Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 222 / Thursday, November 18, 2010 / Notices 70699 

inspections adequately using its own 

staff located at its recognized site(s). 

Accordingly, OSHA would continue to 

deny use of such a program, or 

withdraw its prior approval to use such 

a program, when it determines that a 

NRTL/applicant is not testing, 

evaluating, and performing inspections 

adequately using its own staff located at 

its recognized site(s). 

Additional Condition 

As described above, while QPS has 

testing and evaluation procedures, 

OSHA could not review how QPS has 

implemented them because QPS has not 

used them for testing and certifying 

products under the program. In 

addition, as also described above, while 

QPS has factory-inspection procedures, 

it currently does not conduct regular 

factory inspections. Some of these 

testing- and factory-inspection 

procedures are newly developed by 

QPS. Therefore, OSHA also must review 

the effectiveness of QPS’s testing and 

evaluation procedures, and its factoryinspection program should OSHA grant 

NRTL recognition to QPS, and do so 

within a reasonable period after granting 

recognition. Consequently, OSHA 

proposes to recognize QPS 

conditionally, i.e., subject to a later 

determination of the effectiveness of 

these procedures. OSHA would include 

these conditions in the final notice 

should OSHA recognize QPS as a NRTL. 

These conditions apply solely to QPS’s 

operations as a NRTL, and solely to 

those products that it certifies for 

purposes of enabling employers to meet 

OSHA product-approval requirements. 

These conditions would be in addition 

to all other conditions that OSHA 

normally imposes in its recognition of 

an organization as a NRTL. 

Imposing these conditions is 

consistent with OSHA’s past recognition 

of certain organizations as NRTLs that 

met the basic recognition requirements, 

but needed to further refine or 

implement their procedures (for 

example, see 63 FR 68306, 12/10/1998, 

and 65 FR 26637, 05/08/2000). Given 

the applicant’s current activities in 

testing and certification, OSHA is 

confident that QPS will properly 

perform its activities in the areas noted 

above. 

Therefore, the following conditions 

would apply should OSHA recognize 

QPS under the NRTL Program: 

Within 30 days of certifying its first 

products under the NRTL Program, QPS will 

notify the OSHA NRTL Program Director of 

this activity so that OSHA may schedule its 

first audit of QPS. At this first audit of QPS, 

QPS must demonstrate that it properly 

conducted testing, review, and evaluation, 

and factory inspections, and, for inspections, 

did so at the frequency set forth in the 

applicable NRTL Program policy. 

Preliminary Finding on the Application 

QPS submitted an acceptable 

application for recognition as a NRTL. 

OSHA’s review of the application file 

and the results of the on-site review 

indicate that QPS can meet the 

requirements prescribed by 29 CFR 

1910.7 for recognition to use the test 

standards listed above. This preliminary 

finding does not constitute an interim or 

temporary approval of the application. 

QPS corrected the discrepancies noted 

by OSHA during the on-site review, and 

these corrections are described in its 

response to the on-site review report 

(NA). 

Following examination of the 

application file and the on-site review 

report, the NRTL Program staff 

concluded that OSHA can grant the 

applicant recognition as a Nationally 

Recognized Testing Laboratory for its 

Toronto, Ontario, facility, subject to the 

conditions described above. The staff, 

therefore, recommended preliminarily 

that the Assistant Secretary approve the 

application. 

OSHA welcomes public comment as 

to whether QPS meets the requirements 

of 29 CFR 1910.7 for recognition as a 

Nationally Recognized Testing 

Laboratory. Comments should consist of 

pertinent written documents and 

exhibits. Commenters needing more 

time to comment must submit a request 

in writing, stating the reasons for the 

request. OSHA must receive the written 

request for an extension by the due date 

for comments. OSHA will limit any 

extension to 30 days unless the 

requester justifies a longer period. 

OSHA may deny a request for an 

extension if it is not adequately 

justified. To obtain or review copies of 

the publicly available information in 

QPS’s application and other pertinent 

documents (including exhibits), and all 

submitted comments, contact the Docket 

Office, Room N–2625, Occupational 

Safety and Health Administration, U.S. 

Department of Labor, at the above 

address; these materials also are 

available online at http:// 

www.regulations.gov under Docket No. 

OSHA–2010–0046. 

The NRTL Program staff will review 

all comments submitted to the docket in 

a timely manner, and, after addressing 

the issues raised by these comments, 

will recommend whether to grant NRTL 

recognition to QPS. The Assistant 

Secretary will make the final decision 

on granting NRTL recognition, and, in 

making this decision, may undertake 

other proceedings prescribed in 

Appendix A to 29 CFR 1910.7. OSHA 

will publish a public notice of this final 

decision in the Federal Register. 

Authority and Signature 

David Michaels, PhD, MPH, Assistant 

Secretary of Labor for Occupational 

Safety and Health, 200 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210, 

directed the preparation of this notice. 

Accordingly, the Agency is issuing this 

notice pursuant to Sections 6(b) and 8(g) 

of the Occupational Safety and Health 

Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 655 and 657), 

Secretary of Labor’s Order No. 4–2010 

(75 FR 55355), and 29 CFR part 1911. 

Signed at Washington, DC on this 15th day 

of November 2010. 

David Michaels, 

Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational 

Safety and Health. 

[FR Doc. 2010–29125 Filed 11–17–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–26–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Notice of Determinations Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 

U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor 

herein presents summaries of 

determinations regarding eligibility to 

apply for trade adjustment assistance for 

workers by (TA–W) number issued 

during the period of November 1, 2010 

through November 5, 2010. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for workers of 

a primary firm and a certification issued 

regarding eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(a) of the Act must be met. 

I. Under Section 222(a)(2)(A), the 

following must be satisfied: 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) The sales or production, or both, 

of such firm have decreased absolutely; 

and 

(3) One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

(A) Imports of articles or services like 

or directly competitive with articles 

produced or services supplied by such 

firm have increased; 

(B) Imports of articles like or directly 

competitive with articles into which one 

or more component parts produced by 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

70700 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 222 / Thursday, November 18, 2010 / Notices 

such firm are directly incorporated, 

have increased; 

(C) Imports of articles directly 

incorporating one or more component 

parts produced outside the United 

States that are like or directly 

competitive with imports of articles 

incorporating one or more component 

parts produced by such firm have 

increased; 

(D) Imports of articles like or directly 

competitive with articles which are 

produced directly using services 

supplied by such firm, have increased; 

and 

(4) The increase in imports 

contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation and to the decline in the 

sales or production of such firm; or 

II. Section 222(a)(2)(B) all of the 

following must be satisfied: 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

(A) There has been a shift by the 

workers’ firm to a foreign country in the 

production of articles or supply of 

services like or directly competitive 

with those produced/supplied by the 

workers’ firm; 

(B) There has been an acquisition 

from a foreign country by the workers’ 

firm of articles/services that are like or 

directly competitive with those 

produced/supplied by the workers’ firm; 

and 

(3) The shift/acquisition contributed 

importantly to the workers’ separation 

or threat of separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected workers in public agencies and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(b) of the Act must be met. 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the public agency have 

become totally or partially separated, or 

are threatened to become totally or 

partially separated; 

(2) The public agency has acquired 

from a foreign country services like or 

directly competitive with services 

which are supplied by such agency; and 

(3) The acquisition of services 

contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected secondary workers of a firm and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(c) of the Act must be met. 

(1) A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the workers’ firm have 

become totally or partially separated, or 

are threatened to become totally or 

partially separated; 

(2) The workers’ firm is a Supplier or 

Downstream Producer to a firm that 

employed a group of workers who 

received a certification of eligibility 

under Section 222(a) of the Act, and 

such supply or production is related to 

the article or service that was the basis 

for such certification; and 

(3) Either— 

(A) The workers’ firm is a supplier 

and the component parts it supplied to 

the firm described in paragraph (2) 

accounted for at least 20 percent of the 

production or sales of the workers’ firm; 

or 

(B) A loss of business by the workers’ 

firm with the firm described in 

paragraph (2) contributed importantly to 

the workers’ separation or threat of 

separation. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for adversely 

affected workers in firms identified by 

the International Trade Commission and 

a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 222(f) 

of the Act must be met. 

(1) The workers’ firm is publicly 

identified by name by the International 

Trade Commission as a member of a 

domestic industry in an investigation 

resulting in— 

(A) An affirmative determination of 

serious injury or threat thereof under 

section 202(b)(1); 

(B) An affirmative determination of 

market disruption or threat thereof 

under section 421(b)(1); or 

(C) An affirmative final determination 

of material injury or threat thereof under 

section 705(b)(1)(A) or 735(b)(1)(A) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 

1671d(b)(1)(A) and 1673d(b)(1)(A)); 

(2) The petition is filed during the 1- 

year period beginning on the date on 

which— 

(A) A summary of the report 

submitted to the President by the 

International Trade Commission under 

section 202(f)(1) with respect to the 

affirmative determination described in 

paragraph (1)(A) is published in the 

Federal Register under section 202(f)(3); 

or 

(B) Notice of an affirmative 

determination described in 

subparagraph (1) is published in the 

Federal Register; and 

(3) The workers have become totally 

or partially separated from the workers’ 

firm within— 

(A) The 1-year period described in 

paragraph (2); or 

(B) Notwithstanding section 223(b)(1), 

the 1-year period preceding the 1-year 

period described in paragraph (2). 

Affirmative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The date following the company 

name and location of each 

determination references the impact 

date for all workers of such 

determination. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the 

Trade Act have been met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

73,933 ............... Exide Technologies, SLI Division; Leased Workers Adecco Employment Services and Countrywide, etc.Reading, PA ............................... April 14, 2009. 

74,358 ............... PW Hardwood, LLC ........................................................................ Brookville, PA ............................. June 23, 2009. 

74,630 ............... Federal-Mogul Corporation ............................................................. Boyertown, PA ............................ September 13, 2009. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production or 

services) of the Trade Act have been 

met. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 222 / Thursday, November 18, 2010 / Notices 70701 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

73,875 ............... TechTeam Global, Inc., Leased Workers Human Capital Staffing, 

LLC, K–Force, Accountstemps, etc.

Southfield, MI ............................. April 2, 2009. 

74,365 ............... Sigue Corporation, Formerly Known As Envios El CID, Inc ........... Glendale, CA .............................. June 28, 2009. 

74,601 ............... Motorola, Inc., Motorola Mobility, Inc.; Mobility Division, etc .......... Horsham, PA .............................. September 3, 2009. 

74,619 ............... Sematic USA, Inc., Sematic Group ................................................. Twinsburg, OH ........................... August 16, 2009. 

74,649 ............... DSTystems, Inc., Leased Workers from Comsys Information 

Technology Services, Megaforce, etc.

Kansas City, MO ........................ September 21, 2009. 

74,688 ............... PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Internal Firm Services, IT Services, Leased Workers Infosys, Comsys, etc.Tampa, FL .................................. September 30, 2009. 

74,688A ............ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Internal Firm Services, IT Services, Leased Workers Infosys, Comsys, etc.Sacramento and San Jose, CA September 30, 2009. 

74,688B ............ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Internal Firm Services, IT Services, Leased Workers Infosys, Comsys, etc.Washington, DC ......................... September 30, 2009. 

74,688C ............ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Internal Firm Services, IT Services, Leased Workers Infosys, Comsys, etc.Atlanta, GA ................................. September 30, 2009. 

74,688D ............ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Internal Firm Services, IT Services, Leased Workers Infosys, Comsys, etc.Chicago, IL ................................. September 30, 2009. 

74,688E ............ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Internal Firm Services, IT Services, Leased Workers Infosys, Comsys, etc.Boston, MA ................................. September 30, 2009. 

74,688F ............. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Internal Firm Services, IT Services, Leased Workers Infosys, Comsys, etc.Detroit, MI ................................... September 30, 2009. 

74,688G ............ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Internal Firm Services, IT Services, Leased Workers Infosys, Comsys, etc.Florham Park and Jersey City, 

NJ.

September 30, 2009. 

74,688H ............ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Internal Firm Services, IT Services, Leased Workers Infosys, Comsys, etc.Melville, NY ................................ September 30, 2009. 

74,688I .............. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Internal Firm Services, IT Services, Leased Workers Infosys, Comsys, etc.Dallas, TX ................................... September 30, 2009. 

74,691 ............... Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation, Shared Services Division ... Jacksonville, FL .......................... September 29, 2009. 

74,734 ............... Chrysler Group, LLC, Trenton Engine Plant ................................... Trenton, MI ................................. December 17, 2010. 

74,736 ............... Universal Lighting Technologies, Inc., Regional Distribution Center.Lincoln Park, NJ ......................... October 14, 2009. 

74,752 ............... Morse Automotive Corporation, Warehousing Operations Division Chicago, IL ................................. November 5, 2010. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(c) (supplier to a firm whose workers 

are certified eligible to apply for TAA) 

of the Trade Act have been met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

74,419 ............... Huntington Foam, LLC, Brockway Branch, Leased Workers from 

Manpower.

Brockway, PA ............................. July 14, 2009. 

Negative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, the 

investigation revealed that the eligibility 

criteria for worker adjustment assistance 

have not been met for the reasons 

specified. 

The investigation revealed that the 

criteria under paragraphs (a)(2)(A)(i) 

(decline in sales or production, or both) 

and (a)(2)(B) (shift in production or 

services to a foreign country) of section 

222 have not been met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

74,333 ............... Quantumplus Limited Partnership, dba Tabs Direct, Inc., Subsidiary of RAPP.Irving, TX ....................................

The investigation revealed that the 

criteria under paragraphs(a)(2)(A) 

(increased imports) and (a)(2)(B) (shift 

in production or services to a foreign 

country) of section 222 have not been 

met. 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

73,457 ............... Hayes-Lemmerz International, Commercial Highway, Inc .............. Akron, OH ...................................

73,764 ............... Amazon.com, Amazon Mobile Engineering Team .......................... Seattle, WA ................................

74,342 ............... International Paper Company ......................................................... Jonesboro, AR ............................

74,370 ............... Boulder Community Hospital ........................................................... Boulder, CO ................................

74,595 ............... Connect North America U.S.A., Inc., Black Diamond Financial 

Corporation, Inc.

Presque Island, ME ....................

74,622 ............... Southwest AMT, Inc., Advanced Machine and Tool Corporation ... McAllen, TX ................................

74,656 ............... Providence Washington Insurance Solutions, LLC, Information 

Technology.

East Providence, RI ...................

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

70702 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 222 / Thursday, November 18, 2010 / Notices 

TA–W No. Subject firm Location Impact date 

74,684 ............... World Color (USA), LLC, Quad-Graphics, Inc ................................ Clarksville, TN ............................

I hereby certify that the 

aforementioned determinations were 

issued during the period of November 1, 

2010 through November 5, 2010. Copies 

of these determinations may be 

requested under the Freedom of 

Information Act. Requests may be 

submitted by fax, courier services, or 

mail to FOIA Disclosure Officer, Office 

of Trade Adjustment Assistance (ETA), 

U.S. Department of Labor, 200 

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 

DC 20210 or tofoiarequest@dol.gov. 

These determinations also are available 

on the Department’s Web site at 

http://www.doleta.gov/tradeact under 

the searchable listing of determinations. 

Dated: November 12, 2010. 

Michael W. Jaffe, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. 2010–29093 Filed 11–17–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Occupational Safety and Health 

Administration 

[Docket No. OSHA–2010–0045] 

Advisory Committee on Construction 

Safety and Health (ACCSH) 

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health 

Administration (OSHA), Labor. 

ACTION: Announcement of a meeting of 

the Advisory Committee on 

Construction Safety and Health 

(ACCSH) and ACCSH Work Group 

meetings. 

SUMMARY: ACCSH will meet December 9 

and 10, 2010 in Washington, DC. In 

conjunction with the ACCSH meeting, 

ACCSH Work Groups will meet 

December 7 and 8, 2010. 

DATES:

ACCSH: ACCSH will meet from 8 a.m. 

to 4 p.m., Thursday, December 9, 2010, 

and from 8 a.m. to noon, Friday, 

December 10, 2010. 

ACCSH Work Groups: ACCSH Work 

Groups will meet Tuesday, December 7, 

and Wednesday, December 8, 2010. (For 

Work Group meeting times and 

locations, see the Work Group Schedule 

information in the SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION section of this notice.) 

Written comments, requests to speak, 

speaker presentations, and requests for 

special accommodation: Comments, 

requests to address the ACCSH meeting, 

written or electronic speaker 

presentations, and requests for special 

accommodations for the ACCSH and 

ACCSH Work Group meetings must be 

submitted (postmarked, sent, 

transmitted) by November 24, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: ACCSH and ACCSH Work 

Group: ACCSH and ACCSH Work Group 

meetings will be held in Room N–3437 

A–C, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington 

DC 20210. 

Submission of comments, requests to 

speak, and speaker presentations: 

Interested persons may submit 

comments, requests to speak at the 

ACCSH meeting, and speaker 

presentations using any one of the 

following methods: 

Electronically: You may submit 

materials, including attachments, 

electronically at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, which is the 

Federal eRulemaking Portal. Follow the 

on-line instructions for submissions or 

comments. 

Facsimile (Fax): If your submission, 

including attachments, does not exceed 

10 pages, you may fax it to the OSHA 

Docket Office at (202) 693–1648. 

Mail, hand delivery, express mail, 

messenger, or courier service: You may 

submit a copy of your comments, 

request to speak, and speaker 

presentation to the OSHA Docket Office, 

Docket No. OSHA–2010–0045, Room N– 

2625, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 

Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, 

DC 20210; telephone (202) 693–2350 

(TTY (877) 889–5627). Deliveries (hand 

deliveries, express mail, messenger, and 

courier service) are accepted during the 

Department of Labor’s and OSHA 

Docket Office’s normal business hours, 

8:15 a.m.-4:45 p.m., e.t., weekdays. 

Because of security-related procedures, 

submissions by regular mail may 

experience significant delays. 

Requests for special accommodations: 

Please submit requests for special 

accommodation to attend the ACCSH 

and ACCSH Work Group meetings to 

Ms. Veneta Chatmon, OSHA, Office of 

Communications, Room N–3647, U.S. 

Department of Labor, 200 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210; 

telephone (202) 693–1999; e-mail 

chatmon.veneta@dol.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For press inquiries: Ms. MaryAnn 

Garrahan, OSHA, Office of 

Communications, Room N–3647, U.S. 

Department of Labor, 200 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210; 

telephone (202) 693–1999. 

For general information about ACCSH 

and ACCSH meetings: Mr. Francis 

Dougherty, OSHA, Directorate of 

Construction, Room N–3468, U.S. 

Department of Labor, 200 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210; 

telephone (202) 693–2020; e-mail 

dougherty.francis@dol.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

ACCSH Meeting 

ACCSH will meet Thursday, 

December 9, 2010, and Friday, 

December 10, 2010, in Washington DC. 

The meeting is open to the public. 

ACCSH is authorized to advise the 

Secretary of Labor and Assistant 

Secretary of Labor for Occupational 

Safety and Health (Assistant Secretary) 

in the formulation of standards affecting 

the construction industry and on policy 

matters arising in the administration of 

the safety and health provisions under 

the Contract Work Hours and Safety 

Standards Act (Construction Safety Act) 

(40 U.S.C. 3701 et seq.) and the 

Occupational Safety and Health Act of 

1970 (29 U.S.C. 651 et seq.)(see also 29 

CFR 1911.10 and 1912.3). 

The agenda topics for this meeting 

include: 

• Welcome/Remarks from the Office 

of the Assistant Secretary; 

• Remarks from the Directorate of 

Construction; 

• Mast Climbing Work Platform 

presentation; 

• Update on the Injury and Illness 

Prevention Program rulemaking; 

• Update on the Severe Violator 

Enforcement Program; 

• Update on Cooperative and State 

Programs; 

• Work Group Reports, Work Group 

and Committee Administration; 

• Public Comment Period. 

ACCSH meetings are transcribed and 

detailed minutes of the meetings are 

prepared. The transcript and minutes 

are placed in the public docket for the 

meeting. The docket also includes 

ACCSH Work Group reports, speaker 

presentations, comments, and other 

materials and requests submitted to the 

Committee. 

ACCSH Work Group Meetings 

In conjunction with the ACCSH 

meeting, the following ACCSH Work 

Groups will meet December 7–8, 2010: 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES