alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Automotive Manufacturers’

Incentive Program

to Vehicle Salespersons

Did you know. . .

that incentive payments paid by

an automotive manufacturer

are taxable income, whether

made directly to individual sales

persons or through a dealer?

Reporting Incentive Payments

Follow the filing guidelines below when reporting

incentive payments you received from a manufacturer.

If someone other than yourself prepares your tax

return, make sure the preparer is aware of these guidelines:

• Report the income on page 1 of Form 1040, U.S.

Individual Income Tax Return under Income on the

line titled “Other Income”.

• Check to see if the expenses you incur to get the

incentive payments are deductible on Schedule A,

Itemized Deductions (Form 1040) under Job

Expenses and Most Other Miscellaneous

Deductions on the line titled “Other Expenses”.

These expenses are subject to the 2% adjusted gross

income limitation.

• Do not report the income on Schedule C (Form

1040), Profit and Loss from Business, because

recipients of these payments are not engaged in an

individual trade or business and are therefore not

self­employed. Similarly, no expenses may be

taken on Schedule C to offset incentive payment

income.

Good News about the Payments

Payments reported on Form 1099­MISC, Miscellaneous

Income, (1) are not treated as wages, (2) are not subject to federal income tax withholding, social security,

medicare, or federal unemployment tax, and (3) are

not considered to be self­employment income and,

therefore, are not subject to self­employment tax.
Additional Information is Available

For information on taxable income, including

bonuses and awards, see Publication 525, Taxable

and Nontaxable Income. To order free IRS tax publications and forms, call the IRS at 1­800­829­3676

(1­800­TAX­FORM). You may also download and

print publications, forms, and other tax information

materials.

Often you will be able to find answers to your tax

questions by reading tax publications and related

forms. When you need more information, you may

call the IRS at 1­800­829­1040.

Department of the Treasury Publication 3204 (Rev. 2­2008)

Internal Revenue Service Catalog Number 26742N

www.irs.gov
#### Marie M. Reilly, Individually and as Executrix of Thomas A. Reilly, Deceased, et al., Appellants, v. Anna Loventhal et al., Defendants, and City of New York, Respondent.

Order, entered on June 26, 1968, unanimously modified, on the law, without costs, to the extent of deleting that part thereof which struck Item 1 from the plaintiffs’ notice of discovery and inspection and otherwise affirmed. Unlike Items 2 and 5 of the challenged notice, Item 1 does not seek records which are confidential by virtue of sections 1113 and 1114 of the New York City Charter. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Capozzoli, McGivern, McNally and Steuer, JJ.
Exhibit
10.57




FIRST
AMENDMENT


TO


NORTHERN
ILLINOIS GAS COMPANY


DIRECTORS’ DEFERRED
COMPENSATION PLAN





WHEREAS,
Northern Illinois Gas Company (the “Company”) previously established the
Northern Illinois Gas Company Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended
and restated effective as of January 1, 2008 (the “Plan”); and


WHEREAS,
the Company desires to amend the Plan in certain respects effective as of
January 1, 2008.


NOW
THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:





I.  Section
2 of the Plan is deleted in its entirety and the following new Section 2 is
substituted in lieu thereof:


“SECTION
2.  Participation.  A
Director of the Company may elect to defer the payment or portion thereof owed
for the:




(i)           
retainers; or




(ii)           meeting
fees; or




(iii)          any
combination of (i)-(ii) above.




Such
election must be communicated to the Company in writing prior to December 31 of
the year prior to the term for which the Director may be
reelected.  For a Director first elected or appointed to the Board,
such election shall be communicated to the Company in writing within thirty (30)
days of the date the Director is first elected or appointed to the Board;
provided such deferment shall apply only to the compensation earned after such
written election is communicated to the Company.  Once made an
election shall continue in force with respect to succeeding terms of the
Director’s service unless the Director shall advise the Company in writing prior
to December 31 of the year prior to the year of reelection that he or she elects
to terminate or change the terms of such deferment effective with such
reelection.  In addition, such election shall specify the manner and
date on which the Director elects to receive payment of the deferred amount
under Subsection 3.1 below.  Directors who were Directors on









January
1, 2008, shall file an election as to the time and form of payment of all their
deferrals, whether made prior to or after such date by December 31, 2008;
provided, no such election may accelerate payment of any deferrals into
2008.  Notwithstanding any deferral election in existence to the
contrary, no meeting fees paid after the Director’s Separation from Service
(whether or not earned prior to such Separation from Service) may be deferred
under this Plan.”









2
Exhibit 7



Computation of Ratios for Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2015, 2016 and 2017



|                                |  |  |  |          |  |  |          |  |  |          |  | 
|------------------------------- |  |  |  | -------- |  |  | -------- |  |  | -------- |  | 
|                                |  |  |  | 2015     |  |  | 2016     |  |  | 2017     |  | 
|                                |  |  |  | CNY000  |  |  | CNY000  |  |  | CNY000  |  | 
|Current assets (a)              |  |  |  | 57,580   |  |  | 36,242   |  |  | 29,411   |  | 
|Current liabilities (b)         |  |  |  | 123,889  |  |  | 76,296   |  |  | 45,253   |  | 
|Current ratio (c=a/b)           |  |  |  | 0.46     |  |  | 0.48     |  |  | 0.65     |  | 
|Working capital (d=a-b)         |  |  |  | (66,309) |  |  | (40,054) |  |  | (15,842) |  | 
|Total interest-bearing debt (i) |  |  |  |         |  |  |         |  |  |         |  | 
|Total shareholders equity (j)  |  |  |  | (17,799) |  |  | 13,195   |  |  | (15,505) |  | 
|Total capital (k=i+j)           |  |  |  | (17,799) |  |  | 13,195   |  |  | (15,505) |  |
96-1466.

#### Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Droe.

This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing on July 17,1998, by the Clients’ Security Fund of a motion for order to show cause why respondent should not be found in contempt for failure to comply with this court’s order of November 13,1996. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by this court, *sua sponte,*that William G. Droe, Attorney Registration No. 0040993, last known address in Cleveland, Ohio, is found in contempt for failure to comply with this court’s order of November 13,1996. It is further ordered that this cause be referred to the Office of the Attorney General for collection.
Fourth Department,

December, 1979

(December 7, 1979)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Merrill Confer, Appellant.

unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The limited use permitted defense counsel of the police report in this case when he sought to examine prior written statements of the prosecution witnesses for purposes of cross-examination was an error under *People v Rosario*(9 NY2d 286). We find, however, that there is no reasonable possibility that this error might have contributed to the conviction and that it was, therefore, harmless beyond a reasonable doubt *(Chapman v California,*386 US 18; *People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230, 237). (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga County Court—burglary, third degree, etc.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Schnepp, Callahan, Witmer and Moule, JJ.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FE BRUARY 27, 2020

NO. 03

- 18

- 00676

- CR

James Manson, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 427TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, J USTIC ES BAKER AND TRIANA

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction r en d ered by the trial court. Having reviewed

the rec ord a nd the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment of conviction

. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of

conviction

. Because appellant is indigent and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs is

made.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Otis Austin, Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 2, 1967, dismissed. An order denying a motion for resentence is not appealable *(People*v. *Brown,*26 A D 2d 779). However, we have considered the merits of defendant’s contentions, and, if we were not dismissing the appeal, we would affirm the order. Beldoek, P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
Editorial Note on Part 1944
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1944 appear at 80 FR 9885, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1944.658 Applicant eligibility. ( a ) To be eligible to receive a grant, the applicant must: ( 1 ) Be an organization as defined in § 1944.656 of this subpart;
( 2 ) Have the necessary background and experience on the part of its staff or governing body with proven ability to perform responsibility in the field of low-income rural housing development, repair and rehabilitation, or have other business management or administrative experience which indicates an ability to operate a program providing repair and rehabilitation financial assistance as well as for replacement housing;
( 3 ) Legally obligate itself to administer HPG funds, provide an adequate accounting of the expenditure of such funds in compliance with the terms of this regulation, the grant agreement, and 2 CFR part 200 as adopted by USDA through 2 CFR part 400 (available in any Rural Development office), as appropriate, and comply with the grant agreement and Rural Development regulations; and
( 4 ) If the applicant is engaged in or plans to become engaged in any other activities, provide sufficient evidence and documentation that they have adequate resources, including financial resources, to carry on any other programs or activities to which they are committed without jeopardizing the success and effectiveness of the HPG project.
( b ) An applicant will *not* be considered eligible if it is a nonprofit entity *and* its proposal is based *solely* on an identity of interest, as defined in § 1924.4(i) of subpart A of part 1924 of this chapter, between the applicant and the owner(s) of the proposed dwelling or co-op to be rehabilitated or repaired.
[58 FR 21894, Apr. 26, 1993, as amended at 62 FR 26209, May 13, 1997; 79 FR 76011, Dec. 19, 2014]
July 26, 2012
Ms. Diana Esher Director Air Protection DivisionGOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA District Department ofthe Environment 

# ***

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III Mail Code 3APOO 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029 RE: District ofColumbia- Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerator (HMIWI) Units Negative Declaration inPlace ofa State Plan DearMs. Esher: The District Department ofthe Environment (DDOE) has reviewed the sources inthe District of Columbia and has concluded that there are no "designated facilities", as defined in 40 CFR 60, Subpart Ce, Section 60.32e inthe District ofColumbia. The single known facility ofthis type, a pathological waste incinerator located at Georgetown University, which has been inactive since 2003, has been rendered inoperable with welded charge doors and disconnected fuel lines. The facility has indicated that it will not use the unit in the future. Therefore, the unit is not considered a "designated facility". Therefore, with this letter, the District ofColumbia is hereby submitting a negative declaration in lieu ofa state plan, pursuant to 40 CFR 62.06 for HMIWI units. Ifyouhave any questions or need additional information, please contact Mr. Stephen Ours at (202) 535-1747. Sincerely,

# ~Cfrc~£_1( Cecily M Beall Associate Director Air Quality Division

greenforward 

# 01652

DISTRICT DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 1200 First St. NE, 5th Floor, Washington, DC 200021 tel: 202.535.2600 Iweb:ddoe.dc.gov
#### § 1739.18 Grant documents.

The terms and conditions of grants shall be set forth in grant documents prepared by the Agency. The documents shall require the applicant to own all equipment and facilities financed by the grant. Among other matters, the Agency may prescribe conditions to the advance of funds that address concerns regarding the Project feasibility and sustainability. The Agency may also prescribe terms and conditions applicable to the construction and operation of the Project and the delivery of service at the Broadband Grant Speed to eligible Rural Areas, as well as other terms and conditions applicable to the individual Project. Dividend distributions will not be allowed until all grant funds and matching contributions have been expended.
§ 180.3 Cattle Contracts Library. ( a ) *Initial contract information submission.* On January 6, 2023, each packer shall submit to the Secretary information for each active contract with a unique identifier. The information shall be submitted in accordance with § 180.1(e). The contract information required to be reported includes: ( 1 ) The contract method;
( 2 ) The contract start and end dates; and
( 3 ) All terms associated with: ( i ) Each base price source and adjustment;
( ii ) Selling basis;
( iii ) Premiums and discounts;
( iv ) Specifications relating to cattle attributes;
( v ) Delivery and transportation terms and payments;
( vi ) Financing, risk-sharing, profit-sharing or other financial arrangements; and,
( vii ) Volume provisions.
( b ) *Reporting deadlines.* Within 1 business day of making a new contract available, making a change to an existing contract, or making a contract no longer available, each packer must submit the following: ( 1 ) Packers must submit all contract terms in accordance § 108.4(a) for each new active contract for each producer or producers at each plant that it operates or at which it has cattle slaughtered;
( 2 ) Packers must submit any changes to the terms of a previously submitted active contract and associated schedules or appendices, including the unique identifier for the previously submitted contract it supersedes; and
( 3 ) Packers must submit information to remove inactive contracts from the library, including the unique identifier for the now inactive contract.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-03-1999
<CASH>                                         207,942
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  104,355
<ALLOWANCES>                                       991
<INVENTORY>                                    124,884
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               453,739
<PP&E>                                         178,860
<DEPRECIATION>                                  50,496
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 604,641
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           67,961
<BONDS>                                        207,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        62,576
<OTHER-SE>                                     258,593
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   604,641
<SALES>                                        637,064
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               637,064
<CGS>                                          536,519
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  536,519
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (216)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,495
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    294
<INCOME-TAX>                                       112
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                182
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       182
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01


</TABLE>
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 3(e)

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                     OF THE CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF

                               ANDOVER TOGS, INC.

                                 --------------

        It is hereby certified that:

        (a) The name of the corporation is ANDOVER TOGS, INC.

        (b) The certificate of incorporation of the corporation was filed with
the Department of State on April 22, 1986.

        (c) The amendment to the certificate of incorporation of the corporation
effected by this certificate of amendment is to change the name of the
corporation to "The Andover Apparel Group, Inc."

        (d) To accomplish the foregoing amendment, Article FIRST of the
certificate of incorporation of the corporation is hereby amended to read as
follows:

        FIRST: The name of the corporation (hereinafter called the "Corporation"
        is THE ANDOVER APPAREL GROUP, INC.

        (e) The foregoing amendment of the certificate of incorporation of the
corporation was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of
the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have subscribed this document on the date set
forth below and do hereby affirm, under the penalties of perjury, that this
document is the act and deed of the corporation named therein and that the facts
stated herein are true.

Dated: June 3, 1998                       /s/ Donald D. Shack     
                                      ----------------------------
                                       Donald D. Shack, Secretary




<PAGE>
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Notes: 1. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 83 FR 22178, May 14, 2018. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 83 FR 61310, Nov. 29, 2018 3. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 85 FR 65504, Oct. 15, 2020. 4. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 87 FR 44266, July 26, 2022.

§ 2.3 Authority of the Secretary to delegate authority. ( a ) The general authority of the Secretary to make delegations of his authority is based on: ( 1 ) Section 4(a) of Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 1953 (5 U.S.C. App.), which provides that the Secretary of Agriculture may from time to time make such provisions as he shall deem appropriate authorizing the performance by any other officer, or by an agency or employee, of the Department of Agriculture of any function of the Secretary, including any function transferred to the Secretary by the provisions of this reorganization plan; and
( 2 ) Section 212(a)(1) of the Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994, Pub. L. No. 103-354, 7 U.S.C. 6912(a)(1), which provides that the Secretary may delegate to any agency, office, officer, or employee of the Department the authority to perform any function transferred to the Secretary under 7 U.S.C. 6912(a) or any other function vested in the Secretary as of the date of the enactment of the Act.
( b ) [Reserved]
#### In the Matter of Justin Winston, Petitioner. Bar Association of Nassau County, New York, Inc., Respondent.

Application by a suspended attorney, whose period of suspension has expired, for reinstatement as an attorney and counselor at law. The application was referred to the Committee on Character and Fitness for the Tenth Judicial District for investigation, *563hearing, report and recommendations. The committee’s report has been received by the court. Application granted; petitioner’s name directed to be restored to the roll of attorneys and counselors at law, effective forthwith. Beldoek, P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
#### § 1752.5 Monetary default by Borrower.

A defaulting Borrower's primary responsibility is to expeditiously bring the delinquent account current. If a monetary default exceeds 60 days, RUS will attempt to discuss the situation with the Borrower and make the Borrower aware of options that may be available. In considering options, the prospects for providing a permanent cure without adversely affecting the risk to the Agency is the paramount objective. RUS will also work with entities that are not in monetary default but whose financial position is such that, without RUS action, a monetary default is imminent within the next 24 months, as evidenced by a financial forecast provided by the Borrower. RUS receives quarterly financial reports and annual audits from borrowers and actively monitors the borrower's Times Interest Earned Ratio (TIER), Current Ration, Debt Service Coverage Ratio, and Net Worth.
#### § 160.85 Sale of mixed turpentine not lawful.

Since no standard has been provided for a mixture of two or more kinds of spirits of turpentine, the sale in commerce of any such mixture is prohibited under any designation.
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, for thepurposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in hiscapacity as an officer of Bidz.com, Inc. (“Bidz.com”), that, to his knowledge,the Quarterly Report of Bidz.com on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperation of Bidz.com.

 
| Date:  | November 10, 2005 | By     | /s/  David Zinberg       |   |
|--------|-------------------|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   |              |   | David  Zinberg           |   |
|   |              |   | Chief  Executive Officer |   |
|   |              |   |                     |   |
| Date:  | November 10, 2005 | By     | /s/  Lawrence Kong       |   |
|   |              |   | Lawrence  Kong           |   |
|   |              |   | Chief  Financial Officer |   |

 

----
#### §§ 1970.105-1970.150 [Reserved]
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

10 

KA 10-02296 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, LINDLEY, AND GORSKI, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BILLIE JO WEBSTER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

(APPEAL NO. 2.)

 

JAMES L. DOWSEY, III, ELLICOTTVILLE (KELIANN M. ELNISKI OF COUNSEL),

FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

LORI PETTIT RIEMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LITTLE VALLEY (KELLY M. BALCOM

OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Cattaraugus County Court (Larry M.

Himelein, J.), rendered September 13, 2010. The judgment revoked

defendant’s sentence of probation and imposed a sentence of

imprisonment. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Same Memorandum as in People v Webster ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d

___ [Jan. 31, 2012]). 

Entered: January 31, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 23

- 00169

- CR

Adrian Lee Hernandez v. The State of Texas

On Appeal from the 214th District Court of Nueces County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 21FC

- 1934F

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed as modified by
this Court . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
June 1 3, 2024