alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
. :.: : .:~ . . : 1 : . . .
: i 

### _ 'O~FiCEOF~RArCoRNEYGENERALOFrEXAS

. ! . AUST'IN ., \ * *..; ...~ :.- ..; -o.- , '... i: .'

.I'. '-'. : -- '.

. . . ..
. .. ,-J:-j: 6,f 2 _’

. ._ .~ . .._. ...._

,

### : _. . . .. . . ~. i Aa we~understati your letter,roti

no8 d*si& to _* &we those 'o&ployees, copoc&ally thoss who have ceased,to 

### '. work for 

### $ht3

Pod83rnl

Gorornmnt, on your pay roll ,for a fmfYiolontlcq$I~Of tint 

### for sn3.dcrrployees to draw their ealary,for tho r.acat&on pf?rtcrd, to W.%ch they ~?ouXdham boon entitled if they .had contimod In your ezplognent. i. " In 1041 the Lo&slaturo in&&d fn the General

. . . . . _: .. .:. - 

### %al&rlos to bo @d ooooting.to the &ssifiO~tions of tm GoOm sOcwitg n&d *_ . .

. ‘. _.__ ._: ;,/.:. ^. ;i... 

### to eaployoessolco~cdand rated under' the pfnwnnol plan %n e2footbetgeomthe Sock13~'. '. Security Baard.axxl the.State ,?genriy. * Q 9. ,\. *Salaries of the employees of-the Unen;ploy- . .. ncnt Coqxssstion Ooiadsd~n 4Ml ~mmhors of .t3l8 cols?d.osfon

shall b0 p55Lic

In:accord~co'.' --.ti,th

the a~;reement~md.e between the Cats- ._ ~si.onaaxIthe Social Security 1soard,.bnt 3.31 .- I I

. . 

### ._ ~'IIG

case shall such.sala$-Lesba less thau


### . _' th0se 

### ,$.hqhxl by tho aCt GroatinglthoUn63li@~t CW~ZiSdZiOI3 cGn!&SSiOll." : 

### i .~ . - ./



### Said provkxLonsof-theA~oprlutlon Eill above '~&oteddo dolegate to fho'Soclu1Secuz=Tty Board aud the x&mbars of the~comdssiqn th0 authority to clsasLfy and rata .. the pfwsonnel of CNs CozwLosion. Uoweve~,uo call your at- 1. .tentLGn to tho fact that the authorization prGuidon that saxzir3.c~ shall be p&d accordi~ to thhan~reements tieby the -named parties.

'In your letter you stat3 the So&al Security Board .. . no* desires you to rcplaoo ocrttin persons on your pyroll for a n-pciflod number of dqo, not for tha purpose of 

### I;or- :' f@M~ lslyactu31 se~ce, but for tjaosole puqose 09 purr dotting those parsons who formrlg were mploycd by gou.to clraaconpmsation or pay 

### for their vncatictnperiod. In our opinion, the provisicns of ths A~~rG~~~ationJill~~bove quotcii,do uot 

### relar the &$.slatLve control wer s&d States &~cnncycxocpt In tho mnucr rcoited. __



### There is attached to the donaral Ap~~o~rj.ation'E3.11 of 1941 a nutior of n@nuaral ~x-octs~o~s~~

### arsong those is subsection 9, dOJl 

### reads a5 f0110Csr :“ . .i : _. ._ .x’ ..- : :
. . ‘.<;t . . . .?

. ‘. ; :.’

**: tm**  **tk?a ~li&3aGed**  **to be**  **%.A your**  **Gzploy. -**  **‘ .**  **: -** 

**. .**  **;** :
:

.
i
.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 21

                        SUBSIDIARIES OF INTERLEAF, INC.


1.  Avalanche Development Company

2.  Interleaf Australia Pty. Ltd.

3.  Interleaf Benelux, N.V./S.A.

4.  Interleaf Canada, Inc.

5.  Interleaf Foreign Sales Corp.

6.  Interleaf France, S.A.

7.  Interleaf GmbH

8.  Interleaf Iberica

9.  Interleaf Japan, Inc.

10. Interleaf Securities Corp.

11. Interleaf Switzerland, S.A.

12. Interleaf U.K. Ltd.

13. Interleaf World Trade, Inc.
Editorial Note on Part 1980
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1980 appear at 80 FR 9905, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1980.444 Appraisal of property serving as collateral. ( a ) Appraisal reports prepared by independent qualified fee appraisers will be required on all property that will serve as collateral. In the case of loans two million dollars or less, the State Director may modify this requirement by permitting the appraisal to be made by a qualified appraiser on the lender's staff with experience appraising the type of collateral involved. The appraisers will give their opinion regarding the current market value of the collateral and the purpose for which the appraisal will be used. The lender will be responsible for assuring that appropriate appraisals are made.
( b ) The lender will be responsible for determining that appraisers have the necessary qualifications and experience to make the appraisals. The lender will consult with Rural Development for its recommendations before having the appraisal made.
( c ) The lender will determine that the fees or charges of appraisers are reasonable.
( d ) Independent appraisals will be made in accordance with the accepted format of the industry and those prepared by the lender in accordance with its policy and procedures. All appraisals will become part of the application. (See § 1980.541(i)(6) of this subpart.)
( e ) If a subsequent loan request is made within 3 years from the date of the most recent borrower's appraisal report, and there is no significant change in collateral, then the Rural Development State Director in his/her discretion, and if the lender agrees, may use the existing appraisal report in lieu of having a new appraisal prepared.
[52 FR 6501, Mar. 4, 1987, as amended at 53 FR 40401, Oct. 17, 1988]
#### In the Matter of Sandra Lipari, Respondent, v John Lipari, Appellant.

— Two orders of the Family Court, Richmond County, dated April 24,1979, and December 21, 1979, affirmed, without costs or disbursements. No opinion. Appeal from a third order of the same court, dated February 15,1980, dismissed, without costs or disbursements. No appeal lies from an order denying reargument. Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Titone and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:95cr3041 LAC

DAVID STACEY

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on MAY 30, 2008 

Motion/Pleadings: REBUTTAL TO DENIAL OF §3582(c)(2) 

Filed by DEFENDANT PRO SE on 5/29/08 Doc.# 128

RESPONSES:

on Doc.#

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Mary Maloy

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 13th day of

June, 2008, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) Sentence has already been reduced. See Doc 123. 

 s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 3:95-cr-03041-LC-SMN Document 129 Filed 06/13/08 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 21

                        SUBSIDIARIES OF UNUM CORPORATION


Listed below are the subsidiaries of UNUM Corporation, as of December 31, 1997,
with their respective jurisdiction of incorporation.

UNUM Holding Company (Delaware)

                  First UNUM Life Insurance Company (New York)
                  Claims Service International, Inc. (Delaware)
                  UNUM International Underwriters Inc. (Delaware)

UNUM Life Insurance Company of America (Maine)

Colonial Companies, Inc. (Delaware)

                  Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Company (South Carolina)
                  BenefitAmerica, Inc. (South Carolina)

Options and Choices, Inc. (Wyoming)

UNUM European Holding Company Limited (United Kingdom)

                  UNUM Limited (United Kingdom)
                  Claims Services International Limited (United Kingdom)

Duncanson & Holt, Inc. (New York)

                  Duncanson & Holt Services, Inc. (Maine)
                  Group Management Services, Inc. (Washington)
                  Duncanson & Holt Administrative Services, Inc. (Delaware)
                  Duncanson & Holt Canada Ltd. (Canada)
                  TRI-CAN Reinsurance, Inc. (Canada)
                  Duncanson & Holt Asia PTE Ltd. (Singapore)
                  Duncanson & Holt Europe Ltd. (United Kingdom)

                     Duncanson & Holt Underwriters Ltd. (United Kingdom)
                     Duncanson & Holt Agencies Ltd. (United Kingdom)
                     Duncanson & Holt Syndicate Management Ltd. (United Kingdom)
                     Trafalgar Underwriting Agencies Ltd. (United Kingdom)

UNUM Japan Accident Insurance Company Limited (Japan)

UNUM International Ltd. (Bermuda)

Boston Compania Argentina de Seguros (Argentina)
GUIDELINES FOR SAMPLE COLLECTING AND
ANALYTICAL METHODS USED IN THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY FOR
DETERMINING CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF COAL

*By Vernon E. Swanson and
Claude Huffman, Jr.*

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR
735
1976

---

CONTENTS

1. Metric-English
        equivalents
2. Abstract
3. Introduction
4. Guidelines on
        collecting coal samples
5. Submitting samples
6. Analytical methods
        for determination of major, minor, and trace elements in
        coalSample
                preparation
            Individual
                analytical methodsAnalysis of coal ash
                    Ashing
                    Atomic absorption spectroscopy
                    X-ray
                        fluorescence spectroscopy
                    Emission spectroscopy
            Analysis
                of raw coalMercury
                    Antimony
                    Arsenic
                    Fluorine
                    Selenium
                    Uranium and Thorium
            Accuracy
                of analytical methods
7. Sample
                preparation
8. Individual
                analytical methodsAnalysis of coal ash
                    Ashing
                    Atomic absorption spectroscopy
                    X-ray
                        fluorescence spectroscopy
                    Emission spectroscopy
9. Analysis of coal ash
10. Ashing
11. Atomic absorption spectroscopy
12. X-ray
                        fluorescence spectroscopy
13. Emission spectroscopy
14. Analysis
                of raw coalMercury
                    Antimony
                    Arsenic
                    Fluorine
                    Selenium
                    Uranium and Thorium
15. Mercury
16. Antimony
17. Arsenic
18. Fluorine
19. Selenium
20. Uranium and Thorium
21. Accuracy
                of analytical methods
22. Comments and
        recommendations
23. References cited

> 

ILLUSTRATION

1. Flow chart showing
        sequence of sample preparation and chemical analysis

> 

TABLES

1. Lower limits of
        determination, six-step spectrographic method
2. Comparative results,
        trace elements in EPA-NBS standard sample of coal
3. Comparison of U.S.
        Geological Survey analyses with Illinois State analyses

---

[ Coal Quality CD ]

---

Created  by the EERT WWW Staff.
<PAGE>
                                                                 Exhibit 10.32




                       AMENDMENT TO STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT

      This Amendment to Stock Option Agreement is dated as of December 31, 2004.

      WHEREAS, [name of Optionee] (the "Optionee") and Waters Corporation, a
Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), are parties to that certain Stock
Option Agreement (the "Agreement"), dated as of December 7, 2000, pursuant to
which the Corporation granted to the Optionee an option (the "Option") to
purchase [insert number of shares] of the Corporation's common stock, par value
$0.01 per share, on the terms and conditions contained therein and in the Waters
Corporation Second Amended and Restated 1996 Long-Term Performance Incentive
Plan (the "Plan");

      WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 10 of the Plan, the Compensation Committee
(the "Committee") of the Corporation's Board of Directors may amend the terms of
the Agreement in its discretion in any manner it deems appropriate (including,
but not limited to, acceleration of the date of exercise of the Option), subject
to the terms and conditions contained therein; and

      WHEREAS, the Corporation, acting through the Committee, has authorized the
amendment of the Agreement, in accordance with Section 10 of the Plan, on the
terms and conditions set forth herein.

      NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and for good
and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the
Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

      1.    Section 2.1 of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and
      replaced with the following:

            "The Option granted hereunder will become 100% vested and fully
            exercisable on December 31, 2004."

      2.    Except as expressly provided in this Amendment, all of the terms and
      provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the
internal laws of the State of New York, without giving effect to principles of
conflicts of laws or choice of law of the State of New York or any other
jurisdiction which would result in the application of the law of any
jurisdiction other than the State of New York.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has executed and delivered this
Amendment under seal, effective as of the date first above written.

                                    WATERS CORPORATION

                                    By: /s/ Douglas Berthiaume
                                        Chairman, President and Chief Executive
                                        Officer
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I,Lawrence Kong, certify that:

1. Ihave reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Bidz.com, Inc.;

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date: November 13, 2006 |                    |
|-------------------------|-------------------------|
|                    |                    |
|                    | /s/ Lawrence Kong       |   |
|                    | Lawrence Kong           |
|                    | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
§ 28.191 Payments methods. Acceptable methods of payment or advance deposit for fees specified in § 28.188 are as follows: ( a ) Credit card (Visa, MasterCard, Discover, or American Express): For remittance of payment by credit card, cardholder's name, billing address, credit card number, expiration date, etc. are required.
( b ) Wire transfers/Electronic Fund Transfers (EFT): Electronic payments are processed through the Federal Reserve Bank. Customer/company name and government issued identification number are required. All fees associated with wire transfers/EFT are the responsibility of the remitter. Orders will not be processed until the total amount of the order is collected.
( c ) Check: Checks must be drawn on a United States bank in United States currency and include the bank routing number on the check. Checks should be made payable to “USDA, AMS, Cotton and Tobacco Program”.
[81 FR 7031, Feb. 10, 2016]
98-1482.

#### State v. Hill.

Hamilton App. No. C-950581. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Annual Report of CKX, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K forthe year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert F.X. Sillerman,Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or l5(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

Date:March  13, 2006

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/  ROBERT F. X. SILLERMAN              |   |   |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   |   | Robert  F. X. Sillerman                            |   |
|   |   | Chairman  of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|   |   | (Principal  Executive Officer)                     |   |

 

 

Thiscertification accompanies this Report on Form 10-K pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required bysuch Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signaturethat appears in typed form with the electronic version of this writtenstatement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CMC
SECURITIES CORPORATION I'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 559,254
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               40
<BONDS>                                        559,254
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                        (50)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   559,254
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                45,361
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,482
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              43,902
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (23)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (23)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (23)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 1940

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1940 appear at 80 FR 9876, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1940.1000 OMB control number.

The collection of information requirements contained in this regulation has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget and assigned OMB control number 0575-0145. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to vary from 30 minutes to 48 hours per response with an average of 4 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Agriculture, Clearance Officer, OIRM, Room 404-W, Washington, DC 20250; and to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

RANDY A. NELSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D2023-1862

[June 27, 2024]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Howard K. Coates, Jr., 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 501997CF011019A.

W. Charles Fletcher, Jacksonville, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KLINGENSMITH, C.J., MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### RIESGO v. CLARK et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 8, 1906.)

Action by Louis A. Riesgo against James F. A. Clark and others.

No opinion. Motion denied. Order filed.