alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fifth Amendment to Employment Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.1 
  
 FIFTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
  
 THIS FIFTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, dated as of March 10, 2005, is by and between InteliData Technologies Corporation, a
Delaware corporation and Alfred S. Dominick, Jr. (“Executive”) and amends the Employment Agreement dated April 5, 1999, and previously amended on April 5, 2002, January 14, 2003, April 2, 2003, and January 5, 2004 between InteliData and
the Executive as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Section 2 of the Employment Agreement shall be replaced in its entirety by the following: 

  
 “2. Term. The period of employment shall be from April 5, 1999 through April 5, 2006, unless sooner terminated
as herein set forth.” 
  

	 	2.	Section 4 (h) of the Employment Agreement shall be replaced in its entirety by the following: 

  
 “(h) Life Insurance. In addition to the life insurance plan generally made available to InteliData employees,
InteliData shall reimburse Executive for premiums paid with respect to up to $2 million in term life insurance coverage on the life of Executive, or equivalently priced premiums for whole life insurance coverage, (which policies shall be owned by
Executive). Amounts so reimbursed shall be additional compensation to Executive and shall be subject to applicable federal, state and local taxes and withholding.” 
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this FIFTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT as of the tenth day of March, 2005.

  

			
	InteliData Technologies Corporation
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Patrick F. Graham


	 	 	Patrick F. Graham
	 	 	Chairman, Compensation Committee of
	 	 	the Board of Directors
		
	 	 	 /s/ Alfred S. Dominick, Jr.


	 	 	Alfred S. Dominick, Jr.
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-5604, 33-28593 and 33-55693) of National
Sanitary Supply Company of our report dated February 4, 1997 appearing on page 9
of the l996 Annual Report to Stockholders which is incorporated in this Annual
Report on Form 10- K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our
report on the Financial Statement Schedule, which appears on page S-2 of this
Form 10-K.

/S/ PRICE WATERHOUSE LPP
------------------------
PRICE WATERHOUSE LPP

Cincinnati, Ohio
March 4, 1997
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

RANDY A. NELSON

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee.

No. 4D2023

- 1862

[ June 27, 2024 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Howard K. Coates, Jr.

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 501997CF011019A

.

W. Charles Fletcher, Jacksonville, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

K LINGENSMITH

, C.J., M AY and D AMOORGIAN

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### § 1901.504 Authorities and responsibilities.

The Administrator will approve all methods of Rural Development financing and major changes in existing methods. The Director, Finance Office, is responsible for servicing of all certificates of beneficial ownership and insured notes issued by the Finance Office, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York for the servicing of insurance contracts, and the Federal Reserve banks for certificates of beneficial ownership for which the Reserve banks are Rural Development's fiscal agents.

[41 FR 51799, Nov. 24, 1976, as amended at 80 FR 9868, Feb. 24, 2015]
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed April 13, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-831

Lower Tribunal No. F10-19926

________________

Eric Laverne McDade,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Marisa 

Tinkler Mendez, Judge.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Susan S. Lerner, Assistant 

Public Defender, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Magaly Rodriguez, Assistant 

Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, MILLER and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Affirmed. See Forbes v. State, 269 So. 3d 677, 679 (Fla. 3d DCA 

2019) (“Following an evidentiary hearing, we review the denial of a motion 

for postconviction relief to determine whether competent, substantial 

evidence supports the postconviction court's findings of fact”) (citing Mosley 

v. State, 209 So. 3d 1248, 1262 (Fla. 2016)); Floyd v. State, 299 So. 3d 594, 

596 (Fla. 2d DCA 2020) (“On review of an order denying a postconviction 

motion following an evidentiary hearing, we defer to the postconviction 

court's credibility determinations and findings of fact that are supported by 

competent substantial evidence.”)
Plant Name StateORISID Boiler IDSO2Allocation2016 (tons)NOx AnnualAllocation2016 (tons)Platte Nebraska 59 1 2,220 847Gerald Whelan Energy Center Nebraska 60 1 1,722 657Canaday Nebraska 2226 1 82 75Lon D Wright Power Plant Nebraska 2240 50T 2 1Lon D Wright Power Plant Nebraska 2240 8 1,350 515C W Burdick Nebraska 2241 B-3 0 3C W Burdick Nebraska 2241 GT-2 2 3C W Burdick Nebraska 2241 GT-3 2 2J Street Nebraska 2250 1 0 1Hallam Nebraska 2265 1 4 3Hebron Nebraska 2266 1 2 1McCook Nebraska 2271 1 2 1Sheldon Nebraska 2277 1 2,309 881Sheldon Nebraska 2277 2 2,544 970Jones Street Nebraska 2290 1 1 1Jones Street Nebraska 2290 2 1 1North Omaha Station Nebraska 2291 1 1,310 500North Omaha Station Nebraska 2291 2 1,784 681North Omaha Station Nebraska 2291 3 1,784 680North Omaha Station Nebraska 2291 4 2,064 787North Omaha Station Nebraska 2291 5 3,645 1,390Sarpy County Nebraska 2292 1 5 36Sarpy County Nebraska 2292 2 5 36Sarpy County Station Nebraska 2292 CT3 1 22Sarpy County Station Nebraska 2292 CT4A 0 13Sarpy County Station Nebraska 2292 CT4B 0 13Sarpy County Station Nebraska 2292 CT5A 0 9Sarpy County Station Nebraska 2292 CT5B 0 10Gerald Gentleman Station Nebraska 6077 1 13,780 5,256Gerald Gentleman Station Nebraska 6077 2 15,116 5,765Nebraska City Station Nebraska 6096 1 12,313 4,696Nebraska City Station Nebraska 6096 2 3,377 4,180Rokeby Nebraska 6373 1 2 5Rokeby Nebraska 6373 2 0 11Rokeby Nebraska 6373 3 0 13Terry Bundy Generating Station Nebraska 7887 SVGS2 0 45Terry Bundy Generating Station Nebraska 7887 SVGS3 1 48Complete Allocations Page 1Plant Name StateORISID Boiler IDSO2Allocation2016 (tons)NOx AnnualAllocation2016 (tons)Terry Bundy Generating Station Nebraska 7887 SVGS4 0 20Beatrice Nebraska 8000 1 1 11Beatrice Nebraska 8000 2 1 10Cass County Station Nebraska 55972 CT1 0 19Cass County Station Nebraska 55972 CT2 0 20Complete Allocations Page 2
§ 247.37 Civil rights requirements. ( a ) *What are the civil rights requirements that apply to CSFP?* State and local agencies must comply with the requirements of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d *et seq.*), Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (20 U.S.C. 1681 *et seq.*), section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794 *et seq.*), the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 (42 U.S.C. 6101 *et seq.*), and titles II and III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 *et seq.*). State and local agencies must also comply with the Department's regulations on nondiscrimination (parts 15, 15a, and 15b of this title), and with the provisions of FNS Instruction 113-2, including the collection of racial/ethnic participation data and public notification of nondiscrimination policy. State and local agencies must ensure that no person shall, on the grounds of race, color, national origin, age, sex, or disability, be subjected to discrimination under the program.
( b ) *How does an applicant or participant file a complaint of discrimination?* CSFP applicants or participants who believe they have been discriminated against should file a discrimination complaint with the USDA Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-9410, or telephone (202) 720-5964.
#### § 27.34 Classification procedure.

Classification shall proceed as rapidly as possible, but not when light or other conditions make uncertain the accuracy of the results to be obtained.
#### § 201.24 Code designation.

The code designation used in lieu of the full name and address of the interstate shipper pursuant to § 201.23(a) shall be approved by the Administrator of the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) or such other person designated by the Administrator for the purpose. When used, the AMS code designation shall appear on the label in a clear and legible manner, along with the full name and address of the consignee.

[85 FR 40580, July 7, 2020]
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Ruths Hospitality Group, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 28,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 5, 2009



/s/ ROBERT M. VINCENTRobert M. VincentExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Ruths Hospitality Group, Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
                              MICROLOG CORPORATION
                              FORM 10K AT 10/31/99
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         000792094
<NAME>                        MICROLOG CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         3,425,000
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,305,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   150,000
<INVENTORY>                                    375,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               8,560,000
<PP&E>                                         3,009,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,092,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6,426,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,438,000
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          76,000
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     2,728,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,804,000
<SALES>                                        18,023,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               18,023,000
<CGS>                                          13,446,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  22,777,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               132,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             71,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,693,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,693,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,693,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (1.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (1.02)



</TABLE>
#### § 1737.3 Availability of RUS forms.

Single copies of RUS forms and publications cited in this part are available from Administrative Services Division, Rural Utilities Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC 20250. These RUS forms and publications may be reproduced. The terms “RUS form”, “RUS standard form”, and “RUS specification” have the same meanings as the terms “REA form” “REA standard form”, and “REA specification”, respectively, unless otherwise indicated.

[54 FR 13356, Apr. 3, 1989. Redesignated at 55 FR 39396, Sept. 27, 1990, as amended at 59 FR 66441, Dec. 27, 1994]
The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, United States District

1

Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.

 

No. 96-1258

 

Russell Perrymore, *

*

 Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Western

 v. * District of Arkansas.

 *

Cooper Communities, Inc., * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

 Appellee. *

 

Submitted: September 10, 1996

Filed: October 1, 1996

 

Before MAGILL, FLOYD R. GIBSON, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit

Judges.

 

PER CURIAM.

Russell Perrymore appeals the grant of summary judgment to Cooper

Communities, Inc., in a case involving alleged wrongful discharge, age

discrimination, and outrage. We have read all of the materials submitted

by the parties and have considered their arguments. We see no error by the

district court and therefore affirm the judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 1

A true copy.

Attest:

 CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### § 1726.303 Promulgation of new or revised contract forms.

RUS may, from time to time, undertake to promulgate new contract forms or revise or eliminate existing contract forms. In so doing, RUS shall publish notice of rulemaking in the Federal Register announcing, as appropriate, a revision in, or a proposal to amend § 1726.304, List of Electric Program Standard Contract Forms. The amendment may change the existing identification of a listed contract form; for example, changing the issuance date of a listed contract form or by identifying a new required contract form. The notice of rulemaking will describe the new standard contract form or the substantive change in the listed contract form, as the case may be, and the issues involved. The standard contract form or relevant portions thereof may be appended to the supplementary information section of the notice of rulemaking. As appropriate, the document shall provide an opportunity for interested persons to provide comments. A copy of each such Federal Register document will be sent by regular or electronic mail to all borrowers.

[63 FR 58287, Oct. 30, 1998]
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 15

- 00012

- CR

Mark Thomas

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 367th District Court

of Denton County (F

- 2010

- 2706

- E)

March 5, 2015

Opinion by Justice Sudderth

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for

want of jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

________________ Justice Bonnie Sudderth
§ 240.3 Cash in lieu of donated foods for program schools. ( a ) Not later than June 1 of each school year, FNS shall make an estimate of the value of agricultural commodities and other foods that will be delivered to States during the school year under the food distribution regulations (7 CFR part 250) for use in program schools. If the estimated value is less than the total value of assistance authorized under section 6(e) of the Act for the National School Lunch Program, FNS shall determine the difference between the value of the foods then programmed for each State for the school year and the required value and shall pay the difference to each State agency not later than July 1 of that school year.
( b ) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, in any State in which FNS administers the National School Lunch Program in any of the schools of the State, FNS shall withhold from the funds payable to that State under this section an amount equal to the ratio of the number of lunches served in schools in which the program is administered by FNS to the total number of lunches served in all program schools in the State.
[47 FR 15982, Apr. 13, 1982, as amended at 52 FR 7267, Mar. 10, 1987; 58 FR 39120, July 22, 1993]
#### § 29.1112 Rule 6.

A lot of tobacco on the marginal line between two colors shall be placed in the color with which it best corresponds with respect to body or other associated elements of quality.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

JAMES HUNTER POOLE,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:19cv4928/LAC/EMT

TROY BREEDLOVE, JR., et al.,

Defendants.

____________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge’s 

Report and Recommendation dated March 11, 2020 (ECF No. 9). Efforts have been 

made to furnish Plaintiff a copy of the Report and Recommendation and give him 

an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 

636(b)(1). All mail has been returned as undeliverable. No objections have been 

filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined it 

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted 

and incorporated by reference in this order.
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:19cv4928/LAC/EMT

2. This matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for Plaintiff’s 

failure to keep the court apprised of his mailing address.

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 9th day of April, 2020.

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

s/L.A. Collier
#### § 1780.38 [Reserved]
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.37



                               AMENDMENT NO. 10
                                    TO THE
                      HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC.
                     1991 NON-STATUTORY STOCK OPTION PLAN

                          Effective December 5, 2000


     WHEREAS, Health Management Associates, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company"), has established the Health Management Associates, Inc. 1991 Non-
Statutory Stock Option Plan, effective May 14, 1991, as heretofore amended (the
"1991 Option Plan"); and

     WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the 1991 Option Plan pursuant to
Section 11 of the 1991 Option Plan in the manner herein set forth;

     NOW, THEREFORE, the first paragraph of Section 10 of the 1991 Option Plan
is hereby amended and replaced in its entirety, to provide as follows (with the
second paragraph of said Section 10 remaining unchanged by this Amendment):

     "10. Form of Options and Conditions to Their Exercise. Each option by its
terms will provide that it is not transferable by the grantee otherwise than by
will or the laws of descent and distribution, and that it is exercisable, during
the lifetime of the grantee, only by him; provided, however, that the Committee,
in its discretion, may permit a grantee to transfer an option owned by him to a
trust of which he is the sole lifetime trustee and sole lifetime beneficiary."

     Except as amended hereby, the 1991 Option Plan shall remain in full force
and effect in accordance with its terms.

     This Amendment No. 10 to the Health Management Associates, Inc. 1991 Non-
Statutory Stock Option Plan was authorized, approved and adopted by the Board of
Directors of the Company on December 5, 2000.


                                          /s/ Timothy R. Parry
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Timothy R. Parry, Corporate Secretary

                                      58
###### Editorial Note on [Part 1944](/current/title-7/part-1944?toc=1)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1944 appear at [80 FR 9885](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/80-FR-9885), Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1944.512 Authorized representative of the applicant.

Rural Development will deal only with authorized representatives designed by the applicant. The authorized representatives must have no pecuniary interest in any of the following as they would relate in any way to the TSA grant: the award of any engineering, architectural, management, administration, or construction contracts; purchase of the furnishings, fixtures or equipment; or purchase and/or development of land.

Note:

Rural Development has designated the District Office as the primary point of contact for all matters relating to the TSA program and as the office responsible for the administration of approved TSA projects.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Petitioner

v.

ALBERT FRASCHETTI,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 188 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of October, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Barge Line Company (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark R. Holden, Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.                        /s/       Mark R. Holden   Mark R. Holden   President and Chief Executive Officer   November 13, 2006
73
**DM** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19 - 0 646 STATE OF MONTANA ,

P la intiff and Appell ee , v. V. NAVA CRUZITA CONNOR ,

Defendant and Appell an

t . **ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 6 0 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including August 2 6 , 2020 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief

.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 22 2020

06/22/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0646
| 1.   | The      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      June 16, 2009 | /s/      Brian M. Carter                                                                                                     |
|--------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |      Brian      M. Carter, Chief Executive          and Chief Financial Officer |
|                     |                                                                                                                         |