alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1783.13 What administrative expenses may be funded with grant proceeds?

RFP grant funds may not be used for any purposes not described in § 1783.12, including, without limitation, payment or reimbursement of any of the grant recipient's administrative costs or expenses. Administrative expenses may, however, be paid or reimbursed from revolving loan fund assets that are not RFP grant funds, including revolved funds and cash originally contributed by the grant recipient.
Exhibit 32.1





Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Maidenform Brands, Inc.
(the “Company”) for the quarter ended October 3, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Maurice
S. Reznik, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Maurice S. ReznikMaurice
      S. ReznikChief
      Executive Officer(principal
      executive officer)





November
12, 2009





This certification shall not be
deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, nor shall it be
deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act
of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent the Company
specifically incorporates it by reference.
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

FLORENTINO MAESTAS, JR., Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 17-0267 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2011-111810-001

The Honorable Christopher A. Coury, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney's Office, Phoenix

By Diane Meloche

Counsel for Respondent

Florentino Maestas, Jr., Florence

Petitioner

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Lawrence F. Winthrop, Judge Diane M. Johnsen and Judge 

Maria Elena Cruz delivered the decision of the Court.

FILED 12-12-2017
STATE v. MAESTAS

Decision of the Court

2

PER CURIAM: 

¶1 Petitioner Florentino Maestas, Jr. seeks review of the superior 

court's order denying his petition for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant 

to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is petitioner's second 

petition.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will 

not disturb a superior court's ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. 

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner's burden to 

show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition 

for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) 

(petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court's order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition 

for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of 

discretion. 

¶4 For the foregoing reasons, we grant review and deny relief.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Arthur F. Helf                   |   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Arthur F. Helf                       |
|   |   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   |                                 |
|   |   | Dated : August 1, 2005          |

 

1

----
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta name="pdf:PDFVersion" content="1.2">
<meta name="xmp:CreatorTool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="pdf:hasXFA" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:modify_annotations" content="true">
<meta name="dc:creator" content="sjh">
<meta name="dcterms:created" content="1998-04-15T11:52:09Z">
<meta name="dcterms:modified" content="1998-04-15T11:52:11Z">
<meta name="dc:format" content="application/pdf; version=1.2">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator_tool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="access_permission:fill_in_form" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:modified" content="1998-04-15T11:52:11Z">
<meta name="pdf:hasCollection" content="false">
<meta name="pdf:encrypted" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Length" content="42942">
<meta name="pdf:hasMarkedContent" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Type" content="application/pdf">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print_faithful" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator" content="sjh">
<meta name="pdf:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_for_accessibility" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:assemble_document" content="true">
<meta name="xmpTPg:NPages" content="1">
<meta name="pdf:hasXMP" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_content" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print" content="true">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParser">
<meta name="access_permission:can_modify" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:created" content="1998-04-15T11:52:09Z">
<title></title>
</head>
<body><div class="page"><p></p>
<p>OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 
</p>
<p>AUSTIN 
</p>
<p>Janunry 13, 1339 </p>
<p></p>
</div>
</body></html>
#### § 1773.10 Access to audit documentation.

Pursuant to the terms of this part and the audit engagement letter, the auditor must make all audit documentation available to RUS, or its designated representative, upon request and must permit RUS, or its designated representative, to photocopy or image all audit documentation.

[88 FR 7565, Feb. 6, 2023]
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906**

 

Inconnection with the quarterly report of Orchids Paper Products Company (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Keith R. Schroeder, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to thebest of my knowledge, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) andSection 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/  Keith R. Schroeder  |
|--------|--------------------------|
|   | Keith  R. Schroeder      |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer |
|   | November 3,  2010   |

 

1

----
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                    |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                    |
| (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. |

 

 
|   | By:                                  | /s/ Arthur F. Helf |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------|--------------------|--------|
|   | Arthur F. Helf                       |
|   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                                 |
|   | Dated: May 15, 2006             |

 

----
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Addressing the Long-Term Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Children and Families      

# Resource: Addressing the Long-Term Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Children and Families

This report identifies social, emotional, behavioral, educational, mental, physical, and economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. The report examines strategies for addressing the challenges the pandemic introduced for children and families in marginalized communities, and provides recommendations for programs, supports, and interventions to counteract the negative effects of the pandemic on child and family well-being. **Learn more.**
Editorial Note on Part 1944
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1944 appear at 80 FR 9885, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1944.654 Debarment and suspension—drug-free workplace. ( a ) For purposes of this subpart, exhibit A of RD Instruction 1940-M (available in any Agency office) requires all Rural Development applicants; for an HPG to sign and submit with their preapplication, Form AD-1047, “Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters—Primary Covered Transactions,” which basically states that the applicant has not been debarred or suspended from Government assistance. Further, all grantees after receiving a HPG must obtain a signed certification (Form AD-1048, “Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion—Lower Tier Covered Transactions”) from all persons or entities (excluding homeowner recipients) that the grantee does business with as a result of the HPG. Grantees are responsible for informing these persons or entities of the provisions of exhibit A of RD Instruction 1940-M (available in any Agency office) and of maintaining Form AD-1048 in the grantee's office.
( b ) Grantees must also be made aware of the Drug-free Workplace Act of 1988 requirements found in exhibit A of RD Instruction 1940-M (available in any Rural Development office). For this subpart, a grantee is defined as any organization who applies for or receives a direct grant from Rural Development. All preapplications must include a signed Form AD-1049, “Certification Regarding Drug-free Workplace Requirements (Grants) Alternative I—Grants Other Than Individuals.”
[58 FR 21894, Apr. 26, 1993, as amended at 61 FR 39851, July 31, 1996]
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 USC, SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

          In connection with the quarterly report of Northern Ethanol, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Dated:  May 19, 2008 | s/Richard Smith_____________________

Richard Smith, Chief Financial Officer |
|----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Appellee

v.

HAROLD MURRAY IV,

Appellant :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 754 CAP

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 31st day of August

, 2017, the Petition for Review of Interlocutory

Orders is DENIED.
Edit CAP 

Page I of2 

Corrective Action Plan for Ohio Rehabilitation Services Commission 

Initial CAP - current status: Partially Saved 

View j[»" M;"k ;;C~mplete ~nd S~b~it t~ ~~ -l ~ Allo;-RlchT~~~i~g J {Not recommended for JAWS users) 

Tips for entering data: Enter dates in 'mm/dd/yyyy' format. Enter numbers without commas. For dollars, do not use 

a dollar sign before the number and round to the nearest dollar. For percentages, do not enter the percent sign. 

Enter 77.23% as 77.23, not as 0.7723. 

Monitoring Report URL (MS 

Word) <D 

r 

Monitoring Report URL (PDF) 

<D 

Monitoring Report Publication 

Date <D 

Submitted by 

Submitted on 

Completed by 

Completed on 

Approved by 

Approved on 

CAP Resolved Date 

Number of findings 

Number of Resolved findings 

Percent resolved 

~Sa~;-] 

....--

0 

0 

0 

https://rsa.ed.gov/update.cfm ?rsaform=CA P&grant=H 126A 130052&quarter=8 7/24/2014 
Edit CAP 

Corrective Action Plan for Ohio Rehabilitation Services 

Commission 

Initial CAP - current status: Partially Saved 

View ~~~co~i~t~~nd ~~~~ to .J 

I>) Allow RichText editing I (Not recommended for JAWS users) 

Page I of2 

Tips for entering data: Enter dates in 'mm/dd/yyyy' 

dollars, do not use 

format. Enter numbers without commas. For 

do not en

a dollar sign before the number and round to the nearest dollar. For percentages, 

ter the percent sign. Enter 77.23% as 77.23, not as 0.7723. 

Finding Headline r 

I 

Finding 

t: 

A 

\ l 

r 

Mandated Corrective Action 

"" 

J, 

i .. _. 1 

I' 

r 

---··--

RSA Focus Area & .... 

Agency Planned Corrective Action Steps 

Corrective action 1.1 

1 Action: 

https://rsa.ed.gov/update.cfin?rsaform=CAP&grant=H 126A 130052&quarter=8 

7/24/2014 
Edit CAP 

, I 

I· 

Standard to be met and method 

of evaluation: 

Planned start date: CO I~ 

Actual start date: <D r . 

Projected completion date: (D 

Actual completion date: <D ~ 

I. iA state team comments: 

--· -----··--- Resolved? ... & 

Add Corrective ~:~ o~_] ')) Sav -J ~) Sa~:! ~ ope~ next finding 

I'- Add Finding J <D 

https://rsa.ed.gov/update.cfm?rsafonn=CAP&grant=H 126A 130052&quarter=8 

Page 2 of2 

7/24/2014
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1941 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1941

  To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 regarding reasonable 
                    break time for nursing mothers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 2013

Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney of New York (for herself, Ms. Moore, Mr. Levin, 
Mr. Rangel, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Cicilline, Ms. Lee of California, and Mr. 
   Conyers) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 regarding reasonable 
                    break time for nursing mothers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Supporting Working Moms Act of 
2013''.

SEC. 2. REASONABLE BREAK TIME FOR NURSING MOTHERS.

    Section 13(a) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 
213(a)) is amended by striking ``sections 6 (except section 6(d) in the 
case of paragraph (1) of this subsection) and 7'' and inserting 
``sections 6 and 7 (except sections 6(d) and 7(r) in the case of 
paragraph (1) of this subsection)''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1783.14 What are the eligibility criteria for RFP loan recipients? ( a ) A loan recipient must be an eligible entity as defined in § 1783.3.
( b ) The loan recipient must be unable to finance the proposed project from their own resources or through commercial credit at reasonable rates and terms.
( c ) The loan recipient must have or will obtain the legal authority necessary for owning, constructing, operating and maintaining the proposed service or facility, and for obtaining, giving security for, and repaying the proposed loan.
( d ) The project funded by the proceeds of an RFP loan must be located in, or the services provided as the result of such project must benefit, rural areas.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1955

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1955 appear at 80 FR 9895, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1955.19 [Reserved]
DISMISS and Opinion Filed December 19, 2018 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00628-CV 

IN THE INTEREST OF Z.M., A CHILD 

On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DF-17-12155 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Evans, and Justice Brown 

Opinion by Chief Justice Wright 

Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. After appellant failed to respond to our inquiry 

regarding the reporter’s record, we ordered the appeal submitted without a reporter’s record and 

appellant’s brief to be filed by November 1, 2018. By postcard dated November 5, 2018, we 

notified appellant the time for filing her brief had expired. We directed appellant to file a brief 

and an extension motion within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to file a brief and an 

extension motion would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, 

appellant has not filed a brief nor otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of 

this appeal. 

 
 –2– 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), (c).

180628F.P05 

 

/Carolyn Wright/ 

CAROLYN WRIGHT 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

IN THE INTEREST OF Z.M., A CHILD 

No. 05-18-00628-CV 

 On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. DF-17-12155. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. 

Justices Evans and Brown participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. 

Judgment entered December 19, 2018
§ 1738.54 Eligible service area exceptions for broadband facility upgrades. ( a ) Applicants upgrading existing broadband facilities in their existing service area are exempt from the requirement concerning the limit of incumbent service providers in § 1738.53(a)(3). Additionally, applicants for loans or loan guarantee funding that have received a broadband loan under Section 601 of the RE Act are exempt from the requirement concerning the number of households in § 1738.53(a)(2) without access to broadband service.
( b ) Applicants submitting one application to upgrade existing broadband facilities and to expand service beyond their existing service area must segregate the upgrade and expansion into two service areas, even if the upgrade and expansion areas are contiguous. The expansion service area will not be subject to any exemptions.
( c ) Applicants will be asked to remove areas determined to be ineligible from their proposed funded service area. The application will then be evaluated based on what remains if the resultant service territory is *de minimis* in change. Otherwise, the Applicant will be requested to provide additional information to the Agency relating to the ineligible areas, such as updated pro forma financials. If the Applicant fails to respond, the application may be returned.