alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2008-2011 Non-road Mobile Emissions Reductions (categories for which NONROAD Model was used to estimate emissions) (pounds per summer day)

Total VOC Total VOC 2008 2011

AGRICULTURAL EQUIPMENT 33.2 28.2 -5 COMMERCIAL EQUIPMENT 3661.8 3432.4 -229.4 CONSTRUCTION AND MINING EQUIPMENT 1510.4 1327 -183.4 INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT 1623.8 982.2 -641.6 LAWN AND GARDEN EQUIPMENT (COM) 6518.6 5906 -612.6 LAWN AND GARDEN EQUIPMENT (RES) 7397 7067.4 -329.6 LOGGING EQUIPMENT 24.4 25.2 0.8 PLEASURE CRAFT 15537.8 13717.6 -1820.2 RAILROAD EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 RECREATIONAL EQUIPMENT 4153 4030.4 -122.6

TOTALS (ppsd) 40460 36532.8 -3927.2 TOTALS (tpsd) 20.2 18.3 -2.0 9.7% reduction

Total NOx Total NOx 2008 2011

AGRICULTURAL EQUIPMENT 280.2 256.2 -24 COMMERCIAL EQUIPMENT 2731 2613 -118 CONSTRUCTION AND MINING EQUIPMENT 10417.2 9232.2 -1185 INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT 7392 5061.2 -2330.8 LAWN AND GARDEN EQUIPMENT (COM) 1805.8 1715.2 -90.6 LAWN AND GARDEN EQUIPMENT (RES) 669.4 633.8 -35.6 LOGGING EQUIPMENT 44 33.4 -10.6 PLEASURE CRAFT 2037.8 2222.4 184.6 RAILROAD EQUIPMENT 0 0 0 RECREATIONAL EQUIPMENT 253.8 261.8 8

TOTALS (ppsd) 25631.2 22029.2 -3602 TOTALS (tpsd) 12.8 11.0 -1.8 14.1% reduction2008-2011 Non-road Mobile Emissions Reductions (categories for which NONROAD Model was used to estimate emissions)

% reduction

% reduction
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsDevelopment of a quadrupole-based Secondary-Ion Mass Spectrometry (SIMS) system at Lewis Research CenterThe design, construction, and initial use of an ion microprobe to carry out secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) of solid samples is reported. The system is composed of a differentially pumped custom-made UHV (Ultra High Vacuum) chamber, a quadrupole mass spectrometer and a telefocus A-DIDA ion gun with the capability of producing beams of Cesium, as well as inert and reactive gases. The computer control and acquisition of the data were designed and implemented using a personal computer with plug-in boards, and external circuitry built as required to suit the system needs. The software is being developed by using a FORTH-like language. Initial tests aimed at characterizing the system, as well as preliminary surface and depth-profiling studies are presently underway.Document ID19900014160Acquisition SourceLegacy CDMSDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsVargas-Aburto, Carlos*(Kent State Univ. OH., United States)*Aron, Paul R.*(NASA Lewis Research Center Cleveland, OH., United States)*Liff, Dale R.*(Kent State Univ. OH., United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 6, 2013Publication DateJune 1, 1990Subject CategoryChemistry And Materials (General)Report/Patent NumberNASA-TM-102531E-5341NAS 1.15:102531Accession Number90N23476Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 506-41-11Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType19900014160.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, SEVENTH DISTRICT, AT AMARILLO

No. 07-14-00050-CV

Dennis Helbert, Individually and as Independent

Executor of the Estate of Norma Irene Helbert

v.

Gary Helbert

(No. B36605-0904 IN 242ND DISTRICT COURT OF HALE COUNTY)

Type of Fee Charges Paid By

Motion fee

Motion fee

Motion fee

Statewide efiling fee

Indigent

Filing

Supreme Court chapter 51 fee

$10.00

$10.00

$10.00

$20.00

$25.00

$100.00

$50.00

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

E-PAID

Stephen E Haynes

Stephen E Haynes

Melanie Calfin

Stephen E Haynes

Stephen E Haynes

Stephen E Haynes

Stephen E Haynes

Balance of costs owing to the Seventh Court of Appeals, Amarillo, Texas: $0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per

the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, VIVIAN LONG, CLERK OF THE SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE

STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of

the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS,

showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears

of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand

and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for the

Seventh District of Texas on March 10, 2015.

Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK

FILE COPY
Phantom 3 Pre-Flight Inspection Check List

Pre-Flight Check List

ο Visual inspection for defects

ο Batteries fully charged and checked - Transmitter, UAS, iPad, iPhone, approved/compatible device

ο Props tightened and locked

ο SD card in camera

ο Lens cap removed (As necessary)

ο Antennae up and parallel

ο Transmitter turned on (press once, release, then press and hold for 3 seconds)

ο Ensure Transmitter is in P Mode

ο UAS turned on (press once, release, then press and hold for 3 seconds)

ο Flick the transformation switch on transmitter up and down 4 times quickly to convert from travel mode to flight mode or use the app

ο DJI Pilot app quit and restarted, no other running apps on iPad

ο Tap bar at top of app (Safe to Fly GPS) for full status

ο Maps are cached (move the map around, zoom in an out)

ο Minimum return height adjusted (check for tallest object and set accordingly)

ο UAS placed in safe launch and recover position

ο Home point reprogrammed via app

ο Area clear of people / obstructions

Flight Check List

ο Hover close for 20 seconds. Look / Listen for defects

ο Confirm expected stick operation

ο Monitor battery power

ο Monitor signal strength

ο Keep line-of-sight with UAS 

o Ensure area/zone of intended flight path is clear of other aerial traffic.

o Ensure area/zone of intended flight path is clear of any electrical/power lines

o Ensure atmospheric conditions are optimal for safe operation of UAV/UAS

o Select a safe zone to “ditch” the UAV/UAS in the event an emergency landing is required
SUMMARY OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION



  
 Exhibit 10.13

  
 Summary of Directors’ Compensation 

 
 For 2005, outside directors serving on the Board of Directors of Albemarle
Corporation will be paid $15,800 per quarter ($63,200 per year) for service as a director. In addition, directors will receive an annual amount based on their committee service: Audit Committee members will receive $9,000 and the Chairman of the
Audit Committee will receive an additional $6,000; Executive Compensation Committee members will receive $7,000 and the Chairman of the Executive Compensation Committee will receive an additional $4,500; and Nominating and Governance Committee
members will receive $5,000 and the Chairman of the Nominating and Governance Committee will receive an additional $3,000. Employee members of the Board of Directors are not paid separately for service on the Board of Directors. 
  

 84
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Glinton Dixon, Appellant.

Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 10, 1964 (reargument was denied by order of said court dated March 2, 1965), affirmed. The voluntariness of the statement used at trial was never in issue. Moreover, such a statement is properly used for the purpose of *741impeaching the credibility of a defendant *(People*v. *Kulis,*18 N Y 2d 318). Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 1740** 

GAIL E. PACE , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. CROSSMARK; DEBBIE RIDGEWAY , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District o f South Carolina , at Greenville
. Henry M. Herlong, Jr. , Senior District Judge. ( 6:10

- cv - 02797

- HMH )

Submitted : November 17, 2011 Decided: November 22, 2011

Before KING, DAVIS, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Gail E. Pace, Appellant Pro Se. Lucas James Asper, Thomas Howard Keim, Jr., FORD & HARRISON, LLP, Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Gail E . Pace appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss her claims pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e

- 17 (West 2003 & Supp. 20 11 )
. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1)(B) (West 2006 & Supp. 2011). The magistrate judge recommended that the complaint be dismissed and advised Pace that failure to timely file specific objections to this recommendation would waive ap pellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge's recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties hav e been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845

– 46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Pace has waived appellate review by failing to file specific objections after receiving proper notic e. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Exhibit
      32.1








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
      THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Chardan South China Acquisition
      Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007
      (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof, I Kerry Propper, Chief Executive Officer and Secretary of the Company,
      certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Kerry Propper
            
            Dated:
                August 14, 2007Kerry
                PropperChief
                Executive Officer and Secretary(Principal
                Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 10.25

                        CONVERSION ELECTION LETTER DATED
                        NOVEMBER 7, 2006 FROM HENRY ZAKS











<PAGE>



CHINA WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.



TO:               Henry Zaks

CC:               Mike Bowden
                  Robert Paradine

FROM:             Pete Racelis

DATE:             November 7, 2006

SUBJECT:          Payment of Loans

Henry:

Please see enclose stock  certificate for 1,078,632  shares of restricted  (Rule
144) company stock as conversion for the loans you've made as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Principal                       Interest                            Total                      Shares Issued
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                        <C>                               <C>                            <C>
           $10,000.00                      $545.95                           $10,545.95                       458,520
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            $4,127.00                      $196.96                            $4,323.96                       187,998
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            $1,400.00                       $61.79                            $1,461.79                        63,557
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            $3,600.00                      $121.61                            $3,721.61                       161,810
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            $4,708.00                       $47.16                            $4,755.16                       206,747
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                             $24,808.47                     1,078,632
                                                                ----------------------------------------------------------
</TABLE>


The total amount loaned to the company was  $24,808.47.  The conversion was made
at $0.023 per share which equals 1,078,632 shares of restricted stock.

Again, thank you very much for your support and patience.

Regards,

/s/ PEDRO E. RACELIS III



          1746 Cole Boulevard, Suite 225, Golden, Colorado 80401-3210,
                     Office 303.277.9968, Fax 303.484.3794
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                               18 U.S.C. SS.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Annual  Report of IR  BioSciences  Holdings,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
Wilhelm, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                        /s/ Michael Wilhelm
                                        -----------------------
                                        Chief Executive Officer

                                        November 16, 2005

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, an other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section  906,  has been  provided to Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

GAINESVILLE DIVISION

JASON MCNAIR,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:20-cv-19-AW-GRJ

DIXIE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, 

and THE STATE OF FLORIDA,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

I have considered the magistrate judge’s March 17, 2020 Report and 

Recommendation. ECF No. 8. No objections have been filed. And it appears that the 

Plaintiff is no longer in custody. ECF No. 5.

I have determined the Report and Recommendation should be adopted. It is 

now ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 8) is adopted and 

incorporated into this order.

2. The clerk will enter a judgment that says, “This case is dismissed for 

failure to prosecute.”

3. The clerk will close the file.

SO ORDERED on April 17, 2020.

s/ Allen Winsor

United States District Judge

Case 1:20-cv-00019-AW-GRJ Document 9 Filed 04/17/20 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 222 (Thursday, November 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 70679]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29055]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2009-N-0554]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office 
of Management and Budget Approval; Manufactured Food Regulatory Program 
Standards

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
collection of information entitled ``Manufactured Food Regulatory 
Program Standards'' has been approved by the Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel Gittleson, Office of 
Information Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., 
PI50-400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301-796-5156, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5f1b3e31363a337118362b2b333a2c30311f393b3e7137372c71383029"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fabe9b94939f96d4bd938e8e969f899594ba9c9e9bd4929289d49d958c">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of March 3, 2010 (75 
FR 9605), the agency announced that the proposed information collection 
had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 
3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays 
a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the 
information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0601. 
The approval expires on September 30, 2013. A copy of the supporting 
statement for this information collection is available on the Internet 
at http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.

    Dated: November 12, 2010.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-29055 Filed 11-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Page 1 of 2

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

DALE A. CASTRO,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:20cv2337/LAC/EMT

WARDEN C. MAIORANA,

Defendant.

__________________________/

O R D E R

The Chief Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation on May

19, 2020 (ECF No. 5). Plaintiff was furnished a copy of the Report and

Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title

28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined it

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:

1. The Chief Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No.

5) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

Case 3:20-cv-02749-LC-EMT Document 18 Filed 06/25/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

2. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim

upon which relief may be granted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and

§ 1915A(b)(1); and

3. The clerk of court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close

the case.

DONE AND ORDERED this 17th

 day of June, 2020.

 s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No. 3:20cv2337/LAC/EMT

Case 3:20-cv-02749-LC-EMT Document 18 Filed 06/25/20 Page 2 of 2
Editorial Note on Part 1925
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1925 appear at 80 FR 9876, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1925.3 Servicing taxes. ( a ) The County Supervisor will be responsible for ascertaining that all mortgaged real estate is listed properly for tax purposes.
( b ) The County Supervisor will be responsible for taking all actions in connection with taxes as may be necessary to protect the Government's security interests. Any unusual situations that may arise with respect to tax servicing should be referred to the State Office for consideration.
( c ) The County Supervisor will encourage each borrower to pay taxes promptly in order to avoid any penalties. Normally, this can be accomplished through routine servicing of loans by emphasizing the advantages of setting aside sufficient income to meet tax obligations when they become due. Taxes will be adequately budgeted for those borrowers with whom Form RD 431-2, “Farm and Home Plan,” is developed. Each borrower will be encouraged to notify the County Supervisor when he has paid his taxes. After the delinquent date, it will be necessary for the County Supervisor to determine the borrowers whose taxes are delinquent. The Multi-Family Housing Information System (MFIS) will be used in posting servicing actions on delinquent taxes.
[57 FR 36590, Aug. 14, 1992, as amended at 69 FR 69104, Nov. 26, 2004]
Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

LLOYD BAKER,

Plaintiff,

vs.

3M COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.

 Case No. 7:20cv39-MCR-GRJ

FINAL JUDGMENT

This action came before the Court for a jury trial with the Honorable M. Casey 

Rodgers presiding. The issues have been tried, resulting in a jury verdict in 

Plaintiff’s favor on June 18, 2021. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that final judgment is 

entered in favor of the Plaintiff, LLOYD BAKER, and against Defendants, 3M 

COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC, 

AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO LLC, and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES 

LLC, in the amount of $1,054,000, together with costs taxed against Defendants. 

JESSICA J. LYUBLANOVITS,

CLERK OF COURT

 June 21, 2021 /s/ Susan Simms

DATE Deputy Clerk: Susan Simms

Case 7:20-cv-00039-MCR-GRJ Document 186 Filed 06/21/21 Page 1 of 1
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 
33-13704 of Cistron Biotechnology, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated 
September 12, 1996 (which expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an 
explanatory paragraph relating to the Company's ability to continue as a 
going concern), appearing in this Annual Report on form 10-K of Cistron 
Biotechnology, Inc. for the year ended June 30, 1996.


/Deloitte & Touche LLP/
Parsippany, New Jersey
September 30, 1996
                                         47
<PAGE>