alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 12690-003]

                    a.                     *Date and Time of Meeting:*                     Monday, November 15, 2010 starting at 12 p.m. and ending by 2 p.m. (Eastern Standard Time).                

                    b.                     *FERC Contact:*                     David Turner, (202) 502-6091 or                     *david.turner@ferc.gov.*

                    c.                     *Purpose of Meeting:*                     Commission staff will meet with the Snohomish County Public Utility District (District) to clarify the Commission's August 6, 2010, request for additional information on the District's draft license application for the Admiralty Inlet Pilot Tidal Project, which would be located in the Puget Sound, in Washington.                

d. If you would like to attend the meeting or have any questions, contact David Turner via e-mail by November 11, 2010.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-29060 Filed 11-17-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
EXHIBIT 10.26

                        CONVERSION ELECTION LETTER DATED
                        NOVEMBER 7, 2006 FROM HENRY ZAKS







<PAGE>




CHINA WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.



TO:               Henry Zaks

CC:               Mike Bowden
                  Robert Paradine

FROM:    Pete Racelis

DATE:    November 7, 2006

SUBJECT: Payment of Loans

Henry:

Please see enclose stock certificate for 249,663 shares of restricted (Rule 144)
company stock as conversion for the loans you've made as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Principal                       Interest                            Total                      Shares Issued
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                        <C>                                <C>                             <C>
            $7,680.00                      $259.44                            $7,939.44                       198,486
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            $2,000.00                       $47.06                            $2,047.06                        51,177
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                              $9,986.50                       249,663
                                                                ----------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>


The total amount loaned to the company was $9,986.50. The conversion was made at
$0.04 per share which equals 249,663 shares of restricted stock.

Again, thank you very much for your support and patience.

Regards,


/s/ PEDRO E. RACELIS III





          1746 Cole Boulevard, Suite 225, Golden, Colorado 80401-3210,
                     Office 303.277.9968, Fax 303.484.3794
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

WENDY KERNECHEL,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:20cv78–WS/MJF

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

and JIMMY HIGHSMITH,

Defendant.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF.

No. 47) docketed October 12, 2022. The magistrate judge recommends that

Plaintiff’s case against the United States and Jimmy Highsmith be dismissed with

prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). No objections to the report and

recommendation have been filed.

The court having reviewed the record, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF No. 47) is

ADOPTED and incorporated into this order by reference.

Case 4:20-cv-00078-WS-MJF Document 48 Filed 11/11/22 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

2. Plaintiff’s claims against the United States and Jimmy Highsmith are 

DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2). 

3. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: “All claims against the United

States and Jimmy Highsmith are dismissed with prejudice.

4. The clerk shall close the case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 11th day of November , 2022.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:20-cv-00078-WS-MJF Document 48 Filed 11/11/22 Page 2 of 2
Child 

Tax Credit

If you qualify for the Child 

Tax Credit, you may 

qualify for the 

Additional Child 

Tax Credit

Additional

Child Tax

Credit You may be 

eligible for the 

Child Tax Credit 

and the Additional 

Child Tax Credit

Got

Kids?

More 

information 

is provided in 

Publication 972, Child 

Tax Credit

Publication 972

is available:

 On line

 www.irs.gov

 By phone

 1-800-829-3676

Publication 3965 (Rev. 8-2006)

Catalog Number 33428Y

Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service
Child Tax Credit

The Child Tax Credit is a 

nonrefundable credit and may be 

as much as $1,000 per qualifying 

child depending upon your 

income.

The credit will be reduced if your 

adjusted gross income is over:

■ $110,000* and your filing 

status is married filing jointly

■ $75,000* and your filing status 

is single, head of household, 

or qualifying widow(er)

■ $55,000* and your filing status 

is married filing separately

* Special rules may apply if you have 

income from outside the U.S.

* If you have a qualifying child for 

Child Tax Credit but the child is not 

claimed as your dependent, you must 

complete Form 8901, Information 

on Qualifying Children Who Are Not 

Dependents, to claim the credit.

If you qualify for the 

Child Tax Credit, you may 

qualify for the Additional 

Child Tax Credit.

■ The Additional Child Tax Credit 

is a refundable credit and may 

give you a refund even if you do 

not owe any tax.

■ The credit is for certain 

individuals who receive less 

than the full amount of the Child 

Tax Credit.

■ File Form 8812 to claim the 

Additional Child Tax Credit.

Additional Child 

Tax Credit

Who is a qualifying child?

All of the following tests must be met to claim 

someone as a qualifying child* for the child 

tax credit.

Relationship test:

The child must be your son, daughter, stepson, 

stepdaughter, legally adopted child or a child 

lawfully placed with you for legal adoption, 

brother, sister, stepbrother, stepsister, foster 

child placed with you by an authorized 

placement agency or by a court order, or a 

descendant of any such person. 

Residency test:

You and the child must have the same 

principle place of abode for more than half of 

the year (except for temporary absences).

Age test:

The child must be under the age 17 by 

December 31 of the calendar year in which 

your tax year begins.

Support test:

The child may not have provided over half of 

his or her own support for the calendar year 

in which your tax year begins.

Citizen, resident, or national test:

The child must be a United States citizen, 

United States national, or a resident of the 

United States.

An exception may apply if the parents of a 

child are divorced, separated, or living apart. 

See Publication 501, Exemptions, Standard 

Deduction, and Filing Information.
#### CITY OF BRISTOL *v.*DAVID FIERSTON ET AL.

(AC 23874)

Schaller, DiPentima and Berdon, Js.

Argued December 1

officially released December 30, 2003

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed.
The proposals are selected on a competitive basis andare due to EPA by **December 18, 2000**. Copies of the proposal also must be sent to the applicable EPA regionaloffice by the same deadline.  Addresses for EPA headquarters and theregional offices are contained in the proposal guidelines document. Proposal guidelines can be obtained by downloading them from EPA�swebsite at or by calling the Superfund Hotline at (800) 424-9346 or(703) 412-9810.This document was last update on November 06, 2000
EXHIBIT
23.1
 
 Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 
 The
Employee Benefits Committee
 Noble
Energy, Inc. Thrift and Profit Sharing Plan:
 
 We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (File
No. 333-118976) on Form S-8 of Noble Energy, Inc. of our report dated June 5,
2009, relating to the statements of net assets available for benefits of the
Noble Energy, Inc. Thrift and Profit Sharing Plan as of December 31, 2008
and 2007, and the related statements of changes in net assets available for
benefits for the years then ended, and the supplemental schedule H, line 4i –
schedule of assets (held at end of year) as of December 31, 2008, which
report appears in the December 31, 2008 Annual Report on Form 11-K of Noble
Energy, Inc. Thrift and Profit Sharing Plan.
 
 /s/ KPMG
LLP
 
 Houston,
Texas
 June 5,
2009
  1
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2185 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2185

  To amend title 36, United States Code, to encourage the nationwide 
        observance of two minutes of silence each Veterans Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2013

   Mr. Lynch (for himself, Ms. Clarke, Mr. Conyers, Mr. Hastings of 
   Florida, Ms. Jackson Lee, Mr. Jones, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Markey, Mr. 
McGovern, Mr. Michaud, Mr. Neal, Mr. Pocan, and Ms. Tsongas) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 36, United States Code, to encourage the nationwide 
        observance of two minutes of silence each Veterans Day.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Day Moment of Silence 
Act''.

SEC. 2. OBSERVANCE OF VETERANS DAY.

    (a) Two Minutes of Silence.--Chapter 1 of title 36, United States 
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 145. Veterans Day
    ``The President shall issue each year a proclamation calling on the 
people of the United States to observe two minutes of silence on 
Veterans Day in honor of the service and sacrifice of veterans 
throughout the history of the Nation, beginning at--
            ``(1) 3:11 p.m. Atlantic standard time;
            ``(2) 2:11 p.m. eastern standard time;
            ``(3) 1:11 p.m. central standard time;
            ``(4) 12:11 p.m. mountain standard time;
            ``(5) 11:11 a.m. Pacific standard time;
            ``(6) 10:11 a.m. Alaska standard time; and
            ``(7) 9:11 a.m. Hawaii-Aleutian standard time.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for chapter 1 of 
title 36, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
following new item:

``145. Veterans Day.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Annual  Report of IR  BioSciences  Holdings,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
Wilhelm, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                               /s/ Michael Wilhelm
                              -----------------------
                              Chief Executive Officer
                              March 28, 2006

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, an other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section  906,  has been  provided to Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
**EXHIBIT        32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.        SECTION 1350,

AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In        connection with the quarterly report of Banner Resources Inc. (the “Company”)        on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert Krause,        Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company,        certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)                    or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

         

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all                    material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                    Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Date: | February 19, 2008 |
|-------|-------------------|

By:/s/ Robert Krause                                                            

       Robert        Krause

President and Treasurer

Principal Executive Officer andPrincipal Financial

and Accounting Officer

         

13 

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-8064

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

GREGG LAMONT SMITH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.

(8:02-cr-00215-AW; 8:05-cv-02532-AW)

Submitted: July 31, 2007 Decided: August 15, 2007

Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregg Lamont Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Michael R. Pauze, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Gregg Lamont Smith seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, entered

on July 17, 2006. According Smith the benefit of Fed. R. App. P.

4(c) and Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988), the earliest date

his notice of appeal may be deemed filed is December 5, 2006,

beyond both the sixty-day appeal period under Fed. R. App. P.

4(a)(1)(B), and the thirty-day excusable neglect period allowed

under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5). 

We construe Smith’s notice of appeal, in which he alleged

he did not timely receive the district court’s final order, as a

motion to reopen the time to note an appeal under Fed. R. App. P.

4(a)(6). See United States v. Feuver, 236 F.3d 725, 729 & n.7

(D.C. Cir. 2001). Accordingly, we remand the case to the district

court for the limited purpose of permitting that court to determine

whether Smith can satisfy the requirements for reopening the appeal

period set forth in Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). See Ogden v. San Juan

County, 32 F.3d 452, 454 (10th Cir. 1994). The record, as

supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further

consideration.

REMANDED
July 26, 2000

Nicholas Fund, Inc.
700 North Water Street
Milwaukee, WI 53202

Gentlemen:

      We have acted as counsel to Nicholas Fund, Inc. ("Fund"), a
corporation organized under the laws of the State of Maryland, in
connection  with  the preparation and filing  of  a  registration
statement  on  Form  N-1A  and amendments thereto  ("Registration
Statement"), relating to the registration of the common stock  of
the  Fund  ("Common Stock") under the Securities Act of 1933,  as
amended.

      We  have reviewed the Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws
of the Fund and the Registration Statement; we have also reviewed
such  corporate  records and other documents and have  made  such
examinations of law as we have deemed necessary for  purposes  of
the  opinion  hereinafter  expressed.  We  have  assumed  without
independent  verification the genuineness of signatures  and  the
conformity  with originals of all documents submitted  to  us  as
copies.  Based upon the foregoing, we are of the opinion that:

          1.   The Fund is a corporation, duly organized and
     legally  existing  under  the  laws  of  the  State  of
     Maryland.

           2.    The Fund is authorized to issue up  to  two
     hundred  million (200,000,000) shares of Common  Stock,
     par  value  $.50  per  share,  including  those  shares
     currently issued and outstanding.

           3.   The shares of Common Stock to be offered for
     sale  pursuant to the Registration Statement have  been
     duly  authorized and, upon the effectiveness  of  Post-
     Effective   Amendment  No.  47  to   the   Registration
     Statement  and compliance with applicable  federal  and
     state  securities  laws  and  regulations,  when  sold,
     issued (within the limits authorized under the Articles
     of   Incorporation  of  the  Fund)  and  paid  for   as
     contemplated in the Registration Statement, such shares
     will  have been validly and legally issued, fully  paid
     and non-assessable.

           4.    Post-Effective  Amendment  No.  47  to  the
     Registration Statement does not contain any disclosures
     which  would  render it ineligible to become  effective
     under Rule 485(b) under the Securities Act of 1933.

      We  consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit  to
the  Registration Statement and to the references to  us  in  the
prospectus  comprising Part A and elsewhere in  the  Registration
Statement.

                                   Sincerely yours,

                                   /s/ DAVIS & KUELTHAU, S.C.

                                   DAVIS & KUELTHAU, S.C.
steam_record - Re: RRI Request for ICR Extension 

 

Greetings, 

This e-mail is a confirmation that your extension request for the steam electric effluent 

guidelines questionnaire was received. Extension requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case 

basis. Please be aware that submittal of an extension request to EPA does not alter the due date

of your questionnaire unless and until EPA agrees to the extension and establishes a new date.

Sincerely, 

-----"Smith, James R. (Randy)" <JRSmith@rrienergy.com> wrote: ----- 

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

From: "Smith, James R. (Randy)" <JRSmith@rrienergy.com> 

Date: 06/25/2010 12:22PM 

Subject: RRI Request for ICR Extension 

From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: "Smith, James R. (Randy)" <JRSmith@rrienergy.com>

Date: 6/28/2010 3:48 PM

Subject: Re: RRI Request for ICR Extension

Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C28C440DO... 3/17/2011
Alicea, please find attached RRI correspondence for EPA’s consideration to extend the 

deadline to complete and comply for the RRI steam-electric generating facilities Effluent ICR 

requirements.

If there are any questions, do not hesitate to contact me.

Randy Smith 

Engineering & Technical Services 

832-357-4632 (NEW) 

832-357-7420 Fax

[attachment "RRI corporate Extension Request Letter.pdf" removed by Jezebele 

Alicea/DC/USEPA/US] 

Page 2 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C28C440DO... 3/17/2011
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2012-NM-156-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

INDEPENDENT PARTY OF FLORIDA

and PARTY FOR SOCIALISM AND

LIBERATION

VS CASE NO. 4:20-cv-00110-MW-MAF

LAUREL M LEE, SECRETARY OF

STATE IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY 

JUDGMENT

This case is dismissed without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)

with each party to bear its own costs.

 September 25, 2020

JESSICA J. LYUBLANOVITS

CLERK OF COURT

s/Betsy Breeden

DATE Deputy Clerk: Betsy Breeden

Case 4:20-cv-00110-MW-MAF Document 58 Filed 09/25/20 Page 1 of 1