alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals

For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 21-12026

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

SERAFIN JARAMILLO-ECHEVERRIA,

a.k.a. Serafin Jaramillo,

a.k.a. Primo, 

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Alabama

D.C. Docket No. 2:15-cr-00146-MHH-GMB-1

____________________

USCA11 Case: 21-12026 Date Filed: 01/25/2022 Page: 1 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 21-12026

Before ROSENBAUM, LUCK, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

J.D. Lloyd, appointed counsel for Serafin Jaramillo-Echeverria in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review 

of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative 

merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination 

of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s 

motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Jaramillo’s convictions and 

sentences are AFFIRMED.

USCA11 Case: 21-12026 Date Filed: 01/25/2022 Page: 2 of 2
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:**

__ 2011

________ - NM -

___ 275

______ - AD **Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant ? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
P. 1 

# OAR Box 1338 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



## Document

Number: 

# 7 ) ll-E-1 8 Docket Number: 

# A-89-1 0

Printed 6/17/20081:48:05PM

Sheet 7 of 105P. 2 

# A-89-1 0

II-E-1 8 CORPORATI O CONTAC TREPOR T ; ' ' ' ' 5 

# ra

# [^9 ! 

# ..

• Wclf\ f /7ff i originato r T^ W Dat e CONTAC TBY : TELEPHON E W MEETIN G D Othe r NAME , TITL E & ORGANIZATIO N /^c b (£ f /KCi^ Ar^ k

%,/ ( cco U < ^

f„ ,WWJADDRES S & TELEPHON E NUMBE R 

# ^-^. n 

# o t

QW^bk^GA PURPOS E O R SUBJEC

T(Giv e project numbe ri f appropriate ) 

# C05- C SUMMAR

Y 

# V,**- ^ ***> ^ r**^># - 4/^rrf pp-p , <^

c

^<UA ,^i^! ^ .^JLWJ^ ^ pit) - - f7C f 17 /

= #/ ^
r"4—

' J "/ " /

Distribution :
|National Park ServiceU.S. Department of the InteriorOlympic National ParkPort Angeles, WashingtonNPS logoOlympic National Park Business PlanFiscal Year 2001mountain lakePhoto copyright Pat O'HaraCopyright © National Park Service 2003U.S. Department of the InteriorOlympic National ParkPort Angeles, Washington> Contents <Next >>>http://www.nps.gov/olym/bp/index.htm06-Jul-2004 |          | National Park ServiceU.S. Department of the InteriorOlympic National ParkPort Angeles, Washington | NPS logo |          |  |  | > Contents < |  | Next >>>
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------- | -------- |  |  | ------------ |  | --------
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|National Park ServiceU.S. Department of the InteriorOlympic National ParkPort Angeles, Washington                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   | NPS logo
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |          | > Contents <                                                                                        |          | Next >>>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. 

ROBERT V. SMITH, 

 Plaintiff,

vs.

JAY A. ODOM; OKALOOSA COUNTY, 

BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS,

 Defendants. 

Civil case No. 

3:20-cv-3678-MCR/EMT

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

COMES NOW the United States of America and gives notice that the United States of 

America is represented in this action by U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Division Trial 

Attorney David M. Sobotkin. All further pleadings and correspondence in this action should be 

directed to the undersigned.

Respectfully submitted,

JEFFREY BOSSERT CLARK

Acting Assistant Attorney General

JAMIE ANN YAVELBERG

Director

SARA MCLEAN

Assistant Director

Case 3:20-cv-03678-MCR-EMT Document 13 Filed 12/15/20 Page 1 of 3
/s/ David M. Sobotkin

DAVID M. SOBOTKIN

N.Y. Bar No. 4480018

Trial Attorney

U.S. Department of Justice

Civil Division, Fraud Section

Post Office Box 261

Ben Franklin Station

Washington, D.C. 20044

Telephone: (202) 353-1291

Email: david.m.sobotkin@usdoj.gov

Dated: December 15, 2020

Case 3:20-cv-03678-MCR-EMT Document 13 Filed 12/15/20 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was 

electronically filed via CM/ECF on this 15th day of December, 2020. 

/s/ David M. Sobotkin

DAVID M. SOBOTKIN

Case 3:20-cv-03678-MCR-EMT Document 13 Filed 12/15/20 Page 3 of 3
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS

*May 30, 2006*

[Cite as *05130/2006 Case Announcements,*2006-Ohio-2628.]

MEDIATION REFERRALS

2006-0652.

#### Meijer Stores Ltd. Partnership v. Defiance Cty. Bd. of Revision.

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2003-T-2035.

The following case has been returned to the regular docket pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(6)(E):
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2079 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2079

To provide for a three-year extension of the authority of the Secretary 
 of Veterans Affairs to provide for the conduct of medical disability 
                  examinations by contract physicians.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 21, 2013

 Mr. Radel (for himself and Mr. Salmon) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide for a three-year extension of the authority of the Secretary 
 of Veterans Affairs to provide for the conduct of medical disability 
                  examinations by contract physicians.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Expediting Veteran's Benefits Act''.

SEC. 2. THREE-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY OF THE SECRETARY OF VETERANS 
              AFFAIRS TO PROVIDE FOR THE CONDUCT OF MEDICAL DISABILITY 
              EXAMINATIONS BY CONTRACT PHYSICIANS.

    Section 704(c) of the Veterans Benefits Act of 2003 (Public Law 
108-183; 38 U.S.C. 5101 note) is amended by striking ``December 31, 
2013'' and inserting ``December 31, 2016''.
                                 <all>
```
#### The State ex rel. Mitchell, Appellant, *v.*General Motors Corporation, Packard Electric Division, et al., Appellees.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Mitchell v. Gen. Motors Corp., Packard Elec. Div.*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 378.]

(No. 96-1445

Submitted August 19, 1998

Decided October 14, 1998.)

*Weiner, Suit & Coury*and *Paul W. Newendorp,*for appellant.

*Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, Robert A. Minor*and *Jacklyn J. Ford,*for appellee General Motors Corporation.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *David J. Kovach,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission.

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed. The cause is returned to the Industrial Commission for relief consistent with *State ex rel. Noll v. Indus. Comm.*(1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 203, 567 N.E.2d 245.

Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.

Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

dissenting. I dissent and would affirm the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., and Cook, J., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion.
#### § 201.9 Kind.

The name of each kind of seed present in excess of 5 percent shall be shown on the label and need not be accompanied by the word “kind.” When two or more kinds of seed are named on the label, the name of each kind shall be accompanied by the percentage of each. When only one kind of seed is present in excess of 5 percent and no variety name or type designation is shown, the percentage of that kind may be shown as “pure seed” and such percentage shall apply only to seed of the kind named.

[5 FR 30, Jan. 4, 1940]
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:95cr3093LAC

CHARLES SPIGNER, JR.

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on December 22, 2008

Motion/Pleadings: Motion to Dismiss Defendant’s Motion for Modification of Sentence

Filed byGovernment on12/22/08 Doc.# 215

RESPONSES:

on Doc.#

on Doc.#

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

s/Mary Maloy

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 9th day of

January, 2009, that:

(a) The relief requested is GRANTED.

(b) 

 s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

Senior United States District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 3:95-cr-03093-LC-CJK Document 216 Filed 01/09/09 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. CASE NO. 1:02-cr-00029-MP

CASE NO. 1:06-cr-00041-MP

SHEILA GILLINS,

RAYMOND REED, JR.,

Defendants.

________________________________/

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court on Docs. 88, 89, and 92, filed by Defendant Raymond

Reed, Jr., and Doc. 91, filed by Defendant Sheila Gillins. These motions were filed by the

Defendants prior to the appointment of counsel. Now that both Defendants are represented by

counsel, the Court finds that the above-referenced motions are moot. Therefore, the pending

motions are denied without prejudice. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

Docs. 88, 89, 91, and 92 are denied without prejudice.

DONE AND ORDERED this 11th day of July, 2007

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:02-cr-00029-MP-GRJ Document 126 Filed 07/11/07 Page 1 of 1
THIS ADVERTISEMENT PREPARED BY FCB-NEW YORK

Client Folder: IRS_EITC_P1798

Doc.Name: P1798_A.qxd

Date: 06/01/04

Fonts:

Software: Quark, photoshop, illustrator

A.D.: K Stevens 3184

A.E.: Kristin Stefanski x3950

D laffan 3975, R Rupple 2896

Production: Erin Brennan 3962

Traffic: Galina Margolina 2864

Project Manager: s karr 3158

Artist(s): sk, cdd, sk

Notes:

Proof Number: 10 9

Signature / Initials 

Traffic

Proofreader

Art Director

Copywriter

Creative Dir.

Acct. Exec.

Acct. Supv.

Mgt. Supv.

Legal

Production

Studio QC

TRAFFIC: Indicate “ok to release” 

via DIGITAL TRANSFER (T-1, Wam

and VENDOR when applica

Studio will not be responsible for jobs released 

Initials 

OK to RELEASE❑ DISK ❑ DIGITAL

OK TO RELEA

APPROVAL ST

Job #: IRS_EITC P1798 A

P.O.

Client: IRS

Product: Post Card

Headline: Qualifying for the EITC

Visual: Flower

Pub:

Space Description: 4/c

Size: Trim: 5 x 7

Bleed: .125 all around

Qualifying for the EITC isn’t a matter of luck.

(Just turn over this card to see if you’re eligible)
Publication 4338 Catalog Number 38517Q (6-2004)

THIS ADVERTISEMENT PREPARED BY FCB-NEW YORK

Client Folder: IRS_EITC_P1798

Doc.Name: P1798_A.qxd

Date: 06/01/04

Fonts:

Software: Quark, photoshop, illustrator

A.D.: K Stevens 3184

A.E.: Kristin Stefanski x3950

D laffan 3975, R Rupple 2896

Production: Erin Brennan 3962

Traffic: Galina Margolina 2864

Project Manager: s karr 3158

Artist(s): sk, cdd, sk

Notes:

Proof Number: 10 9

Signature / Initials 

Traffic

Proofreader

Art Director

Copywriter

Creative Dir.

Acct. Exec.

Acct. Supv.

Mgt. Supv.

Legal

Production

Studio QC

TRAFFIC: Indicate “ok to releas

via DIGITAL TRANSFER (T-1, W

and VENDOR when app

Studio will not be responsible for jobs releas

Init

OK to RELEASE❑ DISK ❑ DIGITAL

OK TO RELE

APPROVAL S

Job #: IRS_EITC P1798 A

P.O.

Client: IRS

Product: Post Card

Headline: Qualifying for the EITC

Visual: Flower

Pub:

Space Description: 4/c

Size: Trim: 5 x 7

Bleed: .125 all around
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

IN RE: REFERRAL OF CIVIL AND CRIMINAL Misc. No.: 4:95mc40111 

 

CASES TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

GARY R. JONES

 

ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER

Gary R. Jones was appointed as a United State Magistrate Judge in the Northern District

 of Florida, Gainesville Division, effective September 13, 2010. With this appointment, the

court’s administrative order entered on March 10, 2010, document #121, is hereby rescinded and

the Clerk is directed to reassign to Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones all pending cases assigned to

Magistrate Judge Allan Kornblum.

The Court’s order Re: Referral of Civil and Criminal Cases to Magistrate Judges, dated

September 30, 2008, document #112, will remain in effect with Magistrate Judge Jones’ name

replacing Magistrate Judge Kornblum in the case assignment decks.

SO ORDERED this 10th day of September, 2010.

Stephan P. Mickle

Chief United States District Judge
1998 Employee Share Purchase Plan



 Exhibit 10.5A 
  
 AMENDMENT TO THE XOMA LTD. 
 1998 EMPLOYEE SHARE PURCHASE PLAN 
  
 The XOMA Ltd. 1998 Employee Share Purchase Plan, as amended (the “Plan”), is hereby amended, effective as of July 21, 2004, as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Section 5(a) of the Plan is amended to read as follows: 

  
 “(a) An eligible Employee may become a participant in the Plan by completing a subscription agreement authorizing payroll deductions
in a form prepared by the Company and filing it with the Company’s Human Resources Department at least one (1) day prior to the applicable Enrollment Date for a particular Offering Period, unless a different time for filing the subscription
agreement is set by the Committee for all eligible Employees with respect to a given Offering Period.” 
  

	 	2.	Section 6(c) of the Plan is amended to read as follows: 

  
 “(c) Once an Offering Period has commenced, a participant may decrease, but not increase, the rate of his or her payroll deductions
for that Offering Period once per calendar quarter by filing a new subscription agreement at least one (1) day prior to the beginning of the calendar quarter (or such other time set by the Committee for all eligible Employees with respect to a given
Offering Period), which decrease shall become effective at the beginning of the next calendar quarter; provided, however, that a participant may discontinue his or her participation in the Plan, as provided in Section 10 hereof, at any
time during the Offering Period prior to the Exercise Date. During an Offering Period, a participant may elect to have new or additional payroll deductions made with respect to the next beginning Offering Period, by completing or filing with the
Company an additional subscription agreement, at least one (1) day prior to the beginning of the next Offering Period (or such other time set by the Committee for all eligible Employees with respect to a given Offering Period), authorizing a payroll
deduction rate with respect to the new Offering Period. A participant’s subscription agreement shall remain in effect for other Offering Periods, but separate subscription agreements are required for each Offering Period.”
#### § 28.192 No voiding or modifying claims for payment.

Nothing in this subpart shall be construed to void or modify any claim which a person or party requesting and paying for a service may have against any other person or party for the payment of part or all of such costs.

[81 FR 7031, Feb. 10, 2016]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsCharacteristic impedance of microstrip linesThe dyadic Green's function for a current embedded in a grounded dielectric slab is used to analyze microstrip lines at millimeter wave frequencies. The dyadic Green's function accounts accurately for fringing fields and dielectric cover over the microstrip line. Using Rumsey's reaction concept, an expression for the characteristic impedance is obtained. The numerical results are compared with other reported results.Document ID19900004378Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsBailey, M. C.*(NASA Langley Research Center Hampton, VA., United States)*Deshpande, M. D.*(Vigyan Research Associates, Inc., Hampton VA., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateNovember 1, 1989Subject CategoryCommunications And RadarReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:101581NASA-TM-101581Accession Number90N13694Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-44-21-03Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900004378.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Exhibit 31.1**Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302**I, Michael P. Sage, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Orchids Paper Products Company (the“Registrant”);2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) [reserved](c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date:  May 4, 2007 /s/ Michael P. Sage   Michael P. Sage   Chief Executive Officer and President  
22
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc.(the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),we, James F. Cleary, Jr. and Mary Patricia B. Thompson, ChiefExecutive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:

 
|   | (1) | The  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                   |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (2) | The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as  of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report. |

 

 

July 29,2010

 

 
| /s/  James F. Cleary, Jr.  |     |
|--------------------------------------|----------|
| James  F. Cleary, Jr.           |     |
| *Chief  Executive Officer*           | * * |
|                                 |     |
|                                 |     |
| /s/  Mary Patricia B. Thompson  |     |
| Mary  Patricia B. Thompson           |     |
| *Chief  Financial Officer*           | * * |

* *

----