alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

IN RE: THE PROGRESSIVE

INSURANCE CORPORATION

UNDERWRITING AND RATING

PRACTICES LITIGATION

CASE NO. 1:03-cv-01519-MP-AK

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court following the issuance of the Eleventh Circuit Court of

Appeals’ mandate. In its mandate, the Eleventh Circuit dismissed for lack of jurisdiction appeals

filed by Angela Fetcher, Julius Dunmore, and GwanJun Kim of this Court’s October 1, 2008,

order (Doc. 506) denying Dunmore and Fetcher’s motion for a second fairness hearing on the

issue of attorneys’ fees and setting forth findings of fact and conclusions of law in support of the

Court’s award to Class Counsel of fees and costs in the amount of $3,000,000. 

The Eleventh Circuit stated in its mandate that this Court anticipated further proceedings

when issuing its October 1, 2008, order. In that order, the Court ordered the parties to submit to

Class Counsel any request for a portion of the fee award and to make a good faith effort to

resolve any disputes concerning the apportionment of the award. Doc. 506 at 19. In accordance

with the Court’s order, Class Counsel then submitted a report (Docs. 513 and 514) representing

that all issues related to the distribution of the fee award had been resolved, save for (1) a request

by Dunmore and Fetcher for $500,000 in attorneys’ fees and costs and (2) a request by Kim for

Case 1:03-cv-01519-MP-AK Document 543 Filed 03/24/09 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No: 1:03-cv-01519-MP-AK

$204,455.00 in attorneys’ fees and costs. Before the Court could resolve those disputes and

finalize the distribution of the fee award among the various plaintiffs’ attorneys, however,

Dunmore and Fetcher filed their appeal, followed shortly by Kim.

Due to the amount of time that has passed since the filing of these appeals, the Court

finds that the best method of proceeding is to order the parties to each file a status report on any

issues the Court has not yet resolved. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The parties shall each submit a report to the Court detailing the nature and status

of all outstanding issues in this case and proposing a method for resolving those

issues. The parties have until Thursday, April 2, 2009, to file their reports.

2. The Court notes that, pursuant to the Court’s October 8, 2008, order (Doc. 510),

the Clerk has rejected an unsolicited filing from Mr. Kim. The Court now grants

Mr. Kim leave to file a report in accordance with this order. 

3. The Motion to Extend Time (Doc. 465) and the Motion for Bond (Doc. 519) are

DENIED as moot.

DONE AND ORDERED this 24th day of March, 2009

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:03-cv-01519-MP-AK Document 543 Filed 03/24/09 Page 2 of 2
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Report: Juveniles Incarcerated in U.S. Adults Jails and Prisons, 2002–2021      

# Report: Juveniles Incarcerated in U.S. Adults Jails and Prisons, 2002–2021

This report details trends for youth ages 17 or younger held in adult correctional facilities from 2002 to 2021. The report includes data on youth in federal prisons, state prisons, and local jails. **Learn more.**
Exhibit 32.1

Section 1350 Certifications

Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 906), Gary D. Newsome and Kelly E. Curry, the President and Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer, respectively, of Health Management Associates, Inc. (the Company), certify that (i) the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the Companys financial condition and results of operations.



/s/ Gary D. NewsomeGary D. NewsomePresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Date: February 25, 2010/s/ Kelly E. CurryKelly E. CurryExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)Date: February 25, 2010


A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### §§ 2003.11-2003.13 [Reserved]
§ 1717.654 Transactions below the 15 percent level. ( a ) A borrower in compliance with all provisions of its RUS mortgage, RUS loan contract, and any other agreements with RUS may, without prior written approval of the Administrator, invest its own funds or make loans or guarantees not in excess of 15 percent of its total utility plant without regard to any provision contained in any RUS mortgage or RUS loan contract to the effect that the borrower must obtain prior approval from RUS, provided, however, that the borrower may not, without the prior written approval of the Administrator, make such investments, loans, and guarantees to extend, add to, or modify its electric system. Moreover, funds necessary to make timely payments of principal and interest on loans secured by the RUS mortgage remain subject to RUS controls on borrower investments, loans and guarantees.
( b ) RUS will not consider requests from borrowers to exclude investments, loans, or guarantees made below the 15 percent level. (Categorical exclusions are set forth in § 1717.655.)
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Farmers & Merchants Bancorp, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
   Date:  February 25, 2009
    /s/ Paul S. SiebenmorgenPaul S. Siebenmorgen, President and CEO
#### In re MEADE.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 8, 1906.)

In the matter of Clarence W. Meade.

No opinion. Motion to tax expenses, etc., granted. Settle order on notice.
Editorial Note on Part 1944
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1944 appear at 80 FR 9885, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1944.531 Applications submission. ( a ) Upon notification that the applicant has been tentatively selected for funding, the State Office will forward to the applicant a signed Form AD-622 and provide SF 424.1 with instructions to the applicant for preparation of an application.
( b ) Upon receipt of Form AD-622, the applicant will submit an application in an original and 2 copies on Form SF 424.1, and provide whatever additional information is requested to the District Office within 30 days.
( c ) Upon receipt of an application on SF 424.1 by the District Office, a docket shall be assembled which will include the following: ( 1 ) Form SF 424.1 and the information submitted in accordance with § 1944.526(a)(2).
( 2 ) Form AD-622.
( 3 ) Any comments received in accordance with 2 CFR part 200 as adopted by USDA through 2 CFR part 400. See RD Instruction 1970-I, available in any Rural Development Office.
( 4 ) SF 424.1.
( 5 ) OGC legal determination made pursuant to § 1944.526(c)(3).
( 6 ) Grant Agreement.
( 7 ) Form RD 1940-1, “Request for Obligation of Funds.”
( 8 ) Form RD 400-1, “Equal Opportunity Agreement.”
( 9 ) Form RD 400-4, “Assurance Agreement.”
( 10 ) Environmental review documentation and historical and archaeological review in accordance with 7 CFR part 1970.
( 11 ) The detailed budget for the agreement period based upon the needs outlined in the proposal and the comments and recommendations by Rural Development.
[47 FR 40400, Sept. 14, 1982, as amended at 48 FR 29121, June 24, 1983; 49 FR 3763, Jan. 30, 1984; 55 FR 13503, 13504, Apr. 11, 1990; 76 FR 80731, Dec. 27, 2011; 79 FR 76011, Dec. 19, 2014; 81 FR 11031, Mar. 2, 2016]
Amendment to the
                Amended and Restated By-Laws as of June 28, 1990
                                     by the
                              Board of Directors of

                               NL Industries, Inc.




     Effective December 8, 2003, the board of directors of NL Industries,  Inc.,
a New Jersey corporation (the "Corporation"), adopted the following amendment to
the amended and restated by-laws of Corporation as of June 28, 1990.

     Section 3.1 of the  Corporation's  by-laws (as amended as of June 28, 1990)
is amended to read in its entirety as follows:

     3.1 - Number,  Election and Terms. Except as otherwise fixed by or pursuant
to the provisions of Article IV of the Certificate relating to the rights of the
holders  of  Preferred  Stock  or  any  other  class  of  capital  stock  of the
Corporation  (other  than  Common  Stock) or any series of any of the  foregoing
which is then outstanding,  the number of the directors of the Corporation shall
be not less  than one nor more  than 17  persons.  Additional  directors  may be
elected  by the  holders  of  shares  of a  series  of  Preferred  Stock  in the
circumstances  set forth in Article IV of the  Certificate  or any resolution or
resolutions  providing for the issuance of such series of shares  adopted by the
Board of Directors. The exact number of directors within the minimum and maximum
limitations  specified in this section and the  Certificate  shall be fixed from
time to time,  (i) except as provided in (ii) below,  by the Board of  Directors
pursuant to a resolution  adopted by a majority of the entire Board of Directors
or (ii) by the  shareholders  pursuant to a resolution  adopted by a majority of
the  shareholders  of the  Corporation  entitled  to vote  for the  election  of
directors.

Executed:  December 8, 2003.

                                                          NL Industries, Inc.




By:  /s/ Robert D. Graham
Robert D. Graham, Secretary
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCTS

Case No. 3:19md2885

LIABILITY LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

Baker, 7:20cv39

Judge M. Casey Rodgers

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones

DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS ORDER NO. 7

This Order addresses Defendants’ objections and counter-designations to 

Plaintiff’s affirmative deposition designations and Plaintiff’s objections to 

Defendants’ counter-designations thereto for the following witness depositions:

1. Klun, Robert 6-24-2020

2. Ohama, Dan 11-17-2020

SO ORDERED, on this 7th day of June, 2021.

M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 7:20-cv-00039-MCR-GRJ Document 155 Filed 06/07/21 Page 1 of 1
#### The State ex rel. Bell, Appellant, *v.*University of Cincinnati Hospital et al., Appellees.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Bell v. Univ. of Cincinnati Hosp.*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 336.]

(No. 97-1693

Submitted August 19, 1998

Decided October 14, 1998.)

*Butkovich, Schimpf Schimpf& Ginocchio Co., L.P.A., James A. Whittaker*and *Stephen P. Gast,*for appellant.

*337*Taft, Stettinius & Hollister*and *Joseph A. Rectenwald,*for appellee University of Cincinnati Hospital.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Cheryl J. Nester,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellees Industrial Commission and Administrator, Bureau of Workers’ Compensation.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
#### § 201.7 Purity (including variety).

The complete record for any lot of seed shall include (a) records of tests, including statements of weed seeds, noxious weed seeds, inert matter, other agricultural seeds, and of any determinations of kind, variety, or type and a description of the methods used; and (b) for seeds indistinguishable by seed characteristics, records necessary to disclose the kind, variety, or type, including a grower's declaration of kind, variety, or type or an invoice, or other document establishing the kind, variety, or type to be that stated, and a representative sample of the seed. The grower's declaration shall be obtained and kept by the person procuring the seed from the grower. A copy of the grower's declaration and a sample of the seed shall be retained by the grower.

[5 FR 30, Jan. 4, 1940, as amended at 20 FR 7929, Oct. 21, 1955; 24 FR 3951, May 15, 1959; 85 FR 40579, July 7, 2020]
#### § 1c.118 Applications and proposals lacking definite plans for involvement of human subjects.

Certain types of applications for grants, cooperative agreements, or contracts are submitted to Federal departments or agencies with the knowledge that subjects may be involved within the period of support, but definite plans would not normally be set forth in the application or proposal. These include activities such as institutional type grants when selection of specific projects is the institution's responsibility; research training grants in which the activities involving subjects remain to be selected; and projects in which human subjects' involvement will depend upon completion of instruments, prior animal studies, or purification of compounds. Except for research waived under § 1c.101(i) or exempted under § 1c.104, no human subjects may be involved in any project supported by these awards until the project has been reviewed and approved by the IRB, as provided in this policy, and certification submitted, by the institution, to the Federal department or agency component supporting the research.
Joint Committee on Taxation 

 July 24, 2000 

 JCX-78-00R 

DESCRIPTION OF CHAIRMAN ARCHER=S AMENDMENT 

IN THE NATURE OF A SUBSTITUTE TO H.R. 4844, THE 

“RAILROAD RETIREMENT AND SURVIVORS’ IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 2000”

Chairman Archer=s amendment in the nature of a substitute to the “Railroad Retirement 

and Survivors’ Improvement Act of 2000”1

 would include the provisions of the bill, with various 

technical and clerical changes, and the following modifications: 

A. Establish Legal Domicile of the Railroad Retirement Investment Trust 

The provision providing for the establishment of the Railroad Retirement Investment 

Trust (“Trust”) is modified by clarifying that the legal domicile of the Trust is the District of 

Columbia. 

B. Enforcement of Fiduciary Standards 

The provision providing for fiduciary standards for each member of the board of trustees 

of the Railroad Retirement Trust is modified to provide for enforcement of these standards by the 

Railroad Retirement Board. 

C. Transition Rule for Transfer or Conversion of Existing Obligations 

 The provision providing for the transfer of assets from the railroad retirement account 

and the Social Security equivalent benefit account to the Railroad Retirement Trust Fund is 

modified to provide for the board of trustees for the Trust to consult with the Secretary of the 

Treasury to develop an appropriate method for transferring or converting existing obligations 

held by the accounts. 

D. Repeal the 4.3-Cents-Per-Gallon General Fund Excise Taxes on 

Train Diesel Fuel and Inland Waterway Barge Fuels

 Under present law, diesel fuel used in trains is subject to a 4.4-cents-per-gallon excise 

tax. Revenues from 4.3 cents per gallon of this excise tax are retained in the General Fund of the 

Treasury. The remaining 0.1 cent per gallon is deposited in the Leaking Underground Storage 

Tax (“LUST”) Trust Fund. 

 1

 The bill is described in the document entitled: Joint Committee on Taxation, 

Description of the “Railroad Retirement and Survivors’ Improvement Act of 2000 (H.R. 

4844)”(JCX-74-00R), July 24, 2000. 
 Similarly, fuel used in barges operating on the designated inland waterways system is 

subject to a 4.3-cents-per-gallon General Fund excise tax. This tax is in addition to the 20.1-

cents-per-gallon tax rates that are imposed on fuel used in these barges to fund the Inland 

Waterways Trust Fund and the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Trust Fund. 

 In both cases, the 4.3-cents-per-gallon excise tax rates are permanent. The LUST tax is 

scheduled to expire after March 31, 2005. 

 The amendment in the nature of a substitute would repeal the 4.3-cents-per-gallon 

General Fund excise taxes on diesel fuel used in trains and fuel used in barges operating on the 

designated inland waterways system. 

Effective date.--The provision would be effective on October 1, 2000.
### Changes to MT Regional Haze Public Hearing Dates
Monica Morales Monica Morales to: Don_Shepherd, Sorkin, Jeff,

Patricia_F_Brewer, Sandra_V_Silva, Tim_Allen, baanderson02, Dzomba, Thomas 03/23/2012 09:11 AM
Cc: Vanessa Hinkle, Sara Laumann, Steve Odendahl, Elyana Sutin
From: Monica Morales/R8/USEPA/US To: Don_Shepherd@nps.gov, "Sorkin, Jeff" < jasorkin @fs.fed.us>, Patricia_F_Brewer@nps.gov,

Sandra_V_Silva@fws.gov, Tim_Allen@fws.gov, baanderson02@fs.fed.us, "Dzomba, Thomas C -FS" <tdzomba@fs.fed.us>, Carol_McCoy@nps.gov Cc: Vanessa Hinkle/R8/USEPA/US@EPA, Sara Laumann/R8/USEPA/US@EPA, Steve

Odendahl/R8/USEPA/US@EPA, Elyana Sutin/R8/USEPA/US@EPA Monica Morales Changes to MT Regional Haze Public Hearing Dates

Hi, I wanted you all to know, as soon as possible, that we had to change the dates for the public hearings in Montana for the Regional Haze proposed action. We realized that we have to ensure that following a public hearing that the comment period remains open for at least 30 additional days. Due to the deadline for signing our final action, we could not allow more than 60 days for public comment, so we have moved the hearing dates to May 1st in Helena and May 2nd in Billings. We will be in the same locations. However, the large room at the library in Helena is not available until 1:30 pm, so the public hearing will be held from 2-5:30 pm and 6:30-9:00 pm. The hours for the Billings hearing are the same as before. Sorry for the change. These changes will be reflected in the notice that is published in the Federal Register .

Monica S. Morales, Unit Chief Air Quality Planning Unit Air Program (8P-AR) U.S. EPA Region 8 1595 Wynkoop Street Denver, CO 80202-1129 phone (303) 312-6936 fax (303) 312-6064
###### Editorial Note on Part 1944

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1944 appear at 80 FR 9885, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1944.408 [Reserved]
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

APHREY BENJAMIN COLLIS,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO. 3:19cv4923-MCR-EMT

MICHAEL A. FLOWERS, et al.,

Defendants.

______________________________/

O R D E R

The chief magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on July 15, 

2020. ECF No. 15. Plaintiff was furnished a copy of the Report and 

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, 

United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of all 

timely filed objections.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, and any timely filed 

objections thereto, I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be 

adopted.

Case 3:19-cv-04923-MCR-EMT Document 17 Filed 09/03/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:19cv4923-MCR-EMT

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 

15, is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order.

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to 

comply with an order of the court.

DONE AND ORDERED this 3rd day of September 2020.

 s/ M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:19-cv-04923-MCR-EMT Document 17 Filed 09/03/20 Page 2 of 2
#### §§ 205.243-205.269 [Reserved]
To: Jim Eddinger/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> Date: 06/08/2012 05:02PM Cc: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Thomas Gillis/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Subject: EO 13563 Interagency Comments on Area Source Boilers Rule (See attached file: AreaSourceBoilers_InteragencyCommentsunderEO13563_2012_06_07.doc)
Hi Jim, Attached are interagency comments under EO 3563 on the area source boilers rule. I will send a redline of the preamble on Monday

. Please let me know if yo u have an y questions. Thanks, Cortney AreaSourceBoilers_InteragencyCommentsunderEO13563_2012_06_07.doc