alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H - 1

APPENDIX H: LIST OF ACRONYMS

AGC --- Associated General Contractors of America ARB --- Air Resources Board ATCM --- Airborne Toxic Control Measures BACT --- Best Available Control Technology BC --- Black Carbon CAA --- Federal Clean Air Act CCR --- California Code of Regulations CO 2 -eq --- Carbon Dioxide Equivalents CPCFA --- California Air Pollution Control Financin g Authority DOF --- Department of Finance DOORS --- Diesel Off-Road On-Line Reporting System EIN --- Equipment Identification Number FAEL --- Fleet Average Emission Level GDP --- Gross Domestic Product GHG --- Green House Gas GSE --- Ground Support Equipment GWP --- Global Warming Potential HC --- Hydrocarbon HP --- Horsepower HP-Hours ---Horsepower Hours HEALTH & SAF. CODE --- California Health and Safety Code IPCC --- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change KW --- Kilowatt LHU --- Limited Hours of Use LSI --- Large Spark Ignition MMT --- Million Metric Tons NAAQS --- National Ambient Air Quality Standards NO X --- Oxides of Nitrogen OAL --- Office of Administrative Law ORIAG --- Off-Road Implementation Advisory Group OSM --- Off-road Simulation ModelH - 2

PLACE --- Providing Loan Assistance to California E quipment PM --- Particulate Matter PM2.5 --- Fine Particulate Matter SIP --- State Implementation Plan TAC --- Toxic Air Contaminants TPD --- Tons Per Day TSD --- Technical Support Document UCLA --- University of California, Los Angeles UL --- Underwriters Laboratories UOP --- University of the Pacific U.S. EPA --- United States Environmental Protection Agency VDECS --- Verified Diesel Emission Control System
97-1231.

#### State ex rel. Tubbs Jones v. Suster.

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition. Upon consideration of relator’s motion for oral hearing,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for oral hearing be, and hereby is, denied.

F.E. Sweeney, J., concurs because the request is moot.

Lundberg Stratton, J., concurs because Visiting Judge Knepper has received and reviewed the audiotapes of the January 13,1998 oral arguments.

Douglas and Resnick, JJ., dissent and would grant the motion.

Richard W. Knepper, J., of the Sixth Appellate District, sitting for Pfeifer, J.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 USC, SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the amended quarterly report of Northern Ethanol, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted            pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Dated: August 15, 2007 | s/Gordon Laschinger____________________

Gordon Laschinger, Chief Executive Officer |
|----------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
§ 15b.33 Housing. ( a ) *Housing provided by the recipient.* A recipient that provides housing to its nonhandicapped students shall provide comparable, convenient, and accessible housing to handicapped students at the same cost as to others. At the end of the transition period provided for in subpart C, such housing shall be available in sufficient quantity and variety so that the scope of handicapped students' choice of living accommodations is, as a whole, comparable to that of nonhandicapped students.
( b ) *Other housing.* A recipient that assists any agency, organization, or person in making housing available to any of its students shall take such action as may be necessary to assure itself that such housing is, as a whole, made available in a manner that does not result in discrimination on the basis of handicap.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I,Lawrence Kong, certify that:

1. Ihave reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Bidz.com, Inc.;

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Date: August 10, 2007 |                    |
|-----------------------|-------------------------|
|                  |                    |
|                  | /s/ Lawrence Kong       |
|                  | Lawrence Kong           |
|                  | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
|  |  |  |  |  |
|--|--|--|--|--|
|  |  |  |  |

|  | United States AttorneysOffices Web Pages |
|--|------------------------------------------|
|  |                                          |

State, District*USAO Weedand Seed Web site
*ArizonaCalifornia,CentralCalifornia,Southern*Colorado*Districtof Columbia*Florida,MiddleFlorida,Southern*HawaiiIllinois,CentralIndiana,SouthernIowa,SouthernIowa,NorthernKentucky,Western*Louisiana,EasternLouisiana,Western*Maryland*Michigan,EasternMichigan,WesternMinnesotaNebraskaNewJersey*NewYork, Northern*NewYork, Western*NorthCarolina, Eastern*Ohio,SouthernOklahoma,NorthernPennsylvania,EasternRhodeIslandSouthCarolinaTennessee,Middle*Texas,SouthernTexas,WesternVermont*Washington,Western
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED WITHIN THE COMPANY'S SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 FORM 10-K
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>            1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      31,172,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              114,547,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 17,469,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           177,803,000
<PP&E>                                     504,950,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             107,206,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             591,707,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       70,896,000
<BONDS>                                     68,702,000
<COMMON>                                     1,057,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                 416,682,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               591,707,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           714,317,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              507,628,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            64,763,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,515,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            138,411,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                54,325,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         84,086,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                84,086,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
97-2419.

#### State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. Sheward.

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for writs of mandamus and prohibition. Upon consideration of the motion of *amicus curiae,*Owens Corning, to extend time for oral argument,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to extend time for oral argument be, and hereby is, denied.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of C-Chip Technologies Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A-1 for the year ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Benjamin Leboe, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 4th day of March, 2004.



| | /s/ Benjamin Leboe
Benjamin Leboe 
Chief Financial Officer
| | ----------------------------------------------------------

















---
#### §§ 1778.15-1778.20 [Reserved]
Data from Alcoa Aluminum, Warrick, IN (4 files)
EXHIBIT 31.1



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to the requirements of Rules 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, James R. Musick provides the following certification.



I, James R. Musick, President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Vitro Diagnostics, Inc. ("Company") certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this amended annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of the Company;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this amended annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in the amended annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this amended annual report;



4.

I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15-d-14) for the registrant and have designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Company is made known to me by others, particularly during the period in which this amended annual report is being prepared;



5.

I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of our board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a.

All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls, and



b.

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees which have a significant role in the Company's internal controls; and



6.

I have indicated in this amended annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal control or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



|                        |  |     |                                                         | 
|----------------------- |  | --- | ------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                        |  |     |                                                         | 
|Date: February 15, 2008 |  | By: | /s/ James R. Musick                                     | 
|                        |  |     | James R. Musick, President                              | 
|                        |  |     | Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer |
Editorial Note on Part 1980
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1980 appear at 80 FR 9905, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1980.1010 Project eligibility. In order to be eligible to receive funds under this subpart, the Project must meet the following: ( a ) The Project must meet the Project eligibility criteria of the applicable program identified in § 1980.1002;
( b ) The Project must be carried out in a rural area; and
( c ) The Project must support the implementation of a Strategic Community Investment Plans on a multi-jurisdictional and multi-sectoral basis.
[80 FR 28816, May 20, 2015, as amended at 85 FR 59394, Sept. 22, 2020]
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

October 30, 2017

No. 04

- 17

- 00713

- CR

IN RE Esmeralda C. RODRIGUEZ

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

On October 27, 2017, Relator filed a pet ition for writ of mandamus. The court has

considered the petition and is of the opinion Relator is not entitled to the relief sought.

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a). The

court ’s opinion will issue at a later date.

It is so ORDERED on October 30, 2017

.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I ha ve hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 30th day of October, 2017

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 147709, styled Esmeralda C. Rodriguez v. State of Texas , pending in the

County Court at Law No. 13, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Crystal D. Chandler presiding.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certification
      of Principal Executive Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SRKP 2, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
      10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard A. Rappaport,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
                  Richard A. RappaportRichard
                  A. Rappaport
                Principal
                  Executive Officer
                May
                  6, 2008
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

TRAVEL GROUP, INC., D/B/A REPUBLIC AIR TRAVEL 

AND SCOT SPENCER 

AIRLIFT GROUP, INC. 

AND RICHARD BERNARD 

Unauthorized Air Transportation, 

Unfair and Deceptive Practices and Unfair Methods of 

Competition, and Violations of Public Charter Rules 

EXPRESS ONE INTERNATIONAL, INC. 

Unfair and Deceptive Practices and Unfair Methods of 

Competition, and Violations of Public Charter Rules 

Enforcement Proceeding 

STATUS REPORT 

. __ ::-

DOT-OST-1995-272 

formerly Docket 49233 

The Office of the Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and 

Proceedings ("Enforcement Office"), pursuant to Your Honor's March 22, 2006, Order 

staying this proceeding, files this report detailing the current status of this proceeding and 

settlement negotiations. 

The Department has not ruled on the outstanding motions filed by Respondents 

and opposed by the Enforcement Office in Ascend Aviation Group, Docket OST -2004-

17486. 
2 

There have been no further settlement discussions. 

Date: August 29,2014 

Respectfully submitted, 

/!;6df~ Blane Workie 

Acting Assistant General Counsel for 

Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings 

Vinh Q. Nguyen 

Senior Trial Attorney 

United States Department of Transportation 

Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Room 96-429 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL: 202-366-9342 

F~: 202-366-7152 
3 

Docket No. DOT-OST-1995-272 

I hereby certify that on this 29th day of August, 2014, a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing Status Report was served in the following manner to the following: 

Original 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building Ground Floor 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

By First Class Mail 

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL: (202) 366-2142 

FAX: (202) 366-7536 

By First Class Mail 

Scot Spencer 

SBD Aircraft Services 

255 S Leland Norton Way 

Sam Bernardino, CA 92408 

Scot Spencer 

22604 Esplanada Circle 

Boca Raton, Florida 33433
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T E Z Z - E L DIN MOH R AN , P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 71464 A ge nc yN o. A 095- 127- 237 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ay24, 2011 ** B efo re: P R E G E R S O N , T H O M A S , an dP A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. E zz -E l di n M oh ran, a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f E gypt , pet i t i on s pro se for r evi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order denyi ng hi s m ot i on t o reopen b a s e do n in e f

f e c tiv e a s s is tan c e o f

c o u n s e l. W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r8 U .S .C .



# FI LED JU N 09 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 71464 2 § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew for abu se of di sc re t i on the B IA ’ s deni alof a m ot i on t o reopen and r e vi e w de novo l e ga l a nd c ons t i tut i ona l c l a i m s , i nc l udi ng c l a i m s of i ne f f e c t i ve a s s is tan c e o f

c o u n s e l. Moh am m ed v. G on zales , 40 0 F . 3d 78 5, 79 1-92 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 5 ) . We g r an tth e p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. T he B I A abus e d i t s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng M ohr an’ s m ot i on t o r e ope n by r e qui r i ng s tr i c tc om pl i anc e w i th the pr oc e dur a l r e qui r e m e nt s s e tf orth i n M at te rof L oz ada , 19 I . & N . D e c . 637, 639 ( B I A 1988) . T he i ne f f e c t i ve a s s i s t anc e of Mo h r an ’ s p r i o rc o u n s e l wa s p l a i n o n th e f a c e o f th e r e c o r dwh e r e th e r e c o r ds h o ws pr i orc ouns e l m i s t a ke nl yf a i l e d t o r e que s tvol unt aryde partur e be f or e the im m ig r a tio n ju d g e is s u e dh is d e c is io n . Se e Ro dr i g u ez -La r i

zv . I NS , 282 F . 3d 1218, 1 2 2 7 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 2 ) . I n l i ghtof

ourdi s pos i t i on, w e ne e d notr e a c h M ohr an’ s r e m a i ni ng co n t en t i o n s. W e de nyM ohr an’ s m ot i on t o s ubm i te vi de nc e i nt o the r e c or d. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W GR AN T E D; RE MAND E D.
101.03.19 15:38 A C:\permftpx\lps6947\abouteow.htm --> permanent.access.gpo.gov /diska/netsite-docs/lps6947 abouteow.htm
101.03.19 15:39 A C:\permftpx\lps6947\abouteow.htm --> permanent.access.gpo.gov /diska/netsite-docs/lps6947 abouteow.htm
101.03.19 15:40 A C:\permftpx\lps6947\accred.htm --> permanent.access.gpo.gov /diska/netsite-docs/lps6947 accred.htm
101.03.19 15:41 A C:\permftpx\lps6947\ak.htm --> permanent.access.gpo.gov /diska/netsite-docs/lps6947 ak.htm
101.03.19 15:45 A C:\permftpx\lps6947\al.htm --> permanent.access.gpo.gov /diska/netsite-docs/lps6947 al.htm
<PAGE>
 
                                   EXHIBIT 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

The following is a list of the subsidiaries of the Company:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
 
                                            Place of
                  Subsidiary             Incorporation
       --------------------------------  -------------
<S>    <C>                               <C>
 1)    Candela Iberica, S.A.             Spain
 
 2)    Candela France S.A.R.L.           France
 
 3)    Candela K.K.                      Japan
 
 4)    Candela Laser (Deutschland) GmbH  Germany
 
 5)    Candela Skin Care Centers, Inc.   Massachusetts
 
</TABLE>