alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

###### Office of the Secretary

Notice is hereby given that I have delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs the authorities vested in the Secretary of Health and Human Services under section 4 of the Federal Cigarette Labeling and Advertising Act (FCLAA)(15 U.S.C. 1333), as amended by the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (Tobacco Control Act).

These authorities may be redelegated. These authorities shall be exercised under the Department's policy on regulations and the existing delegation of authority to approve and issue regulations.

I hereby ratify and affirm any actions taken by the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, or other FDA officials, which involved the exercise of the authorities delegated herein prior to the effective date of this delegation. This delegation is effective upon date of signature.

Dated: November 9, 2010.

Kathleen Sebelius,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-29150 Filed 11-18-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Section 906Certification**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), the undersigned officer ofCentennial Bank Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifiesthat the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated:May 7, 2008

 

 
|   | /s/   Paul  W. Taylor |
|--------|--------------------------------------|
|   | Name:                                | Paul  W. Taylor |
|   | Title:                               | *Chief  Financial Officer* |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnishedsolely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C. Section 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as aseparate disclosure document.

 

----
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1991 

To require the Secretary of Education to verify that individuals have made 

a commitment to serve in the Armed Forces or in public service, or 

otherwise are a borrower on an eligible loan which has been submitted 

to a guaranty agency for default aversion or is already in default, 

before such individuals obtain a consolidation loan for purposes specified 

under section 455(o) of the Higher Education Act of 1965. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 15, 2013 

Mr. ANDREWS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Education to verify that individuals have made a commitment to serve in the Armed 

Forces or in public service, or otherwise are a borrower 

on an eligible loan which has been submitted to a guaranty agency for default aversion or is already in default, 

before such individuals obtain a consolidation loan for 

purposes specified under section 455(o) of the Higher 

Education Act of 1965. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 1991 IH

1 SECTION 1. REQUIRED VERIFICATION. 

2 Section 428C of the Higher Education Act of 1965 

3 (20 U.S.C. 1078–3) is amended— 

4 (1) in subsection (a)(3)(B)(i)(V)(aa), by insert5 ing before the period at the end the following: ‘‘in 

6 a case in which the Secretary verifies that the indi7 vidual is currently eligible for income contingent re8 payment or income-based repayment and that the 

9 loan(s) in question have been submitted to the guar10 anty agency for default aversion or if the loan is al11 ready in default’’; 

12 (2) in subsection (a)(3)(B)(i)(V)(bb), by insert13 ing before the period at the end the following: ‘‘in 

14 a case in which the Secretary verifies with docu15 mentation that the individual is, at the time of the 

16 application, employed in a public service job, as that 

17 term is defined in section 455(m)(3)’’; 

18 (3) in subsection (a)(3)(B)(i)(V)(cc), by insert19 ing before the period at the end the following: ‘‘in 

20 a case in which the Secretary verifies that the indi21 vidual is a member of a regular or reserve compo22 nent of the Armed Forces by contacting the Sec23 retary of the military department or the Secretary of 

24 Homeland Security, as the case may be, having ju25 risdiction over the Armed Force in which the indi26 vidual claims to be a member’’; and 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•HR 1991 IH

1 (4) in subsection (b)(5), by inserting after the 

2 second sentence the following: ‘‘In addition, the Sec3 retary shall not offer any loans offered under this 

4 paragraph unless the Secretary has received 

5 verification described in subsection (a)(3)(B)(i)(V) 

6 (aa)–(cc), as applicable.’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
800 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, DC 20591

March 11, 2013

Mr. Mark Perez de Tejada

1102 White Oak Court Port Byron, IL 61275

Dear Mr. Perez de Tejada:

This is in response to your January 1 5, 2013, letter sent to the public docket (No. FAA-2013-0105) petitioning th e Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to initiate rulemaking to restrict the age of part 135 pilots to a maximum of 65 years of age.

In accordance with 14 CFR § 11.73, the FAA mu st use the following criteria when making a decision as to whether or not to amend current regulations based on a petition for rulemaking:

1) The immediacy of the safety or security concerns you raise;

2) The priority of other issues the FAA must deal with; and

3) The resources we have availa ble to address these issues.

The FAA has a priority list for rulemaking that addresses many issues that are crucial to the safety of the aviation community and the traveling public. The FAA must prioritize its limited rulemaking resources so as to delive r the most value to the aviation system as a whole. After reviewing your request, we have determined that the i ssue you raise is not an immediate safety concern and wo uld not be in the public interest.

For the reasons above, we deny your petition for rulemaking in accordance with 14 CFR § 11.73. However, should the FAA initi ate a rulemaking project in the future on this subject your le tter will be considered at that time.

Sincerely,

/s/

Michael J. Zenkovich Acting Deputy Director, Flight Standards

Service
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2015 8:46 AM

To: 'brian.dyer@remotepilotsystems.com'

Cc: Cooper, Thuy (FAA); Pappas, Rob (FAA); Scha ndler, Andrea (FAA); Pearson, Lakisha

(FAA) Subject: Request for Additional Information



### March 4, 2015

Mr. Brian Dyer Remote Pilot Systems LLC

200 Barr Harbor Drive West Conshohocken, PA 19428

Dear Mr. Dyer:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2014-1086). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Your petition references the materials listed below, however the materials were not submitted for the record. Please provide a copy of the following referenced materials:

o Aibot X-6 User Manual

o Boyd Flight Operations Manual

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Hea dquarters or electronically via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If you want us to process your request a ny further, we must receive the information described above by March 18, 2015. If we do not receiv e the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Nia Daniels Program Analyst

Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075 nia.daniels@faa.gov2
Order entered June 10, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-00946-CR

TIONA EVANS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F12-55243-Q

ORDER

In this case, appellant raises an issue related to the costs assessed against him. The 

record, however, does not contain a cost bill or other document with an itemized list of costs 

assessed in this case.

Accordingly, we ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within FIFTEEN 

DAYS of the date of this order, a supplemental clerk’s record containing a detailed itemization 

of the costs assessed in this case, including but not limited to, specific court costs, fees, and court 

appointed attorney fees. We further ORDER that the supplemental clerk’s record include a 

document explaining any and all abbreviations used to designate a particular fee, cost, or court 

appointed attorney fee.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the 

Gary Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk; Dallas County District Clerk’s Office, Criminal 

Records Division; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions), 52.8(d) (“W hen 1

denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so.”)

NUMBER 13-09-00079-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

 

IN RE: MARIA KAZERANI

 

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

and Motion for Temporary Relief and Stay of Proceedings

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam1

Relator, Maria Kazerani, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in which she requests

that this Court direct respondent, the Honorable Ricardo Rodriguez, presiding judge of the

92nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, to vacate the trial court’s order denying

relator’s request for jury trial. Relator also filed a motion for temporary relief and stay of

proceedings.

This Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus

and the motion for temporary relief and stay of proceedings, is of the opinion that relator

has not shown herself entitled to the relief sought and the petition and motion should be
2

denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus and

motion for temporary relief and stay of proceedings are DENIED.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and 

filed this the 13th day of February, 2009.
Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation and Benefits



 Exhibit 10(y) 
  
 NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION 
  
 Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation and Benefits 

Effective July 28, 2004 
  

				
	 Description

	  	Amount


		
	 Attendance Fees (per meeting)
	  	 	 
		
	 Board or Committee Meeting
	  	$	1,500
		
	 Annual Cash Retainer
	  	 	 
		
	 Payable quarterly in arrears
	  	$	40,000
		
	 Audit Committee Retainer
	  	 	 
		
	 Payable quarterly in arrears
	  	$	5,000
		
	 Lead Director Retainer
	  	 	 
		
	 Payable quarterly in arrears
	  	$	5,000
		
	 Annual Stock Award
	  	$	25,000

  
 Pursuant to the 2000
Non-Employee Directors Stock Plan, $25,000 worth of Newmont stock payable following election/re-election as a director by the stockholders or at the time of appointment as a director by the Board. The stock awards will be increased to $50,000,
contingent upon stockholder approval of the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan at the April 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. 
  
 Committee Chairman Retainers 
  
 The Chairman of each standing committee of the Board will receive an annual cash retainer, paid quarterly in arrears, in the amount of $15,000 for the
Chairman of the Audit Committee and $5,000 for the Chairman of each of the other committees. 
  
 Charitable Gift Programs 
  

				
	 Matching Charitable Gift Program
	  	 	 
	 Qualified cultural or charitable organizations or hospitals
	  	$	2,500 per year
	 Qualified educational organization
	  	$	5,000 per year
	 Non-Matching Charitable Gift Program
	  	 	 
	 Contribution to be made in your name by Newmont to a qualified
educational or charitable organization
	  	$	2,500 per year








 Retirement 
  
 On retirement, at any time after attaining age 65, a director who was serving on the Board on January 27, 1999, and who is not entitled to a pension under
Newmont’s pension plan, and who has served for at least ten consecutive years as a director of Newmont Mining Corporation or Newmont Gold Company, is entitled to be paid an annual sum of $50,000 for life. 
  

 2
Exhibit 31.1

                                CERTIFICATION
          Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


I, Frank DeRenzo, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Western Gaming
      Corporation;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
    statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
    make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
    statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
    this annual report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
    information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
    material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
    cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
    this annual report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
    establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
    in Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
    amended) for the registrant and have:

    a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
    information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
    particularly during the period in which this annual report is being
    prepared;

    b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
    procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
    annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

    c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
    effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
    evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
    our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
    committee of the registrant's board of directors:

    a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
    controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
    process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
    registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

    b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
    employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;
    and

6.  The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
    annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
    controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
    controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
    corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
    weaknesses.

Dated:  December 8, 2003

/s/Frank DeRenzo
----------------
Frank DeRenzo
President/Director
KATHERINE ANNE SMITH

,

Appellant,

v.

WILLIAM G. SMITH, JR.

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 1 6

- 5 404

_____________________________/

Opinion filed May 17, 2017.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Leon County. Terry P. Lewis , Judge.

F. Wallace Pope, Jr., Brandon D. Bellew, and Eric J. Brooks of Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP, Clearwater ; Jackie L. Fulford of the Law Office of Jackie L. Fulford, P.A., Tallahassee , for Appellant

.

Kenneth R. Hart and Kevin A. Forsthoefel, Ausley McMullen, Tallahassee

, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BILBREY

, WINOKUR, and WINSOR, J J

., CONCUR.
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Notes: 1. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 83 FR 22178, May 14, 2018. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 83 FR 61310, Nov. 29, 2018 3. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 85 FR 65504, Oct. 15, 2020. 4. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 87 FR 44266, July 26, 2022.

Editorial Note on Subpart D of Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart D of part 2 appear at 60 FR 66713, Dec. 26, 1995.

§ 2.33 Inspector General. ( a ) The following delegations of authority are made by the Secretary of Agriculture to the Inspector General: ( 1 ) Advise the Secretary and General officers in the planning, development, and execution of Department policies and programs.
( 2 ) At the request of the Director, Homeland Security Staff (Director), determine the availability of law enforcement personnel of the Office of Inspector General to assist the Director in providing for the personal security for the Secretary and the Deputy Secretary.
( 3 ) Serve as liaison official for the Department for all audits of USDA performed by the General Accounting Office.
( 4 ) In addition to the above delegations of authority, the Inspector General, under the general supervision of the Secretary, has specific duties, responsibilities, and authorities pursuant to the Inspector General Act of 1978, Pub. L. No. 95-452, 5 U.S.C. App.
( b ) The following authority is reserved to the Secretary of Agriculture: Approving the implementation in the Office of Inspector General of administrative policies or procedures that contravene standard USDA administrative policies as promulgated by the Assistant Secretary for Administration.
[60 FR 56393, Nov. 8, 1995, as amended at 72 FR 36859, July 6, 2007]
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 16, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69938-69947]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28767]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal Nos. 10-44]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Defense Security Cooperation Agency, Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 
601-3740.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a copy of a letter to the 
Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittals 10-44 with 
attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of 
Technology.

    Dated: November 9, 2010.
Morgan F. Park,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P

[[Page 69939]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16NO10.016


[[Page 69940]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16NO10.017


[[Page 69941]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16NO10.018


[[Page 69942]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16NO10.019


[[Page 69943]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16NO10.020


[[Page 69944]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16NO10.021


[[Page 69945]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16NO10.022


[[Page 69946]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16NO10.023


[[Page 69947]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16NO10.024

[FR Doc. 2010-28767 Filed 11-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2053 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to apply budget neutrality 

on a State-specific basis in the calculation of the Medicare hospital 

wage index floor for non-rural areas. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 20, 2013 

Mr. BRADY of Texas (for himself, Mr. REED, Mr. TIBERI, Mr. ROSKAM, Mr. 

BUCHANAN, Mr. SCHOCK, Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania, Mr. RENACCI, 

and Mr. GRIFFITH of Virginia) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to apply 

budget neutrality on a State-specific basis in the calculation of the Medicare hospital wage index floor for nonrural areas. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2053 IH

1 SECTION 1. APPLYING BUDGET NEUTRALITY ON A STATE2 SPECIFIC BASIS IN THE CALCULATION OF 

3 THE MEDICARE HOSPITAL WAGE INDEX 

4 FLOOR FOR NON-RURAL AREAS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1886(d)(3)(E) of the So6 cial Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(3)(E)) is amend7 ed by adding at the end the following new clause: 

8 ‘‘(iv) APPLICATION OF BUDGET NEU9 TRALITY RELATING TO FLOOR ON WAGE

10 AREA INDEX IN NON-RURAL AREAS.— 

11 ‘‘(I) APPLICATION ON A STATE12 SPECIFIC BASIS BEGINNING IN FISCAL

13 YEAR 2014.—Subject to subclause (II), 

14 in the case of discharges occurring on 

15 or after October 1, 2013, for purposes 

16 of applying section 4410(b) of the 

17 Balanced Budget Act of 1997, the 

18 Secretary shall administer such sec19 tion 4410(b) and paragraph (e) of 

20 section 412.64 of title 42, Code of 

21 Federal Regulations, as if paragraph 

22 (e)(4)(ii) of such section 412.64 had 

23 never applied and by using the meth24 odology promulgated in the Federal 

25 Register on August 19, 2008 (73 Fed. 

26 Reg. 48570) (applied as if such methVerDate Mar 15 2010 19:35 May 24, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2053.IH H2053

tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2053 IH

1 odology had been fully implemented 

2 for fiscal year 2011 using a 100 per3 cent State-specific adjustment to the 

4 area wage index). 

5 ‘‘(II) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing 

6 in subclause (I) shall be construed as 

7 preventing the Secretary, for dis8 charges occurring on or after October 

9 1, 2014, from modifying the regula10 tions under such section 412.64 in 

11 carrying out the budget neutrality re12 quirements of such section 4410(b).’’. 

13 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT TERMINATING APPLI14 CATION OF BUDGET NEUTRALITY ON A NATIONWIDE

15 BASIS.—Section 3141 of the Patient Protection and Af16 fordable Care Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww note) is amended 

17 by inserting ‘‘and before October 1, 2013,’’ after ‘‘2010,’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS