alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane lunani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J OS E L UI S R OS AL E S C AR T AG E NA , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 73597 A ge nc yN o. A 070- 460- 868 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d O c t obe r19, 2010 ** S an F r an c is c o , C a lif

o rn ia B efo re: O ’ S C A N N L A IN , T A L L M A N , an dB E A , C i rcu i tJu d g es. J os e L ui s R os a l e s C art e ge na , ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of E lS a l va dor , pe t i t i ons for r evi ew of the deci si on of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s w hi ch di sm i ss ed hi s appe a lf

r om the i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s de ni a lof hi s appl i c a t i ons f

ora s y l um and w ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l. 

# FI LED OC T 22 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 73597 2 W e r e j e c tR os a l e s C art e ge na ’ s c l a i m tha the i s e l i gi bl e f ora s y l um ba s e d on hi s m em bers hi p i n a part i cul arsoci algrou p, nam el y per sons w ho suff er pe r s e c ut i on due t o gang a c t i vi ty , ar i s i ng f r om hi s f e arof gangs i f he r e f us e s t o be recru i t edi n t o g an g s; an dth e E lS al v ad o r g o v ern m en t ’ s i n ab i l i ty t o co n tro lg an g s. See San tos-L em us v. Mukasey , 5 4 2 F . 3 d7 3 8 , 7 4 5 -4 6 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 8 ) (rej ect i n g as a soci algrou p “ youn g m en i n E lS al vado r r es i st i ng gang vi ol ence ”) . W e a l so re j ec t R o s a le s C arte g e n a ’s p o litic a l o p in io n c la im b a s e do n h is r e s is tan c e to th e g an g s . Se e I N S v . E l i as - Zac ar i as , 50 2 U . S . 47 8, 48 2-84 (199 2) (r es i st i ng forc ed re crui tm entdo es no tnece ss ar i l y c on st i tut e per se cut i on on ac coun tof po l i t i ca l o p in io n ) ; B arri os v. H

older , 5 8 1 F .3 d8 4 9 , 8 5 4 - 5 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) ( r e s is tan c e to gang re crui tm entdo es no tconst i tut e pol i t i ca lop i ni on ). B ec ause R osal es C art egena fa i l ed t o d em on strat e thathe w as pers ec ut ed on ac coun tof a prot ec t ed g r o u n d , w e up h o ldth e a g e n c y ’s d e n ia l o f h is w ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l c la im . I

d. at 8 5 6 . PETI TI O N FO R R EVI EW D EN I ED .
#### § 1806.26 Coverage and premium rates.

Exhibit A sets forth limits of coverage and chargeable premium rates under the program. Insurance policies under the program can be obtained from any licensed property insurance agent or broker serving the eligible community or from the National Flood Insurers Association Serving Company (Serving Company) for the state. The Servicing Company for each state is shown in exhibit B.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1791 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to codify authority under 

existing grant guidance authorizing use of Urban Area Security Initiative 

and State Homeland Security Grant Program funding for enhancing 

medical preparedness, medical surge capacity, and mass prophylaxis capabilities. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2013 

Mr. BILIRAKIS (for himself, Mrs. BROOKS of Indiana, and Mr. KING of New 

York) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to codify 

authority under existing grant guidance authorizing use 

of Urban Area Security Initiative and State Homeland 

Security Grant Program funding for enhancing medical 

preparedness, medical surge capacity, and mass prophylaxis capabilities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medical Preparedness 

5 Allowable Use Act’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1791 IH

1 SEC. 2. USE OF CERTAIN HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT 

2 FUNDS FOR ENHANCING MEDICAL PRE3 PAREDNESS, MEDICAL SURGE CAPACITY, 

4 AND MASS PROPHYLAXIS CAPABILITIES. 

5 Section 2008 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 

6 (6 U.S.C. 609) is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (a), by redesignating para8 graphs (10) through (13) as paragraphs (11) 

9 through (14), respectively, and by inserting after 

10 paragraph (9) the following: 

11 ‘‘(10) enhancing medical preparedness, medical 

12 surge capacity, and mass prophylaxis capabilities, in13 cluding the development and maintenance of an ini14 tial pharmaceutical stockpile, including medical kits, 

15 and diagnostics sufficient to protect first responders, 

16 their families, and immediate victims from a chem17 ical or biological event;’’; and 

18 (2) in subsection (b)(3)(B), by striking 

19 ‘‘(a)(10)’’ and inserting ‘‘(a)(11)’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 12.1  CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  I, P. Redmond ODonoghue, certify that:  (1)I have reviewed this annual report on
Form 20-F of Waterford Wedgwood plc and Waterford Wedgwood UK plc;  (2)Based on my knowledge, this report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;  (3)Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the companies as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;  (4)The companies other certifying officer
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
companies and have:  (a)Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
companies, including their consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
annual report is being prepared;  (b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the
companies disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure control and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and  (c)Disclosed in this report any change in
the companies internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the companies internal control over
financial reporting;  (5)The companies other certifying officer
and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the companies auditors and the audit committee of
the companies boards of directors:  (a)All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which could adversely affect the companies ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
companies internal control over financial reporting.   Date: September 30, 2004Signature:
  /s/ P. REDMOND
  ODONOGHUETitle: Chief Executive Officer
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS

*April*7, *2006*

[Cite as *04/07/2006 Case Announcements,*2006-Ohio-1731.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2004-1832.

#### State ex rel. Bandlow v. LeBarron.

In Mandamus. This cause came on for further consideration of relators’ motion for relief from judgment. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion is denied.
#### § 27.24 Delivery of samples of cotton.

The original sample from each bale to be classified shall be delivered to the Marketing Services Office with which the classification request was filed, at its classification room. If there is no Marketing Services Office at the point where the cotton is sampled, the supervisor of cotton inspection or the exchange inspection agency shall forward the samples to the proper Marketing Services Office. No samples covered by pending classification requests which are ready for delivery as provided for herein shall be withheld from such delivery except as authorized in writing by the Area Director or the Director.

[48 FR 49210, Oct. 25, 1983]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS ) CASE NO. 3:19-MD-2885

EARPLUG PRODUCTS )

LIABILITY LITIGATION ) INDIV. DOCKET: 7:20cv93-MCR/GRJ

)

THIS RELATES TO: )

)

MARCUS HENSEL )

v. )

3M COMPANY ET AL. )

NOTICE OF DESIGNATED FORUM

Pursuant to this Court’s orders, PTO’s 22, 29, and 30, Plaintiff Marcus Hensley hereby 

designates his forum as the Western District of Missouri.

Dated: March 20, 2020

/s Taylor C. Bartlett

Taylor C. Bartlett

Heninger Garrison Davis, LLC

2224 First Avenue North

Birmingham, AL 35213

Phone: 205.427.6630

Fax: 205-380-8085

taylor@hgdlawfirm.com

Attorney for Plaintiff

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I CERTIFY that this document was filed via CM/ECF on March 20, 2020, for electronic 

distribution to the counsel of record in this action.

/s/ Taylor C. Bartlett

Attorney for Plaintiff

Case 7:20-cv-00093-MCR-GRJ Document 5 Filed 03/20/20 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1**Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906**In connection with the quarterly report of Orchids Paper Products Company (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert A. Snyder, Chief Executive Officer and President of theCompany, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and Section 1350 ofChapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.       /s/ Robert A. Snyder Robert A. Snyder    Chief Executive Officer and President    May 2, 2008
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 21-40663

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Rubicel Cardenas-Mendoza, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:21-CR-151-1

Before Jolly, Willett, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Rubicel Cardenas-Mendoza has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 

(5th Cir. 2011). Cardenas-Mendoza has filed a response. We have reviewed 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 10, 2022

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 21-40663 Document: 00516234132 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/10/2022
No. 21-40663

2

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as 

well as Cardenas-Mendoza’s response. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate 

review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, 

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is

DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 21-40663 Document: 00516234132 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/10/2022
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997<F1>
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           3,181
<SECURITIES>                                     3,600
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,558
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,016
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,857
<PP&E>                                           5,474
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  28,425
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,973
<BONDS>                                          1,392
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           177
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,829
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    28,425
<SALES>                                         14,782
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,782
<CGS>                                            6,757
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,757
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,088
<INCOME-TAX>                                       377
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                711
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       711
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20
<FN>
<F1>THE RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO REFLECT ANY CHANGES
DUE TO FAS 128.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
§ 1902.3 Procedures to follow in fund disbursement. ( a ) The Servicing Official will determine during loan approval the amount(s) of loan or grant disbursement(s)—full or partial—and will process the request to the appropriate automated system in accordance with 7 CFR part 2018, subpart D.
( b ) When Treasury check(s) are delivered to the Servicing Official, the Servicing Official will make sure that the name of the borrower and the amount(s) of check(s) coincide with the request on file. The Servicing Official should be sure that the check is properly endorsed to ensure payment to the intended recipient. Examples of such restrictive endorsements are: ( 1 ) “For Deposit only to Account No. (Number of Construction Account) of (*Name of Borrower*) in (*Name of Financial Institution*).”
( 2 ) “Pay to the order of (3rd party payee)”—(Contractor, Developer, Sub-Contractor, Building Supply House, etc.) for the purpose of __________.
( c ) When necessary, and only under the circumstances listed in § 1902.2, the Servicing Official will establish, or cause to be established, a supervised bank account. Funds deposited in a supervised bank account are to be recorded and accounted for on Form RD 402-2, “Statement of Deposits and Withdrawals”.
[46 FR 36106, July 14, 1981, as amended at 53 FR 26588, July 14, 1988; 53 FR 35670, Sept. 14, 1988; 54 FR 39727, Sept. 28, 1989; 70 FR 59226, Oct. 12, 2005]
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 21.1



                        SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


     As of June 30, 1998, FX Chicago, Inc. (formerly Index Futures Group, Inc.),
a Delaware Corporation, and IFX/Telcom, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, are 
wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Registrant. IFX, Limited (formerly Index FX
Ltd.), a British Corporation, and Stark Research, Inc., an Illinois corporation,
are majority-owned subsidiaries of the Registrant. As of June 30, 1998, IMSI,
Inc. (formerly Index Management Services, Inc.), an Illinois corporation, is the
only subsidiary of FX Chicago, Inc. and is wholly-owned.
EPA ICR No. 2195.04 OMB Control No. 2070

- 0169

Attachment G

Display Related to OMB Control #2070

- 0169 Listings of Related Regulations in 40 CFR 9.1

As of May 10, 1993, the OMB approval numbers for EPA regulations in Chapter I of Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) appear in a listing in 40 CFR 9.1 (58 FR 27472). This listing fulfills the display requirements in section 3507(f) of the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) for EPA regulations. The listing at 40 CFR 9.1 displays this OMB Control number for the following regulations:

Program Title
Protections for Test Subjects in Human Research

40 CFR Citation

26.11 2 5........................................................................

........... 2070

- 0169 OMB Control No.

26.1303...................................................................................2070

- 0169
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE GRIMALDI,

Petitioner-Appellant,

 v.

K. HOLLAND,

Respondent-Appellee.

No. 14-56888

D.C. No. 2:14-cv-03729-JVS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

James V. Selna, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 27, 2016** 

Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

California state prisoner Jose Grimaldi appeals from the district court’s

judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review de novo a dismissal for failure to exhaust, see

FILED

OCT 03 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Rhoades v. Henry, 638 F.3d 1027, 1034 (9th Cir. 2010), and we vacate and

remand. 

Grimaldi contends that the district court erred in dismissing his habeas

petition as unexhausted because it had discretion to stay the proceedings. After the

district court dismissed Grimaldi’s petition, this court held in Mena v. Long, 813

F.3d 907, 912 (9th Cir. 2016), that “a district court has the discretion to stay and

hold in abeyance fully unexhausted petitions under the circumstances set forth in

Rhines [v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269 (2005)].” We, therefore, vacate and remand for the

district court to determine in the first instance whether Grimaldi is entitled to a stay

and for any further proceedings. 

We express no opinion as to the merits of Grimaldi’s claims, or whether the

procedural requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d) are satisfied or Grimaldi is entitled

to equitable tolling. 

All pending motions are denied as moot.

VACATED and REMANDED.

2 14-56888
Exhibit 10.27


Exhibit 10.27

McMoRan EXPLORATION
CO.

DIRECTOR
COMPENSATION







Cash
Compensation




Each
non-employee director and advisory director receives
an annual fee of $15,000. Committee chairs receive an additional annual fee as
follows: Audit Committee, $3,000; all other committees, $2,000. 




Each
non-employee director and each advisory director receives a fee of $1,000 for
attending each board and committee meeting (for which he is a member) and is
also reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending such
meetings. Each employee director receives a fee of $1,000 for attending each
board meeting. 




1998
Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors and 2004 Director Compensation
Plan




The
company provides equity compensation to the non-employee directors and advisory
directors through two incentive plans, the 1998 Stock Option Plan for
Non-Employee Directors (the 1998 Plan) and the 2004 Director Compensation Plan
(the 2004 Plan), both of which were approved by our stockholders. The 1998 Plan
provides for the annual grant of options to acquire 3,500 shares of our common
stock to each non-employee director, and will be used until the shares available
for issuance are depleted. The 2004 Plan provides for an annual grant of options
to acquire 3,500 shares of our common stock to each advisory director, and will
provide for similar grants to our non-employee directors upon depletion of the
1998 Plan. The referenced option grants under both plans are made on June
1st of each
year. The options are granted at fair market value on the grant date, vest
ratably over the first four anniversaries of the grant date and expire on the
tenth anniversary of the grant date. 




In
addition, the 2004 Plan provides that non-employee directors and advisory
directors may elect to exchange all or a portion of their annual fee for an
equivalent number of shares of our common stock on the payment date, based on
the fair market value of our common stock on such date. The 2004 Plan further
provides that non-employee directors and advisory directors may elect to defer
all or a portion of their annual fee and meeting fees, and that such deferred
amounts will accrue interest at a rate equal to the prime commercial lending
rate announced from time to time by JP Morgan Chase (compounded quarterly), and
shall be paid out at such time or times as directed by the
participant.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
ART. 5 FDS FOR 10-K
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>  1,000
       
<S>                                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                          APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                                        533
<SECURITIES>                                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              18,410
<ALLOWANCES>                                                1,809
<INVENTORY>                                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                0
<PP&E>                                                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             14,960
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                           0
<BONDS>                                                    24,128
<COMMON>                                                    1,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                           0
<PREFERRED>                                                     0
<OTHER-SE>                                                (13,248)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               14,960
<SALES>                                                     2,546
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            2,546
<CGS>                                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              886
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            1,044
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          2,155
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            (1,539)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        (1,539)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                 0
<CHANGES>                                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                               (1,539)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   0
        

</TABLE>