alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 247.8 Individuals applying to participate in CSFP. ( a ) *What information must individuals applying to participate in CSFP provide?* To apply for or to be recertified for CSFP benefits, the applicant or caretaker of the applicant must provide the following information on the application: ( 1 ) Name and address, including some form of identification for each applicant;
( 2 ) Household income;
( 3 ) Household size; and
( 4 ) Other information related to eligibility, such as age
( b ) *What else is required on the application form?* The application form must include a nondiscrimination statement that informs the applicant that program standards are applied without discrimination by race, color, national origin, age, sex, or disability. After informing the applicant or caretaker of the applicant of his or her rights and responsibilities, in accordance with § 247.12, the local agency must ensure that the applicant or caretaker signs the application form beneath the following pre-printed statement. The statement must be read by, or to, the applicant or caretaker before signing.
“This application is being completed in connection with the receipt of Federal assistance. Program officials may verify information on this form. I am aware that deliberate misrepresentation may subject me to prosecution under applicable State and Federal statutes. I am also aware that I may not receive CSFP benefits at more than one CSFP site at the same time. Furthermore, I am aware that the information provided may be shared with other organizations to detect and prevent dual participation. I have been advised of my rights and obligations under the program. I certify that the information I have provided for my eligibility determination is correct to the best of my knowledge. I authorize the release of information provided on this application form to other organizations administering assistance programs for use in determining my eligibility for participation in other public assistance programs and for program outreach purposes. (Please indicate decision by placing a checkmark in the appropriate box.) YES [ ] NO [ ]”
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0584-0293) [70 FR 47063, Aug. 11, 2005, as amended at 79 FR 38750, July 9, 2014; 85 FR 68721, Oct. 30, 2020]
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 16, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70018-70019]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28837]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1942-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2010-0002]


North Carolina; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of North Carolina (FEMA-1942-DR), dated October 14, 2010, 
and related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: November 1, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of North Carolina is hereby amended to include the 
following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely 
affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of October 14, 2010.

    Camden, Martin, New Hanover and Washington Counties for 
Individual Assistance.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used

[[Page 70019]]

for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 
97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster 
Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 
97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing 
Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared 
Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and 
Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to 
Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--
Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, 
Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2010-28837 Filed 11-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
#### § 1221.11 Handle.

*Handle* means to engage in the receiving or acquiring of sorghum and in the shipment (except as a common or contract carrier of sorghum owned by another) or sale of sorghum, or other activity causing sorghum to enter the current of commerce.
#### § 15a.210 Military and merchant marine educational institutions.

This part does not apply to an educational institution whose primary purpose is the training of individuals for a military service of the United States or for the merchant marine.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

May 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133417 & (21) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

TIMOTHY B. BURTON,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 133417 

 COA: 272417 

WCAC: 05-000093 

BEST BUY COMPANY, INC., and PACIFIC 

EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for miscellaneous relief is DENIED. The 

application for leave to appeal the February 12, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is 

considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented 

should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0521 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 30, 2007 

 Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 222 (Thursday, November 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 70741]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29047]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

 [Docket No. ER11-1936-000]


TPF Generation Holdings, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

November 9, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding 
TPF Generation Holdings, LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is November 29, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ce888b9c8d81a0a2a7a0ab9dbbbebea1bcba8ea8abbcade0a9a1b8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f8bebdaabbb7969491969dab8d8888978a8cb89e9d8a9bd69f978e">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-29047 Filed 11-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                           PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Blue Dolphin Energy Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report"),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
Gregory W. Starks, Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Gregory W. Starks
-------------------------------------
Gregory W. Starks
Treasurer (Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)

March 30, 2006


                                       68
#### Hodges *vs.*Holeman.

Covenant,

„T ,,. Upon an obitgation containing a stipulation, that the obligee shall do fore6 heCt shall enforce payment, no suit can be maintained, until the the obligee’ has given notice of <>n his part, to the must be direct inform^itknfde! rived by the ob-not^authorized or requested by givettf uTno/a sufficient notice arcase!"'cannot be ^ recovered or to the notice!

[Mr. Dana and Mr. Owsley for Plaintiff: Mr. Crittenden and Messrs, Morehead and Brown for Defendant.]

From the Circuit Court for Franrxin County.

*November*6.

Chief Justice Robertson

delivered the Opinion of the Court..

As, *bv the terms of the*contract, the note, o» which this suit is brought, was not to payable man should remove all incumbrances on his share of • the Commentator office, not only the removal of all such'incumbrances, but notice, by *Holeman to Hodges,*of that fact was indispensable to the right to maintain a ..__, ' suit on note.

A deed of trust to *Blanton and*Major, for the benefit of the Bank of Kentucky, does not appear to have been effectually released until the year 1831 ; and no sufiicient notice to Hodges of any release has been proved.. on]y notice which was proved, was that given by Swigert, of a release by *the Bank,*in 1829. But, not onb *s re^ea5e insufficient, but Swigert being a stranger to the contract between these parties, and not appearing to-have- acted as Holeman’s agent, or at his request, nothing which he said to Hodges, could be deemed such a notice as he had a right to require,

But nevertheless, judgment was rendered against Hodges, for the principal sum and the legal interest from the year 1829; which was, of course, erroneous,

Wherefore, the judgment must be reversed,, and the cause remanded for a new trial.
§ 201.56-1 Goosefoot family, Chenopodiaceae, and Carpetweed family, Aizoaceae. Kinds of seed: Beet, Swiss chard, fourwing saltbush, spinach, New Zealand spinach, and forage kochia. ( a ) General description. ( 1 ) Germination habit: Epigeal dicot.
( 2 ) Food reserves: Leaf-like cotyledons and perisperm.
( 3 ) Shoot system: The hypocotyl elongates carrying the cotyledons above the soil surface. The epicotyl usually does not show any development within the test period.
( 4 ) Root system: A primary root; secondary roots may develop within the test period.
( 5 ) Seedling: Frequent counts should be made on multigerm beet since the growing seedlings will separate from the cluster making it difficult to identify the source. Any cluster which produces at least one normal seedling is classified as normal; only one normal seedling per cluster is to be counted (see § 201.56(d)). Toxic substances from the clusters of beet and Swiss chard may cause discoloring of the hypocotyl and/or root. Seedlings which are slightly discolored are to be classified as normal; however, if there is excessive discoloration, retest by the method in § 201.58(b)(3).
( b ) Abnormal seedling description. ( 1 ) Cotyledons: ( i ) Less than half of the original cotyledon tissue remaining attached.
( ii ) Less than half of the original cotyledon tissue free of necrosis or decay.
( 2 ) Epicotyl: ( i ) Missing. (May be assumed to be present if cotyledons are intact.)
( ii ) [Reserved]
( 3 ) Hypocotyl: ( i ) Deep open cracks extending into the conducting tissue.
( ii ) Malformed, such as markedly shortened, curled, or thickened.
( iii ) Watery.
( 4 ) Root: ( i ) None.
( ii ) Weak, stubby, or missing primary root with weak secondary or adventitious roots.
( iii ) For discolored roots of beet and Swiss chard, see § 201.58(b)(3).
( 5 ) Seedling: ( i ) One or more essential structures impaired as a result of decay from primary infection. (For discolored seedlings of beet and Swiss chard, see § 201.58(b)(3).)
( ii ) Albino.
[59 FR 64500, Dec. 14, 1994]
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

________________

NO. 09

- 22

- 000 71

- CR



### ________________

DAVID SHANE ACOSTA , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 411 th District Court

Polk County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 27427

________________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In an open plea , A ppellant David Shane Acosta pleaded guilty to the first

degree felony offense of aggravated robbery

. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 29.03.

After a sentencing hearing, the trial court sentenced Acosta to fifteen years of

incarceration

.

Acosta’s appellate counsel filed an Anders brief that presents counsel ’ s

professional evaluation of the record and concludes that the appeal is

frivolous. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State , 573 S.W.2d2 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). On May 23, 2022 , we granted an extension of time for

Acosta to file a pro se brief. We received no response from Acosta

.

We reviewed the appellate record, and we agree with counsel ’ s conclusion

that no arguable issues support th e appeal. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order

appointment of new counsel to re

- brief the appeal. Cf. Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d

503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court ’ s judgment

. 1

AFFIRMED

.

________________________________ W. SCOTT GOLEMON

Chief Justice

Submitted on August 29, 2022

Opinion Delivered September 21, 2022

Do Not Publish

Before Golemon, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.

1 Acosta may challenge our opinion in this case by filing a petition for

discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.1.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCTS

Case No. 3:19md2885

LIABILITY LITIGATION

This Document Relates to: 

Adkins, 7:20cv012

Judge M. Casey Rodgers

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones

DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS ORDER NO. 4

This Order addresses Plaintiff’s objections and counter-designations to 

Defendants’ affirmative deposition designations and Defendants’ objections to 

Plaintiff’s counter-designations thereto for the following witness depositions:

1. Brian Hobbs (7/16/2020)

2. Kathy Gates (5/29/2020)

SO ORDERED this 24th day of September, 2021.

M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 7:20-cv-00012-MCR-GRJ Document 101 Filed 09/24/21 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 224 (Monday, November 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 71130]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29268]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than December 16, 2010.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (A. Linwood Gill, III, Vice 
President) 701 East Byrd Street, Richmond, Virginia 23261-4528:
    1. FA Capital, LLC, and Community Bank Investors of America, L.P., 
both of Richmond, Virginia; to retain 9.86 percent of the voting shares 
of ICB Financial, and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of Inland 
Community Bank, N.A., both of Ontario, California.


    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 16, 
2010.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-29268 Filed 11-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### § 170.3 What products may be sold at the USDA Farmers Market?

Products that may be sold at the market include, but are not limited to, fresh, high-quality fruits, vegetables, herbs, honey, jams and jellies, cheese, vinegars, cider, maple syrup, fish, flowers, bedding plants, and potted plants. USDA inspected meats and poultry items also may be sold.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements and amendments thereto:

     Form S-8 No. 333-39497   401(k) Profit Sharing Plan
     Form S-8 No. 033-62881   1995 Incentive and Nonqualified Stock Option Plan
                              for Key Personnel and Directors
     Form S-8 No. 033-62883   1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
     Form S-8 No. 333-40775   Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan for
                              Executives
     Form S-8 No. 033-21995   1986 and 1987 Stock Option Plans
     Form S-8 No. 033-29317   1986, 1987, 1988 Stock Option Plans-Outside
                              Directors Stock Option Plans
     Form S-8 No. 033-62867   1989 Stock Option Plan
     Form S-8 No. 033-62865   1991 Stock Option Plan
     Form S-8 No. 033-62877   1992 Stock Option Plan
     Form S-8 No. 033-62879   1995 Incentive and Nonqualified Stock Option Plan
                              for Key Personnel and Directors
     Form S-8 No. 333-18477   1996 Compensation Plan for Kantor and Robbins
     Form S-3 No. 333-21927   14,143,109 shares of common stock
     Form S-3 No. 333-03643   6,478,367 shares of common stock and 650,000
                              Series B Warrants

of PharMerica, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses of our report dated April
18, 1997, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of PharMerica, Inc. as
of December 31, 1996, and the related consolidated statements of stockholders'
equity, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December
31, 1996 included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December
31, 1997.


                                       Ernst & Young LLP


Little Rock, Arkansas
March 25, 1998
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2105 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2105

To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 to 
  extend the pilot program for the temporary exchange of information 
                         technology personnel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 22, 2013

 Mr. Kilmer (for himself and Mr. Bridenstine) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 to 
  extend the pilot program for the temporary exchange of information 
                         technology personnel.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Information Technology Exchange 
Program Act of 2013'' or the ``ITEP Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF EXCHANGE PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Section 1110(d) of the National Defense 
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (5 U.S.C. 3702 note) is amended 
by striking ``2013'' and inserting ``2023''.
    (b) Reporting Requirement.--Section 1110(i) of such Act is amended 
by striking ``2015,'' and inserting ``2024,''.
                                 <all>
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 1944

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1944 appear at 80 FR 9885, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1944.536 Grant closing.

Closing is the process by which Rural Development determines that applicable administrative actions have been completed and the Grant Agreement is signed. The Grant Agreement (Exhibit A) will be executed by the State Director at the time the Form RD 1940-1 and Grant Agreement is sent to the Grantee in accordance with § 1944.533 (f)(4). An executed original of the Grant Agreement shall be sent to the District Director and one copy to the grantee.

[44 FR 36891, June 22, 1979, as amended at 55 FR 13504, Apr. 11, 1990]