alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, Douglas P. Collier, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Volcom, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: August 12, 2005 /s/ Douglas P. Collier   Douglas P. Collier   Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer(Principal Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 223 (Friday, November 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70939-70940]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29171]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection


Approval of Saybolt LP, as a Commercial Gauger

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of approval of Saybolt LP, as a commercial gauger.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.13, 
Saybolt LP, 7308 North Main Street, Jacksonville, FL 32208, has been 
approved to gauge petroleum and petroleum products for customs 
purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone 
wishing to employ this entity to conduct gauger services should request

[[Page 70940]]

and receive written assurances from the entity that it is approved by 
the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific gauger 
service requested. Alternatively, inquires regarding the specific 
gauger service this entity is approved to perform may be directed to 
the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The 
inquiry may also be sent to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#67040517490b06050f1627030f1449000811"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="492a2b396725282b2138092d213a672e263f">[email protected]</span></a>. Please reference the Web 
site listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and 
accredited laboratories. http:[sol][sol]cbp.gov/xp/cgov/import/
operations--support/labs--scientific--svcs/commercial--gaugers/.

DATES: The approval of Saybolt LP, as commercial gauger became 
effective on June 29, 2010. The next triennial inspection date will be 
scheduled for June 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony Malana, Laboratories and 
Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-
1060.

    Dated: November 8, 2010.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
[FR Doc. 2010-29171 Filed 11-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 19-11273

Summary Calendar

Richard Warner, Joint Pro Se Plaintiff, 

Plaintiff—Appellant,

versus

United States of America, 

Defendant—Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:19-CV-796

Before King, Smith, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Richard Warner, federal prisoner # 43448-177, along with 44 other 

inmates incarcerated at the Bureau of Prisons’ Federal Medical Center in 

Fort Worth Texas, filed a civil lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of 

18 U.S.C. § 3632(d)(4)(D). The district court sua sponte determined that

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 26, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 19-11273 Document: 00515758351 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/26/2021
No. 19-11273

2

the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 required each prisoner to file a 

separate complaint asserting his individual claims, as well as paying a filing 

fee. The district court, therefore, ordered Warner’s complaint to continue 

and ordered the complaints of the other 44 inmates to be severed into 

separate actions. That order is the subject of this appeal.

“This Court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction, on its own 

motion, if necessary.” Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). 

We conclude that we lack appellate jurisdiction over the instant appeal 

because the district court’s severance order is not a final, appealable decision, 

a qualifying interlocutory order, or a reviewable collateral order. See

28 U.S.C. §§ 1291, 1292; Acevedo v. Allsup’s Convenience Stores, Inc., 600 

F.3d 516, 520 (5th Cir. 2010); In re Lieb, 915 F.2d 180, 184 (5th Cir. 1990). 

Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. 

Case: 19-11273 Document: 00515758351 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/26/2021
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the quarterly report of Data Call Technologies, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, I, Timothy E. Vance, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Timothy E. Vance

Timothy E. VanceCEODated: August 20, 2010

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to Data Call Technologies, Inc. andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Forms S-8 Nos. 33-43290, 33-65380 and 33-65382) of Health
Management Associates, Inc. of our report dated October 23, 1998, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Health
Management Associates, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended September 30, 1998.

                                                             ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Atlanta, Georgia
December 18, 1998

                                      54
#### The State ex rel. McCullough, Appellant, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees.

[Cite as *State ex rel. McCullough v. Indus. Comm.*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 543.]

(No. 98-536

Submitted September 15, 1998

Decided November 10, 1998.)

*544*Raymond J. Tisone & Associates Co., L.P.A,*and *Raymond J. Tisone,*for appellant.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Steven K. Aronojf,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission.

*Duvin, Cohn & Hutton*and *Clnistine C. Covey,*for appellee Ohio Turnpike Commission.

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed. The cause is returned to the Industrial Commission for relief consistent with *State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm*(1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., dissent.
----

----

|   | 1. | The Report      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Registrant. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                         | InterAmerican Gaming,      Inc. |                                                                                              |
|------------------------------|---------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                         |                            |                                                                                              |   |
| Date:      December 29, 2008 | By:                             | /s/      Gary N. Hokkanen                                                                         |   |
|                         |                            | Name:      Gary N. Hokkanen                                                                       |   |
|                         |                            | Title :      Principal Financial Officer    Chief Financial      Officer |   |
|                         |                            |                                                                                              |   |
```

[108th Congress Public Law 305]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ305.108]

[[Page 118 STAT. 1130]]

Public Law 108-305
108th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To provide for the conveyance of the real property located at 1081 West 
 Main Street in Ravenna, Ohio. <<NOTE: Sept. 24, 2004 -  [H.R. 3908]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LAND CONVEYANCE.

    The Secretary of Labor shall convey, without charge or 
consideration, to Portage County, Ohio, all right, title, and interest 
of the United States (including all Federal equity) in and to the parcel 
of real property located at 1081 West Main Street in Ravenna, Ohio, to 
the extent such right, title, or interest was acquired through grants to 
the State of Ohio under title III of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
501 et seq.) or the Wagner-Peyser Act (29 U.S.C. 49 et seq.) or through 
funds distributed to the State of Ohio under section 903 of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1103).

    Approved September 24, 2004.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3908:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 150 (2004):
            June 2, considered and passed House.
            Sept. 10, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
97-73.

#### State ex rel. Boggs v. Springfield Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn.

Summit App. No. 16451. Reported at 82 Ohio St.3d 222, 694 N.E.2d 1346. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.

Cook, J., not participating.
EXHIBIT 21

                                  SUBSIDIARIES


American Network Exchange, Inc.
Capital Network System Inc.
Capital Network International, Inc.1
Capital Network Mexico2
AMNEX International, Inc.
National Billing Exchange, Inc.3
Crescent Public Communications Inc.
American Hotel Exchange, Inc.
Sun Tel North America, Inc.4
Telecommunity & International Network Services, Inc.5



--------
1Wholly-owned subsidiary of Capital Network System Inc.
2Wholly-owned subsidiary of Capital Network International, Inc.
380%-owned subsidiary of AMNEX, Inc.
480%-owned subsidiary of Crescent Public Communications, Inc.
550%-owned subsidiary of AMNEX, Inc.


<PAGE>
#### § 201.57 Hard seeds.

Seeds which remain hard at the end of the prescribed test because they have not absorbed water, due to an impermeable seed coat, are to be counted as “hard seed.” If at the end of the germination period provided for legumes, okra, cotton and dichondra in these rules and regulations there are still present swollen seeds or seeds of these kinds which have just started to germinate, all seeds or seedlings except the above-stated shall be removed and the test continued for 5 additional days and the normal seedlings included in the percentage of germination. For flatpea, continue the swollen seed in test for 14 days when germinating at 15-25 °C or for 10 days when germinating at 20 °C.

[5 FR 33, Jan. 4, 1940, as amended at 10 FR 9952, Aug. 11, 1945; 20 FR 7936, Oct. 21, 1955; 65 FR 1708, Jan. 11, 2000]
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 24, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice 132060 & (28) Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 132060 COA: 268470 Wayne CC: 81-003916 FONZA JACKSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the August 16, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals and the motion to remand are considered. We DIRECT the Wayne County Prosecuting Attorney to answer the application for leave to appeal within 28 days after the date of this order, limited to the issue whether an appeal was taken from the May 29, 1981 order of the Wayne County J uvenile Court waiving its jurisdiction over
defendant to the Detroit Reco rder’s Court, and if no such appeal was taken, whether appointed appellate counsel rendered ineffective assist ance by failing to pursue the appeal.

The application for leave to appeal remains pending.

s0117 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 24, 2007

Clerk
Editorial Note on Part 1944
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1944 appear at 80 FR 9885, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1944.689 Long-term monitoring by grantee. ( a ) The grantee is required to perform long-term monitoring on any housing preservation program involving rental properties and co-ops. This monitoring shall be at least on an annual basis and shall consist of, at a minimum, the following: ( 1 ) All requirements noted in § 1944.663 of this subpart;
( 2 ) All requirements of the “ownership agreement” executed between the grantee and the rental property owner or co-op; and
( 3 ) All requirements noted in 2 CFR part 200 as adopted by USDA through 2 CFR part 400 during the effective period of the grant agreement.
( b ) The grantee is required to make available to Rural Development any such information as requested by Rural Development concerning the above. The grantee shall submit to the Rural Development servicing office an annual report every year while the ownership agreement is in effect. This report shall be submitted within 15 days after the anniversary date or end of the grant agreement. At a minimum, the report will consist of a statement that the grantee is in compliance with this subpart.
( c ) All files pertaining to such rental property owner or co-op shall be kept separate and shall be maintained for a period of 3 years after the termination date of the ownership agreement.
[58 FR 21894, Apr. 26, 1993, as amended at 79 FR 76011, Dec. 19, 2014]
###### Editorial Note on Part 1951

#### Editorial Notes:

1. Some of the exhibits referenced in this part 1951 are not published in the Code of Federal Regulations. Exhibits are available in any Rural Development office.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1951 appear at 80 FR 9890-9894, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1951.894 Debt settlement.

Debt settlement of all claims will be handled in accordance with subpart C of part 1956 of this chapter.

[80 FR 13201, Mar. 13, 2015]
#### Donald F. Barry, Petitioner, v State Division of Human Rights et al., Respondents.

Order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated November 29, 1979, unanimously confirmed, without costs and without disbursements. No opinion. Concur—Birns, J. P., Sullivan, Silverman, Lynch and Carro, JJ.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C U IT NUNE SAR GSYAN,

Pe t i tione r,
v. JEFFER SON B . SESSIONS III, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R e sponde nt. No. 14-70816 Age n c y No. A099-707-441
M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Argue d a nd Subm itte d M a

rc h 8, 2018 Pa sa de n a , C a l ifornia B e fore : GR

AB E R , W . FLETC HER , a nd OW ENS, C irc uit Judge s. Pe titioner Nune Sargsy an, a nat ive and c itiz e n of Arm e nia , se e ks re vie w of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (" B IA" ) de nia l of a sy lum , withholding of
re m ova l, a

nd prote c tion under the C onve ntion Agai nst Torture(" C A T" ). W e de ny the p e tition. 

# FIL ED MAR 22 2018 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a

ppropria te for public ation a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3.1. Substa ntia l e v ide nc e supports the c onc lusion tha

t Pe titione r did not te stify c re dibly . Li v. Holder, 559 F.3d 1096, 1102 (9th C ir. 2009). Pe titione r’ s te stim ony be fore the IJ wa s inc onsiste nt on se ve ra l points, inc luding the duration of he r husba

nd’ s e xtortion pa

ym e nts, these v e rity

of he r tooth injurie s, wha t y e ar the h a ir sa lon burne d down, a nd whe n he r husba

n d’ s le g wa s broke n. In de ny ing Pe titioner’ s c la im s, the B IA re l ie d on thoseinc onsiste n c ie s, none of whic h is

" m e re ly t rivia l." Shre stha

v. Holde r, 590 F.3d 1034, 1046 (9th C ir. 2010). 2. The B IA did not err in re j e c ting Pe titione r’ s due proc e ss c la im s, inc l uding those

re lating to the

inc om ple t e he aring tra

nsc ript a nd inte rruptions during he r te stim o ny . Pe titioner ha s fa i le d to de m onstra te tha t she suffe re d pre j udic e due to a

ny p roc e dura l e rror and, the re fore , he r due proc e ss c la im s fa il. M ora l e s-Iz quie rdo v. Gonz a le s, 486 F.3d 484, 495 (9th C ir. 2007) (e n ba n c ). 3. B e c a use Pe titioner fa ile d to a ddre ss he r C A T c l a im in he r brie f, she ha s wa ive d it. M artine z -Se rran o v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1260 (9th C ir. 1996). Pe tition DE NIE D.

2
**EXHIBIT 32.1** **CERTIFICATION    OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Commercial    Lines Inc. (the “Company”) on    Form 10-Q    for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the    Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the    “Report”), I, Mark R. Holden, Chief Executive    Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.    § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    result of operations of the Company. /s/  Mark    R. Holden    Mark R. Holden    President and Chief Executive Officer     November 8, 2006
§ 1970.101 General. ( a ) An EA is a concise public document used by the Agency to determine whether to issue a FONSI or prepare an EIS, as specified in subpart D of this part. If, at any point during the preparation of an EA, it is determined that the proposal will have a potentially significant impact on the quality of the human environment, an EIS will be prepared.
( b ) Unless otherwise determined by the Agency, EAs will be prepared for all “Federal actions” as described in § 1970.8, unless such actions are categorically excluded, as determined under subpart B of this part, or require an EIS, as provided under subpart D of this part;
( c ) Preparation of an EA will begin as soon as the Agency has determined the proper classification of the applicant's proposal. Applicants should consult as early as possible with the Agency to determine the environmental review requirements of their proposals. The EA must be prepared concurrently with the early planning and design phase of the proposal. The EA will not be considered complete until it is in compliance with this part.
( d ) Failure to achieve compliance with this part will postpone further consideration of the applicant's proposal until such compliance is achieved or the applicant withdraws the application. If compliance is not achieved, the Agency will deny the request for financial assistance.