alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Subchapter C of Chapter II
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter C appear by Amdt. 381, 65 FR 64586, Oct. 30, 2000.

Editorial Note on Part 272
Editorial Note: OMB control numbers relating to this part 272 are contained in § 271.8.

§ 272.14 Deceased matching system. ( a ) *General.* Each State agency shall establish a system to verify and ensure that benefits are not issued to individuals who are deceased.
( b ) *Data source.* States shall use the SSA's Death Master File, obtained through the State Verification and Exchange System (SVES) and enter into a computer matching agreement with SSA pursuant to authority to share data contained in 42 U.S.C. 405(r)(3).
( c ) *Use of match data.* States shall provide a system for: ( 1 ) Comparing identifiable information about each household member against information from databases on deceased individuals. States shall make the comparison of matched data at the time of application and no less frequently than once a year.
( 2 ) The reporting of instances where there is a match;
( 3 ) The independent verification of match hits to determine their accuracy;
( 4 ) Notice to the household of match results. The State must use the procedures laid forth in § 273.12(c)(3)(iii) of this chapter;
( 5 ) An opportunity for the household to respond to the match prior to an adverse action to deny, reduce, or terminate benefits; and
( 6 ) The establishment and collection of claims as appropriate.
[77 FR 48055, Aug. 13, 2012, as amended at 82 FR 2035, Jan. 6, 2017]
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Resource: Attachment Behaviors in Children with Incarcerated Fathers      

# Resource: Attachment Behaviors in Children with Incarcerated Fathers

This podcast, created by the Institute for Research on Poverty, describes a new study on attachment in children who have an incarcerated father and discusses some of the factors that may lead to differences in children’s attachment behaviors. 

http://www.irp.wisc.edu/publications/media/podcasts/PC57-2017-August.mp3?utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=Resources
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

The National Science Board's Ad Hoc Committee on Honorary Awards, pursuant to NSF regulations (45 CFR part 614), the National Science Foundation Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1862n-5), and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in regard to the scheduling of a teleconference for the transaction of National Science Board business and other matters specified, as follows:

# Date and Time:

November 23, 2010, 3:30 p.m.-4:30 p.m.

# Subject Matter:

Review and discussion of selection criteria, discussion of candidates for the 2010 Vannevar Bush Award, and discussion of candidates for the 2010 National Science Board Public Service Awards.

# Status:

Closed.

# Location:

This meeting will be held at National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230.

# Updates & Point of Contact:

                        Please refer to the National Science Board Web site                         *http://www.nsf.gov/​nsb*                         for additional information and schedule updates (time, place, subject matter or status of meeting) may be found at                         *http://www.nsf.gov/​nsb/​notices/​*. Point of contact for this meeting is Jennie L. Moehlmann, National Science Board Office, 4201Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-7000.                    

Daniel A. Lauretano,

Counsel to the National Science Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-29092 Filed 11-15-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
#### MARRONEY, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 15, 1906.)

Action by James Marroney against the City of New York. C. S. Aronstam, for appellant. T. Connoly, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Order filed.

PATTERSON, J., dissents.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1980

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1980 appear at 80 FR 9905, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### §§ 1980.426-1980.431 [Reserved]
#### Vito M. Bertucci et al., Appellants, v Union Free School District No. 15 et al., Respondents.

Appeal from order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated August 8, 1978, dismissed (see *Matter of Aho,*39 NY2d 241, 248). Judgment of the same court, entered February 21, 1979, affirmed. No opinion. The defendants are awarded one bill of costs. Mollen, P. J., Gibbons, Martuscello and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
f10k2012ex10i_chinaceetop.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 





 




  





  











  






 





 




  





2











  






 





 




  





3











  






 





 


4
###### Editorial Note on Part 1951

#### Editorial Notes:

1. Some of the exhibits referenced in this part 1951 are not published in the Code of Federal Regulations. Exhibits are available in any Rural Development office.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1951 appear at 80 FR 9890-9894, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1951.250 OMB control number.

The reporting and recordkeeping requirements contained in this regulation have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget and have been assigned OMB Control Number 0575-0066. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to vary from fifteen minutes to three hours per response including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information.

[55 FR 4399, Feb. 8, 1990, as amended at 69 FR 70884, Dec. 8, 2004]
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2188 

To amend title 37, United States Code, to ensure that footwear furnished 

or obtained by allowance for enlisted members of the Armed Forces 

upon their initial entry into the Armed Forces complies with domestic 

source requirements. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 23, 2013 

Mr. MICHAUD (for himself and Ms. PINGREE of Maine) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 37, United States Code, to ensure that footwear furnished or obtained by allowance for enlisted 

members of the Armed Forces upon their initial entry 

into the Armed Forces complies with domestic source 

requirements. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2188 IH

1 SECTION 1. COMPLIANCE WITH DOMESTIC SOURCE RE2 QUIREMENTS OF FOOTWEAR FURNISHED OR 

3 OBTAINED BY ALLOWANCE FOR ENLISTED 

4 MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES UPON 

5 THEIR INITIAL ENTRY INTO THE ARMED 

6 FORCES. 

7 Section 418(a) of title 37, United States Code, is 

8 amended— 

9 (1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ after ‘‘(b)’’; and 

10 (2) by adding at the end the following new 

11 paragraph: 

12 ‘‘(2)(A) The footwear prescribed under this section 

13 to be furnished to, or to be paid for by allowance under 

14 this section by, members upon their initial entry into 

15 armed forces shall comply with the requirements of section 

16 2533a of title 10, without regard to the applicability of 

17 any simplified acquisition threshold under chapter 137 of 

18 title 10 (or any other provision of law) to the use of such 

19 allowance for such footwear. 

20 ‘‘(B) Subparagraph (A) does not apply to athletic 

21 footwear furnished to, or paid for by allowance by, a mem22 ber described in that subparagraph if such footwear— 

23 ‘‘(i) is medically required to meet unique phys24 iological needs of the member; and 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2188 IH

1 ‘‘(ii) cannot be met with athletic footwear that 

2 complies with the requirements referred to in that 

3 subparagraph.’’. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
 
 **CERTIFICATION**
 
  I, Glenn A. Jackson, certify that:
 1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Boundless Motor Sports Racing, Inc.2.
Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;4.
The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); andc) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;5.
The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and6.
The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
   ****Date: December ___, 2004
By:
/s/ Glenn A. JacksonGlenn A. JacksonChief Financial Officer
   
 1
Exhibit 32.2**Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906**In connection with the quarterly report of Orchids Paper Products Company (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Keith R. Schroeder, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 ofTitle 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.       /s/ Keith R. Schroeder     Keith R. Schroeder    Chief Financial Officer    May 4, 2007  
25
98-449.

#### State ex rel. LTV Steel Co. v. Conrad.

In Mandamus and Procedendo. On answer of respondents. *Sua sponte,*alternative writs granted.
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PUSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended October 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report fairly presents in all material respect the financial condition and results of operations of Vitro Diagnostics, Inc.   Date:  February 12, 2010 By:_/s/James R. Musick______ Name:  James R. Musick Title: President, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Vitro Diagnostics, Inc.
Non-Employee Directors' Annual Compensation



 EXHIBIT 10.12 
  
 VIRGINIA FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. 
  
 SCHEDULE OF NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS’ ANNUAL COMPENSATION 
  
 Effective January 1, 2005 
  

				
	 	  	Amount


	 Retainer Fees
	  	 	 
	 Service as a Director
	  	$	 —  
	 Service as a Committee Chair
	  	$	 —  
		
	 Meeting Fees (1)
	  	 	 
	 Base per month board meeting
	  	$	1,000
	 Attendance at monthly board meeting
	  	$	500
	 Base per committee meeting
	  	$	200
	 Attendance at committee meeting
	  	$	400
	 Attendance at committee meeting (day of board meeting)
	  	$	300



	(1)	All non-employee directors receive a base meeting fee of $1,000 per day for Corporation board
meetings plus an additional $500 if the meeting is attended. For committee meetings, the base meeting fee is $200 plus an additional $400 unless the meeting is the held on the same day as a board meeting, for which the additional fee is $300.
#### McCARTY, Respondent, v. NATURAL CARBONIC GAS CO., Appellant

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

June 27, 1906.)

Action by Richard H. McCarty against the Natural Carbonic Gas Company.

No opinion. Judgment modified by deducting therefrom $18 as of November 8, 1905, the date of entry thereof, and, as so modified, unanimously affirmed, with costs to the respondent.
§ 1770.12 Supplementary accounts. ( a ) All borrowers shall maintain the supplementary accounts set forth in § 1770.15. These accounts conform in number and title with accounts prescribed in the FCC Uniform System of Accounts. In those instances in which a State regulatory body having jurisdiction over an RUS borrower has prescribed a system of accounts differing from that of the FCC, the account titles prescribed by RUS in § 1770.15 shall remain unchanged; however, the supplementary account numbers shall be changed to conform with the State's accounting system.
( b ) In addition to the accounts set forth in § 1770.15, cooperative or other nonprofit borrowers shall maintain the supplementary accounts set forth in § 1770.16.
( c ) Borrowers are permitted to deviate from the specific subaccount numbers detailed in §§ 1770.15 and 1770.16 provided that the primary account numbers and account descriptions conform with those prescribed.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0572-0003)
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 205 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the treatment of 

certain retirement plan contributions picked up by governmental employers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2013 

Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify 

the treatment of certain retirement plan contributions 

picked up by governmental employers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF TREATMENT OF CERTAIN 

4 RETIREMENT PLAN CONTRIBUTIONS PICKED 

5 UP BY GOVERNMENTAL EMPLOYERS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 414(h) 

7 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘For purposes of paragraph 

9 (1)’’ and inserting the following: 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•HR 205 IH

1 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of para2 graph (1)’’, and 

3 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub4 paragraph: 

5 ‘‘(B) TREATMENT OF ELECTIONS BE6 TWEEN ALTERNATIVE BENEFIT FORMULAS.— 

7 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of 

8 subparagraph (A), a contribution shall not 

9 fail to be treated as picked up by an em10 ploying unit merely because the employee 

11 may make an irrevocable election between 

12 the application of two alternative benefit 

13 formulas involving the same or different 

14 levels of employee contributions. 

15 ‘‘(ii) APPLICATION TO EXISTING EM16 PLOYEES.—Clause (i) shall be applied 

17 without regard to whether the employee is 

18 already covered by one of the benefit for19 mulas referred to therein.’’. 

20 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

21 this section shall apply to years ending after the date of 

22 the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 17, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-50658

Summary Calendar

 

DAVID GUEL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JAMES D. ROCHE, Secretary 

U.S. Air Force

Defendant-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

San Antonio Division

USDC No. SA-04-CA-152-OG

--------------------

Before JONES, WIENER, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

In February 2004 David Guel ("Plaintiff") filed his original

complaint against James D. Roche, Secretary U.S. Air Force

("Defendant") asserting that Guel was discriminated against on the

basis of his national origin (Hispanic), and age (51), when he was

terminated from his employment as a sheet metal worker at Randolph

Air Force Base in Texas. Defendant answered, and in February 2005

filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. In April 2005 the District
No. 05-50658

-2-

2

Court granted Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, concluding

that Plaintiff had not shown a prima facie case of discrimination.

Final judgment in favor of Defendant was entered on July 20,

2005. Plaintiff timely appealed to this court.

We have carefully reviewed the Briefs, the Reply Brief, the

Record Excerpts, and relevant portions of the Record itself. For

the reasons stated by the District Court in its Order Granting

Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, we affirm the Final

Judgment entered on July 20, 2005. AFFIRMED.
* The case is unanimously ordered submitted without oral argument pursuant to

Fed. R. App. P. 34(a) and 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### NOV 6 1997 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT
DAVID ARNOLD DEFOE, Petitioner - Appellant, v. STATE OF UTAH, Respondent - Appellee. No. 97-4096 (D.C. No. 97-CV-130-B) (District of Utah)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before BALDOCK , MCKAY and LUCERO , Circuit Judges. Upon a review of the Application for Certificate of Appealability, and materials submitted by the petitioner in support th ereof, it does not appear that petitioner has exhausted his state remedies. Accor dingly, his Application for Certificate of Appealability is DENIED without prej udice to renewal when exhaustion has occurred in accordance with 28 U.S.C . § 2254 (b) and (c) and Picard v. Connor , 404 U.S. 270 (1971).- 2 -

The mandate shall issue forthwith. ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Carlos F. Lucero Circuit Judge
#### § 227.43 Participation of adults.

Nothing in this part shall prohibit a State or local educational agency from making available or distributing to adults education materials, resources, activities or programs authorized by this part.