71078 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 224 / Monday, November 22, 2010 / Notices 

A. Export or reexport to or on behalf 

of a Denied Person any item subject to 

the EAR; 

B. Take any action that facilitates the 

acquisition or attempted acquisition by 

a Denied Person of the ownership, 

possession, or control of any item 

subject to the EAR that has been or will 

be exported from the United States, 

including financing or other support 

activities related to a transaction 

whereby a Denied Person acquires or 

attempts to acquire such ownership, 

possession or control; 

C. Take any action to acquire from or 

to facilitate the acquisition or attempted 

acquisition from a Denied Person of any 

item subject to the EAR that has been 

exported from the United States; 

D. Obtain from a Denied Person in the 

United States any item subject to the 

EAR with knowledge or reason to know 

that the item will be, or is intended to 

be, exported from the United States; or 

E. Engage in any transaction to service 

any item subject to the EAR that has 

been or will be exported from the 

United States and which is owned, 

possessed or controlled by a Denied 

Person, or service any item, of whatever 

origin, that is owned, possessed or 

controlled by a Denied Person if such 

service involves the use of any item 

subject to the EAR that has been or will 

be exported from the United States. For 

purposes of this paragraph, servicing 

means installation, maintenance, repair, 

modification or testing. 

Third, that, after notice and 

opportunity for comment as provided in 

section 766.23 of the EAR, any other 

person, firm, corporation, or business 

organization related to a Denied Person 

by affiliation, ownership, control, or 

position of responsibility in the conduct 

of trade or related services may also be 

made subject to the provisions of this 

Order. 

Fourth, that this Order does not 

prohibit any export, reexport, or other 

transaction subject to the EAR where the 

only items involved that are subject to 

the EAR are the foreign-produced direct 

product of U.S.-origin technology. 

In accordance with the provisions of 

Section 766.24(e) of the EAR, the 

Respondents may, at any time, appeal 

this Order by filing a full written 

statement in support of the appeal with 

the Office of the Administrative Law 

Judge, U.S. Coast Guard ALJ Docketing 

Center, 40 South Gay Street, Baltimore, 

Maryland 21202–4022. 

BIS may seek renewal of this Order by 

filing a written request with the 

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for 

Export Enforcement in accordance with 

the provisions of Section 766.24(d) of 

the EAR, which currently provides that 

such a written request must be 

submitted not later than 20 days before 

the expiration date. A Respondent may 

oppose a request to renew this Order in 

accordance with Section 766.24(d), 

including by filing a written submission 

with the Assistant Secretary of 

Commerce for Export Enforcement, 

supported by appropriate evidence. Any 

opposition ordinarily must be received 

not later than seven days before the 

expiration date of the Order. 

Notice of the issuance of this Order 

shall be given to Respondents in 

accordance with Sections 766.5(b) and 

766.24(b)(5) of the Regulations. This 

Order also shall be published in the 

Federal Register. 

This Order is effective immediately 

and shall remain in effect for 180 days. 

Issued this 15th day of November 2010. 

David W. Mills, 

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export 

Enforcement. 

[FR Doc. 2010–29327 Filed 11–19–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DT–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–570–938] 

Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts 

From People’s Republic of China: 

Partial Rescission of Countervailing 

Duty Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: November 22, 

2010. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Seth 

Isenberg or Patricia Tran, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 1, Import 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone (202) 482–0588 and (202) 

482–1503, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On May 3, 2010, the U.S. Department 

of Commerce (‘‘Department’’) issued a 

notice of opportunity to request an 

administrative review of this order for 

the period of review (‘‘POR’’) September 

19, 2008, through December 31, 2009. 

See Antidumping or Countervailing 

Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation; Opportunity To Request 

Administrative Review, 75 FR 23236–37 

(May 3, 2010). On June 1, 2010, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b), the 

Department received a timely request 

from Archer Daniels Midland Company, 

Cargill, Incorporated, and Tate & Lyle 

Americas LLC (collectively, 

‘‘Petitioners’’) to conduct an 

administrative review of 56 companies. 

On June 30, 2010, the Department 

published the notice of initiation of this 

countervailing duty administrative 

review, covering the 56 companies. See 

Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews and Requests for Revocation in 

Part, 75 FR 37759 (June 30, 2010). On 

August 17, 2010, the Department issued 

a respondent selection memorandum 

selecting RZBC Co., Ltd./RZBC Import & 

Export Co., Ltd. and RZBC (Juxian) Co., 

Ltd. (collectively, ‘‘RZBC’’); and Yixing 

Union Biochemical Co., Ltd. and Yixing 

Union Cogeneration Co., Ltd. 

(collectively, ‘‘Yixing-Union’’) as 

mandatory respondents. See 

Memorandum to Susan H. Kuhbach 

from Patricia M. Tran, regarding 

Respondent Selection: Countervailing 

Duty Administrative Review—Citric 

Acid and Certain Citrate Salts (August 

17, 2010). 

Partial Rescission of Countervailing 

Duty Administrative Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the 

Secretary will rescind an administrative 

review, in whole or in part, if the party 

who requested the administrative 

review withdraws the request within 90 

days of the date of publication of the 

notice of initiation of the requested 

administrative review. On September 

27, 2010, Petitioners withdrew their 

request for an administrative review of 

the following companies: 

A.H.A. International Co., Ltd. 

Changsha Huari Bio Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. 

Changsha Huayang Chemical Co., Ltd. 

China North Industry Guangzhou 

Corporation 

Feiyu Fine Chemical 

Gansu Xuejing Biochemical Co., Ltd. 

Great Vision International 

Hai Hui Group Co., Ltd. 

High Hope International Group Jiangsu 

Native 

Produce Import & Export Co., Ltd. 

Huangshi Xinghua Biochemical Co., Ltd. 

Hunan Dongting Citric Acid Chemicals Co., 

Ltd. 

Hunan Yinhai Petrochemicals Group Co., 

Ltd. 

Jiali Bio Group (Qingdao) Limited 

Jiangsu Gadot Nuobei Biochemical 

Jiangsu Nuobei Biochemical Co., Ltd. 

Juxian Hongde Citric Acid Co., Ltd. 

Kelong International Co., Ltd. 

Laiwu Taihe Biochemistry Co. Ltd. 

Lianyungang Best Biochemical Technology 

Co. Ltd. 

Lianyungang Famous Chemical, Ltd. 

Lianyungang JF International Trade Co., Ltd. 

Lianyungang Nuobei Biochemical 

Technology Co., Ltd. 

Lianyungang Reliance 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 224 / Monday, November 22, 2010 / Notices 71079 

Lianyungang Samin Food Additives Co., Ltd. 

Lianyungang Shuren Scientific Creation 

Import & Export Co., Ltd. 

Linyi Bangtai Industry (Group) Co., Ltd. 

Nantong Apac Best Biochemical Corp. 

Nantong Huaze Chemical Co., Ltd. 

Nantong Jiangei Additive 

Penglai Marine Bio-Technology Co., Ltd. 

Qingdao Fuso Refining and Processing Co., 

Ltd. 

Qinhuangdao Sinochem Import & Export Co., 

Ltd. 

Roche Zhongya (Wuxi) Citric Acid, Ltd. 

Rugao Jinling Chemical Co., Ltd. 

Shanxi Shunyi Co., Ltd. 

Shandong Hongshide Chemical Industry Co., 

Ltd. 

Shandong Laiwu Gangcheng Group 

Shandong Ningmeng Biochemistry Co., Ltd. 

Shandong Yingfeng Chemical Industry Group 

Co., Ltd. 

Shanghai Henglijie Bio-Tech Co., Ltd. 

Shanghai Fenhe Biochemical Co., Ltd. 

Shanxi Rui Cheng Yellow River Industry, 

Ltd. 

Shihezi City Changyun Biochemical Co., Ltd. 

Sinochem Corporation 

Sinochem Hebei Import & Export Co. 

Sinochem Lianyungang Import & Export Co. 

Sinochem Tianjin Import & Export Co. 

Suntran Industrial Group, Ltd. 

Tianyu Chemical Co., Ltd. 

The TNN Development Limited 

TTCA Co., Ltd. 

Weifang Ensign Industry Co., Ltd. 

Weifang Huiyuan Industry Co., Ltd. 

Wuhan Shuangfeng Citric Acid Co., Ltd. 

(collectively, ‘‘Rescinded Companies.’’) 

Because Petitioners withdrew their 

request of the Rescinded Companies 

within the 90-day period and no other 

party requested review of the Rescinded 

Companies, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(1), we are rescinding the 

review of the Rescinded Companies. 

This administrative review will 

continue with respect to RZBC and 

Yixing-Union. 

Assessment Instructions 

The Department will instruct U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) 

to assess countervailing duties on all 

appropriate entries. For the Rescinded 

Companies, countervailing duties shall 

be assessed at rates equal to the cash 

deposit or bonding rate of the estimated 

countervailing duties required at the 

time of entry, or withdrawal from 

warehouse, for consumption, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department 

intends to issue appropriate assessment 

instructions directly to CBP 15 days 

after publication of this notice. 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: November 12, 2010. 

Susan H. Kuhbach, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2010–29298 Filed 11–19–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

Site Renumbering Notice; ForeignTrade Zone 29—Louisville, KY 

Foreign-Trade Zone 29 was approved 

by the FTZ Board on May 26, 1977 

(Board Order 118, 42 FR 29323, 6/8/77), 

and expanded on January 31, 1989 

(Board Order 429, 54 FR 5992, 2/7/89), 

December 15, 1997 (Board Order 941, 62 

FR 67044, 12/23/97), July 17, 1998 

(Board Order 995, 63 FR 40878, 7/31/ 

98), December 11, 2000 (Board Order 

1133, 65 FR 79802, 12/20/00), January 

15, 2002 (Board Order 1204, 67 FR 4391, 

12/30/02), November 20, 2003 (Board 

Order 1305, 68 FR 67400, 12/2/2003), 

and January 27, 2005 (Board Order 

1364, 70 FR 6616, 2/8/2005). 

FTZ 29 currently consists of 13 ‘‘sites’’ 

totaling 5,659 acres in the Louisville 

area. The current update does not alter 

the physical boundaries that have 

previously been approved, but instead 

involves an administrative renumbering 

that separates certain non-contiguous 

sites for record-keeping purposes. 

Under this revision, the site list for 

FTZ 29 will be as follows: Site 1 (1,643 

acres)—located within the Riverport 

Industrial Complex (includes 247 acres 

along Johnsontown Road, adjacent to 

the Riverport Industrial Complex and 

130 acres at Greenbelt and Logistics 

Drive, adjacent to the northern 

boundary of the Riverport Industrial 

Complex); Site 2 (564 acres)—located at 

the junction of Gene Snyder Freeway 

and La Grange Road in eastern Jefferson 

County; Site 3 (142 acres, 1,629,000 sq. 

ft.)—located at 5403 Southside Drive, 

Louisville; Site 4 (2,149 acres) at the 

Louisville International Airport 

(includes the Airport’s industrial park 

area, 94 acres at the Dixie Warehouse & 

Cartage Co. public warehousing facility 

located at Grade Lane [formerly Site 4, 

Parcel B], and 475 acres at the UPS 

Global Port Package Sorting Facility and 

Airport Tank Farm and maintenance 

facility [formerly part of Site 4, Parcel 

C]); Site 5 (69 acres)—the Marathon 

Ashland Petroleum LLC Tank Farm (1.3 

million barrels) and pipelines, located at 

4510 Algonquin Parkway along the Ohio 

River, Louisville, which supplies part of 

the airport’s fuel system; Site 6 (316 

acres)—Cedar Grove Business Park, on 

Highway 480, near Interstate 65, 

Shepherdsville, Bullitt County; Site 7 

(191 acres)—Henderson County 

Riverport Authority facilities, 6200 

Riverport Road, Henderson; Site 8 (182 

acres)—Owensboro Riverport Authority 

facilities, 2300 Harbor Road, 

Owensboro; Site 9 (82 acres)—two 

parcels within the 4 Star Regional 

Business Park (expires 11/30/11) 

(includes 42 acres located at Southern 

Star Way, and 40 acres located at 2001 

Northern Star Way, Robards); Site 10 (25 

acres)—Global Port Business Park, 6201 

Global Distribution Way, Louisville; Site 

11 (261 acres)—Outer Loop, Louisville, 

including a warehousing facility located 

at Stennett Lane (116 acres), 8100 Air 

Commerce Drive (44 acres) [formerly 

Site 4, Parcel C] and the Louisville 

Metro Commerce Center, 1900 Outer 

Loop Road (101 acres) (includes 

portions of two buildings located at 

2240 and 2250 Outer Loop Road) 

[formerly Site 4, Parcel D]; Site 12 (29 

acres)—Salt River Business Park, 376 

Zappos Blvd., Shepherdsville, Bullitt 

County [formerly part of Site 6]; and, 

Site 13 (6 acres)—Custom Quality 

Services located at 3401 Jewell Avenue 

[formerly Site 1a]. 

For further information, contact 

Elizabeth Whiteman at 

Elizabeth.Whiteman@trade.gov or (202) 

482–0473. 

Dated: November 16, 2010. 

Andrew McGilvray, 

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2010–29383 Filed 11–19–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Office of the Secretary 

Determination on Use of Cooperative 

Threat Reduction Funds in Pakistan 

and Afghanistan Under Section 1308 of 

the National Defense Authorization Act 

for Fiscal Year 2004 

AGENCY: Department of Defense. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

requirements of Section 1308 of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal year 2004 (Pub. L. 108–136) as 

amended by Section 1305 of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for 

Fiscal year 2008 (Pub. L. 110–181), the 

Secretary of Defense has determined 

that the obligation and expenditure of 

Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) 

funds for the implementation of CTR 

programs in Pakistan and Afghanistan 

will permit the United States to take 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES