alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Section 906Certification**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), the undersigned officer of GuarantyBancorp (the “Company”) hereby certifies that the Company’s QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: April 30, 2009 |     |                                 |
|-----------------------|----------|--------------------------------------|
|                  |     |                                 |
|                  |     |                                 |
|                  |     | /s/   Paul  W. Taylor |
|                  |     | Name:                                | Paul  W. Taylor |
|                  | * * | Title:                               | *Chief  Financial and Operating Officer and Secretary* |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnishedsolely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18U.S.C. Section 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as aseparate disclosure document.

 

1

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of Personnel Management

          - [OMB Control No. 3206-0218; Form RI 94-7]

# AGENCY:

Office of Personnel Management.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a request for comments on a revised information collection. This information collection, “Death Benefit Payment Rollover Election” (OMB Control No. 3206-0218; Form RI 94-7), provides Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) surviving spouses and former spouses with the means to elect payment of FERS rollover-eligible benefits directly or to an Individual Retirement Arrangement.

Approximately 3,444 RI 94-7 forms will be completed annually. The form takes approximately 60 minutes to complete. The annual burden is 3,444 hours.

                        For copies of this proposal, contact Cyrus S. Benson on (202) 606-4808, FAX (202) 606-0910 or via E-mail to                         *Cyrus.Benson@opm.gov.*                         Please include a mailing address with your request.                    

# DATES:

Comments on this proposal should be received within 30 calendar days from the date of this publication.

# ADDRESSES:

Send or deliver comments to—

James K. Freiert (Acting), Deputy Associate Director, Retirement Operations, Retirement Services, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW., Room 3305, Washington, DC 20415-3500.

and

OPM Desk Officer, Office of Information & Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, 725 17th Street, NW., Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503.
      ( print page 70712)    
*For Information Regarding Administrative Coordination Contact:*                         Cyrus S. Benson, Team Leader, Publications Team, RS/RM/Administrative Services, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E  Street, NW., Room 4H28, Washington, DC 20415, (202) 606-4808.                    

John Berry,

Director, U.S. Office of Personnel Management.

[FR Doc. 2010-29050 Filed 11-17-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6325-38-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCTS

Case No. 3:19md2885

LIABILITY LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

Baker, 7:20cv39

Judge M. Casey Rodgers

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones

DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS ORDER NO. 3

This Order addresses Defendants’ objections and counter-designations to 

Plaintiff’s affirmative deposition designations and Plaintiff’s objections to 

Defendants’ counter-designations thereto for the following witness depositions:

1. Kieper, Ronald 12/20/2019

2. Knauer, Richard 12-17-2019

3. Madison, Ted 12-10-2019

SO ORDERED, on this 4th day of June, 2021.

M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 7:20-cv-00039-MCR-GRJ Document 147 Filed 06/04/21 Page 1 of 1
Nicor Inc.
                                                                       Form S-8
                                                                  Exhibit 23.01





INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement of
Nicor Inc. on Form S-8 of our reports dated February 28, 2003 (which report
expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph related
to the change in method of accounting for energy trading activities described in
the New Accounting Pronouncements -- Energy Trading Revenues note) and June 18,
2003, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Nicor Inc. for the year
ended December 31, 2002 and the Annual Report on Form 11-K of the Birdsall, Inc.
Retirement Savings Plan for the year ended December 31, 2002, respectively.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Chicago, Illinois

July 25, 2003
#### CHAMBERS, Respondent, v. BOYD, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 25, 1906.)

Action by Sidney C. Chambers against George B. Boyd, as executor, etc.

.No opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal denied, on payment of $10 costs, and leave given to appellant to apply to the court below to open his default. Order filed,
Editorial Note on Part 1924
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1924 appear at 80 FR 9870, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1924.8 Development work for modular/panelized housing units. ( a ) Exhibit B of this subpart applies to all loans involving modular/panelized housing units.
( b ) Complete drawings and specifications will be required as prescribed in exhibit C of this subpart. Each set of drawings will contain the design of the foundation system required for the soil and slope conditions of the particular site on which the modular/panelized house is to be placed.
( c ) The manufacturer will provide a certification (exhibit B, attachment 5 of this subpart), stating that the building has been built substantially in accordance with the drawings and specifications. The builder will also provide a certification that the onsite work complies with drawings, specifications, and the applicable development standard (eExhibit B, attachment 5 of this subpart).
( d ) Responsibility for field inspections will be in accordance with § 1924.9(a) of this subpart. Frequency and timing of inspections will be in accordance with § 1924.9(b) of this subpart, except that the Stage 2 inspection should be made during the time and in no case later than two working days after the crews commence work on the site and the house is being erected or placed on the foundation, to determine compliance with the accepted drawings and specifications.
( e ) Periodic plant inspections will be performed in accordance with paragraphs II and III of exhibit B of this subpart. Agency employees responsible for inspections in the area in which the manufacturing plant or material supply yard is located will perform such inspections as deemed necessary under paragraph III of exhibit B of this subpart. ( 1 ) Plant inspections will be made if the type construction method used could restrict adequate inspections on the building site.
( 2 ) Plant inspections will be made as often as necessary; however, after initial inspection and acceptance of the unit, only when it appears advisable to ascertain the performance and continuing stability of accepted materials and construction.
( f ) Only one contract will be accepted for the completed house on the site owned or to be bought by the borrower. The manufacturer of the house or the manufacturer's agent may be the prime contractor for delivery and erection of the house on the site or a builder may contract with the borrower for the complete house in place on the site. Such contracts should provide that payments will be made only for work in place on the borrower's site.
( g ) Payments for modular/panelized units will be made in accordance with the terms of the contract and in compliance with § 1924.6(a)(12) of this subpart.
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATIONS
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




I,
      William J. Worthen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
      Quarterly Report of Alsius Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
      ended September 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
      information contained in such quarterly report on Form 10-Q presents in all
      material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Alsius
      Corporation.




Date:
                November 14, 2007
            
            By:
            /s/
                  William J. WorthenName:
            William
                J. WorthenTitle:
            President
                and Chief Executive Officer






I,
      Brett
      L. Scott, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report
      of Alsius Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September
      30,
      2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such quarterly
      report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial
      condition and results of operations of Alsius Corporation




Date:
                November 14, 2007
            
            By:
            /s/
                  Brett L. ScottName:
            Brett
                L. ScottTitle:
            Chief
                Financial Officer





*A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to Alsius Corporation and will be retained by Alsius Corporation and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.*
###### Editorial Note on Part 1942

#### Editorial Notes:

Nomenclature changes to part 1942 appear at 80 FR 9878, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1942.133 Delegation and redelegation of authority.

Loan approval authority is in subpart A of part 1901 of this chapter. State Directors may delegate approval authority to District Directors to approve fire and rescue loans regardless of whether authority to approve other community facility loans is delegated. Except for loan approval authority, District Directors may redelegate their duties to qualified staff members.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7184
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TERRY JAMES STAFFORD, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior District Judge. (CR-93-119, CA-95-83-3-P) Submitted: March 21, 1996 Decided: April 2, 1996 Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terry James Stafford, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Crane Anderson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Stafford , Nos. CR-93-119; CA-95-83-3-P (W.D.N.C. June 21, 1995). We also deny Appellant's request for appointed counsel on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
From: Jones, Danielle [ mailto:Danielle_Y_Jones@omb.eop.gov ]

Sent: M onday, January 11, 2016 12:48 PM

To: Cogliano, Gerain < Cogliano.Gerain@epa.gov >

Subject: RMP RIA Comment from SBA

Gerain,

This rule is not certified

– but the Chapter 7 is not an IRFA

– presents the costs of the rule

– but no

alternatives, no alternative costs and no alternative discussion. Is there a separate IRFA, and if so can

we please see it.

Thanks,

Danielle

Danielle Y. Jones

Policy Analyst

Office of Management and Budget

Phone: (202) 395

- 1741 | djones@omb.eop.gov
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCTS

Case No. 3:19md2885

LIABILITY LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

McCombs, 7:20cv94

Judge M. Casey Rodgers

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones

DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS ORDER NO. 2

This Order addresses Defendants’ objections and counter-designations to 

Plaintiff’s affirmative deposition designations and Plaintiff’s objections to 

Defendants’ counter-designations thereto for the following witness depositions: 

1. Knauer, R. 2019-12-17

2. Ibrahim, A. 2020-09-23

3. Love, T. 2020-10-02

This Order also addresses the Plaintiffs’ objections and counter-designations 

to Defendants’ affirmative deposition designations and Defendants’ objections to 

Plaintiffs’ counter-designations thereto for the following witness depositions:

1. Battler, Leanne 

2. Ibrahim, Ahmed

3. Love, Tiundra

Case 7:20-cv-00094-MCR-GRJ Document 116 Filed 05/13/21 Page 1 of 3
Page 2 of 2

4. Merkley, John 

5. Murphy, William 

SO ORDERED, on this 13th day of May, 2021.

M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 7:20-cv-00094-MCR-GRJ Document 116 Filed 05/13/21 Page 2 of 3
DEFENDANTS’ AFFIRMATIVE 

DESIGNATIONS

Case 7:20-cv-00094-MCR-GRJ Document 116 Filed 05/13/21 Page 3 of 3
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1468.10 Environmental markets. ( a ) *Ecosystem services credits for conservation improvements under a wetland reserve easement.* Landowners may obtain environmental credits under other programs if one of the purposes of such program is the facilitation of additional conservation benefits that are consistent with the conservation purposes for which the easement was acquired, and such action does not adversely affect the rights or interests granted under the easement to the United States.
( b ) *Ecosystem services credits related to an agricultural land easement.* Landowners may obtain environmental credits under other programs if one of the purposes of such program is the facilitation of additional conservation benefits that are consistent with the conservation purposes for which the easement was acquired, and such action does not adversely affect the interests granted under the easement to the grantee or to the United States right of enforcement.
( c ) *Voluntary action.* ACEP funds may not be used to acquire easements to establish protections or to implement conservation practices that the landowner is required to establish as a result of a court order or to satisfy any mitigation requirement for which the ACEP landowner is otherwise responsible.
Exhibit 31.2**Certification of Principal Financial Officer**I, Keith R. Schroeder, certify that:1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Orchids Paper Products Company (the“Registrant”);2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.     The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:(a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)     [reserved](c)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(d)     Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5.     The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date:  August 26, 2005 /s/ Keith R. Schroeder   Keith R. Schroeder   Chief Financial Officer
Editorial Note on Part 1951
Editorial Notes: 1. Some of the exhibits referenced in this part 1951 are not published in the Code of Federal Regulations. Exhibits are available in any Rural Development office. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 1951 appear at 80 FR 9890-9894, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1951.264 Action when borrower fails to cooperate, respond or graduate. ( a ) When borrowers with other than FCP loans fail to: ( 1 ) Provide information following receipt of both FmHA Guide Letters 1951-1 and 1951-2 (available in any Agency office), or letters of similar format, they are in default of the terms of their security instruments. The approval official may, when appropriate, accelerate the account based on the borrower's failure to perform as required by this subpart and the loan and security instruments.
( 2 ) Apply for or accept other credit following receipt of both FmHA Guide Letters 1951- 5 and 1951-6 (available in any Agency office), or letters of similar format, they are in default under the graduation requirement of their security instruments. If the Agency determines the borrower is able to graduate, foreclosure action will be initiated in accordance with § 1955.15(d)(2)(ii). If the borrower's account is accelerated, the borrower may appeal the decision.
( b ) If an FCP borrower fails to cooperate after a lender expresses a willingness to consider refinancing the Agency loan, the account will be referred for legal action.
EXHIBIT 23.1

                         GERALD DUPONT ENTERPRISES, INC.
                               PETROLEUM ENGINEER
                                  P.O. BOX 1590
                          SUGAR LAND, TEXAS 77487-1590
                                     ------

                        (281) 240-2822 FAX (281) 242-2822


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS


            Gerald W. DuPont Enterprises, Inc. consents to the incorporation by
            reference of our evaluation of the estimated reserves and future net
            revenues of certain interests owned by Blue Dolphin Energy Company
            in the Galveston Block 288 Field, dated December 31, 1998, included
            in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Blue Dolphin Energy Company for
            the year ended December 31, 1998.



            /s/ GERALD W. DUPONT
            Petroleum Engineer


            MARCH 25, 1999
            Date