alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Subchapter C of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter C appear by Amdt. 381, 65 FR 64586, Oct. 30, 2000.

Editorial Note on Part 279
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 279 appear at 68 FR 41052, July 10, 2003.

§ 279.7 Judicial review. ( a ) *Filing for judicial review.* Except for firms disqualified from the program in accordance with § 278.6(e)(8) of this chapter, a firm aggrieved by the determination of the designated reviewer may obtain judicial review of the determination by filing a complaint against the United States in the U.S. district court for the district in which the owner resides or is engaged in business, or in any court of record of the State having competent jurisdiction. The complaint must be filed within 30 days after the date of delivery or service upon the firm of the notice of determination of the designated reviewer in accordance with § 279.5(e); otherwise the determination shall be final.
( b ) *Summons and complaint.* Service of the summons and complaint in any such action shall be made in accordance with the rules of civil procedure for the U.S. district courts. The copy of the summons and complaint required by the rules to be served on the agency whose order is being attacked shall be sent by using any delivery method as long as the method provides evidence of delivery to the person in charge of the applicable regional office of FNS.
( c ) *Trial de novo.* The suit in the U.S. district court or in the State court, as the case may be, shall be a trial de novo by the court in which the court shall determine the validity of the questioned administrative action. If the court determines that the administrative action is invalid, it shall enter a judgment or order which it determines is in accordance with the law and the evidence.
( d ) *Stay of action.* During the pendency of any judicial review, or any appeal therefrom, the administrative action under review shall remain in force unless the firm makes a timely application to the court and after hearing thereon, the court stays the administrative action after a showing that irreparable injury will occur absent a stay and that the firm is likely to prevail on the merits of the case. However, permanent disqualification actions taken in accordance with § 278.6(e)(1) of this chapter shall not be subject to such a stay of administrative action. If the disqualification action is reversed through administrative or judicial review, the Secretary shall not be liable for the value of any sales lost during the disqualification period.
[Amdt. 136, 43 FR 43279, Sept. 22, 1978, as amended by Amdt. 274, 51 FR 18752, May 21, 1986; Amdt. 356, 59 FR 29714, June 9, 1994; 64 FR 23174, Apr. 30, 1999. Redesignated and amended at 68 FR 41053, July 10, 2003; Amdt. 397, 70 FR 72354, Dec. 5, 2005]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG

PRODUCTS LIABILITY 

LITIGATION

This Document Relates to All Cases

Case No. 3:19-md-2885-MCR-GRJ

Judge M. Casey Rodgers

Magistrate Judge Hope T. Cannon

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL

Plaintiffs, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2, Local Rule 5.5, 

and in accordance with Case Management Order No. 29 (MDL Dkt. 2236), move 

the Court for leave to file under seal Plaintiffs’ Opposition to 3M’s Motion for 

Clarification, Exhibit A (Declaration of Christopher Seeger) and Exhibit B 

Declaration of Special Master Randi S. Ellis) to Opposition.

Dated: February 16, 2023

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Bryan F. Aylstock

Bryan F. Aylstock, Lead Counsel

Florida State Bar No. 078263

Aylstock, Witkin, Kreis & Overholtz, PLLC

17 East Main Street

Suite 200

Pensacola, FL 32502

Tel.: (850) 202-1010

baylstock@awkolaw.com

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3669 Filed 02/16/23 Page 1 of 3
2

Christopher A. Seeger, Co-Lead Counsel

(Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

New Jersey State Bar No. 042631990

Seeger Weiss LLP

55 Challenger Road 6th Floor

Ridgefield Park, NJ 07660

Tel.: (212) 584-0700

cseeger@seegerweiss.com

Shelley V. Hutson, Co-Lead Counsel

(Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

Texas State Bar No. 00788878

Clark, Love & Hutson, GP

440 Louisiana Street

Suite 1600

Houston, TX 77002

Tel.: (713) 757-1400

shutson@triallawfirm.com

Brian H. Barr, Co-Liaison Counsel

Levin, Papantonio, Thomas, Mitchell,

Rafferty, & Proctor, P.A.

316 South Baylen Street

Pensacola, FL 32502

Tel.: (850) 435-7044

bbarr@levinlaw.com

Michael A. Burns, Co-Liaison Counsel

Mostyn Law Firm

3810 W. Alabama Street

Houston, TX 77027

Tel.: (713) 714-0000

epefile@mostynlaw.com

Counsel for Plaintiffs

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3669 Filed 02/16/23 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on February 16, 2023, I caused the foregoing Motion 

for Leave to File Under Seal to be filed with the Clerk of the Court using the 

CM/ECF system, which will send notification to all counsel of record.

/s/ Bryan F. Aylstock

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3669 Filed 02/16/23 Page 3 of 3
98-1484.

#### State ex rel. Mills v. Indus. Comm.

Franklin App. No. 97APD07-934. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 223 (Friday, November 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 70934]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29177]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

 Customs and Border Protection


Accreditation of SEA, Ltd., as a Commercial Laboratory

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of accreditation of SEA, Ltd., as a commercial 
laboratory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12, SEA, 
Ltd., 7349 Worthington-Galena Road, Columbus, OH 43085, has been 
accredited to test petroleum and petroleum products for customs 
purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12. Anyone 
wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory analyses should 
request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is 
accredited by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the 
specific test requested. Alternatively, inquires regarding the specific 
test this entity is accredited to perform may be directed to the U.S. 
Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry 
may also be sent to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#107372603e7c71727861507478633e777f66"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="adcecfdd83c1cccfc5dcedc9c5de83cac2db">[email protected]</span></a>. Please reference the Web site 
listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and 
accredited laboratories. 
http:[sol][sol]cbp.gov[sol]xp[sol]cgov[sol]import[sol]operations--
support[sol]labs--scientific--svcs[sol]commercial--gaugers/.

DATES: The accreditation of SEA, Ltd., as commercial laboratory became 
effective on June 22, 2010. The next triennial inspection date will be 
scheduled for June 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony Malana, Laboratories and 
Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-
1060.

    Dated: November 8, 2010.
 Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
[FR Doc. 2010-29177 Filed 11-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Editorial Note on Part 1980
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1980 appear at 80 FR 9905, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1980.425 Availability of credit from other sources. ( a ) Inability to obtain credit elsewhere is not a requirement for guaranteed assistance under this subpart.
( b ) To be eligible for an insured loan under this subpart, the borrower must be unable to obtain the required credit from private or cooperative sources at reasonable rates and terms, taking into consideration prevailing private and cooperative rates and terms in the community in or near the borrower's location(s) for loans for similar purposes and period of time. The borrower's inability to obtain such credit elsewhere will be determined in accordance with subpart A of part 1942 of this chapter.
Editorial Note on Part 1944
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1944 appear at 80 FR 9885, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1944.411 Conditions for approving a grant. A grant may be approved for an eligible applicant when the conditions in the letter of conditions are met and the following conditions are present: ( a ) The applicant has or can hire, or contract directly or indirectly with, qualified people to carry out its responsibilities in administering the grant.
( b ) The applicant has met all of the conditions listed in § 1944.410(e) of this subpart.
( c ) The grantee furnishes a signed statement that it complies with the requirements of the Departmental Regulations found in 2 CFR part 200 as adopted by USDA through 2 CFR part 400.
( d ) A resolution has been adopted by the board of directors which authorizes the appropriate officer to execute exhibit A of this subpart and Form RD 400-4, “Assurance Agreement.”
( e ) The grantee has fidelity bonding as covered in 2 CFR part 200 as adopted by USDA through 2 CFR part 400 if a nonprofit organization or, if a State or local government, to the extent required in 2 CFR part 200 as adopted by USDA through 2 CFR part 400.
( f ) The grantee has agreed by completing SF-424B, “Assurances-Non Construction Programs,” that it will establish a recordkeeping system that is certifiable by a certified public accountant that it adequately meets the Agreement.
( g ) The grantee has established an interest bearing checking account on which at least two bonded officials will sign all checks issued and understands that interest earned in excess of $250.00 annually must be submitted to Rural Development quarterly. (The use of minority depository institutions is encouraged.)
( h ) The grantee has developed an agreement to be executed by the grantee and the self-help participants which clearly sets forth what is expected of each and has incorporated exhibit B-2 of this subpart which clearly shows what work is expected of the participating family.
[55 FR 41833, Oct. 16, 1990; 56 FR 19253, Apr. 26, 1991; 79 FR 76010, Dec. 19, 2014]
**EXHIBIT 32**     The following certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350 and in accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8238. These certifications shall not bedeemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, norshall they be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of1933, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any generalincorporation language in such filing.**Certification of Principal Executive Officer**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Volcom, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, tohis knowledge, that:     (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period endedSeptember 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Dated: November 11, 2005 /s/ Richard R. Woolcott   Richard R. Woolcott   President, Chief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer)   **Certification of Principal Financial Officer**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Volcom, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, tohis knowledge, that:     (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period endedSeptember 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Dated: November 11, 2005 /s/ Douglas P. Collier   Douglas P. Collier   Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer(Principal Financial Officer)        A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toVolcom, Inc. and will be retained by Volcom, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
of CEM Corporation on Form S-8 (File Numbers 33-11952, 33-25739, 33-53694,
33-75366, 33-75368, 33-80136 and 33-87676) of our report dated July 23, 1997, on
our audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
schedule of CEM Corporation as of June 30, 1997 and 1996, and for the years
ended June 30, 1997, 1996 and 1995, which report is included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.


/s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.


Charlotte, North Carolina
September 24, 1997
#### § 1806.27 Acceptable policies and servicing.

The general acceptance of policies and servicing of insurance will be performed in accordance with Subpart A of this part. Any unusual situations that may arise with respect to obtaining or servicing flood insurance should be referred to the State Director. The State Director will attempt to resolve any problems concerning the flood insurance program in the state with the Servicing Company. Flood hazard boundary maps, insurance rate tables, the insurability of specific structures, and other information concerning the program may be obtained from the Servicing Company. Difficulties in administering the program which the State Director is unable to resolve should be referred to the National Office for Assistance.
Vitrinite Reflectance Measurements of Cretaceous 

Outcrop Samples from the Wyoming Thrustbelt, 

Southwestern Wyoming 

by Mark Pawlewicz1

 and Mark Kirschbaum1

This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological 

Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of 

trade names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. 

Government. 

Open-File Report 2004-1360 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 

1

Denver, Colorado 
Vitrinite Reflectance Measurements of Cretaceous Outcrop Samples from the 

Wyoming Thrustbelt, Southwestern Wyoming 

By 

Mark Pawlewicz and Mark Kirschbaum 

Eleven outcrop samples from the Wyoming thrustbelt region in southwestern 

Wyoming (fig. 1) were collected for analysis as part of the U.S. Geological Survey’s 

ongoing oil and gas assessment project for selected basins in the western United States. 

The samples are all Cretaceous in age (fig. 2). Latitude and longitude data were obtained 

with a global positioning system unit. The lithology of these samples is either mudstone 

or coal. 

 The samples were examined with a reflected light microscope to determine their 

degree of thermal maturity by vitrinite reflectance. Sample quality and abundance of 

organic matter were good except for one mudstone (number 3 in table 1) where the 

presence of organic matter was reduced because of its lithology. The results of the 

analyses are listed in table 1. 


Table 1. Mean vitrinite reflectance values and locations for Wyoming thrustbelt samples in southwestern Wyoming.

[Map no. refers to numbers plotted in figure 1. Ro, vitrinite reflectance in percent; n, number of measurements; Ceno., Cenomanian; Fm, Formation; Mbr, Member.] 

Map no. Formation Age Longitude Latitude Lithology State County Ro (mea

1 Bear River Fm. Albian -110.8641 41.1635 mudstone WY Uinta 0.54 2 Frontier Fm, Dry Hollow Mbr. Cenomanian -110.5245 41.9862 coal WY Lincoln 0.57 3 Aspen Shale Albian/Ceno. -110.4806 41.8756 mudstone WY Lincoln 0.84 4 Frontier Fm, Dry Hollow Mbr. Cenomanian -110.5309 41.8352 coal WY Lincoln 0.55 5 Adaville Formation Campanian -110.6028 41.8043 coal WY Lincoln 0.46 6 Aspen Shale Albian/Ceno. -110.5005 41.7438 mudstone WY Lincoln 0.67 7 Frontier Fm, Dry Hollow Mbr. Cenomanian -110.5337 41.7491 coal WY Lincoln 0.49 8 Frontier Fm, Chalk Creek Mbr. Cenomanian -110.535 41.6962 coal WY Lincoln 0.57 9 Frontier Fm, Chalk Creek Mbr. Cenomanian -110.0592 41.5772 coal WY Uinta 0.59 

10 Frontier Fm, Chalk Creek Mbr. Cenomanian -110.6000 41.4818 coal WY Uinta 0.54 11 Frontier Fm, Oyster Ridge Mbr. Cenomanian -110.675 41.3364 coal WY Uinta 0.47
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-2196

JENNIFER RAQUEL TAYLOR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

KATHERINE H. TIFFANY, Administrative Officer; GREENVILLE COUNTY 

CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT; KAREN MCMANAWAY, LLC/Lawyer,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Greenville. Joseph Dawson, III, District Judge. (6:20-cv-02291-JD)

Submitted: January 20, 2022 Decided: January 24, 2022

Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jennifer Raquel Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-2196 Doc: 6 Filed: 01/24/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Jennifer Raquel Taylor appeals the district court’s order accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Taylor’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 

complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). On appeal, we confine our review to the 

issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Taylor’s informal brief 

does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, she has forfeited appellate 

review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014)

(“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is 

limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s 

judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 21-2196 Doc: 6 Filed: 01/24/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Chardan North China Acquisition
Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30,
2005 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof, I Li Zhang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.


By:  /s/ Li Zhang                                       Dated: November 14, 2005
  -----------------------------------
        Li Zhang
        Chief Executive Officer
        (Principal Executive Officer)
§ 235.8 Management evaluations and audits. ( a ) Unless otherwise exempt, audits at the State level shall be conducted in accordance with 2 CFR part 200, subpart F and Appendix XI, Compliance Supplement and USDA implementing regulations 2 CFR part 400 and part 415.
( b ) While OIG shall rely to the fullest extent feasible upon State sponsored audits, it shall, whenever considered necessary, ( 1 ) perform on-site test audits, and
( 2 ) review audit reports and related working papers of audits performed by or for State agencies.
( c ) Each State agency shall provide FNS with full opportunity to conduct management evaluations of all operations of the State agency under this part and shall provide OIG with full opportunity to conduct audits of all such operations. Each State agency shall make available its records, including records of the receipt and expenditure of funds, upon a reasonable request by FNS, OIG, or the U.S. Comptroller General.
(Sec. 7, Pub. L. 95-627, 92 Stat. 3621 (42 U.S.C. 1776); secs. 804, 805, 812, 814, 816, 817 and 819, Pub. L. 97-35, 95 Stat. 521-535 (42 U.S.C. 1753, 1754, 1756, 1759, 1759a, 1771, 1773, 1774, 1776, and 1785))
[41 FR 32405, Aug. 3, 1976, as amended at 44 FR 51186, Aug. 31, 1979; Amdt. 7, 47 FR 18567, Apr. 30, 1982; Amdt. 9, 48 FR 195, Jan. 4, 1983; 54 FR 2991, Jan. 23, 1989; 71 FR 39519, July 13, 2006; 81 FR 66493, Sept. 28, 2016]
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> 
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the 
Statement of Financial Condition at October 31, 1995 (Audited) and the 
Statement of Income for the Year Ended October 31, 1995 (Audited) It is 
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                    <C>                   
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          YEAR 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      Oct-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                           Oct-31-1995
<CASH>                                       9,078
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                               59,776
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                120,697
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           249,696
<PP&E>                                     192,887
<DEPRECIATION>                             145,596
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             304,877
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      256,000
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   280,618
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               304,877
<SALES>                                    376,746
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           376,746
<CGS>                                      117,489
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              633,327
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            17,967
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (437,865)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              0
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                              (437,865)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (0.07)

</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 09-1705

UNITED STATES,

Appellee,

v.

JAMES DAMON,

Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on February 18, 2010, is

amended as follows:

On page 8, line 4, "2006" should be replaced with "2005".