alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS

*May 16, 2006*

[Cite as *05/16/2006 Case Announcements,*2006-Ohio-2403.]

*1464MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2006-0173.

#### State v. Parks.

Carroll App. No. 04CA803, 2005-Ohio-6926. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary-appeal and claimed appeal of right. On February 8, 2006, appellant filed a notice that a motion to certify a conflict was pending in the court of appeals and, pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(A), this court stayed consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in this appeal. Whereas appellant has neither notified this court that the court of appeals determined that a conflict does not exist as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(B) nor filed a copy of the court of appeals’ order certifying the existence of a conflict as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(C),

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that appellant show cause within fourteen days of the date of this entry why this court should not proceed to consider the jurisdictional memoranda in this appeal pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 111(6).
(115 App. Div. 836)

#### BARTLETT v. COOK.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

November 14, 1906.)

Trover and Conversion—Property Subject—Ownership.

Where plaintiff furnished the money with which to purchase a nontransferabie mileage book in the name of another, who used a portion of the mileage, paid plaintiff therefor, and surrendered the balance of the book to him, plaintiff was the owner of the book, so as to entitle him to recover for its conversion as against a person to whom he loaned the book for transportation, though neither plaintiff nor his bailee were entitled to use the book for transportation unless the carrier elected to waive the nontransferable condition therein.

Appeal from Steuben County Court.

*1037Action by Wesley A. Bartlett against Raymond Cook. From *a*judgment in favor of defendant, reversing a justice’s Judgment in favor of plaintiff, he appeals. Reversed, and justice’s judgment affirmed.

Argued before McLENNAN, P. J., and SPRING, WILLIAMS, and KRUSE, JJ.

James O. Sebring, for appellant.

Delmar M. Darrin, for respondent.

KRUSE, J.

The appeal in this case was argued with the appeal in the case of Cook v. Bartlett, 100 N. Y. Supp. 1032, and we need only supplement the facts set forth in the opinion in that case by stating that, subsequent to the termination of the criminal prosecution by the plaintiff against the defendant, an action was begun in justice’s court by the plaintiff against the defendant to recover the value of the mileage book, and the trial resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff against the defendant for the value thereof, $13:02, and judgment was entered by the justice upon the verdict for the sum of $13.02 damages and $5 costs.

An appeal was taken by the defendant from the judgment to the County Court of Steuben county, where the judgment was reversed upon the ground that the plaintiff was not the owner of the mileage book and acquired no title or interest therein, and therefore that the action was not maintainable. We have reached a different conclusion. We have fully set forth our views upon the question in the other case, and it is unnecessary to reiterate them. If we are right, it follows that the judgment of the County Court cannot be sustained.

The judgment of the County Court should be reversed, and that of the Justice’s Court affirmed, with costs in this court and in the County Court. All concur.
Editorial Note on Part 1948
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1948 appear at 80 FR 9888, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1948.72 Industry reports. Any person regularly engaged in any coal or uranium development activity within an area designated and approved in accordance with this subpart, shall prepare and transmit a report to the Secretary of Energy, Department of Energy, Mail Stop 8G-031, Forrestal Building, Washington, DC 20585 within 90 days after a written request to such person by the Governor of the State in which such area is located. ( a ) The report shall contain: ( 1 ) Projected levels of employment in coal or uranium development activities within the approved designated area for the next three calendar years;
( 2 ) The projected number of new jobs to be created in coal or uranium development activities by the person within the approved designated area in each of the following three calendar years;
( 3 ) Current or planned actions of the person in relation to the provision of housing or public facilities for such person's employees in the next three calendar years;
( 4 ) Contracts in force whereby the person intends to provide funds to State government, local governments, and public or private nonprofit organizations for the provision of housing or public facilities for such person's employees; and
( 5 ) The projected quantity of coal or uranium to be produced, processed, or transported by the person in each of the next three years.
( b ) The Governor requesting the report will notify the Secretary of Energy of persons from whom reports have been requested.
( c ) The Secretary of Energy shall provide a copy of these reports to the Secretary of Agriculture, the appropriate Governor, and the appropriate county or local officials, and make it available for public inspection and copying in the public reading room of the Department of Energy, Room GA152, Forrestal Building, Washington, DC 20585.
(4910-13-Pj

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

P.Oto- 0151 z:>

[Docket No. FAA-~-'~"''' 11 11; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-196-AD]

RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model CL-600-2CIO (Regional Jet Series 700,

701 & 702), Model CL-600-2DI5 (Regional Jet Series 705), and Model CL-600-2D24

(Regional Jet Series 900) Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the product

listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness

information (MeAl) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify

and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsa~

condition as:

Several cases have been reported of cracks in the joint extrusions securing

the outer bondrnent to the acoustic panel of the nacelle transcowl

assemblies. Although there is no effect on flight safety (thrust reverser

stowed), thrust reverser deployment under rejected take-off or emergency

landing load conditions could potentially result in acoustic panel failure

and possible runway debris.

'[)NC\) CES

Dl)TING SYMBOL

4JJ",-1

[NITTA •••·''''',

('~

m

'!./o'/1"

* * * * * * *

The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the unsafe conditi

described in the MeAl.
CONn RREIlCES

1

4910-13-P) ROl,Il'm;~nnlOl.

ANE-171

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

(Docket No. FAA-2009-*****; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-196-AD)

RlN 2120-AA64

Ainvorthiness Directives; Bombardier ModeJ CL-600-2C10 (Regional Jet Series 700,

701 & 702), Model CL-600-2Dl5 (Regional Jet Series 705), and Model CL-600-2D24

(Regional Jet Series 900) Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

SUl\1MARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products

listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness

infomlation (MeAl) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify

and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe

condition as:

Several cases have been reported of cracks in the joint extrusions securing

the outer bondment to the acoustic panel of the nacelle tmnscowl

assemblies. Although there is no effect on flight safety (thrust reverser

stowed), thrust reverser deployment under rejected take-off or emergency

landing load conditions could potentially result in acoustic panel failure

and possible runway debris.

ANE-171

"Al~

{,/"I,'

'NIT'A'.5IMO

~(IU'l"NC ~V"'"J1.

DATf.

• • • • • • •

""T1I\l.5IS>C

DATE

The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the unsafe condition

described in the MeAl.
#### § 29.2616 Rules.

The application of these official standard grades shall be in accordance with §§ 29.2617 through 29.2639.

[37 FR 13626, July 12, 1972, as amended at 49 FR 16757, Apr. 20, 1984]
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

 1000

 1500

 2000

 1000

18 12 06 00

07/17

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 17 Jul 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.41 N 76.30 W Meters AGL
§ 247.34 Management reviews. ( a ) *What must the State agency do to ensure that local agencies meet program requirements and objectives?* The State agency must establish a management review system to ensure that local agencies, subdistributing agencies, and other agencies conducting program activities meet program requirements and objectives. As part of the system, the State agency must perform an on-site review of all local agencies, and of all storage facilities utilized by local agencies, at least once every two years. As part of the on-site review, the State agency must evaluate all aspects of program administration, including certification procedures, nutrition education, civil rights compliance, food storage practices, inventory controls, and financial management systems. In addition to conducting on-site reviews, the State agency must evaluate program administration on an ongoing basis by reviewing financial reports, audit reports, food orders, inventory reports, and other relevant information.
( b ) *What must the State agency do if it finds that a local agency is deficient in a particular area of program administration?* The State agency must record all deficiencies identified during the review and institute follow-up procedures to ensure that local agencies and subdistributing agencies correct all deficiencies within a reasonable period of time. To ensure improved program performance in the future, the State agency may require that local agencies adopt specific review procedures for use in reviewing their own operations and those of subsidiaries or contractors. The State agency must provide copies of review reports to FNS upon request.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0584-0293)
Editorial Note on Part 1942
Editorial Notes: Nomenclature changes to part 1942 appear at 80 FR 9878, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1942.119 Professional services and borrower contracts. ( a ) Loans under this subpart are subject to the provisions of § 1942.17 (l) of subpart A of this part 1942.
( b ) The District Director will, with assistance as necessary by the State Director and OGC, concur in agreements between borrowers and third parties such as contracts for professional and technical services. The State Director may require State Office review of such documents in accordance with § 1942.108 (g) of this subpart. State Directors are expected to work closely with representatives of engineering and architectural societies, bar associations, commercial lenders, accountant associations, and others in developing standard forms of agreements, where needed, and other matters to expedite application processing, minimize referrals to OGC, and resolve problems which may arise. Standard forms should be reviewed by and approved by OGC.
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Barge Line Company (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark R. Holden, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operations ofthe Company.     /s/ Mark R. HoldenNovember10, 2005 Mark R. Holden  President and Chief Executive Officer
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAnalysis of sequencing and scheduling methods for arrival trafficThe air traffic control subsystem that performs scheduling is discussed. The function of the scheduling algorithms is to plan automatically the most efficient landing order and to assign optimally spaced landing times to all arrivals. Several important scheduling algorithms are described and the statistical performance of the scheduling algorithms is examined. Scheduling brings order to an arrival sequence for aircraft. First-come-first-served scheduling (FCFS) establishes a fair order, based on estimated times of arrival, and determines proper separations. Because of the randomness of the traffic, gaps will remain in the scheduled sequence of aircraft. These gaps are filled, or partially filled, by time-advancing the leading aircraft after a gap while still preserving the FCFS order. Tightly scheduled groups of aircraft remain with a mix of heavy and large aircraft. Separation requirements differ for different types of aircraft trailing each other. Advantage is taken of this fact through mild reordering of the traffic, thus shortening the groups and reducing average delays. Actual delays for different samples with the same statistical parameters vary widely, especially for heavy traffic.Document ID19900014057Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsNeuman, Frank*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Erzberger, Heinz*(NASA Ames Research Center Moffett Field, CA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateApril 1, 1990Subject CategoryAir Transportation And SafetyReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-102795NAS 1.15:102795A-90086Accession Number90N23373Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-67-21Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900014057.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 29.1079 Variegated (K).

Any tobacco that does not blend with the normal colors of the types; any leaf of which 20 percent or more of its surface is grayish, mottled, bleached, doty-faced, scalded, or sunbaked. (See Rule 15.)

[42 FR 21092, Apr. 25, 1977. Redesignated at 47 FR 51721, Nov. 17, 1982, 48 FR 29671, June 28, 1983, 49 FR 16756, Apr. 20, 1984, and 51 FR 25027, July 10, 1986]
Editorial Note on Subchapter C of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter C appear by Amdt. 381, 65 FR 64586, Oct. 30, 2000.

Editorial Note on Part 272
Editorial Note: OMB control numbers relating to this part 272 are contained in § 271.8.

§ 272.12 Computer matching requirements. ( a ) *General purpose.* The Computer Matching and Privacy Protection Act (CMA) of 1988, as amended, addresses the use of information from computer matching programs that involve a Federal System of Records. Each State agency participating in a computer matching program shall adhere to the provisions of the CMA if it uses an FNS system of records for the following purposes: ( 1 ) Establishing or verifying initial or continuing eligibility for Federal Benefit Programs;
( 2 ) Verifying compliance with either statutory or regulatory requirements of the Federal Benefit Programs; or
( 3 ) Recouping payments or delinquent debts under such Federal Benefit Programs.
( b ) *Matching agreements.* State agencies must enter into written agreements with USDA/FNS, consistent with 5 U.S.C. 552a(o) of the CMA, in order to participate in a matching program involving a USDA/FNS Federal system of records.
( c ) *Use of computer matching information.* ( 1 ) A State agency shall not take any adverse action to terminate, deny, suspend, or reduce benefits to an applicant or recipient based on information produced by a Federal computer matching program that is subject to the requirements of the CMA, unless: ( i ) The information has been independently verified by the State agency (in accordance with the independent verification requirements set out in the State agency's written agreement as required by paragraph (b) of this section) and a Notice of Adverse Action or Notice of Denial has been sent to the household, in accordance with § 273.2(f); or
( ii ) The Federal agency's Data Integrity Board has waived the two-step independent verification and notice requirement and notice of adverse action has been sent to the household, in accordance with § 273.2(f) of this chapter.
( 2 ) A State agency which receives a request for verification from another State agency, or from FNS pursuant to the provisions of § 273.16(i) of this chapter shall, within 20 working days of receipt, respond to the request by providing necessary verification (including copies of appropriate documentation and any statement that an individual has asked to be included in their file).
[77 FR 48055, Aug. 13, 2012]
Exhibit
32.1

Section 1350
Certifications

Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), Joseph V. Vumbacco and
Robert E. Farnham, the President and Chief Executive Officer and Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Health Management
Associates, Inc., certify that (i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended September 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information
contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Health Management Associates,
Inc.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Health Management Associates, Inc. and will be retained by Health
Management Associates, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

|                       | 
|---------------------- | 
|Date: December 3, 2003 | 

|                       | 
|---------------------- | 
|Date: December 3, 2003 | 

72
#### In the Matter of Brookrock Realty Corp., Appellant, v. Frederic S. Berman, as City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator, Respondent.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated November 28, 1967, affirmed, without costs. *(Matter of Morina*v. *Berman,*31 A D 2d 630.) Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

GEROME LUIS RANDAULPH,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO.: 4:20cv22-MW/MJF

LEON COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE

and

KAREN BODIFORD,

Defendants.

_________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On August 26, 2020, the Magistrate entered a report and recommendation 

recommending that Plaintiff’s Complaint be dismissed for failure to state a claim. 

ECF No. 10. Plaintiff then filed a notice of appeal. ECF No. 11. This Court then 

entered an order on Plaintiff’s notice of appeal. ECF No. 13. In that order, this Court 

noted that the Magistrate’s report and recommendation was a non-final order and 

was not subject to appeal. Further, this Court noted that the deadline to file objections 

to the Magistrate’s report and recommendation had run. Still, this Court gave 

Plaintiff until October 26, 2020 to file objections. Plaintiff has filed no objections. 

This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate’s report and 

recommendation, ECF No. 10. 

Accordingly, 

Case 4:20-cv-00022-MW-MJF Document 14 Filed 10/27/20 Page 1 of 2
2

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The report and recommendation, ECF No. 10, is ACCEPTED and 

ADOPTED as this Court’s opinion. 

2. The Clerk must enter judgment stating “This action is dismissed without 

prejudice for failure state a claim upon which relief can be granted.” 

3. The Clerk must close the file. 

SO ORDERED on October 27, 2020.

s/Mark E. Walker 

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00022-MW-MJF Document 14 Filed 10/27/20 Page 2 of 2
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Notes:

1. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 83 FR 22178, May 14, 2018.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 83 FR 61310, Nov. 29, 2018

3. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 85 FR 65504, Oct. 15, 2020.

4. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 87 FR 44266, July 26, 2022.

###### Editorial Note on Subpart F of Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subpart F of part 2 appear at 60 FR 66713, Dec. 26, 1995.

#### § 2.40 Deputy Under Secretary for Farm Production and Conservation.

Pursuant to § 2.16(a), subject to reservations in § 2.16(b), and subject to policy guidance and direction by the Under Secretary, the following delegation of authority is made to the Deputy Under Secretary for Farm Production and Conservation, to be exercised only during the absence or unavailability of the Under Secretary: Perform all the duties and exercise all the powers which are now or which may hereafter be delegated to the Under Secretary for Farm Production and Conservation: Provided, that this authority shall be exercised by the respective Deputy Under Secretary in the order in which he or she has taken office as a Deputy Under Secretary.

[83 FR 22184, May 14, 2018]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCTS

Case No. 3:19md2885

LIABILITY LITIGATION

This Document Relates to: 

Adkins, 7:20cv012

Judge M. Casey Rodgers

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones

DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS ORDER NO. 3

This Order addresses Plaintiff’s objections and counter-designations to 

Defendants’ affirmative deposition designations and Defendants’ objections to 

Plaintiff’s counter-designations thereto for the following witness depositions:

1. Jose Manuel (11/3/2020)

2. John Merkley (2/26/2020)

3. Dan Ohama (11/17/2020)

4. Mark Van Densen (12/4/2020)

5. Xiaotian Yan (11/4/2020)

SO ORDERED this 14th day of September, 2021.

M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 7:20-cv-00012-MCR-GRJ Document 90 Filed 09/14/21 Page 1 of 1
PUBLIC LAW 109–201—MAR. 20, 2006 120 STAT. 309

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4152 (S. 2036):

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):

Feb. 14, considered and passed House.

Mar. 3, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–201

109th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 320 High

Street in Clinton, Massachusetts, as the ‘‘Raymond J. Salmon Post Office’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

320 High Street in Clinton, Massachusetts, shall be known and

designated as the ‘‘Raymond J. Salmon Post Office’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Raymond

J. Salmon Post Office’’.

Approved March 20, 2006.

Mar. 20, 2006

[H.R. 4152]