alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAutonomous integrated GPS/INS navigation experiment for OMV. Phase 1: Feasibility studyThe phase 1 research focused on the experiment definition. A tightly integrated Global Positioning System/Inertial Navigation System (GPS/INS) navigation filter design was analyzed and was shown, via detailed computer simulation, to provide precise position, velocity, and attitude (alignment) data to support navigation and attitude control requirements of future NASA missions. The application of the integrated filter was also shown to provide the opportunity to calibrate inertial instrument errors which is particularly useful in reducing INS error growth during times of GPS outages. While the Orbital Maneuvering Vehicle (OMV) provides a good target platform for demonstration and for possible flight implementation to provide improved capability, a successful proof-of-concept ground demonstration can be obtained using any simulated mission scenario data, such as Space Transfer Vehicle, Shuttle-C, Space Station.Document ID19900011653Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsUpadhyay, Triveni N.*(Mayflower Communications Co., Inc. Reading, MA, United States)*Priovolos, George J.*(Mayflower Communications Co., Inc. Reading, MA, United States)*Rhodehamel, Harley*(Mayflower Communications Co., Inc. Reading, MA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1990Publication InformationPublisher: NASASubject CategoryAircraft Communications And NavigationReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:4267NASA-CR-4267Accession Number90N20969Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS8-38031Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900011653.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23
- 10514 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,** versus **Russell Filippo,** Defendant

— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:19
- CR
- 112 - 10

**____________________ __________**  Before **Davis, Ho,** and **Wilson,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** The attorney appointed to represent Russell Filippo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Filippo has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the r elevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir .**  **R .**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 15, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-10514 Document: 00516968121 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/15/2023No. 23
- 10514

2 assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further res ponsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED** . See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2 . Case: 23-10514 Document: 00516968121 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/15/2023
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the quarterly report of Data Call Technologies, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2009 (the“Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, I, Larry Mosley, CFO and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Larry Mosley

Larry MosleyCFO and DirectorDated: May 15, 2009

A signed original of this writtenstatement required by Section 906 has been provided to Data Call Technologies, Inc. andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission orits staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 31.2****Certification**I, Richard N. Burger, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Coleman Cable, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c. disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.       Date:August 9, 2006   **/s/ Richard N. Burger**             **Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President,**      **Secretary and Treasurer**
# Water Quality Standards Regulatory

Clarifications Proposed Rule:

Webinar Access Instructions

Thank	you	for	registering	for	th e	first	webinar	on	EPA’s	Water Quality	Standards Regulatory	Clarifications	Propos ed	Rule.	The	webinar	is	schedul e	for September 24, 1:00

‐ 3:00 pm (Eastern) .	Below,	please	find	information on	how	to	access	the	webinar, as	well as	several	important	notes.

HOW TO ACCESS THE WEBINAR There	are	two	ways	to	access	the	webinar.	If	your	computer	syst em	has	speakers,	please
use	Option	1:
Option 1—If your computer system has speakers:

1. Access	the	audio	and	video	portions	of	the	presentations	at: https://epa.connectsolutions.com/wqsruleweb1/

a. Log	in	as	“Guest.”	Enter	yo ur	first	and	last	name.

b. You	will	see	the	screen	for	the	p resentation.	On	the	right	side of	the	screen, you	will	see	a	list	of	participants	and	a	“chat”	window.

2. You	do	not	need	to	dial‐in	using your	phone.	Once	EPA	begins	th e	webinar,	you	will be	able	to	hear	the	presentation	through	your	computer’s	speake rs.

a. The	webinar	will	begin	at	1:00	pm (Eastern).	If	you	log‐in	to	t he	system before	that	time,	you	will	hear	silence.

3. During	the	Q&A,	you	can	type	you r	clarifying	questions	in	the	“ chat”	window.	EPA will	respond	to	as	many	questions	as	time	allows,	but	may	not	b e	able	to	respond	to every	question	submitted	during	the	webinar.

Option 2—If your computer does not have speakers:

1. To	access	the	presentation,	go	to: https://epa.connectsolutions.com/wqsruleweb1/

a. Log	in	as	“Guest.”	Enter	yo ur	first	and	last	name.

b. You	will	see	the	screen	for	the	p resentation.	On	the	right	side of	the	screen, you	will	see	a	list	of	participants	and	a	“chat”	window.

2. To	access	the	audio	portion,	dial	in	to	the	conference	line	thr ough	your	phone:

a. Conference	Number:		1‐866‐299‐3188
b. Participant	Co de:	2025661149

c. The	webinar	will	begin	at	1:00	pm (Eastern).	If	you	log	in	to	t he	system before	that	time,	you	will	hear	silence.

3. During	the	Q&A,	you	can	type	you r	clarifying	questions	in	the	“ chat”	window.	EPA will	respond	to	as	many	questions	as	time	allows,	but	may	not	b e	able	to	respond	to every	question	submitted	during	the	webinar.OTHER NOTES:

 Please do not share the url or phone number so that EPA can be sure that
individuals who have pre
‐ registered are able to access the webinar.

 Test	your	system	prior	to	the	dat e	of	the	webinar	to	ensure	tha t	you	are	able	to connect.	To	test	your	system,	go	to: https://epa.connectsolutions.co m/common/help/en/support/meeting _test.htm

 The	webinar	will	begin	at	1:00	pm (Eastern).	If	you	log	in	to	t he	system	before	that time,	you	will	hear	silence.

 Please	use	your	computer	speakers	to	hear	the	presentation,	if possible	(option	1 above).

o If	you	use	both	computer	speaker s	and	dial	in	to	the	phone	call ‐in	number, you	will	hear	feedback.

 The	webinar	is	limited	to	500 individual	connections.

o If	several	people	from	your	orga nization	will	be	participating in	the	webinar, please	consider	joining	the	webi nar	from	a	central	location.
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 03-1344

___________ Kenneth Kenley, * * Petitioner/Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Donald Roper, Superintendent Potosi * [PUBLISHED] Correctional Center, * * Respondent/Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: February 4, 2003 Filed: February 4, 2003

___________ Before BOWMAN, MORRIS S. ARNOLD, and BYE, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Before us is Kenneth Kenley's federal habeas claim that he has been subjected to cruel and unusual punishment because 1) the Missouri Department of Corrections has been deliberately indifferent to his safety by exposing him to the hepatitis C virus and to his health by failing to properly treat his hepatitis C infection, and 2) he is incompetent to be executed under the standard enunciated in Ford v. Wainwright , 477 U.S. 399 (1986).-2- The district court dismissed Kenley's hepatitis C claims finding the claims not cognizable under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We affirm the district court's dismissal of those claims. The district court found Kenley's Ford competency claim to be a second or successive habeas petition, and correctly noted that no application had been made to the court of appeals for authorization to bring such a petition. The district court therefore concluded that it lacked authorization to consider the merits of the claim. Instead, the district court transferred the claim to this court. We think the district court erred in concluding Kenley's competency claim amounts to a second or successive petition. Kenley's petition challenges the execution of his sentence, not his conviction, and could not have been raised in his first habeas petition because it was not ripe. See Crouch v. Norris , 251 F.3d 720, 724 (8th Cir. 2001); see also Scott v. Mitchell , 250 F.3d 1011, 1013 (6th Cir. 2001) (holding Ford claim was not second or successive petition because it was not ripe at time petitioner filed initial habeas petition). Because of the urgency of the matter, we now address the merits of Kenley's competency claim rather than remanding to the district court. In his pleadings, Kenley argues he is unable to discuss and comprehend the reasons that his punishment should not be carried out. Kenley concedes, however, that he understands the nature and purpose of the punishment to which he is subject. He therefore has not stated a valid Fordclaim. See Rector v. Clark , 923 F.2d 570 (8th Cir. 1991) ("the Ford majority found the Eighth Amendment prevented the execution of 'one whose mental illness prevents him from comprehending the reasons for the penalty or its implications.'") (citing Ford , 477 U.S. at 417). Additionally, because the medications he is receiving are voluntary, there is no issue of forced medication to assure competency. Accordingly, habeas relief on this claim is denied.-3- Kenley's motion for a stay of execution is also denied. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration

          - [TA-W-73,756]

                    On July 19, 2010, the Department issued a determination regarding workers' eligibility to apply for Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The Department's Notice of Determination was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on August 6, 2010 (75 FR 47635).                

The initial investigation resulted in a negative determination based on the findings that there was no increase in imports or shift to/acquisition from a foreign country of decommissioning services by the workers' firm, and that the workers' firm did not produce an article or supply a service that was used by a firm with workers eligible to apply for TAA in the production of an article or supply of a service that was the basis for TAA-certification.

Subsequent to the issuance of the negative determination, the Department was informed of a mistake in fact in the case at hand.

Based on this new information, the Department has determined that it is appropriate for the Department to conduct further investigation to determine if the workers meet the eligibility requirements of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.

## Conclusion

After careful review, I conclude that a reconsideration of the U.S. Department of Labor's prior decision is appropriate.

Signed at Washington, DC, this 13th day of August, 2010.

Del Min Amy Chen,

Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2010-28489 Filed 11-10-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsLunar robotic maintenance moduleA design for a robotic maintenance module that will assist a mobile 100-meter lunar drill is introduced. The design considers the following areas of interest: the atmospheric conditions, actuator systems, power supply, material selection, weight, cooling system and operation.Document ID19900014419Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsAyres, Michael L.*(Georgia Inst. of Tech. Atlanta, GA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateDecember 1, 1988Subject CategoryMechanical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-183071NAS 1.26:183071ME-4182Accession Number90N23735Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NGT-21-002-800Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900014419.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 222 (Thursday, November 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70739-70740]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29032]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

 [Docket No. ER11-1962-000]


Wheelabrator North Broward Inc.; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

November 8, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Wheelabrator North Broward Inc.'s application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is November 29, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission,

[[Page 70740]]

888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#692f2c3b2a26070500070c3a1c1919061b1d290f0c1b0a470e061f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bff9faedfcf0d1d3d6d1daeccacfcfd0cdcbffd9dacddc91d8d0c9">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-29032 Filed 11-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
FORM
6-K

SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON,
D. C. 20549




---

REPORT
OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER

Pursuant
to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For
the month of March 2003

Commission
File Number: 000-12713




---

NEC
CORPORATION

(Translation
of registrant's name into English)




---

7-1,
Shiba 5-chome Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan

(Address
of principal executive offices)




---




Form 20-F  [ X ]      Form 40-F [     ]

Yes  [     ]      No [ X ]



---

SIGNATURE



NEC
CORPORATION(Registrant)By:


/S/
    FUJIO OKADAFujio Okada
General Manager, Legal Divison




---












---



The
Current Report (Summary)



<COVER>
        (omitted)



<CONTENTS>



1.
Reason for filing

At
the meeting of the Board of Directors of NEC Corporation (the "Company") held on March
11, 2003, it was resolved that Mr. Akinobu Kanasugi be appointed
as a representative director, effective as of March 28, 2003 and he
assumed office of a representative director on March 28,
2003. The Company filed this Current
Report pursuant to Paragraph 4 of Article 24-5 of the Securities and
Exchange Law of Japan and Item 9 of Paragraph 2 of Article 19 of the
Cabinet Office Ordinance with respect to Disclosure of Companies' Affairs.



2.
Matters to be reported

(1)
Name, title and date of birth of the newly appointed representative director

|Name:                                | Akinobu
				Kanasugi                                
|------------------------------------ | ----------------------------------------------------
|Title
				before the effective date: | Executive
				Vice President and Member of the Board
|Title
				after the effective date:  | President
				(representative director)             
|Date of birth:                       | April
				17, 1941                                  



(2)
Effective date

March
28, 2003



(3)
Number of shares of the Company held by the newly appointed representative director
as of the effective date





(4)
Career summary of the newly appointed representative director

|July
				1967  | Joined
				the Company                                                                          
|-------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|July
				1993  | Vice
				President and Executive General Manager, 4th C&C Systems
				Operations Unit           
|June
				1995  | Member
				of the Board                                                                         
|June
				1999  | Senior
				Vice President and Member of the Board                                               
|April
				2000 | Senior
				Vice President and Member of the Board, and Company
				President of NEC Solutions   
|June
				2000  | Executive
				Vice President and Member of the Board, and Company
				President of NEC Solutions