P. 1


# OAR Box 1669 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# j^j4) W-E-6 Docket Number: 

# A-98-1 3

Printed 9/23/20089:36:49AM

Sheet 74 of 110K e g 

### A 9 8 1 3 U-E- £ MEMORANDU

M

fli TO : Stev e Shed d U.S . EPA/OAQPS/ESD/WCPG ES D Projec t

No . 96/0 5 FROM : GregLaFlam^ '

Pacifi c Environmenta

l Services , Inc . (PES ) DATE : Ma

y 19,199 8 SUBJECT : March 24,199 8 SecondRoundtabl e Meetin g o n th e P-MAC T fo r Organi c Liquid s Distributio n (non-Gasoline ) Facilitie s I . Purpos e Th e purpos e o f

thi s meetin g wa s t o brin g together th e projec t

Wor k Team , includin g th e EP A and it s contractor , to discus s th e draf t presumptiv e MACT (P-MACT ) documen t and , a s tim e permitted , th e industr

y survey tha

t wa s goin g t o b e sen

t t o organi c liquid s distributio n (OLD ) facilities . Thi s wor

k i s i n suppor

t of th e development

o f nationa l emissio n standard s fo

r hazardou s air

pollutant s (NESHAP) fo

r th e Organi c Liquid s Distributio n (non-Gasoline ) sourc e category . II . Locatio n an d Dat

e U.S . Environmenta

l Protectio n Agency EPA/NC Mutua

l Building , Roo

m83 8 Durham , Nort

h Carolin a Marc h 24,1998,9:0 0 a

mt o noo n III . Participant

s \ I n perso n Te d Cromwell , Chemica

l Manufacturers Associatio n Bernd Haneke , Pacifi c Environmenta l Services , Inc . (PES ) Clif f Harvison , Nationa

l Tan k Truc k Carrier s Ja y Helms , PE S Charle s Hester , PE S Gre g LaFlam , PE S Norma n Morrow , Exxo n Chemica l America s Stev e Shedd , EP

A Larr y Sorells , EP

A Don Wang , Unio n Carbide Gar y Wilson , Maratho n Oi l Compan yP. 3

Mem o - 2n d Roundtabl e Ma y 19,199 8 Pag e 2 Phone-i n Joe l Fazzio , Internationa

l Matex Tan

k Terminal s To mHmiel , BAS F Corporatio n Jorda n Jacobsen , Alyesk

aPipelin e Servic e Compan y Pau l Jann , Dupont Bria n Neville , Independen

t Liqui dTerminal s Associatio n Kari n Ritter , America

n PetroleumInstitut

e Ric k Wright , Ashlan d Chemica

l Th e attendanc e sheet

filled out a t th e meetin g i s include da s Attachmen t 1 . IV . Discussio n A . Presumptiv e MAC

T EP A Introductio n Afte r th e participant s introduce dthemselves , Stev e Shed dbega n th e discussio n b y reviewin g th e agend afo

r th e meetin g (se e Attachmen t 2) . He sai dtha

t th e discussio n o f

issue s and comment s o n th e P-MACT wouldoccu r durin g th e EPA' s andPES' s presentatio n o f th e P

MAC T results . Also , h e state d tha t "next steps " i n th e project , atopi c that wa s no t liste d o n th e agenda , woul d b e discusse d a t th e endo f th e meeting . Gre g LaFla

mreferre d to th e draf

t P-MACT documen

t tha t wa s E-maile d t o th e Wor

k Tea mo n Marc h 19,1998 , and apologize dfo r th e shor t revie w time . H e the n proceede dt o revie w th e determination s presente din th e document , first coverin g affecte

dsource s and the n th e level s o f

contro l currently i n plac e a t OL D facilities . Affected Source s Mr . LaFla mreviewe d th e fou

r basi c categorie s o f

affecte dsource s under

consideratio n b y th e EP A projec t team , a s summarizedi n Sectio n 1.3. 1 of th e draf t P-MAC T document

(se e Attachment

3) . H e pointe d out

tha t thes e categorie s ar

e simila r t o th e sourc e type s discusse d a t th e first Roundtabl e i n Januar

y 1998 . Norma

n Morro w mentione dtha

t fo r pipelin e facilities , th e conditio n "afte

r th e point of custod y transfer " applie s only to petroleumfacilitie s handlin g crude oi l o r natura l ga s liquids . He pointe dou t tha t chemical s ar

e als o handle db y pipeline , s o th e descriptio n o f

pipelin e facilit

y shouldb e broadened . Clif f Harviso n aske d whethe

r th e EP A ha dlooke da t carg o tank

cleanin g operation s a s a n emissio n source . H e sai d that , durin g thes e operations , vapor s ar e typicall y expelle dt o th e atmosphere . However , such cleaning i s usually performe da t separat e (non-distribution )


### 5 LP. 4

Mem o - 2nd Roundtabl e Ma y 19,199 8 Pag e 3 facilities . Mr . Shedd responde d tha t w e hav e no t

considere dthi s emissio n source , bu t wil l investigate whethe

r i t shoul d b e par

t o f thi s sourc e category . However , he sai di t i s doubtful tha t th e rul e woul d contro l off-sit e facilities . Gar y Wilso n aske d whethe

r i t wa s afai r assumptio n t o sa

y tha t thi s rul e wil l no t

cover an y sourc e tha

t i s covere d by anothe

r Federa l MACT rule . Mr . Shed

dstate dtha

t thi s woul d b e tru e fo r regulate d operations , but

som e facilitie s ma

y b e onl y partiall y covere dunde

r other MACT rules . For

thes e facilitie s (refinerie s o r chemica l plants) , w e wouldno t

cove r an y emissio n sourc e alread

y regulated , o

r tha t wa s addresse dandth e MACT decisio n wa s "n o control" , but

w e wil l look

a t an y sourc e withi n thos e facilitie s tha t wa s no t addresse db y other MACT rules , s o lon g a s it

i s associate dwit

h liqui ddistributio n operations . Mr . Shedd pointe d ou t tha t som e distributio n storag e tank s a t productio n facilitie s appea r to hav e been lef

t out o f coverag e by th e Hazardou s Organi c NESHA P (HON ) andth e Refiner

y NESHAP , and w e wil l collec t informatio n o n thos e tank s t o determine MACT . Also , loadin g rack s transferrin g non gasolin e liquid s a

t refinerie s wer

e lef t ou t o f th e MAC T floo

r determination , andw e als o wil l collec t informatio n on thes e source s t o determine MACT . For

facilitie s controlle dby NESHAP rule s unde r 4 0 CF RPar t 6 1 (non-MACT) , decision s on appropriat e contro l level s wil l hav e t o b e mad e accordin g to th e MACT statutes . Curren t Level s o f Contro l Mr . LaFla mthe n bega

n areview of

th e sectio n o f

th e P-MAC T documen

t o n current level s o f control , a s summarize d in Table 1- 1 o f Attachmen

t 2 . Mr . Morrow commente d tha t th e idea l metho d o f

determinin g P-MACT level s i s t o analyz e th e numbe

r o f source s achievin g variou s level s of

control . The draf

t document , on th e othe

r hand , relie s on th e numbe

r of Stat e o r loca l rule s requirin g differen

t contro l levels . Th

e EP A shoul dexplain their

methodolog y mor e completely , or

d o som e typ e o f weighting proces s base don th e numbe r of source s likely to b e in eac h Stat

e involve d in th e P-MACT levels . Mr . Morro w saidtha t thi s weightin g procedur e i s particularly importan

t fo r P-MACT fo

r fixed roo f tank s (FRTs ) storin g lo w vapor pressur e liquid s an

d fo r th e 2 1 mg/lite

r emissio n limit

shown fo r existin g sourc e transfe

r operations . The reaso n i s tha t it seem s t o b e margina

l whethe r thes e tw o P-MAC T determination s reflec t

tru e floo r levels . For

thes e tw o P-MAC T levels , th e appropriat e vapor pressur e an d facilit y throughput

cutoff s shoul db e addedto reflect th e applicabilit

y of th e rule s used t o arriv e a

t thos e levels . Mr . Shed

dsai dtha t w e woul drevie w al

l of th e rule s in th e P

MACT to mak

e sur e tha t th e correct

cutoff s ar e reflected . H e als o pointedout that , in th e Miscellaneou s Organi c NESHA P (MON ) development , P-MACT i s going t o b e issue d afte

r th e MACT floor s ar

e determined . H

e fel t tha t th e OL D P-MAC T shoul dexplain tha t th e determination s ar

e subject t o chang e afte

r additiona l informatio n i s collecte dabou t OL D industr y practices . On e participant

pointe d ou

t tha t th e ter m"pressur

e tank " (shown unde

r th e FRT , hig hP. 5

Mem o - 2nd Roundtabl e Ma y 19,199 8 Pag e 4 vapor pressur e category ) shoul d b e define dbecaus e variou s pressure s exis t withi n tank s i n differen t situations , suc h a s backpressur e fro macontro l device . Also , a n ASM E pressure vessel i s defined t o b e 1 5 ps i or above , an darefrigeratedpressure vesse l operate s a t 1 psia . Tw o participant s pointe d out tha t existin g rule s contain alowe r siz e cutof f fo r pressure vessels . Mr . Harviso n bega

n adiscussio n of

th e issu e o f

cargo tank

leakage. I n Texas , where vapo r recover y i s mandated , operator s ar e drillin g hole s o

r installin g a"cleanout

nipple " t o compl y wit h th e rule , and thi s i s creatin g asafet y hazar dbecaus e driver s mus t

mov e aroun d o n th e to p o f th e truck s and ar

e subject t o falling . He sai dtha

t mos t chemica l trailer s ar

e th e stainles s steel , "clea

n bore " (uncompartmented) typ e (designate dMC307 or MC312) , and ver

y fe w ar e equippe d fo

r botto mloadin g o

r vapo r recovery . Th e DO T annua l lea k testin g requirement s ar

e containe d i n Titl e 49 , Par t 18 0 of th e CFR . The EPA' s Metho d2 7 (vapo r tightnes s o f

carg o tanks ) i s considere db y DOT t o b e a n acceptabl e substitut

e t o it s own tes t methods , and i n fact

i s th e metho dof

testin g i n common use . H e als o note dtha t they conside

r th e Metho d 2 7 tes t

t o b e mor e stringen t tha n th e DOT tes t

fo r detectin g vapor

leakag e that occur s durin g th e loadin g of th e tank . Mr . Shed

dsai dtha t th e Texa s vapor

recover y situatio n present s aconcer

n and wil l need t o b e addressed ; h e recommende dtha t th e issu e b e place d o n th e issue s list . However , h e sai d tha t thi s issu e shoul dno t

affec t th e P-MAC T process . Mr . Wrigh t pointe d out

that , in th e Ba

y Are a(California) , operator s als o ar e "gerr y rigging " dom

e cover s t o comply wit

h vapor recover y requirements . He als o though t tha t Texa s might

require emissio n control s o n tank

cleanings . Th e subjec t

o f th e contro l of

equipment

leaks wa s discusse dnext . Mr . Wrigh t note d tha t Ashland' s Housto n facilit

y perform s instrumen

t LDAR , an

dha s foun dtha t ver y fe w component s typicall y nee d repair . Thei r Ba y Are afacilit

y ha s about

3,000 component s and , again , ha s foun

d ver y littl e leakag e (lea

k definition s ar

e 50 0 ppm v fo r pumps , and10

0 ppm v fo r th e remainin g components) . Mr . Shed daskedwhethe

r ther e ar e an y datao n lea

k rate s fo r component s a

t distributio n facilities . Mr . Wilso n stated , andother s agreed , tha t th e distributio n component s see

mmor e lik e thos e a t agasoline distributio n termina l (which hav e lowe

r lea k rates ) tha n thos e a t arefinery . Mr . Shed

dpointe dout

tha t there ma y b e aP-MAC T fo

r equipmen t leak s a t ne w sources , s o we nee ddatato suppor t existin g an

dnew sourc e MAC T floors . I n th e cas e o f

gasolin e terminals , th e EP

A discovere dtha

t there i s only aslight differenc e (0. 2 percent) between emissio n factor s a t facilitie s performing instrumen t an d visual LDA Rprograms . In an

y case , th e industr

y need s to suppor

t their assumptio n abou

t OL D i equipmen t lea k rate s wit h data . i \ j Pau l Jann commente d o n th e P-MACT level s show n fo r wastewater

treatment and \ control. H e sai d tha t th e HO N specifie s cutoff

s of HA P concentratio n andtota

l flow rat e that « trigge

r th e contro l requirement s in th e rule , an dthes e shoul db e addedt

o th e P-MAC T fo

r thi s emissio n source . Mr . Shed d sai dtha t w e woul drevie w th e HO

N i n mor e dept h andadd th e appropriat e applicabilit

y criteri ato thi s section . Anothe r participant

note dtha t wastewate

r 

# 4 -P. 6

Mem o - 2nd Roundtabl e Ma y 19,199 8 Pag e 5 shoul d b e defined to clarif

y tha t it i s no t mean t to include stormwater . For blending and

packaging operations , Mr . Wrigh t pointe dout

tha t Ashlan d Chemica l ha s 6 0 t o 7 0 facilitie s i n th e U.S. , andessentially all of the mar e are asources . O f thre e majo r sources , on e i s bein g rebuilt s o tha t i t wil l emit a t les s tha n th e majo r sourc e level , and anothe

r i s amajo r sourc e fo r VOC , bu t no t fo r HAP . Th e Ashlandfacilitie s fill container s between 1,00

0 and 8,500 gallon s i n capacity . Thes e container s have pressure-vacuumvents , an d primaril y botto mfillin g i s used . Th e EP A an dPE S sai dtha

t the y realize dtha

t mos t o f thes e operation s ar

e likel y t o b e are asources , andthey ar e workin g wit

h th e Nationa

l Associatio n o f

Chemica l Distributor s (NACD ) t o suppor t thi s assumptio n an

dto conside

r thi s in th e industr

y survey . However , th e EP A i s stil l intereste di

n thi s typ e o

f sourc e if i t i s collocate d a

t adistributio n plant

site . Do n Wang aske d ho w th e Consolidate dAi r Rul e (abou

t to b e proposed) woul d affec t thi s rulemaking . Mr . Shed d wa s not abl e to responddirectly , but saidtha t w e woul dconsider th e CA Rlanguag e i n th e OL

D rule' s proposa

l anddiscus s an

y impact s o f

th e rul e wit

h Ric k Colyer , th e EP

A lea d o n th e CA

Rproject . In addition , arevie w wil l b e mad e o f al l applicabl e rul e languag e prio r

t o proposa

l s o adecisio n ca

n b e mad e on th e mos t

appropriat

e languag e fo

r thi s industry . Nex t Step s Mr . Shedd sai d tha

t th e project

tea mwoul drevie w th e comment s mad e a t th e meetin g and revis e th e P-MAC T documen t t o reflect th e comments . Afte

r th e change s are made , th e revise d Tabl e 1- 1 and Sectio n 5 detailin g th e P-MACT level s will again b e sen t out to th e Wor

k Tea mfo r review . Kari n Ritte

r sai dtha t AP I ha dno t ha da n adequat e chanc e t o revie w th e P

MACT and collec t

comment s fro

mit s membe

r companies . Sh

e saidtha t they woul dsuppl y written comments , and suggeste d aphone cal l to discus s their concern s in th e nex

t wee k o r two . Sh e als o aske d whethe

r athir d Roundtabl e meetin g fo

r P-MACT was planned , andMr . Shed d sai d tha t thi s wa s no t

likely becaus e n o majo

r problem s ha

dbee n foun din th e P-MAC T proces s tha t need furthe

r discussion , an

dth e EP A di dno t se e th e nee dfo

r a n additiona

l meeting . B . Industr y Surve y Th e statu s o f

th e planne dindustr

y survey , o

r information collectio n reques t (ICR) , wa s discussed . I

n particular , th e adequacy o f th e mailin g lis t

wa s addressed . Mr . Morro w fel t tha t th e smalle r companie s shoul d b e represente do n th e mailin g list . Bern dHanek e state d tha

t w e ar e plannin g t o ad

d severa l NAC D membe

r companies , man

y of which ma y b e smaller

tha n th e chemica l manufacturers . Bria

n Nevill e state dtha

t th e ILT A membe r representatio n o n th e mailin g lis t

appeare d to b e adequate . Ms . Ritte r sai dtha t th e lis t ha dbee n sen t to AP I members , bu t

littl e commen

t ha dbeen received .

# $ rP. 7

Mem o - 2nd Roundtabl e Ma y 19,199 8 Pag e 6 Th e instruction s that wil l accompan

y th e surve

y wer e discusse dnext . Mr . Morro w pointe d out

that , i n th e HON , "rundown " tankag e i s covered , whil e "product " tankag e i s not . H e suggeste d tha

t respondent s shoul dno t

hav e t o repor

t o n an y source s tha

t ar e alread y covere d by th e HON . Further , h e fel t tha t th e surve y shoul das k

ho w man y of th e facility' s tank s ar

e alread y covere d under

th e 4 0 CF Rpar t 6 1 benzene rules , subpart s Y an dBB . Mr . Shedd responde d tha

t thes e rule s wer

e no t base do n MACT , ands o such tank s woul dhav e t o b e include d i n th e surve

y and th e subsequen

t analysis . On

e participant

aske dwhethe

r th e previously discusse d emission s o r liqui dpropert

y cutoff s tha t determin e who mus t

respon d had bee n changed sinc e ou

r las t Tea mmeeting (Februar

y 12,1998) . Mr . Shed

dresponde d tha

t only facilitie s wit

h actua l annua l emission s of

5 tp y o r greate r o f asingl e HAP , or

12. 5 tp y or

greate r o f acombinatio n o f

HA P wil l hav e to respond . Also , liquid s to b e surveye dmus t contai n HAP o f a t leas t 1,00 0 ppm w and hav e atotal vapor

pressur e of a t leas t 0. 1 psia . The survey questio n relate dt o "percen t utilization " of

th e facilit y wa s als o discussed . Larr y Sorell s describe d th e basi s fo r the question ; however , severa l participant s appeare d confused a s t o ho w thi s determinatio n shoul db e made fo r afacility . Mr . Sorell s sai d h e woul d expand th e current

languag e i n th e instruction s s o tha t respondent s woul dunderstan dth e us e of th e dat as o the y coul d respon d appropriately . Th e questio n wa s raise d about apossibl e workshop (probably i n mid-May ) to answe r question s tha

t companie s ma

y hav e on filling ou

t th e ICR , an

dth e meetin g participant s were unsur e a s to th e utilit

y o f such aworkshop . Mr . Shed dsai dtha t th e projec t

tea mwoul d pursu e thi s ide awit

h API and ILTA to see whethe r the y woul db e intereste din coordinatin g a workshop , sinc e API had suggeste dsuc h aworkshop a

t th e first Roundtabl e meeting . Next Step s Mr . Shedd sai d tha

t arevise ddraf

t o f th e IC Rinstruction s wa s almos t ready , an d woul d b e sen t out t o th e Tea mnex t wee k fo r aquick revie w befor

e finalization . Th e surve

y i s planne d t o b e sen t ou t t o companie s i

n th e nex t fe w weeks (pape

r copies) , anda

n electroni c versio n wil l als o b e place d o n th e EPA' s Technolog y Transfe r Networ k (website) .

&P. 8

Attachment1 - Attendance Sheet

" ^P. 9



# Z^s~Ju ^

TW^ k

\%-si^-Mh a

/ . 

### 2
. 2.
s Y L. 7
. o . 

### <?
. £ >
. / / . /2- , /J? , 

### ' y
. / ^ . / . 

### 2
. 2
. 

### H • & -
* . 

### 0
. 8
. V f i . 

### $:^/ \

3 ^ Kj^v^ s NA-CTA-CN ) \>0>^- l/J*.*.<L 

### ZTrYi HB.M £



### ]L*-*rX ^-\a*du
~1^L(\ Crcww*
. .

^

CALL
. _ 

### ^^k

_u^^i A Ox.* ^ V_vi_W^*-C*J < (Jhi&~4. C<i,r

(?< ,*JL 

### ?P 5

FlS £P/}/0AQFS feT5 > 

### £pk j ^TTd. 

# c m A

^



### - - ^^ 4 CiKrv

^ 

# ^ r 

# & ^ i<^vsc o —A<^ ^ 'j© ^ -fc^r-^ 1 

### ® 1 s ^ \\+*s

*rf^/ vc. ^ r*e-^\« - 

# "to,
—yw~--

* ^ , cJ k 

### ^

«-.. £ 

# -i^rr r

l^rf-s ^ cs^X^r^r ^>fe_^ — £*i-r?© - 6H 7

1o4-l41- Hz.4- 

# (in ) ni~°m> Cvy W(~<?33

3 f4n)s*/'

SJ9r «l«. \ £^H \ ~°?? 2 

### fW| ) FSi*-;?£ 0 > I o * 1*\V

biM(p

<-A
. C»
.

(O'-c b - lo:^- s > 

# T^ \ 1c m ^^"^ ^

- X
^ T 

# Cfe A ^> ° ~ ^ ^ (jUr V 9 ^

" 

# IM J •H* *P.1 0

Attachment2 - Agenda

i

<= .P.1 1



### U.S . EP A - ORGANI C LIQUID S DISTRIBUTIO N RUL E

2n d ROUNDTABL E MEETING

REVIEW OF DRAFT P-MACT EPA/N C Mutual Building , 8t h Floo r Conferenc

e Room , Room #83 8 Durham , Nort

h Carolina Marc h 24,199 8 © Call-i n number : (919 ) 541-448 5



### Agend a 9:00-9:1 5 9:15-10:0 0 Introduction s

Revie w o f Meetin g Objective s andAgend a Summar y o f Draf t P-MACT Determination s

- affectedsource s -level s o f contro l U.S . EP A U.S . EPA/PE S

10:00-11:0 0 11:00-12:0 0 Discussio n o f Issue s Affectin

g P-MACT Al l Participant s Tea mComment s andSuggestion s fo r Revisin g Al l Participant s Draf t P-MAC T Documen

t 12:00-1:0 0 Discussio n o f Othe r Relate dIssue s

- draf t industr y surve y

- storag e tank s a

t productio n facilitie s

- loadin g rack s a

t refinerie s

- surve y mailin g lis t

- coverag e an daddresse s

- othe r issue s Al l Participant s

1:0 0 Meetin g Adjourn



## I OP.1 2

Attachment3 - Draf tP-MAC T Document



# nP.1 3



# PRESUMPTIV

E MAC T FO R ORGANI C LIQUID S DISTRIBUTIO N (NON-GASOLINE ) FACILITIE S

DRAF T MARC H 19,199 8

Wast e an d Chemica

l Processe s Grou p Offic e o f Air Qualit

y Plannin g an d Standards U.S . Environmenta

l Protectio n Agenc y Researc h Triangle Park

, N C


## \ 2P.U

TABL E O F CONTENT S Sectio n Pag e 1.0 Overvie w o f

th e Presumptiv e MAC T Determinatio n 1- 1 1. 1 Backgroun d 1- 1 1. 2 Availabl e Dat a1- 1 1. 3 Summar

y o f Presumptiv e MAC T 1 - 2 1.3. 1 Affected Source s 1- 2 1.3. 2 Contro l Level s fo

r P-MAC T 1-3 2. 0 Sourc e Categor

y an d AffectedSource s 2- 1 2. 1 Stand-Alone o r

Separat e Distributio n Terminal s 2- 1 2. 2 Collocate d Distributio n Facilitie s 2- 2 2. 3 Pipelin e Facilitie s 2- 2 2. 4 Compounding/Blending/Packagin g Facilitie s 2- 3 2. 5 Affected Sources/Conclusion s 2- 4 3. 0 Emissio n Source s 3- 1 3. 1 Storag e Vessel s 3- 1 3. 2 Liqui d Transfe

r Operation s 3- 2 3. 3 Leak s fromEquipment Component s 3- 2 3. 4 Wastewate

r an d Othe r Waste s 3- 2 3. 5 Blendin g and Packagin g Operation s 3- 3 4. 0 Emissio n Control s 4- 1 4. 1 Storag e Vessel s 4- 1 4. 2 Liqui d Transfe

r Operation s 4- 1 4. 3 Equipmen

t Component s 4- 1 4. 4 Wastewate

r and Othe r Waste s 4- 1 5. 0 Current

Contro l Level s 5. 1 Conclusion s o n Leve l o f Contro l 5- 1 5.1. 1 Fixe d Roo f

Storag e Tank s 5- 1 5.1. 2 Externa

l Floatin g Roo f

Tank s 5- 3 5.1. 3 Liqui d Transfe

r Operation s 5- 6 5.1. 4 Wastewate

r Treatmen t 5- 7 5.1. 5 Equipment

Leak s 5- 8



### i i 

# 1 5P.1 5

Sectio n Eag e 5. 2 Federa

l Regulation s 5- 8 5. 3 State/Loca

l Regulation s 5-1 2 6. 0 Summar

y o f Issue s and Nex t

Step s 6- 1 6. 1 Issue s i n th e NESHAP Developmen t 6- 1 6. 2 Nex t

Step s 6- 2 7. 0 Reference s 7- 1

Attachment

s Attachmen t

1 Presumptiv e MAC T fo r Organi c Liquid s Distributio n (non-Gasoline ) Facilitie s (Presentatio n Format) Attachmen t

2 Memorandum—Summar y o f State/Loca

l Rule s

i n 

# | 4 ~P.1 6



### DRAF T 3/19/9 8 1. 0 OVERVIEW OF TH E PRESUMPTIVE MAC T DETERMINATIO N 1. 1 Backgroun d Sectio n 11 2 o f

th e Clea n Ai r Ac t (th e Act) mandate s tha

t th e EP A promulgate national emissio n standard s fo

r hazardou s air

pollutant s (NESHAP ) o n atimely basis . I n respons e t o Sectio n 112(c) , th e EP A publishe d a n initial lis t

o f hazardou s air

pollutant (HAP ) sourc e categorie s i n th e Federal Registe r o n July 16,199 2 (5 7 F R31576) . Thi s lis t include dOrgani c Liquid s Distributio n (non-Gasoline ) a s on e o f th e categorie s o f

majo r source s fo

r whic h standard s were t o b e develope d andpromulgate di n th e yea r 2000 . Th e Ac t

furthe r require s that th e NESHAP fo

r eac h liste d sourc e categor

y require source s t o adop t

maximumachievabl e contro l technolog y (MACT ) t o reduc e emission s o f HAP . §112(d) . I f

th e EP A fail s t o mee t

thi s deadlin e b y more tha n 1 8 months , Sectio n 11 2 (j ) include s a"hammer " provisio n requirin g tha t operatin g permit s fo

r majo r source s contai n HA

P emissio n limitation s determine dt o b e equivalent t o MACT . Th e equivalenc y determination s are t o b e mad e o n acase-by-cas e basi s fo r individua l sources . Sectio n 112(g ) require s case-by-cas e MACT determination s fo r source s wher e n o applicabl e emissio n limitation s fo r HA P materia l hav e bee n established . Th e fina l rul e governin g Sectio n 112(g ) case-by-cas e MAC T determination s fo r constructe do r

reconstructe d source s wa s publishe d i n th e Federa l Registe r o n Decembe

r 27,199 6 (6 1 F R68384) . Thi s rul e require s case-by-cas e MAC T fo r ne w andreconstructe dmajo r source s t o b e consisten t

with "ne w sourc e MACT; " i.e. , n o les s stringen t tha n th e emissio n contro l tha

t i s achieve di n practic e b y th e bes t controlle d simila

r source , a s determine db y th e Administrator . Thi s document

present s option s fo

r presumptiv e maximumachievabl e contro l technolog y (P-MACT ) t o serv e a s aresourc e to State s that mus t mak e thes e case-by-cas e determinations . I t

als o provide s afoundatio n andblueprint fo r developin g arul e proposa l and a final NESHAP regulation . 1. 2 Availabl e Data Th e EPA projec t

tea mconsidere dsevera

l availabl e source s o f

informatio n i n preparin g thi s P-MAC T document . Thes e include dacomprehensiv e literatur e searc h an drevie w o f existin g regulations , a s wel l a s meeting s andother contact s made wit

h companie s an dtrad e organizations . I n addition , an industr y surve y ha s bee n prepare di n orde r t o collec t detaile d facility-specifi c infonnatio n o n curren t contro l practices . However , n o surve y result s ar e availabl e for

us e i n settin g P-MACT a

t thi s time . Th e projec t

tea mmad e site visit s t o thre e organi c liquid s distributio n facilitie s i n Ne w

1- 1

I <P.1 7



### DRAF T 3/19/9 8
Jerse y and Philadelphi ai n Decembe r 1997 . Sinc e th e informatio n obtaine do n thes e visit s i s bein g treate d a s confidentia l busines s information (CBI ) pendin g revie w b y th e plan t owners , detaile d informatio n fromth e visit s ha s no t been use dt o determin e P-MACT . A comprehensiv e revie w o f existin g andplanne dregulation s affecting thi s industr y wa s undertake n t o allo w conclusion s concernin g current level s o f control . Th e result s o f

thi s revie w serve d a s th e principal sourc e o f informatio n i n developin g th e P-MAC T level s summarize d i n th e next subsection . An EPA/industr

y Roundtabl e meetin g wa s hel do n Januar y 21,1998 . A secon d meeting/teleconferenc e o f

th e Wor k Tea mwa s hel do n Februar

y 12,199 8 t o discus s th e draf t industr y survey questionnaire under developmen

t withi n th e Agency . Thes e discussions , alon g wit h anumbe r o f other conversation s andwritte n communications , provide duseful informatio n t o th e projec t

teami n th e development

o f thi s documen

t a s wel l a s th e survey . A detaile d industr

y questionnair

e wil l b e sen t

t o companie s nationwid e i n th e nea r future . A s mentione d earlier , n o surve y result s wer e availabl e t o incorporate int o th e P-MAC T document . 1.3 Summar

y o f Presumptiv e MAC T 1.3.1 . Affected Source s Th e intial sourc e categor

y definitio n fo

r thi s projec t

indicate dthat

th e categor

y woul d consis t o f activitie s associate d wit

h th e storag e anddistributio n o f non-gasolin e liquid s with HA P content , at

site s that serv e a s distributio n point s fromwhic h organi c liquid s ma y b e obtaine d fo

r furthe r us e an d processing . The EP A projec t tea mha s investigate dth e type s o f facilitie s that

ma y operate withi n thi s broa

dindustr y definition . Fo r

th e P-MAC T effort , thes e facilit y type s include : 1 . Stand-alon e or

separat e distributio n terminal s 2 . Distributio n activitie s collocate dwit h petroleu mrefinerie s o r

chemica l productio n plant s 3 . Pipelin e facilitie s afte r th e poin t o f custod y transfe r (i.e. , downstrea

mo f oi l an d ga s productio n operations ) 4 . Facilitie s tha

t compound , mix , o

r blen dliquids , andma

y packag e thes e liquid s o r blends .

1- 2

I f oP.1 8



### DRAF T 3/19/9 8 1.3. 2 Contro l level s fo

r P-MAC T Sectio n 112(d) o f

th e Ac t require s that

th e emissio n standard s fo

r new sources "shal l no t b e les s stringen t

tha n th e emissio n contro l tha t

i s achieve di n practic e b y th e bes t controlle d simila r source , a s determine d b y th e Administrator. " Standard s fo r existing sources "ma

y b e les s stringent than standard s fo

r new source s i n th e sam

e categor y or subcategor

y bu t shall no t b e les s stringent , an d ma

y b e mor e stringent than ~ (A ) th e averag e emissio n limitatio n achieve db y th e bes t performin g 1 2 percent

o f th e existin g sources.. . fo

r categorie s an dsubcategorie s wit h 3 0 o r more sources , o r (B ) th e averag e emissio n limitatio n achieve db y th e bes t performin g 5 sources.. . fo r categorie s or

subcategorie s wit

h fewe r tha n 3 0 sources. " A s note d i n th e previou s subsection , dat ao n th e contro l level s i n effect a t specifi c organi c liquid s distributio n facilitie s wer

e no t availabl e fo

r makin g apresumptiv e MAC T determination . However , th e revie w o f

Federal , State , an dlocal regulation s currently i n effect fo r source s i n thi s categor y o r simila r categorie s suppor

t th e contro l level s i n effect

an dtherefor

e wa s use dfo

r selectin g P-MACT . Base d o n thi s regulator

y revie w andother

informatio n a s discusse di n Sectio n 1.2 , Tabl e 1- 1 summarize s th e preliminar y P-MAC T contro l level s fo r th e emissio n source s a

t th e affected facilitie s describe d above .

1- 3

&P.1 9



### DRAF T 3/19/9 8
TABLE 1-1 . SUMMAR

Y O F P-MAC T DETERMINATION S (Base d o n Federal , State.an d loca l ai r pollutio n rules )

Emissio n Sourc e P-MAC T Ne w Source s Existin g Source s 

# IIHMH^^HII^BHIHHH i A . Fixe d Roo f

Tanks , lo w vapo r pressur e liquid s

B . Fixe d Roo f

Tanks , hig h vapo r pressur e liquid s C . Smal l Tank s D . External Floatin g Roo f Tanks (General )

E . External Floatin g Roo f Tanks (Welded ) > 10 k gallons : Floatin g roof

, o r close d ven t syste m controlle d at95 % b y weight . > 1 1 psia : Pressur e tan k with n o detectabl e emission s fNDE ) 20k-40 k gallon s an d > 4 psia , a n > 40 k gallon s an d > 0.7 5 psia : Floatin g roof

, o r 95 % contro l b y weight . > 1 1 psia : Pressur e tan k with NDE , o r 95 % contro l b y weight . > 25 0 gallons : Instal l a permanen

tsubmerge d fil l pipe . > 10 k gallons : Specifie d roo f

sea l and fitting s requirement

s (se e Sectio n 5.1.2.1) . > 20 k gallon s an d > 1. 5 psia ; o r > 40 k gallon s o f

an y liquids : Sam e sea l and fitting s requirements a s fo r ne w sources . Tank s o f welde d constructio n an d < 4 psia : N o secondary sea l require d i f specifie d primar

y seal s i n us e (se e Sectio n 5.1.2.2) . H . LIQUI D TRANSFE R A . Loadin g Rack s

B . Carg o Tank Leakag e > 0. 5 psia : 9 0 % emissio n reduction ; >1. 5 psia : Emissio n limi to f 1 0 m g pe r lite r o f

liqui d loaded . >1. 5 psia : Emissio n limi to f 2 1 mg/lite r o r 90 % contro l b y weight , whicheve r i s mor e stringen t Detaile d industr

y dat a neede d t o make a determination . III . EQUIPMEN T LEAK S Detaile d industr

y leak chec k practice dat a neede d t o mak e a determination ; se e Sectio n 5.1.5 . Tabl e continue d o n nex tpage .

1- 4

### DRAF T 3/19/9 8

TABL E 1-1 . SUMMAR Y O F P-MAC T DETERMINATION S (Cont. ) (Base d o n Federal , State,an d loca l ai r pollutio n rules ) P.2 0

Emissio n Sourc e P-MAC T New Source s Existin g Source s IV . WASTEWATE R TREATMEN T AN D CONTRO L

Floatin g roo f

fo r wastewate

r storag e tanks , or

95 % contro l by weight . Detaile d industr y wastewate

r treatmen t technolog y dat aneede d t o mak e adetermination ; se e Sectio n 5.1.4 . 

## tiliiiwwi i Detaile d industr y dat arequire d t o mak e adetermination . Th e developmen t

o f thes e preliminar y P-MAC T contro l level s i s describe d i n Sectio n 5 o f thi s document . A memorandu mpresentin g summarie s o f th e Stat e rule s reviewe d fo r thi s documen t i s include d a s Attachmen t 2 .

1- 5 

# 1 9

### DRAFT 3/19/9 8 2. 0 SOURC E CATEGOR Y AN D AFFECTE D SOURCE S I n th e backgroun d informatio n document 1 fo r th e EPA' s initial sourc e categor y listin g under Sectio n 112(c) , apreliminar y definitio n o f

thi s sourc e categor

y provide dtha t

Organi c Liquid s Distributio n (non-Gasoline ) sourc e categor y activitie s are associate dwith th e storag e and distributio n o f

non-gasolin e liquid s wit

h HA P content , at

site s that serv e a s distributio n point s fromwhic h organi c liquid s ma y b e obtaine dfo

r furthe r us e an dprocessing . Thi s definitio n i s ver y broad , an d th e res t

o f thi s sectio n i s devote dt o providin g more detai l in definin g th e makeup o f

thi s industry . Facility type s that

th e EP A project tea mi s currentl y evaluatin g withi n th e broadcategor y definitio n includ e (se e als o Attachmen t 1 , pag e 10) : 1 . Stand-alon e o r

separate distributio n terminal s 2 . Collocate d distributio n activitie s (i.e. , associate dwit h refinerie s o r

chemica l plants ) 3 . Pipelin e facilitie s afte

r th e point o f custod y transfe r 4 . Compounding/blending/packagin g plant s Followin g i s abrie f

discussio n o f

eac h typ e o f

facilit y bein g considere dwithi n th e overal l Organi c Liquid s Distributio n sourc e category . 2. 1 Stand-Alon e o r

Separat e Distributio n Termmal s Stand-alon e distributio n terminal s ar e commercia

l bul k liqui dloadin g terminal s tha t typicall y hav e storag e tanks , a s wel l a s pipin g andequipment t o transfe r th e liquids . Thes e terminal s receive , store , an d distribute organi c liquid s throughout th e Unite dStates . Mode s o f transportatio n fo

r stand-alon e terminal s include , bu t ar e no t limite dto , oceangoin g tankers , tan k barges , tan k

trucks , tan k

railcars , an dpipelines . Th e commoditie s handle da t thes e terminal s includ e avariet

y o f chemicals , crud e oil , fue

l oils , refinedpetroleu mproducts , animal fat s and oils , an d othe r

liquids . Customer s of

thes e terminal s include oi l producers , chemical manufacturers , produc t

manufacturers , utilities , an dtransportatio n companies . Man y o f thes e facilitie s are member s o f th e Independen

t Liqui dTerminal s Associatio n (ILTA) , whic h maintain s acurrent director y o f it s associate dmembe

r facilities 2

. Stand-alon e terminal Standard Industrial Classificatio n (SIC ) code s fall predominantly unde r Majo r Grou p 42 , Industr

y Group Number

4220 , SIC code 4226 , "Specia l Warehousin g andStorage , No t Elsewhere Classified. " Othe r SI C code s identifie db y th e EPA projec t tea minclud e 4491 , "Marin e Carg o Handling" , 5169 , "Chemical s andAllie dProducts , No t Elsewhere Classified, " 517 1 "Petroleu mBul k

Station s andTerminals, " and517 2 "Petroleu man dPetroleu mProduct s Wholesalers , excep t

Bulk Station s an

dTerminals. " Fo r

amor e detaile dpresentatio n o f 2- 1 

## Z DP.2 2



### DRAF T 3/19/9 8 applicabl e SI C codes , refe

r t o Attachment

1 , pag e 14 . 2. 2 Collocate d Distributio n Facilitie s Man y chemica

l an d petrochemica

l companie s andpetroleu mrefinerie s ma y hav e distributio n facilitie s i n th e for mo f tan k farm s an dpipeline s that

are collocate d(contiguou s an d under commo n control ) wit

h th e manufacturin g facilities . Thes e distributio n facilitie s woul d serv e simila

r function s t o thos e describe di n th e stand-alon e terminal source , th e only differenc e bein g tha t thes e facilitie s receiv e thei r materia l from acollocate dfacility . HAP-containin g liquid s ma y b e store d i n thes e facilitie s andthe n distribute dvi ath e variou s mode s of delivery . A t present , applicabl e SIC code s fo r collocate ddistributio n facilitie s are thought t o fall under th e Major Grou p 51 , whic h include s SIC code 5169 , "Chemical s andAllie dProducts , No t Elsewhere Classified. " I t

i s conceivabl e tha

t there ma y b e som e overla p i n SIC code s wit

h facilitie s regulate d b y th e Hazardou s Organi c NESHA P (HON ) and/o r

th e Refinerie s NESHAP . A furthe r determinatio n an d identificatio n o f applicabl e SIC code s wil l b e performedi n th e futur e (se e als o Attachment

1 , pag e 16) . 2. 3 Pipelin e Facilitie s Tw o type s o f

pipeline s are o f

interes t to th e Organi c Liquid s Distributio n sourc e category , crud e oi l pipeline s an d produc t (non-gasoline ) pipelines . Th e sourc e categor y i s considere d t o include petroleu mpipelin e facilitie s tha t handl e anddistribut

e non-gasolin e hydrocarbo n liquid s (containin g HAP ) afte

r th e poin t o f custod y transfe r fromoi l an dga s productio n operations . Thi s discussio n b y custod

y transfe r i s t o matc h th e propose doi l an dnatura l ga s rule . • A

t thi s time , i t

i s believe d tha t

th e principa

l liqui d o f interes t at thes e facilitie s i s crud e oil , becaus e o f it s significant vapo r pressure and th e larg e volume s tha t are transported . Pipelin e facilitie s ar e usuall y subsidiarie s o f

oi l an d ga s producin g companies . Crud e oi l pipeline s consis t o f flow lines , crude trunk

lines , an dbreakout

stations . Flo w line s carr y oi l fromth e producin g field to atreatment andstorag e facility , referredt o a s atank battery . Upo n bein g treated , oi l i s the n store di n leas e tank s fo r shipment . Upon leavin g aleas e tank (poin t o f custod y transfer) , oi l move s throug h gatherin g line s tha t transpor t th e oi l t o larg e tank farm s wher

e i t i s accumulate d prio r

t o bein g transporte dvi along-distanc e pipelines , referre d t o a s crude trunk

lines . Crude oi l i s transporte dthroug h pipeline s by pum p station s locate d alon g thei r

entir e length 3

. Breakou t tank s occur

a t man y pum p station s alon g pipeline s andserv e t o sort , measure , reroute , o r store crude oil . Thes e tank s ar e als o use dfo

r controllin g surg e capacitie s o f crud e oil . 2- 2 

# •2 1

### DRAF T 3/19/9 8 Produc t pipeline s represent

another categor y o f th e pipelin e industry . Produc t pipeline s mov e liquid s suc h a s natural ga s liquids , gasoline , aviatio n gasoline , fue l oils , an dother

organi c liquid s fromrefinerie s t o storag e anddistributio n facilities/terminal s i n area s wher e the y wil l b e consumed . Applicabl e SI C code s fo

r th e pipelin e industr

y primarily includ e Majo

r Group s 4 6 an d 47 , Industr

y Group Number s 461 0 and4780 , andth e followin g fou r code s (se e als o Attachment 1 , pag e 13) : 461 2 Crude Petroleu mPipeline s 461 3 Refine d Petroleu mPipeline s 461 9 Pipelines , No t Elsewher e Classifie d 478 9 Transportatio n Services , No t Elsewher e Classifie d Th e first thre e SI C code s relate to facilitie s tha t ar e engage di n th e pipelin e transportatio n o f petroleu man d othe

r liquids , excep t

natura l gas . SIC code 478 9 represent s independentl y operate d pipelin e termina

l facilities , but

als o "establishment s primaril y engage di n furnishin g transportatio n o r

service s incidenta

l t o transportation , no t

elsewher e classified." 4 2. 4 Compounding/Blending/Packagin g Facilitie s I t i s currentl y thought

tha t facilitie s exis t

tha t compoundandblen dan ddistribute organi c liquid s wit

h HA P content . Th e EP

A projec t tea mi s currently attemptin g t o identif y andlocate facilitie s tha t

fall under thi s broa d category . Man

y o f thes e facilitie s store HAP-containin g liquids , whic h the y blen d and packag e into container s rangin g fromu p t o abou t 60 0 gallon s t o les s than 1 gallon . Blendin g and packagin g operation s ma y b e carrie dou t

a t separat e (dedicated ) facilities , or the y ma y b e collocate d wit

h agenera l distributio n termina

l operation . (I n turn , th e distributio n termina

l ma y b e collocate dwit

h apetroleumrefiner

y o r achemica l productio n plant ; se e Sectio n 2.2. ) Applicabl e SI C code s fo

r thi s industr

y segmen t primaril y include Major

Group 51 , SI C cod e 5169 , "Chemical s and Allie d Products , No t Elsewher e Classified. " Thes e are "establishment s primarily engage d i n th e wholesal e distributio n o f chemical s an dallie d products." 4 Include d i n th e SI C code listin g ar

e establishment s tha

t distribute solvents , aromati c chemicals , acids , and als o facilitie s such a s chemica l bul k station s andterminal s (se e als o Attachment

1 , pag e 15) . T o locate and identif

y thes e facilities , th e EP

A projec t tea mha s contacte dth e National 2- 3 

# z Z

### DRAFT 3/19/9 8

Associatio n o f

Chemical Distributor s (NACD ) an di s reviewin g th e organization' s membe r directory 5

. Telephon e interview s wit h andsite visit s t o thes e facilitie s are als o planne dfo r alater poin t i n time . Th e projec t

tea mexpect s tha

t th e industr

y surve y wil l provid e informatio n o n th e emission s an d control s i n thi s industr y segment . 2. 5 Affecte d Sources/Conclusion s Th e EP A projec t

tea mha s decidedt o retai n th e broaddefinitio n o f th e organi c liquid s distributio n (OLD ) sourc e categor y a t thi s poin t i n th e projec t

s o a s no t t o inadvertentl y exclud e source s o f emissions . However , thi s definitio n i s expecte dt o b e improve da s additional informatio n i s gathere d o n th e industry . A s asupplement t o th e definition , specifi c facilit y type s an d activitie s wil l b e describe d i n orde r t o identif y th e affectedsources . A t

thi s time , dat aare stil l bein g collecte d t o identif y and locat

e th e stand-alon e an dcollocate dsource s o f interest . Th e focu s o f

th e projec t

i s majo r sources . Thes e are define dunde r Sectio n 11 2 o f

th e Ac t a s "any stationar

y sourc e o r

grou p o f stationar y source s locate dwithi n acontiguou s are aand unde r commo n contro l that

emit s or ha s th e potential t o emi t

considerin g controls , i n th e aggregate , 1 0 ton s pe r

yea r or mor e o f an y hazardou s air

pollutan t o r 2 5 ton s per

yea r o r more o f an y combinatio n o f

hazardou s ai

r pollutants. " Th e EPA' s listin g o f HAP sourc e categorie s liste d th e OL D categor y a s amajo

r sourc e category , bu t

no t a s a n are asourc e category . However , th e EP A plan s t o perfor

mafinding fo

r OL D are asources , t o determin e whether the y presen t

athrea t o f advers e effect s t o huma

n healt h o r th e environment . Unde

r §112(c)(3) , standard s ma

y b e warrante d fo

r are asource s i n th e cas e o f afindin g o f

advers e effects t o huma

n healt h o r th e environment .

2- 4 

## 2 3P.2 5



### DRAF T 3/19/9 8 3. 0 EMISSION SOURCE S Informatio n collecte d t o dat e confirm s th e initial presumptio n o f th e EP A projec t team that emissio n source s a

t organi c liquid s distributio n (non-gasoline ) facilitie s ar e generall y simila

r t o emissio n source s i n industrie s studie dunde r previou s NESHAP . Facilitie s wit h thes e similaritie s includ e petroleu mrefineries , chemica l productio n plants , andbulk gasolin e terminals . Thes e facilit

y type s hav e th e following emissio n source s i n common : 1 . Storag e vessel s 2 . Liqui d transfe

r activitie s (loadin g racks ) 3 . Leak s fromequipment

component s (pumps , valves , etc. ) 4 . Wastewater

an d waste collectio n an

dtreatment . A t th e facilitie s that

blen d o r packag e liquids , thes e blendin g an dpackagin g activitie s ma y als o constitute aseparate sourc e o f emissions . I n many cases , th e sourc e descriptions , emissio n estimatio n techniques , an dcontro l technolog y determination s made for thes e othe r standard s ma

y hav e applicabilit

y t o OL D sources . Thi s typ e o f

infonnatio n i s bein g studie dfo r severa l other NESHA P industrie s with thes e emissio n source s and that ma y hav e collocate d liqui ddistributio n activities . Th e five categorie s o f

emissio n source s mentione dabove presently ar e considere dt o b e th e principal OL D emissio n sources , an d ar

e describe d i n th e following sections . 3. 1 Storag e Vessel s Tw o basi c categorie s o f

storag e vessel s ar

e foun da t OL D facilities : 1 . Liqui d storag e tank s at terminal s o

r othe r distributio n operation s 2 . Breakou t

tank s at pipelin e station s At stand-alon e o r

separate liqui dterminal s o r a t distributio n operation s collocate d with a productio n facilit

y (chemica

l productio n o

r petroleumrefinery) , storag e tank s receiv e incomin g organi c liquid s an d distribute the mback out o f th e facility . Mode s o f

transpor t include : inlan d waterwa y barges , tanker

(oceangoing ) vessels , tan

k trucks , railwa

y tankcars , andpipelines . Petroleu mpipeline s are use dt o transpor t crude oi l andpetroleu mproduct s afte r th e poin t o f custod y transfe r fromoi l productio n operations . A t th e pipelin e pum

p stations , "breakou t tanks " are use d fo

r surg e capacity , sorting , measuring , rerouting , an dtemporar y storage . Thes e breakout tank s receiv e liqui d fromth e pipeline , andthe n retur n i t bac k t o th e sam

e pipeline . 3- 1 

# z-4 -P.2 6



### DRAF T 3/19/9 8 Storag e tank

emission s resul t

frombreathin g andworkin g losses . Flas h losse s from crud e oi l ma

y als o occur ; however , industr y ha s contende dtha

t flashin g i s uniqu e to th e crud e oi l extractio n process , where th e crude i s "live " an drelease s entraine do r dissolve dgase s whil e i n storage 6

. 3. 2 Liqui d Transfe r Operation s Hazardou s air

pollutant s ma

y b e emitte dfromdeliver

y vessel s bein g loade da

t afacilit y a s vapor s present

in th e tank

ar e displace db y th e incomin g liquid . Thes e emission s ma y consis t o f vapor s remainin g from apreviou s cargo , or ma y b e generate dfro

mth e liqui dbein g loaded , or a combinatio n o f

both . In controlle dsystems , th e vapor s ar e route dt o afixedroo f

storag e tank (vapo r balanc e system ) o r

t o avapo r

contro l device . Fugitiv e (vapo r leakage ) emission s at controlle d loadin g rack s ca n als o occur

du e t o leakag e point s i n th e transpor t tan k o r th e facility' s vapo r collectio n system . 3. 3 Leak s from EquipmentComponent s Th e pumps , compressors , valves , andother equipmen t component s i n th e line s tha t transpor t th e liquid s ca

n develo p liqui do r

vapo r leak s fromwhic h HAP ma y b e emitted . Emissio n factor s hav e bee n develope dfo r severa l type s o f facilities , an danumber

o f Federal regulation s addres s thi s emissio n sourc e (se e Sectio n 5.2) . 3. 4 Wastewate r and Othe r Waste s Wastewate

r i s generate d du e t o tan

k andlin e cleanings , spills , liqui dblendin g o r packagin g operations , rainwater drainage , o r

other sources . Wastewate

r i s processe da

t some distributio n facilitie s throug h severa l type s o f treatment systems , includin g clarificatio n unit s an d gravit y separators . I f

suc h water

i s expose dt o th e atmospher e (i n uncovere dculverts , separators , sumps , o r other collectio n devices) , th e HA P constituent s i n th e water

can b e release da s ai r emissions . Th e projec t

tea mi s continuin g t o investigat e emissio n source s an dpotentia l controls , an d expect s t o rel y o n th e industr y survey fo

r dat apertinen

t t o thi s industry . Othe r waste containin g HA

P (suc h a s semi-soli dsludge ) ma y b e generate dfro

mth e sam e typ e o f source s mentione d abov e fo r wastewater , a s wel l a s othe r sources . Thi s wast

e i s often store d i n close d containers , and the n shippe dof f site fo r treatment at aspecialize doff-sit

e treatment facility . Thes e waste s are als o frequentl y regulate dunder

existin g hazardou s waste regulations . Informatio n i s bein g collecte do n th e type s andamount s o f semi-aqueou s waste , and o n whethe r it constitute s asignifican

t ai r emissio n sourc e whil e a

t th e distributio n facility .
3-2 

## 2S ~P.2 7



### DRAF T 3/19/9 8 3. 5 Blendin g an d Packagin g Activitie s Specifi c HA P emissio n point s an demissio n rate s i n liqui dblendin g an dpackagin g operation s are no t

presentl y known . Furthermore , only limite ddataandinformatio n i s availabl e o n th e product s resultin g fromth e mixing/blendin g operations . I t i s believe dtha t

th e transfer

o f liquid s betwee n container s ma y constitut e a n emissio n sourc e simila

r t o th e emission s discusse d fo r carg o tank s i n Sectio n 3.2 . Additiona l source s ma

y involv e th e othe

r source s previousl y described ; i.e. , storag e tanks , leak s frompipin g andequipmen t components , wastewater , and other wastes . Th e projec t

tea mi s presently gatherin g informatio n o n th e detail s o f thes e operations .

C

3- 3 

## 71P.2 8



### DRAF T 3/19/9 8 4. 0 EMISSION CONTROL S The emissio n source s discusse di n Sectio n 3 are subjec t t o avariet

y o f contro l measures , a s mandate d b y existin g Federal , State , andloca l air regulations . Thi s sectio n describe s th e principa l emissio n control s believe d t o b e i n us e fo r OL D operations . Sectio n 5 wil l discus s th e level s of contro l require d under

existin g regulations . 4. 1 Storag e Vessel s Th e population s o f

fixed-roo f andfloating roo f

typ e storag e vessel s use dwithi n th e organi c liquid s distributio n industr y hav e no t ye t bee n established . Emission s from fixed-roof tank s ca n b e reduce d b y usin g avapo r contro l systemt o captur

e hydrocarbon s tha

t escap e a s breathin g or

workin g losses . I n thes e systems , vapor s are route dthroug h pipin g t o acontro l device . Anothe

r commo n contro l approac h i s th e installatio n o f a n internal o r

externa l floatin g roo f tha t include s seal s aroun d th e perimete r andsometime s other

fitting control s t o minimiz e emissions . Fo r

hig h vapo r

pressure liquids , pressurize do r refrigerate dtank s ar

e ofte n use d t o contai n th e materia

l an d prevent

emission s (se e als o Attachment 1 , pag e 25) . 4. 2 Liqui d Transfe r Operation s Liqui d transfe

r into tank trucks , railcars , or

smalle r container s ca

n b e controlle dthroug h th e us e o f submerge d filling , avapor collectio n andcontro l system , o r b y balancin g th e vapor s bac k t o th e vesse l that

supplie d th e liqui d(excep t pipelines) . I n thes e vapor

collectio n systems , care mus t b e exercise d t o ensure tha

t vapor s ar e no t los t du e t o leakage . A requirement for vapo r tightnes s maintenanc e an d testin g ha s bee n acomponen t o f mos t liqui dtransfe

r regulations . Thes e provision s appl y t o bot h th e facilit

y equipmen

t andth e mobil e carg o tank . The y ar e intende d t o ensure tha

t collecte d vapor s ar

e no t los t throug h leakin g connectors , valves , an d pipin g (se e als o Attachment 1 , pag e 25) . 4. 3 EquipmentComponent s Th e primar y contro l option s availabl e fo r reducin g emission s du e t o equipmen t leak s includ e modifying o r

replacin g existin g equipmen t wit h leakles s equipment , an

dimplementin g a lea k detectio n an d repair

(LDAR) program . A

n LDA Rprogra mtypicall y consist s o f

periodi c inspectio n o f

component s fo

r leak s usin g ahydrocarbo n analyzer . A n alternativ e t o instrumen t LDA Ruse d by some companie s an dspecifiedi n som e rule s i s aroutin e visua

l inspectio n progra m(se e als o Attachment

1 , pag e 25) .

4- 1



## yj\P.2 9



### DRAF T 3/19/9 8 4. 4 Wastewate r and Othe r Waste s Contro l o f HAP emission s fromwastewate r ca n b e achieve db y ventin g th e clarifier (wher e used ) t o avapo r

contro l syste mandenclosin g th e separator wit h afloating roo f

(liqui d contact ) o r

vapor-tight

cove r (non-contact) . Othe

r contro l method s includ e th e us e o f close d pipin g (versu s ope n trenche s o r viaducts ) anddrai n controls , suc h a s p-trap s an dwater seal s (se e als o Attachmen t

1 , pag e 30) . Fo r semi-aqueou s waste (e.g. , sludge) , contro l woul dconsis t o f limitin g direc t

exposure to th e atmosphere throug h storag e o f th e wast e in seale dcontainers , an dlimitin g th e tim e durin g handlin g that

th e waste i s exposed .

4- 2

-7P NP.3 0



### DRAF T 3/19/9 8 5. 0 CURRENT CONTRO L LEVEL S Th e presumptiv e MAC T (P-MACT ) determinatio n i s derive dfrom athoroug h revie w of th e curren t

Federa l and Stat

e regulation s applicabl e t o emissio n point s of concer n fo r th e Orgam c Liquid s Distributio n NESHAP . Specifi c sourc e informatio n wil l b e provide dfromth e planne d industr

y survey . Th e determination s fo r existin g source s i n thi s P-MAC T are base d o n an averag e o f

th e to p 1 2 percen t

of th e standard s i n th e Stat

e regulation s reviewed . Th e determination s i n thi s document fo r P-MAC T fo

r ne w source s are base do n th e mos t stringent Stat e o r Federa l regulatio n requirement s fo r simila r emissio n sources . Sectio n 112(d) state s tha t standard s for

ne w an d existin g source s mus t

b e derive dfrom"th e emissio n contro l tha t i s achieve d i n practic e b y th e bes t controlle dsimila

r source. " Again , littl e curren t industr y practic e informatio n i s availabl e a t eac h source ; therefore , thi s P-MAC T ha s bee n derive d fromcontro l level s found i n Federal , State , an dloca l regulation s tha

t apply t o simila

r industries . 5. 1 Conclusion s o n Leve l o f Control 5.1. 1 Fixe d Roo f

Storag e Tank s I n general , th e stringenc y o f storag e tan k

regulation s varie s dependin g o n several v factors , whic h includ e vapo r pressur e cutoffs , storag e tank volume cutoffs , floatin g roo f seal requirements , floatin g roo f fitting s requirements , an dvapo r control/reductio n requirements . 5.1.1. 1 Lo w Vapo r

Pressur e ( < 1 1 psia ) Organi c Liquid s Fixe dRoo f Storag e Fo r storag e vessel s containin g low vapo r pressur e organi c liquids , P-MAC T wa s derive d from5 1 Stat

e regulations , andaugmente dwit h knowledg e of

th e Hazardou s Organi c NESHAP (HON) , Benzen e Storag e NESHAP , andth e Storag e Vesse l NSP S (4 0 CF R60 , subpar t Kb) . I n mos t

case s th e Stat

e regulation s apply t o th e entire State , whil e other s apply onl y i n certai n area s of

th e State , suc h a s urba n area s tha t are nonattainmen

t fo r ozone . Th e top 1 2 percent , i n term s o f stringency , of

th e storag e vessel regulation s were regulation s for urban o r nonattainment

areas . Th e distributio n o f Stat e standard s i s a s follows : To p 12 % ( 5 o f

5 1 rules ) - > 19,80 0 gallon s and> 1. 5 psia ; o r > 39,63 0 gallon s and> 0. 5 psia : Mus t hav e afloatin g roo f

o r vapo r contro l a t 95 % b y weight . To p 25 % (1 3 o f

5 1 rules , als o equivalen tt o 4 0 CFR60 , subpartKb ) -



### 5- 1

- 7 QP.3 1



### DRAF T 3/19/9 8

> 20,000 gallon s an d< 40,00 0 gallon s and> 4 psia ; o r > 40,000 gallon s and> 0.7 5 psia : Mus t hav e afloatin g roo f

o r vapo r contro l at 95 % b y weight . To p 35 % (1 8 o f

5 1 rules ) - > 40,00 0 gallon s an d> 1. 5 psia : Pressur e tank , floatin g roof , o r vapo r contro l at 95 % b y weight . Th e requirement s of

th e Storag e Vesse l NSPS , subpar t Kb , are note dabove . Ri mseal s mus t consis t o f aliqui d mounte d seal , mechanica l sho e seal , o r

avapor-mounte dprimar

y sea l plu s secondar

y seal . Severa

l o f th e fitting s o n th e tank

als o hav e contro l requirement s unde r Subpar t Kb . Th e MAC T standard s fo r storag e vessel s i n th e HO N an dth e Benzen e Emission s fromStorag e Vessel s (Benzen e Storage ) NESHA P requir e afloating roo f

o r aclose dven t syste mvente d t o acontro l devic e at 9 5 percen t

emissio n reductio n for

an y storag e tan k > 10,00 0 gallons . Th e HO N requirement s are fo r storag e tank s associate dwit h aproces s uni t whic h hol d an

y organi c HA P a s liste di n Tabl e 2 o f 4 0 CFR63 , subpar

t F . Th e Benzen e NESHA P standard s ar e for th e storag e of

benzen e withi n aspecifie drang e o f specifi c gravities . Base d o n thes e Federal , State , andloca l regulations , P-MAC T fo

r new sources i s equivalen t t o afloatin g roo f

o r 95 % emissio n reductio n for organi c HA P liquid s store d i n storag e tank s > 10,00 0 gallons . Fo r existing sources, P-MAC T i s equivalent t o th e averag e o f th e to p 12 % o f

th e state regulation s a s show n above . 5.1.1. 2 Hig h Vapo r

Pressur e ( > 1 1 psia ) Organi c Liquid s Fixe dRoo f Storag e Th e determinatio n fo

r hig h vapo r

pressure organi c liquid s storag e i s base do n 1 5 State regulations , an d augmente d b y th e HON , th e Benzene Storag e NESHAP , th e Storag e Vesse l NSP S (subpar

t Kb) , an d th e Storag e Vesse l NESHA P (subpar t WW ) whic h i s ye t

t o b e proposed . Al l o f

th e regulation s reviewe dconsidere dan y organi c liqui d> 1 1 psi at o fit th e definitio n o f

a"hig h vapo r

pressure " o r

"extremely volatile " liquid . Th e mos t stringen t rule s (to p 2 0 percent ) consiste d of on e urban are arul e (Sa

n Diego ) andtw o statewid e rule s (Colorad o an d New Mexico) . Th e distributio n o f thes e standard s i s a s follows : To p 20 % ( 3 o f

1 5 rules ) - Operate apressure tank wit h n o detectabl e emission s To p 50 % ( 4 o f

1 5 rules ) - Pressur e tan

k o r vapo r contro l a t 90 % efficiency To p 75 % ( 4 of

1 5 rules ) - Vapo r

contro l a t 85 % efficiency Th e unpropose d 4 0 CFR63 , subpar t W W NESHA

P for storag e vessel s require s that al l pressur e tank s operate wit h n o detectabl e organi c emissions . Th e requirement s o f th e NSP S fo r Storag e o f

Organi c Liquids , 4 0 CFR60 , subpar t K b are to operate aclose dvent system , 5- 2 

# ^nP.3 2



### DRAF T 3/19/9 8 wit h n o detectabl e organi c emissions , tha t i s route dt o acontro l devic e t o reduc e emission s b y 9 5 % . Th e MAC T standard s for storag e vessel s i n th e HO N andth e Benzene Storag e NESHA P requir e tha t

i f apressur e vesse l i s used , i t mus t hav e n o detectabl e organi c emissions . Base d o n thes e Federal , Stat e an dloca l regulations , P-MAC T fo

r th e storag e o f

hig h vapo r pressur e liquid s ( > 1 1 psia ) fo r ne w source s i s t o operate apressure tank wit h n o detectabl e emissions . Fo r existin g sources , P-MAC T i s t o operate apressur e tan k with n o detectabl e emission s o r

avapo r contro l systemat

95 % b y weigh

t emissio n reduction . 5.1.1. 3 Smal l Fixe d Roo f Storag e Vessel s Th e P-MAC T leve l fo

r smal l tank s that

ar e to p loade dwa s derive dfrom1 0 Stat e regulations . Eigh t

o f th e te n regulation s ar e statewid e regulations . Th e to p 1 0 percen t consist s of

th e Chicago-Area , Illinoi s regulation . Th e remainin g standard s are a s follows : To p 10 % ( 1 o f

1 0 rules ) - > 25 0 gallons ; Orgamc liquids ; To p loaded : Equippe d wit

h apermanent

submerge dfill pipe . To p 50 % ( 4 o f

1 0 rules) - > 1,00

0 gallon s an dorgani c liquid s > 1. 5 psia ; To p loaded : Equippe d wit

h apermanent

submerge dfill pipe . N o Federa l regulation s wit h regardt o smal l storag e tank s hav e bee n locate dat present . Base d o n th e 1 0 Stat

e regulation s reviewed , P-MAC T for ne w andexistin g source s i s th e sam e a s fo r th e to p 10 % liste d above ; i.e. , apermanent submerge dfill pip e installe d i n al l to p loade d stationar

y tank s >25 0 gallons . 5.1. 2 Externa l Floatin g Roo f Tank s Withi n th e Stat

e and regional regulations , nin e o f which were reviewe dfor

th e purpos e of determinin g P-MAC T fo

r external floating roo f

tanks , there ar e severa

l categorie s of standards . Th e first

categor y i s th e genera

l standards . Secondar e exemption s an dstandard s fo r welde d tanks . Lastly , standard s exis t tha t apply t o tank s use dt o stor e produce dcrud e oi l and condensate prio r

t o leas e custod

y transfer . 5.1.2. 1 General Standard s Th e stringenc y o f

th e contro l requirement s for external floatin g roo f

tan k ri mseal s a s liste d belo w i s simila

r among th e Federal (HON , subpar t WW , andsubpar

t Kb ) andState 5- 3


### ?L \P.3 3



### DRAF T 3/19/9 8 regulations . Th e externa l floatin g roo f seal requirements i n th e rule s reviewe dar e a s follows : Fo r petroleu mliqui d storage : 1 . Tan k mus t b e fitte d wit

h acontinuou s rim-mounte dsecondar y sea l extendin g from th e floatin g roo f

t o th e tank

wall ; 2 . Al l sea

l closur e device s mus t

hav e n o visibl e tear s o r

opening s i n th e fabri c an d b e intac t an d uniforml y i n plac e aroun dth e circumferenc e of th e floatin g roof

; 3 . Fo r vapor-mounte d primar

y seals , th e accumulate dare aof individua l gap s (>0.12 5 inch ) betwee n th e secondar y sea l an d th e tan

k wall , mus t

no t excee d1. 0 square inc h pe r foo t o f diameter ; 4 . Excep t

durin g loadin g whic h begin s whe n th e tank i s empty , th e floatin g roo f i s t o remai n floatin g o n th e liqui da t al l times . Fo r non-petroleu morgani c liqui dstorage : 1 . Fo r tank s equippe d wit

h amechanica

l sho e primar

y seal , th e tank

mus t b e fitted wit h acontinuou s rim-mounte dsecondar y sea l extendin g fromth e floatin g roo f t o th e tan k wall ; 2 . Fo r tank s equippe d wit

h avapor-mounte dprimar

y seal , th e tan

k mus t b e fitted wit h aliquid-mounte d primar y sea l an d acontinuou s rim-mounte dsecondar y sea l extendin g fromth e floatin g roo f t o th e tan k wall ; 3 . Al l seal closur e device s mus t hav e n o visibl e tear s o r

opening s i n th e fabri c an d b e intac t and uniforml y i n plac e aroun dth e circumferenc e o f th e floatin g roof

; 4 . Fo r vapor-mounte d primar

y seals , th e accumulatedare ao f individua l gap s ( > 0.12 5 inch ) betwee n th e secondar y sea l an d th e tan

k wall , mus t

no t excee d1. 0 square inc h pe r foot o f diameter ; 5 . Excep t durin g loadin g whic h begin s when th e tank i s empty , th e floatin g roo f i s t o remai n floatin g o n th e liqui d a t al l times . Th e external floatin g roo f

fittings requirements fo

r organi c liqui dstorag e are : 1 . Automati c bleede r

vent s ar e t o b e close da

t all time s excep t

when th e roo f

i s floate d of f o r lande d o n th e roo f

supports . 2 . Emergenc y roo f

drain s are t

o b e provide dwit

h slotte dmembran e fabri c covers , o r equivalent whic h cove r

at leas t 9 0 percent

of th e are ao f

th e opening ; an d 3 . Eac h automati c bleede r ven t (vacuu mbreake r vent) an d ri mspac e ven

t mus t b e equippe d wit

h agasket . Becaus e of

th e similarit

y i n th e sea

l andfitting s requirement s among th e Federal and 5- 4


### •2 . 

### 7 .P.3 4



### DRAF T 3/19/9 8 Stat e rules , th e distributio n of standard s show n belo w i s base do n tank volume andvapo r pressur e cutoffs . Th e general external floatin g roo f tan k standard s ar e distribute db y stringenc y a s follows : To p 10 % ( 1 rule , New York ) - > 20,00 0 gallon s and> 1. 5 psia ; o r > 40,00 0 gallons : Roo f

sea l andfitting s requirement s a s liste dabove . To p 40 % ( 3 rules ) - > 40,00 0 gallons : Roo f sea l andfitting s requirement s a s liste d above . To p 50 % ( 1 rule ) - > 40,00 0 gallon s and> 1. 0 psia : Roo f seal an dfitting s requirement s a s liste dabove . To p 60 % ( 1 rule ) - > 40,00 0 gallon s an d> 1. 5 psia : Roo f seal an dfitting s requirement s a s liste dabove . Base d o n th e Federal , State , andloca l regulation s reviewed , P-MAC T fo r new sources i s th e applicatio n o f

th e abov e liste dseal andfittings requirement s t o storag e o f organi c HA P liquid s i n storag e tank s > 10,00 0 gallons . Fo r existing sources, P-MAC T i s th e averag e o f th e to p 1 0 percen t

of th e Stat e regulation s a s show n above ; tha t is , th e aforementione dsea l and fitting s requirement s apply t o storag e tank s > 20,00 0 gallon s storin g liquid s > 1. 5 psia , and t o tank s >40,00 0 gallon s storin g an y organi c liquids . 5.1.2. 2 Tank s of

Welde d Constructio n Th e exemptio n o f

welde d tank s fromth e requirement for asecondar

y seal o n external floatin g roof

s equippe d wit

h aliquid-mounte dfoa

mseal , liquid-mounte dliquid-fille dtyp e seal , o r ametallic-typ e sho e sea

l wa s determine dfromarevie w o f th e CT G fo

r Petroleu mLiqui d Storag e i n Externa l Floatin g Roo f Tank s andeigh t

regional andstatewid e regulations . Eac h o f thes e regulation s ha s th e sam e standard : To p 100 % (al l 8 rules ) - Al l externa l floatin g roo f

tank s o f welde dconstructio n containin g petroleu mliquid s < 4 psia : N o secondar y seal i s require di f

th e primar y seal i s aliquid-mounte dfoa mseal , liquid-mounte dliquid-fille dtyp e seal , metallic-typ e sho e seal , o r equivalent . 5.1.2. 3 Produce d Crud e Oi l andCondensat e Storag e Th e CT G fo

r Petroleu mLiquid s Storag e i n Externa l Floatin g Roo f

Tanks , th e Storag e Vesse l NSP S (4 0 CF R60 , subpar t Kb) , 1 8 statewide , and2 regional/urban regulation s (Chicag o Are aan d Distric t o f Columbia) allo w a n exemptio n fromregulatio n fo r external floatin g roo f

tank s < 420,00 0 gallon s whic h stor e produce dcrud e oi l o r condensate prio r

t o 5- 5



## -xo.P.3 5



### DRAFT 3/19/9 8 leas e custod

y transfer . Th e sourc e categor y fo r thi s NESHA P i s likely to no t includ e crude oi l an d condensate prio r

t o leas e custod

y transfe r becaus e they ar e currentl y propose dt o b e controlle d unde r

th e Oi l an d Ga s MAC T rule ; therefore , n o P-MAC T exemptio n i s neede d fo r suc h tanks . 5.1. 3 Liqui d Transfe r

Operation s P-MAC T wa s investigate d fo r bot h o f th e emissio n source s under liqui dtransfer : loadin g rac k

vapo r collection , an

d vapor leakag e fromcarg o tank s an dvapor collectio n equipment . 5.1.3. 1 Loadin g Rack s Th e P-MAC T determinatio n fo r loadin g rac k

vapo r collectio n wa s derive dfromth e HON , Benzen e Transfe r

Operation s NESHAP (4 0 CFR61 , subpar t BB) , Gasolin e Distributio n NESHAP (4 0 CF R63 , subpar t R) , Marin e Vessel Loadin g Operation s NESHA P (4 0 CF R63 , subpar t Y) , an d 2 5 Stat

e regulations . Som

e Stat e regulation s contai n provision s base do n vapo r emission s contro l b y percent reduction , whil e other s ar e base do n a n emissio n limitatio n i n unit s o f mg/L o r lb/1,00 0 gallon s loaded . Th e determinatio n of relativ e stringenc y i s complex , and varie s dependin g o n th e uncontrolle demissio n facto r o f th e liquid s i n question . Fo r transfer of hig h vapo r

pressure liquids , an emissio n limi t standar dwouldb e mor e stringent . Fo r

lo w vapo r

pressure liquid s transfer , emission s reductio n o n aweight percentag e basi s i s more stringent . Thi s issu e will b e investigate dfurthe r fo r th e principa

l liquid s o f interes t i n th e OLD category . Fo r th e purpos e o f

P-MACT , th e following i s considere d t o b e th e stringenc y distributio n o f th e curren t

standards : To p 5 % (California , South Coast ) - Organi c liquid s >0. 5 psia : Vapo r contro l a t 90 % b y weigh t Organi c liquid s >1. 5 psia : 1 0 mg/L (0.0 8 lb/1,00 0 gallons ) emissio n limi t To p 10 % (California , Ba y Area ) - Organi c liquid s > 1. 5 psia ; 2 1 mg/ L (0.1 7 lb/1,00 0 gallons ) emissio n limit , o r vapo r contro l a t 90% , whichever

i s mor e stringent . To p 15 % (Texas-Houston ) - Organi c liquid s >0. 5 psia : Vapor contro l at 90 % To p 35 % - Organi c liquid s > 1. 5 psia : Vapor contro l a t 95 % To p 50 % - Organi c liquid s > 1. 5 psia : Vapor-tight vapo r balanc e syste m To p 75 % - Organi c liquids : Submerge dloadin g required . Th e HO N standard s fo

r transfe r operation s o

f organi c HAP stat

e tha t new source s mus t 5- 6 

# *>4 -P.3 6



### DRAF T 3/19/9 8 hav e avapo r

recover y syste mthat

reduce s emission s b y 9 8 percent . Fo r existin g sources , th e emission s mus t

b e reduce d b y 9 7 percent . Th e Gasolin e Distributio n NESHAP andth e Refiner y NESHAP se t

th e sam e emissio n limit , 1 0 mg/L fo r gasolin e transfer

operations . Th e Benzen e Transfer

Operation s NESHA P require s 9 8 percen t emissio n reductio n of

any organi c liqui d that i s a t leas t 7 0 percen t

benzene , b y mean s o f

avapor-tigh t

vapo r recover y system . Th e Marin e Vesse l NESHA P require s 9 8 an d9 7 percen t

emissio n reductio n of

an y organi c liqui d > 1. 5 psi afor

new an d existin g sources , respectively . Emission s limitation s specifie d i n th e bul k termina l CT G an d th e NSP S fo

r bulk gasolin e terminal s ar e 8 0 mg/ L and3 5 mg/L , respectively . P-MAC T fo

r new sources i s arequiremen t of 90 % emissio n reductio n fo r organi c liquid s >0. 5 psia , an d an emissio n limi t o f 1 0 mg/ L fo r organi c liquid s > 1. 5 psia . P-MAC T for existing sources applie s t o organi c liquid s > 1. 5 psia , andconsist s o f arequirement

o f 90 % emissio n reductio n o r

an emissio n limi t

o f 2 1 mg/ L o f liqui dloaded , whicheve

r i s mor e stringent . 5.1.3. 2 Vapo r

Leakag e Contro l requirement s fo r

vapo r leakag e fromcontrolle dliqui dtransfer operation s hav e been specifie d i n several State rules , th e Tan k Truc k CTG , th e Bul k

Gasolin e Terminal NSPS , an d th e Gasolin e Distributio n NESHAP . Thes e standard s consis t o f a n annua l vapo r tightnes s tes t fo r tank truck s (and sometime s railcars ) andlea k testin g usin g acombustibl e ga s detector . I n additio n t o thes e requirements , DO T require s periodi c hydrostati c pressur e testin g o f tan k vehicles . Th e vapo r

tightnes s requirement s b y th e State s andth e EP A hav e primaril y addresse d gasolin e transfer operations . A t thi s time , th e applicabilit

y of th e curren t

vapo r tightnes s contro l level s t o general organi c liquid s distributio n i s unknown . Th e projec t tea mwil l b e collectin g additional information , and the n performin g analyse s o f floo r contro l level s an demissio n reductio n potential fro

mthes e measures . 5.1. 4 Wastewate

r Treatmen t Th e determinatio n relate d t o air emission s fro

mwastewater

durin g collectio n an d treatmen t i s based o n arevie w of

seven current

statewide wastewater

regulations . Fou r

Stat e regulation s hav e standard s for oil-water separator s tha

t handl e >20 0 gallons/da

y o f wastewater

containin g an

y volatil e organi c compund s >0. 5 psia . I n general , th e State wastewater

regulation s ar e case-specifi c an dindustry-specific . Thus , they ma y no t b e applicabl e t o distributio n facilitie s i n th e OL D sourc e category . I n orde r to develo p appropriate MAC T standard s for wastewater , more informatio n wil l b e obtaine db y th e projec t

5- 7 

## ^< TP.3 7



### DRAF T 3/19/9 8
tea mwit h respec t t o curren t industr y wastewater

technologie s andprocesses . Th e HON , Benzene Wast

e Operations , an dOil-Wate r Separato r NESHA P offe

r som e guidanc e for

evaluatin g th e bes t

curren t contro l performanc e i n wastewater treatmen t operations . Th e HO N standard s fo r wastewater

separators , drai n systems , treatmen t systems , and surfac e impoundment s are base dupo n wastewate r which : 1 . contain s > 1 0 ppm

w total volatil e organi c HAP s andha s aflo w rat e >0.0 2 liters/minute ; o r 2 . contain s > 10,00 0 ppm w at an y flo w rate . Th e wastewater

operation s o f

th e facilitie s i n the . Organi c Liquid s Distributio n sourc e categor y ar e likel y t o hav e similaritie s t o thos e a t aHON-regulate d productio n facility ; therefore , P-MAC T fo

r new sources i s th e requirement fo r afloating roo f

o r contro l devic e a

t 9 5 percen t

emissio n reductio n fo

r wastewater , a s definedabove , i n storag e tanks . Currently , th e practice s o f

th e sourc e categor

y are no t know n i n sufficien

t detai l t o develo p P-MAC T fo r wastewater

treatmen t fo r existing sources. Th e upcoming industr y surve y i s expecte d t o provid e th e detaile d informatio n neede dt o determin e th e appropriate contro l levels . 5.1. 5 Equipmen

t Leak s Th e equipment

a t facilitie s i n th e Organi c Liquid s Distributio n sourc e categor y ar e assume d t o b e simila

r t o thos e a t aHON , Refinery , o r

Gasolin e Distributio n facility . Th e HO N an d Refiner

y NESHA P hav e ful l instrument

LDA Rrequirements , whil e th e Gasolin e Distributio n NESHA P ha s avisua l lea k chec k standard . I t

i s no t know n presently , whic h standard i s mor e reasonabl e fo r th e Organi c Liquid s Distributio n P-MACT , therefor e there i s n o P-MAC T determinatio n fo r ne w sources . T o determin e th e equipmen t lea k standard s fo

r existin g sources , mor

e detaile d informatio n a s t

o th e current

practice s withi n th e sourc e categor y i s needed . Thes e dataare expecte dt o b e collecte di n th e planne dindustr y survey . 5.1. 6 Blendin g and Packagin g Specifi c rule s affectin

g blendin g an dpackaging activitie s directl y hav e no t bee n identified ; therefore , n o P-MAC T determinatio n fo r thi s emissio n sourc e ha s bee n made . Additional informatio n i s planne d t o b e collecte dthroug h sit e visits , other

contact s wit

h industr y an d trad e groups , and th e industr y survey o f

individua l facilities . Analyse s of

floo r level s o f contro l and potentia

l emission s reductio n wil l b e performe dusin g thi s information .

5- 8



# ^ UP.3 8



### DRAF T 3/19/9 8 5.2 Federal Regulation s Belo w ar e brie f

summarie s o f

severa l Federal rule s that

ma y apply o r hav e simila

r contro l level s an d technologie s t o th e distributio n facilitie s i n thi s sourc e category . 5.2. 1 Hazardou s Organi c NESHA P (HON ) (subpart s F , G , H , I ) Th e HON applie s t o chemica l manufacturin g proces s unit s tha t are : (1 ) par

t o f amajor sourc e a s define d i n sectio n 11 2 of th e Act ; (2 ) produc e a s aprimar y produc t aSOCMI chemica

l liste d i n Tabl e 1 o f

subpar t F ; and (3 ) us e a s areactan t o r manufactur

e a s aproduc t

o r by-produc t o r co-produc t

on e o r mor e o f th e organi c HAP s liste dTabl e 2 o f subpar t F . Amon g other

thing s th e HON set s contro l requirement s fo r storag e vessel s an dtransfe r operations . Th e storag e vesse l provision s d o no t apply t o th e following : (1 ) pressure vessel s designe d t o operate i n exces s o f

204. 9 kP a(29. 7 psia) ; (2 ) vessel s wit h capacitie s smaller

than 3 8 m 3 (10,00 0 gallons) ; (3 ) wastewater tanks ; an d(4 ) vessel s storin g liquid s tha t contai n organi c HAP s only a s impurities . Th e storag e provision s require that on e o f th e following contro l system s b e applied : (1 ) a

n internal floatin g roo f

wit h prope r seal s andfittings; (2 ) a

n externa l floatin g roo f wit h proper seal s an d fittings; (3 ) a

n externa l floatin g roo f

converte dt o a

n internal floatin g roo f wit h proper seal s an d fittings; o r

(4 ) aclose dven t

syste mwit

h a9 5 percent

efficien t contro l device . Transfe

r operation s are defineda s th e loadin g o f liqui dproduct s that

are o n th e lis t

o f organi c HAP s from atransfe r rac k int o atan k truc k o r railcar . The transfe

r provision s d o no t appl y t o th e loadin g o f

liqui d organi c HAP s a

t a n operatin g pressur

e i n exces s o f

204. 9 kP a(27. 9 psia) ; loadin g o f

marin e vessels ; rack s loadin g liqui dorgani c HAP s onl y a s impuritie s ; o r

rack s loadin g liqui d organi c HAP s i f emission s ar

e returne dt o astorag e vesse l i n avapo r balancin g system . Th e transfe

r provision s requir

e contro l o f

transfer rack s to achiev e 9 8 percent organi c HA P reductio n o r

a n outle t concentratio n o f

2 0 ppmv . Combustio n device s o r produc t recover y device s ma

y b e use d t o comply wit

h thi s requirement . Alternatively , vapo r balancin g system s ma y b e used . 5.2. 2 Petroleu mRefiner

y NESHA P (subpar t CC ) Th e Petroleu mRefiner

y NESHA P applie s t o petroleu mrefining units , al l gasolin e loadin g rack s classifie d under Standar dIndustria

l Classificatio n (SIC ) code 2911 , al l marin e vessel s loadin g operation s locate d a t petroleumrefinery , an dal l storag e vessel s andequipment leak s associate d wit

h abul k gasolin e termina

l o r pipelin e breakout

statio n unde

r SI C cod e 291 1 locate d withi n acontiguou s are aandunde r commo n contro l with- arefinery . 5- 9 

# ST -P.3 9



### DRAF T 3/19/9 8
Ne w storag e tank s ar

e require dto hav e floating roof s with primar

y an dsecondar

y seal s i f th e tan k fits either o f th e tw o followin g scenarios : (1 ) tank capacit y >40,00 0 gallons , TV P >0. 5 psia , an d HAP liqui d concentratio n >2% ; o r (2 ) tank capacit y >20,00 0 gallon s and<40,00 0 gallons , TV P >11. 1 psia , an d HAP liqui dconcentratio n >2% . Fo r gasolin e loadin g racks , i f

th e SIC cod

e i s 2911 , o r

th e loadin g rac k

i s contiguou s an d under commo n control , the n th e facilit y mus t compl y wit h th e Gasolin e Distributio n NESHA P (subpar t R) . Loadin g operation s into marin e vessel s a t refiner y facilitie s mus t

comply wit

h th e Marin e Vesse l Loadin g NESHAP (subpar t Y) . 5.2. 3 Oil/Natura

l Ga s Distribution/Transmissio n NESHA P (subpart s HH,HHH ) Example s o f

facilitie s include , bu t

ar e no t limite dto , wel l sites , satellite tan k batteries , central tank

batteries , grade d pa d sites , andnatura l ga s processin g plants . A facilit y typicall y i s (1 ) anatural ga s compressor statio n tha

t receive s natura

l ga s vi apipelin e froman undergroun d natura l ga s storag e operation , from acondensat e tan k battery , or

from anatura

l ga s processin g plant ; o r (2 ) an undergroun d natural ga s storag e operation . Facilitie s involve di n th e organi c liquid s distributio n (non-gasoline ) secto r o f th e petroleumindustr

y includ e (but

are no t limite d to ) gatherin g stations , trunk-lin e stations , an dstatio n storag e vesse l farms . Th e EP A i s t o definin g th e Organi c Liquid s Distributio n (Non-Gasoline ) sourc e categor y a s includin g thos e facilitie s tha t distribute hydrocarbo n liquid s afte r th e point o f custod y transfer . Fro mth e languag e i n thes e propose d rule s andpreamble , th e organi c liquid s distributio n categor y wil l hav e t o accoun

t for some o f th e facilitie s tha

t hav e arelationshi p t o th e operation s covere d b y Subpart s H

H an d HHH . 5.2. 4 Gasolin e Distributio n NESHA P (subpar t R ) Subpar t Rapplie s t o bul k

gasolin e terminal s andpipelin e breakou t station s tha

t are par t o f amajo r sourc e a s defined i n sectio n 11 2 o f th e Act . A bulk

gasolin e termina

l or pipelin e breakou t statio n wit

h SI C code 291 1 i s subject

t o thi s rule . Th e emission s t o th e atmospher e fro mth e vapor

collectio n an dprocessin g system s du e t o th e loadin g o f

gasolin e carg o tank s mus t

no t excee da1 0 mg/

L emissio n limit . Th e storag e vesse l requirement s ar

e simila r t o 4 0 CF R6 0 subpar

t K b requirements . 5.2. 5 Benzene Emission s fromStorag e Vessel s NESHAP (4 0 CF R6 1 subpar

t Y ) 4 0 CF R61 , subpar

t Y applie s t o storag e vessel s that stor e benzen e havin g aspecifi c gravit y withi n aspecifie d range . A designate dsourc e i s subjec t thi s rul e a s wel l a s t o th e 5-1 0 

# 5 SP.4 0



### DRAFT 3/19/9 8 provision s o f

4 0 CFR60 , subpar

t Kb . Th e provision s o

f thi s rul e specif

y tha t adesignate d sourc e wit h astorag e capacit

y greate r tha n 10,00 0 gallon s mus t

hav e an internal floating roof , a n externa l floatin g roof

, o r aclose d vent

systemwit

h acontro l device . I f

astorag e vesse l i s equippe d wit

h aclose d vent

systemandacontro l device , th e contro l devic e mus t reduc e inle t benzen e emission s b y a

t leas t 9 5 percent . 5.2. 6 Marin e Vesse l Loadin g NESHAP (4 0 CF R6 3 subpar

t Y ) 4 0 CF R6 3 subpar

t Y applie s t o marin e vesse l loading operation s tha t ar e par t o f amajo r sourc e a s define d i n sectio n 11 2 o f th e Act . Th e provision s apply t o commoditie s wit h atru e vapo r pressur e >1. 5 psia , and specif y tha t there mus t

b e ship-to-shor

e compatibility , vapo r

tigh t connections , an d avapor

collectio n system . Ne w andexistin g facilitie s mus t reduc e HA

P emission s afte

r vapo r collectio n b y 98 % and97 % b y weight , respectively . 5.2. 7 Benzen e Wast

e Operation s NESHAP (subpar t FF ) Th e provision s o f

thi s NESHAP apply t o chemica l manufacturing plants , coke by-produc t recover y plant s an d petroleu mrefinerie s at whic h th e tota

l annua l benzen e quantit

y fromth e facilit y wast e i s greater

tha n 1 0 megagram s pe r

year . Eac h tan

k i n whic h th e wast e strea

mo f water conten t les s than 1 0 percent

i s place dmus t

maintai n afixed-roof, closed-ven t syste man d acontro l devic e wit

h emissio n reductio n a

t 9 5 percent . 5.2. 8 Benzen e Transfe

r Operation s NESHAP (subpar t BB ) Th e affecte d facilit

y t o whic h thi s subpar

t applie s i s th e total o f

al l loadin g rack s a

t whic h benzen e an y liqui d containin g 7 0 percen t benzen e i s loade dinto tan

k trucks , railcars , o r

marin e vessel s at eac h benzen e productio n facilit y an deac h bulk

terminal . Dedicate dloadin g rack s at whic h benzene-lade n waste , gasoline , crud e oil , natura l gas , o r petroleu mdistillate s are loade d are exempt . Eac h loadin g rack mus t b e equippe dwit

h avapor collectio n syste mfromwhic h th e collecte d vapor s are route d to acontro l devic e t o reduc e th e emissio n b y 9 8 percen t b y weight . 5.2. 9 Oil-Wate

r Separator NESHAP (subpar

t VV ) Th e Oil-Water

Separator NESHAP regulate s th e ai

r emission s froman oil-water separator o r organi c wate r

separator fo r whic h anothe

r subpar t o f 4 0 CF Rpart s 60,61 , o r

6 3 reference s th e us e o f thi s subpar

t fo r such air emissio n control . Th e provision s apply t o separator s that hav e fixed roofs , floatin g roofs , or separator s vente dt o acontro l devic e to reduc e th e emission s b y 9 5 percent b y weight .
5-1 1



# 3 ^P.4 1



### DRAF T 3/19/9 8 5.2.1 0 Storag e Vesse l NESHA P (subpar t WW ) Th e Storag e Vesse l NESHAP regulate s air emission s fromstorag e vessel s fo r whic h anothe r subpar t o f 4 0 CF Rpart s 60,61 , or

6 3 reference s th e us e o f

thi s subpar

t for suc h ai r emissio n control . Th e provision s appl y t o storag e vessel s usin g interna l or externa l floatin g roofs , o r close d vent s system s and aflar e o r other contro l device . Th e provision s als o appl y t o pressurize d storag e vessels . 5.2.1 1 Miscellaneou s Organi c NESHA P (MON ) Wit h th e promulgatio n of

th e Miscellaneou s Organi c NESHAP b y th e yea r 2000 , th e EP A intend s t o propos e asingl e se t of emissio n standard s tha

t wil l apply t o mor

e tha n 2 0 liste d sourc e categorie s o f

HAP . Industrie s wit

h SI C cod e 2 8 wil l b e affectedb y thi s regulation , a s wil l b e organi c chemical processe s describe db y SI C code s 282,284,285,286,287,289 , an d 386 . Th e rul e wil l affect

facilitie s tha

t us e batch organi c processes . Th e MO N wil l cover

sourc e categorie s including : chlorinate dparaffin s production , carbony l sulfide production , explosive s production , hydrazin e production , photographi c chemical s production , and rubber chemical s production . I t

wil l als o cove

r proces s vent s fo

r batc h reactor s use d i n producin g organi c chemical s liste di n Tabl e 1 o f 4 0 CF RPar t 6 3 Subpar

t F (Hazardou s Organi c NESHAP) , andHA P emission s fromsyntheti c organi c manufacturin g industr y (SOCMI ) processe s usin g HA P onl y a s asolvent . Furthermore , th e MO N wil l cove r th e productio n o f

pesticid e intermediate s no t covere db y th e Agricultura l Chemical s NESHAP , an d productio n o f

by-products , co-product s andintermediate s no t considere dprimar

y product s unde r th e NESHAP fo

r Grou p I an d Grou

p I V polymer s an dresins . I n addition , th e MO N wil l cover thos e produc t

processe s identifie d b y th e EP A base dupo n informatio n gathere dwhic h include s alcohols , oi l additives , etc. , and othe r product processe s no t

identifie db y an

y other MAC T standard . 5. 3 State/Loca l Regulation s Th e lis t o f State an d loca

l regulation s that

apply t o emissio n source s tha t occur i n th e organi c liquid s distributio n industr y wa s discusse dearlier

an di s discusse di n more detai l i n Attachmen

t 2-Summar y o f

State/Loca

l Regulations .

5-1 2 

# 4 DP.4 2



### DRAF T 3/19/9 8 6.0 % SUMMAR

Y OF ISSUE S AN

D NEX T STEP S 6. 1 Issue s i n th e NESHA P Developmen t Th e EPA projec t

tea mha s identifie dsevera

l issue s that

nee dt o b e addresse ddurin g th e standard s development

process . Th e mos t

significan t issue s center

aroun dth e definitio n o f

th e OL D industry , and th e specifi c facilities , operations , an dliquid s tha t nee dt o b e covere db y th e standards . Some o f

th e ke y issue s are discusse dbelo w (se e als o Attachment 1 , page s 2 9 an d 30) . Th e remainder

o f thi s sectio n briefly addresse s th e nex t step s i n th e regulator

y process . Industry definition. Th e current definitio n o f

thi s sourc e categor

y include s stand-alon e o r separate distributio n operation s (i.e. , no t collocate dwit

h achemica

l manufacture

r o r apetroleu m refinery) , whic h ma

y consis t either o f abul k liqui dtermina

l o r apipelin e facility . In contras t t o terminals , pipelin e facilitie s exis t alon g apipeline , receivin g produc t andreturnin g i t

t o th e same pipeline . Th e issu e concern s whethe r ther e ar e collocate ddistributio n operation s tha t shoul db e include d i n thi s sourc e category , an dwhethe r there are additiona

l type s o f facilitie s or

operation s no t alread y considere d tha

t shoul d b e include di n th e category . Thes e additiona l facilitie s ma

y b e either stand-alon e or

collocate d wit

h afacilit y whos e primar

y function i s no t

liqui ddistribution . Impact of existing rules. Severa

l Federa l NESHAP standard s hav e been promulgate d o r are under developmen

t (se e Sectio n 5.1 ) tha

t affec t th e manufactur

e an dhandlin g o f

HAP

containin g organi c liquids . A continue dfocu s i s t o investigate liqui ddistributio n activitie s no t alread y regulate d o r

planne d fo

r regulatio n unde

r thes e other

standards . Conversely , w e wis h t o avoi d duplicatin g an

y MAC T requirement s alread y i n effec t o r planne dfo

r source s i n thi s o r simila r industries . Example s are distribution , storage , andhandlin g operation s a t refinerie s an d chemical plants . Major/area source determination. A determinatio n o f th e number

o f majo r source s i n th e categor y ha s no t bee n made . Du e t o th e larg e numbe r o f are asources , th e projec t

tea mwil l nee d t o investigate ho w t o define ou t o f th e rul e a s man

y are asource s a s possibl e t o lessen th e nee d fo r permittin g o f

are asources . Also , are asource s wil l hav e t o b e analyze dandaregulator y determinatio n wil l hav e t

o b e made , sinc e §112(c)(3 ) o f th e Act require s tha

t are asource s b e regulate d i f

they present

" athrea t o f advers e effects t o huma

n healt h o r th e environment. " Additional

data gathering. Dat agatherin g fo r th e P-MAC T developmen

t an dfo r th e eventua l development

o f th e NESHAP ha s produce duseful information , but additiona l dat aare neede d t o full

y define th e industr

y andperfor

mth e analyse s t o suppor

t emissio n standards . 6- 1 

# 4-1P.4 3



### DRAF T 3/19/9 8 Thes e analyse s wil l includ e option s fo r industr y subcategorization , model plan t development , baselin e emission s estimates , MAC T contro l level s determination , andcontro l technolog y assessments . Th e projec t

tea mexpect s th e industr

y surve y andcontinue dcontact s wit h th e Wor k Tea mt o b e usefu l i n providin g thi s information . 6. 2 Nex tStep s Revie w o f existin g regulations , plan t

visits , andRoundtabl e meeting s wit h industr y and Stat e representative s wil l b e use d to bette r define th e sourc e categor

y andit s affectedsources , an d t o addres s other

regulator y and technica

l issues . Result s fromth e industr

y surve y wil l b e analyze dfo

r th e purpos e o f

performin g th e analyse s neede d t o develo p an d suppor t MAC T standard s fo

r thi s category . Th e EP

A projec t tea mwil l continu e t o collec t

dat aandinformatio n i n orde r t o refin e th e industr

y profil e an d defin e th e facilit

y type s an d emissio n source s that nee dt o b e include dunder

th e MAC T standards . Additiona

l site visit s wil l b e mad e wit h th e purpos e o f

gatherin g furthe

r informatio n an d understandin g th e rang e o f facilit y types . Th e projec t

tea mwil l b e meetin g wit

h th e industr

y an d regulator

y stakeholder s a s necessar

y t o discus s issue s i n thi s rul e development . A majo r projec t mileston e andwor

k effor t wil l b e th e analysi s an dsummar y o f response s t o th e industr

y survey . Thi s analysi s i s expecte dt o occu r i n th e summe

r o f 1998 . Th e development

o f MAC T floor s and drafting o f arul e proposa

l wil l follo w thi s analysi s effort .



### 6-2 

## 4-2 -P.4 4



### DRAF T 3/19/9 8
7. 0 REFERENCE S

1 . U.S . Environmental Protectio n Agency . 1992 . Documentatio n fo r Developin g th e Initial Sourc e Categor

y List-Fina l Report . OAQPS , Researc h Triangl e Park , Nort h Carolina . 2 . 1997ILT A Directory , Independent Liqui dTerminal s Association . Washington , D.C . 3 . Kennedy , Joh n L . 1993 . Oi l andGa s Pipelin e Fundamentals . 2ndEdition . PennWel l Publishin g Company , Tulsa , Oklahoma . Page s 28-33,37-40 . 4 . Office ofManagemen t and Budget . 1987 . Standar dIndustria

l Classificatio n Manual . National Technical Informatio n Service , Springfield , Virginia . 5 . 199 7 NAC D Directory , National Associatio n o f Chemica l Distributors . Arlington , Virginia . 6 . Letter

fromYoung , Priscill aJ. , America n Petroleu mInstitute , t o Bruc e Jordan , U.S . EPA/ESD . Ma

y 24,1995 . RE : Removin g th e Crud e Oi l Transportatio n Secto r fromth e National Emissio n Standard s fo r Hazardou s Air

Pollutant s fo

r Oil & Natural Ga s Productio n Facilities .

7- 1



# 4~ 3P.4 5

Attachmen t1 

## PRESUMPTIV E MAC T FO R ORGANI C LIQUID S DISTRIBUTIO N (NON-GASOLINE ) FACILITIE S

REVISE D EP A PRESENTATIO

N FRO M FIRS T ROUNDTABL

E MEETIN

G

Wast e an d Chemica

l Processes Grou

p Offic e of Ai r Qualit

y Planning an

d Standard

s U.S . Environmenta

l Protection Agenc

y Researc h Triangle Park , NC

& 

# if\ 

# ft 1

4 & ^ ° ;* •P.4 6



# OVERVIE

W Standard s Developmen tProces s Presumptiv e MAC T • MAC T • Projec tSchedul e 

# Affecte d Source s

• Definitio n o f

Sourc e Category • Industr y Profil e • Mode l Plants/Facilitie s 

# Emission s an d Control s

• HA P Emission s • Emissio n Control s Curren tContro l Level s (MAC T Floors ) 

# Issues/Question s

2

4 ^P.4 7



# STANDARD S DEVELOPMEN T

PROCES S

3 

# 4 ^P.4 8



# PRESUMPTIV

E MAC T IS.. . [MAC T = maximu m achievabl e contro l technology ] 

# A n estimat

e o f whatMACT woul d be , base d o n a review o f currently available informatio n Assists Stat

e and loca l agencies i n making case by-cas e MAC T determinations No ta regulatio n - offere

d only fo r guidance an d informatio n A startin g poin tfor the MAC T standard developmentproces s

4



# A ©P.4 9



# STATUTOR

Y REQUIREMENTS Promulgatio n o

f nationa l emission standard s fo r hazardous ai r pollutant s (NESHAP) fo r liste d source categorie s i s require d unde r §112(d ) of th e Clea n Ai r Act Organi c Liquid s Distributio n (Non-Gasoline ) i s a liste d majo r sourc e categor y unde r §112(c ) [Federa l Register , 5 7 FR31576 , Jul y 16,1992 ] Promulgatio n of

standard s i s require d b y Novembe r 200 0

5P.5 0



# STATUTOR

Y REQUIREMENT S (2 ) "Majo r Source " means an y stationar

y sourc e o r grou p of stationar y source s locate d withi n a contiguou s are

a an d unde r commo

n contro l tha t emit s o r has th e potentia

l t o emit, considerin g controls , i n th e aggregate , 1 0 ton s pe r yea r o f an y hazardou s ai r pollutant(HAP) o r 2 5 ton s pe r yea r o f an y combination of

HA P "Are a Source " mean

s an y stationar

y HA P sourc e tha ti s no ta majo r source "Ne w Source " mean

s a stationar

y source , th e constructio n o r reconstructio n of which i s commenced after th e Administrato r firs tpropose s regulation s under §11 2 establishin g a n emissio n standard applicabl e t

o suc h source "Existin g Source " mean

s an y stationar

y sourc e othe r tha n a ne w sourc e



# g oP.5 1 I 

# 1


# STATUTOR

Y REQUIREMENT S (3 ) Minimu m leve l o f

standard s ("MAC T floor")

• Fo r existing sources, th e standard shal l b e at leas ta s stringenta

s th e averag e emissio n limitatio n achieved b y th e bes tperformin g 1 2 percen tof

existin g sources , or , i n th e cas e o f categorie s wit

h les s tha n 3 0 sources , th e averag e emissio n limitatio n achieve d b y th e bes tperformin g 5 sources

• Fo r new sources, th e standard shal l b e a tleas t a s stringenta

s th e emission contro l achieve d in practic e b y th e bes tcontrolle d simila r source

^ \P.5 2



# CURREN T PROJECT SCHEDUL

E Even tPat e Kickof f Meeting s Plan tVisit s Septembe r 24-25,199 7 Dec . 1997 - Apr . 199 8 Initia l Roundtabl e (Wor k Team ) January 21,199 8 Secon d Roundtabl e (discus s draf

tP-MACT ) Marc h 24,199 8 Thir d Roundtabl e (revie w final P-MACT , i f needed )

Rul e Proposa l Rul e Promulgatio n May 20,199 8 Issu e P-MAC T Repor tJun e 199 8 Continu e o n Standard s Developmen tProces s Jul y 199 8 Septembe r 199 9 Novembe r 200 0

8 

# a 2 -P.5 3



# AFFECTE

D SOURCE

S

5 3P.5 4



# HO W I S TH E SOURC E CATEGORY

DEFINED ? Initia l Sourc e Categor y Description : Activitie s associate d with th e storag e an d distributio n o f non gasolin e organi c liquid s with HA P content , atsite s tha tserv e a s distributio n point s from which organi c liquid s ma y b e obtaine d fo r furthe r us e an d processing . Fro m th e oi l an d ga s productio n rul e proposal , include s petroleu m facilitie s tha thandl e an d distribute hydrocarbo n liquid s afte r th e poin to f

custod y transfer . 

# Facilit y Type s Include :

• Stand-alon e o r separate distributio n terminal s

• Collocate d distributio n activitie s (i.e. , associate d with refinerie s o r chemical plants )

• Compounding/blending/packagin g plant s

- separat e facilitie s [no tcovere d unde r Miscellaneou s Organi c NESHA P (MON) ]

- collocated wit

h stand-alon

e o r collocated distribution activities

• Pipelin e facilitie s (non-gasolin e HA P liquids )

1 0 

# 5 ^P.5 5



# Organi c Liquid s Distributio n Facilitie s Industr

y CHEMICAL S
Chemica l Manufacturin g (SOCMI )

Consume r (Retail ) Packaging/Distributio n Facilit y 

# PETROLEU M
Domesti c Oil/Ga s Productio n

Petrochemica l Manufacturin g Foreig n Crud e Oi l

Petroleu m Refinin g 

# i Facilitie s usin g chemical s a s feedstocks
Consume r (Retail ) 

# I Consume r (Retail ) Packaging/ Distributio n Facilit y Packaging / Distributio n Facility

Intermediat e Storag e Facilit y 

## 1 1



# 5 5P.5 6


# HO W I S TH E SOURC

E CATEGOR

Y DEFINED ? (2 ) Whic h processe s an

d equipmen

tar e covered ?

• All HA

P emissio n source s a tdistribution facilities • Possibl e sources :

- Storage tank

s

- Liqui d transfer

- truc k

- railcar

- pipeline

- Equipmen

tleak s

- Wastewater collectio

n an d treatmen

t(ai r emission aspects ) 

# Whic h liquids ? Syntheti c organic HA

P chemicals Petrochemicals Crude oil o r other unrefine d petroleu m liquids Refine d petroleu m (non-gasoline) Other liquids wit

h volatil e HA

P conten t(e.g. , waste s an

d wastewater

)

1 2

## INDUSTR Y PROFILE-BASE D O

N SI C CODE S

J . Majo r Group

t- , >;4iXx, X

- \ Industr

y Grou p Numbe r

x 4610

' 4780 SI C

Code*

V- - -"

• * - • **S
• f *•. . 461 2 461 3 461 9

* *' " " •*
_
478 9 NAIC S Cod e

"""• X H ' s 4861 1 4869 1 4869 9

' J***
48899 9 Facility Type *

PIPELINE S \' -'' $}j&\n&>lfaf^tl&Utfr\'Q$&', ; / Pipelines, Except

Natural Gas Crud e Petroleu m Pipeline s Refined Petroleu m Pipeline s Pipelines , No tElsewher e Classifie d '';- ; \< „ ^)ransport8^o»$eryic« « '/' •/ Miscellaneous Services Incidental to Transportation Transp . Services , No tElsewher e Classifie d Tota l No . o f Establishments' *

v % • . -f ' ' *******'- ' ** 838

59 *\ * ** * * ** * * 2,349 Siz e Distributio n

b y No . o f Employees' * <5 0 >5 0 >10 0

V *•.<, •••

_*• 93%

100% k "\:.^ * 92% * *

4%

jf ** * * * 5% \ . 3%

s ^ < 3%



## 1 3

## INDUSTR Y PROFILE-BASED O

N SI C CODES (CONTINUED) Majo r Group

- ,
^ ' '•-,' , /•„•

- , » J. » ' .. ' . „

'
__" »' f

• Industr

y Group Numbe r

• * *** *", ', ',** s ** 4220

4490

5V . sv 5160

5170 SI C

Code*

\* f * * * *. ** *" / * * ^''•'••M* :*****> **'Sy*
422 6

449 1 * . * *. * *-•**- y

, s /'

... '' .* y 516 9

517 1 517 2 NAIC S

Cod e

s' '//f, ', "f, 4931 9

*' '*' *** ** *** , y 48831/ 2

4226 9

45431 1 4227 2 Facility Type *

STAND-ALONE TERMINAL S

•* * ** *****, ** • ' ' ****', * s^r*Ss*,y y + ft *y / ' // ' Public Warehousing and Storage Special Warehousin g an d Storage , No t Elsewher e Classifie d

" '< - ; ' > 'Waf6t^_*aW*p&Mtioti'';' , ?' ' . ' * * * *.* * ' * * *"* r '' * Services Incidental

to WaterTransportation Marin e Carg o Handlin g
* , , * * * * * f Chemicals and

Allied Products Chemical s and Allie d Products , No t Elsewher e Classifie d Petroleum and

Petroleum Products Petroleu m Bul k Station s an d Terminal s Petroleu m & Petroleu m Products Wholesalers , excep tBul k Station s an d

Terminal s Tota l No . o f Establishments "

'''•-, "'{' if*
*f , f

w ********+ ** m ** m */ 1,479
6,742 85 4 14,436 10,69 5 14,636 10,56 2 3,86 4 Siz e Distributio n

b y No . o f Employees' * <5 0 >5 0 >10 0

. * /r* "****
*• , i , ***> * ******

• * ** 93 %

,„_„,•„•'••- • 95% 78 %
97% 97 % 97% 97 % 97 % 4 %

_\ ' ', 2% 10 %
2% 2 % 2% 3 % 2 % ''' '
3 %

S **•. : 3% 12 % * **** * * 1% 1 % 1% <1 % 1 %



## 1 4

## J]



## - 0 Majo r Group



### i \

- * * Si - . .

"' - -'-V . < 

## INDUSTR

Y PROFILE-BASED O

N SI C CODE S (CONTINUED ) Industry Group Numbe r SI C

Code * NAIC S

Cod e Facility Type * Tota l No . o f Establishments' *

COMPOUNDIN G AN D PACKAGIN G FACILITIE S ^ 5160

5170

' - i 4780 "

' * 516 9

517 1 517 2

t " ''<s' f ' *f ** ** ** * **
478 3 v - * " 4226 9

45431 1 4227 2

48899 1 5 ; " •' ; " '

— '""- , • Y Wb<>le_^6TiFad^N<_todttra1jleG6__i » Chemicals and

Allied Products Chemical s an d Allie d Products , No t Elsewher e Classifie d Petroleum and

Petroleum Products Petroleu m Bul k Station s an d Terminal s Petroleu m & Petroleu m Product s Wholesalers , excep tBul k Station s an d

Terminal s

' > ,' s " ' ^' i' A / , ' , , , Miscellaneous Services Incidental to Transportation Packin g an d Cratin g v . '• . • . t . /

, . 14,436 10,69 5 14,636 10,56 2 3,86 4

•:'•.' . i '

f t 2,349 Siz e Distributio n

b y No . o f Employees' * <5 0 >5 0 >10 0

97% 97 % 97% 97 % 97 %

' * 

## * ' V 92 % s • •

2 % 2 % 2 % 3 % 2 %

* - * •.* 5% 1% 1 % 1% <1 % 1 %

**- • 2 %



# 1 5

## INDUSTR Y PROFILE-BASED O

N SI C CODE S (CONCLUDED) Majo r Group Industry

Grou p Numbe r SI C

Code 8 

### NAIC S

Cod e Facility Type " Tota l No . o f Establishments 1 

### * Siz e Distributio n b y No . o f Employees b <5 0 >5 0 >10 0 COLLOCATE D DISTRIBUTIO N FACILITIE S (e.g. , wit h chemica l o r petrochemica l facilities) *

' 51 ' *; ' 516 0 ****. _/•.. 516 9 *"s ' *s s
4226 9 WMeSat e Tri'd^'di_dnrat)ie'Godd$ '

*r ** Chemical s and Allie d Product s Chemicals an

d Allie d Products , No t Elsewher e Classified 14,43 6 10,69 5 * "*

% "•****• 97 % 97 % \ -'-,'s- - .

2% 2 % . . . fs'

- 1 % 1 % 

# 0 0 "Standard

Industrial

Classification Manual, 198 7 (Offic e ofManagemen tan d Budget ) b 

### Counfy Business Patterns, 199 5 (Burea u o f th e Census ) Note : Thi s tabl e i s no tye tcomplete ; th e projec tteam i s stil l evaluatin g thes e facilities . Dependin g upo n th e outcom e o f

thes e evaluations , som e SI C code s may b e adde d t o o r delete d fro m this tabl e a ta late r poin ti n time .



## 1 6P.6 1



# INDUSTR

Y PROFILE (2 ) Mode l Industr y Stand-Alon e Organi c Liqui d Facilities 1 

## Primar y SI C codes : 4226,5169,517 1

• Primar

y State s b y Tota l Storag e Capacity : Stat e Texa s Louisiana Ne w Jerse y California Illinoi s Capacit

y (barrels ) 55,582,440 29,383,594 29,252,30 3 24,329,88 8 9,881,57 7 Rang e in numbe

r o f storag e tanks : 1 t o 42 0 + Percen to f Tota l 21 % 11 % 11 % 9 % 4 %
Rang e in tota l storage capacit

y of individua l facilities : 2,700 t

o 12,500,000 barrel s Mode s o f transportation

- marin e vessel (tanker ship , barge)

- tank truc

k

- railcar

- pipeline
'Base d o n membershi p i n th e Independen tLiqui d Terminal s Associatio n (ILTA) . 

## 1 7 6 M

# INDUSTR Y PROFILE (3 )
Collocate d Organi c Liqui d Facilitie s (e.g. , associate d wit h petroleu m refinerie s o r chemica l plants )

• SI C code

s probabl y no tsimila r t o stand-alone facilitie s • Mode

l plan tdat a stil l bein g collecte d Pipelin e Facilitie s Primar y SIC codes : 4612,461 3 • Mode

l plan tdat a stil l being collecte

d Blending/Compounding/Packagin g Facilitie s Primar y SI C codes : 5169,5171,517 2 • Probabl

y exis ta s par to f liqui d termina

l operations • Stand-alon

e facilities ma

y no tb e major sources • Som e majo r sourc e facilities an

d collocated sites ma

y b e covered unde

r th e Miscellaneou

s Organic NESHA

P (MON ) • Mode

l plan tdat a stil l being collecte

d

1 8P.6 3



# EMISSION S AN

D CONTROL S

1 9P.6 4



# EMISSIO N FACTOR

S Emission s Calculations

- HA P conten t

- Models/method s fo r estimatin g emission s

- Parameters : volume , loadin g method , vapo r pressure , etc. ) 

# HAP Content

- pur e compoun d (100 % HAP )

- mixture s (partia l HA P content )

- petroleu m liquid s

- dilute d pur e HA P chemical

s

- propertie s o f severa l HA P liquid s ar e show n i n Table s 1 an d 2

2 0

## TABL E 1 . ORGANI C LIQUID S WIT H HA P CONTEN T
Stored Liquid

" ;- Asphalt Aviatio n Gasolin e Alkylat e Crude Oil Diesel/Distillat

e Gasolin e Heav y Ga s Oi l Je tFuel (JP-4 ) JetKerosene Naphth a Reformates Residua l Fue l Oil Recovered Slo p Oi l Tru e Vapo r

Pressure

0.00 2 3.5 0 4.9 2 3.4 2 0.07 6.47 0.0 8 1.2 2 0.07 3.1 9 3.4 8 0.07 1.46 Temp .

° F Annua

l Volum e HA P Concentratio n i n

Vapor s (g/m 3 ) Rang e Averag e

'.••:•: ••; . ^ . - , , T ,. . MixtutesCOBtaffttinjg;ISAl"' 6 ^. s ; - ' - - 28 0 66. 8 7 6 8 6 7 2 6 9 10 4 6 8 7 4 7 2 7 2 14 4 14 5 ?

7 7 2.64xl0 u gal/y r 7.13xl0 1 0 gal/y r 1.18xl0 u gal/y r 7 7 7.60xl0 8 gal/y r 7 7 1.65xl0 1 0 gaVy

r 7 7

7 9 • 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 31.7 2

15.5 1 115.7 7 52.0 9 11.5 5 130.6 6 24.7 5 73.2 0 8. 5 92.5 0 91.1 6 11 0 52.7 5 Numbe r o f

Data Points

* *
_ • '*,;* , ' . *

• . *. % **y v s . % 1 4 1 6 2 8 7 4 7 4 13 7 3 8 2 4 4 5 7 0 5 3 3 7 4 0 See end o f tabl e for footnotes .



## 2 1

## TABL E 1 . ORGANIC LIQUIDS WIT H HA P CONTEN

T (Continued )

0 Store d Liqui d Tru e Vapo r Pressure Temp .

° F Annua

l Volume HA P Concentratio n i n

Vapor s (g/m 3 ) Range Averag e Numbe r o f Data Points



## • J 

## V „ :-.>/. - :ftl^^t:^Z>* w**?^ -'./i^r^f^ Acrylonitril e Anilin e Benzene Bisphenol- A Bi s (2-ethylhexyl ) phthalat e 1 3 Butadien e Caprolacta

m Chlorofor m Cumen e Ethylbenzene Ethylene glyco l Ethylene dichlorid e Ethylene oxid e Formaldehyd e 37 % Isophoron e Malei c anhydrid e 1.7 1 0.0 2 1.54 n/ a 7 36.0 5 0.9 7 0.1 9 0.27 0.1 9 0.0 0 1.2 5 14. 7 7 0.0 7 0.77 7 0

9 5 7 0 n/ a 7 7 0 35 6 5 0 7 0 7 9 7 0 7 0 5 1 7 7 0 5 3 3,300x10 s lb/y r 1,305x10 * lb/y r 1,740x10s lb/y r 1,600x10 * lb/y r 257x10 * lb/y r 3,700x10 * lb/y r 1,800x10 * lb/y r 935x10 * lb/y r 5,240x10 * lb/y r 13,040x10 * lb/y r 5,600x10 * lb/y r 19,600x10 * lb/y r 6,500x10 * lb/y r 7,900x10 * lb/y r 7 490x10 * lb/y r 7

7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7

? 7 7 7 • 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 9 • 7 7 n/a d n/ a n/ a n/ a n/ a n/ a n/ a n/ a n/ a n/ a n/ a n/ a n/ a n/ a n/ a n/ a Se e end o f

tabl e fo r footnotes . 

## 2 2

## TABL E 1 . Stored Liqui

d

MTB E Methano l Methylchlorofor

m Methylene chloride Methy l methacrylat

e Methy l ethyl keton

e Methy l isobuty l keton e Perchloroethylene Pheno l Phthali c anhydrid

e Styrene Toluene Vinyl acetat

e Vinyl chloride o-xylen e p-xylen e 

## ORGANIC LIQUID S WITH HA P CONTENT (Continued ) Tru e Vapo r Pressur e 4.7 4 1.93 1.9 7.3 9 0.6 2 1.46 0.0 4 0.3 6 0.0 1 0.1 9 0.1 9 0.4 5 1.8 7 14.7 0.1 0 0.1 4 Temp .

° F
7 0 7 0 6 8 7 0 7 5 7 0 7 0 7 7 7 0 5 0 9 3 7 0 7 0 6. 8 7 0 7 0 Annua

l Volume
8,140x10 * lb/y r 11,100x10 * lb/y r 335x10 * lb/y r 375x10 * lb/y r 1,372x10 6 lb/y r 584x10 * lb/y r 9 • 4,100x10 * lb/y r 4,100x10 * lb/y r 820x10 * lb/y r 7,622x10 * lb/y r 698x10 * lb/y r 2,112x10 * lb/y r 9,463x10 * lb/y r 675x10 * lb/y r 4,779x10 * lb/y r HA P Concentratio n in Vapors (g/m 1 ) Rang e 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 ? 7 ? 9 9 7 7 7 7 Averag e

7 7 7 7 7 7 ? 7 7 7 9 • ? 7 7 7 7 Numbe r o f

Dat a Point s n/ a n/ a n/ a n/ a n/ a n/ a n/ a n/ a n/ a n/ a n/ a n/ a n/ a n/ a n/ a n/ a 'Industr y surve y result s for th e Petroleu m Refinerie s NESHAP , prepare d b y Radia n Corporation , Augus t10,1993 . "Chemica l an d Engineering News , Jun e 1996 , an d Chemcyclopedi a 1996 ; al l annual volume s ar e base d upo n 199 5 data . Methylen e chlorid e an

d methylchlorofor

m annual volume s ar e based upo n 199 4 data . 'Nationa l Petroleu m News , Mid-Jun e 1995 . dn/ a stands for no tapplicable . 

## 2 3P.6 8



# EMISSION FACTOR

S (2 )

• Model s an d Method s

- Storage tank

s

- AP-42 , Sectio

n 7. 1 (TANKS3 software

)

- Liqui d transfer

- AP-42 , Sectio

n 5.2

- Equipmen

tleak s

- emission factor

s availabl e for chemica

l production facilities

- factor s fo r petroleu m refinerie

s

- factor s fo r gasoline marketin

g operation

s

- Wastewate r air emission s

- collection an

d treatmen

tsyste m mode l (Water 8 )

• Facilit y Parameter s (establishe d a s par to f th e mode l industry )

2 4 G>9>P.6 9



# EMISSIO N CONTROL S Storage Vessel s • Rout e vapor s to contro l devic e

- oxidize r (therma l o r catalytic ) <98% controt>

- carbo n adsorptio

n <95% controt> -flare <98%control>

- condense r <95% control>

- scrubbe r <95% controt> • Floatin g roo f

(internal o r external )

- ri m sea l type s an d fittin g control s • Pressurize d o r refrigerate d tank s Liqui d Transfer/Loadin g • Rout e vapor s t o contro l devic e

- device s simila r t o storag e vesse l control s • Vapor-tigh tvessel s (trucks , railcars ) • Vapo r balancin g Equipmen tLeak s • Modif

y o r replac e existin g equipmen t • Lea k detectio n and repai r (LDAR ) progra m (instrumen to r visual program ) Wastewate r • Ven tt o a contro l devic e • Floatin g roo f

o r vapor-tigh tcove r • Close d pipin g • Drai n control s (p-traps , wate r seals , etc. )


## 2 5P.7 0



# CURREN T CONTRO L LEVEL S Informatio n on potentia

l level s o f control i s bein g obtaine d from :

• Federa

l NESHA P (4 0 CF RPar t63) Refiner y NESHA P (subpartCC ) Gasolin e Distributio n NESHA P (subpar tR ) Oil/Natural Ga s Production/Transmissio n (subparts HH , HHH ) [proposed ] Marin e Vesse l Loadin g NESHAP (subpar tY ) Hazardou s Organi c NESHA P (HON ) (subpart s F , G , H , I ) Miscellaneou s Organi c NESHAP (MON ) [pre-proposal ] Storag e Vesse l NESHA P (subpartWW ) [pre-proposal ] Oil-Wate r Separator s (subpartW ) Benzen e Storag e Vessel s (4 0 CF R61 , subpar tY ) Benzen e Waste Operation s NESHA P (4 0 CF R61 , subpar t FF ) Off-Sit e Hazardou s Waste NESHA P (subpar tDD ) Benzen e Transfe r NESHA P (4 0 CF R61 , subpar tBB ) NSP S Rule s (4 0 CF RPar t60 ) • Storag e Vessel s (subpar tKb , etc. ) • Bul k Gasolin e Terminal s (subpartXX )

2 6P.7 1



# CURREN T CONTRO L LEVEL S

(2 )
Industr y Dat a

• Plan tvisit s

- severa l visit s wer e mad e i n Decembe

r 1997 , an d mor e ar e planne d



# • Surve y response s

- detailed survey : • sen tt o a limited numbe

r o f facilities • specific facilit

y types • specific types o

f liquids (cutoff

s fo r vapo r pressur e an d HA P content ) • operation

s no tcovere d b y other MAC

T rules facilit y siz e *50 % o

f 10/2 5 tpy HA P criteria

2 7P.7 2



# CURRENT CONTRO L LEVEL S

(3 ) State/Local Rule s (Examples )

• Storag e Vessel s - Californi a an d Illinoi s rule s amon g th e mos tstringen t tank s > 19,80 0 gallons , > 1.

5 psia , o r tank s > 39,63 0 gallons , > 0. 5 psia : • floatin g roo f o r vapo r contro

l a t95 % by weigh t an y capacity , > 1 1 psia : • pressur e tan k wit h n o detectable organic emissions • pressur e tan k wit h n o detectable organic emissions or vapor contro

l a t95 % b y weight

• 

## Transfe r Operation s -Texas , Alaska , an d Californi a rule s amon g th e mos tstringen t • Organi c liquids : emission

s limit= 0.1 7 lb/1,00 0 gallons (21mg/liter

) (California , Ba

y Area) • > 0.5 psia : vapo r contro l a t90 % (Texas , Houston) • > 1. 5 psia : emissio

n limit= 0.08 lb/1,00 0 gallon s (lOmg/liter

) (Alaska, California, Sout h Coast ) Wastewate r Operation s - Connecticut , Virginia , an d Hawai i rule s amon g th e mos tstringen t • > 200 gallon

s (VOC>1.5 psia)/day : vapo r control a t95 % (Connecticut

, Virginia) • > 200 gallon

s (VOC>0.5 psia)/day : floating roo f tan k (Hawaii) 2 8P.7 3



# ISSUES/QUESTION S Whatfacilities/emissio n sources shoul d b e include d i n th e source category ? Ar e there significantemissio n source s at compoundin g an

d packagin g operations ? Impactof th e othe r Federal ai r rule s

• D o thes e rule s adequatel y cove r (o r wil l the y cover ) collocate d distributio n emissio n sources ? • Whic h emissio n source s i n categorie s tha tar e regulate d (o r wil l b e regulate d unde r othe r rules ) shoul d b e considere d fo r regulatio n unde r th e OL D standards ? 

# Impacton o r fro

m othe r medi a standard s Wate r (Benzen e Wast e NSPS? ) • Soli d wast e • Othe r standards ? • Investigatio n o f

thes e rule s i s continuin g
2 9

# ISSUES/QUESTION S (2 ) Major/Are a Sources

• Som e owners o r operator s ar e smal l businesse s

- investigatin g thes e number s

• Mus tregulate are a source s i f the y presen t " a threa to f

advers e effect

s t o huma n healt h o r th e environment " ( § 112(c)(3) )

• Lookin g int o simpl e mechanism s t o distinguis h the m fro m majo r source s (throughput , equipmen t size , etc. )

• Ho w doe s th e potentia l t o emi t(PTE ) concep t appl y t o thes e operations ? 

# Nee d additiona

l informatio

n t o defin e industr y an d complet e industr y profil e

• Industr y surve y • Completio n o f

data collectio n fo r MAC T floo r determinatio n • HA P conten to f

mixture s

3 0P.7 5

Attachmen t

2 MEMORANDU

M TO : Stev e Shed

d U . S . Environmenta

l Protectio n Agency , ESD/WCP G FROM : Ja

y Helm s Pacifi c Environmenta

l Services , Inc . (PES ) DATE : February 9 , 199 8

P:\N81 2 SUBJECT : Organi c Liquid s Distributio n NESHAP : Stat e Rule s Summar

y Th e followin g i s asummar y o f th e Stat e an d loca l regulation s reviewe db y PES . Th e summar y i s organize d i n term s o f stringenc y o f

regulatio n andgroupe dinto percentages . 

### Storag e Vessel s Lo w vapo r pressur e organi c liquid s storag e (5 1 rules) : To p 12 % - > 19,80 0 gallon s an d > 1. 5 psia ; o r > 39,63 0 gallon s an d > 0. 5 psia ; Mus t hav e afloatin g roo f

o r vapor contro l at

95 % b y weight To p 25 % - > 20,00 0 gallon s an d < 40,00 0 gallon s an d > 4 psia ; o r > 40,000 gallon s and > 0.7 5 psia ; Mus t hav e afloatin g roo f

o r vapor contro l a t 9 5 % b y weigh

t To p 35 % ->40,00 0 gallons ; > 1. 5 psia ; Pressur e tank , floating roof , o r vapo r control-95 % To p 50 % ->40,00 0 gallons ; > 1. 5 psia ; Pressur e tank , floating roof , o r vapo r control-90 % To p 80 % - Miscellaneou s requirement s rangin g i n tank siz e andvapo r

pressur e cutoffs ; Requirement s rang e fromvapo r contro l at 80 % t o floatin g roofs . Hig h vapo r pressur e ( > 11. 0 psia ) organi c liquid s storag e (1 5 rules) : To p 12 % - Pressur e Tank wit h n o detectabl e organi c emission s To p 50 % - Pressur e tank

wit h n o detectabl e organi c emission s o r vapo r control-90 % To p 75 % - Vapo r

control-85 % **A U of th e regulation s reviewe d considere dan y organi c liqui d> 11. 1 psi at o b e a"hig h vapor pressure " o r

"extremel y volatile " liquid . Externa l floating roo f

tank s (1 0 rules) : To p 12 % - > 20,00 0 gallons ; > 4 psia ; Primar y an d secondar

y seal s required . To p 50 % - > 40,00 0 gallons ; > 4 psia ; Primar y an d secondar

y seal s required . 

# -q sP.7 6

Attachment

2 Memo t o Stev e Shedd Februar y 9 , 199 8 Pag e 2 Smal l Tank s (1 0 rules) : To p 12 % - > 25 0 gallons ; Organi c liquids ; I f th e tank i s to p loaded , i t

mus t b e equippe d wit

h apermanen t

submerge d fill pipe . To p 50 % - > 58 0 gallons ; > 1. 5 psia ; I f th e tan k i s to p loaded , i t

mus t b e equippe dwith a permanen t

submerge d fill pipe . Larg e tank s fo r produce d crud e oi l o r condensat e prio r t o leas e custod y transfe r (1 8 rules) : To p 12 % - < 422,40 0 gallons ; Exemptio n fromregulatio n To p 50 % - < 416,00 0 gallons ; Exemptio n fromregulatio n Welde d tank s (8) : To p 100 % - Al l tank s containin g petroleu mliquid s < 4 psia ; I f th e tan k i s o f welde d construction , n o secondar

y seal i s require dif

th e primar

y seal i s amechanical-shoe , liqui d mounted , metallic-typ e sho e seal , o r equivalent . 

### Transfe r Operation s (2

5 rules) : To p 12 % - Organi c liquid s > 1. 5 psia ; 1 0 mg/ L emissio n limi t To p 15 % - Organi c liquids ; 2 1 mg/L emissio n limi t To p 35 % - Organi c liquid s > 1. 5 psia ; Vapor control-95 % To p 50 % - Organi c liquid s > 1. 5 psia ; Vapo r tight vapo r balanc e syste m To p 75 % - Organi c liquids ; Submerge dloading require d 

### Wastewate r (7) : To p 12 % - An

y tan k whic h contain s wastewate r mus t b e equippe dfo r

vapo r control-95 % To p 50 % - Wastewater

storag e tank s wit

h >20 0 gallon s o f

wastewater/day ; Floatin g roo f require d To p 80 % - Liqui d balancin g (dilution ) to < 0. 5 psia , o r reduc e VO C concentratio n b y 90 %



### ^Lf iAttachment 2 P.7 7



## STAT E REGULATION

S SUMMARIES , STORAG E VESSEL S State California , Sout h Coas t California , Ba y Are a California , Ventura Count y Illinoi s (Chicago )

California , Sa n Dieg o California , Ventur a Count y California , Ventur a Count y California , Ba y Are a California , Sa n Joaqui n Colorad o Indian a Ne w Yor k Virgini a Regulatio n

46 3 8-5-300 71. 2
218.119-120 , Subpar t B

6 1

71. 2

71. 2

8-5-300

462 3
5CC R1001- 9 Reg # 7 326IA C 8- 9 Sectio n 22 9 9 VA C 5-40

- 1390 Applicabilit y

Storag e vessels ; > 19,81 5 gallons ; > 39,63 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; > 39,62 6 gallon s Q50m3 ) Storag e vessels ; >40,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; >40,00 0 gallon s

Storag e vessels ; > 40,00 0 gallons ; Plant s > 5,000,00 0 gal/yr Storag e vessels ; > 10,000 gallons , < 20,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; > 20,00 0 gallons , < 40,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; >19,81 3 gallon s (75m3), < 39,62 6 gallon s (150m3 2 Storag e vessels ; > 19,800 gallon s Storag e vessels ; >40,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; >39,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; >40,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; >40.00 0 gallon s Process/Product s

Organi c Liquids ; > 1. 5 psia ; > 0. 5 psi a Organi c liquids ; > 0. 5 psi a Organi c liquids ; >0. 5 psi a VOL ; >0.7 5 psi aVPL : >1. 5 psi a
Organi c liquid s (VOC) ; RVP > 3. 0 psi a Organi c liquids ; >1. 5 psi a

Organi c liquids ; >1. 5 psi a Organi c liquids ; > 1. 5 psi a Organi c Liquid s (includin g crude oi l & petroleum distillates) ; > 1.

5 psi a Petroleu mliquids ; >0.6 5 psi a Organi c liquids ; >0.7 5 psia , <ll.ljjsi a Organi c liquids ; >1. 0 psi a Petroleu mliquids ; >1. 5 psi a Standards/Reauirement s

External floatin g roof

, interna l floating-type cover , o r

vapo r recover y syste m(95 % b y weight) Vapo r los s contro l device-95 % b y weight efficiency External o r

interna l floating roo f o r vapo r recover y syste m(95 % b y weight) VOL : IFR , EFR , or

approve d contro l devic e (95 % VO C reductio n o r

greater-90 % i

f installe d befor

e 1993) . VPL : Floatin g roo f

o r contro l syste

ma t 85 % Floatin g roo f

o r vapo r contro l system-95 %
Permanent

submerge d fill pipe ; pressure relie f

valv e (90%) ; external o r

interna l floating roo f

o i vapo r recover y syste m(95 % b y weight^ Permanent

submerge d fill pipe ; external o r

interna l floating roo f

o r vapo r recover y syste m(95 % b y weight) Vapo r los s contro l device-95 % by weigh t efficiency Floatin g roo f

tank , or vapo r contro l system-95 % Floatin g roof

, vapo r recover y system , o r equivalen t Variou s fixedroo f

requirement s Floatin g roo f

and vapo r contro l syste m 4 0 CF R60 , Subpar

t K b


# n

### Attachmen t2 ' STAT E REGULATION S SUMMARIES , STORAG E VESSEL S (Cont. ) Stat e S . Dakot a Kentuck y Arkansa s Main e Nebraska Orego n Connecticut Kentuck y

Connecticut

Rhode Islan d
Mass . Regulatio n

74:36:07:1 4 40 1 KA R59:48 5 19.10.5. 1 Chapter 11 1
340-22-16 0 Sectio n 22a-174

- 2 0 40 1 KA R59:05 0

Sectio n 22a-174

- 2 0 11. 2 31 0 CM R7.24 Applicabilit y

Storag e vessel s Storag e vessels ; >40,000jallon s Storag e vessels ; >39,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; >39,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessel s Storag e vessels ; >39,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; >40,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; >40,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; >40,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; >40,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; >40,00 0 gallon s Process/Product s

Organi c liquid s Organi c liquid s Petroleumliquids ; >1.5 2 psi a Petroleumliquids ; >1.5 2 psi a Organi c liquid s Organi c liquids ; >1.5 2 psi a Organi c liquids ; >1. 5 psi a Petroleumliquids ; >1. 5 psia , <11. 1 psi a Organi c liquids ; >1. 5 psia , < 11. 0 psi a Petroleumliquids ; >1.5 2 psi a Organi c liquids ; >1. 5 psi a Standards/Reauirement s 4 0 CF R60 , Subpar

t K b 4 0 CF R60 , Subpar

t K b 4 0 CF R60.110-NSP S fo

r Storag e vessel s fo

r Petroleum liquids ; or floating roo f

o r cove r Vessel s w / fixed roof

; 4 0 CFR , par t 60 L Subpart s I^Ka , & K

b Subpart s K , K a Floatin g roof

; subpart s K, K

a Vapo r recover y system(95 % by weight) ; permanen t

submerge d fill pip e Externa l floating roo f

(w/specifi c seals) ; fixed roo f

interna l floating roof ; vapo r recover y syste m(95 % b y weight VOC) ; o r a n equivalen

t system Fixe d roo f & floating roof

, or vapor recover y syste m(95 % b y weight) ; permanent

submerged fill pip e Vessel s w /

fixed roof

; VO C reduce d b y 95 % usin g avapor recover y system Submerge d fill pip e required ; an d a n externa l floatin g roo f

or bot h a pressure tan k

syste m& avapor recover y system(95 % emission reduction )



# ^ eAttachmen t 2 

## STAT E REGULATION

S SUMMARIES , STORAG E VESSELS (Cont. ) State Kansa s

Distric t o f Columbi a Michiga n Texa s Florid a Washington Nort h Carolin a Wisconsin Kentuck y Maryland
Vermon t Nevad a Regulatio n

28-19-6 5

70 1 R336.160 4 Sectio n 115.112 : Subchapte r A 62-296.50 8 WA C 173-490

- 04 0 .092 5 N R419.0 5 40 1 KA R59:05 0 26-11-13.0 3 5-253. 1 445B.39 5 Applicabilit y

Storag e vessels ; >40,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; >40,000j»allon s Storag e vessels ; >40,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; >40,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; >42,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; >40,000jallon s Storag e vessels ; >39,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; >40,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; >40,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; >40,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; >40,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; >40.00 0 gallon s Process/Product s

Organi c liquids ; >1. 5 psi a

Petroleumliquids ; >1. 5 psi a Organi c liquids ; >1.5 2 psia , < 1 1 psi a Organi c liquids ; > 1. 5 psi a Petroleumliquids ; >1. 5 psi a Petroleumliquids ; >1. 5 psi a Petroleumliquids ; >1.5 2 psi a Organi c liquids ; >1.5 2 psi a Petroleumliquids ; >1. 5 psia , <11. 1 psi a Organi c liquids ; >1. 5 psia , <11. 1 psi a Petroleumliquids ; >1.5 2 psi a Organi c liquids ; >1. 5 psi a Standards/Requirement s Floatin g roo f

( < 11. 1 psia ) or vapor contro l system-90% , o r equivalent ; Pressure tan k

seale d o r vente d t o avapor

contro l system ( > 11. 1 psia ) Pressur e tan k o r vapo r los s contro l device s Pressur e tank , floatin g cover

o r roof , vapor recover y system(90 % b y weight ) Floatin g roo f

or vapo r recover y system-90 % Floatin g roo f Floating roo f

o r equivalent Floatin g roo f Floatin g roof

, vapo r condensatio n system , vapor

holdin g tanks , o

r equivalent Floatin g roo f

o r vapo r recover y system , o r thei r equivalent s Floatin g roof

, vapo r contro l system , pressure tank , o

r equivalent Vessel s w/ fixed roo f mus t b e equippedwit

h a n interna l floatin g roo f Floatin g roo f

(<1 1 psia ) o r equivalent : Submerge d fill pip e

-=*-<
_P.8 0

Attachment

2 

## STAT E REGULATION

S SUMMARIES , STORAG E VESSEL S (Cont. ) Stat e Sout h Carolin a Ne w Mexic o Wes t Virgini a

Wisconsi n Hawai i Arizon a Missour i Uta h Indian a Illinoi s Ne w Jerse y Oklahom a Nort h Carolin a Penns . Regulatio n

62.5 , par t 0 NMAC 2.37.20 5 45-21-2 7

N R420.0 3 11-60.1-3 9 R18-2-71 0 1 0 CS R10-2.260 R307-14- 2 326IA C 8-4- 3 218.121 , Subpar

t B 7:27-16. 2 252:100-37-1 5 .051 8 129.56-5 7 Applicabilit y

Storag e vessels ; >40,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; > 250,00 0 (65,000

- new)gallon s Storag e vessels ; >40,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; >40,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; >40,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; >40,000jallon s Storag e vessels ; >40,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; >40,000jallon s Storag e vessels ; >39,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; >40,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessel s Storag e vessels ; >40,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; >50,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; >40.00 0 gallon s Process/Product s

Petroleumliquids ; >1. 5 psi a Organi c liquids ; > 3. 0 (1.5

- new ) psia , <11. 0 psi a Petroleu mliquids ; >1. 5 psi a

Petroleu mliquids ; >1.5 2 gsia , < 11. 1 psi a VOCs ; > 1. 5 psi a Petroleu mliquids ; >1. 5 psi a Petroleu mliquids ; >1. 5 psi a Petroleu mliquids ; >1.5 2 psi a Petroleu mliquids ; >1.5 2 psia ; Petroleu mliquids ; >1. 5 psia , <12. 5 psi a Organi c liquid s Organi c liquid s Organi c liquids ; >1. 5 psi a VOCs : > 1.5 psi a Standards/Requirement s 1 Floatin g roo f

o r equivalent Floatin g roof

; vapor recovery syste m External floating roo f

tank s hav e sea l reaquirements ; fixed roo f tank s mus t

hav e interna

l floatin g roo f o r equivalen t Floatin g roof

, vapor recover y system , or equivalen t Floatin g roo f

or avapor recover y & disposa l syste m Floatin g roo f

o r equivalen t (i f liquid>1 2 gsia } Floatin g roof

, vapor recover y system , o r equivalen t Floatin g roo f Floatin g roo f Floatin g roo f Miscellaneous ; Se e Tabl e 2 A Pressure tank , floating roof , vapo r recover y system , o r

equivalent Pressure tank , floating roof , vapo r recover y system , or

equivalent Floatin g roo f

o r vapor recover y svstem-80 %



# 8 oP.8 1



### Attachmen t 2 

## STAT E REGULATION

S SUMMARIES , STORAG E VESSEL S (Cont. ) Stat e Ne w Hampshire Illinoi s

Montan a
Ne w Jersey
Minnesota
Alask a California , Sa n Dieg o Colorad o Ne w Mexic o California , Ventur a Count y Indiana
Kentucky Regulatio n

Env- A 1204.2 0 215.121 , Subpar

t B
17.8.32 4
7:27-16. 4
7011.150 5 • 1 8 AA C 50.08 5 6 1 5CC R1001- 9 Re g # 7 NMA C 2.37.20 5 71. 2
326IA C 8- 9
40 1 KA R59:05 0 Applicabilit y Storage vessels ; >40,00 0 gallon s Storage vessels ; >40,00 0 gallon s Storage vessels ; >65,00 0 gallon s Storage vessels ; > 2,00 0 gallon s Storage vessels ; > 2,00 0 gallon s & < 40,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; >378,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessel s Storag e vessel s Storage vessels ; > 250,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessel s Storage vessels ; >39,00 0 gallon s Storage vessels ; >40.00 0 gallon s Process/Product s

Organi c liquids ; >1.5 2 psia ; fixed roof

s Organi c liquid s >2. 5 psi a

Petroleu m liquid s o r Crude ; >2. 5 psi a Organi c liquid s
Petroleu m liquids ; > 1.

5 psia , < 11. 1 psi a Volatil e liquid s Organi c liquids ; > 1 1 psi a Organi c Liquids ; > 1 1 psi a Organi c liquids ; >11. 0 psi a Organi c liquids ; > 1 1 psi a Organi c liquid s > 11. 1 psi a
Petroleu m liquids ; > 11. 1 psi a Standards/Requirement s Variou s sea l & ven trequirements ;

RACT . <12. 5 psia-floatin g roof

, >12. 5 psia-vapo r recover y syste m consistin g o f

vapo r disposa l syste m (85% ) Pressur e tank , floatin g roo f

( < 1 3 psia) , vapo r recover y system , o r equivalen t > 100 0 L b VOC/year : vapo r contro l (90%) , floating roof , o r vapo r balanc e syste m Permanentsubmerge d fill pipe ; floatin g roof

, vapo r recovery system , o r equivalen t Interna l floatin g roof

, close d ven t syste m & vapo r control~95 %

BAC T Pressure tank Pressur e vesse l Pressure tank ; vapo r recovery system , o r equivalen t(95 % by

weight ^ Close d ven tsyste m (<50 0 ppm ) and a n approve d contro l devic e (95 % VO C reductio n o r greater ) Vapo r recover y system-95 % b y

veight , .



# P .P.8 2



### Attachmen t2 STAT E REGULATION S SUMMARIES , STORAG E VESSEL S (Cont. ) Stat e Michiga n Texa s Wisconsi n Ne w Jersey Illinoi s Minnesot a Wyomin g Ne w York Sout h Carolin a Washingto n Michiga n Illinoi s Illinoi s Oklahom a
Kentuck y Regulatio n

R336.160 5 Sectio n 115.112 : Subchapte r A N R420.0 3 7:27-16.2 218.121 , Subpar

t B 7011.150 5

Sectio n 22 9 62.5 , par tP WA C 173-490 - 20 1 R336.162 3 215.124 , Subpar

t B 215.12 2 & 218.122 , Subpar

t B 252:100-39-4 8
40 1 KA R59:05 0 Applicabilit y

Storag e vessels ; >40,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; >25,000jgallon s Storag e vessels ; >40,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; > 1,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; >40,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; > 2,00 0 gallon s & < 40,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; >65,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; >20,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; >39,600jallon s Storag e vessels ; >40,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; >40,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessel s Storag e vessels ; > 25 0 ga l Storag e vessels ; <40,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; >58 0 pallon s Process/Product s

Organi c liquids ; >1 1 psi a Organi c liquids ; > 1 1 psi a Petroleum liquids ; >11. 1 psi a Organi c liquids ; > 13. 0 psi a Petroleu m liquids ; >12. 5 psi a Petroleum liquids ; >11. 1 psi a
Petroleum liquids ; RVP> 5

lb s Organi c liquids ; >4. 0 psi a Externa l Floater s Externa l Floater s Petroleum liquids ; >1. 0 psia , bu t< 1 1 _psi

a Petroleum liquid s Organi c materia

l Organi c liquid s
Petroleu m liquids ; > 1.5 psi a Standards/Reauirement s

Pressur e tank , vapo r recover y system-90% , o r equivalen t Submerge d fill pip e an d vapo r recover y system-90 % Vapo r recover y syste m o r equivalen t Vapo r contro l syste m a

t90 % b y weigh t Vapo r recovery syste m consistin g o f vapo r disposa l syste m (85% ) Permanen

tsubmerge d fill pipe ; vapo r recover y system , o r equivalen t Pressure tan k Variou s seal & ven trequirements Variou s sea l requirements Variou s sea l requirements Externa l floating roo f

tanks : variou s sea l requirements Externa l floating roo f

tanks : variou s sea l requirements Permanen

tsubmerge d fill pip e

> 40 0 gallons—submerge d pip e o r botto m fill; >200 0 gallons-vapo r contro l sy_ste

m £90 % b y weight } Permanen

tsubmerge d fill pip e



# ftZ-P.8 3

Attachment

2 

## STAT E REGULATION

S SUMMARIES , STORAG E VESSEL S (Cont. ) Stat e Nort h Dakot a Arizon a California , Ba y Are a New Jersey Wisconsin Georgi a Florid a Illinoi s Kansa s Indian a Washingto n Virgini a Nort h Carolin a Illinoi s Regulatio n

33-15-07-0 1 R I 8-2-905 8-5-300
7:27-16. 4 N R419.0 5 V V 62-296.50 8 215.123 , Subpar

t B 28-19-6 5 326IA C 8-4- 3 WA C 173-490

- 20 1 9 VA C 5-40

- 1390 .092 5 215.123 , Subpar

t B Applicabilit y

Storag e vessels ; >1,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; <40,000jallon s Storag e vessels ; <39,62 6 gallon s (15 0 m3 ) Storag e vessels ; > 2,000jallon s Storag e vessels ; > 100 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; >4,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; <422,40 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; <422,40 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; <422,40 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; <420,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; <420,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; <420,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; <416,00 0 gallon s Storag e vessels ; <378,00 0 gallon s Process/Product s Organic liquid s Petroleu mliquid s Organi c liquids ; >0. 5 psi a Organic liquid s Organi c liquids ; >1.5 2 psi a Organi c liquid s Produced crud e oi l & condensat e prio r t o custod y transfe r Produce d crude oi l & condensat e prior t o custod y transfe r Produce d crude oi l & condensat e prior t o custod y transfe r Crud e & condensat

e prior to leas e custod

y transfe r Produce d crude oi l & condensat e prior to custod y transfe r Produce d crude oi l & condensat e prio r t o custod y transfe r Produced crude oi l & condensat e prio r t o custod y transfe r Produced oi l o r

condensat e i n crud e oi l gatherin g Standards/Requirement s

Permanent

submerged fill pip e Submerge d filling devic e Permanent

submerged fill pip e Permanent

submerged fill pip e Permanent

submerged fill pip e Permanent

submerge d fill pip e Exempt Exempt Exempt Exemp t Exempt Exempt Exempt Exempt



## P>ZAttachmen t 2 

## STAT E REGULATION

S SUMMARIES , STORAG E VESSEL S (Cont. ) P.8 4

Stat e Regulatio n Applicabilit y Process/Product s Standards/Requirement s Indian a326IA C 8-4- 3 Storag e vessel s Petroleu mliquids ; < 4. 0 psi a Vesse l o f welde d construction , havin g prope r closur e devic e Sout h 62.5 , part

P Storag e vessel s Carolin a- Petroleu mliquids ; >1. 5 psia , < 4 psi a Ifth e tan k i s awelde d tank , n o other contro l i s necessar

y Washingto n WA C 173

- Storag e vessel s

490-20 1 Petroleu mliquids ; >1. 5 psia , < 4 psi a Ifth e tan k i s awelde d tank , n o other contro l i s necessar

y Marylan d 26-1 1 -13.0 2 Storag e vessel s Petroleu mliquids ; >1. 5 psia , < 4 psi a Ifth e tan k i s awelde d tank , n o othe r contro l i s necessar

y



# 8 ^P.8 5



### Attachmen t 2 

## STAT E REGULATION

S SUMMARIES , TRANSFE ROPERATION

S (Cont. )
Stat e California , Sout h Coas t

California , Sa n Joaqui n Alaska California , Ba y Are a Texa s Oklahom a Ne w Jersey California , Sa n Joaqui n Louisian a Oklahom a

California , Ventur a Count y Connecticut Wisconsin 

### Regulatio n

46 2

462 4

1 8 AA C 50.09 0
8-6-30 0 Sectio n 115.211

- : Subchapte

r C 252:100-39-4 8 7:27-16. 5 462 4 33:111:210 7 252:100-37-1 6

71. 3

Sectio n 22a-174

- 2 0 N R419.0 5 Applicabilit y

TT/railca r transfe r operations ; > 20,00 0 gallons/da y

TT/railcars : Clas s 1 (>20 k gal/day) . Class2(4k-20 k 

### ja!/2s_ L Transfe r operations ; > 1 5 million gallons.yea

r Transfe r operation s

- Transfe r operation s Transfe r operation s Transfe r operations ; 6,000,000 gallons/yea

r thrupu t Transfe r operations ; > 20,00 0 gallons/da

y Transfe r operations ; > 20,00 0 gallons/da

y Transfe r operations ; > 40,00 0 gallons/da

y

Transfe r Operation s >20,00 0 gallons/day ; > 150,000 gallons/yea

r Transfe r operations ; > 10,00 0 gallons/da

y Transfe r operations ; >40.00 0 eallons/da

v 

### Process/Product s Organi c liquids ; > 1.5 psi a

Organi c liquids ; > 1. 5 psi a

Volatil e liquid s Organi c liquid s Organi c liquids ; > 0. 5 psi a Organi c liquid s Organi c liquid s Organi c liquids ; > 1.

5 psi a Organi c liquids ; > 1.5 psi a Organi c liquid s
Organi c liquids ; > 1.

5 psi a
Organi c liquids ; >1. 5 psi a Organi c liquids ; > 1.5 2 psi a 

### Standards/Reauirement s 1 Vapo r recover y and/o r disposa l system=0.291bVOC/l,00 0 gallon s organi c liqui d transferred ; afte r Feb . 1998-0.0 8 lb VOC/1,00 0 gallon s organi c liqui d

transferre d Clas s 1 : 0.0 8 lb/1,00 0 gal . Clas s 2 : 95 % b y weight lOmg/ L emissio n limit
2 1 mg/ L emissio n limit Vapo r recover y system(90% ) o r vapor balanc e syste

m ab(d)sorptio n system-90 % b y weight ; vapo r

handlin g system disposa l efficiency o f

95% . 95 % b y weight

VO C emissio n reductio n 95 % b y weight

efficien t reductio n o f VOC s Vapo r collectio n system-90 % Vapo r collectio n syste

mo r botto m loadin g wit

h close d hatches ; Disposal-90 % b y weight

b y mean s o f avapo r liqui d absorbe

r system . Botto mloade d vapo r

recover y systemincludin g avapo r retum/condenstio n syste

mo r a vapor disposa l syste ma t 90 % b y weight Vapo r collectio n adaptor ; vapor tigh t sea l Vapo r collectio n & disposa

l svstem 

## P ^P.8 6

Attachmen t

2 

### STAT E REGULATION S SUMMARIES , TRANSFE R

OPERATION S (Cont. ) Stat e Regulatio n Applicability Process/Product s Standards/Requirement s Texa s Sectio n 115.211 - Transfe r operation s

: Subchapte r C Organi c liquids ; > 1. 5 psi a Vapor-tigh tvapo r recover y syste m Michiga n R336.160 9 Transfer operations ; >5,000,00 0 gallons/yea r Jhroughj)i £ Organi c liquids ; >1. 5 psi a Vapo r recover y system ; 0. 7 lb/100 0 gallon s emissio n limi t
Massachusetts 31 0 CM R7.2 4 Transfer Operations ; CM,MB,MV,PV , S M Bul k Plant

s Organi c materia

l > 1.5 psi a Vapo r balanc e syste m required ;

transfer mus ttak e plac e through a submerge d fil l pip e Ne w Mexic o NMA C 2.37.20 5 Transfe r operations ' Organi c liquids ; > 1.5 psi a Loadin g ar m wit h a vapo r collectio n adapter ; a mean s t o preven torgani c compoun d draing e from loadin g devic e Massachusetts 31 0 CMR7.2 4 Transfer Operations ; U Bul k Terminal s Organi c liquids ; > 1. 5 psi a Vapo r collectio n & disposa l syste m required ; 8 0 mg/lite r emissio n limi t California , Ventura Count y 71. 3 Transfe r operation s Organi c liquids ; > 0. 5 psi a Submerge d fill pipe , o r botto m loadin g Illinoi s 218.122 , Subpar tTT . railcar transfer (Chicago ) B operations ; >40,00 0 gallons/da y Organi c liquids ; >2. 5 psi a i f Emissio n limi to f

8 lbs/hr , n o odo r nuisanc e submerge d loading , o r equivalen t Nort h Dakot a 33-15-07-0 1 Transfe r operations ;

>J20,000_gaVday > _ _ Organi c liquid s North Carolin a .094 8 Transfe r operations ; > 20,00 0 gal/day Organi c liquids ; > 1. 5 psi a Submerge d filling ar m o r othe r Submerge d loadin g through bottom loader s o r equivalen t Colorad o 5CC R1001- 9 Transfe r operations ;

Re g #7 >5 6 gallon s VOC s Submerge d o r botto m loading ; top-fil l pip e t o withi n 6 inche s o f th e botto m o f

th e tan k Wisconsi n N R419.0 5 Transfe r operations ; < 40,00 0 gal/da y Organi c liquids ; >1.5 2 psi a Submerge d fill pip e extendin g t o withi n 6 inche s o f

th e tank (vessel ) botto m California , 71. 3 Transfe r Operations Ventur a >20,00 0 gallons/day ; Count y > 150,00 0 gallons/yea r Organi c liquids ; > 0. 5 psi a Overfil l protectio n syste m

Ne w Mexic o NMA C 11.65.II. 6 Transfe r operation s Organi c liquids ; > 15. 0 psi a Emissio n limit-2.21bs/6,00 0 gallon s loaded ; sam e fo r >1. 5 psi a & < 15. 0 psia , if > 1,00 0 gallons/month (unles s there i s a vapo r emissio n contro l system ) Louisian a 33:111:210 7 Transfer operations ; Marine vessel s Organic liquids ; >1. 5 psia ;

>10 0 tons/y r uncontrolle d emission s Vapo r collectio n system-90% ;

Barge-Crude=30mg/L ; Ship crude=12mg/

L 

### QLs>Attachment 2 

### STAT E REGULATION S SUMMARIES , TRANSFE R

OPERATION S (Cont. ) Stat e Regulatio n Massachusett s 31 0 CM

R7.24(8 )

Rhode Islan d
Main e New Jersey California , Sa n Dieg o

California , Sa n Dieg o Oklahom a Michiga n 32. 2 Chapte r 60 0 7-.1E- 3
6 1

6 1

252:100-37-1 6
R336.170 6 Applicabilit y

Transfe r operation s

Transfe r operation s Transfe r operation s Transfe r operation s Transfe r Operations ; Bot h mobil e transpor t an d stationar y storag e tank > 55 0 gallon s Transfe r operations ; mobil e transpor

t tan k > 55 0 gallon s Transfe r operations ; < 40,00 0 gal/da

y Transfe r operations ; >5,000,00 0 gallons/yea

r throughout Process/Product s

Marine vessel previou s cargo-organi c liqui d Marine vessel previou s cargo-organi c liqui d Petroleu mliquid s Pipeline s Organi c liquid s
Organi c liquid s

Truck s (vessels) ; > 20 0 gallon s Crud e Oi l > 1.5 psi a Standards/Reauirement s

95 % emissio n reductio n b y recover y devic e or

98 % b y weight b y combustio n device ; an d2 lb/1,00 0 bbl s emission limi t VO C reduce d b y 95 % b y weight ; 98 % b y weight

i f acontro l devic e i s use d Miscellaneou s minor

requirement s Confor mt o 4 9 CF

R195 , "Transportatio n o f

Liquid s b y Pipeline " Equippe d wit

h asubmerge d fill pipe ; 95 % b y weight

VO C

90 % b y weight

o f VOC ; 0.2 9 lb VOC/1,00 0 gallon s loaded ; pressure ma

y no t excee d 1 8 inche s o f wate r Aggregate loading pipe s equippe d t o fill—97 % submergenc e mus t b e maintaine d Vapor recover y system ; 0. 7 lb/100 0 gallon s emissio n limit ; o r submerge d fill pip e



## PT 3Attachmen t2 

### STAT E REGULATION S SUMMARIES , WASTEWATE ROPERATION S Stat e Virgini a Washingto n Montan a
North Dakot a Hawai i Marylan d
Louisian a

California , Ventur a Count y California , Ba y Are a Marylan d North Carolin a Ne w Jersey Ne w Jersey Sout h Carolin a

Arizon a Regulatio n

9 VA C 5-40-139 0 WA C 173-490 - 04 0 17.8.32 4
33-15-07-0 1
11-60.1-4 0
26-11-13.0 6
Sectio n 2153 : Subchapte r M

71. 3

8-5-32 8 26-11-13.0 6 .051 8 7: 1 E- 2 7:lE- 4
62.5 , par tO

R I 8-2-90 5 Applicabilit

y Wastewate r Separator s Wastewater Separator s Wastewater Separators ; >20 0 gal/day Wastewater Separators ; >20 0 gal/day Wastewate r Separators ; >20 0 gal/day Wastewater Separators ; >20 0 gal/day SI C Codes : 28-21 , 23,24,33,34,36 , 65,69,7 9 & 49-52 , 53,59 .

Delivery Vessel s

Wastewater ; Tank Cleanin g Wast e Wast e Process/Product s

An y petroleu m liqui d = > kerosen e i n volatility An y volatil e organi c liqui d
VOCs ; > 0. 5 psi a VOC ; > 1.

5 psi a
VO C Wastewate r - storage , handling , transfer, o r treatment.

Organi c liquid s
Organi c liquids ; >0. 5 psi a VO C Photochemicall y reactiv e VOC Storage , transfer , equipmen tleak s Storage , transfer , equipmen tleaks Equipmen

tleak s

Pump s & compressors Tanks

VO C Standards/Requirements

Vapo r contro l system-95 % Floatin g roo f

o r fixed & seale d soli d cove r Floatin g roo f

o r a vapo r recovery & disposa l syste m Floatin g roof

, a vapo r recover

y & vapo r disposa l system , o r equivalen t Floatin g roo f

o r a vapo r recovery & vapo r disposa l syste m Floatin g roof

, a vapo r recovery system , o r equivalen t Reduc e th e VO C conten to f th e strea m b y 9 0 percen t(8 5 percent fo r biotreatmen tunits ) & reduce th e VO C conten tt o les s tha n 10 0 pp m b y weight . Also , variou s requirements fo r WW storag e

tanks . Vapo r recover y system ; pressure vacuu m relie f

device ; secondar

y overfil l protection ; loadin g connector/adapte r Liqui d balancing ; 90 % b y weigh t

efficienc y Canno tdischarg e >20 0 lb s unles s th e discharg e i s reduced b y 85 % Canno tdischarg e >4 0 lb s unles s th e discharg e i s reduce d b y 85 %

Se e th e rul e Submi ta DPC C plan , demonstratin g complianc e wit h 7:lE- 2 Monthl y inspectio n throug h th e roo f hatch ; complet e inspectio n o f cove r & sea l wheneve r tan k i s emptie d o r non-operational fo r a

year Mechanica l seal s o r equivalen t 

# P^ R