alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1435.313 Permanent transfer of acreage base histories under proportionate shares. ( a ) A sugarcane producer on a farm may transfer all or a portion of the producer's acreage base history of land owned, operated, or controlled to any other farm in the State that the producer owns, operates, or controls under the Deputy Administrator-issued instructions. The transfer will reduce permanently the transferring farm's sugarcane acreage base history and increase the receiving farm's crop acreage base. ( 1 ) All farm owners must agree in writing to the transfer.
( 2 ) Producers may transfer sugarcane acreage base histories under this section by the date the State FSA committee establishes annually.
( b ) Sugarcane acreage base that has been converted to nonagricultural use on or before May 13, 2002, may be transferred to other land suitable for the production of sugarcane under the following terms: ( 1 ) CCC must notify 1 or more affected landowners within 90 days of becoming aware of the conversion, of their rights to transfer the base to 1 or more farms owned by the landowner;
( 2 ) The landowner has 90 days from the date the landowner was notified to transfer the base;
( 3 ) If the landowner does not exercise this transfer right, the grower of record will have 90 days after being notified by CCC to transfer the base to 1 or more farms owned by the grower;
( 4 ) If the transfers as specified under paragraphs (b)(2) or (3) of this section are not accomplished during the specified periods, FSA county committee will place the base into a pool for possible reassignment to other farms;
( 5 ) After providing notice to farm owners, operators and growers of record in the county, the committee will accept requests from farm owners, operators, and growers in the county;
( 6 ) The county committee will assign the base to other sugarcane farms in the county that are eligible and capable of accepting the acreage base, based on a random drawing among requests received under paragraph (b)(5) of this section;
( 7 ) Any unassigned base will be made available to the State FSA committee and be allocated to remaining FSA county committees in the State representing counties with farms eligible for assignment of the base, based on a random drawing; and
( 8 ) After the acreage base has been reassigned, the acreage base will remain on the farm and subject to the transfer provisions of paragraph (a) of this section.
[67 FR 54928, Aug. 26, 2002, as amended at 74 FR 15367, Apr. 6, 2009]
#### § 1a.4 Limitations.

The powers granted by §§ 1a.2(a) and 1a.2(b) shall be exercised only when a designated official is engaged in an investigation of alleged or suspected felony violations of statutes administered by the Secretary of Agriculture or any agency of the Department.

[50 FR 13759, Apr. 8, 1985]
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theaccompanying report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 of GlobalPartners LP (the “Partnership”) and filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Eric Slifka, President andChief Executive Officer of Global GP LLC, the general partner of thePartnership, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.               the Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.               theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
| Dated: August 14, 2006 | By:    | /s/Eric Slifka |
|------------------------|--------|----------------|
|                   |   |           | Eric Slifka |
|                   |   |           | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                   |   |           | of Global GP LLC, general partner |
|                   |   |           | of Global Partners LP |

 

----
###### Editorial Note on Part 1924

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1924 appear at 80 FR 9870, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1924.274 Final inspection.

Except for emergency repairs, all repair work must be performed in accordance with subpart A of this part. In all cases, Rural Development will make a final inspection of the repair work performed before final payment is made for the work.
#### William Tockash et al., Respondents, v Charles E. Rockwell, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a default judgment of the Supreme *893Court, Dutchess County, entered February 6, 1979, dismissed, without costs or disbursements. No appeal lies from a default judgment. Order of the same court dated February 23, 1979, affirmed, without costs or disbursements. No opinion. Titone, J. P., Mangano, Margett and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
#### § 20.8 Failure to report.

Any person who knowingly fails to report export sales pursuant to the requirements of these regulations shall be fined not more than $25,000 or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 1 3

- 12538

Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 8:12

- cv

- 00970

- JDW

- TGW

GEORGE SZCZEKLIK,

Assignees of Neubert Aero Corp.,

MARTA SZCZEKLIK,

Assignees of Neubert Aero Corp.,

Plaintiff s

- Appellee s

,

versus

MARKEL INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,

Defendant

- Appellant.

__________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(December 6, 2013)

Before MARCUS, HILL

, and FAY, Circuit Judges

.

Case: 13-12538 Date Filed: 12/06/2013 Page: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:

Having reviewed the record and considered the arguments of the parties in

their respective briefs, we affirm the district court in all respects related to this

appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.

AFFIRMED. Case: 13-12538 Date Filed: 12/06/2013 Page: 2 of 2
98-2074.

#### State ex rel. Jones v. Preferred, Inc.

Franklin App. No. 97APD08-1031. On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied.
Editorial Note on Part 1944
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1944 appear at 80 FR 9885, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1944.538 Extending and revising grant agreements. ( a ) All requests extending the original grant agreement or revising the TSA program must be in writing. Such requests will be processed through the District Director. Any such requests will be processed in accordance with the processing procedure specified in § 1944.526 (b) and (c) of this subpart. The State Office will respond to the applicant within 30 days of receipt of the request in the State Office.
( b ) An extension of a grant beyond the two year term may be granted by the State Director when: ( 1 ) There are grant funds remaining and the grantee requests an extension at the end of the grant period,
( 2 ) The grantee has demonstrated its ability to conduct a comprehensive program of technical and supervisory assistance in accordance with the terms of its grant agreement and in a manner satisfactory to Rural Development,
( 3 ) The grantee is likely to complete the goals outlined in the initial proposal,
( 4 ) There is an unmet need to continue the delivery of the technical and supervisory assistance being provided by the grantee, and
( 5 ) The District Director recommends continuation of the grant until the grantee has expended all of the remaining grant funds.
( c ) Upon approval of the extension, the State Director will authorize the District Director to amend the ending date of the grant agreement and revise the budgets, if necessary, on behalf of the Government.
( d ) If the grant agreement must be revised and amended other than by extension, including any changes in the scope and objectives of the TSA program, the grantee will submit a revised budget and TSA program together with any information necessary to justify its requests. Such requests will be submitted to the State Director through the District Director.
( e ) The State Office will advise the National Office of all requests to extend or modify the original grant agreement. Prior concurrence of the National Office is not required unless the State Director so desires, in which case the State Director will advise the applicant that the request has been forwarded to the National Office for concurrence. The State Director's recommendation will accompany such requests.
( f ) Exhibit D to this subpart shall be executed upon approval of an extension of the grant period, or significant change in either the project budget or the objectives of the approved technical and supervisory activities.
( g ) If extension or modification is not approved, the State Office will notify the applicant in writing of the decision and advise the applicant of the appeal procedures under subpart B of part 1900 of this chapter.
Nicor Inc.
                                                                       Form S-8
                                                                  Exhibit 23.01



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement of
Nicor Inc. on Form S-8 of our reports dated February 28, 2003 (which report
expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph related
to the change in method of accounting for energy trading activities described in
the New Accounting Pronouncements -- Energy Trading Revenues note) and June 13,
2003, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Nicor Inc. for the year
ended December 31, 2002 and the Annual Report on Form 11-K of the Nicor
Companies Savings Investment Plan and the Nicor Gas Thrift Plan for the year
ended December 31, 2002, respectively.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Chicago, Illinois

July 25, 2003
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation Y, (12 CFR Part 225) to engage                     *de novo,*                     or to acquire or control voting securities or assets of a company, including the companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in § 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.                

Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than December 3, 2010.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (E. Ann Worthy, Vice President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:

                    1.                     *Family Bancorp, San Antonio, Texas,*                     to engage                     *de novo*                     in lending activities pursuant to section 225.28(b)(1) of Regulation Y.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 12, 2010.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-28954 Filed 11-16-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
C. A. No. 78-224.

#### State v. Elbert Barnes and Dennis R. Gomes.

*Dennis J. Boberts II,*Attorney General, *Faith A. LaSalle,*Special Assistant Attor*920ney General, for plaintiff, *Anthony E. Grilli,*for defendant Elbert Barnes, *Mary E. Levesque,*Assistant Public Defender, for defendant Dennis Gomes.

*919The petitions of defendants Elbert Barnes and Dennis R. Gomes to reargue are denied.
**EXHIBIT 32**
 
 
 
 **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350 AS ADOPTED**
 **PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Boundless Motor Sports Racing, Inc. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned President and Principal Accounting and Financial Officer of the Company each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
 .
  ****Date: December ___, 2004
By:
/s/ Paul A. KrugerPaul A. KrugerChairman of the BoardChief Executive Officer and President
  
 ****Date: December ___, 2004
By:
/s/ Glenn A. JacksonGlenn A. JacksonChief Financial Officer
 
 
 
 1
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Tennessee Commerce Bancorp, Inc. (the “Registrant”) onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)             The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)             The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Registrant.

 
|   | By:                     | /s/ Frank Perez |
|--------|-------------------------|-----------------|
|   | Frank Perez             |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   |                    |            |
|   | Dated: May 7, 2010 |

 

----
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.38


                                AMENDMENT NO. 8
                                    TO THE
                      HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC.
                     1993 NON-STATUTORY STOCK OPTION PLAN

                          Effective December 5, 2000


          WHEREAS, Health Management Associates, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), has established the Health Management Associates, Inc. 1993
Non-Statutory Stock Option Plan, effective December 15, 1992, as heretofore
amended (the "1993 Option Plan"); and

          WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the 1993 Option Plan pursuant to
Section 11 of the 1993 Option Plan in the manner herein set forth;

          NOW, THEREFORE, Subsection (a) of Section 10 of the 1993 Option Plan
is hereby amended and replaced in its entirety, to provide as follows:

                    10.     Form of Options and Conditions to Their Exercise.

                   "(a) Each Option by its terms will provide that it is not
               transferable by the grantee otherwise than by will or the laws of
               descent and distribution, and that it is exercisable, during the
               lifetime of the grantee, only by him; provided, however, that the
               Committee in its discretion may permit a grantee to transfer an
               Option owned by him to a trust of which he is the sole lifetime
               trustee and sole lifetime beneficiary."

          Except as amended hereby, the 1993 Option Plan shall remain in full
force and effect in accordance with its terms.

          This amendment No. 8 to the Health Management Associates, Inc. 1993
Non-Statutory Stock Option Plan was authorized, approved and adopted by the
Board of Directors of the Company on December 5, 2000.

                                         /s/ Timothy R. Parry
                                         --------------------------------------
                                         Timothy R. Parry, Corporate Secretary

                                      59
Editorial Note on Part 1940
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1940 appear at 80 FR 9876, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1940.585 Community Facility loans. ( a ) *Amount available for allocations.* See § 1940.552(a) of this subpart.
( b ) *Basic formula criteria, data source and weight.* See § 1940.552(b) of this subpart. ( 1 ) The criteria used in the basic formula are: ( i ) State's percentage of national rural population—50 percent.
( ii ) State's percentage of national rural population with incomes below the poverty level—25 percent.
( iii ) State's percentage of national nonmetropolitan unemployment—25 percent.
( 2 ) The data source for the first criterion is the most recent decennial Census data. The data source for the second and third criteria is the 5-year data from the American Community Survey (ACS). Each criterion is assigned a specific weight according to its relevance in determining need. The percentage representing each criterion is multiplied by the weight factor and summed to arrive at a State factor (SF). The SF cannot exceed 0.05. Equation 1 to Paragraph (b) SF = (criterion (b)(1)(i) × 50 percent) + (criterion (b)(1)(ii) × 25 percent) + (criterion (b)(1)(iii) × 25 percent)
( c ) *Basic formula allocation.* See § 1940.552(c) of this subpart. States receiving administrative allocations do not receive formula allocations.
( d ) *Transition formula.* See § 1940.552(d) of this subpart. The percentage range for the transition formula equals 30 percent (±15%).
( e ) *Base allocation.* See § 1940.552(e) of this subpart. States receiving administrative allocations do not receive base allocations.
( f ) *Administrative allocation.* See § 1940.552(f) of this subpart. States participating in the formula base allocation procedures do not receive administrative allocations.
( g ) *Reserve.* See § 1940.552(g) of this subpart. States may request funds by forwarding a completed copy of guide 26 of subpart A of part 1942 of this chapter (available in any Rural Development office), to the National Office. Generally, a request for additional funds will not be honored unless the State has insufficient funds to obligate the loan requested.
( h ) *Pooling of funds.* See § 1940.552(h) of this subpart. Funds are generally pooled at mid-year and year-end. Pooled funds will be placed in the National Office reserve and will be made available administratively.
( i ) *Availability of the allocation.* See § 1940.552(i) of this subpart. The allocation of funds is made available for States to obligate on an annual basis although the Office of Management and Budget apportions it to the Agency on a quarterly basis.
( j ) *Suballocation by the State Director.* See § 1940.552(j) of this subpart. State Director has the option to suballocate to District Offices.
( k ) *Other documentation.* Not applicable.
[50 FR 24180, June 10, 1985, as amended at 58 FR 54485, Oct. 22, 1993; 80 FR 9877, Feb. 24, 2015; 89 FR 34961, May 1, 2024]
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. No. 97-9198 Non-Argument Calendar. Charles A. KENT, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.SECRETARY OF LABOR, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, DefendantAppellee. Aug. 4, 1998. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. (No. 1:97-CV231-TWT), Thomas W. Thrash, Judge. Before GODBOLD, HILL and FAY, Senior Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Charles A. Kent, pro se, appeals the dismissal of his petition for mandamus, 28 U.S.C. § 1361. On appeal, Kent essentially argues that the di strict court should have granted his petition for mandamus and ordered the Secretary of Labor to comply with 42 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1) by conducting an investigation of the Georgia Department of Labor. Whether a district court has subject-matter ju risdiction over an action is a question of law that we review de novo. Tamiami Partners, Ltd. v. Mi ccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida, 999 F.2d 503, 506 (11th Cir.1993). Upon review of the petition, the Secretary's motion to dismiss, and the district court's order, and consideration of parties' briefs, we find no reversible error.2 The language of 42 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1), which is the statute upon which Kent relies, shows that the district court did not have jurisdiction to grant his petition for ma ndamus. This statute provides that whenever the Secretary finds, after a hearing, that the state agency has effected "a denial, in a substantial number of cases, of unemployment compensation to individuals entitled thereto," by a state agency, the Secretary "shall notif y such State agency that further payments will not be made to the State until the [Secretary] is satisfied that ther e is no longer any such denial of failure to comply." 42 U.S.C. § 503(b)(1). Thus, the Secretary's decision whether to invoke this statute is discretionary. Moreover, the statute aut horizes the Secretary to act on behalf of all those who were denied unemployment compensation, and notindividuals who were denied such benefits. See id. We conclude that because mandamus was not an appropriate means of relief here, the district court lacked jurisdiction. AFFIRMED.
DocketNo. FAA-20i 

## 1- D03:2.. Record ofEx Parte Contacts 

## pl.C/O -NJA-.236-/1dJ Directorate Identifier: -AD With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, de)? (You might need tosubmit aseparate record to the Rules Docket. TheAD Manual defines "Ex Parte (Jon/acts.

# 'j'-
ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE RESPONSE ATA 

### Mark Lopez 9/8/2010 Concur.

OtherJAdditionallnfonnation: