alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Notes: 1. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 83 FR 22178, May 14, 2018. 2. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 83 FR 61310, Nov. 29, 2018 3. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 85 FR 65504, Oct. 15, 2020. 4. Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 87 FR 44266, July 26, 2022.

Editorial Note on Subpart D of Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subpart D of part 2 appear at 60 FR 66713, Dec. 26, 1995.

§ 2.37 Director, Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization. ( a ) In compliance with the Small Business Act, the Director, Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization is designated as the Department's Director of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization, who shall report directly to the Secretary of Agriculture or the Deputy Secretary of Agriculture. The Director of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization has specific responsibilities under the Small Business Act, 15 U.S.C. 644(k). These duties include being responsible for the following: ( 1 ) Administer the Department's small and disadvantaged business activities related to procurement contracts, minority bank deposits, and grants and loan activities affecting small and minority businesses including women-owned business, and the small business, small minority business, and small women-owned business subcontracting programs.
( 2 ) Provide Departmentwide liaison and coordination of activities related to small, small disadvantaged, and women-owned businesses with the Small Business Administration and others in the public and private sector.
( 3 ) Develop policies and procedures required by the applicable provision of the Small Business Act, as amended, to include the establishment of goals.
( 4 ) Implement and administer programs described under sections 8 and 15 of the Small Business Act, as amended (15 U.S.C. 637 and 644).
( 5 ) In compliance with the Veterans Benefits Act of 2003 (Pub. L. 108-183) amending the Small Business Act, implement and administer procurement programs for small business concerns owned and controlled by service-disabled veterans.
( b ) The following additional authorities are delegated by the Secretary of Agriculture to the Director, Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization: ( 1 ) In compliance with the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act (41 U.S.C. 8501 *et seq.*), implement and administer the Department's AbilityOne program for purchases from qualified nonprofit agencies for the blind or for the severely disabled.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
[79 FR 44112, July 30, 2014]
H. R. 2112 

One Hundred Thirteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Friday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and fourteen 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 787 State 

Route 17M in Monroe, New York, as the ‘‘National Clandestine Service of the 

Central Intelligence Agency NCS Officer Gregg David Wenzel Memorial Post 

Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. NATIONAL CLANDESTINE SERVICE OF THE CENTRAL 

INTELLIGENCE AGENCY NCS OFFICER GREGG DAVID 

WENZEL MEMORIAL POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 787 State Route 17M in Monroe, New York, 

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘National Clandestine Service 

of the Central Intelligence Agency NCS Officer Gregg David Wenzel 

Memorial Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘National Clandestine Service of the Central Intelligence 

Agency NCS Officer Gregg David Wenzel Memorial Post Office’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit 10.64 NSE 2004 FORM 10-K Director Compensation






NON-MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR COMPENSATION 



It is currently the Company’s
policy to compensate non-management members of its Board of Directors as follows: 



     	1. 	
          Annual Retainers:  



          





	 	  	$35,000 for
Board service  









	  	  	$15,000 for
Audit Committee  Chair 







	 	  	$10,000 for
Compensation Committee Chair and Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee Chair






     	2. 	
          Meeting Attendance: 



          




	  	  	$1,500 per
Board meeting attended  










	  	  	$1,500 per
          committee meeting attended 










	  	  	$1,000 per
committee meeting attended by chairperson (in addition to $1,500 above)  






	3. 	  	Stock:  






	  	  	2,500 stock
grant upon election to Board  









	  	  	10,000 option
grant per year (vests on the day before the next annual stockholders’ meeting)
CERTIFICATION



I, Christine Thomas, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officers, if any, and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and I (we) have:



a.

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b.

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (Evaluation Date); and

c.

presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.

The registrants other certifying officers, if any, and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a.

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b.

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and



6.

The registrants other certifying officers, if any, and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were any significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.







/s/ Christine Thomas

Date: April 24, 2007

Christine Thomas, Secretary/Director

Chief Financial Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, FKA Bank of New York, as Trustee for the Certificateholders of the CWABS, Inc., Asset

- Backed Certificates, Series 2006

- 2,

Plaintiff

- counter

defendant

- Appellee,

v.

SOMMERSET PARK HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION; ALESSI & KO ENIG, LLC,

Defendants,

and

SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC,

Defendant

- counter

- claimant

cross

- claimant

- Appellant,

v.

HOUSEHOLD FINANCE REALTY CORPORATION OF NEVADA; et al.,

Cross

- claim

- defendants. No. 19

- 16891

D.C. No. 2:16

- cv

- 01811

- GMN

- DJA

MEMORANDUM *

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3. 

# FILED

JAN 24 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 11, 2023 * * Pasadena, California

Before: CALLAHAN, R. NELSON, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

SFR Investment s Pool 1, LLC (SFR) appeals from the district court’s grant

of summary judgment for Bank of New York Mellon (BNYM) in a quiet title and

declaratory relief action involving residential property located in Las Vega s,
Nevada. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, review de novo,

Berezovsky v. Moniz , 869 F.3d 923, 927 (9th Cir. 2017), and affirm.

This case arises from a foreclosure sale to satisfy a homeowners association

(HOA) “superpriority lien” on the prop erty. Nevada law provides that if a

homeowner fails to pay a certain portion of HOA dues, the HOA is authorized to

foreclose on a “superpriority lien” in that amount, extinguishing other liens and

encumbrances on the delinquent property, including a previ ously recorded first

deed of trust. See Nev. Rev. Stat. § 116.3116. However, a lender holding a first

deed of trust may avoid extinguishment of its lien by tendering payment on the

“superpriority” portion of the unpaid HOA dues. See Bank of Am., N.A. v.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).3

Arlington W. Twilight Homeowners Ass’n , 920 F.3d 620, 622

– 23 (9th Cir. 2019);

see also Bank of Am., N.A. v. SFR Invs. Pool 1, LLC
, 427 P.3d 113, 116

– 17 (Nev.

2018) (en banc) (

Diamond Spur ).

SFR ’ s primary assertion on appeal is that BNYM’s claim is untimely

because it was not filed within three years of the foreclosure sale

. T his argument

was rejected by the Nevada Supreme Court in U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Thunder

Prop erties , Inc. , 503 P.3d 299 (Nev. 2022), which held th at Nevada’s four

- year

catch

- all statute of limitations applied to quiet title actions. Id . at 302.

As the statute of limitations issue is the only issue clearly developed on this

appeal, we do not address any other argument s

. The district court’s grant of judgment to BNYM is AFFIRMED

.
Exhibit 10.32


 





 


February
28, 2005


 


Dave
Daly


 


Dear
Dave:


 


Our
team at ChromaVision Medical Systems, Inc. is pleased to offer you the position
of Vice President, Sales. This position will report directly to the Company’s
President and Chief Executive Officer.


 


The
Company’s proposed compensation package can be summarized as follows:


 


•                  An annual base salary of $170,000, payable in
biweekly increments.


 


•                  Eligibility for participation in the 2005
Management Incentive Program, an annual performance- based bonus, with a target
payment of 40% of base salary based on the achievement of objectives as
determined by the Company. This amount will be pro-rated in 2005 based on the
number of months of service.


 


•                  Recommendation to the Compensation Committee
of the Board of Directors a Stock Option Grant in the amount of 75,000
qualified (incentive) shares. Upon approval, the option price will reflect the
market price at the close of business on the date of grant. A letter detailing
the terms and conditions of the grant, including vesting schedule, will be
forwarded to you.


 


•                  Eligibility to participate in ChromaVision’s
benefit program, effective the first of the month following your date of hire.
Eligibility for the 401(k) Plan is effective the first calendar quarter following
date of hire.


 


•                  Car allowance of $600 per month.


 


•                  You will begin the accrual of vacation at the
rate of three weeks and two days per year in addition to the standard paid
holidays.


 


All
of the items outlined above are subject to mutual negotiation of a formal
letter agreement of employment, which will be provided to you shortly, to
include the several items noted above. Please note that as a condition of
employment, you will be required to sign a Non-Disclosure and Invention
Assignment Agreement, an Insider Trading Policy Agreement, a Code of Conduct,
and a Summary detailing Black-Out Periods. This offer is contingent upon
satisfactory completion of a pre-placement drug and alcohol screen that will be
paid for by the Company, as well as a successful background and reference
check.


 





















 


If
you have any questions, or require additional information, please do not
hesitate to call me. We look forward to working with you, and having you as
part of our team!


 


	
  Sincerely,

  
	
   

  
	
  /s/
  Ronnie Andrews

  	
   

  
	
  Ronnie
  Andrews

  
	
  President
  and Chief Executive Officer

  
	
  ChromaVision
  Medical Systems, Inc.

  



 


	
  I accept 

  	
  /s/ David J. Daly
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7307

LAWRENCE MICHAEL HARRISON, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; FEDERAL

BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; INTERNAL REVENUE

SERVICE; BUREAU OF PRISONS,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. (CA-99-513-BR)

Submitted: April 27, 2001 Decided: May 21, 2001

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Lawrence Michael Harrison, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Fenita Morris

Shepard, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Lawrence Michael Harrison, Sr., appeals the district court’s

order denying his claim for damages under the FTCA. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the

recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Harrison v. United States, No. CA-99-513-BR (E.D.N.C. Aug.

15, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Max Kaufman, as Administrator of the Estate of Pauline Kaufman, Deceased, Appellant, v. State of New York, Respondent. (And Other Related Actions.)

(Claims Nos. 35048, 35049, 35050, 35051, 35052.)

Reynolds, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims dismissing appellant’s claim after a trial on the merits. Claimant, Max Kaufman, seeks to recover for injuries sustained by himself, his deceased wife and his two minor children, *588when his automobile failed to negotiate a zigzag curve on Route 9W between Catskill and Saugerties and struck an embankment. The Trial Judge denied all claims, finding that the State had not negligently constructed and maintained the road, that there were adequate warning signs and that Max Kaufman, the driver, was contributorily negligent. Although by today’s enlightened criteria the road would possibly not be properly constructed, it is readily evident that it did comply with the standards applicable when it was planned and built in 1911 and the State was not required to rebuild the road at this point, a major undertaking according to the testimony, unless the curve could not be negotiated at a moderate speed *(Ruggiero*v. *State of New York,*256 App. Div. 437). On the instant record the trial court was not required to find that it was impossible to negotiate the curve at the posted speed limit. Similarly, he was not required to find that the six warning signs placed at four different locations were inadequate *(Ruggiero*v. *State of New York,*supra; cf. *Canepa*v. *State of New York, 306 N.*Y. 272) or confusing. *Nor*does the fact that one particular sign was 100 feet too close to the curve affect the result since the other signs gave an adequate warning *(Hicks*v. *State of New York,*4 N Y 2d 1, 7-8). Finally, there was more than adequate proof that Max Kaufman was guilty of contributory negligence which would act as a bar to his claim. Accordingly, since we find advanced no other adequate grounds for reversal, the trial court’s dismissal of the claims must be affirmed. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Staley, Jr., and Brink, JJ., concur with Reynolds, J.
APPENDIX B 

METEOROLOGY 

SURFACE AND UPPER-AIR MAPS 

[U.S. Department of Commerce, http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/dailywxmap/index.html] 

June 2008

June 20, 2008 

June 21, 2008 
June 22, 2008 

June 23, 2008 

June 24, 2008 
June 25, 2008 

June 26, 2008 

June 27, 2008 
June 28, 2008 

June 29, 2008 

June 30, 2008 
July 2008

July 1, 2008 

July 2, 2008 

July 3, 2008 
July 4, 2008 

July 5, 2008 

July 6, 2008 
July 7, 2008 

July 8, 2008 

July 9, 2008 
July 10, 2008 

July 11, 2008 

July 12, 2008 
July 13, 2008 

July 14, 2008 

July 15, 2008 
July 16, 2008 

July 17, 2008 

July 18, 2008 
July 19, 2008 

July 20, 2008 

July 21, 2008 
July 22, 2008 

July 23, 2008 

July 24, 2008 
July 25, 2008 

July 26, 2008 

July 27, 2008 
July 28, 2008 

July 29, 2008 

July 30, 2008 
July 31, 2008 

August 2008

August 9, 2008 

August 10, 2008 
August 15, 2008 

August 16, 2008
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Post-Effective Amendment No. 1
to the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-46707) of Health Management
Associates, Inc. and in the related Prospectus of our report dated October 22,
1999,(except for Note 3 as to which the date is November 30, 1999) with respect
to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Health management
Associates, Inc. included in the annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
September 30, 1999.


                                             ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
December 20, 1999
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 29, 2024

NO. 03

- 23

- 00067

- CR

David Cardenas , Appellant

v.

The State of Texas , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 460TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIA NA AND SMITH

MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the judgment sig ned by the tr i a l court on January 18, 2023 . Having

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error

in the trial court’s judgment but that there was error requiring correction. Therefore, the C ourt

modifi es the judgment to remove the statement that Cardenas pleaded “ not tru e ” to the motion to

adju dicate and re flect ins tead that Cardenas made “ no ple a ” to the mot ion to adju dicate

. The

Court affirms the judgment as modified. Because appellant is indigent a nd u nable to pay costs,

no adjudica t i on of costs is made.
§ 1775.63 Objectives. The objectives of the program are to: ( a ) Reduce or eliminate pollution of water resources, and
( b ) Improve planning and management of solid waste sites.
#### § 1718.54 Availability of model mortgage.

Single copies of the model mortgage (RUS Informational Publication 1718 B) are available from the Rural Utilities Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC 20250-1500. This document may be reproduced.

[60 FR 36888, July 18, 1995, as amended at 86 FR 36197, July 9, 2021]
#### § 1520.5 Agency Appeal Official.

Any person whose request under § 1520.4 is denied shall have the right to appeal such a denial. For appeals, write to the following official and mark your letters “FOIA Appeal”: Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20250-1004, Attn: FOIA Appeal.
March 13, 1980.

M. P. No. 80-10.

#### Catherine E. Schwarz *v.*Coastal Resources Management Council, State of Rhode Island *et al.*

Certiorari was denied in this case on February 28,1980. *919Petitioner has filed a motion requesting that we reconsider our decision. The petitioner seeks review of a Superior Court ruling affirming a decision of the Coastal Resources Management Council. The Superior Court justice, after noting his limited powers of review in administrative appeals, stated:

*Catherine E. Schwarz,*pro se, for petitioner, *Goldman 6-Biafore, Dennis H. Esposito,*for respondents.

> *“As*I indicated earlier, there are few avenues open in view of the statute that governs administrative appeals, and I do not find anything in the record that would authorize the court to grant relief as prayed for by the plaintiff.”

We have thoroughly reexamined the petition for certiorari and accompanying exhibits and we find therein no basis for disturbing the conclusion of the Superior Court justice.

Therefore, the motion of petitioner requesting that we reconsider our previous denial of certiorari is denied.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: X-15research results: with a selected bibliography**
 
PDF | Mobi | ePub
 
SuDoc Number:NAS 1.21:60
Item Number:0830-I (online)
CGP systemNumber:000588672
 
May 23, 2018
96-436.

#### Columbus Bar Assn. v. Sterner.

This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing on July 17,1998, by the Clients’ Security Fund of a motion for order to show cause why respondent should not be found in contempt for failure to comply with this court’s order of December 18,1996. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by this court, *sua sponte,*that James M. Sterner, Attorney Registration No. 0034047, last known address in Columbus, Ohio, is found in contempt for failure to comply with this court’s order of December 18, 1996. It is further ordered that this cause be referred to the Office of the Attorney General for collection.