T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T S YA HR I J AY A H AS UR UN GA N, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 11- 73633 A ge nc yN o. A 098- 270- 035 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d June 10, 2013 ** B efo re: H A W K IN S , M cK E O W N , an dB E R Z O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. S y ahr i J ay aH a s urungan, ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of I ndone s i a , pe t i t i ons f

or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng hi s app ea l f r om an i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s de c i s i on de ny i ng hi s appl i c a t i on f ora s y l um and 

# FI LED JU N 12 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 73633 2 w i thh ol di ng of re m ov al . W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew f ors ubs t ant i a l e vi de nc e the a ge nc y ’ s f a c tua l f i ndi ngs and w e r e vi e w de novo the a g e n c y ’s le g a l d e te rm in a tio n s . W akkaryv. H

older , 55 8 F . 3d 10 49 , 10 56 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 9 ) . We d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T he re cord do es no tcom pel the concl usi on thatH as urun gan est abl i shed c h an g e dc ir c u m s tan c e s in I n d o n e s iato e x c u s e h is u n tim e lya s y lu m ap p lic a tio n . See 8 C. F. R. § 1 2 0 8 . 4 ( a ) ( 4 ) . Th u s , w e d e n yth e p e t i t i o n a s t o h i s a s y l u m c l a i m. S ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e s up p o rts th e B I A ’s f in d in g th a t th e 1 9 9 3 in c id e n t d id n o t r is e to th e le v e l o f

p e r s e c u tio n . See W

a kka ry , 5 5 8 F .3 da t 1 0 5 9 ( “P e r s e c u tio n is an e x tr e m e c o n c e p t th a t d o e s n o t in c lu d e e v e rys o rt o f tr e a tm e n t o u rs o c ie ty r e g ar d s a s o f

f e n s iv e .” ) ( in te rn a l q u o ta tio n m ark s an dc ita tio n o m itte d ) ; H oxha v. A s h c r o ft , 319 F . 3d 1179, 1182 ( 9th C i r . 2003) ( har a s s m e nt , thr e a t s , and one beat i ng di d n otcom pel fi nd i ng of pastpers ec ut i on ). In addi t i on , subst ant i al e vi de nc e s upport s the B I A ’ s de t e rm i na t i on tha t , e ve n unde radi s f a vor e d gr oup an a ly s is , H a s u ru n g an f

a ile dto e s tab lis h as u f

f ic ie n t in d iv idu a liz e dr is ko f h arm to s h o w it is m o r e lik e lyth an n o t th a t h e w ill b e p e r s e c u te din I n d o n e s ia . Se e H a lim v. H older , 5 9 0 F .3 d9 7 1 , 9 7 9 - 8 0 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) ; W a kka ry , 5 5 8 F .3 dat 1 0 6 6 (“[a ]n appl i cantfor w i thh ol di ng of re m ov alw i l l need t o add uce aconsi derabl y l ar ger11- 73633 3 quantum of

i ndi vi dua l i z e d- r i s k e vi de nc e t o pr e va i l than w oul d an a s y l um ap p l i can t ”). T h u s, h i s w i th h o l d i n g o f rem o v al cl ai m fai l s. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.