alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32.2


**CERTIFICATION
      OF DISCLOSURE PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








I,
      XiaoLin Liu, Chief Financial Officer of Greater China Media and Entertainment
      Corp., certify
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as enacted by Section 906 of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March
      31,
      2007 (the "Periodic Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and





(2)
      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Greater China
      Media and Entertainment Corp.





**GREATER
                  CHINA MEDIA AND ENTERTAINMENT CORP.**Date: May21,2007
              By:
              /s/ XiaoLin
                LiuXiaoLin
                LiuTitle Chief
                Financial Officer








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to Greater China Media and Entertainment
      Corp.
      and will
      be
      retained Greater China Media and Entertainment Corp. and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[4910-13-P]

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39 r"

2.0\D-DI'l:J

[Docket No. FAA-..2009-*****; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-187-AD]

ATE •

10/2ejiJ1

LmNGSYMBOL

. RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER) Mo

ERJ 190-100 STD, -100 LR, -100 IGW, -200 STD, -200 LR, and -200 IGW Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

SU1\.fMARY: We propose to adopt a new ainvorthiness directive (AD) for the product AN M- 7

'NmALSIsIG

O\ITING SYMBOL * * * * * * *

Failure to inspect these components according to the new tasks, thresholds

and intervals could prevent a timely detection of fatigue cracks.

Undetected fatigue cracks in these areas could adversely affect the

structural integrity of these airplanes.

condition as:

listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing ainvorthiness

During ERJ 190 airplane full scale fatigue test, cracks were found in some

structural components of the airplane. Analysis of these cracks resulted in

modifications on the airplane Airworthiness Limitation Items (All), to

include new inspections tasks or modification of existing ones and its

respective thresholds and intervals.

and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafi

information (MeAl) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify

rNITIAUVSlG

The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the unsafe conditi n

described in the MeAl.
#### Stevens’ Heirs’s *vs.*Stevens’ Widow.

Motion-

Persons who do not appear, by the record, to have been parties in the court ¡below, and do not show, by proof, that they Ara ¡connected in Interest as heirjs, *429or otherwise, can maintain n® no writ of error, and one sued out in their names, will be quashed.

*428[Mr. Turner for Plaintiffs : Mr. Simpson *contra.]*

From the Madison County Court.

*November 11.*

Judge Underwood

delivered the Opinion of the Court

The Madison Gounty Court, on the motion of the administrators of James Stevens, deceased, appointed commissioners to allot to Elizabeth Stevens, the widow, her dower in the estate.

The commissioners made a very vague report, which the county court *“ordered to he*recorded,” without stating that it was approved or confirmed.

*429Administrators have no authority to procure an , assignment of dower: the widow and heirs are not bound by proceedings upon their motion.

To reverse these proceedings, various persons sue out a writ of error, as plaintiffs, against Elizabeth Stevens, the widow, as defendant. There is no proof that the plaintiffs in error are the heirs of James Stevens, deceased. They are not, upon the face of the record, connected with the proceedings ; and they do not even prosecute their writ of error, in the character of heirs. Presenting themselves in the attitude of strangers, and showing no interest whatever, the writ of error sued out by them, must be quashetl. It is not perceived how they can be prejudiced, if they are in truth the heirs of James Stevens, deceased, by proceedings commencing illegally, and to which they were not parties, .and which the widow seems to be protesting against as well as they.

Administrators have no right, or authority, to apply for the appointment of commissioners to assign dower.

The writ of error is quashed. The defendant in error must recover her costs.
#### James J. Mammoser, Appellant, v. Service Casualty Company of New York et al., Respondents.

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and matter remitted to Erie Supreme Court, Calendar Part, for further proceedings in accordance with the Memorandum. Memorandum: Plaintiff was not present when his case was marked settled and stricken from the Trial *974Calendar. The record does not show whether or not his attorney or his parents, who were then present, had authority to settle the case for him. A hearing should be had at which the parties will have an opportunity to present proof on the issue of the validity of the settlement agreement and plaintiff's right to annul it. Calendar Part may then determine the motion on the present record as supplemented by the proceedings at the hearing. (Appeal from order of Erie Trial Term denying motion to restore action to Trial Calendar.) Present — Williams, P. J., Goldman, Henry, Del Vecchio and Harsh, JJ.
(April 26, 1967)

(Republished)

#### In the Matter of Sidney J. Ungar, an Attorney.

Respondent’s motion for reconsideration is denied. The motion is grounded on *Spevack*v. *Klein*(385 U. S. 511). Respondent expressly abandoned his reliance on his Federal privilege against self incrimination (U. S. Const., 5th Amdt.). He did not raise the question in the Court of Appeals but did on his application for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court. *Spevaek*prohibits a waiver of the privilege under the compulsion of the threat of loss of employment. It does not inhibit the use in a disciplinary proceeding of testimony resulting from respondent’s immunity from prosecution therefor. The Fifth Amendment proscribes compelled testimony in “ any criminal case ”, Although forfeiture proceedings have been held to be in the nature of criminal proceedings *(Plymouth Sedan*v. *Pennsylvania,*380 U. S. 693), it has not been held that a disciplinary proceeding is in the nature of a criminal cause. The constitutional question respondent belatedly seeks to revive does not affect the charges based on the contempt adjudication against the respondent *(Ungar*v. *Sarafite,*376 U. S. 575) and respondent’s contumacious conduct in the trial of *People*v. *Jack*(12 N Y 2d 721) heretofore sustained *(Matter of Ungar,*25 A D 2d 322, app. dsmd. 18 N Y 2d 690, cert. den. 385 U. S. 1006), and are sufficient to warrant disbarment. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
#### § 1780.63 Sewage treatment and bulk water sales contracts.

Owners entering into agreements with private or public parties to treat sewage or supply bulk water shall have written contracts for such service and all such contracts shall be subject to the Agency concurrence. Section 1780.62 should be used as a guide to prepare such contracts.
#### § 22.305 Conformance with OMB Circular No. A-95.

The State and multicounty jurisdictional rural development planning process must conform to the review requirements expressed in OMB Circular No. A-95 under parts I, III, and IV as appropriate.
Casualty Losses – Document List

Make Disaster Tax Relief Filing Easy

If you need assistance in preparing your returns, the IRS will help you.

If you are able to provide any of the following information, it will assist the IRS in ca

your casualty loss:

● Complete list of personal and non-real

estate items lost in the disaster.

Publication 584, Casualty, Disaster, and

Theft Loss Workbook (Personal-Use

Property) and Publication 584-B, Business

Casualty, Disaster, and Theft Loss

Workbook, will assist you in compiling

these items. You may also use the lists

prepared by FEMA and add the additional

Fair Market Value information.

● All types of Federal Emergenc

Management Agency’s reimbu

documentation, if applicable.

● If available, bring copies of your federal tax

returns for the last three years.

● If you claimed a casualty loss on your last

year’s return or any prior year return,

please bring a copy of the amended

returns or any other documentation, if

available.

● Insurance reimbursement documentation, if

applicable.

● All Small Business Administrat

appraisals, if applicable.

● The fair market value of your h

real estate before the casualty

● Any contractor estimates and 

replacement costs to damage

● If you previously elected the s

deduction, bring copies of you

tax withholding, real property 

personal property, home mort

and charitable contributions p

prior year.

Securing copies of previously filed returns, providing Form W-2 or Form 1099 data, 

current year return processing, expediting issuance of replacement checks, delaying 

and waiving penalties are also helpful services the IRS can provide, if needed.

Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service

IRS

Publication 3932 (Rev. 12-2005)

Catalog Number 32903Y

www.irs.gov
###### Editorial Note on Part 1944

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1944 appear at 80 FR 9885, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1944.543 Grant monitoring.

Each grant will be monitored by Rural Development to ensure that the grantee is complying with the terms of the grant and that the TSA project activity is completed as approved. Ordinarily, this will involve a review of quarterly and final reports by Rural Development and review by the appropriate District Director.
#### Monsees Tool & Die, Inc., et al., Respondents, v United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, Appellant.

Order and judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Defendant entered into negotiations with plaintiff Monsees Tool & Die, Inc., concerning a claim arising from the negligence of defendant’s insured. An adjuster for defendant and the plaintiffs Friedman & Greenfield, P. C., attorneys for Monsees Tool & Die, Inc., agreed to settle the claim for $11,000. Defendant issued a draft dated January 11, 1979 in that amount payable to Monsees Tool & Die, Inc., and plaintiff attorneys which was indorsed and deposited. On January 15, 1979 defendant’s adjuster discovered that the policy limits for the loss was only $5,000 instead of $15,000 as he originally believed. He notified plaintiff attorneys and defendant issued a stop payment order for the $11,000 draft. Plaintiffs brought this action for summary judgment in lieu of complaint on the draft as an instrument for the payment of money only (CPLR 3213). The sole defense asserted by defendant in opposition to the motion is mutual mistake of fact, i.e., the mistake of its adjuster as to the amount of coverage available. The order granting plaintiffs’ summary judgment is affirmed. Defendant has made no showing that all parties to the transaction were acting under a mistake of fact, only that it was mistaken as to the amount of coverage available. Plaintiffs had no interest in the amount of coverage and no duty to inquire about the limits. Their only purpose was to recover the damages arising from the negligence of defendant’s insured. Special Term erred, however, in relying in part upon plaintiffs’ status as a holder in due course. Subdivision (2) of section 3-305 of the Uniform Commercial Code provides that a holder in due course takes the instrument free from all *823defenses "of any party to the instrument with whom the holder has not dealt”. Upon the facts present in this record, defendant is a party with whom plaintiffs have "dealt” and defendants may assert the defense of mutual mistake. We find only that the defense has no merit. (Appeal from order and judgment of Monroe Supreme Court—summary judgment.) Present—Simons, J. P., Schnepp, Callahan, Doerr and Witmer, JJ.
**EXHIBIT
      23.1**








**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**








Board
      of
      Directors


IR
      BioSciences Holdings, Inc.


Scottsdale,
      Arizona





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of
      IR
      BioSciences Holdings, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-137191 and 333-113511)
      of
      our report dated March 23, 2007 relating to our audit of the consolidated
      financial statements which appear in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which
      is
      incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of IR BioSciences Holdings,
      Inc. for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2006 and the
      period October 22, 2002 (date of inception) through December 31,
      2006.











/s/
      RUSSELL BEDFORD STEFANOU MIRCHANDANI LLP


Russell
      Bedford Stefanou Mirchandani LLP





New
      York,
      New York


April
      17,
      2007
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 222 (Thursday, November 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 70711]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29052]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

[OMB Control No. 3206-0216; Form RI 98-7]

Submission for OMB Review; Extension of a Currently Approved 
Information Collection

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. 
L. 104-13, May 22, 1995), this notice announces that the Office of 
Personnel Management (OPM) has submitted to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) a request for extension of a currently approved 
information collection. ``We Need Important Information About Your 
Eligibility for Social Security Disability Benefits'' (OMB Control No. 
3206-0216; Form RI 98-7), is used by OPM to verify receipt of Social 
Security Administration (SSA) disability benefits, to lessen or avoid 
overpayment to Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) disability 
retirees. It notifies the annuitant of the responsibility to notify OPM 
if SSA benefits begin and the overpayment that will occur with the 
receipt of both benefits.
    Approximately 4,300 RI 98-7 forms will be completed annually. The 
form takes approximately 5 minutes to complete. The annual burden is 
358 hours.
    For copies of this proposal, contact Cyrus S. Benson on (202) 606-
4808, FAX (202) 606-0910 or via e-mail to [email protected]. Please 
include a mailing address with your request.

DATES: Comments on this proposal should be received within 30 calendar 
days from the date of this publication.

ADDRESSES: Send or deliver comments to--James K. Freiert (Acting), 
Deputy Associate Director, Retirement Operations, Retirement Services, 
U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW., Room 3305, 
Washington, DC 20415-3500 and OPM Desk Officer, Office of Information & 
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive 
Office Building, 725 17th Street, NW., Room 10235, Washington, DC 
20503.
    For information regarding administrative coordination contact: 
Cyrus S. Benson, Team Leader, Publications Team, RS/RM/Administrative 
Services, U.S. Office of Personnel Management, 1900 E Street, NW., Room 
4H28, Washington, DC 20415, (202) 606-4808.

John Berry,
Director, U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
[FR Doc. 2010-29052 Filed 11-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-38-P
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 1940

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1940 appear at 80 FR 9876, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1940.969 Forms, exhibits, and subparts.

Forms, exhibits, and subparts of this chapter (all available in any Rural Development office) referenced in this subpart, are for use in establishing a State economic development review panel and for administering the Panel Grant program associated with the panel.
EXHIBIT 10.18



 Exhibit 10.18 
  
 Highland Hospitality Corporation 
 Compensation
for Non-Employee Directors 
  
 Annual Fees

  
 The Chairman of our Board is paid a fee of $250,000 annually.
Each of our directors (other than the Chairman and President and Chief Executive Officer) who does not serve as the chairman of one of our committees is paid a director’s fee of $20,000 annually. Each director who serves as a committee
chairman, other than our Audit Committee chairman, is paid a director’s fee of $25,000 annually. The director who serves as our Audit Committee chairman is paid a director’s fee of $30,000 annually. 
  
 Effective with the completion of our initial public offering, we granted our
Chairman a restricted common stock award for 175,000 shares of restricted common stock, which vest at the rate of one-third of the number of shares of restricted common stock on each of the first three annual anniversary dates of the completion of
our initial public offering. The vesting of those shares of restricted common stock will accelerate if the Chairman’s service as a director terminates for death or disability, by reason of the failure of the Chairman to be re-nominated by our
Board of Directors or re-elected by the stockholders (other than his voluntary withdrawal from the Board or a removal for cause and in accordance with our charter) or by reason of a change in control of our Company. Each of our other directors who
is not an officer or employee received an initial grant of 5,000 vested shares of common stock concurrent with the completion of our initial public offering, received a grant of an additional 2,000 vested shares of common stock at the time of the
meeting of the Board of Directors immediately following our 2004 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and, assuming each continues service on the Board of Directors, will receive a grant of an additional 2,000 vested shares of common stock at the time of
the meetings of the Board of Directors immediately following our 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and each subsequent annual meeting of our stockholders. 
  
 Meeting Fees 
  
 Each director, other than our Chairman and President and Chief Executive Officer, is also paid $1,500 per Board or committee meeting attended (or $500 per
telephonic meeting), except that committee chairpersons are paid $2,500 per committee meeting attended. 
  
 Expenses 
  
 Directors are reimbursed for their reasonable expenses of attending board and committee meetings.
29–008 

108TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 108–618 

WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE 

REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 2443, COAST GUARD MARITIME TRANSPORTATION ACT FOR 2004 

JULY 20, 2004.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. LINCOLN DIAZ-BALART of Florida, from the Committee on 

Rules, submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 730] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 730, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives all points of order against the conference 

report to accompany H.R. 2443, Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation Act of 2004, and against its consideration. Finally, the 

rule provides that the conference report shall be considered as 

read. 

Æ
Office of Adolescent Health | Website: http://www.hhs.gov/ash/oah/TAG @TeenHealthGov Email: TAGTEAM@hhs.gov 

TAG in Action: Michigan Adolescent Health Initiative

As part of its national call to action, Adolescent Health, Think, Act, GrowSM (TAG), the Office of Adolescent 

Health, in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Service has identified a number of successful strategies

for improving adolescent health throughout the country. 

The Goal

The University of Michigan Health System Adolescent Health Initiative (AHI) advances 

innovative approaches to adolescent-centered healthcare through practice improvement, 

education, research, and youth and community engagement. 

The Game 

Plan

AHI’s Adolescent Champion Model gives health care providers a framework to make youthfriendly enhancements to their clinic’s physical space, policies, and practices. The model 

improves the care of adolescent and young adult patients through:

• Comprehensive Adolescent-Centered Environment (ACE) assessments, customized 

implementation plans and robust resources

• Targeted quality improvement initiatives 

• Innovative training and professional development opportunities for all staff 

• Opportunities for Continuing Medical Education (CME) and Maintenance of 

Certification Part IV credits

• Ongoing, personalized technical and capacity-building assistance 

The Adolescent Champion Model was developed after interviews with health care providers 

and staff from across the country revealed that most did not feel equipped or prepared to 

meet the needs of their teen and young adult patients. Many reported that they had not 

been trained on important issues like confidentiality and minor consent or providing 

culturally competent care for transgender and gender nonconforming patients. AHI began

its effort with funding from the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, and 

was met by an overwhelming demand. The success of the ACE assessment process and 

Adolescent Champion model quickly spread across Michigan and has recently expanded to 

other states including Iowa, Mississippi, and Wisconsin, with plans for further rollout.

The 

Winning 

Plays

The Adolescent Health Initiative involved their teen advisory council in development of the 

Adolescent Champion model, which lent credibility and youth perspective. For example, 

young people made clear that anyone can make or break their experience in a healthcare 

setting so the model’s training and capacity building framework involves everyone– 

physicians, call center staff, front desk staff, nurses, administrators, etc. Lauren Ranalli, AHI 

Director, shared that “Teens are often a forgotten population, and health centers aren’t 

necessarily set up to meet their specific needs. We are looking at transforming primary care 

and school-based health centers into adolescent-centered medical homes, and this involves 

everyone from the person who answers the phone to the provider who treats them.”

Learn 

More 

Adolescent Health Initiative

University of Michigan Health System

http://umhs-adolescenthealth.org/