alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1783.8 What are the acceptable methods for submitting applications? ( a ) Applications for RFP grants may be submitted by U.S. Mail. Applications submitted by mail must be addressed as follows: Rural Utilities Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., STOP 1548, Washington, DC 20250-1548. The outside of the application should be marked: “Attention: Assistant Administrator, Water and Environmental Programs.” Applications submitted by mail must be postmarked not later than the filing deadline to be considered during the period for which the application was submitted.
( b ) In lieu of submitting an application by U.S. Mail, an applicant may file its application electronically by using the Federal Government's eGrants Web site (Grants.gov) at *http://www.grants.gov .* Applicants should refer to instructions found on the Grants.gov Web site for procedures for registering and using this facility. Applicants who have not previously registered on Grants.gov should allow a sufficient number of business days to complete the process necessary to be qualified to apply for Federal Government grants using electronic submissions. Electronic submissions must be filed not later than the filing deadline to be considered during the period for which the application was submitted.
( c ) The methods of submitting applications may be changed from time to time to reflect changes in addresses and electronic submission procedures Applicants should refer to the most recent FOA for notice of any such changes. In the event of any discrepancy, the information contained in the FOA must be followed. In the event of any discrepancy, the information contained in the notice must be followed.
[69 FR 59772, Oct. 6, 2004, as amended at 83 FR 45034, Sept. 5, 2018]
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2022-4157 

_____________________________

PETER JUSTIN WILL,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Jefferson County.

Dawn Caloca-Johnson, Judge.

June 10, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

OSTERHAUS, C.J., and RAY and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Lori A. Willner, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
§ 201.68 Eligibility requirements for certification of varieties. When a seed originator, developer, owner of the variety, or agent thereof requests eligibility for certification, the certification agency shall require the person to provide the following information upon request: ( a ) The name of the variety.
( b ) A statement concerning the variety's origin and the breeding or reproductive stabilization procedures used in its development.
( c ) A detailed description of the morphological, physiological, and other characteristics of the plants and seed that distinguish it from other varieties.
( d ) Evidence supporting the identity of the variety, such as comparative yield data, insect and disease resistance, or other factors supporting the identity of the variety.
( e ) A statement delineating the geographic area or areas of adaptation of the variety.
( f ) A statement on the plans and procedures for the maintenance of seed classes, including the number of generations through which the variety may be multiplied.
( g ) A description of the manner in which the variety is constituted when a particular cycle of reproduction or multiplication is specified.
( h ) Any additional restrictions on the variety, specified by the breeder, with respect to geographic area of seed production, age of stand or other factors affecting genetic purity.
( i ) A sample of seed representative of the variety as marketed.
[38 FR 25662, Sept. 14, 1973, as amended at 85 FR 40583, July 7, 2020]
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF lfEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C.
IN THE MATTER OF MOUNTAIN AIR CARGO, INC.

FAA DOCKET NO. 2014-0111 (Civil Penalty Action) CASE NO. 2013E680043 Hon
. 

### .1.E. Sullivan Administrative 

### Law Judge
JOINTSTIPULATION AND OROER 

# RECEIVED SEP

- 8 2014 HEARING DOCKET

Complainant, the Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA"). and Respondent. Mountain Air Cargo, Inc. (hereinafter '"Mountain Air Cargo'"), by and between counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to extend the deadline tiJr the FAA's Reply to Respondent's Supplemental Brieffrom September 4, 2014. to and including September 30.2014. The extension is agreed to allow the parties sutllcient time to discuss a full and tina! resolution ofthis Civil Penalty Action Case No. 2013E680043. Dated: September 

### 2. 20

### I 4 

### FEDERAL AVIATION ADivUNISTRATION By:

# ~J~**i'vi1#~M.** Berman Regional Counse.J's Onice 1Aviation Plaza 

### Jamaica. NY 11434 TEL: 718-553-3258 

## rAX: 718-995-5699 Mr. ivlark 

### .1\. Dombro!T tvls. Er.in E. Slusser 1676 Intemational Drive, 

### PH McLean. VA 22102 TEL: 703-336-8700 FAX: 703-336-8750

### SO-ORDERED Dated: -------'2014

Honorable J.E. Sullivan U.S. Administrative Law Judge

2

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on

## the;l"1 Day ofSeptember, 2014 the original plus one copywas sent via First Class U.S. Mail, postage pre-paidto the following: FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl000 and I hereby certifythat a copy ofthe foregoing Joint Stipulation and Orderwas sent via First Class U.S. Mail, postage pre-paid and by facsimile to: Judge J.E. Sullivan U.S. Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 FAX: 202-366-7536

3
#### Uneeba Home Appliances, Inc., Appellant, v. Long Island Rail Road Company, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

The letter from the attorney for appellant, dated February 7, 1967, is treated by this court as a motion for reargument of appellant’s motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals; and the letter from respondent’s counsel, dated February 15, 1967, in response has been considered as a paper in opposition to the motion. The motion for reargument is granted and, on reargument, the court adheres to its original decision on the ground that in this ease this court has no power to grant leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals because, in accordance with appellant’s stipulation upon its appeal to this court from the Appellate Term, judgment absolute Was directed to be entered against appellant upon this court’s affirmance on that appeal. The court takes this occasion to again call attention that it disapproves of the all too frequent practice of attorneys seeking reconsideration by means of letters addressed to the court or any of its Justices. Letter-writing should not be used as a substitute for the making of a formal motion upon appropriate papers, properly served and filed. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32





CASCADE TECHNOLOGIES CORP.





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cascade Technologies Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending February 28, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Erik Lindsley, as Principal Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: April 19,  2010
By:
/s/Erik LindsleyName:
Erik LindsleyTitle:
Principal Executive Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.)
#### § 1781.15 Planning and performing development.

Planning and performing development will be handled in accordance with subpart C of part 1780 of this chapter and guidance from NRCS.
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2038 

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to expand the eligibility 

of certain veterans while they have disability claims pending under title 

38 of the United States Code. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 16, 2013 

Ms. SPEIER (for herself, Mr. VARGAS, and Ms. MCCOLLUM) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to expand 

the eligibility of certain veterans while they have disability claims pending under title 38 of the United States 

Code. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Disabled Veterans Nu5 trition Fairness Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS. 

7 Section 3(j)(4) of the Food and Nutrition Act of 

8 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.) is amended— 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2038 IH

1 (1) in subparagraph (A) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the 

2 end, 

3 (2) in subparagraph (B) by adding ‘‘or’’ at the 

4 end, and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(C) has pending under title 38 of the 

7 United States Code a claim for compensation 

8 for a service-connected disability for which no 

9 disposition has yet been made by the Secretary 

10 of Veteran Affairs;’’. 

Æ 


jbell on DSK7SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -           Report: Spotlight on Juvenile Justice Initiatives: A State by State Survey      

# Report: Spotlight on Juvenile Justice Initiatives: A State by State Survey

This report (PDF, 53 pages), developed by the Federal Advisory Committee on Juvenile Justice, highlights the results of a state-level survey of juvenile justice initiatives from 34 states as reported by their State Advisory Groups. 

http://facjj.ojp.gov/ojpasset/Documents/Spotlight-on-JJ-Initiatives-FACJJ-2017.pdf?ed2f26df2d9c416fbddddd2330a778c6=hekdkkwdbk-hsydpsee&utm_source=Youth.gov&utm_medium=federal-links&utm_campaign=Resource
#### THOMPSON, Respondent, v. SUPREME TENT OF KNIGHTS OF MACCABEES OF THE WORLD, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

June 1, 1906.)

Action by Oscar D. Thompson against the Supreme Tent of the Knights of the Maccabees of the World.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide event upon questions of law only; the facts having been examined, and no error found therein. See Jumper v. Sovereign Oamp Woodmen of the World, 127 Fed. 635, 62 0. C. A. 361.

SPRING, J., not sitting.
Featured Grant OpportunitySchool Emergency Response to Violence (Project SERV) (Funding Opportunity) 

Featured Grant OpportunityShare with Youth: NOAA Student Opportunities Database

Featured Grant OpportunityShort Courses in Social Determinants of Health for Research Education in Nursing Research (Funding...

Featured Grant OpportunityComprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) Program (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityRisk and Protective Factors of Family Health and Family Level Interventions (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityPersonnel Development to Improve Services and Results for Children with Disabilities--Doctoral...

Featured Grant OpportunityStanding Announcement for Tribal Title IV-E Plan Development Grants (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityProviding Research Education Experiences to Enhance Inclusivity for a Diverse Substance Use and...

Featured Grant OpportunityFY 2024 Research on School-Based Hate Crimes (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityChallenge America (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityResearch and Evaluation on Firearm Violence and Mass Shootings (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityNational Juvenile Court Data Archive (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityGraduate Research Fellowship (Funding Opportunity)

Featured Grant OpportunityCommunity Programs for Outreach and Intervention with Youth and Young Adults at Clinical High Risk...

Featured Grant OpportunityPrint and Disseminate Child Victims and Witnesses Support Materials (Funding Opportunity)

## Breadcrumb

            -  Announcements 
            -           Resource: Department of Defense School Liaison Program      

# Resource: Department of Defense School Liaison Program

The School Liaison Program seeks to build a support network to provide the best possible education experience for military-connected children and youth. The program offers an array of services and resources to support students, parents, installation leadership, schools, and communities. They inform parents about local schools, graduation requirements, afterschool programs, homeschooling, and more. **Learn more.**
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

TALKING WALLS INC,

Plaintiff,

v. CASE NO.1:02CV41 MMP 

HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant.

___________________________/

O R D E R 

This matter is before the Court following a pretrial telephone status conference held by

this Court on Thursday, July 14, 2005. During that telephone conference, counsel for Plaintiff

and Defendant informed the Court that a settlement has been reached. Plaintiff's counsel also

informed the Court of the existence of a charging lien filed by Plaintiff's original attorneys. 

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

This case is DISMISSED. The Court will retain jurisdiction to ensure the effectuation of

settlement and the resolution of the charging lien.

DONE AND ORDERED this 14th day of July, 2005.

 s/Maurice M. Paul 

 Maurice M. Paul, Senior District Judge

Case 1:02-cv-00041-MP-AK Document 303 Filed 07/14/05 Page 1 of 1
§ 23.11 Board of Directors. ( a ) For each Regional Center there shall be a Board of Directors selected by the Regional Association of Agricultural Experiment Station Directors and the Regional Organization of Cooperative State Extension Directors. Membership on the Board of Directors shall include representatives from State Cooperative Extension Services and State Agricultural Experiment Stations from the States in the region and/or other State administrators of programs carried out under title V in the region.
( b ) The Director of each Regional Center will be responsible to the Board of Directors for the Regional Program conducted at that Regional Center. The Regional Annual Plan of Work will be developed by the Director and reviewed and approved by the Board of Directors.
#### §§ 1738.4-1738.50 [Reserved]
Piedmont Triad International Airport 243 A Burgess Road, Greensboro, NC 27409 Office (336) 668-7505, Fax (336) 668-7505 rwelsh@skylease.aero March 4, 201 3

DOT Docket Management System

400 7th Street, S.W., Room PL 401 Washington, DC 20591-0001

Reference: DOT Docket No. FAA-2006-26080

Dear Sirs:



### In accordance with §11.61 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR), Sky Lease 1 petitions the Administrator for an exemption from §121.434(c)(1)(ii) to t he extent necessary to substitute a qualified and authorized check airman in place of an FAA Inspector to observe a qualifying pilot in command (PIC) while that PIC is performing prescribed duties during at least one flight that includes a takeoff and a landing when completing initial or upgrade training as specified in §121.434.

The specific section 121. 434(c)(1)(ii) – OPERATING EXPERIENCE, OPERATING CYCLES,

ANDCONSOLIDATION OF KN OWLEDGE AND SKILLS reads in pertinent part:

“In addition, if a qualifying pilot in command is completing initial or upgrade training specified in FAR 121.424, be observed in the performance of prescribed duties by an FAA Inspector during at least one flight leg which includes a takeoff and a landing.”

Exemption No. 10231 was granted to Sky Lease I d/b/a Tr adeWinds Airlines on April 01, 2011. I respectfully request an extension of this Exemption to allow Sky Lease I, Inc. (WRNA 256M) to substitute a qualified and

authorized check airman in those circumstances w hen an FAA Inspector is unavailable to observe a qualifying pilot in command during any oper ating experience flights §121.434(c)(1)(ii).

- Sky Lease will nominate qualified check airmen to perfo rm this initial operating experience observation. The FAA will approve the qualified check airmen to c onduct the observation through a letter of authorization.

- The requirement of §121.434(c)(1)( ii) will be considered fulfilled if the FAA authorized check airman performs the observation. The observation requirement will be documented in the qualifying pilot’s record.

The authorized check airman would be a check airman ot her than the one who is conducting the operating experience flights of the qualifying pilot.

The FAA has the authority to observe any pilot any time at the discretion of the Administrator and continues to do so regularly. However, the FAA conducts t hese routine observations on a schedule defined by the local office without the requisite burden of specifying a pa rticular flight or flight series necessitated by the carrier’s training and service schedule. Relieving FAA Inspectors from §121.434(c)(1)(ii) will allow the FAA to focus the efforts on higher priority safety concerns.

Sincerely,

R. Todd Welsh Director of Operations Sky Lease I
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N
NO. 03-12-00798- CR Jacquelyn Marie Aguillon, Ap pellant

v. The State of Texas, App ellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F B ELL COUNTY , 264 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. 700 42, TH E H ONO RAB LE MARTH A J. TRUDO , JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Ap p el l ant J acque ly

n Marie Ag uillon has filed a document with this Court that we construe as a motion to dismiss this appea l. We g rant the motion and dismiss the appea l. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).

__________________________________________ J . Woodfin J ones, Chief Just ice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Rose and Goodw in Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion Filed: Aug ust 7, 2014 Do Not Publish
#### § 1786.36 Other prepayments.

Nothing contained in this subpart shall prohibit a borrower from making prepayments of FFB loans in accordance with the terms thereof.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCTS

Case No. 3:19md2885

LIABILITY LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

Baker, 7:20cv39

Judge M. Casey Rodgers

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones

REFERRAL AND ORDER

Referred to Judge M. Casey Rodgers on: July 9, 2021

Motion/Pleadings: Kimberly O. Branscome and Jay L. Bhimani’s Motion to Post Bond 

and Stay the Execution of Monetary Sanctions Pending Appeal

Filed by: Ms. Branscome and Mr. Bhimani on July 9, 2021 ECF # 191

Stipulated Joint Pldg.

Unopposed Consented

JESSICA J. LYUBLANOVITS

CLERK OF COURT

/s/ Kathy Rock

Deputy Clerk: Kathy Rock

On consideration, the motion is GRANTED, as requested. The supersedeas 

bond, ECF No. 191-1, is hereby approved, and execution of the monetary sanctions 

against Ms. Branscome and Mr. Bhimani set forth in the Court’s June 18, 2021 oral 

ruling and subsequent written Order on June 22, 2021 (ECF No. 187) is hereby 

stayed pending resolution of counsel’s appeal of the Order. 

DONE and ORDERED this 12th day of July, 2021. 

M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 7:20-cv-00039-MCR-GRJ Document 192 Filed 07/12/21 Page 1 of 1
#### § 1786.164 Loan fund audit.

In the event that a borrower shall prepay all its outstanding electric loans RUS shall have the right to audit within six (6) months of closing transactions involving the RUS Construction Fund Account established and maintained by the borrower pursuant to the terms of the RUS Loan Contract and to inspect all books, records, accounts, and other documents and papers of the borrower. Should RUS determine that the borrower has made disbursements of funds advanced pursuant to the RUS Loan Contracts which do not comply with the requirements thereof, the borrower shall be required to pay the RUS an amount equal to the difference between the amount which the borrower prepaid under this subpart with respect to such advances, and the amount which the borrower would otherwise have been required to return to the RUS as a result of noncompliance if the borrower had not prepaid such advances, plus interest. (See 7 CFR part 1721, Post-Loan Policies and Procedures for Insured Electric Loans.)