alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6377

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BRUCE GREGORY HARRISON, III,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at 

Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, Chief District Judge. (1:10-cr-00411-TDS-1)

Submitted: November 18, 2021 Decided: December 13, 2021

Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bruce Gregory Harrison, III, Appellant Pro Se. Gregory Victor Davis, UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Bruce Gregory Harrison, III, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his 

motion for compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as amended by 

the First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, § 603(b)(1), 132 Stat. 5194, 5239. The 

Government argues that Harrison’s appeal is untimely and, therefore, must be dismissed. 

In criminal cases, the defendant must file his notice of appeal within 14 days after 

the entry of judgment. Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A)(i); see United States v. Goodwyn, 

596 F.3d 233, 235 n.* (4th Cir. 2010) (“[Section] 3582 motions . . . are criminal in 

nature.”). With or without a motion, upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause,

the district court may grant an extension of up to 30 days to file a notice of appeal. Fed. 

R. App. P. 4(b)(4); see United States v. Oliver, 878 F.3d 120, 123 (4th Cir. 2017).

The district court entered the order denying Harrison’s motion for compassionate 

release on February 22, 2021. Harrison filed his notice of appeal on March 9, 2021, one 

day after the expiration of the appeal period.

1

 Because Harrison failed to file a timely 

notice of appeal or to obtain an extension of the appeal period and the Government 

promptly invoked the time-bar, we dismiss his appeal as untimely.2

 See 4th Cir. R. 

27(f)(2).

1 For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the postmark 

is the earliest date Harrison could have delivered the notice to prison officials for mailing 

to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1)(A)(ii); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988).

2 We previously remanded this case to the district court for a determination of 

whether Harrison had shown excusable neglect or good cause warranting an extension of 

the appeal period. The district court determined that Harrison failed to establish excusable 
3

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED

neglect or good cause for the late filing of his notice of appeal, and we conclude that the 

district court did not abuse its discretion in so finding. See United States v. Breit, 754 F.2d 

526, 528-29 (4th Cir. 1985) (stating standard).
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                                 216
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       216
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         216
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                5,500
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            21,691
<OTHER-SE>                                         261,996
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           216
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        5,127
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (5,127)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (5,127)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.03)
                                                 

</TABLE>
98-1459.

#### State ex rel. Gregory v. Money.

In Mandamus. *Sua sponte,*cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
###### Editorial Note on Part 226

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 226 appear at 70 FR 43261, July 27, 2005.

#### § 226.26 Program information.

Persons seeking information about this Program should contact their State administering agency or the appropriate FNSRO. The FNS website has contact information for State agencies at *https://www.fns.usda.gov/fns-contacts* and FNSROs at *https://www.fns.usda.gov/fns-regional-offices.*

[88 FR 57858, Aug. 23, 2023]
March 29, 1996


          Securities and Exchange Commission
          450 5th Street N.W.
          Judiciary Plaza
          Washington, D.C.  20549

          Re:  NHP Retirement Housing Partners I Limited Partnership
               SEC File Number:  0-16815

          Madam or Sir:

          Enclosed  please find Form 10-K  for the year  ended December 31,
          1995 for the above referenced partnership.

          Please  acknowledge  receipt  of  this  filing  by  stamping  and
          returning the enclosed copy of this letter in the self-addressed,
          stamped envelope provided.  If there are any questions  regarding
          this filing, please contact the undersigned.

          Very truly yours,

          NHP RETIREMENT HOUSING PARTNERS I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP



          Pamela Crace
          Investor Relations Director

          PJC/pb

          Enclosure 
<PAGE>
629 S.E.2d 367

#### In the Matter of William J. LaLIMA, Respondent.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

April 21, 2006.

ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel has filed a petition asking this Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant *501to Rule 17, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, and seeking the appointment of an attorney to protect respondent’s clients’ interests pursuant to Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR.

IT IS ORDERED that respondent’s license to practice law in this state is suspended until further order of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Robert H. Mozingo, Esquire, is hereby appointed to assume responsibility for respondent’s client files, trust account(s), escrow account(s), operating account(s), and any other law office account(s) respondent may maintain. Mr. Mozingo shall take action as required by Rule 31, RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, to protect the interests of respondent’s clients. Mr. Mozingo may make disbursements from respondent’s trust account(s), escrow accounts), operating aecount(s), and any other law office accounts) respondent may maintain that are necessary to effectuate this appointment.

This Order, when served on any bank or other financial institution maintaining trust, escrow and/or operating accounts of respondent, shall serve as an injunction to prevent respondent from making withdrawals from the account(s) and shall further serve as notice to the bank or other financial institution that Robert H. Mozingo, Esquire, has been duly appointed by this Court.

Finally, this Order, when served on any office of the United States Postal Service, shall serve as notice that Robert H. Mozingo, Esquire, has been duly appointed by this Court and has the authority to receive respondent’s mail and the authority to direct that respondent’s mail be delivered to Mr. Mozingo’s office.

This appointment shall be for a period of no longer than nine months unless request is made to this Court for an extension.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Jean H. Toal, C.J.

FOR THE COURT
Kevin Schlemmer EAS and Domestic Analysis Division U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, SE Washington, D.C. 20590
Dear Mr. Schlemmer: 677 AlaMoana Blvd., Suite 1016 Honolulu, Hawai'i 96816 Thursday, 12 March 2014

I wholeheartedly support Makani Kai Air Charter's bidto continue providing scheduled air service to Kalaupapa onthe island ofMoloka'i. I am the physician who regularly travels to Kalaupapa to serve mypatients there. Makani 

### Kai Air Charters has flown me to Moloka'i for years now, first ontheir charters, and for the past 2 years ontheir scheduled flights, and I have found their service to be excellent and reliable. During theten years I have served the patients there as faculty ofthe University of Hawai'i School ofMedicine, I have flown to Kalaupapa with several other companies, and 

### in my opinion Makani Kai Air Charters is the best offering service to that destination. The pilots are professionals and the aircraft are maintained in fine condition. Richard Schuman, the ownerofMakani Kai, is dedicated to excellent customer service, and that philosophy is evident inthe company's daily operations. This fme company should receive your every considerationfor providing essential air service to Kalaupapa.
Thank you for your time and attention!

# s~c**re~u'&z_ad**

. Kalani Brady, MD, MPH, F

# 1J

Associate Professor, Department ofNativeHawaiian Health Department ofMedicine University ofHawai'i John A. Bums School ofMedicine
**EXHIBIT 32.1** **CERTIFICATION    OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Commercial    Lines Inc. (the “Company”) on    Form 10-Q    for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the    Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the    “Report”), I, Michael P. Ryan, Chief Executive    Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.    § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    result of operations of the Company. /s/  Michael    P. Ryan    Michael P. Ryan,
98-1652.

#### State ex rel. Howard v. Court of Appeals, Eighth Appellate Dist.

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1849 

To amend the Hobby Protection Act to make unlawful the provision of 

assistance or support in violation of that Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 7, 2013 

Mr. SMITH of Texas (for himself, Mr. SCALISE, Mr. CASSIDY, and Mr. WAXMAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Hobby Protection Act to make unlawful the 

provision of assistance or support in violation of that 

Act, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Collectible Coin Pro5 tection Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROVISION OF ASSISTANCE OR SUPPORT. 

7 The Hobby Protection Act (15 U.S.C. 2101 et seq.) 

8 is amended— 

9 (1) in section 2— 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1849 IH

1 (A) in subsection (b), by inserting ‘‘, or the 

2 sale in commerce’’ after ‘‘distribution in com3 merce’’; 

4 (B) by redesignating subsection (d) as sub5 section (e) and inserting after subsection (c) the 

6 following: 

7 ‘‘(d) PROVISION OF ASSISTANCE OR SUPPORT.—It 

8 shall be a violation of subsection (a) or (b) for a person 

9 to provide substantial assistance or support to any manu10 facturer, importer, or seller if that person knows or con11 sciously avoids knowing that the manufacturer, importer, 

12 or seller is engaged in any act or practice that violates 

13 subsection (a) or (b).’’; and 

14 (C) in subsection (e) (as so redesignated), 

15 by striking ‘‘and (b)’’ and inserting ‘‘(b), and 

16 (d)’’; 

17 (2) in section 3— 

18 (A) by striking ‘‘If any person’’ and insert19 ing ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—If any person’’; 

20 (B) by striking ‘‘or has an agent’’ and in21 serting ‘‘, has an agent, transacts business, or 

22 wherever venue is proper under section 1391 of 

23 title 28, United States Code’’; and 

24 (C) by adding at the end the following: 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1849 IH

1 ‘‘(b) TRADEMARK VIOLATIONS.—If the violation of 

2 section 2 (a) or (b) or a rule under section 2(c) also in3 volves unauthorized use of registered trademarks belong4 ing to a collectibles certification service, the owner of such 

5 trademarks shall have, in addition to the remedies pro6 vided in subsection (a), all rights provided under sections 

7 34, 35, and 36 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (15 U.S.C. 

8 1116, 1117, and 1118) for violations of such Act.’’; and 

9 (3) in section 7, by adding at the end the fol10 lowing: 

11 ‘‘(8) The term ‘collectibles certification service’ 

12 means a person recognized by collectors for pro13 viding independent certification that collectible items 

14 are genuine.’’. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Case No. DA 20 - 0279 DANA ROLAN, on her own behalf and on behalf of the class she represents,

Plaintiffs/A

ppellees, vs. NEW WEST HEALTH SERVICES, DARWIN SELECT INSURANCE COMPANY and ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY and DARWIN NATIONAL ASSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant s /Appellant s . **GRANT OF**  **EXTENSION**

Pursuant to M. R. App. P. 26(1) and upon Uncontested Motion of Appellees for an extension of time to file the ir r esponse b rief, and there being no objection from Appellants , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellees are granted a thirty
- day extension, up to and including October 23, 2020, within which to file the ir response b rief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court September 18 2020

09/18/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0279
----

----

|   | (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                                                                        |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented in this report. |

|   /s   YongboWang |                          |
|---------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
|                                  | Yongbo (Esther) Wang          |   |
|                                  | Chief Financial Officer  |   |

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCTS LIABILITY 

LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

Lloyd Baker

Civil Case No. 7:20-cv-00039

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 3:19-md-02885

Judge M. Casey Rodgers

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones

NOTICE OF FILING 

On June 18, 2021, the Court announced an oral ruling from the bench in 

connection with the document attached hereto as Exhibit A, which the Court made 

a part of the record (ECF No. 180). The Court later issued a written Order relating 

to the subject matter of its June 18, 2021 oral ruling. (ECF No. 187.) To provide 

context for the use of Exhibit A in Defendants’ closing argument and for the 

limited purpose of contesting the oral ruling and the written order, the documents 

attached as Exhibit B, which include additional demonstrative slides used by 

Defendants’ counsel in closing before and after the use of the slide shown in 

Exhibit A, are hereby filed to be made part of the record in this case.

Case 7:20-cv-00039-MCR-GRJ Document 189 Filed 07/07/21 Page 1 of 3
2

Respectfully submitted:

/s/ Larry Hill

Larry Hill

Florida Bar No. 173908

lhill@mhw-law.com

Charles F. Beall, Jr. 

Florida Bar No. 66494

cbeall@mhw-law.com

Haley J. VanFleteren

Florida Bar No. 1003674

hvanfleteren@mhw-law.com

MOORE, HILL & WESTMORELAND, P.A.

350 West Cedar Street

Maritime Place, Suite 100

Pensacola FL 32502

Telephone: (850) 434-3541

Counsel for Kimberly O. Branscome 

and Jay L. Bhimani 

Case 7:20-cv-00039-MCR-GRJ Document 189 Filed 07/07/21 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on July 7, 2021, I caused a copy of the foregoing to be 

filed through the Court’s CM/ECF system, which will serve all counsel of record.

/s/ Larry Hill

Larry Hill

Case 7:20-cv-00039-MCR-GRJ Document 189 Filed 07/07/21 Page 3 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENSACOLA DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

ex rel. ROBERT V. SMITH, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. Case No. 3:20cv3678/MCR/EMT

JAY A. ODOM; OKALOOSA COUNTY, 

BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, 

 Defendants. 

______________________________________/ 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE AND DESIGNATION OF EMAIL ADDRESSES 

To: The Clerk of Court and all parties of record 

I am admitted or otherwise authorized to practice in this court, and I appear in this case as 

counsel for Defendant, Jay A. Odom. My email designations are as follows: 

Primary: bgordon@anchorsgordon.com 

Secondary: cyndi@anchorsgordon.com 

 It is requested that the Court and counsel of record serve all pleadings and other papers on 

behalf of Defendant, JAY A. ODOM, through the undersigned counsel. 

 Dated this 11th day of January, 2021. 

 /s/ A. Benjamin Gordon, III

 A. Benjamin Gordon, III 

Florida Bar No. 528617 

 AnchorsGordon, P.A. 

 2113 Lewis Turner Blvd., Suite 100 

 Fort Walton Beach, Florida 32547 

 Phone: (850) 863-1974 

 Fax: (850) 863-1591 

Case 3:20-cv-03678-MCR-EMT Document 17 Filed 01/11/21 Page 1 of 2
 Email: bgordon@anchorsgordon.com 

 cyndi@anchorsgordon.com 

Case 3:20-cv-03678-MCR-EMT Document 17 Filed 01/11/21 Page 2 of 2
#### In re Estate of Lewellyn Snyder, deceased, on appeal of Cora Ward Gregory et al., appellants, v. Helen Norris, administratrix de bonis non of the estate of Lewellyn Snyder, deceased, and Grace Snyder, appellees.

Gen. No. 37,370.

Opinion filed November 27, 1934.

W. C. Smith, for appellants. Lee Cohn and Alice Greenacre, for appellees.

Mr. Justice Sullivan

delivered the opinion of the court.
§ 1230.630 List of registered voters. ( a ) *Producers.* The In-Person Voter Registration List (Form LS-75) and the Absentee Voter Request List (Form LS-74) will be available for inspection during the 3 days of the voting period and during the 7 business days following the date of the last day of the voting period at the county FSA office. The lists will be posted during regular office hours in a conspicuous public location at the FSA county office. The Absentee and In-Person Voter Registration Lists will be updated and posted daily. The complete In-Person Voter Request List (Form LS-75) will be posted in the FSA county office on the 1st business day after the date of the last day of the voting period. The complete Absentee Voter Request List (Form LS-74) will be posted in the FSA county office on the 6th business day after the date of the last day of the voting period.
( b ) *Importers.* The Importer Ballot Request List (Form LS-77) will be maintained by the FSA headquarters office in Washington, DC, and not posted.
##### AVAILABLE ONLY ON THE WORLD WIDE WEB

## U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 1147

> A Predictive Production Rate Life-Cycle Model
> for Southwestern Virginia Coalfields

by
Robert C. Milici

U.S. Geological Survey

Reston, VA 20192
andElisabeth V. M. Campbell

Virginia Division of Mineral Resources

Charlottesville, VA 22902
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2103 

To direct the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency 

to designate New Jersey Task Force 1 as part of the National Urban 

Search and Rescue System. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 22, 2013 

Mr. FRELINGHUYSEN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To direct the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to designate New Jersey Task Force 

1 as part of the National Urban Search and Rescue 

System. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ADDITION OF TEAM TO NATIONAL URBAN 

4 SEARCH AND RESCUE SYSTEM. 

5 (a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 

6 (1) The terrorist attacks of September 11, 

7 2001, demonstrated the importance of enhancing na8 tional domestic terrorism preparedness. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2103 IH

1 (2) Twenty-six of the 28 urban search and res2 cue teams included in the National Urban Search 

3 and Rescue System of the Federal Emergency Man4 agement Agency were called into action in the wake 

5 of the events of September 11th. 

6 (3) Highly qualified, urban search and rescue 

7 teams not included in the National Urban Search 

8 and Rescue System were the first teams in New 

9 York City on September 11th. 

10 (4) The continuing threat of a possible domestic 

11 terrorist attack remains an important mission for 

12 which the Nation must prepare to respond. 

13 (5) Part of that response should be to increase 

14 the number of urban search and rescue teams in15 cluded in the National Urban Search and Rescue 

16 System. 

17 (b) ADDITION OF NEW JERSEY TASK FORCE 1.— 

18 The Administrator of the Federal Emergency Manage19 ment Agency shall designate New Jersey Task Force 1 

20 as part of the National Urban Search and Rescue System. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
(April 25, 1967)

#### In the Matter of Boss-Linco Lines, Inc., Petitioner, v. State Tax Commission, Respondent.

Memorandum by the Court. Proceeding under section 199 of the Tax Law and article 78 of the CPLR to review a determination of the State Tax Commission which sustained a corporation franchise tax assessment purportedly imposed pursuant to section 183 of the Tax Law. To the extent that the issuance of new shares followed the transfer from surplus to capital of $97,100 (net), we find no basis for differentiating the determination of franchise tax liability at which the Tax Commission arrived from that which we sustained in *Matter of Garvey Carting & Stor.*v. *State Tax Comm.*(27 A D 2d 337). Determination confirmed, with costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Staley, Jr., and Gabrielli, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court.