alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### David Green et al., Appellants, v. Hempstead Bank, Respondent.

Order entered July 11, 1966, herein appealed from, unanimously modified on the law to grant partial summary judgment to appellant in the amount of $1,140.80 and as so modified is otherwise affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to respondent. The parties disagree on the interpretation to be accorded paragraph 52 of a lease executed by and between defendant as tenant and plaintiffs’ predecessor in interest as landlord. The provision in question states in substance that the tenant agrees to pay as additional rent any and all increases of real estate taxes greater than such taxes imposed on the property for the first full year as fully assessed. The taxes originally assessed were later reduced through tax certiorari proceedings. The question involves a construction of the language and the intent of the parties as to whether the' original tax assessed or such tax as subsequently reduced was to represent the base tax upon which the tenant’s additional obligation should be calculated; in other words, what is the basic tax. The defendant tendered the sum of $1,140.80 as the measure of its obligation and the plaintiff refused. Thus under any construction this sum represents an admitted liability and accordingly judg*657ment should be granted for that amount. To that extent there is no triable issue of fact (CPLR 3212). This disposition does not dispose of the basic underlying question of the interpretation to be given paragraph 52. That issue is reserved for trial (see *City Bank Farmers Trust Co.*v. *J. & J. Slater, Inc.,*303 N. Y. 971). Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Tilzer and McNally, JJ.
#### § 1775.19 Grant cancellation or major changes.

Any change in the scope of the project, budget adjustments of more than 10 percent of the total budget, or any other significant change in the project must be reported to and approved by the approval official by written amendment to RUS Guide 1775-1. Any change not approved may be cause for termination of the grant.
Editorial Note on Part 1951
Editorial Notes: 1. Some of the exhibits referenced in this part 1951 are not published in the Code of Federal Regulations. Exhibits are available in any Rural Development office. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 1951 appear at 80 FR 9890-9894, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1951.154 Satisfaction and release of documents. ( a ) *Authorization.* RD is authorized to execute the necessary releases and satisfactions and return security instruments and related documents to borrowers. Satisfaction and release of security documents takes place: ( 1 ) Upon receipt of payment in full of all amounts owed to the Government including any amounts owed to the loan insurance account, subsidy recapture amounts, all loan advances and/or other charges to the borrower's account;
( 2 ) Upon verification that the amount of payment received is sufficient to pay the full amount owed by the borrower; or
( 3 ) When a compromise or adjustment offer has been accepted and approved by the appropriate Government official in full settlement of the account and all required funds have been paid.
( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) *Lost note.* If the original note is lost RD will give the borrower an affidavit of lost note so that the release or satisfaction may be processed.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). N H Y / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T R ON AL D MAG AO AY GA R C I A, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 05- 74903 A ge nc yN o. A 044- 527- 531 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d F e bruary16, 2010 ** B efo re: F E RN A N D E Z , G O U L D , an dM . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. R ona l d M a ga oayG ar c i a , ana t i ve a nd c i t i z e n of the P hi l i ppi ne s , pe t i t i ons f or r e vi e w of

the B oar d of

I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s ’ or de ra f f i rm i ng an i m m i gr a t i on j ud ge’ s dec i si on denyi ng hi s app l i cat i on un der 8 U . S . C . § 1 18 6a(c )( 4)(B ) f or a 

# FI LED FEB 25 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSN H Y / Res ea r ch 05- 74903 2 w a i ve rof

the r e qui r e m e ntt o f

i l e aj oi ntpe t i t i on w i th hi s f orm e rs pous e t o r e m ove the c ondi t i ona l ba s i s of

hi s l aw f ul pe rm ane ntr e s i de nts t a tus . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on p u rs u an t t o 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r ev iew fo r s ub stan ti al ev id en ce th e a g en cy ’s f in d in g o f r e m o v ab ility , N

a ka m o to v . A s h c r o

ft , 363 F . 3d 874, 882 ( 9th C i r . 2004) a n dth e a g e n c y ’s o r d e rd e n y in g th e w a iv e r , D a m o n v . A s h c r o ft , 360 F . 3d 1084, 1 0 8 8 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) . W e d e n yth e p e titio n f o rr e v ie w . S ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e s up p o rts th e a g e n c y ’s f in d in g th a t G ar c iais r e m o v ab le because he f

ai l ed t o sat i sf

y hi s burden o f e st abl i shi ng thathi s m arri age w as ent er ed i nt o i n g oo d fai th si nce he di d n otsubm i tsuff i ci entdo cum ent at i on i nd i cat i ng that h e an dh is f

o rm e rs p o u s e in te n d e dto e s tab lis h alif e to g e th e ra t th e tim e o f th e ir m a rr ia g e . C

f . D am on , 3 6 0 F . 3 dat1 0 8 8 -8 9 (ev i d en ce o f j o i n ti n su ran ce p o l i ci es, prop erty l ea se s, i ncom e t ax form s or bank accounts , and share d res i dence w as s ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e o f

in te n t to e s tab lis h alif

e to g e th e r ) ; s e e al

s o 8 C. F. R. § 2 1 6 .5 ( e ) ( 2 ) ( i) - ( iv ) . P e titio n e r ’s r e m a in in g c o n te n tio n s a r e u n a v a ilin g . P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
EXHIBIT 31.1
 Certification
      a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b.
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  a.
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: November 6, 2008
    /s/ G. Gary YetmanChief Executive Officer and President
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENSACOLA DIVISION 

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCTS LIABILITY 

LITIGATION Judge M. Casey Rogers 

 Magistrate Judge Hope T. Cannon 

This Document Relates to All Cases 

Case No. 3:19-md-02885 

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL 

PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 11.1(H)(1)(B) AND REQUEST FOR 

REMOVAL FROM SERVICE LIST 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, effective immediately, Erica M. Rodriguez is 

no longer with the firm Vorys, Sater, Seymour, and Pease, LLP, and hereby 

withdraws as attorney of record for Defendant 3M Company (“Defendant”) in the 

above referenced multi-district litigation, and should be removed from the docket 

and electronic service list accordingly. As required by Local Rule 11.1 (H)(1)(b), 

Defendant consents to this withdrawal, and the withdrawal will leave Defendant with 

counsel of record who will continue in the case. 

Dated: February 16, 2023 Respectfully submitted, 

By: /s/ Erica M. Rodriguez

Erica M. Rodriguez, Ohio Bar No. 98711 

Vorys, Sater, Seymour, and Pease, LLP 

52 East Gay Street 

Columbus, OH 43215 

Telephone: (614) 464-6400 

Email: emrodriguez@vorys.com

Counsel for Defendant 3M Company 

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3671 Filed 02/16/23 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on February 16, 2023, a true copy of the foregoing was 

filed on the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to all parties 

and counsel in this case. 

/s/ Erica M. Rodriguez 

Erica M. Rodriguez 

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3671 Filed 02/16/23 Page 2 of 2
#### George E. Alford, as Administrator of the Estate of Donna J. Alford, Deceased, Respondent, v Timothy J. Sventek et al., Appellants.

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and verdict reinstated. Memorandum: Plaintiff’s decedent was killed in an automobile accident when her vehicle collided with another owned by defendant Joseph Sventek, and driven by defendant Timothy Sventek. The jury returned a verdict of no cause of action. A poll of the jurors showed that the vote was five to one; juror Dengler voting consistently in plaintiff’s favor. Thereafter, plaintiff obtained an order to show cause why the jury verdict should not be set aside on the ground that it was subject to outside influence, was inconsistent and against the weight of the evidence. An affidavit of juror Dengler, submitted by plaintiff with the show cause order, recited that he had made an unauthorized visit to the accident scene. At a hearing conducted by the Trial Judge, juror Dengler testified that he had visited the scene of the accident after the close of the evidence and that he had driven his automobile around the curve in the road where the accident occurred, in the manner in which it swerved. He informed the other jurors of this during their deliberations. The Judge set aside the jury verdict and ordered a new trial on the ground that the jury was subject to outside influences. The general rule that a juror may not impeach his own verdict does not apply to instances of prejudicial conduct occurring outside of the jury room *(People v De Lucia,*20 NY2d 275). However, before setting aside a verdict because of outside influences, the court must examine whether such outside influences were prejudicial and likely to influence the verdict (see *Payne v Burke,*236 App Div 527; *Haight v City of Elmira,*42 App Div 391; *Sindle v 761 Ninth Ave. Corp.,*127 NYS2d 258, affd 283 App Div 939). We find that the plaintiff’s assertion that he was prejudiced by juror Dengler’s unauthorized view of the accident to be without merit inasmuch as juror Dengler consistently voted in plaintiff’s favor on all causes of action. Accordingly, the court erred in setting aside the jury verdict for defendant. (Appeal from order of Chautauqua Supreme Court—new trial.) Present—Simons, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Doerr, Witmer and Moule, JJ.
**Exhibit 15**

 

July 31, 2008

 

MWIVeterinary Supply, Inc.Meridian, ID

 

Wehave reviewed, in accordance with the standards of the Public CompanyAccounting Oversight Board (United States), the unaudited interim financialinformation of MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc. and subsidiaries for theperiods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, as indicated in our report dated July 31,2008; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on thatinformation.

 

We areaware that our report referred to above, which is included in your QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, isincorporated by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-127879,333-127880, and 333-149275 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-141078on Form S-3.

 

We alsoare aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) underthe Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the RegistrationStatement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared orcertified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

 

 

/s/ DELOITTE &TOUCHE LLP

Boise, Idaho

 

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 1951

#### Editorial Notes:

1. Some of the exhibits referenced in this part 1951 are not published in the Code of Federal Regulations. Exhibits are available in any Rural Development office.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1951 appear at 80 FR 9890-9894, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1951.214 Care, management, and disposal of acquired property.

Property acquired by Government or its successor agency under Public Law 103-354 will be handled according to subparts B and C of part 1955 of this chapter.

[55 FR 4399, Feb. 8, 1990, as amended at 63 FR 16089, Apr. 2, 1998]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsControl strategy for cooperating disparate manipulatorsTo manipulate large payloads typical of space construction, the concept of a small arm mounted on the end of a large arm is introduced. The main purposes of such a configuration are to increase the structural stiffness of the robot by bracing against or locking to a stationary frame, and to maintain a firm position constraint between the robot's base and workpieces by grasping them. Possible topologies for a combination of disparate large and small arms are discussed, and kinematics, dynamics, controls, and coordination of the two arms, especially when they brace at the tip of the small arm, are developed. The feasibility and improvement in performance are verified, not only with analytical work and simulation results but also with experiments on the existing arrangement Robotic Arm Large and Flexible and Small Articulated Manipulator.Document ID19900017012Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsLew, Jae Young*(Georgia Inst. of Tech. Atlanta, GA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1989Subject CategoryMechanical EngineeringReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:186809NASA-CR-186809Accession Number90N26328Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG1-623Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900017012.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsA resistance strain gage with repeatable and cancellable apparent strain for use to 800 CA temperature compensated static strain gage, which is fabricated from palladium-13w/o chromium (Pd13Cr) alloy and a platinum (Pt) compensator, is being developed and was tested over a temperature range to 800 C at NASA-Lewis. The PdCr compensated strain gage has significantly lower apparent strain to 800 C than other high temperature strain gages. The PdCr compensated gage is protected from oxidation by a flame-sprayed alumina-4w/o zirconia overcoating. Test results to 800 C indicate apparent strain variations of less than 300 micro-epsilon and reproducibility between thermal cycles within 50 micro-epsilon. Apparent strain of the coated PdCr compensated gage can be predicted and cancelled due to its reproducibility and low value.Document ID19900016747Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsLei, Jih-Fen*(Sverdrup Technology, Inc. Brook Park, OH, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 1990Subject CategorySpacecraft InstrumentationReport/Patent NumberNASA-CR-185256NAS 1.26:185256E-5577Meeting InformationMeeting: Spring Conference on Experimental MechanicsLocation: Albuquerque, NMCountry: United StatesStart Date: June 4, 1990End Date: June 6, 1990Sponsors:Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc.Accession Number90N26063Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 505-62-01CONTRACT_GRANT: NAS3-25266Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900016747.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
UNITED
STATES


SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington,
D.C. 20549








FORM
8-K CURRENT
REPORT





Pursuant
to Section 13 or 15(d) of the


Securities
Exchange Act of 1934








March
25, 2009


Date of
Report (Date of earliest event reported)





NICOR
INC.


(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)








Illinois
            1-7297
            36-2855175(State
      or other jurisdiction
            (Commission
            (I.R.S.
      Employerof
      incorporation)
            File
      Number)
            Identification
      Number)








1844
Ferry Road


Naperville,
Illinois 60563-9600


(Address
of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)





(630)
305-9500


(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)








Check the
appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously
satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following
provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):




[  ]           Written
communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR
230.425)




[  ]           Soliciting
material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14a-12)




[  ]           Pre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))




[  ]           Pre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))


















Page 1





Item8.01             
Other Events.





On March
25, 2009, Nicor Inc. issued a press release announcing that the Illinois
Commerce Commission approved a base rate increase for its natural gas
distribution company, Northern Illinois Gas Company d/b/a Nicor Gas
Company.





A copy of
the press release is filed as Exhibit 99.01 to this Current Report on Form 8-K
and is incorporated herein by reference.





Item
9.01   Financial Statements and
Exhibits.





(d)
            Exhibits





99.01 
            Press release
of Nicor Inc. issued March 25, 2009










Page 2




Signature





Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto
duly authorized.














Nicor Inc.








Date March 25, 2009      
                               /s/ KAREN K.
PEPPING


Karen K. Pepping


Vice
President, Controller


( Principal
Accounting Officer and













Page
3





Exhibit
Index





Exhibit


Number            
Description of
Documents




99.01         
     Press release of Nicor Inc. issued March 25,
2009
Order entered March 22, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 01160
- CV
RICHARD GEHRKE AND P ACIFIC COMPANIES, IN C., Appellant s V. MERRITT HAWKINS AND ASSOCIATES, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 18
- 09562



### O RDER Before Justices Whitehill, Molberg, and Nowell
We REINSTATE this appeal. This is an accelerated appeal from a temporary injuncti on. By order dated February 14, 2019, we lifted the automatic stay imposed by section 51.014(b) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code and abated this appeal to allow the parties to conduct discovery related to the alleged violations of the tempora ry injunction and to allow the trial court to conduct an evidentiary hearing on appellants’ motion to enforce the temporary injunction. Before the Court is appellants’ March 15, 2019 agreed motion seeking a thirty

- day extension for the trial court to condu ct the enforcement hearing and grant in writing any appropriate relief. We GRANT the motion.We ORDER the trial court to conduct the hearing and grant in writing any appropriate relief

by April 25, 2019

. We ORDER Felicia Pitre, Dallas County District Cle rk, to file, by April 30, 2019 , a supplemental clerk’s record containing any signed order on appellants’ emergency motion to enforce or written notification that the trial court did not sign an order on the motion.
We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to sen d a copy of this order to the Honorable Emily Tobolowsky, Presiding Judge of the 298th Judicial District Court; Ms. Pitre; and all parties.
We ABATE this appeal to allow the trial court to comply with this Court’s order. The appeal will be reinstated on A pril 30, 2019 or when the Court receives the requested supplemental clerk’s record, whichever occurs sooner. /s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
#### Harris B. Greenberg, appellant, v. Martin A. Howell, appellee.

Gen. No. 33,232.

Opinion filed May 31, 1929.

Isidore Fried, for appellant; Bernard A. Stol, of counsel. Hutson & Traeger, for appellee; John Donald Bolger, of counsel.

Mr. Presiding Justice Gridley

delivered the opinion of the court.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

SHAWN STEVEN GIRARD,

SRCJ Inmate No. 99015707,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:19cv4922/RV/EMT

SHERIFF BOB JOHNSON and

WELLPATH MEDICAL,

Defendants.

___________________________/

O R D E R

This cause comes on for consideration upon the chief magistrate judge’s 

Report and Recommendation dated May 22, 2020 (ECF No. 11). The court is unable 

to provide Plaintiff a copy of the Report and Recommendation due to the fact that 

Plaintiff did not update his address upon being released from the Santa Rosa County 

Jail. Nevertheless, having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have 

determined the Report and Recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted 

and incorporated by reference in this order.

Case 3:19-cv-04922-RV-EMT Document 12 Filed 06/26/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 3:19cv4922/RV/EMT

2. This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff=s failure to 

comply with an order of the court and failure to keep the court apprised of his current 

address.

DONE AND ORDERED this 26th day of June, 2020.

/s/ Roger Vinson 

ROGER VINSON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:19-cv-04922-RV-EMT Document 12 Filed 06/26/20 Page 2 of 2