alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 USC, SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the  quarterly  report of Northern  Ethanol,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the nine month period ended September 30, 2006, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"), I, the undersigned,  in the capacity and on the date indicated below,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated:  November 20, 2006                 s/Richard Smith
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Richard Smith, Chief Financial Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENSACOLA DIVISION 

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCTS

 Case No. 3:19md2885 

LIABILITY LITIGATION 

This Document Relates to: 

Vilsmeyer, 7:20cv113 

 

Judge M. Casey Rodgers 

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones 

DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS ORDER NO. 6 

 This Order addresses Plaintiff’s objections and counter-designations to 

Defendants’ affirmative deposition designations and Defendants’ objections to 

Plaintiff’s counter-designations thereto for the following witness deposition:

1. O’Mealy, Todd (12/7/2021) 

SO ORDERED this 11th day of March, 2022. 

 M. CASEY RODGERS 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 7:20-cv-00113-MCR-GRJ Document 114 Filed 03/11/22 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 27 (Wednesday, February 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6728-6729]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-2890]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD


The Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) is Providing Notice of 
the Opportunity to File Amicus Briefs in the Matters of Conyers v. 
Department of Defense, Docket No. CH-0752-09-0925-I-1, and Northover v. 
Department of Defense, Docket No. AT-0752-10-0184-I-1

AGENCY: Merit Systems Protection Board.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On January 25, 2010, the MSPB published in the Federal 
Register (see 75 FR 3939) a Notice of the opportunity to file amicus 
briefs in the matter of Crumpler v. Department of Defense, MSPB Docket 
Number DC-0752-09-0033-R-1, 2009 MSPB 233. Although the Crumpler case 
is now settled, the legal issue raised in that matter and noted in the 
January 25 Federal Register notice remains unresolved. The cases of 
Conyers v. Department of Defense, Docket No. CH-0752-09-0925-I-1, and 
Northover v. Department of Defense, Docket No. AT-0752-10-0184-I-1, 
involve the same legal issue.
    Conyers and Northover raise the question of whether, pursuant to 5 
CFR Part 732, National Security Position, the rule in Department of the 
Navy v. Egan, 484 U.S. 518, 530-31 (1988), limiting the scope of MSPB 
review of an adverse action based on the revocation of a security 
clearance also applies to an adverse action involving an employee in a 
``non-critical sensitive'' position due to the employee having been 
denied continued eligibility for employment in a sensitive position.
    Interested parties may submit amicus briefs or other comments on 
this issue no later than March 1, 2010. Amicus briefs must be filed 
with the Clerk of the Board. Briefs shall not exceed 15 pages in 
length. The text shall be double-spaced, except for quotations and 
footnotes, and the briefs shall be on 8\1/2\; by 11 inch paper with one 
inch margins on all four sides.

[[Page 6729]]


DATES: All briefs submitted in response to this notice shall be filed 
with the Clerk of the Board on or before March 1, 2010.

ADDRESSES: All briefs shall be entitled ``Amicus Brief, Conyers and 
Northover.'' Only one copy of the brief need be submitted. Briefs must 
be filed with the Office of the Clerk of the Board, Merit Systems 
Protection Board, 1615 M Street, NW., Washington, DC 20419.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matthew Shannon, Deputy Clerk of the 
Board, (202) 653-7200.

    Dated: February 4, 2010.
William D. Spencer,
Clerk of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-2890 Filed 2-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7400-01-P
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1794 

To amend the Emergency Food Assistance Act of 1983 to provide for the 

increased purchase of Kosher and Halal food and to modify the labeling 

of the commodities list under the emergency food assistance program 

to enable Kosher and Halal food bank operators to identify which commodities to obtain from local food banks. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2013 

Mr. CROWLEY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Emergency Food Assistance Act of 1983 to 

provide for the increased purchase of Kosher and Halal 

food and to modify the labeling of the commodities list 

under the emergency food assistance program to enable 

Kosher and Halal food bank operators to identify which 

commodities to obtain from local food banks. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Halal and Kosher Food 

5 Act of 2013’’. 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1794 IH

1 SEC. 2. PURCHASE OF HALAL AND KOSHER FOOD FOR 

2 EMERGENCY FOOD ASSISTANCE PROGRAM. 

3 Section 202 of the Emergency Food Assistance Act 

4 of 1983 (7 U.S.C. 7502) is amended by adding at the end 

5 the following: 

6 ‘‘(h) KOSHER AND HALAL FOOD.—As soon as prac7 ticable after the date of enactment of this subsection, the 

8 Secretary shall finalize and implement a plan— 

9 ‘‘(1) to increase the purchase of Kosher and 

10 Halal food from food manufacturers with a Kosher 

11 or Halal certification to carry out the program es12 tablished under this Act if the Kosher and Halal 

13 food purchased is cost neutral as compared to food 

14 that is not from food manufacturers with a Kosher 

15 or Halal certification; and 

16 ‘‘(2) to modify the labeling of the commodities 

17 list used to carry out the program in a manner that 

18 enables Kosher and Halal food bank operators to 

19 identify which commodities to obtain from local food 

20 banks.’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit (32.2)





HARLEYSVILLE GROUP INC.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Harleysville Group Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bruce J. Magee, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







|Date:  March 11, 2005 |  | /s/BRUCEJ. MAGEE                                 
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | Bruce J. Magee                                   
|                      |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
98-913.

#### State v. Green.

Lucas C.P. No. 971450. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Lucas County. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion to appoint Ohio Public Defender as co-counsel,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion be, and hereby is, granted, and the Ohio Public Defender is appointed as co-counsel.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that appellant’s brief shall be due ninety days from the date of this order and the parties shall otherwise proceed in accordance with S.Ct.Prac.R. XIX.
Editorial Note on Part 1940
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1940 appear at 80 FR 9876, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1940.962 Authority to transfer direct loan amounts. ( a ) *Transfer of funds.* If the amounts allocated to a designated State for direct Water and Waste Disposal or Community Facility loans for a FY are not sufficient to provide the full amount requested for a project in accordance with this subpart, the State Director may transfer part or all of the funds allocated to the State, from one program to another, subject to paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
( b ) *Limitation on amounts transferred.* ( 1 ) Amounts transferred within a designated State. The amount of direct loan funds transferred from a program under this section shall not exceed the amount left unobligated after obligating the full amount of assistance requested for each project that ranked higher in priority on the panel's list.
( 2 ) Amounts transferred on a National basis. The amount of direct loan funds transferred in a FY, among the designated States, from a program under this subpart (after accounting for any offsetting transfers into such program) shall not exceed $9 million, or an amount otherwise authorized by law.
( c ) *National Office concurrence.* The State Director may transfer direct loan funds authorized in this section, after requesting and receiving concurrence from the National Office. If permitted by law, the National Office will concur in requests on a first-come-first-served basis.
#### Sidney S. LEVINE, as Executor under the Last Will and Testament of Anna M. Kane, deceased, Libellant-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America and the War Department of The United States Government and the War Shipping Administration of such Government, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 148, Docket 22917.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued March 9, 1954.

Decided March 24, 1954.

Samuel Sweetbaum, New York City (Bernard Lefkowitz, New York City, on the brief), for libelant-appellant.

Benjamin H. Berman, Atty., Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C. (Warren E. Burger, Asst. Atty. Gen., Leavenworth Colby, Sp. Asst, to Atty. Gen., and J. Edward Lumbard, U. S. Atty., New York City, on the brief), for respondents-ap-pellees.

Before CLARK, MEDINA, and HARLAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Order of dismissal on the merits affirmed on the opinion of Judge Dimock, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 115 F.Supp. 58; Gregory v. United States, 2 Cir., 187 F.2d 101; and the statute then applicable, 46 U.S. C.A. §§ 1128d, 1128e.
#### Leonard J. MORMINO, Libelant-Appellant, v. Leon HESS, Inc., Respondent-Appellee.

No. 169, Docket 22935.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued Feb. 3, 1954.

Decided Feb. 15, 1954.

Robert E. Connolley, New York City, for libelant-appellant.

Frederick H. Cunningham, New York City (Victor S. Cichanowicz, Brooklyn, N. Y., on brief), for respondent-appellee.

Before CLARK, FRANK and HINCKS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Decree affirmed on the opinion of District Judge Leibell, 119 F.Supp. 314.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certification
      of Principal Executive Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SRKP 2, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Rappaport,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Richard A. RappaportRichard
                A. Rappaport
              Principal
                Executive Officer
              October
                14, 2008
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Brian J.G. Pereira, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
February 26, 2010

/s/ BRIAN J.G. PEREIRA Brian J.G. Pereira Chief Executive Officer and President
(principal executive officer)


---



QuickLinks
3: Ur1 AiiON 

Cit R/MiONS y of Alpena 

m i ;',\R?3 A ;Q= W 

March 19,2012 

U.S. Senator Carl Levin 

269 Russell Office Building 

Washington. DC 20510-2202 

RE: Alpena Air Service 

Dear Senator Levin, 

As you are aware, the U.S. Department of Transportation will be making a decision very soon 

regarding the current round of bids for EAS funding to provide air service to Alpena, Michigan. 

With the support of the Alpena City Council, the Alpena County Commissioners, the Alpena 

County Regional Airport Manager, the Alpena Area Chamber of Commerce, and the Target 

Alpena Economic Development Director, the Mayor of Alpena requested that the DOT reject the 

current bid proposal and open a fourth cycle, and we are asking you to support our decision. 

This entire process has been very costly and time consuming for the leaders of our community 

and we feel that our local tax payers deserve more time for us to finish what we have started. 

And the federal tax payers deserve to know that EAS funding is being spent as efficiently and 

effectively as possible. 

We have formed a team of representatives from each of the above named entities and secured 

the services of a professional airline consultant. Since then, we have visited SkyWest Airlines 

and they strongly considered bidding in the third round. We have also been in direct contact 

with American Eagle Airlines. We are in active discussions with Public Charters and just two 

days ago learned that their alternative EAS funding proposal was approved to provide service to 

Manistee, Michigan. This program is new, so therefore will take us time to learn and understand 

if it will fit the needs of our community. 

ALKNH 

MICHHSWTSADVHHSHORE 
We understand the DOT'S responsibility to relieve Delta of its obligation to provide air service to 

our community, but we also have a responsibility to our constituents and feel that it is not asking 

too much to give us more time, measured in months, to do what is in the best interest of 

everyone in Northeast Michigan. 

We have made great strides in the last several weeks, but all tangible offers are hinging on one 

decision or another and we're told that it will take some time before any commitments can be 

made by airlines that are considering an agreement with Alpena, 

The Alpena City Council unanimously approved the contents of this letter and strongly urges 

you to echo our voice to the U.S. Department of Transportation. Thank you for your attention to 

this matter and for representing our great community and its growing economy. 

Sincerely, 

Matthew J. Waligora 

Mayor of Alpena 

MiCHlSASfSADVENSHORE
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the following Registration Statements:



|(1) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-65382) pertaining to the Health Management Associates, Inc. Retirement Savings Plan;
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-80433) pertaining to the Health Management Associates, Inc. 1996 Executive Incentive Compensation Plan and the Health
Management Associates, Inc. Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors;
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(3) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-53602) pertaining to the Health Management Associates, Inc. 1996 Executive Incentive Compensation Plan; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(4) | Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-132037) pertaining to the Health Management Associates, Inc. 2006 Outside Director Restricted Stock Award Plan;
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

of our report dated February 25, 2010 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Health
Management Associates, Inc., and our report dated February 25, 2010, with respect to the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Health Management Associates, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year
ended December 31, 2009.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Certified Public Accountants

Miami, Florida

February 25, 2010
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 23-10514

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Russell Filippo, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:19-CR-112-10

______________________________

Before Davis, Ho, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Russell Filippo has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Filippo has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 15, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-10514 Document: 00516968121 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/15/2023
No. 23-10514

2

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate 

review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 23-10514 Document: 00516968121 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/15/2023
```

[109th Congress Public Law 190]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ190.109]

[[Page 120 STAT. 298]]

Public Law 109-190
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
      3038 West Liberty Avenue in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, as the 
         ``Congressman James Grove Fulton Memorial Post Office 
           Building''. <<NOTE: Mar. 20, 2006 -  [H.R. 3256]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3038 
West Liberty in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Congressman James Grove Fulton Memorial Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Congressman James Grove 
Fulton Memorial Post Office Building''.

    Approved March 20, 2006.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3256:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 151 (2005):
                                    Oct. 25, considered and passed 
                                        House.
                                                        Vol. 152 (2006):
                                    Mar. 3, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.14


                      DESCRIPTION OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

     Cash Compensation. Each non-employee director receives an annual retainer
of $20,000 for attendance and participation in regular meetings and committee
meetings of the Board of Directors. In addition, Interwoven reimburses
reasonable travel and related expenses incurred by non-employee directors in
connection with their attendance at meetings of the Board of Directors and its
committees.

     Option Grants. Under the 1999 Equity Incentive Plan, each non-employee
director is automatically granted an option to purchase 10,000 shares of common
stock under this plan when he or she first becomes a member of the Board of
Directors. Subsequently, each non-employee director is automatically granted an
additional option to purchase 10,000 shares of common stock under this plan
following each annual meeting of stockholders, if the director has served
continuously as a member of the Board for at least one year. Each option granted
to directors under the 1999 Equity Incentive Plan has a 10-year term and
terminates three months following the date the director ceases to be one of our
directors or consultants, 12 months afterwards if termination is due to death or
disability. All such options are fully vested and immediately exercisable as of
the date of grant. The option exercise price of all such options is set at the
fair market value of Interwoven common stock on the date of grant.

     Other Benefits. Each non-employee director is eligible to receive health,
dental and vision benefits under Interwoven's benefit plans at the director's
election.
#### § 1726.37 OMB control number.

The collection of information requirements in this part have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget and assigned OMB control number 0572-0107.