alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


                                                                   
<ARTICLE>                     5

<LEGEND>                          
     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
financial  statements  of  News  Communications,  Inc.  and  subsidiaries  as of
November  30,  1996  and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

       
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                   <C>  

<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    NOV-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                       DEC-1-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                         NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                               1,494,887
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        4,725,020
<ALLOWANCES>                                         862,615
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     5,700,127
<PP&E>                                               1,387,500
<DEPRECIATION>                                       866,709
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       9,711,124
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                3,554,356
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          200,449
<COMMON>                                             80,380
<OTHER-SE>                                           4,808,378
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         9,711,124
<SALES>                                              18,334,866
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     18,334,866
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        21,972,383
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   (177,471)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (3,881,428)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (3,881,428)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (3,881,428)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.49)

 
        

                                     

<PAGE>



</TABLE>
| **Warranties - Additional Information (Detail)** | 3 Months Ended |
|--------------------------------------------------|----------------|
||
| **Guarantees [Abstract]**                        |           |
| Product warranty period                          | 1 year         |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Product warranty period.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**ndsn_ProductsWarrantyPeriod**Namespace Prefix:**ndsn_**Data Type:**xbrli:durationItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_GuaranteesAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

SEAN P. REILLY,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 4:20-cv-145-TKW/EMT

MARK S. INCH,

Respondent.

/

O R D E R

This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (R&R) (Doc. 20), Petitioner’s motion requesting an evidentiary 

hearing (Doc. 21), Petitioner’s memorandum of law in support of motion to expand 

the record (Doc. 22),

1

and Petitioner’s objections to the R&R (Doc. 27) The R&R 

recommends dismissal of Petitioner’s habeas petition on jurisdictional grounds 

without reaching the merits, whereas Petitioner’s post-R&R motions seek relief 

related to the merits of the petition.

The Court reviewed the issues raised in the objections de novo pursuant to 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). Based on that review, the Court agrees with the magistrate 

judge’s determination that Petitioner’s habeas petition should be dismissed on 

1

 The record does not contain a separate motion to expand the record, so the memorandum 

will be treated as a motion.

Case 4:20-cv-00145-TKW-EMT Document 28 Filed 03/22/21 Page 1 of 2
2

jurisdictional grounds. That ruling renders Petitioner’s post-R&R motions moot. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. The R&R is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Petitioner’s habeas petition (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

4. Petitioner’s post-R&R motions (Docs. 21, 22) are DENIED as moot.

5. The Clerk shall close the case file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of March, 2021.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:20-cv-00145-TKW-EMT Document 28 Filed 03/22/21 Page 2 of 2
#### § 1784.3 Objective.

The objective of the RAVG Program is to assist the residents of rural or native villages in Alaska to provide for the development and construction of water and wastewater systems to improve the health and sanitation conditions in those villages through removal of dire sanitation conditions.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS

EARPLUG PRODUCTS

LIABILITY LITIGATION

This Document Relates to All Cases

Case No. 3:19-md-2885 (MCR/HTC)

Judge M. Casey Rodgers

Magistrate Judge Hope T. Cannon

MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE

Pursuant to Pretrial Order No. 3, Case Management Order No. 1, and the

Northern District of Florida Local Rule 11.1, I, Patrick R. Dowd, hereby move this

Court for an Order for admission to practice pro hac vice in the above-referenced

matter, and in support thereof state as follows:

1. Movant resides in Missouri and is not a resident of the State of Florida.

2. Movant is admitted to practice and is a member of good standing of the

bar of the State of Missouri (Bar No. 64820). A copy of the Certificate of Good

Standing from the State of Missouri dated within 30 days of this motion is attached

hereto as Exhibit A.

3. Pursuant to Pretrial Order No. 3 and Local Rule 11.1, Movant has

successfully completed both the online Local Rules tutorial exam, confirmation

number FLND1677003360193, and the CM/ECF online tutorial.

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3677 Filed 02/22/23 Page 1 of 4
4. Movant has submitted to the Clerk the required $208.00 pro hac vice

admission fee.

5. Movant has a "Next Gen" PACER account.

6. Once this motion is granted, Movant will file a Notice of Appearance

in the master docket, In re 3M Combat Arms Earplug Products Liability Litigation,

No. 3:19-md-2885.

7. Movant will also file a Notice of Appearance as attorney of record for

Plaintiff John Gibson in the related case Gibson v. 3M Company, et al.; Case No.

3:19-mc-00087.

WHEREFORE, Patrick R. Dowd respectfully requests that this Court enter an

Order granting this motion to appear pro hac vice and directing the clerk to provide 

notice of Electronic Case Filings to the undersigned.

Dated: February 22, 2023 Isl Patrick R. Dowd

Patrick R. Dowd 

MO State Bar No. 64820 

Holland Law Firm

211 North Broadway, Suite 2625

St. Louis, MO 63102

Tel.: (314) 241-8111

pdowd@hollandtriallawyers.com

2

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3677 Filed 02/22/23 Page 2 of 4
Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3677 Filed 02/22/23 Page 3 of 4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on February 21, 2023, I caused a copy of the foregoing

Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice to be filed electronically with the Clerk of the Court

using the CM/ECF system, which will serve all counsel of record.

/s/ Patrick R. Dowd

Patrick R. Dowd

3

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3677 Filed 02/22/23 Page 4 of 4
<PAGE>
                                                               EXHIBIT 10(T)(20)

                    CENTERPOINT ENERGY, INC. RETIREMENT PLAN
               (As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 1999)

                                 Ninth Amendment

          CenterPoint Energy, Inc., a Texas corporation, having reserved the
right under Section 15.1 of the CenterPoint Energy, Inc. Retirement Plan, as
amended and restated effective as of January 1, 1999, and as thereafter amended
(the "Plan"), under Section 15.1 of the Plan, does hereby amend the first
paragraph of Section 14.2 of the Plan, effective as of October 27, 2004, to read
as follows:

     "Each Employer shall contribute to the Plan every year such amount as shall
     be actuarially determined to be sufficient to fund the liability of the
     Plan. The amount of such contribution shall be determined annually by the
     Company, acting through its Chief Financial Officer or such other officer
     of the Company authorized by the Board, following actuarial determination.
     The Company shall, prior to the fixing of the amount of contributions by
     the respective Employers, cause such actuarial determination to be made by
     the Actuary appointed by it but the fixing of the amount of contributions
     by the Employers shall be made by the Company after considering the
     recommendation of such Actuary. In no event shall such annual contributions
     be less than the minimum amount required by the minimum funding standard of
     ERISA. The provisions of this Section 14.2 and Section 13.13 shall be
     deemed to be the procedure for establishing and carrying on the funding
     policy and method of the Plan. All expenses of administering the Plan shall
     be paid by the Employers on a pro rata basis."

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CenterPoint Energy, Inc. has caused these presents
to be executed by its duly authorized officer in a number of copies, all of
which shall constitute one and the same instrument, which may be sufficiently
evidenced by any executed copy hereof, on this 22nd day of November 2004, but
effective as of the date specified herein.

                                      CENTERPOINT ENERGY, INC.


                                      By /s/ David M. McClanahan
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         David M. McClanahan
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer

ATTEST:


/s/ Richard Dauphin
-----------------------------------
Richard Dauphin
Assistant Secretary


                                        1
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-91,338-01

EX PARTE DAVID PATRICK BERTRAM, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NUMBER 1519159-A IN THE 178 DISTRICT COURT

TH

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

This is a post-conviction application for a writ of habeas corpus forwarded to this

Court pursuant to TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3, et seq. Applicant was convicted

of attempt to commit aggravated kidnapping, and punishment was assessed at fifty years’

confinement. The First Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Bertram v. State, No. 01-

17-00940-CR (Tex. App.—Houston[1st] May 30, 2019) (not designated for publication).

The Court received this writ application on June 22, 2020. On Aug. 26, 2020, this

Court denied it. Applicant filed a supplemental application in the trial court on June 23,
2020. We did not receive it until after we entered our order. Therefore, we reconsider the

application. After reconsideration on its own motion, the Court finds that the application

should be denied on the merits. Accordingly, the Court enters an order denying this

application.

Applicant’s writ application is denied.

DO NOT PUBLISH

DELIVERED: January 13, 2021
Exhibit 31.2**Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302**I, Keith R. Schroeder, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Orchids Paper Products Company (the“Registrant”);2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) [reserved](c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: November 3, 2006 /s/ Keith R. Schroeder Keith R. Schroeder    Chief Financial Officer  
28
**EXHIBIT 31.2** **Certification    Pursuant to    Rule 13a-14(a)    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934**     I, Christopher A. Black, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on    Form 10-Q    of American Commercial Lines Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this quarterly report,    fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls    and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosures controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is    being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably    likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal    control over the financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. /s/  Christopher    A. Black    Christopher A. Black
Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

ex rel. ROBERT V SMITH,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 3:20cv3678-MCR-EMT

JAY A ODOM,

OKALOOSA COUNTY BOARD OF 

COUNTY COMMISSIONERS,

Defendants.

_________________________________/

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties’ response to the Court’s inquiry regarding sealing, ECF 

No. 35, the Amended Complaint will remain SEALED for a period of sixty (60) 

days from the date of filing, and the pending Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 24, is 

MOOT. 

DONE AND ORDERED this 23rd day of March 2021.

M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-03678-MCR-EMT Document 36 Filed 03/23/21 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Frederick C. Herbst, certify that:

1.   I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Clayton Holdings, Inc.;

2.   Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

(b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SECtransition instructions contained in SEC Release No. 34-47986];

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

5.   The registrant’sother certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
| Date: November 10, 2006 |                      |
|-------------------------|---------------------------|
|                    |                      |
|                    | /s/ Frederick C. Herbst   |   |
|                    | Frederick C. Herbst       |
|                    | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
(April 8, 1969)

#### The People of the State of New York v. James Abner Geer.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted and the appeal dismissed as being abandoned (iCode iCrim. Pro., § 535). Concur—Stevens, P. J., Capozzoli, MeGivem, Markewich and Nunez, JJ.
#### The State ex rel. Libecap, Appellee, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellants.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Libecap v. Indus. Comm.*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 178.]

(No. 96-2352

Submitted July 8, 1998

Decided September 23, 1998.)

*Hochman & Roach Co., L.P.A.,*and *Gary D. Plunkett,*for appellee.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Steven P. Fixler,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellants.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Moyer, C.J., dissents.

Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting. I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

Cook, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.
#### § 27.92 Method of payment; advance deposit.

Any payment or advance deposit under this subpart shall be by check, draft, or money order, payable to the order of “Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA,” and may not be made in cash except in cases where the total payment or deposit does not exceed $1.