alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 27.97 Ascertaining the accuracy of price quotations. The buyers and sellers of cotton in each spot market shall be responsible for providing accurate and timely price, quality, and volume of purchases data by growth area to the Cotton Division. The Cotton Division is responsible for ascertaining the accuracy of the price quotations in each designated spot market. The Cotton Division will carry out this responsibility by performing the following duties and functions: ( a ) The Cotton Division will collect and analyze pertinent information on the prices and values of spot cotton from each spot market.
( b ) In the process of determining price quotations, the Cotton Division will contact a minimum of three buyers and sellers of cotton in each bona fide market at least two times per week during the active trading season and one time per week during the remainder of the year to obtain information on prices, qualities, volume, and terms of sales in sufficient detail to determine quotations.
( c ) The Cotton Division will summarize the price and quality data and, based on analysis of this summary, make determinations regarding quotations of price, value and differences.
( d ) Quotations for each spot market shall be reviewed and approved by the Cotton Division's Market News Branch Chief or Assistant Branch Chief prior to publication.
( e ) The Cotton Division will publish the appropriate quotations by bale volume for grades, staple lengths, micronaire determinations, and other quality factors for each spot market on a daily basis.
(The information collection requirements contained in this section were approved by the Office of Management and Budget under OMB control number 0581-0029) [53 FR 29327, Aug. 4, 1988]
§ 249.8 Level of benefits and eligible foods. ( a ) *General.* State agencies must identify in the State Plan the fresh, nutritious, unprepared, locally grown fruits, vegetables, honey, and herbs that are eligible for purchase under the SFMNP. Eligible foods may not be processed or prepared beyond their natural state except for usual harvesting and cleaning processes. Dried fruits or vegetables, such as prunes (dried plums), raisins (dried grapes), sun-dried tomatoes, or dried chili peppers are not considered eligible foods in the SFMNP. Potted fruit or vegetable plants, potted or dried herbs, wild rice, nuts of any kind (even raw), maple syrup, cider, seeds, eggs, meat, cheese, and seafood are also not eligible for purposes of the SFMNP. “Locally grown” means produce grown only within a State's borders but may be defined by State agencies to include border areas in adjacent States. Under no circumstances may produce grown outside of the United States and its territories be considered eligible food.
( b ) *The value of the Federal benefits received.* ( 1 ) The Federal SFMNP benefit level received by each participant, whether individual or household, may not be less than $20 per year or more than $50 per year, except that: ( i ) A State agency that operated the SFMNP in FY 2006 may continue to issue the same level of benefits that was provided to participants in FY 2006, even if the benefit level was less than $20;
( ii ) Participants served by a State agency that operated the SFMNP through a CSA program model in FY 2006 may, at the State agency's discretion, continue to receive the same CSA benefit levels that were provided to such participants in FY 2006, subject to the conditions set forth at § 249.14(e)(3), Distribution of Funds; and
( iii ) Participants who are participating in the SFMNP through a CSA program may receive a higher total benefit level than participants participating in a check or coupon program model, as long as that level is consistent for all Senior CSA program participants and does not exceed the $50 annual maximum per individual or household, except as provided in paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
( 2 ) The total value of SFMNP benefits provided in a combination of program models, such as coupons/checks and bulk purchase, may not exceed the $50 maximum benefit level set forth in paragraph 249.8(b)(1).
( c ) *Participant or household benefit allocation.* ( 1 ) All SFMNP participants living in the areas served by the State agency must be offered the same amount of SFMNP benefits, regardless of the program model(s) used by that State agency.
( 2 ) Benefits may be allocated on an individual or on a household basis.
( 3 ) Foods provided are intended for the sole benefit of SFMNP participants and are not meant to be shared with other non-participating household members.
( 4 ) Participants must receive SFMNP benefits free of charge.
[71 FR 74630, Dec. 12, 2006, as amended at 74 FR 48374, Sept. 23, 2009]
#### § 29.1080 Variegated dark red (KD).

A dark brownish-red discoloration which usually results from excessive sunbaking during the growing process or from storing cured tobacco over extended periods of time. Any leaf of which 20 percent or more of its surface is dark brownish-red may be described as variegated dark red.

[48 FR 29671, June 28, 1983. Redesignated at 49 FR 16756, Apr. 20, 1984 and 51 FR 25027, July 10, 1986]
§ 2610.4 Requests for service. ( a ) Heads of USDA agencies will direct requests for audit or investigative service to the AIG/A, AIG/I, Audit Director, SAC, or to other OIG audit or investigation officials responsible for providing service of the type desired in the geographical area where service is desired.
( b ) Agency officials or other employees may, at any time, direct to the personal attention of the IG any audit or investigation matter that warrants such attention.
( c ) Other persons (*i.e.,* non-USDA personnel) may address their communications regarding audit or investigative matters to: The Inspector General, U.S. Department of Agriculture, USDA Stop 2301, Washington, DC 20250.
( d ) OIG has established several channels for USDA employees and the general public to report fraud, waste, abuse, and mismanagement in USDA programs, or misconduct by a USDA employee. These include a general OIG Hotline, a Bribery/Assault Line, and (for USDA employees) a Whistleblower Ombudsman. ( 1 ) General fraud, waste, and abuse hotline: ( i ) File complaint online: *http://www.usda.gov/oig/hotline.htm* (click on “Submit a Complaint” button);
( ii ) Telephone: (800) 424-9121, (202) 690-1622, or (202) 690-1202 (Telecommunication Device for the Deaf);
( iii ) Facsimile: (202) 690-2474; or
( iv ) Write a letter to United States Department of Agriculture, Office of Inspector General, P.O. Box 23399, Washington, DC 20026.
( 2 ) Bribery/Assault Line: (202) 720-7257 (24 hours a day).
( 3 ) Whistleblower Protection Ombudsman. USDA employees may contact the Ombudsman via email at: *OIGombudsman@oig.usda.gov*. Additional information about the Ombudsman is available online at *https://www.usda.gov/oig/ombudsman.htm*.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of CEO Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of KapStone Paper andPackaging Corporation for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Roger W. Stone,Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of KapStone Paper and PackagingCorporation, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complieswith the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation.

 

Dated: November 3, 2010

 
|   | By:    | /s/  Roger W. Stone                   |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   |   | Roger  W. Stone                       |
|   |   | Chairman  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
Three months endedMarch 31, 2010(Millions)Earnings:Income from continuing operations before income taxes
    
    $
    313Less: Equity earnings, excluding proportionate share from 50% owned
investees and unconsolidated majority-owned investees
    
    
    (26
    )Income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity earnings
    
    
    287Add:Fixed charges:Interest accrued, including proportionate share from 50% owned
investees and unconsolidated majority-owned investees
    
    
    83Rental expense representative of interest factor
    
    
    2Total fixed charges
    
    
    85Distributed income of equity-method investees, excluding
proportionate share from 50% owned investees and unconsolidated
majority-owned investees
    
    
    5Less:Capitalized interest
    
    
    (12
    )Total earnings as adjusted
    
    $
    365Fixed charges
    
    $
    85Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (a)
    
    
    4.29
 
 (a)
    
    As described in Note 1. of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, because the
entities acquired in the Dropdown were affiliates of Williams at the time of the acquisition, this
transaction is accounted for as a combination of entities under common control, similar to a
pooling of interests, whereby the assets and liabilities of the acquired entities are combined with
ours at their historical amounts. As a result, income from continuing operations before income
taxes shown above includes approximately $163 million of net income applicable to pre-partnership
operations, which is fully allocated to our general partner.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Section 906Certification**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), the undersignedofficer of Guaranty Bancorp (the “Company”) hereby certifies that theCompany’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

Dated: August 4,2010

 

 
|   | /s/ Paul  W. Taylor |
|--------|--------------------------|
|   | Name:                    | Paul W. Taylor |
|   | Title:                   | *Chief Financial  and Operating Officer and Secretary* |

 

The foregoing certification isbeing furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) and is not being filed as part of theReport or as a separate disclosure document.

 

1

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jerry Sowell, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered December 7, 1976, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, and robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, and new trial ordered. Due to the various errors committed at trial, it is necessary to reverse and order a new trial. First, one challenged portion of the charge is essentially identical to a charge held to be reversible error because the charge " 'in essence, instructed the jury that it could draw an inference of guilt if it disbelieved the testimony of the alibi witnesses’ ” (see *People v Perez,*54 AD2d 742; *People v Lee,*57 AD2d 905; *People v Lee,*51 AD2d 557). Second, the Assistant District Attorney made an attempt to impeach an alibi witness by demonstrating that the witness failed to inform law enforcement officials of the alibi testimony. Since no curative instructions were given by the court, explaining (1) that an alibi witness has no obligation to come forward or contact the police or the District Attorney, and (2) that the jury is to *609consider such testimony and give it such weight, it deems appropriate, if any, on the issue of credibility, this was reversible error (see *People v Clark,*64 AD2d 669). Lastly, the trial court erroneously instructed the jury to carefully scrutinize the alibi testimony, without similarly charging with respect to the identification testimony (see *People v Fludd,*68 AD2d 409). We have considered the other issues raised by defendant and find them to be without merit. Damiani, J. P., Titone, Mangano and Gulotta, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 12.1



CERTIFICATION

I, Wong Wah On Edward, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 20-F of China Natural Resources, Inc.; and

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



Date: June 15, 2020

/s/ Wong Wah On Edward

Wong Wah On Edward

Chief Executive Officer
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Notes: 1. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 83 FR 22178, May 14, 2018. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 83 FR 61310, Nov. 29, 2018 3. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 85 FR 65504, Oct. 15, 2020. 4. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 87 FR 44266, July 26, 2022.

§ 2.75 Director, Office of Pest Management Policy. ( a ) *Delegations.* Pursuant to § 2.29(a)(16), the following delegations of authority are made by the Chief Economist to the Director, Office of Pest Management Policy: ( 1 ) Coordinate USDA policy relative to the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, as amended (7 U.S.C. 136, *et seq.*) and coordinate the Department's Integrated Pest Management Programs and the Pesticide Assessment Program (7 U.S.C. 136-136y) (7 U.S.C. 7653).
( 2 ) Conduct a multiple crop and pesticide use survey as authorized by section 10109 of the Agricultural Improvement Act of 2018.
( b ) [Reserved]
[83 FR 61314, Nov. 29, 2018, as amended at 85 FR 65521, Oct. 15, 2020]
Editorial Note on Part 226
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 226 appear at 70 FR 43261, July 27, 2005.

§ 226.22 Procurement standards. ( a ) *General.* This section establishes standards and guidelines for the procurement of foods, supplies, equipment, and other goods and services. These standards are furnished to ensure that goods and services are obtained efficiently and economically and in compliance with the provisions of applicable Federal law and Executive orders.
( b ) *Compliance.* Institutions may use their own procedures for procurement with Program funds to the extent that: ( 1 ) Procurements by public institutions comply with applicable State or local laws and standards set forth in 2 CFR part 200, subpart D and USDA implementing regulations 2 CFR parts 400 and 415; and
( 2 ) Procurements by private nonprofit institutions comply with standards set forth in 2 CFR part 200, subpart D and USDA implementing regulations 2 CFR parts 400 and 415.
( c ) *Geographic preference.* ( 1 ) Institutions participating in the Program may apply a geographic preference when procuring unprocessed locally grown or locally raised agricultural products, including the use of “locally grown”, “locally raised”, or “locally caught” as procurement specifications or selection criteria for unprocessed or minimally processed food items. When utilizing the geographic preference to procure such products, the institution making the purchase has the discretion to determine the local area to which the geographic preference option will be applied so long as there are an appropriate number of qualified firms able to compete;
( 2 ) For the purpose of applying the optional geographic preference in paragraph (c)(1) of this section, “unprocessed locally grown or locally raised agricultural products” means only those agricultural products that retain their inherent character. The effects of the following food handling and preservation techniques will not be considered as changing an agricultural product into a product of a different kind or character: Cooling; refrigerating; freezing; size adjustment made by peeling, slicing, dicing, cutting, chopping, shucking, and grinding; forming ground products into patties without any additives or fillers; drying/dehydration; washing; packaging (such as placing eggs in cartons), vacuum packing and bagging (such as placing vegetables in bags or combining two or more types of vegetables or fruits in a single package); addition of ascorbic acid or other preservatives to prevent oxidation of produce; butchering livestock and poultry; cleaning fish; and the pasteurization of milk.
[88 FR 57857, Aug. 23, 2023, as amended at 89 FR 32092, Apr. 25, 2024]
#### § 29.1008 Combination symbols.

A color or group symbol used with another symbol to form the third factor of a grademark to denote a particular side or characteristic of the tobacco. As applied to flue-cured tobacco, the combination symbols are XL—lug side, PO—oxidized primings, XO—oxidized lugs or cutters, BO—oxidized leaf or smoking leaf, GL—thin-bodied nondescript, GF—medium-bodied nondescript, LP—lemon (primings side), and FP—orange (primings side), KK-excessively scorched.

[48 FR 29671, June 28, 1983, as amended at 51 FR 25027, July 10, 1986]
#### In the Matter of Margie Shrewsbury, Petitioner, v Thomas Publishing Company et al., Respondents.

Order, of the State Human Rights Appeal Board dated July 9, 1979, unanimously vacated, on the law, and the determination of the State Division of Human Rights that there was no probable cause that respondent Thomas Publishing Company had engaged in unlawful discriminatory practices is confirmed on the merits, without costs and without disbursements *(Matter of Callaghan v State Div. of Human Rights,*72 AD2d 679). No opinion. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Fein, Lupiano, Bloom and Carro, JJ.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

RAYMOND LATSON,

Plaintiff, 

vs. 1:03-CV-148-SPM/AK

NURSE HAGAN, et al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

AND DISMISSING CASE

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the magistrate judge's report

and recommendation (doc. 116) dated July 24, 2006. The parties have been

furnished a copy and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections. No

objections have been filed, although Plaintiff did file what he terms an “opinion”

as to the quality of care he received while incarcerated (doc. 117).

Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), I have

determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 116) is

Case 1:03-cv-00148-SPM-AK Document 118 Filed 08/10/06 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. The motion for summary judgment (doc. 82) is hereby granted.

3. This case is dismissed for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).

4. The clerk shall note on the docket that this case was dismissed

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

DONE AND ORDERED this tenth day of August, 2006.

 s/ Stephan P. Mickle 

Stephan P. Mickle

United States District Judge

Case 1:03-cv-00148-SPM-AK Document 118 Filed 08/10/06 Page 2 of 2
Editorial Note on Subchapter C of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter C appear by Amdt. 381, 65 FR 64586, Oct. 30, 2000.

Editorial Note on Part 275
Editorial Note: OMB control numbers relating to this part 275 are contained in § 271.8.

§ 275.4 Record retention. ( a ) The State agency shall maintain Performance Reporting System records to permit ready access to, and use of, these records. Performance Reporting System records include information used in data analysis and evaluation, corrective action plans, corrective action monitoring records in addition to ME review records and QC review records as explained in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section. To be readily accessible, system records shall be retained and filed in an orderly fashion. Precautions should be taken to ensure that these records are retained without loss or destruction for the 3-year period required by these regulations. Information obtained on individual households for Performance Reporting System purposes shall be safeguarded in accordance with FNS policies on disclosure of information for SNAP.
( b ) ME review records consist of thorough documentation of review findings, sources from which information was obtained, procedures used to review SNAP requirements including sampling techniques and lists, and ME review plans. The State agency must submit documented evidence of review findings to the FNS Regional Office upon request for purposes of evaluating State corrective action plans.
( c ) QC review records consist of Forms FNS-380, Worksheet for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, FNS-380-1, Quality Control Review Schedule, FNS-245, Negative Quality Control Review Schedule; other materials supporting the review decision, including all correspondence with the household and all case notes, digital or otherwise, taken or used by the eligibility worker that are applicable to the review period; sample lists; sampling frames; tabulation sheets; and reports of the results of all quality control reviews during each review period.
[Amdt. 160, 45 FR 15898, Mar. 11, 1980, as amended by Amdt. 260, 49 FR 6304, Feb. 17, 1984; Amdt. 262, 49 FR 50597, Dec. 31, 1984; 75 FR 33436, June 11, 2010; 86 FR 44586, Aug. 13, 2021]