alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-775

_____________________________

RICKEY CARLTON BARKER, JR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Russell Healey, Judge.

August 22, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

WOLF, OSTERHAUS, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Danielle Jorden, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Samuel B. Steinberg,

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Editorial Note on Part 1944
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1944 appear at 80 FR 9885, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1944.667 Relocation and displacement. ( a ) *Relocation.* Public bodies and agencies must comply with the requirements of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Act of 1970. The grantee must provide assistance for permanent or temporary relocation of displaced persons for units repaired or rehabilitated or for individual homes replaced with HPG assistance. HPG funds may be used to cover costs incurred in the relocation of displaced persons. The applicant shall include in its statement of activities, a statement concerning the temporary relocation of homeowners and/or tenants during the period of repairs and/or rehabilitation to the units or dwellings. Any contract or agreement between the homeowner and the grantee, as well as between the grantee and the owner(s) of rental properties and co-ops shall include a statement covering at a minimum; ( 1 ) The period of relocation (if any);
( 2 ) The name(s) of the party (or parties) who shall bear the cost of temporarily relocating; and
( 3 ) The name(s) of the party (or parties) who shall bear the cost of permanent relocation; and
( 4 ) If paragraphs (a) (2) or (3) of this section is the grantee, the maximum amount of temporary or permanent relocation costs proposed to be allowed.
( b ) *Displacement.* The applicant shall include in its statement of activities, a statement as to how its proposed HPG financial assistance program shall keep to a minimum the displacement of homeowners and/or tenants.
[58 FR 21894, Apr. 26, 1993, as amended at 62 FR 26210, May 13, 1997]
#### § 205.664 [Reserved]
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS

*April 17, 2006*

[Cite as *04/17/2006 Case Announcements,*2006-Ohio-1854.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

1987-0327.

#### State v. Clark.

Lucas App. No. L-84-443. This cause came on for further consideration of appellant’s motion for stay of execution scheduled for May 2, 2006,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion is denied.
#### PEOPLE ex rel. LITCHFIELD et al., Appellants, v. WELLS et al., Tax Com’rs, Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

October 12, 1906.)

Proceedings by the people of the state of New York, on the relation of Edward H. Litchfield and others, against James L. Wells and others, as commissioners of taxes and assessments.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with §10 costs and disbursements, on the authority of People et al. v. O’Donnel et al., Tax Com’rs (Sup.) 99 N. Y. Supp. 436.
#### [The State ex rel.] Howard, Appellee, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio et al„ Appellants.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Howard v. Indus. Comm.*(1998), 88 Ohio St.3d 98.]

(No. 96-463

Submitted August 19, 1998

Decided September 9, 1998.)

*White, Getgey & Meyer Co., L.P.A.,*and *Barbara F. Florez,*for appellee.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Steven P. Fixler,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellants.

The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of *State ex rel. Tapp v. Parsec, Inc.*(1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 417, 696 N.E.2d 591, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
#### §§ 1900.157-1900.200 [Reserved]
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with thequarterly report on Form 10-Q of Advanced Life Sciences Holdings, Inc.(the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2008 (the“Report”), I, Michael T. Flavin, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 to the extent applicable; and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
|   | Date: May 7, 2008                     |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|   |                                       |
|   |                                       |
|   | /s/ Michael T. Flavin                      |
|   | Michael T. Flavin                          |
|   | Chief Executive Officer                    |
|   | Advanced Life Sciences Holdings, Inc. |

 

 

----
#### Board of Education of the City of New York, Respondent, v Aaron Cohen et al., Appellants.

In a proceeding to stay arbitration, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated January 22, 1979, that granted the petition and stayed arbitration. Judgmént affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Pursuant to the collective bargaining agreement between the parties, appellants served a demand for arbitration concerning the denial of salary and benefits "in violation of Article Seventeen D.” The petitioner moved to stay arbitration on the ground that the parties had not agreed to arbitrate such a dispute. Its position was that article 17D states that in the event of a layoff "applicable provisions of law will be followed to determine the staff member to be laid off” and that the agreement between the parties excluded from the definition of grievance "any matter as to which (1) a method of review is prescribed by law”. Here, the rights enuring to employees who were laid off was clearly a matter subject to judicial review. In any event, the language in the agreement is less than "express, direct and unequivocal” on whether the parties agreed to *arbitrate*this matter and arbitration was properly stayed (see *Matter of Acting Supt. of Schools of Liverpool Cent. School Dist. [United Liverpool Faculty Assn.],*42 NY2d 509, 510-511; accord *Matter of South Colonie School Dist. [South Coloide Teachers Assn.],*46 NY2d 521). Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, O’Connor and Lazer, JJ., concur.
## NO, BART 24-Hour Short Term Emission Rates at the Packaging Corporation of 

## America Valdosta, Georgia Mill

E:\Client 

### FilesWCA\Valdosta\BAR~ART 

### E

### SOz BART 24-Hour Short Term Emission Rates at the Packaging Corporation of America Valdosta, Georgia Mill &g a rallo ofUK heat inputs to di~bute he1 -gee 2% SUU ga dodthe heat inputs lodistribute &I wgc 2% Sull E:\ClientFilesWCA\VaIdosta\BAR~ARTEmissionRam 2 02 06 &SO2 BART
###### Editorial Note on Part 1944

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1944 appear at 80 FR 9885, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### § 1944.546 [Reserved]
§ 205.102 Use of the term, “organic.” Any agricultural product that is sold, labeled, or represented as “100 percent organic,” “organic,” or “made with organic (specified ingredients or food group(s))” must be: ( a ) Produced in accordance with the requirements specified in § 205.101 or §§ 205.202 through 205.207 or §§ 205.236 through 205.240 and all other applicable requirements of part 205; and
( b ) Handled in accordance with the requirements specified in § 205.101 or §§ 205.270 through 205.272 and all other applicable requirements of this part 205.
[65 FR 80637, Dec. 21, 2000, as amended at 75 FR 7193, Feb. 17, 2010]
§ 201.56-9 Mallow family, Malvaceae. Kinds of seed: Cotton, kenaf, and okra. ( a ) General description. ( 1 ) Germination habit: Epigeal dicot.
( 2 ) Food reserve: Cotyledons, which are convoluted in the seed; they expand and become thin, leaf-like, and photosynthetic.
( 3 ) Shoot system: The hypocotyl elongates carrying the cotyledons above the soil surface. The epicotyl usually does not show any development within the test period. Areas of yellowish pigmentation may develop on the hypocotyl in cotton.
( 4 ) Root system: A primary root, with secondary roots usually developing within the test period. Areas of yellowish pigmentation may develop on the root in cotton.
( b ) Abnormal seedling description. ( 1 ) Cotyledons: ( i ) Less than half of the original cotyledon tissue remaining attached.
( ii ) Less than half of the original cotyledon tissue free of necrosis or decay. (Remove any attached seed coats at the end of the test period for evaluation of cotyledons.)
( 2 ) Epicotyl: ( i ) Missing. (May be assumed to be present if both cotyledons are intact.)
( ii ) [Reserved]
( 3 ) Hypocotyl: ( i ) Deep open cracks or grainy lesions extending into the conducting tissue.
( ii ) Malformed, such as markedly shortened, curled, or thickened.
( 4 ) Root: ( i ) None.
( ii ) Weak, stubby, or missing primary root with weak secondary or adventitious roots.
( 5 ) Seedling: ( i ) One or more essential structures impaired as a result of decay from primary infection. (A cotton seedling with yellowish areas on the root or hypocotyl is classified as normal, provided the cotyledons are free of infection.)
( ii ) Albino.
[59 FR 64505 Dec. 14, 1994]
January 20, 1997

       Securities and Exchange Commission 
       450 Fifth Street, N.W. 
       Washington, D.C. 20549 

            Re:  Vitro Diagnostics, Inc. 
                    Form 10-KSB for the year ending October 31, 1996 
                    SEC file no.  0-17378 

       Dear Sir or Madam:

       Transmitted herewith through the EDGAR system is Form 10-KSB for 
he fiscal year ended October 31, 1996 for Vitro Diagnostics, Inc.  Should 
you have any questions or comments concerning this matter please contact 
the undersigned at the 303-794-2000.



       Sincerely, 



       Roger Hurst 
       President
§ 25.607 Suspension or termination of grant funds. ( a ) Grants under this subpart may be suspended or terminated by the funding official, in all or in part, in accordance with this subpart and the applicable provisions of 7 CFR parts 3015, 3016 and 3019, as applicable.
( b ) The funding official may elect to suspend or terminate the entirety of a grant, or funding of a particular benchmark activity, but nevertheless fund the remainder of a request for advance or reimbursement, where the funding official has determined: ( 1 ) That grantee or subrecipient of the grant funds has demonstrated insufficient progress toward achieving the related benchmark goal or in any other way failed to comply with the strategic plan;
( 2 ) There is reason to believe that other sources of joint funding have not been or will not be forthcoming on a timely basis;
( 3 ) The strategic plan calls for a revised use of the grant funds; or
( 4 ) Such other cause as the funding official identifies in writing to the grantee (including but not limited to the use of federal grant funds for ineligible purposes).
(April 17, 1967)

#### Citrus Bowl, Inc., Judgment Creditor, v. Colonial Farms, Inc., Appellant. American Can Company et al., Respondents; United States of America, Appellant.

Order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated

July 26, 1965, affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur; Hopkins, J., dissents and votes to modify the order, insofar as appealed from, by striking out its first decretal paragraph and by substituting therefor a paragraph providing for the following payments out of the Sum on deposit in the possession of the Director of Finance, less his commissions, as indicated on Certificate No. 1814, Account No. Q-l-5358: (1) $1,387.03, with interest, to the Sheriff of the City of New York, to be paid by the Sheriff to CherryBurrell Corporation, (2) $517.81, with interest, to the United States of America and (3) the sum remaining after the aforesaid payments to the Sheriff of the City of New York, to be paid by the Sheriff to American Can Company, with the following memorandum, in which Rabin, J. concurs: In my opinion, the United States of America is entitled to priority with respect to the tax assessment made against the judgment debtor on February 14, 1964 in the sum of $517.81, and recorded as a tax lien on April 16, 1964, over the judgment of American Can Company entered on May 25, 1964 *(United States*v. *Equitable Life,*384 U. S. 323, 327-328). The second tax assessment made on May 20, 1964 in the sum of $6,530.47, and recorded as a tax lien on May 28, 1964, was subordinate to the levy made some 87 minutes before under the judgment of American Can Company *(Matter of Kohlman*v. *Alexander,*1 A D 2d 334, affd. 4 N Y 2d 823). [47 Misc 2d 220.]
MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

98-795.

#### In re Edwards.

Cuyahoga App. No. 72473. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. It appears from the records of this court that appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due May 4, 1998, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed, *sua sponte.*
```

[109th Congress Public Law 196]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ196.109]

[[Page 120 STAT. 304]]

Public Law 109-196
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  770 Trumbull Drive in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, as the ``Clayton J. 
 Smith Memorial Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Mar. 20, 2006 -  [H.R. 
                                3825]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

     The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 770 
Trumbull Drive in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Clayton J. Smith Memorial Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Clayton J. Smith Memorial 
Post Office Building''.

    Approved March 20, 2006.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3825:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 151 (2005):
                                    Nov. 8, considered and passed House.
                                                        Vol. 152 (2006):
                                    Mar. 3, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Exhibit
23.1




CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








Board of
Directors


IR
BioSciences Holdings, Inc.


Scottsdale,
Arizona





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of IR
BioSciences Holdings, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-137191 and 333-113511) of
our report dated March 28, 2008 relating to our audit of the consolidated
financial statements which appear in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is
incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of IR BioSciences Holdings,
Inc. for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2007 and the
period October 22, 2002 (date of inception) through December 31,
2007.











/s/ RBSM
LLP


Certified Public
Accountants


New York,
New York


March 31,
2008
#### § 1782.8 Payments.

Payments will be applied in accordance with the terms of the debt instrument. Information on nontypical payments can be obtained from the Servicing official or office. All new borrowers will use pre-authorized debits as required in their Letter of Conditions.
#### In the Matter of James Hanlon, an Attorney, Respondent.

— Respondent’s resignation accepted and respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law in the State of New York effective July 26, 1976. Concur — Sandler, J. P., Bloom, Markewich, Lupiano and Silverman, JJ.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 18, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00004

- CV

RATTLESNAKE RIDGE VENTURES, LLC

,

Appellant

v.

Alicia ORTIZ , Individually and as Next Friend of M.D.M. and A.D.M.,

Appellee

From the 229th Judicial District Court

, Starr County, T exas

Trial Court No. DC

- 21

- 372

Honorable Baldemar Garza , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

S itting: Patricia O. Alvare z, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Jus tic e

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

The panel has considered Appell ee ’ s motion for rehearing; the motion is denied

. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 49.3.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 18th day of August, 2022

.

________________________________ M ichael A. C ruz

, Cler k of Court
# Official Journal C 181/13 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 181 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5713 June 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 181

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5713 June 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 181/01 | Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Directive 2009/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009 on the safety of toys (Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under Union harmonisation legislation)
   (1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2014/C 181/01

Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Directive 2009/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2009 on the safety of toys (Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under Union harmonisation legislation)
   (1)

(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under Union harmonisation legislation)

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
```

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1971 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1971

     To direct the Secretary of Defense to provide certain TRICARE 
 beneficiaries with the opportunity to retain access to TRICARE Prime.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 14, 2013

  Mr. Kline (for himself and Mr. Thornberry) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To direct the Secretary of Defense to provide certain TRICARE 
 beneficiaries with the opportunity to retain access to TRICARE Prime.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FUTURE AVAILABILITY OF TRICARE PRIME FOR CERTAIN 
              BENEFICIARIES ENROLLED IN TRICARE PRIME.

    Section 732 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2013 (Public Law 112-239; 126 Stat. 1816) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); and
            (2) by inserting the following new subsection:
    ``(b) Access to TRICARE Prime.--
            ``(1) One-time election.--Subject to paragraph (3), the 
        Secretary shall ensure that each affected eligible beneficiary 
        who is enrolled in TRICARE Prime as of September 30, 2013, may 
        make a one-time election to continue such enrollment in TRICARE 
        Prime, notwithstanding that a contract described in subsection 
        (a)(2)(A) does not allow for such enrollment based on the 
        location in which such beneficiary resides. The beneficiary may 
        continue such enrollment in TRICARE Prime so long as the 
        beneficiary resides in the same ZIP code as the ZIP Code in 
        which the beneficiary resided at the time of such election.
            ``(2) Enrollment in tricare standard.--If an affected 
        eligible beneficiary makes the one-time election under 
        paragraph (1), the beneficiary may thereafter elect to enroll 
        in TRICARE Standard at any time in accordance with a contract 
        described in subsection (a)(2)(A).
            ``(3) Residence at time of election.--An affected eligible 
        beneficiary may not make the one-time election under paragraph 
        (1) if, at the time of such election, the beneficiary does not 
        reside in a ZIP code that is in a region described in 
        subsection (c)(1)(B).''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 221 (Wednesday, November 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 70329]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28864]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-63072A; File No. SR-NYSEAmex-2010-97]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Immediate 
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by NYSE Amex LLC Amending the 
Exchange Price List; Correction

October 8, 2010.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Securities and Exchange Commission published a document in 
the Federal Register of October 19, 2010 concerning a Notice of Filing 
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by NYSE Amex LLC 
Amending the Exchange Price List. The document was dated incorrectly.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Yue Ding, Division of Trading and 
Markets, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20549, (202) 551-5842.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of October 19, 2010, in FR Doc. 2010-26109, 
on page 64368, in the 23rd line of the second column, the date is 
corrected to read as noted above.

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-28864 Filed 11-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
#### § 1735.93 Notes.

Substitute notes may be required in the case of an acquisition or merger, regardless of the source of funds.

[54 FR 14626, Apr. 12, 1989, unless otherwise noted. Redesignated at 55 FR 39395, Sept. 27, 1990.]
2006-0890.

#### State v. Carr.

Clermont App. No. CA2004-01-006, 2005-Ohio-417. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1980

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1980 appear at 80 FR 9905, Feb. 24, 2015.

#### §§ 1980.1016-1980.1019 [Reserved]