alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     Financial Data Schedule for NHP Retirement Housing Partners I, L.P.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000793730
<NAME>                        NHP Retirement Housing Partners I, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>               JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                 DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>              1.00
<CASH>                       5,821,300
<SECURITIES>                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                12,451
<ALLOWANCES>                 0
<INVENTORY>                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>             0
<PP&E>                       24,633,129
<DEPRECIATION>               (5,783,775)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               25,262,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>        0
<BONDS>                      20,157,826
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>        0
<PREFERRED>                  0
<COMMON>                     0
<OTHER-SE>                   (8,671,706)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 25,262,800
<SALES>                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>             22,995,262
<CGS>                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                10,344,067
<OTHER-EXPENSES>             1,122,455
<LOSS-PROVISION>             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>           8,119,171
<INCOME-PRETAX>              3,409,569
<INCOME-TAX>                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>          0
<DISCONTINUED>               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>              0
<CHANGES>                    0
<NET-INCOME>                 3,409,569
<EPS-PRIMARY>                0
<EPS-DILUTED>                0
        



</TABLE>
#### § 29.2537 Offtype.

Tobacco of distinctly different characteristics which cannot be classified as Fire-cured, U.S. Types 22, 23, or Foreign Type 96. (See Rule 22, § 29.2638.)

[37 FR 13626, July 12, 1972. Redesignated and amended at 49 FR 16757, Apr. 20, 1984]
118 STAT. 1214 PUBLIC LAW 108–321—OCT. 5, 2004

Public Law 108–321

108th Congress

An Act

To expand the Timucuan Ecological and Historic Preserve, Florida.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Timucuan Ecological and Historic

Preserve Boundary Revision Act of 2004’’.

SEC. 2. REVISION OF BOUNDARY OF TIMUCUAN ECOLOGICAL AND HISTORIC PRESERVE, FLORIDA.

Section 201(a) of Public Law 100–249 (16 U.S.C. 698n) is

amended—

(1) by striking ‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—There is hereby’’ and

inserting the following:

‘‘(a) ESTABLISHMENT.—

‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—There is’’; and

(2) by adding at the end the following:

‘‘(2) MODIFICATION OF BOUNDARY.—

‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In addition to the land described

in paragraph (1), the Preserve shall include approximately

8.5 acres of land located in Nassau County, Florida, as

generally depicted on the map entitled ‘Timucuan

Ecological and Historic Preserve American Beach Adjustment’, numbered 006/80012 and dated June 2003.

‘‘(B) DUTIES OF SECRETARY.—The Secretary of the

Interior shall—

‘‘(i) revise the boundaries of the Preserve so as

to encompass the land described in subparagraph (A);

and

16 USC 698n

note.

Timucuan

Ecological and

Historic Preserve

Boundary

Revision Act of

2004.

Oct. 5, 2004

[H.R. 3768]

PUBLIC LAW 108–321—OCT. 5, 2004 118 STAT. 1215

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 3768:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 108–493 (Comm. on Resources).

SENATE REPORTS: No. 108–333 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):

May 17, considered and passed House.

Sept. 15, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

‘‘(ii) maintain the map described in subparagraph

(A) on file and available for public inspection in the

appropriate offices of the National Park Service.’’.

Approved October 5, 2004.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001014669
<NAME> STERLING CHEMICALS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             MAY-14-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           5,581
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  135,635
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     53,720
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               211,226
<PP&E>                                         593,305
<DEPRECIATION>                               (227,540)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 685,451
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          133,927
<BONDS>                                        619,875
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (184,302)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   685,451
<SALES>                                         83,410
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                83,410
<CGS>                                           83,047
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   83,047
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,426
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (3,621)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    558
<INCOME-TAX>                                       384
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                174
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       174
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 1740.62 Evaluation of Awardee operations. ( a ) RUS may send a team to the awardee's facilities to complete a Management Analysis Profile (MAP) of the entire operation. MAPs are used by RUS as a means of evaluating an Awardee's strengths and weaknesses and ensuring that awardees are prepared to fulfil the terms of the award. Once an applicant accepts an award offer, RUS may schedule a site visit as soon as possible.
( b ) RUS reserves the right not to advance funds until the MAP has been completed. If the MAP identifies issues that can affect the operation and completion of the project, those issues must be addressed to the satisfaction of RUS before funds can be advanced. Funding may be rescinded if following a MAP, the agency determines that the awardee will be unable to meet the requirements of the award.
#### § 1774.19 Applications determined ineligible.

If at any time an application is determined ineligible, the processing office will notify the applicant in writing of the reasons. The notification to the applicant will state that an appeal of this decision may be made by the applicant under 7 CFR part 11.
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3: 95cr3005LAC

CARLOS MOSQUEDA

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on APRIL 22, 2008 

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION FOR MODIFICATION AND/OR RECALCULATION OF 

SENTENCE PURSUANT TO TITLE 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) , AMENDMENT 711 

Filed by DEFENDANT PRO SE on4/21/08 Doc.# 292

RESPONSES:

on Doc.#

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Mary Maloy

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 29th day of

April, 2008, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) See Document 291. 

 s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 3:95-cr-03005-LC-EMT Document 293 Filed 04/29/08 Page 1 of 1
From: "Whiteman, Chad" <Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov>

To: Venu Ghanta/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 01/25/2013 06:45 PM

Subject: RE: 1/23 EPA Response pertaining to 2013 RFS Volume Standards [RIN 2060-AR43]

Attached is a suggested sentence, highlighted in green, that would at the least let UCS know that we 

have heard their concerns. It also echoes what USDA and some of the other stakeholders have stated in 

EO meetings. This would be inserted in the first paragraph on page 44. Feel free to give me a call on 

my BB if you want to discuss. 

Nevertheless, we recognize that some uncertainty exists in the projected availability of other 

advanced biofuels. The single largest source, Brazilian sugarcane ethanol, was exported at lower 

total volumes in 2010 - 2012 than the U.S. would need in 2013 to meet the 2.75 bill gal advanced 

biofuel requirement. Moreover, the need for 666 mill gal of Brazilian sugar ethanol in 2013 

exceeds all historical volumes of ethanol imported into the U.S. from Brazil by a substantial 

margin. In addition, EPA is aware of concerns by some stakeholders that sugar ethanol imported 

by the US may be replaced in the exporting country’s domestic market by either non-advanced 

biofuels, or by petroleum, which could frustrate the purpose of the RFS program to generate a 

net increase in the production and use of advanced biofuels. There may be enough uncertainty to 

warrant a more cautious approach to advanced biofuel and total renewable fuel in 2013, for 

example a reduction of 200 mill gal to approximate the uncertainty discussed above. Therefore, 

while we are not proposing to reduce the required volumes of advanced biofuel and total 

renewable fuel for 2013, we request comment on whether and to what extent a reduction is 

warranted; we have the discretion to reduce the advanced biofuel volume requirement for 2013 

by up to the amount that the cellulosic biofuel volume requirement is reduced (986 mill gal in 

today's proposal). Were we to do so, as discussed in Section III.A, we would also 

simultaneously reduce the total renewable fuel requirement by the same amount.

From: Ghanta.Venu@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Ghanta.Venu@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 5:21 PM

To: Whiteman, Chad; Korotney.David@epamail.epa.gov; Farber.Glenn@epamail.epa.gov; 

Simon.Karl@epamail.epa.gov; Stewart.Lori@epamail.epa.gov; Jutras.Nathaniel@epamail.epa.gov; 

Argyropoulos.Paul@epamail.epa.gov; hannon.john@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: Re: 1/23 EPA Response pertaining to 2013 RFS Volume Standards [RIN 2060-AR43]

Hi ChadPlease find the redline of what we intend to be our final passback attached. I have added in the changes 

on pp. 11, 24, 43, and 50 that we discussed this morning. We also made some minor edits in light of 

today's DC Circuit decision.

Please contact me if you need anything else.

(See attached file: EO12866_RFS standards 2060-AR43 NPRM FRN_20130125.docx)

Venu Ghanta

Office of Transportation and Air Quality
US Environmental Protection Agency

202-564-1374 (phone)
Exhibit
23.1

CONSENT OF
INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form
S-8 Nos. 33-43290, 33-65380, 33-65382, 33-80433 and 333-53602) pertaining to the
Health Management Associates, Inc. Retirement Savings Plan and various employee
and directors stock option plans of Health Management Associates, Inc. and
Registration Statements (Form S-3 Nos. 333-86034, 333-102686 and 333-109756) of
Health Management Associates, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses of our report
dated October 21, 2003, except for Note 12, as to which the date is November 1,
2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
Health Management Associates, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended September 30, 2003.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG
LLP

Tampa, FloridaDecember
 18, 2003

69
#### § 29.2526 Group.

A division of a type covering closely related grades based on certain characteristics which are usually related to stalk position, body, or the general quality of the tobacco. Groups in these types are Wrappers (A), Heavy Leaf (B), Thin Leaf (C), Lugs (X), Nondescript (N), and Scrap (S).
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA DIVISION

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

vs. CASE NO.1:03CR58-MMP/AK

JASON DWAYNE ASHFORD,

Defendant.

 /

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This cause is before the Court on Defendant’s motion to vacate, set aside, or

correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Doc. 27. Defendant pled guilty to

possession of a firearm by a prior convicted felon on December 10, 2003. Doc. 16. He

was sentenced on March 16, 2004, to a term of 220-months imprisonment. Doc. 23. 

He did not appeal the sentence.

On this occasion, Defendant maintains that he has been subjected to an

unconstitutionally enhanced sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines in contravention

of Booker. Doc. 27.

Following its decision in Blakely v. Washington, which involved the

constitutionality of state sentencing guidelines, the United States Supreme Court

Case 1:03-cr-00058-MP-AK Document 28 Filed 03/16/05 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No.1:03cr58-mmp/ak

determined that Blakely applies to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines as well. United

States v. Booker, ____ U.S. ____, 124 S.Ct. 2519, 159 L.Ed. 2d 442 (2204). However,

the Eleventh Circuit has just determined that Booker is not retroactively applicable to

cases on collateral review, as “Booker’s constitutional rule falls squarely under the

category of new rules of criminal procedure that do not apply retroactively to § 2255

cases on collateral review.” Varela v. United States, 2005 WL 367095, at *4 (11th Cir.

Feb. 17, 2005).

In light of the foregoing, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED:

That Defendant’s motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2255, Doc. 27, be DENIED.

IN CHAMBERS at Gainesville, Florida, this 16th day of March, 2005.

s/ A. KORNBLUM 

ALLAN KORNBLUM

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO THE PARTIES

A party may file specific, written objections to the proposed findings and

recommendations within 15 days after being served with a copy of this report and

recommendation. A party may respond to another party’s objections within 10 days after

being served with a copy thereof. Failure to file specific objections limits the scope of

review of proposed factual findings and recommendations.

Case 1:03-cr-00058-MP-AK Document 28 Filed 03/16/05 Page 2 of 2
yearID roadTypeID rampFraction

2013 2 0.075008591

2013 4 0.117027776
EXHIBIT 23-1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
The Navigators Group, Inc.

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements No. 33-51608, No. 333-97183, No. 333-106317 and
333-125124 on Form S-8 of The Navigators Group, Inc. and subsidiaries, our report dated February 23, 2006, with respect to the consolidated
balance sheets of The Navigators Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity, comprehensive
income and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005, and all related financial statements schedules, management's assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, which
reports appear in the December 31, 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Navigators Group, Inc. and subsidiaries.



New
York, New York
February 23, 2006

---
exv10w16



 






Exhibit 10.16




Named Executive Officer Compensation




     The Compensation and Personnel Committee of the Board of Directors of SLM Corporation (the
“Compensation Committee”), in consultation with the Board of Directors, set 2005 base salaries for
the Corporation’s Named Executive Officers for 2004 (“NEOs”) and established the 2005 annual bonus
plan as described below.



2005 Base Salaries




	 	 	 	 
	 
	NEO	2005 Base Salaries	 
	 
	Albert L. Lord, Chief Executive Officer and Vice Chairman
	$	750,000	 
	Thomas J. Fitzpatrick, President and Chief Operating Officer
	$	600,000	 
	Marianne M. Keler, Executive Vice President
	$	450,000	 
	John. F. Remondi, Executive Vice President, Corporate Finance
	$	325,000	 
	June M. McCormack, Executive Vice President, Guarantor Servicing and
Sales
	$	325,000	 
	John F. Whorley, Executive Vice President, Debt Management Operations
	$	325,000	 
	 






2005 Annual Bonus Plan




     The Compensation Committee established the performance bonus plan for 2005 (the “2005 Bonus
Plan”) under the shareholder-approved SLM Corporation Incentive Plan. NEOs and other members of
executive management are eligible for the plan. The maximum award that may be earned by any
individual is the lesser of $5 million, an amount set forth in the SLM Corporation Incentive Plan,
and 1 percent of the Corporation’s “core cash” net income for the year, however, the maximum bonus
amount set for the Chief Executive Officer is 4 times his base salary. The maximum bonus amount
for other executive officers ranges from 3.5 to 2.5 of their base salaries. The Compensation
Committee will use its discretion to make actual awards based on a common set of corporate goals
and a personalized set of individual performance assessments. Overall assessments are more
weighted towards individual performance than corporate performance.



     Corporate performance goals were set by the Compensation Committee after consideration of the
2005 business plan. The goals are directly related to key components of the 2005 business plan,
but are set at a higher level. Thus, in order to achieve the corporate performance goals of the
2005 Bonus Plan, the 2005 business plan goals need to be exceeded. Five separate performance goals
were set and weighted to reflect their importance. These corporate measures and their relative
weighting in the overall performance score are as follows:



	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	Corporate Goals	 	 	Weighting	 
	 
	“Core cash” earnings per share growth
	 	 	25	%
	Preferred channel loan origination volume growth
	 	 	20	%
	Fee income growth
	 	 	20	%
	Operating expense control
	 	 	20	%
	Cost of funds for new debt issuances
	 	 	15	%
	 






     Individual performance goals vary by position and include goals set within various business
units.


     At least 40 percent of each executive officer’s annual bonus will be awarded in the form of
SLM common stock.
#### § 201.32 Screenings.

Screenings shipped in interstate commerce, if in containers, shall be labeled in a legible manner with letters not smaller than 18 point type and, if in bulk, shall be invoiced with the words, “Screenings for processing—not for seeding.”

[5 FR 31, Jan. 4, 1940]
SUMMARY OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION



 Exhibit 10.38 
  
 Summary of Executive Compensation 
  
 Salaries: 
  
 The named executive officers of IDX Systems Corporation (the “Company”), as defined in Item 402 of Regulation S-K (each, a “Named
Executive”), are paid the following in annual salary: 
  

			
	 James H. Crook
	  	$518,301
	 Thomas W. Butts
	  	$353,261
	 John A. Kane
	  	$279,883
	 Robert F. Galin
	  	$241,749
	 Walt Marti
	  	$196,250

  
 Bonuses: 
  
 Each Named Executive will be eligible for a bonus in respect of fiscal year
2005 based on the actual earnings per share of the Company as compared to a targeted earnings per share of the Company. The percentage of the Named Executive’s targeted bonus for which he or she will be eligible is determined on a sliding
scale, such that for every percentage point by which the actual earnings per share differs from the targeted earnings per share, the percentage of target bonus decreases or increases by 7% (however, if the actual earnings per share is less than 90%
of the targeted earnings per share, the Named Executive is not eligible for any bonus, and the Named Executive is also not eligible for amounts in excess of 170% of his or her targeted bonus. 
  
 For Named Executives responsible for one of the Company’s four operating
units, the bonus is determined based 50% on the formula described above and 50% on the attainment of specified revenue, DSO and cumulative quarterly profitability goals. 
  
 Other: 
  
 Each Named Executive may also be granted from time to time stock options, restricted stock or other awards pursuant to the Company’s stock incentive
plans. 
  
 The foregoing description, in the case of Messrs. Crook
and Butts, is subject to their employment, non-competition and non-disclosure agreements, which have been filed as exhibits to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. The foregoing description is also subject to executive retention
agreements, a form of which has been filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.
#### § 29.2527 Injury.

Hurt or impairment from any cause except the fungous or bacterial diseases which attack tobacco in its cured state. (See Rule 15, § 29.2631.)
Exhibit 32.1

PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the quarterly report of Eagle Bulk Shipping Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘‘SEC’’) on or about the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Sophocles Zoullas, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|  |           |                                                                                                                       |
|--|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (1)  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|  |           |                                                                                                                                                      |
|--|-----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  | (2)  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

Date: August 8, 2007

/s/ Sophocles Zoullas                    Sophocles ZoullasChief Executive Officer

----
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of China Natural Resources, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Li Feilie, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Li Feilie

Li Feilie

Chief Executive Officer

May 26, 2010

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.