alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Winslow Hunter, Appellant.

Appeal from judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered September 7, 1978, convicting defendant of attempted robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him to an indeterminate term of three and one-half to seven years, held in abeyance, counsel’s motion to be relieved denied with leave to renew, and counsel directed to proceed as hereinafter indicated. Motion by defendant, *pro se,*to relieve counsel denied, as academic. After counsel ascertained that no nonfrivolous issues existed, he notified defendant that defendant could seek new counsel or submit a supplementary brief. Consequently, defendant moved to relieve counsel. In *People v Saunders*(52 AD2d 833) this court established the procedure to be followed when an appeal is deemed wholly frivolous. The only option available to a defendant under *Saunders*is the opportunity to submit a supplementary brief. Thus, counsel’s advice that new counsel could be sought was incorrect. We are aware that defendant himself informed counsel that he was unaware of the existence of any appealable issues. But since this communication was made before counsel prepared and filed his brief, a copy of which he transmitted to defendant, defendant has never been afforded the opportunity, pursuant to *Saunders,*to file a brief supplementary to counsel’s. Counsel is directed to advise defendant that if he wishes to submit a supplementary brief, he must do so within 60 days after the entry of the order hereon. Concur—Fein, J. P., Sandler, Sullivan, Bloom and Lupiano, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1951

#### Editorial Notes:

1. Some of the exhibits referenced in this part 1951 are not published in the Code of Federal Regulations. Exhibits are available in any Rural Development office.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1951 appear at 80 FR 9890-9894, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1951.207 State supplements.

State supplements developed to carry out the provisions of this subpart will be prepared in accordance with subpart B of part 2006 of this chapter (available in any Rural Development office) and applicable State laws and regulations. State supplements are to be used only when required by National Instructions or necessary to clarify the impact of State laws or regulations, and not to restate the provisions of National Instructions. Advice and guidance will be obtained as needed from the Office of the General Counsel (OGC).
§ 1735.14 Borrower eligibility. ( a ) RUS makes loans to: ( 1 ) Entities providing, or who may hereafter provide, telephone service in rural areas;
( 2 ) Public bodies providing telephone service in rural areas as of October 28, 1949; and
( 3 ) Cooperative, nonprofit, limited dividend or mutual associations.
( 4 ) For purposes of § 1735.10(a)(2): ( i ) Any entity eligible to borrow from the RUS;
( ii ) State or local governments;
( iii ) Indian Tribes (as defined in § 4 of the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450b); or
( iv ) An emergency communications equipment provider that in the sole discretion of RUS offers adequate security for a loan where the State or local government that has jurisdiction over the proposed project is prohibited by law from acquiring debt.
( b ) RUS does not make loans to individuals.
( c ) RUS gives preference to those borrowers (including initial loan applicants) already providing telephone service in rural areas, and to cooperative, nonprofit, limited dividend, or mutual associations. To be eligible for a loan, a borrower: ( 1 ) Must have sufficient authority to carryout the purposes of the RE Act; and
( 2 ) Must be incorporated or a limited liability company.
[58 FR 66253, Dec. 20, 1993, as amended at 64 FR 50429, Sept. 17, 1999; 65 FR 42619, July 11, 2000; 76 FR 56094, Sept. 13, 2011]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal Nos. 10-46]

# AGENCY:

Defense Security Cooperation Agency, Department of Defense.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601-3740.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittals 10-46 with attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

Dated: November 9, 2010.

Morgan F. Park,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 69932)          ( print page 69933)          ( print page 69934)          ( print page 69935)          ( print page 69936)          ( print page 69937)          ( print page 69938)    

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P

[FR Doc. 2010-28769 Filed 11-15-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
,._ ^^HTMENT OF 

SERVED FEBRURY 11, 201 1 : :'^r C#S(T10N S 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAfidW' ' ' '"^ 2" ^0 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASfflNGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

CISCO AVIATION, LLC 

FAADOCKET NO. CPllSWOOOl 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS NO. FAA-2011-0060 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2009SW170129) has been assigned to 

Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin, All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

persons on the attached Service List. 

Ronnie A. Yoder, 

Chief Administrative 

Attachment - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CPl 1 SWOOOl 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SieRYICELIST 

ORIGO ^ 4^ ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suit^ 2Wl000^ 

ONIJCOPY 

George E. Crow, Respondent's Counsel 

Law Office of George E. Crow 

Aviation Law Firm 

P.O. Box 30 

Katy, TX 77492-0030 

TEL: 281-391-9275 

Clyde E Barton, Manager 

Cisco Aviation, LLC 

16055 Space Center Blvd., Suite 235 

Houston, TX 77062-6212 

Yolanda Ayala Bernal, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Safety Enforcement Branch 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Southwest Region, ASW-7E3 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 

Fort Worth, TX 76137 

TEL: 817-222-5070 

FAX: 817-222-5945 or 5092 

i 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodvwn, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 Legal Assistant FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENSACOLA DIVISION 

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCTS

 Case No. 3:19md2885 

LIABILITY LITIGATION 

This Document Relates to: 

Wilkerson, 7:20cv35 

 

Judge M. Casey Rodgers 

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones 

EXHIBITS ORDER NO. 2 

This Order addresses Plaintiff’s objections to exhibits identified on 

Defendants’ first priority exhibit list dated February 15, 2022. The Court’s rulings 

are set forth and highlighted in the attached Exhibit A. 

SO ORDERED this 12th day of March, 2022. 

 

 M. CASEY RODGERS 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 7:20-cv-00035-MCR-GRJ Document 146 Filed 03/12/22 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT 4.7**
 
 WAIVER AND EXTENSION
 
 Reference is hereby made to that certain Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of July 20, 2004 (the "Registration Rights Agreement"), by and among Boundless Motor Sports Racing, Inc., a Colorado corporation (the "Company"), and each of the undersigned parties (each, a "Purchaser", and collectively, the "Purchasers"). Terms used herein but not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Registration Rights Agreement.
 
 The Company has not filed a Registration Statement covering all of the Registrable Securities, and because of the SEC rules will not be able to file such Registration Statement without including the Company's consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004, which financial statements the Company anticipates being completed by December 14, 2004, at which time the Company anticipates filing the above referenced Registration Statement. The failure to file the Registration Statement by the Filing Date, and the anticipated failure of the Company to have the Registration Statement declared effective by the Effectiveness Date, has and will cause the Company to be liable for certain liquidated damages as provided for in Section 7(e) of the Registration Statement (collectively, the "Damages").
 
 Purchasers hereby waive all Damages which have accrued or will accrue through December 14, 2004 under Section 7(e) of the Registration Rights Agreement. In addition, Purchasers Agree that the Filing Date shall be December 17, 2004 and the Effectiveness Date, for purposes of Section 7(e) of the Registration Statement, shall be February 17, 2004.
 
 Dated as of November 15, 2004.
  BOUNDLESS MOTORS SPORTS RACING, INC.By:
/s/ Paul A. KrugerPaul A. KrugerChief Executive Officer
 PURCHASERS:
 NORTH SOUND LEGACY FUND, L.L.C.By:
/s/ Thomas McAuleyThomas McAuleyChief Investment Officer
 
 
 SDS CAPITAL GROUP SPC, LTD.By:
/s/ Scott E. DerbyScott E. DerbyGeneral Counsel (For SDS Class A)
  SDS CAPITAL GROUP SPC, LTD.By:
/s/ Scott E. DerbyScott E. DerbyGeneral Counsel (For SDS Class B)
   
 1
 
 NORTH SOUND LEGACY INTERNATIONAL, LTD.By:
/s/ Thomas McAuleyThomas McAuleyChief Investment Officer
 
 
 
 NORTH SOUND LEGACY INSTITUTIONAL FUND, L.L.C.By:
/s/ Thomas McAuleyThomas McAuleyChief Investment Officer
 
 
 
 2
#### W. R. W. Building Corp., Appellant, v. Waldan Corp., Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated December 6, 1966, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Order of said court dated September 29, 1966 dismissed, as academic, without costs. That order was superseded by the order dated December 6, 1966, which granted reargument. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 USC, SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the  quarterly  report of Northern  Ethanol,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the six month period ended June 30, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, the undersigned,  in the capacity and on the date indicated  below,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated: August 14, 2006                   s/Ciaran Griffin
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Ciaran Griffin, Chief Financial Officer
#### The Commonwealth vs. Griffin.

füBICTMENT. Case 169,

Error to the Shelby Circuit; Todd, Judge-

*Slaves, importation of into this state.*

The bringing of aslaveinto Kentucky, by *589a ner<on not protected fay any of the exceptions in the statute of IS‘5, altho’ ' he intends to ex, ort, and alt or wards exports l ho slave to another --tate for s- le, is an *importation*in-fa- ini- state in violation of • that statute.

*588October 20.

Chief Justice Robertson

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

This is an indictment for illegally importing a female slave into this state. On the trial, the attorney for the Commonwealth moved for sundry instructions, all of which the court refused to *589give, and thereupon verdict and judgment were rendered for the defendant in error.

The importation of a slave into this state for any purpose or by any person not authorized by the statute of 1815, is an indictable of-fence.

«71 *forehead, Attorney General,*for Commonwealth; *Richardson,*for defendant.

The instructions as, offered, when reduced to their true effect as applicable to the facts proved, may he resolved into one isolated question; and that is, whether the bringing of a slave to Kentucky, by a person not protected by any of the exceptions in the statute of 1815, II Dig. 1163, intending to export, and afterwards actually exporting the slave to another state for sale, is an *importation*into this state, in violation of that statute? -

We are satisfied that the importation of a slave into this state, for any purpose, or by any person not authorized by the statute of 1815, is an indictable offence. If the defendant actually imported a slave, not for his own use, if he did not obtain tho slave by descent, devise, or marriage, or if he was not a sojourner, “using the slave for necessary attendance,” he was guilty of a violation of the act of 1815, whether he sold the slave or not, or whether he kept her here or sent her elsewhere. There was no attempt to prove that the defendant was an emigrant to this state; but it was proved that he was a citizen of Kentucky; consequently, the circuit court erred in not instructing the jury, as asked, that a sale in this state wqs not indispensable to conviction, and that if the defendant *“bought*the slave in Virginia, and brought her to this state, without having acquired her by marriage, descent, or devise, and not for his own use, and that he was not a traveller passing through the state, they should find for the Commonwealth.” The facts conduced to prove every thing hypothetically assumed in the foregoing proposition.

Wherefore, the judgment of the circuit court is reversed, the verdict set aside, and the cause remanded for a new trial.
FannieMae2012 10K EX 10.16 AmendmenttoExecPensionPlaneffective11202007




EXHIBIT 10.16 


FANNIE MAE 
EXECUTIVE PENSION PLAN 


     Pursuant to Section 20 of the Fannie Mae Executive Pension Plan (the “Plan”), Fannie Mae hereby amends the Plan, effective November 20, 2007, to provide that, notwithstanding any provision of the Plan to the contrary, no individual shall become a Participant after November 20, 2007.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1951

#### Editorial Notes:

1. Some of the exhibits referenced in this part 1951 are not published in the Code of Federal Regulations. Exhibits are available in any Rural Development office.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1951 appear at 80 FR 9890-9894, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1951.152 Definition.

As used in this subpart:

*Mortgage.* Includes real estate mortgage, deed of trust or any other form of security instrument or lien on real property.
2006-0480.

#### State v. Cummings.

Stark App. No. 2005CA00297. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton and O’Connor, JJ., dissent.
Case 7:20-cv-02945-MCR-HTC Document 20-18 Filed 08/09/22 Page 1 of 4
Case 7:20-cv-02945-MCR-HTC Document 20-18 Filed 08/09/22 Page 2 of 4
Case 7:20-cv-02945-MCR-HTC Document 20-18 Filed 08/09/22 Page 3 of 4
Case 7:20-cv-02945-MCR-HTC Document 20-18 Filed 08/09/22 Page 4 of 4
**EXHIBIT 31.2****Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**I, Bradley Bertouille, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Standard Aero Holdings, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present inall material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by the reportbased on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.   Dated:May 12, 2006     /s/ Bradley Bertouille     Bradley Bertouille  Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT**The undersigned officer of **Standard Aero Holdings, Inc.**hereby certifies pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to such officer’s knowledge that: 1. the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Standard Aero Holdings, Inc. for the quarterended March 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of Standard Aero Holdings, Inc.Date: May15, 2007         By: /s/ David Shaw           Name: David Shaw    Title: Chief Executive Officer  The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether madebefore or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE 

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING 

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. 

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA 

In The Supreme Court 

The State, Respondent, 

v. 

Christopher Ryan Whitehead, Petitioner. 

Appellate Case No. 2012-213683 

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS 

Appeal from Kershaw County 

G. Thomas Cooper, Jr., Circuit Court Judge 

Memorandum Opinion No. 2015-MO-033 

Heard December 11, 2014 – Filed June 10, 2015 

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED 

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant, of 

Columbia, for Petitioner. 

Attorney General Alan M. Wilson, Chief Deputy 

Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Senior Assistant 

Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, Senior 

Assistant Attorney General Melody J. Brown, and 
 

Solicitor Daniel E. Johnson, all of Columbia, for the 

Respondent. 

JUSTICE KITTREDGE: We granted a writ of certiorari to review the court of 

appeals' unpublished opinion in State v. Whitehead, Op. No. 2012-UP-526 (S.C. 

Ct. App. filed Sept. 12, 2012). For the reasons set forth in State v. McDonald, 412 

S.C. 133, 771 S.E.2d 840 (2015), we affirm as modified. While the admission of 

the codefendants' statements violated the Confrontation Clause,1

 in view of the 

overwhelming evidence of guilt, the error was harmless. 

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED. 

TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY and HEARN, JJ., concur. 

1

 U.S. Const. amend. VI; see Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 (1968).
#### § 201.31 Minimum germination standards for vegetable seeds in interstate commerce.

The following minimum germination standards for vegetable seeds in interstate commerce, which shall be construed to include hard seed, are determined and established under section 403(c) of the Act:

| | Percent |
| --- | --- |
| Artichoke | 60 |
| Asparagus | 70 |
| Asparagusbean | 75 |
| Bean, garden | 70 |
| Bean, lima | 70 |
| Bean, runner | 75 |
| Beet | 65 |
| Broadbean | 75 |
| Broccoli | 75 |
| Brussels sprouts | 70 |
| Burdock, great | 60 |
| Cabbage | 75 |
| Cabbage, tronchuda | 70 |
| Cardoon | 60 |
| Carrot | 55 |
| Cauliflower | 75 |
| Celeriac | 55 |
| Celery | 55 |
| Chard, Swiss | 65 |
| Chicory | 65 |
| Chinese cabbage | 75 |
| Chives | 50 |
| Citron | 65 |
| Collards | 80 |
| Corn, sweet | 75 |
| Cornsalad | 70 |
| Cowpea | 75 |
| Cress, garden | 75 |
| Cress, upland | 60 |
| Cress, water | 40 |
| Cucumber | 80 |
| Dandelion | 60 |
| Dill | 60 |
| Eggplant | 60 |
| Endive | 70 |
| Kale | 75 |
| Kale, Chinese | 75 |
| Kale, Siberian | 75 |
| Kohlrabi | 75 |
| Leek | 60 |
| Lettuce | 80 |
| Melon | 75 |
| Mustard, India | 75 |
| Mustard, spinach | 75 |
| Okra | 50 |
| Onion | 70 |
| Onion, Welsh | 70 |
| Pak-choi | 75 |
| Parsley | 60 |
| Parsnip | 60 |
| Pea | 80 |
| Pepper | 55 |
| Pumpkin | 75 |
| Radish | 75 |
| Rhubarb | 60 |
| Rutabaga | 75 |
| Sage | 60 |
| Salsify | 75 |
| Savory, summer | 55 |
| Sorrel | 65 |
| Soybean | 75 |
| Spinach | 60 |
| Spinach, New Zealand | 40 |
| Squash | 75 |
| Tomato | 75 |
| Tomato, husk | 50 |
| Turnip | 80 |
| Watermelon | 70 |

[59 FR 64491, Dec. 14, 1994, as amended at 85 FR 40580, July 7, 2020]