alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 1948

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1948 appear at 80 FR 9888, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1948.97 Grant closing and fund disbursement.

Grant closing and fund disbursement will be accomplished in accordance with RD Instruction 1942-G.
FLN (Rev. 3/2007) Deficiency Order Page 1 of 1

3:95cr3041LAC - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA vs. DAVID STACEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs

DAVID STACEY

Case No.3:95cr3041LAC

ORDER

Your document, MOTION FOR REDUCTION OF SENTENCE pursuant to Title 18

U.S.C. 3582(c)(2), (Correction to Original Motion), was referred to the undersigned

with the following deficiencies:

The document does not have an original signature.

For these reasons, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk shall return the document to the

filing party.

DONE and ORDERED this 1st day of May, 2008.

s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:95-cr-03041-LC-SMN Document 125 Filed 05/01/08 Page 1 of 1
yearID roadTypeID rampFraction

2013 2 0.075008591 2013 4 0.117027776
**EXHIBIT32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with thequarterly report on Form 10-Q of Advanced Life Sciences Holdings, Inc.(the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2010 (the “Report”),I, John L. Flavin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 to the extent applicable; and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
|   | Date: May 10, 2010              |
|--------|--------------------------------------|
|   |                                 |
|   |                                 |
|   | /s/ John L. Flavin                   |
|   | John L. Flavin                       |
|   | Chief Financial Officer              |
|   | Advanced Life Sciences Holdings, Inc |

 

----
§ 220.5 Method of payment to States. Funds to be paid to any State for the School Breakfast Program shall be made available by means of Letters of Credit issued by FNS in favor of the State agency. The State agency shall: ( a ) Obtain funds needed for reimbursement to School Food Authorities through presentation by designated State officials of a payment Voucher on Letter of Credit in accordance with procedures prescribed by FNS and approved by the U.S. Treasury Department;
( b ) submit requests for funds only at such times and in such amounts, as will permit prompt payment of claims or authorized advances; and
( c ) use the funds received from such requests without delay for the purpose for which drawn.
[Amdt. 25, 41 FR 34759, Aug. 17, 1976]
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15** 
**- 2505** 

In re: NATURAL BORN CITIZEN PARTY NATIONAL COMMITTEE; HAROLD WILLIAM VAN ALLEN, Co

- Chairperson ,

Petitioner s
.

On Petition for Extraordinary Writ

. ( 1:13

- cv
- 00278

- L M B

- TCB )

Submitted : February 25, 2016 Decided: February 29, 2016

Before SHEDD and HARRIS , Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Harold William Van Allen , Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Howard William Van Allen petitions for an extraordinary
writ, seeking an order directing a variety of actions related to
the 2016 general election. * We conclude that V an Allen is not

entitled to the relief he seeks. Accordingly, we deny Van
Allen’s motion for certification to the Supreme Court and his
petition for an extraordinary writ . We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequat ely
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

* Van Allen, a pro se litigant, may not represent the interests of the Natural Born Citizen Party National Committee and its members, as he attempts to do. See Oxendine v. Williams , 509 F .2d 1405, 1407 (4th Cir. 1975). Accordingly, we consider Van Allen t o be the sole petitioner.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T LUZ ANA BE LI ES COBAR E NRI QU EZ , a. k. a. L uz A nabel i E sc ob arE nri qu e, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 11- 73287 A ge nc yN o. A 077- 981- 537 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o a r do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r19, 2012 ** B efo re: G O O D W IN , W A L L A C E , an dF IS H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. L uz A nabe l i E s c oba rE nr i que z , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of G ua t e m a l a , pe t i t i ons for r evi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order di sm i ss i ng her appe a l f r om a n i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s ( “ I J ” ) r e m ova l or de r . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on 

# FI LED DE C 21 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 73287 2 u n d er 8 U . S . C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e rev i ew d e n o v o cl ai m s o f du e p ro cess v i o l at i o n s, Sa ndoval-L un a v. Mukasey, 526 F . 3d 1243, 1246 ( 9th C i r . 2008) , a nd w e de nythe p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T h e B IA p ro p er ly d eterm in ed th at th e I J d idn o t v io late E sc o b arE n riq u ez ’s du e p r o c e s s r i g h t s b yf

a i l i n g t o a d v i s e h e rth a ts h e h a dar i g h tt o ap p l yf o ra s y l u m, w h e r e E s c o b a rE n r iq u e z n e v e re x p r e s s e daf e a rth a t s h e w o u ldb e h a rm e dif re turned t o G uat em al a, the re cord do es no totherw i se sugg es ta bas i s f or any s uch f e a r , a n dE s c o b a rE n r i q u e z h a dr e c e n t l yv o l u n t a r i l yr e tu rn e dt o Gu a t e m a l af o rtwo w e e k s . See V

alenci a v. Mukasey , 5 4 8 F .3 d1 2 6 1 , 1 2 6 2 - 6 3 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ) ( th e r e is n o r e q u ir e m e n t th a t an a lie n b e a d v is e do f th e a v a ilab ilityo f

a s y lu m w h e r e th e r e is n o ap p a r e n t e lig ib ilityf o rit) ; s e e a l

s o La ta v . I

NS , 20 4 F . 3d 12 41 , 12 46 (9th C i r. 20 00 ) ( re qu i ri ng error and prej ud i ce for adu e proces s c l ai m ). P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, February 25, 2010, 1 p.m. to February 25, 2010, 4 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on February 1, 2010, 75 FR 5092.                

The meeting will be held February 22, 2010, from 11 a.m. to 2 p.m. The meeting location remains the same.

The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: February 2, 2010.

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-2886 Filed 2-9-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.65


                        Summary Description of L.A. Gear, Inc.
                             1997 Employee Incentive Plan

In December 1996, the Board of Directors adopted and approved the 1997 Employee
Incentive Plan (the "Plan") for all full-time employees of the Company as well
as employees joining the Company after December 1, 1996 (on a pro-rata basis
commencing on the first day of the fiscal quarter following such employee's
commencement date).  The Plan combines equity and cash components and includes
incentives for all employees to assist the Company in its turnaround efforts.
The guaranteed cash award component is calculated as a fixed percentage of the
employees salary (ranging from 15% for the highest paid employees to 6% for
employees in the fourth tier), and vest one-half on May 31, 1997 and one-half on
November 30, 1997, except for vice president-level positions and above, which
vest in full on December 1, 1997; provided, in all cases, pro-rata portions of
awards shall vest on the elimination of the employee's position with the Company
prior to the vesting date. Stock option awards for all employees vest on
December 1, 1997.  No payout or vesting occurs if there is a termination of
employment due to voluntary resignation, death, disability or for cause.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Remarks by President Biden on the Supreme Court’s Decision on Affirmative Action      

# Resource: Remarks by President Biden on the Supreme Court’s Decision on Affirmative Action

In this speech, President Biden discusses the impacts of the Supreme Court decision against affirmative action on college admissions processes. He encourages colleges and universities to uphold a new standard of taking into account the adversity a student has overcome when selecting among qualified applicants.**Learn more.**
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 3:95cr03005/LAC

CARLOS MOSQUEDA,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER

Before the Court is Defendant’s response to the show cause order issued on June 25,

2008. Defendant emphasizes that he is not attempting to appeal from the Court’s Order of

March 31, 2008, denying his Motion to Reduce Sentence (doc. 290) but rather from the

Court’s Order of April 29, 2008, which denied his “Motion for Modification and/or

Recalculation of Sentence Pursuant to Title 18 USC § 3582(c)(2), Amendment 711” (doc.

292). Defendant’s Notice of Appeal (doc. 294) supports this assertion. Since the Notice of

Appeal was filed on May 7, 2008, it appears to have been timely filed.

As directed by the Eleventh Circuit, the Clerk is directed to return the file to the

Eleventh Circuit for further proceedings.

ORDERED on this 28th day of July, 2008.

 s/L.A. Collier 

Lacey A. Collier

Senior United States District Judge

Case 3:95-cr-03005-LC-EMT Document 306 Filed 07/28/08 Page 1 of 1
###### Editorial Note on Part 246

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 246 appear at 76 FR 35097, June 16, 2011.

#### § 246.28 OMB control numbers.

The following control numbers have been assigned to the information collection requirements in 7 CFR part 246 by the Office of Management and Budget pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, Pub. L. 96-511.

| 7 CFR part 246 section where requirements are described | Current OMB control no. |
| --- | --- |
| .4(a) (8), (9), (11) | 0584-0386 |
| .5 | 0584-0043 |
| .6 | 0584-0043 |
| .7(a) | 0584-0386 |
| .7(e), (h), (j) | 0584-0043 |
| .7(n) | 0584-0386 |
| .7(i) | 0584-A536 |
| .10 | 0584-A536 |
| .11(a)(3) | 0584-0386 |
| .11(d) | 0584-0043 |
| .12(f), (i), (i)(3), (j) | 0584-0043 |
| .14(d)(1) | 0584-0043 |
| .16(c) | 0584-0043 |
| .17(c)(1) | 0584-0043 |
| .19 | 0584-0043 |
| .20(a) | 0584-0043 |
| .25(a), (b) | 0584-0043, 0584-0347 |

[50 FR 6121, Feb. 13, 1985, as amended at 53 FR 15653, May 3, 1988; 54 FR 51295, Dec. 14, 1989; 58 FR 11507, Feb. 26, 1993]
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 14, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-10848 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus LARRY JOHN BALL, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:04-CR-373-ALL

-------------------- Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Larry John Ball has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Ball has not filed a response. Our independent review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
#### § 27.23 Duplicate sets of samples of cotton.

The duplicate sets of samples shall be inclosed in wrappers or containers separate and apart from the original sets in the manner prescribed or original samples in the foregoing section, except that the wrappers or containers shall be labeled or marked, or both, so as to show that they contain duplicate samples and shall be delivered to the person requesting the classification of the cotton.
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
      THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Chardan North China Acquisition
      Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending May 31, 2006
      (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof, I Li Zhang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, that:




1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and




2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.







By:
      /s/
      Li Zhang  Dated:
      May 15, 2006


-----------------------------------


Li
      Zhang


Chief
      Executive Officer


(Principal
      Executive Officer)


GT\6487139.4
 359907-2
§ 23.9 General. ( a ) Section 503(b)(2), title V, of the Rural Development Act of 1972 (Pub. L. 92-419) hereafter referred to as “Title V” authorizes funds to finance work authorized under title V which serve two or more States; in which universities in two or more States cooperate; or which is conducted by one University serving two or more States. The authorized funding under section 503(b)(2) is hereafter referred to as the “Regional Programs.”
( b ) The Regional Programs shall develop and provide knowledge essential to assist and support rural development in the region, and shall provide for technical consultation and personnel development for the research and extension staff in the several States of the region to help them to be more responsive to rural development needs and activities.
( c ) The Regional Programs will concentrate on the high priority knowledge, training, and personnel needs required for the research and extension staff in the several States to conduct effective rural development research and extension to carry out the provisions of title V. These efforts may include personnel development and consultation; synthesis of existing research knowledge and the interpretation of this knowledge for rural development program and policy purposes; the development of strategies and procedures on high priority rural development problems of regional significance; as funds permit, the conduct of research on one of two high priority problems for which information is lacking but is urgently needed for rural development, and the evaluation of rural development programs and policies.
( d ) Regional Programs will be consonant with all rural development activities under the Act and other pertinent Federal development programs. To effectuate such purpose, the Assistant Secretary for Conservation, Research and Education will implement title V plans and activities in close cooperation with the Assistant Secretary for Rural Development. In order to insure such consonance, the Director of each Regional Center will insure that regional programs having an impact within one or more States are brought to the attention of the appropriate State overall coordinator for consideration pursuant to procedures in § 23.4(c).
MEDIATION REFERRALS

2006-0268.

#### Seven Seventeen HB Philadelphia No. 2 v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision.

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2002-A-1925.

The following case has been returned to the regular docket pursuant to S.Ct.Prae.R. XIV(6)(E):
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of CKX, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert F.X. Sillerman, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|Dated: March 30, 2005 |  |     |  |                                                                                                                                
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | By: |  | /s/ROBERT F. X. SILLERMANRobert F. X. Sillerman
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

This
certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-KSB pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act,
be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form with the
electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
#### § 1957.1 General.

Pursuant to the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1986, Public Law 99-509, the Rural Housing Service (RHS) sold certain of the portfolio of loans made under section 502 of the Housing Act of 1949 to the Rural Housing Trust, 1987-1. The sale was without recourse to RHS except for certain provisions providing for RHS's payment of interest credit amounts and agreement to compensate the Rural Housing Trust 1987-1 for future cash flow changes due to revised borrowers rights as set forth in RHS regulations. The sale documents to Rural Housing Trust 1987-1 recognize that the RHS loans were assigned subject to rights provided to these borrowers under documentation to recognize the rights of RHS borrowers under regulations of RHS as they may exist from time to time and to service the loans in accordance with then current RHS regulations. In addition, as provided in § 1957.6 of this subpart, RHS has retained review, but not hearing authority under the RHS Appeal Procedure, 7 CFR part 1900, Subpart B. Failure of private servicers to comply with RHS regulations in servicing loans sold to the Rural Housing Trust 1987-1 may be redressed in the review process under the Appeal Procedure.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>          5
<MULTIPLIER>       1
       
<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>            DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>		     JAN-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                 DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                       41,339
<SECURITIES>                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                9,996
<ALLOWANCES>                 0
<INVENTORY>                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>             78,983
<PP&E>                       19,471
<DEPRECIATION>               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>               109,054
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>        1,062,799
<BONDS>                      1,500,000
<COMMON>                     186,311
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>        475,982
<PREFERRED>                  1,875
<OTHER-SE>                   (3,117,913)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY> 109,054  
<SALES>                      43,091
<TOTAL-REVENUES>             66,573 
<CGS>                        23,198
<TOTAL-COSTS>                23,198
<OTHER-EXPENSES>             4,743
<LOSS-PROVISION>             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>           171,112
<INCOME-PRETAX>              (776,873)
<INCOME-TAX>                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>          (776,873)
<DISCONTINUED>               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>              0
<CHANGES>                    0
<NET-INCOME>                 (776,873)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                (.04) 
        

</TABLE>