IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00754-RPM-MEH

WILDEARTH GUARDIANS,

Plaintiff,

v.

LISA JACKSON, in her official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental

Protection Agency,

Defendant.

 

CONSENT DECREE

 

WHEREAS, on March 26, 2012, Plaintiff WildEarth Guardians filed its Complaint in this

action against Lisa Jackson, in her official capacity as Administrator of the United States

Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”);

 WHEREAS, Plaintiff alleges that EPA has failed to take action on a State

Implementation Plan (“SIP”) submission from the State of Utah within the time frame required

by section 110(k)(2) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7410(k)(2); 

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and Defendant have agreed to a settlement of this case without any

admission of any issue of fact or law, which they consider to be a just, fair, adequate and

equitable resolution of the claims raised in this action; and

WHEREAS, it is in the interest of the public, the parties and judicial economy to resolve

the issues in this action without protracted litigation.

NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as
2

follows: 

1. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over the claims set forth in the

Complaint and to order the relief contained in this Consent Decree.

2. Venue lies in the District of Colorado.

3. Plaintiff and Defendant shall not challenge the terms of this Consent Decree or

this Court’s jurisdiction to enter and enforce this Consent Decree. Upon entry, no party shall

challenge the terms of this Consent Decree. This Consent Decree constitutes a complete and

final resolution of all claims which have been asserted or which could have been asserted in the

Complaint.

4. This Consent Decree shall become effective upon the date of its entry by the

Court. If for any reason the Court does not enter this Consent Decree, the obligations set forth in

this Decree are null and void.

5. By February 14, 2013, EPA shall sign a notice of final action: to approve in

whole, or to approve in part and disapprove in part, or to disapprove in whole, the State of

Utah’s proposed SIP revision for maintenance of the 1997 eight-hour National Ambient Air

Quality Standard for ozone in Salt Lake and Davis Counties, which Utah submitted to EPA on

March 22, 2007. After signature, EPA shall promptly submit the notice for review and

publication to the Office of Federal Register.

6. The deadline in Paragraph 5 may be extended for a period of 60 days or less by

written stipulation executed by counsel for Plaintiff and Defendant and filed with the Court. 

Any other extension to the deadline in Paragraph 5 or any other modification to this Consent

Decree (excluding changes in counsel or addresses under Paragraph 17), may be approved by the
3

Court upon motion made pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by either party to this

Consent Decree and upon consideration of any response by the non-moving party and reply by

the moving party.

7. EPA agrees to settle Plaintiff’s claim for costs and attorneys’ fees by paying

$2,446.00 as soon as reasonably practicable after entry of this Consent Decree. This amount

shall be paid by Fed Wire Electronic Funds Transfer to WildEarth Guardians, pursuant to

payment instructions provided by Ashley Wilmes. Plaintiff agrees to provide counsel for

Defendant all necessary information for processing the electronic funds transfer within five (5)

business days of receipt of the Court’s order entering this Consent Decree. Plaintiff agrees to

accept payment of $2,446.00 in full satisfaction of any and all claims for costs and attorneys’

fees with respect to this case incurred up until the date of entry of this Consent Decree by the

Court. EPA does not concede that Plaintiff will be entitled to fees for any efforts after the date

of entry of this Consent Decree, and EPA reserves all defenses with respect to any such efforts

and any related fee claim. The fees paid under this Paragraph shall have no precedential value in

any future fee claim.

8. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to determine and effectuate 

compliance with this Consent Decree, to rule upon any motions filed in accordance with

Paragraph 6 of this Consent Decree, and to resolve any disputes in accordance with Paragraph 13

of this Consent Decree. Once EPA has taken the actions called for in Paragraphs 5 and 7 of this

Consent Decree, this Decree shall be terminated and the case dismissed with prejudice. The

Parties may either jointly notify the Court that the Decree should be terminated and the case

dismissed, or EPA may so notify the Court by motion. If EPA notifies the Court by motion, then
4

Plaintiff shall have twenty days in which to respond to such motion.

9. Except as provided herein, nothing in this Consent Decree shall be construed to

limit or modify any discretion accorded EPA by the Clean Air Act or by general principles of

administrative law in taking the actions which are the subject of this Consent Decree.

10. The parties agree and acknowledge that final approval and entry of this proposed

Consent Decree are subject to the requirements of Clean Air Act § 113(g), 42 U.S.C. § 7413(g). 

That subsection provides that notice of this proposed Decree be given to the public, that the

public shall have a reasonable opportunity to make any comments, and that the Administrator or

the Attorney General, as appropriate, must consider those comments in deciding whether to

consent to this Consent Decree. After lodging this Consent Decree with the Court, EPA shall

promptly submit a notice of availability of the Consent Decree for public comment to the Office

of Federal Register for review and publication. After this Consent Decree has undergone an

opportunity for notice and comment, the Administrator and/or the Attorney General, as

appropriate, shall promptly consider any such written comments in determining whether to

withdraw or withhold consent to this Consent Decree in accordance with section 113(g) of the

CAA. If the federal government elects not to withdraw or withhold consent to this Consent

Decree, Defendant or the parties shall promptly file a motion that requests the Court to enter this

Consent Decree.

11. Nothing in the terms of this Consent Decree shall be construed to waive any

remedies Plaintiff may have under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §

7607(b)(1), with respect to any future challenges to the final action called for in Paragraph 5.

12. Nothing in this Consent Decree shall be construed to provide this Court with
5

jurisdiction over any challenges by Plaintiff or any other person or entity not a party to this

litigation with respect to the final action called for in Paragraph 5. 

13. In the event of a dispute between the parties concerning the interpretation or

implementation of any aspect of this Consent Decree, the disputing party shall contact the other

party to confer and attempt to reach an agreement on the disputed issue. If the parties cannot

reach an agreed-upon resolution, then either party may move the Court to resolve the dispute. 

14. It is hereby expressly understood and agreed that this Consent Decree was jointly

drafted by Plaintiff and Defendant and that any and all rules of construction to the effect that

ambiguity is construed against the drafting party shall be inapplicable in any dispute concerning

the terms, meaning, or interpretation of this Consent Decree. This Consent Decree shall be

governed and construed under the laws of the United States.

15. The obligations imposed upon EPA under this Consent Decree may only be

undertaken using appropriated funds. No provision of this Decree shall be interpreted as or

constitute a commitment or requirement that EPA obligate funds in contravention of the AntiDeficiency Act, 31 U.S.C. § 1341, or any other applicable law or regulation.

16. The undersigned representative of each party certifies that she or he is

fully authorized to consent to the Court’s entry of the terms and conditions of this Consent

Decree.

17. Any written notices or other written communications between the parties

contemplated under this Consent Decree shall be sent to the undersigned counsel at the addresses

listed in the signature blocks below unless written notice of a change in counsel and/or address is

provided.
6

Respectfully submitted,

IGNACIA S. MORENO

Assistant Attorney General

Dated: 7/10/2012 s/David A. Carson 

DAVID A. CARSON

United States Department of Justice

Environment and Natural Resources 

Division

999 18th Street

South Terrace, Suite 370

Denver, Colorado 80202

(303) 844-1349

david.a.carson@usdoj.gov

COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT

Dated: 6/19/2012 s/Ashley D. Wilmes 

ASHLEY D. WILMES

WildEarth Guardians

827 Maxwell Avenue, Suite L

Boulder, Colorado 80304

(859) 312-4162

awilmes@wildearthguardians.org

s/James J. Tutchton 

JAMES J. TUTCHTON

WildEarth Guardians

6439 E. Maplewood Avenue

Centennial, Colorado 80111

(720) 301-3843

jtutchton@wildearthguardians.org

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF

Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court hereby finds that this Consent Decree is 

fair, reasonable, consistent with the Clean Air Act and in the public interest, and the Court 
7

hereby enters the Consent Decree.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: 

United States District Judge