alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 1962
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1962 appear at 80 FR 9902, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1962.8 Liens on real estate for additional security. The County Supervisor may take the best lien obtainable on any real estate owned by the borrower, including any real estate which already serves as security for another loan. Additional liens will be taken only when the borrower is delinquent, the existing security is not adequate to protect Rural Development interests, and the borrower has substantial equity in the real estate to be mortgaged, and taking such mortgage will not prevent making a Rural Development real estate loan, if needed, later. ( a ) - ( b ) [Reserved]
[50 FR 45783, Nov. 1, 1985, as amended at 53 FR 35783, Sept. 14, 1988; 56 FR 15824, Apr. 18, 1991; 61 FR 35930, July 9, 1996]
#### Emanuel Samaras et al., Respondents, v Gatx Leasing Corp. et al., Defendants, and Dynalectron Corporation, Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., defendant Dynalectron appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 22, 1979," as denied its motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ complaint. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. The details of the transaction sued upon are not clear. Apparently, the lease between Gatx Leasing Corporation and appellant was either assigned or sublet to Servair, Inc., appellant’s wholly-owned subsidiary and plaintiff Emanuel Samaras’ employer. On this record, we cannot, as a matter of law, dismiss plaintiffs’ claim based on strict liability in tort. It is clear that at least some leases will give rise to an action for strict products liability *(Nastasi v Hochman,*58 AD2d 564). Since the motion to dismiss was addressed to the complaint as a whole, it must be denied in its entirety upon a determination that one of the causes of action asserted by the complaint is legally sufficient *(De Maria v Josephs,*41 AD2d 655). We are also of the opinion that the plaintiffs’ suit is not barred by section 11 of the Workers’ Compensation Law. Although appellant is the sole stockholder of Servair, Inc., it is obviously a separate and independent corporation having some 31 other subsidiaries. Thus, it is not plaintiff Emanuel Samaras’ "employer” for the purposes of section 11 *(Boggs v Blue Diamond Coal Co.,*590 F2d 655, 662, cert den 444 US 836; accord, *Latham v Technar, Inc.,*390 F Supp 1031; *Thomas v Hycon, Inc.,*244 F Supp 151; cf. *Thomas v Maigo Corp.,*37 AD2d 754; *Daisernia v Co-Operative G. L. F. Holding Corp.,*26 AD2d 594; *Foley v New York City Omnibus Corp.,*112 NYS2d 217). Mangano, J. P., Cohalan, Martuscello and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**          I, John D. Morberg, certify that:          1. 1 have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Directed Electronics, Inc.;          2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;          3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;          4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and          5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.                                                       /s/ John D. Morberg   John D. Morberg  Date:  May 15, 2006 Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Morgan Creek Energy Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Marcus M. Johnson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: November 14, 2007



                                        By: /s/ MARCUS M. JOHNSON
                                            _____________________________
                                                Marcus M. Johnson
                                                President and Chief
                                                Executive Officer
§ 215.9 Effective date for reimbursement. ( a ) A State Agency, or FNSRO where applicable, may grant written approval to begin operations under the Program prior to the receipt of the application from the School Food Authority or child-care institution. Such written approval shall be attached to the subsequently filed application, and the agreement executed by the School Food Authority or child-care institution shall be effective from the date upon which the School Food Authority or child-care institution was authorized to begin operations: *Provided, however,* That such effective date shall not be earlier than the calendar month preceding the calendar month in which the agreement is executed by the State Agency or by the Department.
( b ) Reimbursement payments pursuant to § 215.8 shall be made for milk purchased and served to children at any time during the effective period of an agreement between a School Food Authority or child care institution and the State agency or the Department.
(Sec. 11, Pub. L. 95-166, 91 Stat. 1337 (42 U.S.C. 1772, 1753, 1766))
[32 FR 12587, Aug. 31, 1967, as amended by Amdt. 5, 37 FR 14686, July 22, 1972; Amdt. 13, 39 FR 28417, Aug. 7, 1974; Amdt. 16, 43 FR 1060, Jan. 6, 1978; 44 FR 10700, Feb. 23, 1979]
```

[109th Congress Public Law 206]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ206.109]

[[Page 120 STAT. 315]]

Public Law 109-206
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To designate the Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic in 
  Appleton, Wisconsin, as the ``John H. Bradley Department of Veterans 
  Affairs Outpatient Clinic''. <<NOTE: Mar. 23, 2006 -  [H.R. 1691]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

     The Department of Veterans Affairs outpatient clinic in Appleton, 
Wisconsin, shall after the date of the enactment of this Act be known 
and designated as the ``John H. Bradley Department of Veterans Affairs 
Outpatient Clinic''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in any law, regulation, map, document, record, or 
other paper of the United States to the facility referred to in section 
1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``John H. Bradley Department 
of Veterans Affairs Outpatient Clinic''.

    Approved March 23, 2006.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1691:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 151 (2005):
                                    Nov. 2, considered and passed House.
                                                        Vol. 152 (2006):
                                    Mar. 13, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```
To: Jim Eddinger/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

Date: 06/08/2012 05:02PM

Cc: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Thomas Gillis/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject: EO 13563 Interagency Comments on Area Source Boilers Rule

(See attached file: 

AreaSourceBoilers_InteragencyCommentsunderEO13563_2012_06_07.doc)

Hi Jim,

Attached are interagency comments under EO 3563 on the area source boilers rule. I will send a 

redline of the preamble on Monday.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks,

Cortney

AreaSourceBoilers_InteragencyCommentsunderEO13563_2012_06_07.doc
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Presidio Trust

# AGENCY:

The Presidio Trust.

# ACTION:

Notice of Public Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with § 103(c)(6) of the Presidio Trust Act, 16 U.S.C. 460bb appendix, and in accordance with the Presidio Trust's bylaws, notice is hereby given that a public meeting of the Presidio Trust Board of Directors will be held commencing 6:30 p.m. on Wednesday, December 8, 2010, at the Golden Gate Club, 135 Fisher Loop, Presidio of San Francisco, California. The Presidio Trust was created by Congress in 1996 to manage approximately eighty percent of the former U.S. Army base known as the Presidio, in San Francisco, California.

The purposes of this meeting are to approve minutes of a previous Board meeting, to provide the Executive Director's report, to provide the Chairperson's report, to provide the Finance and Audit Committee report, to approve a Revised Fiscal Year 2011 Budget Forecast and Five-Year Construction Plan, to provide project updates, and to receive public comment on other matters in accordance with the Trust's Public Outreach Policy.

                        Individuals requiring special accommodation at this meeting, such as                               ( print page 70756)                            needing a sign language interpreter, should contact Mollie Matull at 415.561.5300 prior to December 1, 2010.                    

*Time:*                         The meeting will begin at 6:30 p.m. on Wednesday, December 8, 2010.                    

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Golden Gate Club, 135 Fisher Loop, Presidio of San Francisco.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Karen Cook, General Counsel, the Presidio Trust, 34 Graham Street, P.O. Box 29052, San Francisco, California 94129-0052, Telephone: 415.561.5300.

Dated: November 12, 2010.

Karen A. Cook,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2010-29133 Filed 11-17-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-4R-P
EXHIBIT (32.2)





HARLEYSVILLE GROUP INC.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Harleysville Group Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Arthur E. Chandler, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on my knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







|                      |  |                                                  
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date:  March 10, 2006 |  | /s/ARTHURE. CHANDLER                             
|                      |  | Arthur E. Chandler                               
|                      |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 23-10856

____________

Julian Pratt Waterman Archer; Jane Gochenour 

Archer, 

Plaintiffs—Appellants,

versus

Stephen A. Kennedy; Kennedy Law, L.L.P.; Kennedy Law, 

P.C., 

Defendants—Appellees.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:21-CV-748

______________________________

Before Higginbotham, Stewart, and Southwick, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Appellants Jane and Julian Archer appeal the district court’s grant of 

summary judgment in favor of Appellees, finding that the Archers’ professional negligence claimed was precluded as a matter of law as they failed to 

provide sufficient evidence of damages. After reviewing the briefs and 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 3, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-10856 Document: 47-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/03/2024
No. 23-10856

2

relevant records, we AFFIRM for essentially the reasons of the able district 

court judge’s July 17, 2023 Memorandum Opinion and Order. 

Case: 23-10856 Document: 47-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/03/2024
Exhibit 10.8


 


Addendum
I to Services Agreement


 


This addendum (the “Addendum”),
dated as of March 14, 2013, is made by and between Alcobra Ltd., a company incorporated under the laws of the State of Israel
with its principal office at 35 Ehad Ha’am St., Tel Aviv, Israel (“Company”), and Dr. Dalia Megiddo, Israeli
ID 050694348 (“Consultant”) (each a “Party”, and together the “Parties”).


 


Capitalized terms not otherwise defined
herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Agreement (as defined below).


 


		Whereas	the Parties have entered into a certain Services Agreement (the “Agreement”),
dated June 2, 2011, pursuant to which Consultant provides Company with consulting Services related to pre-clinical, clinical, regulatory
and intellectual property issues; and



 


		Whereas	Company is currently contemplating an Initial Public Offering of the Company’s Ordinary Shares
on the NASDAQ Capital Market (an “IPO”), subsequent to which intensified efforts in performance of Services
shall be required of Consultant; and



 


		Whereas	the Parties wish to amend and modify the Agreement with respect to the compensation and benefits
to which Consultant shall be entitled to for performance of the Services subsequent to the IPO;



 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration
of the promises and mutual agreements herein set forth, the Parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, have agreed as follows:


 


		1.	Notwithstanding Section 1 of Annex A to the Agreement, subject to and effective upon consummation
of IPO, the “Monthly Fee” to be awarded to Consultant for performance of Services shall be NIS 20,000 plus VAT.



 


		2.	All other provisions of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect with the necessary
changes resulting from this Addendum.



 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties
have executed this Addendum as of the date first above written.


 


	/s/ Yaron Daniely	 	/s/ Dalia Megiddo
	Alcobra Ltd.	 	Dr. Dalia Megiddo
	 	 	 
	By: Yaron Daniely	 	 
	 	 	 
	Title: Chief Executive Officer
MEMORANDUM

TO: National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants Residual Risk and Technology

Review for Flexible Polyurethane Foam Production - Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-0510

FROM: J. Kaye Whitfield, USEPA

DATE: August 1, 2014

SUBJECT: Late Docket Entries

On July 29, 2014, EPA’s Administrator signed the final rule titled, “National Emission Standards 

for Hazardous Air Pollutants Residual Risk and Technology Review for Flexible Polyurethane Foam 

Production.” On that date, all materials comprising the administrative record for the NESHAP were 

complete and final. However, staff did not enter five documents and seven appendices into the 

rulemaking docket (EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0510) until July 30, 2014, the day following signature of the final 

rule. The items in question are listed below:

1) FPUF Prod Final Rule Amendatory Text REDLINE

2) FPUF Prod Final Rule Flex Foam Production Comment Summary Response

3) FPUF Production Final Rule ICR Supporting Statement

4) FPUF Production Final Rule Environmental Justice Review

5) FPUF Production Final Rule Risk Assessment
6) FPUF Production Final Rule Risk Assessment Appendices 1-7.

All of these items were complete at the time of signature and were not subsequently modified.

The late entry of these items in no way affected any of the decisions in promulgating the final 

rule.
### fap/ttt Sr+rw, AeTZ, 7Z ?S*/A /*V*' gf^gyi Ab©8 Acosta, Clerk , 

### 3T0?£#£l/h/7 # lJ/,,7Z &«J /?£cv< /^ //o? &>f /,6&fl Z^ ~T~a/<e/ #My?z ^6 /fajt d/r /j)/>//^s /L^y /^W~~ -?&* ©OUHTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS 20 2015
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.50

                                OFFICER BENEFITS

 AMERICA WEST HOLDINGS CORPORATION (AWHC) AND AMERICA WEST AIRLINES, INC. (AWA)

1. TRAVEL BENEFITS. Positive-space travel on America West Airlines and America
West Express is provided to officers of AWHC and AWA and their eligible
dependents, and cash payments are made to federal and state tax authorities on
behalf of each officer to cover tax liability on the value of travel benefits.

2. FINANCIAL ADVISORY AND TAX PREPARATION SERVICES. Financial advisory and tax
preparation services are provided to officers of AWHC and AWA. Vice Presidents
are eligible for reimbursement up to $3,500 annually and Senior Vice Presidents
and above are eligible for reimbursement up to $4,500 annually. Applicable
payroll taxes are withheld on the gross amount of reimbursement made to each
officer.

3. EXECUTIVE PHYSICALS. Payment of expenses associated with an annual physical
exam performed under the Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale Executive Health Program are
provided to officers.

4. RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS. Retiree Health Benefits (medical, prescription drug,
behavioral health, vision and dental) are available to officers age 55 and at
least five (5) years of service with AWHC or AWA. Eligible dependents may also
be covered as long as the retired officer is eligible for coverage and until the
first day of the month in which the officer turns age 65. AWHC pays 80% of the
cost of retiree health benefits for officers and their eligible dependents.

5. WELFARE BENEFITS. Officers hired or promoted before June 2002 are eligible
for Company paid, individual level term life insurance policies of $1,000,000
coverage for Vice Presidents, $1,500,000 for Senior Vice Presidents, $1,750,000
for Executive Vice Presidents and $2,000,000 coverage for
Chairman/CEO/President. Cash payments are made to federal and state tax
authorities on behalf of each eligible officer to cover tax liability on the
premiums paid for these policies.

Officers are provided self-insured, taxable, supplemental long-term disability
(LTD) coverage for their own occupation. This coverage provides a supplement to
the Company's group disability benefit program. The LTD supplement covers up to
80% of the officer's monthly pre-disability base salary to a maximum monthly
benefit of $15,000, offset by any benefit received under the group LTD Plan
(that has a benefit at 66-2/3% of pre-disability base salary to a maximum of
$6,667 per month) for up to two (2) years of LTD. Thereafter, the supplemental
LTD plan pays at 66-2/3% of pre-disability base salary to a maximum of $15,000
per month to age 65, offset by any benefit received under the group LTD plan.

6. AUTOMOBILE ALLOWANCE. A taxable automobile allowance up to 6% of monthly base
salary to a maximum of $800 per month is provided to officers.

7. DIRECTORS' AND OFFICERS' LIABILITY INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION. AWHC has a
policy that provides liability insurance for directors and officers of AWHC or
AWA.
#### § 1957.3 [Reserved]
Editorial Note on Part 1940
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1940 appear at 80 FR 9876, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1940.579 Multiple Family Housing appropriations not allocated by State. Funds are not allocated to States. The following program funds are kept in a National Office reserve and are available as determined administratively: ( a ) Section 514 Farm Labor Housing Loans.
( b ) Section 516 Farm Labor Housing Grants.
[64 FR 24480, May 6, 1999]