alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Pesticides in Public Supply Wells of the Central Columbia Plateau

By: Sarah J. Ryker**Alex K. Williamson

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/fs20596

#### Links

- More information:  **Publisher Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### §§ 1730.5-1730.19 [Reserved]
Editorial Note on Part 1924
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1924 appear at 80 FR 9870, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1924.106 Location. ( a ) *General.* It is RHS's policy to promote compact community development and to finance projects that avoid or minimize conversion of wetlands or important farmlands, avoid unwarranted alterations or encroachment on floodplains, and avoid unwarranted adverse effects to historic properties (including those listed or eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places), when practicable alternatives exist to meet development needs; RHS is prohibited from financing development within the Coastal Barrier Resource System, or on a barrier island. A complete listing of the environmental review requirements is found in 7 CFR part 1970. In order to be eligible for RHS participation: ( 1 ) The site must be located in an eligible area as defined in the program regulations under which the development is being funded or approved.
( 2 ) The site must comply with the environmental review requirements in accordance with 7 CFR part 1970.
( b ) *Single Family Housing.* In addition to the general requirements in paragraph (a) of this section, sites must provide a desirable, safe, functional, convenient, and attractive living environment for the residents.
( c ) *Multiple Family Housing.* Multiple family housing projects shall be located in accordance with the requirements in paragraph (r) of § 1944.215. Locating sites in less than desirable locations of the community because they are in close proximity to undesirable influences such as high activity railroad tracks; adjacent to or behind industrial sites; bordering sites or structures which are not decent, safe, or sanitary; or bordering sites which have potential environmental concerns such as processing plants, etc., is not acceptable. Screening such sites does not make them acceptable. Sites which are not an integral part of a residential community and do not have a reasonable access, either by location or terrain, to essential community facilities such as water, sewerage, schools, shopping, employment opportunities, medical facilities, etc., are not acceptable.
[60 FR 24543, May 9, 1995, as amended at 81 FR 11030, Mar. 2, 2016]
#### § 220.22 Information collection/recordkeeping—OMB assigned control numbers.

| 7 CFR section where requirements are described | Current OMB control No. |
| --- | --- |
| 220.3(e) | 0584-0067 |
| 220.7(a),(d), (e) | 0584-0012 |
| 220.8(a)(3), (o) | 0584-0012 |
| 220.9(a) | 0584-0012 |
| 220.11 (a)-(b) | 0584-0012 |
| 220.13 (a-1), (b), (c), (e), (f) | 0584-0012 0584-0594 |
| 220.14(d) | 0584-0012 |
| 220.15 | 0584-0012 |

[[81 FR 50194](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/81-FR-50194), July 29, 2016]
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsBOREAS HYD-3 Subcanopy Meteorological MeasurementsThe Boreal Ecosystem-Atmosphere Study (BOREAS) Hydrology (HYD)-3 team collected several data sets related to the hydrology of forested areas. This data set includes measurements of wind speed and direction; air temperature; relative humidity; and canopy, trunk, and snow surface temperatures within three forest types. The data were collected in the southern study area/Old Jack Pine (SSA-OJP) (1994), and SSA-OBS (Old Black Spruce), and SSA-OA (Old Aspen) (1996). Measurements were taken for three days in 1994 and four days at each site in 1996. These measurements were intended to be short term to allow the relationship between subcanopy measurements and those collected above the forest canopy to be determined. The subcanopy estimates of wind speed were used in a snow melt model to help predict the timing of snow ablation. The data are available in tabular ASCII files. The subcanopy meteorological measurement data are available from the Earth Observing System Data and Information System (EOSDIS) Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Distributed Active Archive Center (DAAC). The data files are available on a CD-ROM (see document number 20010000884).Document ID20000116504Acquisition SourceGoddard Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsHardy, Janet P.*(Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Lab. Hanover, NH United States)*Hall, Forrest G.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD United States)*Knapp, David E.*(Raytheon Information Technology and Scientific Services Greenbelt, MD United States)*Davis, Robert E.*(Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Lab. Hanover, NH United States)*Smith, David E.Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateJuly 1, 2000Subject CategoryEarth Resources And Remote SensingReport/Patent NumberRept-2000-03136-0/VOL23NASA/TM-2000-209891/VOL23NAS 1.15:209891/VOL23Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 462-33-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20000116504.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

 42

▲ ★

▲ ▲ ▲

★

▲ ▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

08/02

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 02 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.90 N 76.65 W Meters AGL
Editorial Note on Part 1940
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1940 appear at 80 FR 9876, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1940.591 Community Program Guaranteed loans. ( a ) *Amount available for allocations.* See § 1940.552(a) of this subpart.
( b ) *Basic formula criteria, data source and weight.* See § 1940.552(b) of this subpart. ( 1 ) The criteria used in the basic formula are: ( i ) State's percentage of national rural population—50 percent.
( ii ) State's percentage of national rural population with incomes below the poverty level—25 percent.
( iii ) State's percentage of national nonmetropolitan unemployment—25 percent.
( 2 ) The data source for the first criterion is the most recent decennial Census data. The data source for the second and third criteria is the 5-year data from the American Community Survey (ACS). Each criterion is assigned a specific weight according to its relevance in determining need. The percentage representing each criterion is multiplied by the weight factor and summed to arrive at a State factor (SF). The SF cannot exceed 0.05. Equation 1 to Paragraph (b) SF = (criterion (b)(1)(i) × 50 percent) + (criterion (b)(1)(ii) × 25 percent) + (criterion (b)(1)(iii) × 25 percent)
( c ) *Basic formula allocation.* See § 1940.552(c) of this subpart. States receiving administrative allocations do not receive formula allocations.
( d ) *Transition formula.* The transition formula for Community Program Guaranteed loans is not used.
( e ) *Base allocation.* See § 1940.552(e) of this subpart. States receiving administrative allocations do not receive base allocations.
( f ) *Administrative allocation.* See 1940.552(f) of this subpart. States participating in the formula base allocation procedures do not receive administrative allocations.
( g ) *Reserve.* See § 1940.522(g) of this subpart. States may request funds by forwarding a request following the format found in guide 26 of subpart A of part 1942 of this chapter to the National Office. Generally, a request for additional funds will not be honored unless the State has insufficient funds from the State's allocation to obligate the loan requested.
( h ) *Pooling of funds.* See § 1940.522(h) of this subpart. Funds are generally pooled at mid-year and year-end. Pooled funds will be placed in the National Office reserve and will be made available administratively.
( i ) *Availability of the allocation.* See § 1940.552(i) of this subpart. The allocation of funds is made available for States to obligate on an annual basis although the Office of Management and Budget apportions it to the Agency on a quarterly basis.
( j ) *Suballocation by State Director.* See § 1940.552(j) of this subpart. State Director has the option to suballocate to District Offices.
( k ) *Other documentation.* Not applicable.
[55 FR 11134, Mar. 27, 1990, as amended at 58 FR 54486, Oct. 22, 1993; 80 FR 9877, Feb. 24, 2015; 89 FR 34961, May 1, 2024]
**EXHIBIT 31.1****Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934**I, Mark R. Holden, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of American Barge Line Company; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosures controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over the financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.Date:August 11, 2005     /s/ Mark R. Holden     Mark R. Holden  President and Chief Executive Officer
#### § 249.22 Nonprocurement debarment/suspension, drug-free workplace, and lobbying restrictions.

The State agency must ensure compliance with the requirements of FNS' regulations governing nonprocurement debarment/suspension (2 CFR part 180, OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Government-wide Debarment and Suspension and USDA implementing regulations 2 CFR part 417) and drug-free workplace (2 CFR part 182, Government-wide Requirements for Drug-Free Workplace), as well as FNS' regulations governing restrictions on lobbying (2 CFR part 200, subpart E and USDA implementing regulations 2 CFR part 400, part 415, and part 418), where applicable.

[; 81 FR 66498, Sept. 28, 2016
Order filed April 15, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00086-CV

____________

THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS, Appellant

V.

STEPHEN P. ELORRIAGA, Appellee

On Appeal from the 246th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-55822

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due April 10, 2014. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 35.1. The court received notice that the appellant had not made payment 

arrangements for the record. Appellant notified this court that it has made a 

purchase request for payment of the court reporter and sent the request to the 

Office of the Attorney General. Because the reporter’s record has not been filed, 

we issue the following order.
We order Jeanine Redden, the official court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
#### COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. Thomas H. BRODHEAD and Elizabeth S. Brodhead, Respondents.

No. 13805.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

March 10, 1954.

H. Brian Holland, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ellis N. Slack, Lee A. Jackson, Joseph F. Goetten, Meyer Rothwacks, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., Charles W. Davis, Chief Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

Milton Cades, Smith, Wild, Beebe & Cades, J. Russell Cades, Eugene H. Beebe, Honolulu, Hawaii, for respondents.

Before MATHEWS, STEPHENS and BONE, Circuit Judges.

*653PER CURIAM.

The Commissioner of Internal Revenue seeks review of two decisions of the Tax Court — a decision redetermining the income tax liability of Thomas EL Brod-head and Elizabeth S. Brodhead for the calendar years 1943, 1944 and 1945 and a decision redetermining the income tax liability of Thomas H. Brodhead and Elizabeth S. Brodhead for the calendar year 1948. The decisions are affirmed on the grounds and for the reasons stated in the Tax Court’s findings and opinion, Brodhead v. Commissioner, 18 T.C. 726.
Form of Agreement for deferred stock unit award certificate



 Exhibit 10.27 
  

			
	 Deferred Stock Unit

Award Certificate
	  	 Denny’s Corporation
 ID: 13-3487402
 203 East Main Street
 Spartanburg, SC 29319

	
	(Participant Name)

  
 You have been awarded deferred stock
units under the Denny’s Corporation 2004 Omnibus Incentive Plan entitling you to receive shares of Denny’s Corporation $.01 par value common stock at a future time under the terms indicated below: 
  
 Effective Date of Award: 
  
 Number of Deferred Stock Units Awarded: 
  
 Payment Rate: 
  
 Payment Date: 
  
 Vesting Schedule:

  

  
 No right or interest in this award may be pledged, encumbered, or hypothecated to or in favor of any party other than Denny’s Corporation (the “Company’),
or shall be subject to any lien, obligation, or liability to any party other than the Company. This award is not assignable or transferable by you other than by will or the laws of descent and distribution. 
  
 This award is governed by the terms of the Denny’s Corporation 2004 Omnibus Incentive
Plan. 
  

  

							
	 	 	 	 	 
				
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 For Denny’s Corporation
	 	 	 	 	 	 Date
§ 1901.259 Actions to be taken when archeological properties are discovered during construction. ( a ) When properties of significant HA value are discovered during construction, the State Director will immediately consult with the applicant, the SHPO and the Regional Director of the National Park Service to determine whether there is sufficient factual evidence to warrant a decision to stop construction and undertake detailed survey and recovery.
( b ) When the consultations in paragraph (a) of this section result in a determination by the National Park Service to request the applicant to stop construction, such stop action should be taken so that the Park Service can initiate measures for immediate recovery within 60 days after notification of a discovery.
( c ) When the consultations in paragraph (a) of this section do not result in a determination by the National Park Service to stop construction and to undertake a survey and recovery, construction should be permitted to proceed with caution. In the event that the National Park Service determines that recovery is necessary, the FmHA or its successor agency under Public Law 103-354 applicant/borrower and the Park Service should determine that the consent of all persons, associations, or public entities having legal interests in the property involved has been secured. Also, the applicant should be informed that the Secretary of the Interior is authorized to compensate any person, association, or public entity damaged as a result of delay in construction or as a result of the temporary loss of the use of public or any nonfederally owned land.
( d ) No survey or recovery work will be required which in the determination of the State Director would seriously impede FmHA or its successor agency under Public Law 103-354 actions in providing assistance where the State Director determines that immediate action is required to avoid loss or damage of life or property. Nevertheless, appropriate measures will be taken to the extent practical to preserve, protect, or mitigate any damage to properties having HA significance.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1955

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1955 appear at 80 FR 9895, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1955.148 Auction sales.

This section provides guidance on the sale of all inventory property by auction, except FSA real property. Before an auction, the State Director, with the advice of the National Office for organizational property, will determine and document the minimum sale price acceptable. In determining a minimum sale price, the State Director will consider the length of time the property has been in inventory, previous marketing efforts, the type property involved, and potential purchasers. Program financing will be offered on sales of program and property. For NP property, credit may be offered to facilitate the sale. Credit, however, may not exceed the market value of the property nor may the term exceed the period for which the property will serve as adequate security. For program property sales, no preference will be given to program purchasers. The State Director will also consider whether an Agency employee will conduct an auction or whether the services of a professional auctioneer are necessary due to the complexity of the sale. When the services of a professional auctioneer are advisable, the services will be procured by contract in accordance with RD Instruction 2024-A (available in any Agency Office). Chattel property may be sold at public auction that is widely advertised and held on a regularly scheduled basis without solicitation. Form RD 1955-46 will be used for auction sales. At the auction, successful bidders will be required to make a bid deposit. For program and suitable property, the bid deposit will be the same as outlined in § 1955.130(e)(1) of this subpart. For NP property sales, a bid deposit of 10 percent is required. Deposits will be in the form of cashier's check, certified check, postal or bank money order or bank draft payable to the Agency, cash or personal checks may be accepted when deemed necessary for a successful auction by the person conducting the auction. Where credit sales are authorized, all notices and publicity should provide for a method of prior approval of credit and the credit limit for potential purchasers. This may include submission of letters of credit or financial statements prior to the auction. The auctioneer should not accept a bid which requests credit in excess of the market value. When the highest bid is lower than the minimum amount acceptable to the Agency, negotiations should be conducted with the highest bidder or in turn, the next highest bidder or other persons to obtain an executed bid at the predetermined minimum.

[62 FR 44404, Aug. 21, 1997, as amended at 68 FR 61332, Oct. 28, 2003]
Editorial Note on Part 1962
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1962 appear at 80 FR 9902, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1962.3 Authorities and responsibilities. ( a ) *Redelegation of authority.* Authority will be redelegated to the maximum extent possible consistent with program requirements and available resources. The State Director, District Director and County Supervisor are authorized to redelegate, in writing, any authority delegated to them in this subpart to any employee determined by them to be qualified.
( b ) *Responsibilities* — ( 1 ) *Rural Development personnel.* The State Director, District Director and County Supervisor are responsible for carrying out the policies and procedures in this subpart.
( 2 ) *Borrower.* The borrower is responsible for repaying the loans, maintaining, protecting, and accounting to Rural Development for all chattel security, and complying with all other requirements specified in promissory notes, security instruments, and related documents.
( c ) *Exception authority.* The Administrator may, in individual cases, make an exception to any requirement or provision of this subpart which is not inconsistent with the authorizing statute or other applicable law if the Administrator determines that application of the requirement or provision would adversely affect the Government's interest. The Administrator will exercise this auhority only at the request of the State Director and on the recommendation of the appropriate program Assistant Administrator. Requests for exceptions must be made in writing by the State Director and supported with documentation to explain the adverse effect on the Government's interest, propose alternative courses of action, and show how the adverse effect will be eliminated or minimized if the exception is granted.
( d ) *Farms in more than one jurisdiction.* If the farm is situated in more than one State, County, or Parish, the loan will be serviced by the County Office serving the County in which the borrower's residence is located. If the borrower is a corporation, cooperative, partnership or joint operation is the borrower's residence is not on the farm, the loan will be serviced by the County Office serving the County in which the farm or a major portion of the farm is located.
[50 FR 45783, Nov. 1, 1985, as amended at 51 FR 13480, Apr. 21, 1986]