alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 1955
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1955 appear at 80 FR 9895, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1955.145 Land acquisition to effect sale. The State Director is authorized to acquire land which is necessary to effect sale of inventory real property. This action must be considered only on a case-by-case basis and may not be undertaken primarily to increase the financial return to the Government through speculation. The State Director's authority under this section may *not* be redelegated. For MFH and other organization-type loans, prior approval must be obtained from the appropriate Assistant Administrator prior to land acquisition. ( a ) *Alternate site.* Where real property has been determined to be NP due to location and where it is economically feasible to relocate the structure thereby making it a program property, the State Director may authorize the acquisition of a suitable parcel of land to relocate the structure if economically feasible. The remaining NP parcel of land will be sold for its market value.
( b ) *Additional land.* Where real property has been determined NP for reasons that may be cured by the acquisition of adjacent land or an alternate site, in order to cure title defects or encroachments or where structures have been built on the wrong land *and* where it is economically feasible, the State Director may authorize the acquisition of additional land at a price not in excess of its market value.
( c ) *Easements or rights-of-way.* The State Director may authorize the acquisition of easements, rights-of-way or other interests in land to cure title defects, encroachments or in order to make NP property a program property, if economically feasible.
[53 FR 27839, July 25, 1988]
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Notes:

1. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 83 FR 22178, May 14, 2018.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 83 FR 61310, Nov. 29, 2018

3. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 85 FR 65504, Oct. 15, 2020.

4. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 87 FR 44266, July 26, 2022.

#### § 2.8 Delegations of authority to agency heads to order that the United States flag be flown at half-staff.

Pursuant to section 5 of Proclamation 3044, 3 CFR, 1954-1958 Comp., p. 4, each general officer and agency head is delegated authority to order that the United States flag shall be flown at half-staff on buildings and grounds under his or her jurisdiction or control. This authority shall be exercised in accordance with directives promulgated by the Director, Office of Operations.
<XBRL>
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<!--XBRL Document Created with Wdesk from Workiva-->
<!--Copyright 2023 Workiva-->
<!--r:1f316285-ddbb-4c43-875e-26be25e9ef4a,g:f5f7cbda-7eaf-440d-a41e-971b1186fd97-->
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:link="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/linkbase" xmlns:ndsn="http://www.nordson.com/20230228" attributeFormDefault="unqualified" elementFormDefault="qualified" targetNamespace="http://www.nordson.com/20230228">
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xlink-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/instance" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xbrl-instance-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/linkbase" schemaLocation="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/xbrl-linkbase-2003-12-31.xsd"/>
  <xs:import namespace="http://xbrl.sec.gov/dei/2022" schemaLocation="https://xbrl.sec.gov/dei/2022/dei-2022.xsd"/>
  <xs:annotation>
    <xs:appinfo>
      <link:linkbaseRef xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:arcrole="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/properties/linkbase" xlink:href="ndsn-20230228_lab.xml" xlink:role="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/labelLinkbaseRef" xlink:type="simple"/>
      <link:linkbaseRef xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:arcrole="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink/properties/linkbase" xlink:href="ndsn-20230228_pre.xml" xlink:role="http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationLinkbaseRef" xlink:type="simple"/>
      <link:roleType id="Cover" roleURI="http://www.nordson.com/role/Cover">
        <link:definition>0000001 - Document - Cover</link:definition>
        <link:usedOn>link:presentationLink</link:usedOn>
        <link:usedOn>link:calculationLink</link:usedOn>
        <link:usedOn>link:definitionLink</link:usedOn>
      </link:roleType>
    </xs:appinfo>
  </xs:annotation>
</xs:schema>
</XBRL>
98-1432.

#### State v. Hoover.

Franklin App. No. 97APA10-1399. *Sua sponte,*cause consolidated with 98-1844, *supra,*and held for the decision in 97-1985, *State v. Cook,*Allen App. No. 1-97-21; briefing schedule stayed.
#### § 220.19 Suspension, termination and grant closeout procedures.

Whenever it is determined that a State agency has materially failed to comply with the provisions of this part, or with FNS guidelines and instructions, FNS may suspend or terminate the Program in whole, or in part, or take any other action as may be available and appropriate. A State agency may also terminate the Program by mutual agreement with FNS. FNS and the State agency shall comply with the provisions of 2 CFR part 200, subpart D and USDA implementing regulations 2 CFR part 400 subparts B and D and USDA implementing regulations 2 CFR part 400 and part 415 concerning grant suspension, termination and closeout procedures. Furthermore, the State agency or FNSRO were applicable, shall apply these provisions to suspension or termination of the Program in School Food Authorities.

[Amdt. 49, 49 FR 18988, May 4, 1984, as amended at 71 FR 39517, July 13, 2006. Redesignated at 72 FR 61495, Oct. 31, 2007, as amended at 81 FR 66491, Sept. 28, 2016]
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

ANTHONY-ERIC EMERSON, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 17-0582 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2010-138001-001

 CR2010-139292-001

The Honorable Karen L. O’Connor, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED AND RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix

By Diane Meloche

Counsel for Respondent

Anthony-Eric Emerson, Tucson

Petitioner

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Randall M. Howe, Judge Kenton D. Jones, and Judge James 

B. Morse Jr. delivered the decision of the Court.

FILED 2-1-2018
STATE v. EMERSON

Decision of the Court

2

PER CURIAM: 

¶1 Petitioner Anthony-Eric Emerson seeks review of the superior 

court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant 

to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is petitioner’s second 

petition.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will 

not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief. 

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to 

show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition 

for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 

2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition 

for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of 

discretion. 

¶4 For the foregoing reasons, we grant review and deny relief.
Exhibit 32.2





Certification


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Joseph P. Kelley, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of Nordson Corporation, an Ohio corporation (the “ Company ”), do hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge:


1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2023 of the Company (the “ Form 10-Q ”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2. Information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: February 23, 2023/s/ Joseph P. KelleyJoseph P. KelleyExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**  I, Thomas Deery, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Dirt Motor Sports, Inc. 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this annual report is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresas of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the“Evaluation Date”); andc) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls whichcould adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any materialweaknesses in internal controls; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly reportwhether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors thatcould significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recentevaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses.     Date:November 2, 2006 /s/ Thomas Deery Thomas Deery,    Chief Executive Officer and President  
56
**EXHIBIT 31.2****Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**I, Bradley Bertouille, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Standard Aero Holdings, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present inall material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by the reportbased on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.   Dated: August 24, 2005     /s/ Bradley Bertouille     Bradley Bertouille  Chief Financial Officer
Design Line 13 - Loss Adjustment Calculations

KVA 1500 1500 1500

Voltage 12470-480Y 25000-480Y 34500-480Y

BIL (kv) 95/10 125/10 150/10

DL DL12 DL12 DL13

Core Const M4 MITER M4 MITER H1/M3 MITER M4 MITER H1/M3 MITER H0-DR

Construction Round (disk) Round (disk) Round (disk)

Efficiency Level EL2

Current DOE Level 99.12% 99.09% 99.09% 99.09% 99.09%

DOE Efficiency 99.30% ? ?

Max DOE watts 5287

Impedance 5.75% 5.75% 5.75%

NL (W) 2709 3853 3211 4546 3788 3476

FL (W) (50%, 75 C) 2540 2329 2329 2272 2272 2272

Total W 5249 6182 5540 6818 6060 5748

Watss Change to EL2 17.77% 5.54% 29.89% 15.46% 9.51%

Calc Efficiency 99.30% 99.18% 99.10% 99.20%

Conductor Weight 1344 1226 1230

Core Weight 6308 8805 10489

Conductor AL AL AL

Primary A/si 600 598 586

Secondary A/si 820 821 784

Flux (KL) 89.1 89.8 89.4

Flux (KG) 13.81395349 13.92248062 13.86046512

090000648113122b.xlsx 10/2/2012

Coil Length (in) 54 59 65

Core Height 57 62 68

End Margin 5.5 8 10

Coil OD 22.125 25.75 27.5

Core Height (in) 77 84 92

High Low 1.3125 2.12 2.8

Primary Mean Turn 62.2 71.6 76.9

Summary

According to this data, designs greater than 95 BIL are already equivalent to the agreed upon efficiency of EL2 for DL12 based 

on a worse case scenario of 150 BIL. 

Equivalent current densities, flux densities, core construction and impedances force the losses up 30% from a similar 15 kv 

class 95 BIL design.

The use of high-B core steel (H0-DR) allowed for a more efficient design to achieve an increase in losses of 10% as agreed to by 

the NEMA proposal.

090000648113122b.xlsx 10/2/2012
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Notes:

1. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 83 FR 22178, May 14, 2018.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 83 FR 61310, Nov. 29, 2018

3. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 85 FR 65504, Oct. 15, 2020.

4. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 87 FR 44266, July 26, 2022.

#### § 2.201 Director, Office of Ethics.

Pursuant to the Office of Government Ethics regulations at 5 CFR part 2638, the Director, Office of Ethics, shall be the USDA Designated Agency Ethics Official with the authority to coordinate and manage the Department's ethics program as provided in part 2638.

[78 FR 40940, July 9, 2013]
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TennesseeCommerce Bancorp, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)             The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)             The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 
|        | By:                                  | /s/ Arthur F. Helf |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------|--------------------|--------|
|   | Arthur F. Helf                       |
|   | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                                 |
|   | Dated: August 14, 2006          |

 

----
Exhibit
      32.2




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
      THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Chardan North China Acquisition
      Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007
      (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof, I Kerry Propper, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company,
      certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
                and




2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.







By:
      /s/
      Kerry Propper  Dated:
      May 21, 2007


-------------------------------------------------


Kerry
      Propper


Chief
      Financial Officer and Secretary


(Principal
      Accounting and Financial Officer)
###### Editorial Note on Part 1980

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1980 appear at 80 FR 9905, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1980.1205 Eligible purposes.

Recipients may use funds for the costs of the construction, improvement, and acquisition of broadband facilities and equipment in rural areas, as set forth in this part. Rural area shall be defined by the applicable program regulations.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.16

[HSBC LOGO]

                        PRICE DETERMINATION AGREEMENT

To:   Nam Tai Electronics,Inc. '
      Mcw. Todman & Co.
      McNamara Chambers
      PO BOX 3342
      Road Town
      Tonola
      British Virgin Islands
                                                                   22 APRIL 2004

Dear Sirs

Global Offering of 180,000,000 Shares OF HK$0.10 each (210,000,000 Shares If
the Over-allotment Option is exercised in full) of Nam Tai Electronic &
Electrical Products Limited (the "Company")

We refer to the Public Offer Underwriting Agreement dated 16 April 2004 between
the Company, yourselves, ourselves and others relating to the Global Offering.
Terms defined In the Public Offer Underwriting Agreement have the some meanings
when used in this letter

This letter confirms the agreement reached today between yourselves (after
conversation with the Company) and ourselves that the offer Price shall be
HK$3.88 per Share (exclusive of brokerage. Hong Kong Stock Exchange trading fee,
SFC transaction levy and Investor compensation levy).

Yours faithfully,

For itself and on behalf of each of the Public Offer Underwriters
The Hongkong and Shanghel Banking Corporation Limited

/s/ Jonathan Orders
------------------------
Name:  Jonathan Orders

Title: Head of Equity Captial Markets
       Managing Director, Corporate Finance and Advisory,Asia-Pacific

CONFIRMED AND ACCEPTED as of the date first above written

For and on behalf of            For and on behalf of
Nam Tai Electronics, Inc.       Nam Tai Electronic & Electrical Products Umited

/s/ KOO MING KOWN              /s/ WONG KUEN LING
------------------------        ------------------------
Name: KOO MING KOWN             Name: WONG KUEN LING

Title: CFO                      Title: CHAIRMAN & CEO

THE HONGKONG AND SHANGHAI BANKING, CORPORATIONS LIMITED
CORPORATE INVESMENT BANKING AND MARKETS
LEVEL 15.)QUEEN'S ROAD CENTRAL, HONG KONG
TEL:(852)9848888 FAX:(852)28455654
### NUMBER 13

- 13

- 00 599

- CV



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________
NITA WINKLER , APPELLANT,

v.

FEDERAL HOME LOAN MO RTGAGE CORPORATION , APPELLEE.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

of Bell County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Garza , Benavides, and Pe rkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Nita Winkler , perfected an appeal from a judgment rendered against her

in favor of appellee, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation

. 1 On February 11, 2014

,

1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Third Court of Appeals in Austin pursuant to a docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See T EX . G OV ' T C ODE A NN . § 73.001 (West 2005).2

the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the clerk's record in the above cause was

originally due on August 9, 201 3 , and that the district clerk, Shelley Coston , had notified

this Court that appellant failed to make arrangements for payment of the clerk's record.

The Clerk of this Court not ified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to

correct the defect, if it could be done. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Appellant

was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt

of this no tice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution.

Appellant has failed to respond to this Court ’ s notice. Accordingly, the appeal is

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.3(b), (c).

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed the 2 7 th day of March , 20 14

.
###### Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV

#### Editorial Note:

For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov.*

#### § 1412.43 Reconstitutions.

Farms will only be reconstituted in accordance with subpart G of this part and part 718 of this title.

[79 FR 57717, Sept. 26, 2014]