alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 18 (Tuesday, January 28, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 4441]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-01489]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Massachusetts Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a planning meeting of 
the Massachusetts Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 
12:00 p.m. (EST) on Friday, February 20, 2014, at McCarter & English, 
located at 265 Franklin St., Boston, MA 02110. The purpose of the 
meeting is for the committee is to discuss its September briefing on 
the criminalization of school discipline, and to plan the next steps 
for its project on school disciplinary policies and if such policies 
have a disparate impact on students of color.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The 
comments must be received in the regional office by Thursday, March 20, 
2014. Comments may be mailed to the Eastern Regional Office, U.S. 
Commission on Civil Rights, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 1150, 
Washington, DC 20425, faxed to (202) 376-7548, or emailed to Barbara de 
La Viez at ero@usccr.gov. Persons who desire additional information may 
contact the Eastern Regional Office at 202-376-7533.
    Persons needing accessibility services should contact the Eastern 
Regional Office at least 10 working days before the scheduled date of 
the meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Eastern Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, 
www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Eastern Regional Office at the above 
phone number, email or street address.
    The meetings will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated: January 22, 2013.
David Mussatt,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2014-01489 Filed 1-27-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

JUNE 3, 2010

JOHN LEY

 CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 09-15529

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 06-60317-CR-WPD

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

YVETTE SCOTT PATTERSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________

(June 3, 2010)

Before BIRCH, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
Randee J. Golder, appointed counsel for Yvette Scott Patterson in this direct

criminal appeal, moves to withdraw from further representation of Patterson.

Golder has filed a brief arguing that the appeal lacks merit, in accordance with

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). Patterson also filed a

brief with this Court asking for a reduction in sentence. After independent review

of the entire record, we agree with Golder that the appeal lacks merit.

Patterson pleaded guilty to Counts 1 and 23 of the 47 counts charged in the

indictment in exchange for dismissal of the remaining counts. During the plea

colloquy, the district court questioned Patterson to ensure that the plea was entered

knowingly and voluntarily, in compliance with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure

11(b)(1). Although there were some technical defects in the colloquy, the “core

concerns” that Patterson was choosing to plead voluntarily, that she understood the

nature of the charges, and that she understood the consequences of her plea, were

adequately addressed. See United States v. Monroe, 353 F.3d 1346, 1354 (11th

Cir. 2003). We conclude that Patterson knowingly and voluntarily entered into the

plea agreement.

The plea agreement contained a provision waiving Patterson’s right to

appeal her sentence. The district court specifically questioned Patterson about the

waiver, and we are satisfied that Patterson understood the significance of the right

2
she was waiving and that she waived it voluntarily. We conclude that the waiver is

enforceable. See United States v. Bushert, 997 F.2d 1343, 1350–51 (11th Cir.

1993).

Although Patterson waived her right to appeal her sentence, we mention that

the district court followed the government’s recommendation and sentenced her

below the United States Sentencing Guidelines range for her offenses. The

guidelines range for Count 1, combined with the mandatory, consecutive term for

Count 23, placed Patterson’s recommended imprisonment range at 94 to 108

months. She received a sentence of 70 months imprisonment.

Our independent review of the record reveals no arguable issues of merit.

Golder’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Patterson’s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.

3
directors' life insurance program




EXHIBIT 10.3




Directors’
Life Insurance Program




Every
Director upon becoming a Director of Citizens Financial Services, Inc. receives
$50,000 in life insurance as part of our group plan.
Huntingdon Life Sciences 00-6127 Page 1077

211-EtOH-S Final Report

 Animal Exposure and Animal Data 

Preface Appendix 3 

INTRODUCTION: The following is data generated at Huntingdon Life Sciences, East 

Millstone, NJ. The separately issued main study report should be referenced for details 

of the procedures used for test atmosphere generation/characterization and animal 

evaluations.

STUDY DATES: Date of Animal Receipt: 5 April 2001 

 Experimental Initiation Date: 19 April 2001 (in-life) 

 Experimental Completion Date: 17 May 2001 (in-life) 

EXPOSURES AND IN-LIFE SUMMARY: The actual measured results during the 

exposures were comparable to the targeted exposure levels. There were no exposurerelated effects seen in the test animals with regards to body weights and feed 

consumption.

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

TABLES 

A. Chamber Monitoring Results...................................................................................1078 

B. Summary of Clinical Observations (pretest only) ...................................................1086 

C. Mean Body Weights (grams)...................................................................................1088 

D. Mean Body Weight Change (grams) .......................................................................1090 

E. Mean Feed Consumption Values (grams/kg/day) ...................................................1092 

F. Individual Clinical Observations (pretest only).......................................................1094 

G. Individual Body Weights (grams)............................................................................1104 

H. Individual Body Weight Change (grams)................................................................1114 

I. Individual Feed Consumption Values (grams/kg/day) ............................................1124 

J. Animal Termination History....................................................................................1134
Docket No: FAA - 2015 - 2966 Dir ID: 2015 - NM - 051 - AD
#### § 1221.230 FSA State office report.

Each FSA State office shall transmit to the Administrator, FSA, as soon as possible, but in no event later than the 20th business day following the final day of the voting period, a report summarizing the data contained in each of the reports from the county FSA offices. One copy of the State summary shall be filed for a period of not less than 12 months after the results have been released and available for public inspection after the results have been released.
2006-0151.

#### State v. Carswell.

Warren App. No. CA2005-04-047, 2005-Ohio-6547.

Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.
Amendment One to Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.9 (a) 
  
 AMENDMENT ONE 
 TO 
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
  
 Effective January 1, 2003, this AMENDMENT ONE TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT by and
between Anthem Insurance Companies, Inc., an Indiana insurance company (the “Company”), and Mark L. Boxer (the “Executive”) hereby amends the EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) between the parties dated as of the
13th day of November, 2000, as follows: 
  

	1.	Section 2 of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the termination date and inserting in place thereof the 31st day of December, 2004. 

  

	2.	The first paragraph of Section 11 of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the provision “one (1) year” and inserting in place thereof “eighteen (18)
months.” 

  

	3.	Section 16(b) of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the provision “one (1) year” and inserting in place thereof “eighteen (18) months.”


  

	4.	All other provisions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 

  

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Executive have duly executed this AMENDMENT ONE TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT effective as of the day and year first above written.

  

									
	Mark L. Boxer	 	 	 	Anthem Insurance Companies, Inc.
				
	 /s/ Mark L. Boxer
	 	 	 	 By:
	 	 /s/ Larry C. Glasscock

					
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 Name:
	 	Larry C. Glasscock
					
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 Title:
	 	President and CEO
Editorial Note on Part 1948
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1948 appear at 80 FR 9888, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1948.98 Grant agreements. The following Grant Agreements are a part of this regulation. ( a ) Exhibit A of this subpart is a Grant Agreement for Growth Management and Housing Planning Grants for approved Designated Energy Impacted Areas.
( b ) Exhibit B of this subpart is a Grant Agreement for Site Development and/or Site Acquisition for Housing and/or Public Facilities and/or Services.
Exhibit 32.1**Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906**In connection with the quarterly report of Orchids Paper Products Company (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael P. Sage, Chief Executive Officer and President of theCompany, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and Section 1350 ofChapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     /s/ Michael P. Sage     Michael P. Sage  Chief Executive Officer and President  May 11, 2006
24
###### Editorial Note on Part 1980

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1980 appear at 80 FR 9905, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1980.1001 Purpose.

Projects that support the implementation of Strategic Community Investment Plans may receive priority funding from authorized programs found in § 1980.1002. The purpose of this subpart is to describe the process by which applications will be reviewed and selected to receive priority funding.

[85 FR 59393, Sept. 22, 2020]
§ 1767.12 Accounting system requirements. ( a ) Each Rural Development electric borrower must maintain and keep its books of accounts and all other books and records that support the entries in such books of accounts in accordance with §§ 1767.13-1767.31.
( b ) Each RUS electric borrower shall maintain and keep its books of accounts and all other books and records which support the entries in such books of accounts in accordance with § 1767.41, Accounting Methods and Procedures Required of All RUS Borrowers, herein, which prescribes accounting principles to be applied to specific factual circumstances.
[58 FR 59825, Nov. 10, 1993, as amended at 73 FR 30280, May 27, 2008]
#### Anna Homburger, Respondent, v Max Geschwind, Appellant.

a malpractice action, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated January 7, 1980, which (1) denied his motion to dismiss the action for failure to serve a complaint, and (2) granted plaintiff’s cross motion to require him to accept the complaint. Order reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, defendant’s motion to dismiss the action is granted and plaintiff’s cross motion is denied. In opposing defendant’s dismissal motion brought pursuant to CPLR 3012 (subd [b]), plaintiff failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the delay and to establish the legal merit of her claim through evidentiary facts attested to by individuals with personal knowledge. Consequently, the denial of defendant’s motion was an abuse of discretion *(Barasch v Micucci,*49 NY2d 594). Gulotta, J. P., Cohalan, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Notes:

1. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 83 FR 22178, May 14, 2018.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 83 FR 61310, Nov. 29, 2018

3. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 85 FR 65504, Oct. 15, 2020.

4. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 87 FR 44266, July 26, 2022.

#### §§ 2.700-2.701 [Reserved]
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch on Law Enforcement Responses to Opioid Overdoses (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Host a College Signing Day Celebration      

# Host a College Signing Day Celebration

First Lady Michelle Obama invites school and community leaders to promote the students’ success by hosting a College Signing Day at local high schools. Use the College Signing Day Toolkit (PDF, 22 pages) to plan an event to honor students’ commitments to complete their education beyond high school. 

https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/may_1st_signing_day_kit_for_the_public_0.pdf?utm_source=FindYouthInfo.gov&utm_medium=Federal-Links&utm_campaign=Reports-and-Resources
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
of Candela Corporation on Form S-3 (File No. 33-46056) and on Form S-8 (File
Nos. 33-18932, 33-29291, 33-35091, 33-37696, 33-37697, 33-37698, 33-55596,
and 33-73040) of Candela Corporation of our report dated August 23, 1999
relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which
appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
September 28, 2000
#### § 1785.67 Definitions.

*Accumulated (deferred) interest* means interest allowed to accumulate up to, and including, the basis date of RUS notes covering loans approved before June 5, 1957. The accumulated interest is payable in equal periodic installments over the remaining life of the notes.

*Act* means the Rural Electrification Act of 1936, as amended (7 U.S.C. 901 *et seq.*).

*Advance payment* means a voluntary unscheduled payment on an RUS note, made prior to October 2, 1987, credited to the advance payment account of a borrower.

*Cushion of Credit Payment* means a voluntary unscheduled payment on an RUS note made after October 1, 1987, credited to the cushion of credit account of a borrower.

*Current interest* means interest payable periodically as it accrues.

*Fund* means the Rural Electrification and Telephone Revolving Fund established pursuant to the Act.

*Interest credit* means interest earned on balances in advance payment or cushion of credit accounts. Since the periodic installments are established by the terms of the notes, the interest credits cannot serve to change the total amount of each installment; therefore, an amount equal to the interest credits is added to the principal installment due. On receipt of the full installments, amounts equal to the interest credits (the principal offsets) are added to the respective advance payment accounts.

*Prepayment* means a voluntary unscheduled payment which the borrower instructs RUS to apply directly and immediately to the principal of an RUS note.

*RUS notes* means those notes, bonds, or other obligations evidencing indebtedness created by loans made by RUS pursuant to titles I, II, or III of the Act.

*Subaccount* means the *Rural Economic Development Subaccount* established pursuant to the Act as part of the Fund.
#### Howard F. Zoarski *v.*Barbara B. Zoarski

House, C. J., Cotter, Thim, Shapiro and Loiselle, Js.

Argued November 3

decided November 5, 1971

*Nathan A. Besnik,*for the appellant (plaintiff).

*Harold B. Yudkin,*for the appellee (defendant).

Pee Cueiam.

This appeal is from a judgment for the defendant on the plaintiff’s complaint and on the defendant’s cross complaint, each seeking a divorce on the ground of intolerable cruelty. We find no error in the evidential rulings of the state referee who tried the case sitting as a court. The finding of facts, which is not subject to material correction, fully supports the conclusions of the court.

There is no error.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: December 29, 2005
    
    /s/ Paul A. KrugerPaul A Kruger, Chief Executive OfficerDate: December 29, 2005
    
    /s/ Brian CarterBrian Carter, Chief Financial Officer
#### § 215.14 Nondiscrimination.

The Department's regulations on nondiscrimination in federally assisted programs are set forth in part 15 of this title. The Department's agreements with State agencies, the State agencies' agreements with School Food Authorities and child-care institutions and the FNSRO agreements with School Food Authorities administering nonprofit private schools and with child-care institutions shall contain the assurances required by such regulations. When different types of milk are served to children, (a) a uniform price for each type of milk served shall be charged to all non-needy children in the school or child-care institution who purchase milk, and (b) needy children shall be given the opportunity to select any type of milk offered.

(44 U.S.C. 3506)

[Amdt. 13, 39 FR 28418, Aug. 7, 1974, as amended at 47 FR 745, Jan. 7, 1982]
# 506th 

# Judicial District Court
Albert M. McCaig, Jr., Judge
www.Court506.com

May 5, 2015
Court ofCriminal Appeals P.O. Box 12308 Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711 

## Ab81**~~costa,**

## Clerk

Re: Writs Number 08-09-12976D through 08-09-12986D Criminal Trial CourtNumber 08-09-12976 ExParte William Andrew Allen Clerk: Court Coordinator Susie Schubert CourtReporter Robyn S. Wiley

Grimes County Waller County 836 Austin Street, Suite 307

Hempstead, Texas 77445 Fax: 979.826.9149 Ofc: 979.921.0921

I am thetrial courtjudgeinthereferencedmatter. The cases were originally heard by the 155th Judicial DistrictCourt. By Legislative act (Section 24.254, Government Code), effective January 1, 2014, the 506th Judicial District Courttook over all cases pending inthe 155th Judicial District Court. The Applicant, Mr. William AndrewAllen, has made numerous filings with the trial court pertaining to his 11.07 Writ applications, many of which have had to do with his contention that the 506th court does not have jurisdiction ofhis cases. I have personally written to inform Mr. Allen ofthe effect ofthe change ofcourts. · Mr. Allen's frequent and continuous supplementation and filings has required both this court and the Waller County District Clerk, to provide eleven separate supplements to the several 11.07 Applications each time Mr. Allen files new allegations. This has become labor and resource intensive, consumes valuable time, and, to date, does not appear to have provided any substantial new information to your court. · I am requesting the Honorable Texas Court of Criminal Appeals to declare Mr. WilliamAndrewAllen a vexatious litigant, andto deny him further access to the courts until his current applications for 11.07 reliefhave been ruled on by your court.



### AMMI c: Waller County District Clerk Mr. William Andrew Allen

# M!:~cC · Judge, Presiding

Mr. Elton Mathis, Waller County District Attorney
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7100

WILLIAM ALLEN LEGG, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ARCHIE C. GEE, Warden; ASSISTANT WARDENSPANGLER; PATUXENT STAFF; DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; EMSA STAFF; MARYLAND HEALTH AND HYGIENE DEPARTMENT OF MARYLAND, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA98-975-DKC) Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 6, 1999 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Allen Legg, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:William Allen Legg filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of appeal are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions have thirty days within which to file in the district court notices of appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The only exceptions to the appeal period are when the district court extends the time to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). The district court entered its order on April 15, 1998; Legg’s notice of appeal was filed on July 23, 1998, which is beyond the thirty-day period. Legg’s failure to note a timely appeal or obtainan extension of the appeal period leaves this court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of his appeal. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED