alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 225.10 Audits and management evaluations. ( a ) *Audits.* State agencies shall arrange for audits of their own operations to be conducted in accordance with 2 CFR part 200, subpart F and USDA implementing regulations 2 CFR part 400 and part 415. Unless otherwise exempt, sponsors shall arrange for audits to be conducted in accordance with 2 CFR part 200, subpart F and USDA implementing regulations 2 CFR part 400 and part 415. State agencies shall provide OIG with full opportunity to audit the State agency and sponsors. Unless otherwise exempt, audits at the State and sponsor levels shall be conducted in accordance with 2 CFR part 200, subpart F and Appendix XI, Compliance Supplement and USDA implementing regulations 2 CFR part 400 and part 415. While OIG shall rely to the fullest extent feasible upon State-sponsored audits of sponsors, it shall, when considered necessary, ( 1 ) make audits on a State-wide basis,
( 2 ) perform on-site test audits, and
( 3 ) review audit reports and related working papers of audits performed by or for State agencies.
( b ) *Management evaluations.* ( 1 ) State agencies shall provide FNS with full opportunity to conduct management evaluations (including visits to sponsors) of all operations of the State agency. Each State agency shall make available its records, including records of the receipts and expenditures of funds, upon a reasonable request by FNS.
( 2 ) The State agency shall fully respond to any recommendations made by FNSRO pursuant to the management evaluation.
( 3 ) FNSRO may require the State agency to submit on 20 days notice a corrective action plan regarding serious problems observed during any phase of the management evaluation.
( c ) *Disregards.* In conducting management evaluations or audits for any fiscal year, the State agency, FNS or OIG may disregard overpayment which does not exceed $100 or, in the case of State agency administered programs, does not exceed the amount established by State law, regulations or procedures as a minimum for which claims will be made for State losses generally. No overpayment shall be disregarded, however, when there are unpaid claims for the same fiscal year from which the overpayment can be deducted or when there is substantial evidence of violation of criminal law or civil fraud statutes.
[54 FR 18208, Apr. 27, 1989, as amended at 71 FR 39518, July 13, 2006; 81 FR 66492, Sept. 28, 2016]
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
JOSE GRIM ALDI,

Pe t i tione r-Appe lla

nt,
v. K. HOLLAND,

R e sponde nt-Appe lle e . No. 14-56888 D.C . No. 2:14-c v-03729-JVS
M EM OR ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the C e ntra l Distric t of C a lifornia Jam e s V. Se lna , Distric t

Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Se pte m

be r 27, 2016 * * B e fore : TASHIM A , SILVER M AN, a nd M . SM ITH, C irc uit Judge s. C a lifornia sta te prisone r Jose Grim a ldi a ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt dismissing his 28 U.S.C . § 2254 ha be a s pe t ition. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 2253. W e re vie wde novo a dism issa l for fa ilure to e xha u st, se e 

# FIL ED
OCT 03 2016 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U

. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3.

* * The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).Rhoade

s v . He nry , 638 F.3d 1027, 1034 (9th C ir. 2010), a nd we va c ate and
re m and. Grim a ldi c onte nds tha

t the distric t c ourt e rre d

in dismissing his ha

be a s pe tition a s une xha

uste d be c a use it ha d disc re tion to sta y the proc e e dings. Afte r the distric t c o urt dismisse d Grim a ldi’ s pe tition, this c ourt he l d in Me na v . Long , 813 F.3d 907, 912 (9th C ir. 2016), tha t “ a distric t c ourt ha s the disc re tion to sta y and hold in a be y a nc e fully une xha uste d pe titions unde

r the c irc um sta

nc e s se t forth in Rhine s [ v . W e be r , 544 U.S. 269 (2005)] .” W e , the re fore , va c ate and re m and for the distric t c o urt to de te rm ine in the first insta nc e whe t he r Grim a ldi is e ntitle d to a sta y
and for a ny furthe r proc e e dings. W e e xpre s s no opinion a s to them e rits of Grim a ldi’ s c la i m s, or whe t he r the proc e d ura l re quire m e nts of 28 U.S.C . § 2244(d) a re satisfie d or Grim a ldi is e ntitle d to e q uita b le tolling. All pe nding m otions a

re de nie d a s m oot. VACAT E D and RE M ANDE D .

1 4
- 5 6 8 8 8 2
Summary Compensation Arrangements



 EXHIBIT 10.47 
  
 SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS 
  
 Annual Base Salary 
  
 Our executive officers are “at will” employees. Currently we have no written or oral employment arrangements with our executive officers. A copy
or description of any future such employment arrangement will be filed to the extent required. 
  
 The table below summarizes the current annual base salary we have with each of our named executive officers and directors. All of the compensation arrangements we have with our executive officers are reviewed and may
be modified from time to time by the Compensation and Stock Option Committee of our Board of Directors. 
  

				
	 Name

	  	Annual Base Salary


	 William S. Boyd
 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
	  	2005: $
2004: $	  1,500,000
1,200,000
		
	 Michael J. Gaughan
 Director and Chief Executive Officer of Coast Casinos, Inc.
	  	2005: $
2004: $	850,000
750,000
		
	 Robert L. Boughner
 Director and Chief Executive Officer of Marina District Development Holding Company, LLC
	  	2005: $
2004: $	825,000
725,000
		
	 Donald D. Snyder
 President and Director
	  	2005: $
2004: $	650,000
600,000
		
	 Keith E. Smith
 Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
	  	2005: $
2004: $	600,000
500,000
		
	 Ellis Landau
 Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	  	2005: $
2004: $	500,000
450,000
		
	 Marianne Boyd Johnson
 Vice Chairman and Senior Vice President
	  	2005: $
2004: $	200,000
175,000
		
	 William R. Boyd
 Vice President and Director
	  	2005: $
2004: $	175,000
160,000

  
 Bonus Plans, Director Compensation
Arrangements and Other Compensation 
  
 The information
regarding bonus plans, director compensation arrangements and other compensation is set forth in our most recent definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders (and any definitive Annual Proxy Statement filed after the date
hereof), which information is incorporated herein by reference.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsIndependent Orbiter Assessment (IOA): Assessment of the purge, vent and drain subsystemThe results of the Independent Orbiter Assessment (IOA) of the Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and Critical Items List (CIL) are presented. The IOA effort first completed an analysis of the Purge, Vent and Drain (PV and D) hardware, generating draft failure modes and potential critical items. To preserve independence, this analysis was accomplished without reliance upon the results contained within the NASA FMEA/CIL documentation. The IOA results were then compared to the NASA FMEA/CIL baseline with proposed Post 51-L updates included. A resolution of each discrepancy from the comparison is provided through additional analysis as required. This report documents the results of that comparison for the Orbiter PV and D hardware. The PV and D Subsystem controls the environment of unpressurized compartments and window cavities, senses hazardous gases, and purges Orbiter/ET disconnect.Document ID19900001633Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsBynum, M. C., III*(McDonnell-Douglas Astronautics Co. Houston, TX, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateFebruary 5, 1988Subject CategorySpace TransportationReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-185535NAS 1.26:185535REPT-1.0-WP-VA88005-02Accession Number90N10949Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS9-17650Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900001633.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Editorial Note on Part 1956
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1956 appear at 80 FR 9901, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1956.85 Payments and receipts. ( a ) *Servicing office handling.* ( 1 ) An application with which the debtor offers a lump-sum payment in compromise, or with which the debtor offers an initial payment on an adjustment offer, will be accompanied by the payments required at the time such application is filed in the servicing office.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( 3 ) Checks or check transmittal letter containing restrictive notations such as “Settlement in full” or “Payment in full,” or in those exceptional instances when the debtor refuses to sign the Form FmHA or its successor agency under Public Law 103-354 1956-1 in connection with a compromise offer, will be forwarded to the State Office where they will be retained until approval or rejection of the offer. The use of restrictive notations will be discouraged to the fullest extent possible.
( b ) *Finance Office handling.* ( 1 ) All payments evidenced by Form FmHA or its successor agency under Public Law 103-354 451-2, “Schedule of Remittances,” bearing the legend “Compromise Offer—FmHA or its successor agency under Public Law 103-354” or “Adjustment Offer—FmHA or its successor agency under Public Law 103-354,” will be held in the Deposits Fund Account by the Finance Office until notification is received from the State Office of the approval or rejection of the offer. In cases of approved offers, remittances will be applied in accordance with established policies, beginning with the oldest loan included in the settlement, except that when the request for settlement includes loans made from different revolving funds the Finance Office will prorate the amount received, on the basis of the total principal balance due the respective revolving funds. Upon notification of a rejection of a debtor's offer and receipt of a request from the State Director for a refund, the Finance Office will refund to the debtor, in care of the employee in charge of the account, the amount held in the Deposits Fund Account representing a rejected compromise or adjustment offer.
( 2 ) When a debtor's adjustment offer is approved, the accounts involved will not be adjusted in the records of the Finance Office until all payments have been made. Form FmHA or its successor agency under Public Law 103-354 1956-1 will be held in a suspense file pending payment of the full amount of the approved offer. The original Form FmHA or its successor agency under Public Law 103-354 1956-1 in approved cases will be retained in the Finance Office.
[56 FR 10147, Mar. 11, 1991, as amended at 58 FR 21345, Apr. 21, 1993; 68 FR 61332, Oct. 28, 2003; 69 FR 69106, Nov. 26, 2004]
§ 23.2 Administration. ( a ) Title V will be administered by the Director of the National Institute of Food and Agriculture in cooperation with the chief administrative officer of the State Land Grant University who will administer the program within his respective State. To assure national and State coordination with programs under the Smith-Lever Act of 1914 and the Hatch Act (as amended), August 11, 1955, the administration of the programs shall be in association with the programs conducted under the Smith-Lever Act and the Hatch Act as required by section 504(b) of the Act.
( b ) Programs authorized under title V shall be conducted as mutually agreed upon by the Secretary and the chief administrative officer of the State Land Grant University responsible for administering said programs in a memorandum of understanding which shall provide for the coordination of the programs, coordination of these programs with other rural development programs of Federal, State, and local government, and such other matters as the Secretary shall determine.
[38 FR 29023, Oct. 18, 1973, as amended at 76 FR 4804, Jan. 27, 2011]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                          5
<MULTIPLIER>                                    1000
       
<S>                                             <C>   
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 NOV-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                            44
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,821
<ALLOWANCES>                                     250
<INVENTORY>                                    2,549
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5,219
<PP&E>                                         2,571
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,075
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5,959
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,485
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                    1,200
<COMMON>                                          29
<OTHER-SE>                                       637
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5,959
<SALES>                                       12,067
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              12,067
<CGS>                                          6,960
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5,107
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  20
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               269
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  265
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                0
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                     265
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .06

        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 217 (Wednesday, November 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 69154]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28317]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Land Release for Long Island MacArthur Airport

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice, request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration is requesting public 
comment on the Long Island MacArthur Airport (ISP), Ronkonkoma, New 
York, notice of proposed release from aeronautical use of approximately 
17.69 acres of airport property, to allow for non-aeronautical 
development.
    The parcel is located on the northeast corner of the Long Island 
MacArthur Airport. The tract currently consists of 17.69 acres of land 
and it is currently vacant. The requested release is for the purpose of 
permitting the airport owner to sell and convey title of 17.62 acres 
for use by the Long Island Rail Road.
    Documents reflecting the Sponsor's request are available, by 
appointment only, for inspection at the Airport Managers office and the 
FAA New York Airport District Office.

DATES: Comments must be received by December 10, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this application may be mailed or delivered to 
the FAA at the following address: John R. Dermody, Manager, FAA New 
York Airports District Office, 600 Old Country Road, Suite 446, Garden 
City, New York 11530. In addition, a copy of any comments submitted to 
the FAA must be mailed or delivered to Ms. Teresa Rizzuto, Airport 
Manager, at the following address: 100 Arrival Avenue Ronkonkoma, NY. 
11799-7398.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John R. Dermody, Manager, New York 
Airports District Office, 600 Old Country Road, Suite 446, Garden City, 
New York 11530; telephone (516) 227-3803; FAX (516) 227-3813; e-mail 
John. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#571332253a38332e1731363679303821"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="135776617e7c776a537572723d747c65">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 125 of the Wendell H. Ford Aviation 
Investment and Reform Act for the 1st Century (AIR21) requires the FAA 
to provide an opportunity for public notice and comment before the 
Secretary may waive a sponsor's Federal obligation to use certain 
airport land for aeronautical use.

    Issued in Garden City, New York on November 2, 2010.
John R. Dermody,
Manager, New York Airports District Office, Eastern Region.
[FR Doc. 2010-28317 Filed 11-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Labor Relations Board

5 USC 4314(c)(4) requires that the appointments of individuals to serve as members of performance review boards be published in the                     **Federal Register**                    . Therefore, in compliance with this requirement, notice is hereby given that the individuals whose names and position titles appear below have been appointed to serve as members of performance review boards in the National Labor Relations Board for the rating year beginning October 1, 2009 and ending September 30, 2010.                

## Name and Title

William B. Cowen—Solicitor.

Kathleen A. Nixon—Deputy Chief Counsel to Board Member.

Gary W. Shinners—Deputy Executive Secretary.

Arlene Fine Klepper—Executive Assistant to the Chairman.

Barry J. Kearney—Associate General Counsel, Division of Advice.

Richard A. Siegel—Associate General Counsel, Division of Operations Management.

Gloria Joseph—Director of Administration, Division of Administration.

John H. Ferguson—Associate General Counsel, Division of Enforcement Litigation.

Washington, DC.

By Direction of the Board

Dated: November 12, 2010.

Lester A. Heltzer,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-28943 Filed 11-16-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: James Arthur, et al v. Blackburne & Brown Mortgage Fund, Inc.

Appellate case number: 01-20-00122-CV

Trial court case number: 2019-80239

Trial court: 11th District Court of Harris County

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(c), the district clerk is directed to file 

a supplemental clerk’s record containing the following documents:

(1) Defendant’s Answer and Counterclaims (filed-stamped November 27, 2019,

consisting of 9 pages);

(2) Defendant’s First Amended Answer and Counterclaims (filed-stamped 

August 10, 2020, consisting of 9 pages).

See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c)(1).

The supplemental clerk’s record shall be filed in the First Court of Appeals within 14 

days of the date of this order.

The cost of preparing this record will be assessed as part of the costs of this appeal upon 

issuance of this Court’s judgment.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Richard Hightower

Acting individually 

Date: September 14, 2021
§ 1780.41 Loan or grant approval. ( a ) The processing office will submit the following to the approval official: ( 1 ) Form RD 1942-45, “Project Summary”;
( 2 ) Form RD 442-7, “Operating Budget”;
( 3 ) Form RD 442-3, “Balance Sheet” or a financial statement or audit that includes a balance sheet;
( 4 ) Form RD 442-14, “Association Project Fund Analysis”;
( 5 ) “Letter of Conditions”;
( 6 ) Form RD 1942-46, “Letter of Intent to Meet Conditions”;
( 7 ) Form RD 1940-1, “Request for Obligation of Funds”;
( 8 ) Completed environmental review documents including copies of public notices and appropriate proof of publication, if applicable; and
( 9 ) Grant determination, if applicable.
( b ) Approval and applicant notification will be accomplished by mailing to the applicant on the obligation date a copy of Form RD 1940-1. The date the applicant is notified is also the date the interest rate at loan approval is established.
[62 FR 33478, June 19, 1997, as amended at 63 FR 68655, Dec. 11, 1998]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of SkyWest, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jerry C. Atkin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ JERRY C. ATKIN Jerry C. Atkin Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerFebruary 20, 2009


This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks