### 77003 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 246 / Tuesday, December 23, 2014 / Notices

Respondent’s obligation to respond: Required for any importer to legally import nonroad vehicles or engines into the U.S.

Estimated number of respondents: 12,000.

Total estimated burden: 6,029 hours (per year). Burden is defined at 5 CFR 1320.03(b).

Total estimated cost: $410,178 (per year), which includes $38,002 annualized capital or operation & maintenance costs.

Changes in Estimates: This is no change the total estimated respondent burden compared with the ICR currently approved by OMB.

Courtney Kerwin, Acting Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 2014–30016 Filed 12–22–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**[FRL–9920–56–OEI]**

**Cross-Media Electronic Reporting: Authorized Program Revision**  **Approval, San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District** 

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  This notice announces EPA’s approval of the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District’s request to revise its State Operating Permit Programs EPA-authorized program to allow electronic reporting.

**DATES :**  EPA’s approval is effective December 23, 2014.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Karen Seeh, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Information, Mail Stop 2823T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460, (202) 566–1175, seeh.karen@epa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  On October 13, 2005, the final Cross-Media Electronic Reporting Rule (CROMERR) was published in the Federal Register (70 FR 59848) and codified as part 3 of title 40 of the CFR. CROMERR establishes electronic reporting as an acceptable regulatory alternative to paper reporting and establishes requirements to assure that electronic documents are as legally dependable as their paper counterparts. Subpart D of CROMERR requires that state, tribal or local government agencies that receive, or wish to begin receiving, electronic reports under their EPA-authorized programs must apply to EPA for a revision or modification of those programs and obtain EPA approval. Subpart D provides standards for such approvals based on consideration of the electronic document receiving systems that the state, tribe, or local government will use to implement the electronic reporting. Additionally, § 3.1000(b) through (e) of 40 CFR part 3, subpart D provides special procedures for program revisions and modifications to allow electronic reporting, to be used at the option of the state, tribe or local government in place of proceduresavailable under existing programspecific authorization regulations. An application submitted under the subpart D procedures must show that the state, tribe or local government has sufficient legal authority to implement the electronic reporting components of the programs covered by the application and will use electronic document receiving systems that meet the applicable subpart D requirements.

On February 3, 2012, the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District (SJVAPCD) submitted an application entitled ‘‘San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Title V Electronic Reporting System’’ for revision of its EPA-authorized authorized Part 70 program under title 40 CFR. EPA reviewed SJVAPCD’s request to revise its EPA-authorized Part 70—State Operating Permit Programs program and, based on this review, EPA determined that the application met the standards for approval of authorized program revision set out in 40 CFR part 3, subpart D. In accordance with 40 CFR 3.1000(d), this notice of EPA’s decision to approve the District’s request to revise its Part 70—State Operating Permit Programs program to allow electronic reporting under 40 CFR part 70 is being published in the Federal Register

.

SJVAPCD was notified of EPA’s determination to approve its application with respect to the authorized program listed above.

Matthew Leopard, Acting Director, Office of Information Collection.
[FR Doc. 2014–30036 Filed 12–22–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION**  **AGENCY**

**[FRL–9920–78–ORD]**

**Environmental Laboratory Advisory Board (ELAB) Meeting Dates and**  **Agenda**

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Notice of teleconference and face-to-face meetings.

**SUMMARY :**  The Environmental Protection Agency’s Environmental Laboratory Advisory Board (ELAB), as previously announced, holds teleconference meetings the third Wednesday of eachmonth at 1:00 p.m. ET and two face-toface meetings each calendar year. For 2015, teleconference only meetings will be January 21, 2015 at 1:00 p.m. ET; March 18, 2015 at 1:00 p.m. ET; April 15, 2015 at 1:00 p.m. ET; May 20, 2015 at 1:00 p.m. ET; June 17, 2015 at 1:00 p.m. ET; August 19, 2015 at 1:00 p.m. ET; September 16, 2015 at 1:00 p.m. ET; October 21, 2015 at 1:00 p.m. ET; November 18, 2015 at 1:00 p.m. ET; and December 16, 2015 at 1:00 p.m. ET to discuss the ideas and views presented at the previous ELAB meetings, as well as new business. Items to be discussed by ELAB over these coming meetings include: (1) Issues in continuing the expansion of national environmental accreditation; (2) ELAB support to the Agency on issues relating to measurement and monitoring for all programs; and (3) follow-up on some of ELAB’s past recommendations and issues. In addition to these teleconferences, ELAB will be hosting their two face-to-face meetings with teleconference line also available on February 2, 2015 at the Hyatt Regency Crystal City in Crystal City, VA at 1:00 p.m. (ET) and on July 13, 2015 at the Hyatt Regency Chicago in Chicago, IL at 1:00 p.m. (CT).

Written comments on laboratory accreditation issues and/or environmental monitoring or measurement issues are encouraged and should be sent to Ms. Lara P. Phelps, DFO, US EPA (E243–05), 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 or emailed to phelps.lara@epa.gov. Members of the public are invited to listen to the teleconference calls, and time permitting, will be allowed to comment on issues discussed during this and previous ELAB meetings.

Those persons interested in attending should call Lara P. Phelps at (919) 541– 5544 to obtain teleconference information. For information on access or services for individuals with


### 77004 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 246 / Tuesday, December 23, 2014 / Notices

disabilities, please contact Lara P. Phelps at the number above, preferably at least 10 days prior to the meeting, to give EPA as much time as possible to process your request.

Dated: December 10, 2014. Robert Kavlock,
Interim EPA Science Advisor.
[FR Doc. 2014–30090 Filed 12–22–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**[FRL 9920–79–OGC]**

**Proposed Settlement Agreement**

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Notice of Proposed Settlement Agreement; Request for Public Comment.

**SUMMARY :**  In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘Act’’), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement agreement to address lawsuits filed by Oxy Vinyls, LP; The Vinyl Institute, Inc. (‘‘Vinyl Institute’’); PolyOne Corp. (now,Mexichem Specialty Resins, Inc.); SaintGobain Corp. and CertainTeed Corp. (collectively ‘‘Petitioners’’) in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (Case Nos. 12–1260, 12–1265, 12–1266, and 12– 1267). Between June 14, 2012 and June 18, 2012, Petitioners filed petitions for review of EPA’s final rule entitled ‘‘National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers Production,’’ (April 17, 2012). The proposed settlement agreement establishes deadlines for EPA to take action.

**DATES :**  Written comments on the proposed settlement agreement must be received by January 22, 2015.

**ADDRESSES :**  Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID number EPA– HQ–OGC–2014–0899, online at www.regulations.gov (EPA’s preferred method); by email to oei.docket@
epa.gov; by mail to EPA Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mailcode: 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001; or by hand delivery or courier to EPA Docket Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC, between 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. Comments on a disk or CD–ROM should be formatted in Word or ASCII file, avoiding the use of special characters and any form of encryption, and may be mailed to the mailing address above.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Mark M. Kataoka, Air and Radiation Law Office (2344A), Office of General Counsel, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone: (202) 564–5584; fax number (202) 564–5603; email address: kataoka.mark@epa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 
I. Additional Information About the Proposed Settlement Agreement

The proposed settlement agreement will partially resolve lawsuits seeking review of EPA’s final rule entitled ‘‘National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Polyvinyl Chloride and Copolymers Production,’’ 77 FR 22848, April 17, 2012, (‘‘PVC NESHAP’’ or ‘‘2012 Rule). On June 18, 2012, Petitioner Vinyl Institute and others petitioned for reconsideration and to stay the 2012 Rule pending reconsideration with EPA, and on September 28, 2012, EPA granted administrative reconsideration of the 2012 Rule on at least Petitioners’ claims that the public was not afforded a reasonable opportunity to comment on emission limits in the final 2012 Rule for process wastewater. The proposed settlement agreement states that no later than January 21, 2015, EPA will sign a direct final rule and parallel proposal withdrawing the total non-vinyl chloride organic hazardous air pollutant (‘‘TOHAP’’) process wastewater emission limits for new and existing area sources. The proposed settlement agreement provides that to the extent that EPA establishes new TOHAP process wastewater emission limits for existing and new area sources, those emission limits will be set pursuant to the reconsideration process or other separate rulemaking, and not through the direct final or final rule described in the settlement agreement. Under the proposed settlement agreement, if EPA receives adverse comments on and withdraws the direct final rule, EPA will make its best efforts to sign a notice taking final action on the parallel proposal within 15 days of the close of the comment period. In addition, the proposed settlement agreement states that Oxy Vinyls, LP will move to dismiss its petition for review, and the remaining Petitioners will move to dismiss the issue of the existing and new area source TOHAP process wastewater emission limits from their petitions for review within 7 days following the effective date of the direct final rule or a final rule withdrawing the existing and new area source TOHAP process wastewater limits. Nothing in the proposed settlement agreement limits or modifies EPA’s discretion under the Clean Air Act in either the related direct final rulemaking process or otherwise.

For a period of thirty (30) days following the date of publication of this notice, the Agency will accept written comments relating to the proposed settlement agreement from persons who were not named as parties or intervenors to the litigation in question. EPA or the Department of Justice may withdraw or withhold consent to the proposed settlement agreement if the comments disclose facts or considerations that indicate that such consent is inappropriate, improper, inadequate, or inconsistent with the requirements of the Act. Unless EPA or the Department of Justice determines that consent to this settlement agreement should be withdrawn, the terms of the agreement will be affirmed.

II. Additional Information About Commenting on the Proposed Settlement Agreement A. How can I get a copy of the settlement agreement?

The official public docket for this action (identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OGC–2014–0899) contains a copy of the proposed settlement agreement. The official public docket is available for public viewing at the Office of Environmental Information (OEI) Docket in the EPA Docket Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and the telephone number for the OEI Docket is (202) 566–
1752.

An electronic version of the public docket is available through www.regulations.gov. You may use the www.regulations.gov to submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the official public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically. Once in the system, key in the appropriate docket identification number then select ‘‘search’’.

It is important to note that EPA’s policy is that public comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made available for public viewing online at www.regulations.gov without change, unless the comment contains copyrighted material, CBI, or