alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21.1

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                            % of Voting
                                                                 Jurisdiction of       Securities Held at
                                                                  incorporation            December 31,
            NAME OF CORPORATION                                  or organization             2003(a)
   -----------------------------------                           ---------------       ------------------

<S>                                                                                           <C>
  Kronos Worldwide, Inc.                                           Delaware                   51(b)
  EWI RE, Inc.                                                     New York                  100
  Kronos Louisiana, Inc.                                           Delaware                  100
  NL Industries (USA), Inc.                                        Texas                     100
  NLO, Inc.                                                        Ohio                      100
  Salem Lead Company                                               Massachusetts             100
  153506 Canada Inc. (c)                                           Canada                    100
  Tremont Holdings, LLC                                            Delaware                  100
  NL Environmental Management Services, Inc.                       New Jersey                 78(c)
      EMS Financial, Inc.                                          Delaware                  100
  The 1230 Corporation                                             California                100
  United Lead Company                                              New Jersey                100
</TABLE>





(a)  Held by the Registrant or the indicated subsidiary of the Registrant
(b)  Subsidiaries  of Kronos  Worldwide,  Inc. are  incorporated by reference to
     Exhibit  21.1 of  Kronos'  Annual  Report on Form  10-K for the year  ended
     December 31, 2003 (File No. 1-31763).
(c)  Registrant  directly owns 56% and  indirectly  owns 22% via 153506  Canada,
     Inc.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ANTHONY SOSA,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

Nos. 4D16-3587, 4D16-3588, 4D16-3605

[October 26, 2017]

Consolidated appeals from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth 

Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Martin J. Bidwell, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 

09-20001CF10A, 08-21414CF10A and 12-799CF10A.

Andrew Rier of Rier Jordan, P.A., Miami, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jessenia J. 

Concepcion, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, GROSS and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 14, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-10848

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LARRY JOHN BALL,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:04-CR-373-ALL

--------------------

Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Larry

John Ball has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief

as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Ball

has not filed a response. Our independent review of counsel’s

brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. 

Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS 

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
#### J. C. Rodes *vs.*William Hays.

Error to the Fat ettc Circuit; Higkey, Judge.

©ase 172.

*Fee*bills, *quashal of. Jiirisdiction.*

October 22.

Where judgbeen quashing fee billof a clerk, he iiicl not appear, the record ouSilt to shew which court had juristic-tion-

*.Mays. Wickliffe*and *Wooley,*for plaintiff; *Cowcin*§.nd Uaggin, for defendant.

Chief Justice Robertson

delivered the Opinion of (he Court.

At the instance of William Hays, the defendant in error, the circuit judge of Favette gave judgment in his favor against the plaintiff in error, as clerk of the county court of said county, for the amount of a fee hill exhibited by the defendant, and purporting to have been issued by the plain-.¡A? 1 1 *a j r*

There seems to have been no appearance by the plaintiff in error until after the judge had taken time and was in the act of rendering judgment. We cannot, therefore, *presume*that any fact was proved or admitted after such appearance. Consequently, so far as the question of jurisdiction is concerned, the principle settled in Tevis vs. Craig, VI Mon. 7, must he decisive This record does not shew that the defendant in error resided in Fayette county.

Wherefore, for want of record evidence of a fact," indispensable to the jurisdiction of the circuit judge, the judgment is reversed.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 221 (Wednesday, November 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 70289]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28887]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION


Notice of Appointment of Individuals to Serve as Members of 
Performance Review Board

AGENCY: United States International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Appointment of individuals to serve as members of performance 
review board.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------


DATES: Effective: November 9, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cynthia Roscoe, Director of Human 
Resources, U.S. International Trade Commission (202) 205-2651.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Chairman of the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has appointed the following individuals to serve on the 
Commission's Performance Review Board (PRB):

Chair of the PRB: Vice Chairman Irving A. Williamson
Vice-Chair of the PRB: Commissioner Daniel R. Pearson
Member: David Beck
Member: Catherine DeFilippo
Member: Robert B. Koopman
Member: Karen Laney
Member: Lynn I. Levine
Member: James M. Lyons
Member: Stephen A. McLaughlin
Member: Lyn M. Schlitt
Member: Andrew Martin

    This notice is published in the Federal Register pursuant to the 
requirement of 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4). Hearing-impaired individuals are 
advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting 
our TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810.

    By order of the Chairman.

     Issued: November 10, 2010.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-28887 Filed 11-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     I, James R. Musick, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of Vitro Diagnostics, Inc. (the "Company") certify that:

     1. I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Vitro Diagnostics,
Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report; and

     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

Date: February 4, 2004
----------------------



/s/ James R. Musick
-------------------
James R. Musick,
President, Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer
#### Norma Jean MONTGOMERY, Claimant-Appellant, v. R. James NICHOLSON, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 2006-7018.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Nov. 8, 2006.

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of Norma Jean Montgomery’s unopposed motion to voluntarily dismiss her appeal in *Montgomery v. Nicholson,*03-1708, 20 Vet.App. 231 (Vet.App.2005),

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion to dismiss is granted.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 16, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 69916]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28826]



[[Page 69916]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Research Service


Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive License

AGENCY: Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant to KamTec, 
LLC of Lincoln, Nebraska, an exclusive license to U.S. Patent No. 
5,710,099, ``Bioactive Compounds,'' issued on January 20, 1998 and U.S. 
Patent No. 5,854,178, ``Bioactive Compounds,'' issued on December 29, 
1998.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 16, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 
5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Rm. 4-1174, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-5131.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: June Blalock of the Office of 
Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above; telephone: 
301-504-5989.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Government's patent rights in 
these inventions are assigned to the United States of America, as 
represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public 
interest to so license these inventions as KamTec, LLC of Lincoln, 
Nebraska has submitted a complete and sufficient application for a 
license. The prospective exclusive license will be royalty-bearing and 
will comply with the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 
404.7. The prospective exclusive license may be granted unless, within 
thirty (30) days from the date of this published Notice, the 
Agricultural Research Service receives written evidence and argument 
which establishes that the grant of the license would not be consistent 
with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.

Richard J. Brenner,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2010-28826 Filed 11-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-03-P
#### Rhodie Trappio et al., Respondents, v. National Auto Renting Co., Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated May 4, 1966, affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to respondent Trappio. No opinion. Brennan, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur; Ughetta, Acting P. J., and Rabin, J., dissent and vote to reverse the judgment insofar as appealed from and to grant appellants a new trial, with the following memorandum: The nonappealing defendant Tyrell, driver of a passenger vehicle, overtook a 2,800-pound truck driven by defendant Follett which was proceeding, according to Tyrell, at 18 miles an hour. The vehicle struck the truck in the rear when the latter stopped for a red light. There is conflicting testimony as to whether the stop of the truck was abrupt or leisurely. After the impact the truck, not in gear according to Follett, went diagonally across the 30-35 foot width of an intersecting street, mounted a curb and struck plaintiffs. According to Follett, his passenger and a policeman on traffic duty, the truck was propelled across the street by the vehicle. The policeman testified that Tyrell endeavored to leave the scene. Tyrell had no operator’s license. Tyrell offered no testimony as to propelling the truck across the street. The prime issue is that of negligence in causing the truck unswervingly to cross the street after impact. Under all the circumstances, the necessary finding that Follett, despite his testimony to the contrary, did not try to stop or steer, is against the weight of evidence.
#### Gluck Sandor, Respondent, v. Milton Katz, Appellant.

Reynolds, J.

Appeal from an order and judgment of the Supreme Court, Ulster County, on the grounds that the jury’s verdict in favor of respondent in the amount of $15,171.80 is excessive as a matter of law and is against the weight of the evidence. The issue of damages is factual and thus is essentially a determination for the jury. It is only where it can be said that a verdict is clearly excessive that an interference with it and the trial court’s considered evaluation thereof is warranted. That another trier of the facts might well have arrived at a lower amount is not the test *(Colby*v. *Drew,*15 A D 2d 846), nor is the amount of special damages an absolutely controlling factor *(Becker*v. *Ginsberg,*23 A D 2d 916). On the instant record, especially since appellant offered no proof to contradict respondent’s medical testimony and allegations of loss of business and professional opportunities, the jury’s determination of damages must be upheld. We find no merit in appellant’s contention that the verdict was against the weight of the evidence. Order and judgment affirmed, with costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Staley, Jr., JJ., concur in a memorandum decision by Reynolds, J.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 31, 2017

NO. 03-17-00561-CV

In the Matter of N. P.

APPEAL FROM THE 391ST DISTRICT COURT OF TOM GREEN COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, FIELD, AND BOURLAND

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the order signed by the trial court on August 10, 2017. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

order. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s order. Because appellant is indigent and 

unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
§ 160.61 Kinds of certificates issued. A certificate as provided for by section 4 of the act shall be issued to the interested person in duplicate covering naval stores examined at his request, and additional copies, if desired, may be obtained from the inspector. The kind of certificates issued are as follows: ( a ) Turpentine analysis and classification certificate.
( b ) Turpentine field classification certificate.
( c ) Rosin classification and grade certificate.
( d ) Rosin grade and weight certificate.
( e ) Loan and sale certificate for United States graded rosin.
( f ) Classification and grade certificate for rosin in small containers.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
                                                                       1998 10-K

                            F&M BANCORPORATION, INC.

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

F&M Merger Corporation
         F&M Bank-Cannon Valley
         F&M Bank-Central*
         F&M Bank-Darlington, National Association* 
         F&M Bank-East Troy* 
         F&M Bank-Jefferson* 
         F&M Bank-Grant County* 
         F&M Bank-Kiel* 
         F&M Bank-Lakeland* 
         F&M Bank-Landmark* 
         F&M Bank-Northeast* 
         F&M Bank-Prairie du Chien* 
         F&M Bank-Superior* 
         F&M Bank-Winnebago County*

BancSecurity Corporation
         F&M Bank-Iowa Central
         F&M Bank-Iowa South Central
         F&M Bank-Story County

F&M Bank-Algoma* 
F&M Bank-Appleton* 
F&M Bank-Brodhead* 
F&M Bank-Hilbert* 
F&M Bank-Kaukauna* 
F&M Bank-New London*
F&M Bank-Waushara County*
F&M Trust Company

         Each of the above named subsidiaries is a bank or corporation organized
and existing under the laws of the State of Wisconsin, except that:

1.       F&M Bank-Darlington, National Association is a national bank;
2.       F&M Bank-Cannon Valley is a Minnesota state bank;
3.       BancSecurity Corporation is an Iowa corporation; and



<PAGE>   2


4.       F&M Bank-Iowa Central, F&M Bank-Iowa South Central and F&M
         Bank-Story County are Iowa state banks.

------------------

         *Each of these banks has a subsidiary organized and existing under the
laws of the State of Nevada which holds and manages that bank's investments.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000791996
<NAME>                        RANCON INCOME FUND I
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         1,208
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,212
<PP&E>                                         6,025
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,805
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5,488
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          108
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     5,380
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5,488
<SALES>                                        254
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,162
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  771
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                391
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            391
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   391
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

          CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
         (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)


      In connection with the Annual Report of Werner Enterprises,
Inc.  (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December
31,  2009  (the "Report"), filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission,   I,  John  J.  Steele,  Executive  Vice   President,
Treasurer  and  Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  Section 1350, as  adopted  pursuant  to
Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the  best
of my knowledge:

     1.   The  Report fully  complies  with  the  requirements of
          section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act
          of 1934; and

     2.   The  information   contained  in   the  Report   fairly
          presents,  in  all  material  respects,  the  financial
          condition and results of operations of the Company.



February 26, 2010                       /s/ John J. Steele
-----------------                       ---------------------------------------
                                        John J. Steele
                                        Executive Vice President, Treasurer and
                                        Chief Financial Officer
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-13-0000086

26-SEP-2014

11:47 AM
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1366

ANASTASIYA KRUSHEVSKAYA,

Petitioner,

v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals.

Submitted: September 3, 2015 Decided: November 4, 2015

Before SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alexander J. Segal, THE LAW OFFICES OF GRINBERG & SEGAL, 

P.L.L.C., New York, New York, for Petitioner. Benjamin C. 

Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, M. Jocelyn 

Lopez Wright, Senior Litigation Counsel, Melissa K. Lott, Office 

of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, 

Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Anastasiya Krushevskaya, a native and citizen of Belarus,

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals (Board) dismissing her appeal from the immigration 

judge’s denial of her requests for asylum, withholding of 

removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. 

We have thoroughly reviewed the record, including the transcript 

of Krushevskaya’s merits hearing and all supporting evidence. 

We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling 

contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8 

U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that substantial evidence 

supports the Board’s decision. See INS v. Elias–Zacarias, 502 

U.S. 478, 481 (1992).

We have also considered the various bases for 

Krushevskaya’s claim that the immigration judge’s conduct at the 

merits hearing violated her due process rights and find no error 

in the Board’s conclusion that Krushevskaya failed to show that 

the immigration judge was biased or that she did not receive a 

full or fair hearing. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(b)(1) (2012) (giving 

immigration judges authority to “interrogate, examine, and 

cross-examine the alien and any witnesses”); Rusu v. INS, 296 

F.3d 316, 321-22 (4th Cir. 2002) (providing that alien must be 

“accorded an opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in 
3

a meaningful manner, i.e., . . . [to] receive a full and fair 

hearing on [her] claims”).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the 

reasons stated by the Board. In re: Krushevskaya (B.I.A. Mar. 

18, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

PETITION DENIED