alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
*Wednesday, September 9, 1998*

RECONSIDERATION DOCKET

98-1077.

#### GeCep Corp. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision.

Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 96-S-438 and 96-S-439. Reported at 83 Ohio St.3d 1405, 698 N.E.2d 58. This cause came on for further consideration upon appellant’s motion for reconsideration. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for reconsideration be, and hereby is, granted, and the appeal is reinstated for the limited purpose of considering the parties’ joint motion for remand to the Board of Tax Appeals.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 13, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, August 13, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A20D0007. EJIMAH NWACHUKWU v. LAUREN FERGUSON. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 16A02205 16A00671 16A01390
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 27 (Wednesday, February 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 6676]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2888]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Member Conflict: Trafficking, Opioid Receptors, Addiction, 
and Antidepressants.
    Date: March 3, 2010.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 3 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Joanne T. Fujii, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 4184, MSC 7850, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-
1178, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6f091a050606052f0c1c1d4101060741080019"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fc9a8996959596bc9f8f8ed2929594d29b938a">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; BMIT/CMIP/MEDI Imaging Applications.
    Date: March 3, 2010.
    Time: 12 p.m. to 3:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Weihua Luo, MD, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 5114, MSC 7854, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 435-
1170, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#721e071d05321101005c1c1b1a5c151d04"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1e726b71695e7d6d6c3070777630797168">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 3, 2010.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-2888 Filed 2-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 1970.9 Levels of environmental review. ( a ) The Agency has identified classes of actions and the level of environmental review required for applicant proposals and Agency actions in subparts B (CEs), C (EAs), and D (EISs) of this part. An applicant seeking financial assistance from the Agency must sufficiently describe its proposal so that the Agency can properly classify the proposal for the purposes of this part.
( b ) If an action is not identified in the classes of actions listed in subparts B, C, or D of this part, the Agency will determine what level of environmental review is appropriate.
( c ) A single environmental document will evaluate an applicant's proposal and any other activities that are connected, interdependent, or likely to have significant cumulative effects. When a proposal represents one segment of a larger interdependent proposal being funded jointly by various entities, the level of environmental review will normally include the entire proposal.
( d ) Upon submission of multi-year planning documents, such as Telecommunications Program Loan/System Designs or multi-year Electric Program Construction Work Plans, the Agency will identify the appropriate classification for all proposals listed in the applicable design or work plan and may request any additional environmental information prior to the time of loan approval.
Nicor
Inc.


Form
10-K


Exhibit
32.01





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned
officer of Nicor Inc. (the “Company”) hereby
certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





(i)           the
accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the twelve month
period ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(ii)          the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  February
      24, 2010
            
            /s/
      RUSS M. STROBELRuss
      M. StrobelChairman,
      President and Chief Executive Officer
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Statistics in Schools      

# Resource: Statistics in Schools

The U.S. Census Bureau provides free classroom materials across multiple subjects for students in pre-K through 12th grade. New activities, designed specifically for the 2019-2020 school year, spotlight the 2020 Census and the importance of making sure everyone is counted, especially children. **Learn more.**
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1967 

To amend the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 

to expand the cause of action relating to the pattern or practice of 

conduct by a governmental authority that deprives a person of rights 

protected by the Constitution to such conduct relating to adults as 

well as juveniles. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 14, 2013 

Mr. DEUTCH (for himself and Mr. SCOTT of Virginia) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement 

Act of 1994 to expand the cause of action relating to 

the pattern or practice of conduct by a governmental 

authority that deprives a person of rights protected by 

the Constitution to such conduct relating to adults as 

well as juveniles. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Right to Counsel and 

5 Taxpayer Protection Act’’. 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1967 IH

1 SEC. 2. PATTERN OR PRACTICE LITIGATION. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 210401(a) of the Violent 

3 Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (42 

4 U.S.C. 14141(a)) is amended— 

5 (1) after ‘‘responsibility for the administration 

6 of’’, by striking ‘‘juvenile justice’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘criminal justice, juvenile justice,’’ ; and 

8 (2) after ‘‘or the incarceration of’’, by striking 

9 ‘‘juveniles’’ and inserting ‘‘persons (including juve10 niles)’’. 

11 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—Section 210401(b) of 

12 the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 

13 1994 (42 U.S.C. 14141(b)) is amended by striking ‘‘para14 graph (1)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (a)’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2041 

To modify the definition of fiduciary under the Employee Retirement Income 

Security Act of 1974 to exclude appraisers of employee stock ownership 

plans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 17, 2013 

Mr. GUTHRIE (for himself, Mr. LOEBSACK, and Ms. JENKINS) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the 

Workforce 

A BILL 

To modify the definition of fiduciary under the Employee 

Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 to exclude appraisers of employee stock ownership plans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FIDUCIARY EXCLUSION. 

4 Section 3(21)(A) of the Employee Retirement Income 

5 and Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1002(21)(A)) is 

6 amended by inserting ‘‘and except to the extent a person 

7 is providing an appraisal or fairness opinion with respect 

8 to qualifying employer securities (as defined in section 

9 407(d)(5)) included in an employee stock ownership plan 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2041 IH

1 (as defined in section 407(d)(6)),’’ after ‘‘subparagraph 

2 (B),’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

** The Honorable William Q. Hayes, United States District Judge for the

Southern District of California, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

COLLINS DEVELOPMENT, INC.

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE

CORPORATION, AS RECEIVER FOR

SILVER STATE BANK,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-16201

D.C. No. 2:09-cv-00427-RCJ-RJJ 

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Robert C. Jones, District Judge, Presiding

 Argued and Submitted June 13, 2011

San Francisco, California

Before: O’SCANNLAIN and BYBEE, Circuit Judges, and HAYES, District **

Judge.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), as receiver for Silver State

Bank, appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of Collins Development

FILED

JUN 30 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2

(“Collins”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de

novo. See Trs. of Constr. Indus. & Laborers Health & Welfare Trust v. Hartford

Fire Ins. Co., 578 F.3d 1126, 1128-29 (9th Cir. 2009).

Even if Collins had a mechanic’s lien which attached prior to the date of

receivership, due to Collins’s failure to comply with the perfection requirements in

section 108.226 of the Nevada Revised Statutes, this lien was “invalid as a matter

of law,” and Collins was not entitled “‘to any benefits occasioned by its existence’”

as of the date of receivership. Schofield v. Copeland Lumber Yards, Inc., 692 P.2d

519, 520-21 (Nev. 1985) (quoting Fisher Bros., Inc. v. Harrah Realty Co., 545

P.2d 203, 204 (Nev. 1976)). Pursuant to Nevada law, Collins was not entitled to

any benefits—including priority status—from its mechanic’s lien on the real

property at issue as of the date of receivership.

After the date of receivership, Collins was not permitted to perfect because a

creditor may not improve its position post-receivership pursuant to the Financial

Institutions Reform and Recovery Enforcement Act (“FIRREA”). See 12 U.S.C. §

1825(b)(2) (“When acting as a receiver . . . [n]o property of the Corporation shall

be subject to levy, attachment, garnishment, foreclosure, or sale without the

consent of the Corporation, nor shall any involuntary lien attach to the property of

the Corporation.”); 12 U.S.C. § 1821(d)(13)(C) (“No attachment or execution may
3

issue by any court upon assets in the possession of the receiver.”); cf. First Empire

Bank-New York v. FDIC, 634 F.2d 1222, 1225 (9th Cir. 1980) (stating that, as

between a creditor and the FDIC acting as receiver for an insolvent bank, “[t]he

rights of the parties become fixed as of the date of [the bank’s] insolvency” (citing 

Scott v. Armstrong, 146 U.S. 499, 510 (1892))). The district court did not have

authority to lift FIRREA’s bar on recordation nunc pro tunc and declare Collins’s

lien to be perfected, valid, and enforceable.

We reverse summary judgment for Collins and remand for further

proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS EARPLUG

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

 MDL No. 3:19md2885-MCR/GRJ

This document relates to the following

case only:

 District Judge M. Case Rodgers

 Magistrate Judge Gary Jones

Joseph Taylor v. 3M Company, et al

7:20cv71-MCR/GRJ

CLERK'S DISMISSAL

Upon JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE filed herein,

pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the foregoing entitled cause be, and the same

hereby is, dismissed with prejudice, with Plaintiff Joseph Taylor to pay Defendants'

costs in the amount of $18,598.34.

July 28, 2021

DATE

Jessica J. Lyublanovits, 

Clerk of Court

/s/ Donna Bajzik 

Deputy Clerk: Donna Bajzik

. 

Case 7:20-cv-00071-MCR-GRJ Document 24 Filed 07/28/21 Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ANTHONY THOMAS BUONAIUTO III,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 752 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 28th day of April, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Editorial Note on Part 1956
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1956 appear at 80 FR 9901, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1956.136 Chargeoff. ( a ) *Judgment debts.* Subject to the provisions of § 1956.112(d) of this subpart, judgment debts, regardless of the amount, may be charged off without the debtor's signature upon a favorable recommendation of the servicing official provided: ( 1 ) The United States Attorney's file is closed, and
( 2 ) The requirements of § 1956.130(b)(1), (2), (3), or (4) of this subpart have been met, as appropriate, or two years have elapsed since any collections were made on the judgment and the debtor(s) has no equity in property on which the judgment is a lien or on which it can presently be made a lien.
( b ) *Nonjudgment debts.* Debts which cannot be settled under other sections of this subpart may be charged off without the debtor's signature upon a favorable recommendation of the servicing official in the following instances: ( 1 ) When the OGC advises in writing that the claim is legally without merit, or that evidence necessary to prove the claim in court cannout be produced.
( 2 ) When there is no known security for the debt, the debtor has no other assets from which the debt could be collected, and the debtor: ( i ) Is unable to pay any party of the debt and has no reasonable prospect of being able to do so, or
( ii ) Is able to pay part or all of the debt but refuses to do so, and an opinion is received from OGC to the effect that the Government cannot enforce collection of a significant amount from assets or income.
( 3 ) When the debtor is deceased (individuals only), disappeared (individuals only), or when it is impossible or impractical to obtain the debtor's signature, and the conditions of § 1956.136(b)(2) of this subpart are met.
Editorial Note on Part 1944
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1944 appear at 80 FR 9885, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1944.264 Evaluation of Congregate Housing Services Programs. ( a ) Grantees shall submit annually to the Secretary concerned, a report evaluating the impact and effectiveness of CHSPs at the grant sites, in such form as the Secretary concerned shall require.
( b ) The Secretaries concerned shall further review and evaluate the performance of CHSPs at these sites and shall evaluate the Program as a whole.
( c ) Each grantee shall submit a certification with its application, agreeing to cooperate with and to provide requested data to the entity responsible for the Program's evaluation, if requested to do so by the Secretary concerned.
Exhibit 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


       In connection with the Annual Report of China Resources Development, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Ching Lung Po, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Ching Lung Po
---------------------------
Ching Lung Po
Chief Executive Officer
April 15, 2003
<PAGE>   1

                                                                  EXHIBIT 11-1


                  THE NAVIGATORS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                       COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

        Earnings Per Share of Common Stock and Common Stock Equivalents

                     (In thousands, except per share data)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                 ----------------------------------------------------------
                                                          1996                     1995              1994
                                                 ----------------------   ------------------------  --------
<S>                                              <C>                      <C>                       <C>
Net income applicable to common stock               $16,752,438               $12,582,467            $(20,495,199)
Average number of common shares outstanding           8,192,526                 8,154,214               8,150,776
Add:
Assumed exercise of stock options and
partially paid stock options exercised(1)               108,503                    64,904                 58,018
                                                 --------------             --------------           -----------
Common and common equivalent shares outstanding       8,301,029                 8,219,118              8,208,794
                                                 ==============             ==============           ===========
Net income per share assuming exercise of
common stock equivalents                            $      2.02                    $(1.53)                $(2.50)
                                                 ==============             ==============           ===========
</TABLE>

(1) Computed for purposes of primary earnings per share.  There is no material
difference between earnings per share on a primary or fully diluted basis.
§ 1b.2 Policy. ( a ) All policies and programs of the various USDA agencies shall be planned, developed, and implemented so as to achieve the goals and to follow the procedures declared by NEPA in order to assure responsible stewardship of the environment for present and future generations.
( b ) Each USDA agency is responsible for compliance with this part, the regulations of CEQ, and NEPA. Compliance will include the preparation and implementation of specific procedures and processes relating to the programs and activities of the individual agency, as necessary.
( c ) The Under Secretary, Natural Resources and Environment (NR&E), is responsible for ensuring that agency implementing procedures are consistent with CEQ's NEPA regulations and for coordinating NEPA compliance for the Department. The Under Secretary, NR&E, through the Agricultural Council on Environmental Quality, will develop the necessary processes to be used by the Office of the Secretary in reviewing, implementing, and planning its NEPA activities, determinations, and policies.
( d ) In connection with the policies and requirements set forth in this part, all USDA agencies are responsible for compliance with Executive Order 12114, “Environmental Effects Abroad of Major Federal Actions.” Compliance will include the preparation and implementation of specific procedures and processes relative to the programs and activities of the individual agencies, as necessary. Agencies shall consult with the Department of State; the Council on Environmental Quality; and the Under Secretary, NR&E, prior to placing procedures and processes in effect.
[48 FR 11403, Mar. 18, 1983, as amended at 60 FR 66481, Dec. 22, 1995]
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 26, 2020

No. 04-20-00016-CR

Erica Hampton BRICKWELL,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CR4489

Honorable Laura Lee Parker, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant was initially represented by court-appointed counsel from the Bexar County 

Public Defender’s Office, Dean A. Diachin. On February 24, 2020, retained counsel Matthew C. 

Valley filed a notice of appearance to represent Appellant on appeal, and Dean A. Diachin filed a 

motion to withdraw as appellate counsel.

Dean A. Diachin’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. 

We direct the clerk of this court to update this court’s records to show Matthew C. Valley 

as Appellant’s attorney of record in this appeal.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 26th day of February, 2020.
___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz,

Clerk of Court