alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

113TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 1677 

To modify the boundary of Yosemite National Park, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 23, 2013 

Mr. COSTA (for himself, Mr. HONDA, Ms. LEE of California, Ms. CHU, Mr. 

SCHIFF, Mr. CA ́RDENAS, Mr. HUFFMAN, Mr. LOWENTHAL, and Mr. 

CARTWRIGHT) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To modify the boundary of Yosemite National Park, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Yosemite National 

5 Park Boundary Expansion Act of 2013’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PURPOSE. 

7 The purpose of this Act is to modify the boundary 

8 of Yosemite National Park to protect from potential devel9 opment the scenic and biological value of property adja10 cent to the Park. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 1677 IH

1 SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS. 

2 In this Act: 

3 (1) MAP.—The term ‘‘map’’ means the map en4 titled ‘‘Yosemite National Park Location Map for 

5 Boundary Line Adjustment (BLA) Areas’’. 

6 (2) PARK.—The term ‘‘Park’’ means the Yo7 semite National Park in the State of California. 

8 (3) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

9 the Secretary of the Interior. 

10 SEC. 4. YOSEMITE NATIONAL PARK. 

11 (a) ACQUISITION OF LAND.— 

12 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may acquire 

13 the land or an interest in the land described in sub14 sections (b) and (c) for addition to the Park. 

15 (2) MEANS.—An acquisition of land under 

16 paragraph (1) may be made by donation, purchase 

17 from a willing seller with donated or appropriated 

18 funds, or exchange. 

19 (b) DESCRIPTION OF LAND.—The land referred to in 

20 subsection (a)(1) is the approximately 1,575 acres of land 

21 adjacent to the Park, as generally depicted on the map. 

22 (c) AVAILABILITY OF MAP.—The map shall be on file 

23 and available for inspection in the appropriate offices of 

24 the National Park Service. 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 1677 IH

1 (d) BOUNDARY MODIFICATION.—The boundary of 

2 the Park shall be revised to reflect the acquisition of the 

3 land under subsection (a). 

4 (e) ADMINISTRATION.—The Secretary shall admin5 ister any land or interest in land acquired under sub6 section (a)(1) as part of the Park in accordance with the 

7 laws (including regulations) applicable to the Park. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK6TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 15




MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc.




Boise, Idaho









We have reviewed, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the unaudited interim financial information of MWI Veterinary Supply, Inc. and subsidiaries for the periods ended March 31, 2011, and 2010, as indicated in our report dated May 5, 2011; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.




We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, is incorporated by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-127879, 333-127880, and 333-149275 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-141078 on Form S-3.




We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.









/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLPBoise, Idaho


May 5, 2011
#### § 1902.5 [Reserved]
#### In the Matter of Yolanda McCombs, Appellant, v Alice Sachs et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents, and Dennis Coleman, Respondent. In the Matter of Dennis Coleman, Respondent, v Yolanda McCombs, Appellant, and Frank X. Gargiulo et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents.

Judgments, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered on April 3, 1980 and April 4, 1980, respectively, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. No opinion. Concur—Ross, J. P., Markewich, Lupiano, Bloom and Carro, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 1955
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1955 appear at 80 FR 9895, Feb. 24, 2015.

§ 1955.123 Sale procedures (chattel). ( a ) *Credit sales.* Although cash sales are preferred in the sale of chattel, credit sales may be used advantageously in the sale of chattels to eligible purchasers and to facilitate sales of high-priced chattels. Credit sales to eligible purchasers will be in accordance with the provisions of this chapter for the appropriate program for which a loan would otherwise be made including eligibility determinations. Preference will be given to a cash offer that is at least * percent of the higher offer requiring credit. [*Refer to exhibit B of RD Instruction 440.1 (available in any Rural Development office) for the current percentage.] Credit sales made to ineligible purchasers will require not less than a 10 percent downpayment with the remaining balance amortized over a period not to exceed 5 years. The interest rate for ineligible purchasers of C&BP chattel will be the current ineligible interest rate for C&BP property set forth in Exhibit B of RD Instruction 440.1 (available in any Rural Development office). District Directors and State Directors are authorized to approve or disapprove sale of C&BP chattel on ineligible terms in accordance with the respective type of program approval authorities in Exhibit E of Subpart A of Part 1901 of this chapter (available in any Rural Development office). For other than C&BP, credit sales to NP purchasers will be handled in accordance with Subpart J of Part 1951 of this chapter.
( b ) *Receipt of payment.* Payment will be by cashier's check, certified check, postal or bank money order or personal check (not in excess of $500) made payable to the agency. Cash may be accepted if it is not possible for one of these forms of payment to be used. Third party checks are not acceptable. If full payment is not received at the time of sale, the offer will be documented by Form RD 1955-45 or Form RD 1955-46 where the chattel is sold jointly with real estate by regular sale.
( c ) *Transfer of title.* Title will be transferred to a purchaser in accordance with § 1955.141(b) of this subpart.
( d ) *Reporting sale.* Sales will be reported in accordance with § 1955.142 of this subpart.
( e ) *Reporting and disposal of inventory property not sold.* Refer to §§ 1955.143 and 1955.144 of this subpart for additional guidance in disposing of problem property.
[50 FR 23904, June 7, 1985, as amended at 58 FR 52653, Oct. 12, 1993; 58 FR 58650, Nov. 3, 1993; 68 FR 61332, Oct. 28, 2003; 80 FR 9899, Feb. 24, 2015]
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of Candela Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for theperiod ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert E. Quinn, Principal FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1)         The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and 

(2)         Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 
| /s/ ROBERT  E. QUINN          |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
| Robert E. Quinn               |   |
| *Principal Financial Officer* |   |
| September 12, 2007            |   |

 

----
Erratum to the BVM

ANOPR document ( 73

DOE has provided a replacement.

table for Table 111.2 in the BVM

ANOPR document ( 73 FR page

34135). (PDF 12 KB)

Download Adobe Reader.

. Table 111,2 Candidate Standard Levels for Analyzed Equipment Classes Expressed in

Terms of the Refrigerated Volume

Candidate Standard Level in Order of Efficiency Expressed in Terms of

Equipment Test Metric the Test Metric

Class Baseline CSL1 CSL2 CSL3 CSL4 CSL 5

Daily Energy B = 0.0550 B = 0.0508 B = 0.0494 B = 0.0451 B = 0.0397 B = 0.0386

Class A Consumption K = 4.74 K = 3.78 K = 3.39 K = 3.29 K = 3.12 K = 2.97

kWh/day (Level 1) (Level 3) (Level 4) Levels (Level 7) (Level 8)

Daily Energy B = 0.0771 B = 0.0680 B = 0.0554 B = 0.0833 B = 0.0479 B = 0.0471

Class B Consumption K = 4.08 K = 2.94 K = 2.90 K = 2.00 K = 2.37 K = 2.33

kWh/day (Level 1) Level 3) (Level 4 (Level 5) (Level 7) (Level 8

EERE-2006-STD-0125 COMMENT 25
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brian J.G. Pereira, Chief Executive Officer and President of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:



/s/ BRIAN J.G. PEREIRA Brian J.G. Pereira Chief Executive Officer and President
(principal executive officer)Dated: February 26, 2010


---



QuickLinks
URI-3.31.2013-Ex 10.B






Exhibit 10(b)
SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


This Second Amendment to the Employment Agreement between UNITED RENTALS, INC. (the “Company”) and DALE ASPLUND (“Employee”) is hereby entered into as of the date signed by the parties below.  
RECITALS:


WHEREAS, the parties entered into an Amended Employment Agreement, dated April 28, 2008 (the “Employment Agreement”);


WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Employment Agreement to modify the provisions identified below;


AND WHEREAS, all other provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain unchanged;


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are acknowledged, the parties mutually agree that:


1.    The 12 month period described in Section 3(a) and Section 3(b) of the Agreement shall be amended to “24 months.”


2.    In the event Employee ever intends to resign his employment with the Company, Employee shall notify the Company of his intent to resign one year prior to such resignation, and Employee shall continue to fully perform and transition his duties throughout the one year notice period and will be entitled to compensation during such period on such terms as may be agreed-upon between the Company and Employee.


3.    In the event Employee receives the payments described in Section 3.1(a) of the Agreement, then, for a period of 12 months following termination of employment, the Company shall provide Company-paid medical and dental coverage under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (“COBRA”), provided that Employee is then actively enrolled in such medical and dental coverage and provided Employee makes a timely COBRA election to continue such medical and dental coverage.


The terms and conditions of all other sections of the Employment Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect, and Employee hereby reaffirms those provisions.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment to be effective as of the date identified below.  


UNITED RENTALS, INC.                    EMPLOYEE




BY:  /s/Michael J. Kneeland                    /s/Dale Asplund
                                
NAME: Michael J. Kneeland                    Dale Asplund


TITLE: President and Chief Executive Officer              


DATE: April 3, 2013                        April 2, 2013
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Notes:

1. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 83 FR 22178, May 14, 2018.

2. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 83 FR 61310, Nov. 29, 2018

3. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 85 FR 65504, Oct. 15, 2020.

4. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 87 FR 44266, July 26, 2022.

#### § 2.10 Limitations.

The delegations made in this part shall not be construed to confer upon any general officer or agency head the authority of the Secretary to prescribe regulations which by law require approval of the President.
Exhibit 10.1(aq)


 


AMENDMENT NUMBER ELEVEN

TO THE

SAUER-DANFOSS EMPLOYEES’ SAVINGS PLAN

(As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 1997)


 


By
virtue and in exercise of the amending power reserved to Sauer-Danfoss (US)
Company (the “Company”) by Section 14.1 of the Sauer-Danfoss Employees’ Savings
Plan as amended and restated effective January 1, 1997 (the “Plan”) and
pursuant to the authority delegated to the undersigned officer of the Company
by the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”), the Plan is hereby
amended, effective as of January 1, 2004, as follows:


1.               The Plan is amended by deleting paragraph (b) of Section 5.2, in
its entirety, and substituting the following new paragraph (b) as a part
thereof:


“(b)                           Maximum Reduction.  The maximum reduction
for any Participant for any payroll period shall be one hundred percent (100%)
of such Participant’s Compensation for such payroll period; notwithstanding the
foregoing and notwithstanding any Participant Contribution elected by a
Participant under this Section 5.2, if a Participant has elected to defer a
percentage of his or her Compensation such that contribution of the gross
amount of the Compensation would leave insufficient funds to satisfy all
required deductions against such Compensation (including, but not limited to,
any pre-tax elective contributions or benefit contributions made by such
Participant, wage assignments, wage garnishments, child support payments,
levies, remittance of all applicable taxes to governmental authorities
(collectively the “Deductions”)), then the applicable Participant Contribution
amount shall be made net of the smallest amount of Deductions needed to satisfy
all such payments which cannot be covered from the portion of Compensation not
deferred.”


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company
has authorized the execution on its behalf of this Amendment Number Eleven this
31st day of December, 2004.


 


 


	
   

  	
  Sauer-Danfoss
  (U.S.) Company

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/
  JAMES T. REMUS

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  James T. Remus

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Director — Global
  Compensation and Benefits
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA 

PENSACOLA DIVISION 

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCTS

 Case No. 3:19md2885 

LIABILITY LITIGATION 

This Document Relates to: 

Wilkerson, 7:20cv35 

 

Judge M. Casey Rodgers 

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones 

EXHIBITS ORDER NO. 1 

This Order addresses Defendants’ objections to exhibits identified on 

Plaintiff’s first priority exhibit list dated February 13, 2022. The Court’s rulings are 

set forth and highlighted in the attached Exhibit A. Rulings for all remaining 

objections on parties’ priority exhibit lists will follow by separate order. 

SO ORDERED this 2nd day of March, 2022. 

 

 M. CASEY RODGERS 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 7:20-cv-00035-MCR-GRJ Document 120 Filed 03/02/22 Page 1 of 1
CQ!569!)Tgx/!1701;*!!Crrgctcpeg!qh!Eqwpugn

WPKVGF!UVCVGU!FKUVTKEV!EQWTV

hqt!vjg

aaaaaaaaaa!Fkuvtkev!qh!aaaaaaaaaa

*

*

*

*

*

Plaintiff

x/ Ecug!Pq/

Defendant

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

Vq<! Vjg!engtm!qh!eqwtv!cpf!cnn!rctvkgu!qh!tgeqtf

K!co!cfokvvgf!qt!qvjgtykug!cwvjqtk|gf!vq!rtcevkeg!kp!vjku!eqwtv-!cpf!K!crrgct!kp!vjku!ecug!cu!eqwpugn!hqt<

/

Fcvg<

Attorney’s signature

Printed name and bar number

Address

E-mail address

Telephone number

FAX number

Pqtvjgtp Fkuvtkev qh Hnqtkfc

Nathaniel F. Hieb

3M Company and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES, LLC

3:19-cv-01501

Nathaniel F. Hieb

05/17/2019 /s/ Jonathan D. Orent

Jonathan Orent - RI 7408

Motley Rice LLC

55 Cedar Street, Suite 100

Providence, RI 02903

jorent@motleyrice.com

(401) 457-7700

(401) 457-7708

Case 3:19-md-02885-MCR-HTC Document 364 Filed 05/20/19 Page 1 of 1
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Cascade Technologies Corp. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Rick
Walchuk, President and Principal Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
      January 2, 2009
                By:
                /s/ Rick
      WalchukName:
      Rick WalchukTitle:
      President (Principal Executive Officer)
Appeal No. 79-256.

#### Friendly Liquors, Inc. *v.*Eugene J. Pontbriant *et al.*

The defendant, Eugene J. Pontbriant, appeared in response to a Show Cause Order issued by this *912court on November 29, 1979, to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed since review of a Superior Court judgment in a zoning case can only be obtained by a petition for a writ of certiorari.

Mr. Justice Doris not participating.

*Richard R. Ackerman, Inc.*for plaintiff, *Macktaz, Keefer and Kirby, Joseph P. Carroll*(for Eugene J. Pontbriant), *Gerald M. Rrenner,*Assistant City Solicitor (for Zoning Board of Review of the City of Woonsocket), for defendants.

There having been no cause shown, the appeal is hereby dismissed and the papers remanded to the Superior Court.
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Notes: 1. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 83 FR 22178, May 14, 2018. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 83 FR 61310, Nov. 29, 2018 3. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 85 FR 65504, Oct. 15, 2020. 4. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 87 FR 44266, July 26, 2022.

§ 2.6 Designation of first assistants. ( a ) Every office within the Department to which appointment is required to be made by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate (“PAS Office”) may have a First Assistant within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. 3345-3349d. ( 1 ) Where there is a position of principal deputy to the PAS Office, the principal deputy shall be the First Assistant.
( 2 ) Where there is only one deputy position to the PAS Office, the official in that position shall be the First Assistant.
( 3 ) Where there is more than one deputy position to the PAS Office, and this part establishes which deputy is delegated the authority to perform all the duties and exercise all the powers of the PAS Office during the absence or unavailability of the PAS official, the deputy delegated such authority shall be the First Assistant.
( 4 ) Where neither paragraph (a)(1), (2), nor (3) of this section is applicable to the PAS Office, except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, the Secretary may designate in writing the First Assistant position.
( b ) The Inspector General of the Department shall determine any arrangements for the temporary performance of the functions and duties of the Inspector General when that office is vacant.
[81 FR 45963, July 15, 2016]
EXHIBIT 16.1 LETTER ON CHANGE IN CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT

Cordovano and Harvey, P.C. Certified Public Accountants
-------------------------------------------------------
201 Steele Street Suite 300 Denver, Colorado 80206
(303) 329-0220 Phone
(303) 316-7493 Fax

             ------------------------------------------------------


JUNE 12, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, D.C. 20549

Re:  Sequiam Corporation (formerly Wedge Net Experts, Inc.)

Ladies and Gentlemen:

We  were  previously  the principal accountants for Wedge Net Experts, Inc., the
predecessor  of Sequiam Corporation, and we reported on the financial statements
of  Wedge  Net  Experts,  Inc.  as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, for the fiscal
years  ended  December  31,  2001 and 2000 and for the period from September 21,
1999  (date  of  inception)  through  December  31,  2001.  On June 6, 2002, our
appointment  as  principal  accountants  was  terminated.  We  have read Sequiam
Corporation's  statements  included under Item 4 of its Form 8-KA dated December
10,  2001,  and  we  agree  with  such  statements,  except that we are not in a
position  to  agree  or  disagree  with  the  statements  included in Item 4(b).
Yours  truly,

                         /s/ Cordovano and Harvey, P.C.
                         ------------------------------
                         Cordovano and Harvey, P.C.


                                                            Exhibit 16.1- Page 1
<PAGE>
§ 1767.11 Purpose. ( a ) The standard form of RUS loan documents for electric borrowers requires that the borrower keep books, records, and accounts in which full and true entries will be made of all of the dealings, business and affairs of the borrower in accordance with the methods and principles of accounting of this part.
( b ) This subpart implements these provisions of the RUS loan documents by prescribing the RUS USoA for electric borrowers and by providing accounting methodologies and procedures which are applicable to particular situations.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCTS

Case No. 3:19md2885

LIABILITY LITIGATION

This Document Relates to:

Baker, 7:20cv39

Judge M. Casey Rodgers

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones

DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS ORDER NO. 4

This Order addresses Defendants’ objections and counter-designations to 

Plaintiff’s affirmative deposition designations and Plaintiff’s objections to 

Defendants’ counter-designations thereto for the following witness depositions:

1. Merkley, John 2-26-2020

2. Ohlin, Doug 4-24-2013 (Moldex)

SO ORDERED, on this 4th day of June, 2021.

M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 7:20-cv-00039-MCR-GRJ Document 149 Filed 06/04/21 Page 1 of 1