Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 219 / Monday, November 15, 2010 / Notices 69715 

1Notice of United States Postal Service of Filing 

Five Functionally Equivalent Global Expedited 

Package Services 3 Negotiated Service Agreements 

and Application For Non-Public Treatment of 

Materials Filed Under Seal, November 5, 2010 

(Notice). 

CFRWs and has no relation to security 

issues. Therefore, the common defense 

and security is not impacted by this 

exemption. 

Special Circumstances 

Special circumstances, in accordance 

with 10 CFR 50.12(a)(2)(iii) is present 

whenever ‘‘compliance would result in 

undue hardship or other costs that are 

significantly in excess of those 

contemplated when the regulation as 

adopted, or that are significantly in 

excess of those incurred by others 

similarly situated.’’ The underlying 

purpose of 10 CFR 50.10 is to define 

clearly the licensing requirements for a 

LWA. The applicant has demonstrated 

and the NRC staff has confirmed that the 

influence of the CFRWs on interactions 

with the SSCs will have a negligible 

nexus to safety. The applicant also cites 

undue hardship or other costs as a 

special circumstance that would 

warrant granting this exemption. The 

applicant has provided two potentially 

viable alternate construction plans to 

avoid delay in their schedule: (1) 

Redesign the CFRWs to make it more 

practical to remove prior to fuel load 

and (2) increase the size of the 

excavation and locate the crane in the 

excavation. STPNOC states that both 

options will increase the construction 

cost by $22 million and $260 million 

respectively. Therefore, since the 

underlying purpose of 10 CFR 50.10 is 

still being achieved concerning the 

safety of the SSCs during construction 

activities and the applicant has 

demonstrated an undue hardship, the 

special circumstance required by 10 

CFR 50.12(a)(2)(iii) for the granting of an 

exemption from 10 CFR 50.10 exists. 

The applicant has also provided 

information on this proposed action 

pursuant to 10 CFR 50.12(b) which 

states any person may request an 

exemption permitting the conduct of 

activities prior to the issuance of the 

construction permit prohibited by 10 

CFR 50.10. The balancing factors for 

granting such an exemption are 

evaluated in the environmental 

assessment (EA) that is attached to this 

package. The ADAMS Accession 

number for this associated EA is 

ML101580541. 

4.0 Conclusion 

Accordingly, the Commission has 

determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR 

50.12(a) and 10 CFR 50.12(b), the 

exemption is authorized by law, will not 

present an undue risk to the public 

health and safety, and is consistent with 

the common defense and security. Also, 

special circumstances are present. 

Therefore, the Commission hereby 

grants South Texas Project Nuclear 

Operating Company an exemption from 

the requirements in 10 CFR 50.10 for the 

installation of the CFRWs for Units 3 

and 4. 

Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.32, the 

Commission has determined that the 

granting of this exemption will not have 

a significant effect on the quality of the 

human environment (75 FR 67784). 

This exemption is effective upon 

issuance. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland on November 

5, 2010. 

For the Commission. 

David B. Matthews, 

Director, Division of New Reactor Licensing, 

Office of New Reactors. 

[FR Doc. 2010–28638 Filed 11–12–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL 

MANAGEMENT 

Privacy Act of 1974: New System of 

Records 

AGENCY: U.S. Office of Personnel 

Management (OPM). 

ACTION: Notice to extend comment 

period for a new system of records. 

SUMMARY: OPM is extending the 

comment period for a new system of 

records, OPM/Central-15, Health Claims 

Data Warehouse, until December 15, 

2010. The initial notice for this system 

was published on October 5, 2010, and 

provided a comment period deadline of 

November 15, 2010. Based on the 

comments we have received since we 

published the initial notice, OPM is 

considering revisions to the systems 

notice to, among other things, provide 

greater specificity regarding the 

authorities for maintaining the system, 

clarify its intent to significantly limit 

the circumstances under which 

personally identifiable records may be 

released, and provide a more detailed 

explanation of how the records in this 

system will be protected and secured. If 

OPM publishes a revised systems 

notice, the public will have the 

opportunity to comment on the revised 

notice before OPM begins operating the 

system. In the meantime, OPM is 

extending the opportunity for interested 

persons, organizations, and agencies to 

review and provide comments pursuant 

to the October 5, 2010 system notice. 

DATES: The comment period is extended 

until December 15, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to 

the Office of Personnel Management, 

Attn: Gary A. Lukowski, Ph.D., 

Manager, Data Analysis, U. S. Office of 

Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, 

NW., Room 7439, Washington, DC 

20415 or to gary.lukowski@opm.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary 

A. Lukowski, Ph.D., Manager, Data 

Analysis, at 202–606–1449. 

U.S. Office of Personnel Management. 

John Berry, 

Director. 

[FR Doc. 2010–28834 Filed 11–12–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6325–46–P 

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION 

[Docket Nos. MC2010–28 and CP2011–28 

Through 32; Order No. 582] 

New Postal Product 

AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a 

recently-filed Postal Service request to 

add five additional Global Expedited 

Package Services 3 (GEPS 3) contracts to 

the competitive product list. This 

document describes the Postal Service’s 

filing, including its interest in and 

rationale for including the contracts 

within the existing GEPS 3 product, and 

addresses several related procedural 

matters. These include an opportunity 

for public comment. 

DATES: Comment deadline: November 

16, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments 

electronically using the Commission’s 

Filing Online system at 

http.www.prc.gov. Those who cannot 

submit comments electronically should 

call the person identified in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section 

for advice on alternatives. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel, 

at 202–789–6824 or 

stephen.sharfman@prc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents 

I. Introduction 

II. Notice of Filing 

III. Ordering Paragraphs 

I. Introduction 

On November 5, 2010, the Postal 

Service filed a notice announcing that it 

has entered into five additional Global 

Expedited package Services 3 (GEPS 3) 

contracts.1 The Postal Service believes 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
69716 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 219 / Monday, November 15, 2010 / Notices 

2 Docket No. CP2009–50, Order Granting 

Clarification and Adding Global Expedited Package 

Services 2 to the Competitive Product List, August 

28, 2009 (Order No. 290). 

the instant contracts are functionally 

equivalent to previously submitted 

GEPS contracts, and are supported by 

Governors’ Decision No. 08–7, attached 

to the Notice and originally filed in 

Docket No. CP2008–4. Id. at 1, 

Attachment 3. The Notice explains that 

Order No. 86, which established GEPS 

1 as a product, also authorized 

functionally equivalent agreements to be 

included within the product, provided 

that they meet the requirements of 39 

U.S.C. 3633. Id. at 2. In Order No. 290, 

the Commission approved the GEPS 2 

product.2 In Order No. 503, the 

Commission approved the GEPS 3 

product. Additionally, the Postal 

Service requested to have the contract in 

Docket No. CP2010–71 serve as the 

baseline contract for future functional 

equivalence analyses of the GEPS 3 

product. 

The instant contracts. The Postal 

Service filed the instant contracts 

pursuant to 39 CFR 3015.5. In addition, 

the Postal Service contends that each 

contract is in accordance with Order No. 

86. The term of each contract is one year 

from the date the Postal Service notifies 

the customer that all necessary 

regulatory approvals have been 

received. Notice at 3. 

In support of its Notice, the Postal 

Service filed four attachments as 

follows: 

• Attachments 1A through 1E— 

redacted copies of the five contracts and 

applicable annexes; 

• Attachments 2A through 2E— 

certified statements required by 39 CFR 

3015.5(c)(2) for each contract; 

• Attachment 3—a redacted copy of 

Governors’ Decision No. 08–7 which 

establishes prices and classifications for 

GEPS contracts, a description of 

applicable GEPS contracts, formulas for 

prices, an analysis of the formulas, and 

certification of the Governors’ vote; and 

• Attachment 4—an application for 

non–public treatment of materials to 

maintain redacted portions of the 

contracts and supporting documents 

under seal. 

The Notice advances reasons why the 

instant GEPS 3 contracts fit within the 

Mail Classification Schedule language 

for the GEPS 3 product. The Postal 

Service identifies customer-specific 

information and general contract terms 

that distinguish the instant contracts 

from the baseline GEPS 3 agreement. Id. 

at 4–5. It states that the differences, 

which include price variations based on 

updated costing information and 

volume commitments, do not alter the 

contracts’ functional equivalency. Id. at 

3–4. The Postal Service asserts that 

‘‘[b]ecause the agreements incorporate 

the same cost attributes and 

methodology, the relevant 

characteristics of these five GEPS 

contracts are similar, if not the same, as 

the relevant characteristics of previously 

filed contracts.’’ Id. at 4. 

The Postal Service concludes that its 

filings demonstrate that each of the new 

GEPS 3 contracts complies with the 

requirements of 39 U.S.C. 3633 and is 

functionally equivalent to the baseline 

GEPS 3 contract. Therefore, it requests 

that the instant contracts be included 

within the GEPS 3 product. Id. at 5. 

II. Notice of Filing 

The Commission establishes Docket 

Nos. CP2011–28 through CP2011–32 for 

consideration of matters related to the 

contracts identified in the Postal 

Service’s Notice. 

These dockets are addressed on a 

consolidated basis for purposes of this 

order. Filings with respect to a 

particular contract should be filed in 

that docket. 

Interested persons may submit 

comments on whether the Postal 

Service’s contracts are consistent with 

the policies of 39 U.S.C. 3632, 3633, or 

3642. Comments are due no later than 

November 16, 2010. The public portions 

of these filings can be accessed via the 

Commission’s Web site (http:// 

www.prc.gov). 

The Commission appoints Paul L. 

Harrington to serve as Public 

Representative in the captioned 

proceedings. 

III. Ordering Paragraphs 

It is ordered: 

1. The Commission establishes Docket 

Nos. CP2011–28 through CP2011–32 for 

consideration of matters raised by the 

Postal Service’s Notice. 

2. Comments by interested persons in 

these proceedings are due no later than 

November 16, 2010. 

3. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Paul L. 

Harrington is appointed to serve as the 

officer of the Commission (Public 

Representative) to represent the 

interests of the general public in these 

dockets. 

4. The Secretary shall arrange for 

publication of this order in the Federal 

Register. 

By the Commission. 

Shoshana M. Grove, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2010–28584 Filed 11–12–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD 

Agency Forms Submitted for OMB 

Review, Request for Comments 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. chapter 35), the Railroad 

Retirement Board (RRB) is forwarding 

an Information Collection Request (ICR) 

to the Office of Information and 

Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) to 

request approval of a new information 

collection, consisting of proposed RRB 

Form G–252, Self-Employment/ 

Corporate Officer Work and Earnings 

Monitoring. Our ICR describes the 

information we seek to collect from the 

public. Completion is required to obtain 

or retain benefits. One response is 

required of each respondent. Review 

and approval by OIRA ensures that we 

impose appropriate paperwork burdens. 

The RRB invites comments on the 

proposed collection of information to 

determine (1) the practical utility of the 

collection; (2) the accuracy of the 

estimated burden of the collection; (3) 

ways to enhance the quality, utility and 

clarity of the information that is the 

subject of collection; and (4) ways to 

minimize the burden of collections on 

respondents, including the use of 

automated collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology. 

Comments to RRB or OIRA must contain 

the OMB control number of the ICR. For 

proper consideration of your comments, 

it is best if RRB and OIRA receive them 

within 30 days of publication date. 

Previous Requests for Comments: The 

RRB has already published the initial 

60-day notice (75 FR 16876 on April 2, 

2010) required by 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2). 

That request elicited no comments. 

Information Collection Request (ICR) 

Title: Self-Employment/Corporate 

Officer Work and Earnings Monitoring. 

OMB Control Number: 3220–XXXX. 

Form(s) submitted: G–252. 

Type of request: New information 

collection. 

Affected public: Individuals or 

households. 

Abstract: To determine entitlement or 

continued entitlement to a disability 

annuity, the RRB will obtain 

information from disability annuitants 

who claim to be self-employed or a 

corporate officer or who the RRB 

determines to be self-employed or a 

corporate officer after a continuing 

disability review. 

Changes Proposed: N.A. 

The burden estimate for the ICR is as 

follows: 

Estimated annual number of 

respondents: 100. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES