alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 1951
Editorial Notes: 1. Some of the exhibits referenced in this part 1951 are not published in the Code of Federal Regulations. Exhibits are available in any Rural Development office. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 1951 appear at 80 FR 9890-9894, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1951.203 Definitions. ( a ) *Approval official.* An official who has been delegated loan and/or grant approval authorities within applicable programs.
( b ) *Assumption of debt.* The agreement by one party to legally bind itself to pay the debt incurred by another.
( c ) *CONACT.* The Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act, as amended.
( d ) *Eligible applicant.* An entity that would be legally qualified for financial assistance under the loan or grant program involved in the servicing action.
( e ) *Ineligible applicant.* An entity or individual that would not be considered eligible for financial assistance under the loan or grant program involved in the servicing action.
( f ) *Nonprogram (NP) loan.* An NP loan exists when credit is extended to an ineligible applicant and/or transferee in connection with loan assumptions or sale of inventory property; any recipient in cases of unauthorized assistance; or a recipient whose legal organization has changed as set forth in § 1951.220(e) of this subpart resulting in the borrower being ineligible for program benefits.
( g ) *Servicing office.* The State, District, or County Office responsible for immediate servicing functions for the borrower or grantee.
( h ) *Transfer fee.* A one-time nonrefundable application fee, charged to ineligible applicants for Rural Development services rendered in the processing of a transfer and assumption.
[55 FR 4399, Feb. 8, 1990, as amended at 69 FR 70884, Dec. 8, 2004]
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

EXHIBIT 10.15    
    


 
 

AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT    
    


        THIS AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of March 11, 2005, by and between UbiquiTel Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and Patricia E.
Knese, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of the Company ("Executive"), and amends an Employment Agreement between the parties entered into and effective as of November 19,
2003 ("Employment Agreement"). 


        The
parties agree as follows: 


        1.     Section 1.a.(2)(B)
of the Employment Agreement is amended by adding the words ", and notwithstanding anything to the contrary in any Incentive Stock Option
Agreement or Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement with the Company executed hereafter that grants incentive or nonqualified stock options to Executive," after the words "each as may be amended from
time to time" and before the words "any unexercised portion of the Options". As amended, Section 1.a.(2)(B) will read as follows (amended language underscored): 



        (B)  Notwithstanding
anything to the contrary in Section 5 of Executive's Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement with the Company dated as of November 20, 2000, as
amended, Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement with the Company dated as of May 2, 2002 and Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement with the Company dated as of August 7, 2003, each as may be
amended from time to time, and notwithstanding anything to the contrary in any Incentive Stock Option Agreement or Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement with the Company executed hereafter that grants
incentive or nonqualified stock options to Executive, any unexercised portion of the Options (as defined therein) shall automatically and without notice terminate and become null and void on the date
that is the earlier of (I) three (3) years following the date on which Executive's employment with the Company or a successor-in-interest of the Company is
terminated or (II) the date set forth in Section 5(f) of the applicable Stock Option Agreement. 




        2.     In
all other respects the parties reaffirm the Employment Agreement without change. 


        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date and year first above written. 



	

 	
 	

UBIQUITEL INC.
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	


	 	 	Its:	 	President and Chief Executive Officer
	

 	
 	

EXECUTIVE:
	

 	
 	

By:	
 	

 Patricia E. Knese















QuickLinks



EXHIBIT 10.15


AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
##### 



Exhibit 32.01
 Certification by the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  /s/ Seth Halio

Seth HalioExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate: December 8, 2006
 Certification by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  /s/ Michael Mendes

Michael MendesPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate: December 8, 2006
 These certifications accompany this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed
filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into
any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent
that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
 24
§ 1721.105 Application documents. ( a ) *Deferments for financial hardship.* A Borrower requesting a section 12 deferment because of financial hardship must submit the following: ( 1 ) A summary of the financial position of the Borrower, based on the latest information available (usually less than 60 days old).
( 2 ) A copy of the board resolution requesting an extension due to financial hardship.
( 3 ) A 10-year financial forecast of revenues and expenses on a cash basis, by year, for the period of the extension and 5 years beyond to establish that the remaining payments can be made as rescheduled.
( 4 ) A listing of notes or portions of notes to be extended, the effective date for the beginning of the extension, and the length of the extension.
( 5 ) A narrative description of the nature and cause of the hardship and the strategy that will be instituted to mitigate or eliminate the effects of the hardship.
( b ) *Deferments for energy resource conservation loans.* A Borrower requesting principle deferments for an ERC loan program must submit a letter from the Borrower's General Manager requesting an extension of principle payments for the purpose of offering an ERC loan program to its members and describing the details of the program.
( c ) *Deferments for renewable energy projects.* A Borrower requesting principle deferments for its renewable energy project must submit a letter from the Borrower's General Manager requesting an extension of principle payments for the purpose of offering an ERC loan program to its members and describing the details of the program.
( d ) *Deferments for distributed generation projects.* A Borrower requesting principle deferments for distributed generation projects must submit a letter from the Borrower's General Manager requesting an extension of principle payments for the purpose of offering an ERC loan program to its members and describing the details of the program and approval is also subject to any applicable terms and conditions of the Borrower's loan contract, mortgage, or indenture.
( e ) *Deferments for contribution-in-aid of construction.* A Borrower requesting principle deferments for contribution-in-aid of construction must submit the following: ( 1 ) A letter from the Borrower's General Manager requesting an extension of principle payments for the purpose of offering an ERC loan program to its members and describing the details of the program.
( 2 ) A summary of the calculations used to determine the average cost per residential customer. (See § 1721.104(e)(2)).
[67 FR 485, Jan. 4, 2002, as amended at 68 FR 37954, June 26, 2003; 84 FR 32616, July 9, 2019]
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 16, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69922-69926]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28768]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Transmittal Nos. 10-50]


36(b)(1) Arms Sales Notification

AGENCY: Defense Security Cooperation Agency, Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text 
of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to 
fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 
July 1996.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 
601-3740.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a copy of a letter to the 
Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittals 10-50 with 
attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of 
Technology.

    Dated: November 9, 2010.
Morgan F. Park,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P

[[Page 69923]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16NO10.041


[[Page 69924]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16NO10.042


[[Page 69925]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16NO10.043


[[Page 69926]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN16NO10.044

[FR Doc. 2010-28768 Filed 11-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1886 

To prohibit land border crossing fees. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2013 

Ms. DELBENE (for herself, Mr. HANNA, Mr. OWENS, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. HIGGINS, and Mr. HUIZENGA of Michigan) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition 

to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently 

determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To prohibit land border crossing fees. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Promoting Border 

5 Commerce and Travel Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON LAND BORDER CROSSING FEES. 

7 The Secretary of Homeland Security may not estab8 lish, collect, or otherwise impose a border crossing fee for 

9 pedestrians or passenger vehicles at land ports of entry 

10 along the southern border or the northern border of the 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1886 IH

1 United States, and may not conduct any study relating 

2 to the imposition of such a fee. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


     We have issued our reports dated May 5, 1997, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of Kent
Electronics Corporation and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended March
29, 1997.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said
reports in the Registration Statements of Kent Electronics Corporation on Form
S-3, File Nos. 33-59108, 333-20265 and 33-48434, and Form S-8, File Nos. 33-
12028, 33-17821, 33-18527, 33-66030, and 333-20367.



GRANT THORNTON L.L.P.


Houston, Texas
June 26, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  39,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   25,000
<INVENTORY>                                    154,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               211,000
<PP&E>                                         919,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 97,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,001,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,321,000
<BONDS>                                        516,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       28,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     (982,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,001,000
<SALES>                                        2,503,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,503,000
<CGS>                                          1,722,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2,167,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             163,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,549,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,547,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,547,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.06)



</TABLE>
January 10, 1974 

The Honorable Anna Beth Merten 

County Auditor 

Wailer County 

P. 0. Box 966 

Hempstead, Texas 77445 

Opinion No. H- 205 

Re: Disposition of funds 

raised by a non-profit 

corporation in connection 

with county centennial 

Dear Ms. Merten: celebration 

Your request for our opinion involves funds derived from the sale of 

a book on the history of Walter County and a Wailer County Centennial 

Cookbook. You advise that the Wailer County Historical Survey Committee, 

created in accordance with Article 6145.1, V. T. C. S., has been inactive, 

in other than civic duties, until this year. Since 1973 was the Wailer County 

Centennial Year, the Committee decided that it was an opportune time to 

write and have published the history of Wailer County and also a Walter 

County Centennial Cookbook. 

Wailer County Historical Society, Inc., a non-profit corporation, 

was formed and it financed the history book and the cookbook for the Historical Survey Committee. After selling the books and paying expenses, a 

profit remained. 

The question you have asked is: “Should the profit from the sale of the 

above mentioned books be deposited with the Wailer County Treasurer to be 

disbursed by her and audited by the County Auditor, as other county funds? ” 

The Texas Non-Profit Corporation Act, Article 1396-1.01, et s.eq. , 

V. T. C. S., authorizes the organization of such a corporation for any lawful 

purpose. (Art. 1396-Z. 01). Among its general powers, it is expressly authorized “To make donations for the public welfare or for charitable, scientific, 

or educational purposes. . . . ” [Art. 1396-2.02, A(l3)]. It is not prohibited 

from realizing a profit but may not pay any dividend t.o its members, directors 

p. 964 
The Honorable Anna Beth Merten, page 2 (H-205) 

or officers. (Art. 1396-Z. 24). 

It is our opinion, therefore, that the funds of the Wailer County 

Historical Society, Inc., may be used or disposed of by it for any purpose 

not forbidden by the Non-Profit Corporation Act. The corporation is 

not subject to the supervision of the County Auditor’s office and may 

deposit its funds in any proper depository or none at all. 

SUMMARY 

Neither the county treasurer nor the county 

auditor has any responsibility for funds of a legally 

organized non-profit corporation. 

Very truly yours, 

JOHN L. HILL 

Attorney General of Texas 

DAVID M. KENDALL, Chairman 

Opinion Committee 

p. 965
###### Editorial Note on Part 1924

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1924 appear at 80 FR 9870, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1924.49 State supplements.

State Supplements or policies will not be issued or adopted to either supplement or set requirements different from those of this subpart, unless specifically authorized in this subpart, without prior written approval of the National Office.
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

I,
Barney A. Richmond, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my
knowledge, the Quarterly Report of SEI Holdings, Inc. on
Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2008, (i) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) that the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SEI
Holdings, Inc.



|                        |  |                              
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Date:
September 4, 2012 |  | /S/    BARNEY
A.
RICHMOND    
|                        |  | Barney A. Richmond           
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                        |  | (Principal Executive Officer)

I, Richard C. Turner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my
knowledge, the Quarterly Report of SEI Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended
August 31, 2008, (i) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) that the information
contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of SEI Holdings, Inc.



|                        |  |                              
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Date:
September 4, 2012 |  | /S/    RICHARD
C.
TURNER     
|                        |  | Richard C. Turner            
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|                        |  | (Principal Financial Officer)
2006-0580.

#### State v. Saddler.

Cuyahoga App. No. 85550, 2005-Ohio-6026. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.
#### § 1783.11 What is the revolving loan fund?

The grant recipient shall establish and maintain a revolving loan fund for the purposes set forth in § 1783.12. The revolving loan fund shall be comprised of revolving loan fund grant funds and the grant recipient's contributed funds. All revolving loan fund loans made to loan recipients shall be drawn from the revolving loan fund. All revolving loan fund loans shall be serviced and the revolving loan fund maintained, in accordance with this part and applicable law.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7599

ISIAH JAMES, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

P. DOUGLAS TAYLOR, Warden; MICHAEL MOORE,

Director; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF

SOUTH CAROLINA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-98-742-0-13BD)

Submitted: January 21, 1999 Decided: February 9, 1999

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Isiah James, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief

Deputy Attorney General, Lauri J. Soles, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY

GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Isiah James, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders (1) denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition, which the

district court properly construed as a petition under 28 U.S.C.A.

§ 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998), and (2) denying his motion filed

under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record, the

district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the

magistrate judge to deny relief on the underlying petition, and the

court’s opinion denying James’ Rule 59(e) motion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. See James v. Taylor, No. CA-98-742-0-13BD (D.S.C. Aug. 18

& Sept. 29, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
Editorial Note on Part 1955
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1955 appear at 80 FR 9895, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1955.4 Redelegation of authority. Authorities will be redelegated to the extent possible, consistent with program requirements and available resources. ( a ) Except as provided in § 1900.6(c) of this chapter, any authority in this subpart which is specifically delegated to the Administrator or to an Deputy Administrator may only be delegated to a State Director. The State Director cannot redelegate such authority.
( b ) Except as provided in paragraph (a) of this section, the State Director is authorized to redelegate, in writing, any authority delegated to the State Director in this subpart to a Program Chief, Program Specialist or Property Management Specialist on the State Office staff; except the authority to approve or disapprove foreclosure as outlined in § 1955.115(a)(2) of this subpart may not be redelegated. However, a duly-designated Acting State Director may approve or disapprove foreclosure.
( c ) The District Director is authorized to redelegate, in writing, any authority delegated to the District Director in this subpart to an Assistant District Director or District Loan Specialist determined by the District Director to be qualified; except the authority to approve or disapprove foreclosure as outlined in § 1955.15(a)(1) of this subpart may not be redelegated. However, a duly designated Acting District Director may approve or disapprove foreclosure. Authority of District Directors in this subpart applies to Area Loan Specialists in Alaska and the Director for the Western Pacific Territories.
( d ) The County Supervisor is authorized to redelegate, in writing, any authority delegated to the County Supervisor in this subpart to an Assistant County Supervisor, GS-7, or above, determined by the County Supervisor to be qualified. Authority of County Supervisors in this subpart applies to Area Loan Specialists in Alaska and Area Supervisors in the Western Pacific Territories and American Samoa.
( e ) The monetary limitations on acceptance of voluntary conveyance as provided in § 1955.10(a) of this subpart may *not* be redelegated from a higher-level official to a lower level official.
[53 FR 27826, July 25, 1988, as amended at 54 FR 6875, Feb. 15, 1989; 59 FR 43441, Aug. 24, 1994; 62 FR 44395, Aug. 21, 1997]