alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of China Natural Resources, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I,Wong Wah On Edward, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Wong Wah On Edward

Wong Wah On Edward

Chief Financial Officer

April 27, 2012

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAn Investigation of Flame Spread over Shallow Liquid Pools in Microgravity and Nonair EnvironmentsExperiments of interest to combustion fundamentals and spacecraft fire safety investigated flame spread of alcohol fuels over shallow, 15 cm diameter pools in a 5.2 sec free-fall, microgravity facility. Results showed that, independent O2 concentration, alcohol fuel, and diluent types, microgravity flame spread rates were nearly identical to those corresponding normal-gravity flames for conditions where the normal gravity flames spread uniformly. This similarity indicated buoyancy-related convection in either phase does not affect flame spread, at least for the physical scale of the experiments. However, microgravity extinction coincided with the onset conditions for pulsating spread in normal gravity, implicating gas phase, buoyant flow as a requirement for pulsating spread. When the atmospheric nitrogen was replaced with argon, the conditions for the onset of normal-gravity pulsating flame spread and microgravity flame extinction were changed, in agreement with the expected lowering of the flash point through the thermal properties of the diluent. Helium-diluted flames, however, showed unexpected results with a shift to apparently higher flash-point temperatures and high normal gravity pulsation amplitudes.Document ID19900004364Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsRoss, Howard D.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Sotos, Raymond G.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1989Subject CategoryMaterials ProcessingReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:102425E-8363E-5190NASA-TM-102425Meeting InformationMeeting: International Symposium on CombustionLocation: OrleansCountry: FranceStart Date: July 22, 1990End Date: July 27, 1990Sponsors:Orleans Univ.Accession Number90N13680Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 674-22-05Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900004364.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In the Interest of A.L.P., a Child

Appellate case number: 01-19-00144-CV

Trial court case number: 18-DCV-252443

Trial court: 505th District Court of Fort Bend County

Proceeding pro se, appellant, C.J.M., has filed a notice of appeal of the trial court’s 

final decree of termination. Appellant’s brief initially was due on April 29, 2019. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 28.4(a), 38.6(a). And, we extended the time for filing appellant’s brief to 

June 3, 2019, with no extensions absent extraordinary circumstances. Appellant has filed 

a motion for an extension of time to file his brief. We grant the motion. Appellant’s 

brief is due no later than MONDAY, JULY 1, 2019. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(d).

Because this appeal involves the termination of the parent-child relationship, this 

Court is required to bring the appeal to final disposition no later than August 26, 2019, so 

far as reasonably possible. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2, reprinted in Tex. Gov’t. Code 

Ann., tit. 2, subtit. F app. Accordingly, no further extensions of time will be granted.1

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __June 11, 2019__

 

1

“Pro se litigants are held to the same standards as licensed attorneys and must comply 

with all applicable and mandatory rules of pleading and rules of procedure.” Morris v. 

Am. Home Mortg. Serv., Inc., 360 S.W.3d 32, 36 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2011, 

no pet.); see Mansfield State Bank v. Cohn, 573 S.W.2d 181, 184–85 (Tex. 1978); Green

v. Fed. Nat’l Mortg. Ass’n, No. 01-18-00258-CV, 2019 WL 1716347, at *2 (Tex. App.—

Houston [1st Dist.] Apr. 18, 2019, no pet. h.).
|  |  |  | GETTYSBURG |
|--|--|--|------------|
#### In re Thomas J. RYAN, Debtor. Entrust NPL Corp, Plaintiff, v. Winchester Global Trust Company Limited, as Trustee of the Settlement Trust, the Tax Lien Trust, the Factored Receivables Trust and the High-Yield Trust, Greenberg Traurig, P.A. as Custodian of Records pursuant to Court Order dated May 19, 2005, and Marika Tolz, Trustee of the Bankruptcy Estate of Thomas J. Ryan, Defendants.

Bankruptcy No. 02-22260-BKC-JKO.

Adversary No. 06-1401-JKO.

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida, Fort Lauderdale Division.

Dec. 19, 2007.

*276Reggie David Sanger, Esq., Ft. Lauder-dale, FL, for Plaintiff.

James P.S. Leshaw, Esq., Miami, FL, for PlaintiffDefendants.

Scott M. Grossman, Esq., Miami, FL, John A. Moffa, Esq., Sunrise, FL, for Defendants.

*ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CERTIFICATION OF DIRECT APPEAL TO THE COURT OF APPEALS*

JOHN K. OLSON, Bankruptcy Judge.

This adversary proceeding is before me on Plaintiff Entrust Corporation’s request [DE 79] that I certify under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d)(2) for direct appeal to the Court of Appeals Entrust’s appeal from my Order [DE 58] which dismissed this adversary proceeding with prejudice. Defendant Winchester Global Trust Company responded [DE 80] with a jurisdictional objection which I conclude I am required to sustain.

Entrust argues that a direct appeal makes sense and would be judicially economical in light of the current appeal pending in the Court of Appeals in the main bankruptcy case *In re Thomas J. Ryan, III,*which involves issues closely related to the issues in the appeal in this adversary proceeding. However logical this argument may be, I am constrained by the express provisions in the enactment of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (“BAPCPA”) which provides that BAPCPA’s provisions, with limited and irrelevant exceptions, “shall not apply with respect to cases commenced under title 11, United States Code, before the effective date of this Act.” BAPCPA § 1501(a) (uncodified). Prior to the enactment of § 158(d)(2) in BAPCPA, there was no provision for direct appeal of bankruptcy court orders to the Court of Appeals.

Although the direct appeal provision of new § 158(d)(2) is procedural in nature, and would ordinarily apply retroactively, where Congress has made clear that statutory provisions are not to be given retroactive effect, the normal presumption of retroactivity is overcome. *Christo v. Padgett,*223 F.3d 1324, 1332 (11th Cir.2000). Although this adversary proceeding was filed in 2006, the *case*in which it arises, *In re Thomas J. Ryan, III,*was filed March 28, 2002, well before BAPC-PA’s effective date of October 17, 2005. I therefore conclude that I am powerless to authorize a direct appeal to the Court of Appeals under § 158(d)(2). *In re McKinney,*457 F.3d 623 (7th Cir.2006); *Futch v. Roberts,*2007 WL 2462636 (S.D.Ga.2007).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff Entrust Corporation’s request [DE 79] that I certify its appeal from my Order [DE 58] which dismissed this adversary proceeding with prejudice for direct appeal to the Court of Appeals pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d)(2) is DENIED.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2108 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to provide information to 

foster youth on their potential eligibility for Federal student aid. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 22, 2013 

Mr. LEWIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to provide 

information to foster youth on their potential eligibility 

for Federal student aid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Foster Youth Higher 

5 Education Opportunities Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INFORMING FOSTER YOUTH OF THEIR POTENTIAL 

7 ELIGIBILITY FOR FEDERAL STUDENT AID. 

8 Section 483 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 

9 U.S.C. 1090) is amended by adding at the end the fol10 lowing: 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2108 IH

1 ‘‘(i) INFORMING FOSTER YOUTH OF THEIR POTEN2 TIAL ELIGIBILITY FOR FEDERAL STUDENT AID.—The 

3 Secretary shall inform each student who indicates on a 

4 FAFSA form, in either paper or electronic format, that 

5 the student is a foster youth or was in the foster care 

6 system of the student’s potential eligibility for Federal 

7 student aid, including the specific Federal programs under 

8 which such student may be eligible to receive assistance 

9 such as the John H. Chafee Foster Care Independence 

10 Program under section 477 of the Social Security Act (42 

11 U.S.C. 677).’’. 

12 SEC. 3. INFORMATION FOR FOSTER YOUTH ON DEPART13 MENT WEB SITE. 

14 Section 485E(b) of the Higher Education Act of 

15 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1092f(b)) is amended by adding at the 

16 end the following: 

17 ‘‘(5) INFORMATION FOR FOSTER YOUTH ON DE18 PARTMENT WEB SITE.—The Secretary shall include 

19 on the Department’s Web site information for foster 

20 youth regarding such youth’s potential eligibility for 

21 Federal student aid, including the specific Federal 

22 programs under which such youth may be eligible to 

23 receive assistance.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1**Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906**In connection with the quarterly report of Orchids Paper Products Company (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael P. Sage, Chief Executive Officer andPresident of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) andSection 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.       /s/ Michael P. Sage Michael P. Sage    Chief Executive Officer and President    November 3, 2006  
29
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 2, 2018

No. 04-17-00860-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF B.M.M., A CHILD,

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017-PA-00506

Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal from a trial court’s order terminating appellant’s parental 

rights. Appellant’s brief was due on February 1, 2018, and on that day, appellant filed a motion 

requesting an extension of time of twenty days. In his motion, appellant’s counsel states he 

needs additional time to research and prepare the brief. 

After consideration, we GRANT appellant’s motion for extension of time to file a brief 

and ORDER that appellant file his brief on or before February 21, 2018. Counsel is reminded 

that this court is mandated to dispose of appeals involving termination of parental rights within 

180 days from the date the notice of appeal is filed. TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2. Accordingly, any 

delay in the filing of the brief encroaches upon our time for disposition, and further requests for 

extensions of time will be disfavored. 

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 2nd day of February, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
98-907.

#### State v. Decker.

Lucas App. No. L-98-1088. Reported at 82 Ohio St.3d 1474, 696 N.E.2d 602. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>

<CIK>  0000792978
<NAME> CARLYLE INCOME PLUS, LTD.


<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>           12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>       DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>            DEC-31-1997

<CASH>                             6,453,795
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                        118,244
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   6,572,039
<PP&E>                                     0
<DEPRECIATION>                             0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    11,996,978
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                113,894
<BONDS>                                    0
<COMMON>                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                        11,883,084
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>      11,996,978
<SALES>                            1,582,241
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   2,127,369
<CGS>                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        740,209
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     424,460
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   2,900,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (1,937,300)
<INCOME-TAX>                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (1,619,024)
<DISCONTINUED>                     4,519,657
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                       2,900,633
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          31.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                          31.51


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
23.1
  Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  The Board
of Directors
  Noble
Energy, Inc.:
  We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-108162, 333-118976, 333-118977, 333-124964, 333-143203 and 333-143204) on
Form S-8 of Noble Energy, Inc. of our reports dated February 18, 2009, with
respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Noble Energy, Inc. as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, shareholders’ equity,  comprehensive income and cash flows
for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, and
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2008, which reports appear in the December 31, 2008
annual report on Form 10-K of Noble Energy, Inc. Our report with respect to the
consolidated financial statements refers to changes in the method of
accounting for defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans in
2006.
  
  /s/ KPMG
LLP
  Houston,
Texas
 February
18, 2009
  1
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Section 906Certification**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), the undersigned officer ofCentennial Bank Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifiesthat the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:  May 7, 2008 |                |
|--------------------------|---------------------|
|                     |                |
|                     |                |
|                     | /s/ Daniel M. Quinn |
|                     | Name:               | Daniel  M. Quinn |
|                     | Title:              | *Chief  Executive Officer* |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnishedsolely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C. Section 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as aseparate disclosure document.

 

----
#### §§ 1788.51-1788.53 [Reserved]
§ 1970.18 Emergencies. When an emergency exists and the Agency determines that it is necessary to take emergency action before preparing a NEPA analysis and any required documentation, the provisions of this section apply. ( a ) *Urgent response.* The Agency and the applicant, as appropriate, may take actions necessary to control the immediate impacts of an emergency (see § 1970.53(e)). Emergency actions include those that are urgently needed to restore services and to mitigate harm to life, property, or important natural or cultural resources. When taking such actions, the Agency and the applicant, when applicable, will take into account the probable environmental consequences of the emergency action and mitigate foreseeable adverse environmental effects to the extent practicable.
( b ) *CE- and EA-level actions.* If the Agency proposes longer-term emergency actions other than those actions described in paragraph (a) of this section, and such actions are not likely to have significant environmental impacts, the Agency will document that determination in a finding for a CE or in a FONSI for an EA prepared in accordance with this part. If the Agency finds that the nature and scope of proposed emergency actions are such that they must be undertaken prior to preparing any NEPA analysis and documentation associated with a CE or EA, the Agency will identify alternative arrangements for compliance with this part with the appropriate agencies. ( 1 ) Alternative arrangements for environmental compliance are limited to actions necessary to control the immediate impacts of the emergency.
( 2 ) Alternative arrangements will, to the extent practicable, attempt to achieve the substantive requirements of this part.
( c ) *EIS-level actions.* If the Agency proposes emergency actions other than those actions described in paragraphs (a) or (b) of this section and such actions are likely to have significant environmental impacts, then the Agency will consult with the CEQ about alternative arrangements in accordance with CEQ regulations at 40 CFR 1506.11 as soon as possible.
2005-2134.

#### Preferred Capital, Inc. v. Power Eng. Group, Inc.

Summit App. Nos. 22475, 22476, 22477, 22478, 22485, 22486, 22487, 22488, 22489, 22497, 22499, 22506 and 22513, 163 Ohio App.3d 522, 2005-Ohio-5113. On motion to strike Proposition of Law Nos. II and III of appellants’ merit brief. Motion denied.

O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of H-Lines Finance Holding Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending March 26, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles G. Raymond, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ CHARLES G. RAYMOND               
|Charles G. Raymond                   
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)        

April 28, 2006



-33-
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT (23.2)


        CONSENT OF HACKER, JOHNSON, COHEN & GRIEB, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-3, File No. 333-20893) of Jones Medical Industries, Inc. and in the
related Prospectus of our report dated April 25, 1996 (except for note 16 as to
which the date is July 30, 1996) with respect to the consolidated balance
sheets of Galen Drugs of Florida, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30,
1995, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders' equity
and cash flows for the years ended September 30, 1995 and 1994, which
report is included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Jones Medical
Industries, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1996.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8, File No. 33-40184) pertaining to the 1982 Incentive Stock Option
Plan and the 1989 Incentive Stock Option Plan of Jones Medical Industries, Inc.
of our report dated April 25, 1996 (except for note 16 as to which the date is
July 30, 1996) with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Galen Drugs
of Florida, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 1995, and the related
consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders' equity and cash flows
for the years  ended September 30, 1995 and 1994, which report is included in
this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Jones Medical Industries, Inc. for the year
ended December 31, 1996.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8, File No. 333-15879) pertaining to the 1994 Formula Stock Option Plan
for Non-Management Directors and the 1994 Incentive Stock Plan of Jones Medical
Industries, Inc. of our report dated April 25, 1996 (except for note 16 as to
which the date is July 30, 1996) with respect to the consolidated balance
sheets of Galen Drugs of Florida, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30,
1995, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, stockholders'
equity and cash flows for the years ended September 30, 1995 and 1994, which
report is included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Jones Medical
Industries, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1996.


                                                  HACKER, JOHNSON, COHEN & GRIEB

Tampa, Florida
March 10, 1997