alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION

 

I, Lawrence Kong, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of Bidz.com, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)              Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant is made known to us by others,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)             Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)              Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

 

a)              All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b)             Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: August 18, 2005
|   | /s/ Lawrence Kong       |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Lawrence Kong           |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
§ 235.3 Administration. ( a ) Within the Department, FNS shall act on behalf of the Department in the administration of the program for payment to States of State administrative expense funds covered by this part. Within FNS, CND shall be responsible for administration of the program.
( b ) Each State agency desiring to receive payments under this part shall enter into a written agreement with the Department for the administration of the child nutrition programs in accordance with the applicable requirements of this part, 7 CFR parts 210, 215, 220, 225, 226, 245, 15, 15a, 15b, and 2 CFR part 200, subpart D and USDA implementing regulations 2 CFR part 400 and part 415. Each agreement shall cover the operation of the Program during the period specified therein and may be extended at the option of the Department.
(Sec. 14, Pub. L. 95-166, 91 Stat. 1338 (42 U.S.C. 1776); sec. 7, Pub. L. 95-627, 92 Stat. 3621 (42 U.S.C. 1776))
[41 FR 32405, Aug. 3, 1976, as amended at 44 FR 48957, Aug. 21, 1979; Amdt. 14, 51 FR 27151, July 30, 1986; 71 FR 39519, July 13, 2006; 81 FR 66493, Sept. 28, 2016]
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT PROF-2013-S3 LEGAL TITLE ) TRUST, BY U.S. BANK NATIONAL ) ASSOC., AS LEGAL TITLE TRUSTEE, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-3183 ) DENIS PHILLIPS and LORI PHILLIPS, ) ) Appellees. ) ) Opinion filed March 1, 2019. 

### Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; John A. Schaefer, Judge. Jennifer Lima-Smith of Gilbert Garcia Group, P.A., Tampa; Tara M. McDonald (substituted as counsel of record), and Amy M. Kiser, for Appellant. Mark Stopa of Stopa Law Firm, Tampa (withdrew after briefing), Dineen Pashoukos Wasylik of DPW Legal, Tampa, for Appellees.
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.- 2 -

BLACK, LUCAS, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT 10.44

             FORGIVENESS OF PROMISSORY NOTE DATED DECEMBER 31, 2006
                 IN THE AMOUNT OF $20,000 PAYABLE TO HENRY ZAKS




<PAGE>



                                   HENRY ZAKS
                          11649 N. PORT WASHINGTON RD.
                                MEQUON, WI 53092




December 31, 2006




Pedro E. Racelis III (Pete)
China Wireless Communications, Inc.
1746 Cole Boulevard, Suite 225
Golden, Colorado 80401

Subject:  Forgive Loan (Convertible Note #9 Dated November 13, 2006 for
          $20,000.00)

Dear Pete:

As a director of the company, I understand the financial situation of the
company and I hereby forgive the loan totaling $20,000.00, Convertible Note #9,
to China Wireless Communications, Inc. effective immediately.

Sincerely,


/s/ HENRY ZAKS

Henry Zaks
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate recor d, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argumentwould not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. Se e Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered sub mitted without oral argument. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### July 29, 2005 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT
JOSEPH CURIALE, Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. SUITTER, AXLAND & HANSON; JESSE C. TRENTADUE; MICHAEL HOMER, Defendants - Appellees. No. 05-4076 (D.C. No. 2:04-CV-850-TC)

(D. Utah)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before KELLY , O’BRIEN , and TYMKOVICH , Circuit Judges. ** Plaintiff-Appellant Joseph Curiale, a pro se litigant, appeals from the district court’s sua sponte dismissal of his civil rights action. Mr. Curiale brought two claims against Defendants-Appellees, a law firmand two attorneys. The district court dismissed the first claim for lack o f subject matter jurisdiction under- 2 -

Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3) finding that Mr. Curiale’s claim of reputational damage was not a proper § 1983 claim and therefore did notprovide a basis for federal question jurisdiction. The district court dismisse d the second claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) for failure to state a claim. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and review both dismissal decisions d e novo. Curley v. Perry , 246 F.3d 1278, 1281 (10th Cir. 2001); Marcus v. Kan. De pt. of Revenue , 170 F.3d 1305, 1309 (10th Cir. 1999). The parties are sufficiently familiar with the fact s that we need not restate them here. Upon reviewing the record and relevant law, we conclude sua sponte dismissal was appropriate in this case for substant ially the same reasons given by the district court. Harm to reputation alone does not state a proper federal claim, but rather is a matter for state tort law. Paul v. Davis , 424 U.S. 693, 711-712 (1976); Stidham v. Peace Officer Standards & Traini ng , 265 F.3d 1144, 1154 (10th Cir. 2001). Likewise, it is clear from Mr. C uriale’s second claim that “[he] cannot prevail on the facts he has alleged and it w ould be futile to give him an opportunity to amend.” Curley , 246 F.3d at 1281. AFFIRMED. Entered for the Court Paul J. Kelly, Jr. Circuit Judge
**EXHIBIT 31.2****Certification**I, Richard N. Burger, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Coleman Cable, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: November 13, 2007 **/s/ Richard N. Burger** **Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President,**    **Secretary and Treasurer**
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice Drug Enforcement Administration
 By Notice dated March 29, 2010, and published in the 
                    **Federal Register**
                     on April 16, 2010, (75 FR 20001), Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc., Attn: RA, 100 GBC Drive, Mail Stop 514, Newark, Delaware 19702, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed in schedules I and II: Drug
ScheduleTetrahydrocannabinols (7370)
IEcgonine (9180)
IIMorphine (9300)
II
 The company utilizes the listed controlled substances in bulk to manufacture in-vitro diagnostic test kits. The company distributes the test kits for sale to its customers. The process used in manufacturing the test kits irreversibly alters the controlled substances involved in such a manner that they are no longer classified as controlled substances as defined under the Controlled Substances Act. No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and determined that the registration of Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. to manufacture the listed basic classes of controlled substances is consistent with the public interest at this time. DEA has investigated Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc. to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.33, the above named company is granted registration as a bulk manufacturer of the basic classes of controlled substances listed. Dated: November 1, 2010. Joseph T. Rannazzisi, Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.


[FR Doc. 2010-28531 Filed 11-10-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
February 12, 1999

       Securities and Exchange Commission 
       450 Fifth Street, N.W. 
       Washington, D.C. 20549 

            Re:  Vitro Diagnostics, Inc. 
                    Form 10-KSB for the year ending October 31, 1998 
                    SEC file no.  0-17378 

       Dear Sir or Madam:

       Transmitted herewith through the EDGAR system is Form 10-KSB for 
he fiscal year ended October 31, 1997 for Vitro Diagnostics, Inc.  Should 
you have any questions or comments concerning this matter please contact 
the undersigned at the 303-794-2000.



       Sincerely, 


       Roger Hurst 
       President
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCTS LIABILITY 

LITIGATION

This document relates to all cases

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 3:19-md-2885

Judge M. Casey Rodgers

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Christopher R. Bagley of the Law Offices of James Scott 

Farrin hereby notices his appearance as counsel for the Plaintiffs in the cases listed in the table 

below, all of which have been transferred to this District from the Eastern District of North 

Carolina. The undersigned has completed the administrative requirements outlined in Pretrial 

Order No. 3 (Tutorial Confirmation #FLND15551080981958). All further papers and pleadings 

in this action should be served on him.

Plaintiff Case Number

Ryan C. Tate 5:19-CV-44 (E.D.N.C.)

Judson Wager 5:19-CV-47 (E.D.N.C.)

Brent Finnell 5:19-CV-51 (E.D.N.C.)

Anthony Orlandi 5:19-CV-53 (E.D.N.C.)

David Conaway 5:19-CV-56 (E.D.N.C.)

Jeremy Strand 5:19-CV-59 (E.D.N.C.)

Kholifa M. Kabia 5:19-CV-63 (E.D.N.C.)

Jay Edward Garbus 5:19-CV-64 (E.D.N.C.)

Robert J. Wilkinson 7:19-CV-45 (E.D.N.C.)

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 37 Filed 04/15/19 Page 1 of 3
2

Bruce D. Clark 5:19-CV-92 (E.D.N.C.)

June A. Jackson Wyatt 5:19-CV-96 (E.D.N.C.)

Travis Taunton 7:19-cv-50 (E.D.N.C.)

Raymond McCann 5:19-cv-99 (E.D.N.C.)

Theron Kammerer 5:19-CV-100 (E.D.N.C.)

Mark Hollifield 5:19-CV-107 (E.D.N.C.)

Jorge Ocasio 5:19-CV-112 (E.D.N.C.)

Seth Norcross 5:19-CV-113 (E.D.N.C.)

Brandon Leta 5:19-CV-116 (E.D.N.C.)

Respectfully submitted, this the 15th day of April 2019.

LAW OFFICES OF JAMES SCOTT FARRIN

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

By: /s/ Christopher R. Bagley

Gary W. Jackson (NC Bar No. 13976)

Hoyt G. Tessener (NC Bar No. 16068)

Christopher R. Bagley (NC Bar No. 50567)

280 S. Mangum Street, Suite 400

Durham, North Carolina 27701

Telephone: (800) 220-7321

Facsimile: (800) 716-7881

E-mail: cbagley@farrin.com

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 37 Filed 04/15/19 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

In compliance with L.R. 5.1(F), the undersigned certifies that a true and correct copy of 

the foregoing was filed via the Court’s CM/ECF system, which sends notice to all counsel of 

record.

/s/ Christopher R. Bagley

April 15, 2019

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 37 Filed 04/15/19 Page 3 of 3
39–008 

108TH CONGRESS REPORT " HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ! 2d Session 108–736

WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE 

REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 4850, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2005

OCTOBER 6 (legislative day, OCTOBER 5), 2004.—Referred to the House Calendar and 

ordered to be printed 

Mr. LINDER, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 822] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 822, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives all points of order against the conference 

report to accompany H.R. 4850, the District of Columbia Appropriations Act, 2005. Finally, the rule provides that the conference report shall be considered as read.

Æ
§ 248.23 Records and reports. ( a ) *Recordkeeping requirements.* Each State agency shall maintain full and complete records concerning FMNP operations. Such records shall comply with 2 CFR part 200, subpart D and USDA implementing regulations 2 CFR part 400 and part 415 and the following requirements: ( 1 ) Records shall include, but not be limited to, information pertaining to financial operations, FMNP coupon issuance and redemption, equipment purchases and inventory, nutrition education, and civil rights procedures.
( 2 ) All records shall be retained for a minimum of 3 years following the date of submission of the final expenditure report for the period to which the report pertains. If any litigation, claim, negotiation, audit or other action involving the records has been started before the end of the 3-year period, the records shall be kept until all issues are resolved, or until the end of the regular 3-year period, whichever is later. If FNS deems any of the FMNP records to be of historical interest, it may require the State agency to forward such records to FNS whenever the State agency is disposing of them.
( 3 ) Records for nonexpendable property acquired in whole or in part with FMNP funds shall be retained for three years after its final disposition.
( 4 ) All records shall be available during normal business hours for representatives of the Department of the Comptroller General of the United States to inspect, audit, and copy. Any reports resulting from such examinations shall not divulge names of individuals.
( b ) *Financial and recipient reports.* State agencies shall submit financial and FMNP performance data on a yearly basis as specified by FNS and required by section 17(m)(8) of the CNA. Such information shall include, but shall not be limited to: ( 1 ) Number and type of recipients (Federal and non-Federal).
( 2 ) Value of coupons issued.
( 3 ) Value of coupons redeemed.
( c ) *Source documentation.* To be acceptable for audit purposes, all financial and FMNP performance reports shall be traceable to source documentation.
( d ) *Certification of reports.* Financial and FMNP reports shall be certified as to their completeness and accuracy by the person given that responsibility by the State agency.
( e ) *Use of reports.* FNS will use State agency reports to measure progress in achieving objectives set forth in the State Plan, and this part, or other State agency performance plans. If it is determined, through review of State agency reports, FMNP or financial analysis, or an audit, that a State agency is not meeting the objectives set forth in its State Plan, FNS may request additional information including, but not limited to, reasons for failure to achieve these objectives.
[59 FR 11517, Mar. 11, 1994, as amended at 81 FR 66496, Sept. 28, 2016]
## NO. 12

- 18

- 00308

- CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

MARQUEL JERMON SCOTT

, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE §

§

§ APPEAL FROM THE 7TH

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Marquel Jermon Scott filed a notice

of appeal to change the denial of his motion for DNA testing

. The trial court denied Appellant’s

motion on July 25, 2018. Under the rules of appellate procedure, the notice of appeal must be filed

within thirty days after the trial court enters an appealable order. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.2(a)(1).

The record does not indicate that Appellant filed a motion that extended the filing deadline

. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.2(a)(2). Therefore, Appellant’s notice of appeal was due to have been filed no

later than August 24, 2018

. Appellant filed his notice of appeal on Novem ber 5

.
On November 5, this Court notified Appellant that the information received in this appeal

does not show the jurisdiction of this Court, i.e., there was no timely filed notice of appeal or

motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.2, 26.3. We further

notified Appellant that the appeal would be dismissed unless the information was amended on or

before November 15 to show the Court’s jurisdiction. This deadline has passed and Appellant

failed to respond to the November 5 notice.

Because this Court is not authorized to extend the time for perfecting an appeal except as

provided by the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, we dismiss the appeal for want of

jurisdiction

. See Slaton v. State , 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Te x. Crim. App. 1998); see also Olivo v.

State , 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).2

Opinion delivered November 28, 2018.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

( DO NOT PUBLISH )

## COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

NOVEMBER 28 , 2018

NO. 12

- 18

- 00308

- CR

MARQUEL JERMON SCOTT

,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee

Appeal from the 7th District Court

of Smith County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. 007

- 0154

- 13)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the appellate record, and the same being

considered, it is the opinion of this Court that it is without jurisdict ion of the appeal, and that the

appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that this

appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction ; and that this decision be

certified to the court below for observance.

By per curiam opinion

. Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.