alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0137

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

GRANT WEST,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER 

Upon consideration of Defendant and Appellant’s Motion For Extension Of 

Time, and with good cause shown, Defendant and Appellant Grant West is hereby 

granted an extension of time until October 25, 2024 in which to prepare, file and 

serve Defendant and Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 5 2024

10/07/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0137
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Albert F. Satterwhite, certify that:

     1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of NBOG
Bancorporation, Inc. (the "Registrant");

     2.  Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

     3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

     4.  The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

          a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

          b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

          c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most
recent fiscal quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
this report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

     5.  The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, base on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

          a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
Registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

          b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal
controls.

Date:  March 30, 2005                         /s/ Albert F. Satterwhite
                                              ---------------------------
                                              Albert F. Satterwhite
                                              Principal Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc. (the “Registrant”) onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)    The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)    The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Registrant.

 
| Date: August 10,  2009 | By:    | /s/ Frank Perez         |
|-----------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                        |   | Name: Frank Perez       |
|                        |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
#### In the Matter of John P., Respondent, v Robert P. Whalen, as Commissioner of the Department of Health of the State of New York, et al., Appellants.

Judgment unanimously reversed, without costs, and petition dismissed. Memorandum: In proceedings arising out of charges of professional misconduct petitioner-respondent is not entitled to disclosure under section 87 of the Public Officers Law of statements made by patients treated by him, notes and memoranda made by the investigating committee from interviews with such patients, statements made by other physicians concerning the charges against petitioner-respondent, or medical records pertaining to the treatment of the patients obtained during the course of the committee’s investigation (see *Matter of Marshall v State Bd. for Professional Med. Conduct,*73 AD2d 798, mot for lv to app den 49 NY2d 709). (Appeal from judgment of Erie Supreme Court—CPLR art 78.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Hancock, Jr., Callahan and Moule, JJ.
# USING A GROUND STATION Mission Planner

3DROBOTICS.COM 1 Set up your ground station After you’ve installed Mission Planner on your ground station laptop, follow these instructions to connect IRIS and view live data in flight. To download Mission Planner, visit 3drobotics.com/iris/info. Connect the 3DR Radio to the micro-USB cable, and connect to your ground station laptop. 

# + 3DR Radio micro-usb cable Orient antenna vertically. When you’re ready to fly, power IRIS according to the preflight steps on the Flight Checklist, and open Mission Planner. 

## 2 Connect IRIS to Mission Planner In the top-right corner of Mission Planner, select the available COM port from the drop-down menu, set the rate to 57600 , and select Connect .


## 3 View IRIS’ status in flight Once IRIS is connected to Mission Planner, use the Flight Data screen to view location and status information.

Attitude

1 Heading direction 2 Bank angle 3 Altitude (black) and rate of climb (blue bar) 4 Ground speed 

### 1 2 3 4

Status

4Distance to current waypoint > current waypoint number 5 GPS status 6Battery status 1 Telemetry signal 2 GPS time 3 Currently enabled mode 

### 1 2
3 4 5 6
Location

1 Current heading 2 Direct path to current waypoint (during missions) 3 GPS-reported direction of travel 4 Actual flight path 5 Latitude & longitude 6 Altitude 

### 1 2 3 4 5 6
#### In re LITTLETON.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 12, 1906.)

In the matter of the application of Moses Littleton for admission to the bar.

No-opinion. Application granted.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than November 26, 2010.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:

                    1.                     *Robert John Dentel, Victor, Iowa, and Mary P. Howell, Ames, Iowa, individually; and the Robert John Dentel Family (Robert J. Dentel, Patricia A. Dentel, and three minor children) all of Victor, Iowa; and the Mary P. Howell Family (Mary P. Howell, Stephen J. Howell, and three minor)*                     all of Ames, Iowa; to control voting shares of Dentel Bancorporation, and thereby indirectly control voting shares of Victor State Bank, both of Victor, Iowa; Corydon State Bank, Corydon, Iowa; First State Bank of Colfax, Colfax, Iowa; Maxwell State Bank, Maxwell, Iowa; Pocahontas State Bank, Pocahontas, Iowa; and Panora State Bank, Panora, Iowa.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 8, 2010.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-28463 Filed 11-10-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
**Exhibit 32.2**
 
 
 **Certification
        Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**
 **As
        Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
 
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Maidenform Brands, Inc.
        (the “Company”) for the three-month period ended July 2, 2005, as filed
        with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
        I, Dorvin D. Lively, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
        pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
 
 (1)  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
        applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/
                Dorvin D. LivelyDorvin
                D. LivelyChief
                Financial Officer
  August
        30, 2005
 
 *This
        certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of
        that
        section, nor shall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
        filing
        under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
        except
        to the extent the Company specifically incorporates it by
        reference.*
  47
§ 15a.300 Admission. ( a ) *General.* No person shall, on the basis of sex, be denied admission, or be subjected to discrimination in admission, by any recipient to which §§ 15a.300 through 15a.310 apply, except as provided in §§ 15a.225 and 15a.230.
( b ) *Specific prohibitions.* ( 1 ) In determining whether a person satisfies any policy or criterion for admission, or in making any offer of admission, a recipient to which §§ 15a.300 through 15a.310 apply shall not: ( i ) Give preference to one person over another on the basis of sex, by ranking applicants separately on such basis, or otherwise;
( ii ) Apply numerical limitations upon the number or proportion of persons of either sex who may be admitted; or
( iii ) Otherwise treat one individual differently from another on the basis of sex.
( 2 ) A recipient shall not administer or operate any test or other criterion for admission that has a disproportionately adverse effect on persons on the basis of sex unless the use of such test or criterion is shown to predict validly success in the education program or activity in question and alternative tests or criteria that do not have such a disproportionately adverse effect are shown to be unavailable.
( c ) *Prohibitions relating to marital or parental status.* In determining whether a person satisfies any policy or criterion for admission, or in making any offer of admission, a recipient to which §§ 15a.300 through 15a.310 apply: ( 1 ) Shall not apply any rule concerning the actual or potential parental, family, or marital status of a student or applicant that treats persons differently on the basis of sex;
( 2 ) Shall not discriminate against or exclude any person on the basis of pregnancy, childbirth, termination of pregnancy, or recovery therefrom, or establish or follow any rule or practice that so discriminates or excludes;
( 3 ) Subject to § 15a.235(d), shall treat disabilities related to pregnancy, childbirth, termination of pregnancy, or recovery therefrom in the same manner and under the same policies as any other temporary disability or physical condition; and
( 4 ) Shall not make pre-admission inquiry as to the marital status of an applicant for admission, including whether such applicant is “Miss” or “Mrs.” A recipient may make pre-admission inquiry as to the sex of an applicant for admission, but only if such inquiry is made equally of such applicants of both sexes and if the results of such inquiry are not used in connection with discrimination prohibited by this part.
Exhibit 32.1





Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Maidenform Brands, Inc.
(the “Company”) for the quarter ended July 3, 2010, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Maurice S. Reznik,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Maurice S. ReznikMaurice
      S. ReznikChief
      Executive Officer(principal
      executive officer)





August
11, 2010





This certification shall not be
deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, nor shall it be
deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act
of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent the Company
specifically incorporates it by reference.
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent, <br><br>against<br><br>Karl Dozier, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Lyle E. Frank, J.), rendered December 1, 2017, convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal facilitation in the fourth degree, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Lyle E. Frank, J.), rendered December 1, 2017, affirmed. </p><p>The record establishes that defendant's guilty plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary. In full satisfaction of an accusatory instrument charging him with criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (<i>see</i> Penal Law ยง 220.39), a class B felony, the defendant pleaded guilty to criminal facilitation in the fourth degree (<i>see </i>Penal Law ยง 115.00[1]), a class A misdemeanor. At the plea proceeding, defendant confirmed that he was pleading guilty freely and voluntarily, that he was, in fact, guilty, that he had the opportunity to discuss the plea with his attorney, and that he understood he was giving up the rights to a trial, to remain silent and to confront witnesses (<i>see Boykin v Alabama</i>, 395 US 238 [1969]<i>; People v Conceicao</i>, 26 NY3d 375, 383 [2015]). Nothing in the record suggests that defendant's ability to make a voluntary decision to plead guilty was impaired in any way by his use (or possible use) of any "substances," and the court was able to view his demeanor and assess his capacity to plead guilty (<i>see People v Alexander</i>, 97 NY2d 482, 486 [2002]). Furthermore, as defendant pleaded guilty to an uncharged lesser offense, no factual basis for the plea was necessary (<i>see People v Johnson</i>, 23 NY3d 973, 975 [2014]).</p><p>In any event, the only relief defendant requests is the dismissal of the accusatory instrument, and he expressly requests that this court affirm his conviction if it does not grant dismissal. As dismissal is not warranted, we affirm on this basis as well (<a href="../2016/2016_03598.htm" target="_blank"><i>see People v Teron</i>, 139 AD3d 450</a> [2016]).</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: May 17, 2019<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
July 28, 2011

Mr. Edward J. Bennett

School Director

Teterboro School of Aeronautics

80 Moonachie Avenue Teterboro, NJ 07608

Dear Mr. Bennett:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from § 65.75(a) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can’t process your request and tells you what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can’t Process Your Request

We entered your June 14, 2011, exemption request for Teterboro School of Aeronautics (Teterboro) into the public docket (No. FAA-2011-0638), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent doesn’t comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons the exemption wouldn’t adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any more information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you m ust send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. We will consider the docket on your request open until we receive this required information from you. Please note that 14 CFR 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Don’t Hear From You

If we don’t hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without telling you further. If you have any questions or need more time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/ Brenda D. Courtney Manager, Aircraft and Airports Rules Division

Enclosure
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          20,862
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,058
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      12,521,328
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,461,992
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,711,971
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,331,160
<BONDS>                                      8,414,901
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,001,484)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,711,971
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,255,802
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  661,589
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             983,145
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,017,308)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,017,308)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,017,308)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (72.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 13.1 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

### Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

| In connection with the Form 20-F annual report of Schering Aktiengesellschaft (the "Company") for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "annual report"), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of such officer’s knowledge and belief, that: |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| **1.** | **the annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and**                                |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| **2.** | **the information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.** |

 

| Dated: March 6, 2006 | By: /s/ HUBERTUS ERLENName: Hubertus ErlenTitle: Chief Executive Officer                             |
|----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                 |                                                                                                 |
| Dated: March 6, 2006 | By: /s/ JÖRG SPIEKERKÖTTERName: Jörg SpiekerkötterTitle: Chief Financial Officer |