alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of American Tire Distributors Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby certifies that, to his best knowledge:



| | (a) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 3, 2010 (the Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |     |  |                      |  |                                                     
|------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|                    |  |     |  |                     
|                    |  |    
|Dated: May 12, 2010 |  | By: |  | /s/ WILLIAM E. BERRY
|                    |  |     |  | Name:                |  | William E. Berry                                    
|                    |  |     |  | Title:               |  | President and Chief Executive Officer               
|                    |  |     |  |                     
|                    |  |    
|                    |  | By: |  | /s/ DAVID L. DYCKMAN
|                    |  |     |  | Name:                |  | David L. Dyckman                                    
|                    |  |     |  | Title:               |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk February 8, 2013

s0205 

# Order

February 8, 2013

145967

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145967

COA: 305466

Saginaw CC: 10

- 034594

- FC

FRANK ARTHUR CROWELL,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 14, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. Defendant

argues t hat the warrantless search of the contents of his cell phone based solely on the

third

- party consent of the complainant violated his Fourth Amendment right against

unreasonable searches. See United States v Matlock , 415 US 164; 94 S Ct 988; 39 L Ed

2d 242 (1974). However, even if this evidence were to be suppressed, considering the

weight and strength of the untainted evidence presented at trial, the defendant cannot

demonstrate a reasonable probability that the result of the proceeding would have been

di fferent. People v Carines , 460 Mich 750 (1999).
|  | Lead in Drinking WaterRecent Additions | Contact Us | Print 							Version 							Search: 							EPA Home > 					Water > 					Ground Water & Drinking Water >					Lead in Drinking Water > Lead and Copper Rule > Lead and Copper Rule - Clarification of Requirements for Collecting Samples and Calculating Compliance - Fact Sheet |
|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

||
||
§ 1740.59 Application submission. ( a ) Applications must be submitted through the Agency's online application system.
( b ) The Agency may publish additional application submission requirements in a notice in the Federal Register.
( c ) Unless otherwise identified in the notice, applicants can only submit one application under any funding window.
From: Chebryll E d wards/RTP/USEPA/

To : "Higgins, Cortney" Cortney_Higgins@omb.e op.gov

C c : Laura Bunte/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Jan King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Gretchen

Graves/DC/USEPA/US@ EPA, Steve Fruh/RTP/USEPA/US@ EPA

Date : 1 2/14/2009 04:03

Subject: RE: Chem Prep and Prep

I will have Jan send it right away.

Also, I checked the OSHA/FDA related response. As far as we know, the requ irements we have

listed are not in conflict with the OSHA/FDA requirements. Per our request in the proposal, we

w anted to know from industry if the housekeeping measures we listed were industry standard or

if other things seemed more appropriate. As you can see in the comment, industry didn't really

r espond to our request specifically, but, instead just wanted us to keep the "standard" flexible.

Our OGC attorney's and enforcement staff were pretty adamant about us having specific

requirements included in the rule. I am not sure this answers your concern. If not, please give

me a call.

Thanks. C

Chebryll C. Edwards

Leader, Regulatory Development & Policy Analysis Group

USEPA/OAR/Office of Air Quality Planning & Stand ards

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

(919) 541

- 5428
#### §§ 1780.84-1780.86 [Reserved]
Exhibit (10)(P)(1)

List of Executive Officers who are parties to

Change in Control Agreements with Harleysville Group Inc.

in the form filed as Exhibit (10)(Q) with the Annual Report on Form 10-K

for the year ended December 31, 2007



Michael L. Browne, President Chief Executive Officer (1)

Mark R. Cummins, Executive Vice President, Chief Investment Officer and Treasurer

Allan R. Becker, Senior Vice President and Chief Actuary

Arthur E. Chandler, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Thomas E. Clark, Senior Vice President, Field Operations

Donna M. Dever, Senior Vice President, Performance Excellence

Robert A. Kauffman, Senior Vice President, Secretary, General Counsel and Chief Governance Officer

Theodore A. Majewski, Senior Vice President, Personal Lines (2)

Kevin M. Toth, Senior Vice President, Claims

Akhil Tripathi, Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer

Robert G. Whitlock Jr., Senior Vice President & Chief Underwriting Officer



_________________

(1)

Mr. Brownes agreement is substantially similar to the agreement with other executives except for the following: (a) the factor in Section 4(c)(ii)(b) is 2.999 instead of 2.000; (b) the period in (i) the last proviso to Section 1, (ii) the lead-in paragraph to Section 3, (iii) the lead-in paragraph to Section 3(c), and (iv) Section 4(c)(vii) is thirty-six (36) months instead of twenty-four months; (c) the Initial Expiration Date is December 31, 200[9], instead of December 31, 200[7]; and (d) in Section 1, the date January 1, 200[8] is January 1, 20[10].



(2)

Mr. Majewskis agreement has the following differences: (a) the factor in Section 4(c)(ii)(b) is 1.000 instead of 2.000; and (b) the period in (i) the last proviso to Section 1, (ii) the lead-in paragraph to Section 3, (iii) the lead-in paragraph to Section 3(c), and (iv) Section 4(c)(vii) is twelve (12) months instead of twenty-four months.
Exhibit 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection  with the report of Rokwader,  Inc. (the  "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  each of the undersigned,
in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,  hereby certifies,  pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
      Company.

/s/ Yale Farar
---------------------------------------
Yale Farar
President (Principal Executive Officer)
November 22, 2005


/s/ Mitchell W. Turk
---------------------------------------
Mitchell W. Turk
Chief Financial Officer
November 22, 2005
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION**     Pursuant to the requirements of Rules 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, James T. Posillico provides the following certification.     I, James T. Posillico, President and Chief Executive Officer of Vitro Diagnostics, Inc.(“Company”) certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of the Company;  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in the annual report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, andfor, the periods presented in this annual report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15-d-14) for the registrantand have designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Company is made know to me by others, particularly duringthe period in which this annual report is being prepared;  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the Company’sauditors and the audit committee of our board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation ofinternal controls which could adversely affect the Company’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial date and have identified forthe Company’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls, and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees which have a significant role in the Company’s internalcontrols; and 6. I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significantchanges in internal control or in other factors that could significantly affectinternal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including anycorrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.    Date: February 6, 2006    /s/ James T. Posillico     James T. Posillico, President and Chief
(April 21, 1969)

#### Algonquin Gas Transmission Company, Plaintiff, v. Henri Khoury et al., Respondents, and John F. Schuette et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

In a condemnation proceeding, defendants Schuette appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated March 19, 1968, as, on reargument, adhered to the original decision and directed that the $1,700 previously deposited by plaintiff condemnor with the Commissioner of Finance of Westchester County, as compensation for an easement over premises No. 6 Fairview Avenue, Yorktown Heights, in said county, be paid over to defendants Khoury, as owners in possession of the premises at the time of the taking thereof. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs, and proceeding remitted to the Special Term for a hearing and the allocation of the $1,700 condemnation compensation in accordance with the views herein set forth. The findings of fact below have not been affirmed. In our opinion, since no appeal was taken from the order of July 18, 1967, decreeing that plaintiff have title to the easement upon making a deposit of $1,700, plaintiff’s deposit of such sum represents the fair and reasonable total compensation for the easement taken in the subject premises *(Algonquin Gas Transmission Co.*v. *Galli,*31 A D 2d 937). This $1,700 sum must be divided between (1) respondents Khoury for the consequential damage sustained by the land during their possession and ownership and (2) appellants Schuette for the value of the easement finally acquired by plaintiff during the Schuette ownership, as of July 18, 1967 *(Algonquin Gas Transmission Co.*v. *Galli, supra).*Since the instant record fails to detail the damage to the land actually sustained, and the reasonable value of the restoration thereof, recoverable by respondents, and fails to sustain any valuation of the easement, binding upon appellants, the proceeding should be remitted to Special Term to take *548proof upon these issues, and to apportion the $1,700 in issue, as shall appear appropriate, in accordance with the formula fixed in the case cited above. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2**Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906**In connection with the quarterly report of Orchids Paper Products Company (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Keith R. Schroeder, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 ofTitle 18 of the United States Code, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.       /s/ Keith R. Schroeder Keith R. Schroeder    Chief Financial Officer    May 2, 2008
October 31, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NEW CONCEPT TRADE INCORPORATED AKA AND DBA NEW CONCEPT 

TRADE, INC., NEW CONCEPT TRADE, AND SHEHZAD SADARUDDIN 

AKA AND BSPA SHEHZAD SADWDDIN, Appellants

NO. 14-13-00601-CV V.

QUALITY KING FRAGRANCE, INC. DBA QUALITY FRAGRANCE GROUP, 

Appellee

________________________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

judgment signed by the court below on May 9, 2013. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellants, New Concept Trade Incorporated AKA and DBA New Concept Trade, 

Inc., New Concept Trade, and Shehzad Sadaruddin AKA and BSPA Shehzad 

Sadwddin, jointly and severally.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALLAHASSEE DIVISION

JAMI CLAIRE et al.,

Plaintiffs,

v. Case No.: 4:20cv20-MW/MAF

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF

MANAGEMENT SERVICES, et al.,

Defendants.

________________________________/

ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING

This Court recognizes that the cross-motions for summary judgment in this 

case have been pending for longer than usual for most cases on this Court’s docket. 

Given the passage of time and the development of law in this Circuit and elsewhere 

concerning some of the claims at issue in this case, this Court offers the parties a 

final opportunity to file supplemental briefs on any issue now pending before this 

Court before it takes the motions under advisement. 

The parties must confer on or before Friday, May 3, 2024, as to whether 

they intend to file any supplemental briefing. If either side desires to file anything 

further with respect to the pending motions, they must file a proposed briefing 

Case 4:20-cv-00020-MW-MAF Document 164 Filed 04/25/24 Page 1 of 2
2

schedule for this Court’s review on or before Wednesday, May 8, 2024.

SO ORDERED on April 25, 2024.

s/Mark E. Walker 

Chief United States District Judge

Case 4:20-cv-00020-MW-MAF Document 164 Filed 04/25/24 Page 2 of 2
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

K.A., the Mother,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES

and GUARDIAN AD LITEM,

Appellees.

No. 4D21-1514

[January 5, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Stacey Schulman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2020-1291DP.

Antony P. Ryan, Regional Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil 

Regional Counsel, and Richard G. Bartmon, Assistant Regional Counsel, 

West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carolyn Schwarz, 

Assistant Attorney General, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee Department of 

Children and Families. 

Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Sarah Todd 

Weitz, Senior Attorney, Appellate Division, Tallahassee, for appellee

Guardian ad Litem.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING AND MOTION TO 

CERTIFY QUESTIONS OF GREAT PUBLIC IMPORTANCE

PER CURIAM.

We deny Appellant’s motion for rehearing. 

We grant the motion to certify questions of great public importance. As 

we noted in V.S. v. Dep’t of Child. & Fams., 322 So. 3d 1229 (Fla. 4th DCA 

2021), “[t]he constitutionality of the 2014 amendment to section 

39.806(1)(f), Florida Statutes, affects fundamental parental interests.” Id.

at 1230. We once again certify the following question to the supreme 

court:
2

DOES THE 2014 AMENDMENT TO SECTION 39.806(1)(f), 

FLORIDA STATUTES, WHICH PROVIDES THAT NO PROOF 

OF NEXUS BETWEEN EGREGIOUS CONDUCT TOWARDS 

ONE CHILD IS REQUIRED TO TERMINATE THE PARENTAL 

RIGHTS OF THE CHILD’S SIBLINGS, UNCONSTITUTIONALLY 

REMOVE THE STATE’S BURDEN TO PROVE THAT THE 

EGREGIOUS CONDUCT POSES A SUBSTANTIAL RISK OF 

HARM TO EACH SIBLING AND IS THE LEAST RESTRICTIVE 

MEANS OF PROTECTING THE SIBLING(S) FROM SERIOUS 

HARM?

Moreover, we certify the following question concerning the 

constitutionality of section 39.806(1)(l), Florida Statutes:

DOES THE 2008 ADDITION OF SUBPARAGRAPH (l) TO 

SECTION 39.806(1), FLORIDA STATUTES, WHICH 

PROVIDES FOR TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS 

WHEN “ON THREE OR MORE OCCASIONS THE CHILD OR 

ANOTHER CHILD OF THE PARENT OR PARENTS HAS BEEN 

PLACED IN OUT-OF-HOME CARE . . . AND THE CONDITIONS 

THAT LED TO THE CHILD’S OUT-OF-HOME PLACEMENT 

WERE CAUSED BY THE PARENT OR PARENTS,” 

UNCONSTITUTIONALLY REMOVE THE STATE’S BURDEN TO 

PROVE THAT THE PARENT’S OR PARENTS’ CONDUCT 

POSES A SUBSTANTIAL RISK OF HARM TO THE CHILD OR 

CHILDREN AFFECTED BY THE TERMINATION OF 

PARENTAL RIGHTS AND IS THE LEAST RESTRICTIVE 

MEANS OF PROTECTING THE CHILD OR CHILDREN FROM 

SERIOUS HARM?

CONNER, C.J., FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Ruths Hospitality Group, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended
March 28, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 7,
2010



By

/S/ MICHAEL P. ODONNELLMichael P. ODonnellPresident and Chief Executive Officer of
Ruths Hospitality Group, Inc.
**Exhibit23.1**

 

*Consent ofIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm*

 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement(Form S-8 No.118099) pertaining to the Stock Incentive Plan of KanbayInternational, Inc. and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 121400)pertaining to the 2005 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of our reports dated March14, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule ofKanbay International, Inc., Kanbay International, Inc. management’s assessmentof the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of KanbayInternational, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the yearended December 31, 2005.

 

 
| Chicago,  Illinois | /s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP |   |
|--------------------|----------------------------|--------|
|               |                       |   |
| March  14, 2006    |                       |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2009 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2009

 To prohibit the Secretary of the Treasury from enforcing the Patient 
 Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education 
                      Reconciliation Act of 2010.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 16, 2013

 Mr. Price of Georgia (for himself, Mr. Wilson of South Carolina, Mrs. 
 Blackburn, Mr. Culberson, Mr. Duncan of Tennessee, Mr. Westmoreland, 
   Mr. McClintock, Mr. Long, Mr. Roe of Tennessee, Mr. Cassidy, Mr. 
Sessions, Mr. Harris, Mr. Scalise, Mr. Pompeo, Mr. Jones, Mr. Huizenga 
  of Michigan, Mr. Collins of Georgia, Mr. Yoder, Mr. Pittenger, Mr. 
 Cramer, Mr. Lamborn, Mr. Joyce, Mr. Salmon, Mr. Hall, Mr. Chabot, Mr. 
Daines, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. Broun of Georgia, Mr. Perry, Mr. 
   Marchant, and Mr. Coble) introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the Secretary of the Treasury from enforcing the Patient 
 Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education 
                      Reconciliation Act of 2010.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Keep the IRS Off Your Health Care 
Act of 2013''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds the following:
            (1) On May 10, 2013, the Internal Revenue Service admitted 
        that it singled out advocacy groups, based on ideology, seeking 
        tax-exempt status.
            (2) This action raises pertinent questions about the 
        agency's ability to implement and oversee Public Law 111-148 
        and Public Law 111-152.
            (3) This action could be an indication of future Internal 
        Revenue Service abuses in relation to Public Law 111-148 and 
        Public Law 111-152 given that it is their responsibility to 
        enforce a key provision, the individual mandate.
            (4) Americans accept the principle that patients, families, 
        and doctors should be making medical decisions, not the Federal 
        Government.

SEC. 3. PROHIBITING ENFORCEMENT OF PPACA AND HCERA.

    The Secretary of the Treasury, or any delegate of the Secretary, 
shall not implement or enforce any provisions of or amendments made by 
Public Law 111-148 or 111-152.
                                 <all>
```