alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION**     I, Brian M. Carter, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Dirt Motor Sports, Inc.2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this annual report is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresas of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the“Evaluation Date”); andc) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls whichcould adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any materialweaknesses in internal controls; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly reportwhether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors thatcould significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recentevaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses.          Date:March 30, 2007 /s/ Brian M. Carter         Brian M. Carter,    Chief Financial Officer  
52
#### Joseph F. Hasman, appellant, v. John F. Zidlicky and Henry Calek, appellees.

Gen. No. 33,175.

Opinion filed May 29, 1929.

Charles J. Michal, for appellant; William Ritchie, of counsel. Charles Vlaeh, for appellees; Andrew J. O’Donnell, of counsel.

Mr. Presiding Justice Holdom

delivered the opinion of the court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold its annual forum on small business capital formation on November 18, 2010 beginning at 9 a.m.

The forum will include a panel discussion focusing on selected provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act relating to securities regulation and small business and presentations by private organizations concerned with small business capital formation.

The panel discussion and presentations will take place in the Auditorium of the Commission's headquarters at 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC and will be open to the public with seating on a first-come, first-served basis. Doors will open at 8:30 a.m. Visitors will be subject to security checks.

For further information, please contact Anthony Barone at 202-551-3261.

 November 10, 2010.

Elizabeth M. Murphy,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-28865 Filed 11-12-10; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1961 

To amend title 46, United States Code, to extend the exemption from the 

fire-retardant materials construction requirement for vessels operating 

within the Boundary Line. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 14, 2013 

Mr. CHABOT (for himself, Mr. CLAY, Mr. WENSTRUP, and Mr. MASSIE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 46, United States Code, to extend the exemption from the fire-retardant materials construction requirement for vessels operating within the Boundary 

Line. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF EXEMPTION. 

4 Section 3503(a) of title 46, United States Code, is 

5 amended by striking ‘‘2008’’ and inserting ‘‘2028’’. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PUSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended October 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material respect the financial condition and results of operations of Vitro Diagnostics, Inc.   Date:  January 28, 2011 By: _/s/ James R. Musick Name:  James R. Musick Title: President, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Vitro Diagnostics, Inc.
```

[108th Congress Public Law 296]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ296.108]

[[Page 118 STAT. 1094]]

Public Law 108-296
108th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
550 Nebraska Avenue in Kansas City, Kansas, as the ``Newell George Post 
        Office Building''. <<NOTE: Aug. 9, 2004 -  [H.R. 4222]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 550 
Nebraska Avenue in Kansas City, Kansas, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Newell George Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Newell George Post Office 
Building''.

    Approved August 9, 2004.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4222:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD,
                                                        Vol. 150 (2004):
            June 21, considered and passed House.
            July 22, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### § 16.6 Compliance.

USDA agencies will monitor compliance with this part in the course of regular oversight of USDA programs.

[89 FR 15709, Mar. 4, 2024]
#### §§ 1927.60-1927.99 [Reserved]
Editorial Note on Part 1980
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1980 appear at 80 FR 9905, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1980.1202 Special broadband and smart utility facility funding. ( a ) The Secretary, acting directly or through authority delegated to the RD agency heads, may allow a recipient of an RD grant, loan, or loan guarantee to use up to 10 percent of project funds for any purpose outlined in § 1980.1205 and in compliance with this part.
( b ) Prior to exercising authority under this part, the Agency with a request for special broadband authority (the Awarding Agency) shall consult with the Administrator of the affected RD Agency to determine: ( 1 ) If the provision of broadband service by the recipient (or another party under a wholesale broadband service agreement) would cause competitive harm to a current Rural Development borrower, grantee, or guaranteed lender with respect to an active project for broadband deployment and provision of services With respect to a current RD awardee in the project service area that has significantly defaulted on, or not material complied with its award requirements, the affected RD agency may make a finding of no competitive harm unless it is necessary to protect the government's interest;
( 2 ) If the recipient intends to use the funds for the provision of retail broadband service and, if so, assist the agency in providing public notice and receiving responses from existing service providers, as provided in this rule, so that a determination can be made as to whether the minimum acceptable level of broadband service exists in the service area at the time of the request; and
( 3 ) If the recipient does not intend to provide broadband service, and the funded facilities will only be used for internal use, such as smart utility, there shall be no finding of competitive harm and the recipient shall be relieved of the public notice provision requirement of § 1980.1207 and reporting requirements of § 1980.1209. Note that recipients funding broadband facilities for internal use under an RD program's existing authority would not be subject to this part with respect to the 10 percent funding limitation; however, if such facilities are contemplated to provide retail broadband service in the future, the public notice requirements of § 1980.1206(b) and (c) will apply.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1955

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1955 appear at 80 FR 9895, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### §§ 1955.125-1955.126 [Reserved]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

A B C D E F G H I J K L M O P Q R S T U V W

Subgrant Awards Table (Date)

Grantee name

Subgrantee Name Year ___ Subgrantee Start 

and End Date

Year __ Subgrantee 

Award Amount 

(Federal)

Year ___ Subgrantee 

Award Amount 

(Intermediary Match)

Year ___ Subgrantee 

Award Total 

(Federal + Intermediary 

Match) Automatically 

Populated

Year____Subgrantee 

Match Funds Raised 

Year ____ Subgrantee 

Match Funds Expended

Year ____ Subgrantee 

Federal Funds Expended

Year ____ Subgrantee 

Intermediary Funds 

Expended

Year ___ Subgrantee 

Start and End Date

Year ___ 

Subgrantee 

Award Amount 

(Federal)

Year __ Subgrantee 

Award Amount 

(Intermediary 

Match)

Year __ Subgrantee 

Award Total (Federal 

+ Intermediary 

Match) 

Automatically 

Populated

Year____ 

Subgrantee 

Match Funds 

Raised 

Year ____ 

Subgrantee 

Match Funds 

Expended

Year ____ 

Subgrantee 

Federal 

Funds 

Expended

Year ____ 

Subgrantee 

Intermediary 

Funds 

Expended

Year ___ 

Subgrantee 

Start and End 

Date

Total 

Subgrantee 

Funds Awarded 

(Federal and 

Intermediary) 

(Automatically 

Populated)

Subgrantee 

Match Funds 

Raised 

(Cummulative to 

Date) 

(Automatically 

Populated)

Subgrantee 

Match Funds 

Expended 

(Cummulative 

to Date) 

(Automatically 

Populated)

Subgrantee Federal 

Funds Expended 

(Cummulative to 

Date) 

(Automatically 

Populated)

Subgrantee 1 0 0

Subgrantee 2 0 0

Subgrantee 3 0 0

Subgrantee 4 0 0
Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3692 Filed 03/07/23 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3692 Filed 03/07/23 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 3692 Filed 03/07/23 Page 3 of 3
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*

#### § 1470.30 Fair treatment of tenants and sharecroppers.

Participants must divide payments received under this part in the manner specified in the applicable contract. NRCS will ensure that tenants and sharecroppers who have an interest in acreage being enrolled receive equitable treatment, as determined by NRCS. NRCS may refuse to enter into a contract when joint applicants seeking enrollment disagree on an applicant's eligibility to participate in the contract as a tenant.
•D u U V " <•» - ^ ' 

# iM^fl^i^ETTER S OPSUPPORT ; :

QFnC E O F IK C UAVO n JONATHA N WEINZAPF6 L Augus t 25 , 201 0 

# CITYOFEVANSVILL E ON E N.W . MARTI N LUTHE R KING , JR . BLVD . •ROO M 30 2

EVANSVILLE . INDIA N A47708-1S3 3 (812 ) 4 38-496 2 -FA X(812 ) 436-496 6 •TOD/TT V(612 ) 436-492 8 Mnww.EvansvitoGo vor g C D



### > 

# 3 s ^ o o Th e Honorabl e Ra

yLaHoo d Secretar yo fTransportatio n U.S . Departmen t o fTransportatio n 40 0 7'^Sueet.S W Washington , D.C . 2059 0 Dea rSecretar

yLaHood : Evansvill e Regiona l Airpor t(th e Airport ) play s a ke yrol e i n connectin g Souther n Indian a an d Northwes t Kentuckyt o th e rest o fth e nation . Fo rto o long , th e Airpor t has bee n saddle d wit h hig h averag e airfares , suppressin g trave l an d forcin g businesse s t o look elsewher e whe n thinkin g abou t expansion . Evansvill e ha

s th e highes t averag e fare s i n th e Great Lake s regio n - averagin g S22 5 eac h wa yo r $45 0 roun d tri p a

s o fth e yea rende d first quarte r201 0 - an d i s th e singl e mos t expensiv e medium-size d marke tt o fl yint o o rou t o fi n th e entir e Grea t Lake s region . An d i tcoul d ge t wors e thi s fall , a

s Delt a Ai rLines , followin g it s merge rwit h Northwest , ha s announce d i t wil l leav e th e Evansville-Memphi s market . Thi s los s o fseat s wil l exacerbat e th e far e pressure i n th e Evansvill e market . Evansvill e Regiona l Airpor t mus td o somethin g t o brin g lowe rfare s t o th e region . Lo wfar e leade rAirTra n ha s expresse d interes t i n servin g Evansville . Bu t i n orde rfo rAirTra n t o tak e a risk

i n launchin g servic e t o a ne wcit yi n th e curren t economi cenvironment , i twil l requir e a revenu e guarante e t o offse tpotentia l losse s durin g th e start-u p phase . A s such , I suppor

tth e Airport' s applicatio n fo ra Small Communit yAi rServic e Developmen t Gran tfro m th e U.S . Departmen to fTransportation . Sincerely , Jonatha n Weinza ' Mayo r

Evansvill e Regiona l Airport - Smal l Communit yAi rServic e Developmen t Gran t - Augus t 201 0 

# 2 4
EXHIBIT 31.2
 Certification
      a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b.
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;c.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andd.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and
  a.
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting, which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: November 5, 2009
    /s/ Richard N. BurgerChief Financial Officer, ExecutiveVice President, Secretary and Treasurer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1356 

IN RE: DAVID M. KISSI,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

(8:05-cr-00254-AW)

Submitted: June 22, 2006 Decided: June 28, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David M. Kissi, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

David M. Kissi petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking

an order postponing his criminal trial, directing a change of

venue, and recusing the district court judge. We conclude that

Kissi is not entitled to mandamus relief.

Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has

a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & Loan

Ass’n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Further, mandamus is a

drastic remedy and should only be used in extraordinary

circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394,

402 (1976); In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987).

Finally, mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In

re United Steelworkers, 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir. 1979). 

The relief sought by Kissi is not available by way of

mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant Kissi’s motion to proceed

in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cascade Technologies Corp.  (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Daniel L. Farkas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: November 8, 2010  /s/ Daniel L. FarkasName:Daniel L. FarkasTitle:Chief Executive Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cascade Technologies Corp.  and will be retained by Cascade Technologies Corp.  and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.   *This certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
I 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1186 

To amend the Department of State Authorities Act, Fiscal Year 2017 to 

modify the biannual report on overseas capital construction projects. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 24, 2023 

Mr. LYNCH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Department of State Authorities Act, Fiscal 

Year 2017 to modify the biannual report on overseas 

capital construction projects. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Embassy Construction 

5 Accountability Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MODIFICATIONS TO BIANNUAL REPORT ON OVER7 SEAS CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (a) of section 118 of 

9 the Department of State Authorities Act, Fiscal Year 

10 2017 (Public Law 114–323; 22 U.S.C. 304) is amended— 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•HR 1186 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘and the Committees on Appro2 priations’’ and inserting ‘‘, the Committees on Ap3 propriations’’; and 

4 (2) by inserting after ‘‘House of Representa5 tives,’’ the following: ‘‘, and the Committee on 

6 Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the 

7 Senate and the Committee on Oversight and Ac8 countability of the House of Representatives’’. 

9 (b) CONTENTS.—Subsection (b) of such section is 

10 amended— 

11 (1) in paragraph (2), by adding at the end be12 fore the period the following: ‘‘and, when the current 

13 cost estimate exceeds the initial cost estimate by 15 

14 percent or more, an explanation of the causal or con15 tributing factors resulting in the increased estimated 

16 cost, as well as how the Department plans to miti17 gate the risk of further potential cost increases’’; 

18 and 

19 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

20 ‘‘(10) If the current date of estimated comple21 tion reported under paragraph (9) exceeds the date 

22 of estimated completion reported under paragraph 

23 (8) by 180 days or more, a description of the causal 

24 or contributing factors that resulted in the revised 

25 estimated completion date, as well as how the DeVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:44 Mar 20, 2023 Jkt 039200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1186.IH H1186

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•HR 1186 IH

1 partment plans to mitigate the operational impacts 

2 of the delay. 

3 ‘‘(11) Whether the Department has issued a 

4 stop-work order or suspension-of-work order on any 

5 component or subset of the project, the expected du6 ration of any such order, and the justification for 

7 any such order.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
###### Editorial Note on Part 1955

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1955 appear at 80 FR 9895, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1955.121 Sale of acquired chattels (chattel).

Sections 1955.122 through 1955.124 of this subpart prescribe procedures for the sale of all acquired chattel property except real property rights. The State Director is authorized to sell acquired chattels by auction, sealed bid, regular sale or, for perishable items and crops, by negotiated sale. The State Director may redelegate authority to any qualified Rural Development employee.