alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5
       
<S>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                       MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          0
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                0
<PP&E>                                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           0
<BONDS>                                         0
<COMMON>                                     6000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                                  (6000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    0
<SALES>                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                0
<CGS>                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                0      
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 0
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             0
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE REGISTRANT'S
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1997, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         81,280
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,839,555
<ALLOWANCES>                                   286,400
<INVENTORY>                                    27,789,250
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               32,515,433
<PP&E>                                         31,505,981
<DEPRECIATION>                                 17,838,896
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 46,550,126
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          24,724,247
<BONDS>                                        1,384,010
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       37,289
<OTHER-SE>                                     16,260,552
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   46,550,126
<SALES>                                        155,623,213
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               155,623,213
<CGS>                                          105,605,396
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  105,605,396
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               49,044,756
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,556,314
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (481,998)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   389,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (870,998)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (870,998)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.23)
        


</TABLE>
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
registration statements of Sepragen Corporation on Form S-8 (File
Nos. 33-95182 and 333-11903) of our report, which includes an
explanatory paragraph regarding the Company's ability to continue
as a going concern, dated February 28,  1997, on our audit of the
financial statements of Sepragen Corporation for the year ended
December 31, 1996,  which report is included in the Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB.











COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
/s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
San Francisco, California
April 24,  1998
#### §§ 1775.25-1775.30 [Reserved]
#### Robert R. Baron, Appellant, v. Walco Corp. et al., Respondents.

Order entered December 24, 1968, denying temporary injunction unanimously reversed on the law and the facts and temporary injunction granted, with $30 costs and disbursements to appellant, on order to be settled conditioned on plaintiff’s filing a security company bond in the sum of $10,000. Plaintiff licensed Southway Corporation to market its patented product. Defendant Warner is the sole beneficial stockholder of Southway. In the license agreement Southway and Warner agreed not to permit others to use the product or to disclose any information in regard to it. The agreement was allowed to lapse and Southway without objection forfeited a sum deposited in escrow. Immediately thereafter Warner organized defendant Walco, which proceeded to market a product very similar to plaintiff’s. Warner’s explanation of these events is replete with inconsistencies, contradictions and statements difficult to believe. Undoubtedly plaintiff will suffer irreparable injury if Walco is permitted to market its product and it should appear that defendants have wrongfully appropriated it. Under these circumstances, a temporary injunction should issue (CPLR 6301; cf. *Spiselman*v. *Rabinowitz,*270 App. Div. 548). Settle order on notice. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Tilzer, Markewich, Nunez and Steuer, JJ.
§ 23.4 State Rural Development Advisory Council. ( a ) The chief administrative officer of the administratively responsible State Land Grant University will appoint a State Rural Development Advisory Council with membership as set forth in section 504(e) of title V. The function of the Council shall be to review and approve annual program plans conducted under title V. The Council will also advise the chief administrative officer on all matters pertaining to the authorized programs.
( b ) The Chairman of the State Rural Development Advisory Council will insure that programs proposed under title V including regional programs applicable within the State are not inconsistent with and are, to a maximum extent practicable, in consonance with other rural development programs and activities approved in that State.
( c ) Those elements of the research and extension plan which would impact directly on rural development activities being developed or pursued by States will be considered jointly by the State Rural Development Advisory Council and appropriate State agencies to assure a constructive reinforcement of those State activities.
# Latest Issue

      - *RBS Currents* 9.1 - Fall/Winter 2005
      - September 30, 2005 marks the conclusion of the Eisenhower Consortia for Mathematics and Science Education and the Eisenhower National Clearinghouse. In this issue of RBS Currents we celebrate the last 13 years of service to the educational community by reflecting on the services and products that RBS has provided. We begin with both a look back and a look ahead from RBS Executive Co-Director Keith Kershner. Historical accounts of RBS' involvement in the dissemination of TIMSS and lesson study are featured, as are a variety of programs and accomplishments within each of the mid-Atlantic states that RBS serves.

# Archive

      - *RBS Currents* 8.2 - Spring/Summer 2005
      - No Child Left Behind (NCLB) presents assessment and data requirements that are more rigorous than ever before in the history of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. This issue of Currents explores assessment and evaluation and how to make use of the rich information they can provide. It begins with an article on NCLB’s assessment and data requirements and then broadens the perspective by examining four international assessments. Several articles show how educators are preparing for the science assessments that NCLB requires of each state by the 2007-2008 school year. In addition, there is much news to report at RBS and in the mid-Atlantic region. This edition of Currents will update you on our projects and services, all aimed at improving the quality of teaching and eliminating the achievement gap.
      - *RBS Currents* 8.1 - Fall/Winter 2004
      -  This issue of RBS Currents focuses on NCLB’s definition of “highly qualified,” the response of the mid-Atlantic states, and the resources to support educators in understanding this requirement of NCLB. Other articles present resources for assessing teaching quality, interesting data on the charac teristics of teachers in our region, and a glimpse into how students perceive teaching quality. Find out about assessment for learning—a practice that may help to improve both teaching quality and student achievement scores. And explore some of the professional development resources that RBS supports to im prove the quality of teaching and eliminate the achievement gap.

      - Feedback
      - About *RBS Currents*
      - *RBS Currents* Home

*RBS Currents* is based on work sponsored wholly or in part by the Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, U.S. Department of Education, under contract number R319A000009-03. It does not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of Education or any agency of the U.S. government.

This publication is in the public domain and may be reproduced without permission. Please acknowledge the source as Research for Better Schools.

    - Feedback
    - About *RBS Currents*
    - *RBS Currents* Home
info@rbs.org
# DRAFT Life Cycle Cost Analysis: Clothes Washers James E.McMahon Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory JEMcMahon@lbl.gov 

### At DOE Workshop, Washington, D.C. July23, 1997 * ^ : * *. ' ; . ** ^. .' ' ; - * . '* ^~~~~~~~~~~~~IS

# Ideas foreliminating "black boxes" i 

### Make models as simple as possible Make copies of models more accessible - available from USDOE or contractor - on World WideWeb 

### Make modelseasierto use - Graphical user interface - Develop detailed documentation 

### Conducttraining workshops - central location (e.g., publicworkshop) - on-site atstakeholder location - computer linkor - videoconference EnergyAnalysis Program

# Life Cycle Cost Spreadsheet :?1 Graphical user interface * Menus ofalternative assumptions - Future energy prices - Baseline efficiency - Standard level 

### User control of inputs - Start date - Discount rate - Override feature (e.g., appliance price) EnergyAnalysis Program 5

# Life Cycle Cost includes: * Appliance price (+ installation cost) * Operating expenses - energy - water and sewage - maintenance - service 

### * Lifetime * Discount rate Energy Analysis Program

# Clothes washer LCC: Energy expenses

* Clotheswasher
- electricity 

### * Water heater (byfueltype)
- electricity - natural gas - fuel oil -LPG - other (kerosene, coal, coke, wood, solar) - none 

### * Clothes dryer (byfueltype)
- electricity - natural gas - none EnergyAnalysis Program

## Uncertainty analysis -Zr * Identify key uncertainties and variabilities - uncertainty: incomplete information - variability: range ofvalues 

### * Estimate ranges ratherthan pointvalues - minimum, likeliest, maximum values 

### * Express output as ranges - (e.g., percent of consumers having lower life cycle cost) 

### · Conduct scenario ("what-if') analysis - (e.g., future energy prices) EnergyAnalysis Program
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENSACOLA DIVISION 

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCTS LIABILITY 

LITIGATION Judge M. Casey Rogers 

 Magistrate Judge Hope T. Cannon 

This Document Relates to All Cases 

Case No. 3:19-md-02885 

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL 

PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 11.1(H)(1)(B) AND REQUEST FOR 

REMOVAL FROM SERVICE LIST 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, effective immediately, Hillary A. Anderson is 

no longer with the firm Vorys, Sater, Seymour, and Pease, LLP, and hereby 

withdraws as attorney of record for Defendant 3M Company (“Defendant”) in the 

above referenced multi-district litigation, and should be removed from the docket 

and electronic service list accordingly. As required by Local Rule 11.1 (H)(1)(b), 

Defendant consents to this withdrawal, and the withdrawal will leave Defendant with 

counsel of record who will continue in the case. 

Dated: February 16, 2023 Respectfully submitted, 

By: /s/ Hillary A. Anderson

Hillary A. Anderson, D.C. Bar No. 1613040 

Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease, LLP 

200 Public Square, Suite 1400 

Cleveland, OH 44114-6314 

Telephone: (216) 479-6100 

Email: haanderson@vorys.com

Counsel for Defendant 3M Company 

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3673 Filed 02/16/23 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on February 16, 2023, a true copy of the foregoing was 

filed on the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to all parties 

and counsel in this case. 

/s/ Hillary A. Anderson 

Hillary A. Anderson 

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3673 Filed 02/16/23 Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0057

IN THE MATTER OF:

D.A.T.,

A Youth.

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until May 17, 2021, to prepare, 

file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief. 

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

April 15 2021

04/15/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0057
IIB 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2167 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 13, 2013 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 

Urban Affairs 

AN ACT 

To authorize the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development to establish additional requirements to improve the 

fiscal safety and soundness of the home equity conversion 

mortgage insurance program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2167 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reverse Mortgage Sta3 bilization Act of 2013’’. 

4 SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL SAFETY AND SOUNDNESS REQUIRE5 MENTS FOR HOME EQUITY CONVERSION 

6 MORTGAGE INSURANCE PROGRAM. 

7 Subsection (h) of section 255 of the National Hous8 ing Act (12 U.S.C. 1715z–20(h)) is amended— 

9 (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

10 end; 

11 (2) in paragraph (2), by striking the period at 

12 the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

13 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

14 paragraph: 

15 ‘‘(3) establish, by notice or mortgagee letter, 

16 any additional or alternative requirements that the 

17 Secretary, in the Secretary’s discretion, determines 

18 are necessary to improve the fiscal safety and sound19 ness of the program authorized by this section, 

20 which requirements shall take effect upon 

21 issuance.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives June 12, 2013. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


sroberts on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

RECEIVED 

MAY -5 2014 

HEARING DOCKET 

In the Matter of: 

Ridan Investments, Inc., 

Respondent. 

) FAA Docket No. [TBA] 

) FDMS No. FAA-2013-1082 

) FAA Case No. 2012S0700133 

) 

) Judge: Richard C. Goodwin 

) 

) Region: Western-Pacific 

) 

) 

) AMENDED NOTICE OF 

) APPEARANCE 

) 

Pursuant to section 13.33 of the Rules of Practice in FAA Civil Penalty Actions, 

the, Federal Aviation Administration, hereby amends its original Notice of Appearance 

and designates the following Attorney as counsel in the captioned case: 

Courtney Adolph, Attorney 

Office of the Regional Counsel, A WP-7.4 

P.O. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

Phone (310) 725-7128 

Facsimile, (31 0) 725-6816 

Email: Courtney.Adolph@faa,gov 

Respectfully submitted, 

NAOMI TSUDA 

Regional Counsel 

By:~- Courtney Adolph 

General Attorney · 
ERRATA SHEET 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The amended Notice of Appearance is being issued to correct the FDMS No. 

cited on the caption page. 

I hereby certify that the attached Notice of Appearance in the Matter of Ridan 

Investments, Inc., has been sent to the following parties, via certified mail, return 

receipt requested, or via facsimile where indicated below. 

Hon. Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DB 20590 

Attn: Patricia Matthews 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Via Certified Mail to: 

Lawrence M. Burek (Counsel for the Respondent) 

550 North Parkcenter Drive, Suite 204 

And to: 

Santa Ana, CA 92705 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Ave., S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attn.: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl 000 

FAX: 202-493-5142 

£P~~ tomaGarcta 

Paralegal, Enforcement 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Lawndale, California 90261 

Dated: Aprill5, 2014 

2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.
PEDRO GARCIA

- BANOS , a.k.a. PEDRO BANOS

- GARCIA,
Defendant

- Appellant. No s. 16

- 10480 16

- 1048 1
D.C. No s. 2:16

- cr
- 00172

- DJH 4:12

- cr
- 02509

- DJH
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Diane J. Humetewa , District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 23 , 2017 * *
Before: LEAVY , WATFOR D, and FRIEDLAND , Circuit Judges

. In these consolidated appeals, Pedro Garcia

- Banos appeals the 70

- month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to reentry of a removed alien , in
viol ation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 , and consecutive 21

- month sentence im posed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisd iction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

OCT 27 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 10480 & 16

- 10481 and we vacate and remand for resentencing

. Garcia

- Banos contends that the district court failed to appreciate its discretion to impose a partially concurrent sentenc e
. At sentencing, Garcia

- Banos requested that the court run his sentences partially concurrently. T he government responded that it doubted the lawfulness of a partially concurrent sentence. The court did not resolve the dispute so we cannot determine wh ether the district court understood its discretion to impose a partially concurrent sentence. See U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3(d) & cmt. n.4(C) (district court may impose sentence on a new offense to run consecutively, concurrently, or partially concurrently to undis charged term of imprisonment resulting from revocation of supervised release)

. Under these circumstances, we vacate Garcia

- Banos’s sente nce and remand for resentencing.
See United States v. Henderson , 649 F.3d 955, 964 (9th Cir. 2011).
VACATED and REMAND ED for resentencing
.
OSWER/OSRTI State, Tribal, and Site Identification Branch Washington, DC 20460 

## N ATIONAL 

## P RIORITIES 

## L IST 

## (NPL)
***Proposed Site*** March 2010 

### VIENNA WELLS Vienna, Missouri Maries County

 Site Location: The Vienna Wells site is located in Maries County, Vienna, Missouri. The site is located on a low ridge that lies between the Gasconade and Maries River Valley.

 Site History: The Vienna Wells site includes three contaminated public drinking water wells and the suspected source area, the former Langenberg Hat Factory facility. The Langenberg Hat Factory facility operated from 1952 until 1996. In 2007, Missouri Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) Public Drinking Water Branch (PDWB) requested an investigation to determine the source of tetrachloroethylene (PCE) in the Vienna Wells public drinking water supply. Based on the investigation, MDNR determined the Langenberg Hat Factory facility was a suspected source of the PCE contamination.

 Site Contamination/Contaminants: PCE has been detected in Well #1 and Well #3 over a ten-year period. Site Inspection sampling in 2007 and 2008 confirmed the presence of PCE in the public drinking water wells and in the distribution system, indicating there is actual exposure to PCE. The most recent sampling results for Well #3 indicate concentrations exceeding the Safe Drinking Water Act Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) for PCE in November 2008, February 2009, May 2009, and August 2009.

 Potential Impacts on Surrounding Community/Environment: The City of Vienna public drinking water Well #3 is the primary water source for approximately 628 residents, Well #1 is currently operating as an emergency standby and supplemental water supply well and Well #2 was taken out of service in 2007 due to aesthetic reasons. The PDWB monitoring documents that levels of PCE have been increasing in Vienna Well #3 since 1997 and now exceed the MCL.

 Response Activities (to date): The City of Vienna has secured funding for an air stripper project.

 Need for NPL Listing:
The State of Missouri referred the site to EPA. Other fe deral and state cleanup programs were evaluated, but were not viable at this time. EPA received a letter of support for placing this site on the NPL from the Governor.

[The description of the site (release) is based on information av ailable at the time the site was evaluated with the HRS. The d escription may change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination.]

For more information about the hazardous substances identified in this narrative summary, including general information regardi ng the effects of exposure to these substances on human health, please see the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) ToxFAQs. ATSDR ToxFAQs can be found on the Internet

at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaq.html or by telephone at 1-888-42-ATSDR or 1-888-422-8737.