alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1466.4 National priorities. ( a ) The national priorities in paragraphs (a)(1) through (8) of this section, consistent with statutory resources concerns, include soil quality, water quality and quantity, plants, energy, wildlife habitat, air quality, increased weather volatility, and related natural resource concerns, that may be used in EQIP implementation are: ( 1 ) Reductions of nonpoint source pollution, such as nutrients, sediment, pesticides, or excess salinity in impaired watersheds consistent with total maximum daily loads (TMDL) where available;
( 2 ) The reduction of ground and surface water contamination;
( 3 ) The reduction of contamination from agricultural sources, such as animal feeding operations;
( 4 ) Conservation of ground and surface water resources, including improvement of irrigation efficiency and increased resilience against drought and weather volatility;
( 5 ) Reduction of emissions, such as particulate matter, nitrogen oxides, volatile organic compounds, and ozone precursors and depleters that contribute to air quality impairment violations of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards;
( 6 ) Reduction in soil erosion and sedimentation from unacceptable levels and improvement of soil health on eligible land;
( 7 ) Promotion of at-risk species habitat conservation including development and improvement of wildlife habitat; and
( 8 ) Energy conservation to help save fuel, improve efficiency of water use, maintain production, and protect soil and water resources by more efficiently using fertilizers and pesticides.
( b ) In consultation with other Federal agencies and Indian Tribes, NRCS may undertake periodic reviews of the national priorities and the effects of program delivery at the State and local levels to adapt the program to address emerging resource issues. NRCS may— ( 1 ) Use the national priorities to guide the allocation of EQIP funds to the NRCS State offices;
( 2 ) Use the national priorities in conjunction with States, Indian Tribes, and local priorities to assist with prioritization and selection of EQIP applications; and
( 3 ) Periodically review and update the national priorities utilizing input from the public, Indian Tribes, other Federal and State agencies, and affected stakeholders to ensure that the program continues to address priority resource concerns.
[84 FR 69280, Dec. 17, 2019, as amended at 85 FR 67647, Oct. 26, 2020]
###### Editorial Note on Part 1955

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1955 appear at 80 FR 9895, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### §§ 1955.16-1955.17 [Reserved]
#### § 1735.50 Administrative findings.

The RE Act requires that the Administrator make certain findings to approve a telephone loan or loan guarantee. The borrower shall provide the evidence determined by the Administrator to be necessary to make these findings. Details on the information required to support these findings are included in 7 CFR part 1737.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jeffrey Moore, Appellant.

Judgment of the County Court, Westchester County, rendered May 17, 1978, affirmed. We note that no objection was made to the summations and no motion was made with respect to the record (see *People v Glass,*43 NY2d 283). Hopkins, J. P., Titone, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Caring for Every Child's Mental Health      

# Caring for Every Child's Mental Health

SAMHSA's "Caring for Every Child's Mental Health" public awareness effort was created in 1994 with the mission to increase awareness around children's mental health.

http://www.samhsa.gov/children/
§ 1709.121 Administrator's review and selection of grant awards. ( a ) The final decision to make an award is at the discretion of the Administrator. The Administrator shall make any selections of finalists for grant awards after consideration of the applications, the rankings, comments, and recommendations of the rating panel, and other pertinent information.
( b ) Based on consideration of the application materials, ranking panel ratings, comments, and recommendations, and other pertinent information, the Administrator may elect to award less than the full amount of grant requested by an applicant. Applicants will be notified of an offer of a reduced or partial award. If an applicant does not accept the Administrator's offer of a reduced or partial award, the Administrator may reject the application and offer an award to the next highest ranking project.
( c ) The projects selected by the Administrator will be funded in rank order to the extent of available funds.
( d ) In the event an insufficient number of eligible applications are received in response to a FOA and selected for funding to exhaust the funds available, the Administrator reserves the discretion to reopen the application period and to accept additional applications for consideration under the terms of the FOA. Another FOA regarding the reopening of an application period will be announced on *www.Grants.gov .*
[70 FR 5351, Feb. 2, 2005, as amended at 83 FR 45033, Sept. 5, 2018]
§ 1752.7 Civil rights and requirements. ( a ) *Equal opportunity and nondiscrimination.* The Agency will ensure that equal opportunity and nondiscriminatory requirements are met in accordance with the Equal Credit Opportunity Act and 7 CFR part 15. In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs).
( b ) *Civil rights compliance.* Recipients of Federal assistance under this part must comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Prior to determining eligibility of any servicing action under this part, the Agency will determine that the Borrower is in compliance with all civil rights requirements of the latest Civil Rights Compliance Review conducted by the Agency.
( c ) *Discrimination complaints.* Persons believing they have been subjected to discrimination prohibited by this section may file a complaint personally, or by an authorized representative with USDA, Director, Office of Adjudication, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250. A complaint must be filed no later than 180 days from the date of the alleged discrimination, unless the time for filing is extended by the designated officials of USDA or the Agency.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsThe materials processing research base of the Materials Processing CenterAn annual report of the research activities of the  Materials Processing Center of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology is given. Research on dielectrophoresis in the microgravity environment,  phase separation kinetics in immiscible liquids, transport properties of droplet clusters in gravity-free fields, probes and monitors for the study of solidification of molten semiconductors, fluid mechanics and mass transfer in melt crystal growth, and heat flow control and segregation in directional solidification are discussed.Document ID19890004300Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsLatanision, R. M.*(Massachusetts Inst. of Tech. Cambridge, MA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 5, 2013Publication DateSeptember 30, 1986Subject CategoryMaterials ProcessingReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:183016NASA-CR-183016Accession Number89N13671Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAGW-7645Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19890004300.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsIDRelationTitleN89-13672 through N89-13677Workvisibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

ELIE JEAN PIERRE,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 1:03-cv-00156-MP-AK

ITALIAN FOOD ENTERPRISES INC,

Defendant.

___________________________/

O R D E R 

This matter is before the Court on Doc. 23, Motion to Dismiss, doc. 22, Motion for

sanctions, and doc. 24, Motion to reopen plaintiff's deposition at plaintiff's expense. All three of

these motions are based on defendant's assertion that "Plaintiff’s testimony is so irrefutably false

that his complaint constitutes nothing less than a fraud upon the Court." Doc. 23, p. 7. As

plaintiff points out in his response, however, analysis of this statement requires extensive

examination of facts outside the pleadings and thus renders the matter inappropriate for a motion

to dismiss. Thus, the motions at doc. 22, 23 and 24 are denied, without prejudice to raising the

issues again at summary judgment.

DONE AND ORDERED this 22nd day of April, 2005

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:03-cv-00156-MP-AK Document 35 Filed 04/22/05 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Humboldt Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet in Eureka, California. The committee meeting is authorized under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination Act (Pub. L. 110-343) and in compliance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held December 7, 2010, from 5 p.m. to 7 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Six Rivers National Forest Office, 1330 Bayshore Way, Eureka, CA 95501.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Adam Dellinger, Committee Coordinator, at (707) 441-3569; e-mail                         *adellinger@fs.fed.us.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting is open to the public. The agenda includes: Reviewing the status of Title II project submissions, voting process for recommendation of project funding, and public comment period.

Dated: November 3, 2010.

Tyrone Kelley,

Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 2010-28598 Filed 11-12-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
§ 250.18 Reporting requirements. ( a ) *Inventory and distribution of donated foods.* The distributing agency must submit to FNS reports relating to the inventory and distribution of donated foods in this paragraph (a) or in other regulations applicable to specific programs. Such reports must be submitted in accordance with the timeframes established for each respective form. For donated foods received in FDPIR, the distributing agency must submit form FNS-152, *Monthly Distribution of Donated Foods to Family Units.* For donated foods received in TEFAP, NSLP, or other child nutrition programs, the distributing agency must submit form FNS-155, the *Inventory Management Register.*
( b ) *Processor performance.* Processors must submit performance reports and other supporting documentation, as required by the distributing agency or by FNS, in accordance with § 250.37(a), to ensure compliance with requirements in this part.
( c ) *Disasters and situations of distress.* The distributing agency must submit to FNS a report of the types and amounts of donated foods used from distributing or recipient agency storage facilities in disasters and situations of distress, and a request for replacement of such foods, using electronic form FNS-292A, *Report of Commodity Distribution for Disaster Relief,* in accordance with §§ 250.69 and 250.70. The report must be submitted within 45 days of the termination of such assistance.
( d ) *Other information.* The distributing agency must submit other information, as requested by FNS, in order to ensure compliance with requirements in this part. For example, FNS may require the distributing agency to submit information with respect to its assessment of the distribution charge, or to justify the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of its distribution system, in accordance with § 250.13(c) and (d).
[81 FR 23100, Apr. 19, 2016, as amended at 83 FR 18927, May 1, 2018]
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SS.1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of IR BioSciences Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
Wilhelm, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and
 
 2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  IR
      BIOSCIENCES HOLDINGS, INC.Date: March
      31, 2009
              By:
              /s/ Michael K.
      WilhelmMichael
      K. WilhelmPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, an other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
§ 2500.017 Confidentiality of proposals and awards. ( a ) *General.* Names of entities submitting proposals, as well as proposal contents and evaluations, except to those involved in the review process, will be kept confidential to the extent permissible by law.
( b ) *Identifying confidential and proprietary information in a proposal.* If a proposal contains proprietary information that constitutes a trade secret, proprietary commercial or financial information, confidential personal information, or data affecting the national security, it will be treated in confidence to the extent permitted by law, provided that the information is clearly marked by the applicant with the term “confidential and proprietary information.” In addition, the following statement must be included at the bottom of the project narrative or any other attachment included in the proposal that contains such information: “The following pages (specify) contain proprietary information which (name of proposing organization) requests not to be released to persons outside the Government, except for purposes of evaluation.”
( c ) *Disposition of proposals.* By law, OAO is required to make the final decisions as to whether the information is required to be kept in confidence. Information contained in unsuccessful proposals will remain the property of the applicant. However, the Department will retain for three years one file copy of each proposal received; extra copies will be destroyed. Public release of information from any proposal submitted will be subject to existing legal requirements. Any proposal that is funded will be considered an integral part of the award and normally will be made available to the public upon request, except for information designated proprietary by OAO.
( d ) *Submission of proprietary information.* The inclusion of proprietary information is discouraged unless it is necessary for the proper evaluation of the proposal. If proprietary information is to be included, it should be limited, set apart from other text on a separate page, and keyed to the text by numbers. It should be confined to a few critical technical items that, if disclosed, could jeopardize the obtaining of foreign or domestic patents. Trade secrets, salaries, or other information that could jeopardize commercial competitiveness should be similarly keyed and presented on a separate page. Proposals or reports that attempt to restrict dissemination of large amounts of information may be found unacceptable by OAO and constitute grounds for return of the proposal without further consideration. Without assuming any liability for inadvertent disclosure, OAO will limit dissemination of such information to its employees and, where necessary for the evaluation of the proposal, to outside reviewers on a confidential basis.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsComposite laminate tailoring with probabilistic constraints and loadsA reliability-based structural synthesis procedure was developed to tailor laminates to meet reliability-based (ply) strength requirements and achieve desirable laminate responses. The main thrust is to demonstrate how to integrate the optimization technique in the composite laminate tailoring process to meet reliability design requirements. The question of reliability arises in fiber composite analysis and design because of the inherent scatter that is observed in the constituent (fiber and matrix) material properties during experimentation. Symmetric and asymmetric composite laminates subject to mechanical loadings are considered as application examples. These application examples illustrate the effectiveness and ease with which reliability considerations can be integrated in the design optimization model for composite laminate tailoring.Document ID19900010822Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsThanedar, P. B.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Chamis, C. C.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1990Subject CategoryComposite MaterialsReport/Patent NumberNASA-TM-102515E-5182NAS 1.15:102515Meeting InformationMeeting: Energy Technology Conference and ExhibitionLocation: New Orleans, LACountry: United StatesStart Date: January 14, 1990End Date: January 18, 1990Sponsors:ASMEAccession Number90N20138Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-63-1BDistribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900010822.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. PD-0992-15

ANTWAIN MAURICE BURKS, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ORDER REGARDING REPRESENTATION

FORT BEND COUNTY

This order was delivered per curiam.

O R D E R

Appellant was convicted of tampering with evidence in cause number 12-DCR-061196 in

the 400th District Court of Fort Bend County. Appellant was sentenced to confinement for 16

years. The court of appeals affirmed the judgment of the trial court. Burks v. State, No. 14-14-

00166-CR (Tex. App. — Houston, delivered July 21, 2015). The Appellant’s Pro se petition for

discretionary review was granted by this Court on November 25, 2015. Appellant is entitled to

representation before this Court at this time. See Article 1.051(a)(d)(2), V.A.C.C.P. It appears that
BURKS -2

Appellant is without representation in this court. Accordingly, the trial court is ordered to determine

if Appellant is currently represented by counsel, and if so, to inform this court who represents

Appellant. If Appellant is not currently represented by counsel and desires counsel, the trial court

must first determine whether Appellant is indigent. If the trial court finds Appellant is indigent, that

court shall appoint an attorney to represent Appellant before this court in regard to PDR No. PD0992-15, in accord with the provisions of Articles 1.051 and 26.04, V.A.C.C.P. Any hearing

conducted pursuant to this order shall be held within 30 days of the date of this order. The trial

court's order appointing counsel, any findings of fact, affidavits, or transcription of the court

reporter's notes and any other supplementation of the record shall be returned to this court within 45

days of the date of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 25 DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2015 th

DO NOT PUBLISH