alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1950.105 Interest rate. ( a ) The Soldiers and Sailors Relief Act requires that the effective interest rate charged a borrower who enters active military duty after a loan is closed will not exceed 6 percent. This applies only to full-time active military duty and does not include military reserve status or National Guard participation.
( b ) As soon as the County Supervisor verifies that a borrower is on active duty, the County Supervisor will send the borrower a letter which states that the interest rate on the borrower's Rural Development loans will not exceed 6 percent. At the same time, the County Supervisor will send the Finance Office a memorandum which states that the borrower is on active duty and that interest of not more than 6 percent should accrue on the borrower's loans, effective as of the date of the memorandum or as of the date of the last payment, whichever is later, until further notice. If a borrower's interest rate on any loan is less than 6 percent, the loan will continue to accrue interest at the lower rate. The assistance under this section may not be retroactively applied.
( c ) As soon as the County Supervisor verifies that a borrower is no longer on active duty, the County Supervisor will send the Finance Office a memorandum advising them to terminate the 6 percent interest rate. The rate will revert to the note rate (or the payment assistance rate), effective with the next scheduled payment. The 6 percent interest rate will not be cancelled retroactively.
( d ) Additional directions for handling Single Family Housing Loans are contained in 7 CFR part 3550.
[52 FR 26134, July 13, 1987, as amended at 60 FR 55122, Oct. 27, 1995; 67 FR 78329, Dec. 24, 2002; 80 FR 9890, Feb. 24, 2015]
Case 7:20-cv-02945-MCR-HTC Document 20-11 Filed 08/09/22 Page 1 of 4
Case 7:20-cv-02945-MCR-HTC Document 20-11 Filed 08/09/22 Page 2 of 4
Case 7:20-cv-02945-MCR-HTC Document 20-11 Filed 08/09/22 Page 3 of 4
Case 7:20-cv-02945-MCR-HTC Document 20-11 Filed 08/09/22 Page 4 of 4
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CLAYTON RAYMOND AXE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 318 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 12th day of September, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
#### § 1783.3 What definitions are used in this regulation?

*Administrative expenses* means expenses incurred by a grant recipient that are of the type more particularly described in § 1783.12.

*Applicant* means a private, non-profit organization that applies for an RFP grant under this part.

*CONACT* means the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act.

*Eligible entity* means an entity eligible to obtain a loan, loan guarantee or grant under paragraph 1 or paragraph 2 of section 306(a) the CONACT (codified at 7 U.S.C. 1926(a)(1) and (2)).

*Funding opportunity announcement (FOA)* means a publicly available document by which a Federal agency makes know its intentions to award discretionary grants or cooperative agreements, usually as a result of competition for funds. FOA announcements may be known as program announcements, notices of funding availability, solicitations, or other names depending on the agency and type of program. FOA announcements can be found at *Grants.gov* in the Search Grants tab and on the funding agency's or program's website.

*Grant agreement* means the contract between RUS and the grant recipient which sets forth the terms and conditions governing a particular grant awarded under this part.

*Grant recipient* means a private, non-profit entity that has been awarded a grant under this part.

*Loan recipient* means an eligible entity that has received an RFP loan.

*Revolved funds* means the cash portion of the revolving loan fund that is not composed of RFP grant funds, including cash comprising repayments of RFP loans, fees relating to RFP loans and interest collected on RFP loans.

*Revolving loan fund* means the loan fund established by the grant recipient to carry out the purposes of this part, such fund comprising the proceeds of an RFP grant and other related assets.

*RFP* means Revolving Fund Program.

*RFP grant* means a grant from RUS to a grant recipient under this part.

*RFP loan* means a loan from a grant recipient using the direct or indirect proceeds of an RFP grant awarded under this part.

*Rural and rural area* means a city, town or unincorporated area that has a population of no more than 10,000 inhabitants, and which excludes certain populations pursuant to 7 U.S.C. 1991(a)(13)(H) and (I). The population figure is obtained from the most recent decennial Census of the United States (decennial Census).

*RUS* means the Rural Utilities Service, a Federal agency delivering the USDA's Rural Development Utilities Program.

*USDA* means the United States Department of Agriculture.

[69 FR 59772, Oct. 6, 2004, as amended at 80 FR 9864, Feb. 24, 2015; 83 FR 45034, Sept. 5, 2018; 87 FR 38643, June 29, 2022]
Editorial Note on Part 1980
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1980 appear at 80 FR 9905, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1980.1207 Approval to provide retail broadband service. ( a ) *Service area assessment.* For applicants requesting to provide retail broadband service under the special broadband authority, applications must be posted publicly for 45 days. ( 1 ) During the public notice period, service providers may voluntarily submit information required by the RUS Administrator onto the agency's mapping tool, or alternate methods if determined by the RUS Administrator under § 1980.1206(d). Information submitted by service providers shall be exempt from disclosure pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(2)(B).552.
( 2 ) If no broadband service provider submits information under paragraph (a)(1) of this section, the agency shall consider the number of providers in the proposed service area to be established by using any other data regarding the availability of broadband service that the RUS may collect or obtain through reasonable efforts.
( b ) *Use of funds.* After review of information submitted from service providers, if any, and all available data on broadband availability, if the RUS determines that the minimum acceptable level of broadband service is available in the proposed retail service area, the Awarding Agency shall not approve the use of funds for such purpose. The Awarding Agency, however, may approve the use of funds for retail broadband service if: ( 1 ) Areas with the minimum acceptable level of broadband service are eliminated from the proposed service area; and
( 2 ) The applicant covenants that it will not provide service in these areas with funds from the Awarding Agency.
( c ) *Use of Funds for wholesale broadband service.* For applicants requesting that funds be used for wholesale broadband service, the applicant must agree: ( 1 ) To publicly advertise in the service area that broadband service is available at wholesale to any service provider; and
( 2 ) That the same wholesale contract will be used for all service providers requesting wholesale service and offered at the same per unit price.
§ 215.8 Reimbursement payments. ( a ) [Reserved]
( b ) ( 1 ) The rate of reimbursement per half-pint of milk purchased and ( i ) served in nonpricing programs to all children;
( ii ) served to all children in pricing programs by institutions and School Food Authorities not electing to provide free milk; and
( iii ) served to children other than needy children in pricing programs by institutions and School Food Authorities electing to provide free milk shall be the rate announced by the Secretary for the applicable school year. However, in no event shall the reimbursement for each half-pint (236 ml.) of milk served to children exceed the cost of the milk to the school or child care institution.
( 2 ) The rate of reimbursement for milk purchased and served free to needy children in pricing programs by institutions and School Food Authorities electing to provide free milk shall be the average cost of milk, i.e., the total cost of all milk purchased during the claim period, divided by the total number of purchased half-pints.
( c ) Schools and child-care institutions having pricing programs shall use the reimbursement payments received to reduce the price of milk to children.
(Sec. 11, Pub. L. 95-166, 91 Stat. 1337 (42 U.S.C. 1772, 1753, 1766); sec. 5, Pub. L. 95-627, 92 Stat. 3619 (42 U.S.C. 1772); Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 1980, sec. 209, Pub. L. 96-499, 94 Stat. 2599; secs. 807 and 808, Pub. L. 97-35, 95 Stat. 521-535, 42 U.S.C. 1772, 1784, 1760; secs. 805 and 819, Pub. L. 97-35, 95 Stat. 521-535 (42 U.S.C. 1773))
[Amdt. 13, 39 FR 28416, Aug. 7, 1974, as amended by Amdt. 16, 43 FR 1060, Jan. 6, 1978; 44 FR 10700, Feb. 23, 1979; Amdt. 17, 44 FR 33047, June 8, 1979; 46 FR 51365, Oct. 20, 1981; Amdt. 23, 47 FR 14134, Apr. 2, 1982; 82 FR 56714, Nov. 30, 2017]
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

RONALD SATISH EMRIT, 

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:20-cv-34-AW-GRJ

BETSY DEVOS, DEFAULT 

RESOLUTION GROUP, NELNET and 

ACTION FINANCIAL SERVICES,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

I have considered the magistrate judge’s March 4, 2020 Report and 

Recommendation. ECF No. 6. I have also considered de novo the issues raised in 

Plaintiff’s “Notice of Appeal,” which I construe as objections to the Report and 

Recommendation. ECF No. 7. (If Plaintiff seeks to appeal this order to the Eleventh 

Circuit Court of Appeals, he must file a separate notice of appeal.)

I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. It is 

now ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 6) is adopted and

incorporated into this order.

2. The clerk will enter a judgment that says, “The complaint is dismissed

as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i).”
2

3. Plaintiff is warned that filing of frivolous lawsuits in this court may 

result in sanctions, including monetary sanctions and filing restrictions.

4. The clerk will close the file.

SO ORDERED on April 3, 2020.

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: July 2, 2015 106660 

________________________________

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF 

NEW YORK, 

Respondent, 

v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MICHAEL COXON, 

Appellant.

________________________________

Calendar Date: June 4, 2015

Before: Garry, J.P., Rose, Devine and Clark, JJ.

__________

Theodore J. Stein, Woodstock, for appellant.

Paul Czajka, District Attorney, Hudson (James A. Carlucci

of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Devine, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Columbia

County (Nichols, J.), rendered November 12, 2013, convicting

defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of failure to

register as a sex offender. 

After defendant neglected to register his change of address

within 10 days of moving, he was charged in a felony complaint

with failure to register as a sex offender. Pursuant to a

negotiated plea agreement, defendant waived indictment and

pleaded guilty to a superior court information charging him with

failure to register as a sex offender and waived his right to

appeal. County Court agreed to sentence defendant to no more

than one year in jail, but warned him that a greater sentence was

possible if he failed to appear for sentencing. Thereafter,
-2- 106660 

defendant failed to appear for sentencing, prompting County Court

to sentence defendant in abstentia to a prison term of 1 to 3

years. Defendant appeals. 

We are unpersuaded by defendant's contention that County

Court did not acquire jurisdiction to conduct the plea hearing. 

Although defendant points to the fact that the record does not

indicate, among other things, that the matter was held over for

grand jury action, "the transfer of [his] case to County Court is

evidence that he was held by a local criminal court for grand

jury action, and a mere void in the record is insufficient to

establish his claim" that the statutory requirements were not met

(People v Simmons, 110 AD3d 1371, 1372 [2013] [internal quotation

marks and citation omitted]). Additionally, the record

establishes that defendant not only waived a preliminary hearing,

but signed a waiver of indictment in open court, which was

consented to by the People, whereupon County Court executed an

order approving waiver of indictment. Given the presumption of

regularity accorded to judicial proceedings and the lack of any

evidence by defendant to rebut that presumption, we find the

waiver of indictment to be valid (see People v Simmons, 110 AD3d

at 1372-1373; People v Hauenstein, 106 AD3d 1339, 1339-1340

[2013], lv denied 21 NY3d 1042 [2013]).

Defendant's contention that the enhanced sentence is harsh

and excessive is not barred under the terms of his appeal waiver;

nevertheless, we find it to be without merit. 

Garry, J.P., Rose and Clark, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JONATHAN LEWIS,

# 131900598,

Plaintiff,

v. 4:20cv75–WS/MAF

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF

CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,

Defendant.

 

ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF

No. 13) docketed April 3, 2020. The magistrate judge recommends that Plaintiff’s

case be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and because Plaintiff’s

claims against the Florida Department of Children and Families are barred by the

Eleventh Amendment. Plaintiff has filed objections (ECF No. 15) to the report and

recommendation. 

Case 4:20-cv-00075-WS-MAF Document 17 Filed 05/08/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

The court has reviewed the record in light of Plaintiff’s objections and has

determined that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation should be

adopted. Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge’s report and recommendation (ECF No. 13) is

hereby ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order. 

2. The plaintiff's complaint and this action are DISMISSED for lack of

subject matter jurisdiction and because Plaintiff’s claims against the defendant,

Florida Department of Children and Families, are barred by the Eleventh

Amendment. 

3. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: "All claims are dismissed."

4. The clerk shall note on the docket that this case was dismissed pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(iii).

DONE AND ORDERED this 8th day of May , 2020.

s/ William Stafford 

WILLIAM STAFFORD

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 4:20-cv-00075-WS-MAF Document 17 Filed 05/08/20 Page 2 of 2
120 STAT. 332 PUBLIC LAW 109–217—APR. 13, 2006

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.J. Res. 82 (S.J. Res. 29):

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):

Apr. 4, considered and passed House.

Apr. 5, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–217

109th Congress

Joint Resolution

Providing for the reappointment of Alan G. Spoon as a citizen regent of the Board

of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That, in accordance

with section 5581 of the Revised Statutes of the United States

(20 U.S.C. 43), the vacancy on the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution, in the class other than Members of Congress,

occurring by reason of the expiration of the term of Alan G. Spoon

of Massachusetts on May 4, 2006, is filled by the reappointment

of the incumbent for a term of 6 years. The reappointment shall

take effect on May 5, 2006.

Approved April 13, 2006.

Effective date.

Apr. 13, 2006

[H.J. Res. 82]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

ALVIN WASHINGTON,

Appellant

v.

PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS,

Appellee

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 73 MAP 2019

Appeal from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court at No. 260 

MD 2019 dated July 17, 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM DECIDED: October 21, 2020

AND NOW, this 21st day of October, 2020, the order of the Commonwealth Court 

is AFFIRMED.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1948

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1948 appear at 80 FR 9888, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1948.60 Delegation and redelegation of authority.

The Rural Development State Director is responsible for implementing the authorities contained in this subpart and may issue State supplements redelegating these authorities to appropriate Rural Development employees.
#### §§ 2003.27-2003.50 [Reserved]
§ 205.672 Emergency pest or disease treatment. When a prohibited substance is applied to a certified operation due to a Federal or State emergency pest or disease treatment program and the certified operation otherwise meets the requirements of this part, the certification status of the operation shall not be affected as a result of the application of the prohibited substance: *Provided,* That: ( a ) Any harvested crop or plant part to be harvested that has contact with a prohibited substance applied as the result of a Federal or State emergency pest or disease treatment program cannot be sold, labeled, or represented as organically produced; and
( b ) Any livestock that are treated with a prohibited substance applied as the result of a Federal or State emergency pest or disease treatment program or product derived from such treated livestock cannot be sold, labeled, or represented as organically produced: *Except,* That: ( 1 ) Milk or milk products may be sold, labeled, or represented as organically produced beginning 12 months following the last date that the dairy animal was treated with the prohibited substance; and
( 2 ) The offspring of gestating mammalian breeder stock treated with a prohibited substance may be considered organic: *Provided,* That, the breeder stock was not in the last third of gestation on the date that the breeder stock was treated with the prohibited substance.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2047 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to eliminate the five-month 

waiting period in the disability insurance program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 17, 2013 

Mr. ISRAEL (for himself and Mr. CARTWRIGHT) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to eliminate 

the five-month waiting period in the disability insurance 

program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Social Security Dis5 ability Insurance for the Terminally Ill Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF TITLE II WAITING PERIOD FOR 

7 TERMINALLY ILL INDIVIDUALS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 223(a)(1) of the Social 

9 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 423(a)(1)) is amended by adding 

10 at the end the following new sentence: ‘‘In the case of any 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2047 IH

1 application for disability insurance benefits filed by an in2 dividual who is determined to be under a disability and 

3 who has been certified as terminally ill by a physician (as 

4 defined in section 1861(r)(1)), this paragraph shall be ap5 plied without regard to any waiting period. For the pur6 poses of the preceding sentence, an individual is consid7 ered to be terminally ill if the individual has a medical 

8 prognosis that the individual’s life expectancy is 12 

9 months or less.’’. 

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

11 this section shall take effect with respect to applications 

12 filed after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 32**     The following certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350 and in accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8238. These certifications shall not bedeemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, norshall they be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of1933, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any generalincorporation language in such filing.**Certification of Principal Executive Officer**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Volcom, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, tohis knowledge, that:     (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period endedSeptember 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     Dated: November 10, 2006 /s/ Richard R. Woolcott         Richard R. Woolcott    President, Chief Executive Officer and Director    (Principal Executive Officer)  **Certification of Principal Financial Officer**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Volcom, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies, tohis knowledge, that:     (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period endedSeptember 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     Dated: November 10, 2006 /s/ Douglas P. Collier         Douglas P. Collier    Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer    (Principal Financial Officer)       A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toVolcom, Inc. and will be retained by Volcom, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.