alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James Taylor, Appellant.

Order unanimously reversed and matter remitted to Erie County Court for a hearing. Memorandum: This is an appeal from an order denying appellant’s application for a writ of error *coram nobis*without a hearing. In 1954, while on parole from a sentence for a prior felony, appellant committed the felony for which he was sentenced as a second offender to a term of 15 to 20 years. At that time, section 219 of the Correction Law required that the prisoner first serve the remaining portion of the maximum term of the sentence on which he was paroled. Section 218 of the Correction Law provided that the second sentence was deemed to commence and run concurrently after the prisoner served 5 years of his delinquent time. Sections 219 and 218 were amended in 1960 to make the service of delinquent time permissive rather than mandatory. Thereafter the Commissioner of Correction reviewed the sentence of all prisoners and directed that parole violators whose delinquent time would have expired on or before July 1, 1960, the effective date of the amendment, be deemed to have commenced service of the new sentence on that date. In *Matter of Mulligan*v. *Murphy*(14 N Y 2d 223) this procedure was approved and section 219 was held to have no retroactive application. In such circumstances, the appellant would not be eligible for parole until he has served at least 10 years. (Correction Law, § 211; Penal Law, § 1944). There is some indication in the record that the court believed that the defendant would immediately be eligible for parole at the time of the resentenee. On this record we cannot determine that a misunderstanding of the application of section 219 of the Correction Law did not affect the sentence and for that reason a hearing should be held before the Judge who pronounced the resentence. (Appeal from order of Erie County Court denying without a hearing motion to vacate judgment of conviction for robbery, first degree, rendered April 1, 1965.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Henry, Del Veechio and Marsh, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 USC, SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

          In connection with the amended quarterly report of Northern Ethanol, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB/A1 for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Dated: September 22, 2008 | s/Gordon Laschinger___________________ |
|---------------------------|----------------------------------------|

|   | Gordon Laschinger, Chief Executive Officer |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|
Editorial Note on Part 1942
Editorial Notes: Nomenclature changes to part 1942 appear at 80 FR 9878, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1942.12 Loan cancellation. Loans which have been approved and obligations which have been established may be canceled before closing as follows: ( a ) *Form Rural Development 1940-10, “Cancellation of U.S. Treasury Check and/or Obligation.”* The Rural Development Manager or State Director may prepare and execute Form Rural Development 1940-10, Cancellation of U.S. Treasury Check and/or Obligation, in accordance with the Forms Manual Insert (FMI). If the disbursement has been received or is subsequently received in the Area Office, the Rural Development Manager will return it as prescribed in Rural Development Instruction 2018-D.
( b ) *Notice of cancellation.* If the docket has been forwarded to Office of General Counsel that office will be notified of the cancellation by copy of Form Rural Development 1940-10. Any application for title insurance, if ordered, will be cancelled. The borrower's attorney and engineer/architect, if any, should be notified of the cancellation. The Rural Development Manager may provide the borrower's attorney and engineer/architect with a copy of the notification to the applicant. The State Director will notify the Director of Legislative Affairs and Public Information by telephone or electronic mail and give the reasons for such cancellation.
[50 FR 7296, Feb. 22, 1985, as amended at 53 FR 26589, July 14, 1988; 54 FR 39727, Sept. 28, 1989; 59 FR 54788, Nov. 2, 1994; 70 FR 19254, Apr. 13, 2005]
Exhibit 32.1


Certification Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)


In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Noble Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2016 (the “Report”), I, David L. Stover, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:


|    |                                                                                                                                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:February 14, 2017/s/ David L. StoverDavid L. StoverChief Executive Officer
#### The State ex rel. Zolnai, Appellant, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Zolnai v. Indus. Comm.*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 402.]

(No. 97-2522

Submitted August 19, 1998

Decided October 21, 1998.)

*Mitchell A. Stem,*for appellant.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Steven K Aronoff,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission.

*Michael J. Scherach,*Law Director, and *Robert J. Gargasz,*Assistant Law Director, for appellee city of Lorain.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Douglas and Resnick, JJ., separately dissent.

*403F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.

Alice Robie Resnick, J.,

dissenting. I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and return the cause to the Industrial Commission pursuant to *State ex rel. Noll v. Indus. Comm.*(1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 203, 567 N.E.2d 245.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 221 (Wednesday, November 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70347-70348]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28885]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee; Renewal

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of Renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 14(a)(2)(A) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C. App. 2), and 5 USC552b (c), and 
in accordance with Sec.  102-3.65, Title 41 of the Code of Federal 
Regulations, notice is hereby given that the Commercial Space 
Transportation Advisory Committee (COMSTAC) has been renewed for a 2-
year period beginning November 17, 2010. The primary purpose of the 
Committee is to provide information, advice, and recommendations to the 
U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) on matters concerning the U.S. 
commercial space transportation industry. The

[[Page 70348]]

primary goals of the Committee are to evaluate economic, technological, 
and institutional developments relating to the industry; to provide a 
forum for the discussion of problems involving the relationship between 
industry activities and government requirements; and to make 
recommendations to DOT on issues and approaches for Federal policies 
and programs regarding the industry. The Committee will operate in 
accordance with the rules of the Federal Advisory Committee Act and the 
Department of Transportation, FAA Committee Management Order 
(1110.30C).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, CONTACT: Susan Lender (AST-100), COMSTAC 
Executive Director, Office of Commercial Space Transportation, 800 
Independence Avenue SW., Room 325, Washington, DC 20591, telephone: 
(202) 267-8029; e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#86f5f3f5e7e8a8eae3e8e2e3f4c6e0e7e7a8e1e9f0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a7d4d2d4c6c989cbc2c9c3c2d5e7c1c6c689c0c8d1">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Issued in Washington, DC, November 10, 2010.
George C. Nield,
Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation.
[FR Doc. 2010-28885 Filed 11-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit
4.26.1.1


 


PROMISSORY
NOTE EXTENSION AGREEMENT


 


 


This
Promissory Note Extension Agreement, hereinafter referred to as "Extension", entered into this Twenty Ninth day of May,
2012, by and among Intellinetics, Inc, hereinafter called "Maker" Alpharion Capital Partners, hereinafter called "Lender".


 


WHEREAS,
Maker and Lender have entered into a Promissory Note and Subscription Agreement dated December 1, 2011 for the amount of SEVEN
THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED AND N0/100 DOLLARS ($7,500), hereinafter referred to as "Note". Said Note was originally due one
hundred eighty days from its issuance.


 


WHEREAS,
Maker and Lender desire to enter into this Extension Agreement in order to extend the due date of the Note.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, it is dually agreed by both Maker and Lender to extend the due date of the Note from one hundred eighty days to two
hundred seventy days from its date of issuance.


 


All
other provisions of the original Promissory Note and Subscription agreement shall prevail unless otherwise written.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned Maker and Lender has duly executed this Note as of the day and year above first written.


 


 


	 	INTELLINETICS, INC.
	 	 
	 	By: 	/s/ William J. Santiago
	 	 	
	 	 	 
	 	ALPHARION CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Rick Hughes
#### In the Matter of Arthur V. Edulian.

Motion for reinstatement granted only to the extent of referring the matter to the Committee on Character and Fitness for Admission to the Bar for further inquiry and for a report as indicated in the order of this court. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Fein, Sullivan and Markewich, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1955

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1955 appear at 80 FR 9895, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1955.111 Sale of real estate for RH purposes (housing).

Sections 1955.112 through 1955.120 of this subpart pertain to the sale of acquired property pursuant to the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, (RH property). Single family units (generally which secured loans made under section 502 or 504 of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended) are referred to as SFH property. All other property is referred to as MFH property. Notwithstanding the provisions of §§ 1955.112 through 1955.118 of this subpart, § 1955.119 is the governing section for the sale of SFH inventory property to a public body or nonprofit organization to use for transitional housing for the homeless.

[55 FR 3942, Feb. 6, 1990]
NO. SCAD-12-0000608
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner,

vs. JOAN PALMER DAVIS, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (ODC 12-025-9041)
ORDER OF DISBARMENT (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and McKenna, JJ., and Intermediate Court of Appeals Associate Judge Reifurth,

assigned by reason of vacancy)
Upon consideration of the Office of Disciplinary Counsel’s petition for issuance of a reciprocal discipline notice to Respondent Joan P. Davis, the memorandum, affidavit, and exhibits appended thereto, the materials submitted by Respondent Davis on September 20, 2012, and the record, it appears the Supreme Court of the State of Georgia disbarred Respondent Davis from the practice of law in that state on February 27, 2012; this court, on July 30, 2012, issued a notice and order requiring Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAD-12-0000608 12-OCT-2012 08:38 AMRespondent Davis, in accordance with Rule 2.15(c) of the Rules of

the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai # i (RSCH), to show cause within 30 days of the service of the order as to why the same or substantially equivalent discipline should not be imposed in the State of Hawai # i and, in her response, Respondent Davis did not establish any of the four grounds available under RSCH Rule 2.15(c)(1) – (4) to avoid reciprocal discipline in this jurisdiction. It further appears Respondent Davis neglected client matters, failed to reasonably communicate with clients, failed to properly withdraw from representation, made false statements of material fact in connection with a disciplinary matter, and engaged in professional conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation, thereby violating the Hawai# i Rules of Professional Conduct (HRPC) Rules 1.3, 1.4, 1.16, 8.1(b), and 8.4(d). Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to RSCH Rule 2.15(c), that Respondent Davis is disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Hawai # i, effective thirty days after the date of entry of this order, pursuant to RSCH Rule 2.16(c).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in addition to any other requirements for reinstatement imposed by the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai # i, Respondent Davis shall pay all costs of these proceedings as approved upon timely submission

2of a bill of costs and an opportunity to respond thereto, as

prescribed by RSCH Rule 2.3(c).

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, October 12, 2012. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Lawrence M. Reifurth

3
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 221 (Wednesday, November 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 70273]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28984]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group, 
NHLBI Institutional Training Mechanism Review Committee.
    Date: December 10, 2010.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Charles Joyce, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Review Branch/DERA, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 7196, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924. 301-435-0288. 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6c0f0603150f092c0204000e0542020504420b031a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="66050c091f050326080e0a040f48080f0e48010910">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 10, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-28984 Filed 11-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT  (23)


INDEPENDENT  AUDITORS'  CONSENT  AND  REPORT  ON  SCHEDULES

The  Board  of  Directors
Harleysville  Group  Inc.:

     The  audits  referred to in our report dated February 14, 2003 included the
related  financial  statement schedules as of December 31, 2002, and for each of
the  years  in  the  three-year  period ended December 31, 2002, included in the
annual  report  on  Form  10-K.  These  financial  statement  schedules  are the
responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an
opinion  on  these  financial  statement  schedules based on our audits.  In our
opinion,  such financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the
basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all
material  respects,  the  information  set  forth  therein.

     We  consent  to  incorporation  by reference in the registration statements
(Nos.  333-03127, 33-84348, 33-91726, 33-43532, 333-85941, 333-37386, 333-37212)
on Form S-8 and registration statements (Nos. 33-78372, 33-90810) on Form S-3 of
Harleysville  Group  Inc. of our report dated February 14, 2003, relating to the
consolidated  balance  sheets of Harleysville Group Inc. as of December 31, 2002
and  2001,  and  the  related  consolidated  statements of income, shareholders'
equity  and cash flows and related financial statement schedules for each of the
years  in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002, which reports appear in
the December 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K of Harleysville Group Inc., and
of  our  report  dated  March  19,  2003 relating to the statements of financial
condition  of  the  Harleysville  Group  Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan as of
December  31, 2002 and 2001, and the related statements of income and changes in
plan  equity  for  each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
2002,  which  report  appears  in  the  Harleysville  Group  Inc. Employee Stock
Purchase  Plan  annual  report  on  Form  11-K.


/s/  KPMG  LLP

Philadelphia,  Pennsylvania
March  19,  2003


<PAGE>
#### BUKOCY, Appellant, v. CITY OF YONKERS, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

September 28, 1906.)

Action by Joseph Bukocy againsl the city of Yonkers.

PER CTJRIAM.

Judgment reversed, and new trial granted, costs to abide the event; on the ground that the decision is insufficient to support the judgment, and without considering any other questions presented.

HOOKER, J., dissents.
EXHIBIT 12.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-15(e) OR 15d-15(e) OF THE
      SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Li Feilie, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of China Natural Resources,
     Inc. (the "Registrant");

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the year covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the Registrant as of, and for, the years presented in this report;

4.   The Registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the year in which this report is being
     prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the year covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's fourth
     fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
     materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial
     reporting; and

5.   The Registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's board
     of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
     likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process,
     summarize and report financial information; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting.

Date: April 30, 2007

/s/ Li Feilie
Chief Executive Officer