alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
120 STAT. 374 PUBLIC LAW 109–223—MAY 18, 2006

Public Law 109–223

109th Congress

Joint Resolution

To memorialize and honor the contribution of Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist.

Whereas President Richard M. Nixon nominated William H.

Rehnquist to replace Associate Justice John Marshall Harlan

on the Supreme Court on October 21, 1971, he was confirmed

by the United States Senate on December 10, 1971, and served

as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United

States from January 1972 through September 1986;

Whereas President Ronald W. Reagan nominated Associate Justice

William H. Rehnquist to replace Chief Justice Warren E. Burger

as the Sixteenth Chief Justice of the United States on June

20, 1986, and he was confirmed by the United States Senate

on September 17, 1986;

Whereas William Rehnquist presided as Chief Justice from September 1986 until September 2005 for a total of 19 years, making

him the fourth-longest-serving Chief Justice after Melville W.

Fuller, Roger B. Taney, and John Marshall, and the longestserving Chief Justice who had previously served as an Associate

Justice;

Whereas Chief Justice Rehnquist ably presided as chief administrator of the United States courts to insure the due administration

of justice during times of rising caseloads and fiscal constraints;

Whereas Chief Justice Rehnquist was respected for his intellect,

fairness, and humor by his fellow Justices and by members of

the other branches of government; and

Whereas despite the debilitating effects of thyroid cancer, Chief

Justice Rehnquist continued his service to the court and the

country, and administered the oath of office to President George

W. Bush at his second inauguration on January 20, 2005: Now,

therefore, be it

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND HONOR.

The United States, acting through Congress, authorizes and

directs the Curator of the Supreme Court, subject to the direction

and approval of the Chief Justice of the United States, to procure

a marble bust, including pedestal, of the late Chief Justice William

H. Rehnquist, and to cause them to be placed in the Supreme

Court building to honor his memory and legacy to the Supreme

Court of the United States.

Supreme Court.

May 18, 2006

[H.J. Res. 83]

PUBLIC LAW 109–223—MAY 18, 2006 120 STAT. 375

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.J. Res. 83:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):

Apr. 25, considered and passed House.

May 4, considered and passed Senate.

fi

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

There is authorized to be appropriated $50,000 to carry out

this Act.

Approved May 18, 2006.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cascade Technologies Corp.  (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Daniel L. Farkas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: August 15, 2011  /s/ Daniel L. FarkasName:Daniel L. FarkasTitle:Chief Executive Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cascade Technologies Corp.  and will be retained by Cascade Technologies Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.   *This certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION III

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

December 15, 2014

The Honorable Dana Aunkst

Acting Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection

Rachel Carson State Office Building

P.O. Box 2063

Harrisburg, PA 17105-2063

Dear Acting Secretary Aunkst:

On September 9, 2014, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a 

revision to the Pennsylvania State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Pennsylvania Department 

of Environmental Protection. The SIP revision requests redesignation from nonattainment to 

attainment, and approval of the maintenance plan of the Allentown 2006 24-hour PM2.5 area. 

EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete, and is 

reviewing it to prepare Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. 

If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Rose Quinto, Office 

of Air Program Planning, at (215) 814-2182. She is the principal contact for this rulemaking. 

 Sincerely, 

/s/

David L. Arnold, Acting Director

 Air Protection Division 

cc: Joyce E. Epps, Director, PADEP Bureau of Air Quality
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 182 

To require the Secretary of Transportation to modify the final rule relating 

to flightcrew member duty and rest requirements for passenger operations of air carriers to apply to all-cargo operations of air carriers, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2013 

Mr. GRIMM (for himself and Mr. BISHOP of New York) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 

Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Transportation to modify the 

final rule relating to flightcrew member duty and rest 

requirements for passenger operations of air carriers to 

apply to all-cargo operations of air carriers, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safe Skies Act of 

5 2013’’. 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•HR 182 IH

1 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF FINAL RULE RELATING TO 

2 FLIGHTCREW MEMBER DUTY AND REST RE3 QUIREMENTS FOR PASSENGER OPERATIONS 

4 TO APPLY TO ALL-CARGO OPERATIONS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the 

6 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Trans7 portation shall modify the final rule specified in subsection 

8 (b) so that the flightcrew member duty and rest require9 ments under that rule apply to flightcrew members in all10 cargo operations conducted by air carriers in the same 

11 manner as those requirements apply to flightcrew mem12 bers in passenger operations conducted by air carriers. 

13 (b) FINAL RULE SPECIFIED.—The final rule speci14 fied in this subsection is the final rule of the Federal Avia15 tion Administration— 

16 (1) published in the Federal Register on Janu17 ary 4, 2012 (77 Fed. Reg. 330); and 

18 (2) relating to flightcrew member duty and rest 

19 requirements. 

20 (c) APPLICABILITY OF RULEMAKING REQUIRE21 MENTS.—The requirements of section 553 of title 5, 

22 United States Code, shall not apply to the modification 

23 required by subsection (a). 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
-80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲

▲

▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

08/23

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 23 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.54 N 76.62 W Meters AGL
#### § 205.200 General.

The producer or handler of a production or handling operation intending to sell, label, or represent agricultural products as “100 percent organic,” “organic,” or “made with organic (specified ingredients or food group(s))” must comply with the applicable provisions of this subpart. Production practices implemented in accordance with this subpart must maintain or improve the natural resources of the operation, including soil and water quality.
#### §§ 1739.4-1739.7 [Reserved]
Exhibit 10.3


Summary of Executive Compensation

      The current salaries payable to each "named executive officer," as defined
in Item 402 of Regulation S-K, of Franklin Street Properties Corp. (the
"Company") are as follows:


George J. Carter, President and Chief Executive Officer             $225,000

Barbara Fournier, Vice President, Chief
Operating Officer, Treasurer and Secretary                          $175,000

Richard R. Norris, Executive Vice President                         --

R. Scott MacPhee, Executive Vice President                          --

William W. Gribbell, Executive Vice President                       --

      Messrs. Gribbell, MacPhee and Norris are Investment Executives of the
Company, whose compensation consists primarily of commissions earned on the sale
of interests in the Sponsored REITs that are syndicated by the Company. As is
standard practice in the investment industry, Investment Executives earn as
commission a percentage of payout of the gross sales commission earned on each
investment sale. The actual amount of compensation earned as commissions is
determined by the level of sales conducted by each individual.

      Each of the executive officers listed above, other than the Investment
Executives, is eligible for bonuses payable in the form of cash and/or shares of
the common stock of the Company based on the Company's performance and the
individual's performance during the year. Ms. Fournier was awarded a bonus of
$152,000 in cash and $39,673 in shares of the Company's common stock with
respect to the 2004 fiscal year. None of the other executive officers above was
awarded a bonus with respect to the 2004 fiscal year.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 24.3

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

         KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby
constitutes and appoints each of Beverly L. Brown, Robert K. Kretzman, Lawrence
E. Kreider and Joram C. Salig or any of them, each acting alone, his true and
lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution, for him and
his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, in connection with the
THE COSMETIC CENTER, INC. (the "Corporation") Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 27, 1997 (the "Form 10-K") under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including, without limiting the generality of
the foregoing, to sign the Form 10-K in the name and on behalf of the
Corporation or on behalf of the undersigned as a director or officer of the
Corporation, and any amendments to the Form 10-K and any instrument, contract,
document or other writing, of or in connection with the Form 10-K or amendments
thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents
in connection therewith, including this power of attorney, with the Securities
and Exchange Commission and any applicable securities exchange or securities
self-regulatory body, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each
acting alone, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and
thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to
all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying
and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone,
or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue
hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed these presents this 17
day of March, 1998.

                             /s/ DONALD G. DRAPKIN
                             -------------------------------
                             DONALD G. DRAPKIN
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXAS NO. WR-83,014-01

EX P ARTE KENNETH BROUSS ARD, Applicant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 1451074-A IN THE 178 DISTRICT COURT T H F ROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisions of Ar t i cl e 1 1

. 07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of delivery of less t h an one gram of coca ine, and was sentenc ed to eight months in state jail. He did not appea l h i s conviction. Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary and that his conviction violates due proce ss beca use the e vidence in his case wa s tested and found not to c ontain any coca ine, eve n though the lab test shows that the evide nce c ontained methamphe tamine, a diff ere nt controlled substance

.2

The pa rties have enter ed agree d finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, a nd the trial cour

t deter mined that Applicant’s decision to plead guilty in this case was not a voluntary and intelligent choice

. In Mable , this Court h el d t h at a guilty plea to possession of a controlled substance was i n v o l u n t ary when the Applicant did not know that the seized substances contained no illicit materia ls. Ex parte Mable , 443 S.W .3d 129 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). We order that this application be filed and set for submissi on to deter mine whether Applicant’s plea of guilty was involuntary when the s ubstance s seized and tested contained illi cit materia ls other than t hose allege d, but which are within the same penalty g roup under the Hea lth a nd Safety Code. The parties shall brief the issue. It appea rs that Applicant is repr esente d by counsel. I f he is not, the trial court shall deter mine whether he is indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and desires to be repr ese n t ed by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to repr esent them. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art 26.04. The trial court shall send to this Court, within 30 day s of the date of this order , a supplemental transcript containing :

a confirmation that Applicant is repr esente d by counsel; the order appointing counsel; or a statement that Applicant is not indige nt. A ll briefs shall be filed with this Court within 60 day s of the date of this order. Deliver ed: Marc h 9, 2016 Do not publish
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsPerformance Evaluation of 40 cm Ion Optics for the NEXT Ion EngineThe results of performance tests with two 40 cm ion optics sets are presented and compared to those of 30 cm ion optics with similar aperture geometries. The 40 cm ion optics utilized both NSTAR and TAG (Thick-Accelerator-Grid) aperture geometries. All 40 cm ion optics tests were conducted on a NEXT (NASA's Evolutionary Xenon Thruster) laboratory model ion engine. Ion optics performance tests were conducted over a beam current range of 1.20 to 3.52 A and an engine input power range of 1.1 to 6.9 kW. Measured ion optics' performance parameters included near-field radial beam current density profiles, impingement-limited total voltages, electron backstreaming limits, screen grid ion transparencies, beam divergence angles, and start-up transients. Impingement-limited total voltages for 40 cm ion optics with the NSTAR aperture geometry were 60 to 90 V lower than those with the TAG aperture geometry. This difference was speculated to be due to an incomplete burn-in of the TAG ion optics. Electron backstreaming limits for the 40 cm ion optics with the TAG aperture geometry were 8 to 19 V higher than those with the NSTAR aperture geometry due to the thicker accelerator grid of the TAG geometry. Because the NEXT ion engine provided beam flatness parameters that were 40 to 63 percent higher than those of the NSTAR ion engine, the 40 cm ion optics outperformed the 30 cm ion optics.Document ID20020084975Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsSoulas, George C.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Haag, Thomas W.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Patterson, Michael J.*(NASA Glenn Research Center Cleveland, OH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateAugust 1, 2002Subject CategorySpacecraft Propulsion And PowerReport/Patent NumberAIAA Paper 2002-3834E-13496NASA/TM-2002-211801Meeting InformationMeeting: 38th Joint Propulsion Conference and ExhibitLocation: Indianapolis, INCountry: United StatesStart Date: July 7, 2002End Date: July 10, 2002Sponsors:American Society for Electrical Engineers,American Society of Mechanical Engineers,Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc.,American Inst. of Aeronautics and AstronauticsFunding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 755-B4-04Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20020084975.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

ex rel. ROBERT V. SMITH,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:20cv3678/MCR/EMT

JAY A. ODOM; OKALOOSA COUNTY,

BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS,

Defendants.

/

ORDER

This case was filed on February 26, 2020 by Plaintiff-Relator Robert V. Smith

on behalf of the United States of America, pursuant to the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. 

§§ 3729 et seq. The case has been under seal pending a determination by the United 

States Attorney as to whether the United States (“the Government”) would intervene. 

The Government has filed a Notice of Election to Decline Intervention. See ECF No. 

7. Thus, the case is due to be unsealed as instructed below and the Plaintiff permitted 

to proceed. 

Accordingly:

1. The Clerk is directed to unseal the Complaint and the Relator must serve 

it on the Defendants within 21 days of the date of this Order.

2. All other contents of the Court’s file in this action will remain under seal

and not be made public or served on the Defendants, except for this Order, 

Case 3:20-cv-03678-MCR-EMT Document 8 Filed 12/02/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:20cv3678/MCR/EMT

the Government’s Notice of Election to Decline Intervention, ECF No. 7, 

and all documents filed after the date that the Government’s notice, ECF 

No. 7, was filed. 

3. The parties are directed to serve all pleadings and motions filed in this 

action, including supporting memoranda, on the Government, as provided 

for in 31 U.S.C. § 3730(c)(3). The Government may order any deposition 

transcripts and is entitled to intervene in this action for good cause at any 

time. 

4. The parties must serve all notices of appeal on the Government.

5. All orders of this Court must be sent to the Government.

6. Should the Relator or Defendants propose that this action be dismissed, 

settled, or otherwise discontinued, the Court will solicit the Government’s 

written consent before ruling or granting approval. See 31 U.S.C. 

§ 3730(b)(1).

DONE AND ORDERED, on this 2nd day of December, 2020.

M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-03678-MCR-EMT Document 8 Filed 12/02/20 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG

PRODUCTS LIABILITY 

LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

Shanika Roper v. 3M Co. et al.

Case No.: 7:20cv02945

Case No. 3:19-md-2885-MCR-GRJ

Judge M. Casey Rodgers

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones

JOINT SUBMISSION REGARDING THE PARTIES’ VENUE AND 

CHOICE OF LAW AGREEMENTS 

Pursuant to Case Management Orders 31 and 45, the parties submit the 

following Joint Submission Regarding Parties’ Venue and Choice of Law 

Agreements.

1. Plaintiff and Defendants have agreed to the following Venue: USDC 

Northern District of Georgia

2. Plaintiff and Defendants have agreed to the following state law for 

choice-of-law analysis: Alabama

s/ Kari L. Sutherland 

Kari L. Sutherland 

BUTLER SNOW LLP 

1200 Jefferson Ave., Suite 205 

Oxford, MS 38655 

Telephone: (662) 513-8000 

Kari.sutherland@butlersnow.com

By: /s/ Joshua H. Bauer

Dennis C. Reich

Texas State Bar No. 16739600

Joshua H. Bauer 

Texas State Bar No. 24084380

REICH & BINSTOCK, L.L.P.

4265 San Felipe, Suite 1000

Houston, Texas 77027
Susan M. Robinson 

THOMAS COMBS & SPANN, 

PLLC 

300 Summers Street, Suite 1380 

Charleston, WV 25301 

Telephone: (304) 414-1808 

srobinson@tcspllc.com

Kimberly Branscome 

DECHERT LLP 

633 W. 5th St., Suite 4900 

Los Angeles, CA 90071 

Telephone: (213) 808-5762 

kimberly.branscome@dechert.com

Robert C. “Mike” Brock 

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 

1301 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20004 

Telephone: (202) 389-5991 

mike.brock@kirkland.com

Mark J. Nomellini 

KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 

300 North LaSalle 

Chicago, Illinois 60654 

Telephone: (312) 862-3254 

mark.nomellini@kirkland.com

Counsel for Defendants 3M 

Company, 3M 

Occupational Safety LLC, Aearo 

Technologies LLC, Aearo Holding, 

LLC, 

Aearo Intermediate, LLC and Aearo, 

LLC

Tel: (713) 622-7271

Fax: (713) 623-8724

dreich@reichandbinstock.com

jbauer@reichandbinstock.com

Counsel for Defense Counsel for Plaintiff
Figure 6. Labor force participation rates of women by age, 1950-1990 Age                = 16-19:
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN

NO. 03-0 8 -00 272 -CR

Chr ist ina M ar ie P e r r y , A ppe lla nt

v . The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF MI LAM COUNTY , 20TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. CR2095 8 , HO NORAB LE ED MAGRE , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N
I n J uly 2004, appellant Christina Mar ie Perry pleade d g uilty

to burg l ary

of a habit at i o n , was a djudge d g uilty , and sente nced to ten year s in prison. See Tex. P enal Code A nn. § 30.02 (West 2003)
. Pursuant to a plea barg ain, the district c ourt suspended imposition of sentence and plac ed appe llant on community supervision. She now appe als fr o m the cour t’s April 2008 order revokingsupervision and imposing se ntence . Appellant’s c ourt-appointed attorney has filed a

motion to wit hdrawand a supporting brief concluding that the appea l is frivolous and without mer it. The brief meets the require ments of An de rs v . Ca lif

or nia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by prese nting a

profe ssional evalua t i o n o f t he re cord demonstrating why there are no arguable gr ounds to be advance d. Se e als o Pe ns on v . O hio , 4 88 U. S. 75 (1 98 8) ; Hi

gh v . S tate , 573 S.W. 2d 80 7 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 78 ); Cur riev . S tate , 516 S.W .2d 684 (T e x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 74 ); Jacks on v . S tate , 4 85 S.W. 2d

55 3 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 72 ); Gainous2

v . S tate , 436 S.W .2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Appellant rece ived a copy of counsel’s brief a nd was advised of her rig ht to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. N o pro se br ief has bee n filed. We h a

v e re viewed the rec ord and c ounsel’s brief and ag ree that the appe al is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the rec ord that might ar g uably support the appe al. Counsel’s motion to wit hdrawis gr anted.

The orde r re voking c ommunity supervision is affir

med.

__________________________________________ W. Kenneth L aw, Chief Justice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Pury ear and Pember

ton Affir med Filed: Oc tober 16, 2008 Do No t Pu

bli sh