alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

STATEMENT OF VICE PRESIDENT - FINANCE OF 

NOLAND COMPANY

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

	In connection with the quarterly report of Noland Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Arthur P. Henderson, Jr., Vice President - Finance of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Noland Company and will be retained by Noland Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

Arthur P. Henderson, Jr. 

Arthur P. Henderson, Jr. 

Vice President - Finance 

August 5, 2004
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**Theundersigned officer of **Standard Aero Holdings, Inc.**herebycertifies pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to suchofficer’s knowledge that: 1. the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Standard AeroHoldings, Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of Standard Aero Holdings, Inc.     Date:November 14, 2005           By: /s/ Bradley Bertouille      Name: Bradley Bertouille  Title: Chief Financial Officer     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether madebefore or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2


Certification Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)


In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Noble Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2012 (the “Report”), I, Kenneth M. Fisher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify that to my knowledge:


|    |                                                                                                                                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:October 25, 2012/s/ Kenneth M. FisherKenneth M. FisherChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 23

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT

To the Board of Directors
Business Bancorp

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No. 333-103788, No. 333-76460 and No. 333-69130) of Business Bancorp on Form S-8
of our report dated February 25, 2003 on our audits of the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/S/
Vavrinek, Trine, Day & Co., LLP

March 31,
2003
Rancho Cucamonga, California

---

QuickLinks
#### § 1717.900 Qualification requirements.

Applications for a lien accommodation for supplemental financing required by 7 CFR 1710.110 must meet the same requirements as an RUS insured loan. The justification and documentation materials submitted as part of the borrower's application for an insured loan also serve as the justification and documentation of the request for a lien accommodation for the required supplemental loan. Unless early approval under § 1717.901 is requested by a borrower, these applications will be processed during the same time as RUS's review of the borrower's application for the concurrent insured loan.
§ 201.41 Bags. ( a ) For lots of six bags or fewer, each bag shall be sampled. A total of at least five trierfuls shall be taken.
( b ) For lots of more than six bags, five bags plus at least 10 percent of the number of bags in the lot shall be sampled. (Round off numbers with decimals to the nearest whole number, raising 0.5 to the next whole number.) Regardless of the lot size it is not necessary that more than 30 bags be sampled.
( c ) Samples shall be drawn from unopened bags except under circumstances where the identity of the seed has been preserved.
[5 FR 32, Jan. 4, 1940, as amended at 26 FR 10035, Oct. 26, 1961; 76 FR 31794, June 2, 2011]
#### § 1c.121 [Reserved]
#### Stanley R. Oppenheim, Respondent, v Carole A. Oppenheim, Appellant.

In a matrimonial action, the defendant appeals, as limited by her notice of appeal and brief, from so much of a judgment of divorce of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated November 27, 1978, as denied her alimony and awarded a counsel fee of only $2,000. Judgment modified, on the facts, by increasing the counsel fee by $318.80 so as to include codnsel’s disbursements. As so modified, judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. We agree that defendant has failed to establish her entitlement to alimony considering the respective circumstances of the parties, her annual salary, and her ability to be self-supporting. The counsel fee awarded was inadequate only to the extent indicated. Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
**GAO-06-716SP**                      Published: May 01, 2006. Publicly Released: May 01, 2006.                  

-   
-   
-   
-   

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Status of FY22 Projects 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

Skip to Highlights

## Highlights

This document is a guide to GAO Protective Orders.

## Full Report

Full Report (44 pages)

Accessible Text 

## Office of Public Affairs

### Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
kaczmareks@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

### Public Inquiries

Public Affairs
PublicAffairs@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

## Topics

Justice and Law Enforcement

Bid protest regulationsBid protestsClassified informationConfidential informationInformation resources managementInterested partiesProprietary dataBid evaluation protestsCompetitive advantageE-mail
Placeholder for Copyrighted Documents Docket ID No. EPA - HQ - OAR- 2009 - 0837

March 2 , 20 10 The following two cop yr ighted documents are available at the Docket Center: “Manual of Petroleum Measurement Standards Chapter 4

– Proving Sy stems, Section 3

– Small Volume Provers”, First Edition, July 1988, Reaffirmed, October 1993, b y the American Petroleum Institute; and “Standard Practice for Competence of Air Emission Testing Bodies” , ASTM D 7036 - 04. Accessing dockets: Publicly available docket materials are available either electronicall y in www.regulations.gov or in hard cop y at the Air and Radiation Docket, EPA West Building, Room 3334, 1301 C onstitution Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20460. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday , excluding legal holiday s. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566 - 1744, and the telephone number for the Air and Radiation Docket is (202) 566 - 1742 .
98-1309.

#### State v. Jones.

Summit App. No. 18942. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., dissent.
M13003 Chemical Structure



### CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JACETA ANYA STREETER,

Petitioner,

v. 4:20cv52–WS/MAF

WARDEN, FCI TALLAHASSEE,

Respondent.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF

No. 7) docketed June 11, 2020. The magistrate judge recommends that the

petitioner’s § 2241 petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed for lack of

jurisdiction. The petitioner has filed no objections to the report and

recommendation.

Having reviewed the record, the undersigned finds that the magistrate

judge’s report and recommendation is due to be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

Case 4:20-cv-00052-WS-MAF Document 8 Filed 07/14/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (ECF No. 7) is hereby

ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order. 

2. The respondent’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 6) is GRANTED for the

reasons set forth by the magistrate judge.

3. The petitioner’s § 2241 petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED

for lack of jurisdiction.

4. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: “All claims against the respondent

are DISMISSED.”

DONE AND ORDERED this 14th day of July , 2020.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:20-cv-00052-WS-MAF Document 8 Filed 07/14/20 Page 2 of 2
#### Blair *vs.*Perry.

Chancery. Case 39.

Error to the- Franklin Circuit; H. Davidge, Judge,

*Warranty. Eviction.*

April 6.

Judge Ubde»won»,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Judge Nich. 1 is did not sit in this case.

In 1814, Perry executed a deed purporting to convey Blair a part of out lot No. *4,*in *153Frankfort. The deed warrants the title against all other claims. Shortly after the execution of this deed, Blair filed a bill against the heirs of A. Holmes and others, suggesting that the' title was in said heirs, and praying that they might be compelled to convey to him. Such proceedings were had in this suit as eventuated in a decree requiring the heirs of Holmes to convey to Blair. A commissioner was appointed to make the conveyance. The record. states that be reported a deed to the court, which was approved. The decree was rendered in March, 1821. In 1823, Blair filed a bill against Perry, suggesting, that he was compelled to pay the heirs of Holmes $140 before he could obtain th$ title, that being the purchase money and interest, due them as the representatives of their ancestor, for the lot, and which had not been paid. He, therefore, asked a decree against Perry for the amount. In 1828 the circuit court dismissed the bill with costs, and this is the decision which is sought to he reversed.

Bill to recori by deed with warranthe pur-^ aUeged'to^ have remainec|1 4"? orisi1’* Pirc a-Buídis> missed, there having been "endeef nor* decree or of pay, nor ¡woof that it was at ^ vendor °E

*Monroe,*for plaintiff, *Triplett,*for defendant.

The decree must be affirmed, for many reasons. It does not appear that there has been any breach of Perry’s covenant. No eviction has taken place, Blair has not been disturbed in his possession and enjoyment. The Court did not decree that Blair .should pay the heirs of Holmes any thing. It does .not appear that they could have recovered either .land or money. It is a reasonable inference, from all the facts stated, that there has been such a continued adverse possession, as would completely protect Blair, holding under Perry and his vendors, It does not appear that Perry was guilty of any fraud.. Perry was no party to the compromise tween Blair and the heirs of Holmes. Under these circumstances, any payment made by Blair to them, pr their attorney,, for their use, cannot be regarded jn any other light than as a payment made without the sanction or request of Perry, and such an one as imposes no legal obligation upon him to remunerate Blair.

Wherefore, the decree is affirmed with costs.
§ 22.201 Coordination. The following identifies types and levels of coordination: ( a ) Washington level interdepartmental and interagency coordination for purposes of the Act.
( b ) Coordination for purposes of the Act among agencies within the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
( c ) Coordination among and between the field operations of Federal agencies for purposes of the Act.
( d ) Coordination for purposes of the Act between levels of field operations of the Federal government and State governments.
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1471.1 Provisions common to this subpart. ( a ) *Agriculture Pima Trust* — ( 1 ) *Establishment.* The Agriculture Pima Trust has been established to provide funding for payments under this subpart.
( 2 ) *Purpose.* The purpose of the Agriculture Pima Trust is to reduce the injury to domestic manufacturers resulting from tariffs on cotton fabric that are higher than tariffs on certain apparel articles made of cotton fabric.
( 3 ) *Funding availability.* $16,000,000 will be available annually for eligible payments authorized under this subpart.
( 4 ) *Definitions.* As used in this subpart: *Agriculture Pima Trust* means the Pima Agriculture Cotton Trust Fund.
*CCC* means the Commodity Credit Corporation.
*FAS* means the Foreign Agricultural Service.
*Secretary* means the Secretary of Agriculture.
*U.S.* means the United States of America.
( b ) *Other provisions common to this subpart* — ( 1 ) *Affidavits.* FAS shall annually, not later than February 15 of the year of the applicable payment, make affidavits available on the FAS website. Affidavits must be submitted in accordance with the instructions provided on the FAS website.
( 2 ) *Filing deadline.* Any person filing an affidavit under this subpart for a particular year must file the affidavit not later than March 15 of the applicable calendar year.
( 3 ) *Affirmation.* By submitting an affidavit under this subpart, an applicant is affirming that all information contained in the application is complete and correct and that the information does not contain a false claim, statement, or representation.
( 4 ) *Document retention.* All persons receiving a payment under this subpart must maintain all pertinent documentation for 3 years after the year of receipt of the payment.
( 5 ) *False statements.* Persons providing false or fraudulent claims, or persons making materially false statements or representations in their affidavit, are subject to civil or criminal penalties pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1001.
( 6 ) *Confidentiality.* Specific business information that is marked “business confidential” will be protected from disclosure to the full extent permitted by law.
( 7 ) *Review of affidavits.* Affidavits will be reviewed to determine whether they are complete and responsive to the content and form of affidavit requirements under this subpart.
( 8 ) *Finality of determinations by Secretary.* A determination by the Secretary about a payment under this subpart shall be final and is not subject to appeal or protest.
( 9 ) *Timing of payments.* A payment for which a person is eligible under this subpart will be disbursed not later than April 15 of the applicable year.
( 10 ) *Sequester.* Payments covered by this subpart shall be subject to sequester of payments, if required by law.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1948

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1948 appear at 80 FR 9888, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1948.63 Historic preservation requirements.

The policies and regulations contained in part 1901, subpart F, of this chapter apply to this program.
#### § 15.117 Evidence.

Irrelevant, immaterial, unreliable, and unduly repetitious evidence will be excluded, and technical rules of evidence shall not apply but rules or principles designed to assure the most credible evidence available and to subject testimony to test by cross-examination shall apply.
Exhibit

32.2  CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18

U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION

906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of The Navigators Group, Inc. (the

Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with

the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,

Paul J. Malvasio, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley

Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the

requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;

and (2)The information contained in the Report

fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results

of operations of the Company.   /s/ Paul J. MalvasioPaul J. MalvasioExecutive Vice President andChief Financial OfficerMarch 11, 2004   A signed original of this

written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Navigators

Group, Inc. and will be retained by The Navigators Group, Inc. and furnished to

the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Marie A. De Vries, Appellant, v William H. De Vries, Respondent. William H. De Vries, Respondent, v Marie A. De Vries, Appellant. (And a Third Action.)

of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated October 5, 1979, affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. No opinion. The examination shall proceed at the place designated in the order under review, at a time to be fixed in a written notice of not less than 10 days, to be given by either party, or at such time and place as the parties may agree. Hopkins, J. P., Titone, Mangano and Rabin, JJ., concur.
|  |  |  |  |  |
|--|--|--|--|--|
|  |  |  |  |

  New York-  Albany
-  East New York (Brooklyn)
-  Buffalo
-  Castle Hill (Bronx)
-  Far Rockaway (Queens)
-  Huntington Station
-  Jamestown
-  Mott Haven (Bronx)
-  New Cassel
-  North Bellport
-  NorthAmityville
-  Poughkeepsie
-  Rochester
-  Roosevelt
-  Syracuse
-  Syracuse #2
-  Troy
-  Village of Hempstead

**To: OJPEOWSTop**
Credits| Comments or Questions?| DOJ homePrivacy statement | FOIA
This document was last update on November 24, 2000
Exhibit (23)





Report and Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





The Board of Directors

Harleysville Group Inc.:



The audits referred to in our report dated March 7, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Harleysville Group Inc. and Subsidiaries, included the related financial statement schedules as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2007, included in the annual report on Form 10-K.  These financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statement schedules based on our audits.  In our opinion, such financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-105108, 333-85941, 333-09701, 333-37386, 333-145076) on Form S-8 and registration statements (Nos. 333-104437, 33-78372, 33-90810) on Form S-3 of Harleysville Group Inc. and Subsidiaries of our reports dated March 7, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Harleysville Group Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, and all related financial statement schedules, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, which reports appear in the December 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K of Harleysville Group Inc.



Our report dated March 7, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Harleysville Group Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, contains an explanatory paragraph that describes Harleysville Group Inc.s adoption of the fair value method of accounting for stock-based compensation as required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment.



/s/ KPMG LLP



March 7, 2008
#### § 1774.100 OMB Control Number.

The information collection requirements in this part will not be effective until approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), subject to the submission of a paperwork package to OMB and assigned an OMB Control Number.