alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of CEO Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of KapStone Paper andPackaging Corporation for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Roger W. Stone,Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of KapStone Paper and PackagingCorporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                 The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2)                                 The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation.

 

Dated: July 30, 2009

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Roger W. Stone                    |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   |   | Roger W. Stone                        |
|   |   | Chairman and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
<PAGE>
                                                               EXHIBIT 10.7
              AMENDMENT TO PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT
                MCMORAN 1997 EXPLORATION PROGRAM


     This Amending Agreement (the "Amending Agreement") is made as of the
15th day of December, 1997 between McMoRan Oil & Gas Co., ("McMoRan") and
Freeport-McMoRan Resource Partners, Limited Partnership ("Participant").

     WITNESSETH:

     WHEREAS, McMoRan and Participant entered into the Participation
Agreement for the McMoRan 1997 Exploration Program as of April 1, 1997;

     WHEREAS, McMoRan and Participant agree to expand the Program in
certain respects to include additional participants (the "Expanded
Program") effective as of December 15, 1997.

     NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises and the
respective covenants and agreements contained herein and for good and
valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the
parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:

                               I.
The Grand Isle 65 Prospect, the Eugene Island 18/19 Prospect, the West
Cameron 616 Prospect and the West Cameron 492 Prospect shall not be
included in the Expanded Program and the interest of McMoRan and the
Participant in such Prospects shall be as set forth in the Program
Agreement, unaffected by this Amending Agreement.

                              II.
To the extent that other participants have reimbursed McMoRan for a portion
of the Initial Leasehold Inventory, McMoRan will credit Participant with
its proportionate share of such reimbursement.
<PAGE>
                              III.
Section 6.1 of the Program Agreement is amended to provide that the budget
for the Program as to those properties that are not included in the
Expanded Program shall be $45,000,000, with the $155,000,000 balance of the
original Program budget plus the approximate $10,000,000 commitment of the
new participant to be the total budget of the Expanded Program.

                              IV.
The parties hereby adopt the Participation Agreement attached hereto as
Exhibit A as the Program Agreement for the Expanded Program effective as of
December 15, 1997.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement is executed in multiple copies,
each of which shall be deemed to be an original on December 19, 1997, but
effective as of the date first above written.

                                   McMoRan Oil & Gas Co.

                                   By:  /s/ GLENN A. KLEINERT
                                        Glenn A. Kleinert
                                        Senior Vice President


                                   Freeport-McMoRan Resource Partners,
                                       Limited Partnership
                                   By:  Freeport-McMoRan Inc. as
                                        Administrative Managing Partner


                                   By:  /s/ ROBERT M. WOHLEBER
                                        Robert M. Wohleber
                                        Senior Vice President
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2014-0289 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2013-NM-146-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 13-AD-41

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
#### OVINGTON BROS. CO., Appellant, v. HENSHAW, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 5, 1906.)

Action by the Ovington Bros. Company against Cornelia M. Henshaw, individually, and as executrix, etc., of Sarah Grace, deceased.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the opinion of GAYNOR, J., at special term. 93 N. Y. Supp. 380.

JENKS and HOOKER, JJ., dissent.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>  0001014669
<NAME>  STERLING CHEMICALS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           5,740
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  165,302
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,186)
<INVENTORY>                                     83,726
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               262,079
<PP&E>                                         803,247
<DEPRECIATION>                                 484,621
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 677,143
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          177,492
<BONDS>                                        791,684
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (377,790)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   677,143
<SALES>                                      1,078,351
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,078,351
<CGS>                                          937,460
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  937,460
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               100,455
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              99,723
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (59,287)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,560
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (63,847)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (63,847)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### § 29.3106 Rule 3.

In drawing an official sample from a hogshead or other package of tobacco, three or more breaks shall be made at such points and in such manner as the inspector or sampler may find necessary to determine the kinds of tobacco and the percentage of each kind contained in the lot. One break shall be made not more than six inches from the top of the package and one not more than six inches from the bottom. All breaks shall be made so that the tobacco contained in the center of the package is visible to the sampler. Tobacco shall be drawn from at least three breaks from which a representative sample shall be selected. The sample shall include tobacco of each different group, quality, color, length, and kind found in the lot in proportion to the quantities of each contained in the lot.

[24 FR 8771, Oct. 29, 1959, as amended at 49 FR 16758, Apr. 20, 1984]
#### Arnold Brown, Respondent, v American Council of Life Insurance, Appellant.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on June 29, 1979, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Kassal, J., at Special Term, without costs and without disbursements. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Sandler, Sullivan, Bloom and Markewich, JJ.
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between S. Dick Decicco, Doing Business as Westchester Amusement Company, Appellant, and Frank Viviano, Doing Business as Dunwoodie Golf Course Restaurant, Respondent.

In a proceeding to vacate an arbitration award, petitioner appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated April 15, 1968, which denied the application and confirmed the award; and (2) a judgment of the same court, entered July 11, 1968, on said award. Order and judgment affirmed, with one bill of $20 costs and disbursements. We find no merit in petitioner’s argument that the arbitrator exceeded his power and failed to follow the procedure of CPLR article 75, within the meaning of CPLR 7511 (subd. [b], par. 1, els. [iii], [iv]), by receiving in evidence testimony concerning alleged changes and modifications in the contract between the parties, after respondent’s motion to stay arbitration had been denied by the court. Petitioner’s claim in the arbitration proceeding was for damages for breach of contract; the nature of that contract was a proper question for consideration by the arbitrator; and his award in respondent’s favor may not be set aside for mere errors of judgment, either as to the law or the facts (cf. *Matter of Wilkins,*169 N. Y. 494, 496-497; *Matter of National Cash Register Co. [Wilson],*8 N Y 2d 377, 383; *Matter of Exercycle Corp. [Maratta],*9 N Y 2d 329, 334, 336; *Korein*v. *Rabin,*29 A D 2d 351). Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**Certification
      of Principal Financial Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SRKP 2, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony C.
      Pintsopoulos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Anthony C. PintsopoulosAnthony
                C. PintsopoulosPrincipal
                Financial OfficerJuly
                30, 2008
C. A. No. 79-151.

#### Bradford Hoyle *v.*State.

Mr. Justice Weisberger did not participate.

*Rradford Hoyle,*pro se, for plaintiff. *Dennis J. Roberts II,*Attorney General, *Stephen Lichatin III,*Special Assistant Attorney General, for defendant;

The state’s motion to dismiss this appeal is denied. Appellant Hoyle’s application for post-conviction relief was not heard in Superior Court due to the pendency of his direct appeal in this court. Hoyle’s direct appeal has now been decided. *State*v. *Hoyle,*122 R.I. 45, 404 A.2d 69 (1979).

Accordingly, this case is remanded to the Superior Court for further proceedings on appellant’s application for post-conviction relief.
#### The State ex rel. Walsh, Appellant, *v.*R.G. Smith Company et al., Appellees.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Walsh v. R.G. Smith Co.*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 145.]

(No. 96-2652

Submitted July 8, 1998

Decided September 16, 1998.)

*Zwick Law Offices Co., L.P.A.,*and *James P. Proctor,*for appellant.

*Krugliak, Wilkins, Griffiths & Dougherty Co., L.P.A., David E. Butz*and *Edward D. Murray,*for appellee R.G. Smith Co.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Cecille Caluya Harris,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:98CR47/LAC 

 

ANDRE MOSES

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Senior Judge Collier on August 14, 2007

Type of Motion/Pleading: MOTION TO CLARIFY JUDGEMENT OF CONVICTION,

MOTION TO CLARIFY ORDER OF COMMITMENT, & MOTION TO VACATE OR MODIFY

SENTENCE 

Filed by: DEFENDANT on 6/13/07 Document 189

( ) Stipulated/Consented/Joint Pleading

RESPONSES:

on Doc.#

on Doc.#

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Mary Maloy

Deputy Clerk: MARY MALOY

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 16th day of

August, 2007, that:

(a) The requested relief is DENIED without prejudice.

(b) The defendant’s motion appears to be, at least in part, an

attempt to bring a second or successive motion to vacate pursuant

to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, and defendant has not obtained leave to file

such a motion from the Eleventh Circuit. Defendant’s attempt to

suggest alternate jurisdictional bases for challenging his

sentence are without merit. 

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 3:98-cr-00047-LC Document 191 Filed 08/16/07 Page 1 of 1
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 223 (Friday, November 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70951-70952]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29187]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION

Proposal Review Panel for Physics; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting.

    Name: LIGO Laboratory Annual Review at Hanford Observatory for 
Physics (1208).
    Date and Time: Tuesday, December 7, 2010: 8:15 a.m.-5 p.m.
    Wednesday, December 8, 2010: 8:15 a.m.-5 p.m.
    Thursday, December 9, 2010: 8:30 a.m.-11:30 a.m.
    Place: LIGO site at Hanford, Washington.
    Type of Meeting: Partially Closed.
    Contact Person: Thomas Carruthers, Program Director, Division of 
Physics, National Science Foundation, (703) 292-7373.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide an evaluation of the project 
construction for implementation of the AdvLIGO project to the 
National Science Foundation.

Agenda

Tuesday, December 7, 2010

8:15 a.m.-8:30 a.m. Open--Sign in
8:45 a.m.-9:15 a.m. Closed--Executive Session
9:15 a.m.-11:45 a.m. Open--Welcome, LIGO status, Reporting Metrics
12:45 p.m.-2:45 p.m. Open--S6 Science run, performance, risk 
reduction

[[Page 70952]]

3:15 p.m.-4:30 p.m. Data Management, LIGO Australia, LSC status
5 p.m. Closed--Executive Session

Wednesday, December 8, 2010

8:15 a.m.-8:30 a.m. Open--Sign in
9:45 a.m.-9:15 a.m. Closed--Executive Session
10:00 a.m.-10:30 a.m. Open--Meeting with LIGO Oversight Committee
10:45 a.m.-11:45 a.m. Open--EPO, diversity, Review of AdvLIGO MREFC
12:45 p.m.-4:15 p.m. Open--Project discussions, tour, Q&A 
discussions
5 p.m. Closed--Executive Session

Thursday, December 9, 2010

8:30 a.m.-8:45 a.m. Open--Sign in
9 a.m.-10:45 a.m. Closed--Executive Session report writing
11:30 a.m. Adjourn
    Reason for Closing: The proposal contains proprietary or 
confidential material, including technical information on personnel. 
These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2)(4) and (6) of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

     Dated: November 16, 2010.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-29187 Filed 11-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
```
**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED **

**PURSUANT        TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1. | the                  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                  March 29, 2007 | /s/                  Ronald A. Brenneman               |
|---------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                                  | Ronald                  A. Brenneman                   |
|                                  | President                  and Chief Executive Officer |

----
<PAGE>   1






                                   Exhibit 23








                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of KLLM Transport Services, Inc. of our report dated February 7, 1999, included
in the 1998 Annual Report to Shareholders of KLLM Transport Services, Inc.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of KLLM Transport
Services, Inc. listed in Item 14(a)(2). This schedule is the responsibility of
the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on
our audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above,
when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly, in all material respects, the information as set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Post-effective Amendment No. 6, Form S-8, No. 33-14545) pertaining to the KLLM
Transport Services, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the Registration
Statement (Form S-8, No. 333-35365) pertaining to the KLLM Transport Services,
Inc. 1996 Stock Purchase Plan and the Registration Statement (Form S-8,
No.333-50359) pertaining to the KLLM Transport Services, Inc. 1998 Non-Employee
Director Stock Compensation Plan of our report dated February 7, 1999, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements incorporated herein by
reference and our report included in the preceding paragraph with respect to the
financial statement schedule of KLLM Transport Services, Inc. included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) of KLLM Transport Services, Inc.




                                       Ernst & Young LLP
Jackson, Mississippi
March 29, 1999
**EXHIBIT      32(b)**

| 1) |   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2) |   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                 |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|  /s/              David C. Stuebe                               |   |
|                  David C. Stuebe                                |   |   |
| Vice                President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer |   |   |
| (Principal                Financial Officer)                         |   |   |
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Superior Well Services, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David E. Wallace, Chief Executive Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of thisSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.         By:                                                /s/ David E. Wallace    David E. Wallace         Chief Executive Officer and Chairman