DISMISS; and Opinion Filed July 9, 2013. 

# S

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 00760

- CR

No. 05

- 13

- 00761

- CR

No. 05

- 13

- 00762

- CR

No. 05

- 13

- 00763

- CR

No. 05

- 13

- 00764

- CR

FLOYD DALE KNIGHT , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 382nd Judicial District Court Rockwall County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 2

- 13

- 66, 2

- 13

- 228, 2

- 13

- 106, 2

- 13

- 107, 2

- 13

- 108

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices O’ Neill, Francis, and Fillmore Opinion by Justice O’Neill

Floyd Dale Knight was convicted of two offenses of possession with intent to deliver a

controlled substance in an amount less than one gram in a drug free zone and three offenses of

possession with i ntent to deliver a controlled substance in an amount of one gram or more but

less than four grams in a drug free zone. Pursuant to plea agreements, the trial court assessed

punishment at ten years’ imprisonment and a $1,000 fine in each case. Appellant w aived his

right to appeal in connection with the plea agreements. See Blanco v. State

, 18 S.W.3d 218, 219

–

20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000) . The trial court certified both that appellant waived his right to appeal

and that the cases involve plea bargains and appel lant has no right to appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

.

25.2(d); Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).– 2

– We dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction.

Do Not Publish

T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 47

130760F.U05 /Michael J. O'Neill/

MICHAEL J. O'NEILL

JUSTICE– 3

– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

FLOYD DALE KNIGHT, Appellant

No. 05

- 13

- 00760

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 382nd Judicial District
Court, Rockwall County, Texas

Trial Co urt Cause No. 2

- 13

- 66.
Opinion delivered by Justice O’Neill.
Justices Francis and Fillmore participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Judgment entered this 9 th day of July, 2013.

/Michael J. O'Neill/

MICHAEL J. O'NEILL

JUSTICE– 4

– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

FLOYD DALE KNIGHT, Appellant

No. 05

- 13

- 00761

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 382nd Judicial District
Court, Rockwall County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2

- 13

- 228.
Opinion delivered by Justice O’Neill.
Justices Francis and Fillmore participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Judg ment entered this 9 th day of July, 2013.

/Michael J. O'Neill/

MICHAEL J. O'NEILL

JUSTICE– 5

– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

FLOYD DALE KNIGHT, Appellant

No. 05

- 13

- 00762

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 382nd Judicial District
Court, Rockwall County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2

- 13

- 106.
Opinion delivered by Justice O’Neill.
Justices Francis and Fillmore participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Judgment entered this 9 th day of July, 2013.

/Michael J. O'Neill/

MICHAEL J. O'NEILL

JUSTICE– 6

– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

FLOYD DALE KNIGHT, Appellant

No. 05

- 13

- 00763

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 382nd Judicial District
Court, Rockwall County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2

- 13

- 107.
Opinion delivered by Justice O’Neill.
Justices Francis and Fillmore participating.

Bas ed on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Judgment entered this 9 th day of July, 2013.

/Michael J. O'Neill/

MICHAEL J. O'NEILL

JUSTICE– 7

– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

FLOYD DALE KNIGHT, Appellant

No. 05

- 13

- 00764

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 382nd Judicial District
Court, Rockwall County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2

- 13

- 108.
Opinion delivered by Justice O’Neill.

Justice s Francis and Fillmore participating.

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Judgment entered this 9 th day of July, 2013.

/Michael J. O'Neill/

MICHAEL J. O'NEILL

JUSTICE