alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Harry Meyer, Appellant, v. Ford Motor Company, Respondent. Harry Meyer, Appellant, v. Russell Kuzmack, Respondent.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered March 2, 1966, the sole decretal provisions of which are in favor of defendant Ford Motor Company against plaintiff, affirmed, without costs. Appeals, insofar as taken by notices of appeal which state they are from (1) a portion of said judgment which dismissed the complaint as to defendant Kuzmack at the end of plaintiff’s case and (2) an order of said court entered April 18, 1966, dismissed, without costs. Plaintiff was injured when defendant Kuzmack’s car, in which plaintiff was a passenger, suddenly left the road and struck a stone wall. We find no error in the court’s dismissal, at the end of the entire ease, of plaintiff’s claim against defendant Ford for negligent manufacture, or in the jury’s verdict in favor of said defendant upon plaintiff’s claim against it for breach of warranty. We accordingly affirm the judgment as to defendant Ford. As to the appeal from the “ order ” entered April 18, 1966, supposedly made upon a decision dated April 11, 1966, denying plaintiff’s motion to set aside the verdict in defendant Ford’s favor, no order was entered or made upon the decision. Ho appeal lies from a decision. As to defendant Kuzmack, were the judgment against him, we would reverse it as to him and order a new trial on the authority of *Pfaffenbach*v. *White Plains Express Corp.*(17 N Y 2d 132). 'Such, however, is not the case. The complaint was dismissed as to Kuzmack at the end of plaintiff’s case and, although such dismissal is included in the preliminary recitals in the judgment, there are no decretal provisions in Kuzmack’s favor in the judgment. Hence, with respect to Kuzmack, an appeal from the judgment does not properly lie. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
EX-4.1



 Exhibit 4.1 

 
 




 
 NUMBER TC SHARES TRISTATE CAPITAL HOLDINGS, INC. INCORPRATED
UNDER THE LAWS OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNYSLVANIA COMMON STOCK THIS CERTIFES that CUSIP 89678F 10 00 SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS SPECIMEN is the owner of FULLY PAIN AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK, WITHOUT PAT VALUE OF
TRISTATE CAPITAL HOLDINGS, INC. Transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. This Certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer
Agent ad registered by the Registrar. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by the facsimile signatures of its duly DATED: JAMES BAUERLE, SECRETARY JAMES GETZ, CHAIRMAN AND CEO BY COUNTERSIGNED AND
REGISTERED REGISTRAR AND TRANSFER AND TRANSFER COMPANY TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE TRISTATE CAPITAL HOLDINGS, INC. 2006 PENNSYLVANIA M. BURR KEIM, PHILA. LITHO #N U.S.A 







 



 
 The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this
certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: UNIF GIFT WIN ACT- Custodian (Cust) (Minor) under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act (State) Additional abbreviations may also be used
though not in the above list. TEN COM - as tenants in common TEN ENT - as tenants by the entireties JT TEN - as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common For Value Received, PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER
IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE hereby sell, assign and transfer unto (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE) Shares of the Common Stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably
constitute and appoint, , Attorney to transfer the said Shares on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: X. , THE SIGNATURE(S) TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME(S) AS WRITTEN
UPON THE FACE OF THIS CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER. Signature(s) Guaranteed BY: THE SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE GUARANTEED BY AM ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND
LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
#### § 1786.200 Purpose.

This subpart sets forth the policies and procedures of RUS through the existing FFB program, whereby borrowers may prepay and refinance, outstanding FFB Notes evidencing electric or telephone loans with FFB, pursuant to the provisions of section 306(C) of the RE Act as added by Public Law 103-66, 107 Stat. 312, enacted August 10, 1993.
2006-0661.

#### St. John v. Jeffreys.

In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of William St. John. Sua sponte, cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

T.M. AND BRENDA TINKHAM

v.

JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.;JOHNSON & JOHNSON; JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT, LLC; AND EXCERPTA MEDICA, INC.;AND ELSEVIER

INC.

PETITION OF: JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON; JANSSEN RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT, LLC :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 525 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 16th day of March, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
#### Prewit *vs.*Walker.

Trespass., Case 10S,

Error to ihe Mercer Circuit; Kellst Judge.

*Justification by sheriff under fieri facias. Statute exempting property from execution. Pleading. Trial of right oj property by jury.*

May *5.*

Chief Justice Robertson

delivered the Opinion of tbeCourt;

Peewit sued Waller in trespass for taking and converting a horse.

Walker justified as a deputy sheriff — averred that he levied a fieri facias (in his hands against Prewit) on the horse — that it was subject to the execution— and that a jury, einpannelled to try the right of property, having deciaed that the horse was subject to the execution, he sold it in virtue of the process.

Prewit replied that he was, at the date of the levy, a fanner by occupation and a *bona fide*housekeeper, and that the horse which Walker had sold was his *only '■'■work beast.”*

A demurrer to the replication having been sustained, andPrewit having failed to plead over, judgment was rendered in bar of his action. To reverse tiiat judgment this writ of error is prosecuted.

If the replication had contained such averments as to show that tiie horse was exempt from execution, it would have been good; for the statute of this state regulating the trial of the right of property, under execution, applies only to a case in which a stranger to the process claims the property; and according to the common law, such a verdict ¿as that *333set forth in the plea filled by Walker, could not have justified his sale of the horse.

that the horse levied on and sold by sheriff was his “only work beast” not good answer to justification for taking and selling in virtue of *fieri facú as*vs. plaintiff in trespass. It should aver that he was “an actual *ionafi.de*house Keeper with a family.

Harlan,"for plaintiff; Cunningham, for defendant.

But the replication does not show that Prewit had a family — and the statute of *1828*(session acts *151,)*which exempts certain kinds of property from execution, declares that its provisions “shall not be construed to extend to any but actual bona fide housekeepers *with a family.”*Therefore the replication it insufficient.

The plea is, in our opinion, substantially good. It sufficiently avers, we think, that the horse was taken in virtue of the execution and whilst it was in full force.

Wherefore, the judgment of. the circuit court is right, and must be affirmed.
#### § 1773.40 Regulatory assets.

The auditor's audit documentation shall support that the auditor tested whether all regulatory assets comply with the requirements of ASC 980. For Electric auditees only, the auditor's audit documentation shall support that all regulatory assets have received RUS approval.
§ 1777.31 Individual loan and grant eligibility. ( a ) When loan awards are made by RUS to individuals, the individuals must meet the applicable requirements of paragraphs (a)(1) through (5) of this section: ( 1 ) Must demonstrate adequate ability to repay the loan;
( 2 ) Have an ownership interest in the dwelling to be improved or connected to the system, and the dwelling must be located in an eligible, rural area;
( 3 ) At the time of loan approval, the household's 12-month adjusted income must not be more than the statewide nonmetro median household income for the state or territory in which the individual resides, according to the most recent decennial census. Adjusted income is used to determine program eligibility and the amount of payment subsidy for which the household qualifies. Adjusted income is annual income less any of the following deductions for which the household is eligible: ( i ) For each household member, except the head of household or spouse, who is under 18 years of age, 18 years of age or older with a disability, or a full-time student, the amount determined pursuant to section 501(b)(5) of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended.
( ii ) A deduction of reasonable expenses for the care of minor 12 years of age or under that: ( A ) Enable a family member to work or to further a member's education;
( B ) Are not reimbursed or paid by another source; and
( C ) In the case of expenses to enable a family member to work do not exceed the amount of income earned by the family member enabled to work.
( iii ) Expenses related to the care of household members with disabilities that: ( A ) Enable a family member to work;
( B ) Are not reimbursed from insurance or another source; and
( C ) Are in excess of three percent of the household's annual income.
( iv ) For any elderly family, a deduction in the amount determined pursuant to section 501(b)(5) of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended.
( v ) For elderly households only, a deduction for household medical expenses that are not reimbursed from insurance or another source and which in combination with any expenses related to the care of household members with disabilities described in paragraph (a)(3)(iii) of this section, are in excess of three percent of the household's annual income;
( 4 ) Must not be delinquent on any Federal debt; and,
( 5 ) Are unable to pay for the costs of improvements without the loan.
( b ) Grants may be made to individuals who meet all applicable requirements of paragraphs (b)(1) through (4) of this section: ( 1 ) Have an ownership interest in the dwelling to be connected to the system or improved and located in an eligible, rural area;
( 2 ) At the time of grant approval, meet the income requirements established within item (a)(3) of this part;
( 3 ) Must not be delinquent on any Federal debt; and
( 4 ) Are unable to pay for the costs of improvements without a grant.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

Eachof the undersigned hereby certifies, for the purposes of section 1350 ofchapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his capacity as anofficer of Bidz.com, Inc. (“Bidz.com”), that, to his knowledge, theQuarterly Report of Bidz.com on Form 10-Q for the period endedSeptember 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that theinformation contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operation of Bidz.com.

 
| Date:  November 8,  2010 | By     | /s/  David Zinberg       |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------|
|                                    |   | David  Zinberg           |
|                                    |   | Chief  Executive Officer |
|                                    |   |                     |
| Date:  November 8,  2010 | By     | /s/  Lawrence Kong       |
|                                    |   | Lawrence  Kong           |
|                                    |   | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

1

----
Huntingdon Life Sciences 00-6127 Page 1077 211-EtOH-S Final Report

Animal Exposure and Animal Data

Preface Appendix 3

INTRODUCTION: The following is data generated at Huntingdon Life Sciences, East Millstone, NJ. The separately issued main study report should be referenced for details of the procedures used for test atmosphere generation/characterization and animal

evaluations.

STUDY DATES: Date of Animal Receipt: 5 April 2001

Experimental Initiation Date: 19 April 2001 (in-life)

Experimental Completion Date: 17 May 2001 (in-life)

EXPOSURES AND IN-LIFE SUMMARY: The actual measured results during the exposures were comparable to the targetedexposure levels. There were no exposurerelated effects seen in the test animals with regards to body weights and feed consumption.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLES

A. Chamber Monito ring Results...................................................................................1078

B. Summary of Clinical Observ ations (pretest only) ...................................................1086

C. Mean Body Weights (grams)...................................................................................1088

D. Mean Body Weight Change (grams) .......................................................................1090

E. Mean Feed Consumption Va lues (grams/kg/day) ...................................................1092

F. Individual Clinical Observ ations (pretest only).......................................................1094

G. Individual Body Wei ghts (grams)............................................................................1104

H. Individual Body Weight Change (grams)................................................................1114

I. Individual Feed Consumption Values (grams/kg/day) ............................................1124

J. Animal Termina tion History....................................................................................1134
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,256,842
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,326,793
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (203,657)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      62,508,321
<DEPRECIATION>                            (26,899,633)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              40,048,693
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     18,981,387
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                40,048,693
<SALES>                                      8,985,277
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,275,514
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,299,931
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,671,325
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (695,742)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (695,742)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 1951

#### Editorial Notes:

1. Some of the exhibits referenced in this part 1951 are not published in the Code of Federal Regulations. Exhibits are available in any Rural Development office.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 1951 appear at 80 FR 9890-9894, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1951.2 Policy.

Borrowers are expected to pay their debts to the Agency in accordance with their agreements and ability to pay. They will be encouraged to pay ahead of schedule, consistent with sound financial management. When borrowers have acted in good faith and have exercised due diligence in an effort to pay their indebtedness but cannot pay on schedule because of circumstances beyond their control, servicing actions will be consistent with the best interests of the borrower and the Government. It is the policy of this agency to service borrower loan account without regard to race, color, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, age, physical or mental handicap (borrower must possess the capacity to enter into a legal contract for services).
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Anthony M. Palma, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Easton-Bell Sports, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: November 14, 2006 /s/ Anthony M. Palma   Anthony M. Palma   Chief Executive Officer
§ 1734.40 Use of loan funds. A loan may be used by eligible organizations as defined in § 1734.4 for distance learning and telemedicine projects to finance 100 percent of the cost of approved purposes contained in § 1734.41 provided that no financial assistance may exceed the maximum amount for the year in which the loan is made. Entities seeking a loan must be able to provide security and execute a note with a maturity period greater than one year. The following entities are eligible for loans under this subpart: ( a ) Organizations as defined in § 1734.4. If a RUS Telecommunications Borrower is seeking a loan, the borrower does not need to submit all of the financial security information required by § 1734.44(d). The borrower's latest financial report (Form 479) filed with RUS and any additional information relevant to the project, as determined by RUS, will suffice;
( b ) Any non-profit or for-profit entity, public or private entity, urban or rural institution, or rural educational broadcaster, which proposes to provide and receive distance learning and telemedicine services to carry out the purposes of this subpart; or
( c ) Any entity that contracts with an eligible organization in paragraphs (a) or (b) of this section for constructing distance learning or telemedicine facilities for the purposes contained in § 1734.41, except for those purposes in § 1734.41(h).
( d ) Applicants must meet the minimum eligibility requirement for determining the extent to which the project serves rural areas as contained in § 1734.26(b)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 21-0168

DEPOSITORS INSURANCE COMPANY,

 Plaintiff and Appellee,

and SARA THARP,

 Plaintiff and Cross-Appellant,

 v.

PATRICK SANDIDGE,

 Defendant and Appellant.

SECOND ORDER 

OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

Andres Nicholas Haladay, the mediator previously appointed in this matter, has 

notified the Court that he declines the appointment. Accordingly, Mr. Haladay’s order of 

mediator appointment is hereby rescinded and

IT IS ORDERED THAT David L. Nielsen, whose name appears next on the list of

attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for money judgment appeals which is maintained 

pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the mediation process 

required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 7(5)(d) 

shall run from the date of this order of appointment.

A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to the 

parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof.

DATED this 4

th day of June, 2021.

Bowen Greenwood, Clerk of the Supreme Court

C: Stephanie A. Hollar, Paul Robert Haffeman, Geoffrey C. Angel,

Scott George Gratton, Adam Michael Shaw, Andres Nicholas Haladay,

And David L. Nielsen

06/04/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0230