a description similar to a varietal description or a comparison with a named variety shall not be used if it creates the impression that the seed is of a single variety.
[21 FR 4652, June 27, 1956, as amended at 32 FR 12780, Sept. 6, 1967; 59 FR 64491, Dec. 14, 1994; 85 FR 40580, July 7, 2020]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-73,963]

                    By application dated July 16, 2010, a petitioner requested administrative reconsideration of the negative determination regarding workers' eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The determination was issued on June 22, 2010. The Department's Notice of Determination was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on July 7, 2010 (75 FR 39049). Workers are engaged in employment related to the production of dental prosthetics.                

The initial determination was based on the findings that worker separations are not attributable to increased imports of articles like or directly competitive with dental prosthetics or a shift/acquisition of these articles to a foreign country by the workers' firm.

In the request for reconsideration, the petitioner provided additional information regarding company imports and operations.

The Department has carefully reviewed the request for reconsideration and the existing record and has determined that the Department will conduct further investigation to determine if the workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.

## Conclusion

After careful review of the application, I conclude that the claim is of sufficient weight to justify reconsideration of the U.S. Department of Labor's prior decision. The application is, therefore, granted.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of August, 2010.

Del Min Amy Chen,

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2010-28491 Filed 11-10-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
#### § 1718.50 Definitions.

Unless otherwise indicated, terms used in this subpart are defined as set forth in 7 CFR 1710.2.