alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 1948
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1948 appear at 80 FR 9888, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1948.90 Land transfers. ( a ) Transfers of real property acquired by Rural Development. ( 1 ) A request for Rural Development acquisition of real property by a Governor of a State constitutes an agreement by that State to receive said real property and to reimburse Rural Development for the fair market value of said real property for the intended use.
( 2 ) Terms and conditions, including reimbursement terms, for real property transfers shall be set forth in a Real Property Transfer Agreement between the Under Secretary for Rural Development and the appropriate Governor. These terms and conditions will be agreed upon by Rural Development and the State prior to Rural Development attempting to acquire the property. These agreements shall be prepared after consulting with OGC, and forwarded for prior approval by the Rural Development National Office.
( 3 ) All funds from real property transfers received by Rural Development shall be deposited in the U.S. Treasury.
( b ) Transfer of real property acquired and/or developed with grant funds from a grant made under this subpart to a person. ( 1 ) Real property acquired and/or developed under this subpart may be transferred to a person for the purposes of construction of privately-owned housing.
( 2 ) All transfers of real property to a person must be approved by the Rural Development State Director of the appropriate State.
( 3 ) Transfer of real property by a recipient of assistance under this subpart to a person must be by contract which: acknowledges the use of funds provided under this subpart to acquire or develop the site; specifies the date of performance prior to delivery of the deed; provides for Rural Development concurrence before changes or modifications; and assures Rural Development that the real property will be used for the purposes under which the grant was made.
( 4 ) Proceeds derived from the sale of land acquired or developed through the use of a grant provided under this subpart must be divided between the grantee and Rural Development on a pro rata basis. A grantee may not recover its cost from sale proceeds to the exclusion of Rural Development. The amount to be returned to Rural Development is to be computed by applying the percentage of the Rural Development grant participation in the total cost of the project to the proceeds from the sale.
( 5 ) All funds received by Rural Development from real property transfers shall be deposited in the U.S. Treasury.
(42 U.S.C. 8401; delegation of authority by the Secretary of Agriculture, 7 CFR 2.23; delegation of authority by the Assistant Secretary for Rural Development, 7 CFR 2.70)
[44 FR 35984, June 19, 1979, as amended at 46 FR 33022, June 26, 1981; 56 FR 28038, June 19, 1991; 68 FR 61331, Oct. 28, 2003]
#### Dillon *vs.*Wright.

jREFLviN. Case 4.

Appeal from the Owen Circuit: Thomas M. Hickey, Judge.

*Replevin. When maintainable. Possession. Restitution. Time. Statute of limitation.*

November 3.

Chief Justice Robertson,

deliverer» the opinion of the Court.

This is an action of replevin, which was once before in this court, and was remanded to the circuit court for further proceedings. (See IY. J. J. Marshall 354) On the return of the case to the circuit court, the defendant in error, amended his cognisance by averring that T. B. Dilh n the defendant in the execution, was,when it was levied, in the possession of the male slave, holding him on hire .for a term that had not then expired ; and was, and had been, for more than five years, in the possession of the female slave, *claiming her as his own.*A demurrer to the cognisance having been overruled, and the plaintiff having failed to reply, a judgment of *retorno habendo*was rendered.

The only question now presented is, whether or not the facts averred in the cognisance, are sufficient *11to shew that the plaintiff had no right to mantain an action of replevin?

To maintain repievi,,. nlt’f must have h.a!l possos-• p,°o!,ei° v or the right to tho possession nn(j the taking moat have been ile§a ‘

Replevin will ”°nfflprof°<nty held adverse-y to plaintiff,

*Sanders*for appellant.

As to the male slave, if T. B. Dillon held him by a contract ot hire, and the term had not expired, the pi ant iff had no right to his action of replevin— 1st. Because, if the plantiff was the bailor, as he had not a right *to*immediate restitution, replevin in his name would not lie. 2d. If the slave had' been hired of another person, not holding under the plaintiff, T. B Dillon must have held him adversely the plaintiff; and therefore this action is not maintaiiiable. It is not material whether the slave was subject to the execution or not; because, even if he wf,re not subject, the plaintiff cannot mantain réplevui for him, unless *he*was in possession, or had a right to the possession of him at the date of the caption; for in order to mantain replevin, the tar king must he illegal, and the party complaining, must, at that time, have been entitled *to the*immediate possession. 1- Chitty Pleading, on 159.

As to the female slave, allhough the averments in the cognizance, may not shew necessarily, that she was subject to execution, they show that the plaintiff cannot maintain the action ; because if, as alledged, T B. Dillon was in the possession of her, claiming her as his own, that possession must he deemed adverse to the claim *of the*plaintiff; and therefore, he cannot mantain the action of replevin in his own name.

*If the*plaintiff *be*entitled *to the*slaves, or either of them, he might, if he shall have been injured by the levy or sale, obtain reparation in an appropriate action. Yet replevin is not that action, if the facts averred be true.

Wherefore the judgment is affirmed.
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1436.12 Interest and fees. ( a ) Loans will bear interest at the rate equivalent, as determined by CCC, to the rate of interest charged on Treasury securities of comparable term and maturity on the date the loan is initially approved.
( b ) The interest rate for each loan will remain in effect for the term of the loan.
( c ) Each borrower on a loan application must pay a non-refundable application fee in such amount determined appropriate by CCC; the fee will be not less than $100 per borrower. The loan application fee is determined based on the cost of the fees associated with the loan, including, but not limited to, the cost to CCC for lien searches, security filings, and credit reports.
( d ) For sugar storage facility loans, paragraph (c) of this section does not apply.
[73 FR 41591, Aug. 18, 2009]
§ 25.622 Other considerations. ( a ) *Civil rights compliance requirements.* All grants made under this subpart are subject to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 7 CFR part 1901, subpart E.
( b ) *Environmental review requirements.* Grants made under this subpart must comply with environmental review requirements in accordance with 7 CFR part 1970.
( c ) *Other USDA regulations.* This program is subject to the provisions of the following regulations, as applicable: ( 1 ) 2 CFR part 400, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards;
( 2 ) 2 CFR part 415, General Program Administrative Regulations;
( 3 ) 2 CFR part 416, General Program Administrative Regulations for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments;
( 4 ) 2 CFR part 417, Nonprocurement Debarment and Suspension;
( 5 ) 2 CFR part 418, New Restrictions on Lobbying;
( 6 ) 2 CFR part 421, Requirements for Drug-Free Workplace (Financial Assistance); and
( 7 ) 2 CFR part 422, Research Institutions Conducting USDA-Funded Extramural Research; Research Misconducts.
[67 FR 13558, Mar. 25, 2002, as amended at 81 FR 11025, Mar. 2, 2016; 85 FR 31938, May 28, 2020]
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.40

  CASH COMPENSATION FOR NON-MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR OF ASPECT MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.

      No Director who also serves as an employee receives separate compensation
for services rendered as a director. Below is a summary of cash compensation
that we pay to our non-employee directors:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
      TYPE OF FEE                                AMOUNT        FOR EACH
      -----------                                ------        --------
<S>                                           <C>              <C>
      Annual retainer                         $    10,000      Year of service

      Audit Committee Chair                   $     8,000      Year of service

      Compensation Committee Chair            $     4,000      Year of service

      Corporate Governance and Nominating
          Committee Chair                     $     4,000      Year of service

      Attendance                              $     1,500      Board meeting attended in person

                                              $       500      Board meeting attended by conference telephone
                                              $     1,000      Audit committee meeting attended in person

                                              $       500      Audit committee meeting attended by conference
                                                                   telephone
                                              $     1,000      Compensation committee meeting attended in person

                                              $       500      Compensation committee meeting attended by conference
                                                                   telephone
                                              $     1,000      Corporate governance and nominating committee meeting
                                                                   attended in person
                                              $       500      Corporate governance and nominating committee meeting
                                                                   attended by conference telephone
</TABLE>

      Aspect also reimburses non-employee directors for reasonable travel and
out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with their service as directors.
Swanson, Brian (OST) 

. From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Brian, 

Bruce Anthony <boa@offices4u.com> 

Friday, August 10, 2012 10:50 PM 

Swanson, Brian (OST) 

Skywest to serve Brainerd 

.13 

As a user of the· Brained Regional Airport, I would like to encourage you to chose Skywest as the new 

carrier. 

Thank you. 

Bruce Anthony 

Distinguished Engineer 

IBM 

Sent from my Motorola ATRIXTM 4G on AT&T 

1
98-1925.

#### State v. Wharf.

Warren App. No. CA97-08-087. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue stated at pages 1-2 of the court of appeals’ Entry Granting Motion to Certify filed August 19,1998:

> “The above cause is before the court pursuant to a motion to certify conflict filed by counsel for appellant, Stephen M. Wharf, on June 17, 1998. The motion contends that this court’s decision in the above case conflicts with the decisions of four appellate districts, *ie., State v. Anthony*(Sept. 30, 1994), Lake App. No. 93-L-096, unreported [1994 WL 587882]; *State v. Gulley*(June 17, 1992), Summit App. No. 15137, unreported [1992 WL 140006]; *State v. Steel*(Oct. 21, 1997), Defiance App. No. 4-96-29, unreported [1997 WL 661108]; and *State v. Westbrook*(Sept. 23, 1992), Licking App. No. 92-CA-2, unreported [1992 WL 307874],

> “Upon due consideration of the foregoing, the court finds that its decision is in conflict with the above four cases and that the motion to certify should be GRANTED. The issue for certification is whether R.C. 2901.21(B) requires the particular robbery element, codified in R.C. 2911.02(A)(1), ‘[h]ave a deadly weapon on or about the offender’s person or under the offender’s control,’ to be committed with the mens rea of recklessness.”
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                                    ------


                                    FORM 8-K


                                 CURRENT REPORT



                     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934



Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): October 17, 1997


                       NL INDUSTRIES, INC.
      (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)



New Jersey                   1-640                    13-5267260
(State or other       (Commission File No.)     (Employer ID No.)
jurisdiction of
incorporation)



16825 Northchase Dr., Suite 1200, Houston, Texas             77060
(Address of principal executive offices)                   (Zip Code)



Registrant's telephone number, including area code   (281) 423-3300


                          Not Applicable
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)




<PAGE>

Item 5.     Other Events.


      On October 17, 1997,  the  Registrant  issued the press  release  attached
hereto  as  Exhibit  99.1  and  incorporated  herein  in its  entirety  by  this
reference.




Item 7.     Financial Statements, Pro Forma Financial Information and
            Exhibits.


      (c)   Exhibits

            (i)   Exhibit 99.1.     Press Release dated October 17, 1997.



                        *      *      *      *      *




                                    SIGNATURE



      Pursuant to the  requirements of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


                                          NL INDUSTRIES, INC.
                                          (Registrant)



                                          /s/ Dennis G. Newkirk      
                                          Dennis G. Newkirk
                                          Vice President & Controller



Dated: October 20, 1997



<PAGE>
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsCommunication overhead on the Intel iPSC-860 hypercubeExperiments were conducted on the Intel iPSC-860 hypercube in order to evaluate the overhead of interprocessor communication. It is demonstrated that: (1) contrary to popular belief, the distance between two communicating processors has a significant impact on communication time, (2) edge contention can increase communication time by a factor of more than 7, and (3) node contention has no measurable impact.Document ID19900013666Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsBokhari, Shahid H.*(University of Engineering and Technology Lahore, Pakistan)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMay 1, 1990Subject CategoryComputer Operations And HardwareReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-182055NAS 1.26:182055ICASE-IR-10AD-A227204Accession Number90N22982Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS1-18605Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900013666.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
**EXHIBIT 32.1** **CERTIFICATION    OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Commercial    Lines Inc. (the “Company”) on    Form 10-Q    for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the    Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the    “Report”), I, Mark R. Holden, Chief Executive    Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.    § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    result of operations of the Company. /s/  Mark    R. Holden    Mark R. Holden
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1992 Engrossed in House (EH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1992

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To amend the requirements relating to assessment of Israel's 
    qualitative military edge over military threats, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Israel QME Enhancement Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO ASSESSMENT OF ISRAEL'S 
              QUALITATIVE MILITARY EDGE OVER MILITARY THREATS.

    (a) Assessment Required; Reports.--Section 201 of Public Law 110-
429 (122 Stat. 4843; 22 U.S.C. 2776 note) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``an ongoing basis'' and 
        inserting ``a biennial basis''; and
            (2) in subsection (c)(2)--
                    (A) in the heading, by striking ``Quadrennial'' and 
                inserting ``Biennial''; and
                    (B) in the text, by striking ``Not later than four 
                years after the date on which the President transmits 
                the initial report under paragraph (1), and every four 
                years thereafter,'' and inserting ``Not later than one 
                year after the date of the enactment of the Israel QME 
                Enhancement Act, and biennially thereafter,''.
    (b) Report.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 90 days after the date of 
        the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State shall submit 
        to the appropriate congressional committees a report on--
                    (A) the range of cyber and asymmetric threats posed 
                to Israel by state and non-state actors; and
                    (B) the joint efforts of the United States and 
                Israel to address the threats identified in 
                subparagraph (A).
            (2) Form.--The report required under paragraph (1) shall be 
        submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified 
        annex.
            (3) Appropriate congressional committees defined.--In this 
        subsection, the term ``appropriate congressional committees'' 
        means the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of 
        Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the 
        Senate.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 11, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
113th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 1992

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

     To amend the requirements relating to assessment of Israel's 
    qualitative military edge over military threats, and for other 
                               purposes.
```
First Amendment to the 1999 Non-Qualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan



 Exhibit 10.60 
  
 FIRST AMENDMENT 
 TO THE 
 BOSTON PROPERTIES, INC. 
 1999 NON-QUALIFIED EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN 
  
 The Boston Properties, Inc. 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby amended as follows: 
  

	1.	Section 7 is hereby amended by deleting the first sentence thereof in its entirety and substituting therefor the following sentence: 

  
 “If a Participant is an Eligible Employee through the end of a Purchase
Period, the balance which remains credited to his or her Account at the end of such Purchase Period automatically shall be applied in full to purchase Stock as of the next business day following the end of such Purchase Period at the Purchase Price
for such Stock for such Purchase Period.” 
  

	2.	Except as so amended, the Plan in all other respects, is hereby confirmed. 

  
 Executed this 17th
day of August,1999. 
  

			
	BOSTON PROPERTIES, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Robert E. Burke
#### Sylvia Dutka, Appellant, v Solomon Dutka, Respondent.

— In an action for divorce, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated November 13, 1978, as (1) denied her requests for exclusive possession of the marital home, an order of protection and an interim counsel fee, and (2) awarded her only $300 per week as temporary alimony. Order modified, by deleting therefrom the provision which awarded plaintiff $300 per week as temporary alimony, and substituting therefor a provision awarding plaintiff $500 per week as temporary alimony. As so modified, order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements to plaintiff. The temporary alimony was inadequate to the extent indicated herein. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Rabin and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

DEBORAH DUROSS GUIBORD , Appellant,

v.

GUARDIANSHIP OF KATHLEEN DUROSS FORD , Appellee.

No. 4D2023

- 1070

[ July 11, 2024 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Laura Johnson, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2018

- GA

- 000542

- XXXX

- NB

.
Harriet Rae Freeman and James R. Merola of Merola & Freeman, P.A., Palm Beach Gardens , and Sonia E. O ’ Donnell, Robert A. O ’ Donnell, and Donald E. Christopher of O’D onnell Christopher LLP, Miami Springs, and Jefferson P. Knight of The Knight Law Firm, Miami, for appellant.

Kara Rockenbach Link of Link & Rockenbach, P

. A

. , West Palm Beach

, and F. Gregory Barnhart and Jack Scarola of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shi pley, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

K LINGENSMITH , C.J., M AY and D AMOORGIAN , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
§ 247.14 Other public assistance programs. ( a ) *What information on other public assistance programs must the local agency provide to applicants?* The local agency must provide applicants with written information on the following programs, and make referrals, as appropriate: ( 1 ) Supplemental security income benefits provided under Title XVI of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1381 *et seq.*);
( 2 ) Medical assistance provided under Title XIX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396 *et seq.*), including medical assistance provided to a qualified Medicare beneficiary (42 U.S.C. 1395(p) and 1396d(5)); and
( 3 ) The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (7 U.S.C. 2011 *et seq.*).
( b ) *Is the value of CSFP benefits counted as income or resources for any other public assistance programs?* No. The value of benefits received in CSFP may not be considered as income or resources of participants or their families for any purpose under Federal, State, or local laws, including laws relating to taxation and public assistance programs.
[70 FR 47063, Aug. 11, 2005, as amended at 79 FR 38751, July 9, 2014; 85 FR 68721, Oct. 30, 2020]