alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906**

 

Inconnection with the quarterly report of Orchids Paper Products Company (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Robert A. Snyder, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company,certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) andSection 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/  Robert A. Snyder                  |
|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | Robert  A. Snyder                      |
|   | Chief  Executive Officer and President |
|   | November 3,  2010                 |

 

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCTS

Case No. 3:19md2885

LIABILITY LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

Joseph Taylor, 7:20cv071

Judge M. Casey Rodgers

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Plaintiff Joseph Taylor is an initial bellwether plaintiff in this litigation. 

Accordingly, pursuant to Case Management Order No. 10, Mr. Taylor was required 

to provide signed authorizations for the release of certain records by April 27, 2020. 

See ECF No. 1086. Mr. Taylor failed to fulfill this requirement. On May 4, 2020, 

the Court granted Mr. Taylor until close of business on May 5, 2020 to provide the 

requisite authorizations and advised that his failure to do so would result in an order 

to show cause. Again, Mr. Taylor failed to comply with the Court’s directive. 

Additionally, the Court has been advised that Mr. Taylor has failed to respond to his 

counsel’s “extensive efforts” to communicate with him about his case. Mr. Taylor’s 

failure to comply with Court orders and his unresponsiveness to counsel are 

unacceptable and severely impede the litigation process; therefore, an order to show 

cause is necessary. Failure to comply with the order to show cause will result in 

sanctions, up to and including dismissal. See Equity Lifestyle Prop., Inc. v. Florida 

Case 7:20-cv-00071-MCR-GRJ Document 10 Filed 05/06/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

Case No. 7:20cv071/MCR/GRJ

Mowing & Landscape Serv., Inc., 556 F.3d 1232, 1240 (11th Cir. 2009) (“[A district] 

court may dismiss a claim if the plaintiff fails to prosecute it or comply with a court 

order.”); see also In re Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) Prod. Liab. Litig., 460 F.3d 

1217 (9th Cir. 2006) (affirming dismissals of individual cases with prejudice for 

failure to comply with case management orders).

Accordingly:

1. Plaintiff Joseph Taylor is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE

why his case should not be dismissed with prejudice for failure to 

prosecute and/or failure to comply with an order of the Court, by May 

13, 2020. Mr. Taylor’s response to this Order must be filed on the 

docket for his individual case only.

2. Failure to comply with this Order will result in sanctions, up to and 

including dismissal.

SO ORDERED, on this 6th day of May, 2020.

M. Casey Rodgers

M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 7:20-cv-00071-MCR-GRJ Document 10 Filed 05/06/20 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEETS, STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS, STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY AND
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-01-1995
<CASH>                                         1476652
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     5915
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     162685
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1753176
<PP&E>                                         2094841
<DEPRECIATION>                                  276536
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4582458
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           945440
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            35200
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     3601818
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   4582458
<SALES>                                       11052603
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              11090876
<CGS>                                          5952075
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  9447430
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 50550
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                6126
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1037731
<INCOME-TAX>                                     46000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             991731
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    991731
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .26
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 10.21

October 28, 2004

Mercantile Bank Corporation
Mercantile Bank of West Michigan
5650 Byron Center Avenue SW
Wyoming, Michigan 49509

     Re: Second Amendment to Employment Agreement dated October 18, 2001

Ladies and Gentlemen:

     This letter confirms our agreement reached today regarding the Employment
Agreement dated as of October 18, 2001, by and among you and me, as amended by
the letter agreement dated October 17, 2002 (as amended, the "Employment
Agreement"). We have agreed that all references in the Employment Agreement to
my titles as Senior Vice President and Secretary of Mercantile Bank Corporation
or as Senior Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Loan Review
Officer of Mercantile Bank of West Michigan, are amended respectively to refer
to Executive Vice President and Secretary of Mercantile Bank Corporation and
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Mercantile Bank of West
Michigan, to take into account the promotion I previously received that changed
my Vice President title from Senior Vice President to Executive Vice President,
and to omit the Chief Loan Review Officer title from the Employment Agreement.

     Except as specifically amended by this letter, all of the terms of the
Employment Agreement remain in full force and effect. This letter may be
executed in counterparts, and is governed by Michigan law.


                                        /s/ Robert B. Kaminski
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Robert B. Kaminski

MERCANTILE BANK CORPORATION


By: /s/ Gerald R. Johnson, Jr.
    ----------------------------------------
    Its: Chairman & Chief Executive Officer


MERCANTILE BANK OF WEST MICHIGAN


By: /s/ Gerald R. Johnson, Jr.
    ----------------------------------------
    Its: Chairman
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002*  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cascade Technologies Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Erik Lindsley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to his knowledge, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: April 29, 2011  /s/ Erik LindsleyName:Erik LindsleyTitle:Chief Financial Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cascade Technologies Corp.  and will be retained by Cascade Technologies Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.   *This certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

JOHNATHAN SAMUEL HARRIS,

Plaintiff,

vs. Case No.: 3:20cv2336/LAC/EMT

GREGORY WISE,

Defendant.

_______________________________/

ORDER

The chief magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation on

September 3, 2020 (ECF No. 15). The parties were furnished a copy of the Report

and Recommendation and afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to

Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). No objections have been filed.

Having considered the Report and Recommendation, I have determined it

should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The chief magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No.

15) is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Plaintiffs’ complaint (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED WITH

PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

Case 3:20-cv-02336-LC-EMT Document 16 Filed 10/02/20 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

3. The clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED this 2nd day of October, 2020.

 s/L.A. Collier 

LACEY A. COLLIER

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case No.: 3:20cv2336/LAC/EMT

Case 3:20-cv-02336-LC-EMT Document 16 Filed 10/02/20 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT (21)





SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT





Registrant owns 100% of the outstanding stock of each of the following corporations:



|                                             |  |                       
|-------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|Name                                         |  | State of Incorporation
|                                             |  |                       
|Harleysville Insurance Company of Ohio       |  | Ohio                  
|                                             |  |                       
|Harleysville-Atlantic Insurance Company      |  | Georgia               
|                                             |  |                       
|Harleysville Insurance Company of New Jersey |  | New Jersey            
|                                             |  |                       
|Harleysville Preferred Insurance Company     |  | Pennsylvania          
|                                             |  |                       
|Harleysville Lake States Insurance Company   |  | Michigan              
|                                             |  |                       
|Mid-America Insurance Company                |  | Pennsylvania          
|                                             |  |                       
|Harleysville Insurance Company               |  | Minnesota             
|                                             |  |                       
|Harleysville Insurance Company of New York   |  | New York              
|                                             |  |                       
|Harleysville Worcester Insurance Company     |  | Massachusetts         
|                                             |  |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM NL
INDUSTRIES INC.'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          74,579
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  157,691
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,711
<INVENTORY>                                    188,544
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               442,302
<PP&E>                                         894,865
<DEPRECIATION>                                 466,331
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,121,807
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          226,038
<BONDS>                                        738,774
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,355
<OTHER-SE>                                   (250,598)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,121,807
<SALES>                                        492,270
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               500,928
<CGS>                                          376,658
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  376,658
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              38,377
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (28,389)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,049
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (33,466)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (33,466)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.65)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.65)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MILTON DAVID PLUMMER, Appellant, vs. RENEE BAKER, L.C.C., Respondent. No. 85112



# FILED
AUG 1 9 2022 ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK Qc SUPREME COURT BY DEP iYCI

C"- (f ( ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion for relief from judgment or order pursuant to Nevada Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from such an order in a criminal matter, this court lacksjurisdiction to consider this appeal. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990) (explaining that court has jurisdiction only when statute or court rule provides for appeal). Accordingly, this court

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

Silver



### , Cadish Pickering

cc: Hon. Jim C. Shirley, District Judge Milton David Plummer Attorney General/Carson City Clerk of the Court/Court Administrator


### .-,25939 SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA

EOF 14147A
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1759 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1759

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
    Veterans Affairs to submit to Congress quarterly reports on the 
timeliness in which the Department of Veterans Affairs receives certain 
  information from other departments or agencies of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2013

Mr. Ruiz (for himself, Mr. Cardenas, Mrs. Kirkpatrick, Mr. Barber, Mrs. 
  Negrete McLeod, Mr. Takano, and Mr. Cook) introduced the following 
     bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of 
    Veterans Affairs to submit to Congress quarterly reports on the 
timeliness in which the Department of Veterans Affairs receives certain 
  information from other departments or agencies of the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. QUARTERLY REPORTS TO CONGRESS.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 77 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 7735. Quarterly reports to Congress
    ``(a) Reports.--Not later than 30 days after the end of each fiscal 
quarter, the Secretary shall submit to Congress a report on covered 
requests.
    ``(b) Matters Included.--Each report under subsection (a) shall 
include--
            ``(1) the number of covered requests made during the fiscal 
        quarter covered by the report; and
            ``(2) the average response time for such covered requests 
        made during each month of such fiscal quarter, as determined 
        based on the period beginning on the date on which the 
        Secretary made the request and ending on the date on which the 
        Secretary determines that the request is completed.
    ``(c) Covered Request Defined.--In this section, the term `covered 
request' means a request by the Secretary to the head of another 
department or agency of the United States for information required by 
the Secretary in adjudicating a claim for disability compensation under 
chapter 11 of this title.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
such chapter is amended by adding after the item relating to section 
7734 the following new item:

``7735. Quarterly reports to Congress.''.
                                 <all>
```
98-1513.

#### State v. Pack.

Pike App. No. 93CA525. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
Editorial Note on Part 1942
Editorial Notes: Nomenclature changes to part 1942 appear at 80 FR 9878, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1942.127 Project monitoring and fund delivery. ( a ) *Coordination of funding sources.* When a project is jointly financed, the District Director will reach any needed agreement or understanding with the representatives of the other source of funds on distribution of responsibilities for handling various aspects of the project. These responsibilities will include supervision of construction, inspections and determination of compliance with appropriate regulations concerning equal employment opportunities, wage rates, nondiscrimination in making services or benefits available, and environmental compliance. If any problems develop which cannot be resolved locally, complete information should be sent to the State Office for advice.
( b ) *Multiple advances.* Loans under this subpart are subject to the provisions of § 1942.17 (p)(2) of subpart A of this part 1942.
( c ) *Use and accountability of funds.* Loans under this subpart are subject to the provisions of § 1942.17 (p)(3) of subpart A of this part 1942.
( d ) *Development inspections.* Loans under this subpart are subject to the provisions of § 1942.17(p)(4) of subpart A of this part 1942.
( e ) *Payment for project costs.* Each payment for project costs must be approved by the borrower's governing body. ( 1 ) *Construction.* Payment for construction must be for amounts shown on payment estimate forms. Form RD 1924-18, “Partial Payment Estimate,” may be used for this purpose or other similar forms may be used with the prior approval of the District Director. However, the District Director cannot require more reporting burden than is required by Form RD 1924-18. Advances for contract retainage will not be made until such retainage is due and payable under the terms of the contract. The review and acceptance of project cost, including construction partial payment estimates, by RD does not attest to the correctness of the amounts, the quantities shown, or that the work has been performed under the terms of agreements or contracts.
( 2 ) *Major equipment.* Payment for major equipment should generally coincide with delivery of the usable equipment, along with any necessary title or certifications, to the borrower. Borrowers may not use Agency loan funds to make deposits on equipment not ready for delivery. If a borrower purchases a truck chassis from one supplier and another supplier will complete the development of a fire or rescue vehicle, RD may release funds to pay for the chassis when title to the chassis is transferred to the borrower.
( f ) *Use of remaining funds.* Loans under this subpart are subject to the provisions of § 1942.17 (p)(6) of subpart A of this part 1942.
[52 FR 43726, Nov. 16, 1987; 52 FR 47097, Dec. 11, 1987]
#### Wilma J. Rosario et al., Appellants, v New York City Transit Authority, Respondent.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered February 23, 1979, which was in favor of defendant and against them, upon a jury verdict. Judgment reversed, without costs or disbursements, and new trial granted. Reversal is required because the trial court’s charge to the jury on "emergency” failed to make it clear that the change in the color of the traffic signal facing the defendant’s *913bus driver could not be treated as creating an "emergency”. In addition, the court erred in its instruction that the bus driver’s deposition, his MV 104 form, and the information he gave defendant’s dispatcher could not be considered "legal proof of the facts stated in them.” Since the statements were admissions which contradicted the driver’s trial testimony, they could be considered as evidence in chief. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, O’Connor and Lazer, JJ., concur.
#### [The State ex rel.] Moyer, Appellee, *v.*Kroger Company, Appellant.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Moyer v. Kroger Co.*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 132.]

(No. 96-2351

Submitted July 8, 1998

Decided September 16, 1998.)

*133*Butkovich, Schimpf, Schimpf & Ginocchio Co., L.P.A., James A Whittaker*and *Stephen P. Gast,*for appellee.

*Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, Karl J. Sutter*and *Charles J. Kurtz III,*for appellant.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
#### WINN *&*LOVETT GROCERY COMPANY, and Winn & Lovett Tampa, Inc., Appellants, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Appellee.

No. 14638.

; United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

March 5, 1954.

Before STRUM and RIVES, Circuit Judges, and DAWKINS, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

On motion of the appellee this cause is remanded with directions to the District Court to vacate its judgment and dismiss the application as moot.

O. R. T. Bowden & Theo Hamilton, Jacksonville, Fla., for appellants.

John S. Patton, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Atlanta, Ga., A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L. R.B., Washington, D. C., for appellee.