alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Wilson’s Heirs *vs.*Ryan.

Pebt. Case US.

Appeal irom the Ivia on Cncuit; Ropes. Judge.

*Right of holder of a note to strike out intermediate endorsements and sue in the name oj payee.*

Bank to wnom a note las lieen regularly puss-*d endorsement though the zanie have been (In-counted and thereby placed on the footing of a bill of exchange, cannot sinke out the interimdíate endorsemonis and sue in the name of payee. The plaintiff must have the legal title to the no'e to maintain the action.

May 9.

Judge Nicholas

delivered the opinion of tl e court.

This is an action brought in the name of James Ryan, for the use of the Limestone Bank, against the heirs of John A. Wilson, upon a note executed by him to James Ryan, who endorsed it in blank to Moses Ryan, who endorsed it ip blank to the Bank of Limestone, who discounted it for the benefit of Wilson. There was no re-assignment of the note to James Ryan, the plaintiff, or payment of it by him, but the note was sued on in his name for the benefit of the Bank, under a supposition that the charter of the Bank had expired, and it no longer had authority to sue in its own name.

Upon an agreed case presenting these facts, the court rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

It is now insisted that the judgment was right, because the discounting of the note having placed the note on the footing of a bill of exchange, *the*bank, as the holder, had a right to strike out the intermediate endorsement and sue for its own benefit, in the name of the payee. We think otherwise. The plaintiff, whether nominal or real, must always be vested with the legal right of action. The property in the note had passed by the endorsements to the bank, and could not revert to Ryan so as to clothe him with the right of action on it, unless lie had paid it or obtained a re-assignment. If' lie had paid tile note, he no doubt would, as the the holuer and proprietor, have had a right to strike out any endorsement subsequent to his own, and bring suit in his ovvu name. But the bank, whilst still holding and owning the note, could not, by striking out the intermediate endorsement, reinvest him with the legal title to the note so as to enable it to sue in his name, even lor the bank’s benefit. Ttie only effect of such an operation would be to break one link of the chain of title, by which the note was transferred to the bank, and render James Ryan the immediate instead of the remote assignor *351to tbe bank. It reconveved no property in the note to him. See Hardin, 562.

Reid, for appellants; *Brown*and *More head,*for appellee.

We have not thought it necessary to investigate the question whether the bank still retains the power of suing, for let that be as it may, it would not affect the right of suing in the name of Ryan.

Wherefore, the judgment is reversed and cause remanded, with directions to enter judgment upon the facts agreed in favor of the appellants, who must recover costs here.
# ORIGINAL IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA PR 22-0005 IN RE THE MOTION OF MALLORY

P. SANZERI FOR ADMISSION TO THE BAR OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

f



### MAY 

## 3 1 2022 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Suprerne Court Stete of Montana ORDER Mallory P. Sanzeri has filed
a motion for admission
to the Bar of the State of Montana pursuant
to Rule V of the Rules for Admission, Admission
on Motion. The Bar Admissions Administrator

of the State Bar of Montana has informed the Court that the Commission
on Character and Fitness has certified that Sanzeri has provided the necessary docurnentation and has satisfied the requirements prerequisite

to admission on motion under Rule V. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon payment of any application fees and completion
of any other processing requirements

as set forth by the Bar Admissions Administrator, Mallory P. Sanzeri may be sworn in to the practice of law in the State of Montana. Arrangements
for swearing
in may be made by contacting the office of the Clerk of the Montana Suprerne Court. The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to Petitioner and to the State Bar of Montana. DATED this--

1

1 day of May, 2022. Chief Justice05/31/2022Case Number: PR 22-0005e9/otalft...Justices2
§ 25.503 Rural areas. ( a ) *What constitutes “rural”.* A rural area may consist of any area that lies outside the boundaries of a Metropolitan Area, as designated by the Office of Management and Budget, or, is an area that has a population density less than or equal to 1,000 persons per square mile, the land use of which is primarily agricultural.
( b ) *Exceptions to the definition.* On a case by case basis, the Secretary may grant requests for waiver from the definition of “rural” stated in paragraph (a) of this section upon a showing of good cause. Applicants seeking to apply for a rural designation who do not satisfy the definition in paragraph (a) of this section must submit a request for waiver in writing to the Deputy Administrator, USDA Office of Community Development, Reporters Building, Room 701, STOP 3203, 300 7th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20024-3202. Requests must include: ( 1 ) The name, address and daytime phone number of the contact person for the applicant seeking the waiver; and
( 2 ) Sufficient information regarding the area that would support the infrequent exception from the definition.
( c ) *Waiver process.* The Secretary, in consultation with the Department of Commerce, will have discretion to permit rural applications for communities that do not meet the above rural criteria.
Susan E. Alderton
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                                             (281) 423-3332


                                                               EXHIBIT 99.1







FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE



            NL INDUSTRIES, INC. ANNOUNCES THIRD QUARTER DIVIDEND



HOUSTON, TEXAS -- July 20, 1999 -- NL Industries,  Inc. (NYSE:NL) announced that
its Board of Directors has declared a regular quarterly  dividend of three and a
half  cents  per  share on its  common  stock,  payable  September  30,  1999 to
shareholders of record September 16, 1999.

NL  Industries,  Inc. is a major  international  producer  of  titanium  dioxide
pigments.


                                  # # # # #
#### Empire Pile Driving Corp. et al., Respondents, v. Hylan Sanitary Service, Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Respondent.

a proceeding to discharge two notices of mechanics’ liens, filed respectively by Hylan Sanitary Service, Inc., and General Heating and Air Conditioning Corp., said lienors appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated November 26, 1968 and made on reargument, as adhered to the original decision granting the petition and denying their cross motion to dismiss the petition. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $10 costs and disbursements to petitioners-respondents. In our opinion, the two notices of lien in question were fatally defective in failing to comply with the provisions of section 9 of the Lien Law. Appellant Hylan Sanitary Service, Inc.’s notice failed to state clearly: (1) “The labor performed or materials furnished”, as required by subdivision 4 of the section *(San Marco Constr. Corp.*v. *Gillert,*15 Misc 2d 208, 210; *Fanning*v. *Belle Terre,*152 App. Div. 718; *Toop*v. *Smith,*181 N. Y. 283, 287-288); (2) “The amount unpaid to the lienor for such labor or materials ”, as required by subdivision 5 thereof *(Riley*v. *Durfey,*145 App. Div. 583, 586); and (3) the *exact*“time when the first and last items of work were performed and materials were furnished”, as required by subdivision 6 thereof (cf. *Fenichel*v. *Zicherman,*154 App. Div. 471). In addition, the notice was not verified, in violation of subdivision 7 of the section (cf. *Mozarsky*v. *Whinston Bros.,*254 N. Y. 552; *Kingston*v. *M. S. Constr. Corp.,*249 N. Y. 533, and *Fries*v. *Bray,*279 App. Div. 8, with *Matter of Teitler*v. *McDermott & McDonald,*282 App. Div. 953, affd. 306 N. Y. 953). While it might be the case that any of the defects standing alone could be amended under section 12-a of the Lien Law (cf. *Matter of Teitler*v. *McDermott & McDonald, supra),*at bar there is not one but several defects and we are not able to say that under these circumstances there has been substantial compliance with the Lien Law (cf. § 23 thereof). With respect to the notice of appellant General Heating and Air Conditioning Corp., we have twice before held on analogous facts that a notice of lien is fatally defective if “ it purports to include material furnished under several transactions for the improvement of distinct and widely separated pieces of real property, being improved as independent operations ” *(Matter of Twin County Tr. Mix*v. *Ingula Bldrs. Corp.,*27 A D 2d 939; *Buhler Co.*v. *New York Dock Co.,*170 App. Div. 486). Accordingly Special Term was acting *564within its discretion in summarily discharging the notices of lien (see Lien Law, § 19, subd. 6). Rabin, Acting P. J., Benjamin, Munder, Martuscello and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur. »
Editorial Note on Part 246
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 246 appear at 76 FR 35097, June 16, 2011.

§ 246.13 Financial management system. ( a ) *Disclosure of expenditures.* The State agency shall maintain a financial management system which provides accurate, current and complete disclosure of the financial status of the Program. This shall include an accounting for all property and other assets and all Program funds received and expended each fiscal year.
( b ) *Internal control.* The State agency shall maintain effective control over and accountability for all Program grants and funds. The State agency must have effective internal controls to ensure that expenditures financed with Program funds are authorized and properly chargeable to the Program.
( c ) *Record of expenditures.* The State agency shall maintain records which adequately identify the source and use of funds expended for Program activities. These records shall contain, but are not limited to, information pertaining to authorization, receipt of funds, obligations, unobligated balances, assets, liabilities, outlays, and income.
( d ) *Payment of costs.* The State shall implement procedures which ensure prompt and accurate payment of allowable costs, and ensure the allowability and allocability of costs in accordance with the cost principles and standard provisions of this part, 2 CFR part 200, subpart D, USDA implementing regulations 2 CFR part 400 and part 415, and FNS guidelines and instructions.
( e ) *Identification of obligated funds.* The State agency shall implement procedures which accurately identify obligated Program funds at the time the obligations are made.
( f ) *Resolution of audit findings.* The State agency shall implement procedures which ensure timely and appropriate resolution of claims and other matters resulting from audit findings and recommendations.
( g ) *Use of minority- and women-owned banks.* Consistent with the national goals of expanding opportunities for minority business enterprises, State and local agencies are encouraged to use minority- and women-owned banks.
( h ) *Adjustment of expenditures.* The State agency must adjust projected expenditures to account for redeemed food instruments and for other changes as appropriate.
( i ) *Transfer of cash.* The State agency shall have controls to minimize the time elapsing between receipt of Federal funds from the U.S. Department of Treasury and the disbursements of these funds for Program costs. In the Letter of Credit system, the State agency shall make drawdowns from the U.S. Department of Treasury's Regional Disbursing Office as close as possible to the actual date that disbursement of funds is made. Advances made by the State agency to local agencies shall also conform to these same standards.
( j ) *Local agency financial management.* The State agency shall ensure that all local agencies develop and implement a financial management system consistent with requirements prescribed by FNS and the State agency pursuant to the requirements of this section.
[50 FR 6121, Feb. 13, 1985; 50 FR 8098, Feb. 28, 1985, as amended at 65 FR 83286, Dec. 29, 2000; 81 FR 66494, Sept. 28, 2016]
EXHIBIT
32





CASCADE
TECHNOLOGIES CORP.





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cascade Technologies Corp.
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending November 30, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Erik Lindsley,  as President and Principal Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      January 8, 2010
            By:
            /s/Erik
      LindsleyName:
      Erik LindsleyTitle:
      President (Principal Executive Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the
United States Code has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant
to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United
States Code and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by
reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the
Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such
filing.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

PENSACOLA DIVISION

IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS 

EARPLUG PRODUCTS

Case No. 3:19md2885

LIABILITY LITIGATION

This Document Relates to: 

Adkins, 7:20cv012

Judge M. Casey Rodgers

Magistrate Judge Gary R. Jones

DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS ORDER NO. 6

This Order addresses Plaintiff’s objections and counter-designations to 

Defendants’ affirmative deposition designations and Defendants’ objections to 

Plaintiff’s counter-designations thereto for the following witness depositions:

1. Martin Salon (01/29/2020)

SO ORDERED this 29th day of September, 2021.

M. Casey Rodgers M. CASEY RODGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 7:20-cv-00012-MCR-GRJ Document 108 Filed 09/29/21 Page 1 of 1
138 So.2d 11

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Kathleen GARRETT.

No. 45838.

Feb. 19, 1962.

John Makar, Natchitoches, for defendant-appellant.

Jack P. F. Gremillion, Atty. Gen., M. E. Culligan, Asst. Atty. Gen., George T. Anderson, Jr., Dist. Atty., Coushatta, for appellee.

SANDERS, Justice.

The defendant was charged with aggravated battery on a police officer. She was convicted of simple battery and sentenced to sixty days in the parish jail. From the conviction and sentence she has appealed.

During the course of her trial, the defendant reserved seven bills of exception. On the day the case was fixed for argument before this Court, the defendant made no appearance, either in person or through counsel, and no brief was filed in her behalf. Under these circumstances the bills of exception are considered to be abandoned. State v. Perry, 239 La. 131, 118 So.2d 130; City of Natchitoches v. Dorfer, 226 La. 822, *77*So.2d 407; State v. Brumfield, 226 La. 103, 75 So.2d 23; State v. Carter, 226 La. 57, 74 So.2d 902; State v. Weaver, 222 La. 148, 62 So.2d 255; State v. De Soto, 221 La. 624, 60 So.2d 65.

There remains for our consideration only errors patent on the face of the record. We have reviewed the record and have found no such error.

For the reasons assigned, the conviction and sentence are affirmed.
Regulations.gov ... c'f.> Monthly Biodies ... 

You are here: EPA Home » Fuels Registration, Reporting, and compliance Help» 2015 Renewable Fuel Standard data 

201 5 Renewable Fuel Standard data 

Data are current as of November 10, 2015. 

~ IUN Generation Summary 

RINs Generated 

• RIN Generation Error Corrections are defined as RINs that have been retired in EMTS using 

any of the three retirement reason codes of Invalid RIN, Import Volume Error Correction, or 

Volume Error Correction. 

• Net R!Ns generated shows the total number of R!Ns generated minus the invalid R!Ns 

generated. 

Fuel (D Code) Total RINs RIN Generation Error Net RINs 

Generated Correaions Generated 

Cellulosic Biofuel (D3) 100,700,944 716,177 99,984,767 

Biomass-Based Diesel 2,304,047,770 1,298,688 2,302,749,082 (04) 

Advanced Biofuel (D5) 102,710,072 24,661 102,685,411 

Renewable Fuel (D6) 12,287,010,482 3,973,992 12,283,036,490 

Cellulosic Diesel (D7) 227,034 27,530 199,504
July 30, 2020VIA EDGAR Nicholas Fund, Inc.411 East Wisconsin AvenueMilwaukee, Wisconsin 53202Ladies and Gentlemen: We have acted as counsel to Nicholas Fund, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Maryland (the “Corporation”), in connection with the preparation and filing of a registration statement on Form N-1A and amendments thereto (the “Registration Statement”), relating to the registration of shares of common stock of the Corporation (“Shares”) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. As counsel for the Corporation, we are familiar with the proceedings taken by it in connection with the authorization, issuance and sale of the Shares in the manner referred to in the Registration Statement. In addition, we have examined and are familiar with the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation (the “Articles of Incorporation”), the Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Corporation (the “Bylaws”), and such other documents as we have deemed relevant to the matters referred to in this opinion. We have also assumed the following for purposes of this opinion: 1. The Corporation is duly organized and validly existing under Maryland law. 2. The Shares have been, or will be, issued in accordance with the Corporation’s Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws. 3. The Shares have been, or will be, issued against consideration therefor as described in the Corporation’s prospectus relating thereto, and such consideration was, or will have been, in each case at least equal to the applicable net asset value and the applicable par value. 4. The number of outstanding Shares has not and will not exceed the number of Shares authorized. Based upon the foregoing, we are of the opinion that: A. The Corporation is authorized to issue up to two hundred million (200,000,000) Shares, including those shares currently issued and outstanding. 790 North Water Street, Suite 2500|Milwaukee, WI 53202|T414.271.6560|F414.277.0656 michaelbest.com


---



Nicholas Fund, Inc.July 30, 2020Page 2 B. The Shares to be offered for sale pursuant to the Registration Statement, upon issuance and sale in the manner described in the Registration Statement, will be legally issued, fully paid and non-assessable Shares of the Corporation. We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to Post-Effective Amendment No. 79 to the Registration Statement, and to the use of our name in the Registration Statement. In giving this consent, however, we do not admit that we are "experts" within the meaning of Section 11 of the Securities Act, or within the category of persons whose consent is required by Section 7 of said Act. Sincerely, MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP /S/ Michael Best & Friedrich LLP 070408-0004\28648220.v1
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF FRANK AIELLO


                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

     In connection with the Periodic Report of Cal Alta Auto Glass,
Inc.,(the "Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"),  I, Kirk Reed,  President of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1.) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2.) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: August 17, 2009            By: /s/ Kirk Reed
                                 -------------------
                                 Kirk Reed
                                 President/CEO/Chief Accounting
                                 Officer/ Dir.
Exhibit 32.1
                                  ------------

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                -------------------------------------------------
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      --------------------------------------------------------------------

         In connection with the Annual Report of China Resources Development,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Ching Lung Po, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Ching Lung Po

Ching Lung Po
Chief Executive Officer
March 30, 2004