alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 218 (Friday, November 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69458-69459]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28431]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Office of Justice Programs

[OJP (NIJ) Docket No. 1526]


Notice of Draft NIJ Law Enforcement Duty Holster Selection and 
Application Guide

AGENCY: National Institute of Justice.

ACTION: Notice of Draft NIJ Law Enforcement Duty Holster Selection and 
Application Guide.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In an effort to obtain comments from interested parties, the

[[Page 69459]]

U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National 
Institute of Justice (NIJ) will make available to the general public 
the draft ``NIJ Law Enforcement Duty Holster Selection and Application 
Guide.'' The opportunity to provide comments on this document is open 
to industry technical representatives, law enforcement agencies and 
organizations, research, development and scientific communities, and 
all other stakeholders and interested parties. Those individuals 
wishing to obtain and provide comments on the draft document under 
consideration are directed to the following Web site: http://www.justnet.org.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 13, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vanessa Castellanos, by telephone at 
202-514-5272 [Note: This is not a toll-free telephone number], or by e-
mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3e485f505b4d4d5f105d5f4d4a5b52525f50514d7e4b4d5a515410595148"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3f495e515a4c4c5e115c5e4c4b5a53535e51504c7f4a4c5b505511585049">[email protected]</span></a>.

John H. Laub,
Director, National Institute of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2010-28431 Filed 11-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 25.501 Governments.

If more than one State or local government seeks to nominate an area under this part, any reference to or requirement of this part shall apply to all such governments.
#### §§ 25.406-25.499 [Reserved]
##### 



Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    to my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ William N. FryWilliam N. FryPresident and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 15, 2005/s/ Jeffrey L. GreggJeffrey L. GreggExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial OfficerNovember 15, 2005
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 136732 Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices JOHN JOSEPH SHULICK,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 136732 

 COA: 285128 

Ingham CC: 07-001677-AA

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 5, 2008 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0915 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 22, 2008 

 Clerk
SeriesType Notes

Baseline I - Non-Condensing

Baseline II - Non-Condensing

Baseline III - Non-Condensing

Two-Stage (PSC) - Non-Condensing

Two-Stage (ECM) - Non-Condensing

Baseline I - Condensing

Baseline II - Condensing

Baseline III - Condensing

Two-Stage (PSC) - Condensing

Two-Stage (ECM) - Condensing

Baseline I - Weatherized

Baseline II - Weatherized

Baseline III - Weatherized

Two-Stage (PSC) - Weatherized

Two-Stage (ECM) - Weatherized

Manufactured Home - Non-Condensing

Manufactured Home - Condensing

Modulating (ECM) - Condensing

Packaged Unit (Gas Heat/Electric 

Cooling)
#### § 1c.119 Research undertaken without the intention of involving human subjects.

Except for research waived under § 1c.101(i) or exempted under § 1c.104, in the event research is undertaken without the intention of involving human subjects, but it is later proposed to involve human subjects in the research, the research shall first be reviewed and approved by an IRB, as provided in this policy, a certification submitted by the institution to the Federal department or agency component supporting the research, and final approval given to the proposed change by the Federal department or agency component.
| **Catalog of Training**
                     New Course   College Credit Course    Correspondence Course

1.**Registration**

2.**Self-Study Courses, CD-ROMS, Web-Based Courses**

3.                  **New                  Employee Orientation**
Aquatic ResourcesInterpersonal SkillsBiodiversityInterpretationBiotelemetryIntroduction/US Fish & Wildlife Service ProgramsBudgetingLand AcquisitionChangeLawCommunications/Speaking/WritingLaw EnforcementComputer TechnologyLeadershipCongressMappingConsensus/Negotiations/ConflictMediaConservation BiologyNEPAConservation LeadershipOrientationContaminantsPartnershipsCultural ResourcesPermitsDistance LearningPlanningDiversityProblem SolvingEcological ServicesPrograms, U.S. Fish & Wildlife ServiceEcosystem ConservationRealtyEducation/OutreachRefuge ManagementEndangered SpeciesRestorationEnvironmentRights-of-WayEnvironmental EducationSafetyFederal AidSecretarial/Clerical/AdminstrativeFinancial SkillsStatisticsFisheries ManagementSupervision, Management and LeadershipFish CultureTeam BuildingFish HealthTraining/Instruction/Facilitation/Presentation SkillsFisheries TechniquesVegetationGeographic Information Systems (GIS)Waste ManagementGlobal Positioning Systems (GPS)Water RightsHabitat ConservationWater QualityHabitat EvaluationWetlandsHazardous MaterialsWilderness ManagementHuman Resources ManagementWildlifeInternetInvasive SpeciesMotorboat Operator and Instructor courses  |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

- Return to Top of page    - NCTC Home Page
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

March 24, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00078

- CV

IN RE HENRY J. LIMITED PARTNERSHIP , Relator

Original Proceeding 1

ORDER

The petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED on March 24, 2021

.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 24th day of March, 2021

.

_____________________________ Michael A. Cruz

, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 15945 , styled Permian Highway Pipeline, LLC v. Henry J. Limited

Partnership and Central Texas Electric Cooperative, Inc. , pending in the 216th Judicial District Court

, Gillespie

County, Texas, the Honorable Albert D. Pattillo, III presiding.
#### § 2500.108 Term of award.

The award term will be defined in the OAO award agreement, and can be later amended upon approval of OAO.
Editorial Note on Part 1980
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1980 appear at 80 FR 9905, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1980.1204 Eligibility. Programs eligible to be considered for smart utility and broadband service authority include RD programs under the Rural Electrification Act and the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act. Programs included, but not limited to, are as follows: ( a ) 7 CFR part 1710—General and Pre-Loan Policies and Procedures Common to Electric Loans and Guarantees;
( b ) 7 CFR part 1779—Water and Waste Disposal Programs Guaranteed Loans;
( c ) 7 CFR part 1780—Water and Waste Loans and Grants;
( d ) 7 CFR part 1783—Revolving Funds for Financing Water and Wastewater Projects (Revolving Fund Program);
( e ) 7 CFR part 1942, subpart A—Community Facility Loans;
( f ) 7 CFR part 3575, subpart A—Community Programs Guaranteed Loans;
( g ) 7 CFR part 3560—Direct Multi-Family Housing Loans and Grants;
( h ) 7 CFR part 3565—Guaranteed Rural Rental Housing Program;
( i ) 7 CFR part 3570, subpart B—Community Facilities Grant Program;
( j ) 7 CFR part 4274, subpart D—Intermediary Relending Program (IRP);
( k ) 7 CFR part 4279, subpart B—Business and Industry Loans;
( l ) 7 CFR part 4279, subpart C—Biorefinery, Renewable Chemical and Biobased Product Manufacturing Assistance Loans;
( m ) 7 CFR, part 4280, subpart A—Rural Economic Development Loan and Grant Programs;
( n ) 7 CFR part 4280, subpart B—Rural Energy for American Program; and
( o ) 7 CFR part 4280, subpart E—Rural Business Development Grants.
exv10w42



 






EXHIBIT 10.42




2005 Director Compensation




	 	 	 	 	 
	Annual Retainer:
	 	$	20,000	 
	In-Person Board of Director Meetings:
	 	$	2,000	 
	Additional In-Person Board of Director Meetings held on the day
following an In-Person Board Meeting:
	 	$	1,000	 
	Telephonic Board of Director Meetings:
	 	$	1,000	 
	Audit Committee Meeting — Chair:
	 	$	3,000	 
	Audit
Committee Meeting — Member:
	 	$	1,000	 
	Compensation Committee Meeting — Chair:
	 	$	1,000	 
	Compensation Committee Meeting — Member:
	 	$	500
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 12


                  KENT ELECTRONICS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                          (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT RATIO)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     Fiscal years ended

                                 April 1,    April 3,    March 28,  March 29,    March 30,
                                   2000        1999        1998      1997(1)       1996
                                 --------    --------    ---------  ---------    ---------
<S>                              <C>         <C>         <C>        <C>          <C>
Earnings before income taxes     $30,043     $   294     $58,167     $45,100     $49,095

Add fixed charges                 12,492      12,009       6,647       2,363       1,857
                                 -------     -------     -------     -------     -------

Earnings as adjusted             $42,535     $12,303     $64,814     $47,463     $50,952
                                 =======     =======     =======     =======     =======



Fixed charges:

  Interest expense               $10,470     $10,495     $ 5,272     $ 1,192     $   898

  Interest portion of rental
    expense(2)                     2,022       1,514       1,375       1,171         959
                                 -------     -------     -------     -------     -------

Total fixed charges              $12,492     $12,009     $ 6,647     $ 2,363     $ 1,857
                                 =======     =======     =======     =======     =======

Ratio of earnings to fixed
    charges                         3.4x        1.0x        9.8x       20.1x       27.4x
                                 =======     =======     =======     =======     =======
</TABLE>


(1)  Includes non-recurring merger and integration charges of $5.5 million,
     pre-tax, in fiscal year 1997. Exclusive of such charges, the ratio of
     earnings to fixed charges for fiscal year 1997 was 22.4.

(2)  The interest factor of rental expense is estimated at one-third of total
     rental expense, which the Company believes to be a reasonable
     approximation.
Editorial Note on Part 1942
Editorial Notes: Nomenclature changes to part 1942 appear at 80 FR 9878, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1942.7 Loan closing. Loans will be closed in accordance with the closing instructions issued by the OGC and § 1942.17(o) of this subpart and as soon as possible after receiving the check. ( a ) *Authority to execute, file, and record legal instruments.* Area Office employees are authorized to execute and file or record any legal instruments necessary to obtain or preserve security for loans.
( b ) *Preparation of mortgages.* Unless otherwise required by State law or unless an exception is approved by the State Director with advice of the OGC, only one mortgage will be taken even though the indebtedness is to be evidenced by more than one instrument.
( c ) *Source of funds for insured loans.* All loans will be made from the Rural Development Insurance Fund (RDIF).
( d ) *Unused funds.* Obligated funds planned for project development which remain after all authorized costs have been provided for will be disposed of in accordance with § 1942.17(p)(6) of this subpart.
( e ) *Loan disbursements.* Whenever a loan disbursement is received, lost, or destroyed, the Rural Development Manager will take appropriate actions outlined in Rural Development Instruction 2018-D.
( f ) *Supervised bank accounts.* Supervised bank accounts will be handled under subpart A of part 1902 of this chapter.
[50 FR 7296, Feb. 22, 1985, as amended at 53 FR 6787, Mar. 3, 1988; 59 FR 54788, Nov. 2, 1994; 68 FR 61331, Oct. 28, 2003; 70 FR 19253, Apr. 13, 2005]
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 221 (Wednesday, November 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70226-70227]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28913]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

 [Project No. 3041-004]


Mackay Bar Corporation; Notice of Authorization for Continued 
Project Operation

November 9, 2010.
    On April 28, 2008 the Mackay Bar Corporation, licensee for the 
Hettinger Hydroelectric Project, filed an Application to Surrender its 
License as

[[Page 70227]]

well as a Conduit Exemption Application pursuant to the Federal Power 
Act (FPA) and the Commission's regulations thereunder. The Hettinger 
Hydroelectric Project is located on an irrigation system in Idaho 
County, Idaho.
    The license for Project No. 3041 was issued for a period ending 
October 31, 2010. Section 15(a)(1) of the FPA, 16 U.S.C. 808(a)(1), 
requires the Commission, at the expiration of a license term, to issue 
from year-to-year an annual license to the then licensee under the 
terms and conditions of the prior license until a new license is 
issued, or the project is otherwise disposed of as provided in section 
15 or any other applicable section of the FPA. If the project's prior 
license waived the applicability of section 15 of the FPA, then, based 
on section 9(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 USC 558(c), and 
as set forth at 18 CFR 16.21(a), if the licensee of such project has 
filed an application for a subsequent license, the licensee may 
continue to operate the project in accordance with the terms and 
conditions of the license after the minor or minor part license 
expires, until the Commission acts on its application. If the licensee 
of such a project has not filed an application for a subsequent 
license, then it may be required, pursuant to 18 CFR 16.21(b), to 
continue project operations until the Commission issues someone else a 
license for the project or otherwise orders disposition of the project.
    If the project is subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that an annual license for Project No. 3041 is issued to 
the Mackay Bar Corporation for a period effective November 1, 2010 
through October 31, 2011, or until the issuance of a new license for 
the project or other disposition under the FPA, whichever comes first. 
If issuance of a new license (or other disposition) does not take place 
on or before October 31, 2011, notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 
18 CFR 16.18(c), an annual license under section 15(a)(1) of the FPA is 
renewed automatically without further order or notice by the 
Commission, unless the Commission orders otherwise.
    If the project is not subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that Mackay Bar Corporation, is authorized to continue 
operation of the Hettinger Hydroelectric Project, until such time as 
the Commission acts on its application for a subsequent license.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-28913 Filed 11-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
{"@context": "https://wayback.archive-it.org/16698/20210520143755/http://schema.org", "@type": "BreadcrumbList", "itemListElement": [{"@type": "ListItem", "position": 1, "item": {"@id": "https:\/\/wayback.archive-it.org\/16698\/20210520143755\/http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/usnationalarchives", "name": "US National Archives"}}]}

















© 2021 Google LLC
135 So.2d 472

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Hypolite P. SONNIER. STATE of Louisiana v. Irvin PIERRE. STATE of Louisiana v. Oliver SIMMONS.

Nos. 45787-45789.

Dec. 11, 1961.

*221Jack P. F. Gremillion, Atty. Gen., Leander H. Perez, Jr., Dist. Atty., Ellis C. Irwin, Harry H. Howard, New Orleans, for relator.

Hypolite P. Sonnier, in pro. per. (No. 45787).

Irvin Pierre, in pro. per. (No. 45788).

Oliver Simmons, in pro. per. (No. 45789).

FOURNET, Chief Justice.

The three above entitled cases, together with their companion case, State v. Bellande,1 were previously before us for consideration on appeals taken by the state through its Department of Wild Life and Fisheries Commission, in all of which it was contended the trial judge erred in ordering nets seized and forfeited returned to the respective owners after their convictions and sentences on pleas of guilty to the charge of trawling in inside waters, in violation of R.S. 56:497. We set aside this order in the Bellande case but dismissed the appeals in the other three cases (now under consideration) because of lack of appellate jurisdiction.2 A writ of certiorari was subsequently granted in each so that we might review the trial judge’s refusal to grant the state’s motion requesting him to amend his prior judgments in order that the holdings in these cases would conform with our decision in the Bellande case.

Clearly our learned brother below was in error in refusing to amend his judgments by deleting therefrom that portion ordering the return of the seized nets to their owners, for, as pointed out in the Bellande case, under the provisions of the penalty clause of the statute involved (R.S. 56:507) the right to dispose of such forfeited equipment was vested in the Wild Life and Fisheries Commission.

For the reasons assigned, the order of the trial judge in each of the above entitled cases is reversed and it is now ordered, adjudged and decreed that his order in the respective cases to return the trawl nets forfeited to their owners is annulled and set aside.

1

. 241 La. 213, 128 So.2d 14, 15.

2

. State v. Sonnier, 241 La. 216, 128 So.2d 15: State v. Simmons. 241 La. 218, 128 So.2d 16; State v. Pierre, 241 La. 220, 128 So.2d 16.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2057 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2057

To remove from the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System the 
           areas comprising Bay County Unit P-31P in Florida.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 20, 2013

 Mr. Southerland introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To remove from the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System the 
           areas comprising Bay County Unit P-31P in Florida.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVAL FROM JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM 
              OF AREAS COMPRISING BAY COUNTY UNIT P-31P, FLORIDA.

    The areas comprising John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources 
System Bay County Unit P-31P in Florida immediately before the 
enactment of this Act are not part of such system, and maps relating to 
such unit are hereby removed from the maps referred to in section 4(a) 
of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)).
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

 PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 3:94cr3135/LAC

WILLIE EARL SIMMONS

___________________________________________/

ORDER

THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon a document filed by Defendant, Willie

Earl Simmons. The document (doc. 583) is entitled “Motion for Verification of Sentence”.

The document makes no sense in the context of this case. To the extent Defendant intended

the document to be a motion requesting relief from the Court, the motion is denied.

SO ORDERED this 19th day of April, 2006.

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

 Senior United States District Judge

Case 3:94-cr-03135-LC Document 584-2 Filed 04/19/06 Page 1 of 1