### 28275 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 97 / Thursday, May 20, 2010 / Notices

**RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES :** 

Individual practitioner notifications of intent to use Schedule III, IV, or V opioid drugs for the Maintenance and Detoxification Treatment of Opiate Addiction under 21 U.S.C. 823(g)(2).

**SYSTEM EXEMPTED FROM CERTAIN PROVISIONS**
**OF THE ACT :** 

None.

1 Published in the Federal Register, Vol. 67, No. 80, Thursday, April 25, 2002 (pages 20542–20544).

[FR Doc. 2010–12147 Filed 5–19–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4160–20–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY** 

**[Docket No. DHS–2010–0020]**

**Homeland Security Science and Technology Advisory Committee** 

**AGENCY :**  Science and Technology Directorate, DHS.

**ACTION :**  Committee Management; Notice of Closed Federal Advisory Committee Meeting.

**SUMMARY :**  On April 12, 2010, the Homeland Security Science and Technology Advisory Committee announced in the Federal Register that the Committee would meet on April 20– 22, 2010 in Frederick, MD. This notice supplements that original meeting notice.

**DATES :**  The Homeland Security Science and Technology Advisory Committee met on April 20, 2010 from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., April 21, 2010 from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. and on April 22, 2010 from 9:30 a.m. to 1 p.m.

**ADDRESSES :**  The meeting was held at the National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures Center, 110 Thomas Johnson Drive, Suite 400, Frederick, MD
21702.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Ms. Tiwanda Burse, Science and Technology Directorate, Department of Homeland Security, 245 Murray Lane, Bldg. 410, Washington, DC 20528, 202–
254–6877.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (Pub. L. 92–463).

The mission of the Homeland Security Science and Technology Advisory Committee is to provide a source of independent scientific and technical planning advice for the Under Secretary of Homeland Security for Science and Technology.

The Homeland Security Science and Technology Advisory Committee met for the purpose of receiving sensitive and classified (Secret-level) briefings and presentations regarding relationships between Science & Technology and selected National Biodefense Analysis and Countermeasures related topics, which are matters relevant to homeland security. The meeting was closed to the public.

The Federal Advisory Committee Act requires that notices of meetings of advisory committees be announced in the Federal Register 15 days prior to the meeting date. A notice of the meeting of the Homeland Security Science and Technology Advisory Committee was published in the Federal Register on April 12, 2010, 8 days prior to the meeting due to unavoidable delays in finalizing the agenda.

Dated: May 10, 2010. Ervin Kapos, Designated Federal Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010–12090 Filed 5–19–10; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 9110–9F–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY** 

**Coast Guard**

**[USCG–2010–0030]**

**Collection of Information Under Review by Office of Management and**  **Budget; OMB Control Number: 1625– 0086** 

**AGENCY :**  Coast Guard, DHS.

**ACTION :**  Thirty-day Notice requesting
comments.

**SUMMARY :**  In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this request for comments announces that the U.S. Coast Guard is forwarding an Information Collection Request (ICR), abstracted below, to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), Office of Management and Budget (OMB) requesting an extension of its approval for the following collection of information: 1625–0086, Great Lakes Pilotage, without change. Our ICR describes the information we seek to collect from the public. Review and comments by OIRA ensure we only impose paperwork burdens commensurate with our performance of duties.

**DATES :**  Please submit on or before June 21, 2010.

**ADDRESSES :**  You may submit comments identified by Coast Guard docket number [USCG–2010–0030] to the Docket Management Facility (DMF) at the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) or to OIRA. To avoid duplication, please submit your comments by only one of the following means:

(1) Electronic submission. (a) To Coast Guard docket at http:// www.regulation.gov. (b) To OIRA by email via: oira

_submission@omb.eop.gov.

(2) Mail or Hand delivery. (a) DMF (M–30), DOT, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590– 0001. Hand deliver between the hours of 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone number is 202–366–9329. (b) To OIRA, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503, attention Desk Officer for the Coast Guard.

(3) Fax. (a) To DMF, 202–493–2251. (b) To OIRA at 202–395–5806. To ensure your comments are received in a timely manner, mark the fax, attention Desk Officer for the Coast Guard.

The DMF maintains the public docket for this Notice. Comments and material received from the public, as well as documents mentioned in this Notice as being available in the docket, will become part of the docket and will be available for inspection or copying at room W12–140 on the West Building Ground Floor, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. You may also find the docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.

A copy of the ICR is available through the docket on the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov. Additionally, copies are available from: Commandant (CG–611): ATTN: Paperwork Reduction Act Manager, US Coast Guard, 2100 2nd St., SW., Stop 7101, Washington, DC
20593–7101.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Mr. Arthur Requina, Office of Information Management, telephone 202–475–3523, or fax 202–475–3929, for questions on these documents. Contact Ms. Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, 202–366–9826, for questions on the docket.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  The Coast Guard invites comments on whether this ICR should be granted based on it being necessary for the proper performance of Departmental functions. In particular, the Coast Guard would appreciate comments addressing: (1) The practical utility of the collections; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden of the collections; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of information subject to the collections; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the collections on respondents, including the use of automated