alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 215.5 Method of payment to States. ( a ) Funds to be paid to any State shall be made available by means of Letters of Credit issued by FNS in favor of the State agency. The State agency shall: ( 1 ) Obtain funds needed to reimburse School Food Authorities and child-care institutions through presentation by designated State officials of a Payment Voucher on Letter of Credit (Treasury Form GFO 7578) in accordance with procedures prescribed by FNS and approved by the U.S. Treasury Department;
( 2 ) Submit requests for funds only at such times and in such amounts as will permit prompt payment of claims;
( 3 ) Use the funds received from such requests without delay for the purpose for which drawn. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions, if funds are made available by Congress for the operation of the Program under a continuing resolution, Letters of Credit shall reflect only the amount available for the effective period of the resolution.
( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) The State agency shall release to FNS any Federal funds made available to it under the Program which are unobligated at the end of each fiscal year. Release of funds by the State agency shall be made as soon as practicable but in no event later than 30 days following demand by FNSRO, and shall be reflected by a related adjustment in the State agency's Letter of Credit.
[Amdt. 13, 39 FR 28416, Aug. 7, 1974, as amended by Amdt. 14, 41 FR 31174, July 27, 1976]
#### § 227.42 Grant closeout procedures.

The requirements of 2 CFR part 200, subpart D, and USDA implementing regulations 2 CFR part 400 and part 415, are applicable in the termination of any grant under this part.

[44 FR 28282, May 15, 1979, as amended at 81 FR 66493, Sept. 28, 2016]
§ 225.12 Claims against sponsors. ( a ) The State agency shall disallow any portion of a claim for reimbursement and recover any payment to a sponsor not properly payable under this part, except as provided for in § 225.10(c). State agencies shall consider claims for reimbursement not properly payable if a sponsor's records do not support all meals claimed and include all costs associated with the Program sufficient to justify that reimbursements were spent only on allowable Child Nutrition Program costs. However, the State agency shall notify the sponsor of the reasons for any disallowance or demand for repayment.
( b ) Minimum State agency collection procedures for unearned payments shall include: ( 1 ) Written demand to the sponsor for the return of improper payments;
( 2 ) If after 30 calendar days the sponsor fails to remit full payment or agree to a satisfactory repayment schedule, a second written demand for the return of improper payments, sent by certified mail, return receipt requested;
( 3 ) If after 60 calendar days following the original written demand, the sponsor fails to remit full payment or agree to a satisfactory repayment schedule, a third written demand for the return of improper payments, sent by certified mail, return receipt requested;
( 4 ) If after 90 calendar days following the original written demand, the sponsor fails to remit full payment or agree to a satisfactory repayment schedule, the State agency shall refer the claim against the sponsor to the appropriate State or Federal authorities for pursuit of legal remedies.
( c ) If FNS does not concur with the State agency's action in paying a sponsor or in failing to collect an overpayment, FNS shall notify the State agency of its intention to assert a claim against the State agency. In all such cases, the State agency shall have full opportunity to submit evidence concerning the action taken. The State agency shall be liable to FNS for failure to collect an overpayment unless FNS determines that the State agency has conformed with this part in issuing the payment and has exerted reasonable efforts in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section to recover the improper payment.
( d ) The amounts recovered by the State agency from sponsors may be utilized to make Program payments to sponsors for the period for which the funds were initially available and/or to repay the State for any of its own funds used to make payments on claims for reimbursement. Any amounts recovered which are not so utilized shall be returned to FNS in accordance with the requirements of this part.
[54 FR 18208, Apr. 27, 1989, as amended at 83 FR 25360, June 1, 2018]
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. 3:96cr80/LAC

3:01cv148/LAC

STEVEN ANTHONY GRAHAM

ORDER

The defendant has filed a notice of appeal/application for certificate of appealability

(doc. 204) and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. (Doc. 206). Defendant

appeals the court’s denial of his motion to modify and/or vacate district court order, and

now asks that this motion be construed as having been filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.

60(b). (See Doc. 204). Unless a certificate of appealability is issued, the defendant may

not take an appeal from the final order denying a Rule 60(b) motion. Gonzalez v. Secretary

of Department of Corrections, 317 F.3d 1308, 1312 (11th Cir. 2003). A certificate of

appealability should not issue with respect to such a motion unless the petitioner/defendant

shows, at a minimum, that it is debatable among jurists of reason whether the district court

abused its discretion in denying the motion. See Mobley v. Head, 306 F.3d 1096, 1097

(11th Cir. 2002). Because the court finds the defendant has not made the requisite

showing, his request for a certificate of appealability is DENIED. The court also finds that

the appeal is not taken in good faith and defendant is not otherwise entitled to proceed in

forma pauperis. Fed.R.App.P. 24(a)(3). Therefore, his motion for leave to so proceed is

Case 3:96-cr-00080-LC-CJK Document 208 Filed 10/02/08 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 3:96cr80/LAC; 3:01cv148/LAC

denied. Defendant shall pay the $455.00 filing fee within thirty days.

DONE AND ORDERED this 2nd day of October, 2008.

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:96-cr-00080-LC-CJK Document 208 Filed 10/02/08 Page 2 of 2
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

)

INDEPENDENT PARTY OF )

FLORIDA and PARTY FOR )

SOCIALISM AND LIBERATION, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) Case No. 4:20-cv-00110-MW-CAS

)

LAUREL M. LEE, Florida )

Secretary of State, in her official )

capacity, )

)

Defendant. )

)

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the Parties, through their 

respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate to dismiss this action with 

each party to bear its own costs.

Case 4:20-cv-00110-MW-MAF Document 56 Filed 09/25/20 Page 1 of 3
2

Dated this 25th day of September, 2020.

Respectfully submitted,

THE BERNHOFT LAW FIRM, S.C.

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

By: /s/ Daniel J. Treuden

Daniel J. Treuden

Admitted pro hac vice

1402 E. Cesar Chavez Street

Austin, Texas 78702

telephone: (512) 582-2100

facsimile: (512) 373-3159

djtreuden@bernhoftlaw.com

FLORIDA DEPT. OF STATE

Counsel for Secretary of State

By: /s/ Ashley E. Davis

Bradley R. McVay (FBN 79034)

General Counsel

Ashley E. Davis (FBN 48032)

Deputy General Counsel

Colleen O’Brien (FBN 76578)

Assistant General Counsel

R.A. Gray Building, Suite 100

500 South Bronough Street

Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250

telephone: (850) 245-6536

facsimile: (850) 245-6127

Case 4:20-cv-00110-MW-MAF Document 56 Filed 09/25/20 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The foregoing document was served on the Defendant by the ECF 

system at the time of filing:

ashley.davis@dos.myflorida.com

Deputy General Counsel Ashley E. Davis

brad.mcvay@dos.myflorida.com

General Counsel Brad R. McVay

Attorneys for:

Laurel M. Lee, Florida Secretary of State

R.A. Gray Building, Suite 100

500 S. Bronough Street

Tallahassee, Florida 32399

Signed this 25th of September, 2020.

 /s/ Daniel J. Treuden

Daniel J. Treuden

Case 4:20-cv-00110-MW-MAF Document 56 Filed 09/25/20 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I,
Bradford R. Rich, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of SkyWest, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of and for the periods presented in this report.

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
February 26, 2008

|/s/BRADFORD R. RICHBradford R. Rich
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks
V 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2082 

To authorize and request the President to award the Medal of Honor to 

James Megellas, formerly of Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, and currently 

of Colleyville, Texas, for acts of valor on January 28, 1945, during 

the Battle of the Bulge in World War II. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 21, 2013 

Mr. PETRI introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To authorize and request the President to award the Medal 

of Honor to James Megellas, formerly of Fond du Lac, 

Wisconsin, and currently of Colleyville, Texas, for acts 

of valor on January 28, 1945, during the Battle of 

the Bulge in World War II. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2082 IH

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORIZATION AND REQUEST FOR AWARD 

2 OF MEDAL OF HONOR TO JAMES MEGELLAS 

3 FOR ACTS OF VALOR DURING BATTLE OF 

4 THE BULGE. 

5 (a) AUTHORIZATION.—The President is authorized 

6 and requested to award the Medal of Honor under section 

7 3741 of title 10, United States Code, to James Megellas, 

8 formerly of Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, and currently of 

9 Colleyville, Texas, for the acts of valor described in sub10 section (b). 

11 (b) ACTION DESCRIBED.—The acts of valor referred 

12 to in subsection (a) are the actions of James Megellas on 

13 January 28, 1945, in Herresbach, Belgium, during the 

14 Battle of the Bulge, during World War II, when, as a first 

15 lieutenant in the 82d Airborne Division, he led a surprise 

16 and devastating attack on a much larger advancing enemy 

17 force, killing and capturing a large number and causing 

18 others to flee, single-handedly destroying an attacking 

19 German Mark V tank with two hand-held grenades, and 

20 then leading his men in clearing and seizing Herresbach. 

21 (c) WAIVER OF TIME LIMITATIONS.—The award 

22 under subsection (a) may be made without regard to the 

23 time limitations specified in section 3744(b) of title 10, 

24 United States Code, or any other time limitation estabVerDate Mar 15 2010 02:53 May 22, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2082.IH H2082

tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2082 IH

1 lished by law or regulation with respect to the awarding 

2 of certain medals to persons who served in the Army. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

CESAR SERGE,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 4:20cv101-MW/MAF

UNITED STATES DRUG

ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant.

___________________________/ 

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING 

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report 

and Recommendation. ECF No. 5. Upon consideration, no objections having been 

filed by the parties,

IT IS ORDERED:

The report and recommendation is accepted and adopted as this Court’s 

opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “Plaintiff’s complaint, ECF No. 1, 

is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.” The 

Clerk shall also close the file.

SO ORDERED on April 22, 2020.

s/Mark E. Walker 

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00101-MW-MAF Document 9 Filed 04/22/20 Page 1 of 1
### Fw: Follow-up calls on SO2 NAAQS--need some help understanding what we're doing on Thursday Michael Stewart to: Tricia Crabtree 05/03/2010 01:41 PM Michael J. Stewart, Ph.D. Environmental Protection Specialist Health and Environmental Impacts Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 (919) 541-7524 stewart.michael@epa.gov ----- Forwarded by Michael Stewart/RTP/USEPA/US on 05/03/2010 01:41 PM -----

From: Richard Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi

_ R.

_ King@omb.eop.gov>, Heidi King <hking@omb.eop.gov>, James Hemby/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Michael Stewart/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Scott Mathias/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 05/03/2010 01:39 PM Subject: RE: Follow-up calls on SO2 NAAQS--need some help understanding what we're doing on Thursday I had assumed the first was on the standard and the second on the implementation, which covers the monitoring/modeling. Whatever works best, but when we try and do all together, we never get time for the implementation side, so that's why we proposed 2 separate meetings. Plus, we would not have to have all the implementation folks on the first call if we're focusing just on the standard. Hoping to maximize folks time as well.
Chet

_

______________________________________ _ Richard A. "Chet" Wayland Director, Air Quality Assessment Division U.S. EPA Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards (919) 541-4603 Lydia Wegman 05/03/2010 01:35:16 PM I need some clarification of what we're doing on...
From: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US To: Richard Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Heidi King <hking@omb.eop.gov> Cc: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi

_ R.

_ King@omb.eop.gov>, James Hemby/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Michael Stewart/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Scott Mathias/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 05/03/2010 01:35 PM Subject: RE: Follow-up calls on SO2 NAAQS--need some help understanding what we're doing on Thursday I need some clarification of what we're doing on Thursday. Is the first meeting in the morning just to discuss the standard and nothing about monitoring, modeling and implementation? If so, we don't need a full hour for that meeting, as it will not take us long to explain the standard and the basis for the decision. We had thought we could use the first meeting to go over the specifics of the entire package, including an overview of the monitoring and implementation provisions, and the general role to be played by modeling, and then have a further discussion on SO2 modeling in the afternoon. Please let me know if this makes sense to the two of you or if you want to have just a NAAQS discussion in the morning, in which case we'll shorten the morning meeting. Thanks. Richard Wayland 05/03/2010 12:30:38 PM Great! We'll set it up for 2pm Thursday. ______... "King, Heidi R." 05/03/2010 12:13:41 PM 2pm sounds pretty good! heidi
Adopted - 

April 30, 2008 

This docket only includes portions of the SJV 2008 PM2.5 Plan. The entire plan is available at: 

http://www.valleyair.org/Air_Quality_Plans/AQ_Final_Adopted_PM25_2008.htm
San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District 

1990 E. Gettysburg Avenue 

Fresno, CA 93726 

(559) 230-5800 

www.valleyair.org
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          56,581
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             194
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                36,747
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    178,403
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         128,240
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           133,040
<LOANS>                                      1,197,895
<ALLOWANCE>                                     15,090
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,182,805
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,373,372
<SHORT-TERM>                                    47,685
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             15,174
<LONG-TERM>                                     60,929
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,779    
<OTHER-SE>                                     139,064
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,646,003
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                104,539
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               16,390
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,618
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               122,547
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              52,035
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              57,845
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           64,702
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    2,826
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 194
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 41,354
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,336
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      29,336
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,325
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.08
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.71
<LOANS-NON>                                     10,606
<LOANS-PAST>                                       392
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                12,319
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,747
<RECOVERIES>                                       363
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               15,090
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            15,090
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
§ 247.28 Storage and inventory of commodities. ( a ) *What are the requirements for storage of commodities?* State and local agencies must provide for storage of commodities that protects them from theft, spoilage, damage or destruction, or other loss. State and local agencies may contract with commercial facilities to store and distribute commodities. The required standards for warehousing and distribution systems, and for contracts with storage facilities, are included in § 250.12 and § 250.14 of this chapter.
( b ) *What are the requirements for the inventory of commodities?* A physical inventory of all USDA commodities must be conducted annually at each storage and distribution site where these commodities are stored. Results of the physical inventory must be reconciled with inventory records and maintained on file by the State or local agency.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0584-0293) [70 FR 47063, Aug. 11, 2005, as amended at 85 FR 68722, Oct. 30, 2020]
1

2

3

4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 A B C D E F G H I J K L M O P Q R S T U V W 

# Subgrant Awards Table(Date) 

## Grantee name

Subgrantee Name Year ___ Subgrantee Start and End Date Year __ Subgrantee Award Amount (Federal) Year ___ Subgrantee

Award Amount (Intermediary Match)Year ___ Subgrantee Award Total (Federal + Intermediary Match) Automatically Populated Year____Subgrantee

Match Funds Raised Year ____ Subgrantee

Match Funds ExpendedYear ____ Subgrantee Federal Funds ExpendedYear ____ Subgrantee Intermediary Funds Expended Year ___ Subgrantee

Start and End Date Year ___ Subgrantee Award Amount (Federal) Year __ Subgrantee

Award Amount (Intermediary Match) Year __ Subgrantee

Award Total (Federal + Intermediary Match) Automatically Populated Year____

Subgrantee Match Funds Raised Year ____

Subgrantee Match Funds Expended Year ____

Subgrantee Federal Funds Expended Year ____

Subgrantee Intermediary Funds Expended Year ___

Subgrantee Start and End Date Total

Subgrantee Funds Awarded (Federal and Intermediary) (Automatically Populated) Subgrantee

Match Funds Raised (Cummulative to Date) (Automatically Populated) Subgrantee

Match Funds Expended (Cummulative to Date) (Automatically Populated)Subgrantee Federal

Funds Expended (Cummulative to Date) (Automatically Populated)

Subgrantee 1 0 0

Subgrantee 2 0 0 Subgrantee 3 0 0 Subgrantee 4 0 0