alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 14.1
                                                                    ------------

CODE OF ETHICS  APPLICABLE TO THE CHAIRMAN,  CHIEF EXECUTIVE  OFFICER AND SENIOR
FINANCIAL OFFICER



Blue Dolphin Energy Company ("Blue  Dolphin")  requires  ethical  conduct in the
practice of financial  management.  The Chairman,  Chief Executive Officer,  and
Senior  Financial  Officer each hold an important and elevated role in corporate
governance.  They are  uniquely  positioned  and  empowered  to ensure  that the
Company's,   and  its  stockholders',   interests  are  appropriately  balanced,
protected and preserved.  This code provides principles that these officers must
adhere to and advocate.

As the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer or Senior Financial Officer I will:

     o    Embody and enforce this Code of Ethics.

     o    Ensure that this Code of Ethics is  communicated  at least annually to
          all financial employees.

     o    Formally and promptly communicate any breach of this Code of Ethics to
          the Audit Committee.

     o    Act at all times with honesty,  integrity and  independence,  avoiding
          actual or apparent  conflicts of interest in personal and professional
          relationships.

     o    Discuss with the Audit  Committee,  in advance,  any transaction  that
          reasonably  could be expected to give rise to a conflict of  interest,
          or any transaction involving a related party.

     o    Provide  full,  fair,  accurate,   complete,   objective,  timely  and
          understandable  financial  disclosures in internal  reports as well as
          documents  filed or submitted to the Securities  Exchange  Commission,
          any other government agency or self-regulatory  organization,  or used
          in public communications.

     o    Comply with all applicable rules and regulations of federal, state and
          local  governments,  the Securities  Exchange  Commission,  the NASDAQ
          Small Cap Market and any other  exchanges on which the Company's stock
          is  listed,  and  other  appropriate  private  and  public  regulatory
          agencies.

     o    Comply with the Company's policies and procedures.


<PAGE>

     o    Act in good faith, responsibly, with due care, competence,  diligence,
          and without  knowingly  misrepresenting  material facts or allowing my
          better judgment to be subordinated.

     o    Protect and respect the confidentiality of information acquired in the
          course  of  my  work  except  when  authorized  or  otherwise  legally
          obligated to disclose. Confidential information acquired in the course
          of my work will not be used for personal advantage.

     o    Be recognized as a responsible partner among peers.

     o    Responsibly  use and control  assets and other  resources  employed or
          entrusted to my supervision.
29–008 

108TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 108–706 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTION 107, MAKING CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS 

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2005 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2004.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. LINDER, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 802] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 802, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of House Joint Resolution 107, making continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2005, 

and for other purposes, under a closed rule. The rule provides 1 

hour of debate in the House equally divided and controlled by the 

chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. 

The rule waives all points of order against consideration of the 

joint resolution. Finally, the rule provides one motion to recommit. 

Æ
#### Roselle State Bank, appellee, v. E. J. Basye et al., appellants.

Gen. No. 7,982.

*639Opinion filed October 15, 1929.

Rehearing denied February *4,*1930.

Samuel J. Howe, for certain appellant. Fischer & Fischer, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Jett

delivered the opinion of the court.
12/30/201 0 13:1 1 FA X202493514 2 FA A - >DM S g|001/00 6

U.S . DEPARTMEN TO F TRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O F HEARING S WASHINGTON , D.C . 

## f N TH E MATTE R O F FLIGHTSTA R AIRCRAF TSERVICES , INC.

FA ADOCKE TNO . CP10GL001 2 (Civi l PenaltyAction ) DM S NO . FAA-2010-107 6 FA ACAS E NO . no tcurrentl ydeterminabl e Administrativ e LawJudg e Richar d C . Goodwi n 

# DECEIVE D JIEARIN G tj">CKE T

O 

## 1 3 rn^ m 

# ag o C O 

## AGENC YMEMORANDU M O N VENU E No wCome s th e Agenc yi n accordanc e wit h th e Administrativ e La wJudge' s Procedura l Orde rDate d Novembe r30 , 2010 , an d state s th e following : Th e Responden t ha s requeste d tha t th e venu e fo rthi s cas e b e Jacksonville , Florida . Th e Agenc yha s n o objectio n t o tha t location . Th e Agenc yha s advise d Responden t tha t i t woul d fil e thi s a s a join trespons e t o th e Judge' s Order , bu t ha s bee n unabl e t o confir m wit h Responden ttha tthi s i s acceptable . Additionally , th e partie s ar e activel yinvolve d i n settlemen t negotiation s o n thi s case , whic h woul d obviat e th e nee d t o obtai n hearin g facilities . Th e Agenc ybelieve s suc h negotiation s shoul d b e resolve d withi n th e nex t 3 0 days , an d recognize s it s obligatio n t o giv e timel ynotic e t o th e Administrativ e La wJudg e i fthos e negotiation s bea rfruit . Fo rth e Agenc y Slen n L . Brow n Senio rAttorne y12/30/201 0 T3:1 1 FA X202493514 2 FA A * DMS @1002/00 G

CERTIFICAT E O F SERVIC E I hereb ycertifytha tth e foregoin g pleadin g ha s bee n maile d thi s dat e b yCertifie d Mail , Retur n Receip t Requested , ,to ; Qriqina l an d On e Copy : Hearin g Docke t Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S . W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attn ; Hearin g Docke tCler k AGC-430 , Wilbe rWrightBuildin g Suit e 2W100 0 On e Copy : Honorabl e Richard C . Goodwi n Administrativ e LawJudg e Offic e o fHearings , M-2 0 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenue , S.E . Eas tBuilding , Groun d Floor , Roo m E-12-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 Gregor yS . Winton , Esq , Th e Aviatio n LawFir m On e Researc h Court , Suit e 45 0 Rockville , M O 2085 0 Facsimil e 30 1 29 4 252 5 Date d thi s 16t h dayofDecember , 2010 . 

# m ^ YAliind B Quile s Lfega l Technicia n FA AGrea tLake s
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 223 (Friday, November 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 70970]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29153]



[[Page 70970]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

November 12, 2010.
    The Department of the Treasury will submit the following public 
information collection requirement(s) to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 on or 
after the date of publication of this notice. Copies of the 
submission(s) may be obtained by calling the Treasury Bureau Clearance 
Officer listed. Comments regarding this information collection should 
be addressed to the OMB reviewer listed and to the Treasury Department 
Clearance Officer, Department of the Treasury, Room 11000, 1750 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20220.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before December 20, 
2010 to be assured of consideration.

Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)

    OMB Number: 1506-0046.
    Type of Review: Extension without change to a currently approved 
collection.
    Title: Financial Crimes Enforcement Network; Anti-Money Laundering 
Programs; Special Due Diligence Programs for Certain Foreign Accounts.
    Abstract: The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network is renewing 
without change this Bank Secrecy Act regulation that implements section 
5318(i)(2) of title 31, United States Code, as added by section 312 of 
the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools 
Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT) Act of 2001 
(``Act''), which requires U.S. financial institutions to conduct 
enhanced due diligence with regard to correspondent accounts 
established, maintained, administered, or managed for certain types of 
foreign banks.
    Respondents: Businesses or other for-profits.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 56,326 hours.
    Bureau Clearance Officer: Russell Stephenson (202) 354-6012, 
Department of the Treasury, Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, P.O. 
Box 39, Vienna, VA 22183; (202) 354-6012.
    OMB Reviewer: Shagufta Ahmed, Office of Management and Budget, New 
Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503; (202) 395-
7873.

Celina Elphage,
Treasury PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-29153 Filed 11-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-02-P
#### In the Matter of John E. Casey, an Attorney, Respondent. Committee on Professional Standards, Third Judicial Department, Petitioner.

Respondent was admitted to the Bar by this court on October 18, 1954. Petitioner moves to confirm the report of the Hearing Judge which sustained two charges of professional misconduct consisting of neglect of a collection matter and failure to co-operate with petitioner in its investigation of an inquiry concerning the collection matter. The record supports the findings of the Hearing Judge and petitioner’s motion to confirm the report is granted. An attorney is obligated to co-operate with the committee charged with the responsibility of investigating complaints concerning his conduct. Indeed, "Full and forthright co-operation with the committee is essential to the proper performance of its function, and the withholding of such co-operation without cause must be judged a grave disservice to the public interest.” *(Matter of Hubscher,*25 AD2d 113, 114.) Here respondent, *665by his failure to promptly furnish petitioner with a written response to a relatively minor complaint, provoked the more serious charge of failure to co-operate. Under all the circumstances, we determine that respondent should be censured for his misconduct. Respondent censured. Mahoney, P. J., Sweeney, Kane, Staley, Jr., and Casey, JJ., concur.
| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|            /s/ Dr. Ralph S. Cunningham |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:                                                                                         | Dr. Ralph S. Cunningham |
| Title:                                                                                        | Chief Executive Officer of EPE Holdings, LLC |
|                                                                                          | the General Partner of Enterprise GP Holdings L.P. |
§ 1788.3 Flood insurance. ( a ) Borrowers shall purchase and maintain flood insurance for buildings in flood hazard areas to the extent available and required under the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended (42 U.S.C. 4001, *et seq.*) The insurance should cover, in addition to the building, any machinery, equipment, fixtures, and furnishings contained in the building.
( b ) The National Flood Insurance Program (see 44 CFR part 59 *et seq.*) provides for a standard flood insurance policy; however, other existing insurance policies which provide flood coverage may be used where flood insurance is available in lieu of the standard flood insurance policy. Such policies must be endorsed to provide: ( 1 ) That the insurer give 30 days written notice of cancellation or nonrenewal to the insured with respect to the flood insurance coverage. To be effective, such notice must be mailed to both the insured and RUS and other mortgagees if any and must include information as to the availability of flood insurance coverage under the National Flood Insurance Program, and
( 2 ) That the flood insurance coverage is at least as broad as the coverage offered by the Standard Flood Insurance Policy.
#### § 1822.279 Loan supervision and servicing.

Loan supervision and loan servicing will be provided according to 7 CFR part 3560.

[69 FR 69104, Nov. 26, 2004]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted from the December 31, 1997
10-K and is qualified in it's entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                            7415
<SECURITIES>                                     43989
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1793
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   527
<PP&E>                                            3752
<DEPRECIATION>                                     884
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   56592
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            34931
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           368
<OTHER-SE>                                       21293
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     56592
<SALES>                                          37743
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 37743
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 30788
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 816
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   6139
<INCOME-TAX>                                      2274
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               3865
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      3865
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.09
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

FREDRICK J. GAILOR, JR. and

CATHERINE ANN FORM,

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No. 3:20cv4494-TKW-EMT 

WALMART CORPORATION STORE 

#3235, et al.,

Defendants.

/

OR D E R

This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and 

Recommendation (Doc. 8) and Plaintiffs’ objection (Doc. 9). Based on my de novo 

review of the issues raised in the objection, I agree with the magistrate judge’s 

determination that this case should be transferred to the Southern District of Florida 

because it involves allegations of public accommodation discrimination by 

employees of a Walmart store located in North Miami Beach. See 28 U.S.C. 

§1391(b)(2) (explaining that venue is proper in the district in which a substantial 

part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred). 

The Court has not overlooked Plaintiffs’ conclusory assertion that they “fear 

provable prejudice from Dade County” (Doc. 9, at 1); however, there is no basis for 

this assertion in the record, and even if there was, it would have no bearing on the 

Case 3:20-cv-04494-TKW-EMT Document 10 Filed 06/08/20 Page 1 of 2
2

question of the proper venue for this suit. Moreover, it is noteworthy that this case 

is being transferred to another federal district court over which Dade County has no 

control or influence. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiffs’ objection (Doc. 9) is overruled, and the magistrate judge’s 

Report and Recommendation (Doc. 8) is adopted by the Court and 

incorporated into this Order.

2. This case is TRANSFERRED to the Southern District of Florida, and the 

Clerk shall close the file in this Court.

DONE and ORDERED this 8th day of June, 2020.

T. Kent Wetherell, II 

T. KENT WETHERELL, II

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-04494-TKW-EMT Document 10 Filed 06/08/20 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v. Case Nos.: 3:97cr6/RV/CJK

 3:17cv354/RV/CJK

SHERWIN D. KNIGHT,

______________________________/

ORDER

This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge’s Report and

Recommendation dated August 24, 2017 (doc. 518). Defendant has been furnished

a copy of the Report and Recommendation and has been afforded an opportunity to

file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No

objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined that the

Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Defendant’s failure to comply

with an order of the court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 27th day of September, 2017.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

ADOLPHUS T. ROOKS,

FDOC Inmate No. 034390,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 3:20cv5350-MCR-EMT

NURSE PHILLIPS, et al.,

Defendants.

________________________/

O R D E R

The chief magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on June 15, 

2021. ECF No. 16. The parties were furnished a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, 

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all 

timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed 

objections thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be 

adopted.

Case 3:20-cv-05350-MCR-EMT Document 17 Filed 07/27/21 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:20cv5350-MCR-EMT

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 16, 

is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. Plaintiff’s amended complaint, ECF No. 14, is DISMISSED WITH 

PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 

3. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this 

order and close the case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 27th day of July 2021.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-05350-MCR-EMT Document 17 Filed 07/27/21 Page 2 of 2
! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 !
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 "
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 #
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 $
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 %
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 &
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 '
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 (
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 )
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 !
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 "
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 #
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 $
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 %
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 &
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 '
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 (
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 ! )
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 ! 
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 ! !
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 ! "
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 ! #
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 ! $
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 ! %
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 ! &
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 ! '
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 ! (
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 " )
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 " 
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 " !
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 " "
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 " #
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 " $
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 " %
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 " &
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 " '
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 " (
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 # )
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 # 
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 # !
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 # "
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 # #
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 # $
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 # %
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 # &
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 # '
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 # (
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 $ )
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 $ 

0 . * 45 2. 0 .( 6 ( . 7 * 689 . ' 2 : . 2' (' ( ; : . 2'
 ! "# $ & ' ( ) * + , - . / . 0 1 . 2 # , # 3 $ !

9 .< 8/ =. > ? @ ? > > A B A C C D > E F 3G ?& H D C D C I I ?C @ E B D - A
###### Editorial Note on Part 1951

#### Editorial Notes:

1. Some of the exhibits referenced in this part 1951 are not published in the Code of Federal Regulations. Exhibits are available in any Rural Development office.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1951 appear at 80 FR 9890-9894, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1951.254 [Reserved]
#### § 2018.252 Public inspection and copying.

Facilities for inspection and copying are provided by the Freedom of Information Officer (FOIO) in the National Office, by the State Director in each State Office, by the Rural Development Manager (formerly, District Director) in each District Office, and by the Community Development Manager (formerly, County Supervisor) in each County Office. A person requesting information may inspect such materials and, upon payment of applicable fees, obtain copies. Material may be reviewed during regular business hours. If any of the Rural Development materials requested are not located at the office to which the request was made, the request will be referred to the office where such materials are available.