alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Candela Corporation (the “Company”)on Form 10-K for the period ending July 2, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, F. Paul Broyer, Chief Financial Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ F. Paul Broyer      |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| F. Paul Broyer          |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| September 29, 2005 |

 

----
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

December 22, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00545

- CR

Santos Javier LOPEZ

, Appellant

v.

The STATE o f Texas, Appellee

From the 63rd Judicial District Court

, Val Verde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020

- 0276

- CR , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s motion for an extension of time to file his brief is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief was filed December 21, 2022.

_________________________________ Liz a A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 22nd day of December, 2022

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
|   | (1)The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));      and |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

|   | (2)The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

| Date:  | February      19, 2009 |   |   | /s/      Charles D. Davidson |
|--------|------------------------|--------|--------|------------------------------|
|   |                   |   |   | Charles      D. Davidson     |
|   |                   |   |   | Chief      Executive Officer |

----
§ 1822.264 Eligibility requirements. ( a ) *Eligibility of applicant.* To be eligible for an RHS loan, the applicant must be a private or public nonprofit organization as defined in § 1822.263 (a) or (b) which is authorized to provide housing sites on a nonprofit basis. ( 1 ) If it is a private nonprofit organization as defined in § 1822.263(a), it should also: ( i ) Have a membership of at least 10 community leaders.
( ii ) Plan to adopt, if it is being newly organized, articles of incorporation and bylaws that generally conform to model articles and bylaws provided by the State director which will be consistent with State law and with changes appropriate to the purposes and powers of an eligible applicant under this subpart.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
( b ) *Authorized representative of applicant.* RHS will deal only with the applicant or bona fide representative or the applicant or the representative's technical advisors. An authorized representative of the applicant must have no pecuniary interest in the award of the engineering, architectural or construction contracts, necessary equipment, or the purchase or development of the land.
[35 FR 16087, July 1, 1970, as amended at 80 FR 9866, Feb. 24, 2015]
http://download.dji-innovations.com/downloads/inspire_1/en/Inspire_1_Quick_Start_Guide_v1

.4_en.zip
Exhibit 31.2**Certification of Principal Financial Officer**I, Keith R. Schroeder, certify that:1.     Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Orchids Paper Products Company (the“Registrant”);2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.     The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:(a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)     [reserved](c)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)     Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5.     The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date:  September 1, 2005 /s/ Keith R. Schroeder   Keith R. Schroeder   Chief Financial Officer
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             Washington, D.C. 20549


                       -----------------------------------


                                    FORM 8-K


                                 CURRENT REPORT



                     Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
                         Securities Exchange Act of 1934



Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): July 20, 1999


                       NL INDUSTRIES, INC.
------------------------------------------------------------------
       (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)



New Jersey                   1-640                    13-5267260
------------------------------------------------------------------
(State or other       (Commission File No.)     (Employer ID No.)
jurisdiction of
incorporation)



16825 Northchase Dr., Suite 1200, Houston, Texas             77060
------------------------------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices)                (Zip Code)



Registrant's telephone number, including area code   (281) 423-3300


                          Not Applicable
------------------------------------------------------------------
   (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)



<PAGE>


Item 5.  Other Events.


         On July 20, 1999,  the  Registrant  issued the press  release  attached
hereto  as  Exhibit  99.1  and  incorporated  herein  in its  entirety  by  this
reference.




Item 7.  Financial Statements, Pro Forma Financial Information and Exhibits.


         (c)      Exhibits

                  (i)      Exhibit 99.1.    Press Release dated July 20, 1999.



                        *      *      *      *      *




                                    SIGNATURE



         Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,
the  Registrant  has duly  caused  this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


                                             NL INDUSTRIES, INC.
                                               (Registrant)



                                             /s/Robert D. Hardy
                                             Vice President & Controller



Dated: July 22, 1999
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 12, 2016

jam 

# Order

Clerk July 12, 2016

1 53684

ROBERT HEXIMER

,

Plaintiff,

v SC: 1 53684

A GC : 3774

- 06

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION

,

Defendant.

___________________________________

On order of the Chief Justice, plaintiff

- appellant having failed to pay the

partial filing fee as required by the order of May 25 , 20 16 , the Clerk of the Court is

hereby directed to close this file.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-12-00070-CV

Destry W. Kittman, Glendee Kittman and Martha S. Kittman, Appellants

v.

W. Shane Kittman, Donald E. Arthur and Gwen B. Arthur, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BURNET COUNTY, 33RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 36643, HONORABLE GUILFORD L. JONES III, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

The parties have filed a joint motion requesting a thirty-dayabatement to aid efforts to

resolve their dispute through settlement. We grant the motion and abate this appeal until February 1,

2016. On or before that date, the parties should either (as applicable) file a motion to reinstate and

for final disposition in accordance with their settlement or file a report advising the Court of the

status of the appeal and if any extension of the abatement is warranted.

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Goodwin

Abated

Filed: December 31, 2015
**EXHIBIT 32**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc. (the “Company”)for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, James F. Cleary, Jr. andMary Patricia B. Thompson, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to ourknowledge:

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities ExchangeAct of 1934; and

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periodsexpressed in the Report.

April 26, 2007
| /s/  James F. Cleary, Jr.     |
|-------------------------------|
| James F. Cleary, Jr.          |
| *Chief Executive Officer*     |
|                          |
|                          |
| /s/ Mary Patricia B. Thompson |
| Mary Patricia B. Thompson     |
| *Chief Financial Officer*     |

 

----
#### Blesso Plumbing and Heating Company, Inc. *v.*Renrew, Inc.

No appearance by counsel for either party.

Decided November 2, 1971

The motion by the plaintiff to dismiss the appeal from the Court of Common Pleas in Hartford County is dismissed.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Report: Evaluating Your Capacity for Impact Evaluation: A Guide for Public Child Welfare Agencies and Service Providers      

# Report: Evaluating Your Capacity for Impact Evaluation: A Guide for Public Child Welfare Agencies and Service Providers

This report (PDF, 22 pages) outlines the knowledge, skills, and resources needed for an impact evaluation to succeed. The report provides information on the following:  
                  -  Definition of impact evaluations  
                  -  What the evaluation process requires from an organization  
                  -  How to decide whether to use the resources, knowledge, and skills of people working in your organization or contract with an external evaluator  
                  -  How to know if your organization and intervention are ready for an impact evaluation  

**Learn more** (PDF, 22 pages).
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1435.300 Applicability. ( a ) This subpart applies to the establishment and allocation of marketing allotments for: ( 1 ) Processor marketings of sugar domestically processed from sugar beets or in-process beet sugar, whether such sugar beets or in-process beet sugar were produced domestically or imported,
( 2 ) Processor marketings of sugar processed from sugarcane,
( 3 ) Distribution of a processor's allocation to producers in proportionate share States, and
( 4 ) Harvesting sugarcane by producers subject to proportionate shares.
( b ) This subpart does not apply to marketing imported raw or refined sugar.
( c ) This subpart applies throughout the United States and Puerto Rico.
[67 FR 54928, Aug. 26, 2002, as amended at 74 FR 15365, Apr. 6, 2009]
#### Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company, Appellant, v Allstate Insurance Company et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered January 17, 1979, declaring that the loss in excess of the primary policy issued by Allstate against liability of One Eleven South Street No. 2, Inc., for injuries resulting from an automobile accident shall be shared by all excess carriers in proportion to the limit amount issued by each, is unanimously affirmed, with costs. The facts in this case are fully set forth in Special Term’s opinion (97 Mise 2d 229). We affirm for the reasons stated in that opinion while noting one minor factual error which does not change the result. Special Term said (p 231) that the "Executive” policy issued to Irwin Tantleff was an excess policy over an underlying policy listed in the Executive policy’s Schedule A, and that this underlying policy had been issued by Allstate to One Eleven South Street No. 2. In fact, the underlying policy had been issued by Allstate to Irwin’s wife Judith Tantleff as primary insurance on a BMW automobile. If the BMW had been involved in the accident, we would agree with appellant Lumbermens’ contention that Judith’s policy would have to be exhausted before the excess policies would be required to contribute to the settlement. However, the accident involved a Datsun owned and insured by One Eleven South Street No. 2, Inc., and $300,000 has already been contributed by Allstate toward the settlement as the primary insurer of that automobile and its owner under a different policy not at issue herein. The Allstate policy issued to Judith provided only excess coverage for the accident involving her son Jack who was driving a "non-owned automobile” as defined in her policy. As an excess coverage policy, it was in parity with the other excess policies involved herein. For the reasons stated by Special Term in its opinion, the loss in excess of that covered by the primary policy was properly declared to be shared by all excess insurers in proportion to the limit amount of insurance issued by each. (See *Atlantic Mut. Ins. Co. v Atlantic Nat. Ins. Co.,*38 AD2d 517, affd 33 NY2d 817; *Buckeye Union Ins. Co. v State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co.,*49 Ohio St 2d 213; Ann., 69 ALR2d 1122.) Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Sandler, Sullivan and Markewich, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 1955
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1955 appear at 80 FR 9895, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1955.138 Property subject to redemption rights. If, under State law, Rural Development's interest may be sold subject to redemption rights, the property may be sold provided there is no apparent likelihood of its being redeemed. ( a ) A credit sale of a program or suitable property subject to redemption rights may be made to a program applicant when the property meets the standards for the respective loan program. In areas where State law does not provide for full recovery of the cost of repairs during the redemption period, a program sale is generally precluded unless the property already meets program standards.
( b ) Each purchaser will sign a statement acknowledging that: ( 1 ) The property is subject to redemption rights according to State law, and
( 2 ) If the property is redeemed, ownership and possession of the property would revert to the previous owner and likely result in loss of any additional investment in the property not recoverable under the State's provisions of redemption.
( c ) The signed original statement will be filed in the purchaser's County or District Office case file.
( d ) If real estate brokers or auctioneers are engaged to sell the property, the County Supervisor or District Director will inform them of the redemption rights of the borrower and the conditions under which the property may be sold.
( e ) The State Director, with prior approval of OGC, will issue a State supplement incorporating the requirements of this section and providing additional guidance appropriate for the State.
[50 FR 23904, June 7, 1985, as amended at 53 FR 27837, July 25, 1988]
EXHIBIT 23


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  Registration  Statements
(Form S-3 No. 33- 58084) pertaining to 20,342,770  Common Shares;  (Form S-3 No.
333-15647)  pertaining  to  1,513,790  Common  Shares;  (Form S-8 No.  33-37398)
pertaining to the 1987 Stock Option Plan and (Form S-8 Nos.  33-58082,  33-90928
and  333-05659)  pertaining  to the 1992  Stock  Option  Plan  with  respect  to
2,250,000  Common Shares of AMNEX,  Inc. of our report dated April 4, 1997, with
respect to the consolidated  financial statements of AMNEX, Inc. included in its
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended  December 31, 1996,  filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.



                                                             ERNST & YOUNG LLP

New York, New York
April 11, 1997


<PAGE>
Exhibit 31.2

           CERTIFICATION BY PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER

I, Ilan M. Slasky, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of Ad.Venture  Partners,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

      a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c)  disclosed  in this  report  any  change in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual  report)  that  has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely  to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      a) all significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.


Date: November 14, 2005                      /s/ Ilan M. Slasky
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             Name:  Ilan M. Slasky
                                             Title: President