alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2****Certification**I, Richard N. Burger, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Coleman Cable, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have: a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b. designed such internal control over financial reporting, or causedsuch internal control over financial reporting to be designed underour supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding thereliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  c. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting, which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information;and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.     Date: May 9, 2008 **/s/ Richard N. Burger**              **Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice**    **President,**    **Secretary and Treasurer**
NET LNNX BY-LAWS
                       AMENDMENT NUMBER 2
                                
                        January 31, 1997


     The first sentence of Paragraph 1 of Article IV- Directors,
previously amended on January 26, 1996, is hereby deleted and
replaced with the following:

                     ARTICLE IV - DIRECTORS

      1.The business of this corporation shall be managed by its
Board of Directors, which shall consist of at least one in number,
but no more than five, who need not be residents of this
Commonwealth or shareholders in the corporation.
















C:\DMBPAFiles\Client.files\NETLNNX\SEC\9710KSBEx\BLAWAMD2.wpd
# United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 15-1045 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee,

v. NICHOLAS WEBSTER Defendant, Appellant.

**ERRATA SHEET**
The opinion of this Court, issued on April 13, 2016, is amended as follows: On page 3, line 16: "five years" is replaced with "five years'" On page 5, line 1: "18 months" is replaced with "18 months'" On page 6, footnote 5, line 2: "Cook," is replaced with "Cook;" On page 9, line 5: "eleven months" is replaced with "eleven months'" On page 10, line 5: "its" is replaced with "their" On page 13, line 16: "it" is replaced with "said convictions" On page 14, footnote 9, line 14: "firearm," is replaced with "firearm and"
98-1486.

#### State v. Boyd.

Huron App. No. H-97-041. .On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; *sua sponte,*cause held for the decision in 97-1985, *State v. Cook,*Allen App. No. 1-97-21; briefing schedule stayed.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d byN i nth C i r c ui tR ul e 36- 3.

T he H onor abl e A rthurL . A l a r c ón, U ni t e d S t a t e s C i r c ui tJudge f orthe ** N i nth C i r c ui t , s i tt i ng byde s i gna t i on.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on *** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T R OD OL F O C . AN DE R S ON , P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. T A L I S M A N , D R ., D ef

endant- A pp el l ee . N o. 09- 16911 D. C. No . 1 : 0 7 - c v - 0 0 7 1 5 - ALA ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia A rthurL . A l a r c ón, C i r c ui tJudge , P r e s i di ng ** S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r13, 2010 ** * B efo re: S IL V E R M A N , C A L L A H A N , an dN . R . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. 

# FI LED OC T 05 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 16911 2 C a l i f orni as t a t e pr i s one rR odol f o C . A nde r s on appe a l s pr o s e f r om the d is tr ic t c o u rt’s s u m m a ryju d g m e n t in h is 4 2 U .S .C . § 1 9 8 3 a c tio n a lle g in g th a t a p r is o n m e d ic a l o f

f ic ia l f o r c e dh im to ta k e a n tip s y c h o tic m e d ic a tio n s a g a in s t h is w ill. W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n p u r s u a n t to 2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 . W e r e v ie w d e n o v o . Fr os t v . A gnos , 1 5 2 F. 3 d1 1 2 4 , 1 1 2 8 ( 9 th Ci r . 1 9 9 8 ) . W e a f f i rm. T he di s tr i c tc ourtpr ope r l ygr a nt e d s um m a ryj udgm e ntbe c aus e A nde r s on f a i l e d t o r a i s e age nui ne i s s ue of m a t e r i a l f

a c ta s t o w he the rthe pr i s on doc t or v io la te dh is c o n s titu tio n a l r ig h ts b yin v o lu n tar ilym e d ic a tin g h im . Se e W as hi ngton v. H arper , 4 9 4 U .S . 2 1 0 , 2 3 1 - 3 3 ( 1 9 9 0 ) ; Kulas v. V aldez , 1 5 9 F .3 d4 5 3 , 4 5 6 ( 9 th C i r. 19 98 ). W e d o n o t c o n s id e ra r g u m e n ts r a is e df o rth e f ir s t tim e o n ap p e a l. Se e Sm ith v. M a rsh , 19 4 F . 3d 10 45 , 10 52 (9th C i r. 19 99 ). A nd er son’ s r em ai ni ng cont ent i on s are un pers uasi ve. AF F I RME D.
§ 1738.55 Broadband lending speed requirements. ( a ) Projects must meet the broadband build-out standards in paragraphs (a)(1) through (5) of this section in order to be considered for assistance. ( 1 ) Projects with an Award term of less than 5 years must provide service at the broadband lending speed;
( 2 ) Projects with an Award term of 5 to 10 years must provide service at four times the broadband lending speed;
( 3 ) Projects with an Award term of 11 to 15 years must provide service at six times the broadband lending speed;
( 4 ) Projects with an Award term of 16 to 20 years must provide service at eight times the broadband lending speed; and
( 5 ) Projects with an Award term over 20 years must provide service at ten times the broadband lending speed.
( b ) If an Applicant demonstrates that it would be cost prohibitive to meet the broadband lending speed in paragraph (a) of this section in the proposed funded service area due to the unique characteristics of the service territory, the Administrator may agree to utilize substitute service standards. In such cases, Applicants must document in their application why the unique characteristics of such an area make it cost prohibitive to provide service at the broadband lending speed. Note that the proof of burden on Applicants will be extremely high.
Editorial Note on Part 1942
Editorial Notes: Nomenclature changes to part 1942 appear at 80 FR 9878, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1942.118 Other Federal, State, and local requirements. ( a ) Loans under this subpart are subject to the provisions of § 1942.17 (k) of subpart A of this part 1942.
( b ) An initial compliance review should be completed under subpart E of part 1901 of this chapter.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 222 (Thursday, November 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 70742]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29035]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

 [Docket No. ER11-2029-000]


Cedar Creek II, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

November 8, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Cedar Creek II, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with 
an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a 
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR Part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is November 29, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e6a0a3b4a5a9888a8f8883b5939696899492a680839485c8818990"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="24626176676b4a484d4a41775154544b565064424156470a434b52">[email protected]</span></a> or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-29035 Filed 11-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of Innova Pure Water, Inc. (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB of the year ended June 30, 2005, I hereby certify solely for the purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



1.

The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  October 31 2006.





/s/

David L. Zich



Print Name:

David L. Zich

Title:

Chief Executive Officer







/s/

Jim R. Davisson



Print Name:

Jim R. Davisson

Title:

Chief Financial Officer and

Principal Accounting Officer
Document No. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

VS CASE NO. 3:94cr3012LAC

ERNEST DANIELS

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge Lacey Collier on April 25, 2005 and May 6, 2005

Motion/Pleadings: MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION I N LIGHT OF UNITED STATES V

REESE, 382 F.3D 1308, etc. 

Filed by DEFENDANT, PRO SE on3/31/05 Doc.# 721

RESPONSES:

BY GOVT on5/6/05 Doc.# 723

WILLIAM M. McCOOL, CLERK OF COURT

/s/ Mary Maloy-Wells

LC (1 OR 2) Deputy Clerk: Mary Maloy-Wells

ORDER

Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is ORDERED this 17th day of 

May, 2005, that:

(a) The relief requested is DENIED.

(b) The defendant is not entitled to resentencing as this Court lacks

jurisdiction to consider this successive post-conviction motion and the Supreme

Court’s decision in United States v Booker does not apply retroactively to cases

on collateral review. 

 s/L.A. Collier

LACEY A. COLLIER

United States District Judge

Entered On Docket: By: 

Rules 58 & 79(a) FRCP or 32(d)(1) & 55 FRCRP

Copies sent to:

Case 3:94-cr-03012-LC-MD Document 726 Filed 05/17/05 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 1.3
                                   -----------

                            BILLION LUCK COMPANY LTD.
                                   ("Company")
          Unanimous Written Resolution of the Directors of the Company
                      Dated the 24th day of September 2004

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DESIGNATION OF PREFERENCES, RIGHTS AND LIMITATIONS OF SERIES B PREFERRED SHARES
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IT WAS NOTED that the Company proposed to merge with China Resources
Development, Inc. ("China Resources"), a Nevada Corporation, with the Company
being the Surviving Corporation after the merger (the "Merger"). The Merger will
be effected by an exchange of shares of China Resources into shares of the
Company. The aggregate number of shares of common stock which China Resources
has authority to issue is 200,000,000 of which 1,247,823 outstanding and
10,000,000 shares of preferred stock of which 320,000 are outstanding and
designated as series B preferred stock.

IT WAS RESOLVED that, in order to facilitate the shares exchange, 320,000 shares
of the Company's authorized class of preferred shares is hereby established as
Series B Preferred Shares, without par value (the "Series B Preferred Shares").
The preferences and relative, participating, optional, or other special rights
of, and the qualifications, limitations and restrictions imposed upon the Series
B Preferred Shares shall be as follows:

         The Series B Preferred Shares shall entitle the holder thereof to
         voting rights to the same extent and in the same manner as Common
         Shares, such Series B Preferred Shares being aggregated with any
         outstanding Common Shares at the record date of any vote for voting
         purposes of the Company. The Series B Preferred Shares have no
         preemptive or other subscription rights and are not subject to any
         future calls or assessments. There is no redemption or sinking fund
         provisions applicable to Series B Preferred Shares, and holders of
         Series B Preferred Shares have no rights whatsoever to dividends or to
         distributions upon liquidation or dissolution of the Company.

         None of the Series B Preferred Shares shall entitle the holders of any
         demand registration rights and the Company shall not take any action to
         facilitate the registration of such shares; provided, however,
         notwithstanding the forgoing, the Company may, at its option and in its
         sole discretion, include the Series B Preferred Shares in a
         registration statement filed by the Company.

         The Company may, at its option and in its sole discretion, issue any
         other class or series of preferred shares with rights and preferences
         superior to or in parity with the rights and preferences attributable
         to the Series B Preferred Shares.

________________________                           ____________________________
Tam Cheuk Ho                                       Wong Wah On

_______________________
Ching Lung Po
**EXHIBIT 32.1** **CERTIFICATION    OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Commercial    Lines Inc. (the “Company”) on    Form 10-Q    for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the    Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the    “Report”), I, Mark R. Holden, Chief Executive    Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.    § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    result of operations of the Company. /s/  Mark    R. Holden    Mark R. Holden    President and Chief Executive Officer     May 8, 2007
#### § 2003.1 Definitions.

*EEO* —the Equal Employment Opportunity Act of 1972, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e *et seq.*

*O&M* —Operations and Management.

*P&P* —Policy and Planning.

*RBS* —Rural Business-Cooperative Development Service, USDA, or any successor agency.

*RHS* —Rural Housing Service, USDA, or any successor agency.

*Rural Development* —Rural Development mission area of USDA.

*RUS* —Rural Utilities Service, USDA, or any successor agency.

*Secretary* —the Secretary of USDA.

*USDA* —the United States Department of Agriculture.

[62 FR 67259, Dec. 24, 1997, as amended at 84 FR 59923, Nov. 7, 2019]
### Deborah Bartram - Draft WVPA Wabash River Site Visit Notes

Terry,

Representatives of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Eastern Re search Group (contractor to EPA) visited Wabash Valley Power Authority's Wabash River Power Station on February 25, 2009 to gather information for the Agency's detailed study. Attached please find the draft site visit note s and associated atta chments summarizing the processes observed and the informatio n collected during the site visit. Please review this document paying particular attention to accuracy and any potential confidential business informat ion (CBI) concerns. My understanding is that none of the informat ion discussed in these notes is CBI. If this assumption is incorrect, please

let me know.

Please note that there are a few outstanding questions cont ained within the notes. Spec ific questions are embedded and highlighted in the text of the draft site visit notes. Following receipt of your comments, EPA will finalize the notes for inclusion in the record associated with the propos ed revisions to the steam elec tric effluent guidelines.

EPA requests that you provide comments on the draft site visit notes by December 7, 2012. If comments are not received by this date, EPA will assume that the notes are accurate and that there are no CBI concerns regarding the information included in the notes. You may send your comments to Jezebele Alicea via e-mail (if not CBI) at alicea.jezebele@epa.gov , or by mail to:

Regular Mail

Jezebele Alicea Engineering & Analysis Division (4303T) 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, DC 20460

Federal Express

Jezebele Alicea Engineering & Analysis Division EPA West/Connecting Wing (Rm 6231P)
1301 Constitution Ave., NW Washington, DC 20004

Please feel free to contact Jezebele at (202) 566-1755 if you have any questions about the draft site visit notes.

Sincerely,

TJ Finseth

ERG 14555 Avion Parkway, Suite 200 Chantilly, VA 20151 (703) 633-1698 (phone) (703) 263-7479 (fax) thomas.finseth@erg.com From: Thomas Finseth

To: Hogan, Terry

Date: 11/16/2012 2:56 PM
Subject: Draft WVPA Wabash River Site Visit Notes

CC: Bartram, Deborah; Jordan .Ronald@epamail.epa.gov; alicea.jezebele@epa.gov; j _klaas@wvpa.com

Attachments: WVPA Draft Site Visit Notes_11_16_12.docx; Water Balance Flow Diagram.pdf 

### Pa g e 1 of 1

12/6/2012 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\DBartram\Local Settin g s\Tem p \XP g r p wise\50B90A48D

...
###### Editorial Note on Part 1942

#### Editorial Notes:

Nomenclature changes to part 1942 appear at 80 FR 9878, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1942.115 Reasonable project costs.

Applicants are responsible for determining that prices paid for property rights, construction, equipment, and other project development are reasonable and fair. RD may require an appraisal by an independent appraiser or Agency employee.
WG(R)
                      WILSON GREATBATCH TECHNOLOGIES, Inc.

                        THE POWER TO DO GREAT THINGS(TM)

TO:      Ed Voboril

FROM:    Larry DeAngelo

DATE:    March 31, 2003

SUBJECT: Severance Payments

================================================================================

Thank you for agreeing to consider providing a Severance Payment Benefit to me
consistent with the benefit currently in place for the other members of the
Office of the Chairman.

The language should read as follows:

         Larry T. DeAngelo, Senior Vice President Administration and Secretary,
         Wilson Greatbatch Technologies, Inc. (WGT) will be granted a minimum of
         one year of severance payments should his employment be involuntarily
         terminated by WGT. WGT will not be obligated to provide severance pay
         should Mr. DeAngelo voluntarily terminate his employment, voluntarily
         retire, be discharged for cause or terminate due to disability or
         death. Voluntary separation may be triggered for "good reason" as
         defined in the Change of Control Agreement, however, excluding those
         provisions of that definition requiring a Change of Control event.

                                                    /s/ Edward F. Voboril
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Approved: Edward F. Voboril
                                                    Chairman, President & C.E.O.