alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. Case Nos. 3:96cr80/LAC/CJK

3:15cv220/LAC/CJK

STEVEN ANTHONY GRAHAM

_____________________________/

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated May 13, 2015 (doc. 309). Defendant has been furnished a copy of the

Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to

Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of the timely

filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and the objections thereto timely filed,

I have determined that the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by

reference in this order.

2. Defendant’s motion to vacate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (doc. 308) is 

Case 3:96-cr-00080-LC-CJK Document 311 Filed 06/15/15 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

SUMMARILYDISMISSED, as this court lacks jurisdiction to consider a successive motion absent

authorization from the Eleventh Circuit.

3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED this 15 day of June, 2015. th

s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case Nos. 3:96cr80/LAC/CJK; 3:15cv220/LAC/CJK

Case 3:96-cr-00080-LC-CJK Document 311 Filed 06/15/15 Page 2 of 2
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:94cr3028 LAC

CRAIG FLEMING

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on APRIL 4, 2008 

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION FOR REDUCTION OF SENTENCE PURSUANT TO TITLE 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) 

Filed by DEFENDANT PRO SE on 4/3/2008 Doc.# 316

RESPONSES:

on Doc.#

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Mary Maloy

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 17

th day of

June, 2008, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) The defendant is serving a statutory mandatory minimum term or Life

imprisonment. Even if the underlying guideline range were reduced, his guideline

sentence remains at Life. Also, the facts reflect the offense conduct involved

well in excess of 4.5 kilograms of cocaine base. 

 s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 3:94-cr-03028-LC-SMN Document 317 Filed 06/17/08 Page 1 of 1
* Pursua nt to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED

February 23, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40474 Summary Calendar

IN THE MATTER OF: MARGARET FRATILA, C/O MARGARET’S GREENHOUSE & EUROPEAN FLORAL DESIGN, M.G. & E.D., L.L.C.,

Debtor,

MARGARET FRATILA, C/O MARGARET’S GREENHOUSE & EUROPEAN FLORAL DESIGN, M.G. & E.D., L.L.C.,

Appellant,

versus

MIKE BOUDLOCHE, TRUSTEE,

Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

(2:04-CV-503)

--------------------

Before KING, WIENER, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM: *

Appellant Margaret Fratila is a Bankruptcy Chapter 7 debtor

who appeals the Bankruptcy Court’s refusal to remove the bankruptcy

trustee, based on Fratila’s dissatisfaction with various specifiedacts of the trustee. On appeal to the district court, the ruling

of the Bankruptcy Court was affirmed. We too affirm.

Our careful review of the record on appeal, including the

briefs of th e parties, and our analysis of the full and legally

correct opinion of the district court on appeal of the Bankruptcy

Court’s decision, convinces us beyond cavil that the acts of the

trustee complained of by Fratila were consistent with or required

by law or were taken pursuant to the Bankruptcy Court’s orders.

Inasmuch as the district court correctly disposed of the debtor’s

complaints against the trustee, and well and fully explai ned the

reasons for so doing, no useful purpose would be served by our

reiterating the facts and applicable law. Rather, for the reasons

set forth in the careful and complete opinion of the district

court, the rulings of the Bankruptcy Court from which the debtor

appeals are

AFFIRMED.
OtPARTMEMTOF 

V .V. 

^H>\jNSPORWteti--

r/CKETOPERMiONS 

II: I. ..•!.• airport 

GhamBer 

Chamber ot Convnsice of SL Joseph County 

advancing regional 

economic prosperity 

ill jiOOCT -U AS : 25 . 

August 25, 2010 

Secretary Ray LaHood 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

DOT-OFT-2010-0124 

RE: Support of the South Bend Regional Airport Application for Funding Under the Department 

of Transportation Small Community Air Service Development Program 

Dear Mr. Secretary, 

On behalf of The Chamber of Commerce of St. Joseph County, our 1,200 member businesses and 

the 96,000 employees they represent, I would like to express our enthusiastic support for the 

Small Community Air Service Development Grant application submitted by the St. Joseph 

County Airport Authority for marketing ftinding to encourage a new carrier to enter the South 

Bend market with non-stop service to Denver, CO. 

Business and personal travel costs are considered carefully, and affordable fares from the South 

Bend Regional Airport are important to everyone. A flight to Denver on a low cost airline has the 

potential to deliver great value to this region. The proposed service to Denver International 

Airport offers an important business destination from SBN and more importantly provides the 

Micbiana region with an access point to other strategic westbound destinations. There is 

presently no low-cost way to fly west from the South Bend Regional Airport. 

The Chamber of Commerce of St. Joseph County is committed to using this new service 

whenever possible. Because Tlie South Bend Regional Airport is close, lines are shorter and 

parking is affordable, we are inclined to use it rather than driving to a distant airport. We want to 

see a nonstop flight to Denver, CO from our local airport, and we are committed to this new 

ser\ice to succeed and we will help to support it in any way we can. 

We urge you to fiilly fund the request from South Bend Regional Airport for a Small Community 

Air Service Development Grant. Thank you for your consideration. 

Sincerely, 

Paul R. Laskowski 

Interim President and CEO 

•iThe^CqmmercBqentera/iblE;"(Colfax;A%^. S^ 

South Bend Regional Aiipoil, South Bend, Indiana 

Small Community Air Service Development Program Proposal 2010 

48
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Steven J. MalcolmSteven J. MalcolmChief Executive Officer of Williams Partners GP LLC,
general partner of Williams Partners L.P.
(Principal Executive Officer)
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 201 2

- NM

- 1 5 6

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
Exhibit 32.1**Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906**In connection with the quarterly report of Orchids Paper Products Company (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael P. Sage, Chief Executive Officer and President of theCompany, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and Section 1350 ofChapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.         By:                                              /s/ Michael P. Sage    Michael P. Sage  August 4, 2006  Chief Executive Officer and President
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2210 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2210

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand the eligibility of 
 children of certain deceased veterans to educational assistance under 
   the Post-9/11 Educational Assistance Program of the Department of 
                           Veterans Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 23, 2013

Mr. Young of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand the eligibility of 
 children of certain deceased veterans to educational assistance under 
   the Post-9/11 Educational Assistance Program of the Department of 
                           Veterans Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Marine Gunnery Sergeant John David 
Fry Scholarship Improvements Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. ENTITLEMENT OF CHILDREN OF CERTAIN DECEASED VETERANS TO 
              EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE UNDER THE POST-9/11 EDUCATIONAL 
              ASSISTANCE PROGRAM OF THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    (a) In General.--Section 3311(b)(9) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``2001, dies in line of duty while serving 
        on active duty as a member of the Armed Forces.'' and inserting 
        ``2001--''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraphs:
                    ``(A) dies in line of duty while serving on active 
                duty as a member of the Armed Forces; or
                    ``(B) is awarded the Purple Heart for an injury and 
                dies as a result of that injury during the 60-day 
                period beginning on the date of the person's discharge 
                or release from active duty service in the Armed 
                Forces.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to a person who dies on or after September 11, 2001.
                                 <all>
```
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter C of Chapter II

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subchapter C appear by Amdt. 381, 65 FR 64586, Oct. 30, 2000.

###### Editorial Note on Part 278

#### Editorial Note:

OMB control numbers relating to this part 278 are contained in § 271.8.

#### § 278.10 [Reserved]
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PANAMA CITY DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. Case No. 5:20-cr-10-MEW

ULISES PEREZ

a/k/a “Erick Sanchez-Adams”

MATTHEW SHAVERS

and

FREDDIE KNOWLES, III

 /

NOTICE OF COMPLETED ADMINISTRATIVE FORFEITURE

On February 18, 2020, defendants, Ulises Perez, Matthew Shavers, and 

Freddie Knowles, III, were indicted in a five-count Indictment. (ECF Doc. 7). 

Included in the Indictment were a Winchester 12 gauge shotgun, a Remington 12 

gauge shotgun, a Rogue .22 caliber rifle, a Glock .40 pistol, a Raven Arms .25 

caliber pistol, a Taurus 9mm pistol, a Savage 30-06 caliber rifle, and a New 

England Firearms 20 gauge shotgun. 

At this time, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives has 

completed the administrative forfeiture of the firearms listed in the Indictment and 

no judicial forfeiture proceedings are necessary in the above- criminal matter.
2

Dated this 5th day of October, 2021.

Respectfully submitted,

JASON R. COODY

Acting United States Attorney

/s/Michelle Spaven

MICHELLE SPAVEN

Assistant United States Attorney

Florida Bar No.: 0640761

Northern District of Florida

30 West Government Street

Panama City, FL 32401

(850) 785-3495
|  |  |  |  |  |
|--|--|--|--|--|
|  |  |  |  |

What's NewBookmark this page for the most recentEOWS postings, including additions to the conferencecalendar and notifications of funding solicitations.  If you seethings that you like, need improvement, or think should be included onthe Web site, you can reach us at [email protected]. *AnUpdate on GMS*  ShowMe the Funding!** **EOWSPublicationsWeeders andSeeders...you can apply for the following funding **today**!
**CapacityBuilding for Community****Developmentand Affordable Housing** (HUD) Deadline March31, 2001
**PregnancyRisk Assessment Monitoring Systems** (HHS) DeadlineJanuary 12, 2000
**DrugPrevention Models on College Campuses Grant Competition**(ED)DeadlineDecember 13, 2001
**FY 2001Brownfields Cleanup Revolving Loan Fund Pilots** (EPA) DeadlineDec. 18, 2000
Learn more about**AfterSchool Resource Fairs**! They're fun! They're easy! It's a collaborativeeffort that brings the entire AFTER-SCHOOL COMMUNITY together!! 
**Tips On Applyingfor Federal Grants**
**Visit the EOWS Funding Resources Web page**
#### § 2710.5 Appeals.

*Procedure.* Any person whose initial request is denied in whole or in part may appeal that denial, in accordance with 7 CFR 1.3(e) and 1.7, to the Director, Office of Information Resources Management, by sending the appeal to the Information Access and Disclosure Officer, Office of Information Resources Management, USDA, 14th and Independence Ave., SW., Room 407-W, Washington, DC 20250. The Director, Office of Information Resources Management, will make the determination on the appeal.
EX-32
           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF JOHN FLEMING

                  SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the annual report of City Capital Corporation
("Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that to his knowledge:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

Dated: May 14, 2009                    By: /s/  Ephren W. Taylor II
                                       Ephren W. Taylor II,
                                       Chief Executive Officer (principal
                                       financial and accounting officer)
Appendix H

Responses to Comments

(will be submitted after public hearing)
Page 1 of 2

1

See Edwards v. United States, 114 F.3d 1083 (11TH Cir. 1997) (district courts must treat notices of

appeal in Section 2255 actions as applications for certificates of appealability).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs. 3:94cr3136/RV

BENNIE CLEVELAND WILLIAMS

ORDER

The defendant has filed a notice of appeal (doc. 334) which this court construes as

a request for a certificate of appealability.1 Defendant appeals the court’s denial of his

motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). (Doc. 333). Unless a certificate of appealability

is issued, the defendant may not take an appeal from the final order denying Section 2255

relief, or relief pursuant to Rule 60(b). See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(1)(B); Gonzalez v. Secretary

of Department of Corrections, 317 F.3d 1308, 1312 (11th Cir. 2003). It does not appear that

a certificate of appealability is required under the circumstances in this case where a

defendant seeks to appeal the denial of a motion pursuant to § 3582 that was not

construed as a § 2255 motion. See United States v. Hernandez, 2004 WL 1147258, *1

(4th Cir. 2004) (finding no certificate of appealability required, citing 28 U.S.C. §

2253(c)(1)(B)); Lowe v. United States, 2007 WL 41951, *1 (M.D.Ga. 2007) (same); United

States v. Robinson, 2006 WL 2350016, *2 (E.D.Tex.,2006) (same); U.S. v. CamarilloHernandez, 2003 WL 1529582, *1 (5th Cir. 2003) (reviewing merits of § 3582 appeal

without certificate of appealability); United States v. Lindsey, 3 Fed.Appx. 116-117, ,**1

(4th Cir. 2001) (same); compare United States v. Walters ,213 Fed.Appx. 190, *191, 2007

WL 136694, **1 (4th Cir. 2007); United States v. Crawford , 2007 WL 1745876, *1 (11th

Case 3:94-cr-03136-RV-CJK Document 340 Filed 10/03/07 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 3:96cr57/RV; 3:03cv2/RV/MD

Cir. 2007); United States v. Perez, 197 Fed.Appx. 895, *896, 2006 WL 2805648, **1 (11th

Cir. 2006); United States v. Jackson, 187 Fed.Appx. 381, 2006 WL 1824839, **1 (5th Cir.

2006); United States v. Miller, 116 Fed. Appx 457 (4th Cir. 2004). To the extent one would

be required, the court finds that defendant has not made a substantial showing of a denial

of a constitutional right for the reasons stated in the court’s order denying his original

motion. (Doc. 333). Thus, his request for a certificate of appealability will be denied.

Defendant has not filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The court

finds that the appeal is not taken in good faith and he is not otherwise entitled to so

proceed. Fed.R.App.P. 24(a)(3). Defendant shall therefore pay the $455.00 filing fee

within thirty days.

DONE AND ORDERED this 3rd day of October, 2007.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:94-cr-03136-RV-CJK Document 340 Filed 10/03/07 Page 2 of 2
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v George Santana, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered July 29, 1976, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, and new trial ordered. The cumulative effect of several errors committed at defendant’s trial rendered that trial unfair. To begin with, during the course of the one-day trial, the court asked the witnesses approximately 300 questions from the Bench, including 64% of the questions posed to the complaining witness on direct examination. Neither the prosecutor nor defense counsel demonstrated a need for such unnecessarily extensive assistance on the part of the trial court. Although none of the court’s questions were unnecessarily prejudicial to defendant, we are compelled to conclude that the conduct of the trial court constituted error, in light of repeated pronouncements by the Court of Appeals that the trial court’s prerogative to join in the examination of witnesses should be exercised sparingly (see *People v Jamison,*47 NY2d 882) and only when *978necessary to aid the jury in understanding the factual issues presented (see *People v Mendes,*3 NY2d 120; *People v Mees,*47 NY2d 997). It was also error for the trial court to inform the prospective jurors, during *voir dire,*concerning the nature and function of the Grand Jury (see *People v Crossman,*69 AD2d 887). Finally, it was improper for the court to elicit testimony with respect to defendant’s silence at the time of his arrest (see *Doyle v Ohio,*426 US 610; *People v Conyers,*49 NY2d 174). While, under the circumstances of the case, any one of these errors, standing alone, might not have been of sufficient gravity to mandate a reversal, we believe that their cumulative effect was to deprive defendant of his right to a fair trial. Hopkins, J. P., Mangano, Rabin and Gulotta, JJ., concur.
### Major Components of Flow in the Republican River During Drought Conditions from Near Hardy, Nebraska, to Concordia, Kansas

By: Cristi V. Hansen

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/fs23496

#### Links

- More information:  **Publisher Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.