alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          34,215
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  205,225
<ALLOWANCES>                                    22,096
<INVENTORY>                                     51,766
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               332,873
<PP&E>                                          46,599
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,665
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,114,248
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          131,285
<BONDS>                                        427,889
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           876
<OTHER-SE>                                     528,002
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,114,248
<SALES>                                        652,179
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               652,179
<CGS>                                          355,577
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  355,577
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                10,809
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,483
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 45,689
<INCOME-TAX>                                    18,992
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             26,687
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,697
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 1948
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1948 appear at 80 FR 9888, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1948.81 State Investment Strategy for Energy Impacted Areas. ( a ) The State Investment Strategy for Energy Impacted Areas should be a dynamic document updated as each plan or group of plans is submitted to Rural Development for approval.
( b ) The Governor shall consult with the Rural Development State Director when developing or updating a State Investment Strategy for Energy Impacted Areas.
( c ) The State Investment Strategy for Energy Impacted Areas will include but is not limited to: ( 1 ) A list of projects in order of priority;
( 2 ) The Governor's recommended level of and method of funding for each project through completion of the project identified in the plans submitted and incorporated into the State Investment Strategy for Energy Impacted Areas;
( 3 ) Methods of coordinating assistance with other State and Federal development programs;
( 4 ) The differential between available financial resources and the cost of needed site development and acquisition for housing and public facilities and services within the area covered by the State Investment Strategy for Energy Impacted Areas;
( 5 ) References to plan and page number of plan on which each priority project is described.
( d ) The State Investment Strategy for Energy Impacted Areas having projects expected to be funded in FY 1979 should be submitted to the Rural Development State Director of the appropriate State before July 15, 1979. A copy should also be forwarded to the Under Secretary for Rural Development.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with this Quarterly  Report of Morgan Creek Energy Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2009, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Peter Wilson,  President/Chief Executive Officer and I, William D. Thomas, Chief
Financial  Officer,  of the  Company,  certify  to the  best  of our  knowledge,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  Sec.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to Sec.  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Dated: November 12, 2009

                                       /s/ PETER WILSON
                                       _________________________________________
                                           Peter Wilson
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer



Dated: November 12, 2009

                                      /s/ WILLIAM D. THOMAS
                                       _________________________________________
                                           William D. Thomas
                                           Chief Financial Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Notes:

1. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 83 FR 22178, May 14, 2018.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 83 FR 61310, Nov. 29, 2018

3. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 85 FR 65504, Oct. 15, 2020.

4. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 87 FR 44266, July 26, 2022.

#### § 2.600 Deputy Under Secretary for Trade and Foreign Agricultural Affairs.

Pursuant to § 2.15(a), subject to reservations in § 2.15(b), and subject to policy guidance and direction by the Under Secretary, the following delegation of authority is made to the Deputy Under Secretary for Trade and Foreign Agricultural Affairs, if appointed, to be exercised only during the absence or unavailability of the Under Secretary: Perform all the duties and exercise all the powers which are now or which may hereafter be delegated to the Under Secretary for Trade and Foreign Agricultural Affairs: Provided, that this authority shall be exercised by the respective Deputy Under Secretary in the order in which he or she has taken office as a Deputy Under Secretary.

[87 FR 44272, July 26, 2022]
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1413.101 Applicability. ( a ) This subpart establishes the terms and conditions under which the Durum Wheat Quality Program (DWQP) as authorized by section 1613 of the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 (Pub. L. 110-246) will be administered.
( b ) This program will operate only to the extent appropriated funding is available.
( c ) Subject to available funding, eligible producers of durum wheat will be partially compensated for the cost of purchasing and applying fungicides to a crop of durum wheat to control Fusarium head blight on acres accurately certified as planted to durum wheat. “Available funding” requires that there be a specific appropriation for the program that applies to a particular crop for which the producer seeks compensation under this program.
#### West vs. Hart, &c.

Covenant. Caso 79.

Error to the Mason Circuit; Roper, Judge.

Lease, *covenant in. Covenant to keep in repair.*

Covenant “to keep the larm and buildings in good repair and leave them in thBorder at tlie° end of said term .f tliree veiry^ does not.-bind the tyn'ant, either to put or leave the promises in be(ter repair thdn they were at date of the covenant.

April 24.

Judge Nicholas

delivered the opinion of the c.'urt.

This case depends upon the construe" tion to be given to the following covenant in alease: “To keep the farm and buildings in good repair, and leave them in the same good order, at the end of said term of three years.”

It is contended in behalf of plaintiff in error, that this covenant bound the defendants to put the farm and buildings in good repair, and to leave them in actual good repair at the end of the lease, without reference to their condition at the date of the lease. We have been referred to the case of Brashear vs. Chandler, VI. Mon. 150, as ruling this to be the true construction: That caséis not like this. There, the covenant was, to *deliver*the farm, at the end of the lease, *in good tenantable repair in every*respect, and it was properly construed into a stipulation for putting the farm into repair, whatever its situation might have been when rented. It is said in that case, that, a covenant simply to repair, may be construed to embrace only the making good what may be damaged, *ad*interim, but that the stipulation to deliver in good repair in *every*respect, left no room for limiting it into a covenant merely to repair, according to the original condition of the farm The word keep, seems to us, to have direct reference to the condition of fhe premises at the time of the lease, and that the then state of repair must be taken to be, what the parties meant by good repair. There is so broad and palpable a distinction, between a promise, *to put*into repair, and one to *keep*in repair, that it is almost impossible to believe the parties meant the former, when they used the latter expression. A covenant to *keep in repair,*is certain*259iy no broader than a covenant to repair, ancl if the latter obliges only to make good the damage *ad interim,*no greater stress can be laid on the promise keep in repair.

*Triplett*and tiord, for plaintiff; *Monhead*and Brown, for defendants.

The last clause *lo leave m the same good*order,” gives no aid to the construction, one way or the other. Its obvious meaning is, that the- premises were to be *left*as they *had to be kept.*

The court below gave the same construction to the covenant that we have done. Wherefore, judgment affirmed with costs.
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Research Frontiers Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph M. Harary, President and Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Joseph M. Harary Joseph M. Harary President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer
March 11, 2011




---
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


          We have issued our reports dated May 11, 1999, accompanying the
consolidated financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of
Kent Electronics Corporation and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended
April 3, 1999.  We do hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said
reports in the Registration Statements of Kent Electronics Corporation on Form
S-8, File Nos. 33-12028, 33-17821, 33-18527, 33-66030, and 333-20367.



GRANT THORNTON LLP


Houston, Texas
June 23, 1999
§ 1752.16 Transfer of collateral and assumption of debt. A transfer of collateral and assumption of debt may be approved subject to the conditions set forth in this section. In order to request assistance under this section, the Borrower must make a showing that the transfer of collateral and assumption of debt will improve the likelihood that the government will be repaid and maximize the Agency's recovery on such loans. Such actions will be subject to the following requirements: ( a ) The transfer will not be disadvantageous to the Government, as determined by RUS;
( b ) The Agency has concurred to plans for disposition of funds in any reserve account, including project construction bank accounts;
( c ) The transferee will assume all of the Borrower's responsibilities regarding the loan(s) and will accept the original loan conditions, as well as any others that may be imposed by the Agency;
( d ) There must be no lien, judgement, or similar claims of other parties against the loan collateral being transferred, and once transferred, such collateral may not be subject to the lien, judgement, or similar claims of other parties of the transferee;
( e ) Title to all assets must be conveyed to the transferee; and
( f ) The Borrower will comply with such other conditions as may be imposed by the Agency on a case-by-case basis, as determined by RUS.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than November 30, 2010.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:

                    1.                     *Fred Diefenbaugh,*                     Huntington, Indiana; to retain control of the voting shares of Bippus State Corporation, and thereby indirectly retain control of Bippus State Bank, both of Huntington, Indiana.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, November 10, 2010.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-28757 Filed 11-15-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### § 1786.59 Loan fund audit.

Within 6 months of closing RUS shall have the right to audit transactions involving the RUS construction fund established and maintained by the borrower pursuant to the terms of the RUS Loan Agreement and to inspect all books, records, accounts and other documents and papers of the borrower. Should RUS determine that the borrower has made disbursements of funds advanced pursuant to RUS Notes which do not comply with the requirements of the RUS Loan Agreement, the borrower shall be required to pay to the Government an amount equal to the difference between the amount which the borrower prepaid on such RUS Notes evidencing RUS loan funds which were improperly disbursed and the amount which the borrower would otherwise have been required to return to the Government as a result of noncompliance if the borrower had not prepaid such RUS Notes. (See 7 CFR part 1721)
#### § 202.41 Notice and hearing prior to promulgation of rules and regulations.

Prior to the promulgation of any rule or regulation contemplated by section 402 of the Act (7 U.S.C. 1592), notice shall be given by publication in the Federal Register of intention to promulgate such rule or regulation and of the time and place of a public hearing to be held with reference thereto. Such hearings shall be conducted by the Director or by such employee or employees of the Department of Agriculture as may be designated to preside thereat, except that hearings with respect to rules or regulations contemplated by section 402(b) of the Act relating to title III of the Act (Foreign Commerce), shall be conducted by the Secretary of the Treasury and the Secretary of Agriculture, acting jointly or separately, or by such employee or employees of the Department of Agriculture or the Department of the Treasury as may be designated to preside thereat. The presiding officer shall conduct the hearing in an orderly and informal manner, according to such procedure as he may announce at the commencement of the hearing. Any rule or regulation promulgated under section 402 of the Act shall become effective on the date fixed in the promulgation, which date shall be not less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. Any rule or regulation may be amended or revoked in the same manner as is provided for its promulgation.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 26, 2009 

s1019 

Order 

 

October 26, 2009 

138762 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138762 

 COA: 288056 

Wayne CC: 04-006941 

PAUL ANTHONY DAVIS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 27, 2009 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
**Exhibit31.2**

 

I,Wayne W. Roumagoux, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this amendment to the annual report on Form 10-K/A (AmendmentNo. 2) of M. L. Macadamia Orchards, L.P.;

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal in the case of an annual report) thathas materially affected, or is likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls overfinancial reporting.

 

 
| Date:                    | November  13, 2007 |
|--------------------------|--------------------|
|                     |
| /s/  Wayne W. Roumagoux  |               |
|                     |
| Wayne  W. Roumagoux      |
| Chief  Financial Officer |
|                          |                    |  |

 

----