alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 1924

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1924 appear at 80 FR 9870, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1924.122 Exception authority.

The Administrator of RHS may in individual cases, make an exception to any requirement or provision of this subpart or address any omission of this subpart which is not inconsistent with the authorizing statute or other applicable law if the Administrator determines that application of the requirement or provision would adversely affect the Government's interest. The Administrator will exercise this authority upon the written request of the state director or the appropriate program assistant administrator. Requests for exceptions must be supported with documentation to explain the adverse effect on the Government, proposed alternative courses of action, and show how the adverse effect will be eliminated or minimized if the exception is granted.
#### McCormick *vs.*Young.

Debt.

The covenant of a lessee to pay rent, concerns the realty, and *hinds his assignee*for the rent due after the assignment. Notes or bonds given for rent, the payment of which is secured by lease, not being of higher nature, do not extinguish the rent for which the assignee of the lease is liable, notwithsthing thelandlord may have taken the notes of his lessee, for it.

[Mr. Crittenden for Plaintiff : ■ no appearance for Defendant.]

From the Circuit Court for Livingston County.

*October*21.

J udge Underwood

delivered the Opinion of the Court.

“Upon a covenant running with the land, which must concern real property or the estate therein, the assignee of the lessee is liable to an action for a breach of covenant committed after the assignment of the. estate to him.” 1 *Chitty’s Plead.*55.

Young, as the assignee of McCormick’s lessee, was liable, in the action of debt, for the rent reserved, and which became due, for the use of the premises, after the assignment of thc.whole term to Young.

It is true, that McCormick’s lessee executed notes for the amount of rent reserved, on the day the covenant or lease was entered into. But these notes do not extinguish the rent — “The acceptance, by a landlord, of a bond for rent, is no extinguishment of the. rent, because the rent issuing out of the realty is a debt of as high a nature asa specialty claim.” 1 *Chitty’s Plead.*119. It does not appear, that Young parted with the term by assignment after it came to him, so as to discharge himself in any manner.

The covenant contains a promise to pay so much rent quarterly. This covenant in consequence of the privity of estate, bound Young, the assignee of the term.

The declaration sets forth such facts as shew that the plaintiff was entitled to recover; and we think they were substantially proved. We do not perceive any sufficient ground to justify the instruction to find as in case of non-suit.

Judgment reversed, with costs, and cause remanded for a new trial.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsCurvature continuity of cubic Bezier curves in the solid modeling aerospace research tools design softwarePreliminary results are presented of an investigation into the development of a procedure to provide curvature continuity between biparametric cubic Bezier surface patches in the computer-aided design package known as SMART (Solid Modeling Aerospace Research Tools). This initial effort was aimed at providing the designer with the ability to locally impose curvature continuity at the intersection of two Bezier curves without disrupting either the curvature or slope continuity that may exist at the ends of these curves. Such a method was found if the original Bezier control points are all coplanar. If they are not, then it is possible to find a minimum deviation from exact curvature continuity. In cases where this is not sufficient, then an entire piecewise curve must be made curvature continuous simultaneously. A method was developed based on cubic splines which is very fast. The procedure returns new Bezier control points which have both slope and curvature continuity.Document ID19900012238Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsRoach, Robert L.*(Georgia Inst. of Tech. Atlanta, GA, United States)*Forrest, John R.*(Georgia Inst. of Tech. Atlanta, GA, United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJanuary 1, 1990Subject CategoryComputer Programming And SoftwareReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:186583NASA-CR-186583Accession Number90N21554Funding Number(s)CONTRACT_GRANT: NAG1-1039Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900012238.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 1786.155 Eligible borrower. ( a ) To be eligible to prepay an electric loan under this subpart, the borrower must be in compliance with the following: ( 1 ) The borrower shall be current on all payment obligations on outstanding loans made or guaranteed by RUS. For the purpose of determining eligibility for prepayment, a default by a power supply borrower from which a distribution borrower purchases wholesale power shall not be considered a default by the distribution borrower;
( 2 ) There shall exist no material defaults under the borrower's RUS Loan Contract and Mortgage;
( 3 ) The borrower shall have expended all funds advanced pursuant to the RUS Loan Contract for the purposes for which such funds were advanced. A borrower will not be eligible to prepay under this subpart if it has any funds advanced pursuant to the RUS Loan Contract in its Construction Fund Account; and
( 4 ) The borrower shall be current on all obligations under any wholesale power contract with an RUS financed power supply borrower.
( b ) The eligibility of borrowers that have had any indebtedness representing loans made or guaranteed by RUS restructured shall be determined on a case by case basis considering the terms and conditions of the restructuring agreement.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1980

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1980 appear at 80 FR 9905, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1980.496 Exception authority.

The Administrator may in individual cases grant an exception to any requirement or provision of this subpart which is not inconsistent with any applicable law or opinion of the Comptroller General, provided the Administrator determines that application of the requirement or provision would adversely affect the Government's interest. Requests for exceptions must be in writing by the State Director and submitted through the Assistant Administrator, Community and Business Programs. Requests must be supported with documentation to explain the adverse effect on the Government's interest, propose alternative courses of action, and show how the adverse effect will be eliminated or minimized if the exception is granted.
M. P. No. 79-310.

#### Pamela Lotito *v.*Ciro J. Lotito, Jr.

*McKinnon and Fortunato, Stephen J. Fortunato, Jr., Amy R. Tabor,*for plaintiff-respondent. *Aram K. Berberian,*for defendant-petitioner.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.
Editorial Note on Part 1955
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1955 appear at 80 FR 9895, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1955.131 Auctioneers. The services of licensed auctioneers, if required, may be used to conduct auction sales as described in § 1955.148 of this subpart and procured by competitive negotiation under the contracting authority of Exhibit C to RD Instruction 2024-A (available in any Rural Development office). ( a ) *Selection criteria.* The auctioneer should be selected by evaluating criteria such as proposed sales dates, location, advertising, broker cooperation, innovations, mechanics of sale, sample advertising, personal qualifications, financial capability, private sector financing and license/bonding.
( b ) *Commission.* Rural Development may not set the commission rate in an auctioneer solicitation/contract. The rate of commission will be one of the evaluation criteria in the solicitation. However, any offeror that submits an offer with a commission rate lower than the typical rate for such services in the area must include documentation that they have successfully sold properties at the lower rate with no compromise in services. The solicitation/contract will explicitly detail this policy. Commissions will be paid at closing if sufficient cash to cover the commission is paid by the purchaser. Otherwise, the commission will be paid by the appropriate Rural Development official completing Form AD-838 and processing Form RD 838-B for payment in accordance with the respective FMI's, and charged to the inventory account as a nonrecoverable cost.
( c ) *Auctioneer restriction.* The auctioneer, his/her sales agents, cooperating brokers or persons living in his, her or their immediate household are restricted from bidding or from subsequent purchase of any property sold or offered at the auctioneer's sale for a period of one year from the auction date.
[50 FR 23904, June 7, 1985, as amended at 53 FR 27837, July 25, 1988]
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Section 906Certification**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), the undersigned officer of GuarantyBancorp (the “Company”) hereby certifies that the Company’s QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated:July 31, 2009

 

 
|   | /s/  Daniel M. Quinn |
|--------|----------------------|
|   | Name:                | Daniel M. Quinn |
|   | Title:               | *Chief  Executive Officer* |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnishedsolely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C. Section 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as aseparate disclosure document.

 

1

----
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 187 

To correct the boundaries of the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources 

System Unit L06, Topsail, North Carolina. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2013 

Mr. JONES introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To correct the boundaries of the John H. Chafee Coastal 

Barrier Resources System Unit L06, Topsail, North 

Carolina. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL 

4 BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM MAP. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The map included in the set of 

6 maps entitled ‘‘Coastal Barrier Resources System’’ re7 ferred to in section 4(a) of the Coastal Barrier Resources 

8 Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)) and relating to Unit L06 in 

9 North Carolina is hereby replaced by another map relating 

10 to the same unit entitled ‘‘John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with 
2 

•HR 187 IH

1 Resources System Corrected Unit L06’’ and dated 

2 llllll. 

3 (b) AVAILABILITY.—The Secretary of the Interior 

4 shall keep the replacement map referred to in subsection 

5 (a) on file and available for inspection in accordance with 

6 section 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 

7 U.S.C. 3503(b)). 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with
NUMBER 13-21-00262-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

 

ARAN & FRANKLIN ENGINEERING, INC., Appellant,

v.

CHRIS ZODY D/B/A NEW MILLENIUM 

CONSTRUCTION GROUP, Appellee.

 

On appeal from the 36th District Court

of Aransas County, Texas.

 

ORDER

Before Justices Longoria, Hinojosa, and Tijerina

Order Per Curiam

Appellant Aran & Franklin Engineering, Inc. has filed an emergency motion to stay 

in the above-referenced cause through which it requests that we stay the trial of this 

matter and all underlying proceedings pending the resolution of its interlocutory appeal
2

under Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code § 150.002. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM.

CODE ANN. § 150.002(f). Appellee, Chris Zody d/b/a New Millennium Construction Group, 

filed a response to appellant’s emergency motion, and appellant filed a reply thereto. 

Hidden Oaks Association, Inc. has also filed a response to appellant’s emergency motion 

to stay.

The Court, having examined and fully considered appellant’s motion and the 

responses thereto, is of the opinion that appellant’s emergency motion to stay should be 

granted. Accordingly, we grant appellant’s emergency motion to stay proceedings and we 

order all trial court proceedings to be stayed pending further order of this Court. 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed on the

31st day of August, 2021.
#### § 1900.51 Definitions.

*Act* means the Federal Crop Insurance Reform and Department of Agriculture Reorganization Act of 1994, Public Law No. 103-354 (7 U.S.C. 6991 *et seq.*).

*Agency* means the Rural Utilities Service (RUS), the Rural Housing Service (RHS), and the Rural Business-Cooperative Development Service (RBS), or their successor agencies.

Refer to 7 CFR 11.1 for other definitions applicable to appeals of adverse decisions covered by this subpart.
U .S . Depo lilie li t of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration



## DEC**:~ .l~** **9** 

### Mr. Alvaro Pillar Executive Director Puerto Rico Ports Authority 64 Lindbergh Street Isla Grande. PR 0 0907 Dear Mr. Pillar: Airport Compliance and Field Operations 800 Independence Ave . • SN . Washington. DC 20591

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is pleased to inform you that your preliminary application for Luis Munoz Marin International Airport' s (SJU) participation in the Airport Privatization Pilot Program is accepted for further review . The application is designated as FAA Docket Number 2009 - 1144 , and 

### it can 

### be viewed at www. regulations.gov . The next step for the Puerto Rico Ports Authority (the Authority) is to is s ue its reque s t-forproposals, select a private operator, negotiate an agreement and submit a fmal application . December 1 , 2009 , is noted as the filing date of this preliminary application. Thi s was the FAA's date of receipt of the preliminary application . Our acceptance of this preliminary application for review is contingent on the Authority' s continued compliance with the procedural requirements of Title 49 U .S .C. 

### § 47134 . The final application when submitted, must include a title search of all federally obligated property and all fmancial te rms of the transaction identified in FAA 's 

### Notice of final application procedures for the Airport Privatization Pilot Program, Application Procedures, 62 Federal Register 48693- 48708 (September 16 . 1997) (Notice) (as modified. 62 FR 63211 . Nov . 26. 1997). If the FAA approves the final application for Luis Munoz Marin International Airport ' s participation 

### in the pilot**program ~**  the Authority can only lease the Airport; the Pilot Program does not allow the sale of commercial service airports . We would like to arrange a meeting at your convenience with either you or a member of your senior 

### staff , and consultant to discuss the specific details of your proposal. If you have any questions . please contact Kevin Willis , Airport Compliance O ffi cer at 202 -267- 8741. Thank you . Sincerely,

Randall S . Fiertz Director of Airport Compliance

and Field Operations cc: Jorge Gonzalez, Infrastructure Management Group
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 4, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 284]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-33728]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE U.S.

[Public Notice 2011-076]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Final Collection; 
Comment Request

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the U.S.

ACTION: Submission for OMB Review and Comments Request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Form Title: Used Equipment Questionnaire (EIB 11-03).

SUMMARY: The Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank), as a 
part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent 
burden, invites the general public and other Federal Agencies to 
comment on the proposed information collection, as required by the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
    The collection will provide information needed to determine 
compliance and creditworthiness for transaction requests submitted to 
Ex-Im Bank under its insurance, guarantee, and direct loan programs. 
Information presented in this form will be considered in the overall 
evaluation of the transaction, including Export-Import Bank's 
determination of the appropriate term for the transaction.
    The form can be viewed at: http://www.exim.gov/pub/pending/eib11-03.pdf.

DATES: Comments should be received on or before to be assured of 
consideration.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted electronically on http://www.regulations.gov or by mail to Office of Information and Regulatory 
Affairs, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20038, attn: OMB 3048-NEW.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Titles and Form Number: EIB 11-03 Used Equipment Questionnaire.
    OMB Number: 3048-xxxx.
    Type of Review: New.
    Need and Use: The information collected will provide information 
needed to determine compliance and creditworthiness for transaction 
requests submitted to the Export-Import Bank under its insurance, 
guarantee, and direct loan programs.
    Affected Public: This form affects entities involved in the export 
of U.S. goods and services.
    Annual Number of Respondents: 1,000.
    Estimated Time per Respondent: 15 minutes.
    Government Annual Burden Hours: 250 hours.
    Frequency of Reporting or Use: On occasion.
    Total Cost to the Government: $9,760.00.

Sharon A. Whitt,
Agency Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-33728 Filed 1-3-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - 17 CFR Part 240
          - [Release No. 34-61414A; File No. S7-04-10]
          - RIN 3235-AK54

# AGENCY:

Securities and Exchange Commission.

# ACTION:

Proposed rule; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        On January 29, 2010, at 75 FR 4713, the Securities and Exchange Commission published in the                         **Federal Register**                         a proposed rule, titled, “Purchases of Certain Equity Securities by the Issuer and Others.” The proposed rule was published with an incorrect Regulation Identifier Number (RIN). This document corrects that error.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Joan Collopy, (202) 551-5720.

## Correction

In proposed rule FR Doc. 2010-1856, beginning on page 4713 in the issue of January 29, 2010, the RIN is corrected as set forth above.

Dated: Dated: February 4, 2010.

Elizabeth E. Murphy,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-2856 Filed 2-9-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
§ 1738.253 Servicing of loan and loan/grant combinations. ( a ) Borrowers must make payments on the broadband loan as required in the note.
( b ) Awardees must comply with all terms, conditions, affirmative covenants, and negative covenants contained in the Award documents.
( c ) In the event of default of any required payment or other term or condition: ( 1 ) The Agency may exercise the default remedies provided in the Award documents and any remedy permitted by law but is not required to do so.
( 2 ) If the Agency chooses not to exercise its default remedies, it does not waive its right to do so in the future.
#### In the Matter of Sophie Blizniak, Appellant, v Raymond T. Blizniak, Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Inasmuch as the Nevada divorce decree contained no provision for alimony, Family Court was without power to modify it to include an award of alimony *(Matter of Silver v Silver,*36 NY2d 324; see, also, *Beaverson v Beaverson,*72 AD2d 963). Our affirmance is without prejudice, however, to plaintiff bringing an action for a separation or divorce in which she seeks an award of alimony (see Domestic Relations Law, § 236). The prior finding that the Nevada decree is binding on the plaintiff insofar as it determines marital status would not preclude such action (see *Janowski v Janowski,*58 AD2d 980). (Appeal from order of Erie County Family Court—alimony.) Present—Simons, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Callahan and Witmer, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1956

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1956 appear at 80 FR 9901, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1956.150 OMB control number.

The reporting requirements contained in this regulation have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget and assigned OMB control number 0575-0124. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to vary from 1⁄2 hour to 30 hours per response with an average of 8.14 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Department of Agriculture, Clearance Officer, OIRM, Ag Box 7630, Washington, D.C. 20250; and to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503.

[59 FR 46162, Sept. 7, 1994]