alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
September 3, 2014

US. Department ofTransportation Docket Operations West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Washington, DC 20590. My name is Lesly Sanchez Landron, Airman certificate number 3414012. Through this letter and in accordance with Title 14 Aeronautics and Space of the CFR, Section 11.81, I submit the following information and petition for an exemption of 14 Code of the FAR Part 65.91(c) (1). The main reason of my request is specific relief from the 3 year requirement with both certificates, to be eligible for an Inspection Authority. I have been active engage without interruption for more than 40 years in aviation maintenance and certification activities, Due to a certificate action on 2010, result of a controversial situation in which no violation was found, (FAA letter attached), my airframe authorization was removed from my Airframe and Power Plant Certificate, consequently losing my Inspector Authorization Permit. However I recover back the airframe certificate on June 2012, without any problem. (2 years and 3 months ago).
I understand that the purpose of 3 years minimum of continuous experience of the law is to protect the public from low time/experience Inspectors, 

### (A/1). By that reason there is no doubt that the principal intent of the regulation has been fully accomplished, taking into consideration previous experience. By this reason I understand that public safety is not an issue. Granting the exemption would not adversely affect safety, and would provide the level of provided by the rule. Additionally, the General Aviation community will benefit by having an additional source /alternative for their inspection requirements. I will appreciate your prompt attention to this matter. Thanks Sincerely:

Lesly Sanchez Landron. Physical and mailing address: Urb .Marina Bahia, RC-10 Ave. Punta Las Marias, Catano, P.R. 00962-6718. Tel.787-466-0906. Airman Certificate 3414012.

Attached: FAA Letter dated January 15, 2010

### U.S. Department of Transportation federal Aviation Administration 

### January 15, 2010 SANCHEZLANDRON, lESLIE 

### URB MARINABA..11IA RCIO AVEPUNTALAS MARIAS CAT.A.NO, PR00962-6718 MIAMI FLT STDS DIST OFFICE 8600 NW36TH STREET ROOM201 MIAMI, FL 33166 (305)716-3400



### The FederalAviation Administration (FAA) has investigated an allegedviolationthatreportedly occurred on**Friday~** 

### June 12, 2009 inthe vicinity ofSAN JUAN,RQ. This letteristo informyou thattheinvestigation did notestablish a violation oftheFederalAviation Regulations, andyou mayconsiderthematter Closed. Shouldyou have anyquestions, feel free tocontactouroffice.

AdditionalInformation OnBack
Additional Compensation Information




Exhibit
10.19




Additional
Compensation Information




On
February 8, 2005, the Compensation Committee of the Company recommended, and the
Board of Directors approved, the following 2005 annual base salaries payable to
M. Christine Jacobs, James A. MacLennan, Bruce W. Smith, R. Michael O’Bannon and
Tracy C. Caswell (the “Executive Officers”). With respect to Ms. Jacobs’ 2005
salary, the determination was made by the independent directors of the Company.


 

 


	
      Named
      Executive Officer
	
      Base
      Salary for

       2005

	
      Jacobs
	
      $431,000

	
      MacLennan
	
      $270,000

	
      Smith
	
      $237,000

	
      O’Bannon
	
      $186,000

	
      Caswell
	
      $180,000










Information
regarding director compensation is set forth in the Company’s Form 8-K filed
February 14, 2005 and incorporated by reference herein.
Editorial Note on Part 1948
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1948 appear at 80 FR 9888, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1948.62 Environmental impact requirements. ( a ) Issuance of grants and other actions taken under this subpart must comply with the environmental review requirements in accordance with 7 CFR part 1970.
( b ) Subsequent to an energy impact area designation by the Governor and establishment of priorities, the Rural Development State Director, in consultation with the Governor, shall define the geographic boundaries or otherwise delineate the areas which will be studied for environmental impacts.
( c ) Boundaries shall define the area within which the environmental impacts of the proposed action can be reasonably studied. Proper delineation of impact areas will avoid duplication of effort by using one assessment or impact statement to study a broad area rather than numerous overlapping documents prepared for smaller projects.
[44 FR 35984, June 19, 1979, as amended at 49 FR 3764, Jan. 30, 1984; 81 FR 11032, Mar. 2, 2016]
#### § 2500.101 Applicability of regulations.

The regulations in this subpart apply to the Outreach and Assistance for Socially Disadvantaged Farmers and Ranchers (OASDFR) Program authorized under section 2501 of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation and Trade Act of 1990 (7 U.S.C. 2279), as amended. Unless otherwise specified in this subpart, the requirements of 7 CFR part 2500 subparts A through E will apply in addition to the requirements discussed in this subpart.
§ 2502.6 Recipients of program benefits or services. ( a ) Those eligible to receive program services or benefits under the ACE program are farmworkers who meet the definition of “United States Workers” as set forth in § 2502.2 of this part.
( b ) Grantees shall be responsible for verifying the employment of farmworkers who are actively employed and are seeking to participate in program services or benefits. Unemployed farmworkers seeking to participate shall be required to certify to grantees that they are eligible for program services and benefits as provided herein. Additional eligibility requirements may be included in the RFP.
(May 29, 1980)

#### Edgar Moser, Inc., Petitioner, v State Division of Human Rights et al., Respondents.

Determination of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated September 4, 1979, unanimously confirmed, without costs and without disbursements. See CPLR 321 (subd [a]). No opinion. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Birns, Fein, Markewich and Lupiano, JJ.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Section 906 Certification**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), the undersigned officer ofCentennial Bank Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated: November 11, 2005 

 

 

The foregoingcertification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2002- 2241.

#### State v. Monroe.

Franklin C.P. No. 01CR04-2118. On application for reopening under S.Ct.Prac.R. XI(6). Application denied.
Exhibit 10.1


 


 





OFFICER DEMAND NOTE


 


Date: December 1, 2012


 


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Curry Gold Corp.,
("Borrower"), a Nevada Corporation, promises to pay to the order of Daniel M. Ferris ("Lender")
as much as may be disbursed to, or for the benefit of the Borrower by Lender in Lender's sole and absolute discretion. It is the
intent of the Borrower and Lender hereunder to create a line of credit agreement between Borrower and Lender whereby Borrower may
borrow funds as necessary from Lender; provided, however, that Lender has no obligation to lend Borrower any amounts hereunder
and the decision to lend such money lies in the sole and complete discretion of the Lender.


 


INTEREST & PRINCIPAL: The unpaid
principal of this line of credit shall bear simple interest at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum. Interest shall be calculated
based on the principal balance as may be adjusted from time to time to reflect additional advances made hereunder. Interest on
the unpaid balance of this Note shall accrue monthly but shall not be due and payable until such time as when the principal balance
of this Note becomes due and payable. The principal balance of this Note shall be due and payable on demand. There shall be no
penalty for early repayment of all or any part of the principal.


 


SECURITY: This Note shall be unsecured.


 


DEFAULT: The Borrower shall be in default
of this Note on the occurrence of any of the following events: (i) the Borrower shall fail to meet its obligation to make the required
principal or interest payments hereunder. (ii) the Borrower shall be dissolved or liquidated; (iii) the Borrower shall make an
assignment for the benefit of creditors or shall be unable to, or shall admit in writing their inability to pay their debts as
they become due; (iv) the Borrower shall commence any case, proceeding, or other action under any existing or future law of any
jurisdiction relating to bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization or relief of debtors, or any such action shall be commenced against
the undersigned; (v) the Borrower shall suffer a receiver to be appointed for it or for any of its property or shall suffer a garnishment,
attachment, levy or execution.


 


REMEDIES: Upon default of this Note,
Lender may declare the entire amount due and owing hereunder to be immediately due and payable. Lender may also use all remedies
in law and in equity to enforce and collect the amount owed under this Note.


 


Borrower hereby waives demand, presentment,
notice of dishonor, diligence in collecting, grace and notice of protest.


 


BORROWER: 


 


/s/ Daniel M. Ferris                            





CURRY GOLD CORP.


DANIEL M. FERRIS, CEO
EXHIBIT 10.62Cardiac Science CorporationCertain Executive Officers — 2007 Base Salaries     Base salary amounts were approved by the Compensation Committee, effective March 15, 2007, asset forth below. The compensation arrangement between the Company and each executive officer listedbelow is governed by an employment agreement between the Company and each executive officer.       **Name** **Title** **2007 Base Salary**       John Hinson President and Chief Executive Officer $350,000        Michael Matysik Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary $240,000        Kurt Lemvigh Vice President, International DK1,799,640        Darryl Lustig Vice President, North America Cardiology Sales $215,000        Garry Norris Vice President, Marketing $225,000
#### Clinton Buck, Individually, and as Husband of Evelyn Buck, et al., Respondents, v Alfred Pritchard, Jr., Appellant. Clinton Buck et al., as Parents and Natural Guardians of Phillip C. Buck and Another, Respondents, v Alfred Pritchard, Jr., Appellant.

Order unanimously reversed, with costs, and motion for a protective order granted in accordance with the following memorandum: Plaintiffs are residents of the State of Tennessee. They initiated these actions to recover for personal injuries sustained in a rear end automobile collision occurring in Syracuse, New York, on August 9, 1973. The case first appeared upon the Trial Calendar on March 6, 1978 but was removed to the general docket when the parties failed to proceed to trial. Upon motion of the plaintiffs it was subsequently removed from the docket on April 30, 1979, the court order improperly restoring it to the Day Calendar rather than to the foot of the General Calendar. A date certain was set for trial but subsequently that date was adjourned generally to accommodate the vacation plans of plaintiffs’ counsel. Thereafter a motion was made by plaintiffs’ Tennessee attorneys, who were not the attorneys of record in this action, to depose plaintiffs’ doctor in Memphis, Tennessee. Defendant then moved for a protective order and plaintiffs cross-moved for an order compelling the taking of interrogatories. Special Term denied the motion for a protective order and granted the cross motion. The order is reversed. The delay of the trial of this action is inexcusable. The case having been twice certified as ready for trial by plaintiffs, it was an abuse of discretion to grant the relief requested and hold the action generally while the case remained on the Day Calendar. The motion for a protective order is granted without prejudice to a proper application to take the physician’s testimony by deposition or interrogatories, if counsel be so advised, but only after the case has been removed to the general docket. When the case is really ready for trial it may be restored to the General Calendar upon a proper application, but if it is restored, it should take its normal place at the foot of the calendar. (Appeal from order of Onondaga Supreme Court— depositions.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Schnepp, Doerr and Witmer, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ithaka Acquisition Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 (the
"Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I Paul A. Brooke, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


By:  /s/ Paul A. Brooke                                   Dated: August 14, 2006
  ------------------------------------------
         Paul A. Brooke
         Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
         (Principal Executive Officer)
Commercial HVAC, WH, and Refrigeration Certification Working Group

Tuesday, April 30, 2013 Meeting

Agenda

9:00 – 9:15 Welcome

DOE Building Amenities, Security, etc.

9:15 – 9:30 Ethics Discussion

9:30 – 10:15 Introductions by the Working Group Members

10:15 – 10:30 Introduction of Facilitator 

Description of Negotiated Rulemaking

10:30 – 10:45 Break

10:45 – 12:15 Establishment of Ground Rules for the Negotiations

12:15 – 1:15 Lunch

1:15 – 4:30 Discussion of Rulemaking Objective and Scope of Negotiations

4:30 – 5:00 Development of Schedule for Negotiation Meetings

N.B.: June 26 – Progress Report to ASRAC

August 30 – Final Recommendation to ASRAC
----

----

|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));      and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: |  July      30, 2008 |   | /s/      CHRIS TONG |
|-------|--------------------------|--------|---------------------|

|   | CHRIS      TONG |
|--------|-----------------|

|   | Chief      Financial Officer |
|--------|------------------------------|

----
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 196 

To eliminate automatic pay adjustments for Members of Congress, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2013 

Mr. LATTA (for himself, Mrs. BLACK, Mr. MCKINLEY, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Ms. BORDALLO, Mr. LANCE, Mr. NUGENT, Mr. WITTMAN, Mr. 

MARCHANT, and Mr. LOEBSACK) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to 

the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be 

subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 

of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To eliminate automatic pay adjustments for Members of 

Congress, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF AUTOMATIC PAY ADJUST4 MENTS FOR MEMBERS OF CONGRESS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 601(a) 

6 of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 

7 31(2)) is repealed. 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•HR 196 IH

1 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Section 601(a)(1) 

2 of such Act is amended— 

3 (1) by striking ‘‘(a)(1)’’ and inserting ‘‘(a)’’; 

4 (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B), 

5 and (C) as paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), respectively; 

6 and 

7 (3) by striking ‘‘, as adjusted by paragraph (2) 

8 of this subsection’’. 

9 SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

10 This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall 

11 take effect on December 31, 2014. 

Æ 


pwalker on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with
Open Literature Review Screen Chemical Name: Atrazine CAS No: 1912-24-9 Citation: Lytle, J. S. and T. F. Lytle (2002). "Uptake and loss ofchlorpyrifos and atrazine by Juncus effusus L. in a mesocosm study with amixture ofpesticides." . Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 21(9): 1817-1825. 

## (V11te,P 4't(l.f, 

### (/21-) Date ofScreen: 08/21/09 Rationale for Not Conducting a Full Open Literature Review Summary: The study evaluates a mixture ofatrazine, chlorpyrifos, monosodium methanearsonate and monomethylmercury chloride as the active ingredient; data on the single atrazine active ingredient are notprovided. Primary Reviewer: Lisa Muto, StaffScientist, Cambridge Environmental Inc. Secondary Reviewer: Teri Myers, Senior Scientist, Cambridge Environmental Inc.



# 11.1.1.111 2087849
#### § 225.19 Program information.

Persons seeking information about this Program should contact their State administering agency or the appropriate FNSRO. The FNS website has contact information for State agencies at *https://www.fns.usda.gov/contacts* and FNSRO at *https://www.fns.usda.gov/fns-regional-offices.*

[88 FR 57850, Aug. 23, 2023]
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-00-00761-CR

Lewis Carl Hunt, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY, 22ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. CR-99-0041, HONORABLE CHARLES R. RAMSAY, JUDGE PRESIDING

Appellant Lewis Carl Hunt was placed on community supervision after being

convicted of two counts of aggravated assault. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 22.02 (West 1994). He

now appeals from an order revoking that supervision and imposing sentence of imprisonment for ten

years.

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is

frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable

grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d

807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v.

State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App.

1969). A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised of his right

to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.
2

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous

and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. Counsel’s

motion to withdraw is granted.

The order revoking community supervision is affirmed. 

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices B. A. Smith and Puryear

Affirmed

Filed: November 8, 2001

Do Not Publish
THIS AGREEMENT is dated for reference the 10th day of August, A.D. 2009.








BETWEEN:





Cascade Technologies Corp., a company incorporated in the State of Wyoming and having its offices at 1530-9th Avenue S.E., Calgary, Alberta T2G 0T7





(hereinafter referred to as the “Company”)





OF THE FIRST PART





AND:





Mel Dick, an individual with an address at Unit 1A – 215 Neave Road, Kelowna, B.C.  V1V 2L9





(hereinafter referred to as the “Creditor”)





OF THE SECOND PART





WHEREAS the Company is indebted to the Creditor and the Creditor is willing to accept certain assets of the Company, as detailed on Schedule A appended hereto,  in full and final settlement  of the indebtedness between the Company and the Creditor , subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth in settlement of the Company’s indebtedness to the Creditor.





NOW THEREFORE THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH that in consideration of the premises and of the mutual covenants hereinafter contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:





1.                      The Company confirms and acknowledges its indebtedness to the Creditor in an amount of $40,000.00 as of August 10, 2009, net of accrued interest, which accrued interest shall be included in this settlement amount (the “Indebtedness”).





2.                      The Creditor agrees to accept the assets as set forth on Schedule A appended hereto in full and final settlement of the Indebtedness.





3.                      Each of the parties hereto agrees to execute such further and other deeds, documents and assurances and do such further and other acts as may be necessary to carry out the true intent and meaning of this Agreement fully and effectually.





4.                      Time shall be of the essence of this Agreement.





5.                      This Agreement shall enure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto, their heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns.


1


IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.





CASCADE TECHNOLOGIES CORP.











By:/s/ Jacqueline Danforth





Witnessed by:





/s/  Mel Dick                                                                                                   /s/ H. Schneider


MEL DICK                                                                                                      Signature





H. Schneider


Name





Kelowna, B.C.


Address


2


SCHEDULE A




1.           All office furniture and fittings, including computer equipment, desks, chairs and all other office fittings purchased from the period starting February 2009 to current date and currently owned by the Company.
#### § 22.303 Cooperation with Federal Regional Councils.

States are urged to establish and maintain close and cooperative relationships with the Federal Regional Councils which will be in a position to assist the States and multicounty jurisdictions in the identification and application of available resources. States may authorize direct communications and liaison between the Regional Councils and multicounty jurisdictions within States.
#### SLOAN, Appellant, v. McKANE, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 5, 1906.)

Action by John Sloan against John McKane.

PER CURIAM.

Order modified by requiring the defendant to pay to the plaintiff or his attorney the sum of $1,500 as a condition of opening the default, instead of the sum of $250, and, as modified, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements to the appellant.

WOODWARD and MILLER, JJ., vote for affirmance.