alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Subchapter C of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter C appear by Amdt. 381, 65 FR 64586, Oct. 30, 2000.

§ 283.32 ALJ's initial decision. ( a ) The ALJ shall decide the appeal not later than 60 days after receipt of rebuttal evidence submitted by the State agency pursuant to § 283.8 or, if the State agency does not submit rebuttal evidence, not later than 90 days after the State agency submits the notice of appeal and evidence in support of the appeal. The ALJ may extend this deadline for cause shown.
( b ) The ALJ shall prepare, upon the basis of the record, and shall file an initial decision which shall include a decision on a request for good cause relief, a copy of which shall be served upon each of the parties.
( c ) Such initial decision shall constitute the final notice of determination for purposes of judicial review without further proceedings, unless there is a motion for reconsideration filed pursuant to § 283.17(d) or review by the Judicial Officer is sought pursuant to § 283.20.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Enrique Rivera, Appellant.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered on March 6, 1979, unanimously affirmed. Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. (See *Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People*v *Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur—Birns, J. P., Fein, Markewich, Lupiano and Bloom, JJ.
#### Sadie Eisner et al., Appellants, v. Daitch Crystal Dairies, Inc., Respondent.

Judgment, entered on a verdict in favor of defendant on issue of liability, unanimously reversed and vacated, on the law, on the facts and in the interests of justice, and a new trial ordered on said issue, with $50 costs and disbursements to abide the event. It appears that if the plaintiff had been permitted to recall herself, her testimony may have contradicted, impeached or discredited material testimony of defendant’s witness, the store manager. Therefore, it was an abuse of discretion for the trial court to deny plaintiffs’ right to testify in rebuttal following the close of defendant’s case. (See *Ankersmit*v. *Tuch,*114 N. Y. 51; see, also, 8 Carmody-Wait 2d, New York Practice, § 56:107.) Furthermore, on the record here, there was no justification for the questioning of plaintiffs’ counsel by the trial court, in the presence of the jury, as to whether or not there had been a motion made to dismiss the case for failure to prosecute and, when counsel refused to answer the question, for the trial court to state, “ I’m not going to force you to answer it and the jury can draw their own conclusions.” Plaintiffs’ motion for a mistrial, then made, should have been granted. (See *Habenicht*v. *RKO Theatres,*23 A D 2d 378; *Salzano*v. *City of New York,*22 A D 2d 656.) Finally, the charge of the trial court with reference to the issues and applicable law appertaining to the alleged negligence of the defendant was inadequate, and this requires a new trial in the interests of justice. *(Poyas*v. *RKO Theatres,*14 A D 2d 358; *U. S. Vitamin & Pharmaceutical Corp.*v. *Capitol Cold Storage Co.,*21 A D 2d 661.) Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Eager, Rabin and McNally, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32





CASCADE TECHNOLOGIES CORP.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cascade Technologies Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending February 28, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jacqueline Danforth, as Principal Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: April 19, 2010
By:
/s/Jacqueline DanforthName:
Jacqueline DanforthTitle:
Principal Financial Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.)
Exhibit 7



Computation of Ratios for Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016



|                                |  |  |  |            |  |  |            |  |  |          |  | 
|------------------------------- |  |  |  | ---------- |  |  | ---------- |  |  | -------- |  | 
|                                |  |  |  | 2014       |  |  | 2015       |  |  | 2016     |  | 
|                                |  |  |  | CNY000    |  |  | CNY000    |  |  | CNY000  |  | 
|                                |  |  |  | (Restated) |  |  | (Restated) |  |  |          |  | 
|Current assets (a)              |  |  |  | 63,150     |  |  | 57,580     |  |  | 36,242   |  | 
|Current liabilities (b)         |  |  |  | 37,827     |  |  | 123,889    |  |  | 76,296   |  | 
|Current ratio (c=a/b)           |  |  |  | 1.67       |  |  | 0.46       |  |  | 0.48     |  | 
|Working capital (d=a-b)         |  |  |  | 25,323     |  |  | (66,309)   |  |  | (40,054) |  | 
|Total interest-bearing debt (i) |  |  |  |           |  |  |           |  |  |         |  | 
|Total shareholders equity (j)  |  |  |  | 23,240     |  |  | (17,799)   |  |  | 13,195   |  | 
|Total capital (k=i+j)           |  |  |  | 23,240     |  |  | (17,799)   |  |  | 13,195   |  |
1

Monica Broussard

From: ecf_help@ca11.uscourts.gov

Sent: Friday, December 8, 2023 2:20 PM

To: FLNDdb_efile Appeals

Subject: 23-13670-J Robert Smith v. Jay Odom, et al "Clerk Order Filed Granted by Supervisor/Clerk Adopt 

Motion or Response" (3:20-cv-03678-MCR-ZCB)

***NOTE TO PUBLIC ACCESS USERS*** Judicial Conference of the United States policy permits attorneys of record and

parties in a case (including pro se litigants) to receive one free electronic copy of all documents filed electronically, if

receipt is required by law or directed by the filer. PACER access fees apply to all other users. To avoid later charges,

download a copy of each document during this first viewing.

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Notice of Docket Activity

The following transaction was filed on 12/08/2023  

Case Name: Robert Smith v. Jay Odom, et al

Case Number:   23‐13670

Docket Text:

ORDER: Motion to adopt motions or responses filed by Appellee Jay Odom is GRANTED by clerk [17]. is GRANTED.

Notice will be electronically mailed to:

Florida Attorney General Service

Elizabeth Billhimer

Clerk ‐ Northern District of Florida, Clerk of Court

Alfred Benjamin Gordon

Lynn M. Hoshihara

Nathaniel H. Hunt

Peter J. Kirsch

Ms. Kerry A. Parsons

Barry Richard

Michael J. Schofield

Carly J. Schrader

Matthew Shaud

Gregory Thomas Stewart

U.S. Attorney Service ‐ Northern District of Florida

Sarah Wilbanks

Notice sent via US Mail to:

Case 3:20-cv-03678-MCR-ZCB Document 88 Filed 12/08/23 Page 1 of 2
2

Amelia Hallenberg Beard

Moorhead Law Group ‐ Santa Rose Beach, FL

6757 US HWY 98 STE 102

SANTA ROSA BEACH, FL 32459  

Anne Izzo

Keefe Anchors & Gordon, PA

2113 LEWIS TURNER BLVD STE 100

FORT WALTON BCH, FL 32547‐6711  

Case 3:20-cv-03678-MCR-ZCB Document 88 Filed 12/08/23 Page 2 of 2
§ 247.3 Administering agencies. ( a ) *What agencies are responsible for administering CSFP?* CSFP is administered at the Federal level by the Department's Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), which provides commodities, assigns caseload, and allocates administrative funds to State agencies. State agencies are responsible for administering the program at the State level. The State agency may select local agencies to administer the program in local areas of the State. The State agency must provide guidance to local agencies on all aspects of program operations. The State agency may also select subdistributing agencies (e.g., another State agency, a local governmental agency, or a nonprofit organization) to distribute or store commodities, or to perform other program functions on behalf of the State agency. Local or subdistributing agencies may also select other agencies to perform specific program functions (e.g., food distribution or storage), with the State agency's approval. Although the State agency may select other organizations to perform specific activities, the State agency is ultimately responsible for all aspects of program administration.
( b ) *Are there specific functions that the State agency cannot delegate to another agency?* Yes. The State agency may not delegate the performance of the following functions to another agency: ( 1 ) Establishing eligibility requirements, in accordance with the options provided to the State agency under § 247.9; or
( 2 ) Establishing a management review system and conducting reviews of local agencies, in accordance with § 247.34.
( c ) *What Federal requirements must State, subdistributing, and local agencies follow in administering CSFP?* State, subdistributing, and local agencies must administer the program in accordance with the provisions of this part, and with the provisions contained in part 250 of this chapter, unless they are inconsistent with the provisions of this part.
exv10w13



 






Exhibit 10.13




     Tommy L. Andrews, John B. (Jack) Benton, Kathleen Flanagan, Rahul Gupta, Michele J. Langstaff,
Kevin L. Reager and Clyde L. Thomas have entered into Change in Control Agreements that are
substantially identical in all respects to the agreement with Paul F. Walsh that was filed as
Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2002.



     Steven F. Coleman has entered into a Change in Control Agreement that, as amended, is
substantially identical in all material respects to the Agreement and amendment thereto filed as
Exhibits 10.29 and 10.30, respectively, to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2000.
98-1935.

#### Denham v. New Carlisle.

Clark App. No. 98CA19. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue stated at page 4 of the court of appeals’ Decision and Entry filed August 26,1998:

> “Having determined that our May 22, 1998 decision in the present case conflicts with *Eiland {v. Coldwell Banker Hunter Realty*(Aug. 14, 1997), Cuyahoga App. No. 71369, unreported], *supra,*we hereby grant appellant’s motion requesting certification and certify the following issue to the Ohio Supreme Court:

> “ ‘When a party purports to dismiss, voluntarily and without prejudice, less than all of the claims in the action, and all of the remaining claims have been adjudicated, are the orders adjudicating the remaining claims final orders that may be reviewed on appeal?’ ”

Moyer, C.J., Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SS.1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of IR BioSciences Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John
Fermanis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




IR
      BIOSCIENCES HOLDINGS, INC.Date: March
      31, 2009
            By:
            /s/ John N.
      FermanisJohn
      N. FermanisChief
      Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, an other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**Theundersigned officer of **Standard Aero Holdings, Inc.**herebycertifies pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to suchofficer’s knowledge that: 1. the Amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Standard AeroHoldings, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of Standard Aero Holdings, Inc.     Date:May 12, 2006           By: /s/ Bradley Bertouille      Name: Bradley Bertouille  Title: Chief Financial Officer     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether madebefore or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 31.2              CERTIFICATION

I, Joseph M. Harary, the President, Chief Operating Officer,
Treasurer and Chief Accounting Officer of Research Frontiers
Incorporated ("RFI" or the "registrant") certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of RFI;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.

Dated: March 12, 2004    /s/ Joseph M. Harary
                         Joseph M. Harary
                         President, Treasurer, Principal
                         Accounting Officer
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**








**Certification
      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**As
      Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Maidenform Brands, Inc.
      (the “Company”) for the three month period ended October 1, 2005, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Thomas J. Ward, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
      Thomas J. Ward


Thomas
      J.
      Ward


Chief
      Executive Officer








November
      10, 2005




*This
      certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that
      section, nor shall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing
      under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except
      to the extent the Company specifically incorporates it by
      reference.*





-48-
2004-0783.

#### Portage Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. Akron.

Portage App. No. 2001-P-0127,156 Ohio App.3d 657, 2004-Ohio-1665. Reported at 109 Ohio St.3d 106, 2006-Ohio-954, 846 N.E.2d 478. On motion for reconsideration of the cities of Ravenna and Akron. Motions denied.

Resnick, J., dissents.
§ 240.11 Records and reports. ( a ) State agencies and distributing agencies shall maintain records and reports on the receipt and disbursement of funds made available under this part, and shall retain such records and reports for a period of three years after the end of the fiscal year to which they pertain, except that, if audit findings have not been resolved, the records shall be retained beyond the three-year period as long as required for the resolution of the issues raised by the audit.
( b ) State agencies shall establish controls and procedures which will assure that the funds made available under this part are not included in determining the State's matching requirements under § 210.6 of part 210 of this chapter.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

vs. CASE NO.5:20-cr-00010-MW-MJF-3

FREDDIE KNOWLES III,

Defendant.

 

SENTENCING MEMORANDUM

DEFENDANT FREDDIE KNOWLES III, (hereinafter “Defendant” or “Mr.

Knowles”), by and through undersigned counsel, respectfully requests this Court

impose a reasonable sentence which is sufficient but not greater than is necessary to

comply with the goals of sentencing established in Title 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). See,

generally, Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38 (2007), and Rita v. United States, 551

U.S. 38 (2007). Mr. Knowles’ case is currently scheduled for Sentencing, Thursday,

September 10,2020. The Final Presentence Investigation Report [DOC.91]wasissued

on September 1, 2020. Mr. Knowles has filed no objections to the PSR calculation of

the Sentencing Guidelines range which reflect a Base Offense Level of 31 and a

Criminal History III, for a recommended range of 135 months to 168 months

(DOC.108). However, Mr. Knowles also is subject to a minimum mandatory of ten
(10) years (120 months), on Counts I, IV and V [DOC.107]. This Court has received

and granted a motion for substantial assistance from the Government. 

Freddie Knowles III is a hard working, 58-year-old man whose life has been

riddled with behavioral lapses due to a drug-abuse problem he has never overcome.

This Court must impose a sentence which balances the need to uphold laws

which Defendant has repeatedly violated with a recommendation that treatment he

could be a changed and better man. He asks this Court to recommend or perhaps

order drug rehabilitation for him. This is his last opportunity to change the rest of his

life.

His mother was a deeply religious and respected member of her church, St.

Dominic Catholic Church in Panama City. She died with her son, Freddie, and her

grandson, Freddie Knowles IV, in prison and unable to say goodbye, or even attend

her funeral and pay their last respects. His father’s side of the family has lived in the

West Bay Area of Panama City for 140 years. He is married to Pam and she supports

his resolve to change his life.

This is his first federal conviction and hopefully his last conviction. He

provided timely cooperation, accepted full responsibility for his criminal actions and

always is a working man. He is seeking a sentence long enough to provide him with

2
meaningful drug treatment, but short enough to give him a new start for the remainder

of his life.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on September 4, 2020, the foregoing Sentencing

Memorandum was electronically filed using the CM/ECF System which will send

Notice of Electronic Filing to Assistant United States Attorney Michelle K. Spaven

and there are no other ECF participants.

Respectfully submitted,

/s Gary Lee Printy 

GARY LEE PRINTY

FL BAR ID NO. 363014

1804 Miccosukee Commons Dr., Ste. 200

Tallahassee, Florida 32308-5471

Telephone: (850) 877-7299

FAX: (850) 877-2211

Email: attygaryprinty@gmail.com

Attorney for Defendant,

FREDDIE KNOWLES III

Copy furnished to:

Laura M. Laird, U.S. Probation Officer

3