alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 205.641 Payment of fees and other charges. ( a ) Applicants for initial accreditation and renewal of accreditation must remit the nonrefundable fee, pursuant to § 205.640(a)(3), along with their application. Remittance must be made payable to the USDA, AMS Livestock Program and mailed to: USDA, AMS Livestock, Poultry and Seed Program, QAD, P.O. Box 790304 St. Louis, MO 63179-0304 or such other address as required by the Program Manager.
( b ) Payments for fees and other charges not covered under paragraph (a) of this section must be: ( 1 ) Received by the due date shown on the bill for collection;
( 2 ) Made payable to the Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA; and
( 3 ) Mailed to the address provided on the bill for collection.
( c ) The Administrator shall assess interest, penalties, and administrative costs on debts not paid by the due date shown on a bill for collection and collect delinquent debts or refer such debts to the Department of Justice for litigation.
[65 FR 80637, Dec. 21, 2000, as amended at 80 FR 6429, Feb. 5, 2015]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENSACOLA DIVISION 

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCTS

 Case No. 3:19md2885 

LIABILITY LITIGATION 

This Document Relates to: 

Vilsmeyer, 7:20cv113 

 

Judge M. Casey Rodgers 

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones 

EXHIBITS ORDER NO. 1 

This Order addresses Defendants’ objections to exhibits identified on 

Plaintiff’s first priority exhibit list dated February 15, 2022. The Court’s rulings are 

set forth and highlighted in the attached Exhibit A. Rulings for all remaining 

objections on parties’ priority exhibit lists will follow by separate order. 

SO ORDERED this 5th day of March, 2022. 

 

 M. CASEY RODGERS 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 7:20-cv-00113-MCR-GRJ Document 104 Filed 03/05/22 Page 1 of 1
98-1424.

#### Brecksville v. Linn.

Cuyahoga App. No. 72808. On motion to stay judgment of court .of appeals. Motion, denied. 98-1425. State v. Cooper. ,

Summit App. No. 18931. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., dissent.
/*     FILE ARCHIVED ON 13:07:43 Aug 21, 2006 AND RETRIEVED FROM THE     INTERNET ARCHIVE ON 14:44:36 Mar 5, 2012.     JAVASCRIPT APPENDED BY WAYBACK MACHINE, COPYRIGHT INTERNET ARCHIVE.     ALL OTHER CONTENT MAY ALSO BE PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT (17 U.S.C.     SECTION 108(a)(3)).*//*    This style sheet defines a few simple default styles (like   font-face, default link style etc.)    $Id: base.css 314 2006-04-09 12:47:30Z cmil $ */body{  font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif;  font-style: normal;  font-size: 12px;  background-color: white;  color: black;}/* for those browsers with flawed inheritance */form, table, caption{   font-family: Verdana, Arial, sans-serif;  font-size: 12px;  color: black;}/* use Tahoma for Arabic */body.lang-ar, body.lang-ar form,body.lang-ar table, body.lang-ar caption{  font-family: Tahoma, Verdana, sans-serif;}strong { font-weight: bold; }em     { font-style: italic; }small  { font-size: 11px; }center { text-align: left; }font   { color: black; }/*    Horizontal rulers in the HTML source are used as a fallback   for non-CSS browsers to separate individual parts of the document.   For CSS browsers this is achieved by page layout and therefore the   rulers must not be displayed. If rulers should be used in the   content section an appropriate style contents.css needs to be    defined.*/hr { display: none; }/* other elements not to display in CSS browsers */.textmode { display: none; }/* definition lists */dl { margin: 1em 0; }dt { margin-top: 1em; }dd { margin: .3em 0 0 2em;}/* blockquote is not for indentation */blockquote { margin-left: 0; margin-right: 0; padding: 0; }
### I N THE UNI TED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FI F TH CI RCUI T

No. 12-50471 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. VICTOR HUGO TORRES-VARGAS, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:11-CR-3096-1

Before DeMOSS, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Victor Hugo T orres-Vargas asserts t h a t his below-guidelines 60-month sentence for illegal r eentry i s substantively unreasonable. According t o TorresVargas, the guidelines sentencing range was unreasonably h i gh beca use the guideline was not e mpirically based and it double-counted his criminal history. He further asserts that the guidelines range was unreasonably high because his offense amounted to a non-violent trespass offense. In addition, Torres-Vargas contends that his s e n t e n c e did not account for his history a nd c haracteristics, U n i t e d S t a te s C o u rt o f A p p e al s

F i f t h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D April 26, 2013 Ly l e W . Cay ce Clerk

* Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R

. 47. 5, the court has d eterm ined that this op inion should not be p ublis hed and is not p reced ent excep t und er the lim ited circum s tances s et forth in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47. 5. 4. Case: 12-50471 Document: 00512222549 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/26/2013No. 12-50471

including that h e entered the United States as a seven-year-old child , t hat he lived here for forty years, and that he returned to see his family. Final l y, he contends th a t th e b e l o w - gu i d e l i n e s s e nt e nce overstated his risk of recidivism and his danger to the community because his past crimes were the r e s ult of substance abuse that has ended. We review the substantive reasonableness of Torres-Vargas’s sentence for abuse of disc r e t i on. See Gall v. United States , 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The sentence i s n o t rendered unreasonable b y the lack of e mpirical b asis for the illegal reentry guideline or by any double-counting of Torres-Vargas’s c riminal history. See United States v. Duarte , 5 69 F.3d 528, 529-31 ( 5th Cir. 2 009). We also find no m erit in the argument that the sentence i s unr e a s o n a b le because illegal reentry a mounts to a n onviolent trespass o ffen s e . Se e United States v. Juarez-Duarte , 513 F.3d 204, 212 (5th Cir. 2008). T h e district court considered Torres-Vargas’s m o t ive for returning and his personal h istory and

c h a racteristics, including h is past substance abuse, and it s entenced him 10 months below the applicable guideline s r a nge. H e has not s hown that the sentence was unreasonable. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 12-50471 Document: 00512222549 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/26/2013
§ 16.1 Purpose and applicability. ( a ) The purpose of this part is to set forth Department of Agriculture (USDA) policy regarding equal opportunity for faith-based organizations to participate in USDA assistance programs for which other private organizations are eligible.
( b ) Except as otherwise specifically provided in this part, the policy outlined in this part applies to all recipients and subrecipients of USDA assistance to which 2 CFR part 400 applies, and to recipients and subrecipients of Commodity Credit Corporation assistance that is administered by agencies of USDA.
[89 FR 15707, Mar. 4, 2024]
**UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD ANN ARBOR, MI 48105
- 2498

OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION December 2 0 , 2010 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Meeting with Allison Transmission FROM: Chien Sze and Cleophas Jackson TO: Docket EPA
- HQ
- OAR
- 2010
- 0162 This memorandum documents a meeting held on Mon day , December 20 , 2010 b etween Allison Transmission and EPA and included the following individuals: Allison Transmission : Dinh Ngo and Stephen F. Spurli n EPA: Cle ophas Jackson, Houshun Zh ang, By ungho L ee , Anthony

Neam , Carl Ryan , James Sanchez, Peter Smith, Jay Smith, William Courtois and C hi en Sze The discussion focused primarily on GEM (Greenhouse g as Emissions Model) features , model inputs , and the possibility of evaluation of Allison transmission system at the EPA heavy

- dut y engine site.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 224 (Monday, November 22, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 71064]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28997]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

42 CFR Parts 417, 422, and 423

[CMS-4144-CN]
RIN 0938-AQ00


Medicare Program; Proposed Changes to the Medicare Advantage and 
the Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit Programs for Contract Year 2012 
and Other Proposed Changes; Correction

AGENCY: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.

ACTION: Correction of proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document corrects a technical error that appeared in the 
proposed rule entitled ``Medicare Program; Proposed Changes to the 
Medicare Advantage and the Medicare Prescription Drug Benefit Programs 
for Contract Year 2012 and Other Proposed Changes'' which was filed for 
public inspection on November 10, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sabrina Ahmed, (410) 786-7499.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background

    In FR Doc. 2010-28774 filed November 10, 2010, there was a 
technical error that is identified and corrected in the Correction of 
Errors section below.

II. Summary of Errors

    In the DATES section, we inadvertently requested that the Office of 
the Federal Register base the comment period closing date on the date 
the proposed rule will appear in the Federal Register instead of the 
date of filing for public inspection. Therefore, in section III. of 
this correction notice, we correct this error by inserting the date 
that the comment period closes, which is January 11, 2011.

III. Waiver of 60-Day Comment Period

    We ordinarily permit a 60-day comment period on notices of proposed 
rulemaking in the Federal Register, as provided in section 1871(b)(1) 
of the Act. The change made by this correction notice does not 
constitute agency rulemaking, and therefore the 60-day comment period 
does not apply. This correction notice merely corrects a technical 
error in the proposed rule and does not make substantive changes to the 
proposed rule that would require additional time on which to comment. 
Instead, this correction notice is intended to ensure the accuracy of 
the proposed rule.

IV. Correction of Errors

    In FR Doc. 2010-28774 filed November 10, 2010, make the following 
correction:
    1. In the DATES section, the phrase ``[OFR--insert date 60 days 
after date of publication in the Federal Register]'' is corrected to 
read ``January 11, 2011.''

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.773, 
Medicare--Hospital Insurance; and Program No. 93.774, Medicare--
Supplementary Medical Insurance Program)

    Dated: November 12, 2010.
Barbara J. Holland,
Deputy Executive Secretary to the Department.
[FR Doc. 2010-28997 Filed 11-12-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4120-01-P
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1416.112 Farm-raised fish payment calculations. ( a ) An eligible farm-raised fish producer may receive payments for fish feed losses due to an eligible adverse weather or eligible loss condition, as specified in § 1416.103(h), based on a national payment rate, as determined in § 1416.109, multiplied by the producer's actual cost for the fish feed that was: ( 1 ) Damaged or destroyed due to an eligible adverse weather or eligible loss condition, as specified in § 1416.103(h)(1); and
( 2 ) Purchased, above normal, to maintain the farm-raised fish during an eligible adverse weather or eligible loss condition until additional farm-raised fish feed becomes available, as specified in § 1416.103(h)(2).
( b ) An eligible producer of farm-raised fish may receive payments for death losses of farm-raised fish due to an eligible adverse weather or eligible loss condition, as specified in § 1416.103(j), based on a national payment rate, as determined in § 1416.109, multiplied by: ( 1 ) Average fair market value of the bait fish, game fish, or other aquatic species, as determined by the Deputy Administrator, that died as a direct result of an eligible adverse weather or eligible loss condition, as computed using nationwide prices unless some other price data is approved for use by the Deputy Administrator; and
( 2 ) Number of eligible bait fish, game fish, or other aquatic species, as determined by the Deputy Administrator, that died as a result of an eligible adverse weather or loss condition, in excess of normal mortality, as determined by the Deputy Administrator.
( c ) Payments calculated in this section or elsewhere with respect to ELAP are subject to the adjustments and limits provided for in this part and are also subject to the payment limitations and average adjusted gross income limitations that are contained in part 1400 of this chapter.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1980

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1980 appear at 80 FR 9905, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1980.489 [Reserved]
Editorial Note on Subchapter B of Chapter XIV
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations to regulations affecting previous program years not included in this volume, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*

§ 1421.112 Foreclosure. ( a ) ( 1 ) Upon maturity and nonpayment of a warehouse-stored MAL, title to the unredeemed collateral securing the MAL will immediately vest in CCC.
( 2 ) Upon maturity and nonpayment of a farm-stored MAL, title to the unredeemed collateral will automatically transfer to CCC upon CCC demand.
( 3 ) When CCC acquires title to the unredeemed collateral, CCC will not pay for any market value that such collateral may have in excess of the MAL indebtedness, (the unpaid amount of the note and charges plus interest).
( b ) If the total amount due on a farm-stored MAL (the unpaid amount of the note plus charges, and interest) is not satisfied upon maturity, CCC may remove the commodity from storage, and assign, transfer, and deliver the commodity or documents evidencing title thereto when, how, and upon terms as CCC determines. Disposition may also be affected without removing the commodity from storage. The commodity may be processed before sale and CCC may become the purchaser of the whole or any part of the commodity at either a public or private sale. ( 1 ) The value of settlement for a farm-stored commodity removed by CCC from storage and will be as provided in § 1421.111.
( 2 ) If a deficiency exists after the collateral is sold, a receivable for such deficiency will be established in accordance with part 1403 of this title.
[67 FR 63511, Oct. 11, 2002. Redesignated and amended at 74 FR 15655, Apr. 7, 2009; 80 FR 124, 130, Jan. 2, 2015; 86 FR 70705, Dec. 13, 2021]
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-22-00107-CV

IN RE JBS CARRIERS, INC. and Alicia Faye Roberts

Original Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 6, 2022

MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; DISMISSED 

On February 21, 2022, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for 

temporary relief requesting a stay of the underlying proceedings pending final resolution of the 

petition for writ of mandamus. The real party in interest filed a response to which relators replied. 

On March 24, 2022, relators filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the petition for writ of 

mandamus. We grant the motion and dismiss the original proceeding. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(a)(1)–(2). Relators’ motion for temporary relief is denied as moot. 

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2020CI07282, styled Elizabeth Serrano v. Alicia Faye Roberts and JBS 

Carriers, Inc., pending in the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable David A. Canales

presiding.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1980

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1980 appear at 80 FR 9905, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### §§ 1980.446-1980.450 [Reserved]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000793547
<NAME>                        The Navigators Group, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S DOLLARS

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           222,555
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            0
<EQUITIES>                                     11,840
<MORTGAGE>                                     0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 241,142
<CASH>                                         5,546
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             229,111
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         5,878
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 631,324
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                391,094
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            55,003
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                24,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       846
<OTHER-SE>                                     129,519
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   631,324
<PREMIUMS>                                     89,442
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            15,985
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             (443)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 640
<BENEFITS>                                     69,914
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    14,721
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           24,879
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,392)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,740)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,652)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,652)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.43)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.43)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 150,517
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                             60,534
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                               9,380
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             (10,925)
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               (38,976)
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                170,530
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                          9,380




</TABLE>
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations 

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590

Amendment to Exemption 11441

Eagle UAV Services, LLC currently holds exemption number 11441 for the commercial operation of a 

Sensefly eBee UAS to be used for mapping and survey operations. We are requesting that our 

exemption be amended to include the operation of a DJI Phantom 3, a UA that is currently operated 

under several exemptions issued by the Department of Transportation. The DJI Phantom 3 will be used 

for aerial photography. We do not intend to conduct closed set filming or operations that require the 

close proximity of non-participating persons to the UA.

Aaron Rose

President

Eagle UAV Services, LLC

432 Cherry Orchard Road

Canton, Michigan 48188
**Exhibit 32.1**
 
 
 **Certification
        Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**
 **As
        Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
 
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Maidenform Brands, Inc.
        (the “Company”) for the three-month period ended July 2, 2005, as filed
        with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
        I, Thomas J. Ward, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
        pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
 
 (1)  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
        applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/
                Thomas J. WardThomas
                J. WardChief
                Executive Officer
  August
        30, 2005
 
 *This
        certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of
        that
        section, nor shall it be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any
        filing
        under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
        except
        to the extent the Company specifically incorporates it by
        reference.*
 
 46
§ 1205.530 Gin reports and reporting schedule. ( a ) *Gin reports.* Each year each cotton gin in the United States shall submit reports to the Cotton Board on forms or certificates made available or approved by the Cotton Board as follows: ( 1 ) *End-of-season report.* Except as provided in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, each gin shall report to the Cotton Board an alphabetical listing of producer names, their addresses, and the number of bales ginned for each such producer during its ginning season.
( 2 ) *Certificate in Lieu of End-of-Season Report.* If a gin is the collecting handler on every bale ginned at such gin and collecting handler reports and remittances of assessments have been made in accordance with § 1205.516, a certification to that effect may be made to the Cotton Board in lieu of an end-of-season report.
( b ) *Reporting schedule.* The schedule for submitting gin reports is as follows: ( 1 ) Each gin that completes ginning operations prior to January 16 shall make a report to the Cotton Board within 10 days after completion of ginning.
( 2 ) Each gin that operates on or after January 16 will make a report to the Cotton Board not later than January 25 covering bales ginned through January 15.
( 3 ) Each gin that operates after January 15 shall make a supplemental report to the Cotton Board within 10 days after the close of ginning operations covering bales ginned after January 15.
[42 FR 35974, July 13, 1977, as amended at 57 FR 29192, July 1, 1992]