alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
3M Environmental, Health and Safety Operations 3M Center, Building 0224-05-W-03 St. Paul, MN 55144-1000 

### RECEIVED OPPT CBIC**201~**

## SEP 30**A~lll:** 

## 50 September 18,2014

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency EPA Docket Center Docket AR-226, Mail Code 28221T 1200 PennsylvaniaAve., N.W. Washington, DC 20460 Attention: OPPT Docket No. AR-226 Federal Express

Subject: Environmental Assessment ofPerfluoroalkyl Sulfonates at the 3M Decatur, Alabama Manufacturing Site Dear Sir orMadam: CBIC Control Number 

## 362022

On October24, 2004, U.S. EPA and the 3M Company enteredinto a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to execute a Screening Level Human Exposure Assessment for perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA). This program requiredthat various environmental mediaon and offthe 3M Decatur, Alabama manufacturing site be sampled and analyzed as defined by anextensive work plan. The last phase ofthis study was completed and summarized in a repott submitted last year to U.S. EPA entitled "Addendumto the Data Assessment Report". Accordingly, all commitments under this program have been fulfilled and the entire program is documented in the Electronic Docket OPPT2004 0112. Since the 3MDecatur sitealso was used for the manufacture ofperfluoroalkyl sulfonates, 3Mvoluntarily conducted a separate enviromnental monitoring program of substances that had been or were being manufactured at the site. The substances that were included in this envirorunental monitoring program were perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), perfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHS) and perfluorobutane sulfonate (PFBS). Enclosed is a report entitled "Addendumto the Perfluorinated Sulfonates Data Report"that presents the perfluorinated sulfonates results for samples collected under the aforementioned final phase ofthe MOU program. The analytical data and environmental assessment ofthis monitoring effort are being submitted to the AR-226 Docketto augment information pertaining to fluorochemicals at this location. The report is being submitted in hard copy and electronic (CD) formats. It should be noted that 3M has entered into an agreement with the Alabama Department ofEnvironmental Managementto execute a project ofcapping the former sludge incorporation fields onthe plant site. This project includes the installation ofa protective liner over the fields that is then covered with two feet ofclean soils toU.S. EPA Docket Center September 18,2014 Page 2

support growth ofnatural vegetation. Significant progress has been made on this multiyear effort. Several additional mitigationmeasures have also eitherbeen completed or undertaken to reduce potential releases to the environment. Ifthere are any questions orcomments concerning this matter, please contact me at (651) 737-3570 or gahohenstein@mmm.com. Regards,

1(1 

## ·f 

# Xltt?; t

. I Gary

# l. Hohenstein ManagerofEnvironmental and Regulatory Afiairs 3M Center, Building 224-5W-03 St. Paul, MN 55133 Enclosure

cc: Toni Krasnic- Mail Code 7405M (with enclosures)
Wyoming Nitrate Contribution to Wind Cave

Worst

site Year modelrun param N SReg PT AF MV Nat Area Total

WICA1 2002 plan02c36k PN3 24 WY 0.1116875 0.0003833 0.0919708 0.0048917 0.0194875 0.2284208

Wyoming's 2002 Contribution (20% Worst) to Nitrate at Wind Cave = 0.23 divided by 1.3, or 18%

Best

site Year modelrun param N SReg PT AF MV Nat Area Total

WICA1 2002 plan02c36k PN3 23 WY 0.1782217 0.0003087 0.1103739 0.0071522 0.0428261 0.3388826

Wyoming's 2002 Contribution (20% Best) to Nitrate at Wind Cave = 0.34 divided by 1, or 34%
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

KYLE R. HUTCHINS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-576

[July 18, 2019]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Jeffrey J. Colbath, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 2007CF010381A.

Kyle R. Hutchins, Madison, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LEVINE, C.J., MAY and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### § 1822.276 Subsequent RHS loans.

A subsequent RHS loan is an RHS loan to an applicant indebted for an initial RHS loan. Subsequent RHS loans will be made on the same basis as initial RHS loans.
#### In the Matter of Frank E. Leonard, Jr., an Attorney, Respondent. Bar Association on Nassau County, New York, Inc., Petitioner.

This is a proceeding to discipline respondent, an attorney, for professional misconduct. He was admitted to practice law by this court on June 23, 1954. The charges against respondent -concern his conduct as sole executor under a will which was admitted to probate in Kings County on May 17, 1963. In his answer to the petition, submitted by counsel, he alleges that he has “voluntarily suspended himself from the practice of law” since September 28, 1966; and he requests *inter alia*that he be indefinitely suspended until further order of this court. The specifications in the petition are that he unlawfully commingled with his own funds and converted to his own use $7,928.61 belonging to the decedent’s estate between August 19, 1963 and April 8, 1964; he failed to reply to inquiries made by representatives of a residuary legatee; and he falsely informed a representative of the New York State Bar Association twice in 1965 that he had rendered accountings. The alleged acts of misconduct are such as to warrant more severe disciplinary action than is directed herewith. However, taking into account the illness of respondent and his present confinement in a Veterans’ Administration Hospital, we deem it proper to suspend him until further order of the court. Respondent is suspended from the practice of law until further order of this court, effective forthwith. Beldoek, P. J., Rabin, Benjamin, Munder and Nolan, JJ., concur.
EX-10(XCV)



 






Exhibit 10 (xcv)




AMENDMENT

TO THE

NACCO MATERIALS HANDLING GROUP, INC.

UNFUNDED BENEFIT PLAN

(As Amended and Restated Effective September 1, 2000)




     NACCO Materials Handling Group, Inc. hereby adopts this Amendment to the NACCO Materials
Handling Group, Inc. Unfunded Benefit Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective September 1, 2000)
(the “Plan”), to be effective as of January 1, 2004. Words used herein with initial capital
letters which are defined in the Plan are used herein as so defined.



Section 1




     Section 2.2(a) of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:



     “(a) ROTCE means the Company’s consolidated return on total capital employed
(excluding NMHG Retail Adjustments) for the applicable time period calculated as follows:



     Earnings Before Interest After-Tax (after NMHG Retail Adjustments)


                                                                divided by




     Total Capital Employed (after NMHG Retail Adjustments)”



Section 2




     Section 2.2(b)(vi) of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:




     “(vi) ‘NMHG Retail Adjustments’ is defined as adjustments to consolidated net income
before extraordinary items and cumulative effect of accounting changes, Consolidated Interest
Expense, consolidated shareholder’s equity and Consolidated Debt to exclude: the sum of (A) the
results of the Company’s retail division as determined under US GAAP plus (B) the
corresponding consolidated eliminations related to the inclusions of Company’s retail division as
determined by US GAAP, plus (C) the debt and related interest expense recorded by the
Company related to loans to the Company’s retail division.”



     EXECUTED this 24th day of March, 2004.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	NACCO MATERIALS HANDLING GROUP, INC.
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	

	 	 	 	By:
	 	/s/ Charles A. Bittenbender
	

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	

	 	 	 	Title:
	 	 Assistant Secretary






1

- -
#### The State ex rel. Wilson, Appellant, *v.*Trimble, Admr., et al., Appellees.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Wilson v. Trimble*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 334.]

(No. 96-292

Submitted August 19, 1998

Decided October 7, 1998.)

*Cox & Stein, P.C.,*and *Edward J. Cox, Sr.,*for appellant.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *William A Thorman III,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

*335The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Douglas and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1992 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1992

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            December 12 (legislative day, December 11), 2013

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To amend the requirements relating to assessment of Israel's 
    qualitative military edge over military threats, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Israel QME Enhancement Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO REQUIREMENTS RELATING TO ASSESSMENT OF ISRAEL'S 
              QUALITATIVE MILITARY EDGE OVER MILITARY THREATS.

    (a) Assessment Required; Reports.--Section 201 of Public Law 110-
429 (122 Stat. 4843; 22 U.S.C. 2776 note) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``an ongoing basis'' and 
        inserting ``a biennial basis''; and
            (2) in subsection (c)(2)--
                    (A) in the heading, by striking ``Quadrennial'' and 
                inserting ``Biennial''; and
                    (B) in the text, by striking ``Not later than four 
                years after the date on which the President transmits 
                the initial report under paragraph (1), and every four 
                years thereafter,'' and inserting ``Not later than one 
                year after the date of the enactment of the Israel QME 
                Enhancement Act, and biennially thereafter,''.
    (b) Report.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 90 days after the date of 
        the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of State shall submit 
        to the appropriate congressional committees a report on--
                    (A) the range of cyber and asymmetric threats posed 
                to Israel by state and non-state actors; and
                    (B) the joint efforts of the United States and 
                Israel to address the threats identified in 
                subparagraph (A).
            (2) Form.--The report required under paragraph (1) shall be 
        submitted in unclassified form, but may contain a classified 
        annex.
            (3) Appropriate congressional committees defined.--In this 
        subsection, the term ``appropriate congressional committees'' 
        means the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the House of 
        Representatives and the Committee on Foreign Relations of the 
        Senate.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 11, 2013.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Order entered November 14, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 01066
- CV SHELLY MARIE TRIGG, Appellant

V. CHRISTOPHER D UNBAR, AS TRUSTEE OF THE CHRIS AND PAIG E DUNBAR FAMILY TRUS T, Appellee On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 401
- 01748
- 2019



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s November 13, 2019 unopposed second motion for an
extension of time to file h er brief on the merits. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to December 9, 2019 . We caution appellant that further extension requests in this accelerated appeal will be disfavored.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1928 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1928

  To clarify the calculation of cohort default rates for proprietary 
  institutions of higher education under the Higher Education Act of 
                                 1965.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 9, 2013

 Ms. DeLauro (for herself, Mr. Grijalva, Ms. Schwartz, and Mr. Takano) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                      Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To clarify the calculation of cohort default rates for proprietary 
  institutions of higher education under the Higher Education Act of 
                                 1965.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Proprietary Institution of Higher 
Education Accountability Act''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF COHORT DEFAULT RATE.

    Section 435(m)(1) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1085(m)(1)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B), by inserting after the first 
        sentence the following: ``In calculating the cohort default 
        rate for a proprietary institution of higher education, the 
        Secretary shall treat current and former students at the 
        institution who have been granted, on loans made under part D 
        and received for attendance at the institution, a forbearance 
        or deferment described in subparagraph (D) for any period 
        exceeding 6-months after entering repayment on such loans and 
        before the end of the second fiscal year following the fiscal 
        year in which such students entered such repayment, as students 
        who have defaulted on such loans before the end of such second 
        fiscal year.''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(D) For purposes of subparagraph (B)--
                            ``(i) the term `forbearance' means a 
                        forbearance granted for a reason described in 
                        subparagraph (A)(i)(II) or subparagraph (B) of 
                        section 428(c)(3); and
                            ``(ii) the term `deferment' means a 
                        deferment granted for a reason described in 
                        subparagraph (B) or (D) of section 
                        455(f)(2).''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1


                   AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT



         The Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement is made as of 
November 3, 1997, by and between F & M Bancorporation, Inc., ("F & M") and 
John W. Johnson of Kaukauna, Wisconsin ("Employee").

         WHEREAS, Employee has served as President and Chief Operating Officer 
of F & M; and

         WHEREAS, Employee has been elected as Chief Executive Officer of F & M
by its Board of Directors as of November 3, 1997; and

         THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

         1.       Change in Title.  Employee's title is changed to President 
and Chief Executive Officer effective November 3, 1997.

         2.       No Other Changes.  Except as modified herein, the Employment 
Agreement between the parties effective as of July 14, 1997, remains unchanged 
and in full force and effect.


                                            F & M BANCORPORATION, INC.

                                            By: /s/ Gail E. Janssen
                                               --------------------------------
                                                     Gail E. Janssen, Chairman
                                                     of the Board


                                            EMPLOYEE


                                            By: /s/ John W. Johnson
                                               --------------------------------
                                                     John W. Johnson
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2014 

To repeal section 2703(c)(2)(C) of title 18, United States Code. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 16, 2013 

Mr. AMASH (for himself, Ms. LOFGREN, Mr. MULVANEY, and Mr. POLIS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

A BILL 

To repeal section 2703(c)(2)(C) of title 18, United States 

Code. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Telephone Records 

5 Protection Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL. 

7 Subparagraph (C) of section 2703(c)(2) of title 18, 

8 United States Code, is repealed. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1989 

To require the Forest Service to accommodate, to the extent consistent 

with the management objectives and limitations applicable to the National 

Forest System lands at issue, individuals with mobility disabilities who 

need to use a power-driven mobility device for reasonable access to 

such lands. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 15, 2013 

Mr. ALEXANDER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture, and in addition to the Committee on Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To require the Forest Service to accommodate, to the extent 

consistent with the management objectives and limitations applicable to the National Forest System lands 

at issue, individuals with mobility disabilities who need 

to use a power-driven mobility device for reasonable access to such lands. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1989 IH

1 SECTION 1. ACCOMMODATION OF ACCESS NEEDS OF INDI2 VIDUALS WITH MOBILITY DISABILITIES 

3 UNDER FOREST SERVICE TRAVEL MANAGE4 MENT RULE. 

5 (a) CONSIDERATION OF ACCESS NEEDS OF INDIVID6 UALS WITH MOBILITY DISABILITIES.—The Secretary of 

7 Agriculture, acting through the Chief of the Forest Serv8 ice, shall require Forest Service personnel, in imple9 menting off-road vehicle management under the Forest 

10 Service Travel Management Rule, to endeavor to accom11 modate, to the extent consistent with the management ob12 jectives and limitations applicable to the National Forest 

13 System lands at issue, individuals with mobility disabilities 

14 who would need to use a power-driven mobility device for 

15 reasonable access to such lands. 

16 (b) RESPONSE TO REQUESTS FOR ACCESS.—If, after 

17 receiving a request by or on behalf of an individual with 

18 mobility disabilities for permission to use a power-driven 

19 mobility device to access specific National Forest System 

20 lands, Forest Service personnel determine that use of such 

21 a power-driven mobility device is not appropriate given the 

22 management objectives and limitations applicable to the 

23 National Forest System lands at issue, the Forest Service 

24 personnel shall provide the individual with a written reVerDate Mar 15 2010 06:40 May 17, 2013 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H1989.IH H1989

tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1989 IH

1 sponse containing an explanation of the reasons for the 

2 determination. 

Æ 


tjames on DSK6SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.2**

**AFFINITY GROUP HOLDING, INC.**

**STATEMENT PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

I,Thomas F. Wolfe, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of AffinityGroup Holding, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify asfollows:

1.                                       This statement is provided pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350 in connection with the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 (the “Periodic Report”);

2.                                       The Periodic Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

3.                                       The information contained in the PeriodicReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company as of dates and for the periods indicatedtherein.
| Date: May 9, 2007 |
|-------------------|
|              |
|              |
|              | /s/ Thomas F. Wolfe |   |
|              | Thomas F. Wolfe |
|              | Senior Vice President and |
|              | Chief Financial Officer |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, or suchother document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thewritten statement as required by Section 906, has been provided to AffinityGroup Holding, Inc. and will be retained by Affinity Group Holding, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

1

----
Amendment to Employment Agreement--WIlliam F. Hogg, Jr.



 EXHIBIT 10.23(G) 
  
 AMENDMENT 
 TO 
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
  
 THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is made January 10, 2005 by and between Valassis Communications, Inc. (the
“Corporation”) and William F. Hogg, Jr. (the “Executive”). 
  
 WHEREAS, the Corporation and the Executive entered into that certain Employment Agreement effective as of March 18, 1992, as amended on December 22, 1995, January 20, 1997, December 23, 1998 and January 5,
2001, January 11, 2002, July 8, 2002 and January 13, 2004 (the “Employment Agreement”); and 
  
 WHEREAS, the Corporation and the Executive desire to amend the Employment Agreement to extend the term of employment under the Employment
Agreement. 
  
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the above
recitals, the parties hereto agree as set forth below. 
  
 1. The
first sentence of Section 3(a) of the Employment Agreement shall be amended to read as follows: 
  
 “The Executive’s Annual Base Salary (“Annual Base Salary”), payable on a biweekly basis, shall be at the annual rate
of not less than $290,000 effective January 1, 2005.” 
  
 2.
All other terms of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 







 3. This instrument, together with the Employment Agreement, contains the entire agreement of the parties
with respect to the subject matter hereof. 
  
 IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the Executive and the Corporation have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the day and year first above written. 
  

			
	 VALASSIS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Barry P. Hoffman


	 Name:
	 	 Barry P. Hoffman

	 Title:
	 	 Executive Vice President and Legal Counsel

		
	 	 	 /s/ William F. Hogg, Jr.


	 	 	 William F. Hogg, Jr.



  

 2
#### Ronald Morse et al., Appellants, v County of Herkimer et al., Respondents.

(Appeal No. 2.)

— Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. (See *Teller v Fairchild,*67 AD2d 1105.) (Appeal from judgment of Herkimer Supreme Court — automobile negligence.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Cardamone, Simons, Callahan and Moule, JJ.