alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Publication 3965 (Rev. 10-2004)

Catalog Number 33428Y

Got

Kids?

More 

information 

is provided

in Publication 972, 

Child Tax Credit

■ You may be 

 eligible

 for the 

 Child Tax 

 Credit and 

 the Additional

 Child Tax 

 Credit

If you qualify for the 

Child Tax Credit, you 

may qualify for the 

Additional Child Tax 

Credit.

Child 

Tax Credit

Child 

Tax Credit

Additional 

Child Tax 

Credit

On line

www.irs.gov

By Phone

1-800-829-3676

Publication 972

is available:
Child Tax Credit

The Child Tax Credit is a 

nonrefundable credit and may be 

as much as $1,000 per qualifying 

child depending upon your income.

The credit will be reduced if your 

adjusted gross income is over: ■ $110,000* and your filing status 

is married filing jointly 

■ $75,000* and your filing status 

is single, head of household, or 

qualifying widow(er) 

■ $55,000* and your filing status 

is married filing separately

*Special rules may apply if you have 

income from outside the U.S.

If you qualify for 

the Child Tax 

Credit, you may 

qualify for the 

Additional Child

Tax Credit.

Additional

Child Tax

Credit

■ The Additional Child Tax 

Credit is a refundable credit 

and may give you a refund 

even if you do not owe any 

tax. 

■ The credit is for certain 

individuals who receive less 

than the full amount of the 

Child Tax Credit. 

■ File Form 8812 to claim the 

Additional Child Tax Credit.

Who is a

qualifying

child?

Any child who: ■ Is your son, daughter, 

stepchild, adopted child, 

grandchild, or eligible 

foster child (must be placed 

with you by authorized 

placement agency and you 

cared for the child as you 

would your own),

■ Is under age 17 by December 31 of the year for

which you are claiming the 

credit on your tax return, 

■ Is a citizen or resident of 

the United States, and

■ Is claimed as your 

dependent.
## COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 15

- 00129

- CR

PAUL DOUGLAS WETZEL APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM CRIMINAL DISTRI CT COURT NO. 4 OF TA RRANT COUNTY TRIAL COURT NO. 1405 190W

----------


### MEMORAN DUM OPINION 1

---------- Appellant Paul Douglas Wetzel pled guilty to theft under $1,500 with two

prior theft convictions, a state jail felony, 2 and judicially confessed in exchange

for six months ’ confinement in a state jail facility. The trial court foll owed the plea

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

2 See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 31.03(e)(4)(D) (West Supp. 2014).2 bargain, convicted Appellant of the offense, and sentenced him to six months ’

confinement

.
The trial court ’ s certification states that the case was plea

- bargained and
that Appellant has no right of appeal

. Accordingly, we informed Appellant by

letter that th is case could be dismissed unless he or any party desiring to
continue the appeal showed grounds for continuing it

. 3 We did not receive a

response.
Accordingly, we dismiss th is appeal. 4

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER , JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: June 4, 2015

3 See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d).

4 See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f).
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS
National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) Program

 Go to:      NAWQA Home
Pesticide National Synthesis ProjectHomePublicationsNational StatisticsDataPesticide UseWater-Quality BenchmarksPNSP InternalPesticides in Ground Water U.S Geological Survey Fact Sheet FS-244-95 
Current Understanding of Distribution and Major Influences 

This report summarizes a comprehensive analysis of existing information on national and regional patterns of pesticides in the atmosphere and major influences on their sources and transport. It is one of a four-part series that synthesizes current knowledge and understanding of pesticides in water resources of the nation as part of the National Water-Quality Assessment. 
Bibliography of Studies Reviewed - 974 References Highlights- Over 300 studies of pesticide occurrences in ground water and soils have   been carried out during the past 30 years.   
- Pesticides from every major chemical class have been detected in ground   water.   
- Pesticides are commonly present in low concentrations in ground water   beneath agricultural areas, but seldom exceed water-quality standards.   
- Little information is available on pesticide occurrence beneath   non-agricultural land, such as residential areas and golf courses, despite   application rates that often exceed those for most crops.   
- Frequencies of pesticide detection are almost always low in low-use areas,   but vary widely in areas of high use.   
- Pesticide levels in ground water show pronounced seasonal variablity in   agricultural areas, with maximum values often following spring applications.   
- Factors most strongly associated with increased likelihood of pesticide   occurrence in wells are high pesticide use, high recharge by either   precipitation or irrigation, and shallow, inadequately sealed, or older wells.   
Pesticides in Ground Water- Pesticides in the Hydrologic System 
- Importance of Ground Water 
- Historical Study Efforts 
- Pesticides Found in Ground Water 
- Detection Frequencies in Relation to Use 
- Influence of Study Design and Seasonal Variability 
- Effects of Agricultural Practices and Well Construction 
- Influence of Hydrogeologic Factors 
- Prediction of Pesticide Occurrence 
- Significance to Water Quality 

AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological SurveyURL: http://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/pnsp/pubs/fs244-95/index.htmlPage Contact Information: nawqa_whq@usgs.govPage Last Modified: Friday, 23-Nov-2007 13:10:49 EST
Replevin.

#### Bloomer *vs.*Craig and Burgess.

[Mr. Apperson for appellant: Mr. Beatty for appellees.]

From the Circuit Court for Lawrence County.

*April*30.

The want of a sufficient bond, in replevin, (as required by the act of ’30,) may, it seems, be pleaded in abatement, under the restrictions applicable to pleas in abatement in general. But is no cause for dismissing the suit, upon motion.— The court should permit the pit f to give a sufficient bond, *nunc pro tunc,*or order a restitution of the property replevied.

Chief Justice Robertson

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

Bloomer having sued Craig and Burgess in replevin for a" horse, the Circuit Court, upon their motion, on the calling of the cause, considering the replevin bond insufficient, quashed it, and dismissed the suit: to reverse which judgment, this appeal is prosecuted..

The bond was certainly insufficient. But that fact, if it had been good cause of *abatement,*should, in order to have been entitled even to that effect, have been pleaded in apt form, and within proper time. The utmost power which, in our opinion, the Circuit Court had over the case; in consequence of the objection made to the bond, was to require either the execution of a sufficient bond, or a restitution of the horse. Even when a non-resident plaintiff shall have failed to give the bond for costs prescribed by statute as a pre-requisite to the institution of his suit, the Court cannot, upon motion, dismiss his suit, if he be willing then to execute a sufficient bond. But, in an action of replevin, the only object of the replevin bond being to secure a return of the property replevied, a quashal of the bond should only entitle the party sued to an order for restitution. And if the plaintiff had thereupon given a good bond, there could have been no ground for either ordering restitution or dismissing his suit. This we should not have doubted upon common law principles, without the aid of any statutory authority. Not only, however, does the statute regulating proceedings in replevin give no express authority to dismiss an action of replevin for want of a sufficient bond, but, had it done so, we should be of the opinion that the Court might and should, in analogy to the prescribed practise in *Appeals*and *Traverses*from Justices Courts to the Circuit Courts, and the establish*311ed practise in suits by non-residents, have permitted the execution of a proper bond when, without plea, an objection was made to the bond which had been given.

We are, therefore, of the opinion that the Circuit Court erred in dismissing this action on motion, without giving leave to file an unexceptionable bond.

Wherefore, the judgment of dismission is reversed, and the cause remanded.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE MOST RECENT ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
OF RESEARCH
FRONTIERS INCORPORATED FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       5,403,283
<SECURITIES>                                 1,189,386
<RECEIVABLES>                                   3,071
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,728,453
<PP&E>                                         269,084
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,021,291
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          280,802
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    10,929,041
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,021,291
<SALES>                                        108,735
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               660,686
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,278,627
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,617,941)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,617,941)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.24)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**Theundersigned officer of **Standard Aero Holdings, Inc.**herebycertifies pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to suchofficer’s knowledge that: 1. the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Standard AeroHoldings, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of Standard Aero Holdings, Inc.     Date:November 14, 2005           By: /s/ David Shaw      Name: David Shaw  Title: Chief Executive Officer     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether madebefore or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.
Exhibit
      32.2




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
      THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Chardan North China Acquisition
      Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007
      (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof, I Kerry Propper, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company,
      certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Dated:
                July 2, 2007
            CHARDAN
                NORTH CHINA ACQUISITION CORPORATIONBy:
            /s/
                Kerry PropperKerry
                Propper
              Chief
                Financial Officer and Secretary
              (Principal
                Accounting and Financial Officer)
#### § 1900.1 General.

The authorities contained in this subpart apply to all assets, functions, and programs now or hereafter administered or serviced by the Rural Development, including but not limited to those relating to indebtedness, security, and other assets obtained or contracted through the Secretary of Agriculture, Resettlement Administration, Farm Security Administration, or Emergency Crop and Feed Loan Offices of the Farm Credit Administration, the Soil Conservation Service in connection with water conservation and utilization projects; the Puerto Rico Hurricane Relief Commission and successor agencies in connection with Puerto Rico Hurricane relief loans to individuals; State Rural Rehabilitation Corporations, the United States of America or its officials as trustees of the assets of State Rural Rehabilitation Corporations, Regional Agricultural Credit Corporations, Defense Relocation Corporations, land leasing and purchasing associations, corporations, and agencies, and whether the interest of the United States in the indebtedness, instrument of debt, security, security instrument, or other assets is that of obligee, owner, holder, insurer, assignee, mortgagee, beneficiary, trustee or other interest. This subpart is inapplicable to Farm Service Agency, Farm Loan Programs.

[44 FR 18162, Mar. 27, 1979, as amended at 80 FR 9866, Feb. 24, 2015]
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the

__________ District of __________ 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Plaintiff(s)

v. Civil Action No.

Defendant(s)

SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

To: (Defendant’s name and address)

A lawsuit has been filed against you.

Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

whose name and address are:

If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint. 

You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

CLERK OF COURT

Date:

Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk

Case 3:20-cv-03678-MCR-EMT Document 10 Filed 12/10/20 Page 1 of 2
AO 440 (Rev. 06/12) Summons in a Civil Action (Page 2)

Civil Action No.

PROOF OF SERVICE

(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (l))

This summons for (name of individual and title, if any)

was received by me on (date) .

’ I personally served the summons on the individual at (place)

on (date) ; or

’ I left the summons at the individual’s residence or usual place of abode with (name)

, a person of suitable age and discretion who resides there,

on (date) , and mailed a copy to the individual’s last known address; or

’ I served the summons on (name of individual) , who is

 designated by law to accept service of process on behalf of (name of organization)

on (date) ; or

’ I returned the summons unexecuted because ; or

’ Other (specify):

.

My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .

I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.

Date:

Server’s signature

Printed name and title

Server’s address

Additional information regarding attempted service, etc:

Case 3:20-cv-03678-MCR-EMT Document 10 Filed 12/10/20 Page 2 of 2
§ 1720.14 Nature of guarantee; acceleration of guaranteed bonds. ( a ) Any guarantee executed by the Secretary under this part shall be an obligation supported by the full faith and credit of the United States and incontestable except for fraud or misrepresentation of which the guaranteed bondholder had actual knowledge at the time it purchased the guaranteed bonds.
( b ) Amounts due under the guarantee shall be paid within 30 days of demand by a bondholder, certifying the amount of payment then due and payable.
( c ) The guarantee shall be assignable and transferable to any purchaser of guaranteed bonds as provided in the bond documents.
( d ) The following actions shall constitute events of default under the terms of the guarantee agreements: ( 1 ) The guaranteed lender failed to make a payment of principal or interest when due on the guaranteed bonds;
( 2 ) The guaranteed bonds were issued in violation of the terms and conditions of the bond documents;
( 3 ) The guarantee fee required by 7 CFR 1720.10 of this part, has not been paid;
( 4 ) The guaranteed lender made a misrepresentation to the Secretary in any material respect in connection with the application, the guaranteed bonds, or the reporting requirements listed in 7 CFR 1720.12; or
( 5 ) The guaranteed lender failed to comply with any material covenant or provision contained in the bond documents.
( e ) In the event the guaranteed lender fails to cure such defaults within the notice terms and the timeframe set forth in the bond documents, the Secretary may demand that the guaranteed lender redeem the guaranteed bonds. Such redemption amount will be in an amount equal to the outstanding principal balance, accrued interest to the date of redemption, and prepayment premium, if any. To the extent the Secretary makes any payments under the guarantee, the Secretary shall be deemed the guaranteed bondholder.
( f ) To the extent the Secretary makes any payments under the guarantee, the interest rate the government will charge to the guaranteed lender for the period of default shall accrue at an annual rate of the greater of 1.5 times the 91-day Treasury-Bill rate or 200 basis points (2.00%) above the rate on the guaranteed bonds.
( g ) Upon guaranteed lender's event of default, under the bond documents, the Secretary shall be entitled to take such other action as is provided for by law or under the bond documents.
#### § 29.3546 Sound.

Free of damage.

[30 FR 9207, July 23, 1965. Redesignated at 49 FR 16759, Apr. 20, 1984]
#### § 28.401 Good Middling Color.

Good Middling Color is color which is within the range represented by a set of samples in the custody of the United States Department of Agriculture in a container marked “Original Official Cotton Standards of the United States, American Upland, Good Middling, effective July 1, 1987.”
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

MICHAEL T. MARCUM,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 4:20-cv-134-AW-MAF

MARK INCH, et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

I have considered the magistrate judge’s June 23 Report and 

Recommendation. ECF No. 19. No objections have been filed. The Report and 

Recommendation is adopted and incorporated into this order. The motion for 

preliminary injunction (ECF No. 2) is DENIED as moot. The magistrate judge will 

conduct further proceedings as appropriate.

SO ORDERED on July 31, 2020. 

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00134-AW-MAF Document 22 Filed 07/31/20 Page 1 of 1
#### § 22.204 Rural development committees.

State rural development committees, consisting of USDA agency members and, in most instances, State governments and other Federal agency representatives are available to assist States in accomplishing their rural development objectives. Such assistance if requested by the State can take the form of technical assistance and cooperative services to States in carrying out their rural development priorities.
Work Assignment 1-07, Amendment 2 

Contract EP-C-07-028 

TITLE: Ethanol Evaluation on Nonroad Engines 

Period of Performance: Effective Date through June 30, 2009 

Work Assignment Manager (WAM): Cheryl Caffrey (734) 214-4849 

Fax (734) 214-4050 

caffrey.cheryl@epa.gov

Alternate WAM: Phil Carlson (734) 214-4270 

Fax (734) 214-4050 

carlson.philip@epa.gov

 

Level of Effort: No additional LOE is added 

Purpose of the Amendment: 

Through discussion between EPA and ARB, engines currently being tested under the ARB 

program are going to be used for EPA purposes. 

Task 9 shall be changed as follows: 

The contractor shall add the sampling of ammonia, speciation of HC, and PM/ECOC/sulfate on 

one emission test per small SI engine, per ARB E0 and ARB E10 fuels, to the ARB engine 

exhaust emission testing currently underway. The specific PM measurement system shall be the 

47mm system. 

The first two engines under ARB’s test program shall be completed without this additional 

sampling. This additional work shall begin with the third engine. A total of 10 engines will 

be tested with the additional sampling 

If not included in the ARB work, the contractor shall analyze the FID’s response to ethanol and 

aldehydes and present the information in the report. This information will be used along with the 

ethanol and aldehyde measurements to assure we are not double counting hydrocarbons. 

One nonhandheld and one handheld engine shall be emission tested once each using fuels 

Indolene and EPAct #18 (which will be provided by EPA). This shall be done upon completion 

of emission testing with ARB test fuels. The nonhandheld engine shall be the Honda 4.3hp 

engine, if available, and the handheld engine shall be an Echo engine, if available, on ARB’s list 

of engines. All emission results (including information from ARB) from these engines shall be 

reported to EPA. 
Task 5: 

Remove this task from the work plan. Based on initial investigation from SwRI, it is determined 

that the vast majority of new nonroad motorcycles are now certified with 4 stroke engines. 

Exceptions to this are 2 stroke competition nonroad motorcycles and these engines do not have 

to meet emission requirements and the vehicles are small in number. Emission standards began 

in 2006 and hence in-use two stroke nonroad motorcycles will be of greater interest based on 

contribution to inventories. 

EPA anticipates that Task 9 can be completed within the current period of performance and that 

the hours removed and the hours added are equal. A work plan is not required; however, a 

revised cost estimate is required.