alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1879 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1879

     To provide for the safe disposal of Federal Government-owned 
          transuranic waste for the benefit of all Americans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2013

 Mr. Pearce (for himself and Mr. Reed) introduced the following bill; 
  which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in 
    addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To provide for the safe disposal of Federal Government-owned 
          transuranic waste for the benefit of all Americans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Government Waste Isolation Pilot 
Plant Extension Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF WASTE ISOLATION PILOT PLANT MISSION.

    The Secretary of Energy shall manage WIPP in such a way as to 
include, in addition to the disposal of wastes authorized by section 
213 of the Department of Energy National Security and Military 
Applications of Nuclear Energy Authorization Act of 1980 (Public Law 
96-164; 93 Stat. 1259, 1265), the transportation and disposal of any 
non-defense Federal Government-owned transuranic waste that can be 
shown to meet the applicable criteria described in the document 
entitled ``Transuranic Waste Acceptance Criteria For The Waste 
Isolation Pilot Plant'', published by the Department of Energy on April 
21, 2011, or any successor document.

SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Disposal; transuranic waste.--The terms ``disposal'' 
        and ``transuranic waste'' have the meanings given those terms 
        in section 2 of the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant Land Withdrawal 
        Act (Public Law 102-579; 106 Stat. 4777).
            (2) WIPP.--The term ``WIPP'' means the Waste Isolation 
        Pilot Plant project authorized under section 213 of the 
        Department of Energy National Security and Military 
        Applications of Nuclear Energy Authorization Act of 1980 
        (Public Law 96-164; 93 Stat. 1259, 1265).
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION



I, Christine Thomas, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Cascade Technologies Corp.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officers, if any, and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I (we) have:



a.

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b.

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (Evaluation Date); and

c.

presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrants other certifying officers, if any, and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a.

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b.

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and



6.

The registrants other certifying officers, if any, and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were any significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.







/s/ Christine Thomas

Date: April 11, 2008

Christine Thomas, Secretary/Director

Chief Financial Officer
| (1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Registrant. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                      /s/ Dr. Ralph S. Cunningham |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:                                                                                                                       | Dr.      Ralph S. Cunningham |
| Title:                                                                                                                      | Chief      Executive Officer of EPE Holdings, LLC |
|                                                                                                                        | the      General Partner of Enterprise GP HoldingsL.P. |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ANTHONY LEE KEMBERLING,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 244 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 12th day of August, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Schwe1zensche E1dgenossenschaft 

Confederation su1sse 

Confederaz1one Sv1zzera 

Confederaziun svizra 

EOCA, CH-3003 Bem 

Mr. Paul Gretch 

Director, Office for International Aviation 

Federal Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and 

Communications DETEC 

Federal Office of Civil Aviation FOCA 

Aviation Policy and Strategy 

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Aviation and 

International Affairs 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

400 7th Street, S.W., Room 6402 

Washington, DC 20590 

USA 

Reference: 0101101·02.02.187 

Your reference: 

Our reference: ijl 

Contad person: Laurence Fontana Jungo 

Tel. +41 58 463 04 10, Fax +41 58 465 92 12. Laurence.fonlana·)ungo@bazl.admln.ch 

IHigen, 27 February 2015 

Declaration of Reciprocity 

Dear Mr. Gretch 

The Federal Office of Civil Aviation of Switzerland herewith declares, that it will consider applications 

by U.S. air carriers for approval to operate charters to and from Switzerland In accordance with the 

provisions of the Air Transport Agreement between the Swiss Confederation and the United States of 

America, dated 21 June 2010, and, for those charters not specified in the Annex to the Agreement, on 

the basis of comity and reciprocity. 

Yours sincerely 

h\Oenll Director 

Head Aviation Policy and Strategy 

Laurence 

\_ 

Fontana 

(J 

Junge 

~ 

Chief Negotiator Air Services Agreements 

Federal Office of Civil Aviation 

Miihlestrasse 3, 3063 llligen 

Postal address: CH-3003 Bern 

Tel +41 31 325 80 39/40. Fax +41 31 325 80 32 

www.aviation.admln.ch
###### Editorial Note on Part 1955

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1955 appear at 80 FR 9895, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1955.120 Payment of points (housing).

To effect regular sale of inventory SFH property to a purchaser who is financing the purchase of the property with a non-Rural Development loan, the County Supervisor may authorize the payment by Rural Development of not more than three points. The payment must be a customary requirement of the lender for the seller within the community where the property is located. Terms of payment will be incorporated in Form RD 1955-45 and will be fixed as of the date the form is signed by the appropriate Rural Development official. Points will *not* be paid to reduce the purchaser's interest rate. The payment will be deducted from the funds to be received by Rural Development at closing.

[53 FR 27836, July 25, 1988. Redesignated at 55 FR 3942, Feb. 6, 1990, as amended at 58 FR 52653, Oct. 12, 1993; 68 FR 61332, Oct. 28, 2003]
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the AnnualReport of Candela Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the periodending July 3, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, F. PaulBroyer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ F. Paul Broyer      |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| F. Paul Broyer          |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| September 14, 2004      |

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ROBERT PALMER,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 457 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 20th day of March, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
§ 247.17 Notification of discontinuance of participant. ( a ) *What must a local agency do if it has evidence that a participant is no longer eligible for CSFP benefits during the certification period?* If a local agency has evidence that a participant is no longer eligible for CSFP benefits during the certification period, it must provide the participant with a written notification of discontinuance at least 15 days before the effective date of discontinuance.
( b ) *What must a local agency do if it has to discontinue a participant from participation in the program prior to the end of the certification period due to the lack of resources necessary to continue providing benefits to the participant?* If a local agency does not have sufficient resources, such as a sufficient number of caseload slots, to continue providing benefits to the participant(s) for the entire certification period, it must provide the participant(s) with a written notification of discontinuance at least 15 days before the effective date of discontinuance.
( c ) *What must be included in the notification of discontinuance?* The notification of discontinuance must include the effective date of discontinuance, the reason for the participant's discontinuance, a statement of the individual's right to appeal the discontinuance through the fair hearing process, in accordance with § 247.33(a), and a statement that informs the applicant that program standards are applied without discrimination by race, color, national origin, age, sex, or disability.
#### § 1260.640 Application for Certification Form.

The following official form, “Application for Certification of Association or Organization,” must be completed and submitted to the Department by eligible State organizations or associations seeking certification by the Secretary. This form may be reproduced.

[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/EC04SE91.000/EC04SE91.000_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/EC04SE91.000/EC04SE91.000_original_size.png)
EXHIBIT 15.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:



(1)

Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-146790) pertaining to the 2003 Equity Compensation Plan of China Resources Development, Inc., the predecessor to China Natural Resources, Inc. (the Company), and



(2)

Form F-3 (Registration No. 333-163702) of the Company;



of our reports dated April 27, 2012, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of the Company, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of the Company, included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the two years ended December 31, 2011.









/s/ Ernst & Young

Certified Public Accountants

Hong Kong



April 27, 2012
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

RADWARE, LTD., RADWARE, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

F5 NETWORKS, INC.,

Defendant-Cross-Appellant

______________________ 

2017-1212, 2017-1248

______________________ 

Appeals from the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of California in No. 5:13-cv-02024-

RMW, Senior Judge Ronald M. Whyte.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

FABIO E. MARINO, McDermott, Will & Emery LLP, 

Menlo Park, CA, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Also 

represented by NITIN GAMBHIR; JOSHUA DAVID 

ROGACZEWSKI, Washington, DC.

 RAMSEY M. AL-SALAM, Perkins Coie, LLP, Seattle, 

WA, argued for defendant-cross-appellant. Also represented by CHRISTINA JORDAN MCCULLOUGH, STEVAN R.

STARK, JR. 

______________________ 
 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, DYK, and TARANTO, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 September 18, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner 

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, Douglas P. Collier, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Volcom, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: November 10, 2006 /s/ Douglas P. Collier         Douglas P. Collier    Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer    (Principal Financial Officer)
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Fifth Circuit**

____________ No. 23-50769 Summary Calendar

____________ United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee , versus Braulio De La Rosa-Cordova, Defendant—Appellant . ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:22-CR-2283-1

______________________________ Before Haynes, Higginson, and Douglas, Circuit Judges . Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represen t Braulio De La Rosa-Cordova has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). De La Rosa-Cordova has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the releva nt portions of the record reflected

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED July 22, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-50769 Document: 60-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/22/2024No. 23-50769

2 therein. We concur with counsel’s as sessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review . Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED . See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Case: 23-50769 Document: 60-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/22/2024
Editorial Note on Part 246
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 246 appear at 76 FR 35097, June 16, 2011.

§ 246.20 Audits. ( a ) *Federal audit responsibilities.* ( 1 ) OIG reserves the right to perform audits of State and local agencies and other organizations involved in the Program as determined by OIG to be necessary. In performing such audits, OIG will rely to the extent feasible on audit work performed by other Federal and non-Federal auditors.
( 2 ) The State agency may take exception to particular audit findings and recommendations. The State agency shall submit a response or statement to FNS as to the action taken or a proposed corrective action plan regarding the findings. A proposed corrective action plan developed and submitted by the State agency shall include specific timeframes for its implementation and for completion of correction of deficiencies and their causes.
( 3 ) FNS will determine whether Program deficiencies have been adequately corrected. If additional corrective action is necessary, FNS shall schedule a follow-up review, allowing a reasonable time for such corrective action to be taken.
( b ) *State audit responsibilities.* ( 1 ) State agencies must obtain annual audits in accordance with 2 CFR part 200, subpart F, and appendix XI, Compliance Supplement, and USDA implanting regulations 2 CFR parts 400 and 415. In addition, States must require local agencies under their jurisdiction to obtain audits in accordance with 2 CFR part 200, subpart F, and appendix XI, Compliance Supplement, and USDA implementing regulations 2 CFR parts 400 and 415.
( 2 ) Each State agency shall make all State or local agency sponsored audit reports of Program operations under its jurisdiction available for the Department's review upon request. The cost of these audits shall be considered a part of nutrition services and administration costs and may be funded from the State or local agency nutrition services and administration funds, as appropriate. For purposes of determining the Program's pro rata share of indirect costs associated with organization-wide audits, the cost of food shall not be considered in the total dollar amount of the Program.
[50 FR 6121, Feb. 13, 1985, as amended at 71 FR 56731, Sept. 27, 2006; 81 FR 66494, Sept. 28, 2016; 83 FR 14173, Apr. 3, 2018]
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 12, 2019

No. 04-19-00181-CV

IN RE BRUINGTON ENGINEERING LTD., Schlumberger Technology Corp., Schlumberger 

Services Inc., and Schlumberger Limited,

Appellant

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Zapata County, Texas

Trial Court No. 7,767 and 8,310

Honorable Jose A. Lopez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

The Relators’ Emergency Motion to Reinstate Stay is hereby DENIED.

It is so ORDERED on April 12, 2019.

 PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _________________________

 Keith E. Hottle

 Clerk of Court