alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 22.307 Program evaluation. The Department of Agriculture is responsible for continuous program evaluation to determine if individual projects and the entire program is cost effective in terms of reaching rural development goals. As a result, USDA is responsible for conducting and reporting an annual evaluation of selected rural development projects and the overall rural development program. USDA shall include as a part of its evaluation Federal Regional Council assessment of the effectiveness of interagency coordination and delivery of services within the overall rural development program. States and multicounty districts are encouraged to participate in the joint preparation of such program evaluations. Copies of such evaluations should be supplied to the Administrator, Rural Development Service, Department of Agriculture and to the Federal Regional Councils, in sufficient time so as to arrive not later than July 1. The initial evaluation, due July 1, 1974, in addition to the requirements listed below, should include a background statement and should summarize first year program efforts and results. Annual evaluation should: ( a ) Describe the process used in planning, project selection and priority setting, and the criteria and process used in evaluating program effectiveness.
( b ) Describe the specific objectives of the programs.
( c ) Describe and assess the cost and effectiveness of projects being pursued within individual multicounty jurisdictions.
( d ) Express observations, conclusions and recommendations based on such evaluations which may contribute to the development of better management, coordination and planning procedures.
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 14-2182

CARDIGAN MOUNTAIN SCHOOL,

Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.

NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant, Appellee.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court, issued on May 27, 2015, is amended

as follows:

On page 13, line 9, replace "44))" with "44)".
EX-3.9
     CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

                     Certificate of Amendment to
                      Articles of Incorporation
                    For Nevada Profit Corporation
    (Pursuant to NRS 78.385 and 78.390 - After Issuance of Stock)


1.  Name of corporation: Synthetic Turf Corporation of America

2.  The articles have been amended as follows (provide article
numbers, if available):

13.  Effective December 14, 2004, (the "Effective Date"), all of the
issued and outstanding common shares, par value $0.001, of the
Corporation, being 215,808,038 in number, and all of its issued and
outstanding preferred shares, par value $0.001 per share, of the
Corporation, being 10,125,934 in number, are reclassified and combined
into a lesser number of common shares, par value $0.001, at a rate of
100 to 1, such that each one hundred (100) such issued and outstanding
common and preferred shares shall become one (1) shares of
reclassified common and preferred stock, par value $0.001.  No
fractional shares of common stock shall be issued by the Corporation
as the result of such reclassification; rather, the reclassified
shares of a stockholder of the Corporation shall be rounded up to the
nearest whole number of such reclassified shares, and any deficit
resulting from such rounding shall be assessed to the treasury of the
Corporation on the Effective Date.  The total number of shares of
stock which the Corporation shall be aurthorized to issue shall remain
Two Hundred Thirty-Five Million shares of Common Stock, par value
$0.001 per share, and Fifteen Million shares of Preferred Stock, par
value $0.001.  (This amendment is filed pursuant to approval of a
majority of the shareholders of the Corporation).

3.  The vote by which the stockholders holding shares in the
corporation entitling them to exercise at least a majority of the
voting power, or such greater proportion of the voting power as may be
required in the case of a vote by classes or series, or as may be
required by the provisions of the articles of incorporation have voted
in favor of the amendment is: 53.98%*

4.  Effective date of filing (optional):
_______________________________
(must not be later than 90 days after the
certificate is filed)

5.  Officer Signature (required): /s/  Gary Borglund
                                 Gary Borglund, President


*If any proposed amendment would alter or change any preference or any
relative or other right given to any class or series of outstanding
shares, then the amendment must be approved by the vote, in addition
to the affirmative vote otherwise required, of the holders of shares
representing a majority of the voting power of each class or series
affected by the amendment regardless of limitations or restrictions on
the voting power thereof.

IMPORTANT: Failure to include any of the above information and submit
the proper fees may cause this filing to be rejected.
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PUSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents in all material respect the financial condition and results of operations of Vitro Diagnostics, Inc.   Date:  March 16, 2009 By:/s/ James R. Musick___________ Name:  James R. Musick Title: President, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Vitro Diagnostics, Inc.
Case 3:20-cv-02653-MCR-GRJ Document 7 Filed 03/10/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:20-cv-02653-MCR-GRJ Document 7 Filed 03/10/20 Page 2 of 2
#### Semen LEYKIN, et al., petitioners, v. AT & T CORPORATION, et al.

No. 07-484.

Jan. 7, 2008.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied.
Case 3:20-cv-04698-TKW-HTC Document 20-1 Filed 04/23/20 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:20-cv-04698-TKW-HTC Document 20-1 Filed 04/23/20 Page 2 of 2
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 172 (Wednesday, September 5, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 54647]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-21858]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8011]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``African Art, New York, and the Avant-Garde''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``African Art, New York, and the Avant-
Garde,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at 
The Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York, New York from on or about 
November 26, 2012, until on or about April 14, 2013, and at possible 
additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the 
national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Ona M. Hahs, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6473). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: August 27, 2012.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-21858 Filed 9-4-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

 **KAPSTONEPAPER AND PACKAGING CORPORATION**

**SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY**

 
| **Consolidated  Subsidiaries**    | ** ** | **Organized Under Laws of** | ** ** | **Percentage Ownership** | ** ** |
|-----------------------------------|------------|-----------------------------|------------|--------------------------|------------|
|                              |       |                        |       |                     |       |
| KapStone  Kraft Paper Corporation |       | Delaware                    |       | 100                      | %          |
| KapStone  Charleston Kraft, LLC   |       | Delaware                    |       | 100                      | %          |
| COGEN  South LLC                  |       | Delaware                    |       | 100                      | %          |
| KapStone  Europe SPRL             |       | Belgium                     |       | 100                      | %          |
| KapStone  Asia Limited            |       | Hong Kong                   |       | 100                      | %          |

 

Non-ConsolidatedSubsidiaries

 

None

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHARLES GHEE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 419 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of March, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Deny and Opinion Filed August 7, 2014 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-14-00957-CV IN RE KERRY TIPPS, Relator Original Proceeding from the Criminal District Court No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F99-00280-QK 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices FitzGera ld, Francis, and Lewis Opinion by Justice FitzGerald Relator filed this petition for writ of mandamus requesting that the Court order the trial court to rule on his motion for fo rensic DNA testing. The facts an d issues are well known to the parties, so we do not recount them here. Relato r’s petition is not properl y supported and fails to comply with the rules of appellate procedure. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.3(j), (k); T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.7. “Those seeking the extraordinar y remedy of mandamus must follo w the applicable procedural rules. Chief among these is the cr itical obligation to provide the re viewing court with a complete and adequate record.” In re Le, 335 S.W.3d 808, 813 (Tex. A pp.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2011, orig. proceeding). Although the claims pleaded in pro se inmate petitions should be liberally construed, the same procedural standards apply to inmates at to other litigants. Barnes v. State , 832 S.W.2d 424, 426 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, no writ). If a pro se litigant is not required to comply with the applicable rules of procedure, he would be given an unfair advantage over a litigant who is represented by counsel. Holt v. F.F. Enterprises , 990 S.W.2d 756, 759–2– (Tex. App.—Amarillo 1998, pet. denied). There cannot be two sets of procedural rules, one for litigants with counsel and the other fo r litigants representing themselves. Mansfield State Bank v. Cohn , 573 S.W.2d 181, 184- 85 (Tex. 1978). Because the record before the court does not establish that relator is entitled to relief, we DENY the petition. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.8.

140957F.P05 /Kerry P. FitzGerald/ KERRY P. FITZGERALD JUSTICE
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Philip Gordon, Appellant.

Judgment convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of petit larceny and criminally concealing and withholding stolen goods, the subject of the larceny, and sentencing him to one year imprisonment on each count, to run consecutively, unanimously modified, on the law, to reverse the conviction of criminally concealing and withholding stolen goods and to strike defendant’s plea thereto, and as so modified, affirmed. The two crimes to which defendant pleaded arose out of his single act of larceny of the particular goods. Hence, it was improper to impose punishment for more than one of the crimes (Penal Law, § 1938; *People ex rel. Maurer*v. *Jackson,*2 N Y 2d 259, 264; *People*v. *Daghita,*301 N. Y. 223; *People*v. *Brien,*53 Hun 496; *People*v. *Volpe,*46 Misc 2d 958). Moreover, on receiving the plea, the court had knowledge that the goods which defendant stole were the same as to which he was pleading guilty of concealing and withholding, and hence, despite *People*v. *Foster*(19 N Y 2d 150), and *People*v. *Griffin*(7 N Y 2d 511, 516), this plea was improper under the above authorities. The plea, therefore, should not have been received (see *People*v. *Serrano,*15 N Y 2d 304). Concur — Botein, P. J., Steuer, Capozzoli, Tilzer and Witmer, JJ.
Move More. Getting more physical

activity every day will help you burn

more calories and lose weight. Try to get at least

30 minutes of physical activity, 5 days per week.

If you have not been active, start off slowly,

building up to your goal. 

Here are some ideas to fit more

physical activity into your day.

✓ When shopping, park a little farther away from

the store’s entrance. If it’s safe, get off the bus a

stop or two early and walk the rest of the way.

✓ When watching TV, use the commercial b

to take a quick walk around your home 

some exercises such as sit-ups, leg lifts, ma

in place, etc. 

✓ Try to schedule walking “dates” with frien

family members throughout the week.

✓ Try to get a “workout” during the day. Ta

walk during half of your lunch break. De

a message in person to a coworker instea

e-mailing it. Take the stairs to your office i

of the elevator. 

YOU DON’T HAVE TO KNOCK YOURSELF OUT TO PREVENT DIA

Studies show that people at high risk for diabetes can prevent the disease by 

losing a small amount of weight by getting 30 minutes of physical activity 

5 days a week and eating healthier. The key is: Small steps that lead to big rewards

Use these tips for ideas on moving more and eating healthier.

Take your first steps today!

1step
A message from the National Diabetes Education Program, sponsore

National Institutes of Health and the Centers for Disease Control and P

www.ndep.nih.gov

or chips, slice a few potatoes, sprinkle them

with a little oil, salt, and pepper, and bake

them in the oven. 

✓ Buy more fruits, vegetables, and whole grain

foods every time you shop. Try a new fruit or

vegetable each week. 

✓ Lighten your recipes by using low-fat or light

versions of ingredients such as sour cream,

cream cheese, or mayonnaise. 

✓ Make sure you always have a healthy snack

with you in case you get hungry, like a piece 

of fresh fruit, a handful of nuts, or a low-fat

yogurt.

✓ Serving sizes are often smaller than we think.

Use this chart as a guide for portion sizes:

1⁄

2 cup of rice or pasta =

An ice cream scoop

11⁄

2 ounces of cheese =

Four dice

3 ounces of meat or fish = 

Deck of cards or cassette tape

2 tablespoons peanut butter = 

A ping pong ball

Serving Size Suggestions

Start Your GAME PLAN 

Preventing Diabetes. T

to losing weight and preventing diabetes is t

long-term changes that work for you—not q

fixes. These tips are a great way to get you s

on your way to preventing diabetes but are 

the first steps.

To help you lose weight to prevent diab

the National Diabetes Education Progr

(NDEP) has created “Your GAME PLAN 

Preventing Type 2 Diabetes.” Order you

copy of the GAME PLAN to learn how 

goals, track your progress, and get mor

to help you reach your goals.

To get your free GAME PLAN

visit www.ndep.nih.gov or ca

1-800-438-5383.

step3
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

February 7, 2024

No. 04

- 22

- 00458

- CR

Abel C. ESQUIVEL

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 218th Judicial District Court

, Atascosa County, Texas Trial Court No. 19

- 08

- 0204

- CRA Honorable Lynn Ellison , Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is PERMANENTLY ABATED.

It is so ORDERED on February 7, 2024

.

_____________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez

, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 7th day of February, 2024

.

_____________________________ Tommy Stolhandske , Clerk of Court
Case 3:20-cv-04698-TKW-HTC Document 1-14 Filed 03/11/20 Page 1 of 8
Case 3:20-cv-04698-TKW-HTC Document 1-14 Filed 03/11/20 Page 2 of 8
Case 3:20-cv-04698-TKW-HTC Document 1-14 Filed 03/11/20 Page 3 of 8
Case 3:20-cv-04698-TKW-HTC Document 1-14 Filed 03/11/20 Page 4 of 8
Case 3:20-cv-04698-TKW-HTC Document 1-14 Filed 03/11/20 Page 5 of 8
Case 3:20-cv-04698-TKW-HTC Document 1-14 Filed 03/11/20 Page 6 of 8
Case 3:20-cv-04698-TKW-HTC Document 1-14 Filed 03/11/20 Page 7 of 8
Case 3:20-cv-04698-TKW-HTC Document 1-14 Filed 03/11/20 Page 8 of 8
2006-0938.

#### Taogaga v. Jeffreys.

In Habeas Corpus. On petition for wilt of habeas corpus of Max Taogaga. Sua sponte, cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 13.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of China Natural Resources, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Li
Feilie, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Li Feilie

Li Feilie
Chief Executive Officer
April 30, 2007
2006-0974.

#### State ex rel. Baja Marine Corp. v. Indus. Comm.

Franklin App. No. 05AP-555, 2006-Ohio-1646.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1980

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1980 appear at 80 FR 9905, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1980.473 Additional loans or advances.

(Refer to paragraph XIII of Form RD 449-35.)

## Administrative

Only the State Director shall approve within his/her loan approval authority additional nonguaranteed loans or advances prior to or subsequent to the issuance of the Loan Note Guarantee. The State Director shall determine that there will be no adverse changes in the borrower's financial situation and that such loan or advance is not likely to adversely affect the collateral or the guaranteed loan.
Editorial Note on Part 1962
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1962 appear at 80 FR 9902, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1962.16 Accounting by County Supervisor. The Agency will maintain a current record of each borrower's security. Whenever an inspection is performed, the borrower must advise the Agency of any changes in the security and will complete and sign Form RD 1962-1 in accordance with § 1924.56 if it has not been previously completed for the year. ( a ) *Agency responsibilities.* Chattel security will be inspected annually except in cases where the Agency official has justified in assessment or analysis review that no undue risk exists. An FO borrower who has been current with the Agency and who has provided chattels as additional security is an example of a case where an inspection may not be needed. All inspections will be recorded in the running record of the borrower's file. More frequent inspections should be made for delinquent borrowers or borrowers that have been indebted for less then 1 full crop year. The Agency official will discuss the provisions of §§ 1962.17 and 1962.18 and assist the borrower in completing the form. If a borrower does not plan to dispose of any chattel security, the form should be completed to show this and should be signed. When the Agency official has other contacts with the borrower, the official should also check for dispositions and acquisitions of security. Changes will be recorded on the form, dated and initialed by the borrower and the agency official. The purpose of all inspections is to: ( 1 ) Verify that the borrower possesses all the security,
( 2 ) Determine security is properly maintained, and
( 3 ) Supplement security instruments.
( b ) *Dispositions.* The County Supervisor will record all dispositions of chattel security on Form RD or its successor agency under Form RD 1962-1, and on the file copy of the security agreement or chattel mortgage. The original security instrument must not be altered. Additional acquired chattel security should be entered on the file copy of the security agreement or chattel mortgage and must be described on subsequent security instruments.
( c ) *Unapproved dispositions.* Unapproved dispositions of security will be handled in accordance with §§ 1962.18 and 1962.49 of this subpart.
[50 FR 45783, Nov. 1, 1985, as amended at 58 FR 46075, Sept. 1, 1993; 61 FR 35930, July 9, 1996]