alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SERVED JULY 26, 2012 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

MONROE AIR CENTER LLC · 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED) 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012-0775 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This. proceeding(heretofore designated as Case No. 2011SW030084) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

persons on the attached Service List. 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence A venue, S. W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC--430 

Wilbur WrightBuilding-Sl)ite 2W10001 

Alan Armstrong, Respondent :s Counsel 

2900 Chamblee Tucker Road 

Building 5, Suite 350 

Atlanta, GA 30341 

TEL: 770-451-0313 

FAX: 770-451-0317 

Tim Duff, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Southwest Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 

Ft. Worth, TX 76137 

TEL: 817-222,.5099 

FAX: 817-222-5092 

ONE COPY 

The Honorable J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 · 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2012-0775 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

'o 

1 

Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person ()r by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S. W., Wilbur Wright Building-;--Suite 2Wl 000, Washington, · DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           7,575
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   94,461
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,890
<INVENTORY>                                     22,025
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               124,396
<PP&E>                                          36,784
<DEPRECIATION>                                  28,937
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 441,576
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,262
<BONDS>                                          1,334
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      91,604
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   441,576
<SALES>                                        516,400
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               516,400
<CGS>                                          280,468
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  280,468
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                13,500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 34,955
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,668
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             20,287
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,287
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
                   Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                   As Adopted Pursuant to
                   Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intelligentias, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Ian W. Rice, as Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, and Thomas A. Spanier, as Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.



|Date: May 20, 2008 | /s/ Ian W. Rice
                      Ian W. RiceChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer  (Principal Executive Officer)
|------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | /s/ Thomas A. Spanier
                      Thomas A. SpanierChief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.

---
49–008 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 109–480 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 5429, 

AMERICAN-MADE ENERGY AND GOOD JOBS ACT 

MAY 24, 2006.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. BISHOP of Utah, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 835] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 835, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 5429, the American-Made Energy and Good Jobs Act, under a closed rule. The rule 

provides one hour of debate in the House equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Resources. The rule waives all points of order against 

consideration of the bill. Finally, the rule provides one motion to 

recommit. 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The Committee is not aware of any points of order against consideration of the bill. The waiver of all points of order against consideration of the bill is prophylactic in nature. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMRPT
No. 12573 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 1973

NICHOLAS JOHN DiGIALLONARDO, Petitioner,
VS. DEAN S. BETZER, Sheriff of Yellowstone County, Montana, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING:

Counsel of Record: For Petitioner: Robert L. Stephens, Jr., Billings, Montana

Submitted August 8, 1973 Decided:

## NO\1 3973PER CURIAM: This is an original proceeding whereinpetitioner seeks postconviction relief. He was convicted of firstdegree burglary by a jury in the district court of Yellowstone County. Charles F. Moses, attorney, was employed by petitioner and codefendant, Joseph DeGesualdo, to represent them. Petitioner's convictionand that of his codefendant was affirmed by this Court in Statev. DiGiallonardo and DeGesualdo, Mont

# . - , 503 P.2d 43, 29 St.Rep. 918. On appealwe found that the trial court did not abuse its discretion indenying appellants'motion for continuance, that exhibits admitted were not products of anunlawful arrest and that therewas sufficient corroborativetestimonypresented by the state to allow the use of the testimony of an accomplice. Petitioner in applying forpostconviction relief under section 95-2601,R.C.M. 1947,urges that hewas denied effective counsel, that there was a material variance in the averments of thepleadings as to the factsproven denying petitioner his right to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation
as guaranteed by the Sixth and FourteenthAmendments to the Constitution of the United Statesand that petitioner was denied his right to due process and to a fair trial as guaranteed by the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. Petitioner also urges that this Court reconsider all of the issues that were raised on appeal. With respect to those issueswe reaffirm our holding. The only issueproperly raised by petitioner is that he
was denied effective counsel. This Court knows of the competency of trial counsel and that same counsel handled the appeal. Defendant's choice ofcounsel cannot later be used as a guise for a new trial where
no showing of actual ineffectiveness is made. Here we simply have a new counselwho would have done things differently and who would take every means to spring his client. The application is denied.
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Notes:

1. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 83 FR 22178, May 14, 2018.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 83 FR 61310, Nov. 29, 2018

3. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 85 FR 65504, Oct. 15, 2020.

4. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 87 FR 44266, July 26, 2022.

###### Editorial Note on Subpart J of Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to subpart J of part 2 appear at 60 FR 66713, Dec. 26, 1995.

#### § 2.61 [Reserved]
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Above Hell Trucking, LLC, Appellant

No. 06-23-00079-CV v.

Garrett LaGrone Services, LLC d/b/a 

Garrett's Wrecker Service, Appellee

Appeal from the 123rd District Court of 

Panola County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 2022-

195). Panel consists of Chief Justice 

Stevens and Justices van Cleef and Rambin. 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice 

van Cleef. 

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We further order that the appellant, Above Hell Trucking, LLC, pay all costs incurred by 

reason of this appeal.

RENDERED JUNE 5, 2024

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

SCOTT E. STEVENS

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
§ 1734.6 Disbursement of loans and grants. ( a ) For financial assistance of $100,000 or greater, prior to the disbursement of a grant and a loan, the recipient, if it is not a unit of government, will provide evidence of fidelity bond coverage as required by 2 CFR part 200, which is adopted by USDA through 2 CFR part 400.
( b ) Grants and loans will be disbursed to recipients on a reimbursement basis, or with unpaid invoices for the eligible purposes contained in this subpart, by the following process: ( 1 ) An SF 270, “Request for Advance or Reimbursement,” will be completed by the recipient and submitted to RUS not more frequently than once a month;
( 2 ) RUS will review the SF 270 for accuracy when received and will schedule payment if the form is satisfactory. Payment will ordinarily be made within 30 days; and
( c ) The recipient's share in the cost of the project must be disbursed in advance of the loan and grant, or if the recipient agrees, on a pro rata distribution basis with financial assistance during the disbursement period. Recipients will not be permitted to provide their contributions at the end of the project.
( d ) A combination loan and grant will be disbursed on a pro rata basis based on the respective amounts of financial assistance provided.
### PD-0319-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 8/19/2015 3:29:23 PM Accepted 8/20/2015 1:50:47 PM

ABEL ACOSTA CLERK
<PAGE>


                                                                  Exhibit 23.2

                             MILLER AND LENTS, LTD.

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS


Encore Acquisition Company
777 Main Street, Suite 1400
Fort Worth, Texas 76102


    We hereby consent to the references to Miller and Lents, Ltd. and to the
proved reserves estimates from our report entitled, "Encore Acquisition Company,
Reserves and Future Net Revenues, as of December 31, 2001, SEC Case" dated
January 21, 2002 in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Encore Acquisition Company
for the year ending December 31, 2001.

                                          MILLER AND LENTS, LTD.


                                          By:      /s/ Carl D. Richard
                                              -------------------------------
                                                   Carl D. Richard
                                                   Vice President

Houston Texas
March 15, 2002
PROMISSORY NOTE


2012 Q3+Q4 SALARY/BONUS/VACATION/INTEREST/ADJMTS


 


$45,156.03Date: December 31, 2012


 


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Skinvisible, Inc., of
6320 South Sandhill Road, Suite 10, Las Vegas, NV 89120 promises to pay to the order of Terry Howlett ("Lender"),
whose address is 356 Vincents Hollow Circle, Henderson, NV. 89052, or such other place as the Lender may designate in writing to
the undersigned, the principal sum of Forty Five Thousand One Hundred and Fifty Six Dollars and Three Cents ($45,156.03),
together with interest thereon from date hereof until paid, at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum as follows: The entire principal
and interest amount shall be repaid on or before December 31, 2017.


 


All or any part of the aforesaid principal sum may be prepaid
at any time and from time to time without penalty. This note is in regards to gross salary, plus bonuses due from July 1, 2012
to December 31, 2012.


 


Upon written request by Lender, the principal of this loan
may be converted to common shares of Skinvisible, Inc. at the price of Three Cents ($0.03) per share at any time up until
December 31, 2017. In addition, the Company will issue a warrant agreement in the name of your designate, which will give
the holder the right to purchase further shares at Four Cents (S0.04) per share if exercised within 3 years following
the conversion date. The warrant agreement will give the holder the right to purchase one share for every two shares acquired by
the holder in this transaction for an aggregate total of Seven Hundred and Fifty Two Thousand Six Hundred (752,600) additional
shares at the above price.


 


This note is made and executed under, and is in all respects
governed by, the laws of the State of Nevada.


 


	/s/ Terry Howlett
	Skinvisible, Inc.
UNITED STATES
                      SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                            Washington, D.C. 20549



                                   FORM 8-K



                                CURRENT REPORT



    Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934



     Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):  October 30, 2003
                                                       ------------------



Commission    Registrant, State of Incorporation,     I.R.S. Employer
File Number       Address and Telephone Number     Identification Number
------------  -----------------------------------  ---------------------

  1-7297      Nicor Inc.                             36-2855175
              (An Illinois Corporation)
              1844 Ferry Road
              Naperville, Illinois 60563-9600
              (630) 305-9500











<PAGE>


                                                                         Page 1
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Item 7.   Financial Statements and Exhibits
-------   ---------------------------------

The following is furnished as an exhibit to this report.

Exhibit
Number          Description
-------     ---------------------------------------------

 99.1       Press release of Nicor Inc. issued October 30, 2003.


Item 12.  Results of Operations and Financial Condition
--------  ---------------------------------------------

The information in this Item is furnished to, but not filed with, the
Securities and Exchange Commission solely under Item 12 of Form 8-K, "Results
of Operations and Financial Condition."

On October 30, 2003, Nicor Inc. issued a press release announcing financial
results for the quarter ended September 30, 2003. A copy of the press release
is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K and is
incorporated herein by reference.



<PAGE>


                                                                         Page 2
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Signature
---------

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.




                                    Nicor Inc.


Date    October 30, 2003            /s/ KATHLEEN L. HALLORAN
        ----------------            ------------------------
                                    Kathleen L. Halloran
                                    Executive Vice President
                                    Finance and Administration







<PAGE>


                                                                         Page 3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Exhibit Index
-------------

  Exhibit
  Number                    Description of Document
  -------       ----------------------------------------------------

   99.1         Press release of Nicor Inc. issued October 30, 2003.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ruths
Hospitality Group, Inc. for the quarter ended June 29, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the Executive Vice President and President of Ruths
Hospitality Group, Inc., certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Ruths Hospitality Group, Inc.

Date: August 6, 2008



By:

/s/ Geoffrey D. K. StilesGeoffrey D. K. Stiles Executive Vice President and
President of Ruths Chris Steak House, Inc.


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to Ruths Hospitality Group, Inc. and will be retained by Ruths Hospitality Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
2006-0515.

#### State v. Poling.

Portage App. No. 2004-P-0044, 2006-Ohio-1008. On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion granted.

Pfeifer, O’Connor and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.
#### § 201.55 Retests.

Retests shall be made as follows:

(a) When the range of 100-seed replicates of a given test exceeds the maximum tolerated range in the table appearing in this section.

Table of Maximum Tolerated Ranges Between 100-Seed Replicates for Use in Connection With [§ 201.55(A)](/on/2024-09-16/title-7/section-201.55#p-201.55(A))

| Average percent germinations | | Maximum allowed between replicates | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | 4 replicates | 2 replicates |
| 99 | 2 | 5 | |
| 98 | 3 | 6 | |
| 97 | 4 | 7 | 6 |
| 96 | 5 | 8 | 6 |
| 95 | 6 | 9 | 7 |
| 94 | 7 | 10 | 8 |
| 93 | 8 | 10 | 8 |
| 92 | 9 | 11 | 9 |
| 91 | 10 | 11 | 9 |
| 90 | 11 | 12 | 9 |
| 89 | 12 | 12 | 10 |
| 88 | 13 | 13 | 10 |
| 87 | 14 | 13 | 11 |
| 86 | 15 | 14 | 11 |
| 85 | 16 | 14 | 11 |
| 84 | 17 | 14 | 11 |
| 83 | 18 | 15 | 12 |
| 82 | 19 | 15 | 12 |
| 81 | 20 | 15 | 12 |
| 80 | 21 | 16 | 13 |
| 79 | 22 | 16 | 13 |
| 78 | 23 | 16 | 13 |
| 77 | 24 | 17 | 13 |
| 76 | 25 | 17 | 13 |
| 75 | 26 | 17 | 14 |
| 74 | 27 | 17 | 14 |
| 73 | 28 | 17 | 14 |
| 72 | 29 | 18 | 14 |
| 71 | 30 | 18 | 14 |
| 70 | 31 | 18 | 14 |
| 69 | 32 | 18 | 14 |
| 68 | 33 | 18 | 15 |
| 67 | 34 | 18 | 15 |
| 66 | 35 | 19 | 15 |
| 65 | 36 | 19 | 15 |
| 64 | 37 | 19 | 15 |
| 63 | 38 | 19 | 15 |
| 62 | 38 | 19 | 15 |
| 61 | 40 | 19 | 15 |
| 60 | 41 | 19 | 15 |
| 59 | 42 | 19 | 15 |
| 58 | 43 | 19 | 15 |
| 57 | 44 | 19 | 15 |
| 56 | 45 | 19 | 15 |
| 55 | 46 | 20 | 15 |
| 54 | 47 | 20 | 16 |
| 53 | 48 | 20 | 16 |
| 52 | 48 | 20 | 16 |
| 51 | 50 | 20 | 16 |

(b) When at the time of the prescribed final count there are indications, such as presence of firm ungerminated seeds, that a satisfactory germination has not been obtained;

(c) When there is evidence that the results may not be reliable due to improper test conditions, errors in seedling evaluation, the presence of fungi or bacteria, or inaccuracies in counting or recording results;

(d) When a sample shows seedling injury or abnormality as a result of chemical treatment, of exposure to chemicals, or of toxicity from any source. (Retest shall be made in soil or a mixture of soil and sand);

(e) When no two satisfactory tests are within tolerance.

Note to [§ 201.55](/on/2024-09-16/title-7/section-201.55):

To find the maximum tolerated range, compute the average percentage of all 100 seed replicates of a given test, rounding off the result to the nearest whole number. The germination is found in the first two columns of the table. When the differences between highest and lowest replicates do not exceed the corresponding values found in the “4 replicates” column, no additional testing is required. However, if the differences exceed the values in the “4 replicates” column, retesting is necessary.

[[25 FR 8771](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/25-FR-8771), Sept. 13, 1960, as amended at [65 FR 1707](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/65-FR-1707), Jan. 11, 2000]
#### Warner’s Executors *vs.*Spencer.

Pet. & Sum. Case 1X4,

Erior to the Jessamine Circuit; Kelley, Judge.

*Demurrer. Endorsement. Obliteration. Plea.*

If defendant dosiretoavi.il himseK oi an *341Up0n ;i note, he must shew contract and the obliteralionwaswitlv ontins assent. Demurrer w.fl) r,ot avail,

*340May 9.

Chief Justice Robertson

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

The circuit court sustained a demurrer to a petition and summons on a promissory note for money; and this writ of error is prosecuted to reverge that judgment.

*341
      *Hewitt*and *Chinn, for*plaintiffs.

No sufficient reason for sustaining the demurrer, •has been perceived. The only.reason assigned is; that an obliterated endorsemet appeared on the note. That endorsement does not appear to have ever constituted any part of tiie contract between the parties, or to have been ever made by either of them for that or any other purpose. If it had been a part of their contract, and had.been obliterated by the obligee without the assent of the obligor, that fact would be important, but should be pleaded. It cannot be made to appear on demurrer to the petition, *‘*

_ Judgment reversed, and cause remanded, with instructions to overrule the demurrer.