Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 27 / Wednesday, February 10, 2010 / Notices 6705 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on December 18, 2008, based on a 

complaint filed by Eastman Kodak 

Company (‘‘Kodak’’) of Rochester, New 

York. 73 FR 77061 (Dec. 18, 2008). The 

complainant named the following 

respondents: Samsung Electronics Co., 

Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., 

Samsung Telecommunications America, 

LLC (collectively ‘‘Samsung’’), LG 

Electronics Inc., LG Electronics USA, 

Inc., and LG Electronics MobileComm 

USA, Inc. (collectively ‘‘LG’’). The 

complaint, as amended, alleged 

violations of section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the 

importation, sale for importation, and 

sale within the United States after 

importation of certain mobile 

telephones and wireless communication 

devices featuring digital cameras and 

components thereof that infringe certain 

claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,493,335 

(‘‘the ’335 patent’’) and 6,292,218 (‘‘the 

’218 patent’’). 

On December 16, 2009, Kodak and LG 

filed a joint motion before the 

administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) to 

terminate the investigation with respect 

to the LG respondents on the basis of a 

settlement agreement. The ALJ granted 

this motion on January 14, 2010. The 

Commission determined not to review 

the initial determination (‘‘ID’’). On 

December 17, 2009 the ALJ issued his 

final ID, finding that the Samsung 

respondents’ accused products infringe 

the asserted claims of both the ’335 

patent and the ’218 patent, that the 

asserted claims are not invalid, and that 

the ’218 patent is not unenforceable due 

to inequitable conduct. The Commission 

has stayed the deadline for filing any 

petitions for review of the final ID. 

On January 8, 2010, Kodak and 

Samsung (‘‘the parties’’) filed their joint 

motion to terminate the investigation 

with respect to the Samsung 

respondents on the basis of a settlement 

agreement. On January 20, 2010, the IA 

filed a response supporting the parties’ 

joint motion. Having examined the 

record of this investigation, the 

Commission has determined to grant 

Kodak and Samsung’s joint motion and 

terminate this investigation. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in 

section 210.21 of the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

210.21). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: February 2, 2010. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–2893 Filed 2–9–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Inv. No. 337–TA–702] 

In the Matter of: Certain Liquid Crystal 

Display Modules and Products 

Containing the Same, and Methods for 

Making the Same; Notice of 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Institution of investigation 

pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on 

January 8, 2010, under section 337 of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 

U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Sharp 

Corporation of Japan. The complaint 

alleges violations of section 337 based 

upon the importation into the United 

States, the sale for importation, and the 

sale within the United States after 

importation of certain liquid crystal 

display modules and products 

containing the same, and methods for 

making the same by reason of 

infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent Nos. 7,379,140; 6,141,075; 

7,283,192; 5,670,994; and 7,408,588. 

The complaint further alleges that an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by subsection (a)(2) of section 

337. 

The complainant requests that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue an 

exclusion order and a cease and desist 

order. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, is available for inspection 

during official business hours (8:45 a.m. 

to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the 

Secretary, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 

112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 

202–205–2000. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server at http:// 

www.usitc.gov. The public record for 

this investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Anne Goalwin, Esq., Office of Unfair 

Import Investigations, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, telephone (202) 

205–2574. 

Authority: The authority for 

institution of this investigation is 

contained in section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, and in section 

210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 

(2009). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

February 3, 2010, ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of liquid crystal display 

modules or products containing the 

same, or methods for making the same 

that infringe one or more of claims 1– 

3 of U.S. Patent No. 7,379,140; claims 

22, 23, 28–31, and 36–38 of U.S. Patent 

No. 6,141,075; claims 1 and 11 of U.S. 

Patent No. 7,283,192; claims 5, 6, 12, 13, 

and 15 of U.S. Patent No. 5,670,994; and 

claims 1, 3, 5, 29, and 32 of U.S. Patent 

No. 7,408,588, and whether an industry 

in the United States exists as required 

by subsection (a)(2) of section 337; 

(2) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainant is: 

Sharp Corporation, 22–22 Nagaike-cho, 

Abeno-ku, Osaka 545–8522, Japan. 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., 416 

maetan-dong, Youngtong-gu, Suwon, 

Kyunggi-Do, Korea 443–742. 

Samsung Electronics America, Inc., 105 

Challenger Road, Ridgefield Park, NJ 

07660. 

Samsung Semiconductor, Inc., 3655 

North First Street, San Jose, CA 

95134. 

(c) The Commission investigative 

attorney, party to this investigation, is 

Anne Goalwin, Esq., Office of Unfair 

Import Investigations, U.S. International 


sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES
6706 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 27 / Wednesday, February 10, 2010 / Notices 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

(3) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Honorable Paul J. Luckern, Chief 

Administrative Law Judge, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, shall 

designate the presiding Administrative 

Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a), 

such responses will be considered by 

the Commission if received not later 

than 20 days after the date of service by 

the Commission of the complaint and 

the notice of investigation. Extensions of 

time for submitting responses to the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation will not be granted unless 

good cause therefor is shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: February 3, 2010. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–2874 Filed 2–9–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–693] 

In the Matter of Certain Foldable 

Stools; Notice of Commission Decision 

Not To Review an Initial Determination 

Granting Complainant’s Motion To 

Amend the Complaint and Notice of 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) 

(Order No. 4) of the presiding 

administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) 

granting complainant’s motion to amend 

the complaint and notice of 

investigation in the above-captioned 

investigation. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–2310. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// 

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on December 9, 2009, based on a 

complaint filed by B & R Plastics, Inc. 

(‘‘B & R’’) of Denver, Colorado. 74 FR 

65155–6. The complaint alleges 

violations of section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 

**1337, in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

and the sale within the United States 

after importation of certain foldable 

stools by reason of infringement of U.S. 

Patent No. D460,566. The complaint 

further alleges the existence of a 

domestic industry. The Commission’s 

notice of investigation named several 

respondents including the following: 

abc Distributing Inc. (‘‘abc Distributing’’) 

of Bannockburn, Illinois; Crate & Barrel, 

Inc. (‘‘Crate & Barrel’’) of Northbrook, 

Illinois; and Home Depot Inc. (‘‘Home 

Depot’’) of Atlanta, Georgia. 

On January 5, 2010, B & R filed an 

unopposed motion to amend the 

complaint and notice of investigation to 

substitute proposed respondent Home 

Depot U.S.A. Inc. for named respondent 

Home Depot, and to correct the 

corporate names of respondents abc 

Distributing and Crate & Barrel with 

‘‘LTD Commodities, LLC, d/b/a abc 

Distributing’’ and ‘‘Euromarket Designs, 

Inc., d/b/a Crate & Barrel,’’ respectively. 

On January 19, 2010, the ALJ issued 

the subject ID granting B & R’s motion 

to amend the complaint and notice of 

investigation. No party petitioned for 

review of the ID pursuant to 19 CFR 

210.43(a). The Commission has 

determined not to review this ID. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in 

sections 210.14 and 210.42(h) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.14, 210.42(h). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: February 4, 2010. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–2894 Filed 2–9–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms 

and Explosives 

[OMB Number 1140–0004] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Proposed Collection; 

Comments Requested 

ACTION: 60-Day Notice of Information 

Collection Under Review: Interstate 

Firearms Shipment Report of Theft/ 

Loss. 

The Department of Justice (DOJ), 

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms 

and Explosives (ATF), will be 

submitting the following information 

collection request to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval in accordance with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

The proposed information collection is 

published to obtain comments from the 

public and affected agencies. Comments 

are encouraged and will be accepted for 

‘‘sixty days’’ until April 12, 2010. This 

process is conducted in accordance with 

5 CFR 1320.10. 

If you have comments especially on 

the estimated public burden or 

associated response time, suggestions, 

or need a copy of the proposed 

information collection instrument with 

instructions or additional information, 

please contact Ben Hayes, ATF National 

Tracing Center, 244 Needy Road, 

Martinsburg, WV 25401. 

Written comments and suggestions 

from the public and affected agencies 

concerning the proposed collection of 

information are encouraged. Your 

comments should address one or more 

of the following four points: 

—Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 


sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES