alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2045 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2045

To prohibit officers and employees of the Internal Revenue Service from 
                initiating any new audits for 180 days.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 17, 2013

 Mr. Fleming (for himself, Mr. Rooney, Mr. Chabot, Mr. Culberson, and 
Mr. Benishek) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit officers and employees of the Internal Revenue Service from 
                initiating any new audits for 180 days.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``HALT the IRS Act''.

SEC. 2. SUSPENSION OF AUTHORITY OF IRS TO INITIATE NEW AUDITS.

    An officer or employee of the Internal Revenue Service shall not 
initiate any new audit of any taxpayer during the 180-day period 
beginning with the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal Nos. 10-58]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601-3740.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittals 10-58 with attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

Dated: November 9, 2010.

Morgan F. Park,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison  Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 69972)          ( print page 69973)          ( print page 69974)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P

[FR Doc. 2010-28772 Filed 11-15-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
#### § 201.8 Contents of the label.

The label shall contain the required information in any form that is clearly legible and complies with the regulations in this part. The information may be on a tag attached securely to the container, or may be printed in a conspicuous manner on a side or the top of the container. The label may contain information in addition to that required by the Act, provided such information is not misleading.

[5 FR 30 Jan. 4, 1940, as amended at 24 FR 3952, May 15, 1959; 85 FR 40579, July 7, 2020]
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter C of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter C appear by Amdt. 381, 65 FR 64586, Oct. 30, 2000.

###### Editorial Note on Part 273

#### Editorial Notes:

1. OMB control numbers relating to this part 273 are contained in § 271.8.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 273 appear at 84 FR 15093, Apr. 15, 2019.

#### § 273.32 Households that return to TANF, MOE, or SFCA program during the transitional period.

If a household receiving transitional benefits starts to receive TANF, MOE, or SFCA program during the transitional period, the State agency shall use the information from the TANF, MOE, or SFCA application to re-determine continued SNAP eligibility and benefits, at the same time that the TANF, MOE, or SFCA application is being processed and follow procedures in § 273.2(j) for joint processing of SNAP/TANF applications. This includes processing the application within 30 days. However, for a household assigned a new certification period in accordance with § 273.27(c), the household must be recertified if it returns to TANF, MOE, or the SFCA program during its transitional period.

[82 FR 2044, Jan. 6, 2017
LADCO Midwest Wood Smoke St

Grand Rapids Case Study

Dr. David Snyder

Department of Chemistry

University of Wisconsin – Stevens Point
Purpose

Non-regulatory study intended to provide citizens of the town of Grand Rapids with information regarding: – Winter-time air quality levels in the comm

– The role of wood smoke in affecting local a

quality
Wood County/ Grand Rapids

Pop. 7
PM2.5 Concentrations in Wisc

29 

26 

29 

31 

21 

19 

25 

33 

27 

29 29 31 

28 32 32 31 

2009 – 2011 MonitorinUnits: micrograms pe(μg/m

3

)

WDNR PM2.5 Monito
Study Details

• 3 Fixed sites

– Central site FRM 

and organic spe

– Remote sites re

PM2.5

– Wind speed/di

• Mobile PM2.5 M
Statewide 24-Hour PM2.5 Concentra
24-Hour PM2.5 Concentration

Grand Rapids Study Sites
Organics Source Apportionm
Source Contributions to PM2.5 Concentrations in Gran

(PM2.5 > 18 μg/m

3

)

Wood Smoke

27%

Natural Gas

1%

Mobile Sources

3% Other 

Organics

14%

Inorganic Ions

41%

Unidentified 

Inorganics

14% 
Wood Smoke in Grand Rapid
1-Hr PM2.5 Concentrations

Grand Rapids Study Sites
Pollution Roses

Arrows indicate wind direction

Mobile Monitoring, January 20th, 
Mobile Monitoring, January 20th, 
Study Findings

• PM2.5 air quality in Grand Rapids meets 24-hr regu

standards

• Significant spikes in shorter-term (1-hr and 5 min)• High concentrations observed during mobile moni

residential areas

• On average, wood smoke accounted for 17% of PM

(range 0 – 63%)

• Final project report can be found at: www.ladco.o
Acknowledgements

• Lake Michigan Air Director’s Consortium (LADCO)• Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources• Wisconsin Department of Health Services• University of Wisconsin Cooperative Extension• Wood County Health Department• Wood County UW-Extension• UWSP Student Researchers: Jake Fahrenkrog, Travis Kahl, Ethan 

and Jerad Servais
98-1996.

#### State v. Thompson.

Cuyahoga App. No. 74206. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOUND ON
PAGES 22-25 OF THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED MAY 31, 1998, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                          46,965
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  165,105
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,628
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               260,116
<PP&E>                                         157,386
<DEPRECIATION>                                 131,892
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 573,110
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,700,346
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,155
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,270,920)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   573,110
<SALES>                                        456,715
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               456,715
<CGS>                                          483,861
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  483,861
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,157
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 857
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (39,303)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   475,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            435,897
<DISCONTINUED>                                 755,123
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,191,020
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19
        

</TABLE>
Certain Compensation Arrangements Company Board of Directors



 Exhibit 10.17 
  
 CERTAIN COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS 
 WITH HEALTH NET, INC.’S 
 NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS 
  
 Upon recommendation of the Governance Committee of the Board of Directors of
Health Net, Inc. (the “Company”), the Board of Directors of the Company has approved the payment of the following compensation to each non-employee director of the Board in respect of his/her service on the Board: 
  

	 	•	 	an annual retainer of $30,000 per year for each non-employee director (other than the Chairman of the Board); 

  

	 	•	 	an annual retainer of $5,000 for each Chair of the Compensation Committee, Governance Committee and Finance Committee; 

  

	 	•	 	an annual retainer of $15,000 for the Chair of the Audit Committee; 

  

	 	•	 	meeting fee of $2,000 for each meeting of the Board of Directors attended, and a $1,000 fee for each committee meeting attended, other than the Audit Committee, which meeting fee is
$2,000 for each audit committee meeting attended; 

  

	 	•	 	in lieu of the above listed retainer and meeting fees, the Chairman of the Board receives $15,833 per month, for his services; and 

  

	 	•	 	reimbursement of customary expenses for attending Board, committee and shareholder meetings. 

  
 In addition, the non-employee directors of the Company are eligible to participate in the Company’s Third Amended and
Restated Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (the “Director Plan”) and the Company’s 1998 Stock Option Plan (the “1998 Plan”). Under the Director Plan, 500,000 shares of Common Stock are reserved for initial grants of
nonqualified stock options to directors when they join the Company’s Board and automatic annual grants of nonqualified stock options on each year such director is re-elected to the Company’s Board. Each non-employee director grant entitles
the optionee to purchase the granted number of shares of Common Stock (which number is determined pursuant to grant formula provisions in the Director Plan) at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of Common Stock on the date of such
grant. Each grant vests as to 33 1/3% of the shares each year on the anniversary of the date of the grant,
provided that the options become immediately exercisable in the event of a “change in control” of the Company, as defined in the Director Plan and 1998 Plan, as applicable 
  
 Furthermore, the Company maintains a deferred compensation plan pursuant to
which non-employee directors are eligible to defer up to 100% of their compensation. The compensation deferred under such plan is credited with earnings or losses measured by the rate of return on investments elected by plan participants. Each plan
participant is fully vested in all deferred compensation and earnings credited to his or her account.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As      Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),                as                applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                          |   | /s/                Maurice S. Reznik         |
|-------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|                          |   | Maurice                S. Reznik             |
|                          |   | Chief                Executive Officer       |
|                          |   | (principal                executive officer) |
|                          |   |                                         |
| August                6, 2008 |   |                                         |

*This      certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that      section, nor shall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing      under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except      to the extent the Company specifically incorporates it by      reference.*

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 1944

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1944 appear at 80 FR 9885, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### §§ 1944.64-1944.65 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 21

                        SUBSIDIARIES OF UNUM CORPORATION

Listed below are the subsidiaries of UNUM Corporation, as of December 31, 1998,
with their respective jurisdiction of incorporation.

UNUM Holding Company (Delaware)

                 First UNUM Life Insurance Company (New York)
                 Claims Service International, Inc. (Delaware)
                 UNUM International Underwriters Inc. (Delaware)

UNUM Life Insurance Company of America (Maine)

Colonial Companies, Inc. (Delaware)

                 Colonial Life & Accident Insurance Company (South Carolina)
                 BenefitAmerica, Inc. (South Carolina)

Options and Choices, Inc. (Wyoming)

UNUM European Holding Company Limited (United Kingdom)

                 UNUM Management Company Limited (United Kingdom)
                 UNUM Limited (United Kingdom)
                 Claims Services International Limited (United Kingdom)

Duncanson & Holt, Inc. (New York)

                 Duncanson & Holt Services, Inc. (Maine)
                 Duncanson & Holt Administrative Services, Inc. (Delaware)
                 Duncanson & Holt Canada Ltd. (Canada)
                 Duncanson & Holt Asia PTE Ltd. (Singapore)
                 Duncanson & Holt Europe Ltd. (United Kingdom)

                     Duncanson & Holt Underwriters Ltd. (United Kingdom)
                     Duncanson & Holt Agencies Ltd. (United Kingdom)
                     Duncanson & Holt Syndicate Management Ltd. (United Kingdom)
                     Trafalgar Underwriting Agencies Ltd. (United Kingdom)

UNUM Japan Accident Insurance Company Limited (Japan)

UNUM International Ltd. (Bermuda)

Boston Compania Argentina de Seguros (Argentina)
98-1431.

#### State v. Butler.

Franklin App. No. 97APA10-1430. *Sua sponte,*cause consolidated with 98-1534, *supra,*and held for the decision in 97-1985, *State v. Cook,*Allen App. No. 1-97-21; briefing schedule stayed.
#### Arthur Seigel et al., Appellants, v. Prima Concrete Construction Corp. et al., Defendants; Long Island National Bank ot Hicksville, Respondent-Appellant, and Alpat Construction Co., Inc., et al., Respondents.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered October 26, 1965, modified, on the law, by (1) striking out so much of its first decretal paragraph as dismissed the complaints as against defendant Long Island National Bank of Hioksville and so much of its second decretal paragraph as dismissed said defendant’s cross complaints (deemed third-party complaints) against defendants Stanley Miller and Great Plains Shopping, Inc., and (2) severing plaintiff’s cause against defendant Long Island National Bank of Hioksville and the latter’s cross complaint insofar as it is against defendants Stanley Miller and Great Plains Shopping, Inc., and granting a new trial as to said severed cause and cross complaint, with costs to abide the event. As so modified, judgment affirmed, insofar as appealed from, without costs. No questions of fact have been considered. In this consolidated action to recover for injuries suffered when plaintiffs, employees of a general contractor, entered a bank vault in which an explosion occurred because of an alleged concentration therein of propane gas, plaintiffs’ complaints were dismissed at the end of their case after testimony and an offer of proof had been given. In our opinion, a jury could have found that for approximately 16 hours between the late afternoon of November 20 and the early morning of November 21, 1956, the defendant Bank had possession and control of the bank building, construction of which had almost been completed. The jury could have further found, that the Bank knew that portable heater units using propane gas had been located in the building for use by paint and tile contractors of the Bank and that one such unit had been placed in the bank vault, the door of which had been closed during this 16-hour period. Finally, the jury could have found that, contrary to an alleged custom and practice, the Bank failed to inspect the building’s premises *947during this 16-hour period to determine whether a dangerous condition had arisen from the use of the heaters, and that, had such an inspection been made, the closed vault door would have been opened and either the lit unit within would have been turned off or, the unit’s light having been extinguished because of inadequate ventilation, the Bank would have discovered the gas-filled condition of the vault. The Bank had a nondelegable duty to provide plaintiffs with a safe place to work (Labor Law, § 200; *Olsen*v. *Chase Manhattan Bank,*10 A D 2d 539, 543, affd. 9 N Y 2d 829) and an aspect of that duty was the detection of dangers discoverable by reasonable diligence *(Employers Mut. Liab. Ins. Co.*v. *Di Cesare & Monaco Concrete Constr. Corp.,*9 A D 2d 379, 382). Brennan, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.
## Proteding Uodergaouod Sources ofDriDking Water from**Uoderg~** 

## ouod Iojectioo (UIC) Underground lnjeetion The Ull.llagt-d liljcdicm Cmmol pmgramrqnl..... the comllu£tiaD, ClpiD1icm, 

### p:rmillin& IIDil domn: ofinjeclion

## wen. uaed toplace flv.ida 1mclcrgtaund fmll1cnge or 

### di.-'. Leur! IliOn! •bo•t mjectioD WIIIJ t)'ptiL

1 2
0wueta 

### ancl opmtorB of iqjectiOD. 

### wella.**~ton.** 

### 81111 the public will 

### fillcl iDtOJw!djon OD 

### safe injediOD wdl 

### opemticm. Safe 

### operation will pJeVent contamiaation 

### ofunder:griJUWi S01Imll 

### ofdriDkiDg water. 

## VIC Well Classes

Class I indllstr:ial 

### end municipal waste disposal 

### wells Class 

### n oil and gas 

### related injection 

### wells Class 

### m solution mining 

### wells Class IV shallow hazardous 8lld radioactive waste injection 

### wells Class V wells that injeoct 

### non-hazardous fluids 

### into 

### or abow 

### undeqround SO\Il"CejJ ofdrinking water 

### Class VI geologic scquesm.tion wells

## lnjectioa Related Activities

Aqllifer rechaxge and aquifer ston1ge and recovery Aquifer exemptions FiMncial 

### responsibilities National Technical**Wo~** 

## About 

# me Wells

Basic infomJ.ation UIC program primac;y Compliance tepo:tting requirmumlll Ormrts UIC egulations Injection well invenmry 

# me Where You Live EPA ]1118 tal

### regional offices. Earh regicmal office ovmees local atate, 

### ta'ritmy, anti tribal UIC 

### activities. Select

### your state from 

### the me:uu 

### below, or click on your region 1D filld local UJC illfonnation about 

### Public notice8 PermiUiltg 8lld regialm1ionA l eMma I

NV CA 

## 0

10 

## 0



# .. Ul**~.L** 

# I· ., lilt\ NO 

## "" so WI



## 0 NE 

## 8 IN L cu K.S 1,0() IN 

## 0 AA

..... 

## $ · ' 

# I 

# I**~**

# ~
###### Editorial Note on Part 1955

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1955 appear at 80 FR 9895, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1955.124 Sale with inventory real estate (chattel).

Inventory chattel property may be sold with inventory real estate if a higher aggregate price can be obtained. Proceeds from a joint sale will be applied to the respective inventory accounts based on the value of the property sold. Form RD 440-21 will be used to determine the value of the chattel property. The offer for the sale of the chattels will be documented by incorporating the terms and conditions of the sale of Form RD 1955-45 or Form RD 1955-46, and may be accepted by the appropriate approval official based upon the combined final sale price.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter C of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter C appear by Amdt. 381, 65 FR 64586, Oct. 30, 2000.

###### Editorial Note on Part 278

#### Editorial Note:

OMB control numbers relating to this part 278 are contained in § 271.8.

#### § 278.8 [Reserved]
###### Editorial Note on Part 1944

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1944 appear at 80 FR 9885, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1944.681 Application submission.

Applicants selected by Rural Development will be advised to submit a full application in an original and two copies of SF 424.1, and are to include any condition or amendments that must be incorporated into the statement of activities prior to submitting a full application. Instructions on submission and timing will be provided by FmHA or its successor agency under Public Law 103-354.
Amendment to 1998 Employee Share Purchase Plan



 Exhibit 10.5B 
  
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE XOMA LTD. 
 1998 EMPLOYEE SHARE PURCHASE PLAN 
  
 The XOMA Ltd. 1998 Employee Share Purchase Plan, as amended (the “Plan”), is hereby amended, effective as of January 1, 2005, as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Section 2(h) of the Plan is amended to read as follows: 

  
 “(h) “Offering Periods” shall mean consecutive three (3) month periods commencing once every calendar quarter
beginning on the first Trading Day on or after January 1, April 1, July 1 and October 1 of each year, and ending on the last Trading Day prior to the end of such three (3) month period.” 
  

	 	2.	Section 2(i) of the Plan is amended to read as follows: 

  
 “(i) “Purchase Price” shall mean with respect to new Offering Periods under the Plan commencing on or after January 1,
2005, the Purchase Price for such Offering periods shall be an amount equal to 95% of the Fair Market Value of a Common Share on the Exercise Date for that Offering Period.”
#### § 28.517 Leaf Grade No. 7.

American Pima cotton which in leaf is inferior to Leaf Grade No. 6 shall be designated as “Leaf Grade No. 7.”

[65 FR 36601, June 9, 2000]