alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 221 (Wednesday, November 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 70262]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28954]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals To Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or To Acquire Companies That Are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than December 3, 2010.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (E. Ann Worthy, Vice President) 
2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Family Bancorp, San Antonio, Texas, to engage de novo in lending 
activities pursuant to section 225.28(b)(1) of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 12, 
2010.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-28954 Filed 11-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MA Y 21, 2015

NO. 03

- 13

- 00403

- CR

Joseph Timothy Shimko, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PEMBERTO N, FIELD, AND BOURLA ND

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction r en d ered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment . Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction

.

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1956

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1956 appear at 80 FR 9901, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1956.96 Delinquent adjustment agreements.

A 90-day extension for making the payments may be given by the Agency when the circumstances of the case justify an extension. A decision not to extend the time for making payments is not appealable. If the debtor is delinquent under the terms of the adjustment agreement and is likely to be financially unable to meet the terms of the agreement, the Agency may cancel the existing agreement and process a different type of settlement more consistent with the debtor's repayment ability, provided the facts in the case justify such action. The cancellation of an adjustment agreement is appealable. If an agreement is cancelled, any payments received shall be retained as payments on the debt owed at the time of the adjustment agreement.

[68 FR 7700, Feb. 18, 2003]
Exhibit
32.1











CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of IR BioSciences Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael Wilhelm, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




IR
      BIOSCIENCES HOLDINGS, INC.Date: 
      September 25, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Michael K.
      WilhelmMichael
      K. WilhelmPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, an other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Editorial Note on Part 1940
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1940 appear at 80 FR 9876, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1940.951 General. This subpart sets forth Rural Development policies and procedures for the delivery of certain rural development programs under a rural economic development review panel established in eligible States authorized under sections 365, 366, 367, and 368 of the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act (7 U.S.C. 1921 *et seq.*), as amended. ( a ) If a State desires to participate in this pilot program, the Governor of the State may submit an application to the Under Secretary for Small Community and Rural Development, U.S. Department of Agriculture, room 219-A, Administration Building, Washington, DC 20250 in accordance with § 1940.954 of this subpart.
( b ) The Under Secretary shall designate not more than five States in which to make rural economic development review panels applicable during any established time period for the purpose of reviewing and ranking applications submitted for funding under certain rural development programs. The following time periods have been established for participation in this pilot program: First period—Balance of fiscal year (FY) 1992 to September 30, 1993; Second period—October 1, 1993 to September 30, 1994; Third period—October 1, 1994 to September 30, 1995; and Fourth period—October 1, 1995 to September 30, 1996.
The State will be bound by the provisions of this pilot program only during the established time period(s) for which the State is designated. If a designated State does not remain an eligible State during the established time period(s) for which the State was designated, the State will not be eligible to participate in this program and cannot revert to the old ranking and applicant selection process.
( c ) Assistance under each designated rural development program shall be provided to eligible designated States for qualified projects in accordance with this subpart.
( d ) Federal statutes provide for extending Rural Development financially supported programs without regard to race, color, religion, sex, national origin, marital status, age, familial status, or physical/mental handicap (provided the participant possesses the capacity to enter into legal contracts.)
ARTICLE II

                            MEETINGS OF SHAREHOLDERS

Section 2.        Annual Meeting

                  The annual  meeting of  shareholders  shall be held on the 3rd
Tuesday in June of each year, if not a legal  holiday,  and, if a legal holiday,
then on the next business day thereafter, or on such date as shall be determined
by   the  Board  of  Directors,  and  the  shareholders  shall  then  elect
a Board of Directors and transact such other business as may properly be brought
before the meeting.  To be properly  brought before an annual meeting,  business
must be (a) specified in the notice of meeting (or any supplement thereto) given
by, at the direction of or upon authority granted by the Board of Directors, (b)
otherwise  brought  before the meeting by, at the direction of or upon authority
granted by the Board of  Directors,  or (c)  subject to ARTICLE  II,  Section 10
hereof,  otherwise  properly  brought before the meeting by a  shareholder.  For
business to be properly  brought before an annual meeting by a shareholder,  the
shareholder must have given timely notice thereof in writing to the Secretary of
the  Company.  To be timely,  a  shareholder's  notice  must be  received at the
principal  executive  offices of the Company not less than 60 days nor more than
90 days prior to the meeting;  provided,  however,  that, in the event that less
than 70 days'  notice of the date of the  meeting is given to  shareholders  and
public  disclosure of the meeting date,  pursuant to a press release,  is either
not made or is made less than 70 days prior to the meeting date,  then notice by
the  shareholder  to be timely must be so  received  not later than the close of
business  on the tenth day  following  the  earlier of (a) the day on which such
notice of the date of the annual meeting was mailed to  shareholders  or (b) the
day on which any such public disclosure was made.
                
                  A  shareholder's  notice to the Secretary must set forth as to
each matter the  shareholder  proposes to bring before the annual  meeting (a) a
brief  description  of the  business  desired  to be  brought  before the annual
meeting, and the reasons for conducting such business at the annual meeting, (b)
the name and address,  as they appear on the Company's books, of the shareholder
proposing such business, (c) the class and number of shares of the Company which
are beneficially owned by the shareholder,  and (d) any material interest of the
shareholder  in such  business.  Notwithstanding  anything in the By-Laws to the
contrary,  but subject to ARTICLE II,  Section 10 hereof,  no business  shall be
conducted at an annual  meeting  except in accordance  with the  procedures  set
forth in this Section 2. The Chairman of an annual meeting  shall,  if the facts
warrant,  determine  and declare to the meeting  that  business was not properly
brought before the meeting in accordance  with the provisions of this Section 2,
and, if he should so determine, he shall so declare to the meeting, and any such
business not properly brought before the meeting shall not be transacted.
Editorial Note on Part 246
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 246 appear at 76 FR 35097, June 16, 2011.

§ 246.21 Investigations. ( a ) *Authority.* The Department may make an investigation of any allegation of noncompliance with this part and FNS guidelines and instructions. The investigation may include, where appropriate, a review of pertinent practices and policies of any State or local agency, the circumstances under which the possible noncompliance with this part occurred, and other factors relevant to a determination as to whether the State or local agency has failed to comply with the requirements of this part.
( b ) *Confidentiality.* No State or local agency, participant, or other person shall intimidate, threaten, coerce, or discriminate against any individual for the purpose of interfering with any right or privilege under this part because that person has made a complaint or formal allegation, or has testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing under this part. The identity of every complainant shall be kept confidential except to the extent necessary to carry out the purposes of this part, including the conducting of any investigation, hearing, or judicial proceeding.
|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                        |   |   |                                             |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|
| By:              /s/ Kerry              Propper                                                                                        |   |   | Dated:              August 21,              2006 |
|                                                                                                                                             |   |   |                                                  |
| Kerry                PropperChief                Financial Officer and Secretary(Principal                Accounting and Financial Officer) |   |   |                                             |
§ 1900.154 Determining the need for special handling. The State Director (or Administrator, under § 1900.153(e) or § 1900.155(a) of this subpart): ( a ) [Reserved]
( b ) Determines whether the reported relationship or association is defined in § 1900.152 of this subpart and would violate the provisions of § 1900.151(a) of this subpart,
( c ) - ( f ) [Reserved]
###### Editorial Note on Part 1944

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1944 appear at 80 FR 9885, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1944.72 Application packaging orientation and training.

Agency approval officials will orient and train organizations on how to package. A newspaper advertisement will be published by Agency offices serving designated counties and/or colonias after October 1. The advertisement will announce that application packaging services are being requested and specify the date of the certification training. All eligible organizations may attend this training. This date will be no more than 30 days after the advertisement appears in the newspaper and no later than December 31 of any year. The advertisement will include the estimated number of packages needed by loan type, *i.e.*, Single Family, Multi-Family, etc. Exhibit A of this subpart (available in any Agency office) is an example of an appropriate advertisement. “Certificates of Training” as required under § 1944.53 of this subpart will be signed by the State Director and given after completion of the training. Efforts will be made by the appropriate Agency office to complete this training process and certify packagers as quickly as possible. Grantees must attend this training each year in order to qualify for assistance.

[58 FR 58643, Nov. 3, 1993, as amended at 61 FR 39851, July 31, 1996]
#### § 1950.101 Purpose.

Borrowers with accounts serviced by the Rural Development who have entered or who are entering military service will require special treatment. This subpart prescribes the authorities, policies, and routines for servicing such cases in addition to those contained in other Rural Development regulations. This subpart is inapplicable to Farm Service Agency, Farm Loan Programs.

[45 FR 43152, June 26, 1980, as amended at 72 FR 64122, Nov. 15, 2007; 80 FR 9890, Feb. 24, 2015]
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Candela Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending June 29, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, F. Paul Broyer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

/s/
F. Paul Broyer

---

F. Paul Broyer
Chief Financial Officer
September 26, 2003

---

QuickLinks
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENSACOLA DIVISION 

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCTS 

LIABILITY LITIGATION 

Case No. 3:19md2885 

This Document Relates to: 

Vilsmeyer, 7:20cv113

Judge M. Casey Rodgers 

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones

REFERRAL AND ORDER 

Referred to Judge M. Casey Rodgers on: May 13, 2022 

Motion/Pleadings: Plaintiff’s Consent Motion to Extend Time to Submit Bill of 

Costs Through Appeal 

Filed by: Plaintiff on May 13, 2022 ECF. # 147 

 Stipulated Joint Pleading 

 Unopposed X Consented 

 JESSICA J. LYUBLANOVITS 

 CLERK OF COURT 

 /s/ Donna Bajzik 

 Deputy Clerk: Donna Bajzik 

 

On consideration, the motion is GRANTED, as requested. Plaintiff’s bill of 

costs is due 14 days after the conclusion of any appeal from the final judgment. 

DONE and ORDERED this 17th day of May, 2022. 

 

M. CASEY RODGERS 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 7:20-cv-00113-MCR-GRJ Document 148 Filed 05/17/22 Page 1 of 1
###### Editorial Note on Part 1940

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1940 appear at 80 FR 9876, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1940.971 Delegation of authority.

The authority authorized to the State Director in this subpart may be redelegated.
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 32.1

                  Certification of Principal Executive Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


In connection with the Annual Report of News Communications, Inc. ("NCI") on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James A.
Finkelstein, President and Chief Executive Officer of NCI, certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.


/s/ James A. Finkelstein
------------------------
James A. Finkelstein

Chief Executive Officer

Date: April 13, 2004
MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

98-357.

#### State ex rel. Snyder v. Cunningham.

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relator’s application for dismissal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

JIMI P. MCDONALD,

Inmate No. 1269570,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 3:20cv1918-MCR-EMT

DR. JAMES HOWELL, et al.,

Defendants.

__________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge’s 

Report and Recommendation dated February 4, 2020. ECF No. 4. Plaintiff has been 

furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to 

file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have 

made a de novo determination of all timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed 

objections thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be 

adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted 

and incorporated by reference in this Order.
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:20cv1918-MCR-EMT

2. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under 

28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 3rd day of March 2020.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 20 (Thursday, January 30, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 4885]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-02024]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

Time and Date: Wednesday, February 5, 2014, 9 a.m.-11 a.m.

Place: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East-West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

Status: Commission Meeting--Open to the Public.

Matters to be Considered: Briefing Matter: Infant Stroller Final Rule 
(Sec. 104).
    A live webcast of the Meeting can be viewed at www.cpsc.gov/live.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East-West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: January 28, 2014.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-02024 Filed 1-28-14; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 95-40876

Summary Calendar

_____________________

MYRON C. DAGLEY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CITY OF COLLINSVILLE, TEXAS, ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:95-CV-73

_________________________________________________________________ August 22, 1996

Before JOLLY, JONES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Myron C. Dagley appeals the grant of summary judgment for the

defendants-appellees in his civil rights suit ari sing from his

arrest and the impoundment of his vehicles on November 23, 1994.

Dagley does not challenge the district court’ s imposition of-2-

sanctions. Therefore, any such issue is deemed abandoned on

appeal. See Eason v. Thaler , 14 F.3d 8, 9 n.1 (5th Cir. 1994).

We have reviewed the record and the appellate briefs, and we

find no error in the district court’s grant of summary judgment.

Dagley’s argument concerning judicial bias by the district court is

without merit. S ee Liteky v. United States

, 114 S.Ct. 1147,

1157-58 (1994). Dagley’s appeal is without arguable merit and thus

frivolous. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. The appeal is DISMISSED.

The defendants-appellees represented by Mr. James C. Tidwell

move for sanctions pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 38. In the light of

the frivolousness of the appeal, the frivolous documents filed by

Dagley that purport to transfer this appeal, and Dagley’s failure

to heed our direction given in Dagley v. Rutherford

, No. 95-40903,

slip op. at 2 (5th Cir. May 8, 1996), to review all pending appeals

to ensure that they are not frivolous, the motion for sanctions is

GRANTED. Mr. Tidwell and counsel for D.F.P., L.C., d/b/a Frank’s

Body Shop, are directed to submit, within 20 days, an itemized list

of appellate costs an d attorney’s fees for this court’s

determination of the monetary sanction.

Finally, IT IS ORDERED that Dagley is directed to show cause,

within 20 days, why the defendants-appellees should not be awarded

attorney’s fees and costs in this appeal.-3-

A PPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS IMPOSED, WITH DIRECTION TO THE

LITIGANTS.