alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 4.7  


 
 

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED
Schedule 1 to Exhibit 4.6
  Individual Deviations from Standard Non-Compete Agreement by Members of the Management Board(1)    
    



	Name
 
	 	For reporting

period
	 	Geographic

scope; §1
	 	Industry

scope; §1
	 	Term; §1
	 	Compensation;

§2
	 	Deducted

payments;

§2
	 	Penalty; §5

	Kai-Uwe Ricke	 	1.1. to 31.12.2004	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	

Dr. Karl-Gerhard Eick	
 	

1.1. to 31.12.2004	
 	

 	
 	

 	
 	

 	
 	

 	
 	

 	
 	

 
	

Dr. Heinz Klinkhammer(2)	
 	

1.1. to 31.12.2004	
 	

Confidential material redacted and filed separately
	 	 	 	 	with the Commission
	René Oberman	 	1.1. to 31.12.2004	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	

Konrad F. Reiss	
 	

1.1. to 31.12.2004	
 	

 	
 	

 	
 	

 	
 	

 	
 	

 	
 	

 
	

Walter Raizner	
 	

1.1. to 31.12.2004	
 	

 	
 	

 	
 	

 	
 	

 	
 	

 	
 	

 







	(1)
	Thomas
Holtrop and Josef Brauner resigned in 2004.



	(2)
	Since
Dr. Klinkhammer joined our Company on April 1, 1996 and is the most senior member of our Management Board, the wording of his agreement deviates from the standard
agreement in language, but not in substance, and certain details, which the Company believes are insignificant, differ from the standard agreement. 











QuickLinks


CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED Schedule 1 to Exhibit 4.6 Individual Deviations from Standard Non-Compete Agreement by Members of the Management Board(1)
#### § 1902.11 Servicing Office records.

A record of funds deposited in a supervised bank account will be maintained on Form RD 402-2 in accordance with the Forms Manual Insert. The record of funds provided for operating purposes by another creditor or grantor will be on a separate Form RD 402-2 so that they can be clearly identified.

[70 FR 59228, Oct. 12, 2005]
#### § 1970.103 Supplementing EAs.

If the applicant makes substantial changes to a proposal or if new relevant environmental information is brought to the attention of the Agency after the issuance of an EA or FONSI, supplementing an EA may be necessary before the action has been implemented. Depending on the nature of the changes, the EA will be supplemented by revising the applicable section(s) or by appending the information to address potential impacts not previously considered. If an EA is supplemented, public notification will be required in accordance with § 1970.102(b)(7) and (8).
EXHIBIT32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 USC, SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the amended quarterly report of Northern Ethanol, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB/A1 for the nine month period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|Dated: January 15, 2007 | s/Gordon Laschinger

Gordon Laschinger, Chief Executive Officer
|----------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------
#### Payne *vs.*Smith.

Case 153..

Error to iho Franklin Circuit; Todd, Judge-

*Statute of limitation, plea of. Actio non accrevit,*

Wherea timVdoesmit immediately *501-use u or i!i tho make-1- f a i roirnse i ut results from a breech happening i oars u'ti l- (lie pn - miso is irado, the olea of non aosmusit will n -> tars is no bar.

*500October 13.

Judge Underwood

delivered the opinion of the court.

Where a cause of action does not immediately arise upon the making of a promise, but res,1bs from a breach happening years after the promise is made, the plea of non assumpsit within *501five years is not a bar. If the limitation is relied on, it should be *actio non*accrevit, &c. The limitation does not run until there has been a breach of the promise. An undertaking to pay money five years hence is not barred until five years after the money has become due.

Monroe, for plaintiff.

The statute of frauds did not make the declaration bad, because no writing was set out. The judg ment upon the demurrer was erroneous. The plea was bad.

Judgment reversed, witli costs, and cause remanded for judgment against the plea.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 221 (Wednesday, November 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 70300]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29092]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


National Science Board; Sunshine Act Meetings; Notice

    The National Science Board's Ad Hoc Committee on Honorary Awards, 
pursuant to NSF regulations (45 CFR part 614), the National Science 
Foundation Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1862n-5), and the Government in 
the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice in regard to the 
scheduling of a teleconference for the transaction of National Science 
Board business and other matters specified, as follows:

Date and Time: November 23, 2010, 3:30 p.m.-4:30 p.m.

Subject Matter: Review and discussion of selection criteria, discussion 
of candidates for the 2010 Vannevar Bush Award, and discussion of 
candidates for the 2010 National Science Board Public Service Awards.

Status: Closed.

Location: This meeting will be held at National Science Foundation, 
4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230.

Updates & Point of Contact: Please refer to the National Science Board 
Web site http://www.nsf.gov/nsb for additional information and schedule 
updates (time, place, subject matter or status of meeting) may be found 
at http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/notices/. Point of contact for this meeting 
is Jennie L. Moehlmann, National Science Board Office, 4201Wilson 
Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: (703) 292-7000.

Daniel A. Lauretano,
Counsel to the National Science Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-29092 Filed 11-15-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Editorial Note on Part 1951
Editorial Notes: 1. Some of the exhibits referenced in this part 1951 are not published in the Code of Federal Regulations. Exhibits are available in any Rural Development office. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 1951 appear at 80 FR 9890-9894, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1951.262 Farm Credit Programs—graduation of borrowers. ( a ) - ( d ) [Reserved]
( e ) *Graduation candidates.* Borrowers who are classified “commercial” or “standard” are graduation candidates. At least every 2 years, all borrowers who have a current classification of commercial or standard must submit a year-end balance sheet, actual financial performance information for the most recent year, and a projected budget for the current year to enable the Agency to reclassify their status and determine their ability to graduate.
( f ) *Sending prospectus information to lenders.* ( 1 ) The Agency will distribute a borrower's prospectus to local lenders for possible refinancing. The borrower's permission is not required, however, the borrower must be notified of this action.
( 2 ) The borrower is responsible for any application fees. The borrower has 30 days from the date the borrower is notified of lender interest in refinancing to make application, if required by the lender, and refinance the FLP loan. For good cause, the borrower may be granted a reasonable amount of additional time by the Agency.
[61 FR 35927, July 9, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 10120, Mar. 5, 1997]
#### § 1724.3 Definitions.

Terms used in this part have the meanings set forth in § 1710.2 of this chapter. References to specific RUS forms and other RUS documents, and to specific sections or lines of such forms and documents, shall include the corresponding forms, documents, sections and lines in any subsequent revisions of these forms and documents. In addition to the terms defined in § 1710.2 of this chapter, the following terms have the following meanings for the purposes of this part:

*Architect* means a registered or licensed person employed by the borrower to provide architectural services for a project and duly authorized assistants and representatives.

*Engineer* means a registered or licensed person, who may be a staff employee or an outside consultant, to provide engineering services and duly authorized assistants and representatives.

*Force account construction* means construction performed by the borrower's employees.

*GPO* means Government Printing Office.

*NESC* means the National Electrical Safety Code.

*RE Act* means the Rural Electrification Act of 1936 as amended (7 U.S.C. 901 *et seq.*).

*Repowering* means replacement of the steam generator or the prime mover or both at a generating plant.

*RUS* means Rural Utilities Service.

*RUS approval* means written approval by the Administrator or a representative with delegated authority. RUS approval must be in writing, except in emergency situations where RUS approval may be given orally followed by a confirming letter.

*RUS financed* means financed or funded wholly or in part by a loan made or guaranteed by RUS, including concurrent supplemental loans required by § 1710.110 of this chapter, loans to reimburse funds already expended by the borrower, and loans to replace interim financing.

[63 FR 35314, June 29, 1998, as amended at 63 FR 58284, Oct. 30, 1998]
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Spansion Inc. (the
Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:





| | (i.) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 26, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (ii.) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ----- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                                   
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ----------------------------------
|Date: August 5, 2011 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Randy W. Furr                 
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Randy W. Furr                     
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Financial Officer
98-1630.

#### State ex rel. Love v. Coyne.

In Procedendo. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1962

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1962 appear at 80 FR 9902, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1962.28 [Reserved]
November 13, 1979

Appeal No. 78-134.

#### Robert S. Lynam *et al. v.*Cranston General Hospital.

*Fessel and Goldman, Robert S. Goldman,*for plaintiffs. *John F. Dolan,*for defendant.

This case was argued November 8, 1979, pursuant to a motion to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed.

The thrust of the plaintiffs’ appeal was based upon alleged trial errors which were not raised by timely objections in the Superior Court. Since the errors alleged in the case of Robert S. Lynam were not asserted in the court below, and in light of a verdict for the defendant in said case, the question of the propriety of directing a verdict against plaintiff Marie C. Hall becomes moot, since she would only have been entitled to a judgment in the event that defendant was liable to her son. Therefore, plaintiffs having failed to show cause, the appeal is denied and dismissed, the judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed, and the case is remitted to the Superior Court.
Costello Insurance Associates, Inc.

April 22, 2015

Mike Levin Photo a dba of Mike Levin

29141 Susquehanna Rd

Roslyn, PA 19001

RE: Confirmation of Coverage: Effective April 22, 2015 at 12:01 a.m. to May 22, 2015 at 12:01 a.m.

 (Annual policy will be issued soon after receipt of completed application)

Dear Mr. Levin:

Thank you for allowing us to place your aircraft insurance. Coverage was placed with U S Specialty Insurance 

Co. per the above effective date as follows:

INSURED AIRCRAFT: UAV #1 - 2015 Kong Copter X8 Custom UAV No Serial Number

 UAV #2 - 2015 3D Robotics Iris + Serial #RS1427200077

AIRCRAFT HULL COVERAGE: None – Liability Only.

LIMITS OF LIABILITY: UAV #1 - $1,000,000 combined single limit of bodily injury and 

property damage per occurrence.

UAV #2 - $500,000 combined single limit of bodily injury and property 

damage per occurrence

APPROVED PURPOSE: Pleasure and Business plus Aerial Photography/Mapping for Hire

Note: No coverage for indoor operations.

APPROVED PILOTS: Any pilot approved by the Named Insured or their designee

ANNUAL PREMIUM: UAV #1 - $995.00 + UAV #2 - $500.00 

Total fleet premium of $1495.00

Should you have any questions or other aviation insurance needs, please do not hesitate to call. It is a pleasure 

serving you.

Best Regards,

This insurance is subject to the terms, conditions, & limitations 

of the policy (ies) in current use by the insuring companies.

Pat Costello

R

P. O. BOX 28280 / 428 E. SOUTHERN AVENUE / TEMPE, AZ. 85285-8280

TEL: 480-968-7746 / 800-528-6483 / FAX: 480-967-3828 / insure@aviationi.com
**Exhibit 15**

 

February 4, 2010

 

MWIVeterinary Supply, Inc.Meridian, ID

 

Wehave reviewed, in accordance with the standards of the Public CompanyAccounting Oversight Board (United States), the unaudited interim financialinformation of MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc. and subsidiaries for thethree-month periods ended December 31, 2009, and 2008, as indicated in ourreport dated February 4, 2010; because we did not perform an audit, weexpressed no opinion on that information.

 

We areaware that our report referred to above, which is included in your QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2009, isincorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-127879,333-127880, and 333-149275 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-141078on Form S-3.

 

Wealso are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) underthe Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the RegistrationStatement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared orcertified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

 

 

/s/ DELOITTE &TOUCHE LLP

Boise, Idaho

 

----
MOTION DOCKET

98-1268.

#### Buckeye Union Ins. Co. v. New England Ins. Co.

Certified State Law Question, No. 97-3856. On review of preliminary memoranda pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XVIII(6) and on motion for admission *pro hac vice*of Louis G. Adolfsen and S. Dwight Stevens. The motion for admission *pro hac vice*is granted and the court will answer the following questions found at page 4 of the Certification Order of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit:

> “1. When an insurance company is found to be guilty of ‘bad faith’ with ‘actual malice’ because it failed to settle a tort case against its insured, does such conduct constitute the type of intentional tort that is uninsurable under Ohio law?

> “2. Does such a finding of bad faith with actual malice collaterally estop Buckeye [Union Insurance Company] from litigating this ease?

> “3. Under Ohio law does an exclusion in an insurance policy barring coverage for personal dishonesty, fraudulent breach of trust, intention to deceive, or intent to defraud embrace an insurer’s bad faith with actual malice caused by its failure to settle a tort case?”

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1948

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1948 appear at 80 FR 9888, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1948.65 Relocation Act requirements.

The policies and regulations contained in title 7, subtitle A, part 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations (Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970) will apply to site development and acquisition grants and other actions under this program.
Exhibit 32.1

STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF 

NOLAND COMPANY

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

	In connection with the quarterly report of Noland Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lloyd U. Noland, III, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Noland Company and will be retained by Noland Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

Lloyd U. Noland, III

Lloyd U. Noland, III

Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

August 5, 2004
§ 1735.13 Location of facilities and service for nonrural subscribers. ( a ) When it is determined by the Administrator to be necessary in order to furnish or improve telephone service in rural areas, loans may be made for the improvement, expansion, construction, acquisition, and operation of telephone lines, facilities, or systems without regard to their geographical location.
( b ) To the greatest extent practical, loans are limited to providing telephone facilities that serve subscribers in rural areas. In order to furnish and improve service to rural subscribers it may at times be necessary to provide loan funds to finance telephone facilities which ( 1 ) will also serve nonrural subscribers, or
( 2 ) are located in nonrural areas. Loans may be approved to finance such facilities if the Administrator determines, on a case-by-case basis, that ( i ) the primary purpose of the loan is to provide service to rural areas and
( ii ) the financing of facilities for nonrural subscribers is necessary and incidental to furnishing or improving telephone service in rural areas.
( c ) Loan funds may be approved for facilities to serve nonrural subscribers only if (1) the principal purpose of the loan is to furnish and improve rural service and (2) the use of loan funds to serve nonrural subscribers is necessary and incidental to the principal purpose of the loan. The following are examples of purposes for which such loans may be made (such loans are not limited to these examples): ( 1 ) In the case of construction of a new system, if the loan would not be economically feasible and self-liquidating unless the nonrural as well as the rural portions of the telephone service area are included in the proposed system, the loan may include funds for both portions.
( 2 ) Where the acquisition of an existing system located in and serving a nonrural area is necessary to serve as the nucleus of an expanded system to furnish area coverage service in rural areas, the loan may include funds to finance the acquisition.
( 3 ) When a system is being converted to modern service for rural subscribers, the loan may include funds for the conversion of the nonrural facilities, if the rural service will be improved as a result of such nonrural improvements and it is impractical to finance and serve the nonrural and rural areas separately.
( 4 ) A loan may include funds to serve nonrural subscribers located in community centers frequently called by the rural subscribers if the construction to serve such nonrural subscribers will be incidental to, and contribute substantially to, the provision of adequate service for the rural subscribers.
( d ) RUS may also approve financing for facilities to serve nonrural areas if, at the time financing was first approved by RUS: ( 1 ) The nonrural area had a population of 1,500 or less when first financed by RUS and that financing was approved prior to November 1, 1993; or
( 2 ) The nonrural area had a population of 5,000 or less when first financed by RUS and that financing was approved on or after November 1, 1993.
[54 FR 13351, Apr. 3, 1989. Redesignated at 55 FR 39395, Sept. 27, 1990, as amended at 58 FR 66253, Dec. 20, 1993]
PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT CANDIDATE PETITION - MINOR POLITICAL PARTY 

Notes: - All information on this form becomes a public record upon receipt by the Supervisor of Elections. 

- It is a crime to knowingly sign more than one petition for a candidate. [Section 104.185, Florida Statutes]

- If all requested information on this form is not completed, the form will not be valid as a Candidate Petition form.

I, the undersigned, a registered voter 

(print name as it appears on your voter information card) 

in said state and county, petition to have the candidates for President and Vice President nominated by

 _________________________________________________________________________________________

 (insert name of minor political party) 

placed on the General Election ballot for the presidential election occuring in __________.

 (insert year) 

Date of Birth or 

(MM/DD/YY) 

Voter Registration Number Address 

City County State Zip Code 

Signature of Voter Date Signed (MM/DD/YY) 

[to be completed by voter] 

Rule 1S-2.045, F.A.C. DS-DE 18B (Eff. 09/11) 

Exhibit A

Case 4:20-cv-00110-MW-MAF Document 35-4 Filed 05/29/20 Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CLAYTON RAYMOND AXE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 318 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 12th day of September, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of

Appeal is DENIED

.