alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

      ( print page 70005)    
                    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following agreement under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit comments on the agreement to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within ten days of the date this notice appears in the                     **Federal Register**                    . A copy of the agreement is available through the Commission's Web site (                    *http://www.fmc.gov*) or by contacting the Office of Agreements at (202)-523-5793 or                     *tradeanalysis@fmc.gov.*

*Agreement No.:*                     201175-002.                

*Title:*                     Port of NY/NJ Sustainable Services Agreement.                

*Parties:*                     APM Terminals North America, Inc.; Global Terminal & Container Services LLC; Maher Terminals LLC; New York Container Terminal, Inc.; and Port Newark Container Terminal LLC.                

*Filing Party:*                     Carol N. Lambos, Esq.; The Lambos Firm, LLP; 303 South Broadway, Suite 410; Tarrytown, NY 10591                

*Synopsis:*                     The amendment would allow the parties to enter into an agreement with the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey to discuss and agree on matters relating to environmentally sensitive, efficient, and secure marine terminal operations, including RFID technology; obtain and administer government grants to fund technology-related activities; meet with stakeholders to discuss deployment of RFID technologies; and to establish and manage an entity to implement and administer agreements reached regarding RFID and/or other similar technologies. The parties have requested expedited review.                

By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

Dated: November 10, 2010.

Karen V. Gregory, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-28869 Filed 11-15-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7713
JEFFERY L. MANESS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CLERK OF COURT FOR THE NORTH CAROLINA SUPREME COURT AND ALL SITTING JUSTICES OF THE NORTH CAROLINA SUPREME COURT, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-97-659-BR3) Submitted: February 26, 1998 Decided: March 20, 1998 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jeffery L. Maness, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions have thirty days withinwhich to file in the district court notices of appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The only exceptions to the appeal period are when the district court extends the time to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The district court entered its order on September 25, 1997; Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on November 25, 1997, which is beyond the thirty-day appeal period. Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period leavesthis court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Appellant's appeal. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<XBRL>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<!--XBRL Document Created with Wdesk from Workiva-->
<!--Copyright 2022 Workiva-->
<!--r:6a688f0a-f0b2-474d-8e71-73a8cc4a6a49,g:de1a0ccd-be3f-4117-889d-a827c370aadf-->
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:link="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/linkbase" xmlns:ndsn="http://www.nordson.com/20220708" attributeFormDefault="unqualified" elementFormDefault="qualified" targetNamespace="http://www.nordson.com/20220708">
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xlink-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/instance" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xbrl-instance-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/linkbase" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xbrl-linkbase-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://xbrl.sec.gov/dei/2022" schemaLocation="https://xbrl.sec.gov/dei/2022/dei-2022.xsd"/>
  <xs:annotation>
    <xs:appinfo>
      <link:linkbaseRef xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:arcrole="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/properties/linkbase" xlink:href="ndsn-20220708_lab.xml" xlink:role="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/labelLinkbaseRef" xlink:type="simple"/>
      <link:linkbaseRef xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:arcrole="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/properties/linkbase" xlink:href="ndsn-20220708_pre.xml" xlink:role="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationLinkbaseRef" xlink:type="simple"/>
      <link:roleType id="Cover" roleURI="http://www.nordson.com/role/Cover">
        <link:definition>0001001 - Document - Cover</link:definition>
        <link:usedOn>link:presentationLink</link:usedOn>
        <link:usedOn>link:calculationLink</link:usedOn>
        <link:usedOn>link:definitionLink</link:usedOn>
      </link:roleType>
    </xs:appinfo>
  </xs:annotation>
</xs:schema>
</XBRL>
#### Ronald Morse et al., Appellants, v County of Herkimer et al., Defendants, and Town of Warren, Respondent.

(Appeal No. 1.)

— Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. (See *Bradshaw v Paduano,*55 AD2d 828.) (Appeal from order and judgment of Herkimer Supreme Court — automobile negligence.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Cardamone, Simons, Callahan and Moule, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
     I, Glenn A. Jackson, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-K/A of Boundless Motor Sports Racing, Inc. 2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this annual report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresas of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the“Evaluation Date”); and
c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls whichcould adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any materialweaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and
6.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly reportwhether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors thatcould significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recentevaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses.   Date: March 2, 2005 /s/ Glenn A. Jackson   Glenn A. Jackson, Chief Accounting Officer
#### Imparato Stevedoring Corp., Respondent-Appellant, v. Lloyd’s Underwriters et al., Appellants-Respondents.

Order, entered November 23, 1966, unanimously modified, on the law, to grant motion of defendants for summary judgment and order otherwise affirmed, with $50 costs and disburse-*828meats to defendants; and complaint dismissed, with costs. A condition of the excess public liability policies of insurance, issued by defendants, was that the “ Assured upon knowledge of any accident or occurrence likely to give rise to a claim hereunder shall give immediate written advice thereof ” to defendants’ named agent; and, as a matter of law, there was a failure on plaintiff’s part to comply with this condition. The plaintiff’s alleged cause of action upon the policies arises out of serious injuries sustained by Sergio De Gioia in an accident occurring on January 31, 1958. De Gioia brought suit against United States Lines Company to recover $250,000 for his injuries, and said company impleaded the plaintiff here and another, serving upon plaintiff on October 8, 1959 a third-party complaint charging it with negligence and seeking a recovery over as against it. On June 8, 1961, De Gioia recovered judgment of $80,000 against United States Lines Company, and on said day judgment in that amount was entered against the plaintiff and its co-third-party defendant on the third-party complaint. The plaihtiff, in October, 1959, had given notice of the accident to its primary insurer whose coverage was limited to $10,000 but it did not notify the defenadants of the accident or the third-party suit until July, 1961, about one month after judgment was recovered against plaintiff; and thereupon, the defendants disclaimed liability for failure of timely notification of the claim. Plaintiff, on the service of the third-party complaint on October 8, 1959, acquired knowledge of a claim against it and of the alleged seriousness of De Gioia’s injuries. Then it knew or should have known of the possibility of exposure in excess of the primary coverage of $10,000. The likelihood that the subject accident would give rise to a claim under defendants’ policies was then apparent or readily ascertainable by plaintiff with the exercise of due diligence. Under these circumstances, the delay of about 20 months (three and one-half years after the accident) in giving notice to the defendant insurers was unreasonable as a matter of law. (Cf. *Greyhound Corp.*v. *Excess Ins. Co. of Amer.,*233 F. 2d 630; *Peerless Ins. Co.*v. *Nationwide Ins. Co.,*12 A D 2d 602; *Hurlburt*v. *Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.,*26 A D 2d 600; *General Acc. Fire & Life Assur. Corp.*v. *Bongiorno,*6 A D 2d 896, affd. 8 N Y 2d 762.) The fact that the primary insurer duly attended to the defense of the third-party action against plaintiff constitutes no excuse for plaintiff’s failure to comply with the condition of the policies as to notice. (See *Greyhound Corp.*v. *Excess Ins. Co. of Amer., supra.)*Concur—Botein, P. J., Eager, Capozzoli, Tilzer and McNally, JJ.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsElectron beam induced damage in PECVD Si3N4 and SiO2 films on InPPhosphorus rich plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) of silicon nitride and silicon dioxide films on n-type indium phosphide (InP) substrates were exposed to electron beam irradiation in the 5 to 40 keV range for the purpose of characterizing the damage induced in the dielectic. The electron beam exposure was on the range of 10(exp -7) to 10(exp -3) C/sq cm. The damage to the devices was characterized by capacitance-voltage (C-V) measurements of the metal insulator semiconductor (MIS) capacitors. These results were compared to results obtained for radiation damage of thermal silicon dioxide on silicon (Si) MOS capacitors with similar exposures. The radiation induced damage in the PECVD silicon nitride films on InP was successfully annealed out in an hydrogen/nitrogen (H2/N2) ambient at 400 C for 15 min. The PECVD silicon dioxide films on InP had the least radiation damage, while the thermal silicon dioxide films on Si had the most radiation damage.Document ID19900011077Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeConference PaperAuthorsPantic, Dragan M.*(Cincinnati Univ. OH., United States)*Kapoor, Vik J.*(Cincinnati Univ. OH., United States)*Young, Paul G.*(Cincinnati Univ. OH., United States)*Williams, Wallace D.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH., United States)*Dickman, John E.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateMarch 1, 1990Subject CategoryMechanical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberE-5356NASA-TM-102544NAS 1.15:102544Meeting InformationMeeting: Dielectric Films on Compound Semiconductors SymposiumLocation: Honolulu, HICountry: United StatesStart Date: October 18, 1987End Date: October 23, 1987Sponsors:The Electrochemical SocietyAccession Number90N20393Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-44-21Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900011077.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
EXHIBIT 10.35

             FORGIVENESS OF PROMISSORY NOTE DATED NOVEMBER 17, 2006
              IN THE AMOUNT OF $6,300 PAYABLE TO MICHAEL A. BOWDEN




<PAGE>




                               MICHAEL A. BOWDEN
                                2945 YATES STREET
                             DENVER, COLORADO 80212





November 17, 2006




Pedro E. Racelis III (Pete)
China Wireless Communications, Inc.
1746 Cole Boulevard, Suite 225
Golden, Colorado 80401

Subject:  Forgive Loan (Convertible Note #5, Dated July 23, 2006, $6,300.00USD)

Dear Pete:

As an officer of the company, I understand the financial situation of the
company and I hereby forgive the loan totaling $6,300.000USD, Convertible Note
#5, to China Wireless Communications, Inc. effective immediately.

Sincerely,


/s/ MICHAEL A. BOWDEN
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

MICHAEL DANIEL MIDGETT,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:20cv404/RV/EMT

UNITED STATES FEDERAL BUREAU

OF INVESTIGATIONS,

Defendant.

__________________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge’s 

Report and Recommendation dated April 7, 2020 (ECF No. 9). Plaintiff has been 

furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to 

file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No 

objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined the 

Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and 

incorporated by reference in this order.

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to 

comply with an order of the court.

Case 3:20-cv-00404-RV-EMT Document 10 Filed 05/07/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:20cv404/RV/EMT

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 7th day of May, 2020.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:20-cv-00404-RV-EMT Document 10 Filed 05/07/20 Page 2 of 2
Form of Contingent
Stock Incentive Award

Health Management
Associates, Inc.
5811 Pelican Bay Boulevard, Suite 500
Naples, Florida 34108-2710

(Date)

(Name and Address of
Award Recipient)

The
Company is pleased to inform you that on [                    ], you
were awarded [          ] shares of HMA
Class A Common Stock under the Companys 1996 Executive Incentive Compensation
Plan (the Plan).  This award is
intended to provide a very tangible incentive to you for future performance on
behalf of the Company.

The
above number of shares is being credited to your account under the Plan, and
you will be vested in and receive the shares on the fourth anniversary of the
date of the award, provided you are still an employee of HMA.  All the terms and conditions of your grant
are governed by the Plan as approved by stockholders.

The
Company is very pleased to offer you this additional incentive and looks
forward to your continued outstanding performance as a key manager.

Very truly yours,



---

---
EXHIBIT 32.1


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


         In connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Morgan Creek Energy Corp.
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ending  September  30, 2006 as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I,  Marcus M.  Johnson,  Chief  Executive  Officer  of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: November 10, 2006



                                        By: /s/ MARCUS M. JOHNSON
                                            _____________________________
                                                Marcus M. Johnson
                                                President and Chief
                                                Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of American Tire Distributors Holdings, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his best knowledge:



| | (a) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 4, 2009 (the Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |     |  |                      |  |        |  |                                                     
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------- |  | ------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 18, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/ WILLIAM E. BERRY
|                       |  |     |  |                      |  | Name:  |  | William E. Berry                                    
|                       |  |     |  |                      |  | Title: |  | President and Chief Executive Officer               
|                       |  |    
|                       |  | By: |  | /s/ DAVID L. DYCKMAN
|                       |  |     |  |                      |  | Name:  |  | David L. Dyckman                                    
|                       |  |     |  |                      |  | Title: |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 01-20457

Summary Calendar

__________________

LINDA D. LESLIE,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

CITY OF HOUSTON,

Defendant-Appellee.

______________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Texas

(H-99-CV-4148)

______________________________________________

October 1, 2001

Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellant Linda Leslie appeals from an adverse summary

judgment dismissing her pregnancy discrimination claim against the

City of Houston. After reviewing the briefs and the record on

appeal, we affirm the judgment of the district court for the

reasons set forth in the memorandum and opinion signed by Judge

Rosenthal on March 30, 2001.
2

AFFIRMED
#### §§ 1970.157-1970.200 [Reserved]