alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### S. Tribble, Sr. *vs.*W. Frame et al.

fhessRAss. Case 179,

Error to the Clarke Circuit; Clarke, Judge.

Trespass, *action of.*

*October*24.

See ease.

Chief Justice Robertson

delivered the Opinion of *the Co nit*

This is an action of assault and battery, instituted by Samuel Tribble, Sr. fora battery by William Frame, Jr. and others, in the same affray described in Tribble et al. vs. Frame, (supra.) Upon issues like those made up in that case, the jury, *619in this case, found a verdict for the defendants, and judgment was rendered accordingly, after a motion for a new trial had been overruled.

*Monroe*and *Haggin>*for plaintiffs] *-Hctp$on¡*fpr defendants.

For the reasons given in the case referred to, we. are of the opinion that the defendants were wrongful assailants, according to legal deductions from the facts as we are disposed to think they ought to have been considered by the jury. And, therefore,we think the plaintiff was entitled to a new trial.

Wherefore, the judgment is reversed, and the cause-, remanded for a new trial.
## U NITED 

## S TATES 

## N AVY



## – M ARINE 

## C ORPS 

## C OURT OF 

## C RIMINAL 

## A PPEALS

_________________________ No. 2016003 11

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.


### DALLAS L. TIBBETTS Hospital Corpsman Apprentice (E

- 2 ) , U.S. Navy

Appellant

____________________

_____ Appeal from the United States Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Captain Ann K. Minami, JAGC, USN

. Convening Authority: Command ing Officer
, Naval Air Station, Lemoore, CA

. Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation : Lieutenant Commander

Ma tthew S. Bailey, JAGC, USN. For Appellant: Captain James Kresge, USMCR

. For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq

.

_________________________ Decided 14 February 2017

_________________________ Before M ARKS , F ULTON , and P ETTIT , Appellate Military Ju dges

_________

________________ After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

For the C ourt

R.H. TROIDL Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2251 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2251

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 30, 2013

 Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the United States courthouse and Federal building located 
 at 118 South Mill Street, in Fergus Falls, Minnesota, as the ``Edward 
       J. Devitt United States Courthouse and Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse and Federal building located at 118 
South Mill Street, in Fergus Falls, Minnesota, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Edward J. Devitt United States Courthouse and 
Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse and Federal 
building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to 
the ``Edward J. Devitt United States Courthouse and Federal Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 28, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### In re WILKIN.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

July 12, 1906.)

In the matter of the final judicial settlement of the accounts of 4nna M. C. Wilkin, as trustee, etc.

No opinion. Order made and entered herein by this court January 5, 1904 (86 N. Y. Supp. 360), modified, so as to permit payments of trust funds herein, upon conditions specified in the order.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

      
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information taken from the balance
sheet as of June 30, 1996 and the statement of operations for the
twelve-month period ended March 31, 1996, and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements.
       
<S>                                           <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-1-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                            359,600
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     235,549
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                         6,337
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  601,986
<PP&E>                                            728,998
<DEPRECIATION>                                    722,992
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    659,799
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             512,762
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                          268,830
<OTHER-SE>                                       (869,431)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      659,799
<SALES>                                           562,161
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  994,080
<CGS>                                             320,429
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   2,100,246
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,106,166)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,106,166)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,106,166)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.04)
        

</TABLE>
*Monday, August 3, 1998*

MOTION DOCKET

96-2350.

#### Smith v. Granville Twp. Bd. of Trustees.

Licking App. No. 96CA98. This cause came on for further consideration upon appellees’ motion for stay pending appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for stay be, and hereby is, denied.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cascade Technologies Corp. (the Company) on Form 10QSB/ Amendment #1  for the period ended May 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Periodic Report), I, Bruce Hollingshead, Chief Executive Officer and I, Christine Thomas, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Dated:

August 27, 2007

/s/ Bruce Hollingshead

Bruce Hollingshead, CEO





/s/ Christine Thomas

Christine Thomas, CFO
#### Nick De Fabio, Jr., Respondent, v. Nadler Rental Service, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Margaret Associates, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. Eugene Held, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff; General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corp., Ltd., Third-Party Defendant.

Orders of the Supreme Court, Orange County, dated November 30, 1966 affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order of said court, dated December 6, 1966, dismissed, without costs. No appeal lies from an order denying reargument. The lengthy delay of defendant Margaret Associates, Inc., in making the motion to amend its answer so as to deny making a leasing agreement precludes this court from granting relief *(Sarullo*v. *Newstand Realty Corp.,*2 A D 2d 854 [2d Dept. 1956]; *Luback*v. *Hirsch,*232 App. Div. 691 [2d Dept. 1931]). The motion was not made until almost a year after the death of defendant Held, the president of appellant, Margaret Associates, Inc., although it had knowledge since at least May, 1965 of the supposed defect in its answer. Despite the general rule in favor of free amendment of the pleadings (CPLR 3025, subd. [b]), where amendment would result in substantial prejudice to one of the parties because of something which has happened in the interim between the original pleading and the application to amend, and such harm could not be cured by the court, it would be an improvident exercise of discretion to allow such amendment *(Washington Life Ins. Co.*v. *Scott,*119 App. Div. 847 [1st Dept, 1907]; *Lentini*v. *St. Vincent’s Hosp.,*19 A D 2d 652 [2d Dept. 1963]; 3 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N. Y. Civ. Prac., par. 3025.16 [1966]). Where the party who wishes to amend has or should have knowledge of the facts which he wishes to put in his later pleadings, but refrains from moving to amend for an inexcusably long period of time, his motion will be denied because of gross laches *(Jennings*v. *Perkins,*277 App. Div. 1143 [2d Dept. 1950] ; *Loureiro*v. *Long Is. R. R. Co.,*22 A D 2d 763 [2d Dept. 1964]). Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
149 So.2d 764

#### C. Franklin McCARTER et al. v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH et al.

No. 46529.

Feb. 8, 1963.

Writ refused. The result is correct.
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 23.1








                          Consent of Ernst & Young LLP


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8, File No. 33-40184) pertaining to the 1982 Incentive Stock Option Plan
and the 1989 Incentive Stock Option Plan of Jones Pharma Incorporated (Form S-8,
File No. 333-15879) pertaining to the 1994 Formula Stock Option Plan for
Non-Management Directors and the 1994 Incentive Stock Plan of Jones Pharma
Incorporated of our report dated February 10, 1999, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Jones Pharma Incorporated
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
March 26, 1999
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Chardan South China Acquisition
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31, 2006
(the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I Kerry Propper, Chief Executive Officer and Secretary of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Kerry Propper                               Dated: May 19, 2006
---------------------------------------
Kerry Propper
Chief Executive Officer and Secretary
(Principal Executive Officer)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

**DANNY ISIMINGER, INDIVIDUALLY AND TDBA ISIMINGER'S TOWING SERVICE,** 

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**BRENDA DAVIS,**

**Respondent :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 244 WAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 24th day of November, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of** 

**Appeal is** DENIED

**.**
Exhibit 32.2





Certification of Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of SRKP 2, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony C. Pintsopoulos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Anthony C. PintsopoulosAnthony C. PintsopoulosPrincipal Financial OfficerMay 11, 2011
#### § 27.55 Requirements in lieu of cotton class certificates on delivery day.

If on the morning of the delivery day specified in the transferable notice the cotton class certificates covering the cotton involved are not ready for delivery when called for, the tenderer of the cotton shall present to the receiver a receipt issued by an exchange inspection agency certifying that warehouse receipts, listed by lot numbers, representing cotton weighed and sampled in an approved warehouse under the supervision of such agency, have been received by the exchange inspection agency and are in the custody of the Cotton Division Marketing Services Office where certification requests are required to be filed. The requirements of §§ 27.52-27.55 shall be complied with prior to delivery by the tenderer of the agency's receipt to the receiver. Upon issuance by Marketing Services Office, the tenderer shall furnish to the receiver the cotton class certificates complying with the regulations in this subpart, showing the cotton to be tenderable on a basis grade contract.

[50 FR 47707, Nov. 20, 1985]
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Mills, Appellant.

[Cite as *State v. Mills*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 111.]

(No. 97-2290

Submitted August 19, 1998

Decided September 16, 1998.)

*Alan R. Mayberry,*Wood County Prosecuting Attorney, and *Gary D. Bishop,*Chief Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

*J. Scott Hicks,*Wood County Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, *Jeffrey S. Sutton,*State Solicitor, and *Simon B. Karas,*Deputy Chief Counsel, urging affirmance for *amicus curiae,*state of Ohio.

*Maureen O’Connor,*Summit County Prosecuting Attorney, and *Paul Michael Marie,*Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, urging affirmance for *amicus curiae,*Ohio Prosecuting Attorneys Association.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of *State v. Rush*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 53, 697 N.E.2d 634.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Resnick, J., not participating.
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.11

Description of Director's Deferred Compensation Plan

Under the Director's Deferred Compensation Plan, directors who are not officers
of Castle have the option to defer payments of the retainer and meeting fees in
either a stock equivalent unit account or an interest account. Fees held in the
interest account are credited with interest at the rate of six percent per year
compounded annually. Fees deferred in the stock equivalent accounts are divided
by Castle's common stock price on the 15th day after the meeting for which
payment is made to yield a number of stock equivalent units. The stock
equivalent account is credited on the dividend payment date with stock
equivalent units equal to the product of the declared dividend per share
multiplied by the number of stock equivalent units in the director's account on
the record date of the dividend. Disbursement of the interest account and the
stock equivalent unit account can be made only upon a director's resignation,
retirement or death. If payment from the stock equivalent unit account is made
in shares of Castle's common stock, it will be made as of the date of the
request or termination event, whichever occurs last.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                              5
       
<S>                                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      NOV-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                         DEC-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                           NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                                  3,045,000
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           2,091,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                              250,000
<INVENTORY>                                             2,487,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        7,657,000
<PP&E>                                                  8,190,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                          5,953,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          9,994,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   2,589,000
<BONDS>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                                  465,000
<OTHER-SE>                                             11,154,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            9,994,000
<SALES>                                                19,488,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       19,488,000
<CGS>                                                  16,139,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          16,139,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         35,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (1,964,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                               27,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (1,991,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                             (.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             (.45)
        


</TABLE>
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 192 

To require that, in cases in which the annual trade deficit between the 

United States and another country is $10,000,000,000 or more for 

3 consecutive years, the President take the necessary steps to create 

a more balanced trading relationship with that country. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2013 

Ms. KAPTUR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To require that, in cases in which the annual trade deficit 

between the United States and another country is 

$10,000,000,000 or more for 3 consecutive years, the 

President take the necessary steps to create a more 

balanced trading relationship with that country. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Balancing Trade Act 

5 of 2013’’. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•HR 192 IH

1 SEC. 2. ACTION BY THE PRESIDENT IN CASES OF LARGE 

2 CONSECUTIVE ANNUAL TRADE DEFICITS 

3 WITH OTHER COUNTRIES. 

4 (a) ACTION BY THE PRESIDENT.—If in 3 consecutive 

5 calendar years the United States has a trade deficit with 

6 another country of $10,000,000,000 or more, the Presi7 dent shall take the necessary steps to create a trading re8 lationship with the country that would eliminate or sub9 stantially reduce that trade deficit, by entering into an 

10 agreement with that country or otherwise. 

11 (b) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘trade 

12 deficit’’ means, with respect to the United States and an13 other country, that the value of goods and services that 

14 are products of that country and are imported into the 

15 United States from that country exceeds the value of 

16 goods and services that are products of the United States 

17 and are exported from the United States to that country. 

18 (c) REPORTS.— 

19 (1) INITIAL REPORT.—Not later than 3 months 

20 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 

21 President shall submit to the Congress a report set22 ting forth— 

23 (A) the likely reasons for the trade deficits 

24 with each country to which subsection (a) ap25 plies, as of the date of the report; and 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with 
3 

•HR 192 IH

1 (B) the steps the President intends to take 

2 under subsection (a) with respect to each such 

3 country. 

4 (2) ANNUAL REPORTS.—The President shall 

5 submit to the Congress, not later than December 31 

6 of each year, a report on actions taken to carry out 

7 this section. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Chardan North China
Acquisition Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
September 30, 2006 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I Li Zhang, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


By: /s/ Li Zhang                                        Dated: November 14, 2006
-----------------------------------
Li Zhang
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)