alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1900.151 General. ( a ) The Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch requires the maintenance of high standards of honesty, integrity, and impartiality by employees. To reduce the potential for employee conflict of interest, any processing, approval, servicing or review activity, including access through automated information systems, is conducted only by authorized Rural Development employees who: ( 1 ) Are not themselves the recipient.
( 2 ) Are not members of the family or known close relatives of the recipient.
( 3 ) Do not have an immediate working relationship with the recipient, the employee related to the recipient, or the employee who would normally conduct the activity.
( 4 ) Do not have a business or close personal association with the recipient.
( b ) No provision of this subpart takes precedence over individual program requirements or restrictions relating to eligibility for Rural Development assistance to Rural Development employees, members of families of employees, close relatives, or business or close personal associates of employees.
( c ) The determination of a case's need for special handling under the provisions of this subpart is not an adverse action and, therefore, is not subject to appeal.
( d ) The provisions of this subpart do not apply to the Farm Service Agency. The relevant regulations applicable to the Farm Service Agency can be found at 5 CFR parts 2635 and 8301.
[58 FR 224, Jan. 5, 1993, as amended at 71 FR 38979, July 11, 2006; 80 FR 9867, Feb. 24, 2015]
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Datawatch Corporation (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Murray
      P. Fish, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








/s/
                Murray P. Fish
              Murray
                P. Fish
              Chief Financial Officer
              December
                31, 2007
(January 10, 1980)

#### National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa., Respondent, v Clear-Vu Packing, Inc., Appellant.

— Appeal from order, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered on August 27, 1979, withdrawn. No opinion. Concur — Birns, J. P., Sandler, Sullivan, Markewich and Yesawich, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1924

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1924 appear at 80 FR 9870, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1924.262 Handling complaints involving dwellings constructed by the self-help method.

When a borrower whose dwelling was constructed by the self-help method complains about construction defects, Rural Development will determine whether the defect is the result of work performed by a contractor or work performed by the borrower under the guidance of the self-help group. Defects which are determined to be the responsibility of a contractor will be handled in accordance with § 1924.259 of this subpart. Defects determined to be the result of work performed by the borrower are not eligible for compensation under this subpart.
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of China Natural Resources, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Wong Wah On Edward, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Wong Wah On Edward

Wong Wah On Edward

Chief Executive Officer

April 30, 2018

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 1789.151 Definitions.

As used in this part:

*Administrator* means the Administrator of the Rural Utilities Service (RUS).

*Application* means a request for financial assistance under the RE Act or such other approvals as may be required of the RUS pursuant to the terms of outstanding loan or security instruments or otherwise.

*Borrower* means any organization which has an outstanding loan(s) made or guaranteed by RUS or its predecessor agency, the Rural Electrification Administration (REA) under the RE Act or any organization which has submitted or submits an Application before RUS.

*Consultant* means a person or firm which has been retained pursuant to this subpart under a contract to provide financial, legal, engineering, environmental, or other technical advice and services.

*Consultant Contract* means a contract for the performance of consulting services for RUS, to be paid using funds provided by a Borrower, which may be in the form of a Retainer Contract, purchase order, or other form as may be appropriate.

*Escrow Account* means an account established pursuant to § 1789.158.

*Escrow Agreement* means an agreement, between a Borrower, a Consultant and a Third-party Commercial Institution, meeting the requirements of § 1789.167.

*Final Invoice* means the closing Invoice prepared for a given Task Order.

*Financial Consultant* means a Consultant retained pursuant to this part to provide financial advisory services.

*Funding Agreement* means an agreement, between a Borrower and a Consultant, providing for the Borrower to fund the costs of a Task Order and otherwise meeting the requirements of § 1789.166.

*Indemnification Agreement* means an agreement by a Borrower meeting the requirements of § 1789.162.

*Invoice* means an invoice prepared by a Consultant pursuant to the terms of a Consultant Contract.

*Legal Consultant* means any Consultant retained pursuant to this part to provide legal services to RUS.

*Notice of Proposal to Fund* means a notice meeting the requirements of § 1789.156 provided to RUS by the Borrower.

*Organizational conflict of interest* means that because of other activities or relationships with other persons, a person is unable or potentially unable to render impartial assistance or advice to the Government, or the person's objectivity in performing the contract work is or might be otherwise impaired, or a person has an unfair competitive advantage.

*Retainer Contract* means a Consultant Contract providing for a minimum required payment to a Consultant irrespective of whether services are utilized by RUS thereunder.

*Task Order* means a written request for consultant services pursuant to the terms of a Consultant Contract.

*Third-party Commercial Institution* means a commercial financial institution mutually acceptable to the Borrower and the Consultant.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6904

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MORRIS EUGENE HAYES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District

Judge. (CR-94-163-2-20)

Submitted: August 28, 2003 Decided: September 10, 2003

Before NIEMEYER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Morris Eugene Hayes, Appellant Pro Se. Laura P. Tayman, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Morris Eugene Hayes appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his motion to reconsider his sentence. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.

Hayes, No. CR-94-163-2-20 (E.D. Va. Apr. 11, 2003). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 222 (Thursday, November 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 70738]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29031]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

 [Docket No. ER11-1946-000]


Gulf Oil Limited Partnership; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

November 8, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Gulf Oil Limited Partnership's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is November 29, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4b0d0e190804252722252e183e3b3b24393f0b2d2e3928652c243d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5c1a190e1f1332303532390f292c2c332e281c3a392e3f723b332a">[email protected]</span></a> or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-29031 Filed 11-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 1774.8 Other Federal Statutes. Other Federal statutes and regulations are applicable to grants awarded under this part. These include but are not limited to: ( a ) 7 CFR part 1, subpart A—USDA implementation of Freedom of Information Act.
( b ) 7 CFR part 3—USDA implementation of OMB Circular No. A-129 regarding debt collection.
( c ) 7 CFR part 15, subpart A—USDA implementation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended.
( d ) 7 CFR part 1970.
( e ) 7 CFR part 1901, subpart E—Civil Rights Compliance Requirements.
( f ) 2 CFR part 200, as adopted by USDA through 2 CFR part 400, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal.
( g ) 2 CFR part 415—General Program Administrative Requirements.
( h ) 2 CFR part 180, as adopted by USDA through 2 CFR part 417, Nonprocurement Debarment and Suspension, implementation of Executive Order 12549 on debarment and suspension.
( i ) 2 CFR part 418, New Restrictions on Lobbying, prohibiting the use of appropriated funds to influence Congress or a Federal agency in connection with the making of any Federal grant and other Federal contracting and financial transactions.
( j ) 2 CFR part 421, Requirements for Drug-Free Workplace (Financial Assistance), implementing the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 (41 U.S.C 8102).
( k ) 7 CFR part 15b, USDA implementation of section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794), as amended, prohibiting discrimination on the basis of physical or mental handicap in Federally assisted programs.
[75 FR 35963, June 24, 2010, as amended at 79 FR 76005, Dec. 19, 2014; 81 FR 7696, Feb. 16, 2016; 81 FR 11028, Mar. 2, 2016]
#### § 1786.61 Other prepayments.

RUS loan documentation generally permits borrowers to prepay RUS Notes by paying the outstanding balance due thereon. Nothing in this subpart shall prohibit any borrower from prepaying its outstanding RUS Notes in accordance with the terms thereof. The provisions of this subpart shall not be applicable to such prepayment.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CANDELA CORPORATION**

 

**Certification Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of Candela Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for theperiod ending June 28, 2008 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gerard E. Puorro, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Gerard E. Puorro     |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Gerard  E. Puorro        |   |
| Chief  Executive Officer |   |
| October 27,  2008   |   |

 

----
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Resource: Evidence-Based Treatments for Anxiety Disorders in Youth      

# Resource: Evidence-Based Treatments for Anxiety Disorders in Youth

This distance learning video, presented by the Technical Assistance Network for Children's Behavioral Health, explores the criteria for juvenile anxiety disorders, how they differ from adult anxiety disorders, the evidence-based treatments for juvenile anxiety disorders, and the differential diagnoses. Mental health practitioners, professionals who work with youth, policymakers, and families can use this video to learn how to recognize anxiety disorders in youth, identify the right treatment, and support young people in recovery.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJTlXy4nLMA&feature=youtu.be&utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=Resources
#### LANE et al. v. EQUITABLE LIFE ASSUR. SOC. OF UNITED STATES et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

November 16, 1906.)

Appeal from Special Term. Action by Lillie Lane and others against the Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States and W. Morton Garden, individually and as executor of George W. Kidd, deceased. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, the latter defendant appeals. Affirmed. Charles C. Dickinson, for appellant. Abel E. Blackmar (F. S. Fisher, on the brief), for respondents.

WOODWARD, J.

All of the questions involved in this appeal were necessarily disposed of on demurrer (Lane v. Equitable Life Assurance Society, 102 App. Div. 625, 92 N. Y. Supp. 1131), excepting the delivery of the assignment_ of the policy of insurance involved in the litigation; this question being raised by the answer interposed after the decision of the demurrer. Upon this point there is no lack of evidence to support the decision of the court at Special Term, and the judgment appealed from should therefore be affirmed, with costs. All concur.
#### In the Matter of Religious Society of Families, Appellant, v Assessor of the Town of Carroll et al., Respondents.

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from an order dismissing its application pursuant to section 421 (subd 1, par [a]) of the Real Property Tax Law seeking exemption of its real property from taxes. The property consists of approximately 335 acres of land located in Chautauqua County, about 25 acres of which are used for farming. The land is improved with two or three dwelling houses and barns, one of which is occupied by Calvin of Oakknoll, the founder and leader of petitioner, and his wife, Mary of Oakknoll. They farm the land and use the crops solely to support themselves. At one time there was another family living on the subject property but they were "excommunicated”. Subdivision 1 of section 421 of the Real Property Tax Law sets forth two basic tests which must be satisfied before an owner of real property is entitled to exemption (see, also, *Mohonk Trust v Board of Assessors of Town of Gardiner,*47 NY2d 476). The *1005first is that the owner of the land be "organized or conducted” exclusively, or primarily, for an exempt purpose, in this case a religious purpose. We agree with Trial Term that petitioner was not organized for a religious purpose. The "interim constitution” of petitioner does not set forth traditional or recognized theological principles, only the scientific or sociological principles of eugenics, ecology, population controls and land-use control. While these principles may be laudable, they do not relate to traditional concepts of religious tenets. Nor is petitioner associated "with an organized religious denomination or with an organization having as its avowed purpose the furthering of a recognized religion” (see *Matter of Swedenborg Foundation v Lewisohn,*40 NY2d 87, 94). On the contrary, its leader expressly disavows conventional religion. Petitioner also fails the second test, that the property be used exclusively for religious purposes. On this record the primary use of the property is as a homestead for Calvin and Mary of Oakknoll. There has been only brief and incidental contact with other persons and the property has not been utilized to further any religious precept. Moreover, one tenet of petitioner is that the land be divided into parcels and distributed to its members for their use as a homestead, from which they would derive their livelihood. Thus, petitioner’s argument for exemption is defeated by its own principle that the real property is for the personal use of its members (see *Matter of Presbyterian Residence Center Corp. v Wagner, 66*AD2d 998, 999, affd 48 NY2d 885). (Appeal from order of Chautauqua Supreme Court—assessment review.) Present—Simons, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Callahan, Doerr and Moule, JJ. [73 Misc 2d 923.]